text:
Talk:Chris Matthews

Liberal
This edit seems problematic to me. It draws from a primary source, but for such labels it is preferable to see a representative sample of a preponderance of secondary sources. I'm not going to revert it (since it is accurate), but I'd welcome discussion on the matter. -- Scjessey (talk) 11:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Agreed that a preponderance of secondary sources is desirable. Also, I see nothing in the cited text that "confirms" Matthews is liberal.--JayJasper (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

 * In the transcript I referenced, close to the bottom, Matthews says "Well, I‘m a liberal, too." In the Glenn Beck article, the citation for calling him a conservative is an article in which Beck self-identifies as "a conservative with libertarian leanings", so I feel like both labels are equally fair. –CWenger (talk) 22:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

 * What goes on in one article has no bearing on what goes on in another. In the Glenn Beck article, a secondary source is writing about Beck's conservatism; however, in this article you have used a primary source instead. This is below the standard expected of a Biography of a Living Person. "Fair" has nothing to do with it. Unless a secondary source that is representative of mainstream media sources in general can be fan, this will likely be reverted again. -- Scjessey (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

 * I had a feeling primary versus secondary source was going to be raised. But I think this is a case where the guidelines are a bit misleading. The reason Wikipedia cautions against primary sources is because they can be easily misinterpreted. I don't think anybody will contend that I am misinterpreting Chris Matthews' words here (or even "interpreting" them at all). While the Beck reference is a secondary source (although it is "The American Conservative" and therefore can't be considered neutral), which is preferable, I argue the value of information provided is the same. And I disagree that "what goes on in one article has no bearing on what goes on in another." If this is an official Wikipedia policy please point me to it. This is only my opinion but since Wikipedia is somewhat flexible (except in certain circumstances), other articles can be a good starting point. It is important to me that people using Wikipedia see some symmetry in how people like Chris Matthews and Glenn Beck are treated. –CWenger (talk) 15:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

 * When you say "[t]his is only my opinion but since Wikipedia is somewhat flexible (except in certain circumstances), other articles can be a good starting point," this is meritless. The choice of the article on Glenn Beck as a kind of gold standard against which all other like articles are to be judged is thoroughly arbitrary. It is not the job of Scjessey or any other user to point to "official Wikipedia policy"; the onus of establishing grounds lies on the user who wants to make the change, although Scjessey was very kind to paste "official Wikipedia policy" below.

 * A much more convincing argument could be made that, on the basis of this article, that the "conservative" in the Glenn Beck article ought to be omitted. You might wish to do so, if the discrepancy bothers you. You would have my blessing.

 * Furthermore, it is impossible to determine whether you are interpreting Matthews' words correctly or incorrectly, and ultimately not relevant, for reasons I explain below. Treeemont (talk) 00:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

 * The only policy that matters is WP:BLP - "Material about living persons must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoiding original research." Basically, high-quality sources are expected. If in doubt, leave it out. Primary sources must be used sparingly, and this is an example of you using one to justufy the inclusion of what some people regard as a pejorative. You must find a secondary source that writes about Matthews being a liberal (that is representative of a preponderance of reliable sources), or it is simply not appropriate to include it in the article. -- Scjessey (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Omission
I got rid of it. Someone else can change it back if he or she wants, but I would ask that the user explain thoroughly how he has taken "the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoiding original research," since the burden is on him or her to show it.

There is a reason why phrases like "Republican senator," "Brazilian athlete," and "alkali metal" are verifiable, neutral, and do not involve original research: these are objective traits. Go to any worthy source in the world on the subject, and it will say that Bob Corker is a Republican senator, that Pelé was a Brazilian athlete, and that potassium is an alkali metal. We simply cannot on the same basis call Chris Matthews a "liberal."

That Matthews himself has called himself a "liberal" on one occasion is not grounds for putting the word in an encyclopedia article that at least strives to be serious. Slavoj Zizek has called himself a Stalinist, but that does not mean it would be either helpful or accurate to say at the beginning of his article that he is a "Stalinist philosopher." To do so would be to infer the meaning and the intention of such an utterance; even if this could be done satisfactorily, it would constitute original research, and is therefore not permissible.Treeemont (talk) 00:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

 * The entire section on Matthews political leanings is utter crap. Nothing more than an obvious attempt to cherry-pick sources and create footnote spam in order to support an ideological agenda. I'm not going to bother editing anything here but - yeesh people - this nonsense is why wikipedia is so unreliable on so many predictable topics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.229.156.230 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 1 September 2012
 * Thanks for sharing. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 02:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Fortunately, there is plenty of material attesting to Chris Matthews' political views. Some of the most probative coverage on Matthews' views actually ran in the Huffington Post, a reliable (if WP:BIASED) secondary source which shares some of Matthews' views, say, on Barack Obama. "Chris Matthews: “I Felt This Thrill Going Up My Leg” As Obama Spoke", Chris Matthews: Obama’s Speech Made Me Cry and Chris Matthews Gushes: “Obama Comes Along, And...This Is The New Testament”. There's no dispute that Matthews was an enthusiastic Obama supporter, and that he expressed that support in his journalistic writing (as opposed to, say, his memoirs).

 * "Obama supporter" isn't the same thing as "liberal" - Christopher Buckley, in a a Daily Beast article addressed to his famously conservative father William F. Buckley, Jr, endorsed Obama despite being best known for his centrist views. But it shouldn't be a strain to find more articles in WP:RS specifically identifying Matthews succinctly as a liberal. In fact, I think I'll do that today, schedule permitting. loupgarous (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

 * When I'm wrong, I admit it. Nothing in a reasonably objective secondary source (according to WP:BIASED standards) I could find on the Web calls Chris Matthews a "liberal". So I encourage editors convinced that Matthews is a liberal to either Drop the stick or look for themselves and remember that while Fox News is reliable on many topics it can be cited to support, both it and the Huffington Post are among the sources we must be cautious in using in biographies of living persons. They're both agenda-driven to some extent. I am choosing secondary sources which can be expected to report objectively on Chris Matthews, because WP:BLP says to do it that way, and we have a better article at the end of the day. loupgarous (talk) 22:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Dubious
A disputed edit describes Media Matters for America as "anti-conservative", citing http://mediamatters.org/p/about_us which does not use that description. Previous suggestions by the same editor are "conservative-targeting", "liberal" and "left-wing" (frequently, these descriptors replaced "progressive" in the link to Progressivism in the United States). For what it's worth, Media Matters for America describes the group as "a politically progressive media watchdog group that says it is 'dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media'." citing the same source. Comments? - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Here's the full text of the source in question:

 * Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

 * Launched in May 2004, Media Matters for America put in place, for the first time, the means to systematically monitor a cross section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation — news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible and that forwards the conservative agenda — every day, in real time.

