text:
Talk:negre

RFV discussion: March–July 2021
Old French entry was removed by. Please discuss here and decide. 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 16:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Really not sure what there is to discuss. "Negre" simply did not exist in Old French; it was borrowed later from Spanish. The very same source that the current wiki entry provides says so itself: "Empr. à l'esp. negro «personne de race noire» (xves., v. Cor.-Pasc. et Al.)", or in English "Borrowed from Spanish negro "black person" (15th century, cf. Corominas Pascual, among others)."

 * I can only assume whoever added 'negre' under Old French either cannot read French, and so didn't understand the source, or misunderstood what Old French means. (The late fifteenth century falls under Middle French). The Nicodene (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's just the usual procedure, if people find older attestations they can add them and raise objections here. As you say, that is unlikely in this case and so the entry will eventually be deleted. Entries aren't directly deleted if the problem is that their attestation is in doubt. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  16:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Fair enough. I suppose the entry can simply be corrected rather than deleted outright.The Nicodene (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , it looks to me that the current Middle French entry is acceptable. Do you agree? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @Metaknowledge Yes, I think so too. The Nicodene (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC) The Nicodene (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

 * RFV resolved. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:08, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Nom/acc.
@Mahagaja To be clear, Occitan can equally well derive from  or, as far as the sound-changes are concerned. (Cf. > Occit. veire.) Considering that Old Occitan had a nominative/accusative (cas sujet/cas régime) case system,  might as well reflect a confluence of the Latin forms. Nicodene (talk) 20:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * In etymology sections, it makes more sense to say that one entire lexical item (as represented by its lemma form) is derived from another entire lexical item (as represented by its lemma form), rather than saying a specific form is derived from another specific form. Thus, we're not saying that the specific form negre comes from the specific form niger or nigrum; rather, we're saying that the Occitan word for 'black' (whose "front man" happens to be the form negre) comes from the Latin word for 'black' (whose "front man" happens to be the form niger). This is why I have long been opposed to using Latin infinitives in the etymology sections of Romance verbs, namely that we should be using the lemma form (which for Latin verbs is the 1st person singular present active indicative, e.g. amō) rather than the specific form that the modern Romance lemma forms happen to derive from (the infinitive, e.g. amāre). I'd only make an exception in instances where the lemma form comes from an unexpected source (for example, the numerous western Romance personal names like Carlos and Charles that come from the Latin nominative rather than the usual accusative) or in cases of suppletion (it makes sense to say that specific forms of ir and aller come from specific forms of Latin verbs). —Mahāgaja · talk 21:10, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Mahagaja I'm not aware of a single Romance etymological dictionary that specifies Latin verbs in their 1SG present indicative form, so you'd be going against thoroughly-established practice there. Supplying the infinitive, while still linking to the Latin lemma form, has quite strong support here as well, and you'd need a stronger argument than 'I don't like the link displaying a non-lemma' to change it. Anyway, it does not matter for negre in particular, so I'll leave it as-is. Nicodene (talk) 21:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * There are definitely a lot of Romance verb etymologies that give the Latin verb in the lemma form. —Mahāgaja · talk 21:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Mahagaja Any example of a noteworthy Romance etymological dictionary that does so? Nicodene (talk) 21:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:negre


text:
tallārñe

Noun

 * 1) misery

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: tallārñe


text:
獸藥

Noun

 * 1) veterinary medicine

title: 獸藥


text:
Império Mongol

Proper noun

 * 1)  Mongol Empire

title: Império Mongol


text: 兽药

title: 兽药


text: shòuyào

title: shòuyào


text:
alumọkọrọyi

Etymology
, with a fused definite article.

Noun

 * 1) craftiness, cunningness, shrewdness

title: alumọkọrọyi


text:
Talk:elliptic curve

RFD discussion: July–September 2021
SoP. Guaihirr (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 * Strong keep. I don't think it's obvious what an elliptic curve is just by looking at elliptic & curve, and it's its own concept altogether. AG202 (talk) 13:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong keep for the above reasons. Overlordnat1 (talk) 13:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep. Well-known specific mathematical concept. Equinox ◑ 21:28, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Equinox. PUC – 23:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. A no-brainer decision. DonnanZ (talk) 13:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Kept technical term. DAVilla 12:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:elliptic curve


text:
Talk:come to power

RFD discussion: June–September 2021
SOP. 2A02:2788:A4:205:EC01:FB23:BEB8:84A3 13:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. See come to. (By the way, not sure if IP votes count.) ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  18:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * What am I supposed to see there? PUC – 15:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 19:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Imetsia (talk) 16:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Fytcha (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Overlordnat1 (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Kept with little in the way of discussion from either side. DAVilla 12:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:come to power


