text:
Jim Neidhart

James Henry Neidhart (February 8, 1955 – August 13, 2018) was an American professional wrestler known for his appearances in the 1980s and 1990s in the World Wrestling Federation as Jim "the Anvil" Neidhart, where he was a two-time WWF Tag Team Champion with his real-life brother-in-law Bret Hart in the Hart Foundation. He also won titles in Stampede Wrestling, Championship Wrestling from Florida, Mid-South Wrestling, Memphis Championship Wrestling and the Mid-Eastern Wrestling Federation. He was part of the Hart wrestling family through marriage to his wife Ellie Hart, teaming with various members throughout his career, and appearing with his daughter Natalya Neidhart on the reality television show Total Divas.

Early life
At Newport Harbor High School, Neidhart first gained athletic acclaim for his success in strength-oriented track and field events. He set a California high school record in shot put in 1973 which stood until 1985. After graduating from high school, Neidhart pursued a career in the National Football League (NFL), where he played for the Oakland Raiders and Dallas Cowboys in practices and preseason games.

Early career (1978–1985)
Following his release from the Dallas Cowboys, Neidhart traveled to Calgary to train with Stu Hart and pursue a career in professional wrestling. He worked for Hart's Stampede Wrestling from 1978 to 1983, and again in 1985, during which time he married Ellie Hart, one of Stu's daughters. He was a two-time Stampede International Tag Team Champion, with Hercules Ayala in 1980 and Mr. Hito in 1983. Stu Hart, seeking publicity for Neidhart, promised him $500 to enter and win an anvil toss at the Calgary Stampede. He did, throwing it 11 feet, 2 inches. This earned him the nickname "The Anvil", replacing his prior nickname, "The Animal".

In September 1981, Neidhart appeared in Germany with the Catch Wrestling Association, taking part in the World Catch Cup. From April to May 1982, Neidhart wrestled in Japan for New Japan Pro-Wrestling (NJPW) on its Big Fight Series tour as part of Stampede Wrestling's working relationship with NJPW. In January 1983, he made a second tour with NJPW, competing in its New Year Golden Series.

Neidhart teamed twice with King Kong Bundy for Georgia Championship Wrestling in November 1983. From September 1983 to February 1984, he worked for Mid-South Wrestling, where he and Butch Reed held the Mid-South Tag Team Championship for two and a half months. In March 1984, he made a third tour of Japan with NJPW. From April to August 1984, Neidhart worked for the Continental Wrestling Association. In August 1984, he moved to Championship Wrestling from Florida, winning the NWA Southern Heavyweight Championship and NWA United States Tag Team Championship. In January 1985, he left Florida to join the World Wrestling Federation.

Hart Foundation (1985–1991)
When Stu Hart sold Stampede Wrestling to Vince McMahon, owner of the World Wrestling Federation (WWF), Neidhart and Bret Hart were included in the deal. Initially a singles wrestler, managed by Mr. Fuji, Neidhart debuted on January 21, 1985, in Madison Square Garden, defeating Tony Garea. He wrestled Hart, who had a cowboy gimmick, to a draw twice. Bret, upset with his gimmick, suggested to McMahon that he form a tag team with Neidhart.

The new team was dubbed the Hart Foundation and was managed by Jimmy Hart (no relation to Bret). They made their pay-per-view debut at WrestleMania 2, where they were the last two eliminated from a 20-man battle royal by André the Giant. The Hart Foundation won their first WWF World Tag Team Championship on the February 7, 1987, episode of WWF Superstars (taped January 26) from The British Bulldogs (Davey Boy Smith and The Dynamite Kid), with the help of referee Danny Davis, who was continually "distracted" by checking on Dynamite (laid out of the match early by a megaphone shot from Jimmy), allowing the challengers to double-team Smith. Davis was subsequently fired as referee and began wrestling, aligned with The Hart Foundation. They lost the titles on the November 7 episode of Prime Time Wrestling (taped October 27), to Strike Force (Rick Martel and Tito Santana).

The Hart Foundation wrestled in another 20-man battle royal at WrestleMania IV. Bad News Brown attacked and eliminated Hart to win. Neidhart eventually joined Bret's side in the feud with Brown causing a rift between the team and manager Jimmy Hart. This led them to fire him and before starting a feud with The Fabulous Rougeau Brothers. In the fall of 1988, Jimmy Hart began managing the Rougeaus. The Hart Foundation unsuccessfully challenged Demolition (Ax and Smash) for the tag title at the 1988 SummerSlam, when Ax hit Hart with Jimmy Hart's megaphone for the pin (Hart accompanied Demolition's manager, Mr. Fuji, solely to further his feud with the challengers). The Hart Foundation continued feuding with Jimmy Hart's wrestlers for the next year, teaming with Jim Duggan to defeat Dino Bravo and The Rougeaus in a 2/3 falls match at the 1989 Royal Rumble, then defeating The Honky Tonk Man and Greg Valentine at WrestleMania V. In April 1989, both Hart Foundation members began wrestling singles matches at house shows. Neidhart also had a few shots at Ravishing Rick Rude's Intercontinental Heavyweight Championship in August.

The Hart Foundation reformed full-time in March 1990 in Las Vegas. At WrestleMania VI in Toronto, they defeated The Bolsheviks (Nikolai Volkoff and Boris Zhukov) in 19 seconds. They started a second feud with champions Demolition, who at this point added Crush. At SummerSlam 90 on August 27, The Hart Foundation won the title for a second time in a 2/3 falls match. On October 30, 1990, The Rockers (Shawn Michaels and Marty Jannetty) defeated The Hart Foundation in a two out of three falls match in Fort Wayne, Indiana, to seemingly win the title. During the match, the top rope broke by accident, and the match did not air on television. The Rockers defended the WWF Tag Team title against Power and Glory (Paul Roma and Hercules) on November 3, 1990. Shortly after November 3, the WWF decided to not air the title change and that the title would revert to the Hart Foundation. In his book, Shawn Michaels claims that the Hart Foundation had politicked to keep the title. The WWF has never officially recognized The Rockers' reign. The Hart Foundation soon reignited their feud with Jimmy Hart via his team, Rhythm and Blues (Honky Tonk and Valentine). Jimmy Hart once again cost The Hart Foundation the tag titles at WrestleMania VII, in a match with his new team, The Nasty Boys (Brian Knobs and Jerry Sags), when he distracted the referee, allowing Sags to knock out Neidhart with his motorcycle helmet. Hart and Neidhart again split up, though they reunited for a title rematch with The Nasty Boys on the July 29 Prime Time Wrestling, losing by disqualification when Bret hit both champions with a helmet, again introduced by Jimmy Hart. Neidhart also commentated on Wrestling Challenge alongside Gorilla Monsoon and Bobby Heenan from March until August 1991.

New Foundation (1991–1992)
Neidhart returned to WWF television on the November 9, 1991 episode of Superstars of Wrestling, donning new parachute pants with checkerboard designs. He suffered a loss to Ric Flair, who continued to apply his figure-four leglock after winning the match. While hobbling away to the back, Neidhart was attacked and further injured by the Beverly Brothers. This resulted in him being replaced in the 1991 Survivor Series by Sgt. Slaughter.

Neidhart returned once more on the December 1, 1991 episode of Wrestling Challenge, teaming with Owen Hart (Bret's younger brother) as the New Foundation, defeating the Executioners (Executioner #1 and Executioner #2). The New Foundation's highlight was a win over the Orient Express (Kato and Tanaka) at the January 1992 Royal Rumble. The team also had matches with the Beverly Brothers, the Nasty Boys, the Natural Disasters, and the Powers of Pain throughout late-1991 and early-1992, but had little success overall. The New Foundation wrestled their final match on February 15, 1992; Neidhart was fired the next day after refusing to take a drug test and throwing a television monitor backstage.

Various promotions (1992–1994)
After leaving the WWF in February 1992, Neidhart wrestled a handful of matches on the independent circuit, including two bouts for Eastern Championship Wrestling (ECW). Beginning in August 1992, he made three tours with New Japan Pro-Wrestling: The G1 Climax in August (losing in the first round to Kensuke Sasaki), the Super Grade Tag League II in October (teaming with Tom Zenk and finishing with 0 points) and Battle Final in December.

