text:
Army of the Ohio

The Army of the Ohio was the name of two Union armies in the American Civil War. The first army became the Army of the Cumberland and the second army was created in 1863.

1st Army of the Ohio
General Orders No. 97 appointed Maj. Gen. Don Carlos Buell to command the Department of the Ohio. All the forces of the department were then organized into the Army of the Ohio, with Buell in command. Early in 1862, the army fought its first battle at Mill Springs, although only the 1st Division, commanded by Brig. Gen. George H. Thomas, was engaged. The whole army marched to reinforce Grant's Army of the Tennessee at the Battle of Shiloh.

Buell was replaced as commander of the Department of the Ohio by Brig. Gen. Horatio G. Wright in August 1862, but because of Wright's junior rank, Maj. Gen. Henry W. Halleck ordered Thomas to replace Wright in command. However, Thomas foresaw a major battle and felt it unwise to change an army commander on the eve of battle. Thus Buell remained in command of the Army and Thomas was made his second-in-command.

The battle Thomas foresaw occurred on October 8, 1862, west of Perryville, Kentucky. Confederate General Braxton Bragg had marched into Kentucky to recruit soldiers and take the state from the Union. The full force of Buell's command was gathering when Bragg attacked. Known as the Battle of Perryville, or the Battle of Chaplin Hills, casualties were very high on both sides.

Union casualties totaled 4,276 (894 killed, 2,911 wounded, 471 captured or missing). Confederate casualties were 3,401 (532 killed, 2,641 wounded, 228 captured or missing). [1] Although Union losses were higher, Bragg withdrew from Kentucky when the fighting was over, and therefore Perryville is considered a strategic victory for the Union.

Buell was subsequently relieved of all field command. Maj. Gen. William S. Rosecrans was appointed to command the Army of Ohio. He was also appointed to the command of the Department of the Cumberland and subsequently renamed his forces the Army of the Cumberland.

2nd Army of the Ohio
On 25 March 1863, Maj. Gen. Ambrose Burnside assumed command of the Department of the Ohio headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. On March 19, 1863, two divisions of the IX Corps under Maj. Gen. John G. Parke had been ordered from Virginia to Burnside's department. On April 27, 1863, the War Department ordered all troops in Kentucky not belonging to IX Corps to be organized into the XXIII Corps under the commanded of Maj. Gen. George L. Hartsuff. By May 1863 Burnside had consolidated the forces of Kentucky into the IX Corps and XXIII Corps which he styled the Army of the Ohio. Thus, Burnside became one of the few officers to directly command two completely different armies (he had earlier commanded the Army of the Potomac). The IX Corps was soon transferred to Mississippi in June to participate in the siege of Vicksburg but was returned to the Army of the Ohio in August.

Meanwhile, the new Army of the Ohio' XXIII Corps repelled Morgan's Ohio raid, although the entire army rarely functioned as one complete unit during this campaign. Reunited with the IX Corps and the addition of a cavalry division, Burnside moved to Knoxville, Tennessee. There he defeated the Confederates at the Battle of Fort Sanders in the Knoxville Campaign. After the battle, he asked to be relieved of command due to illness. Maj. Gen. John G. Foster replaced Burnside as commander of the Army and Department of the Ohio on December 9.

Foster's time in command of the Army was short. On February 9, 1864, Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield assumed command of the Department of the Ohio, and then the Army of the Ohio and the XXIII Corps in April. During this time the XXIII Corps and the Army of the Ohio were synonymous. Schofield led the Army during the Atlanta Campaign and pursued Confederate Lt. Gen. John Bell Hood into Tennessee after the fall of Atlanta. At the Battle of Franklin, Schofield inflicted a severe defeat on Hood's army before joining with Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas and the Army of the Cumberland for the Battle of Nashville. On February 9, 1865, Schofield was transferred to command the Department of North Carolina. When Schofield departed to assume departmental command, Maj. Gen. Jacob D. Cox temporarily assumed command of the Army.

The XXIII Corps was ordered to North Carolina and only Cox's division was present for the Battle of Wilmington. It was not until March 1865 that the rest of the XXIII Corps landed at New Bern, North Carolina. Upon the arrival of the XXIII Corps in its entirety, Schofield joined that corps with the X Corps under Maj. Gen. Alfred H. Terry to form the Army of the Ohio. The Army was designated the Center Wing of Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman's army and participated in the final stages of the Carolinas Campaign. With the close of the war, the troops were mustered out of military service. A number of post-war reunions were held by various elements of the old Army of the Ohio.

Commanders

 * Maj. Gen. Don Carlos Buell (November 15, 1861 – October 24, 1862) also department commander until March 11
 * Maj. Gen. William S. Rosecrans (October 24–30, 1862) became the Army of the Cumberland
 * Maj. Gen. Ambrose Burnside (March 25 – December 9, 1863) also department commander
 * Maj. Gen. John G. Foster (December 9, 1863 – February 9, 1864) also department commander
 * Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield (February 9 – September 14, 1864) also department commander
 * Maj. Gen. Jacob D. Cox (September 14 – October 22, 1864)
 * Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield (October 22, 1864 – February 2, 1865)
 * Maj. Gen. Jacob D. Cox (February 2–9, 1865)
 * Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield (February 9 – March 31, 1865) also commander of the Department of North Carolina

Major battles and campaigns

 * Battle of Shiloh (Buell)
 * Battle of Perryville (Buell)
 * Morgan's Raid (Burnside)
 * Knoxville Campaign (Burnside), (Foster)
 * Atlanta Campaign (Schofield)
 * Battle of Franklin (Schofield)
 * Battle of Nashville (Schofield)
 * Carolinas Campaign (Schofield)

Orders of Battle
Notes
 * Shiloh Union order of battle
 * Perryville Union order of battle
 * Knoxville Union order of battle
 * Atlanta Campaign Union order of battle
 * Franklin Union order of battle
 * Nashville Union order of battle
 * Wilmington Union order of battle

1. Livermore, Thomas L., Numbers and Losses in the American Civil War 1861–1865, New York, 1901, p. 95, cited in McDonough, James Lee, War in Kentucky, University of Tennessee Press, 1994, pp 289–290. ISBN 0-87049-847-9. Noe, Kenneth W. Perryville: This Grand Havoc of Battle. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2001. ISBN 978-0-8131-2209-0.

title: Army of the Ohio


text:
Talk:Anarchism in Spain/to do

 * CITE THROUGHOUT. The article was written before this was standard Wikipedia policy.
 * Acquire an image for the intro that applies universally to Spanish anarchism.
 * Outline the role of the anarchists in the Civil War with details.
 * Add information on the specifics of collectivizations and occupations during the Revolution.
 * Expand information on anarchism in modern Spain.
 * Expand feminism section.
 * Work on making the article NPOV without weakening it needlessly (i.e, introducing conflicts over the legitimacy of anarchism; the article should be centered on the actions and thoughts of the anarchists). Remove florid descriptions or blatant praise where/if they still exist.
 * Create articles for all red linked pages.
 * Eventually get approved as a Featured Article

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Anarchism in Spain/to do


text:
Glossary of game theory

Game theory is the branch of mathematics in which games are studied: that is, models describing human behaviour. This is a glossary of some terms of the subject.

Notational conventions
$$ \sigma\ _i $$ is an element of $$ \Sigma\ ^i $$. $$ \sigma\ _{-i} $$ an element of $$ \Sigma\ ^{-i} = \prod_{ j \in \mathrm{N}, j \ne i} \Sigma\ ^j $$, is a tuple of strategies for all players other than i.
 * Real numbers : $$ \mathbb{R} $$.
 * The set of players : $$ \mathrm{N} $$.
 * Strategy space : $$ \Sigma\ = \prod_{i \in \mathrm{N}} \Sigma\ ^i $$, where
 * Player i's strategy space : $$ \Sigma\ ^i $$ is the space of all possible ways in which player i can play the game.
 * A strategy for player i :
 * Complements :
 * Outcome space : $$ \Gamma$$ is in most textbooks identical to -
 * Payoffs : $$ \mathbb{R} ^ \mathrm{N} $$, describing how much gain (money, pleasure, etc.) the players are allocated by the end of the game.

Normal form game
A game in normal form is a function:
 * $$ \pi\ : \prod_{i\in \mathrm{N}} \Sigma\ ^ i \to \mathbb{R}^\mathrm{N}$$

Given the tuple of strategies chosen by the players, one is given an allocation of payments (given as real numbers).

A further generalization can be achieved by splitting the game into a composition of two functions:
 * $$ \pi\ : \prod_{i \in \mathrm{N}} \Sigma\ ^i \to \Gamma$$

the outcome function of the game (some authors call this function "the game form"), and:
 * $$ \nu\ : \Gamma\ \to \mathbb{R}^\mathrm{N} $$

the allocation of payoffs (or preferences) to players, for each outcome of the game.

Extensive form game
This is given by a tree, where at each vertex of the tree a different player has the choice of choosing an edge. The outcome set of an extensive form game is usually the set of tree leaves.

Cooperative game
A game in which players are allowed to form coalitions (and to enforce coalitionary discipline). A cooperative game is given by stating a value for every coalition:
 * $$ \nu\ : 2^{\mathbb{P}(N)} \to \mathbb{R}$$

It is always assumed that the empty coalition gains nil. Solution concepts for cooperative games usually assume that the players are forming the grand coalition $$ N $$, whose value $$ \nu(N) $$ is then divided among the players to give an allocation.

Simple game
A Simple game is a simplified form of a cooperative game, where the possible gain is assumed to be either '0' or '1'. A simple game is couple (N, W), where W is the list of "winning" coalitions, capable of gaining the loot ('1'), and N is the set of players.

Glossary

 * Acceptable game : is a game form such that for every possible preference profiles, the game has pure nash equilibria, all of which are pareto efficient.

 * Allocation of goods : is a function $$ \nu\ : \Gamma\ \to \mathbb{R} ^\mathrm{N} $$. The allocation is a cardinal approach for determining the good (e.g. money) the players are granted under the different outcomes of the game.