 * Using the website mediamatters.org as the principal vehicle for disseminating research and information, Media Matters posts rapid-response items as well as longer research and analytic reports documenting conservative misinformation throughout the media. Additionally, Media Matters works daily to notify activists, journalists, pundits, and the general public about instances of misinformation, providing them with the resources to rebut false claims and to take direct action against offending media institutions.
 * As you can see from this, Media Matters mentions once that they politically identify themselves as "progressive" and mentions three times that their purpose is to correct what they view as "conservative misinformation." As they make no statement of any intent to correct misinformation from any other political ideology, it is fair to describe them as "conservative-targeting" or "anti-conservative." The edits referring to them as "liberal" or "left-wing" are also valid, since modern "progressives" also identify themselves as being politically left of center. However, for the purpose of describing Media Matters in a way that fits with their stated purpose, "conservative-targeting" or "anti-conservative" works better. Thoughts? - Battleax86 (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for discussing the issue. "Anti-conservative" is not the same thing as "comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation". The source says they are dedicated to looking for and correcting what they see as a problem. Your read has them as being against everything from the perceived source of that problem. Those who work to monitor, analyze and correct food poisoning are not "anti-food preparation and storage".
 * "Progressive" is not a synonym for "liberal" which is not a synonym for "left-wing". Our article on Media Matters for America has discussed this repeatedly. The working consensus there is to describe the group as "progressive". Perhaps you would like to re-join that discussion. So long as that issue is settled there, changing it here would create a pointless contradiction. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 00:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * We're not allowed to use one of our articles to either confirm or deny facts in another of our articles under WP:CIRCULAR. Please state the specific guideline stating that one of our articles may not contradict the other. Ideally, our articles would reflect a consensus among normally reliable sources on everything they say, but WP:SYNTH and WP:THETRUTH don't allow us to take such matters into consideration, but require us to use information in usually reliable sources without trying to synthesize or deduce a common truth.
 * Let's see what the liberal press has to say about Media Matters. In "What Happens to Media Matters in a Post-Hillary World?" by Clio Chang And Alex Shephard, The New Republic said:
 * "'Employees were asked to stay late or work on the weekends specifically to cover Clinton, which many felt came at the expense of other stories and the organization’s mission. Nearly every former staffer we spoke to felt that researchers, in particular, were underpaid and overworked, and that these problems often surfaced when they were forced to work on stories they felt were dubious. As one former staffer described it, “They were paying me $35,000 a year to watch Fox all the time and to do rotating shifts where I’d have to change from a day shift to a night shift every two weeks. It was just a miserable job...”"
 * "When it came to the organization’s research standards, most former staffers we talked to agreed that they were lowered when it came to Clinton-related content. One former staffer told us that, compared to “the amount of evidence we would have to collect to go after another story,” Clinton pieces had a “much lower bar. It literally just had to involve Hillary Clinton and that was it.” Another said that they often weren’t allowed to publish Clinton-related pieces “until they had been read by someone in leadership...”"
 * "Then there was James Carville’s guest column for the site. In his inaugural post, the longtime Clinton ally stated his intention was to use the space to defend the Clintons: “That’s what happens when you have one standard for the Clintons, and a different one for everybody else, which is why I’ll be writing regularly in this space.” (Bradley Beychok, who was president of Media Matters from 2013 until early December, and who was thought responsible for enforcing the site’s pro-Clinton bent, is close to Carville)'"
 * The New Republic was generally positive about Media Matters: "With the proliferation of conservative misinformation and the rise in popularity of far-right websites like Breitbart, there is a need for organizations like Media Matters now more than ever," but was scathing about their slant toward Hillary Clinton in the last Presidential campaign. Quoting The New Republic article again:
 * "' Media Matters derives its credibility from its objectivity—its posts are dry, often consisting almost entirely of transcripts that aim to show how conservative media is misleading the public. Media Matters is also classified as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit group in the tax code, which means that it cannot explicitly advocate for a political candidate. The organization is careful not to step over that line, always framing pieces with a media angle—for example, “New York Times’s Maureen Dowd Writes Yet Another Anti-Clinton Column.” But with Carville’s column, that veneer of objectivity was tossed aside. Media Matters also had one standard for the Clintons, and a different one for everybody else.'"
 * Media Matters is not merely a progressive organization devoted to debunking conservative misinformation. They actually risked losing their tax-deductible 501(c)(3) organizational status to pick up the cudgel for Hillary Clinton in the last Presidential campaign, not once, but continually during the campaign, even lending Clinton loyalist James Carville a column for that purpose.
 * We have that from The New Republic, which is unapologetically liberal, not NewsBusters or Accuracy in Media. loupgarous (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

 * I deleted the part of the article under Political career and views quoting Media Matters for America as saying Matthews was unduly anti-Hillary Clinton during her Presidential campaign, based on the credible report by The New Republic quoted above documenting that Media Matters for America had devoted considerable staff time not on debunking conservative inaccuracies but defending Hillary Clinton during her Presidential campaign, even giving one of her most prominent associates and apologists, James Carville, a regular column on the site for that purpose.
 * I had two choices here - either present information in the article impeaching Media Matters' reliablility on this score, which (as you can see) takes paragraphs, or delete a section that doesn't contribute to a comprehension of Chris Matthews in any constructive way. I chose to be WP:BOLD and delete that section. As you can see, this impeachment of Media Matters as a reliable source has been on the talk page since December 18th, 2017. Three weeks was plenty of time for anyone with concerns to dispute the information. loupgarous (talk) 19:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Tingles
The article currently alleges that Matthews' nickname is "Tingles", but no source is cited for that statement. . It seems that should be removed, no? -- →gab  24 dot  grab← 15:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed it should and has (as of this posting) been removed. Without reliable sources, it runs afoul of WP:V & WP:NOR. Not to mention it is a potential BLP violation.--JayJasper (talk) 18:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * He is often called "Tingles" in reference to his comment about Obama in 2008 and it is a well known quote he made. This particular mention today is probably due to the scuffle at the RNC when a MSNBC producer got upset that someone called Matthews "Tingles". It is kind of ironic since Matthews made multiple references to Seamus last night. I would say that it is not a violation of RS or V or NOR, but since it is used to mock Matthews it would be a BLP violation. Arzel (talk) 18:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Weasel much? Who are these people, and how often? Sources please! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? Arzel (talk) 04:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Without meaning to cut the pissing match short, we cannot say that "he is often called" whatever "in reference to" whatever without coverage in reliable sources saying exactly that. This contentious claim about a living person has been added, with no sources whatsoever, at least three times: twice by an IP and once by a single purpose account. If anyone is in any way unclear on this, please review our policy on biographies of living people. If the claim is re-added again without reliable sources (or with poor sourcing), it will be removed. If you have sources for this and wish to discuss how reliable those sources are or what wording would work, please feel free to discuss it here. Otherwise, we're pretty much done here. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * To be clear, I am not advocating it be used since it is a BLP violation, only that it would not be a violation of RS or V or NOR. I believe that Michele Bachmann was one of the first to use it as a retort to Matthews when he asked if she was hypnotized on his show. Since it would be a BLP violation, there is no point in discussing any sourcing as it would be a moot point. Arzel (talk) 05:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It would be permissible under Political career and views to cite Huffington Post's articles "Chris Matthews: “I Felt This Thrill Going Up My Leg” As Obama Spoke", Chris Matthews: Obama’s Speech Made Me Cry and Chris Matthews Gushes: “Obama Comes Along, And...This Is The New Testament”:
 * "'Matthews — who, in the past, has both cried over an Obama speech and compared him to Jesus — described exactly what happens to him when Obama speaks:"
 * "'I have to tell you, you know, it’s part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama’s speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often.''"
 * Under WP:BLP, we can see that all three Huffington Post articles linked to above are fair comment about notable statements by Chris Matthews about Barack Obama (notable because they indicate views he publicly expressed during news broadcasts), reported in a usually reliable secondary source. We'd be citing the Huffington Post articles with care to lend proper weight to the direct quotes of Mr. Matthews in each article by a politically sympathetic reliable source.
 * There's absolutely no WP:BLP issue with quoting the Huffington Post on simple statements they reported Chris Matthews as having made. Under WP:BIASED we'd only have to take care that the Huffington Post was not distorting the truth in any way.
 * By withholding statements in a normally reliable source like this from our readers, we're actually creating an article which is not balanced in its coverage of the subject. WP:BLP does not lay the obligation on us to write canonization pieces about subjects of our articles. loupgarous (talk) 23:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

 * Without tendentiously using a right-wing media meme for Chris Matthews, we can and should refer to this episode of Matthews' emotional advocacy for Barack Obama's 2008 Presidential campaign. It bears strongly on Matthews' political views, and most readers have heard the "tingles" meme without proper context. Nowhere did Matthews refer to a "tingle" running up his leg, but a "thrill". We have that from Huffington Post, which also described him as "gushing about Obama" and "comparing him to Jesus".
 * We ought to cover these statements by Matthews, because at present the article is loaded with defensive remarks like "I'm more conservative than people think", without telling the reader why some might think Matthews had some leftward political views. When the Huffington Post reports Matthews was a strong supporter of former President Obama, we can conclude this isn't a politically-motivated observation by the HP's editorial staff or their writers. When a reliable but leftward-WP:BIASED news source makes those statements about a fellow journalist who supported candidate they did, it's fair and verifiable comment fully compliant with WP:BLP. Comments? loupgarous (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

 * Ordinarily, I'd wait for comments before changing an article in significant part, but this change is so important to restoring balance to our article (making sure that the article cited to support Matthews' self-assessment as a "centrist" was cited in proper context - the author of that article strongly questioned Matthews' status as a "centrist" based on his statements as a journalist).
 * While I was doing that, I also cited the Huffington Post coverage of Matthews' emotional support for Barack Obama's 2008 Presidential campaign. The Huffington Post is a reliable secondary source, and no WP:BIASED issues exist with their coverage of Matthews. There is no objective dispute of this incident as reported in the article I cited, so no WP:BLP concerns.
 * I didn't make any conclusions regarding Matthews' political views in wikivoice, merely presented good secondary sources which commented on the subject, citing them in proper context - and presented what is mis-characterized as the "tingle" episode with direct reporting of what actually happened. Better we do that than seem to be concealing well-known incidents which relate to Matthews' political views, or actually mischaracterizing what is reported about those views by selectively and deceptively citing our sources. loupgarous (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

"Controversy"
"''On February 1, 2013, Matthews suggested that Senator John McCain's relentless questioning of defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel was due to suppressed anger over the Vietnam War stating, "Forty years after the Vietnam POWs came home, the most famous of them is angrier than ever. ... flashbacks must haunt still the mind and heart of John Sidney McCain. ... I'm absolutely convinced we're watching a flashback."''"

