text:
Saint Francis D'Assisi High School

Saint Francis D'Assisi High School is a school for boys located in IC Colony, Borivali West, Mumbai, India.

Overview
The school is managed by the Franciscan Missionary Brothers, a Catholic religious society founded by Paulus Moritz, a German missionary. The school is recognized by the State Government of Maharashtra. It was established in 1908 and it is one of the largest high schools in Maharashtra, India.

In 2023, the Principal is Brother Backyanathan.

In 2023, the high school has 8,000 students from Standards 1 to 10. The school is affiliated with the Council of Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE) and the Maharashtra Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education. The school follows the SSC curriculum.

The school holds minority status and preference is given to children belonging to the Catholic minority community of the area.

The school is located on Mt. Poinsur, with a chapel located on the summit of the hill. It has two open air grounds on campus used for school assemblies, wedding ceremonies, cultural programs and movie shoots, as well as a 5-acre playground adjoining the adjacent Our Lady of Immaculate Conception Church, Mt. Poinsur.

As well as the high school and junior college, there is also a boarding school on campus. The school also runs an orphanage/residential institution for homeless children.

The institute also runs an engineering college under the University of Mumbai and a management wing affiliated to Yashwantrao Chavan Open University.

History
The history of St. Francis D'Assisi School and Orphanage dates back to 1908. Sebastian Pereira, Archbishop of Daman, who had his see at Colaba, Bombay and knew the Franciscan Missionary Brothers, visited Paulus-Moritz, Superior General of the CMSF to start an apostolic activity for the welfare of poor children of the Diocese of Bombay. He selected the location at Mt. Poinsur (known then as Mandpeshwar). Mortiz took up residence in the balcony of the run-down church of the Immaculate Conception on 4 October 1908.

St. Francis Junior College was established in 1975. The college offers classes in Science and Business and these are taught in the English language.

In 1985 when the school had completed 75 years Giani Zail Singh, the then President of India, attended the celebrations. Saint Francis D'Assisi had its centenary celebrations in 2008 attended by former President of India, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam.

In 2008 the college became co-educational. The college now follows the ICSE curriculum.

title: Saint Francis D'Assisi High School


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studnet

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was ambiguous. 5 clear "delete", 5 "merge". Failing to reach a clear concensus to delete, the decision defaults to merge. Rossami (talk) 00:35, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Studnet
Seems to be an advert of some type, capitalizing on a misspell, something that could be done about a billion times, Delete .--User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:46, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Okay, I'm new to this.  This is my first contribution, so please forgive the protocol.  I entered this because I've seen the phenomenon countless times on slashdot and other boards and found it interesting, as interesting as cow orker definitely.  It is certainly not an advert (what would it be advertising?)  Furthermore, a simple google search on the word reveals the commonality and fortuitousness of the typo word: "Results 1 - 10 of about 33,600 for studnet" is what I get.  I feel this is a valid and entertaining contribution to the wikipedia.  --User:redfenix
 * Welcome to Wikipedia. No one disputes this is a common typo, but so what?  There are lots of typos, shall we create articles for them all?  Why?  What use would that be to anyone?  Delete.. Gamaliel 05:02, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Consider the term cow orker. What use is it?  It's a typo as well (with only 18,900 google hits, I should add.) and it's a valid wikipedia article.  The use for both of these terms are for amusement and internet culture.  Also, they both demonstrate the amusement that can be derived from common interactions over the net and common mishaps from which many entertaining conversations have sprung.  Sure, they're both typos.  Sure, thousands upon thousands of typos can be found online.  However, not many offer some form of humor--some respite from the droning of articles, conversations, and listings that appear before us daily.  If other typos have been witnessed and chuckled over by as many netizens as studnet or cow orker then perhaps they should have articles as well.  These words are not just typos, but recurring humorous tidbits seen throughout the internet.  Frankly, I personally was so surprised that it wasn't in the wikipedia already that I actually decided to become a participant just to add it.  --User:redfenix
 * Delete or Merge with some article discussing common "mis-spells" that really aren't. For example, "cow orker" is a way of subtly offending one's co-worker. However, what import is there to 'studnet?' --BenWilson 19:39, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge on Typographical error page. — RJH 21:23, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. GRider\talk  22:06, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (couldn't think of a clever typo). Josh Cherry 01:39, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Typographical error. Megan1967 05:44, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay, merge and redirect to typo. I can agree with that.  --Redfenix 06:39, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I condensed it slightly, to enable myself to vote merge/redirect. Kappa 19:26, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * merge/redirect Bart133 (t) 05:17, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Deltee. I don't beleive every tpyo should haev its own aritcle. Carrp | Talk 15:01, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studnet


text:
Messerschmitt Me 209

The first Messerschmitt Me 209 was a single-engine racing aircraft which was designed for and succeeded at breaking speed records. This Me 209 was a completely new aircraft whose designation was used by Messerschmitt as a propaganda tool. Although the aircraft was designed only to break speed records, it was hoped that its name would associate it with the Bf 109 already in combat service.

The designation Me 209 was given for propaganda purposes to cause confusion with the Messerschmitt Bf 109, the Luftwaffe's primary fighter throughout World War II. It was later reused for the actual proposed successor to the Bf 109.

Design and development
The designation Me 209 was used for two separate projects during World War II. The first was a record-setting, single-engined race aircraft, for which little or no consideration was given to adaptation for combat. The second Me 209 was a proposal for a follow-up to the highly successful Messerschmitt Bf 109 which served as the Luftwaffe's primary fighter throughout World War II.

Designed in 1937, the Me 209 was a completely separate aircraft from the Bf 109, solely designed to break speed records. It shared only its Daimler-Benz DB 601 engine with the Bf 109, which in the Me 209 was equipped with steam cooling. Willy Messerschmitt designed the small aircraft with a cockpit placed far back along the fuselage just in front of its unique cross-shaped tail section. Unlike the Bf 109, the Me 209 featured a wide track, inwardly-retracting undercarriage mounted in the wing section.

Testing

The aircraft achieved its purpose when test pilot Fritz Wendel flew it to a new world speed record of almost 756 km/h (469 mph) on 26 April 1939, bearing the German civil registration D-INJR. This record was not officially broken by another piston-engined aircraft until 16 August 1969 by Darryl Greenamyer's highly modified Conquest I F8F Bearcat, now at the Smithsonian's NASM. The Me 209 V1's speed record was itself shattered in terms of absolute speed, thirty months later by Heini Dittmar, flying another Messerschmitt aircraft design, the Me 163A V4 rocket fighter prototype to a 1,004 km/h (624 mph) record in October 1941.

The idea of adapting the Me 209 racer to the fighter role gained momentum when, during the Battle of Britain, the Bf 109 failed to gain superiority over the RAF Supermarine Spitfire. The little record-setter, however, was not up to the task of air combat. Its wings were almost completely occupied by the engine's liquid cooling system and therefore prohibited conventional installation of armament. The aircraft also proved difficult to fly and extremely hard to control on the ground. Nevertheless, the Messerschmitt team made several attempts to improve the aircraft's performance by giving it longer wings, a taller vertical stabilizer, and installing two synchronized 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 17 machine guns in the engine cowling. Its various modifications, however, added so much weight that the Me 209 ended up slower than the contemporary Bf 109E. This first Me 209 project was soon cancelled.

Propaganda use
The Me 209's designation was used by Messerschmitt as a propaganda tool. Although the aircraft was a "single purpose" high-speed experimental prototype, it was hoped that its name would associate it and its world-beating performance with the Bf 109 already in combat service.

