text:
Lake Mahinerangi

Lake Mahinerangi is a lake formed when a dam was built on the Waipori River for hydroelectric generation. The lake is 35 km to the west of Dunedin in New Zealand's South Island. Construction of the dam started in 1903 and since 1907, power has been produced.

Naming
The lake was named for Dorothy Kathleen Mahinerangi Burnett. She was the daughter of William Burnett, who was mayor of Dunedin in 1911 and 1912. The lake has a maximum length of 12 km, and lies on the western side of Maungatua, above and to the west of the Berwick Forest. It is surrounded by farmland, tussock grasslands, and plantation forest.

Hydro-electric development
The tributaries of the Waipori River are in the Lammerlaw Range. The river descends gradually until the Waipori Gorge, where it suddenly drops 222 m in approximately 4,000 m. This makes the gorge an ideal site for a hydro-electric scheme. The first proposals to develop the river for hydro-electric generation were prepared in 1900, for powering gold mining dredges. However, the plans were eventually altered to supply power to Dunedin city and surrounding districts. Construction began in early 1903.

The generating plant commenced operation on 27 April 1907. Electricity was transmitted to Halfway Bush substation in Dunedin via two 33 kV lines. However, there was no storage built into the original scheme, and in the first year of operation, low flows in the river led to constraints on the generating capacity. Between 1907 and 1913, some storage lakes were created on tributaries, including an early concrete arch dam on Pioneer Creek.

There was opposition from gold mining interests that blocked the development of storage capacity on the Waipori River itself, because Waipori Flat was still being actively mined. In 1920, the Dunedin City Corporation Empowering Act was successfully pushed through Parliament, against opposition from mining interests, to enable the use of the Waipori River as a hydro-electric reservoir.

The first dam was built in 1923, and later raised, but ultimately had to be abandoned because of inadequate foundations. A second Empowering Act of 1924 enabled another dam to be built further downstream, with work beginning in 1927, and completing in 1931. Lake Mahinerangi was formed by this new 20.4 m high dam, and an additional powerhouse of 3,000 kW capacity was commissioned. The new lake submerged the mining township of Waipori.

The Mahinerangi Dam was completed to its final height of 33.5 m in 1946. By 1955, two more generating stations had been built downstream from the original powerhouse. There have been further replacements and additions to generating capacity between the 1960s and 1980s.

The Waipori hydro-electric scheme includes a network of four dams and power stations and produces a maximum output of 84 MW.

Arms
At the southern end, the lake has two major arms, called Loch Luella and Loch Loudon.

Fishing
The lake is well stocked with brown trout and some perch. The elevation is nearly 2,000 ft and the lake can be very windswept and cold, which makes the fishery best suited to the warmer months.

Wind farm
Trustpower's Mahinerangi Wind Farm is located to the north of the lake.

title: Lake Mahinerangi


text:
Lake Waitaki

Lake Waitaki is the smallest, oldest and most downstream of the three man-made lakes on the Waitaki River, and forms part of the Waitaki hydroelectric scheme in New Zealand's South Island. It lies downstream of lakes Aviemore and Benmore on the Waitaki River, close to the town of Kurow. It is part of the traditional boundary of the Canterbury and Otago regions (although the official border has been moved southward to include the entire lake, as well as the entire northwest portion of Waitaki District within the Canterbury Region.

The lake is created by the Waitaki Dam, a 36m high concrete gravity dam built between 1928 and 1934. Waitaki Dam was the first hydroelerctic dam built on the Waitaki river. The Waitaki power station has a total installed capacity of 105MW.

Waitaki was the last dam built in New Zealand with excavation done with pick and shovel, not heavy machinery. The power station is to be upgraded by Meridian Energy between 2011 and 2016 at a projected cost of $NZ 60 – 80 million.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Lake Waitaki


text:
Feliks Paweł Jarocki

Feliks Paweł Jarocki (Pacanów, 14 January 1790 – 25 March 1865, Warsaw) was a Polish zoologist and entomologist.

Life
Jarocki was a Doctor of Liberal Arts and Philosophy. He organized and managed the Zoological Cabinet of the Royal University of Warsaw from 1819 to 1862. The collection was based on that of Baron Sylwiusz Minckwitz, which included over 20,000 specimens. Jarocki built up this collection through purchases and scientific expeditions to eastern Poland. He also acquired many important books for the zoological library. When he retired the zoological collection included 65,690 specimens, and the library had 2,000 volumes. He was succeeded as curator by Władysław Taczanowski.

Jarocki was the author of Zoologia czyli zwierzętopismo ogólne podług naynowszego systemu ułożone (1821).

In September 1828 he accompanied the 18-year-old Chopin to Berlin.

title: Feliks Paweł Jarocki


text:
User talk:Duncharris/archive5

At page load, it was -- T in UTC (see W3C Date and Time Formats)

Please leave your message at the bottom of the page. Duncharris 16:05, May 7, 2004 (UTC)

Archives

 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four

Jimmy arbitration
hi Dunc - saw your "arbcom committee is just having a coffee" remark - to be fair, they've just been in the process of finishing a couple of grueling arbitrations that involved more prominent articles & more frequent vandalism, so as annoying and repetitive as the JVT case is, I can see how it's not at the top of their list. I did drop a note to Fred Bauder though. ←Hob 17:01, 2004 Oct 21 (UTC)

 * Yes alright mate, I understand they do a difficult job, one that I wouldn't like to do, and I will apologise if anyone gets grumpy with me. I should have put a smiley in. :) Dunc|☺ 17:06, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

images
Okey I will put the resources of images. Dont worry I am good guy ;) (20:12, 21 Oct 2004 User:Onursendag)

Jimmy VanThach, Tran Van Ba, Carl Lindgren & co.
These people have been causing alot of trouble lately with all of their bizarre and ridiculous claims. I have studied Vietnamese history for years, and still have alot of respect for the traditional beliefs, even when the people in power often failed to live up to them. The really sickening thing is that this collection of nuts, who have been spamming the web like crazy with their silly claims, are always having events that fool decent, naive Vietnamese people out of their money. The only get support by handing out old Vietnamese titles (in English way) like Duke, Count, Baron & such nonsense and pretty medals, all of which were abolished at the end of the colonial era. If you do a web-search you will see they have posted copies of all these pages on every free on-line encyclopedia around and spammed every guestbook, message board and free "press release" site on the web.

I assure you, no one in the Vietnamese community takes these people seriously, most of them are not even Vietnamese but Americans given Vietnamese names & titles. Personally, I don't think it's entirely fair, but the fact is, as any history book will tell you, the Nguyen monarchy was very unpopular because of their long association with the French. Most people either hated them or felt that they simply didn't matter; they were puppets for the French regime.

User:NguyenHue

Dunc, I responded to the RFC on this disputed and have been trying to get my arms around it a bit. I don't know that all the articles they are posting are encyclopedic, but at Nguyen Phuc Buu Chanh, it appears to my disinterested eye that User:Jimmyvanthach might be acting in good faith. Tom - Talk 16:44, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * He responded positively to my request to please confine issue discussion to the article talk page. Tom - Talk
 * He has left the Nguyen Phuc Buu Chanh article empty of all controversial discussion to the point I was totally clueless why the article even existed. It was certainly not pushing a POV at this point.
 * He said he was off doing research. I consider that a good faith gesture. Tom - Talk

Now, User:NguyenHue edited what appeared to be a non-controversial article on Nguyen Phuc Buu Chanh recently to add a bunch of inflammatory and biased information. I think I should revert to the boring version, move the recent edits to the talk page, ask the parties to duke it out there, and protect the page until they both request at my user talk. Two questions for you. 1) Do you think that is a wise course? 2) Is that appropriate use of page protection? Tom - Talk 16:44, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

On second thought, I guess I better not protect yet. I will talk to both parties and see if vanilla article can remain for now until a compromise is reached. Tom - Talk 16:56, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * Are you saying User:NguyenHue's latest edits are good to be protected? They seem hasty and inflammatory.  The content might ought to stay as an explanation for the article, but you and I don't have the background or the inclination to sort through it all, so I thought the previous version might be better (it was a dry timeline of a guy's life).  Those latest edits are pretty rough looking. Tom - Talk 20:01, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I like your edits. I will try talking to Jimmy. Tom - Talk 20:12, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Dunc, I am ready to give an opinion to the arbitration committe on this. Tom - Talk 15:23, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

OK. Sounds good. I will support your nomination. Tom - Talk 22:24, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Lets research together
I am not aggressive, only trying to gain knowledge and facts, I have never bullied anyone here on Wikipedia.

Nguyen Hue, I have contacted senior member of the Royal Family of Vietnam Prince Nguyen Buu Phuc, and researched his contact information from The International Monarchist League,

VIETNAM

• Association de l'Imperiale Familie du Vietnam Arc-En-Ciel-Bellatrix, rue du Colonel Gassin, F-0600 Nice, France. Tel: +33 4 93851289 Contact: Prince Buu-Phuc

The link is: International Monarchist League Directory

Concerning Prince George Vinh San, can you provide me with his email address, or does he have a official statement online, or contact information, I would like to do some research on this and converse.

