text:
Talk:quarter of

RFD discussion: April 2020–March 2021
Per Talk:twenty-five to. The appropriate sense is already at of. Ultimateria (talk) 19:13, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete or maybe redirect to quarter. —(((Romanophile))) ♞ (contributions) 10:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - TheDaveRoss  13:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. PUC – 20:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep; the use in the following seems peculiar to me as a non-native speaker: 'I need twenty minutes to get to the shop." "You'll be late. It's already a quarter of."' In M-W (WT:LEMMING). These deletions of useful entries surely are not making the dictionary any better. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dan. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  13:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. ibid. --Kent Dominic (talk) 09:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. Quarter of an hour + a known sense of of, clear in context. Fay Freak (talk) 14:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. --幽霊四 (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per the lemming principle. Khemehekis (talk) 11:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Younger people don't know what this is and are likely to look it up in a dictionary when encountering it an older source. "At a quarter of the first platoon moved out." Facts707 (talk) 10:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

No consensus to delete and none likely to emerge. This has been open for almost a year and the "look" template had been applied for a month and a half. Purplebackpack89 14:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:quarter of


text:
Talk:get ready

RFD discussion: November 2020–March 2021
SOP. Translations can be moved to prepare. Benwing2 (talk) 00:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep as a set phrase. bd2412 T 01:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I just find it sad that this would even be a candidate to be tossed out of a dictionary. -- Dentonius (my politics | talk) 10:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Has a sense that is idiomatic enough, IMO, though it could be debatable whether the present article captures this completely perfectly. The weaker sense, exemplified by "I'll get the tripod ready", can go along for the ride I suppose, so as to avoid a slightly anal "&lit" solution, so Keep.

RFD kept — Dentonius 10:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Reopened and delete. Get ready for trouble. ;) ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * LBD, it's your right to do that. But I'm just curious, why? How do you and your brethren feel after you succeed in getting a perfectly informative and useful entry removed from this dictionary? As long as it's not yours, it's okay, right? — Dentonius 20:56, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I find this pointless duplication of content, because get + adjective can be used to productively form potentially ergative verb phrases: get smart, get happy, get pregnant, get stoned. That said, I am baffled to see that M-W has an entry for this (and Collins mentioned it at make ready). ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  16:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 20:51, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Lemmings say keep. See . DCDuring (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

 * RFD-kept (for real this time, after Dentonius's inappropriate closure). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:get ready


text:
Talk:get outta

RFD discussion: November 2020–March 2021
Redundant to outta. Benwing2 (talk) 00:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I think a hard redirect is justified here. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with Lingo Bingo Dingo. Not enough there for an entry, but is a plausible search term.Facts707 (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirected. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:get outta


text:
Talk:get one's money's worth

RFD discussion: November 2020–March 2021
Redundant to money's worth. Benwing2 (talk) 03:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

 * On the one hand, this one appears to be replaceable (instances of, e.g., "receive one's money's worth" are attested), but this form does appear in the Cambridge Dictionary. bd2412 T 01:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep -- Dentonius (my politics | talk) 10:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Any particular reason? DCDuring (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

 * This seems a common form for money's worth, however. Turn it into a hard redirect. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hard redirect per LBD. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. reveals 2 lemmings. DCDuring (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hard redirect. Ultimateria (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep, this is most common variation of the phrase Vininn126 12:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Hard redirect as per Lingo Bingo. The trouble I have with all these "get" something entries is that generally, as here, you can substitute "be" "are" "am" "is" "got" "had" "have" etc. with no change in overall meaning. Facts707 (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Hard redirect per others. —Mahāgaja · talk 16:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Agreed, hard redirect. Imetsia (talk) 16:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirected. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:get one's money's worth


text:
Talk:George Washington

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021
A compound name - no more entryworthy than Mary-Anne, John-Joe, Day-Lewis Calvert-Lewin. La más guay (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

 * And we might want to visit some of these in other language too, like Jean-Claude, Marie-Louise, Jose Maria, José María. La más guay (talk) 22:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Note: Moved the RFD tag to the Proper noun section, since the noun is not up for deletion. PseudoSkull (talk) 00:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * In that case, rfd-sense is appropriate. DonnanZ (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete (keep any hyphenated form) SemperBlotto (talk) 10:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

 * On one hand, it seems to function as a unit at least some of the time; on the other hand, so do "double" surnames, and at Talk:Dufour-Lapointe (and Talk:Cavalier-Smith and Talk:Bromley-Davenport) we determined to delete those. Talk:Marie-Therese was kept, but it is at least hyphenated; Talk:Billy Jean and Billy Bob exist but so do unspaced versions which COALMINEd them in. Does this ever exist as Georgewashington? It wouldn't surprise me if some children in India had been given that name, given other Anglo-namesmash names I've seen, but I'm not finding any. Does it ever exist as George-Washington? Again, wouldn't surprise me. But as it stands, weak delete. - -sche (discuss) 19:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It's just a combo of the first and middle name; some people just prefer to be referred to by their first and middle instead of just their first. You could make up any number of middle names, though, and by extension also middle-first combos. Someone named " DeLongpre" might just refer to be called "Allen Gregory" instead of just "Allen", but that doesn't mean "Allen Gregory" has any lexical significance. That a middle name happened to be named after a last name (in this case Washington from the historical figure George Washington) doesn't matter that much, because middle names are not lexically significant as middle names any case I've ever heard of; they're usually just taken from surnames to begin with. PseudoSkull (talk) 19:23, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

 * It is a unit in some way (people aren't called Washington George or even Anne-Mary) but I don't know. The individual parts just mean their normal meaning. Equinox ◑ 20:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I think in this respect, it's more like a collocation than a lexical unit. We also don't say "do an exam" (at least not in most places), but that doesn't make "take an exam" entry-worthy under our current CFI. Delete. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 21:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

 * I think this is a delete. To be an entry there needs to be some established further meaning. Take John Hancock as a valid entry example. -- A LGRIF  talk 21:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a compound first name. Ultimateria (talk) 18:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete, just SOP. Although John Hancock has an entry to refer to a signature. Facts707 (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:George Washington


text:
Talk:have the time of one's life

RFD discussion: May 2020–March 2021
Since this tends to be used to mean "to experience the greatest time in one's life", I suggest that this may be simply the sum of its parts. Tharthan (talk) 23:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Move this one to per Lambiam's and TheDaveRoss' reasoning below. Not only does it sound idiomatic/set-phrase enough to my ears, but it's also supported by (non-binding) WT:LEMMING . Imetsia (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Move to the lemma, just as two of those "lemmings" do. It can be used with other verbs (e.g. it was the time of my life) and with it is SOP. Redirect from the have version. -  TheDaveRoss  13:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

 * I think is the idiomatic core: “this will be the time of your life”; “I would be anticipating the time of my life”; ”The time of my life. Yes—but what sort of time? The time when I did my best work—or what I thought was the best? [... The time of my life which was at once the most enjoyable and the most decisive for my future ...”]. It may even be argued that “time” is replaceable: ”the experience of my life”; ”the disappointment of my life”; ”the discovery of his life”. That suggests . Alternatively, if it can be established that “time” is the original greatest something of someone’s lifetime, these alterations can be analyzed as snowclones.  --Lambiam 13:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merriam-Webster has an entry for . PUC – 14:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Move per TheDaveRoss and possibly make this a redirect. Equinox ◑ 23:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to, or is there's no consensus for the former option. PUC – 14:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep as is. - Dentonius (my politics | talk) 15:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Move to . Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Moved to time of one's life. bd2412 T 04:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:have the time of one's life


text:
Talk:beaver eater

RFD discussion: June 2020–March 2021
Sum of parts; we cover oral sex at eat (whereas with I suppose one could at least argue that gobble doesn't cover it). This is one of PaM's entries; he obsessively created loads of stuff about Islam and lesbians. "Especially a lesbian" in this definition also seems irrelevant to the term, just perhaps a general truth about sexual habits (or may well be wrong altogether). In Google Books I found a reference to "guys eating beaver", strengthening the idea that this is SoP. Equinox ◑ 22:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * and Bernd Brandes were literal cock gobblers, as was a disgruntled Indonesian gardener. There are, of course, also literal beaver eaters. --Lambiam 09:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obviously entered by a sad individual. DonnanZ (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - TheDaveRoss  13:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is confirmed as sufficiently a set phrase -- I scarcely wish to check -- then I would support keeping it. I think that hints buried at eat and beaver, that must be put together in the right combination, may not allow people to confidently understand what is meant when they encounter this expression, if that is what it is. Mihia (talk) 22:54, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I have heard or seen the phrase with the specific connotation that the eater is a lesbian, but not recently. Google books finds The Concise New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English with the hyphenated form beaver-eater and a gender-neutral definition.  An older work describes 'beaver eater' as a term for a wolverine, which eats Castor.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Added wolverine definition, so only delete the slang sense if the RFD says delete. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Google scholar(!) finds a use that sounds like a word in New Insights into Gendered Discursive Practices quoting a Facebook interaction between two teenage girls. Girl 1 writes on Facebook: "You don't know me".  Girl 2 replies: "I know you're a beaver eater".  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The sexual meaning is probably dominant these days among the possible senses. Non-durable pages also refer to it as slang for French Canadians; that's worth following up.  Some commentaries on the novel Lolita mentions the term beaver eater appearing.  Others say it wasn't a double entendre when Nabokob wrote it 65 years ago.  If it's a borderline case for inclusion I can look for a durable quotation about this interpretation.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 23:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Added a few more uses of the sexual sense to the citation page. I think its inclusion in the Partridge Dictionary strongly supports the argument that it has become a set phrase, fitting into the pattern of synonymous terms like, or . – Einstein2 (talk) 10:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep - Dentonius (my politics | talk) 16:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep - not sum of parts (removed "especially a lesbian") SemperBlotto (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep, senses wolverine and Canadian aren't SOP. Sense cunnilinguist looks SOP-ish though. --幽霊四 (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Kept. bd2412 T 07:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:beaver eater