In 1939, the speed record achievement of the Me-209 was used for a propaganda disinformation campaign, wherein the aircraft (possibly from its post-July 1938 first flight date) was given the designation Me 109R, with the later prefix, never used for wartime Bf 109 fighters. This disinformation was naturally designed to give an aura of invincibility to the Bf 109, an aura not dispelled until the conclusion of the Battle of Britain.

Surviving aircraft
The fuselage of the Me 209 V1 is currently on display, at the Polish Aviation Museum in Kraków, Poland and was once a part of Hermann Göring's personal collection.

title: Messerschmitt Me 209


text:
Talk:Edward Scissorhands

Conflicting Information
The article says that Michael Jackson was Tim Burton's first choice, then goes on to say that Johnny Depp was always Tim Burton's first choice... — Preceding unsigned comment added by RickO5 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Good article nominee
Please review this article, and if you seek improvements, contact me so it can be promoted to GA status. Go to Good article nominations. Wildroot (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

GA review
I really don't see the harm in that. Wildroot (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC) Actually it's more professional using their last names first as does every other encyclopedic literature does the same. Wildroot (talk) 15:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC) That be all - feel free to comment if you disagree. M3tal H3ad (talk) 05:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * First of when mentioning who is in the film in the lead keep it simple such as - The film features Johnny Depp as the eponymous Edward, and also stars Winona Ryder, Dianne Weist, and Anthony Michael.
 * It also has a - remove also
 * Edward Scissorhands was a hit for Burton commercially and critically - International BO results please : )
 * and has become a beloved film amongst both children and adults - This could be considered POV as it is an opinion. There are adults and children who love every film - and those who hate films
 * "Edward Scissorhands." Name should not be in quotes
 * We are introduced to local - Do not use "We"
 * Possible in the plot section tell us who plays who rather than have it in the lead such as "saleswoman Peg Boggs (Diane West) as"..
 * Eventually, Jim attempts to implicate - remove eventually
 * No need to link Christmas
 * We then cut back - as above with the "We"
 * After casting every other character, Burton still had Edward - "Burton still had Edward" is confusing, i know what you mean but it should be reworded
 * "lack of virility." - quotes go inside the fullstop when it's only a word or two - full sentence quotes have the quotes outside
 * Johnny Depp has since become Burton's muse, appearing in seven of his other films - Just Depp - "Muse"? remove "other"
 * [citation needed] tag
 * During pre-production on Beetlejuice felt her to be perfect - word missing
 * remove link to dollars
 * newest, hottest and youngest director - POV and opinion
 * spent 12 weeks - Sixty different houses - keep consistent numbers or words
 * Sixty different houses had to be repainted for - they didn't "have to be" painted, Burton chose to paint them - Sixty different houses were repainted for
 * Do you think the expansion tag should still be there?
 * to compose the score - link score
 * "toss it out." - quote inside - as with "even harder than Batman."
 * Should Main Titles/The Suburban Theme/scores be in italics quotes or be normal?
 * remove link to America
 * Grammy Award Nomination - lowercase n
 * BAFTA win for Best Production Design, BAFTA award for best..
 * Italics for Entertainment Weekly in references
 * Authors last name comes first for references so Roger Ebert -> Ebert, Roger
 * wasn't, wouldn't, couldn't, can't, wasn't, wouldn't, wasn't, wasn't should be spelt out - was not, would not, was not etc

"Kim, refusing to believe this, hastens to enter the mansion. She reunites with Edward, and Jim follows to mansion. There, she reunites with Edward. Jim follows them and attempts to kill his rival." I don't think there's actually four sentences of information in here... but I'm not clear on the editing process, and hesitant to just jump in and clean it up. 169.229.121.229 (talk) 00:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)DF

Not to mention that it says "reunites with Edward" twice - she reunited with him twice? 163.192.21.43 (talk) 06:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I removed the duplication, but as you said there are too many sentences and they aren't well linked. (210.49.178.166 (talk) 07:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC))

I made some changes....
I noticed that the 'plot' section of this article was extremely messy. The sequence was completely out of order and it jumped around a lot. I know the film quite well and this retelling of the plot was misleading and confusing. I changed the order of a few of the sentences so that it now makes sense, but unfortunately these have now been put back to the way they were previously. I would much appreciate it if this was rectified as I believe it i now too messy and confusing, and not at all an accurate portrayal of the film. (Little cupcake 13 (talk) 15:40, 21 April 2008 (UTC))
 * WP:MOSFILMS specifies we don't have to describe the film's plot in the same order. I think the plot section is fine considering the first two paragraphs each focus on how Edward is treated by the family and the wider community before describing the story's events. Alientraveller (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I understand that the retelling of the plot does not need to be in the same order as the film, however it is very confusing to read, especially if someone has never seen the film. By retelling in a more correct order would make the article more readable and more understandable. I understand the idea of retelling the plot by seperating it into focussing on how Edward is treated by other characters and then telling the events of the film. However by writing it this way it seems to repeat a lot of points and seems nonsensical. The way this article is written seems as though it is written by someone who has never seen the film, instead simply writing a rehash of a review they saw in a newspaper. If you want to emphasise they way Edward is treated by other characters and then focus on the actual events of the film, you should create another section for this. Maybe titled Relationships between characters, or something. (Little cupcake 13 (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC))

- >Edward is arrested and released when a psychological examination reveals that his isolation allowed him to live without a sense of reality and common sense. >>Why 'allowed'? 'Made' or 'forced'. It's а reason, not a consequence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.153.171.143 (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

clean up
Maybe it is just because I woke up from a short nap on my day off from camp, but it seems that the grammar throughout this article is unusual if not incorrect or somewhat incoherent. I myself might edit it at some point if I have the time, but if anyone else wants to take a shot at it, feel free.  Valley 2 city  23:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

In the third paragraph of the lead section, we are told that the film injected over $6 million into the Tampa Bay local economy. Then in the second paragraph of the section "Filming", we are told the film injected over $4 million into the Tampa Bay local economy. Granted, over $6 million is 'over $4 million'; still, it would be nice if the figures jibed. Sandinog (talk) 15:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Matthew Bourne version
Someone should write up a section on the Matthew Bourne ballet version, it's amazing! TR Wolf (talk) 04:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Apart from a link to Matthew Bourne's official website, there's no mention at all of the stage show. I haven't seen it and know very little about it, but I feel its existence warrants a paragraph, if not its own page. Does someone who's familiar with the stage show want to have a go? Dom Kaos (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Comedy?
I'd say it's more drama/fantasy. Dunno, it's more subtly ironic than comedic, and most of the absurd or funny moments are actually rather sad seeing how scared or confused Edward gets. Also, it's a quite tragic film, not only in the ending but through the whole plot. I don't agree on the “comedy” part of the definition. 80.35.16.144 (talk) 17:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

I concur, comedy is too strong of a word to describe this movie and it should not be labeled as such. Orbzon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC).
 * It's a comedy-drama. The whole premise is kinda absurd and funny if you think about it. A man with scissors for hands falls in love with a suburban girl. Then again, I guess that can be taken a little dramatic. Wildroot (talk) 13:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

the possibility to recognize him as a real trajic clown. So it's a poetic tale a fairy tale either, and related to the clown tradition somehow comical.--Danaide (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It#s the question of how you categorise the character of Edward. The comparisons are zombie or monsterlike, but there is

Contradiction in article
The lead refers to Burton talking about growing up in Burbank. In the body where it talks about the film's development, it says it was in the Santa Clarita Valley. I don't which is correct, but Burbank is in the San Fernando Valley, not the Santa Clarita Valley, so the two sentences contradict one another. 64.124.27.3 (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Jim or Kim?
Is it Jim or Kim who asks Edward to break into Jim's house? There's been a bit of back-and-forth about this. DonIago (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Edward Scissorhands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080511180136/http://www.saturnawards.org/past.html to http://www.saturnawards.org/past.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Edward Scissorhands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5yVVFYMsr?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thehugoawards.org%2Fhugo-history%2F1991-hugo-awards%2F to http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/1991-hugo-awards/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/10top10.pdf?docID=381&AddInterest=1781

