text:
User talk:Seingo

Hello, "Seingo" -- Infrogmation 00:53, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Storey vs. Story
Storey is the correct English spelling. "Story" is an American adaptation and thus is only appropriate for U.S.-centric articles. I know that the whole English vs. American English thing can get confusing, but please be aware of it. Cheers. Jackk 23:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Improvement drive
IP 68.50.62.82 voted for History of the World on WP:IDRIVE and signed with your name. Is that OK with you or should we disqualify the vote?--Fenice 18:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a toy
Wikipedia is not a toy. Recreating user pages of banned users, for example, User:For great justice., and filling with nonsense text is not acceptable. Please do not do this again. If you wish to experiment, use the sandbox. --Lord Deskana (swiftmend!) 16:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Raduga (film)
A tag has been placed on Raduga (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 14:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Seingo


text: File:Big Country - The Crossing.jpg

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: File:Big Country - The Crossing.jpg


text:
Talk:Fairy Meat

Untitled
needs some pictures or atleast some external links Suppafly

title: Talk:Fairy Meat


text:
Talk:Prospector

Untitled
Maybe it's time for a disambiguation page and to move the passenger train info to another page? slambo 00:55, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

title: Talk:Prospector


text:
Talk:Reading Company

–§

Article name?
I'm not sure that the article should be here. The company only had the Railroad name until 1871, when it became Railway. Then in 1923 it seems to have become the Reading Company - should it be there? Or should we go by the last railroad/railway name? This also affects the category. --SPUI (talk) 28 June 2005 03:31 (UTC)

I'm sorry, this story is just too weird. Not that a US railroad company ended up operating cinemas, but that it ended up operating them in Australia. Is it verified? Gazpacho 07:26, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Guess it's true. Not any weirder than Berkshire Hathaway, I suppose. I'll fill in some details. Gazpacho 21:36, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

The lede paragraph in this article is really bad. It should be retitled or moved to the Philadelphia and Reading railroad since the Reading company came in after the USRA returned management control to the P&R in the early 1920s. Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 14:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Richmond coal terminal
Rather than say that Richmond became a "very large coal terminal," may I suggest something like, "By the midnineteenth century, Richmond was one of the largest, if not the largest coal terminals in the country."

My source is James Holten, The Reading: History of a Coal Age Empire, Vol. I the Nineteenth century, Laury's Station, Pennsylvania: Garrigues House, 1989, p. 131. TrumpetBugleHorn 06:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Reading equipment
I think it would be a good idea to include a section on the equipment of the reading, because i know the Pennsylvania Railroad's page has a good section on their equipment and the reading deserves on as well

Included would be: Steam Locomotives(G1-G3, T1, M1, K1, I8-I10) Diesel: (FT, F7, FP7, Rs-3, Geeps) a section on passenger equipment would have RDCs, EMUs, and their wall street and crusader equiment —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannybrown1 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Reading Company: 1924–1976 and electrification
I think that I'm going to add more to the 1924-1976 history section, but I am unsure if I sould include thew electrification in that section or creat its own section latter on? mannybrown1

 * Great idea, add a more detailed article reference under the section heading ... such as laid out in the style manual ... Manual_of_Style Risk Engineer (talk) 11:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

World Wide View
When the article Reading Entertainment is finally merged here, more infomation should be added so that it has a world wide view of the subject. Right now it just focusses on the US operations and completly ignore Australia or New Zealand. Also, it needs reliable refrences. --Klltr (talk) 07:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I noticed that the merge has not yet taken place, despite the decision being made in 2010. I don't how to merger articles yet, so someone will need to do this very soon. --Klltr (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Is it Rail Road, Railroad, or Railway?
Roger SPUI. Within inches of each other under heading 'History' you see 'Rail Road', 'Railroad', and 'Railway' (in the illustration), with no explanation.

Identify, explain, and provide a table listing the names by which this road was known, and when.

Now, the listing of the presidents and their dates is more like it. Do you know how few of the other RR articles have that?

Cordially, Jim Luedke — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimlue (talk • contribs) 22:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Autolinks
And for Pete's sake remove the hyperlinks that point to the very article we are reading. (Oops--sorry for the pun.)

Actually, this is not the writers' fault. Wikipedia could easily catch and prevent it. Since they didn't, is is an un-feature of their editing interface and they are to blame.--J.L. Jimlue (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

 * I agree ..This article seems to be structured differently than other railroad articles with a number of self referencing or circular links... Risk Engineer (talk) 11:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Mackensen (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Reading Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080923230410/http://www.readingrailroad.org:80/reading/rdg_history.html to http://www.readingrailroad.org/reading/rdg_history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Philadelphia Germantown and Norristown Railroad
This should really be a separate article ... the link is a circular reference ... I plan to develop a new article on this pioneer railroad ... Risk Engineer (talk) 11:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Here is a good reference article on the PG&N RR, http://germantownnewspapers.com/The_Great_Train_Race_to_Chestnut_Hill__The_Reading_Co..html ... E709177 (talk) 17:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the info ... Risk Engineer (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Most important year withheld
We aren't told when the P&R opened. All you say is, "The portion from Reading to Norristown opened on" etc., and the "full line opened" etc. It begs the question: So what portion if any opened before Reading–Norristown, and when?

Or, do you mean Reading–Norristown was the first? If so, say it, and more importantly make it a statement about the RR itself: "The Philadelphia and Reading Rail Road  opened July 16, 1838, running from Reading to Norristown."

