text:
User talk:Remuel

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:19, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Possible Puzzle for your User Page
The following was presented by George Boolos in the Harvard Review of Philosophy, 1996.

Three Gods, A B and C, are called, in some order, True False and Random. True always speaks truly, False always speaks falsely, but whether Random speaks truly or falsely is a completely random matter. Your task is to determine the identities of A, B and C by asking three yes-no questions; each question must be put to exactly one God. The Gods understand English, but will answer all questions in their own language, in which the words for 'yes' and 'no' are 'da' and 'ja', in some order. You do not know which word means which.

Good luck on this one. It's really hard. If you need a hint, ask on my talk page. (c; Oh, and btw, thanks for the sci-stub fixes; I wasn't sure where to classify entries on modal logic -- now that you've pointed it out, sci-stub seems a rather obvious choice. -  Eric Herboso  03:40, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Hint #1: Notice that while each question must be put to exactly one god, there is no proviso against one god receicving more than one question.
 * Hint #2: Notice there is no proviso that all three questions must be asked simultaneously; your second (and consequently your third) question may depend upon the answer you receive to the first.
 * Hint #3: Notice that Random will answer either 'da' or 'ja' when asked any yes-no questions. (That might be obvious, but it is a powerful hint anyway.)
 * George Boolos, by the way, entitled this puzzle's submission to the Harvard Review of Philosophy as "The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever". Good luck.  (c;  - Eric Herboso  01:44, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi there!
Thanks for chiming in to help my first article. Maybe we can talk a little more? What's your aim/e-mail? Draconiator 00:03, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Andrea Bowen
Hey, Forbsey here. I used the Actor category for Andrea Bowen but it is better to use her nationallity (i.e. [Category:American actors]. Do you know what nationality she is? Forbsey 19:26, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

gloves? Bluemoose 14:30, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Anne Treisman
thanks for the correct stub template. So "psych-stub" it is. ben 06:47, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Bay rum
A relevent note is at Talk:Bay rum. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 23:41, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Like the riddles.
Got any more? :-)

• Thorpe • 21:56, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * How does a placenta lead armies? I'm dense! ~ Dpr 05:44, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Rem, thanks for the feedback. Um...maybe placenta is not actually the correct answer. My first thought is, and still remains, "a woman." ~ Dpr 01:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 14:47, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Mind Benders
Hello! I've noticed your past interest in Mind Benders and wanted to let you know that round one is now officially open! Consisting of ten challenging, puzzling questions, it is sure to be tons of WikiFun! In addition, take a look at all 9 of our great artistic entries and vote for one of them! Hope to see you there! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 16:26, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

Mind Benders
Hello,. Thank you for submitting an entry to the pre-round and/or participating in round one of WP:MIND. I sincerly hope you enjoyed it. Round Two, which I have made a bit more difficult than round one, will open at approximately 2 PM EST, Sunday, July 24. In addition, the voting for pre-round has also been extended until the end of round two. I hope to see you at Round Two, so prepare for some WikIFun!!! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 17:13, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Stub templates
Thanks for fixing the stub templates on several of my articles. -- Wackymacs 15:12, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

WP:MIND 22:07, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for participating in Round Two of the Mind Benders! The round will officially close on Friday, September 16, and round three (which is complete) will be open in the immediate days after that. A notice will be sent to you at least 48 hours before round three is set to open, to insure fairness. Round three offers 11 new exciting questions, this time written by Deryck C.. Please be sure to join in the fun! Also, congratulations to Riffsyphon1024 for winning our logo competition! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 22:07, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

WP:MIND 06:18, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello, ! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:18, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

WP:MIND 06:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello, ! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

WP:MIND 06:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello, ! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

WP:MIND
Hello. Round four of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Thursday, December 1. This round will be drastically different from round three; part one will consist of a creative project, and part two will be developed from there. The full details will be released when the round opens. Time and speed should not be major factors in this round; thus, there is no exact opening time for the round as speed will not factor into the scoring. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 22:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Please add Mind Benders/to do to your watchlist to receive further announcements; the NotificationBot is currently down and all notifications will be placed on that page. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy. If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. Special thanks to Fetofs for helping distribute this message.

Please check your WP:NA entry
Greetings, editor! Your name appears on List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct: Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 03:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
 * 2) If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
 * 3) Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Riddle
I'm the beginning of every end, the end of every place, the beginning of eternity, the end of time and space.

