text:
User:Amanyn

New to Wiktionary, would like to be a major Old Galician-Portuguese helper (once I get able to).

To Do
This is list is out of date, since I keep getting new ideas that I don't write here.
 * Turn the examples used in the Portuguese language 'neutral' — BP discussion
 * Help with Old Galician-Portuguese
 * Create missing entries
 * Create missing secondary entries (non-lemmas, feminine forms, etc.)
 * Add citations for secondary entries — BP discussion)
 * Add gender and plural (g=f|p for example) to entries
 * Make the examples resemble the manuscripts better
 * Add descendants that are missing (mostly Fala)
 * Create missing Fala secondary entries

Entries with quotations prior to 1500
User:MedK1/list/OldGPNeedsLemma

Northern Portuguese
Putting here some aspects where it differs from the default dialect and my thoughts about it since some stuff isn't in Wiktionary. It might be relative, since it's based of what I've noticed around me.

Things in which it is similar to Galician

 * Pronouncing home and "onte" instead of "homem" and "ontem" sometimes (Galician also drops final the "m" in "-em")
 * Natural pronounciation of também and ao (to a less extent) being tamém and ó ("tamém" being more close to Galician tamén, and "ó" also being a nonstandard form of "ao" in Galician)
 * Some speakers pronounce /ʒ/ and /z/ as /ʃ/ and /s/. Might not be related, but similar to how the phonemes evolved from OGP to Galician
 * Some vocabulary, such as anho ("lamb"), ervanço ("chickpea") and auga ("water")

Transmontan Portuguese

 * Pronouncing the ⟨s⟩ in, for example, "mas é" as /ʒ/ instead of /z/

Wikipedia

 * Galician phonology
 * Portuguese phonology

title: User:Amanyn


text:
sent-bon

Noun

 * 1)  perfume

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: sent-bon


text:
ceratocarpus

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1)  having horned fruits

Related terms
''

Etymology
New Latin; from.

Adjective

 * 1)  having horned fruits

title: ceratocarpus


text:
eonial

Etymology
From +, the former from  (whence also , ) +.

title: eonial


text: aquêle

title: aquêle


text: aeonial

title: aeonial


text: aionial

title: aionial


text: æonial

title: æonial


text:
вщухати

Etymology
. Possibly related to 🇨🇬. With suffix.

Verb

 * 1) to abate, to die down, to subside
 * 2) to quiet down

title: вщухати


text:
teannfhocal

Noun

 * 1) strong assertion

title: teannfhocal


text:
вщухнути

Etymology
. Possibly related to 🇨🇬. With suffix.

Verb

 * 1) to abate, to die down, to subside
 * 2) to quiet down

title: вщухнути


text:
libidinós

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) libidinous, lustful

title: libidinós


text: вщух

title: вщух


text:
vinare

Noun

 * 1)  a bottle of wine

title: vinare


text: vinaren

title: vinaren


text:
comhaois

Noun

 * 1) contemporary, peerperson roughly the same age as another
 * Tha sinn nar comhaoisean. - We are contemporaries.
 * Bha e na chomhaois rithe. - He was her contemporary.

title: comhaois


text: vinarna

title: vinarna


text: vinares

title: vinares


text: вщухла

title: вщухла


text:
a la primera

Adverb

 * 1) on the first try

title: a la primera


text: vinarens

title: vinarens


text: vinarnas

title: vinarnas


text: вщухло

title: вщухло


text: вщухли

title: вщухли


text: вщухне

title: вщухне


text: вщухнуть

title: вщухнуть


text: comhaoisean

title: comhaoisean


text: вщухлий

title: вщухлий


text:
была не была

Interjection

 * 1)  here goes, I can do this, screw it, what the hell, here we go, let's do this

title: была не была


text:
britký

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) incisive

title: britký


text: britkého

title: britkého


text:
nyfunnen

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) newfound

title: nyfunnen


text: Category:Ingrian terms suffixed with -nnella


text: britkému

title: britkému


text: nyfunnet

title: nyfunnet


text: nyfunna

title: nyfunna


text: nyfunne

title: nyfunne


text: britkým

title: britkým


text: britká

title: britká


text: britkej

title: britkej


text: britkú

title: britkú


text: britké

title: britké


text: britkých

title: britkých


text: britkou

title: britkou


text: britkými

title: britkými


text: britkí

title: britkí


text: durolged

title: durolged


text:
konvertit

Etymology
. Cognate of 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) convert person who has changed religion

title: konvertit


text: konvertiten

title: konvertiten


text: konvertiter

title: konvertiter


text: konvertiterna

title: konvertiterna


text: konvertits

title: konvertits


text: konvertitens

title: konvertitens


text: konvertiters

title: konvertiters


text: konvertiternas

title: konvertiternas


text:
mattogrossensis

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1)  of Mato Grosso

title: mattogrossensis


text: aithrib

title: aithrib


text:
groinfield

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1)  A series of groins rigid structure built perpendicularly along a waterway built alongside each other.

title: groinfield


text: groinfields

title: groinfields


text: groin field

title: groin field


text: groin fields

title: groin fields


text:
γλυφός

Adjective

 * 1) somewhat salty, brackish

title: γλυφός


text:
bradwr

Noun

 * 1) traitor, betrayer

title: bradwr


text: Verzäuner

title: Verzäuner


text: Umzäuner

title: Umzäuner


text: Melling-with-Wrayton

title: Melling-with-Wrayton


text:
扣打

Noun

 * 1)  quota; limit

title: 扣打


text:
broþorsciepe

Etymology
From, equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) brotherliness, (brotherly) kindness or love

title: broþorsciepe


text:
اجغوج

Noun

 * 1) key

title: اجغوج


text:
Monsoon Asia

Proper noun

 * 1) The region of Asia that experiences monsoons.
 * https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789087283902/monsoon-asia
 * https://haa.fas.harvard.edu/classes/haa-81-art-monsoon-asia-interconnected-histories
 * http://www.cornell.edu/video/sunil-amrith-monsoon-asia-past-future-imagination-of-a-region
 * https://lcluc.umd.edu/projects/land-use-ecosystem-climate-interactions-monsoon-asia
 * https://www.archdaily.com/999602/the-tropical-architecture-of-monsoon-asia
 * https://www.indigo.ca/en-ca/monsoon-asia-a-reader-on-south-and-southeast-asia/9789087283902.html
 * https://lcluc.umd.edu/projects/land-use-ecosystem-climate-interactions-monsoon-asia
 * https://www.archdaily.com/999602/the-tropical-architecture-of-monsoon-asia
 * https://www.indigo.ca/en-ca/monsoon-asia-a-reader-on-south-and-southeast-asia/9789087283902.html
 * https://www.archdaily.com/999602/the-tropical-architecture-of-monsoon-asia
 * https://www.indigo.ca/en-ca/monsoon-asia-a-reader-on-south-and-southeast-asia/9789087283902.html
 * https://www.indigo.ca/en-ca/monsoon-asia-a-reader-on-south-and-southeast-asia/9789087283902.html

title: Monsoon Asia


text: Wrayton

title: Wrayton


text:
white monkey

Noun

 * 1)  In China and other Asian countries, predominantly white foreigners or immigrants who are hired solely on the basis of their race, usually for work involving advertising such as modelling or acting.
 * 2) A Chinese tea produced from green tea leaves and buds harvested during the initial two weeks of the season.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 白猴子
 * Indonesian: monyet putih
 * Russian: белая обезьяна

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 白毛猴

title: white monkey


text: white monkeys

title: white monkeys


text:
folkrättsbrott

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  crime against the law of nations, crime against international law

title: folkrättsbrott


text: Citations:Sípàapuni

title: Citations:Sípàapuni


text: folkrättsbrottet

title: folkrättsbrottet


text: folkrättsbrotten

title: folkrättsbrotten


text: folkrättsbrotts

title: folkrättsbrotts


text: folkrättsbrottets

title: folkrättsbrottets


text: folkrättsbrottens

title: folkrättsbrottens


text: värnandet

title: värnandet


text: värnandes

title: värnandes


text: värnandets

title: värnandets


text:
τσιρλονέρι

Noun

 * 1) a spring whose water has purgative properties

title: τσιρλονέρι


text:
საერთაშორისო სამართალი

Noun

 * 1) international law

title: საერთაშორისო სამართალი


text:
საერთაშორისო ურთიერთობები

Noun

 * 1) international relations

title: საერთაშორისო ურთიერთობები


text: ურთიერთობები

title: ურთიერთობები


text: Citations:Awatovi

title: Citations:Awatovi


text:
pacifier gag

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A ball gag with a pacifier attached to its rubber or silicone sphere.

title: pacifier gag


text:
ბუნებითი სამართალი

Noun

 * 1)  natural law

title: ბუნებითი სამართალი


text: pacifier gags

title: pacifier gags


text:
ბუნების კანონი

Noun

 * 1) law of nature

title: ბუნების კანონი


text: Rosenstraußes

title: Rosenstraußes


text: Rosensträuße

title: Rosensträuße


text: Rosensträußchen

title: Rosensträußchen


text: Rosenstrauss

title: Rosenstrauss


text: Rosensträusschen

title: Rosensträusschen


text:
paci gag

Etymology
. Compare.

Noun

 * 1)  A pacifier gag.

title: paci gag


text: paci gags

title: paci gags


text:
Talk:Algernon

Pronunciation needed
Is the 'g' like German or girl? Ralph Corderoy (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Algernon


text:
Rosenstrauß

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bouquet of roses (bunch of roses)

title: Rosenstrauß


text:
人款

Verb

 * 1)  A type of person; people that are wont to chut pattern.

title: 人款


text: Nelkenstraußes

title: Nelkenstraußes


text: Nelkensträuße

title: Nelkensträuße


text: Nelkensträußchen

title: Nelkensträußchen


text: Nelkenstrauss

title: Nelkenstrauss


text: Nelkensträusschen

title: Nelkensträusschen


text:
Nelkenstrauß

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bouquet of carnations (bunch of carnations)

title: Nelkenstrauß


text: Citations:Yayaponcha

title: Citations:Yayaponcha


text:
útrýming

Noun

 * 1) eradication, extinction

title: útrýming


text:
kelew

Etymology
From.

Pronoun

 * 1) second person plural pronoun; you

title: kelew


text:
frontly

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) Towards or through the front of something; directly.

title: frontly


text:
Τσιρλονέρι

Etymology
Use as a proper name of.