Point of order, Mr. Chairman
1. Don't cover a company's later period—double-tracking, vertical expansion, good old Archie McLeod, J. P. Morgan, etc.—and then start in on its history, rewinding to 1833. I came to this article expressly to find the year the P&R opened and found myself scrolling, scouring, and scowling, up & down before I found it. Sorry; make that: I didn't find it, since you don't state it.

At the risk of being obvious, state everything in chronological order. Except for, that is, if you want to start the History section with a quick overview (one which starts in 1833).

2. Caption "1833–73: Expansion" is duly Greta Garbled. If 1833–1873 was the P&R's "expansion" period, how long and how far had it been running before it started "expanding" in "1833"? Boy, I sure hope our troops guarded that road heavily to keep it out of British hands in the War of 1812.

Yours for a more un-garbled America,

Jimlue (talk) 21:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Reading Company


text:
Talk:Reading Railroad/to do

 * Add the railroad's logo
 * Add a photo or two of Reading trains
 * Add a system map
 * Expand the company history section
 * Note any preserved Reading equipment

title: Talk:Reading Railroad/to do


text: User talk:200.167.240.128

title: User talk:200.167.240.128


text:
Louis Bachelier

Louis Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Bachelier (11 March 1870 – 28 April 1946) was a French mathematician at the turn of the 20th century. He is credited with being the first person to model the stochastic process now called Brownian motion, as part of his doctoral thesis The Theory of Speculation (Théorie de la spéculation, defended in 1900).

Bachelier's doctoral thesis, which introduced the first mathematical model of Brownian motion and its use for valuing stock options, was the first paper to use advanced mathematics in the study of finance. His Bachelier model has been influential in the development of other widely used models, including the Black-Scholes model.

Bachelier is considered as the forefather of mathematical finance and a pioneer in the study of stochastic processes.

Early years
Bachelier was born in Le Havre, in Seine-Maritime. His father was a wine merchant and amateur scientist, and the vice-consul of Venezuela at Le Havre. His mother was the daughter of an important banker (who was also a writer of poetry books). Both of Louis's parents died just after he completed his high school diploma ("baccalauréat" in French), forcing him to take care of his sister and three-year-old brother and to assume the family business, which effectively put his graduate studies on hold. During this time Bachelier gained a practical acquaintance with the financial markets. His studies were further delayed by military service. Bachelier arrived in Paris in 1892 to study at the Sorbonne, where his grades were less than ideal.

The doctoral thesis
Defended on 29 March 1900 at the University of Paris, Bachelier's thesis was not well received because it attempted to apply mathematics to an area mathematicians found unfamiliar. However, his instructor, Henri Poincaré, is recorded as having given some positive feedback (though insufficient to secure Bachelier an immediate teaching position in France at that time). For example, Poincaré called his approach to deriving Gauss's law of errors very original, and all the more interesting in that Fourier's reasoning can be extended with a few changes to the theory of errors. ... It is regrettable that M. Bachelier did not develop this part of his thesis further.

The thesis received a grade of honorable, and was accepted for publication in the prestigious Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure. While it did not receive a mark of très honorable, despite its ultimate importance, the grade assigned is still interpreted as an appreciation for his contribution. Jean-Michel Courtault et al. point out in "On the Centenary of Théorie de la spéculation" that honorable was "the highest note which could be awarded for a thesis that was essentially outside mathematics and that had a number of arguments far from being rigorous."

Academic career
For several years following the successful defense of his thesis, Bachelier further developed the theory of diffusion processes, and was published in prestigious journals. In 1909 he became a "free professor" at the Sorbonne. In 1914, he published a book, Le Jeu, la Chance, et le Hasard (Games, Chance, and Randomness), that sold over six thousand copies. With the support of the Council of the University of Paris, Bachelier was given a permanent professorship at the Sorbonne, but World War I intervened and he was drafted into the French army as a private. His army service ended on December 31, 1918. In 1919, he found a position as an assistant professor in Besançon, replacing a regular professor on leave. He married Augustine Jeanne Maillot in September 1920 but was soon widowed. When the professor returned in 1922, Bachelier replaced another professor at Dijon. He moved to Rennes in 1925, but was finally awarded a permanent professorship in 1927 at the University of Besançon, where he worked for 10 years until his retirement.

Besides the setback that the war had caused him, Bachelier was blackballed in 1926 when he attempted to receive a permanent position at Dijon. This was due to a "misinterpretation" of one of Bachelier's papers by Professor Paul Lévy, who—to Bachelier's understandable fury—knew nothing of Bachelier's work, nor of the candidate that Lévy recommended above him. Lévy later learned of his error, and reconciled himself with Bachelier.

Although Bachelier's work on random walks predated Einstein's celebrated study of Brownian motion by five years, the pioneering nature of his work was recognized only after several decades, first by Andrey Kolmogorov who pointed out his work to Paul Lévy, then by Leonard Jimmie Savage who translated Bachelier's thesis into English and brought the work of Bachelier to the attention of Paul Samuelson. The arguments Bachelier used in his thesis also predate Eugene Fama's efficient-market hypothesis, which is very closely related, as the idea of a random walk is suited to predict the random future in a stock market where everyone has all the available information. His work in finance is recognized as one of the foundations for the Black–Scholes model.

