text: Template:RQ:pl:Zabł. Zabob.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zabł. Zabob.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zabor. W kniei

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zabor. W kniei


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zabor. A. Wojna

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zabor. A. Wojna


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zachar. Człow.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zachar. Człow.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zachar. Jarema

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zachar. Jarema


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zachar. Kres.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zachar. Kres.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zag. Chochl.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zag. Chochl.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zah. Matejko

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zah. Matejko


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zaiks

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zaiks


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zającz. Orient

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zającz. Orient


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zakrz. S. Rzuty

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zakrz. S. Rzuty


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zakrz. S. Skoki

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zakrz. S. Skoki


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zakrz. St. Zagadn.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zakrz. St. Zagadn.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zakrz. W. Reform.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zakrz. W. Reform.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Frag.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Frag.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Jamby

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Jamby


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Mowa

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Mowa


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Różne

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Różne


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Wigilia

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Wigilia


text:
Паша Мерседес

Etymology
Called so due to Pavel owning various expensive cars of the Mercedes brand.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Metropolitan Pavel, the  of the

title: Паша Мерседес


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Zbar.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Zbar.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Złota

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Boh. Złota


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Br. Czart.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Br. Czart.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Br. Litw.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Br. Litw.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Br. Zniesienie

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Br. Zniesienie


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. K. Friebe

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. K. Friebe


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. K. Górą

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. K. Górą


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. K. Nasi

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. K. Nasi


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. K. Ślub.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. K. Ślub.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. M. Pam.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. M. Pam.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Marc. Wspom.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. Marc. Wspom.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. W. Broń

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. W. Broń


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. W. Traktory

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zal. W. Traktory


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zaliw. Krzewy

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zaliw. Krzewy


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zamł. Mech.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zamł. Mech.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zamoy. Przepr.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zamoy. Przepr.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Czworo

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Czworo


text:
Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Drob.

{{#invoke:quote|call_quote_template }}
 * pl|author=Gabriela Zapolska|title=Pisma wybrane|section=Drobne utwory|year_published=195}|volume=3|textparam=1|t=
 * propagateparams=year,page,pages
 * allowparams=2

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Drob.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Dul.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Dul.


text: kropila

title: kropila


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Kaśka

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Kaśka


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Krzyż

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Krzyż


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Malicz

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Malicz


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Mił.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Mił.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Modl.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Modl.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Pam.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Pam.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Ptak

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Ptak


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Znak

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Znak


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Żab

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. G. Żab


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. H. Dubelt.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zap. H. Dubelt.


text: kropiło

title: kropiło


text: kropiła

title: kropiła


text: Pall Malls

title: Pall Malls


text: Category:Naga Pidgin terms borrowed from Hindi


text:
Canon's Marsh

Proper noun

 * , between the city centre and the.

title: Canon's Marsh


text: Category:Liangmai Naga terms borrowed from Naga Pidgin


text:
ուղղանկյուն

Etymology
..

Adjective

 * 1) right-angled
 * 2) rectangular

Noun

 * 1) rectangle

title: ուղղանկյուն


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zapał. Pam.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zapał. Pam.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Chusta

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Chusta


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Grusze

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Grusze


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Ludzie

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Ludzie


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Ślad.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Ślad.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Traktor

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Traktor


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Wędr.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Wędr.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Ziarno

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zar. Ziarno


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zarus. Jacht.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zarus. Jacht.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zarus. Żegl.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zarus. Żegl.


text:
רבוה

Etymology
, from.

title: רבוה


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawadz. Technol.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawadz. Technol.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawadz. Wiad. X

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawadz. Wiad. X


text: sheconomies

title: sheconomies


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawadz. W. Sob.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawadz. W. Sob.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawan. Wilanów

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawan. Wilanów


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawidz. Wspom.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawidz. Wspom.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Droga

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Droga


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Mąż

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Mąż


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Mił.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Mił.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Noc

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Noc


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Not.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Not.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Ocal.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Ocal.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Owoc

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Owoc


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Pok.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Pok.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Rozdr.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. Rozdr.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawiey. w: Tyg. Powsz. 1, 1950


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zawist. Poezje

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zawist. Poezje


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zdrowie Publ.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zdrowie Publ.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zdziar. Pierw.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zdziar. Pierw.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Dom

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Dom


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Dziewan.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Dziewan.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Powsin.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Powsin.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Uśm.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Uśm.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Zmory

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zeg. Zmory


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zesz. Wrocł.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zesz. Wrocł.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. A. Okręt

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. A. Okręt


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel.G. Kirgiz

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel.G. Kirgiz


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel.G. Poezje

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel.G. Poezje


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. S. Dno

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. S. Dno


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. S. Ost.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. S. Ost.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. S. Pol.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. S. Pol.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. S. Świt.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. S. Świt.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Grec. niepódl.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Grec. niepódl.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Grec. powsz.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Grec. powsz.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Kult. ant.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Kult. ant.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Rzym.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Rzym.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Świat

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. T. Świat


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. W. Wspom.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziel. W. Wspom.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zieleń. Ust.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zieleń. Ust.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zielon. Wspom.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zielon. Wspom.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zielon. L. Wspom.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zielon. L. Wspom.


text:
դերնախագահ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) vice-president

title: դերնախագահ


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziem. Myśli

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziem. Myśli


text: Template:RQ:pl:Ziemia

title: Template:RQ:pl:Ziemia


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zienk. Wiecz.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zienk. Wiecz.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zmor. Podania

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zmor. Podania


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zmor. Poezje

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zmor. Poezje


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zoll Prawo cyw.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zoll Prawo cyw.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zonn Astr.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zonn Astr.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zonn Gwiazd.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zonn Gwiazd.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zubrz. Cieśl.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zubrz. Cieśl.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Zwierc.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Zwierc.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Źródła energii

title: Template:RQ:pl:Źródła energii


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żab. Któż

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żab. Któż


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żab. Rodz.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żab. Rodz.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żab. Tygr.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żab. Tygr.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żab. Z dołu

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żab. Z dołu


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żel. Teatr.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żel. Teatr.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Arym.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Arym.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Band.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Band.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Biała

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Biała


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Char.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Char.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Duma

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Duma


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Dzieje

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Dzieje


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Dzien.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Dzien.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Echa

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Echa


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Godz.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Godz.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Grzech

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Grzech


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Ludzie

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Ludzie


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Nawr.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Nawr.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. O Adamie

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. O Adamie


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Opow.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Opow.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Piotr

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Piotr


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Popioły

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Popioły


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Proj.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Proj.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Prom.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Prom.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Przedw.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Przedw.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Przep.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Przep.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Puszcza

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Puszcza


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Rzeka

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Rzeka


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Sen

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Sen


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Snob.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Snob.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Sułk.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Sułk.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Syzyf.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Syzyf.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Śnieg

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Śnieg


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Turoń

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Turoń


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Uroda

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Uroda


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Walg.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Walg.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Wiatr

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Wiatr


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Wspom.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Wspom.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Zamieć

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żer. Zamieć


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Listy

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Listy


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Narc.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Narc.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Pam.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Pam.


text:
ոտնացուպ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stilt

title: ոտնացուպ


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Pog.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Pog.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Pow.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Pow.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Róża

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żmich Róża


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żołn. Pol.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żołn. Pol.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żółk. S. Spór

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żółk. S. Spór


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żółk. S. Stare

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żółk. S. Stare


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żólk.W. Droga

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żólk.W. Droga


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Cór.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Cór.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Dni

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Dni


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Kraj.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Kraj.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Piór.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Piór.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Ręka

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Ręka


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Zioła

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żukr. Zioła


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żul. Weter.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żul. Weter.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żuł. Rzeka

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żuł. Rzeka


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żuł. W. Trag.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żuł. W. Trag.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żur. Szt.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żur. Szt.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żwan Wspom

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żwan Wspom


text: Template:RQ:pl:Życie i Myśl

title: Template:RQ:pl:Życie i Myśl


text: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Lit.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Lit.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Nauki

title: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Nauki


text: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Szk. W.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Szk. W.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Śpiew.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Śpiew.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Warsz.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Życie Warsz.


text: Template:RQ:pl:Żyw. Oświęc.

title: Template:RQ:pl:Żyw. Oświęc.


text:
கொழுக்கட்டை

Etymology
, cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) dumpling

title: கொழுக்கட்டை


text:
קאדיאן

Etymology
.

title: קאדיאן


text: gunk-holed

title: gunk-holed


text: koprzywa

title: koprzywa


text: pokrzywię

title: pokrzywię


text: clunges

title: clunges


text: pokrzywie

title: pokrzywie


text: pokrzyw

title: pokrzyw


text: pokrzywią

title: pokrzywią


text: pokrzywia

title: pokrzywia


text:
pokrzywi

Etymology 1
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  nettle

title: pokrzywi


text: pokrzywiony

title: pokrzywiony


text:
ஓலை

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) pinnation; the leaf of the coconut or palm tree
 * 2) palm-leaf manuscript
 * 3) straw
 * 1) straw

title: ஓலை


text: pokrzywy

title: pokrzywy


text: pokrzywą

title: pokrzywą


text:
鳥獸散

Verb

 * 1) to scatter (and flee)

title: 鳥獸散


text:
উপদ্বীপ

Noun

 * 1) peninsula

Noun

 * 1) peninsula

title: উপদ্বীপ


text:
সিদ্ধাৰ্থ

Etymology
.

title: সিদ্ধাৰ্থ


text: Wiktionary:Word of the day/2023/April 28


text: kladowi

title: kladowi


text: kładowi

title: kładowi


text:
tabajara

Etymology 1
.

Noun

 * 1) member of the Tabajara people

Adjective

 * 1)  of the Tabajara people

Etymology 2
From Organizações Tabajara, a comedy sketch of Casseta e Planeta Urgente showing a fictitious conglomerate that sold items of dubious quality.