NOT

On February 1, 2013, Chris Matthews ridiculed the war service of Senator John McCain by saying "Forty years after the Vietnam POWs came home, the most famous of them is angrier than ever. ... flashbacks must haunt still the mind and heart of John Sidney McCain. ... I'm absolutely convinced we're watching a flashback."

This was sourced to newsbusters, now, it's The Daily Caller. Yes, partisan websites will find something to complain about with anything and everything that seems to come from the "other" side. That is not a "controversy". Imagine if the "controversy" section on Obama or Bush listed everything any opinionated blogger had to say about anything they said. I think we're going to need a bigger encyclopedia. Instead, we need a reliable source discussing the utterance as a "controversy". Right now, we have a website saying " [subject] said [statement] ". That is not a "controversy". That is a report that he...spoke. STOP THE PRESSES!!! CHRIS MATTHEWS SPOKE!!! - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 04:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

 * This is all just right-wing garbage. No serious media outlets have picked it up, so it can safely be excluded per WP:NPOV. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

 * I wonder if any mainstream source will ever take Matthews to course for his constant bashing of anyone on the right. Maybe it is because he expouses viritol on a nightly basis that no one thinks any differently of it. Arzel (talk) 16:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Well if people on the right didn't constantly open themselves up to be bashed, it wouldn't be an issue. McCain made an ass of himself (now normal for him) and Matthews called him out for it (normal for him too). Nothing worth writing about. -- Scjessey (talk) 16:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article, not for general discussion of the subject. You both know that. Knock it off. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 18:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Arguments that this "would" be news if a similar thing was said about a liberal are pointless here. Wikipedia is not about righting some perceived wrong. If it isn't seen as noteworthy by reliable sources, it does not belong here. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 02:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Verbal gaffes
Should there be a section about his frequent verbal gaffes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christophermart (talk • contribs) 02:49, 30 April 2014 (UTC) There are a lot, almost nightly on his show. It would help people better understand him from reading the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christophermart (talk • contribs) 02:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You can't really expect discussion when your edits to the article seem to indicate that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 03:26, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * SummerPhD, accusing someone of WP:NOT based on past conduct isn't constructive. We can mention Chris Matthews' verbal gaffes when/if usually reliable secondary sources comment on them (which would likely be the deal-breaker) and we can reach a consensus on how notable the gaffes are and whether they belong in an encyclopedia article.
 * Brandishing WP:NOT at another editor for past offenses for a suggestion one doesn't like is against WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL - the proper thing is to cite the proper procedure for going about it, especially obtaining a consensus. If a WP:NOT case like this came up asking for sanctions, I'd vote for WP:Boomerang, because the editor accused wouldn't be the only one not focused on making an encyclopedia. loupgarous (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chris Matthews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402125232/http://www.daemen.edu/news/Newsreleases/Pages/MSNBCAnchorChrisMatthewstoSpeakatDaemenCollegeApril19.aspx to http://www.daemen.edu/news/Newsreleases/Pages/MSNBCAnchorChrisMatthewstoSpeakatDaemenCollegeApril19.aspx
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thefoxnation.com/chris-matthews/2009/12/18/chris-matthews-im-liberal

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Dated material
All the gossip about Matthews' posturing (with Colbert, and elsewhere) for a senate race circa 2008/2009 had me fainting from tedium. I know that 2008 was a Wikipedia heyday, and I hate to tarnish that glorious year, but enough already, I think, in this case. — MaxEnt 20:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I dunno. While some of the detail is unnecessary, the facts are important. Maybe cut it down a bit? -- Scjessey (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm cutting it down considerably. Most of the detail is unnecessary and places WP:UNDUE weight on part of the subject's life which doesn't bear on his notability. We ought to tell readers that Matthews did consider a run for the Senate, but we can spare the reader that long paragraph detailing every step he took before deciding not to go ahead. None of that adds appreciably to the article. I'm with MaxEnt on this - my eyes were glazing over, too. loupgarous (talk) 19:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Crying over Obama
The material about him crying over Obama used too many external links inline with the text, and was a fairly large violation of WP:UNDUE. I have removed it. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants  Tell me all about it.  20:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I also restored the bit about the political leans of Matthews' guests as the edit summary (and a later comment at RSN) inaccurately claimed it was criticism of Matthews criticism of Clinton in 2016. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  20:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Why are you edit warring instead of using the talk page? ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  21:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You removed my text first, then mentioned your concerns. I followed your lead. You're not an admin, and are just as obliged to seek consensus as I am. If edit-warring's an issue. we're both guilty. loupgarous (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I started a discussion as soon as I made the edit. If you want to complain about my behavior, ANI is thataway. If you don't have anything to say to defend the notion that Matthews' emotional reactions are meaningful to his career in any way, then I don't know why you bothered to revert me at all. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  22:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Our remarks crossed in an edit conflict. I was just posting them:
 * Getting back to the article, when the Huffington Post mentions Chris Matthews' previous journalistic coverage of Obama and finds his previous emotional remarks notable enough to list them in a third article, he made the statement which was erroneously seized on by the right-wing press as "the tingle". there are two encyclopedic concerns present.
 * The first, of course, is that those remarks went out over the air and and are part of the historical record on Matthews' reporting. If we conceal or omit this episode, we slant our article away from an WP:NPOV account of Chris Matthews' career. You may not think that mention of Matthews' remarks are WP:DUE but you're in a minority. Plenty of others disagree with you and if we let you decide for us what's WP:DUE or not, it hurts the article's credibility.
 * The second, and less important issue, is to put the "tingle" meme to bed once and for all - Matthews never said it. I quoted Huffington Post on what he did say.
 * If you don't care for Huffington Post's mention of what Chris Matthews said during his job as a commentator on the 2008 Presidential elections, I don't know that we can make you happy and write an encyclopedia (as opposed to a press release that goes into loving detail about every aspect of Chris Matthews' life but what MSNBC and NBC paid him to do). loupgarous (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, between what you say here and what I saw when I googled, it makes sense to include the quote about the "thrill" going up his leg. If you trim the quote down to what Matthews said instead of the intro to the quote from the source, I'd be fine with it. Something like:
 * The Huffington Post reported on Matthews' emotional expression of support for Barack Obama during the 2008 Presidential election, quoting him as saying "I have to tell you, you know, it’s part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama’s speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often."
 * I think adding something about how the press picked up on that quote might be appropriate, as well, provided we can find an RS. All I found were a bunch of non-reliable sources. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  22:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * We can cite WP:BIASED sources verbatim on the morphing of "thrill" to "tingle" without lending wikivoice to them. That would be the smaller of many time-sinks in that job. But I don't think they add much to the article, and certainly don't justify either the article space concerned or our time as editors. Who, at the end of the day, cares about partisan media reaction to the statement? The light the statement itself throws on Matthews' emotional state on the campaign trail is more relevant to the article.
 * The reason Huffington Post led with that litany of Matthews' emotional responses on air regarding Obama is they decided it was notable (no by-lines on that article, which indicates it was something the editors went with). Mark Halperin was much more vocal about the lack of press objectivity regarding the Obama campaign in 2008. This wasn't me WP:SYNTHing those three remarks Matthews made into a sentence which (understandably) reads like an indictment of his objectivity. The editors of the Huffington Post did that, with respect to press coverage of a candidate they liked and supported. The quote reads as it reads. I didn't add wikivoice to it, and I won't trim it to make Matthews seem less emotional on the Obama campaign trail than he was. I just edit here, I don't frame narratives. Sorry. loupgarous (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Fuck it. Your version's less wordy and lurid. Let's go with it. loupgarous (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * For the record, I wasn't accusing you of adding wikivoice to the quote or anything, I was just saying that the quote from the source (which included the quote from Matthews) was too much detail. It's fine for the huffpo story, which was about Matthew's emotionality wrt Obama. Just not for this article. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  23:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * And, for the record, I was not proceeding from a right-wing agenda, and was going out of my way to demonstrate I wasn't pushing one. I admitted you were right about quoting Huffington Post's litany of Matthews' public emotes regarding Obama in its entirety, last time I posted here. A little WP:AGF goes a long way - accusing people of political agendas is for WP:AN/I, and requires proof. loupgarous (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Resignation?
For the article to characterize Chris Matthews' departure from MSNBC as a "resignation" or "retirement" is laughable. I don't watch the channel, but sources who saw or recorded his final episode say he suddenly announced his "retirement" during the middle of the show, and after the commercial break he was gone and another host was in his chair. He was unceremoniously fired, plain and simple.174.85.100.143 (talk) 01:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Arbitrary Tulsi Gabbard References
The "Television Talk Show Host" section details an interview that Matthews had with former congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, and she is again referenced at the end of the section as someone who wished Matthews well after his retirement. I don't see how either of these things are important enough to include here particularly given that there is no reference to Matthews at all in Gabbard's own (considerably longer) article. I think this section would be improved if both sentences were removed.

