text:
daycase

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1)  A patient who is admitted to the hospital for a diagnostic test with the intention of being discharged on the same day.

title: daycase


text:
відганяти

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to drive away, to chase away, to drive off, to chase off
 * 2)  to drive away, to chase away, to banish
 * 3) to drive
 * 4) to distil off, to distill off

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: відганяти


text: daycases

title: daycases


text: day case

title: day case


text: Template:R:ar:MIU

title: Template:R:ar:MIU


text: day cases

title: day cases


text:
Talk:blown save

RFD discussion: October 2022–October 2023
"(baseball) A failure to convert a save opportunity to a save."

Only other OneLook reference is UD with a very different definition.

Seems SoP to me if one knows what a save is in baseball. DCDuring (talk) 15:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

 * I think it is worth keeping specific and official stats (e.g. at bat, run batted in, shot on goal, etc.). - TheDaveRoss  18:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

 * RFD-kept. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  12:06, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:blown save


text:
Talk:Boardwalk

RFD discussion: November 2022–November 2023
This is just the name of the space in Monopoly.--Simplificationalizer (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep – but the definition needs to be replaced by or extended with a figurative sense. In several of the given quotations, the term clearly is used in a figurative sense. Even when not (it is not always clear without further context), these uses appear to be independent of reference to the Monopoly universe. --Lambiam 22:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Kept no votes in 10 months and no delete votes other than nominator Purplebackpack89 22:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: since the original sense gave rise to a figurative sense, the original should be kept as well. Some will prefer to have it etymology-only, but I don't see a benefit of moving semantics to etymology. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Boardwalk


text:
Talk:many-partedness

RFD discussion: July–October 2023
Probably SOP many-partedness Apldeoo (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily SOP, but manypartedness doesn’t seem to meet CFI. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  17:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

 * Kept, no consensus. Retracted by nominator P. Sovjunk (talk) 13:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:many-partedness


text:
Talk:niggerfuck

RFD discussion: November 2023
One of dozens of intentionally offensive entries added (clearly to troll) to the page for the offensive racial slur. 24.251.242.73 21:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

 * The word is certainly offensive, but the entry does have the requisite minimum three quotations attesting to its existence. — Sgconlaw (talk) 22:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Keep. Is a word, is cited. Equinox ◑ 09:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedily kept. — Sgconlaw (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:niggerfuck


text:
Talk:pharmaceutical company

RFD discussion: September–November 2023
SOP? P. Sovjunk (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 * Seems so. Even the evidence for specific definition in EU legislation seems thin. Fay Freak (talk) 22:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as SoP. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  15:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as SoP. — Sgconlaw (talk) 21:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete' Ioaxxere (talk) 04:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD failedJewle V (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:pharmaceutical company


text:
Talk:evening class

RFD discussion: May–October 2023
I especially like the way they word the definition to make it sound like it's not SOP Skisckis (talk) 00:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I think the fact they are "typically for adults" gives the term some idiomaticity. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 19:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. If kids go to school in the evening somewhere, perhaps in a place where child labor is still common, we would still call it an evening class.  The fact that 99% or perhaps 100% of night schools are adult education isn't part of the definition, it's just a natural result of adults working mostly during the daytime. In theory we could argue for deletion of night school on the same basis, but since night schools aren't typically taught literally in the middle of the night, I would say it's a different situation and should be kept. — Soap — 09:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per lemmings and for the translations. PUC – 12:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A tough one. There are three translations, two of which are SOP, and the remaining one of which is a transparent compound. So it's not WT:THUB material (yet...). The lemming test is moderately persuasive, although the learner's dictionaries at OneLook are to be ignored. Soap's argument is convincing: if kids went to classes in the evening, we would undoubtedly call them "evening classes". See here for an example. However, the term "evening class" instantly conjures up a clear image (for me at least) of adults learning something, not necessarily university-level content, but perhaps a skill-based or hobby-based topic. That arguably makes the term greater than the sum of its parts, but on the other hand, I feel like we've deleted entries for less than that. This, that and the other (talk) 09:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

 * Kept per Lemmings test P. Sovjunk (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:evening class


text:
Talk:palm down

RFD discussion: July–October 2023
SOP. Not a special case. Compare face up, face down, hands up etc. which don't have an adverb sense. hands up, BTW, could do with a redefine - as stated by the entry creator, "Not such a smooth defn" Another fun pun (talk) 22:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 01:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD failed P. Sovjunk (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:palm down


text:
Talk:not uncommon

RFD discussion: October–November 2023
Bullshit definition is "having an abundance situated between common and uncommon.". This entry is not undeletable P. Sovjunk (talk) 13:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

 * I would delete, since you can do this with all kinds of words (e.g. "not improbable", or Tom Jones' "not unusual to be loved"). Is it a litotes? Our definition says litotes is "ironic", so perhaps that's not quite the right term. Equinox ◑ 13:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * A quasi-double-negative?P. Sovjunk (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure "ironic" should be part of the definition. A litotes can be used ironically, but it doesn't have too, imo. PUC – 14:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Equinox. A not unridiculous entry. PUC – 13:19, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. Compare not that uncommon, not at all uncommon and the even more litotetic hardly uncommon. --Lambiam 16:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not unuseless. Fay Freak (talk) 16:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Equinox. - -sche (discuss) 01:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD speedy failed as not uncrap Jewle V (talk) 22:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:not uncommon


text:
Talk:standing room only

RFD discussion: October 2023
I get that SRO is a valid TLA. But standing room only? Looks pretty dubious P. Sovjunk (talk) 21:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a commonly-used phrase in reference to a packed event. While it is a bit literal, it can also be used figuratively, such as when there are no seats available for any attendees forcing everyone to stand. I.e. the center of the dance floor is so packed that people are forced to stand along the walls. Netizen3102 (talk) 01:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. It rarely actually means standing room only, it means that all the seats are taken and that there is only room to stand for later arrivals, which is not evident from the phrase itself. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 03:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Keep per Netizen3102's point that the phrase can be used irrespective of whether the event has any seating (I have even seen it used for webinars virtual meetings), making it idiomatic. bd2412 T 05:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is also (quite rightly) an entry for . DonnanZ (talk) 06:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Alright then, kept and changed to adjective. P. Sovjunk (talk) 08:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

 * How can it be an adjective? I think it was correct as a phrase. DonnanZ (talk) 20:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

 * "Phrase" is generally a bullshit catch-all part of speech, I use it all the time. P. Sovjunk (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, I sent an email to Andy Pountney, chairman of Stourbridge FC, who confirmed he used the word adjectivally, and also confirmed our pronunciation of Stourbridge is correct. Nice bloke. P. Sovjunk (talk) 23:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:standing room only


text:
Talk:zero-day exploit

RFD discussion: November 2022–October 2023
Sum of parts. existed years before this entry. Equinox ◑ 22:59, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. The definition is also wrong, a zero-day exploit is an exploit, not an act of exploiting. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 20:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete' Ioaxxere (talk) 04:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD failed. Needs deletion P. Sovjunk (talk) 10:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:zero-day exploit


text:
Talk:cable internet

RFD discussion: November 2022–October 2023
SOP. Also translations in other languages:,. I'm not sure about as it's written without spaces. Benwing2 (talk) 20:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

 * Doesn't strike me as SOP: Fiber internet which is transmitted using fiber-optic cables does not fall under the umbrella of cable internet even though a SOP interpretation says so. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 21:08, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Really? Cable Internet is just Internet transmitted over cables; why would it matter if they're fiber-optic or coaxial? Benwing2 (talk) 00:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree that it doesn't make sense and that it's a ridiculous and annoying misnomer but it do be like that sometimes:, , , , , — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 03:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I think it's understood as being short for cable (television) Internet because it is delivered by television providers. At least in the USA.  So keep, as not being sum-of-parts after all. — Soap — 17:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

 * To me, the fibre issue mention above seems like mostly a red herring, since that distinction already resides in cable alone — if you have Google Fiber, but not cable TV, then you don't "have cable"/"get cable", even though a literal interpretation of would say you do. I think the current definition makes it sound like it's the coaxialness of the cable that is definitional, when it's really just the cable-ness of the cable that's definitional (to be cable internet, it has to be the same cable that you'd use if you were using the word cable by itself to say you "get cable" or to say you have "cable TV"). But I'm still on the fence about whether it's the kind of set phrase we should nonetheless have. Abstain. - -sche (discuss) 19:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD-kept as no consensus to delete. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  12:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:cable internet


text:
Talk:midnight snack

RFD discussion: May–October 2023
Probably SOP Wonderfool69 (talk) 09:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Leaning keep on the basis that I suspect it excludes breakfast.  That is, someone who works 4am to noon might wake up around midnight and have something to eat right away.  I have worked schedules  like that and I always thought of that as my breakfast, not a midnight snack or even a midnight meal.  But it's the sort of thing that would be near impossible to cite academically. — Soap — 09:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Leaning delete, as a breakfast can be a snack even in the scenario above, but I could be persuaded otherwise. I'd say that midnight feast is more idiomatic as it's associated with children sneakily eating at night, as says in Talk:midnight feast. --Overlordnat1 (talk) 10:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, I think this is idiomatic. A midnight snack needn't be at or around midnight, but at any time in the night when waking up to spend a penny. It's more idiomatic than "snack in the early hours" or "snack in the middle of the night". My preferred "midnight snack" is a biscuit or two. DonnanZ (talk) 18:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

 * I'm ambivalent. I know people who work from midnight to 8am and take their lunch break and eat lunch during those hours, rather than at midday. But I also know people who only wake up at noon and therefore refer to the period from noon to e.g. 3pm as morning. I wouldn't want separate senses for every possible shift in the meaning of every meal- and time- term (e.g., for breakfast, "a meal eaten in the morning upon waking up", "a meal eaten around noon by people who wake up then", "a meal eaten around 8pm by people who wake up then [to work graveyard shifts]", "a meal eaten at midnight by people who wake up then [to go to work at 4am]"). OTOH, we cover this decently well by qualifying breakfast and lunch as merely usually eaten in the morning and around midday. I'm unsure whether that translates into middnight snack being idiomatic, though; in Soap's scenario, I'd think the exclusion of breakfast would be because breakfast is typically counted as a meal and not a snack. And as for snacking at an hour other than exactly 12 o'clock, it's still a mid-night snack like a midday snack doesn't have to be eaten at exactly 12 o'clock, either. Meh. - -sche (discuss) 20:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

