text:
Talk:Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

USSR (now Russia)?
Thanks for reverting the changes "| condition_effective = Ratification by the Soviet Union," to "... Russia" and "| depositor =Governments of ... the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics" to "... Russian Federation".

Might it be appropriate to split the difference, e.g.: and
 * "| condition_effective = Ratification by the Soviet Union," > "| condition_effective = Ratification by the Soviet Union (now Russia)," or "... USSR (now Russia)," or
 * "| depositor =Governments of ... the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics" to "... Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (now Russian Federation)" or  "...  USSR (now Russian Federation)"?

This would make the text more accessible, I think, to people aren't old enough to remember when it was the Soviet Union. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 07:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

 * I do like your idea. When making the decision to approve or revoke the change I researched for a few minutes over at treaties.un.org to verify the nomenclature. I determined that the current form is accurate. I would agree with the the change you suggested along with utilizing the parties field in the Template:Infobox treaty template. This should increase the topic clarity. DavidDelaune (talk) 08:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

 * I'm confused: Since you have not already made that change, it suggest to me that while you like my idea, you aren't sure it's appropriate.  Unless you have a substantive reservation, I suggest this is a place for us to "Be bold" and make the change.  If someone else doesn't like it, they can revert it ;-)  I may make the change later myself if I feel moved to do so and haven't heard from you in the interim.  Thanks for your contributions to helping improve the education of the mass of humanity, which is what all the contributors to Wikimedia Foundation projects do except for seriously biased editors.  DavidMCEddy (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Seeing this discussion after making a similar "split the difference" edit. The Soviet Union needed to ratify, but Russia is now the successor and depositary.  But it's not accurate to say USSR (now Russia).  Russia is the treaty successor to the Soviet Union, but not identical.  It's not just a name change. NPguy (talk) 18:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Wonderful. This is effective, constructive anarchy ;-)  DavidMCEddy (talk) 18:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

What's "dubious"?
You reinstated a flag on the following:

 * Several high-ranking officials within the United Nations have said that they can do little to stop states using nuclear reactors to produce nuclear weapons.

What's "dubious" about this?

I do not have access to, so I cannot directly evaluate whether "Several high-ranking officials within the United Nations have said" what is claimed. However, I've "looked inside" the book on Amazon. It looks like a reasonable work of scholarship with substantive notes at the end of each chapter and a section on "weapons proliferation" in chapter '6. Political and social concerns: "Broken Plowshare"', which sounds to me like it could easily contain such a claim.

The book was deemed sufficiently notable to merit its own Wikipedia article, and the author "is an American academic who is director of the Danish Center for Energy Technology at the Department of Business Development and Technology and a professor of social sciences at Aarhus University ... [And] is editor-in-chief of Energy Research & Social Science", according to the Wikipedia article on him. The Wikipedia article mentions that the possession of nuclear reactors makes it much easier to get nuclear weapons, though United Nations is not mentioned in that Wikipedia article.

I found the other book,, in the Internet Archive. The page cited, 144, does NOT directly mention "Several high-ranking officials within the United Nations", but does initiate a discussion that includes a discussion of problems with the 2005 NPT Review Conference: 'The conference chairman described the event as "a failure."' (p. 145)

Do we really need a close analysis of Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power to support that exact verbiage?

??? Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 04:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 * If you have the book, would you mind adding a page citation to support your claim? Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 04:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 * DavidMCEddy: Access to Sovacool is through google books as I updated it on the book's Wikipedia page.
 * There were, and still are, two citations here, both with page numbers:
 * 7) Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power pages 187–190, and
 * 8) The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and its Proliferation, page 144.
 * Content from Wikipedia page: "Several high-ranking officials within the United Nations have said that they can do little to stop states using nuclear reactors to produce nuclear weapons."
 * From page 190 of Sovacool: "For these five reasons, a number of high-ranking officials, even within the United Nations, have argued that they can do little to stop states from using nuclear reactors to produce nuclear weapons."
 * The "five reasons" are discussed on the preceding pages: specifically 188-189 covers reasons 2-5, page 187 is excluded from the google books preview and I presume that covers the first reason. Grorp (talk) 07:32, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 * I flagged the citations as dubious because many of the factual claims based on the citation are either nonsensical or at best display a confused understanding of the facts. On this basis I concluded that either the source is not reliable or the quotes misrepresented the source.  The author (Sovacool) is not a recognized expert on nuclear nonproliferation.  I had not heard of him ten years ago and have not heard of him since.  His views might merit a passing mention, not the repeated use of a low quality source, as noted here.NPguy (talk) 22:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Bowing out since I am not sufficiently interested in this subject, and not motivated to read your decade-old spat. I was simply reading the page, saw the 'dubious' tag, located the sources through google, read the pages cited, saw that the citations matched the language on the page, and so I updated their links on the wiki pages and removed the tag. As for evaluating the quality of the citations, sounds like material for one of those noticeboards. Grorp (talk) 00:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree this is not dubious, based on the second source alone which had not been elaborated on in this discussion I am replying to. I expected the source to say the science behind a conversion from energy-producing uranium to weaponized uranium is difficult and theoretical, but the source simply states it is easily accomplished. One of the writers was a U.S. Secretary of the Air Force. Seems like he would know LightProof1995 (talk) 22:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * What second source? It's been a while and I don't know what you're referring to. NPguy (talk) 01:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

