text: 彗美子

title: 彗美子


text: 寿美子

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: 寿美子


text: 壽美子

title: 壽美子


text: 澄子

title: 澄子


text:
jorgalit

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to turn, to turn over
 * 2) to turn around, to turn back
 * 3) to translate
 * 4) to convert, to transform, to change
 * 5) to convert (religiously)

title: jorgalit


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 崇 read as す


text: placentaries

title: placentaries


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Samic/jorkëlētēk

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to turn around

Descendants

 * Western Samic:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Samic/jorkëlētēk


text:
prošeakta

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) project

title: prošeakta


text: jagis

title: jagis


text:
ছাড়া

Etymology
, from.

The postposition was formed from the verb.

Postposition

 * 1) without
 * 2) besides, other than, apart from, except
 * 1) besides, other than, apart from, except

Verb

 * 1) to take off clothes
 * 2) to let go, to release
 * 3) to quit
 * 1) to let go, to release
 * 2) to quit
 * 1) to quit
 * 1) to quit

title: ছাড়া


text:
gávdnot

Etymology 1
From.

Verb

 * 1) to be found
 * 2) to exist

title: gávdnot


text: 火魅子

title: 火魅子


text:
gávdnon

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) occurrence

title: gávdnon


text: gávdnojit

title: gávdnojit


text: 妃魅姑

title: 妃魅姑


text: 妃魅子

title: 妃魅子


text: 氷美子

title: 氷美子


text:
eŋgelasgiella

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1)  English language

title: eŋgelasgiella


text: multiballs

title: multiballs


text:
eŋgelas

Adjective

 * 1) English

title: eŋgelas


text: eaŋgals

title: eaŋgals


text: eaŋgalas

title: eaŋgalas


text: eaŋgalasgiella

title: eaŋgalasgiella


text:
bubbly-jock

Etymology
Imitative, from the bird's cry.

Noun

 * 1)  A turkeycock the bird.
 * 2)  A turkeycock pompous or self-important person.

title: bubbly-jock


text: bubbly-jocks

title: bubbly-jocks


text:
ólomkatona

Noun

 * 1) tin soldier a toy soldier made out of lead

title: ólomkatona


text: 落涂

title: 落涂


text:
subatrial

Adjective

 * 1)  Beneath an atrium (of the heart)

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to a subatrium

title: subatrial


text:
subcircuitry

Noun

 * 1) The collection of subcircuits of a system

title: subcircuitry


text:
smi

Etymology
From, compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Pronunciation

 * (Stau)

Noun

 * 1) woman, female.
 * 2) (Especially) young girls.

Etymology
Possibly reduced from a compound, from the bound state of 🇰🇲 + a morpheme from ; compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  fire

Verb

 * 1)  to be cooked

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to forge, hammer, work

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to forge, hammer, work
 * 2) make woodshaving

title: smi


text:
sublaminate

Noun

 * 1) Each single sheet of a laminate

Related terms

 * sublamination

title: sublaminate


text:
落塗

Verb

 * 1)  to sow seeds
 * 2)  to bury; to inter
 * 3)  to fall to the ground
 * 4)  to be born
 * 5)  to step on the ground; to stand on one's feet; to land
 * 1)  to step on the ground; to stand on one's feet; to land

Synonyms

title: 落塗


text:
Citations:opprobative

noun: a term that expresses opprobrium, a pejorative

 * 1990, Patrick Colm Hogan, The Politics of Interpretation: Ideology, Professionalism, and the Study of Literature, Oxford University Press (ISBN 9780195362718), page 45:
 * [...] that which is not, say, Marxist, deconstructive, or whatever, is named by an opprobative and characterized as oppressive or patriarchal, naive, and so on.

adjective

 * 1977, John F. Klein, Arthur Montague, Check Forgers, Great Source Education Group Incorporated:
 * Used to describe a check writer, its connotative moral implications are opprobative. On the other hand, the term could readily describe any government or business decision-maker, in which case it not only becomes approbative, it becomes ...

title: Citations:opprobative


text: opprobrie

title: opprobrie


text:
submammalian

Adjective

 * 1)  Describing any animal that is considered to be less advanced than a mammal

title: submammalian


text:
Río Muni

Proper noun

 * 1) The mainland geographical region of Equatorial Guinea.

title: Río Muni


text:
submolar

Adjective

 * 1)  Less than molar (concentration or amount)

title: submolar


text:
fulfremed

Etymology
From, , equivalent to.

Adjective

 * 1) accomplished, fulfilled; perfected, complete

Etymology
Past participle of.

Adjective

 * 1) perfect
 * 2)  perfect tense

title: fulfremed


text:
Bioko

Etymology
Named in honor of Equatoguinean politician.

Proper noun

 * 1) A volcanic island in Equatorial Guinea, located off the coast of Cameroon in the Bight of Biafra.

title: Bioko


text:
subnecrotic

Adjective

 * 1) Less than is needed to cause necrosis

title: subnecrotic


text:
subthalamotomy

Noun

 * 1)  sectioning of the subthalamus

title: subthalamotomy


text:
dárbbašit

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to need, to require

title: dárbbašit


text: smiende

title: smiende


text: νεώτερος

title: νεώτερος


text: smis

title: smis


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Samic/tārpëššëtēk

Verb

 * 1) to need, to require

Descendants

 * Western Samic:
 * Eastern Samic:
 * Eastern Samic:
 * Eastern Samic:
 * Eastern Samic:
 * Eastern Samic:
 * Eastern Samic:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Samic/tārpëššëtēk


text:
subjoint

Noun

 * 1) A secondary or subsidiary joint.

