text:
Behavior modification facility

A behavior modification facility (or youth residential program) is a residential educational and treatment institution enrolling adolescents who are perceived as displaying antisocial behavior, in an attempt to alter their conduct.

Due to irregular licensing rules across countries and states, as well as ambiguity regarding the labels that facilities use themselves, it is hard to gauge how widespread the facilities are. The facilities are part of what has been called the Troubled Teen Industry. Programs in the United States have been controversial due to widespread allegations of abuse and trauma imposed on the adolescents who are enrolled, as well as deceptive marketing practices aimed at parents. Critics say the facilities do not use evidence-based treatments.

Methodologies used in such programs
Practices and service quality in such program vary greatly. The behavior modification methodologies used vary, but a combination of positive and negative reinforcement is typically used. Often these methods are delivered in a contingency management format such as a point system or level system. Such methodology has been found to be highly effective in the treatment of disruptive disorders (see meta-analysis of Chen & Ma (2007).

Positive reinforcement mechanisms include points, rewards and signs of status, while punishment procedures may include time-outs, point deductions, reversal of status, prolonged stays at a facility, physical restraint, or even corporal punishment. Research showed that time out length was not a factor and suggestions were made to limit time out to five minute durations. A newer approach uses graduated sanctions. Staff appear easily trained in behavioral intervention, such training is maintained and does lead to improved consumer outcomes, as well as reduce turn over. More restrictive punishment procedures in general are less appealing to staff and administrators.

Behavioral programs were found to lessen the need for medication. Several studies have found that gains made in residential treatment programs are maintained from 1–5 years post discharge. Therapeutic boarding schools are boarding schools based on the therapeutic community model that offers an educational program together with specialized structure and supervision for students with emotional and behavioral problems, substance abuse problems, or learning difficulties. Some schools are accredited as Residential treatment centers.

Behavioral residential treatment became so popular in the 1970s and 1980s that a journal was formed called Behavioral Residential Treatment, which later changed its name to Behavioral Interventions. The journal continues to be published today.

History
In the late 1960s, behavior modification or practice referred to as applied behavior analysis began to move rapidly into residential treatment facilities. The goal was to redesign the behavioral architecture around delinquent teens to lessen chances of recidivism and improve academics. Harold Cohen and James Filipczak (1971) published a book hailing the successes of such programs in doubling learning rates and reducing recidivism. This book even contained an introduction from the leading behaviorist at the time, B.F. Skinner hailing the achievements. Independent analysis of multiple sites with thousands of adolescents found behavior modification to be more effective than treatment as usual, a therapeutic milieu, and as effective as more psychologically intense programs such as transactional analysis with better outcomes on behavioral measures; however, these authors found that behavior modification was more prone to leading to poor relationships with the clients. Over time, interest faded in Cohen's CASE project. Other studies found that in proper supervision of staff in behavior modification facilities could lead to greater use of punishment procedures.

Under the leadership of Montrose Wolf, Achievement place, the first Teaching Family Home became the prototype for behavioral programs. Achievement place opened in 1967. Each home has from 6-8 boys in it with two "parents" trained in behavior modification principles. The token system for the program was divided into 3 levels. Outcome studies have found that Achievement place and other teaching family homes reduce recidivism and increase pro-social behavior, as well as self-esteem. While initial research suggested the effects of the program only lasted for one year post discharge, recent review of the data suggests the program lasts longer in effect.

Gradually, behavior modification /applied behavior analysis within the penal system including residential facilities for delinquent youth lost popularity in the 1970s-1980s due to a large number of abuses (see Cautilli & Weinberg (2007) ), but recent trends in the increase in U.S. crime and recent focus on reduction of recidivism have given such programs a second look. Indeed, because of societal needs the number of youth residential facilities has grown over recent years to close to 39,950 in 2000. The use of functional analysis has been shown to be teachable to staff and able to reduce use of punishment procedures. Rutherford's (2009) review from interviews and archival materials documents the decline from treatment of  behavior analysis with criminal justice populations.

These facilities are part of what has been described as the Troubled Teen Industry.

Some model programs
Studies of successful graduates have shown that boot camp programs as an alternative to prison time are particularly successful in reducing criminality, but these studies are limited to successful graduates of state correctional and prison-alternative programs managed by current and former military service members. Programs such as teaching family homes based on the Teaching-Family Model have been researched by industry funded organizations and show positive gains. Research shows that they can be used to reduce delinquency while adolescents are in the home and post release {see Kingsley (2006). In general, these types of programs take a behavioral engineering approach to reducing problem behavior and building skills.

