text:
User talk:Ed it

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk 00:04, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Image Tagging Image:Rolandmc202.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rolandmc202.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 08:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord6a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord6a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord5b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord5b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord5a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord5a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord4b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord4b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord4a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord4a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord3b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord3b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord3a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord3a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord2b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord2b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord2a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord2a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord1b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord1b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord1a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord1a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord10b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord10b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lord10a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lord10a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Global goon goon front cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Global goon goon front cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gg afterlife.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gg afterlife.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stakker

A tag has been placed on Stakker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Malcolma (talk) 09:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vatican Nitez

The article Vatican Nitez has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Non notable album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ed it


text:
Jack Daniels (New Mexico politician)

Jack Daniels (October 23, 1923 – September 3, 2003) was a Democratic New Mexico state representative. He ran unsuccessfully for the governorship in 1970, and for the United States Senate in 1972.

In his last major election against Pete Domenici in 1972, Daniels took advantage of his name, which was similar to that of Jack Daniel's, a popular alcoholic beverage. He handed out tiny bottles of Jack Daniel's whiskey while campaigning. Despite this, he still lost the election to Pete Domenici, 54% to 46%.

Early life
Daniels was born in Council Bluffs, Iowa, in 1923. His family moved to Hobbs, New Mexico, in 1937. After graduation from New Mexico Military Institute in 1943, Daniels served on the destroyer USS Walton (DE-361) in the Pacific theater of World War II. He returned home to join his father's insurance agency. He served on the boards of a number of community associations, and was a New Mexico state representative from 1967 to 1970. He was appointed to the New Mexico State House by Governor Jack Campbell to succeed then-deceased Representative Ray McNeill.

Governor election
In 1970, Daniels entered the Democratic primary in the race to fill the open seat left by outgoing liberal Republican governor David F. Cargo, who was unable to seek a third term due to term limits. A major issue in the election was how the University of New Mexico should deal with anti-war protesters. Defenders of the university did so on the grounds of free speech, and opponents argued on the grounds of law and order.

Daniels ran as a moderate liberal candidate, and he became the strongest defender of the University of New Mexico throughout the campaign. Bruce King was the other moderate liberal candidate, and he and Daniels agreed on most issues, with them both supporting the University of New Mexico. However, Daniels was more vigorous in his support, constantly advertising and emphasizing that he supported the university's position, while Bruce King mostly avoided the issue. On the other hand, Alexander Sceresse attacked the university, calling for law and order. The Democratic primary had above-average turnout, with 54% voting, and King beat Daniels 49%-37%, with Sceresse only getting 14% of the vote. Bruce King then went on to become Governor of New Mexico.

Senate election
In 1972 New Mexico's senior U.S. senator, Clinton Presba Anderson, retired for health reasons. Jack Daniels was nominated as the Democrat in his place and ran against Republican Pete Domenici, but lost with Domenici winning 54% of the vote. The election was affected by the presidential election, because Richard Nixon was up for reelection in 1972, and he was very popular in New Mexico. Furthermore, George McGovern, Nixon's opponent, was considered too liberal by many of the New Mexico voters, which hurt local Democrats like Jack Daniels. However, Jack Daniels gained prominence in the election when he gave out Jack Daniel's whiskey at his campaign rallies.

Death and legacy
In his later years, Daniels was diagnosed with Alzheimer's. He died on September 3, 2003, in Hobbs, New Mexico. In his memory, Governor Bill Richardson ordered that flags be flown on half-staff on September 5.

His daughter, Diane Denish, served two terms as Lieutenant Governor of New Mexico and ran unsuccessfully for governor in 2010.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Jack Daniels (New Mexico politician)


text:
User talk:TotoBaggins

Note: My name is Sean, and I sign my posts as such. --Sean/TotoBaggins

Minor edits
Remember to mark your edits as minor only when they genuinely are (see Minor edit). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'." (thanks for all your edits, no matter how minor) -Willmcw 06:09, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Main page
Sorry I keep messing up you comment on the talk page for the Main Page. I think I have fixed it now. Damn vandals made everything difficult! By the way, Welcome to Wikipedia! Psy guy (talk) 22:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Grigori Perelman
Millenium Prize problems is simply a redirect to Clay Mathematics Institute, which is why I removed the link (twice, at least!). Can you please self-revert? TIA ---CH 23:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

 * I decided to go ahead with it on the theory that at some point MPP would have its own page distinct from CMI. That said, sure, why not?

