text:
Unilateral hearing loss

Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) is a type of hearing impairment where there is normal hearing in one ear and impaired hearing in the other ear.

Signs and symptoms
Patients with unilateral hearing loss have difficulty:
 * Hearing conversation on their impaired side
 * Localizing sound
 * Understanding speech in the presence of background noise
 * In interpersonal interaction in social settings
 * Focusing on individual sound sources in large, open environments
 * Heavy impairment of the auditory Figure–ground perception

In quiet conditions, speech discrimination is no worse than normal hearing in those with partial deafness; however, in noisy environments speech discrimination is almost always severe.

The prevalence is 3–8.3% of the population. Individuals who are diagnosed with Single Sided Deafness have difficulties with sound localization and speech in noise discrimination. Children with SSD are more likely to experience developmental delays- school, speech, behavioral problems.

Causes
Known causes include genetics, maternal illness and injury. Examples of these causes are physical trauma, acoustic neuroma, maternal prenatal illness such as measles, labyrinthitis, microtia, meningitis, Ménière's disease, Waardenburg syndrome, mumps (epidemic parotitis),mastoiditis or due to an overstrained nervus vestibulocochlearis after a brain surgery to close to the nerve.

SSD's most severe form of unilateral hearing loss is caused by: sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), acoustic neuroma, anomalies inner ear abnormalities, cochlear nerve deficiency (CND), mumps, congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, meningitis and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) treatment is based on the cause of the hearing loss. Limited treatment when the cause is the Central auditory system or Auditory nerve.

Prevalence
A 1998 study of schoolchildren found that per thousand, 6–12 had some form of unilateral hearing loss and 0–5 had moderate to profound unilateral hearing loss. It was estimated that in 1998 some 391,000 school-aged children in the United States had unilateral hearing loss.

Profound unilateral hearing loss
Profound unilateral hearing loss is a specific type of hearing loss when one ear has no functional hearing ability (91 dB or greater hearing loss). People with profound unilateral hearing loss can only hear in monaural (mono).

Profound unilateral hearing loss or single-sided deafness, SSD, makes hearing comprehension very difficult. With speech and background noise presented at the same level, persons with unilateral deafness were found to listen only about 30–35% of the conversation. A person with SSD needs to make more effort when communicating with others. When a patient can hear from only one ear, and there are limited possibilities to compensate for the disability, e.g., changing listening position, group discussions and dynamic listening situations become difficult. Individuals with profound unilateral hearing loss are often perceived as socially awkward due to constant attempts to maximize hearing leading to socially unique body language and mannerisms.

UHL also negatively affects hearing and comprehension by making it impossible for the patient to determine the direction, distance and movement of sound sources. In an evaluation using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire, SSD results in a greater handicap than subjects with a severe hearing loss in both ears.

Profound SSD is often confused with sensory discrimination disorder (SDD), a type of sensory processing disorder, and can lead to incorrect processing of sensory information or auditory input during interpersonal communications.

Profound unilateral hearing loss is known to cause:
 * Irritability
 * Sound aversion: any presence of noise, no matter how low
 * Body language and mannerisms which appear socially awkward or unusual, like staring at others mouths or tilt the head frequently
 * Frequent headaches, stress
 * Social isolation
 * Chronic interpersonal communication difficulties due to inability of brain to isolate or beam form sounds and voices of other individuals
 * Appearance of anxiousness even in low noise situations
 * Jumpiness
 * Trouble figuring out where sounds are coming from.
 * Variable light dizziness
 * Trouble paying attention to what people are saying: "evasive" behaviour.
 * Misdiagnoses as ADHD
 * Seeming lack of awareness of other people's personal space and moods since brain is hyper-focused on deciphering auditory information in lieu of non-verbal social cues.
 * Lack of sound depth: any background noise (in the room, in the car) is flat and wrongly interpreted by the brain. The effect is similar to what happens when trying to hear someone speaking in a noisy crowd on a mono recording. The effect is also similar to talking on the phone to someone who is in a noisy environment (see also: King-Kopetzky syndrome)
 * Inability to filter out background noise or selectively listen to only the important portion of the noise in the environment.
 * For sensorineural hearing loss, the lack of input coming from the damaged sensory apparatus can cause "ghost beeps" or ringing/tinnitus as the brain attempts to interpret the now missing sensory data. The frequency and the volume of the noise can increase according to one's physical condition (stress, fatigue, etc.). This can aggravate social problems and increase the difficulty of speech comprehension.
 * Talking loudly or "broadcasting": the affected person cannot perceive the volume of their voice relative to other people in the same room or close company, resulting in being characterized by others (who may be located beyond normal auditory range) as domineering or boorish

Treatment
Several hearing devices have been shown to benefit individuals with unilateral hearing loss.

Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) hearing aids are hearing aids that take sound from the ear with poorer hearing and transmit to the ear with better hearing. They consist of a microphone placed near the impaired ear and an amplifier (hearing aid) near the normal ear. The two units are connected either by a wire behind the neck or by wireless transmission. The aid appears as two behind-the-ear hearing aids and is sometimes incorporated into eyeglasses.

Bone Anchored Hearing Aids (BAHAs) are bone conduction devices that are surgically implanted into the mastoid bone, with an abutment protruding through the skin. The external hearing aid clicks onto the abutment and uses bone conduction to transmit sound to the cochlea of the normal hearing ear. The external component can also be attached to a headband or softband and used as a non-surgical device.

The BONEBRIDGE bone conduction implant is surgically implanted into the mastoid bone completely underneath the skin. The audio processor is worn externally and held in place by magnets. It sends sound as electrical signals through the skin to the implant. The implant then sends sound vibrations to the cochlea of the normal hearing ear through the skull via bone conduction.

The ADHEAR bone conduction system is a non-surgical device that sticks to the skin behind the ear. It vibrates to send sound vibrations through the skin and the skull bone to the cochlea of the normal hearing ear.

The SoundBite intraoral bone conduction system used bone conduction via the teeth. One component resembled a conventional behind-the-ear hearing aid that wirelessly connects to a second component worn in the mouth that resembles a conventional dental appliance. The device was discontinued in 2015 and is no longer available.

A cochlear implant can also be used to treat unilateral hearing loss in many countries. The device is surgically implanted in the cochlea of non-hearing ear, with a sound processor worn externally. Using electrical stimulation of the cochlea, sound is sent to the hearing nerve and onto the brain.

Evaluation
According to Snapp 2019, CROS technology solutions provide a noninvasive, aesthetically appealing, low-cost option for individuals with single sided deafness (SSD). The primary benefits of a CROS hearing devices are improved sound awareness from the impaired side and better hearing in noise when speech is located on the impaired side. However, CROS solutions do not provide restoration of binaural hearing and cannot improve tasks requiring binaural input, such as localization.

One study of the BAHA system showed a benefit depending on the patient's transcranial attenuation. Another study showed that sound localization was not improved, but the effect of the head shadow was reduced. The BAHA system has been shown to have higher patient satisfaction and greater perceived benefit by users than the CROS system.

The BONEBRIDGE system has been shown to provide good hearing outcomes, and patients also reported high subjective benefit. The device has been shown to decrease the head shadow effect. Sprinzl et al. (2016) also found that the BONEBRIDGE system had a lower complication rate when compared to other implanted bone conduction devices.

Studies of the ADHEAR system have shown that patients report higher comfort satisfaction and longer daily wearing times compared to the BAHA system with a headband or softband, due to the lack of pressure on the skin. Better outcomes compared to CROS hearing aids have also been reported.

Studies on the SoundBite system showed it to have strong hearing benefit and high patient satisfaction, particularly due to its non-surgical design. Some users reported acoustic feedback from the device.

Cochlear implants (CIs) have been shown to benefit patients with unilateral hearing loss in terms of tinnitus reduction, localization, speech understanding, and quality of life (QoL). The increased ability to locate sounds is explained by the fact that, unlike with the other treatments available, treating unilateral hearing loss with a cochlear implant results in both cochleae being stimulated, which helps the brain to better decipher the location of the sound. However, patients may still have difficulties at frontal locations and on the CI side.

Other Hearing issues
School-age children with unilateral hearing loss tend to have poorer grades and require educational assistance. This is not the case with everyone, however. They can also be perceived to have behavioral issues.

People affected by UHL have great difficulty locating the source of any sound. They may be unable to locate an alarm or a ringing telephone. The swimming game Marco Polo is generally impossible for them.