 * Keep and fix the definition. The phrase does not literally refer to a snack at midnight, but any snack late at night. If someone goes to bed at 8:00 PM, and wakes up for a snack at 10:30 PM, that can still be called a "midnight snack". bd2412 T 05:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, the more I think about it the more I support delete. Did the 'Midnight train to Georgia' leave at exactly 00:00 or was it closer to 23:30 or 00:30? I also agree with most, if not all, of what said above, though as far as breakfast being a meal not a snack, that begs the question: "What is the difference between a substantial snack and a light meal?". --Overlordnat1 (talk) 12:31, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * In this kind of situation, isn't the only necessary difference "people call / regard one as a meal and the other a snack"? I.e. people not calling a mightnight breakfast a midnight snack needn't be expected to have any basis like "objectively, it has to include X, Y, and Z to be a meal", just "we don't call breakfast a snack"? - -sche (discuss) 22:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * What I mean by breakfast is the first meal of the day, even if it's very small, like a single granola bar and some coffee. I think this should be kept on the basis that it can't be the first meal of the day, which we usually refer to as breakfast.  Someone who stays up late at night and eats before bed can have a midnight snack, and someone who wakes up hungry in the middle of the night can have a midnight snack, but someone who wakes up very early and eats right away can only have breakfast.  However I admit that there are very few people with such an early sleep schedule and some of them might prefer to call their wake-up meal a midnight snack, defying my thinking, if they eat a larger meal later that they prefer to call breakfast. Oh well. I think my logic is sound but I still hold back from typing out a proper boldfaced keep vote since what Im saying applies to a rare exceptional situation. Thanks, — Soap — 10:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, not literal. – Jberkel 13:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

 * Keep I would consider a 3 AM snack to be a midnight snack, but a 9 PM snack to not be a midnight snack. The tendency that a midnight snack is more likely to be eaten after rather than before midnight cannot be inferred from SoP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Kept per smarter people than Wonderfool P. Sovjunk (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:midnight snack


text:
Talk:alpha version

beta version
These are all SOP - particularly given that it's much more common to hear that a program is "in alpha" or "in beta", which shows that those words are simply acting as plain adjectives on the word "version". We don't currently have an entry for, but it works in exactly the same way. Theknightwho (talk) 06:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Weak delete. I work in this industry (occasionally): there are alpha and beta (and sometimes other) releases, and alpha and beta candidates, and just "alphas" and "betas". Same thing. It may be the case that these terms all derived from "alpha (etc.) version" (in which case we might want to keep it, as "mobile phone" despite "mobile"), but in that case I think we ought to have some strong sourcing. Equinox ◑ 01:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Ambivalent on this but the OED considers "alpha" and "beta" in the software sense as clippings of alpha testing and beta testing (rather than version), which seems plausible enough since their citations for the latter go back to the 1960s. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 12:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Could be a case of WT:JIFFY or similar thus, difficult to know, but maybe for parsimony as we can arguably cover the ideas on the pages alpha and beta alone weak delete. Fay Freak (talk) 20:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Err on the side of keeping: these are the headwords I would use for lookup. In Macmillan. Mark using "sum of parts" label if desired. Very good page views|nonchocolate. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. pre-alpha is currently a red link, btw. Ultimateria (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Not sure if I can vote without an account here, but as someone who looked up the word through Google and the Wiktionary definition was exactly what I was looking for (and I was very perplexed by the deletion message), I obviously want to keep this. --62.245.80.31 00:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Like the previous commenter I was someone who looked up the word through Google and the Wiktionary definition was exactly what I was looking for (and I was also very perplexed by the deletion message), I obviously want to keep this. The fact that pre-alpha is a red link is not a good argument to delete this, and I would say having the page arguably is a positive to help people keep the same meaning in discussions. -- 2001:4645:3D47:0:D1F6:24E6:6D:15D0; 2023-03-20T11:44Z (11:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC))
 * WT:JIFFY would support entries for alpha test/alpha testing etc, if it they are earlier than the challenged terms. If we have usage examples or a good set of collocations for alpha and beta we should satisfy those hunting for the meaning of all the SoP expressions. Delete. DCDuring (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Before 1950 alpha test" was often Alpha test or Alpha Test, referring to the Army Alpha test, one of the first widely used intelligence tests. There was other usage of alpha test to refer to a test that was applied first to test objects, preceding a possible beta test. I found a 1950 HP Journal article that referred to alpha test as "Lab Test of Functionality" and beta test as "Marketing Test of ..." (snippet view only), which is close to modern sense. Before 1970 "alpha version" appears in Google Books mostly in comparison of different sources (eg, manuscripts) of old documents and not at all in the context of electronic devices, software, etc. This, plus the OED's treatment suggest that alpha test and beta test are the expressions that introduce the modern senses of alpha and beta. The myriad modern uses of alpha and beta in their technical hardware and software senses seem SoP to me. DCDuring (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

 * This was very useful to me. Don't delete it. 216.24.45.34 19:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

 * Seeing the comments from IPs above, which look legitimate, I'm leaning keep now. This seems like a case of common sense where the utility of the existing detailed entries specifically under "... version" might outweigh a strict reading of the policy, bearing in mind that half the delete votes above are "weak" too. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 00:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

* Kept all P. Sovjunk (talk) 21:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Striking close by inexperienced editor. bd2412 T 15:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:alpha version


text:
Talk:have a whale of a time

RFD discussion: April–October 2023
I think this expression is doubly sum-of-parts, since both what precedes and what follows can be swapped out for other words, yet any resulting expression still depends on whale. Indeed, we already have the basic meaning of this expression listed at whale, sense 4, with citations of it was a whale of a lyric, a whale of a comedy, and having a whale of a time. The last phrase may be one of the most common formulations, but it is just as separable as the others.

I would support creating a redirect from to help navigation, as per the comment on talk:hell that led to me creating. — Soap — 13:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Well, already redirects to have a whale of a time. "whale of a" seems unfinished, though my Oxford lists it, along with have a whale of a time. Also  I would recommend Keep as is, or swap the redirect around. DonnanZ (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Swap with whale of a time, for which "to have" is not the only applicable verb (e.g., 1969, The New Yorker, Vol. 45, Part 3, p. 31: "The children were given a whale of a time, and then put back"; 1957, Time & Tide, Vol. 38, p. 356, "Brighton—the place for a whale of a time"; 2014, Mary Edner, People, Places and Things, p. 20: "I know how to show you a whale of a time". bd2412 T 18:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete both have a whale of a time and whale of a time. I was initially thinking that whale of a time might be kept as a set phrase, but since whale of a can be used with other words, and we already have an appropriate sense at whale (“Something, or someone, that is excellent”), I don’t think any other entries are required. Add the phrases as collocations at whale if desired. — Sgconlaw (talk) 11:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect have a whale of a time, a whale of a time, whale of a time, and perhaps whale of a to whale per Sgconlaw. - -sche (discuss) 00:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

 * Kept, despite the previous opinions. P. Sovjunk (talk) 20:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:have a whale of a time


text:
Talk:get vaccinated

RFD discussion: October–November 2023
Phrasebook bullshit P. Sovjunk (talk) 17:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

 * lol, delete. I hoped it had some idiomatic meaning like "go away". Equinox ◑ 17:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete. Boring, who even needs to say "get vaccinated" in a foreign tongue?

 * Delete. PUC – 09:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Delte. Not even any idiomatic meanings like get bent? – Guitarmankev1 (talk) 12:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with being vaccinated, I had all my jabs last month. This must be a bad joke. DonnanZ (talk) 22:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Didn't read the definition, did you? Equinox ◑ 08:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No. DonnanZ (talk) 10:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete. There is no instance in which you would need to say "get vaccinated" compared to anything else. CitationsFreak (talk) 22:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD failed early as blatant crap.Jewle V (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:get vaccinated


text:
Talk:victory

RFD discussion: December 2022–September 2023
I do not see how this is an interjection. Equinox ◑ 10:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

 * Just want to point out it's in the OED. — Sgconlaw (talk) 13:48, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Stuff like this seems pretty interjection-y to me: "They were poor, but they were rich in faith, and when they died they shouted, 'Victory, victory!'" "In the severest moments of the death-struggle, there was no intermission of the cry. 'Victory, victory, victory,' was still repeated."  "when in the rear of the army, and he heard the cannon, far from being frightened  he cried, Victory! Victory!"  etc. Inclined to keep. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 14:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Then is also an interjection:, , .  --Lambiam 22:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * In a hortative sense (as in your example 3, or a Braveheart caricature) I think "freedom" can be usefully defined as an interjection, yeah, with similar reasoning for "victory". The second example I am ambivalent on, I don't think that use is generically different from saying "A man!" when you see a man and the like—I selected the "victory" examples specifically because they're cases where it is not just an observation of a victory. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is an interjection, I am going to an interjection sense to, and . Fay Freak (talk) 03:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

 * And (football cheer) and  (calling to a dog) and  (shouting an insult) and and and Equinox ◑ 23:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Here’s another one for our growing collection of interjected nouns: . And then there is . --Lambiam 20:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Lovely. These are all unambiguously interjections syntactically: the question is which ones merit inclusion in a dictionary as such. The OED thinks victory does. The problem with the slippery slope idea is that we already have a good number of interjection lemmas that can be dismissed on similar grounds as any of these, e.g. (picking some random examples) apologies, condolences, battle stations, newsflash, checkmate, heads. So we might want to think about what the actual test(s) for inclusion are for an interjection, rather than simply stockpiling examples (of which we already have plenty)—unless it's just about lemmings. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Good point. Are there any formal linguistic tests for interjections? — Sgconlaw (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I guess it's not really something like that hinges on fine points of grammar like the participle vs. adjective discussions that people enjoy having: if you're shouting out a word by itself then it's an interjection by definition, even if it's also some part of speech (these are called "secondary interjections" in the literature). The question's just what the point of listing it as one would be. FWIW I don't get the conniptions about listing stuff like walkies or freedom or whatever as interjections if they're attestable and someone cares enough to add it, we're not short of space. The one category I'd probably exclude is "vocatives" or generally just exclaiming because something exists/happened (goal etc, and imo checkmate). I won't die on the hill of victory anyway, it just might be worth having a beer parlour discussion or something. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

 * The information of whether a given lexeme has been used hortatively within the corpus doesn't strike me as lexical information of that word. Additionally, having a distinct interjection section for these semantically indistinguishable cases isn't really worth anything from a usability perspective either. I'm casting a weak delete for now. I also think we should consider creating a new binding policy page for our parts of speech and their specific inclusion criteria. First English participles/adjectives, then German adjectives/adverbs and now interjections. We'd do ourselves a favor by writing down the consensus somewhere so that we don't have to relitigate everything or, even worse, end up in an internally inconsistent state (as we currently are with respect to ex- terms). Related: . — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 20:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Leaning towards keep. If text appears as "Victory!" it would be an interjection. DonnanZ (talk) 11:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

 * Keep if it's in the OED. That is, err on the side of; clear case it is not. (Oder so. Ist Deutsch erlaubt or streng verboten? Na ja, es gibt nicht unbedingt viel Sinn, in einer englischen Diskussion auf Deutsch zu schreiben. Aber macht Spass. Also lieber ignorieren und meine Fehler entschuldigen.) --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

