text:
təşəbbüskar

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) initiator

Adjective

 * 1) initiative, having/taking the initiative, full of initiative
 * 2) enterprising, businesslike

title: təşəbbüskar


text:
təşəbbüskarlıq

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) initiative, enterprise willingness to take the initiative, especially in business

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: təşəbbüskarlıq


text:
Alta Còrsega

Proper noun

 * 1) Haute-Corse

title: Alta Còrsega


text: Costa d'Or

title: Costa d'Or


text: Droma

title: Droma


text:
Eure i Loir

Proper noun

 * 1) Eure-et-Loir

title: Eure i Loir


text: Finisterre

title: Finisterre


text:
多姿多彩

Idiom

 * 1) varied and colorful; splendid; diversity (of forms and colors); elegant and graceful posture

title: 多姿多彩


text: Alta Garona

title: Alta Garona


text: duōzīduōcǎi

title: duōzīduōcǎi


text:
plank up

Verb

 * 1)  To pay (an amount of money in cash).

title: plank up


text:
plank down

Verb

 * 1)  To pay (an amount of money in cash).

title: plank down


text:
yift

Etymology
From. .

Noun

 * 1)  a gift

title: yift


text:
ora-bura

Adverb

 * 1) hither and thither
 * 2) around
 * 1) around

title: ora-bura


text:
Garona

Proper noun

 * 1) Garonne

title: Garona


text: Category:ca:Rivers in France

title: Category:ca:Rivers in France


text: Category:it:Rivers in France

title: Category:it:Rivers in France


title: Template:R:trk:Clauson:2002


text:
каллӗ-маллӗ

Adverb

 * 1) hither and thither
 * 2) back and forth

title: каллӗ-маллӗ


text: Template:R:trk:Clauson:2002/documentation


text:
Loira Atlàntic

Proper noun

 * 1) Loire-Atlantique

title: Loira Atlàntic


text: Category:az:Animal sounds

title: Category:az:Animal sounds


text:
ӑлах

Verb

 * 1) to neigh
 * 2) to court, to hit on, to run after girls

title: ӑлах


text:
kişnərti

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) neigh

title: kişnərti


text:
Appendix:Quenya/hanu

Noun

 * 1) a male (whether human, elf, animal etc.)

title: Appendix:Quenya/hanu


text:
Appendix:Quenya/haran

Noun

 * 1) a king

title: Appendix:Quenya/haran


text: torcie

title: torcie


text:
Appendix:Quenya/haranyë

Noun

 * 1) last year of a century for the Numenoreans

title: Appendix:Quenya/haranyë


text:
Appendix:Quenya/harda

Noun

 * 1) realm, region

title: Appendix:Quenya/harda


text:
Appendix:Quenya/harin

Adjective

 * 1) marred

Usage notes
Curiously, Tolkien spells it as χarin

title: Appendix:Quenya/harin


text:
kişnəmək

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to neigh

title: kişnəmək


text:
varmekolbe

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) an immersion heater (heating element)

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) an immersion heater (heating element)

title: varmekolbe


text: Category:Azerbaijani terms suffixed with -ti


text:
Appendix:Quenya/harma

Noun

 * 1) treasure, a treasured thing

title: Appendix:Quenya/harma


text:
Appendix:Quenya/hyarmen

Noun

 * 1) south
 * 2) name of a tengwa letter

Usage notes
This letter is only used before vowels, elsewhere is used.

title: Appendix:Quenya/hyarmen


text:
Appendix:Quenya/harna

Adjective

 * 1) wounded

title: Appendix:Quenya/harna


text:
Appendix:Quenya/harpa

Noun

 * 1) helmet

title: Appendix:Quenya/harpa


text:
Talk:earthpea

Is hog peanut a synonym? Equinox ◑ 20:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:earthpea


text:
Appendix:Quenya/haryon

Noun

 * 1) (heir), prince

title: Appendix:Quenya/haryon


text: Hiong-san

title: Hiong-san


text: ogara

title: ogara


text:
Appendix:Quenya/hatal

Noun

 * 1) spear

title: Appendix:Quenya/hatal


text:
Appendix:Quenya/hatsë

Noun

 * 1) headlong movement

title: Appendix:Quenya/hatsë


text:
faemön

Verb

 * 1)  to be hungry

title: faemön


text:
Appendix:Quenya/haura

Adjective

 * 1) huge

title: Appendix:Quenya/haura


text: faem

title: faem


text:
Appendix:Quenya/háya

Adjective

 * 1) far off, far away

title: Appendix:Quenya/háya


text: evangelicanism

title: evangelicanism


text: evangelican

title: evangelican


text: evangelicans

title: evangelicans


text:
Chatham House Rule

Etymology
Named after the headquarters of the UK Royal Institute of International Affairs, based in, London, where the rule originated in June 1927.

Proper noun

 * 1) A rule, applied to some controversial debates and discussion panels, stating that anybody who attends is free to use information from the discussion, but cannot reveal who made any comment.

title: Chatham House Rule


text:
antistall

Adjective

 * 1) Preventing the stalling of an engine.

title: antistall


text:
antistalling

Adjective

 * 1) Preventing the stalling of an engine.

title: antistalling


text:
get along with you

Interjection

 * Get along with you! You must be joking!
 * Get along with you! You must be joking!

title: get along with you


text: get on with you

title: get on with you


text: go on with you

title: go on with you


text: 赤马港

title: 赤马港


text:
Dactylorhiza

Etymology
From +.

Hypernyms

 * ; - subfamily;  - tribe;  - subtribe

Hyponyms

 * - type species

title: Dactylorhiza


text:
finger-and-toe

Noun

 * 1) The plant disease clubroot.

title: finger-and-toe


text: 赤馬港

title: 赤馬港


text:
Talk:Dactylorhiza

But see also Talk:anbury. Equinox ◑ 21:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:Dactylorhiza


text: varmekolben

title: varmekolben


text:
พรูติ

Verb

 * 1)  (“to say”)

title: พรูติ


text: varmekolber

title: varmekolber


text: głusz

title: głusz


text:
scrutin d'arrondissement

Noun

 * 1)  a system of election in France where the voter voted only for a local candidate or candidates

title: scrutin d'arrondissement


text: głuszy

title: głuszy


text: varmekolbene

title: varmekolbene


text:
anqırmaq

Etymology
Possibly from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to bray
 * 2)  to roar
 * 3)  to yell, to bawl, to scream

title: anqırmaq


text: varmekolbar

title: varmekolbar


text:
allergologic

Adjective

 * 1)  Relating to the study and treatment of allergies.

title: allergologic


text:
anqırtı

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bray
 * 2) roar
 * 3) yell, to bawl, to scream

title: anqırtı


text:
allergologically

Adverb

 * 1) In terms of allergology.

title: allergologically


text: varmekolbane

title: varmekolbane


text:
cieng

Etymology 1
Probably from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) first month of the Chinese calendar
 * 2) Chinese New Year; Spring Festival

Verb

 * 1) to reveal; to leak; to inform

title: cieng


text: puści

title: puści


text:
line fish

Noun

 * 1) Fish caught by line fishing.
 * 2) * 1880, New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council, Journal (volume 30, part 3, page 460)
 * The tailor — is that a sea fish — a line fish? It is a sea fish, but not a line fish. They will bite at a line, but they are not a fish you can depend on with the line.

title: line fish


text: line fishes

title: line fishes


text:
keskikasti

Noun

 * 1) something that is average, something in an intermediate range or the middle rather than at the top or the bottom, often on a scale of some kind

title: keskikasti


text: puszczą

title: puszczą


text: puszczę

title: puszczę


text:
glabrously

Adverb

 * 1) In a glabrous manner; without hair.

title: glabrously


text: puszcze

title: puszcze


text: puszcz

title: puszcz


text:
have a head on one's shoulders

Verb

 * 1) To have good sense or judgement.

Translations

 * Polish:

title: have a head on one's shoulders


text: puszczy

title: puszczy


text: puszczo

title: puszczo


text: Havisham

title: Havisham


text: pustemu

title: pustemu


text: pełnemu

title: pełnemu


text:
Talk:panthalassic

RFV discussion: May 2019
"Panthalassic Ocean" exists, but does "panthalassic" (with a small "p") exist with the given meaning? — 92.4.50.112 05:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes. DTLHS (talk) 06:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 02:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:panthalassic


text: pełnymi

title: pełnymi


text: pustymi

title: pustymi


text: pustym

title: pustym


text: pełnym

title: pełnym


text:
へんしゅう

Noun

 * 1)  editing

title: へんしゅう


text: henshū

title: henshū


text: 谢师宴

title: 谢师宴


text:
謝師宴

Noun

 * 1) teacher appreciation banquet

title: 謝師宴


text:
ҫӗркаҫ

Adverb

 * 1) last night

title: ҫӗркаҫ


text:
word to conjure with

Noun

 * 1) Any word that gives the impression of something important or exciting.

title: word to conjure with


text: words to conjure with

title: words to conjure with


text:
ӗнер

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) yesterday

title: ӗнер


text:
кӗҫӗр

Adverb

 * 1) tonight

title: кӗҫӗр


text:
konverteringstabell

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a conversion table

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a conversion table

title: konverteringstabell


text:
misfact

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A wrong or untrue piece of information.
 * 2)  Misinformation.
 * 1)  Misinformation.
 * 1)  Misinformation.

title: misfact


text: misfacts

title: misfacts


text: 陆水湖

title: 陆水湖


text: 陸水湖

title: 陸水湖


text:
بدنوس

Etymology
From Greek.

Noun

 * 1) kind of grouse

title: بدنوس


text:
بدنی

Etymology
From.

Pronunciation
..–

Adjective

 * 1) physical, corporal, somatic.
 * 2) corporeal, bodily.
 * 3) (learned) fat, bulky, corpulent.

Descendants
Turkish: bedenî

title: بدنی


text: konverteringstabellen

title: konverteringstabellen


text: 赵李桥

title: 赵李桥


text: 趙李橋

title: 趙李橋


text: 茶庵岭

title: 茶庵岭


text:
بدنه

Etymology
From Arabic.

