text:
User talk:Tibidibi/archive

Nice edits.
Good Korean content. I like it.

But one thing: The formatting at 川理 isn't the usual way to format quotes. See WT:QUOTE or Category:English terms with quotations. —Suzukaze-c (talk) 03:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice! I'll take that into account.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 06:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

While you're here, could I humbly request that you check the Korean quotations at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:RQ:Junggan_Nogeoldae_Eonhae to see if I've done something horribly wrong? —Suzukaze-c (talk) 06:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I've added the missing romanizations and fixed a few things. But all in all the romanizations were not at all problematic.

 * I have a more definitional issue, though; 1795 is Early Modern Korean, and not Middle Korean (defined as up to 1600), and the forms seem to represent EMK and not MK:

 * In 사ᄅᆞᆷ, 엇지 esci "how" is a product of eighteenth-century palatalization; the MK form was 엇디 esti.
 * In Citations:ᄃᆞ라나다, there's the Early Modern collapse of vowel harmony: 사ᄅᆞᆷ의 salom-uy instead of the expected MK 사ᄅᆞᆷᄋᆡ salom-oy.
 * In Citations:거즛말 we have 니ᄅᆞ니오 niloniwo, but this is incorrect; the Middle Korean form was 니르니오 niluniwo. This orthographic error is typical of the eighteenth century, when the glyph <ㆍ> no longer represented a separate phoneme as it did in Middle Korean, making people confused about which words had <ㆍ> and which words didn't.
 * In Citations:쟈 we have 지어먹고 cie mekkwo instead of expected Middle Korean 지ᅀᅥ먹고 cize mekkwo, representing the sixteenth/seventeenth-century deletion of Middle Korean /z/.

 * I'm not quite sure what to do about this. It's true that 긿, 사ᄅᆞᆷ, 거즛말, etc., are all Middle Korean forms, but they're all also Early Modern Korean forms, especially because Early Modern Korean did not have a spelling reform and so a lot of words were written like their Middle Korean ancestors even when they were actually pronounced like they are today.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm, so I've created a dilemma (；・∀・)
 * (It's also nice to know the reason behind the fluctuation between 의 and ᄋᆡ.)
 * One solution that comes to mind is abolishing the Middle-Modern distinction (which was discussed before, IIRC, along with something similar for Old/Middle/Modern Japanese). Or maybe revising Wiktionary's definition of Modern Korean? (Unless it's too blasphemous.) —Suzukaze-c (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Yeah, it's a pretty thorny problem. I can't think of any good solution.
 * Korean-language dictionaries do actually abolish the Middle-Modern distinction and classify every Hangul form attested before the invention of Standard Korean in the early twentieth century as . This is probably the most intuitive way for native Korean speakers, but it seems quite unsatisfactory for non-Koreans and for general Wiktionary procedure.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Perhaps it could work well if we properly use lb and q, making clear what stage is represented. Language is a continuum anyway. —Suzukaze-c (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

 * True that. I've made some preliminary edits to this end in 사ᄅᆞᆷ and ᄇᆡ호다, as you can see. I guess "Korean" + "obsolete" is the best way to represent EMK within Wiktionary parameters.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 10:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Question about Yale romanization and hangul renderings
I noticed recently in that you'd updated the Yale romanization to include  to stand for some kind of fricative. This fricative is completely missing from the hangul spelling. I've never run across Yale romanizations that diverge so much from the hangul. What is your basis for romanizing in a way that adds letters / sounds missing from the hangul? Does the hangul itself need updating?

Curious, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Hi, I'll assume you can read Hangul with no problem.
 * Middle Korean orthography (with a very few exceptions, e.g. the treatment of ) is strictly surface forms-based. For example, we have 머그면 "if one eats" instead of the morphophonemic Contemporary Korean form 먹으면.
 * This brings us to certain issues. There are some MK terms like 몰애 "sand", 벌에 "bug", and so forth which are always written as such, and never as 모래, 버레, etc, which we would expect if the <ㅇ> were simply silent. Furthermore, every one of these problematic terms has a Gyeongsang variant with /k/: 몰기, 벌게이, etc. The issue is also visible in verbal conjugation. We have Middle Korean 먹거늘 "though one eats", but 살어늘 "though one lives". If we postulate a simple kenul~enul allomorphy, it's impossible to explain why the latter form isn't written 사러늘, as is the case for 머그면 "if one eats" (and not *먹으면, which is never attested in the MK period).
 * Accordingly, linguists believe that the consonant <ㅇ> had two values in Middle Korean. Word-initially, it was silent; when word-internally and followed by a previous syllable's coda consonant, it was /ɣ/, written  in Yale. Hence 어늘 in 살어늘 is actually /ɣənɨl/, which prevents the ㄹ from taking its intervocalic allomorph of [ɾ] and explains why Koreans so consistently wrote 살어늘 and not 사러늘. For the same reason, the correct Yale transcription of 벌에, 몰에, etc., is pelGey, mwolGey, and so forth.
 * Lee and Ramsey's A History of the Korean Language discusses this well in pp. 143—144.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Sorry for the double ping, I just made a few edits and hoped you didn't miss them. I would also add an example of a -based minimal pair in Middle Korean: vs. .--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the explanation, very clear and cogent. Much appreciated!
 * Presumably in syllable-initial position started out as, and lenited into silence?  Hangul as initially implemented appeared to be quite wonderfully regular and concise, and the inconsistency in phonetic realization of  in modern Korean has puzzled me.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 19:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Sorry for the late response. Actually, word-initial is unlikely to have ever been pronounced.
 *  is part of a small family of MK fricative phonemes which consistently have cognates with plosives in the Gyeongsang dialect. The other two such fricatives are  /β/, which is consistently /p/ [b] in Gyeongsang, and  /z/, which is consistently /s/ in Gyeongsang. The MK verbal paradigm (with allomorphs like kenul~Genul, mentioned above) also strongly implies that the three fricatives are inter-sonorant lenited versions of /k/, /p/, and /s/ respectively.
 * So if initial was at some previous point, we should expect some evidence, either cross-dialectally or within MK itself, that connects an initial open syllable to /k/. But no such evidence exists, and there is strong evidence that initial  has never existed in the known history of Korean. Namely, the Chinese characters that have Sino-Korean reflexes with initial  had *ʔ-, *j-, *w-, or *ŋ- initials in Middle Chinese, while the actual Middle Chinese *ɣ~ɦ initial (the 匣 initial) usually produces Sino-Korean reflexes with initial.
 * It's a bit puzzling why a linguist as otherwise so capable as Sejong failed to make separate letters for silence and, but I suppose even monkeys fall from trees sometimes.
 * As for modern Hangul where is also inconsistently, that's because Korean writers began to not distinguish visually between the characters  (which Sejong intended for silence or /ɣ/) and  (which Sejong intended for ) after around 1600. You might have known that already, though.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 12:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you again. I'm quite curious about the role of  as originally intended; it appears as a component in many of the other jamo, including  and, and obsolete combinations like .  I dimly recall reading somewhere that it may have served as a lenition marker, such that ,  →  .  I should get back to that at some point, not least as it's been so long that I'm sure the state of academic consensus has changed a bit.  Cheers!  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 19:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

 * ㅱ and ㆄ are unofficial letters. Only ᄫ was used to describe middle Korean W.
 * See 나무위키 https://namu.wiki/w/%ED%9B%88%EB%AF%BC%EC%A0%95%EC%9D%8C%EC%9D%98%20%EC%88%9C%EA%B2%BD%EC%9D%8C?from=%E1%85%8B#s-5.4 ᄫ also represented Japanese hiragana は in the past. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 15:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , see also w:Origin_of_Hangul, which lists all three, and describes these as initially used to transcribe Chinese, before they fell out of use. Since these apparently had no use case for spelling Korean terms, perhaps that's why they are described as "unofficial"?  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , the kana chart is very interesting, thank you for that! I'm puzzled by the distinction between は ㅸㅏ and わ ㅇㅘ.  I see too that へ is transcribed as ㆄㅖ with initial ㆄ instead of ㅸ, and う is transcribed as ㅱㅜ instead of the expected ㅇㅜ.  Even ね seems odd, transcribed as ㄴㅕ instead of the expected ㄴㅒ or ㄴㅖ.  So far as I'm aware, ㅕ has never existed as a vowel sound for a single kana.  (Apologies for the uncomposed jamo -- I don't have a Korean IME installed and Wiktionary's editor only offers discrete jamo input.) ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Wow, that's very interesting. I'm just telling you guys what linguists have written.

 * * https://ko.dict.naver.com/#/entry/koko/d4043bf8e7944078836df3188fa5b24f
 * * https://ko.dict.naver.com/#/entry/koko/7c3293a14401442e937aef7f382ef6e2

 * Hunminjeongum describes ㅸ as ㅇ 연서(ㅇ連書).

 * And another thing, Hangul is said to be created by King Sejong by himself, but I don't think so. I think Park Yeon made the Hunminjeongeum. There are plenty of circumstances to think so. But it's my personal opinion and I won't push it. What they believe is their freedom.

 * B2V22BHARAT (talk) 12:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Recent edits at 有叱 and intended pronunciation
In, regarding the reconstructed pronunciation, do you mean "*jiʂ-" → = , or do you mean "*jiʂ-" → *? I assume the latter, given that the fricative onset in, doesn't match well with the modern Korean. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 05:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

 * The latter is intended, yes.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 05:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The enigmatic poem of Nukata no Ōkimi
Greetings! I have seen your contributions to Old Korean and it looks promising.

Here's some background to this discussion: Alexander Vovin might have cracked the ninth poem of the  and the first lines seem to be in Old Korean. His book can be found at the References section of the Wikipedia article. Almost 700 years before, Sengaku somehow interpreted those first lines into the ancient Japanese, but only as a rough translation.

I had to edit that article under many IP addresses (was a tween back then) with some independent research, and had left it for a few years. When I came back, that Vovin reference has been put around 2017 or later by others. This is where your "expertise" might help. I was going to put this "phrase" here, but I didn't know where to start; either separately as parts, or the entire blob of Chinese characters.