\forall \sigma\ _i \in\ \Sigma\ ^i \quad \quad \pi\ (\sigma\ _i ,\sigma\ _{-i} ) \le \pi\ (\tau\ _i ,\sigma\ _{-i} ) $$.
 * Best reply : the best reply to a given complement $$ \sigma\ _{-i} $$ is a strategy $$ \tau\ _i $$ that maximizes player i's payment. Formally, we want: $$

 * Coalition : is any subset of the set of players: $$ \mathrm{S} \subseteq \mathrm{N} $$.

 * Condorcet winner : Given a preference ν on the outcome space, an outcome a is a condorcet winner if all non-dummy players prefer a to all other outcomes.

 * Decidability : In relation to game theory, refers to the question of the existence of an algorithm that can and will return an answer as to whether a game can be solved or not.

 * Determinacy : A subfield of set theory that examines the conditions under which one or the other player of a game has a winning strategy, and the consequences of the existence of such strategies. Games studied in set theory are Gale–Stewart games – two-player games of perfect information in which the players make an infinite sequence of moves and there are no draws.

 * Determined game (or Strictly determined game) : In game theory, a strictly determined game is a two-player zero-sum game that has at least one Nash equilibrium with both players using pure strategies.

 * Dictator: A player is a strong dictator if he can guarantee any outcome regardless of the other players. $$m \in \mathbb{N}$$ is a weak dictator if he can guarantee any outcome, but his strategies for doing so might depend on the complement strategy vector. Naturally, every strong dictator is a weak dictator. Formally: n is a Strong dictator if: $$ \forall a \in \mathrm{A}, \; \exist \sigma\ _n \in \Sigma\ ^n \; s.t. \; \forall \sigma\ _{-n} \in \Sigma\ ^{-n}: \; \Gamma\ (\sigma\ _{-n},\sigma\ _n) = a $$ m is a Weak dictator if: $$ \forall a \in \mathrm{A}, \; \forall \sigma\ _{-m} \in \Sigma\ ^{-m} \; \exist \sigma\ _m \in \Sigma\ ^m \; s.t. \; \Gamma\ (\sigma\ _{-m},\sigma\ _m) = a $$
 * Another way to put it is:
 * A strong dictator is $$\alpha$$-effective for every possible outcome.
 * A weak dictator is $$\beta$$-effective for every possible outcome.
 * A game can have no more than one strong dictator. Some games have multiple weak dictators (in rock-paper-scissors both players are weak dictators but none is a strong dictator).
 * Also see Effectiveness. Antonym: dummy.

\forall j \in \mathrm{N} \; \quad  \nu\ _j (a) \le\ \nu\ _j (b) $$ for domination, and $$ \exists i \in \mathrm{N} \; s.t. \; \nu\ _i (a)  <  \nu\ _i (b) $$ for strict domination. An outcome a is (strictly) dominated if it is (strictly) dominated by some other outcome. An outcome a is dominated for a coalition S if all players in S prefer some other outcome to a. See also Condorcet winner.
 * Dominated outcome : Given a preference ν on the outcome space, we say that an outcome a is dominated by outcome b (hence, b is the dominant strategy) if it is preferred by all players. If, in addition, some player strictly prefers b over a, then we say that a is strictly dominated. Formally: $$

\forall \sigma\ _{-i} \in\ \Sigma\ ^{-i} \quad \quad \pi\ (\sigma\ _i ,\sigma\ _{-i} ) \le \pi\ (\tau\ _i ,\sigma\ _{-i} ) $$ and $$ \exists \sigma\ _{-i} \in\ \Sigma\ ^{-i} \quad s.t. \quad \pi\ (\sigma\ _i ,\sigma\ _{-i} ) < \pi\ (\tau\ _i ,\sigma\ _{-i} ) $$. A strategy σ is (strictly) dominated if it is (strictly) dominated by some other strategy.
 * Dominated strategy : we say that strategy is (strongly) dominated by strategy $$ \tau\ _i $$ if for any complement strategies tuple $$ \sigma\ _{-i} $$, player i benefits by playing $$ \tau\ _i $$. Formally speaking: $$

 * Dummy : A player i is a dummy if he has no effect on the outcome of the game. I.e. if the outcome of the game is insensitive to player i's strategy.
 * Antonyms: say, veto, dictator.

 * Effectiveness : A coalition (or a single player) S is effective for  a if it can force a to be the outcome of the game. S is α-effective if the members of S have strategies s.t. no matter what the complement of S does, the outcome will be a.
 * S is β-effective if for any strategies of the complement of S, the members of S can answer with strategies that ensure outcome a.

 * Finite game : is a game with finitely many players, each of which has a finite set of strategies.

 * Grand coalition : refers to the coalition containing all players. In cooperative games it is often assumed that the grand coalition forms and the purpose of the game is to find stable imputations.

 * Mixed strategy : for player i is a probability distribution P on $$ \Sigma\ ^i $$. It is understood that player i chooses a strategy randomly according to P.

 * Mixed Nash Equilibrium : Same as Pure Nash Equilibrium, defined on the space of mixed strategies. Every finite game has Mixed Nash Equilibria.

 * Pareto efficiency : An outcome a of game form π is (strongly) pareto efficient if it is undominated under all preference profiles.

 * Preference profile : is a function $$ \nu\ : \Gamma\ \to \mathbb{R} ^\mathrm{N} $$. This is the ordinal approach at describing the outcome of the game. The preference describes how 'pleased' the players are with the possible outcomes of the game. See allocation of goods.

\forall i \in \mathrm{N} \quad \forall \tau\ _i \in\ \Sigma\ ^i \quad \pi\ (\tau\ ,\sigma\ _{-i} ) \le \pi\ (\sigma\ ) $$. No equilibrium point is dominated.
 * Pure Nash Equilibrium : An element $$ \sigma\ = (\sigma\ _i) _ {i \in \mathrm{N}} $$ of the strategy space of a game is a pure nash equilibrium point if no player i can benefit by deviating from his strategy $$ \sigma\ _i $$, given that the other players are playing in $$ \sigma$$. Formally: $$

 * Say : A player i has a Say if he is not a Dummy, i.e. if there is some tuple of complement strategies s.t. π (σ_i) is not a constant function.
 * Antonym: Dummy.

 * Shannon number : A conservative lower bound of the game-tree complexity of chess (10120).

 * Solved game : A game whose outcome (win, lose or draw) can be correctly predicted assuming perfect play from all players.

 * Value : A value of a game is a rationally expected outcome. There are more than a few definitions of value, describing different methods of obtaining a solution to the game.

 * Veto : A veto denotes the ability (or right) of some player to prevent a specific alternative from being the outcome of the game. A player who has that ability is called a veto player.
 * Antonym: Dummy.

 * Weakly acceptable game : is a game that has pure nash equilibria some of which are pareto efficient.

\forall \gamma\ \in \Gamma\ \sum_{i \in \mathrm{N}} \nu\ _i (\gamma\ ) = const. $$ w.l.g. we can assume that constant to be zero. In a zero-sum game, one player's gain is another player's loss. Most classical board games (e.g. chess, checkers) are zero sum.
 * Zero sum game : is a game in which the allocation is constant over different outcomes. Formally: $$

title: Glossary of game theory


text:
Category:Fuel cells

A fuel cell is an electrochemical energy conversion device. Fuel cells differ from batteries in that they are designed for continuous replenishment of the reactants consumed;

title: Category:Fuel cells


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over-masturbation

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 02:54, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

Over-masturbation
This article contains nonsense. — J3ff 03:01, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Not nonsense, but delete as original research unless references can be provided. Kappa 03:12, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to masturbation. Discuss the effects of over-masturbation there, with references to medical literature plz. —Charles P. (Mirv) 03:17, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the assertion that it's a "serious problem among adolescents", as well as most of the symptoms, are products of the author's imagination. I wouldn't even call it original research, it's just a BJAODN attempt but without the humour or subtlety to make it to BJAODN. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  03:18, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as twaddle. -- Hoary 03:43, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC)
 * Delete. I had a dirty joke all ready to go, but I'll save it for a more worthy target. 23skidoo 04:18, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV original research, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 05:55, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm sure the extreme fatique can be true in some cases, but all the other problems are simply untrue (total fiction). Delete. Mgm|(talk) 08:44, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Definete delete - Does not merit a separate encyclopedia entry
 * Delete. Do not redirect, there is no reason to believe that "over-masturbation" is term that people are going to search on. --BM 21:36, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. ComCat.
 * Delete, or transwiki to Wankipedia. Antandrus 04:19, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * LOL!! That comment alone is worth a BJAODN and a Barnstar.  Delete the article, BTW.  The part about lacerations scared me. - Lucky 6.9 22:20, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete POV/original research/neo-christian bullshit (no lacerations yet and I'm 31!!!!!) max rspct 22:43, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even worth a redirect. Just get rid of it.  It serves no useful purpose. -- Cabhan 04:01, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete what does this tell anyone? Brookie 14:13, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byron Smart

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 02:53, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

Byron Smart
reinstate or e;se


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greely Middle School

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 02:57, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

Greely Middle School
non-notable middle school. — J3ff 03:04, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yet another school that produces students who appear to be unable to write a remotely interesting article about the school (are there any schools that offer no extracurricular activities? Does anything differentiate this school at all from a thousand other establishments?). I'd suggest merging with the local geographical article, but at the moment there isn't anything worth merging. Average Earthman 03:46, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * What a great school - the kids can write a useless article about it on Wikipedia. Delete and I'm not sending my kids there. Alphax (t) (c) (e) 07:43, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Gently delete, no info worth merging, not different from any other school in the world. Mgm|(talk) 08:46, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Make a mention in Cumberland, Maine and delete - Skysmith 11:44, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no useful content whatsoever. —Korath (Talk) 16:14, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Maine School Administrative District 51. Niteowlneils 16:37, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Agree with Niteowlneils. Redirect.  This is just useless as an article at present. - Lucky 6.9 17:09, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cumberland, Maine. All schools are notable in my opinion, but the information presented here only merits a minor merge/redirect.  GRider\talk 19:21, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg (talk) 21:53, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Spinboy 00:08, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Middle schools are like pennies.  Most of them are worth: a penny.  A very few of them are worth more to collectors.   This school is like the pennies that are worth a penny.  Not -notable. --BM 01:21, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Inherently notable Sheesh! Did I say that? Delete Denni ☯ 02:23, 2005 Feb 8 (UTC)
 * You did! You did!  I thought I'd have to send a cyber-Wiki-noogie your way.  Had me worried there, Denni...welcome back!!!!! - Lucky 6.9 01:50, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Aw shucks, Lucky - someone has to keep these egregious inclusionists in line. (Blush). Denni ☯ 04:12, 2005 Feb 9 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see anything that sets it apart from thousands of other schools. Carrp | Talk 01:47, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not established. Indrian 20:17, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. 05:09, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: Above vote was made by User:Gwalla --Andylkl 13:50, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep. Inherently notable and has potential to be encyclopedic. (And I don't appreciate the "humour" for using those 2 words) --Andylkl 13:50, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Welcome back, Lenni.  I mean Denni. —RaD Man (talk) 19:56, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't even rise to the level of a yellow pages entry. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:17, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)


text:
Jack Casady

John William Casady (born April 13, 1944) is an American bass guitarist, best known as a member of Jefferson Airplane and Hot Tuna. Jefferson Airplane became the first successful exponent of the San Francisco Sound. Singles including "Somebody to Love" and "White Rabbit" charted in 1967 and 1968. Casady, along with the other members of Jefferson Airplane, was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1996.

