text:
Talk:Undisputed Attitude

Kurt Cobain's brain? WTF?
"A rumor about the album is that there is a photo of Kurt Cobain's brain in the artwork" Can someone explain this? --Dexter prog 16:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Dead reference
SlayerSaves.com reference is dead. Gocsa 12:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've used the Internet Archive to address this, so the reference now uses the archived version of the page. LuciferMorgan (talk) 11:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

GA nomination on hold

 * "and three original songs by the thrash metal band Slayer" - "the" not necessary
 * I've removed "the". LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

 * "The album received generally negative reviews; " - you quote 2 reviews here and the 2nd seems positive
 * Fixed. LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

 * I think you need a more specific URL than - I can't find the one you're citing by the look of it...
 * I added "Part 1 and 2" to the title so the reader knows which interview it is, i did this otherwise it would open windows media player with a direct link M3tal H3ad (talk) 03:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

 * - Professional review, add to infobox?
 * I've added the review to the infobox. LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

 * AMG/RS have to be in italics in the infobox
 * They're now in italics. LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

That be all. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 04:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Aaand passed. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 09:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice work! --kingboyk (talk) 14:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Drummer on this CD
Jon Dette was NOT on this CD. Only the tour to promote it. Paul Bostaph was the drummer in the studio for recording the CD. AkiruYoshima (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Studio album?
How is this a studio album, and not a cover album? -- Zsero (talk) 02:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Genre...
This album should be listed under thrashcore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.220.148 (talk) 08:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 09:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Undisputed Attitude


text:
Talk:Diabolus in Musica

Fair use rationale for Image:Slayer - Diabolus in Musica Back.jpg
Image:Slayer - Diabolus in Musica Back.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

the term

 * diabolus in musica was not a scale but an interval in Medieval music: the augmented fourth or tritonus, a stacking of three major seconds like f(-g-a)-b natural.

Jcwf (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Well it's referred to a scale in all the sources so i guess if you have reliable sources the appropriate information can be added. M3tal H3ad (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

 * It's a specific dissonance which the medieval modal system considered particularly unmusical. See and the article on tritone. The article should also have a hatnote linking to the disambiguation page at Diabolus in musica. Gimmetrow 07:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

GA nom on hold
This is only my fifth review, so bare with me.
 * "Released on June 9, 1998 through American Recordings, it is the second studio album to feature drummer Paul Bostaph." This should be seperated into different sentances.
 * The album sold 46,000 copies in its first week to peak at number 31 on the Billboard 200, although received mixed critical reviews. This should probably be re-worded, its kind of confusing.
 * Blabbermouth.net shouldn't be italicized
 * Blabbermouth.net shouldn't be linked in ref 8
 * That is all. Leave a not on my talk page when you are done. Nice job by the way, you rule. \m/ — Burningclean [ Speak the truth! ] 22:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks. M3tal H3ad (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Additional comment:
 * Please wikilink Latin in the intro.
 * In the tracklisting section, delimit the titles on their corresponding duration with a dash, using the code for en dash. Thank you. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Passed. — Burningclean [ Speak the truth! ] 01:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

guitar tuning
allright, to all you non guitarists, this may sound pointless to include, however I think it should be mentioned that slayer tune their guitars to C# on this album (or at least some of the songs), instead of E flat, which will contribute to a different sound, and represents a change in maybe style or moving in a different direction musically. I'm just not sure if they tune to "drop c#" (basically this is a possibility as they tune to e flat normally, so it would explain it) or all strings down 3 semitones which kerry king does and did in a demo he did for a guitar magazine. As I can't find a definite citation, I won't add it, but if anyone can, feel free to add it.194.46.176.174 (talk) 22:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