Adjective

 * 1)  an item of low-quality or replica of a well-known product

title: tabajara


text: kładów

title: kładów


text: kladów

title: kladów


text:
Ashton Vale

Proper noun

 * , south-west of the city centre.

title: Ashton Vale


text:
অন্ধ্ৰ প্ৰদেশ

Proper noun

 * 1) Andhra Pradesh

title: অন্ধ্ৰ প্ৰদেশ


text:
осыӈ

Adjective

 * 1) thick (about tea)
 * 2) fat, full (about a person)
 * 3) deep (about snow)

title: осыӈ


text:
বিহাৰ

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Bihar

title: বিহাৰ


text:
ва̄ти

Adjective

 * 1) short

title: ва̄ти


text: Category:bg:Genitalia

title: Category:bg:Genitalia


text: Category:az:Felids

title: Category:az:Felids


text: Category:uk:Genitalia

title: Category:uk:Genitalia


text: Category:be:Genitalia

title: Category:be:Genitalia


text: Category:rue:Genitalia

title: Category:rue:Genitalia


text: Category:rue:Sex

title: Category:rue:Sex


text: Template:list:provinces of Turkey/uk

title: Template:list:provinces of Turkey/uk


text:
ഗൃഹാതുരത്വം

Noun

 * 1) nostalgia
 * 2) homeliness

title: ഗൃഹാതുരത്വം


text: Category:mk:Zero

title: Category:mk:Zero


text: Category:az:Mustelids

title: Category:az:Mustelids


text:
mjetë

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  left-over yarn

title: mjetë


text:
surbiri

Etymology
, from.

Verb

 * 1) drink, absorb

title: surbiri


text:
э̄лмхо̄лас

Etymology
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) human, human being

title: э̄лмхо̄лас


text:
Iliacus

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Trojan, related to the city of Troy.

title: Iliacus


text:
ఇంద్రధనుస్సు

Etymology

 * alternatively, 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) rainbow

title: ఇంద్రధనుస్సు


text:
User talk:Victar

Entries needing correction
Will you be continuing to correct the Median, Old Persian, Saka and Scythian entries that I had created now that you are back? Antiquistik (talk) 23:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

 * Regarding the etymology of, do you think there is any viable Old Iranic period reconstruction? Something like or ? Antiquistik (talk) 01:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Would you like me to email you the studies on the Scyhian language I mentioned in the beer parlour that I could not link there? Because, given that we both tend to edit entries in Old Iranian languages on Wiktionary, I feel like the best way to avoid more going in circles would be to share with you the linguistic research due to which I had been disagreeing with you on how to deal with the Scythian languages. This way we can resolve our misunderstandings before having to run in circles again. Antiquistik (talk) 09:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Ossetian
Hi. Can I ask you to give approximate reconstructions for Old Ossetic and Proto-Scythian forms of, please? Gnosandes ❀ (talk) 19:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

❤ Gnosandes ❀ (talk) 20:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Don't remove RFV templates
It doesn't matter if you think it's been attested: we still need to go through the process of having a discussion. If you look at what I wrote on both entries, the issue is whether the terms are attested in Proto-Brythonic or Latin. Theknightwho (talk) 19:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The entry already passed a previous RFV with the same argument, but sure . -- 19:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No it didn't - you merely removed the RFV template on the same incorrect grounds. Theknightwho (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Artognou passed both an RFV and RFC, neither of which were resolved by me. See Talk:Artognou. -- 20:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Neither of those discussions show any kind of consensus; they just petered out. Feel free to address the reason behind the nomination, by the way. Theknightwho (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

*Hwi-(H)was-want
@Victar Recently you requested my entry Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-Iranian/Hwi-(H)was-want for deletion. You wrote the explanation that it is a "Zoroastrian borrowing", then quickly deleted it. What do you mean by that? Can you also define a source for your statement? *Diwodh₃rós (talk) 11:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I deleted and instead cleaned it up. My comment regarding religious terminology borrowings was chiefly referring to . The nominalisation of PII  just means "the shining one", which can be extended to a deity, the sun, dawn, etc. --  00:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you for explanation. *Diwodh₃rós 05:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Ossetian
Hi. Can I ask you once again to make a reconstruction for the, please? ɶLerman (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * LMFAO. Someome gets lifted every day. Sure. -- 05:58, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Reconstruction:Old Ossetic/gænæ. -- 08:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much <3 ɶLerman (talk) 11:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Where and why and whom does someone lifted? :o ɶLerman (talk) 11:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your question re: IPs
The geolocation is wrong and neither are proxies. Besides which, most of the second IP's edits don't even mention Persian even when they could have shoehorned in Irman-style bad Persian etymologies. Right or wrong, I don't think they're Irman. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking. -- 20:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

unþasaggjungu
is not a class II weak verb, so the suffix on should be. Looking at the Descendants, it's OHG that shifted the original -ingu to -ungu (> ). Leasnam (talk) 18:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * no objection from me. -- 03:06, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Page has been moved to . Leasnam (talk) 03:10, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

*froggo
Why is it *prewgʰ- but not *prowgʰ-ō ~ *prugʰ-nos? Leasnam (talk) 04:15, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Because I was reconstructing that step in pre-PG per Kroonen, not a PIE. -- 04:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

*īsajikilljā
Your revert here [] is wrong. The OE & GML are masculine; the Middle Dutch is masculine or neuter. None are feminine. Leasnam (talk) 05:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm going to bed. I'll get up with you again tomorrow :) Leasnam (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Cool, but you deleted the content without moving it, as expressed in my edit comment, "create the entry first, then move". -- Sokkjō 05:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. It's been created, so I'll remove it again. Leasnam (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

d
Please fix incoming links before nominating entries for speedy deletion. Creating more work for the deleter keeps the category from being emptied. I appreciate that you left rationales at e.g. Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-Iranian/Hay- and Reconstruction:Proto-Nuristani/eká, but they're not really actionable; it's not like replacing links to a simple typo. Ultimateria (talk) 03:10, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * My mistake for not checking those. Done. Thanks. -- 03:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I was also referring to Category:Terms derived from the Proto-Indo-Iranian root *Hay- and its subpages. Also, I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at the links to the remaining reconstruction entries in CAT:D. Ultimateria (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I see the confusion. It's because we use roots for the categories without creating the entries in PII and PIIr. -- 06:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Pashto
What is your basis for reverting my Pashto edits? They were all wrongly reverted. Both شیر and روشن are obvious Persian loanwords in Pashto (identical to their Persian form), with روڼ being the inherited form in Pashto. So I removed them as they were listed as inherited forms. It is fine to list those words, but they should be specified as being Persian loanwords in Pashto rather than as inherited forms. And the transliteration of ښ in Pashto is <ṣ>, but <ṣ̌> and  are also seen as acceptable. It represents the /ʂ/ sound. Gharandune (talk) 16:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * , if they're borrowings from Persian, you need to mark them as such, not simply delete them. We mark borrowings using desc template with the 1 parameter. As for transliterations, please use our guide at WT:PS TR. -- 17:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Missing entries from IAIL
Do you know of any version of the Indo-Aryan Inherited Lexicon where the entry for "ks·ay [1]" is not missing? The only one I have at my disposition does not have this entry, and instead has "ks·ay [2]" immediately following "ks·av." Antiquistik (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I do not. That book is a work-in-progress and has many holes and oversights. -- 18:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I have emailed the author of the Indo-Aryan Inherited Lexicon. He replied that he has incorporated it into his upcoming database which will become available next year, the Indo-Iranian Etymological Dictionary. Antiquistik (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Template:R:non:Köbler
If you insist on removing the umlaut, the correct form is Koebler, not Kobler. There are several of Köbler's dictionaries implemented as templates here, all of which use Köbler. Helrasincke (talk) 09:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

 * It would also be a courtesy to update the documentation to reflect the changes. Helrasincke (talk) 09:45, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Stripping combing characters is the standard method for sanitizing template names. Unless you're familiar with each language's orthography, you're not going to know that German /ö/ = /oe/ or Lithuanian /ę/ = /en/. -- Sokkjō 20:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, I take your point that it may not be self-evident, but really the same argument could be made for templates based on transliterations from other scripts (especially those scripts where the translit systems themselves are somewhat arbitrary or have competing norms, say for cyrillic). I'm all for accessibility, but I don't find the logic here compelling, especially since we have on-screen input buttons for non-English characters. I would have preferred it were at least left as a redirect like all the others, since if you don't know what an umlaut is or how to input or even respell one you probably also have little business or interest in providing citations for Germanic sources. And can I ask how exactly deleting the documentation page instead of moving it to the new location helps this presumed aim to improve accessibility? Helrasincke (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Nobody's going to go to CAT:Old Norse reference templates and wonder, "where is Template:R:non:Koebler, I only see Template:R:non:Kobler?" There's no point to a redirect.
 * I did not delete Template:R:non:Kobler/documentation, that was User:Equinox. Equinox, thanks for deleting the redirects for me, but could you restore the aforementioned page? -- Sokkjō 20:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, my bad. I couldn't see whether someone requested the delete and just assumed it was connected. Helrasincke (talk) 21:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

