text:
User talk:Stombs

Hi Stombs, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:

 * Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
 * The help centre and FAQs
 * The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~. Some people do not pay attention to unsigned comments. An important note: Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

But above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

TPK 06:22, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Style
Hi 'Stombs, could I give you a friendly suggestion, that you read the Manual of Style before making any more contributions. It may mean that many changes won't need to be made to your entries to knock them into Wiki shape.. Cheers. Moriori 08:54, Aug 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * Greetings again Stombs. Tks for your response on my talk page. Another friendly suggestion (yes, ANOTHER one), when you post to talk pages your contribution goes on the bottom of the page, not the top, (or at the bottom of the subject you are replying to, as I have done here). Anyway, good to see you are now registered user. Look forward to some entries about the area you live in.Go BOP. Ka kite. Moriori 22:05, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Thank you again, Moriori—just got the message from Bishonen as well about stuff going at the bottom. At work today so better not do quite as much during the weekdays! Noho ora mai. Stombs 23:16, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)

Wanted ad: Stombs
Hey, Stombs, if you're there, could you please leave a message for me on this page, or on my talk page, so I can talk to you? I really hope you don't let all the VfD listings put you off editing, and I feel kind of bad about that BJAODN crack. (Even though actually making it to BJAODN would be quite an honor - they're very selective these days. :-)) Bishonen 22:16, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Kiwi bloke
Hello, Stombs, very glad to hear from you. Nice to see you bluelinked, too! Actually, I was mostly worried that you'd notice I'd put up yet more of your pages for deletion - Medinge and Medinge Group - don't know if you did or not - and ship out in disgust at all the stalking and nitpicking. I've been checking out your contribs, an amazing list where you can be observed making excellent edits for twelve hours at a stretch or so. At what I thought was an ungodly hour, too :-) (before I figured about New Zealand). It would be a shame if the only feedback you got on all that work was a crapload of deletion boilerplates. Sorry I was so quick to assume you were another Swedish prankster there - it's just that I've been seeing a lot of those lately, back for the autumn term and writing encyclopedic articles about their girlfriends that run "Lhina Hansson is considered by many people to be the best and most beautiful woman in the world, especially by Swedish guitarist Gustav Bjarnason." (What? Well, yes, I suppose it is kind of funny, if you're in the mood for it. :-))

I notice you've done a good deal of copyediting of other people's work, which is a very useful service. See, your edit topic for the Nanjing Massacre caught my eye: "Serious repairs to typos, grammar—does no one check these?" That's just it: yes, someone does. You did. That's how the wiki works. There's no hierarchy of editing, everybody's an editor, and skilled English speakers are jumping in all the time, the way you did, to give articles a shine, especially new articles by non-native speakers. Many of those do need what's referred to as Cleaning up (or in extreme cases, need Tender loving care). There's a Wikipedia section called Cleanup, where people list entries they come across that are or could be valuable for their encyclopedic content, in order to request that somebody else clean them up. Ideally, the somebody would have good English plus some interest in the subject, but editors are encouraged to Be Bold in selecting themselves for this job, as for everything  else. Me, for instance, I just cleaned up an "Engrish" article about a little-known manga book, a subject I know less than nothing about. Suicidally bold, you might say. Anyway, if you think you might be interested in doing some work on Cleanup, I think you could do a lot of good deeds there, with your excellent writing skills. I feel pompous saying welcome to Wikipedia - I've only been here a month myself - but welcome anyway, Stombs. (Btw,it can be a little risky to put messages at the top of talk pages - the convention is to put them at the bottom, and that's where people tend to look for them.) Bishonen 16:56, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Old cars
Thanks for your contribution on the Australian version of the Plymouth Valiant. I'm always interested in learning something new about old cars. RivGuySC 02:30, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Your info about the Monaro/Riviera was new to me and I'll certainly do something with it. Like you, I'd thought the new GTO looked more Buickish. There's nothing there that says Pontiac to me except the grille. RivGuySC 02:06, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

GM Daewoo
Thanks for your contribution to GM Daewoo Motors. Finally this stub is growing. Very much appreciated. Have a nice day. Kokiri 07:54, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for telling me about this a couple of months ago, Stombs. I have just signed on. I'm very flattered about what you wrote, too. Jackyan 23:10, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Liter->L
In text, I would leave it as litre or liter, depending on the local usage. So if I was talking about "less than a liter of Ketchup" or "multi-litre engines" I would leave it at that. But if it's a mark notating a metric, like "2.2 L engine" we should use the SI convention of using a space then the short symbol - this was discussed in thy wiki style area somewhere a couple of months ago. What do you think?