When you're ready, feel free to reply to this discussion, this will get interesting. Thanks! ～ POKéTalker（═◉═） 04:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Vovin's translation is very promising, but I'm not sure anything from the verse itself is a fit for Wiktionary. The entire verse isn't a dictionary item, of course, and the orthography is quite atypical of the OK orthography used in all items so far added to Category:Old Korean lemmas. This isn't that surprising; Baekje and Silla are known to have had different orthographic traditions and modern knowledge of Old Korean orthography comes nearly entirely from the latter tradition, while Japan was probably much more influenced by the former.
 * A better fit for the information might be Wikipedia's entry on Princess Nukata, where the Poem 9 section is quite a mess.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Cool stuff, ! I'm curious, in the WP article at Princess_Nukata, where did the poem text come from?  There are some substantial differences in character choice from what I see in the UVA version at http://jti.lib.virginia.edu/japanese/manyoshu/Man1Yos.html#9.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 08:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

 * the characters are copied verbatim from Vovin's book, and the manuscript/character variants are explained on the Commentary section (pages 39-41, if there is a reading limit try clearing/refreshing your broswer). The aforementioned:
 * 莫器圓隣之大相七兄爪湯氣吾瀬子之射立爲兼五可新何本
 * ...versus the Genryaku kōhon (the one in the UoV corpus), which has the replaced with . Some have also replaced  →  and  →, in which he called them innovations. Anything else?
 * This discussion was supposed to be a suggestion to add either that very phrase (as a Wiktionary entry) or the parts of it (entries), like those undetermined lemmas. Didn't know about these "orthographic traditions" though, can you summarize? ～ POKéTalker（═◉═） 00:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Re: the spellings, I find that variation quite odd, as those aren't just alternative forms but rather wholly different characters. Some might be scribal variation, especially considering that this portion of the poem was probably opaque to most copyists.  For instance,  has a meaning of  and an on'yomi of ki and a Middle Chinese reading of, while  has a meaning of  and an on'yomi of kyō or gō and a Middle Chinese reading of probably something like.
 * Looking just at the last two characters of the mystery segment, I find Vovin's reconstruction inexplicable -- how does he get /mut/ from 湯? I'll have to see if I can access his text.
 * Re: orthography, I think Karaeng is referring to idu conventions. Presumably Baekje and Silla spoke different dialects, so it stands to reason that their usage of idu characters would also differ.
 * Given that the 12-character phrase here is 1) two stanzas of poetry, not a lexical item, 2) of uncertain language (Silla? Baekje? something else?), I'm not sure how we'd create an entry for it. Perhaps an Appendix namespace might work, but I don't think this is appropriate for a mainspace entry.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 01:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Silla Old Korean orthography fairly consistently applied two rules which scholars now call 訓主音從 and 末音添記.
 * The first means that content morphemes with clear Chinese equivalents (mostly nouns and verb stems) are written with their Chinese logogramic equivalents, while functional morphemes are written with phonograms. The second means that even when content morphemes are written with their Chinese equivalents, Old Korean scribes wrote the final syllable or consonant of the Old Korean word with a phonogram in order to allow readers to distinguish which of the multiple readings of a given Chinese character was being intended.
 * For example, here's two typical verses of Silla poetry, with phonograms superscripted:
 * 於內秋察早隱風未此矣彼矣浮良落尸葉如
 * enu AUTUMN-sol EARLY-n WIND-may THIS-uy THAT-uy FLOAT-a FALL-l LEAF-ti
 * The leaves that will float and fall here and there by a certain autumn's early wind
 * So effectively all meaningful words are written with logograms. By contrast, in Vovin's interpretation we have the following logogram-phonogram pattern:
 * 莫器圓隣之大相七兄爪湯氣
 * EVENING-ko-s tolali thi-ta-SEE-n-isy-a-ca-mut-ke
 * After [I] looked up at the evening moon, [I] did ask
 * The logogram-phonogram balance here is obviously very different from the conventional Silla orthography above. A more typically Silla way of writing the above sentence might have been:
 * 莫支叱月羅理之如相隱有良沙問氣
 * EVENING-ko-s MOON-la-li thi-ta-SEE-n-EXIST-a-ca ASK-ke
 * While Vovin's interpretation seems probably the most correct answer so far, the lines very likely not being Japanese, its orthographic differences suggest it came from a much more phonogram-heavy tradition of writing Korean. Perhaps not coincidentally, recent archaeological finds tentatively suggest that seventh-century Baekje scribes did use entirely phonogramic sequences, which were shunned by Silla writers.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 02:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

, But perhaps there really is a space for items like these in the Appendix, at least? I was mulling this over again, and the came to mind. Then there's of course 秀支替戾岡, 僕谷劬禿當, the only known sentence from the. And I'm sure there are similar cases from all over the world.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 07:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Another potential entry for this sort of "unknown verse" appendices could be the verse in the fourteenth-century Korean poem 履霜曲 Isanggok, which is clearly not written in Middle Korean and might be in some form of Mongol.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 09:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I like this idea, but I'm uncertain as to how best to implement. I've started a thread over at [[Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2020/September]].  Cheers!  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 19:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Thanks to this thread, I had a minor "aha" moment, captured over at [[:w:Talk:Nara_(city)]]. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 00:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Yin, yang and Middle Korean ᄂᆞᄆᆞᆶ and 나모
Curious if these are an ablaut / apophonic pair?

Also curious if the final that appears in Middle Korean from 나ᇚ might be reflected in the final  in ᄂᆞᄆᆞᆶ?

Any idea what that final element might derive from?

‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

 * These are not a yin-yang pair, because both ㅏ and ㆍ are yang vowels.
 * There could still be some form of ablaut relationship. ᄂᆞᄆᆞᆶ implies an Old Korean form that was something like *나ᄆᆞᄅᆞᆨ, since MK final is from OK ; see, e.g., the dialectal reflexes at  or the attested example of . This is quite similar to the standard OK reconstruction  for, enough that one could posit a root  with  and  being some kind of suffixes.
 * This is all quite speculative, of course.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 09:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

바다
So where is the actual historical record behind it? The Gyerim yusa states that Korean word for sea is 把剌(Bharat), so I presume the old Korean should be similar with this form. But you're saying that ancient Korean was pronounced as Badak, without showing actual historical evidence. How can you be so sure that the old Korean for sea was 바닥, not 바랗? You're just guessing, right? B2V22BHARAT (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * From Vovin's Koreo-Japonica, emphasis mine:
 * Middle Korean exhibits consonantal lenition of p > W, t > l [r], k > G, and s > z... Since the t/l alternation involves /l/, which also exists as a separate phoneme, it is virtually impossible to decide which intervocalic -l- in nouns may be a plain /l/, or the result of the t/l alternation, unless we have doublets, e.g., pàtáh ~ pàlól ‘sea’, where it is obvious that -l- in the second variant is a result of the t/l alternation.
 * And of course MK final -h implies OK final -k.
 * The reconstructed Old Korean here is exactly that, reconstructed on the basis of comparative evidence (in this case, the existence of both and  in Middle and Modern Korean and quite overwhelming evidence—based on Jilin leishi evidence, internal evidence from verb stem behavior, and just the general directionality of sound change—for the latter being the innovative form). There is no Old Korean source that gives the form *바닥.-Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 16:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * . I don't think the old Korean form of 바다(sea) is 바닥, because 바닥 means floor in Modern Korean, and the middle Korean form of 바닥(floor) is 바다ᇰ or 버터ᇰ. Just like English words See and Sea are unrelated, they are just pronounced similarly. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying that the word for "sea" came from the word for "floor". Perhaps the Old Korean word for "floor" was something entirely different. All I'm saying is that the only reconstruction compatible with the modern dialectal variation of is *바닥:
 * Korean dialects diverge on whether the consonant in the middle is ㄷ or ㄹ, and an intervocalic ㄷ > ㄹ sound shift is attested and obvious even in modern Korean, e.g. 걷다 > 걸어라, while the contrary sound shift is unknown
 * Korean dialects diverge on the coda consonant, but most of the alternatives (nothing, ㄱ, ㅇ, or ㅅ) are only one sound shift away from *ㄱ
 * Cheers,--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Oh I see. It seems that you have logic behind your argument. I'm sorry I doubted you. I tend to doubt things that are not on record. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 17:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

발음
Hi. On your edit(https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%EB%81%9D&oldid=60598141) on September 27, 2020, you omitted the standard pronunciation of a word by putting down only the regional pronunciation of a word. Dialects cannot take precedence over standard pronunciation. Nowadays, vowel length in distinguishing meaning of a word is disappearing especially among younger generations. Therefore, it is not that important to describe pitch tone, etc. See the article here and the book chapter here. The Standard Korean Language Dictionary has these marked in the dictionary, so you may refer to it but it's not that important and standard pronunciation of a word(IPA) should come first. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The 1.1 pronunciation section already gave the standard IPA for both Etymology 1 and Etymology 2, and the pitch accent applies only to the word 끝 and not the Hangul syllable itself. Hence the original organization of the entry. You're right that it's potentially confusing, so I've unified the pronunciation sections into a subsection of Etymology 2 in my most recent edit on 끝.
 * The idea that "it is not that important to describe pitch tone" isn't true, as you'd notice immediately once you cross the 문경새재. Vowel length is disappearing (in S. Gyeongsang it was already gone before Seoul), but the Gyeongsang pitch accent is independent of vowel length and is preserved completely intact even by speakers born in the 2010s. As my cousins in Busan could testify.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 13:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Yeap. It's much better now. I would appreciate it if you could correct any of the edits you made in the past containing only regional pronunciation written under etymology 2 or above, because it can confuse people. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 14:14, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

 * And for the Middle Korean entry, you are right. The examples should be listed under MK word template, not under the Modern Korean template, just like KevinUp have pointed out in the past. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 14:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * This was quite tedious but the pronunciation sections have all been relocated to reduce the confusion. Cheers,--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 14:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking. I also made a mistake in hanja entry in the past, so I went back and fixed it. So I know how it feels. Cheers. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 15:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

부아
Hello. I have recently been watching your edit and I would like to ask because there is a part where your editing doesn't fit the standard Korean dictionary. I am bringing with me the concepts listed in the dictionary of the National Institute of Korean Language with the scholars of the Naver Corporation. But you try to keep writing based on your thoughts and your own theories. I think this is wrong. Also, for ,I honestly have never used as a word for lung when I graduated from middle and high school in Korea, but the dictionary says that  is synonymous with pulmonary and therefore I only wrote it as it is. But you insist that it is not a commonly written example and insist on your own opinion, which is different from the one listed in the dictionary of the National Institute of Korean Language.
 * The NIKL dictionary of Korean (which is the same thing as the Naver dictionary in this case, since Naver ports from other dictionaries) has strong prescriptive tendencies in recording Korean (e.g. the or  or  fiascos), which in many cases means that it lists obsolete terms that no Korean would ever use while not listing or listing as proscribed terms that every Korean would know. This is why this dictionary has independent Criteria for inclusion, and things like Appendix:English dictionary-only terms.
 * I have not found a single result (out of the three required) that shows people using instead of  or . Not mentioning it in a dictionary or in a newspaper's etymology section, which fails WT:CFI, but actually using it for what it supposedly means. I've been searching for "부아가", "부아를", "부아는" and all results are about anger, a Thai restaurant, or things like this, which is strong evidence that NIKL is simply wrong to list this as a normal word in Modern Korean.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 16:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * https://ko.dict.naver.com/#/entry/koko/ca0b1fec63f44cb89cbd0d2f486800a2, B2V22BHARAT (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Again, dictionaries do not count as attestations, nor do compound words (see cranberry morpheme). Not to mention that itself is a very rare word. On a cursory search it seems to be used primarily in linguistic contexts, which strongly suggests to me that it's a nationalistically motivated neologism just like  and its ilk. But at least you can probably find three independent attestations for it, which is more than you can say for any non-obsolete "lung" meaning of .--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * According to (Korean-French dictionary) published in 1880,  is listed for meaning lung. However, modern word has changed its form to, and  as meaning for lung I couldn't find it. But its definition for meaning lung is still listed in Standard Korean dictionary.  B2V22BHARAT (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Again, dictionaries do not count for our purposes, the intuition of the general community of native speakers (here Koreans) does.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 16:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmmmm... Okay. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Rare word does not mean that it is archaic or obsolete. It appears that as a definition for lung is still alive. Take a look at these words., .  as a pure Korean word for lung is still alive and  widely used in a compound word with  to indicate.
 * To repeat myself, some people working in the field of Korean linguistics are prone to using strange native neologisms because of a pervasive ideology of . Some, like, are almost ungrammatical according to the language's own rules! This does not mean that the compounds they use are any more "alive" than cran in cranberry. Do you have any example of people using the word as a word in itself, and not in these ivory tower neologisms?--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 07:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Let's vote. 부아 as archaic term or dated term for lung. Can you help me how to do that? B2V22BHARAT (talk) 11:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2020/October
 * I think archaic is right, because 바른손(right hand) I never use it. Same with 부아. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 14:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

MK Romanization for Hanja
Hi,

I was wondering which MK (or modern?) Hanja reading you use for the MK Romanizations. I can't seem to notice a particular version to follow. I wanted to add quotations and expand some MK entries but couldn't figure this out :(

