text:
User talk:Jprosen75

Hello Rosen, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
 * You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
 * You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the Community Portal.
 * You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
 * The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 01:59, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

AdaControl
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of AdaControl, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.adalog.fr/adacontrol2.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: AdaControl
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as AdaControl, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.adalog.fr/adacontrol2.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:AdaControl and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, AdaControl, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:AdaControl with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:AdaControl. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:AdaControl saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 12:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * To make it easy, if you own the copyright to the material (as you asserted on Coren's talk page), then please follow the instructions at Donating copyrighted materials. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Rosen. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Rosen~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AdaControl

The article AdaControl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Fails WP: N. I can't find any sources that meet the criteria to establish notability, and all of the sources on the article at the time of PRODing are primary. I found one paper that uses the code to test a source code quality metric, but one of the authors is affiliate with Adalog. I couldn't find anything else that could establish notability -- if dePRODing, please provide better sourcing and add it to the article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of AdaControl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AdaControl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AdaControl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. HyperAccelerated (talk) 14:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello, Jprosen75. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page AdaControl, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Aaron Liu (talk) 03:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jprosen75


text:
User talk:Jdcope

Hello Jdcope, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
 * You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
 * You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the Community Portal.
 * You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
 * The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 01:59, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Jdcope


text:
Mrs. Wilkes' Dining Room

Mrs. Wilkes' Dining Room is a casual restaurant in Savannah, Georgia, US which offers a menu of Southern US home cooking. Situated in a historic house dated to 1870, it is a popular dining spot in the city. The restaurant was owned and managed by Sema Wilkes for 59 years, from 1943 until her death in 2002 at age 95.

History
Mrs. Wilkes' Dining Room was previously the dining hall of the Wilkes House, a downtown boardinghouse. Today the restaurant is housed on the ground floor of the same historic house, built in 1870, at 107 West Jones Street. The restaurant was described by author William Schemmel as "a treasure hidden away in a historic district town-house." Its longtime owner, Sema Wilkes, published several cookbooks. her family continued to run the restaurant, serving lunch on weekdays.

Mrs. Wilkes and her restaurant have been the subject of newspaper and magazine articles. Japanese chef Hoshinao Naguma was once apprenticed to the restaurant.

Customs
Mrs. Wilkes' is noted for its homestyle traditions, in which guests are escorted in shifts of ten into the dining room, where a variety of dishes are freshly laid on one of several long tables. There is no menu; dishes are selected by the restaurant and change daily. Travel Holiday in 1993 recalled that the "tables were set with steaming bowls and platters of tasty Southern food".

The guests sit at the table and pass the dishes around to one another like a family. There are usually long queues waiting to get in.

Notable guests

 * David Brinkley once broadcast directly from the restaurant
 * President Obama ate at the restaurant with Mayor Otis Johnson and other guests in 2010, having baked beans, fried chicken, and sweet corn
 * Robert Duvall, Kate Smith, and Gregory Peck ate at the restaurant
 * The cast of Magic Mike XXL ate at the restaurant in October 2014

title: Mrs. Wilkes' Dining Room


text:
User talk:Mark alec

Hello Mark, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
 * You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
 * You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the Community Portal.
 * You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
 * The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 02:00, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mark alec


text:
Talk:Green Hornet

When Jack McCarthy Played The Green Hornet on the radio show
I changed the dates of when Jack McCarthy played the part of the Green Hornet to read: 1947 to 1952. In 1952 the show went off the air. I base those dates on two things: (1) Jack McCarthy was my father and I was a kid and remember the dates during those years; (2) Jack McCarthy's good friend, Dick Osgood, wrote a book "WXYIE Wonderland" (1981) in which all the dates are spelled out. I added Osgood's book as a reference. Jtmc (talk) 19:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Tom McCarthy April 19, 2008.

I wish people would stop changing the dates to reflect erroneous dates of performance just because they appear in print in some book. I was there when my father performer on the radio and I thought that first hand evidence trumps misinformation from some reporter who gets it wrong years later.

Titles?
I Was wondering if anyone had all the titles? In order of broadcast if possible. Also start And finish dates (years). Anyone interested the Action channel is showing GH episodes on Fri & Sat louie318@webtv.net

 * There's a link to Jerry Haendiges' radio logs at the bottom of the article. He's got as many as anybody, even though he thinks that a title he's seen on A script copy is more official than a title read on the air by the announcer/narrator, which by definition is not just on a script, but on the final version. Ted Watson 20:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

City?
Does anyone know from what city the Green Hornet operated? Is it ever revealed? Harvestdancer 19:07, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * I found a website that says it is Washington D.C., but I would like to be sure before I add that. Harvestdancer 16:33, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

 * I had always believed it was Chicago, but I can't find any evidence to support or refute that. Could it be a fictional city that is never explicitly named? [EDIT] On the official Phillip Jose Farmer/Wold Newton website, it is conjectured that the city is "possibly Detroit", but no evidence is given (probably taken from the fact that the Lone Ranger and Green Hornet radio series originated there).  I've searched about a dozen websites and two books and none mention the name of any city, let alone a conjecture as to what it might have been.  I did find that Warren Ellis places his Green Hornet/Shadow/Spider amalgam (Bret Leather, the Shadowy Spider) in Chicago, but like the Wold Newton "info", that's pretty much irrelevant. Canonblack 00:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC) [edit Canonblack 03:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)]

 * There is one radio episode called "Washington Story" where a case takes Reid/Hornet to Washington, D.C., which means he lived someplace else. Ted Watson 20:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

DVD
Are there any plans to release the show on DVD?

They are already on DVD.-Vmrgrsergr 21:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Bootlegs only, not official, licensed, or with "bells and whistles" of any kind. Ted Watson 21:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Robert Hall in lead, when?
I would like to talk with whomever is responsible for posting that Robert Hall's starring run as the Green Hornet ended in 1951. All other sources state that he turned the part over to Jack McCarthy sometime in 1946, but there is indeed evidence working against this, namely that the voice doesn't seem to change until much later in the run, judging from the audio recordings that I have. This is why I have not changed it to match ALL the other reports. The situation, however, is even more complicated. Jerry Haendiges' radio logs--there's a link at the bottom of the article--indicates no episodes were aired between September 1950 and September 1952, eliminating anybody's run ending in 1951. Contrary to this, however, is the following: He restricts the show being sponsored by Orange Crush to the late '52 final run, while early 1949 episodes were, like the majority of the run, "sustained," i.e., unsponsored. This is a problem relevant to the claim of hiatus because one of my audio cassettes bears the eps "The Face in the Television" and "Pretender to the Throne," which Jerry dates February 1949 and December 1952, respectively, but they both carry Orange Crush ads and the same actor in the lead, one who is NOT heard in what '47 and '48 episodes I have (The earlier performer might well be Hall, staying on here longer than anyone else thinks, as you indicate he did if not for as long as you did, and this other fellow McCarthy; if he's not Bob in '47 and '48, then there is an unidentified fifth lead actor, either between Hall and McCarthy or after McCarthy, PERIOD!). Furthermore, as the title of the allegedly earlier of those two episodes might suggest, TV is depicted as a casual fact of life, which is much more plausible in late '52 (and that is also consistent with the aforementioned OC sponsorship) than early '49, as Jerry has it. When I asked him if it was possible OC sponsored reruns as well as that Fall '52 new run (I specifically suggested within that two-year gap, but it has since occurred to me that after production shut down for good in December '52 is also a distinct possibility, especially given Dell's one-shot comic book with a September 1953 cover date), Jerry declined to acknowledge the question, although he DID reply to other points (such as the two-year hiatus, which nobody else suggests and which he assured me actually happened) raised in my email to him. I wrote back again, on Feb. 6, repeating this inquiry (and mind you, ALL of this was as diplomatic and polite as possible), but as of this date, no response (I just went and looked over my last email to him and it seems to me that he might have read only the opening, inconsequential paragraph thanking him for his prompt response, etc., and not noticed the comments inserted within the previous text; I'll try again). Note also, taking at face value the 1949 date for "Face...," with its lead actor who is definitely NOT Hall, contradicts the statement that he left in 1951 as posted on the article, so we definitely have something to discuss. I have been unable to identify you from the history listings, so, please respond to this. My intent here is for us to try and figure out the truth behind what certainly seem to be contradictions in the various reports of this show's history. Ted Watson 21:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Ted Watson 19:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