What am I?N734LQ (talk) 09:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brian Giovannini
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brian Giovannini, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern:
 * Notability not verified. All Google hits for ""Brian Giovannini" "postage due"" appear to be mirrors of the Wikipedia article, or self-published sources such as wikis. The impressive number of mirrors is due to the article's creation date: 2003...

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Edcolins (talk) 19:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Remuel


text:
Talk:Terrestrial television

Stratavision
There does not appear to be any knowledge to date about Stratavision - television broadcasting by planes. It has been used on several occasions in the USA before microwave links and satell ites and it was also used in Vietnam by AFRTS and other locations. MPLX/MH 21:20, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Definition Wrong?
Isn't "terrestrial television" simply the opposite of "satellite television"? i.e. doesn't the term include cable since this is also an earthbound medium?

BTW, the term is almost never used in the US. Tmangray 15:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

 * At least here (the UK), the term does not include cable; "terrestrial" is used as a synonym for "via an aerial", and includes both old-fashioned analogue services and Freeview (digital TV via an aerial). I don't know whether there is a direct US equivalent - "free to air" wouldn't work, since there are free satellite services and subscription digital terrestrial services. Loganberry (Talk) 13:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * In the US, what you get over an antenna (almost no one in the US would call it an "aerial") is called "broadcast" television. Seems to mean the same thing as you mean by "terrestrial".76.226.120.211 (talk) 05:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Such use cannot make sense, because the phase "broadcast television" quite obviously has to mean "television that is broadcast" (as opposed to "narrowcast" or closed circuit), and therefore must include all satellite television. If the term is used as you say then it invited confusion and I am glad we have adopted the term terrestrial in the UK. --Memestream (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Such use cannot make sense, because the phase "terrestrial television" quite obviously has to mean "television that is from earth" (as opposed to "extraterrestrial television" or satellite), and therefore must include all cable television. If the term is used as you say then it invited confusion and I am glad we have adopted the term broadcast in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.30.220.43 (talk) 16:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with user 76.226.120.211. "Broadcast" is and has been the standard term in the U.S. for non-cable, non-satellite television. Who cares what other countries call it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.59.3.196 (talk) 00:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

 * The term appears to be made up WP:NEO. I'm old enough (1960s and beyond) to remember the vast majority of the last 50 years.  I watched a lot of TV, including older shows (back to the early 1950s), and the term used -- ubiquitously -- to describe any and all programming disseminated via radio waves, whether analog or digital, was "broadcast television."  I lived in England for a short time in 1992, and no one on television ever said "terrestrial television" or "terrestrial broadcast."  They said, simply, "broadcast," as in, "We now return to your regularly scheduled broadcast" or "Welcome to our broadcast."  From its incept through at least the 2010s, cable television was never considered a "broadcast," as that term was relegated to programming broadcast via radio waves, either VHF or UHF, a category which included digital television when it came into being.  I would change the "Broadcast systems" section to "Distribution system," change "Terrestrial television" to "Broadcast television," and rewrite the all three sub-sections under Distribution systems accordingly in order to get rid of the "terrestrial television" neologism WP:NEO. Clepsydrae (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Memestream 2806:230:203E:BDE0:F5CA:E35:97E0:4122 (talk) 19:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

POV
This whole article is complete subjectivity POV commentary: "underwent a revolutionary transformation" "Suddenly found itself under attack". Lets stick to the facts and history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.15.255.227 (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Return channel
For return channel is required bi-directional antenna system to switch between the broadcast mode and receiving mode. Simple one-way receiving facility does NOT provide a return channel, therefore interaction/invigilation doesn't occur. Everything is described here: http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301900_301999/301958/01.01.01_60/en_301958v010101p.pdf 41.223.52.234 (talk) 09:05, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Over-the-air internet
Is there an article for Over-the-air internet?--Wyn.junior (talk) 01:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Transmitter
"Some older cathode ray tube television sets have a built-in transmitter." Really? I'm 99.9% sure this is total BS. W\|/haledad (Talk to me) 01:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Opinion on DTT
Please don't be using Wikipedia as a soapbox. Stating unsubstantiated claims about analog being potentially better than digital in a hurricane needs to be backed up with citable evidence. DojoIrl (talk) 03:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC) DojoIrl (talk) 03:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

missing refernce
Cited item at no. 2 is defunct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF99:2080:7468:125E:EDCA:3DB1 (talk) 19:03, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Are you guys sure that "terrestrial" a common term in Latin America?
This article states that "The term 'terrestrial' is more common in Europe and Latin America..." than it is in the US. Are you guys sure about that? Because, not only I have never heard anyone using this term here in Brazil, but also had no idea said term even existed to begin with; if my experience counts as source or the like, then I assure you guys that it is not a common term here. Now, is this a common term in other Latin American countries? If I were to guess, I would say it is not.

