text:
Talk:Israeli Air Force

JSF
i think there should be a part that covers the israeli involement in the JSF project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Topsecrete (talk • contribs) 21:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Questionable Information and POV
The section "Records and Highlights" should be just that - HIGHLIGHTS. It is not to be a running commentary on details of war. Look at how much is listed for, say the Six Day War, the Yom Kippur War, etc. There are wiki articles for each of those wars, this article is just about the Israeli Air Force.

That said, just about everything under "Israel-Lebanon Conflict: July 2006 - Present" is inappropriate to this article, no matter which side of the conflict you agree with. All that should be listed are RECORDS AND HIGHLIGHTS of the IAF. If someone wants to write about the "Israel-Lebanon Conflict: July 2006 - Present" they should write in the wiki article for that. As such, I am removing most of the comments under "Israel-Lebanon Conflict: July 2006 - Present"
 * But the criticism do represent a highlight... look at the USAF article. Its not a running commentary to put in criticism as long as they can sourced (which they can be). Keep in mind that you don't WP:OWN this article. Sasquatch t|c 19:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

 * There is an appropriate place to put in details about the conflict, and that is the article ABOUT the conflict, 2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict this section which keeps getting edited is about RECORDS AND HIGHLIGHTS. THAT'S IT.
 * But this is a HIGHLIGHT... again, look at the USAF ariticle... anyways, i say we eliminate that all together by just making this a history section, then we can include any sourced criticisms... Sasquatch t|c 22:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * How about adding to the "records and highlights" for every war, a listing of all details of those wars? Here's why: because each of those wars has their own wiki page. The reason I have a stick up my butt about this, is that there ar a ton of people monitoring the 2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict page to make sure it's balanced, but this page is one of those secondary pages that people don't notice. I GUARANTEE you that if the comments I just removed such as "the airstrikes are aimed at crippling Lebanon's growing economy" were in the main article, they would be deleted in about five seconds.

I looked through what I had written and corrected any words that may have even remotely appeared to you to have "proved Israel right on every object" (i.e.- changed stated to claimed). I think that we can agree that as it stands right now it is, if not completely unbiased, pretty close to being so.

And, by the way, I did not literally mean that I thought that you were interpreting NPOV as " Nasrallah's Point of View", it was sarcastic humor. Moparmatt 03:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I didn't meant NPOV for " Nasrallah's Point of View" but for [NPOV].The language you used, showed that you were proving israel right on every object.

First of all, put a space between your comment and that of others, please. It is much easier for everyone to read and discuss that way.

Second of all, I do not feel that saying what both sides claim is an Israeli POV. What I have written is from an objective POV, sharing both sides claims and reporting the facts of this conflict. You stated definitively that AIPAC was actively involved in a conspiracy to cover-up the crashes of Israeli jets... and you had no proof but an obviously kook conspiracy theory website to back it up. You also falsely attributed a statement to an Israeli official to make it seem that he valued his aircraft more than his soldiers.

Just to let you know, NPOV does not stand for " Nasrallah's Point of View", it stands for No Point of View. Moparmatt 21:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

So you have Israeli Pov instead of NPOV

As the individual earlier mentioned, of an Arab POV has reverted the article, I have edited it so that it is not full of anti-Israel conspiracies and rhetoric.

I have edited the section regarding the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah conflict, as the previous edits both distorted the facts distinctly towards Hezbollah, as well as provided non-factual information with citations that did not support these claims. Probably the most egregious example was this deliberate misquotation:

As an IDF Brigadier-General Alon Friedman told the Israeli paper Maariv: "It's possible that in the coming days our ground operations will increase. For this reason the strategy of IDF have been changed to ground attack instead of losing more aircraft to ground fire as these are much costly then whole group of soldiers."

The person who wrote this article was blatantly biased against Israel, as evidenced by the addition of a sickening statement, that a plane is more valuable than human lives, to the original quote.

Further evidence can be found in the individual's misuse of plural and singular tenses, as well as the exaggerations of the amount of casualties inflicted on the IAF.

Because this subject is related to, by participation in, the Arab-Israeli conflict, I've added {ARBPIA 1RR editnotice} to this page. RenaissongsMan 03:09, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Possible Copy Right infringement
The following * The Israeli Air Force is considered as the strongest air force is the Middle East and as one of the best and most sophisticated air forces in the world. The Israeli combat pilots are considered as the best in world, together with the American pilots, and hold a large number of shoot-downs records.

 * June 5, 1967 - the Six Day War: The destruction of the entire Egyptian air-force within 3 hours. By the end of the day the Syrian and Jordanian air forces were wiped out as well. The IAF achieved a total air-superiority for the rest of the war, that ended with an amazing victory for Israel. The IAF shoot-down total at the end of the war was a claimed record of 451 enemy aircraft downed versus of its own 10 downed. See: Operation Red Sheet.

 * Obtaining the first shoot-downs for the American fighter jets, the F-15 and the F-16.

 * 1981: The first and only attack in history of a nuclear reactor; The destruction of the Iraqi Osiraq nuclear reactor: Eight IAF F-16 fighters flew to Iraq and bombed the nuclear facilties of Osiraq. Among the pilots that took part in the attack was the late Ilan Ramon, Israel's first astronaut.

 * 1982: The destruction of the entire Soviet-Syrian air-defence system in Lebanon without a single warplane lost; Syria with the U.S.S.R built up an overlapping network of SAMs, and the density of SAM site locations was unmatched anywhere in the world including the U.S.S.R. itself. Also the IAF achieved in dogfights a total of 80 Syrian planes shoot-downs, without a single Israeli plane being shot down.

 * 1985: The bombing of PLO Headquarters in Tunis, Tunisia, the longest combat mission ever undertaken by the IAF.

 * The only documented emergency landing of an F-15 with only one wing. A few months later, the damaged F-15 had been given a new wing, and returned to operational duty in the squadron. The engineers at McDonnell Douglas had a hard time believing the story of the one-winged landing: as far as their planning models were concerned, this was an impossibility.
 * In the United States Air Force and the air forces of several European countries, an ace is a pilot who has shot down 5 or more enemy planes. The Israeli Air force boasts 39 pilots who shot down 5 or more planes, and 10 of these have shot down more than 8 planes.

 * One of these pilots, Col. (Res.) Giora Even (Epstein), stands out as the unquestioned Ace of Aces, having shot down a record 17 (seventeen!) planes in the course of his amazing career. Epstein has held his record for 25 years, and needless to say - is a true IAF icon, and an object of veneration for generations of IAF pilots. And the record is not confined to the IAF: according to the Guinness Book of World Records, the world record holder for jet air victories is an American pilot who shot down 16 planes. Apparently, someone had better tell the Guinness guys about Giora Epstein.

 * 687 enemy airplanes have been shot down in dogfights since Israel`s birth- May of 1948, while only 23 Israeli planes have been shot down by enemy planes since 1948.

 has some parts copied from here and consist of possible copy rights infrigment. Hence, the page is reverted to previous version. User: 62.0.93.195, your contribution is welcomed, but please try to summarize the data instead of copy it. See also: copyrights. MathKnight 11:38, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * IAF is holding world records for the air force with the highest number of enemy's warplanes shoot-downs, air combats, special operations, and air to ground operations, since the end of World-War II.

The text says Giora Epstein has the record for jets shot down, but in fact Captain Nikolai Sutyagin holds the record with 21 jets shot down on the Eastern Front during World War II.
 * You mean the Korean War.

Regards, Danny
 * In WW-II there were no JET planes. The pilots were flying PISTON planes. When it is said that someone is holding the world record of JETS shoot downs, it is referred to the era after WW-II...

And what about Me-262s? Some were reportedly shot down.

Sutyagin was a Korean War ace who has 21 CLAIMED wictories. I found a site that disputes this claim (as it does for many other aces on both sides) and claims that Yevgeni Pepelyayev was the Korean top scorer with 12 confirmed victories. Of course, Epstein`s record still needs confirmation from a non Israeli-source (though I am certain that a great aviator is in question)

Veljko Stevanovich

The most most successful jet fighter pilot was not the American ace, Capt. Joseph McConnel, but the German ace Oberstleutnant Heinz Bär. McConnel shot down 16 aircraft whilst flying jets during the Korean war, and Bär was also the victor of 16 combats whilst flying Messerschmitt Me262A jet fighters at the end of World War Two.

What makes Bär more successful is that the 16 aircraft he destroyed while flying jets were merely the last 16 in Bär's final tally of 220 aerial victories during the war. No other pilot of jet combat aircraft of any nationality approaches Bär's total record of success.

 * Pepelyaev has 19 confirmed kills making him the confirmed top scoring jet ace.

Israelis beat Germans
"Israeli air force pilots handily beat their German counterparts in "dogfights"..." Many doubt that this was so. Does this controversial and unverified statement belong in an encyclopedic article?

I agree, so I'm going to remove it, at least until a credible source is provided. I just hope it doesn't turn into a revert war. 69.218.239.36 04:14, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

I just added the only somewhat reliable reference I could find [www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1319798/posts here], and have reincluded the paragraph. There should definitely be some comparison between the IAF and other air forces, though this quote isn't perfect. Joshdboz 22:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't know ... the anonimity bit seems a little iffy. Do you have any better sources? 69.218.208.195 01:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

This whole article is starting to look kinda iffy. I'm looking at the article on the Yom Kippur War, a featured article, and it said that 102 Israeli Air Force aircraft were shot down (this article brags). So I'm removing the paragraph that says the Israeli Air force has only suffered 23 casualties since its birth. I think this article needs reviewed by an unbiased, yet knowledgable source. 69.211.140.39 20:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Just because an airforce lost 102 aircrafts during one war, does not mean that it had 102 (or more) casualties. Pilots can abandon their crafts, you know. Indeed, many Israeli airfighters were kept as prisoners of war in Syria and Egypt.