There is no holy war, only trying to get information for the biography, of Prince Buu Chanh and the Vientamese Imperial Family.

I just contacted Asian Scholar concerning Prince Buu Chanh and have researched I have researched this issue of the biography with *Dr. My-Van Tran an Asian Vietnamese Professor and confirmed the information please read her Scholar papers

I understand you have conflicting information, please provide some references you have to show that he is not a Prince, or he is Sir Buu Chanh ?

NB: That nonsense was User:Jimmyvanthach

 * I'm not going to bother with you. I have better things to do.  You're a aggressive pov-pushing crank, bugger off. Dunc|☺ 10:30, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Y-chromosomal Aaron
Hi Duncharris, what is POV about the present version of Y-chromosomal Aaron? When writing this up I made quite sure I reported as much serious criticism as possible. JFW | T@lk  14:05, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * I agree that the subject is somewhat esoteric, and smells of Bible Codes and other scientific "proofs" for Biblical phenomena. I'm not sure if there is more research going on at present. Thanks for rewriting the intro :-). JFW | T@lk  19:57, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

WP:RM
Hi, did you have a worked-through reason for inverting the order? We were using "add to the bottom", the same as WP:RfD, which has been that way for a long time, and works very smoothly; everyone (both there and on WP:RM) seems to like this. If you don't mind, I propose to put it back the way it was. Noel 15:57, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * Yeah, actually I had thought of that at some point. I had had to delete that link (earlier) because it wasn't working with the order the other way around. If we leave it this order, we'll have to put it back. Well, let me think about about this ordering issue for a bit - I'm sure my initial dismay was in good part because I do a lot of the admin work on RfD, and I'm so used to the other order used there. That order does have its advantages - it forces me to scroll past earlier entries and deal with them, instead of leaving them down the bottow where I can ignore them! :-) I'd be happy to do a lot of the admin work here too. (I guess you can't - you don't seem to be an admin yet - any particular reason, you have plenty of edits?) Anyway, let me think about the order. Also, I put a number of comments on WT:RM - did you have any reaction to them? Thanks! Noel 21:35, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Montreal move
I think your comment on WP:RM was humorous, but I'm not certain! Are you OK with the move? If so, I'll go ahead and make it happen. Thanks! Noel 04:47, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Vandalism
I noticed that you left a message on 205.188.116.146's talk page politely asking him/her to do experiments in the sandbox (to which he/she replied, "hell no"). Do you have some official status at Wikipedia or are you just another one of us common folk? I just corrected vandalism to the article on the iditarod done by 205.188.116.146 at 10:39, 17 Oct 2004. He/she deleted the entire article and replaced it with a monologue on animal rights. I left the monologue there since it is related to the original article but restored the original material, (although I think the monologue should be edited for brevity). I thought that perhaps 205.188.116.146 should get an official warning about vandalizing articles. Rsduhamel 22:41, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

John Vanbrugh
Hi, Dunc. Seeing that you recorded what you thought (”horrible, yuk!”) of the John Vanbrugh draft that was earlier nominated on FAC for a few hours, I was wondering if you might be interested in giving an opinion on the finished version that’s there now.--Bishonen 14:29, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Vietnamese Royal Succession
In the past, the throne was passed always to the oldest son as is common in most monarchies, but this was changed during the era of Thieu Tri so that the Emperor could choose a successor from his children; which actually turned out to be a bad idea really as upon his death there was soon an internal war between his oldest son, Crown Prince Hong Bao, and his chosen successor the Emperor Tu Duc. However, all heirs must be descendants of Emperor Minh Mang and usually age is given preference. Actually, through much of the Nguyen reign it was the French who picked the Emperor based on who they thought would be most cooperative.

The problem with Buu Chanh is that the only evidence of his ancestry comes from him himself, he claims to be a descendant of the Duke of Kien Hoa who was the 71st son of the Emperor Minh Mang. Even if this is true, it would only make him a very distant cousin of the last Emperor, Bao Dai, with literally hundreds of the exact same generational rank. Titles, whether of duke or prince or whatever where not inherited endlessly; given the size of the Imperial Family this would have been impossible -almost every Vietnamese alive would have a title. Only the Emperor could give someone a rank title like this and for Buu Chanh this would have been clearly impossible as he was born in 1942 and Emperor Bao Dai abdicated in 1945, after which time he would have no authority to do such, nor is there any evidence that he ever did.

The last Emperor of Vietnam, Bao Dai, reigned from 1926-1945 after which time he handed over his (already nominal) power to President Ho Chi Minh. He had 5 legitimate children, two of them sons, the oldest of which, Bao Long, was invested in the traditional was as Crown Prince of Vietnam in 1934 as an infant. This was not a very common practice but was done to avoid (get ready) any disputes over the succession due to the ugly rumors that Bao Dai had been illegitimate. To avoid this the full ceremony was held making Bao Long crown prince and heir to the throne. His position, which in any event is of purely historical/symbolic significance is accepted by his siblings. Bao Long has repeatedly refused to have anything to do with Buu Chanh as has the other children and grandchildren of the past emperors Duy Tan and Ham Nghi.

They have absolutely no legitimacy to be doing any of the things they have been doing. They have produced no evidence that Bao Dai bypassed his son in favor of this group, nor would it be possible to as Bao Dai had no authority to pass on to anyone, he had abdicated decades before and was in every way a common French citizen after that. NguyenHue 02:47, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)NguyenHue

Re: Sorting wiki syntax errors with bots:
Re: Sorting wiki syntax errors with bots:

I don't think it's particularly feasible, simply because a bot doesn't understand context, whereas a human does. For example, if a bot sees this "in [1902 the first steam and gas turbine]] was invented", what should it do? Should it make the whole thing a link by adding the missing bracket? I.e. "in 1902 the first steam and gas turbine was invented"? Or should it remove them all together? What about if it encounters "The integral of this equation is [0,9)" - what should it do this situation? Basically, it's far from trivial to make a bot that knows the right answers are "in 1902 the first steam and gas turbine was invented", but that the equation is right, and should just be enclosed in 'nowiki' tags ... humans on the other hand can work these out quite easily, as well as how to fix them. In short, humans do some things well, and software does some things well, and this is something that humans simply do better than software. All the best, -- Nickj 06:09, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * "The point is anyway to ask one of the better skilled programmers around here to see what they can do." For sure, let me know how you go! I'd be very interested to see how this problem is solved. All the best, -- Nickj 22:31, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

forgot about the orders
The only order (so far) that this Buu Chanh has deemed himself worthy to give out is the "Imperial Order of the Dragon of Annam", which is, to say the least, a bizzare choice for someone claiming to be a Vietnamese patriot. This was a French colonial order given out during the later half of the Nguyen reign when the Emperors were mere French puppets. It was and is regarded as a merit badge for French colonizers and their Vietnamese collaborators. Needless to say, Buu Chanh has no authority to award it at all. The Viet Emperor could, with the permission of the French President, but the order was abolished at the end of the colonial era and was replaced by the National Order of Vietnam which the former Emperor instituted when he returned to power as "Head of State" (Quoc Truong) of the French sponsored "State of Vietnam" (Quoc Gia Viet Nam) which existed from 1948-1955. The National Order was retained throughout the era of the American War by their client regime, the Republic of Vietnam (Viet Nam Cong Hoa).

If you can find some cached images old enough you can see on Buu Chanh's website that the first thing done after "restoring" this order was to hand them out like candy to some of his American sycophants who then tried to arrange order exchanges with some unsuspecting African ex-royals. It all stinks of a scam of "order collectors". NguyenHue 07:27, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)NguyenHue

2003 invasion of Iraq
Hi. I'm trying to figure out why you moved 2003 invasion of Iraq to 2003 Invasion of Iraq. I can't think of any reason to capitalize the I, very few Wikipedia articles use that form (the vast majority use the former, although there are many other variations, as well), and looking at google hits, lowercase seems to be far more commonly used on other sites/media. I also didn't see any proposal or discussion on the move at Talk:2003_Invasion_of_Iraq or Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Iraq war). Also, the first talk page points out that the l/c version is more consistent with U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Niteowlneils 22:26, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * OK. I can see that point, after all it is the Vietnam War, not "Vietnam war". And I certainly agree that we (I'm a life-long US citizen) shouldn't have attacked Iraq. All that said, I guess I'm mostly wondering if you would be troubled if I moved it back to the lowercase version (to be consistent with the Afghanistan article, if nothing else), at least until a 'formal' name for the invasion is established. Niteowlneils 17:54, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I have a question
Did you get my message? ---Rednblu | Talk 06:12, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

RfA
What the heck is up with people thinking a body can't be an admin if he or she has ever gotten exasperated? Not that I've been pushed hard enough, yet, to call someone a name, but that's because I'm chicken and don't correct the bad stuff that would lead me there. I suspect that's true of most of the people who are shocked -- just shocked! -- that you got put out enough with the king of Vietnam's retainers to use a naughty word. I know at least one person who keeps turning down RfA nomination attempts because he or she doesn't like the abasement of it. Not, of course, that one should be rude even to the rude and persistently destructive authors, but I worry about patterns rather than having a run-in too far. Geogre 19:49, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Exactly. I vote for everything that Geogre said.  ---Rednblu | Talk 22:50, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

/Admin enforcement requested
Effective 6 November 2004

"Edits by User Jimmyvanthach, User Celindgrenand and User Tran Van Ba and obvious sockpuppets to articles which relate to the former royal family of Vietnam or to the recent history and politics of Vietnam may be removed by any user."