Don't worry - I know you mean well and aren't picking on me! We're all here to make this the best it can be! --SFoskett 15:18, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

 * Since you've chosen option #1, please copy and paste the text into your user page, which will add the banner describing your choice.   – Ram-Man (comment) (talk)   22:32, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

Cosworth pic
Stombs, I was really pleased to read your nice comment on my RS Cosworth pic. I've put thirty car pics on in the last four days, all taken by myself last summer. Thanks again, such comments are very much appreciated - Adrian Pingstone 21:51, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Votes for deletion/Impreza
Could we redirect to Subaru Impreza and could you, of course, as nominator, rescind the VfD nomination? Ty! Samaritan 23:23, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:19-vc-sle.jpg
What licence is Image:19-vc-sle.jpg which you uploaded released under? Somebody in the WWW 10:54, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * There is no such tag as CopyrightFreeUse. I think you must mean instead. Somebody in the WWW 06:31, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Note to self: I've replied directly to the above user—the tag was not incorrect at the time. Stombs 08:57, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Holden Zafira in NZ
Tena koe,

I've looked at the Holden NZ website for several years, and have never seen the Zafira featured, although Opel-badged used Japanese imports are on sale locally according to this website. Only this Australian website has any mention of the Holden Zafira. We get a few Opel-badged cars from Ireland in the UK (but as brand new parallel imports). Quiensabe 01:16 UTC 10 Jan 2005

Note: the Zafira was indeed sold as a Holden in New Zealand and many web sites indicate this.

Brazilian Ford Sierras
I've seen several references to Brazilian Ford Sierras, but I doubt seriously that the Sierra was ever sold, let alone produced, in that country. I speak Portuguese and I've seen numerous websites that confirm this. That segment of the market was served by the Del Rey (a local design despite the resemblance to the last Cortina/Taunus) and the Versailles, a clone of the VW Santana.

It seems unlikely that Ford do Brasil would have tooled up for production of a car that it wouldn't have sold locally, not least as everything they would have produced would have been for the local market. The facelifted Sierra was assembled in Venezuela, so maybe that would have been the source for the Merkur.

Quiensabe Jan 10 2005 13:13 UTC

Quiensabe is correct: I meant the Argentinian models.

Image:0817tmp3.jpg
Where did you get Image:0817tmp3.jpg from? It is obviously not a "Ford New Zealand publicity photograph", as it has a registration plate from Victoria, Australia in the photo. Somebody in the WWW 03:05, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Again responded: source was not incorrect. Stombs 08:59, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Volkswagen Golf Plus
No problem. As you can see I've moved most of the content formerly under "Variants" to the specific model sections. This makes more sense to me. SamH 10:47, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Mazda Celtus?
I just saw this article created - you have in the past warned the user responsible (82.42.151.164) for creating fake articles about cars - is this one the same? Regards, Smoddy | Talk 16:55, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Nguyet Anh Duong
why did you chose to Delete the page on Nguyet Anh Duong she is a Influential Vietnamese American.

-Did you take the time to read the article?

-*Bomb Lady: Vietnamese American Makes Tools for War on Terror by Pacific News Service

-Nguyet Anh Duong Accomplishment in Naval technology saved lifes of American Soliders in Iraq and Afganistan.