In general, behavior modification programs, including military style boot camps that follow modern curriculum, that are used in facilities or in the natural environment have a large effect size and lead to an estimated 15 to 40% reduction in recidivism. While this reduction appears to be modest, it holds potential in the U.S. given the large number of people in the prison system. Increasingly, behavior modification models based on the principles of applied behavior analysis, cognitive behavioral therapy, and dialectic behavioral therapy are being developed to model and reduce delinquency and are being integrated into programs of all types.

Controversy
This industry is not without controversy, however. The U.S. Surgeon General (1999) discussed the need to clarify admission criteria to residential treatment programs. Included in the same report was the call for more updated research as most of the residential research had been completed in the 1960s and 1970s. .  Disability rights organizations, such as the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, oppose placement in such programs and call into question the appropriateness and efficacy of such group placements, the failure of such programs to address problems in the child's home and community environment, the limited or no mental health services offered and substandard educational programs.

Bazelon promotes community-based services on the basis that it considers more effective and less costly than residential placement. While the behavior modification programs can be delivered as easily in residential programs as in community-based programs overall community-based programs continue to lack empirical support especially with respect to long term outcomes for severe cases with the notable exception of Hinckley and Ellis (1985). Even with this said, in 1999 the surgeon general clearly stated "...it is premature to endorse the effectiveness of residential treatment for adolescents.".

From late 2007 through 2008, a broad coalition of grass roots efforts, prominent medical and psychological organizations that including members of Alliance for the Safe, Therapeutic and Appropriate use of Residential Treatment (ASTART) and the Community Alliance for the Ethical Treatment of Youth (CAFETY), provided testimony and support that led to the creation of the Stop Child Abuse in Residential Programs for Teens Act of 2008 by the United States Congress Committee on Education and Labor.

Jon Martin-Crawford and Kathryn Whitehead of CAFETY testified at a hearing of the United States Congress Committee on Education and Labor on April 24, 2008, where they described abusive practices they had experienced at the Family Foundation School and Mission Mountain School, both therapeutic boarding schools.

One recent acknowledgement has been that long term care does not equate with better outcomes. To reduce the tendency for abuse, a strong push has occurred to certify or license behavior modifiers or to have such practices limited to licensed psychologists. In particular psychologists with behavioral training American psychological association offers a diplomat (post Ph.D. and licensed certification) in behavioral psychology.

Often the practice of behavior modification in facilities comes into question (see recent interest in Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Aspen Education Group and the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools). Often these types of restrictive issues are discussed as part of ethical and legal standards (see Professional practice of behavior analysis). Recent research has identified some best practices for use in such facilities In general policies in such facilities require the presence of a treatment team to ensure that abuses do not occur especially if facilities are attempting to use punishment programs.

Regulations
In the U.S. residential treatment programs are all monitored at the state level and many are JACHO accredited. States vary in requirements to open such centers. Due to the absence of regulation of these programs by the federal government and because many are not subject to state licensing or monitoring, the Federal Trade Commission has issued a guide for parents considering such placement. Due to irregular licensing practices and differences in the kinds of labels that facilities use themselves, it is unclear how many facilities exist in the United States.

Organizations
Residential therapist who are behavior modifiers should join professional organizations and be professionally affiliated. Many organizations exist for behavior therapists around the world. The World Association for Behavior Analysis offers a certification in behavior therapy In the United States, the American Psychological Association's Division 25 is the division for behavior analysis. The Association for Contextual Behavior Therapy is another professional organization. ACBS is home to many clinicians with specific interest in third generation behavior therapy. The Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (formerly the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy) is for those with a more cognitive orientation. Internationally, most behavior therapists find a core intellectual home in the International Association for Behavior Analysis (ABA:I).

title: Behavior modification facility


text:
Talk:Gay skinhead

Votes for deletion results
This page was listed on votes for deletion. Please see Votes for deletion/Gay skinheads for the results of the debate. -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:41, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite per comments in Vote for Deletion
I urge all interested parties to review this page, especially anyone who has read Gay Skins: Class, Masculinity, and Queer Appropriation. I wrote from what I could glean via gay skinhead web sites, and from personal experience in the non-gay skinhead community, but I'm no expert. I was mainly trying to define what makes it a distinct sub-subculture, and to incorporate suggestions from the VfD discussion (including wikifying the title to singular, and I fixed the double-redirects and template).

