text:
User talk:Curtsurly

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
 * Read the article describing how to edit a page and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
 * When editing pages, use the preview button before submitting and try to fill in the summary box for every edit.
 * Eventually, read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck! Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~ (4 tildes).

Image:NicoIcon.JPG
Why did you upload, and then immediately list for deletion, the above image? Also, what is its copyright status? — David Remahl 01:16, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Please respond. Now you have also uploaded Image:Nicoheroine.JPG. — David Remahl 01:30, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Add to that: ]Image:Nicoheroin.JPG. What are you doing? None of the images have been added to articles. This is starting to look like vandalism. Please stop / explain what you're doing, or the pictures may be deleted. You may be temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. — David Remahl 01:47, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging the image with fairuse. You should use it in an article too, if you want to argue fair use. — David Remahl 01:53, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I can assure you it isn't vandalism. My intent was to add an image to Nico's Wikipedia page. I am wary of using images on line because of copyrights. I admit, I don't really understand copyright at this time. Nevertheless, I assumed, perhaps, erroneously, that I could scan an image of Nico from the CD, The Marble Index. When I uploaded it, it looked shoddy and I wanted to replace it. Instead of uploading a cleaner image, I listed it for deletion. Then, I cleaned up the image and uploaded it under a different name. All but the current image on the Nico page need to be deleted. There is, obviously, only one that is attached to a page.

I have learned how to navigate this more effectively. What I need to know is precisely how to legally secure the images for album covers, personalities, historical events that I need to improve my postings. I don't understand the extant explanations of the copyright laws as applicable to images and text on Wikipedia.

Finally, I uploaded an image of Boyd Rice for his site. The image is copyrighted to his web site. I emailed them and was informed by the man I spoke with that he could not personally give me permission. He did give me the name of the photographer, but nothing came up in a google search. I read that images of notable personalities (and I argue that Boyd Rice qualifies) fall under fairuse. I didn't know what else to do, so I left it as "unknown".

So, again, how do I safely copyright images from the web, as well as my own personal files? Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for your help,

Curtsurly 10:45, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)Curtsurly

--Everett Jensen

Mishima photo
Please take a look at the Talk page for Yukio Mishima, I've warned you about the photo you put in that article. Crculver 18:33, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Category:Archivists
I believe archivist generally has a scholarly connotation and is an actual occupation (e.g. Stella Rimington). Judging from the people you've put in this category I gather you are thinking of something else. It's not obvious to me that this category follows the recommendations at categorization of people - on the other hand, it's not obvious that it doesn't. If you've read this page and think the category you're creating fits the recommendations how about renaming it somehow (renaming categories is kind of pain - it's basically create a new one and delete the old one)? Categories are in general meant to form a connected graph, so when creating categories please make an effort to put the new category in one or more higher level categories. All people categories should fit in someplace below category:people. -- Rick Block 04:00, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Category:Unpop Archivists
Hey, thanks for pointing that out. I started the Unpop Archivists page and simply gutted the first page of data. Then, I linked the Unpop category to the regular old Archivist category. Now, it is just up the the rest of the Wikiworld to add Archivists to the category. The new category is for the Unpop  and their direct antecedents.

I recognize that the popular definitions of "archivist" relate the utility of the position in a professional setting where one is "in charge" of the archives and is allowed to structure them in accordance with a strict set of guidelines. Unpop archivists merely collect and structure data that most folks just don't seem to have much use for in accordance with their own will and fancy. Again, I would have never hit on the idea if you hadn't of pointed out the error of me ways.

Curtsurly 06:17, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

see also: Unpop Art Movement

 * Would Category:Unpop Archivists fit as a subcategory of Category:Art movements? -- Rick Block 14:16, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

-

Great Idea, Presumably
Sure, but I'm just creating a holding cell for various individuals who aren't necessarily part of any "movement". I will go ahead and include Unpop under the category you suggested, but I'm more interested in collecting folks who stand out for their audacious cuteness or cute audacity. The label "Unpop Archivist" might cause confusion because it isn't obvious at cursory glance just what it is. Even a look at the list is momentarily baffling. To me, a list of "the unpop" seems silly. There is no unpop movement. However, there are individuals who are independantly manufacturing hilarity out of readymade emotional states such as fear, lethargy and revulsion.