When wearing stereo headphones, people with unilateral hearing loss can hear only one channel, hence the panning information (volume and time differences between channels) is lost; some instruments may be heard better than others if they are mixed predominantly to one channel, and in extreme cases of sound production, such as complete stereo separation or stereo-switching, only part of the composition can be heard; in games using 3D audio effects, sound may not be perceived appropriately due to coming to the disabled ear. This can be corrected by using settings in the software or hardware—audio player, OS, amplifier or sound source—to adjust balance to one channel (only if the setting downmixes sound from both channels to one), or there may be an option to outright downmix both channels to mono. Such settings may be available via the device or software's accessibility features.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Unilateral hearing loss


text: User talk:163.150.245.8

title: User talk:163.150.245.8


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letterism

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge to Lettrism (Keep 2; Merge/Redirect: 6; Delete: 1) --BM 22:08, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Letterism
This is rubbish. --NewAtair Δ 23:04, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC) Keep art movements. Kappa 00:30, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with and redirect to Lettrism Kappa 10:52, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, this movement continues to have wide influence. --iMb~Mw 01:41, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC) Make that a redirect to Lettrism (& of course save any non-duplicated material). (both spellings are in common use) --iMb~Mw 05:37, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep with cleanup. Spatch 01:55, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Needs cleanup and expansion; definitely an encyclopedic topic. Merge and redirect to Lettrism.  I somehow missed that the first time around despite agreeing that that's the preferred spelling. -- Rbellin|Talk 02:43, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Important movement in art, typology and graphic design. Cnwb 04:52, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Lettrism, which appears to be the same movement and the more common spelling and is already an excellent article. Andrewa 11:13, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, as per Andrewa. Radiant! 11:37, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect, yes, but which spelling? When each is entered into Google by itself, letterism gets more hits, but if you restrict the Google search to art dictionaries, lettrism gets more hits. Having looked at some number of hits, I tend to also favor lettrism, but I would be interested to hear from someone with definitive domain knowledge. HyperZonktalk 17:07, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: That may be hard to come by, see Talk:Lettrism! That talk page is also the page to discuss the alternative names IMO. But both names seem to have significant usage, so for the moment either redirecting to the other is OK IMO. No change of vote. Andrewa 20:00, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Indeed, lettrism would seem to be the way to go, then. Redirects are cheap, etc. HyperZonktalk 02:18, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, cleanup and redirect. Agree with others. --Andylkl 04:17, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Americans for Safe Access

Americans for Safe Access (ASA), based in Washington, D.C., is a member-based organization working to ensure safe and legal access to cannabis for therapeutic uses and research. Americans for Safe Access works in partnership with local, state, and federal legislators in the United States to create policies that improve access to medical cannabis for both patients and researchers. ASA has over 100,000 active members across the United States.

title: Americans for Safe Access


text:
Right-in/right-out

Right-in/right-out (RIRO) and left-in/left-out (LILO) refer to a type of three-way road intersection where turning movements of vehicles are restricted. A RIRO permits only right turns and a LILO permits only left turns. "Right-in" and "left-in" refer to turns from a main road into an intersection (or a driveway or parcel); "right-out" and "left-out" refer to turns from an intersection (or a driveway or parcel) to a main road. RIRO is typical when vehicles drive on the right, and LILO is usual where vehicles drive on the left. This is because minor roads usually connect to the outsides of two-way roads. However, on a divided highway, both RIRO and LILO intersections can occur.

The remainder of this article refers only to RIRO but applies equally to LILO.

A RIRO intersection differs from a 3/4 intersection (right in/right out/left in) and an unrestricted intersection.

Design
RIRO is an important tool of access management, itself an important component of transportation planning. A study applying access management guidelines to the redesign of Missouri Route 763 in Columbia, Missouri illustrates how RIRO, combined with signalized intersections designed to permit U-turns, can accommodate high volumes of traffic with low delay and high safety.

The RIRO restriction typically is enforced through physical barriers such as a traffic island in an intersection to direct vehicles into the permitted turn, and to restrict vehicles from traveling through the intersection. The major road itself often has a median separating the two directions of traffic. The restriction may also be achieved by signage, but when a median or other barrier is not present in the median of the major road, RIRO configurations have been found to result in significant violation rates.

RIRO roads may also have grade-separated interchanges, but vehicles on these roads do not yield the right-of-way to other vehicles entering the roadway, nor encounter cross traffic. Such roads are sometimes called RIRO expressways. In the United States, they are sometimes called Jersey freeways, due to their prevalence in the state of New Jersey, although they are not limited to that state.

Use
RIRO road configurations are an important tool for access management. General types of RIRO road configuration include limited access roads (divided highways, etc.) and roundabouts. To travel in the restricted direction, vehicles must first turn in the permitted direction, then reverse direction in a U-turn, by going around a roundabout or by going left around a block. RIRO is especially useful where left turns would require crossing in front of oncoming vehicles.

Safety
RIRO configurations generally improve road-traffic safety and efficiency by reducing the number of conflict points between vehicles.

A RIRO configuration may improve safety and operations at one intersection while consequently worsening them at another intersection upstream or downstream.

title: Right-in/right-out


text:
User:SilasM/Free Speech Cases

High Court of Australia on Freedom of Political Communication

Nationwide News v Wills

Lange

Langer

title: User:SilasM/Free Speech Cases


text:
Talk:Riparian Plaza

Rewrite
I've made a significant rewrite of the article - the original was rather chaotic, and seemed somewhat less than neutral, with a number of emotive adjectives used. Nick Moss 23:06, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Photo
With that great photo added, the other two were no longer necessary and were making the article too long, so I deleted the links.Iorek85 23:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Number of elevators
I can't find a reference for the number of elevators for the infobox. If you know the number, please add it, or if you have a source, let us know. - Shiftchange (talk) 06:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

 * I'm not saying we can use this as a source, as I'm constantly removing skyscrapercity forum links from references on articles, but this post appears to say it has 8 elevators in total. That doesn't seem like many to me, seeing as most skyscrapers of this height have at least 15-20, that I know of anyway. -- timsdad  (talk) 07:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

 * I have the building plans for Riparian PLaza. It has thirteen lifts in total. They comprise 6x Low rise lifts, 4x High Rise Lifts and 2x Residential lifts. These are all 23 passange cars. There is also 1x Goods lift rated at 2,500kg. There are also 2x carpark lifts however these would not normally be included in the count as they are outside of the core. MyFavco (talk) 03:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Disputed Facts
Timsdad has edited this page so that the Developer is incorrectly listed as Grocon. I have reverted this edit. This simple and obvious fact can be verified with the smallest amount of Research. -MyFavco (talk) 02:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

 * Was that comment even worth starting a discussion about? It's clearly not disputed, I mistakenly reverted more of your edit than I meant to, and for that I am sorry. -- timsdad  (talk) 06:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes, I aplogise for the tone of my comment above, it was little harsh. However, at the time I was rather perplexed that my correction of such an obvious error was reverted so quickly. I can see now how it happened. It is good to see that we have since built upon each others comments to jointly further improve other related pages.MyFavco (talk) 11:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Mast is now counted in height
In keeping with the articles for

Central Park (skyscraper), (perth), 120 Collins Street, (melb), 101 Collins Street, (melb), Bourke Place, (melb) --- communications spires are now included in height of Australian buildings.

(official riparian website also quotes 250m)

communications masts now count as spires if they double as an integral part of the buildings design.

If this is so for buildings like central park perth, and bourke place, it is certainly the central design point for riparian.

http://www.riparianplaza.com.au/Core/Content/AConceptualFirst/Content1254.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saruman-the-white (talk • contribs) 08:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

the spires on rialto towers, and melbourne central tower which are communications masts now also count in height (see list of talles buildings in australia). we will follow this for consistancy.

Saruman-the-white (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Riparian Plaza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720064741/http://www.brookfieldmultiplex.com/construction/projects/property-details/561/Riparian-Plaza to http://www.brookfieldmultiplex.com/construction/projects/property-details/561/Riparian-Plaza
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050104072208/http://propertyweb.com.au/press/pr0278.html to http://propertyweb.com.au/press/pr0278.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211155113/http://www.infolink.com.au/n/Major-Brisbane-development-project-designed-by-Harry-Seidler-n752592 to http://www.infolink.com.au/n/Major-Brisbane-development-project-designed-by-Harry-Seidler-n752592
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121132640/http://www.seidler.net.au/projects/032.html to http://www.seidler.net.au/projects/032.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Riparian Plaza


text:
Talk:Albion, Dane County, Wisconsin

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Albion, Dane County, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Albion, Dane County, Wisconsin


text: Category:Joni Mitchell songs

title: Category:Joni Mitchell songs


text: User talk:66.65.200.159

title: User talk:66.65.200.159


text:
Talk:Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary

Additional comments
In revising this article, I refrained from remarks which might seem opinionated or judgmental, and thus out of place in an encyclopedia. I will use this format for such commentary, as it is informative in important ways that the article is not.