text:
Talk:retire early

RFD discussion: November 2020–March 2021
SOP. Darren X. Thorsson (talk) 00:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Probably held by WT:THUB; all such terms (this in English and translations if they are of multiple words) have idiomatic character, because this is a particular concept people talk about – and you would like to know how this is said in other languages. Fay Freak (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Looking at retire, every sense that is intransitive could have "early" added to it, plus at least one that's listed as transitive ("I need to retire my car. You're going to retire early?"). I'd use "retire early" to refer to to going to bed before one would normally do so. I don't see it as particularly idiomatic; it's just to retire + early.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

 * I don't really see the value in this unless it is phrasebook-worthy. Certainly it's SoP because you're just doing something early i.e. before the time prescribed. Equinox ◑ 07:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly SOP as it's just two senses of retire + early. PseudoSkull (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

 * How do we feel about ' and '? —Mahāgaja · talk 17:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WT:THUB. I don't like the policy, but I have to accept its legitimacy. Imetsia (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. It looks like many of the translations are off and don't support THUB. Imetsia (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

 * If is kept because it is a medical entity, then  has to be kept because it is a legal entity. Fay Freak (talk) 02:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I would certainly probably keep . I'm less convinced about (abstain), and much less convinced about  (delete). Also, the French translations  are incorrect: both are transitive verbs, and they don't translate the intransitive senses given in the entry. The correct translations  don't support THUB. (Presumably, the same goes for other Romance languages.) PUC – 13:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * (, what about Italian?) PUC – 13:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The Italian is also transitive, not to mention very rare (some dictionaries didn't even include it, others marked it as rare). Imetsia (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * In fairness, the definition originally given in the entry was transitive, "retire someone [early]", which I changed because AFAICT the main use is in reference to people who retire early (intransitive), not to companies retiring their workers early (transitive), but perhaps I should've simply added the intransitive sense while leaving the transitive sense. Would the (to my ear weirder) transitive sense meet THUB? Weird... - -sche (discuss) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Comment. I am finding it hard to see why we would treat early retirement any differently from retire early. Mihia (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per PUC. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 18:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per arguments above. And the participles are all wrong. Facts707 (talk) 17:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:retire early


text:
Talk:-gest-

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021
Nonsensical as an interfix. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 16:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

-stan-
Ditto. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 17:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Other affixes to review here. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 17:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete because there are no words using them. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 17:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete them all, although we need to look more closely at etymology for words such as, the middle section apparently comes from . DonnanZ (talk) 21:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  12:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all. PUC – 22:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * All RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:-gest-


text:
Talk:mathematical markup language

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021
SOP 120.150.121.92 12:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * This is SOP because the definition is incorrect. LaTeX is a mathematical markup language, but it does not use XML. 120.150.121.92 12:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Adjective + noun + noun is always a hard sell. I'll abstain. If I see decent arguments from other corners, I'll take another look. — Dentonius 12:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I will stand up for this term. Keep. utility > idiomaticity; lemmings (other dictionaries have it)., do you as the creator want to keep your entry? I did a quick search to see which paper dictionaries have it, lo and behold, they do. Here's one printed dictionary. Here's another. There are more. If paper can do it, why can't we? — Dentonius 06:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Those dictionaries have it in caps. That is evidence for an entry, not for this entry. 120.150.121.92 01:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's the expansion of the name of a specific markup language,, incorrectly written with lower case.  If the definition were broad enough to include TeX it would be a sum of parts.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, incorrectly defined, and if correctly defined hopelessly SOP:  geological markup language,  medical markup language,  music markup language, ... While “MathML” is formed as a semi-initialism from ”mathematical markup language”, the latter is not a lexical unit but a transparent sum of parts, just like the proper noun is kind of an acronym for “if you see what I mean”, while the full phrase is not a lexical unit, if you grok what I signify.  --Lambiam 01:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete with Lambiam. Fay Freak (talk) 14:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:mathematical markup language


text:
Talk:Arbër Highway

RFD discussion: November 2020–March 2021
I don't think this is dictionary material. Most of the named road entries we have either have cultural significance or other meanings of some kind. I'm fully aware that this vote will probably set a precedent, though. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 13:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * We have an earlier (still unresolved) RfD for Ludgate Hill. --Lambiam 22:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete. The definition contains nothing relevant to a dictionary. People can look in Wikipedia for this. Mihia (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Dunno. You could argue it does have historical significance following an ancient caravan route. We have the, maybe we should add the for instance. DonnanZ (talk) 12:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I was curious whether WT:CFI had anything to say about this, and this is what I found: "The editors have not yet reached a consensus as to whether or not the names of places and geographic features other than those listed above should be included in Wiktionary. [...] It is hoped that the editors will develop criteria over time to provide greater clarity and address matters not currently covered (for example the names of streets, buildings, tunnels)." Wonder if there should be a discussion about this. — SGconlaw (talk) 13:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * We should, and while this is not the spot to have it, let me nevertheless fire a first shot. However its precise formulation, the criterion for inclusion should be similar to that for entities from fictional universes. If the term is referenced outside the context of its geolocation, signifying instead a connotation attached to the geoname, it counts in favour of inclusion. For an example, here a deceased character is described as being elegant, even in death, for wearing a bespoke “Savile Row tweed suit”. We do in fact have an entry “Savile Row”; it should be kept. For an example in the other direction, the reference here to Yavuz Selim Caddesi does not count. For that street name to merit inclusion, it needs other attestations. --Lambiam 13:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I entirely agree. There may be some wrinkles to be ironed out in the detail, but essentially I think you are right: we shouldn't include place names, street names etc. just to note that these exist and to describe their type and geographically where they are, e.g. "town in X", "unincorporated community in ", "road between X and Y", etc. There needs to be some additional non-geographical content, such as, just as you say, noting the conventional association between "Savile Row" and tailoring. I think this idea should be worked into proposed wording for the CFI, and we should vote on it. Mihia (talk) 14:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC) While trying to research how many place/street names in the world, I stumbled upon this. Ha ha!
 * Lovely Bottom (in Tasmania) sounds even more intriguing than ... DonnanZ (talk) 16:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * just to be clear, you are proposing this for geographical locations other than the ones already listed at WT:CFI (for which there was consensus for inclusion following a formal vote), right? — SGconlaw (talk) 06:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * For me, no, not necessarily. For instance, I do not agree that we should list "The names of towns, villages and hamlets" where there is no non-geographical information to include, such as the long list of tiny places at Moscow, and I would vote to overturn that decision if there was the opportunity. I would not oppose keeping a contained number of "large" or "important" geographical entities, fsdo "large" and "important". Mihia (talk) 10:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I only meant to address currently unresolved issues, focussing on named roadways. I have not given thought to buildings (Flatiron Building), bridges (George Washington Bridge), monuments (Lincoln Memorial), and other named geographic entities or landmarks. In general, the name needs to have a meaning that extends beyond the immediate one. I agree with Mihia, though, that the current status that allows the inclusion of the name of any attested hamlet is ill advised and should be revised; it would be best to have criteria that are uniform (mutatis mutandis) across different species of named specific entities. (There was a time when the rule of the English Wikipedia was that all schools, however non-notable, could be included. Predictably, that proved untenable.) --Lambiam 11:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * As I've said in a number of times, the problem with including this sort of thing is that we have no notability requirement like Wikipedia does. If we include Main Street for a large city, we can't stop someone from adding it for every city and town in the United States. What's more, they all meet our attestation requirements because legal records are, by definition, durably archived, and so are many local newspapers, directories, maps, etc. Addresses are an important part of daily life- just try and find anything on Google Books that doesn't have one or two.
 * For those who say that Wiktionary is not paper, that just means the limitations are different. An entry is a web page, and a database record, and it takes processor time and memory and network/disk access to display it. It also has users who have limits to how much they want to scroll though to find things.
 * For those who say that no one will bother to add all that stuff: there are compulsive people out there, and they have computers. For instance, I've had edits that added every single permutation of affixes for gender, number, size, etc. for a single word in a single language to translation tables. There are people who spend hours a day week in, week out, adding the same thing to every single entry. We have people who won't allow cognates from certain languages without adding one from their own. I could go on, but I'm not one of those people.
 * So far, the only way we've kept things sane is to limit classes of things. If we keep expanding what we allow, we'll eventually have to come up with notability requirements so that we can have the Mississippi river but not Bedbug Run in my mom's home town in Iowa. Chuck Entz (talk) 16:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure whether we should (or even want to) go down the route of actually revisiting the place names policy (see "Votes/pl-2017-01/Policy on place names" and "Votes/pl-2017-03/CFI and place names cleanup", which I didn't participate in) entirely, but here are some of my thoughts (sorry for the slight randomness):
 * Personally, I have no objection if we just stick to what was previously agreed in 2017 and exclude other geographical features such as the "names of streets, buildings, tunnels" mentioned in WT:CFI.
 * I'm not entirely sure how a notability requirement for place names would apply. I have a sneaking feeling that it may not be too difficult to find, say, three mentions of a place in local newspapers.
 * Is it justifiable to say that some places only merit inclusion because they have a different connotation (like Savile Row or Wall Street), while no such limitation applies to other places (like Greenland)?
 * Assuming we are revisiting the entire place names policy, for inhabited places I wonder if an admittedly arbitrary rule like "all places with a population less than 1,000 people should be excluded" would work. However, this would exclude some places like Pitcairn Island (population in 2020 estimated at 50), unless we say that islands are excluded from this rule (and would there be a basis for doing so?). Also: (1) What would we regard as reliable sources for determining the population of a place? (2) This would not help to decide if places like "streets, buildings, tunnels" should be included.
 * This isn't directly related to the discussion, but maybe we should start requiring editors to provide co-ordinates for places. I have to say that it isn't very helpful to be told that Rockville, among other things, is "[a] city in Minnesota", "[a] town in Utah", and "[a] village in Nebraska".
 * — SGconlaw (talk) 16:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You're raising a lot of points. Re co-ordinates, Fay Freak raised the same point for Moscow below, I have always regarded them too cumbersome to include for latitude and longitude - they can be often found in Wikipedia articles. But I do include British Ordnance Survey grid references, which are more compact. The situation with Rockville is due to the entry's creator - I think which county each one is in could be added.
 * Regarding islands, I think the general rule is to only include inhabited ones, but that rule can be bent -, inhabited only by seabirds, has found its way in, and may include both inhabited and uninhabited islands, I added the NZ island because it made the news a while back. DonnanZ (talk) 12:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, on the "no one will bother to add all that stuff" point ... why would we even have a policy to admit all place names in the world if we did not aspire to eventually achieving complete coverage, i.e. including all hundred million of them, or however many it is? It wouldn't make any sense to allow types of entries on the assumption that no one will ever bother to add them. Mihia (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