In February and March 1993, Neidhart wrestled in Australia for the "Wrestling Down Under" promotion, working three matches with Jake Roberts. In April 1993, Neidhart began wrestling for World Championship Wrestling (WCW), making his debut on the May 15 episode of WCW Worldwide, beating a jobber, Todd Zane. After defeating Mustapha Saed on the next episode, Neidhart teamed with Junkyard Dog for the next, again beating Chick Donovan and Rip Rogers. Neidhart and The Junkyard Dog beat Paul Orndorff and Dick Slater by disqualification on the June 5 WCW Saturday Night. Eleven days later, he beat Shanghai Pierce in a dark match before Clash of the Champions XXIII. After losing to Maxx Payne at a house show in Kokomo, Indiana, on October 7, Neidhart left WCW. On November 13, 1993, Neidhart wrestled The Sandman to a no contest at ECW's November to Remember in the ECW Arena. In December 1993, Neidhart promoted several shows in Florida under the banner "Anvil Promotions".

Throughout early 1994, Neidhart wrestled for various independent promotions. He returned to the World Wrestling Federation in June 1994.

World Wrestling Federation (1994)
Neidhart returned to the WWF at King of the Ring in 1994 as Bret Hart's cornerman for his WWF World Heavyweight Championship match defense against Intercontinental Champion Diesel. After Diesel hit Hart with his Jackknife finisher, Neidhart interfered to prevent the pin, and disqualifying Hart, but allowing him to retain the title. After the match, Diesel and Shawn Michaels beat down Hart, and Neidhart didn't intervene. Later that night, Neidhart reappeared at ringside again during Owen Hart's King of the Ring tournament final against Razor Ramon. He attacked Razor outside the ring, behind the referee's back, before Neidhart throwing Razor back for Hart to elbow drop and pin to become "The King of Harts", turning heel for the first time since 1988. Owen had been feuding with Bret since the Royal Rumble. Neidhart, believing Bret had held Owen back from his potential, sided with Owen, and usually cornering him in matches through the summer. Neidhart claimed he'd only helped Bret keep the WWF World Heavyweight Championship at King of the Ring so Owen could take it from him. This opportunity came in a steel cage match at SummerSlam. Neidhart sat in the third row during the match, behind other Hart family members. After Bret won the match, Neidhart entered the cage, locked it and helped Owen beat him down, while the Hart family members tried to climb over it and save him. Following SummerSlam, Neidhart teamed with Owen to face Bret and Randy Savage/The British Bulldog in a series of tag team bouts.

Neidhart joined Owen on Shawn Michaels' team, The Teamsters, to face Razor Ramon and The Bad Guys in an elimination match at Survivor Series. After they eliminated every Bad Guy except Razor, after Michaels inadvertently hit Diesel with the Sweet Chin Music. This caused an argument and the tag team partners split up, before Diesel chased Michaels down the aisle. As the other Teamsters tried to intervene, and all were counted out. Because Diesel and Michaels were WWF Tag Team Champions when they split, the title was vacated and a tournament held. Neidhart and Hart lost to The New Headshrinkers (Fatu and Sionne) in the first round on the December 31 Superstars, by disqualification. By the time it aired, Neidhart had left the WWF. Bret Hart wrote in his autobiography that the original plan was for Owen and Neidhart to win the tournament and the WWF Tag Team Championships, but Neidhart was officially fired due to no-showing events. Hart wound up winning the WWF Tag Team Championship at WrestleMania XI with new partner Yokozuna.

Various promotions (1995–1996)
After leaving the WWF once again, Neidhart returned to the ring in February 1995 for the Mid-Eastern Wrestling Federation (MEWF). Over the following months, he wrestled for various independent promotions. In April 1995, he returned to ECW, losing to Marty Jannetty and Ron Simmons on consecutive nights. After several more matches on the independent circuit, in July 1995 Neidhart made a one-night appearance with the Catch Wrestling Association in Graz, Austria, competing in the Euro Catch Festival. Later that month, Neidhart appeared with ECW once more, wrestling Marty Jannetty to a double disqualification. Over the following few months, he continued to wrestle on the independent circuit, briefly holding the MEWF Heavyweight Championship. In November and December 1995, Neidhart worked for the Catch Wrestling Association in Germany, competing in the CWA International Catch Cup tournament.

Neidhart wrestled sporadically throughout early-1996, including appearing at the World Wrestling Peace Festival in June 1996. He returned to the World Wrestling Federation later that month.

After leaving the WWF once more, in October 1996 Neidhart wrestling in England for Hammerlock Wrestling. In December 1996, he began appearing with the New York-based independent promotion Ultimate Championship Wrestling. In March 1997, he appeared with the Sacramento, California-based National Wrestling Conference.

Who (1996)
On the July 6, 1996, episode of Superstars, Neidhart returned to the WWF as the masked heel "Who", a gimmick designed for commentators Vince McMahon and Jerry Lawler to make "Who's on First?"-style jokes during his matches (most of which he lost). Who last appeared on TV in the "Bikini Beach Blast-Off" party on the SummerSlam pre-show. His last match was a win over Alex Porteau in Miami on September 12.

Hart Foundation reunion (1997)
Neidhart returned to the WWF once more on the April 28, 1997, episode of Raw is War, attacking Stone Cold Steve Austin and reuniting with Bret and Owen Hart as part of the new Hart Foundation, a stable of Canadian sympathizers, also including Davey Boy Smith and Brian Pillman. On July 6 at In Your House 16: Canadian Stampede in Bret's hometown Calgary, The Hart Foundation defeated the American team of Stone Cold Steve Austin, Ken Shamrock, Goldust and The Legion of Doom. Neidhart was part of Team Canada at Survivor Series in Montreal, teaming with The British Bulldog, Doug Furnas and Philip Lafon defeated Team USA Vader, Goldust, "Marvelous" Marc Mero and the debut of "The Lethal Weapon" Steve Blackman (Bulldog was the sole survivor, Neidhart was pinned by Vader).

After Bret and Davey Boy Smith left the WWF on bad terms because of the Montreal Screwjob at Survivor Series. D-Generation X (DX) leader and WWF Champion Shawn Michaels offered Neidhart a spot in the group on the November 24 episode of Raw Is War. Neidhart accepted, only for it to be revealed as a setup as the group assaulted Neidhart at the end of the show. The following week on the December 1 episode of Raw is War, DX member Triple H defeated Neidhart. After the match, DX attacked Neidhart once again and spray-painted "WCW" on his back and signifying him following Bret Hart to World Championship Wrestling. Sgt. Slaughter and Ken Shamrock saved him, before Slaughter and Shamrock attacked D-Generation X at the end of the show. His last match in WWF was when he defeated The Sultan at a house show on December 1. WWF announced that Neidhart was released from his WWF contract on December 2, 1997.

World Championship Wrestling (1998)
Neidhart returned to World Championship Wrestling on the January 12, 1998 episode of WCW Monday Nitro. The week prior, Ric Flair had given an interview in which he claimed to be a better wrestler than Bret Hart. After Neidhart rejected Flair's claim during an interview with Gene Okerlund, Flair attacked Neidhart, hitting him with a pair of brass knuckles and then applying a ringpost figure-four leglock to Neidhart until being driven off by Bret Hart.

Neidhart wrestled his first return match for WCW on the January 20, 1998 episode of WCW Saturday Night, defeating Wayne Bloom. In February 1998, Neidhart formed a tag team with the British Bulldog, who had also departed the WWF following the Montreal Screwjob. Neidhart and British Bulldog wrestled primarily on WCW Saturday Night and WCW Thunder, facing tag teams such as The Public Enemy, The Destruction Crew, High Voltage, nWo Japan, Sting and Lex Luger, and Brian Adams and Curt Hennig. In September 1998 at Fall Brawl '98: War Games, Neidhart and the British Bulldog defeated The Dancing Fools in a tag team match.

Neidhart's final televised match for WCW was on the September 26, 1998 episode of WCW Saturday Night where he and the British Bulldog lost to Stevie Ray and Vincent. Neidhart went on to wrestle on house shows until being released from WCW in October 1998.

Late career (1998–2016)
Following his departure from WCW, Neidhart largely retired from the ring, but continued to make sporadic appearances in independent shows. Notably, he was booked as Jake Roberts' singles opponent in the ill-fated Heroes of Wrestling event in October 1999. In 2000, he wrestled for a few appearances for Memphis Championship Wrestling. From 2000 to 2003 he wrestled in Canada for Elite Canadian Championship Wrestling, and Border City Wrestling. On January 17, 2003, he lost to Jim Duggan at Border City's main event at Algonquin College in Ottawa, Canada. On September 23, 2006, he defeated Norman Smiley at the UXW Florida Debut show in Orlando. he appeared in TNA on the November 12, 2009, episode of Impact! winning against Jay Lethal in his initial open challenge thrown out to the legends of professional wrestling.