UPDATE: I took another look at the revision history listings, and did identify the editor responsible. He tells me his source was a book by John Dunning. Now if I can find a copy. A new listen to the 1952 episode, Pretenders to the Throne reveals that it contains a specific acknowledgement by announcer Fred Foy that its star is Jack McCarthy, BTW. Ted Watson (talk) 22:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

COMMENT I changed the dates of when Jack McCarthy played the part of the Green Hornet to read: 1947 to 1952. In 1952 the show went off the air. I base those dates on two things: (1) Jack McCarthy was my father and I was a kid and remember the dates during those years; (2) Jack McCarthy's good friend, Dick Osgood, wrote a book "WXYIE Wonderland" (1981) in which all the dates are spelled out. I added Osgood's book as a reference. Tom McCarthy April 19, 2008

Rutland "Green Hornet"
In 1946, Vermont's Rutland railroad received 4 steam locomotives painted green and yellow. The were nicknamed Green Hornets after the comic book character. Information from Model Rairoader, April 1989, pp117-118. Author Bruce P. Curry in Paint shop column conducted by Andy Sperandeo. 72.197.240.96 02:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)scmstr631

Separate article for TV version?
Despite the opening line, "The Green Hornet was an American radio program..." this article is (now) clearly about the character/property as a whole. The TV series was an unsuccessful (one season, in an era when mid-season cancellations were rare) spin-off and, despite the subsequent fame of co-star Bruce Lee, doesn't deserve its own article as much as the NOW comic book run. The section is as lengthy as it is simply due to the complex logistics of the production. I am a big fan of this character and have a video set of the series, but nevertheless vote against the proposal. Ted Watson 19:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No Article Division necessary, but the lead should be changed to make the article about the character rather than the radio program. -- Davidkevin 19:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Now that we have separate articles for each of the Hornet serials, I have begun to rethink my position on this proposal. It's becoming increasingly difficult to deny the validity of the TV version having its own article with minimal discussion here, but would this lead to the complex NOW Comics incarnation, itself a line--or range if you prefer--of comic books, also deserving its own article? Or even the original radio series itself (yes, this started out as an article on the radio show, but it isn't anymore)? Ted Watson (talk) 21:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

 * ... Why do we have articles on the two serials? I'm trying to think of how many potential readers would be interested in the (skimpy) information that we have on these two serials who are not interested in the Green Hornet.  That audience doesn't seem very large, and yet without such an audience, there's no reason to have that serial information anywhere except the main article.  To compare, if we ask who would be interested in an article on the TV version but not interested in the Green Hornet, the answer is "Bruce Lee fans", which it seems would be a rather significant audience.  (By similar logic, BTW, I would dispute that the TV version "doesn't deserve its own article as much as the NOW comic book run" -- yes, the publication history of the comic books is complex, and so apparently is its handling of the continuity of the property, but who is it significant to other than Green Hornet fans?) -- 209.6.177.176 (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

How about this, then--"The Green Hornet (TV series)" that redirects to this article? Ted Watson (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

 * I don't think there would be any harm in such a redirect. -- 209.6.177.176 (talk) 16:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I've made that redirect, fine-tuned to go directly to the TV section. Ted Watson (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Brown Hornet parody
Did Bill Cosby play the Green Hornet? 72.191.99.166 03:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Cosby did a syndicated radio parody of the Green Hornet, The Brown Hornet, who lived in a 5th-floor walkup, drove the White Beauty (a 1957 two-door Plymouth), and had an aide named Leroy. -- Davidkevin 19:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Patton's Nickname
I put Fact tags on this section because I've heard both versions of its origin, but have no written reference to either. Does anyone else have access to a written reference which can be cited? -- Davidkevin 20:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Removal of photo: Why?
Why was the photo of Al Hodge as Britt Reid (alias the Green Hornet) removed? Furthermore, when I tried to undo that, even though a note saying that this revision could be undone came up, the preview showed a box with code in it instead. If the photo is not available to be restored, why does the "can be undone" note show? (I am very surprised to see that I forgot to sign this. Very sorry. Ted Watson 20:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC))

Do not merge or rename
The Green Hornet is a charecter featured in comics books and TV show so it cannot be renamed.-Vmrgrsergr 21:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Herobox?
Should we get a herobox in here for the Green Hornet? He's been featured in comics and probably deserves one. Also could someone could find a reasonable picture that's free to use?Komodo 21:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comic book Black Beauty
The Pontiac Banshee seems to have been the model not the Corvette Indy Compare this cover image of the car: http://www.comicvine.com/comic/green-hornet-the/4308/33898/&i=45127 to these images Pontiac Banshee: http://members.tripod.com/~Proformula/banshee.html Corvette Indy: http://www.supercars.net/Pics?v=y&s=c&id=348&p=1986_Chevrolet_CorvetteIndyConcept1.jpg 9toes 18:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

 * You are quite correct, and thank you for waking me up to that incorrect reference. I did not even have to check your images, but simply went through my comic collection until I found the issue where the editor said as much in the letter column. I have now corrected the article, even including a citation to that statement. Again, thank you. Ted Watson 21:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Guns?
It's my understanding that in some incarnations of the character, he uses two specialized guns -- one which shoots knock-out gas, one which delivers an electric shock. Which incarnations introduced these weapons, and which later incarnations used them? -- 209.6.177.176 00:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

 * The gas gun goes back to the early radio days, possibly from the outset, but I'm not certain, as little of the first couple of years survives to be heard. The "electric shock" weapon, frequently compared to today's Taser guns controversially used by police, was created for the modern Hornet in the NOW Comics of 1989-1995. It was, however, something of a variation on the telescoping, sonic weapon of the 1960s television series, and shared its name, "The Hornet Sting." Ted Watson 22:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