I agree that the list should probably have a conventional home. Your suggestion sounds shockingly sensible. It just goes against all the secret codes informing my DNA to follow Convention on her skidding, doomed course into oblivion. But, I will do everything I can to ensure that Unpop is legitimately Wikified and viable for the hopelessly Pop or Anti-Pop to find themselves in.

Curtsurly 06:58, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)

-

Current 93
Hi Curtsurly, thanks for your edits (adding table and more) on the Current 93 page, I appreciate it. :) --Demonslave 01:44, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

G.O.B.
I don't appreciate your overlaying my valid additions. If you want to INCORPORATE your new material, that's fine, but deleting what I added is unacceptable. RickK 20:52, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)

It is Wikipedia standard policy to include the term "fictional character" in the first sentence of all fictional character articles. Please revert your deletions of my additions. RickK 20:39, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Arcade Fire
--How can you claim the Arcade Fire's Funeral was "fairly well received" when metacritic posts it as one of the highest-rated albums of 2004? Clearly, the vast majority of critics acclaimed it. --Jleon 15:48, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I changed it from "glowing" (not particularly NPOV) to "fairly good" and obviously erred on the side of modesty. Critical acclaim is subjective and has no bearing on the group's existence as an entity. I should have done away with it altogether. Curtsurly 04:59, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Fiery_knight.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Fiery_knight.JPG. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you. --Kevin McManus 21:30, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

cut and paste moves
Please do not move an article by copying its content into another article with the same name. This loses the revision history of the original article. I just spotted you doing this with Dickie Kerr / Dicky Kerr and undid the damage. Please use the "move" feature in the future when renaming an article. Kelly Martin 18:54, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Everett and Fiends 3.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Everett and Fiends 3.JPG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use of photo "Fiery Knight"
Hi. "Fair use" does not apply to User: space, see Fair use. What this means is that you cannot have an image on your userpage that is tagged as "fair use". I'm removing it. If you would like to decorate your userpage, please only use images in the public domain or under a free liscense. Thanks. Jkelly 22:37, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Jack Kevorkian
Good job cleaning up the Kevorkian page! —Morning star 08:04, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

JNR Copyright
I don't know if this has been brought to your attention but some material from Jay Robert Nash's works were copied directly into WP see : Wikipedia Signpost/2006-04-24/Jay Robert Nash. I have seen that you've used some of his material for reference in WP, and since his books aren't accurate, it would be nice to double check your entries so that WP doesn't get sued about fake entries that were entered by users. In no way am I accusing you, if this doesn't touch you in any way please forget I ever mentioned this or help me try to erase fake entries and copyright edits. Lincher 02:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I am in no way an expert in organized crime subjects but entries should be double-checked. If you didn't litterally copy the info than WP is ok or it means it wasn't you who added the fake entries and we have to dig a little deeper. Maybe ask MadMax to help you in this. Lincher 01:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Crispin Glover
Thanks for adding the filmbox! —Morning star 04:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Ann Beddingfield
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. The article was a non-notable biography according to the criteria set out in WP:BIO.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  21:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Leone Bouvier
I have added a "" template to the article Leone Bouvier, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pascal.Tesson 02:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Look For the Woman
This article has been deleted as a blatant copyright violation. It is not permissible to simply list the contents of a reference work in this manner. If you have created other articles of this type, please let an admin know promptly so that they can be deleted as well.

Please do not do this again.--Jimbo Wales 21:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Music of the Near East
I've added the "prod" template to the article Music of the Near East, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Music of the Near East. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Pascal.Tesson 20:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Willard-photo 09 hires.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Willard-photo 09 hires.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Phoenix Hacker 02:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Film Music
G'day,

Just letting you know, there is a new WikiProject up and running; WikiProject Film Music.

Alexbonaro 08:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Mukherji.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mukherji.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 19:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:SERVANTLOSEYBOGARDE.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SERVANTLOSEYBOGARDE.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — M o e   ε  22:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:JacksonYorkPosterMaids.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:JacksonYorkPosterMaids.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — M o e   ε  22:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