Early life
Casady was born in Washington D.C., the son of Mary Virginia (née Quimby) and William Robert Casady. His father was of half Irish Protestant and half Polish Jewish ancestry. His mother was a relative of aviator Harriet Quimby; some of her family had been in North America since the 1600s.

First playing as a lead guitarist with the Washington, D.C.-area rhythm and blues band The Triumphs, he switched to bass during his high school years, and while still underage (and with a forged I.D.) played the Washington D.C. club scene, backing artists such as Little Anthony and the Imperials.

Jefferson Airplane years 1965–1972
Casady became the bass player for Jefferson Airplane when lead guitarist Jorma Kaukonen, a high school friend and former Triumphs rhythm guitarist, invited him to join in late September 1965. He replaced the band's original bassist Bob Harvey the following month.

Casady stepped beyond the bass guitar's conventional supporting role in rock & roll, in order to explore melodic ideas suggested by the rhythms and chord progressions. His impact was immediately evident on Airplane's debut album Jefferson Airplane Takes Off (1966), on tracks such as "Let Me In" and "Run Around".

The Takes Off LP quotes Marty Balin as saying "He carries it. He's been with James Brown and other groups and he knows." There is, however, no evidence Casady had ever played with James Brown. The live Airplane album Bless Its Pointed Little Head, recorded in 1968, demonstrates Casady's unique walking line style to the fullest, as his Guild Starfire bass signal went through a Versatone amplifier, which produced a distinctive growling sound when the instrument was played in a high register. The Fred Neil track "The Other Side of This Life" remains a quintessential example of his style. On later Airplane albums, such as Bark, Long John Silver and the live Thirty Seconds Over Winterland, Casady switched over to a $4,000 custom-made Alembic bass (No. 001, the first made by the company). The extraordinarily grand sound Casady produced during his 1968–1971 heyday—nowhere better heard than in his multi-tracked playing on "Sunrise", a song from Paul Kantner's 1970 solo album Blows Against the Empire—inspired fans to assign him the affectionate nickname of "God".

Other noteworthy Casady performances on Jefferson Airplane recordings include the Top 10 hit "White Rabbit" (on the album Surrealistic Pillow, 1967), "Rejoyce" and "Watch Her Ride" (After Bathing at Baxter's, 1967), "Crown of Creation", "If You Feel" and "The House at Pooneil Corners" (Crown of Creation, 1968), "Crazy Miranda" and "War Movie" (Bark, 1971), and the co-written composition "Long John Silver" (Long John Silver, 1972). Several of these tracks are remarkable for their infusions of jazz and raga bass lines into a rock format. For years in live performance with the Airplane, Casady's showcase was the Paul Kantner composition "The Ballad of You and Me and Pooneil", which gave the bassist the opportunity to improvize an open-ended solo that was different every night and often astonishing. The Fly Jefferson Airplane DVD includes one such performance videotaped at The Family Dog, where Casady pulls off a solo that visibly impresses fellow band member Grace Slick. He was likewise adept at complementing the musicianship of his fellow players; the live version of "Volunteers" on the Woodstock album is a notable example of cooperating bass and keyboard rhythm with session pianist Nicky Hopkins.

Casady's appetite for playing led him to do extensive moonlighting during his Airplane tenure. Not only did he perform live on stage with Jimi Hendrix during 1968, he also played bass on the Jimi Hendrix song "Voodoo Chile", from the Electric Ladyland album released in the same year (some copies of the album misspell his name as Cassidy). He also occasionally played with other key San Francisco bands Grateful Dead, Country Joe and the Fish and James and the Good Brothers. Furthermore, he was a member of two short-lived splinter groups, Mickey and the Heartbeats (with Jerry Garcia and Mickey Hart) and Jack Casady and the Degenerates, an ensemble that included teenage friend Danny Gatton alongside Kaukonen. Neither of these groups ever recorded, though live tapes are in circulation. Later, Casady was to appear on David Crosby's If I Could Only Remember My Name (1971), Roky Erickson's album Don't Slander Me (1982) and Warren Zevon's Transverse City (1989). He also produced Jorma Kaukonen's first solo album, the critically acclaimed Quah, in 1975.

Hot Tuna
Casady and Kaukonen formed Hot Tuna in 1969, and they still perform to the present day. The group has morphed over the years from an acoustic blues unit to an electric boogie band to a rampaging metal act and back again. Casady is equally comfortable accompanying an acoustic Kaukonen ("Mann's Fate", 1970) or electric jamming ("John's Other", 1971). Casady's solo on "Candy Man" (Hot Tuna's First Pull Up, Then Pull Down, 1971) again shows his ability to carry a melody rather than just playing rhythmically and harmonically. Some exquisitely intricate playing is evident on the 1972 album Burgers, particularly the sparkling instrumental track "Water Song", which Casady has described as featuring "lead bass". Another Burgers track, "Sunny Day Strut", has Casady's bass dueling with Kaukonen's lead guitar. When Tuna became a power trio in the mid-1970s, Casady's Guild Flying V custom bass became his trademark. Later works, especially Live in Japan (1997), still testify to his creativity as evidenced by the continually evolving bass solos on "Candy Man", "Good Shepherd" and "99 Year Blues".

SVT and The Yanks
In the late 1970s, Casady and Kaukonen found that they needed some creative time apart, and Hot Tuna disbanded for several years. During this time, Casady helped found a modern rock band, SVT, with Brian Marnell, a promising songwriter and frontman, keyboardist Nick Buck, and drummer Bill Gibson, later replaced by Paul Zahl. Again, Casady's versatility was demonstrated as this band played in a convincing New Wave style, totally removed from Hot Tuna and Jefferson Airplane. During his SVT tenure, Casady actually taped his fingers together to force himself to simplify his highly articulated playing style. He and Zahl formed an exemplary rhythm section, as evidenced on the LP No Regrets (1981). After Marnell's death from a drug overdose Casady and Zahl continued the basic SVT sound with guitarist Jack Johnson and singer/songwriter/guitarist Owen Masterson in a band called The Yanks. Also during the 1980s, Casady joined former Airplane members Paul Kantner and Marty Balin in the KBC Band.

Jefferson Starship
In 1992, he joined Paul Kantner's recreated Jefferson Starship, and appeared on the albums Deep Space / Virgin Sky and Windows of Heaven. In 2000, Kantner used the name Jefferson Airplane against the terms of his 1985 settlement with Grace Slick, Jorma Kaukonen, Bill Thompson, and Casady. Casady left Jefferson Starship after this incident. Casady appears with Kantner again on the 2008 Jefferson Starship release, Jefferson's Tree of Liberty from a track previously recorded for the German release of Windows of Heaven.

Dream Factor
Not a singer and never a prolific songwriter, it was not until June 2003 that Casady released his first solo album, Dream Factor, which he co-produced with Greg Hampton. Like other Airplane-related solo works it featured substantial support from other players such as Warren Haynes, Doyle Bramhall II, Jorma Kaukonen, Fee Waybill, Ivan Neville, the group Box Set, and many other musician friends.

Currently, as well as performing with Hot Tuna, Casady teaches bass workshops at Jorma Kaukonen's Fur Peace Ranch in Ohio.

Casady helped design, in conjunction with Epiphone, the "Jack Casady Signature Bass", a 34-inch scale hollow-body electric bass with single low-impedance humbucker pickup and a floating bridge. The instrument is based on Casady's mid-1970s Gibson Les Paul Signature bass which he bought in the 1980s.

Moonalice
In 2007, Casady joined a new band, Moonalice, whose members include former Jefferson Starship bassist and Hot Tuna keyboardist Pete Sears, along with G. E. Smith, Barry Sless, Ann McNamee, Roger McNamee, and Jimmy Sanchez. The first Moonalice studio album was released in April 2009.

Musical approach
A bass instructional video has him repeating the word "drama" in regards to his sound/tone. Casady is widely known for the commanding tonal quality of his playing, something that he acknowledges is deliberate. He has remarked that tone is the most essential quality for an electric bassist, stating "Tone is your signature as to who you are... The music builds around the tone. It isn’t just a series of notes or the articulation or the technique. The signature sound of a great musician is his tone and that sets him apart from others."