See... Were "terrestrial television" be a common term in Latin America, as this article states, Wikipedia would probably have an article written about it in Spanish; however, it has not. Furthermore, its Portuguese article on this subject would probably not be only a partial translation of this one, and would probably have not excluded from the translated text the statement about "terrestrial" term being common in the aforementioned place.

So, I would say the quoted statement should be deleted from this article. 186.223.242.220 (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

As long as the U.S. term is deprecated,Wikipedia's pundits are satisfied.

Univision
Spanish TV Programing 2601:586:C800:31B0:7008:B24C:55CB:52EB (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Terrestrial television


text:
Talk:Tony Award for Best Book of a Musical

Untitled
I added this page with just a bare-bones list of winners, sticking to the format used on, for example, Tony Award for Best Musical. If you want to edit it, please don't change the bold, but add the nominees in non-bold as is done on that page. Don't change the bold just to change it, please.Kevin M Marshall 21:21, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Formatting of list
There isn't a standardisation on these types of lists, but I have a couple of alternatives.

 * University of Canterbury Drama Society

This is a page I worked on quite a bit. As you can see, each year is a level 3 heading ( === ). This would allow the nominees and the winner to separate lists:

2000

 * Winner: Lord of the Ring-dings, by someone
 * Nominees
 * Lord of the Ring-a-dings, by a pirate
 * Lord of the Ring-a-dings 2, by a pirate 2

Alternatively, we could use the same format, but just bold the winner (as before):

2000

 * Lord of the Ring-dings, by someone
 * Lord of the Ring-a-dings, by a pirate
 * Lord of the Ring-a-dings 2, by a pirate 2

But I'm fine with the current layout.

The only issue with not putting the winner into the list with the nominees that I have is that it's a bit like saying:

1999 I ate a pie
 * I didn't eat a pie

From what I can see, there isn't any real emphasis or reason to 'promote' the film any higher than it should. It's because it's already bolded; perhaps it has enough emphasis already.

But then again, I know absolutely nothing about this topic, so if anyone thinks that the current layout is fine, that's fine with me. - x42bn6  Talk  06:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

I changed the format slightly by putting level 3 headings for each decade. The problem with doing them for each year (like the University of Canterbury Drama Society article) is that you get a very long and somewhat ugly table of contents. I totally understand your point about eating a pie and separating the winners like that, but while that makes logical sense I just don't think it makes the winner pop out enough.Kevin M Marshall 15:54, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * A slightly more sightly alternative is to make the list a separate article (List of Tony Award winners or something). But either way, I don't really know...  I sometimes wish there was a standard for these issues.  - x42bn6   Talk  10:39, 2 October 2005 (UTC)


text:
User:Adar~enwiki

An Israeli lawyer.

title: User:Adar~enwiki


text:
User talk:Cmc0

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:21, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

PJ Patterson image
Hi. I noticed that you are the person who uploaded the image of PJ Patterson. I also noticed the google watermark on the image, and the fact that the file has no information about copyright. Could you supply the information please? Thanks. Guettarda 13:03, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mapbig.jpg
This map would appear to be a copyvio from the Daily Telegraph. Do you have information on whether it has been released from copyright or are you claiming fair use? If so, how is it fair use? Dbiv 08:17, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

VfD
Removing "Votes for Deletion" notice is a disruption of wikipedia; inadmissible. Mikkalai 03:28, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Tony Blair
Why do you keep reverting to the 10 year old image of Tony Blair? That is a copyrighted non-free image and shouldn't be used at Wikipedia, especially not when there is a free (and also much newer) image available. /Jebur 1 July 2005 21:54 (UTC)

Copyright conditions on Michaelle Jean picture
Hi! Please see Image_talk:20050804-116.jpg. Thanks. --Doradus 18:24, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Unsourced quote removal
Hello Cmc0,

Regarding your removal of a Paul Martin quote, citing the reason as it being unsourced; are there two metrics at use in determining which unsourced quotes will be removed, and which will not? I cannot help but notice that an existing, unsourced quote escaped your editorial scrutiny. Please feel free to advise me on any relevant policies, and procedures regarding selective, unsourced information removal.