Would you reconsider your vote?--Bnguyen 06:47, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Apology for my edits
Apologies for my vandalism. I will confine them to the sandbox. I am new to this Wikipedia thing. Advice would be appreciated on using Wikipedia, I am new to this. Please don't ban me. I apologise for any fake articles - these can now be confined to the sandbox. 82.42.151.164 14:13, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

Opel Manta in UK
The Opel Manta was never badged as a Vauxhall. True, there was a Vauxhall Cavalier coupe and 'Sportshatch', which used the same bodyshells, but those were dropped in 1981, the same year in which Opel dealerships merged with Vauxhall ones. The Manta was the last car to be sold as an Opel in the UK, when it was dropped in 1988. (The Senator was rebadged as a Vauxhall in 1984, but the Monza remained an Opel until it was dropped two years later.)

This site has the history of the Manta, and the Cavalier equivalents. Quiensabe 20 Jan 2005 17:02

Quiensabe is correct—corrected my own info.

Nissan Pulsar/Sunny
Well, I was about to argue with you about the Pulsar/Sunny thing, but then I got confused after some Google searches told me that the B14 and N15 platforms had the same 2535 mm wheelbase and suspension layout (McPherson strut/trailing arm at the front and multilink/beam axle at the rear) as the outgoing B15 Sunny and the current N16 Almera, Sylphy, Sentra and Wingroad. I'm guessing the same underpinnings were retained between generations. Incidentally, one of those searches turned up a New Zealander named ant_marter on the freshalloy.com forum. Was that you? --Pc13 10:34, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

De Lorean vote
Because you voted at Talk:De Lorean on whether or not to move that page to De Lorean Motor Company, I thought you might like to know that another vote has been started at Requested_moves. SamH|Talk 18:30, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Mitsubishi Mirage
I added a fact that Mirage & Colt are sold alongside each other in Australia, and you deleted it saying Mitsubishi ceased selling Mirage's in Australia in 2003. However, if you go to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com.au you plainly see both Mirage and Colt for sale. This is also confirmed by phoning Mitsubishi Motors Australia.

Maybe in New Zealand it has ceased selling, but not Australia.

And this was added here … why?

Isuzu Gemini
I wrote an article about the Isuzu Gemini in German Wikipedia. There you've got a copyrighted picture of the '85 FF Gemini I'd like to ask you if I can copy it into my German Gemini article -Honza 19:55, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:27, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the vote of confidence on my new adminship - looks like it's your time too! I'll nominate or support you...  --SFoskett 20:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

GM Daewoo

 * As outlined in WikiProject Automobiles, the home market information is used as the basis in Wikipedia. Stombs 13:50, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Why did you delete tons of useful information from the original articles (for ex. Chevrolet Nubira) in the process of a copy and paste move, which is NOT how the articles should be moved anyway, and replaced it with information that is simply full of errors? I'm reverting your edits. Please list the pages on WP:RM if you feel there's a need to move them. --DmitryKo 20:28, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Image source/licensing for Image:86tre nb.gif
This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Oh well, too late—did not see this till December. I'll just make a note to put source info in future. Stombs 00:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

NZ resident
Hi, I see you're another NZ-based person. If you like, you can add the template to your user page, and this will automatically add you to the category of Wikipedians in New Zealand. --LesleyW 06:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Important WikiProject Automobiles Discussion
Hello! As a WikiProject Automobiles member, I just thought you might want to input your opinions on an important discussion we're currently having about whether articles regarding similar vehicles should be merged into one or split by brand. If you would like to comment or read further, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles. Thank you in advance for your thoughts and feedback. Airline 23:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Isuzu_Aska_(1994).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Isuzu_Aska_(1994).jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 05:55, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Isuzu_Aska_(2000).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Isuzu_Aska_(2000).jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Auckland meetup
Just to let you know that a meetup is planned in Auckland for the 25th of June (see Meetup/Auckland for more details), and that you are cordially invited. GeorgeStepanek\talk 00:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Pontiac GTO (1974, studio).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pontiac GTO (1974, studio).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angr (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Liz Shaw
I noticed that on Talk:Liz Shaw (New Zealand) you asked then if anyone nominates the article for deletion to tell you. Well, I have, so I am. --Midnighttonight 03:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