Also, how does the 방점 for at the end of verbs and adjectives work? From examples, they seem to be marked with a single dot. So I wonder If that's the way to mark for all others as well. Thanks! — LoutK (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I just use Hunmong jahoe forms (or what the HJ forms would reasonably have been, since the HJ doesn't have that many character readings), but if I can be frank I'm mostly going off memory WRT MK hanja readings so I've probably made mistakes haha.
 * The dictionary citation suffix -다〮 is uniformly high-pitch. Actually, most verbal suffixes are high-pitch and Middle Korean's pitch accent irregularity focuses more on the pitch of the verb stem itself.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 23:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Just noticed that you corrected a lot of my mistakes on MK Hanja readings subsequent to this, so thanks for this!--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Demonstratives
Curious if you've run across anything regarding possible cognacy between 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬 on the one hand, and 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬 on the other. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 20:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Whitman made a connection between and  and between  and, but it's not been very widely accepted, the latter especially.
 * Just a note on the latter the initial MK only merged into a fricative in the eighteenth century to produce 저, so the phonological similarities between Modern Korean and Japonic are deceptive. The more appealing comparison for the Korean form is, rather, 🇨🇬.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 21:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Failed to notice that 🇨🇬 traced from, and ya, that initial  would certainly seem to rule out any connection.
 * Re: the 🇨🇬, the closest Japonic term I can think of would be 🇨🇬, but then again this derives from ancient *ta ("who") + demonstrative nominalizing suffix -re. This *ta and descendants have meant  throughout the course of written Japanese, and it seems unlikely to have originated from a  demonstrative, unless we posit something much older.
 * Cheers! ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 01:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

About Korean etymology edits
안녕하세욥!! I edited like two entries, where I added etymologies from Naver 국어사전. I was wondering if 표준국어대사전, 우리말샘, 고려대한국어대사전, since Naver contains mainly these. I'll be adding etymologies. I've already added two for,. However, for the latter, I actually don't know how to go about giving a good etymology. It comes from middle korean 오래, which comes from 오라다 plus -이 (부사파생접미사), but the 오라다 is now 오래다 so like... ye its like a maze idk. Thank you for your answer in advance. -Solarkoid (talk) 10:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Hello, I've reformatted both and, hope this helps. Middle Korean etymologies that are no longer synchronically apparent should be explained as a Middle Korean derivation no longer transparent nowadays, as I have done in these two entries.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 11:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Korean abbreviations of book titles for Middle Korean sources in 표준국어대사전
Is there a list of these abbreviations and their expansion? —Suzukaze-c (talk) 19:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I don't have a list for the NIKL dictionary but these are the abbreviations used by the Korea University dictionary, which should be . The abbreviations on the NIKL dictionary come from a loosely defined standard across Korean-language academia because the full titles are a mouthful.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 20:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hm, I was wondering what 언두 was, but it's not on that list :P Hopefully it's good for other titles though! —Suzukaze-c (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Having checked with other NIKL-published sources, 언두 seems to be 언해두창집요 / 諺解痘瘡集要 (1608), which the KU dictionary abbreviates as 두창언. It's a book about treating smallpox that apparently includes a part about what foods smallpox patients should eat or avoid, so it seems right for .--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

 * @Suzukaze-c, Karaeng Matoaya: See 02 of 조사 문헌 on the left tab of 표준국어대사전's 일러두기. --39.122.78.101 09:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Oh! Nice. Now it seems so obvious that it would be there >< —Suzukaze-c (talk) 17:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorting 국한문혼용체
Hello,

I was wondering your thoughts on how to sort and lemmatize certain words or particles found almost exclusively in older 국한문혼용체 writings such as the. Particles such as 此, 其, 玆, 諸 and 又 or words such as 有하다, 無하다, and 吾等/吾人 are well found in these texts, but wouldn't make much sense to be written in Hangul-only texts in its bare Hanja reading and Hangul spellings of these words could only be found in Hangul-only transliterations of these style of older writings.

The NIKL lists (not all of these are listed) these in their Hangul spelling for obvious reasons (although with the 문어체/한문투 label). As such, some of those words have been listed in their Hangul spelling, but rather it should be Hangeul form of [hanja] as they are only found in Hangul transliterations.

So far, for the particles, I've been putting them under Hanja with a "literary" label, thanks to the flexibility of the Hanja section. But I think I might be better to list them under their proper function (pronoun, affix, etc.) with a better label (currently, the "literary" label seems to encompass contemporary literary Korean all the way to Korean Classical Chinese(!!)).

I thought of including these in the newly created 한문투 label, but I'm not sure if that conforms with the label's purpose. It might be more intuitive to create a separate 국한문혼용체 label and allow all entries on there to be lemmatized in its the Hanja form as the main entry with a Hangeul form of entry as well.

But I'm not sure If it's useful for the modern language policy to apply to late 19th century to early 20th century mixed-writing like the treatment of modern mixed-writing.

But again, There needs to be a standard for which words are "mixed-writing only" and which could also surface onto Hangul-only writing, so I might be very conservative as to what is a "mixed-writing only" word (mostly particles), but this would be subjective and arbitrary in nature. So I wanted to hear what you think about this. Thanks! — LoutK (talk) 21:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

 * , I think your idea of putting them under their proper POS in the Chinese character sections, with a new label for 국한문혼용체 and a Hangul form of template, will really work very well. Formal Korean writing before the early twentieth century is all on a spectrum from very Chinese to very Korean:

 * 學而時習之하면 不亦悅乎아
 * Chinese or Korean? Probably Chinese.
 * 其人이 宛爾而笑하고 唯唯而退하더라
 * Chinese or Korean?
 * 秋霜에 一雙秋鴈은 向南飛를 하더라
 * Chinese or Korean? After all, even if you take out all the Korean, it still works as a Chinese sentence.
 * 秋山이 秋風을 띠고 秋江에 잠겨 있다. 秋天에 秋月이 뚜렷이 돋았는데, 秋霜에 一雙秋鴈은 向南飛를 하더라.
 * This is the full context for the quote above; so does it change language mid-sentence? Frankly I'm not really sure any more.

 * So an arbitrary line does need to be drawn somewhere, I think being subjective and arbitrary to some extent is inevitable—so yes, I think you definitely should go ahead with your ideas! :) --Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 00:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

 * It's certainly difficult to draw the fine line between what's Korean or Chinese in those texts. So, I'll probably go after the single character terms (mostly pronouns) that fell out of use after said style became obsolete. Still Not sure how to handle the [漢字]-하다 ones, but they probably just deserve a Hangul entry instead (with the "literary" or 한문투 label). But including words any longer will probably over-complicate this, deciding if the Hanja form is truly Korean or if it's "mixed-writing only" would be confusing and unstandardized. For those, the "literary" label and Hanja form of [Hangul] should suffice for now. Thanks for the insightful reply! — LoutK (talk) 19:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Special:diff/61097060
Then, please use w:South Korean standard language instead of w:Seoul Dialect. 39.122.78.101 18:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure yet, but add Korean dialects in Module:accent qualifier/data as below, then ko-IPA will working as you say.

labels["Busan"] = { link = "Gyeongsang dialect", display = "Busan" }

39.122.78.101 05:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

공책에다가 받아쓰세요
Hi,

Could you please help me understand the grammar of the sentence, specifically the 다가 part? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 08:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, in this context 에다가 is an emphatic synonym of the locative particle 에 when referring to spaces/locations/directions, etc., which can only occur with transitive verbs:
 * 침대 옆에다가 컵을 놓았어: I placed the cup besides the bed. (transitive verb, grammatical)
 * *건물에다가 사람이 적더라 (adjective, ungrammatical)
 * *침대 옆에다가 컵이 놓였어 (intransitive verb, ungrammatical)
 * There is also a non-locative use of 에다가 with the meaning of "in addition to" which can occur with intransitives (e.g. 밥에다가 빵까지 먹었어, 파리에다가 모기까지 생겼어) but you might know about it already.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 11:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! No, I wasn't aware of other usages either, so I couldn't figure out that is a standalone word. I have made a stub for it, please add a definition, if it's OK. I have used your usage example in the entry :) --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

MK Hanja glosses
Hi,

便 had me thinking how to place MK readings. I've been placing each MK reading with their direct phonological descendant reading, even if the MK gloss doesn't match the Modern Korean meaning. This makes sense when no glosses were provided.

But as I started adding these glosses, I'm starting to think the glosses should take precedence over the readings in determining which etymology to place it in. This way, it better represents the differences that might have existed in the MK stage.

As for 便, I think your theory is correct. My Hanja dictionary states that "편" is from both 平聲 and 去聲 and "변" is only from 去聲. So, the divide isn't from MC, nor one of them is a 俗音. So it's most likely that "편" and "변" were once used for both senses, and eventually solidified into each reading to differentiate the senses, especially to avoid the 'excrement' sense like you said.

Thanks for creating the links for the eumhuns. Hanja-ety is still at its experimental stage (well, besides my terrible code). So, I didn't think of adding those. Ideally, the individual source templates (using these takes up too much space just introducing the reading) would be ditched in favour of embedding all of them in the single template and giving more emphasis on the glosses (including the Romanization for those as well). I think the template can increase accessibility to many Middle Korean entries, especially those without a direct Modern Korean descendant. — LoutK (talk) 07:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

변변찮다/변변치않다
Hi,

Is a form of ? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

 * I think I got it now, after Googling. 변변치 is apparently a contraction of 변변하지. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Vovin
Alright, I managed to send him an email. It would be quite an honour if he responds and it were to mark the beginning of an enduring correspondence
 * , I've also emailed him WRT the etymology for "mole". It would be truly wonderful if he were to become a contributor here, haha.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 04:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Quick question: Can you verify the 둗거비 attestation in the 四聲通解: '蝦 今俗語 癩蝦蟆 옴둗거비'?
 * , I don't have the time right now to check exhaustively myself but the attestation is being claimed by several secondary sources (another example) so I'm inclined to believe it more than not. OTOH one dictionary may have made a mistake and everyone else might have followed their lead, which is a thing that happens.
 * Apparently, there is another pre-hangeul attestation of the word for "toad" as 豆何非 in the thirteenth-century Hyangyak gugeupbang; this word is used to gloss Chinese in that text. This form would appear to imply  assuming that Sino-Korean readings for these characters did not change in the meantime.
 * This is probably the earliest clear attestation of the word, and while it doesn't match perfectly with either post-Hangul form ( or ), I don't think it's compatible with Vovin's proposed etymology.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 16:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Interestingly enough, Pulleyblank 1991 reconstructs Early Mandarin *xɔ < LMC *xɦa for 何, so I'll have a look whether the vocalism is corroborated by any other example in the 鄕藥救急方. I'm also curious whether the initial is ever used to transcribe k, since a handful of Sino-Korean readings do have it (e.g. 酣, 匣).
 * , elsewhere the Gugeupbang transcribes with 加, so IMHO it seems more likely in this case that the transcription really does intend  or something similar.-Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 00:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Well, if my counting is to be trusted, the character 何 appears exactly once, in this word. So unless it can somehow be found in the 高麗史, this hypothesis remains purely speculative, especially as the 鄕藥救急方 uses native character readings, unlike the Jilin Leishi. If the vowel is indeed a, based on LMC, then I can only wonder what implications this might have for Korean reconstruction.
 * . Yes, 何 only appears in this word. But the vocalism is corroborated not just by LMC but by Middle Sino-Korean itself, where the reading of this character is given as 하 in Sinjeung yuhap, Gwangju cheonjamun, and Seokbong cheonjamun (as is to be expected from finals). I think it's possible that 허 was intended, as an ablaut pair and because the few existing Sino-Korean characters for this syllable are rather semantically loaded  such that they may be inconvenient or confusing to use them as phonograms. Certainly, such a vocalism would work better with the Middle Korean reflexes. Still, it would be methodologically best to try and work with the orthography given IMO.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

I was not assuming that Early Mandarin became the mainstream reading tradition, so my proposal only involved short term linguistic diffusion, but your hypothesis might be marginally better since it does not require external factors. Still, I am not convinced that semantics would be a significant enough obstacle, and there are other suitable characters, regardless: 吁, 喣, 呴, 噓 ‘to sigh, exhale', 魖 'a kind of bad spirit' etc. Apparently 남풍현 1981: 借字表記法 treats it as a spelling error based on LMK data, but doesn't offer any solution. The 'h' is still elusive, but two ideas crossed my mind:

1. It is an irregular remnant of the TH cluster: *twuhAp < *twuTHep < *twutVhep < *twutVkep, immediately after syncope (or, in other words, before the aspiration process was completed). A better candidate from a purely phonetic point of view would be our proposed pre-lenition syncopated form *twutkep, but I am curious whether swuh ~ swuph ~ swup ~ swuphwul 'forest' (all attested in the 15th century) could serve as evidence for the aspiration scenario.