*Hárwāns vs *Harwánts?
Given the morphologies of 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and Old Persian-derived 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬, could 🇨🇬 and similar descendant forms for Proto-Indo-Aryan and Proto-Iranian be preferable reconstructions than 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬? Antiquistik (talk) 13:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No. See Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-Iranian/támHaswāns. -- 16:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * How would you reconstruct the Old Persian form of 🇨🇬 in this case? Antiquistik (talk) 08:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Done. Again, if there are multiple theories, they should all be listed. -- 22:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/korōnā for Old Saxon
Hello. I noticed for this reconstruction: Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/korōnā, the Old Saxon form is listed as "kappa", I assume this is a typo? Thanks so much. ElkandAcquerne (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- 03:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Is there any reason why some Old Persian terms end with -ʰ while the other reconstruction entries you have edited recently now end with -h instead of -ʰ? Additionally, the 🇨🇬 term is attested, per Tavernier, so is there any reason why you have removed it? Antiquistik (talk) 13:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Ngl, it's a bit frustrating you don't read edit comments, especially when you're pinged in them. See . As for the Median, don't create reconstructions without descendants. -- 16:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I had read the ping, but I had initially misunderstood it. For the Median, does this mean there should be Middle Median and later descendants for there to be reconstructions? Antiquistik (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Essentially, <ʰ> and <ⁿ> are only used in transcription of attested OP terms to denote that they are in the word, but are not being expressed in the cuneiform. There should never be any reconstructions, either as an entry or in a descendants list, without noting attested descendants, derivatives, or borrowings. -- 23:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

póyh₂-w-eh₂
Hi Victar, how do you mean this is a post-PIE resolving r/n-stem? That isn't at all straighforward to me. For one thing it's not post-PIE. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If you have a look at other r/n-stems, in late-PIE and its descendants they were nearly all rebuilt to new stems, so is practically expected. Not the case with u-stems, even neuter u-stems, which if rebuilt, just become masculine u-stems. --  11:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you be more specific? What happened to the r/n? Is there a model for this kind of process? Maybe you're right, but at the moment it seems quite random. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 18:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Because r/n-stems fell out of productivity and usually when that happens, they get rebuilt. Not random at all. -- 04:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If you look at it either gets reanalised as *watōr based on the strong stem or *watna- based on the weak stem. Or if they really couldn't deal with r/n-stems they could plausibly give it up entirely and rederive a different word from a different base. But I've never heard of what you're suggesting. So can you please explain what you mean and give some other examples? —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Even in your example, it was indeed rebuilt from the collective as an r-stem within PIE and became a consonant stem in Germanic. See RC:Proto-Indo-European/sóh₂wl̥ an example of PIE descendants dealing with r/n-stems. -- 13:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you not understand what I mean? When words are rebuilt the new stem is based on an existing form. All descendants of have either an l or an n, or whatever these sounds change into through regular sound change. Sometimes words change under the influence of other vocabulary items, but in that case you need to name those and explain how the analogy worked. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 13:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Maybe it's a terminology issue that is confusing. Let me try this way. If a stem class no longer exists, it needs to be rebuilt into a different class. Proto-Germanic, for example, does not possess an r/n-stem class, so the language demands that it be rebuilt as a class it does. This process of rebuilding r/n-stems as a different stem class was already occurring during late nuclear PIE. Not so for u-stems, which still survives as a productive class to this day. -- 14:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I get that stem classes evolve. The question is: how? What is the process? You say we start with . How do we get to *póyh₂weh₂? Historical linguists spend a lot of time and effort arguing how one form could get reanalysed as something else. For some reason you seem to be skipping this. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 15:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * How depends on the word and the class, but with r/n-stems, they often become n-stems, due to their similarity in declension. How or why doesn't really matter in this case. The only question is "which form is more likely to be rebuilt, an r/n-stem, or a u-stem", and the answer is r/n-stem, full stop. -- 23:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * It really does matter. Please give me some examples where something similar happened, because this flies in the face of what I know about language. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 23:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * What does? Have you not looked through the r~l/n-stem entries on the project? Plenty of examples of how they were rebuilt. -- 00:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * It matters how and why. Yes I have looked through the r/n l/n stems on the project. Please name some examples of Greek words which were rebuilt in a similar way. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 00:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * You mean like ~  >  > ? Honestly, at this point, it feels like you're arguing for the sake of arguing. --  01:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm really trying to understand where you're coming from, but you're giving me nothing. A similar change to *péyh₂-wr̥ ~ *pih₂-wén-s > *póyh₂w-eh₂. Please. A few examples that lead you to say "practically expected". —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 01:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure: ~  >  > ? --  01:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The whole point of my moving *póyh₂w-eh₂ was that it doesn't contain r or n. You insisted it belonged to *péyh₂-wr̥ ~ *pih₂-wén-s despite that. I keep asking you to explain and provide examples. You finally give me an example which retains the r/n. Making it not similar. At all. And you accuse me of arguing for the sake of it? Please just answer the question or admit you don't know. I'd like to be able to work with you because you make tons of great edits, but sometimes you're so strangely obstinate. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 02:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * LMAO. This has been fun. Merry Christmas! -- 02:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Before you start wheel-warring, please read the sources I added. Regardless of anything I wrote above, sources derive from PIE . The stress on the term clearly points to a secondary formation, either from a PIE mobile noun, or a intra-PII derivation, i.e. this cant not be derived directly from the root. --  22:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

About Nuristani
It's unfortunate we don't have anything detailing comparative Nuristani, besides Morgenstierne's inaccessible NTS notes (at least online) and DN Nelson's "The Historical Development of the Nuristani Languages", which is also inaccessible since ProQuest only offers a preview and appears to be preliminary. Jakob Halfmann has been researching for a few years now, and has published an article tentatively linking a Nuristani word to Bactrian, alongside some sound rules. I wonder if you could refer to him as a reliable source for future Nuristani research, alongside the possibility of contacting him and also Irén Hegedűs. Thank you. Kwékwlos (talk) 02:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * , the problem with Proto-Nuristani reconstructions is two-fold: 1) As you mentioned, we don't have great sources, chiefly because there hasn't much research on the family. Nelson's paper is really old -- typed on a typewriter -- but is covered in modern papers. 2) If we're going to reconstruct Proto-Nuristani, it should be done from the point that all the extant Nuristani languages diverged, not simply slightly modified PII.
 * What needs to be done is someone needs to create a table, like I did for User:Victar/Reflexes/Proto-Indo-Iranian, illustrating all the steps from Proto-Nuristani to modern Nuristani languages. Only with that can we formulate a common ancestral form. Until then, these reconstructions should be deleted as they're apocryphal. -- 07:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I assume the current "limbo" state is due to the fact that not many researchers are willing to brave Afghanistan's political climate to collect data from the Nuristani languages and therefore set up a preliminary reconstruction of Proto-Nuristani (aside from Nelson's), and also due to late attestation (within the past few centuries only). Fortunately, Jakob Halfmann has already submitted a grammar on Katë (Kamkata-vari), which hasn't been published yet. There's also a Dari-language grammar on the Zhonchigal dialect of Nuristani Kalasha (Waigali) by Samiullah Taza, if we exclude Degener's German article on the Nisheygram dialect and Gryunberg's Russian article on the Kata-vari dialect.
 * PS: Jakob Halfmann has his own Twitter (@bitmalang), so you may want to reach out to him there, including possibly obtaining access to Morgenstierne's numerous notes on Nuristani languages. Kwékwlos (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * There should be an upcoming project called "An Etymological Dictionary of the Nuristani Nominal Lexicon". When it is published, we can then cite it for our Proto-Nuristani reconstructions should they appear. Kwékwlos (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

*rammēn
Hi Sokkjo ! You have postulated the ancestor of 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬, as 🇨🇬, and I can reason why; however, wouldn't *rammēn be intrasitive and mean "to become strong" rather than "to make strong" ? Should it maybe be *rammōn instead and the alternation between a and e just be due to dialectal variance or alteration of æ ? Leasnam (talk) 06:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Whatever you think is best, I support. It's a bit of a trainwreck entry that I did my best to cleanup and port from RC:Proto-Germanic/rammaz. -- Sokkjō 06:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand. Okay, thank you. I will go to bed now and take a fresh look at it tomorrow :) Leasnam (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I just realised the OFS ramia, remia means "to build, construct" and isn't related to . The OFS term is derived from . This also puts OE remian from on shaky ground, since there is no clear-cut way to derive it from *rammēn, losing an m and also changing the transitivity.  Leasnam (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, good night for now :) Leasnam (talk) 06:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Meanwhile, is showing up in a maintenance category I monitor because desctree can't find a Descendants section at  under the relevant ID due to it's being disguised as a Derived terms section. Unless you can figure out some way to fix that, all the descendants you removed when you cleaned up the entry are just gone. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I as you were writing this, but thanks. -- Sokkjō 08:40, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Low German
You removed my changes of "Bread" in Low German. Why, these two forms are correct. Westfäölsk Meyewiärker (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It's not about the forms, but the edit: you told the template to link to " ", instead of " ", " " and " ". To properly fix the edit would require verifying that all three actually exist, and we only have an entry for the one that was already there. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

hrama, rama f
My issue is not the gender, but how it's being shown by the desctree template. Because it is showing alternative forms, it's placing the "f" between hrama and rama. It should come after rama. This is glitch that should be addressed. Leasnam (talk) 22:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Proto-Dravidian labels at MOD:labels/data/lang/dra-pro

 * User:AleksiB_1945 User:Illustrious Lock

where was this agreed upon?
 * It was based on your suggestion at User_talk:AleksiB_1945#Proto-Dravidian_entries
 * If the differences are minor, perhaps labels would be better, like used in Germanic, ex. Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/lagu.