Discography
Jack Casady Jefferson Airplane Hot Tuna Jefferson Starship Moonalice Michael Falzarano
 * Dream Factor (2003)
 * Jefferson Airplane Takes Off (1966)
 * Surrealistic Pillow (1967)
 * After Bathing at Baxter's (1967)
 * Crown of Creation (1968)
 * Bless Its Pointed Little Head (1969)
 * Volunteers (1969)
 * Bark (1971)
 * Long John Silver (1972)
 * Thirty Seconds Over Winterland (1973)
 * Jefferson Airplane (1989)
 * Live at the Fillmore East (1998)
 * Sweeping Up the Spotlight (2007)
 * The Woodstock Experience (2009)
 * Hot Tuna (1970)
 * First Pull Up, Then Pull Down (1971)
 * Burgers (1972)
 * The Phosphorescent Rat (1974)
 * America's Choice (1975)
 * Yellow Fever (1975)
 * Hoppkorv (1976)
 * Double Dose (1978)
 * Pair a Dice Found (1990)
 * Live at Sweetwater (1992)
 * Live at Sweetwater Two (1993)
 * Live in Japan (1997)
 * And Furthurmore... (1999)
 * Steady as She Goes (2011)
 * Bear's Sonic Journals: Before We Were Them (2019)
 * Deep Space/Virgin Sky (1995)
 * Windows of Heaven (1999)
 * Moonalice (2009)
 * A Kaleidoscope Christmas (2020)

title: Jack Casady


text:
Modern pentathlon at the 1980 Summer Olympics

The modern pentathlon at the 1980 Summer Olympics was represented by two events (both for men): Individual competition and Team competition. As usual in Olympic modern pentathlon one competition was held and each competitor's score was included to the Individual competition event results table and was also added to his teammates' scores to be included to the Team competition event results table. This competition consisted of 5 disciplines which were held in 4 venues:
 * 1) Equestrian held on July 20 at the Trade Unions Equestrian Centre situated in the Bitsa forest park (southern part of Moscow)
 * 2) Fencing held on July 21 at the Sports Palace of the Central Sports Club of the Army (south-western part of Moscow)
 * 3) Shooting held on July 22 at the Dynamo Shooting Range in Mytishchi (south-eastern part of Moscow)
 * 4) Swimming held on July 23 at the Swimming Pool of the Olympiski Sports Complex (central part of Moscow)
 * 5) Cross-country held on July 24 at the Trade Unions Equestrian Centre

Participating nations
A total of 43 athletes from 17 nations competed at the Moscow Games:


text:
Inferior alveolar nerve

The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) (also the inferior dental nerve) is a sensory branch of the mandibular nerve (CN V3) (which is itself the third branch of the trigeminal nerve (CN V)). The nerve provides sensory innervation to the lower/mandibular teeth and their corresponding gingiva as well as a small area of the face (via its mental nerve).

Origin
The inferior alveolar nerve arises from the mandibular nerve.

Course
After branching from the mandibular nerve, the inferior alveolar nerve passes posterior to the lateral pterygoid muscle. It issues a branch (the mylohyoid nerve) before entering the mandibular foramen to come to pass in the mandibular canal within the mandible. Passing through the canal, it issues sensory branches for the molar and second premolar teeth; the branches first form the inferior dental plexus which then gives off small gingival and dental nerves to these teeth themselves.

The nerve terminates distally/anteriorly (near the second lower premolar) within the mandibular canal by splitting into its two terminal branches: the mental nerve, and the incisive branch.

Mental nerve
The mental nerve emerges from the mandibular canal through the mental foramen and provides sensory innervation to the chin and lower lip.

Incisive branch
The incisive branch represents the anterior continuation of the inferior alveolar nerve. It continues to course within the mandible in the mandibular incisive canal either as a single nerve or by forming the incisive plexus. It provides sensory innervation to the lower/mandibular premolar, canine, incisor teeth as well as their associated gingiva.

Distribution
The inferior alveolar nerves supply sensation to the lower teeth, and, via the mental nerve, sensation to the chin and lower lip.

The mylohyoid nerve is a motor nerve supplying the mylohyoid and the anterior belly of the digastric.

Variation
Rarely, a bifid inferior alveolar nerve may be present, in which case a second mandibular foramen, more inferiorly placed, exists and can be detected by noting a doubled mandibular canal on a radiograph.

Injury
Inferior nerve injury most commonly occurs during surgery including wisdom tooth, dental implant placement in the mandible, root canal treatment where tooth roots are close to the nerve canal in the mandible, deep dental local anaesthetic injections or orthognathic surgery. Trauma and related mandibular fractures are also often related to inferior alveolar nerve injuries.

Trigeminal sensory nerve injuries are associated with numbness, pain, altered sensation and usually a combination of all three. This can result in a significant reduction in quality of life with functional difficulties and psychological impact.

The risk associated with wisdom tooth surgery is commonly accepted to be 2% temporary and 0.2% permanent. However, this risk assessment is not concrete as the same source is cited for lingual nerve paresthesia. It is well documented that inferior alveolar nerve injury is more common than lingual nerve injury. The percentage of injury varies significantly in different studies. Furthermore, many factors affect the incidence of nerve injury. For example, the incidence of nerve injury in teens removing third molars is much lower than the incidence in patients 25 and older. This risk increases 10 fold if the tooth is close to the inferior dental canal containing the inferior alveolar nerve (as judged on a dental radiograph). These high risk wisdom teeth can be further assessed using cone beam CT imaging to assess and plan surgery to minimise nerve injury by careful extraction or undertaking a coronectomy procedure in healthy patients with healthy teeth. The risk of nerve injury in relation to mandibular dental implants is not known but it is a recognised risk requiring the patient to be warned. If an injury occurs urgent treatment is required. The risk nerve injury in relation deep dental injections has a risk of injury in approximately 1:14,000 with 25% of these remaining persistent. Routine preoperative warnings about these injuries should occur before surgery, and represent good practice. Inferior alveolar nerve injury secondary to orthodontic treatment is also emerging in the literature in the recent years as a rare complication and manifested as anesthesia, paresthesia, or combination of both; however full recovery was achieved in all of the reported cases when proper management was applied.

Anesthesia
During dental procedures, a local nerve block may be applied. Anaesthetic injected near the mandibular foramen to block the inferior alveolar nerve and the nearby lingual nerve (supplying the tongue). This causes loss of sensation on the same side as the block to:
 * the teeth (inferior alveolar nerve block)
 * the lower lip and chin (mental nerve block)
 * front two-thirds of the tongue (lingual nerve block).

Studies found that oral medications of NSAIDs taken before the dental procedure increases the efficacy of the anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

title: Inferior alveolar nerve


text:
User:Stbob

StBob lives in Fredericksburg, Virginia.

[ISP Guru] [Rehistorian] [Photo collector]

title: User:Stbob


text:
Talk:Odwalla

Plant a Tree
Could we get a section on their effort/annual programs to plant trees in state parks? 168.179.217.57 (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Origin of the Name Odwalla
The information on "Illustrum" in the Origin section is incorrect. On the liner notes to the Art Ensemble of Chicago's "Fanfare for the Warriors," the recording that "Illustrum" appears in, the music for the piece is attributed to Malachi Favors and the myth/poem to Joseph Jarman. Roscoe Mitchell did later write a piece called "Odwalla," which appears on the Art Ensemble's recording "Bap-tizum." But it was Jarman who created the myth/poem for "Illustrum" and gave the character the name Odwalla. 162.90.144.23 (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Jeffrey Schanzer

Intro
The intro to this article seriously needs work. Its paragraphs are uneven, the information is poorly organized, and some of it's redundant. Tezero (talk) 02:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

 * ✅ Bod (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071006151449/http://www.dinuba.org/labor.html to http://www.dinuba.org/labor.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090203061859/http://www.bevindustry.com:80/Archives_Davinci?article=1996 to http://www.bevindustry.com/Archives_Davinci?article=1996

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 one external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070211104938/http://biz.yahoo.com:80/ic/46/46046.html to http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/46/46046.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080509010301/http://www.odwalla.com:80/WhoWeAre.jsp to http://www.odwalla.com/WhoWeAre.jsp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120304231608/http://www.mendeley.com:80/research/purifying-tainted-corporate-image-odwallas-response-e-coli-poisoning-1/ to http://www.mendeley.com/research/purifying-tainted-corporate-image-odwallas-response-e-coli-poisoning-1/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090203084516/http://www.beverageworld.com:80/content/view/5454/169 to http://www.beverageworld.com/content/view/5454/169
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090203084419/http://www.beverageworld.com:80/content/view/33993/144/ to http://www.beverageworld.com/content/view/33993/144/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090126235738/http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com:80/presscenter/pdfs/fs/fs_fs1.pdf to http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/presscenter/pdfs/fs/fs_fs1.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080826070126/http://www.ajc.com:80/news/content/hotjobs/careercenter/articles/2008/07/14/cokefreeze_0712.html to http://www.ajc.com/news/content/hotjobs/careercenter/articles/2008/07/14/cokefreeze_0712.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080714023622/http://www.odwalla.com:80/Freshology.jsp to http://www.odwalla.com/Freshology.jsp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090225132100/http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/presscenter/pdfs/fs/fs_pr6.pdf to http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/presscenter/pdfs/fs/fs_pr6.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080607210226/http://www.odwalla.com:80/SiteMap.jsp to http://www.odwalla.com/SiteMap.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203035130/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1154/is_n2_v82/ai_14981633 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1154/is_n2_v82/ai_14981633/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203035004/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_July_1/ai_55049958 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_July_1/ai_55049958
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203034136/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2000_July_6/ai_63179563 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2000_July_6/ai_63179563
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203034141/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2000_May_3/ai_61875835 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2000_May_3/ai_61875835
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203034207/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FNP/is_21_41/ai_94327778 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FNP/is_21_41/ai_94327778
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203035526/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3289/is_n5_v163/ai_15433389 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3289/is_n5_v163/ai_15433389
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203035000/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_Dec_20/ai_58307855 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_Dec_20/ai_58307855

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203041617/http://www.csnews.com/csn/products/pack_bev/product_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003650160 to http://www.csnews.com/csn/products/pack_bev/product_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003650160
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203041723/http://www.csnews.com/csn/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002155178 to http://www.csnews.com/csn/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002155178

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005135647/http://www.fool.com/ddouble/2000/ddouble001127.htm to http://www.fool.com/ddouble/2000/ddouble001127.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203073245/http://www.fool.com/news/foolplate/2001/foolplate011030.htm?terms=odwalla&vstest=search_042607_linkdefault to http://www.fool.com/news/foolplate/2001/foolplate011030.htm?terms=odwalla&vstest=search_042607_linkdefault

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

FA in need of review
This Featured Article was promoted in 2008 and has never been reviewed since. The main editor has left Wikipedia in 2009, which has left the article permanently stuck in 2007/2008.