Works

 * , Théorie de la spéculation
 * Also published as a book,
 * Republished in a book of combined works,
 * Translated into English,
 * Translated into English with additional commentary and background,
 * Translated into English,

 * , Théorie mathématique du jeu
 * Republished in a book of combined works,

 * , Théorie des probabilités continues
 * , Étude sur les probabilités des causes
 * , Le problème général des probabilités dans les épreuves répétées
 * , Les probabilités à plusieurs variables
 * , Mouvement d’un point ou d’un système matériel soumis à l’action de forces dépendant du hasard
 * , (Book) Calcul des probabilités
 * Republished,

 * , Les probabilités cinématiques et dynamiques
 * , Les probabilités semi-uniformes
 * , (Book) Le Jeu, la Chance et le Hasard
 * Republished,
 * Translated into English, Harding 2017

 * , La périodicité du hasard
 * , Sur la théorie des corrélations
 * , Sur les décimales du nombre $${\pi}$$
 * , Le problème général de la statistique discontinue
 * , Quelques curiosités paradoxales du calcul des probabilités
 * , (Book) Les lois des grands nombres du Calcul des Probabilités (Book)
 * , (Book) La spéculation et le Calcul des Probabilités
 * , (Book) Les nouvelles méthodes du Calcul des Probabilités
 * , Probabilités des oscillations maxima
 * Erratum,

title: Louis Bachelier


text:
Talk:Sandusky (locomotive)/to do

 * Add details on the locomotive specifications
 * Add information on the railroad on which this engine operated
 * Add further information on the locomotive's disposition
 * Add an image of the locomotive; if a photo can't be found, how about a builder's drawing?
 * The wording in the paragraph discussing this engine's trip to Ohio is a little cumbersome.

title: Talk:Sandusky (locomotive)/to do


text:
User talk:Obradovic Goran

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful. In addition, you might want to add yourself to the new user log; if you made any edits before getting an account, you may wish to assign those to your username.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Finally, here are some open tasks:

Hope to see you around the Wiki! And if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page! Neutrality (hopefully!) 00:58, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ducic.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, BrokenSegue 00:17, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * Hi! Regarding photo that I've uploaded: I'm not familiar with GDFL and that other stuff, but picture is from Serbian Wikipedia, so i guess that it's not copyrighted. Djordjes posted it on Serbian wiki, and here is his User page on Serbian wiki, where you can contact him in English (or tell me what to ask him).

By the way, Jovan Ducic died in 1943, 62 years ago, so copyright of this photo (if any) should have expired long ago --Obradović Goran ( t al k  00:57, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * I was just going to ask you if you could contact Djordjes. You should (does he even speak english) ask him where he got the image from and why he thinks the image is free to use. (If he does speak english I'll talk to him) I found the page where the image is on the Serbian wiki &. I can't read the text below the picture but I think that it is just the man's name. Copyrights are based upon the death of the artist not the subject so the picture isn't necesarily free to use. Although I have a feeling it is. If Djordjes doesn't respond i'll leave the image with a link to the other wiki. Thanks Again! BrokenSegue 01:09, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * P.S. You don't need to copy your responses to both your talk page and mine.
 * P.S.S. Read up on your edits, welcome ambassador of Serbia :) BrokenSegue

Sorry for taking so long to respond. I'm no expert on copyright law so I passed this case on to Neutrality hopefully he will have time to solve this in the future. Thanks for translating that text for me. BrokenSegue 00:11, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Embassy
Hi, thanks for agreeing to be one of the ambassadors. There isn't any formal process to go through -- just add your name to Local Embassy and Embassy. Angela. 19:39, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

Quote
Hi, the quote on my user page is, I believe, from Jimbo Wales and it's on the Donations page. See here. Best, SlimVirgin 00:36, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

I fixed your link in the embassy
...so that now it will point to this page.

I hope you've no objections to my having added myself. Budi siguran da, if something vital comes up (that is, if someone asks an important question), I'll ask you first...Otherwise, please tell me and I'll remove myself. --VKokielov 02:01, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

On the other hand...
Since it doesn't look like it's so simple - I was just over at sr:& - I'll remove my name.

thank you very very much!!
hello! very nice to meet you! because i love your motherland, i often feel sorrow that i hadn't learn serbian. your significative moves me very much! thank you very much! you have all my best wishes!!! it's too late in china now! i have to go to sleep, good night (good day in serbia)!*^_^* --icywind 15:29, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Kate's tool
Hi. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I'd recommend you either get in touch with Kate (sending an email from here might be most effective) or with another developer. Hope this helps! Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 20:33, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Serbian cross
Google search for "srpski krst" in Latin alphabet finds 45 results and in Cyrillic 1180(!?), while for "srpska ocila" in Latin 15 and in Cyrillic one. So I guess it's clear which term is used more oftenly. I'll add more info on firesteels, and you can edit it yourself if you think more should be added - you don't need to ask me for permission :) Nikola 15:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Pavlov's House
See commons:Pavlov's House, although i have difficulties linking the russian language images to the english wiki. -- Chris 73 Talk 21:16, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the info! It's great that we have these pictures. Could they be renamed to the Latin alphabet, if software isn't supporting Cyrillic? -- Obradović Goran ( t al k  22:32, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
 * See also Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#foreign language image names. I think I will rename the image on the commons. -- Chris 73 Talk 11:20, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Changed image names. Also added image of Pavlow to his article. -- Chris 73 Talk 11:38, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Rosa Luxemburg
Hi Goran, it looks like it was a typo for 1899. I've changed it. Saintswithin July 5, 2005 17:44 (UTC)

Re:Black Sabbath:Paranoid rulz
Damn straight. If you can ever get a hold of it, listen to Supernaut off of Black Sabbath, Vol. 4. Your talk link was so pretty I had to click it... @_@ *hypnotized* Redwolf24 02:05, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Please don't reply on my talk page until I archive it. Thanks~