New map
The new map is OK, but makes a distinction that is not very important and potentially confusing, namely the distinction between states that ratified and those that acceded. It may be of slight historical interest, but there is no practical current difference. I recommend dropping this distinction, merging the light and dark blue, and merging the dark and light green. NPguy (talk) 22:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Inaccurate link re. "Ridding research reactors of highly enriched uranium to take decades longer than projected"
On 2022-06-30T02:17:33 User:GreenC bot replaced
 * URL https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/ridding-research-reactors-highly-enriched-uranium-take-decades-longer-projected
 * with https://www.science.org/content/article/ridding-research-reactors-highly-enriched-uranium-take-decades-longer-projected

in.

SADLY, neither of those URLs discuss highly enriched uranium (HUE).

Fortunately, I was able to find a copy of the article on the Internet Archive:. I've migrated the reference to Wikidata, where it's actually more complete (e.g., which "Adrian Cho"?) and more easily maintained. DavidMCEddy (talk) 04:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

 * The URL suggests an article about HEU, but the underlying article is about something completely different. It's so obviously wrong, it's probably a one-off error during the recent migration Science did from sciencemag.org to science.org. I will report it to them as I am currently volunteering to help them with this migration. Thanks for the notification. Hopefully this does not indicate a bigger problem with their redirects. --  Green  C  04:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

 * Thanks for your attention to this. It does look like it could be symptomatic of larger problems.  I'm glad you read my report ;-) DavidMCEddy (talk) 05:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks like in 2016 two different papers were assigned the same DOI number 10.1126/science.aae0287 which confused the new science.org site. I've never heard of duplicate DOIs before but here is a case. Still researching. -- Green  C  15:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @DavidMCEddy@GreenC Thank you for your patience while the team at science.org researched and resolved the DOI and URL conflict described here. The intended article has been restored with DOI 10.1126/science.aae0287 referencing the URL https://www.science.org/content/article/ridding-research-reactors-highly-enriched-uranium-take-decades-longer-projected. Meanwhile, the conflicting article has been issued a new DOI 10.1126/ade5025 and restored at the URL https://www.science.org/content/article/germanys-excellence-program-gets-good-grades. SibeliusHicks (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Review Conference, rescheduled from 2020 to 2022
The article currently has this sentence: "The 2015 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) was held at the United Nations in New York from 27 April to 22 May 2015" but there isn't anything on the next Review Conference. It was scheduled for 2020 but it is finally happening in 2022. Would someone please find one or more suitable sources and edit this article accordingly? Oaklandguy (talk) 04:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

 * How does this source look? (sorry, I'm rusty at turning this into a proper citation

Oaklandguy (talk) 04:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Ukraine
A section on Ukraine has been added. The section is problematic because it relies entirely on one article, which is mostly an opinion article, though couched as an academic paper. This paper is not representative of scholarship on the subject (Mariana Budjeryn an d Steve Pifer would be more reliable and balanced sources) and makes highly questionable assertions, most notably that Ukraine possessed the nuclear weapons that were deployed on its territory in 1994. NPguy (talk) 02:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Geology of the Bryce Canyon area

spelling?
Is "ampitheatures" a typo? Google give two hits, one of which is this article. Markalexander100 05:22, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

 * Yep. I fixed it. Thanks for the note. --mav 05:49, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Colorado Plateau(s)?
I believe the correct usage is "Colorado Plateau", not "Colorado Plateaus" as in the article, as it is one geographic feature. Anyone have examples of usage to the contrary? Gwimpey 17:06, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

 * As our Colorado Plateau article states, that North American province is composed of many plateaus. This is also the usage I found in the main reference work for this article, Geology of National Parks. But yes, common usage does prefer the singular and that is why I located the article on the subject at the singular title. But the common usage is strictly not correct and gives an incorrect image about what the region actually is. So there is no reason why we should be incorrect in the dispayed body text and section titles. --mav 03:04, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

utah
a mention of where bryce canyon is on this page would be nice.. i know you can click the link to the main page, but...