It's actually played in Drop-D tuning, and yes I agree that it should be added in the article, but I don't know where I would add it, though. Adam9393 (talk) 22:50, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

flat fifth (tritone) not used in medival music
actually, here is a link of a 16th century lute player, and if you look in measure 2, you will see a tritone (c to f#), even though it is not a flat fifth from the keynote (d as key signature denotes d minor) also, as the tritone that occurs naturally in d minor is e to b flat ie. iidim, it suggests that the tritone is delibirate. http://www.delcamp.net/pdf/1_renaissance/neusiedler_wascha_mesa.pdf this somewhat contradicts that statement? suggest revising?194.46.176.174 (talk) 23:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Nu Metal
This isn't Thrash Metal, it's Nu Metal. The article itself cites sources that speak of it as a Nu-Metal influenced album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.17.125.97 (talk) 03:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the majority of the sources state that it is thrash metal, and no one cares what you think. Slayer is a thrash metal band. This is a thrash metal album. It doesn't sound any different than any of Slayer's other albums. It sounds like Slayer. (Sugar Bear (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC))

 * I'd have to agree with the first guy, this is definitely a Nu Metal Album. Slayer takes more of a refined Nu Metal sound in this album than in previous ones like Hell Awaits or Seasons In The Abyss.199.107.16.119 (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

It's not really nu metal. It is more experimental, but it has a groove metal sound. TheEarthboundFan2001 (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Other album
There's another album: Diabolus in Musica (Salvatore Accardo album), so per WP:SONGDAB this should really be moved out to Diabolus in Musica (Slayer album) and redirected to Diabolus in musica dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Diablus In Musica is Slayer's seventh studio album
If you do not count Undisputed Attitude as an album, it will add up to eleven studio albums. Also, as of January 10th, 2016, it says on SLAYER.NET, the band's official website, that Repentless is their ELEVENTH studio album which leaves Undisputed Attitude out of their studio album lineup.

1. Show No Mercy 2. Hell Awaits 3. Reign In Blood 4. South Of Heaven 5. Seasons In The Abyss 6. Divine Intervention 7. Diabolus In Musica 8. God Hates Us All 9. Christ Illusion 10. World Painted Blood 11. Repentless

2602:306:8B36:D960:C865:29FC:9B06:7130 (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Diabolus in Musica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090202084633/http://www.cannabiscup.com:80/ht/entertainment/content.php?bid=130&aid=21 to http://www.cannabiscup.com/ht/entertainment/content.php?bid=130&aid=21

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Groove metal
I personally don't think it is nu metal at all. But, in the sources, it shows that there is groove metal elements. This album is definitely experimental, but it's not nu metal at all, it's just groove metal. TheEarthboundFan2001 (talk) 19:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Diabolus in Musica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://music.yahoo.com/read/interview/12030361
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930181103/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=56559 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=56559
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com/artist/279575/slayer/chart

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diabolus in Musica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66Vn4kYct?url=http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/interviews/interviews/slayers_kerry_king_weve_never_tried_to_be_anything_we_werent.html to http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/interviews/interviews/slayers_kerry_king_weve_never_tried_to_be_anything_we_werent.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

There are no sources identifying this as nu metal
The majority of sources identify this album as thrash metal. --68.185.2.34 (talk) 19:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

 * Can you please post, say the three most reliable ? -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 19:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

 * http://www.rockandmetalinmyblood.com/recensioni/slayer-diabolus-in-musica/1998-american-recordings/342/

 * https://books.google.com/books?id=UffkZCMjXzoC&pg=PT244&lpg=PT244&dq=diabolus+in+musica+thrash+metal&source=bl&ots=z8oNq3yvq7&sig=UHpOBkC10FP0Lbqrlz-FJOLPF_8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjlh6a60aDXAhUM42MKHRlCD6M4MhDoAQhbMAc#v=onepage&q=diabolus%20in%20musica%20thrash%20metal&f=false

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.185.2.34 (talk) 19:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * https://www.decibelmagazine.com/2011/03/09/justify-your-shitty-taste-slayer-s-diabolus-in-musica/

Here's one for groove metal saying this is not a nu-metal album. http://www.vh1.com/news/17265/metals-biggest-sound-departures/ 68.185.2.34 (talk) 19:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Decibel magazine also says this is not a nu-metal album. 68.185.2.34 (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with this band, I requested you to post your references to help editors who regulatory watch this page, therefore I really can not argue your point, however rockandmetalinmyblood.com and decibelmagazine.com seem to be questionable as to their reliability, but lets wait to hear from editors more familiar with this band. Thank you for your response. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 19:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

