text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2024-06/CFI for mainspace constructed languages

Option to exclude all constructed languages
Option 2 reserves Esperanto to remain in the main namespace. I think there should be an option to relegate all constructed languages to the appendix namespace, including Esperanto. I'd likely lean toward it being in the main namespace due to the fact that there have been at least some native speakers, but I think it's a reasonable option to include. Does anyone else agree? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

 * Hmmm, personally, I feel that it'd almost certainly fail. Out of the discussions I've seen this would be the first mention of Esperanto being relegated to the Appendix, so I don't feel like there'd be appetite for it. AG202 (talk) 23:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure but it failing would just verify that consensus is explicitly in favor of it being in the main namespace. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I would hope that Proposal 1 & Proposal 2 would make that clear. I've said it before, but I generally find votes that the proposer knows is going to fail ahead of time to be wastes of time. AG202 (talk) 00:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Reasonable. I won't push for it, then. Thanks. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I think the fact that Esperanto is the only conlang in the world with a community of native speakers sets it apart from other conlangs, and justifies a different level of discretion from other conlangs. For most languages we record words as used by native speakers, which we can't do for most conlangs as they have no native speakers and, theoretically, anyone could just make up words and they would be "legitimate words" in the language. However, since Esperanto actually has native speakers, we can actually record words as-used instead of how people who made up the word would like them to be used. Also, according to Wikipedia, Esperanto has actually made it into the education systems of some countries such as Hungary.  Thats not to say I'm a fan of Esperanto or anything, I'm just saying that I feel as though it's distinct enough from other conlangs to be considered separately. —  S AMEER  (؂・؄・؏) 23:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Option to use objective criteria instead of making this a popularity contest
I totally don't understand the point of this discussion and this vote. The Main Page of this project writes clearly: "It aims to describe all words of all languages using definitions and descriptions in English." Constructed languages are languages, so why does the label "constructed" compel so many people to feel the need to fight them? At present, we have Esperanto, Volapük, Ido and Interlingua. All four of them are represented on a page like this one, amidst hundreds of other languages. Do they really hurt the eye so much that they would have to be removed? Will that make the list any better? Or is it because people fear a tsunami of conlangs if they are not regulated by some policy? If so, that fear is not unreasonable: there are hundreds of reasonably developed conlangs and thousands of less developed ones, mostly used only by their creators. Of course we don't want hundreds of conlangers to create entries for their youngest pet project. But this can easily be addressed by applying certain criteria.

Alright, but using native speakers as a criterion is a bad idea, because auxiliary languages are not meant to have native speakers by design: they are meant to serve as an L2 for as many people as possible. The fact that Esperanto has native speakers is nothing but a side effect of its popularity, and as far as I know, all native speakers of Esperanto have been raised bilingually anyway. For the record, apparently there have been native speakers of Volapük in the past as well, and in 2022 suddenly 26 native speakers of Ido popped up in Finland, out of the blue. But why should native speakers be a criterion at all, since we allow so many other languages that are either extinct or never even had native speakers at all? Just like historical linguistics, interlinguistics is a science, not some kind of hobby. And dictionaries are not only there for speakers, but also for people who study them for other reasons, including scientists. How many people speak Phoenician, Hittite, Old Church Slavonic, Biblical Gothic, Polabian or Old Tupi? Probably less than the number of people who speak Interlingua or even Volapük. Does that invalidate translations into or from those languages? Of course not!

The current condition, a valid ISO code, already limits the number of potential conlangs to 24. The criteria mentioned in the policy for creating new projects narrow down their number even further: "If the proposal is for an artificial language such as Esperanto, it must have a reasonable degree of recognition as determined by discussion. (Some recognition criteria include, but are not limited to: independently proved number of speakers, use as an auxiliary language outside of online communities created solely for the purpose, usage outside of Wikimedia, publication of works in the language for general sale.) Notwithstanding the existence of an ISO 639–3 code, fictional languages are not eligible for projects." We could even take this one step further: allow only those constructed languages that match these criteria AND have been approved by the LangCom, in other words: only those languages that have their own Wikipedia. That way, we have a criterion that is both objective and practical. Objective, because every aspect is thoroughly verified by a group of knowledgeable people (LangCom). And practical, because it can be helpful both for users of these Wikipedias and for those who want to keep an eye on them. Isn't that a better solution than organizing a popularity contest?

Two last remarks: first of all, deleting everything about Interlingua, Ido and Volapük would be a slap in the face of the volunteers who have worked on them for years. It is simply indecent to allow people to work on something for years, just to wipe it out because some others don't like constructed languages. It's not like their work takes up an awful lot of space, nor does it stand in anyone's way, nor is there anything wrong with its content. And secondly, appendixifying everything not a good idea, because that way it becomes one-way traffic. Myself, I am more of a user than a contributor, and I use Wiktionary on a daily base for looking up translations from English into other languages. IJzeren Jan (talk) 23:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 * @IJzeren Jan: No entries are being deleted. What would actually happen if this vote were to pass would be that the Interlingua, Ido, & Volapük entries would be moved to the Appendix. The same thing happened with Lojban, Novial, & Interlingue, and as seen by the linked categories, their entries still exist. So again, the entries aren't being deleted, it just won't be in the mainspace. If you think about it, Reconstructed languages aren't even in the mainspace either. As for the translations, they may be removed but honestly, that's something that can be discussed further later on. And as for the "motto" that Wiktionary uses, I've also been a critic of it so it doesn't sway my thoughts either way.

 * Moving on to the other main point: I have yet to see a policy here that relies on other Wikimedia projects, such as relying on LangCom, though these users: would have more information on that. As such, it would not be practical at all for us to use whether or not a Wikipedia "exists" as a guideline. It's also not entirely "objective". I've seen LangCom's procedures, and it's really up to individual people in the end, with their scope being entirely different to begin with. This also doesn't take into account the projects that were grandfathered in like the Lojban Wikipedia which likely would not have been approved if proposed under the current guidelines.

 * Regarding Ido, you bring up a good point, but I'm suspicious of the numbers and what the dataset actually describes. The same data states that there's 1 Esperanto speaker and 1 Latin speaker. If we take these to mean "native", then there has to be community of Ido speakers in the country, but has it been actually been verified? We'd need to do more digging.