News on Rogen film version
According to http://www.firstshowing.net/2007/11/29/seth-rogen-confirms-hes-writing-the-green-hornet/ Seth Rogen may be not just writing but starring in the film version. The article also has some hints about the screenplay, including that there is a "more comedic" and "less comedic" version. -- 209.6.177.176 (talk) 23:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Uhh... pictures?
How can an article like this go without pictures? I'll have to get some up ASAP. Ichormosquito (talk) 11:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Leo Records GH album
I deleted the passage about the Leo Records TV tie-in dramatic record for several reasons. The only "Leo Records" whose existence I could document--including the linked-in Wiki article--was a UK label specializing in jazz music and founded in 1979, too late for a tie-in to a TV series that ran 1966-67. Most of the cast that had articles were British political figures, also highly unlikely. And searches of "amazon.com" and the internet as a whole failed to turn up a mention of any such album--a soundtrack (music) album, yes, but no original audio adventures (and those two story titles don't suggest any TV episodes, which I would have expected, as well). I therefore find the entire suggestion too implausible to leave an uncited passage to that effect in place. Sorry, friend, as I respect a good deal of work you have done here. Ted Watson (talk) 18:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: revert of Johnny Dollar "called" versus "calling himself"
In the Comics section, I reverted "called Johnny Dollar" back to my "calling himself Johnny Dollar." This is a code name, like "The Riddler" of Batman fame, rather than a seemingly normal identity that is phony and assumed for legal purposes, such as Dollar's own Jonathan Dunhill. I feel that this needs to be made clearer than "called Johnny Dollar" does. Your feelings? BTW, you've generally been doing very good work on this article and I strongly recommend you register here. Ted Watson (talk) 21:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Black Beauty reverts
I am reverting the last two edits toi the Black Beauty passage of the Television subsection:

 * 1) The source cited there says the car used was a "Chrysler Crown Imperial."
 * 2) Having examined Katoman.com, I don't find that site particularly convincing or credible as an authority, and couldn't find the statement that the lights actually could be flipped. Furthermore, there is at least one scene in the series where the lights really should be in normal mode but are not, compelling evidence that the transition was not easy accomplished. --Ted Watson (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

TV series last date
Someone just changed the last date of the TV series from March 17 to March 24, 1967. Technically, neither of these are correct, as a few reruns were aired before ABC pulled the show off their schedule. Furthermore, the original airdate of the episode "The Hornet and the Firefly" is highly disputed. Some sources/episode guides skip December 30, 1966 and list "Firefly" on March 24, but others put it on December 30. Most likely, similar to the first episode of the Saturday morning cartoon version of Star Trek, it did air in December but was bumped on the West Coast only due (in "Firefly"'s case) to a breaking news story by the time the three-hour delay for regular programming came up (live sports coverage got in the way of the Trek debut out West). I am hoping to someday revisit the Dallas (TX) Public Library and their collection of TV Guide back issues and see if they label "Firefly"'s March 24 telecast a rerun (BTW, they list what everybody says is the following week's episode, "Seek, Stalk and Destroy" (!) for December 30, but I didn't think to check March 24 on that occasion; I'm embarrassed! One other thing: every source that puts "...Firefly" on March 24 instead of December 30 also lists "Ace in the Hole" and "Bad Bet on a 459 Silent" in reverse order; alignment on these two disputes seems to be 100%). So I'm reverting this back to the 17th, for now at least. --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Update
Could somebody update the film section? There seems to be some duplication with the feature films and recent developments sections and there hasn't been any details about the Ryan Reynolds casting. I may be able to add a free image of Seth Rogen at Comic-Con promoting the upcoming film, so it would be great if there was an updated section for the image to go with. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

 * The heavy duplication has occurred to me too. However, I'd prefer someone with a better idea of Wiki policy on which section is the more appropriate make the changes. Until then, I'll put whatever updates I find in both. However, what "Ryan Reynolds casting"? --Tbrittreid (talk) 21:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Source/reference error
The article has two instances for the same reference, but the year is different. Can someone who knows please verify the correct year? Murray, Will, "Where Hornets Swarm," Comics Scene #9, (October) 1989 or 1990? --SidP (talk) 07:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Done, and thanks for pointing it out. --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Split into several articles
This article should be split into multiple articles. There are many other "The Green Hornet" universe articles, so this should be a The Green Hornet fictional universe article.

 * The character should be moved to The Green Hornet (character) (or his alterego's name Britt Reid)
 * The TV show should be split to The Green Hornet (TV series)
 * The radio show should be split to The Green Hornet (radio show)

There's already a character article Kato (The Green Hornet), so a character article for Britt Reid/Green Hornet should be supportable.

76.66.197.17 (talk) 07:21, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Survey

 * voice your opinion on the suggested action here, with a rationale to support your opinion

Discussion

 * voice other comments on the suggested action here

I don't think retitling the remainder of this article with the parenthetical qualifier "character" is at all necessary, but I have come to feel, as I put forth in an earlier thread to that point, that maybe a separate article for the TV show is not a bad idea. Another for the radio series is dubious, however, as it is the medium in which "he" was born and where he had the longest run, and would therefore have to be heavily discussed in a character article. One for the comic books, on the other hand, is viable, as we already have Conan (comics) and Solomon Kane (comics), to name two that I am aware of just off the top of my head. Perhaps a more detailed discussion of the NOW version's multi-generational chronology would be appropriate in a Green Hornet (comics) article (as you can see, the title is already set up as a redirect to the section of this article). --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

 * I feel the charcter should be separate from the franchise, since it's hard to discuss the character in a franchise setting. So if the character were to remain at the prime name, then all the franchise stuff should be split off to say The Green Hornet (franchise). 76.66.197.17 (talk) 06:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I feel the Green Hornet should have a television section since it is a separate entity from the character and the article is bloated as it is. Dwanyewest (talk) 02:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I created a separate article and even provided sources.The Green Hornet (TV Series) Dwanyewest (talk) 01:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Unless there is a mass of third person information to justify a separate article for the green hornet as a character or the radio show then I see no reason for a split. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Mr. Big specifics
This new specific information on recurring villains Mr. X, Mr. Big and Oliver Perry is quite welcome, but I do have one problem. Where do the airdates come from? With the airdates given for Mr. Big, Jerry Haendiges' Vintage Radio Logs (see the external link to his site) doesn't have any titles, but he does have a switch from the NBC Blue Network to Mutual between what are claimed to be the last two episodes in that story arc. It's difficult to challenge him on such things, yet this doesn't make much sense, does it? Can IP 71.167.83.154 give his/her source(s) for these airdates? --Tbrittreid (talk) 21:11, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested move 1

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 13:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

The Green Hornet → — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Like any other superhero (for example, the Green Lantern), "the" is not an actual part of his name. The suffix "(comics)" is standard for comic book characters (for example, Whiplash (comics)). — the Man in Question (in question)  19:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have to disagree with both these suggestions. According to every reference provided in the article for radio, television and film appearances, and the official website of the copyright holder found at, it's "The" Green Hornet.  ( I would have no objection to a redirect from Green Hornet to the current page, which might be useful. There's a thorough disambiguation at Green Hornet already.)  And linking this character entirely to comic books ignores the origin of the character in radio, and his long and varied career on radio, television and films.  Also, I believe it's standard practice where a fictional character is split across multiple media platforms to maintain an unattributed central archive of information and then to split out sub-pages for individual media -- as has happened here with The Green Hornet (TV series).  Accounting4Taste: talk 20:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It is absolutely wrong to add the qualifier "(comics)" because, as Accounting4Taste says, that is not the medium of origin, and at more than one thousand episodes (according to Jerry Haendiges's logs connected in the article's External links section), the radio series also remains the most used medium for the property. Others have been no more than licensed tie in products. As for "The," there has been debate, at Talk:Spectre (comics) for example, about it being used this way, and I cannot see any validity to the position that it is a good idea: In almost every instance of a character with such a name (The Shadow has remained immune to this, because "The" is "capitalized in running text," at least in the pulp novels, and the guidelines explicitly allow its use in an article title in that situation, as I quoted), we have to have a redirect because that is how most anybody would put it in the search engine. In short, I deny that the guidelines have any right to be illogically arbitrary, which this one is. Or can someone cite a good reason for it? --Tbrittreid (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