Kalveti (talk) 04:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Chris Matthews


text:
AutoHotkey

AutoHotkey is a free and open-source custom scripting language for Microsoft Windows, primarily designed to provide easy keyboard shortcuts or hotkeys, fast macro-creation and software automation to allow users of most computer skill levels to automate repetitive tasks in any Windows application. It can easily extend or modify user interfaces (for example, overriding the default Windows control key commands with their Emacs equivalents). The installation package includes an extensive help file; web-based documentation is also available.

Features
AutoHotkey scripts can be used to launch programs, open documents, and emulate keystrokes or mouse clicks and movements. They can also assign, retrieve, and manipulate variables, run loops, and manipulate windows, files, and folders. They can be triggered by a hotkey, such as a script that opens an internet browser when the user presses Ctrl on the keyboard. Keyboard keys can also be remapped and disabled—for example, so that pressing Ctrl produces an em dash in the active window. AutoHotkey also allows "hotstrings" that automatically replace certain text as it is typed, such as assigning the string "btw" to produce the text "by the way", or the text "%o" to produce "percentage of". Scripts can also be set to run automatically at computer startup, with no keyboard action required—for example, for performing file management at a set interval.

More complex tasks can be achieved with custom data entry forms (GUI windows), working with the system registry, or using the Windows API by calling functions from DLLs. The scripts can be compiled into standalone executable files that can be run on other computers without AutoHotkey installed. The C++ source code can be compiled with Visual Studio Express.

AutoHotKey allows memory access through pointers, as in C.

Some uses for AutoHotkey:
 * Remapping the keyboard, such as from QWERTY to Dvorak and other alternative keyboard layouts
 * Using shortcuts to type frequently-used filenames and other phrases
 * Typing punctuation not available on the keyboard, such as curved quotes (“…”)
 * Typing other non-keyboard characters, such as the sign × used for dimensional measurement (e.g. 10′×12′)
 * Controlling the mouse cursor with a keyboard or joystick
 * Opening programs, documents, and websites with simple keystrokes
 * Adding a signature to e-mail, message boards, etc.
 * Monitoring a system and automatically closing unwanted programs
 * Scheduling an automatic reminder, system scan or backup
 * Automating repetitive tasks
 * Filling out forms automatically
 * Prototyping applications before implementing them in other, more time-consuming programming languages

History
The first public beta of AutoHotkey was released on November 10, 2003, after author Chris Mallett's proposal to integrate hotkey support into AutoIt v2 failed to generate response from the AutoIt community. Mallett built a new program from scratch basing the syntax on AutoIt v2 and using AutoIt v3 for some commands and the compiler. Later, AutoIt v3 switched from GPL to closed source because of "other projects repeatedly taking AutoIt code" and "setting themselves up as competitors".

In 2010, AutoHotkey v1.1 (originally called AutoHotkey_L) became the platform for ongoing development of AutoHotkey. In late 2012, it became the official branch. Another port of the program is AutoHotkey.dll. A well known fork of the program is AutoHotkey_H, which has its own subforum on the main site.

Version 2
In July 2021, the first AutoHotkey v2 beta was released. The first release candidate was released on November 20, 2022, with the full release of v2.0.0 planned later in the year. On December 20, 2022, version 2.0.0 was officially released. On January 22, 2023, AutoHotkey v2 became the official primary version. AutoHotkey v1.1 became legacy and no new features were implemented, but this version was still supported by the site. On March 16, 2024, the final update of AutoHotkey v1.1 was released. AutoHotkey v1.1 has now reached its end of life.

Examples
The following script searches for a particular word or phrase using Google. After the user copies text from any application to the clipboard, pressing the configurable hotkey Win opens the user's default web browser and performs the search.

The following script defines a hotstring that enables the user to type afaik in any program and, when followed by an ending character, automatically replace it with "as far as I know":

User-contributed features
AutoHotKey extensions, interops and inline script libraries are available for use with and from other programming languages, including:

 * VB/C# (.NET)
 * Lua
 * Lisp
 * ECL
 * Embedded machine code
 * VBScript/JScript (Windows Scripting Host)

Other major plugins enable support for:

 * Aspect-oriented programming
 * Function hooks
 * COM wrappers
 * Console interaction
 * Dynamic code generation
 * HIDs
 * Internet Explorer automation
 * GUI creation
 * Synthetic programming
 * Web services
 * Windows event hooks

Malware
When AutoHotkey is used to make standalone software for distribution, that software must include the part of AutoHotkey itself that understands and executes AutoHotkey scripts, as it is an interpreted language. Inevitably, some malware has been written using AutoHotkey. When anti-malware products attempt to earmark items of malware that have been programmed using AutoHotkey, they sometimes falsely identify AutoHotkey as the culprit rather than the actual malware.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: AutoHotkey


text:
User talk:Htlin

Hsien-Ta Lin

title: User talk:Htlin


text:
Perfect Strangers (2003 film)

Perfect Strangers is a 2003 New Zealand film directed by Gaylene Preston and starring Sam Neill and Rachael Blake.

Plot
Melanie (Rachael Blake) is a waitress who works at an unnamed restaurant, presumably in New Zealand. One night, she meets a man (Sam Neill), they spend some time together, before Melanie asks him if he wants to go home. He says sure, and asks: "Your place or mine?" She answers with his, and they go to a dock, where his small boat is. After a short time, she passes out, and when she wakes up, they're in the middle of open ocean, with land nowhere in sight.

Cast

 * Sam Neill as The Man
 * Rachael Blake as Melanie
 * Robyn Malcolm as Aileen
 * Madeleine Sami as Andrea
 * Jed Brophy as Pete
 * Joel Tobeck as Bill
 * Paul Glover as Jim

Reviews

 * 2003 Chicago International Film Festival

title: Perfect Strangers (2003 film)


text:
Henri Cassini

Viscount Alexandre Henri Gabriel (vicomte) de Cassini (9 May 1781 – 23 April 1832) was a French botanist and naturalist, who specialised in the sunflower family (Asteraceae) (then known as family Compositae).

He was the youngest of five children of Jacques Dominique, Comte de Cassini, famous for completing the map of France, who had succeeded his father as the director of the Paris Observatory. He was also the great-great-grandson of famous Italian-French astronomer, Giovanni Domenico Cassini, discoverer of Jupiter's Great Red Spot and the Cassini division in Saturn's rings.

The genus Cassinia was named in his honour by the botanist Robert Brown.