If you want can you take a look at Infiniti G20?
I noticed some of your edits and would like it if you took a look at the Infiniti G20 article. No pressure if you do not feel like it. Zoli Elo 06:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Holden Premier (HG series, 1970) s.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Holden Premier (HG series, 1970) s.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 01:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Stombs: thanks for the St Mark’s reference! Just spotted it. Jack Yan 05:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ford Laser GL 4-door (1990).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ford Laser GL 4-door (1990).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a free image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Also Image:Ford LTD (1999).jpg and Image:Ford Fairlane (1997).gif

Image:Holden Monaro GTS (HG series, 1970).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Holden Monaro GTS (HG series, 1970).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Roguegeek (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:EH Premier.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:EH Premier.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Roguegeek (talk) 17:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Holden Premier (HG series, 1970).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Holden Premier (HG series, 1970).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Roguegeek (talk) 17:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rambler American Rogue (1968).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rambler American Rogue (1968).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok 20:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

 * P.S. Also Image:1991 Ford Sierra 3-door.jpg, and any other non-free images of cars you may have uploaded.

Unspecified source for Image:Honda Jazz (1993).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Honda Jazz (1993).jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Honda Jazz (1993).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Honda Jazz (1993).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Automobiles Notification
Hi Stombs, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting   where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add   to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk 04:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mazda Roadpacer 2400.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mazda Roadpacer 2400.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 15:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nissan Sunny 1200 GX (B210 series, grille).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nissan Sunny 1200 GX (B210 series, grille).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

English usage
I now know what you mean about editing difficulties in Wikipedia! See the Beatles’ capitalization discussion (I imagine you can find it under my history). Let the amateurs rule!—Jack Yan 23:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Welcome to my world, Jack!—Stombs 12:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Mainzeal
Calm down, man. You start editing the German-language Wikipedia and let me accuse you of mangling *my* first language before you accuse *me* of 'imperial overreach' into yours, okay? The article was 100% my creation up to that point, and you are welcome to fix it without getting all in a jiffy. Cheers, MadMaxDog 08:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Duly responded.

Gordon Jackson
With regard to the years, it is Wikipedia policy not to link lone years. I deleted the cookery show for two reasons; 1) How was written (saying he "even" did something doesn't sound very encyclopedic) and 2), its completly unreferenced. I will reword it now, and it would be useful if you reference it. --UpDown 10:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, I now see where it is mentioned in the reference. --UpDown 10:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Auckland Meetup 2 Scheduled - Feb 10 2007
You are all invited to Auckland Meetup 2 on the afternoon of Saturday February 10th 2007 at Galbraith's Ale House in Mt Eden. Please see Meetup/Auckland 2 for details. You can also bookmark Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. - SimonLyall 05:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Audi_NSU_range_(1969).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Audi_NSU_range_(1969).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Holden Kingswood (HX series, 1976).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Holden Kingswood (HX series, 1976).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Renata 03:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Proton Tiara.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Proton Tiara.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 08:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Arna_200.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Arna_200.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Arna 200.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arna 200.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Millionth Holden.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Millionth Holden.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leyland 18-22 series grilles.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leyland 18-22 series grilles.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Citroën Bijou.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Citroën Bijou.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan Bishop
An article you previously voted on in an AfD has been re-nominated. You can see the discussion at This link. Cardydwen (talk) 14:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Triumph Toledo 2-door.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Triumph Toledo 2-door.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Stombs! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Hilary Timmins -
 * 2) Vendela Kirsebom -
 * 3) Kylie Bax -
 * 4) Sarah Bradley -
 * 5) Panagiotis Papadopoulos -

AfD nomination of Jack Yan
An editor has nominated Jack Yan, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.- gadfium 19:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jack Yan
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jack Yan. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Jack Yan (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Medinge Group
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Medinge Group. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Medinge Group. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:8-idealog-cover-small.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:8-idealog-cover-small.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of St Mark's Church School

The article St Mark's Church School has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * non-notable school. Unable to verify by independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fages (talk) 12:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:1980 Austin Metro Range.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:1980 Austin Metro Range.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fleet Command (talk) 19:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lucire-cover-2006.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lucire-cover-2006.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lucire-cover-20.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lucire-cover-20.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Idealog