David E. Williams
A "" template has been added to the article David E. Williams, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.130.56.55 15:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:GOBwithaJOB.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GOBwithaJOB.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 02:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:HenrythefonzZuckerkorn.JPG
I have tagged Image:HenrythefonzZuckerkorn.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:SurelyMaebyPerhapsnot.JPG
I have tagged Image:SurelyMaebyPerhapsnot.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:WhichOneisDorothyGeorgeMichael.JPG
I have tagged Image:WhichOneisDorothyGeorgeMichael.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:KittyWantsGOBbad.JPG
I have tagged Image:KittyWantsGOBbad.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:STUCKBYWHITEPOWERBILL.JPG
I have tagged Image:STUCKBYWHITEPOWERBILL.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:LucilleHighballinAlone.JPG
I have tagged Image:LucilleHighballinAlone.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:CurseofBlueManMichael.JPG
I have tagged Image:CurseofBlueManMichael.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:MaggieLiesherassoff.JPG
I have tagged Image:MaggieLiesherassoff.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:GeorgeMichaelBluthYikes.JPG
I have tagged Image:GeorgeMichaelBluthYikes.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:CarlWeathersGetshisSTEWOn.JPG
I have tagged Image:CarlWeathersGetshisSTEWOn.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:MaebytheElephantBroach.JPG
I have tagged Image:MaebytheElephantBroach.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:WifeandGOBfreewheelin.JPG
I have tagged Image:WifeandGOBfreewheelin.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 02:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:JacksonYorkPosterMaids.JPG
I have tagged Image:JacksonYorkPosterMaids.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  19:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Mukherji.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mukherji.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Image:FPYIMPERIUM.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Image:FPYIMPERIUM.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Where the heart is.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Where the heart is.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Picture of Nico
Hi Curtsurly! Thanks for uploading an image of the beautiful Nico! However, I am skeptical about whether it falls under fair use or not. Are you sure that it's from the Marble Index inlay? If so, the image likely falls under non-free promotional. If not, we might still be able to put it under fair-use, but I'm not sure. - Face 14:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Twister 1989 film.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Twister 1989 film.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heavenlysphere01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Heavenlysphere01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Misanthropy Boyd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Misanthropy Boyd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HighSchooUSA.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HighSchooUSA.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MyTutor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MyTutor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Softcell.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Softcell.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SERVANTLOSEYBOGARDE.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SERVANTLOSEYBOGARDE.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AuntMarthaDoesThings.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:AuntMarthaDoesThings.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BusterFearSheep.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:BusterFearSheep.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Ayn Rand
Anyn Rand was a retard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.237.17.15 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Arrested Development Taskforce Invite
Hey there. I couldn't help noticing that you appear to be interested in Arrested Development. I am interested in setting up a Arrested Development Taskforce to improve articles related to Arrested Development. At the moment I am just looking for people who are interested in joining. If you are interested in joining, please add your name here or contact me on my talk page. Thankyou, Joelster (talk) 23:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mukherji.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mukherji.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HenrythefonzZuckerkorn.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:HenrythefonzZuckerkorn.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KittyWantsGOBbad.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:KittyWantsGOBbad.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:STUCKBYWHITEPOWERBILL.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:STUCKBYWHITEPOWERBILL.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MaggieLiesherassoff.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:MaggieLiesherassoff.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CarlWeathersGetshisSTEWOn.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:CarlWeathersGetshisSTEWOn.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WifeandGOBfreewheelin.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:WifeandGOBfreewheelin.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of male film actors (L-Z)
I have nominated List of male film actors (L-Z), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of male film actors (L-Z). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — TAnthonyTalk 02:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:HenrythefonzZuckerkorn.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:HenrythefonzZuckerkorn.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ronnie Dobbs
I have nominated Ronnie Dobbs, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ronnie Dobbs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thee Swank Bastards
A tag has been placed on Thee Swank Bastards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Ian Brady
I have nominated Ian Brady, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ian Brady. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Malleus Fatuorum 21:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Love and Hate (book)

The article Love and Hate (book) has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * doesn't assert notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. meco (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Curtsurly! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Douglas P. -

Replaceable fair use File:FPYIMPERIUM.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:FPYIMPERIUM.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 07:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dreamer of the Day

The article Dreamer of the Day has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * can't find any reviews from notable publications, or any other reliable sources discussing this book.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prezbo (talk) 04:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mr. Show
Template:Mr. Show has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Occult: A History for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Occult: A History is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Occult: A History until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Solinvictuslextalionis.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:Solinvictuslextalionis.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swastikas for Noddy

The article Swastikas for Noddy has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * NN album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 02:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Nico's Last Concert: Fata Morgana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nico's Last Concert: Fata Morgana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico's Last Concert: Fata Morgana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FamblyCat94 (talk) 00:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NICOMARBLEINDEX.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:NICOMARBLEINDEX.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of I Never Told Anyone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Never Told Anyone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/I Never Told Anyone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:GOBwithaJOB.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:GOBwithaJOB.JPG. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Plastics (South African band)