 * Done. --mav 03:39, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Automated Review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 21:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
 * There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
 * Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -  between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 4 feet, use 4 feet, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 4&nbsp;feet.[?]
 * Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.[?]
 * Per Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called  ==The Biography== , it should be changed to  ==Biography== .[?]
 * Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
 * Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “ All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
 * The script has spotted the following contractions: didn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

Nice article
Hadn't looked in for awhile. Very informative article. Good work! Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the compliment! :) --mav (reviews needed) 03:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geology of the Bryce Canyon area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070708205524/http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology//parks/brca/ to http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology/parks/brca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

FA concerns
I have reviewed this article as part of WP:URFA/2020 and I am concerned that it does not meet the featured article criteria anymore. I am concerned about multiple unsourced paragraphs (including the whole "Grand Staircase" section) and that none of the sources are pre-2007. Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Z1720 (talk) 18:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Claron Formation vs. Wasatch Formation
The statement that the Claron Formation was once named the Wasatch Formation seems off. The summaries at GEOLEX indicate that the Wasatch Formation is still a valid formation across the Colorado Plateau, and that the Claron Formation correlates with the Wasatch Formation. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Geology of the Bryce Canyon area


text:
Literati

Literati may refer to:
 * Intellectuals or those who love, read, and comment on literature
 * Intelligentsia, a status class of highly educated people who consciously shape society
 * The scholar-official or literati of imperial/medieval China
 * Qing literati
 * Literati painting, also known as the southern school of painting, developed by Chinese literati
 * The literati style of bonsai, consisting of thin, elegant trees in the calligraphic style of literati painting
 * Confucianism, known as the school of literati
 * The game Literati, a variant of Scrabble developed by Yahoo! Games
 * Literati (book club), children's book club

title: Literati


text:
User talk:ErikNY/Archive1

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
 * Read the article describing how to edit a page and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
 * When editing pages, use the preview button before submitting and try to fill in the summary box for every edit.
 * Eventually, read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck! Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~ (4 tildes).

E. D. Hill copyright
Hi there—I noticed that you'd taken out the biography and photo that I'd posted for E. D. Hill. I'm an employee of Mrs. Hill, and the bio and photo posted are the same bio and photo that FNC send out for publicity. That's why I used the "publicity" copyright tag. Is this still a problem?

RyanSEanes 16:37, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Bob Grant copyright
Hi,

I saw you pup a "copyvo" on the Bob Grant page. Why do you believe that the original page is copyrighted?

And also I changed, erased and added to the original article. I believe it is quite enough to make it different enough to avoid CR conflicts. Please try to look into it.

Thanks,

www.jpfo.org

Franziska Van Almsick
This redirects to a non-existent page. Are you planning on creating that page? If so, you should do so, otherwise the redir is likely to go away (redirs to non-existent pages get purged). Noel 17:14, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hi Eric. I fell for your redirect and re-redirected it, thinking your page had some content. Well, thanks to Eric I created a stub now for Franziska_Van_Almsick. If you have the time you could greatly extend that. Also I noticed there are people missing in the swimmers list linked from my stub. Happy Wikiing --doerfler 11:13, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

VfD: List of songs with brackets in their titles
I noticed you've contributed to this page in the past. It is now on Votes for Deletion. Would you consider taking part in the vote? Thanks. Dmn[[European Union| / Դմն ]] 00:21, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

WCBS Vandal
I sure wish I could block him. I'm not an admin, though I play one on TV. :^P However, I can list him on the vandalism in progress page. On my way. Oh, and thanks for the info! - Lucky 6.9 00:45, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

My pleasure. I used to work for an Infinity station and I know how protective they can be of their intellectual property. I've listed him on the Vandalism in progress page. - Lucky 6.9 00:52, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Copyright patrol
Hi Erik, thanks for the work on copyright violations patrol. I removed a couple of your copyvio tags (eg. Sts. Cosmas and Damian) and wanted to explain; The online Catholic Encyclopedia is copyrighted 1908, and is therefore PD. But the website claims a new copyright, 2003(not sure why). If people use material from the 1908 text in Wikipedia we consider it OK and use the  tag. --Duk 17:27, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Todd English
Hey, funny you should pick up on this. I was actually on the phone with his people telling them about my placing his info on Wikipedia. I guess I should have contacted them first, lol. How can we go about having them approve this article. I would really like to see it on Wikipedia - Nellynandes 13:36, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Re: NYC FM Template
Absolutely! I haven't lived in NYC for a while now, and I don't get to visit very often, so I couldn't remember which of the lesser known stations don't have proper signals or significant listenership in the city.Fredo 02:34, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Re: Jack FM format article
June 6, 2005 update In case you saw this already, I have deleted this update. I saw your comment on my idea and have moved my thoughts to the discussion. My apologies.User:hairymon.