"The" is used in his name, yes, but because it is not capitalized it is not a part of his title. If the suffix "(comics)" is somehow not appropriate, that's fine. But the inclusion of "The" is patently wrong. — the Man in Question (in question)  22:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Split From the section above the WP:RM there is a split request. I say we split the comics out into a separate article. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 21:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "Patently wrong"? I'll now ask the question I implied before: Why? What is a reason justifying the existence of this rule? I simply cannot conceive one, and without one the rule does not deserve to exist. --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:THE: "If the definite or indefinite article would be capitalized in running text, then include it at the beginning of the page name. Otherwise, do not include it at the beginning of the page name." In a sentence, the character is not The Green Hornet, he is the Green Hornet. — the Man in Question (in question)  01:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, that policy seems useful and appropriate, thanks for bringing it to my attention. It does admit exceptions, but I'm not sure if this would qualify as one or not.  My brief research revealed that in most media, the character is almost always referred to in title pages, etc., as "The Green Hornet"; it seems as though only in comic books does he lose the "The".  (It was almost always written in all caps, regrettably.)  Is this a distinction too fine to draw?  I'm going to look into this a little further. Accounting4Taste: talk 16:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The proper grammatical use of a mid-sentence capitalized "the" is almost exclusively limited to titles of works (i.e., titles in italics or quotes). The capitalization of The Green Hornet mid sentence is a grammatical error. — the Man in Question (in question)  17:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've e-mailed the author of a recent definitive work on the topic and asked him to comment on the usage in the source materials; original radio scripts and contemporaneous programme logs. My research has revealed multiple instances of both usages.  What seems to be a direct cognate of this situation at The Lone Ranger -- which fictional character is a blood relation of Britt Reid -- seems to me also to be of interest.  Accounting4Taste: talk 19:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The Lone Ranger article has "the" in the name because it is a reference to the body of work, not the character. Comic books about the Green Hornet are appropriately referred to as The Green Hornet comics. — the Man in Question (in question)  21:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for getting us back on topic. The capitalization question was brought up only as the explanation for "The Shadow" not being "Shadow (something)" in that Wikipedia article's title, contrary to Spectre (comics), Creeper (comics) and many others. Our point is indeed whether or not "The" should be in the article's title, and I do not see the lack of its capitalization in running text as any kind of justification for leaving it off. Rules just do not have the right to be arbitrary, especially to the point of contradicting common sense. An article's title is not running text, and in such a context the direct article "The" is invariably (except in Wikipedia) present, if after a comma (i.e., "Green Hornet, The"). The radio show, the serials, the comic books (despite the Grand Comics Database's listings of some series, you can see "The" in the logo on every cover scan they have, which is all but new Dynamite issues as yet unavailable) and the TV series the title is "The Green Hornet." --Tbrittreid (talk) 21:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

 * "The radio show, the serials, the comic books […] and the TV series the title is 'The Green Hornet.'" Exactly. Titles of works, italicized, use "The". It is a widely accepted precedent of English that uncapitalized "the" is not part of a name. A perfect Wikipedia example is Joker (comics) instead of The Joker. It's exactly the same as Nile instead of The Nile, Sahara instead of The Sahara, United States instead of The United States, Supreme Court of the United States instead of The Supreme Court of the United States, Black Spot (Treasure Island) instead of The Black Spot, etc. — the Man in Question (in question)  00:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

 * "It is a widely accepted precedent of English that uncapitalized "the" is not part of a name. A perfect Wikipedia example is Joker (comics) instead of The Joker."
 * Not when we are talking about a character's super-hero (or super-villain) type name, it isn't. Joker is not a perfect example to support your position, but in fact is no more than a typical example of how it this is currently being done here, and would be moved if the outcome of this very debate is that your position loses. Your other examples (and two of those articles really should be titled "Nile River" and "Sahara Desert", as those are the actual full titles of those geographic forms, but that's a whole 'nother debate) are completely different types of entities from these characters, and it is absurd to apply the same rule to both. The only reason no one can find instances of anyone calling the excluded pulp & radio hero "Shadow" is because no one addresses him to his face by any form of that name; his own agents call him "Master", others by his real name or an alias (to Margo Lane, for example, he is Lamont [Cranston], even though she knows the truth about him). And that's a major point: The only times that "The" is not attached to these characters' names is when they are being spoken to. Nobody says, "Now look here, the Green Hornet..." because that sounds stupid (and for that reason only), but it is always "Hey, look, it's the Green Hornet!" and this also applies to the Lone Ranger, the Spectre, the Creeper, the Joker, and God knows how many others; the lack of capitalization of "the" in running text does not overrule the fact that it is always present (except in dialogue spoken to the character) by any practical argument, only in arbitrary assertion. It would apply to The Shadow as well if anybody ever addressed him by that name in print (I wonder if it has happened in one or another comic book version). Relevant to this point, your example in your very first post here, Green Lantern, seems a choice calculated to mislead, as "the" has been rarely (I do not say "never") used in talking about him ("Green Lantern should be here soon" rather than "The Green Lantern should..." is standard usage for him/them). None of what has been said genuinely justifies titling any of these articles "Core Name (qualifier)" instead of "The Core Name" (and a qualifier if needed anyway). And note the qualifiers we would not have the other way, such as your own cited/linked The Joker; currently that's a straight redirect to the Batman villain's article, not directly to a DAB page or something. Nor has anything said to justify the exceptions that have been granted as exceptions been truly meaningful, either. Justification of this arbitrary (at least in reference to this sort of character name) and counter-to-common-sense rule is what I call for, and I say it is mandatory.
 * (If all that boldface puts you off, sorry. I tried using italics for emphasis, but in Preview mode I saw that they make the words lighter than the rest, which is de-emphasis. See "has" in parenthetical aside about Shadow comic books.) --Tbrittreid (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "Joker (comics)" would not be changed to "The Joker", because it conforms with WP:THE. The examples I gave follow the same rule (and are therefore valid examples) because grammar is economical. (The only exception I can think of is the capitalization of pronouns in reference to God.) Also, though not on topic, the correct names of "Nile" and "Sahara" are "Nile" and "Sahara". The addition of the suffixes such as "River" and "Desert" is employed by governments, etc., for the purposes of organization, but has no substantive meaning. — the Man in Question (in question)  00:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Will you cease the evasions and deal with what I have actually said, that I have challenged the validity of the rule? This means that your pointing out that Joker (comics) conforms to the rule is no refutation of what I said about it at all, which was that your describing it as "a perfect example" working against my position was incorrect, that it merely was a typical example of what I'm saying is incorrect per common sense, and it would indeed be reverted if my position prevails in this dispute. I have no idea what you mean by "grammar is economical" because this rule is wasteful, often necessitating otherwise unneeded qualifiers, as in The Joker versus Joker (comics), both of which go to the exact same page, as previously noted. This selective misrepresentation constitutes failing to discuss in good faith, and it won't convince any intelligent and fair-minded editor that you are right and I am wrong, but strongly suggests that you are wrong since you can't come up with anything valid to say in defense of your position. So I strongly advise you to drop it. To show you how honest and fair *I* am, I admit to a factual error: The 1940s Harvey Comics run of comic books starring the Green Hornet (#s 6–47) has "The" in the cover logo only once (The New Green Hornet Fights Crime, #41, September 1948; why "New" I have no idea). Since the title was never less than Green Hornet Comics, I don't see it as invalidating my point.