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Edward Scissorhands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/1991-hugo-awards/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101121001355/http://www.timburtoncollective.com/articles/es7.html to http://www.timburtoncollective.com/articles/es7.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Edward Scissorhands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114190639/http://www.goldenglobes.org/browse/film/23998 to http://www.goldenglobes.org/browse/film/23998
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121016142715/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/140670-Edward-Scissorhands-Tim-Burtons-Dark-Fairy-Tale-Tested-as-a-Play-in-Brooklyn to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/140670-Edward-Scissorhands-Tim-Burtons-Dark-Fairy-Tale-Tested-as-a-Play-in-Brooklyn

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

'Dark fantasy'?
Not mentioned in Allmovie, Box office mojo, or the majority of RT reviews, so doesn't seem to have due weight for WP:FILMLEAD. A google search of 'Edward scissorhands dark fantasy' also suggests a difficulty in finding reliable sources for it. I recommend removing 'dark', or replacing it with 'gothic (fiction)' since that seems to be mentioned frequently. Barely made one (talk) 01:48, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

2006 vandalism and Ed Wood
The page in 2006, a lot of content was removed, and it was never fixed. I am interested in one of the lines removed: "Tim Burton stated that he named the lead character Edward because of its similarity to the name Ed Wood." Any references to this?  - Jay Talk 12:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Depp's costuming discomfort?
The article states: "Depp's wardrobe and prosthetic makeup took one hour and 45 minutes to apply." I'm surprised that it did not take more time. I am wondering, though, how much discomfort was involved with the costume and prosthetics. Whether the outfit was leather or vinyl, it must have been hot with the tight cinching, especially under the lights required; likewise, his skin under the heavy make-up. The scissor-hands prosthetics must have required practice and exercise in order to build up Depp's hand muscles so they wouldn't tire and cramp during filming. Was there any mention in the trade journals about these topics? Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 19:27, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Edward Scissorhands


text:
Alternative trading organization

An alternative trading organization (ATO) is usually a non-governmental organization (NGO) or mission-driven business aligned with the Fair trade movement, aiming "to contribute to the alleviation of poverty in developing regions of the world by establishing a system of trade that allows marginalized producers in developing regions to gain access to developed markets".

Alternative trading organizations have Fair Trade at the core of their mission and activities, using it as a development tool to support disadvantaged producers and to reduce poverty, and combine their marketing with awareness-raising and campaigning.

Alternative trading organizations are often, but not always, based in political and religious groups, though their secular purpose precludes sectarian identification and evangelical activity. Philosophically, the grassroots political-action agenda of these organizations associates them with progressive political causes active since the 1960s: foremost, a belief in collective action and commitment to moral principles based on social, economic and trade justice.

Historically, the largest and most influential ATOs include:

 * 🇦🇹 EZA Fairer Handel
 * 🇧🇪 Oxfam-Magasins Du Monde
 * 🇧🇪 Oxfam-Wereldwinkels
 * 🇨🇦 Equita
 * 🇨🇦 La Siembra Cooperative
 * 🇨🇦 Plan Nagua
 * 🇨🇦 Just Us! Coffee Roasters Co-Op
 * 🇫🇷 Alter Eco
 * 🇫🇷 Éthiquable
 * 🇫🇷 Lobodis
 * 🇫🇷 Solidar'Monde
 * 🇫🇷 Artisans du Monde
 * 🇫🇷🇧🇷 Veja Sneakers
 * 🇩🇪 Gepa The Fair Trade Company
 * 🇩🇪 Ethiquable Deutschland
 * 🇩🇪 El Puente (trade organisation)
 * 🇮🇹 CTM Altromercato
 * 🇳🇱 AgroFair
 * 🇳🇱 Fair Trade Original
 * 🇪🇸 Alternativa3
 * 🇪🇸 Ideas
 * 🇪🇸 Intermon Oxfam
 * 🇨🇭 Claro Fair Trade
 * 🇦🇺 Siem Fair Trade Fashion
 * Cafédirect
 * Equal Exchange Trading
 * Traidcraft
 * Oxfam Trading
 * Twin Trading
 * 🇺🇸 Divine Chocolate
 * 🇺🇸🇨🇦 Cooperative Coffees
 * 🇺🇸 Ten Thousand Villages
 * 🇺🇸 Equal Exchange
 * 🇺🇸 SERRV International

Principles and practices
The defining characteristic of alternative trading organizations is that of equal partnership and respect - partnership between the developing region producers and importers, shops, labelling organizations, and consumers. Alternative trade "humanizes" the trade process - making the producer-consumer chain as short as possible so that consumers become aware of the culture, identity, and conditions in which producers live. All actors are committed to the principle of alternative trade, the need for advocacy in their working relations and the importance of awareness-raising and advocacy work. The idea of the "invisible hand" has given way to the idea of working "hand in hand" with the market regulated by democratic authorities.

Alternative Trading Organizations generally support the following Fair Trade principles and practices in trading relationships:
 * Creating opportunities for economically disadvantaged producers
 * Fair trade is a strategy for poverty alleviation and sustainable development. Its purpose is to create opportunities for producers who have been economically disadvantaged or marginalized by the conventional trading system.

 * Transparency and accountability
 * Fair trade involves transparent management and commercial relations to deal fairly and respectfully with trading partners.

 * Capacity building
 * Fair trade is a means to develop producers' independence. Fairtrade relationships provide continuity, during which producers and their marketing organizations can improve their management skills and their access to new markets.

 * Payment of a fair price
 * A fair price in the regional or local context is one that has been agreed through dialogue and participation. It covers not only the costs of production but enables production which is socially just and environmentally sound. It provides fair pay to the producers and takes into account the principle of equal pay for equal work by women and men. Fairtraders ensure prompt payment to their partners and, whenever possible, help producers with access to pre-harvest or pre-production financing.

 * Gender equity
 * Fair trade means that women's work is properly valued and rewarded. Women are always paid for their contribution to the production process and are empowered in their organizations.

 * Working conditions
 * Fair trade means a safe and healthy working environment for producers. The participation of children (if any) does not adversely affect their well-being, security, educational requirements and need for play and conforms to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as well as the law and norms in the local context.

 * Environment
 * Fair trade actively encourages better environmental practices and the application of responsible methods of production.

title: Alternative trading organization


text:
John 20:11

John 20:11 is the eleventh verse of the twentieth chapter of the Gospel of John in the New Testament of the Christian Bible.

Peter and the Beloved Disciple have just departed, leaving Mary Magdalene at Jesus' tomb.

Content
In the King James Version of the Bible the text reads:
 * But Mary stood without at the
 * sepulchre weeping: and as she
 * wept, she stooped down, and
 * looked into the sepulchre,

The English Standard Version translates the passage as:
 * But Mary stood weeping outside the tomb,
 * and as she wept she stooped to look into the tomb.

For a collection of other versions see BibleHub John 20:11

Analysis
Mary has not been mentioned since John 20:2 and the Gospel does not mention how she made her way back to tomb or if she was present while Peter and the Beloved Disciple were examining it. C.K. Barrett states that it is unknown if Mary was a witness to the examination of the tomb by the two disciples that found the grave clothes still present. The presence of the clothes imply something other than a robbery and if she was aware of them she might not have been weeping.

Why she decides to wait outside the tomb is unknown. According to Leonard, Saint Augustine proposed that "when the men went away, a stronger affection kept the weaker sex firmly in place." John Wesley wonders if Mary had remembered the prophecies that he would arise on the third day. Bruce believes that Mary was hoping someone would pass by who could give her some information.