Kappa points out that "Gayskin" receives many more Google hits than "Gay skinhead". Is it wise to re-move it to "Gayskin"? Will that harm the edit history? (I'm kind of new to WP.) Unconventional 07:01, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Generally, articles should be under the most commonly used name in English. (There are some exceptions and qualifications to that principle, but I doubt they apply here.) So if Gayskin is the most common name, go ahead and move the article. As long as the double redirects get fixed, it won't hurt anything. If you'd like help, or if you want me to move the article for you, let me know. Jonathunder 03:26, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)

Being a (straight) skinhead myself I'd like to add into consideration that most straight skins dislike only gayskins who are only into the fetish side, or only claim skin for protection. Skins who simply happen to be gay, but are skins for the true purpose of working class protest, are not usually looked down on. Perhaps that should be added to this entry. -Tony

 * Being a bisexual skinhead, and working class, I'd like to dispute the "true purpose" of skinhead: working class protest is a misapplied and unneeded justification. Skinhead is a style movement predicated on working-class values of group identity, exclusivity, authenticity and self-validation. Dressing skinhead for protection is a perfectly valid motivation, if the other cardinal values are respected. Being a self-validating membership, the extent to which one individual exerts their own personality within that group will determine to what extent they can get away with style innovations. Thus, brogue boots are one thing, and Rangers another, and though appropriate to different variants of the Skinhead look, only rarely would they crossover with success; but rigger's boots or Reeboks are beyond the pale. The (perceived)willingness of gay skinheads to put up with style illiteracy is principally what dedicated skins dislike about them, outside of those who are simply prejudiced.

 * Incidentally, I have never found the conjoined gayskin to be current either among gay skins or skinheads in general. In fact, gay (and bi) skins tend to think of themselves primarily as skinheads. While this is undoubtedly no more than a description of sexual interest for some (like Bear), it is still a form of group identity with its own claims to authenticity.
 * Nuttyskin 01:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Wow, is it just me or is this is just a really really bad article? I mean, really?  Why can't gay skinheads just be "skinheads who happen to be gay" rather than people who chose to live a certain aesthetic and culture because they 'fetishize' it?  I'd be pretty certain they choose the fashion, the friends, the style, the music because they GENUINELY like it, not because they get some sexual thrill out of it. We don't make the same comments about heterosexual skinheads and surely they make the aesthetic choices of wearing skinhead related fashions and being attracted to people who wear the same similar fashions, girls in chelseas, etc. etc.? Centerone (talk) 02:55, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