A tag has been placed on The Plastics (South African band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Death in June / Current 93 / Sol Invictus

The article Death in June / Current 93 / Sol Invictus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NMUSIC, no significant coverage or other evidence of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lennart97 (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dream City Film Club

The article Dream City Film Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Fails notability criteria of WP:MUSIC. Not the subject of serious independent, non-trivial coverage. No charting singles/albums. Very little coverage. Album release on a very niche indie label. Fairly niche and obscure band - fails notability requirements."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FirefoxLSD (talk) 22:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

"The Grandmother (movie)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Grandmother (movie). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Dream City Film Club for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dream City Film Club, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Dream City Film Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Softcell.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Softcell.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Apocalyptic folk albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Apocalyptic folk albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Curtsurly


text:
TI-82

The TI-82 is a graphing calculator made by Texas Instruments. The TI-82 was designed in 1993 as a stripped down, more user friendly version of the TI-85, and as a replacement for the TI-81. It was the direct predecessor of the TI-83. It shares with the TI-85 a 6 MHz Zilog Z80 microprocessor. Like the TI-81, the TI-82 features a 96×64 pixel display, and the core feature set of the TI-81 with many new features.

Features
The TI-82 is powered by the same processor that powered its cousin, the TI-85, a 6 MHz Zilog Z80 microprocessor. This was an improvement over the TI-81's 2 MHz Z80 processor. In addition, the available RAM was increased more than tenfold – from 2400 bytes to 28734 bytes (slightly more than the TI-85).

Some of the more notable improvements of the TI-82 over the TI-81 include the following: the addition of a link port to enable programs and other data to be transferred between two calculators or between a calculator and a computer; the addition of two new graphing types – polar and sequence, the addition of a new type of data – the list, the expansion of the size limit of matrices to 50×50, and the (unintentional) addition of the ability to program the calculator in assembly language. The last of these provided a significant boost in interest in the programmability of the calculator, as the use of assembly language (as opposed to Texas Instruments' own TI-BASIC) enabled significantly more performance and flexibility with the programs able to be used on the calculator.

Carried over from the TI-81 is the TI-82's power source – four AAA batteries and one CR1616 or CR1620 lithium backup battery (to ensure programs stored in RAM persist when the AAA batteries are being changed).

Design changes
The TI-82 was redesigned twice, first in 1999 and again in 2001. The 1999 redesign introduced a design very similar to the TI-73, TI-83 Plus, and the TI-89. It introduced a more contoured body and eliminated the sloped screen that has been common on TI graphing calculators since the TI-81. The 2001 redesign (nicknamed the TI-82 "Parcus") introduced a slightly different shape to the calculator, eliminated the glossy screen border, and reduced cost by streamlining the printed circuit board to four units.

TI-82 STATS
An enhanced version of the TI-82, the TI-82 STATS, was first released in 2004 in Europe. There are several improvements, most notably the statistical features as the name would suggest. In addition, it featured numerical differentiation and integration, together with complex numbers, financial functions and other improvements. In specification terms, it is virtually identical to the TI-83.

Technical specifications

 * CPU
 * Zilog Z80 CPU, 6 MHz

 * RAM
 * 32 KB, 28734 bytes user-accessible

 * OTP-ROM
 * 128 KB non-upgradable

 * Display
 * Text: 8 Rows × 16 characters
 * Graphics: 96×64 pixels, monochrome

 * I/O
 * Serial link port

 * Power
 * 4 AAA batteries plus 1 CR1616/CR1620 lithium battery for backup

 * Integrated programming languages
 * TI-BASIC, Assembly (via an undocumented feature)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: TI-82


text:
TI-81

The TI-81 was the first graphing calculator made by Texas Instruments. It was designed in 1990 for use in algebra and precalculus courses. Since its release, it has been superseded by a series of newer calculators: the TI-85, TI-82, TI-83, TI-86, TI-83 Plus, TI-83 Plus Silver Edition, TI-84 Plus, TI-84 Plus Silver Edition, TI-84 Plus C Silver Edition, TI-Nspire, TI-Nspire CAS, TI-84 Plus CE, and most recently, the TI-84 Plus CE Python. Most of them share the original feature set and 96×64-pixel display that began with this calculator, with the exceptions of the TI-84 Plus C Silver Edition and the TI-84 Plus CE family.