The American College Dictionary (1947), the first Random House dictionary and the basis of the Random House Dictionary, was almost entirely a condensed reformatting of the Century abridgment, The New Century Dictionary (1927), with most of the quotations removed, the etymologies trimmed, illustrations reduced, and appendices slashed. So, apart from the addition of a small percentage of new words, the ACD was an abridgment of the abridgment of the Century Dictionary. Far superior, in my estimation, the New Century was still in print for more than another decade after the ACD was published; yet the ACD was a highly praised "new" dictionary.

The 1st edition of the Random House Dictionary (1966) was actually this college dictionary with gratuitous numbers of proper names added as main entries. This included names of towns and cities of only a few thousand people, institutions, books, kings, etc., and given names: even Jim and Jimmie offered as separate entries and defined as "a boy's given name, form of James," etc. So, it was rather audacious of Random House to call their new dictionary "unabridged", arriving on the heels of Webster's Third (1961) which covered more than three times the number of lexical (ie, generic rather than proper name) entries. RH employed numerous methods of puffing up the book to "unabridged" demensions: larger page and print, thicker paper, and heavier binding. It worked.

The 2nd edition of the RHD (1987) considerably increased the vocabulary over the 1st, although it was still only about half that of Webster's Third. I don't pretend to know how this revision was created, but a comparison with the World Book Dictionary (1963, 1976 rev.) reveals that, apart from newer words, the word lists of the two dictionaries are almost identical, and the definitions in the RHD appear to be slight paraphrases of those in the WBD. Perhaps RHD merely used the same word selection method, but it doesn't seem as if the expansion of the dictionary was as arduous as it might have been.

As i described in the article RHD 2nd edition applied a different method of dating words from that of the originator of the practice, Merriam-Webster in their 1983 Collegiate 9th edition. Quoting myself from the article, "where the Collegiate gave 1676, Random House might offer, 1670-80". Ostensibly, RH was offering a reasonable estimate, as there is no way to pinpoint the actual first use of a word. But how did they arrive at the estimates ? Consider: Either you have a citation or you don't.  If you have one, what is the purpose of an estimate ? You might reason that if there is a citation, the actual first appearance might have been a few years earlier. That would explain the earlier date, but why the later date ? Might the word have originated later than the citation ?

Then comes the adoption by Random House of the name Webster's in addition to their own. Was not Random House enough of a recognizable and respected name, one which distinguished their dictionaries from others ? What would people think if they saw an American Heritage Webster's ? An attempt to gouge some extra market share, it was yet another free ride, symbolizing well RH's derivative and disingenuous method of producing and marketing dictionaries.

My conclusion is that The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, aka The Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, is not all it's cracked up to be. Labelling it "unabridged" is a corruption of the connotation the word has had for over 140 years to represent dictionaries that are in the class of the most comprehensive of a given time. Further, from its conception, it has been derivative of the previous work of others rather than exhaustive original research, making it relatively easy to produce. Even when they adopted another dictionary's innovation (ie, the entry dates) they applied it poorly.

I'm not saying it isn't a useful dictionary. As a large one volume reference, handy for including plentiful proper names in its alphabetical listing, it may be a dictionary that satisfies many people, especially those who aren't concerned about the fine details. My objection is that it has gleaned honors it doesn't deserve. - ERL 216.19.218.36 23:11, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The best American English dictionary
RHU is the best dictionary of American English. Its usage notes are 100% accurate, making sound judgments on thorny linguistic issues. This is especially true of its discrimination between formal and informal, standard and nonstandard.

This has been stated in many newspaper reviews, which are conspicuously absent from this article. When writers with an agenda contribute to Wikipedia, it's not their viewpoint that wins; it's Wikipedia that loses. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.252.197.122 (talk) 02:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC).


text:
Talk:Asbestos strike

Untitled

 * There is a mention in this article that the Archbishop Joseph Charbonneau was asked by the Duplessis government to be transferred but the Church refused. The french article on Joseph Charbonneau says that on the contrary the Church did comply with Duplessis's request and did send the priest to British Columbia in 1950... I Think this should be corrected. Capbat 15:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmm...sounds like the canadian homestead strike.

Should there be some discussion of Ledoux and the appaling health situation caused by the asbestos dust? --Lastexpofan 05:43, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

significance to quiet revolution
I don't get it... if the miner's strike had the sympathy of the catholic church and the general public, what's the connection with the secularization of the quiet revolution? - 70.71.154.237 08:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I think the Church was targeted by Trudeau et als because it protected the culture and ethnicity of the French-Canadians. The lawful Constitution of Canada, established in 1867, also does this by instituting federalism. This gives each of the founding peoples of Canada an exclusive Legislature and the power to make laws to preserve and cause their own culture to flourish. Trudeau, Pelletier and Marchand were in fact Communists who wanted a Soviet-style "pluralist" state; this, of course, conflicts with the ideals of the Constitution, and the 400-year-old practice of the Church in protecting the interests of the French Canadians.

In order to destroy the lawful Constitution of Canada so as to replace it with multiculturalism, also called pluralism, the French Canadians had to be pried loose from the protection of the Church; and then used to vote in referendums to destroy the rest of the country.

The so-called "Quiet Revolution" was literally the overthrow of the Church; and the economic remodelling of Quebec using hydroelectricity -- because the otherwise largely rural culture of French Canadians did not make them look like very convincing candidates for "independence", and Quebec had to be made viable for the sake of appearances in a referendum. It is important to note that in both 1980 and 1995, the question on the referendum ballot had nothing to do with "seceding" -- it sought a "mandate to negotiate" (with the federal government) a new form of government for ALL of Canada -- something close to Trudeau's heart, multiculturalism. This is the literal disenfranchisement of the founding peoples of Canada, who under that new system have no rights at all. Multiculturalism is a kind of ethnic "affirmative action" which seeks to employ, house and integrate foreigners at the expense of the locals, and in preference to them. Public schools in Canada are commandeered to teach the ideologies that underpin multiculturalism. Canadians literally have no public schools to raise their own kids as Canadian. Canadian is not merely a label to GPS you on a map; the Canadians have been here sometimes for 3-400 years, and considered themselves as "peoples". So, to accomplish the overthrow of the Constitution of Canada, Quebec had to be modernized in the Quiet Revolution, groomed and used to blackmail the rest of Canada into abandoning its own rights and existence.

But, it doesn't end there. The goal is to eliminate three national borders in North America and merge Canada, the USA and Mexico, totally mixing the populations and finishing off all three countries and their constitutions, forever. The intent is to govern by "regionalism", which is communism, with regional governance under a world government. Check online for the UNPA, and you'll see they're doing it, they're working on it. That's the petition for an elected assembly at the UN -- a "world government" in which the peoples of the world get a useless vote, and the fascists get to run things.

Have a nice day.

Demands of the miners
I was under the impression that one of the demands of the miners was co-ownership (socialist style) of the mines. Does anyone know?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.226.93 (talk) 03:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Asbestos strike


text: Template:Campaignbox 1876 North Plains Campaign


text:
Talk:Global warming period

(William M. Connolley 23:15, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)) A bit confrontational but I forgive you :-)

 * Hmmm, I don't think this page has much point. Merge/redirect/delete? William M. Connolley 17:35:12, 2005-07-16 (UTC).

This page has a pile of red-links. It introduces "surface water temperature" which doesn't really exist as a concept... though Sea surface temperature does. Its completely sourceless, and probably wrong:

 * AD 0-300 - the Roman Warm Period, when surface water temperature was as warm as the present
 * AD 600-850 - a surface water temperature warming of ~3.0°C
 * the Medieval Warm Period: fluctuations of 0.5-1.0°C until AD 1200
 * AD 1700 to the present, SWT increased by 1.75C (the Modern Warm Period)

Number 1 is dubious and probably unsourcable. If we interpret SWT as just sfc T, and "warm as the present" as 20C avg, then it might be defensible. #2 seems unsupportable. #4 Seems wrong.

William M. Connolley 22:00:19, 2005-07-17 (UTC).

