text:
User talk:Dbenbenn

 * /archive1 01:15, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * /archive2 22:29, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * /archive3 16:34, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * /archive4 14:28, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * /archive5 21:59, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * /archive6 03:02, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * [ archive 7] 23:32, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * [ archive 8] 21:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * [ archive 9] 22:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Bad User Pages
here you go -- G. Gearloose (?!) 18:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Preemptive blocking?
Hi Curps. I'm curious why you blocked [a certain user], given that that user doesn't exist. If this is some kind of preemptive blocking of a potential inappropriate username, it seems a little futile to me, since a vandal could simply use a slightly different name. Or is there some other reason this makes sense? User:dbenbenn 00:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Apparently accounts do get deleted sometimes, and with good reason. You should probably delete the userpage too so it doesn't appear in the category. Keep up the good work.--Craw Returns 00:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * There are also 135 variations on your own name that are blocked though the user doesn't exist, such as User:Ķûŕṕś. Is it true that user accounts actually get deleted?  If so, do you think these deleted accounts should remain blocked?  User:dbenbenn 00:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't believe that the block page even lets you block a nonexistent username. -- Curps 00:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Good point. I just unblocked User:Ķûŕṕś, and then was not able to reblock.  I guess that indicates the account was indeed deleted sometime between January 7 and now.  Odd.  Anyway, I guess it makes sense just to leave all those names blocked.  User:dbenbenn 00:43, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

 * It's probably better to leave them blocked... I don't imagine there's anything stopping those names from being recreated, and there's no valid reason to allow obvious impostor names to edit. Deletion of usernames is news to me, the only times I've seen usernames "deleted" were as the result of a name change requested by the user and carried out by a bureaucrat, and then I've sometimes seen a familiar username suddenly recreated for the first time (presumably by the original user wishing to reserve it against use by impostors). -- Curps 01:06, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi David, no problem. Subpages used to be used widely on WP. However a decree came from on high not to use them. I was told that subpages were never ever to be used, by the developers. I got into trouble last year for using a subpage to test out a format for proposed infoboxes. But if that prohibition has been recinded, no problem. The thing about WP is that rules change overnight but no-one tells people. One minute subpages were all the rage. The next minute they were "never ever use subpages". Obviously they are OK again. FearÉIREANN \(caint) 03:06, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's certainly true about rules! I think the current rule is that subpages for articles are verboten, but they're recommended for talk page archives.  User:dbenbenn 04:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

qif
Hi. Re : Could you please add Category:Templates using ParserFunctions to templates you convert to #if? Thanks. I can't do that, due to the page protection. --Ligulem 23:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. I'll try to remember that in the future.  User:dbenbenn 23:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

JD-month error?
gives = 15. As far as I know, there is no 15th month ;). Perhaps that template only works for days after a certain date?  I'm working on simplifying the calculation, but I don't know how to make the right calculation in the first place.  User:dbenbenn 00:25, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

 * Hi. The JD-month template assumes conversion to months in the Gregorian calendar... which came into existence in 1582. Thus, before that it would be producing 'months' for a calendar system which did not exist yet. A Julian date of '123' would be one-hundred and twenty-three days after the start of the Julian period... in 4713 BC. :] The formulas for this and the related JD-day and JD-year templates should work correctly for all dates in the Gregorian calendar system. For anything prior to October 1582 we get into hypothetical calendaring and it's fairly meaningless. The formulas can be derived from the Julian date article or the template. --CBDunkerson 00:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks. I've added that explanation to Template:JD-month.

 * Another question: I noticed that right now is giving 21, not 22.  Julian day explains that the day rolls over at noon, but the Gregorian calendar still rolls over at midnight.  So is that a mistake?  I guess the fix would be to subtract 0.5 from the parameter to JD-day. User:dbenbenn 05:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * In all the calls to JD-month/day/year (and the hour/minute calculations) add 0.5 to the parameter... precisely for this reason. The best solution will likely be to build the 12 hour shift into ... which is effectively off by 12 hours currently. --CBDunkerson 08:50, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

 * This is caused by another reason. The month artithmetic uses a modulo operator which has not been fixed in the formula used to cover years before the begining of epoch which is very far away in 4800 BC.
 * The exact formula used is now described in the article speaking about Julian day (look at the table where the same formulas are detailed and used on the examples provided), and much care has been taken to implement them in MediaWiki ParserFunctions so that it will avoid all negative numbers since the begining of epoch.
 * Then the three julian day conversion templates were derived from this demonstration table. verdy_p 15:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Orphanbot doesn't know about promophoto?
OrphanBot doesn't realize that promophoto is a license tag. ? User:dbenbenn 00:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