 * Overall, this project works on our own consensus. I framed the vote after combing through tons of discussions and comments, and the vast majority of editors in those discussions have asked for this change. It's not just a popularity contest, as seen by the recent addition of Eskayan to the list after doing meaningful research about its usage. It's hard for the community to agree on anything to begin with, but with this, it's almost a universally wanted change, and as such, I'm moving it along with hopes of actually getting it done. AG202 (talk) 02:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, looking at Ido Wikipedia's active user list, it says that there are 55 active users, but if you actually take the time to look at the contributions, the vast majority of them are changes to image files, new automated messages, category changes, or nothing at all. It's practically dead. It's also one of the Wikipedia's that was created (2004) before LangCom was instituted and during a time when "criteria for creation of new language editions of Wikipedia were poorly defined and there was little process in place for determining which requests would be acted upon." That's part of why I don't like using the existence of a Wikipedia as a guideline. AG202 (talk) 02:47, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Please explain this to me: what is the point of moving these entries to the appendix, if they are staying here anyway? What is there to be gained from that move? You see, my whole problem with this thing is the absence of a rationale: they only argument I'm seeing is that Toki Pona has more users than Volapük, and that's why Volapük, Interlingua and Ido must disappear. That is, of course, complete nonsense! It might as well be used as an argument for including Toki Pona, or for defining better criteria for inclusion instead of organizing a vote about three individual languages.
 * And as for the translations: I just checked and all Interlingue translations were deleted by a bot simultaneously with the transfer to appendix space. Even if that's not going to happen right away, we both know that it's going to happen soon afterwards anyway.
 * The advantage of my proposal is that we'd leave the decision to people who actually know what they are talking about. And of course, I am aware of the fact that many projects were started before there was a clear policy, but also take into account that LangCom has approved editions in Lingua Franca Nova and Kotava, both languages with a very small number of users. And those decision were based on policy. Of course, I am aware of the fact that every project establishes its own rules, but those rules should not be based on popularity contests (because I still believe that that is exactly what this is).
 * At last, let me say something about those 55 active Ido users. Please take a look at the List of Wikipedias. You'll notice that even with this admittedly low number Ido safely belongs to the upper half. For comparison: Gujarati, a language with more than 60 million speakers, has 67 active users. Amharic, the national language of Ethiopia, has 57. Both including the same bots, username changes etc. Also, if you look at the number of articles, and the number of edits made, you'll see that all three Wikipedia editions belong to the upper half as well. To stay with Ido: in two years, its number of articles has grown from 32,803 to 48,274. Quite a lot for a language with only a handful users, don't you think? Not that it should matter much though, because more importantly: wouldn't you agree that encyclopedias and dictionaries are there for the people who use them, and not for the people who write them? IJzeren Jan (talk) 19:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * In the end, additions/removals to WT:CFI would need to be decided by consensus anyways. Option 1 provides us a way to do it without necessitating a formal vote every single time. Whether we like it or not, there's not a consensus right now to base this change on LangCom or the existence of other Wikipedias. That's just not how we work here. Relying on the existence of a Wikipedia would also force languages like Lojban to come back to the mainspace which would violate completed votes and long-established consensus. I'm not going to put something for a vote that I know will fail and hasn't been discussed fully. If you'd like to propose the policy, feel free to create a vote or make a BP thread. I'm also acutely aware of the other languages that have low activity; I took a look at that list yesterday. However, the difference is that they are not constructed languages and have, as stated, millions of native speakers, and as such, have strong literary and oral histories outside of Wikipedia, and would not need Wikipedia articles to validate their existence. As for Ido, I'm going to bring it up in the current BP discussion and see what people think. AG202 (talk) 19:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, but I still haven't heard a single meritorical argument. Without it, it remains a case of IDONTLIKEIT, even if 99% of all Wiktionary users agree about it. So please enlighten me: how is this operation going to make Wiktionary a better place?
 * You speak about long literal and oral histories, but Volapük has those as well, and the fact that its community is small at the moment does not change the fact that it has had hundreds of thousands of users in the past. Even today, a monthly in Volapük has been appearing since 1989 without ever skipping a single month, resulting in 100 solid pages of text each year. How does that make it any worse than Phoenician (no speakers at all, known only from a number of inscriptions)? And why should it make a difference that Volapük is a constructed language? After all, every human language has a certain degree of artificiality, and there is a large grey zone between both extremes on the scale of artificiality. IJzeren Jan (talk) 20:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * One benefit, brought up at Votes/2021-02/Moving Interlingue entries to the Appendix, is that if moved to the Appendix, the threshold for inclusion of a term in Volapük for example, would be lowered, only requiring one use in a durably archived source. However, in the mainspace, as is right now, Volapük is a WT:WDL, meaning that it if a term is sent to RFV, it'd require 3 uses in durably archived sources to pass. Looking at Category:Volapük lemmas and going through some entries, a lot of them would likely fail RFV and be deleted. It's just a matter of time before someone actually goes through them, seeing as only 31 entries have quotations out of 2590 lemmas which is very low. This vote would at least allow them to be moved to the Appendix ahead of time, so that'd be a benefit. AG202 (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you have any idea how much books and magazines have been published in Volapük? I am not even speaking about the dozens of grammars and dictionaries, but also about literary and other works. Many of which, of course, are not available online; and if they are, most likely not in a searchable format. But even without those, it wouldn't be a problem for me to produce a hundred quotes a day based on the sources that ARE available.
 * I admit that I had never noticed those quotation categories before. I just had a look at them, starting with my native language, Dutch. It has a total of 58,081 lemmas, of which only 1309 have quotations. Frisian has 1748 lemmas, of which only 21 have quotations. Amharic has 1578 lemmas, of which only have quotations. And of the  Esperanto lemmas only  have quotations. I didn't check any other languages, but based on these four, it's safe to assume that for most languages goes that only 1-10% of the lemmas have quotations. It is not your intention to have all Dutch, Frisian, Amharic and Esperanto entries without quotations deleted, I suppose. So why then, pray tell, should Volapük be an exception? IJzeren Jan (talk) 23:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It's not my intention to run any language, but I'd note that Frisian & Amharic are not WDLs like Volapük is, and as such do not require quotes and even allow 1 mention to count. We also do not allow self-published works to count to CFI, so I'd keep that in mind. And yes the same regulations apply to Esperanto, though I expect it to be much easier to show usage. AG202 (talk) 23:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * But on the other hand, Dutch is a WDL, right? So that means that 98% of all Dutch lemmas do NOT fulfil the criteria for inclusion. Forgive me for going on about this, but I still don't understand WHY this, and many other things you mentioned, should be a problem in the case of Volapük and not in the case of 4800 other languages. IJzeren Jan (talk) 23:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It should be abundantly clear the difference between Dutch and Volapük. A lot of Dutch terms fall under the other prong of WT:ATTEST: clear widespread use. Constructed languages have their own section in WT:CFI; they’re going to be treated differently regardless. AG202 (talk) 00:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @AG202, let me first thank you for your civil tone in this discussion. I honestly appreciate that! That said, I still fail to understand the why of this operation. Instead of a single objective reason, all I see is a whole series of ad hoc arguments, none of which could stand on its own legs, and the only recurring argument seems to be that a majority of the community wants it. But why does the very label "constructed" evoke such reactions? I know very well that there are people who think all constructed languages are nonsense, but of all places, people at Wiktionary ought to know better, wouldn't you agree? I mean, we are talking about languages of great historical importance here, not about some one-man hobby thing without any impact. IJzeren Jan (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @IJzeren Jan: Thank you for the kind comments about tone, and I appreciate your civility as well. Part of the issue that we've been encountering as of late is that we keep getting BP threads about other conlangs that invoke the question of "why do we include Volapük, but not Interslavic", and from what I've seen, the userbase is entirely against adding more conlangs, so this vote hopes to create a system where there's more criteria for conlangs vs our lack of actual criteria right now that's basically based on vibes. AG202 (talk) 15:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Or let's put it differently: if I manage to provide, say, 250 Volapük lemmas with three quotations within a week, would you consider removing Volapük from your proposal? IJzeren Jan (talk) 23:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I support any addition of quotations in general, it's one of my tenants here with creating entries, but I cannot guarantee that it'd remove Volapük from the list. AG202 (talk) 15:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @AG202 The entries aren't deleted but all of the translations added were. Here's a sample of the bot merrily undoing the thousands of entries I spent weeks adding to when the decision was made for Interlingue/Occidental. Mithridates (talk) 02:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * My point exactly. One month before the Interlingua entries were deleted, it was formally decided that Interlingue was among the languages qualified for inclusion. And then, suddenly, it takes only 15 people to decide to delete it anyway. It would have been a different story if it had been made clear from the beginning that these languages are not welcome; but explicitly inviting people for twenty years to work on something and then deleting it all for no other reason than that a few people don't like it... No, that's definitely not how you create a safe working environment. IJzeren Jan (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll first say that Interlingue was first added to CFI in 2005, by a user that unfortunately has since passed away. I can't find the original discussion, but it may have just been added when the project was nascent and there weren't nearly as many procedures in place. As such, it was not just added in 2020 before the Interlingue vote. The vote in 2020 only changed the CFI for conlangs in the Appendix as the vote stated, so I'd like to correct the record on that part.
 * I'd sincerely hesitate before calling it an unsafe working environment for the reason of the deletion of translations (I can think of plenty of harassment/discrimination-related reasons that create that environment). I understand that you work very closely with Volapük and are rightly worried about deletion of material, but seeing as though only the translations would be deleted, I want us to avoid a doomsday mass deletion sort of thought process as that will cause me to pull away from the discussion.
 * Policies change, and like I said this project works on consensus. If 7 more people voted oppose in the above vote to delete Interlingue, then it would not have passed. I've argued very strongly for and against certain policies that didn't go my way, but regardless I see it necessary to continue working on what's important to me in the end. Votes like those only rely on how strongly one side can convince the other, and at this point I'm still not putting up the vote until I get more clarification/consensus on certain issues either way. AG202 (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, here I beg to differ. Even if with regard to Interlingue the 2020 vote was just a confirmation of the status quo, that doesn't change the fact that it was official policy. Nor that, practically from the beginning the text, on the Main Page ("a free multilingual dictionary in every language", later: "It aims to describe all words of all languages") has been an open invitation to contribute in Interlingue as well. With "unsafe working environment" I do, of course, not mean death threats or sexual harassment, but the risk that a sudden change in policy might easily cause the annihilation of many weeks or months work by several volunteers. It would have been a different story if certain languages had been excluded from the beginning, or even before any substantial work had been done on them. But changing the rules during the game, that's just not cricket. IJzeren Jan (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree that it's disorienting for all the translations to be removed, and that's something I'll push for more discussion about. However, as an aside, posts like this one that misrepresent the proposal sincerely make me not want to interact with the author in the future. It misrepresented @Koavf's point of view (they do not want Esperanto removed from the mainspace and the discussion was already resolved beforehand) and misstates the urgency of the proposal (it still has not been put up officially at all!). I'm honestly a bit disappointed, considering how much effort I'm putting in to reply to these comments in the first place, when with other votes I've seen, authors don't even reply to a single one of these :-/ AG202 (talk) 15:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @AG202 I also appreciate the civil tone. However, I don't think many have given thought to how much of a panic it creates when even a single user or small group of users starts talking about deleting content or closing projects. To name a few over the past years and currently:
 * The Interlingue Wikibooks was closed down when I had a few years where I was unable to devote any time to the language. When I came back I had a whole book I intended to write, and I did on the English Wikibooks - a full 100 chapters long.
 * The Interlingue entries mentioned here that were deleted (weeks of my time gone in an instant)
 * Two nominations for deletion of the Volapük and Novial Wikipedias
 * Novial before that.
 * All of those went by without my knowledge and I certainly would have liked to see a post on /r/auxlangs about it.
 * As for the user's comment: I don't know how else you would interpret the comment "I think there should be an option to relegate all constructed languages to the appendix namespace, including Esperanto." - even if the user is leaning towards including it. Plus the link on /r/auxlangs goes directly to this page where the entire discussion is kept.
 * In addition, the page for the proposal has the following: "they are the only languages with a strong community consensus for inclusion currently." Note the word *currently*. A while back the "current" consensus included Novial, then it didn't. Then the current consensus removed Interlingue. This page is now deeming the "current" consensus to include Esperanto. How does that look as an Esperantist (I'm not, but many others are) to see the bar drawn up so high and musing about further restrictions?
 * Re: misstating the urgency of the proposal: sure, but when a proposal goes up for a vote it is decided in the space of a month, as @IJzeren Jan noted. Nobody in the Interlingue community ever heard about it, nobody came by the Interlingue Wikipedia to mention it. It's not surprising that the people who actually knew about the discussion were the ones that voted for it, while nobody else had any idea what was going on. Interlingue has a huge amount of content going back to the 1920s and all of the words could have been attested using these resources if anyone had known. Cosmoglotta alone has over 300 issues. We could have *easily* attested each and every word tenfold - if we had only known. I hope people understand that.
 * As for the "why the mainspace for Volapük when other auxlangs don't have it" - yes, this is always going to happen when things are taken away piecemeal like this. But there should probably be some thought as to whether the original decision was correct, rather than rushing to line things up so that all translations for auxlangs from words in mainspace languages are equally deleted. Mithridates (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * One more thing to add: please take a look at @IJzeren Jan's proposal that constructed languages be mainspace languages as long as they have an ISO code and a Wikipedia. It's a concrete standard that can put an end to these endless discussions trying to determine whether a language belongs or not. Then the users of these languages can get back to work without the constant apprehension that exists today. It's also fairer to the users who are forced to try to determine whether an auxlang is living or not without any experience in the matter. And it still leaves room to eliminate any words that aren't sufficiently attested, so there is no danger of Wiktionary being flooded with random word that may or may not be correct. Mithridates (talk) 17:39, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mithridates: Re: reddit post: If this is your post, you deliberately mis-titled it. "one user on the talk page would like to remove Esperanto as well" is blatantly false, and by the time this post was posted, it was already made clear that I rejected the removal of Esperanto and current consensus is more than for its inclusion. It reads to me as a call for Esperantists to respond with expected anger towards an issue that's not even going on, which to me is not okay at all. I understand the urgency, but urgency does not mean that disinformation should be spread.
 * As for the rest, note that I am not rushing, otherwise I would have set the vote up and not responded to any comments here. Also, these discussions have been going on for 6 years now. And again, no Interlingue entries were deleted to my knowledge. Translations were, yes, but those do not require nearly the same amount of effort, coming from someone who's add many in my time here. And yes, consensus does change over time, but that's how any project works.
 * Re: using Wikipedias/ISO codes: As I said already, we do not rely on other projects for our own criteria. This should be made abundantly clear by the current vote on personal attacks failing, along with no references mentioning Wikipedia's guidelines in our WT:CFI. In fact, we explicitly exclude cites from other Wikimedia projects counting towards WT:ATTEST for this reason. It's so much harder to delete a Wikipedia ushered in pre-LangCom, especially for conlangs due to the passionate (and honestly brigaded) debate on them. This is not something that I'm going to include in a proposal as I know that it would fail and I would not support it myself. AG202 (talk) 17:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @AG202 I simply don't know how else one is supposed to read "Option to exclude all constructed languages" and "I think there should be an option to relegate all constructed languages to the appendix namespace, including Esperanto". But sure, here it is resubmitted.
 * > we do not rely on other projects for our own criteria
 * Maybe this will sound incredibly naive, but perhaps you should for this case? It is clearly taking up oodles of time and discussion and the wording is always vague. Every page is full of "generally", "community consensus", "currently", and other terms showing a clear effort towards clarity without achieving it:
 * > Generally, constructed languages that have amassed a critical mass of native speakers
 * > it's been brought up how our current CFI for mainspace constructed languages is vague and misleading. We limit languages like Toki Pona to the Appendix, but allow Volapük with a significantly smaller userbase in the mainspace. This vote hopes to alleviate that issue by limiting mainspace constructed languages to Esperanto and Eskayan, as they are the only languages with a strong community consensus for inclusion currently.
 * And this:
 * > It also gives us a direct rationale to point to versus the "this is how it's been"
 * But the answer "we do not rely on other projects for our own criteria" is itself a "this is how it's been", is it not?
 * Maybe this isn't possible, but from my point of view there is one way to do it that can be explained in a just a few words and doesn't need to be relitigated again and again.
 * I'm starting to repeat the same points so I guess I'll just leave it at this. Best, Mithridates (talk) 18:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the resubmission, thank you. The reason I use words like "generally", "currently", and the like is because this is what the project tends to agree upon. It is extraordinarily difficult here to get approval for anything, let alone such a contentious topic like this one, and very very specific proposals tend to fail unless there's universal approval ahead of time. Not that extremely vague ones are better either, which is why I tried to find a balance. Finally, there is close to 0 appetite for relying on other projects, unfortunately, and it would require such a stark culture change. AG202 (talk) 19:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @AG202 Interesting bit about the culture change, thanks. I noticed that you consider it unfortunate, and I presume that it won't sit well with many others to remove the rest of the constructed languages. (And removing the translations does count as deletions, despite it being relatively less work to add them - I don't think it's right to try to make it look like this isn't actually deleting content)
 * In light of that, I would advise taking what I'd call a 'moral' stand, for lack of a better term. No removing translations for constructed languages just because the ones for Novial and Interlingue have already been removed in order to make it look like the system for deciding inclusion is working well - given the massive volume of discussions on what should belong, it's clearly not. This will show that Wiktionary is unable to decide criteria for inclusion by itself, and that it has done very little to engage with the languages that it has already deleted translations for. (e.g. not once has anyone from Wiktionary ever showed up to ask Interlingue to add sources for its words, which it could have easily done)
 * I think this will result in a bit more soul-searching that may lead to something deeper and more comprehensive than just shoveling non-Esperanto auxlangs into the appendix and hoping that it will solve the problem. It won't resolve the issue either as Interslavic is continuing to grow and it is very likely that the users here will have to confront that and come to yet another consensus about what is viable or not. "Native speakers? Activity? Written content? If we are going to add Interslavic, what about so-and-so other auxlang that seems a lot more active than last time we looked at it...?" and so on. The discussions will just continue in the same manner. And probably worsened by the fact that the average English Wiktionary user is probably not able to ascertain just how active Interslavic is, because it is not one of the Romance auxlangs that are relatively easy to parse. e.g. a non-slavic speaker won't be able to tell whether the language being used is actually Interslavic or just Slavic language speakers talking *about* the language.
 * That's my advice, anyway. Aim for a long-term culture change instead of a bit of cleanup and hoping for the best. Mithridates (talk) 03:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I am certainly not saying that having LangCom decide is the ideal solution (although I wouldn't call it "another project"), but it is better than building a policy around something like "we want it to be such that language X is included but languages Y and Z are excluded" or "language A has to go because we don't want language B". It is poor Volapük's fault that Toki Pona and Interslavic are popular nowadays?
 * Any policy should be based on objective criteria and not on the desired outcome. Native speakers are indeed a possibility, but like I wrote above, in the case of auxlangs is really of questionable value. I think there are better options. For example: the language must have an ISO 639-1 code; that way, you'd keep five languages (Esperanto, Volapük, Interlingua, Ido and Interlingue) and exclude all others, including Novial, Lojban, Toki Pona and Interslavic. Or: the language must have a corpus of at least X words in durably archived texts. Or: the language must have (had) a user community of at least X people. Whatever. IJzeren Jan (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * "The language must have an ISO 639-1 code": This could be workable but would require more input from the rest of the community.
 * "The language must have a corpus of at least X words in durably archived texts.": Not reasonable to maintain.
 * "The language must have (had) a user community of at least X people": This is the same thing as the native speaker issue, if not worse, and would be up to how many people use the Toki Pona discord for example. AG202 (talk) 19:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Reddit is such trash. I'm glad one person at least actually quoted one of the comments I made. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I strongly agree with a lot of what Jan says, and think the rationales that have been given against most of our mainspace constructed languages are flimsy. The constructed languages we currently have in the mainspace are by and large those that have had substantial bodies of CFI-satisfying literature published in them; they are precisely those languages which we probably could treat as WDLs and not lose most of their entries. To my mind, this criterion much better matches the status quo of community practice up to this point, and is also more in keeping with our broader inclusion criteria as a whole, than the proposed changes. The requirement for native speakers, by contrast, raises a whole host of questions and problems. (Were there ever native speakers of Old Church Slavonic, for instance? By many definitions of OCS, the answer is no.) If we want to revise and clarify our inclusion criteria for mainspace constructed languages, I do not think the ones proposed in this vote are the way to go about it. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 00:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * OCS isn’t under the purview of this vote, as it’s not a constructed language. Otherwise it’d be in the Appendix right now. Again, this vote aligns with a majority of folks who’ve participated in these discussions in the past. If this vote fails in the end, so be it, but there’s a clear want for it. AG202 (talk) 00:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * What makes you think that OCS is not a constructed language? Several prominent Slavists would disagree with that point of view. In any case, it fulfils every part of the definition of a constructed language: we know by whom it was created, when it was created, who commissioned it, for what purpose it was created, and which languages it was based on. In addition, it never had native speakers, it served as a written language long before it was ever spoken, and Sts. Cyril and Method even invented an alphabet for it. At the very best, it belongs to a grey zone between natural and constructed languages. IJzeren Jan (talk) 17:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * As mentioned in the BP discussion, standardized/koine versions of a language are not considered artificial languages or constructed languages by our definitions, nor by the definition used by Wikipedia. Otherwise, Swahili, standard Yoruba, Unified Kichwa, etc. etc. would not be in the mainspace. This has been established precedent since the beginning of this website. CC: @Benwing2, @-sche AG202 (talk) 17:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * That sounds reasonable, but in that case maybe that should be clarified in the CFI text: "Constructed languages have not developed naturally, but are the product of conscious effort in the fulfillment of some purpose" doesn't clearly exclude standardized forms of existing languages.--Urszag (talk) 09:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'd appreciate any suggestions for how to reword that text. AG202 (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll also mention this comment from User:Thadh:
 * When we record languages like Latin or Old Church Slavonic, we don't simply record the written language, but we simultaneously record the spoken language associated with it: Vulgar Latin and Pre-Bulgaro-Macedonian. For auxlangs, you don't have a natural counterpart that is recorded together with the written one.
 * From AG202 (talk) 15:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Just noting here that I also intend to oppose this vote as it stands. I simply don't understand why Wiktionarians have traditionally had such a strong prejudice against constructed languages. I feel that it would be useful for a user who has been active on this project for a long time to write down a good rationale for this vote. The arguments made by AG202 above are mainly appeals to Wiktionary policy and community practice, which are valuable in an RFV/RFD discussion, but are not especially enlightening when the fundamental question is why these policies and practices have developed this way. This, that and the other (talk) 11:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @This, that and the other: I'm not sure why the policies developed in this way, but as recently mentioned, the languages have been there close to the inception of CFI, so if anything it feels like they've been maintained for precedent's sake. However, part of the reason why this proposal was created was that we keep getting BP threads about Interslavic and other conlangs and why they're relegated to the Appendix namespace while conlangs like Volapük remain in the mainspace. Proposal 1 at least gives us some criteria that we can actually point to, versus the "this is how it's been" rationale that keeps being brought up. AG202 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe that any constructed language where a good chunk (at least 50%) of its lemmas have three independent uses can go into the mainspace, while any language that passes the WT:LDL criteria can go into the appendix. The three languages that AG202 points out as not having enough quotes in their entries could have a majority of their entries pass CFI, but no one's cared enough to do that. I'll put random entries from the languages into RFV, and see what happens. CitationsFreak (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * (Also, revivals of languages/language families should not be considered conlangs if they are used.) CitationsFreak (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * (Also, revivals of languages/language families should not be considered conlangs if they are used.) CitationsFreak (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Eskayan
I wonder, as far a proposal 1 is concerned, whether it is technically correct/demonstrable to say that Eskayan has "a critical mass of native speakers". (I also wonder whether people will vote against the vagueness of "critical mass", even though I understand that setting any specific number will also invite opposition, and we'll have problems with people claiming there's a native speaker of Volapuk whose religion is Jedi, see here, his self-reported census data says so, etc.) Eskayan has a community of speakers, an actual community of people who live together in villages and use it in their lives, and teach it to their children in schools, but it can unfortunately be debated whether this counts as making the child "native [from birth]" speakers, sensu stricto. If these proposals don't pass, I suspect it might be prudent to vote on just "add Eskayan to the list" (without that being bundled with removing anything). - -sche (discuss) 20:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