Thanks for the improvements. Kutchkutch (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm all for using labels, just not a supporter, per the literature, of a genetic South Dravidian above supposed SDI and SDII. Correct, in keeping of other languages which use dialectal labels in this way, I dropped the proto prefix. Thanks for moving forward with this. -- 06:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Might get rid of proto langs like iir-pro, gem-pro and reconstruct all branch specific words like *matsyas and *kutas to PIE and label them similarly too? *cinki a words attested in just 4 languages of the same inner branch gets reconstructed to PD even if it isnt attested to that time? also stop comparing branches like SD to recent inner branches like west Germanic, literary languages like Tamil itself is attested to ~3 cen bce, the same time as proto Germanic; PSD is comparable to proto Balto-Slavic.
 * Also you cant add the etymology in language pages if the branches only get labels AleksiB 1945 (talk) 06:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * When you first reverted the changes, I thought that you would oppose this. However, it is good to see that you are willing to use labels.
 * You are understandably still upset about not having separate language codes for Proto-South Dravidian, PSD I, PSD II, etc. However, this at least is some progress without having a larger discussion or vote. Now there are categories that can be created such as:

 * Category:South Dravidian
 * Category:South-Central Dravidian
 * Category:North Dravidian

 * Kutchkutch (talk) 11:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It was agreed by everyone to make SD Tamil-Tulu, SCD Telugu-Kui and name Tamil-Telugu something like macro-south.
 * How do you enter the etymology in a page like without those codes? and why is just Dravidian branches not having the codes while west Germanic which existed like 1200 years ago (around the same time Malayalam split) have the lang code? AleksiB 1945 (talk) 13:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I recommend that you start an official new request in the Beer parlour with the name of the language and sources that support it. For an example, see Beer_parlour/2019/September. -- 14:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Already done that like 3 times like this one few weeks ago and ends up having no response AleksiB 1945 (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The discussion you started and linked above is unparsed and structureless. Please see the example I gave. -- 17:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Segmentation hyphens in derived terms sections
Why did you delete affix segmentation hyphens on that page twice when they are standard in PIE entries (and hence I followed that model)? — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * PIE entries have a different, more academic, formatting than other languages. The standard for formatting entries is to not use hyphens in descendants lists, cf. Latin, Proto-Germanic, etc. While you're here, never use m or raw text for entry list items, and only use pos for parts of speech. -- Sokkjō 16:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * IMO Proto-Celtic should allow PIE-style hyphens. It is standard to cite prefixed derivatives with hyphens like that in Celtic studies and increases reconstruction transparency and readability. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Disagree, but feel free to post about it in the beer parlour or somewhere. -- Sokkjō 17:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Victar Mass-removing these after a discussion has been posted about this is unacceptable, and it's far from the first time you've done this kind of thing. I've given you a block for 3 days, as this is is yet another example of you failing to collaborate in a reasonable manner. Theknightwho (talk) 22:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Block by Theknightwho

 * The issue is not about what you think are the standard formatting conventions. The issue is edits like this (and others) while you know there is an ongoing discussion, as part of a much larger pattern of the same behaviour which you have engaged in for years. It is extremely tiresome, and given that you have consistently ignored (or responded rudely to) requests by others to not do this kind of thing, there is little else that can be done but give you a time-out. Or need I bring up the whole plus-template debacle? Theknightwho (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The issue is absolutely formatting standard. I told them above that if they want to change the status quo on how we format derived terms list, they're more than welcome to, but the onerous is on them to do so. Until then, standard formatting applies.
 * And now we're at the root of it. This is, in truth, a block of personal vendetta made in poor faith over discussions like Beer_parlour/2023/November, where I've called you out for your wildly unchecked behavior. How you haven't been removed as an admin is just beyond me. -- 00:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't see how your past form for doing this with the plus-templates could be relevant to any kind of personal vendetta by me, since I wasn't editing then; nor your endless etymology-section edit wars with Djkcel, your consistent rude behaviour towards Vininn126, or any of the many other personal feuds you seem to keep getting into. What I do know, though, is that it all points towards a much larger pattern. Trying to make this about me is simply yet another excuse to avoid the issue that your behaviour is the problem here. Enough. Theknightwho (talk) 00:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I've unblocked Victar (but not Sokkjo, since I'm unclear on the reason for the second account). The changes in hyphenation on Proto-Celtic pages are unproblematic, though they were also unproblematic before: we don't use hyphens in Reconstruction entry names, but cel-pro doesn't create a link, so it's OK. cel-pro is also OK; cel-pro would be an acceptable compromise. I had no idea TKW was an admin; that's pretty appalling given his relentless "my way or the highway" style of interacting with other editors. —Mahāgaja · talk 07:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree, and have unblocked the account Sokkjo following your unblock of Victar: the two accounts were blocked over the same issue. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 10:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. For the record, since it seems to bother some people, I use my User:Victar account for PIE and Indo-Iranian edits, and my User:Sokkjo account for Germanic and Celtic, to better keep track of my edits and watchlists. -- 16:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * TKW had viewed a mass hyphen deletion as retaliatory for me asking about it on his talk page and in Beer Parlor, hence the block. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 13:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Of the 14 of yours edits I cleaned up yesterday, only 3 has any affect on hyphenation. Hardly a "mass hyphen deletion" and why would I take "retaliatory" action for something I recommend you do. For the record, I didn't even see your Beer Parlour post because, for some reason, you didn't tag me. -- 16:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mahagaja I have absolutely no opinion on the issue of hyphenation here. My concern is over Victar bullying another user (yet again). Theknightwho (talk) 18:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * What do "plus-templates" have anything to do with this? Really what happened was User:Mellohi! complained on the en.Wikt discord, editors User:Djkcel and User:Vininn126 made inflammatory comments like "Victar is an ass", and you, in complete bad faith, blocked me. Your ignorance to the matter is made plain by the fact that you reverted all my edits, not just the 3 mentioned above. -- 18:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Victar I’ve explained right there how it’s relevant. Theknightwho (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * To reply to your grasping at straws rational, asking User:Mellohi! to start a discussion on their formatting change proposal is not "bullying". -- 18:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Victar You're not really helping yourself when you immediately go on to make comments like this. Theknightwho (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, we don't all the the ability to like you do. --  11:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Victar Yes, always dodging the point must be exhausting for you. Theknightwho (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * TKW, you do a lot of skillful and useful technical work, and I didn't support either of the previous votes to desysop you because they were trying to desysop you for doing ultimately correct stuff (e.g. blocking Dan Polansky) ... and you tend to only do temperature-raising / less-than-ideal things when other people are doing such things and are unsympathetic/problematic themselves, so it's hard to defend any one of them ... but at a certain point, it becomes noticeable that in the multiple situations which keep coming up where "another editor and you are behaving in less-than-ideal ways, and then (e.g.) you issue a block or page-protection/lock which it would've been better if someone else, or no-one, had issued", the common factor is you. I have to admit I've started to wonder if things would go more smoothly if you were a Template Editor and Interface Editor rather than an Admin...? - -sche (discuss) 18:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @-sche In this situation, I wasn’t involved at all before issuing the block. Theknightwho (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Source of Ravensbergisch-Lippisch Vocabulary
Hello,

In scrolling through Old Saxon vocabulary, I often see edits made by you regarding Ravensbergisch-Lippisch vocabulary terms. I have a PDF of a Ravensbergisch-Hochdeutsch Dictionary, however some terms in there are different than those in these edits. I was wondering if I may know what source you are using; I am very interested in this dialect, and this makes me think that there may be other dictionaries that I have not found.

Thank you,

FWRabbermann (talk) 14:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello . There are quite a few, see https://www.plattdeutsch-niederdeutsch.net/bibliographie/lippbibl.htm. Good luck in your research. -- Sokkjō 18:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

*h2éwsōs / -ōs
While it's true on the face of it that the paradigms given in and  don't match, there are additional complexities to consider: First, I was greatly surprised that the suffix is defined as acrostatic, as long suffixal ō is usually the hallmark of amphikinetic inflection; the descendants don't help out definitively because accented root vowel features in both paradigms, Greek generalizes (é)-(o)-E anyways as evidenced by *awhóh-os, and the Latin nouns are really hard to disentangle from their respective -eō verbs. So unless you have a good source saying otherwise I would suggest editing the paradigm in to (é)-ōs/(0)-(0)-és (from which the Greek and Latin paradigms could be traditionally leveled; alternatively this plus "later acrostatic inflection"), and linking to -ōs in the etymology of h2éwsōs.

Additionally I need to point out how badly the paradigmatic approach works for Wiktionary. The paradigms are idealized abstractions and usually dont fit the reflex data without much analogy, leading to so many unconventional paradigms implemented on various pages (which often don't really fit the data very well either). Case in point the other s-stems which traditionally would be reconstructed as proterokinetic (é)-(0)s-E/(0)-(é)s-E later remodeled to (tentatively acrostatic) (é)-(o)s-E/(é)-(e)s-E, hysterokinetic (0)-(é)s-s/(0)-(0)-(é) though I don't know if its ever attested like that, and amphikinetic (é)-(o)-s/(0)-(0)-és. Don't you think it would be true to principle to give all of them like that even though they almost never show up like that? And then maybe add a small dossier of common analogical changes in the reflexes. Or make it easier and let the hodge-podge back-projections of the reflexes remain but dont call them by their traditional paradigm names. Anatol Rath (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi . I'm fine with you changing the paradigm on to amphikinetic, just please mention in a reconstruction note that Sihler reconstructs it with a non-ablauting stem. Thanks for following up. And yes, idealized reconstructions vs. reality is always going to be a headache. --  23:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Question about Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/aland
The entry states: Possibly from Proto-Indo-European *alandī (“nourishing, healing”), present participle of *alan (“to nourish”). Instead of Proto-Indo-European, should that read Proto-Germanic *alandī or Proto-West Germanic *alandī? Thanks so much! ElkandAcquerne (talk) 19:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/leubō
Why did you delete this page? Mannrinn (talk) 23:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * RC:Proto-Germanic/leubō was not deleted but instead moved to RC:Proto-West Germanic/leubu, as it is limited to West Germanic. -- Sokkjō 08:06, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * There are many other words that are limited to West Germanic as there are in North Germanic and East Germanic, but that is not a good reason to move their respective Proto-Germanic pages. Mannrinn (talk) 02:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ummm, have you seen the etymology on RC:Proto-West Germanic/leubu? -- Sokkjō 02:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes I have and my point still stands. I am sorry for the late reply. Mannrinn (talk) 15:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Module:User:Victar/term cognates
I was poking around your user pages and I saw this interesting project your briefly worked on in 2017. Are you still interested in implementing it? I think it should be relatively simple to integrate this functionality into etymon. The way it would work is that, , etc. would be added into Category:Direct descendants of Proto-Indo-European *ph₂tḗr. Then the template would access this category and generate the text "Cognate with X, Y, and Z." or maybe create a list. And of course a cognate in the same language is actually a doublet. Ioaxxere (talk) 05:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Sources for the Curonian šinga and Sudovian asing
Hello and good afternoon,

