text:
Wiktionary:Votes/2021-08/Nullifying the previous templates vote

Nullifying the previous templates vote
Voting on: Nullifying Wiktionary:Votes/2021-04/Creation of Template:inh+ and Template:bor+, and holding that the two templates in question did not require a vote or consensus support for creation.

Rationale: The creation of templates has never required a vote. Therefore, the establishment of our previous templates vote was improper and should be annulled. In addition, some users have claimed that the “failure” of our previous vote is a ground to foreclose the operation of the two new templates. This vote would declare that argument invalid and affirm the legitimacy of the creation and deployment of the two templates.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 00:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Imetsia (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] '''User talk:Inqilābī § Regarding etymologies...
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]]
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] User talk:Benwing2 § In light of your automated standardisations…
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]]
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2021-04/Creation of Template:inh+ and Template:bor+
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary:Votes/2021-04/Creation of Template:inh+ and Template:bor+
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Requests for deletion/Others § Template:bor+ and Template:inh+
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer_parlour/2021/June
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] User talk:Victar § Imetsia's block
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] User talk:Svartava § bor+
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] User talk:Imetsia § Victar’s block
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] User:Imetsia/The new templates and User:Victar's block
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]]

Support

 * 1)  as nom. Imetsia (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  as I find these templates highly useful. I don't believe templates should even require a vote. Rishabhbhat (talk) 03:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  "[W]e don't generally require consensus to create a template; anyone can do so. So the fact that this vote failed with ‘no consensus’ has very little effect; all it means is that no one is required to create and/or use these templates.” https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/62934478 Llittleserie (talk) 04:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) . I fought for these when all seemed lost; is it not bloody obvious I'll support? Svārtava2 • 06:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 5)  -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴)  08:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 6)  --Tibidibi (talk) 12:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC) Clarification: weak support, agree with AG202 and Taimoorahmed.--Tibidibi (talk) 01:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 7)  as I find the templates useful and agree that they should have never required a vote. However, I do agree with those opposed thus far that this wasn't the best way to go about it and that it seems like continuous drama, as I mentioned in the discussion in Beer parlour. Regardless of how the vote plays out (though I've been expecting it to fail), there needs to be more clarity, and an actual solution needs to be reached. AG202 (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 8)  I disagree with the idea of nullifying because it causes further conflicts and would like to see this resolved, but this template is incredibly useful for someone like me and don't see why it shouldn't exist. -Taimoor Ahmed(گل بات؟) 17:29, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 9) I  this as the only step that could now pull us out of the terrible crisis. [Alternative history 1: User:Benwing2 goes ahead with templet creation following his support for the templets. Victar the Terrible nominates them for deletion; most people vote keep and the templets are declared fully legitimate. Alternative history 2: No user goes ahead with templet creation after the vote does not pass, and User:Inqilābī creates another vote (of a longer duration) after a while. This time more people participate in the vote and the vote passes.]  ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  19:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , this user our WT:NPA policy. --  19:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I never personally attack any fellow editor. All my activity (be it contributions or comments) are done or said in good faith. I can understand how Victar the Terrible is bent on getting me blocked, this is not something new. Ironically, this is the same user who brazenly uses the f-word all the time. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  21:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is your good faith, I'd hate to see what your bad faith looks like. Stop engaging in these borderline personal attacks. This is your last warning. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are happy to get me blocked, please do so. I do not regret saying things I know are not wrong. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  21:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Even as someone who feels passionately about the templates, the votes, the block, etc. I do agree that comments like "Victar the Terrible" are inappropriate. It's better to disagree with a user about the substance of their actions/beliefs rather than their character. Imetsia (talk) 21:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no idea. That was a cool epithet. I will not mind someone doing likewise to me. When will people become mature and stop getting irked by mild words? Come on, get over this childish complaints and all! ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  21:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 's comments on Victar are correct. The way he has been replacing new good templates is utterly awful. When most agreed to it. We didn't impose anything on him, why does he have to. He pushes users to make votes, so that he gets to oppose. He didn't edit Prakrit, neither he does now, but he opposed Votes/2021-03/Merging Prakrit lects into one. He got the vote created as he wanted to oppose. I didn't realise his intentions then, and supported his reasons for vote. When all arguments were stated and his concerns (rather excuses to oppose) addressed, he didn't change his vote. Really bad that he was unblocked. Special:MobileDiff/63422167 . —Svārtava2 • 04:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm just going to leave here... --  06:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * That’s irrelevant here. Why bother if you were uninvolved there? ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  09:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) ; just to permanently resolve the matter around the misguided attempts to delete the templates. That some have taken it upon them to 'interpret' a result barely short of a supermajority as a consensus to delete is deplorable and wikilawyering at its worst. ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  10:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm certainly not going to try and change your option on the goal of this vote, but two points: 1. whether a vote is "barely short" of passing or not doesn't matter -- it still doesn't pass, and 2. the previous vote was for the creation of the templates in question, not their deletion, yet even after the vote didn't pass, the templates were created regardless, and for the record, were never deleted. -- 17:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * A bit over 1/3 of the votes is not enough to establish a consensus for deletion, because the default isn't that such templates should be deleted so that is not the status quo to fall back on. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  19:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  what LB said. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 13:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) .  The previous vote was unnecessary.  Time we recognise that. Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 17:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  - It isn't a bad thing to acknowledge that an anomaly has happened. In fact, it is the appropriate thing to do. I am in favour of stating that "the creation of new templates doesn't require a vote", a sensible and workable stance worthy of explicit affirmation. --Frigoris (talk) 18:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 4)  I never heard of template creation requiring a vote, that seems kind of silly. That's not required on Wikipedia so I don't see why we need it here. Geracruzcolusa (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 5)  – not only because I think the vote should not have been held to start with, but also because acceptance may clear the air. Alas, it does not look like this is going to happen.  --Lambiam 13:49, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The reason a vote was initially needed was because it undermines and subverts Votes/2017-06/borrowing, borrowed. It was a contentious issue then, and it's a contentious now. If it wasn't contentious, it would have passed with flying colors. -- 17:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The 2017 proposal was not well designed. Imagine a user who wants a solution that allows, simultaneously, (1) users not to have to manually enter the text “Borrowed from” for each instance where they want it to be displayed (covering most cases), and (2) this text not to always be there, so that some other text can be used, e.g., “From”, or “Possibly borrowed from”, should they so wish. Proposal 1 was incompatible with wish (1), and Proposal 2 was incompatible with wish (2). The vote gave a choice between two rigid options: never a canned pre-text, or always a canned pre-text. I liked neither option.  --Lambiam 20:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to defend the 2017 vote -- I, in fact, voted against it -- I was simply pointing out that there is presence for the need of a vote to overturn it. As I stated in the last vote, I might have supported bor+, but I don't, under any terms, support the creation of inh+ and . -- 20:44, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, I disagree with you regarding the premise that the creation of bor+ without prior vote would have undermined the outcome of the 2017 vote. I think that it was a mistake to hold a vote on its creation. There is nothing dishonorable about admitting a mistake, and I interpret the present proposal as offering the community an opportunity to do so – and expressly not as an attempt to change the outcome of a vote because you don't like it. --Lambiam 21:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * To be clear, you're not just disagreeing with me, but others who oppose this vote. To quote SGconlaw below, "circumventing [the 2017 vote] by creating a new template and then arguing that no vote is necessary to create a template seems quite wrong in the circumstances." -- 21:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It should indeed be clear that I also disagree with SGconlaw. I think that in this case you are both wrong. --Lambiam 15:10, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  My thoughts are set out on the discussion page of Imetsia. However, I recently noticed that a user (I don't remember who it was) used a word between the words “Borrowed” and “from”. This spelling will not work with the bor+ template. Gnosandes (talk) 04:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, so the template will be used in this case. It is not that its usage is being stopped. There is simply added functionality. Rishabhbhat (talk) 11:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  I'll support it so the new templates could be used freely. Birdofadozentides (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) ??? This is a weird vote though. I will use the templates regardless of the outcome. Benwing2 (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  on the grounds that the previous vote was unnecessary and somewhat out of process. Normally I wouldn't participate in a vote that sought just to overturn the results of another recent vote. It is true that there was a vote to remove the "Borrowed from" text from templates, so I don't feel strongly about this, but if memory serves, the point of the previous vote was that the template at the time included the text by default, which could be annoying. This retains the option either way. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 00:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 4)  I don't see what is the point of allowing people to vote for templates to be created. If a template is indeed taking up unnecessary space, it can be deleted. — Fredrick Campbell (talk) 04:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 5)  The templates are very useful and should be kept. Imranqazi90 (talk) 14:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 6)  I think enough reasons have been given above. ᛙᛆᚱᛐᛁᚿᛌᛆᛌ ᛭ Wiktionary's most active Proto-Norse editor ᛭ Ask me anything 18:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) . I don't have terribly strong feelings about the templates; at this point, I might actually be slightly in favour of their existence. However, I do have strong feelings about the idea of "nullifying" a vote to get one's way after an unfavourable consensus. The solution to a poorly conceived vote is not yet another poorly conceived vote. Go work this out like adults (that is, with a discussion), instead of edit-warring, blocking, and creating bureaucratic counter-votes. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) . Enough drama already. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 04:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) . I posted this comment on the talk page: “Is this vote necessary? The heart of the matter is whether in etymology sections the phrases borrowed from and inherited from should be expressly used or not. Why not have a discussion about that instead? Everything else flows from that.” (Imetsia posted a reply.) I really see little point in arguing back and forth about the templates if the primary issue isn’t dealt with. — SGconlaw (talk) 05:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , the first vote flew right over my head (I was probably on my spring sabbatical), so I apologise for not having participated first time around. With that said, I second Metaknowledge – I'm pretty "meh" when it comes to these templates, but starting a new vote to nullify the previous one just because some disagree with the outcome, is counterintuitive and sets a bad example for any current or future vote around here. --Robbie SWE (talk) 08:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * This might be one of the greatest misconceptions about this vote. The nullification effort is not about a disagreement "with the outcome," but a disagreement with the inception. The first vote should never have been created to begin with and was the direct result of "Victar's manipulation of another user" (quoting myself).
 * If the nullification effort "sets a bad example," just think of what precedent not annulling the previous vote would establish. If any one user disagrees with a policy, community decision, etc. they would be free to obstruct its operation. They would be able to engage in all manner of edit-warring, unfair enforcement, etc. until they're happy with the result. If anything, it would be this one user who would have their way with our policies "just because [they] disagree with the outcome." Imetsia (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I respectfully disagree Imetsia. This vote should never have been created - how is this any different from requesting that a term is undeleted just a mere week after it has been deleted? Of course Victar shouldn't have gone on a deletion spree, but there are other ways of dealing with such an issue and creating a new vote to nullify the previous isn't one of them. --Robbie SWE (talk) 21:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) . This is a new variety of edit war, and Imetsia should know better. DonnanZ (talk) 09:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  this vote in its principle. See my comment at Beer Parlour. I've nothing more to say. Thadh (talk) 09:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  😬 — Fenakhay ( تكلم معاي · ما ساهمت ) 16:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) As I've stated before, I'm not against the templates per se: if people want to save keystrokes, let them do that. But I think having two sets of competing templates is bad, and here's what I think we should do to avoid that (I'll be quoting myself): "1) the use of  and  would be tolerated in new instances (i.e. when they add a precision that wasn't there before); 2) they could not be used to replace the old templates when these are already preceded by "Borrowed from"/"Inherited from" (i.e. when it has no impact on the users' end); 3) on the contrary, they could be replaced by the old templates by whoever should wish to do so. They would be in a state of permanent semi-deprecation, if you want." Apart from the fact that the new templates create a link to the glossary - something which I'm not convinced is necessary - I'm yet to see a cogent reason to oppose this; all I see is a weird attachment to the templates themselves. As Imetsia said, "There is no race to see how widespread the templates can become, or if one template can overtake the other"; so why should it matter that the new ones are systematically being replaced by the old ones, as long as one can use them when they want to save some typing? But since the templates defenders seem to be opposed to that idea, I'm forced to . Besides, I agree with Sgconlaw that rather than arguing about this, we should be discussing . Finally, I disagree with the notion that the initial vote shouldn't have been held to begin with. I will once again quote Thadh: "." PUC – 12:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. I don't know if template creation requires a vote or not (someone please direct me to the relevant written policy), but it seems to me that if there was a prior consensus established through a vote that and  should not display "Borrowed from" and "Inherited from", then creating and using  and  was completely inconsistent with that consensus. The proper procedure is to revisit the earlier decision and clarify whether "Borrowed from" and "Inherited from" should appear in etymologies, and if so, whether they should be manually typed or incorporated into the templates. — SGconlaw (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I've explained why (a) template creation doesn't need a vote and (b) why using bor+ and inh+ is not inconsistent with our prior consensus at . Imetsia (talk) 17:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I don't see how the creation of and  is consistent with "Votes/2017-06/borrowing, borrowed". The proposal which carried was proposal 1: "Remove the 'Borrowing from' text altogether from the output of, and add 'Borrowed from' outside the template." The template  specifically re-adds "Borrowed from" inside the template. Personally I have no strong feelings over whether  should automatically generate the "Borrowed from" text or not; it may well be more convenient to have the template do so. However, since there was already consensus on not having the text generated by , I cannot see how creating a new template  to do that very thing can be consistent with the earlier vote. The earlier discussion can be reopened to see if consensus has changed, but circumventing it by creating a new template and then arguing that no vote is necessary to create a template seems quite wrong in the circumstances. — SGconlaw (talk) 18:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The version of before the 2017 vote always added the pre-text “Borrowing from”. There are instances where the entry should be categorized in some category “X term borrowed from Y”, but this pre-text does not work (such as, “..., or borrowed from ...”). Better then not to have any pre-text than an inflexible one that usually works but sometimes stands in the way. The 2017 proposal was not, “No template that categorizes terms in a category of borrowings shall add a pre-text”. It was an awkward vote on an awkward version of, not a vote on a nonexistent entry  . One might as well (mis)interpret the outcome of the vote as requiring each use of  to be preceded by a manually added “Borrowed from”, which would defeat the purpose.  --Lambiam 11:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * my understanding of the intent of the earlier vote was that should not be hard-wired to produce the text "Borrowing from". I appreciate that there was no vote saying that "Borrowed from" should no longer be used (and indeed I manually type this in where appropriate), but I think it was ill advised for another template like  to be created to then hard-wire the text again. This creates the bad precedent that if there is a vote on a particular template X that editors don't like, they'll just create another template Y that ignores the consensus of that vote and argue that the consensus was limited to just template X. Let's have a discussion about the real issue of whether the text "borrowed from" should be used or not, instead of creating a multiplicity of similar templates. — SGconlaw (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It is fine to have a discussion on a proposal to change the uses of “Borrowed from” in etymology sections to just “From”. However, that was not what the vote was about. I see no reason to assume that the intent and purview of the earlier vote went beyond what was stated in the proposal and its discussion. The outcome of the vote was the agreement that the hard-wired side effect of producing a given text is undesirable. I do not see an argument for extending this agreement to a presumed agreement that the "soft-wired" production of a similar text by other means is also undesirable. --Lambiam 15:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Irrespective of the outcome of this vote, I am thinking of writing a BP post as to why we really need these templates. Or else life would be harder for us… ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  17:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  DTLHS (talk) 23:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 19:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Is it because you "don't understand what it means to 'nullify' the vote" per the BP discussion? (In which case, I can clarify further as much as you'd like.) Or is it because of some other reason? Imetsia (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * In general I am likely to oppose do-over votes. In particular, we have a survey of the community on this topic and I don't want to pretend it didn't happen.  The lawyers say the vote didn't affirmatively do anything.  But it is still an opinion poll.  Unfortunately our customs do not allow setting up a binding vote on mutually exclusive options; there is always a chance that nobody will gain a supermajority.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 22:09, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  Jberkel 23:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  Trying to nullify a vote you don't like is so 2020. —Mahāgaja · talk 09:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  Per Mahāgaja. Masonthelime (talk) 12:15, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 4)  on procedural grounds mentioned. And, if a template annoys someone enough to organize a vote against it and a sufficient number of people express their agreement by voting, that template can be removed. Templates don't need prior approval, but can be disapproved and removed by vote. DCDuring (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * So, just to see if I understand you correctly, you agree with the substance on the vote but oppose it because you see this as a hasty revote? Did I get that right? Imetsia (talk) 22:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no opinion on the substance, but strenuously object to the idea that a vote can't be used to challenge a template and to voting again after a short interval, ie, sore loser behavior. DCDuring (talk) 22:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * To be precise, the vote did not challenge any existing templates – the outcome of the vote merely established the lack of an agreement on the perceived need for these proposed templates. The proposal failing, we returned to the status quo ante. --Lambiam 15:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The status quo was that bor and inh have no lead text. Replacing said entries with NAME + is breaking with the status quo and a reversal of the votes and discussions that set it. --  18:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The introducing new templates doesn't actually change the status quo. New templates are introduced all the time. Setting up rules on how and when to use them, that's changing the status quo. 110521sgl (talk) 22:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The definition of status quo: “the state of things; the way things are, as opposed to the way they could be; the existing state of affairs.” The "existing state of affairs" is that bor and inh are the default derivation templates for etymologies. Replacing them with bor+ and inh+ is change of the current "the state of things". -- 23:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) . I don't think that this vote is the right way to pacify the underlying conflicts. We need more community, less administrative measures. --Akletos (talk) 09:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I see that you formerly supported the new templates; I understand that this is not the best method, but seeing as many people are in favour of it, I shall appreciate it if you would change your vote to Abstain. Cheers! ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  17:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 11:30, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  After looking into the facts some more, I'm going to have to oppose this. I'm all for the idea of inh+ and bor+, but I'm against overturning previous vote results. Now if we'd actually come together, create a page outlining the usages of templates and formats, forming a guide that all can follow, then we can talk reverting. 110521sgl (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Let me be clear that I have absolutely no opinion on the matter of the bor+ and inh+ templates. However, it is very concerning that because a vote on the creation of templates has failed, some believe that the templates may not be created or used. Our convention is that failure of a vote represents a return to the status quo, which is (in this case) that the templates may still be created. A failed vote already is a nullity, and I support that concept. As I see it, the correct order of events would have been to (a) create the templates, (b) begin to use them in a few entries, then for someone to either (c) get approval for a bot to replace them into a large number of entries or (d) send them to RFDO. Although I support the principle of this vote (in fact I could have voted "support per Llittleserie"), there would be some irony in me voting "support" here, as I don't think this vote has any meaning either. This, that and the other (talk) 03:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  per This, that and the other: "A failed vote already is a nullity". Kutchkutch (talk) 12:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that the past vote is already a nullity, because its foundations are invalid. But other users have continued to insist that the templates are illegitimate because of the failure of the last vote. We need to finally declare that justification null and void, and that's what this vote does.
 * I'm not entirely sure what is meant by "I don't think this vote has any meaning either." But insofar as it strikes down the aforementioned justification against the templates, I think it does have an impact. Even in the worse-case scenario, this vote's passage would lead to a PUC-and-the-idiom-label situation. That is, say user A implements the templates on one page and someone else (user B) reverts them. User A can revert user B once again and ask them to stop. If they don't, we can resort to administrative action. Then the new templates will be fully in operation, and we can enforce the results of this vote.
 * At bottom, I think we need every vote we can get to try to pass this proposal. Both of you seem to agree with the crux of this vote, so I encourage you to vote in support of it. Imetsia (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * @Imetsia I had already stated that another vote was a bad idea, but agreed since that looked like the last option. Is it possible to stop this vote? I suggest there be an admin-only discussion about these templates and the previous vote's failure's value. Svārtava2 • 11:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I suppose it's possible to stop this vote, but there's no precedent for doing so and what would it gain us? And I don't know the basis for an admin-only discussion. We generally operate on the consensus of the community, not a selection of administrators; and there's not much foundation for a departure from that standard. Besides, even that probably wouldn't achieve our desired result.
 * Here's a better idea: if this vote goes nowhere, wait for a few months and then propose a new vote. PUC and others have convinced me that the better approach would be to discuss whether to reincorporate "Borrowed from" into the bor template; rather than whether to use the new bor+ and inh+ templates. If we keep pushing for the new templates, making new votes, etc. right now, I think that would hurt our chances of getting the votes through.
 * In the meanwhile, there are many template-vote-adjacent decisions that we can work on. To begin with, the effort to pass the "sore-loser rule" should be defeated. Maybe there should be some discussion about forming a proper Arbitration Committee. Or maybe the 2/3-consensus standard should be relaxed and reconsidered. All valuable discussions to have while we wait our turn to resolve the templates situation.
 * Also, your new pings aren't working. Just use the ping template instead. Imetsia (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The admins only discussion on whether or not the previous vote bans the templates and how they think about their creation. An admins only discussion to declare that the earlier vote's failure doesn't mean that the templates can't be created. What do you say? We cant let victar revert all their usages based only on his interpretation of the vote. —Svārtava2 • 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess that matters of procedure, as distinguished from matters of policy, can be given to the hands of admins rather than the community at large. But to do that, we'd have to stop this vote midway through and... create a new admins-only vote?? When have we ever done something like that? This is something an Arbitration Committee could sift through, and (again) this is something we can work to build while we wait on the templates situation. Even suppose that we abort this vote and create a new one open just to admins. Where would that get us? I don't think a majority of our admins will all of a sudden support such a measure. Imetsia (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I support aborting this vote, or else victar will say that after 2 votes we definitely can't use bor+ & inh+. Svārtava2 • 15:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  per the above. The vote in question failed, so there's nothing to nullify. If the problem is that some editors keep insisting that a failed vote is equivalent to a successful vote for the opposite proposal, and using that as an excuse for edit-warring and other disruptive edits, then the solution is to block those editors until they stop disrupting the project, rather than creating a second vote for them to willfully misinterpret the outcome of. —Ruakh TALK 00:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I did block the main edit-warrior in this case (Victar) for doing exactly what you describe. But then Mahāgaja unblocked the user on dubious grounds. What do you suggest we do in such a situation? Imetsia (talk) 00:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't understand the situation well enough to make a good suggestion. Some things I think you should think about:
 * Can you just leave this issue alone for a while, and let tempers die down? Like — can you get by without these templates for now?
 * People on the "other side" from you seem to be saying that these templates violate some other earlier vote. Have you looked into that statement? Do you understand why they say that? Do you agree with them? If you disagree, then what are your counterarguments?
 * More generally, are the people on the "other side" from you making any other arguments that you can agree with, or where you can at least understand where they're coming from? Are they making any arguments that you don't fully understand, and would like them to elaborate on?
 * Are there options that have been proposed but not really discussed, or possible options that haven't even been proposed, that more people might be OK with?
 * Once you've looked at those things, you should be well-equipped to start one or more discussions to try to sort out the issues amicably, to see if everyone's concerns can be addressed, etc. (N.B. Discussions, not votes. Votes don't create consensus, they just capture it.)
 * Edited to clarify: The above are rhetorical questions. I'm suggesting that you think about them — I am not asking you, or anyone else, to reply here with answers. My goal is to help sow the seeds of potential fruitful discussion in the future (whereas I think that anyone trying to answer them here would be likely to end up just re-airing grievances).
 * —Ruakh TALK 01:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC); edited 08:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  I am trying to generate a capacity to participate here, and I will just say that the significance of annulling of a vote ending in no consensus (the first two sentences of the above "Rationale" seems obscure from my extremely limited viewpoint- I would want to have a greater fleshing out of that. The "In addition" sentences seem reasonable. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 02:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The last vote ended in no consensus, but some users have understood it as a consensus that the templates should be banned. Thus, Victar has been reverting the new templates on sight despite the fact that they have been completely legitimate. What's their justification? That they're enforcing the "failure" of the last vote and reverting things to the status quo.
 * To make matters worse, that original vote should never have occurred in the first place. The creation and deployment of templates has never required a vote. It should now be made clear that our prior templates vote was a procedural nonstarter AND that it cannot be interpreted as a decision to strike down the bor+ and inh+ templates.
 * Lingo stated it nicely when he said that the "vote does not carry force to disallow the creation or existence of these templates anyway" (my emphasis). I want to make that explicit. I want this vote to declare, once and for all, that the previous vote is unenforceable -- that it "does not carry force." Imetsia (talk) 14:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * : Basically what User:Sgconlaw said. The real issue was whether to write "inherited from" and "borrowed from" in etymologies and when. (For instance, to me it seems unnecessary to write it when one language only ever inherits from another, like Middle English from Old English. But maybe it's helpful for newcomers.) Having another vote on the templates isn't necessary if we agree that we want that wording in etymologies and if and  makes it easier to add it. (I gather some people have already been adding that wording to etymologies and that's why they are in favor of the templates.) I'm abstaining because this nullification concept is weirdly conceived and avoids the real issue. I think the original vote was not a good idea either because the wording of etymologies is better resolved in discussions. — Eru·tuon 03:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  per TT&TO.  – Guitarmankev1 (talk) 13:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * – You are all basing your abstention on the formal argument that a failed vote means no change of status, and so was effectively a no-op. While I agree, it seems clear to me (seeing how that vote failure was interpreted following the creation of the templates) that failure of the present vote will not be interpreted as a nullity, but as a victory for those who also saw the failure of the previous vote as more than that. Also, there is more to the present vote than clearly establishing (for those who do not see the light) that the previous vote, by its failure, carries no weight. It also aims to establish, as a principle, that creation of a new template does not require prior approval by voting. So therefore the vote itself was improper – it should not have been held in the first place. If you agree with that principle, then please reconsider your position.  --Lambiam 21:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) . Ultimateria (talk) 16:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Decision