 * On the subject of roads in particular when there is no figurative meaning, we should not include road names that are combinations of names or adjectives with words meaning road.  + .   + .   + .   is borderline because it doesn't have any English words.   can have a road name sense because it is spelled without a space, but only as a generic term and not as any specific instances of Broadway (merge the Manhattan road sense into the theater district sense).  So Delete the nominated term.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete. I am tentatively inclined to agree with the Savile Row criterion proposed above, and this seems to fail it. Even if we don't favor that criterion, this still seems to not be the kind of thing for a dictionary to cover, any more than e.g. covering recent books like Divergent or New Moon. - -sche (discuss) 04:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * So essentially the geographical locations listed in WT:CFI may be included without any requirement of an independent connotation (the Savile Row and Wall Street examples), but any other location – be it a bridge, building, street or tunnel – may only be included if there is an independent connotation? — SGconlaw (talk) 09:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * IMO, as I wrote above already, it would be best to have criteria that are uniform (mutatis mutandis) across different species of named specific entities. Our criteria are formed in a somewhat haphazard and faltering process, driven as it is by independently conducted occasional discussions and votes on each time somewhat restricted groups of lexical entities. This is guaranteed to lead to some apparently arbitrary discrepancies. We should attempt a clean-up every now and then. Until then, we have to live with some regrettable inconsistencies. --Lambiam 16:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * To delete Arbër Highway we can appeal to the analagous rule that name+surname pairs are not to be included, and the custom that only the most famous celebrities get a sense under a single name. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 23:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 00:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete - not an English language term. Like Sverige and Italia don't have English entries (although Italia has on Old English entry). Facts707 (talk) 17:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Arbër Highway


text:
Talk:take a crap

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021
SOP: take (verb sense 14.1, 'undergo') + a + crap (Etymology 1, noun sense 5, 'act of defecation'). —Mahāgaja · talk 19:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep >SOP — Dentonius 20:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you sure the learner won't interpret it as collecting faeces? — Dentonius 20:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * This sense of take is common, one can take a shit, take a break, take a bath, etc... Leasnam (talk) 20:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know, pal. I know language learners — not the super genius polyglots we have here ... ordinary people. Are you sure an ordinary learner wouldn't think it's "accept junk"? Or maybe, it's "accept disrespect"? Hypothetical learner: "Was it I don't take crap or I don't take a crap from nobody? Oh, English is so confused." — Dentonius 20:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * American English. In Britain one can have a crap, if one wants to express it that way. DonnanZ (talk) 00:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. It doesn't fall under meaning 14.1 (or any other meaning I saw). It wouldn't make sense to say "undergo/be subjected to a crap." In addition, the phrase doesn't work if we substitute the noun ("take an act of defecation," "take feces," etc.; "take a poop" is questionable; but compare "take a shit"). Lastly, because has so many meanings, I'm inclined to let most of its set-phrasey collocations lie. (see also my vote to keep take responsibility). Imetsia (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I didn't consider the similar "take a break/nap." Imetsia (talk) 19:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Leasnam, this sense of "take" seems common, with numerous possibilities. If it is not presently adequately covered at take then it should be. I have argued before, I think, to keep certain technically SoP "take" combinations because of the number of different senses there, but this one seems just too generic. Mihia (talk) 01:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Leasnam. I could take a break, take a shower, take a nap, etc. too. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:55, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Abstain. What about ? 2A02:2788:A4:205:29FF:D95E:382C:FD20 23:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Leasnam. --Robbie SWE (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:take a crap


text:
Talk:-stan-

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021

 * See Talk:-gest-.

title: Talk:-stan-


text:
Talk:-andr-

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021

 * See Talk:-gest-.

title: Talk:-andr-


text: mucosopurulent

title: mucosopurulent


text: mudhopper

title: mudhopper


text: mudhoppers

title: mudhoppers


text:
kapuranta

Etymology
From.

title: kapuranta


text:
खा़न्‍जर

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) wisdom, knowledge

title: खा़न्‍जर


text:
Talk:Drovorub

RFD discussion: January–March 2021
Product name. Hardly dictionary material. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 12:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Abstain I only included it as it seemed awkward linking the relevant English wikipedia article in the entry for the original Russian term (which I'm not sure has this sense), but I'll defer to someone who has a better feel for the criteria for inclusion. Helrasincke (talk) 12:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Product names use words all the time. I'm not convinced we need to list it under the Russian entry either. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 19:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't satisfy WT:BRAND. Ultimateria (talk) 03:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep — Dentonius 08:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Drovorub


text:
Talk:I'll be right back

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021
(note: This entry is part of the phrasebook project.)

We already have be right back, don't see how this is any different. For instance we have see you later, not I'll see you later. The abbreviation BRB shouldn't be there either. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep . I'll say more when I get back from my run. It's a part of the phrasebook project. This phrase is literally in every phrasebook ever printed. — Dentonius 19:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Wiktionary has in most cases opted not to include a personal pronoun if the phrase can be applied to various constellations: one can say I'll be right back, we'll be right back, they'll be right back, he'll be right back, she'll be right back, etc., not to mention formal forms like I will be right back, we will be right back, etc. To keep the entry and any translation at be right back just makes more sense. An alternative to deleting would be merging or redirecting to be right back. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Abstain. I've added all the new information from I'll be right back to be right back. What now? Should we redirect? — Dentonius 19:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * But Robbie, just for argument's sake, how is using be right back better for translations? For your language, we have "vin imediat", "venim imediat" for the 1st person singular and plural. In terms of what makes sense for a phrasebook, well, I think "I'll be right back" and "we'll be right back" would make sense. These are the phrases you would find in a real life phrasebook. It's less likely that you'd find the other forms. The elliptical form -- "be right back" -- should be here too since that's how we speak informally. What would be the best way to deal with this? I'm not sure. — Dentonius 19:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * A phrasebook is always inherently flawed, because all languages are unique and adhere to different rules and semantic traditions. In this case, the Romanian translation you provided is ok, but not satisfactory - it does not imply that the person has been in one place, leaves the place, but intends to return shortly. "Vin/venim imediat" is closer to "(I'll/we'll) be right there". But that's the thing with phrasebooks; many translations are tangent at best, therefore, what is included and how it's worded, should be chosen with the utmost caution. For all intents and purposes, be right back is the most neutral phrase which allows for a more inclusive translation section. --Robbie SWE (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * But that's what I'm getting at. What do you think we gain by having one entry instead of three? On French Wiktionary, for example, they don't even care about reduplication of information. For them, an entry is an entry. They don't use any "alternative form of" or anything like that. Here, we have tools and templates to help us reduce redundancy, so there really is no need to delete. If we deleted this term, however, you'd be erasing the most natural way for us English-speakers to express ourselves. I can assure you that I'd much rather say "I'll be right back" than "Be right back" in real life. And we still haven't addressed the main problem: why delete the one entry which you'd actually find in a phrasebook? I'm looking at a phrasebook now and I can't find "Be right back". I do see "I'll be right back." Seeing is believing. Here's an Italian phrasebook. — Dentonius 05:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The English Wiktionary is an independent project, which has its own set of rules and guidelines. We don't and shouldn't do whatever our sister projects do just because it's easier. Lambiam summarised the difficulties of this phrase and other phrases like it, more so than I did. --Robbie SWE (talk) 09:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject need not even be a pronoun; it can be a noun phrase instead:  the doctor will be right back;  the robbers will be right back. Or it can be omitted:  ∅ will be right back. And the being right back need not be a promise, set in the future: he would have been right back. --Lambiam 01:18, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to be right back. bd2412 T 01:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 07:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to be right back.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 10:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Ultimateria (talk) 19:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirected. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:I'll be right back