The brand was recently discontinued and this is how the History section ends:

"Coca-Cola promoted Odwalla products in 2006 when the company aimed at removing carbonated soda products in schools.[37] Odwalla continued to have good growth in 2007, when Coca-Cola, squeezed by poor growth in its North American markets, issued a company-wide hiring freeze; Odwalla, because of its good performance, was one of the few exceptions to the rule.[38] In July 2020, Coca-Cola announced the permanent discontinuation of all Odwalla products, having declared Odwalla one of its "zombie brands" (brands which comprise less than 2% of total revenue)."

There is a 13-year gap there that is not befitting of a Featured Article.

I also found the following scholarly works, that cover a E. coli outbreak and how the company reacted to it, that ought to be included in the article:
 * Complexities of Crisis Renewal Over Time: Learning from the Tainted Odwalla Apple Juice Case
 * Integrating public relations and legal responses during a crisis: The case of Odwalla, Inc.
 * Building resilience for uncertain times

Since the article has not been updated, coupled with the failure to integrate recent scholarly works that offer a retrospective look on the response to the 1996 E. coli outbreak, means that this article fails criteria 1. b) of Featured Articles, comprehensiveness. If the above issues are not corrected, the article may be nominated for Featured Article review. RetiredDuke (talk) 17:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with RetiredDuke about the additional use of sources that might be useful for the 1996 E. Coli outbreak section. I also think the sources should be reevaluated, with fool.com removed as it is an unreliable source. I would also like to see information about the company between 2006 and 2020. Z1720 (talk) 22:11, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

 * I agree as well. I don't think this is featured-article quality.

Possible image?
The French article includes in the infobox, is it possible that this article can also include it? There is some copyright stuff that might not allow this though... Thanks - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Odwalla


text: Category:961 deaths

title: Category:961 deaths


text:
Talk:Milwaukee Brewers

post-Braves, pre-Pilots
This article is really shaping up nicely - I agree that the Milwaukee Braves stuff more properly belongs in the Atlanta Braves' entry, and the Seattle Pilots information belongs here. I have added some information about the post-Braves, pre-Pilots era, including Bud Selig's attempts to draw an expansion franchise, the White Sox games played at County Stadium and Selig's deal to move the White Sox because they all relate directly to the founding of the Milwaukee Brewers.Chancemichaels 16:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Chancemichaels

The chronology is a little messed up. The expansion franchises were awarded for inaugural play in 1969, yet the the history says that the strong attendance at Sox games in Milwaukee in 1969 got everyone's hopes up but they were dashed when Montreal, San Diego, Seattle and KC got expansion franchises. This actually happened in 1968, when the extraordinarily strong attendance wasn't rewarded with an expansion franchise. In 1969, the Pilots had already been born, and they actually played a game at County Stadium. How could it be better and more accurately worded? The material is well-researched and referenced.

Uniform Changes 1978-1993
I'm reverting to the original wording - "the road cap was eliminated" is, I believe, more appropriate than "the yellow panel on the front of the cap turned blue".

First of all, the new sentence is clunky. The front of the cap "turned blue"? Second of all, MLB describes uniform changes using the original words - uniform elements such as alternate caps and uniforms are "added" and "eliminated." -- Chancemichaels 13:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Chancemichaels

All time record
I changed the all-time record back to 2,761 wins, 3,100 losses (.471 winning percentage), to reflect the record at the end of the 2005 season. WP is not a news service. --mtz206 (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Again, WP is not a news service, and we should not introduce content that requires daily updates in order to remain accurate. I don't see the utility in constantly updating their "all-time record" as each game occurs. --mtz206 (talk) 19:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Mtz206. Readers can go elsewhere to find daily statistics. Royalbroil 21:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Topic headers
Just wondering what the point of "Yes! Yes! A Pennant!" is. I believe "We're Taking This Thing National" was actually the team's slogan the year they changed leagues, so there is actually significance to that. Unless there's some significance here that I'm missing, I'd propose that "Yes! Yes! A Pennant!" be removed. It comes off as being a bit frivolous. Dhmachine31 22:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

 * "Yes! Yes! A Pennant!" was the headline in the Milwaukee Sentinel the day after the Brewers won the ALCS. We should include the graphic to justify the headline.  --Chancemichaels 15:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Chancemichaels

 * Looking at it again, there is a graphic to justify the headline. Prominently displayed in the "1982 memorabilia" photo is a copy of the newspaper.  What do you all think about adding the headline back in?  --38.117.200.131 20:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Chancemichaels

Going National
In the section "Going National", the writer suggests that the only necessity for having an even-number of teams in each league (and thus necessitating the move of Milwaukee to the National League) is that Major League Baseball was interested in interleague play. This doesn't make sense... interleague play would actually work just fine if each league had 15 teams... all 15 teams would play each section of the schedule with in-league games only and there were an odd number of teams then one team would always have an off day, or, actually, an off-series. The odd team out would have to have 3 days off in a row while the other teams played their 3-game series! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.142.191 (talk • contribs) 16:04, July 9, 2006

I read that and found it other, and no one would be left out of the schedule. Each league needs an even number of teams regardless of the presence or absence of interleague play, because when a league is playing a odd too. I think the original writer meant intraleague play. MLB would need an interleague series all season long if each division had 15 teams and they still wanted off days primarily only Monday and Thursday. I'm going to change it. If anyone feels it is more correct the old way, by all means fix it.Failureofafriend 00:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I think the phrase "both leagues would need to carry an even number of teams" is confusing, it sounds like the AL and NL would need the to have the SAME number of teams as the other, which they already had at 15 apiece. Does anyone agree? And if so, is changing it to "each league would need to carry an even number of teams" any clearer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)

National League move
Regarding my edit here, there is an on-going discussion at my talk page. In general, this section opines using weasel words. If these concerns are valid, they should be presented as encyclopedic facts with citations to reliable sources expressing such concerns, not just innuendos. --MichaelZimmer (talk) 22:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Hopefully it looks better at least my part of it. Smith03 23:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I see little encyclopedic utility in this statement: "MLB had other options besided moving the Brewers to the National League. MLB could have put both Arizona and Tampa Bay in one league or moved a National League team to the American League." Of course MLB had other options. They had 30 options. Mentioning two of them is not informative. We should present what happened, and only present controversy if it existed to such an extent that it was discussed by reliable sources. --MichaelZimmer (talk) 23:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I change it back to your last edit after I realized you had made some changes so it is better than it was when I first saw it . I do however think that "MLB had other options besided moving the Brewers to the National League. MLB could have put both Arizona and Tampa Bay in one league or moved a National League team to the American League." is encyclopedic because it puts out that MLB had more options than just moving an AL team, when I first read the article today the way it was wrtitten it  the article impleaded that the only option was to move an AL team to the NL. It is also certainly reasonable to point out or remind readers that Selig both owned the Brewers at this time and was the commissioner that is a fact. No problem letting readers draw their own conclusions from that. Sorry if you feel that I am attacking your team or your work on the article but it certainly is reasonable to raise points about motives behind way this team was moved to the NL (yes it needs to be sourced) yes baseball had 30 options so why did they pick this one?Smith03 23:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You're not "attacking my team or my work on the article" - no one owns anything around here. Just trying to ensure encyclopedic quality. Cheers. --MichaelZimmer (talk) 01:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Current Season Results?
I am very hesitant about having 2007 listed in the season-by-season results, requiring daily maintenance. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Shouldn't we let the dust settle? --Chancemichaels 01:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Chancemichaels
 * Agreed, and for that matter, the blow-by-blow account of the 2006 is far too detailed in comparison to other years. In my opinion, the article should focus on events of historical significance that someone reading in ten years would likely care about. As for the 2007 record, there's no real stopping dedicated fans from doing what they will. --Beaker342 02:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure there is - we reach a consensus here, and editors will honor it. I think your criteria is a solid one, if we can get a few more people to chime in then we can apply it to the article.  --Chancemichaels 16:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Chancemichaels
 * Maybe I just don't see the harm in the record changing every day. What would a consensus look like? You can't enter the 2007 record until October? I don't see it working, though I'd go either way. I think the ten year criteria, though I just pulled it out of thin air, is actually a Wikipedia guideline WP:RECENT. Thus, events like the bullpen blowing a game in the 2006 season don't matter. If it was game 7 of the NLCS, it would be a different story. As for the 2006 season summary, I'll say this, it's a lot better than some of the garbage on other team articles. For example, take a look at the disaster that is the Toronto Blue Jays. --Beaker342 16:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You're right - that's a mess. As for this page, I don't know exactly what we need for a consensus, but we can wait and see.  As for changing it every day, that's contrary to Wikipedia policy - this site isn't a place for current news.  I don't think the 2007 season record should be included until it is complete.  --Chancemichaels 20:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Chancemichaels