 * 23 does sound a little low. Rabend (talk) 20:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

1967 War - the downed planes I believe were shot while on the ground in a sneak attack - preemptive war, other articles in this wiki praise/excuse the preeemptive strike ( get the stories together please - is there an editor? ) ...reviewed by an unbiased,... not very likely ...knowledgable source.... yes this is ( wiki is not made up of fools or uneducated dopes but unbiased is unfortunately not its strong suit ) but take most of it with a grain of salt.

Um ... the Israelis pre-empted the Egyptians, so I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. Oh, and what stories are you talking about? I'm kind of knowledgable on this subject. 70.227.192.22 21:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Non-Neutral POV and Factual errors
The following clearly violates neutrality guidelines:

"IAF has started a campaign to bomb urban areas, highways, Hezbollah positions and international aiports. In these raids at least 400+ have been killed,1500+ have been injured and a majority of them have been hospitalized. Further 500,000+ have been displaced as of 24 July.

In this process a IAF F-16I was shot down over Beirut by Hezbollah ground fire, after she pounced some Hezbollah postions. The pilot is believed dead.-But Israeli and world media especially the American media due to pressure from American Israel Public Affairs Committee and other such organisations;are trying to best of their ability to misconfirm this as this will be big damage to IAF record.[3]"Conspiracy of silence".

On the other hand IDF tries to denies the loss of any aircraft by saying that it was the a long range missile of Hezbollah which fired after "a battery of them" was pounded by IDF jets. Now the Israeli are trying to give it a new colour by saying it crashed while taking off for a combat mission. Another incident involving an IAF F-16I was the crash of such a plane while it was taking off.''' The takeoff gear was damaged and the Pilots launched out another propaganda. ''' As an IDF Brigadier-General Alon Friedman told the Israeli paper Maariv: "It's possible that in the coming days our ground operations will increase."  For this reason the strategy of IDF have been changed to ground attack instead of losing more aircraft to ground fire as these are much costly then whole group of soldiers.[1]

Also after this US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (codi) has arrived to put some pressure on Lebanon to curb the Hezbollah[4],otherwise the US will have to intervene with it's own jets to bomb Beirut because Israelis don't want their soldiers to die while rescuing their fellows. She has also brought bomb with her[5].She has also arrive to give Israel enough time for it brutal action in Lebanon[6]

A helicopter has been shot down by Hezbollah which again Israeli army spokeswoman try to blame on technical

problems in middle of war.[7].Both pilot are dead[8].

This bring the total number of helicopter lost by IAF in this conflict to 3. Another two bumped into each other and were destroyed. '''What a beautiful explanation for loss. what a possibility why doesn't it happen in peace time?'''"

In addition, several of the citations say noting about that which they are included to support, or explicitly state the opposite:

is cited in support of the following: "In this process a IAF F-16I was shot down over Beirut by Hezbollah ground fire, after she pounced some Hezbollah postions. The pilot is believed dead.-But Israeli and world media especially the American media due to pressure from American Israel Public Affairs Committee and other such organisations;are trying to best of their ability to misconfirm this as this will be big damage to IAF record."

Not only does the article say nothing about attepmted media cover-ups benefitting anyone, but the citation also attempts to use an opinion article as backup for a factual statement.

is cited as support for the statement "For this reason the strategy of IDF have been changed to ground attack instead of losing more aircraft to ground fire as these are much costly then whole group of soldiers." The article makes no such assertation

is cited as support for the statement "...otherwise the US will have to intervene with it's own jets to bomb Beirut...", when in fact the article itself quotes Ms. Rice as saying "We are looking at what kind of international assistance force makes sense, but I do not think that it is anticipated that U.S. ground forces are expected for that force,"

is cited as support for the statement "She has also brought bomb with her" Ms. Rice is not even mentioned in this article.

Npov
the lines in bold were comment by somebody of arab Pov.The source 2 was about the Influence of [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] on media.this might be an opinion but it is fact that this committee has too much influence on media.what happens to anyone who says anything against '''zionist. jews''' are a different story? the source 3 show what have been changed "instead of bombardment troops are moved in" does this source needs to mention it in clear words that israeli air power is something of show and then get a office bombed which will be blame on al-qadea. source 4 does US need to martyr her own soldiers for the casue of protecting her captors.and why must US intervene with ground troops when it has so called precision missiles to fire on bireut and landing on tel aviv.what a wonderful guidance system these have.to confirm check record of BGM-109 Tomahawk. about source 5 the bomb deal was finalled on as quickly as she arrived in mid east.did you read the date and time. about source 5 does not this confirm the arab pov President Bush said Saturday that his administration's diplomatic efforts in the Mideast will focus on strategy for confronting Hezbollah and its supporters in Syria and Iran.

"Iran's regime has also repeatedly defied the international community with its ambition for nuclear weapons and aid to terrorist groups," Bush said. "Their actions threaten the entire Middle East and stand in the way of resolving the current crisis and bringing lasting peace to this troubled region."

---Thank you for proving my point!!

If this "American/Israel Public Affais Committe" does indeed have undue influence on the media's portrayal of Israel, wouldn't it be more appropriate to create a new entry in which to raise those points, and then link to that internally?

I didn't say the "bomb deal" was or wasn't finalized coincidentally with Ms. Rice's arrival in the Levant. All I said was that the article cited to support that statement in fact said absolutely nothing at all to that end. It still doesn't.

why do need a article which will be deleted after a hour only.the article cited have the same date as the visit of Rice.She is there to give support to Israeli operations is this not a true story or still it look fiction.And what is israeli operation a senior bully crushing on one class children after a one class student hit him with a pencil.About the recall of aircraft if you a little knowledge of Aircrafts every aircraft down is investigated and sorties are sometimes canceled after a crash is know.so does the iaf do if you have someting of in.you are doing the samething to that person as the [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] do any one speaking the lang. of Witness they blame him/her to be of wrong view and they themselves have many experts on thier hand, to pour in their knowledge in support of US and Israel.they try to blame every thing to something which should be a workmanship mistake or a technical problem not the work of their opponents.like the exp. is here somebody wrote the article,and he or she was blamed as having arab pov.what about all those who have a Israeli pov.does the statement of a witness is wrong and somebody who have just seen it on tv is true at all costs.And i could like to ask how do the a organistion such as Hezb got a shipment of long range missiles, was the cia sleeping or they just want to blame Iran for everthing that goes wrong with their intel. why does not there is something called arieal recon photo by israel of any long rang missile in hezb store room or on the move.

Cleaning the F-15 trivia
The trivia about an "emergency landing of an F-15 with one wing" is absolutely fasle. As a pilot of many hundreds of flight hours I can swear this is not possible because you need to have a balance of lifting forces in both sides of the aircraft's center of gravity. Flying with a part of wing missing is possible (but not usual), flying without a wing is not. You can find a set of pictures of the dammaged aircraft wich are bad fakes. In those you can see different weapons configurations on the same aircraft and a naked people on the runway below the plane (second picture) !!! That's why I think cleaning this trivia is a good thing for wikipedia. you can join me as " seb' " on the french wikipedia.

–This is true. You can contact Boeing if you want and ask them. DeepSpace 09:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

-2nd. From the Wikipedia article on the F-15, with link: "On May 1 1983 during an Israeli Air Force training dogfight, an F-15D collided with an A-4 Skyhawk. The right wing of the Eagle was, unknowingly to pilot Zivi Nadavi, torn off roughly two feet (0.6 m) from the body. The pilot disobeyed his instructor's command to eject and managed to land the crippled aircraft successfully. The aircraft was able to land because of the large horizontal surface area of the tail and the amount of lift generated by the engine intake and body ."

World War Two German Aircraft

I believe this part of the early history text is incorrect. The Avias were Czech built BF109 airframes with Jumo engines, and were never used by the Germans in this configuration. I cant think of a single German WW2 aircraft that was used by the IAF. The Avias came from the Czech's, the P51's came from Sweden and the Spitfires came from Czeck's.

If you would read Fighter Wing, by Tom Clancy, this incident was also cited as a testament to the rugged reliability of the F-15. Of course, it requires a good enough pilot to compensate for the lift force, but I'm sure the Israelis have lots of those

Some asshole has wrote something about the Hizballah and Muslams and used this page to express his ideas about the IAF.

To the original writer oof this article - please rebuilt this article.

thanks.

--

So borring to always repeat the same things to clean this so old trivia...

M.D via Boeing let us know many times this is absolutely incorrect. This trivia was created by Patrick Havens who lives in Napa, California.

On this website [] you can find a set of 8 pictures of showing this landing "with one wing". On the 2nd picture, you can see on right, below, a naked people (or puppy??)

On pictures 3-4-5-7, you can see different weapon configurations on the left wing : Aim-9 sidewinder and no fuel tank on picture 4, no sidewinder but fuel thank on all the others !!!! on picture 3 if you're good, you can see the photograph cut, but not the 2 ft left of the wing.

On this website [] you can see a picture of 1993 of the f-15 in question, whithout the 5 killmarks pretended by your website. Watch carrefully... this f-15 is owned by USAF, not IAF !!! first fly ever of a f-15D is February 26, 1979, so it couldn't have 5 airkills duirng this time. Besides, the pictures shows the F-15 flaps are open during the landing, despite the pilot needed to reduce the lift of this wing. Furthermore you cannot see any correction applied by the rudder, the elevators or roll flaps....

I hope I help you to open your eyes... if not, just buy a flight manual or have a talk with a good flight instructor... you don't have to be ashamed to believed this story, even some beginner pilots believed it to.

lastly, despite this false trivia, it is right that IAF is one of the very best of Air Forces in the world, because of its jet and its pilots. if you have any questions --- my profile is " seb' " on the french wikipedia.