Tony Bennett
FYI the expansion on Tony Bennett that you (rightly) requested has been done. Wasted Time R 16:44, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ronald20 ala "Broadcast Bandit"
I see what you mean regarding our "Broadcast Bandit." You think someone with an interest in the subject could do better. Can't these just be listed for speedy deletion under the "no content" criterion? Once a few of these nanostubs go away, perhaps he'll get the message. Finally, many thanks for the welcome. - Lucky 6.9 21:45, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * Right on both counts. I wonder if a request for comment is warranted?  I know this is an anon but the only contributions from this ISP are, well, these things.  If you go that route, let me know.  I'll be glad to support it.  Sorry to hear about Boothy. - Lucky 6.9 19:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * For more info on Ronald20, please see User:BlankVerse/RonaldWatch. Blank Verse   ∅  08:39, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Re: Richard Neer
Thanks for the heads-up. I've expanded the article. In general, DJs aren't getting their due on WP — in particular, Scott Muni really deserves an article. Wasted Time R 18:32, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

 * For the record Scott Muni is there now.   Wasted Time R 02:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Wikiproject
Hello ErikNY, I am personally inviting you to join the WikiProject Professional wrestling. All you do is add your name to the list of participants. If your interested, do so. Hope you join the project — M o e   ε  21:28, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

User:69.119.152.127
They're copyvios! !@#$ Now I have to go through and delete them all! This is a larger headache than I anticipated. Sasquatch ↔讲↔看 02:49, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

Matt Bourne and Jim Brunzell
Hi again, EricNY. I saw you put a copyvio these pages. Well, I created sub-pages for Matt Bourne and Jim Brunzell, so when the time comes, I created a proper article. Just thought I would let you know. — M o e   ε  23:29, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

PNC Bank Arts Center copyright
I Made a new "non-copyright infringing" part on the page's temp subpage

Sorry :/

Yuwen 02:43, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Re: so... do I edit over the copyright stamp thing? or will you do something about it? Yuwen 04:15, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Detroit AM template
Hi there...just curious what your source was for Template:Detroit AM. CHYR isn't an AM station anymore -- I wouldn't ordinarily worry about it, but in this case the station moved to FM in 1993. I'm actually curious to know what sources list an AM station that's been defunct for over a decade as still active. Bearcat 04:09, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Ah, okay. Good catch on CIDR, though. Windsor's also getting a rebroadcaster of Toronto's CJBC-FM (Espace Musique) this year (not sure of the exact date, but the license is a couple of years old), so I added that to the FM template as well. Oh, and the Michiguide media site doesn't have a coverage map for CHYR's FM transmitter, so I can't tell if the signal gets to Detroit or not (and hence whether it should be added to the FM template or not). But I may be going to visit a friend in Ann Arbor in the fall, so I'll have him tune his car radio to 96.3 to check (*grin*) Bearcat 04:22, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Actually, I think I will add CHYR to the Detroit FM template. A Google search for "CHYR Detroit" brings up 200+ hits (and not just historical references to the old AM signal, either), so I'd take that as evidence that it's known in the market. Bearcat 04:27, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

CSD
Please check WP:CSD, only articles which fulfil one of the criteria listed there are to be tagged for speedy deletion. Extremely obscure is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Thanks. --fvw *  14:15, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

Simpson's Episodes
Where are those Simpson's episode articles copyvio'ed from, you haven't tagged them or listed a URL?Gateman1997 22:27, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Live 8 DVD
The information posted on the Live 8 DVD page did NOT come from http://www.brain-damage.co.uk/news/0509063.html as reported, but came directly from a press release provided by EMI. Details of this document are avaiable for you to view at http://www.live8livedvd.com/. The information was provided by permission as EMI wants people to know of this release. The material is not copyrighted and is available to all in both text and pdf format.

2008 olympics..
lol, I really thought it didn't exist. But this is WikiPedia! Irdepesca572 20:02, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

WABC Logo
Hi I'm pretty sure it was you who said there was no point to having the WABC logo on it's page because it is already in the corner (If this wasn't you I apologize) Well, I put it there because the B&W pictures that are on the stations' pages don't depict the logos as they should.

KTTV
I might call KTTV Fox's West Coast flagship station, except with a steady diet of I Love Lucy, Cops, and M*A*S*H reruns, it's not much of a flagship. ;-) Blank Verse   ∅  02:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

KCBS-TV
The "Only five sentences is a stub!" plus the rest of that edit were copied and pasted from one of my edits where I had corrected his deletion of a stub template. Since he's now editing again from a LAUSD IP, I may try to contact the school district to see if I can find out more about him and maybe be able to contact one of his teachers. Blank Verse  ∅  22:18, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

WP:CP
Hey there. I see you making good catches on copyright problems quite often. Can I just ask you to use the new template:
 *  *ArticleName

when doing so? It provides all the links that the clearing admin needs, and makes the closure process less painful. Thanks! -Splash talk 21:38, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Andreas Johansson
Hi. I noticed you had tagged the original Andreas Johansson article with a copyvio tag, but I have gone ahead and created a temporary article here. Could you please remove the tag and replace the article? Thank you. Bobo192 | Edits 06:36, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

ErikNY said: Usually, it takes some time before a temporary article is transferred to the main article. That's simply the Wikipedia policy, and that's all that can happen right now.