Noun

 * 1) (learned) fat camel or ox sacrificed at Mecca in discharge of a vow.

title: بدنه


text: 茶庵嶺

title: 茶庵嶺


text: 柳山湖

title: 柳山湖


text:
بدنا

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) physically
 * 2)  in person; personally

title: بدنا


text:
טענה

Noun

 * 1) proposition, claim, argument

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) proposition, claim, argument
 * 2) complaint

title: טענה


text: 官塘驿

title: 官塘驿


text: 官塘驛

title: 官塘驛


text:
بدست

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) span measure

title: بدست


text:
การพัฒนา

Etymology
+.

Noun

 * : progress; development

title: การพัฒนา


text:
elf-shot

Noun

 * 1) An elf arrow; elf arrows.

Adjective

 * 1)  Maliciously wounded or sickened as a result of having been shot by an elf.

title: elf-shot


text: elf-shots

title: elf-shots


text:
shrinking frog

Etymology
So called because it is larger as a tadpole than as an adult frog.

Noun

 * 1) paradoxical frog

title: shrinking frog


text: shrinking frogs

title: shrinking frogs


text: lrnd.

title: lrnd.


text:
pustać

Noun

 * 1)  wasteland
 * 2) heath, heathland

title: pustać


text:
happy dispatch

Noun

 * 1)  The act of hara-kiri.

title: happy dispatch


text:
bedensel

Etymology
Neologism. Equivalent to.

Adjective

 * 1) physical, corporeal.

title: bedensel


text: happy dispatches

title: happy dispatches


text: happy despatch

title: happy despatch


text: happy despatches

title: happy despatches


text:
straight-cut

Adjective

 * 1) Of tobacco: cut lengthwise of the leaf.

title: straight-cut


text:
głuszak

Noun

 * 1) capercaillie hatchling

title: głuszak


text: mid-sizes

title: mid-sizes


text: midsizes

title: midsizes


text:
nubbiness

Noun

 * 1) The state or condition of being nubby.

title: nubbiness


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/telkʷ-

Root

 * 1) to talk

Derived terms

 * *tlokʷ-
 * *tlokʷ-e-tor
 * *tl̥kʷ-os
 * Unsorted formations:
 * (or from )
 * *tlokʷ-e-tor
 * *tl̥kʷ-os
 * Unsorted formations:
 * (or from )
 * Unsorted formations:
 * (or from )
 * (or from )
 * (or from )
 * (or from )


text: nontaxables

title: nontaxables


text: non-taxables

title: non-taxables


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2019/June 7


text: nonsteroidals

title: nonsteroidals


text:
nonsociety

Noun

 * 1) A group or organization that is not a society.

title: nonsociety


text: nonsocieties

title: nonsocieties


text:
nonsocialized

Adjective

 * 1) Not socialized.

title: nonsocialized


text:
nonforfeiting

Adjective

 * 1) Not forfeiting.

title: nonforfeiting


text: nonroutines

title: nonroutines


text: nonrestraints

title: nonrestraints


text: nonresistants

title: nonresistants


text:
nonrepresentationalism

Noun

 * 1)  A nonrepresentational approach to art.
 * 2)  A philosophical approach denying that something is representational.

title: nonrepresentationalism


text: 禹王

title: 禹王


text: noncontacts

title: noncontacts


text: non-contacts

title: non-contacts


text: 堵城

title: 堵城


text:
noncooperationist

Noun

 * 1) One who refuses to cooperate as a matter of policy.

title: noncooperationist


text: noncooperationists

title: noncooperationists


text: ikry

title: ikry


text: 陈策楼

title: 陈策楼


text:
nonelectronics

Adjective

 * 1) Not being or relating to electronics.

title: nonelectronics


text: 陳策樓

title: 陳策樓


text: ikrze

title: ikrze


text: ikrą

title: ikrą


text: nondegradables

title: nondegradables


text: 陶店

title: 陶店


text: ikrę

title: ikrę


text: ikro

title: ikro


text: nonelectrics

title: nonelectrics


text: nondomestics

title: nondomestics


text: nondominants

title: nondominants


text: Category:Piedmontese prepositions

title: Category:Piedmontese prepositions


text:
nonessentialistic

Adjective

 * 1) Not essentialistic.

title: nonessentialistic


text:
stamp note

Noun

 * 1) A certificate from a custom house officer for goods to be loaded as freight of a ship.

title: stamp note


text: stamp notes

title: stamp notes


text: kukam

title: kukam


text: kukasz

title: kukasz


text: zerka

title: zerka


text:
the whole shop

Noun

 * 1)  The whole lot; everything; the works.

title: the whole shop


text: zerkam

title: zerkam


text: zerkasz

title: zerkasz


text: zerkaj

title: zerkaj


text: kukaj

title: kukaj


text: yīzhōu

title: yīzhōu


text:
chmurzysko

Etymology
From.

title: chmurzysko


text:
chmureczka

Etymology
From.

title: chmureczka


text:
chamera

Etymology
Variation of.

Noun

 * 1) cloud

title: chamera


text:
obłoczek

Etymology
From.

title: obłoczek


text:
pengalaman

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) experience

Noun

 * 1) experience

title: pengalaman


text:
mesin kira

Noun

 * 1) calculator device

title: mesin kira


text:
អភិវឌ្ឍន៍

Etymology
From, equivalent to 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) development; progress

title: អភិវឌ្ឍន៍


text:
perlembagaan

Etymology
Affixed, from.

Noun

 * : the formal or informal system of primary principles and laws that regulates a government or other institutions.
 * : the formal or informal system of primary principles and laws that regulates a government or other institutions.
 * : the formal or informal system of primary principles and laws that regulates a government or other institutions.

Usage notes
The word is part of due to. The Brunei, Malaysia and Singapore usage can be seen in 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  constitution

Usage notes
The word is part of due to. The Indonesian usage can be seen in 🇨🇬.

title: perlembagaan


text: zhíniù

title: zhíniù


text: Chamera

title: Chamera


text: Hamera

title: Hamera


text:
seni bina

Etymology
Compound of 🇰🇲,, probably.

Noun

 * 1) traditional Malay :

Noun

 * 1) architecture

title: seni bina


text:
դոֆամին

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dopamine

title: դոֆամին


text: German Reich

title: German Reich


text:
дофамин

Noun

 * 1) dopamine

title: дофамин


text: guāizhāng

title: guāizhāng


text:
تقاص

Noun

 * 1)  A mutual exercise of the law of reprisal (lex talionis).
 * 2) A mutual exchange of employment or the like.

title: تقاص


text: burzo

title: burzo


text: дофамина

title: дофамина


text: Category:Southern Dagaare lemmas

title: Category:Southern Dagaare lemmas


text: Category:Southern Dagaare interjections

title: Category:Southern Dagaare interjections


text: дофамины

title: дофамины


text: дофаминов

title: дофаминов


text: 瞒哄

title: 瞒哄


text:
瞞哄

Verb

 * 1) to deceive; to hoodwink

title: 瞞哄


text: дофамину

title: дофамину


text: mánhǒng

title: mánhǒng


text: jiànguài

title: jiànguài


text: jiànguàibùguài

title: jiànguàibùguài


text: дофаминам

title: дофаминам


text:
怪罪

Verb

 * 1) to blame; to reproach

title: 怪罪


text: дофамином

title: дофамином


text: guàizuì

title: guàizuì


text: дофамине

title: дофамине


text: zhēngjié

title: zhēngjié


text: дофаминами

title: дофаминами


text: дофаминах

title: дофаминах


text:
โดพามีน

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dopamine

title: โดพามีน


text:
冒煙點

Noun

 * 1)  smoke point

title: 冒煙點


text:
煙點

Noun

 * 1)  smoke point

title: 煙點


text: 冒烟点

title: 冒烟点


text: màoyāndiǎn

title: màoyāndiǎn


text: 烟点

title: 烟点


text: yāndiǎn

title: yāndiǎn


text:
wielwan

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1)  to roll
 * 2)  to join, compound, compose

title: wielwan


text: zhāopìnhuì

title: zhāopìnhuì


text: zhāopìnghuì

title: zhāopìnghuì


text:
שילטן

Verb

 * 1) to curse

title: שילטן


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/welwaną

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) To rob, plunder

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/welwaną


text: שעלטן

title: שעלטן


text:
נעפּ

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) NEP New Economic Policy

title: נעפּ


text: פאַרגאַפן

title: פאַרגאַפן


text:
לײַכטן

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) to illuminate

title: לײַכטן


text:
giống má

Etymology
🇰🇲. Compare.

Noun

 * 1) seed (as used for sowing)

title: giống má


text:
цикнути

Verb

 * 1)  to squeak, yelp (emit a short, high-pitched sound, especially like a mouse)

title: цикнути


text:
цичати

Etymology
From, onomatopoeic in origin.

Verb

 * 1)  to squeak, yelp (emit a short, high-pitched sound, especially like a mouse)
 * 2) * see

title: цичати


text:
nguyên cớ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) reason, cause

title: nguyên cớ


text:
demagoxia

Etymology
From or.

Noun

 * 1) demagogy

title: demagoxia


text: Category:Galician terms suffixed with -ia


text: Category:cu:Rain

title: Category:cu:Rain


text: Category:cu:Water

title: Category:cu:Water


text:
thuộc cấp

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) subordinate

title: thuộc cấp


text: שלײַפן

title: שלײַפן


text: געשליפן

title: געשליפן


text:
געשליפֿענע צונג

Noun

 * 1) gift of the gab

title: געשליפֿענע צונג


text:
demagóxico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) demagogic, demagogical

title: demagóxico


text:
xị

Noun

 * 1) traditional unit of measurement, nowadays usually taken to be one-fourth of a liter
 * 2) a bottle of one-fourth of a liter

title: xị


text:
တိုးတက်

Etymology
+.

Verb

 * 1) to improve; to progress; to advance

title: တိုးတက်


text:
˭

Symbol

 * 1)  Tenuis; a symbol for overtly indicating lack of aspiration.

Usage notes
In speech pathology, this diacritic is used to indicate that a consonant is not aspirated when the target pronunciation is, for example in for the English word "kit," which is normally aspirated. (The aspiration of English words is not usually transcribed.)