Features
The TI-81 is powered by a Zilog Z80 microprocessor, like those used in almost every other Texas Instruments graphing calculator (except the TI-80, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, TI-92, TI-92 Plus, Voyage 200 and TI-Nspire series). However, the processor is clocked at 2 MHz whereas the other Z80-powered Texas Instruments calculators run at speeds of at least 6 MHz (the TI-83 Plus Silver Edition, TI-84 Plus, and TI-84 Plus Silver Edition can run at 15 MHz). It contains 2400 bytes of user RAM, with additional RAM used internally by the calculator firmware software system.

The TI-81's user interactions are provided by its so-called Equation Operation System. This is comparable to the interface provided by the more recent TI-82, TI-83, and so on. This system is capable of such tasks as two-dimensional parametric graphing (in addition to standard two-dimensional function graphing), trigonometric calculations in units of either degrees or radians, simple drawing capabilities, creation and manipulation of matrices up to 6x6 in size, and programming in a proprietary statement-based language.

In late 2009 an exploit was found that can be used to execute machine code on the TI-81, using manual input of code. The TI-81 has no data link interface; its only means of input and output are the keyboard and screen.

As with its successors, the TI-81 is powered by four AAA batteries and one CR1616 or CR1620 lithium backup battery (to ensure programs are persistent when the AAA batteries are being changed). Some early TI-81 units omit the backup battery; if the AAA batteries of one of these units are changed one at a time and quickly, the memory contents are still retained.

Texas Instruments distributes software which emulates the TI-81 and its Equation Operating System on a desktop computer using DOS or DOSBox.

title: TI-81


text:
User talk:Notalent

November 2008
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Copana2002 (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * As you can see in this online scanning of The Bone People, not only is the title capitalised on the cover, but Keri Hulme capitalises it in her preface. . If you can find a reliable source that shows that the title should indeed not be capitalised feel free to change it, but it must meet the Wikipedia standards of verifiability. Copana2002 (talk) 04:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Little Creatures
"Lion Nathan has a 40% holding." - How sad. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Them's the breaks. Notalent (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Notalent! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Tom Larkin -

Conflict over Fleur Revell
Hi, Notalent. I see you've had some trouble lately over this article. I don't know who's right and who's wrong, and I don't doubt in the least that your intentions are good, but no one is using the talk page to try to work out the dispute. It's quite clear that all parties are in violation of our policies against edit warring. If you feel there's damaging information being added to the article without reliable, verifiable sources to support that, it would be appropriate to post a complaint to the biographies of living persons notice board. If you don't do that, please try to work out the dispute amicably on the article's talk/discussion page; failing to do that, and just continuing to revert changes puts you at risk for sanctions for edit warring. I mean no disrespect, of course, I just felt you should be informed of this information in case you weren't already aware of it. I've put an identical notice on the other party's talk page, as well. Best, –  OhioStandard  (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of As Far as a Life Goes

The article As Far as a Life Goes has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * album with no claim of notability. unreferenced since 2007

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:16, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anyone Can Say Goodbye

The article Anyone Can Say Goodbye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NMUSIC, no substantive coverage by independent and reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pushover (EP)

The article Pushover (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "No references at all that I can find; appears to be unnotable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. | Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 15:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

title: User talk:Notalent


text:
TI-80

The TI-80 is a graphing calculator designed by Texas Instruments in 1995 to be used at a middle school level (grades 6-8).

The TI-80 featured a 48 x 64 dot-matrix display with a 5 x 3 pixel font, the smallest screen of any TI graphing calculator. It had the slowest processor (980 kHz) of any TI graphing calculator. The first revision of the TI-80 'A' contained a proprietary Toshiba T6M53 ASIC while subsequent revisions contained a Toshiba T6M53A. Additionally, the TI-80 had the processor on board the ASIC, unlike later calculators like the TI-83, TI-83 Plus, and TI-84 Plus which had separate ASIC and processor chips in certain models. In comparison, the TI-81, released in 1990, featured a 2 MHz Zilog Z80 processor. However, the TI-80 did feature 7 KB of RAM (compared with the TI-81's 2.4 KB). The TI-80 also had more built-in functions than the TI-81 (such as list and table functions, as well as fraction and decimal conversions). Like the TI-81, the TI-80 did not feature a link port on the base model, however, unlike the TI-81, the ViewScreen variant (meant for use with TI's overhead projection units) did. The TI-80 was the only graphing calculator to use 2 CR2032 lithium batteries (instead of the standard 4 AAA batteries with a lithium backup battery).