Proper noun

 * 1) an ancient thermal spring, identified with the referent of the 🇨🇬, now under the, in Freattyda, Piraeus, Athens
 * 1) an ancient thermal spring, identified with the referent of the 🇨🇬, now under the, in Freattyda, Piraeus, Athens

title: Τσιρλονέρι


text:
oczajdusza

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  carouser, rake, reveller, varmint

Declension
Masculine declension:

Feminine declension:

title: oczajdusza


text:
pippifågel

Noun

 * 1)  a birdie (bird)

title: pippifågel


text: pippifågeln

title: pippifågeln


text:
shout fire in a crowded theater

Verb

 * 1)  To say something which is not protected by the First Amendment's right to freedom of speech because it would incite violence, panic or lawlessness.

title: shout fire in a crowded theater


text: pippifåglar

title: pippifåglar


text: pippifåglarna

title: pippifåglarna


text: pippifågels

title: pippifågels


text: pippifågelns

title: pippifågelns


text:
Andromedan galaksi

Proper noun

 * 1) Andromeda Galaxy

Declension

 * Plural forms are rare but can occur when talking about multiple different galaxies at the same time (e.g. ).

title: Andromedan galaksi


text: pippifåglars

title: pippifåglars


text: pippifåglarnas

title: pippifåglarnas


text: n-immarmus

title: n-immarmus


text:
glass child

Etymology
Popularized on TikTok in 2023.

Noun

 * 1)  A child who feels "invisible" to their parents due to having a sibling with a serious health condition or disability who occupies a disproportionate amount of their parents' attention.

title: glass child


text:
midwinterhoorn

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  midwinter horn, a type of wooden trumpet blown around midwinter in certain areas of the eastern Netherlands and the adjacent parts of Germany

title: midwinterhoorn


text:
Bahanna

Etymology
.

title: Bahanna


text: glass children

title: glass children


text: midwinterhoorns

title: midwinterhoorns


text: shouts fire in a crowded theater

title: shouts fire in a crowded theater


text:
शापमुक्ति

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1) release or liberation from a curse

title: शापमुक्ति


text: shouted fire in a crowded theater

title: shouted fire in a crowded theater


text: Category:sdh:Time

title: Category:sdh:Time


text:
shouting fire in a crowded theater

Noun

 * 1) The action of shouting "fire" in a crowded theater, literally or figuratively.

title: shouting fire in a crowded theater


text: Citations:Quatrième Monde

title: Citations:Quatrième Monde


text: Citations:Grand-Mère Araignée

title: Citations:Grand-Mère Araignée


text:
k'e-

Etymology
From.

Prefix

 * 1) your, second-person possessive prefix.
 * 2) you, second-person subject subjunctive prefix.

title: k'e-


text: Category:Seri reference templates

title: Category:Seri reference templates


text: Grand-Mère Araignée

title: Grand-Mère Araignée


text:
'ne-

Etymology
From.

Prefix

 * 1) my, our, first-person possessive prefix.
 * 2) I, we, first-person subject subjunctive prefix.

title: 'ne-


text:
又乜又七

Phrase

 * 1)  this and that

title: 又乜又七


text: Category:sei:Citrus subfamily plants

title: Category:sei:Citrus subfamily plants


text: Category:sei:Shrubs

title: Category:sei:Shrubs


text: Category:sei:Rue family plants

title: Category:sei:Rue family plants


text: Category:sei:Sapindales order plants

title: Category:sei:Sapindales order plants


text: Category:sei:Containers

title: Category:sei:Containers


text: Category:sei:Tools

title: Category:sei:Tools


text:
'we-

Etymology
From.

Prefix

 * 1) his, her, its, their third-person possessive prefix.
 * 2) he, she, it, they, third-person subject subjunctive prefix.

title: 'we-


text: Lilienstraußes

title: Lilienstraußes


text: Liliensträuße

title: Liliensträuße


text: Liliensträußchen

title: Liliensträußchen


text:
Weinstraße

Noun

 * 1)  wine route

title: Weinstraße


text: Lilienstrauss

title: Lilienstrauss


text: Liliensträusschen

title: Liliensträusschen


text:
Lilienstrauß

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bouquet of lilies (bunch of lily flowers)

title: Lilienstrauß


text: 'ue-

title: 'ue-


text:
Quatrième Monde

Etymology
.

Proper noun
le

title: Quatrième Monde


text: Category:fr:Cosmology

title: Category:fr:Cosmology


text:
booster pad

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A diaper insert, especially a large one in the shape of a pad that is typically used overnight or for adult incontinence.

title: booster pad


text: booster pads

title: booster pads


text:
sposie

Etymology
From, through clipping di[spos]able.

Noun

 * 1)  A disposable diaper.

title: sposie


text: sposies

title: sposies


text:
immarmus

Noun

 * "sga"
 * "sga"
 * "sga"

- Ní du ṡémigud pectha at·ber-som inso .i. combad dó fa·cherred: “ní sní cetid·deirgni ⁊ ní sní dud·rigni nammá”; acht is do chuingid dílguda dosom, amal du·rolged dïa aithrib íar n‑immarmus.

title: immarmus


text:
wine route

Noun

 * 1)  A marked and advertised road with special signs in a wine-producing region, used to promote local vineyards and other places of touristic interest.

Translations

 * French: route des vins
 * German:

title: wine route


text:
purpuraceous

Etymology
From +. Equivalent to.

Adjective

 * 1)  Purple-coloured.

title: purpuraceous


text: wine routes

title: wine routes


text:
menomen

Etymology
From reduplicated form of.

title: menomen


text: Category:sei:Children

title: Category:sei:Children


text: Category:sei:Youth

title: Category:sei:Youth


text:
purpurated

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1)  Clothed in purple (seen as indicating that one is wealthy or noble).

title: purpurated


text: Category:sei:Age

title: Category:sei:Age


text:
penkw

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) acorn flour

title: penkw


text:
purpurize

Etymology
From +. Equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  To make (something) purple-coloured.

title: purpurize


text: purpurized

title: purpurized


text: Citations:Sip-pa-pu

title: Citations:Sip-pa-pu


text:
förgreningsdosa

Noun

 * 1) a power strip

title: förgreningsdosa


text:
dar virote

Verb

 * 1)   to  (something); to  in (an activity)

title: dar virote


text: förgreningsdosan

title: förgreningsdosan


text:
Rada Ministrów

Etymology
lit. 'Council of Ministers'.

title: Rada Ministrów


text: förgreningsdosor

title: förgreningsdosor


text: förgreningsdosorna

title: förgreningsdosorna


text: förgreningsdosas

title: förgreningsdosas


text: förgreningsdosans

title: förgreningsdosans


text: förgreningsdosors

title: förgreningsdosors


text:
Category:Yurok uninflected verbs

Yurok verbs that do not take inflectional suffixes.

title: Category:Yurok uninflected verbs


text: förgreningsdosornas

title: förgreningsdosornas


text: Template:list:Chinese calendar months/za


text:
ndwengouj

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The ninth month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwengouj


text:
ყალბი ახალი ამბები

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) fake news

title: ყალბი ახალი ამბები


text:
ახალი ამბები

Noun

 * 1) news (current events reporting)

title: ახალი ამბები


text: ამბები

title: ამბები


text:
lepiej późno niż wcale

Etymology
lit. 'better late than not at all'.

Proverb

 * 1)  better late than never

title: lepiej późno niż wcale


text:
ndwencib

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The tenth month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwencib


text:
ndwenbet

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The eighth month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwenbet


text:
ყალბი ინფორმაცია

Etymology
, but only in part, with news replaced with information.

Noun

 * 1) fake news

title: ყალბი ინფორმაცია


text:
ndwencaet

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The seventh month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwencaet


text:
ndwenloeg

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The sixth month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwenloeg


text:
ndwenngux

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The fifth month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwenngux


text:
Wiktionary:About Namuyi

This page deals with the specific issues of Namuyi entries on Wiktionary.

Orthography
The orthography used follows the one in Pavlík (2017), but suppleted by information gathered by Li (2017). The following modifications have been made:
 * Tones are re-written according to the phonological analysis by Li (2017):
 * The sandhi allophones of the tonemes may be given in multisyllable IPA templates as â (IPA ˥), ă (IPA ˩˧) and á (IPA ˧˥)
 * The nasalised allophones  and  are written as simple  and , respectively.

title: Wiktionary:About Namuyi


text:
ndwenseiq

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The fourth month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwenseiq


text:
ndwensam

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The third month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwensam


text:
ndwenngeih

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The second month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwenngeih


text:
snap crotch

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) On an item of clothing, a snap fastener located at the crotch.

title: snap crotch


text: snap crotches

title: snap crotches


text:
დეზინფორმაცია

Noun

 * 1) disinformation

title: დეზინფორმაცია


text:
ndwencieng

Etymology
From 🇰🇲,.

Noun

 * 1) The first month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwencieng


text:
ცნობათა ბიურო

Noun

 * 1) information desk

title: ცნობათა ბიურო


text: Wiktionary:Word of the day/2023/December 21


text: death fat

title: death fat


text: basketballed

title: basketballed


text:
ndwen'it

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The eleventh month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwen'it


text:
🔛

Description
A two-sided arrow facing left and right with the text “on!” below (but see usage notes).

Symbol

 * 1)  On.


text: death fats

title: death fats


text:
Tytherington and Itchington

Proper noun

 * , which includes the named places.

Usage notes
The parish was renamed from Tytherington on 1 April 2023.

title: Tytherington and Itchington


text:
wohkelo'

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) pepperwood

title: wohkelo'


text:
bradychu

Verb

 * 1)  to betray, to deceive
 * 2)  to reveal unintentionally

title: bradychu


text: fag-bashes

title: fag-bashes


text: fag-bashing

title: fag-bashing


text:
ndwenlab

Etymology
From 🇰🇲,.

Noun

 * 1) The twelfth month of the Chinese lunar calendar.

title: ndwenlab


text: fag-bashed

title: fag-bashed


text: Category:za:Chinese months

title: Category:za:Chinese months


text:
bradychiad

Noun

 * 1) betrayal, treachery, deceit

title: bradychiad


text: güiste

title: güiste


text: güistes

title: güistes


text: güishtes

title: güishtes


text:
prezes Rady Ministrów

Etymology
lit. 'president of the Council Ministers'.

title: prezes Rady Ministrów


text: güishte

title: güishte


text: версіях

title: версіях


text:
werhlery

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tail

title: werhlery


text:
monkey spoon

Noun

 * 1)  A type of handmade ladle or spoon that was used to celebrate weddings and to honor those who passed away, primarily used by the Dutch settlers of the New York and Hudson River area and in the Netherlands.

title: monkey spoon


text: версіі

title: версіі


text: monkey spoons

title: monkey spoons


text:
nyī

Verb

 * 1)  to borrow

Verb

 * 1)  to steam

title: nyī


text: Category:za:Months

title: Category:za:Months


text: версії

title: версії


text: ἀποπλέων

title: ἀποπλέων


text: версій

title: версій


text:
minister bez teki

Etymology
lit. 'minister without portfolio'.