The article Idealog has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Written like an advert. Internet search does not reveal notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Schwede 66  02:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay
Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics.  Schwede 66  09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stombs


text:
User talk:Mr. Paradox

Hi Mr. Paradox, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:

 * Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
 * The help centre and FAQs
 * The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~. Some people do not pay attention to unsigned comments. An important note: Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

But above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

TPK 06:22, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Big O Season Three
Where'd you hear the news? The 'Save Big O' guys are still in force, and I haven't seen anything at AS. --67.65.112.219 04:31, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I must apologize for that one. I completely misread a message on TV Tome (relating to Season One Uncut airing on Toonami UK), and thus spread a false rumor. Again, I apologize. -- Mr. Paradox, 8:52 PM, 10 Mar 2005

"Fanon" page
Joey Wheeler a.k.a. Katsuya Jonouchi DOES have a drunk father... in the manga and Toei's Yu-Gi-Oh! series. His dad doesn't appear in Nihon Ad System's second series, though. (The second series is on US TV) WhisperToMe 06:26, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Acknowledged. As noted in our e-mails, I'm a little out of the loop on that one.

Classic Rock
Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most like classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! 00:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Warden Ackerman
An editor has nominated Warden Ackerman, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Ng.j 20:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Out of character
I have nominated Out of character, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Out of character. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pcap ping  17:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

"Keelhaul Key" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Keelhaul Key. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC  678  20:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

"Sir Kibble" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sir_Kibble&redirect=no Sir Kibble] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Mr. Paradox


text:
User talk:Icd

Hi Icd, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:

 * Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
 * The help centre and FAQs
 * The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~. Some people do not pay attention to unsigned comments. An important note: Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

But above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

TPK 06:23, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi Ian!
G'day Ian,

Nice to see you around on Wikipedia.

Best regards,

--pjf 23:17, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Noted your edit comment on the Falcon page. I'm curious as to where the rule comes from that "more horsepower" is incorrect, as opposed to "more power." I'm not sure I see the essential difference. RivGuySC 03:15, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I've answered this question on your talk page. Icd

Howdy, Icd. Or G'day.

I did think over your answer, but I'm not really convinced this is more than a style preference. For one thing, engine power is commonly measured in both horsepower and torque, so just saying more power is not precise. And I lean more to the rule that if fluent native speakers would readily say it and understand it, then it's correct enough, and I think "more horsepower" would certainly fall into that category. However, different strokes for different folks--or, to each his own. RivGuySC 03:55, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Stolen Generation
Be bold. You've given your reasoning, go ahead and do it. The worst that will happen is that someone will revert, and that's no crime. If they do, then check the talk page, then message them asking why they reverted. Be polite. Invite them to the talk page, and everything will be sweet. If it isn't, leave me a message and I'll try to assist.

Incidently, welcome to Wikipedia!

Your friendly neighbourhood Aussie administrator, Ta bu shi da yu 12:34, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

re: Stratocaster
The change was removing a list of 'famous Stratocaster players' that had been pasted into a paragraph where it didn't belong. If you want to include favorite Stratocaster players, please add them to the existing list at the bottom of the article. Auto movil 15:15, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Also, thanks for the mild smackdown on marking edits. You're right. See the note on my talk page. Auto movil 15:59, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks! I appreciate your comment. It's something of a burden to monitor these articles I've mostly written (guitars, punk rock, food, etc.), and I do get it wrong sometimes, for which I apologize. Your edits were, I thought, not in the right place, but good edits. I'm sorry if I rankled. Auto movil 04:37, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Socialization
Ohhhhhhh, okayyyyyyy-- :-)   Elf | Talk 06:38, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I wonder what on earth this means? Icd 10:00, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