text:
Talk:recal

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021
I propose deletion of the entry "recal", not so much because I believe it inappropriate (to the contrary I was the one who created the entry in the first place), but because it seems to so frustrate other editors that they have changed it to a different meaning. Let me explain. I discovered this word used by Charles Dickens (an example quote is in the entry), and I originally considered it an orthographic peculiarity of Dickens. Then I discovered an 18th century dictionary (described as "complete," I guess what we would call unabridged) by John Ash. This dictionary was so popular that after its publication in 1775 it was re-published in the 1790s. In any event it treated "recal" as separate from "recall," not as spelling variants, but rather as separate entries. I then created the entry, following the definition (for noun and verb) provided by Ash and footnoting the reference.

Not long after that, an editor entered a primary definition both for the verb and moun as a misspelling of "recall." This of course makes no sense as a dictionary entry. If every misspelling were included, the dictionary would be twice as big just from entries of words used by James Joyce. Plus, it is silly to describe it as the primary meaning of the work.

Later another editor revised the definitions provided by Ash, without any reference for the revision, as an obsolete or original version of "recall." Clearly this is not what Ash had in mind. If that is going to stand as the secondary meaning of the misspelling, then the entire entry makes no sense and the word "recal" should be put in the entry (if anywhere) "recall" as a variation.

Even if these two edits were reverted, I can't see how other editors would not decide to change the meaning. Perhaps they are right. Whatever the reality, the entry provides too great a temptation to remain. And I propose to be deleted. AnthroMimus (talk) 00:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep. In the dictionary by Ash, I see the following definitions for the verbs and :
 * Reca′l (v. t. from re, and call) To call back, to revoke.
 * Reca′ll (v. t. a different ſpelling ) To recal, to call back, to revoke.
 * So to Ash, these were merely spelling variants and did not correspond to different meanings. Until the late 19th century, the spelling with one l, now in disuse, was still fairly common. The entry as it stands seems fine to me. --Lambiam 16:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep, per Lambiam. --Robbie SWE (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

 * It sounds like we might benefit from a usage note in one or both entries, if recal was formerly a (or the?) standard spelling for one (or all?) senses. Certainly, we should include an entry for the spelling (if it is attested, and was once standard), pointing to what is now the standard spelling (without duplicating definitions). - -sche (discuss) 22:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Google Ngrams Viewer suggests that it was never the standard spelling, but merely a perfectly acceptable spelling until around 1810, when its gradual decline really began to set in. --Lambiam 12:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The obsolete spelling cal for modern call can also be attested, but was never similarly popular. --Lambiam 11:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep — Dentonius 08:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-kept. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:recal


text:
Talk:Dutch-built

RFD discussion: January–March 2021
SOP: Belgian-built, Nigerian-built, Ethiopian-built, etc. PUC – 12:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * My prediction on what SemperBlotto's vote is going to be: "We should keep them, but not go out of our way to actually add them." PUC – 14:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That was better left unsaid. DonnanZ (talk) 16:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Adding:

Swiss-built
--Lambiam 13:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete, obviously. --Lambiam 13:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Predictable, I suppose. I'm not sure they are all that obvious, and they can be classed as single words, with proven usage (quotes are available), so this is yet another test case. Keep both. DonnanZ (talk) 13:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * "I'm not sure they are all that obvious": the agentive meaning of the first component is a regular feature of such compounds in English: compare Dutch-led ("Dutch-led investigation"), American-led ("American-led investigation"), etc. PUC – 14:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Note that WT:SOP specifies explicitly : “Idiomaticity rules apply to hyphenated compounds in the same way as to spaced phrases.” The argument that a term can be “classed” as a single word is irrelevant here. --Lambiam 17:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete. These can even stack, e.g. I found "an American-British-led coalition in the first gulf war". Equinox ◑ 16:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Nah, double-barrelled surnames don't even stack up here. DonnanZ (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete both — Mnemosientje (t · c) 17:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete both, --Robbie SWE (talk) 17:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  17:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Fay Freak (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Both RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Dutch-built


text:
Talk:look down someone's shirt

RFD discussion: January–March 2021
"(idiomatic, slang, mildly vulgar) To look at a girl's breasts. Stop looking down her shirt!" My problems with this entry are:

 * The definition says nothing about shirts, and yet surely looking at a naked girl's breasts (or looking at them up the shirt, from below) is not "looking down a shirt".
 * I don't see how the term is remotely slang or vulgar, even if the habit might be creepy.
 * Isn't it basically overelaboration of a sum-of-part phrase? You could look down a male baby's shirt to try to find the food he spat down there. That's still looking down someone's shirt.

Equinox ◑ 13:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as SoP. If kept, then change "breasts" to "cleavage". SemperBlotto (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I would use this when there is visible cleavage or a loose neck. I would not use it to describe staring at well-covered breasts or when the angle does not allow taking advantage of what exposure the clothes offer.  I would use it when a woman is bending over and the shirt falls away from her chest; the line of sight is horizontal relative to the earth but down relative to the her normal orientation.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't wanna sound old-fashioned, but isn't the female equivalent a blouse; look down someone's blouse? Shirts always strike me as being typically male, even if everything's mostly unisex nowadays. --Robbie SWE (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete, SOP. Also, women aren't the only people this happens to: as a gay man, I have looked down guys' shirts to see their chest hair, while they were bending forward and the shirt fell away from the chest. —Mahāgaja · talk 15:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ugh. 2A00:23C8:A0C:8C01:6040:3980:282:2D1 10:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Please dear anon, do us all a favour and keep your stupid comments on your Facebook wall and stop posting them here. --Robbie SWE (talk) 13:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ignore the IP, tell us more! Ultimateria (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete, if kept, then change the wording so it becomes gender-neutral. --Robbie SWE (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Imetsia (talk) 19:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom. If kept, fix the definition: at a minimum it requires a shirt, as Equinox says! (If someone is in a dress, it's "looking down someone's dress"; ditto "top", "blouse", "tank top", and I can even find uses of "looking down her robe", "T-shirt", and "sweater", which does suggest this isn't idiomatic.) Like Vox and Mahagaja, I've seen it used to refer to looking in a horizontal direction that is "down" relative to a bending-over person's normal orientation, but it can also refer to looking literally down, like if someone walks up to (behind) a seated woman and looks down her shirt (where it has a neckline that makes cleavage visible). I'm surprised by how few Google Books hits I find for "look(|s|ed|ing) down his shirt", but I do think the term is not restricted to women. Indeed, I dimly recall an op-ed by someone who worked at a charity who said people would look down their shirt trying to figure out what gender they were (IIRC if was because it wasn't common for cis women to head that kind of charity). - -sche (discuss) 07:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Given the number of variations, delete. Some of those sound wrong to me, but I have heard at last dress and blouse.  (Interesting to note that the opposite direction has given the language, which I would accept when the skirt is really a dress, but I have never heard of downshirting as a thing.)  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 * It's . Equinox ◑ 13:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Which we only list as an adjective, but is also used as a verb:, , . --Lambiam 09:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the search te-- I mean, correction. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 19:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep — Dentonius 08:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, an exceptionally worthless entry. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  10:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:look down someone's shirt