Since its release, it has been superseded by the superior TI-73 and TI-73 Explorer. The TI-80 was officially discontinued in 1998, when it was replaced by the TI-73, however, production continued until at least October 2000.

title: TI-80


text:
Kristine Kathryn Rusch

Kristine Kathryn Rusch (born June 4, 1960 ) is an American writer and editor. She writes under various pseudonyms in multiple genres, including science fiction, fantasy, mystery, romance, and mainstream.

Rusch won the Hugo Award for Best Novelette in 2001 for her story "Millennium Babies" and the 2003 Endeavour Award for The Disappeared 2002. Her story "Recovering Apollo 8" won the Sidewise Award for Alternate History (short form) in 2008. Her novel The Enemy Within won the Sidewise (long form) in 2015. She is married to fellow writer Dean Wesley Smith; they have collaborated on several works.

She edited The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction for six years, from mid-1991 through mid-1997, winning one Hugo Award as Best Professional Editor. Rusch and Smith operated Pulphouse Publishing for many years and edited the original (hardback) incarnation of Pulphouse Magazine; they won a World Fantasy Award in 1989.

Beginning in July 2010, Rusch had a regular column in the bi-monthly The Grantville Gazettes e-zine called Notes from The Buffer Zone until the magazine's demise in August 2022.

Rusch became a Writer Judge for the Writers of the Future contest in 2010.

The Diving Universe
Novels:
 * Diving into the Wreck, Pyr Books, 2009, ISBN 978-1591027867
 * City of Ruins, Pyr Books, 2011, ISBN 978-1616143695
 * Boneyards, Pyr Books, January 2012, ISBN 978-1616145439
 * Skirmishes, WMG Publishing, September 2013, ISBN 978-0615795249
 * The Falls, WMG Publishing 2016, ISBN 978-1561467686
 * The Runabout, Asimov's cover story May/June 2017, WMG Publishing 2017, ISBN 978-1561467945
 * The Renegat, WMG Publishing 2019, ISBN 978-1561460908
 * Squishy's Teams, WMG Publishing 2020, ISBN 978-1561463596
 * Thieves, WMG Publishing 2021, ISBN 978-1561463718

Novellas:
 * Diving into the Wreck, Asimov's cover story, December 2005
 * Room of Lost Souls, Asimov's cover story, April/May 2008
 * The Spires of Denon, Asimov's cover story, April/May 2009; WMG Publishing 2019, ISBN 978-1561462995
 * Becoming One with the Ghosts, Asimov's, October/November 2010
 * Becalmed, Asimov's, April/May 2011, ISBN 978-0615811185
 * Stealth, Asimov's, October/November 2011
 * Strangers at the Room of Lost Souls, WMG Publishing, 2013
 * Dix, Asimov's cover story March/April 2018
 * Joyride, Asimov's, November/December 2018
 * The Death Hole Bunker, Asimov's, July/August 2023

The Fey

 * Vol. 1: The Sacrifice, 1995 (Illustrated by David O'Connor (illustrator), Dawn Wilson in 1996, and Albin Egger-Lienz in 2001)
 * Vol. 2: The Changeling, 1996 (Illustrated by Anne Yvonne Gilbert)
 * Vol. 3: The Rival, 1997 (Illustrated by Anne Yvonne Gilbert)
 * Vol. 4: The Resistance, 1998 (Illustrated by Anne Yvonne Gilbert)
 * Vol. 5: Victory, 1998 (Illustrated by Anne Yvonne Gilbert)

Black Throne

 * Vol. 1: The Black Queen, 1999
 * Vol. 2: The Black King, 2000

Retrieval Artist

 * Vol. 1: The Disappeared, 2002
 * Vol. 2: Extremes, 2003
 * Vol. 3: Consequences, 2004
 * Vol. 4: Buried Deep, 2005
 * Vol. 5: Paloma, 2006
 * Vol. 6: Recovery Man, 2007
 * Vol. 7: Duplicate Effort, 2009
 * Vol. 8: Anniversary Day: Anniversary Day Saga, Book 1, 2011
 * Vol. 9: Blowback: Anniversary Day Saga, Book 2, 2012
 * Vol. 10: A Murder of Clones: Anniversary Day Saga, Book 3, 2015
 * Vol. 11: Search & Recovery: Anniversary Day Saga, Book 4, 2015
 * Vol. 12: The Peyti Crisis: Anniversary Day Saga, Book 5, 2015
 * Vol. 13: Vigilantes: Anniversary Day Saga, Book 6 , 2015
 * Vol. 14: Starbase Human: Anniversary Day Saga, Book 7, 2015
 * Vol. 15: Masterminds: Anniversary Day Saga, Book 8, 2015