Noun

 * 1)  minister without portfolio

title: minister bez teki


text: ἀποπλέοντες

title: ἀποπλέοντες


text:
attrectatio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) touching

title: attrectatio


text:
Kuvi

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1) A Dravidian language spoken in the Indian state of Odisha.

Translations

 * Hindi: कूवि
 * Kannada:
 * Kuvi: କୁୱି
 * Malayalam: കുവി
 * Tamil:
 * Tulu: ಕುವಿ

title: Kuvi


text: Ἀνακτόριον

title: Ἀνακτόριον


text:
душогрижник

Noun

 * 1)  pastor
 * 2)  meddler

title: душогрижник


text: душогрижници

title: душогрижници


text: Itchington

title: Itchington


text:
crema sabaiona

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) zabaglione

title: crema sabaiona


text: User:Bogdan/NumeSchimbate

title: User:Bogdan/NumeSchimbate


text: версіями

title: версіями


text: версіям

title: версіям


text: Hinhalten

title: Hinhalten


text: καταστήσας

title: καταστήσας


text: καταστήσαντες

title: καταστήσαντες


text:
Pedralbes

Etymology
From.

title: Pedralbes


text:
വെള്ളമടിക്കുക

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to drink alcohol

title: വെള്ളമടിക്കുക


text: Feilhalten

title: Feilhalten


text:
प्रशम्

Etymology
From

Root

 * 1) to become calm or tranquil, to be pacified or soothed, to settle down (as dust)
 * 2) to be allayed or extinguished, cease, disappear, fade away
 * 1) to be allayed or extinguished, cease, disappear, fade away
 * 1) to be allayed or extinguished, cease, disappear, fade away

title: प्रशम्


text: feilhaltend

title: feilhaltend


text: feilgehalten

title: feilgehalten


text: Category:Ancient Greek terms suffixed with -ακόσιοι


text:
heterorromántico

Adjective

 * 1) heteroromantic

Noun

 * 1) heteroromantic

title: heterorromántico


text: heterorromántica

title: heterorromántica


text: heterorrománticos

title: heterorrománticos


text: heterorrománticas

title: heterorrománticas


text: Mithalten

title: Mithalten


text: प्रशाम्यति

title: प्रशाम्यति


text: Maßhalten

title: Maßhalten


text: Category:Sanskrit terms belonging to the root प्रशम्


text: Masshalten

title: Masshalten


text:
🚨

Description
Depiction of the revolving red lights of a police car.

Symbol

 * 1) Warning; danger; concern; a red flag.


text:
biť

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to beat (somebody)
 * 2) to beat (heart)
 * 3) to strike (clock)

title: biť


text: ප්‍රශාම්‍යති

title: ප්‍රශාම්‍යති


text: maßhaltend

title: maßhaltend


text:
Citations:Jewish flag

Noun: "flag design"

 * 1944 — anonymous, Hearings Before the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Seventy-Eighth Congress, Second Session, page 339
 * Jews in Palestine have appealed for the right to form a separate Jewish Army under a Jewish flag.
 * 2010 — Ronald L. Eisenberg, Jewish Traditions: A JPS Guide, page 577
 * The combination of blue and white as the colors of the Jewish flag was derived from an 1860 poem (“Judah's Colors”) by Austrian Ludwig August Frankl, which explained that the blue symbolized "the splendors of the firmament"
 * 2021 — Avinoam Patt, The Jewish Heroes of Warsaw: The Afterlife of the Revolt
 * As American Jews grappled with the questions of patriotism, Communism, and Zionism after the war, the blue Jewish flag would also be translated into dramatic representations of the Jewish struggle against oppression.

Noun: "bill"

 * 1921 — anonymous, , volume 28, numbers 1-3, page 129
 * Four Jewish flags I blow, four lovely bucks.

title: Citations:Jewish flag


text:
Mihaifalău

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Mihaifalău


text:
Talk:Jewish flag

wikiquote page
Jewish flag Arlo Barnes (talk) 20:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jewish flag


text:
ὀκτακόσιοι

Numeral

 * 1)  eight hundred

title: ὀκτακόσιοι


text: ὀκτακοσίους

title: ὀκτακοσίους


text: Тёрнер

title: Тёрнер


text: Template:RQ:Shadwell Timon

title: Template:RQ:Shadwell Timon


text:
הורטאָם

Etymology
Likely, which see. Related to 🇨🇬,, , and 🇨🇬.

Adverb

 * 1) wholesale, in bulk
 * 2) together
 * 1) together
 * 1) together

title: הורטאָם


text: ἀπέδοντο

title: ἀπέδοντο


text:
kükürtdioksit

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) sulfur dioxide

title: kükürtdioksit


text: 里维拉

title: 里维拉


text:
Sasnireș

Etymology
, from, from.

Proper noun

 * 1) . Renamed to Nireș.

title: Sasnireș


text:
Template:RQ:Shadwell Timon/documentation

Usage
This template may be used in Wiktionary entries to format quotations from 's work The History of Timon of Athens, the Man-hater (1st edition, 1678), based on 's work . It can be used to create a link to an online version of the work at the Internet Archive.

Parameters
The template takes the following parameters:

 * chapter – use this parameter to quote from the following parts of the work other than the play, as indicated in the first column of the following table:

 * As these chapters unpaginated, use 1 or page to specify the "page number" assigned by the Internet Archive to the URL of the webpage to be linked to. For example, if the URL is, specify 10.

 * 1 or page, or pages – mandatory: the page number(s) quoted from. If quoting a range of pages, note the following:
 * Separate the first and last page number of the range with an en dash, like this: 10–11.
 * You must also use pageref to indicate the page to be linked to (usually the page on which the Wiktionary entry appears).
 * This parameter must be specified to have the template determine the act number (I–V) quoted from, and to link to the online version of the work.

 * act – mandatory in some cases: in most cases, the template can determine the act number quoted from if the page number is specified. However, it is unable to do so if page 17, 35, 54, or 72 is specified, in which case this parameter must be used to specify the act number quoted from in uppercase Roman numerals, like this: I.

 * 2, text, or passage – the passage to be quoted.
 * footer – a comment on the passage quoted.
 * brackets – use on to surround a quotation with brackets. This indicates that the quotation either contains a mere mention of a term (for example, "some people find the word manoeuvre hard to spell") rather than an actual use of it (for example, "we need to manoeuvre carefully to avoid causing upset"), or does not provide an actual instance of a term but provides information about related terms.

Examples

 * Wikitext:
 * (the template can determine the act number quoted from); or
 * Result:
 * Result:


text:
વલ્લાહ

Etymology
, from.

Adverb

 * 1)  wallah

Interjection

 * 1)  wallah

title: વલ્લાહ


text:
Seplac

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Seplac


text:
Someșfalău

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Someșfalău


text:
પ્યારું

Etymology
, from.

Adjective

 * 1) darling, dear, beloved

title: પ્યારું


text:
Șomtelec

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Șomtelec


text: bwejjeb

title: bwejjeb


text: bibejn

title: bibejn


text:
Tothaza

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Tothaza


text: bibien

title: bibien


text: bwieb

title: bwieb


text: θεραπείᾳ

title: θεραπείᾳ


text: προσποιήσειαν

title: προσποιήσειαν


text: περιγίγνεται

title: περιγίγνεται


text:
Sotelec

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Sotelec


text:
Sâmbotelec

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Sâmbotelec


text: καλόκαιρος

title: καλόκαιρος


text:
Валленберг

Etymology
From.

title: Валленберг


text:
Sâmboleni

Etymology
From.

title: Sâmboleni


text: ჩხარტიშვილი

title: ჩხარტიშვილი


text:
Pedraforca

Etymology
From.

title: Pedraforca


text:
Ротштейн

Etymology
From.

title: Ротштейн


text:
Sâmbou

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Sâmbou


text:
Тищенко

Declension
The feminine form is indeclinable.

title: Тищенко


text:
Sâmboieni

Etymology
From.

title: Sâmboieni


text: Category:Catalan verbs with j-g alternation


text: streamant

title: streamant


text: streamé

title: streamé


text: streamée

title: streamée


text: streamés

title: streamés


text: streamées

title: streamées


text: καλοκαιρία

title: καλοκαιρία


text:
சைனம்

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1) Jainism

title: சைனம்


text: streamons

title: streamons


text: streamez

title: streamez


text: လွင်ႈၵႄႈ

title: လွင်ႈၵႄႈ


text: streament

title: streament


text:
Эрдоган

Etymology
From.

title: Эрдоган


text: streamais

title: streamais


text: Category:Russian renderings of Turkish surnames


text: версією

title: версією


text: streamait

title: streamait


text: streamions

title: streamions


text: streamiez

title: streamiez


text: streamaient

title: streamaient


text: streamai

title: streamai


text: версію

title: версію


text:
Ататюрк

Etymology
From.

Etymology
From.

title: Ататюрк


text: streamâmes

title: streamâmes


text: streamâtes

title: streamâtes


text: streamèrent

title: streamèrent


text: streamerai

title: streamerai


text: streameras

title: streameras


text: streamera

title: streamera


text: streamerons

title: streamerons


text: Category:Pali terms belonging to the root sam (calm)


text: streamerez

title: streamerez


text: streameront

title: streameront


text: Category:Pali terms belonging to the root sam (weary)


text: Category:Pali terms belonging to the root sam (toil)


text: streamerais

title: streamerais


text: streamerait

title: streamerait


text: streamerions

title: streamerions


text: streameriez

title: streameriez


text:
preinsertional

Adjective

 * 1) Before an insertion.

title: preinsertional


text:
postinsertional

Adjective

 * 1) After an insertion.

title: postinsertional


text:
Скочиленко

Declension
The feminine form is indeclinable.

title: Скочиленко


text: streameraient

title: streameraient


text: streamasse

title: streamasse


text: streamasses

title: streamasses


text:
Prepirineus

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) The.

title: Prepirineus


text: streamât

title: streamât


text: streamassions

title: streamassions


text: streamassiez

title: streamassiez


text: streamassent

title: streamassent


text:
καλοκαιριανός

Noun

 * 1) an eye-salve

title: καλοκαιριανός


text: Category:Ukrainian renderings of Turkish surnames


text:
Пауэрс

Etymology
From.

title: Пауэрс


text:
Șonfalău

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  . Renamed to  in 1925.

title: Șonfalău


text:
Макнамара

Etymology
From, from.

title: Макнамара


text:
גאולוג

Etymology
Originally from, from + , likely via various —e.g. , , —from which it was borrowed by Jewish bilingual speakers as , whence it made its way into the modern Hebrew lexicon.