 * @-sche: Thanks, I'll likely make a separate vote for it. The only thing I'm hesitating about is whether or not it should be added to WT:WDL. AG202 (talk) 15:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


text:
penerapi

Etymology
From id.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: penerapi


text:
काछ

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) the end of a dhoti tucked in at the waist behind
 * 2)  shorts

title: काछ


text:
काछ्

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) edge, hem

title: काछ्


text: Category:Rhymes:Indonesian/ŋɪn/2 syllables


text: Shorwell

title: Shorwell


text: 𩀚

title: 𩀚


text:
bopis

Etymology
Said to be, although the original meaning of the word in its original language is now lost.

title: bopis


text:
peconha

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  a rope used to secure the feet for climbing branchless trees

title: peconha


text: peconhas

title: peconhas


text: higote

title: higote


text: 𦑶

title: 𦑶


text:
pocema

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  uproar, ruckus

title: pocema


text: pocemas

title: pocemas


text:
inginkan

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to want

title: inginkan


text: Category:Rhymes:Indonesian/inkan

title: Category:Rhymes:Indonesian/inkan


text: Category:Rhymes:Indonesian/inkan/3 syllables


text:
thermoballing

Noun

 * 1)  An incident where honeybees surround a threat and cause it to die through high temperature.

title: thermoballing


text: menginginkan

title: menginginkan


text: Category:Rhymes:Indonesian/inkan/4 syllables


text: 𩀛

title: 𩀛


text:
put up on

Verb

 * 1)  To make (someone) aware of or up-to-date on (something).
 * ''You gotta watch out for his loose lips, he'll put those guys up on you.
 * 1)  To make or keep (someone) current in knowledge, fashion or supply of (something).
 * ''His dad put him up on good music.

title: put up on


text: diinginkan

title: diinginkan


text: Citations:Durge

title: Citations:Durge


text: teringinkan

title: teringinkan


text:
ingini

Etymology
From.

title: ingini


text: akaunt

title: akaunt


text: mengingini

title: mengingini


text:
walk on by

Verb

 * 1)  To walk past (someone, something) without stopping or acknowledging them.
 * I said hello, but she walked on by.

title: walk on by


text: diingini

title: diingini


text:
remark on

Verb

 * 1)  To notice (something) and comment on it; to recognize that (something) is important or novel enough to comment on it.
 * He remarked on how good you are at the game.
 * Lots of people have this hairstyle back home, nobody would even remark on it.

title: remark on


text: remark upon

title: remark upon


text: cajás

title: cajás


text:
alaws

Etymology
From of.

title: alaws


text:
peringin

Etymology
From id.

Verb

 * 1)  to make or to cause to want

title: peringin


text: Category:Rhymes:Indonesian/ŋɪn/3 syllables


text: memperingin

title: memperingin


text: Category:Rhymes:Indonesian/ŋɪn/4 syllables


text:
from behind

Adverb

 * 1)  Engaged in the missionary position, usually anal sex.

title: from behind


text: diperingin

title: diperingin


text:
lus-benggala

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) Bengal light

title: lus-benggala


text:
luses na benggala

Etymology
.

title: luses na benggala


text:
Talk:benggala

Source
@Mar vin kaiser I'm currently slowing down with Wiktionary checking (trying a wikibreak) and a lot of IPs and users are coming in, but where did you get this? Ysrael214 (talk) 00:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Word found in Vicassan's dictionary. Defined as "pheasant" and "egg of a pheasant". --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 01:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:benggala


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Ryukyuan/idasi

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) to take out

Descendants

 * Northern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:
 * Southern Ryukyuan:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Ryukyuan/idasi


text:
go on by

Verb

 * 1)  To continue with normal business; to go about one's day; to ignore potential distractions and continue with the task at hand.

title: go on by


text: מאַזלדיק

title: מאַזלדיק


text:
過咗海就係神仙

Idiom

 * 1)  to not care about what happen afterwards once the target is reached

title: 過咗海就係神仙


text:
гарнітур

Etymology
. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) suit, lounge suit, business suit
 * 2) set, ensemble
 * 1) set, ensemble

title: гарнітур


text: jererês

title: jererês


text:
Talk:incomprehense

RFV discussion: April–May 2024
Just in Marston? Lots of Latin... P. Sovjunk (talk) 11:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

 * Yep, had a good look but found nothing. It probably doesn't even mean this anyway. This, that and the other (talk) 10:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 06:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:incomprehense


text:
Talk:don't fuck in the factory

RFV discussion: May 2023–January 2024
This seems to be exactly like (except spicier): an English idiom only ever used by Germans, and consequently, only appearing as mentions in German texts. Not sure what to make of it. This, that and the other (talk) 10:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

 * It indeed only seems to be attested in German, so I've changed the L2 header to German and added the only three cites I could find. RFV-failed as English but RFV-passed as German? But absolutely no objection if someone wants to RFD it as not being a real or common proverb/idiom (we are not Wikiquote, to record every phrase that's in three books). - -sche (discuss) 03:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Another variation I've heard used in German is "never/don't fuck the company" (do they correspond to English idioms?) Jberkel 18:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:don't fuck in the factory


text:
Talk:niggerization

RFV discussion: March 2024
Sense 2: "The act or process of being exposed or subjected to black people or their influence." Corresponds to the intransitive verb, which I also RFV above. Equinox ◑ 08:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

 * cited Kiwima (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

 * The definition needs cleanup (is it really "process of being exposed [...] to black people", or is it rather "the act or process of exposing to black influence", or some better wording like "the act of making more black"?). But the underlying thing which this definition appears to have been attempting to cover does seem to exist; beyond Kiwima's cites, I added one to the citations page where it's translating Nazi German Verniggerung. It's possible there are also enough cites to split sense 1 into ~"the act/process of reducing/dehumanizing black people to niggers" and ~"the act of treating (someone non-black) the way niggers are treated". - -sche (discuss) 00:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Passes, IMO, with a slightly emended definition. - -sche (discuss) 02:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:niggerization


text:
Talk:infausting

RFV discussion: April–May 2024
Nonce word P. Sovjunk (talk) 12:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I found a verb form (compare ), but no noun uses besides Bacon. RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 06:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:infausting


text:
barberstore

Etymology
.

title: barberstore


text:
headbutt with

Etymology
From butt heads with

Verb

 * 1)  To argue with (someone) or repeatedly get into conflict with (someone).
 * She's been headbutting with him since they first met.

title: headbutt with


text: barberstores

title: barberstores


text:
Talk:ov

Let's Make "Ov" A Recognized Spelling Variant Ov "Of"!
I think "ov" makes more sense than "of", so I believe we should take the first step to replacing it, which is getting it recognized as a (valid) alternative to "of".

I have created a petition on Change.Org to get "ov" recognized and, eventually, put in a dictionary. 2600:381:CBA0:3FAC:8DC7:B455:C459:DFE3 01:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:ov


text: Category:ha:Female people

title: Category:ha:Female people


text:
lura'

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) saliva

title: lura'


text:
cheese out

Verb

 * 1)  To make (something) cheesy (overdramatic, trite); to make (something) less cool, especially by making it more mainstream.
 * 2)  To be smiling or laughing excessively or remarkably, usually as a result of smoking cannabis.
 * 3)  To chicken out; to lose one's nerve and therefore not participate in something.

title: cheese out


text:
Talk:Epinosis

Syn. of Enosis
Non concludive evidence that this is a synonym of. DCDuring (talk) 01:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Epinosis


text:
盒仔餅

Noun

 * 1)   placed in a giftbox

title: 盒仔餅


text: 盒仔饼

title: 盒仔饼


text:
zoom by

Verb

 * 1)  To go by too quickly.
 * Our time together has zoomed by.

title: zoom by


text:
Talk:earthrise

RFV discussion: December 2023–March 2024
RFV all senses. A westman (talk) 14:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

 * It's possible to cite the words (Citations:earthrise), but the definitions need to be cleaned up to better expressed what they're actually used to refer to (not the time of day, AFAICT, but the phenomenon of rise, which is turn is due to the observer moving relative to the horizon, or else to librations). - -sche (discuss) 15:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

 * Cited with changed definitions. - -sche (discuss) 00:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

 * Passed with the changed definitions. - -sche (discuss) 15:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:earthrise


text:
Talk:snowdragon

RFV discussion: December 2023–June 2024
— S URJECTION / T / C / L / 22:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

 * It has quotations as of now. A W estman  talk   stalk  23:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Cited. J3133 (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

 * Passed Denazz (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:snowdragon


text:
Talk:gullage

RFV discussion: December 2023–June 2024
Jonson only? Denazz (talk) 20:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

 * Had a quick peek and couldn't find anything else (though I found a surname, now added!). Equinox ◑ 20:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

 * RFV failed Denazz (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:gullage


text:
Talk:bullet train

RFV discussion: December 2023–February 2024
Rfv-sense Suicide by small firearm.