Well, OK. I am done trying to clean it up anyway. ---CH 23:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Astronomical-Limb.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Astronomical-Limb.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Monophyletic pic
Hello, TotoBaggins! I like the new figure you created for Phylogenetics. Is it OK if I adapt it for the Cladistics article? EdJohnston 02:17, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, of course. I derived it from another work anyway, since the (para|poly|mono)-phyly distinction wasn't clear to me without a picture, and I figured others might feel the same way.

Commons POTY identity confirmation == ==

I confirm I am the same user as 69.134.237.245 on the POTY vote.

License tagging for Image:Lilac-Chaser.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Lilac-Chaser.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Redundant sentence in lede para and text of Ghostwriter article
Hi, By definition, the body of the article will have material that seems redundant after the lede (intro paragraph), since the lede summarizes the content and key arguments of the article. I think that trimming one of the 2 parts (make the lede's reference shorter, or if you prefer, make the 2nd time it comes up shorter) would have been better than chopping the whole para in the body of the article. Just some ideasNazamo 16:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the suggestion. I felt that it was very awkward for the identical sentence to appear so close to the first instance.  Perhaps I should have just reworded it, but I thought it read fine without it.  --TotoBaggins 20:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you and a question
Thank you so much for your help! Would it be hard to modify this so that instead of using a single pixel x-column, it uses the average value in a range of x? That is, the sample would come from a wide multi-pixel band. ike9898 15:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Sure, my pleasure. I'm not a graphics programmer by trade, so dabbling with this kind of thing can be fun.  Here's a version that does what you want (I had actually already made that improvement; it helps a bit with the banding).

use Image::Magick; use strict; use constant MAX_COLOR => 0xFFFF; sub usage {    die "usage: $0 IMAGE-SOURCE REFERENCE-COLUMN-CENTER REFERENCE-COLUMN-WIDTH\n"; }
 * 1) !/usr/bin/perl -w

my $err;

my $fname = shift or usage; my $reference_column = shift or usage; my $band_width = shift or usage; my $src = Image::Magick->new; $err = $src->Read($fname); die $err if $err; my $height = $src->Get('height'); my $width = $src->Get('width'); my $dest = Image::Magick->new; $err = $dest->Set(size => "${width}x$height"); $err = $dest->ReadImage('xc:white'); die $err if $err; $" = ','; my @colors = qw(R G B); foreach my $y (0 .. $height) {    my @ref_pixel;     print "Doing row $y of $height\n" unless $y % 10;     foreach my $offset (-$band_width/2 .. $band_width/2)     {         my $refcol = $offset + $reference_column;         my @ref_pixel_el = split ',', $src->Get("pixel[$refcol,$y]");         for (0 .. 3)         {             $ref_pixel[$_] += $ref_pixel_el[$_];         }     }     for (0 .. 3)     {         $ref_pixel[$_] /= $band_width;     }     foreach my $x (0 .. $width)     {         my @pixel = split ',', $src->Get("pixel[$x,$y]");         foreach my $color (0 .. 2)         {             $pixel[$color] += (MAX_COLOR - $ref_pixel[$color]);             $pixel[$color] = MAX_COLOR if $pixel[$color] > MAX_COLOR;         }         $err = $dest->Set("pixel[$x,$y]" => "@pixel");         die $err if $err;     } } my $box_right  = $reference_column + 1; $dest->Draw(stroke      => 'red', strokewidth => 1, primitive  => 'line', points     => "$box_right,0 $box_right,$height"); $err = $dest->Write("out-$fname"); die $err if $err;