text:
Talk:antiRoman

RFD discussion: July 2020–September 2021
Delete as a rare misspelling of anti-Roman. does not easily find any actual uses, non-scannos, unlike. does find surprisingly many hits, but from randomly checking Google Books, these would be scannos. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:15, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep. Not a misspelling. J3133 (talk) 14:32, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It is a misspelling since 1) in English, it is very rare to have anti-X for X being a nation name spelled as antiX; 2) somewhat speculatively, there is likely a very unfavorable frequency ratio of antiRoman to anti-Roman in Google Books, despite what GNV shows; this is suggested by inspecting and by the fact that the attesting quotations from antiRoman are solely from Usenet; the spelling is hard to find (or impossible?) in copyedited Google Books. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * antiX being rare does not make it a misspelling; it is a rare alternative form. J3133 (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Is concieve a misspelling or a "rare alternative form" and why? (It has been my position that relative frequency helps detect misspellings; if anything can be labeled "rare alternative form" regardless of relative frequency, this detection criterion breaks down.) --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know about "antiRoman" specifically, but I know for sure I've encountered similar things (e.g. unEnglish) in edited writing. —Mahāgaja · talk 14:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * unEnglish seems to be a misspelling as well, but that would be for a separate RFD. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * An important difference is that concieve changes the letters of the word, whereas antiX changes only the punctuation, which tends to be more variable. J3133 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Even so, what makes concieve mis- (erroneous) rather than alternative even if rare given that you disregard relative frequency? --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Infrequency may help detect misspellings but a word being infrequent does not assure that the word is a misspelling because not all infrequent words are misspellings. J3133 (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The heuristic I proposed is that if a form is very similar to another form with the same meaning but is vanishingly rarer, the rare form should be treated as a misspelling. This works only for forms that are very similar to other forms, e.g. antiRoman vs. anti-Roman and concieve vs. conceive. Thus, the frequency of a form is not considered on its own but rather in relation to frequency of another form. Thus is addressed the above objection that "not all infrequent words are misspellings". --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * That does not ensure that all of the detected words using that system would be misspellings, though. J3133 (talk) 08:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * himand was deleted as a misspelling; should it have been? himand differes from "him and" only by typesetting error, by lacking space rather than by change in letter sequence; and spaces can vary in general, such as appletree vs. apple tree. antiRoman differs from anti-Roman only by typesetting error, by lacking hyphen rather than by change in letter sequence. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * There is no rule that would apply to all words equally; whether it is an “error” is someone’s opinion. J3133 (talk) 09:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Question unanswered. Let's try another: What is an example of a form that you think Wiktionary should track as misspelling and why? --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Evidence from copyedited corpora suggests copyeditors consider antiRoman to be an erroneous spelling. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * (outdent) In 2014 and early 2015, we deleted a host of terms via RFV, as per Talk:antiZionism: antiChinese, antiArabism, antiBritish, antiDarwinist, antiMarkovnikov, antiRussian, antiZionistic. They may be attested in non-copyedited corpus such as Usenet; my position is that these are misspellings rather than rare alternative spellings. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, rare misspelling. PUC – 09:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 15:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep (all words in all languages) and add a definition. SemperBlotto (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep — Dentonius 15:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. What have the antiRomans ever done... ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  15:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete —Suzukaze-c (talk) 03:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as a typo, trivially understandable as prefix +, only minus the hyphen.  Outside of a very few words, camelCase is never used in any form of English that is not regarded broadly as mistaken somehow, so even if we were to keep the entry, it would merit labels qualifying it as proscribed.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 03:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't care. Context dependent SOP anyway. AntiRoman Catholic? AntiRoman Goths sacking Rome? AntiRoman Italian protesters demonstrating against the government? Facts707 (talk) 03:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Camel case is informal and easily implies hyphenation. DAVilla 19:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete because I do think this one is a misspelling; some other instances of CamelCase, like antiSemitic or Talk:unEnglish, seem different, IMO. - -sche (discuss) 18:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 04:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:antiRoman


text:
otente

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) climax, apex

title: otente


text:
täp-

Verb

 * 1) to proclaim, announce

title: täp-


text: Flanders poppies

title: Flanders poppies


text:
temeñ

Adverb

 * 1) consequently, because of that

title: temeñ


text:
português brasileiro

Noun

 * 1) Brazilian Portuguese Portuguese spoken and written in Brazil

title: português brasileiro


text:
Talk:गच्छ्

RFD discussion: May–September 2021
According to, should this be discussed first or should it be speedily deleted? Kutchkutch (talk) 07:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Should have been discussed first. The thing with this root is, MW does not give it a separate entry but does mention it under the root . The reason is, the verb गच्छति needs to be classified and for reasons unknown, there is no class in Sanskrit for -ccha- formations. It baffles me why Panini would not make a separate class for these verbs when there are a handful of them in Sanskrit. So any dictionarian who wants to classify this verb needs to construct a root gacch and make gacchati its primary (class 1, parasmaipada) derivative.
 * I won't vote either keep or delete because I can see both sides of the argument and am not particularly for or against this root, but I just want to make clear that if this root is to be deleted, then the class parameter should also be removed from the entry because it is not the class 1 formation of ; that one is . -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 08:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I marked it for immediate deletion because if गच्छ् is a root, then so are तिष्ठ्, यच्छ्, and many more. I still vote delete. 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 09:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I know. I'm just saying that if this root is deleted, then even the part where it says "class 1 P" should be removed. The etymology should be purely from PII and PIE and no synchornic analysis is possible for it in that case. We can mention the root it is associated with (that is, ) at the most. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 08:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Then the class should be removed for यच्छति and तिष्ठति too? 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 09:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Right. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 09:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * By the way what's your vote, : keep or delete? —Svārtava2 • 04:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete, it's not a root, it's a present stem. —Mahāgaja · talk 11:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * As there are several irregular Class 1 formations, I don't see why gam can't have multiple Class 1 stems. Whitney records the root sañj as forming both sajati and sajjati.  Accentually, the formations in -ccha- are a mixture of Class 1 and Class 6, so Panini would have needed two classes for them. As far as I am aware, gacch hasn't really achieved root status in Sanskrit, but apparently similar formations have.  However, quite a lot of material out there refers to 'gacch' as a Sanskrit root.  I think we should treat it as we treat misspellings - say that calling it a root is a misinterpretation, and refer the reader on to gam.  Or is my suggestion invalid because our Sanskrit entries are not meant to be helpful?  Do we perhaps need rather to change the language from Sanskrit to English?  (What is there to stop the English language inventing Sanskrit roots and writing them in the Devanagari script?) --RichardW57m (talk) 12:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. --RichardW57m (talk) 12:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Whatever we do with Sanskrit gacchati, we must link it to gam at the Sanskrit level, because other verbal and deverbal forms are formed from the root gam. Treat it as suppletive if you wish, but maintain the link. --RichardW57m (talk) 12:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 08:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. Imetsia (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:गच्छ्


text:
whitefisher

Noun

 * 1) One who fishes for whitefish.

title: whitefisher


text: whitefishers

title: whitefishers


text:
whitefishery

Noun

 * 1) The industry of fishing for whitefish.

title: whitefishery


text: whitefisheries

title: whitefisheries


text:
Rhymes talk:Spanish/ismo

RFD discussion: March 2020–September 2021
I created this Rhymes page a while ago not realising that the letter s in Spanish becomes IPA z when it comes before a voiced consonant, such as m. Therefore, the correct rhyme page is Rhymes:Spanish/izmo. Sorry for that. Pablussky (talk) 09:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Not all accents of Spanish pronounce "sm" as [zm], and in any case, the voicing of /s/ to [z] here is only an allophonic detail: /sm/ is still fine as a representation of the phonemes in the consonant cluster.--Urszag (talk) 09:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * But note that there is already a page for the /izmo/ pronunciation, and it is more complete. So I say merge to /izmo/. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 21:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I particularly don't like using phonetic details for rhymes..., what do you think? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Neither do I, especially because of dialectal variation as Urszag points out. I think we should move Rhymes:Spanish/að et al. Ultimateria (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'll leave it in your hands: as far as I'm concerned, you can either create a discussion about it, or just do the move (because I don't anticipate any opposition). But after the move, it would be good for someone with a bot to update the links. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

