text:
Talk:University of Vienna

Picture
Does anybody know if the | picture from univie.ac.at can be used for wikipedia?

Or is there any other (possibly brighter) picture, that could be added to this site.

 * There is a good picture on the German Wikipedia, which you could just upload to commons:. / up+land 17:19, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

"Full university" status
Is it entirely fair to describe it as "not a full university" has it has separated its medical section? Full university status in the UK does not require a medical school (although most of those that top rankings have one). Is this an Austrian convention? Wee Jimmy 00:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

 * The word “Universität” is often persceived as a description of the university of covering all sciences and arts (Wissenschaften). In old days, the University of Vienna was the only University in Vienna, other schools of higher education just being focussed on specific fields. Later other schools were named “Universität”, too, leading to confusion. “Technische Universität” was perceived as an oxymoron because a school can either be restricted to a field or universal, but not both. This might be a misunderstanding of the etymology of the word “Universität”. I have never heard of an official definition though.
 * Still, it is very complicated to say, for example, that you work at the University of Vienna, when someone asks which university you work at. You can just say something like THE univiersity, because the name “Universität Wien” does not contain any word to contrast it from the other “universities” in Vienna. – Hokanomono ✉ 10:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Still, it is very complicated to say, for example, that you work at the University of Vienna, when someone asks which university you work at. You can just say something like THE univiersity, because the name “Universität Wien” does not contain any word to contrast it from the other “universities” in Vienna. – Hokanomono ✉ 10:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Contradiction
Was the University founded in 1385 or 1365? Greenshed 11:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

In 1365, Rudolf IV sanctioned a deed of foundation for studies to doctoral level in Vienna on the model of the University of Paris. However, Pope Urban V did not ratify the deed to also found a Faculty of Theology, presumably due to pressure exerted by the Emperor who wished to avoid competition to Prague University. In 1384, papal agreement was finally received and Vienna University was extended to a full university, also including the fourth faculty, Theology. The first university building opened in 1385. versity of Pisa was founded in 1343, and that of Vienna in 1365. Why is it mentioned that the University of Vienna is the oldest in central europe?

 * The University of Vienna is the second oldest in Central Europe, behind Charles University in Prague, and this does not concern the University of Pisa because the University of Pisa is not located in Central Europe by any definition of the term. Elpato 21:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Is this the university, late 19th - early 20th C?
A gravestone, probably in Vienna's Zentralfriedhof, describes the deceased as "PROFESSOR AN DER WIENER UNIVERSITAT 1880 - 1912" – would this refer to the University of Vienna or need I seek further confirmation? -- Thanks, Deborahjay 12:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

 * Most probably yes. As far as I know the University of Vienna was at that time the only institution named "Universität" in Vienna, the other today's unversities were called "Hochschule" or other names or had not existed yet. Vheissu 16:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

copyediting
Please provide feedback on the new structure. A few statements were removed that did not fit. Check the edit history for more details. --Otheus 21:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I think this is done, except I can't make the last paragraph of 'Library History' work properly.

Nazi time
No word about the years 1938-1945. Xx236 (talk) 13:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC) A section could be added that Moritz Schlick was murdered in the univeristy (at the "Philosophen Stiege"). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.115.174.219 (talk) 20:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 'in 1938 the University of Vienna was reformed under political aspects and a huge number of teachers and students were dismissed for political and "racial" reasons' - rather an undersatatement.Xx236 (talk) 07:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Identification of people in 1853 picture
I have left a request here: en:Category talk:University of Vienna faculty but I'm not sure if that page is attended by actual persons or if it is autogenerated. Nevertheless, help is much appreciated. Power.corrupts (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

.