Why Mary does not seek out Joseph of Arimathea, the owner of the tomb, for information is also a question. Joseph, in fact, is never again mentioned in the Gospel. One theory is that Joseph was so far above Mary's in terms of social class that it would not be right for her to disturb him.

According to Schnackenberg the Codex Sinaiticus has Mary waiting inside the tomb, but this wording does not make much sense with regards to the succeeding verses.

Some scholars feel that Mary's peering into the tomb should follow directly after John 20:1 and see everything in between as an interjection. Brown has argued that John 20 is a synthesis of two sources and that they are only partially integrated. To many it seems illogical for Mary to not have actually looked into the tomb before going and telling Peter and the Beloved Disciple that Jesus' body was gone. This theory also helps explain a number of inconsistencies between John 20:2-10 and the later sections.

One of these inconsistencies is the architecture of the tomb. That Mary stooped to look into the tomb is consistent with what archaeologists know about tombs from this era. Tombs were accessed from doors at ground level which were generally less than a metre tall. These tombs either had a lone chamber for a single individual, or they entrance led to a passage lined with entrances to a number of tombs. Most accounts make it seem that Jesus was in one of the individual type tombs. However John 20:6 mentions that Peter and the Beloved Disciple walked into the tomb, implying a much larger structure that would probably not require stooping. One proposed solution is to argue that there was a large antechamber that could comfortably fit the disciples, and that the actual burial place of Jesus was in a chamber to the side.

Mary's weeping in this verse and subsequent ones is the origin of the word maudlin which is a corruption of the name Magdalene and refers to a person who his sorrowful.

title: John 20:11


text:
User:Prashanthns/olduserpage

 Monday, July 29, 2024  UTC

   Edit Navigation bar

Welcome to my user page on the English Wikipedia. I also edit Medpedia and my user page on medpedia is here. In addition to all this editing, I also have a real life about which you can read here.

Use the navigation bar above to navigate to the links. The userboxes on the right are fairly representative of my knowledge, attitudes and practices; especially the ones that you need to know about me when you deal with me. These are in some sense biases and I have tried to keep them away from affecting my editing.

I use my website to talk much more freely about my biases. Apart from my 'real life' (of which you can read about in the About me section above), I am a part of an eHealth network called PANACeA by IDRC that looks at improving access and utilisation of ICT-enabled services in key sectors like health, education and livelihoods.

Feel free to leave a message to me on my talk page, especially if it has anything to do with my actions. On Wikipedia, my work are in three domains:
 * Content - I create and contribute to articles on natural history & wildlife, history, medicine & public health and on geographical locations that I visit. These include photos, many of which I take for the purpose of illustrating articles on the wiki.
 * Some wikignome jobs mostly on subjects of my interest....and rarely on my favourite tv series and movies, which I start reading and end up editing.
 * Intermittant anti-vandal activities - sometimes, I use Twinkle and rarely Huggle. All allied administrative actions like AfD go along with this. I try to do a bit for the community through my participation in the various elections.
 * I hate Pink Floyd. I think its just a sound and light show.

I am also active on Commons and Wikisource.

My contributions

 * I upload several images, mostly natural history. You can see them on my commons contributions link here
 * Here is an analysis of my edits And here is a list of pages I have created. Thanks to Soxred93's tool
 * And Here is my voting record at RfA thanks to the same tool.
 * Here's my wikichecker analysis

title: User:Prashanthns/olduserpage


text:
Talk:Cole Turner (Charmed)

Untitled
The question at hand is whether or not an article on Cole Turner, a character in the television show “Charmed,” is of encyclopedic material. Art is clearly worthy of inclusion in any encyclopedia. Film as well as New Media Art, including digital video projections of what is essentially a short film, falls under the category of art. The question is really whether or not Television is art, specifically this television show. Like pornography, one can easily differentiate between art and what is clearly not an attempt at the quest for truth. Defining art has always been something of a difficulty. What I would say, in an attempt to prove that “Charmed” is worthy of scholarly attention, although certainly a specific scholar who was researching something titled “Pop Culture and Mythology,” or “Reinterpretations of Fairytales and Lore in Media” would find such an article particularly beneficial, is that “Charmed” makes a worthy attempt at reinterpreting such folktale icons as witches and demons, as well as a good host of mythological creatures, including nymphs, succubae, and banshees, for a modern audience. This encourages the audience to further pursue research on such topics, while thinking about the pycology of these creatures, and questioning the issues of good and evil that humanity encompasses. The medium of television should not limit the scholarly value of the writers, directors, and actors involved with the show. Their artistic vision and understanding of what truly reaches people, specifically the group of people that they feel most strongly need influence, should be valued. The character of Cole Turner deals with conflicts vital to the human experience, specifically light and darkness, as well as the choice between “what is right” and “what will make me feel good right now.” These questions and choices are highly relevant to American culture, most so to the target audience of teenagers and twenty-something’s who are in the process of examining morality and their own understanding of themselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.171.22.116 (talk) 04:51, 7 February 2005 (UTC)

Time Traveler
Just noticed the note about how Cole never time travelled. Technically I believe he did... he went back to try to kill/kidnap Melinda Warren as a baby, in the episode All Halliwell's Eve. I'm not sure that one jump (that we was probably sent by somebody else, since I don't think he can under his own power) technically makes him a Time Traveler for purpose of the category, but just wanted to correct that. --Maelwys 12:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I think those two Grimlocks in All Halliwell's Eve sent Cole back,because they open up the time portal for the Charmed Ones.Then, you see that Cole was in that time with the Charmed Ones too.Very confusing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JakeTheBlake (talk • contribs) 22:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

And very wrong. The Grimlocks don't open the portal for the sisters, they don't have nearly enough power to do so. The Elders sent them back and the Triad sent Cole back. Thus Cole is not technically a time traveller as it was not under his own power. And yes I am well aware these comments were made ages ago, I just thought I'd mention now for future references. Tavy08 (talk) 03:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Spoiler tag?
Is it really necessary to have a spoiler tag in this article? The series is over with (except in countries that are behind the US), and so it seems that at least in the english 'pedia, such a tag is no longer necessary. Or am I misunderstanding it's usage? ··· Q  Huntster  (T) • @ • (C)  22:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

In reference to "cole staying dead" after the avatar episode, he did come back in the 7 year witch. As far as the grimlocks openeing a portal, this is incorrecet. The elders opened the portal to send the charmed ones back to save their line. Cole traveled on his own, with the help of magic he took out of a pouch. You see this when he returns home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.163.133 (talk) 02:51, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Not confusing at all and the Grimelocks didnt open the portal for the charmed ones the elders did so they could save Melinda as a baby so they didnt all turn evil..And Cole had maic it fuckin shows you at the end of that episode —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.198.139 (talk) 06:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

No Spoiler tag is needed. The article is clearly enough divided into sections so that the reader can skip past the plot section to avoid spoilers if they so wish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.89.155.111 (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Powers List
Did Cole actually ever become an Avatar? Because i thought he only nearly did. I cant remember him ever actually having or using Avatar powers. July10 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.194.87.1 (talk) 11:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes he did become an avatar and then rewrote reality to his unfortunate end, he was vanquished in the same episode (that time he stayed dead). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.170.93.59 (talk) 01:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering how Cole shows his ability to control time before join avator? Is it power to freeze objects much like Piper did or Time control? it's 2 different powers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.64.218.57 (talk) 13:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Revision as of 20:34, 1 July 2008, restored to record in this work paper 9 July 2009:

(1) [Cut to the living room. Cole, Kurzon and Little Phoebe are there. Little Phoebe is screaming and then faints on the couch. Kurzon throws an energy ball at Little Phoebe.]