 * This isn't the place to be discussing the F-15 trivia. Take it to the F-15 Talk page.--chris.lawson 23:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The F15 picture issue may have been clouded by the fact that the History Channel made a documentary about the F15 and included the wing incident. In their film includes some footage of an F15 with its wing missing, but this has clearly been CGIed for dramatic effect and is showned to be landing without a complete wing. The still photographs are of the actual aircraft involved and show that most of the wing is missing and not all of it. The History Channel reconstruction has been mixed with the genuine pics which may have led to the confusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.224.216 (talk) 23:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Merging History and Records and Highlights
Looking at other air force articles such as USAF or RAF or Royal Canadian Air Force, perhaps we should just maintain one history section on this article? Thoughts? Sasquatch t|c 20:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

name of article
Shouldn't it be Israel Air Force (without the genititve-i? (like Israel Defense Forces) --Pax:Vobiscum 09:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps not - the official website for the IAF calls itself the "Israeli Air Force". Ottershrew 22:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

CH-53 Caption
I've removed part of the recently added text to the caption accompanying the CH-53 photo. I see that text as subtle POV pushing - over-emphasizing the fact that one such aircraft was shot down in the recent war over Lebanon, while none of the other aircraft photos in the article have anything similar. The editor who insists on adding that text claims he's doing so becuase the aircraft are not well-known. In that case, I wonder if he;d be Ok with a caption that says "CH-53 landing, similar to the ones used to ambush Iraqi convoys in the Yom Kippur War" ?

I will not be ok with such a caption because aircraft crash is major incident and there is no need of mention which aircraft ambushed which convoy.User talk:Yousaf465
 * You claime dthat you added the caption becuase people are not familiar with the aircraft. I'm glad to see you've backed of that nonsensical charge. An aircraft being downed in a war is a hardly a major incident - it is a trivial, common and expected event. You are merely POV pushing. Isarig 05:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Userbox
I've prepared some userboxes for different Air Forces freaks - if you would like to use it, feel free to copy & paste following code in your Babel Tower or another place:

All are essentially the same, but represent different camouflage schemes. --Piotr Mikołajski 07:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the userboxes. There's just one thing - the Israeli Air Force is generally abbreviated to IAF, not IDFAF, and that is also the official name. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 18:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

OH-58D
Current aircraft table lists the OH-58D as being in service with the IAF, however, the IAF official website does not list the OH-58D or any Bell 406 variant as being in service; only the Bell 206. --Born2flie 20:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Conflicting Information
The two different sections on the Six Day War (history and highlights) on this page show different amounts of Israeli planes shot down (10 and 19 respectively). I don't know which, if either, are correct - perhaps someone with more knowledge and/or time could research and edit as appropriate. Chirpy 18:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tnbs-021.jpg
Image:Tnbs-021.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:33, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Giora Epstein's Rank
His rank is stated as "Aluf" in this article. "Aluf" is the designation for a General or an Admiral, Giora Epstien retired at 55 as an "Aluf Misne," a Colonel, he was never an General or Admiral.Joeycfc 16:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

UAV Shootdowns?
"Israeli aircraft also shot down three Hezbollah aerial drones during the conflict."

Whoa. Where is the citation for this? I didn't know Hezbollah forces were even using drones, much less having them be shot out of the air by the IAF!

75.30.121.117 02:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Enjoy: Iranian-made Ababil-T Hezbollah UAV shot down by Israeli fighter in Lebanon crisis. And here is the video: IAF shoots down Hizbolla UAV IAF footage
 * DeepSpace 00:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

"Highlights."

Is this an appropriate term for a very serious and grave action/response? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.211.172.7 (talk) 00:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

up to date numbers
http://www.inss.org.il/upload/(FILE)1206270841.pdf Flayer (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

First shootdowns of F-16/F-15
Is it confirmed or probable, because there are two lines that say the same thing in the other section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.202.146.202 (talk) 20:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Israel dont use the Socata TB-21 Trinidad any more
she start to replace it with Beechcraft Bonanza A36 since December 2004

Merging pics into article
I'd like to merge this photographs into the pertinent areas, preferably in the "current aircrafts" section but I've had some trouble doing that.

Suggestions? Wikifan12345 (talk) 12:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

IAI Arava
the israeli ai force phased out the Arava in the middle of 2004 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/israel/iaf-equipment.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.48.31 (talk) 22:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

"Records and Highlights" section removed
The records and highlights section really had no place in a serious article and is therefore GONE. It was nothing but a relic of an ancient IDF site anyway. All relevant data has been merged into the historical section, except for some anecdotal info which has been removed. I've also moved several paragraphs around, trying to introduce some logical order. The nuclear weapons section, for instance, has been moved into the structure section, as it begins with the units supposedly operating the stuff. I've tried to delete as little as possible, keeping as many as the previous contributions as possible. Poliocretes (talk) 15:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Size of the Israeli air force
The INSS reference suggst different numbers than those were included in the infobox. Flayer wrote that the former numbers are based on comparisons of several different sources. Doing it this way isn't highly recommended and comprise original research. We do know that the INSS is a respectful official organization and that their report was published in 2009, meaning that it's very up to date. What more that it have no signfican mistakes. The fact that there are no F-4E combat fighters in the article table, for instance, is a mistake that previous editors could avoid if they would give more credit to the INSS.--Gilisa (talk) 11:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

 * Unfortunately INSS lost most of its creditability. F-4 fighters were decommissioned, as well as a portion of F-15A/B's and F-16A/B's, there were various official publications about this fact. Some other aircraft they keep in the list were also officially decommissioned. Take a look on Combat vessels section - Aliya class appears in the list, though INS Aliya and INS Geula were sold and launched in Mexico as ARM Huracán and ARM Tormenta more than 5 years ago! Flayer (talk) 12:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * By the way, I was the person who brought here this INSS reference (and the previous one as well) before I actually read it carefully. Flayer (talk) 12:29, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

 * I found the INSS source before I know it's here already. INS vessels are not part of the discussion on IAF inventory and there is no one single public source on military affairs that is 100% accurate.--Gilisa (talk) 12:33, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

 * Solution per talk and talk. Range of different sources estimations (min and max; recommend on recent ones) in the size entry instead of decisive numbers.--Gilisa (talk) 12:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

the INSS report does not include the F-4's as active aircrafts.. they add that the F-4'S are in "operational storage". their repoert is a reliable source.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.177.75.92 (talk) 20:40, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Bunker Buster Bombs
Any word as to what type of bomb? And is this tied in with the F-35s?

The best American bunker busters are dropped by B-2s, but we ain't selling those to nobody.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/09/21/bloomberg1376-L935B16S972801-3G4V2G2OHHKG4UIE5V75BJQF5G.DTL Among other advanced weaponry sought by Israel, Barak intends to ask the U.S. for "bunker buster" bombs that can penetrate hardened underground targets, the YNet news site reported yesterday, without saying where it got the information.

Hcobb (talk) 04:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

 * GBU-28. Flayer (talk) 09:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Sky Crows
So far I have found only that one article that mention the Sky Crows and I have no squadron number, but their noted aircraft does not match any of the other squadrons at the named air base. So what gives? Hcobb (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It is apparently a unit, not a squadron. Unit 555 according to IAF official site in Hebrew. Flayer (talk) 09:27, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Confusing data table
Why do we need 3 unique in-service tables? So we have three sources that provide similar data, so why do we need to create different tables to demonstrate the irrelevant differences? It is totally confusing. Wikifan12345 (talk) 02:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Take a closer look, the data isn't similar and the differences aren't irrelevant. Three independent sources provide data, which is erroneous in some cases, but allows greater image. Non of the stand-alone sources is completely free of stupid mistakes, while the IAF itself would never provide any OrBat table due to OpSec. Flayer (talk) 19:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

 * The data table is very confusing because it shows four different tables for each aircraft. I thought 20+27+38 (85) F16A Baz, but really it is only one of those numbers. Look at this table: "Notice the simplicity. Wikifan12345 (talk) 05:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

 * We can't achieve this simplicity until we have one source that is clearly more reliable then other sources, or multiple sources that say one thing. Now we have 4-5 *reliable* sources that say different things. Flayer (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

 * Can we rearrange the data to show a more readable chart? Wikifan12345 (talk) 07:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

 * Maybe, but I'm curious how can we do it without losing data. Flayer (talk) 08:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Israel's aerial superiority is in danger
Does Ido Nehushtan count as a reliable source for this claim? And when the fnord are we going to turn on archiving for this page? Hcobb (talk) 22:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The context of this claim, is that Israel shouldn't cut IAF budget. Flayer (talk) 23:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Isn't he always going to say that? My query is if his claim actually holds up to scrutiny. Will a handful of poorly maintained aircraft in the hands of terrorists actually overwhelm the IAF? Hcobb (talk) 00:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Missing branches in the command
The articale is missing information about the IAF have an education branch in charge of educational facilities (The air and space technical colleges, all the training facilities as an example (ביסל"ט 21)) - each shoher is serving in this kind of facilities (I've edited  one but more help is needed - example in the Hebrew wikipedia iaf articale on the subject

The articale is missing information about the maintenance branches example Air-force Maintenance unit 22 Hebrew (Eng. / R&D /maintance/salvaging), the Lhav units (Logistics Eng Control)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.226.24.240 (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Bell AH-1 Cobra Retired
The Israeli AH-1 Cobra's are phased out in favor of Drones according to http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/28/arms-israel-airforce-idUSL5N0KQ2ER20140528 — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrandMaster101 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Future
A table designed for "potential things" appears to go against Notability, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:CBALL. So at best a small sentence, can exist for the reader as per WP:AIRCRAFT-OPERATORS - FOX 52 (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. If a definite purchase order has been made it is one thing. But if it is just in evaluation (as the future heli buy is, still considering types and might not go through budgeting....) it shouldn't be in a table.Icewhiz (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Israeli Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170315175212/http://news.walla.co.il/item/384730 to http://news.walla.co.il/item/384730
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151124130349/http://www.inss.org.il/uploadImages/systemFiles/Israel322533025.pdf to http://www.inss.org.il/uploadImages/systemFiles/Israel322533025.pdf
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/69nKxS9nj?url=http://www.scramble.nl/il.htm to http://www.scramble.nl/il.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Vocabulary: should be "Historical" not "Historic"
There is a section called "Historic" This is incorrect. That word means important in history. The correct word is "historical" which means relating to the past. I can't edit this myself due to the article being locked. Man with two legs (talk) 11:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed.Icewhiz (talk) 14:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Article title
The reason that the article has remained at Israeli Air Force since the 2004 Hebrew name change is that it has remained the common name. Even now, the official website continues to use the older, shorter title. As such, an RM is unlikely to be successful. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 21:24, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You're probably right. There are plenty of cases when we use the more precise name within the articles themselves (as was done sporadically on this page before with the air and space arm), while leaving the WP:COMMONNAME as the main title. Garuda28 (talk) 21:27, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