It has also been used in linguistic field notes and dictionaries to show that a consonant has been confirmed to be unaspirated. In such cases, words transcribed as ⟨ak˭a⟩ and ⟨akʰa⟩ are known to differ, but in one transcribed ⟨aka⟩ the aspiration is unknown.


text:
lẩn mẩn

Verb

 * 1) to waste one's time with trivialities

title: lẩn mẩn


text:
ခြင်း

Noun

 * 1) basket

title: ခြင်း


text:
တိုးတက်ခြင်း

Etymology
+.

Noun

 * 1) progress; development

title: တိုးတက်ခြင်း


text:
lọc lõi

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) worldly, with life experience

title: lọc lõi


text:
thế chân

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Verb

 * 1) to replace, to succeed

title: thế chân


text:
ĵuĵicuo

Noun

 * 1) jujitsu

title: ĵuĵicuo


text: Category:hsb:Geology

title: Category:hsb:Geology


text: Category:hsb:Earth sciences

title: Category:hsb:Earth sciences


text: mangxo

title: mangxo


text:
số đông

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) majority

title: số đông


text:
tắc tị

Adjective

 * 1) stuck

title: tắc tị


text: Category:hsb:Geography

title: Category:hsb:Geography


text: Category:hsb:Water

title: Category:hsb:Water


text:
phát đạt

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to thrive; to prosper

title: phát đạt


text: Category:hsb:Grains

title: Category:hsb:Grains


text:
hospital psiquiàtric

Noun

 * 1) mental hospital

title: hospital psiquiàtric


text: Category:en:Cities in Nevada, USA

title: Category:en:Cities in Nevada, USA


text: jiàndì

title: jiàndì


text: guānwàng

title: guānwàng


text: Template:R:lic:LHCD

title: Template:R:lic:LHCD


text: Category:Hlai reference templates

title: Category:Hlai reference templates


text: Thesaurus:烹飪

title: Thesaurus:烹飪


text: pēngrènfǎ

title: pēngrènfǎ


text:
ชั่วร้าย

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Adjective

 * 1) bad; wicked; evil.

title: ชั่วร้าย


text: Category:dsb:Fire

title: Category:dsb:Fire


text: yáozhuàn

title: yáozhuàn


text:
ความชั่วร้าย

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * : evil.

title: ความชั่วร้าย


text: guànchuàn

title: guànchuàn


text: Template:R:lic:LYJCJC

title: Template:R:lic:LYJCJC


text:
copcun

Etymology
From (Central Hlai)  +.

Noun

 * 1) rainbow

title: copcun


text:
ชั่วช้า

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Adjective

 * 1) bad; wicked; evil.

title: ชั่วช้า


text: 习用

title: 习用


text:
習用

Verb

 * 1) to use consistently; to practice habitually

title: 習用


text: xíyòng

title: xíyòng


text:
ความชั่วช้า

Etymology
From.

title: ความชั่วช้า


text: Category:hsb:Chemical elements

title: Category:hsb:Chemical elements


text: teiꞌ

title: teiꞌ


text: kèfù

title: kèfù


text:
tsontëchcyaꞌ tsonjndya

Noun

 * 1)  tree

title: tsontëchcyaꞌ tsonjndya


text:
duzdoengz

Etymology
From za. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) rainbow

title: duzdoengz


text:
saidoengz

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) rainbow

title: saidoengz


text: Category:lic:Atmospheric phenomena

title: Category:lic:Atmospheric phenomena


text: Category:lic:Atmosphere

title: Category:lic:Atmosphere


text: tsonjnanꞌ

title: tsonjnanꞌ


text:
Talk:accidente de tráfico

RFD discussion: June 2017–May 2019
SoP. Ultimateria (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. But why do we have road accident? The definition is dubious too. If a bicycle hits a pedestrian on a road, it's a road accident - or am I wrong? --Hekaheka (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I think we should also delete "road accident" (who says that anyway?). Any combination of [setting] + "accident", really. Ultimateria (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * FWIW, Collins defines it as "a traffic accident involving vehicles, pedestrians or cyclists" .--Droigheann (talk) 22:38, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, the components can be linked separately in translation tables. Per utramque cavernam 22:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete --Wonderfool Dec 2018 (talk) 15:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted — surjection ⟨?⟩ 14:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:accidente de tráfico


text:
Talk:accidente laboral

RFD discussion: June 2017–May 2019

 * See Talk:accidente de tráfico.

title: Talk:accidente laboral


text:
فرمل

Etymology
See.

Verb

 * 1) to brake

title: فرمل


text:
ประณาม

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬. Compare 🇨🇬, from which 🇨🇬 is derived.

Verb

 * 1)  to salute, to worship; to praise, to extol.
 * 2) to denounce, to condemn; to banish, to expel.
 * 1) to denounce, to condemn; to banish, to expel.
 * 1) to denounce, to condemn; to banish, to expel.
 * 1) to denounce, to condemn; to banish, to expel.
 * 1) to denounce, to condemn; to banish, to expel.
 * 1) to denounce, to condemn; to banish, to expel.
 * 1) to denounce, to condemn; to banish, to expel.

title: ประณาม


text:
การประณาม

Etymology
From.

title: การประณาม


text: ประนาม

title: ประนาม


text:
ανεμογράφος

Noun

 * 1)  anemograph

title: ανεμογράφος


text:
การประนาม

Etymology
From.

title: การประนาม


text: ανεμογράφου

title: ανεμογράφου


text: ανεμογράφο

title: ανεμογράφο


text: ανεμογράφε

title: ανεμογράφε


text: ανεμογράφων

title: ανεμογράφων


text: ανεμογράφοι

title: ανεμογράφοι


text: ανεμογράφους

title: ανεμογράφους


text:
كبح

Verb

 * 1)  to pull by the bridle, in order that it might stop
 * 2)  to brake

title: كبح


text: sław

title: sław


text: sławę

title: sławę


text: sławy

title: sławy


text: sławie

title: sławie


text: sławo

title: sławo


text: sławom

title: sławom


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/skeldaną

Etymology
From, from with a s-mobile.

Verb

 * 1) to scold

Descendants

 * (attested in )
 * (attested in )
 * (attested in )
 * (attested in )

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/skeldaną


text:
dziodek

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) grandfather

title: dziodek


text:
dziada

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) grandfather

title: dziada


text: 九官鸟

title: 九官鸟


text:
九官鳥

Noun

 * 1) common hill myna

title: 九官鳥


text:
επανακάμπτω

Etymology
. Morphologically, from.

Verb

 * 1)  to return

title: επανακάμπτω


text: επανέκαμψα

title: επανέκαμψα


text: επανακάμψεις

title: επανακάμψεις


text:
wise as an owl

Etymology
Association of owl with wisdom dates back at least to 500 BC in Greece which associated the owl with the Greek goddess of wisdom, Athena.

Adjective

 * 1)  Very wise.

title: wise as an owl


text:
داخ

Verb

 * 1)  to be or become submissive, lowly, humble
 * 2)  to be or become dizzy, giddy, vertiginous

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to become dizzy

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to get dizzy

title: داخ


text:
羊毛出在羊身上

Proverb

 * 1) the benefits come from oneself; there's no such thing as a free lunch

title: 羊毛出在羊身上


text:
ᡤᡠᡵᡠᠨ ᠪᠣᠣ

Etymology
Either, or a direct. Compare also the equivalent.

Noun

 * 1) the State

title: ᡤᡠᡵᡠᠨ ᠪᠣᠣ


text:
User talk:Linshee/Archive1

Categories
When creating categories, and the same category exists for other languages, please use a template such as to fill it with content. Don't place categories in it manually. —Rua (mew) 21:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. Didn't know that. Gormflaith (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Kalasha
Hello! If I may ask, where are you getting the Kalasha IPA from? —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 02:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi! I copied it from French wiki, which I assume is from the source listed there. Should the IPA be withheld until a more reliable source is found? –Gormflaith (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

FWOTD
Thanks for all the nominations! If you're worried about flooding the noms page, do it selectively: I only feature a language once per month, so it'll take me quite a long time before I run out of Czech entries. Most other languages, especially minority and underdocumented languages, are always welcome and I can't usually find enough of them to feature. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice! – Gormflaith (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

I like your ecolect page
The attention to detail is savage. Somewhere I've got a list of the entirety (as far as we could remember) of all the words that my sister and myself made up in our childhood. This wouldn't even give me a chance to practise IPA so I guess we won't publish that. But seeing someone else's equivalent is really fun. Equinox ◑ 21:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! We just got a dog so a lot of words from my childhood are resurfacing. I wanted to document it, so I just put it here. – Gormflaith (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Remember to use the code gsw for Alemmanic German entries. DTLHS (talk) 04:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * My bad. Thanks for pointing it out. – Gormflaith (talk) 04:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I changed the entry baum and a few others from cim to gsw. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I saw you corrected my embarrassing misspelling of Alemannic as well. I corrected the rest. I'm being more careful now! If you see a mistake over a bunch of entries, please let me know and I'll take care of it. I don't want others to have to clean up my silly mistakes. – Gormflaith (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

twig
I saw you mention twig in the ety scriptorium. I have a weird fascination with numbers, so I was hoping you could give me a thought or two, on the off chance that it plays a role for Bill.

So, gamma is supposed to be from giml, a kind of stick, and the small gamma looks kind of like a twig, similar to the letter y. Incidentally, gamma is the second consonant in the alphabet. Further, german "zwei" was once written "cwei", and the letter c is derived from gamma.

On the other hand, "Zweig" and "twig" have retained a resemblance to "zwei" and "two". Indeed, "*dwigʰa" is derived from "*dwóh₁".

By the way, the resemblence between gamma and ypsilon seems to be no coincidence. At least, in my local German dialect a voiced velar fricative is used for g, and could be written y. Apparently Ɣ reflects the same manner.