title: subjoint


text: subjoints

title: subjoints


text:
cephalagra

Noun

 * 1) gout in the head

title: cephalagra


text:
Bettwäsche

Noun

 * 1) bedding, bedclothes, bedlinen

title: Bettwäsche


text: dárbbaša

title: dárbbaša


text: veahki

title: veahki


text: smir

title: smir


text:
লহিয়া

Verb

 * 1) set

title: লহিয়া


text: arbutes

title: arbutes


text:
mearkkašit

Verb

 * 1) to note, to make note of
 * 2) to mark
 * 3) to mean, to denote

title: mearkkašit


text: mearkkaša

title: mearkkaša


text: fáttá

title: fáttá


text: smidd

title: smidd


text:
Talk:quaintrelle

RFV discussion: August–September 2018
The etymology is certainly bullshit. I only found one use from this century. DTLHS (talk) 23:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

 * cited (and I severely cut back the overly wordy definition). Kiwima (talk) 00:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note that all of these citations are from after the date that the entry was created (2008). Can we confirm that the word actually appears in "New English Dictionary on Historical Principals"? DTLHS (talk) 00:55, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does (page 14, column 2). It is labelled as obscure and rare, with only one known occurrence. — SGconlaw (talk) 09:11, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I updated the etymology and did a general clean-up of the entry. — SGconlaw (talk) 16:34, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 21:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Early citations
Here are some early citations from Google Books (with links) for the Middle English (relating to the same, and apparently only, original source for the term): -Stelio (talk) 22:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 1869, edited by William Aldis Wright, The Pilgrimage of the Lyf of the Manhode: From the French of Guillame de Deguileville, J. B. Nichols and Sons, page i, Preface:
 * The following English prose version of Le pèlerinage de la vie humaine is printed from a manuscript in the University Library, Cambridge, formerly in the possession of Bishop Moore, of which the class-mark is Ff. 5. 30. The MS. is on vellum, and consists of 136 folios, numbered from 5 to 140. It was probably written about the year 1430, a century after the composition of the original poem. The version is slavishly faithful, so much so as to be occasionally obscure; French idioms being literally rendered, and the order of the words to a great extent preserved. The divisions of the lines of the poem are indicated in the manuscript by the signs and (.) It has not seemed worth while to reproduce these marks of division in the text, as they might be misleading, and therefore punctuation of any kind has been omitted. The numbers in square brackets indicate the commencement of each folio of the MS. Excepting in these two points, and in the substitution of ‘th’ for ‘þ,’ which almost invariably represents the heavier sound of ‘th’ as in ‘this,’ the manuscript has been literally followed.
 * ...page 160, cap. xlvii:
 * It folweth nouht that thouh j be thus kembt and a litel make the queyntrelle that for swich cause i am fair I am foul old and slauery foule stinkage and dungy
 * ...p242, Glossary:
 * Queyntrelle, sb. 160. ‘And a litel make the queyntrelle’ is a literal rendering of the French Et vng peu fais la cointerelle.
 * 1985, The Pilgrimage of the Lyfe of the Manhode, Original Series, issue 288, page 136:
 * It folweth nouht þat þouh I be þus kembt and a litel make þe queyntrelle, þat for swich cause I am fair. I am foul, old and slauery, foule stinkage and dungy:

title: Talk:quaintrelle


text:
Talk:euthanasiate

RFV discussion: August–September 2018
The usage note entertainingly points out that "this is never used, but is listed as a third spelling in Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary" — which seems to be true. Equinox ◑ 11:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

 * [Google Scholar] gives one use as a verb, and two as a noun. Kiwima (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * cited Kiwima (talk) 06:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

 * Noun looks all right. The verb citations all seem to be foreigners having a guess at what the verb might be; but okay. "Nonstandard"? Equinox ◑ 03:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:euthanasiate


text:
dovddaldat

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) distinguishing mark, marker, sign
 * 2)  account

title: dovddaldat


text: boahtá

title: boahtá


text:
piw

Etymology
From, from , (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬), from.

Pronoun

 * 1)  who

Etymology
If the original meaning was "something prominent or protuberant," possibly related to.

Noun

 * 1) udder

title: piw


text:
fulfremednes

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) perfection
 * 2) * c. 992, Ælfric, "The First Sunday in the Lord's Advent"
 * "ang"

- Ðas gewædu awrát se ylca apostol swutellicor on oðre stowe, ðus cweðende, "Ymbscrydað eow, swa swa Godes gecorenan, mid mildheortnysse and mid welwillendnysse, mid eadmodnysse, mid gemetfæstnysse, mid geðylde, and habbað eow, toforan eallum ðingum, ða soðan lufe, seoðe is bénd ealra fulfremednyssa; and Cristes sib blissige on eowrum heortum, on ðære ge sind gecígede on anum lichaman.

title: fulfremednes


text:
geavaheaddjidovddaldat

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  user account

title: geavaheaddjidovddaldat


text:
unfulfremed

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) imperfect

title: unfulfremed


text:
pyth

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬), from  (compare 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) thing

Pronoun

 * 1)  what

title: pyth


text: geavaheaddjedovddaldat

title: geavaheaddjedovddaldat


text:
بمبه

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1)  pink

Adjective

 * 1)  pink

title: بمبه


text:
unfulfremednes

Etymology
From or.

Noun

 * 1) imperfection

title: unfulfremednes


text:
kouluruoka

Noun

 * 1) school food food offered by a school
 * 2) school meal

title: kouluruoka


text:
ráhkadit

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Verb

 * 1) to make, to prepare
 * 2) to build, to construct
 * 3) to establish

title: ráhkadit


text:
viiddidit

Verb

 * 1) to widen, to broaden
 * 2) to expand

title: viiddidit


text:
yrast trap

Noun

 * 1)  A local minimum on the graph of yrast for a certain spin.

title: yrast trap


text: compravendes

title: compravendes


text: yrast traps

title: yrast traps


text:
muhtin

Etymology
From.