2. It is a dissimilative reduction of the identical syllables in **twutwukep, followed by lenition.

Anyway, I hope you've had a wonderful holiday season and may 2021 bring you happiness and good health.

Old Japanese Shiraki and Korean Silla(h)
Given our past discussions about an apparent Old Korean locative suffix -k → Middle Korean -h, I'd appreciate any improvements you could make at 新羅, particularly etym #2. Cheers, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Automatic vote counting
FYI, your vote in Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2021-02/User:PUC for admin is not showing up in the automated total in Votes/Active because Module:votes looks for a signature on the same line as a support or oppose template. This is probably just a cosmetic problem because a human will review the votes. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 11:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Etymology of 'Korea', Mandarin.
Hi I wonder if there're more articles supporting that the word 'Korea' is from 'Mandarin', not from any other Sinitic languages. I found a description, 'from Chinese Gao li', given by etymonline, but since there's no reference list on the website, I don't think this can fully show it's from 'Mandarin', although 'Gao li' is certainly a Mandarin pronunciation. I want to ask you if you can help me find other clues. I'm really curious about this. Sorry for bothering you. --Echewen (talk) 13:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , the relevant Early Modern European sources are here, courtesy of Sogang University. The first work is the Itinerario of, which in the same section gives "Chausien" for , which is almost certainly Mandarin.--Tibidibi (talk) 13:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply with full details. It really helped me. I just wonder if we can't assume 'Core' or Medieval Latin 'Caule' is not from Mandarin, and Linschoten wanted to 'correct' the actual name of the 'island' called 'Core' is 'Chausien', which he directly heard from a Mandarin speaker. Just an assumption. --Echewen (talk) 13:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , "Caule" must be from Mandarin because he learned the word from the Mongols (given the fact that he also reports the native Mongol word for Korea), and the Mongols did not at that point control any area of China that does not speak Mandarin. For "Core", it's more disputable. Van Linschoten says he learned the word from the Portuguese, so it could be Mandarin but (though probably less likely given the clearly Mandarin form of "Chausien") also other varieties of Chinese spoken in southern China which the Portuguese happened to hear. I've hedged the etymology at Korea a bit, adding the sentence at "less likely from a non-Mandarin variety of Chinese with similar pronunciation". A non-Chinese etymology seems unlikely to me.--Tibidibi (talk) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

I find the latest revision you modified is more comprehensible. I agree that the word is 'perhaps specifically' from Mandarin although I still think it could be from other Sinitic languages (less likely, though). I learnt a lot here. Thanks a lot. Stay safe and have a nice day --Echewen (talk) 01:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

I summarised the etymology of Korea but I made a typo in the edit summary so I again write a message here: I'm not sure if I summarised it too much so I want to ask what you think of it. --Echewen (talk) 07:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the summary, which I've largely maintained. I've restored a few things, mainly with the idea that it's important that readers understand that the specific word "Corea" (with "r" and not "l" in the middle) actually appeared in the sixteenth century during the Joseon/the Age of Discovery, not during the actual Goryeo period.--Tibidibi (talk) 08:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

좋다
됴ᄒᆞ다 is probably the older form, cf. >, > . This is a compound of the unknown element , potentially a Chinese character that underwent semantic nativisation given that this syllable does not occur in initial position in any native Middle Korean word, and the adjective-deriving light verb , modern.

Are there any solid grounds for this claim!? Alexander Vovin believes this word is related to the Goguryeo language.
 * I have responded on your talk page.--Tibidibi (talk) 07:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply.
Leaving Eastern Buyeo, Jumong was known for his exceptional skill at archery. His original Goguryeo name, variously transcribed as "Jumong", "Jungmo", or "Domo", translated to "good archer". The first component can be reconstructed as "tywoh-(:둏; 'be good')".

Then, apart from the claim of the Chinese character etymology of the Korean vocabulary'tsot (jot)', do you agree with Professor Vovin's opinion!?

FVS characters
Hi. I noticed that you created this Manchu entry which contains FVS character. Thanks for your contribution but I am afraid the letter you used for this word is wrong. I created a new one that has no FVS character. They may look the same in this case, but using FVS characters actually results in a wrong letter shape. For example, the characters di that you used in are displayed as  when isolated, while the corrected form should be. The one with FVS has a notch above the first letter d, but in Manchu orthography this shape is only used in and. For vowels a, o and i, the correct forms are  and. Next time when you created Manchu entries, could you make sure if there is any FVS characters in the words? Thank you! Bula Hailan (talk) 09:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , thank you for the notice, and thank you also for your contributions to Manchu entries. I'll be more careful from now on.--Tibidibi (talk) 01:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

KO 아침 and JA 朝
Thinking about the JA term itself, there appears to be a potential connection with, with an everyday sense of , close to the surface, but also a sense of not much time has passed: still early or recent.

Are there any Koreanic terms of similar sound shape to that have any similar senses of shallow? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , the earliest traceable KO word for "morning" was probably, a dialectal word which is attested only from the seventeenth century but appears to be the precursor of 🇨🇬 ; I have added relevant phonological information to the entry at . But itself looks like a suffixed form, so the original root may have been . This has been connected to 🇨🇬, and also looks like a very good fit for the Japanese because Old Japanese lacked affricates.--Tibidibi (talk) 04:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hmm, hmm, interesting. I cannot think of any instances where an affricated  is borrowed into Japanese as an, however.  I'll do some digging as time allows, see if I can find any analogous cases.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , there is for example >, where the Middle Chinese transcription and the 🇨🇬 makes it clear that  in the Japanese  approximates the affricate .--Tibidibi (talk) 01:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Good find. I note that this 支 is regularly found as  in Japanese sources, with the exception of its use to denote  in, perhaps hearkening back to its Old Chinese initial consonant, or reflecting a dialectal variant (I note that modern Min Nan reads this as ki).
 * The following vowel for 支 is consistent as in almost all modern Chinese reflexes and in all the borrowed CJKV terms.  What would account for OKM  or  corresponding with JA, and what of the final  in the Korean?
 * Are there any Korean terms that demonstrate metathesis over time? Specifically, any chance that the  initial in àcík or acyek might have evolved from earlier, where the  would be the root?
 * , there is a fairly convincing recent argument that OKM, which is the single most common diphthong in the language, actually comes from an ancient monophthong . If so, Early Modern Korean would anciently have been , which somewhat resolves the issue of the second vowel. There is also modern dialectal , , which suggest an OKM variant form.
 * For the final, it's probably a suffix. There's a not terribly common Middle Korean diminutive suffix which is probably unrelated. It's also worth noting that , modern 🇨🇬 looks like  + unknown suffixes  (< ) or , which could be a variant of the same suffix we observe in.
 * Metathesis is not common in Korean, and IMHO is particularly unlikely to be a result of metathesis because it behaves as a discrete phoneme, not as a consonant cluster.--Tibidibi (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Reconstruction:Proto-Korean/hoL and OJP 日 (pu)?
This might be a long stretch, but the potential may be there.

Modern Japanese remains in a few fossilized terms as Old Japanese pu, notably in  from older kepu, literally ke "this" + pu "day".

There's also Japanese, which appears in fossilized terms and a few ancient texts with the readings po and pu. I've long wondered if there might be overlap with Korean. And there is a small handful of terms that evidence ↔  correspondences, such as  and, both of which were formerly mayo.

→ This leads me to wonder if there might have been any po reading for Japonic "day", which would bring this term within throwing distance of the Koreanic etymon.

→ That said, the Japonic initial doesn't match very well with the Koreanic initial. I note too that the hard sound reconstructed for Chinese is often reflected in Japanese as.

Curious as to your thoughts. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 18:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but I'm a bit skeptical because the Japonic shift occurred after the main period of contact between the two languages, and Koreanic has had no such shift (Korean  in this position is more likely to come from ). In addition, it is also important to note that Yale romanization  here really represents eighth-century Old Korean  based on Sino-Korean reflexes of Middle Chinese.--Tibidibi (talk) 15:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

 * I figured this was probably a stretch too far, but I'm less familiar with Koreanic phonetic shifts and was curious enough to reach out, at least to find reasons to shut down further (unproductive) speculation. :)  Cheers!  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 18:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Are you following Ito (2007) to reconstruct *ə for MK o? Because I'd rather go with Whitman (2015) based on Miyake (2018 etc.) to reconstruct *e > LMK ye, and keep *ə > LMK e and *ʌ > LMK o.
 * I was indeed following Ito and some other analyses of Middle Sino-Korean, but recently I've become more convinced otherwise. In either case, my main point here for Eirikr was that Yale orthography is deceptive and o would not have sounded like Japanese .--Tibidibi (talk) 11:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tibidibi/archive


text:
crewmanship

Noun

 * 1) The status or role of crewman.
 * 2) The skills and abilities of a crewman.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: crewmanship


text:
namnika

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to love, like, see as good

title: namnika


text:
sugestia

Etymology
,, from.

Noun

 * 1) suggestion
 * 2) suggestion
 * 3)  suggestion
 * 1)  suggestion

title: sugestia


text: Category:Terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *ḱel- (cover)


text:
superproteção

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) overprotection

title: superproteção


text:
interland

Etymology
Shortening of. Equivalent to nl.

Noun

 * 1)  A sports match between national teams.

title: interland


text: interlands

title: interlands


text:
chanchia

Etymology
From + /chi/ +. .

Verb

 * 1) to think, suppose, believe

title: chanchia


text: Category:Terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *ḱley- (incline)


text: Category:Terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *ḱley- (cover)


text:
hai·a

Verb

 * 1) to know, understand

title: hai·a


text: Category:Proto-Celtic terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *ḱley- (cover)


text:
LPF-achtig

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  Resembling the  (“Lijst Pim Fortuyn”), esp. featuring chaotic and bitter infighting.

Usage notes
Chiefly used in relation to novel, secular political parties of the further right.

title: LPF-achtig


text: Category:Proto-Germanic terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *ḱley- (cover)


text:
ham·a

Verb

 * 1) want, desire, ask for

Usage notes

 * (usually with noun object)

title: ham·a


text:
inebriació

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) inebriation

title: inebriació


text:
LPF-toestanden

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1)  Chaotic circumstances that involve bitter infighting.

Usage notes
Chiefly used in relation to novel, secular political parties of the further right.

title: LPF-toestanden


text:
βραβεύω

Etymology
From. See.