So, I am a little confused that twig (understand) is not related to twig (branch) and try to consolidate the two, which is rather hopeless, but I'm always skeptic about etymologies. The explanation at tuig is mostly red and the one at dobeir is hard to follow. Ultimately, the reasons to go on, which I see, are that "do" should be really hard to analyze on account of its shortness and the productivity of its different possible meanings on the one hand -- at least "towards", "two" and "do" -- and on the other, the apparent discontinuity between "do beir" ("to give") and "tuic" ("to understand"). A loose link between "two" and "give" is ger. "abzweigen" -- literally "to branch-off", colloquially "to take a part", "to channel, fork off"; Cf. versus.

There is not even a translation for irish at two or twig (yet; Maybe once I feel comfortable editing). I did look for a phonetically close Irish word for twig and found one for "perch" - "verb of bird INTRANSITIVE téigh ar fara" (the TOC mentions a noun, too, but I don't see it), which in turn is homophone to téigh ("to go", "warm", ...?). "To part" still means "to leave, go" in English.

So these figures of speech are not exactly unknown to the Irish (although, I didn't check for chronological correctness). I'm basically suggesting that twig and English could have had a major influence on Old Irish, but I don't know how. I hardly even understand your posts. I'm just thinking, perhaps the shift to /#w/ came from English via twig. What do you think?

If I had posted this in the scriptorium it would only be deleted and I concede that none of this is fit for inclusion. I hope you will find it at least interesting. And I hope too that it is not distracting from your coursework. Rhyminreason (talk) 01:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Bavarian
I noticed you haven't been adding gender for Bavarian nouns. Do you not have that in your resources? Also, it looks like a needs to be made — should that have gender, genitive, plural like  or gender, plural like ? Also pinging —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there weren't any genders. I found them in an appendix comparing Germanic languages in Italy at the end of a Cimbrian-language resource. Regarding the template, one similar to would probably be better because according to Bavarian and German Wikipedia, genitive is only used in fossilized phrases. – Gormflaith (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright, I made one that you can use based on the Mòcheno template, but I didn't like how that one throws a fit if you don't provide it with a plural, so I took that feature out. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

 * A couple unrelated notes: see my recent edits for how to specify gender with . Also, as regards taxonomic names, it's best only to add them when helpful (and only italicise genus or genus+species names). In many cases, dated sources will give taxonomic names that are obsolete, and thus serve only to confuse more if the English gloss is good enough. Thanks for all the new entries! —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Will do. Thanks for all the help; it's hard to keep track of all the templates and such. – Gormflaith (talk) 04:31, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries, and feel free to ask for help if you need it. Speaking of templates, is the one to use if you make a typo and need a page deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:38, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Bura
I noticed you're adding Bura entries without marking the tones. This is problematic, as it requires that somebody else will have to add them in down the line, and it may be a long time until anyone notices. Can you please add them to all your entries? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:31, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Looking more closely at the UCLA Phonetics Lab Archive, I see that for some reason they didn't bother to mark tone for the terms they used to document various phonemes. That's one of the problems you can run into when it's a language you're unfamiliar with and a resource that wasn't intended ever to be used for lexicography. It makes me think that maybe this isn't such a good idea. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I didn't even notice that Bura was tonal before you messaged me. I'm going to add to the entries that I've made tomorrow (It's almost midnight). Regarding the database, it seems a shame to not use, because there's tons of data on less documented languages on there, and it's a free internet-based CC source. But I see your point, and will refrain from rapidly dumping entries into Wiktionary from languages I know nothing about, and stick to West Germanic languages from now on. Thanks for calling me out; I definitely would've kept on blindly trusting the database. – Gormflaith (talk) 04:10, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I've studied Hausa, so I knew more or less what to expect when I saw it. Bura is pretty poorly documented, although we should be able to do an acceptable job of cleaning up those entries by using this and this, although neither would be a very suitable source for Wiktionary, considering that the former is from old missionary linguistics and lacks a lot of phonological detail, and the latter is not peer-reviewed and may have mistakes. I'll see if I can go through and do that tonight.
 * As for data on less documented languages... there's a great deal of it out there, and a great deal of work to be done here in many of them, including West Germanic ones. If you set up your email address, I can send you some PDFs you might enjoy. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Update: I've now finished fixing all the Bura entries as best I could. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:03, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for the help. And I'd love to take a look at some; I've just set up my email. – Gormflaith (talk) 16:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

 * Be very careful with StarLing! It's quite an unreliable resource, and Starostin is widely regarded as a crank. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Goodness. Thanks. I haven't used anything from it. – Gormflaith (talk) 20:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

etyl to der
Hi, I noticed you're changing a lot of etyl templates to der. By doing this, the etyl cleanup categories become depopulated even though der should only be used if a word is not borrowed nor inherited; basically, the change makes it look like the word is "derived" even though a more specific template is still necessary. Please use bor or inh (unless it is actually "derived"), or if you aren't familiar with the language just leave etyl. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 18:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright. I thought getting rid of the etyl categories was top priority, and then categorization as bor or inh would come later. I'll stick to bor and inh from now on. Thanks – Gormflaith (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It is an important thing to do, but just switching to der just sets us up for more work later. Best to get it done in one go. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 17:46, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Taíno
Gormflaith, I appreciate that you're trying to help, but please don't make changes en masse to languages you don't work in, nor are familiar with, unless you first speak to people who are on the project. Case in point with the Taíno entries, which were intentionally at Taíno, not Taino. --Victar (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay. Sorry. desctree and * to indicate reconstruction weren't working because tnq is for Taino, not Taíno, so I thought it must have been a mistake. If I may ask, why is it Taíno not Taino? – Gormflaith (talk) 13:49, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Taíno is pronounced /ta'ino/, not /tai'no/, and the í helps illustrate that.  still needs to be updated though. --Victar (talk) 14:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

When you move a page
...by default it leaves a redirect behind. We probably don't usually want those (especially if the move was to correct an error in the page title). Consider unticking the "Leave a redirect behind" box. Thanks! Equinox ◑ 14:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay thank you! I thought it was standard to leave one; I'll consider whether I should or not in the future. – Gormflaith (talk) 14:02, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , I believe you need to be an admin for the option. --Victar (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

 * D'oh. Ah well, an alternative is to put the speedy-delete tag on the unwanted page after the move. Equinox ◑ 14:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

desctree
Gormflaith, if you want to include alternatives beside desctree, what you need to do is add alter to the pages you're linking to. The alternatives will be automatically added to the descendants tree. Thanks. --Victar (talk) 01:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. Will do – Gormflaith (talk) 01:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Cheers. --Victar (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Descendants ordering
Remember that inherited terms should come before borrowed terms. For example, see. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 20:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, I thought it was just alphabetical. Thanks; I'll fix whatever isn't in that order Gormflaith (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yeah, it is alphabetical, but inherited terms take precedence. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 23:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

I keep wanting to ask
"what was your Wiktionary name before this name". but I suppose the history checks out. You are a multitalented busy bee. I wonder how long we will have you before the Unicode Foundation or somebody swoops in. Equinox ◑ 00:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

 * Thank you! Means a lot coming from you. And I plan to stay on here for a while. I still have 40 pages to wade through in that dang Alemannic book, and then after that who knows... There's so many languages I'm interested in. – Gormflaith (talk) 02:04, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

 * Wow, 2676 entries created already? I usually make like 500 a month... —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 22:46, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 * I'm not taking very many credits this semester so I have way too much free time... And a lot of them are from like a week when I rapidly made a bunch of mediocre entries from a mediocre source (see above convo about Bura), but I've since stuck to just West Germanic languages. – Gormflaith (talk) 23:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 * Your new entries look pretty great, so thanks for the edits! —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 01:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

jāgen descendants section
Did you really intend to remove the gml descendant section in ? By doing so, you triggered a module error in both the entries that transcluded it via desctree. If you did mean to remove it, feel free to revert my restoration- but first fix so it's not trying to transclude something that isn't there. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No, I definitely didn't mean to delete it. I think there was some type of edit conflict going on; I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks for restoring it! – Gormflaith (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Admin
Hey. I'm going to guess that within 2 months someone will have nominated you for adminship. I have my bets on who it's gonna be, too, but I prefer to keep that card close to my chest. --Cien pies 6 (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks... You're on 's WF list. Don't think I can be an admin before I've figured that whole mystery out. Also I have like zero knowledge of Lua, have been here for less than a year, and will be computer-less over the summer – Gormflaith (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * (It's not really mine anymore. Many others, including WF himself, have made far larger additions. FWIW, I became an admin after two years including a four month hiatus over the summer, and I only just learned Lua.) —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 22:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

 * OK, so I wasn't quite accurate with the guess. Anyway, I'll nominate you myself for adminship. It seems you figured out the "whole mystery" of WF, too. Lol. I'll start a vote for you if you like. I haven't started an admin vote in while, so it'll be fun. --Harmonicaplayer (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * We barely ever interact, and are off in different corners of Wiktionary (Romance vs. Germanic). Why do you think I'd be a good admin? And no offense but I don't think it'd be a good move get nominated by someone who's been blocked like dozens of times. – Julia ☺ ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 20:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hundreds of times, actually. I might nom you anyway. --Harmonicaplayer (talk) 20:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The computer-less-ness mentioned above starts this Wednesday, so I'll have to pass anyways. – Julia ☺ ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 23:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * You'd be surprised how many of our current admins were nominated by WF- mostly because other people didn't get around to it before he did. He does sweep up the occasional slow-moving farm animal or piece of lint along the way, but if people think someone's a good candidate, they'll take advantage of the opportunity and vote for them. There's no minimum experience requirement- if you're willing to work, able to learn things and have the right attitude, you can pick up the rest soon enough. I became an admin after a couple of months here, and I'm not unique in that respect (I was nominated by SemperBlotto, though). Chuck Entz (talk) 00:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * A couple months? Wow, I thought a year was the unofficial minimum. I'm still going to wait until after my break to be nominated by an admin who'll write a better nomination. Which might increase my chances of not getting obliterated by Symbol oppose vote.svg's. – Julia ☺ ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 01:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * No hurry. You shouldn't put yourself forward until you feel ready. When you are, there's a lot of work to be done, and we need all the help we can get. It takes a certain temperament to keep from taking it all too personally: you have to be merciless on vandals and irresponsible people, but you also have to be sensitive to those who feel like their edits are their children, and you're the one with the ax... Still, it can be satisfying. I'm not an expert at anything, but I know just enough to understand the people who are. I help them communicate with each other, and I fight vandalism as well as cleaning up boring technical problems, so they can concentrate more on the areas they know best. I feel like I'm making a difference for the better. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * You're certainly making a great difference, Chuck. You have lots of admirers around here. BTW, I found your comment about the farm animals and the lint funny - no idea which particular farm animal you're referring to, though. --Harmonicaplayer (talk) 11:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Albanian "qepë" (tosk) / "kepë" (gheg) ("onion")
You linked gheg albanian "kep" (a noun, and an alternative form of gheg "kepë") with a verb "kep"/"qep". They have total different meanings, are not realted and not connected to eachother. Please reverse. Thanks. IMIPER (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't add them, I just added the alter template. I'm a bit confused; you listed as an alternate form at . Tosk  and Gheg  are homonyms, which doesn't mean that they're connected. We link to words that don't exist on the project yet all the time. – Gormflaith (talk) 20:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