Determiner

 * 1) some, a few

title: muhtin


text:
beroštupmi

Noun

 * 1) interest
 * 2) inclination

title: beroštupmi


text:
cavobuono

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  hoist

title: cavobuono


text:
Template:Pardalotidae Hypernyms

 * Passeri - suborder; Corvida - parvorder; Meliphagoidea - superfamily; Pardalotidae - family

title: Template:Pardalotidae Hypernyms


text:
Template:Pardalotidae Hypernyms/documentation

This is a typing shortcut intended for use under the Hypernyms header of taxa under family Pardalotidae. It can also be used with subst:.


text:
trefgordd

Noun

 * 1)  A communal settlement in mediaeval Wales including a communal cattle pasture and smithy.

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  trefgordd

title: trefgordd


text:
ぼれい

Noun

 * 1)  oyster; roasted and powdered oyster shell, used in antacids, sedatives, and as a bird feed additive

title: ぼれい


text:
sávaldat

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) wish, desire

title: sávaldat


text: gorfodtref

title: gorfodtref


text:
sevnnjodit

Verb

 * 1) to darken, to become dark

title: sevnnjodit


text:
memorístic

Adjective

 * 1) related to memory

title: memorístic


text:
snufse

Etymology
Related to the noun

Verb

 * 1) to sniff, sniffle
 * 2) to snort

Etymology
Related to the noun

Verb

 * 1) to sniff, sniffle
 * 2) to snort

title: snufse


text:
sevnnjodeapmi

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) eclipse

title: sevnnjodeapmi


text:
beaivvášsevnnjodeapmi

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) solar eclipse

title: beaivvášsevnnjodeapmi


text: memorístics

title: memorístics


text:
خ م ع

Root

 * 1) related to limping

Derived terms

 * ; pl.
 * ; pl.
 * ; pl.
 * ; pl.
 * ; pl.

title: خ م ع


text:
خمع

Verb

 * 1) to limp, to be lame, to hobble

Noun

 * 1) wolf
 * 2)  thief

title: خمع


text:
خ م ص

Root

 * 1) related to a state of being shrunken, sunken, hollow

Derived terms

 * and and

title: خ م ص


text: memorístiques

title: memorístiques


text:
خ م ل

Root

 * 1) related to denseness

Derived terms

 * and

title: خ م ل


text:
خملة

Noun

 * 1) something concealed, secret, internum of the mind

title: خملة


text:
خمل

Verb

 * 1) to be effaced, to be obliterated, to be obscure, to be unapparent, to be imperceptible; to become effaced, to become obliterated, to become obscure, to become unapparent, to become imperceptible
 * 2) to be soft, to be smooth; to become soft, to become smooth

Noun

 * 1) redundancy of hair, plush, fluff, fuzz, nap
 * 2)  fimbriae
 * 3)  fringes, fimbriae

Adjective

 * 1) languid, supine

title: خمل


text:
خمان

Etymology
Apparently from variant of  from the root  referring to the qualities of the elder to absorb light.

Noun

 * 1) elder, elderberry ( gen. et spp.)

title: خمان


text:
خمن

Etymology
Apparently a variation of the root.

Verb

 * 1) to be obscure, to be unapparent, to be hidden, to be concealed; to become obscure, to become unapparent, to become hidden, to become concealed

Verb

 * 1) to conjecture, to guess, to presume, to ween, to surmise

title: خمن


text: Category:Arabic terms belonging to the root خ م ع


text: Category:Arabic terms belonging to the root خ م ل


text:
quote-part

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) share, portion

title: quote-part


text: snufses

title: snufses


text: snufser

title: snufser


text:
eambbo

Etymology
Contraction of, the genitive singular form of.

Adverb

 * 1) more
 * 2) rather

title: eambbo


text:
seocnes

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) sickness, disease

title: seocnes


text:
eanet

Determiner

 * 1) more

title: eanet


text:
eanemus

Determiner

 * 1) most

Adverb

 * 1) most
 * 2) the most preferably

title: eanemus


text: snufs

title: snufs


text: snufsa

title: snufsa


text:
Talk:to-gloried

RFD discussion: September 2018
Moved to . Per utramque cavernam 11:19, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

RFV discussion: April–October 2018
The term is attested only once (in the quotation I have duly moved /having corrected it/ to the citation page); it is neither in the OED nor in the Middle English Dictionary. As it does not meet the criteria for inclusion, the entry can now be deleted without further ado. Jiří Bezděka (talk) 11:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Move to WT:RFVE? "Mankind: 1470" -- is it attestable as Middle English (requires only 1 cite)? -84.161.49.148 14:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Middle English does have the prefix (orange-linked, but I plan to add it soon) as a common prefix applied liberally to verbs and participles, including the function as an intensifier. It wouldn't be totally out of place considered as Middle English; that said, 1470 is pretty late and very ambiguous between ME and EModE. I can't find any other usage of in the more typical chronological range that would make a placement into ME more comfortable, and because I can't find a version of the cited text that isn't "updated" English, I can't really see how "Middle" or "Early Modern" the tendency of the original is.  So I don't know.  The formation of it would have been pretty commonplace and definitely unsurprising in ME, so I guess I lean slightly towards accepting it as ME, at least in theory. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 23:15, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ISO 639-2 defines Middle English as existing 1050-1500. We've usually gone along with that definition, because there is no hard line, at least at the modern end, and an arbitrary round and standard 1500 is as good as anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I just like to approach ~1450-1530 with wariness and deliberation for exactly the reason you stated.  This is just an odd case because often one can look forward or backward and see where the trend is with the word's use, but one data point obviously doesn't allow that.
 * Given this, and considering that the to- prefix tapered during EModE into rarity during ModE but was productive and common both in OE and ME, I think that including it in ME is valid. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 00:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I've never seen that done on Wiktionary. A work written in 1510 by a native English speaker in their native tongue is written in one language, not a mixture of two. Listing some words as Modern English (and not Middle) and some words as Middle English (and not Modern) does violence to the unity of the language. If necessary, I'd go the other way; a word in an intermediate text should attest both Middle English and Modern English, effectively calling the text simultaneously ME and ModE if we can't resolve it one way or the other.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:35, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I would agree with that: I feel the same way about Malory (1485-ish), who could really be justifiably cited in both ME and English entries (and is, I think). To be honest, the distinction between ME and English completely breaks down in a project like this one, which deals with historical language change. The literature shows a very steady and gradual change. Ƿidsiþ 08:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Moved from RFD. Per utramque cavernam 11:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