Umbilical cord
Hey there, TB. You may have already noticed it, but I wanted to let you know about my reply to the question on umbilical cords you asked a few days ago. I wouldn't normally leave a note on a user's talk page except that the original answer you received was dead wrong. :-) --David Iberri (talk) 16:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Hey, thanks so much for the detailed answer. I'm glad you wrote, as I had missed it.  --TotoBaggins 16:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Reference Desk answers
Your answers and remarks on the Reference Desk(s) are much appreciated. The wry wit and direct responses help keep that place interesting and useful. Regards. dr.ef.tymac 17:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for the kind words! I've finally found a positive outlet for my character flaw of being a know-it-all misanthrope. :)  --TotoBaggins 17:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Mental illness post
Hello TotoBaggins, my reply on the reference desk: “what mental illnesses are related to heterosexuality?” was meant to counter what I perceive as an obvious homophobic bias in the Mental IIIness question. It seems to me that the question is really asking “homosexuality is a mental illness, isn’t it?” or at least supporting the view held by some people that homosexuality causes people to go insane or something. My answer was intended to point out the stupidity of associating sexual orientation directly with mental illness, while also giving the questioner the benefit of the doubt. I would appreciate it if you did not jump on me like that in the future. Thanks, S.dedalus 20:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, sorry! I didn't mean to jump on you at all, but should have been more cautious as I was already feeling contentious after a previous misstep.  --TotoBaggins 20:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, I was just feeling a bit miffed at the whole question. I probably should have avoided the question since I have such strong bias in that aria. S.dedalus 22:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi TotoBaggins,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Moons of solar system v7.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-06-11.  howcheng  {chat} 17:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:MtStSepulchrePanorama-ghosts.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MtStSepulchrePanorama-ghosts.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Clio is back
Your second-best poster is back, Toto, thanks to you and others. How could I possibly let you down? You will find an explanatory note on my talk page. Clio the Muse 23:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Ref Desk/Humanities' Template
Thanks for the fix.Bielle 01:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure no prob. Just more fallout from the recent gnashing, I guess.  --TotoBaggins 01:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Guano depository
Hah! ---Sluzzelin talk  01:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Notice
Reference desk/Seagulls. I think you messed up a wee bit -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 02:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The Importance of Punctuation
Hiya,

It sounds like the letter you were talking about on the misc reference desk is this one. — Matt Eason (Talk • Contribs) 19:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Hey, awesome, thanks! I hadn't seen that thing in 20 years. I'm going to start using this line in my breakups: Admit to being useless and inferior.  :)  --TotoBaggins 19:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Haha, no problem :) — Matt Eason (Talk • Contribs) 19:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Nice knife image
Thanks for telling me about the image you made better. If I knew how to do it myself I would have made it a vector image from the start. Beautiful work, TotoBaggins. Waerloeg 00:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Hey, thanks for the kind words. I'm barely competent at it myself, but do enjoy puttering around with Inkscape.  I definitely have to stick to things like knife blades while I dream about drawing things like this critter. :)  --TotoBaggins 01:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Picture of the Day
Are you Jeremy.Hinton? Regardless, thanks for sharing this image with us. Very fascinating.-- Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 12:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope, my real name is Sean. And while I did tweak a recent Picture of the Day, I've not actually been the main force behind any of them.  Thanks for the kind words just the same, though.  --TotoBaggins 13:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Whipped Slave FP Candidate
Just wanted to let you know that I've uploaded a couple of new edits of the for consideration. They may help with the image quality discussion. MamaGeek (talk/contrib) 14:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Protect articles against POV vandalism
I've replied here. Please enable your email as well if you can. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 14:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It was really easy for me to find news sources refering to the polar bear as cute. If you're looking for sources saying something, just search them up in Google. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 11:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Belated thanks
Hey, I logged in after a while, and just noticed that you had nominated my mendhi photo as a feature picture. I know it didn't get promoted but thank you very much either way. I appreciate the gesture. Zainub 17:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure. I really liked it!  --TotoBaggins 21:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

hadrosaurs thank you
Hi TB - thanks for creating the image map on the hadrosaur family tree. It's a great addition to the image, and to the article! Ciao, Debivort 06:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, no prob. I love the work that you do!  --TotoBaggins 13:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

thanks!
thanks for responding to my question regarding the htoo brothers. i was about their age at the time (well i guess that would mean i still am) so thats why my memory was so vague. thanks again.
 * Sure, no prob! --TotoBaggins 19:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Finding featured pictures
Either you have WAY too much time on your hands or you have a better way of finding FP's on a certain subject than I do. :) Specifically, these static shots of vehicles--how'd you come up with it? I assume they're not otherwise collected somewhere or you would've just included that one link instead of each one individually. I've wondered how to easily locate FP's of a certain subject before in order to compare and evaluate FPC's, and this could help me a lot. --Peter 21:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Bad news: I just have WAY too much time on my hands! It helps to be on the clock. ;)   There are some categories in the FP list, but vehicles isn't one of them.  --TotoBaggins 21:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Bearnstar

 * Awesome, my first barnstar, and I love that goofy bear! Thanks!  --TotoBaggins 14:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Finding first edition of a page that contains a text
That code on your userpage looks really useful. Doing it manually takes too much time. How do I use it? I know nothing about computers. A.Z. 20:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