Referring to your comment on my talk page. Read as a long-suffering agreement to arm twisting but with a lighthearted smile. Or whatever. Elf | Talk 01:35, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Pentax
All I did was try to make sense of the previous statement "Asahi bought the name "Pentax" from the East German camera manufacturer VEB Zeiss Ikon, which probably derived it from PENtaprism and conTAX, because it also incorporated the use of a 42mm screw mount." I agree that my assumption that it meant the 42mm screw came with the name was just that, an assumption, but I couldn't see what else the writer might have meant. Since you queried it I looked on www.pentax.com which says "The Pentax name was created in 1957, derived from a combination of the words PENTAprism and refleX in recognition of Asahi Optical Co. Ltd being the first manufacturer to incorporate a pentaprism viewfinder and reflex mirror system into a camera." This brings into question whether they actually bought the name at all. A statement from http://www.cameraquest.com/pentorig.htm further clouds the issue "42mm thread mount which later became known as the Pentax or universal screw mount. It wasn't really the Pentax mount though, since the 42mm screw mount was introduced on the East German Contax S in 1949.", though the mention of Contax is reminiscent of the original. If you can find out any more I would not argue with subsequent changes, especially since I didn't make the original statement. --SMeeds 23:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for getting me out of that one. You're edit looks fine to me. I am more knowledgeable about the technical rather than the historical aspects, though some of what I know is now historical, if that makes sense. I agree it is clear that the 42mm mount is a side-issue. I realised after I wrote the above that the original writer probably meant that the name Pentax referred obliquely to the use of the 42mm thread, which had previously been used in a Contax. That didn't seem likely because it would amount to (admittedly covert) use of someone else's trade name. --SMeeds 22:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Meetup in March
I see that you are listed as a participant in the WikiProject Melbourne. If you are a Melbourne resident I would appreciate your views on the suggested Meetup in March. Please give some indication of your interest, or otherwise, in the idea. Even a simple "No thanks" with your user name would be welcome and assist in assessing the level of support for a meetup. Thank you.. Cuddy Wifter 06:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Air Transat Flight 236
Thanks for the note, and sorry for the misunderstanding. I'd never heard that expression before in my life. I've now linked Air Transat Flight 236 to the Flameout stub. TheMadBaron 09:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Timeline of satellite...
I was still in the process of verifying facts for the note now added to that article. Rmhermen 05:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

ATMC
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ATMC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Powers T 23:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Internet in Australia
still interest in fixing internet in Australia?

I have made some changes but need help.

Digmores (talk) 01:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Masi Bicycles
A tag has been placed on Masi Bicycles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Hey Icd. Keep up the good work on Masi Bicycles. If you check the talk page, you will see I am getting really annoyed at how hard you are having to work just to make a nice article on a cycling company.  It's just frustrating for me to see all the pushback on the kind of contributions that built Wikipedia, and made it as good and as comprehensive as it is today. Cheers from Canada, —fudoreaper (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup
Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 04:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Triumph Daytona 675, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AS 2805

The article AS 2805 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Go ahead, I am totally fine with soft deletion (i.e. copy the content to your proposed target and redirect the article there). Tnx! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for DMZ_(computing)
An article that you have been involved in editing—DMZ_(computing)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 19:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AS 2805

The article AS 2805 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Similar to Articles for deletion/AS3959, notability not established with substantive independent sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 02:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of AS 2805 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AS 2805 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AS 2805 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. TarnishedPathtalk 11:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Icd


text:
User talk:Subsolar

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mooks clothing company for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mooks clothing company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mooks clothing company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Konhume (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Subsolar


text:
User talk:YuTanaka~enwiki

Hi YuTanaka, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:

 * Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
 * The help centre and FAQs
 * The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~. Some people do not pay attention to unsigned comments. An important note: Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

But above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

TPK 06:25, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Manual of style
On Wikipedia, we use macrons for romanized Japanese. WhisperToMe 01:38, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called YuTanaka. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name YuTanaka~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 04:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:YuTanaka~enwiki


text:
User talk:Gnarly~enwiki

Hi Gnarly, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:

 * Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
 * The help centre and FAQs
 * The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~. Some people do not pay attention to unsigned comments. An important note: Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

But above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

TPK 06:26, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Gnarly. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Gnarly~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gnarly~enwiki


text:
Glaive

A glaive, sometimes spelled as glave, is a type of pole weapon, with a single edged blade on the end, known for its distinctive design and versatile combat applications. There are many similar polearms such as the war scythe, the Japanese naginata, the Chinese guandao (yanyuedao), the Korean woldo, and the Russian sovnya.