I thank you for your time.

Best regards,

Ray --Daystrom 22:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Moving pages
Always move pages by using the special move button in the top of the page. Don't cut and paste text to a new page. When you do such (like you did for FCC), the page editing history is left, and easily lost in the previous location. Such is unfortunate because then people get inaccurate information on who has written a page. Attribution is required by GNU Free Documentation License. If you can't move a page, then contact an administrator. Now I had to contact an admin to correct your mistake, which I had discoverd by a sheer luck. -Hapsiainen 16:40, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Orleans ray nagin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Orleans ray nagin.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Shanel 19:11, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:CoachK.jpg
You uploaded Image:CoachK.jpg but did not cite a source or state its copyright status. If you would, please edit the image's page to reflect this information. If the information is not provided, the image may be deleted seven days from now. Thank you. --Durin 14:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Isharon.jpg
Instead of reverting, I will try and explain what is going on. The reason why I replaced this photo with Image:Ariel Sharon.jpg is that the latter image is from the United States Government, which puts their work into the public domain upon creation, if it was made during official work. From what I was told, fair use images should be limited as much as possible, so that was why I replaced Image:Isharon.jpg with the image from the US Government. While it is good that Image:Isharon.jpg is sourced and it's fair use claim is cited, but an image in the public domain, IMHO, should be used instead of a fair use image. Regards, Zach (Sound Off) 05:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok. While I did not get my reply from the Kenesant, I found a photo at http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2003/2/Ariel+Sharon.htm. Do you wish to use this? Personally, I will like to rename this image to Image:Ariel Sharon.jpg, but I want to wait to see what you think. Zach (Sound Off) 05:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * One more thing, will it be ok to delete Image:Isharon.jpg? Zach (Sound Off) 05:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The photo you uploaded at Image:Ariel Sharon.jpg is the same photo that is above this post. There is a copy at the Commons already for some reason, so the image is still present. Also, the photo you uploaded has a poor quality, so that was why I reverted. Zach (Smack Back) Fair use policy 23:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Person
Your change to the image size has been undone a couple times now. Please make use of the talk page and describe why you feel the change is necessary. Otherwise, leave it be. -- Netoholic @ 03:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

 * You've been warned once. Further un-discussed changes will not go over well. If a specific image in an article looks bad, contact me and I will find an alternative.  -- Netoholic @ 03:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:SenatorJonCorzine.jpg
Hello, May you please update the copyright tag for the image: Image:SenatorJonCorzine.jpg. -- ZeWrestler  Talk 00:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Template:Canadian federal election, 2006
I have started a poll on using full party names or short forms on this template. PLease vote at Talk:Canadian federal election, 2006. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 23:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

John-Boehner.png
Thanks for the John-Boehner.png image. Just wanted to know where you got it from. ~ Cheers —This user has left wikipedia 23:45 2006-02-02

Image Tagging Image:Coachkbobknight.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Coachkbobknight.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Une4153.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Une4153.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Dethomas 02:46, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

NB legislature standings
I am going to assume that you changed the Liberals up to 27 because the CP story today erroneously reports that the standings are 27-27. Here is another news article with the correct information. The Liberals won 26 seats in the last election, picked one up in a Nov. by-election but then lost one when one of their members sat as an indpendent in January. - Jord 20:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Balken.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Balken.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.  Soothing R  20:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:20050708-173.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:20050708-173.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Martin_Ahern.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Martin_Ahern.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:London bombers.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:London bombers.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mark83 20:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Str_Mar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Str_Mar.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 19:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:GSchroeder.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GSchroeder.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Hu Jintao, Nov 13, 2004.jpg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hu Jintao, Nov 13, 2004.jpg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 21:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Mayor Street.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mayor Street.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Philadelphia photo
In case you haven't seen the discussion at Talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania lately, you might want to come join in. We'd love to have more opinions. -- JVinocur 19:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Tim Kaine Image
Please stop reverting that image to the different image which is also of lower resolution. If you want it to be in the article, upload it as a different file. --tomf688 (talk - email) 14:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