Noun

 * 1) geologist (male, or ungendered)

title: גאולוג


text: turd world

title: turd world


text:
barama

Etymology
, compare 🇨🇬. The intervocalic Persian /-d-/ regularly corresponds to Tat /-r-/.

Noun

 * 1) cocoon

title: barama


text:
Janaína

Etymology
From.

title: Janaína


text:
стример

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  streamer
 * 2)  streamer

title: стример


text:
ehtiva etmək

Verb

 * 1) to embrace, to encompass, enfold; to cover

title: ehtiva etmək


text:
falâ

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to speak
 * 2) to say
 * 3)  to tell
 * 1) to say
 * 2)  to tell
 * 1)  to tell
 * 1)  to tell
 * 1)  to tell

Usage notes

 * Although also means "to speak", it has a more specific sense about speaking a language or an otherwise tongue, as well as the sense of "to talk".

title: falâ


text:
cazibə

Etymology
, feminine of, active participle of.

Noun

 * 1)  gravitation, gravity
 * 2) attraction, appeal

title: cazibə


text:
Blandiana

Etymology
. The ancient Roman name replaced the name.

title: Blandiana


text: стримера

title: стримера


text: стримеру

title: стримеру


text:
çidar

Etymology
Ultimately from, whence also Khalkha 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) hobble

title: çidar


text: стримером

title: стримером


text: стримере

title: стримере


text: стримеры

title: стримеры


text: стримеров

title: стримеров


text: стримерам

title: стримерам


text: стримерами

title: стримерами


text: стримерах

title: стримерах


text:
cizyə

Etymology
, from,.

Noun

 * 1)  jizya

title: cizyə


text:
çökük

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) concave
 * 2) sunken

title: çökük


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2023/December 20


text:
dəxmə

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1) tomb
 * 2)  dakhma, tower of silence
 * 1)  dakhma, tower of silence

title: dəxmə


text:
Moral Majoritarian

Noun

 * 1)  A member of the Moral Majority.

title: Moral Majoritarian


text: honey-sweetest

title: honey-sweetest


text:
Рузвельт

Etymology
From, from.

title: Рузвельт


text:
wheatpasting

Noun

 * 1) The act or activity of affixing posters in public places using wheat paste, typically as a form of activism.

title: wheatpasting


text:
əks-əlaqə

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) feedback

title: əks-əlaqə


text:
Corberes

Etymology
From, from.

Proper noun

 * 1) The
 * 2) A natural comarca consisting of the region covered by the.

title: Corberes


text:
Уильямс

Etymology
From.

title: Уильямс


text:
ઉઠમણું

Etymology
, from.

title: ઉઠમણું


text:
labitâ

Etymology
. Suggested by some to be of Portuguese origin. Possibly related to.

Verb

 * 1) to speak
 * 2) to parrot to repeat exactly without showing understanding
 * 1) to parrot to repeat exactly without showing understanding
 * 1) to parrot to repeat exactly without showing understanding

title: labitâ


text: streameur

title: streameur


text: streameurs

title: streameurs


text:
mǟ

Noun

 * 1) tail
 * 2) behind

title: mǟ


text:
Гувер

Etymology
From.

Etymology
From.

title: Гувер


text:
əlaqələndirmək

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to attribute to

title: əlaqələndirmək


text:
'ook'

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) be, exist, be born

title: 'ook'


text:
ələmək

Verb

 * 1) to sift, to strain

title: ələmək


text:
əndazə

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) pattern template for making clothes
 * 2) measure, extent

title: əndazə


text: Lacion

title: Lacion


text:
içinə pox qoymaq

Etymology
lit. 'to put shit into'.

Verb

 * 1) to ruin, to screw up, to mess up

title: içinə pox qoymaq


text:
Джонсон

Etymology
From.

Etymology
From.

title: Джонсон


text:
ipəkqurdu

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) silkworm

title: ipəkqurdu


text:
kodlaşdırma

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) coding
 * 2) encoding
 * 1) encoding

title: kodlaşdırma


text:
Картер

Etymology
From.

title: Картер


text: дужці

title: дужці


text:
Template:ws header/styles.css

.ts-thesaurus-header-wrapper { display: table; }

.ts-thesaurus-header { border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #f8f9fa; display: flex; align-items: center; flex-wrap: wrap; }

.ts-thesaurus-header > div { padding: 0.28571429em; /* 4 / 14 */ padding-left: 1em; }

.ts-thesaurus-header-logo { text-transform: uppercase; }

/* Can't use `::first-letter` here due to some Firefox bug that results in  setting an incorrect width to `.ts-thesaurus-header-logo`. Have tried `width: min-content` and such tricks - didn't work. */ .ts-thesaurus-header-logo-firstLetter { font-size: 120%; }

.ts-thesaurus-header-headword > span { font-size: 120%; font-weight: bold; }

.ts-thesaurus-header-search .mw-searchInput { min-height: 32px; }

.ts-thesaurus-header-toc { display: none; float: right; max-width: 33%; clear: both; margin-left: 0.5em; }

title: Template:ws header/styles.css


text: дужок

title: дужок


text: Flowery Field

title: Flowery Field


text:
Чаушеску

Etymology
From.

Declension
This noun is indeclinable

Etymology
From.

Declension
This noun is indeclinable

title: Чаушеску


text:
məlumatlandırmaq

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to inform

title: məlumatlandırmaq


text:
məlumatlanmaq

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to become informed, knowledgeable

title: məlumatlanmaq


text:
pinəçi

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cobbler

title: pinəçi


text: Category:Russian renderings of Romanian surnames


text:
pinəçilik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cobblery

title: pinəçilik


text:
proqramlaşdırma

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) programming

title: proqramlaşdırma


text: Category:Ukrainian renderings of Romanian surnames


text:
qolac

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fathom

title: qolac


text:
sənədləşdirmək

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to document

title: sənədləşdirmək


text:
taksavatlıq

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) driving private taxicab; the trade of a taxi driver

title: taksavatlıq


text:
ಈಡಿ

Etymology
Cognate to 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) toddy

title: ಈಡಿ


text:
zağlamaq

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to blue

title: zağlamaq


text:
Валенса

Etymology
From.

title: Валенса


text: vixilias

title: vixilias


text:
Talk:rear front

RFD discussion: January–December 2023
Probably SOP. There are a few military meanings of front, which may or may not be a valid argument for keeping (or for deletion, for that matter) Celui qui crée ébauches de football anglais (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Administrators ought to block Wonderfool User:Celui qui crée ébauches de football anglais already, protecting the project against this little playful devil. This RFD ought to be dismissed; Wonderfool ought not be allowed to create RFD nominations. Wonderfool's social standing ought to be demolished. Wonderfool ought to pledge to stop using multiple accounts, stop editing irresponsibly, and pledge to become a respectable adult citizen of the English Wiktionary. Wonderfool ought to stop being a playful child in the sense of little funny mischievous rascal and become a responsible adult; age-wise, it is probably about time. Wonderfool is one of the most useful and productive editors the English Wiktionary ever had and ought to do much better. --Dan Polansky (talk) 04:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

 * I replaced the original Webster link, which no longer worked. DonnanZ (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

 * Might be one for RFV since I can't find any examples of this in actual use outside of dictionaries. In earlier specialist military dictionaries it's used as an adjective or adverb, and refers to the whole formation, not a single rank, e.g. . There may be a game of telephone at work: the gloss copied from Webster's 1913 is "The rear rank of a body of troops when faced about and standing in that position", Worcester's 1847 has "a company or body of men when faced about, and standing in that position", citing Crabb; Crabb 1823 has "a term applied to a battalion, troop, or company, when it is faced about, and stands in that position". For the RFD as such, I would say keep since the meaning of the term, judging from the source I linked which essentially defines it as the troops individually facing backwards without the formation itself being rotated, is not really straightforward. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 07:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for scrapping my effort. DonnanZ (talk) 12:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Definition's word for word from Webster's and seems to be wrong so I'm afraid there's no reason to remove the notice, it's re-pointed to the right entry. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Re-pointed to a load of other stuff too. Anyway, it seems to be archaic, I don't know what was in vogue in 1913, the year of my father's birth. DonnanZ (talk) 14:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

 * I've RFVed it and commented about the apparent POS there. - -sche (discuss) 00:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Deleted via RFV, for lacking citations of idiomatic use in anything like this sense in any part of speech. - -sche (discuss) 00:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

RFV discussion: September–December 2023
Per discussion at RFD, finding out whether this is actually citable in any sense as specific as the one provided in the entry — and if so, in what sense, and in what part of speech — would help determine whether it's idiomatic or keepable. For reference, here is the definition in an old dictionary, where it seems more adjectival than nounal: The only earlier cites I spot seem quite SOP, simply describing a number of fronts (the left front on the left, the right front, the rear front, etc): - -sche (discuss) 00:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1743, Humphrey Bland, A Treatise of Military Discipline, page 110:
 * When the Division of Drummers in the Rear of the Rear Face beats a March, they are all to face and march towards that Front, thus: The Platoons of Granadiers wheel, as before, towards that Front. The Front Face goes to the Right-about on their Left Heels. [...] After which, they are all to march towards the Rear Front, as long as the March continues beating, [...]
 * Only instance I could find in the wild: "no disciplined army understands the right about, rear-front march, better" (1828). —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Everything aside from Webster 1913 seems to point to it being a front-back analog of upside down, which is an adverb or adjective. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, failed. - -sche (discuss) 00:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:rear front


text:
Talk:a lick of

RFD discussion: August–December 2023
This is basically just lick sense 7. Im guessing we have a separate entry for this because it is almost never pluralized .... no one says "i only did two licks of work" .... but it seems like an unlikely search term, and it's only incoming link is from lick, so almost everyone reading the page has already seen the term defined on the lick page. Note this is similar to a good deal which I would also have expected to find at good deal and which is also rarely if ever pluralized. Even so, I think there must be a better solution for terms like this than having a separate entry that just adds an a or an a and an of. — Soap — 20:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * As with world of difference recently, the plural is better attested than you might think—"two licks of" certainly is ("you ain't got two licks of sense", "I hadn't done two licks of work" , "the only one with two licks of sense" etc.), and so is stuff like "two or three licks of Latin" here. I agree this should be deleted, though perhaps the most user-friendly solution is to use senseid and redirect to the specific sense at lick. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 00:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect if you want. Ultimateria (talk) 01:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete. Equinox ◑ 11:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: redundant to lick. — Sgconlaw (talk) 12:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD failed. Kept as a redirect Denazz (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:a lick of


text:
Talk:reduce to rubble

RFD discussion: July–December 2023
SOP. PUC – 09:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