 * No problem. BilCat (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Now, to establish consensus: does anyone here have issues with mentioning that the Israeli Air Force was renamed to the Israeli Air and Space Force back in 2004? Here is the best English language source I could find: (https://spacenews.com/israel-puts-air-force-charge-space-activities-hotly-debated-decision-renames-service-israel/); the secondary question is how to deal with it within articles. I would think that it makes sense to replace mentions of it after 2004 with the new name, while maintaining the current title until a time when the WP:COMMONNAM gets supplanted. and, since you have both already weighed in on this, what are your thoughts? Garuda28 (talk) 21:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I disagree. When you mention "Israeli Air and Space Force" in other articles, it is less recognizable to the reader than the commonly used name "Israeli Air Force" which is used by almost every RS. What makes it worse is that in some articles, talking about the uniforms worn by the "air and space force" makes it sound like there is also a space force in addition to the air force, introducing unnecessary confusion. (t · c)  buidhe  21:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't at least be a mention of it on this page and a sentence on renaming though? We have Manual of Style/Lead section that should be able to accommodate it in the introduction (air and space arm also seems sporadically used across the IDF pages). As for the problem of how it is used in text, that should be able to be easily fixed with proper capitalization and punctuation, if we do chose to go that route (no different that French Air and Space Force in that case).Garuda28 (talk) 22:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't oppose adding a sentence on renaming to the body, but the official name is already is in the first sentence of the article: "The Israeli Air Force (IAF; זְרוֹעַ הָאֲוִיר וְהֶחָלָל, Zroa HaAvir VeHahalal, "Air and Space Arm"..." (t · c)  buidhe  22:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * How does this sound for a reworded intro "The Israeli Air Force (IAF; חֵיל הָאֲוִיר), officially known as the Israeli Air and Space Force (IASF; זְרוֹעַ הָאֲוִיר וְהֶחָלָל) since 2004, is the air and space arm of the Israeli Defense Forces? What I'm trying to do with this is pull out the Air and Space Force to make it clear that it is the official name and state clearly when it became the official name. Garuda28 (talk) 22:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No, 1) I don't believe that's the most accurate translation of the Hebrew words and 2) the "Israeli Air and Space Force" name is extremely marginal in English-language sources, so it should not be given undue weight. (t · c)  buidhe  22:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * How does using air and space arm (as put out here https://www.iaf.org.il/9289-52470-en/IAF.aspx) sound? I believe this is the official air (and space?) force site?Garuda28 (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I think that the current version is fine and the change would not be an improvement, as it would overemphasize a term that is only used in a tiny minority of independent sources, for instance see Google Scholar results. (t · c)  buidhe  23:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I would argue that, even if used in a minority of sources, it would make sense to highlight the official name, especially since it highlights the space operations aspect of the service for readers (more broadly, that seems to have been the reason for the name change). Let me put a post at WPMILHIST and see if we can get some more users feedback on this. Garuda28 (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Air 'and Space since 2004' needs to be mentioned somewhere in the lead. Seems that we should leave 'Arm' and just add a referenced note that the title changed in 2004. Buckshot06 (talk) 11:19, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 July 2021
Error in the "Current inventory" section. Israel has 75* F-35I "Adir" on order not just 50. The last 25 of the 75 planned was ordered alongside the new KC-46A.

Please correct.

Source: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israeli-air-force-to-buy-refueling-aircraft-25-more-f-35-fighter-jets-1.9544478 46.140.129.254 (talk) 07:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting wait.svg Already done The Current Inventory section states that Israel has "50 ordered and 75 planned in total" in regards to the F-35I. –– F ORMAL D UDE ( talk ) 03:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Add Boeing KC46 Pegasus Tanker aircraft
4 pieces have been ordered and 4 additional are planned of Boeing KC-46 Pegasus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1810:3E21:A500:218D:85A8:C214:FC09 (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

 * ✅ - FOX 52 talk! 16:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The Wikipedia page for the KC-46 states that the IAF is receiving KC-46 aircraft (https://www.timesofisrael.com/ministers-sign-off-on-pricey-purchase-of-f-35s-refuelers-and-bombs/). The KC-767 page that this IAF page currently links to makes no mention of any Israeli use of the KC-767 vice the KC-46. 2600:8805:1925:5400:44F9:9528:C5F0:19C4 (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

The aircraft the IAF ordered are KC-46s, not KC-767s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:1925:5400:B8B6:37FA:3AE:9B8D (talk) 15:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Attack on UN observers in 2006
On July 25, 2006 an Israeli warplane bombed a United Nations observation post in southern Lebanon, killing all of the UN observers. The four unarmed UNTSO personnel killed were from Finland, China, Austria and Canada. The observation post was clearly marked with the UN flag and its location was known to the Israelis; the attack appears to have been intentional, although the Israelis later claimed that it was due to faulty information. Fos some reason, this event is not mentioned in the section on the war in Lebanon in 2006. See International incidents during the 2006 Lebanon War Death Bredon (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

The number Of F15 is wrong
According to this link that you have published the total amount F15 in Israeli Air Force is 84

https://www.flightglobal.com/download?ac=83735

41 F15A/C 18 F15B/D 25 F15E Total of 84 F15 in its different types.

Not 84 F15A/C

Also an additional 25F15IX are being Ordered in a primary process

https://breakingdefense.com/2023/01/israel-formally-requests-25-f-15-ex-from-the-us-sources/?amp=1 2A06:C701:4931:8D00:C90E:313D:1FC2:FA57 (talk) 07:43, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 January 2024
under "Combat aircraft" change the F-15 Variant from "F-15 A/C" to F-15A/B/C/D change the F-16 Variant from "F-16C/I" to F-16C/D/I

and remove both F-15 and F-16 from the "Trainer aircraft" as they are used for Combat more then as a trainer. WarDog669 (talk) 12:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Israeli Air Force


text:
Do not call list

A do not call list or do not call registry is a list of personal phone numbers that are off-limits to telemarketers in some countries. Do not call lists may also be held privately by a company, listing numbers that they will not call.

National registries

 * Do Not Call Register (Australia)
 * National Do Not Call List (Canada)
 * National Customer Preference Register (India)
 * New Zealand Name Removal Service
 * Telephone Preference Service (United Kingdom)
 * National Do Not Call Registry (United States)
 * Do Not Call Registry (Singapore)
 * Bloctel (France)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Do not call list


text:
User talk:Jguk/Sandbox1

I don't know whether you're soliciting comments from Wikipedians at large about this, but, FWIW, here are my thoughts. First, my bias: I'm an attorney myself. The only disciplinary proceeding ever brought against me was utterly foolish and was dismissed at an early stage. Nevertheless, it caused me a certain amount of hassle. I had to answer it, because the Disciplinary Committee can cause a lawyer a lot of grief.

I'm not sure whether I agree with the comments that some people made on Fred's talk page, that non-Wikipedia stuff should never be relevant here. In some cases, it might be worth taking into account. In this instance, though, I don't see that kind of substance. It's not as if Fred were accused of taking bribes to throw a case or some such. The underlying charge was solicitation of prostitution. It seems that he was too cavalier about the disposition of that case and about the further proceeding arising from it. He should have just paid the assessed fine in 1997. Having failed to do so, he should have responded to the new proceeding with apologies for the oversight and a check for the 1997 fine plus interest. If he didn't have the money, he should've responded with an apology for the oversight and a request to work out a payment plan. He seems to have just ignored it -- perhaps procrastinating about dealing with an unpleasant subject, perhaps giving priority to clients' affairs while neglecting his own, perhaps having lost the notice under a pile of other papers. Anyway, regardless of what the cause was, he did nothing, so the Colorado disciplinary authorities were left with no other way to get his attention than to suspend him. A regrettable incident all around, to be sure, but I just don't see it as so earthshaking as to justify this major step. JamesMLane 11:40, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jguk/Sandbox1


text:
Boina

Boina may refer to:

 * It is the Spanish, Portuguese, Galician and Catalan word for beret.
 * Dabbahu Volcano, also known as Boina, is a volcano in Ethiopia
 * Boina, a former kingdom in Madagascar
 * Boina, a village in Dalboșeț Commune, Caraș-Severin County, Romania
 * Taxonomic synonym for Boinae, a subfamily of boid snakes.

title: Boina


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capitolium University

Capitolium University
Vanity or spam or both posted by a 23-year old user (User:Leomanfredotti) who claims to be rector or director of the "university". "Capitolium University" gives only 15 Google hits. The text is nearly incomprehensible and possibly machine-translated. A cleanup tag was added by an anonymous user, but removed by the original author (who also vandalized Cleanup). It was later readded by me, but again removed.

The article exists on the Spanish Wikipedia (es:Capitolium University), posted on 18 december, but was previously deleted on 11 december by sysop Lourdes Cardenal with the motivation "Pura publicidad; no es enciclopédico". / up+land 11:45, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Hey, this must be who attempted to list this school among the "major" universities at Distance education recently, which I reverted. It was a redlink at that time. Dodgy universities may be notable per se, but this is a minor one. No vote yet. Samaritan 12:52, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be a practically non-existant e-university.   — Asbestos | Talk 16:00, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn website. {User:LeeHunter Niteowlneils 18:22, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)}
 * Delete. Doesn't seem notable, and even if it was, this article is too incomprehensible to add anything to 'human knowledge'. Niteowlneils 18:22, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn at best. Wyss 18:29, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Capitolium University discussion forums have only four messages, in three threads.  Seems like a brand-new website to me. --Carnildo 23:00, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, self promotion --Wikimol 23:32, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity. Shane King 00:14, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete  --fvw *  08:20, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
 * Delete: DCEdwards1966 21:30, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)


text:
Hilaire Belloc bibliography

This is a chronological bibliography of books (with a few pamphlets) and a general bibliography of articles by the author Hilaire Belloc. His books of verse went through many different editions, and are not comprehensively covered.

