text:
User talk:Karl Dickman

Thank you
On Lutrinae ... (",) 108.195.138.129 (talk) 07:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Obsidian Portal
Hi, did you recently delete an 'Obsidian Portal' (the RPG campaign management tool) page entry? if so can you please explain why?

Cheers

Nick

NikMak71 (talk) 09:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)NikMak71

 * It was a very short article that did not credibly establish the importance or significance of its subject. Karl Dickman talk 09:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

 * OK, it was my first article as a wikipeia editor, and was up in place for all of 3 minutes by my reckoning. I am hoping to attract two three other people along to edit it and create a more detailed entry for it.   Do you mind re-instating what you deleted please? Give us a bit more time flesh out the article and, hopefully,  you will eventually see that it is a topic worthy of an entry.

Cheers

Nick

NikMak71 NikMak71 (talk) 09:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

 * I recommend working on it at Draft:Obsidian Portal and submitting it to Articles for Creation. Karl Dickman talk 09:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

ok, will do. thanks for the advice

Nick

NikMak71 (talk) 12:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eduard Riecke, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wilhelm Weber and Friedrich Kohlrausch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Chris Cuomo
Hello Karl,

Thanks for your input. I thought I addressed each reviser in a proper BRD cycle, but I'm a bit of a newbie here.

You stated that "insulting or inflammatory material" is a violation and referred me to the BLP policy. Interestingly, there is no reference to "insulting or inflammatory material" in the BLP policy. As far as the added material, it is simply a reference to a parody award promoted by the Blaze network (with an audience of over 10 million). It is simply a reference to pertinent pop culture material, not meant to be directly offensive. Consider the volume of "insulting or inflammatory material" produced by "Saturday Night Live", "Weird Al Yankovic" and other parody based humor venues. Are there no references in any BLP to their being the subject of parody? Is it strictly verboten or just entirely subjective?

fg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxgloves (talk • contribs) 08:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

 * Please discuss this at Talk:Chris Cuomo. Many different editors have reverted this addition, so it clearly needs more consenusus before being included. Karl Dickman talk 18:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Recent administrative action
I really think you should undo your recent blocks of User:Iryna Harpy and User:Clpo13 as it's clear their reverts were exempt from the 3RR restriction as they were reverting an obvious sock puppet of a indef banned user with a long history of abuse. (otherwise you might as well block yourself for edit-warring with this guy) See.

Also, in order not to incentivize indef banned user to sock puppet and edit war, you probably should change the protection level of the Self-arrest article and self revert your last edit (or let someone else revert it), although I am completely at a loss as to why you first reverted, then protected the page, since that would technically make you involved in the edit war. Thanks.  Volunteer Marek  13:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The anon's behavior at Holocaust in Poland made me feel that I needed to track down his other edits and deal with any other problems he may have caused. Because of his IP hopping, this required opening a lot of browser tabs to review all of his possible contributions. Unfortunately I had the protection dialog for self-arrest in the queue after the diff for the last change made to the page. My apologies. Karl Dickman talk 16:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I'm failing to understand how this edit could have happened as a result of anything other than a decision to revert the content back to the IP's edit. Please will you clarify? Burninthruthesky (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

What the heck are you doing here? Please unblock these editors. --Neil N  talk to me 14:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