This album is mostly thrash metal with elements of groove/experimental/nu-metal. It's an oddball but it's an experiment in the thrash style. It's not accepted as a core/essential thrash metal album, at least of the 1990s, but it has its place among certain fans and I like it enough to defend its place in thrash metal. SPNKs (talk) 06:41, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Diabolus in Musica


text:
Talk:Divine Intervention (Slayer album)

Lyrics
How were the lyrics inspired by Araya's wife? Hm?--87.184.150.40 (talk) 22:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 one external links on Divine Intervention (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090909052619/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com:80/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=126433 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=126433
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091107015048/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com:80/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=129783 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=129783
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606212949/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=71555 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=71555
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/1995/02/20/arts/pop-review-death-and-madness-remain-the-basics-in-slayer-s-repertory.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060427201136/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com:80/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=46855 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=46855
 * Added tag to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=44669
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/music/artist/news/artists/8865/64522/64544
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626050454/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090412081617/http://www.cria.ca/cert_db_search.php to http://www.cria.ca/cert_db_search.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Divine Intervention (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606225912/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=3145 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=3145
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021030123911/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=2000 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=2000

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Divine Intervention (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE0D8143EF933A15751C0A963958260
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100526034945/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=130184 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=130184
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/music/artist/news/artists/8865/64522/64544

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:41, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Divine Intervention (Slayer album)


text:
Russian manual alphabet

The Russian Manual Alphabet (RMA) is used for fingerspelling in Russian Sign Language.

Like many other manual alphabets, the Russian Manual Alphabet bears similarities to the French Manual Alphabet. However, it was adapted to account for the letters of the Cyrillic alphabet found in the Russian written language. It is a one-handed alphabet. RMA includes 33 hand gestures, each of which corresponds to one letter in the Russian alphabet. There are no signs denoting punctuation or capitalization.

In 2015, researchers at the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia developed a software–hardware system that converted RMA gestures into textual form.

title: Russian manual alphabet


text:
Category:Ramsar sites

 * Ramsar sites are Wetlands on the UNESCO list of Ramsar wetlands of international importance.

title: Category:Ramsar sites


text: User talk:68.201.209.47

title: User talk:68.201.209.47


text:
Dispositio

Dispositio is the system used for the organization of arguments in the context of Western classical rhetoric. The word is Latin, and can be translated as "organization" or "arrangement".

It is the second of five canons of classical rhetoric (the first being inventio, and the remaining being elocutio, memoria, and pronuntiatio) that concern the crafting and delivery of speeches and writing.

The first part of any rhetorical exercise was to discover the proper arguments to use, which was done by the formalized methods of inventio. The next problem was to select various arguments and organize them into an effective discourse.

Aristotle
Aristotle defined two essential parts of a discourse: the statement of the case and the proof of the case. For example, in a legal argument, a prosecutor must first declare the charges against the defendant and provide the relevant facts; then he must present the evidence that proves guilt. Aristotle allowed that in practice most discourse also requires an introduction and a conclusion.

Latin rhetoric
Later writers on rhetoric, such as Cicero and Quintilian, refined this organizational scheme, so that there were eventually six parts:

 * the introduction, or exordium. In the exordium, the speaker gives their main argument, and all relevant information.
 * the statement of the case, or narratio. Quintilian explained that in the narratio "we shall for instance represent a person accused of theft as covetous, accused of adultery as lustful, accused of homicide as rash, or attribute the opposite qualities to these persons if we are defending them; further we must do the same with place, time and the like".
 * a listing of the major tenets of the argument, or divisio (sometimes known as partitio). It has two functions: to name the issues in dispute and to list the arguments to be used in the order they will appear.
 * the proof of the case, or confirmatio. It confirms or validates the material given in the narratio and partitio.
 * the refutation of possible opposing arguments, or confutatio. If the rhetor anticipates that certain people in his audience may disagree with his speech, he must be prepared to refute the argument that could possibly be presented in opposition to his original speech.
 * the conclusion, or peroratio. Cicero taught that a rhetor can do three things in this part: summarize his arguments, try to discredit anyone who disagrees with him, and arouse sympathy for himself, his clients, or his case.