 * I must say that, if it works, then it's an extremely useful tool that I needed many times already and that I think should be included as a standard Wikipedia tool easily available to all users. A.Z. 20:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

 * You have to have Perl installed. If you use something Unixy like MacOS or Linux, you already do, otherwise you'd have to go get it from ActiveState.  Then you can enter a command like:

perl wiki-blame.pl http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TotoBaggins 'That code on your userpage looks really useful.'
 * and it will reply:

Earliest revision: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TotoBaggins&oldid=152099136
 * Let me know if that works for you! --Sean 23:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

 * I'm sorry. I can't understand it. I'm going to ask at the computing reference desk. A.Z. 02:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Aliasing your script
I'm not familiar with perl, but is it possible to setup an alias for it to simplify things? Such as, having "perl wiki-blame.pl http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/", so that all that needs to be done is "wikiblame END_OF_URL 'text'"? I am using bash, if that's very important -- lucid 21:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The ancient eye
Dear Sean, thank you so much for that lovely star. It's always nice being appreciated by one's peers, but what really made my day was the inclusion of my absolute favorite animal's eye! Thank you again, and I'm looking forward to seeing you around at the desks, fellow sleuth! (Speaking of which, it took this sleuth a while to realize that Sean and TotoBaggins were one and the same person :-)) ---Sluzzelin talk  11:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. Octopuses are cool, and it was fun to make.
 * Yes, I'm annoyed that I chose a silly nickname in the first place and now have this confusing thing, but now can't be bothered to start over. --Sean 11:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Heh, I don't think it's any sillier than my moniker, but I was never sure whether it was an Oz-meets-Middle-Earth thing, or another Hobbit I had never heard of ("o" being quite popular in the Shire what with all the Frodos, Drogos, and Folcos - ack I hope Toto isn't a long lost relative of the Sackville Bagginses Longo and Otho! ;-) ---Sluzzelin talk  12:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Field Maples
Don't worry I am a worthy custodian of the hundred or so mature trees in my garden (and none of them are super-old ents: I guess none over 400 years despite the garden being scheduled as pre 1250). I used to dream about having a lot of majestic oaks etc but now I've got them I have come to realise none of them are maintenance free and the solutions are never ever-lasting. I am planting lots of younger trees too. A lot of the problem is that the people (mainly Victorians) who planted the very slow growers (white walnut, yew, field maple) never planned space for when they were full grow. Now the overcrowding is an interesting challenge: a full grown oak will kill a fully grown beech at ten feet. Ho hum. --BozMo talk 09:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response, and I'm glad to hear it! I hope I didn't come off as accusatory; in my part of the world (southeastern USA) people will clear land of magnificent trees without a second thought, and I wanted to see what the rationale was if that was true in your case, which it certainly doesn't sound like it is.  Cheers!  --Sean 15:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi TotoBaggins,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Tecumseh sherman.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-10-25.  howcheng  {chat} 17:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Procaryote cell, liscencing, and Featured picture
Hi, i am LadyofHats, i wanted to make you some comments refering to my image Image:Prokaryote cell diagram.svg, i do not mind you editing the image but still when you uploaded the old version you changed the liscensing and the authorship of the image is completly gone, if you could check that i would apreciate it. also it has no sence to make duplicated versions of the images.

I am greatfull that you try to promote my images as featured pictures and i hope i dont disapoint you saying that i see few sence in doing so, my experience with FP is that no matter how acurate or well done an image is there will be always someone proposing to change it. a good example of it would be the grey bacterias you just took out of the procaryote image. since i had add them under request too. i will post a more complete answer in FP but i wanted to ask you about the lisencing... i hope you dont find me too cooky. i just want to keep an eye on my work-LadyofHats 15:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Hi, and thanks for writing back. I didn't mean to change the licensing and lose the history.  I'll go fix that.  --Sean 15:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Permission to use your Phylogenetic groups image
I'd like to use the abovementioned image to illustrate a seminar announcement (in Norwegian). The license doesn't seem to allow that, unless I put the entire seminar announcement under the same license, which seems like going overboard. Will you let me use the image without doing so, in this particular case? Hanche 17:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, sure; I've changed the license to public domain. Enjoy!  --Sean 18:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Hanche 23:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Sean,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:World War II woman aircraft worker, Vega Aircraft Corporation, Burbank, California 1942.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-18.  howcheng  {chat} 22:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Honus Wagner touchup
Thanks for uploading the edit, although I still support the original I'm very curious as to how you did it. Was this done with the clone tool in photoshop? Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 03:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I also support the original.
 * I use Linux, so don't have Photoshop. The GIMP is a reasonable substitute for my modest needs.  I didn't use the clone tool, but rather copied a square portion of the card off to the right of the blemish, reversed it horizontally, pasted it over the blemish, and then softened the edges with an eraser at half transparency.  I find that the clone tool often gives a noticeable spottiness (as in the Reuters photo scandal), and it's often better to copy a largish area.  I reversed it horizontally as I find that the eye picks up on direct copies, but flipping it throws that off.   I'm a programmer by trade, so all this is just me goofing around.  Some of the photo edits that people can do are simply stunning (as in the lead photo in the boxing article).  Cheers! --Sean 03:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