RFV-failed. I have converted the entry to Middle English, where a single cite suffices. Kiwima (talk) 20:27, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:to-gloried


text:
Talk:report to

RFD discussion: September 2018
Moved to . Per utramque cavernam 10:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

RFM discussion: May 2018–December 2019
Move to (or do we already have a relevant sense there?). In any case, delete. --Per utramque cavernam 13:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 * Yes, merge into report (sense 8 "to be accountable", with the usex "the financial director reports to the CEO", seems intended to cover this, although it might benefit from report to's longer definition). - -sche (discuss) 19:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I second -sche's idea. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Moved from RFD. Per utramque cavernam 10:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge per -sche. DCDuring (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

 * Merged. I left a redirect, but delete it if you like. - -sche (discuss) 04:53, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:report to


text:
Talk:admire to

RFD discussion: September 2018
Moved to . Per utramque cavernam 10:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

RFM discussion: May 2018–December 2019
Move to. --Per utramque cavernam 13:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 * It may not be as easy as that. Equinox did add a quote, and it seems to be an unusual use of English. DonnanZ (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, but we can very well handle that at . --Per utramque cavernam 15:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

It seems to be possible to use it without "to", so I do think it should be moved (at this point, merged) into admire. - -sche (discuss) 19:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge with admire, as per -sche. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 21:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Moved from RFD. Per utramque cavernam 09:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * IMO, it needs to be cited, before we can know for sure what to do with it. The sense seems quite quite close to that with a grammatically different complement: "Ay, ay,—it is all very well talking; but you shall talk to the constable and the magistrate too, since you don't admire talking to me." DCDuring (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge if it remains undercited and possibly even after. DCDuring (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

 * Merged. - -sche (discuss) 04:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:admire to


text:
Talk:barbecue cottage cheese salad

RFD discussion: May–September 2018
Strikes me as SoP. S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 12:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * How can you barbecue cottage cheese? Sounds horrible, anyway. SemperBlotto (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It sounds revolting, but not SoP since the word "sauce" has been omitted from barbecue sauce. Looking through b.g.c, however, I'm not convinced it's attestable. Move to RFV, perhaps? —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 13:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

 * I would be tempted to nuke it, bearing in mind there is no entry for cottage cheese salad anyway, but RFV is probably the best solution. DonnanZ (talk) 09:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ... and perhaps someone would like to provide an image for ... DonnanZ (talk) 09:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Lol, very classy! --Per utramque cavernam 20:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

 * Nuke it, eh? Sounds even more delicious. Equinox ◑ 21:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per utramque cavernam 13:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Struck, and I've sent it to RFV:. Per utramque cavernam 09:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It looks probably SoP to me barbecue + cottage cheese salad. Cottage cheese salad occurs with numerous different modifiers, eg. peach-, molded, lime, pineapple(-) (all from Books); quinoa-, blueberry, guava (from News). barbecue seems like a normal, imprecise modifier, certainly suggestive of barbecue sauce in a US context. DCDuring (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

RFV discussion: September–October 2018
See. Per utramque cavernam 09:48, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:barbecue cottage cheese salad


text:
Talk:baby on board

RFD discussion: March–September 2018
Not lexical, doesn't make sense as a translation target. DTLHS (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Dunno about translations, but the wp article is interesting. DonnanZ (talk) 11:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per the proponent. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 14:29, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

 * Isn't this also used, idiomatically, to refer to being pregnant? bd2412 T 21:43, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know- any evidence? DTLHS (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, there is, from Wikipedia: "Following popular request and trials in 2005, Transport for London (TfL) began issuing badges with the TfL logo and the words "Baby on board!" to pregnant women travelling on the London Underground, to help other passengers identify pregnant commuters who would like to be offered a seat." Sorry, forgot to sign. DonnanZ (talk) 23:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Here's a cite - 2016, Victoria Pade, A Camden's Baby Secret: "And even if there wasn't a baby on board, I'd still be here telling you this and asking you to give me another chance". bd2412 T 22:58, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't doubt the existence of that sense, but I don't see it as idiomatic; it's simply a metaphoric use. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 23:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If so, it is not a transparent metaphor. If I say someone "has a baby", the presumption is that they have given birth to a child. If I say someone "has a baby on board", the addition of "on board" alone changes the meaning to indicate a current pregnancy, which is also not the sense of a vehicle having a baby on board. bd2412 T 17:49, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I didn't understand a word of what you just wrote.
 * = ≈ . "She has a baby on board" = "she has a baby inside [her]". I don't see what's not transparent about it. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Just imagine you're heavily pregnant carrying a baby, if that's possible. You would feel the weight and definitely know you had something "on board". DonnanZ (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm confused, are you answering to me or to BD2412? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You, it's indented after your comment. DonnanZ (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * "On board" is not generally used to mean inside with respect to a living body. Would you refer to kidneys or a liver as being "on board"? bd2412 T 14:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Used in the same jocular way as "baby on board" seems to me to be employed, I wouldn't find it terribly shocking. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 12:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