While this structure might appear to be very rigid (and certainly some writers on the subject were overly pedantic), it was in practice subject to modification. Cicero and Quintilian, for example, encouraged writers to rearrange the structure when it strengthened their case: for instance, if the opposing arguments were known to be powerful, it might be better to state the refutation before the proof.

Within each major part, there were additional tactics that might be employed. For instance, a prosecutor might summarize his case with forceful repetition of his main tenets using a technique known as accumulatio. The defense attorney in the same case might use a different method for his summation.

Finally, dispositio was also considered an iterative process, particularly in conjunction with inventio. The very process of organizing arguments might result in the need to discover and research new ones. An orator would refine his arguments and their organization until they were arranged properly. He would then proceed to those topics that are generally associated with rhetoric presently—the development of the style and delivery of the arguments.

Exordium
The exordium (meaning "beginning" in Latin; from exordiri, meaning "to begin") was the introductory portion of an oration. The term is Latin and the Greek equivalent was termed the proem or prooimion.

In the exordium, the orator states the purpose of the discourse. In doing this, they need to consider several things:

 * What kind of cause is he presenting? For instance, is it an honorable cause (defense of a hero) or a dishonorable one (defense of a murderer)?
 * Should a direct beginning be favoured, or should the beginning be more subtle and indirect?
 * In what manner ought the speaker to proceed (e.g., humorously or seriously)?
 * The speaker should introduce their own character or credentials, so as to make the audience predisposed to believing their arguments.
 * If required, or possible, the speaker might also question the character or credentials of his opponent.
 * Lastly, the speaker must avoid certain faults in the introduction. For example, this excerpt from the Roman Rhetorica ad Herennium lists several faults:

In the Introduction of a cause we must make sure that our style is temperate and that the words are in current use, so that the discourse seems unprepared. An Introduction is faulty if it can be applied as well to a number of causes; that is called a banal Introduction. Again, an Introduction which the adversary can use no less well is faulty, and that is called a common Introduction. That Introduction, again, is faulty which the opponent can turn to his own use against you. And again that is faulty which has been composed in too laboured a style, or is too long; and that which does not appear to have grown out of the cause itself in such a way to have an intimate connection with the Statement of Facts; and, finally, that which fails to make the hearer well disposed or receptive or attentive.
 * —Rhetorica ad Herennium, I. vii, 11, trans. Harry Caplan, Loeb Classical Library, 1954.)

In short, the exordium was the portion of the discourse in which the orator would prepare the audience to hear his arguments in a favorable mindset. "An exordium can serve different kinds of functions in the differing species of rhetoric, but in all of them some of the major themes of the coming discourse will be announced in advance".

Peroratio
The peroratio ("peroration"), as the final part of a speech, had two main purposes in classical rhetoric: to remind the audience of the main points of the speech (recapitulatio) and to influence their emotions (affectus). The role of the peroration was defined by Greek writers on rhetoric, who termed it epilogos; but it is most often associated with Roman orators, who made frequent use of emotional appeals. A famous example was the speech of Marcus Antonius in defence of Aquillius, during which Antonius tore open the tunic of Aquillius to reveal his battle scars.

During the first century B.C. it was common for two or more speakers to appear on each side in major court cases. In such cases it was considered an honour to be asked to deliver the peroration.

title: Dispositio


text:
Talk:Iritis

Comments
In my opinion, the iritis article should not be considered a stub anymore. If nobody is against this, I shall remove the stub section in three days. --Vincent1208 08:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

There needs to be clarification about iritis versus Iridocyclitis. I have added some info I found. Rakerman 01:11, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Someone who's good at wiki may want to add that it is possible to get iritis in both eyes at the same time. Nothing in the atricle suggests this.82.71.39.106 (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