 * Kept P. Sovjunk (talk) 03:29, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:victory


text:
Talk:pre-alpha version

RFD discussion: October 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:alpha version.

title: Talk:pre-alpha version


text:
Talk:beta version

RFD discussion: October 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:alpha version.

title: Talk:beta version


text: turn upon

title: turn upon


text:
відігнати

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to drive away, to chase away, to drive off, to chase off
 * 2)  to drive away, to chase away, to banish
 * 3) to drive
 * 4) to distil off, to distill off

title: відігнати


text:
Talk:יום הדין

RFC discussion: July 2022–September 2023
Hebrew. Created by User:Simplificationalizer: bad formatting, missing headword. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Use template he-proper noun, removed Rosh Hashana from the definition, added link to wikipedia Taokailam (talk) 19:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Resolved Jewle V (talk) 21:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:יום הדין


text:
Talk:bilicyanine

RFC discussion: February–September 2023
English. Tagged by -sche in December 2022 giving the reason, check for langiage: it was classified as part English part French.... — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 19:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

 * Fixed Jewle V (talk) 21:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:bilicyanine


text:
Talk:djinhöv

RFC discussion: August 2019
Messy etymology; see the entry for explanation. — Eru·tuon 17:50, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:djinhöv


text:
Talk:Dievoort

RFC discussion: May 2020–October 2023
Reported to me by User:J3133. Generally messy. — Eru·tuon 07:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Fixed —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 01:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Dievoort


text:
Talk:bastille

RFC discussion: October 2021–July 2023
Bit of a mess; a misformatted "confusion of" introduced in Special:Diff/64046091 and a bunch of translation tables that don't correspond to any of the listed senses. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 12:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ (and set as WOTD for 14 July 2023). — Sgconlaw (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:bastille


text:
Talk:सह

RFC discussion: September 2013–July 2023
Sanskrit: Rfc-sense: "a species of plant" and "name of various plants"

These are virtually worthless as definitions, but similar definition are common among Sanskrit entries here. Can this be improved upon at all? Similar situations in Latin and especially Greek usually generate plausible conjectures. Some of the cases where a species name is given are not much better as the species name may be used nowhere but in dictionaries or south Asian languages. DCDuring TALK 00:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * There are analogous cases in Old French especially regarding plants where there's no way to be sure all the authors are talking about the same plant. I can see a lot of problems on that page, "a species of plant" seems redundant but "name of various plants" is probably as good as it can get. Mglovesfun (talk) 01:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That is a typical Sanskrit page with typical problems, including no differentiation of proper nouns, except for higher prevalence of "name of" as part of the definition. The definitions look like wikiformatted copies of old Sanskrit-English dictionaries, possibly different ones combined, with the old dictionaries not being as well done as LSJ (Ancient Greek)or L&S (Latin). The definiens often use polysemic English words with no gloss to suggest which modern sense. DCDuring TALK 01:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * You haven't begun to guess at the true enormity of the problem: I've copypasted the relevant part of the Monier-Williams entry from a pdf I downloaded (enclosed in collapsible header templates for those who don't care to read through it all), and interleaved it with our definitions. The OCR severely mangled the romanized Sanskrit and it would have taken too long to fix it, so don't try to decipher that part. As you can see, our entry is simply the Monier-Williams translated into our format, stripped of the source abbreviations, and paraphrased a bit.
 * It seems like a combination of multiple dictionaries because Monier-Williams went through libraries-full of sources and made notes, then compressed those notes into an incredibly dense and cryptic format in order to fit everything (barely) into one very large volume. All the bulleted lines below take up what looks like a single 2 or 3 inch square in a much larger three-column page, with nothing separating them but spaces and semicolons. The amount of detail in that work is astonishing- it would take years to properly unpack all the abbreviations and taxonomic names and convert them to modern equivalents. Just one page would take days! Nobody has all the necessary reference material at hand to do it, anyway, so the best we seem to be able to do is reformat this massive lump of condensed shorthand to make it look like a Wiktionary entry, without properly decoding it.

 * 1) powerful, mighty
 * powerful, mighty, RV. ;
 * 1) (ifc.) overcoming, vanquishing
 * (ifc.) overcoming, vanquishing, MBh. ;
 * 1) bearing, enduring, withstanding, defying, equal to, a match for (+ genitive or compound)
 * bearing, enduring, withstanding, defying, equal to, a match for (gen. or comp.), MBh.;
 * 1) causing, effecting, stimulating, exerting
 * KSv. &c.; causing, effecting, stimulating, exerting, Sis. ;
 * 1) able to, capable of (infinitive or compound)
 * able to, capable of (inf. or comp.), Kalid. ;
 * 1) the month
 * m. the month Margasirsha (see sahas), VS.;
 * 1) a particular fire
 * a partic.Agni, MBh.;
 * 1) a species of plant
 * a species of plant, AV. ;
 * 1) name of a son of manu
 * N. of a son of Manu, Hariv.;
 * 1) name of a son of  and
 * of a son of Prana and Urjasvati, BhP. ;
 * 1) name of a son of
 * of a son of Dhritarashtra, MBh. ;
 * 1) name of a son of Krishna and Madri
 * of a son of Krishna and Madri, BhP.;
 * 1) (with Buddhists) name of a division of the world
 * (with Buddhists) N. of a division of the world (with loka-dhatu,'the world inhabited by men'),Karand.;
 * 1) name of various plants
 * N. of various plants (accord, to L.-Aloe Perfoliata, dandotpala, rasna &c.), VarBrS.;
 * 1) Unguis odoratus
 * Unguis Odoratus, L. ;
 * (a), f. the earth, L.;
 * n. = bala, L. ;
 * 1) kind of salt
 * a kind of salt, L. =I.
 * a kind of salt, L. =I.

 * Chuck Entz (talk) 06:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I had looked at some of the Dictionary pages given as references.
 * My interests and "expertise" are quite limited. I think I can modernize some of the taxonomic names from the 130-year-old ones that were the best he had to work with, but I have to always look at the dictionary page itself. Some of the species names I cannot find in any authoritative online source.
 * So our Sanskrit entries are "pretend" entries, even worse than the unchanged Webster 1913 entries (for current words). DCDuring TALK 16:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I guess what's worst is that many of the pages don't have the reference to the dictionary page. DCDuring TALK 16:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

DCDuring keeps repeating that we're dealing with a "130-year old dictionary" but he fails to mention that the dictionary is a synthetic result of tens of thousands of man-hours, and that it's perfectly valid today due to the simple fact that Sanskrit is an extinct language that doesn't change anymore. If the respected authorities have failed to determine what exact species of plants saha denotes in some works, then probably nobody else will. Comparing it to Webster 1913 and modern English is stupid. Regarding proper nouns - they are not recognized as a separate lexical category by Sanskrit grammarians (there is no uppercase/lowercase distinction, there are tens of thousands of deities in Hinduism representing just about any imaginable concept). I have been separating proper/common nouns in some early entries, but have stopped doing so. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It's a great dictionary. It's available online for free to scholars, so Wiktionary's having copied pages is simply duplicative. It's copied pages are only a first draft of a Wiktionary entry. DCDuring TALK 16:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Apart from the research done on the new interpretation of meanings of Sanskrit words in the 20th and 21th century, it's a complete entry. Sanskrit entries copied from MW dictionary are far more complete than English entries copied from Webster 1913, because the language is not productive anymore as a literary device. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I have three problems with our English entries based on MW 1913 and two with the Sanskrit entries. To me they have one problem in common.
 * with English entries from MW 1913:
 * it has English words whose meaning and usage context have changed in some cases, whereas we have not brought the entry up to date.
 * it uses a dated English for all of its definitions
 * it includes lists of synonyms in the definiens (instead of under Synonyms), a defining style we don't use.
 * with Sanskrit entries:
 * it does not adhere to Wiktionary format and structure eg, not having distinct L3/4 sections for proper and common nouns and non-definiens material in the definitions.
 * it uses a dated English for all of its definitions.
 * Just as with MW 1913 entries: I am glad we have the Sanskrit entries. They are an excellent first draft. They need work to be up to our high standards. DCDuring TALK 01:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've told you already: proper nouns are not recognized as a separate lexical category by Sanskrit grammarians. This "e.g." of yours is the only objection you actually have to the structure of Sanskrit entries, and yet you keep parroting it as if it is one of many. Non-definiens material (i.e. the list of works were the set of meanings makes appearance) is essential due to the fact that Sanskrit literature stretches over three millennia, and someone reading Rgveda is not interested in the same meanings as someone reading Gita Govinda. We already include non-definiens material in all of the entries - they are called context labels. I fail to see how "this meaning is only used in UK" is any different than "this meaning is only used in the Vedas".
 * Most of its English is perfectly fine. You're needlessly exaggerating. If you find "dated English" feel free to update it. Perhaps some terms are a bit dated, but often no clear non-dated synonyms exist, and replacing them could introduce new interpretation of some words. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 16:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * All of this makes it seem as if a user of the material would be better off to be using the complete text, not Wiktionary's half-formatted, subject-to-insufficiently-respectful-editing version. For example, see Category:Sanskrit proper nouns. Do we need 97 RfC for them?
 * What value are we adding if all we do is copy? One value might be that we can link to the Sanskrit from other language entries. But that is not for Sanskrit scholars who know the peculiarities of the original dictionary; it is for ordinary Wiktionarians and folks who are simply curious, even recreational users. As scholars have the free online source and should have page links in the Wiktionary entry to that source from every entry copied from it, our Sanskrit entries ought be rendered consistent with Wiktionary format to facilitate use by those other than scholars. DCDuring TALK 17:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Half-formatted subject-to-insufficiently-respectful-editing version? I'm not annoyed by your half-baked attempts of pretend-trolling. Goodbye. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 17:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The really terrible one is the neuter noun =, because बल has 28 noun definitions. Which one of the 28, or all 28 of them? Limiting only to neuter nouns transliterated as bala, that's down to 14. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

 * if either of you would like to modernize the entry any. - -sche (discuss) 21:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

