text:
User talk:Adenosine

Mike Jones
Who? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.207.175.154 (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Peer review of bacteria
Hi there. I'd value your input on this article. Thank you. TimVickers 05:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This article is now a Featured Article candidate, the nomination page is (here). Thank you. TimVickers 04:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

An editor has made some major changes to this article, could you please return to the FAC and provide some feedback on whether or not these are an improvement? TimVickers 21:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurs e work 17:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Nice figure
Just saw your central dogma figure and it looks great but I am wondering if it is accurate to say RNA to RNA to virus only. There are RNA dependent RNA poymerases involved in siRNA amplification mechanisms for one. David D. (Talk) 10:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Nice figure, but an error
More importantly the red and blue colors are switched on the color key to the central dogma figure. As you have drawn the arrows, blue is the general case and red is the special case. Anon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.132.168.230 (talk) 02:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

 * Are plant known as lower life forms? This seems to be from an animal centric POV. There are higher and lower plants, as there are higher and lower animals. I don't think the hierarchy is meant to comparre between animal and plants. David D. (Talk) 22:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Immune system
Hi Mike. HELP! This article has been nominated for FA, but needs editing. If you can spare any time to help us copy edit and clarify I'd be most grateful. TimVickers 05:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurs e work 09:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Userpage -moz-border-radius
I don't know if you know this already, but the -moz-border tag is a mozilla firefox specific style, ie. internet explorer does not display the round corners. This isnt a problem for small radiuses, but large radiuses can have display problems in other browsers, and unfortunately do on your user page. But nice to find another firefox user :). 84.68.176.104 10:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Forgot that when im using internet explorer i'm not automatically signed in! The previous comment was me... - Zephyris Talk 10:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Stem cell diagram
Hi there. Something seems to have happened to your Stem cell diagram. I'm not sure where it went. TimVickers 01:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Where did my picture go!?
Recently a diagram I designed has disappeared in to the void. Where did it go? is now missing, can anyone help? Adenosinetalk 18:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

 * Naconkantari deleted it as there was already a copy of the image on it was moved to the Commons. Find it here. --Sopoforic 18:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein!
– ClockworkSoul 18:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurs e work 16:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Fumurate-->Fumarate
It appears some of the SVGs you uploaded had "fumurate" rather than "fumarate". I don't know how many there were, but I fixed the spellings on Image:TCA.svg and Image:Glyoxylatepath.svg. Thanks for making these great pictures! --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 05:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Antioxidant FAC
Hi there. I wondered if you had time to review this article? The FAC nomination is here. Thank you. TimVickers 05:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurs e work 16:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Another FAC
Hi there, metabolism this time. Any comments? TimVickers 23:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's passed, I wondered if I could list you on the talk page as somebody who could help with "verification and sources"? TimVickers 15:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 19:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Adenosine receptors and caffeine
Maybe you'd be interested in looking into this. Regards Samsara (talk • contribs) 10:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 21:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Nuclear pore
Dear Mike, I am a user of the Occitan wikipedia ; and I would like to know if it could be possible to use your wonderfull drawing of the nuclear pore for the Occitan article  (without a drawing like this one, there would no point in enhancing the article because it would not be very easy to understand) ; I've seen that there is a licence restiction, this is why I wanted to ask you, in case there would be a chance the Occitan wikipedia can use it. Sincerely, Lembeye

Many thanks. Thanks to your drawing, if you go to the Occitan page, you'll see that thanks to you, the article has been enhanced, though, I hope it will be improved soon. We still have a little problem to view it in its page, although the file works perfectly. We'll check that with our manager. Thanks again and congratulation for this drawing and for the others you made (both artistically and scientificly). We all know that biology is nothing without proper illustration. Best, Eric : Lembeye