text:
Talk:indentified

RFD discussion: January–March 2021
Listed as "Misspelling of identified." There are no entries coordinate with this one for any other forms of identify, including the lemma itself. This is not a misspelling, but a typo. We don't include typographical errors. PseudoSkull (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, but for the record, it's not true that we don't include typographical errors; unfortunately, there's no policy that excludes them per se. See Votes/2019-03/Excluding typos and scannos. PUC – 21:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 * I think some people have the misconception that indentify (and derived terms) is the correct spelling. Exhibit: this two-and-a-half page article, which contains on the first page the terms “indentification”, “indentify” and “indentified”, on the second page again “indentified” (twice), and on its final half page another “indentification”. It is difficult to see this as an accumulation of indentical typos. --Lambiam 21:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Yes, delete. I don't add misspellings that I come across any more. It would make using us as a spell-checker more difficult. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 * I would like us to have a mechanism for telling people who look up "indentified" that there is no such word, and that presumably it is a spelling error for "identified", without gracing "indentified" with an actual entry. I feel the same way about many errors. If, once it is deleted, typing "indentified" brings up "identified" in the list of suggestions, then that would be a partial solution, but I would like to see a solution for errors that is a little more directed than one item amongst many in the drop-down list, but short of an actual entry. Mihia (talk) 23:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:indentified


text:
Talk:foot massage

RFD discussion: January–March 2021
Seems sum of parts to me. Pious Eterino (talk) 13:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. PUC – 13:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If I massage someone with my feet, I'd also call it a foot massage Alexfromiowa (talk) 00:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Which is evidence of SOP-hood and thus an implicit argument for deletion. --Lambiam 13:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * foot massages don't mean shit Alexfromiowa (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as standard English usage, note feet massage is rarely used. DonnanZ (talk) 14:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It is a general rule of English compounds that a noun functioning as the modifier takes the singular form, even if the meaning is obviously plural. A “brick wall” cannot be built with just one brick, but *“bricks wall” is not an acceptable term. The “horse-drawn carriage” in the image here is drawn by a span of horses, yet one cannot say that it is a *“horses-drawn carriage”. This is particularly evident if the modifier itself is modified with a numeral other than, as in , which is not a pole of *“ten foot” but of ten . --Lambiam 17:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious SOP. No different than, , , etc. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 18:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, as SoP, but I'm going to miss it though. --Robbie SWE (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * And erotic massage got deleted, but Spanish masaje erótico remains. Alexfromiowa (talk) 16:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, there are massages for everything. Fay Freak (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep — Dentonius 08:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  10:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:foot massage


text:
Talk:werki

RFD discussion: January–March 2021
Apparently an obsolete spelling of. Seems to be a misconstruction from an attested plural in a work of Scottish theologian John Knox. The plural ending in this case is in fact -is, which is typical of Scottish writing in the middle and early modern periods.

(This of course raises the additional question of whether the quotation is in fact Scots rather than English.)86.145.59.95 20:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete. I added  and  based on DSL.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fay Freak (talk) 22:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Leasnam (talk) 05:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, let's get the snowball rolling. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  09:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:werki


text:
Talk:crazy in love

RFD discussion: February–March 2021
SOP: adverb +. PUC – 12:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete. Is Wonderfool a Beyoncé fan? Equinox ◑ 13:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: That was Wonderfool? Damn. He removed "porridge" from the storage/forage/etc. rhyme page because he said it "didn't rhyme". WTH? Khemehekis (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Wonderfool is from southern England like myself. "Storage" does not rhyme with "porridge" or "forage" in our accent. Equinox ◑ 21:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Huh. Wonderfool must have felt like that American I saw online who complained that Chad Kroeger (a Canadian) had to mispronounce sorry to get it to rhyme with story in "How You Remind Me". Khemehekis (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete. --幽霊四 (talk) 13:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Imetsia (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep — Dentonius 08:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC).

 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:crazy in love


text:
Talk:not all heroes wear capes

RFD discussion: February–March 2021
Not a proverb, but just a commonplace. Also SOP despite the indirect language, the clear implication is that the implicit referent is a hero despite not wearing a cape. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  09:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The reason why I requested its creation was exactly because the implication didn't occur to me. Not all readers have grown up on Superman stories and associate wearing a cape primarily with that character. --Droigheann (talk) 10:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep. People only recently started saying this, but I see value in keeping it here, especially for non-native speakers of English. — Dentonius 13:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The implication is not clear to everybody, and wording seems fixed-ish; "not all heroes wear capes" has 1.44 million G-hits, "some heroes don't wear capes" has just 23,000.--Tibidibi (talk) 13:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not necessarily disputing your conclusion, but I think it is worth pointing out again that numbers such as this 1.44m are Large Random Numbers™ that bear no relation to actual retrievable results, and that have no known explanation as to what they actually mean. For me, actual retrievable results for "not all heroes wear capes" run out at "about 254 results", while for "some heroes don't wear capes" they run out at "about 93 results". Mihia (talk) 15:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Imetsia (talk) 15:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep, maybe not a standard proverb, but has the makings of becoming one. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not all proverbs wear doublets. Khemehekis (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Frankly I would Not create this, on the grounds that it does not qualify as dictionary material. Mihia (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not really a sum of parts. Glades12 (talk) 10:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Never heard of it. It sounds quite pathetic though, is that grounds for deletion? DonnanZ (talk) 21:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's a slogan used to applaud people like front-line medical personnel who are helping everyone get through the current crisis. That's a great sentiment and well worth saying- but is it something lexical that should be covered by a dictionary? Chuck Entz (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Nope. Wiktionary doesn't exclude terms just because someone doesn't like them. Glades12 (talk) 12:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * There are some like that I find offensive every time I come across them. DonnanZ (talk) 09:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, I suppose. I find it odd to call these modern Facebookisms "proverbs", but the entry looks okay, and tautology isn't an excluding criterion (it is what it is, che sara sara). Equinox ◑ 03:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Kept Purplebackpack89 14:37, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:not all heroes wear capes


text:
Talk:human behaviour

human behavior
SOP. PUC – 12:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

 * I wonder why the British spelling has been targeted by this user and not the American spelling. DonnanZ (talk) 14:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * When a term does not survive RfD and is deleted, then – unless the deleting admin is careless – alternative spellings go with it. --Lambiam 15:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, the nominator was careless, so the RFD should fail on a technicality. DonnanZ (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * : I've added the US spelling. Happy? PUC – 16:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I won't be supporting any RFD nominations by that user anyway. DonnanZ (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete SoP. The current definition seems to imply a focus on consciousness by using the term decision-making. This implies what I thought was a very dated (pre-Plato) view of human behavior. Is such a view making another comeback? DCDuring (talk) 14:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are books on primate behaviour, or more generally animal behaviour; "human behaviour" is nothing but animal behaviour specialized to the species . --Lambiam 15:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I think the justification was that as an academic discipline, "Human Behavior" has a meaning beyond that of "Human" + "Behavior". It was established in the Tea Room discussion that it is considered an academic discipline worthy of majoring in, at least in some colleges. I don't know if that in itself makes it worthy of inclusion, but we do have many other academic disciplines/fields of study that would otherwise be SoP: music theory, cultural anthropology, philosophy of science, food science, film studies, international relations. So I'm not saying "Keep", but I don't see how you can "Delete" and not also delete these and many other similar entries. Perhaps special rules should apply to fields of study that are a bit more generous than strict SoP would allow. --RDBury (talk) 02:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Generally, we consider each entry on its own merits. “Human behaviour” as an academic subject is concerned with the study of human behaviour. “Film studies” as an academic subject is not concerned with the study of film studies. --Lambiam 15:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Specifically film studies is not about (say) the chemical composition of films, though you wouldn't know that if you'd never heard the term before. Equinox ◑ 23:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

 * I don't see the distinction you're trying to draw. "Music theory" is concerned with the theory of music, "Cultural anthropology" is concerned with the cultural aspects of anthropology, "Philosophy of science" is concerned with philosophy as applied to science, "Film studies" is concerned with the study of film, "International relations" is concerned with relations between nations; they all seem to be pretty tautologous statements. It's not totally clear that "film" means "cinema" but I think what is meant is what is understood. I'm not saying delete these entries, but I don't see how the reasons you're giving to delete "Human Behavior" don't apply to all these other cases. --RDBury (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Imagine that a group of scientists develop such an interest in water filtration that they organize an Annual Conference on Water Filtration, found academic journals Water Filtration and its competitor Intenational Journal of Water Filtration, and Nestlé endows a chair at a prestigious university, stipulating that they allow students to obtain a BS in "Water Filtration". The study proves popular, and other universities follow suit. Would this scenario engender a new sense of the collocation water filtration, namely “the study of processes for filtering water”? I should say not. The meaning of a term does not change by people taking an interest in it, and referring to “the study of ” just by “” is, IMO, standard metonymy that should not be lexicalized. --Lambiam 13:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I would be inclined to delete the entries for all the above-mentioned disciplines. "Topic + studies", for instance, is a typical way of forming the name of new disciplines. Cf. and, both of which are offered at my university, and neither of which we have. As for , I say delete. Being an academic discipline doesn't suddenly make it non-SOP. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I would keep and . Not sure about the others. But it's true I can't really articulate why right now. PUC – 13:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * There seems to be an impression that the examples I gave above were an exhaustive list, but they weren't meant to be. If it would be helpful I could try to create a full list, but the above were just a few examples to illustrate a point. --RDBury (talk) 02:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Comment. To me the definition seems slightly strangely worded if it is supposed to refer to an academic discipline. Does "human behaviour" actually mean "The academic study of how ..."? Isn't it in fact the thing studied, rather than the action of studying? Also, is "human behaviour" limited to the study of how human beings make decisions ? Mihia (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Yes, it is the study, not just the behaviour itself. Found on Google: (i) "I took human behavior in the summer term and I loved it."; "In '99 I took human behavior as part of my psych degree program." Equinox ◑ 15:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understand what kind of meaning is intended, but to me the definition seems off somehow. Isn't "the academic study of how ..." the thing that you do when you "take human behaviour", not the subject that you study? Or is it just me? Mihia (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep both — Dentonius 08:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:17, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:human behaviour