 * Well, it took ten years to add the gloss unknown which plant. Lethant (talk) 23:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:सह


text:
Talk:antédiluvien

RFC discussion: September 2023
Has two identical adjective senses. (Perhaps one of them is supposed to be a noun sense?) — Sgconlaw (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Olybrius added the second sense with . Olybrius, what was your intention? —Mahāgaja · talk 17:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think I know what the intention was: is a synonym of  in the sense  but not in the other senses. I feel like this could be better indicated somehow. —Mahāgaja · talk 17:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * any chance you can tidy this up, as you are a French speaker? I note from fr.wiktionary that there are noun senses too. — Sgconlaw (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Better now? —Mahāgaja · talk 22:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Wiktionnaire lists them as two senses, with the "antediluvian" one being listed as "vieilli". I think it would be better to keep the senses distinct and add to the figurative sense. I'll go ahead and do that, but let me know if anyone objects. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 22:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am sorry, my edit wasn't very clear (I am a bit lazy). My intention was merely to add the figurative/humorous sense which, I think, should indeed be distinguished even though they translate similarly. Merging both senses seems confusing. Olybrius (talk) 22:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The entry looks better now. Thanks everybody. — Sgconlaw (talk) 04:16, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:antédiluvien


text:
Category talk:ami:Action

RFC discussion: December 2021–November 2023
This category should be reorganized or renamed in some way but I'm not sure how or into what. Ffffrr (talk) 21:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This looks like a solely grammatical category, probably covering some subset of Category:Amis verbs. There's no reason to have this as a topical category. might be able to explain the rationale for this category, but they haven't edited here for over a year. I notice that most, but not all of the members in Category:Amis verbs are in this category- it might be possible to figure out the reason behind the category by comparing the non-overlapping words to the rest. The obvious guess is that the these are verbs that describe actions ( as opposed to  or ) verbs. Perhaps  might be able to help. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * In this dissertation (Wu 2006), "action verbs" are mentioned as the complement of "state verbs", so yes, the term pretty much refers to the same thing as "dynamic verbs". I don't think this is a very useful category, as it does not fully predict the basic morphological properties of a verb in Amis (including lexicographically important information like the choice of the actor voice prefix which can be mi- or ma-). Also, the dictionary that is cited (new link: https://e-dictionary.ilrdf.org.tw/ami/search.htm) does not use the label "action verb", see e.g., which is categorized as "Action" here, but not – as far as I can see – in the e-dictionary entry: https://e-dictionary.ilrdf.org.tw/ami/terms/254601.htm.
 * Without hard criteria (About Amis is still blank), the category is hard to maintain (e.g. why is included, but not ). –Austronesier (talk) 10:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * After almost 2 years since the last comment in the RFD discussion or here, I've removed it from all entries and deleted it. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

RFD discussion: December 2021–November 2023
The concept behind this topical category is obviously fundamentally flawed: the only explanatory text is the sentence: "Verb words about action in the Amis language of Taiwan", but these aren't verbs on the subject of "action", but members of some kind of class of verbs referring to actions as opposed to states.

This has been posted on Requests for cleanup, but it looks to me like we would have to know more about both the concept behind the category and about the language in question to have any hope of making a real category out of it. As it is, this is the ad hoc creation of one person, and could very easily be based on a misinterpretation of the grammar of a language they don't speak.

As for preserving the information it contains, there's very little benefit to being able to see that certain terms are believed to be related to each other for some reason we don't fully understand, and there's no way to maintain the category. Are the verbs that aren't in the category excluded because they don't belong there, or is it just a matter of what the category creator got around to before they stopped editing? If someone adds a new Amis verb entry, does it belong to the category or doesn't it? Pinging as category creator, and  as participants in the RFC discussion.Chuck Entz (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

I see the category as mostly unnecessary, if it cannot be cleaned up then I guess it should be deleted then. If all Amis verbs were included then that would be redundant as https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Amis_verbs already does that. Ffffrr (talk) 22:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, although I might change my mind if we could still get input from the creator of the category. It appears from various sources about Amis that the term "Action verbs" has been used as a complement to "State/stative verbs", but without known exact criteria and no documentation about its use, the category is not maintainable. The online source that is used for most Amis entries does not categorize verbs in that way, and there are several entries of obviously non-stative verbs that were added, but not categorized as "Action [verbs]" by the category creator. So the current application of the category is not just undocumented but also unintuitive. –Austronesier (talk) 17:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

 * RFD-Deleted Chuck Entz (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Category talk:ami:Action


text:
Talk:oil-canning

RFC discussion: August 2016
English. Does this actually make sense? – Jberkel (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. But I can't see a distinction between senses #1 and #2. It seems like the same thing (mild deformation of a sheet of metal) just one occurs in manufacturing and one occurs when the item is already in place (roofing). Presumably because oilcans are round and not flat sheets. I'd just reduce it to a single definition (like mine in brackets above) and be done with it. I assume existence is not an issue here? Renard Migrant (talk) 16:42, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:oil-canning


text:
Talk:Dievoet

RFC discussion: May 2020–October 2023

 * See Talk:Dievoort.

title: Talk:Dievoet


text:
turned of

Phrase

 * 1)  Advanced beyond (a specified age).

title: turned of


text:
glycocyamidine

Noun

 * 1) A cyclic derivative of glycocyamine.

title: glycocyamidine


text: glycocyamidines

title: glycocyamidines


text:
Talk:familistery

RFV discussion: August–October 2023
Apparently only used as uppercase Familistery, an actual place in the 19th century SpAway (talk) 16:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

 * RFV failed P. Sovjunk (talk) 16:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:familistery


text:
Talk:symmetrophilia

RFV discussion: September–November 2023
I found one quote for each on archive.org but nothing else. Ioaxxere (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

RFV Failed Ioaxxere (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:symmetrophilia


text:
Talk:turban-top

RFV discussion: October 2023
In a couple of dictionaries, not much "in the wild" P. Sovjunk (talk) 12:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, because these mushrooms are rare, plus it is probably a local term. I have cited it though with 4 quotes which we could find – there must be more not digitally searchable. Remarkably, it has become kind of ghost word through the dictionaries: while it apparently existed around 1800, hundred years later it was used by a German authority, presumably only knowing it from dictionaries, and another hundred years later by the Chinese in some sloppy bibliography. Fay Freak (talk) 13:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:turban-top


text:
Talk:fire roll

RFV discussion: September–November 2023
A bunch of dictionaries have this term, but I couldn't find it (didn't look too hard, granted) Jewle V (talk) 11:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

 * Yes well, WF, can you please look harder before RFVing everything. You are making a lot of work. One cite added; more probably to follow. (What did you even try searching for?) Equinox ◑ 21:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Making a lot of work, and doing a lot of work :) P. Sovjunk (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Three citations now added. Equinox ◑ 21:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 * RFV passed.P. Sovjunk (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:fire roll


text:
Talk:acquaintanced

RFV discussion: August–October 2023
Anon complained about this. It has but one cite. Not clear whether this is a directly denominal adjective or a past participle of acquaintance, for which we have no PoS section. DCDuring (talk) 14:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

 * Trivially citable. Mostly used by foreigners. Mark nonstandard maybe. Equinox ◑ 16:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

 * Cited. (Not sure I agree with eq that it's mostly used by foreigners. Maybe in the 21st c.) —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I see that acquaintancing is attestable in the US in the 19th century and more widely in the 20th. It's hard to find verbal instances of acquaintance or acquantances in verbal use. Is the existence of acquaintancing sufficient for us to posit aquaintance as a verb? DCDuring (talk) 18:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD failed and tagged as rare P. Sovjunk (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * RFV-passed, you mean? - -sche (discuss) 07:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:acquaintanced


text:
Talk:Porra

RFV discussion: October 2023
“(South Africa, derogatory, offensive) a person of Portuguese heritage, language or descent”. Uses in English, not Afrikaans, required. — Sgconlaw (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Cited. Einstein2 (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Porra


text:
Talk:vaccine strollout

RFV discussion: June–November 2023
Did this survive past hotword status? - TheDaveRoss  12:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I found two hits for strollout (all Australian), but "vaccine strollout" seems obvious SOP - one hit is about slow climate measures, not vaccines, so it's not like the word only occurs within a COVID context. Smurrayinchester (talk) 09:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * When three cites are found for it, it should be RfDed. I'd be surprised if we can't find cites in a non-vaccine context. I can't find cites in Google Naews for strollout other than between July 30, 2021 when it was used in The Australian and December 3, 2021 when Australian TV show hosts were flummoxed by the word having been named Macquarie's WOTY, though they had never heard it. I expect strollout will (barely) get out of hotword status. DCDuring (talk) 16:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * When three cites are found for it, it should be RfDed. I'd be surprised if we can't find cites in a non-vaccine context. I can't find cites in Google Naews for strollout other than between July 30, 2021 when it was used in The Australian and December 3, 2021 when Australian TV show hosts were flummoxed by the word having been named Macquarie's WOTY, though they had never heard it. I expect strollout will (barely) get out of hotword status. DCDuring (talk) 16:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * When three cites are found for it, it should be RfDed. I'd be surprised if we can't find cites in a non-vaccine context. I can't find cites in Google Naews for strollout other than between July 30, 2021 when it was used in The Australian and December 3, 2021 when Australian TV show hosts were flummoxed by the word having been named Macquarie's WOTY, though they had never heard it. I expect strollout will (barely) get out of hotword status. DCDuring (talk) 16:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

 * RFV failed P. Sovjunk (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:vaccine strollout


text:
Talk:whorenalism

RFV discussion: September–November 2023
Same as above. Ioaxxere (talk) 21:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

RFV Failed Ioaxxere (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:whorenalism


text:
Talk:Israeli Destruction Forces

RFV discussion: October 2023
"Do my personal politics trump CFI?" A question we ask ourselves every day. Equinox ◑ 23:39, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Already three+ cites on main page. RFV passed. CitationsFreak (talk) 04:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Israeli Destruction Forces


text:
Talk:North American pavement ape

RFV discussion: October–November 2023
Tempted to just delete this crap. --Robbie SWE (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Huh? It's definitely racist, but why this term??? CitationsFreak (talk) 20:49, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

 * From some remaining web-hits, has been used for more than five years by now, also abbreviated NAPA or napa, but protologism, also to avoid automated filters, should not be included: some Nazi and his friends is no sufficient coverage, as he will agree himself. There are codes that should stay codes. Fay Freak (talk) 20:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Sgconlaw (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:North American pavement ape


text:
Talk:kill your heros

RFV discussion: October 2023
J3133 (talk) 06:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

cited Kiwima (talk) 02:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * These use, not the non-standard . J3133 (talk) 09:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I moved the entry to . This is presumably a simple error or confusion by the entry creator. This, that and the other (talk) 09:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * a bit snowcloney terrain, no? kill your X. Jberkel 10:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:kill your heros


text:
Talk:nigro

RFV discussion: October–November 2023
Added by a globally locked user, so could be speedied, but it seems at least believable (sadly). This, that and the other (talk) 01:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Hmm... etymology might be wrong (compare Latin nigro, and ). Equinox ◑ 16:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Sgconlaw (talk) 20:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:nigro


text:
Talk:symmetrophobe

RFV discussion: September–November 2023

 * See Talk:symmetrophilia.