I'm tending towards Keep here ... maybe. Foremost, there is the metaphorical use "She has a baby on board" = she is pregnant. Was easy to find cites for this. But perhaps that should best be entered as "have a baby on board" - for which the present info about the car sign should be included in the etymology. As for the car sign, well, perhaps an entry for "on board" would cover all the possible variants (I found "dog on board", "cat on board", "camel on board", "Mickey/Minnie on board", ... but did not find "gecko on board", "fish on board", unsurprisingly). - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 10:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not just because it's very SOP, but because it's pretty specifically on signs. Signs aren't things we can or should cite, and most reference to this phrase as the definition is written would be mentioning the content of the signs. PseudoSkull (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pretty obvious sum of parts.  "Dog on board," etc.  Nicole Sharp (talk) 04:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Such an entry already exists, with the definition "on or in a means of transportation". I think perhaps the "have a baby on board" figurative option suggested by Sonofcawdrey is reasonable, especially mentioning it in the etymology; I think otherwise it's definitely SoP.  So Delete; also possibly adding a "have a baby on board" entry to cover the figurative meaning. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 00:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

 * Delete as SoP: + . — SGconlaw (talk) 08:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Deleted, as I see that most editors feel it is SoP. — SGconlaw (talk) 09:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:baby on board


text:
Talk:heterosexual supremacy

RFD discussion: February–September 2018

 * See Talk:white supremacy.

title: Talk:heterosexual supremacy


text:
Talk:white Christian supremacy

RFD discussion: February–September 2018

 * See Talk:white supremacy.

title: Talk:white Christian supremacy


text:
wæterseocnes

Etymology
From or, literally 'water sickness'.

Noun

 * 1) edema

title: wæterseocnes


text:
unclockable

Etymology
From en.

Adjective

 * 1)  Having an odometer that cannot be altered to provide a fake reading.
 * 2) At a speed that cannot be measured.
 * 3) At a time that cannot be measured or identified.
 * 4) Being undetectably homosexual.
 * 5)  Not recognizable as transgender or a drag performer; passing.
 * 6)  Unreadable; undetectable.
 * 1) At a time that cannot be measured or identified.
 * 2) Being undetectably homosexual.
 * 3)  Not recognizable as transgender or a drag performer; passing.
 * 4)  Unreadable; undetectable.
 * 1) Being undetectably homosexual.
 * 2)  Not recognizable as transgender or a drag performer; passing.
 * 3)  Unreadable; undetectable.
 * 1)  Not recognizable as transgender or a drag performer; passing.
 * 2)  Unreadable; undetectable.
 * 1)  Not recognizable as transgender or a drag performer; passing.
 * 2)  Unreadable; undetectable.
 * 1)  Unreadable; undetectable.
 * 1)  Unreadable; undetectable.
 * 1)  Unreadable; undetectable.
 * 1)  Unreadable; undetectable.

title: unclockable


text:
Talk:reqest

RFD discussion: September 2018
Some day I should organise a large-scale vote about which misspellings are keep-worthy and which are not. But for now: it is well understood that English q only occurs in qu (apart from Semitic loans). This is a low-effort entry (one citation across two parts of speech) for a trivially obvious misspelling or typo. It just makes us look stupid. Equinox ◑ 03:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Ugh, delete for nominator's reasons. — SGconlaw (talk) 04:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's been here ten years too many. DonnanZ (talk) 09:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, looks like a typo, which is even worse. Per utramque cavernam 09:16, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * deleted (surely misspellings should be treated like other words as far as cfi is concerned). SemperBlotto (talk) 09:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:reqest


text:
Talk:Schlieffen

RFD discussion: July–September 2018
Allegedly an English proper noun, undefined. The quote appears to be using an author's name as a metonym for their work, and it's clearly a German surname. Jonathan Hall (talk) 12:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

 * I would delete this. I could say "refer to Haugen" when talking about Einar Haugen's Norwegian-English Dictionary. The same sort of thing, I think. DonnanZ (talk) 13:47, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Unless it can be proven to be a surname used in English. DonnanZ (talk) 14:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

 * Delete or define it as a surname. Compare recent Tea Room discussion of author as in "read the Greek authors", meaning their works. It's transparent. - -sche (discuss) 20:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, or surname, as above. This kind of usage (the dictionary usage DonnanZ mentioned, or the related habit of saying things like "The wording in the Latin is such, but the working in the Greek is so.") seems like a weird form of either synecdoche or ellipsis. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 14:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * In similar cases we assert keep with the rationale (silly, IMO) that the pronunciation is typically different for speakers in different languages. Are we explicitly rejecting that rationale or just ignoring it? Does this petard belong to anyone in this discussion? DCDuring (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * That's true of the surname itself, though, and not just the "book by Schlieffen" sense, which is still unidiomatic synecdoche of sorts. It's true in general of any word in one language that speakers of another language encounter. - -sche (discuss) 04:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Sense deleted. bd2412 T 13:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Schlieffen


text:
Talk:war of attrition

RFD discussion: June–September 2018
WF created this already knowing somebody would RFD it. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Once upon a time I started automatically deleting WF entries that were just rfdef, so he started putting cites in. The only thing WF ever reads is the back page of the Sun where it says "GO ON MY SUN: KANE SMASHES BALL INTO NET". So now he creates stupid "figurative sports language" entries of this kind. This is a hugely common phrase but the meaning is pretty obvious from the parts (cf. "war of espionage", "war of stealth"). So weak delete. Equinox ◑ 04:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

 * In other WF news I wish to thank the IP who finally bit the bullet today and removed WF's "woman who microwaved a kitten" citation from the kitten entry. Where can we get IPs who want to add citations? Equinox ◑ 04:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * In this case rfdef was replaced by Semper. There's plenty of "war of" entries though, abstain for now . DonnanZ (talk) 08:04, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Oh my, LOL! That has only just been removed! --Harmonicaplayer (talk) 08:09, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * And from now on I'll endeavour to add a wider range of quotes. The Telegraph's sports articles are never as well-written as the Guardian's. --Harmonicaplayer (talk) 08:09, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Delete as SoP. — SGconlaw (talk) 07:03, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Keep, despite bad-faith creation. A very common collocation which might well be considered a set phrase. Ƿidsiþ 19:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WT:LEMMING: in oxforddictionaries.com and dictionary.cambridge.org. Note, however, that the dictionaries have a somewhat different definition. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. The definition we have is not one I'm familiar with. I've only ever heard of the one given by the two dictionaries Dan links to. I don't think "war of attrition" is truly deducible from "war" and "attrition." None of the definitions we have for the latter cover the specific sense used in the phrase. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