Verb

 * 1) to award, bestow
 * 2) to commend

title: βραβεύω


text:
mantenerse firme

Verb

 * 1) to stand one's ground, to hold firm, to stand firm, to remain steadfast, to hold fast

title: mantenerse firme


text:
-sok-

Affix

 * 1) arrive, reach

title: -sok-


text: Wiktionary:Word of the day/2020/December 3


text:
asbestify

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) To convert into asbestos or into a mixture containing asbestos.

title: asbestify


text: asbestifies

title: asbestifies


text: asbestifying

title: asbestifying


text: asbestified

title: asbestified


text:
asbestification

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The process of asbestifying.

title: asbestification


text:
rubryka

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) box, space, blank
 * 2) column

title: rubryka


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2023/September 18


text:
比並

Verb

 * 1)  to compare; to contrast
 * 2)  to unrealistically compare oneself with a much stronger counterpart; to compete (with each other socially); to try to keep up with the Joneses

Synonyms

title: 比並


text:
Talk:not long

not (so) long
It was on TV not (so) long ago --Backinstadiums (talk) 18:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:not long


text:
Zwaben

Etymology
Probably borrowed from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Swabia region in southwest Germany

title: Zwaben


text:
Talk:學習54號文件

. —Suzukaze-c (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * — justin(r)leung { (t...) 18:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:學習54號文件


text: porika

title: porika


text: 寿星公

title: 寿星公


text: 婚龄

title: 婚龄


text: 悬峙

title: 悬峙


text: 旷夫

title: 旷夫


text: 楞蛏

title: 楞蛏


text: 比并

title: 比并


text: 水龟子

title: 水龟子


text: 牛高马大

title: 牛高马大


text: 狮鸟

title: 狮鸟


text: 窜港

title: 窜港


text: 经济体

title: 经济体


text: 经纬

title: 经纬


text: 经纬线

title: 经纬线


text: 艺专

title: 艺专


text: 药盒

title: 药盒


text: 衰样

title: 衰样


text: 覆診

title: 覆診


text: 跛脚鸭

title: 跛脚鸭


text: 轮候

title: 轮候


text: 轮筹

title: 轮筹


text: 双料

title: 双料


text: 龙虱

title: 龙虱


text: 龍虱

title: 龍虱


text: 龟子

title: 龟子


text:
royement

Noun

 * 1) the cancellation of membership, expulsion

title: royement


text: royementen

title: royementen


text:
komia

Etymology
. Analyzable as /komi/ +.

Verb

 * 1) to lessen, reduce, come down (as a price)

title: komia


text:
asbestise

Etymology
From.

title: asbestise


text: asbestises

title: asbestises


text: asbestised

title: asbestised


text: asbestising

title: asbestising


text:
manderang

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * , people

title: manderang


text:
podrażnić

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to irritate, to inflame

Conjugation
or

title: podrażnić


text:
emborratxar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to make drunk, to intoxicate
 * 2)  to get drunk
 * 3)  to cause colours to bleed, especially while washing clothes

title: emborratxar


text: negatieven

title: negatieven


text:
gramnegatief

Etymology
Compound of. Named after.

Adjective

 * 1) gram-negative

title: gramnegatief


text:
grampositief

Etymology
Compound of. Named after.

Adjective

 * 1) gram-positive

title: grampositief


text:
gramkleuring

Etymology
Compound of. Named after.

Adjective

 * 1)  Gram staining

title: gramkleuring


text:
podrażniać

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to irritate, to inflame

title: podrażniać


text:
ёкваё

Noun

 * 1) any member of the  family. A diver or loon.

title: ёкваё


text: -rang

title: -rang


text:
chasong

Noun

 * 1) generation, era

Noun

 * 1) generation, era, lifetime

title: chasong


text:
indiba

Conjunction

 * 1) but, however

title: indiba


text:
μαλάγρα

Noun

 * 1)  chum

title: μαλάγρα


text: μαλάγρας

title: μαλάγρας


text: μαλάγρες

title: μαλάγρες


text:
niroka

Verb

 * 1) observe, guard, look after, watch over

title: niroka


text:
trådlös

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) wireless

title: trådlös


text: centre punch

title: centre punch


text:
ӄипуӄ

Etymology
Possibly cognate to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae)

title: ӄипуӄ


text:
kakket

Adverb

 * 1) true, correct

title: kakket


text:
ramram

Adverb

 * 1) ordinary, normal, usual

title: ramram


text: trådlöst

title: trådlöst


text:
訾那

Adverb

 * 1)  how

title: 訾那


text: trådlösa

title: trådlösa


text:
мычыквын

Noun

 * 1) shirt

title: мычыквын


text: Template:mk-decl-noun-n-и

title: Template:mk-decl-noun-n-и


text:
鏖糟

Adjective

 * 1)  dirty

title: 鏖糟


text:
jakkala

Etymology
From + kal +.

Verb
(combining form jakkal)

 * 1) to use

title: jakkala


text:
meddwi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to get drunk, to become intoxicated
 * 2)  to make drunk, to intoxicate
 * 1)  to make drunk, to intoxicate

title: meddwi


text:
röse

Etymology
From the. Related to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) cairn (manmade pile of stones)

title: röse


text:
jakkaltoa

Etymology
From jakkal + +.

Verb

 * 1) to be good to use

title: jakkaltoa


text:
Template:mk-decl-noun-n-и/documentation

This template provides the inflection of Macedonian neuter nouns that end in and form the plural with, such as "животно"

Parameters

 * The stem, which is the singular form without the final.
 * The stem, which is the singular form without the final.

 * The number of the noun. Leave this empty for normal countable nouns. For singular-only nouns, use, and for plural-only nouns, use.
 * The number of the noun. Leave this empty for normal countable nouns. For singular-only nouns, use, and for plural-only nouns, use.

title: Template:mk-decl-noun-n-и/documentation


text: けがわ

title: けがわ


text:
Talk:鏖糟

=Citation= 温州话方言词典（李荣), page 180

title: Talk:鏖糟


text: もうひ

title: もうひ


text: kegawa

title: kegawa


text: mōhi

title: mōhi


text: rösen

title: rösen


text:
ӄонагтэ

Noun

 * 1) pants, trousers

title: ӄонагтэ


text:
毛革

Etymology
Alternative spelling for, replacing the character with.

title: 毛革


text:
żuława

Noun

 * 1) ait, eyot, haugh

title: żuława


text: rösena

title: rösena


text:
asbestiferous

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Containing asbestos.

title: asbestiferous


text:
Talk:顯

=Citation for Wenzhou definition= 温州话方言词典（李荣), page 40

title: Talk:顯


text:
obscurantistic

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to obscurantism.

title: obscurantistic


text: Category:User frp

title: Category:User frp


text: Category:User frp-1

title: Category:User frp-1


text: Category:User mwl-1

title: Category:User mwl-1


text:
User:Queer Ibero-America

Queer Ibero-America on English Wikipedia

Queer Ibero-America on Spanish Wikipedia

Queer Ibero-America on Catalan Wikipedia

Queer Ibero-America on Asturian Wikipedia

title: User:Queer Ibero-America


text:
ittafamaꞌ

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) meeting
 * 2) reunion
 * 3) appointment
 * 4) date

Related terms

 * ittafama

title: ittafamaꞌ


text:
tabookoli

Noun

 * 1) lunch
 * 2) lunchtime
 * 3) midday
 * 4) noon
 * 5) noontime

Verb

 * 1) to be noon (place)

Related terms

 * tabookoli impa

title: tabookoli


text:
hofe

Noun

 * 1) ground-ivy

title: hofe


text:
すー

Noun

 * 1) father, dad

title: すー


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2021/January 10


text:
ishnaako̠

Etymology
From.

Pronoun

 * 1)  ; you, thee
 * 2) and you? (response to a greeting)

Related terms

 * (emphatic, subject)

title: ishnaako̠


text: Category:English terms derived from Erie


text: Category:Terms derived from Erie

title: Category:Terms derived from Erie


text: ていしゅく

title: ていしゅく


text:
xugaman

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) towel

title: xugaman


text:
re-edge

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) To renew, repair or restore the edge (of something).

title: re-edge


text:
っゆー

Etymology
Related to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  fish

title: っゆー


text:
посмражати

Noun

 * 1) make stinky, pollute, defile
 * 2) * from the Homily against the Bogumils, 1594-1596:
 * "cu"

- не бѫдѣте ꙗко ѵпокрꙑти посмражаѭтъ бо лица своꙗ да сѧ ꙗвѧтъ чловѣкомъ постѧще сѧ

title: посмражати


text: re-edged

title: re-edged


text:
魚っぱし

Etymology
From +, from earlier.

Verb

 * 1) fishing

title: 魚っぱし


text:
User:Mladifilozof

I am learning Old Church Slavonic, and while learn I contribute.

title: User:Mladifilozof


text:
weftless

Adjective

 * 1)  Without a weft.

title: weftless


text:
бөтөү

Etymology
From.

Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to end, finish, be over
 * 2)  to graduate from college, university
 * 1)  to graduate from college, university

title: бөтөү


text: ن ف ي

title: ن ف ي


text:
vecchia volpe

Etymology
lit. 'old fox'.

Noun

 * 1)  well-established, astute person; sly dog, old hand

title: vecchia volpe


text:
pull aside

Verb

 * 1)  to separate  from a crowd for a private conversation

Translations

 * Italian: prendere da parte

title: pull aside


text:
laschesse

Etymology
From lasche + -esse.

Noun

 * 1) laxity; negligence

Descendants

 * English: (law)

title: laschesse


text:
estoupail

Etymology
(1360) From estouper + -ail.

Noun

 * 1) stopper (for a bottle, etc.)

Descendants

 * English: (law)

title: estoupail


text:
lemon thyme

Noun

 * 1) A species of thyme with gold-variegated leaves and a lemon-like scent,  or  (there's disagreement as to whether this is a hybrid).
 * 2) Cultivars of other species with a similar appearance and scent, especially the creeping species.

title: lemon thyme


text: lemon thymes

title: lemon thymes


text:
повѣдѣти

Etymology
..

Verb

 * 1) announce, inform
 * 2) * from the Homily against the Bogumils, 1620-1621:
 * "cu"

- нъ повѣдѣ же и дроугаꙗ словеса ихъ имиже оулавлꙗѭтъ доушѧ грѫбꙑихъ чловѣкъ.

 * 1) deliver a sermon

title: повѣдѣти


text:
了滯

Adjective

 * 1)  clean

title: 了滯


text: 座敷童子

title: 座敷童子


text: 了滞

title: 了滞


text: ばしゅ

title: ばしゅ


text:
prendere alla lontana

Etymology
lit. 'to take distantly'.

Verb

 * 1)  to say circuitously or long-windedly

Usage notes

 * Typically used with the clitic.

title: prendere alla lontana


text:
space buns

Etymology
An allusion to the wearing of this hairstyle by Princess Leia in the space opera film .