A glaive typically consists of a single-edged blade approximately 45 centimeters long affixed to a pole measuring about 2 meters. The blade is secured in a socket-shaft configuration, akin to an axe head, as opposed to having a tang like a sword or naginata. Some variations of glaive blades were even forged with a small hook on the reverse side to better engage mounted opponents, earning them the name "glaive-guisarmes."

In the 1599 treatise "Paradoxes of Defence" by English gentleman George Silver, the glaive is described as being used in a manner similar to other polearms like the quarterstaff, half pike, bill, halberd, voulge, and partisan. Silver considered this class of polearms superior to all other hand-to-hand combat weapons.

The Morgan Bible, also known as the Maciejowski Bible, features illustrations of two-handed glaives used on horseback, showcasing their historical application in mounted combat.

The contemporary term for this weapon may have been "faussart," which referred to various single-edged weapons related to the scythe, alongside terms like falchion, falcata, or fauchard, all derived from the Latin term for "scythe."

Historical records suggest that the glaive may have originated in Wales and remained a national weapon until the late 15th century. There is a mention of a warrant from the first year of Richard III's reign, dated 1483, for the production of "two hundred Welsh glaives," further highlighting its historical significance in weaponry."It has been argued that the glaive had its origin in Wales, and that it remained a national weapon until the end of the XVth Century. Grose mentions a warrant (Harleian MS., No. 433) issued to Nicholas Spicer, dated the first year of Richard III's reign, 1483 for enrolling of smiths for "the making of two hundred Welsh glaives" – twenty shillings and sixpence being the charge for thirty glaives with their staves, made at Abergavenny and Llanllowel."

Design
The glaive typically consists of three main components:

 * Blade: The blade of the glaive varies in size and shape, but it is generally a curved blade with a single cutting edge. This blade design allows for effective slashing and cutting movements.
 * Shaft: The glaive's shaft is typically made of wood or metal and ranges from 6 to 7 feet in length, making it a polearm suitable for thrusting and striking from a distance.
 * Hilt: At the base of the shaft, the glaive often features a hilt or grip that allows the wielder to maintain a secure hold during combat.

Usage
The glaive was a versatile weapon on the battlefield. It was effective for both cutting and thrusting, and its long reach allowed warriors to strike opponents from a relatively safe distance. Some common glaive techniques included sweeping strikes to disarm or incapacitate enemies and thrusting attacks to penetrate armor.

Glaives were used by infantry and could be particularly effective against mounted opponents, as they could target the horse or rider. These weapons were employed in various historical conflicts, from the medieval European battlefields to the Far East.

Cultural significance
The glaive holds cultural significance not only for its martial applications but also for its representation in art, literature, and folklore. It is often depicted in medieval tapestries and illuminated manuscripts, showcasing its presence in European history.

The weapon has made appearances in numerous fantasy and historical fiction works, cementing its place in popular culture. It is frequently associated with knights and medieval warriors in contemporary portrayals of chivalry.

Modern interpretations
In the modern era, the glaive continues to be popular among enthusiasts of historical reenactment, martial arts, and collectors of historical weaponry. It is often featured in stage combat and reenactment events. The glaive has also influenced the design of fictional weapons in various forms of media, including video games, movies, and television series.

Other uses of the word
The word "glaive" has historically been given to several very different types of weapons; it originated from French. Almost all etymologists derive it from either the Latin (gladius) or Celtic (*cladivos, compare claymore) word for sword. Nevertheless, all the earliest attestations in both French and English refer to spears. It is attested in this meaning in English roughly from the 14th to 16th centuries.

Around the same time, it also began being used as a poetic word for sword. In Modern French, glaive refers to short swords, especially the Roman gladius.