Cole: No! (Cole blocks little Phoebe's body and the energy ball hits him. Kurzon looks surprised.) Leave the girl alone!

Kurzon: Belthazor? I thought you were dead.

Cole: He is! (A dagger materialises in Cole's hand and he throws it at Kurzon. Kurzon pulls it out of his body.)

Kurzon: It'll take more than that to stop me.

Cole: Very well. (Cole creates and throws a demonic fireball at Kurzon, knocking him down. Kurzon gets back up.)

Kurzon: The Source!

[Piper, Phoebe, Paige and Leo run down the stairs. Kurzon shimmers out...]

(2) Piper's spirit: What are you exactly? Ghost, demon, poltergeist, nightmare?

Cole: None of the above. We're caught in a cosmic void…between Life and Death.

Piper's spirit: I’m stuck with you?"

Cole: No. If you play your cards right, you can get out of this nasty limbo. I’m the one who’s here for all eternity...

and:

Cole: I’m cursed to live in eternity, without love, for what I’ve done, and I accept that. But I don't want Phoebe to be cursed, too. She needs love. She deserves it. But she's not going to keep looking for it unless you give her a reason to. Now, you and Leo are that reason... - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtq (talk • contribs) 20:34, 1 July 2008, section/answer restored with blockquoted recovery (Fra nkB 14:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC))

Belthazor should be merged here.
It is the same character, and I can't see how it has enough information to have page of its own. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 23:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Reply to above suggestion: Belthazor and Cole should not be merged into one article, they were two different characters. Belthazor was a Demon, pure and simple. Cole was much more than that. He had a soul, he had the ability to love to a great extent, and he was not destroyed when Belthazor was vanquished. They were two separate entities trapped in the same body. And the biggest point behind my arguement- Belthazor was a demon and hence inherently evil- cole was a great man with a strong heart. 27 June 2008- Troy Rison —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.117.238 (talk) 05:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * section begun originally May 2008 restored 9 Jan 2009: reconstruction of this improper deletion:
 * (Revision diff as of 05:03, 27 June 2008) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabartus (talk • contribs) 14:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

The Seer and "into the void".
I have one question about the sentence When the Seer says the Source's power went "into the void", she was referring to the "void" where Cole's demon half used to be. Either in that episode or a previous episode (been watching the series again and see if I can dig up which it is), she mentions as a Seer she cannot lie. However, that doesn't stop her from bending the truth. Though I like the take on "Cole's Void", the way she phrased the response was more in the form of a question. I think this is her way of not answering the question out right that it went into Cole, but make it sound like it was gone, making the sisters think they had won. StarDal (talk) 14:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I believe that the episode in which the "first" Source is killed is also her introduction as well - Charmed and Dangerous (4x13). It would be that episode that she says she can't lie. Will confirm. StarDal (talk) 14:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree, it does sound like she is being evasive. Into the void was just her way of not telling Cole he had the powers, as she did mean the void were his demonic half used to be. Phrasing it like a question may have been her way of getting past her "cannot lie" characteristic. I also agree with your second statement as well, this is the first time she really becomes a recurring character for the series. Tavy08 (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Merge proposal Cole Turner with Belthazor

 * refactored from below, after restoring links as noted above.:ALSO: redated Merge tags to 9 July 2009 for the sake of proper process.
 * Just seen these... date unknown, improperly hung, since no link to this or any section introducing the topic and the tags (Lazy paperhangers! YUCK!!!) have no embedded rationale or reasoned arguments for the proposal. Tags removed on that basis. If you hung them, try reading the help before using merger tags again. // Fra nkB 14:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Continued New discussion on the merger

 * Neutral leaning keep--at least until I have time to peruse both articles better, but my gut feel is to leave well enough alone as the demon's interactions (TRIAD, SOURCE, DEMONIC WORLD in general) is outside the behaviours conducted by Cole Turner (Assistant District Attorney, Phoebe's love interest, intercessor with police authorities) so that treatment as two characters is warranted on the grounds of easiest exposition of the character(z).    - Moreover, truncation by merger just creates an uninformative redirect and would create double redirects in various links and templates.     - Lastly, a couple of short articles are superior and far easier to edit and maintain than one large confusing one trying to cover too many aspects. While the two will necessarily have cross-references mentions to some matters in the other, that should aid ease of writing and help keep the writing from being "In-universe" in style, as is criticized by such a tag on one of these currently. // Fra nkB  15:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 12:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 9 October 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Cole Turner → Cole Turner (Charmed) – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 15:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nomination and also support creation of a Cole Turner disambiguation page that would list Cole Turner (soccer), Cole Turner (American football) as well as Cole Turner (Charmed). —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per nom and Roman Spinner. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Shwcz (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cole Turner (Charmed)


text:
User talk:Tcamp67

Victoria gotti plase e-mail me at tcamp453@earthlink.net

title: User talk:Tcamp67


text:
Jacobi triple product

In mathematics, the Jacobi triple product is the identity:

 * $$\prod_{m=1}^\infty

\left( 1 - x^{2m}\right) \left( 1 + x^{2m-1} y^2\right) \left( 1 +\frac{x^{2m-1}}{y^2}\right) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x^{n^2} y^{2n}, $$ for complex numbers x and y, with |x| < 1 and y ≠ 0. It was introduced by in his work Fundamenta Nova Theoriae Functionum Ellipticarum.

The Jacobi triple product identity is the Macdonald identity for the affine root system of type A1, and is the Weyl denominator formula for the corresponding affine Kac–Moody algebra.

Properties
Jacobi's proof relies on Euler's pentagonal number theorem, which is itself a specific case of the Jacobi triple product identity.

Let $$x=q\sqrt q$$ and $$y^2=-\sqrt{q}$$. Then we have
 * $$\phi(q) = \prod_{m=1}^\infty \left(1-q^m \right) =

\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (-1)^n q^{\frac{3n^2-n}{2}}.$$

The Rogers–Ramanujan identities follow with $$x=q^2\sqrt q$$, $$y^2=-\sqrt{q}$$ and $$x=q^2\sqrt q$$, $$y^2=-q\sqrt{q}$$.

The Jacobi Triple Product also allows the Jacobi theta function to be written as an infinite product as follows:

Let $$x=e^{i\pi \tau}$$ and $$y=e^{i\pi z}.$$

Then the Jacobi theta function

\vartheta(z; \tau) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty e^{\pi {\rm{i}} n^2 \tau + 2 \pi {\rm{i}} n z} $$

can be written in the form

 * $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty y^{2n}x^{n^2}. $$

Using the Jacobi triple product identity, the theta function can be written as the product

 * $$\vartheta(z; \tau) = \prod_{m=1}^\infty

\left( 1 - e^{2m \pi {\rm{i}} \tau}\right) \left[ 1 + e^{(2m-1) \pi {\rm{i}} \tau + 2 \pi {\rm{i}} z}\right] \left[ 1 + e^{(2m-1) \pi {\rm{i}} \tau -2 \pi {\rm{i}} z}\right]. $$

There are many different notations used to express the Jacobi triple product. It takes on a concise form when expressed in terms of q-Pochhammer symbols:

 * $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty q^{\frac{n(n+1)}{2}}z^n =

(q;q)_\infty \; \left(-\tfrac{1}{z};q\right)_\infty \; (-zq;q)_\infty,$$ where $$(a;q)_\infty$$ is the infinite q-Pochhammer symbol.