 * Could you please stop editing albanian words? You are totally confused because you don't speak albanian. Non-albanophon ppl editing albanian words: THIS is causing confusion.
 * I worte that the alternative form "kep" (ONION) is from "kepë" (ONION). Both are GHEG forms (northern dialect and also OLD-Albanian). You deleted the "(Gheg)" and now it's liked to the VERB "kep".
 * Also the f. should be next to "kepa" and NOT "kepë". Why? Bc "kepë"/"kep" are INDEFINITE FORMS (english: "onion"). "Kep[a]" is the DEFINITE form and FEMININE. IMIPER (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Gheg-Albanian kep[a] / Tosk-Albanian qep[a] = "[the] onion" (engl.), "[die] Zwiebel" (german), "ceap[a]" (romanian), [la] ceba (catalan), "[la] cebolla" (spanish), "[la] cipolla" (italian), "[a] cebola" (galician/portuguese). IMIPER (talk) 00:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

 * You're right, I don't speak Albanian. But I do know how Wiktionary works and have a good grasp of basic linguistics. I edit Albanian entries to make them conform to Wiktionary and linguistic standards. I did not delete the "Gheg". It's literally right there under "Alternative forms". And does not link to the verb, but to a Gheg entry that doesn't exist yet (feel free to add it). If you want to change how Albanian entries are formatted here, you can suggest it in the Beer parlour. And while you're at it, please read Wiktionary's Entry layout page to learn how to properly format entries. – Gormflaith (talk) 01:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, you did!! Look it up if you don't beleive me! And you did it again! May I ask how old you are? 10?
 * 1st: 》I did not delete the "Gheg".《 -
 * 2nd: I'm joining wiktionary since: 1 day. Don't worry, I'll learn it step by step. However, looking at all the messages that others left: you're not that professional tho. "Basic" isn't enough. My "albanian skillz" aren't basic. They are superb. You could just ask instead of wild restructuring without knowing the difference between Gheg kep / Tosk kep (later confessing to be confused).
 * Sorry if I was a little blunt; you are a new user and I was new not that long ago. There's a ton of stuff to get used to and it's kinda overwhelming at first (to me it was at least). But I looked through the edit histories and I honestly do not see where I deleted "Gheg". If you have proof you can show me the diff. I promise I'm not adding any content to your entries that isn't just standard formatting stuff (besides maybe the declension table at qepë). And I do know that there's a difference between the "kep"s–I said it in my very first reply to you ("Tosk 🇨🇬 and Gheg 🇨🇬 are homonyms, which doesn't mean that they're connected."). As for my "basic skills", I meant that I'm a linguistics major who just finished her freshman year of college, and has a long way to go before a PhD. Not that I have read some fun articles about how wacky language is. – Gormflaith (talk) 03:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

》===Alternative forms=== ▪* ''' (☆this is what I'm talking about. It's less confusing for ppl who don't speak albanian, imo)
 * I'm not here to "battle" ppl with PhD's and what not (anyway, congratulations).
 * I wish I could send Screenshots (it would spare me a lot back and forth). However, it was:
 * the declension table is fine, but not correct. TOSK, Nominative: qep/ë or qép/ë (singular, indefinite forms, "onion")., qepa or qépa (singular, definite forms, feminine, like english "the onion"). Plural: -ë(t). The root is "qep", respectively "qép". Actually, no albanian says "qepat" - not when they refer to onions.
 * Alright, I see what you mean. I deleted the "Gheg" because I converted the entire entry so it was in "Gheg Albanian" rather than just "Albanian"; it's implied that is Gheg because it's on a Gheg entry. Can you look through Category:Albanian declension-table templates and add the correct one to ? (also I'm 19 I don't have a PhD lol :-) though someday I wish) – Gormflaith (talk) 04:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Bambara
Thank you for your edits on Bambara words. Please note that the Bambara orthography does not: (1) use IPA ɡ but rather the ordinary g, hence ɡɔmɛ should be gɔmɛ (thanks for moving from gòmè, which is an old transcription); (2) place the "eng," ŋ, in initial position for prenasalized consonants, i.e., ng not ŋg, hence ŋɡɔnɔ should be ngɔnɔ. Bambara, like a number of African languages, incorporates selected characters in IPA into its orthography, but definitely not all. In Bambara they are: ɛ and ɔ (since it has a 7 vowel system); and ŋ (appears only before vowels) and ɲ.--A12n (talk) 22:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I made most of the ones with incorrect spellings a while ago when I wasn't very experienced or careful with this project. I'll move whatever's misspelled. And it doesn't use diacritics right? – Gormflaith (talk) 22:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The issue of diacritics to mark tones (2 only in Bambara) has several approaches, basically include them or not. In fr.wiktionary.org, Bambara tones are not marked, which follows some dictionaries (including at least one published in Mali for use by teachers & others working with the language, and the Lexique bambara-français-anglais online) and most popular usage in print. I've followed that practice in editing there, and would recommend it here. In the prestige dictionaries & some others, one or both tones are marked. However, the practice does not seem to be standardized, with some opting just to mark only low tones (so unmarked are high), some vice versa, and some marking both. In fr.wiktionary.org, I've put tone markings where available in pronunciation. My thought (tho this has not been discussed or settled on as a policy) is to continue not to mark tones of the headwords, but to mark them in pronunciation (so one headword might have different tones for different entries), and to leave for later the possibility for adding tone-marked "variant spellings." The latter might facilitate marking equivalences with the N'Ko transcription, in which tone marking is integral (there is not yet any significant number of N'Ko entries in en.wiktionary.org or fr.wiktionary.org). The bm.wiktionary.org was zotzed some time ago, unfortunately.--A12n (talk) 23:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * This makes sense if it's not completely standardized. I think we should follow a system at least on here though... from what little I know about Bambara I think tones in the headword, not the title and have optional diacritics like Latin, Luganda, Russian etc. Like

entry_name = { from = GRAVE, ACUTE}, to  = {}}
 * But those who are more experienced in African languages should make the decision :-) – Gormflaith (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I believe has worked with Bambara and may have something to say about this. My own opinion is that treating it like macrons in Latin might be a good idea, especially if there are words that are spelled the same but the tone is different. I would also say that having competing systems of marking tones where unmarked syllables signify the exact opposite in one system as opposed to the other is a good argument for requiring both to be marked. That way we don't have to guess which system contributors are using, and we'll also know when they're not following our system.  Chuck Entz (talk) 01:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I haven't ever studied Bambara, but thanks for the ping anyway, because I am very interested in working with editors to improve our coverage of African languages. I strongly support marking tones on the headword line (not the page title) and stripping diacritics as Gormflaith suggests, and this solution has worked really well for a wide range of African languages from multiple families. As A12n notes, there is an extra advantage here, in that we can automate N'Ko transcriptions in the future. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thx. One could also treat the tone-present & tone-absent versions as spelling variants. That's how it seems to me as a non-native speaker & observer. IOW, the Wiktionary shows what is used (what one will encounter in text) and variants. Tones are sometimes added in otherwise tone-absent text where a word could be misread and change the meaning. I find it of interest that the effort on fr.wikipedia.org, which involved Malians, decided not to mark tones (though I don't know the reasoning), and that printed text in the language typically doesn't have tone markings (but as mentioned, also see the advantage of adding toned variants to the entries). In any event, some input from experts on Bambara should be elicited. For some other tonal African languages, notably Yoruba, tone marking appears to be standard, and you commonly see it in texts. Should this discussion be moved?--A12n (talk) 19:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thinking of them as spelling variants is fine conceptually, but would make lexicography far more difficult. The work at fr.wiktionary was not really conceived with learners in mind as far as I can tell, and there are major problems in how they handle many African languages there. We can and should do better. Yoruba is a good example of a language where tones are marked in the page title, but as we aim to have page titles match actual usage, that is obviously untenable for Bambara, hence my support of marking them in the headword just like Hausa, Kanuri, and most Bantu languages. As for moving this discussion, that's at Gormflaith's discretion. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You guys can move this to the Beer parlour or wherever if you'd like. I don't really have anything to contribute to the discussion any more, and I think input from others on this issue would be beneficial. – Gormflaith (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Thx. Will follow the lead if someone else moves the discussion (not as familiar with the choices & protocols - e.g., whether this discussion is copied over to the new location for ease in reference). So if I understand, one could have page title one way - tone unmarked - and headword(s) the same or another (or both?) - tone un/marked? Am looking at how Arabic entries are handled (diacritics serving totally different functions there of course, but titles are generally without vowel marks). Noting Yoruba & Lingala for instance have tone marks in titles, which seems to make sense; and that Hausa does not, which also makes sense (there not being a standard system for tone marking in its Boko orthography). N'Ko correspondence of Bambara terms (which by implication would also be a consideration for other Manding varieties) was mentioned; Ajami for a number of languages including Manding & Hausa might also be a consideration.--A12n (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Quick additional note with apologies to User talk:Julia for staying on this space. Wanted to mention (1) a monolingual Bambara dictionary without tone marks at all (Kassim Koné, 1995, Bamabankan Daɲegafe, Mother Tongue Editions, 233 pp.); and (2) I'll try to dig out official documentation wrt Bambara orthography (was recently dealing with a question re Fula in Mali, and there should be more than one ref. available). Can move this whenever, or else I'll copy to a user page under A12n.--A12n (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Bold reference head
Hey Gormflaith, could I ask that you please not use bold in head of reference templates? If that was the desired format, it would be hardcoded in. Thanks. --Victar (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you're talking about, JohnC5 did that before I even made an account :-/ Gormflaith (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks for clarifying. --Victar (talk) 22:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

dog
i wanna have the dog. do you sometimes grab his little tail and he goes YIPP!!! like a soldier betrayed, but then looks around and "oh it's just you". then you get into this whole situation Equinox ◑ 03:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * How did you even find that video? And not on purpose, lol. He's a bit whiny though. And a troublemaker; he likes to run to the neighbors' yard to play in their bushes :) – Julia (talk) • formerly Gormflaith • 03:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