 * No consensus: 22-17-7. Imetsia (talk) 04:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

07:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * This vote was useless, just like the earlier one. Many people who have no opinion on the templets have cast an oppose vote (including former supporters of the templets). Now, for what it’s worth, the new templates can be discontinued from use only by a vote that seeks to ban them (note that the RFD request already failed). Until then, I think can see to it that no vandalism occurs in entries using inh+ & bor+.  ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  06:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Imetsia also. There is not any consensus to revert the templatesas well Svārtava2 • 08:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It cannot be the case that the two possibilities of a proposal succeeding and it failing both result in a status change. It would leave voters who wish the status to remain unchanged no option – damned if you support, damned if you oppose, and damned if you abstain. It should IMO be clear that we need to be more careful in formulating proposal texts and ensuring that it is clear what we are voting on. Given the variety of viewpoints among editors, everyone who cares about the outcome should always have at least one option they can vote for. Most abstainers in this vote abstained because they thought the vote was meaningless, not because they didn’t care. Based on the votes and the rationales given above for abstaining, a consensus can be seen that none of the votes concerning bor/inh templates since the 2017 vote resulted in a status change. --Lambiam 09:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːrə

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːrə


text:
اوبال

Noun

 * 1) delinquency, sin, fault

title: اوبال


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːra

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːra


text:
సర్పి

Noun

 * 1) clarified butter, ghee
 * 2) water

title: సర్పి


text:
Jackfield ware

Noun

 * 1) A black glazed earthenware from Jackfield in Shropshire

title: Jackfield ware


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/iːa

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/iːa


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ədn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ədn̩


text:
мажак

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Noun

 * 1) ear

title: мажак


text:
jackfield

Noun

 * 1) An array of jacks mounted on a panel, typically in a recording or broadcasting studio, used to route signals to or from multiple devices.

title: jackfield


text: వద్ద

title: వద్ద


text:
నాటో దేశాలు

Noun

 * 1) member countries of NATO

title: నాటో దేశాలు


text:
ការបញ្ចុះថ្លៃ

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) discount, price reduction

title: ការបញ្ចុះថ្លៃ


text:
اوبسپی

Noun

 * 1) otter

title: اوبسپی


text:
jackshay

Noun

 * 1)  A pot (incorporating a cup) used to make tea

title: jackshay


text:
ဂူၜဴ

Etymology
🇰🇲

Proper noun

 * 1) (ကွာန်)

Noun

 * 1) The cane forest.

title: ဂူၜဴ


text: Category:mnw:Villages in Burma

title: Category:mnw:Villages in Burma


text:
jackyard

Noun

 * 1)  A spar at the top of a mast that supports a topsail

title: jackyard


text:
扳平

Verb

 * 1) to equalize; to level the score

title: 扳平


text: bānpíng

title: bānpíng


text:
taronja de sang

Noun

 * 1) blood orange

title: taronja de sang


text:
చిక్కుకంపు

Noun

 * 1) rancid smell (chiefly from hair oil which has been applied without being washed well for days or weeks)

title: చిక్కుకంపు


text: 扳指兒

title: 扳指兒


text: 扳指儿

title: 扳指儿


text: bānzhir

title: bānzhir


text:
اوبوس

Etymology
Ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) howitzer

title: اوبوس


text:
нуц

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) son-in-law

title: нуц


text:
найц

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) son-in-law

title: найц


text:
a occhio

Etymology
lit. 'at eye'.

Prepositional phrase

 * 1) by only visual observation, without measurement; roughly; by eye

title: a occhio


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/kēkir-

Etymology
Akin to 🇨🇬, ; 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to belch

Descendants

 * Oghur:
 * Common Turkic:
 * Common Turkic:

 * Oghuz:
 * Karluk:
 * Kipchak:
 * North Kipchak:
 * West Kipchak:
 * East Kipchak:
 * South Kipchak:
 * Siberian:
 * North Siberian:
 * South Siberian:
 * Sayan:
 * Yenisei:
 * Kipchak:
 * North Kipchak:
 * West Kipchak:
 * East Kipchak:
 * South Kipchak:
 * Siberian:
 * North Siberian:
 * South Siberian:
 * Sayan:
 * Yenisei:
 * South Kipchak:
 * Siberian:
 * North Siberian:
 * South Siberian:
 * Sayan:
 * Yenisei:
 * Siberian:
 * North Siberian:
 * South Siberian:
 * Sayan:
 * Yenisei:
 * Yenisei:
 * Yenisei:
 * Yenisei:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/kēkir-


text:
বুঢ়ী

Etymology
, from. .

Adjective

 * 1)  aged, old
 * 2)  senior
 * 3)  knowledgeable

Noun

 * 1) old woman
 * 2)  senior person
 * 3)  knowledgeable person

title: বুঢ়ী


text: passo passo

title: passo passo


text:
اودال

Noun

 * 1) saint, religious anchorite or hermit

title: اودال


text: kalopanaxsaponins

title: kalopanaxsaponins


text:
搿眼

Pronoun

 * 1)  these

title: 搿眼


text:
доьзал

Etymology
Akin to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) family

title: доьзал


text:
maarif

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) enlightenment
 * 2)  education

Etymology
From, from , plural of.

Noun

 * 1)  education

title: maarif


text: Wrenthorpe

title: Wrenthorpe


text: yndis

title: yndis


text: auð

title: auð


text:
𑀉𑀫𑁆𑀳𑀸

Etymology
, feminine of.

title: 𑀉𑀫𑁆𑀳𑀸


text: englum

title: englum


text: engla

title: engla


text:
passerell

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) common linnet
 * 2)  greenhorn, novice
 * 3)  a shrewd person
 * 1)  a shrewd person

title: passerell


text: sitr

title: sitr


text: sazt

title: sazt


text: hnígr

title: hnígr


text: dýrðar

title: dýrðar


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/skabʰ-

Root

 * 1) to scratch, scrape

Derived terms

 * *skábʰ-e-ti
 * *skabʰ-on-s ~ *skabʰ-en-
 * *skabʰ-men-s ~ *skabʰ-mn-
 * *skabʰ-ter-s ~ *skabʰ-tr-
 * *skobʰ-i-s
 * *skabʰ-ti-s
 * *skabʰ-iH-s
 * *skábʰ-es-s
 * *skábʰ-o-s
 * *skabʰ-ó-s
 * *skabʰ-eh₂-s
 * *skabʰ-ró-s
 * *-skābʰ-yo-s
 * *skabʰ-ti-s
 * *skabʰ-iH-s
 * *skábʰ-es-s
 * *skábʰ-o-s
 * *skabʰ-ó-s
 * *skabʰ-eh₂-s
 * *skabʰ-ró-s
 * *-skābʰ-yo-s
 * *skábʰ-o-s
 * *skabʰ-ó-s
 * *skabʰ-eh₂-s
 * *skabʰ-ró-s
 * *-skābʰ-yo-s
 * *skabʰ-eh₂-s
 * *skabʰ-ró-s
 * *-skābʰ-yo-s
 * *skabʰ-ró-s
 * *-skābʰ-yo-s
 * *-skābʰ-yo-s
 * *-skābʰ-yo-s
 * *-skābʰ-yo-s

 * Unsorted formations:
 * Balto-Slavic
 * Balto-Slavic


text:
Lebensrune

Noun

 * 1)  The rune ᛉ (Algiz), symbolizing life according to Ariosophy.

title: Lebensrune


text:
ផាសុក

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) to be comfortable, content

title: ផាសុក


text: stóli

title: stóli


text: stóls

title: stóls


text:
អផាសុក

Etymology
From, equivalent to 🇰🇲.