title: Talk:symmetrophobe


text:
Template talk:side box

RFD discussion: August–October 2023
Does the same job as mbox, noting that the mbox template is vastly more flexible (it's copied from Wikipedia, need I say more?). I switched listen to use mbox with no noticeable change in appearance, so now only two pages use side box. This, that and the other (talk) 07:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 03:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete. Benwing2 (talk) 20:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

RFD-deleted This, that and the other (talk) 03:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Template talk:side box


text:
Wiktionary talk:Frequency lists/A Frequency Dictionary of Persian

RFD discussion: November 2023
Please do not delete this gem of a page - it has been a great help for many Persian-students I know - especially considering Persian words do not have short vowels included normally - but they are included here, which is very helpful.
 * Apparently the issue with this page was that it was suspected of being a copyright violation. I'll invite to comment here. This, that and the other (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Apparently there's a CD with the full text in tab-delimited text format and this is a version with only the first 3 columns of that data. As far as I can tell from the text on Google Books, it's a character-for-character copy of the words and their transliterations. It's one thing to have something like this for personal use, but sharing it with the world under a Creative Commons license just isn't going to fly. It may seem not seem like the kind of creative work that would be copyrightable, but there's such a thing as a compilation copyright: while any given line may not be copyrightable, the list in its entirety is- and we seem to have reproduced all of it. It would be nice to offer this for free, but it doesn't belong to us and the authors and publishers have a right to charge for it. For those who need it, they can buy the book and/or CD. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and deleted it. We can always restore it if we change our minds- and if the WMF legal team will let us. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * , since this is a legal matter. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @This, that and the other Indeed, it appears to be a verbatim copy of a copyrighted work. @Omecomec, Whilst it is regrettable that this will no longer be able to be used by students, this project must hold itself to higher standards than any of us may wish to adopt in our private lives. If you are a Persian speaker yourself, I encourage you to expand on our existing lists. I unfortunately do not have time at the moment but you could consider taking a wordlist from the Wortschatz Leipzig project and adding short vowel markings. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need some pointers. That way we can ensure the results of our efforts can be released under a Creative Commons licence. Helrasincke (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)


text:
Thesaurus talk:inceldom

RFD discussion: August–October 2023
Really? lattermint (talk) 17:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete after moving the synonyms to, since (in my understanding) the thesaurus should only be used when a term has too many nyms to comfortably fit in its entry . — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 02:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete. Also none of the terms on that page are actually synonyms of . Ioaxxere (talk) 04:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ioaxxere Oh, good point, lol. I guess technically would be a hypernym of ? — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 15:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

RFD-deleted This, that and the other (talk) 03:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Thesaurus talk:inceldom


text:
uthängning

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) naming and shaming

title: uthängning


text: uthängningen

title: uthängningen


text: uthängningar

title: uthängningar


text: uthängningarna

title: uthängningarna


text: uthängnings

title: uthängnings


text: uthängningens

title: uthängningens


text: uthängningars

title: uthängningars


text: uthängningarnas

title: uthängningarnas


text: picrochromite

title: picrochromite


text:
rulleyman

Noun

 * 1)  A man who operated a rulley.

title: rulleyman


text: rulleymen

title: rulleymen


text: AI whisperers

title: AI whisperers


text: Category:Central Kurdish renderings of English male given names


text: Category:Central Kurdish terms derived from English


text: Category:Central Kurdish terms borrowed from English


text:
arbeidsschuw

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

title: arbeidsschuw


text:
werkschuwheid

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) workshyness

title: werkschuwheid


text:
arbeidsschuwheid

Etymology
From.

title: arbeidsschuwheid


text:
solde intermédiaire de gestion

Noun

 * 1)  intermediate management balance

title: solde intermédiaire de gestion


text: ferralosols

title: ferralosols


text: ferrandins

title: ferrandins


text: ferredoxines

title: ferredoxines


text: ferribeidellites

title: ferribeidellites


text: ferrioxidases

title: ferrioxidases


text: ferrochloroquines

title: ferrochloroquines


text: ferrihexacyanides

title: ferrihexacyanides


text: ferromagnetites

title: ferromagnetites


text: ferromagnetizations

title: ferromagnetizations


text: Festbiers

title: Festbiers


text: ficuseptines

title: ficuseptines


text: fifies

title: fifies


text: filipods

title: filipods


text: fimbrilins

title: fimbrilins


text: fimbriomes

title: fimbriomes


text: flixels

title: flixels


text: flourmills

title: flourmills


text: fluoroaluminates

title: fluoroaluminates


text: fluorochlorides

title: fluorochlorides


text: fluorostyrenes

title: fluorostyrenes


text: fluorotryptophans

title: fluorotryptophans


text: flusterers

title: flusterers


text: fluviokarsts

title: fluviokarsts


text: focalities

title: focalities


text: foitites

title: foitites


text: พิษณุ

title: พิษณุ


text: foraminules

title: foraminules


text: foragements

title: foragements


text: Eigentumsdelikte

title: Eigentumsdelikte


text: Eigentumsdeliktes

title: Eigentumsdeliktes


text: Eigentumsdelikts

title: Eigentumsdelikts


text: for'eads

title: for'eads


text: forecrops

title: forecrops


text: foregirths

title: foregirths


text: fore-glories

title: fore-glories


text:
Talk:ܢܩܒܬܐ

Plural form
@Antonklroberts Could you add the plural form of this word? We don’t pronounce it in the “standard” way in Nineveh so I’m not sure I should add our plural form either Shuraya (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Yeah we pronounce it the same in Urmian aswell, niqva actually means hole in standard but oh well ahaha Antonklroberts (talk) 23:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:ܢܩܒܬܐ


text:
Eigentumsdelikt

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  property crime

title: Eigentumsdelikt


text: Offizialdeliktes

title: Offizialdeliktes


text: Offizialdelikts

title: Offizialdelikts


text: Offizialdelikte

title: Offizialdelikte


text: Template:mns-nor-adj

title: Template:mns-nor-adj


text:
білокрилка

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  whitefly

title: білокрилка


text: білокрилки

title: білокрилки


text: білокрилок

title: білокрилок


text: تؤکمک

title: تؤکمک


text:
eriwo

Etymology
Proposed to be derived from, , from , , ultimately from ,. Cognate with 🇨🇬. The compounding of the suffix "ɣo" (later "wo") is possibly an Proto-Edekiri innovation still maintained in a majority of Edekiri languages, and the non-suffixed version likely existed side by side. However, 🇨🇬 may suggest it is a remnant of an older root. See potential non-Yoruboid cognates, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, possibly 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, perhaps ultimately from or ,

Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) head
 * 2) top, leader

title: eriwo


text:
Verbrechensbekämpfung

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fight against crime

title: Verbrechensbekämpfung


text: Tjotahejtis

title: Tjotahejtis


text: Tjotaheitis

title: Tjotaheitis


text:
ürtmək

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to cover
 * 2) to lock, lock up

title: ürtmək


text: اۆرتمک

title: اۆرتمک


text: testamenterat

title: testamenterat


text: testamenterade

title: testamenterade


text: testamenterande

title: testamenterande


text: testamenterad

title: testamenterad


text: testamenteras

title: testamenteras


text: testamenterats

title: testamenterats


text: testamenterades

title: testamenterades


text: laurbeamum

title: laurbeamum


text: laurbeama

title: laurbeama


text: laurbeamas

title: laurbeamas


text: laurbeame

title: laurbeame


text: laurbeames

title: laurbeames


text: elebeamum

title: elebeamum


text:
білокрилий

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) white-winged

title: білокрилий


text: elebeama

title: elebeama


text: elebeamas

title: elebeamas


text: elebeame

title: elebeame


text:
س ل س

Etymology
.

Root

 * 1) related to slickness

title: س ل س


text: elebeames

title: elebeames


text:
desinfektera

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) disinfect

title: desinfektera


text: desinfekterar

title: desinfekterar


text: desinfekterat

title: desinfekterat


text: desinfekterade

title: desinfekterade


text: desinfekterande

title: desinfekterande


text: desinfekterad

title: desinfekterad


text: desinfekteras

title: desinfekteras


text: desinfekterats

title: desinfekterats


text: desinfekterades

title: desinfekterades


text: hrofstanum

title: hrofstanum


text: hrofstana

title: hrofstana


text: hrofstanas

title: hrofstanas


text: hrofstanes

title: hrofstanes


text: hrofstane

title: hrofstane


text: mersclandum

title: mersclandum


text: mersclanda

title: mersclanda


text: mersclandes

title: mersclandes


text: mersclande

title: mersclande


text:
dzɛ

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to eat, to consume
 * 2) to trick
 * 3) to kill with sorcery
 * 4) to cheat, to swear
 * 5) to be used, to be made out of
 * 1) to cheat, to swear
 * 2) to be used, to be made out of

title: dzɛ


text: beowyrtum

title: beowyrtum


text: beowyrta

title: beowyrta


title: Template:R:os:Joki:1962


text: beowyrte

title: beowyrte


text:
diskontera

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  discount

title: diskontera


text: diskonterar

title: diskonterar


text: diskonterat

title: diskonterat


text: diskonterade

title: diskonterade


text: diskonterande

title: diskonterande


text: diskonterad

title: diskonterad


text: diskonteras

title: diskonteras


text: diskonterats

title: diskonterats


text: diskonterades

title: diskonterades


text:
giljotinera

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) guillotine

title: giljotinera


text: giljotinerar

title: giljotinerar


text: giljotinerat

title: giljotinerat


text: giljotinerade

title: giljotinerade


text: giljotinerande

title: giljotinerande


text: giljotinerad

title: giljotinerad


text: giljotineras

title: giljotineras


text: giljotinerats

title: giljotinerats


text: giljotinerades

title: giljotinerades


text:
vozen

Etymology
From /  (Rotwelsch), apparently related to or derived from.

Verb

 * 1)  to perform sexual acts, make love

title: vozen


text:
viezevozen

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to perform sexual acts, make love

title: viezevozen


text: cawelwyrmum

title: cawelwyrmum


text: cawelwyrma

title: cawelwyrma


text: cawelwyrmas

title: cawelwyrmas


text: cawelwyrmes

title: cawelwyrmes


text: cawelwyrme

title: cawelwyrme


text:
gevoos

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) making love

title: gevoos


text: Category:Ossetian terms derived from Proto-Permic


text: deawwyrmum

title: deawwyrmum


text: deawwyrma

title: deawwyrma


text: deawwyrmas

title: deawwyrmas


text: deawwyrme

title: deawwyrme


text: deawwyrmes

title: deawwyrmes


text: fagwyrmum

title: fagwyrmum


text: fagwyrma

title: fagwyrma


text: fagwyrmas

title: fagwyrmas


text: fagwyrme

title: fagwyrme


text:
injicera

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  inject

title: injicera


text: fagwyrmes

title: fagwyrmes


text: injicerar

title: injicerar


text: injicerat

title: injicerat


text: injicerade

title: injicerade


text: injicerande

title: injicerande


text: injicerad

title: injicerad


text: Category:Old Georgian terms derived from Proto-Permic


text: injiceras

title: injiceras


text: injicerats

title: injicerats


text: injicerades

title: injicerades


text: Category:Old Georgian terms derived from Permic languages


text: ficwyrmum

title: ficwyrmum


text: ficwyrma

title: ficwyrma


text: ficwyrmas

title: ficwyrmas


text: Category:Old Georgian terms derived from Uralic languages


text: ficwyrme

title: ficwyrme


text: ficwyrmes

title: ficwyrmes


text:
śrzedni

Etymology
. ..