 * In computer science, it's called a race condition: At 00:03 UTC, you uploaded the image with no copyright tag. About 15 seconds later, OrphanBot retrieved the page text and didn't find a copyright tag, so it added the image to the list of images it needed to add "untagged" to.  Between then, and when it got around to actually applying the tag, you added promophoto. --Carnildo 04:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay. It sounds like this bug could easily be fixed: just have OrphanBot re-check the page immediately before applying the no-tag tag, exactly the way a human would do it.  Specifically, a human would edit the page, see whether there's a tag in the page source, and add untagged otherwise.  That completely avoids the race condition, because of MediaWiki's edit conflict feature.  And it's kind of important to fix the bug, because OrphanBot shouldn't be incorrectly tagging images.  User:dbenbenn 04:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Moving images to commons
Hello, is there a way how to move free licensed images to Commons automagically? I also don't feel good doing it as I'm in fact becoming the uploader (who's responsible for copyright issues), while, in fact, I'm just moving it to a central repository. How do you deal with these issues and are there any plans to simplify/smoothen the process? helix84 03:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Ping? helix84 17:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oops, sorry for the slow reply. No, there's no easy way to move images to the Commons.  You just have to download from here, then re-upload.  Commons Helper can help a little, by generating an image description page to copy that has the image history information.  User:dbenbenn 11:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Is there a chance this will change after single login? helix84 12:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I have no idea. User:dbenbenn 00:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

FYI: Copying User:Dbenbenn/bad user pages
I'm going to take a copy of your subpage User:Dbenbenn/bad user pages so that I can modify it. It's at User:Ardric47/Temp1. I saw "Feel free to edit this list if you like," but I can see myself possibly modifying it beyond recognition. Ardric47 00:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:In the news
Hello, Dbenbenn! I noticed that you switched the image on Template:In the news from the .png version to the .svg version. I had switched the preferred .svg file to a .png file because I couldn't upload and protect the .svg version; thus, I switched it to a .png version, which I was able to upload and protect, and then left a request on WP:AN, which seems to have gone unanswered. Because the .svg image is still unprotected (the image has to be uploaded and then protected; protecting only the image page leaves the image vulnerable to vandalism on Commons, where all changes are reflected here) I've gone ahead and switched the flag back to the protected .png version until the .svg version can be uploaded and protected (feel free to do this if your computer has the technical capabilities to do so). Again, see WP:AN for more information. Many thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 00:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

 * You are mistaken. When I changed Template:In the news, I also protected Commons:Image:Flag of Indonesia.svg.  It is not necessary to upload a local copy of an image that is protected on the Commons, since normal users here are not able to overwrite Commons images.  So if an image on the Commons is protected there, it can be changed on the Commons only by Commons admins, and it can be changed here only by local admins.  Cheers, User:dbenbenn 21:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Sorry, I didn't notice that. I apologize. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 00:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image protection
Hi! Thanks, I didn't know that protection at the commons prevented the upload of a file of the same name at wikipedia--that's useful info that I will bear in mind in the future. I was really just responding to a request from User:Flcelloguy, who it appears didn't know that either. --JeremyA 02:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

admin-counts
sorry for the delay. http://tools.wikimedia.de/~river/files/admin-counts/ should be updating again now. kate.

Might I suggest
Hi! I noticed you were active in resolving somethings on this page, which alas, as a 'usage guidline', seems pretty confusing. At the least, some of it is dated or seems to have been superceded by subsequent system software updates. OTOH, I just may be wrong on that suspicion.

Might I suggest archiving anything which is dated, immaterial, or otherwise inappropriate to the task, which is to shed light on when and where the template is to be properly applied. There seems to be a significant difference in the commons application in the new map categories project, wherein they are using it to tag old category names prior to relocating contents, and the use here on wikipedia. OTOH, the category page has a lot of entries if the BOT is running regularly.

Since similar use is suggested in this talk as seems to be the practice on the commons, I'm not sure what is and is not 'proper' application here on wikipedia given the rambling nature of the discussion. In sum, a clear usage section separated from the stale verbage in the discussion seems to be in order. Thanks // Fra nkB 07:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

image tags
Hi David. No worries with that lot, GFDL for all of them is OK by me. Best, Tannin 03:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Pete Doherty picture
You appear to have removed the picture from the Pete Doherty article. As far as I'm aware, it was properly tagged with explicit permission from the copyright holder for use on Wikipedia. If there was a problem with it, it would have been polite to contact me first. I would very much appreciate it if you could do me the courtesy of explaining why you deleted it. OneVeryBadMan 08:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

 * You used the wrong tag on the image. According to the web site you cited, it's licensed under cc-by-nc-sa-2.5, not cc-by-sa-2.5.  Wikipedia doesn't accept noncommercial images.  The Wikipedia-specific permission is irrelevant.  User:dbenbenn 21:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Proposal on Notability
Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa Non-notabilityl is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal Importance is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. Make sure this is defeated! --Ephilei 04:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

List of administrators by edit count
How would I go about executing the script to update the list? I was just curious to see how I stack up. Could a regular user like me do this? And if I can't, could you please update this list? Thanks for your time, and if you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Ian Manka Talk to me! 09:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

What did I do wrong?
Hi Dbenbenn,

I haven't been logged on for quite a while. I was going to submit a picture for the Nemi Ships, when I found this message (click link below):

Just click your BACK button after you view the image.