 * RFD-kept; Rhymes:Spanish/izmo was merged into Rhymes:Spanish/ismo. Ultimateria (talk) 17:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Rhymes talk:Spanish/ismo


text:
Template talk:nickname

RFD discussion: July–September 2021
should be deleted because the name is inconsistent with its use. It is a redirect to, yet nicknames are not restricted to cities. Many other things have nicknames, from people, companies, families, government leadership positions, states, provinces, countries, etc. Either the redirect needs to be converted to allow the selection of what kind of nickname it is being used for, or it should be deleted. -- 65.93.183.191 23:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ie. : —

 * would introduce a "type" parameter for selection of what kind of nickname is being described.
 * -- 65.93.183.191 23:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

 * Speedy deleted as unwanted redirect. Ultimateria (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Template talk:nickname


text:
Category talk:Tbot entries

RFD discussion: August–September 2021
Well, I emptied out all the entries after 14 years. Any remaining were sent to RFV. We can probably delete any other Tbot maintenance stuff Wubble You (talk) 12:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 * Actually, there's one remaining at ھەردەم. I'll leave that Wubble You (talk) 12:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 * Deleted out of process by . I'm not sure that was especially wise, as there are still some Tbot entries that have yet to be checked and detagged. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 * Yes, perhaps WF’s speedy deletion requests should have been changed to RFDs. If there are categories that were deleted and are still needed for checking and detaging, feel free to undelete them. Category:Tbot entries January 2008 and Category:Tbot entries (Northern Kurdish) may require further attention. Kutchkutch (talk) 04:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 * Although the following categories appeared to be empty when nominated for speedy deletion, they have been undeleted for now as they are not empty:

 * Category:Tbot_entries
 * Category:Tbot_entries_February_2008
 * Category:Tbot_entries_April_2008
 * Category:Tbot_entries_December_2008
 * Category:Tbot entries_January 2009
 * Category:Tbot entries_May 2009
 * Category:Tbot_entries_December_2009
 * Category:Tbot_entries_July_2010

 * Category:Tbot_entries_(Northern Kurdish) was recreated by WF. Template:tbotcatboiler has been restored since it is still being transcluded. Kutchkutch (talk) 12:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 * I am adding apparent Arabic sources to some of these Kurdish words. I do not know Kurdish so I can not vouch for the existence of the words.  But they are plausible given that the Ottomans and others spread words with similar sound and meaning around the region.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 15:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 * Kept for now. Can be easily speedied if it gets emptied Roger the Rodger (talk) 19:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Tbot entries


text:
Category talk:Tamilism

Category:en:Tamilism
Not in the category structure. But do we actually think there are enough entries to make keeping this worthwhile? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Such things created by non-longstanding editors should be deleted on sight. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  14:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

 * Deleted out of process by . —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Would Category:Tamil Nadu be a suitable replacement for entries such as:
 * Tamil Tiger, Tamilian, etc.
 * Or should the erstwhile Category:en:Tamilism be repurposed for with entries related to, or  such as:
 * Dravidian. Dravidianism, Dravidianist, Proto-Dravidian, etc.
 * ? Kutchkutch (talk) 13:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Tamil Tiger is a thing related to Ceylon, not Indian Tamil. is no different from  or  or  or  or  or what not; we have no precedence for having ethnic-based categories, as we are not a database site, we keep categories as long as they are linguistically significant. Note that Tamil ≠ Dravidian. Would you seriously consider classifying Brahui under the ‘Tamil’ banner? Tamil Nationalism is as dangerous as Hindi Nationalism or Bengali Nationalism, and you will often see illiterates hailing from these dominant cultures trying to further their nationalistic cause.  ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  14:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the elaborate response here and at WT:Requests_for_deletion/English. User:VelKadamban also created Category:Tamilism (without text) and added Tamilism to Template:list:religions/en. Kutchkutch (talk) 03:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted. Ultimateria (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Tamilism


text:
Category talk:Conspiracy theories

RFD discussion: March–August 2021
Hardcore POV categorization. One could understand this category as containing all terms denoting a concept of a conspiracy, but he who devised this name is decided to insert encyclopedic stances with this category. Another frequent editor the category in a term denoting an alleged phenomenon where promotion or progression of a demographic is excluded in a way of a hidden barrier by another demographic, to promote the view that “gender discrimination is real”. What does it even mean that gender discrimination is real? Even if it is, and I will concede that much (probably considering it just; depends also on what discrimination even is), it does not mean that every use of this term refers to a real thing; this a priori clear from its character as a metaphor for sundry purposes, and sure feminists are unable to form conspiracy theories? Aren’t feminist theory and gender studies the foremost source to find crackpottery in it, centered around blaming patriarchy in various imaginations?

There is a difference of true and false, I am even a particular fan of it and not someone who tries to deconstruct it, but this cannot be the basis for categorization. Not only is it contentious, and surely we have no interest in discussing which is real, but the term is independent of that.

What we categorize by a category of a dictionary entry is the concept behind the term, what people thought when saying a word and not what really happened, not the noumenon behind the phenomenon, so here is the transgression, here lies the fallacy in ascribing the additional value of truth to these concepts, or assuming of a dictionary editor that he does so by his categorizations.