Cool. Just letting you know it's there when the time comes to replace it. All the best. Bobo192 | Edits 17:09, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Re: New York City radio
Yeah, I work on the stations I listened to over the years. I just did a cleanup on WWRL 'cause I used to listen to that sometimes decades ago. Need to try and remember who the DJs were besides Frankie Crocker. As for K-Rock I never liked it so it's all yours! Be sure to mention The Greaseman. Wasted Time R 02:25, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Jack McKeon
Hello, I was wondering why my revisions of the Jack McKeon article were removed? I work for Dolphins Stadium and I spent a lot of time gathering that information to ad in there, since there was virtually nothing on him in Wikipedia. I cited my sources accurately, so why was it removed?

-PhoenixF2B

NBA Project
First of all, I would like to formally thank you for adding a comprehensive team history to the New York Knicks article, which was pretty bad before you came along :). Secondly, I want to invite you, or somehow coerce you, into joining the  WikiProject National Basketball Association.  Good help is hard to come by, especially with the Knicks ;). Cheers! King 17:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

moving articles
Be careful about moving articles by doing copy and paste moves; you lose the entire history. I'll try and make a request for a modertator to fix everything so that the article is at Black Entertainment Television where it belongs (not wit hthe "BET" affixed to the end), but with the entire article history there as well. --FuriousFreddy 02:03, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I've fixed it all, I think. Let me know if there's edit histories still missing anywhere. Freddy was right though, only restore pages using the move button, if that doesn't work, please contact an admin instead of pasting in the original content. - Mgm|(talk) 08:00, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Broadcast Bandit
I remember this monkey. Sheesh. Not much we can do short of blocking the AOL proxies for only fifteen minutes at a time. If the text is totally unsalvageable, they can be speedied. I don't have time today for much new pages patrolling, but I'll sure as heck keep an eye open. Thanks! - Lucky 6.9 19:04, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Blanking
Just to let you know that removing the content from a page does not delete it, it just leaves a blank page. The correct thing to do is to place the tag on the page and an admin will come along and delete it from the system. -- Francs2000 22:30, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Tagging articles for speedy deletion
To help us admins in saving us time, whenever you tag articles for speedy deletion because they are copyvio, please remember to also specify the web link URL from where it came from. Because we need to enter it into the deletion logs. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

 * And please also blank the infringing content from the page (for copyvios only). Sometimes articles hang around in CAT:CSD for a while before an administrator sees and deletes them; Lindsay Kemp lasted six and a half hours. —Cryptic (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

TV Market
Hi, I have noticed that in the past you have edited or created a template for a television DMA (market) in North America, or have edited an articles about television stations. Currently their are several different styles of the template being used. Because of this i have set up a workshop to obtain input on setting up a common configuration for these templates. Feel free to assist at WikiProject Television Stations/markets. Also while you are their, feel free to leave you name as a participant on the WikiProject Television Stations as well as any comments you might have, to help wikipedia improve articles on television stations. If you know some one else who has helped contribute to these templates or you think would like to help, please pass this mesage on to them. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 06:42, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

KTNC
Would you be able to supply a reason for the speedy deletion tag on KTNC please? Enochlau 01:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Renaming of stations from XXXX to XXXX-TV
I see you also questioned Davodd on his rename of a station from WXTV to WXTV-TV. Myself and another editor are looking for a place to talk about these changes. If you have any suggestions please post them to Talk:KTVX-TV. A 02:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Bears and Bears-Packers
At some point earlier today, I realized that much of the Bears-Packers article that someone had split out from the Bears article was apparently lifted from an NFL.com article which I had once linked to (or at least I think I did, not sure) in the original Bears writeup. The tipoff was when someone deleted the reference to the NFL.com article, apparently to hide their tracks. As I looked at it a bit, I realized that someone had ripped off a significant portion of it to build the Bears-Packers section. Although I added my own stuff to the Bears-Packers article before I realized that fact, which might muddy the waters, I recommend that someone with proper authority delete the Bears-Packers rivalry article altogether. Wahkeenah 15:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Looks like you did it already. Bravo. Wahkeenah 15:26, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Question
The Stadium and Uniform sections that I have added are not copied from any website. They are written by me with the proper references. I would like to know why you keep revising it to the old version. The new version is a better article.