 * It does have figurative use ("dreams reduced to rubble"), where "rubble" alone generally doesn't (?). Equinox ◑ 13:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * ”Rubble” does not need to be understood strictly materially. It is even covered by our definition of it “the broken remains of an object” when broken is taken figuratively. Figurative senses otherwise are often left out. SOP. Fay Freak (talk) 13:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * "turn to rubble" can also be used figuratively ("The social, political, and economic system of the whole country had turned to rubble"), as well as "pile of rubble" ("my life is a pile of rubble"). PUC – 14:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

 * Yes, PUC, I didn't write an explicit "keep": this was just an observation. Equinox ◑ 01:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete Any meaning assigned above doesn't appear to be specific to this phrase * Pppery * it has begun... 21:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 01:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD deleted Denazz (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:reduce to rubble


text:
Talk:global conspiracy

RFD discussion: October–December 2023
It is a conspiracy and it is global. I don't see how this goes beyond SoP. Equinox ◑ 06:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I favor deletion as it is currently defined, but if this is just a shortcut for globalist conspiracy I'd say it's no longer sum-of-parts. globalism is a specific ideology and not simply a cover term for all multinational political movements.  — Soap — 13:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as SoP. — Sgconlaw (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. PUC – 12:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP, though unfortunately we would include German Weltverschwörung, but perhaps the degree of idiomaticity is different. Fay Freak (talk) 16:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete as SOP. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 00:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD failed Denazz (talk) 19:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:global conspiracy


text:
Talk:ballet school

RFD discussion: October–December 2023
"A school for ballet." Well, thanks for enlightening us ...P. Sovjunk (talk) 10:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC) RFD-deleted This, that and the other (talk) 09:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WT:THUB, two qualifying translations that are not word-for-word compounds are required. Currently there are zero. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as SoP. — Sgconlaw (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as SOP. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 00:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:ballet school


text:
Talk:intuiter

RFD discussion: November 2023
Word not found in dictionaries.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intuiter

Rubsley (talk) 18:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Not a valid reason to delete and the word looks trivial to attest. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * we have many terms that are not found in other dictionaries. They may be included so long as they satisfy our criteria for inclusion—in particular, that they are used in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year. If you feel that a particular term does not meet these criteria, it may be nominated for verification at "Requests for verification". — Sgconlaw (talk) 19:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for explaining. Rubsley (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Obviously keep. I've added 3 citations., this is a dictionary, so clearly the word is found in a dictionary: this one. Obviously you can't make a good dictionary by just copying what older people did before you, and not include new real words too. Next time, google it. Equinox ◑ 19:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Where are the citations? "Intuiter" citations page is empty. Rubsley (talk) 21:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Rubsley You should see a small "quotations" button to the right of the definition, which will display them. We tend to prefer making the quotations readily accessible like this when they aren't too verbose. Theknightwho (talk) 09:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy kept as it’s cited, and the initial request made no sense. The content of other dictionaries cannot be used to justify deleting a term. Theknightwho (talk) 04:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:intuiter


text:
Talk:BLEE BLAH BLEE BLEH

RFD discussion: November–December 2023
tagged this entry with the "d" template. I believe the entry should be kept, as the phrase is verifiably used in multiple instances. CJ-Moki (talk) 09:12, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Just a note that citations are supposed to meet WT:CFI, i.e. not random net forums that may be deleted at any time. So send to RFV to find compliant cites. Equinox ◑ 09:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It has 1 single result on google Sundaydriver1 (talk) 09:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't convey any meaning; it's merely used as part of standard "it's so random" type of humor. — S URJECTION / T / C / L / 13:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete this nonsense. It belongs in an "Encyclopaedia of Songs", perhaps. DonnanZ (talk) 14:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Surjection and DonnanZ. lattermint (talk) 14:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

 * Speedy closed Denazz (talk) 21:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

 * Deleted as not dictionary material. - -sche (discuss) 21:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:BLEE BLAH BLEE BLEH


text:
Talk:KA-BLAOW

RFD discussion: September–December 2023
A louder form of the sound. This is not a separate word, just a typical use of capitalization. We wouldn't create "BOOM" as a louder boom, etc. Equinox ◑ 18:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete' Ioaxxere (talk) 04:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom, lol. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 21:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

ka-BLAOW
A louder form of the sound. This is not a separate word, just a typical use of capitalization. We wouldn't create "BOOM" as a louder boom, etc. Equinox ◑ 18:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete both per nominator. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  21:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * de-LETE as above. — Soap — 12:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * delete, lol Jberkel 08:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete' Ioaxxere (talk) 04:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 21:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

 * RFD failed Denazz (talk) 21:49, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:KA-BLAOW


text:
Talk:religious priest

RFD discussion: September–December 2023
SOP? P. Sovjunk (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

 * How bizarre. Is a "non-religious priest" even possible? Equinox ◑ 22:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Yup! This terminology predates the modern usage. "Religious" here refers to the literal sense of being bound to a rule (influenced by the Christian folk etymology ) or being set aside for religious life (i.e. following the three evangelical counsels and belonging to a religious order). A non-religious priest is called a secular or diocesan priest, which is what most parish priests are. It's quite common in certain Catholic circles to hear references to "religious priests" and "diocesan priests" in counterdistinction to each other. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 00:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, but we're missing the appropriate adjectival sense at (i.e. "pertaining or belonging to religious or consecrated life"). Andrew Sheedy (talk) 00:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If such a sense is added, it should be “pertaining or belonging to a religious order”; secular priests are also supposed to lead a religious life. But is this specific sense used in other collocations than religious priest (and, obviously but circularly, religious order)? --Lambiam 11:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The most accurate definition would probably be "pertaining or belonging to a religious order or congregation". Collocations with this sense of "religious" include: religious life, religious congregation, religious sister, religious habit (i.e. the garment worn by religious), religious house (a convent or monastery), religious vows, religious rule (the rule of life of a religious order), etc. That's just what I can think of off the top of my head. Because of the possible ambiguity involved, I don't think this sense is used postpositively much, or if it is, it is used in context where it could also be interpreted as substantive (especially in informal usage, "a religious" is a member of a religious order or congregation, with the plural being simply "religious", so "They are religious" is, IMO, more likely to be a noun than an adjective when used in this sense). Andrew Sheedy (talk) 19:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete' Ioaxxere (talk) 04:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing to add to what Andrew said and it seems to be covered adequately at religious now. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

RFD failed Denazz (talk) 21:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:religious priest