Throwback
The Throwback uniform has been included, which is good. I, however, am not sure where to find out what teams use throwback uniforms and which do not, as well as which throwback is used. I know the Nationals wear the old "Grays" uniforms as well. Is this practice just among these two teams, or can someone tell me where to find what they wear, or give me a good list with an inclusion of what it looks like so I can pick which one off the MLB shop site is used. Silent Wind of Doom 17:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, there are regular throwbacks, and then there are one-offs (like the Milwaukee Braves and Milwaukee Bears uniforms this team wears). I think the regular alternates should be included in the box, while one-offs should be excluded - though mentioned in the text if warranted on a case-by-case basis.  As to the complete list, MLB does have a comprehensive list of approved uniforms, but I don't believe it is made public any more.  --Chancemichaels 14:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Chancemichaels

untuckem
I too agree the untucking of the jerseys should be mentioned. It is something Wisconsin can be proud of, something similar to the Lambeau Leap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.187.80.4 (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Turn of the century Minor League Brewers ?
Was just reading a white sox history book and it mentioned Connie Mack managing the Milwaukee Brewers. Went to look it up on wikipedia and see no mention of this. Would be nice to know more about it ...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.227.181.181 (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Unifrom Image
On the Unifroms Image, The pants with the Navy Blue Milwaukee Jersey should be Grey not White. That Uniform combo is for wearing on the road only not at home. Please change White to Grey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.230.215.172 (talk) 19:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Nationality of Players
Given the fact that baseball is becoming an increasingly more international sport (i.e., more non-U.S. leagues in existence, more non-U.S. players in the MLB), the roster formatting on Wikipedia should probably be updated to reflect that. If you look at the formatting for other international sports (such as soccer), the player nationalities are indicated using flag icons. I think this would be a beneficial update to each of the major league rosters in the MLB, it would not be too difficult to implement and it would not clutter the information on the page. However, before such change a change is implemented, I thought it would be healthy to achieve at least some form of consensus on the talk page for each team. yuristache (talk) 01:10, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree that it is a good idea to do since other sports with players from many different countries use that format. I think it would be best to decide for all MLB teams though, and not on a team-by-team basis.  Miles Blues  (talk · contribs) 22:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Merge Proposal
I propose that Seattle Pilots be merged into Milwaukee Brewers. There appears to be precedence to have teams who have moved cities and changed names, to be merged into a single article. Some examples are Washington Senators (1901-1960), St. Louis Browns, Brooklyn Robins, and Washington Senators (1961-1971), which are teams that have moved cities and changed their names. Boston Braves (baseball), Brooklyn Dodgers, New York Giants (NL), and Philadelphia Athletics are examples of teams who moved cities, but kept their names.--Jojhutton (talk) 00:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Support - As the proposer, there is clear precedent to not have separate articles for what are clearly the same team. (See Examples above). Its redundant and the two teams share the same history and records. There is no reason to have separate articles.--Jojhutton (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose per many of my arguments at the numerous merge proposals on Talk:Montreal Expos. Split articles is preferable, as previous incarnations of franchises deserve greater coverage.  WP:NOTPAPER, etc., etc. Resolute 01:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Support.. no reason for one season of this teams existence to have a separate page from the rest of the history of the team. Spanneraol (talk) 02:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Given no less than three books have been written about this team, I would say there is ample notability independent of the Milwaukee Brewers such as to justify a stand alone article. Resolute 02:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose per Resolute. With that many RS on this team makes it notable in it's own right. Also in the Talk:Washington_Nationals Resolute indicated he would be willing to turn this into a good article, I think that he should be taken up on that offer. A minor paragraph can then be made on the Brewers page with a main article heading, which would improve the encyclopedia as a whole.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 06:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Of course this article does not currently cite ANY sources.. and is really a poorly constructed article. It's still only ONE season and can easily (and is) covered within the Brewers article. Spanneraol (talk) 16:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * So that would be a support?--Jojhutton (talk) 16:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose, the article should be moved to History of the Seattle Pilots & Seattle Pilots made into a re-direct to that History article. See History of the Brooklyn Dodgers & History of the New York Giants (NL) articles. GoodDay (talk) 16:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Not really a whole lot of history there. Only one season. And there is already a the 1969 Seattle Pilots season. This info could be merged into that article as well, which may actually be abetter idea.--Jojhutton (talk) 16:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Exceptions upset consistancy. GoodDay (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * To be fair, there's no History of the Philadelphia Athletics, History of the St. Louis Browns, or History of the Washington Senators. All teams with long histories, although I suppose there's nothing stopping anyone from creating them.--Jojhutton (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Give it time, as I'm confident my proposal will take hold across the MLB articles. GoodDay (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well I hope so and I would be in favor of those articles based on consistency across the Baseball wikiproject, but the "Pilots" page would be redundant as it was only one season and there is already a page that covers that season.--Jojhutton (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you are right.. this information can easily be merged into the pilots season page... No reason at all to have two separate articles on the same season. Spanneraol (talk) 17:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * In this specific case, there definitely is merit to the idea of redirecting to 1969 Seattle Pilots season. Personally, I would like to see it go the other way, as with books written about the team, the context of the Pilots extends beyond just the season.  But it is certianly true that only one article needs to exist, so no opposition to merging to the season article if that is what consensus holds. Resolute 17:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Good, I agree. In fact perhaps this could be repropsed to that effect, since I didn't even think about it until after this discussion began.--Jojhutton (talk) 17:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose. I like the idea of re-naming Seattle Pilots as "History of the Seattle Pilots" and then re-directing "Seattle Pilots" to "History of the Seattle Pilots". I don't like the idea of merging Seattle Pilots with 1969 Seattle Pilots season. The two articles cover two different perspectives. On one hand, "1969 Seattle Pilots season" discusses one season (albeit the first season) of a baseball team. "History of the Seattle Pilots", on the other hand, would be (is) about an MLB franchise in its first incarnation (location). On a related note, I just looked at History of the Milwaukee Brewers. Its section on the franchise's first season, in Seattle—entitled 1969–70: Roots in Seattle—is written from the perspective of Milwaukee, i.e., not from a Seattle (or neutral) perspective. Eagle4000 (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose and the WP:COMMONNAME is Seattle Pilots. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * Oppose per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and WP:NOTPAPER. -DJSasso (talk) 12:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Support per the simple fact that the pilots only played one unforgettable season before moving to Milwaukee. It hardly seems they need their own separate article when we don't afford other much more notable prior franchise incarnations (Washington Senators, NY Giants, Brooklyn Dodgers, etc...) of teams to have their own articles. Gateman1997 (talk) 22:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * We basically do. See History of the New York Giants (NL) and Brooklyn Dodgers. -DJSasso (talk) 22:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Of Course they already have their own article, the season article.. the issue is if they need TWO separate articles for a team that lasted only one year? Spanneraol (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * If anything I would move the season article into the Pilots article... -DJSasso (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Why on earth would you do that?? Then they would be the only team season in major baseball history to not have a season article. Spanneraol (talk) 22:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It would have a season article, it would be in the Pilots article. Again names of articles are supposed to be the most concise appropriate title. It is much more appropriate to call the article Seattle Pilots than to call it the 1969 Seattle Pilots season. Anyway you would just redirect the other name to the article. And everything would be fine. This is no different than the practice of linking List articles to a section of another page for teams where the list isn't very big yet. -DJSasso (talk) 22:54, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Then we should do the same for the Pilots. Or incorporate it into the Brewers article. The Pilots themselves do not need a stand alone article... Gateman1997 (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes they do. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

Revised Merge Proposal
Propose that Seattle Pilots be merged to 1969 Seattle Pilots season for reasons of common sense. The Brewers article has enough on the Pilots and it would be quite easy to merge the other two articles. Spanneraol (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There is enough material here for a standalone article. No point in merging that. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

 * Oppose, this article should be RM'd to History of the Seattle Pilots. GoodDay (talk) 06:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If season articles are essentially spinout articles from the team article, then in the case of the Pilots, it may be more logical for a consolidation or reverse-split to bring the season article into the team article. isaacl (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Support - There is no reason to have two articles covering the same topic. If there would be no reason to have History of the Seattle Pilots, since the small bit of information is already covered in the Brewers article, as their history is the same.--Jojhutton (talk) 20:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Uh, this conversation belongs on Talk:Seattle Pilots, not here. IMHO, the season information is long enough and full of tables that would overwhelm the existing article. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * ECed on the exact same question: Why is this new merge proposal being held at an irrelevant article? It should be discussed at either Seattle Pilots or 1969 Seattle Pilots season.   In either case, my preference is to merge the season article into the Seattle Pilots article, but would accept the reverse.  "History of..." is just a ridiculous and pointless name suggestion in this case. Resolute 20:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually the season articles need to stay as they are consistent with every team across evert sport.--Jojhutton (talk) 21:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no rule that every name of every article has to be consistent. All that matters is that the season information is covered. And it would be if it was merged in the Seattle Pilots article. This sort of thing is done often for things like Lists of Coaches or the like when the list is too small to be its own article, they are just redirected to the main article section that covers it. This would be no different. -DJSasso (talk) 14:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I'm just making a point that a merge of 1969 Seattle Pilots season into Seattle Pilots, would not go down well with the Baseball wikiproject and would be inconsistent with every other professional team in just about every sport. Would seem odd that this teams season wouldn't have a season article.--Jojhutton (talk) 23:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * But it would have a season article is my point....that is where that argument falls down. The season article would be the Seattle Pilots article. -DJSasso (talk) 01:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * But that season article would differ from all the other existing articles.. making an exception in this case is just silly. Spanneraol (talk) 03:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup
Let me start by saying that the effort put into the Brewers wiki page is outstanding, and it has a lot of information about the team. However, as I look back on what the Brewers wiki page used to be and look ahead 10 years from now I become a bit concerned. As it is now, I feel like the Brewers wiki page is extremely long and cluttered and contains a lot of somewhat sensational information. There are era and season by season breakdowns that I just don't feel at this time belong on the page. Is there going to season breakdown every year that gets tacked onto the Brewers main page?

After 10 years time of adding season breakdowns the Brewers wiki page is going to become atrocious looking. To be honest this wiki page looks more like a fan page injected with fandom and opinion than a wiki page that contains relevant, factual information. I know that there is a synopsis of each season, which I think is meant to shorten the length of the main article with more information available through the links, but I do not feel the synopses even belong on the main page. There should just be a link to a Brewers era and season breakdown wiki page page that contains all that information. Either there needs to be a completely separate page or the information that is there needs to be condensed even more than it is now. I think we need to make a change now to really clean up this wiki page. The season breakdowns are great and despite how it may have come across, I think they should continue to be done, but I do not feel like it belongs on the main page.

Team history most certainly belongs on the main page, but season to season breakdowns don't. I suggest that we stick to only including major team milestones or historical information. Things like the 2004–present: Attanasio era section need to go or be greatly summarized.

I hope we can open some dialogue on this and implement some of these proposed changes or come to some sort of compromise to consider the future of this Brewers wiki page if we continue on the road we are on.

Capitalization of colour names in team infoboxes
Regarding this edit: I have started a discussion on the talk page for WikiProject Baseball regarding the capitalization. Please provide your feedback in that thread. Thanks! isaacl (talk) 03:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Bud Selig's retired #1 image
In the retired numbers section, the retired #1 image in honor of Bud Selig is missing.