And why did your add template protection to a non-template page? --Neil N  talk to me 15:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Looking at this, after a five year absence from adminning, you return and soon thereafter block two veteran editors and involve yourself in an edit war (as notes), siding with a LTA, and try to fully protect the article. You are aware that the IP is a LTA and still don't reverse your blocks. Please explain what you were thinking. --Neil N  talk to me 15:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I would describe blocking all parties to an editor war, and then lengthening the block of the anonymous user for egregious harassment, as taking sides. Karl Dickman talk 15:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Please explain why you did not reverse your blocks after becoming aware the IP was a LTA. --Neil N  talk to me 15:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The diffs on Self-arrest and Dixie indicate a legitimate content dispute. wrote on Talk:Self-arrest, "His abusiveness notwithstanding, the version as edited by IP is clearly superior to the one half of Wikipedia reverts to. WP:IAR and all that. To wit, it conforms to WP:REFERS, WP:GENDER, WP:NOTAMANUAL, WP:SELFREF, WP:WEASEL -- if I get the alphabet soup right -- unlike the old one. No such user (talk) 15:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)" If the anon's edits were more clearly of poor quality, I would have considered this vandalism reversion instead of an edit war.
 * This is characteristic of this anon. From the LTA page: "The principal problem with this case is that most edits made by this user are good-faith edits that are often supported by editors when looked at on their individual merits" Similarly, The instructions on the LTA page for this anon recommend "Report excessive verbal abuse," in contrast to many LTA pages that recommend blocking on sight, nor does it recommend blindly reverting all edits. Consult the block log. I blocked this anon in all its incarnations, first for 3RR, then lengthening the block for harassment.
 * From WP:3RR: "Even without a 3RR violation, an administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may report edit warring with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times." Again, if the edits being made were more clearly of poor quality I would have banned only the anon rather than all parties. Karl Dickman talk 16:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:3RRNO: "The following actions are not counted as reverts for the purposes of 3RR... Reverting actions performed by banned users, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users." If you block editors again for reverting socks I would not be surprised if there were calls to desysop you. --Neil N  talk to me 16:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I stand by my assessment that Clpo13 and and Iryna Harpy were edit warring even if they did not commit a technical violation of the 3RR. 3RRNO is not a get-out-of-jail free card for edit warring over a legitimate content dispute.
 * Shutting down an edit war and calling for discussion on the talk page (see here, here, and here) creates a "paper trail" that can be used to document consensus in the event of a future edit war. Karl Dickman talk 16:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You shut down an edit war very poorly and blocked editors don't get to partake in content disputes. Not only that, you used your admin tools to protect your preferred version. I suggest a reread of WP:INVOLVED is in order. If you think a blocked IP's edits are worth saving, then act as a regular editor. Example (involving the same IP):, --Neil N  talk to me 16:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There is never a way to shut down an edit war without offending everyone involved.
 * I do not have a preferred version of the article. As I wrote on Talk:Self-arrest, "I have already had to block three editors and protect the page to stop the edit war in progress here. The blocks will expire in 24 hours, except for the anon who has been blocked for a week for harassment. When the blocks expire, please use this talk page to come to a consensus about how the article should be written." The anon's edits may or may not be worth saving, but they are worth discussing, and are being discussed as we speak. Karl Dickman talk 17:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, it's obvious you think you've done nothing wrong. Fair enough. However, as I said above, similar actions in the future may raise questions about your adminship. --Neil N  talk to me 17:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

 * Karl, I've unblocked Iryna Harpy. As Neil and VM say, there's an exemption from 3RR for reverting a banned editor.  This whole "best known for IP" banning has evolved into something dysfunctional and dumb, but the solution can't be to block editors following the guideline/policy.  I also reduced the page protection to semi; we don't really use template protection on anything but templates.  When the template editor right was created, there was a fear that it was going to morph into a kind of "senior editor" badge for articles too, so we need to be vigilant about not letting that happen. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * A couple of other matters for your consideration: generally speaking, full protection is an alternative solution to blocking and when you opt for one, it usually renders the other option unnecessary. There is almost never a need to block an edit warrior if you full protect. It comes across as punitive and only serves to impede discussion rather than protect the project. Secondly, and  are both established editors in good standing who have contributed a combined tens of thousands of edits over several years—and they both had clean block logs. A clean block log is a source of pride for most of us sullying one can severely demoralize our community members. Blocking an established editor in good standing with a clean block log is not something that should ever be done lightly, period. People make mistakes but a clean block log is something that can never be recovered. In many cases (at least when edit wars are concerned), we opt for warnings or page protection rather than take such a drastic step over something that is usually quite petty. I'm not saying that users with clean block logs get a free pass, I'm just saying, consider if such a block is truly necessary for the protection of the project before nuking someone's clean block log. Full protection is usually a viable alternative solution and in many cases is preferable. Look, it's hard to ignore the fact that you have not been active in blocking in nearly a decade and have now issued these very questionable blocks. Wikipedia is a different place then it was when you were previously active in the mid 2000s. User activity is no longer growing, it is declining, and our human resources are more valuable than ever. Our job is to protect the project with our additional tools, not to needlessly antagonize the regulars.  S warm   ♠  17:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * This makes sense. I've already apologized to both blocked users. Karl Dickman talk 17:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Really? I only see this. Where is there any apology, or admission this block was directly contrary to policy?