In the page for the Proto-Indo-European *h₁ésh₂r̥ you had edited in a Sudovian, asing, and Curonian, šinga and a Proto-Balto-Slavic reconstructed ancestor for said terms. What I wanted to ask is what your source for the Curonian and Sudovian terms is, because I cannot seem to find them anywhere. I am curious in regards to this as up to this point I was under the impression that there were no concretely attested Curonian words, just some terms reconstructed mostly from Lithuanian or Latvian toponyms. In regards to the Sudovian term, I simply couldn't find it anywhere. There is a single dictionary for Yotvingian/Sudovian with an online glossary and it does not mention the term and finding other sources for the language online is difficult to say the least. TheFearlessHussar (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 * One exception would be if the Curonian šinga was in Pater Noster which might be in Curonian, but I don't think it would be found there. TheFearlessHussar (talk) 17:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * See Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia (2002). Looks like they were reversed though. -- 22:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok so before I go ahead and read the source that said source mentions for those terms(W. Euler, “Schweiß” und “Blut” in den baltischen Sprachen: Überlegungen zur Stellung des Altpreussischen und Nehrungskurischen, pp. 33-34 and Z. Zinkevičius, “A Polish-Yatvingian Vocabulary?”, Linguistic and Oriental Studies from Poznań, vol. 1, Poznań 1992, pp. 99-133, esp. 118.), you should change the curonian entry to "latvian, dialectal, kursenieki" and swap the two terms around. The mention in your source is for a Jatvingian(aka Yotvingian aka Sudovian) singa(siga) and a "Nehrungskurische(NCr.)" asing. As the german term used for this language suggests, this is not Curonian, but "Curonian of the Spit" which is better known in english as "Kursenieki". Kursenieki is not Curonian even though it might have had a few Curonian elements in the beginning and at the end of the day Kursenieki is a Latvian dialect. TheFearlessHussar (talk) 08:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * sources not source*
 * Also I cannot be certain I will be able to find them in digital format. TheFearlessHussar (talk) 09:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * For the Sudovian singa, it is as both the original and the source you stated, unclear. The source which you state only lists "ſi.ga" to portray that fact and reconstructs the terms as siga. The original source(Z. Zinkevičius, “A Polish-Yatvingian Vocabulary?”) mentions in lithuanian that: "Some words are completely unclear or difficult to interpret:" and then lists a few words with this unclear "ſi...ga" being among them and listed as being equivalent to "kraujas(blood)". So you could say that it checks out? Kinda? Moreover note that whilst that source is useful, its accuracy is dubious at best and that in turn is mentioned. It is based a purportedly Yotvingian dictionary found in the forests of Belarus in the 1970s and might be a mix of Lithuanian and Yotvingian and hence why there is a "?" in its title. A summary of this info exists at this link: https://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/90. A download link exists at this link for an analysis of that dictionary: https://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/90/55. To download click ATSISIŲSTI PDF FAILĄ below the info box. Note that the pdf is in lithuanian. TheFearlessHussar (talk) 09:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have not yet been able to find "W. Euler, “Schweiß” und “Blut” in den baltischen Sprachen: Überlegungen zur Stellung des Altpreussischen und Nehrungskurischen". I will try again, but I doubt it will lead to anything. TheFearlessHussar (talk) 09:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * OK, good catch on Nehrungskurische. I've changed the entry link to Latvian on . -- 16:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah very nice. Thanks a lot! TheFearlessHussar (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

errors
See CAT:E. 224 errors, mostly in PWG terms. Benwing2 (talk) 22:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Whoops! Thanks, fixed. -- Sokkjō 02:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Proto-Balto-Slavic *tewas
Hello and good morning,

This is a rather simple request of mine in regards to the contents of the page mentioned. I recently made some edits on the contents of that page and specifically removed the entry for Skalvian, as tiewe is dialectal Old Prussian not Skalvian though I do note further in regards to that there, and I also fixed the spelling for the Curonian entry. I somehow managed to add a link to the source that has the information I am referring to, but I think that overal the edits have not been made in the most, well, elegant way, owing to the fact that I don't know how to edit wiktionary pages. Would it be possible for you to check the contents of that page and polish them if need be? I did not know who else to ask about this.

Thanks in advance TheFearlessHussar (talk) 05:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please post this to WT:TEA. Also, the "notes" you posted to RC:Proto-Balto-Slavic/tewas should be made to a discussion page. -- 01:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for the information. Someone already did edit the notes out and I added them to the discussion page for that term. TheFearlessHussar (talk) 08:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Alright, sorry
Hey, what's up? It's been more than a year by now I think and I assume you have forgotten about it, but anyways, everything aside, I wanted to apologise for calling PIE entries your playground on a server you weren't present in. It was unfair and in any case not a productive thing to do. I was a bit stressed, hope you'll understand. Catonif (talk) 16:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Catonif, that's big of you. Glad things are less stressful now for you. -- 06:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Formatting of
@Sokkjo I follow the established formatting of entries as much as possible, even when I disagree with it. I appreciate when you point out any mistakes I made. However when there is no established convention, editors have a certain amount of leeway to format an entry as they see fit. I don't think it is right that you should impose your personal preferences in the reconstruction namespace on everyone else.

One option would be to state why your formating is better than mine. In the past I have often found myself agreeing with you. Alternatively, or if we aren't able to agree, we could have a discussion about it so everyone can give their input, so that we can add appropriate sections to WT:AINE or WT:RECONS.

Regarding specific changes:

 * At WT:AINE it currently says: "Derivations are listed in alphabetical order by the suffix." I think we should follow that. That means éye- before ye-.

 * I don't know Ossetian, but I know there is an Ossetian term. Rather than add an incorrect one I left a placeholder so someone more knowledgeable can add it.

 * I don't understand why you keep removing important references.

 * It is not desirable to have redlinks for reconstructed terms with only one descendant. On the other hand terms with multiple descendants and which are securely reconstructed are fine to have a redlink. The reason for that is that a redlink is an invitation to create an entry and we don't want people creating the wrong ones.

—Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 08:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

 * , let's get this clear: these are not my formatting standards -- they were set long before I came to the project by the likes of User:JohnC5 and User:Rua. My only interest in this is consistency, and your push for your own formatting preferences breaks that. With that out of the way, here are the issues with to RC:Proto-Indo-European/dʰeh₁(y)-:

looks very much like a secondary full-grade from an original *dʰh₁i- zero-grade, or perhaps from metathesized thematic present (per Mayrhofer). could derive from via laryngeal metathesis, but PS causative suffix  was highly productive, and very likely points to a secondary form (per Rix and Derksen). Would also RFD RC:Proto-Indo-European/dʰh₁éyeti in a heartbeat.
 * 1) You are correct to point out that WT:AINE at odds with common practice of sorting by grade and suffix, as opposed to simply suffix, as User:Rua  into the guidelines there. I don't really care either way, beyond wanting consistency, but, as is, the vast majority of entries short by grade. Either WT:AINE should be changed, or all entries should be changed.
 * 2) At no time do we create blank descendant tree end nodes simply because we think an entry should exist there. If I saw an IP doing that, I would report them as a vandal.
 * 3) Adding references to the entry that do not add any new information is just clutter, detracting from the helpful sources. In this case, the references was supporting the Proto-Celtic reconstruction, which has its own entry containing that same reference.
 * 4) If you look at the formatting on other PIE entries, there are no redlinks in the descendants lists. Even if a term has multiple descendants, that doesn't mean those descendants aren't secondary, and great scrutiny should be used before creating an entry. As you pointed out, we don't want to invite users to create entries without proper critical thinking.
 * 5) For some reason I don't understand, you keep removing the redlinks for Proto-Indo-Iranian entries, and without any rational in your edit comments, continue to revert me. Why?
 * 6) Here are some other edits I don't understand, but I assume are due to your bulk revert:
 * 7) * Moving Proto-Hellenic above Proto-Armenian, instead of below Proto-Germanic.
 * 8) * Changing hyx-pro to hyx-pro, which is done because we don't reconstruct Proto-Armenian.
 * 9) * Changing *dʰeh₁(i)-lw-ih₂-k-s to *dʰeh₁(y)-l̥w-ih₂-k-s, even though the sequence *-h₁yl- would become *-h₁il-.
 * 10) * Changing *dʰeh₁(i)-n-os to *dʰeh₁(i)-n-os ~ *dʰeh₁(i)-n-es-os, even though we only list two forms if there is a change on the root.
 * -- 17:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarifying. It is impossible for me to verify whether these conventions came from @JohnC5 and @Rua. Maybe they want to comment here? It would be very helpful. Absent that, I can only tell you what it looks like from my point of view: you pulling 'conventions upheld since time immemorial' out of thin air. In some cases that is even hard to deny, when they fly in the face of the few explicit guidelines we have.
 * Case in point.
 * You haven't given a reason why not, only an Appeal to tradition. I added the branch consciously, as I've told you now twice, and I added a reference for that (LIV) at the root of the branch.
 * The aforementioned is precisely the reason why I add references "that do not add any new information". As I've said before, I think it should be visible at first glance what scholarship a reconstruction is based on, without having to click away.
 * I've said why these redlinks are justified: they are securely reconstructed. I took great care checking that. And I backed it up with references. They are not secondary.
 * I did say why I removed those redlinks: they have only one descendant. This was a topic of discussion that you also took part in: Requests_for_deletion/Reconstruction. A large majority find reconstructed entries (not just Italic) with only one descendant undesirable. The reason for that is that they don't contain new information.
 * Those are fair points. Side note: I'd like to have all those derived terms with only Italic descendants gone. Most of them certainly aren't reconstructable. I only left them because I don't know what to do with the information and I don't want to carelessly delete it. I made the small changes I did because if they existed in PIE, then they must have followed PIE syllabification rules. That means *dʰeh₁(y)-l̥w-ih₂-k-s, not *dʰeh₁(i)-lw-ih₂-k-s. The fact that this appears impossible proves my point.
 * I also care about consistency, which you may know because it has come up in several of our discussions. That is why I always write entries with a close eye on existing entries. But on some points I diverge, which is allowed, important even: too much rigour is stifling. Just as I don't revert your edits only because they aren't my cup of tea, it is not unreasonable for me to ask you to grant me that same courtesy.
 * If you find some or all of my reasoned preferences unpalatable, that is also fine. But instead of edit-warring, let's get those undocumented conventions you keep referencing documented by having a discussion where everyone who wants to can have their say. I will play a constructive part in it. It would save you time, effort, and frustration too, not having to constantly point them out to editors who can hardly be expected to know of them. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't know how I can hammer this point home anymore than I have: these are not my conventions and I'm not "pulling [them] out of thin air" -- there are plenty of examples of this formatting in use, far pre-dating even me. It is  you  that are breaking from the standards set by  the community , so please don't misrepresent the situation as this being me versus you.
 * 1. Per above, your "case in point" is moot, but if you want to follow WT:AINE to a tee, we can just change the language there to reflect the status quo.
 * 2., , or some other editor, if you want to comment on having strings of blank descs in descendant trees (see ), be my guest.
 * 3. Arguing that references should be repeated on all pages simply because you think people would want that is a logical fallacy.
 * 4. As I've said before, just because a reconstruction can be sourced, doesn't mean it should have trusted, let alone have an entry, but sure, let's go over :
 * can actually be derived directly from new-present . There is absolutely no reason to assume it was rebuilt from a nasal-infix, and if RC:Proto-Indo-European/dʰinéh₁ti was created, I would RFD it.
 * There is no such thing as an "éye-present" in PIE, only an eye-causative/iterative, which would give us.
 * The third redlink is the only one with any traction, but as, which is demanded by the Slavic, and viable for the Germanic. , hoverver, could belong just about anywhere, i.e. , , , , so it can't be used as an example for any particular reconstruction, and is a secondary form which Frisk (and Beekes) claims is rebuilt from aorist . With just , , and  beside lonesome , I would recommend against an RC:Proto-Indo-European/dʰéh₁eti entry, and would RFD an RC:Proto-Indo-European/dʰéh₁yeti entry.
 * To be fully blunt, your hubris outpaces your actual knowledge of Proto-Indo-European and are overly reliant on sources in an attempt to compensate. This is a continuing theme and I really think you should better verse yourself before edit warring PIE entries.
 * 5. Perhaps you're not aware, but I'm also a leading PII editor on the project (lowkey wrote the book). Sometimes I will remove PIA redlinks, due to specific reasons for not wanting PIA entries, but never has it been a convention to remove redlinks from Proto-Indo-Iranian or Proto-Iranian reconstructions, even with a single descendant. You would find yourself in hot water doing so in Germanic as well. You've misinterpreted a vote on Proto-Italic thinking it applies to all languages, when it does not.
 * -- 07:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll offer my view on these two points:
 * 1) I support (and myself practice) the removal of redlinks in cases where leaving them would encourage the creation of entries that really don't need to exist. In this case the convention for PIE on Wiktionary has, as long as I can remember, been to ‘centralize’ derived terms and their descendants under one entry. If that is to be changed, it would call for a discussion.
 * 2) If the source in question only concerns itself with Proto-Celtic and descendants thereof, and has no useful comment to offer on the higher-level reconstruction (PIE), I see no benefit in citing it under *dʰeh₁(y)-. The Proto-Celtic entry exists and already hosts that source, and a reader should expect to find sources for descendants on the entries for those descendants. Note for instance that the entry for simply hosts the source that directly mentions and supports that reconstruction, rather than the fifteen sources focussing on individual descendants thereof, which are found on the descendant entries where they are relevant. I'd rather not have to dig through sixteen sources under  to find the one which actually talks about that reconstruction. Granted this is (for illustrative purposes) a more extreme example than the above, but the principle stands. Nicodene (talk) 08:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It is Victar himself who creates separate pages for large subbranches. I've never protested that but in the absense of explicit guidelines I have edited with that possibility in mind. If no redlinks in desctrees and no repetition of references is what we decide, I'm fine with that. If we don't want guidelines it is only reasonable that editors get a little bit of flexibility to edit as they see fit. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 12:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * There are no standards set by the community. If you find it important that certain formatting should be standardised, let's talk about it.
 * We could do that. Or we could change all the entries that were erroneously ordered.
 * As probably the person with the most expertise in Indo-Iranian on the project, you could have made this a moot point by now. It would have taken you about 10 seconds.
 * The reference supports the Proto-Celtic reconstruction in that form at that position in the descendants tree. Without it the house is built on loose sand. I argued no such thing. I find it important that everything is well-referenced and I've explained why.
 * At the risk of getting distracted from the point at hand:
 * That is possible. However considering that the Celtic reconstruction is secure that wouldn't be the best bet. Note also that there are more Sanskrit verbs that were moved from the -nā- to the -no- class, e.g..
 * Your reasoning here is methodologically unsound. Obscure terms which demand an explanation carry extraordinary weight. You can't hand-wave them away.
 * If you had read LIV2 you'd know that there is (page 19 (1s)), 15 certain, 21 uncertain. I'm not going to respond to the rest, except to ask you to try and keep it professional. Insults are uncalled for.
 * I know the vote was about Italic, but the same reasoning applies, arguments from tradition notwithstanding.
 * Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * In your own words, you "edit as [you] see fit", and as further illustrated above, in disregard for conventions and the expertise of your fellow contributors, stubbornly entrenching yourself on principle, instead of working cooperatively in good faith. I truly don't see any way forward without admin intervention. --  16:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Victar If you're going to pull someone up on not following conventions, it's only fair that those conventions be written down somewhere, whether it be at WT:EL, WT:AINE, WT:References, or somewhere else. What this discussion tells me is that there is a need to update some or all of these pages, because they have fallen out of step with community practices. I think it would be fair to move this discussion to Wiktionary talk:About Proto-Indo-European or the beer parlour to solicit broader community input about any required changes. This, that and the other (talk) 22:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I do think that it's advisable, in general, to look at comparable entries to see how things are done. That said, it would only take a minute or two to update AINE#Derived terms and descendants to reflect the current handling of things, and having a clear description to point to won't hurt. Incidentally it'd help to have 'about' pages be higher-profile/more prominently displayed somewhere. Nicodene (talk) 23:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Completely agreed. Benwing2 (talk) 09:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Victar


text:
Czop

Etymology 2
.

title: Czop


text:
പുഞ്ച

Noun

 * 1) a crop sown in November and December, reaped in April.
 * 2) dry crop

title: പുഞ്ച


text:
蔗園

Noun

 * 1) sugarcane plantation

title: 蔗園


text:
ойме

Etymology
From ~, from. Akin to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) soul, spirit

Derived terms

 * verbs: ,
 * nouns:

title: ойме


text:
till bords

Etymology
From, with frozen genitive from when governed the genitive.

Adverb

 * 1) at the table

title: till bords


text:
lægge vægt på

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to consider important

title: lægge vægt på


text:
Graius

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to Greece, Grecian.

title: Graius


text:
Vidkunn

Etymology
, from, thus meaning.

Usage notes
The name was made infamous by the traitor and Nazi collaborator (1887–1945).

title: Vidkunn


text: Template:RQ:Koht Sverre-soga

title: Template:RQ:Koht Sverre-soga


text:
pokrzywowy

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  nettle

title: pokrzywowy


text:
осься

Adjective

 * 1) narrow, thin

title: осься


text:
Vidkun

Usage notes
The name was made infamous by the traitor and Nazi collaborator (1887–1945).

title: Vidkun


text:
livets hårda skola

Etymology
From, "the tough school of life."

Noun

 * 1)  the school of hard knocks

Usage notes
Sometimes used in a mocking sense to imply that someone's opinions on a subject carry little weight because they have not formally studied it.

title: livets hårda skola


text:
headie

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  The head.

title: headie


text:
inaesthetically

Adverb

 * 1) In an inaesthetic manner.

Translations

 * Polish: aestetycznie, nieestetycznie

title: inaesthetically


text: Ewood Bridge

title: Ewood Bridge


text: Riefler

title: Riefler


text: Youngdahl

title: Youngdahl


text: Youngdahls

title: Youngdahls


text: قوبور

title: قوبور


text:
aestetycznie

Etymology
From. .

Adverb

 * 1)  inaesthetically

title: aestetycznie


text:
ਕਾਦਰ

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) almighty, omnipotent, all-powerful

Noun

 * 1) Creator, God

title: ਕਾਦਰ


text:
till buds

Etymology
Frozen genitive from when governed the genitive.

Adverb

 * 1)  at one's disposal, at hand

title: till buds


text: Lillys

title: Lillys


text:
небӧг

Etymology
From. Borrowed from some Iranian source, compare, relative to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) book

title: небӧг


text:
aestetyczność

Etymology
From. .

Noun

 * 1)  lack of aesthetics

title: aestetyczność


text:
aestetyczny

Etymology
From. .

Adjective

 * 1) inaesthetic

title: aestetyczny


text: Template:RQ:Jonson Discoveries/documentation


text: Category:mk:Woodworking

title: Category:mk:Woodworking


text: Wiktionary:Word of the day/2023/August 1


text:
tottu

Etymology
From, alteration of Classical , of uncertain origin.