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 19:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Erica Kubanek
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Erica Kubanek, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Erica Kubanek seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Erica Kubanek, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:EK1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:EK1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:EK1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:EK1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:EK1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:EK1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 12:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Nice work!
I just came across Image:TCA.svg, and I thought, "Nice diagram! I wonder if it's lifted from somewhere, or if it's a nicely free work?" And then I thought, "I wonder if it's a boring, static old GIF, or a nicely-scalable SVG?" And I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the answer to both questions was a resounding "Yes!"! —Steve Summit (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 06:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Uploading your image on Commons
Hi, I uploaded one of your images on Commons. I hope this is okay with you and doesn't break any rules. It seems you released it under a "Commons Attribution ShareAlike License version 2.5", but on Commons I could only enter a 3.0 sharealike license version, so I hope that is not a big problem. Sakkura 18:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

transfersome
Can you cite a published source for "transfersome"? --JWSchmidt 13:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the the information. And: I know how it goes, I have also been very busy in the real world. --JWSchmidt (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 15:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Cell signaling
I see you have an interest in signal transduction/cell signaling. If you'd like to contribute, I invite you to join WikiProject Cell Signaling. Please feel free to add your name to the participants list, or the guestlist if you are time limited, and dive right in. If that field is too broad, feel free to create mini-projects or task forces dealing with whatever focused subject you are comfortable with. Biochemza, 13:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Central Dogma figure
Heya! I just wanted to give you kudos for a beautiful and highly informative figure, far better than my sad little graph. Keep up the good work on the scientific diagrams, you have a real flair for it. -Kieran 15:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Sucrose starch biosynthesis
Hello

Could you create picture(s) for the synthesis of sucrose and starch in plants? (reply here)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 13:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 20:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

asking permission
Dear Sir,

My name is Sylvia Pratiwi. I'm a lecturer at Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. I'm planning to wite a book about pharmaceutical microbiology and I would like to use the images that you've made(Central Dogma of Molecular Biology, bacterial flagella, bacterial conjugation and T2 phage) at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adenosine/Gallery

Would you mind giving me information about my possiblity to use this image in my book? Because this book will be commercially published and used as a textbook for undergraduate student here in Indonesia to study about microbiology in pharmacy.

Hope to hear from you soon, and thank you very much for your kindly help and attention.

Yours Sincerely, Sylvia Pratiwi

pipie155@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.130.245.155 (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 08:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:HatchSlackpathway.png
A tag has been placed on Image:HatchSlackpathway.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

your brassica image is incorrect
Dear Adenosine, the brassica image is showing the plants as if they were haploids. This is incorrect. Normal plants are diploids and carry 2n chromosomes. regards Herman van Eck, Geneticist at Wageningen University —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.224.252.10 (talk) 11:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand what you mean but I don't think it is too much of an issue here. The diagram was not intended just to convey inter-relatedness in the brassica group. Maybe it is a diagram of the DNA in pollen? Or maybe it is the DNA of a haploid genome so that genetic redundancy isn't too confusing (that's what I had in mind). I'd be happy to redesign it if you could suggest a elegant way to design a more accurate model Adenosinetalk 19:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Ion Channel
Hi! I have made some simple picture for the ion channel for the polish Wikipedia. If you know somebody, who could translate this to english, you can take it and insert in your Ion channel. The link is: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Ion_channel.png This is only simple scheme, I hope - correct.

I have also made simple scheme, comparing the chemical and electric synapse, placed here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electr_and_chem_synapse.png?uselang=pl

Answers, in any, please put in my polish wiki discussion site: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Outslider (add new section: http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Outslider&action=edit&section=new )

Outslider (talk) 14:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

T4 Bacteriophage Image
Your graphic of a T4 bacteriophage is excellent. --69.226.100.7 (talk) 06:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Stem_cells_diagram Image
Hi I would like to use your http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stem_cells_diagram.png image in my website. Not sure if I understand the License hence checking with you We would be a startup software company providing services for biotech companies. 114.143.52.132 (talk) 11:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Tanmay
 * Hey! Feel free to use the image however you like. The license is pretty simple: Use, edit, change, etc the picture however you want, just ensure you attribute the work to me or wikipedia. If you do edit or change the picture let other people use it and borrow it similarly. As a personal favor to me, if/when you do you use the diagram, could you send me a link - I like to see how my work is being used. Adenosinetalk 19:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Calvin cycle scheme
I removed the otherwise beautiful image of the Calvin cycle until you might repair it. The ketone is not protonated in the ribulosediphosphate. At least, I think I am correct, apologies if I am not.--Smokefoot (talk) 17:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up! Fixed, and fixed! Feel free to make any edits yourself in the future! Adenosinetalk 03:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