text:
Talk:e-message

RFD discussion: January–March 2021
I can find almost no real use of this word in English. Nothing in the (London) Times, New York Times, LA Times, or other online dictionaries. Nothing in Google Ngram. General Google search mostly finds programming code examples and brand names. There is one result from 2020 in Boston Globe. Two results from CNN, and one from the Washington Post, but all of these are from audio transcripts, and I'm not even sure they're right. This looks too little to me to be considered a stable dictionary entry. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep of course. Three citations now added. Equinox ◑ 07:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep, although there's no mention of synonyms. An by another name? DonnanZ (talk) 09:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 * I'd imagine it would also include instant messages, newsgroup postings, etc. etc. Equinox ◑ 09:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep; should have been sent to RFV rather than RFD. —Mahāgaja · talk 12:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It is a sum of parts, + .  That's for RFD.  Delete. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 13:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Are you serious? What about all the other e- words like e-mail and e-business? Equinox ◑ 14:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * E-mail is an alternative spelling of email which, being spelled without a hyphen, is not subject to the sum of parts rule. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Despite, emessage looks kinda wrong, but I notice the form eMessage is relatively common on Google. is a valid prefix anyway (whether E- or e- is used), so I don't see a problem with e-message. DonnanZ (talk) 16:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep; On the Government website of the governor of Washington there is a page where it says "Send Gov. Inslee an e-message". --Gorec (talk) 09:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete, as "hyphenated compound" (WT:CFI). (WT fails to differ between derivation and composition, which can also be seen in the single section "Derived terms" for both.) --幽霊四 (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Imetsia (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 * There are five separate prefixes. Yet an e-message is specifically only one of these things, the one that means "electronic". Equinox ◑ 18:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep — Dentonius 08:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-kept. Not much consensus here, but more keep votes than delete and a possibility of COALMINE applying. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:e-message


text:
Talk:as a result

RFD discussion: February–March 2021
SOP. Even if kept, the entry is in a terrible state. The part of speech is wrong; the quotation does not match the given definition; most of the translations translate the phrase "as a result of". We should move the translations to a new translation hub entry at. 2001:8000:1588:B800:C5D2:999A:B577:3569 01:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The sole existing example, "England will not be catapulted among the favourites for Euro 2012 as a result of this win", is clearly not that of a conjunction, and, as you say, does not match the definition. I've replaced that with one that is more conjunction-like. Here they call "as a result" a "conjunctive adverbial phrase"; here they call it a conjunction. Suspect there are a number of similar "as a ~" phrases: as a consequence, as a rule, as a corollary etc., but leaning keep for "as a result" as idiomatic enough. Mihia (talk) 18:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * But the three synonyms given in the definition line are all defined as adverbs... 2001:8000:1588:B800:253B:D35A:D8C4:94CF 22:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry, you're right, they are not "pure" conjunctions (and neither is "as a result"). These are often called "conjunctive adverbs". Do we have a PoS category "conjunctive adverb"? If not, perhaps the PoS should be changed to "adverb", with a "conjunctive" label, if that's how we treat words such as "thus" and "therefore". Mihia (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I've made that change. Mihia (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are many common phrases of the form “as a ...”. While this one is the most common among them, I see no argument why the combination is less transparent than any of the others. It may even be the one whose meaning is the most easily derived from the meanings of its components. --Lambiam 07:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Most common form and set phrase. "As an effect," "as a product," etc. would seem unnatural. Imetsia (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep. I'm also in favour of the creation of as a result of. — Dentonius 08:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, thanks Mihia for adding a better label. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep - sounds like a set phrase to me. BigDom 20:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-kept. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:as a result


text:
Talk:have a hard-on for

RFD discussion: January–March 2021
SOP. PUC – 17:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

have a hard-on
SOP. A translation hub, I guess, but do we really need/want this? PUC – 17:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep unless we add the figurative meaning to hard-on —Mahāgaja · talk 20:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete after adding the figurative meaning per Mahāgaja, also seen in give someone a hard-on and get a hard-on. --Lambiam 22:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * But... you didn't, though.__Gamren (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I feel such things should generally be incumbent on the proposer when, as in this case, the claimed SOPpiness depends on it. --Lambiam 20:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, I have a hard-on (“difficult time”) trying to find this phrase used on the normal web (although Twitter has lots), which shows me the combination is not idiomatic – the occurrences are only because, so many people talking in public nowadays, common words combine in all ways. Of course, we are missing a lot of senses for as under this long page title and as that slang dictionary exemplifies. Another reason for deletion is that given all those meanings it is unlikely one opens specifically that long page. Fay Freak (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep both — Dentonius 08:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and add sense to hard-on. Ultimateria (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Ultimateria. --Robbie SWE (talk) 20:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:have a hard-on for


text:
Talk:Swiss-built

RFD discussion: January–March 2021

 * See Talk:Dutch-built.

title: Talk:Swiss-built


text:
Talk:have a hard-on

RFD discussion: January–March 2021

 * See Talk:have a hard-on for.

title: Talk:have a hard-on


text:
Talk:human behavior

RFD discussion: January–March 2021

 * See Talk:human behaviour.

title: Talk:human behavior


text:
खाप्‌सि

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) cotton, linen

title: खाप्‌सि


text:
mugwumpian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to a mugwump.

title: mugwumpian


text:
muircock

Noun

 * 1) moorcock

title: muircock


text:
muirfowl

Noun

 * 1) moorfowl

title: muirfowl


text:
jerang

Verb

 * 1) to  water

Verb

 * 1) to  a  above a  to.
 * 2) to.
 * 1) to.

title: jerang


text:
seaful

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The amount that a sea can contain.

title: seaful


text:
घ्रोदु़

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) goat,

title: घ्रोदु़


text:
karantala

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * : the inner and somewhat concave part of the human hand that extends from the wrist to the bases of the fingers.

title: karantala


text:
ङेचो

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) ear

title: ङेचो


text:
mulattoism

Noun

 * 1) The quality of being mulatto.

title: mulattoism


text: isolementen

title: isolementen


text:
Talk:along of

2. (together) with
You come along a me, Ginger —J. Cary, 1940 --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:along of


text:
चकपा़

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) flea

title: चकपा़


text:
muletress

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A female muleteer.

title: muletress


text: muletresses

title: muletresses


text:
Putih

Etymology
From, from.

title: Putih


text:
muliebrious

Adjective

 * 1)  muliebral; womanly; feminine

title: muliebrious


text:
multiareolate

Adjective

 * 1) Having multiple areolas.

title: multiareolate


text:
lokatikranta

Etymology
.

title: lokatikranta


text: Wiktionary:Word of the day/2021/April 13


text: multiarticulated

title: multiarticulated


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Uralic/wole-

Alternative reconstructions

 * *ole-

Etymology
Probably a frequentative derivative of a monosyllabic verb stem (*(w)o-le-);  see  for more. Has also sometimes been compared to, , or alternatively.

Verb

 * 1) to be, exist; will be

Descendants

 * Ugric:
 * Mansi:
 * Mari:
 * Mari:
 * Mari:
 * Mari:
 * Mari:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Uralic/wole-


text:
multibreak

Adjective

 * 1) Involving more than one break.
 * a multibreak switching device

title: multibreak


text:
lekman

Etymology
From, from , the first compound from. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) laity people who are not members of the clergy
 * 2) layman, layperson someone who is not especially familiar with a particular topic

title: lekman


text:
चक्ता

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) shrew, field mouse

title: चक्ता


text: Citations:fuckup

title: Citations:fuckup


text:
𑆋

Pronunciation

Letter

 * 1) the ninth vowel in the Sharada script.

title: 𑆋


text:
jälleenkytkentä

Noun

 * 1) reconnection, reclosing

title: jälleenkytkentä


text:
फु

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) plant, tree
 * 2) capital (assets, money etc...)
 * 3) chief person of a clan or dynasty
 * 4) father and mother

title: फु


text:
चस

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) kidney

title: चस


text:
𑆌

Pronunciation

Letter

 * 1) the tenth vowel in the Sharada script.

title: 𑆌


text: multicarinated

title: multicarinated


text:
multicircuit

Adjective

 * 1) Involving more than one circuit.

title: multicircuit


text:
चादे

Etymology
.