 * We don't make the same comments about straight skinheads, even though they and gay skinheads are not infrequently exactly the same individuals. Insistence on labels like gay and straight are misleading us in the issue: many skins are MSM, like guys in every other sector of society. Unlike Bears, same-sex attracted skinheads are much less likely to be open about their sexuality, consequently they have a much lower profile, are much less visible. The only ones who are visible are the fetish skins, usually openly gay guys who like the look but usually have little sense of style, and who are actually the minority.
 * Nuttyskin (talk) 18:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * By MSM I assume you mean Men who have sex with men? I can't speak for your experience, but I do know out gay skins who are and have long been openly accepted by their local skinhead community, and are definitely into all aspects of the culture and style, and not just 'fetish skins'. I'm not sure I understand the point you are trying to make.  You say the only ones who are visible are the fetish skins, yet I have never encountered a 'fetish skin' nor seen any genuine example of an actual person expressing such an interest.  For that matter, this article is pretty much uncited and the one 'see also' of Nicky Crane surely was well-entrenched in skinhead culture, albeit neo-nazi skin culture.. but he certainly wasn't there just for some fetishization of the culture and style. Centerone (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry if the intention and direction of my argument wasn't clear. I do not doubt there are openly gay skinheads who are accepted by other skinheads in their local area - I am glad of this, and wish them well in it; but it has not been my experience. The best I have seen is skinheads whose sexual activity with other men is an open secret: not commented upon, and certainly not "open" in the usual sense, but accepted tacitly. More usually, I find that skinheads have to meet and socialise in an entirely different city from their home turf in order to feel comfortable.
 * Fetish skins, whom some disparage, are thus often the only visible portion of the population. In the 1990s, when the skinhead look was briefly in more widespread vogue on the gay scene, fetish skins began to emerge (the Channel Four documentary Skin Complex, in which Nicky Crane outed himself, must be cited as blowing the scene wide open) and public attention was thus also directed upon genuine skinheads (i.e., those not "dressing up" in the style as if in costume) involved in same-sex activity. Skinheads who are gay must thus be distinguished from people who wear skinhead clothing primarily as a fetish activity. They are clearly not the same thing. However, I wouldn't target fetish skins as a despised group within gay skinheads: arguably, someone who begins by wearing the style in a fetish manner might plausibly become authenticised by the similarity of their experience to that of "lifestyle" skins.
 * Nuttyskin (talk) 17:42, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you know whether the Out/Skin Complex documentary is available online somewhere like youtube or vimeo? It would be good to be able to view the source material.  If it's not online.. do you know anybody who might have it on videotape whom might be able to make it available for viewing?  It doesn't seem to be commercially available.Centerone (talk) 18:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I've been able to find two YouTube videos called Skinhead OUT! Part 1 and Skinhead OUT! Part 2, posted by one hazrob (who mostly posts videos about chest waders), which certainly looks like the Channel Four documentary I remember (and it's amazing how much I do remember - mind you, I must've watched it on video dozens of times); the Parts designate which bit was broadcast before or after the ad break. Hope this helps.
 * Nuttyskin (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Wow, what a piece of... typical tabloid television that hypes something in a sensationalist way, but says little to nothing.  This doesn't actually prove as far as I'm concerned that there really is a significant community of people who dress in skinhead fashion only because of some fetish.  Yes, there are homosexual and bisexual skinheads as there are homosexuals and bisexuals in any other community.  This article continues to be without any real references.  I continue to believe this either needs to be completely rewritten, or deleted. Centerone (talk) 08:05, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * With respect to your opinion, this article does not actually posit a significant community of people who dress in skinhead fashion only because of some fetish, but a subgroup who are variously so designated, or dismissed; as well as that number who, as you rightly say, happen to have a particular sexuality in addition to being (authentically) skinheads.
 * Nuttyskin (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * At the perspective of ten years on from my last comment, the point I would make is that the gay skinhead subculture has developed (I would say, degenerated) to become a fully fetish one, an offshoot of Bears, Leathermen and coincident with the fetishisation of chavs (which is really part of class fetishism, a blend of Commodity fetishism and Racial fetishism).
 * There is boot fetishism, as one might expect; and the occasional wearing of clothing from Rubber and PVC fetishism. But a virtually uniform adoption of Dr. Martens 20-hole boots (or similar, as the quality of Docs has really gone to the wall), and (a subset of Bears/Leathermen) the very widespread adoption of beards and facial hair. Sideburns were always acceptable as skinhead styling; and small, neat moustaches, very rarely. But beards are completely alien in the context of the skinhead look, and have set a dividing line, an uncrossable Rubicon, between the appearance of a gay skinhead as opposed to any other. This may in part be due to the greater freedom of gay men, no longer feeling they have to conceal their identity behind a costume. But, if one is prepared to dilute that identity with totally unrelated elements from elsewhere, why pretend to be a skinhead at all?
 * Nuttyskin (talk) 16:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I think you might have missed the point I was making. Even 10 years ago, it seemed that the only references we had for this article were rooted in fetishism, AND they were not terribly good journalism but were more like tabloid pablum. As hazrob's YT channel is gone due to copyright issues, it's hard to exactly remember, but I'm pretty sure I was pointing out those videos you referenced were tabloid nonsense also centered around fetishism and sensationalism - all references to his channel that one can find now make it clear that hazrob's motivation was one of fetishism. I'm not denigrating sexual subcultures. We definitely should have articles about different sexual subcultures, activities, and fetishes. However, as a serious article on skinheads who happen to be gay the topic of the article itself seems to be non-notable or at very least without any significant details or good citatons, and if anything it would seemingly denigrate skinheads who happen to be gay by giving a false impression that the primary reason they do it is largely motivated by an erotic interest in gear, sexual, and fetish interests, which clearly isn't true.  As such, I still believe the article is pointless and without merit. Centerone (talk) 05:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Subcultures that aren't skinheads
By definition, if someone is a scooterboy, casual or mod, that person is not a skinhead. Those subcultures are related to skinheads, but they are different. So logically, a gay skinhead cannot be a a scooterboy, casual or mod. If he identifies as a member of one of those subcultures, he is not a skinhead. Spylab 02:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The terms scooterboy, casual, mod and even skinhead were originally applied from outside by non-members of those subcultures, often in a sneering tone. Frequently even now scooterboys, casuals, mods and skinheads attend similar events, and can often be seen together, and it can be difficult to tell one subgroup from another, even as an informed insider. Certainly scooter boys can be indistinguishable from skinheads. Whereas, a person's sexuality is not a style decision. A member of any of these subcultures might be gay or bi, but probably on the side and not as public knowledge. So a scooter boy who is also a gay skinhead is perfectly possible.