Determiner

 * 1)  all

Pronoun

 * 1) everything, all
 * 2) anything

Adverb

 * 1) entirely, quite
 * 2) all over

title: tottu


text:
pipsvängen

Usage notes
Fairly quaint.

title: pipsvängen


text: Citations:aetyczność

title: Citations:aetyczność


text:
shoesies

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  Shoes.

title: shoesies


text:
Talk:beat-match

This is not a noun
You are defining it as an alternative form of beatmatch. Beatmatch, as shown on its page, is a verb. Thus beat-match should only exist as a verb, unless you can find attestations of it as a noun. Simmo333333 (talk) 19:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you talking to yourself? No one but you has ever edited the entry. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Lol. Think I'm getting confused between the multiple beatmatch/beat-match/beat match articles and their plurals.
 * But someone created one of those as a noun, which I changed to a verb, and I thought someone had then changed it back.
 * Anyway, it's now just beat-match and beat-matches that are wrong, so I'll correct those. Simmo333333 (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:beat-match


text: lyllot

title: lyllot


text: lyllon

title: lyllon


text: lyllona

title: lyllona


text:
aetyczny

Etymology
From. .

Adjective

 * 1) anethical

title: aetyczny


text:
międzygwiazdowy

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  interstellar, intersidereal

title: międzygwiazdowy


text: fetman

title: fetman


text: rubster

title: rubster


text:
User talk:Geographyinitiative

Mawan
Hello. I doubt that the etymology of the island in Hong Kong is from Mandarin. The earliest British maps usually referred to it as Mah-wan, and the form Ma Wan first appeared in a 1904 map (and is the modern spelling, hence should be the main form); judging by the date it is very likely this name is from Cantonese, the dominant language in the region at the time. Also, please try to properly cite the form without the space (the last two quotes support Ma Wan not Mawan), or else I might have to send it to RFV. – Wpi31 (talk) 09:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Check out Mawan and Citations:Ma Wan now; I will look for Mawan cites. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 09:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

About citing place names in Hong Kong
Hi, I've noticed that you added many cites to Shau Kei Wan. Official and common place names like these don't need to be cited IMO given the amount of news articles that mention them probably goes into the thousands. I'm generally more concerned on citing less common alt forms and names of minor features (hills, villages, creeks…), since these are way more likely to be challenged at an RFV/RFD. Of course, any sort of contribution is always appreciated. – Wpi31 (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, I added something to Sau Kei Wan in . Let me know if you'd like to focus on any areas in particular. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. That's some wonderful work you've done there. I might as well warn you that there are still many, many, many, many place names to be added – I've only went through maybe a fifth of the list of major place names that I could think of without looking at a map, not to mention the minor ones. – Wpi31 (talk) 17:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 哪裡，哪裡，一般般！ Please do add everything you want to that you think could potentially reach Attestation! --Geographyinitiative (talk) 17:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Re:difference between the jyutping and romanisation
Generally speaking the place names follow the, which is a incoherent system based on the Eitel and Dyer Ball systems. There's quite a number of exceptions and I don't really bother distinguishing them apart. – Wpi31 (talk) 01:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You have done a lot of good work, so keep doing what you think you can do. Over time, if there are answers, they will become more apparent. As Wiktionary becomes stronger, stronger editors will be attracted who can attempt to answer more difficult questions. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 02:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Log your contributions?
May I log your citation collection at Citations:transgender in the campaign at en:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride/2023? I think a broader audience would like to see this.  Blue Rasberry  (talk)  19:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure! Sounds good to me! --Geographyinitiative (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Incomplete old US Army map for Tieling
I am a native of this area. The old US Army map you have added in May 2020 is incomplete. Namely, in that map, only the county-level subdivision "Tieling" and the district subdivision "Yinzhou" of the prefecture-level city "Tieling" is in that map. Both county-level subdivision "Kaiyuan", county-level subdivision "Xifeng" and district subdivision "Qinghe" is missing. The missing area accounts for more than half of the total area of the modern-day Tieling City. This is a reflection of the fact that this particular map produced by the US Army is directly based on the data provided by Japanese-fascist-militarist invaders. Regards. 89.245.157.175 13:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

 * Yes, in order for people to access the knowledge about the area in English from the period, a map can guide the reader with various terms used and locations identified. We cannot cut ourselves off from the past, the only question is if we allow ourselves to look at it, or if we ignore it. Even any errors or omissions on the map could have unexpected value to a researcher. This is true history, the early interactions between East and West. Geographyinitiative (talk) 14:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

o
Don't know why we "click" but I sometimes think you're the closest person to me in terms of actual project operation. Now don't get too happy. Poor Equinox will never learn Chinese. Equinox ◑ 10:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * For me, editing on this website is an incredible learning experience. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You should be worried by Equinox's comment, GI P. Sovjunk (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * One day I will be banned from this website because I am too stupid and foolhardy. Either that or circumstances will stop me. I apologize for my errors. Thanks for working with me. Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

 * (Then Appendix:Mass Effect happened.) Equinox ◑ 04:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If that page is really out of scope on Wiktionary, it will need to be deleted of course, and that's no problem. I just thought it was in scope, and I was probably wrong! --Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Signatures
Hi, following your comments at User_talk:JMGN, would you be able to kindly point me to "the rules and policies of WMF" that may relate to signatures? In short, is it just a matter of, say, not defaming and not using obscenities? Or perhaps also not masquerading as someone else? —DIV (49.186.112.234 06:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC))
 * I can't really remember, but I'm generally on board with this kind of viewpoint: Wiktionary_talk:Signatures --Geographyinitiative (talk) 08:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. —DIV (49.186.112.234 01:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC))

Many Thanks!
Season's Greetings!!! Cheers! Shir-El too (talk) 08:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

新年快乐
新年快乐！感谢您孜孜不倦地整理图书！

維基小霸王 04:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Appendix:Largest cities in China
Hey Joggy! Did you know about Appendix:Largest cities in China? Could be useful for new entries... SpAway (talk) 23:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

opinion on 𑜏𑜦𑜂𑜫
Hello, Ahom term 𑜏𑜦𑜂𑜫 seems to be Cognate with Chinese term 神, the meaning of the word is Deity or God in both languages. Can I add it in the Etymology of 𑜏𑜦𑜂𑜫 as a cognate?? KhiLanTzi (talk) 09:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Add category to Commons books using spreadsheet
Thank you for categorizing books.

I uploaded a spreadsheet for categorizing books. The spreadsheet contains additional information within it. It has sheets for NDL books, zh and jp book categories.

Download the spreadsheet: You'll find the spreadsheet link here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VesiHBbjQD8D2b4_5qnYw_59J08rsjPF/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=114690240001680834038&rtpof=true&sd=true

Add categories: There are designated columns named "CAT_1", "CAT_2", and "CAT_3" where you can add new categories for the books. Be sure to only add new categories that don't already existing ones.

Share it back: Once you've added your categories, share the updated spreadsheet back with me. I will add by bot.

Important Note: I will assume you've double-checked your additions and won't be reviewing them for errors.

To avoid duplicate works, please leave a message about what you will be adding to avoid duplicate works: c:Commons_talk:Library_back_up_project. 維基小霸王 (talk) 12:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Geographyinitiative


text:
頂大

Verb

 * 1)  to play a hand with higher points than the final hand of another player in order to prevent them from winning

title: 頂大


text:
wer zu spät kommt, den bestraft das Leben

Etymology
lit. 'life will punish him who comes too late'. Generally believed to have been said by in East Berlin in the autumn of 1989, but the precise origin is unclear. According to some a loose translation or paraphrase, according to others a private remark later made public. At any rate the phrase was extensively quoted in West German media and quickly became proverbial.

Proverb

 * 1) it is important not to waste time and opportunity; some situations require bold decisions


text:
мось

Alternative forms
,

Adjective

 * 1) few

Adverb

 * 1) a little

title: мось


text:
tottu a

Etymology
lit. 'all and'. Compare 🇨🇬.

Pronoun

 * 1)  all (of them)

Determiner

 * 1)  all of

Usage notes

 * In pronunciation, it is often tott' a.

title: tottu a


text:
d'un côté

Adverb

 * 1)  in a way, in a sense
 * 2)  on the one hand
 * 1)  on the one hand

title: d'un côté


text:
e tottu

Etymology
lit. 'and all'.

Pronoun

 * 1)  ; myself, yourself, himself, herself, itself, ourselves, yourselves, themselves

title: e tottu


text: a tottu

title: a tottu


text:
Tashkenter

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A native or inhabitant of Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

title: Tashkenter


text: Tashkenters

title: Tashkenters


text:
Karakol

Etymology
.

Translations

 * Hungarian:
 * Kyrgyz:

title: Karakol


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/aɾlo/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/aɾnos/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/aɾos/4 syllables


text: rubsters

title: rubsters


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/andote/5 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/andole/5 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/andolo/5 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/andonos/5 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/andoos/5 syllables


text:
دہان

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  mouth
 * 2)  mouth, opening

title: دہان


text: acabame

title: acabame


text: acabate

title: acabate


text: acábale

title: acábale


text: acabale

title: acabale


text: acábalo

title: acábalo


text: acabalo

title: acabalo


text: acábala

title: acábala


text: acabala

title: acabala


text: acábanos

title: acábanos


text: acabanos

title: acabanos


text: acábales

title: acábales


text: acabales

title: acabales


text: acábalos

title: acábalos


text: acabalos

title: acabalos


text: acábalas

title: acábalas


text: acabalas

title: acabalas


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abame

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abame


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abame/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abate

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abate


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abate/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abale

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abale


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abale/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abalo/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abala

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abala


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abala/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abanos

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abanos


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abanos/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abales

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abales


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abales/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abalos/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abalas

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abalas


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abalas/4 syllables


text: acábeme

title: acábeme


text: acábele

title: acábele


text: acábelo

title: acábelo


text: acábela

title: acábela


text: acábenos

title: acábenos


text: acábeles

title: acábeles


text: acábelos

title: acábelos


text: acábelas

title: acábelas


text:
Ikẹja

Etymology
From  Joint Administration

Proper noun

 * 1) one of Lagos State's 20 local government areas
 * 1) one of Lagos State's 20 local government areas

title: Ikẹja


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abeme

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abeme


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abeme/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abele