I cannot find any info in your archives about why these pictures were deleted. Is there a chance that you remember the reasons?

I'm not comfortable in submitting any other pictures until I know what I did wrong. The Akenaten image was created entirely by me, and the Elliot image was published in 1917, and colorized by me.

Regards,

Ken Seamon

Old deleted image
I'm unclear on if this is possible for old image description pages, but could you retrieve the image description of Image:Rudyard kipling.jpg and place it on Image:Rudyard_Kipling_(small).jpg's description page? It's an image you deleted for IFD(a long time ago), and I don't feel its neccessary to clutter DRV with this request. The description page I hope will have some useful copyright information because the (small) image has almost nothing save for the tag. Thanks. Kevin_b_er 23:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

MakBot bot flag needed.
I applied for a bot flag on Commons:Commons:Administrators but after more than two weeks and 9-0 votes in favour, MakBot does not have a flag. My bot has done over 60K edits and the RC is basically useless to folks. I have voluntarily held off any further runs since it appeared folks really preferred that.

But there are a number of things that I need to have the Bot do. Could you take a look and give it a flag? -Mak Thorpe 00:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Mount of the Holy Cross map
Hi---I took out the map of Eagle County that you put on the Mount of the Holy Cross page. As you noted, it needed work; in fact I would say it needed so much work that it wasn't useful enough to leave on the page as is. Let me know if you think differently. Cheers, Spireguy 21:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg
Hi, i'm Dove from the Spanish Wikipedia. I wonder if you can upload the "Iwo Jima Flag Raising" image in commons.wikipedia, in order to make it avalaible to all the wikipedia versions. I dont know too much about licenses and i'm afraid i could make a mistake if i make the upload myself. Thks for your help! 22:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Hydrilla.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hydrilla.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 12:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Hydrillainfestation.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hydrillainfestation.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 12:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Graphics Lab
I saw your name listed on Wikiproject Illustration or  the list of graphic artists, and I thought I'd let you know that a Graphics Lab has been created on EN. Based on the highly successful French and German graphics labs, it seeks to better organise and coordinate our graphic design and photo-editing efforts. Up until now, there has been no common space on EN where users could ask for maps, charts and other SVG files to be created. What's more, the Graphics Lab has discussion boards, tips, tools and links; in sum, a good common workspace. Come help us out! The infrastucture is already in place, and now we need participants. :) -- Zantastik  talk  01:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 03:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Talk:Dots and Boxes
I have replied to your comment of Feb 2005 in Talk:Dots and Boxes --Surturz 05:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Moving of Awards article
The article European Movie Awards is about to me moved back to European Film Awards, as per new information that appeares in the discussion. If you have any objections, please discuss. Hoverfish Talk 09:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Linkimage
Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Template:See deprecation
Hi. Could you check Template talk:See and Template talk:Further. An editor disputes the deprecation.--GunnarRene 11:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

disc. on fair use in portals
there is currently a proposed amendment to include fair use images in the portal space at Fair use/Amendment/Fair use images in portals2. I have decided to contact you because you expressed interest in this topic in the past. Please know that I am contacting all editors who partipated in discussions regarding this at WT:FUC. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 22:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Mathematics CotW
Hey Ben, I am writing you to let you know that the Mathematics Collaboration of the week (soon to "of the month") is getting an overhaul of sorts and I would encourage you to participate in whatever way you can, i.e. nominate an article, contribute to an article, or sign up to be part of the project. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks! --Cronholm144 21:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Myleftfoot1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Myleftfoot1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Venusaur.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Venusaur.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Karen Black as Rayette.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Karen Black as Rayette.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 15:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Toronto gno.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Toronto gno.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

MfD nomination of List of administrators by edit count
I've nominated List of administrators by edit count, a page you created, for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of administrators by edit count and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of List of administrators by edit count during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Mel sa  ran  13:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

your two years old edit on Image:Turkey flag const.png
Do you remember whether you made that edit actually checking that those lines touch? With the current version, it seems to fail Turkish flag specifications. DenizTC 11:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops, did not see this: . DenizTC 12:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