 * I have previously stated that no rule of writing has the right to be arbitrary and in opposition to the common sense of the situation at hand, which is exactly what we have here. From this, we have the right to say here that it is wrong, and perhaps plant a seed that would lead to this common sense finding its way into writing guides across the English writing world. As the discussion started here, I feel that it would be best to reach the sensible consensus here and take that to the relevant WP MoS page. Now deal with what is actually in my posts! --Tbrittreid (talk) 20:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't mean to evade anything. I guess I just don't see how you're not familiar with the rule that "the" is only included in works titles or a few governmentally sanctioned placenames. — the Man in Question (in question)  21:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

"I don't mean to evade anything." Like hell you don't, because you've done it again. You can't write as clear and "mechanically" accurate as you do and be too retarded to understand that I am saying that the rule is WRONG and needs to be changed, to add these kind of character names to the exception you just indicated. --Tbrittreid (talk) 21:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

 * Move to Green Hornet. Whiplash was a bad example; it is an ambiguious term.  The less ambiguous heroes like Superman don't contain the word comics in their title  Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken)  (Locker) 00:53, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This is absolutely no argument to remove "The" which is the issue here. If it were removed, some qualifier would be absolutely necessary. However, I point to my unaddressed arguments above to keep it. Furthermore, I even deny that there is any general rule about this, only the Wikipedia guidelines which are certainly open to dispute. I have never encountered any encyclopedia or other analogous information source which formats article titles with parenthetical qualifiers, and virtually all included the article "The" in cases such as these characters, even if after a comma (e.g., "Green Hornet, The"), which I've mentioned before. --Tbrittreid (talk) 19:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) The use of parenthetical qualifiers is not debatable on Wikipedia. The encyclopedias which do not use them use superscript numbers instead. 2) Other encyclopedias to do not use "the" except where it is capitalized as part of a proper name, such as the title of a work. This is not up for debate, as it is also Wikipedia policy. The Encyclopedia Britannica (which does use parenthetical qualifiers) has "The Green Hornet (television series)" because it is in reference to the series, not the character, as evidenced by the parenthetical qualifier "(television series)". — the Man in Question  (in question)  19:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not quite. WP:THE is not a policy, it's a "guideline", and as the box at the very top states: "It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply."  One of the authors of The Green Hornet: A History of Radio, Motion Pictures, Comics, and Television has told me in a personal communication that the creator, Fran Striker, acknowledged the capitalization of the "T" in 1939 in writing, "as that is his name in full".  Personal communications are, of course, not useful here; I've ordered a copy of the book and hope to bring a relevant citation to this discussion.  In the meantime, perhaps a few deep breaths and a cup of tea would be in order.  Accounting4Taste: talk 20:17, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You are right. Policy vs. guidelines is a valid distinction. I'm sorry. The author's use of "the", however, is not. "The" cannot properly be capitalized in a personal name in the English language, so if the author capitalized "the", he was making a grammatical error. However, I am sick of this discussion, so I wash my hands of it. Do with this page what you will. — the Man in Question (in question)

Glad to hear it, you unreasonable jerk. The English language is fluid, evolving, so such rules are indeed open to debate, especially in the light of common sense. And I stand by my statement that I have never encountered denying "The" on article titles and the like for such character names anywhere else. Furthermore, I have no idea what relevancy "superscript numbers" has to this discussion. --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Support move as nominated per WP:THE and reasons set out in detail above. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:15, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not supported. I disagree with moving this for the reasons I've set out above; I think this is an exception to WP:THE.  Accounting4Taste: talk 04:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose The Green Hornet is The Green Hornet, that is the name of the character, and that is the natural mode of disambiguation.  Also, as has been noted, the character did not originate in the comics. Rejectwater (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I received my copy of The Green Hornet: A History of Radio, Motion Pictures, Comics, and Television today. It's 800 pages (!), so I haven't had time to give it the attention it deserves, but a random sampling tells me that the authors consistently capitalize the word "The" when the name "The Green Hornet" appears in the middle of a sentence. From the Introduction, page ix: "Like The Lone Ranger, The Green Hornet never killed or permanently injured anybody." I have yet to find the specific material of which I was informed by the author; give me a few weeks. (800 pages!!)  Accounting4Taste: talk 02:14, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Green Hornet appearing in other movies
In the 2010 movie Jing mo fung wan: Chen Zhen, a martial arts movie with Donnie Yen, and a sequel to Fist of Fury with bruce Lee. In Jing mo fu wan: Chen Zhen, the main character dresses up in a Green Hornet suit (SEE EDIT NOTE), in order to gain an undercover identity to fight the Japanese. He gains the suit from a costume shop right beside a cinema with a poster of a (fictional?) movie called Masked Warrior. His alter ego is occasionally referred to as "The Green Hornet" in the movie by people reading newspapers etc. This is historically incorrect, though, since the movie of Jing mo fung wan: Chen Zhen is taking place before the release of the first The Green Hornet movie.

This is obviously a reference to Bruce Lee's participation in the role of Kato in the movies of The Green Hornet from 1967-1974, since Bruce Lee was the creator of the character Chen Zhen, who Donnie Yen now is inheriting in the movie.

I would be glad to see any of this noted in the wiki page.

EDIT NOTE: I found out that it's in fact not the suit of The Green Hornet, but his sidekick, Kato.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1456661/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.69.47.91 (talk) 10:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Why is The Legend of the Fist listed under Green Hornet in Other Films? Chen Zhen had nothing to do with The Green Hornet; even though he does dress like Kato, this section is only for The Green Hornet cannon in other media (cartoon, film, theater, television, etc.), not every last minuscule, random mention of the name of, or imitation of, a character in irrelevant media sources.98.246.50.225 (talk) 02:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

TV Series cancellation
I removed the following entry: "People interested in the series became convinced that it only lasted one season because the times were considered too tense for straight handling of comic characters."