"Why doesn't boyancy work in solids?"
You wrote, "presumably the wooden ones will float to the top due to buoyancy", and reading it quickly, I was thinking, "but only if they're the same size", and then I noticed you'd said that yourself, and then I wondered what you possibly could have wlinked it to, and I thought, "Certainly not...", but you had. Nicely done. :-) —Steve Summit (talk) 02:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks; I aim to please! :)  --Sean 16:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Flagella Diagram
Hi! I saw your note about collaborating on a flagella diagram on the talk page. I work on eukaryotic flagella, and think it would be fun to collaborate on this, assuming it was eukaryotic flagella you were hoping to diagram??? Fritzlaylin (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your nice compliment!  S a u d a d e 7  10:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * I don't think I deserve it for my small contribution, but thanks! --Sean 20:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Wilhelm Frick
Hello Toto, I really don't understand you. Do you enjoy with that terrible image?. What of "enc" that image has?. Do not you think that perhaps it's a shock to a sensitive person?. It's a corpse, with blood on the neck. Is it necessary?. Why? If all we know that Frick is dead, he's dead, we don't need an image showing how he was at his death's time. Don't you believe it?. I didn't remove the image but I strongly support it. I wait your answer. Good Luck. Ahmed987147 🇮🇱 (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Ahmed. No I don't enjoy that image, but nor do I enjoy any of these below.  That said, they're all very encyclopedic, and their articles would be poorer without them.  --Sean 00:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

OK, you have your point of view and it's very respectable to me, I only want to clarify that I'm not the user who is removing the picture. I abstain to remove the image. I don't know what user is removing it. But I'm not. Kisses Ahmed987147 🇮🇱 (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Good work!
Great work with that Jesus/Bible statistical analysis at the reference desk. Above and beyond the call of duty. Good one. AndyJones (talk) 07:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

 * My cheers as well for that one and this when if a picture's worth 1k words, these were so much more. Still smiling, Julia Rossi (talk) 07:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

We're off to see the Grocer, the wonderful GrocerOfOz.

 * Thanks, CF! --Sean 13:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Frog on a lily pad (or ??)
Your response to my query on the Science Ref Desk just now, does it for me. Many thanks! -- Deborahjay (talk) 18:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Great; glad I could help. I have personally sat upon a large lily pad as a child in South Africa, so it's a topic near to my heart. :) --Sean 19:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Manhattan distance
Hi Sean. I answered your question on Reference_desk/Archives/Mathematics/2008_July_14. Bo Jacoby (talk) 13:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC).
 * Hey, thanks for the alternative explanation. It was good.  --Sean 13:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Family Circus
Now that made me laugh! ---Sluzzelin talk  13:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * :) --Sean 14:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Pop Culture Refs
What's with removing popular references? They may be a bit frivolous, but the section is clearly delineated and it draws interest/attention. --24.13.104.139 (talk) 00:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Another barnstar

 * Hey, thanks a lot! --Sean 11:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Let me tag another barnstar onto this one!
 * {| style="border: 1px solid ; background-color: ;"

 * rowspan="2" valign="middle" |
 * rowspan="2" |
 * style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | Mini WP:RD Barnstar!
 * style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Awarded to Sean for answering my question on the Ref Desk
 * }
 * }