 * Merge/delete global warming period Dragons flight 21:43, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Seconded. Not sure what to merge it into though. Rd232 20:51, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

OK, I'm going to continue my boldness and simply redirect it to GW. As far as I can see it has no content to redirect. William M. Connolley 21:13:22, 2005-07-30 (UTC).

title: Talk:Global warming period


text:
Talk:Zadie Smith

Quotes and External Links
Great quotations, but I feel "quotes" qualify under WP:TRIVIA. I've moved one to wikiquote and the other to the White Teeth page. Also, please include external links about Zadie Smith, not her various novels. I've moved the links about White Teeth and On Beauty to their respective novel pages. --Junius49 (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Works
Great work here. I've merged the short novel descriptions with their respective pages (and I started a page for the Autograph Man, which I'm currently reading). We should probably keep cleaning up the works section. --Junius49 (talk) 15:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Language
As English isn't my mother tongue, I would be happy and thankful if someone would take the time to look over and correct my edits. They should not be too bad, but still...

Paragraphs: Influence, Topics
Till now I didn't manage to put a lot of information into these paragraphs. I will try to complete them, but would be thankful for any help in this.

Novel: White Teeth
I guess we will have to go through the stump on White Teeth one day. Hope to find the time in the near future, but maybe one of you is willing?

Novel: The Autograph Man
Not having read this novel yet, I wasn't really able to add information on it. If some of you find the time it would be nice to have a better description on this site and maybe even a seperate site with more detailed information.

Works in Gerneral
With such a young author, it was quite tiresome to look through all the websites mentioning her name and putting together links to everything she has published. There was no complete list anywhere. There must still be a lot missing and especially a lot to come. Can you help me keep this list updated?

Martha and Hanwell
Browsing throgh amazon, I found the following link: http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0141023120/qid=1109634528/sr=1-9/ref=sr_1_10_9/202-1364067-8327030 Looks like Zadie Smith is about to publish this the next months? Any information? I just know about the plans to publish On Beauty, nevre heard or read about Martha and Hanwell.

Date of birth
Most sources seem to agree on 27 October, but this is quite comprehensive and it says 25 October. I've seen that date elsewhere too. Does anybody know for sure? JackofOz 13:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Vanhorn (talk) 07:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't, but I see the 27 October date more often in my searches just now. (Including Wikiquote) I somehow don't think the Guardian dug out her birth certificate for the infobox at the bottom of this story, so I'm not sure that it's much more authoritative. Today's issue of Writer's Almanac archive copy goes with 27 October, and they're normally pretty thorough.

On Beauty
Am planning to add a page on 'On Beauty' shortly, once I've finished reading 'Howard's End'. Just checking nobody's in the middle of doing the same. Fauxvegan 08:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

 * "...mainly set in London" - On Beauty is not mainly set in London. It is mainly set in a fictional New England town. London does feature, but only for a chapter or two.Cravenmonket 01:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

translating into Chinese Wikipedia
The 22:05, 25 September 2011 Logical Cowboy version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Removed notification
Many reliable sources exist on this article so notification was deleted. OR drohowa (talk) 23:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 11:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment
The Education section seems to be severely lacking in this article; I am concerned with the relevance of some of the information in the section, such as the quote from her as correcting a newspaper assertion. Is there perhaps a source which cites her reception of the double fist or 'third'? Regardless, an overall expansion of the section might be beneficial. Additionally, it seems that some critical citations are missing, particularly concerning her early career aspirations and the consistent mention of Smith's personal feelings. The "in interviews" should also be cited in the second paragraph of the Career section. The article also lists the bibliography as incomplete, but I had trouble finding any works by Smith which were not listed here. Notwithstanding, an update is needed for the last sentence of the Career section - Swing Time has since been published, and some (brief) mention of its critical and popular reception as Smith's most recent book might be worth exploring. Otherwise, the article is unbiased, sources and links work effectively, and all sources seem to be reliable. Dsmith18 (talk) 04:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Dsmith18

Missing Link In Career Section

 * Including a link to a source for Martha and Hanwell would be beneficial. The summary of the content is helpful, but a link to the full text itself would allow readers to do further research instead of relying on just the few sentences given Cooper kat2018 (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Zadie Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519225613/http://www.apwatt.co.uk/ to http://www.apwatt.co.uk/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110830224650/http://themaysxix.tumblr.com/guesteditors to http://themaysxix.tumblr.com/guesteditors
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080523174124/http://www.radcliffe.edu/fellowships/fellows_1004.aspx to http://www.radcliffe.edu/fellowships/fellows_1004.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820070215/http://www.magazine.org/content/Files/Mason.October.pdf to http://www.magazine.org/content/Files/Mason.October.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Oxford or Cambridge?
"...she had translated Chaucer into contemporary English at Oxford" Presumably Cambridge. The NYT may be the source, but is paywalled. Erewhonian (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2024
I would like to add more information to Zadie Smith's personal life. Mckoybrianna1122 (talk) 18:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Jamedeus (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Zadie Smith


text:
Talk:List of mayors of Ottawa

I have de-linked most of the names and the election dates from this article because it is very unlikely that anyone will ever write articles about these people and elections. Having a list full of red links does not benefit Wikipedia. I have left some red links in where it seems possible that articles may be written in the future, i.e., relatively recent winning cnadidates for mayor. What is more likely to happen with red links is that they will turn blue when some writes an article about an American football player or British musician with the same name, and then we'll have a misleading link. Of course, if anyone does write articles about these people, they are likely to come to this page in order to create the links in the first place. Kevintoronto 23:15, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree that failed candidates are not likely to ever have articles, but I do think it is important that past mayors remain linked. It will take awhile, but I'm sure they will all eventually have articles. - SimonP 00:46, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

 * I tend to agree with you here. --Spinboy 02:19, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't see the empty headers pointing to mayors in former municipalities being of much use. Rather they should be listed on the pages of those municipalities. I have already added the one existing list to Osgoode Township, Ontario. Also I don't think a distinction needs to be made between the new and the old city. The city has gone through many amalgamations and the city itself gives out a continuous list. - SimonP 02:35, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

 * If we're not listing it there, then we should at least reference where people can find the former mayors. I didn't realize where you had moved it, you didn't leave it in the notes. --Spinboy 02:39, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I would have added links, but adding a "for a list of mayors in X see here" would be misleading because we do not actually have those lists. Even the Osgoode Township one is only a fragment. - SimonP 03:00, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * It may be fragmented, but a link to it is better than nothing. --Spinboy 03:15, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:List of mayors of Ottawa


text:
Chryso

Chryso (Greek: Χρύσω or Χρυσό) or Chrisso (Greek: Χρισσό) may refer to several places in Greece:

 * Chryso, Evrytania, a village in Evrytania, municipal unit Viniani
 * Chryso, Serres, a village in Serres regional unit, municipal unit Emmanouil Pappas
 * Chrisso, Phocis, a village in Phocis, municipality Delphi
 * Chryso Stamatopoulou (born 1975), Greek singer

title: Chryso


text:
Carlo Buonaparte

Carlo Maria Buonaparte or Charles-Marie Bonaparte (27 March 1746 – 24 February 1785) was an Italian attorney best known as the father of Napoleon Bonaparte and grandfather of Napoleon III.

Buonaparte served briefly as a personal assistant to revolutionary leader Pasquale Paoli, fighting with the Corsican forces against the Genoese republic and later the French invasion. With the island becoming French, Buonaparte eventually rose to become in 1777 Corsica's representative to the court of Louis XVI. Twenty years after his death, his second surviving son, Napoleon, became Emperor of the French. Several of Buonaparte's other children received royal titles from their brother and married into royalty.

Early life
Carlo Buonaparte was born in 1746 in Ajaccio, Corsica, at the time part of the Republic of Genoa; he already had a sister Maria Gertrude, born in 1741, and a brother Sebastiano, born in 1743. His father, Giuseppe Maria Buonaparte had represented Ajaccio at the Council of Corte in 1749. The Corsican Buonapartes were of Tuscan origin. Carlo’s ancestor, Guglielmo di Buonaparte, had been a member of the Ghibelline-controlled municipal council of Florence in the thirteenth century, when the Guelphs faction took over Florence, Guglielmo and his family fled to Sarzana. Guglielmo’s descendant Francesco di Buonaparte, sailed from Liguria to Corsica in the 16th century for a new life.

Carlo initially followed in his father’s footsteps. He studied to be a lawyer at University of Pisa. Still, following a substantial inheritance from his father’s death, he left before earning his degree to tend to his inheritance and take charge of family responsibilities. On 2 June 1764, he married fourteen-year-old Maria Letizia Ramolino: the Ramolinos descended from noble Lombard antecedents and were established in Corsica for 250 years. Their marriage was arranged by their families. Economic convenience was one of several factors considered while arranging the match, the main considerations being cultural compatibility in matters such as speech dialect, church habits, food habits, attire, and other family traditions. Buonaparte’s new wife brought a dowry of thirty-one acres of land, including a mill and bakery, which yielded an annual income of roughly £10,000.