Adjective

 * 1) middle
 * 2) average
 * 1) average

title: śrzedni


text: leafwyrmum

title: leafwyrmum


text: leafwyrma

title: leafwyrma


text: leafwyrmas

title: leafwyrmas


text: leafwyrme

title: leafwyrme


text: leafwyrmes

title: leafwyrmes


text: moldwyrmum

title: moldwyrmum


text: moldwyrma

title: moldwyrma


text: moldwyrmas

title: moldwyrmas


text: moldwyrme

title: moldwyrme


text: moldwyrmes

title: moldwyrmes


text: weorcstanum

title: weorcstanum


text: weorcstana

title: weorcstana


text: weorcstanas

title: weorcstanas


text: Echlin

title: Echlin


text: weorcstane

title: weorcstane


text: weorcstanes

title: weorcstanes


text: feohlandum

title: feohlandum


text: feohlanda

title: feohlanda


text: feohlande

title: feohlande


text: feohlandes

title: feohlandes


text:
cắt bao

Etymology
🇰🇲,

Verb

 * 1) to circumcise, to cut the foreskin of the penis

title: cắt bao


text: mearclandum

title: mearclandum


text: mearclanda

title: mearclanda


text: mearclande

title: mearclande


text: mearclandes

title: mearclandes


text: muntlandum

title: muntlandum


text: muntlanda

title: muntlanda


text: muntlande

title: muntlande


text: muntlandes

title: muntlandes


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/tъpъtati

Etymology
From

Verb

 * 1) to stomp, to tramp

Descendants

 * East Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/tъpъtati


text: feldlandum

title: feldlandum


text: feldlanda

title: feldlanda


text: feldlandes

title: feldlandes


text: feldlande

title: feldlande


text: linlandum

title: linlandum


text: linlanda

title: linlanda


text: linlande

title: linlande


text: linlandes

title: linlandes


text:
responderen

Etymology
From. .

Verb

 * 1)  to respond

title: responderen


text: atlandum

title: atlandum


text: atlanda

title: atlanda


text: atlande

title: atlande


text: atlandes

title: atlandes


text: mæstlandum

title: mæstlandum


text: mæstlanda

title: mæstlanda


text: mæstlande

title: mæstlande


text: mæstlandes

title: mæstlandes


text: eletreowum

title: eletreowum


text:
śrzoda

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1)  Wednesday

title: śrzoda


text: eletreowa

title: eletreowa


text: eletreowe

title: eletreowe


text: eletreowes

title: eletreowes


text: actreowum

title: actreowum


text: actreowa

title: actreowa


text: actreowe

title: actreowe


text:
Vorbestellung

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) pre-order

title: Vorbestellung


text: actreowes

title: actreowes


text:
Template:mns-nor-adj/documentation

This template was created to ease the creation of entries for Northern Mansi adjectives

Usage
If the adjective is comparable; If the adjective is not comparable;
 * Put both parameters of the template as + : +
 * Put the first parameter as - : -

title: Template:mns-nor-adj/documentation


text: Beurteilen

title: Beurteilen


text:
Beurteiler

Etymology
From.

title: Beurteiler


text:
veârr

Etymology
Borrowed from from.

Noun

 * 1) faith

title: veârr


text:
Verurteiler

Etymology
From.

title: Verurteiler


text:
suga röv

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to suck ass (be very bad or unpleasant)

title: suga röv


text: suger röv

title: suger röv


text: sög röv

title: sög röv


text: sugit röv

title: sugit röv


text:
Urteiler

Etymology
From.

title: Urteiler


text: sug röv

title: sug röv


text: rövsugande

title: rövsugande


text:
い-adjective

Etymology
+.

Noun

 * 1)  An adjective that ends in  in its imperfective positive form.

title: い-adjective


text: い-adjectives

title: い-adjectives


text: Category:English terms spelled with い

title: Category:English terms spelled with い


text: Category:Terms spelled with い by language


text:
ışgın

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  sorrel
 * 1)  sorrel
 * 1)  sorrel

title: ışgın


text:
اوشقون

Etymology
, a borrowing from (whence 🇨🇬), longer ,

Noun

 * 1) sorrel ( and )
 * 1) sorrel ( and )
 * 1) sorrel ( and )

title: اوشقون


text: ییک

title: ییک


text: ایشقین

title: ایشقین


text: اشقین

title: اشقین


text: syrtin

title: syrtin


text:
akooya

Etymology
Sense 1 is a, reananalysing as the plural of. Sense 2 is from

Noun

 * 1) strand of body hair
 * : small feather

title: akooya


text: bites of the reality sandwich

title: bites of the reality sandwich


text:
قبماق

Etymology 1
.

Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Verb
(third-person singular aorist قَبارْ)

 * 1)  to grasp, catch, snatch, sieze

Etymology 2
.

Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb
(third-person singular aorist قُبارْ)

 * 1)  to rise up, stand up

title: قبماق


text:
דעמאָקראַטיזירן

Verb

 * 1) to democratize

title: דעמאָקראַטיזירן


text:
اوورتور

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  overture

title: اوورتور


text: Category:Turkish female given names from Latin


text: Category:Turkish given names from Latin

title: Category:Turkish given names from Latin


text:
under construction

Prepositional phrase

 * 1)  Being currently constructed.

Translations

 * Finnish:

title: under construction


text:
präkkää

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to crackle

title: präkkää


text:
جيژ

Etymology
.

Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) nail
 * 2) rivet on a breastplate

title: جيژ


text: asbestosen

title: asbestosen


text: Category:xqa:Armor

title: Category:xqa:Armor


text: asbestosens

title: asbestosens


text: fastens down

title: fastens down


text: fastening down

title: fastening down


text: fastened down

title: fastened down


text:
pneumokonios

Noun

 * 1)  pneumoconiosis

title: pneumokonios


text: pneumokoniosen

title: pneumokoniosen


text: pneumokoniosens

title: pneumokoniosens


text:
User:AlwynKruger

Contributor to Wiktionary

title: User:AlwynKruger


text:
dammlunga

Noun

 * 1)  pneumoconiosis
 * 2) a lung affected by pneumoconiosis
 * 1) a lung affected by pneumoconiosis

title: dammlunga


text:
uvertüra

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1)  overture

title: uvertüra


text: dammlungan

title: dammlungan


text: dammlungas

title: dammlungas


text:
Xuất Ê-díp-tô Ký

Etymology
Due to the uncanny resemblance, as well as the peculiarly Japanese-sounding name for Egypt, perhaps. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬. Most proper names in the Vietnamese Protestant translation of the Bible were derived from French, however, the French title seems implausible here since  only biblically implies "departure from Egypt", compared to the Catholic title  which is more general. Ê-díp-tô could also be from Portuguese "Egito", as there are many Catholic transliterations from Portuguese, for example, 基移吹蘇 Kirixitô for Portuguese rendition of Christ 'Christo' in Catholic chữ Nôm texts.

title: Xuất Ê-díp-tô Ký


text: dammlungans

title: dammlungans


text:
uvertyura

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1)  overture

title: uvertyura


text:
Xuất hành

Etymology
.

title: Xuất hành


text:
bun ribe

Etymology
lit. 'base of a hair'

Noun

 * 1) carbuncle

title: bun ribe


text:
otsatoin

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) endless

title: otsatoin


text:
otsattomast

Etymology 1
From.

Adverb

 * 1) endlessly

title: otsattomast


text:
топлийка

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) sewing pin

title: топлийка


text:
ουβερτούρα

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  overture

title: ουβερτούρα


text:
swoon set

Noun

 * 1)  Teenage girls.

title: swoon set


text:
silikos

Noun

 * 1)  silicosis

title: silikos


text: silikosen

title: silikosen


text: silikosens

title: silikosens


text:
estano

Etymology
From, from , , of origin, probably from.

Noun

 * 1) tin

title: estano


text:
uwertýura

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1)  overture

title: uwertýura


text:
ouvertyr

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  an overture
 * 2)  an overture (beginning, onset)

title: ouvertyr


text: lummiin

title: lummiin


text:
kaparring

Noun

 * 1) A wooden-soled sandal worn by Malays in South Africa.
 * 2) * 1972, Jan Juta, Background in Sunshine: Memories of South Africa (page 195)
 * kaparrings or wooden sandals on their delicate brown feet.
 * 1) * 1972, Jan Juta, Background in Sunshine: Memories of South Africa (page 195)
 * kaparrings or wooden sandals on their delicate brown feet.

title: kaparring


text: kaparrings

title: kaparrings


title: Template:R:fa:Aitchison:1891


text:
stendamm

Noun

 * 1) rock dust

Noun

 * 1) a rock dam (dam made of rock(s))

title: stendamm


text: stendammet

title: stendammet


text: stendamms

title: stendamms


text: stendammets

title: stendammets


text:
увертира

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  overture
 * 2)  overture, prologue

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  overture

title: увертира


text:
Swoonatra

Etymology
, in reference to his infatuated fandom.