It seems to me that the outer circle of the star is 37/2400*G inside the crescent, it is only ~1.5%, and gives the impression that the vertical line between the intersection points of circles of the crescent is tangent to the outer circle of the star, especially on not so carefully constructed images. I checked the flag on TTK website:. G is approximately 6.6 cm there (on my screen), so the star's circle is approximately 1mm inside the crescent, and if you take a look at it carefully, you can see that. Thanks a lot for your work there. DenizTC 13:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Recent changes to Template:Infobox actor
Do you have any example pages for me to see? I think I understand the issue you're describing. Frankly, it doesn't seem like the template needs fixing, it seems like the articles do, but I can't know without seeing specific examples. It's not really "fair" to use imagesize for other things besides the imagesize.... --MZMcBride 03:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I partially reverted my changes to fix the imagesize issue. Thanks for telling me. Cheers. --MZMcBride 03:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Villianc.svg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Villianc.svg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RageSamurai21655 (talk) 21:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Leigh Van Valen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leigh Van Valen.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 17:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Kiyosi Ito.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kiyosi Ito.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Apbscreenshot.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Apbscreenshot.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Smashing Pumpkins Greatest Hits album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Smashing Pumpkins Greatest Hits album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

You Did the Wrong Thing
I know, Dbenbenn, that you did the wrong thing. I am really intrested in the elements and I think it is important to spare all element articles NO MATTER WHAT. Therfore, I insist you revive the article the way it was before its cruel destruction.

SESSION II:

I have noticed that you have destroyed thousands of articles, especially in January of 2006 and December 2005, especially on January 9, 2006. I need you to explain the reserved space below exactly why you deleted the article on untritrium and untriquadium. DO NOT EDIT ANYTHING ABOVE THE LINE BELOW.

SESSION II, RESPONSE I:

Untritrium:

Untriquadium:

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.192.112.211 (talk) 20:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cof.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cof.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:A Close Shave.png
Thanks for uploading Image:A Close Shave.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:A Grand Day Out.png
Thanks for uploading Image:A Grand Day Out.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Disarm.ogg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Disarm.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Arik Soong in Borderland.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Arik Soong in Borderland.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Creating Images
It looks like you uploaded and others like it. Can you tell me how to create such images, or whom to ask to do so? I'm looking to create images that highlight more than one county. Thanks! Frank |  talk  03:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Billy Green Bush as Elton.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Billy Green Bush as Elton.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Bot approved: dabbing help needed
Hi there. Fritz bot has been approved at Bots/Requests for approval/FritzpollBot for filling in a possible 1.8 million articles on settlements across the world. Now dabbing needs to be done for links which aren't sorted as the bot will bypass any blue links. and I need as many people as possible to help me with WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Places to prepare for the bot. If you could tackle a page or two everything counts as it will be hard to do it alone. PLease also pass on the message to anybody else who you may think might be willing to help. Thankyou  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 12:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Little Prince.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:The Little Prince.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Villianc.svg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Villianc.svg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Help 16:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC) -- ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Help 16:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Philip Fry.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Philip Fry.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FF1 battle MSX.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:FF1 battle MSX.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:FalklandsWarMontage3.jpg
Source is actually all from WikiCommons, thanks for the assumption of good faith, all you had to was ask where they came from. Justin talk 08:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

File:Himmler Hitler.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Himmler Hitler.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  howcheng  {chat} 23:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:A Close Shave.png
Thanks for uploading File:A Close Shave.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Alaska counties maps
Hi. Since you created the svg maps of US counties I figured this might interst you. Graphic_Lab/Image_workshop. Cheers /Lokal_Profil 16:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:1335 BC deaths
I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Criteria for speedy deletion. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding to articles/categories that belong in it.

I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with db-author.

--Stepheng3 (talk) 21:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Benjamin Franklin True Patriot Act
Hi. Isn't it time to delete the Benjamin Franklin True Patriot Act page? How do we go about doing it? Simsong (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Images and media for deletion
I have nominated images and media for deletion for renaming to files for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 17:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

CfD notification
Hey there, a category you created, Category:1349 albums, is being considered to be renamed. Feel free to take part of the discussion, which can be found here. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  22:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chess_position
Template:Chess_position has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. SunCreator (talk) 00:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Wikispecies-logo-PROTECTED.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikispecies-logo-PROTECTED.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Iftrue
Template:Iftrue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 01:19, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Timeline of fictional future events
You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.