French takeover
For a period after his marriage at Ajaccio on 2/7 June 1764, he worked as a secretary and personal assistant to Pasquale Paoli. He had a son, Napoléon, who died in infancy in 1765, as did a daughter. Paoli sent him to Rome to negotiate with Pope Clement XIII in 1766. He had enjoyed his time in Rome up until being forced for reasons unknown back to Corsica in 1768 – though he had possibly enjoyed an affair with a married woman during his stay, which led to his departure. At the time of his return, the Republic of Genoa had offered Corsica to Louis XV as payment for a debt. The French were eager to obtain the strategically placed island to protect their own coasts, and Genoa was equally keen to relinquish control given their inability to resist growing independence movements. Political upheaval followed as France gained ownership of Corsica, and many of Paoli's supporters had to flee to the mountains. Buonaparte and his family, now boasting newborn Giuseppe, who was the first child to survive infancy, were included. The family eventually returned to the town, where Buonaparte's wife gave birth to a fourth child, Napoleone.

Soon after the French acquisition of the island, Carlo Buonaparte embraced the new government. He was appointed Assessor of the Royal Jurisdiction of Ajaccio and the neighbouring districts on 20 September 1769. Shortly after that, he became a Doctor of Law at the University of Pisa on 27 November 1769.

Rise to prominence
In April 1770, the French administration created a Corsican Order of Nobility. Buonaparte became an advocate of the Superior Council of Corsica on 11 December 1769 and a Substitute Procurator of the King of France in Ajaccio in October 1770. Buonaparte already possessed the title of a "Noble Patrician of Tuscany" (Nobile Patrizio di Toscana) since 1769 by permission of the Archbishop of Pisa due to his ancestry, and had his nobility confirmed on 13 September 1771. He then became the assessor of the Royal Jurisdiction of Ajaccio in February 1771, Deputy of the Nobility in the General States of Corsica on 13 September 1771, Member of the Council of the Twelve Nobles of Dila (Western Corsica) in May 1772, Deputy of the Nobility of Corsica at the Royal French Court in July 1777 and finally he was named Corsica's representative to the Court of Louis XVI of France at Versailles in 1778.

Despite being honoured with many titles, Buonaparte's dissatisfied nature led him to embark on risky business enterprises. He made many claims on land and money through legal means, but his success was limited, and he burned through his finances rapidly. His apparent fondness for gambling worsened his monetary difficulties. Buonaparte noted his situation in his account book: "In Paris, I received 4,000 francs from the King and a fee of 1,000 crowns from the government, but I came back without a penny." By 1782, Buonaparte was growing weak and suffering from constant pain. He travelled to Montpellier to seek proper medical care. Nothing could be done to quell the effects of what was believed to be stomach cancer, the same disease that may have killed his son Napoleon. Buonaparte died on 24 February 1785, and, due to his frivolous spending, left his surviving wife and eight children penniless. Jérôme, his youngest son, was born three months before he died.

Issue
Carlo Buonaparte's marriage to Letizia Ramolino produced thirteen children between 1765 and 1784; five died, two at birth and three in infancy. Eight children survived.

 * unnamed daughter Buonaparte (1765-1765).
 * Maria Anna Buonaparte (3 January 1767 – 1 January 1768).
 * Joseph Bonaparte (7 January 1768 – 28 July 1844) King of Naples and Sicily, King of Spain, and Comte de Survilliers, married on 1 August 1794 Marie Julie Clary.
 * Napoleon Bonaparte (15 August 1769 – 5 May 1821), namesake of his deceased older brother and Emperor of the French, he married on 9 March 1796 Joséphine de Beauharnais and secondly on 2 April 1810 Marie Louise, Archduchess of Austria.
 * Maria Anna Buonaparte (14 July 1771 – 23 November 1771), namesake of her deceased older sisters.
 * A stillborn child (1773)
 * Lucien Bonaparte (21 March 1775 – 29 June 1840), Prince of Canino and Musignano, married on 4 May 1794 to Christine Boyer and secondly on 26 October 1803 to Alexandrine de Bleschamp, widow of Hippolyte Jouberthon, known as "Madame Jouberthon".
 * Maria Anna (Elisa) Bonaparte (3 January 1777 – 7 August 1820), namesake of her deceased older sisters, Grand Duchess of Tuscany, married on 5 May 1797 Felice Pasquale Baciocchi, Prince of Lucca and Piombino.
 * Louis Bonaparte (2 September 1778 – 25 July 1846), King of Holland, and Comte de Saint-Leu, married on 4 January 1802 Hortense de Beauharnais.
 * A stillborn son (1779).
 * Pauline Bonaparte (20 October 1780 – 9 June 1825), Sovereign Princess and Duchess of Guastalla, married 5 May 1797 to Victor-Emmanuel Leclerc and secondly married on 28 August 1803 Camillo Borghese, 6th Prince of Sulmona.
 * Caroline Bonaparte (25 March 1782 – 18 May 1839), Grand Duchess of Berg and Cleves, wife of Joachim Murat, later queen consort of Naples, and Countess of Lipona.
 * Jérôme Bonaparte (15 November 1784 – 24 June 1860), King of Westphalia, Prince of Montfort, married on 24 December 1803 to Elizabeth Patterson, secondly on 22 August 1807 to Princess Katharina of Württemberg and thirdly to Justine Bartolini-Baldelli in 1840 (religious) and 19 February 1853 (civil).

Ancestry
Direct ancestors of Carlo Buonaparte

title: Carlo Buonaparte


text:
Michael Kergin

Michael Kergin (born 26 April 1942) is a Canadian career diplomat, who has been a member of the foreign service in some capacity since 1967, when he joined the Department of External Affairs.

Education and career
Kergin graduated from the University of Trinity College in the University of Toronto in 1965, and received a degree from Magdelen College, Oxford University, in 1967. He served as the 19th Canadian ambassador to the United States of America from 26 October 2000 until 28 February 2005. Previously, he had been the Canadian ambassador to Cuba from 1986 to 1989.

Kergin is currently a senior fellow at the University of Ottawa’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs. Previously, he served as an advisor to Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty on international affairs.

title: Michael Kergin


text: Category:Neil Young songs

title: Category:Neil Young songs


text:
User talk:Zeimusu/images

A thank you note
Thanks for reminding me about the so-called GFDL you put in my Three Shuffles and a Draw images. Basically, I don't know how would I tag picture I took myself. Nanami Kamimura|(talk) 10:59, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

The Humungous Image Tagging Project
Hi. You've helped with the WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Image:Pasdetout.jpeg
I changed it to cc-by-sa, but there's not a whole lot of difference. Thanks for letting me know. - Hephaestos|§ 05:44, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

shodo image
While I have no objection to that image being released under the GFDL, since I created the image it would have been nice if you'd asked before going ahead and putting it there. Exploding Boy 18:33, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

Dimma Image
Thanks for finding the source to this image. As I told Quadell, I have a use for this image in article on my to do write list, and am quite glad to find copyright free. Good work !! Dsmdgold 20:43, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

Adding images
Thank you for the information regarding photos. I knew that I should be doing something extra! But tell me, what do I add the tags and where do I put them? --PassionVine 21:09, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Helo, and Thank you
Please, can you chack now am I apropriate done requested informations on Image:Dusan's_Serbia200.jpg on page Serbia. And Pls. correct my spelling. --Ninam 23:54, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Re: Zelda Images
The images themseles are copyrighted to Nintendo, however they are avaible for third-party use and distibution, which is how I obtained them. I hope this answers your question. Ereinion 00:05, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure I know what you mean... Nintendo has their policy regarding copyrights, trademarks, and intellectual properties published on their company's home page. I could create such a template that you were suggesting if indeed the current templates Wikipedia has are in some way unsuitable. Ereinion

Under U.S. copyright law, partial works are allowed to be used for commentary or teaching. In the case of Nintendo, it wouldn't be practical to give a statement stating that their copyrights are given free license because they still use the intellectual rights, however distribution is still permitted with the acknowledgement that Nintendo owns all rights to its respective works and properties. This is my understanding. You can research this more indepth if you like at the Reproductions of Copyrighted Works by Educators and Librarians section. Ereinion 00:26, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The proposal to re-tag the images is agreed. Ereinion

Image deletion
Greetings! Over at the Commons, some images I've uploaded are being considered for deletion. I'd be interested in hearing your honest opinion on the matter. Thanks! – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 13:07, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