The term "glaive" is used in the science-fiction/fantasy film Krull to refer to a thrown weapon, similar to the shuriken, chakram, or mambele, which can return to the thrower, much like a boomerang. Glaive has been used to describe this fictional type of weapon in films, video games (such as Warframe and Dark Sector), and other fantasy media since.

title: Glaive


text:
Minolta Maxxum 7000

The Minolta MAXXUM 7000 (7000 AF in Europe and α-7000 in Japan) 35 mm SLR camera was introduced in February 1985. It was the first camera to feature both integrated autofocus (AF) and motorised film advance, the standard configuration for later amateur and professional single lens reflex cameras.

Overview
Although the Nikon F3AF (1983), Pentax ME F and Chinon CE-5 already had presented autofocus single lens reflex cameras, autofocusing could not be achieved without the use of special motorised AF lenses. The Pentax ME F had focus sensors in the camera body, while the Chinon CE-5 used a lens with built-in active infrared sensors. Nikon already had a camera with integrated motor drive on the market, the N2000 (F-301 in UK), but its autofocus counterpart, the N2020 (F-501 in UK), appeared after the Maxxum/Dynax.

The Minolta 7000 had its AF sensors and the focusing drive inside the camera body, and as a result the lenses could be much smaller and cheaper. The aperture and focus were mechanically driven through the lens mount from the camera body. However, electronically controlled buttons on the camera body now replaced the mechanical aperture ring on the lens, and the setting was electronically displayed on the body and in the viewfinder. The metal housing of older Minolta SLR cameras was replaced with a lighter, cheaper body made of plastics. In other respects, the Maxxum offered most of the standard features of other cameras of the day, with the exception of a rather low flash sync speed (1/125 sec.) and no multi-exposure capability.

Minolta introduced a new lens mount, the A system, breaking compatibility with its earlier manual-focus lenses in the MC and MD system. The A lens mount is still the same today, but some modifications have been made to the electronic contacts to facilitate new functions such as motor zoom (xi lenses, now discontinued) and a more sophisticated flash metering system (ADI).

Konica and Minolta merged their photo and camera businesses in October 2003. In January 2006 Konica Minolta announced that they were withdrawing from the camera and photo business, transferring their assets to Sony, who since have continued development of the A system through their Alpha series.

Autofocus
When Pentax and Nikon entered the autofocus segment, both used a similar passive array AF system as Minolta, but retained compatibility with their existing manual-focus K and F mounts respectively. Canon, like Minolta, chose to change its mount completely, introducing the EOS 600-series a few years later, breaking compatibility with the former FL and FD lens mounts. Canon's EOS system was the only fully electronic lens mount system, with no mechanical connections between camera body and lens: the autofocus motors were housed in the lens itself, rather than the camera body.

Legal troubles
Early Maxxum 7000 cameras were inscribed "MAXXUM 7000" with a crossed 'XX'. The oil giant Exxon considered this to be a violation of its trademark, because the XX in its logo was linked in a similar fashion. As a result, Minolta was allowed to distribute cameras that were already produced, but was forced to change the stylistic XX in Maxxum and implement this change in new production. All Maxxum cameras produced thereafter had a regularly scripted double 'X'.

Minolta's autofocus design was found to infringe the patents of Honeywell, a U.S. corporation. After protracted litigation, Minolta in 1991 was ordered to pay Honeywell damages, penalties, trial costs and other expenses in a final amount of $127.6 million.

title: Minolta Maxxum 7000


text:
Talk:Ellendale, Minnesota

Untitled
Does it really qualify as a city with 590 people? --Sam Francis

"Village" Is the correct term for Ellendale. --[Cole Mullenmaster] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.197.180.155 (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 one external links on Ellendale, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fpopest%2Fdata%2Fcities%2Ftotals%2F2012%2FSUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721034521/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_GCTPL2.ST13&prodType=table to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_GCTPL2.ST13&prodType=table
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160204042203/http://www.postalhistory.com/postoffices.asp?task=display&state=MN&county=Steele to http://www.postalhistory.com/postoffices.asp?task=display&state=MN&county=Steele
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fgeo%2Fwww%2Fgazetteer%2Ffiles%2FGaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ellendale, Minnesota