text:
青麻

Noun

 * 1) velvetleaf
 * 2)  ramie

title: 青麻


text:
schedulee

Noun

 * 1) One who has been scheduled.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: schedulee


text: schedulees

title: schedulees


text: scheduleds

title: scheduleds


text:
юрэнхылэгшэ

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) president

title: юрэнхылэгшэ


text:
Thurea

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Pleiades

title: Thurea


text: tùsīzǐ

title: tùsīzǐ


text:
Kilimia

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Pleiades

title: Kilimia


text: xíngxíngduì

title: xíngxíngduì


text:
ukamili

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) completeness

title: ukamili


text: 仮初め

title: 仮初め


text: Thesaurus:朝廷

title: Thesaurus:朝廷


text: Thesaurus:皇帝

title: Thesaurus:皇帝


text: miǎodǒng

title: miǎodǒng


text: yímínjiān

title: yímínjiān


text: mùhēi

title: mùhēi


text:
ਸੁਨੇਹਾ

Pronunciation

 * : sunèā

Noun

 * 1) message
 * 2) * ,, translation by Dr. Sant Singh Khalsa, ang 1166:
 * "pa"

- ਬਾਦਿਸਾਹ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਸੁਨੇਹੁ

title: ਸੁਨੇਹਾ


text: qióng'ǎicuó

title: qióng'ǎicuó


text: gāofùshuài

title: gāofùshuài


text: xiàopēn

title: xiàopēn


text: fànr

title: fànr


text: jīngshén chūguǐ

title: jīngshén chūguǐ


text: chúnxiǎng

title: chúnxiǎng


text: lǜcháliǎn

title: lǜcháliǎn


text: wǎngyuēchē

title: wǎngyuēchē


text: tiǎnpíng

title: tiǎnpíng


text: méngméngda

title: méngméngda


text: zìhāi

title: zìhāi


text: nǎobǔ

title: nǎobǔ


text: nǎocán

title: nǎocán


text: tuōdān

title: tuōdān


text: xīcháoxiǎn

title: xīcháoxiǎn


text: xièyāo

title: xièyāo


text: Zhàoguó

title: Zhàoguó


text: Zhàojiārén

title: Zhàojiārén


text: guìquān

title: guìquān


text: háiyǒu zhèzhǒng cāozuò

title: háiyǒu zhèzhǒng cāozuò


text: háiyǒu zhèizhǒng cāozuò

title: háiyǒu zhèizhǒng cāozuò


text:
mythopoeist

Noun

 * 1) A myth-maker.

title: mythopoeist


text:
糋豆乾

Noun

 * 1)  deep-fried tofu

title: 糋豆乾


text: mythopoeists

title: mythopoeists


text: 糋豆干

title: 糋豆干


text: 逗B

title: 逗B


text:
豆乾糋

Noun

 * 1)  deep-fried tofu

title: 豆乾糋


text: 豆干糋

title: 豆干糋


text: dòubī

title: dòubī


text: dòubǐ

title: dòubǐ


text: yóuxìxìng

title: yóuxìxìng


text:
fish louse

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Any aquatic crustacean which is a parasite of fish, typically attached to the skin or gills
 * 2) Certain members of class.
 * 3)  (family )

title: fish louse


text: fish lice

title: fish lice


text: jiǔtuō

title: jiǔtuō


text:
fish scrap

Noun

 * 1) Fish, or their skins, from which oil or glue has been extracted.

title: fish scrap


text: fàntuō

title: fàntuō


text: fish scraps

title: fish scraps


text:
糋雞

Noun

 * 1)  fried chicken

title: 糋雞


text: 糋鸡

title: 糋鸡


text: tǎngqiāng

title: tǎngqiāng


text:
fish-fag

Noun

 * 1)  A woman who sells fish.

title: fish-fag


text: fish-fags

title: fish-fags


text:
abarnizar

Verb

 * 1) to varnish

title: abarnizar


text: gāngtiě zhínán

title: gāngtiě zhínán


text: hēirén wènhào liǎn

title: hēirén wènhào liǎn


text: hēichángzhí

title: hēichángzhí


text:
性命根

Noun

 * 1)  lifeblood; the thing that one cherishes the most in life

title: 性命根


text:
Talk:particle

Missing grammar sense: morpheme?
Chambers 1908 has a grammar sense not covered by our existing entry: "a word that can only be used in composition, as wise in sidewise". Is that correct? Sounds more like a morpheme. Equinox ◑ 03:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

 * Among other old dictionaries, neither Johnson nor Ogilvie nor Century has it, but The Encyclopaedic Dictionary does: "a word which is not varied by inflection, as a preposition, a conjunction; a word which cannot be used except in composition, as -ward, -ly." And I found some citations (Citations:particle) of "particle" being used to refer to those strings. But a general sense of particle (our sense 3?) also seems to cover them, so it's hard to know if the narrow definition is valid or not. - -sche (discuss) 04:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * ...because e.g. Alan Strode Campbell Ross, The Essentials of English Grammar (1964), page 18, says "[...] thus smoothly is composed of the word smooth and the particle LY ", but the very next sentence is "sometimes the difference of form is very great; thus AM and BE are forms of the particle IS ", suggesting that it is using a broad catch-all sense of "particle", which also seems to be the case with the Wiseman citation I found. Hrmph. - -sche (discuss) 06:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:particle


text: yǎngfù

title: yǎngfù


text: yǎngmǔ

title: yǎngmǔ


text: Mädchen, die flöten, und Hühnern, die krähen, soll man beizeiten die Hälse umdrehen


text: yeugua

title: yeugua


text: DYJHIW

title: DYJHIW


text:
hielmo

Etymology
, borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  helmet

title: hielmo


text: Sēi Luó

title: Sēi Luó


text: Category:zh:Singing

title: Category:zh:Singing


text:
Mädchen, die pfeifen, und Hühnern, die krähen, soll man beizeiten die Hälse umdrehen

Etymology
lit. 'girls that whistle and hens that crow, need their necks wrung in good time'.

Proverb

 * 1)  a whistling girl and a crowing hen always come to some bad end;


text: sēi-wèi

title: sēi-wèi


text:
anchor ring

Noun

 * 1)  A torus.

title: anchor ring


text:
だから何だ

Interjection

 * 1) so what

title: だから何だ


text: anchor rings

title: anchor rings


text:
skromniś

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) a man or boy who is very modest

title: skromniś


text:
skromnisia

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) a woman or girl who is very modest

title: skromnisia


text: Category:Polish terms suffixed with -isia


text:
Talk:哇

"your link describes sense 4 'sentence-final particle', which is indeed a particle, while sense 1 'wow!' is clearly an interjection, no?"I get the impression that the “interjection” definition here actually uses a sentence‐final particle that just so happens to look like an interjection since there is nothing else in the sentence. (For the three remaining parts of speech listed (at a different location) at http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cbdic/gsweb.cgi?o=dcbdic&searchid=W00000011334, no interjection sense is described.)

The Wiktionary article at 好哇 describes the term as an “interjection” even though the source I cited (http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cbdic/gsweb.cgi?o=dcbdic&searchid=W00000011351) clearly describes it as a particle, so I’m fairly confident that the link I cited refers to the same sense.

That means that the fourth Wiktionary definition (which I didn’t notice) is actually redundant and should be merged.

I’m not going to revert your revert in this case, but I think it should be reconsidered. Patrick Dark (talk) 04:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

 * Hm, I think that is different from .   doesn't seem to be the same as.
 * As for dict.revised.moe.edu.tw, it is entirely possible that was overlooked.
 * As for, the whole unit is an interjection, composed of + , no?
 * —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 04:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:哇


text: vakstuuki

title: vakstuuki


text:
geaunt

Etymology
Borrowed from, , from , accusative singular of , from.

Noun

 * 1) A giant mythological or fantasy creature
 * 2) A giant person of great height
 * 3)  An immoral or despicable person.

title: geaunt


text: geauntes

title: geauntes


text:
pseudoscopy

Noun

 * 1)  Reversed perception of depth.

title: pseudoscopy


text:
barzal

Noun

 * 1) bramble

title: barzal


text: gyaunt

title: gyaunt


text: jyaunt

title: jyaunt


text: pseudoscules

title: pseudoscules


text: jeaunt

title: jeaunt


text: jeawnt

title: jeawnt


text:
franxe

Noun

 * 1) ditch, trench

title: franxe


text:
cold without

Noun

 * 1)  Brandy with cold water and no sugar.

title: cold without


text: jǐnlǐ

title: jǐnlǐ


text: quèrèn piānwù

title: quèrèn piānwù


text: piānwù

title: piānwù


text: quèrèn guò yǎnshén

title: quèrèn guò yǎnshén


text: thursse

title: thursse


text: thyrce

title: thyrce


text:
thurs

Etymology
From, from , from. Forms with -u- are partly a native development of OE -y-, but are also due to influence from 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) A demon; a creature of evil.
 * 2)  A beast; a monstrous creature.

title: thurs


text: thirs

title: thirs


text: thrisse

title: thrisse


text: thrusse

title: thrusse


text:
Citations:particle

used to refer to affixes (but also other things)

 * 1764, Charles Wiseman, A Complete English Grammar on a New Plan:
 * page 135: Sometimes two Substantives come together, without the particle of, in the nature of a Compound, as, the chamber door, the garret window, [...]
 * page 280: The Adverbs of Order are not taken from the Numerals, one, two, three, &c. but from the Ordinal Numbers, first, second, third, &c. which last have the Particle ly, joined to them only up to the number 12, or twelfthly, but thirteenthly making too many syllables, sounds very harsh, and therefore it were better to express it by circumlocution, [...]
 * page 345: we usually set such Verb or Sentence after the other Verb, and put the Particle it before it, as, it is an evil thing to lie, i.e. to lie is an evil thing.

 * 1839, The Oberlin Evangelist (1839), page 47:
 * We have the particle ward in a few passages, as "to you ward;" "to God ward;" where the word toward is split into two parts.

 * 1849, John Stoddart, William Hazlitt, Philosophy of Language: Comprehending Universal Grammar:
 * page 234: The particle ly is an abbreviation of the adjective like; and the words wisely, gratefully, judiciously, &c., were originally the compound adjectives wiselike, gratefullike, judiciouslike, &c.
 * pages 278-279: [...] even the appellations "noun" and "verb," which are on all hands admitted to be applicable to the most necessary parts of speech, are differently understood by grammarians of note. It is not surprising, therefore, that the term Particle should be misapplied, as I think it is, when intended to signify those words which are at the same time recognized as accessorial parts of speech. To say, "there are eight parts of speech, but four of them are particles," is much like saying, there are [...] eight commissioned officers, but four of them are non-commissioned. The word particle, according to all analogies of derivation, ought to mean something less than the word part, a subdivision of a division, a part of a part [...]. These secondary parts I call particles, when so used in composition. Thus, I say that, in the word Johnson, son is a particle; in the word friendship, ship is a particle; in the word delightful, ful is a particle; and in the word learned, ed is a particle.