Noun

 * 1)  A hairstyle consisting of twin buns worn on top of the head.

title: space buns


text: röses

title: röses


text:
ishnaako

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

title: ishnaako


text: rösets

title: rösets


text:
подобати

Verb

 * 1) to befit, be appropriate
 * 2) * from the Homily against the Bogumils, 1622:
 * "cu"

- не подобаѥтъ троуждати сѧ дѣлаѭще земьнаꙗ

 * 1) have to
 * 2) * John 3:7, from Codex Marianus, 4030700:
 * "cu"

- не диви сѧ ѣко рѣхъ ти · подобаатъ вамъ родити сѧ съ вꙑше ·

 * 1) to imitate, follow

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to befit, to beseem, to suit
 * 2)  to look like, to resemble

title: подобати


text: rösens

title: rösens


text:
English thyme

Noun

 * 1) A common species of thyme grown for its use in cooking,, especially a cultivated type with rounder, flatter and smoother leaves.

title: English thyme


text: Sörens

title: Sörens


text: English thymes

title: English thymes


text:
ʔuʔəd

Verb

 * 1) agree strongly; say yes
 * tux̌ʷ čəxʷ ɬugʷəʔuʔəd čəda ɬukʷaʔəd tiʔəʔ adsƛ̕alalic̓aʔ
 * Only when you agree will I release your clothing

title: ʔuʔəd


text:
xewqan

Adjective

 * 1) desirous

title: xewqan


text:
falangeride

Noun

 * 1) phalangerid

title: falangeride


text: falangeridi

title: falangeridi


text:
Talk:no place

nowhere
NOWHERE (also informal no place especially in North American English) --Backinstadiums (talk) 21:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:no place


text:
ishnoꞌ

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Pronoun

 * 1)  you, thee

title: ishnoꞌ


text:
ʔuhuʔəd

Etymology
distributive reduplication of

Verb

 * 1) agree by lending vocal support as someone is talking to you

title: ʔuhuʔəd


text:
hachishnoꞌ

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Pronoun

 * 1)   you all, y'all, you

Usage notes

 * Independent pronouns can be used in any non-subject position, they can also be used in place of a nominal object.

title: hachishnoꞌ


text:
ʔuʔlab

Verb

 * 1) to recall the distant past

title: ʔuʔlab


text:
French thyme

Noun

 * 1) A variety of English thyme with leaves that curl under along the sides and that have woolly hairs on the undersides, and which is often considered one of the best thymes for cooking.

title: French thyme


text: French thymes

title: French thymes


text:
праздьнъ

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) empty, vacant
 * 2) void, unoccupied
 * 3) vain, idle
 * 4) * from the Homily against the Bogumils, 1627-1628:
 * "cu"

- и тѣмьже и дроуѕии о нихъ праздьни ходѧтъ не хотѧще ничимьже сѧ приѩти рѫкама своима

 * 1) * from the Homily against the Bogumils, 1638:
 * "cu"

- праздьнꙑи не дѣлаѩ да не ꙗстъ

title: праздьнъ


text:
sʔubədiʔ

Noun

 * 1) hunter

title: sʔubədiʔ


text:
terbesar

Adjective

 * : biggest

title: terbesar


text:
alla lontana

Etymology
lit. 'at the long'.

Prepositional phrase

 * 1)  without direct or immediate connection

title: alla lontana


text:
Talk:unGoogleable

Swap 'alternative'?
Shouldn't this be the alternative spelling (and ungoogleable the primary)?

Like for googleable/Googleable.

--Mortense (talk) 21:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

 * I agree. I will attempt to update it. Somerandomuser (talk) 23:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It's now updated. Somerandomuser (talk) 23:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:unGoogleable


text: приѧти

title: приѧти


text:
caraway thyme

Noun

 * 1) A creeping species of thyme native to the Mediterranean islands of Sardinia, Corsica and Majorca, which is grown for its caraway-scented leaves

title: caraway thyme


text: caraway thymes

title: caraway thymes


text:
ʔudaw̓

Noun

 * 1) tallow
 * dəgʷaš tiʔəʔ ʔudaw̓s, tiʔəʔ dukʷdukʷs, təbɬs
 * She put her tallow, her red clay, her ochre in (her pack)

title: ʔudaw̓


text: asbestosing

title: asbestosing


text: asbestosed

title: asbestosed


text:
ʔudəgʷ-

Prefix

 * 1) (morpheme always bound to a lexical suffix) middle

title: ʔudəgʷ-


text:
ʔudəgʷabac

Preposition

 * 1) in the middle of a room or field; the middle of some unit of measurement

title: ʔudəgʷabac


text:
creeping thyme

Noun

 * 1) A species of thyme native to Europe and northern Africa,, grown as a fragrant groundcover due to its tendency to branch and grow horizontally.
 * 2) Wild thyme,, which has a similar habit.

Usage notes
There is a great deal of confusion in references between and, with the former often misidentified as the latter.

title: creeping thyme


text: creeping thymes

title: creeping thymes


text:
foroferi

Etymology
See.

Verb

 * 1) to offer up, relinquish

Synonyms

 * oferi, oferdoni
 * forlasi, abandoni, forcedi, rezigni

title: foroferi


text:
сънѣдати

Etymology
From, related to.

Verb

 * 1) eat, eat up, consume
 * 2) * from the Homily against the Bogumils, 1629-1630:
 * "cu"

- нъ прѣходѧще отъ домоу въ домъ тоуждаꙗ сънѣдаѩ имѣниꙗ

title: сънѣдати


text:
i·rurata

Etymology
From +  +.

Verb

 * 1) go back and forth
 * 2) commute

title: i·rurata


text:
ʔudəgʷič

Preposition

 * 1) in the middle of a house, room, pile of things or road

title: ʔudəgʷič


text: foroferas

title: foroferas


text: foroferis

title: foroferis


text: foroferos

title: foroferos


text: foroferus

title: foroferus


text: foroferu

title: foroferu


text: foroferanta

title: foroferanta


text: foroferantan

title: foroferantan


text: foroferantaj

title: foroferantaj


text: foroferantajn

title: foroferantajn


text: foroferata

title: foroferata


text: foroferatan

title: foroferatan


text: foroferataj

title: foroferataj


text: foroferatajn

title: foroferatajn


text: foroferinta

title: foroferinta


text: foroferintan

title: foroferintan


text: foroferintaj

title: foroferintaj


text: foroferintajn

title: foroferintajn


text: foroferita

title: foroferita


text: foroferitan

title: foroferitan


text: foroferitaj

title: foroferitaj


text: foroferitajn

title: foroferitajn


text: foroferonta

title: foroferonta


text: foroferontan

title: foroferontan


text: foroferontaj

title: foroferontaj


text: foroferontajn

title: foroferontajn


text: foroferota

title: foroferota


text: foroferotan

title: foroferotan


text: foroferotaj

title: foroferotaj


text: foroferotajn

title: foroferotajn


text: foroferanto

title: foroferanto


text: foroferanton

title: foroferanton


text: foroferantoj

title: foroferantoj


text: foroferantojn

title: foroferantojn


text: foroferato

title: foroferato


text: foroferaton

title: foroferaton


text: foroferatoj

title: foroferatoj


text: foroferatojn

title: foroferatojn


text: foroferinto

title: foroferinto


text: foroferinton

title: foroferinton


text: foroferintoj

title: foroferintoj


text: foroferintojn

title: foroferintojn


text: foroferito

title: foroferito


text: foroferiton

title: foroferiton


text: foroferitoj

title: foroferitoj


text: foroferitojn

title: foroferitojn


text: foroferonto

title: foroferonto


text: foroferonton

title: foroferonton


text:
helibiking

Noun

 * 1) The sport of mountain biking from a dropoff point reached by helicopter

title: helibiking


text: foroferontoj

title: foroferontoj


text: foroferontojn

title: foroferontojn


text: foroferoto

title: foroferoto


text:
pil·a

Verb

 * 1) return, go back, come back
 * 2) transform, shape-shift (to transform and return back)

title: pil·a


text: foroferoton

title: foroferoton


text:
hen run

Noun

 * 1) A chicken run

title: hen run


text: foroferotoj

title: foroferotoj


text: foroferotojn

title: foroferotojn


text:
herdsperson

Noun

 * 1) A herder; a herdswoman or herdman

title: herdsperson


text: foroferante

title: foroferante


text: foroferate

title: foroferate


text: foroferinte

title: foroferinte


text: Herts.

title: Herts.


text: foroferite

title: foroferite


text: foroferonte

title: foroferonte


text:
high-flying

Alternative forms

 * highflying

Adjective

 * 1) Characteristic of a highflier; extravagant in conduct or opinion.

Translations

 * Finnish:
 * Polish: ,

title: high-flying


text: high wire

title: high wire


text:
-pil·-

Affix

 * 1) return, reverse, again

title: -pil·-


text:
aramang

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) any of a number of species of small marine shrimp of the genus

title: aramang


text: foroferote

title: foroferote


text:
hitperson

Noun

 * 1) A hired killer; a hitwoman or hitman

title: hitperson


text: hit-up

title: hit-up


text: Rhymes:Esperanto/eri

title: Rhymes:Esperanto/eri


text:
ضرسة

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) molar tooth

title: ضرسة


text: high wires

title: high wires


text: high-wires

title: high-wires


text: herdspersons

title: herdspersons


text: herdspeople

title: herdspeople


text:
chokka-chaffaꞌ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) family

title: chokka-chaffaꞌ


text: Category:mt:Teeth

title: Category:mt:Teeth


text:
fare scena

Etymology
lit. 'to do scene'.

Verb

 * 1)  to perform; to act

title: fare scena


text:
i·a

Etymology
From +.

Verb
(combining form i·)

 * 1) go, come

title: i·a


text: Frankl

title: Frankl


text:
arban

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) herd; flock

title: arban


text:
bemummelt

Adjective

 * 1) overdressed

title: bemummelt


text:
-ang-

Affix

 * , in that direction

title: -ang-


text:
asbestosize

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) To introduce the use of asbestos to.

title: asbestosize


text:
asbestosization

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The act of asbestizing; asbestization.
 * 2) The introduction of the use of asbestos for insulation, fireproofing, etc.
 * 1) The introduction of the use of asbestos for insulation, fireproofing, etc.
 * 1) The introduction of the use of asbestos for insulation, fireproofing, etc.
 * 1) The introduction of the use of asbestos for insulation, fireproofing, etc.

title: asbestosization


text: asbestosizes

title: asbestosizes


text: asbestosizing

title: asbestosizing


text: asbestosized

title: asbestosized


text:
beriemt

Adjective

 * 1) famous, renowned

title: beriemt


text:
sangit

Etymology
From *saŋit, from, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) cry; weeping

Verb

 * 1) to hook, to entangle

title: sangit


text:
-에다가

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Particle

 * 1)  right by, right at;
 * 2) on top of, in addition to;
 * 1) on top of, in addition to;
 * 1) on top of, in addition to;

Usage notes

 * In the locative sense, the particle is only used with transitive verbs. In the enumerating sense, it is also used with intransitives.

title: -에다가


text:
kvintessenssi

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  quintessence hypothetical form of dark energy postulated to explain observations of an accelerating universe

title: kvintessenssi


text:
beroomt

Adjective

 * 1) sooty

title: beroomt


text:
besäten

Adjective

 * 1) possessed (by a demon or spirit), demoniac
 * 2) obsessed

title: besäten


text:
ewliemes

Etymology
From. The long vowel is explainable as early contraction with the accusative ending -a, thus ʾawwala ʾams → ʾawwalām(i)s. A variant ʾāmis of is apparently attested in isolated dialects, but it could also be due to backformation from the aforementioned contraction.

Adverb

 * 1)  the day before yesterday; two days ago

title: ewliemes


text:
gronga

Etymology
From grong +.

Verb

 * 1) meet

title: gronga


text:
beschädicht

Adjective

 * 1) damaged

title: beschädicht


text:
Sportplatz

Noun

 * 1) sports field

title: Sportplatz


text:
busua

Etymology
From busu +.

Verb

 * 1) cough

title: busua


text:
verpfuschen

Verb

 * 1)  to botch, mess up

title: verpfuschen


text:
beschieet

Adjective

 * 1) threadbare, worn-out

title: beschieet


text:
perdersi d'animo

Etymology
lit. 'to lose [of] one's soul'.

Verb

 * 1) to lose heart

title: perdersi d'animo


text: Bewohnerin

title: Bewohnerin


text:
onaccounta

Preposition

 * He's depraved onaccounta he's deprived.
 * He's depraved onaccounta he's deprived.

title: onaccounta


text:
atchinga

Etymology
From atching +. Likely a form of onomatopoeia.