On Raw XV, the 15th-anniversary WWE Raw special on December 10, 2007, Neidhart returned to WWE for the first time since 1997, and participated in the 15th Anniversary Battle Royal, eventually making it to the final five before being eliminated by Skinner.

Neidhart's last known match was on March 5, 2016, when he teamed with Koko B. Ware and Frankie the Pizza Guy as they defeated Nikolai Volkoff, Clay Dasher and Shawn Andrews at a BCW event in Williamsport, Pennsylvania.

Professional wrestling style and persona
Neidhart usually wrestled in pink attire and the Hart Foundation tag team was nicknamed "The Pink and Black Attack". It popularized the Hart Attack finisher maneuver.

Other media
On April 6, 2010, WWE released Hart & Soul: The Hart Family Anthology on DVD, which is a three-disc set featuring a documentary on the Hart wrestling family (including Neidhart) as well as 12 matches. Neidhart's daughter Natalie was featured as a main cast member on the reality show Total Divas, and he made appearances on the show along with his wife.

Personal life
Neidhart and wife, Ellie Hart had three daughters; one, Natalie Neidhart-Wilson, is a professional wrestler under the ring name "Natalya", currently signed to WWE.

Neidhart was arrested on September 6, 2010, and charged with two counts of possession of controlled substances with intent to distribute, two counts of trafficking illegal drugs, one count of burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, and one count of third-degree grand theft for property stolen between $300 and $5,000. He was arrested after becoming aggressive with police after ingesting multiple pills outside a gas station. In March 2012, he was sentenced to five months and 29 days in jail. During his sentencing, he was arrested and held in contempt of court. Neidhart completed two stints in rehabilitation paid for by WWE.

Death
According to TMZ, Neidhart's wife Elizabeth told investigators that on August 13, 2018, he was having problems sleeping and got out of bed to adjust the thermostat. As he went to touch it, he "turned weirdly as if he were about to dance", then fell against the wall and floor. She immediately dialed 911, believing he was having a seizure, something for which he took medication. He had a four-inch long gash on his face when emergency services arrived. He died at the scene at age 63, with the Pasco County Sheriff's Office stating to TMZ that their preliminary investigation believed he hit his head and succumbed due to his injuries, with foul play not being suspected. At the time, his wife stated his doctors believed he may have had Alzheimer's disease. WWE later paid tribute to Neidhart on their website.

Championships and accomplishments

 * Championship Wrestling from Florida
 * NWA Southern Heavyweight Championship (Florida version) (1 time)
 * NWA United States Tag Team Championship (Florida version) (1 time) – with Krusher Khruschev
 * Canadian Pro-Wrestling Hall of Fame
 * Class of 2022 – as a member of the Hart Foundation
 * Legends Pro Wrestling
 * Hall of Fame (2011)
 * Memphis Championship Wrestling
 * MCW Southern Tag Team Championship (1 time) – with The Blue Meanie
 * Memphis Wrestling Hall of Fame
 * Class of 2022
 * Mid-Eastern Wrestling Federation
 * MEWF Heavyweight Championship (1 time)
 * Mid-South Wrestling
 * Mid-South Tag Team Championship (1 time) – with Butch Reed
 * New England Pro Wrestling Hall of Fame
 * Class of 2014
 * Professional Wrestling Federation
 * PWF Heavyweight Championship (1 time)
 * Pro Wrestling Illustrated
 * Ranked No. 61 of the top 500 singles wrestlers in the PWI 500 in 1994
 * Ranked No. 189 of the top 500 singles wrestlers of the PWI Years in 2003
 * Ranked No. 37 of the top 100 tag teams of the PWI Years with Bret Hart in 2003
 * Pro Wrestling Ohio
 * PWO Tag Team Championship (1 time) – with Greg Valentine
 * Stampede Wrestling
 * Stampede International Tag Team Championship (2 times) – with Hercules Ayala (1) and Mr. Hito (1)
 * Stampede Wrestling Hall of Fame (Class of 1995)
 * Top Rope Championship Wrestling
 * TRCW International Heavyweight Championship (1 time)
 * Universal Wrestling Alliance
 * UWA Heavyweight Championship (1 time)
 * World Wrestling Federation/WWE
 * WWF Tag Team Championship (2 times) – with Bret Hart
 * WWE Hall of Fame (Class of 2019) - as a member of The Hart Foundation
 * Wrestling Observer Newsletter
 * Feud of the Year (1997) with The Hart Foundation vs. Stone Cold Steve Austin
 * Canadian Wrestling Hall of Fame
 * Individually
 * With the Hart family

title: Jim Neidhart


text:
HMS A5

HMS A5 was an early Royal Navy submarine. She was a member of Group Two of the first British A-class submarine (1903) of submarines. Like all members of her class, she was built at Vickers Barrow-in-Furness.

Design and construction
The A-class was designed by Vickers as an improvement on the previous American designed Holland-class submarines, and were the first class of British-designed submarines. Four submarines, HMS A1–HMS A4, were ordered as part of the 1902–1903 construction programme for the Royal Navy, with a further nine (A5–HMS A13) ordered under the 1903–1904 programme. The design of the submarines was revised between the prototype boat, A1, and the other three submarines of the first order, and again for the submarines of the 1903–04 programme, with this batch being fitted with a second torpedo tube.

A5 was 105 ft long overall, with a beam of 12 ft and a draught of 10 ft when surfaced. Displacement was about 190 LT surfaced and 205–207 LT submerged. A 550 hp 16-cylinder Wolsey petrol engine powered the submarine on the surface, driving the submarine's single propeller shaft, while submerged propulsion was via a 150 hp electric motor, giving a speed of 11.5 kn on the surface and 7 kn dived. Armament was two 18 inch (45.7 cm) torpedo tubes in the ship's bow. Four torpedoes were carried.

A5 was laid down at Vicker's Barrow-in-Furness shipyard in 1903, was launched on 3 March 1904 and completed on 11 February 1905.

Service history
Immediately after commissioning she and her tender HMS Hazard (1894) travelled to Queenstown, (now Cobh) Ireland. On 16 February 1905 at 10:05 whilst tied up alongside Hazard an explosion occurred on board, with a second explosion about 30 minutes later. Five of the crew were killed by the explosion. The captain, Lieutenant H J G Good, and the other four crew members survived.

An enquiry into the accident concluded that petrol fumes had been ignited by an electrical spark, with the second explosion caused by smouldering debris from the first event.

She was returned to Barrow-in-Furness the following month for repairs and returned to service in the Home Fleet in October. She was used for training until paid off for disposal in December 1915 and was finally broken up in Portsmouth in 1920.

Memorial
The Irish Naval Service donated a granite block with a brass plaque giving details of the A5 tragedy, and this was unveiled in March 2000.

On 13 February 2005 there was a ceremony to mark the centenary of the accident. LÉ Eithne of the Irish Naval Service and HMS Richmond (F239) of the Royal Navy visited Cobh for the occasion.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: HMS A5


text: User talk:68.7.84.210

title: User talk:68.7.84.210


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Nazarian

Hoax article. No Google hits for "Daniel Nazarian" "The Liberty of the Fleet". No Google hits for "Hans Nazarian". No Imdb entry for this supposed actor. The photo is obviously not from 1899. Also the Fleet Prison was closed before he was supposedly born. The creator has shown himself in other places to be a troll. And delete Image:Actor-dmnazarian.jpg, as well. RickK 21:58, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: 1. "performed in over fifty plays during his three years at university" is impossible. 2. "paid him a gratuity of 10 Pounds 3 Shillings. Nazarian used the money to finance a 3 week production of "The Liberty of the Fleet"' is also impossible. 3. The photo has fashions from the 1930's on and has modern film and so is not 1899.  4. He would have been 74 at his death, and yet he is supposed to have died in an accidental tram incident.  5. "Daniel Nazarian" is showing up in other Wikipedia articles.  However see this for evidence of a London anonymous person writing the story/myth in a guest book.  This is not proof, as it has no fact check and is a voluntary piece of information.  Now, is this one of our mirrors?  I think this is a spoof, but I urge anyone (RickK, interested?) to search our articles thoroughly for places where this information might have been slipped in. Geogre 22:24, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, WordIQ is one of our mirrors. I just deleted the Daniel Nazarian entry from our version of that article, as well as the pages for his supposed birth and death dates, and List of male actors, or something like that.  It's also highly unlikely he would have a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame without an entry in IMDb.  RickK 22:45, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * I just went to http://www.hollywoodchamber.net/, the Hollywood Walk of Fame official website, and there is no Daniel Nazarian listed as having a star. RickK 22:50, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * And in the "It's right in front of my nose" category, there are two spellings: Nazarian and Nazarrian. Geogre 17:49, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Decumanus 22:47, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacrimosus 01:58, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fabrication. Andris 08:14, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)
 * If this is patent nonsense, isn't it a speedy delete? Average Earthman 12:21, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: An apparent hoax is not patent nonsense according to the specific cases for speedy deletion. Several articles that were thought to be hoaxes have turned out to be true and were rescued by the VfD process. Not that that seems to apply here, but I'm still on my campaign against the misuse of speedy deletes. Rossami 16:58, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. But not speedy. DJ Clayworth 19:44, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. PBTim 18:47, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)


text:
Emund Eriksson

Emund Eriksson (?-c. 970), (English: Edmund), was a Swedish king whose historicity is only known from a single source, the Gesta Hammaburgensis ecclesiae pontificum which was written by Adam of Bremen in c. 1075.