First, that it wildly unsupported. Who are these "people interested in the series"? Fans? Scholars? How d'd they "become convinced?" Focus groups? Brain washing? Did Van Williams take away their pain? Was it even more than one person? Also, the sentence is badly written: "the times were considered too tense" is an awkward way of speaking about the social climate of the era. Ssosmcin (talk) 15:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 2

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move to Green Hornet - Because this article is about the character and not the franchise, the definite article qualifies the title rather than being part of it. Wikipedia's naming conventions with respect to definite and indefinite articles at the beginning of the name require qualifying definite articles to be removed. Neelix (talk) 13:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

The Green Hornet → Green Hornet – Tenebrae (talk) 22:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy oppose ; no reason given for move. Powers T 23:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support; obviously the primary topic for the title, and I agree the definite article is undesirable here because it's not the title of a movie or a radio serial, but the character and franchise itself. Powers T 13:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support: The reasons are present at Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name), which includes fictional characters such as this specifically here. This article's title is a clear violation of Wikipedia's naming convention. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose Green Hornet is a disambiguation page. Seems to serve its purpose well enough. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * See discussion at Talk:Green Hornet re: renaming it "Green Hornet (disambiguation)". Also, "Seems to serve its purpose well enough" seems a bit vague. Not sure how "Green Hornet (disambiguation)" would serve purpose any less, while allowing us to follow policy here. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

--Bob247 (talk) 06:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose Exempt from WP:THE like The Lone Ranger. The is part of the characters name.
 * No more so than The Joker or The Spirit or The Hulk or.... The Phantom refers to the proper-noun title of the comic strip, not the character. The Shadow refers to the franchise, not the character. It's an MOS vio at The Lone Ranger. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose per WP:THE. The full character's name, and the character's most common name in general usage (including, as mentioned in the previous move discussion, most unofficial sources and works based on the character) is "The Green Hornet". Zzyzx11 (talk) 05:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support weakly.
 * If this article were about the general "franchise" or was about the show I could see keeping "The". It isn't, it's about the characters. WP:THE in the "General usage" is relatively clear:
 * "When a proper name is almost always used with capitalized "The", especially if it is included by unofficial sources, we should include it."
 * "...almost always..." would bean that when the character is mentions, even in running text it would be as "The Green Hornet". Common usage though in this case is for "The" to only be used at the start of sentences in regards to the character. Similar guidelines to look at are WP:DEFINITE and since it's one of the Projects looking over this article, WP:NCC/THE.
 * The only reason I'm qualifying my support is WP:COMMONNAME (WP:NM is not relevant here since it relates to music) would go a long way in supporting the current title. The character is routinely referred to as "the Green Hornet" implying the "the" should be included. Which leaves use with two guidelines (or is it two sections of the same guideline...) pointing in opposite directions for this article. Either way it is going to be an exception to one of them. In that light I am more inclined to support WP:THE in this instance.
 * - J Greb (talk) 04:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Support, in line with Penguin (comics) and Flash (DC Comics character). Andrewa (talk) 15:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lone Ranger connection?
Should there be a mention of Reid's backstory as the Lone Ranger's great nephew or whatever it was? Is there any reliable material that mentions it or no? 67.186.120.41 (talk) 06:12, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Air times
Anybody have info to include any air times for the radio and TV shows, for first episodes at least if they moved around too much to document? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.223.11.201 (talk) 00:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Green Hornet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110308023555/http://www.blackbeltmag.com/kato_and_the_green_hornet_revived_by_aurelien_poitrimoult/archives/582 to http://www.blackbeltmag.com/kato_and_the_green_hornet_revived_by_aurelien_poitrimoult/archives/582
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110111131649/http://www.carlsjr.com/company/releases/carls-jr-and-the-green-hornet-bring-action-packed-excitement-to-the-drive-thru-with-sony-pictures-deal to http://www.carlsjr.com/company/releases/carls-jr-and-the-green-hornet-bring-action-packed-excitement-to-the-drive-thru-with-sony-pictures-deal

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Crossover with Dick Tracy
I don't know if it could be mentionned, there's a crossover of the Green Hornet comic strip with Dick Tracy had beginned recently. http://dicktracy.info/2018-dick-tracy-green-hornet-crossover/ http://www.gocomics.com/dicktracy/2018/04/10 --Sd-100 (talk) 17:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Green Hornet


text:
User talk:Roopa prabhu

Hello Roopa prabhu, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
 * You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
 * You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the Community Portal.
 * You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
 * The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 02:01, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roopa prabhu


text:
Membrane transport

In cellular biology, membrane transport refers to the collection of mechanisms that regulate the passage of solutes such as ions and small molecules through biological membranes, which are lipid bilayers that contain proteins embedded in them. The regulation of passage through the membrane is due to selective membrane permeability – a characteristic of biological membranes which allows them to separate substances of distinct chemical nature. In other words, they can be permeable to certain substances but not to others.

The movements of most solutes through the membrane are mediated by membrane transport proteins which are specialized to varying degrees in the transport of specific molecules. As the diversity and physiology of the distinct cells is highly related to their capacities to attract different external elements, it is postulated that there is a group of specific transport proteins for each cell type and for every specific physiological stage. This differential expression is regulated through the differential transcription of the genes coding for these proteins and its translation, for instance, through genetic-molecular mechanisms, but also at the cell biology level: the production of these proteins can be activated by cellular signaling pathways, at the biochemical level, or even by being situated in cytoplasmic vesicles. The cell membrane regulates the transport of materials entering and exiting the cell.

Background
Thermodynamically the flow of substances from one compartment to another can occur in the direction of a concentration or electrochemical gradient or against it. If the exchange of substances occurs in the direction of the gradient, that is, in the direction of decreasing potential, there is no requirement for an input of energy from outside the system; if, however, the transport is against the gradient, it will require the input of energy, metabolic energy in this case. For example, a classic chemical mechanism for separation that does not require the addition of external energy is dialysis. In this system a semipermeable membrane separates two solutions of different concentration of the same solute. If the membrane allows the passage of water but not the solute the water will move into the compartment with the greatest solute concentration in order to establish an equilibrium in which the energy of the system is at a minimum. This takes place because the water moves from a high solvent concentration to a low one (in terms of the solute, the opposite occurs) and because the water is moving along a gradient there is no need for an external input of energy.

Cell membrane scheme.png

1. phospholipid 2. cholesterol 3. glycolipid 4. sugar 5. polytopic protein (transmembrane protein) 6. monotopic protein (here, a glycoprotein) 7. monotopic protein anchored by a phospholipid 8. peripheral monotopic protein (here, a glycoprotein.)]]

The nature of biological membranes, especially that of its lipids, is amphiphilic, as they form bilayers that contain an internal hydrophobic layer and an external hydrophilic layer. This structure makes transport possible by simple or passive diffusion, which consists of the diffusion of substances through the membrane without expending metabolic energy and without the aid of transport proteins. If the transported substance has a net electrical charge, it will move not only in response to a concentration gradient, but also to an electrochemical gradient due to the membrane potential.

As few molecules are able to diffuse through a lipid membrane the majority of the transport processes involve transport proteins. These transmembrane proteins possess a large number of alpha helices immersed in the lipid matrix. In bacteria these proteins are present in the beta lamina form. This structure probably involves a conduit through hydrophilic protein environments that cause a disruption in the highly hydrophobic medium formed by the lipids. These proteins can be involved in transport in a number of ways: they act as pumps driven by ATP, that is, by metabolic energy, or as channels of facilitated diffusion.

Thermodynamics
A physiological process can only take place if it complies with basic thermodynamic principles. Membrane transport obeys physical laws that define its capabilities and therefore its biological utility.