 * In fact, I just noticed the image you keep reverting to is located here: Image:Kaine-StatePortrait.jpg. I also noticed you participated in the discussion and that you are aware that photo exists.  I encourage you to stop reverting that image as I have no choice but to interpret your actions as bad faith edits.  Thanks. --tomf688 (talk - email) 14:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Sony Playstation 3.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Sony Playstation 3.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. HenryFlower 22:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:John-Boehner.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:John-Boehner.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Weah-01.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Weah-01.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:27, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:HarpeS.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:HarpeS.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Sherool (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Corzineswornin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Corzineswornin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Fullchamber.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fullchamber.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Image problem
Thanks for uploading Image:Rklein.jpg. However, you claim it has been licensed under the GFDL. This is not the case. As you have already pointed out, it is crown copyright. This image is now marked for deletion as the license is incorrect. --Yamla 15:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Angela Merkel.jpg
Please do not revert to the version with the peach suit and the "busy" background :-). See the pic's discussion page for the reason. Thank you -- Boereck 19:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Paulmartin.jpg
Please do not replace a free image with a fair use image. What is really bad, is you uploaded over top the old image, hiding the free image. This is quite a serious offense. Do not do it again. --Rob 06:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Str Mar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Str Mar.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 20:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

United States Senate elections, 2006
Hello -- I'm glad to see you actively participating in United States Senate elections, 2006. However, I've noticed that you have been assigning RED and BLUE colors to some "tossup" races instead of the neutral "purple". On the talk page for that article, there is some discussion about how to color the chart -- it would be great if you could join that discussion so we can reach consensus on the color scheme to use. In the meantime, I will return the TOSSUP seats to purple, for consistency. Thesmothete 22:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Jp2mozzeta.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jp2mozzeta.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Megapixie 02:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Political offices
Politicans retain their seats until the end of their terms. In the case of U.S. representatives and senators, the nex session of Congress begins on January 3 2007. Incumbents retains their seats until then. Please don't change succession boxes until then. Thanks, -Will Beback 05:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Rodblagojevich.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rodblagojevich.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Senator Lieberman on the Connecticut Page
I noticed you changed Sen. Lieberman to be a democrat on the Connecticut page. We currently have a discussion about that topic on the Talk:Connecticut page. As of yet, there is no consensus. The news media is currently referring to him as an Independent. I am going to revert your change on the Connecticut page until such time as we have a consensus on the Talk page. Please join the conversation there. mikemillerdc 16:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blair EUPres 010705 Logo,0.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Blair EUPres 010705 Logo,0.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WJBscribe 20:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ed Rendell.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ed Rendell.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok  ☠  22:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Scr-freudenthalpic.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Scr-freudenthalpic.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chowbok  ☠  23:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

KS Gov
Hello, I was looking at your page on Kansas Gov. Sebelius. It is currently being tagged for deletion. Since you clearly went through the effort of contacting the governor's office or another agency for this image, it would be a shame if that happened. The tag that you placed on this image is incorrect. Change it, and everything will be good, ok? Basically, you've just gotta declare whether the gov't released this image into the public domain for you or whether it is a copyrighted image that allowed you to use as long as your sources were sighted. Please fix it, so the photo stays online. VitaleBaby 04:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Jennifer Granholm.jpg
This is not a work of the federal government and is not public domain. Please see the discussions at Talk:Jennifer Granholm and Image talk:Jennifer Granholm.jpg. older ≠ wiser 03:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jennifer Granholm.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Jennifer Granholm.jpg. However, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chowbok  ☠  03:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:20050804-116.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:20050804-116.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as or , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 21:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:20050804-116.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:20050804-116.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU ≈ talk 19:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Barak Ehud.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Barak Ehud.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WJBscribe (WJB talk) 02:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GSchroeder.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GSchroeder.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WJBscribe (WJB talk) 03:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:BeebeOfficialPicSmall.jpg
I noticed you uploaded the image Image:BeebeOfficialPicSmall.jpg with a fair use rationale. I've tagged this image as replaceable fair use since it violates WP's first fair use criterion. --tomf688 (talk - email) 02:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Peretz amir.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peretz amir.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Philadelphia mayoral election, 2007
Please do not remove the SD tag on this article. It is considered vandalism. Please add if you want to contest a deletion. Any further removal of the tag might result in a block. -- [|.K.Z|]  [|.Z.K|]   08:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Tim Kaine photo
Photos from virginia.gov are not public domain, nor most photos released by U.S. states. Please do not tag them as PD-USGov, since that is simply not the case. In case you have any doubt, I emailed the Virginia government a while ago regarding this issue for my own curiosity and received this response:

"...all photos of the governor which appear on his site are copyrighted by the Commonwealth of Virginia -- and therefore the state's copyright policy does apply: 'Any digital alteration, manipulation, or dissemination of these photos is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or exhibition for commercial or political purposes may violate federal laws.' In other words, commercial and non-educational uses are not kosher."