So you may suppose I deem the real. Yet I have no reservation to speak of a conspiracy theory here. Obviously conspiracies can be true and are commonly accepted as true; if what is called conspiracy theory then is not, or even “implied” not to be, if the term is used and interpreted in partisan modes in disregard of its signification, to prove with its imagined but uncertain idiomatic meaning one’s weltanschauung, why should we use this term? It is too Janus-faced. If the editors, the more so the foremost ones, cannot apply this term in a waterproof way, and readers fail to reap the benefits from it due to not finding it in a reasonable compass and inclining towards argument in consequence of equivocal wording, it should be cast out of the categories – whether somehow replaced or not. Fay Freak (talk) 02:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Can you please downgrade your "en-4: This user has near native speaker knowledge of English"? You are near-incomprehensible. Equinox ◑ 07:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes please. Fay, your English is objectively speaking not native level. You say a lot of weird stuff that clearly gives away that, in addition to your strange affectations, you are not a native speaker. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 05:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, as the person who distinguished "real and fake", and who continues to do so despite efforts to mix the two. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Related: Category:en:Pseudoscience. I have sometimes wondered about this one because it feels like doing a public duty to indicate that something like reiki is just feel-good nonsense, but I suppose there is a real question around how far we categorise without making "value judgements". Equinox ◑ 08:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't know what the intention of this category was; if it's just to laundry-list conspiracy theories, we're better served with List_of_conspiracy_theories. If it's used to describe subtle language changes employed by promoters of such theories it might be more interesting. Regardless, we'll end up with time-wasting WT:POINTy discussions like this one. – Jberkel 09:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Keep: We shouldn't be afraid to make epistemic judgements while categorising. WT:NPOV exists, but it lacks real teeth outside of a few topics (language definition, usage notes, headwords, and regional spelling/lexical differences). Instead, our present system of categorisation makes epistemological demarcations that go far above and beyond "some people think that it ought to be in there", even if only by implicit consensus. For instance, many creationists would love to have in Category:en:Geology and  in Category:en:Taxonomy. That's just as well; even creationists would be loath to let the imbecile who thinks that an owl is a kind of fish or that Rwanda is a city steer the course of categorisation.