It enjoys a particularly elegant form when expressed in terms of the Ramanujan theta function. For $$|ab|<1$$ it can be written as

 * $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a^{\frac{n(n+1)}{2}} \; b^{\frac{n(n-1)}{2}} = (-a; ab)_\infty \;(-b; ab)_\infty \;(ab;ab)_\infty.$$

Proof
Let $$f_x(y) = \prod_{m=1}^\infty \left( 1 - x^{2m} \right)\left( 1 + x^{2m-1} y^2\right)\left( 1 +x^{2m-1}y^{-2}\right)$$

Substituting $xy$ for $y$ and multiplying the new terms out gives

 * $$f_x(xy) = \frac{1+x^{-1}y^{-2}}{1+xy^2}f_x(y) = x^{-1}y^{-2}f_x(y)$$

Since $$f_x$$ is meromorphic for $$|y| > 0$$, it has a Laurent series

 * $$f_x(y)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty c_n(x)y^{2n}$$

which satisfies

 * $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty c_n(x)x^{2n+1} y^{2n}=x f_x(x y)=y^{-2}f_x(y)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty c_{n+1}(x)y^{2n}$$

so that

 * $$c_{n+1}(x) = c_n(x)x^{2n+1} = \dots = c_0(x) x^{(n+1)^2}$$

and hence

 * $$f_x(y)=c_0(x) \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x^{n^2} y^{2n}$$

Evaluating $c_{0}(x)$
Showing that $$c_0(x) = 1$$ (the polynomial of x of $$y^0$$ is 1) is technical. One way is to set $$y= 1$$ and show both the numerator and the denominator of
 * $$\frac1{c_0(e^{2i\pi z})} =\frac{\sum\limits_{n=-\infty}^\infty e^{2i\pi n^2 z}}{\prod\limits_{m=1}^\infty (1-e^{2i\pi mz})(1+e^{2i\pi(2m-1)z})^2}$$

are weight 1/2 modular under $$z\mapsto -\frac{1}{4z}$$, since they are also 1-periodic and bounded on the upper half plane the quotient has to be constant so that $$c_0(x)=c_0(0)=1$$.

Other proofs
A different proof is given by G. E. Andrews based on two identities of Euler.

For the analytic case, see Apostol.

title: Jacobi triple product


text:
Kevin Zegers

Kevin Zegers (born September 19, 1984) is a Canadian actor. He is known for his roles as Josh Framm in the Air Bud film series, Toby Osbourne in Transamerica (2005), Damien Dalgaard in the CW teen drama Gossip Girl, and as rookie FBI Agent Brendon Acres on the ABC crime drama The Rookie: Feds. He has also starred in the films Dawn of the Dead (2004), It's a Boy Girl Thing (2006), The Jane Austen Book Club (2007), Fifty Dead Men Walking (2008), Frozen (2010), The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones, and Nighthawks (2019).

Early life
Zegers was born in Woodstock, Ontario, the son of Mary-Ellen (née Veldman), a teacher, and Jim Zegers, a quarry worker. He has two sisters, Krista and Katie. (The latter is also an actress; she appeared with him in John Carpenter's In the Mouth of Madness.) He is of Dutch descent; all four of his grandparents were born in the Netherlands. He attended St Mary's Catholic High School in Woodstock.

Zegers is active in sports, especially basketball, ice hockey, and golf. He played on the Hollywood Knights celebrity basketball team, raising money for local Los Angeles schools.

Early work
Zegers began his performing career at the age of six, appearing in about 30 TV commercials. His first film role was at the age of seven, in a small part in the Michael J. Fox comedy Life with Mikey (1993), playing a younger version of Fox's character. Subsequently, he made a guest appearance on the acclaimed science fiction series The X-Files, playing a stigmatic child, Kevin Kryder, in the 1995 episode "Revelations," and had a recurring role on the Canadian TV series Traders (1996). During this time, he appeared in several made-for-television films, including Thicker Than Blood: The Larry McLinden Story, The Silence of Adultery, and Rose Hill, and as Noah Thompson in the "Let's Get Invisible!" episode of Goosebumps.

His career received a major boost when he won the role of Josh Framm in Air Bud (1997), a film about a lonely boy who befriends a basketball-playing dog. Air Bud launched a franchise, with four sequels. Zegers appeared in four of the films, as well as a similar title, MVP: Most Valuable Primate (2000), which featured a hockey-playing chimp.

Around that time, he starred in other family-friendly fare, including A Call To Remember (1997) with Joe Mantegna, Nico the Unicorn (1998) with Elisha Cuthbert, Treasure Island (1999) with Jack Palance, and Time Share (2000) with Nastassja Kinski. He also played a boy who discovers he is a clone in the TV series So Weird (1999). While also headlining numerous family/animal films, between 1997 and 2004, Zegers had starring or costarring roles in many low-budget horror films, often Canadian, including Shadow Builder, Komodo (1999), Wrong Turn (2003), and Fear of the Dark and The Hollow (both 2004).

In Four Days (1999), Zegers played a nameless boy devoted to his bank-robber father. He also appeared in the short-lived American television series Titans (2000), opposite Yasmine Bleeth, for which he was chosen by producer Aaron Spelling. It was his first regular television series role. Zegers had previously worked with Bleeth in the 1999 film It Came from the Sky, where he played a mentally disabled child visited by an angel-like couple. He co-starred with Harry Hamlin in Sex, Lies & Obsession (2001), a Lifetime Network film about sex addiction, and with Gena Rowlands and James Caan in The Incredible Mrs. Ritchie (2003), a television film drama that won three Daytime Emmy awards: Outstanding Children/Youth/Family Special, Outstanding Performer (Rowlands), and Outstanding Writing.

In the summer of 2003, he filmed the drama Some Things That Stay at the same time as the remake of Dawn of the Dead, shuttling across Canada between sets. Around this time, he also continued his television work, appearing on Smallville in 2003 and House in 2004.

2005–present
In 2005, he had a major role in the Academy Award-nominated independent film Transamerica, co-starring Felicity Huffman. Zegers' performance as Toby Osbourne, the street-hustling bisexual son of a trans woman (Huffman) was praised by several critics, and he won the Trophée Chopard for Male Revelation at the 2006 Cannes Film Festival. Director Duncan Tucker said he had to overcome his initial wariness over Zegers' good looks before casting him for the role. Varietys reviewer wrote that "Zegers... finds multiple dimensions in pic's potentially most clichéd character...," and The Hollywood Reporters critic said, "As a boy who considers sex his chief talent, Zegers... conveys Toby's essential sweetness and hunger for real affection, making him much more than just a vain or damaged kid."

Also in 2005, he appeared with Shailene Woodley in Felicity: An American Girl Adventure, a television film set in Williamsburg, Virginia, in 1775, based on the American Girl book series. He played 15-year-old Benjamin "Ben" Davidson, an apprentice at a shop owned by Felicity's father. In 2006, Zegers played supervillain Concussion in the comedy Zoom, with Tim Allen, and had the lead role opposite Samaire Armstrong in the romantic comedy It's a Boy Girl Thing. He guest-starred as Damien Dalgaard in Gossip Girl from 2009 until 2010, and returned again in late 2010 for multiple episodes throughout season 4. He appeared in Rock Mafia's 2010 music video "The Big Bang", and in 2012, played the male protagonist in the television series Titanic: Blood and Steel.

Zegers portrayed Alec Lightwood in The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones (2013). He joined the cast of Fear the Walking Dead for the series' fourth season.

Personal life
In August 2013, Zegers married Jaime Feld, a talent agent. The couple had twin girls in August 2015.

title: Kevin Zegers


text:
Messerschmitt Me 209 (1943)

The Me 209 of 1943 was an attempt to create an enhanced version of the Bf 109, which served as the Luftwaffe's primary fighter aircraft throughout World War II. The Me 209, despite its designation, bore no relationship to the earlier Me 209.

The RLM's 8-209 airframe number assigned to Messerschmitt, for its pair of post-July 1938 designation Me 209 airframes, was used for two projects during the late 1930s and early 1940s. The first Me 209 was a single-engine air speed record plane for which little consideration was given to adaptation for combat.