You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip 19:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Spiral galaxy arms diagram.png/.svg
Hello David,

I wonder which scientific findings your diagram is based on. After Kepler, one focus of each of the ellipses should be close to the galactic center. – Rainald62 (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Iftrue
Template:Iftrue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Where are you from?
88.246.202.194 (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Where are you from?88.246.202.194 (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Oliver Cromwell Song
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. 2 says you, says two 17:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Question about image copyright at WP:MCQ
Hi, Dbenbenn. I've raised a question about the licensing situation of File:View from National Cycle Network route 47 between Nelson and Hengoed in South Wales.JPG at Media copyright questions, and I thought you might be interested in the discussion. —Bkell (talk) 02:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:A Grand Day Out.png
Thank you for uploading File:A Grand Day Out.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CommonsCat
Template:CommonsCat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Five Easy Pieces, chicken salad sandwich scene.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Five Easy Pieces, chicken salad sandwich scene.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Disarm.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:Disarm.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Our Bodies, Ourselves, Our Cybernetic Arms.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Our Bodies, Ourselves, Our Cybernetic Arms.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:The Little Prince.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Little Prince.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:25, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Template:CommonsCat listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:CommonsCat. Since you had some involvement with the Template:CommonsCat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear Dbenbenn,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 14:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Ragnarok (roguelike).png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ragnarok (roguelike).png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:26, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
Happy birthday Dbenbenn! I know this is a special time for you, so here is my gift: some randomly generated binary code!

One again happy birthday! Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 00:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Our Bodies, Ourselves, Our Cybernetic Arms.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Our Bodies, Ourselves, Our Cybernetic Arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smoking Monkey album cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Smoking Monkey album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Where Tradition Meets Tomorrow.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Where Tradition Meets Tomorrow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg

The file File:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "The file is now available on Commons. After a long discussion, it appears that the copyright was not renewed. It is therefore in the public domain : File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima by Joe Rosenthal.jpg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yann (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chess position
Template:Chess position has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:58, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:21, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice of subpage moved
Hello. This is a message to let you know that a subpage of your user page has been moved to User:Dbenbenn/foo. This has been done since titles with consecutive apostrophes (for example,  or ' ) have been known to cause issues with wiki markup on pages if the page title is linked on other pages. Since the end of 2014, the creation of titles containing consecutive apostrophes has been restricted by Wikipedia's title creation blacklist. The page can now be found at User:Dbenbenn/foo. Feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Protected sister project logos

A tag has been placed on Category:Protected sister project logos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Happy Birthday! Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Happy Birthday! Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

"Mind myths" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mind myths. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 28 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Protected sister project logo
Template:Protected sister project logo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 01:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Wishing Dbenbenn a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 02:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 09:39, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux  Talk 00:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Dbenbenn,

This is to let you know that File:Challenger flight 51-l crew.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 28, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-01-28. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (<span style="color:#FFF;background:#04A;display:inline-block;padding:1px;vertical-align:-.3em;font:bold 50%/1 sans-serif;text-align:center">TALK PAGE ) 15:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

US county maps rendering incorrectly
In 2006 you uploaded a lot of SVG maps of US counties as commons:User:David Benbennick. They have recently started rendering incorrectly. See Teahouse and Teahouse. Do you want to upload fixed versions or should I try to get somebody else? It's too much to do manually and I don't have tools to automate it. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dbenbenn


text:
Category:Arthropods

Arthropods are a phylum of animals.

 * See also : WikiProject Arthropods and Arthropodology.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Category:Arthropods


text:
Eurofighter Typhoon variants

The Eurofighter Typhoon is in service with nine nations: United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, and Austria, with orders for all nine customers still pending as of September 2017. The aircraft has, as of 2016, been provided in a basic air-defense form and has been upgraded to newer production standards which include internal IRST, air-to-ground precision strike capability (with Royal Air Force Typhoons participating in air strikes destroying tanks in Libya in 2011 as their combat debut), and HMSS (helmet-mounted symbology system) helmets. Most of the major systems including the CAPTOR radar and the Defence Aids Sub-System (DASS) are expected to be improved and updated over time, with the radar being updated to an AESA, being the CAPTOR-E/CAESAR, of which the Kuwait Air Force will be the inaugural operator, with first deliveries of their 28 new-built aircraft to commence in 2019.

Development aircraft
Seven development aircraft (DA) were built with varying equipment fits and flight test roles.

 * DA1 🇩🇪

 * DA1's main role was handling characteristics and engine performance.
 * DA1 was assembled in 1992 and first flew on 27 March 1994 with Luftwaffe serial 98+29. The military evaluation phase commenced in 1996. In 1997 after 123 flights, DA1's RB199 engines were replaced by EJ200s, it also was refitted with the Martin-Baker Mk.16A ejector seat and a full avionics fit. Following these modifications it rejoined the flight test programme in 1999. Following the loss of DA6, DA1 was transferred to Spain to undertake the remaining development work including IRIS-T trials.
 * The aircraft was retired on 21 December 2005, eleven years, eight months, and 24 days after its first flight.
 * It is on display at the Flugwerft Schleißheim (external site of the Deutsches Museum) near Munich, Germany.