Thought you'd like to know if you didn't already. There's a bit more as well. Cross-spammed to User talk:Hob. -- Cyrius|✎ 03:29, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * Yeah, I knew that was coming. The slightly annoying thing is that he's started behaving himself now, though I do not trust him and I do doubt the notabilty of some of his entries on advocacy groups, and there is something very dodgy going on with Buu Chanh. Dunc|☺ 12:11, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Congratulations
Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 22:33, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

In response to your question, yes I wrote Darwinian medicine and Darwinian happiness. I shall try to expand on the second enctrance (sometimes next week). BG

it's not original research
it is facts. i have been working WITH rednblue on creationist articles -- read up on my talk page and you'll read him congratulating me on doing a good job rehauling several pages. the article is pov right now. ID is much bigger than the institute. an article on the INSTITUTE should be about the institute. this is about ID, and it needs to fairly represent the breadth and depth of ID ideas, beyond the institute. Ungtss 18:05, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * i hearya ... at the same time, ID is ABOUT the bio stuff -- if you remove the bio, then you've portrayed it as a purely religious movement -- maybe it is a purely religious movement (or an argument from design, as you said) -- but maybe it isn't -- that's a pov question. but THEY don't think they're purely religious -- THEY think they're biologists, and they base their arguments on biology and biology alone -- they're not arguing for God at all.  God doesn't even enter into the discussion until farther down "the wedge."  so if you want to fairly portrary ID, you've got to have their BIOLOGY arguments right up front, i think.  wadduyasay?  Ungtss 18:16, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * sounds good ... so you'd like subpages on the actual ideas with brief summaries upfront? can we also subpage the stuff on the institute?  id IS much bigger than the institute ... in fact ... a lot of ID types think the institute's pretty wacked, and think the "wedge strategy" discredits all of id.  nice to meet you too, in a paddy-free environment:).  perhaps we should continue this on the article talkpage?  Ungtss 18:32, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * good deal -- mutual promise to always cite opposing viewpoints:). so the plan, as of now, is to subpage the biology arguments, and get all the institute stuff to the institute page?  what about the criticism?  right now, the page is 9/10 criticism, with virtually no representation of what ID actually IS.  if we're gonna have a long and detailed criticism on ID, we've gotta have a corresponding "description of and reasons for ID" section.  can we agree to make it no longer than the description of ID? Ungtss 19:01, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Your handling of Darwinian medicine and Darwinian happiness is fine with me. I would prefer 'Darwinian' from 'Evolutionary', but that may just be a personal bias. 'Evolutionary' is a more "open" word, for good and bad.

I am new to wikipedia, but I certainly appreciate the effort.

BG

List of publications in biology
Hi Duncharris,

Thanks for you contribution to the List of publications in biology. I tried to format the publication you added and add some more information to it. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with this topic. Why was this publication important? Can you write its description?

Thanks, APH 08:53, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Template:Disambig
Did you know that Template:Disambig is protected? We sysops are generally not supposed to edit protected pages. – Quadell (talk) (help)  18:24, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

Check out Protection policy. As you can see on the talk page and edit history, any changes to the look, style, or spacing on this template is bound to be controversial. It's best to discuss on Talk first and see if there's consensus for the change.

In this case, adding style information to the tag is counter-productive, since it has a class already. Style information should go in the class description at MediaWiki:Monobook.css so different browsers don't treat conflicting descriptors differently. Having this info in Monobook.css also allows a user to overwrite how it displays on his or her own browser, if he or she chooses to do so.

Incidentally, the page isn't protected to prevent vandalism; it's protected to prevent frequent changes, for server efficiency reasons. See, when one page gets changed, then the server cache for that one page has to be refreshed. No big deal. But when a template which is included on ten thousand pages gets changed, the server has to refresh the cashe on all those pages, which is a serious performance hit. And when there's an edit war on a page like this (which there has been, more than once), it makes Wikipedia noticeably slower for everyone. So protection makes sure this page is updated infrequently. – Quadell (talk) (help)  19:29, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

argh
How do you deal with creationists on wiki.. it's highly frustrating. -Fleacircus 00:15, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Vandal listing
Hi, Dunc. That rather clever verse at "May Sinclair" was totally original. One "Detective Drone" story was posted to BJAODN some time ago and another one came in just the other day. I think the guy's trolling to make the BJAODN page. - Lucky 6.9 19:51, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * Oh yes, took a google search to verify it was a sack of lies. I blocked him for 24 hours for calculated vandalism. Dunc|☺ 19:57, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Irish railways
Hi! I am at present bringing up to date the article entitled Rail transport in Great Britain. I am relatively new to Wikipedia, so at first was not aware that there are often parallel articles carrying bits of other articles or sometimes almost identical but with pieces missing from either one or the other. I now know better.

I have a good set of rail reference books ( including a whole run of Railway Magazine from 1921 onwards and the Railway Year Book for 1912), so can often supply quite particular facts and figures. You will see from the rail transport article that one of those mentioned is simply called Northern Counties Committee's lines and that will show what I submitted, using my books. Now I find that you also have an article entitled slightly differently, but with less information. That is of course not cross referred in the main article.

Can we merge the two? I am not sufficiently adept at doing that part of Wikipedia (I imagine it's fairly straightforward?) but I don't want to do it without asking first. Peter Shearan 10:29, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Another Pretender Page
Shwebomin

Unless Wikipedia is going to list every single nut that claims to be royalty and sells off titles to support themselves, some of this is really going to have to stop. The self-proclaimed "Crown Prince" Shwebomin of Burma is a particularly blatant case. His name is not even an actual name, and the last king of the kingdom he claims to be Crown Prince of died about a century before this guy was born (and with no sons). His case was discussed by the royalty experts at alt.talk.royalty here: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=38e9db65.0304291231.773625%40posting.google.com&rnum=2&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DBurma%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26group%3Dalt.talk.royalty%26selm%3D38e9db65.0304291231.773625%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D2 and the Oxford Union was worried he would ruin their reputation by speaking, as some might think they endorse his claim http://www.cherwell.org/?id=74 Further, at least one of the photos is "hot" and one of the external links is a rip off of the one right before it (obviously put down in hope that more links would = more credibility). I mentioned the clearly and easily proven ridiculousness of this case on the discussion page, but one seemed to notice, simply assuming that all the claims *must* be true. NguyenHue 02:41, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)NguyenHue

Why did you group all the pictures on Trofim Lysenko at the top of the page? I wouldn't even say anything except that I found it so inexplicable that it got the better of my curiosity. Everyking 02:48, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

contact mayor office of Westminster and U.S. Air War college in Alabama
-Surely being from Westminster, California, the largest Vietnamese Community in the world outside of Vietnam. I was present at the 2004 Westminster Vietnamese New Year Tet Parade, The Nguyen Dynasty consisting of Imperial Family members were apart of the parade and had a float included and was allowed by the City of Westminister.

-I myself saw Prince Buu Chanh and other members of the Royal Family and the Mayor of Westminster. The Nguyen Dynasty was awarded best float design by the City of Westminster for the 2004 Vietnamese New Year Tet Parade.

-The edit wars I see are former members Nguyen Trung De and Joseph Crisp from Texas personating as NguyenHue.

-I contacted U.S. Air War college in Alabama as "NguyenHue" suggested that he studied under Dr. Xiaoming Zhang. See >>[] <<

-The search person *Dr. Xiaoming Zhang

-Dr. Xiaoming Zhang had taught at Texas Tech University and Texas A&M International University.

-Joseph Crisp has been a student at Texas Tech University and Texas A&M International University and he is currently an expelled member by The Nguyen Dynasty.

-Information on his website also confirms his university affilation with the school.

-*About the Author Joseph Crisp

-It seems like a person as "Nguyen Hue aka Joseph Crisp" has been using a Vietnamese name here on wikipedia and claims to be an expert since he was banned from the Nguyen Dynasty, and now attacking them since his expulsion.

-I do not agree with person trying to mis-represent themselve and their bias against the Nguyen Dynasty because they were expelled.