Design and development
The second use of the Me 209 designation was for a proposal, in 1943, to make a heavily modified version of the Bf 109. This Me 209 would compete against Focke-Wulf's high performance Fw 190 D-9 and Ta 152 fighters. Like these enhanced versions of Kurt Tank's design, the new Me 209 would share most of its airframe with a proven model, in this case the Bf 109G.

Unfortunately for the design team, the Me 209's proposed DB 603A engine was in short supply and they were forced to use the Junkers Motorenwerke firm's Jumo 213A engine. Even though the 35 litre engine displacement Jumo 213 had been deliberately designed to have as many of its engine access points as possible made to be identical with the 44.52 litre displacement DB 603 powerplant (Germany's largest-displacement inverted V12 aircraft engine), this changeover required some reconstruction of the engine cowling and cooling system. The most visible change was the required one to the engine's air intake location, as the Jumo 213's supercharger intake was located on the starboard side of the engine (as standard for all models of the earlier Junkers Jumo 211 inverted V12), versus the DB 603's portside location, the standard for all Daimler-Benz inverted V12 engine designs. The Me 209 featured a new tail section, wings, wide-track landing gear, a taller tail and an annular radiator for the inline engine, which gave the engine a superficial resemblance to a radial engine and to the very similar installation on the Focke-Wulf Fw 190D, which used the same Jumo 213 powerplant. The extent of the modifications undermined the original purpose, which was to build a superior aircraft as similar to the existing Bf 109G as possible.

The Me 209 V5 featured armament of one Motorkanone engine-mounted 30 mm (1.18 in) MK 108 cannon plus two 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine guns in the wing roots. The V6 was the first version to be converted to use the Jumo 213 engine and had 20 mm MG 151/20 cannon instead of the MG 131s. The Me 209H V1 was a high-altitude variant with extended wings and DB 603 engine.

Testing
The program met a swift end when the Me 209 V5 prototype first flew in late 1943. It was 50 km/h (31 mph) slower than the Fw 190D and offered no improvement in handling characteristics. After its disappointing show, the Me 209 project was cancelled.

title: Messerschmitt Me 209 (1943)


text:
Cerna, Croatia

Cerna (Asorn) is a village and a municipality in eastern Croatia.

Geography
It is located half-way between the cities of Vinkovci and Županja. It is located on four rivers, Biđ, Bosut, Berava, Bitulja, Krajc channel and Kaluđer channel.

Population
According to 2021 Croatian census it has 3,722 inhabitants in 2 settlements:
 * Cerna - 3,027
 * Šiškovci - 695

98.96% of the citizens are Croats.

History
One Scordisci archaeological site in Cerna dating back to late La Tène culture was excavated in the 1970s and 1980s as a part of rescue excavations in eastern Croatia. Archaeological site was a part of the settlement network of Scordisci in the area of Vinkovci.

title: Cerna, Croatia


text: User talk:67.177.218.175

title: User talk:67.177.218.175


text:
User talk:JohnRTroy

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

 * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try How to edit a page.
 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use 	 ~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes).
 * You can experiment in the test area.
 * You can get help at the Help Desk
 * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines, Neutral point of view, Civility, What Wikipedia is not
 * If you made IP edits before creating a user account, you can attribute your IP edits to your account at Changing attribution for an edit.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop a note at New user log.

-- Utcursch | Talk to me

User notes
Hi, just wanted to let you know, if you want to thank another user, or comment, its better to do so on their user talk page. In the case of User:N. Caligon and the note you left on Talk:John Byrne, its a better practice to leave these on the users talk page, User talk:N. Caligon. This is mainly only for registered users, as IP's will change for other people. In this way, you can have an off article topic discussion directly with the user, and it will notify them of messages next time they are on. Thanks for you understanding. <> Who ? ¿ ? 08:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

John -- just saw your message on your website -- contact me -- slayers750@yahoo.com -- I am the user tbo452 on myspace!!

Filmography/actor navboxes
I noticed you had added an Eddie Murphy navbox to his page that contained his full filmography along with a list of albums. To save you a lot of work, please note that we do not use actor and filmography navboxes. See WT:ACTOR for a compilation of the large number of links to deletion discussions that resulted in the deletion of such boxes. I removed the films from the navbox but left the albums, which are accepted on articles. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Gioia bruno promotion pic 2007 001.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gioia bruno promotion pic 2007 001.jpg, which you've sourced to Karina DelBel.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 16:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Ankheg
Hello,

Because you participated in the previous AFD for Ankheg, I am notifying you that it has been nominated for AFD again. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Lamia (D&D)
Hello, as you took part in the 1st AFD for Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons), which closed on "no consensus", I'm bringing to your attention that after a second AFD with the same result, a discussion on whether to merge or not has opened on the article talk page. BOZ (talk) 11:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Al Plastino
No reason? Read the talk page where you misrepresent the CDC. You cannot seriously be suggesting that flu vaccines cause GBS. If that were the case, no one would get flu vaccines. Do you think vaccines cause autism, too? Read the talk page rather than edit-war.

You and other family/friends are tag-teaming and I won't violate WP:3RR. But I can see we need to take this to ANI. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

 * Placing a response since it's on my talk page, just because this is my zone. For the record, it's unfortunate you felt the need to escalate things to admin twice in a 48 hour period.  The fact of the matter is, I did not know enough about GBS and was actually trying to research it.  There does seem to be some concern about the GBS virus at least affecting one prior vaccine.  There are side-effects, even if they are rare, to vaccines, such as Encephalitis and allegic reactions.  ( http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110525/full/473436a.html )  I am certainly not one of those people who are anti-vaccination.  But we have no idea if they were saying he had a pre-existing condition and the virus triggered it, and I was giving the source the benefit of the doubt.  I strongly suggest you learn not to over-react to criticism.  JRT (talk) 19:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

 * It's not a matter of reacting to criticism. I'm a professional journalist and I know both the basic standards of trustworthy, responsible journalism and the even higher standards that an encyclopedia must uphold. And to see untrained people violate so many standards of both areas and then refuse to understand they're being irresponsible is frustrating. If you wouldn't perform surgery or try a case in court without training, why would anyone think, once they get into contentious areas of scholarship, that they have the training and tools to perform journalism or encyclopedia-level research? Anyone can edit Wikipedia, and that means having to rise to professional standards, not lowering the bar. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * On that level, I can understand. JRT (talk) 20:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

 * Look, I'm sorry for getting frustrated. Please feel free, not that permission is needed, but please feel free to delete this talk-page section and let's try to put this behind us.

 * The ANI-page sections will get archived soon enough, if they haven't been already, and so will Al Plastino talk page. Maybe this difficult episode will fade away. I sincerely wish you pleasant and constructive Wiki'ing. With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Al Plastino. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --  At am a  頭 21:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive831 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Help
Hi John. I noticed that you seem to have run into a few arguments recently regarding properly citing content to credible sources before adding it to Wikipedia. Also, that you have made ~1,000 edits, but nobody has really welcomed you to Wikipedia or offered to help. Meanwhile an acronym soup of policies and guidelines are being dumped on you.

So I thought I would offer myself up as a potential contact if you need help in the future, have questions, etc. I noticed that you felt the Mass Effect 3 Controversy section was overblown and I agree. Such things often occur from disgruntled fans. For example a whole paragraph is devoted to a medicore source regarding a forum post (or something like that) and it has some speculation, which about why certain people retired and we prefer to avoid speculations in most cases.