He named many flowering plants and new genera in the sunflower family (Asteraceae), many of them from North America. He published 65 papers and 11 reviews in the [Nouveau] Bulletin des Sciences of the  Société Philomatique de Paris between 1812 and 1821. In 1825, Cassini placed the North American taxa of Prenanthes (family Asteraceae, tribe Lactuceae) in a new genus Nabalus. In 1828 he named Dugaldia hoopesii for the Scottish naturalist Dugald Stewart (1753–1828).

title: Henri Cassini


text:
Category:Thai films

This category is for films made within the Thai film industry.

title: Category:Thai films


text:
Talk:Baba Yaga

Add Thistlefoot Novel
In the modern culture section, I recommend adding the book Thistlefoot by GennaRose Nethercott. It is an expansive and important cultural retelling of the Baba Yaga myth. Link for nore info: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/673386/thistlefoot-by-gennarose-nethercott/ 2601:985:4201:EE0:611B:AC7B:9EE1:AFB0 (talk) 04:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Done. - Altenmann >talk 22:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Mussorgsky
Either in “Attestations” section or a new section called “In Classical Music” (?), there should be a reference to Mussorgsky’s piece Pictures at an Exhibition. The Emerson, Lake, and Palmer’s version referenced in Baba Yaga wiki wouldn’t exist if Mussorgsky hadn’t written the piano suite first! Mcksis (talk) 19:19, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Done. You could have done it yourself. BTW it has nothning to do with attestations. - Altenmann >talk 22:16, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * yaga river in mansi language, nation in Siberia/ Yagach ass in turkish languages 176.65.114.68 (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Andreas Johns
Undue for the lede and no place to move it in the article

Scholar Andreas Johns identifies Baba Yaga as "one of the most memorable and distinctive figures in eastern European folklore", and observes that she is "enigmatic" and often exhibits "striking ambiguity". Johns summarizes Baba Yaga as "a many-faceted figure, capable of inspiring researchers to see her as a Cloud, Moon, Death, Winter, Snake, Bird, Pelican or Earth Goddess, totemic matriarchal ancestress, female initiator, phallic mother, or archetypal image". Ben Azura (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

 * There's always a place. I placed it near the other mention of Johns. Maybe another place would be even better, but this should do. Gawaon (talk) 19:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Awesome. Thanks for finding a place for it. Ben Azura (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Baba Yaga


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Åkesoft

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 04:57, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

%C5kesoft
Delete This entry regards a non-notable company and a stub entry to boot. My google search returned only 7 entries. --BenWilson 17:08, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, not encyclopedic. Wyss 21:00, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mikkalai 07:08, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Åkesoft


text:
User:Harryy

Templates

Hi, I'm Harry from bg.wikipedia.

title: User:Harryy


text:
User:Cardinal biggles

Cardinal Biggles is a librarian from Philadelphia with entirely too much time on his hands. His interests include reading, writing, the study of history, and watching various TV shows and movies including Star Trek, NYPD Blue, and James Bond.

title: User:Cardinal biggles


text:
Croatian cuisine

Croatian cuisine is heterogeneous and is known as a cuisine of the regions, since every region of Croatia has its own distinct culinary tradition. Its roots date back to ancient times. The differences in the selection of foodstuffs and forms of cooking are most notable between those in mainland and those in coastal regions. Mainland cuisine is more characterized by the earlier Slavic and the more recent contacts with Hungarian and Turkish cuisine, using lard for cooking, and spices such as black pepper, paprika, and garlic. The coastal region bears the influences of Greek and Roman cuisine, as well as of the later Mediterranean cuisine, in particular Italian (especially Venetian). Coastal cuisines use olive oil, herbs and spices such as rosemary, sage, bay leaf, oregano, marjoram, cinnamon, clove, nutmeg, and lemon and orange rind. Peasant cooking traditions are based on imaginative variations of several basic ingredients (cereals, dairy products, meat, fish, vegetables, nuts) and cooking procedures (stewing, grilling, roasting, baking), while bourgeois cuisine involves more complicated procedures and use of selected herbs and spices. Charcuterie is part of the Croatian culinary tradition in all regions. Food and recipes from other former Yugoslav countries are also popular in Croatia.

Croatian cuisine can be divided into several distinct cuisines (Dalmatia, Dubrovnik, Gorski Kotar, Istria, Lika, Međimurje, Podravina, Slavonija, Zagorje) each of which has specific cooking traditions, characteristic of the area and not necessarily well known in other parts of Croatia. Most dishes, however, can be found all across the country, with local variants.

Meat and game

 * Specialities from the grill are called s roštilja, those roasted on the spit s ražnja
 * pečeno means roasted
 * prženo means fried
 * pod pekom means that the dish has been put into a stone oven under a metal cover. The cook puts hot coals on the cover so that the meal is cooked slowly in its own juices. Specialties cooked pod pekom include lamb, veal, and octopus.
 * na lešo means boiled in broth or water (lamb, beef, fish)

Croatian meat-based dishes include:

 * Pork
 * Miješano meso or Ražnjići (skewers)
 * Zagrebački odrezak (Veal steaks stuffed with ham and cheese, breaded and fried)
 * Šnicle (schnitzel) – breaded veal, pork or chicken cutlets
 * Meso z tiblice – pork ham from Međimurje County
 * Janjetina – roasted lamb garnished with Mediterranean herbs
 * Pag lamb (Paška janjetina)
 * Dalmatian lamb (Dalmatinska janjetina)
 * Odojak – roasted suckling pig
 * Fresh game from Dalmatia
 * Turkey with mlinci (flat pasta, soaked in roast juices)
 * Buncek – smoked pork hock, used in bean, sauerkraut or kale stews
 * Leg of lamb à la Pašticada
 * Leg of venison the count's way
 * Wild duck with sauce
 * Polpete, ćufte, faširanci – Frikadeller

 * Roasted pheasant
 * Kotlovina from Samobor (kettle with knuckle of pork and other meat and sausages)
 * Boiled fillet of beef haunch with Sauerkraut
 * Escalope à la Baron Trenk (spicy-rolled Schnitzel)
 * Međimurje Goose (stuffed with buckwheat)
 * Turopolje Goose (with corn semolina as a side dish)
 * Purgerica Turkey (Christmas dish from the bordering region to Zagreb, turkey filled with chestnuts, apples, bacon, lemons, etc.)
 * Krvavice, or čurke, blood sausages, made of blood and kaša
 * Hladetina, a particular type of head cheese
 * Edible dormouse

Seafood

Croatian seafood dishes include:

 * Squid – Croatian: lignje, grilled, fried, stuffed or prepared as stew and served with polenta
 * Octopus salad – Croatian: salata od hobotnice; octopus can also be prepared brudet style, with red wine, or baked pod pekom
 * Cuttlefish risotto – Croatian: ''Crni rižot'
 * Tuna
 * Scampi – Croatian: škampi
 * Common mussels – Croatian: dagnje
 * Salted cod is imported, but dishes are very popular for Christmas Eve or on Good Friday. It can be prepared either as bakalar na bijelo (Dubrovnik, Dalmatia and Istria, with olive oil and garlic, with or without potatoes), or as bakalar na crveno, in tomato-based stew, with potatoes.
 * Fish stew – Croatian brodet or brudet (Dubrovnik and Dalmatia), best made with several type of fish (red rascasse, European conger, monkfish, European hake)

 * Clams
 * Sea spider salad
 * Breaded catfish or carp
 * Grilled sardines or other fish (na gradele)
 * Salted anchovies or sardine (slana riba) are served as hors d'oeuvres or as a part of light supper with povrće na lešo, salads etc.
 * Buzara (shellfish sautéed in garlic, olive oil, parsley & white wine)
 * Date shells or prstaci are part of the traditional cuisine, but in the 20th century their extraction was banned as a measure of ecological protection

Stews
Stewed vegetables with a small amount of meat or sausages (varivo or čušpajz) is perceived as a healthy, traditional meal. Sour cream (in Northern Croatia) or olive oil (on the coast) can be added to the plate just before serving. Stewed meat dishes are often prepared by men in open spaces, following hunting and shepherding traditions. In Dalmatian urban cuisine, spices such as cinnamon and clove, Swiss chard (known as "blitva"), dried plums, dried figs, apples and other fruit are sometimes added to meat stews.