 * Keep per DP (changed from abstain). DonnanZ (talk) 10:04, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Andrew Sheedy. John Cross (talk) 07:59, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Kept. Per utramque cavernam 10:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:war of attrition


text:
Talk:disease-free

RFD discussion: June–September 2018
Free of disease. DTLHS (talk) 16:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 17:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, per lemming principle. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, along with all other hyphenated adjectives and verbs. They count as one word. DonnanZ (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Something doesn't become includable just because you've declared it a word. That's a circular argument and you should stop making it. DTLHS (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

 * To be fair, I didn't invent the word. I did find a couple of hits on Google Books for disease free; diseasefree can also be found, some are scannos for disease-free, but I did find one instance of diseasefree and disease-free both occurring in the same article. Looking at CFI, I don't think anything in there goes against this word. DonnanZ (talk) 22:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That's true. I really think we need to agree on something that can be written down in CFI that applies to hyphenated compounds. DTLHS (talk) 22:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you do that, you have to bear in mind that certain words are more likely to be hyphenated in British English than in American English, one exception is seamfree for some reason. DonnanZ (talk) 22:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed about somehow codifying CFI on hyphenated words. They play so many semantic roles and enjoy such broad productivity that I think it behoves us to have a consistent policy as to when they count and when they do not. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 00:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I would suggest as a first step a provision that phrases which are hyphenated due to being used attributively should be treated as if the hyphens were spaces for purposes of determining whether they're SOP. That would prevent deletion of hyphenated true compounds and of all phrases that are idiomatic, but would get rid of the "it-must-be-a-single-word-because-it's-hyphenated" argument (yes, I did that on purpose...)  . It wouldn't cover this type of construction, but it would be relatively easy to apply, and it might be accepted by some who would object to a more sweeping proposal. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that's prudent--it begins address the problem of any-word-can-be-made-up-with-a-hyphen-ism, but cautiously and only in a narrow sphere. From there at some point we can move maybe to illegitimate uses of suffixes using hyphens (like the one I just used), to separate them from legitimate ones somehow (as Donnanz mentions below). --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 13:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

 * A good yardstick is whether a term appears in a reputable online dictionary, as does. If it doesn't, more thought has to be put into whether it is entry-worthy or not. The attributive-only argument doesn't always work with hyphenated adjectives, see  which is also an adverb. DonnanZ (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that lemming principle reminds me of the above discussion about "ever-X" words. Which dictionary did you find had disease-free? --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 18:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Oxford Online, the reference has been there since day 1. DonnanZ (talk) 19:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't know how I missed it. I'll accept the lemming principle here. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Delete this and all "X-free" where the meaning is no more than "free of/from X". This is a regular formation from -free. weed-free, football-free, buffalo-free ... the list is virtually limitless. Mihia (talk) 02:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * words-formulated-with--free-free... --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I would like to include weed-free as it is quite common. I have been spending time lately tackling the weeds in my own garden. DonnanZ (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Is being common or uncommon a factor in the decision to include an entry? Mihia (talk) 02:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not uncommon to see DonnanZ give some detail about their personal connection to the thing referred to as a reason to keep the phrase referring to it. Sometimes I wonder if they look in the mirror to see what the weather's like outside... Chuck Entz (talk) 03:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, the possibilities are endless, giraffe-free, idiot-free, traffic-free, Irish-free, it's knowing where to draw the line. We should refrain from joining -free compounds up in an effort to get round the problem, as I suspect has happened in the past. DonnanZ (talk) 07:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Unlike weed-free, the other two terms do not appear attested, and attestation is a prerequisite regardless of sum of parts: . --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The world does not begin and end with 'Ngram' viewer, and, in any case, as explained in the docs, "we only consider ngrams that occur in at least 40 books". That's 40 books. It is easy to find examples of "buffalo-free" and "football-free". You can start by searching for "buffalo-free zone" and "football-free zone". Mihia (talk) 02:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Keep (I consider hyphenated compounds to be single words). Ƿidsiþ 07:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * So you would support an entry for "buffalo-free", defined as "free of/from buffalos"? Mihia (talk) 01:32, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I mean I wouldn't add something like that, but if someone else had, and it had three citations, then yes. Ƿidsiþ 06:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Keep (per Ƿidsith) Leasnam (talk) 20:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WT:COALMINE, if we believe . As for whether something being a word matters: WT:CFI, "... of including a term if it is attested and, when that is met, if it is a single word or it is idiomatic", italics on "single" mine. The WT:LEMMING card can be played with the help of oxforddictionaries.com. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Kept. (sigh) Per utramque cavernam 10:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:disease-free