I have managed to identify the following persons in this 1853 image 9 - Ferdinand Ritter von Hebra 13 - Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky 14 - Josef Škoda

Johann Klein (1788-1856) was professor of obstetrics at the time and is likely in the picture

I somebody could help on this it would be much appreciated. Thanks, Power.corrupts 17:39, 26. Dez. 2008 (CET)

Sitting, from the left to the right: Dumreicher, Skoda, Rokitansky, Rosas, Schuh. Standing, from the left to the right: Dlauhy, Hebra, Helm, Oppoltzer, Brücke, Haller, Unger, Redtenbacher, Sigmund, Hyrtl. --84.113.222.201 11:29, 14. Jan. 2009 (CET), Vienna

 * Thanks!! But I think you start right (rechts) and go left (links), not the other way round, otherwise my own idenfitication (see numbers) would be wrong, and I would doubt that.  Could you please confirm.  I will copy the info into the image's Commons page, for reference.  Would you by any chance happen to know also the first name, could be useful for future articles.  I had hoped that Klein was in the picture, too bad.  Thanks again, Regards, Power.corrupts (talk) 17:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Oh well I discovered the names somewhere on the internet, but they were referring to an image which was mirrored. sorry for my inobservance. Moreover I found an image file including the names: . Concerning the first names I did some research- Sitting: Franz Schuh, Anton Rosas, Carl Rokitansjy, Josef Sokda, Johann Dumreicher. Standing: Joseph Hyrtl, Karl Sigmund, Josef Redtenbacher, Franz Unger, Haller (no idea, definively not 'Albrecht Haller' because this one lived from 1708 to 1777), Ernst Brücke, Theodor Oppoltzer, Helm (no idea), Ferdinand Hebra, Anton Dlauhy --84.113.222.201 (talk) 01:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

So, to sum it up: --UV (talk) 22:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

 * de:Josef Redtenbacher was professor at University of Vienna whereas his brother Ludwig Redtenbacher was professor at University of Prague (in 1860 Ludwig became head of government of the Museum of Natural History of Vienna but not professor at the university). For Karl Ludwig Sigmund I found this source : "Neumann (...) served as a resident with Hebra (...) within the Vienna academic community until he succeeded Karl Ludwig Sigmund (1810-1883) in the chair of dermatology and syphilis where he remained until his death". In addition I found Theodor Helm, he was professor at University of Pavia, later doctor at Vienna General Hospital and from 1855 to 1869 director of Vienna General Hospital. The first name of Haller is Carl, see : "(...) begann er mit Freunden und Kollegen – zunächst Franz Schuh (1804–1865) und Carl Haller, später kamen Joseph Redtenbacher (...)". And yes you are right, it is Johann Oppolzer and not his father Theodor. Above all it is not "Anton" Dlauhy, but Johann Dlauhy : "(...) war der Grundstein zum Wiener Institut für Gerichtliche Medizin gelegt. (...) Bernt blieb bis 1842 im Amt, seine Nachfolger waren Jakob Kolletschka (1843-1847) und Johann Dlauhy, der 1875 in den Ruhestand trat." Phew! --84.113.222.201 (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Apparently, there is both an Anton Dlauhy (1807–1888, see e.g. s:de:ADB:Dlauhy, Anton and a Johann Dlauhy (1808–1888). What makes you think we have Johann and not Anton here? --UV (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

 * You are right, it could be Anton too. But how about Benekeautobio.pdf Page 260, just found that --84.113.222.201 (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

 * I don't know, if anyone will read this, but I have to correct some informations: The picture shows some of the most important professors of the Viennese medical school 1853. The name of the picture given with "Vienna faculty" is just not correct.

The displayed persons are: from left to right, sitting: Schuh, Franz (17.10.1804-22.12.1865; Chirurgie) Rosas, Anton von (23.12.1791-31.05.1855; Augenheilkunde) Rokitansky, Carl Frh. v. (19.02.1804-23.07.1878; Pathologische Anatomie) Skoda, Josef (10.12.1805-13.06.1881; Innere Medizin) Dumreicher von Österreicher, Johann Heinrich v. (15.01.1815-16.11.1880; Chirurgie)

from left to right standing: Hyrtl, Josef (07.12.1810-17.07.1894; Anatomie) Sigmund v. Ilanor, Karl Ludwig (28.08.1810-01.02.1883; Dermatologie, Syphilidologie) Redtenbacher, Josef (12.03.1810-05.03.1870; Chemie, Medizin) Unger, Franz (30.11.1800-13.02.1870; Botanik, Pflanzenphysiologie) Haller, Carl (02.11.1809-03.09.1887; Chirurgie) Brücke, Ernst Wilhelm von (06.06.1819-07.01.1892; Physiologie, Anatomie) Oppolzer, Johann Ritt. v. (04.08.1808-16.04.1871, Pathologie) Helm, Theodor (12.05.1810-20.03.1875; Chirurgie) Hebra, Ferdinand v. (07.09.1816-05.08.1880; Dermatologie) Dlauhy, Johann Nepomuk H. (26.03.1808-29.07.1888; Patholog.Anatomie,Gerichtsmedizin,Staatsarzneikunde) - Sir Charles82 (talk) 17:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I have updated the image description page commons:File:Das Wiener Professoren Kollegium 1853.jpg accordingly. Greetings, --UV (talk) 21:09, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