A general principle of thermodynamics that governs the transfer of substances through membranes and other surfaces is that the exchange of free energy, ΔG, for the transport of a mole of a substance of concentration C1 in a compartment to another compartment where it is present at C2 is:

 * $$\Delta G = RT \log \frac{C_2}{C_1}$$

When C2 is less than C1, ΔG is negative, and the process is thermodynamically favorable. As the energy is transferred from one compartment to another, except where other factors intervene, an equilibrium will be reached where C2=C1, and where ΔG = 0. However, there are three circumstances under which this equilibrium will not be reached, circumstances which are vital for the in vivo functioning of biological membranes:
 * The macromolecules on one side of the membrane can bond preferentially to a certain component of the membrane or chemically modify it. In this way, although the concentration of the solute may actually be different on both sides of the membrane, the availability of the solute is reduced in one of the compartments to such an extent that, for practical purposes, no gradient exists to drive transport.
 * A membrane electrical potential can exist which can influence ion distribution. For example, for the transport of ions from the exterior to the interior, it is possible that:
 * $$\Delta G = RT \log \frac{C_{inside}}{C_{outside}}+ZF \Delta P$$

Where F is Faraday's constant and ΔP the membrane potential in volts. If ΔP is negative and Z is positive, the contribution of the term ZFΔP to ΔG will be negative, that is, it will favor the transport of cations from the interior of the cell. So, if the potential difference is maintained, the equilibrium state ΔG = 0 will not correspond to an equimolar concentration of ions on both sides of the membrane.
 * If a process with a negative ΔG is coupled to the transport process then the global ΔG will be modified. This situation is common in active transport and is described thus:
 * $$\Delta G = RT \log \frac{C_\text{inside}}{C_\text{outside}}+\Delta G^b$$

Where ΔGb corresponds to a favorable thermodynamic reaction, such as the hydrolysis of ATP, or the co-transport of a compound that is moved in the direction of its gradient.

Passive diffusion and active diffusion
As mentioned above, passive diffusion is a spontaneous phenomenon that increases the entropy of a system and decreases the free energy. The transport process is influenced by the characteristics of the transport substance and the nature of the bilayer. The diffusion velocity of a pure phospholipid membrane will depend on:
 * concentration gradient,
 * hydrophobicity,
 * size,
 * charge, if the molecule has a net charge.
 * temperature

Active and co-transport
In active transport a solute is moved against a concentration or electrochemical gradient; in doing so the transport proteins involved consume metabolic energy, usually ATP. In primary active transport the hydrolysis of the energy provider (e.g. ATP) takes place directly in order to transport the solute in question, for instance, when the transport proteins are ATPase enzymes. Where the hydrolysis of the energy provider is indirect as is the case in secondary active transport, use is made of the energy stored in an electrochemical gradient. For example, in co-transport use is made of the gradients of certain solutes to transport a target compound against its gradient, causing the dissipation of the solute gradient. It may appear that, in this example, there is no energy use, but hydrolysis of the energy provider is required to establish the gradient of the solute transported along with the target compound. The gradient of the co-transported solute will be generated through the use of certain types of proteins called biochemical pumps.

The discovery of the existence of this type of transporter protein came from the study of the kinetics of cross-membrane molecule transport. For certain solutes it was noted that the transport velocity reached a plateau at a particular concentration above which there was no significant increase in uptake rate, indicating a log curve type response. This was interpreted as showing that transport was mediated by the formation of a substrate-transporter complex, which is conceptually the same as the enzyme-substrate complex of enzyme kinetics. Therefore, each transport protein has an affinity constant for a solute that is equal to the concentration of the solute when the transport velocity is half its maximum value. This is equivalent in the case of an enzyme to the Michaelis–Menten constant.

Some important features of active transport in addition to its ability to intervene even against a gradient, its kinetics and the use of ATP, are its high selectivity and ease of selective pharmacological inhibition

Secondary active transporter proteins

Secondary active transporter proteins move two molecules at the same time: one against a gradient and the other with its gradient. They are distinguished according to the directionality of the two molecules:

Both can be referred to as co-transporters.
 * antiporter (also called exchanger or counter-transporter): move a molecule against its gradient and at the same time displaces one or more ions along its gradient. The molecules move in opposite directions.
 * symporter: move a molecule against its gradient while displacing one or more different ions along their gradient. The molecules move in the same direction.

Pumps

A pump is a protein that hydrolyses ATP to transport a particular solute through a membrane, and in doing so, generating an electrochemical gradient membrane potential. This gradient is of interest as an indicator of the state of the cell through parameters such as the Nernst potential. In terms of membrane transport the gradient is of interest as it contributes to decreased system entropy in the co-transport of substances against their gradient. One of the most important pumps in animal cells is the sodium potassium pump, that operates through the following mechanism:

 * 1) binding of three Na+ ions to their active sites on the pump which are bound to ATP.
 * 2) ATP is hydrolyzed leading to phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic side of the pump, this induces a structure change in the protein. The phosphorylation is caused by the transfer of the terminal group of ATP to a residue of aspartate in the transport protein and the subsequent release of ADP.
 * 3) the structure change in the pump exposes the Na+ to the exterior. The phosphorylated form of the pump has a low affinity for Na+ ions so they are released.
 * 4) once the Na+ ions are liberated, the pump binds two molecules of K+ to their respective bonding sites on the extracellular face of the transport protein. This causes the dephosphorylation of the pump, reverting it to its previous conformational state, transporting the K+ ions into the cell.
 * 5) The unphosphorylated form of the pump has a higher affinity for Na+ ions than K+ ions, so the two bound K+ ions are released into the cytosol. ATP binds, and the process starts again.

Membrane selectivity
As the main characteristic of transport through a biological membrane is its selectivity and its subsequent behavior as a barrier for certain substances, the underlying physiology of the phenomenon has been studied extensively. Investigation into membrane selectivity have classically been divided into those relating to electrolytes and non-electrolytes.

Electrolyte selectivity
The ionic channels define an internal diameter that permits the passage of small ions that is related to various characteristics of the ions that could potentially be transported. As the size of the ion is related to its chemical species, it could be assumed a priori that a channel whose pore diameter was sufficient to allow the passage of one ion would also allow the transfer of others of smaller size, however, this does not occur in the majority of cases. There are two characteristics alongside size that are important in the determination of the selectivity of the membrane pores: the facility for dehydration and the interaction of the ion with the internal charges of the pore.

In order for an ion to pass through a pore it must dissociate itself from the water molecules that cover it in successive layers of solvation. The tendency to dehydrate, or the facility to do this, is related to the size of the ion: larger ions can do it more easily that the smaller ions, so that a pore with weak polar centres will preferentially allow passage of larger ions over the smaller ones. When the interior of the channel is composed of polar groups from the side chains of the component amino acids, the interaction of a dehydrated ion with these centres can be more important than the facility for dehydration in conferring the specificity of the channel. For example, a channel made up of histidines and arginines, with positively charged groups, will selectively repel ions of the same polarity, but will facilitate the passage of negatively charged ions. Also, in this case, the smallest ions will be able to interact more closely due to the spatial arrangement of the molecule (stericity), which greatly increases the charge-charge interactions and therefore exaggerates the effect.

Non-electrolyte selectivity
Non-electrolytes, substances that generally are hydrophobic and lipophilic, usually pass through the membrane by dissolution in the lipid bilayer, and therefore, by passive diffusion. For those non-electrolytes whose transport through the membrane is mediated by a transport protein the ability to diffuse is, generally, dependent on the partition coefficient K. Partially charged non-electrolytes, that are more or less polar, such as ethanol, methanol or urea, are able to pass through the membrane through aqueous channels immersed in the membrane. There is no effective regulation mechanism that limits this transport, which indicates an intrinsic vulnerability of the cells to the penetration of these molecules.