Serbian portal
As the amount of material somehow connected with Serbs and Serbia on Wikipedia grows, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to form a SCG/Serb portal, so that all the articles about famous Serbs, Serb history, the Serb republic etc are more closely interlinked. This would also provide the casual reader with a easy to use encyclopaedia of everything they could wish to know about RS, SCG, the Serb diaspora etc. Јес' да је Србија мала и да је мало Срба али ипак има Палестински портал, Doctor Who портал, зато нема разлога да и ми ово не покренемо. At this stage I'm just gauging the amount of interest out there for this. If you support тхис идеа, and want to help out, then just drop by my talk page -- estavisti 20:02, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Russian tsarinas
regarding the names of tsarinas of Russia: if from abroad, they changed their first name, such as Wilhelmina became Natalia Alexeievna, etc. Now, Wikipedia has certain rules that the so-called consort name is not to be used, because of several persons being e.g Empress Maria Fedorovna. And that a pre-marital name should be used. But I feel that it is acceptable to make a formulation "Natalia Alexeievna of Darmstadt" (the "of Darmstadt" being for disambiguation purposes) instead of using "Wilhelmina of Darmstadt". Now, as there are plenty of Germanist and anglicist opinions, I would like to know some of international opinion. In other words, I am asking you to think whether from the perspective of non-Russian Slavonic, (1) would it be acceptable to say "Natalia Alexeievna of Darmstadt" and (2) would that be better or worse than "Wilhelmina of Darmstadt". 62.78.105.68 08:31, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

 * I think that "Natalia Alexeievna of Darmstadt" seems fine. Then again, I'm a Slav, and this name is "closer" to me. I'm not really familiar with Russian royal customs, so I can't say this or that is the right thing to do, I only can say that (esthetically) Natalia beats Wilhelmina - Wilhelmina is also OK. I am really sorry that I can't give you some more argumentated assistance :( -- Obradović Goran ( t al k  00:23, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

 * BTW, this is an ongoing policy discussion, and the anon has not listed all of the options being considered. If you're interested, the discussion is at this talk page. Best, Choess 01:08, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

I read your opinion: "These persons won their right to be in this encyclopedia mostly by being Empresses of Russia, and thus their articles should be named by their post-conversion names. When it comes to voting, I think that the best choice would be 2 or 4. Disambiguating by years seems silly (if I know so much about a person – why looking up at Wikipedia :)" -- and I am thankful to you as now I know a perspective of an outsider Slav.

There is an ongoing vote now also at Talk:Alexandra Fyodorovna of Hesse where I have been willing to approve the alternatives "Alexandra Fyodorovna of Hesse", "Alexandra Fedorovna of Hesse" and "Alexandra of Hesse", whereas I am against "Alix of Hesse" and "Alix of Hesse and by Rhine". The situation seems rather similar and it seems we are in agreement basically. I think that "Alexandra Fyodorovna of Russia" is an acceptable English translation of a name form which could be in use in books, papers and other literature in some Slavic languages.

In my opinion, none of these alternatives are easy, mostly because those women changed their first names when already adults. We just should find the most elegant solution.

Russian royal customs apparently have almost nothing to do with this, they would have probably wanted to call her as "Empress Alexandra Fyodorovna of Russia", but then there is the disambiguation problem, as there existed also another empress A.F. Arrigo 09:33, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Мрцина
Е па стварно,мрцина не да није засрдела,него се није ни оладила а ти си се већ бачио.(Све,све ал` зар не виде да сам планирао још нешто да испишем,но добро ти ће га више пута исписаваш.) --CrniBombarder!!! 06:59, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Ма нисам те #%&$"# због тога што си преводио,него што си га превео док још није био готов(а и зато што си ме врашки натрипов`о).Да,прећи ћемо на урођенички,него је ово било чисто међу нама,па зато. --CrniBombarder!!! 19:52, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Jovanvb
Re: your email.

 * I've noticed that you have blocked user Jovanvb.

Have I? No such action appears in the blocklog.

 * I am aware that you block a fair number of users just like this one, but I expect your personal apology to Jovan because of this abominable act!

Do you? That's nice. Evercat 23:27, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I don't know if you've blocked an actual user or IP number (diference is only semantical, isn't it).

There's a very big difference. If I block an IP address and it affects a legitimate user, it doesn't mean I was targetting that user.

 * If the username is the only thing that is bothering you, why don't you just block the user, instead of blocking every IP number that chap ever used?

I have just blocked the username. There is however a feature in the software, whereby any IP address a blocked user logs in from is automatically blocked for 24 hours...

 * You can read here what info I got.

It says:

 * The reason given is this: Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Evercunt". The reason given for Evercunt's block is: "Username".

You see the prefix Auto- meaning automatic.

 * Your IP address is 82.117.194.66. Please include this address, along with your username, in any queries you make.

Which you didn't do. I have now unblocked 82.117.194.66.

Evercat 10:45, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Grb-novibeograd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-novibeograd.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use  .)  If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Creidhne 22:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I think that it can go under fair use (but I'm not an expert for those things). -- Obradović Goran ( t al k  22:52, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

IP blocking
Hi Fvw! I'm experiencing some problems due to the activity of the vandal with the IP number 82.117.194.66, and your efforts to restrain him. I am using the Serbia Broadband ISP's proxy for Internet surfing, which is unfortunately the same IP number our problematic contributor is using. I fully well understand that you're doing what you must, but I would like to inform you that SBB is a big ISP, with a lot of users, and 2 of burrecrats from Serbian Wikipedia are using that very same IP number, and they are affected by blockings.