 * Slavonian čorbanac (Croatian: Čobanac is a traditional meat stew originating from Slavonia and Baranja, located in the eastern part of Croatia. The dish is traditionally prepared by slowly cooking all of the ingredients for several hours in a large copper pot that is strung over an open fire.Typically, it consists of a few different types of meat, from veal and beef to wild game meat, along with large quantities of onions, and a special blend of sweet and hot ground paprika which gives the stew its characteristical rich and vivid color.)
 * Grah – pork hock bean stew (often done as grah i zelje – with sauerkraut, or grah s kiselom repom – with pickled turnip strings)
 * Gregada - seafood stew
 * Varivo od mahuna – green beans stew
 * Riblji paprikaš – also called fiš-paprikaš (spicy fish stew from Slavonia
 * Slavonska riblja čorba (fish stew from Slavonia)
 * Brudet (or Brodet) – fish stew
 * Chicken stew
 * Rabbit goulash
 * Ričet, also known as jačmik, orzo

 * Istrian stew (Jota)
 * Pašta fažol – bean stew with small pasta
 * Shepherd's Stew
 * Feines Venison goulash with prunes
 * Hunter's stew
 * Wine goulash
 * Sauerkraut stew
 * Zelena menestra – traditional cabbage and meat dish – Dubrovnik and surrounding area
 * Pašticada – Dalmatian beef stew with prunes and dried figs
 * Tripe stew (tripice, fileki)

Pasta

Pasta is one of the most popular food items in Croatian cuisine, especially in the region of Dalmatia. Manistra na pome (pasta with tomato sauce) is a staple. The other popular sauces include creamy mushroom sauce, minced meat sauce and many others. Fresh pasta (rezanci, krpice) is added to soups and stews, or prepared with cottage cheese, cabbage, even with walnuts or poppy seed. Potato dough is popular, not only for making njoki (gnocchi), but also for making plum or cheese dumplings which are boiled, and then quickly fried in breadcrumbs and butter.

 * Žganci – cornmeal dish in Slovenian and Northern Croatian cuisine, also known as polenta (palenta, pura) in Istria and Dalmatia
 * Gnocchi, often served with pašticada or goulash
 * Fuži, a typical pasta from Istria
 * Needle macaroni

 * Štrukli – baked or cooked filled pastry from Zagorje, Zagreb area.
 * Krpice sa zeljem – pasta with stewed cabbage
 * Šporki makaruli – traditional pasta with cinnamon-flavored meat sauce, from Dubrovnik and surrounding area

Soups
Soup is an integral part of a meal in Croatia and no Sunday family meal or any special occasion will go without it. The most popular soups are broth-based, with added pasta or semolina dumplings. They are usually light in order to leave space for the main course and dessert to follow. However, cream or roux-based soups are also popular, and there are many local variations of traditional soups. In Dalmatia, fish soup with fish chunks, carrots and rice is commonly served.

 * Maneštra
 * Veal soup with smoked meat
 * Beef broth with vermicelli pasta
 * Mushroom soup, especially with porcini
 * Dill soup
 * Zagorska juha with porcini mushrooms, bacon, sweet pepper
 * Pretepena juha od graha, beans cream soup
 * Prežgana juha
 * Chicken soup

Side dishes

 * Sataraš (sliced and stewed summer vegetables)
 * Mlinci (typical northwest Croatian roasted flatbread, similar to Caucasian flatbreads)
 * Đuveč (baked summer vegetables, similar to ratatouille)
 * Knedle (are boiled dumplings)

Other

 * Zagrebački odrezak – breaded escalope stuffed with ham and cheese, type of cordon bleu
 * Punjena paprika – peppers filled with minced meat (Turkish: dolma)
 * Sarma – Sauerkraut rolls filed with minced pork meat and rice
 * Arambašići from Sinj – similar to Sarma, but made with finely diced beef and without rice
 * Lepinje – flat bread
 * Wild truffles, served on pasta, risotto, or fried eggs (fritaja)
 * Croatian olive oil (Maslinovo ulje)
 * Paški baškotin – aromatic zwieback (rusk) from the Island of Pag

 * Potatoes from the region of Lika (Lički krumpir) – high-quality, large, red potatoes
 * Sauerkraut from the Varaždin region
 * Cabbage (zelje) from the region of Zagreb
 * Artichokes with peas or broad beans
 * Slanina - cured slabs of pork subcutaneous fat with or without skin and with or without layers of meat
 * Fritaja with asparagus
 * Gorski kotar filling (pieces of ham with eggs and bread)
 * Čvarci - kind of pork cracklings, with fat thermally extracted from the lard

Sausages and ham

 * Kulen (Kulin) – spicy pork sausage from Slavonia
 * Češnjovka – spicy pork sausage with a harmonious garlic taste from Turopolje
 * Kobasica – spicy, air-dried or smoked sausage (Hungarian: kolbász)
 * Salami from Samobor
 * Švargl from Slavonia

 * Istrian and Dalmatian Pršut – dry-cured ham
 * Ćevapčići
 * Panceta from Dalmatia
 * Špek from continental Croatia
 * Kaštradina – smoked mutton or goat meat
 * Ombolo

Cheese (sir)

 * Paški sir – sheep's milk cheese from the island of Pag
 * Farmers' cheese (škripavac) and curd cheese from the regions of Kordun and Lika
 * Cheese from the Cetina region (Cetinski sir)
 * Cheese from the Island of Krk (Krčki sir)
 * Cheese from Međimurje (turoš)
 * Cheese from Podravina (prga)
 * Cottage cheese (eaten with cream, vrhnje) from Zagorje (sir i vrhnje, often seen as quintessential Croatian traditional food)

Savoury pies

 * Viška pogača is a salted sardine-filled focaccia from the island of Vis.
 * Soparnik is a Dalmatian chard-filled pie.
 * Duvanjska pita, made from thin phyllo dough wraps filled with potato and meat.

Pastry

 * Pita
 * Pogača (farmers' bread)
 * Povitica

 * Bučnica (summer squash and cottage cheese pie, can be savory or sweet)
 * Štrukli (made with cottage cheese, sour cream and eggs, can be savory or sweet, boiled or baked)
 * Zlevanka, simple baked cornmeal pastry with various fillings (e.g. cheese, sour cream, cherries, plum jam, walnuts, nettle)
 * Varaždinski klipići

Sweets and desserts

 * Palačinke (crepes) with sweet filling (Hungarian: palacsinta, German: Palatschinken)
 * Piškote/Piškoti — thin, light, sweet delicate, crispy cookie
 * Baklava
 * Kremšnita – vanilla slice or custard slice, is a custard and chantilly cream cream cake dessert
 * Doboš — sponge cake layered with chocolate buttercream and topped with caramel (Hungarian: Dobos torta)
 * Šaumšnita –
 * Zagorski štrukli – sweet pastry from northern Croatia
 * Uštipci
 * Fritule
 * Knedle – also known as gomboce are potato dough dumplings, usually filled with plums and rolled into buttered breadcrumbs
 * Strudel (Croatian: savijača or štrudla) with apple or curd cheese fillings
 * Orahnjača and Makovnjača – sweet breads with walnut or poppy seeds
 * Croatian honey
 * Bear's paw
 * Farmer's cheese (quark) cakes (cream cake)
 * Krafne, pokladnice – a type of doughnut
 * Croatian pancakes (with wine and egg sauce)
 * Šnenokli, paradižot (meringue in custard cream, floating island (dessert))
 * Almond filled ravioli (rafioli)
 * Homemade fruit preserves, jams, compotes
 * Čupavci (lamingtons)
 * Tiramisu

Cakes (kolači)

 * Rožata or Rozata (flan, creme caramel)
 * Easter pastry Pinca
 * Kroštule (crunchy, deep-fried pastry)
 * Fritule (deep-fried dough, festive pastry, particularly for Christmas)
 * Bishop's bread
 * Guglhupf ring cake (Croatian kuglof)
 * Rapska torta (Rab cake)
 * Međimurska gibanica (Međimurje County layer cake with apple, poppyseed, walnut and cottage cheese fillings)
 * Makarana torta
 * Imotska torta
 * Mađarica (Croatian layer cake)

Wines
Croatia has 3 main wine regions: Continental (Kontinetska), Coastal (Primorska) which includes the islands and Slavonia.Croatia’s northeastern-most region.The old wine cellars in Ilok date back to the 15th and 18th centuries. It is interesting that the famous Ilok Traminac was ordered by the English Court for the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. Also, one interesting story coming from one of the employees who save a place during the Homeland War, more precisely during the Serbian occupation of Ilok, when he decided to enclose the wall of one part of the Old Cellar and store it as many as 8,000 most valuable archival wines.