Anyways, I just wanted to let you know there is someone around that can help. CorporateM (Talk) 22:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

 * I have one question for you CorporateM. Could you evaluate what I wrote today in the Al Plastino Talk Page.  I'm not asking you to weigh in on that conversation, I'm simply want to make sure I'm obeying the etiquette standards of Wikipedia as expected in the talk page.  I was going to stay out of it but I had a final concern based on the comment and I want to make sure I'm making my arguments well or at least politely.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:JohnRTroy


text:
User talk:Romanserf

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

 * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try How to edit a page.
 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use 	 ~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes).
 * You can experiment in the test area.
 * You can get help at the Help Desk
 * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines, Neutral point of view, Civility, What Wikipedia is not
 * If you made IP edits before creating a user account, you can attribute your IP edits to your account at Changing attribution for an edit.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop a note at New user log.

-- Utcursch | Talk to me

Uploading images.
When you upload images it is very important to do two things
 * 1) State the source
 * 2) State the copyright status

To do this you must edit the image page.

To state the copyright status you should use one of the tags, or  to indicate Public Domain (either very old - pre 1923, released by the creator or not eligable for copyright), GNU free documentation licence - for your own work, or Fair use. Be careful with the last one - the rules for fair use are subtle, and you must make a legal case for each individual image.

Note that the wiki commons does not accept fair use images. In particular, are the pictures of the German planes public domain?

Without evidence that images are free, they will ultimately be deleted!

— Zeimusu | Talk 01:26, 2005 Feb 8 (UTC)

Hi Romanserf - you're making some great aircraft contributions here. Please check out WikiProject Aircraft, the attempt to co-ordinate our aircraft content on the 'pedia. In particular, please note that the footers and the blue data tables you've been using belong to an old standard - for the last six months or so, we switched to a text-based specification (you can find it here). We're slowly converting old examples over, but it's dull and thankless work, so is probably proceding more slowly than it should. Anyway, welcome aboard! --Rlandmann 02:10, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of :Image:Me-209II.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Me-209II.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - AWeenieMan (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of :Image:Me-209-1.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Me-209-1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - AWeenieMan (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Jane C. Sherburne.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jane C. Sherburne.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Jane C. Sherburne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ✉→ Arctic Kangaroo ←✎ 05:13, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

title: User talk:Romanserf


text:
Northern Scotland

Northern Scotland was an administrative division of Scotland used for police and fire services. It consisted of Highland, the Orkney Islands, the Shetland Islands, and the Western Isles. The police service (Northern Constabulary) used Northern in its name, but the fire service used the name Highlands and Islands Fire and Rescue Service. In 2013, the services were merged into Police Scotland and the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, respectively.

title: Northern Scotland


text:
Atlanta Nights

Atlanta Nights is a collaborative novel created in 2004 by a group of science fiction and fantasy authors, with the express purpose of producing an unpublishably bad piece of work, so as to test whether publishing firm PublishAmerica would still accept it. It was accepted; after the hoax was revealed, the publisher withdrew its offer.

The primary purpose of the exercise was to test PublishAmerica's claims to be a "traditional publisher" that would only accept high-quality manuscripts. Critics had long claimed that PublishAmerica is actually a vanity press that paid no special attention to the sales potential of the books they published, since most of their revenue came from the authors rather than book buyers. PublishAmerica had previously made some derogatory public remarks about science fiction and fantasy writers, because many of their critics came from those communities; those derogatory remarks influenced the decision to make such a public test of PublishAmerica's claims.

Background
PublishAmerica described itself as a "traditional publisher" and claimed to accept only high-quality manuscripts for publication. Its website further stated that the company received over 70 manuscripts a day and rejected most of them.

At one point, PublishAmerica posted articles on their AuthorsMarket website stating that, among other things:

Preparation
In retaliation, a group of science fiction and fantasy authors under the direction of James D. Macdonald collaborated on a deliberately low-quality work, complete with obvious grammatical errors, nonsensical passages, and a complete lack of a coherent plot. The effort was partly inspired by another collaborative "hoax" work, Naked Came the Stranger, as the working title of Atlanta Nights was Naked Came the Badfic.

The distinctive flaws of Atlanta Nights include nonidentical chapters written by two different authors from the same segment of outline (13 and 15), a missing chapter (21), two chapters that are word-for-word identical (4 and 17), two different chapters with the same chapter number (12 and 12), and a chapter "written" by a computer program that generated random text based on patterns found in the previous chapters (34). Characters change gender and race; they die and reappear without explanation. Spelling and grammar are nonstandard and the formatting is inconsistent. The initials of characters who were named in the book spelled out the phrase "PublishAmerica is a vanity press."

Under Macdonald's direction, the denouement, which takes place in the middle of the book, revealed that all the previous events of the plot had been a dream, although the book continues for several more chapters.

Submission
The completed manuscript was offered to PublishAmerica by an unrevealed person not usually associated with fiction. The manuscript was accepted for publication on December 7, 2004. The hoaxers reviewed the contract with legal counsel, and made the decision not to carry the hoax through to actually publishing the book.

On January 23, 2005, the authors publicly revealed the hoax, and PublishAmerica retracted its acceptance the following day, stating that after "further review" the novel failed to meet their standards.

Publication
The authors subsequently published the book through print on demand publisher Lulu under the pseudonym "Travis Tea" with all profits going to the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America Emergency Medical Fund. Teresa Nielsen Hayden's review said, "The world is full of bad books written by amateurs. But why settle for the merely regrettable? Atlanta Nights is a bad book written by experts."

Authors
The authors of the chapters of this book include:

• Chapter 1 – Sherwood Smith

• Chapter 2 – James D. Macdonald

• Chapter 3 – Sheila Finch

• Chapter 4 – Charles Coleman Finlay

• Chapter 5 – Julia West

• Chapter 6 – Brook West

• Chapter 7 – Adam-Troy Castro

• Chapter 8 – Allen Steele

• Chapter 9 – Alan Rodgers

• Chapter 10 – Mary Catelli

• Chapter 11 – Andrew Burt

• Chapter 12 – Victoria Strauss

• Chapter 12 – Shira Daemon (There are two "Chapter 12"s)

• Chapter 13 – Vera Nazarian

• Chapter 14 – Sean P. Fodera

• Chapter 15 – Teresa Nielsen Hayden

• Chapter 16 – Ken Houghton

• Chapter 17 – Charles Coleman Finlay (Identical to Chapter 4)

• Chapter 18 – M. Turville Heitz

• Chapter 19 – Kevin O'Donnell, Jr

• Chapter 20 – Chuck Rothman

• Chapter 22 – Laura J. Underwood (Chapter 21 was "missing")

• Chapter 23 – Jena Snyder

• Chapter 24 – Paul Melko

• Chapter 25 – Tina Kuzminski

• Chapter 26 – Ted Kuzminski

• Chapter 27 – Megan Lindholm/Robin Hobb

• Chapter 28 – Danica and Brook West

• Chapter 29 – Rowan and Julia West

• Chapter 30 – Derryl Murphy

• Chapter 31 – Michael Armstrong

• Chapter 32 – Pierce Askegren

• Chapter 33 – Deanna Hoak

• Chapter 34 – Computer-generated by the software Bonsai Story Generator

• Chapter 35 – Catherine Mintz

• Chapter 36 – Peter Heck

• Chapter 37 – M. Turville Heitz

• Chapter 38 –

• Chapter 39 – Brenda Clough

• Chapter 40 – Judi B. Castro

• Chapter 41 – Terry McGarry

Film
The book and the story behind it were optioned for a film in February 2011 by producing team Roy C. Booth and Rachael Saltzman, who were also slated to co-write and co-direct the film. The options money has gone to the SFWA Emergency Medical Fund. Production was tentatively scheduled to begin August 2011, but on May 16, 2011 the crowd funding campaign ended without reaching its goal.

title: Atlanta Nights