Angela and other admins on IRC told me that it is very uncommon practise to block IP numbers infinitely. If there is necessity for blocking IP 82.117.194.66, could you please try to keep it as short as possible, in accordance with frequency of vandal's activity, since it affects several contributors. -- Obradović Goran ( t al k  18:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Heya, sorry for the inconvenience. There is some misconception about this with some of the older wikipedians, but in fact it's policy to block open proxies indefinitely on the english wikipedia.
 * Anyway, so far for the bad news, now the good news: I can no longer access the proxy at 82.117.194.66, so it would appear the ISP in question got their act together and locked down their proxy. Let's hope it sticks, and happy editing! --fvw *  18:59, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

User Categorization
You were listed on the Wikipedians/Serbia and Montenegro page as living in or being associated with Serbia and Montenegro. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro for instructions. -Alekk 23:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem RE: Image:Opstinebgd.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Opstinebgd.gif. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:
 * The copyright holder, and
 * The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this:.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:
 * An open content licence
 * Public Domain
 * Fair Use

 * The copyright holder gets the best protection of his work by licencing their work under an open content license like the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. If you have the express permission of the copyright holder to licence their work under the above licence, use the image copyright tag: cc-by-sa-2.5.  The GNU Free Documentation License is another choice for licencing one's work.  Again, if you have the express permission of the copyright holder, use the tag: GFDL.

 * The copyright holder can also release his work into the public domain, see here for images released into the public domain.

 * Images from certain sources are automatically release into the Public Domain. This is true for most governments like the federal United States government. (See   here  for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments)  However not all governments release their work into the public domain, such as the UK government (See herefor images from the UK government).  Non-free licence governments are listed here.

 * Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of Fair Use. To see if this image qualifies and then how to tag it, see Fair use.

For any other sources of for more information see Image copyright tags. Please remember that if you don't tag your images, they will be deleted.

 * P.S. If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them.  Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. --Dijxtra 12:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

RS
Hi. There is a revert war going on Republika Srpska article. Would you please come to Talk:Republika_Srpska to check the discussion and give your opinion? Nikola 18:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Please rephrase your comment
I noticed your comment on Aleksandra Selakovich's talk page. Describing someone as a notorious liar is likely to be construed as a personal attack. Since you describe yourself as an "ambassador of Serbian Wikipedia on English Wikipedia", I'm sure this is not an impression you actually wish to give. Please consider amending your comments, especially the section heading: you could even phrase it as a question to the user, asking her where the department mentioned actually is. It might simply be an error in translation. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 09:52, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Obradovic, thanks for your support on my RFA. I very much appreciate it. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to ask. See you around! —thames 18:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

from User:Macedonian
First time I hear that Bitola was mostly populated with Albanians. It seems even funny. My origin (from my father's side) is from Bitola. Ririculous claims... Thanks guys... Macedonian 21:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Hello! Why not add Croatian and Bosnian languages among those spoken by thee? HolyRomanEmperor 19:48, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! :) But I still think that you should state Bosnian and Croatian. wiki:Babel states that your language knowlegde can variate from native to those you should know, but don't. HolyRomanEmperor 21:36, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Zar stvarno misliš, da ako govoriš srpski jezik, ne razumiješ hrvatski i bosanski? (in which of the three languages I wrote just now?) HolyRomanEmperor 21:38, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

I know that my curiosity mihght seem a bit aggressive, but I meant nothing bad; only your opinion on the matter (and I am all ears) HolyRomanEmperor 09:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

I understand. I need to ask you something. What is your knowlegde on the Medieval History of our peoples in here (Rascia, Doclea, Travunia, Zachlumia, Pagania, Bosnia, Dalmatia, Croatia, Pannonia, Slavonia, ...)?

OK, thanks anyway. Tell, do you plan on returning to Bosnia? HolyRomanEmperor 16:52, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Zemun. I am from Karlovac; peasants from my mother's side; large landowners, traders and low (Military Frontier status) noblemen from Lika and the City of Karl. HolyRomanEmperor 15:03, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Deleting posts
Hi OG, I've left a note for the anon on his talk page. Let me know if he does it again. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

I heard that you're translating? Could you (when you have free time) deal with the Pagania article? Here, for the source: HolyRomanEmperor 17:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Izvini, ali sam nešto bolestan (neke bakterije), pa neću moći da dođem (jedno vrijeme). HolyRomanEmperor 17:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Jovan Cvijic.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Jovan Cvijic.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Agnte 17:17, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Yep, for sure. If you've got the source information then include that and use  with that image.  Good find! Agnte 21:42, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * If you assert that he painted it, and you know that to be true, then its up to someone else to prove you wrong, so that information is fine to my knowledge :) Agnte 21:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Will you have time for it? HolyRomanEmperor 19:23, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Za Neretljane... Ono gore-pomenuto. HolyRomanEmperor 10:51, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Za Neretljane... Ono gore-pomenuto. HolyRomanEmperor 10:53, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Look at this: and put your vote if you can. Thanks in advance. HolyRomanEmperor 12:14, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Pih, I need to ask you for another favour: History of Bosnia; vandal User:Emir_Arven has (unexplainingly) deleted my edits. Please revert the vandal's change to my last I cannot, it would be 3RR violation. The vandal just said "yes" and deleted important info. HolyRomanEmperor 17:05, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Zastava-cukarica.gif has been listed for deletion

 * --Romeo Bravo 20:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Zastava-rakovica.gif has been listed for deletion

 * --Romeo Bravo 20:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Zastava-savskivenac.gif has been listed for deletion

 * --Romeo Bravo 20:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Zastava-vracar.gif has been listed for deletion

 * --Romeo Bravo 20:19, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

sorry
Hi, someone on the reference desk told me I could ask you something, I hope it doesn't bother you. what does this mean?