 * I don't see any satisfactory response to these questions. Burninthruthesky (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * "This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a blocked editor (obviously helpful changes, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand)[.]" Karl Dickman talk 19:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that edits "must be reverted". Policy says that users are free to make such reverts. Burninthruthesky (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You said above you have "already apologized" to both users. I ask one last time, where did you apologize. If you did not apologize, please strike your false comment. Burninthruthesky (talk) 20:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * See above. Karl Dickman talk 20:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Where specifically? Burninthruthesky (talk) 20:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Their respective user talk pages. Karl Dickman talk 20:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

 * You'll have to excuse me if I appear to be missing something, Karl Dickman, but the only missive you've left on my talk page is ... and, yes, Swarm is absolutely correct about there being a sense of pride in having a clean block log. Thank you so much for the blot on my record (the log being something which many users, including myself, use to check whether other editors have fallen afoul of policy on particularly controversial articles within the scope of AR sanctions when evaluating the latest outbreaks of edit warring).

 * I'm not going to clutter this section with diffs unless you want to see the 'trail' of abusive, expletive-riddled comments left by the IP hopper on every editor who reverted the user's content changes talk page (and the ES to boot), but I would like to point out that I stopped reverting after my second reversion on the "Self-arrest" article in order to report the IP on the 3R board, and had no intention of implicating myself. In the interim, the IP was identified as being a particularly malicious user and was acting up at full throttle, drawing in more and more editors and escalating the level of abuse against them. Whilst, in normal circumstances, I don't simply revert everything without evaluating the content changes, having had to clean up after POV warriors and vandals after others have made further changes, I preferred to return to the trail in order to establish whether there were quality changes made this morning when I logged in. While, personally, I don't consider it desirable to simply revert, there are dire, speedy circumstances under which it is logical to revert everything: it can be revisited once activity has stopped.

 * As for your multiple block, please take a look through the archives of the 3R noticeboard and tell me how many parallel actions you can find by other sysops and editors authorised to issue blocks... --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for offering diffs, though I've already seen most of them. The anon's harassment on your talk page was the deciding factor in lengthening his block.
 * It appears I was mistaken when I said I apologized on your talk page. I'm sorry I escalated to a block. Karl Dickman talk 22:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I fully understand that it was all done in haste. I guess there's been a lesson in it for all of us. The outstanding moral I'm taking away is not to take on abusive editors writing nasties on other editor's talk pages when I'm supposed to be logging off for the day to make the evening meal. Hungry, chores to do, and a full day of taxing what little is left of my brain on Wikipedia is probably not likely to make for a good combination. Well, I'm straight back on the horse. Yes, I admit it, I've taken the Wikipediholism test... and I'm not proud of my score. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The lesson you should have taken is not to revert for no reason, not to stalk someone's edits and revert them just for the purpose of provoking them, not to harass them by repeatedly templating their talk pages, not to make false claims such as "I stopped reverting after my second reversion", not to leave childishly dishonest messages like this one, and not to force articles into a state where they violate the core policies of the encyclopaedia. You obviously haven't got a clue how disruptive you were being and you absolutely deserved to be blocked for your infantile behaviour.  186.9.132.15 (talk) 07:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Another block
This was a good block (and I noticed it as I previously warned the user) but mobile users do get new message indicators when using Wikipedia. --Neil N  talk to me 20:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

 * I guess I should take your word for it, but I edit on mobile frequently and have never received messages except in the desktop edition, even when I'm sure I should have received them. Otherwise I would have definitely left a warning, as most vandals desist long before it reaches the block stage. Karl Dickman talk 20:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a bell icon in the top right corner. And if you patrol AIV regularly, you'll see that enough people ignore warnings. --Neil N  talk to me 20:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I see the confusion. By mobile I meant the Android app. Just checked: no notification of your 20:08 message even though the desktop gave me a notice. Karl Dickman talk 20:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Out of curiosity, is the Android app you're using from the WMF? --Neil N  talk to me 20:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes it is . Karl Dickman talk 20:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The tags are "Mobile App Edit" for the Android app and "Mobile Web Edit" from a mobile browser. Mobile App Edit vandals may not receive any block warnings regardless of what is put on their talk page. Karl Dickman talk 20:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The mobile site does notify users with a bell icon, so if you see "mobile web edit" you can assume that they've been notified. S warm   ♠  21:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Video links
These videos ARE taken in Jeremy's house, got it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox_0l48TREk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMpFZ-OGP7I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRq4lQwRteM 21:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scott Rowland (talk • contribs)
 * This is, another LTA. --Neil N  talk to me 23:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Anything but Conservative
I haven't removed content. I have moved sections. I am performing clean up and restructuring the content but nothing is removed. 188.166.43.71 (talk) 00:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Will put edit summaries from now on so it is clear that nothing is being removed. Just restructured. 188.166.43.71 (talk) 00:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Hiroyuki Nishimura
When you protected the article, you lowered User:MelanieN's protection from 30 days to 1 day. Just making sure this is what you intended. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  01:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I did not. I had originally protected the page for 1 hour to give myself time to sort through the vandalism, then increased it to 1 day when I found out there was a 4chan thread going on. I didn't realize Melanie had upped the protection duration in the meantime. Karl Dickman talk 01:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