Megacheez 05:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

New Logo for 2018 Season
Milwaukee has changed their primary logo to the one found on their hats. Their current one has now been relegated to their secondary logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.247.37 (talk) 17:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

 * Just so we have a source on it, since sportslogos.net doesn't qualify, ESPN's uniform column has confirmed it. SixFourThree (talk) 14:30, 27 March 2018 (UTC)SixFourThree

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Cap Logo.png
 * Main-logo brewers.png

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Milwaukee Brewers cap logo on navy.png

title: Talk:Milwaukee Brewers


text: Category:962 deaths

title: Category:962 deaths


text:
Talk:Personal Response System

I think something similar to this is also used on game shows for voting such as "ask the audience" on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?. I don't know much about those, but I think they are wired instead of infrared. It would be great if someone could add info about the gameshow systems to this article. SCEhardt 03:09, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Personal Response System


text:
Talk:Sergius of Radonezh

Not a Roman Catholic saint
Sergius may be revered amongst some Byzantine or Eastern Catholics. He is not, however, revered in the Roman Church. Neither of his feast days occurs either in the General Roman Calendar or in the Roman Martyrology. Just because you can point to some site purporting to show "Catholic" saints means little. Please, correct this! Mwidunn (talk) 14:40, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

 * Sergius is listed in the 2004 version of the Roman Martyrology. CosmicLycanroc (talk) 21:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Sergii
Could Saint Sergius be referring to Sergii Radonezhsky?
 * No way. Mikkalai 03:22, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Fame
Some mention of his fame with regards to Hesychasm should be made.
 * (source) Sergius gained fame as an exponent of an interior, ascetic style of monastic life, what the Byzantine spiritual masters termed 'hesychasm', the silent prayer of the heart of the recluse.

Name
I think the english translation of his original name would be "Bartholomew". -- Sy / (talk) 03:13, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * One should be careful witth translations of names. We don't call Pierre Curie Peter, do we? Anyway, I added the mentioning of Bart into the article, thanks. Mikkalai 03:27, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Pierre Curie is not known in English academic work as "Peter"; however, most Enlgish-language works refer to the subject of this page as "Sergius of Radonezh". MishaPan 15:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Yet, we do refer in English to Peter Tchaikovsky, don't we? Mwidunn (talk) 14:43, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Sergius of Radonezh image orientation correction
The icon of Sergius of Radonezh is inverted left to right... note 1) the text of the manuscript he is holding, 2) the direction of the lower cross bar of the crosses on his robes, and the use of the "left" hand to make the sign the blessing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.132.28.80 (talk) 15:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Sergius of Radonezh


text:
List of Carleton University people

This is a list of notable people associated with Carleton University, such as faculty members and alumni.

Chancellors

 * 1952–1954 Harry Stevenson Southam
 * 1954–1968 Jack Mackenzie
 * 1969–1972 Lester B. Pearson
 * 1973–1980 Gerhard Herzberg
 * 1980–1990 Robert Gordon Robertson (Emeritus 1992–)
 * 1990–1992 Pauline Jewett
 * 1993–2002 Arthur Kroeger (Emeritus 2002–2008)
 * 2002 Ray Hnatyshyn
 * 2003–2008 Marc Garneau
 * 2008–2011 Herb Gray
 * 2011–2017 Charles Chi
 * 2018– Yaprak Baltacioğlu

Presidents

 * 1942–1947 Henry Marshall Tory
 * 1947–1955 Murdoch Maxwell MacOdrum
 * 1955–1956 James Alexander Gibson (pro tempore)
 * 1956–1958 Claude Bissell
 * 1958–1972 Davidson Dunton
 * 1972–1978 Michael Kelway Oliver
 * 1979 James Downey (pro tempore) 1 January – 15 May
 * 1979–1989 William Edwin Beckel
 * 1989–1996 Robin Hugh Farquhar
 * 1996–2005 Richard J. Van Loon
 * 2005–2006 David W. Atkinson
 * 2006–2008 Samy Mahmoud (pro tempore), from 20 November 2006
 * 2008–2017 Roseann Runte
 * 2017–2018 Alastair Summerlee (interim)
 * 2018–2023 Benoit-Antoine Bacon
 * 2023–current Jerry Tomberlin (interim)
 * Jan. 1, 2025 Wisdom Tettey

Chairs of the Board of Governors

 * 1942–1949 Philip D. Ross, Honorary Chairman
 * 1942–1947 Henry Marshall Tory
 * 1947–1952 Harry Stevenson Southam
 * 1952–1960 J.E. Coyne
 * 1960–1962 E.W. Richard Steacie
 * 1962–1965 C.C. Gibson
 * 1965–1972 David A. Golden
 * 1972–1974 James Lorne Gray
 * 1974–1976 Russ J. Neill
 * 1976–1978 Hyman Soloway
 * 1978–1980 George A. Fierheller
 * 1980–1982 Denis A. Ross
 * 1982–1984 Clifford Thomas Kelley
 * 1984–1985 Jean Teron
 * 1985–1987 Claude Edwards
 * 1987–1989 Ross Cruikshank
 * 1990–1992 Donald Yeomans
 * 1992–1993 Sam Hughes
 * 1993–1995 Maureen O'Neil
 * 1995–1997 Ivan Fellegi
 * 1997–2000 Robert Laughton
 * 2000–2002 Allen Lumsden
 * 2002–2005 Jocelyn Ghent Mallett
 * 2005–2006 Margaret Bloodworth
 * 2006–2008 David M. Dunn
 * 2008–2010 Jacques Shore
 * 2010–2012 Gisele Samson-Verreault
 * 2012–2014 Ronald Jackson
 * 2014–2016 Anthony (Tony) Tattersfield
 * 2016–2018 Christopher Carruthers
 * 2018–2020 Nik Nanos
 * 2020–2022 Dan Fortin
 * 2022–current Greg Farrell

Academics

 * Emma Anderson, professor at University of Ottawa
 * Aslam Anis, professor of health economics at the UBC Faculty of Medicine
 * Andrew Brook, Chancellor's Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science
 * Madhu Dikshit, cardiovascular biologist and N-Bios laureate
 * Ivan Fellegi, former Chief Statistician of Canada
 * Peter Grünberg, Nobel laureate in Physics 2007
 * Erin Johnson, professor of theoretical chemistry at Dalhousie University
 * Lawrence M. Krauss, physics professor at Arizona State University and popular science author
 * Michael I. Krauss, professor at George Mason University School of Law
 * Randal Marlin, Carleton philosophy professor specializing in the study of propaganda
 * Robin Neill, economic historian
 * Ryan North, writer and computer scientist
 * Norm O'Reilly, professor at University of Guelph
 * John Porter, former professor of sociology
 * Edwin G. Pulleyblank, professor at the University of British Columbia
 * Kenneth B. Storey, current professor of biology
 * Lyal S. Sunga, expert in international human rights, humanitarian law and international criminal law
 * William Sweet, professor of philosophy, Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada

Entertainers

 * Melody Anderson, retired actress, social worker
 * Jeremy Gara, band drummer of Arcade Fire
 * Elizabeth Hanna, undergraduate major in philosophy and later graduate of the National Theatre School of Canada; voice actor and speech-language pathologist
 * Mervyn G.H. Hinds, Chicago blues musician, known as Harmonica Hinds
 * K-OS (Kheaven Brereton), musician
 * Kayhan Kalhor, Grammy award–winning musician
 * Norm Macdonald, comedian, actor
 * Mia Martina, pop singer, bestselling author
 * Hamza Haq, actor

Entrepreneurs

 * Suhayya Abu-Hakima, co-founder and CEO of AmikaNow! and Amika Mobile Corporation
 * David Azrieli, architect, 10th richest man in Canada
 * Conrad Black, former businessman
 * Trevor Matthews, founder and CEO of Brookstreet Pictures
 * Eric Sprott, founder of Sprott Asset Management
 * Shane Smith, co-founder and CEO of Vice
 * Jamie Salter, founder and CEO of Authentic Brands Group

Journalists

 * Rosemary Barton, political journalist and host of Power & Politics on CBC News Network
 * Keith Boag, chief political correspondent for CBC News
 * Rita Celli, host for Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
 * Andrew Chang, television journalist
 * Petronila Cleto, Filipino journalist, film critic and social activist
 * James Duthie, TSN host and Journalist
 * Matthew Fraser, former Editor-in-Chief of National Post
 * Edward Greenspon, former Editor-in-Chief of The Globe and Mail
 * Greg Ip, economic journalist, The Wall Street Journal
 * Peter Jennings, journalist and news anchor for ABC News, two-time Peabody Award winner, awarded a Litterarum doctor, honoris causa in 1997
 * Arthur Kent, Emmy award–winning war correspondent
 * Carolyn Mackenzie, broadcaster
 * Robert MacNeil, journalist, Officer of the Order of Canada
 * Sheila MacVicar, Emmy and Peabody Award–winning journalist
 * Gavin McInnes, writer, founder of Vice
 * Nahlah Ayed, Middle East correspondent for the CBC
 * Paul Watson, Pulitzer Prize–winning photojournalist