 * DA2 🇬🇧
 * DA2 undertook envelope expansion, flight control assessment and load trials. The aircraft first flew on 6April 1994 as ZH588. The flight control assessment included development of the Eurofighter's "carefree handling". On 23 December 1997 DA2 became the first Eurofighter to achieve Mach2 and in January 1998 undertook refuelling trials with a RAF VC10. Like DA1, DA2 was upgraded in 1998 with new engines, ejector seat and avionics and rejoined the test programme in August. In 2000 the aircraft was covered with 490 pressure transducers; due to the fact that they were covered by black pads and had associated wiring the aircraft was painted in a gloss black scheme. The pressure transducers measured the effects of various weapons loads and external fuel tanks. In 2002 the aircraft undertook ASRAAM trials, completed carefree handling trials and commenced DASS decoy trials.
 * Now retired and on display in the Milestones of Flight Gallery at the RAF Museum at Hendon.

 * DA3 🇮🇹
 * Weapons systems development.

 * DA4 🇬🇧
 * Twin-seat, radar and avionics development, now on display at the Imperial War Museum Duxford. In the process of being moved to Newark Air Museum, Nottinghamshire.

 * DA5 🇩🇪
 * Radar and avionics development, being upgraded to Tranche 2 standard. German and Spanish contract involved upgrading 130 Eurofighter Typhoon tranche 2 to latest AESA radar and avionics.

 * DA6 🇪🇸
 * Twin-seat, airframe development and handling. DA6 was lost in a crash in Spain in November 2002 after both engines failed. EADS Germany's DA1 was transferred to EADS-CASA.

 * DA7 🇮🇹
 * Navigation, avionics and missile carriage. Now retired in Cameri IAF.

Instrumented production aircraft
The instrumented production aircraft (IPA) are five production standard aircraft fitted with telemetry instruments for dedicated flight testing and further systems development.

 * IPA1 🇬🇧
 * Defensive Aids Sub System (DASS).

 * IPA2 🇮🇹
 * Air-to-surface weapons integration.

 * IPA3 🇩🇪
 * Air-to-air weapons integration.

 * IPA4 🇪🇸
 * Air-to-surface weapons integration and environmental development.

 * IPA5 🇬🇧
 * Air-to-surface and air-to-air weapons integration.

 * IPA6 🇬🇧
 * Converted Series Production Aircraft (BS031)—Tranche 2 Computer Systems.

 * IPA7 🇩🇪
 * Converted Series Production Aircraft (GS0029)—Full Tranche 2 Standard.

 * IPA8 🇩🇪
 * E-Scan radar, enhanced weapon integration and improvements to mission equipment.

Series production aircraft
These are the operational and training aircraft. The model is known as Typhoon in the United Kingdom and export markets and as EF-2000 in Germany, Italy and Spain. However, all Italian aircraft carry the "Typhoon" logo on their tails.

Tranche 1

 * Initial Operational Capability, Basic Air Defence Capability

 * Block 2
 * Air-to-air capabilities

 * Block 5
 * Air-to-air and air-to-ground capabilities, Final Operational Capability (FOC) standard. All Tranche1 aircraft are being upgraded to Block5 capability through the Retrofit 2 (R2) programme.

Tranche 2

 * Block 8
 * New hardware standard with new mission computer

 * Block 10
 * Enhanced Operational Capability (EOC) 1, improved DASS, IFF Mode 5, Rangeless ACMI
 * Air/Air—AIM-120C-5 AMRAAM, IRIS-T digital
 * Air/Ground—GBU-24, GPS-guided weapons, ALARM, Paveway III & IV, Rafael LITENING III

 * Block 15
 * EOC 2
 * Air/Air—METEOR,
 * Air/Ground—TAURUS, Storm Shadow, Brimstone

 * Block 20
 * EOC 3

Tranche 3 / Tranche 3A

 * Incorporating EOC 3 and hardware support for EOC 4
 * Conformal fuel tanks, fibre optic cabling and computer upgrade, defensive system upgrades. The variants actually installed with the Captor-M mechanically scanned array radar because Captor-E AESA radar was not ready for use at the time. This Captor-E radar will be gradually installed on many of these aircraft as it has come into service. Tranche 3A of Kuwait Air Force is the first serial production  batch to receive Captor-E during manufacturing. Captor-E equipped variants are more capable as a multirole combat aircraft.
 * Air/Ground—SPEAR 3, Marte-ER, LITENING IV & V