To 1909

 * Verses and Sonnets, poems (London: Ward and Downey, 1896).
 * The Bad Child's Book of Beasts (The Camelot Press Limited, 1896) poems, Basil Temple Blackwood (B.T.B.) illustrator
 * More Beasts for Worse Children (1897) poems, B. T. B. illustrator
 * The Modern Traveller (1898) poems, B. T. B. illustrator
 * Danton: A Study (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1899)
 * Paris, Its Sites, Monuments and History with Maria Hornor Lansdale (Philadelphia: John C. Winston Company, 1898)
 * A Moral Alphabet (1899) poems, B. T. B. illustrator
 * Paris (1900)
 * Lambkin's Remains (1900)
 * Robespierre (London: Nisbet, 1901)
 * The Path to Rome (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1902) non-fiction (a travel book with numerous digressions and personal vignettes)
 * The Great Inquiry; faithfully reported by Hilaire Belloc and ornamented with sharp cuts drawn on the spot by G. K. Chesterton (London: Duckworth, 1903)
 * Caliban's Guide to Letters, or: The Aftermath; or, Gleanings from a busy life. Called upon the outer cover, for purposes of sale, Caliban's Guide to Letters, etc. (Humorous sketches.) (London: Duckworth, 1903)
 * The Romance of Tristan and Iseult (London: George Allen, 1913) translation of Joseph Bédier's 1900 work
 * Emmanuel Burden, Merchant (London: Methuen, 1904) novel
 * Avril: Essays on the French Renaissance (London: Duckworth, 1904) criticism
 * The Old Road: from Canterbury to Winchester (London: A. Constable, 1905)
 * Hills and the Sea (London: Methuen, 1906)
 * Sussex (London: A. & C. Black, 1906) illustrations by Wilfrid Ball
 * Esto Perpetua: Algerian Studies and Impressions (London: Duckworth, 1906) travel
 * Cautionary Tales for Children (London: Eveleigh Nash, 1907) poems, B. T. B. illustrator
 * The Historic Thames (London: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1907)
 * Mr. Clutterbuck's Election (1908) novel
 * On Nothing and Kindred Subjects (London: Methuen, 1908) essays
 * On Everything (1909) essays
 * The Eye-Witness (London: Eveleigh Nash, 1908)
 * A Change in the Cabinet (London: Methuen, 1909) novel
 * Marie Antoinette (London: Methuen, 1909) non-fiction
 * The Pyrenees (1909)

1910 – 1919

 * Pongo and the Bull (London: Constable, 1910) novel
 * Catholicism and Socialism: Second Series (London: Catholic Truth Society, 1910) essays, with Joseph Rickaby and others
 * On Anything (1910) essays
 * On Something (London: Methuen, 1910; New York : E.P. Dutton, 1911) essays
 * Verses (1910)
 * The Party System (London: Stephen Swift, 1911) non-fiction (with Cecil Chesterton)
 * More Peers (London: Stephen Swift, 1911) poems, B. T. B. illustrator
 * The Four Men: A Farrago (London: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1911) novel
 * The French Revolution (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911; London: Williams & Norgate, 1914) non-fiction
 * The Girondin (London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1911) novel
 * First and Last (London: Methuen, 1911) essays
 * British Battles (London, Stephen Swift & Co.; Hugh Rees, 1911–1913): Blenheim (1911) Turcoing (1912), Crécy (1912), Waterloo (1912), Malplaquet, Poitiers (1913); as Six British Battles (London: Arrowsmith, 1931; 1951)
 * The Servile State (London and Edinburgh: T.N. Foulis, 1912) politics/economics
 * The Green Overcoat (Bristol: J. W. Arrowsmith: 1912) novel
 * The River of London (London: T.N. Foulis, 1912) with "illustrations reproduced from oil paintings by John Muirhead"
 * This and That and the Other (1912) essays
 * The History of England, from the First Invasion by the Romans to the Accession of William and Mary in 1688 (New York: The Catholic Publication Society, 1912) with John Lingard, 11 volumes, and later versions in the 1920s
 * Warfare in England (London: Williams & Norgate, 1912)
 * The Stane Street: a monograph (London:Constable, 1913) illustrated by William Hyde
 * The Book of the Bayeux Tapestry (London: Chatto & Windus, 1914)
 * Land & Water [...] The World's War : Special Articles by Hilaire Belloc, A. H. Pollen &c. &c. (London: The County Gentleman Publishing Co., 1914- ) magazine (multiple volumes), also in hard covers
 * The Two Maps of Europe, and Other Aspects of the Great War (London: C. Arthur Pearson, 1915) non-fiction
 * A General Sketch of the European War, the First Phase (London: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1915)
 * A Picked Company, being a selection from the writings of H. Belloc (London: Methuen, 1915), ed. E. V. Lucas
 * At the Sign of the Lion (1916) essays (US)
 * The Last Days of the French Monarchy (London: Chapman & Hall, 1916)
 * A General Sketch of the European War, the Second Phase (Paris: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1916, Nelson's Continental Library)
 * The Free Press (1918)

1920 – 1929

 * Europe and the Faith (London: Constable, 1920) non-fiction
 * The House of Commons and Monarchy (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1920)
 * The Jews (London: Constable, 1922) later editions 1928, 1937
 * The Mercy of Allah (London: Chatto & Windus, 1922)
 * The Road (Hobson Press, 1923)
 * The Contrast (London: J. W. Arrowsmith, 1923) i.e. the contrast between Europeans and Americans
 * On (1923) essays
 * Economics for Helen (London: J. W. Arrowsmith, 1924) distributism
 * The Cruise of the Nona (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1925)
 * This and That and the Other (1925) essays
 * Mr. Petre (1925) novel, with 22 drawings by G. K. Chesterton
 * The French Revolution (1925)
 * Miniatures of French History (London: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1925)
 * Napoleon's Campaign of 1812 and the Retreat from Moscow (New York and London: Harper & Bros., 1926)
 * A Companion to Mr. Wells's "Outline of History"  (London: Sheed and Ward, 1926)
 * Mr. Belloc Still Objects (London: Sheed & Ward, 1926)
 * The Catholic Church and History (New York: Macmillan, 1926)
 * Short Talks with the Dead and Others (London: The Cayme Press, 1926; Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1926)
 * The Emerald of Catherine the Great (London: Arrowsmith, 1926; New York: Harper, 1926) with 21 drawings by G. K. Chesterton
 * Essays of Today and Yesterday (1926)
 * Mrs. Markham's New History of England being an Introduction for Young People to the Current History and Institutions of Our Time (Kensington, London: The Cayme Press, 1926) illustrations by Hester Sainsbury
 * The Highway and its Vehicles (London: Studio Ltd., 1926) edited by Geoffrey Holme
 * Augustan Books of Modern Poetry: Hilaire Belloc (London: Ernest Benn, n.d. but c. 1926)
 * Oliver Cromwell (London: Duckworth, 1927) non-fiction
 * The Haunted House (London: Arrowsmith, 1927) novel, with drawings by G. K. Chesterton
 * Towns of Destiny (New York: Robert M. McBride & Co., 1927)
 * Do We Agree?: A Debate Between G. K. Chesterton and Bernard Shaw, with Hilaire Belloc in the Chair (London: Cecil Palmer, 1928)
 * Many Cities (London: Constable, 1928) travel
 * M. Wells et Dieu. Des poèmes et des essais  (Paris: Plon, 1928, Collection Roseau d'or) with Maurice Beerblock, A. Beucler, Pierre Colle, Elie Gothchaux, Robert Honnert, Georges Hugnet, Mercédès de Gournay, Max Jacob, Jean de Menasce, Eugenio d'Ors, Paul Sabon
 * James II (1928) non-fiction
 * But Soft - We Are Observed! (London, Arrowsmith, 1928) novel (Shadowed! US)
 * How the Reformation Happened (London: Jonathan Cape, 1928)
 * Belinda: A Tale of Affection in Youth and Age (Life and Letters, 1928) novel
 * A Conversation with an Angel: and Other Essays (London: Jonathan Cape, 1928)
 * The Chanty of the Nona (London: Faber and Gwyer, 1928) Ariel Poems, #9
 * The Missing Masterpiece (London: Arrowsmith, 1929) novel with 41 drawings by G. K. Chesterton
 * Richelieu: A Study (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1929) non-fiction
 * Survivals and New Arrivals: The Old and New Enemies of the Catholic Church (London: Sheed & Ward, 1929) non-fiction
 * The Catholic Church and History (London: Burns, Oates & Washbourne, and New York: Macmillan, 1926; The Calvert Series, series editor: Hilaire Belloc)
 * Joan of Arc (London: Cassell, 1929)