I've never heard this, and the only thing I can find from a quick search is a bit of a wordplay in this book which is clearly using it to refer to getting shot in battle, but (a) that doesn't fit, and (b) it seems like a creative one-off. Theknightwho (talk) 23:33, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

RFV failed. Theknightwho (talk) 18:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

 * Agreed. Even if it was real, it would have to be: "take the bullet train" - "commit suicide". Nyuhn (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:bullet train


text:
Talk:earthset

RFV discussion: December 2023–March 2024

 * See Talk:earthrise.

title: Talk:earthset


text:
紅綵

Noun

 * 1)  red cloth used to symbolize a festive occasion

title: 紅綵


text:
maglura'

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to spit

title: maglura'


text: 红彩

title: 红彩


text:
安靈

Verb

 * 1) to find a suitable place for the spirit tablet

title: 安靈


text:
徛靈

Verb

 * 1)  to find a suitable place for the spirit tablet

title: 徛靈


text: 徛灵

title: 徛灵


text: 安灵

title: 安灵


text: zipper up

title: zipper up


text: zipper down

title: zipper down


text:
Talk:boodle fight

Pronunciation
Isn't it pronounced "budol"? To me, I hear it as "budol" and not "budel". Mar vin kaiser (talk) 01:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 * @Mar vin kaiser For me, it's a schwa so any is valid. Like traysikel and nudels, traysikol or nudols sometimes especially in Visayan. 𝄽 ysrael214 (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I think what goes is for Tagalog speakers that don't use the schwa sound, whether they say this with an /o/ or an /e/ sound. Because the sound can go either way, in my opinion, like the word "penis" would be "pi-nis", but "lettuce" would be "le-tus", even though the words have the same ending in American English. So I wanna know which one native Tagalog speakers (that don't speak English) say. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mar vin kaiser Hmm. apple is apol, portable may be portabol not portabel then again popsicle is papsikel, tricycle is traysikel
 * KWF dictionary has pronunciations for dle endings seem to be del, like hurdle = herdel but cable is keybol not keybel, so yea waiting for mlgc 𝄽 ysrael214 (talk) 02:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * When you said that "hurdle" was shown as "herdel", I also checked "noodle" being "nudel", "handle" being "handel", and "doodle" being "dudel". So it could make sense that "boodle" is pronounced as "budel", but based on experience, I kinda think that native speakers say "budol", but I'm not 100% sure. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 02:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mar vin kaiser I agree though that some do say "budol payt" 𝄽 ysrael214 (talk) 02:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mar vin kaiser @Ysrael214 I hear "budel", but maybe once in a while, there's someone who'll say it like "budol" but it might be prone to be mistaken with if so, tho both seems to have at least website attestation, but from my end, google books attestation is only available for "budol payt". Is this a discussion tho about the Pronunciation section? If so, I don't mind if both pronunciations are there or how many else other people say it like. Mlgc1998 (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you guys hear "budel payt"? For me, I only hear "budol payt", and considering that searching Google for "budol payt" shows so many hits, while "budel payt" shows nothing, kinda tells me that Pinoys think of this word as pronounced as "budol" instead of "budel". What do you think? --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 04:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mar vin kaiser I really hear both depending on speaker. 𝄽 ysrael214 (talk) 05:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mar vin kaiser yeah, I hear "budel payt", people trying to say "boodle fight" in Taglish in their accent. There are "budel payt" results coming up on my Google All Search and Google Video Search, just not Google News and Google Books, but there's no results for "budol payt" as well on my Google News and just one on Google Books search on my end. Mlgc1998 (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mar vin kaiser @Mlgc1998 I found this one:
 * https://youtu.be/vdhEEmF1sCo?t=490 𝄽 ysrael214 (talk) 15:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:boodle fight


text:
majuni

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  mixture of opium, sugar and other ingredients

title: majuni


text:
worshipfull

Adjective

 * 1) * 1472, The Coventry Leet Book: Or Mayor's Register, sxn 57, "Joh. Thrumpton Mayor"
 * the wheche old men all & euerych of hem by hym self deposed & swar openly vppon a boke in the presence of the forseid worshipfull men, all the grownde betwen Whitley broke & Barons ffeld of Couentre, that lyeth betwen the kynges hye waye ledyng from Whitley to Couentre on the one syde, and the kynges Parke on the toder syde, to be Comen to the Comeners of this Citee of Couentree;
 * the wheche old men all & euerych of hem by hym self deposed & swar openly vppon a boke in the presence of the forseid worshipfull men, all the grownde betwen Whitley broke & Barons ffeld of Couentre, that lyeth betwen the kynges hye waye ledyng from Whitley to Couentre on the one syde, and the kynges Parke on the toder syde, to be Comen to the Comeners of this Citee of Couentree;

title: worshipfull


text: Category:Swahili terms derived from the Arabic root ع ج ن


text:
竊一

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-one; 71

title: 竊一


text: 窃一

title: 窃一


text:
竊二

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-two; 72

title: 竊二


text: 窃二

title: 窃二


text: pleasantnesse

title: pleasantnesse


text:
muvaqqat

Etymology
. Cognates with 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) temporary

title: muvaqqat


text:
goudut

Adjective

 * 1) liar

title: goudut


text:
constitutional silver

Noun

 * 1)  Silver American quarters, dimes, and half dollars, minted prior to 1965.

title: constitutional silver


text:
omonat

Etymology
. Cognates with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) deposit, charge
 * 2) in trust

title: omonat


text:
Kügelein

Etymology
From.

title: Kügelein


text:
Gumas

Noun

 * 1) October

title: Gumas


text: posteritie

title: posteritie


text:
竊三

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-three; 73

title: 竊三


text: 窃三

title: 窃三


text:
Diarsia brunnea

Etymology
🇰🇲

Hypernyms

 * ; - suborder;  - infraorder;  - division;  - section;  - subsection;  - superfamily;  - family;  - subfamily;  - tribe;  - subtribe;  - genus

Hyponyms

 * , - subspecies

title: Diarsia brunnea


text:
iman-imanon

Noun

 * 1) ambition

title: iman-imanon


text:
竊四

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-four; 74

title: 竊四


text: 窃四

title: 窃四


text: nobilitie

title: nobilitie


text:
竊五

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-five; 75

title: 竊五


text: 窃五

title: 窃五


text: unnaturall

title: unnaturall


text:
竊六

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-six; 76

title: 竊六


text: 窃六

title: 窃六


text:
竊七

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-seven; 77

title: 竊七


text: 窃七

title: 窃七


text:
竊八

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-eight; 78

title: 竊八


text: 窃八

title: 窃八


text: Arthoniales

title: Arthoniales


text:
竊九

Numeral

 * 1)  seventy-seven; 79

title: 竊九


text: 窃九

title: 窃九


text: godlinesse

title: godlinesse


text: righteousnesse

title: righteousnesse


text:
Swanepoel

Etymology
From.

title: Swanepoel


text:
Micrurus peruvianus

Etymology
🇰🇲

title: Micrurus peruvianus


text: Category:mul:Elapid snakes

title: Category:mul:Elapid snakes


text: Category:mul:Peru

title: Category:mul:Peru


text:
metbugat

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) press

title: metbugat


text:
रोहित्

Etymology
Derived from, from. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬, both inherited from different Old Indo-Aryan words for reddish-brown deer derived from the same root.

Noun

 * 1) a reddish or a ruddy doe
 * 2) a reddish mare
 * 1) a reddish mare
 * 1) a reddish mare

Adjective

 * 1) red, dark red, ruddy

title: रोहित्


text:
مەتبۇئات

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) press

title: مەتبۇئات


text: Carabinae

title: Carabinae


text: Citations:Cullavellan

title: Citations:Cullavellan


text:
प्रापयति

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to cause to be obtained

title: प्रापयति


text:
Diurideae

Hyponyms

 * ,, , , , , , , - tribes

title: Diurideae


text:
ઓઢવાનું

Noun

 * 1) blanket
 * 2) covering

title: ઓઢવાનું


text:
Cullavellan

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1)  The  of Cullen Rutherford and the female elf Inquistor player character from .

title: Cullavellan


text: arrogancie

title: arrogancie


text:
Rosa subg. Rosa

Etymology
.

title: Rosa subg. Rosa


text: Category:mul:Roses

title: Category:mul:Roses


text:
insanangai

Verb

 * 1) to fix

title: insanangai


text: Category:mul:Rose family plants

title: Category:mul:Rose family plants


text: Citations:Fenhawke

title: Citations:Fenhawke


text:
ફાંદો

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * 1)  beer belly

title: ફાંદો


text:
dafina

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  hidden treasure

title: dafina


text: Category:Swahili terms derived from the Arabic root د ف ن


text: Spirostreptidae

title: Spirostreptidae


text: Category:mul:Myriapods

title: Category:mul:Myriapods


text:
Fenhawke

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1)  The  of  and player character  from .

title: Fenhawke


text: Citations:Handers

title: Citations:Handers


text:
Handers

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1)  The  of  and player character  from .

title: Handers


text: Myophiuroidea

title: Myophiuroidea


text:
पालुङ्गो

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) spinach

title: पालुङ्गो


text:
Talk:tối hậu thông điệp

RFV discussion: August 2023–May 2024
Vietnamese. Google Books has one relevant example of this actually being used in a Vietnamese, not a dictionary or some straightforward translation of Chinese texts (although this one, as a work about history, obviously used various sources). I've found no other attestations that are actually useful. PhanAnh123 (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

 * This should go to RfV. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Move from RfD. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 02:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. Ultimateria (talk) 16:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:tối hậu thông điệp


text: Citations:Fenders

title: Citations:Fenders


text:
ପାଳଙ୍ଗ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) spinach

title: ପାଳଙ୍ଗ


text: Lithosiina

title: Lithosiina


text:
बैगुन

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) eggplant, aubergine

title: बैगुन


text:
جەسەت

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) corpse

title: جەسەت


text:
Tectipleura

Hyponyms

 * ,, , , , , - superorders
 * ,, , , , - order not assigned to superorders

title: Tectipleura


text: Othonninae

title: Othonninae


text:
jeset

Noun

 * 1) corpse, dead body

title: jeset


text:
see-through fence

Noun

 * 1)  chainlink fence
 * 1)  chainlink fence

title: see-through fence


text: Homalotini

title: Homalotini


text:
intob

Verb

 * 1) to count

title: intob


text:
meýit

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) corpse, dead body

title: meýit


text:
mayyit

Etymology
. Cognates with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) corpse

title: mayyit


text:
kaantob

Verb

 * 1) to block

title: kaantob


text:
kandawai

Noun

 * 1) stork

title: kandawai


text: Phrynetini

title: Phrynetini


text: Category:srn:Post

title: Category:srn:Post


text:
kaganaan

Noun

 * 1) field

title: kaganaan


text:
kapansalan

Noun

 * 1) importance

title: kapansalan


text:
meyyit

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) dead

title: meyyit


text:
biifi

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) letter written message

title: biifi


text:
mwanasayansi wa kompyuta

Noun

 * 1) computer scientist

title: mwanasayansi wa kompyuta


text: wanasayansi wa kompyuta

title: wanasayansi wa kompyuta


title: Template:R:grc:Rosol:2010


text:
meýil

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) will
 * 2) intention, plan

title: meýil


text: Category:ko:Polygons

title: Category:ko:Polygons


text:
चिकनाहट

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) oiliness, fattiness, slipperiness
 * 2) a substance causing such
 * 3) smoothness, polish

title: चिकनाहट


title: Template:R:grc:Mahlich:2022


text: Empidoidea

title: Empidoidea


text: Saperdini

title: Saperdini


text:
karalano

Noun

 * 1) process

title: karalano


text:
via-satellite

Adjective

 * 1)  satellite-fed foreign shows delayed by several minutes or hours in contrast to live television broadcasts

title: via-satellite


text:
karaatan

Verb

 * 1) to be hated

title: karaatan


text:
鯨海

Proper noun

 * 1) the ancient name of Sea of Japan

Noun

 * 1) sea, big sea

Synonyms

 * 1) (Sea of Japan) 鯨川之海

title: 鯨海


text: Steninae

title: Steninae


text:
oinsok

Adjective

 * 1) resentful

title: oinsok


text: Category:djk:Post

title: Category:djk:Post


text:
卌四

Numeral

 * 1) forty-four; 44

title: 卌四


text:
卌五

Numeral

 * 1) forty-five; 45

title: 卌五


text:
卌六

Numeral

 * 1) forty-six; 46

title: 卌六


text: Staphylininae

title: Staphylininae


text:
dumbocracy

Etymology
or. First use appears c. 1869.