FYI
Hello KD. Just wanted to let you know that has returned to making the same edits after the block that you placed on them expired. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD|Talk 13:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Regarding IP user 2001:8003:620F:1B00:5861:E7E5:6517:7A22
Hi, I noticed that you warned IP user 2001:8003:620F:1B00:5861:E7E5:6517:7A22 about one of their edits (and reverted that edit). They made a total of over 2 dozen edits, almost all of them removing Category:American people of African descent or related categories from articles about African-Americans. I noticed this after their edit to Howard Sims (which I watch) and checked their other contributions on a hunch; I then evaluated, and wound up reverting, all their edits that had not already been reverted by other editors. While they appear to have stopped, I'm concerned that they might just have IP-hopped (or had their IP address change without their intending it) and be doing the same thing under another address. As I understand it, as an administrator you have some ability to check for that sort of thing? — GrammarFascist  contribs talk 13:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Sumit Girl
follow up: You protected against re-creation of this cv twice, for 30 days, Each time , the page was right after the month re-created & deleted. I've protected indefinitely and given an indef block to the editor.  DGG ( talk ) 04:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FBK2006.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:FBK2006.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FBK2006 editing A.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:FBK2006 editing A.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FBK2006 editing B.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:FBK2006 editing B.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FBK2006 alt group photo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:FBK2006 alt group photo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FBK2006 editing C.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:FBK2006 editing C.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BritishPostwarAircraft
Template:BritishPostwarAircraft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Missile specifications
Template:Missile specifications has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Aero-table
Template:Aero-table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:45, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bomber Scale-chart 1.jpg

The file File:Bomber Scale-chart 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Orphaned image of no enduring encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 06:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NatLeagAllStars by year
Template:NatLeagAllStars by year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
 * updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Split sequence
Template:Split sequence has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BilCat (talk) 01:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.

File:Ingo10k.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ingo10k.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Aerospecs
Template:Aerospecs has been nominated for merging with Template:Aircraft specifications. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 13:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Splck listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Splck. Since you had some involvement with the Splck redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Plantdrew (talk) 21:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:20, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

≘ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ≘. Since you had some involvement with the ≘ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. D.Lazard (talk) 16:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Backlog Banzai
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark
G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Foundation universe planets for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Foundation universe planets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Foundation universe planets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 13:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

March Madness 2020
G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

"Carn Dum" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carn Dum. Since you had some involvement with the Carn Dum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

"Template:Infobox missile" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Infobox missile. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 16:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open
G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SelfSSL

The article SelfSSL has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "No indication this software tool meets WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Reinstatement of "Development aid" category
Hello! I find that in 2005 you deleted the category "Development aid", which was at that time an empty category. I would now like to reinstate that category and populate it. Do let me know if you have any objection. Best wishes Mrmedley (talk) 02:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Martin XB-33 Super Marauder (schematic blueprint - 2).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Martin XB-33 Super Marauder (schematic blueprint - 2).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Missilespecs-met
Template:Missilespecs-met has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Missilespecs-imp
Template:Missilespecs-imp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rocket specifications-all
Template:Rocket specifications-all has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sbirthdecade
Template:Sbirthdecade has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」☎ Dinoguy1000 01:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee,  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  12:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Airtemp-test
Template:Airtemp-test has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

"The Conflict in Palestine" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Conflict in Palestine and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Category:Soviet and Russian command and control aircraft has been nominated for renaming
Category:Soviet and Russian command and control aircraft has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Soviet command and control aircraft