History Section
For a university this old, it's surprising that the history section is so short. The history of the library is almost as long as the history of the whole university! If anyone can expand that section or link to references that include more historical information (in any language), that would be highly beneficial. -Mabeenot (talk) 03:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * http://www.univie.ac.at/university/history-of-the-university-of-vienna/?L=2 --UV (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Motto
The university has since 2012 or 2013 published some ads using the slogan „Neu. Seit 1365“ (see „Neu seit 1365“: Leistungsbericht und Wissensbilanz der Universität Wien 2012), but are there any sources that say this is the motto of the school? I don’t think so. This year, they use another slogan: „Wir stellen die Fragen“ (see Theresa Dirtl: Henne oder Ei?). The seal of the university says “s. sapientiae studii viennensis”. If the school has a motto at all, it might be that. --Babel fish (talk) 08:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Austria 50 Schilling 1965 Vienna University Silver Coin.jpg

title: Talk:University of Vienna


text:
Arnaud Denjoy

Arnaud Denjoy (5 January 1884 – 21 January 1974) was a French mathematician.

Biography
Denjoy was born in Auch, Gers. His contributions include work in harmonic analysis and differential equations. His integral was the first to be able to integrate all derivatives. Among his students is Gustave Choquet. He is also known for the more general broad Denjoy integral, or Khinchin integral.

Denjoy was an Invited Speaker of the ICM with talk Sur une classe d'ensembles parfaits en relation avec les fonctions admettant une dérivée seconde généralisée in 1920 at Strasbourg and with talk Les equations differentielles periodiques in 1950 at Cambridge, Massachusetts. In 1931 he was the president of the Société Mathématique de France. In 1942 he was elected a member of the Académie des sciences and was its president in 1962.

Denjoy married in 1923 and was the father of three sons. He died in Paris in 1974. He was an atheist with a strong interest in philosophy, psychology, and social issues.

The asteroid (19349) Denjoy is named in his honor.

Selected publications

 * Une extension de l'intégrale de Lebesgue, Académie des Sciences, pp. 859–862 (1912)
 * Les continus cycliques et la représentation conforme, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, pp. 97-124 (1942)
 * Sur les fonctions dérivées sommables., Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, pp. 161-248 (1915)
 * Introduction à la théorie de fonctions de variables réelles, vol. 1, Hermann 1937
 * Aspects actuels de la pensée mathématique, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, vol. 67, 1939, pp. 1–12 (supplément), numdam
 * Leçons sur le calcul des coefficients d'une série trigonométrique, 4 vols., 1941–1949
 * L'énumération transfinie, 4 vols., Gauthier-Villars, 1946–1954
 * Mémoire sur la dérivation et son calcul inverse, 1954, published by Éditions Jacques Gabay
 * Articles et Mémoires, 2 vols., 1955
 * Jubilé scientifique, 1956
 * Un demi-siècle de Notes académiques (1906–1956), 2 vols., Gauthier-Villars, 1957 (collection of Denjoy's essays)
 * Hommes, Formes et le Nombre, 1964

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Arnaud Denjoy


text:
User talk:.mau.

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Here are some links I thought useful:

 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library
 * Utilities
 * Cite your sources
 * Verifiability
 * Wikiquette
 * Civility
 * Conflict resolution
 * Neutral point of view
 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
 * Brilliant prose
 * Featured pictures
 * Boilerplate text
 * Current polls
 * Mailing lists
 * IRC channel

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. About, Help desk, and Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.