 * By refusing to lay down boundaries dealing with what's real and what just ain't, we are seen by our users as believing that judgements are superfluous and that anyone's half-formed conceits are a fine substitute for the truth. We may recognise that that isn't what we're doing, but the average user won't; no matter what we do, we can't but judge. I'm not saying that we shouldn't be hesitant to veer into idiosyncrasy when a category has a definition "understanded of the people", or that we should stir up needless controversy with little relation to building a dictionary. We just mustn't let the fear of Scylla drive us into the waiting maw of Charybdis. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 10:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 * As for the definition of, most people understand the term to exclude conspiracies which are widely accepted to exist. Our definition only alludes to this indirectly, by beginning with 'A hypothesis... (rather than, say, A theory...); it should probably be clearer. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 10:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Delete: The category includes both Area 51 and QAnon, and yet the current definition of the former reads almost like a description of the meme, not some belief in classified contact between alien-carrying UFOs and the US government.
 * There seems to me to be no consistently followed application of the word conspiracy here, but rather a collection of names for various accusations of "secrecy" or "concealment" (like Area 51), and in particular "secretly planned harm" (like red mercury and plandemic), or, alternatively, hostility toward Jews in general (like blood libel). The latter type, if applied to other religions or ethnicities, would turn the category into a list of racist branding and allegations, at least insofar as these allegations involve an element of "scheming to cause large-scale damage".
 * I personally recommend splitting the items that are currently in this category. Blood libel, for example, could be moved to a category for antisemitism instead of one for a "conspiracy theory", while Area 51 and QAnon could be moved to categories somehow related to aliens and Satanism respectively.
 * Also, the definition of "Area 51" probably needs to be changed. Roger.M.Williams (talk) 13:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and split. The current category appears to be a mishmash of classic urban legends (man in black, Illuminatus), 21st century U.S. politics (birther, deather, QAnon), pseudoscience (coronasceptic, flat-earthism), and widely believed and probably real phenomena which cannot be scientifically proven to the critics' satisfaction (bamboo ceiling, deep state); in other words, the current category is useless. I would suggest moving the current entries to Category:Pseudoscience, Category:Politics, Category:Racism, Category:Antisemitism etc., and maybe introduce Category:Urban legends for the remainder. Tetromino (talk) 14:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 * To clarify my suggestion, I'll try to exemplify it using the five entries I have mentioned that are currently in this category. In addition to what Tetromino has said, the Italicized words in my definitions below are, to me, a useful guide that may help categorize the entries so that, on their model, all the entries that are currently labeled what roughly signifies "a scheme done by a number of people to cause damage, usually on a large scale" may instead be moved to more meaningful categories (that is, ones that may be adequately linked to each of them).
 * Area 51: a US facility in Nevada whose name has become associated with classified undertakings with extraterrestrials. It is a "theory" (that is, a view, perhaps held assertively) about surreptitious operations related to aliens, in particular UFOs.
 * Suggestion: adding it to a category about "extraterrestrials", "aliens", "UFOs", "the United States of America", and/or "Nevada"
 * QAnon: the "theory" (that is, the idea, the attitude) that a Satanistic, cannibalistic, and/or pedophilic cabal is in control of the US government and possibly other governments too and that Donald Trump has been working to expose this and to thwart the cabal's efforts. The name of this "theory" derives from an anonymous poster on 4chan who later moved to 8chan.
 * Suggestion: adding it to a category about "Satanism", "cannibalism", "pedophilia", "cabals", "the United States of America", "Donald Trump", "4chan", and/or "8chan"
 * red mercury: the name of a red-colored chemical substances that purportedly plays a central role in the manufacturing of nuclear weapons
 * Suggestion: adding it to a category about "nuclear weapons"
 * plandemic: the "theory" (that is, the idea, the attitude) that some pandemic is humanly made (that is, manufactured), planned, or orchestrated
 * Suggestion: adding it to a category about "pandemics" and/or "diseases" (through extraction from the italicized word "pandemic" above)
 * blood libel: the accusation that Jews may abduct the children of non-Jews to murder them in their secretive religious rituals
 * Suggestion: adding it to a category about "Judaism", "antisemitism" (through extraction from the italicized words "abduct", "children", and "murder" above), and/or "cabals" (through extraction from the italicized phrase "secretive religious rituals").
 * As for the other entries, some terms may warrant having their own categories (for example, Illuminati), while others may be added to the entry conspiracy theory itself in the "See also" section (for example, truther), and yet a number of terms currently in the category (such as flat-earthism) do not even include an element of "scheming to cause damage" at all (unlike, for example, blood libel or even Pizzagate). Roger.M.Williams (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I conclude from this that you have some misunderstandings about how our categorisation system works. The idea is that if someone is interested in a topic, they should be presented with a list of terms directly relating to that topic. Let's just take QAnon as an example. It is a theory about the US government, but it does not directly relate to the US as a nation. If we put anything that tenuously related to the US in Category:en:United States, it would be a useless category. Similarly, the theory claims that paedophilia is going on, but its claims are false and aren't central to its political narrative; if someone goes to Category:en:Pedophilia, they are looking for terms relating to actual paedophiles, not conspiracy theories that incorporate the idea of pedophilia. But what if someone is interested in conspiracy theories? In that case, QAnon is exactly the sort of entry they're looking for. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I meant my suggestions about the five terms above as possibilities. Tetromino, for example, suggested moving it to Category:en:Politics. But either way, I feel that both are more "meaningful", at least since they somehow relate to how one would define it in a way that one can coherently group it with other entries (whether they are about politics, the US, or US politics). I think the only suggestion I actually personally favor is Category:Antisemitism. "Antipathy toward Jews" is much more differentiable, and I imagine that Jews and maybe even antisemites would eagerly verify whether a term warrants inclusion.
 * Regardless, focusing on discreditedness or the falsity of its claims does not seem to pertain to the compound "conspiracy theory", which I have tried to define above as clandestinity with harmful intentions, a label that is so broad that following whatever seems to "fit" it would result in adding so many disparate and contrasting terms: QAnon may have been falsified, but what about red mercury or even Area 51? That Area 51 is classified renders any "theory" about it virtually unfalsifiable. Would a Cartesian evil genius or even solipsism be "conspiracy theories"? Colin seems to lean toward describing application only, but I personally doubt that they would not be called so when explained to non-philosophers, and they would most likely be called so if you somehow add "the government" or even "aliens" to the mix. But these are just my own speculations. Application of the compound would probably vary a lot regardless, and perceived credibility or falsity seems to play a very little role, if any.
 * In short, many of the so-called "conspiracy theories" are unverifiable and/or unfalsifiable, thus taking away even further from the value of a category about defamatory accusations. That is, there is no "truth" to defend in these cases since the whole thing is an accusation and roughly amounts to libel or slandering or is comparable to it (unlike, for example, Category:en:Pseudoscience, which is to me more distinguishable because it pertains to science). And so, at least to me, it appears to me to be more convenient to split the charges, allegations, and propaganda into seemingly relevant "types" (for instance, blaming Jews for this, charging the US government with that, accusing NASA of such and such) instead of lumping them all together because they "may" be named "conspiracy theories" or because they are concern a concealed or distorted operation or "plot". And as for falsity, this can be marked in the definition instead of the category. But of course, however you do any of this is another matter. Roger.M.Williams (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 * It is a crude way of thinking that terms could be “directly related to a topic”. Why wouldn’t your favourite genocide (forgive the term!) be directly related to the topic? It depends on your subjective definition of your topic again. But a definition which also includes commonly accepted conspiracies is not unlikely for other subjects that browse the dictionary, for why would it only be the most unlikely ones? And why wouldn’t be related to the topic of conspiracy theories? It’s strongly related to it, for for bare people in the South of Germany and in the United States the only thing they know is that it  (unlike in the apparently smarter Iran where man at least knows ). How often have I read from people on the internet: “You are from Bielefeld? Sure you are trying to impose upon me!” “Bielefeld doesn’t exist!” (Same people also contended that I can’t be native German but “more like from Minnesota”, “an American larping as German” because I speak too artificial and dialect-free German; apparently I am a native speaker of nothing, ; it appears that languages are also conspiracies to which I am not privy, and for every country the other half of the country is perceived as a conspiracy. ) Fay Freak (talk) 15:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I would appeal here to Wikipedia's concept of "verifiability, not truth". Or, since we're on Wiktionary, it might be more apt to call it "descriptivism, not truth". So, for example, it's not our place to analyse the studies and statistics that have been published around the compensation and promotion of women in the workplace to determine whether the glass ceiling is real or false (and therefore a conspiracy theory). Rather, it's a conspiracy theory if people commonly describe it as such. ("commonly" is important here. It's not sufficient that there's a small fringe that uses the label.) All of the terms currently in Category:en:Conspiracy theories seem to satisfy this criterion (or are terms that are commonly used in relation to conspiracy theories, e.g. tinfoil hatter). Colin M (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Which sounds like work and would introduce . I wouldn’t be that sure either that one couldn’t verify by publications from the environs of Vrij Historisch Onderzoek that is called a conspiracy theory. Then one would start classifying and excluding sources based on reputability etc. what we so far wanted to avoid on Wiktionary, as this is all remote from dictionary interest. Fay Freak (talk) 15:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's as difficult as you're making it sound. If I take something like "Area 51", and look up articles about it in mainstream sources (Encyclopedia Britannica, The New York Times, Fox News, whatever) they more-often-than-not use the term 'conspiracy theory' in relation to it. If I repeat this exercise for "glass ceiling" or "shoah", none of them use that term. I see no ambiguity in these cases. For cases where there is any ambiguity, they should not go in the category. death panel is such an example - many sources describe it as false or discredited (even a "myth"), but few describe it as a "conspiracy theory". It should go to Category:en:US politics (deep state probably should as well). I was going to suggest a subcat for contentious US political terms, but looking at the US politics cat, maybe that's almost redundant... Colin M (talk) 20:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * IMO we should distinguish in our category system between
 * terms for conspiracy narratives
 * terms that describe (aspects of) conspiracy narratives
 * terms that have specific meanings, or are exclusively used, in the context of specific conspiracy narratives
 * Lumping all this together in one category isn't helpful and blurs the lines between the description of lunatic thinking and lunatic thinking itself. --Akletos (talk) 07:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is not an unreasonable idea, but it's swimming against the current of how categorization is currently done on Wiktionary. Basically all of our topic categories suffer from this kind of conflation. For example, Category:en:Prison includes 1) terms for prisons 2) terms that describe aspects/features of prisons and imprisonment, and 3) terms used within prisons. A little while back I did some work to try to migrate most of the terms in the third group to Category:English prison slang. You could try to do something similar for "Conspiracy theorist slang", but I'm not sure it would be useful, especially since the conspiracy theory category is currently not very big. I would say Wiktionary focuses more on categorizing by 'metadata' (part of speech, register, region, countability, transitivity...) rather than meaning, and I think that's a good thing. Colin M (talk) 19:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes, maintaining the category is going to involve a regrettable degree of political judgement, but it is in principle a useful dictinction to make. That said, there is merit to Akletos' proposal for splitting. The question is whether there will be agreement on appropriate and practical category names and whether there should be a single overarching category. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  13:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 * The general issue of our categorization system not always distinguishing different, erm, categories of things—terms about X vs terms for X, etc—is probably due for another discussion in the BP; I will start one shortly. One proposal in the past was to use names like "Category:en:Topic:Prison" for terms relating to the topic of prison vs "Category:en:Set:Prison" for a set of names of prisons like Alcatraz and Rikers Island and Sing Sing (and then something like Colin's "Category:English prison slang" for terms used chiefly in prisons). As for this specific category, I guess it's a reasonable category, even if it's a bit fuzzy as to when something is a conspiracy theory vs (e.g.) just an urban legend or "just" an antisemitic lie. If Nazis try to add the Holocaust or other real phenomena to it, we can just block them. - -sche (discuss) 01:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's worth noting that attempts to use categories to group together terms that have similar referents will probably end up having significant overlap with WT:Thesaurus. Colin M (talk) 02:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 * No consensus to delete. I see three explicit votes to keep, three explicit votes to delete (including the OP), and several comments, most of which seem to vaguely support the existence of the category. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:32, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Conspiracy theories