Tranche 4

 * Latest production standard with unspecified upgrades building upon Tranche 3A specifications.
 * Tranche 4 is a multirole combat aircraft with latest CAPTOR E AESA radar. According to Dirk Hoke, CEO Airbus Defence and Space, "The new Tranche 4 Eurofighter is currently the most modern European-built combat aircraft with a service life well beyond 2060." Germany ordered 30 single-seater and 8 twin-seater Tranche 4 Eurofighters in late 2020 with cost of 5.4 billion euro. The latest order from Germany secures production of Eurofighter Typhoon until 2030. As part of German Eurofighter Typhoon contract, Hensoldt will produce AESA radar for Luftwaffe Eurofighter.
 * Spain ordered 20 Tranche 4 in June 2022 and the upgrading of its existing Tranche 3 aircraft to the new standard.

Italian Air Force aircraft
As of July 2006 the Italian Air Force (Aeronautica Militare Italiana) had one EF-2000 wing, 4º Stormo (4th Wing), which received its first aircraft on 19 February 2004. The 36º Stormo received its first Typhoon on 1October 2007. By 2018 the Italian Air Force had three Eurofighter wings.

Qatar Emiri Air Force aircraft
On 25 August 2022 three newly built Eurofighter Typhoons jets destined to the QEAF (Qatar Emiri Air Force) departed the BAE Systems factory at Warton, UK, to Qatar on their delivery flight to Tamim Airbase, near Dukhan, approximately 80 kilometres west of Doha via Athens.

Spanish Air Force aircraft
As of December 2006 the Spanish Air Force (Ejército del Aire) has one squadron of aircraft. The first aircraft was delivered to Wing 11 in October 2003 at Moron airbase, Spain. In Spanish service, the aircraft is designated the C.16 Typhoon.

Luftwaffe aircraft
As of October 2006 Germany had two active EF-2000 fighter wings, Jagdgeschwader 73 and Jagdgeschwader 74. JG 73 began converting to the Eurofighter in April 2004. JG 74 received its first aircraft on 25 June 2006.

Royal Air Force aircraft

The Typhoon replaced the RAF's Tornado F3 (fighter) and Jaguar (ground attack) forces. They will equip five front-line squadrons, one front-line flight and one reserve squadron, the Operational Conversion Unit (OCU).

 * Typhoon T1
 * The Typhoon T1 is a Tranche 1, batch 1 two-seat trainer.

 * The first Typhoon T1 is one of the Instrumented Production Aircraft (IPA1) and remains part of the BAE fleet. The aircraft's maiden flight was on 15 April 2002. The official in service date for the first RAF Typhoon T1, serial ZJ803, was 30 June 2003. Formal delivery occurred on December 18 at which point 17 Sqn began a full flying programme.

 * The first squadrons, No. 17 OEU and No. 29 OCU Sqns, moved to RAF Coningsby in 2005 to begin establishing an initial operational capability (IOC).

 * In 2001, it was announced that the Royal Air Force (RAF) would not use the aircraft's internal 27 mm Mauser cannon. This was due to a desire to save money by removing gun support costs, ammunition stocks, training costs, etc. The gun was also deemed unnecessary since the missile armament was believed to be adequate in the Typhoon's fighter role. However, because removal of the cannon would affect the aircraft's flight characteristics, requiring modification of the aircraft's flight software the RAF decided all its Typhoons would be fitted with the cannon but that it would not be used or supported. The service argued that this would save money by reducing the requirement for ground equipment, removing training costs and avoiding the fatigue effects of firing the cannon. The RAF maintained the option to activate the cannons at very short notice were operational requirements to change. However, in a third change of policy, The Daily Telegraph reported on 3October 2006 that the RAF will fully utilise the cannon.

 * Typhoon T1A
 * Typhoon T1As are Tranche 1, batch 2 two-seat trainers. There would not normally be a different designation for a different aircraft batch; however, the Batch2 aircraft has a fuel system modification to fix a fuel gauge problem identified in the development aircraft fleet.

 * Typhoon F2
 * The F2 is the single-seat fighter variant. The first F2 is IPA5 and also remains with BAE, its first flight was 6 June 2002.

 * The first operational squadron, No. 3, formed at RAF Cottesmore on 31 March 2006 and moved to its new base RAF Coningsby the following day. No. 11 squadron, the second operational squadron received its first aircraft (ZJ931) on 9 October 2006.

As of June 2018, the RAF had bought 53 Tranche 1 Typhoons. The UK agreed to approve production of "Tranche 2" in December 2004, this tranche will see the RAF receive a further 89 aircraft, bringing its Typhoon inventory to 144. This followed protracted negotiations regarding the early introduction of ground attack capabilities of the aircraft and hence its swing-role capability. While this was always planned it was intended to come at a much later date.