text:
Talk:United Nations Economic and Social Council

RFD discussion: September 2022–September 2023

 * Keep all per WT:THUB. Some readers would like to know NATO (or Nato in UK) is OTAN in French, NAVO in Dutch, etc. Otherwise I would defer to Wikipedia. Facts707 (talk) 10:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration
It apparently appears in two or three dictionaries- see Further reading there. I am unclear if WT:LEMMING would apply to this case as an argument for inclusion. (My instinct is to go with the authoritative dictionaries to maintain the legitimacy of Wiktionary in the eyes of the readers.) --Geographyinitiative (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC) (modified)
 * Keep per lemmings in the entry, although I nominated this and although they are not the traditional ones except Collins. I won't shed a tear if this is deleted since the name is kind of transparent and I would not vote keep without lemmings, but I still like the general lemming principle. We have no sound and comprehensive criteria for multi-word proper names, and lemmings help us include United Arab Emirates and World War II, for instance. We should sooner delete United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, I think; it is no less "encyclopedic" and is not supported by lemmings. Admittedly, lemmings would have us include Federal Aviation Administration, Food and Drug Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and Central Intelligence Agency, so if you don't like that consequence, that's probably a delete from you. Later: I spoke too soon: the full name of the U.K. is supported by lemmings. Oh, well. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * We should not be including terms in non-LDLs just because other dictionaries have them. Theknightwho (talk) 16:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That's a normative opinion, not a fact. I have more at . The lemming principle is in the spirit of Wikipedia, which depends on reliable sources, whereas Wiktionary is full of opinionated people who love to think for themselves, which is quite attractive but is not without problems. The rationale "encyclopedic" is a blanket statement of ignorance, not a statement of principle. "Quasi sum of parts" is a statement of principle, and I see it here, but I defer to lemmings. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You say yourself that there is nothing lexically interesting about these and that they are "quasi sum of parts", but want to include them solely on the basis that they're included in one other dictionary (Collins). If your principle is just to blindly follow what other publications have done, then my "normative opinion" is that we shouldn't do that. The major difference between Wiktionary and Wikipedia is that Wiktionary is a secondary source, not a tertiary one; that means we generally have to curate at the point of inclusion, whereas Wikipedia has far more scope to vary the manner in which something is included, proportionally to its notability. It also leaves us in the absurd position of including some terms in a class but not others, due to the (potentially arbitrary) decisions of other publications. No thanks. Theknightwho (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That is not really absurd and appears unavoidable anyway. All dictionaries do it and the otherwise excellent OED is quite bad at it, with its apparently arbitrary inclusion of some proper names but not others, as per Beer parlour. One can ask: why should United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland be included while National Aeronautics and Space Administration excluded? I see no principle based on purely lexicographic concerns that differentiates the two. Do you see such a principle? And do you have sound comprehensive inclusion criteria for multi-word proper names? --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You not being able to see the principle does not mean that outsourcing it to other publications is a good idea. I look forward to seeing your nomination to undelete Talk:西線無戰事 and all the other novel titles that are included in the Taiwan Ministry of Education dictionary. Theknightwho (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * No one has given us these principles, not me, not you, not anyone else, except perhaps those who say, delete all proper names or delete all multi-word proper names. Is "Taiwan Ministry of Education dictionary" a general monolingual linguistic dictionary? And a single dictionary does not count for lemmings either. Outsourcing inclusion (not exclusion) would give contributors certainty that some of the content they will create would be predictably kept. What we have now is not really consistent either, randomly depending on who shows up in the RFD. Some want United Nations excluded since all organizations are "encyclopedic", some included. The lemmings would give us includable core around which we could ponder expansion into a more uncertain territory. I have drafted some inclusion principles on my talk page, but they are not wholly comprehensive and would probably exclude United Nations, which I don't see happening. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is a general monolingual linguistic dictionary which we use very extensively, and you can see the entry here. The fact that you changed your opinion based on the inclusion by Collins alone also makes your point that a single dictionary doesn't count for lemmings irrelevant, anyway, and I shouldn't have to explain why the inevitable variability of who turns up to RFD doesn't justify doing things blindly instead.
 * Let's be honest, here: you dislike the uncertainty, and would rather have an arbitrary line than a fuzzy one. If you don't trust our collective judgment in excluding these kinds of terms, then you also have no basis trusting our collective judgment in including others, either. Theknightwho (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The full NASA name is in Collins and Dictionary.com so that's two; it is also in WordNet, but that does not count. If one argued that Dictionary.com should not count, I could perhaps be convinced and change my mind. The count of two does matter and was required in the failed vote. Predictably administrable policies are a widely recognized good, while you seem to be inexplicably dismissive about this good. Presumably, contributors prefer to be able to predict that the content they create will be kept. The notion that we should trust collective judgment of varying groups of decision makers, who do not agree on inclusion principles among themselves and each votes according to different inclusion principles and keep changing their minds as time passes, seems bizarre. Even with lemmings, the line would be fuzzy since we would include things beyond lemmings, but there would be a secure core. I created the vote that replaced the attributive-use rule with today's open-ended uncertainty, so it is really not about me personally. The derogatory use of "blindly" has no force: our CFI for geographic names has the RFD participants do things "blindly" for them, and that was presumably the purpose of the place name policy, which seems rather arbitrary from lexicographical standpoint but does exactly that which you dismiss: let us do things in a predictable manner. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yet you do trust the "collective judgment of varying groups of decision makers, who do not agree on inclusion principles among themselves and each votes according to different inclusion principles and keep changing their minds as time passes" when it comes to the inclusion of terms not in other dictionaries, as I have already pointed out. You're just trying to sweep the fuzziness under the rug, but that doesn't make it go away - particularly as those very same points apply to the people that made those other dictionaries in the first place.
 * Including things on a per-class basis is not the same as your proposal, because those are decided on the basis of what the terms refer to, while your proposal is decided on the basis of what other people have decided. That's why it's a useful signpost, but not a distinguishing characteristic. Theknightwho (talk) 19:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, lemmings do not eliminate all uncertainty, just some. Better than nothing. Fuzziness remains as admitted: no sweeping under the rag given the admission. Deciding on the basis of what the terms refer to is non-lexicographic. It is not obviously better than deferring to others: both is predictable and both is lexicographically arbitrary. There does not seem to be anything lexicographical about Small Magellanic Cloud, but CFI has it included. CFI has "X County" terms included, lemmings don't. You may like the arbitrary referent-based policy better, that's up to you, that's not a matter of objective facts. You have not posted any inclusion principles and you have not even voted yet; you just ask us to trust inconsistent collective judgment. That's pretty empty handed, if you ask me. If that's the readers' and users' policy preference, I can't help it. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't object on the basis that LEMMINGS doesn't eliminate all uncertainty - I objected on the basis that the removal of uncertainty is not justified by implementing arbitrary rules. The fact that you say "better than nothing" actually confirms my point that you're only doing this because you want to make the decisionmaking process simpler, ignoring that it removes editorial control from users and does nothing to solve the underlying problem. That is not a good approach. It was also soundly rejected by vote (and having checked, many users had the same sentiments as me), so please stop trying to force it.
 * "Deciding on the basis of what the terms refer to" is an inherent aspect of the sum of parts principle, and the basis of several guidelines at WT:IDIOM. Fundamentally, those are all "arbitrary" too, in that we've decided that they best suit the purpose of what a dictionary is for (which is a normative judgment, as you say). However, there is a clear, qualitative difference between deciding based on the meaning of a term and deciding for each individual term on the basis of whether other dictionaries have included them or not: the former is based on a property of the term itself (and the classes it fits into), while your proposal is not, and leads to random inclusion/exclusion in cases such as 西線無戰事 (which is the title of a novel) - and before you object by saying that 西線無戰事 is only in one dictionary, I am obviously not just talking about that one entry.
 * It's also all very well to point out that there are other arbitrary things as well, such as who participates in RFD discussions, but that's not persuasive because (a) the decisions are not random, (b) they're governed by Wiktionary policy (unlike other dictionaries), and (c) that objection also applies to any decision we make in respect of LEMMINGS, so it's self-defeating. Theknightwho (talk) 23:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I disagree with most of the above. The SOP principle does not depend on classification of referents at all. Again, two lemmings are the minimum. I feel this is getting repetitive and unproductive. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Ignoring the primary point while misrepresenting what I said about the SOP principle is not an adequate response. You very clearly have no response to the major flaw in your proposal that it allows for random inclusion/exclusion based on the whims of other publications, and just don’t want to admit it. Theknightwho (talk) 10:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The so-called major flaw is a real downside. But the upside is much bigger. What we have now is whim of randomly varying amateurs; whim of the pros seems much preferable. Just recently, Bank of England was deleted while non-SOP and European Central Bank was kept while SOP. Lemmings would have prevented that. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no upside - it’s just sweeping the arbitrariness under the carpet by making it look like it isn’t, which is a point you’ve failed to address with anything other than saying what we do is already arbitrary, while ignoring the difference between inclusion on a per-class basis versus a per-term basis and the difference in outcomes that creates. Nevermind the disdain you have just shown for your fellow users, which is a whole other issue. Theknightwho (talk) 10:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The upside of improved predictability and consistency is as undeniable as the downside of partial loss of autonomy and gain of certain arbitrariness (attestation is still a requirement). Wikipedia is doing fine deferring to pros for inclusion and even for fact. I have no disdain: I am as much an amateur as others here. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * It has “certainty” in the way that including every attestable string of more than 5 characters has certainty, but that doesn’t mean we should implement it. We are also a secondary source, not a tertiary one like WP (and you must not be familiar with how hotly contested AFD can be - notability is not straightforward). I haven’t even begun with the other flaws, such as the fact that other dictionaries copy from each other (making inclusion in two often non-independent), errors, the question of historical dictionaries (and other hybrid works), propagandistic material (plenty of those in Russian from the Soviet era), the inherent biases of the authors and so on. It’s not workable, and is - to boil it down - lazy scholarship. Theknightwho (talk) 11:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * (outdent) The lemming principle's arbitrariness is nowhere close to as bad and off topic as "include all 5 character combinations"; that's pretty much a non-argument. The principle is obviously workable; it is not ideal, but workable. I guess Wikipedia editors are also "lazy scholars" by depending on potentially erroneous authoritative sources instead of diligently doing their original research, which is much more work than taking over sentences from sources and rephrasing them. Whether we are a secondary or tertiary source makes no difference; our being a secondary source for WDLs (not always for LDLs) does not bar the lemming principle. And we would not even depend on them for matters of fact, merely for matters of inclusion. At worst, we would scope in too many redundant entries, no error of fact. Including a million entries for all the taxa from Wikispecies is the real elephant in the room, the king of avoidable redundancy; no one ever talks about that. About dictionaries copying from each other, the way in which they wary in their coverage of proper names depending on the name one picks suggests they are not trying particularly hard to outdo each other in covering anything anyone else has; the non-independence claim does not seem to be borne out by observable facts. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you agree that there are degrees of arbitrariness, then your argument that our current practice is also arbitrary falls apart, because it is self-evidently more arbitrary to include terms on a per-term basis than a per-class one. You also seem to have missed that I said that WP’s notability requirement is not comparable, because notability is hotly contested, and they don’t just include anything simply because it’s sourced. The latter would also be lazy scholarship. I also don’t care what Wikispecies is doing - another project making an error (and I make no comment on Wikispecies either way) is no justification for us making one too. Oh, and being a secondary source does bar the lemming principle, because other dictionaries are secondary sources. You realise that’s one of the things that distinguishes dictionaries and encyclopaedias, right? Theknightwho (talk) 12:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * (outdent) My complaint is above all that our practice is inconsistent and unpredictable since it depends on who comes to RFD and since RFD voters often state no usable criteria, instead throwing around the buzzword "encyclopedic". Our place name criteria are arbitrary, but that can be lived with; at least they are predictable. If adopted as a policy, the application of the lemming principle would be pretty straightforward and not hotly contested; in this we would differ from Wikipedia's AfD. We would at worst discuss whether a particular lemming counts, and we could keep refining our lists of accepted lemmings. Wikispecies is not making any error: it is their core business to document taxa. It is us who is making the error of avoidable redundancy to Wikispecies, which is not our lexicographical business. Right. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Predictability has no value if the outcome is arbitrary, and including things on a per-term basis instead of a per-class basis is a lot more arbitrary. We often self-correct mistakes, and we do not need a straitjacket like this which short-circuits productive discussion by simply deferring to people with inclusion criteria that we don’t even know. Theknightwho (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * To the contrary, rule design usually buys predictability at the cost of increased arbitrariness. To wit, the number 3 of attesting quotations is arbitrary: it could be 2, it could be 5, and it could be left unspecified and discussed on a per RFV basis. Setting it to 3 increases predictability. Any lemming principle acceptable as an approved policy would have to be overidable anyway, so there would be no "straightjacket". What about Wikispecies? Any point taken so far? --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I have pointed out that arbitrariness is not all-or-nothing numerous times now, and you have stonewalled that every time (except when you felt it convenient when I used a ridiculous example to prove the point). It’s very clear that you are not engaging in reasonable discussion, whether you realise it or not, so I’m done here. Theknightwho (talk) 13:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * (outdent) My complaint is above all that our practice is inconsistent and unpredictable since it depends on who comes to RFD and since RFD voters often state no usable criteria, instead throwing around the buzzword "encyclopedic". Our place name criteria are arbitrary, but that can be lived with; at least they are predictable. If adopted as a policy, the application of the lemming principle would be pretty straightforward and not hotly contested; in this we would differ from Wikipedia's AfD. We would at worst discuss whether a particular lemming counts, and we could keep refining our lists of accepted lemmings. Wikispecies is not making any error: it is their core business to document taxa. It is us who is making the error of avoidable redundancy to Wikispecies, which is not our lexicographical business. Right. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Predictability has no value if the outcome is arbitrary, and including things on a per-term basis instead of a per-class basis is a lot more arbitrary. We often self-correct mistakes, and we do not need a straitjacket like this which short-circuits productive discussion by simply deferring to people with inclusion criteria that we don’t even know. Theknightwho (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * To the contrary, rule design usually buys predictability at the cost of increased arbitrariness. To wit, the number 3 of attesting quotations is arbitrary: it could be 2, it could be 5, and it could be left unspecified and discussed on a per RFV basis. Setting it to 3 increases predictability. Any lemming principle acceptable as an approved policy would have to be overidable anyway, so there would be no "straightjacket". What about Wikispecies? Any point taken so far? --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I have pointed out that arbitrariness is not all-or-nothing numerous times now, and you have stonewalled that every time (except when you felt it convenient when I used a ridiculous example to prove the point). It’s very clear that you are not engaging in reasonable discussion, whether you realise it or not, so I’m done here. Theknightwho (talk) 13:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