Noun

 * 1)  A democracy, particularly an ineffective or dysfunctional one.

title: dumbocracy


text: Category:ko:Polyhedra

title: Category:ko:Polyhedra


text:
Arctiini

Hyponyms

 * ,, , , , , , - subtribes

title: Arctiini


text: Template:R:grc:Bernal-Black Athena

title: Template:R:grc:Bernal-Black Athena


text:
möhlet

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) term
 * 2) period

title: möhlet


text:
مۆھلەت

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) period

title: مۆھلەت


text:
center island

Noun

 * 1)  a barrier or structure on the median strip dividing opposing lanes of a road

title: center island


text:
möhüm

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) important, necessary

title: möhüm


text:
möwsüm

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) season

title: möwsüm


text: Scutocoxifera

title: Scutocoxifera


text: Category:mul:Isopods

title: Category:mul:Isopods


text: Template:R:grc:Bernal-Black Athena Writes Back


text: dumbocracies

title: dumbocracies


text:
さもん

Noun

 * 1)  ripples

title: さもん


text: Category:Rhymes:Indonesian/au̯/1 syllable


text: Category:zh:Polygons

title: Category:zh:Polygons


text: Category:ja:Polygons

title: Category:ja:Polygons


text:
maliýe

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) finance

title: maliýe


text:
moliya

Etymology
. Cognates with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) finance

title: moliya


text:
七……八……

Adverb

 * 1)  wildly; in an uncontrolled way; without order or reason; at random; haphazardly; having no direction or coherence

title: 七……八……


text:
七旬

Noun

 * 1)  Buddhist or Taoist rituals performed every seven days after a person's death until the 49th day

title: 七旬


text:
magaryf

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) enlightenment, education
 * 2) printers

title: magaryf


text:
砂紋

Noun

 * 1) ripples

title: 砂紋


text:
кэтэгэч

Etymology
From

Verb

 * 1) to swell

title: кэтэгэч


text:
кэтэльэй

Etymology
From

Verb

 * 1) to swell
 * 2) to bloat

title: кэтэльэй


text:
кэтэльуу

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1) tumor

title: кэтэльуу


text:
garnyras

Etymology
. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) side dish

Usage notes

 * This term is often mistranslated into English as "garnish", as garnyras does not refer to garnishes, such as green onions or chives on top of certain dishes, but rather vegetables or other foodstuffs accompanying a main (typically meat) dish.

title: garnyras


text: bubliks

title: bubliks


text:
bublik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A traditional Eastern European bread roll, consisting of a ring of yeast-leavened wheat dough that has been boiled in water for a short time before baking.

title: bublik


text:
кэтэмэл

Etymology
Borrowed from

Noun

 * 1) barren reindeer heifer

title: кэтэмэл


text:
кэтниилалимэ

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1) sledge for transporting things used at home

title: кэтниилалимэ


text:
ئىززەت

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) respect, honour
 * 2) pride, glory

title: ئىززەت


text:
кэтниимаҕил

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1) coat for home

title: кэтниимаҕил


text:
кэтниидугурчэ

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1) home shoes

title: кэтниидугурчэ


text:
yzzat

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) reverence, respect

title: yzzat


text: Category:nb:Fingers

title: Category:nb:Fingers


text: Category:nn:Fingers

title: Category:nn:Fingers


text: 胶剧

title: 胶剧


text:
кэвэч

Etymology
From

Verb

 * 1) to leave
 * 2) to match, correspond

title: кэвэч


text:
mãîa

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) mother

title: mãîa


text:
кэврэйм

Etymology
From

Verb

 * 1) to take away

title: кэврэйм


text:
кэвдьикуо

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1) fur coat for wearing on winter trips

title: кэвдьикуо


text:
кийуодьэҥ

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1) twins

title: кийуодьэҥ


text: Category:zh:Polyhedra

title: Category:zh:Polyhedra


text: Category:ja:Polyhedra

title: Category:ja:Polyhedra


text:
киилэ

Etymology
From

Adverb

 * 1) both
 * 2) together

title: киилэ


text: 专爱

title: 专爱


text: 手绘

title: 手绘


text:
кичим

Etymology
From

Verb

 * 1) to prohibit
 * 2) to teach

title: кичим


text: 莫财

title: 莫财


text: 语死早

title: 语死早


text:
還鄉團

Noun

 * 1)  homecoming legion; various Kuomintang-supported landlord militia aiming to regain their land lost during land reform

title: 還鄉團


text: 过咗海就系神仙

title: 过咗海就系神仙


text: 还乡团

title: 还乡团


text:
кичитэм

Etymology
From

Verb

 * 1) to limit

title: кичитэм


text:
totobon

Noun

 * 1) door

title: totobon


text:
tinaung

Noun

 * 1) lime

title: tinaung


text:
User talk:Purplebackpack89/ReBeerParlour

In general, I'm bothered by this, particularly that this could turn into a popularity contest. I also feel like my edits have been exaggerated by the OP and by Benwing, and a few things here need to be cleared up or pointed out:

 * 1) Indefs are generally only appropriate for vandalism or sockpuppetry and neither is behind alleged here.
 * 2) Starting an indef request when somebody feels harassed seems like a bad idea.  It can wait until the feeling of harassment dies down. Starting an indef request BECAUSE somebody feels harassed (and that is, in the main, PUC's comment) is a worse one.  Is that the message you want to be sending?  If people feel harassed, they should be allowed to say so.  Making an editor feel harassed and then suggested he be blocked for saying so seems like something out of some dystopian novel
 * 3) Purplebackpack89 IS CLEARLY HERE to build a Wiktionary, as he has created 636 entries
 * 4) A large portion of what is mentioned here is from 2014 and therefore isn't germane to 2024.   It's especially not germane because one of the diffs doesn't even explictly reference Purplebackpack89.  Literally part of this argument is "some guy left ten years ago...let's indef Purplebackpack89 now".  It's also ODD that the OP, who wasn't even here in 2014, seems so interested in it.
 * 5) A large portion of my edits have been scrutinized in a very short amount of time Taken literally years of work, some of which hadn't bothered anybody for years, and tried to change or delete a lot of it in just two weeks.
 * 6) Editors have given the appearance of assuming bad faith and focusing on the editor, not the content There have been several nominations or comments on the lines of "oh, well, this is a Purplebackpack89 edit".  That's not supposed to matter.
 * 7) Editors continued making the edits even though it was clearly bothering me.  Doesn't feel like good faith here.  No deadline...could just wait until I was less stressed out.
 * 8) Some of the attempts to modify Purplebackpack's edits ended up being questionable themselves For example, TheKnightWho bumbled into the "is a hot dog a sandwich?" controversy (enough people think it isn't that you can't say so in a dicdef).  Benwing nominated dont tread on me for deletion...and quickly five keep votes showed up against no agreement with his deletion proposal.  And that's not even touching on Denazz's trolling...
 * 9) Given those four things happening (#5-#8), basic psychology would suggest that Purplebackpack89 would be frustrated
 * 10) ...But there's no evidence of him breaking 3RR.  While Purplebackpack89 discusses and disputes some of the changes, he's hasn't broken 3RR
 * 11) ...and many of the changes have neither been discussed NOR touched by Purplebackpack89
 * 12) Many of the editors Purplebackpack89 has been dealing with have concerns expressed about their behavior by others Denazz is Wonderfool.  TheKnightWho has a long list of people taking issue with his battleground mentality.  Even Equinox frequently rubbed people the wrong way
 * 13) There is a pretty large incivility problem on this project and it's unfair to single out only Purplebackpack

 pbp 00:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


text:
potiukan

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) a kind of bee

title: potiukan


text: Citations:friendmance

title: Citations:friendmance


text:
oborulong

Adjective

 * 1) confuse

title: oborulong


text:
tintingabai

Noun

 * 1) pineapple

title: tintingabai


text:
munung

Noun

 * 1) lip

title: munung


text:
いたぶる

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to shake violently
 * 2)  to extort
 * 3) to toy with

title: いたぶる


text: 甚振る

title: 甚振る


text:
friendmance

Noun

 * 1)  A romance with a character with whom the player has a friendly relationship in .

Verb

 * 1)  To romance a character in this manner in .