 * 1981, Roger M. Keesing, Cultural Anthropology: A Contemporary Perspective, page 299:
 * The morphological particle "-ful" on the end of "wonderful" or "awful" need not imply that there is a substance or entity one is "full" of (to say that something is "wonderful" doesn't mean it is full of "wonder";[...])

title: Citations:particle


text: táigàng

title: táigàng


text:
Termagaunt

Etymology
Borrowed from (most early forms reflect the original consonantism in -v-), from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Termagant

title: Termagaunt


text:
槓精

Etymology
From and.

Noun

 * 1)  person who argues for the sake of arguing; contrarian; opinionated or self-righteous person

title: 槓精


text: tirmagaunt

title: tirmagaunt


text: 杠精

title: 杠精


text: gàngjīng

title: gàngjīng


text:
puparial

Adjective

 * 1) Having or relating to a puparium.

title: puparial


text: termagaunt

title: termagaunt


text: Tervagaunt

title: Tervagaunt


text: tervagaunt

title: tervagaunt


text:
pupoid

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling a pupa.

title: pupoid


text: Tervagant

title: Tervagant


text:
pupiform

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling a pupa.

title: pupiform


text: twilighting

title: twilighting


text: twilighted

title: twilighted


text:
Talk:twilit

Why two etymology sections? We don't do that at, for instance. Equinox ◑ 05:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Because Doremítzwr... maybe motivated by the different alt forms and part of speech in . I think we can merge 'em. - -sche (discuss) 06:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:twilit


text:
kongresmanka

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) congresswoman

Related terms

 * See

Etymology
From.

title: kongresmanka


text:
rinkebysvenska

Etymology
, a suburb of Stockholm, +

Noun

 * 1) Rinkeby Swedish, a sociolect and/or ethnolect of Swedish common among immigrants around Stockholm

title: rinkebysvenska


text:
それなら

Etymology
, literally "if that".

Conjunction

 * 1) if that's the case, in that case

title: それなら


text: Template:R:DBLA

title: Template:R:DBLA


text:
trójnik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tee

title: trójnik


text:
それならば

Etymology
, literally "if that".

title: それならば


text:
ばらまく

Verb

 * 1) to scatter, to spread, to disseminate, to distribute, to strew

title: ばらまく


text:
zucrería

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) pastry shop

title: zucrería


text: zrujano

title: zrujano


text:
वक़्फ़ा

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) pause, halt, stop
 * 2) delay
 * 3) interval, gap
 * 4) respite, interlude, intermission
 * 1) respite, interlude, intermission
 * 1) respite, interlude, intermission

title: वक़्फ़ा


text:
zirgüello

Etymology
Ultimately.

Noun

 * 1) plum fruit

title: zirgüello


text: mompreneurship

title: mompreneurship


text:
mumpreneurship

Noun

 * 1) The condition of being a mumpreneur.

title: mumpreneurship


text:
zirgüellera

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) plum tree

title: zirgüellera


text:
dadpreneur

Etymology
, modelled on earlier /.

Noun

 * 1)  A father who works as a business entrepreneur in addition to his family commitments.

title: dadpreneur


text: dadpreneurs

title: dadpreneurs


text:
ziresa

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cherry

title: ziresa


text:
sprzęg

Noun

 * 1)  coupling

title: sprzęg


text:
ziresera

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cherry tree

title: ziresera


text:
zirco

Noun

 * 1) circus

title: zirco


text: zimenterio

title: zimenterio


text:
ziego

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) blind

Noun

 * 1) a blind person

title: ziego


text:
zicala

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) cicada

title: zicala


text:
sprzączka

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) buckle

title: sprzączka


text:
zibada

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  barley
 * 1)  barley

title: zibada


text: omanko

title: omanko


text:
Talk:carnal

Verb
There is an extremely rare verb, meaning "to have sex with" (i.e. carnal knowledge):

 * Sir Thomas Browne: "this was the temper of that lecher that carnaled with a statue"
 * 1933, Senate Journal of the Legislature of the State of Washington (page 49): "Sentenced March 4, 1927, from Jefferson county to a term of from five to fifteen years in the State Penitentiary for the crime of carnalling and abusing female child."

Chambers 1908 also lists the word as a verb, but defines it as "convert into flesh; become fleshy"; I can't find that in use.

Equinox ◑ 06:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:carnal


text: explosive gelatine

title: explosive gelatine


text:
explosive gelatin

Noun

 * 1) A powerful explosive made by gently heating nitroglycerin in a water-bath, then dissolving guncotton in it.

title: explosive gelatin


text:
生養

Verb

 * 1) to give birth; to procreate
 * 2) * Proverbs 30:16; English translation from the King James Version
 * "dng"

- җысы нэгә дун-я, бу нын сын-ён вавади дўзы, ба фи хәбугуди димян зэмусы хуәян, та йүнзун бу фә: „Гули!“

 * 1) to raise
 * 2)  to be born

title: 生養


text:
purfly

Adjective

 * 1)  wrinkled

Synonyms

 * ,, ; see also Thesaurus:wrinkled

title: purfly


text:
przetwornik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  transducer

title: przetwornik


text:
Thargelia

Proper noun

 * 1)  One of the chief Athenian festivals in honour of the Delian Apollo and Artemis, held on their birthdays, the 6th and 7th of the month Thargelion (about May 24 and 25).

title: Thargelia


text:
sciagrapher

Noun

 * 1) One who studies how to draw shadows accurately.
 * 2) A radiographer.
 * 3) A maker of sundials.

title: sciagrapher


text: sciagraphers

title: sciagraphers


text:
use and wont

Noun

 * 1)  Customary practice.

title: use and wont


text:
przepływ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) flow
 * 2) flow
 * 3)  flow

title: przepływ


text: 生养

title: 生养


text:
consolatorily

Adverb

 * 1) In a consolatory manner.
 * 2) * 2004,, Christina, Queen of Sweden, London: Fourth Estate, Part 1, “The Little Queen,” pp.39-40,
 * Of the younger Oxenstierna brother, Gabriel Gustavsson, now High Steward, she writes that he was well liked and well spoken, but in the natural way of the Swedes, without the burden of much erudition, since he had “only a smattering of Latin.” But he was, she adds consolatorily, “a very good man.”
 * Of the younger Oxenstierna brother, Gabriel Gustavsson, now High Steward, she writes that he was well liked and well spoken, but in the natural way of the Swedes, without the burden of much erudition, since he had “only a smattering of Latin.” But he was, she adds consolatorily, “a very good man.”

title: consolatorily


text: valvated

title: valvated


text:
cross-battery

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  The use of information from multiple batteries of tests in order to guide diagnostic decisions and to gain a fuller picture of an individual.
 * 2)  A pair of batteries commanding the same spot from different directions.

title: cross-battery


text: cross-batteries

title: cross-batteries


text:
扇面琴

Noun

 * 1) yangqin; Chinese dulcimer

title: 扇面琴


text: clotured

title: clotured


text: cloturing

title: cloturing


text: ancress

title: ancress


text: ankress

title: ankress


text: ancresses

title: ancresses


text: ankresses

title: ankresses


text:
carboxamidate

Noun

 * 1)  A salt or complex of a carboxamide

Verb

 * 1)  To react with a carboxamide

title: carboxamidate


text: carboxamidates

title: carboxamidates


text: carboxamidated

title: carboxamidated


text:
生腸

Noun

 * 1)  animal oviduct
 * 2)  caecum
 * 3)  bird oviduct

title: 生腸


text: 生肠

title: 生肠


text: carinogenesis

title: carinogenesis


text: cellopentose

title: cellopentose


text:
cephaloprothorax

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The fused head and prothorax of spiders and crustaceans

title: cephaloprothorax


text:
Galeazzo

Etymology
From.

title: Galeazzo


text:
napływ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) inflow, influx

title: napływ


text:
chelative

Adjective

 * 1)  Relating to, or producing chelation

title: chelative


text:
cholestenoic

Adjective

 * 1)  Derived from a cholestene

Derived terms

 * cholestenoic acid

title: cholestenoic


text:
ciguatoxic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to ciguatoxins

Related terms

 * ciguatoxicity

title: ciguatoxic


text:
Talk:anbury

More about the turnip disease
Chambers 1908 says: "It is often confounded with finger-and-toe (dactylorhiza), which is rather a degeneration of the plant than a disease, the bulb branching out into a number of taproots, while the skin remains unbroken. Anbury causes a scabbed and broken skin, and tubercular growths on the roots and at the base of the bulb." Equinox ◑ 07:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:anbury


text:
circumabdominal

Adjective

 * 1) Surrounding the abdomen (typically, of an insect)

title: circumabdominal


text:
clonogenically

Adverb

 * 1) In a clonogenic manner

title: clonogenically


text:
Эмеса

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1) Emesa

title: Эмеса


text:
coherentization

Noun

 * 1)  conversion to a coherent form

title: coherentization


text: softscaping

title: softscaping


text: softscaped

title: softscaped


text: coherentizations

title: coherentizations


text:
coimmunize

Verb

 * 1) To immunize against two diseases

Related terms

 * coimmunization

title: coimmunize


text:
coimmunization

Noun

 * 1) immunization against two diseases

Related terms

 * coimmunize

title: coimmunization


text: coimmunizing

title: coimmunizing


text: coimmunized

title: coimmunized


text:
Middle States

Proper noun

 * 1) New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware.

title: Middle States


text: coimmunizations

title: coimmunizations


text:
coimmunolocalization

Noun

 * 1)  The simultaneous immunolocalization of two species

title: coimmunolocalization


text: collagenisation

title: collagenisation


text:
comodulator

Noun

 * 1) Anything that comodulates

title: comodulator


text: comodulators

title: comodulators


text: congenical

title: congenical


title: 419er


title: 419ers


text:
pfa

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to die

title: pfa


text:
counterinduction

Noun

 * 1)  The opposite process to induction (creation of a specific example of a general principle)

title: counterinduction


text:
生空

Verb

 * 1)  to stir up trouble; to make trouble

title: 生空


text:
生空生縫

Verb

 * 1)  to stir up trouble; to make trouble

title: 生空生縫


text: 生空生缝

title: 生空生缝


text:
生空生榫

Verb

 * 1)  to stir up trouble; to make trouble

title: 生空生榫


text:
roving reel

Noun

 * 1) A device for measuring a hank of yarn.

title: roving reel


text: roving reels

title: roving reels


text:
poppis

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1)  popular

Usage notes
Uninflected.

title: poppis


text:
herb Peter

Noun

 * 1) The cowslip or primrose.

title: herb Peter


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2018-12/Lemming principle into CFI

Lemming principle into CFI
Voting on: Adding the following as the next-to-last paragraph of WT:CFI, and therefore, as the paragraph before the one starting with "In rare cases, a phrase that is arguably unidiomatic ...":

An attested term that appears to be a sum of its parts yet is included in at least two professionally published general monolingual dictionaries should be included. Such dictionaries include but are not restricted to Merriam-Webster, OED, AHD, Cambridge, Collins, Macmillan, Longman, German Duden and Spanish DRAE; dictionaries that do not count include WordNet.