Reign
According to Adam of Bremen, a certain King Ring ruled the Swedes together with his sons Erik and Emund in about 936. In a later chapter, Adam mentions Emund Eriksson as ruling Sweden some time in the second half of the 10th century. He was presumably the son of Erik Ringsson. Adam relates that Emund was king at the same time as King Harald Bluetooth of Denmark (c. 958/64-985) expanded his power overseas and subdued Norway (in about 970). Emund was an ally of Harald, and showed a friendly attitude to Christian people who came to him. That German missionary efforts were renewed about this time is related by Adam in the following chapter. The Archbishop of Hamburg-Bremen, Adaldag (937-988), appointed a Dane called Odinkar the Elder for the Swedish lands. Being a pious man of noble stock, he could "easily convince the wild peoples about everything concerning our religion".

Dynastic position
Emund Eriksson is not known to the later Norse sagas and king-lists. Information about him may have come from Adam's interview with the Danish King Sweyn Estridsen, Harald Bluetooth's great-grandson. To the extent that he is historical, he may have ruled in the third quarter of the 10th century. The next Swedish king mentioned by Adam of Bremen is Eric the Victorious (died c. 995), but he does not tell how they were related. It has even been speculated that Eric the Victorious belonged to a Geatic clan which gained power in the Mälaren Valley and founded Sigtuna in c. 980. Nevertheless, the name Emund was common in the late Viking Age dynasty of Sweden, but extremely rare outside of it, which suggests a dynastic continuity. An option is that Emund Eriksson was the brother of Björn (III) Eriksson, who the Norse sagas name as the son of Eric Anundsson and the father of Eric the Victorious. This would have been in accordance with the Germanic system of co-rulership (Diarchy) in which two brothers were elected kings and which, according to the sagas, was sometimes used by the Swedes. If this is the case, several generations of Swedish rulers were conflated by tradition, explaining the differences between Adam of Bremen and the Norse sagas.

title: Emund Eriksson


text:
Jean-Claude Germain

Jean-Claude Germain (born 18 June 1939 in Montreal) is a Canadian playwright, author, journalist and historian.

He contributed to Le Petit Journal, to Victor-Lévy Beaulieu's Dimensions magazine and to Maclean's Magazine, and has been the senior editor to Le Québec littéraire. He writes a monthly column in l'aut'journal.

In 1969 he founded the company Le Théâtre du Même Nom which became the Théâtre d'Aujourd'hui of which he became the director in 1972. He has also taught at the National Theatre School of Canada.

Published works

 * Le roi des mises à bas prix (1972)
 * Diguidi, diguidi, ha! ha! ha! Si les Sansoucis s'en soucient, ces Sansoucis-ci s'en soucieront-ils? Bien parler, c'est se respecter! (1972)
 * Les tourtereaux : ou, La vieillesse frappe à l'aube (1974)
 * Les sportifs et le droit (1975)
 * Les hauts et les bas de la vie d' une diva Sarah Ménard par aux-mêmes : une monologuerie bouffe (1976)
 * Un pays dont la devise est je m'oublie : théâtre (1976)
 * Les faux brillants de Félix-Gabriel Marchand : paraphrase (1977)
 * Seguro dos desportistas contra os riscos de acidentes (1978)
 * L'école des rêves : théâtre (1979)
 * Mamours et conjugat : scènes de la vie amoureuse québécoise : théâtre (1979)
 * Les nuits de l'Indiva : une mascapade (1983)
 * A Canadian play/une plaie canadienne : théâtre (1983)
 * Le Feuilleton de Montréal (1994)
 * Le miroir aux tartuffes : un charivari québécois : théâtre (1998)
 * De tous les plaisirs, lire est le plus fou (2001)
 * Rue Fabre, centre de l'univers : historiettes de mon jeune âge (2007)

Awards

 * 2001: Order of La Pléiade

title: Jean-Claude Germain


text:
HMS A6

HMS A6 was an A-class submarine (1903) submarine built for the Royal Navy in the first decade of the 20th century.

Design and description
A6 was a member of the first British class of submarines, although slightly larger, faster and more heavily armed than the lead ship, HMS A1. The submarine had a length of 105 ft overall, a beam of 12 ft and a mean draft of 10 ft. They displaced 190 LT on the surface and 206 LT submerged. The A-class submarines had a crew of 2 officers and 9 ratings.

For surface running, the boats were powered by a single 16-cylinder 550 bhp Wolseley petrol engine that drove one propeller shaft. When submerged the propeller was driven by a 150 hp electric motor. They could reach 11 kn on the surface and 7 kn underwater. On the surface, A6 had a range of 500 nmi at 10 kn; submerged the boat had a range of 30 nmi at 5 kn.

The boats were armed with two 18-inch (45 cm) torpedo tubes in the bow. They could carry a pair of reload torpedoes, but generally did not as doing so that they had to compensate for their weight by an equivalent weight of fuel.

Construction and career
A6 was ordered as part of the 1903–04 Naval Programme from at Vickers. She was laid down at the shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness on 1 September 1903, launched on 3 March 1904 and completed on 23 March 1905.

A6 ran aground on a sandbank in Sandown harbour on 31 July 1906, but received little damage.

title: HMS A6


text:
Talk:Computer data storage/to do

 * Merge most if not all of the offshoot articles and stubs and redirect here:
 * Memory (computers) - Now redirects here
 * Physical memory (?)

 * These should probably remain separate articles, but need a lot of fleshing out:
 * Data storage device
 * Main storage
 * Primary storage
 * Secondary storage
 * Tertiary storage

 * Restructure according to the guidelines proposed in WikiProject Science, ie. :
 * expand the introduction for the general public
 * explain the applications in light of everyday life: where one can find it, and in what shapes; discuss the economics (speed vs capacity vs features); discuss the rate of technical improvements
 * theory: explain that computer = processor + storage, highlighting its fundamental importance

To the first statement, all articles should be kept seperate, with a link and a quick brief of about 2 lines next to the link from this page. the reason for this is if any students (like me) search for something and get re-directed here, it may cause confusion about what exactly the different types of storage are. sorry that this is in a previously existing section, i'm not sure how to make a new one. can somone please move it into one? thank you.84.92.142.211 19:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:Computer data storage/to do


text:
HMS A13

HMS A13 was an A-class submarine (1903) submarine built for the Royal Navy in the first decade of the 20th century. She was the first British submarine not to use a petrol engine. After surviving World War I, she was sold for scrap in 1920.

Design and description
A13 was a member of the first British class of submarines, although slightly larger, faster and more heavily armed than the lead ship, HMS A1. The submarine had a length of 105 ft overall, a beam of 12 ft and a mean draft of 10 ft. They displaced 190 LT on the surface and 206 LT submerged. The A-class submarines had a crew of 2 officers and 9 ratings.

For surface running, A13 was powered by a single vertical, six-cylinder 500 bhp Hornsby-Akroyd oil engine that drove one propeller shaft. When submerged the propeller was driven by a 150 hp electric motor. They could reach 11 kn on the surface and 6 kn underwater. The heavy oil engine was 3 LT heavier than the petrol engines used by the other boats in the class and an equal amount of fuel had to be removed, which reduced their range despite the heavy oil engine's more economical consumption. On the surface, the boat had a range of about 400 nmi at 10 kn; submerged the boat had a range of 30 nmi at 5 kn.