text:
Talk:make a mistake

RFD discussion: June–September 2018
Sum of parts, IMO. Created by WF with comment of "common collocation", which isn't inherently enough for an entry. Move translations over to, and maybe move Thesaurus:make a mistake to Thesaurus:err as well? – Julia ☺ • formerly Gormflaith • 12:55, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Abstain. At Votes/pl-2018-03/Including translation hubs, the last rule states that "The existence of a rare single-word English synonym of the considered English term does not disqualify the considered English term". While I'm not too keen on those translation targets, I think this one is all right ( isn't rare, but it's not the most common term either, I'd say). But whatever the outcome, let's put all the translations in a single place.
 * However, I oppose moving the Thesaurus entry. Per utramque cavernam 13:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * According to, general dictionaries don't have this, though I've found usage examples at entries for make in some I've looked at. One legal dictionary offers a list of synonyms (presumably to help lawyers write more formal-sounding briefs); McGraw-Hill idioms has it; and WordNet (a semantic net-based reference, more conceptual than dictionaries) too. I'd say this represents close to the outer limit of what I'd call entryworthy. There are many synonyms for mistake that can be found (eg, error, faux pas, blunder, ?miscue); additionally many specialized hyponyms (eg, wild pitch, foul). I think a usage note indicating that there are numerous terms that substitute for mistake and a reference to a specific definition of make, such as MWOnline's "14a: to produce as a result of action, effort, or behavior with respect to something" make a mess of the job; tried to make a thorough job of it. I don't think we actually have a definition of make that fits make a mistake ("err"), make a throw ("throw"), make a turn ("turn"). DCDuring (talk) 15:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Sense 1.3 "to bring about" might fit. It has "to make trouble" as one of its usexes, which seems to be in the family of the ones you mentioned. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 15:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I added a clause to that sense which might clarify its use as well, and may cover the usage mentioned above. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Maybe. Usually I would say that we need a substitutable definition, but I doubt that we can do that for the most common senses of make. (MWOnline's definition seems awkward when substituted as well.) In make a throw (or mistake, turn, about-face, leap, attempt), there is an element of performance, rather than creation. DCDuring (talk) 17:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That's true. I'm inclined to treat the "to perform a feat" sense of make as a separate sense from the effect, bring about sense.  There are a lot of instances of it: make a pass, make a goal, make an attempt, make a start, make a basket (as in basketball), make a turn, make a leap, make a jump, make a feat, make a stop, etc. I might add a sense for that. Make a mistake could arguably belong to either sense. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Delete, along with everything else that WF ever made. --Harmonicaplayer (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * :-| Julia ☺ ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 12:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * New proposal: Keep as a translation hub; move translations over; keep thesaurus entry. Now that there's a sense at  I think it should be good. (thanks PUC for this idea, and StMin for the sense) – Julia ☺  ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 12:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Nobody's used that abbreviation before--I love it. :) --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That seems reasonable to me--I can get behind that.--SanctMinimalicen (talk) 13:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

 * A tentative keep. It can be compared with . DonnanZ (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * seems more idiomatic, though–it only refers to a certain type of mistake, and I feel like it would be a bit odd if used as a command in a more literal sense: "Make no mistake! Read very carefully, please." – Julia ☺ ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 15:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed--it may have originated more literally, but now the idiomatic "believe me" kind of meaning is well departed from a literal injunction not to err--whereas "make a mistake" is simply literal. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 15:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Kept, the consensus seems to be that it should be a translation target / isn't totally useless. I don't see a consensus for deletion in any case. Per utramque cavernam 09:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:make a mistake


text:
Talk:黃祖

RFD discussion: June–August 2018
We don't include full names of specific individuals on Wiktionary. ---> Tooironic (talk) 05:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:09, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:黃祖


text:
Talk:持てる

RFD discussion: March–September 2018
Does anyone actually use this kanji spelling?? —suzukaze (t・c) 18:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * would suggest, "yes". ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 19:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I should have been more specific. I meant, as the "right" spelling of モテる. —suzukaze (t・c) 21:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you. :)   Scanning through the googits, it looks like there may be a sense distinction happening when writers use the katakana spelling.  I'm not that up on slang-y usage, however.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 21:28, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * This spelling is attested but should be marked as dated: [//www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22女に持てたい%22&oq=%22女に持てたい%22]. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 12:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 03:57, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:持てる


text:
Talk:ataque sorpresa

RFD discussion: January–August 2018
Looks SOP to me. Not sure what WF was smoking on Christmas Day when making this --Gente como tú (talk) 11:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 16:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 02:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

 * RFD deleted S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 22:44, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

RFD discussion: December 2020
Original discussion: Talk:ataque sorpresa

 * Undelete >SOP — Dentonius 19:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted <SOP —Mahāgaja · talk 19:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted =SOP — Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

, what's your opinion, SUC? — Dentonius 20:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep deleted. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  08:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted. Imetsia (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted. — فين أخاي ( تكلم معاي · ما ساهمت ) 18:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)5
 * Keep deleted, stinks of SoP. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:54, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Snowball close. Overwhelming consensus for this to remain deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:ataque sorpresa


text:
Talk:очень-очень

RFD discussion: April–August 2018
You can repeat any adverb like this. Guldrelokk (talk) 02:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Also: быстро-быстро, долго-долго, много-много. Guldrelokk (talk) 02:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * много-много says it also has the unpredictable meaning "at most". If so, it should be retained. Benwing2 (talk) 03:36, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * It surprisingly does. Should be marked obsolete. Guldrelokk (talk) 05:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I've done so, and removed the RFD tag. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 18:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Does this (adv)-(adv) pattern actually find use with many adverbs, or only with a small set of adverbs? If the latter, I would keep the entry; to me, the use of hyphen is surprising, and thus worth documenting. As a hint, note that ru:очень-очень exists. Created by Benwing2. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The former. Guldrelokk (talk) 23:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, in Russian reduplicated words are always written with a hyphen, no matter what they are, this is an orthographic rule without exceptions. Guldrelokk (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per Guldrelokk. Per utramque cavernam 08:38, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

 * Delete per our Russian-speaking editors. - -sche (discuss) 06:15, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

 * Delete. Fay Freak (talk) 00:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

 * RFD deleted S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 22:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:очень-очень


text:
Talk:המזון

RFD discussion: August 2018
Isn't this SOP in Hebrew? S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 10:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

 * I'm pretty sure that at present we don't include definite forms of Hebrew words. Deleted. —  [ זכריה קהת ] Zack. — 11:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:המזון


text:
Talk:それが人生

RFD discussion: March–September 2018
It’s attested, of course, but it’s not used in the same way as such is life. It is rather a literal translation of  or that's life. The phrase actually used in such situation is or. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 02:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

 * (User:Haplology, 2013: . —suzukaze (t・c) 00:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC))