 * Equinox ◑ 05:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * 😍😍 what a cutie – Julia (talk) • formerly Gormflaith • 05:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

 * lol, tried sending you a 3 MB file. I have a suspicion I'm already shadow-banned on YouTube so let me know if nothing turns up in 24 hours. Equinox ◑ 03:50, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

"schon" and "erst"
Good morning, there! :D I anonymously edited those entries, in the latest hour before creating the present account. I saw you were the last editor so I wanted to ask you if they seem fine now. I guess I should have posted elsewhere, but whatever. ^^ Plus I wonder whether schon's 4. english translations, apart of "admittedly", match the meaning. Couldn't something like "I guess" be added? Thank you. ^^ Fairieberries (talk) 10:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * (FYI, the best place to discuss certain words is the Tea room) Hello! Your edits are fine, but I did change them a bit just to match a couple conventions (like using q). Also: regarding, I do think "I guess" is a good translation in some contexts, but generally the glosses should be the same part of speech :) If you have any more questions the Information desk is a good place to ask. Welcome to Wiktionary! – Julia (talk) • formerly Gormflaith • 15:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Doggy in the (car) window
Hiya, I see this great photo is your own work, but you must have downloaded onto Commons first. How easy is that to do? I already have a photo gallery on my user page, but I would like to add my own. DonnanZ (talk) 17:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's super easy. Just have the .jpg file on your computer, go to Commons and click "Upload file" on the left, and it'll walk you through. :-) Julia (talk) • formerly Gormflaith • 17:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, OK. I will have to sort out an image or two and pluck up the courage. And take a few more photos I want to include. Anyway, thanks a lot. DonnanZ (talk) 18:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem! – Julia (talk) • formerly Gormflaith • 18:10, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

 * I think I'm catching on, done one, you can see it at . This is a whole new ball game. DonnanZ (talk) 12:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

müessen
Just noticed this…is that 1911 dictionary really still viable? I am just surprised that the -n really reappears in this infinitive when it clearly doesn't in general use in Urnerdeutsch, as even I can hear (there are also enough examples around online, like the verbs listed in this paper). It's also not a form given in the Schweizerisches Idiotikon. But in any case, I think Alemannic verbs should always be lemmatised under the -e form since that's how 99% of the dialects use them. Ƿidsiþ 05:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

IMHO the spellings in the texts are the more correct forms, especially if labelled, but properly typing them would be difficult. -80.133.107.140 01:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The pronunciations given (which aren't in IPA) do not have /n/ at the end. The author spoke Zürichdeutsch himself, which definitely doesn't have the /n/ either. This book has valuable information for vocabulary, pronunciation, and etymology, but the orthography is a bit sketchy. Apparently the author was trying to make the spellings as close to "common Alemannic" as possible, whatever that means. I can move them all today. – Julia ☺ ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 12:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting, so he spells it with a "silent" N! It's kind of like what the Idiotikon does, although they use a superscript letter to show that it's a "historical" thing that isn't pronounced. But nowadays when people write Swiss German, they always just write infinitive endings as -e or -ä (depending on the local dialect form). Ƿidsiþ 16:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The author has two spellings: An Urseren form in the text, and a changed form in the Wörterverzeichnis. Wiktionary entries created from the source, use a spelling based on the Wörterverzeichnis although (sometimes) pages of the regular text and not of the Wörterverzeichnis are given as source (cp. ). In case of this word, the Wörterverzeichnis (p. 112) has "müessen 88", the regular text p. 85 (inside paragraph 88) has "mıæs(s)ə müssen" with some inflected forms and p. 88 (inside of examples) has "[... hed ..] mıæssən [...]" with translation "mußte" (cp. ). I don't know, if all the inflected forms could be typed correctly as the author uses an altered u (similar as to ɔ being an altered o; the left side of the u-like character is normal, but on the right side, the arm is shortend).
 * I think as with other entries, it will ultimately come back to evidence of actual usage from texts – which, in the case of Swiss German, are unfortunately few in number, especially for a specific local dialect. Ƿidsiþ 06:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

prut
I saw that you have this term in your FWOTD holding pen, but it has already been nominated in focus weeks. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  12:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I didn't see that. — Julia ☺ ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 16:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your admin vote
Hi. Please accept here: Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-08/User:Julia_for_admin. Equinox ◑ 21:17, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. — Julia ☺ ☆ • formerly Gormflaith • 22:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

whey
Thank you so much for sorting the etymology format here; but am glad that it is not in my power to remove all the P.I.E. absurd analogies. 'Whey' is far more likely to be from the same root as "Wye" river, in connection with 'water'. Kind Regards. Andrew H. Gray 12:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Andrew

 * Yep. Just adding some templates. I don't know about a connection between whey, Wye and water. I don't think they are though, because I'm pretty sure «wh» and «w» words don't usually come from the same root in PIE, because they descend from different sounds (k$w$ vs w). — Julia ☺ ☆ 18:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

 * Thank you for your message. Sorry, I may have caused confusion: "Wye" and "water" are certainly not connected; but may have had an equivalent meaning, where pre-historic forms are exceedingly dubious as origins.  I believe that the dubiousness of a Celtic origin is around the square of that from early Anglo-Saxon; and any pre-Celtic origin dubiousness is to the power of four compared with that of Old English.  What you state is true as to the distinctions between "wh" and "w", I believe; but too many etymologists assume that every Old English lexeme has a P.I.E. root.  Even those handful of Celtic origin would have come through with different sound changes where, for instance, the "g" usually became "c", not to be confused with many words akin to Celtic, but of Germanic origin, with Germanic cognates, where the equivalent of Celtic "c" or "k" is found as "h" in Germanic.  So, any words like cob, bad, toad, {oat, mote, pig, the roots of which may have been borrowed into Brittonic and afterwards into Old English; Andrew H. Gray 11:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Andrew talk} and "ael" (in 'annEAL'), et cetera, of pre-Celtic origin, may have gone through different sound changes again; but the dubiousness of this origin of the latter is exponentially higher than even that of the Celtic!  The main point of my edit was simply to outline that the P.I.E. root here is irrelevant, since its meaning is the opposite to that conveyed in whey.  Kind Regards.  Andrew H. Gray 17:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Andrew talk

Citations for FWOTD
Note that the meaning of "citation" for Foreign Word of the Day is specific, specified at the top of WT:FWOTDN. For instance, for well-documented languages a citation must be a durable quotation. So several of the nominations you added for the false cognate focus week were invalidly marked as cited. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  08:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, will change. — Julia ☺ ☆ 13:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

"Compare"
What's with replacing the word "cognate with" with "compare"? That's removing information. Korn [kʰũːɘ̃n] (talk) 09:25, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I just thought it sounded better and figured that it was implied that they're cognates. I think I've only done it on pages/words I've created myself. I can stop though. — Julia ☺ ☆ 15:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * 'Compare' tells me there is additional information on another page. That makes me have to look it up, leaving me wondering why the information is not on the original entry in the first place. If the other entry ALSO only says 'compare', I'm really none the wiser what I was supposed to compare about. 'Cognate' is clearcut, no wild-goose chase and can directly link to its own entry, so the reader has the choice to go to an another entry or not depending on what knowledge he lacks and desires. I've always changed 'compare' to 'cognate' whereever I find them, so we're at odds here. Korn [kʰũːɘ̃n] (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Broken links and alternative forms
Hi, the links at and  were broken after your edits, I fixed them. Also, please do not move alternative forms from the middle of the entry to the top. Both formats are allowed and I put them there for a reason. —Rua (mew) 19:49, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

 * Okay, thanks for fixing them, I didn't know they broke when in a descendants tree. But for the alternative forms, I'll keep them in the middle, but can't I use alter? — Julia ☺ ☆ 19:56, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * puts all the terms on one line, with a single list item in front. The normal format for lists is to have one list item per link. It is possible to change how lists display, so that the items appear side by side, using CSS, so there's no need to have a template that does this.
 * As for the links, the problem is that every template (or template parameter) is assumed to indicate one term. Including multiple terms in one template call has the implication that the entire thing is one single term, and bots and other programs may parse it that way, rather than as separate individual terms. If you look at the HTML source code of the page, you'll notice that the entire thing is wrapped in  tags, indicating that the whole piece of text, including the commas separating the items, belong to that language rather than English. This is something that  gets right at least, the items are entered as separate arguments, and are correctly separated in the resulting HTML. —Rua (mew) 20:05, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Lake Constance Alemannic
Have you ever considered entering entries of words from Lake Constance Alemannic?