Adjective

 * 1) to be uncomfortable, annoyed, worried

title: អផាសុក


text: bóls

title: bóls


text:
搿點

Pronoun

 * 1)  these (few)

title: 搿點


text:
unpreferentially

Adverb

 * 1) Not preferentially.

title: unpreferentially


text: gjafar

title: gjafar


text:
мечин

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Noun

 * 1) monkey

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Noun

 * 1) monkey

title: мечин


text:
Wiktionary:About Sumerian

Cuneiform

 * Sumerian entries are always created in cuneiform script.
 * The best practice is to copy/paste it from the ePSD2 site.
 * To type cuneiform signs when you know their transliteration you can use one of the following online editors:
 * Qantuppi 𒄀𒁾
 * Cuneify
 * Akkadian Keyboard - Advanced
 * Cuneiform IME for macOS
 * We use the template right under   to link the individual signs in the term. See:
 * In individual cuneiform entries (like, , etc.) we add the template under the   section (right before  ).

Transliteration

 * We use the parameter tr in the, , , etc. templates to give the transliteration of Sumerian cuneiform signs.
 * We transliterate each cuneiform sign in lowercase, separated by a dash (-). See for example.
 * If more than one transliteration is possible for a sign, we can enter more then one by separating them with a comma (,). See for example.
 * For indexing we use subscripts numbers (₀ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄ ₅ ₆ ₇ ₈ ₉). You can find them at the bottom of the edit window if you choose Akkadian and Sumerian from the drop-down menu on the left.
 * We use the same transliteration system used by ePSD2, with the only exception of the sound, that we transliterate as g̃. You can insert this letter by choosing Akkadian and Sumerian from the drop-down menu on the bottom left of the editing window and clicking on "g̃" (or "G̃" if you need it capitalised). This is done to keep consistency with older transliteration/Akkadian sumerograms that might only have a g where more recent reconstructions have g̃, and facilitate their searching. The character ⟨ŋ⟩ used in some publications doesn't have the same flexibility.
 * Determinatives will use the template . See for example.

Normalisation

 * We use the parameter ts in the, , , etc. templates to give the normalisation of a Sumerian word. A word's normalisation is the reconstructed "pronunciation" of a Sumerian word and correspond to the spelling of entries on ePSD2. See for example 𒀀𒀊𒁀 a'abak.
 * When a word's transliteration is identical to its normalisation, we will only use the transliteration parameter (tr. See for example.
 * When a word's transliteration is not identical to its normalisation, we will always indicate its normalisation, even if the only difference is the lack of an index. See for example.
 * Proper nouns are capitalised. See for example.
 * To separate two vowels belonging to different elements of a compound, we use the straight apostrophe ( ' ). See for example.
 * We indicate vowel contraction with a circumflex (similarly to how it is done in normalizing Akkadian lemmas). See for example.
 * Enclitic particles (case endings, possessives, etc) and verbal elements are written attached to the noun or verb they refer to without a dash. See for example or.

Verbs
In the following two cases, we use the template.

 * Compound verbs
 * Sumerian phrasal verbs (known in the field as "compound verbs") follow the layout of.

 * Verbs with reduplicated forms
 * Verbs with reduplicated forms follow the layout of and.

Alternative forms

 * Alternative forms are given using the template right under   (if they refer to the main entry) or under   if they refer to just one individual meaning of the entry. See for example  and.

Emesal

 * Emesal words corresponding to Emegir (Standard Sumerian) entries are given using the template . See for example . For the template to work, you will need to add the corresponding Emegir and Emesal data to the list in Module:sux-registers/data (follow the format of previus entries).

Romanization of cuneiform signs

 * To facilitate searches of cuneiform signs by their transliteration, we use a simplified romanization system that represents all diacritics/subscript indexes in a way that makes them easy to type on a keyboard. This is identical to the one used on the ePSD2 site. Most letters are identical to the proper transliteration system. Here is a list of those that are different:
 * {| class="wikitable"

! Transliteration !! Romanization
 * g̃ || j
 * š || sz
 * ḫ || h
 * ₀-₉ || 0 - 9
 * ₓ || X (see for example: sigX)
 * }
 * Here you can see all currently existing Sumerian romanisation entries: Category:Sumerian_romanizations
 * ₀-₉ || 0 - 9
 * ₓ || X (see for example: sigX)
 * }
 * Here you can see all currently existing Sumerian romanisation entries: Category:Sumerian_romanizations
 * Here you can see all currently existing Sumerian romanisation entries: Category:Sumerian_romanizations

 * There are still a lot of romanizations missing. If you find that a romanization doesn't exist, you can create it following the model of mesz3.

Grammars

 * A descriptive grammar of Sumerian, Abraham Hendrik Jagersma
 * An Introduction to the Grammar of Sumerian, Gábor Zólyomi
 * Introduction to Sumerian Grammar, Daniel A. Foxvog

Dictionaries

 * The electronic Pennsylvania Sumerian Dictionary
 * Elementary Sumerian Glossary, Daniel A. Foxvog
 * Sumerian Lexicon, John A. Halloran
 * List of Emesal words in ETCSL

title: Wiktionary:About Sumerian


text: býðr

title: býðr


text: bjóðum

title: bjóðum


text:
Todesrune

Noun

 * 1)  The rune ᛦ (Yr), symbolizing death according to Ariosophy.

title: Todesrune


text:
промовити

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to utter, to say

title: промовити


text: hlýðir

title: hlýðir


text: vistar

title: vistar


text:
промовляти

Etymology
From the stem of. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to utter, to say

title: промовляти


text:
шуьйра

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) wide

title: шуьйра


text:
шера

Etymology
Akin to 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) smooth

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) wide

title: шера


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2021/August 27


text: Todesrunen

title: Todesrunen


text: Lebensrunen

title: Lebensrunen


text:
муҥ

Etymology 1
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 ,🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Numeral

 * 1) thousand

Etymology 2
From. Cognate to these reconstruction terms.

Noun

 * 1) grief

Etymology
From. Cognate to these reconstruction terms.

Noun

 * 1)  grief, torment
 * 2) limit, boundary,  the fullest extent of something
 * 1) limit, boundary,  the fullest extent of something

Derived terms

 * and, both meaning "anguish", "suffering"
 * and, both meaning "anguish", "suffering"

title: муҥ


text:
ӏаса

Etymology
From Proto-Nakh.

Noun

 * 1) a stick

Etymology 1
Akin to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) calf

Etymology 2
From Proto-Nakh.

Noun

 * 1) a stick

title: ӏаса


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2021/August 21


text:
etosmuziko

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) ambient music

title: etosmuziko


text:
устагӏ

Etymology
Akin to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) sheep

title: устагӏ


text:
Nephele

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1)  A cloud nymph who figured prominently in the story of Phrixus and Helle.

Translations

 * French:
 * Italian: Nefele
 * Russian: Нефела

title: Nephele


text: Category:Rhymes:Polish/ɨna

title: Category:Rhymes:Polish/ɨna


text:
ӧлӱ

Etymology 1
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Numeral

 * 1) fifty

Etymology 2
From. Compare to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) dead

title: ӧлӱ


text:
anabaptizmus

Noun

 * 1) Anabaptism

title: anabaptizmus


text:
Ripton

Statistics

 * According to data collected by Forebears in 2014, Ripton is the 31980th most common surname in England, belonging to 111 individuals.

title: Ripton


text:
antifašizmus

Noun

 * 1) antifascism

title: antifašizmus


text:
antikapitalizmus

Noun

 * 1) anticapitalism

title: antikapitalizmus


text:
antikolonializmus

Noun

 * 1) anticolonialism

title: antikolonializmus


text:
цӏу

Etymology
See description under Ossetian цӕхх.

Noun

 * 1) salt

title: цӏу


text:
antropocentrizmus

Noun

 * 1) anthropocentrism

title: antropocentrizmus


text:
antisemitizmus

Noun

 * 1) anti-Semitism

title: antisemitizmus


text:
Talk:Kuomingtang

Nondifferentiation of -n and -ng
I don't know exactly what explains the spellings Jianxi, 'Kuomingtang', 'Xingjiang'/'Singkiang', Qinling/Qingling, Xingqing/Xinqing-, Xingping and Xinping are noted as confusable on , Guangxi/Citations:Guanxi, 'Jingsha', 'Beigang' for Beigan, 'Tungying' (when referring to Tungyin Citations:Tungyin), Mingfeng/Minfeng , Nuangdong/Nuandong - vs , Fenxian/Fengxian , Shaangxi, 'Shangtung' (Shandong  etc),  427th warning Pinhhai/Pinghai, Tongyong Pinyin: Cinpu/Cingpu , 'Guandong', Hsin/Hsing, Hsin/Hsing, maybe the second g in Ching-chong, , Yinchuan and 'Yingchuan', 'Jin'an' and 'Chingkankousaurus', but I have a strong suspicion that it has something to do with the infernal problem of Nondifferentiation of -n and -ng. This may be a kind of trend among misspellings which should be recognized, anticipated and explained to Wiktionary readers. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 17:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Kuomingtang


text:
astigmatizmus

Noun

 * 1) astigmatism

title: astigmatizmus


text:
промова

Etymology
. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  session of speaking, especially a long oral message given publicly by one person

title: промова


text:
мырчак

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Noun

 * 1) pea

title: мырчак


text:
biotechnológia

Noun

 * 1) biotechnology

title: biotechnológia


text:
margine di errore

Noun

 * 1) margin of error

title: margine di errore


text: margine d'errore

title: margine d'errore


text:
McCoyd

Etymology
Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to data collected by Forebears in 2014, McCoyd is the 367833rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 43 individuals.

title: McCoyd


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/abːa

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/abːa


text: shusse-uo

title: shusse-uo


text: shusse uo

title: shusse uo


text:
byrokracia

Noun

 * 1) bureaucracy

title: byrokracia


text: しゆつせうを

title: しゆつせうを


text: -löi-

title: -löi-


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/aja

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/aja


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːa

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːa


text:
సమాచారము

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) news, information, tidings, report, intelligence
 * 2) message
 * 3) what transpires, proceedings
 * 4) occurrence, events

title: సమాచారము


text:
charakterizácia

Noun

 * 1) characterization

title: charakterizácia


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɪsːə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɪsːə


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɪsːa

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɪsːa


text: Čhattísgarh

title: Čhattísgarh


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/iːə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/iːə


text:
мырч

Etymology
From. Cognates with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Noun

 * 1) pepper

title: мырч


text:
choroboplodnosť

Noun

 * 1) pathogenicity

title: choroboplodnosť


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/əln̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/əln̩


text: Highams

title: Highams


text: Sakania

title: Sakania


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/eːt

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/eːt


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɪə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɪə


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ədlɪ

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ədlɪ


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːn̩


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːə


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɔrn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɔrn̩


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/oːtn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/oːtn̩


text:
Hazaras

Proper noun

 * 1) An ethnic group of Afghanistan, originating from Turkic, Mongolic and Persian stock.

title: Hazaras


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/oːtə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/oːtə


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɔr

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɔr


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːsa

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːsa


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːs

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːs


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɪskə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɪskə


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/əɳ̩ə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/əɳ̩ə


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/əʁnə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/əʁnə


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ərnə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ərnə


text:
si vede

Etymology
lit. 'one sees'.