Bnguyen 02:44, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

First of all, you seem to have way too much time on your hands, and the fact that one person posting on a free-encyclopedia sends you pretenders into such fits that you go trying to dig up dirt on anyone who disagrees with you should prove to anyone just how legitimate this group really is. As for these other people you claim I am (Nguyen Trung De or Joseph Crisp?) I studied under Dr. Zhang in Iowa, I have never been to Laredo in my life nor have I ever belonged to any political party (they're all after cash) and I'm certainly not a white catholic. You are clearly so desperate to promote yourself that you're grasping at straws. If you were as legitimate and exalted as you claim, "Wikipedia" would hardly be worth this much trouble. I can see now you should have been banned entirely to begin with, starting with the whole identity-theft thing. NguyenHue 03:39, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)NguyenHue

-I am not here assuming names and pretending I am a historical figure as you NguyenHue

-I have my name and photo available and my website

-Your tone and language towards me just proves you are bias expelled member from the Nguyen Dynasty

-I had seen the Royal Family and Prince Buu Chanh when they visited Westminster, California and my support for the Campaign election for Tran Thai Van.

-Assemblyman Tran Thai Van has met the Royal Family as well as the Mayor of Westminster.

-Your personal attacks on myself just because I have spoken up as a Vietnamese-American again shows your unprofessionalism as a so called historian. Bnguyen 04:59, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * Hello Jimmy. I see you're wasting everyone's time again... Dunc|☺ 11:22, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

-

NEGATIVE WORDS USED BY DUNCHARRIS AGAINST ME
This page is full of Jimmybullshit. Dunc|☺ 15:12, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

ATTENTION ADMIN
listen, do not bring my name into this to the nerve of you who leaves foul language against me this is uncalled for and negative here on wikipedia.

you are the one that had me requested to ban me from editing and providing information about Prince Nguyen Phuc Buu Chanh and any Vietnamese Royals.

I would like to have DUNCHARRIS banned for using vulgar language, he has used negative language as curse words, this is not acceptable and should not be tolerated.

he has accused me of causing problems, and I have not I have now moved on to give information on Laos Royals and Vietnamese Americans.

he has used non-official data and trusted a person by the name of NguyenHue "alias" who seems to have alternative motives as an ex-member.

look at the hateful languages NguyenHue "alias" used it can be seen that he is not non-neutral in his discussion

I see that now there is someone else that refruts the claims by NguyenHue alias.

so, I see you are causing problems again, trying to get me involved and you can see clearly now I AM ACTING IN GOOD FAITH by the Admin decision not to edit Vietnamese Royals or vietnamese History.

It can be seen now that Vietnamese who are aware of the Nguyen Dynasty are weighing in, and since NguyenHue is not getting his way, because he has his own opinion.

as I said and stated all along, he is giving his opinion and never provided a SINGLE BOOK OR REFERENCE that Prince Nguyen Phuc Buu Chanh is not a Royal in the Nguyen Dynasty.

so why dont you leave me alone before you get recommended to be banned for using FOUL language on here and that includes you also NGUYENHUE "alias".

you are not the owner here and I will provide the messages where you left negative comments to the admin if you continue. --Jimmyvanthach 18:56, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

---

This is going way too far
User bnguyen has been removing all edits to the pages of Vietnamese & southeast Asian royal pretenders showing their questionable legitimacy and doubts about their standing. I added these only after it was suggested on the Shwebomin talk page to do so. You know well the behavior of the others (actually all turned out to be jimmyvanthach who bnguyen may be as well) pushing these questionable individuals. Once again, there has been no credible evidence posted, nothing new that can be verified, just reverting back to all of the pages' 'jimmy versions'. Again, I find it highly unlikely that someone on the up and up would resort to this kind of lunacy over a free encyclopedia site.

However, what is most disturbing to me, as I have never been one to put information about myself on-line, is the attempt by jimmyvanthach, now taken up by bnguyen, to assert that I am an American college student who was removed/quit their farcial little group. bnguyen even claims to have contacted the college of an old professor of mine to find "proof" of my identity. I find this extremely offensive, not only to myself but to the other individuals whose names they have posted here when it is quite outside of the subject matter (the lack of proof of the claims of these individuals). Considering that accusations of identity-theft have already been made regarding this group, I take this very seriously. It is fear of this that has caused me to never put any personal info online. bnguyen has repeatedly posted my alleged "identity" on edit summaries (not talk pages where it could be refuted) and I consider this totally improper. Any discussion about me should be about what I have posted, about proving what claims have been made, not about who said what. It is unfair to me as well as to these other people who have nothing to do with editing wikipages. NguyenHue 05:51, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)NguyenHue

-Adding and making suggestions should only be based on cited material and non-inflamatory remarks

-The Comments you made are baseless and upon contacting the references you provided

-U.S. Air War college in Alabama as "NguyenHue" suggested See >>[] << that he studied under Dr. Xiaoming Zhang *Dr. Xiaoming Zhang.

-From the evidence Dr. Xiaoming Zhang had taught at Texas Tech University and Texas A&M International University.

-Joseph Crisp has been a student at Texas Tech University and Texas A&M International University and he is currently an expelled member by The Nguyen Dynasty.

-Joseph Crisp is also a expelled member of the Nguyen Dynasty and the Vietnamese Constitutional Monarchist League.

-You are assuming the name NGUYENHUE About the Author Joseph Crisp as to trick people here on wikipedia you are acting non-biased

-To Corroborate your Userpage to find out who you are shows bias, you have not once provided a cite that any of the Nguyen Royalty is a self Styled Pretender or Shwebomin.

-Bias by a member is very important you are putting your character and not acting in Good Faith

-If you can provide cite work to show of their non-royalty then provide it right here on this page.Bnguyen 00:45, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

You clearly don't know me from Adam, but whether I am Joe Six Pack, Harry, Moe or Curly is none of your damn business and has nothing to do with any of these articles and the POV you and your cohorts have been pushing. You're probably also the only one to think I am trying to make people "assume" I am Nguyen Hue, an 18th Century Historical figure. However, I'll give you people points for consistency, just like jimmyvanthach you have to keep bringing up other names to throw attention off the point of debate here (namely the lack of basis for practically every single post from this fringe group) and for making the absurd charge that anyone who doubts you're outrageous claims should have to find a scholarly journal soemwhere that says "Nguyen Buu Chanh is not royalty". The fact that you can produce no credible evidence is proof enough, the fact that an on-line encyclopedia is considered important enough to send you're little club into orbit is proof enough and the past actions of everyone from this group and their continued POV pushing is proof enough. From now on, I'm declaring myself the King of Tahiti until someone can provide a book saying I'm not. NguyenHue 07:23, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)NguyenHue

- If you care to read my user profile here on wikipedia Bnguyen I am not assuming any name and give factual statement about myself.

- -I had supported and campaigned for the election of Tran Thai Van for Republican Assemblyman in Califonia, which resulted in his win this past November 2004.

- The only contact I am aware of Prince Buu Chanh and the Nguyen Dynasty is when they came to Westminster, Orange County California, and I viewed them at the Vietnamese New Year Tet parade in Feb. 2004, they were awareded best Float design by the Mayor of Westminster.

-I am also aware that Assemblyman Tran Thai Van has also met Prince Buu Chanh, because I worked on the election campaign.

-The question I show is bias of your attempt to make negative words that without factual basis.

-I am not a member of the Vietnamese Constitutional Monarchist League or any political organization affilated with protesting the Vietnamse Government.

-I do however praise them to help my people that I felt are unjustly treated by the current Regime, and would like the United Nations to mandate control over the country and an election as in Cambodia.

-Using words as "fringe group", "little club into orbit is proof enough", "you and your cohorts have been pushing" and etc, is unfair.

-I have never used any terms only enlighten that your bias as an expelled member of the Nguyen Dynasty and that you are deceiving wikipedia of your suppose proof About the Author Joseph Crisp and that your supporter Nguyen Trung De show supporters of Resturants and local Vietnamese in towns in Texas:

-Supporters of Joseph Crisp and Nguyen Trung De

''-Contributors and Supporters of this Website: -Kong Jing Xue, Nguyen Trung De, Nguyen Van Tuan, Kong Zhishu, Nguyen Thi Linh, Ly Binh, Nguyen Thi -Diu, Pham Van Dao, Ni Su-tiao, Nguyen Dai Chinh, Ngo Van Hieu, Tran Huynh and Le Anh Dung. -Business and Community Support: -Little Saigon Resteraunt, Laredo TX; Ngay Nay gulf news Port Aransas TX, Nguyen Dynasty -Resteraunt,Galveston TX; Crisco Land Clearing Company, Artesia Wells TX; Crisp Conservation Service, -Cotulla TX; Confucian Temple of Woodward, TX; Lucky Eagle Casino, Kick-apoo, Eagle Pass TX; Confucian -Literary School, San Antonio TX; De and Sons Shrimp, Port Aransas TX.''

-It can be clearly seen that you dont have any Nguyen Dynasty Royal supporting you or has any affilation with you.