Rationale: See vote talk page. The voters only vote on the proposed action, not on the rationale.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 00:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Dan Polansky (talk) 08:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour/2014/January
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Lemming principle into CFI

Support

 * 1) . Let's face it, many of the dictionaries used as references are predecessors of Wiktionary in printed form. DonnanZ (talk) 11:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  It is a reasonable shortcut for including terms that are useful to readers, as other dictionaries seem more eager to include fixed phrases. Some SOP terms that can be kept via the Lemming principle are drinking water, local area network and white supremacist (though some could be kept by means of other rationales, others cannot). ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  in general for attested terms. Acceptable dictionaries for specific languages to be agreed on separately. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 13:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , provided that some indicator of the SOP-ness of a term can be added, should a term be challenged in RFD. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 03:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  per rationale on the talk page. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * An example nomination: WT:RFDE: I check, and off I go building the dictionary; case closed. I can also ponder independently on usefulness of "president-elect" and I see one, but I can be spared the trouble. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  Mofvanes (talk) 18:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  We still require attestation, which is good and ensures we are documenting language as it is used. If independent groups of professional lexicographers think a term is worth explicitly defining, I'm fine with following that lead. The proposed rule allows us to rapidly close some RFD discussions, freeing up editors' time to invest in other things on the site. The application of both attestation and multiple dictionaries protects us from the risk of  copyright traps. -Stelio (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Well put. --Dan Polansky (talk)
 * 1)  Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 07:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  — Mnemosientje (t · c) 14:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 4)  פֿינצטערניש (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 5)  per Dan Polansky rationale. Richardb43 (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC) (See old persona at user:richardb)
 * 6) . Generally I'd consider it not so much an argument in itself as an argument in favour of some other grounds for inclusion, one which is obviously recognised by professional lexicographers – but as a shortcut, I would support this. Ƿidsiþ 12:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 7)  This is a good practical way to do things.  John Cross (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Oppose

 * : Other general dictionaries are bad. The less one has to use them the better. Fay Freak (talk) 01:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Re: "Other general dictionaries are bad": Untrue generalization, with zero substantiation. A substantiation would consist e.g. in giving example entries that are bad, in other dictionaries, and these would be bad sum of parts entries since attestation is not given up by the proposal. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * : Most of the English entries I've created are supported by two or more lemmings, but I still want people to feel free to RFD them if they have good reason to think we shouldn't have them. Similarly, I don't want to be shut down with a peremptory Keep per WT:LEMMING when I nominate entries for deletion. In other words, let reasoned discussions keep happening. By the way, more doesn't necessarily equal better. Per utramque cavernam 01:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Let me add that I concur with -sche. Per utramque cavernam 22:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * "More doesn't necessarily equal better". I have added a reference to . DonnanZ (talk) 12:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  Different dictionaries can have different "words" in them. That's a good thing. We should aim to describe language and not other dictionaries. I particularly object to sentiments like "for the sake of competition, we should include everything multiple professional dictionaries include". Finally I think that the list of acceptable sources is slightly nonsensical and I imagine that it will lead to many disagreements in the future about "acceptable" dictionaries. DTLHS (talk) 16:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) The aim indeed is to describe language, not dictionaries, and to indicate that an attested term, using attestation methods of en wikt, means such and such; that is not a description of other dictionaries. 2) The "for the sake of competition" rationale is not part of the main rationale presented on the vote page. It cannot possibly be that a proposal is opposed only because of opposition to one of multiple independent rationales supporters have: a theorem is proven when one correct proof is found regardless of how many incorrect proofs were submitted. 3) The list of sources is there to give an idea of a broader term "professionally published", and that it is so is reinforced by "include but are not restricted to" phrasing; I don't see how it is "nonsensical", and disagreements about the scope of "professionally published" can be there either way, and the examples merely reduce the possible disagreement. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  Equinox ◑ 20:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2) . I think lemmings can guide us in our determinations of whether or not something is NISOP or otherwise inclusion-worthy, but I don't want a rule that indiscriminately includes anything other [pairs of] ["acceptable"] dictionaries have. - -sche (discuss) 22:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 3) . This rule could allow a lot of entries that really don't need to be included. In my opinion, an entry "needs" to be included if someone might come to Wiktionary looking for its definition, and although some of the entries the lemming principle allows will meet this requirement, all of them definitely won't. We shouldn't have to include a term that no one will ever look up just because another dictionary does, and this still applies even if several other dictionaries decide to unnecessarily include that same term. Implementing this policy would make editors of professional dictionaries indirectly responsible for judgments about what belongs in Wiktionary instead of allowing Wiktionary editors to directly make those judgments. Making a policy like this feels dangerous to me because it takes some power of judgment away from us as editors. It might make RFDs quicker, but quicker doesn't necessarily mean better if it robs us of a piece of our independence. —Globins (yo) 08:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I find it likely that professionally published dictionaries include additional terms because people keep on looking them up; Wiktionary editors keep on proposing for deletion useful entries that people keep on looking up, from my experience. The notion that lemming-included entries will include those that "no one will ever look up" seems rather unlikely, and in any case, unsubstantiated: not a single example has been provided. And even if the lemming criterion would lead to inclusion of some terms that are not looked up, that is compensated by additional inclusion of terms that people do keep on looking up, and would not find in Wiktionary otherwise. Put differently, adding meat and protein is good even if it means adding a little amount of fat and carbs as well (the analogy is not so good since we do need fat and carbs, as well as dietary fiber). --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:56, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree that it's better to have unnecessary entries than to not have necessary entries, but my point is that we shouldn't trust other dictionaries to make decisions for us about which entries are the necessary ones; we should be the ones making those decisions independent of what other dictionaries are doing. —Globins (yo) 09:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * That's a matter of cost benefit analysis. This proposal is a partial outsourcing proposal (attestation is not given up), and also a proposal to include more, never to include less because of lemmings. It is not an utter and complete delegation of inclusion criteria to other dictionaries. An alternative is to keep on developing all criteria in house. As a wiki lexicographer, I am doing my best to stubbornly try to think clearly and look at and search for evidence, but I do not have the time to devote to figuring out criteria and their repercussions, and I would much prefer to have more of my energy spared for expanding the dictionary rather than having to discuss and show evidence in RFD when useful entries are being threatened with deletion, sometime by students who have not seen a paying customer in their lives, and have no sense of economy of effort and delivery of results. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  --  06:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 23:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  — Julia ☺  ☆ 18:17, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 4)  with a heavy heart. This does not accomplish much because of the "multiple respectable" dictionaries restriction. As unintended consequences often flow from the application of legalistic argument to novel wording, The small benefit does not seem to me worth the risk. DCDuring (talk) 12:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * : Could you clarify? The wording used is "at least two professionally published", not "multiple respectable". The wording is a result of Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Lemming principle into CFI. Without such a requirement or similar, amateur monolingual dictionaries would count as well. And what is the "risk" you are talking about? What makes you think "at least two professionally published" significantly reduces the benefit? --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't. I just see it as having insufficient benefit. It will not help in adding terms from the worlds of work and crafts, where we are notably deficient, because the glossaries that contain such terms are not "respectable" and too few in number in the numerous special areas involved. I view any additional wording added to our rules, coupled eith a decided tendency toward legalistic argumentation, as providing too much opportunity for unintended consequences. DCDuring (talk) 12:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The proposal says "professionally published", not "respectable". Do you have a particular glossary in mind that is not "professionally published" and yet worthwhile? --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * In your Beer parlour proposal years ago, you wrote: "In the interest of speeding up RfDs for English terms and senses [...]". Does the proposal fail to achieve the speeding up that you intended? Also, you wrote: "If it can't be enacted into something virtually automatic, it wouldn't do the job I was looking to have it do." If a proposal is automatic, it has to contain something that prevents inclusion of unreliable amateur works, doesn't it? --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. So, on mature reflection, having seen how marginal most new English entries are, and recognizing that our ability to have this principle operate automatically at the definition level will not be very good, and for the reasons stated above, I oppose this. DCDuring (talk) 13:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The rate of speeding up RFD does not seem to depend on new entries but rather on those that end up in WT:RFDE. And in WT:RFDE, my experience is that there is plenty of use of WT:LEMMING. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) —The lemming test is a useful diagnostic, but it shouldn't give an automatic pass. If several dictionaries list a multi-word phrase as an entry, Wiktionarians should be able to articulate why and use that argument to keep the phrase, rather than simply pointing to those dictionaries and calling it sufficient. —Mahāgaja · talk 10:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  – We don’t know which criteria the editors of some professionally published dictionaries use to include some (in my eyes occasionally obviously Ni) SoP entries; we should not be bound by them and be free to apply our own judgement to the question of idiomaticity.  --Lambiam 23:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * : Inclusion in other dictionaries may be taken into account, but ultimately we should make our own decisions about what to include in Wiktionary. Mihia (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  — Ungoliant (falai) 11:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  per Mahāgaja. — Droigheann (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  I'd like a way for us to include SOP terms, but I wouldn't want them being first-class citizens and I loathe rulings that reduce our autonomy. Crom daba (talk) 23:12, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  good arguments on both sides, can't decide. – Jberkel 12:42, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Question
If the vote fails, what will happen of ? Per utramque cavernam 21:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think this should change the results of past RFDs. If the word passed, then I don't see a reason for it to be deleted, especially considering that the lemming principle has never been an official policy. —Globins (yo) 02:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm talking specifically about the "Lemming test" section on the page I linked to, not so much about the entries that have been kept thereby. Should it be kept there, or should it be removed entirely? Per utramque cavernam 13:36, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It can stay until there's a discussion (and consensus) that's about deleting it. Most of the other tests on that page aren't backed by CFI either; the point of the page is "to rationalize how and why some terms are idiomatic when others are not". Several of the people opposing making this a rigid policy explicitly think it's fine as an advisory guideline, and the page does say "tests can be used as guides during RFD, but they are not hard/fast rules". - -sche (discuss) 19:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Understood. Per utramque cavernam 22:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Decision

 * 14–16–1: Vote fails no consensus. Per utramque cavernam 21:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * this and the other vote ended in no consensus. -- 08:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree, no consensus. DonnanZ (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Mh, ok. What's the threshold? Per utramque cavernam 14:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * When a vote loses with a super majority, that's a failure. -- 15:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * My understanding is that achieving less than 50% is a "fail". That understanding is what is proposed at Votes/2019-03/Defining a supermajority for passing votes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


text:
herb trinity

Noun

 * 1) The pansy.
 * 2) The hepatica.

title: herb trinity


text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Lemming principle into CFI

Rationale
Rationale for having such a principle: Using the principle, we can speed up the RFD discussions, freeing our mental energies for expanding the dictionary for our readers. At worst, we end up including items that are redundant; accuracy is not at stake since the term has to be attested as per the proposed wording.