Interjection

 * 1) ; obviously

Phrase

 * 1) (with  + ind.) it is likely or obvious (that); it looks (like); it appears (that)
 * 1) (with  + ind.) it is likely or obvious (that); it looks (like); it appears (that)
 * 1) (with  + ind.) it is likely or obvious (that); it looks (like); it appears (that)

title: si vede


text: éaló

title: éaló


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ərn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ərn̩


text: Category:de:Runic letter names

title: Category:de:Runic letter names


text: hemimelias

title: hemimelias


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ərə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ərə


text:
hemimelic

Adjective

 * 1) Having or relating to hemimelia.

title: hemimelic


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɛsːa

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɛsːa


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɛs

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɛs


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːsə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɑːsə


text:
雲譎波詭

Idiom

 * 1) to be unpredictable and ever-changing; to be highly changeable

title: 雲譎波詭


text: 云谲波诡

title: 云谲波诡


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːsn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːsn̩


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːsə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːsə


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːsa

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːsa


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɛsːə

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɛsːə


text:
undersheriffship

Noun

 * 1) The office or jurisdiction of an undersheriff.

title: undersheriffship


text: undersheriffships

title: undersheriffships


text:
undersheriffwick

Noun

 * 1) The area of jurisdiction of an undersheriff.

title: undersheriffwick


text:
undershrubby

Adjective

 * 1) Being or resembling an undershrub.

title: undershrubby


text: guði

title: guði


text:
underpopulate

Verb

 * 1)  To populate with too few individuals.

title: underpopulate


text: underpopulates

title: underpopulates


text: underpopulating

title: underpopulating


text:
мин-

Verb

 * 1) to ride

title: мин-


text:
Talk:cocky

would it be worth a note pointing out, for the sake of new learners, that this word is typically not considered rude, nor a double entendre? — Soap — 17:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

 * The absence of a warning note seems enough to me. We don't have anything at shitake for instance. Equinox ◑ 17:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:cocky


text: heitir

title: heitir


text:
underproficient

Adjective

 * 1) Inadequately proficient.

title: underproficient


text:
overproficient

Adjective

 * 1) Very or excessively proficient.

title: overproficient


text:
mecmua

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) collection, periodical, magazine

title: mecmua


text:
underpetticoated

Adjective

 * 1) Wearing an underpetticoat.

title: underpetticoated


text:
underrecompensed

Adjective

 * 1) Insufficiently recompensed.

title: underrecompensed


text:
потенційний

Adjective

 * 1) potential

title: потенційний


text:
overrecompensed

Adjective

 * 1) Excessively recompensed.

title: overrecompensed


text:
korodaĵo

Noun

 * 1) a corrosive substance.

title: korodaĵo


text: korodaĵon

title: korodaĵon


text:
undertakerish

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of an undertaker funeral director.

title: undertakerish


text: korodaĵojn

title: korodaĵojn


text:
undertakerly

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of an undertaker funeral director.

title: undertakerly


text: korodaĵoj

title: korodaĵoj


text: Vryburg

title: Vryburg


text:
צג

Noun

 * 1) display, monitor, screen
 * 2) Set

title: צג


text:
galjonsfigur

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) figurehead both literally and figuratively

title: galjonsfigur


text:
Ariosophie

Etymology
, after.

Noun

 * 1)  Ariosophy

title: Ariosophie


text: deep squats

title: deep squats


text:
undethroned

Adjective

 * 1) Not dethroned.

Translations

 * French:

title: undethroned


text:
undethronable

Adjective

 * 1) That cannot be dethroned.

Translations

 * French:
 * Polish: nie dający się detronizować
 * Spanish: indestronable

title: undethronable


text: Category:Sinhalese learned borrowings from Sanskrit


text:
deep squat

Noun

 * 1)  In powerlifting, a special kind of squat movement in which the hips are lowered under the level of the knees.

Verb

 * 1)  To perform a deep squat movement.

title: deep squat


text:
dethronable

Adjective

 * 1) That may be dethroned.

Translations

 * French:
 * Spanish: destronable

title: dethronable


text:
undetrimental

Adjective

 * 1) Not detrimental.

title: undetrimental


text:
syväkyykky

Etymology
Compound from

Noun

 * 1)  deep squat
 * 2)  extreme truckling

title: syväkyykky


text:
undexterous

Adjective

 * 1) Not dexterous.

title: undexterous


text: undextrous

title: undextrous


text: Category:Sinhalese doublets

title: Category:Sinhalese doublets


text:
colpo di genio

Etymology
lit. 'stroke of genius'. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) stroke of genius

title: colpo di genio


text:
undiplomaed

Adjective

 * 1) Not having an academic diploma.

title: undiplomaed


text:
undisadvantageous

Adjective

 * 1) Not disadvantageous.

title: undisadvantageous


text:
lampo di genio

Etymology
lit. 'bolt of genius'. Compare 🇨🇬.

title: lampo di genio


text: Category:Sinhalese literary terms

title: Category:Sinhalese literary terms


text:
pàssera

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) blue rock thrush

title: pàssera


text:
دٲن

Noun

 * 1) pomegranate

title: دٲن


text:
先聲奪人

Idiom

 * 1) to overawe one's opponent first by a show of strength

title: 先聲奪人


text: 先声夺人

title: 先声夺人


text:
keşif

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) discovery, exploration
 * 2) invention
 * 3) study, research

Etymology
From, from , verbal noun of.

Noun

 * 1) discovery, exploration
 * 2) estimating (cost, value, condition)
 * 3)  reconnaissance

title: keşif


text: Rhymes:Esperanto/odi

title: Rhymes:Esperanto/odi


text: Template:RQ:Edward Hall Lancastre & Yorke


text:
unvituperative

Adjective

 * 1) Not vituperative.

title: unvituperative


text:
xalambrí

Etymology
Minorcan variant of.

Noun

 * 1)  dunnock

title: xalambrí


text:
undiscredited

Adjective

 * 1) Not discredited.

title: undiscredited


text:
undiscourageable

Adjective

 * 1) Not discourageable.

title: undiscourageable


text:
undisdained

Adjective

 * 1) Not disdained.

title: undisdained


text:
राऊत

Etymology
, from, , from. .

Proper noun

 * : Raut

title: राऊत


text:
undisestablished

Adjective

 * 1) Not disestablished.

title: undisestablished


text:
undisfranchised

Adjective

 * 1) Not disfranchised.

title: undisfranchised


text:
мостовий

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1)  bridge

title: мостовий


text:
Umtali

Proper noun

 * , Zimbabwe.

title: Umtali


text: caninizes

title: caninizes


text: caninizing

title: caninizing


text: caninized

title: caninized


text: Template:R:sga:LEIA

title: Template:R:sga:LEIA


text:
mettere a frutto

Etymology
lit. 'to put at fruit'.

Verb

 * 1) to put to work; to make use of; to put to good use

title: mettere a frutto


text:
optionalization

Noun

 * 1) The process of making something optional.

title: optionalization


text:
felinization

Noun

 * 1) The process or the result of felinizing.

title: felinization


text:
felinize

Verb

 * 1)  To make cat-like, or turn into a cat.
 * 2)  To adapt (a therapy) for use on cats.
 * a felinized antibody

Related terms

 * felinization

title: felinize


text: felinizes

title: felinizes


text: felinizing

title: felinizing


text: felinized

title: felinized


text:
angkatan darat

Etymology
Compound of 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) army.

title: angkatan darat


text:
frunevetmab

Noun

 * 1) A felinized monoclonal antibody used to treat osteoarthritis in cats.

title: frunevetmab


text:
fasinumab

Noun

 * 1) A human monoclonal antibody designed for the treatment of acute sciatic pain.

title: fasinumab


text:
fulranumab

Noun

 * 1) A monoclonal antibody against nerve growth factor, designed for the treatment of pain.

title: fulranumab


text:
undisinheritable

Adjective

 * 1) Not disinheritable.

title: undisinheritable


text:
undisinherited

Adjective

 * 1) Not disinherited.

title: undisinherited


text:
undislodgeable

Adjective

 * 1) Not dislodgeable.

title: undislodgeable


text:
undispatchable

Adjective

 * 1) Not dispatchable.

title: undispatchable


text: angair

title: angair


text:
Talk:meno che

Placement of the entry
Not sure if we should create this entry or just make a separate sense at the main lemma. We do have as a separate entry after all. Imetsia (talk) 18:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:meno che


text:
anggus

Noun

 * 1) bite the food with wide open mouth.

title: anggus


text:
Template:RQ:Edward Hall Lancastre & Yorke/documentation

Usage
This template may be used on Wiktionary entry pages to quote 's work The Vnion of the Two Noble and Illustre Famelies of Lancastre & Yorke (often known as Hall's Chronicle; 1550); the 1st edition (London: Richardi Graftoni, 1548;  ) is not currently available online. The template can be used to create a link to an online version of the work at the Internet Archive.

Parameters
The template takes the following parameters:

 * 1 or part – mandatory: the part of the work quoted from, as indicated in the first column of the following table:

 * 2 or chapter – the name of the chapter quoted from.
 * 3 or folio, and verso – mandatory in some cases: the work is numbered by folios rather than page numbers. The folio number is indicated on the top right corner of each recto (right-hand) page. Use 3 or folio to indicate the folio number in lowercase Roman numerals, and if quoting from a verso (left-hand) page specify 1 or yes; if verso is omitted, the template indicates that a recto (right-hand) page is quoted. If quoting a range of folios, for example, "folios cx, verso – cxi, recto", note the following:
 * Use folio and verso to specify the folio at the start of the range, and folioend and versoend (if required) to specify the folio at the end of the range.
 * In addition, use folioref and versoref to indicate the page to be linked to (usually the page on which the Wiktionary entry appears). (If quoting a recto page, omit versoend and versoref.)
 * These parameters must be specified to have the template link to the online version of the work.