-So you need to come clean and state why you are your Group are trying to make un-factual claims without factual support, while esteemed indivduals in the U.S. Government, other Royal Families, and Vietnamese-Americans, other exile Vietnamse foreign Nations have shown support for the Nguyen Dynasty.Bnguyen 13:43, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * Yes Jimmy. We are dealing with you. Dunc|☺ 14:05, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

title: User talk:Duncharris/archive5


text:
Lake Aviemore

Lake Aviemore or Mahi Tikumu is a man-made lake in New Zealand's South Island, part of the Waitaki hydroelectric scheme. Immediately upstream is Lake Benmore and downstream Lake Waitaki. Aviemore lies on both sides of the border between the Waimate and Waitaki districts.

It is part of the traditional boundary of the Canterbury and Otago regions, although, officially, the border has been moved southward to include the lake, as well as the entire northwestern portion of the Waitaki District in the Canterbury Region. The Otematata settlement situated on State Highway 83 is just west of the lake, and was built in 1958 as a base for the construction of the Aviemore and Benmore Dams. Closer to the lake the old village Wharekuri which encompasses Aviemore was populous in the 1860s.

The Aviemore Dam, completed in 1968, is the newest of the three dams on the Waitaki river. It is made out of both earth and concrete.

By continuing the sinuous course of the river after the lake, one encounters Parsons Rock, named after Reverend J.C. Andrew (The Parson) who usually gave Christmas sermon there. A story goes to say that stolen gold taken from the Wharekuri Hotel was hidden near Parsons Rock. The suspects were to be apprehended but no money was ever found by the authorities in the hiding place.

In both Lake Aviemore and Benmore, one can fish salmon and trout year round except in September. Two main events are held on Lake Aviemore, there is the Labour weekend Aviemore Classic Trailer yacht race and the Windsurfing Championships in January.

title: Lake Aviemore


text:
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ludraman

Ludraman
(27/3/0) ended 11:25 28 October 2004 (UTC)'''

Ludraman, or John Collision has been here longer than I have, although due in part to poor internet access, he hasn't had as many edits as I have. His participation since he came back online, and since his last RFA request has increased significantly. I have never seen any controversial or dubious edits by Ludraman, and he has been a level-headed editor. Ludraman is of course, a fellow Irish Wikipedian, so I can't claim to be completely unbiased. His edit history however, and reputation should speak for themselves.

zoney ♣ talk 11:25, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * Thanks very much Zoney. Of course, I accept. J OHN C OLLISON [ Ludraman] 16:13, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) zoney ♣ talk 11:29, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Anárion 11:38, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) Happy to, particularly considering the opposition of the marauding edit counter. Ambi 13:44, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Filiocht 13:57, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC) Declaring an interest as a fellow Irish Wikipedian. Regardless of nationality, I consider him a hardworking contributor, despite the low number of edits (these things are relative, after all). His work setting up and supporting the Irish wikipedians' notice board is what sways me most.
 * 5) Of course. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 14:54, 2004 Oct 21 (UTC)
 * 6) Andre ( talk )A| 17:32, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) Acegikmo1 17:53, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Sarge Baldy 17:56, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC) A very sensible guy, and easily enough experience to be a safe administrator here.
 * 9) Support. Glad I wandered by this page and noticed his nomination.  He did good work on the Tutorial when we were first putting it together. Isomorphic 19:17, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) David Cannon 20:38, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC). Excellent candidate.
 * 11) Smart, level-headed, and well-tempered.  A good candidate. Jwrosenzweig 20:39, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. Hard-working, even-keeled and a true asset.  Even more so as an admin! - Lucky 6.9 20:43, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) ugen64 00:23, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) There is no Irish cabal.... ;-) func(talk) 01:06, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) Support. Reasonable looking edits, obviously intelligent and cool-headed. Jayjg 17:27, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) Is ea (support). Is é useadoir go han-mhaith. -- Decumanus 23:05, 2004 Oct 22 (UTC)
 * 17) Wolfman 06:49, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Has done lots of good work. No[[User_talk:norm|rm]] 10:13, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 19) Of course! --Lst27
 * 20) Tuf-Kat 01:21, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
 * 21) Admire his work on Sherlock Holmes stories and Irish topics. Support. ffirehorse 02:51, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 22) [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 18:32, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
 * 23) Fire Star 03:03, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 24) I've come across his work, and I consider Ludraman a competent editor. '''Support""". [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 09:28, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * 25) Very Verily 12:32, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 26) 172 08:44, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 27) Michael Snow 04:22, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 28) Yes indeed.  +sj +  21:24, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 29) Mackensen (talk) 01:47, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Oppose Fire Star 02:59, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC) Sorry, I put my support vote in the wrong column. Fire Star 03:03, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 1) Nothing personal - you don't quite meet my personal standards for supporting an admin candidate right now. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 13:34, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Too few edits. Passw0rd 12:53, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) * User has less than 100 (questionable) edits. Probable sock puppet. -- Netoholic @ 04:41, 2004 Oct 24 (UTC)
 * 4) Netoholic @ 04:41, 2004 Oct 24 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments:
 * 1481 edits since December 2003 for the curious.

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A. There seems to be a lack of sysops on VfD, so I would be happy to help out there, but the main thing would be dealing with vandalism. I still (though not as much of late) patrol the New Pages a lot and would help out there a good bit. I would be more than happy to help out with any other sysoppy things also if the need arose.
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. I feel my best contributions have been outside the main namespace, probably. As my poetic friend mentioned above, I started the Irish Wikipedians' notice board (I am suprised and delighted with how successful it turned out to be) and this has resulted in many spin-offs (I'm still wondring whether to take the imitators to court over trademark infringement :) and also am heavily involved with the Irish and Literature cotws. Of late, I have been doing a lot of catagorisation (such as the cities in spain - see Category:Cities of Spain). Check out my brag list on my user page for the articles I contributed to. Oh, and yes, I do graphs as well such as ones here and here.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
 * A. Like I said in my nomin, AFAIK the only conflict I've ever been in was over Irish breakfast. No-one got dragged into edit warring, instead we argued it around on the talk page, and the article after the conflict was better than the one before. Thanks for your time. J OHN C OLLISON [ Ludraman] 16:13, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)


text:
Category:Taxaceae

Genera and species in the conifer family Taxaceae and the closely related family Cephalotaxaceae.

title: Category:Taxaceae


text:
Martvili

Martvili (მარტვილი) is a small town in Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti province of Western Georgia. Its monastery was Samegrelo's clerical centre in the Middle Ages. Under Soviet rule, from 1936 to 1990, it was named Gegechkori after Sasha Gegechkori, an Old Bolshevik.

title: Martvili


text:
Feel the Magic: XY/XX

Feel the Magic: XY/XX, known in Japan as Kimi no Tame nara Shineru, "I would die for you" (きみのためなら死ねる) and in Europe and Australia as Project Rub, is a minigame video game compilation developed by Sonic Team and published by Sega for the Nintendo DS handheld game console. It was released in North America in November 2004, December 2004 in Japan, February 2005 in Australia, and March 2005 in Europe.

It follows the attempts of a young male protagonist trying to impress a young woman while being aided by a group of people known as the "Rub Rabbits". The game consists of a series of minigames in relation to the overall plot. These minigames are all controlled only by the Nintendo DS touch screen and microphone.

Plot
Feel the Magic: XY/XX follows the events of a young man who meets a girl and instantly falls in love; however, she is not nearly as receptive, and the protagonist attempts to win her over, ranging from romantic gestures to protecting her from a stampede of bulls. As he attempts this, he is assisted and cheered on by a group of men called the "Rub Rabbits"; however, he is also pursued by a romantic rival antagonist, vying for the girl's affection, using his incredible intelligence and technology to steal her from him.

Gameplay
Feel the Magic: XY/XX is played solely with the stylus and microphone, and features a voice recognition system through both speaking and breathing. It is composed of several minigames that are loosely linked, as the player tries to impress the girl.

There are three main modes of play. Story mode is the main mode which contains the minigames in each chapter with three levels of difficulty, 'Normal', 'Hard', and 'Hell'. Memories is a gameplay mode where one can play any of the previous minigames previously beaten. Stars can be collected in Memories, that can unlock certain pieces of clothing. The third mode, Maniac, is where one is able to take all the articles of clothing earned during the game to dress up the girl.

There are other features in the game. It can be played in English or Japanese, allowing it to be import friendly. 'Hidden Rabbits' can be collected in the cutscenes through Story mode, and after collecting enough, clothing can be unlocked. There are 60 Hidden Rabbits. After completing the game, the Sound Test is unlocked, where the sound effects and music can be listened to. Feel the Magic: XY/XX has automatic saves.

Development
In 2003, Sega dissolved United Game Artists (UGA), one of its internal game development studios. The head of the studio, Tetsuya Mizuguchi, left Sega that year to form Q Entertainment. Former members of UGA, such as Space Channel 5 veterans Takumi Yoshinaga and Takashi Yuda, were merged into Sonic Team. At Sonic Team, Yuda produced Sonic Riders, while Yoshinaga created Feel The Magic (as well as its prequel, The Rub Rabbits!). Development on the latter title began after Nintendo unveiled the Nintendo DS hardware, which features a touch screen that can be rubbed with a stylus. After observing that the word "rub" sounds similar to the word "love", Yoshinaga decided to create a game built around both concepts. A "love comedy story" was the basis for the title's plot; Yoshinaga chose to represent its characters with silhouettes to allow greater room for player interpretation. Although this subject matter was suggestive, Yoshinaga had no desire to include overtly sexual content, and considered the input of the predominantly female development team to avoid incorporating offensive material.