As for impact of the proposal, there are two groups of terms impacted:
 * 1) Terms that we would create and keep anyway, after a RFD discussion and deliberation. For these terms, there is no difference in inclusion, but there is a difference in RFD administration cost: for these, the RFD may not be created at all where it would be created otherwise, or when RFD is created, it may get swiftly closed. Also, someone pondering to create an entry might give up on it fearing the deletion, where the lemming principle might quickly confirm that the effort is worth it to the prospective creator.
 * 2) Terms that a discussion would determine to be sum of parts, but that we would include because of the lemmings. For those on the inclusion side, this may be an added benefit. For those on the deletion side, this is may be a disadvantage.

Rationale for having the principle in CFI: Having the text in CFI is most convenient for a newbie looking for criteria for inclusion, and this is a criterion for inclusion. Furthermore, the lemming principle is arguably not necessarily a test of idiomaticity, and therefore, its presence in Idioms that survived RFD is not ideal.

Why is WordNet excluded: WordNet is as respectable as any dictionary, but its purpose is to create a semantic network and aid automated reasoning and understanding of text. Therefore, WordNet is liable to include all too many sum-of-part entries by design.

--Dan Polansky (talk) 09:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Expanded. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

"At least one" is not enough IMO
No individual dictionary deserves that much trust enshrined in policy! Equinox ◑ 09:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * "At least two independent"? --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Made it "at least two"; I left "independent" out since that would make it too long, and is kind of implied. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree. I create entries without hesitation when I find them in three dictionaries (say Macmillan, Cambridge, Longman); a recent example would be . I'm slightly more hesitant with only two, but I generally find it acceptable. However, with just one, I'm instantly wondering "why is this not covered by other dictionaries? Is it an oversight on their part, or is it simply not really an idiom? Is it SOP?" in particular seems prone to include SOP terms that I don't want to see here. Per utramque cavernam 10:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

How to gauge dictionary quality?
We would want to exclude things like spammy clickbait dictionary sites based on copying other sources etc., and focus on professional respectable ones — I assume. Equinox ◑ 09:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Good point. "at least one respectable general monolingual dictionary, e.g"? --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Added "respectable". --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Would "professionally edited" be better? Or "notable", a term used by Wikipedia? --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I often find, (which is not the same as the OED) and  to be of good help too. Especially the first of the three. Per utramque cavernam
 * I added Longman and Cambridge; note, however, that the list was not intended to be exhaustive as indicated by the use of "e.g.". I now made it even more explicit by the use of "include but are not restricted to". --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

 * "Respectable" seems to open another can of worms: respected by whom? I think I would prefer something along the lines of "professionally published". Basically I would include works created by academically qualified people and sold for money, probably not other works. Equinox ◑ 12:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I have now used "professionally published". I tend to agree that "respectable" was less than ideal. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

I don’t trust any dictionary, and I don’t trust native speakers or those who strive to be native speakers by focussing on a count of languages lesser than five. They include many set phrases that are sum of parts, because of their unbalanced view on their language. Hence the double-entendre of the word “sophistication”. And the business of lexicographers is not respectable but dirty. This new motion also tries to weaken once again Wiktionary’s character as secondary source, and again privileges English and other imperalist languages that teem with dictionaries. Fay Freak (talk) 12:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This is only about an override of the sum of parts requirement; attestation is still required regardless of what other dictionaries do. True enough, if this passes, the result will be more beneficial for English since it has more dictionaries, but it can benefit many other languages as well. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This is not different from what I said. I understood that this is only about an override of the sum of parts requirement. But I doubt that it gives a competitive advantage to look into other dictionaries to override. It perhaps would cause too much influence: Working with other dictionaries in mind, like also assuming idiomaticity and defining it so because other dictionaries assumed it idiomatic. Basically this vote creates a fiction of idiomaticity. Though it be intended procedurally it can easily effect like an irrebuttable presumption. Fay Freak (talk) 13:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The vote rationale states speeding up RFD as a benefit, not competitive advantage. Further, one of the above posts suggests that monolingual native speakers are more likely to see terms in their native tongue as more than sum of parts, whereas from my experience, they tend to see SOPness where non-natives see idiomaticity or other kind of inclusion-worthiness. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If neither dictionaries nor speakers define what a language is, what does? The imperialists? - TheDaveRoss  13:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Nobody does. The suffices, and the whole usage counts. It is to be avoided to formally give the competitors additional weight or one loses form oneself. Fay Freak (talk)
 * But speakers are who use the language. - TheDaveRoss  13:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Trivial. And editors look what of the speakers’ uses is lexical. This vote breaks this principle. It tells to look at what other editors do. A principle corrosion. Fay Freak (talk) 13:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * We should not be "gauging dictionary quality" at all. In general we have very little insight into the process other dictionaries use to decide what to include. We need to make our own criteria. I intend to oppose strongly. DTLHS (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * We can assume that, whatever the process the dictionaries use, the intent is largely to make the dictionary useful and appealing to users. And whatever the process, it is designed and administered by paid professionals. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't assume that. And people get paid to do lots of stupid things. Maybe they included a word because they in turn were using other dictionaries as sources. We have no idea. DTLHS (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Let emphasize that I would consider it unwise to include unattested words only because they are in other dictionaries. The proposal requires attestation as usual, and only lifts the requirement of idiomaticity. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

"should"?
"An attested term that is included in at least two respectable general monolingual dictionaries should be included.": I'm not sure I agree with that modal. Why not ? Per utramque cavernam 12:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * WT:CFI uses should throughout. Software specifications often use shall for binding requirements and should for mere recommendations, but that is not the custom of CFI. Can suggests to me "can but does not have to". --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

 * "Can" seems correct, then. We're not implementing a policy that says Wiktionary must add every eligible lemming. Equinox ◑ 17:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The intent is that two lemmings ensure inclusion of an attested term, without editor discretion to override the inclusion. Of course, that does not mean there is a deadline for creation or anything. Compare "A term should be included if it's likely that someone would run across it and want to know what it means." --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * How is it going to work out? Will the entries satisfying that condition be entirely protected from RFD and speedily kept if nominated? Per utramque cavernam 17:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I take the override note back. People can override CFI to the extent they feel free to override CFI. However, the added specification does not expressly provide for override. Thus, if someone votes "delete" despite two lemmings, that would be against CFI, and therefore a CFI override. Similarly, those who previously invoked WT:LEMMING so far in RFD were making a CFI override, albeit one that appeared supported by the consensus in the linked 2014 discussion.
 * Understood. Per utramque cavernam 17:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I think this discussion is getting involved, and there really isn't anything truly complicated. The proposal uses the same tense/modality as CFI's "A term should be included if it's likely that someone would run across it and want to know what it means", and that's it. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Scope
This vote lists only English dictionaries. Are we making English into a limited documentation language? Is this supposed to apply to all languages? DTLHS (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This applies to all languages, and the wording does not say otherwise. I considered mentioning Duden, but then omitted it to make the wording and choice of dictionaries simpler; the dictionary list is there to give an idea of what kind of dictionaries we are talking of. As for LDL, the proposal does not lift the requirement of attestation, merely the requirement of idiomaticity; the whole LDL business is that LDL are not required to be attested in use. But I am not sure I understand the above comment about LDL. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I added Duden and DRAE to prevent any doubt. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Possibility of replacing defs with ?
I don't think we should allow other dictionaries to override our independent determination of idiomaticity, but I agree that for the sake of competition, we should include everything multiple professional dictionaries include. I think it would be a good idea to allow RFD votes to replace a definition included in other dictionaries with if we decide that it is SOP. We could allow it to be used as a translation target and have any other information regularly included in an entry, while at the same time making it clear to users that it is simply the sum of its parts. (If we ever get to the point of including a collocations namespace or section in entries, these could be converted to collocations.) Andrew Sheedy (talk) 06:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * First, let me point out that the proposal as worded does not change Wiktionary's notion of "idiomaticity"; rather, it allows inclusion of certain attested terms even when they are not idiomatic or appear not to be. Second, I for one don't like &lit, but think it might be a good idea to include label "sum of parts" before a definition when someone feels it is a sum of parts; the definition may select only some senses from the component words, and there is utility in that selection; to rather let the reader search for the pertinent senses for themselves would be a disservice. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

"general monolingual dictionaries"
Hm, not all languages are blessed with the existence of a monolingual dictionary. (Am I being nitpicky?) —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 09:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You are right. The phrase "general monolingual dictionaries" is from Beer_parlour/2014/January. We could design a broader lemming principle that would drop the "monolingual" requirement. The thing is, the principle as proposed is automatic, with no tentativeness specified, and therefore, the specification is rather conservative. You can see how many opposes there are for the current principle; making the principle weaker, even more inclusive, would generate even more opposition, I fear. The principle is to benefit languages lucky enough to have monolingual dictionaries, and there are quite a few. If consensus arises to make the principle broader, it can be made so in another vote. We would probably want to make it broader only for languages that do not have two monolingual dictionaries in the first place. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


text:
hard metal

Noun

 * 1) A hard, white, brittle alloy of two parts of copper with one of tin, used in the production of gunmetal.

title: hard metal


text:
鉎鐵

Noun

 * 1)  cast iron

title: 鉎鐵


text: 鉎铁

title: 鉎铁


text:
Jeddart

Proper noun

 * 1)  The town of Jedburgh.

title: Jeddart


text:
Jeddart staff

Noun

 * 1) A Jedburgh staff.

title: Jeddart staff


text: Jeddart staffs

title: Jeddart staffs


text: Jeddart staves

title: Jeddart staves


text: prosodieën

title: prosodieën


text:
ἔτνος

Etymology
. It has been connected with 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) thick soup made with peas or beans

title: ἔτνος


text:
lotusvoet

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) lotus foot foot disfigured by foot binding

title: lotusvoet


text: lotusvoeten

title: lotusvoeten


text: lotusvoetje

title: lotusvoetje


text: lotusvoetjes

title: lotusvoetjes


text: lotussen

title: lotussen


text: lotusje

title: lotusje


text: lécci

title: lécci


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI

Phrasebook CFI
Voting on: Changing the phasebook criteria in WT:CFI as follows:

New: Phrasebook entries are very common expressions that are considered useful to non-native speakers. An attested English term that appears to be a sum of its parts should be included as a phrasebook entry if it is present in at least three independent professionally published phrasebooks; if an attested English phrasebook entry does not meet that, it can only be included if consensus grants an exception. For attested non-English terms, the phrasebook inclusion criteria are unspecified, but being a translation of an includable English phrasebook term is a hint. An example phrasebook entry is what is your name.