1930 – 1939

 * The Man Who Made Gold (London: Arrowsmith, 1930) novel
 * Wolsey (London: Cassell, 1930) non-fiction
 * New Cautionary Tales (London: Duckworth, 1930) poems, pictures by Nicolas Bentley
 * Essays of a Catholic Layman in England (London: Sheed & Ward, 1931)
 * A Conversation with a Cat: and others (London: Cassell, 1931)
 * Cranmer (London: Cassell, 1931) non-fiction
 * On Translation: the Taylorian Lecture, 1931 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931)
 * One Hundred and One Ballades (London: Cobden-Sanderson, 1931) with E. C. Bentley, G. K. Chesterton, C.K. Scott-Moncrieff, Winifred Agar, Sidney Allnutt, Maurice Baring, Cecil Chesterton, Geoffrey Howard, Diggory King, and H. S. Mackintosh
 * Nine Nines or Novenas from a Chinese Litany of Odd Numbers (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1931), illustrations by Thomas Derrick
 * Napoleon (1932) non-fiction
 * The Postmaster General (London: Arrowsmith, 1932; Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1932) novel, drawings by G. K. Chesterton
 * Saulieu of the Morvan (New York: Ludowici-Celadon, 1932, The Tuileries Brochures series)
 * The Question and the Answer (New York: Bruce Publishing Co., 1932, Science and Culture Series)
 * Ladies and Gentlemen: For Adults Only and Mature at That (London: Duckworth, 1932) verses, pictures by Nicolas Bentley
 * An Heroic Poem in Praise of Wine (London: Peter Davies, 1932)
 * Charles the First, King of England (London: Cassell, 1933)
 * William the Conqueror (London: Peter Davies, 1933)
 * Below Bridges (London: Constable, 1933)
 * The Tactics and Strategy of the Great Duke of Marlborough (London: Arrowsmith, 1933)
 * How We Got The Bible (London: Catholic Truth Society, 1934) pamphlet
 * A Shorter History of England (New York: Macmillan, 1934)
 * Milton (1935) non-fiction
 * Hilaire Belloc (London: Methuen, 1935, Methuen's Library of Humour, edited by E. V. Knox)
 * Characters of the Reformation (London: Sheed & Ward, 1936) non-fiction, portraits by Jean Charlot
 * The Restoration of Property (London: The Distributist League, 1936) non-fiction
 * The Hedge and the Horse (London: Cassell, 1936) with illustrations by G. K. Chesterton
 * The Battleground: Syria and Palestine, The Seedplot of Religion (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1936)
 * The County of Sussex (London: Cassell, 1936)
 * The Crisis Of Our Civilisation (London: Cassell, 1937) non-fiction
 * The Crusades: The World's Debate (Milwaukee: Bruce Publishing Co., 1937)
 * An Essay on the Nature of Contemporary England (London: Constable, 1937; New York: Sheed & Ward, 1937) (cover title of U.S. edition:What England Really Is)
 * Stories, Essays, Poems (1938) edited by Ernest Rhys
 * Monarchy: A Study of Louis XIV (London: Cassell, 1938)
 * Return to the Baltic (London: Constable, 1938)
 * The Great Heresies (London: Sheed & Ward, 1938)
 * The Church and Socialism (London: Catholic Truth Society, 1934) reprint of undated first edition of 1909
 * The Case of Dr. Coulton (London: Sheed & Ward, 1938)
 * On Sailing the Sea: A Collection of Seagoing Writings (1939) selected by W. N. Roughead

1940 – 1953

 * The Last Rally: A Story of Charles II (London: Cassell, 1940) non-fiction
 * On the Place of Gilbert Chesterton in English Letters (1940); Spanish translation: Un gran escritor ingles G.K. Chesterton (Buenos Aires: La espiga de oro, 1942)
 * The Catholic and the War (London: Burns, Oates, 1940)
 * The Silence Of The Sea and Other Essays (London: Cassell, 1941)
 * Elizabethan Commentary: Creature of Circumstance (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1942)
 * Places (New York: Sheed & Ward, 1942)
 * Sonnets and Verse (New York: Sheed & Ward, 1944)
 * The Romance of Tristan and Iseult by Joseph Bedier (New York: Doubleday, 1945) translated by Belloc and Paul Rosenfeld
 * Selected Essays of Hilaire Belloc (London: Methuen, 1948) edited by J. B. Morton
 * The Alternative: An Article Originally Written During Mr. Belloc's Parliamentary Days, For "St. George's Review" and Since Revised (London: Distributist Books, c. 1950) distributist pamphlet, original version published under title: An Examination of Socialism
 * Hilaire Belloc: An Anthology of his Prose and Verse (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1951) selected by W. N. Roughead
 * World Conflict (London: Catholic Truth Society, 1951) booklet
 * Songs of the South Country (London: G. Duckworth, 1951) selected poems

Posthumous

 * Belloc Essays (London: Methuen, 1955) edited by Anthony Forster
 * The Verse of Hilaire Belloc (London: Nonesuch Press, 1954) edited W. N. Roughead
 * One Thing and Another. A Miscellany from his Uncollected Essays selected by Patrick Cahill (London: Hollis & Carter, 1955)
 * Collected Verse (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1958, Penguin Poets series, 44) with an introduction, etc. by Ronald Knox
 * Letters From Hilaire Belloc (London: Hollis & Carter, 1958) selected by Robert Speaight
 * Advice (London: Harvill Press, 1960) Hilaire Belloc's advice on wine, food and other matters
 * Complete Verse, including Sonnets and Verse, Cautionary Verses, the Modern Traveller (London: Duckworth, 1970)
 * Belloc: A Biographical Anthology (London: Allen & Unwin, 1970) edited by Herbert Van Thal and Jane Soames Nickerson
 * Hilaire Belloc's Prefaces, Written for Fellow Authors (Chicago: Loyala University Press, 1971) editor J. A. De Chantigny
 * Distributist Perspectives: Essays On Economics of Justice and Charity (Norfolk, VA: IHS Press, 2003–2004) with Herbert W. Shove, George Maxwell, G. K. Chesterton, Arthur J. Penty, H. J. Massingham, Eric Gill, and Harold Robbins
 * Cautionary Tales for Children (New York: Harcourt, Inc., 2002) illustrated by Edward Gorey
 * The Way Out (Catholic Authors Press, 2006) introduction by Robert Phillips