text:
Category talk:en:Tamilism

RFD discussion: August–September 2021

 * See Category talk:Tamilism.

title: Category talk:en:Tamilism


text:
ⲡⲉⲣⲥⲉⲫⲟⲛⲏ

Etymology
From

Proper noun

 * 1)  Persephone, the Greek goddess of death and queen of the underworld.

title: ⲡⲉⲣⲥⲉⲫⲟⲛⲏ


text:
pọnun

Etymology
.

title: pọnun


text:
wholesalely

Adverb

 * 1) In a wholesale or indiscriminate manner.

title: wholesalely


text:
amele

Etymology
From, from , plural of.

Noun

 * 1) worker, laborer

title: amele


text:
tᵤmāne

Numeral

 * 1) ten thousand, a myriad

title: tᵤmāne


text:
sakaani

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) neighborhood, vicinity, region, area

title: sakaani


text:
whiteroot

Noun

 * 1) The plant.

title: whiteroot


text:
tumeṃ

Adverb

 * 1) then, thereupon

title: tumeṃ


text:
அருள்

Etymology
Related to. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to bestow, to give, to provide

Noun

 * 1) grace, mercy, favor, benevolence
 * 2) good deeds
 * 3) order, command
 * 4) brightness, radiance
 * 1) order, command
 * 2) brightness, radiance
 * 1) brightness, radiance

title: அருள்


text:
Whitmanish

Adjective

 * 1) Characteristic of the American poet  (1819–1892).

title: Whitmanish


text: memorizzatori

title: memorizzatori


text: Emersonism

title: Emersonism


text:
User:YousuhrNaym/HSK6

New HSK lists

HSK Beginner (levels 1-3): all

HSK Intermediate (levels 4-6): level 4, level 5, level 6 (here)

HSK Advanced (levels 7-9): a-h, j-s, sh-zh

level 6

 * 1) (pronoun, adverb)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (classifier)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (counter)
 * 8) (as in )
 * 9) (verb)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (noun)
 * 13) (auxiliary)
 * 14) (adjective)
 * 15) (as in )
 * 16) (as in )
 * 1) (pronoun, adverb)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (classifier)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (counter)
 * 8) (as in )
 * 9) (verb)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (noun)
 * 13) (auxiliary)
 * 14) (adjective)
 * 15) (as in )
 * 16) (as in )
 * 1) (classifier)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (classifier)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (counter)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (auxiliary)
 * 13) (adjective)
 * 14) (as in )
 * 15) (as in )
 * 1) (classifier)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (classifier)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (counter)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (auxiliary)
 * 13) (adjective)
 * 14) (as in )
 * 15) (as in )
 * 1) (classifier)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (classifier)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (counter)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (auxiliary)
 * 13) (adjective)
 * 14) (as in )
 * 15) (as in )
 * 1) (classifier)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (classifier)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (counter)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (auxiliary)
 * 13) (adjective)
 * 14) (as in )
 * 15) (as in )
 * 1) (classifier)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (classifier)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (counter)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (auxiliary)
 * 13) (adjective)
 * 14) (as in )
 * 15) (as in )
 * 1) (classifier)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (classifier)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (counter)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (auxiliary)
 * 13) (adjective)
 * 14) (as in )
 * 15) (as in )
 * 1) (classifier)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (classifier)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (counter)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (noun)
 * 12) (auxiliary)
 * 13) (adjective)
 * 14) (as in )
 * 15) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (classifier)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (counter)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (noun)
 * 10) (noun)
 * 11) (auxiliary)
 * 12) (adjective)
 * 13) (as in )
 * 14) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (counter)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (noun)
 * 9) (auxiliary)
 * 10) (adjective)
 * 11) (as in )
 * 12) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (counter)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (noun)
 * 8) (auxiliary)
 * 9) (adjective)
 * 10) (as in )
 * 11) (as in )
 * 1) (counter)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (auxiliary)
 * 8) (adjective)
 * 9) (as in )
 * 10) (as in )
 * 1) (counter)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (auxiliary)
 * 8) (adjective)
 * 9) (as in )
 * 10) (as in )
 * 1) (counter)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (noun)
 * 7) (auxiliary)
 * 8) (adjective)
 * 9) (as in )
 * 10) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (noun)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (auxiliary)
 * 7) (adjective)
 * 8) (as in )
 * 9) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (noun)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (auxiliary)
 * 7) (adjective)
 * 8) (as in )
 * 9) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (noun)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (auxiliary)
 * 7) (adjective)
 * 8) (as in )
 * 9) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (noun)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (auxiliary)
 * 7) (adjective)
 * 8) (as in )
 * 9) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (noun)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (auxiliary)
 * 7) (adjective)
 * 8) (as in )
 * 9) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (noun)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (noun)
 * 6) (auxiliary)
 * 7) (adjective)
 * 8) (as in )
 * 9) (as in )
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (noun)
 * 3) (noun)
 * 4) (noun)
 * 5) (auxiliary)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (noun)
 * 3) (auxiliary)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (noun)
 * 3) (auxiliary)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (noun)
 * 3) (auxiliary)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (noun)
 * 3) (auxiliary)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (noun)
 * 3) (auxiliary)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (noun)
 * 3) (auxiliary)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (noun)
 * 3) (auxiliary)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (noun)
 * 2) (auxiliary)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (as in )
 * 1) (auxiliary)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (as in )
 * 1) (auxiliary)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (as in )
 * 1) (auxiliary)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (as in )
 * 1) (auxiliary)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (as in )
 * 1) (auxiliary)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (as in )
 * 1) (auxiliary)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (as in )
 * 1) (auxiliary)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )

title: User:YousuhrNaym/HSK6


text:
wickawee

Noun

 * 1) The plant.

title: wickawee


text:
hauberjoun

Etymology
From, , diminutive of (see 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) habergeon light coat of mail armour

title: hauberjoun


text: aburjoun

title: aburjoun


text: haberjon

title: haberjon


text: habirgeoun

title: habirgeoun


text: habirjoun

title: habirjoun


text: haburgen

title: haburgen


text: haburjon

title: haburjon


text: haburjoun

title: haburjoun


text: haburjoune

title: haburjoune


text: haubercion

title: haubercion


text: haubergeoun

title: haubergeoun


text:
wolii

Etymology
, ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) prophet

title: wolii


text: hawberjoun

title: hawberjoun


text: hauberjown

title: hauberjown


text: hawbyrgon

title: hawbyrgon


text:
who's robbing this coach

Phrase

 * 1)  mind your own business;

title: who's robbing this coach


text: habergeoun

title: habergeoun


text: ghost characters

title: ghost characters


text:
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Chadic/ymn

RFM discussion: March 2020–July 2021
(vol. 3, p. 201) has a whole page dedicated to this complex in Chadic, and concludes that two separate roots have been conflated by Jungraithmayr & Shimizu. Takács reconstructs the form given by the A languages as *h-m (comparing 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc), and the form given by the B languages as *y-m (comparing 🇨🇬). He is not a Chadicist, to be sure, but his collation of sources is very comprehensive, and avoids the otherwise awkward *y > *h that this reconstruction demands. (As an aside, where the hell did they get the third consonant of *y-m-n from when none of the descendants seem to have it?) —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Moved to Reconstruction:Proto-Central Chadic/ɗɨjɨm (based on Gravina 2014). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

title: Reconstruction talk:Proto-Chadic/ymn


text:
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Germanic/liznaną

RFM discussion: June 2021
Since this is attested only in West Germanic, shouldn't it be moved to a Proto-West Germanic form? However, I don't know what the form would be, or  or something else? Also, it's suspicious that Category:Proto-West Germanic class 4 weak verbs is an empty category. Would this be the only member of that class? Or have we simply not yet created PWG entries for class 4 verbs? . —Mahāgaja · talk 10:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I believe that class 4 weak verbs disappeared in West Germanic;  would be class 3 weak (as in OHG). Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 13:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * So does that mean it shifted to /? —Mahāgaja · talk 13:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, as demonstrated by ; in the other West Germanic languages, it shifted to class 2. By the way, I think is better than, as lowering isn't universal in West Germanic (for instance,  doesn't have it). Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 13:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Which, however, looks like a class 2 verb (as do several other attested forms), so maybe class 4 verbs sometimes went to that class too. —Mahāgaja · talk 14:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * In the northern West Germanic languages, most class 3 verbs (like ) show up as class 2; only the four j-presents, , , and remain in a relic class 3. Since OHG, Old Norse, and Gothic keep a full-sized class 3, the shift of class in these verbs must postdate the breakup of PWG. In short, we shouldn't be reconstructing a class 2 . Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 17:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * On further thought, the argument I made isn't watertight, as there could've been dialectal variation already in PWG. However, if you accept that had a northern dialectal form, you have to accept the same for all other class 3 weak verbs except for the j-presents. Personally, I think it's better to write off  as post-PWG. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 17:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Agreed. -- 17:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Ringe states:
 * The fourth class of weak verbs, fientives with presents in *-nō- ~ *-na-, lost their identity as an inflectional class throughout NWGmc, but the outcomes were different in Norse and in WGmc. [...] In WGmc the formation ceased to be productive early, and not even many fossilized examples remain in the attested languages. [...] It is not surprising that the northern WGmc forms of the other verbs listed here are mostly class II weak verbs (as in ON), and perhaps not very surprising that one verb has a strong variant in OE, considering that the entire class exhibits simple thematic inflection in the present in Gothic. The OHG class III weak inflection must reflect the WGmc interchange between weak classes II and III, but it is surprising that all the surviving fientives wound up in class III in OHG.
 * Ringe doesn't make any mention of how the class was represented in PWG, so we're left to guess. But it's clear enough that he doesn't think the class moved to class 3 wholesale, given his "surprise" at the OHG development. Simply said, I think we are unable to confidently reconstruct the full inflection of these verbs. Ringe does, however, reconstruct specifically the infinitives *liznōn (or *liʀnōn in our notation) and *waknōn, so perhaps we can tentatively use the suffix for infinitives of this class. —Rua (mew) 19:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * So how about I move it to and list  as a Weser-Rhine an Elbe Germanic alternative form? —Mahāgaja · talk 19:44, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


text:
சோதனை

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) examination, inspection, trial
 * 2) divine trial
 * 3) sifting, search, investigation
 * 4) temptation
 * 5) assaying metal
 * 1) temptation
 * 2) assaying metal
 * 1) assaying metal

title: சோதனை


text:
whorlywort

Noun

 * 1) The plant.