Old: Phrasebook entries are very common expressions that are considered useful to non-native speakers. Although these are included as entries in the dictionary (in the main namespace), they are not usually considered in these terms. For instance, What's your name? is clearly a summation of its parts.

Rationale: See vote talk page. The voters only vote on the proposed action, not on the rationale.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 00:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Dan Polansky (talk) 08:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Discussion:
 * Wikt rei-artur3.svg Votes/pl-2010-10/Phrasebook CFI
 * Wikt rei-artur3.svg Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI

Support

 * 1)  in general as a phrasebook contributor. For non-English phrases, we should also aim at including stock phrases used in specific languages and cultures. For example, Arabic  (used by Muslims), Japanese  (a stock phrase usually used by a senior towards subordinates), Sinhalese  (a form of greeting) should be included, even if their translation (especially literal) into English is not necessarily includable as a phrasebook entry. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 13:45, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * All your examples are already included based on our current policies; are there any entries that we want that this vote would allow but are currently excluded? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:41, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * As for entries included only because of phrasebook, I am thinking of I'm hungry and it counterparts cs:mám hlad (redlink, "I have hunger") and de:ich habe Hunger ("I have hunger), and further I'm cold, cs:je mi zima (redlink) and de:mir ist kalt (redlink). There are more examples at User talk:Dan Polansky/2013. Note that these are not currently excluded since we do currently have a phrasebook provision in WT:CFI, just that the provision does not provide any operationalized criteria. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) . Andrew Sheedy (talk) 03:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2) . — SGconlaw (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 3) . ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  13:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 4)  — Mnemosientje (t · c) 14:55, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 5)  per my rationale on the talk page. The prasebook is useful but having no easy-to-administer criteria is something of a problem. An example RFD currently ongoing: Requests for deletion/English. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 6) .Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 14:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  Wiktionary isn't a paper phrasebook. I don't think phrases should be limited to what's in paper phrasebooks and agreed to bureaucratically. Having said that, I can't offhand think of a much better set of criteria to replace the "consensus." —  [ זכריה קהת ] Zack. — 14:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Let me point out that the part "if an attested English phrasebook entry does not meet that, it can only be included if consensus grants an exception" does provide for inclusion of phrases not in other phrasebooks, albeit against the bar of 2/3 supermajority. Thus, if there is a consensus for including an extra item, it can be included. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) . I think the old text is incomprehensible though, so the proposed text would be an improvement in that respect at least.  Per utramque cavernam 18:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * @Per utramque cavernam: Would you care to provide a rationale for the oppose vote? --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * As I've said before, I'm not keen on having phrasebook entries in the mainspace (though I realise my vote doesn't really help in going in that direction).
 * I think the phrasebook entries possibly worth having are already salvageable by other means.
 * Also, I find the proposal too abstract: I don't know what items we have that we wouldn't have with the proposed criterion; conversely, I don't know what items we don't have that we would have with the proposed criterion. Per utramque cavernam 17:55, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * "I'm not keen" is not stated in term of benefits for the reader. As for "too abstract", the proposal is not abstract, but you seem to be missing example phrasebook entries, and these are I'm hungry (cs:mám hlad) and I'm cold (cs:je mi zima). --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe not, but I'm thinking of something else that seems as important: the task of a dictionary. Here's our definition of : "A reference work with a list of words from one or more languages, normally ordered alphabetically, explaining each word's meaning". We can argue endlessly on the definition of "word", but I'm pretty sure everybody agrees it does not include complete sentences. How is "how do I get to the bus station" a word?
 * All I'm saying is: we can be useful, yes, but not at the expense of forgetting our purpose here: building a dictionary; not a grammar book, not a phrase book.
 * "you seem to be missing example phrasebook entries, and these are I'm hungry (cs:mám hlad) and I'm cold (cs:je mi zima)": this isn't an answer to my query above. I've asked for concrete examples of what would be allowed with the proposed criterion that isn't currently allowed, and conversely. Per utramque cavernam 18:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm hungry is allowed by the proposed criterion and needs the phrasebook protection; as for current criterion, it is so vague that it is not very clear what it protects and what it does not protect, although it probably does protect I'm hungry as well. Because of the vagueness, I cannot answer your question; rather, I propose to replace a vague criterion with very unclear boundaries with a specific, easy-to-administer criterion. As for "word" and dictionary, that is the wrong way of looking at it; black hole is not a word, and nor are proverbs words but rather complete sentences. We have WT:CFI spelling it quite clearly. Wiktionary is not narrow-minded, or at least the English Wiktionary is not. As for "we are building a dictionary", we are not building anything narrowly conceived: we have a rhyme guide, a thesaurus (semantic network), topical categories, etc. The phrasebook makes good use of our entry format as for translations, and is a welcome addition, providing added value to the reader. The quoted definition of a dictionary is wrong anyway; there are pronunciation-only dictionaries and etymology-only dictionaries, etc.. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Be it proverbs, affixes, compound nouns, idioms, all of those are included by virtue of being non-SOP "lexical units" in some way. We can argue over what is and what is not SOP, but we're working under the assumption that for something to be included in the main space, it mustn't be SOP. Translation targets go against that notion, and that's why I disagreed with the THUB proposal. I think phrasebook sentences are an even worse type of translation-target entries, and that to start including those will further dilute the essence and purpose of the main space.
 * "we have a rhyme guide, a thesaurus (semantic network), topical categories, etc." Yes, and all of that is outside the main space. That's why I don't have a problem with it. Per utramque cavernam 19:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The point is that 'We can argue endlessly on the definition of "word", but I'm pretty sure everybody agrees it does not include complete sentences' needs to be retracted as irrelevant. There has to be a meaningful development in the discussion. Wrong arguments need to be retracted when pointed out. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't see what warrants this grating remark; I've already reworded my initial message. The term "word" may have been poorly chosen, though I thought it sufficiently vague to include all sorts of "lexical units" (including proverbs and compound nouns); what else do you want me to say? Do you disagree with something in particular in the first paragraph of my 19:25 post? Per utramque cavernam 19:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Per utramque cavernam 11:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you support the phrasebook in a separate mainspace, you need to 1) admit that it will still be part of Wiktionary database, and 2) you need to explain the benefit to the reader of the dictionary. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Here's what I was writing: If we want phrasebook type content, fine, but I'll add: "not in the main space; let's find another way". You generally object that something has to be in the mainspace for maximum utility and visibility. I disagree with your assumption. By the way, I don't ever see you voice such misgivings about the Thesaurus. I'd like to find a list of synonyms of "weird"; how am I going to know that I have to type "Thesaurus:strange" into the search bar? Well, I look around a bit, using my common sense. I find there's a link to the Thesaurus in the synonyms sections of both and, and everybody is happy. Per utramque cavernam 19:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * : I'm in two minds about this, but erring towards Oppose. The existing wording does need improving, but I think the proposed wording isn't quite right. I'm sorry that I didn't formulate and voice these opinions before the vote started, but it's taken me a while to process the implications and get my thoughts in order. -Stelio (talk) 10:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC) (re-signed with sig on same line as vote, so that it is counted correctly)
 * On the one hand, it's a phrasebook equivalent to the lemming vote: three professional publications include a phrase, so we should too. Additional phrases require consensus. Attestation is required either way.
 * On the other hand, whereas dictionary entries are (arguably) objective units of language for which I think we can take the lead of professional lexicographers, I find phrasebook entries to be far more subjective. What gets included in one phrasebook and not another varies. As does the exact wording.
 * Would you include all of these phrases if they each passed the proposed test? "Do you have a room?" / "I would like a room, please." / "Are there any rooms left?" (related but different phrases).
 * Would you include all of these phrases if they each passed the proposed test? "I want the bill." / "I would like the bill." / "The bill, please." (rephrasing a single underlying intent).
 * I feel like referring to professional publications is a useful test for whether we include a phrase, but I also feel like we should have the option to refuse to include a phrase, even if it's in three professional publications, if our consensus is to exclude it (perhaps, for example, because it practically replicates an existing phrasebook entry that we have listed).
 * I have the suspicion that there are published phrasebook entries that we as a community may feel we don't need to list at all. Perhaps an example would be phrases from old phrasebooks that are effectively obsolete? Something like, "When does the next Zeppelin depart?"
 * And there doesn't appear to be a way to disallow published snowclones under this proposal ("I am an accountant." / "I am an actuary." / "I am an architect." / "I am an astronaut." / "I am a baker." / "I am a banker." / "I am a boxer." / "I am a butcher." / "I am a candlestick maker." / "I am a cartographer." ...).
 * Lastly, I note that  has been published by professional publishers. I'm sure we would not consider such a work as a "professionally published phrasebook" for the purposes of this proposal, but there's nothing in the wording that allows for an exclusion for this or other works of similarly dubious quality (in the same way that the lemming vote allows for certain sources to be excluded).
 * -Stelio (talk) 14:03, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  Illogical extension. The proposed wording talks about “sum of parts” when it did not matter for phrases under the phrasebook project anyway. The usefulness criterion is fine. Not sure what “three independent professionally published phrasebooks” could tell us, only that is surely would be contentious. Finding that “phrasebooks” can contain everything (what is a phrase? You know how broadly it used, like in “nominal phrase”, “verbal phrase”) we would still fall-back to the usefulness criterion. So this vote only introduces discord and solves nothing. Fay Freak (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It is actually usefulness that brings about discord, as per past discussions. The proposal replaces something vague with something reasonably specific and easy to administer. There can be disagreements about which phrasebook is "professionally published", but much less so than about whether a phrase is useful for a phrasebook. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * There will be many question marks about which phrases count or what qualifies. A “phrasebook” isn’t as much a closed thing as you might imagine.
 * Plus I pose the question if looking through phrasebooks is what dictionary editors should do: Our company isn’t that large that this work wouldn’t make a difference. Instead of looking through phrasebooks you could just decide “This phrase is useful, Imma create it”: WT:BOLD. Other people wouldn’t look anyway and just create, since this is what any IP can do. Spare your own time please. Fay Freak (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * An IP can create a phrasebook entry, sure, but when the entry lands in WT:RFD, multiple editors have to spend their attention in figuring out whether to keep or delete the entry. Furthermore, an editor pondering to enter a phrase may be demotivated by lack of certainty as to whether the phrase is going to be deleted. The proposed criteria provide something like legal certainty for a core of the phrasebook, and can be effectively used in RFD, sparing editor's time. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * And you think editors rummaging phrase books would be less attention-intensive?
 * You are projecting. You would be motivated more, I assume, but if one is not motivated without such certainty it probably isn’t worth it to create the phrasebook entries in question. Phrasebook entry deletion requests have been not many, had little chances anyhow. I am concerned that the new rule would motivate you to create phrasebook entries that aren’t worth it. I mean well towards you and assess that you are more fruitful a creator without such a rule. Fay Freak (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I do take my chances at times, but I prefer to operate under legal certainty. Multiple phrasebook entries have been removed; I have no idea where "had little chances anyhow" is coming from. As for editors searching for phrasebooks, there is, which finds enough items and the case is closed real fast, with almost no cognitive effort. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  since, from the discussion I've read, a lot of this seems to be purely a reaction to the existence of phrases like "I'm genderfluid". פֿינצטערניש (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. I don't see what "a lot of this" refers to. As for "I'm genderfluid", let's see: should it be kept in the phrasebook or not, and if yes, why yes, and if not, why not? The phrase "I'm genderfluid" is just an example of something that the proposal makes easy to administer, while the current criteria are so vague as to provide very little guidance on what to do with it. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I always find it revealing which sentences just happen to be used as examples. It explains, for example, why these new CFI are so drastically different from the CFI for normal entries, which require citations in durably archived sources instead of appearances in professionally published dictionaries. Regardless, I don't think these CFI are coherent with the CFI for normal entries. Perhaps to be fair we should just leave the phrasebook stuff to Tatoeba. פֿינצטערניש (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not about attestation (WT:ATTEST): phrasebook entries still have to be attested, as per the proposal. It is about sum of parts. I'm hungry is a sum of parts; the point of the phrasebook criteria is to include it anyway. I noticed I'm genderfluid today; it is not an example driving this vote in any way. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , principally because of the word "should"; Stelio points out a range of unwanted entries that this policy would say we "should" include (even if it does not require that we do). On the whole, this is an intriguing proposal, but to cast it in political terms, we need revolution rather than reform. That might mean a wholly new namespace and format, rather than a modified guideline in the CFI. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1)  -- Mihia (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  -- Jberkel 01:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Abstain