Creation of membrane transport proteins
There are several databases which attempt to construct phylogenetic trees detailing the creation of transporter proteins. One such resource is the Transporter Classification database

title: Membrane transport


text:
User talk:Alisajjad

Hello Alisajjad, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
 * You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
 * You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the Community Portal.
 * You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
 * The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 02:01, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ali sajjad
A tag has been placed on Ali sajjad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Epbr123 (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Elephant has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.d ela noy gabs adds 01:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alisajjad


text:
MDFMK (album)

MDFMK is an album released by industrial rock band MDFMK on March 28, 2000. It was the only studio album released by the band before it was discontinued and reformed once again as KMFDM. In a 2003 interview, band leader Sascha Konietzko said the album had sold around 120,000 copies.

Personnel

 * Lucia Cifarelli - vocals
 * Sascha Konietzko - vocals, percussion, programming
 * Tim Skold - vocals, guitar, bass, programming

title: MDFMK (album)


text:
Applied anthropology

Applied anthropology is the practical application of anthropological theories, methods, and practices to the analysis and solution of practical problems. The term was first put forward by Daniel G. Brinton in his paper titled, "The Aims of Anthropology" and John Van Willengen simply defined applied anthropology as "anthropology put to use" Applied anthropology includes conducting research with a primary or tertiary purpose to solve real-world problems in areas such as public health, education, government, business, and more.

In Applied Anthropology: Domains of Application, Kedia and Van Willigen define the process as a "complex of related, research-based, instrumental methods which produce change or stability in specific cultural systems through the provision of data, initiation of direct action, and/or the formulation of policy". In other words, applied anthropology is the praxis-based side of anthropological research; it includes researcher involvement and activism within the participating community.

Spanning academic disciplines
The American Anthropological Association (AAA) website describes anthropology as a focus on "the study of humans, past and present. To understand the full sweep and complexity of cultures across all of human history, anthropology draws and builds upon knowledge from the social and biological sciences as well as the humanities and physical sciences." Thus, the field of anthropology encompasses four subareas: sociocultural anthropology, biological (or physical) anthropology, archaeology, and linguistic anthropology. Because a central tenet of the anthropological field is the application of shared knowledge and research about humans across the world, an anthropologist who specializes in any of these areas and enacts research into direct action and/or policy can be deemed an "applied anthropologist". In fact, some practical, real-world problems invoke all sub-disciplines of anthropological theory, method, and practice. For example, a Native American community development program may involve archaeological research to determine legitimacy of water rights claims, ethnography to assess the current and historical cultural characteristics of the community, linguistics to restore language competence among inhabitants, and medical anthropology to determine the causality of dietary deficiency diseases.

Professional engagement
Applied anthropologists often work for nonacademic clients, such as governments, development agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), tribal and ethnic associations, advocacy groups, social-service and educational agencies, and businesses. It is also not uncommon for an anthropologist to initiate activist work surrounding his or her own area of study; frequently, sociocultural anthropological studies begin as mere research inquiries that blossom into community advocacy projects, and even new specialized NGOs.

Methodology utilized in applied anthropology includes, but is not limited to, ethnography, participant observation, snowballing, interviews, and focus groups. Applied anthropologists also use textual analysis, surveying, archival research, and other empirical methods to inform policy or to market products.

Problems and criticisms
The process of conducting anthropological research and then applying knowledge in attempts to improve the lives of research participants can be problematic, and is often laced with elements of Orientalism and/or colonialism. Kedia and Van Willigen describe the moral dilemma embedded in this work: "The ethical requirements of applied anthropology are especially challenging since the practitioner must negotiate an intricate balance between the interests of the clients who commission the work, and those of the community being studied." The authors continue by stating that this negotiation leads to issues of privacy, ownership, and the implications and purposes of the study being produced (p. 16).

Although guidelines regarding ethicalities of applied anthropology are put forth by major anthropological organizations—including the American Anthropological Association (AAA), the Society for Applied Anthropology (SFAA), and the National Association for the Practice of Anthropology (NAPA)—it is increasingly difficult to ensure that the high volume of worldwide anthropologists proceed with their research in ways that are both culturally relative and sensitive to community needs. Kedia and Van Willigen describe the myriad roles an applied anthropologist must play as effective resource for communities in need; a researcher must be an advocate, cultural "broker", evaluator, policy researcher, public participation specialist, and research analyst.

There has also been some criticism of the interaction between applied anthropologists and government agencies, as those agencies may want to move forward with a development project while anthropologists restrict progress studying carefully before supporting the project.

Debates about objectivity/cultural relativity in anthropology
The field of anthropology is also fraught with debate surrounding accurate and effective approaches to conducting research. More specifically, there is continued debate about the essentiality of objectivity in anthropological fieldwork. Some hermeneutic scholars contend that it is impossible to remove one's own preconceived cultural notions from one's work. In this line of thought, it is more productive to recognize that anthropologists are themselves culturally programmed observers, and must always be wary of biases that influence information they receive. In contrast, the positivist approach to anthropology emphasizes the necessity for an objective, regimented, and scientific approach to anthropological research.

The multinational phenomenon of female genital cutting (FGC) exemplifies the necessity for an anthropologist to account for relative cultural contexts: "The work of scholars who stress the fundamental importance of offering perspectives on cultural factors that promote the practice of female genital cutting has brought the debate surrounding cultural relativism into sharp focus. Greunbaum (1996) notes that analyses that do offer emic interpretations and cultural contextualizations are often criticized as bordering on advocacy for the practice" [emphasis in original]. In these instances, it is imperative that an anthropologist not cloud his or her own preconceived notions about health and gender relations in an attempt to "remedy" a complex social issue.

Scholarly works and organizations
There are three primary groups based in the US that are founded on the application of anthropology with acute attention to ethics and social implications: American Anthropological Association (AAA), Society for Applied Anthropology (SFAA), and the National Association for the Practice of Anthropology (NAPA).

The premiere journal of applied anthropology in the United States is called Human Organization, published by the Society for Applied Anthropology. In the UK, the main journal for applied anthropology is called Anthropology in Action.

The Association of Social Anthropologists (ASA) has a network of Applied Anthropologists known as "Apply". Within the European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA), there is the Applied Anthropology Network, which annually organises the international symposium, Why the World Needs Anthropologists. The theme of the first symposium was New Fields for Applied Anthropology in Europe (Amsterdam, 2013), followed by; Coming Out of the Ivory Tower (Padua, 2014), Burning Issues of Our Hot Planet (Ljubljana, 2015), Humanise IT (Tartu, 2016), Powering the Planet (Durham, 2017), and Designing the Future (Lisbon, 2018). Within the EASA Medical Anthropology Network, there is also an applied anthropology special interest group.

Under the direction of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Jonathan Benthall (author of The Best of Anthropology Today) created the annual Lucy Mair Medal of Applied Anthropology. This recognizes excellence in using anthropology "for the relief of poverty or distress, or for the active recognition of human dignity".

title: Applied anthropology


text:
User talk:Fordman~enwiki

Hello Fordman, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
 * You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
 * You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the Community Portal.
 * You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
 * The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 02:06, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ant farm.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ant farm.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 08:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Scott Shriner.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Scott Shriner.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. No Guru 21:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Fordman. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Fordman~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 12:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fordman~enwiki


text:
User talk:Hyperneural

Fair use rationale for Image:Tribes2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tribes2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 15:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Greenacres.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Greenacres.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Ja Ga  talk 22:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  06:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hyperneural