Each of the main regions is divided into sub-regions which are divided yet further into smaller vinogorje, (literally "wine hills") and districts. Altogether, there are more than 300 geographically defined wine-producing areas in Croatia.Istria, Konavle and Pelješac were recognised by Vogue as the best ones in Croatia. There are numerous enological events (fairs) throuought the year (for ex. Vinistra ).

In parts of Croatia, wine, either red or white, is sometimes consumed mixed with mineral water or juices. For example, in Hrvatsko zagorje and Međimurje, popular combination is white wine and mineral water (mostly Jamnica), called gemišt (German: gemischt, ”mixed”, "mixture"). On the other hand, in Dalmatia is popular bevanda (Italian: bevanda, "drink"), mix of vine and natural water. Bevanda is common gastronomical motif in cultural representations of Dalmatia and its people in popular culture.

Dessert wines

 * Sweet Malvazija
 * Muškat Ottonel (see: Muscat grape)
 * Prošek
 * Traminac

White wines

 * Rajnski Rizling
 * Žlahtina, Vitis vinifera from Vrbnik (Vrbnik polje) at the Krk island, also known as "Vrbnička žlahtina”
 * Malvazija
 * Graševina

Red wines

 * Babić
 * Plavac Mali
 * Postup
 * Frankovka

Beers (pivo)
Apart from imported beers (Heineken, Tuborg, Gösser, Stella Artois, etc.), there are home-brewed and locally brewed beers in Croatia. A brewery based in Split produces Bavarian Kaltenberg beer by licence of the original brewery in Germany.

 * Karlovačko: brewed in Karlovac
 * Ožujsko: brewed in Zagreb (the name refers to the month of March)
 * Pan
 * Favorit: from Buzet, Istria
 * Vukovarsko: from Vukovar
 * Osječko: from Osijek (oldest brewery in Croatia)
 * Tars pivo: from the seaport city of Rijeka
 * Tomislav: dark beer from Zagreb
 * Velebitsko pivo: brewed near Gospić on the Velebit mountain, the dark beer has been voted best beer by an English beer fan website.

Liqueurs and spirits

 * Maraschino
 * Rakija (Croatian name for spirits), commonly made from: Lozovača / Loza (grapes) (it.: Grappa),Travarica (Loza with herbs), Šljivovica (plums), Kruškovac (pears), Drenovac (cherries)
 * Pelinkovac
 * Orahovac (walnut liqueur)
 * Medovina (honey)
 * Gvirc (as Medovina, only more alcohol).

Coffee
Croatia is a country of coffee drinkers (on average 5kg per person annually), not only because it was formerly part of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, but also because it bordered the former Ottoman Empire. Traditional coffee houses similar to those in Vienna are located throughout Croatia.

Mineral water
Regarding its water resources, Croatia has a leading position in Europe. Concerning water quality, Croatian water is greatly appreciated all over the world. Due to a lack of established industries there have also been no major incidents of water pollution.
 * Jamnica – Winner of the Paris AquaExpo for best mineral water of 2003
 * Lipički studenac
 * Jana – also belongs to Jamnica, best aromatized mineral water (Eauscar 2004)

Juices and syrups

 * Badel
 * Jamnica
 * Maraska

 * Dona
 * Vindija juices – Vindi sokovi
 * Cedevita
 * Zvečevo

Protected products
There are 46 Croatian agricultural and food products whose name is registered in the European Union as a protected designation of origin or a protected designation of geographical origin (European mark of authenticity by the European Commission).

 * Cheese
 * Bjelovarski Kvargl
 * Lički škripavac (from Lika)
 * Pag cheese (from Pag island)

 * Honey
 * Goranski medun (from Gorski kotar)
 * Slavonski med (Slavonian honey)
 * Zagorski bagremov med (from Hrvatsko zagorje)

 * Meat
 * Baranjski kulen
 * Dalmatinska janjetina (Dalmatian lamb)
 * Dalmatinska panceta
 * Dalmatinska pečenica
 * Dalmatinski pršut
 * Drniški pršut
 * Istarski pršut (Istrski pršut)
 * Lička janjetina (Likan lamb)
 * Krčki pršut
 * Malostonska kamenica
 * Međimursko meso ‘z tiblice
 * Meso istarskog goveda – boškarina (Meso istrskega goveda – boškarina; Meat of Istrian cattle – Boškarin)
 * Paška janjetina (lamb from Pag island)
 * Samoborska češnjovka (Samoborska češnofka; smoked saussage from Samobor)
 * Slavonska crna svinja (Slavonian black pig, hr )
 * Slavonski kulen (Slavonski kulin; Slavonian kulen/kulin)
 * Zagorski puran (turkey meat from Hrvatsko zagorje)

 * Fruits and vegetables
 * Brački varenik
 * Neretvanska mandarina
 * Komiški rogač (Komižan carob)
 * Lički krumpir (Likan potato)
 * Ogulinsko kiselo zelje/Ogulinski kiseli kupus
 * Varaždinsko zelje

 * Olive oils
 * Bračko maslinovo ulje
 * Ekstra djevičansko maslinovo ulje Cres
 * Korčulansko maslinovo ulje
 * Krčko maslinovo ulje
 * Šoltansko maslinovo ulje

 * Other oils
 * Varaždinsko bučino ulje (Varaždin pumpkin seed oil)

 * Pastry
 * Lumblija (aromatic sweet bread)
 * Poljički soparnik (Poljički zeljanik or Poljički uljenjak)
 * Rudarska greblica
 * Varaždinski klipič
 * Zagorski mlinci
 * Zagorski štrukli (Zagorski štruklji)

 * Sea products
 * Novigrad Mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis cultivated in farms in the Novigrad Sea and Novsko Ždrilo
 * Paška sol (sea salt from Pag island)

title: Croatian cuisine


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wall hacks

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge with Wallhack. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:40, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Wall hacks
non-notable, maybe merge with something? Rmhermen 17:12, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

 * Redirect to Wallhack. Xezbeth  17:49, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. The subject is notable. Jeltz talk  18:03, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect agree with Xezbeth and Jeltz above. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 18:08, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, as above. Rje 18:12, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Wallhack. --Matteh (talk) 23:08, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Wallhack. Megan1967 08:00, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Cornwall Island (Nunavut)

Cornwall Island is a small, uninhabited island in the high Arctic region of the Canadian territory of Nunavut. It is near the geometric centre of the Queen Elizabeth Islands. To the north, it is separated from Amund Ringnes Island by Hendriksen Strait. To the south, it is separated from Devon Island by Belcher Channel. It is the largest of six islands (the others being Buckingham, Ekins, Exmouth, Graham Island, and Table) in Norwegian Bay, west of Ellesmere Island.

Cornwall Island measures about 90 km long and 30 km wide, and has an area of 2358 km2.

The tallest peaks are McLeod Head at 400 m, and Mount Nicolay at 290 m, both on the north coast. Coast features include Northeast Point and Gordon Head to the east; Pell Point and Cape O'Brien to the south; and Cape Butler in the southwest.

The first known European sighting of the island was by Sir Edward Belcher on 30 August 1852, and was named in honour of Prince Edward, Prince of Wales and Duke of Cornwall.

title: Cornwall Island (Nunavut)


text:
Perfect Strangers (1950 film)

Perfect Strangers, also released as Too Dangerous to Love in some territories, is a 1950 American comedy-drama film directed by Bretaigne Windust. Edith Sommer wrote the screenplay from an adaptation written by George Oppenheimer, based on the 1939 play Ladies and Gentlemen by Charles MacArthur and Ben Hecht. The film stars Ginger Rogers and Dennis Morgan as two jurors who fall in love while sequestered during a murder trial. Thelma Ritter, Margalo Gillmore, and Anthony Ross co-star in supporting roles.

The film was released by Warner Bros. on March 24, 1950, and received mixed to negative reviews from critics.