WNBC-TV
I moved WNBC to WNBC-TV because that is the standard for broadcast stations. Please do not move it back. --CFIF 23:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

 * Not to but in to any discussion you may be having with user CFIF, but he and I have gone back and forth a few times on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations on this topic. Might I recommend that page as a venue for further disucssion. CFIF isn't the first person to take up the mission of renaming all TV station pages to -TV, and I don't think he will be the last, unless we get this hammered out on both the Naming_conventions page and the page of what seems to be the main Wikiproject for TV stations. A 23:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Transportation in NYC
Hello ErikNY I notice you've done work on the the Transportation in New York City article. It's really come along and has been nominated to be a US Collaboration of the Week. You shold vote for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:USCOTW Wv235

FYI
Re G4 Off Topic Forum, I've raised the issue on AN/I. See here. Jakew 22:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

The Simpsons Episodes: Sorted into Seasons
My apologies for my terrible English. Are all of the Simpsons Episodes Classified and sorted into their seasons? If they're not, should I sort them? Anonymous anonymous 10:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Broadcast Bandit strikes again?
Came across several edits to WFIL today, was wondering if you could take a look. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 04:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Sideshow Cinema
Good point. I have adjusted my vote to keep Debbie Rochon. If you have the chance, would you mind looking over the rest of the list again? I think you will find they are of a different caliber. --Grocer 19:36, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Eddieguerrero39.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eddieguerrero39.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Tawkerbot2 and the reversion of your edit(s)
Hello, ErikNY. You may have noticed User:Tawkerbot2 reverted one or more of your edits and perhaps left a message on your talk page. Wikipedia recently experienced a database malfunction, causing Tawkerbot2 to misidentify legitimate edits; hence the reversion of your edit(s) and the message. The bot has been temporarily disabled until the problems are rectified. Thanks. —Wayward Talk 18:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Andre09.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Andre09.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 17:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:April_hunter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:April_hunter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Moolah.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Moolah.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 20:47, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Z100
I apologize for having inserted the Z100 countdowns. Since I'm very passionate about the station and have collected them (and many playlists as well) over the years, I thought that it would have been a nice addition for those interested to trace the path of Z100's most popular music (and its ever-changing styles of music played) in the greater NYC area from its inception until present. I agree; after editing I thought that, at the very least, the visual aesthetic was a little irritating, but thought that if there was a lot of disagreement others could revise the page if so desired.

Incidentally, (and yeah, you probably figured this out :)) I'm brand new to the Wikipedia website and, apparently, am still a little ignorant to some of its policies. I did post a link to a website (of a colleague's, not my own website, and non station-affiliated) that contains both the yearly countdowns as well as about 10 years worth of playlists. If this violates any of Wikipedia's rules, or is unwarranted, please feel free to remove the link.  I also saw that you had re-edition my revision that had stated the countdown started on Christmas Eve (replacing with Christmas day).  I'm almost positive that it does, in fact, begin on Christmas Eve at noon; if not always, then I am 100% sure that at noon, on Christmas Eve 2005, I began to tape this year's countdown, it having finished while I was en route to a Christmas Eve party.  However, I'm not at all bothered should you remain adamant of your own certainty. Please edit the content as you see fit.

I'd really like to do my part on Wikipedia, and while I'm new, I'm sure I will have some bumps along the way. Thanks for all of your help - I really appreciate it! --Extremejtp 10:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Capitolisation
It's The Way I Type, Okay?

Frank0115932 20:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

BenH
I don't know why he keeps making these unneeded edits. I have reverted/changed some of his edits myself. I suggest we take this issue to WikiProject TV Stations. CoolKatt number 99999 04:36, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Lisa Marie Varon's marital status
That link you gave is dead. My friend who works for WWE says she is married, and while he's not exactly high-up he assume he knows. I know that the WWE likes to pretend all the divas spend their night pining away for a fat wrestling nerd (much like Backstreet Boys were supposed to hide their relationships), just look at how they mentioned Kidman got married but not to who, and how they never congratulated her for getting married. --TheTruthiness 03:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Goodbye
I have given up on Wikipedia after having a doppleganger account (see: FunkyChicken¡) and being insulted by ErikNY and accused of being a sockpuppet of someone who apparently pissed some people off and was driven away. Well I do not want to be dealing with such juvenile nonsense so I am being proactive and abandoning Wikipeida for good or at least until it has some sort of standards and control. Thank you and goodbye. FunkyChicken! 07:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:More Sockpuppets
Hi, thanks for that info. I actually came across those socks in response to WP:DRV, so I'd be interested to know which AfDs you were referring to. I found Articles for deletion/Jim Gardner, and the one on whichever 'TV station' it was. An anon (not you logged out?) provided some more suspected socks and, on investigation, I decided they were the same person and so I've indef blocked those, too. Some of them were a year old, but I figure there's no point letting them lie. (If you reply, could you do so on my talk, please, so that the anon can check in too. Thanks.) -Splash - tk 02:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I can imagine he's very frustrating, appearing in so many incarnations as he has done/does. I've cancelled that other AfD too, and I believe I've already blocked all the socks that were in it. Most of the 'editors' there were him! -Splash - tk 04:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