 * Typhoon FGR4
 * Single-seat Block 5 or later aircraft (built or upgraded from F2) are known as Typhoon FGR4s. The new mark number represents the increased capabilities of the Block 5 aircraft (fighter/ground attack/reconnaissance). The FGR4 has from June 2008 achieved the required standard for multi-role operations.

 * Typhoon T3
 * Two-seat Block 5 or later aircraft (built or upgraded from T1) are known as Typhoon T3s.

As of June 2018, the RAF has 67 Tranche 2 Typhoons and has contracted to purchase 40 Tranche3 Typhoons. 107 Tranche2 and3 Typhoons will be modified via "Project Centurion", allowing them to utilise Meteor missiles, Brimstone and Storm Shadow missiles. 24 Tranche1 Typhoons will be retained for UK Quick Reaction Alert purposes, and will not be modified under Centurion. No. IX Squadron, based at RAF Lossiemouth, retains the Tranche1 Typhoon for QRA purposes but also serves the purpose of acting as an aggressor aircraft, similar to that of the USAF Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon. These aircraft worked in conjunction with the 100 Squadron BAe Hawk T.1 aircraft based at RAF Leeming, providing air combat training and dogfight training to RAF and Royal Navy pilots.

In December 2021, the Ministry of Defence stated RAF Typhoons had shot down a drone in Syria, making this their first operational air-to-air engagement and the RAF's first operational kill since 1982.

Navalised Typhoon
Owing to the withdrawal of France from the Eurofighter 2000 project, in part due to France's desire to have a greater role in the development and marketing of the aircraft, the pursuit of a naval Typhoon has never seriously been considered. However, a navalised variant of the aircraft was first proposed in the late 1990s as a potential solution to the UK Royal Navy's need for a Future Carrier-Borne Aircraft (FCBA) for its new (Queen Elizabeth-class) aircraft carriers.

In January 2001, the UK Ministry of Defence formally discounted the option of a navalised Eurofighter for its new aircraft carriers, in favour of the Joint Strike Fighter, which promised to be a more capable, versatile, low-cost and stealthy aircraft that would enter into service circa 2012—a date that tied in well with the in-service date for the new UK aircraft carriers as it stood at that time. The Typhoon, as well as the F/A-18E, Rafale M and an advanced variant of the Harrier were rejected by the United Kingdom on "cost effectiveness grounds", selecting the Short Take Off & Vertical Landing (STOVL) variant of the Joint Strike Fighter in 2002 as the primary option for Fleet Air Arm usage. The STOVL variant of the JSF would later be designated the F-35B Lightning II, entering service with the Fleet Air Arm in 2018.

While the navalised version of the Typhoon was ruled out by the MoD by 2011, there has been limited interest expressed by other nations, such as India, in adapting the Typhoon for aircraft carrier operations.

The proposed variant design would enable the Typhoon to operate from carriers on a Short Take-Off, Barrier Arrested Recovery (STOBAR) basis, using a 'ski jump' ramp for aircraft launch and arresting gear for conventional landing.

In February 2011, BAE debuted a navalised Typhoon in response to the Indian tender. The model offered is STOBAR capable, corresponding to the Indian Navy's future aircraft carrier, INS Vikrant (2013). The changes needed to enable the Typhoon to launch by ski-jump and recover by arrestor hook added about 500 kg to the airframe, however this is now thought to be substantially more given the Typhoon's "unfriendly" design in terms of adapting the airframe to suit sustained naval operations. If the Indian Navy pursues a catapult launch carrier, the Typhoon is completely uncompetitive against tender rivals (e.g. Rafale and Super Hornet) since meeting "...catapult requirements would add too much weight to the aircraft, blunt performance and add substantially to modification costs".

Typhoon EK
On 5 November 2019, Kurt Rossner, Head of Combat Aircraft Systems at Airbus, proposed an Electronic Combat Role (ECR)/Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) capability for the aircraft. The Typhoon ECR/SEAD would be configured with two Escort Jammer pods under the wings and two Emitter Location Systems built into the wingtips. Armament configuration would include four MBDA Meteor, two IRIS-T and six SPEAR-EW in addition to three drop tanks. The plane would be a two-seat variant carrying a mission specialist with access to dedicated electronic warfare and mission control screens.

On 14 March 2022, Christine Lambrecht, German Defense Minister announced that the German government would fund development of the Eurofighter ECR version.

On 29 November 2023, what was now being referred to as Eurofighter EK (Elektronischer Kampf, lit. 'Electronic Combat') was approved by the budget committee of the German Bundestag. According to the German Air Force and Airbus, 15 existing Eurofighters were to be equipped with the Saab AB Arexis EW suite and Northrop Grumman AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM).

title: Eurofighter Typhoon variants