Note:
 * The folio numbers restart from i in each part of the work, which is why specifying the name of the part is mandatory.
 * In the part of the work on Henry VI, folios ciij (103) and civ (104) are incorrectly numbered as cj (101) and cij (102), which are thus repeated. Use the correct folio numbers rather than the incorrect ones.

 * 4, text, or passage – a passage to be quoted from the work.
 * 5, t, or translation – a translation of the passage into contemporary English.
 * footer – a comment about the passage quoted.
 * brackets – use on to surround a quotation with brackets. This indicates that the quotation either contains a mere mention of a term (for example, "some people find the word manoeuvre hard to spell") rather than an actual use of it (for example, "we need to manoeuvre carefully to avoid causing upset"), or does not provide an actual instance of a term but provides information about related terms.

Examples

 * Wikitext:
 * ; or
 * Result:
 * Result:


text:
téaltaigh

Etymology 1
From older (assimilated to the suffix ), denominal from, from , verbal noun of an unattested , from  +  + , from , from , present imperfective of.

Verb

 * 1) to creep, sneak, slink

title: téaltaigh


text:
𑂈𑂀𑂒

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 /, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) high, tall, lofty

title: 𑂈𑂀𑂒


text:
undisorganized

Adjective

 * 1) Not disorganized.

title: undisorganized


text:
undisinterested

Adjective

 * 1) Not disinterested.

title: undisinterested


text:
undiscriminative

Adjective

 * 1) Not discriminative.

title: undiscriminative


text: téaltóigh

title: téaltóigh


text: téaltó

title: téaltó


text:
دانة

Etymology
From, borrowed and applied to pearl pieces specifically.

Noun

 * 1) a pearl of substantial size and beauty

Proper noun

 * 1) ; Dana; Danah

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  ear

title: دانة


text: Category:Rhymes:English/ɒmbə(ɹ)

title: Category:Rhymes:English/ɒmbə(ɹ)


text: Category:Proto-Indo-European terms belonging to the root *telh₂- (bear)


text: Category:Ancient Greek terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (bear)


text:
អព្យយៈ

Noun

 * : grammatical particle

title: អព្យយៈ


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Brythonic/gwɨrð

Etymology
Borrowed from (attested in the Appendix Probi), from  via syncope.

Adjective

 * 1)  green, verdant

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Brythonic/gwɨrð


text:
... lıyım

Etymology
A combination of two suffixes: and.

Phrase

 * 1) I am from ...
 * Ankaralıyım.
 * I'm from Ankara.
 * 1) I was born in ...
 * 2003'lüyüm.
 * I was born in 2003.

title: ... lıyım


text:
អព្យយសព្ទ

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1)  particle, indeclinable word

title: អព្យយសព្ទ


text: Category:Italian terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (bear)


text:
និបាតសព្ទ

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1)  particle, indeclinable word (as conjunctions, prepositions,...)

title: និបាតសព្ទ


text: Category:Rhymes:English/iːz

title: Category:Rhymes:English/iːz


text: Kalomo

title: Kalomo


text: griezels

title: griezels


text:
undissembling

Adjective

 * 1) Not dissembling.

title: undissembling


text:
undistrusted

Adjective

 * 1) Not distrusted.

title: undistrusted


text:
undisturbable

Adjective

 * 1) Not disturbable.

title: undisturbable


text:
undoctrinal

Adjective

 * 1) Not doctrinal.

title: undoctrinal


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/uːnn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/uːnn̩


text:
disturbable

Adjective

 * 1) Able to be disturbed.

title: disturbable


text:
undoffed

Etymology
From ; equivalent to.

Adjective

 * 1) Not doffed.

title: undoffed


text:
Arkley

Etymology
From +. Equivalent to.

Proper noun

 * , historically in.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Arkley is the 149395th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 110 individuals. Arkley is most common among White (95.45%) individuals.

title: Arkley


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːrn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʉːrn̩


text:
undomicilable

Adjective

 * 1) Not domicilable.

title: undomicilable


text:
undominoed

Adjective

 * 1) Not dressed in a domino.

title: undominoed


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʊrn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʊrn̩


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʊr

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ʊr


text:
кисела вода

Noun

 * 1)  mineral water

title: кисела вода


text:
supersoon

Etymology
Borrowed internationalism.

Adjective

 * 1) supersonic

title: supersoon


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɛ

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/ɛ


text:
ගූ

Etymology
, from. .

Noun

 * 1)  excrement

title: ගූ


text:
វឌ្ឍនភាព

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) progress, development, advancing

title: វឌ្ឍនភាព


text:
минерална вода

Noun

 * 1) mineral water

title: минерална вода


text:
undualized

Adjective

 * 1) Not dualized.

title: undualized


text: Kafue

title: Kafue


text:
ⲙⲏⲇⲟⲥ

Etymology
From,.

Noun

 * , person from Media.

title: ⲙⲏⲇⲟⲥ


text: Category:Latin terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (bear)


text:
unegregious

Adjective

 * 1) Not egregious.

title: unegregious


text: blindgangers

title: blindgangers


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/mahtijan

Etymology
From, equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  to empower, strengthen
 * 2)  to use force, act violently


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/unmahtijan

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to enfeeble, deprive of strength


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/mahtijaną

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to empower, to strengthen
 * 2) to use force, to act violently

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/mahtijaną


text:
unembezzled

Adjective

 * 1) Not embezzled.

title: unembezzled


text:
unengendered

Adjective

 * 1) Not engendered.

title: unengendered


text:
ігнорувати

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to ignore, to disregard deliberately pay no attention to

title: ігнорувати


text:
ගූථ

Declension
When masculine, the following three cases have some differences:

Etymology
..

title: ගූථ


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/keeltädäk

Etymology
Probably from.

Verb

 * 1) to forbid,  to disallow

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/keeltädäk


text: Ndola

title: Ndola


text: McCoyds

title: McCoyds


text:
unentomological

Adjective

 * 1) Not entomological.

title: unentomological


text:
T'u-men

Etymology
From  romanization: Tʻu³-mên².

Proper noun

 * 1)  (River)

title: T'u-men


text:
unepigrammatic

Adjective

 * 1) Not epigrammatic.

title: unepigrammatic


text:
unepitomized

Adjective

 * 1) Not epitomized.

title: unepitomized


text: recordhouders

title: recordhouders


text: Arkleys

title: Arkleys


text:
проігнорувати

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to ignore, to disregard deliberately pay no attention to

title: проігнорувати


text: Category:Old Norse terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (bear)


text: Category:Proto-Celtic terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (bear)


text:
Talk:сотка

It also has a colloquial meaning - a mobile phone, like short of сотовый > сотка. Kutkar (talk) 19:56, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:сотка


text: Category:Proto-Germanic terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (bear)


text: Category:Proto-Italic terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (bear)


text: Category:Proto-Celtic terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (ground)


text: Category:Latin terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *telh₂- (ground)


text:
អម្បូរ

Noun

 * : kin group, clan, tribe, family, lineage, race

title: អម្បូរ


text:
unequestrian

Adjective

 * 1) Not equestrian.

title: unequestrian


text:
unethnological

Adjective

 * 1) Not ethnological.

title: unethnological


text:
unetymologizable

Adjective

 * 1) Not etymologizable.

title: unetymologizable


text:
unethylated

Adjective

 * 1) Not ethylated.

title: unethylated


text:
unequated

Adjective

 * 1) Not equated.

title: unequated


text:
unequiangular

Adjective

 * 1) Not equiangular.

title: unequiangular


text:
Afrimești

Etymology
From.

title: Afrimești


text:
unequilateral

Adjective

 * 1) Not equilateral.

title: unequilateral


text:
Albinița

Etymology
From, definite form of.

title: Albinița


text:
unequalized

Adjective

 * 1) Not equalized.

title: unequalized


text:
unerroneous

Adjective

 * 1) Not erroneous.

title: unerroneous


text:
Borzontul Mare

Etymology
From +.

title: Borzontul Mare


text:
Borzontul Mic

Etymology
From +.

title: Borzontul Mic


text:
Buciușca

Etymology
From, definite form of.

title: Buciușca


text:
unexasperating

Adjective

 * 1) Not exasperating.

title: unexasperating


text:
Cucoara

Etymology
From, from , dialectal form of.

title: Cucoara


text:
Govodarva

Etymology
, from, from.

title: Govodarva


text:
מדלייה

Etymology
From, ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) A medal.

title: מדלייה


text:
Gurgui

Etymology
From.

title: Gurgui


text:
Jijioara

Etymology
From.

title: Jijioara


text:
Lăpușnicul Mic

Etymology
From +.

title: Lăpușnicul Mic


text:
Mădărașul Mare

Etymology
From +.

title: Mădărașul Mare


text:
Peștiș

Etymology
, from, from.

title: Peștiș


text: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/eːrn̩

title: Category:Rhymes:Norwegian Bokmål/eːrn̩


text:
Peștișani

Etymology
From.

title: Peștișani


text:
Suichow

Etymology
From the of.

title: Suichow


text:
Tomnatic

Etymology
From.

title: Tomnatic


text:
xamerlí

Etymology
From, an alteration of , in reference to the bird's sharp cry ( being a popular performance piece in the mediaeval Catalan Countries).

Noun

 * 1) stone-curlew

title: xamerlí


text:
Tălpășești

Etymology
From.

title: Tălpășești


text:
Țipăul Mare

Etymology
From +.

title: Țipăul Mare


text:
сценарій

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) scenario
 * 2) script text of a stage play, movie, or other performance
 * 3) screenplay

title: сценарій


text:
頭に浮かぶ

Etymology
🇰🇲

Verb

 * 1)  to come into mind, to pop into one's head

title: 頭に浮かぶ


text:
कुमक

Etymology
, from, from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬; 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) help, assistance, aid

title: कुमक


text: あたまにうかぶ

title: あたまにうかぶ


text:
torlit

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) stone-curlew

title: torlit


text: Barkleys

title: Barkleys


text:
unexcruciating

Adjective

 * 1) Not excruciating.

title: unexcruciating


text:
unexcogitated

Adjective

 * 1) Not excogitated.

title: unexcogitated


text:
頭に入れる

Etymology
Literally “to put in the head”.