Proper noun

 * 1)   (1915–1998), American singer and actor.

title: Swoonatra


text: stendammen

title: stendammen


text:
uvertira

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  overture

title: uvertira


text: stendammar

title: stendammar


text: stendammarna

title: stendammarna


text: stendammens

title: stendammens


text: stendammars

title: stendammars


text:
Sinatraesque

Adjective

 * 1) Reminiscent of  (1915–1998), American singer, actor, director, and producer.

title: Sinatraesque


text: stendammarnas

title: stendammarnas


text:
gesturalist

Noun

 * 1)  One who believes that language developed from gestures.

title: gesturalist


text: gesturalists

title: gesturalists


text: ouvertyren

title: ouvertyren


text: ouvertyrer

title: ouvertyrer


text: ouvertyrerna

title: ouvertyrerna


text: ouvertyrs

title: ouvertyrs


text: ouvertyrens

title: ouvertyrens


text: ouvertyrers

title: ouvertyrers


text: ouvertyrernas

title: ouvertyrernas


text:
Abyssinianness

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  The quality of being Abyssinian.

title: Abyssinianness


text: shameeana

title: shameeana


text: shameeanas

title: shameeanas


text: uvertyr

title: uvertyr


text: uvertyren

title: uvertyren


text: uvertyrer

title: uvertyrer


text: uvertyrerna

title: uvertyrerna


text: shameanah

title: shameanah


text:
ચિનાબ

Etymology
, from.

title: ચિનાબ


text: shameanahs

title: shameanahs


text: uvertyrs

title: uvertyrs


text: uvertyrens

title: uvertyrens


text: uvertyrers

title: uvertyrers


text: uvertyrernas

title: uvertyrernas


text: Peiching

title: Peiching


text:
เชิญทานครับ

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Phrase

 * 1) bon appétit!, enjoy your meal!
 * °N, °W

title: เชิญทานครับ


text:
เชิญทานค่ะ

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Phrase

 * 1) bon appétit!, enjoy your meal!
 * °N, °W

title: เชิญทานค่ะ


text:
攝護腺炎

Noun

 * 1)  prostatitis

title: 攝護腺炎


text: 摄护腺炎

title: 摄护腺炎


text: J antenna

title: J antenna


text: J antennas

title: J antennas


text:
J-pole antenna

Etymology
From its shape, like the letter J.

Noun

 * 1) A vertical omnidirectional transmitting antenna used in the shortwave frequency bands.

title: J-pole antenna


text:
જેલમ

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬,

title: જેલમ


text:
User:Quercus solaris/sets

Preamble

 * Sketches of filtered sets: hypernymous ontologic nodes (noun phrases or open compound nouns) and their contrast sets of cohyponyms, plus related terms, see also (cf), and so on
 * To an extent, the existing population of Wikipedian categories is on about this same set of meta-themes
 * The potential population is vast (almost unimaginably so); the gaps remain legion (quite understandably so); nonetheless, humans haven't done any better anywhere else, excepting certain KRR efforts, some of which are behind walls of various types and heights (some walls are higher than others; some walls are thicker than others; some walls are pricier than others)
 * Boosters keep threatening that generative AI is about three seconds away from solving this problem more thoroughly than humans themselves have managed (or can manage) to solve it; from some viewpoints, it seems like they're correct (about the imminence); but my gut keeps nagging that a truly whole-assed version of an AI solution is probably not yet as close as they imagine. Just imagine if my gut is wrong about that. Strangely, either way (yes or no), a lot of humans are in for a lot of surprise, in one way or another.
 * The root of the rub is that the chatbot layer itself is fundamentally stupid and insane, no matter how well it collocates the bits and pieces that make up its word salad. We're told that "sometime soon", other AI layers (or AI-ish layers) that are more about KRR will be layered over the insanely stupid layer to provide noninsane/nonstupid ontology. The reason I have so much doubt about the claims is a combination of (1) "if that's so straightforward then why hasn't it been done yet, or at least fairly started" plus (2) the queasy realization that apparently half or more of humans don't even understand the difference anyway — they seem to genuinely have no clue about, and possibly no ability to conceive mentally at all, the qualitative epistemic difference between "human liars who might be bullshitting or scamming" and "chatbots spewing confabulations at orders of magnitude higher volume." That difference is roughly the difference between a mere pepper mill and Why the Sea is Salt, but they apparently have no mental capacity for conceiving that difference? I don't know, I'm just reacting to the evidence that I've seen so far. If we're lucky, I've misunderstood what I've seen so far, and later the mechanism of misunderstanding will become clearer.
 * One thing about the potential setups and schemas is that a queryable database is a relevant model, and one would like to ask and refine iteratively. And that's a party trick that generative AI is getting pretty good at (iterative prompt engineering, where the machine remembers and understands the preceding context/state). You know those things with the kajiggers on them? Yes. How many kinds of those are the ones with purple kajiggers specifically? Here is a list. Are you sure you aren't just [the functional equivalent of] high on LSD? Yes. Did you remember to include mauve kajiggers too? Here is a revised list where the purple category is understood to subsume the mauve category. Which ones of these are commercially available in my region? Here is a list. How many of those are under 200 bucks? Here is a list. Remember that guy who was working on developing a yellow kajigger? Yes. His name is X Mc-Xerson. What's he up to these days? Here is a list of his most recent publications. Do you think we'll ever have blue kajiggers? The quest for blue kajiggers is ongoing. Here is a list of recent publications.
 * Handwave etc
 * It occurs to me that senseid is obviously one key piece of the overall puzzle. A sense is often such a combinatorial as is discussed above (a combinatorial hypernymic node), and it can have sensewise relations (e.g, syn, cot, hyper, hypo, mer, hol, rel, also; the last two must be at their own section, but they can have sense labels, which ties back to senseid anyway, so still good to go). At moments this might almost seem like the whole picture, except for one obvious limitation: you can't have any senses or senseids if you don't have a headword to put them under, and you can't have a headword unless it meets CFI. This is an interesting constraint of the medium, like painting without a full color palette perhaps (I'll have to keep sniffing at that analogy, in a nonolfactory way). From here (given this limitation), go to the other ideas about combinatorial hypernymic nodes elsewhere herein.
 * Related instance: utterance or vocalization as hypernymic node (e.g., Thesaurus:utter); a cardinal first level of cohyponymous nodes below that is melodious or harmonious utterance or vocalization (e.g., Thesaurus:sing, Thesaurus:hum) versus nonmelodious or nonharmonious utterance or vocalization (e.g., Thesaurus:speak, Thesaurus:talk, Thesaurus:shout, Thesaurus:murmur)
 * sonic emission is the hypernymic grandparent above utterance or vocalization (i.e., generation from nonhuman or human source); cardinal contrast sets at that level include (1) nonhuman versus human; (2) nonhuman-and-nonhumanoid versus human-or-humanoid; (3) animalian-including-human versus nonanimalian (with either of those subsuming humanoid, depending on a value judgment or viewpoint); nonsentient versus sentient (but you'd have to choose where you'd put pseudosentient in that dichotomization, which is analogous to nonhuman-but-humanoid vs nonhuman-and-nonhumanoid)
 * Some other spaces that are not irrelevant to this exploration include Categorization and Appendix:Roget's thesaurus classification.

What-if daydreams
These are things that perhaps will never happen at Wiktionary, but imagine for a moment if they happened at some Wiktionarylike place? Not so much a fork as a spork or tritensil·ʷᵖ. Not all forks are contentious; one of the points of CC licenses is cordial remixability. And (speaking of utensils) as long as we're mixing cordials and cocktails, don't forget your swizzler.

 * Imagine a dictionary with a 'Not to be confused with' subhead. Such a thing could sometimes be useful to EFL learners.
 * What if any adjective could have a subsection for "cardinal things that are often describable with this adjective"? (Collapsible of course; collapsed by default per a setting; could not must) (e.g., spoonlike > ladle)
 * What if any adjective could have a subsection for "other [semi-cardinal] things that are sometimes describable with this adjective"?
 * Obviously there are cutoff values for relevance; which leaves …
 * What if any adjective could have a subsection for "anything else that is potentially describable with this adjective"?
 * … which admittedly is a dog's breakfast not to be examined by humans unless they are digging for something, but …
 * what if you had a fleet of a million AI bots that could aggregate such things in the background?
 * What if there were a dedicated method of recognition for cardinal coinstantiations that are highly relevant Venn overlaps albeit not synonymous or hyponymous, but are recognizably cohyponymous beneath some hypernymous node of noun phrase that is substantively akin to a Wikipedian category?
 * One relevant semantic distinction that Thesaurus already formally recognizes is the distinction between hyponym and instance. It is but one small step further to formally recognize cardinal coinstantiations that are highly relevant Venn overlaps albeit not synonymous or hyponymous, but are recognizably cohyponymous beneath some hypernymous node of noun phrase that is substantively akin to a Wikipedian category (e.g., interrogatee > arrestee, detainee, suspect). If Wiktionary does not care to do so, there is room in the world for something else Wiktionarylike to do so. In fact Wikipedian categories already almost are that thing (even now), but there is a certain tightness missing that a more Wiktionarylike thing could backfill.
 * Note that earlier thesauri have lumped these things into the same lump as syn or ana (aka near-syn). One of the themes that was an original thrust of Thesaurus was to do one better (or several better) than they had done, making due use of the digital medium to its full advantage. This is just a case in point.
 * What if any word's coordinate terms section could be branched into subsections with a label for each subcategory, such as sense labels, combinatorial labels such as "things that are a type of X and have traits Y and/or Z", and so on, with each of those divisible into subsubsections for "cardinal or archetypal subset", "logically comprehensive subset" [of less use to humans but not zero], and handwave etc?
 * What if you built a dictionary that was dead serious about simply and explicitly labeling the vertical polysemy subclass of polysemy (i.e., the autohyponymy subclass)? (The difference is [total] Venn subsumption versus Venn overlap.) Traditional lexicographic methods include the distinction between a sense and a subsense, which is nicely labeled in most competent dictionaries (e.g., "1a" or "1.1", subordination indention), and this method goes a long way (i.e., most of the way) toward handling the whole aspect; still, one function that its form, by convention, cannot do, is illustrate this relationship without putting the (auto-)hypernymous sense (the wider one) first (i.e., giving it first-listed position). But sometimes the (auto-)hyponymous sense (the preciser one) wants to be first-listed (i.e., when it is the primary sense, as ranked by importance, being most common in use, or both, where importance can include a component whereby precision lends weighting). An example is cow versus cow, whereas some cows are cower than others, according to the silly way that we humans are neurally predisposed to talk. (In fairness, it's not the predisposition per se that is silly, but rather the prevailing degree of incapability to override it.) There are potential ways to mark/flag/tag this aspect in a way that is not list-position-dependent and would not be difficult to do, explain, or understand (for either writer or reader). I say this granting sight and touch as senses with which to convey the labeling; not so much hearing (that one's not at all impossible, but I don't see easiness or intuitiveness for it). The sighted ones include shading conventions and icons. The touch ones (considered especially, but not at all exclusively, for nonsighted readers) might include several shaping conventions that suggest themselves readily enough. The latter class would be quite useful in AR forms, for both sighted and nonsighted users (you don't have to be sightless to appreciate eyelessness, in a non-eyeless way). Enough for now. (If you want a flying car, you have to build it yourself, as the rest of these clowns, even the KRR postgrad ones, tend to talk big and perform small.)