Verb

 * 1) sneeze

title: atchinga


text:
biesta

Adjective

 * 1) delirious

title: biesta


text:
Badeente

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) rubber duck

title: Badeente


text:
Korean mint

Noun

 * 1) An anise-scented Asian perennial herb,.

title: Korean mint


text:
ipok

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) grandchild

title: ipok


text: Template:R:Vanoverbergh 1956

title: Template:R:Vanoverbergh 1956


text:
sipokni

Verb

 * 1) to be old

title: sipokni


text:
User talk:DogExpert

Dixtosa (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

მარა
Hey welcome! Don't just remove stuff without a reason. Also, Mingrelian a separate language and if a term also exists in Mingrelian you are free to make a separate entry for it. Just keep in mind that formatting is important. See example here: კვერცხი. Dixtosa (talk) 23:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:DogExpert


text:
inkáttohmi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to have how many?

Usage notes

 * Especially used in the context of partners, romantic or sexual interests or previous relationships.

Related terms

 * (indefinite)

title: inkáttohmi


text:
hockey ball

Noun

 * 1) A small hard ball used in the sport of hockey (field hockey)

title: hockey ball


text: hokey cokey

title: hokey cokey


text:
Template:cic-verb-subjects-1-consonant-plural-subject

Class I Verb Subjects (Active)


text:
káttohmi

Verb

 * 1) to be how many?
 * 2) to be how many of sth?

Related terms

 * inkáttohmi
 * kattohmi

title: káttohmi


text: Category:Ilocano non-lemma forms

title: Category:Ilocano non-lemma forms


text:
home advantage

Noun

 * 1)  The advantage a sports team has from using their usual sports field

title: home advantage


text: Category:Ilocano verb forms

title: Category:Ilocano verb forms


text:
вдячність

Etymology
. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) gratitude, gratefulness, thankfulness

title: вдячність


text:
home ice

Noun

 * 1)  The rink where a team usually plays

title: home ice


text:
home improvement

Noun

 * 1) The act of making changes to one's home in order to make it prettier, larger, more efficient, or generally better

title: home improvement


text: Category:Maltese terms belonging to the root ż-r-q


text:
home range

Noun

 * 1) the area in which an animal lives and moves periodically

title: home range


text:
tornihuhu

Etymology
From. The Finnish Defence Forces often use a stylised tower as a symbol.

Noun

 * 1) a rumor or story circulating around the

title: tornihuhu


text:
ariek

Noun

 * 1) disgust

title: ariek


text: 바이든

title: 바이든


text:
home stand

Noun

 * 1)  A series of consecutive games played at one's home ground

title: home stand


text:
home language

Noun

 * 1) The main language spoken in a home.

Translations

 * Afrikaans: huistaal
 * Esperanto: hejmlingvo

title: home language


text:
akankawaalhaaliꞌ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fried chicken

title: akankawaalhaaliꞌ


text:
housewoman

Noun

 * 1) A female servant or slave who works in the house

title: housewoman


text:
zukkini

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) zucchini, courgette

title: zukkini


text:
arimadeng

Noun

 * 1) aversion

title: arimadeng


text:
household goods

Noun

 * 1) Collectively, products destined for use in the house, for example, for cleaning, cooking, eating, home entertainment, personal hygiene, sleeping, and general upkeep.

Translations

 * Kurdish:
 * Northern Kurdish:, qapûqazan,
 * Polish: artykuły użytku domowego

title: household goods


text:
żummara

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  fife, pipe

title: żummara


text:
User:Steve Mac Brasil

SATIRÍASE = (Lang. Pt Brasil) or ( Lang. Eng UK) = TERM or WORD,specifically used to define the 'SEXUAL condition/action/expression of Nymphomania' related to THE MALE GENDER, when exhibiting the behavioral conditions-traits, of Nymphomania - the term usually designated exclusively to THE FEMALE GENDER. - - Fonte: Livro ~ Sexo, Problemas e Soluções ~ Emidio Brasileiro 1996 ISBN 85-86027-01-4 page 257 Q&A # 720: "Satiríase ou satirismo é uma manifestação de erotismo NOS HOMENS, caraterizada por excessivo desejo sexual, que leva a ereções quase continuas, com ejaculações reptidas e ardor genésico excessivo, e acompanhados freqëntemente de alucinações e delírio. Como explicar a satiríase? " - - Eng: (approximate translation) 720: Satiriase or satirism, is an erotic manifestation in men, characterized by excessive sexual desire, which results is almost continuous erections, with repeated ejaculations and an excessive genetic ardor, frequently accompanied by hallucinations and delirium. How do we explain satirism ?

title: User:Steve Mac Brasil


text:
żammar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to play the fife, pipe

title: żammar


text: Category:Maltese terms belonging to the root ż-m-r


text: Category:mt:Musical instruments

title: Category:mt:Musical instruments


text: edb

title: edb


text:
brysthaldar

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a bra

title: brysthaldar


text:
arimokamok

Noun

 * 1) drizzle

title: arimokamok


text:
aring-ing

Noun

 * 1) neigh

title: aring-ing


text: Category:ilo:Animal sounds

title: Category:ilo:Animal sounds


text: Category:ilo:Sounds

title: Category:ilo:Sounds


text: Category:ilo:Sound

title: Category:ilo:Sound


text: Category:ilo:Horses

title: Category:ilo:Horses


text:
Template:cic-verb-subjects-1-vowel-ch-sh

Class I Verb Subjects (Active)


text: Category:ilo:Equids

title: Category:ilo:Equids


text: Category:ilo:Odd-toed ungulates

title: Category:ilo:Odd-toed ungulates


text:
blauss

Adjective

 * 1) pale, pallid, sallow, wan

title: blauss


text:
bleiwlich

Adjective

 * 1) bluish

title: bleiwlich


text:
ariwekwek

Noun

 * 1) multitude; abundance

title: ariwekwek


text:
ayokpánchi

Alternative forms

 * ayoppánchi

Etymology
N-grade derived from.

Verb

 * 1)  to like

title: ayokpánchi


text:
Grunnlova

Proper noun

 * 1) the Constitution of Norway

title: Grunnlova


text:
跺足

Verb

 * 1)  to lift up one's foot and to stamp the earth forcefully

title: 跺足


text:
pjanu

Noun

 * 1)  piano

title: pjanu


text:
𧿒腳

Verb

 * 1)  to lift up one's foot and to stamp the earth forcefully

title: 𧿒腳


text: Category:Chickasaw N-grade verbs

title: Category:Chickasaw N-grade verbs


text: Grl.

title: Grl.


text:
ariring

Noun

 * 1) similarity

title: ariring


text: 𧿒脚

title: 𧿒脚


text:
blenkjrich

Adjective

 * 1) shiny

title: blenkjrich


text: Category:Chickasaw ch-to-sh verbs

title: Category:Chickasaw ch-to-sh verbs


text:
aririt

Noun

 * 1) very fine object

title: aririt


text:
bloodrich

Adjective

 * 1) bloody, gory

title: bloodrich


text:
濟喙

Verb

 * 1)  to talk out of turn; to shoot one's mouth off

title: 濟喙


text: 济喙

title: 济喙


text:
vjolin

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  violin

title: vjolin


text:
blootoam

Adjective

 * 1) anemic

title: blootoam


text:
blottich

Adjective

 * 1) muddy, mucky

title: blottich


text:
boaft

Adjective

 * 1) barefoot

title: boaft


text:
ariwatang

Noun

 * 1) multitude; abundance; lot

title: ariwatang


text:
boajich

Adjective

 * 1) hilly, mountainous

title: boajich


text: 𐍈𐌰𐌽𐍉𐌷

title: 𐍈𐌰𐌽𐍉𐌷


text:
若久

Adverb

 * 1)  how long (in terms of time)

title: 若久


text:
arnged

Noun

 * 1) proportion
 * 2) equality
 * 3) convenience
 * 1) convenience

title: arnged


text:
夾峙

Verb

 * 1) to tower on both sides

title: 夾峙


text: 夹峙

title: 夹峙


text: jiāzhì

title: jiāzhì


text: jiázhì

title: jiázhì


text:
arked

Noun

 * 1) equality

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) arcade

title: arked


text:
Appendix:Middle Korean verbs

This appendix is on the inflectional paradigms of mid-fifteenth-century Middle Korean verbs and adjectives, henceforth referred to as "verbs" for convenience's sake (note that Korean adjectives behave as a subset of verbs).

All romanizations are in the.

Pitch assignment principles
Middle Korean verbal pitch is determined by three intertwining factors: the pitch of the verb stem, the pitch of the suffixes, and a simple tone sandhi rule.

Stem pitch
For the purposes of verbal pitch, the verb stem has up to three allomorphs, depending on the accentual class. Korean verb stems cannot appear without at least one suffix, and the allomorph taken depends on which of the following three categories the immediately subsequent suffix falls into:

 * 1) Consonant-initial suffixes.
 * The example used in this page is.
 * 1) Non-minimal vowel -initial suffixes.
 * The example used in this page is -아〮/어〮.
 * 1) Minimal vowel -initial suffixes. (Note that -(ᄋᆞ/으)시〮 behaves atypically as will be described below.)
 * The example used in this page is -(ᄋᆞ〮/으〮)면〮.

The initial minimal vowel of the final category of suffixes is dropped after a verb stem ending in a vowel or the sonorous consonant, except for -(ᄋᆞ/으)시〮, which drops the initial vowel after a vowel but not after.

The monosyllabic verb classes are given two names: an acronymic name given by Korean scholar Yoo Pil-jae, and a numbered name given by American scholar S. Robert Ramsey. The multisyllabic classes are given Yoo's names only, because Ramsey did not discuss them.

With a few exceptions, verbs which are a compound of multiple stems inherit the pitch accent pattern of their components.

Suffix pitch
Most Middle Korean suffixes have a fixed underlying pitch. For most of them, this is an underlying high pitch on all syllables.

The following suffixes involve a syllable with a fixed low pitch. There may be some others, but they are rare.

 * -(ᄋᆞ〮/으〮)ᅌᅵ is the most common suffix with underlying low pitch.
 * has an initial low-pitch syllable. Strangely, compound suffixes involving this suffix, such as, have the expected underlying high pitch on all syllables.
 * has an initial low-pitch syllable according to Yoo Pil-jae 2011.

The following three suffixes lack a fixed pitch, but take the same underlying pitch as that of the syllable that precedes it. In Korean, these are called.

 * , but not when followed by the subject-honorific (ᄋᆞ/으)시〮 or the desiderative (ᄋᆞ/으)지〮, in which case it assumes underlying high pitch.
 * In addition, had either an allomorph or synonymous suffix,, which was more common with transitive verbs. Strangely enough, the latter did have fixed underlying high pitch.
 * 1) the minimal vowel in (ᄋᆞ/으)시〮. The non-minimal syllable sí has high pitch.
 * Note that the minimal vowel has underlying high pitch in all other suffixes.

Finally, the object-honorific suffix had an unusual allomorphy:

 * Before consonants, it took the rising pitch, which is not really a distinct pitch but a low-high sequence within a single bimoraic syllable.
 * Before vowels, it took the low pitch but heightened the underlying pitch of the subsequent vowel. Therefore, even the minimal vowel of (ᄋᆞ/으)시〮 was heightened after.

This is identical to the pitch behavior of Class R! verb stems. In fact, this is because was the grammaticalized, suffixized form of the Class R! verb stem ; see  for more.

Tone sandhi
The interaction between stems and suffixes determine the underlying pitch of a conjugated verb. The surface pitch, which is what is written in actual Middle Korean sources (with a few very rare exceptions by scrupulous scribes attempting to write the underlying form) and transcribed in Wiktionary, is shaped by a simple but pervasive tone sandhi rule: high pitch cannot appear consecutively for more than two syllables, and the penultimate syllable in any such sequence is lowered to avoid this.