 * Just realised my comment comes seven years after yours. Is that a record?
 * Nuttyskin (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Photo Caption/Diety
I think the caption of the current photo which references "one with a devil-like tattoo" could be improved. Does anybody know which deity and which culture or religion the tattoo represents? Centerone (talk) 07:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

 * That tattoo is irrelevant to the topic of the article, so I deleted that detail from the caption.Spylab (talk) 03:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

LGBT hip hop?
Is this even a thing? And what did anyone think was its relevance to gay skinheads? I would suggest that most skinheads, never mind their sexuality, would not touch hip hop of any variety with a ten-foot pole. Nuttyskin (talk) 01:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Gayskinheadkiss.jpg

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Gay skinhead


text:
Pierre Max Dubois

Pierre Max Dubois, sometimes given as Pierre-Max Dubois (1 March 1930 – 29 August 1995) was a French composer of classical music, conductor, and music educator. He was a student of Darius Milhaud, and though not widely popular, was respected. He brought the ideas of Les Six, of which his instructor was a member, into the mid-1900s. This group called for a fresh artistic perspective on music. The music of Dubois is characteristically light hearted with interesting harmonic and melodic textures.

Life and career
Born in Graulhet in the Tarn department of Southern France, Pierre Max Dubois studied at the Paris Conservatoire from 1949 through 1953 where he was a pupil of Jean Doyen (piano) and Darius Milhaud (composition). His first professional commission, Suite humouristique (a piece for French radio), happened while he was a student at the age of 19.

He was awarded the Prix de Rome in 1955 for the cantata Le rire de Gargantua. Most of his works are for woodwinds, especially for saxophone. His Quartet for Saxophones in F premiered in 1962. Another of his works is the 'Pieces characteristiques en forme de suite', written for Alto Saxophone with piano accompaniment. In 1964 he was awarded the Grand Prix of the city of Paris for his strings ensemble piece Symphonie-sérénade. That same year he began working as a conductor; and in that capacity toured Belgium, Canada, France, and the United States.

While primarily a composer of instrumental pieces, Dubois also composed music for the stage. These include the ballets Impressiones foraines (1951), Le docteur Ox (composed 1961; premiered by the Lyon Opéra Ballet in 1965), and Hommage à Hoffnung (composed 1980, premiered at the Grand Théâtre de Bordeaux in 1981); and the operas Comment causer (composed 1970; premiered at the Opéra Royal de Wallonie in 1971), Les Suisses (composed 1972, premiered at the Opéra Royal de Wallonie in 1973), and Le ruban merveilleux (composed in 1990, premiered at the Forum des Halles in Paris on 31 May 1991).

Dubois was a professor of analysis at the Paris Conservatoire. He died in Rocquencourt in the Île-de-France region of North Central France on August 29, 1995.

Selected compositions
Titles and dates taken from Gerard Billaudot.

Piano
 * Impressions foraines (1963), arranged for two pianos in 1965
 * "Chutt", for four pianos (1965)
 * Histoires de piano (1978)
 * La maison d’à côté  (1979)
 * Voulez-vous jouer au cirque? (1983)
 * Bébé rose, for piano four-hands (1984)
 * Sonate (1985)
 * Dix préludes (1992)

Harpsichord
 * '' Partita pour Clavecin ou Piano (1963) / Prelude - Pavane - Toccata

Flute
 * Classiquement vôtre, for flute and guitar (1973)
 * Tic-Tac, for flute and piano (1975)
 * Ensuite?, for flute and piano (1981)
 * Histoires de flûte, for flute and piano (1984)

Recorder
 * A l'ancienne, for soprano recorder and harpsichord (1981)
 * Turlututu, for beginning soprano recorder and guitar or piano (1981)
 * Les tricoteuses, perpetual motion for soprano and alto recorder and keyboard (1982)

Oboe
 * Histoires de hautbois, for oboe and piano (1985)
 * Hommage à un ami, for oboe and piano (1985)

Clarinet
 * 18 duos progressifs, for two clarinets
 * Voltage, suite for bass clarinet solo