 * for now. I would suggest distinguishing phrasebook entries from ordinary dictionary entries using "Phrasebook:". This will help in distinguishing such entries from ordinary entries that are simply non-idiomatic sum-of-parts terms. — SGconlaw (talk) 11:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Phrasebook entries are usually distinguished using a conspicuous box, e.g. in I'm hungry. Moving them to a separate namespace would make it harder for the dictionary user to look them up; it would complicate things with no or little benefit in return that I can see. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Provided phrasebook entries are properly marked, I have no objection to them. — SGconlaw (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Decision

 * 7–8–0: Vote fails no consensus. Per utramque cavernam 21:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


text:
θηριομάχος

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) fighting against wild beasts

title: θηριομάχος


text:
सोय

Etymology
From.

Numeral

 * 1) six

Etymology
,, , from.

Noun

 * 1) convenience, facility, arrangement, opportuneness

title: सोय


text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI

Rationale
Phrasebook entries can be very useful but there is a fear that useless entries defended as phrasebook ones will flood the mainspace. By requiring English phrasebook entries to be in other phrasebooks, we put limit on phrasebook entries, doing so with the help of an easy-to-verify criterion.

The lemming idea (being in other phrasebooks) is not applied to non-English entries since these may have too hard a time being found in phrasebooks, as pointed out by the opposition in Votes/pl-2010-10/Phrasebook CFI.

Why "it can only be included if consensus grants an exception": This is an express override option allowing inclusion of English terms that are not in phrasebooks. Absent lemmings, the hurdle to overcome for inclusion is consensus (usually 2/3 majority), reflecting that phrasebook is controversial per Votes/pl-2012-12/Removing phrasebook.

--Dan Polansky (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

"Summation of its parts"
Just a minor point: I think "sum" would work better. "Summation" sounds more mathematical and suggests an addition process rather than the result of adding things together. Equinox ◑ 13:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Luckily, it is in the old text, not in the proposed text. Still, valuable info. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


text:
opstoot

Etymology
From. Equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1)  uproar, riot, brawl unruly gathering of people with altercations
 * 2)  outbreak, outburst rapid development of a disease or symptoms

title: opstoot


text: opstootje

title: opstootje


text: opstootjes

title: opstootjes


text:
repletively

Adverb

 * 1) In a repletive manner.

title: repletively


text:
Steakmesser

Noun

 * 1) steak knife

title: Steakmesser


text:
emeseniano

Etymology
From.

title: emeseniano


text: Steakmessers

title: Steakmessers


text: emeseniana

title: emeseniana


text: with the skin of one's teeth

title: with the skin of one's teeth


text:
swa-

Etymology
, from, from , from , from.

Prefix

 * 1) self-, auto-

Prefix

 * you (p) _______
 * _______ you (p)
 * _______ you (p)
 * _______ you (p)

title: swa-


text:
straw stem

Noun

 * 1) The fine stem of a wine glass pulled out from the material of the bowl, instead of being attached separately.
 * 2) A wine glass having this kind of stem.

title: straw stem


text: straw stems

title: straw stems


text: gideonsbendes

title: gideonsbendes


text: gideonsbenden

title: gideonsbenden


text:
κυλλός

Etymology
Probably connected with. The word has been explained variously as a zero-grade derivation or, or o-grade , from the  root , or alternatively and perhaps more plausibly from ;  compare , , ,. In view of the problematic Indo-European etymology, the word may well be of origin.

Adjective

 * 1) clubfooted and bandy-legged
 * 2) deformed, contracted, crippled
 * 3) crooked (of things and limbs)

title: κυλλός


text:
put someone in a false position

Verb

 * 1) To bring someone into a situation where they are sure to be misunderstood by others.

title: put someone in a false position


text:
δορατοθήκη

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) spear-case

title: δορατοθήκη


text:
slaoliestijl

Etymology
Compound of. Named after a print in art nouveau by for a salad oil company. The print became a famous example of art nouveau in the Netherlands.

Noun

 * 1)  art nouveau

title: slaoliestijl


text:
pulp engine

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1)  A machine for converting rags etc. into pulp.

title: pulp engine


text: pulp engines

title: pulp engines


text:
pulmonotoxic

Adjective

 * 1) toxic to the lungs

title: pulmonotoxic


text:
slaolie

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1)  salad oil

title: slaolie


text:
よすが

Etymology
→ * →

Shift from yosuka, itself a compound of 🇰🇲. The ka shifted to voiced ga in.

Noun

 * 1) something to rely on; a connection, affinity
 * 2) someone to rely on; a relative
 * 3) an opportunity, way, means

title: よすが


text:
unrapt

Adjective

 * 1) Not rapt.

title: unrapt


text:
इंतख़ाब

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) election
 * 2) selection, choice, pick

title: इंतख़ाब


text:
σίττη

Etymology
According to Beekes, of onomatopoeic origin but Furnée links the word with.

Noun

 * 1) nuthatch

title: σίττη


text: glijboten

title: glijboten


text: glijmiddelen

title: glijmiddelen


text:
Σχοῖνος

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Schoenus, Boeotia, Greece

title: Σχοῖνος


text: Emeserin

title: Emeserin


text: Emesenerin

title: Emesenerin


text:
calçotets

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) underpants; pants (for males)

title: calçotets


text: gozertje

title: gozertje


text: gozertjes

title: gozertjes


text:
ジルバ

Etymology
Borrowed from (formal transcription ).

Noun

 * 1)  jitterbug

title: ジルバ


text: Homserin

title: Homserin


text: Homsiotes

title: Homsiotes


text: homsiotes

title: homsiotes


text:
ጨረቃ

Etymology
Borrowed from a language.

Noun

 * 1) moon

title: ጨረቃ


text:
አሸዋ

Noun

 * 1) sand

title: አሸዋ


text:
መሬት

Noun

 * 1) earth; soil; land; ground

Proper noun

 * 1) the Earth

title: መሬት


text:
ደመና

Noun

 * 1) cloud

title: ደመና


text:
አመድ

Noun

 * 1) ash

title: አመድ


text:
ነፋስ

Noun

 * 1) wind; breeze

Etymology
See.

Noun

 * 1) wind
 * 2) air, breeze

title: ነፋስ


text:
ማቃጠል

Verb

 * 1) to burn

title: ማቃጠል


text:
crenator

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  Any anionic amphipath that inserts itself into the outer layer of a lipid bilayer to form a convex curvature

title: crenator


text: crenators

title: crenators


text:
मक़रूज़

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1)  indebted, in debt

Noun

 * 1)  debtor

title: मक़रूज़


text:
ጭጋግ

Noun

 * 1) fog

title: ጭጋግ


text:
kemma

Etymology
From, , from , from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to come

Etymology
<

Noun

 * 1)  chemistry as a school subject

Verb

 * 1) to comb

title: kemma


text:
ጭስ

Noun

 * 1) smoke
 * 2) poison gas

title: ጭስ


text:
ብናኝ

Noun

 * 1) snow

title: ብናኝ


text:
ጸጉር

Noun

 * 1) hair
 * 2) fur

title: ጸጉር


text: cryoconites

title: cryoconites


text:
Enshi

Etymology
From the romanization of the.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Japanese:

title: Enshi


text:
graftombe

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) tomb, crypt; sometimes used for any large funerary monument

Usage notes
Sometimes considered pleonastic (or more rarely tautological).

title: graftombe


text: graftomben

title: graftomben


text: graftombes

title: graftombes


text:
cryodenervation

Noun

 * 1)  Denervation by the application of low temperatures.

title: cryodenervation


text: 来凤

title: 来凤


text: 來鳳

title: 來鳳


text: 宣恩

title: 宣恩


text: cryodessicator

title: cryodessicator


text: 鹤峰

title: 鹤峰


text: 鶴峰

title: 鶴峰


text:
cryodesiccator

Noun

 * 1) A device used in cryodesiccation

title: cryodesiccator


text:
emeseno

Adjective

 * 1) Emesene

Noun

 * 1) Emesene

title: emeseno


text: 建始

title: 建始


text: emesena

title: emesena


text:
cryoimmunological

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to low-temperature immunology

Related terms

 * cryoimmunology
 * cryoimmunotherapy

title: cryoimmunological


text:
cryoimmunology

Noun

 * 1)  low-temperature immunology

Related terms

 * cryoimmune
 * cryoimmunological
 * cryoimmunotherapy

title: cryoimmunology


text:
cryptodont

Etymology
en

Noun

 * 1) Any bivalve mollusc of the subclass

title: cryptodont


text: cryptodonts

title: cryptodonts


text:
cryptodontian

Noun

 * 1) Any dicynodont therapsid of the clade

title: cryptodontian


text: cryptodontians

title: cryptodontians


text: grootvorstendommen

title: grootvorstendommen


text:
cyanovirin

Noun

 * 1)  Any of a group of virucidal proteins present in some cyanobacteria

title: cyanovirin


text: cyanovirins

title: cyanovirins


text:
cytohistochemical

Adjective

 * 1) cytological and histochemical; relating to cytohistochemistry

title: cytohistochemical


text:
gifmengerij

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) the crime or act of mixing poison into foods or drinks

title: gifmengerij


text: gifmengerijen

title: gifmengerijen


text: superfractals

title: superfractals


text:
geslachtsklier

Etymology
Compound of.