=
Hi Iritis can be caused by Auto Immune hepitaitis, a problem of white cell? counts? I also find another article at http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/05/health/womenshealth/05novak.html?_r=0 interesting. Could some one write about Ato Immune Hepitatis (which already affected the liver and under contorl with drugs now affecting as iritis in both eyes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.119.148 (talk) 10:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Redirect to Uveitis
Iridocyclitis, iritis, cyclitis are all other names for uveitis and because the page uveitis is more comprehensive (and includes this page) and I redirected this page to the page uveitis.Kiatdd (talk) 00:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * -since 2005 classification of uveitis is according to SUN (standardization of uveitis) workgroup, see abstract and description. The contents of the page seems to be about "anterior uveitis", even in that case the contents are unfortunately incorrect, for example where is FHI, HLA-27,etc. Graves, malignancies, toxoplasma, toxocara,etc have nothing to do with iritis. Besides, anterior uveitis is not usually discussed separately and the page anterior uveitis is redirected to uveitis by previous editors. The reason is that due to overlapping, all uveitis syndromes are discussed together not separately. I will copy the images&links&references to uveitis in the next couple of days. It is okay if you disagree, just leave a comment here so that we can discuss. Kiatdd (talk) 03:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * By summarily redirecting the article, you have essentially "removed" the visible content from Wikipedia by not adequately merging the content into the Uveitis article. There is a signifcant amount of information in the original Iritis article (e.g. treatment options and and reasoning/purpose) that is not reflected in Uveitis. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 00:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Agree! "Iritis" currently does not appear in google search results but "anterior iritis" and "anterior uveitis" are redirected to "uveitis, the page content as you can see in the page's history is covered in depth in the article uveitis, I have no idea whether we can have a little medical error in exchange for some google traffic but a short page like a dictionary entry or a disambiguation seems fine to me, what's your suggestion? Kiatdd (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Iritis


text:
Chataway

Chataway is a surname, and may refer to:

 * Christopher Chataway (1931–2014) British runner and politician
 * Gertrude Chataway (1866–1951), friend of the author Lewis Carroll
 * James Chataway (1852–1901), Australian politician
 * John Chataway (1947–2004), Canadian politician
 * Thomas Drinkwater Chataway (1864–1925), Australian politician, brother of Gertrude and James

title: Chataway


text:
User:Edward/On this day/1950-4

From http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/

title: User:Edward/On this day/1950-4


text:
Emerald Coast

The Emerald Coast is an unofficial name for the coastal area in the US state of Florida on the Gulf of Mexico that stretches about 100 mi through five counties, Escambia, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, and Bay, which include Pensacola Beach, Navarre Beach, Fort Walton Beach, Destin, and Panama City Beach. Some south Alabama communities on the coast of Baldwin County, such as Gulf Shores, Orange Beach, and Fort Morgan embrace the term as well.

Origin of term
Beginning in 1946, for marketing purposes the coast from Fort Walton Beach to Panama City was named the "Playground of the Gulf Coast", as witnessed by the name of the Fort Walton Beach newspaper, the Playground News, later the Playground Daily News, and now the Northwest Florida Daily News.

In 1952, this stretch of coast was dubbed the "Miracle Strip" by Claude Jenkins, a local journalist. The term was reflected in the former Miracle Strip Amusement Park, its successor Miracle Strip at Pier Park and other local businesses. The name "Miracle Strip" was officially adopted by 35 officials and members of three district Florida Motor Courts Association chapters on March 14, 1956, at a meeting held at the Staff Restaurant in Fort Walton Beach, for the 100-mile stretch of scenic Highway 98's "fabulous string of motels, hotels and nightspots" from Pensacola to Panama City. Members included representatives of local chambers of commerce.

According to the Daily News, the term Emerald Coast was coined in 1983 by a junior high school student, Andrew Dier, who won $50 in the contest for a new area slogan. Since then, the term has been expanded by popular usage to cover all of the northwest coast of Florida from Pensacola Beach to Panama City Beach.

The area and particularly the beaches along the Emerald Coast from Pensacola to Panama City are also referred to as the "Redneck Riviera", alluding to the strong Southern culture of the hinterland. The Flora-Bama in Perdido Key at the Alabama border is a bar and music venue with a diverse Southern clientele. Popular vacation destinations include Panama City, Pensacola, Pensacola Beach, Gulf Breeze, Navarre, Navarre Beach, Fort Walton Beach, Niceville, WaterColor, Panama City Beach, Destin, and Seaside, a planned community whose iconic pastel-paint and tin-roof construction was made famous in the Jim Carrey movie The Truman Show, filmed in the area from 1996–1997. Other communities on the Emerald Coast are Perdido Key, Sandestin, Mexico Beach, Grayton Beach, Inlet Beach, and Santa Rosa Beach.