(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 16:20, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Cycnus/cygnus
Actually, the c spelling appears to be fairly common in classical Latin, and is closer to the Greek original. Not a biggie, though, either way. Regards T.a.k. 20:36, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Walden (lawyer) (January 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Walden (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jim Walden (lawyer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jim_Walden_(lawyer) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jim_Walden_(lawyer) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jim Walden (lawyer) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jim Walden (lawyer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:.mau.


text:
User talk:Bishonen/Antique toilet paper holder/to do

Topics still not covered include:
 * The role of the tph in the Viking discovery of America.
 * The Jewish dimension
 * Romanticism and the cult of al fresco relief
 * Art Deco tphs
 * Hispano-arabic tphs addressed
 * Anthropological perspective, Marcel Mauss: alliances forged (and loosened!) between the crowned heads of Europe through exchange of tphs in a gift-giving economy.
 * 20th century: the digital (paperless) tph. Addressed.

Topics to avoid at all costs:
 * Torah scrolls
 * Opus Dei tphs
 * Any reference to George W. Bush


text: Template:Molise

title: Template:Molise


text:
User:Keitaro-1988

This user name (keitar-1988 or keitaro_1988) "belongs" to Björn Larsson, Sweden (EU). I have changed it from the former username "dunderklumpen25".

[http://music.uk.launch.yahoo.com/lc/?rt=0&rp1=0&rp2=1669844333 My Yahoo! LAUNCH Station]

[ymsgr:sendIM?keitaro_1988 Chat with Me!]

title: User:Keitaro-1988


text:
Proxy fight

A proxy fight, proxy contest or proxy battle is an unfriendly contest for control over an organization. The event usually occurs when a corporation's stockholders develop opposition to some aspect of the corporate governance, often focusing on directorial and management positions. Corporate activists may attempt to persuade shareholders to use their proxy votes (i.e., votes by one individual or institution as the authorized representative of another) to install new management for any of a variety of reasons. Shareholders of a public corporation may appoint an agent to attend shareholder meetings and vote on their behalf. That agent is the shareholder's proxy.

In a proxy fight, incumbent directors and management have the odds stacked in their favor over those trying to force the corporate change. These incumbents use various corporate governance tactics to stay in power, including: staggering the boards (i.e., having different election years for different directors), controlling access to the corporation's money, and creating restrictive requirements in the bylaws. As a result, most proxy fights are unsuccessful; except those waged more recently by hedge funds, which are successful more than 60% of the time. However, previous studies have found that proxy fights are positively correlated with an increase in shareholder wealth.

Examples

 * An acquiring company, frustrated by the takeover defenses of the management, may initiate a proxy fight to install a more compliant management of the target.
 * Internal opponents to an impending takeover (viewing it will cut value or add much risk) may enter into a proxy fight. Such took place within Hewlett-Packard, before Carly Fiorina's management of that company in 2002 took over Compaq.
 * Absent any looming takeover, proxy fights emerge from shareholders unhappy with management, with or without legal and equitable derivative suit grounds, as with Carl Icahn's effort in 2005–06 to oust most the board of Time Warner.
 * An early history of proxy fighting, detailing such 1950s battles as the fight for control of some of the largest U.S. corporations, including the Bank of America and the New York Central Railroad, can be found in David Karr's 1956 volume, Fight for Control.

Key players
Due to their out-sized influence with many institutional investors, proxy advisors play a key role in many proxy fights. In many cases, the proxy firms end up determining the result of the contest. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 also gave the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the power to regulate the solicitation of proxies.  Some of the rules the SEC has since proposed, like the universal proxy, have been controversial because opponents have suggested that they would increase the amount of proxy fights.

title: Proxy fight


text:
User:Karolinjiann

Q: How many Bush Administration officials does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: None. There is nothing wrong with the light bulb; its conditions are improving every day. Any reports of its lack of incandescence are delusional spins from the liberal media. That light bulb has served honorably, and anything you say undermines the lighting effect. Why do you hate freedom?

title: User:Karolinjiann


text:
User talk:192.133.129.166

Feb 2005 - Apl 2006
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- 16:28, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Thue | talk 15:49, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Roy Benavidez. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 16:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Kevin Miller was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 16:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 16:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

September 2006
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to John Calvin, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --Flex 14:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Pope Leo X, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Chodorkovskiy  (talk)  14:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to John Wycliffe
Your recent edit to John Wycliffe (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Henry Hudson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger22 13:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