Image CSgt Wayne Mills
Hi Zeimusu! I took the photo of Wayne in September 2004, so technically any copyright is mine but, I uploaded it for anyone to use, as long as they don't try to earn money from it, so as far as I am concerned it's now public domain. Richard Harvey 21:41, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

well the photo of beloyannis was published on a newspaper at the time, and i used from a collection of images i got. the newspaper shutdown decades ago, so i don't think there's a copyright holder

the logo of the Communist Party of Greece is public domain of course

Return of the Untagged Image project
You were kind enough to contribute to the Untagged images project; I beg to draw your attention to part 2 of the project - there are about 12,000 more images in need of tagging. Any assistance you could provide would be most welcome. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk)

Your image recreation request
I just responded to your request on Image recreation requests. I hope the image i found helps. Foobaz · ✐ 07:10, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Mos Def image
Hi, I was speaking to the guy who runs the Mos Def site and he said I could use any image of the site on wikipedia --Hierarchypedia 12:55, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

image license

 * Image:Ducal Prussia Club.jpg was made by me personally, can You kindly take care of it. Thanks. Space Cadet 02:27, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Image:Mt Eden, Auckland.jpg
This image, uploaded by User:Grutness is credited to you. Do you release it under the terms of the gfdl? — Zeimusu | Talk 04:24, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

 * It was an image I took and uploaded to the commons. Grutness then edited it to improve contrast and balance, and uploaded it to en. I've now moved it to the commons and deleted the one on en. I've placed it in the public domain.-gadfium 06:21, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image:Heal all.jpg
In view of User:Anthere's complaint - see - it would be wise if Image sleuthing participants contacted, at least, user's talk pages as part of moving images onto WP:IFD. IFD has hitherto asked for that step to be taken as a courtesy. Besides which, in this case, the image has only been on wikipedia for 13 days ... I respect it is an ophan, but unless you know more it is possible the poor newbie is still trying to work out how to attach it to a page. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

 * OK Well it's only an orphan because I orphaned it. I contacted the uploader when it was first uploaded (see the uploader discussion), I'll contact them again.  — Zeimusu | Talk

 * Eh, where did that user talk page go...  — Zeimusu | Talk

Modular electronics diagrams
What do you think of this proposal?

Village_pump_%28proposals%29

Please leave comments there. Just bringing this to the attention of a handful of people who might care... - Omegatron 00:57, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)

spec miata & mwhf images
spec_miata.jpg is a PD-self

mwhf.gif is for use of/with wikipedia only/not public domain, as he will be selling the series in a book sometime down the road.

i would tag these myself, but i can't seem to find where to go back and edit these with proper tags. let me know where they go and i'd be more than happy to do this in the future - i couldn't find where this was done in any of the "help literature"...

Sikkim
Thanks for the images upload to the commons. Unfortunately I have a dialup connection so it would be too much for me to reupload all the images there. I also have uploaded images to Kalimpong, Calcutta, Tsongmo Lake and Gangtok. Nichalp 20:16, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

Nagarjuna
Thanks for your feedback on the Nagarjuna image - glad you liked it. Yes, it is GDFL - you can see it listed as such if you blow the thumbnail up. You are most welcome to use it however you want Cheers, John Hill.

About those images
Hi. Indeed I'm in fault regarding those and some other images. I haven't yet gotten around to them because I've had limited time to edit, which is worsened by the fact that the website keeps crashing every five minutes. In the cases of those images, I got them in the special website setup by the Brazilian Olympic Committee during the 2004 Olympics. The images published there had a promotional/divulgation purpose, and were not tagged with copyright disclaimers. I believe that the website is gone now (will double check that though), but it was a very singular situation, since images such as those are usually the property of news agencies and/or photographers. They were posted during the Olympics as part of a day-by-day coverage of the performance of Brazilian athletes in the games. I will go about adding those explanations to each image's page asap. Regards, Redux 06:06, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

As Requested
Hi Zeimusu, Source clarified; Though actually it's Media not an Image. Richard Harvey 23:19, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) RHQ DWR

Please temporarily remove this image.
Please temporarily remove this image until I can get the permission as it was on a website maintained for information purpose only. I have already contacted them.

Thanks, User_Talk:Bobby_Awasthi

Image:GreencastleHarbour 2004 SeanMcClean.jpg
Thanks for the message. I hadn't added a copyright tag to that image yet as I'm still trying to understand each type. For that image how do you ensure the artist is protected whilst still letting people use the image? Or is that what you have done by using gfdl, but specifying it for the digitization? Cheers.SeanMack 14:03, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey Zeimusu, gdfl is fine, submit away.SeanMack 11:52, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * The artist is happy we use it and I can upload a higher res image if you think it's worthwhile.SeanMack 10:24, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Bigger pic uploadedSeanMack 13:48, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Tried to nominate, but it didn't seem to update the page - dunno if there is a delay?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Robert_graves_portrait.jpg
I'm quite sure this image qualifies as "fair use". I know the photographer and he has given permission to use his photos - specifically those of Robert Graves - for non-commercial purposes as long as he is credited for the photo.

Is there a proforma other than "fair use" for this kind of situation?

I've added a statement to the source:

http://www.robertgraves.org/gallery/rab_photos?page=1

I hope this clarifies the rights on the photo?

Avante
I really can't explain you how the newspaper frontpages are PD, the first two are historical documents, released in several publications and shown in several expostitions, along with that, being a member of the Party, I obviously reported my work about it in wikipedia. But you could perform the proof by contacting the "owners" of the pictures, the Portuguese Communist Party, or Avante! Editions:

PCP Headquarters: Rua Soeiro Pereira Gomes, 3 1600-196 Lisboa, Portugal Phone: +351 217813800 Fax: +351 217969126 e-mail: pcp@pcp.pt

Avante! admin: Av. Gago Coutinho, 121 1700-029 Lisboa, Portugal editorial.avante@pcp.pt or avante@pcp.pt

Thanks anyway for the warning.

Afonso Silva 14:31, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

PUI
Thanks for giving me a hand on this. A key part of it is notifying the uploader that their image has been listed. This can be done with IMAGENAME. If you are unclear about anything, there are instructions on the top of the PUI page. Cheers. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 13:41, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

Jack Corley
Thanks for the deletion warning. I can't verify the source, let alone the "freeness" of the image. So away it goes, I guess. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 16:46, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Image Copyrights
Oh how I hate those Secret Police that sneak up and catch you on copyright issues! *cries* We Internet Pirates are just trying to illustrate the articles to provide some visual play for the mind as it reads...but then you ruin everything asking for proof of copyright waivers! =Þ (Just kidding around) Anyways, for the OperationMegaphone.jpg picture, I kinda assume it's public domain released by the DND, since it appeared in all Canadian newspapers regardless of parent companies...but other than that, I couldn't really speak either way on the issue. Sherurcij 08:50, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

Hey, about Image:Machinenpistole 18.jpg, would it just be safer to put it as fair use? I'm really new to Wikipedia, so if you could help me out here it would be great! - The Glock

Double-tagging
. This makes things terribly unclear now, since if uploading with an alternate license effectively renders the work dual-licensed, it is difficult to know what license the person making the derivation is using, the alternate license, or the GFDL. Dysprosia 10:20, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

GFDL
Mind explaining how GFDL applies to my picture? --Kitch 17:26, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Coyright status

 * Image:BA 747 Benyhone Tartan.JPG Chris Sheldon via www.airliners.net
 * Image:BA 747s ethnic tailfins.JPG Søren Geertsen via www.airliners.net
 * Image:BA Rendezvous tail.jpg AirQ via www.airliners.net
 * Image:BA-Qantas 747 Wings livery.jpg SamChui via www.SamChuiPhotos.com

All used with permission, I understand that these are no longer acceptable and will be deleted. Mark 19:13, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image of Larisa Latynina
Hi, Zeimusu

The evidence for public domain can be seen at Image:Larisa Latynina.jpg, though I don't know whether this is true or not. You should ask User:Cmapm who uploaded that image. --Voyager 28 June 2005 09:32 (UTC)

 * Hi. Well, for this image, I didn't dig into copyright issue details, because I used image with the same source and the same tag as an example (Image:Ray Ewry.jpg). Perhaps I was wrong to do so. Unfortunately, I haven't enough time to dig into it now, if you believe, that another tag should be more suitable, would you be so kind to replace it yourself? I'm sorry. Best regards. Cmapm 28 June 2005 13:05 (UTC)