Synonyms

 * Culver's root,

title: whorlywort


text: hauberjouns

title: hauberjouns


text:
Widbin

Statistics

 * According to data collected by Forebears in 2014, Widbin is the 219877th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 89 individuals.

title: Widbin


text:
totteññe

Noun

 * 1) border

title: totteññe


text:
tompok

Adverb

 * 1) now

title: tompok


text: hauberkes

title: hauberkes


text: auberc

title: auberc


text: haberke

title: haberke


text: hamberk

title: hamberk


text: hauberghe

title: hauberghe


text: haubrec

title: haubrec


text: haubrecke

title: haubrecke


text: haubrek

title: haubrek


text: hawbarke

title: hawbarke


text: hawbergh

title: hawbergh


text: hawberke

title: hawberke


text: Category:English terms suffixed with -cole


text:
ariwa

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) north

title: ariwa


text:
சித்தம்

Noun

 * 1) mind, will
 * 2) determination, firm conviction
 * 3) determinative faculty
 * 1) determinative faculty

Etymology 2
From.

Noun

 * 1) that which is established or attained
 * 2) certainty
 * 3) that which is ready
 * 4)  an ancient Shaiva scripture in Sanskrit
 * 1)  an ancient Shaiva scripture in Sanskrit
 * 1)  an ancient Shaiva scripture in Sanskrit

title: சித்தம்


text:
文化の盗用

Noun

 * 1) cultural appropriation

title: 文化の盗用


text:
文化盗用

Noun

 * 1) cultural appropriation

title: 文化盗用


text:
poliandrio

Etymology
Ultimately derived from +.

Noun

 * 1) polyandry having a plurality of husbands at the same time

title: poliandrio


text:
guusu

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) south

title: guusu


text:
பரலோகம்

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) heaven
 * 2) the world of liberated souls
 * 1) the world of liberated souls

title: பரலோகம்


text:
tletepetl

Noun

 * 1) volcano

title: tletepetl


text:
gabasi

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) east, sunrise

title: gabasi


text: デコピン

title: デコピン


text:
基地局

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  base station

title: 基地局


text:
cacatl

Noun

 * 1) A kind of toad.

title: cacatl


text:
அதிக்கிரமம்

Noun

 * 1) overstepping, going beyond, transgression
 * 2) iniquity
 * 1) iniquity

title: அதிக்கிரமம்


text:
User:YousuhrNaym/HSK5

New HSK lists

HSK Beginner (levels 1-3): all

HSK Intermediate (levels 4-6): level 4, level 5 (here), level 6

HSK Advanced (levels 7-9): a-h, j-s, sh-zh

level 5

 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (preposition)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adjective)
 * 7) (as in )
 * 8) (verb)
 * 9) (adverb)
 * 1) (preposition)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adjective)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (adverb)
 * 1) (preposition)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adjective)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (adverb)
 * 1) (preposition)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adjective)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (adverb)
 * 1) (preposition)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adjective)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (adverb)
 * 1) (preposition)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adjective)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (adverb)
 * 1) (preposition)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adjective)
 * 6) (as in )
 * 7) (verb)
 * 8) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adjective)
 * 5) (as in )
 * 6) (verb)
 * 7) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adjective)
 * 4) (as in )
 * 5) (verb)
 * 6) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adjective)
 * 3) (as in )
 * 4) (verb)
 * 5) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (adjective)
 * 2) (as in )
 * 3) (verb)
 * 4) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (as in )
 * 2) (verb)
 * 3) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)
 * 1) (adverb)

title: User:YousuhrNaym/HSK5


text:
通院

Noun

 * 1) regularly visiting a hospital for treatment

Verb

 * 1) to regularly visit a hospital for treatment

title: 通院


text:
acacatl

Noun

 * 1) A kind of toad.

title: acacatl


text: effing and jeffing

title: effing and jeffing


text: effs and jeffs

title: effs and jeffs


text: effed and jeffed

title: effed and jeffed


text: 生け簀

title: 生け簀


text:
müfredat

Etymology
From, from , plural of.

Noun

 * 1) details
 * 2) curriculum, curricula
 * 1) curriculum, curricula

title: müfredat


text:
achakali

Noun

 * 1) shrimp.

title: achakali


text:
いけす

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  container, tank, or walled-of area within a body of water for cultivating fish

title: いけす


text:
kosoli

Noun

 * 1) acocil.

title: kosoli


text: い集

title: い集


text:
wildishly

Adverb

 * 1) In a wildish manner.

title: wildishly


text: Category:nhw:Amphibians

title: Category:nhw:Amphibians


text:
willier

Noun

 * 1) One who willies cleanses wool etc. with a willow

title: willier


text: willeyer

title: willeyer


text: williers

title: williers


text: willeyers

title: willeyers


text: णिक्किव

title: णिक्किव


text:
おもしろおかしい

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) humorous; amusing

title: おもしろおかしい


text:
arewa

Noun

 * 1) north

title: arewa


text: 面白可笑しい

title: 面白可笑しい


text: 面白おかしい

title: 面白おかしい


text:
துன்மதி

Noun

 * 1) folly
 * 2) ill-nature, wickedness
 * 3) wicked person
 * 4) the 55th year of the Jupiter cycle
 * 1) wicked person
 * 2) the 55th year of the Jupiter cycle
 * 1) the 55th year of the Jupiter cycle

title: துன்மதி


text:
つまみ

Noun

 * 1) pinching; pinch
 * 2) side to alcohol
 * 3) handle
 * 1) handle

title: つまみ


text:
gusum

Adverb

 * 1) south

title: gusum


text:
တိုက်လေယာဉ်

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) fighter plane.

title: တိုက်လေယာဉ်


text:
User:YousuhrNaym/HSKHigh2

New HSK lists

HSK Beginner (levels 1-3): all

HSK Intermediate (levels 4-6): level 4, level 5, level 6

HSK Advanced (levels 7-9): a-h, j-s (here), sh-zh

j

 * 1) (Mainland) or  (TW, HK)

l

 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )
 * 1) (as in )

m

 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (counter)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (counter)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (counter)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (counter)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 2) (counter)
 * 3) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)

p

 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)
 * 1) (verb)

q

 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)
 * 1) (noun)

title: User:YousuhrNaym/HSKHigh2


text:
𑀡𑀺𑀓𑁆𑀓𑀺𑀯

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) merciless, pitiless, cruel

title: 𑀡𑀺𑀓𑁆𑀓𑀺𑀯