 * @Dan Polansky (CC: @Theknightwho though I assume you already know this) The UK & UAE examples are automatically included with WT:CFI. If you’re going to argue that Place names shouldn’t be a policy, that’s a different discussion, but under our current policy, there’s a different between those and the full name of NASA. No comment at this point on the others though. AG202 (talk) 01:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, but what I am investigating here are universal lexicographical principles, not those taxonomy-based arbitrary rules currently in CFI. "Exclude all multi-word proper names that name in a transparent manner", or exclude quasi-SOP names, sounds like a fine universal principle, but we do not intend to comprehensively enforce it. About the value of lemmings, let's consider the recently RFD-deleted Bank of England and the recently RFD-kept European Central Bank. The former is not quasi sum of parts (the bank serves the U.K., not England), while the latter is quasi sum of parts (it is the central bank of the EU and the meaning of European includes "of or pertaining to the EU"). The result is the opposite of what should be done, and lemmings would have prevented that. ECB was kept by near unanimity and BoE was deleted under the 2/3 threshold, so maybe it should have been kept. This happened because different groups of editors voted in the RFDs, and for BoE the deletionist ignored all the non-SOP objections and deleted the term anyway. Both terms are supported by lemmings: if both were kept, the situation would be better. One could object that we do not apply the "exclude quasi-SOP names" principle consistently, and the response would be, we mostly do except where overriden by lemmings. Dismissing lemmings would not improve the consistency all that much since we ignore the delete-SOP principle for place names; for states, this would be fine, but we include all those "X County" terms for no apparent reason. NASA is a more important organization than counties so if we include quasi-SOP county names, we can also include quasi-SOP full NASA name, together with quasi-SOP full ECB name. This leads us to classifying referents and not terms, and without lemmings, we now have to figure out which referents are large, important or powerful enough. One can also work with the lemmings principle flexibly, if one wishes: one may say that Dictionary.com does not count and that the sole Collins is not enough, and therefore NASA full name should be excluded; that's actually pretty convincing. If we had an overridable lemmings policy (overridable since otherwise it won't gain support), we could explicitly forbid Dictionary.com and make the lemming application more predictable and uniform. Without lemmings, what should be done for NASA? It is quasi SOP, but is it perhaps as prominent, notable or significant as ECB to warrant an exception? We can now ponder the principles to apply to NASA and "exclude all-SOP names" does not seem to be accepted without exception, as per ECB. One of the deleters of BoE said "the name of an institution, which in itself is not dictionary material"; to me, it is the nearly all lemmings that include United Nations, including OED, which suggest the "not dictionary material" to be blatantly incorrect. There are too many editors on the project who seem to love to arbitrate that names for some class of referents are not dictionary material even when almost all lemmings disagree. So all names of organizations are supposed to be gone, while nicknames of some individuals should be kept: that is absurd even from the point of view of prominence or importance of the referent. In any case, for those who see some value in the overridable lemming principle, NASA is weakly supported by it, and WT:NSE gives discretion to RFD voters. One may decide to require 3 independent lemmings, that's flexible; United Nations is supported by 6 lemmings. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
These are the kind of long multi-word proper names that we probably do not want to include. There does not seem to be anything lexicographically interesting about them, and are covered by Wikipedia. Orthodox Church is perhaps more defensible. Past deleted proper names are in Category:RFD result for proper names (failed). The batch could be longer; this is a start to see how it goes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as SoP and encyclopedic. — Sgconlaw (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all as above. The only possible exception being the last one, as fundamentalist doesn’t really mean polygamous (though it is, or was, a fundament of the Mormon church). Overlordnat1 (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all except National Aeronautics and Space Administration, per lemmings; see the discussion under the term above. More exceptions can be granted if a rationale is provided, but I currently don't see it. Deleting NASA won't be a terrible loss, as the lemming case is pretty weak, unlike for United Nations. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep all except the army: I changed my mind. Our churches are listed at Thesaurus:church and we are not flooded by them. I thought it would be preferable to delete quasi-SOP names of organizations, but I am no longer convinced; it seems preferable to have some importance/notability criteria for them and keep some of the most important ones. Right now, we have no such criteria. In general, translation of proper names is a hard problem and Wiktionary can render a lexicographical service there. Wikidata has translations but not tracing to sources for them. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I started to keep track of inclusion arguments. Those that apply here: User:Dan Polansky/IA, User:Dan Polansky/IA, User:Dan Polansky/IA, User:Dan Polansky/IA. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Another step toward complete circularity: adding links in discussions to you talking to yourself in userspace. Whatever your intention, it makes it look like you have your own CFI that you consider more important than the real one, because everyone else is too stupid to think like you do. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No circularity here. CFI's official WT:NSE requires editors to figure out their own inclusion criteria and arguments. Yes, I have my own CFI, and everyone who participates in WT:NSE-driven RFDs has their own CFI. There is no other way. The links serve concision. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep the Latter-Day Saints one (not SoP), the UN ones (feel relevant enough that someone would look it up, though I wouldn't be devastated if they're gone), & NASA (LEMMING). The other church ones I'm ambivalent about, and then delete Army of the Republic of Vietnam. AG202 (talk) 12:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I feel the LDS one should be deleted as well since it is very long and covered by Wikipedia anyway. The implied rule behind the keeping seems to be "include all attested multi-word names of organizations that are not transparent names", but that would still lead to a huge redundancy to Wikipedia since there are so many of them. Going by length of the name seems terribly arbitrary, but it's better than nothing. Another arbitrary aid are lemmings: org name in WP & not in lemmings => out. No purely lexicographical principles to aid the filtering come to mind. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * So now you do want to exclude things based on how many characters are in the string? This one has more value than some of the others, as it isn’t immediately obvious what it refers to, or why they differ from other Mormons. “Fundamentalist” is playing a role here. Theknightwho (talk) 13:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Number of words, to be precise. Yes, it's terribly arbitrary. If we are going to include all intransparent proper names of organizations, we are heading into a major redundancy. But I am actually happy to use lemmings instead of the number of words. There has to be some additional exclusion principle, I feel. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I’ve had an idea: how about we consider terms on merit by discussing them, and then formulate a general policy once we can actually come up with one that isn’t arbitrary? How does that sound? Theknightwho (talk) 14:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Utopian. But if you can pull it off, so much better. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The great thing about it is that it means we don’t implement arbitrary policies like LEMMING in the meantime. Glad you’ve come around to that. Theknightwho (talk) 14:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * As far as I am concerned, WT:NSE and lemmings walk hand in hand until you pull it off. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Delete, as with Talk:Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Talk:Soviet Armed Forces, Canadian Armed Forces, etc, the last two of which Army of the Republic of Vietnam seems directly comparable to. - -sche (discuss) 01:35, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

I think it’s time for a general discussion about organization names at the Beer Parlour again, rather than trying to deal with this one entry at a time. — Sgconlaw (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I created Names of organizations to track the subject. Precedents are listed, as well as some arguments and counterarguments. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm confused to be honest as to why the LDS church name would not be SOP whereas the would be. The latter is a specific denomination and does not mean either a local church province (as the Orthodox ones can be read as) or the "church of Assyrians that's in the east". Any criterion that matches one goes for the other too. I also think attestable religious denominations ought to be included in general since it's not clear to me where the line ought to be drawn between minor ones that are encyclopedic and larger ones ("Roman Catholic Church" etc) that apparently aren't. So Keep both of those at least, I'm ambivalent on the rest. (Perhaps leaning keep on the Orthodox ones too, since they also represent distinctive practices and the precedent would otherwise logically lead to e.g. keeping Assyrian churches but deleting the sister Chaldean church since it happens to be in communion with the pope, which seems troubling.) —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 14:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

 * Keep all per WT:THUB. Some readers would like to know NATO (or Nato in UK) is OTAN in French, NAVO in Dutch, etc. Otherwise I would defer to Wikipedia. Facts707 (talk) 10:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

 * Kept all for no consensus. It was probably a poor idea to list all these together in the first place. This does not mean the terms could be RFD'd in future. Peace out xxx Jewle V (talk) 12:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


text:
Talk:role reversal

RFD discussion: November–December 2023
Sounds pretty SOP to me. PUC – 13:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree. delete Kiwima (talk) 19:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I disagree, keep. I am rather puzzled why PUC added a translation and then decided to RFD it. DonnanZ (talk) 19:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Why do you disagree? PUC – 19:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I think I considered SoP when creating the entry. I don't think the definitions at cover this, which is more like a swapping of roles. DonnanZ (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Probably keep: it's strongly idiomatic (we don't talk about "part reversal", even though a role is a part and you can "take someone's part"), and the definition indicates that it usually means two people trading places, not a single person reversing their role (e.g. hero becoming villain). Equinox ◑ 20:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not buy this idiomaticity argument. One can also say, in a reversal of the roles or, the roles were reversed, so if there is some idiomaticity, it is not in the specific collocation role reversal. In most of these other combinations you cannot substitute part for role either, but how is this an argument for idiomaticity? It applies equally in many contexts in which the term role is used, contexts that do not involve some role swapping, e.g., the role of the acid in our stomach, the role of this gadget  or the role of this question. --Lambiam 16:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

 * "How is this an argument for idiomaticity"? I thought that was what idiomaticity meant: the tendency to use one form when others would also make sense. Oh well, I don't care too much about what happens to this particular entry. Equinox ◑ 17:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The term has several distinguishable meanings, as does the term  to which it relates. You are referring to our sense 1: “A manner of speaking, a mode of expression peculiar to a language, language family, or group of people.” However, as used in our NISOP non-inclusion criterion, it refers to sense 3: “An established phrasal expression whose meaning may not be deducible from the literal meanings of its component words.”  --Lambiam 15:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Equinox's first line up above. A naive reader wouldn't know what this means without already knowing what it means. — Soap — 07:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Lean keep per Equinox. I'm not convinced by Lambiam's reasoning above, e.g. "French kiss" is obviously idiomatic even though it can be rearranged in various contexts (e.g. "kissed him French style"). —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 10:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

 * I'm leaning delete per Lambiam; a role reversal is a reversal ... of roles. OTOH, a number of other dictionaries (Cambridge, Collins, and seemingly the OED) have this, so meh. - -sche (discuss) 17:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

 * But it's not a reversal of one single role, even though it could be. Not hero to villain, predator to prey (unless the other entity also changes their role correspondingly). Equinox ◑ 19:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I added &lit in an attempt to cover that eventuality (hero to villain etc.) It can be reverted if inappropriate. DonnanZ (talk) 22:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Keep per fried egg test. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Kept per all the criteria tests that we have Denazz (talk) 21:46, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:role reversal


text:
Talk:acter

RFD discussion: November–December 2023
This was deleted per the one-acter RfD. There Wonderfool “suspect[ed] that the term one-acter was coined before acter”, and TheDaveRoss and Binarystep voted to delete and Equinox to keep, respectively, acter. For similar -er terms used in combination, see Category:English terms suffixed with -er (measurement) (e.g.,, , , , ). Alternatively, we would have, , , , , , , (all sufficiently attested). J3133 (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support undeletion. I created a few similar entries like without knowledge of that RFD, and yes I agree it makes sense to have single entries qualified as "in combination" over loads of (number)-...er terms which are easily comprehensible sums of parts. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 13:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Support undeletion. Equinox ◑ 15:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support. Theknightwho (talk) 15:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support It was never officially deleted, merely removed. diff. DonnanZ (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support. Weird that it was deleted in the first place. CitationsFreak (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