title: geslachtsklier


text: geslachtsklieren

title: geslachtsklieren


text:
निवाला

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) mouthful, morsel

title: निवाला


text:
çetinë

Etymology
From a South Slavic language, ultimately from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

title: çetinë


text: portmanteaued

title: portmanteaued


text: portmanteauing

title: portmanteauing


text: grutters

title: grutters


text:
dafinë

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) laurel, bay
 * 2) laurel
 * 1) laurel

title: dafinë


text:
vuurvlinder

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) A copper, used of certain butterflies of the genus.

title: vuurvlinder


text: vuurvlinders

title: vuurvlinders


text: vuurvlindertje

title: vuurvlindertje


text: vuurvlindertjes

title: vuurvlindertjes


text: hagepreken

title: hagepreken


text:
frozen food

Noun

 * 1) Food that is frozen to preserve it, usually being purchased in a frozen state and kept in a freezer before use.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 冷凍食品, 速凍食品, 急凍食品
 * Dutch: diepvriesvoedsel, diepvrieseten
 * Finnish:
 * German:
 * Polish: mrożonki

title: frozen food


text:
opodatkować

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to tax

title: opodatkować


text: Rommany

title: Rommany


text: Rommanies

title: Rommanies


text: hansworsten

title: hansworsten


text:
crown agent

Noun

 * 1)  The principal legal adviser to the Lord Advocate on prosecution matters.

title: crown agent


text: harpoeniers

title: harpoeniers


text: crown agents

title: crown agents


text:
förknippa

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬

Verb

 * 1) to associate, to connect
 * 2) to annex
 * 1) to annex

title: förknippa


text:
prosecution association

Noun

 * 1)  An organization of citizens, typically in the same community, who paid dues to cover one another's costs of privately prosecuting offenders should a crime be committed against them.

title: prosecution association


text: prosecution associations

title: prosecution associations


text:
dezinterpretace

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) misinterpretation

title: dezinterpretace


text: Category:Czech terms prefixed with dez-

title: Category:Czech terms prefixed with dez-


text:
opodatkowywać

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to tax

title: opodatkowywać


text:
Marzipankartoffel

Noun

 * 1) A spherical marzipan sweet popularly eaten at Christmas

title: Marzipankartoffel


text: Marzipankartoffeln

title: Marzipankartoffeln


text:
dezinsekce

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) disinsection, disinsectization

Related terms

 * See

title: dezinsekce


text: hekeldichten

title: hekeldichten


text: hekeldichtje

title: hekeldichtje


text: hekeldichtjes

title: hekeldichtjes


text: hellekinderen

title: hellekinderen


text:
খা

Etymology
. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬,  /, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) consume
 * 2) accept, receive
 * 1) accept, receive
 * 1) accept, receive
 * 1) accept, receive
 * 1) accept, receive

title: খা


text: herautje

title: herautje


text: herautjes

title: herautjes


text: Rhymes:Italian/ilita

title: Rhymes:Italian/ilita


text: hemelnimfen

title: hemelnimfen


text:
clearing nut

Noun

 * 1) The seed of the tree, traditionally used for purifying muddy water.

title: clearing nut


text: clearing nuts

title: clearing nuts


text: hemelbedje

title: hemelbedje


text:
yhteistiheysfunktio

Noun

 * 1) joint probability density function

title: yhteistiheysfunktio


text:
interpretace

Noun

 * 1) interpretation

title: interpretace


text:
hallavuosi

Noun

 * 1) a cold or frosty year that leads to bad farm yield

title: hallavuosi


text:
heinävuosi

Noun

 * 1) year of hay usually used when speaking of a good or bad year in terms of production of hay

title: heinävuosi


text:
huippuvuosi

Noun

 * 1) peak year
 * 2) banner year

title: huippuvuosi


text:
julkaisemisvuosi

Noun

 * 1) release year, publication year

title: julkaisemisvuosi


text:
julkaisuvuosi

Noun

 * 1) release year, publication year

title: julkaisuvuosi


text:
kirjanpitovuosi

Noun

 * 1) bookkeeping year, accounting year

title: kirjanpitovuosi


text:
lapsuusvuosi

Noun

 * 1) childhood year

title: lapsuusvuosi


text:
lomanmääräytymisvuosi

Noun

 * 1) a year used for determining the period of annual leave

title: lomanmääräytymisvuosi


text:
marjavuosi

Noun

 * 1) year of berries usually used when speaking of a good or bad year in terms of production of berries

title: marjavuosi


text:
merkkivuosi

Noun

 * 1) anniversary, a year that marks a milestone

title: merkkivuosi


text:
missivuosi

Noun

 * 1) the year during which a woman is the titleholder of a beauty pageant

title: missivuosi


text:
nuoruusvuosi

Noun

 * 1) year of one's youth

title: nuoruusvuosi


text:
näytäntövuosi

Noun

 * 1) year of shows of a theater

title: näytäntövuosi


text:
hash run

Noun

 * 1) A sort of paperchase organised by the.

title: hash run


text:
oppivuosi

Noun

 * 1) year of study

title: oppivuosi


text:
perusvuosi

Noun

 * 1) base year

title: perusvuosi


text:
palvelusvuosi

Noun

 * 1) year of service, service year

title: palvelusvuosi


text: hash runs

title: hash runs


text:
perustamisvuosi

Noun

 * 1) establishment year, a year in which something was established

title: perustamisvuosi


text:
poikavuosi

Noun

 * 1) boyhood year

title: poikavuosi


text:
siemenvuosi

Noun

 * 1) year of seeds usually used when speaking of a good or bad year in terms of production of seeds

title: siemenvuosi


text:
sopulivuosi

Noun

 * 1) year with many lemmings

title: sopulivuosi


text:
valmistusvuosi

Noun

 * 1) manufacturing year

title: valmistusvuosi


text:
varainhoitovuosi

Noun

 * 1) financial year

title: varainhoitovuosi


text:
叩頭蟲

Noun

 * 1) click beetle; elater

title: 叩頭蟲


text: 叩头虫

title: 叩头虫


text:
磕頭蟲

Noun

 * 1) click beetle; elater
 * 2)  one who lowers their head when sleeping upright

title: 磕頭蟲


text: 磕头虫

title: 磕头虫


text:
嘀斗

Noun

 * 1)  click beetle; elater

title: 嘀斗


text: heremieten

title: heremieten


text:
afper

Etymology
Initialism of.

Noun

 * 1)  A member of the alt.fan.pratchett newsgroup, for fans of the author.

title: afper


text: kokospalmene

title: kokospalmene


text: Pratchett

title: Pratchett


text: kokospalmar

title: kokospalmar


text: kokospalmane

title: kokospalmane


text: hersenpannen

title: hersenpannen


text: hersenvliezen

title: hersenvliezen


text:
shadow stitch

Noun

 * 1) A very delicate kind of ladder stitch used in fine openwork.

title: shadow stitch


text: shadow stitches

title: shadow stitches


text:
宿投

Adjective

 * 1)  seasoned; experienced

title: 宿投


text: hoefijzers

title: hoefijzers


text: hoefijzertje

title: hoefijzertje


text: hoefijzertjes

title: hoefijzertjes


text:
deziluze

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) disillusionment, disillusion

title: deziluze


text:
inclearing

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  The total amount in cheques and bills of exchange chargeable to a bank by the clearing house.

title: inclearing


text: inclearings

title: inclearings


text:
dezintegrace

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) disintegration

title: dezintegrace


text:
疊蜷

Verb

 * 1)  to cross one's legs

title: 疊蜷


text:
疊圈

Verb

 * 1)  to cross one's legs

title: 疊圈


text: 叠圈

title: 叠圈


text: 叠蜷

title: 叠蜷


text:
snobilitare

Etymology
From it.

Verb

 * 1)  to take away nobility from; to degrade morally

title: snobilitare


text:
bucket rendering

Noun

 * 1)  The rendering of a graphical scene in a number of portions ("buckets") that can be assigned to different processors to take advantage of parallelism.

title: bucket rendering


text: homofoben

title: homofoben


text:
party spirit

Noun

 * 1) A feeling or sense of celebration or enjoyment.
 * 2)  The feeling of common purpose and togetherness experienced or shown by members or supporters of a group, especially a political party, sometimes accompanied by unreasonable animosity towards members or supporters of other groups.
 * 1)  The feeling of common purpose and togetherness experienced or shown by members or supporters of a group, especially a political party, sometimes accompanied by unreasonable animosity towards members or supporters of other groups.
 * 1)  The feeling of common purpose and togetherness experienced or shown by members or supporters of a group, especially a political party, sometimes accompanied by unreasonable animosity towards members or supporters of other groups.
 * 1)  The feeling of common purpose and togetherness experienced or shown by members or supporters of a group, especially a political party, sometimes accompanied by unreasonable animosity towards members or supporters of other groups.
 * 1)  The feeling of common purpose and togetherness experienced or shown by members or supporters of a group, especially a political party, sometimes accompanied by unreasonable animosity towards members or supporters of other groups.
 * 1)  The feeling of common purpose and togetherness experienced or shown by members or supporters of a group, especially a political party, sometimes accompanied by unreasonable animosity towards members or supporters of other groups.

Translations

 * Serbo-Croatian: svečarski duh

 * French:
 * Serbo-Croatian: partijski duh

title: party spirit


text: snobilita

title: snobilita


text:
party-spirited

Adjective

 * 1) Exhibiting party spirit.

title: party-spirited


text: hoofdkussens

title: hoofdkussens


text:
tv-paprika

Etymology
From the initialism of +. It is only by coincidence that the term shares its initials with, also abbreviated as , which is often misleading even for native speakers.

Noun

 * 1)  of larger size and a mild taste, cultivated to be stuffed

title: tv-paprika


text:
tévépaprika

Etymology
Pronounced form of, in analogy with ~.

title: tévépaprika


text: horrelvoeten

title: horrelvoeten


text:
খুৱা

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) feed, cause to consume

title: খুৱা


text:
Unol Daleithiau America

Usage notes

 * In accordance with Welsh grammar, is preceded by the definite article, whereas  can never be.

title: Unol Daleithiau America


text:
Talk:UNEDIC

I don't understand much French, but this sounds like an acronym rather than an initialism. --Pious Eterino (talk) 13:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:UNEDIC


text: hugenoten

title: hugenoten


text:
vippse

Verb

 * 1)  transfer money or pay via the mobile application Vipps

title: vippse


text:
攝手路

Verb

 * 1)  to offer a bribe

title: 攝手路


text: 摄手路

title: 摄手路


text:
懾屎跤

Noun

 * 1)  coward

title: 懾屎跤


text: 慑屎跤

title: 慑屎跤


text:
ceraunite

Etymology
Ultimately.

Noun

 * 1) A belemnite.

title: ceraunite


text: ceraunites

title: ceraunites


text:
calcarenitic

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to calcarenite.
 * a calcarenitic limestone

title: calcarenitic


text:
belemnitic

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to belemnite.
 * a belemnitic limestone

title: belemnitic


text:
Schumpeter's gale

Etymology
From 's .