title: friendmance


text:
User:Benwing2/fa-audio

 * fa: Page 407769 اردبیل:
 * fa: Page 78357 ارغوان:
 * fa: Page 77799 دانستن:
 * fa: Page 191077 اصفهان:
 * fa: Page 50783 تهران:
 * fa: Page 128651 شاهنامه:
 * fa: Page 81817 مشهد:
 * fa: Page 129653 آ:
 * fa: Page 49740 آب:
 * fa: Page 168730 آبادان:
 * fa: Page 82504 آبان:
 * fa: Page 199071 آباژور:
 * fa: Page 79873 آبتنی:
 * fa: Page 137640 آب‌راه:
 * fa: Page 115955 آبرو:
 * fa: Page 78725 آبشار:
 * fa: Page 78033 آبلیمو:
 * fa: Page 78719 آب میوه:
 * fa: Page 403600 آبنوس:
 * fa: Page 289271 آب‌گوشت:
 * fa: Page 184849 آبگینه:
 * fa: Page 77243 آبی:
 * fa: Page 142405 آتش‌بس:
 * fa: Page 82999 آتش‌فشان:
 * fa: Page 82405 آتن:
 * fa: Page 118886 آخ:
 * fa: Page 65244 آخر:
 * fa: Page 117188 آخور:
 * fa: Page 131274 آخوند:
 * fa: Page 81640 آدم برفی:
 * fa: Page 105294 آدم‌ها:
 * fa: Page 79275 آدم:
 * fa: Page 329889 آدمکش:
 * fa: Page 82505 آذر:
 * fa: Page 329506 آرش:
 * fa: Page 71076 آره:
 * fa: Page 142319 آری:
 * fa: Page 79273 آسمان:
 * fa: Page 77375 آش:
 * fa: Page 119942 آشنا:
 * fa: Page 96222 آفتاب:
 * fa: Page 77679 آقا:
 * fa: Page 77244 آلمان:
 * fa: Page 442140 آمد:
 * fa: Page 49689 آمدن:
 * fa: Page 79177 آن:
 * fa: Page 185493 آنان:
 * fa: Page 79521 آوردن
 * fa: Page 25251 ا:
 * fa: Page 77483 ابر:
 * fa: Page 78091 اتاق:
 * fa: Page 261413 اتحادیه اروپا:
 * fa: Page 68693 اجازه:
 * fa: Page 172061 ادبیات:
 * fa: Page 407769 اردبیل:
 * fa: Page 441791 از چه روی:
 * fa: Page 77467 اسب:
 * fa: Page 81148 است:
 * fa: Page 134362 استفاده:
 * fa: Page 82507 اسفند:
 * fa: Page 11076 اسم:
 * fa: Page 79802 اشک:
 * fa: Page 497393 اطلاع:
 * fa: Page 170839 اطلاعات:
 * fa: Page 507249 افزایش پیدا کردن:
 * fa: Page 507258 افزایش یافتن:
 * fa: Page 392831 افشین:
 * fa: Page 77203 افغانستان:
 * fa: Page 77997 امروز:
 * fa: Page 65231 انار:
 * fa: Page 232155 انفورماتیک:
 * fa: Page 79176 او:
 * fa: Page 593931 اولاد:
 * fa: Page 50660 ایران:
 * fa: Page 77254 ایرانی:
 * fa: Page 79170 ایشان:
 * fa: Page 49701 این:
 * fa: Page 25245 ب:
 * fa: Page 25245 ب:
 * fa: Page 129654 با:
 * fa: Page 77376 بابا:
 * fa: Page 77407 باد:
 * fa: Page 78204 بادام:
 * fa: Page 134563 بار:
 * fa: Page 77929 باران:
 * fa: Page 78407 باز:
 * fa: Page 53918 بازار:
 * fa: Page 77409 باغ:
 * fa: Page 428826 باغبان:
 * fa: Page 77406 بد:
 * fa: Page 77377 برادر:
 * fa: Page 441916 برای چه:
 * fa: Page 79872 بردن:
 * fa: Page 49980 برف:
 * fa: Page 77368 برنج:
 * fa: Page 79585 برگ:
 * fa: Page 131725 برگشتن:
 * fa: Page 79286 بز:
 * fa: Page 77362 بزرگ:
 * fa: Page 577859 بسته:
 * fa: Page 400288 بشقاب:
 * fa: Page 71075 بله:
 * fa: Page 78051 به:
 * fa: Page 77996 بهمن:
 * fa: Page 77552 بودن:
 * fa: Page 505782 بیت:
 * fa: Page 134501 بین‌المللی:
 * fa: Page 392493 بین المللی:
 * fa: Page 27501 ت:
 * fa: Page 98600 تاب:
 * fa: Page 77246 تابستان:
 * fa: Page 98599 تابع:
 * fa: Page 131474 تبر:
 * fa: Page 83688 تخته:
 * fa: Page 79045 ترس:
 * fa: Page 83577 تشکر:
 * fa: Page 73834 تمام:
 * fa: Page 96990 تند:
 * fa: Page 407214 تنفر:
 * fa: Page 68695 تنور:
 * fa: Page 77238 تو:
 * fa: Page 156843 توان:
 * fa: Page 156843 توان:
 * fa: Page 77230 توت:
 * fa: Page 81700 توپ:
 * fa: Page 60868 ث:
 * fa: Page 60869 ج:
 * fa: Page 79072 جانور:
 * fa: Page 132489 جبر:
 * fa: Page 188743 جلو:
 * fa: Page 138380 جمع:
 * fa: Page 137807 جوجه:
 * fa: Page 399167 حاضر:
 * fa: Page 79512 حوله:
 * fa: Page 285171 حکمت:
 * fa: Page 50983 خانه:
 * fa: Page 146794 خراب:
 * fa: Page 82502 خرداد:
 * fa: Page 648802 خریدار:
 * fa: Page 68650 خط:
 * fa: Page 69776 خواهر:
 * fa: Page 77907 خوب:
 * fa: Page 60871 د:
 * fa: Page 98854 داد:
 * fa: Page 49305 دادن:
 * fa: Page 541788 دارا:
 * fa: Page 442138 دارد:
 * fa: Page 442137 دارم:
 * fa: Page 78850 دارو:
 * fa: Page 386643 داس:
 * fa: Page 77989 داشتن:
 * fa: Page 78296 دامن:
 * fa: Page 77798 دانا:
 * fa: Page 77989 داشتن:
 * fa: Page 78981 دانشگاه:
 * fa: Page 115965 دانه:
 * fa: Page 77986 در:
 * fa: Page 77986 در:
 * fa: Page 78983 درخت:
 * fa: Page 115953 درس:
 * fa: Page 78069 دست:
 * fa: Page 134092 دستور زبان:
 * fa: Page 131525 دفتر:
 * fa: Page 78349 دندان:
 * fa: Page 77380 دهان:
 * fa: Page 506518 دوات:
 * fa: Page 132895 دود:
 * fa: Page 68641 دوست:
 * fa: Page 75073 دوشنبه:
 * fa: Page 78085 دوچرخه:
 * fa: Page 96994 دکان:
 * fa: Page 78010 دیوار:
 * fa: Page 17867 ر:
 * fa: Page 131513 رشته:
 * fa: Page 81848 رضا:
 * fa: Page 49690 رفتن:
 * fa: Page 67255 روز:
 * fa: Page 78216 روسری:
 * fa: Page 103933 روشن:
 * fa: Page 79503 ریختن:
 * fa: Page 178845 ریاضیات:
 * fa: Page 60873 ز:
 * fa: Page 9381 زبان:
 * fa: Page 79701 زلزله:
 * fa: Page 49822 زن:
 * fa: Page 48852 زیاد:
 * fa: Page 48852 زیاد:
 * fa: Page 60875 س:
 * fa: Page 442142 ساخت:
 * fa: Page 79909 ساختمان:
 * fa: Page 79908 ساختن:
 * fa: Page 96003 سبد:
 * fa: Page 77411 ستاره:
 * fa: Page 80881 سرد:
 * fa: Page 79625 سفره:
 * fa: Page 10248 سلام:
 * fa: Page 77402 سه:
 * fa: Page 79507 سوزن:
 * fa: Page 138581 سکوت:
 * fa: Page 70929 سگ:
 * fa: Page 58917 سیب:
 * fa: Page 60876 ش:
 * fa: Page 80088 شاخه:
 * fa: Page 77926 شب:
 * fa: Page 97041 شروع:
 * fa: Page 656701 شرکت کردن:
 * fa: Page 647813 شستشوی مغزی:
 * fa: Page 77966 شعر:
 * fa: Page 77237 شما:
 * fa: Page 75075 شنبه:
 * fa: Page 60877 ص:
 * fa: Page 78288 صابون:
 * fa: Page 83691 صحبت:
 * fa: Page 60878 ض:
 * fa: Page 419618 ضمنی:
 * fa: Page 60879 ط:
 * fa: Page 53497 طالب:
 * fa: Page 503826 طول موج:
 * fa: Page 60880 ع:
 * fa: Page 324514 عباسی:
 * fa: Page 166183 عدد صحیح:
 * fa: Page 188592 عدد:
 * fa: Page 67240 عشق:
 * fa: Page 119205 عصر:
 * fa: Page 77384 عمو:
 * fa: Page 60881 غ:
 * fa: Page 98138 غذا:
 * fa: Page 623726 غرش:
 * fa: Page 60884 ف:
 * fa: Page 312617 فاعل:
 * fa: Page 104840 فراموش:
 * fa: Page 78002 فردا:
 * fa: Page 78009 فرهنگ:
 * fa: Page 77363 فروختن:
 * fa: Page 83580 فصل:
 * fa: Page 166284 فقر:
 * fa: Page 60885 ق:
 * fa: Page 67391 قاشق:
 * fa: Page 22317 قاموس:
 * fa: Page 580200 قدرتمند:
 * fa: Page 78068 قله:
 * fa: Page 80688 قند:
 * fa: Page 78292 قول:
 * fa: Page 49226 کتاب:
 * fa: Page 49691 کردن:
 * fa: Page 60890 ل:
 * fa: Page 78984 لاله:
 * fa: Page 79712 لانه:
 * fa: Page 506133 لثه:
 * fa: Page 142607 لذت بردن:
 * fa: Page 137402 لذت:
 * fa: Page 60892 م:
 * fa: Page 77242 ما:
 * fa: Page 50040 مادر:
 * fa: Page 71103 مار:
 * fa: Page 77263 ماه:
 * fa: Page 81555 مثلث:
 * fa: Page 77677 مدرسه:
 * fa: Page 49850 مرد:
 * fa: Page 82503 مرداد:
 * fa: Page 329803 مزرعه:
 * fa: Page 159197 مسافرت:
 * fa: Page 559855 مصدق:
 * fa: Page 189610 معادله:
 * fa: Page 143670 معاصر:
 * fa: Page 78099 معلم:
 * fa: Page 81084 مغز:
 * fa: Page 172889 مفعول:
 * fa: Page 329827 مقدار:
 * fa: Page 21568 من:
 * fa: Page 77408 مهتاب:
 * fa: Page 134565 مهربان:
 * fa: Page 51499 موج:
 * fa: Page 96045 موفق:
 * fa: Page 74781 موقع:
 * fa: Page 79876 میخ:
 * fa: Page 78197 میز:
 * fa: Page 60893 ن:
 * fa: Page 319598 نادر:
 * fa: Page 11074 نام:
 * fa: Page 115964 نامه:
 * fa: Page 18344 نان:
 * fa: Page 77964 نانوا:
 * fa: Page 174374 نجوم:
 * fa: Page 530908 ندارد:
 * fa: Page 651385 ندارم:
 * fa: Page 68263 نمک:
 * fa: Page 82348 نوترون:
 * fa: Page 60870 ح:
 * fa: Page 60895 ه:
 * fa: Page 81260 هنر:
 * fa: Page 78258 هوا:
 * fa: Page 78835 هواپیما:
 * fa: Page 10224 و:
 * fa: Page 396292 وسط:
 * fa: Page 58066 پ:
 * fa: Page 325030 پایه:
 * fa: Page 77378 پدر:
 * fa: Page 641143 پس دادن:
 * fa: Page 78037 پسته:
 * fa: Page 49849 پسر:
 * fa: Page 79345 پشت:
 * fa: Page 333991 پشمین:
 * fa: Page 78728 پنج:
 * fa: Page 77830 پول:
 * fa: Page 442170 پینگ‌پونگ:
 * fa: Page 48925 چادر:
 * fa: Page 551711 چاه‌کور:
 * fa: Page 104854 چشمه:
 * fa: Page 78004 چوپان:
 * fa: Page 79082 ژاله:
 * fa: Page 131524 کاربر:
 * fa: Page 78087 کامپیوتر:
 * fa: Page 83102 کلمه:
 * fa: Page 79474 کمک کردن:
 * fa: Page 667321 کمیت:
 * fa: Page 432641 ݿ:
 * fa: Page 60888 گ:
 * fa: Page 284374 گردش:
 * fa: Page 67385 گرم:
 * fa: Page 245092 گفت:
 * fa: Page 77988 گفتن:
 * fa: Page 77482 گلدان:
 * fa: Page 134096 گندم:
 * fa: Page 118680 ترین:
 * fa: Page 79277 آئینه:
 * fa: Page 434103 آب معدنی:
 * fa: Page 77981 آب و هوا:
 * fa: Page 78699 آرام:
 * fa: Page 54977 آزاد:
 * fa: Page 77924 آسان:
 * fa: Page 279092 آفتابی:
 * fa: Page 72913 آلو:
 * fa: Page 599843 آماده کردن:
 * fa: Page 157999 آماده:
 * fa: Page 119202 آنجا:
 * fa: Page 79169 آن‌ها:
 * fa: Page 257957 آواز خواندن:
 * fa: Page 226582 آویختن:
 * fa: Page 78963 آپارتمان:
 * fa: Page 79383 آژانس:
 * fa: Page 8687 آیا:
 * fa: Page 79162 ارزان:
 * fa: Page 77412 از:
 * fa: Page 78302 انگور:
 * fa: Page 134571 ایمان:
 * fa: Page 79280 اینجا:
 * fa: Page 133423 باحال:
 * fa: Page 120861 باران باریدن:
 * fa: Page 96413 باز کردن:
 * fa: Page 580140 بازدید:
 * fa: Page 79048 بازی کردن:
 * fa: Page 142320 باستانی:
 * fa: Page 131936 بافتن:
 * fa: Page 130966 بالا:
 * fa: Page 158760 بام:
 * fa: Page 77486 بانک:
 * fa: Page 189073 باهوش:
 * fa: Page 77927 بوس:
 * fa: Page 77389 بوسیدن:
 * fa: Page 259656 بیدار کردن:
 * fa: Page 96855 بیرون:
 * fa: Page 79550 بیست:
 * fa: Page 171714 بیمار:
 * fa: Page 647202 تاریخی:
 * fa: Page 77827 تاریک:
 * fa: Page 78093 تازه:
 * fa: Page 81264 تاکسی:
 * fa: Page 79046 ترسیدن:
 * fa: Page 279288 تمام کردن:
 * fa: Page 125337 جامه:
 * fa: Page 78040 حال:
 * fa: Page 80763 حالا:
 * fa: Page 78451 خاله:
 * fa: Page 79760 خوابیدن:
 * fa: Page 79875 خواستن:
 * fa: Page 96221 خوشحال:
 * fa: Page 78765 خیابان:
 * fa: Page 78030 خیار:
 * fa: Page 98086 داداش:
 * fa: Page 191545 دایی:
 * fa: Page 253431 درس خواندن:
 * fa: Page 96416 دوست داشتن:
 * fa: Page 77489 دوغ:
 * fa: Page 79528 دیدن:
 * fa: Page 78003 دیروز:
 * fa: Page 199203 دیوان:
 * fa: Page 78236 را:
 * fa: Page 78714 راست:
 * fa: Page 83493 راه رفتن:
 * fa: Page 78946 راه:
 * fa: Page 174018 روس:
 * fa: Page 79503 ریختن:
 * fa: Page 119222 زود:
 * fa: Page 77782 زیبا:
 * fa: Page 77385 ساده:
 * fa: Page 69800 سال:
 * fa: Page 81695 سایه:
 * fa: Page 77390 سیاه:
 * fa: Page 172260 سینی:
 * fa: Page 79115 شانس:
 * fa: Page 77229 شاه:
 * fa: Page 183784 شهرستان:
 * fa: Page 78206 شیرین:
 * fa: Page 78207 شیرینی:
 * fa: Page 74962 شیشه:
 * fa: Page 79182 شیعه:
 * fa: Page 648109 صدا کردن:
 * fa: Page 130006 طولانی:
 * fa: Page 51336 فیل:
 * fa: Page 79028 فیلم:
 * fa: Page 547622 قوری:
 * fa: Page 78031 لیمو:
 * fa: Page 130935 لیوان:
 * fa: Page 63867 مال:
 * fa: Page 81069 ماندن:
 * fa: Page 77477 موش:
 * fa: Page 283088 ملاقات:
 * fa: Page 79876 میخ:
 * fa: Page 368805 میزبان:
 * fa: Page 580677 میلادی:
 * fa: Page 13861 میوه:
 * fa: Page 279287 ناحیه:
 * fa: Page 261845 نادان:
 * fa: Page 77963 نانوائی:
 * fa: Page 78195 ناهار:
 * fa: Page 325404 نایاب:
 * fa: Page 79359 نور:
 * fa: Page 79200 نوشابه:
 * fa: Page 642652 همزمان:
 * fa: Page 536266 پارسال:
 * fa: Page 77938 پایان:
 * fa: Page 80111 پاییز:
 * fa: Page 79899 پوشیدن:
 * fa: Page 130889 پولدار:
 * fa: Page 81578 پیاده:
 * fa: Page 394534 پیاده‌رو:
 * fa: Page 541766 پیش آمدن:
 * fa: Page 66690 چای:
 * fa: Page 59957 چینی:
 * fa: Page 77386 کار:
 * fa: Page 104376 کاغذ:
 * fa: Page 104849 کوتاه:
 * fa: Page 77405 کوه:
 * fa: Page 107538 کوچه:
 * fa: Page 261293 گاهی:
 * fa: Page 77248 گوش دادن:
 * fa: Page 59617 گوشت:
 * fa: Page 53541 صفر:
 * fa: Page 78724 آبجو:
 * fa: Page 320736 آبزن:
 * fa: Page 584287 آختن:
 * fa: Page 78086 آدرس:
 * fa: Page 79529 آراستن:
 * fa: Page 430821 آرایش:
 * fa: Page 608066 آرایشگاه:
 * fa: Page 65249 آزادی:
 * fa: Page 226277 آزردن:
 * fa: Page 89255 آزمودن:
 * fa: Page 79755 آزمون:
 * fa: Page 79199 آسانسور:
 * fa: Page 147064 آستر:
 * fa: Page 257954 آسودن:
 * fa: Page 181899 آشفتن:
 * fa: Page 620084 آشنایی:
 * fa: Page 78400 آشپز:
 * fa: Page 108573 آشپزخانه:
 * fa: Page 331267 آشیانه:
 * fa: Page 666826 آغازیدن:
 * fa: Page 383103 آغشتن:
 * fa: Page 79889 آفریدن:
 * fa: Page 407738 آلرژی:
 * fa: Page 131213 آلودن:
 * fa: Page 276357 آلودگی:
 * fa: Page 81083 آلیاژ:
 * fa: Page 392082 آلیختن:
 * fa: Page 382798 آماسیدن:
 * fa: Page 115954 آموزش:
 * fa: Page 231156 آمیختن:
 * fa: Page 78035 آناناس:
 * fa: Page 379043 آهسته:
 * fa: Page 245611 آوا:
 * fa: Page 77935 آوریل:
 * fa: Page 189962 آکندن:
 * fa: Page 598767 آگاهاندن:
 * fa: Page 333841 آگندن:
 * fa: Page 290845 ابرنواختر:
 * fa: Page 368322 ابزار:
 * fa: Page 319074 ابهام:
 * fa: Page 396477 اتحاد:
 * fa: Page 431565 اتحادیه:
 * fa: Page 315486 اتراق:
 * fa: Page 173080 اتصال:
 * fa: Page 77780 اتم:
 * fa: Page 78096 اتوبوس:
 * fa: Page 65241 اثر:
 * fa: Page 646438 اجاره:
 * fa: Page 18852 اجاق:
 * fa: Page 159903 اجتماع:
 * fa: Page 527332 اجرا:
 * fa: Page 80089 احساس:
 * fa: Page 74532 اختر:
 * fa: Page 254788 اختراع:
 * fa: Page 81646 اداره:
 * fa: Page 158656 ادب:
 * fa: Page 395133 ادغام:
 * fa: Page 97597 ادویه:
 * fa: Page 121396 اراده:
 * fa: Page 142406 ارتش:
 * fa: Page 279248 ارتعاش:
 * fa: Page 138375 ارتفاع:
 * fa: Page 383121 ارتقا:
 * fa: Page 406561 اردوگاه:
 * fa: Page 181913 ارزش:
 * fa: Page 655357 ارزه:
 * fa: Page 661187 ارسال:
 * fa: Page 78357 ارغوان:
 * fa: Page 79026 اروپا:
 * fa: Page 97014 استاد:
 * fa: Page 83001 استخر:
 * fa: Page 411940 استعاره:
 * fa: Page 397248 استعمار:
 * fa: Page 550353 استعمارگر:
 * fa: Page 656650 استودیو:
 * fa: Page 408562 استپ:
 * fa: Page 79415 اشتباه:
 * fa: Page 515575 اصطلاح:
 * fa: Page 82345 الکترون:
 * fa: Page 506163 الگوریتم:
 * fa: Page 66582 امتحان:
 * fa: Page 430530 امتیاز:
 * fa: Page 81254 امر:
 * fa: Page 392367 امضا:
 * fa: Page 606071 اندازه:
 * fa: Page 79443 انرژی:
 * fa: Page 77788 انقلاب:
 * fa: Page 77982 اهل:
 * fa: Page 98315 اژدر:
 * fa: Page 65154 اگر:
 * fa: Page 440022 ایزوتوپ:
 * fa: Page 121057 ایستادن:
 * fa: Page 407112 ایستگاه فضایی:
 * fa: Page 97141 ایستگاه:
 * fa: Page 119123 اینترنت:
 * fa: Page 96992 بادبان:
 * fa: Page 78028 بادنجان:
 * fa: Page 506002 بارگنج:
 * fa: Page 77382 بازو:
 * fa: Page 79047 بازی:
 * fa: Page 439768 بازیکن فوتبال:
 * fa: Page 113345 بازیگر:
 * fa: Page 134081 بالگرد:
 * fa: Page 666022 باند:
 * fa: Page 442460 بانکداری:
 * fa: Page 531319 بایگانی:
 * fa: Page 231867 بخش:
 * fa: Page 383801 بخشودن:
 * fa: Page 261325 برداشت:
 * fa: Page 550394 برشنگاری:
 * fa: Page 83318 برنامه:
 * fa: Page 442174 برگشتی:
 * fa: Page 665490 برگه:
 * fa: Page 79897 بستن:
 * fa: Page 264195 بسپار:
 * fa: Page 118962 بشر:
 * fa: Page 394856 بشردوستی:
 * fa: Page 157279 بعضی:
 * fa: Page 408563 بلشویک:
 * fa: Page 658349 بلم:
 * fa: Page 143649 بلور:
 * fa: Page 550395 بلورنگاری:
 * fa: Page 419798 بلورین:
 * fa: Page 96212 بلیت:
 * fa: Page 79551 بمب:
 * fa: Page 49762 بند:
 * fa: Page 79552 بندر:
 * fa: Page 669229 بندرگاه:
 * fa: Page 149277 بنفشه:
 * fa: Page 138585 بنگاه:
 * fa: Page 394788 بهداشت:
 * fa: Page 394787 بهداشتی:
 * fa: Page 79575 بهرام:
 * fa: Page 436387 بوجاری:
 * fa: Page 329814 بوران:
 * fa: Page 79381 بوفه:
 * fa: Page 63629 بوق:
 * fa: Page 257838 بومی:
 * fa: Page 77387 بچه:
 * fa: Page 92015 بیدار شدن:
 * fa: Page 82877 بیمارستان:
 * fa: Page 396423 بیکار:
 * fa: Page 130948 تاج:
 * fa: Page 79141 تاجیک:
 * fa: Page 78468 تاجیکستان:
 * fa: Page 66579 تاریخ:
 * fa: Page 95987 تاوه:
 * fa: Page 148089 تبدیل:
 * fa: Page 228634 تجربه:
 * fa: Page 664858 تحلیل:
 * fa: Page 531224 ترانزیستور:
 * fa: Page 142104 ترانه:
 * fa: Page 79566 ترش:
 * fa: Page 119001 ترشی:
 * fa: Page 432754 ترکیب:
 * fa: Page 257987 ترکیدن:
 * fa: Page 666498 تعمیرگاه:
 * fa: Page 167149 تفاوت:
 * fa: Page 642535 تقاضا:
 * fa: Page 105366 تقصیر:
 * fa: Page 115972 تلفظ:
 * fa: Page 71691 تلفن:
 * fa: Page 79031 تلویزیون:
 * fa: Page 164894 تماشا:
 * fa: Page 279214 تمرین:
 * fa: Page 182149 تنجیدن:
 * fa: Page 329820 توجیه:
 * fa: Page 419619 توشه:
 * fa: Page 659454 تیغه:
 * fa: Page 82530 جام:
 * fa: Page 509655 جایگاه:
 * fa: Page 578215 جریان:
 * fa: Page 84289 جشن:
 * fa: Page 154035 جلوه:
 * fa: Page 143710 جماعت:
 * fa: Page 190398 جمله:
 * fa: Page 79178 جوان:
 * fa: Page 531432 جوشکار:
 * fa: Page 531433 جوشکاری:
 * fa: Page 78145 حجاب:
 * fa: Page 429957 حریص:
 * fa: Page 666571 حریم:
 * fa: Page 115962 حساب:
 * fa: Page 78001 حمام:
 * fa: Page 79410 حوا:
 * fa: Page 436757 حوض:
 * fa: Page 83393 حکومت:
 * fa: Page 77923 حیاط:
 * fa: Page 71104 خانم:
 * fa: Page 96218 خانواده:
 * fa: Page 78146 خاکی:
 * fa: Page 79917 خبر:
 * fa: Page 71202 خدا:
 * fa: Page 407187 خدمت:
 * fa: Page 411939 خرابی:
 * fa: Page 149058 خصمانه:
 * fa: Page 131535 خطر:
 * fa: Page 505691 خلاصه:
 * fa: Page 222720 خنده:
 * fa: Page 408547 خواه:
 * fa: Page 261292 خودکار:
 * fa: Page 199228 خوراک:
 * fa: Page 77779 خوردن:
 * fa: Page 439401 خوردگی:
 * fa: Page 79671 خورش:
 * fa: Page 69504 خوش:
 * fa: Page 69508 خون:
 * fa: Page 503889 داروشناسی:
 * fa: Page 96993 داستان:
 * fa: Page 134095 داماد:
 * fa: Page 78982 دانش:
 * fa: Page 78011 دانشجو:
 * fa: Page 96542 دانشمند:
 * fa: Page 315733 دانشکده:
 * fa: Page 188261 دایره:
 * fa: Page 69100 دختر:
 * fa: Page 82453 درجه:
 * fa: Page 439956 درصد:
 * fa: Page 115961 دروغ:
 * fa: Page 77928 دریا:
 * fa: Page 321963 دستشویی:
 * fa: Page 173073 دستور:
 * fa: Page 112748 دستگاه:
 * fa: Page 183608 دستیار:
 * fa: Page 96241 دشمن:
 * fa: Page 443854 دفعه:
 * fa: Page 278992 دقت:
 * fa: Page 77268 دقیقه:
 * fa: Page 67241 دل:
 * fa: Page 582851 دلاور:
 * fa: Page 331268 دلسوز:
 * fa: Page 406571 دلیل:
 * fa: Page 62273 دنیا:
 * fa: Page 257689 دهانی:
 * fa: Page 83473 دوربین:
 * fa: Page 78412 دولت:
 * fa: Page 78000 دکتر:
 * fa: Page 278743 دگرگونی:
 * fa: Page 557687 دیدار:
 * fa: Page 229656 دیسک:
 * fa: Page 96055 دیوانه:
 * fa: Page 78626 رئیس:
 * fa: Page 395329 راننده:
 * fa: Page 113297 راهنما:
 * fa: Page 429956 راهنمایی:
 * fa: Page 81852 رفتار:
 * fa: Page 79547 رمان:
 * fa: Page 653224 رمزی:
 * fa: Page 45849 رنگ:
 * fa: Page 133146 روحانی:
 * fa: Page 124917 روزگار:
 * fa: Page 264070 زخمه:
 * fa: Page 79132 زرافه:
 * fa: Page 257681 زرنگ:
 * fa: Page 259057 زنانگی:
 * fa: Page 542218 زنبورک:
 * fa: Page 396780 زیستگاه:
 * fa: Page 129124 سؤال:
 * fa: Page 80112 سازمان:
 * fa: Page 77266 ساعت:
 * fa: Page 55428 سبب:
 * fa: Page 550529 سحابی:
 * fa: Page 419871 سفت:
 * fa: Page 77399 سفید:
 * fa: Page 78209 سلیقه:
 * fa: Page 244600 سمعک:
 * fa: Page 391135 سوخت:
 * fa: Page 83097 سوختن:
 * fa: Page 172886 سونامی:
 * fa: Page 261558 سپر:
 * fa: Page 77967 شاعر:
 * fa: Page 143671 شاگرد:
 * fa: Page 407195 شربت:
 * fa: Page 123361 شرط:
 * fa: Page 98338 شرکت:
 * fa: Page 81701 شغل:
 * fa: Page 80730 شمع:
 * fa: Page 77361 شنیدن:
 * fa: Page 54048 شهر:
 * fa: Page 50356 شوهر:
 * fa: Page 79121 شکم:
 * fa: Page 74963 صبح:
 * fa: Page 81088 صبحانه:
 * fa: Page 430822 صحنه:
 * fa: Page 45964 صدا:
 * fa: Page 67860 صرع:
 * fa: Page 79623 صفت:
 * fa: Page 143636 صفحه:
 * fa: Page 80879 صندلی:
 * fa: Page 78449 صورت:
 * fa: Page 493795 ضربه:
 * fa: Page 279086 ضعیف:
 * fa: Page 165696 طبقه:
 * fa: Page 105334 طبل:
 * fa: Page 398719 طرف:
 * fa: Page 77726 طلا:
 * fa: Page 598377 طلبیدن:
 * fa: Page 229615 طیف:
 * fa: Page 668979 ظرفشویی:
 * fa: Page 96005 عاشق:
 * fa: Page 60329 عامل:
 * fa: Page 156537 عبارت:
 * fa: Page 65219 عجیب:
 * fa: Page 83486 عدسی:
 * fa: Page 77903 عربی:
 * fa: Page 226411 عروس:
 * fa: Page 78675 عروسک:
 * fa: Page 199309 عروسی:
 * fa: Page 394766 عزا:
 * fa: Page 83570 عزیز:
 * fa: Page 434488 علاقه:
 * fa: Page 279193 عنوان:
 * fa: Page 72208 عکس:
 * fa: Page 390546 عیب:
 * fa: Page 81702 غمگین:
 * fa: Page 414660 غنودن:
 * fa: Page 11583 فارسی:
 * fa: Page 506191 فاشیسم:
 * fa: Page 666257 فاضلاب:
 * fa: Page 80906 فرستادن:
 * fa: Page 565062 فرسودن:
 * fa: Page 77781 فرش:
 * fa: Page 79530 فرمودن:
 * fa: Page 273756 فرمول:
 * fa: Page 82982 فرهنگستان:
 * fa: Page 395504 فرود:
 * fa: Page 79569 فرودگاه:
 * fa: Page 278981 فشردن:
 * fa: Page 60044 فضاپیما:
 * fa: Page 79622 فعل:
 * fa: Page 659150 فناوری:
 * fa: Page 81618 فهرست:
 * fa: Page 82347 فوتون:
 * fa: Page 78067 فکر:
 * fa: Page 317514 فکندن:
 * fa: Page 666723 فیلمنامه:
 * fa: Page 78014 قاعده:
 * fa: Page 484435 قالب:
 * fa: Page 67313 قسمت:
 * fa: Page 261708 قطار:
 * fa: Page 77383 قلب:
 * fa: Page 329339 قلیا:
 * fa: Page 189930 قهرمان:
 * fa: Page 79164 قیمت:
 * fa: Page 77617 لباس:
 * fa: Page 394926 لرزانک:
 * fa: Page 333992 لرزیدن:
 * fa: Page 104839 لهجه:
 * fa: Page 276331 لپ:
 * fa: Page 503632 لیزر:
 * fa: Page 153274 لیکن:
 * fa: Page 116036 مأمور:
 * fa: Page 116037 مأموریت:
 * fa: Page 432487 مؤسسه:
 * fa: Page 77370 مادربزرگ:
 * fa: Page 78401 ماشین:
 * fa: Page 312976 ماندگار:
 * fa: Page 335834 مایه:
 * fa: Page 253759 مثال:
 * fa: Page 329682 مجرد:
 * fa: Page 77644 مجلس:
 * fa: Page 666354 محترمانه:
 * fa: Page 397302 محور:
 * fa: Page 436456 مدرک:
 * fa: Page 62086 مردم:
 * fa: Page 78709 مرده:
 * fa: Page 83408 مرز:
 * fa: Page 142149 مریض:
 * fa: Page 399218 مسئول:
 * fa: Page 96871 مسافر:
 * fa: Page 81626 مشترک:
 * fa: Page 523829 مشق:
 * fa: Page 115963 مشکل:
 * fa: Page 84392 معدن:
 * fa: Page 79194 مغازه:
 * fa: Page 182220 مقام:
 * fa: Page 519354 مقصد:
 * fa: Page 391107 ممنوع:
 * fa: Page 60333 منزل:
 * fa: Page 258755 منطقه:
 * fa: Page 439496 منگنه:
 * fa: Page 329507 مهسا:
 * fa: Page 79288 مهمان:
 * fa: Page 407684 مهمانخانه:
 * fa: Page 60395 مهندس:
 * fa: Page 257683 موافق:
 * fa: Page 77496 موسیقی:
 * fa: Page 79010 مولکول:
 * fa: Page 382425 مکالمه:
 * fa: Page 326557 مکان:
 * fa: Page 78397 مکانیک:
 * fa: Page 102221 میدان:
 * fa: Page 420134 نامدار:
 * fa: Page 164557 نای:
 * fa: Page 547980 نایژه:
 * fa: Page 165553 نتیجه:
 * fa: Page 392448 نجات:
 * fa: Page 129233 نرده:
 * fa: Page 133184 نشانه:
 * fa: Page 573375 نشانی:
 * fa: Page 261068 نشت:
 * fa: Page 189887 نشستن:
 * fa: Page 258984 نظریه:
 * fa: Page 82529 نفت:
 * fa: Page 84594 نفر:
 * fa: Page 519122 نقش:
 * fa: Page 504243 نقشه:
 * fa: Page 398350 نقص:
 * fa: Page 278090 نما:
 * fa: Page 531320 نماهنگ:
 * fa: Page 97623 نمایش:
 * fa: Page 112746 نماینده:
 * fa: Page 150739 نمایه:
 * fa: Page 174455 نمونه:
 * fa: Page 550527 نوار:
 * fa: Page 279351 نوبت:
 * fa: Page 81851 نیرو:
 * fa: Page 78257 هتل:
 * fa: Page 81643 هدف:
 * fa: Page 142150 هدیه:
 * fa: Page 77264 هفته:
 * fa: Page 531321 همایش:
 * fa: Page 131216 همراه:
 * fa: Page 78090 همسایه:
 * fa: Page 134087 همکار:
 * fa: Page 656481 همکلاس:
 * fa: Page 78396 هنرمند:
 * fa: Page 79874 هنوز:
 * fa: Page 647810 واسط:
 * fa: Page 78786 والله:
 * fa: Page 77947 واژه:
 * fa: Page 279093 واکنش:
 * fa: Page 130900 وزن:
 * fa: Page 656478 وسیله:
 * fa: Page 159235 وضع:
 * fa: Page 60205 وقت:
 * fa: Page 383345 ویراستن:
 * fa: Page 254008 پادشاه:
 * fa: Page 80875 پارک:
 * fa: Page 659242 پخش:
 * fa: Page 77379 پدربزرگ:
 * fa: Page 420014 پرانتز:
 * fa: Page 557119 پراندن:
 * fa: Page 550393 پرتونگاری:
 * fa: Page 96078 پزشک:
 * fa: Page 188717 پس:
 * fa: Page 256749 پلاک:
 * fa: Page 80845 پله:
 * fa: Page 77373 پلو:
 * fa: Page 351219 پیراهن:
 * fa: Page 284750 پیشوند:
 * fa: Page 419842 پیکان:
 * fa: Page 131210 چابک:
 * fa: Page 510421 چاه:
 * fa: Page 78945 چاپگر:
 * fa: Page 48927 چتر:
 * fa: Page 13913 چشم:
 * fa: Page 666567 چلیدن:
 * fa: Page 134568 چمدان:
 * fa: Page 325531 چنان:
 * fa: Page 81322 چنگال:
 * fa: Page 188481 چنین:
 * fa: Page 75074 چهارشنبه:
 * fa: Page 67258 چهره:
 * fa: Page 77934 ژانویه:
 * fa: Page 77984 ژاپنی:
 * fa: Page 79009 ژن:
 * fa: Page 78095 کارت:
 * fa: Page 106780 کارمند:
 * fa: Page 96219 کارگاه:
 * fa: Page 78289 کارگر:
 * fa: Page 386789 کارگردان:
 * fa: Page 142318 کاسه:
 * fa: Page 335900 کاشانه:
 * fa: Page 657607 کالبدشناس:
 * fa: Page 326485 کالبدشناسی:
 * fa: Page 263993 کانی:
 * fa: Page 429163 کاهش:
 * fa: Page 77369 کباب:
 * fa: Page 49691 کردن:
 * fa: Page 333346 کرفس:
 * fa: Page 407955 کسر:
 * fa: Page 77968 کشور:
 * fa: Page 134365 کشیدن:
 * fa: Page 78092 کفش:
 * fa: Page 77485 کلاس:
 * fa: Page 81252 کلید:
 * fa: Page 74645 کمر:
 * fa: Page 390512 کمپلت:
 * fa: Page 662836 کمینه:
 * fa: Page 81068 کندن:
 * fa: Page 78813 کوشک:
 * fa: Page 598186 کوشیدن:
 * fa: Page 164550 کوفتن:
 * fa: Page 134094 کولر:
 * fa: Page 386591 کپسول:
 * fa: Page 134584 کیلو:
 * fa: Page 134500 کیلومتر:
 * fa: Page 226585 گداختن:
 * fa: Page 408552 گذر:
 * fa: Page 142194 گذرنامه:
 * fa: Page 77493 گربه:
 * fa: Page 49760 گردن:
 * fa: Page 79606 گرسنه:
 * fa: Page 79501 گرفتن:
 * fa: Page 79163 گروه:
 * fa: Page 435188 گریه:
 * fa: Page 558029 گسل:
 * fa: Page 258762 گلزار:
 * fa: Page 45963 گورستان:
 * fa: Page 77825 گوهر:
 * fa: Page 232275 گیسو:
 * fa: Page 186238 یاخته:
 * fa: Page 134502 یادداشت:
 * fa: Page 438766 یارانه:
 * fa: Page 323751 یکبار:
 * fa: Page 45959 آواز:
 * fa: Page 413630 اجلاس:
 * fa: Page 260863 اسپین:
 * fa: Page 290309 الکترونیک:
 * fa: Page 279088 انتشار:
 * fa: Page 558057 انتقال:
 * fa: Page 156736 انتگرال:
 * fa: Page 128940 اگرچه:
 * fa: Page 83492 باتری:
 * fa: Page 506547 بادبانی:
 * fa: Page 185344 تبریز:
 * fa: Page 433244 ترکش:
 * fa: Page 82264 جامعه:
 * fa: Page 260494 جاندار:
 * fa: Page 79070 جانورشناسی:
 * fa: Page 117468 جزء:
 * fa: Page 276347 جمعیت:
 * fa: Page 651091 جهت:
 * fa: Page 668942 حاکمیت:
 * fa: Page 79605 خشک:
 * fa: Page 541787 خوانا:
 * fa: Page 542575 خویشتنداری:
 * fa: Page 78088 رایانه:
 * fa: Page 81686 رده:
 * fa: Page 287261 رزم:
 * fa: Page 429165 رمز:
 * fa: Page 79703 زحل:
 * fa: Page 442141 ساختی:
 * fa: Page 566282 سپری:
 * fa: Page 96005 عاشق:
 * fa: Page 290194 لیر:
 * fa: Page 434842 مالک:
 * fa: Page 576446 متضاد:
 * fa: Page 411938 متقارن:
 * fa: Page 650202 متوالی:
 * fa: Page 232190 مجازی:
 * fa: Page 665167 مخلفات:
 * fa: Page 399029 مدخل:
 * fa: Page 420137 مرزبان:
 * fa: Page 97986 مرغ:
 * fa: Page 79577 مریخ:
 * fa: Page 156735 مشتق:
 * fa: Page 396627 نرخ:
 * fa: Page 257995 نوآوری:
 * fa: Page 290844 نواختر:
 * fa: Page 244779 نیز:
 * fa: Page 104407 ورود:
 * fa: Page 79926 ویروس:
 * fa: Page 264002 ویرگول:
 * fa: Page 394853 پایگاه:
 * fa: Page 395708 پذیرش:
 * fa: Page 550392 پرتودرمانی:
 * fa: Page 409579 پرهیز:
 * fa: Page 438849 پستچی:
 * fa: Page 96004 پناهگاه:
 * fa: Page 173423 پوشش:
 * fa: Page 504104 چارک:
 * fa: Page 643157 کرج:
 * fa: Page 77676 گوش:
 * fa: Page 81078 معماری:
 * fa: Page 253655 مازندران:
 * fa: Page 314885 قزوین:
 * fa: Page 334249 زنجان:

title: User:Benwing2/fa-audio


text:
GTPase

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  Any of a large family of hydrolase enzymes that bind to the nucleotide guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and hydrolyze it to guanosine diphosphate (GDP).

Translations

 * French: GTPase
 * German: GTPase
 * Italian:

title: GTPase


text:
lopung

Noun

 * 1) python

title: lopung


text: GTPases

title: GTPases


text: Citations:rivalmance

title: Citations:rivalmance


text:
Citations:Franconian

Attestations for uncommon use of the terms "West Franconian" and "East Franconian" referring to "western/eastern Low Franconian":

 * 1986, Anne Pauwels, Immigrant Dialects and Language Maintenance in Australia: The Case of the Cases of the Limburg and Swabian Dialects, p. 23
 * Limburgs is the only East Franconian dialect spoken in the Netherlands. All other Franconian dialects in the Netherlands are West Franconian.
 * 1993, Colette M. van Kerckvoorde, An Introduction to Middle Dutch, p. 1
 * The first three dialect groups [Flemish, Brabantic, Hollandic] may be referred to as West Franconian, while Limburgic is known as East Franconian.

title: Citations:Franconian


text: houkago

title: houkago