March 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Merlin, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sander123 13:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

Your edit to Magician (fantasy)
Your recent edit to Magician (fantasy) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Goldfritha 01:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sjones23 19:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo 20:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Arienh4(Talk) 17:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Because of your edits to Huldrych Zwingli you have been reported. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Arienh4(Talk) 17:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - TexasAndroid 17:26, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Huldrych Zwingli:
Your recent edit to Huldrych Zwingli (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 17:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. AngelOfSadness talk  17:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 20:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism to Theistic evolution
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Theistic evolution, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 14:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Peter III of Russia:
Your recent edit to Peter III of Russia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 18:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Alex Bakharev 02:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bird evolution, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bird evolution was changed by 192.133.129.166 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-12T14:24:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Bird evolution constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - ✰ ALLSTAR ✰ echo 14:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC))

April 2008
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. —C.Fred (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Henry IV of France has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 17:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Philip II of Spain constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 17:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Harding Academy (Memphis) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alexnia (talk) 14:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Otto von Bismarck, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Otto von Bismarck was changed by 192.133.129.166 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-14T17:14:24+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Walther Schwieger, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Walther Schwieger was changed by 192.133.129.166 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-01-29T15:05:52+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page John T. Scopes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Richard Winters has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 20:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page George Rogers Clark has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 19:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Talk:Football has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Fireproof (film). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Mother insult. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Falcon8765 (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Fireproof (film). Falcon8765 (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Prince Maximilian of Wied-Neuwied, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Prince Maximilian of Wied-Neuwied was changed by 192.133.129.166 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-09-28T19:06:31+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Enviroboy TalkCs 19:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Enviroboy TalkCs 20:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Enviroboy TalkCs 20:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Chocolate chip cookie has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 18:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Chocolate brownie. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps Talk •  Contribs 18:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chocolate brownie. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 18:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sitting Bull has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps Talk •  Contribs 16:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

 Will Beback   talk    18:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Teapot Dome scandal, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Teapot Dome scandal was changed by 192.133.129.166 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-01-08T17:56:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Teapot Dome scandal. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Teapot Dome scandal, you will be blocked from editing. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Leech has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. M aen K. A. Talk  17:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bzuk (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bzuk (talk) 00:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bzuk (talk) 00:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC).

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Bzuk (talk) 23:57, 22 February 2010 (UTC).

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Harvard University has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 1exec1 (talk) 18:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Pope Julius II has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing //  Talk  //  Contribs  16:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Johann Tetzel. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. The Thing //  Talk  //  Contribs  16:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Johann Tetzel. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Thing //  Talk  //  Contribs  16:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Johann Tetzel. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. - Happy sailor 16:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC) To edit, please create an account and log in

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org unblock-en-l] from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org email us] using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. Or you may use the form here. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken.

April 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephanie Cole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)</b>) 18:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Laron, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- jbergste (u) (t) (c) 02:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Separation of church and state with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tremors (film) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Separation of church and state with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Calabe1992 (talk) 14:06, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Separation of church and state. Calabe1992 (talk) 14:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

 * Aggressive repeat vandalism...11 times on the same article in a matter of minutes. North8000 (talk) 14:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

To edit, please create an account and log in

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Request an account. Alternatively, you may [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org email us] using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org unblock-en-l] from an email address listed on your school's website. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken.

Kuru  (talk)  14:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Kilopi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to L. Randolph Lowry III because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kilopi (talk) 21:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wedding. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Torreslfchero (talk) 16:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Sam Houston, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 17:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ashley thomas80. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Jealousy that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  AshLey  Msg 09:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to L. Randolph Lowry III, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 05:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to John Smith (explorer), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   Wikipelli <sup style="color:#7b68ee;">Talk   17:17, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to John Smith (explorer) with this edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sea photo <sup style="color:#3333cc;">Talk 19:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Wycliffe because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm Horseless Headman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Defibrillation  has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Horseless Headman (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Defibrillation. Horseless Headman (talk) 17:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Epinoia. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Authorship of Luke–Acts have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. - Epinoia (talk) 15:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Acts of the Apostles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of songs featured in Shrek have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Widr (talk) 20:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to DSV Alvin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 16:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:192.133.129.166