New message at the ref desk
Hi thanks for you help today. I replied to your message. --Drogonov (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, no prob. --Sean 13:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:BagginsBug1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BagginsBug1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:BagginsBug2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BagginsBug2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Did I ...
... just answer a homework question? ---Sluzzelin talk  17:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I assume so, but so what; you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it read Cry, the Beloved Country. I removed my own post as frivolous.  --Sean 17:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, it made me aware of what I did. Guess I shouldn't remove it now. I hate it when that happens. ---Sluzzelin  talk  17:15, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Reference Desk Chatty Template
I applied the new template to a user this morning. By the time I got back to the desk, the chatty post had been removed by a different user. I think we may be having an effect simply by having the discussion, but the template may help. We'll see how this particular user responds... (hopefully in a positive way). Nimur (talk) 13:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, well I'm glad it was useful. An ulterior motive I had in writing it was to get better at MediaWiki's daffy template syntax.  :)  --Sean 19:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Planet Color Guy
I've added some additional info to last weekend's WT:RD thread and raised the question of whether it's time to suspend PCG's ref desk privileges. As you'd commented in the thread, I specifically want to invite your input. — Lomn 18:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

unset lang
In reply to here, I'm not sure if I'm doing it right because this is what get's outputted when I type unset LANG ~/.bashrc: -bash: unset: `/home/kjduke/.bashrc': not a valid identifier. Am I just doing it wrong? -- penubag  (talk) 06:54, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You should just add the line:

unset LANG
 * to the bottom of the file called ~/.bashrc (which in your case is the same as /home/kjduke/.bashrc). You can edit that file with whatever text editor you're using to edit your source code.  Let me  know if you have a problem.  --Sean 16:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you much! That seemed to work. -- penubag  (talk) 02:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Reference Desk archiving interval
There's a discussion running on the RD talk page about decreasing the archiving and transclusion thresholds to reduce the page size, perhaps to as few as four days. I don't care one way or the other, but I'd like to make sure any consensus includes input from some long-time regulars, so I'm dropping this note on the talk pages of a few that pop to mind. (I hope no one feels this is improper canvassing.) —Steve Summit (talk) 01:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Bee Flies
Hi there. On the Science Reference desk, you made an ID request here for me. Also, I made a mistake, writing ¾ longer than most flies. What I actually meant was ¾ of an inch long. Would you mind changing this in the ID request? Thanks, --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I changed it. Someone has said they think it's in genus Archytas.   --Sean 14:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Inadvertent deletion
Restored now. Wouldn't want you to think I was a rouge admin with strong POV about salt-related issues. Edison (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and I've been here long enough that I'd have no trouble believing such an admin existed. :) --Sean 19:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Resin-identification-code-2-HDPE.svg
Thank you for uploading File:Resin-identification-code-2-HDPE.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:William Hogarth 023.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:William Hogarth 023.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Re. my talkpage problem
Thanks a lot for the fix. Best, The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Flossing
Let me know if you can use any more information.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 20:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

File:User-TotoBaggins-flow.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:User-TotoBaggins-flow.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Manhattan.png
Thank you for uploading File:Manhattan.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

File:TotoBaggins-George-W-Bush.jpeg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TotoBaggins-George-W-Bush.jpeg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

Updated version of File:Moons of solar system v7.jpg?
Hi, thanks for your work on File:Moons of solar system v7.jpg. I was wondering if you were open to making a new version, with some new images. For example, File:Two Halves of Titan.png, File:Hyperion true.jpg, and File:Voyager 2 picture of Oberon.jpg. Maybe a version with Mars? Well, there are a lot possibilities. Thanks in advance. Fotaun (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * All those objects are already on there. Are you saying the images of them should be replaced? --Sean 17:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, swaps for color and fuller discs if it seems worthwhile. Some ideas for additions are Janus, Amalthea, and Epimetheus. For size comparison, maybe a version with Mars, or crescent Neptune on the edge. However, it might be better to have a "small moons of the solar system" for all the smaller satellites since Dactyl, Phobos, etc. cannot really be seen on the big one. Fotaun (talk) 18:43, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that's worth the effort, but feel free to go ahead if you like! --Sean 19:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Vertical.svg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vertical.svg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Evacuation chair

A tag has been placed on Evacuation chair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Zhaofeng Li [ talk... contribs... ] 02:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Asperities.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Another one of your uploads, File:Beetle-pron.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Export (C++) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Export (C++). Since you had some involvement with the Export (C++) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Websearch
Template:Websearch has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Belton House 2006.Giano.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Belton House 2006.Giano.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 02:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Sad indian listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sad indian. Since you had some involvement with the Sad indian redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Earth and Moon to scale.svg

The file File:Earth and Moon to scale.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Redundant to File:Earth-Moon.png, which is a featured image and is much better."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:14, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hey there!

This is to let you know that File:Citric_acid_cycle_with_aconitate_2.svg, a featured picture you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 25, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-08-25. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 13:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:TotoBaggins