Star Wars

 * The New Rebellion, 1996

Stand-alone novels

 * The Gallery of His Dreams, 1991
 * The White Mists of Power, 1991
 * Heart Readers, 1993
 * Façade, 1993
 * Traitors, 1993
 * Alien Influences, 1994
 * Sins of the Blood, 1994
 * The Devil's Churn, 1996
 * Fantasy Life, 2003
 * The Tower, 2013
 * The Enemy Within, 2014

Short fiction

 * Collections
 * Stained Black, 1992
 * Stories for an Enchanted Afternoon, 2001
 * Little Miracles and Other Tales, 2001
 * The Retrieval Artist and Other Stories, 2002
 * Recovering Apollo 8 and Other Stories, 2010

Works as Kris Rusch
Kristine Kathryn Rusch has written one mainstream novel as "Kris Rusch".

 * Hitler's Angel, 1998

Works as Kris Nelscott
Kristine Kathryn Rusch writes mystery novels using the pen-name "Kris Nelscott", featuring Smokey Dalton, an African-American unlicensed private investigator, in Memphis, Tennessee.

Smokey Dalton

 * Vol. 1: A Dangerous Road, 2000
 * Vol. 2: Smoke-Filled Rooms, 2001
 * Vol. 3: Thin Walls, 2002
 * Vol. 4: Stone Cribs, 2004
 * Vol. 5: War at Home, 2005
 * Vol. 6: Days of Rage, 2006
 * Vol. 7: Street Justice, 2015

Works as Kristine Grayson
Kristine Kathryn Rusch writes romances, under the name "Kristine Grayson".

 * Utterly Charming, 2000
 * Thoroughly Kissed, 2001
 * Completely Smitten, 2002
 * Simply Irresistible, 2003
 * Absolutely Captivated, 2004
 * Totally Spellbound, 2005
 * Wickedly Charming, 2011

Works as Sandy Schofield
Kristine Kathryn Rusch and Dean Wesley Smith use the common pseudonym "Sandy Schofield" for a part of their collaborative works.

 * Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: The Big Game, 1993
 * Aliens: Rogue, 1995
 * Quantum Leap: The Loch Ness Leap, 1997
 * Predator: Big Game, 1999

Works as Kathryn Wesley
Kristine Kathryn Rusch and Dean Wesley Smith use the common pseudonym "Kathryn Wesley" for a part of their collaborative works.

 * The 10th Kingdom, 2000
 * Aladdin, 2000
 * The Monkey King, 2001
 * Salem Witch Trials, 2003

Afterimage

 * Vol. 1: Afterimage, 1992
 * Vol. 1-2: Afterimage/Aftershock, 1998

The Tenth Planet

 * Vol. 1: The Tenth Planet, 1999
 * Vol. 2: The Tenth Planet: Oblivion, 2000
 * Vol. 3: The Tenth Planet: Final Assault, 2000

Roswell

 * No Good Deed, 2001
 * Little Green Men, 2002

Classic

 * The Rings of Tautee, 1996
 * Treaty's Law, 1997
 * New Earth 5: Thin Air, 2000

The Next Generation

 * Klingon!, 1996
 * The Soldiers of Fear, 1996
 * Vectors: Double Helix #2, 1999

Voyager

 * The Escape, 1995
 * Echoes, additionally with Nina Kiriki Hoffman, 1998
 * Section 31: Shadow, 2001

Deep Space Nine

 * The Mist: The Captain's Table #3, 1998
 * The Long Night, 1996

Enterprise

 * By the Book, 2002

X-Men

 * X-Men, 2000

Article

 * "It Is Just Good Business," L. Ron Hubbard Presents Writers of the Future Volume VII, pp. 322–329. Bridge Publications: Los Angeles. 1991.

Critical studies and reviews of Rusch's work
———————
 * A murder of clones
 * The Peyti crisis
 * The Peyti crisis
 * Bibliography notes

title: Kristine Kathryn Rusch