smješten na dodiru južne Bukovice i Ravnih Kotara, u sjevernoj Dalmaciji, dio Zadarske županije. Zbog svog zemljopisnog položaja; ini važno prometno sjecište cestovnih pravaca Zadar - Knin, Biograd - Obrovac, Novigrad - Šibenik, te željezni; kog pravca Zadar - Knin. Od gospodarskih grana razvijena je poljoprivreda (sto;arstvo, ratarstvo, vo; arstvo i vinogradarstvo), prerada grož; a, eksploatacija plo;astog kamena, obu; arska i metalna industrija.

thank you. :D

 * Ok, here goes translation:

 * It is positioned on the meeting point of the southern Bukovica and Ravni Kotari, in northen Dalmatia, part of Zadar zupanija (zupanija = administrative entity of Croatia). Because of its geographical position; it (?) important trafic juncture of road routes Zadar - Knin, Biograd - Obrovac, Novigrad - Sibenik, then railway; which direction Zadar - Knin. Of economic branches developed are agriculture (cattle, husbandry, orchardry and vineyards), grape processing, stone exploatation, shoemaking industry and metal industry.

It is clear that this section of the text describes some village or town.

Note that text isn't in Serbian, but in Croatian, so I had problem with understanding some parts (hence question mark).

Hope this worked for you. -- Obradović Goran ( t al k  00:44, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

THANX A LOT!!! :D u have no idea how much this helped! by the way, I'm a 20 year old peruvian. thanx again :)

 * Don't be so unconfident in your language skills. In the text č is for some arcane reason (I have a few theories) transferred to ; so the word is "čini" and should be translated, of course, as "is". Nikola 08:25, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Belgrade municipality flags
Hey :) -- Yes, copyright status is one of the reasons for being nominated on IfD, but they are mainly there because they are not used on the en-Wiki. And im spring cleaning 30k images here on en-Wiki. --Romeo Bravo 01:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Coat of Arms are usualy PD, but its questionable. Also, I'm not sure if you are the creator, but they seem a bit, child-like in their drawings, or a Microsoft Paint job. (no offence ment if you created them). Flags and Coat of Arms last time I checked can be uploaded to the commons, which would allow useage over all wikis not just en, so might be another idea when they are needed next time. --Romeo Bravo 01:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Admin, laughs uh huh... havent tried tho. And good, I didnt think you drew them ;)

--Romeo Bravo 01:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Though if you want to nominate me, I wouldnt object :p Romeo Bravo 02:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Im not sure, though a question at Village Pump might be appropriate... when i get a transfer from pl or he to en, i usualy tag it GFDL-presumed --Romeo Bravo 02:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Translation Help
Hi, I'm having a really hard time translating this article from Serbian Wikipedia. The article on here is really needing more information and that seems to the most nicely outlined source. I would greatly appreciate if you could do a quick run-through translation of the article for me and put it on Milhajlo Petrovic-Alas. Even if it is the worst translation you can do - no problem - I will fix up the English to my best ability. Thank you so much. Antidote 21:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

I have an old book (relatively old anyway) called Mathematics: A History of the Contributors (thats a rough translation - it's in German). There was a small section on Alas and it somewhat biased me to believe he is highly unsung. However there aren't many English sources on him online. I remember coming across a very extensive biography excerpt from a Serbian book called "Eleven Serbian Scientists" or something like that. Maybe you've heard of it? I may be remembering wrong. Antidote 21:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your excellent work on Petrovic-Alas! Antidote 03:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

The image might be fairurse under the ((art)) tag - which allows for images made after 1923. Not sure when it was painted, but if the other one is more famous then we should use that one anyway. Antidote 03:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

 * Hi. I just read your comment about the biography. Though I am a foreign reader (foreign to Serbia), I find the information on the person Petrovic more fulfilling than information on his mathematical achievements, however, I certainly do agree that there should be a section detailing his contributions. I have tried to find some information on this but there are very few free online sources that aren't in Serbian. I can only minimally read Serbian, and thus can only make very poor translations. Being a resident of Belgrade (I'm assuming), your English is unbelievably good. Maybe it's just the Americans/Australians/Canadians who don't know anything but their own native English. Anyway, I have written a biography on another Serbian mathematician, Jovan Karamata, and I am also severely lacking information detailing his contributions. Whenever I get some major free time, I'll try to look up both. Antidote 20:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
 Thanks  Thanks for your recent support on my RfA. It passed with a final vote of 24/1/2 :-). If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message! --Admrboltz (T | C) 04:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Vladimir Velebit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vladimir Velebit.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrboltz (T | C) 17:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * There is no source information on serbian wiki either... --Admrboltz (T | C) 17:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Image
Please, I would like to know the licence of file to add it to copy, we had a a problems with it on cs. wiki. Answer me to my disscussion or User talk:Aktron --Aktron 14:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Discussion regarding category
Hello. There is a discussion going on regarding a category you belong to, Amateur Radio Operator. It involves naming and categorization for this and some related categories. Your inputs would be valued. Thank you. --StuffOfInterest 01:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

We need your help regarding Amateur Radio
As StuffOfInterest said, please come by Category_talk:Amateur_Radio_Operator where we are discussing how to organize the identification of Amateur Radio Operators written about in and who are users on Wikipedia. Steve Kd4ttc 03:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Haradinaj.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Haradinaj.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay but it still doesn't contain source info. It says it came from the Serbian Wikipedia but there's no licensing info there either.  See below...  —Wknight94 (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Haradinaj.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Haradinaj.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kariba.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kariba.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 11:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bata_zivojinovic2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bata_zivojinovic2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 11:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Una 10 big.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Una 10 big.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Dethomas 18:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Milenko.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Milenko.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 10:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Petrovic1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Petrovic1.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.