Articles

 * "A Last Word on Calderon," The Irish Monthly, Vol. 19, No. 219, Sep. 1891.
 * "A Conscript's View of the French Army," The Contemporary Review, Vol. LXIII, June 1893.
 * "The Liberal Tradition." In Essays in Liberalism, Cassell & Company, 1897.
 * "'Democracy and Liberty' Reviewed," The Catholic World, Vol. LXVI, October 1897/March 1898.
 * "The Historian," The Living Age, Vol. IX, October/December 1900.
 * "The Sea-Fight of Ushant," Scribner's, Vol. XXXIV, No. 2, August 1903.
 * "The Cambridge History of the French Revolution," The Bookman, Vol. XXVI, No. 156, September 1904.
 * "The Protectionist Movement in England," The International Quarterly, Vol. X, October 1904/January 1905.
 * "The Young Napoleon," The Bookman, Vol. XXVIII, No. 166, July 1905.
 * "Napoleon II," The Bookman, Vol. XXIX, No. 170, November 1905.
 * "Catholics and the Education Bill" 1906.
 * "Ten Pages of Taine," The International Quarterly, Vol. XII, October 1905/January 1906.
 * "Contemporary France," The Bookman, Vol. XXIX, No. 173, February 1906.
 * "Thoughts About Modern Thought," The New Age, Vol. II, No. 6, 7 December 1907.
 * "Limits of Direct Taxation," The Contemporary Review, Vol. XCIII, February 1908.
 * "Not a Reply," The New Age, Vol. II, No. 15, 8 February 1908.
 * "A Question," The New Age, Vol. II, No. 21, 21 March 1908.
 * "The Inflation of Assessment," The Dublin Review, Vol. CXLII, No. 284-285, January/April 1908.
 * "The Recess and the Congo," The New Age, Vol. III, No. 15, 8 August 1908.
 * "The Taxation of Rent," The Dublin Review, Vol. CXLV, No. 290-291, July/October 1909.
 * "The International. I. The Ferrer Case," The Dublin Review, Vol. CXLVI, No. 292-293, January/April 1910.
 * "The International. II. The Motive Case," The Dublin Review, Vol. CXLVI, No. 292-293, January/April 1910.
 * as part of "The Home University Library of Modern Knowledge," Henry Holt and Company, 1911
 * "Lord Acton on the French Revolution," The Nineteenth Century and After, Vol. LXIX, January/June 1911.
 * "The Economics of 'Cheap'," The Dublin Review, Vol. CXLVIII, No. 296-297, January/April 1911.
 * "The Catholic Conscience of History," The Catholic World, Vol. XCII, October 1910/March 1911.
 * "What was the Roman Empire?," The Catholic World, Vol. XCII, October 1910/March 1911.
 * "What was the Church in the Roman Empire?," The Catholic World, Vol. XCII, October 1910/March 1911.
 * "What was the 'Fall' of the Roman Empire?," The Catholic World, Vol. XCII, October 1910/March 1911.
 * "The Beginnings of the Nations," The Catholic World, Vol. XCII, October 1910/March 1911.
 * "What Happened in Britain," Part II, The Catholic World, Vol. XCIII, April/September 1911.
 * "The Middle Ages," The Catholic World, Vol. XCIII, April/September 1911.
 * "The Dark Ages," The Catholic World, Vol. XCIII, No. 556, April/September 1911.
 * "On a Method of Writing History," The Dublin Review, Vol. CXLIX, No. 298-299, July/October 1911.
 * "Catholicism and History," The Dublin Review, Vol. CXLIX, No. 298-299, July/October 1911.
 * "What was the Reformation?," Part II, The Catholic World, Vol. XCIV, October 1911/March 1912.
 * "The Results of the Reformation," Part II, The Catholic World, Vol. XCIV, October 1911/March 1912.
 * "The Entry Into the Dark Ages," The Dublin Review, Vol. CL, No. 300-301, January/April 1912.
 * "On a Very Special Calling," The Century Magazine, Vol. LXXXIV, No. 1, May 1912.
 * "The Fairy Omnibus," The Century Magazine, Vol. LXXXIV, No. 3, July 1912.
 * "On the Secret of Diplomatic Success," The Century Magazine, Vol. LXXXIV, No°. 6, October 1912.
 * "The Servile State," Everyman, Vol. I, No. 7, 29 November 1912.
 * "On a Great Wind." In A Century of Great Essays, J. M. Dent & Sons, 1913.
 * "Should Lloyd George Imitate Napoleon?," Everyman, Vol. I, No. 23, 21 March 1913.
 * "The Battle of Waterloo," Everyman, Vol. II, No. 27, 18 April 1913.
 * "Professor Bury's History of Freedom of Thought," The Dublin Review, Vol. CLIV, No. 308-309, January/April 1914.
 * "The Church and French Democracy," Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, The Catholic World, Vol. XCVIII, October 1913/March 1914; Part VI, Vol. XCIX, April/September 1914.
 * "The Modern French Temper," The Dublin Review, Vol. CLV, No. 310-311, July/October 1914.
 * The Historic Thames, Wayfarers Library, J.M. Dent & Sons, 1914.
 * "The Geography of the War," The Geographical Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, Jan. 1915.
 * "High Lights of the French Revolution," The Century Magazine, Vol. LXXXVIII, No. 5, September 1914; Part II, No. 6, October 1914; Part III, Vol. LXXXIX, No. 2, December 1914; Part IV, N°. 4, February 1915; Part V, N°. 6, April 1915.
 * "The Economics of War," The Dublin Review, Vol. CLVI, No. 312-313, January/April 1915.
 * "Certain Social Tendencies of the War," The New Age, Vol. XIX, No. 8, 1916, pp. 174–175.
 * "A Page of Gibbon," The Dublin Review, Vol. CLIX, No. 314-315, July/October 1916.
 * "The Re-creation of Property," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 6, 1916, pp. 125–127.
 * "The Present Position and Power of the Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 7, 1916, pp. 150–151.
 * "The Present Position and Power of the Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 8, 1916, pp. 173–175.
 * "The Present Position and Power of the Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 9, 1916, pp. 197–199.
 * "The Present Position and Power of the Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 10, 1917, pp. 221–222.
 * "The Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 10, 1917, p. 237.
 * "The Present Position and Power of the Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 11, 1917, pp. 245–246.
 * "The Present Position and Power of the Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 12, 1917, pp. 271–272.
 * "The Present Position and Power of the Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 13, 1917, p. 294.
 * "The Present Position and Power of the Press," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 14, 1917, pp. 317–318.
 * "A Landmark," The New Age, Vol. XX, No. 22, 1917, pp. 509–510.
 * "Socialism and the Servile State," The Catholic World, Vol. CV, April/September 1917.
 * "The Priest," The Catholic World, Vol. CV, April/September 1917.
 * "A Preface to Gibbon," Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 6, No. 24, Dec. 1917.
 * "A Political Survey," Land & Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2904, January 1918.
 * "The Prime Minister's Speech," Land & Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2905, January 1918.
 * "The New State in Europe," Part III; Part IV, Land and Water, No. 2909, February 1918.
 * "Enemy Reinforcement," Land and Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2910, February 1918.
 * "The Meaning of Ukraine," Land and Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2911, February 1918.
 * "German War Medals," Land and Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2911, February 1918.
 * "The Public Mood," Land and Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2912, February 1918.
 * "The German Offer," Land and Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2913, March 1918.
 * "East and West," Land and Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2914, March 1918.
 * "The Great Battle," Land and Water, Vol. LXX, No. 2916, March 1918; Part II, Vol. LXXI, No. 2917, April 1918.
 * "The Continued Battle," Land and Water, Vol. LXXI, No. 2918, April 1918.
 * "Battle of the Lys," Land and Water, Vol. LXXI, No. 2919, April 1918.
 * "The American Effort," Land and Water, Vol. LXXI, No. 2921, May 1918.
 * "The Delay and the Attack," Land and Water, Vol. LXXI, No. 2925, May 1918.
 * "Battle of the Tardenois," Land and Water, Vol. LXXI, No. 2926, June 1918.
 * "Battle of the Matz," Land and Water, Vol. LXXI, No. 2929, June 1918.
 * "The Distributist State," Part II, The Catholic World, Vol. CVI, October 1917/March 1918.
 * "Gibbon and the True Cross," Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 7, No. 26, Jun. 1918.
 * "Gibbon and the Temporal Power," Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 7, No. 27, Sep. 1918.
 * "On the Word 'Christianity'," The Catholic World, Vol. CVII, April/September 1918.
 * "State Arbitration in Peril." In The Limits of State Industrial Control, J. M. Dent & Son Ltd., 1919.
 * "The Recovery of Europe," The Lotus Magazine, Vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 1919; Part II, Vol. 10, No. 2, February 1919.
 * "A Visit to Strassburg," The Living Age, Vol. XIV, No. 693, April 1919.
 * "Vanished Towns," The Living Age, Vol. 14, No. 709, May 1919.
 * "Paris and London – A Study in Contrasts," The Living Age, September 1919.
 * "Three British Criticisms of Ludendorff," The Living Age, November 1919.
 * "Gibbon and Julian the Apostate," Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 8, No. 32, Dec. 1919.
 * "An Essay on Controversy," The Living Age, March 1920.
 * "Cursing the Climate," The Living Age, March 1920.
 * "The House of Commons," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 12, 1920, pp. 183–184.
 * "The House of Commons: II," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 13, 1920, pp. 197–199.
 * "The House of Commons: III," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 14, 1920, pp. 216–218.
 * "The House of Commons: IV," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 15, 1920, pp. 233–235.
 * "The House of Commons: V," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 16, 1920, pp. 249–250.
 * "The House of Commons: VI," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 17, 1920, pp. 265–267.
 * "The House of Commons: VIII," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 18, 1920, pp. 285–287.
 * "The House of Commons: IX," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 20, 1920, pp. 316–318.
 * "The House of Commons: X," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 21, 1920, pp. 333–335.
 * "The House of Commons: XI," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 22, 1920, pp. 348–340.
 * "The House of Commons: XII," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 23, 1920, pp. 364–365.
 * "The House of Commons: XIII," The New Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 24, 1920, pp. 380–383.
 * "The House of Commons: XIV," The New Age, Vol. XXVII, No. 2, 1920, pp. 21–24.
 * "The Led," The New Age, Vol. XXVII, No. 4, 1920, pp. 52–53.
 * "An Example," The New Age, Vol. XXVII, No. 9, 1920, pp. 133–134.
 * "On Accent," The Living Age, June 1920.
 * "An Analysis of the 'Lettres Provinciales'," Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 9, No. 35, Sep. 1920.
 * "Madame Tussaud and Her Famous Waxworks," The Living Age, September 1920.
 * "On Progress," Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 9, No. 36, Dec. 1920.
 * "The Mowing of a Field." In Modern Essays, Harcourt, Brace & Company. New York, 1921.
 * "The Death of St. Martin," The Living Age, February 1921.
 * "Dante the Monarchist," The Catholic World, Vol. CXIII, September 1921.
 * "On Foreign Affairs," The New Age, Vol. XXIX, No. 22, 1921, pp. 257–258.
 * "On Foreign Affairs: II," The New Age, Vol. XXIX, No. 23, 1921, pp. 268–269.
 * "On Foreign Affairs: III," The New Age, Vol. XXIX, No. 24, 1921, pp. 279–280.
 * "On Foreign Affairs: IV," The New Age, Vol. XXIX, No. 25, 1921, pp. 291–293.
 * "Question and Answer," The New Age, Vol. XXIX, No. 26, 1921, p. 304.
 * "Gibbon and the Ebionites," The Dublin Review, Vol. CLXIX, No. 339, October/December 1921.
 * "On the Approach of an Awful Doom." In Modern English Essays, J. M. Dent & Sons. London, 1922.
 * "On a Unknown Country." In Modern English Essays, J. M. Dent & Sons. London, 1922.
 * "On Kind Hearts Being More Than Coronets," The Living Age, July 1922.
 * "Al Wasal, or the Merger," The Living Age, Vol. CCCXV, No. 4093, 16 December 1922.
 * "The Jews," 1922.
 * "The American Alliance," The Living Age, June 1923.
 * "On the Cathedral at Seville and 'The Misantrophe'," The Bookman, Vol. LVIII, No. 4, December 1923.
 * "Hoko and Moko," The Living Age, February 1924.
 * "A Catholic View of Religious America," The Century Magazine, April 1924.
 * "Wash Day – British and American Style," The Outlook, April 1924.
 * "A Pedestrian in Spain," The Living Age, November 1924.
 * "Gibbon and the First Council of Ephesus," Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 13, No. 51, Sep. 1924; Part II, Vol. 13, No. 52, Dec. 1924.
 * "Nordic or Not?," The Living Age, April 1925.
 * "A Chinese Litany of Odd Numbers," The Living Age, June 1925.
 * "Mrs. Piozzi's Rasselas," The Saturday Review, Vol. II, No. 3, August 1925.
 * "The Reproof of Gluttony," The Forum, Vol. LXXVI, No. 3, September 1926.
 * "Vathek," The Saturday Review, Vol. IV, No. 12, October 1927.
 * "Carlyle's French Revolution." In Modern Essays, Selected by Norman G. Brett-James, Dutton, 1930.
 * "The Peril to Letters," The Living Age, January 1930.
 * "Advice to a Young Man," The Living Age, March 1930.
 * "Mark My Words!," The Saturday Review, Vol. VII, No. 34, March 1931.
 * "On Translation," The Living Age, September/October 1931.
 * "Machine versus Man," The Living Age, June 1932.
 * "Britain's Secret Policy," The Living Age, December 1932.
 * "The Restoration of Property," The American Review, April–November 1933.
 * "Man and the Machine." In Science in the Changing World, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1933.
 * "Science and Religion," The American Review, Vol. II, No. 4, February 1934.
 * "Parliament and Monarchy," The American Review, Vol. II, No. 5, March 1934.
 * "Dimnet and the French Mind," The Saturday Review, Vol. XI, No. 36, March 1935.
 * "Gilbert Keith Chesterton," The Saturday Review, Vol. XVI, No. 10, July 1936.
 * "G. K. Chesterton and Modern England," Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 25, No. 99, Sep. 1936.
 * "The New League," The American Review, Vol. VIII, No. 1, November 1936.
 * "A Letter to Bernard Shaw," The American Review, Vol. VIII, No. 3, January 1937.
 * "English Monarchy," The American Review, Vol. VIII, No. 4, February 1937.
 * "Two Texts," The American Review, Vol. IX, No. 1, April 1937.
 * "Neither Capitalism Nor Socialism," The American Mercury, Vol. XLI, No. 163, July 1937.
 * "The Way Out," Social Justice, February 1938.
 * "The Problem Stated," Social Justice, March 1938.
 * "The Wage Worker," Social Justice, March 1938.
 * "Insufficiency and Insecurity," Social Justice, March 1938.
 * "Ruin of the Small Owner," Social Justice, March 1938.
 * "Ruin of the Small Store Keeper," Social Justice, April 1938.
 * "The Proletarian Mind," Social Justice, April 1938.
 * "Usury," Social Justice, April 1938.
 * "The Disease of Monopoly," Social Justice, April 1938.
 * "Capitalism Kills Its Own Market," Social Justice, May 1938.
 * "The Suppressed Truth," Social Justice, May 1938.
 * "The End Is Slavery," Social Justice, May 1938.
 * "The Way Out," Social Justice, June 1938.
 * "Communism – the Theory," Social Justice, June 1938.
 * "Communism Is Wicked," Social Justice, June 1938.
 * "Communism Has Failed," Social Justice, June 1938.
 * "Property," Social Justice, July 1938.
 * "Secured Capitalism," Social Justice, July 1938.
 * "The Way Out," Social Justice, July 1938.
 * "The Way Out: The Differential Tax," Social Justice, July 1938.
 * "The Way Out: The Guild System," Social Justice, August 1938.
 * "The Way Out: The Small Producer," Social Justice, August 1938.
 * "The Small Distributor," Social Justice, August 1938.
 * "The Way Out: The Functions of the State," Social Justice, August 1938.
 * "The Way Out: Summary and Conclusion," Social Justice, August 1938.
 * "Prussia Not Hitler Must Perish," The Living Age, January 1940.
 * "An English Need," The Irish Monthly, Vol. 68, No. 804, Jun. 1940.
 * "Hitler Loses Round One," The Living Age, December 1940.