Verb

 * 1)  to keep in mind

title: 頭に入れる


text:
unexorcisable

Adjective

 * 1) Not exorcisable.

title: unexorcisable


text:
unexpedited

Adjective

 * 1) Not expedited.

title: unexpedited


text: あたまにいれる

title: あたまにいれる


text:
hetlevrad

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) hot-blooded, irascible, choleric

title: hetlevrad


text:
calàndria

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) calandra lark

title: calàndria


text: hetlevrade

title: hetlevrade


text: hetlevrat

title: hetlevrat


text: ずけい

title: ずけい


text:
unexplicated

Adjective

 * 1) Not explicated.

title: unexplicated


text:
unexplorative

Adjective

 * 1) Not explorative.

title: unexplorative


text:
unexposable

Adjective

 * 1) Not exposable.

title: unexposable


text: Kildonan

title: Kildonan


text:
unexpoundable

Adjective

 * 1) Not expoundable.

title: unexpoundable


text:
unextricated

Adjective

 * 1) Not extricated.

title: unextricated


text:
unfeedable

Adjective

 * 1) Not feedable.

title: unfeedable


text:
unfellable

Adjective

 * 1) That cannot be felled.

title: unfellable


text: unfellowshiped

title: unfellowshiped


text: unfellowships

title: unfellowships


text: unfellowshipping

title: unfellowshipping


text: unfellowshiping

title: unfellowshiping


text: unfellowshipped

title: unfellowshipped


text:
unfeminize

Verb

 * 1)  To make unfeminine.

title: unfeminize


text: unfeminizing

title: unfeminizing


text: unfeminizes

title: unfeminizes


text:
Category talk:Hungarian terms spelled with ly

Similar categories that would be worth creating and populating: Hungarian terms spelled with dz, dzs, ch, x, y (excluding those containing only the digraphs gy, ly, ny, ty), q, w and possibly ty and ű, which are also rare. Adam78 (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

I just found there is Appendix:Hungarian words with dzs. Maybe this format is more suited to such a collection than a category. The category of ly words is rather deficient. Maybe it could be deleted and a comprehensive list in the appendix would suffice. Two means for the same purpose only ends in forking and double maintenance, so a single one would be better. ? Adam78 (talk) 12:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

 * Yes, I can edit each entry, remove the cln template, then delete this category. Originally, I created this category to follow the standard in English entries. I wanted to move all entries from the appendix to the category. But if you think the appendix is suited better, I can reverse it. Panda10 (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

 * My only problem with the category is that it may be too much trouble to populate and maintain, especially considering the fact that there are lots of compounds (altogether over 2000, e.g. around 300 containing hely, including those not yet entered) that would have to be added once their articles are created. An appendix can have links to terms that are not (yet) present in a category. On the other hand, is there any goal the existing appendix cannot accomplish but could be accomplished with a category? (Things like those mentioned here or here.) In practice, I'm not sure there is, but I may be wrong. Adam78 (talk) 12:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 * OK, I will work on cleaning up the entries and removing the category. Panda10 (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 * This is done. I will wait for a day and remove this talk page, as well. Panda10 (talk) 17:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 * Thank you very much. I think it's better to keep the discussion itself (in case the matter of having a category is raised again), so I've copied it to Appendix talk:Hungarian words with ly. There was content there already, that's why I didn't move it, which would have been more authentic. Maybe you as an admin can do something like merging the histories of two pages. (?) Adam78 (talk) 22:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 * We can keep this talk page. I don't know how to merge histories. Panda10 (talk) 17:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


text: Hadlocks

title: Hadlocks


text:
unfibrous

Adjective

 * 1) Not fibrous.

title: unfibrous


text:
unfickle

Adjective

 * 1) Not fickle.

title: unfickle


text:
unfictitious

Adjective

 * 1) Not fictitious.

title: unfictitious


text:
unfilamentous

Adjective

 * 1) Not filamentous.

title: unfilamentous


text:
unfissile

Adjective

 * 1) Not fissile.

title: unfissile


text:
мораторій

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) moratorium suspension of an ongoing activity
 * 2)  moratorium authorized suspension of payments

title: мораторій


text:
unflickeringly

Adverb

 * 1) Without flickering.

title: unflickeringly


text: πάσχεις

title: πάσχεις


text: πάσχει

title: πάσχει


text: πάσχετον

title: πάσχετον


text: πάσχομεν

title: πάσχομεν


text:
unfloggable

Adjective

 * 1) Not floggable.
 * 2) * '2006, Christian Ozim, The Miscreants (page 31)
 * Within a while the hostel master, Sir Kondo came with his cane and they quietly walked out of the hostel claiming to be unfloggable.

title: unfloggable


text: upon the point of

title: upon the point of


text: at the point of

title: at the point of


text: Mashonaland West

title: Mashonaland West


text: πάσχετε

title: πάσχετε


text: πάσχουσι

title: πάσχουσι


text: πάσχουσιν

title: πάσχουσιν


text:
unfoppish

Adjective

 * 1) Not foppish.

title: unfoppish


text:
unforeseeingly

Adverb

 * 1) Without foreseeing.

title: unforeseeingly


text:
unforfeitable

Adjective

 * 1) Not forfeitable.

title: unforfeitable


text:
unformulistic

Adjective

 * 1) Not formulistic.

title: unformulistic


text:
unfortifiable

Adjective

 * 1) Not fortifiable.

title: unfortifiable


text: Eagans

title: Eagans


text: πάσχῃς

title: πάσχῃς


text: πάσχῃ

title: πάσχῃ


text: πάσχωμεν

title: πάσχωμεν


text: πάσχητε

title: πάσχητε


text: meathló

title: meathló


text:
unfurbelowed

Adjective

 * 1) Without furbelows.

title: unfurbelowed


text: πάσχωσι

title: πάσχωσι


text:
unfurbished

Adjective

 * 1) Not furbished.

title: unfurbished


text: πάσχωσιν

title: πάσχωσιν


text:
unfurlable

Adjective

 * 1) Able to be unfurled.

Usage notes

 * Mainly used to describe a kind of antenna that can be launched into space and expand once there.

title: unfurlable


text:
ungenerative

Adjective

 * 1) Not generative.

title: ungenerative


text: πάσχοιμι

title: πάσχοιμι


text:
unglittering

Adjective

 * 1) That does not glitter.

title: unglittering


text: πάσχοις

title: πάσχοις


text:
unglistening

Adjective

 * 1) That does not glisten.

title: unglistening


text: πάσχοι

title: πάσχοι


text: πάσχοιμεν

title: πάσχοιμεν


text: πάσχοιτε

title: πάσχοιτε


text:
сенарник

Noun

 * 1) hayloft (upper storey of a barn used for storing hay)

title: сенарник


text: πάσχοιεν

title: πάσχοιεν


text: πάσχε

title: πάσχε


text: πασχέτω

title: πασχέτω


text:
ungraphitized

Adjective

 * 1) Not graphitized.

title: ungraphitized


text:
ungnostic

Adjective

 * 1) Not gnostic.

title: ungnostic


text:
ungrindable

Adjective

 * 1) Not grindable.

title: ungrindable


text:
ungravelly

Adjective

 * 1) Not gravelly.

title: ungravelly


text: πάσχουσα

title: πάσχουσα


text: Category:Rhymes:English/ɪskɪt

title: Category:Rhymes:English/ɪskɪt


text:
müverrih

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) historian

title: müverrih


text: πάσχουσ'

title: πάσχουσ'


text: πάσχον

title: πάσχον


text:
corniol

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) columbine

title: corniol


text: Yarwoods

title: Yarwoods


text: πείσῃ

title: πείσῃ


text: πείσει

title: πείσει


text: πείσεται

title: πείσεται


text:
léaró

Etymology
Extension of.

Noun

 * 1) glimmer, gleam, glint

title: léaró


text: πεισόμεθα

title: πεισόμεθα


text: πείσεσθε

title: πείσεσθε


text: πείσονται

title: πείσονται


text: πείσοιτο

title: πείσοιτο


text: πεισοίμεθα

title: πεισοίμεθα


text:
одноповерховий

Etymology
From.

title: одноповерховий


text: πείσοιντο

title: πείσοιντο


text:
Talk:minchia

Italian/Sicilian
Just made an edit under Italian, it could be a Sicilian sense, though... can't really tell sometimes when Sicilians speak Italian. 2001:1C02:190D:6300:CC58:464:C289:5CA5 21:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:minchia


text:
sanguinyol

Etymology
, diminutive of, from the reddish colour of the leaves and stems in fall and winter.

Noun

 * 1) common dogwood

title: sanguinyol


text: πεισόμενος

title: πεισόμενος


text: πεισομένη

title: πεισομένη


text: πεισόμενον

title: πεισόμενον


text:
corneller

Etymology
From, diminutive of , from.

Noun

 * 1) cornel
 * 2) dogwood

title: corneller


text: ἔπαθες

title: ἔπαθες


text: Category:ca:Cornales order plants

title: Category:ca:Cornales order plants


text:
үлсәү

Etymology
From, from.

Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to measure
 * 2) to weigh

Noun

 * 1) scales, balance

title: үлсәү


text: ἔπαθε

title: ἔπαθε


text: ἔπαθεν

title: ἔπαθεν


text: Shamva

title: Shamva


text: ἐπάθομεν

title: ἐπάθομεν


text: ἐπάθετε

title: ἐπάθετε


text:
hortènsia

Etymology
From the former genus name, Hortensia.

Noun

 * 1) hydrangea

title: hortènsia


text:
Afeléift

Etymology

 * Possibly from.

Noun

 * 1)  idolatry

title: Afeléift


text:
unguentiferous

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  Yielding an unguent.

title: unguentiferous


text:
unguilefully

Adverb

 * 1) Without guile.

title: unguilefully


text:
unguiltily

Adverb

 * 1) Without guilt.

title: unguiltily


text:
ungushing

Adjective

 * 1) Not gushing.

title: ungushing


text:
unhamper

Verb

 * 1)  To free from hindrances.

title: unhamper


text: unhampering

title: unhampering


text: unhampers

title: unhampers


text: Mashonaland Central

title: Mashonaland Central


text:
Afouer

Etymology

 * Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  import

title: Afouer


text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2021-08/Nullifying the previous templates vote

Additional clarification to "nullify"
I'm thinking of adding the following to clarify the term "nullify," in line with and 's comments at the BP:

"To nullify is to render unenforceable, as if the original vote never took place to begin with. If the vote passes, the interpretation that prior lack of consensus forbids the usage of the two new templates will be invalidated. Absent a future RFD decision, anyone will be able to use the templates. But no one will ever be required to."