Rum Image
The reason I removed the image from rum is that I am planning to submit the article to WP:FAC. Having an image of unknown source is a common objection given against candidate articles, and I felt it was better to avoid the problem entirely. --Allen3 talk July 1, 2005 11:18 (UTC)

 * I have returned the image inside of comments as you suggested. --Allen3 talk July 1, 2005 14:39 (UTC)

Copyright
Thank you for your educated comments. Somehow I suspect that this poster will not be back. I hope I am wrong. Paul, in Saudi 12:03, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Mark Young.gif
I've added the Fair Use tag onto the page already, for your information. I should have added this and I forgot. I don't upload pictures that often, I do editings. I'm trying to make the pages of all the former Governors of Hong Kong look more presentable, with pictures and all. This is a large project! --Arbiteroftruth 06:56, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

New Untagged Images
There are ~5700 new untagged images at Untagged Images/23jun2005. Can you help tag and spread the word to others. --Thanks Nv8200p 19:38, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Whoooops
Sorry about that. the picture was mine so I gfdled it. For some reason I thought that this process was automatic now. I quess this is what i get for thinking. i get to be wrong. . . . . . ... again. Carptrash 04:56, 24 August 2005 (UTC) though you might have to remove the big RED thing on the picture.
 * PS I posted apicture earlier at Samuel Cashwan of Cashwan. On the picture page I explained my process, but perhaps it should be labeled "fair use" ?  I suspect that you understand these things better than I do.  Carptrash 05:01, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help...
Dear Zeimusu,

Thank you for your answers and feedbacks. I'll get the copyright infos of those pics and re-upload them back with the copyright info.

Once again, thank you - Hezery99

Thanks
For the notice on those images. What is your opinion on the case?

Take care, Molotov (talk)  19:55, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

 * I don't think they should be deleted. I added the pictures for a reason, I guess I'll let public WikiDecision decide because I have wanted to leave here for quite some time already. Molotov   (talk)  02:38, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Re:Image:JOSE BUSCAGLIA GUILLERMETY.jpg
Thank you for bringing the issue to my attention. The image was a Press Release and not public domain as you pointed out. I guess I "pushed" the wrong button, you know those things do happen. I made the applicable change. Have a nice day Tony the Marine 17:01, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Re: Images and fair use
That made a lot of sense. Thanks for the info. --Deepak|वार्ता 17:56, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, if I added the same image in the Mahabharata article and described the scene to the image's caption, would it still be a copyright violation? --Deepak|वार्ता 18:10, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Ive found the painting on many sites:, , , , , , . This shows that the image is not restricted to one organisation or person. This one doesnt seem to have any such copyright law. How about changing the tag to . I dont have much knowledge about the copyright laws so I need some guidance here. Tx --Deepak|वार्ता 03:37, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Isopod image
Image fotographed by friend of mine. Permission for use already been granted. Borgx ( talk )|undefined 15:38, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Image of Swirl 360
Regarding image:Swirl360.jpg, I do not know of any fair use justification. I simply got the picture from myspace.com http://g.myspace.com/00052/92/67/52137629_m.jpg

Caravaggio/Pope Paul V
Thanks for the image to go with the article on this painting - I searched but couldn't find online, your help is much appreciated. PiCo 18:52, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zeimusu/images


text:
Fred Lebow

Fred Lebow (June 3, 1932 – October 9, 1994), born Fischel Lebowitz, was a Holocaust survivor, runner, race director, and founder of the New York City Marathon. Born in Arad, Romania, he presided over the transformation of the race from one with 55 finishers in 1970 to one of the largest marathons in the world with more than 52,000 finishers in 2018. He was posthumously inducted into the National Distance Running Hall of Fame in 2001.

Lebow ran in the inaugural marathon in 1970, finishing 45th out of 55 runners with a time of 4:12:09. He ran his last NYC Marathon on November 1, 1992 in celebration of his 60th birthday, after being diagnosed with brain cancer in early 1990, with his friend, nine-time NYC Marathon women's winner Grete Waitz of Norway, with a time of 5:32:35.

During his career he completed 69 marathons in 30 countries. Along with the NYC Marathon he also organized the Empire State Building Run-Up, the Fifth Avenue Mile, and the CrazyLegs Mini Marathon (a 10K road race), which was the first strictly women-only road race. Lebow was also president of New York Road Runners for twenty years.

Death
He died in 1994, and was buried at Mount Hebron Cemetery in Flushing, Queens.

His memorial service at the finish line of the New York City Marathon attracted a crowd of more than 3,000 mourners, which at that time was the largest memorial gathering in Central Park since the death of John Lennon.

Legacy
In 1991, Lebow established Fred's Friends as the first official charity of the New York Marathon. The program uses marathon runners to raise funds for cancer research.

In 1995, Fred's Team was established in honor of Lebow. Every year, athletes of all abilities join Fred's Team to compete in marathons, half-marathons, triathlons, bike races, and other endurance events around the world to raise funds for pioneering research at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. As of 2018, Fred's Team had raised more than $87 million.

In Lebow's honor, a sculpture of him was created by Jesus Ygnacio Dominguez. Unveiled on November 4, 1994, it depicts Lebow timing runners with his watch. In 2001, the statue was moved to its permanent location on the East Side Central Park Drive at 90th St. Every year the statue is moved to a spot in view of the finish line of the marathon.

New York Road Runners hosts an annual race called the Fred Lebow Half-Marathon in January, consisting of 13.1 miles in 2 loops of Central Park.

In popular culture
The documentary Run for Your Life tells the story of Lebow and the New York City Marathon.

title: Fred Lebow


text:
Valeria (wife of Sulla)

Valeria or Valeria Messalla was the fifth wife of two-term consul and Roman dictator Lucius Cornelius Sulla.

Early life
Valeria was the daughter of a man named Marcus Valerius Messalla Niger and Hortensia. She had a brother named Marcus Valerius Messalla Rufus who was consul in 53 BC.

Plutarch calls her a sister of the orator Quintus Hortensius, but this is a mistake, Plutarch probably confused her as his sister instead of niece (Hortensius' sister being Hortensia, Valeria's mother).

Marriages
An "alert young divorcee", as Ronald Syme writes, she attracted the notice of Sulla at the theatre. She and her cousin Marcus Valerius Messalla Niger were seated behind Sulla due to being relatives of a recently retired chief vestal named Caecilia Metella Balearica, which explains why she as a relatively unimportant woman was seated so close to the dictator. Apparently as she passed by him, she plucked out a part of his toga (likely a single thread) which he noticed and turned around to look at who had touched him, she then excused herself and explained that she had meant no harm and had only attempted to take a part of the piece as she had hoped that it would grant her some of Sulla's famous luck. He was seemingly amused by her explanation and charmed by her personality, they continued to exchange some words. Later on in the evening, he would apparently keep looking back at her and asked questions to his companions about who she was. He then learned that she was unmarried and the niece of Quintus Hortensius Hortalus, who was a son-in-law to one of Sullas major supporters. Her family was likely surprised but delighted by his interest in her and would have encouraged her to reciprocate it. It is likely that her cousin Marcus Valerius Messalla Niger who had accompanied her owed his status as pontifex to Sulla.

He married her towards the end of his life. When he retired from public life to a villa in southern Italy, she accompanied him. She was pregnant at the time of his death in 78 BC and had a daughter, Cornelia Postuma, some months later. It is possible that she was infected by the disease which killed her husband and died not much later after giving birth to Postuma.

title: Valeria (wife of Sulla)


text:
Gynandromorphism

A gynandromorph is an organism that contains both male and female characteristics. The term comes from the Greek γυνή (gynē) 'female', ἀνήρ (anēr) 'male', and μορφή (morphē) 'form', and is used mainly in the field of entomology. Gynandromorphism is most frequently recognized in organisms that have strong sexual dimorphism such as certain butterflies, spiders, and birds, but has been recognized in numerous other types of organisms.

Occurrence
Gynandromorphism has been noted in Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) since the 1700s. It has also been observed in crustaceans, such as lobsters and crabs, in spiders, ticks, flies, locusts, crickets, dragonflies, ants, termites, bees, lizards, snakes, rodents,  and birds. It is generally rare but reporting depends on ease of detecting it (whether a species is strongly sexually dimorphic) and how well-studied a region or organism is. For example, up until 2023 gynandromorphism had been reported in more than 40 bird species, but the vast majority of these are from the Palearctic and Nearctic, indicating that it likely is underreported in parts of the world that are not as biologically well-studied.