The boats were armed with two 18-inch (45 cm) torpedo tubes in the bow. They could carry a pair of reload torpedoes, but generally did not as doing so that they had to compensate for their weight by an equivalent weight of fuel.

Construction and career
A13 was ordered as part of the 1903–04 Naval Programme from at Vickers. She was laid down at the shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness in 1903, launched on 8 February 1905 and completed on 8 May 1905. The boat was broken up in 1920.

title: HMS A13


text:
HMS A12

HMS A12 was an A-class submarine (1903) submarine built for the Royal Navy in the first decade of the 20th century. After surviving World War I, she was sold for scrap in 1920.

Design and description
A12 was a member of the first British class of submarines, although slightly larger, faster and more heavily armed than the lead ship, HMS A1. The submarine had a length of 105 ft overall, a beam of 12 ft and a mean draft of 10 ft. They displaced 190 LT on the surface and 206 LT submerged. The A-class submarines had a crew of 2 officers and 9 ratings.

For surface running, the boats were powered by a single 16-cylinder 600 bhp Wolseley petrol engine that drove one propeller shaft. When submerged the propeller was driven by a 150 hp electric motor. They could reach 11 kn on the surface and 6 kn underwater. On the surface, A12 had a range of 500 nmi at 10 kn; submerged the boat had a range of 30 nmi at 5 kn.

The boats were armed with two 18-inch (45 cm) torpedo tubes in the bow. They could carry a pair of reload torpedoes, but generally did not as they would have to remove an equal weight of fuel in compensation.

Construction and career
A12 was ordered as part of the 1903–04 Naval Programme from at Vickers. She was laid down at the shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness in 1903, launched on 3 March 1905 and completed on 23 September.

title: HMS A12


text:
HMS A11

HMS A11 was an A-class submarine (1903) submarine built for the Royal Navy in the first decade of the 20th century. After surviving World War I, she was sold for scrap in 1920.

Design and description
A11 was a member of the first British class of submarines, although slightly larger, faster and more heavily armed than the lead ship, HMS A1. The submarine had a length of 105 ft overall, a beam of 12 ft and a mean draft of 10 ft. They displaced 190 LT on the surface and 206 LT submerged. The A-class submarines had a crew of 2 officers and 9 ratings.

For surface running, the boats were powered by a single 16-cylinder 600 bhp Wolseley petrol engine that drove one propeller shaft. When submerged the propeller was driven by a 150 hp electric motor. They could reach 11 kn on the surface and 6 kn underwater. On the surface, A11 had a range of 500 nmi at 10 kn; submerged the boat had a range of 30 nmi at 5 kn.

The boats were armed with two 18-inch (45 cm) torpedo tubes in the bow. They could carry a pair of reload torpedoes, but generally did not as doing so that they had to compensate for their weight by removing an equal weight of fuel.

Construction and career
A11 was ordered as part of the 1903–04 Naval Programme from Vickers. She was laid down at their shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness in 1903, launched on 8 March 1905 and completed on 11 July 1905.

On 7 September 1910 A11 collided with a barge when leaving Portsmouth Harbour. The barge was sunk, although her two crew were rescued, and A11's bow was slightly damaged. In February 1913, A11 was one of three submarines based at Lamlash on the Isle of Arran off the west coast of Scotland.

title: HMS A11


text:
HMS A10

HMS A10 was an A-class submarine (1903) submarine built for the Royal Navy in the first decade of the 20th century. After surviving World War I, she was sold for scrap in 1919.

Design and description
A10 was a member of the first British class of submarines, although slightly larger, faster and more heavily armed than the lead ship, HMS A1. The submarine had a length of 105 ft overall, a beam of 12 ft and a mean draft of 10 ft. They displaced 190 LT on the surface and 206 LT submerged. The A-class submarines had a crew of 2 officers and 9 ratings.

For surface running, the boats were powered by a single 16-cylinder 600 bhp Wolseley petrol engine that drove one propeller shaft. When submerged the propeller was driven by a 150 hp electric motor. They could reach 11 kn on the surface and 6 kn underwater. On the surface, A10 had a range of 500 nmi at 10 kn; submerged the boat had a range of 30 nmi at 5 kn.

The boats were armed with two 18-inch (45 cm) torpedo tubes in the bow. They could carry a pair of reload torpedoes, but generally did not as their weight had to be compensated for by an equivalent weight of fuel.

Construction and career
A10 was ordered as part of the 1903–04 Naval Programme from Vickers. She was laid down at their shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness in 1903, launched on 8 February 1905 and completed on 3 June 1905. She collided with the battleship HMS Empress of India in Plymouth Sound on 30 April 1906.

A10 was sold for scrap to the Ardrossan Drydock Company of Ardrossan, Scotland, on 1 April 1919.

title: HMS A10


text:
Parkland Memorial Hospital

Parkland Memorial Hospital is a public hospital located in Dallas, Texas. It is the main hospital of the Parkland Health & Hospital System and serves as Dallas County's public hospital. It is located within the Southwestern Medical District. The hospital is staffed by the faculty, residents, and medical students of UT Southwestern Medical Center.

Original campus
The original hospital opened on May 19, 1894, in a wooden building on a 17 acre meadow located at Oak Lawn and Maple avenues. The name Parkland came from the land on which the hospital was built, originally purchased by the city as a park. A brick building (the first hospital brick building erected in Texas, now owned by Crow Holdings) replaced the wooden facility in 1913. All services from the campus at Maple Avenue were decommissioned in 1974.

1954–2015 campus
In 1954, Parkland moved to 5201 Harry Hines Boulevard, about a mile from its original site. Its renal dialysis unit opened in 1955, the burns unit in 1961, and the cardiac intensive care unit in 1969. The new Parkland tower blocks were redeveloped in 1981, and the triangular wing at the hospital's entrance on Harry Hines Boulevard opened in the late 1980s.

The former hospital site at 5201 Harry Hines Boulevard is set for demolition in 2022–24, after closing on July 11, 2022.

John F. Kennedy assassination
Parkland Hospital is best known as the hospital where three individuals associated with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy either died or were pronounced dead: President Kennedy himself; his assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; and Jack Ruby, who later killed Oswald. The 2013 film Parkland dramatizes the deaths of Kennedy and Oswald in the hospital.

After he was shot on November 22, 1963, President Kennedy was rushed to Parkland, where he was pronounced dead at 1:00 p.m. in Trauma Room 1, thirty minutes after he was shot at Dealey Plaza. At the same time, Texas governor John Connally, wounded in the same shooting, was treated in Trauma Room 2, and survived. Two days after the assassination, November 24, Oswald was rushed to Parkland after being shot in the abdomen by Ruby and died in operating room #5 after over ninety minutes of surgery. Ruby died on January 3, 1967, in the same emergency department, from a pulmonary embolism associated with lung cancer.

Since Ruby's death in 1967, areas in the Old Parkland Hospital where Kennedy was pronounced dead and Oswald was operated on had been remodeled. A plaque there marked the location where Trauma Room 1 was previously in the prior Parkland, and then became a corridor in the hospital's radiology department. The ambulance entry remained in roughly the same location. The site of Trauma Room 1 was renovated several times since 1963. Trauma Room 1 was dismantled for renovation in 1973; all building materials and equipment from the room were retained by the government and remain in archival storage today. Parkland's JFK history is noted on a wall at the new hospital and at the John F. Kennedy Park for Hope, Healing and Heroes memorial on campus.

New campus
Parkland's high volume of patients led to the decision by the Dallas County Commissioners Court to propose replacing the overcrowded, 50+-year-old building with a new 1700000 sqft, 17-story, 862-bed facility, along with a new 380000 sqft outpatient center, a 275000 sqft office facility, and parking for 6,000 cars. The total cost would be $1.27 billion, to be paid for through three avenues: 1) a $747 million bond proposition (contingent on voter approval, which was obtained in November 2008), 2) $350 million of cash from current and future operations, and 3) $150 million from private donations.

The board approved nearly $100 million in contracts and hired two architectural firms – HDR, Inc. (based in Omaha, Nebraska, but operates a large practice in Dallas) and Corgan (based in Dallas) – to design the new building. (A parking garage was completed as a design/build project by The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company and the architecture firm of Omniplan in January 2012.) In addition to Dallas County taxpayers funding the public hospital, large private donations were made as well, over the next five years; one major donation of $1 million was made by the Bank of America Charitable Foundation. Donors have their names permanently etched in glass panels in the two-story, glass atrium main lobby.