Proper noun

 * 1)  The principle of creative destruction; the obsolescence of existing products due to the introduction of new products.

title: Schumpeter's gale


text:
懾屎

Verb

 * 1)  to be afraid; to be scared; to be frightened

title: 懾屎


text: 慑屎

title: 慑屎


text:
ijsthee

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1)  iced tea, ice tea
 * 2) * 1852, J. J. A. Goeverneur, Landen, steden, volken en menschen. Een panorama in negentien groepen, vol. 1, J. B. Wolters (publ.) page 62.
 * "nl"

- Zij koelen al hunne dranken gaarne in ijs af, zijn verzot op de velerlei ijstoebereidingen, die het gansche jaar door langs de straten hunner steden worden uitgevent, en drinken niet alleen ijswater, ijswijn, ijsbier, maar tot zelfs ijsthee, daar zij in plaats van suiker- ijsklontjes in het kopje werpen.

title: ijsthee


text: Schumpeter

title: Schumpeter


text:
合十

Verb

 * 1)  to put the palms together before one usually as a Buddhist greeting

title: 合十


text:
雙手合十

Verb

 * 1)  to put the palms together before one usually as a Buddhist greeting

title: 雙手合十


text:
合掌拜

Verb

 * 1)  to put the palms together before one as a Buddhist greeting

title: 合掌拜


text: 双手合十

title: 双手合十


text:
合仔扇

Noun

 * 1)  folding fan

title: 合仔扇


text:
合仔椅

Noun

 * 1)  campstool; folding stool

title: 合仔椅


text:
gizləmək

Etymology
From, whence also 🇨🇬. The original meaning must have meant “to put in a box or bag, to store”. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬. Also cognate with 🇨🇬, which is possibly from 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to hide

title: gizləmək


text:
gizlətmək

Etymology
From.

title: gizlətmək


text: 皂莢

title: 皂莢


text: 皂角

title: 皂角


text: 皂荚

title: 皂荚


text:
gizlənmək

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to hide oneself, to hide

title: gizlənmək


text:
nunuh

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  breast (of a woman)
 * 2) milk

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  breast

title: nunuh


text: incunabels

title: incunabels


text: incunabeltje

title: incunabeltje


text:
雪文子

Noun

 * , especially its seed

title: 雪文子


text:
bolluq

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) abundance, plenty

title: bolluq


text:
decaglycine

Noun

 * 1)  An oligopeptide composed of ten glycine residues

title: decaglycine


text:
demihorn

Noun

 * 1) Either of two nasal processes that fused to form the horn of some dinosaurs

title: demihorn


text: demihorns

title: demihorns


text: deneddylated

title: deneddylated


text: inhammen

title: inhammen


text: inhammetje

title: inhammetje


text: inhammetjes

title: inhammetjes


text:
musiqi

Etymology
, from, ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) music

title: musiqi


text:
musiqiçi

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) musician

title: musiqiçi


text:
derecruitment

Noun

 * 1)  The failure of the lungs to be fully aerated, typically as a result of closure of an airway, and especially in the setting of ARDS.

title: derecruitment


text:
desorptive

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to, or causing desorption

title: desorptive


text: desulfates

title: desulfates


text: desulfating

title: desulfating


text: inwijkelingen

title: inwijkelingen


text:
digenomic

Adjective

 * 1)  Derived from two genomes

title: digenomic


text: Category:Azerbaijani terms inherited from Old Anatolian Turkish


text: jaarmarkten

title: jaarmarkten


text:
dimethyldiselenide

Noun

 * 1)  The organoselenium compound CH3SeSeCH3

title: dimethyldiselenide


text:
kokosnøtt

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a coconut

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a coconut

title: kokosnøtt


text:
Talk:OPDrms

Is the word order correct? --Pious Eterino (talk) 14:22, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

RFD discussion: February–March 2019
I brought this term to the Tea Room, where it was commented on by Lambian, who seems to agree that this is not a term we want. --Pious Eterino (talk) 13:30, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree (delete), it is usually styled ORDrms, which indicates that it is not a set term, merely a common combination of two other terms in a standard construction. - TheDaveRoss  14:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Not only do I seem to agree, I actually do agree that this entry should be deleted. --Lambiam 22:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:OPDrms


text:
diplococcic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to diplococcus

title: diplococcic


text:
discohesiveness

Noun

 * 1) The condition of being discohesive

title: discohesiveness


text: discoids

title: discoids


text:
leerie

Noun

 * 1) a lamplighter
 * 2) the light of a lamp, candle, etc.; a lamp
 * 1) the light of a lamp, candle, etc.; a lamp

title: leerie


text: disfunctional

title: disfunctional


text:
ductoscopy

Noun

 * 1) A diagnostic examination of the mammary ducts

Related terms

 * ductoscope
 * ductoscopic

title: ductoscopy


text: ductoscopies

title: ductoscopies


text:
hararsekigilo

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) hairdryer

title: hararsekigilo


text:
sekigilo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dryer

title: sekigilo


text:
dysvascular

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to vascular disease or malfunction

Related terms

 * dysvascularity

title: dysvascular


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/věďa

Etymology 1
According to Miklošič, related to, presumably reflecting an earlier *waiˀdjāˀ.

More recent proposals view it as a back-formation of an earlier *wēˀk-dāˀi, the dual of a derivative of synonym. Based on the alternating dual forms :. The reanalysis as a ja-stem is explained with the palatalization of velar + dental consonant clusters before front vowels.

Noun

 * 1)  eyelid
 * 2)  eyebrow
 * 1)  eyebrow

Descendants

 * East Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * (dialectal)
 * (dialectal)
 * (dialectal)
 * (dialectal)

Etymology 2
From.

Noun

 * 1) knowledge

Descendants

 * East Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:

Derived terms

 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/věďa


text: sekigilon

title: sekigilon


text: sekigiloj

title: sekigiloj


text: sekigilojn

title: sekigilojn


text: kokosnøtta

title: kokosnøtta


text: judaspenningen

title: judaspenningen


text:
User:Allahverdi Verdizade/Entrified

1948
Əziz Vətəndaşlarım!

Radiosunun verdiyi imkanlardan istifadə edərək bu gün Azərbaycan tarixinin ən böyük günü olan 28 Mayısda Sizlərə xitab edirəm. 100 il sürən Çar əsarətindən sonra bundan 35 il əvvəl Azərbaycan Şurayi-Millisi, Azərbaycan Cümhuriyyətinin istiqlalını bütün dünyaya elan etdi. o|O tarixə qədər milliyət olaraq varlığını isbat üçün mücadilə edən Azərbaycan xalqı, bu tarixdən etibarən millət olaraq bir dövlət qurmuş və bu dövlətin istiqlalı bütün mövcudiyyətilə meydana atılmışdır. Mədəni böyük bir tərəkəyə (mirasa) malik olan vətənimiz siyasət sahəsində çox böyük və dəyərli həmlələr göstərmişdir. Cavad xanın 1904-də Gəncədəki şanlı qəzası dillərdə dəstandır. "Ölmək var, dönmək yoxdur". Bu həqiqi vətənpərəstlərin təqlid etdikləri ən müqəddəs bir şüardır. İstiqlal uğrunda yapılan tarixi savaşların ən qanlısı 19-cu əsrin başlarında Rusiya Çarlığına qarşı yapılmışdır. 30 il qədər sürən bu savaş qəhrəmanlıqlarla doludur.

2020
İsveçdə koronavirusla mücadilədə niyə küçəyə çıxmağa qadağa qoyulmur? Başlığa çıxardığım suala İsveç hüquq sistemini araşdıran İsvecgundemi.com saytının əməkdaşı Atila Altuntaş cavab tapmağa cəhd edib. Dünəndən küçəyə çıxmağa icazə almalı olan Azərbaycan oxucusu üçün də maraq kəsb edəcəyini düşünüb həm bu mövzuda, həm də İsveçin koronavirusla mübarizə strategiyası haqda qeydlərimi bölüşmək istədim. Sərt karantin qaydaları Azərbaycanla yanaşı bir çox Avropa ölkəsində də tətbiq edilir. Bəzi yerlərdə küçəyə çıxanlar cərimələnir, bəzi hallarda tutulur da. İsveçdən savayı!

title: User:Allahverdi Verdizade/Entrified


text: hararsekigilon

title: hararsekigilon


text: hararsekigiloj

title: hararsekigiloj


text: kokosnøtten

title: kokosnøtten


text: deyir

title: deyir


text:
hawehoof

Etymology
From. Equivalent to.

Noun

 * , pier near a harbour

title: hawehoof


text: hararsekigilojn

title: hararsekigilojn


text: ölkələrində

title: ölkələrində


text: kokosnøtter

title: kokosnøtter


text: 老太爷

title: 老太爷


text:
vertaalwetenschap

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) translation studies

Usage notes
There is a subtle distinction between vertaalwetenschap and, with the former focusing on theoretical aspects while the latter has a more practical orientation.

title: vertaalwetenschap


text:
vertaalkunde

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) translation studies

Usage notes
There is a subtle distinction between and vertaalkunde, with the former focusing on theoretical aspects while the latter has a more practical orientation.

title: vertaalkunde


text:
eartip

Noun

 * 1) The tip of the external ear.
 * 2) A small earpiece or earplug.
 * 3) The part of an earbud that contours to the ear canal.
 * 4) The removal of the tip of a cat's ear, done to indicate that the cat has been fixed.
 * 1) The removal of the tip of a cat's ear, done to indicate that the cat has been fixed.
 * 1) The removal of the tip of a cat's ear, done to indicate that the cat has been fixed.

Verb

 * 1) To remove the tip of a cat's ear, in order to indicate that the cat has been fixed.

title: eartip


text: eartips

title: eartips


text:
老太爺

Noun

 * 1)  elderly gentleman
 * 2)  your father; my father or father-in-law
 * 3)  great-grandfather

title: 老太爺


text: 太爷

title: 太爷


text: kokosnøttene

title: kokosnøttene


text: ectomycorhizal

title: ectomycorhizal


text:
efrapeptin

Noun

 * 1) Any of a group of insecticidal peptides present in

title: efrapeptin


text: efrapeptins

title: efrapeptins


text:
electrogenically

Adverb

 * 1) In an electrogenic manner

title: electrogenically


text:
Talk:quod erat demonstrandum

is the plural attested anywhere? --156.34.250.173 15:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

 * See Advanced Book Search. —Stephen (Talk) 20:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

RFD discussion: February–March 2020
Not Portuguese. Canonicalization (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep; move to WT:RFVN. --Bakunla (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

 * RFD-kept; no rationale for deletion in this venue. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:quod erat demonstrandum


text:
electroneuromyographical

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to electroneuromyography

title: electroneuromyographical


text:
electropharmacological

Adjective

 * 1) electrical and pharmacological

title: electropharmacological