RFD-restored and changed the etymology to refer to sense 4 of as envisaged above. This, that and the other (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:acter


text:
Talk:second opinion

RFD discussion: December 2023
I know it's a common collocation and there's even a, but it still sounds completely SOP. Compare, opinion of a second X. PUC – 11:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't see any reason to delete this. Firstly, amongst the meanings for, it is an ordinal number; as for , Oxford describes this as a "statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter: if in doubt, get a second opinion". Besides the fact that a second opinion may agree with the first one, we don't seem to cover that definition. So, keep. DonnanZ (talk) 16:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * "amongst the meanings for second, it is an ordinal number": yes, but what's your point? PUC – 17:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * My main point, which you obviously missed, is concerning the definition of . DonnanZ (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I think what he's saying is that a "second opinion" may in fact be identical to a first opinion, which would seem (according to the definition of opinion) to make it a single opinion. Yet we would still call it a "second opinion" if it came from a second person. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Well. that's an interesting (and apt) analysis, but what I was really driving at is the Oxford def: "statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter". Do our definitions cover that? I don't think so. DonnanZ (talk) 00:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WT:FRIED & possibly WT:PRIOR. It's also in MW & Collins, and seems to be listed in the OED (I unfortunately do not have full access). AG202 (talk) 22:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The term second opinion means “the opinion of another expert ”, which cannot be readily inferred from the parts of the term. In the context of healthcare, the diagnosis or treatment plan of the first professional consulted appears not to be referred to as their “opinion”, even when a “second opinion” is being sought. --Lambiam 18:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lambiam. 2804:1B0:1901:5FD7:6060:15B5:AFC5:BD81 13:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per AG202 and Lambiam. lattermint (talk) 20:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

 * Keep: I found this online: "In my case, I got two second opinions, one from a surgeon and one from an oncologist." This person would not have said "I got a second opinion from a surgeon and a third from an oncologist." Equinox ◑ 20:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Kept by a landslide. PUC – 17:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:second opinion


text:
Talk:Alexandrian Orthodox Church

RFD discussion: September 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:United Nations Economic and Social Council.

title: Talk:Alexandrian Orthodox Church


text:
Talk:Bulgarian Orthodox Church

RFD discussion: September 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:United Nations Economic and Social Council.

title: Talk:Bulgarian Orthodox Church


text:
Talk:Albanian Orthodox Church

RFD discussion: September 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:United Nations Economic and Social Council.

title: Talk:Albanian Orthodox Church


text:
Talk:Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

RFD discussion: September 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:United Nations Economic and Social Council.


text:
Talk:Assyrian Church of the East

RFD discussion: September 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:United Nations Economic and Social Council.

title: Talk:Assyrian Church of the East


text:
Talk:ka-BLAOW

RFD discussion: September–December 2023

 * See Talk:KA-BLAOW.

title: Talk:ka-BLAOW


text:
Talk:Army of the Republic of Vietnam

RFD discussion: September 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:United Nations Economic and Social Council.

title: Talk:Army of the Republic of Vietnam


text:
Talk:United Nations General Assembly

RFD discussion: September 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:United Nations Economic and Social Council.

title: Talk:United Nations General Assembly


text:
포주

Etymology 1
.

Noun

 * 1) pimp

Etymology 2
.

title: 포주


text: CFTC

title: CFTC


text:
Берлускони

Etymology
From.

Etymology
From.

Declension
This noun is indeclinable

title: Берлускони


text:
pasammati

Etymology
..

Verb

 * 1) to become allayed, to cease, to fade away

title: pasammati


text: Category:Russian renderings of Italian surnames


text:
hahotázik

Etymology
. From, from obsolete , from a  onomatopoeic (sound-imitative) origin (compare 🇨🇬 and its descendants).

Verb

 * 1)  to laugh heartily, to laugh out loud, to laugh loudly, to guffaw

title: hahotázik


text:
upasammati

Etymology
..

Verb

 * 1) to grow calm
 * 2) to cease
 * 3) to be settled
 * 1) to be settled

title: upasammati


text:
Магомедов

Etymology
.

title: Магомедов


text: Hohlmass

title: Hohlmass


text:
Krisenmodus

Noun

 * 1) crisis mode

title: Krisenmodus


text: dermassen

title: dermassen


text:
cheemos

Noun

 * 1) uncle

title: cheemos


text: Потанин

title: Потанин


text: Category:Pali terms derived from the Sanskrit root उपशम्


text: Masslosigkeit

title: Masslosigkeit


text: Category:Terms derived from the Sanskrit root उपशम्


text: Anmassen

title: Anmassen


text:
උපසම‍්මති

Adjective

 * , which is, present active participle of the verb above

title: උපසම‍්මති


text: cheerlier

title: cheerlier


text: dàinig

title: dàinig


text:
Choulguine

Etymology
.

title: Choulguine


text:
enhorten

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) to exhort

title: enhorten


text:
Szulgin

Etymology
.

title: Szulgin


text: हाटो

title: हाटो


text: cheerfullier

title: cheerfullier


text:
poultryhouse

Noun

 * 1) A house for poultry (avian livestock), usually for chickens.

title: poultryhouse


text: poultryhouses

title: poultryhouses


text:
нафтовий

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  petroleum, oil

title: нафтовий


text: agúa

title: agúa


text: agúo

title: agúo


text: agúes

title: agúes


text: agúen

title: agúen


text:
میرا ایک سوال ہے

Phrase

 * 1) I have a question

title: میرا ایک سوال ہے


text:
मेरा एक सवाल है

Phrase

 * 1) I have a question

title: मेरा एक सवाल है


text:
კითხვა მაქვს

Phrase

 * 1) I have a question

title: კითხვა მაქვს


text:
awās

Etymology
Affixed.

Adjective

 * 1) clear, having clear insight.
 * 2) bright

title: awās


text:
tôi có một câu hỏi

Phrase

 * 1) I have a question

Usage notes

 * The pronoun is generic, an appropriate pronoun should be used according to the social situation, see Vietnamese pronouns.

title: tôi có một câu hỏi


text:
ꦮꦮꦱꦤ꧀

Etymology
Affixed.

Noun

 * 1) view
 * 2) opinion
 * 3) judgement

title: ꦮꦮꦱꦤ꧀


text:
braunäugig

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) brown-eyed

title: braunäugig


text:
洋菓子

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Western-style sweet

title: 洋菓子


text:
ꦮꦮꦱ꧀

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to view attentively

title: ꦮꦮꦱ꧀


text:
オコシ

Noun

 * 1) above
 * 2) north
 * 1) north

title: オコシ


text:
ꦩꦮꦱ꧀

Etymology
Affixed.

Verb

 * 1) to view attentively
 * 2) to observe
 * 3) to aim

title: ꦩꦮꦱ꧀


text:
Talk:jaw

Link to etymology discussion
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Etymology_scriptorium/2023/December#chaw_and_jaw

Nicodene (talk) 01:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:jaw


text:
avoir le cuir dur

Verb

 * 1)  to be pachydermic or pachydermatous
 * 2)  to be thick-skinned
 * 1)  to be thick-skinned

title: avoir le cuir dur


text:
avoir le cuir solide

Verb

 * 1)  to be thick-skinned; to have a strong stomach

title: avoir le cuir solide


text: szmatu

title: szmatu


text: szmatowi

title: szmatowi


text: szmatem

title: szmatem


text: szmaty

title: szmaty


text: szmatom

title: szmatom


text: szmatę

title: szmatę


text: szmatą

title: szmatą


text: szmatami

title: szmatami


text: szmatach

title: szmatach


text: szmato

title: szmato


text: miażdżycy

title: miażdżycy


text: miażdżycę

title: miażdżycę


text: miażdżycą

title: miażdżycą


text: miażdżyco

title: miażdżyco


text: arteriosklerozy

title: arteriosklerozy


text: arteriosklerozie

title: arteriosklerozie


text: arteriosklerozę

title: arteriosklerozę


text: arteriosklerozą

title: arteriosklerozą


text: arteriosklerozo

title: arteriosklerozo


text: ᜃᜆᜒᜊᜀᜇᜈ᜔

title: ᜃᜆᜒᜊᜀᜇᜈ᜔


text: miazgi

title: miazgi


text: miazg

title: miazg


text: miazgom

title: miazgom


text: miazgę

title: miazgę


text: miazgą

title: miazgą


text: miazgami

title: miazgami


text: miazgach

title: miazgach


text: miazgo

title: miazgo


text: Citations:tsirloneria

title: Citations:tsirloneria


text:
Republicrap

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  A Republican.

title: Republicrap


text: Republicraps

title: Republicraps


text: szmatławce

title: szmatławce


text: szmatławca

title: szmatławca


text: szmatławców

title: szmatławców


text: szmatławcowi

title: szmatławcowi


text:
εὔθυμος

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Of good spirit, happy, generous, kind

title: εὔθυμος


text: szmatławcom

title: szmatławcom


text: szmatławcem

title: szmatławcem


text: szmatławcami

title: szmatławcami


text: szmatławcu

title: szmatławcu


text: szmatławcach

title: szmatławcach


text: brukowce

title: brukowce


text: brukowca

title: brukowca


text: brukowców

title: brukowców


text: brukowcowi

title: brukowcowi


text: brukowcom

title: brukowcom


text: brukowcem

title: brukowcem


text: brukowcami

title: brukowcami


text: brukowcu

title: brukowcu


text: brukowcach

title: brukowcach


text:
유정

Etymology 1
.

Noun

 * 1) oil well

Etymology 2
.

Etymology 3
.

title: 유정


text:
Talk:nơi sinh

RFD discussion: May–November 2023
Vietnamese. SoP --ChemPro (talk) 11:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

 * I think this should be turned into a phrasebook entry. It’s SoP, but in a rather opaque way, and it’s very common on official forms and the like. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 03:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Converted to phrasebook in the absence of objections. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 01:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:nơi sinh


text:
Talk:pho tượng

RFD discussion: May–November 2023
Vietnamese. SOP; is a classifier. I should have done my research before creating this entry. --ChemPro (talk) 12:18, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

 * It appears more than a few people use as a noun that takes the classifier  (see the citations I added). Normally  + other classifier is only used in expletives (cái con khỉ) or with a demonstrative (cái cuốn sách kia). MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 02:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

, comments? MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 03:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Converted based on citations. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 01:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:pho tượng