The area is a family drive destination, attracting tourists from across the Southern United States due to its close proximity. The Emerald Coast is a three-hour drive east of New Orleans. In the first decade of the 21st century, the popularity of the Emerald Coast expanded greatly, leading to new construction and rapid growth. Many development communities similar to Seaside sprang up in the southern part of Walton County and at the western end of Panama City Beach, raising property values.

Deep-sea fishing is an area attraction, with Destin holding the nickname "World's Luckiest Fishing Village" (and several saltwater world records) and Panama City Beach hosting the annual high-dollar Bay Point Billfish Invitational. The area has many seafood restaurants.

On 15 October 2019, the Okaloosa Board of County Commissioners approved a new “destination logo” that the Tourist Development Council had recommended, to be introduced in the TDC's new marketing campaign beginning in January 2020. The “Emerald Coast” will be dropped for a simplified logo reading Destin Fort Walton Beach, Florida. This aligns with the renaming of the Northwest Florida Regional Airport to the Destin–Fort Walton Beach Airport in February 2015.

Military bases
This part of Florida is home to numerous military bases, with installations including Naval Air Station Pensacola (home of the Navy's Blue Angels demonstration team and the initial training site for all naval aviators), Hurlburt Field, Eglin Air Force Base (one of the largest military bases in America), Tyndall Air Force Base, Coastal Systems Station-Naval Surface Warfare Center (home to the Navy Experimental Diving Unit and Naval Diving & Salvage Training Center), and Corry Station Naval Technical Training Center. Two other military bases, Duke Field and Naval Air Station Whiting Field are also in the area but are located inland from the coast.

In popular culture
The well-established military presence in the region has led to many film appearances, the earliest being the practice takeoff runs by Doolittle Raiders for Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo, shot at Peel Field, an auxiliary field at Eglin Field, in 1944. Some scenes in the 1949 film Twelve O'Clock High, another film about World War II, were also shot at Eglin.

The 1972 eco-horror film Frogs was filmed in Walton County, Florida, in and around the Wesley House, an old Southern mansion located in Eden Gardens State Park in the town of Point Washington, situated on Tucker Bayou off Choctawhatchee Bay.

Exterior shots and several interior scenes for 1998's The Truman Show were filmed in Seaside.

The 1998 Sega Dreamcast game Sonic Adventure features a level called Emerald Coast.

The majority of scenes for Jaws 2 (1978) were filmed in the region, in the Navarre area. Interiors for the youth's pinball hang-out were filmed in Fort Walton Beach at the now-razed original location of Hog's Breath Saloon on Okaloosa Island, and Bruce the Shark's control sled was placed on the bottom of the Gulf off Navarre Beach and the mainland community of Navarre.

"Redneck Riviera" is the title of a song by Tom T. Hall (from his 1996 album Songs from Sopchoppy) about this region and the nearby Forgotten Coast. The song's lyrics include:
 * Gulf Shores up through Apalachicola
 * They got beaches of the whitest sand
 * Nobody cares if Grandma's got a tattoo
 * Or Bubba's got a hot wing in his hand

Parts of John Grisham's book The Whistler (2016) take place in and around the Emerald Coast.

title: Emerald Coast


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy the duck

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:52, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Roy_the_duck
advertisement for a non-notable website
 * Delete not even domain-level. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 02:35, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertisement and non-encyclopedic Benuski 02:46, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just an ad. And the web site does not even have its own separate domain name. Zzyzx11 06:10, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Talk:Der Judenstaat

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment
Hertzl opposed the efforts already made by Zionist groups to settle Jews in Ottoman-controlled Palestine, arguing that "important experiments in colonization have been made, though on the mistaken principle of a gradual infiltration of Jews. An infiltration is bound to end badly. It continues till the inevitable moment when the native population feels itself threatened, and forces the government to stop a further influx of Jews. Immigration is consequently futile unless we have the sovereign right to continue such immigration.” (Quoted from The Jewish State, translated by Sylvie d’Avigdor, Nutt, London, 1896, and reprinted by Dover, 1988, p. 95.) Which the state of Israel now has and so continue the process of colonization through the construction of "settlements" or what is really just a nice way of saying colonies. WTF? I deleted this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.209.162 (talk) 10:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Eretz Yisrael
". . . in the realization of a Jewish state in Eretz Yisrael."