One major feature of the new facility is that movements of staff and supplies are handled in separate corridors and elevators from those used by patients and visitors.

The formal groundbreaking ceremony was held in October 2010; the facility was officially dedicated in March 2015, with all patients and staff officially occupying the facility that August. On August 20, 2015, Parkland opened a new emergency department and began accepting patients; construction had commenced in 2010. Staff members and patients were transferred throughout the next few days, from 5201 Harry Hines Boulevard to the new hospital located across the street at 5200 Harry Hines Boulevard. The new hospital welcomed its first birth, a boy delivered by Caesarean section, that same morning.

The new facility is immediately across Harry Hines Boulevard from the former hospital complex, and is served by the Southwestern Medical District/Parkland station of DART light rail, which opened in December 2010.

Awards and recognition
Parkland has been recognized by the American Hospital Association as one of the nation's Most Wired™ Hospitals for excellence in using technology to fill gaps in care and partner with patients on health. The hospital received this recognition 2014–2017 and 2020.

Parkland was awarded The Joint Commission's Gold Seal of Approval® and the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association's Heart-Check mark in 2017 for Advanced Certification for Comprehensive Stroke Centers.

In 2017, Parkland Health & Hospital System was recognized as a Top Performer in LGBT Healthcare Equality by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Foundation, the educational arm of the country's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization. Parkland earned top marks in meeting non-discrimination and training criteria that demonstrate its commitment to equitable, inclusive care for LGBT patients and their families.

Parkland's main campus is currently the largest ENERGY STAR® certified healthcare campus in the U.S., with over 3.1 million square feet of space recognized by this certification. In addition, the campus has six LEED Gold certified buildings, the first of which was awarded in 2013, that employ water reclamation, solar energy, and native landscaping. Parkland is also the second largest adopter of renewable energy in the Texas healthcare sector, earning the hospital recognition in the Environmental Protection Agency's Green Power Partnership.

Leadership
In May 2017, Fred Cerise, MD, MPH, president and CEO of Parkland Health & Hospital System was appointed by the U.S. Comptroller General to the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC). As a member of the commission, Dr. Cerise serves as a national advisor to Congress on issues affecting Medicaid and CHIP.

Parkland Trauma Department
In 2016, the staff of Parkland's Rees-Jones Trauma Center began an initiative to teach classes to the community members so that they can learn how to recognize life-threatening bleeding and administer appropriate medical treatment before professional rescuers arrive. Parkland "Stop the Bleed" classes have been adapted from courses including the U.S. Military's Tactical combat Casualty Care Guidelines and the Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) course and a part of a large, United States Government effort to make "Stop the Bleed" training the CPR of the 21st century.

The staff of Parkland Memorial Hospital's Emergency Department and Rees-Jones Trauma Center received the 2016 Texas Preparedness Leadership Award for "Outstanding Service in Response to the 2016 Dallas Police Shootings." The award was presented at the 2016 Preparedness Coalition Symposium held Oct. 12–14 in Galveston.

Capabilities
Parkland is the Dallas County public hospital; funds are primarily provided by a specially designated property tax on Dallas County residents.

Parkland serves as one of Dallas's five Level I Trauma Centers (alongside Baylor University Medical Center, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, and Children's Medical Center), a primary care center for Dallas County residents, and (along with UT Southwestern) as a medical and surgical referral center for North Texas and parts of Southern Oklahoma. Thus, virtually all medical and surgical subspecialties are represented—which makes Parkland a destination for post-graduate medical training. The Parkland Burn Center, one of the largest civilian burn units in the U.S., is famous for the Parkland Formula for fluid resuscitation, developed by Charles R. Baxter in the 1960s. The fame of the Parkland Formula is due to its being one of the first treatments for burn that included rehydration and electrolytic management.

Parkland ranks among the largest teaching hospitals in the nation. Texas Woman's University began its Bachelor of Science nursing program at Parkland in 1954 and it is still located within walking distance of the Parkland campus. Parkland also serves as the major teaching hospital of the adjacent University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

It has the distinction of delivering more infants under one roof than any other hospital in the nation, averaging 15–16,000 deliveries per year. Parkland Memorial has eleven prenatal clinics and employs 72 doctors training to become obstetricians-gynecologists and 45 nurse-midwives. In 2005, the staff delivered 15,590 babies, an average of more than 42 infants per day. Parkland created one of the first high-risk antenatal units in the nation and had the first neonatal intensive care unit in North Texas.

Parkland has approximately 240,000 emergency visits a year, for the co-located main emergency department (153,915 visits in 2013), and the urgent care unit (60,013 visits in 2013).

Parkland is also the base for Biotel, the medical direction system used by Dallas Fire-Rescue as well as fourteen other emergency medical service agencies in the Metroplex.

Hatcher Station Health Center
In May, 2014, a new 44,300-square-foot, Parkland Health & Hospital System-affiliated outpatient clinic near Fair Park began construction on a 7-acre site adjacent to DART's Hatcher Station. The $19.8 million clinic, which was designed by BOKA Powell for Frazier Revitalization Inc. and Parkland Health & Hospital System, serves geriatric and behavioral health patients, along with adults, women, children, and infants. It also provides on-site diagnostic imaging and lab services. Exam rooms feature flexible equipment setups, and an on-site conference facility accommodates education and wellness programs. The clinic, officially named Hatcher Station Health Center, opened on May 19, 2015.

title: Parkland Memorial Hospital


text:
HMS A9

HMS A9 was an A-class submarine (1903) submarine built for the Royal Navy in the first decade of the 20th century. After surviving World War I, she was sold for scrap in 1920.

Design and description
A9 was a member of the first British class of submarines, although slightly larger, faster and more heavily armed than the lead ship, HMS A1. The submarine had a length of 105 ft overall, a beam of 12 ft and a mean draft of 10 ft. They displaced 190 LT on the surface and 206 LT submerged. The A-class submarines had a crew of 2 officers and 9 ratings.

For surface running, the boats were powered by a single 16-cylinder 600 bhp Wolseley petrol engine that drove one propeller shaft. When submerged the propeller was driven by a 150 hp electric motor. They could reach 11 kn on the surface and 6 kn underwater. On the surface, A9 had a range of 500 nmi at 10 kn; submerged the boat had a range of 30 nmi at 5 kn.

The boats were armed with two 18-inch (45 cm) torpedo tubes in the bow. They could carry a pair of reload torpedoes, but generally did not as doing so that they had to compensate for their weight by an equivalent weight of fuel.

Construction and career
A9 was ordered as part of the 1903–04 Naval Programme from at Vickers. She was laid down at the shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness in 1903, launched on 8 February 1905 and completed on 8 May 1905.

title: HMS A9


text:
HMS A8

HMS A8 was an early Royal Navy submarine.

She was a member of Group Two of the 1903 British A-class of submarines. Like the other members of her class, she was built at Vickers Barrow-in-Furness.

She sank with the loss of 15 crew as a result of an accident whilst running on the surface in Plymouth Sound on 8 June 1905. A sudden dip in the bow caused the submarine to be swamped through the hatch in the conning tower. Only 4 survived. She was salvaged four days after the accident at which point a loose rivet was found in the bow plating. The submarine was then repaired and recommissioned and used for training during the First World War along with A9 as part of the First Submarine Flotilla, operating near Devonport through early 1916. She was scrapped in October 1920 at Dartmouth.

title: HMS A8


text:
HMS A7

HMS A7 was an A-class submarine (1903) submarine built for the Royal Navy in the first decade of the 20th century. She sank in a training accident in 1914 with the loss of her entire crew. Efforts to salvage her failed and her wreck is a protected site. Diving on her is prohibited without a licence from the Ministry of Defence.

Design and description
A7 was a member of the first British class of submarines, although slightly larger, faster and more heavily armed than the lead ship, HMS A1. The submarine had a length of 105 ft overall, a beam of 12 ft and a mean draft of 10 ft. They displaced 190 LT on the surface and 206 LT submerged. The A-class submarines had a crew of 2 officers and 9 ratings.

For surface running, the boats were powered by a single 16-cylinder 550 bhp Wolseley petrol engine that drove one propeller shaft. When submerged the propeller was driven by a 150 hp electric motor. They could reach 11 kn on the surface and 7 kn underwater. On the surface, A7 had a range of 500 nmi at 10 kn; submerged the boat had a range of 30 nmi at 5 kn.

The boats were armed with two 18-inch (45 cm) torpedo tubes in the bow. They could carry a pair of reload torpedoes, but generally did not as doing so that they had to compensate for their weight by an equivalent weight of fuel.