So please avoid using State Government photos. Thanks. --tomf688 (talk - email) 01:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Chet culver-med.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chet culver-med.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. tomf688 (talk - email) 23:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Please do not upload photographs that are copyrighted by others and claim that they are re-usable under the GFDL, as you did with Image:OMalleySpeech.jpg. Such actions are considered vandalism. The next time you upload a photograph with said inaccuracies, you risk being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Consider using public domain image sources rather than risking legal action against Wikipedia by uploading copyright violations. --Tom (talk - email) 15:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:AlGoreWin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AlGoreWin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:CaseySwornIn.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CaseySwornIn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Codey2007.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Codey2007.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tom (talk - email) 18:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:John Street.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:John Street.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Tom (talk - email) 21:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Kufuor2004.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kufuor2004.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:President.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:President.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Warning regarding removal of deletion templates
Per your actions on images Image:CONRAD GREGG.jpg and Image:CONRAD BUDGET.jpg, do not remove or other templates of similar nature, such as 🇳🇱 or , without providing what they are requesting. Doing so is considered counterproductive and warrants a block, so this is your final warning. Please help make Wikipedia a reliable source of information. Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 01:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Martin Ahern.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Martin Ahern.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 12:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AlGoreWin.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AlGoreWin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 10:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I have added a FU rationale to the image. Just thought you might want to know.  Also, I notice that a few image notices are on this page, so I thought you might want to check WP:FURG.  Happy editing. R. Baley 20:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Enda Kenny 1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Enda Kenny 1.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ilse@ 16:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Martin Ahern.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Martin Ahern.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ilse@ 10:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:John Street.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:John Street.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
 * Unless there is evidence from Temple University that this image may be used by anyone, for any reason, at any time and without permission, this is a non-free image. Tom (talk - email) 21:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Wards color.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wards color.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tom (talk - email) 21:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:JohnTurner.jpg
I have tagged Image:JohnTurner.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. DieInquisitor 21:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Marionbarry.jpg
I have tagged Image:Marionbarry.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 23:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SprintLogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SprintLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SANDERSWIN.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SANDERSWIN.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chirac_EU.jpg
I have tagged Image:Chirac_EU.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 19:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:20050708-173.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:20050708-173.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Blair logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Blair logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lamontlieberman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lamontlieberman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:20060206 cab01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:20060206 cab01.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --20:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Williams pavelic blue 000.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Williams pavelic blue 000.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Blair logo.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Blair logo.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. ViperSnake151 16:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Used one of your images
Hello, I am the webmaster of a few mobile computing-related web logs and wanted to tell you that I used one of your images: http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2008/12/14/handango-takes-mobile-apps-into-best-buy-stores/ http://tamsppc.tamoggemon.com/2008/12/14/handango-takes-mobile-apps-into-best-buy-stores/ http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/2008/12/14/handango-takes-mobile-apps-into-best-buy-stores/

In case you have any issues, please let me know at Tamog AT gmx DOT at!

Best regards & Thank You! Tam Hanna —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.74.20 (talk) 15:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AlGoreWin.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:AlGoreWin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kufuor2004.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kufuor2004.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:President.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:President.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Ministers of the Ghanaian Government listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ministers of the Ghanaian Government. Since you had some involvement with the Ministers of the Ghanaian Government redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Total-petrol-station.jpg

The file File:Total-petrol-station.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

"President of canada" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=President_of_canada&redirect=no President of canada] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cmc0


text:
Zipper (BDSM)

In BDSM terms, a zipper is a string of clothespins or other clips, held together loosely by a cord or light chain.

The skin is clipped in the clips for a short time, then the cord is pulled, causing the clips to be pulled off the skin one by one in rapid sequence causing a unique sensation. Zippers come in many sizes and with varied numbers of clips. They are a very popular home-made BDSM toy.

title: Zipper (BDSM)