Miscellany

 * James Anthony Froude, Essays in Literature and History, with an introduction by Hilaire Belloc, J.M. Dent & Sons, 1906.
 * Thomas Carlyle, The French Revolution: A History, with an introduction by Hilaire Belloc, J.M. Dent & Sons, 1906.
 * Johannes Jörgensen, Lourdes, with a preface by Hilaire Belloc, Longmans, Green & Co., 1914.
 * Hoffman Nickerson, The Inquisition, with a preface by Hilaire Belloc, John Bale, Sons & Danielsson Ltd., 1923.
 * P. G. Wodehouse, (ed.), "On Conversations in Trains." In A Century of Humour, Hutchinson & Co., 1934.
 * Brian Magee, The English Recusants, with an introduction by Hilaire Belloc, Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd., 1938.
 * C. John McCloskey, (ed.), The Essential Belloc: A Prophet for Our Times, Saint Benedict Press, 2010.

title: Hilaire Belloc bibliography


text:
National Do Not Call List

The National Do Not Call List (DNCL) (Liste nationale de numéros de télécommunication exclus) is a list administered by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) that enables residents of Canada to decide whether or not to receive telemarketing calls. It was first announced by the Government of Canada on 13 December 2004.

The DNCL has been labelled a "disaster" and over a decade after the law's creation, many telemarketers are either unaware or do not follow the rules imposed by the DNCL.

The DNCL continues to receive heavy criticism, the latest being from Senator Percy Downe who referred to it as "totally useless", due to the costly but totally ineffective enforcement, the large number of exempt groups and the ability for anyone from anywhere in the world to purchase sets of phone numbers for relatively low fees, and then abuse the Do Not Call List as a calling list. Senator Downe cited multiple examples of constituents, whom he had personally added to the list, receiving a sudden increase in telemarketing calls three months later.

On 20 April 2009, the CRTC announced that telephone and fax numbers on the list would be listed on the DNCL for five years, extended from the three years at the list's inception. Numbers are now on the list indefinitely.

Overview
Legislation entitled Bill C-37, An Act to amend the Telecommunications Act, introduced in the House of Commons, was given first reading on 13 December 2004. It addressed telemarketing calls in Canada and would allow people to sign up to prevent certain telemarketers from contacting them. It received royal assent on 25 November 2005 and came into force on 30 June 2006.

The legislation gives the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) authority to establish a national do not call list, to establish procedures to administer the Act and to levy penalties for violations.

Starting 30 September 2008, residents of Canada were able to register their telephone numbers on the list online, or by telephone, fax or teletype.

Exemptions
The Do Not Call List exempts Canadian registered charities, political parties, riding associations, candidates, pollsters and newspapers of general circulation for the purpose of soliciting subscriptions. Telemarketing calls from organizations with whom residents have an existing business relationship are also exempt. Telemarketers may also still call if a resident gave them permission in a written form or verbally. This law also does not extend its protections to non-Canadian phone numbers.

Paragraph 41.7(4) of The Telecommunications Act requires that every exempted telemarketer "shall maintain their own do not call list and shall ensure that no telecommunication is made on their behalf to any person who has requested that they receive no telecommunication...". Unlike the DNCL Rules, the Act itself makes no provision for a grace period or expiry, so all do not call requests must be honoured immediately and permanently.

In letters dated 27 June 2008, to the Canadian Marketing Association (CMA) and the Canadian Bankers Association (CBA), CRTC Chairman Konrad von Finckenstein personally ruled that do not call requests from third parties, such as iOptOut.ca, are to be considered "...as valid requests and must be honoured." Due to its overwhelming popularity, iOptOut.ca is currently being upgraded and improved.

On 13 November 2008, the CRTC declined a request from telecommunications provider Rogers Wireless to permit Canadian wireless customers to block unsolicited SMS text messages through the DNCL.

Timeline
The privacy benefits the list will achieve remain uncertain. A working group of the CRTC held hearings concerning the planned implementation of the list. It submitted recommendations on 26 July 2006.

On 3 July 2007, the CRTC announced it would be issuing a request for proposals to suppliers willing to provide this service. On 21 December 2007, the CRTC announced that it had picked Bell Canada to operate the National Do Not Call List for five years. It is funded from subscription fees paid by telemarketers, rather than relying on fees by end citizens. It became operational on 30 September 2008.

Criticism
Michael Geist, professor of law at the University of Ottawa, has criticized the changes adopted in the amended Act. He observed that the legislation contained too many exemptions which would not result in a significant decrease in calls for subscribers of the DNCL. Geist expressed particular concern about the extent and duration of the existing business relationship exception. In a 2009 article for the Toronto Star, Geist labelled the CRTC's do-not-call list a "disaster" and recommended that parliament return to the original version of Bill C-37 by eliminating all exemptions. He further recommended cross-border cooperation to resolve jurisdictional issues and immediate tough enforcement to send a strong signal to violators.

In November 2008, it was reported that the CRTC had received thousands of complaints from individuals about the implementation of the Do Not Call List. People reported that they had actually experienced a notable increase in the number of calls since registering for the list, and were starting to get calls at cellular phone numbers that had never received telemarketing calls before.

However, a VoxPop study found that 80% of those registered on the DNCL had noticed a reduction in calls, while 13% had seen an increase. The study concluded that the most likely explanation for the increase was due to timing of the launch of the DNCL with the financial crisis of 2007–2010 which was hitting American and other foreign companies harder than Canadian, and where unscrupulous telemarketers that did not care about Canadian laws were using random dialers to find new business.

In January 2009, numerous media and consumer advocacy organizations reported that anyone can use false information pretending to be a telemarketer and download a set of numbers from the list for a $50 fee. It took their reporter ten minutes to do so. It has been proposed that list may be being downloaded and used as a telemarketing list overseas, where there's little that can be done as the CRTC has no jurisdiction outside of Canada. Konrad von Finckenstein, Chair of the CRTC, responded to these allegations on 16 June 2009, labeling them an urban myth, and stating that the Government had looked into the claims and that there was "no evidence to substantiate them".

Technological shortcomings
A notable shortcoming of the Canadian implementation of the do-not-call list is that the list of numbers is given to telemarketers in plain text, in the form of a simple spreadsheet or CSV file without any protection or traceability. Technologies for securing personal data are readily available, as shown by Australia's Do Not Call Register, which "is a secure database where you can list your numbers to avoid receiving unsolicited telemarketing calls and marketing faxes." In contrast to the CRTC's uncontrolled distribution of telephone number lists, the Australian system consists of a "List Washing Service", precisely as proposed by the minority opinion which was disregarded by the CRTC.

On 3 July 2007, in Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-47, the CRTC disregarded the non-consensus report from the DNCL Operations Working Group, which had strongly recommended against allowing telemarketers to download unmarked, untraceable copies of the do-not-call list. With the aim of protecting the confidentiality of cell and unlisted numbers, the non-consensus report had instead advocated a Query/Response methodology, wherein telemarketers would be able to query only the do-not-call status of numbers they already had in their possession. Although the CRTC had rejected the Query/Response methodology, citing grounds of operational cost and complexity, a one-number-at-a-time Query/Response turned out to be so operationally simple and inexpensive that it is provided by the CRTC, free of charge, without restriction, to anyone who cares to use it. Other jurisdictions such as the USA provide similar Query/Response functions to checklists of small sets of numbers simultaneously, also free of charge. Jurisdictions such as Australia protect subscriber privacy, precisely as envisioned by the minority report, by keeping the list in the form of a secure database, and providing only a "List Washing Service".

The CRTC's decision to expire registrations is regarded by citizens' rights groups as a technical shortcoming that adds unnecessary operational cost and complexity to the system, as well as limiting registrants' freedom to express their wishes. On 17 June 2008, the USA made registrations permanent until the number is disconnected or reassigned, citing "...benefits to the public and to consumer privacy interests...".

Another possibility to prevent using the plain text list as a list of people to call is to provide honeypot numbers, unique to each telemarketer. If a telemarketer, or anyone he has given the list to, then calls one of the honeypot numbers, stiff penalties can be applied to the telemarketer. If the originating number of a violating call is either foreign or disguised, the CRTC could apply the penalties to the telco which delivered the call to the subscriber's line since that telco acted as an agent of the telemarketer by delivering the call.. There is no indication from the CRTC whether honeypots have been implemented as part of the DNCL.

title: National Do Not Call List