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abele


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abele/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelo

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelo


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelo/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abela

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abela


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abela/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abese

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abese


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abese/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenos

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenos


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenos/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abeles/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abeles

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abeles


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelos

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelos


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelos/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelas

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelas


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abelas/4 syllables


text: beorna

title: beorna


text: acabémoste

title: acabémoste


text: acabémosle

title: acabémosle


text: acabémoslo

title: acabémoslo


text: acabémosla

title: acabémosla


text: acabémoos

title: acabémoos


text: acabémosles

title: acabémosles


text: acabémoslos

title: acabémoslos


text: acabémoslas

title: acabémoslas


text: acabadme

title: acabadme


text: acabadle

title: acabadle


text: acabadlo

title: acabadlo


text: acabadla

title: acabadla


text: acabadnos

title: acabadnos


text: acabadles

title: acabadles


text: acabadlos

title: acabadlos


text: acabadlas

title: acabadlas


text: acábenme

title: acábenme


text: acábenle

title: acábenle


text: acábenlo

title: acábenlo


text: acábenla

title: acábenla


text: acábennos

title: acábennos


text: acábenles

title: acábenles


text: acábenlos

title: acábenlos


text: acábenlas

title: acábenlas


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abemme

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abemme


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abemme/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenle/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenle

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenle


text:
Apapa

Proper noun

 * 1) one of Lagos State's 20 local government areas

title: Apapa


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlo

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlo


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlo/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenla

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenla


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenla/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abennos

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abennos


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abennos/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenles

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenles


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenles/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlos

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlos


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlos/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlas

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlas


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abenlas/4 syllables


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abense

title: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abense


text: Category:Rhymes:Spanish/abense/4 syllables


text: Category:its:Chemical elements

title: Category:its:Chemical elements


text:
Talk:Cambrian

Esoteric but interesting
There is a lamentable shortage of translations here, possibly because the topic is too esoteric, possibly because people don't see any use in listing names for the Cambrian period in lesser languages.

The lack of a pronunciation for the Mandarin Chinese and any entry at all for Japanese was particularly lamentable.

First, it failed to show that the Chinese "hánwǔ" is weirdly divergent from the English.

Secondly, it failed to show why. With the old Japanese orthography added, the source of the Chinese name is immediately apparent. As the Chinese Wikipedia article points out:

中文名称源自旧时日本人使用日语汉字音读的音译名“寒武纪”（日语：寒武紀 kanbuki）.

More translations from other languages would be appreciated.

Bathrobe (talk) 20:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cambrian


text:
аоре

Noun

 * 1)  freedom

Derived terms

 * adjectives: аорев

title: аоре


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/kъlykъ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fang, tusk

Descendants

 * East Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * West Slavic:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/kъlykъ


text: ganga med på

title: ganga med på


text:
böylə

Etymology
See.

Determiner

 * 1) such; like this

Adverb

 * 1) so; in this way

title: böylə


text:
പ്രോത്സാഹന

Adjective

 * 1) encouraging
 * 2) consolational

title: പ്രോത്സാഹന


text:
khòrn

Etymology
From, from , from , from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  grain

title: khòrn


text:
പങ്കാളിത്തം

Noun

 * 1) partnering; participation
 * 2) partnership

title: പങ്കാളിത്തം


text: khôrndar

title: khôrndar


text:
പങ്കെടുക്കൽ

Noun

 * 1) participation; act of participating

title: പങ്കെടുക്കൽ


text:
otillräknelig

Adjective

 * 1)  non compos mentis, mentally incompetent (unable to properly judge one's actions (due to mental illness or the like) and therefore not responsible for them)

title: otillräknelig


text:
khôrnle

Etymology
. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) kernel, grain

title: khôrnle


text:
bərnamə

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  program
 * 2) a set of structured activities.
 * 3)  A set of principle goals which are supported by a political party or individual candidate
 * 4)  a performance of a show or other broadcast on radio or television
 * 5)  plan;
 * 1)  a performance of a show or other broadcast on radio or television
 * 2)  plan;
 * 1)  plan;

title: bərnamə


text: khôrnlen

title: khôrnlen


text:
T-shirty

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of a T-shirt.

title: T-shirty


text: tee-shirty

title: tee-shirty


text: t-shirty

title: t-shirty


text:
തിരഞ്ഞെടുക്കുക

Verb

 * 1) To elect
 * 2) To select

title: തിരഞ്ഞെടുക്കുക


text:
tillräknelig

Etymology
From, in the sense of "that can have a thing (like a crime) counted to them."

Adjective

 * 1)  compos mentis, sane, accountable (able to properly judge one's actions and therefore responsible for them)

title: tillräknelig


text: otillräkneligt

title: otillräkneligt


text: tillräkneligt

title: tillräkneligt


text: otillräkneliga

title: otillräkneliga


text: tillräkneliga

title: tillräkneliga


text:
തുരിശ്

Noun

 * 1) copper sulfate

title: തുരിശ്


text:
nisvan

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  women

title: nisvan


text:
khòrp

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  body

title: khòrp


text: Category:Cimbrian terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *krep-


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Tai/p.qaːjᴬ

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬 and, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to sell

Descendants

 * Northern Tai
 * Central Tai
 * Southwestern Tai
 * Central Tai
 * Southwestern Tai
 * Southwestern Tai

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Tai/p.qaːjᴬ


text:
User:Asamoah Daniel Kwame Oware

I am in the person of Asamoah Daniel Kwame Oware, a student of KNUST

title: User:Asamoah Daniel Kwame Oware


text:
പൂമ്പാറ്റ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) butterfly

title: പൂമ്പാറ്റ


text: Category:tai-pro:Feces

title: Category:tai-pro:Feces


text: Category:tai-pro:Toilet (room)

title: Category:tai-pro:Toilet (room)


text: Category:tai-pro:Health

title: Category:tai-pro:Health


text: Category:tai-pro:Hygiene

title: Category:tai-pro:Hygiene


text: Category:tai-pro:Rooms

title: Category:tai-pro:Rooms


text: Category:tai-pro:Architecture

title: Category:tai-pro:Architecture


text: Category:tai-pro:Buildings and structures


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Tai/C̬.qɯjꟲ

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬, Proto-Kra *kaiꟲ and 🇨🇬 (whence haːj³ in most modern lects). Compare also 🇨🇬 (whence 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬),  (B-S).

Noun

 * 1) excrement

Descendants

 * Northern Tai
 * Southwestern Tai
 * Southwestern Tai
 * Southwestern Tai

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Tai/C̬.qɯjꟲ


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Tai/χɯnꟲ

Verb

 * 1) to ascend

Descendants

 * Northern Tai
 * Southwestern Tai
 * Southwestern Tai
 * Southwestern Tai

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Tai/χɯnꟲ


text:
പ്രഭാഷണം

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) lecture
 * 2) speech

title: പ്രഭാഷണം


text: Category:sk:Woodworking

title: Category:sk:Woodworking


text:
alicunu

Etymology
From from  +. .

Determiner

 * 1)  someone

title: alicunu


text: inşa et

title: inşa et


text:
പര്യവേക്ഷണം

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) exploration
 * 2) research

title: പര്യവേക്ഷണം


text:
alcunu

Etymology
Likely a borrowing from. .

Determiner

 * 1)  someone

title: alcunu


text: Category:Sardinian rare terms

title: Category:Sardinian rare terms


text: هاداق کفی

title: هاداق کفی


text:
humbuggy

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of a humbug.

title: humbuggy


text: snirkligt

title: snirkligt


text:
algunu

Etymology
Likely a borrowing from. .

Determiner

 * 1)  someone

title: algunu


text: Category:Adyghe terms derived from Khitan


text: Category:Sardinian apocopic forms

title: Category:Sardinian apocopic forms


text: Category:Sardinian clippings

title: Category:Sardinian clippings


text: Category:Sardinian shortenings

title: Category:Sardinian shortenings


text: hithers and thithers

title: hithers and thithers


text: hithering and thithering

title: hithering and thithering


text: hithered and thithered

title: hithered and thithered


text: Category:Sardinian article forms

title: Category:Sardinian article forms


text: Category:Sardinian determiner forms

title: Category:Sardinian determiner forms


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2023/April 2


text: Category:sla-pro:Woodworking

title: Category:sla-pro:Woodworking


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/tesařь

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) carpenter

Descendants

 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * Middle
 * West Slavic:
 * Middle
 * West Slavic:
 * Middle
 * Middle
 * Middle
 * Middle
 * Middle

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/tesařь


text:
Krummsäbel

Noun

 * 1) scimitar

title: Krummsäbel


text:
Talk:plastique

The Terminator
This word appears in the original Terminator film.—-Overlordnat1 (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:plastique


text:
jet-setty

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to the jet set.

title: jet-setty


text: jetsetty

title: jetsetty


text:
normal hydrogen

Noun

 * 1) The normal isotope of hydrogen: hydrogen-1, or protium

Coordinate terms

 * deuterium
 * tritium

title: normal hydrogen


text: istuussa

title: istuussa


text:
khortz

Etymology
From, from , from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, also 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1)  short, brief

title: khortz


text:
lägga manken till

Etymology
From, in reference to an ox beginning to push against a yoke with its withers.

Verb

 * 1)  to put a lot of effort into something (one previously did not put a lot of effort into), to put one's back into something, to put one's mind to something

title: lägga manken till


text: lägger manken till

title: lägger manken till


text: la manken till

title: la manken till


text: lade manken till

title: lade manken till


text: lagt manken till

title: lagt manken till


text: lägg manken till

title: lägg manken till


text: Category:be:Muscicapids

title: Category:be:Muscicapids


text:
بے ترتیب

Etymology
..

Adjective

 * 1) disarranged, disorderly, irregular

title: بے ترتیب