Image Tagging for Image:Beogradski_maraton.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Beogradski_maraton.png. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 12:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Djordjevic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Djordjevic.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. SteinbDJ 15:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Arso Jovanović
Hi, I came across your article on General Jovanović while doing some routine spelling fix-ups. I have tagged it for copy-editting, as I believe it would benefit from some rewording by a native English speaker.

I would be happy to do this over the next few weeks, but I need someone with knowledge of the subject to check that the subject is left unchanged. Do you know of any English language reference material which I could look at around this subject? Dunstan 16:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Beograd-vel-grb.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Beograd-vel-grb.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

bs.vikipedija
Išao sam na bs. vikipediju, pisao članke o tim stvarima, bio napadnut i dobio te izjave od njihovih el-mudžahepedijanaca.--TheFEARgod 13:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Mehmed Pasa Sokullu
Gorane, bojim se da će mi trebati vasa pomoć na jednom clanku Mehmed Pasha Sokolović. Vi ste iz Bosne, pa biste mogli to razjasnit. --HolyRomanEmperor 16:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

You might also find Bosnian Serbs if you'd like to edit whenever you want. --HolyRomanEmperor 17:05, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Djordjevic1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Djordjevic1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

False Friends of the Slavist
Please have a look at False Friends of the Slavist. With your language skills, you can help us very much there, though there is not too much to be done. See also wikibooks:Talk:False Friends of the Slavist for details on what is still needed. Thanks in advance! --Daniel Bunčić 18:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Tito-Velebit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tito-Velebit.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 02:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Bora_todorovic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bora_todorovic.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 06:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Chetnik-officer.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Chetnik-officer.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 14:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Desanka1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Desanka1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 16:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dositej Obradovic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dositej Obradovic.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 23:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dragan nikolic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dragan nikolic.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 23:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ka 25 01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ka 25 01.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 14:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ka 25.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ka 25.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 14:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Milena dravic2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Milena dravic2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 14:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RadeSerbedzija.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RadeSerbedzija.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 16:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Article Improvement Belgrade
You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, -- serbiana -  talk  02:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:General pukovnik Arso Jovanovic 2.jpg
Hi, Image:General pukovnik Arso Jovanovic 2.jpg can't be proved to be PD or fair use without us knowing more about where the photo came from. For instance, if it was taken by a news photographer working for a US newspaper, it would be still be under copyright and probably not fair use either. So we need to know the source. Stan 13:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

ss waffen
lol samo da se ti se javim

Ako mozes pogledaj clanak o Dobrici Cosicu ovde na engleskm i reci sta mislisDzoni 04:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

COTW Project
You voted for Lipovans, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -Scottwiki 04:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Belgrade is the Current AID Article
Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team

Some Help Needed
I see you natively speak Serbian and I'm wondering if you could do a word by word translation of the Uros Predic article from the Serbian Wikipedia into English. Here's the linke sr:Урош Предић. It doesn't have to be perfect English - just a rought translation I can use to organize into an article. I'll handle the grammar and spelling. :D Thank you so much. Antidote 19:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Thank you so much :). I'll return the favor whenever you need it. Antidote 12:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Re:Regarding your comment on Meta
I do not think the language is uncommon or insignificant. I just believe that we should focus on the development of the English, German, Chinese, etc. Wikiversities before we start a Serbian language one. --Gray Porpoise 00:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

 * Please, do not take my vote too harshly. Your opinion matters, too. --Gray Porpoise 16:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

 * "But I am afraid that, initially, its viability is limited to the three languages (English, German and French) which have largest Wikipedias." -Hégésippe (under voting for German Wikiversity)
 * I support the creation of Serbian Wikiversity, just not the immediate creation. As I said two messages ago, I am not denying the language's importance. --Gray Porpoise 17:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Church in Rudolfsgnad
Hi! I had a break, but I'm here now. The Catholic church in Rudolfsgnad was hit by aerial bomb from German airplane unintentionally, and it was leveled in 1948. Luftburger 21:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Translation
Hello! A while ago you signed up to help translate articles from other Wikipedias at Translators available.

This page has since become obsolete and has been replaced by two userbox templates.

If you are still interested in translating, you may sign up again by using one of the following userboxes on your userpage :

'''

We hope to see you soon on Translation!

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:Grb-mladenovac.jpg, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 23:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:Grbshs.jpg, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 08:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Grb-Paracin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-Paracin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Grb-obrenovac.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-obrenovac.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:63rdparachute.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:63rdparachute.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Random Smiley Award
 For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Awardoriginated by Pedia-I (Explanation and Disclaimer)

--TomasBat (Talk) 13:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Anon. message from user page
cao, jel moze da se nabavi vektroski grb zemuna, hitno.....matijagligo@yahoo.com

( originally posted by anonymous user on my user page, moved here by me -- Obradović Goran ( t al k  02:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC) )

 * Ја га немам, нити га могу набавити. -- Obradović Goran ( t al k  02:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

CRNA RUKA
Ciao, jel mozes da me kontaktiras na email "sensei [at] crsx.org" imam jedno pitanje u vezi sa poreklom slike koju si zakacio uz stranicu o Crnoj Ruci —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sensei-CRS (talk • contribs) 12:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC).

Tomislav Nikolić
Thanks for fixing my spelling error on Tomislav Nikolić. Perspicacite 01:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bguniverzitet.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bguniverzitet.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Visoki napon
Thanks for the helpful comments on the matter. Very much appreciated =). Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC).