 * We are quite amused! We get innocent users banned forever and make you guys waste a lot of time. There are more, hundreds more just waiting to pounce. You will have to ban whole ranges of ips and hundreds of accounts, some created in libraries, stores, cafes, etc. We use accounts with non-static ip address connections. You'll wind up pissing off alot of people and your experiment will fail until you get some standards for editing! With love, The Wikipedia Vandalism Task Force. 201.250.214.91 05:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Oh, 70.108.73.24 is one of us, too! 201.250.214.91 05:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Did we mention unsecured wi-fi connections or wi-fi hot spots? Our laptops love them! Nothing like leeching off of unsuspecting neighbours! 201.250.214.91 05:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * And I forgot to mention that this is all to piss somebody off and wound up getting out of hand and quite fun. 201.250.214.91 05:54, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Our original goal was to fuck with someone who's website we didn't like and it spiraled from there. We'll stop, we promise. 201.250.214.91 05:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:ErikNY/Archive1


text:
Talk:Delayed sleep phase disorder

"social jet lag" redirect to this page
I understand the rationale for the redirect of "social jet lag" to this page, for parsimony. However, not all of what is explained here is true for social jet lag. I.e. this page would need a paragraph at least, in my opinion.

I've added a section on comorbidity sourced by a new study which is using the term social jet lag even its title (Chronotype, Social Jet Lag, and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Early Adolescence, JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(11):1049-1057. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3089). Here social jet lag was defined by actigraphy results and was treated as an exposure distinctly separate from chronotype.

Lastly, I'd like to alert folks to the fact that there is an article called cultural jet lag which to me reads like social jet lag. I added it to the "see also" section. May someone else pick up the discussion of a possible merger... --Wuerzele (talk) 11:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

 * Mixing social jet lag and delayed phase disorder seems to be a bit of an amalgame. Social jet lag "is a measure of misalignment between the individual’s schedule for work and their internal schedule" which presents as "shifts in their sleep between workdays and free days" . The authors of the concept define social jet lag more broadly as "a measure of circadian misalignment. Circadian misalignment is described as an abnormal phase angle difference between two or more rhythms, be they just internal or both internal and external", but the term "social" necessarily implies that one of those rhythms need to be socially defined. This can be exemplified with two counter-examples: 1) an individial with DSPD who has a night-shift work in phase with their circadian rhythm will still have a delayed sleep phase relatively to the day-night cycle, although they won't have any social jet lag nor chronic sleep deprivation; 2) an individual with a mixed chronotype (ie, non morning lark), which is the case of about 70% of the population (since morning larks represent about 30%) working at usual office hours will often display a social jet lag pattern with reduced sleep duration during the week and increased in the week-end. Hence, I think social jet lag should be dissociated from circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders. --85.27.2.10 (talk) 12:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

DSPD revisions
There is a great body of information here! But it certainly needs some editing. The prose is inconsistent, the implications of the phrasing is often at odds, and for an understudied syndrome without great deals of real evidence behind it, the article needs a winnowing down significantly. Lead is far too long, studies not up to date, =Management= section is outdated/unhelpful verging on potentially harmful.

Please advise if you are averse to a relatively dramatic editing to make this article more concise and useful to the wikipedia audience. Darkskysunflowers (talk) 08:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

 * No opposition after two weeks so I'm gonna edit, please give any feedback if you disagree with the edits. Darkskysunflowers (talk) 02:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Seriously this page is a mess, I did my best at fixing the lead but the rest is entirely too verbose and doesn't speak to the topic at hand. Darkskysunflowers (talk) 03:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Delayed sleep phase disorder


text: Template:Formula One teams

title: Template:Formula One teams


text:
Symphony No. 103 (Haydn)

Symphony No. 103 in E♭ major (H. 1/103) is the eleventh of the twelve London symphonies written by Joseph Haydn. This symphony is nicknamed The Drumroll after the long roll on the timpani with which it begins. It is from 1795, and his second-to-last symphony.

Composition and premiere
The symphony was the eleventh of twelve that were composed for performance in England during Haydn's two journeys there (1791–1792, 1794–1795), arranged and organized by the great impresario, Johann Peter Salomon. Haydn's music was well known in England well before the composer traveled there, and members of the British musical public had long expressed the wish that Haydn would visit. The composer's reception in England was in fact very enthusiastic, and the English visits were one of the most fruitful and happy periods of the composer's life. Haydn composed the "Drumroll" Symphony while living in London during the winter of 1794–1795.

It was premiered on March 2, 1795 as part of a concert series called the "Opera Concerts" at the King's Theatre. The orchestra was unusually large for the time, consisting of about 60 players. The task of directing the work was divided between the concertmaster, the violinist Giovanni Battista Viotti, and Haydn, who sat at a fortepiano. The premiere was evidently a success, and The Morning Chronicle ' s reviewer wrote:

"Another new Overture [i.e., symphony], by the fertile and enchanting Haydn, was performed; which, as usual, had continual strokes of genius, both in air and harmony. The Introduction excited deepest attention, the Allegro charmed, the Andante was encored, the Minuets, especially the trio, were playful and sweet, and the last movement was equal, if not superior to the preceding."