Adverb

 * 1) somewhere

title: चादे


text:
multiconstant

Adjective

 * 1) Involving more than one constant.
 * a multiconstant equation

title: multiconstant


text: multidenticulated

title: multidenticulated


text:
चा़इमा़

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) heap

title: चा़इमा़


text:
चिन्किनिम

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) snail, slug

title: चिन्किनिम


text:
multiganglionic

Adjective

 * 1) Involving more than one ganglion.

title: multiganglionic


text:
multigrapher

Noun

 * 1) One who uses a multigraph combined rotary typesetting and printing machine.

title: multigrapher


text: multigraphers

title: multigraphers


text:
multihearth

Adjective

 * 1) Having more than one hearth.
 * a multihearth furnace

title: multihearth


text:
चुक्सु

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) white spruce

title: चुक्सु


text: multigranulated

title: multigranulated


text:
चुयु

Etymology
.

Adverb

 * 1) completely

title: चुयु


text: multilaminated

title: multilaminated


text: multinucleolated

title: multinucleolated


text:
syala

Etymology
From. .

title: syala


text:
चुर्भम

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) thistle

title: चुर्भम


text:
Talk:ardire

To add to entry
To add to this entry: ardire is also used as a musical term, referring to expression (usually some form of vibrato) added to a sung note. 76.190.208.61 16:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:ardire


text: multituberculated

title: multituberculated


text:
multitudinosity

Noun

 * 1) The quality of being multitudinous.

title: multitudinosity


text:
multituberculism

Noun

 * 1) The property of being multituberculate.

title: multituberculism


text:
multituberculy

Noun

 * 1) The property of being multituberculate.

title: multituberculy


text: Launton

title: Launton


text:
𑆍

Letter

 * 1) the seventh vowel in the Sharada script.

Pronunciation

Letter

 * 1) the eleventh vowel in the Sharada script.

title: 𑆍


text:
mummydom

Noun

 * 1) The realm or sphere of mummies mummified bodies.

title: mummydom


text:
municipalizer

Noun

 * 1) One who municipalizes.

title: municipalizer


text: municipalizers

title: municipalizers


text: munj

title: munj


text:
pedalstwo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  faggotry
 * 2)  faggotry

title: pedalstwo


text: mundifiers

title: mundifiers


text:
tirta amarta

Etymology
Compound of.

title: tirta amarta


text:
munificency

Noun

 * 1) munificence

title: munificency


text: munificencies

title: munificencies


text:
muriformly

Adverb

 * 1) In a muriform manner.

title: muriformly


text:
어리광

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) childish behavior

title: 어리광


text: yam daisy

title: yam daisy


text:
fiu-bździu

Noun

 * 1)  bullshit, bunkum, nonsense, poppycock, triviality

title: fiu-bździu


text: yam daisies

title: yam daisies


text:
Talk:murnong

Further plants within genus?
Per Wikipedia this may also refer to Microseris walteri or Microseris scapigera. Equinox ◑ 17:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:murnong


text: kiffeli

title: kiffeli


text:
multitudinal

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) ; very numerous.

title: multitudinal


text:
muscologic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to muscology.

title: muscologic


text:
muscological

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to muscology.

title: muscological


text: 아부지

title: 아부지


text:
musculospinal

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to muscles and the spinal cord.

title: musculospinal


text:
musculoarterial

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to muscles and arteries.

title: musculoarterial


text:
musculocellular

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to muscles and cells.

title: musculocellular


text:
Hieronim

Etymology 1
, from.

title: Hieronim


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/patto

Etymology
urj-fin-pro.

Noun

 * 1) crime, sin

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/patto


text:
musculotegumentary

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to muscle and tegument.

title: musculotegumentary


text:
versleg

Etymology
From. Equivalent to af.

Verb

 * 1) to worsen, to deteriorate

title: versleg


text:
Musgu

Proper noun

 * 1) A language of the Biu–Mandara subgroup of the Chadic languages.

title: Musgu


text:
mushroomic

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of mushrooms.

title: mushroomic


text: Citations:Koramlik

title: Citations:Koramlik


text:
샤먼

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) shaman type of religious practitioner in certain cultures

Etymology 2
From.

title: 샤먼


text: Category:ko:Cities in Fujian

title: Category:ko:Cities in Fujian


text: Category:ko:Fujian

title: Category:ko:Fujian


text: Category:ko:Places in Fujian

title: Category:ko:Places in Fujian


text:
педрила

Noun

 * 1)  faggot
 * 2)  an unpleasant person

title: педрила


text: musicasters

title: musicasters


text:
musicmonger

Noun

 * 1)  A seller of music.
 * 2)  An inferior musician.

title: musicmonger


text: musicmongers

title: musicmongers


text:
förtala

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  defame, slander, libel
 * 2) calumniate, cast aspersions
 * 1) calumniate, cast aspersions

title: förtala


text:
musicophobia

Noun

 * 1) Aversion to music.

title: musicophobia


text: 金州

title: 金州


text:
musicopoetic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to music and poetry.

title: musicopoetic


text: Rhymes:Dutch/aːʒə

title: Rhymes:Dutch/aːʒə


text:
eläinkirja

Noun

 * 1) animal book illustrated book about animals

title: eläinkirja


text:
musicoartistic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to music and art.

title: musicoartistic


text:
kasvikirja

Noun

 * 1) plant book illustrated book about plants

title: kasvikirja


text:
musicodramatic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to music and drama.

title: musicodramatic


text:
musicophilosophical

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to music and philosophy.

title: musicophilosophical


text:
sienikirja

Noun

 * 1) mushroom book illustrated book about mushrooms

title: sienikirja


text:
poissaolokirja

Noun

 * 1) a booklet where a teacher fills in details of pupils' absences

title: poissaolokirja


text:
Guidonian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (c. 991 – after 1033), Italian music theorist and pedagogue of the medieval era, regarded as the inventor of modern musical staff notation.

Translations

 * Finnish: guidolainen
 * French:
 * Polish: gwidoński
 * Romanian:
 * Russian:

title: Guidonian


text:
ärekränka

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Verb

 * 1)  defame, slander, libel

title: ärekränka


text:
mushru

Noun

 * 1) A satin fabric with cotton backing, often patterned.

title: mushru


text:
우틔

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  clothing; clothes

title: 우틔


text: 滾弄

title: 滾弄


text: 滚弄

title: 滚弄


text: eendenkooien

title: eendenkooien


text:
Little Sutton

Related terms

 * Ellesmere Port: ,
 * South Holland: ,

title: Little Sutton


text: eendenmossels

title: eendenmossels


text:
Reconstruction:Old Persian/R̥tastūnā

Etymology
From.

title: Reconstruction:Old Persian/R̥tastūnā


text:
musicomechanical

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to music and mechanical devices for its playback or measurement.
 * The metronome is a musicomechanical device.

title: musicomechanical


text:
musketade

Noun

 * 1) The firing of muskets for a length of time.

title: musketade


text: musketades

title: musketades


text:
muskflower

Noun

 * 1) The monkeyflower.

title: muskflower


text: muskflowers

title: muskflowers


text:
muskish

Adjective

 * 1) musky

title: muskish


text: 陽澄湖

title: 陽澄湖


text: 阳澄湖

title: 阳澄湖


text:
mussable

Adjective

 * 1) Suitable for being mussed or tousled.
 * mussable hair

title: mussable


text:
Mussulwoman

Etymology
From (as though the second component were English ), and.

Noun

 * 1)  A female Muslim.

title: Mussulwoman


text: Mussulwomen

title: Mussulwomen


text:
羊卓雍錯

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: 羊卓雍錯


text: 羊卓雍错

title: 羊卓雍错


text:
अरहन्त्

Noun

 * 1)  (“ascetic”)

Adjective

 * 1)  (“honorable”)

title: अरहन्त्


text: 玛旁雍错

title: 玛旁雍错


text:
muskeggy

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of muskeg type of boggy terrain.

title: muskeggy


text:
mustarder

Etymology
From ; equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1)  A manufacturer of mustard.

title: mustarder


text: mustarders

title: mustarders


text: eendollarbiljetten

title: eendollarbiljetten


text:
瑪旁雍錯

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: 瑪旁雍錯


text:
musterdevillers

Noun

 * 1)  A kind of grey woolen cloth.

title: musterdevillers


text:
mutilatory

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to mutilation.

title: mutilatory


text:
岡仁波齊

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: 岡仁波齊


text: 冈仁波齐

title: 冈仁波齐


text:
mutuatitious

Adjective

 * 1)  borrowed

title: mutuatitious


text:
muzzlewood

Noun

 * 1) The tree.

title: muzzlewood


title: Template:R:Clauson:1959


text: mycetological

title: mycetological


text:
mycologize

Verb

 * 1)  To go looking for mushrooms or fungi.