A tag has been placed on Category:Soviet command and control aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Otello(Rossini)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Otello(Rossini)&redirect=no Otello(Rossini)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:959 births

A tag has been placed on Category:959 births indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Karl Dickman


text:
Giacomo Leoni

Giacomo Leoni (1686 – 8 June 1746), also known as James Leoni, was an Italian architect, born in Venice. He was a devotee of the work of Florentine Renaissance architect Leon Battista Alberti, who had also been an inspiration for Andrea Palladio. Leoni thus served as a prominent exponent of Palladianism in English architecture, beginning in earnest around 1720. Also loosely referred to as Georgian, this style is rooted in Italian Renaissance architecture.

Having previously worked in Düsseldorf, Leoni arrived in England, where he was to make his name, in 1714, aged 28. His fresh, uncluttered designs, with just a hint of baroque flamboyance, brought him to the attention of prominent patrons of the arts.

Early life

Leoni's early life is poorly documented. He is first recorded in Düsseldorf in 1708, and arrived in England sometime before 1715. Between 1715 and 1720 he published in instalments the first complete English language edition of Palladio's I Quattro Libri dell'Architettura, which Leoni entitled The Architecture of A. Palladio, in Four Books. The translation was a huge success and went into multiple editions in the following years (illustration, left) Despite Leoni's often eccentric alterations to Palladio's illustrations, his edition became a main vehicle for disseminating the essence of Palladio's style among British designers. The direct impact of Palladio's text was upon building patrons, for these expensive volumes were out of the reach of most builders, who could consult them only briefly in a gentleman's library. In 1738 Isaac Ware, with the encouragement of Richard Boyle, third Earl of Burlington, produced a more accurate translation of Palladio's work with illustrations which were faithful to the originals, but Leoni's changes and inaccuracies continued to influence Palladianism for generations.

On the frontispiece of his edition of Palladio, Leoni titled himself "Architect to his most serene Highness the Elector Palatine." This claim, however, remains unsubstantiated.

Leoni followed his Palladian volume with an English translation of Alberti's De Re Aedificatoria ("On Architecture"), the first modern book on the theories and practice of architecture.

Works

Giacomo Leoni's principal architectural skill was to adapt Alberti's and Palladio's ideals to suit the landed classes in the English countryside, without straying too far from the principles of the great masters. He made Palladian architecture less austere, and adapted his work to suit the location and needs of his clients. The use of red brick as a building component had begun to replace dressed stone during the William and Mary era. Leoni would frequently build in both, depending on availability and what was indigenous to the area of the site.

Leoni's first commissions in England, though for high-profile clients the Duke of Kent and James, Earl Stanhope, first lord of the Treasury, remained unexecuted. His first built design in England was Queensberry House, 7 Burlington Gardens, for John Bligh, Lord Clifton, in 1721. This was to be an important architectural landmark, as the first London mansion to be built on a terrace with an "antique temple front."

Throughout this career in England, Leoni was to be responsible for the design of at least twelve large country houses and at least six London mansions. He is also known to have designed church monuments and memorials.

Lyme Park
In the early 1720s, Leoni received one of his most important challenges: to transform a great Elizabethan house, Lyme Hall, into a Palladian palace. This he did so sympathetically that internally, large areas of the house remained completely unaltered, and the wood carvings by Grinling Gibbons were left intact. In the central courtyard Leoni achieved the Palladian style by hiding the irregularities and lack of symmetry of the earlier house in a series of arcades around the courtyard.

The transformation at Lyme was a success. However, it has been claimed that the central Ionic portico, the focal point of the south front, was a little spoiled later by English architect Lewis Wyatt's 19th-century addition of a box-like structure above its pediment. This squat tower, known as a "hamper," is on the site of Leoni's intended cupola, which was rejected by the owner.

Leoni reconstructed Lyme in an early form of what was to become known as the Palladian style, with the secondary, domestic and staff rooms on a rusticated ground floor, above which was a piano nobile, formally accessed by an exterior double staircase from the courtyard. Above the piano nobile were the more private room and less formal rooms for the family.