Bassoon

 * Histoires de basson (1976), Volumes 1 and 2 for 3 bassoons, Volume 3 for 4 bassoons
 * Aria et ruade (1980), for bassoon and piano
 * Mélopée (1980), for bassoon and piano
 * 3 nouvelles brèves (1980), for bassoon and piano
 * Sonatine-tango (1983), for bassoon and piano

Saxophone

 * Sonate-fantaisie, Duo concertant (1979)
 * 2 mini romances, for alto or tenor sax and piano (1979)
 * Prélude et rengaine, for alto or tenor sax and piano (1979)
 * Vieille chanson et rondinade, for tenor sax and piano (1980)
 * Olga-valse, for alto sax and piano (1980)
 * Respirations, for alto sax and piano (1980)
 * Métamorphoses, symphony for soprano, alto, tenor and baritone sax (1981)
 * Moments musicaux, for alto sax and instrumental ensemble, with version for alto sax and piano (1985)
 * L’imprévu, for sax quartet (1986)
 * 3 petites sonates A «Scarlatti», for sax quartet (1989)
 * Come back, for alto sax and piano (1992)
 * Dix préludes imaginaires, for sax quartet and orchestra (1992)
 * Le récit du chamelier, for alto sax (1992)
 * Mominettes, for alto sax (1993)
 * 16 études brillantes, for all the saxophones (1993)
 * 16 études techniques, contemporary studies (1993)
 * 17 études dansantes, for all the saxophones (1993)
 * 48 études faciles et progressives, for all the saxophones (1993)
 * 16 études de virtuosité, for all the saxophones (1994)
 * 20 études progressives en forme de duos, contemporary studies (1994)
 * 24 études caprices, for all the saxophones (1994)
 * 12 études modernes, for all the saxophones (1995)
 * 16 études variées, for all the saxophones (1995)
 * Bouquet d’hommages, for alto sax and piano (1995)
 * La gremellite, for alto sax and piano (1995)
 * Deuxième concerto, for alto sax and orchestra, with version for alto sax and piano (1995)
 * Lucienne et Cécilienne, for saxophone orchestra (1990)

Trombone
 * Cortége, for trombone and piano (1959)

Double Bass
 * Le Gai Cascadeur, for double bass and piano (1973)
 * Histories de Contrabasse, for double bass and piano (1988)

Wind Sextet
 * Sinfonia da Camera, for Flute, Oboe, Clarinet, Alto Saxophone, Bassoon, and Horn (1965)

title: Pierre Max Dubois


text:
All I Wanna Do

All I Wanna Do may refer to:

Film

 * All I Wanna Do (1998 film) or The Hairy Bird, a Canadian/American teen comedy
 * All I Wanna Do (2011 film), a Moroccan documentary

Music

 * "All I Wanna Do" (The Beach Boys song), 1970
 * "All I Wanna Do" (Dannii Minogue song), originally released in 1997 and reworked in 2020
 * "All I Wanna Do" (Jo Jo Zep & The Falcons song), 1980
 * "All I Wanna Do" (Sheryl Crow song), 1994
 * "All I Wanna Do" (Martin Jensen song), 2016
 * "All I Wanna Do", a song by Davidson from the album Grand Theft Auto 2 soundtrack
 * "All I Wanna Do", a song by Jetrin Wattanasin from the album Choola-Choola, 1995
 * "All I Wanna Do", a song by Full Force
 * "All I Wanna Do", a song by Jay Park (featuring Hoody and Loco) from the album Everything You Wanted
 * "All I Wanna Do", a song by Splashh from the album Comfort
 * "All I Wanna Do", a song by DEV from the album I Only See You When I'm Dreamin'
 * "All I Wanna Do Is Make Love to You" or "All I Wanna Do", a 1990 song by Heart from the album Brigade
 * All I Wanna Do (EP), a 2014 EP by T. Mills, or the title song

title: All I Wanna Do


text:
User:Mr Anthem

Sometimes I edit.

title: User:Mr Anthem


text:
User talk:Blacktav

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 04:52, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Good work
Just dropped by to say that your work on Digital permanence is appreciated. utcursch | talk 06:07, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello, I'm here onbehalf of WP:ORPHAN in which you are also a participant. So, we want your opinion to a WP:ORPHAN related matter. It is a proposal by. Please have a look here. Your opinion (i.e support, oppose etc) are very much appreciated there. Thank you. By Jim Cartar through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Honda CB500 (2013). I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:16, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Blacktav, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to World Motorcycle Test Cycle has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blacktav


text:
User talk:Romp~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 04:52, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Romp. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Romp~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Romp~enwiki