Note that the "rising pitch" is not really a distinct pitch but a low-high sequence within a single bimoraic syllable, so this sandhi rule still applies to it.

For example, the form 수〮므〮시ᄂᆞ〮니라〮 has underlying high pitch on all six syllables. However, the third and fifth syllable surface as low-pitch to avoid a triple sequence of high-pitch syllables.

While there are exceptions to this rule, they are largely irrelevant for the purposes of the verbal paradigm.

Class L/Class 1
The verb stem is a low-pitch monosyllable.

Class L!/Class 7
The verb stem is normally a low-pitch monosyllable. Before minimal-vowel-initial suffixes, it takes a bisyllabic allomorph involving a final low-pitch minimal vowel. Another analysis—producing the same results, although at odds with the explanation of MK pitch given above—could be that the stem is still a low-pitch monosyllable, but that it forcibly lowers the underlying pitch of any subsequent minimal vowel. See the example below.

Class H/Class 2
The verb stem is always high-pitch.

Class H!/Classes 3 and 4
The verb stem changes irregularly according to the suffix that follows it; this cannot be predicted phonologically. In compounds, the verb stem takes high pitch, which is why scholars now tend to suggest that the underlying pitch is high.

The pitch determination is loosely morphologically conditioned, and is as follows:

Ramsey divided Classes 3 and 4 based primarily on modern dialectal data, but there is little support for it in the Middle Korean corpus, as he himself admitted.

Class R/Class 5
The verb stem is always rising-pitch.

Class R!/Class 6
The verb stem is rising-pitch before a consonant-initial suffix, and low-pitch before any vowel-initial suffix.

As the rising pitch is not really a distinct pitch but a low-high sequence, what is really happening here is that the sequence is compressed into a single syllable when before a consonant, but bleeds out into the next syllable if there is any subsequent vowel. Therefore, the subsequent vowel is always underlying high-pitch, only surfacing as low-pitch when sandhi intervenes.

This is particularly important for the pitch of the minimal vowel of (ᄋᆞ/으)시. If we mistakenly believed that the syllable simply transforms from rising- to low-pitch, the minimal vowel would also have to be low-pitch due to being dependent on the preceding syllable. However, the vowel in question always takes high pitch absent sandhi.

Class LL~L/Class 8
All of these verbs have irregular stems that are normally vowel-final bisyllabic, but take a monosyllabic consonant-final allomorph for non-miminal vowel-initial suffixes. All syllables of the stem are always low-pitch.

Class LH~R
These verbs have irregular stems that are normally vowel-final bisyllabic, but take a monosyllabic consonant-final allomorph for non-miminal vowel-initial suffixes. The bisyllabic form has an initial low pitch and a final high pitch. The monosyllabic form has rising pitch. These verbs are very rare and Ramsey did not have a separate category for them.

Class LH
This is the largest class of bisyllabic verb stems, with a low pitch on the first syllable and a high pitch on the second.

Class LL
This is a medium-sized class of bisyllabic verb stems with low pitch on both syllables.

Class HH
This is a small class of bisyllabic verb stems with underlying high pitch on both syllables.

Class RH
This is another small class of bisyllabic verb stems.

Class LHL
This is the largest of the trisyllabic classes, which are quite rare in Middle Korean.

Class LHH
Because of tone sandhi, which obscures the underlying pitch in many inflections of these verbs, Yi 1964 appears to have erroneously classified these with the above underlying LHL class.

Other pitch patterns
A very few multisyllabic verb stems have LR, LLL, LLH, RLH, RHL, or HHL pitch patterns. As these are very rare, they have not been given their own sections.

Tendencies in pitch assignment
See also Appendix:Koreanic reconstructions.

 * Class L/Class 1
 * All verb stems in this class end with a non-lenited obstruent, including.
 * Conversely, the significant majority of verb stems that end with a non-lenited obstruent belong to this class.
 * Lenited consonants never occur with this class.
 * Class L!/Class 7
 * Almost all verbs that end in belong to this class.
 * Class H/Class 2
 * All verb stems with the form or, where  is a minimal vowel, belong to this class.
 * Class H!/Class 3, 4
 * This class consists solely of verb stems of the form.
 * Conversely, all such verb stems, with the exception of given above, belong to this class.
 * Class R!/Class 6
 * The majority of verb stems that end in a lenited consonant belong to this class.
 * Around half of verb stems that end in a nasal or in belong to this class.
 * Class LH
 * Virtually all causative verbs belong to this class.

Other irregularities
The alternation between stem-final and  before consonants, and  and  before vowels, are not discussed here because they can be explained by positing underlying ㅸ and ㅿ which surface as ㅂ and ㅅ in voiceless environments. They are therefore not irregular per se.

Verbs ending in minimal vowels
Verb stems ending in the minimal vowels and  have their minimal vowels elided by any non-minimal vowel-initial suffix.

Verbs ending in /-l/
Verb stems ending in have a few features:

 * The minimal vowel does not surface after except for (ᄋᆞ/으)시〮.
 * elides before most suffixes beginning with, , and , and also some beginning with ; the same applies for suffixes which would otherwise have a preceding minimal vowel
 * Final also causes most suffixes beginning with  to lenite to.

Compare below:

The verb irregularly elides final  before some (but not all) -initial suffixes as well. Compare:

Verbs ending in /-j/ (falling diphthongs)
Verb stems ending in falling diphthongs (,, , etc.) have the following features:

 * They cause diphthongization of a following vowel, effectively resulting in gemination of.
 * Three verbs,, , and are sometimes attested with a monophthongized stem before a vowel-initial suffix:  rather than , and so forth. But the rule is that the stem diphthong is also preserved.
 * They also cause most suffixes beginning with to lenite to.

/T/ irregularity
Some verb stems end in before consonants and  (realized as ) before vowels. These behave like the lenited consonants and ; indeed, an archiphoneme  could be posited for them.

/k/, /G/, /l/ irregularity
Some verb stems have shape before consonants and minimal vowel-initial suffixes, but have a  allomorph before non-minimal vowel-initial suffixes. The final consonant that appears here may be, , or. The vast majority of these stems belong to Class LL/8.

Related to this, some bisyllabic verb stems whose second syllable is have an allomorph with  before non-minimal vowel-initial suffixes. These stems belong to Class LH.

Some verb-specific irregularities
The stem of, a Class H! verb, takes before non-minimal vowel-initial suffixes.

The stem of is realized as  before most consonant-initial suffixes, and as  before all vowel-initial ones.

title: Appendix:Middle Korean verbs


text:
embrutir

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to dirty, to soil
 * 2) to stupefy, to coarsen
 * 1) to stupefy, to coarsen

title: embrutir


text:
爛賭鬼

Noun

 * 1)  gambler; inveterate gambler

title: 爛賭鬼


text: 烂赌鬼

title: 烂赌鬼


text:
arusadanan

Noun

 * 1) patio; yard

title: arusadanan


text:
賭腳

Noun

 * 1)  gambler; inveterate gambler

title: 賭腳


text: 赌脚

title: 赌脚


text:
跋錢人

Noun

 * 1)  gambler; inveterate gambler

title: 跋錢人


text: 跋钱人

title: 跋钱人


text:
embrutiment

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dirtying, fouling
 * 2) defilement, degradation
 * 1) defilement, degradation

title: embrutiment


text: Category:Maltese terms belonging to the root d-w-d


text:
乾豆乾

Noun

 * 1)  ; dried tofu

title: 乾豆乾


text: 干豆干

title: 干豆干


text:
豆脯仔

Noun

 * 1)  ; dried tofu

title: 豆脯仔


text: yīxíhuà

title: yīxíhuà


text:
dewwed

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to be full in worms or lice

title: dewwed


text: Category:ilo:Fagales order plants

title: Category:ilo:Fagales order plants


text: Category:ilo:Shrubs

title: Category:ilo:Shrubs


text: めかくし

title: めかくし


text:
paska champoliꞌ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cookie
 * 2) cake

title: paska champoliꞌ


text: mekakushi

title: mekakushi


text: bùwú

title: bùwú


text:
油炸豆腐

Noun

 * 1)  deep-fried tofu

title: 油炸豆腐


text: bùwúxiǎobǔ

title: bùwúxiǎobǔ


text:
-ako̠

Alternative forms

 * -aako̠

Suffix

 * 1) Contrastive object ending used with nouns/pronouns.

title: -ako̠


text:
性魅力

Noun

 * 1) sex appeal; sexiness

title: 性魅力


text: xìngmèilì

title: xìngmèilì


text:
動跤動手

Idiom

 * 1)  to come to blows

title: 動跤動手


text:
vízparti

Adjective

 * 1) waterside of, pertaining to or situated on a waterside

title: vízparti


text: 动跤动手

title: 动跤动手


text:
-aako̠

Alternative forms

 * -ako̠

Suffix

 * 1) Contrastive object ending used with vowel-loss nouns and pronouns.

title: -aako̠


text:
User:Tibidibi

User:Saranamd will be used for Persian or related edits, and this account for Korean-related ones. I may sometimes forget to switch accounts.

title: User:Tibidibi


text: Category:Chickasaw noun suffixes

title: Category:Chickasaw noun suffixes


text: Category:Chickasaw pronoun suffixes

title: Category:Chickasaw pronoun suffixes


text: Category:en:Menthinae subtribe plants

title: Category:en:Menthinae subtribe plants


text: Category:Menthinae subtribe plants

title: Category:Menthinae subtribe plants


text:
licorice mint

Noun

 * 1) The anise hyssop,.
 * 2) Any of several other species of  that have an anise flavor and fragrance.

title: licorice mint


text:
蘿蔔仔

Noun

 * 1)  chilblain
 * 2)  dried preserved radish
 * 3)  radish; daikon

Synonyms

title: 蘿蔔仔


text: Category:en:Nepetinae subtribe plants

title: Category:en:Nepetinae subtribe plants


text: Category:Nepetinae subtribe plants

title: Category:Nepetinae subtribe plants


text:
kabos

Adjective

 * 1) poor

title: kabos


text: 萝卜仔

title: 萝卜仔


text: Category:ilo:Calendar

title: Category:ilo:Calendar


text: Old Bolingbroke

title: Old Bolingbroke


text:
撐嘴

Verb

 * 1)  to answer back ; to talk back

title: 撐嘴


text: 撑嘴

title: 撑嘴


text: すえおく

title: すえおく


text: sueoku

title: sueoku


text:
ߘ

Letter

 * 1) The Fourteenth character of the N'Ko script

title: ߘ


text:
頂指

Noun

 * 1)  thimble a protective cap for the finger

title: 頂指


text: 顶指

title: 顶指


text:
釣梹仔

Noun

 * 1)  fishing rod; fishing pole

title: 釣梹仔


text: 钓梹仔

title: 钓梹仔


text:
釣魚篙

Noun

 * 1)  fishing rod; fishing pole

title: 釣魚篙


text: 钓鱼篙

title: 钓鱼篙


text:
бꙑлиѥ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  plants, herbs
 * 2) * from the Homily against the Bogumils, 1794-1796:
 * "cu"

- бо би велѣлъ богъ не дѣлати чловѣкомъ то бꙑлиѥ жито би раждало и лѣсъ грозниѥ.

 * 1)  medicine

title: бꙑлиѥ


text:
釣鉤仔

Noun

 * 1)  hook for fishing; fishhook

title: 釣鉤仔


text: былие

title: былие


text:
boarmherzich

Adjective

 * 1) generous

title: boarmherzich


text: 钓钩仔

title: 钓钩仔


text:
booshauft

Adjective

 * 1) ill-natured

title: booshauft