I find the use of "Eretz Yisrael" in the context to be highly biased. Eretz Yisrael is a name used by a certain group of people, and the Jewish state was established in the occupied fragment of the Ottoman Empire. It would be appropriate to mention that many Jews called the land "Eretz Israel," but I don't think it is appropriate to begin the article using the term as if it was a proper objective description of the land where Israel was established. The article is *about* a book that is related to foundation of Zionism, but the article should be written from an objective and not Zionist perspective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.68.252 (talk) 19:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Review and criticism ?
Why is there no section dealing with literary review and criticism, and none for political criticism ? The book is definitely controversial. ♆ CUSH ♆ 17:51, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Vandals Removed Content
Restore removed content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.23.47.69 (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Exact translation of title
The article currently starts with, but this is wrong. Der Staat der Juden is German for "The Jews' State". Der Judenstaat literally means "The Jew State". This might seem like a minor nitpick, but when Wikipedia says "literally", it should be precise. Gabbe (talk) 09:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Yes, I had made an edit that reflected this previously at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Der_Judenstaat&oldid=644744077, but someone changed it to "Jew's state" in a later edit.

185.31.142.251 (talk) 17:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Link problem
The citation link, currently #8, to the English translation of Der Judenstaat at gutenberg.org leads to Error 404 though that in External links leads to the download page. Mcljlm (talk) 17:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Fixed. Freelance-frank (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Der Judenstaat


text:
Talk:Mamallapuram

Untitled
I don't get it. The photo was taken by "a friend" in 2001, the earthquake happened in 2004. -- user:zanimum

Unrelated external link in page
I cannot understand the relation of this external link "http://www.pariharam.com For Temples around Mahabalipuram" in the Mahabalipuram page. If it is really related, please post your comments before adding it in the page.--bkris 17:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Mamallapuram is the correct name and not Mahabalipuram. In http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamallapuram. Nowadays only it is called Mahabalipuram. If you have any doubt ask any tamil expert.

Question
Does anyone know if Mahabalipuram was known about Before the tsunami? The article says it was swallowed by the sea a few hundred years ago....wouldn't there be some kind of record in either Indian History or maybe even from Colonial History depending on when it vanished....

 * It's been known about for 2,000 years. The tsunami just exposed a few parts of a possible temple. The area has been a staple of tourism in South India for over a century and for pilrimage for two millennia. Inter lingua  talk 03:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

HD clip of Mahabalipuram encoded in H.264
Hello, I've put up a 403MiB HD clip I shot using an HDR-HC1 of Mahabalipuram at this link. I'd like to have it pointed to from the article page. Will do so if no one responds to this entry in a couple of days. (Veliath 15:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC))

I've gone aheaded and edited in the link. (Veliath 04:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC))

Graham Hancock
Underwater remains of temples off the coast of Mahabalipuram have been researched by Graham Hancock and his team of marine archaeologists who puts an approximate period of construction of the temples at 7,000 years back or more. Would the Archaeological Survey of India want to take notice of the same? 193.220.87.134 09:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Image with copyright info
Is it good to have a photo with copyright info on it published in wiki? If I am not wrong, please replace the main photo or trim off the copyright information. ponnambalamwell known as santhosh janardhanan 11:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Mahabalipuram is the old name and no longer exist
The name of Mahabalipuram has been changed to Mamallapuram Officially... So it is not proper to mention it as Mahabalipuram —Preceding unsigned comment added by Balajijagadesh (talk • contribs) 05:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mahabalipuram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305214902/http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2425/stories/20080104242506600.htm to http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2425/stories/20080104242506600.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

"Mahabalipuram(Tamil Nadu)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mahabalipuram(Tamil Nadu) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

what is mahabalipuram famous for
what is mahabalipuram famous for 122.174.50.125 (talk) 04:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mamallapuram


text:
User talk:Ted Wilkes

Fair use rationale for File:ButtermilkHorse.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ButtermilkHorse.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