Feel the Magic: XY/XX was originally announced at E3 2004 under its code name, Project Rub. Then-executive managing director Yuji Naka said the title would place "an emphasis on controls using a Touch Screen, which will allow us to achieve the concept of 'rubbing,' a unique and fun gameplay mechanic made possible by the DS. We will investigate a wide-range of gaming elements unique to DS, so look forward to future Sega titles." Game details and previews came much later, in October.

Reception and legacy
The game received "generally favorable reviews" according to the review aggregation website Metacritic. In Japan, Famitsu gave it a score of one eight, one nine, one seven, and one nine for a total of 33 out of 40. It received a runner-up placements in GameSpot's 2004 "Best Puzzle/Rhythm Game" and "Most Innovative Game" award categories across all platforms, losing both to Katamari Damacy.

Author Torill Elvira Mortensen used Feel the Magic as a good example of a game that makes use of its respective console's technology. Torill noted that after its release, it was considered the best game for the Nintendo DS in terms of its utilization of the DS' touch screen and microphone. Torill also noted that its humour and its gameplay were appealing to reviewers.

The Times gave it all five stars and said that the game "makes no use of the DS’s wireless communication feature, so there is no multiplayer event. Still, this off-beat gem is a must-have game for any fledgeling DS collection." The New York Times gave it a favorable review and said that it "often lets you bypass annoying games in favor of entertaining ones, so the ratio of fun to aggravation is pretty good." However, The Sydney Morning Herald gave it three stars out of five, saying, "Completed mini-games can be played individually with increasing difficulty, but there is little long-term appeal once the delightfully barmy story has finished."

On February 2, 2006, the game won the "Best Concept" award at the 2006 Imagina Games Awards. Game Informer named the game one of the top ten weirdest of all time.

A prequel to Feel the Magic: XY/XX, titled The Rub Rabbits!, was released in Japan in 2005. Later it released in North America and Europe in 2006.

The color scheme along with the black and blue rabbits in the 2020 Nintendo 3DS title The Queen TV-Game 2 were inspired by the visual design of Feel the Magic: XY/XX.

title: Feel the Magic: XY/XX


text:
Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood

Robin Hood is a 1922 silent adventure film starring Douglas Fairbanks and Wallace Beery. It was the first motion picture ever to have a Hollywood premiere, held at Grauman's Egyptian Theatre on October 18, 1922. The movie's full title, under which it was copyrighted, is Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood. It was one of the most expensive films of the 1920s, with a budget estimated at one million dollars. The film was a smash hit and generally received favorable reviews.

Plot
The opening has the dashing Earl of Huntingdon besting his bitter enemy, Sir Guy of Gisbourne, in a joust. Huntingdon then joins King Richard the Lion-Hearted, who is going off to fight in the Crusades and has left his brother, Prince John, as regent. The prince soon emerges as a cruel, treacherous tyrant. Goaded on by Sir Guy, he usurps Richard's throne. When Huntingdon receives a message from Lady Marian Fitzwalter, his love interest, telling him of all that has transpired, he requests permission to return to England. King Richard assumes that the Earl has turned coward and denies him permission. The Earl seeks to leave in spite of this, but is ambushed by Sir Guy and imprisoned as a deserter. Upon escaping from his confines, he returns to England, endangering his life and honor, to oppose Prince John and restore King Richard's throne. He finds his friends and himself outlawed and Marian apparently dead.

Huntingdon returns to Nottingham and adopts the name of Robin Hood, acrobatic champion of the oppressed. Leading a band that steals from the rich to give to the poor, including Friar Tuck, Little John, Will Scarlet, and Allan-a-Dale, he labors to set things right through swashbuckling feats and makes life miserable for Prince John and his cohort, the high sheriff of Nottingham. After rescuing Marian from Prince John's prison and defeating Sir Guy in a final conflict, Robin is captured. The timely reappearance of King Richard returns him to Marian and foils the efforts of Prince John.

Cast

 * Douglas Fairbanks as Earl of Huntingdon/Robin Hood (Fairbanks's custom was to place his name last.)
 * Wallace Beery as King Richard the Lion-Hearted
 * Sam De Grasse as Prince John
 * Enid Bennett as Lady Marian Fitzwalter
 * Paul Dickey as Sir Guy of Gisbourne
 * William Lowery as The High Sheriff of Nottingham
 * Willard Louis as Friar Tuck
 * Alan Hale as The Squire/Little John
 * Bud Geary as Will Scarlet
 * Lloyd Talman as Allan-a-Dale
 * Billie Bennett as Servant to Lady Marian

Wallace Beery played King Richard the Lion-Hearted again the following year in a sequel called Richard the Lion-Hearted.

Alan Hale, Sr., made such an impression as Little John in this film that he reprised the role 16 years later in The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938) opposite Errol Flynn, then played the character again in Rogues of Sherwood Forest in 1950, 28 years after his initial performance in the original Fairbanks film.

Production
A huge castle set and an entire 12th-century village of Nottingham were constructed at the Pickford-Fairbanks Studio in Hollywood. Some sets were designed by architect Lloyd Wright. Director Allan Dwan later recalled that Fairbanks was so overwhelmed by the scale of the sets that he considered cancelling production at one point. The castle was largely built of wood, wire, and plaster. The exceptions were the concrete floor and the (wood-covered) steel drawbridge.

The story was adapted for the screen by Fairbanks (as "Elton Thomas"), Kenneth Davenport, Edward Knoblock, Allan Dwan, and Lotta Woods, and was produced by Fairbanks for his own production company, Douglas Fairbanks Pictures Corporation, and distributed by United Artists, a company owned by Fairbanks, his wife Mary Pickford, Charlie Chaplin, and D. W. Griffith. This swashbuckling adventure was based on the legendary tale of the medieval hero, Robin Hood, and was the first production to present many of the elements of the legend that became familiar to movie audiences in later versions, although an earlier treatment had been filmed a decade before in the woods around Fort Lee, New Jersey, featuring even more flamboyant costumes than the Fairbanks version.

Score
At its premiere, Robin Hood was accompanied by an orchestral score especially commissioned by Fairbanks and composed by Victor Schertzinger. That score has also been adapted and conducted live by U.S. composer Gillian Anderson. Though the film has received many live and recorded scores since its first release, perhaps the two most significant are further orchestral scores written in 2007 by American composer and conductor John Scott, and in 2016 by eminent British silent film musician Neil Brand.

Reception

Robin Hood generally received favorable reviews. It received an aggregate score of 100% and an average rating of 8.4/10 from Rotten Tomatoes based on 10 reviews. Combustible Celluloid's Jeffrey M. Anderson rated the movie 4 stars out of 4, concluding "Director Allan Dwan had worked with Fairbanks on several two-reelers, and would go on to direct his last silent film, The Iron Mask (1929). Dwan would continue working, making "B" pictures up until the 1960s, and finishing up with something like 500 films on his resume before he died. But Robin Hood is his masterpiece.".

Fairbanks biographer Jeffrey Vance evaluated the film in 2008 as follows: "Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood is the most important legacy of the rich life and career of Douglas Fairbanks. The towering sets are long gone, and the characters have been reimagined and reinterpreted, but the foundation the film was built upon—and the culture it created—exists to this day....The creation of Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood consumed nearly a year of his life, and the experience established the matrix for all of his subsequent silent film productions. Indeed, it was the first of his productions to be fully realized in every respect."

title: Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood


text:
2-6-0

Under the Whyte notation for the classification of steam locomotives, 2-6-0 represents the wheel arrangement of two leading wheels on one axle, usually in a leading truck, six powered and coupled driving wheels on three axles and no trailing wheels. This arrangement is commonly called a Mogul.

Overview
In the United States and Europe, the 2-6-0 wheel arrangement was principally used on tender locomotives. This type of locomotive was widely built in the United States from the early 1860s to the 1920s.

Although examples were built as early as 1852–53 by two Philadelphia manufacturers, Baldwin Locomotive Works and Norris Locomotive Works, these first examples had their leading axles mounted directly and rigidly on the frame of the locomotive rather than on a separate truck or bogie. On these early 2-6-0 locomotives, the leading axle was merely used to distribute the weight of the locomotive over a larger number of wheels. It was therefore essentially an 0-8-0 with an unpowered leading axle and the leading wheels did not serve the same purpose as, for example, the leading trucks of the 4-4-0 American or 4-6-0 Ten-Wheeler types which, at the time, had been in use for at least a decade.