In a true Palladian house (one villa designed by Palladio himself), the central portion behind the portico would contain the principal rooms, while the lower flanking wings were domestic offices usually leading to terminating pavilions which would often be agricultural in use. It was this adaption of the wings and pavilions into the body of the house that was to be a hallmark of the 18th-century Palladianism that spread across Europe, and of which Leoni was an early exponent. At Lyme, while the central portico, resting upon a base reminiscent of Palladio's Villa Pisani, dominates the facade, the flanking wings are short, and of the same height as the central block, and the terminating pavilions are merely suggested by a slight projection in the facade. Thus in no way could the portico be seen as a corps de logis. This has led some architectural commentators to describe the south front as more Baroque than Palladian in style. However, at this early stage of his career Leoni appears to have been still following the earlier and more renaissance-inspired Palladianism which had been imported to England in the 17th century by Inigo Jones. This is evident by his use of classical pilasters throughout the south facade, in the same way that Jones had used them, a century earlier, at the Whitehall Banqueting House and Leoni's mentor, Alberti, had employed them at the Palazzo Rucellai in the 1440s. These features, coupled with the heavy mannerist use of rustication on the ground floor with segmented arches and windows, is the reason that Lyme appears more "Italian" than many other English houses in the Palladian style and has led to it being described as "the boldest Palladian building in England."

Clandon House

In 1730 Leoni was commissioned by the 2nd Lord Onslow to build what is probably his masterpiece, Clandon House, near Guildford in Surrey. The result was a house of "exuberant grandeur and at the same time endearing naivety". This coupling of grandeur and naivety was to become Leoni's own style, as he mixed the Baroque and Palladian styles. Clandon was built of a fiery red brick, with the west front dressed with stone pilasters and medallion ornamentation. The interiors contrasted with the exterior: the huge double-height marble hall is in muted stone colours, to provide a foil for the vibrant colours of the adjoining suite of staterooms. The interiors were altered slightly later in the 18th century, but here the house was fortunate; the changes were made in the style of Robert Adam, so were sympathetic to Leoni's original intentions. The marble hall is considered one of the most imposing 18th-century architectural features in England, as are the magnificent plasterwork ceilings. From this point in time the house was largely unaltered, until the 2015 fire. A fire in April 2015 left the house gutted, apart from one room. Much of the architecture, walls, ceilings, floors and historic artefacts that the building housed were destroyed. The house currently remains a shell.

Moor Park

Leoni designed Moor Park, Hertfordshire, during the 1720s, assisted by the painter Sir James Thornhill. The commission was received from Bengamin Styles, an entrepreneur later to lose his fortune in the South Sea Bubble. Leoni completely redesigned the house, originally built for the Duke of Monmouth in 1680, giving it a massive Corinthian portico which leads into a vast hall with a painted and gilded ceiling, with a trompe-l'œil dome, painted by Thornhill.

The house was to have similarities with one of Leoni's more ambitious projects, Lathom House. Both were similar in concept to Andrea Palladio's never-built Villa Mocenigo, with great spreading and segmented collonaded wings embracing a cour d'honneur. Today, the wings have been demolished but the square corps de logis remains.

Lathom House (demolished in 1929) was a truly Palladian house with a large corps de logis, from which spread twin segmented colonnades linking it to two monumental secondary wings of stables and domestic offices. The secondary wings or blocks, each crowned with a cupola, were similar in style to those built by Henry Flitcroft for the Duke of Bedford twenty years later at the far larger Woburn Abbey.

Miscellaneous works

However, Leoni's clients were not always satisfied, especially when he designed for clients unaware of the intricacies of Palladian architecture. Leoni had been commissioned by Edward and Caroline Wortley to rebuild the decayed Wortley Hall in South Yorkshire. A magnificent residence arose. However, in 1800, the Wortleys complained they were unable to move in, as the architect had forgotten to build a staircase. One hundred years later, a Duchess of Marlborough made the same complaint against Sir John Vanbrugh's Blenheim Palace. Both owners had rather missed the point of a house built on a 'piano nobile' design. A piano nobile is the principal floor, usually above a lower floor or semi-basement. It contains all the rooms necessary for the grandees who inhabit the house. It usually consists of a central salon or saloon (the grandest room beneath the central pediment); on either side of the saloon (in the wings) there is often a slightly less grand, withdrawing room, and then a principal bedroom. After that perhaps would follow a smaller more intimate room, a "cabinet". The point both the Duchess and owners of Wortley had failed to grasp was that the owners lived in 'state' on the 'piano nobile' and had no need to go upstairs, hence only secondary/back staircases would reach the floors that were occupied by children, servants and less favoured guests. Indeed, these houses often did have a grand staircase, but it was external—the elaborate flights of stone steps to the main entrance on the piano nobile. From photographs of Wortley Hall, one can see the large, tall windows of the 'piano nobile' on the lower floor, and the much smaller windows of the secondary rooms above. It did not require a 'grand' staircase'. Wortley Hall survives today as a hotel; the owners still tell the story of the forgetful architect. Among Leoni’s other designs is Alkrington Hall in Middleton, now in Greater Manchester. Leoni also designed the longtime US Consulate building in Istanbul, the Palazzo Corpi.