On the side of my mother, I go all the way back to the Konstanz District of the, among other places in Europe. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 18:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

 * I haven't, but I definitely want to expand the dialects represented in Wiktionary's Alemannic German. The only Low Alemannic we have is a few dozen Alsatian entries; the vast majority is Highest Alemannic. I haven't chosen the next dialect I want to work on, so Lake Constance seems like a good enough choice if I can find good resources on it. And I think I'll be done with Urnerdeutsch in like the next month. – — Julia ☺ ☆ 00:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Error due to template
Hi, I saw you added a template version of the decendants on Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/andijaz. The descendants for Middle Dutch, however, are wrong. As they are linked from ende, they show the first row, which points to the translation for the conjunction "and" instead of the word for "duck". Can this be solved? --Ooswesthoesbes (talk) 15:01, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

 * The tree I made on was using 🇨🇬. However, another user who's knowledgeable in Old/Middle Dutch moved the entry to, presumably because of a misspelling, and fixed the spelling on  as well. They made a tree at  using dum. desctree transcluded the first descendants it found, which happened to be the "and" tree. So, the mistake at the Old Dutch entry was also seen in the Proto-Germanic entry.
 * tl;dr If an entry has multiple descendants trees, don't use desctree, just write out the descendants manually, like I did here to fix the issue. — Julia ☺ ☆ 16:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, that solves it, thank you! :) --Ooswesthoesbes (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Multiple links in a single template parameter
Hi, I noticed you doing this on pöoze. I changed it to separate templates/parameters. You should only include multiple words in the parameter that way if they are actually part of a single term. Otherwise, separate terms should always be in separate templates/parameters. —Rua (mew) 18:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 * Ok, I'll do that going forward. Julia ☺ ☆ 18:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Western Apache
Hi Julia I'm interested in western apache as I'm part apache would you help me do the ipa for ndolkah?Ndołkah (talk) 06:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, I replied to your question at the information desk if that helps! I actually don't know much about Western Apache, as I explained over there, so I can't say what the IPA is for sure unfortunately. Julia ☺ ☆ 17:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

We're deprecating this parameter on existing templates, so please don't add it to any new ones. —Rua (mew) 11:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks Julia ☺ ☆ 12:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

porcom et al.
I'd prefer if you'd undo the changes you're making to these entries' definition lines. It produces a request for a term that we will probably never be able to fill, which is not what requests are for, and it makes a perfectly fine entry look ugly. For very poorly attested languages, we simply define and specify the inflected form we have in the corpus, and don't try to lemmatise elsewhere when that is impossible. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay Julia ☺ ☆ 19:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ Julia ☺ ☆ 19:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Rhine Franconian at Proto-Germanic
Concerning this change to a Proto-Germanic entry, what kind of Rhine Franconian did you mean? --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 12:43, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

 * I actually have no idea why I did that. I’ll fix it. Julia ☺ ☆ 14:49, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Carrollton
What was the rationale for removing some of the places from the entry without going through RfV or RfD? DCDuring (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

 * I'm trying to fix some place-name categories and I think I just forgot about them because I'm working on "city", "town" and "village" right now. I'll go back and add them and make sure I haven't done it on other entries. Julia ☺ ☆ 01:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Does that meean that you delete content for boroughs, townships, counties, parishes, neighborhoods, SMSAs or other census-designated places? If so, the process needs to accommodate these and any others that we may have. After all, if someone took the trouble to add them, we owe their efforts some measure of respect. I don't think that content contributors believe that our formatting, templating, and categorizing justify content removal for any appreciable amount of time. DCDuring (talk) 04:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No, I'm just adding templates to existing entries, without deleting non-city/town/villages. What I meant was that I'm trying to convert e.g. "Towns of X" categories to "Towns of X, USA" to be consistent with other categories. I plan on adding stuff to Module:place/data in order to accommodate other place names and automatically categorize more countries later. What happened with Carrolton was I deleted the content, went to, opened up a bunch of tabs, and then entered the place-names by city first, then town, then village, and then other. I think I just forgot to enter the CDPs. Now I'm just organizing the places mostly by population. Anyways, I'm trying to make our geography entries more navigable with the categories and will go back to all of the entries I edited and double check to make sure everything's there. Julia ☺  ☆ 16:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm touchy about out-of-process content removal, even when accidental. Happy editing. DCDuring (talk) 16:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:Linshee/Archive1


text:
ఉత్కంఠ

Noun

 * 1) Great eagerness.

title: ఉత్కంఠ


text:
دائخ

Etymology
of, from.

Adjective

 * 1) dizzy, giddy, vertiginous

title: دائخ


text:
εγκύπτω

Etymology
From. Morphologically, from.

Pronunciation

 * Old
 * Old
 * Old

Verb

 * 1)  to examine and study carefully, look into

title: εγκύπτω


text:
တိုးတက်ရေး

Etymology
+.

Noun

 * 1) development

title: တိုးတက်ရေး


text:
ενέκυψα

Verb

 * 1)  I examined carefully, looked into

title: ενέκυψα


text:
អភិ

Etymology
From,.

Prefix

 * 1)  against, at, out, over, beyond, above, extreme, high, very

title: អភិ


text:
strzyża

Noun

 * 1) sheepshearing
 * 2) freshly-shorn wool
 * 3) sheepshearing period

title: strzyża


text: Category:hy:Neurotransmitters

title: Category:hy:Neurotransmitters


text: Category:hy:Biomolecules

title: Category:hy:Biomolecules


text: strzygę

title: strzygę


text: strzygą

title: strzygą


text: strzyże

title: strzyże


text: strzyżę

title: strzyżę


text:
strzyż

Etymology 1
,, from ,.

Noun

 * 1) any wren of the genus

title: strzyż


text:
角食

Noun

 * 1)  a loaf of bread which is square

title: 角食


text: stꞌën

title: stꞌën


text:
Swanny

Etymology
Names + -y.

Proper noun

 * 1) A nickname of the surnames Swan and Swann.

title: Swanny


text:
Pricey

Proper noun

 * 1) A nickname of the surname Price.

title: Pricey


text:
Browny

Proper noun

 * 1) A nickname of the surname Brown.

title: Browny


text:
estrupo

Etymology
Alternative form of.

Noun

 * 1)  loud noise caused by too many people walking disorderly
 * 2)  ruckus, turmoil
 * 1)  ruckus, turmoil

Usage notes
Not to be confused with.

title: estrupo


text: loodan

title: loodan


text: loodad

title: loodad


text: loodab

title: loodab


text: loodame

title: loodame


text: loodate

title: loodate


text: loodavad

title: loodavad


text:
Hodgey

Proper noun

 * 1) A nickname of the surname Hodge.

title: Hodgey


text: runią

title: runią


text:
沒有不透風的牆

Proverb

 * 1)  no secret can be kept forever

title: 沒有不透風的牆


text: 没有不透风的墙

title: 没有不透风的墙


text: 好事不出门，坏事传千里

title: 好事不出门，坏事传千里


text: runami

title: runami


text: runach

title: runach


text:
好事不出門，壞事傳千里

Proverb

 * 1) good news goes on crutches, but bad news travels fast

title: 好事不出門，壞事傳千里


text: runy

title: runy


text: 甘加

title: 甘加


text: Niemcom

title: Niemcom


text: Niemcami

title: Niemcami


text: Niemczech

title: Niemczech


text: Niemcach

title: Niemcach


text: Niemców

title: Niemców


text: Niemca

title: Niemca


text: Niemcowi

title: Niemcowi


text: Niemcem

title: Niemcem


text: Niemcu

title: Niemcu


text: Niemcze

title: Niemcze


text: Category:Central Kurdish terms borrowed from Old Armenian


text: Category:Laki terms borrowed from Arabic


text: Category:Laki borrowed terms

title: Category:Laki borrowed terms


text:
hop-forward

Adjective

 * 1) Of a beer, having hop characters most prominent in the flavour profile.

title: hop-forward


text: 千里达及多巴哥

title: 千里达及多巴哥


text: Category:sh:Fats and oils

title: Category:sh:Fats and oils


text: Category:mk:Fats and oils

title: Category:mk:Fats and oils


text: 纽阿连

title: 纽阿连


text:
千里達及多巴哥

Proper noun

 * 1)  Trinidad and Tobago

title: 千里達及多巴哥


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/2019-06/Language code into reference template names

Language code into reference template names
Voting on: Renaming reference templates including those used for further reading to contain language code in their name, as long as the language code can be meaningfully determined. Thus, for instance, renaming R:Webster 1913 to R:en:Webster 1913, R:OneLook to R:en:OneLook, R:DRAE to R:es:DRAE, R:TLFi to R:fr:TLFi, and R:Duden to R:de:Duden, with the caveat that the part of the new name after the second colon does not need to be the same as the original name if desired.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 00:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Dan Polansky (talk) 07:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour/2016/March
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] '''Template talk:R:itc:EDL, 2018

 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2019-06/Language code into reference template names