The first American 2-6-0 with a rigidly mounted leading axle was the Pawnee, built for heavy freight service on the Philadelphia & Reading Rail Road. In total, about thirty locomotives of this type were built for various American railroads. While they were generally successful in slow, heavy freight service, the railroads that used these first 2-6-0 locomotives didn't see any great advantages in them over the 0-6-0 or 0-8-0 designs of the time. The railroads noted their increased pulling power, but also found that their rather rigid suspension made them more prone to derailments than the 4-4-0 locomotives of the day. Many railroad mechanics attributed these derailments to having too little weight on the leading truck.

The first true 2-6-0s were built in the early 1860s, the first few being built in 1860 for the Louisville and Nashville Railroad. The new design required the use of a single-axle swiveling truck. Such a truck was first patented in the United Kingdom by Levi Bissell in May 1857.

In 1864, William S. Hudson, then the superintendent of Rogers Locomotive and Machine Works, patented an equalized leading truck that was able to move independently of the driving axles. This equalized suspension worked much better over the uneven tracks of the day. The first locomotive built with such a leading truck was likely completed in 1865 for the New Jersey Rail Road and Transportation Company as their number 39.

The locomotive class name likely derives from a locomotive named Mogul, built by Taunton Locomotive Manufacturing Company in 1866 for the Central Railroad of New Jersey. However, it has also been suggested that it derived from the British 2-6-0 engine of that name, the prototype of its class, built by Neilson and Company for the Great Eastern Railway in 1879.

Australia
Beyer, Peacock & Company provided large numbers of standard design narrow gauge Mogul locomotives to several Australian Railways. Users of the Mogul type include the South Australian Railways with its Y class, the Tasmanian Government Railways with its C class, the Western Australian Government Railways with its G class (in a 4-6-0 configuration as well) and numerous private users. The SAR also purchased 8 examples of the type built by Baldwin which became the X class. The New South Wales Government Railways had a number of mogul types starting from the 1880s, forming the Z21, Z22, Z24, Z25 and Z27 classes.

Belgian Congo
Twenty 2-6-0 locomotives were built by Les Ateliers de Tubize locomotive works in Belgium for the  CF du Congo Superieur aux Grands Lacs Africains (CFL) between 1913 and 1924. The first eight, numbered 27 to 34, were built in 1913, followed by six more in 1921, numbered 35 to 40. Six more of a slightly larger version followed in 1924, numbered 41 to 46. They had 360 by cylinders and 1050 mm diameter driving wheels, with the smaller versions having a working order mass of 28.8 t and the larger versions 33.4 t. Most of the CFL was regauged to gauge in 1955, as were all of the serving Moguls. Most of them still survived in 1973.

Canada
A large number of 2-6-0 locomotives were used in Canada, where they were considered more usable in restricted spaces, being shorter than the more common 4-6-0 Ten-Wheelers. Canadian National (CN) had several. One of them, the CN no. 89, an E-10-a class locomotive built by Canadian Locomotive Company in 1910, has been owned and operated since 1972 by the Strasburg Rail Road in Pennsylvania in the US, in conjunction with the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania.

A well-preserved version, the White Pass and Yukon Route No. 51, can be found at the MacBride Museum of Yukon History in Whitehorse, Yukon.

Finland
Finland's 2-6-0 locomotives were the Classes Sk1, Sk2, Sk3, Sk4, Sk5 and Sk6.

Finnish Steam Locomotive Class Sk1s were built from 1885 by Swiss Locomotive & Machine Works. They carried numbers 117 to 131, 134 to 149, 152 to 172 and 183 to 190. These locomotives were nicknamed Little Brown.

Class Sk2 locomotives were numbered 196 to 213, 314 to 321 and 360 to 372. They were built by Tampella. No. 315 is preserved at Tampere in Tampella.

Finnish Steam Locomotive Class Sk3s were built from 1903 by ''Tammerfors Linne & Jern Manufakt. A.B.'' They were numbered 173 to 177, 191 to 195, 214 to 221, 334 to 359, 373 to 406 and 427 to 436. These locomotives were nicknamed Grandmothers.

Indonesia
The State Railway Company of the Dutch East Indies (Staatsspoorwegen, SS) in Indonesia operated 83 units of 2-6-0 tank locomotives of the C12 series, built by Sächsische Maschinenfabrik of Chemnitz, Germany in 1896. They were wood-burning locomotives which consumed two cubic metres of wood and 3500 L of water for 4½ hours of steam production.

Of these locomotives, 43 survived the invasion by Japan during the Second World War and were still being operated following independence from the Netherlands. They were based in Cepu in Indonesia and were used on the Cepu-Blora-Purwodadi-Semarang-Bojonegoro-Jatirogo route, now closed.

By the early 1980s, the survivors of the class were in poor condition. One example, C1218 no. 457, was revived in 2002 after twenty-five years, in Ambarawa motive power depot. By mid-2006 it was operational, and since 2009 it was moved to Surakarta, Central Java to haul a chartered steam train across the main street of the heart of Surakarta, named Jaladara.

Ireland
Several 2-6-0 locomotive classes found usage on Ireland’s railways, mainly with freight trains. The first of these would be the Great Southern and Western Railway Class 355, which were originally built by the North British Locomotive Company as an 0-6-0 type in 1903, but later rebuilt into 2-6-0s after problems occurred; they were soon supplemented with the similar Class 368. Some of these locomotives were converted to oil firing and one even for peat-burning.

Later classes of 2-6-0 include the Dublin and South Eastern Railway nos. 15 and 16 (with no. 15 being preserved), and the Great Southern Railways Classes 372 and 393, the latter of which were based on the British SECR N Class.

Italy
The Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane came to operate more than 500 2-6-0 locomotives of the Class 625 for mixed traffic and the Class 640 for light passenger trains. These locomotives, nicknamed Little Ladies (Signorine), were very successful and several were preserved after the end of regular steam services, with some still operational for heritage trains.

New Zealand
The Class J of the New Zealand Railways Department (NZR) was its pioneering tender freight locomotive, introduced in 1877 for use in the re-gauged Canterbury region of the South Island. Built by the Avonside Engine Company and other locomotive works in England, they were shipped to New Zealand in kit form. They eventually served all over New Zealand's fledgling rail network on both islands. In time, they were replaced on mainline running as larger power arrived. Many survived into the 1920s as yard shunters and some were converted to tank locomotives.

Cape gauge
In 1876 and 1877, the Cape Government Railways (CGR) placed eighteen Mogul locomotives in freight service on the Cape Western system, built by Beyer, Peacock & Company and the Avonside Engine Company. They were designated 1st Class when a classification system was adopted. By 1912, three of them survived to be considered obsolete by the South African Railways (SAR), designated Class 01 and renumbered by having the numeral 0 prefixed to their existing numbers. All were withdrawn from service by 1916.

Also in 1876, the CGR placed a pair of Stephenson's Patent back-to-back Mogul type side-tank locomotives in service on the Cape Midland system, built by Kitson & Company. They were later separated and rebuilt to saddle-tank locomotives for use as shunting engines. When a classification system was introduced, they were designated 1st Class.

In 1876 and 1877, the CGR placed eight Mogul tender locomotives in service on the Cape Midland system, also built by Kitson & Company. They were all eventually rebuilt to saddle-tank locomotives for use as shunting engines. When a classification system was adopted, they were also designated 1st Class.

In 1877, Whythes & Jackson Limited, contracted by the Natal government for the construction of the line from Durban to Pietermaritzburg, took delivery of two 2-6-0 tank locomotives from Kitson & Company for use during construction. The locomotives were not numbered, but were appropriately named Durban and Pietermaritzburg after the two towns which were to be connected by the new railway. Upon completion of the construction contract at the end of 1880, the locomotives were taken over by the Natal Government Railways (NGR) and in 1893 they were sold to the Selati Railway.

In 1877 and 1878, seven Mogul tank locomotives were also delivered to the NGR by BP, built to the same design as the two contractor's locomotives. Later classified as NGR Class K, they were the first locomotives to be ordered for use on the then newly laid Cape gauge Natal mainline into the interior. One was sold to the East Rand Proprietary Mines and two came into SAR stock in 1912, but remained unclassified as "NGR 2-6-0T Beyer Peacock Sidetank". Although they were considered obsolete, they remained in service as late as 1931.

In 1879 and 1880, the CGR placed ten Moguls, built by Beyer, Peacock and Company, in freight service on the Cape Western system. While similar to the locomotives of 1876, their cylinders were mounted at a downward inclination towards the driving wheelset. They were also designated 1st Class when a classification system was adopted on the CGR.

In 1879, the NGR placed seven 2-6-0T locomotives in service. They were subsequently modified to a 4-6-0T wheel arrangement and were designated NGR Class G. In 1912, when fifteen of them were assimilated into the South African Railways, they were renumbered and reclassified to Class C.

In 1891, the CGR placed two Baldwin-built 2-6-0 Mogul locomotives in freight service, the first American locomotives to enter service in South Africa. They were originally designated 5th Class, but the classification was later changed to 1st Class. One of them still survived in 1912 and was also designated Class 01 by the SAR. It was withdrawn from service in 1920.