Construction and career
A7 was ordered as part of the 1903–04 Naval Programme from at Vickers. She was laid down at their shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness on 1 September 1903, launched on 21 January 1905 and completed on 13 April. She sank in Whitsand Bay, Cornwall on 16 January 1914 with the loss of her crew whilst carrying out dummy torpedo attacks on HMS Pygmy in conjunction with submarine HMS A9. A disturbance in the water was seen which thought to be caused by the crew of A7 attempting to blow water from her ballast tanks in a desperate attempt to reach the surface. The location was marked with a buoy and Pygmy returned to Plymouth Sound to report on the disaster. Pygmy returned to the site in the afternoon but was unable to locate the buoy as the weather had deteriorated. It then took five days to relocate the submarine, she was found in 121 ft depth with 20 ft of her stern buried in the muddy seabed and with her bow 33 ft off the bottom, raised at an angle of 30°. Several attempts were made to salvage her over the next month by attaching a hawser to the towing eye on the bow or wrapping steel hawsers around her hull, but her stern was too deeply embedded in the mud and the hawsers parted without pulling her out. She lies today where she sank, buried up to her waterline in a flat, mud seabed in about 121 ft of water. In 2001, she was declared as one of 16 wrecks in British waters designated as "Controlled Sites" under the Protection of Military Remains Act by the British Government and which cannot be dived without special permission.

In 2014 the SHIPS Project team in Plymouth completed an archaeological investigation of the A7 submarine, having been granted a licence by the UK Ministry of Defence.

title: HMS A7


text:
User talk:Renamed user CnELGrVopW

Page nuked on reaching 33KB, one of the browsers I use still barfs on pages this large. Its in the History still... --Kiand 18:44, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nuke again at 38KB, its all in the history. Archives make the user space messy, these discussions are all dead. --Kiand 00:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

And another massive block of them today, mostly the "Work Files". --Kiand 18:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Channel 9
WWOR/WOR was a nationally distributed in the US and Canada TV station. For the majority of the time it was refered to as "Channel 9" on air. You seem to be in Ireland, so how would you know about things in the US? The Matt Feldman Experience! 17:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't need to know, as in this case, its called WWOR-TV and not Channel 9. Indeed, its branded on-air as "my9", not "channel 9". Its standard to not list channels which call themselves as "Channel #" due to their VHF frequency - please look at Channel 2, Channel 3, Channel 4 (disambiguation), Channel 5, Channel 6 (disambiguation), Channel 7 and Channel 8. There seem not to be pages for any of the UHF frequencies at all, because clearly no channel is actually called "Channel 34" or similar. Many of the stations on those VHF frequencies are on cable or satellite outside their area (actually, I'd guess they're -all- on satellite by this stage), but none are listed. --Kiand 17:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You don't know and your lack of knowlege is astounding. Stick to topics you actually know about. WOR/WWOR is a very well known station in the United States and is refered to by many in the US as channel 9. The Matt Feldman Experience! 15:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Still irrelevant - its importance in the US is irrelevant to the fact that we list -no- channels who have a US callsign as their official name under the Channel # pages. If you wish to challenge this long-standing arrangment, its not me you do it to. --Kiand 15:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Channel 9
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TVXPert 03:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * TVXpert has left this message on my talk page too, after reverting one of his edits to the Channel 9 article. He obviously hasn't read WP:VAND...content disputes are not vandalism. Kirjtc2 04:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * And whaddya know, TVXPert and Matt Feldman were sockpuppets of each other. --Kiand 18:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

I have edited dozens of articles, and met only 3 weird guys. It seems that you give others a lot of troubles. Brian W 14:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't comment on things you know nothing about, its better in the long run. Might be an idea to take that in to account when it comes to the state of music used in clubs for the past while too. --Kiand 20:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Man, you work for the Sismi. It seems that you all haven't learnt yet the lesson of history. Brian W
 * I fail to see the relevance of this accusation to anything else here? --Kiand 18:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Song
I caught that song before you deleted it. Its a take on a Pink Floyd song, "Pigs (Three Different Ones)", from the album, Animals. Good song though the topic, Mary Whitehouse, is a little dated now. Just so you know, in case you are not a Pink Floyd fanatic like me.--User:Lord_Chess
 * Dated but still known by anyone of my age in this part of the world. However, Pink Floyd are... not, generally. Or at least not beyond "The Wall". --Kiand 18:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * "Animals" came just before "The Wall"; it never gets airplay because all the songs on it are 10 minute plus epics.--User:Lord_Chess

Humour/humor
Please see. The spelling started out as humor, that's what it should be. That is policy. Please don't revert without taking it to talk, and explaining why an exception to policy should be made. Thanks. --Cultural Freedom talk 21:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Already explained on the articles now horribly misplaced talk page. --Kiand 21:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

ermine robes
Wait 'till a certain royalist finds out!! :-D FreplySpang 15:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:UE
Hi

I saw your edits to Dublin Airport. This is the English language Wikipedia, and as a rule, the English language is used in naming. More pertinantly, for organisations such as the airport or the airport authority, names in Irish are translations and not the real name, so they are left out entirely - we don't provide French, German, Spanish or Italian translations of names where is there no official version; and this apples just as much to Irish as anything else.

There is an Irish language Wikipedia, if you want to contribute in Irish. --Kiand 14:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I don't accept nor agree with your point. You're completely wrong in saying that other languages aren't used for translations on the English wikipedia. You'll find that translations of names into other languages are in thousands of articles in the English wikipedia and articles about Ireland are no different.
 * In relation to your point regarding the Irish translation not being the offical name, you're wrong again. All government organisations' and semi-state company's names are in Irish or have Irish as part of the official name, the Dublin Airport Authority would be one of these semi-state companies and this is the main reason why I gave the Irish translation, so my changes to the Dublin Airport website will remain.

I can't allow young children to see it, others might be offended by it.
That is my belief. I can't afford to see any of that foul language here in Wikipedia. I believe that Wikipedia should be free from foul language, and I really don't think that use of foul language should be permitted. That is why I was forced to revert it. Cuss words shouldn't be used in Wikipedia whatsoever because there are some Wikipedians that MIGHT BE OFFENDED by the foul language and I can't allow it to happen. I had to reprimand the user for using a cuss word in the Sennheiser Talk page because of the foul language being used. I am fiercely detesting your last comment because I stand behind not putting foul language here in Wikipedia. I don't see any need to use foul language here in Wikipedia, and that's why not only I revert it because I don't want anyone to lose their innocence from reading the discussion, but I also have to "purge" the foul language edit because I want to protect those who might be offended by use of foul language. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 05:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Reason for removal of your comment from my talk page
The reason why I had to remove your comment from my talk page is because the user who used a bad word at the Sennheiser talk page was abusing the No Censorship policy privilege, and that "No Censorship Policy" doesn't clearly mean that people can use foul language, and I really disagree with your views. Even Wikipedia is NOT censored means that people has to do this in good faith, and respect the No Censorship Policy as a privilege. What I had to do at the Sennheiser Talk Page IS NOT vandalism—it was a sign that someone was abusing the No Censorship Policy, and I really believe that Bad Language is NOT covered under the No Censorship Policy, so vehemently, that comment at the Sennheiser Talk page had to be deleted due to the fact that it was abusing the No Censorship Policy privilege. The last thing I want to do is to start a flame war and/or personal attack, and I did NOT invoke any personal attacks, though I might disagree with some of Wikipedia's views at times.

As much as I hate to debate with someone I have a beef with, you definitely need to discuss about bad language usage and how to rectify the situation so that bad language would not be used in Wikipedia. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Anyway, if you don't believe why I feel that who posted the latest comment at the Sennheiser Talk Page deserved to be either edited and/or deleted, please read the latest comment. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 21:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

mos
Please show where it covers the use of names.--Lucy-marie 22:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I think you have made that phrase up please show where It Is I have been nothing but polite but you are now getting rude.--Lucy-marie 22:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Your phrase Is buried within the main bulk of the text and is not prominent and what dos 'recognisable form' mean and how far should recognisable form go and how far should names be formal.--Lucy-marie 22:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

In my opinion the article should be formalised to meet a higher quality standard.--Lucy-marie 22:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

It improves quality as it romoves media created names.--Lucy-marie 22:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Can uo be certian of these name being what they call them selves they could for all we know can the self zig or shirley so your tact is not entirley tru it is still a media creation.--Lucy-marie 23:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Cities of Ireland
Kiand,

Their is an ongoing discussion and disageement regarding Cities in Ireland. Their is even a vote been taken on it and it seems on editor is insistant that consensus should overide verifibility. Any comments are welcome on talk:Cities in Ireland.