File:NickAdams-deathcertificate.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:NickAdams-deathcertificate.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ThiefofBagdadFairbanks.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ThiefofBagdadFairbanks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WilbertHarrison.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:WilbertHarrison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:DevilDiverwithGeorgeWoolfUp.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DevilDiverwithGeorgeWoolfUp.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Annie Réval

The article Annie Réval has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Article has been tagged for over a year but remains unreferenced and no evidence provided or found that the subject meets the notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 10:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Clint Walker.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clint Walker.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 20:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you might want to comment on this matter at the discussion site. The photo is a Warner Bros publicity photo of Clint Walker, and the no-free fair use reflects that fact. Marcd30319 (talk) 21:32, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Wall Street has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for May 2011
Wall Street, a page you edited has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for May 2011. We encourage you to participate in improving this article. You can also vote for next months article of the Month here. --Kumioko (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:IdleHourFarm.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IdleHourFarm.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BlueHawaiiElvis.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:BlueHawaiiElvis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JackandMaryBenny.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:JackandMaryBenny.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 20:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NortherDancerBookcover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:NortherDancerBookcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Moore-LoneRanger.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Moore-LoneRanger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Michaelstraight.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Michaelstraight.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WhitneyStaightBrooklands.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:WhitneyStaightBrooklands.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:77SunsetStripAlbumcover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:77SunsetStripAlbumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Girlsgirlsgirls (DVD cover).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Girlsgirlsgirls (DVD cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Huac.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Huac.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Booker Prize winners
Category:Booker Prize winners, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

File:HootGibson.jpg
The two wiki pages that use this picture list both 1920 and 1940 for the picture date. Can you verify when this picture was taken and update the pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skoot13 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GIBluesElvis.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:GIBluesElvis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:VivaLasVegasElvis.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:VivaLasVegasElvis.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:FrankieandJohnnyElvis.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:FrankieandJohnnyElvis.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ChangeofHabitElvis.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:ChangeofHabitElvis.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TroublewithgirlsElvis.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:TroublewithgirlsElvis.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Marguerite Chapman.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Marguerite Chapman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:40, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:American Theatre Hall of Fame inductees
Category:American Theatre Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 04:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ginger Alden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ginger Alden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ginger Alden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:EarlCarrollTheatre-NYC.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EarlCarrollTheatre-NYC.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Vzeebjtf (talk) 10:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Booker Prize winners
Category:Booker Prize winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lavardin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lavardin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:38, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

National Cowgirl Museum and Hall of Fame
Thank you for creating the National Cowgirl Museum and Hall of Fame. I will try to add more inline references; would you care to help as well? Ideally, I believe every inductee should have a page, but that is too much work for me right now.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

A.S.M. Hutchinson listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A.S.M. Hutchinson. Since you had some involvement with the A.S.M. Hutchinson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:ThomasWLamont-1929Timemagazine.jpg
Does the original cover/magazine give a credit line for this cover? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jailhouse rock (fighting style)

The article Jailhouse rock (fighting style) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "The Jailhouse rock as a fighting style is not has reliable sources, it has cites references which are not included."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrPoglum (talk) 08:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion
Category:Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 23:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:VictoriaForde.jpg

The file File:VictoriaForde.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:DuncanUpshawFletcher.jpg

The file File:DuncanUpshawFletcher.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ChetConklin1916.jpg

The file File:ChetConklin1916.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Jpmcgowanbookcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jpmcgowanbookcover.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jpmcgowanbookcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jpmcgowanbookcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:GraceKing.gif

The file File:GraceKing.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MarshallNeilan1920.jpg

The file File:MarshallNeilan1920.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carla Maffioletti

A tag has been placed on Carla Maffioletti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.carlamaffioletti.com/bio/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Smerus (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smileyburnette.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Smileyburnette.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ElvisPresleyAlohafromHawaii.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ElvisPresleyAlohafromHawaii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

File:HootGibson.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HootGibson.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Bungle (talk • contribs) 12:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Theklansmanfilm.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Theklansmanfilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FerdinandEberstadtbookcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FerdinandEberstadtbookcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ted Wilkes