Dragan Radulović
Hi! I see you helped out on a recent AfD and I'm asking if you can have a look at this article. It appears from the number sources (linked on Talk:Dragan Radulović that he's notable, but I can't read them to judge. I'm not asking you to work on this article but rather to see if you have any information on the person as to whether he's notable or who I could ask for help on this. I already posted it to WP:CLEANUP but I'm not sure we'll find eds there. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Thank you so much for your help and information -- it pointed me in the right direction. Have a nice day! Travellingcari (talk) 04:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

New Wikiproject
Anonymous101 (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

hi
i like your user page image! you may also want to look at Peters projection which illustrates similar bias present in other maps towards northern hemisphere. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Jovan Cvijic.png
A tag has been placed on Image:Jovan Cvijic.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Todor→Bozhinov 16:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Petar Kocic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Petar Kocic.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

File:Kalemegdan01.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kalemegdan01.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. – Quadell (talk) 22:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject TRANSWIKI
You are invited to join WikiProject TRANSWIKI and join the sub language project of your choice. The aim is to draw up a full directory of missing articles from other wikipedias by language and build a team of translators to work at bridging the gaps in knowledge between other wikipedias. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 17:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Henry McIver.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Henry McIver.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Obradovic Goran! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ljubiša Jokić -

Proposed deletion of Ljubiša Jokić

The article Ljubiša Jokić has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Fails to meet biography guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►</b> (<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>) 05:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Hajduk veljko.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hajduk veljko.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:49, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Science
Hi Goran,

I would be really happy if we could join forces for future "Wiki Loves Science" activities, and possibly a medical version thereof. With a smile, -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ljubisa Samardzic.jpg

The file File:Ljubisa Samardzic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Milutin Garasanin 2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Milutin Garasanin 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been removed from Local Embassy due to inactivity
Hi Obradovic Goran! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Local Embassy.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Obradovic Goran


text:
Allan Beekman

Allan Beekman (January 16, 1913 – October 29, 2001) was an American reporter and author who wrote The Niihau Incident, Crisis: The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor and Southeast Asia and Hawaiian Tales.

Life
Born in Utica, New York, Beekman moved to Hawaii as a young man in the early 1930s and lived there the remainder of his life. Severe deafness, which began at the age of 16, and the Great Depression kept him from going to college as a young man. He became fluent in the Japanese language, enabling him to write about the Japanese experience from Japanese language sources not available in English. He also became a scholar in Japanese immigrant history.

He was a reporter for the Honolulu Star-Bulletin and later wrote features and a weekly book review for more than 20 years at Pacific Citizen, a weekly newspaper directed to Americans of Japanese descent. Beekman championed the rights of Japanese Americans with articles and letters to the editor of Honolulu dailies, along with local political commentaries.

During the 1960s and 1970s, Beekman also worked as a security guard at Queen's Medical Center.

Beekman married Take Okawa, a former Japanese-language schoolteacher educated in Tokyo and Hawaii, who collaborated with her husband on several Japanese immigrant stories.

He died in Honolulu, Hawaii on October 29, 2001.

Works
Several of the stories in Hawaiian Tales, published in 1972, dealt with pre-, post-, and wartime experiences of Japanese immigrants.

The Niihau Incident was a nonfiction account of the crash-landing of a Japanese Zero on the Hawaiian island of Niihau immediately following the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. Beekman was the first to uncover some important details, until then unavailable in English, of the story of the Japanese fighter pilot, Shigenori Nishikaichi. Nishikaichi, unable to return to his carrier after the attack, crashed on the American island of Niihau and terrorized its residents for seven days. During this time the U.S. government was completely unaware of his presence there. After many years of original and in-depth research, Beekman grew to be the world authority on this incident.

title: Allan Beekman


text:
Talk:Schenectady Locomotive Works

Schenectady No. 1
According to this article, Schenectady No. 1 was once owned by Purdue University. It would have been housed in the Mechanical Engineering engine bay and connected to a dynamometer. Other engines were tested there over the years. Working engines would be run up to the football field, blowing their whistle every time Purdue scored a goal. They were collectively known as the "Boilermaker Special." The "Reuben Wells," a 0-10-0T was a commonly used engine for this purpose. It is now at the Indianapolis Children's Museum.

https://www.prf.org/researchpark/purdue%20railyard/ Dan Bollinger (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:Schenectady Locomotive Works


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Patrick Kaderbek

John Patrick Kaderbek
Non-notable adolescent. —No-One Jones (m) 00:59, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * "This article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it". We can help Wikipedia even more by removing it. Delete, vanity. Pnot 01:09, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Well he's on the stage crew so I might be tempted for it to stay, but oh well... delete.
 * Vote was by User:Zachlipton

 * Duuuuuuuuuuuuuude! Deleeeeeeeeete.  Vanity. Geogre 01:35, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete the article and associated image. --Slowking Man 02:32, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * This dude is like, totally notable for like, wearing camo pants and combat boots, and also for like, thinking Tool is like, totally rad. (Nah, I'm just yanking your chains. Delete.) -[[User:Livajo|力伟|т]] 03:57, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Methinks he needs to spend a little less time with computers. Delete. -R. fiend 07:15, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --Improv 14:54, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not funny enough for BJAODN :( Ashibaka ✎ 18:31, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. MarkS 20:41, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I put the stub notice on the article because the text was completely different at that time, making him look like a journalist who might be notable. Look at the history. Anyway, delete this article if it is still about this person by the end of the VFD period. Academic Challenger 22:35, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable DCEdwards1966 17:22, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Schenectady Locomotive Works/to do

 * Expand the company history, noting the plant's importance to ALCO (it became ALCO's headquarters)
 * Add a photo or two of Schenectady locomotives

title: Talk:Schenectady Locomotive Works/to do