Pattern of distribution of male and female tissues in a single organism
A gynandromorph can have bilateral symmetry—one side female and one side male. Alternatively, the distribution of male and female tissue can be more haphazard. Bilateral gynandromorphy arises very early in development, typically when the organism has between 8 and 64 cells. Later stages produce a more random pattern.

A notable example in birds is the zebra finch. These birds have lateralised brain structures in the face of a common steroid signal, providing strong evidence for a non-hormonal primary sex mechanism regulating brain differentiation.

Causes
The cause of this phenomenon is typically (but not always) an event in mitosis during early development. While the organism contains only a few cells, one of the dividing cells does not split its sex chromosomes typically. This leads to one of the two cells having sex chromosomes that cause male development and the other cell having chromosomes that cause female development. For example, an XY cell undergoing mitosis duplicates its chromosomes, becoming XXYY. Usually this cell would divide into two XY cells, but in rare occasions the cell may divide into an X cell and an XYY cell. If this happens early in development, then a large portion of the cells are X and a large portion are XYY. Since X and XYY dictate different sexes, the organism has tissue that is female and tissue that is male.

A developmental network theory of how gynandromorphs develop from a single cell based on a working paper links between parental allelic chromosomes was proposed in 2012. The major types of gynandromorphs, bilateral, polar and oblique are computationally modeled. Many other possible gynandromorph combinations are computationally modeled, including predicted morphologies yet to be discovered. The article relates gynandromorph developmental control networks to how species may form. The models are based on a computational model of bilateral symmetry.

As a research tool
Gynandromorphs occasionally afford a powerful tool in genetic, developmental, and behavioral analyses. In Drosophila melanogaster, for instance, they provided evidence that male courtship behavior originates in the brain, that males can distinguish conspecific females from males by the scent or some other characteristic of the posterior, dorsal, integument of females, that the germ cells originate in the posterior-most region of the blastoderm, and that somatic components of the gonads originate in the mesodermal region of the fourth and fifth abdominal segment.

title: Gynandromorphism


text:
Charles "Buddy" Rogers

Charles Edward "Buddy" Rogers (August 13, 1904 – April 21, 1999) was an American film actor and musician. During the peak of his popularity in the late 1920s and early 1930s, he was publicized as "America's Boyfriend".

Early years
Rogers was born to Maude and Bert Henry Rogers in Olathe, Kansas. He studied at the University of Kansas where he became an active member of Phi Kappa Psi. In the mid-1920s he began acting professionally in Hollywood films. A talented trombonist skilled on several other musical instruments, Rogers performed with his own dance band in motion pictures and on radio. During World War II, he served in the United States Navy as a flight training instructor.

According to American Dance Bands On Record and Film (1915–1942), compiled by Richard J. Johnson and Bernard H. Shirley (Rustbooks Publishing, 2010), Rogers was not a bandleader in the usual sense of the term. Instead, he was a film actor who fronted bands for publicity purposes. In 1933–34, Rogers took over the popular Joe Haymes orchestra, to which he added drummer Gene Krupa. His later bands were organized by Milt Shaw.

In 1930, he recorded two records for Columbia as a solo singer with a small jazz band accompanying. In 1932, he signed with Victor and recorded four dance band records with a group organized by drummer, and later actor, Jess Kirkpatrick. In 1938, he signed with Vocalion and recorded six swing records (see discography below).

Career
Nicknamed "Buddy", his most-remembered performance in film was opposite Clara Bow in the 1927 Academy Award winning Wings, the first film ever honored as Best Picture. In 1968, he appeared as himself in an episode of Petticoat Junction titled "Wings", a direct reference to the silent movie.

Recognition
For his contribution to the motion picture industry, Rogers has a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame at 6135 Hollywood Blvd, which was dedicated on February 8, 1960.

Respected by his peers for his work in film and for his humanitarianism, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences honored Rogers in 1986 with The Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award.

A Golden Palm Star on the Palm Springs Walk of Stars was dedicated to him in 1993.

Personal life
On June 24, 1937, Rogers became the third husband of silent film actress Mary Pickford. Their romance had begun in 1927, when they co-starred in My Best Girl, but the two kept their relationship hidden until Pickford's separation and 1936 divorce from Douglas Fairbanks. The couple adopted two children—Roxanne and Ronald—and remained married for 42 years until Pickford's death in 1979.

In 1981, Rogers married real estate agent Beverly Ricono.

Death
Rogers died at his home in Rancho Mirage, California, on April 21, 1999, at the age of 94 of natural causes, and was interred at Forest Lawn Cemetery, Cathedral City, near Palm Springs.

Partial filmography

 * Fascinating Youth (1926) - Teddy Ward
 * More Pay, Less Work (1926) - Willia Hinchfield
 * So's Your Old Man (1926) - Kenneth Murchison
 * Wings (1927) - Jack Powell
 * My Best Girl (1927) - Joe Grant
 * Get Your Man (1927) - Robert Albin
 * Abie's Irish Rose (1928) - Abie Levy
 * Varsity (1928) - Jimmy Duffy
 * Someone to Love (1928) - William Shelby
 * Red Lips (1928) - Hugh Carver / Buddy
 * Close Harmony (1929) - Al West
 * River of Romance (1929) - Tom Rumford
 * Illusion (1929) - Carlee Thorpe
 * Half Way to Heaven (1929) - Ned Lee
 * Young Eagles (1930) - Lieutenant Robert Banks
 * Paramount on Parade (1930) - Buddy Rogers - Episode 'Love Time'
 * Safety in Numbers (1930) - William Butler Reynolds
 * Follow Thru (1930) - Jerry Downes
 * Heads Up (1930) - Jack Mason
 * Along Came Youth (1930) - Larry Brooks
 * The Slippery Pearls (1931, Short) - 'Buddy' Rogers
 * The Lawyer's Secret (1931) - Laurie Roberts
 * The Road to Reno (1931) - Tom Wood
 * Working Girls (1931) - Boyd Wheeler
 * This Reckless Age (1932) - Bradley Ingals
 * Best of Enemies (1933) - Jimmie Hartman
 * Take a Chance (1933) - Kenneth Raleigh
 * Dance Band (1935) - Buddy Morgan
 * Old Man Rhythm (1935) - Johnny Roberts
 * One in a Million (1936) - Pierre
 * Let's Make a Night of It (1937) - Jack Kent
 * This Way Please (1937) - Brad Morgan
 * Golden Hoofs (1941) - Dean MacArdle
 * The Mexican Spitfire's Baby (1941) - Dennis Lindsay
 * Sing for Your Supper (1941) - Larry Hays
 * Mexican Spitfire at Sea (1942) - Dennis Lindsay
 * Mexican Spitfire Sees a Ghost (1942) - Dennis Lindsay
 * Twelfth Street Rag (1942) - Himself
 * An Innocent Affair (1948) - Claude Kimball
 * The Parson and the Outlaw (1957) - Rev. Jericho Jones

Discography
As Charles "Buddy" Rogers (America's Boy Friend)
 * February 27, 1930 & March 4, 1930
 * (I'd like to be) A Bee in Your Boudoir/My Future Just Passed (Columbia 2183-D)
 * March 4, 1930
 * Any Time's the Time to Fall in Love/(Up on Top of a Rainbow) Sweepin' the Clouds Away (Columbia 2143-D)

As Buddy Rogers and His California Cavaliers
 * April 18, 1932
 * You Fascinate Me/Hello,Gorgeous (Victor 24001)
 * May 11, 1932
 * In My Hideaway/Happy-Go-Lucky You (And Broken-Hearted Me) (Victor 24015)
 * May 18, 1932
 * I Beg Your Pardon, Mademoiselle/With My Sweetie in the Moonlight (Victor 24031)
 * Please Handle with Care/Ask Yourself Who Loves You (Victor 24049)

As Buddy Rogers and his Famous Swing Band (vocals by Buddy Rogers, except Bob Hannon# or Joe Mooney@, or Elizabeth Tilton$)
 * April 5, 1938
 * Lovelight in the Starlight#/This Time It's Real# (Vocalion 4058)
 * Moonshine over Kentucky (v/BR)/Little Lady Make-Believe# (Vocalion 4071)
 * June 29, 1938
 * Figaro#/Meet the Beat of My Heart# (Vocalion 4227)
 * Happy as a Lark (v/BR)/The Sunny Side of Things@ (Vocalion 4240)
 * September 17, 1938
 * You Can't Be Mine (And Someone Else's Too)$/While A Cigarette Was Burning$ (Vocalion 4408)
 * This Is Madness (to Love Like This)#/Rainbow 'Round the Moon (instrumental) (Vocalion 4422)

title: Charles "Buddy" Rogers