In 1900, while the Second Boer War was still in progress, four 2-6-0T locomotives arrived in the Cape Colony, built by the Dickson Manufacturing Company in 1899. Since they bore cab side-plates inscribed "SS-ZAR" and were named J.S. Smit, J.J. Spier, L.S. Meyer and C. Birkenstock, they were intended for the Netherlands-South African Railway Company (NZASM) in the Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek (ZAR). They were diverted to Indwe Collieries in the Cape Colony and when the CGR later took control of the colliery line, these locomotives were classified as part of the CGR 3rd Class. All four survived to come into SAR stock in 1912, when they were classified as Class O3. They were withdrawn by 1915.

Also in 1900, two Mogul saddle-tank locomotives entered shunting service at the Port Elizabeth Harbour, followed by one more in 1903.

In 1902, the Zululand Railway Company, contractors for the construction of the North Coast line from Verulam to the Tugela River, acquired two 2-6-0 tender locomotives as construction engines. Upon completion of the line in 1903, the locomotives were taken onto the roster of the Natal Government Railways and designated Class I.

Between 1902 and 1904, eleven Mogul saddle tank locomotives, built by Hunslet Engine Company, were delivered to the Table Bay Harbour Board. All were taken onto the Cape Government Railways roster in 1908 and came into SAR stock in 1912, but were considered obsolete and remained unclassified.

Narrow gauge
In 1902, the CGR placed three locomotives with a Mogul wheel arrangement in service on the Hopefield narrow gauge branch line that was being constructed from Kalbaskraal. They were built by Baldwin and were of a standard type that was being used on the narrow gauge railroads of Maine in the US. A fourth locomotive, identical to the first three, was ordered from the same manufacturer in 1911. In 1912, when these locomotives were assimilated into the South African Railways, they were renumbered with an "NG" prefix to their running numbers. When a system of grouping narrow gauge locomotives into classes was eventually introduced somewhere between 1928 and 1930, they were to be classified as Class NG7 but had already been withdrawn from service.

United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, where locomotives are generally smaller than in the US, the 2-6-0 was found to be a good wheel arrangement for mixed-traffic locomotives.

Circa 1870, one 2-6-0T engine was built for the Garstang and Knot-End Railway. The first unsuccessful examples were fifteen locomotives built to a design of William Adams for the Great Eastern Railway in 1878–79.

The Midland and South Western Junction Railway acquired two examples built to an Australian design by Beyer, Peacock and Company in 1895 and 1897.

A long strike by workers throughout the British engineering industry in 1898/1899 led to a backlog of locomotive orders. This led leading British companies to place orders with American builders for standard light general-purpose locomotives adapted to British requirements. In 1899, the Midland Railway (MR), the Great Northern Railway (GNR) and the Great Central Railway (GCR) all purchased examples from the Baldwin Locomotive Works in the US. The MR also bought ten from Schenectady Locomotive Works at the same time. In the United States, the 2-6-0 was already the common design for this sort of engine, and these imports were to be very influential in introducing the wheel arrangement to the United Kingdom.

At the time of the Grouping in 1923, 2-6-0 locomotives were already operated by the Great Western Railway (2600 and 4300 classes of 1900 and 1911 respectively), the Caledonian Railway (34 class, 1912), the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway (K class, 1913), the Glasgow and South Western Railway (403 class, 1915), the GNR (H2, H3 and H4 classes, 1920), and the South Eastern and Chatham Railway (N class, 1922).

Several of these designs continued to be built by the Big Four after 1923, and several new and successful designs were introduced so that the 2-6-0 became the principal type for medium-loaded mixed-traffic duties. Notable new designs included the London Midland & Scottish Railway’s Hughes Crab (1926), the Southern Railway's U class (1928), the Stanier Mogul (1934), the Ivatt class 2 (1946), the Ivatt class 4 (1947), the London and North Eastern Railway’s class K4 (1937) and the Thompson/Peppercorn K1 class which were built in 1949–50 after the nationalisation of British Railways.

British Railways continued to build the Ivatt and Thompson/Peppercorn designs and then introduced three standard designs, based on the Ivatt classes. These were the Standard class 2 in 1952, the Standard class 4 in 1952 and the Standard class 3 in 1954. 2-6-0 locomotives continued to be built until 1957 and the last ones were withdrawn from service in 1968.

United States
The first true 2-6-0s with single-axle swivelling leading trucks were built in the United States in 1860 for the Louisville and Nashville Railroad. The New Jersey Locomotive and Machine Company built their first 2-6-0 in 1861, as the Passaic for the Central Railroad of New Jersey. The Erie Railroad followed in 1862 with the first large order of this locomotive type. In 1863, Rogers Locomotive & Machine Works built more for the New Jersey Railroad and Transportation Company.

The Baltimore & Ohio (B&O) no. 600, a 2-6-0 Mogul built at the B&O's Mount Clare Shops in 1875, won first prize the following year at the 1876 Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia. It is preserved at the B&O Railroad Museum, housed in the former Mount Clare shops in Baltimore.

Well over 11,000 Moguls were constructed in the United States by the time production had ended in 1910. Very few of these classic steam locomotives still exist, most of them having been scrapped as newer, faster and more powerful steam engines were developed in the twentieth century. The USRA standard designs of 1918 did not include a 2-6-0.

Five notable 2-6-0 locomotives are still in operation in the United States.
 * Southern Pacific No. 1744 has spent more time out of service than it did under its own power in the preservation era. It is now being planned to operate on the Niles Canyon Railway in Sunol, California.
 * Ex New Berlin & Winfield Railroad No. 2, built by the Baldwin Locomotive Works in 1906, was rebuilt and is maintained by the Midwest Central Railroad.
 * Walt Disney World Railroad (WDWRR) No. 2 Lilly Belle, built in September 1928 by the Baldwin Locomotive Works as No. 76 (later No. 260) for the United Railways of Yucatan in Mexico, operates on the railroad circling the Magic Kingdom in Orlando, Florida since 1 October 1971. Due to mechanical problems, this locomotive was shipped to the Strasburg Rail Road for an extensive overhaul in 2010. In late July 2016, it returned to the Magic Kingdom and resumed service on November 23, 2016.
 * Ex Canadian National No. 89 operates in excursion service on the Strasburg Rail Road.
 * Everett Railroad No. 11 operates tourist trains on the Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania based shortline.

Preserved non-operating examples include:
 * The Southern Pacific No. 1785, located in Woodburn, Oregon.
 * The Southern Pacific No. 1774, located in Globe, Arizona. Retired early/mid 1950s.
 * The Virginia & Truckee Railroad No. 13, Empire at the California State Railroad Museum in Sacramento, California.
 * The Duluth & Iron Range Railroad No. 3 in Two Harbors, Minnesota.
 * The Boston & Maine Railroad No. 1455 at the Danbury Railway Museum in Danbury, Connecticut. This was the last steam locomotive to regularly operate on the Boston & Maine Railroad in 1956.
 * The Magma Arizona Railroad No. 6 at the McCormick-Stillman Railroad Park in Scottsdale, Arizona was built in October 1907 and operated until 1960.

title: 2-6-0


text:
David Carson (graphic designer)

David Carson (born September 8, 1955) is an American graphic designer and design director.

Early life and career
Carson was born on September 8, 1955, in Corpus Christi, Texas. Graduating from Rolling Hills High School, he continued his education and graduated from San Diego State University with a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology. Carson surfed professionally before finding employment with magazine Self and Musician. He then moved on to work at Transworld Skateboarding for four years, and was then hired as an art director at Beach Culture in 1989. Three years later Carson was hired by Ray Gun, where he stayed for three years. He later created his own design firm (David Carson Design).

Carson received the AIGA medal in 2014.

title: David Carson (graphic designer)


text:
Talk:2-6-0

Delisted
Lack of inline quotes. Arguably lacking broad coverage. --Ling.Nut 21:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1waTg6CNnU
 * In 2-6-0 on 2011-05-25 06:55:15, 404 Not Found
 * In 2-6-0 on 2011-06-10 04:41:33, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:2-6-0


text:
Kynaston

Kynaston is both a surname and a given name. Notable people with the name include:

Surname:
 * Sir Roger Kynaston, 15th-century English knight
 * David Kynaston, English historian and author
 * Edward Kynaston, English actor
 * Francis Kynaston, English courtier and poet
 * Francis Kynaston (died 1590), MP
 * Humphrey Kynaston, English highwayman who operated in the Shropshire area
 * (* 1941), English organist

Given name:
 * Kynaston Reeves, also known as Philip Arthur Reeves, English actor
 * Kynaston Studd, known as "JEK", British cricketer and businessman

title: Kynaston


text:
Talk:2-6-0/to do

 * Add a photo of a 2-6-0
 * Expand on the technical details of the locomotive type
 * List the last-built example of this type
 * Use of the Mogul type outside the US: popular in Britain, for example.

title: Talk:2-6-0/to do