title: mycologize


text:
失收

Verb

 * 1) to experience crop failure; to have a poor harvest
 * 2) to fail to include (something that should be included)
 * 1) to fail to include (something that should be included)

title: 失收


text: mycologized

title: mycologized


text: mycologizes

title: mycologizes


text: mycologizing

title: mycologizing


text:
mynpacht

Noun

 * 1)  A mining lease.

title: mynpacht


text: mynpachts

title: mynpachts


text:
myographer

Noun

 * 1) One who studies myography.

title: myographer


text: myographers

title: myographers


text: myopical

title: myopical


text:
ҡуйыу

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬; 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬,🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) put something somewhere, place; set
 * 2)  to put on stage, to stage, to produce
 * 3)  set; raise, present; pose
 * 4) appoint a person to a position, post or role
 * 5) bury a dead person
 * 6)  give a grade/mark
 * 7) to cease, stop
 * 1) bury a dead person
 * 2)  give a grade/mark
 * 3) to cease, stop

title: ҡуйыу


text:
myowun

Noun

 * 1)  A viceroy in parts of what is now Burma/Myanmar.

title: myowun


text: myowuns

title: myowuns


text:
refreŝigi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to

title: refreŝigi


text: myrobalun

title: myrobalun


text: myrabolam

title: myrabolam


text: myrabolams

title: myrabolams


text: myrobaluns

title: myrobaluns


text:
嚦峇

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  driver

title: 嚦峇


text: Clari

title: Clari


text:
Urbani

Etymology
From the personal name.

title: Urbani


text:
myriacoulomb

Noun

 * 1) a unit of electric charge equal to 10,000 coulombs

title: myriacoulomb


text: myriacoulombs

title: myriacoulombs


text: 呖峇

title: 呖峇


text: mysogynism

title: mysogynism


text:
ἀγαλλίς

Etymology
according to Beekes. The Diccionario Griego-Español proposes a derivation from, through , and subsequently influenced by the unrelated verb.

title: ἀγαλλίς


text:
mysticetous

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to the mysticete whales.

title: mysticetous


text:
mythoclastic

Adjective

 * 1) myth-destroying

title: mythoclastic


text:
mythicality

Noun

 * 1) The quality of being mythical.

title: mythicality


text: mythographist

title: mythographist


text: mythographists

title: mythographists


text: Gretas

title: Gretas


text:
Terenzi

Etymology
From the personal name.

title: Terenzi


text: Johannas

title: Johannas


text: Jennys

title: Jennys


text:
klecić

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to pull together, to rig up
 * 2)  to rig up
 * 3)  to appear, to arise, to perform

title: klecić


text: Rovella

title: Rovella


text:
sklecić

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to pull together, to rig up
 * 2)  to rig up
 * 3)  to appear, to arise, to perform

title: sklecić


text:
onveranderd

Etymology
From nl.

Adjective

 * 1) unchanged

title: onveranderd


text:
Cobelli

Etymology
Shortened form of.

title: Cobelli


text:
သမ္ဗုဒ္ဓ

Adjective

 * 1)  (“with perfect understanding”)

Noun

 * 1)  (“the enlightened one”)

title: သမ္ဗုဒ္ဓ


text:
일년감

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  tomato

title: 일년감


text:
ɨɨi

Etymology
Cognates include 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Root

 * 1) man

title: ɨɨi


text: Cocchia

title: Cocchia


text:
sammāsambuddha

Noun

 * 1) the fully enlightened one

title: sammāsambuddha


text:
Iacobelli

Etymology
From the personal name.

title: Iacobelli


text:
saitti

Etymology
.

title: saitti


text:
칼리움

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  potassium

title: 칼리움


text:
antialcoolic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) antialcohol

title: antialcoolic


text: Cocivera

title: Cocivera


text:
anticiclonic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) anticyclonic

title: anticiclonic


text:
antipoliomielitic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) antipoliomyelitis

title: antipoliomielitic


text:
antonimic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) antonymic

title: antonimic


text: Martani

title: Martani


text:
antroponomastic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) anthroponomic

title: antroponomastic


text: သမ္မာသမ္ဗုဒ္ဓ

title: သမ္မာသမ္ဗုဒ္ဓ


text:
bronșitic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) bronchitic

title: bronșitic


text:
catodic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) cathodic

title: catodic


text:
konirue

Etymology
Probably originally meaning "fellow's things", shifted to mean the fellow himself.

Noun

 * 1) lad, fellow

title: konirue


text:
cetonic

Etymology
..

Adjective

 * 1) ketonic

title: cetonic


text: Badsey

title: Badsey


text:
fotonic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) photonic

title: fotonic


text:
fototerapic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) phototherapic

title: fototerapic


text:
hidroponic

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) hydroponic

title: hidroponic


text:
𑆎

Pronunciation

Letter

 * 1) the twelfth vowel in the Sharada script.

title: 𑆎


text: Coduti

title: Coduti


text: Becocci

title: Becocci


text:
𑆏

Letter

 * 1) the eighth vowel in the Sharada script.

Pronunciation

Letter

 * 1) the thirteenth vowel in the Sharada script.

title: 𑆏


text: Category:Murui Huitoto terms suffixed with -a


text:
жыйынтык

Noun

 * 1) result, outcome, conclusion

title: жыйынтык


text:
мөлдүр

Adjective

 * 1) sparkling, clear

title: мөлдүр


text:
Coiro

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Coiro is the 37229th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 599 individuals. Coiro is most common among White (94.99%) individuals.

Etymology
Metathesized variant of.

title: Coiro


text: Aliotti

title: Aliotti


text:
кечирим

Noun

 * 1) pardon, forgiveness, excuse

title: кечирим


text:
Ἀρσής

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * :, a king of Persia

title: Ἀρσής


text:
кара жолтой

Adjective

 * 1) nefarious

title: кара жолтой


text: stanis

title: stanis


text: stanus

title: stanus


text:
Lowthorpe

Etymology
From the personal name  +.

Statistics

 * According to data collected by Forebears in 2014, Lowthorpe is the 20374th most common surname in England, belonging to 221 individuals.

title: Lowthorpe


text:
орунсуз

Adjective

 * 1) inappropriate, improper

title: орунсуз


text: Colimberti

title: Colimberti


text: stananta

title: stananta


text: stanantan

title: stanantan


text: stanantaj

title: stanantaj


text: stanantajn

title: stanantajn


text: staninta

title: staninta


text: stanintan

title: stanintan


text: stanintaj

title: stanintaj


text: stanintajn

title: stanintajn


text: stanonta

title: stanonta


text: stanontan

title: stanontan


text: stanontaj

title: stanontaj


text: stanontajn

title: stanontajn


text: stanatan

title: stanatan


text: stanataj

title: stanataj


text: stanatajn

title: stanatajn


text: stanita

title: stanita


text:
점선

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) dotted line

title: 점선


text: stanitan

title: stanitan


text:
Colla

Etymology
.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Colla is the 41799th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 520 individuals. Colla is most common among White (84.42%) individuals.

title: Colla


text: stanitaj

title: stanitaj


text: stanitajn

title: stanitajn


text:
barłożyć

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to lie around, to lie in, to sprawl

title: barłożyć


text: stanota

title: stanota


text: Zighetti

title: Zighetti


text: stanotan

title: stanotan


text: stanotaj

title: stanotaj


text: stanotajn

title: stanotajn


text: สมฺมาสมฺพุทฺธ

title: สมฺมาสมฺพุทฺธ


text:
quaintance

Noun

 * 1)  acquaintance

title: quaintance


text: 點線

title: 點線


text: stananto

title: stananto


text: stananton

title: stananton


text:
quainted

Adjective

 * 1)  acquainted

title: quainted


text: stanantoj

title: stanantoj


text: stanantojn

title: stanantojn


text: staninto

title: staninto


text: staninton

title: staninton


text: stanintoj

title: stanintoj


text: stanintojn

title: stanintojn


text: stanonto

title: stanonto


text: stanonton

title: stanonton


text: stanontoj

title: stanontoj


text:
živjeli

Etymology
From.

Interjection

 * 1) the usual toast when drinking alcohol

Usage notes
The grammatically correct forms are
 * To a single man: živio
 * To a single woman: živjela
 * To a group of men: živjeli
 * To a group of women: živjele

title: živjeli


text: stanontojn

title: stanontojn


text:
Φραταφέρνης

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * : Phrataphernes, a satrap of Parthia and Hyrcania

title: Φραταφέρνης


text:
quaintlike

Adjective

 * 1) Somewhat quaint

title: quaintlike


text:
ferðamannastraumur

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stream of tourists

title: ferðamannastraumur


text: Luxulyan

title: Luxulyan


text: stanaton

title: stanaton


text: stanatoj

title: stanatoj


text: stanatojn

title: stanatojn


text: stanito

title: stanito


text: staniton

title: staniton


text:
qualitive

Adjective

 * 1) qualitative

title: qualitive


text: stanitoj

title: stanitoj


text:
turiststrøm

Noun

 * 1) stream of tourists

Noun

 * 1) stream of tourists

title: turiststrøm


text: stanitojn

title: stanitojn


text: stanoto

title: stanoto


text: stanoton

title: stanoton