Djegan 22:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The Evil Second Empire
Yes, of course I am! :-) I've been with the Fruit Company for some ten years now, over and back to the States. This time, it's permanent. Right now, I'm working on Steve's Reality Distortion Field to allow it to encompass the entire Bay Area - Alison✍ 04:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC) (also cooties.eu)

Dun Laoghaire
I note that the article for Kingstown has been moved to Dun Laoghaire, due to its official renaming by the rebel Irish Free State. Suggest that this is inconsistent with the "rules" you mentioned earlier. --MacRusgail 18:17, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It was never moved, lying does not help your case
 * Its the most common name used in English, which is what the MOS specifies is to be used. --Kiand 18:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Calling someone a liar is certainly a violation of WP:NPA. I have notified an admin. Continuing this behavior will result in a ban.--User: Lord_Chess

DVB-C
Do you have some evidence that would back up your assertion that U.S. cable systems are using DVB-C? 121a0012 02:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello,idiot!
I see that you've taken off some numismatic notices from articles that needed them. No wonder why you are so dumb! You're so typically Irish - thick as well as stupid! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.117.67 (talk • contribs)
 * Thick, stupid anon editor doesn't know how to sign. Quelle surprise! - Alison✍ 07:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Cian,nothing changes around here!
Nothing changes around here with pathetic people like you. As far as I can guess, you're a dumb Irish kid who has far too much time on your plate. No wonder why User:Wallie reckons you're a wanker! I reckon that you belong in a padded cell along with all the faggot nutcases. For all we know, you could also be a filthy subhuman homosexual. Nothing changes the fact that you're going straight downstairs to the Lake of Fire in Hell, which is where you will burn up along with Adolf Hitler and Pope John Paul II of Rome. - (202.180.72.84 02:39, 21 August 2006 (UTC))
 * Of course nothing changes. You're still banned, and I'm not. --Kiand 02:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yet Lord Chess 16:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Would you care to elaborate on that? --Kiand 17:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Bubble Hits
Thanks for improving this article, a lot better now. ant_ie 07:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC) Can you tell why in that article the references appeared twice? Thanks in advance. ant_ie 08:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Irish channels licences
I just thought I'd let you know that I was counting Irish channels to mean ones which are operated by Irish compnaies or are targeted at Ireland only; and are in Ireland. Therefore the entirety of this:

" #TWC Then theres Bubble Hits and formerly Channel 6 too. There are also the Irish services of the Viacom channels: And Sky's:
 * 1) ActionMax
 * 2) Movies4Men
 * 1) MTV Ireland
 * 2) Nickelodeon Eire
 * 3) Nick Jr. Eire
 * 4) Paramount Comedy Ireland
 * 1) Sky One
 * 2) Sky Sports One
 * 3) Sky News Ireland"

...would all be discounted as the second 2 lists aren't inside Ireland or owned by Irish companies (I don't think they'd qualify as Irish by any reasonable standards) and AFAIK the top list is mainly UK-targeted. By any means extremely is a bit of an innappropriate word to use in an encyclodpedia (e.g. how high a percentage qualifies as extreme). And btw, since when is there are Nick Jr. Ireland? NTL use the same as the UK, since they're UK ads. - Рэд хот 16:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, saying "not unheard of" does not specify whether it is a large or small percentage (since large and small are subjective) but does specify that it happens. - Рэд хот 16:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok the edit summary was bad. What I meant by "definitly not" was kind of "extremely? in an enyclopedia? No way" as well as the fact that I count them differently. Oh and the reason why I didn't believe you about the Nick Jr. thing was cause, it's not mentioned on the article for it either. - Рэд хот 18:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

When I grow up
I want to be just you like you Kiand. Seriously. Lord Chess 20:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Steve Willis AFD
Nice bit of technical back-up on the running comedy that is the Steve Willis AFD. Next someone will claim to have heard it while on an oilrig. --Charlesknight 20:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The only one left to appear at this stage is Lord Socky McSock the third earl of sockpuppetshire. --Charlesknight 19:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

He's back!
Aidan Work, banned from Wikipedia in January, is now posting as Paisleyite1976 (talk) and 202.180.98.82 (talk) (New Zealand IP). The Paisleyite connection is the same as Work's politics. See also Articles for deletion/British Commonwealth Numismatic Project where he writes his name. Hu 05:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

RTÉ Transmitters
Thanks for your comments on the links within' the channel pages for RTÉ1, RTÉ2, TV3 & TG4; I felt it was important to have a link to the first and also most powerful UHF Transmitter within Ireland. I don't feel the information is entirely duplicated as the wikipedia article contains a nice bit about the history. Would it make sense to add an external link in the Carn Clonhugh article to the RTENL page? Cheers Y control 21:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No worries, Sorry I'm not sure if I was making much sense with what I wrote; it's been a long day. As long as we're both happy, it's all good. Y control 21:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Guess who's back
it's our old chum Steve Willis....

--Charlesknight 20:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Beunited.org
A tag has been placed on Beunited.org, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Beunited.org is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template  to the page and leave a note on Talk:Beunited.org, explaining how Beunited.org is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (aeropagitica) 11:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:RTEHome2005.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:RTEHome2005.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Irish republican topics
Cian a chara, I thought you might be interested in contributing to this Irish republican wiki project. regards--Vintagekits 23:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rapture.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Rapture.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

RFC
As you were previously involved with the same behaviour with this editor which has provoked the RFC, I thought you might wish to give comment Requests_for_comment/Mark_Kim--Crossmr 04:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

It's your fault
It's your fault getting me in the middle of the mess, now you forced me into a dimension where I have to now answer this unnecessary RFC that I'm not going to link. If you didn't bother me, then I would have never been through any of this. You got me into all this mess in the first place. I'm placing the blame on you. You had RadioKirk go after me and then all sysops went after me. If you left me alone, then I wouldn't have to be placed in such a contradict like this, but because you were the person who started the mess, I have no choice but to link your user talk page to that RFC Crossmr created. — Mark Kim (U * T/R * CTD) 05:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What? I didn't "bother" you, I requested you stopped violating policy, which you didn't. After that, I'd not heard of or from you for over a year. --Kiand 21:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Thehits.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Thehits.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Commonwealth postal orders move
Hu requested that Commonwealth postal orders be moved back to Commonwealth of Nations postal orders. Since you authored the article and also expressed an interest in the name on the talk page, I'm leaving you a note about the proposal. The discussion area is here.--HarryHenryGebel 15:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dance anthem
An editor has nominated Dance anthem, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of John McGinley (politician)
I have nominated John McGinley (politician), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/John McGinley (politician). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Extreme Sports Channel

A tag has been placed on Extreme Sports Channel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Extreme Sports Channel and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ  ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣ 16:31, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Kiand! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Phil Cunningham (rock musician) -

Articles for deletion nomination of BeBits
I have nominated BeBits, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/BeBits. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pcap ping  12:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:NetPositive.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NetPositive.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikiproject British TV channels
This is a message from Wikiproject British TV channels. Please visit the main project page to reconfirm if you are actively taking part in the project and update your details. Many thanks. Auntie Beeb (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16
Hi. When you recently edited An Post, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AIB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KDL

The article KDL has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Palosirkka (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Free-to-view for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Free-to-view is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Free-to-view until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba  ller  22:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Guineys for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guineys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Guineys until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 10:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of BPM Energy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BPM Energy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BPM Energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75  (talk)  00:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Musgraves listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Musgraves. Since you had some involvement with the Musgraves redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. f e  minist  17:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ultimate Soccer Manager for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ultimate Soccer Manager is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ultimate Soccer Manager until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DocumentError (talk) 07:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kylemore railway station

The article Kylemore railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Subject fails WP:GNG. The only sources here (and seemingly the only sources anywhere) are trivial passing mentions. Where the conditional potential for the subject to exist is only mentioned in passing. A PowerPoint presentation where four words appear ('Potential Station at Kylemore'). A politician's press release where one word appears (and is bound up in so much conditional speculation as to be useless). And a passing mention in a news article (since superseded by other events). The subject here falls short of WP:GNG, WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL and any number of related policies."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 16:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kylemore railway station for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kylemore railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kylemore railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 17:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Renamed user CnELGrVopW


text: User talk:69.81.62.252

title: User talk:69.81.62.252