Plot
Terry Scott (Ginger Rogers), who is separated from her husband, and unhappily married David Campbell (Dennis Morgan), the father of two children, meet when they are selected to serve on the jury of the Los Angeles trial of Ernest Craig (Ford Rainey). The defendant is charged with murdering his wife when she refused to grant him a divorce. David attempts to get out of being a juror. Terry Scott attempts to persuade the rest of the jury that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty. While sequestered during the lengthy proceedings, Terry and David get to know each other and fall in love. Some dramatic tension is added to the plot by juror Isobel Bradford (Margalo Gillmore), a snobby socialite who tries to sway the panel to vote for the death penalty. Due to the mix of personalities, and cramped quarters, other tensions, some comical, arise between the fellow jurors.

Cast

 * Ginger Rogers as Theresa "Terry" Scott
 * Dennis Morgan as David Campbell
 * Thelma Ritter as Lena Fassler
 * Margalo Gillmore as Mrs. Isobel Bradford
 * Anthony Ross as Robert "Bob" Fisher
 * Howard Freeman as Arthur Timkin
 * Alan Reed as Harry Patullo
 * Paul Ford as Judge Byron
 * Harry Bellaver as Bailiff
 * George Chandler as Lester Hubley
 * Frank Conlan as John Brokaw
 * Charles Meredith as Lyle Pettijohn
 * Marjorie Bennett as Mrs. Moore
 * Edith Evanson as Mary Travers
 * Sumner Getchell as John Simon

Unbilled (in order of appearance)

 * Ford Rainey as Ernest Craig
 * Whit Bissell as Defense attorney
 * Ned Glass as O'Hanlon
 * Creighton Hale as Reporter
 * Frank Marlowe as Reporter
 * Frank Cady as Geologist
 * Isabel Withers
 * Weldon Heyburn

Production
Production on the film took place from late June to early August 1949. The film marked a reunion between Rogers and Morgan, who had previously co-starred together as lovers in the highly successful Kitty Foyle; since that pairing, Rogers had notably become a free agent in Hollywood. Margalo Gillmore was a friend of Ladies and Gentleman writers Hecht and MacArthur.

Critical reception
The film received mixed reviews from critics. In his review in The New York Times, Bosley Crowther described the film as "modest entertainment" of which "the limits of plausibility are unmistakably stretched"; The romance elements were negatively reviewed, a much different reception than the Rogers/Morgan pairing had received for Kitty Foyle. A review for Rotarian magazine said the storyline "lacks motivation and hence will not claim much of your sympathy." Crowther had similar feelings, stating "Miss Rogers and Mr. Morgan are pretty dreary throughout the film. However, their fellow jurors are a remarkably entertaining lot, picturesque in theatrical fashion, and the minor salvation of the show." Crowther did, however, praise Windust's direction, stating that "in spite of the weak script, Bretaigne Windust has done the best with his batch of characters... Jerry Wald, who produced for Warners, should thank him more than the writers, one and all."

title: Perfect Strangers (1950 film)


text:
Mathematical Reviews

Mathematical Reviews is a journal published by the American Mathematical Society (AMS) that contains brief synopses, and in some cases evaluations, of many articles in mathematics, statistics, and theoretical computer science. The AMS also publishes an associated online bibliographic database called MathSciNet, which contains an electronic version of Mathematical Reviews.

Reviews
Mathematical Reviews was founded by Otto E. Neugebauer in 1940 as an alternative to the German journal Zentralblatt für Mathematik, which Neugebauer had also founded a decade earlier, but which under the Nazis had begun censoring reviews by and of Jewish mathematicians. The goal of the new journal was to give reviews of every mathematical research publication. As of November 2007, the Mathematical Reviews database contained information on over 2.2 million articles. The authors of reviews are volunteers, usually chosen by the editors because of some expertise in the area of the article. It and Zentralblatt für Mathematik are the only comprehensive resources of this type. (The Mathematics section of Referativny Zhurnal is available only in Russian and is smaller in scale and difficult to access.) Often reviews give detailed summaries of the contents of the paper, sometimes with critical comments by the reviewer and references to related work. However, reviewers are not encouraged to criticize the paper, because the author does not have an opportunity to respond. The author's summary may be quoted when it is not possible to give an independent review, or when the summary is deemed adequate by the reviewer or the editors. Only bibliographic information may be given when a work is in an unusual language, when it is a brief paper in a conference volume, or when it is outside the primary scope of the Reviews. Originally the reviews were written in several languages, but later an "English only" policy was introduced. Selected reviews (called "featured reviews") were also published as a book by the AMS, but this program has been discontinued.

Online database
In 1980, all the contents of Mathematical Reviews since 1940 were integrated into an electronic searchable database. Eventually the contents became part of MathSciNet, which was officially launched in 1996. MathSciNet also has extensive citation information.

Mathematical citation quotient
Mathematical Reviews computes a mathematical citation quotient (MCQ) for each journal. Like the impact factor and other similar citation rates, this is a numerical statistic that measures the frequency of citations to a journal. The MCQ is calculated by counting the total number of citations into the journal that have been indexed by Mathematical Reviews over a five-year period, and dividing this total by the total number of papers published by the journal during that five-year period.

For the period 2012 – 2014, the top five journals in Mathematical Reviews by MCQ were:

 * 1) Acta Numerica — MCQ 8.14
 * 2) Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS — MCQ 5.06
 * 3) Journal of the American Mathematical Society — MCQ 4.79
 * 4) Annals of Mathematics — MCQ 4.60
 * 5) Forum of Mathematics, Pi — MCQ 4.54

The "All Journal MCQ" is computed by considering all the journals indexed by Mathematical Reviews as a single meta-journal, which makes it possible to determine if a particular journal has a higher or lower MCQ than average. The 2018 All Journal MCQ is 0.41.

Current Mathematical Publications
Current Mathematical Publications was a subject index in print format that published the newest and upcoming mathematical literature, chosen and indexed by Mathematical Reviews editors. It covered the period from 1965 until 2012, when it was discontinued.

title: Mathematical Reviews


text:
Dubbing (music)

In sound recording, dubbing is the transfer or copying of previously recorded audio material from one medium to another of the same or a different type. It may be done with a machine designed for this purpose, or by connecting two different machines: one to play back and one to record the signal. The purpose of dubbing may be simply to make multiple copies of audio programs, or it may be done to preserve programs on old media which are deteriorating and may otherwise be lost.

One type of dubbing device combines two different storage media, such as an audio cassette deck that incorporates a Compact Disc recorder. Such a device enables the transfer of audio programs from an obsolete medium to a widely used medium. It may also simply be used to transfer material between two types of media which are popular in different settings, so that material originating in one type of environment can be used in another. An example of the latter would be the dubbing of a Digital BetaCam videocassette to DVD.

Another type of dubbing device is designed to rapidly produce many copies of a program. It may combine a single playback unit with multiple recording units to simultaneously create two, four, eight, sixteen, or more copies during the playback of a single original program. This type of device can often perform the copying process at many times the standard playback speed. Typical multiplexed dubbing decks of either analog (cassette) or digital (CD) programs can operate at 48 times the standard playback speed, thus producing complete copies of a program in sixty or ninety seconds. Sometimes this high-speed dubbing incurs some loss of quality compared to the best normal (1×) speed dub.

The verb "dub" as used here long predates and is unrelated to the Jamaican musical style dub music; the origin of both words stems from the dubplate. It is also different with the term dubbing, which is mostly a type of frottage dance usually found in the Caribbean clubs.

Victor S/8

Some of the earliest dubbings were made by the Victor Talking Machine Co. In 1916, Victor developed an acoustical dubbing process to create new masters from pressings where damage had occurred to the originals. Such dubbings are marked with the symbol “s/8” stamped in the inner rim. These are occasionally (but not always) noted in the New York files. Pressings made from these dubbed masters are sonically inferior to the originals.

title: Dubbing (music)


text:
Talk:Croatian cuisine

Untitled
Thought it wuld be nice to have a page with differnent food specialities from Croatia, since this country really has a hh lot to offer that is so far unknown to the big wide world. Please be free to change or add antything You want (I am not even quite sure if some translations are correct in English, so please change wrong or weird-sounding entries). It would be nice if we could create a complete list of specialities, recipies, etc. User: Neoneo13 — Preceding undated comment added 17:15, 9 February 2005 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Croatian cuisine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100217092545/http://www.badel1862.hr/en_default.asp to http://www.badel1862.hr/en_default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Croatian cuisine