The Sun wrote:

"HAYDN's new Overture was much applauded. It is a fine mixture of grandeur and fancy... the second movement was encored."

Haydn later performed the work in Vienna, and for this purpose made a small cut in the final movement, which is usually respected by conductors today.

Since its premiere, the "Drumroll" Symphony has been a favorite among Haydn's symphonies, and it is frequently performed and recorded today. In 1831, Richard Wagner arranged it for piano.

The symphony takes about 30 minutes to perform.

Scoring
The work is scored for 2 flutes, 2 oboes, 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 2 horns, 2 trumpets, timpani, and strings.

Movements
The work is in standard four-movement form.

I. Adagio – Allegro con spirito
After the opening drum roll, the bass instruments play a somber opening theme:

 * [[Image:HaydnSymph103 1stMvtAdagio.GIF|528px]]

As commentators have pointed out, the first four notes of which match the Dies Irae chant, part of the Latin mass for the dead:

 * [[Image:Dies Irae.PNG|600px]]

H. C. Robbins Landon has remarked that at the start the theme is ambiguous between duple and triple time and between the keys of C minor and (what ultimately proves the case) E♭ major.

The sprightly Allegro con spirito that follows this introduction is in sonata form and time with an extended transition to the secondary theme. In a number of places, it restates the theme of the introduction in much faster tempo. Haydn restates part of the opening introduction in the coda, a formal procedure previously adopted by Mozart in his String Quintet K. 593 (1790). Beethoven was to do the same in his "Pathétique" piano sonata, published four years after the "Drumroll" Symphony in 1799.

II. Andante più tosto allegretto
In double variation form, with alternating themes in C minor and C major plus coda. The double variations had been a favorite musical form of the composer for about 20 years. Along with the Piano Trio H. XV:23 from the same year, this was the last set he wrote. The themes are said to have been developed by Haydn from Croatian folk songs he knew – for discussion, see Haydn and folk music. Some different features in this movement include a long violin solo, as well as the lack of clarinets.

III. Menuetto
The minuet is in the home key of E♭ major. Charles Rosen, in The Classical Style, chose this minuet to illustrate the point that Classical-era minuets often have very strong first beats, in contrast to the more flowing rhythm of the Baroque minuet.

IV. Finale: Allegro con spirito
The finale is in fast tempo, has a monothematic exposition, and is in sonata rondo form. Like the first movement, it begins with a quasi-ritual gesture – in this case, a horn call:

 * [[File:Horn fifths haydn.JPG]]

The horn call is followed by a pause, then repeated as accompaniment to the main theme, and indeed echoed throughout the movement.

Like the themes of the second movement, the opening melody was claimed by Franjo Kuhač to be taken by Haydn from Croatian folk song, in this case a tune called "Divojčica potok gazi" ("A little girl treads on a brook").

Robbins Landon notes that this finale is one of the longest in the London Symphonies. He calls it "one of the great tours-de-force, formally speaking, of Haydn's career: the creation of a long movement on a single theme in which our interest never flags; on the contrary, it is a Finale of unusual tension and strength."

Rather unusually for Haydn, he altered the fourth movement after it was completed, removing 13 bars fairly close to the end. The original autograph score preserves this music; it modulates to the key of C♭ major and includes a two-measure rest; with the dynamic markings and. Robbins Landon suggests that Haydn removed the passage because it "would hold up the course of the movement." The symphony is occasionally performed with the deleted passage included; e.g. in recorded versions by Antal Doráti and Frans Brüggen.

title: Symphony No. 103 (Haydn)


text:
Kevin Mitchell

Kevin Mitchell may refer to:

Sports

 * Kevin Mitchell (Australian rules footballer) (born 1945), Australian footballer
 * Kevin Mitchell (baseball) (born 1962), American baseball player and 1989 National League MVP
 * Kevin Mitchell (boxer) (born 1984), English boxer
 * Kevin Mitchell (ice hockey) (born 1980), American professional ice hockey player
 * Kevin Mitchell (linebacker) (1971–2007), NFL football player
 * Kevin Mitchell (motorcyclist) (born 1961), former British Grand Prix motorcycle road racer
 * Kevin Mitchell (safety) (born 1985), currently a free agent in the National Football League
 * Kevin Mitchell (water polo) (born 1981), Canadian water polo player

Other

 * Kevin Mitchell (musician), lead singer of Australian rock band Jebediah, also known as Bob Evans

title: Kevin Mitchell


text:
Rotuman

Rotuman may refer to:
 * anything related to the island of Rotuma, Fiji
 * Rotuman people, from the island of Rotuma
 * Rotuman language, their Austronesian language

title: Rotuman