Politicians

 * Lester Bowles Pearson, former chancellor, professor, Prime Minister of Canada, Nobel Peace Prize laureate
 * Gary Anandasangaree, Member of Parliament, Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations
 * Niki Ashton, Member of Parliament, New Democratic Party leadership candidate
 * Lindsay Blackett, first black Cabinet minister in Alberta
 * Patrick Boyer, Member of Parliament
 * Marco Mendicino, Member of Parliament, former Minister of Public Safety
 * Ben Carr, Member of Parliament
 * Gord Brown, Member of Parliament
 * Mike Colle, Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Alex Cullen, Member of Provincial Parliament, Ottawa City Councillor
 * Hans Daigeler, Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Barry Devolin, former Member of Parliament
 * Paul Dewar, former Member of Parliament
 * Ward P.D. Elcock, Deputy Minister of Defence, former Director of Canadian Security Intelligence Service
 * Catherine Fife, Member of Provincial Parliament, President of the Ontario Public School Boards Association
 * Rob Ford, former Mayor of the City of Toronto, studied political science for a year
 * Larisa Galadza, Canadian Ambassador to Ukraine
 * Evelyn Gigantes, Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Pauline Jewett, Member of Parliament, professor and Chancellor of Carleton University
 * Leo Jordan, Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Wilbert Keon, Senator, heart surgeon
 * Catherine Kitts, Ottawa City Councillor
 * Branden Leslie, Member of Parliament
 * John Manley, former Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister of Canada
 * John Milloy Member of Provincial Parliament, Minister
 * Claudia Mo, Member of Hong Kong Legislative Council
 * John Nater, Member of Parliament
 * Yasir Naqvi, Member of Parliament, former Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Tom Nevakshonoff, Member of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba
 * Paul Okalik, former premier of Nunavut
 * Ernie Parsons, Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Michael Prue, Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Scott Reid, Member of Parliament
 * Omar Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke, former Prime Minister of Somalia
 * Norm Sterling, Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Marit Stiles (born 1969), Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Jenna Sudds, Member of Parliament, Minister of Families, Children, and Social Development
 * Barbara Sullivan, Member of Provincial Parliament
 * Judy Wasylycia-Leis, former Member of Parliament
 * Jim Watson, Member of Provincial Parliament, Mayor and City Councillor of Ottawa
 * Omar Zakhilwal, former Professor of Economics, Afghan Finance Minister and Chief Economic Advisor to the President of Afghanistan
 * Abdul Momin Ismail, former Chief Minister of Brunei and member of the Legislative Council

Sportspeople

 * Derek Holmes, IIHF Hall of Fame inductee
 * Waneek Horn-Miller, Olympian and activist
 * Linda Thom, Olympic gold medal-winning shooter
 * Brian Wilks (born 1966), NHL hockey player

Writers

 * Shirley Barrie, playwright
 * Chris Bailey, writer and productivity consultant
 * Daniel Francis, writer and historian
 * Sara Gruen, fiction author known best for award-winning novel Water for Elephants
 * J.J. McAvoy, writer
 * Peter Worthington, Editor-in-Chief of the Toronto Sun

Others

 * Ngaire Blankenberg, former director of the National Museum of African Art
 * Louise Charron, Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada
 * Tong Daochi, former secretary of the Chinese Communist Party of Sanya Committee
 * Lorna deBlicquy, pioneering woman aviator
 * Michelle Douglas, human rights activist
 * Lorne Elias, inventor of the explosives vapour detector EVD-1
 * Allan Gregg, pollster, political pundit
 * Gregory Henriquez, architect, Governor-General's Medal for Architecture
 * Abdul Rahman Jabarah, alleged al-Qaeda member killed in 2003
 * Jim Judd, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service
 * Warren Kinsella, lawyer, author, musician, political consultant, lobbyist and commentator
 * Chalmers Jack Mackenzie, former chancellor, first president of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited
 * Kenneth Chan Kai-tai, Hong Kong actor and television host for Cable TV Hong Kong channel
 * Karim Rashid, industrial designer
 * Amy Miller, filmmaker
 * Michelle Mohabeer, filmmaker
 * Howard Nuk, industrial designer (former VP of Design at Samsung and Co-founder at Palm)
 * Cristine Rotenberg, crime statistics analyst and nail art YouTube personality
 * Wayne Smith, Chief Statistician of Statistics Canada
 * Harley Swedler, architect
 * Katie Tallo, filmmaker and writer
 * Susan Wood, Canadian literature scholar, pioneer of feminist science fiction studies
 * James K. Wright, Canadian composer, pianist, and musicologist

Notable honorary degree recipients

 * Daniel Alfredsson, former Ottawa Senators captain
 * Murray Sinclair, Chairman of the Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission (2009–2015), awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2015
 * Robert Thirsk, Canadian astronaut and engineer; awarded D.Eng., honoris causa in 2019
 * Paul Martin, 21st Prime Minister of Canada (2003–2006); awarded Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2019
 * Dag Hammarskjöld, United Nations Secretary-General (1953–1961), Nobel Peace Prize laureate; awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 1954
 * U Thant, United Nations Secretary-General (1961–1971); awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 1962
 * Kurt Waldheim, United Nations Secretary-General (1972–1981); awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 1972
 * Tommy Douglas, 7th Premier of Saskatchewan; led the first socialist government in North America and introduced universal public health care to Canada; awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 1980
 * Javier Pérez de Cuéllar, United Nations Secretary-General (1982–1992); awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 1985
 * Mikhail Gorbachev, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union; awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 1993
 * Boutros Boutros-Ghali, United Nations Secretary-General (1992–1997); awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 1995
 * Romano Prodi, 79th Prime Minister of Italy; awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2001
 * Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary-General (1997–2007), Nobel Peace Prize laureate; awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2004
 * Michaëlle Jean, Governor General of Canada (2005–2010); awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2012
 * David Johnston, Governor General of Canada (2010–2017); awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2016
 * Peter Mansbridge, Canadian Broadcaster; awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2014
 * Tomson Highway, Indigenous playwright and novelist; awarded Doctor of Fine Arts, honoris causa in 2013
 * Muhammad Yunus, Bangladeshi social entrepreneur, banker, economist and civil society leader; awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2010
 * Herman Van Rompuy, 49th Prime Minister of Belgium (2008–2009) and then as the first permanent President of the European Council (2009–2014); awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2017
 * Helen Clark, 37th Prime Minister of New Zealand (1999–2008) and Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme (2009–2017); awarded a Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2012
 * Sheilah L. Martin, Canadian Judge, awarded Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2021
 * Buffy Ste-Marie, Indigenous musician; awarded Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2008
 * André Picard, Canadian journalist; awarded Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2017
 * Wanda Thomas Bernard; Canadian Senator; awarded Legum Doctor, honoris causa in 2021

title: List of Carleton University people


text:
Trendelenburg position

In the Trendelenburg position, the body is lain supine, or flat on the back on a 15–30 degree incline with the feet elevated above the head. The reverse Trendelenburg position, similarly, places the body supine on an incline but with the head now being elevated.

The Trendelenburg position is used in surgery, especially of the abdomen and genitourinary system. It allows better access to the pelvic organs as gravity pulls the intra-abdominal organs away from the pelvis. Evidence does not support its use in hypovolaemic shock, with concerns for negative effects on the lungs and brain.

The position was named for the German surgeon Friedrich Trendelenburg (1844–1924).

Current uses

 * The Trendelenburg position can be used to treat a venous air embolism by placing the right ventricular outflow tract inferior to the right ventricular cavity, causing the air to migrate superiorly into a position within the right ventricle from which air is less likely to embolise.

Most recently, the reverse Trendelenburg position has been used in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, also known as MIGS. This position is commonly used for a superior sitting surgeon that uses a combination of downward patient tilt, of approximately 30 to 35 degrees, microscope tilt towards themselves at the same angle and an intraoperative goniolens or prisms that allows them to visualise the inferior trabecular meshwork. Some joysticking of the globe may be required with an appropriate goniolens to bring the meshwork into view.
 * The Trendelenburg position along with the Valsalva maneuver, termed as modified-Valsalva maneuver, can also be used for the cardioversion of supraventricular tachycardia.
 * The Trendelenburg position is helpful in surgical reduction of an abdominal hernia.
 * The Trendelenburg position is also used when placing a central venous catheter in the internal jugular or subclavian vein. The Trendelenburg position uses gravity to assist in the filling and distension of the upper central veins, as well as the external jugular vein. It plays no role in the placement of a femoral central venous catheter.
 * The Trendelenburg position can also be used in respiratory patients to create better perfusion.
 * The Trendelenburg position has occasionally been used to produce symptomatic relief from septum posticum cysts of the subarachnoid space in the spinal cord, but does not bring about any long-term benefits.
 * The Trendelenburg position may be used for drainage images during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
 * The Trendelenburg position is reasonable in those with a cord prolapse who are unable to achieve a knee-to-chest position. It is a temporary measure until a cesarean section can be performed.
 * If a patient in a Fowler's position or semi fowlers position has sunk too far down into the bed, they may temporarily be put in a Trendelenburg position while staff reposition them. This does not have a direct therapeutic action but rather provides a mechanical advantage

Controversial uses

 * People with hypotension (low blood pressure) have historically been placed in the Trendelenburg position in hopes of increasing blood flow to the brain. A 2005 review found the "Literature on the position was scarce, lacked strength, and seemed to be guided by 'expert opinion.'" A 2008 meta-analysis found adverse consequences to the use of the Trendelenburg position and recommended it be avoided. However, the passive leg raising test is a useful clinical guide to fluid resuscitation and can be used for effective autotransfusion. The Trendelenburg position used to be the standard first aid position for shock.
 * The Trendelenburg position can also be used in the treatment of scuba divers with decompression sickness or arterial gas embolism. Many experienced divers still believe this position is appropriate, but current scuba first aid professionals no longer advocate elevating the feet higher than the head. The Trendelenburg position in this case increases regurgitation and airway problems, causes the brain to swell, increases breathing difficulty, and has not been proven to be of any value. "Supine is fine" is a good, general rule for victims of submersion injuries unless they have fluid in the airway or are breathing, in which case they should be positioned in the recovery position.

title: Trendelenburg position


text:
San José de Gracia

San José de Gracia may refer to several places in Mexico:

Aguascalientes

 * San José de Gracia, Aguascalientes
 * San José de Gracia (municipality)

Jalisco

 * San Jose de Gracia, Jalisco

Michoacán

 * San José de Gracia, Michoacán

title: San José de Gracia


text:
Talk:John Hubbard (Maine politician)

Untitled
This article is copied word for word from here: http://history.rays-place.com/governors/me/hubbard-j.htm. Should it be deleted? --Smooth Henry 03:15, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * No, the original source is from 1893, and therefore in the public domain. However, it ought to be credited in the article, which I will do. --Russ Blau (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

I just added that link at the Governor John Hubbard page at my site whare the info was taken from. Ray

title: Talk:John Hubbard (Maine politician)