Cells > blood cells

 * See blood cell § Hyponyms
 * Note: There is also the distinction (to be handled better eventually) of (1) practical subset RBC+PLT+WBC versus (2) "everything else" hematopoietically speaking (e.g., e.g., e.g.); return to this; again this comes down to the human mind's "practical" and "archetypal" groupings versus the set of all etically relevant groupings

Drug classes > currently clinically relevant members

 * See handwave etc
 * See w:Category:Drugs and its subcategories

Mechanics > diesel mechanics > pet peeves > customer-originated

 * "It bugs me when they do that", where they = X
 * Go

Mechanics > diesel mechanics > pet peeves > engineer-originated

 * "It bugs me when they do that", where they = Y
 * Go

Quantities > practical > abstract > stuff

 * See Thesaurus:lot

title: User:Quercus solaris/sets


text:
Cymri

Proper noun

 * 1) The,.

title: Cymri


text:
User talk:46.222.9.31

Welcome Message
-- Apisite (talk) 22:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:46.222.9.31


text:
discriminación positiva

Noun

 * 1) affirmative action

title: discriminación positiva


text:
pontocaine

Etymology
Originally a trade name.

title: pontocaine


text:
apothesine

Noun

 * 1) A particular anesthetic drug.

title: apothesine


text: dammlungor

title: dammlungor


text:
User talk:Lta3647

Welcome Message
-- Apisite (talk) 22:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lta3647


text: dammlungorna

title: dammlungorna


text: dammlungors

title: dammlungors


text: dammlungornas

title: dammlungornas


text:
contondre

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to hit; to give blows
 * 2)  to produce contusions; bruise
 * 3)  to grind with a mortar

title: contondre


text:
Hornbostel-Sachs

Etymology
Devised by Erich Moritz von Hornbostel and Curt Sachs.

Proper noun

 * 1)  A system of musical instrument classification based on the nature of the sound-producing material.

title: Hornbostel-Sachs


text: Sachs-Hornbostel

title: Sachs-Hornbostel


text:
stendammslunga

Noun

 * 1)  silicosis
 * 2) a lung affected by silicosis
 * 1) a lung affected by silicosis

title: stendammslunga


text: stendammslungan

title: stendammslungan


text: stendammslungor

title: stendammslungor


text: stendammslungorna

title: stendammslungorna


text: stendammslungas

title: stendammslungas


text: stendammslungans

title: stendammslungans


text: stendammslungors

title: stendammslungors


text: stendammslungornas

title: stendammslungornas


text:
奧斯曼土耳其語

Noun

 * 1) Ottoman Turkish

title: 奧斯曼土耳其語


text: 奥斯曼土耳其语

title: 奥斯曼土耳其语


text:
オスマン語

Noun

 * 1) Ottoman Turkish

title: オスマン語


text:
ڪوٽ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) a fort, fortress
 * 2)  a coat card
 * 1)  a coat card

title: ڪوٽ


text:
coenopterid

Noun

 * 1)  A fern of the Coenopteridale order, which is a taxon that is no longer used, but which used to represent ferns from the Devonian period into the Permian.

title: coenopterid


text: coenopterids

title: coenopterids


text:
cladoxylalean

Noun

 * 1)  A plant of the genus.

title: cladoxylalean


text: cladoxylaleans

title: cladoxylaleans


text:
Nungarin

Proper noun

 * 1) The, , with its headquarters in the town.
 * 1) The, , with its headquarters in the town.

title: Nungarin


text: Category:Seri articles

title: Category:Seri articles


text: Category:Seri determiners

title: Category:Seri determiners


text:
יגה

Verb

 * 1) suffer, grief, torment

title: יגה


text:
parón FIFA

Noun

 * 1)  international break

title: parón FIFA


text:
monstro do lago Ness

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Loch Ness monster

title: monstro do lago Ness


text: geeked up

title: geeked up


text:
ทานให้อร่อยนะ

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Phrase

 * 1) bon appétit!, enjoy your meal!

title: ทานให้อร่อยนะ


text:
himiki

Adjective

 * 1) chemical

title: himiki


text:
ponginess

Noun

 * 1) The state or condition of being pongy.

title: ponginess


text:
yeh yeh

Noun

 * 1) Malay rock and roll music.

title: yeh yeh


text:
Kinntaaf

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  child baptism

title: Kinntaaf


text:
möjek

Noun

 * 1) wolf
 * 2) insect
 * 1) insect

title: möjek


text:
Gesamtergebnis

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  aggregate the total score in a set of games between teams or competitors, usually the combination of the home and away scores

title: Gesamtergebnis


text:
Kirksr

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  cork bottle stopper, usually but necessarily made of cork

title: Kirksr


text: Kirng

title: Kirng


text:
Kirngchor

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  church choir

title: Kirngchor


text:
Talk:ܚܓܐ

Root
Question, i have been under the impression that khigga is from the root H-w-g because its related to going around a circle like the word khoghta (dial, circle). Just thought I'd check. Antonklroberts (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Yes, I think this is right, there’s another root ܚܓܓ that seems to be related Shuraya (talk) 07:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:ܚܓܐ


text: ܠܣܘܛܘ

title: ܠܣܘܛܘ


text:
ܡܘܙܡܒܝܩ

Etymology
from.

title: ܡܘܙܡܒܝܩ


text:
kissn

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to kiss

title: kissn


text:
ܙܝܡܒܒܘܐ

Etymology
.

title: ܙܝܡܒܒܘܐ


text:
Kissn

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  cushion; pillow bag filled with soft material used to sit or rest one’s head on

title: Kissn


text:
kâkul

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) head of hair
 * 2) braid, pigtail, ponytail
 * 3) tuft (of hair)

title: kâkul


text:
ܒܘܬܨܘܢܐ

Etymology
.

title: ܒܘܬܨܘܢܐ


text:
ܐܣܘܬܝܢܝ

Etymology
.

title: ܐܣܘܬܝܢܝ


text:
kniefällig

Adverb

 * 1) genuflecting, on one's knees

title: kniefällig


text:
ܢܡܝܒܝܐ

Etymology 1
.

Etymology 2
From the above +.

Adjective

 * 1) Namibian of, from, or pertaining to Namibia

Noun

 * 1) Namibian A person from Namibia or of Namibian descent

title: ܢܡܝܒܝܐ


text:
اڱارو

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) Tuesday

title: اڱارو


text:
ܐܢܓܘܠܐ

Etymology
from.

title: ܐܢܓܘܠܐ


text:
с тех пор, как

Conjunction

 * 1) ; since

title: с тех пор, как


text:
Kistl

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  small box
 * 2)  computer, TV, radio (electronic device in general)

title: Kistl


text:
ܙܡܒܝܐ

Etymology
.

title: ܙܡܒܝܐ


text:
ܡܠܘܝ

Etymology
.

title: ܡܠܘܝ


text:
Kitschl

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  car

title: Kitschl


text:
សុភោជន

Etymology
.

Phrase

 * 1) bon appétit!, enjoy your meal!

title: សុភោជន


text:
Kittelahsche

Noun

 * 1)  weird, conspicuous clothing

title: Kittelahsche


text: klee

title: klee


text:
សុរ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) god, deity, angel

title: សុរ


text:
aşğırmaq

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to sneeze

title: aşğırmaq


text:
Klaabhuus

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  guest who does not want to leave

title: Klaabhuus


text:
ٻڌ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  Mercury
 * 2) Wednesday

title: ٻڌ


text:
សុរសភោជន

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) delicious food

Phrase

 * 1) bon appétit!, enjoy your meal!

title: សុរសភោជន


text:
aşğırma

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) sneeze

title: aşğırma


text: اشغؽرماق

title: اشغؽرماق


text:
Klaad

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  dress, gown kind of woman's garment

title: Klaad


text: اشغؽرما

title: اشغؽرما


text: stampet

title: stampet


text:
êsürmək

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to cough

title: êsürmək


text:
гнутися

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to bend
 * 2)  to bend
 * 1)  to bend

title: гнутися


text: stampets

title: stampets


text:
Klaadahsche

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  clothing

title: Klaadahsche


text: îesürmək

title: îesürmək


text:
Klaadrbiechl

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  coat hanger

title: Klaadrbiechl


text: stampens

title: stampens


text: Spirochaeta pallida

title: Spirochaeta pallida


text:
Klaadrhogn

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  coat peg, coathook, clothes hook

title: Klaadrhogn


text: Category:pt:Minecraft

title: Category:pt:Minecraft


text: Category:pt:Microsoft

title: Category:pt:Microsoft


text: stamparna

title: stamparna


text: stampars

title: stampars


text: stamparnas

title: stamparnas


text:
Klaakram

Etymology
Compare.

Noun

 * 1)  trivialities, trivial matters

title: Klaakram


text:
rococoed

Adjective

 * 1) Ornamented in a rococo style.

title: rococoed


text: pinbeamum

title: pinbeamum


text: pinbeama

title: pinbeama


text: pinbeamas

title: pinbeamas


text: pinbeame

title: pinbeame


text: pinbeames

title: pinbeames


text: acbeamum

title: acbeamum


text: acbeama

title: acbeama


text: acbeamas

title: acbeamas


text: acbeame

title: acbeame


text: acbeames

title: acbeames


text:
klaalaut

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1)  petty; abashed, sheepish, meek, quiet

title: klaalaut


text: pinhnutum

title: pinhnutum


text: pinhnuta

title: pinhnuta


text: pinhnyte

title: pinhnyte


text: eafiscum

title: eafiscum


text: eafisca

title: eafisca


text: eafiscas

title: eafiscas


text: eafisce

title: eafisce


text: eafisces

title: eafisces


text:
klaam

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to glue
 * 2)  to stick

title: klaam


text: eawyrtum

title: eawyrtum


text: eawyrta

title: eawyrta


text: eawyrte

title: eawyrte


text: eagwyrtum

title: eagwyrtum


text: eagwyrta

title: eagwyrta


text: eagwyrte

title: eagwyrte


text: eoforþrotan

title: eoforþrotan


text: eoforþrotena

title: eoforþrotena


text: eoforþrotum

title: eoforþrotum


text: acrindum

title: acrindum


text: acrinda

title: acrinda


text: acrinde

title: acrinde


text: banhringum

title: banhringum


text: banhringa

title: banhringa


text: banhringas

title: banhringas


text: hrætelwyrtum

title: hrætelwyrtum


text: spurs on

title: spurs on


text: hrætelwyrta

title: hrætelwyrta


text: spurring on

title: spurring on


text: hrætelwyrte

title: hrætelwyrte


text: spurred on

title: spurred on


text: gelodwyrtum

title: gelodwyrtum


text: gelodwyrta

title: gelodwyrta


text: gelodwyrte

title: gelodwyrte


text: hæselwyrte

title: hæselwyrte


text: hæselwyrta

title: hæselwyrta


text: hæselwyrtum

title: hæselwyrtum


text: ficwyrte

title: ficwyrte


text: ficwyrta

title: ficwyrta


text: ficwyrtum

title: ficwyrtum


text:
klamiestrt

Adjective

 * 1)  build amateurishly, makeshift

title: klamiestrt


text: feldmintum

title: feldmintum


text: feldmintena

title: feldmintena


text: feldmintan

title: feldmintan