has taken it upon himself to this vote as if it was to put into effect a policy to ban the moving of any and all reference templates to names with language codes. It is not. This vote has been worded as a vote to systematically move all reference template those with language codes. If a ban was his intention of this vote, then a follow-up vote should be started explicitly stating that intent. -- 08:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That is a misrepresentation; there is no ban but there is also the principle that status quo ante prevails unless overriden by consensus. A discussion is at User talk:Victar. This discussion does not belong to the top of this vote, and I do not know why Victar is posting here; I am not sure I should be responding here either. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Again, this vote does not state that no templates currently formatted without a language code will be forbidden from being moved due to "status quo", or any reason whatsoever. As such, I will continue to move whatever templates I feel best suit the templates I work with, regardless of this vote, and will recommend others do the same. -- 18:11, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above editor should stop skipping WT:RFM, a process that covers template moves; this is a concern that existed before this vote was created. When the above editor moves a template without RFM and consensus, other editors may naturally move the template back; the status quo ante prevails barring consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:11, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree that RFM applies to each and every renaming. DCDuring (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That's absolute nonsense. Show me the rule that says all moves require a WT:RFM. -- 20:06, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * We live by our prevailing practices. If you like rules, try Wikipedia. DCDuring (talk) 20:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * "Prevailing practices" are unenforceable. If you wish to enforce something, I recommend you start a vote -- 20:15, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This is an obstructionist position. Harankas (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Which one? Yours? Victars? Mine? Something earlier? DCDuring (talk) 17:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Obviously the one that says you are entitled to have it your way unless there is a vote stating you're not. Harankas (talk) 18:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing is obvious online. Obviously I don't see my position as "my way". I see it as the Wiktionary way. DCDuring (talk) 19:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Fine, let me spell it out (I see that reading between the lines is not your strong suit): the position of the user Victar is obstructionist. Harankas (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  Fay Freak (talk) 19:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 21:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  —Mahāgaja · talk 06:52, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 4)  --  00:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Nearly a third of all reference templates are not sorted into any language categories. This is obviously due to people being too lazy to add . If we mandate a   format, when applicable, with the use of documentation and/or a bot, we could automatically add a reference templates category to those are are missing them. That's a really practical, and not pointless, reason to start mandating them.  --  21:19, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * That's far from good enough a reason to start introducing this visual overhead into template names. The time spent putting the language code into the template names would be better spent putting the same templates into the proper language categories. We do the same with mainspace entries: they are put to categories rather than being put into a nested naming structure, like moving train into en/noun/train or even en/transportation/noun/train. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to that opinion, but it does not make it fact. Do I need to quote you again from below on how editors choose to spend their time is irrelevant to a vote? I'm looking at this from a future perspective, not a present one. People will continue in their human nature of being lazy -- this, I believe, can help offset that. -- 14:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure, and people's being lazy in categorizing mainspace entries could be offset by introducing en/transportation/noun/train. And people's being lazy in adding further reading to entries could be offset by deleting all entries that have neither attesting quotations nor further reading. I don't think this kind of bondage-and-discipline approach befits the spirit of the wiki. My general position is that people have every right to be lazy and work on the aspects of this wiki that they find interesting as long as it does not harm the project; providing further reading to monolingual sources everywhere would be much more useful than putting some templates into categories, and yet, I do not wish to impose that kind of duty on editors. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Any mechanism that offsets laziness and brings greater utility to the project, I will vote for hands down, every time. If that doesn't suit you, who am I to argue. -- 15:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Erutuon, has already gone ahead and created a great little module for categorizing reference templates based on the lang code in their URL, T:refcat. Now we just need to get it added to the header to automate it completely. -- 16:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  –– Jberkel 11:44, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * @Jberkel: I did not ask the other supporters but could I perhaps ask you which rationale for the proposal do you find convincing? --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I like self-explanatory names. For example, if is mentioned somewhere, and I don't work on language xyz, I can safely ignore it, and don't have to go to the the template page to figure out what language it is for. It's also consistent with the practice of prefixing templates/modules with language codes (,  etc.). And lastly, with 4000+ languages ambiguities will become more and more frequent as the project grows (this also affects  where translated works need to be taken into account,,  etc). – Jberkel 13:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Let me note that it-IPA and fr-IPA is not really analogous since there the language code is indispensable unless we want to provide the language via a parameter, like it or rather it since IPA does take language code already but does not automatically produce pronunciation. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  --Vahag (talk) 18:13, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  --Daniel Carrero (talk) 01:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 08:37, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) . This seems a bit excessive. The only case I can think of where it may be handy is R:Dokpro, where lang=nb and lang=nn can be added. DonnanZ (talk) 12:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  The current simplicity of most template names has worked well. I have seen two arguments in favor of the change: 1) Use the language code prefix for disambiguation, that is, make sure that templates for different languages can have the same name. As for that, name overlap is going to be rather rare, and can be addressed by various means, including using an alternative acronym or by adding a year to the template name. 2) The prefix makes it easier to find the template by typing R: plus the language code into the search bar. As for that, if you remember the beginning of the template name ("R:Web", "R:Dud"), you do not need a language prefix and you can type the beginning of the template name into the search bar and the search bar will show you possible templates ("R:Webster 1913", "R:Duden"). As for the case where you only remember the language, redirects can be created to help memory, like a redirect from R:de:Duden to R:Duden; furthermore, there are template categories by language, e.g. Category:German reference templates. As a final note, the template names without language codes look a little less like letter salad and more human, are shorter to type, and present no serious practical obstacles. They are more simple; let's make everything as simple as possible but not more simple. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Especially for templates I don't use so often, sometimes I can't remember even the beginning of the template name. Then it's just easier to type  (or whatever) into the search box and see what pops up. That to me is simpler than going to CAT:Irish reference templates, since doing so requires me to open a new a tab in my browser. —Mahāgaja · talk 13:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , nice pro tip! -- 02:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure, and this search box function would be provided by creating a redirect, e.g. from Template:R:ga:Dinneen 1904 to Template:R:Dinneen 1904, right? You can verify that this works with template:R:BTS, which was moved out of process to template:R:ru:BTS and the redirect is still there. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, but this vote isn't about moving templates that already have language codes in them to versions without the code. —Mahāgaja · talk 09:02, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, it isn't, but what's the point? Let me try again: Let us suppose you cannot remember the German reference template names. One way to help you (in reference to search box) is to move R:Duden to R:de:Duden, and that is the proposal of the vote. Another way to help you is to create a redirect from R:de:Duden to R:Duden without moving the template. This alternative shows that we do not need to move the template to help you, and therefore, I oppose the proposal since I do not like its bad consequences and its good consequences can be achieved by creating redirects. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * By the way, the template redirect from T: enables you to enter "T:R:Du" into the search box and find Duden; you do not need to type Template:. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Let me make a note about economy. One argument made is that the prefix in the template name helps automatic categorization of the template. However, the categorization of a template is something you make once per template, while entering the template name into the mainspace is something you make thousand times, and you read the template name even more times; surely it is the entering into the mainspace that should be optimized. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  I tend to feel that language codes should be omitted where they don't add information to an entry or facilitate things like category sorting. Simplicity is usually best, in my opinion. Cnilep (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  If I already know to use the reference template, I think I'd probably know the language it's for by that point. Including the code seems pointless to me and seems like clutter. PseudoSkull (talk) 00:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  I don't think it makes sense to go and rename a bunch of templates to include language codes in their name when there are very few reference templates where this would make any sense. Such efforts would be better spent making Wiktionary easier to use for non-technically-minded people. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 19:43, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The time it would take to get a project done is never a valid reason not to vote for something and the productivity of one project does not take away from the productivity of another. To quote Dan, "[editors] should feel to dispose of [their time] as they see fit; we should not act as managers of other people's resources." -- 21:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * At the same time this still means introducing an extra level of difficulty in using templates, and I oppose doing this; I think it is moving in the exact opposite direction as making the site easier to use for non-technical people. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, a) if you're too technically inept to add a language code to the URL, then I have bad news for them in creating the actual reference template, because that's the easiest part of it, and b) see my rational in my vote in this being a mechanism to actually help people that are doing a poor job of creating templates, i.e. the inept/lazy. -- 21:48, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually I voted pro because it will be easier when one does not have to remember whether a template one wants to use uses the language prefix or not. Hard to remember that it is  and not . Fay Freak (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * That is an argument in both directions: if some people did not start using the language code prefixes, everything would have been consistent and no one would need to remember which of the two inconsistent practices to use. Historically, it was the people who started to use the language code who introduced inconsistence into the reference template naming. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * That is not an argument in both directions. It insinuates to complete what some people have begun so it becomes consistent instead of keeping it inconsistent. You are voting for inconsistency and incomprehensibility. Fay Freak (talk) 19:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I mostly started using the format because we began simplifying some templates to their acronyms. Three letters and a language code is easier to remember than the spelling of an author's name and the year of publication, i.e. R:De Vaan 2008 > R:itc:EDL. -- 05:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The space of three-letter acronyms is large enough (17 576 items); we don't need language code to disambiguate them. For the few cases where disambiguation will be required, switching to a four-letter acronym or another ad hoc disambiguation means can be used.
 * And the above claim about what is easier to remember is empirically unsubstantiated and does not appear particularly obvious to me. For instance, R:Duden is super easy to remember. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Did I say anything about overlap? I was merely stating what the catalyst for this change was in my case. My rationale for supporting the migration of references templates to this format is listed in my support vote. -- 14:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Without an implied overlap argument, the statement "I mostly started using the format because we began simplifying some templates to their acronyms" makes no sense. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * There are many reasons I could have given, like it being the defacto standard for creating new templates, but I gave none, and I'm not obliged to. You make assumptions of me. -- 15:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As said, the statement makes no sense without the overlap concern, and the above response makes me no wiser as to what else could make sense of the statement. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Dan, I'm not here to make sense or justify my personal catalyst in this issue. All I wanted to say in that regard is in my upvote comment. -- 15:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  14:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Clarification: I understand this oppose vote to mean opposition to mandatory inclusion of language codes, not support for banning any renaming to a name with a language code. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  08:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Indeed, this vote cannot ban renames. That said, renames are governed by the consensus principle via WT:RFM process, especially renames that are likely to be controversial. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  - I don't see any advantage SemperBlotto (talk) 08:49, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * . -- 08:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) . I don't feel for having to type in an extra "az:", or, G-d forbid, "trk-oat:" Ketiga123 (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * 2) . Reasons: (1) It is shown that redirect is good solution. (2) More convenient for old editors. (3) I like short templates names. --Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 12:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  Each and every template renaming should go through RFM. Redirects from the old names should remain if new names with language codes are created. DCDuring (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Abstain

 * : no strong feelings either way. — SGconlaw (talk) 13:05, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * : Sitting on the fence, at least for now. Nice idea in terms of orderliness of the reference library, as it were, but the case doesn't seem so strong. Main advantage I see is being able to tell the language which an R template serves. Otoh, not clear any advantage for references w/ multiple language targets. The potential advantage for automatic categorization seems offset by the amount of work needed to add the language codes - would it be any more work to just manually categorize R templates per relevant language(s) that are not so already? --A12n (talk) 12:58, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm mostly looking towards the future for the automatic categorization feature, and adding  is easier than adding categorization manually. --  16:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The initial amount of work needed to perform the template renaming is pretty manageable, I think, and if the proposal were in the other direction, i.e. removing the lang codes, I would volunteer. I think it is about what you want to see and type into the wikitext, whether e.g. R:de:Duden or R:Duden. I prefer the latter, and if I find a reference template used in a section ==German==, I don't think I need any hints as to the language; and if I find the template alone, the manual categorization will do the trick. The alleged advantage of automatic categorization seems bogus to me: it is only automatic after you have manually placed the language code into the template name. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * :Xbypass (talk) 15:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Decision

 * Fails 8-10-3. - TheDaveRoss  17:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)


text: 千里达和多巴哥

title: 千里达和多巴哥


text:
千里達和多巴哥

Proper noun

 * 1)  Trinidad and Tobago

title: 千里達和多巴哥


text: Category:ar:Swords

title: Category:ar:Swords