Influence

Leoni was not the first to import Palladian Architecture to England; that accolade belongs firmly to Inigo Jones, who had designed the Palladian Queen's House at Greenwich in 1616 and the more ornate Banqueting House in Whitehall in 1619. Nor was he the only architect practising the concept during Palladianism. William Kent designed Holkham Hall in 1734 in the Palladian manner; Thomas Archer was also a contemporary, although his work tended toward the baroque style that had been popular in England prior to the Palladian revival. Palladian architecture was able to flourish in England though, as it was suited to the great country houses being built or re-modelled; because unlike the French, the British aristocracy placed primary importance on their country estates.

For all his work and fame, Leoni did not achieve great financial benefit. It is recorded that in 1734, Lord Fitzwalter of Moulsham gave him £25 to ease his "being in distress.". Later, as Leoni lay dying in 1746, Lord Fitzwalter sent him a further £8 "par charité" He is known to have had a wife, Mary, and two sons, one of whom is "thought" to have been a clerk to the great exponent of Palladianism Matthew Brettingham.

Leoni did not only design grand mansions. His lesser designs included an octagonal garden temple at Cliveden for Lord Orkney, in 1735; an elegant arch in purest Palladian tradition, at Stowe, for the Marquis of Buckingham; and a Portland stone bridge at Stone Court, Carshalton. Leoni is thought to have designed a new church when working for the 8th Lord Petre at Thorndon Hall, Essex. The original church had been swept away to make room for the new mansion he was designing there.

Today, it is difficult to assess Leoni's works as much has been destroyed. Amongst his country houses, Moulsham, built in 1728, was pulled down in 1816; Bodecton Park, completed in 1738 was razed in 1826 and Lathom, completed circa 1740, was lost like so many other English country houses in the 20th century. By the early 20th century, the style of Palladianism which Leoni's books and works did so much to promote, was so quintessentially English that the fact that it was regarded as purely Italian at the time of its inception was largely forgotten. So indigenous to England does it seem, that in 1913 – a time of huge pride in all things British – Sir Aston Webb's new principal facade at Buckingham Palace strongly resembled Leoni's 'Italian palazzo.'

Death and legacy
Giacomo Leoni died in 1746 and was buried in Old St Pancras Churchyard in London. His name is listed on the Burdett-Coutts Memorial, erected in that churchyard in 1879 by Baroness Burdett Coutts, listing the important graves lost.

By the time of his death, Palladianism had been taken up by a whole new generation of British architects working in the classical forms, and was to remain in fashion until it was replaced by the Neoclassical interpretations of such architects as Robert Adam.

His final intended publication, which would have added to an evaluation of his work "Treatise of Architecture and ye Art of Building Publick and Private Edifices—Containing Several Noblemen's Houses & Country Seats’ was to have been a book of his own designs and interpretations. It remained uncompleted at the time of his death.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Giacomo Leoni


text:
Category:Middle-earth Elves

This category lists members of the race of Elves in the works of J. R. R. Tolkien. __NOGALLERY__ The magic word __NOGALLERY__ is used in this category to turn off thumbnail display since this category list unfree images, the display of which is restricted to certain areas of Wikipedia.

 * High Elves, the Vanyar, Noldor and Teleri who left for Valinor, are included in Category:High Elves (Middle-earth).
 * Grey Elves, otherwise known as the Sindar, are listed more specifically under Category:Grey Elves.
 * All other Elves, including the Silvan Elves, Avari, and Elves of uncertain or highly mixed origins remain in this category.

title: Category:Middle-earth Elves


text:
User:No logo

No logo.

title: User:No logo