I'm adding this to the talk page first just to see if anyone else wants to phrase it better or differently. Imetsia (talk) 21:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * some questions here: 1) If we lost this vote, then finally we lose the templates? No chance of their usage? 2) If we win, then the opposition wouldn't be able to say "using these is a violation of the original vote"? If the original vote failed, how can we expect this to pass? The opposers are so stubborn that  is impossible. I am sure no opposer of the previous vote would support here. Svārtava2 • 08:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * (1) Yes, if we lose the vote, we lose the templates. They probably won't be deleted, but other users will be empowered (or at least able) to revert their usage. I think at that point, we'd have to try other votes (just the bor+ template itself, mandating and standardizing the "Borrowed from"/"Inherited from" language as PUC has suggested, etc.). However, I don't want to flood Wiktionary with a flurry of votes that get at basically the same thing. So I think it'd be best at that point to wait a while before moving forward with that.
 * (2) To the first question, yes, that's exactly right. Second, the way this vote passes is by hoping on two things: that some of the prior opposition will vote in a principled way AND that we can increase turnout. I think many of our admins are principled. Some, I hope, will be able to vote in favor here even if they personally dislike the templates. Just out of the conviction that the templates never needed a vote. But more than that, there are some somewhat dormant/inactive users that I think we can move to action. Already, I can think of Gnosandes and Rishabhbhat off the top of my head, and hopefully there are a few others. Imetsia (talk) 17:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * yep. But I am not inactive, I mostly work on Kashmiri Wiktionary. Rishabhbhat (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned in Beer Parlour before the vote started, yea I didn't think that (2) was seriously going to happen at all, and we're already seeing the opposite happen, I doubt that many people if anyone will switch sides to support. It's messy, it's not a good look, and it will more than likely hurt future votes such as one specifically for bor+. AG202 (talk) 16:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Is this vote necessary?
Is this vote necessary? The heart of the matter is whether in etymology sections the phrases borrowed from and inherited from should be expressly used or not. Why not have a discussion about that instead? Everything else flows from that. — SGconlaw (talk) 07:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

 * I do agree to an extent. I hadn't thought of the idea when I created the vote, but PUC pointed it out at the BP discussion afterwards. Had someone suggested so before I started the vote, we might instead have discussed a vote about including the phrases "borrowed from" and "inherited from" expressly.
 * Even then, however, that seems like a harder proposition, given our previous Votes/2017-06/borrowing,_borrowed. From a strategy perspective, this vote might be a better option if it has greater chances of succeeding than a vote to incorporate the phrases expressly. This is all speculative though, which is why I wouldn't change course with it in midstream. Imetsia (talk) 14:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

No consensus result?
What happens if this vote ends up in a no consensus result? Would we stick with the status quo of there being no consensus on the usage of the templates? Would there actually be a discussion on how to use them? I'm a little confused as to what would happen. AG202 (talk) 02:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would preserve the status quo. One would hope that the instigators of this vote will then be forced to hold discussions about whether we actually want our entries to display text, and in what situations, and said discussions may actually bring us to a consensus. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 02:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * "no consensus of usage of the templates" but still they'll be kept, right, since they passed RFDO? Per RFD if these templates are kept, is it really so necessary to go replacing these templates? Think about it, this vote was created just because of you, your non-cooperation. Since you support bor+, can you please stop replacing it? What about a compromise: inh+ is not used (or deleted), (a decision I personally have don't like), bor+ is not replaced? You might also want to see User:SodhakSH/Votes/2021-06/Having consistent wording for etymology templates for other options and give feedback on them. Svārtava2 • 04:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the response! Yeah, hopefully something can be reached about this. It's frustrating to have it be in constant limbo. AG202 (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


text: Afoueren

title: Afoueren


text: Category:Rhymes:English/ɒsɪti

title: Category:Rhymes:English/ɒsɪti


text:
unhafted

Adjective

 * 1) Without a haft or handle.

title: unhafted


text:
unharangued

Adjective

 * 1) Not harangued.

title: unharangued


text:
unhailable

Adjective

 * 1) Not hailable.

title: unhailable


text:
hailable

Adjective

 * 1) Able to be hailed.
 * a hailable taxi service

title: hailable


text:
unhatchability

Noun

 * 1) The property of being unhatchable.

title: unhatchability


text:
Talk:λίς

 * see hebrew word: (pr.) - layish
 * ליש

2800:484:781:D8C4:6D71:F9BB:86B9:EF1B 21:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:λίς


text:
unhidable

Adjective

 * 1) That cannot be hidden.

title: unhidable


text:
unhomologous

Adjective

 * 1) Not homologous.

title: unhomologous


text:
Abraomas

Proper noun

 * 1) Abraham biblical character.

title: Abraomas


text:
Baltramiejus

Proper noun

 * 1) Bartholomew.

title: Baltramiejus


text:
unhousewifely

Adjective

 * 1) Not housewifely.

title: unhousewifely


text: Edmundas

title: Edmundas


text:
Gabrielius

Proper noun

 * 1) Gabriel biblical character.

title: Gabrielius


text: Motiejus

title: Motiejus


text:
unhopple

Verb

 * 1)  To free (an animal) from a hopple.

title: unhopple


text: unhoppling

title: unhoppling


text: unhopples

title: unhopples


text: Pranciškus

title: Pranciškus


text:
unhoppled

Adjective

 * 1) Not hoppled.

title: unhoppled


text: Zacharijas

title: Zacharijas


text: Vaidotas

title: Vaidotas


text: Donaldas

title: Donaldas


text:
Jeremijas

Proper noun

 * 1) Jeremiah biblical character.

title: Jeremijas


text: Anastazija

title: Anastazija


text: Dorotėja

title: Dorotėja


text: Petronelė

title: Petronelė


text: Gražutė

title: Gražutė


text: Vytautė

title: Vytautė


text: Stefanija

title: Stefanija


text: Genovaitė

title: Genovaitė


text: Konstancija

title: Konstancija


text:
unhumid

Adjective

 * 1) Not humid.

title: unhumid


text:
unhumbugged

Adjective

 * 1) Not humbugged.

title: unhumbugged


text:
unhuntable

Adjective

 * 1) Not huntable.

title: unhuntable


text:
Akvilė

Related terms

 * , the masculine form.

title: Akvilė


text: Felicija

title: Felicija


text:
Mount Hampden

Proper noun

 * , named after.

title: Mount Hampden


text:
unidealist

Noun

 * 1) One who is not an idealist.

title: unidealist


text: unidealists

title: unidealists


text: Unifolium

title: Unifolium


text:
unignominious

Adjective

 * 1) Not ignominious.

title: unignominious


text:
unimolecularity

Noun

 * 1) The property of being unimolecular.

title: unimolecularity


text:
unimpatient

Adjective

 * 1) Not impatient.

title: unimpatient


text:
unindustrial

Adjective

 * 1) Not industrial.

title: unindustrial


text:
uninquisitorial

Adjective

 * 1) Not inquisitorial.

title: uninquisitorial


text:
uninsinuated

Adjective

 * 1) Not insinuated.

title: uninsinuated


text:
uninsultable

Adjective

 * 1) Not insultable.

title: uninsultable


text:
unintensive

Adjective

 * 1) Not intensive.

title: unintensive


text:
uninterlocked

Adjective

 * 1) Not interlocked.

title: uninterlocked


text:
uninterlinked

Adjective

 * 1) Not interlinked.

title: uninterlinked


text:
uninterwoven

Adjective

 * 1) Not interwoven.

title: uninterwoven


text:
unisexed

Adjective

 * 1) unisex

title: unisexed


text:
uniridescent

Adjective

 * 1) Not iridescent.

title: uniridescent


text: unitarisms

title: unitarisms


text:
universeful

Noun

 * 1) Enough to fill a universe.

title: universeful


text: universefuls

title: universefuls


text:
kemirmek

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to gnaw

title: kemirmek


text:
unjesuitical

Adjective

 * 1) Not jesuitical.

title: unjesuitical


text:
unknotty

Adjective

 * 1) Not knotty.

title: unknotty


text:
Yàlla

Etymology
Borrowed from. The vocative meaning was lost.

Proper noun

 * 1) God

title: Yàlla


text:
unkerchiefed

Adjective

 * 1) Not wearing a kerchief.

title: unkerchiefed


text:
univerbal

Adjective

 * 1) Consisting of a single word.

title: univerbal


text: Category:ca:Larks

title: Category:ca:Larks


text:
fedda

Noun

 * 1) slice

Verb

 * 1)  to finish
 * 2)  to come to an agreement, to conclude
 * 3)  to give up, to abandon

title: fedda


text:
童貞女

Noun

 * 1) female virgin

title: 童貞女


text: 童贞女

title: 童贞女


text:
двоповерховий

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) double-decker
 * 1) double-decker

title: двоповерховий


text:
Zunyi

Etymology
From the romanization of the.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:

title: Zunyi


text: quagliu

title: quagliu


text:
quagghiu

Noun

 * 1) rennet

title: quagghiu


text:
tirminali

Noun

 * 1) terminal of an airport, train station, etc.

title: tirminali


text:
Raw

Etymology
Topographic surname for someone who lived at a hedgerow or at a row of houses, from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Raw is the 60347th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 334 individuals. Raw is most common among White (86.53%) individuals.

title: Raw


text: ciranna

title: ciranna


text: girana

title: girana


text: giuranna

title: giuranna


text: sancu

title: sancu


text:
miritari

Verb

 * 1) to deserve, to merit

title: miritari


text:
cotoliu

Noun

 * 1) woodlark

title: cotoliu


text:
ciminu

Noun

 * 1) cumin

title: ciminu


text: ciminàuru

title: ciminàuru


text:
vulari

Verb

 * 1) to fly

title: vulari


text: abbulari

title: abbulari


text:
màgicu

Noun

 * 1) magic

title: màgicu


text: màggicu

title: màggicu


text:
cecu

Noun

 * 1) Czech inhabitant of Czechia
 * 2) Czech language

title: cecu


text:
cavigghia

Noun

 * 1) ankle

title: cavigghia


text:
Sui-ning

Etymology
From  romanization: Sui⁴-ning².

title: Sui-ning


text: populazioni

title: populazioni


text: populazzioni

title: populazzioni


text: pupulazioni

title: pupulazioni


text:
oziu

Noun

 * 1) idleness

title: oziu


text: ozziu

title: ozziu


text:
unsimultaneous

Adjective

 * 1) Not simultaneous.

title: unsimultaneous


text: oluri

title: oluri


text:
unsketchable

Adjective

 * 1) Not sketchable.

title: unsketchable


text:
unslammed

Adjective

 * 1) Not having been slammed.

title: unslammed


text: Luanshya

title: Luanshya


text:
unslippery

Adjective

 * 1) Not slippery.

title: unslippery


text:
friggideri

Noun

 * 1) refrigerator

title: friggideri


text:
unsociological

Adjective

 * 1) Not sociological.

title: unsociological


text:
unsoggy

Adjective

 * 1) Not soggy.

title: unsoggy


text:
unsolidifiable

Adjective

 * 1) Not solidifiable.

title: unsolidifiable


text:
unsneering

Adjective

 * 1) Not sneering.

title: unsneering


text:
eine Schippe drauflegen

Etymology
Originally referring to the coals used to drive trains. One also says, , in Austria ,.

Verb

 * 1)  to make an additional effort

title: eine Schippe drauflegen


text: eine Schüppe drauflegen

title: eine Schüppe drauflegen


text: Chingola

title: Chingola