 * Delete I've never heard this, and it seems likely to be a translation of  as T AKASUGI Shinji points out. It's not to be found in dictionaries. --Ornilnas (talk) 05:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Deleted. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 03:57, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:それが人生


text:
Talk:die Arme in die Seite gestemmt

RFD discussion: March–August 2018

 * See Talk:die Arme in die Hüften gestemmt.

title: Talk:die Arme in die Seite gestemmt


text:
kaatser

Noun

 * 1) Frisian handball player

title: kaatser


text:
wæteradl

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) edema, dropsy

title: wæteradl


text: snufset

title: snufset


text: snufsende

title: snufsende


text:
Talk:み

Format -- shouldn't this be the lemma page?
Per other related discussions, the emerging consensus is that wago terms should use the kana pages for the lemmata entries. However, as of, this page is mostly a redirect to the kanji pages. This is suboptimal, not least as the mi readings for both and  are cognates with significant sense overlap, the mi honorific is cognate with, , and many of these have more than one kanji rendering (such as prefix mi appearing also as  and even ).

Would anyone oppose turning things around and having the kanji entries point here instead? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 21:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I created them as placeholders. Of course it would be the most logical if wago terms are lemmatized here. I'm also thinking about having a template like this:

Prefix

 * The template can be used for listing kanji spellings of a wago as well as anchoring, so (1) み links to the relevant section directly in a list of homographs and (2) can fetch glosses and copy categories from only relevant sections of the lemma page. --Dine2016 (talk) 01:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:み


text:
heathwren

Noun

 * 1) Any of the birds in genus  (sometimes included in ), native to Australia.

title: heathwren


text: Thesaurus:remain

title: Thesaurus:remain


text:
Hylacola

Hyponyms

 * ,  - accepted species

title: Hylacola


text:
nesespray

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) nasal spray

title: nesespray


text: ceremoniall

title: ceremoniall


text:
speckled warbler

Noun

 * 1) A warbler of species, native to Australia.

title: speckled warbler


text: ἄγουσα

title: ἄγουσα


text: βεβηκυῖα

title: βεβηκυῖα


text: originall

title: originall


text: cleer

title: cleer


text: nesesprayen

title: nesesprayen


text: Chthonicola sagittatus

title: Chthonicola sagittatus


text: cleers

title: cleers


text: cleering

title: cleering


text: cleered

title: cleered


text: cleerer

title: cleerer


text: cleerest

title: cleerest


text: Greeke

title: Greeke


text: nesesprayer

title: nesesprayer


text: schooleman

title: schooleman


text: schoolemen

title: schoolemen


text: nesesprayene

title: nesesprayene


text:
بيلسان

Etymology
The form belongs to the root  with meanings related to indigestion, nausea, disgust. Via the idea of luxury, abundance, and indulgence; to overeat, over-indulge, to be surfeit, this compares to the contronymic significance of the root associated with.

Compare 🇨🇬,, , , 🇨🇬, , , other 🇨🇬 / , related to a profuse root /  forming meanings concerning sweetness, joy, pleasure, and also feasting.

Such meanings root in a plant name,, possibly borrowed early into from , while all other forms of this Arabic plant name are from.

Noun

 * 1)  gen. et spp., syns. Balsamodendron,
 * 2)  gen. et spp.
 * 3)  (black elder, tree and fruit)
 * , especially

title: بيلسان


text: بلسان

title: بلسان


text: بشام

title: بشام


text:
بلسم

Noun

 * 1) the resin obtained of such a plant, balsam, balm
 * 1) the resin obtained of such a plant, balsam, balm

title: بلسم


text:
ترنجان

Etymology
because it resembles the citron olfactorily and texturally.

Noun

 * 1) lemon balm (Melissa gen. et spp.)

Derived terms

 * and
 * and

title: ترنجان


text: Category:ar:Ericales order plants

title: Category:ar:Ericales order plants


text: Category:ar:Moschatel family plants

title: Category:ar:Moschatel family plants


text:
مرزنجوش

Etymology
Directly from.

title: مرزنجوش


text:
nasal spray

Noun

 * 1) a spray medication used as a decongestant when inhaled through the nose.

Translations

 * Finnish:
 * Hungarian:
 * Norwegian:
 * Bokmål: nesespray
 * Nynorsk: nasespray

title: nasal spray


text: nasal sprays

title: nasal sprays


text: Citations:don't cry for me, Argentina

title: Citations:don't cry for me, Argentina


text:
碾碎

Verb

 * 1) to pulverize; to crush

title: 碾碎


text:
User:Shenme/common.css

/* table.mw-collapsed tr { display: none; }

/* .client-js .mw-collapsed:not(.mw-made-collapsible) > p, .client-js .mw-collapsed:not(.mw-made-collapsible) > table, .client-js .mw-collapsed:not(.mw-made-collapsible) > thead + tbody, .client-js .mw-collapsed:not(.mw-made-collapsible) tr:not(:first-child), .client-js .mw-collapsed:not(.mw-made-collapsible) .mw-collapsible-content { display: none }

.client-js .mw-collapsed > p, .client-js .mw-collapsed > table, .client-js .mw-collapsed > thead + tbody, .client-js .mw-collapsed tr:not(:first-child), .client-js .mw-collapsed .mw-collapsible-content { display: none }

title: User:Shenme/common.css


text:
Talk:fodha

The etymology section says fodha comes from fo + e. This is not correct. Morphologically, fodha represents fo + e for all synchronic purposes, but etymology is diacrhonic. A correct etymology would show fodha coming from its predecessor in Old Irish, from a reconstructed predecessor in proto-celtic, and then say that THAT is a conflation of the predecessors of fo and e. I don't have the books in front of me that would show what those older forms are, but I'll bet that if we had them, we would also have an explanation of how fodha comes to have a -dh- in the middle. This is a criticism of ALL the Wiktionary etymologies of Gaelic prepositional pronouns. --Doric Loon (talk) 23:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:fodha