File:HatchSlackpathway2.svg
Carbon dioxide is not a substrate for PEPC as it is shown in this diagram. is first converted to a bicarbonate ion which PEPC adds to PEP. Could you update the diagram to show this please? Maybe add in carbonic anhydrase too as this converts the carbonic acid > HCO3-. Good work otherwise though! If you're feeling like it, it would be better if the cells were joined rather than as separate entities. The substrates are all transported between cells through plasmodesmata, rather than diffusing through the membrane. Let me know if this doesn't make sense. Thanks Smartse (talk) 13:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Grrl
GrrlScientist apparently likes your image, but not your spelling. . . dave souza, talk 18:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Permission for picture usage
Hello Mr Jones, my name is Miloš Šunderić, and I am writing a part of the chapter for certain book about lectin affinity chromatography. I am new at this copyright matters, and not fully aware of the rules, so I would like to ask you If I have a permission to use the picture by the name "Overview of LPS structure", as a example of this molecule structure, if it is possible. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chomac (talk • contribs) 09:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:HisColumn.jpg

The file File:HisColumn.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Unused, doesn't seem to have much use to transfer to Commons."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 15:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Suggestion of Correction to the image on DNA Replication Modes
About File:DNAreplicationModes.png. I suppose there might be something wrong with the depiction of dispersive mode. It is, at present, shown that in dispersive mode of replication each strand of a DNA molecule has been paired with that of the same property (e.g., a newly synthesized fragment paired with again a newly synthesized fragment, i.e., thin red with thin red, and red with red). However, M. Delbrück had indicated that each strand in itself has alternating patterns of original and new nucleotides. .
 * Therefore, I would suggest a correction of each duplex of dispersive mode accordingly, in which every strand has patterns of red and thin red following each other and paired reciprocally with the opposite pattern, i.e., thin red with red and vice versa.

Although it may not be of much importance, since it still gains the insight to understanding the Meselson-Stahl experiment, I'm afraid it is not the actual representation of dispersive model proposed by Delbrück.

Thank you for such a useful schema of all three hypotheses of DNA replication. William Savalto (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adenosine


text:
User talk:Vegso~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Also, please note that it would probably be best for you to be adding OGame-related information to the OGame article directly, rather than creating sub-pages, as this is much more the Wikipedia style. The links above will help you with information related to Wikipedia style guidelines. --Darkwind 05:57, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Vegso. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Vegso~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Vegso~enwiki


text:
Myopathy

In medicine, myopathy is a disease of the muscle in which the muscle fibers do not function properly. Myopathy means muscle disease (Greek : myo- muscle + patheia -pathy : suffering). This meaning implies that the primary defect is within the muscle, as opposed to the nerves ("neuropathies" or "neurogenic" disorders) or elsewhere (e.g., the brain).

This muscular defect typically results in myalgia (muscle pain), muscle weakness (reduced muscle force), or premature muscle fatigue (initially normal, but declining muscle force). Muscle cramps, stiffness, spasm, and contracture can also be associated with myopathy. Myopathy experienced over a long period (chronic) may result in the muscle becoming an abnormal size, such as muscle atrophy (abnormally small) or a pseudoathletic appearance (abnormally large).

Capture myopathy can occur in wild or captive animals, such as deer and kangaroos, and leads to morbidity and mortality. It usually occurs as a result of stress and physical exertion during capture and restraint.

Muscular disease can be classified as neuromuscular or musculoskeletal in nature. Some conditions, such as myositis, can be considered both neuromuscular and musculoskeletal. Different myopathies may be inherited, infectious, non-communicable, or idiopathic (cause unknown). The disease may be isolated to affecting only muscle (pure myopathy), or may be part of a systemic disease as is typical in mitochondrial myopathies.

Signs and symptoms
Common symptoms include muscle weakness, cramps, stiffness, and tetany.

Systemic diseases
Myopathies in systemic disease results from several different disease processes including endocrine, inflammatory, paraneoplastic, infectious, drug- and toxin-induced, critical illness myopathy, metabolic, collagen related, and myopathies with other systemic disorders. Patients with systemic myopathies often present acutely or sub acutely. On the other hand, familial myopathies or dystrophies generally present in a chronic fashion with exceptions of metabolic myopathies where symptoms on occasion can be precipitated acutely. Metabolic myopathies, which affect the production of ATP within the muscle cell, typically present with dynamic (exercise-induced) rather than static symptoms. Most of the inflammatory myopathies can have a chance association with malignant lesion; the incidence appears to be specifically increased only in patients with dermatomyositis.

There are many types of myopathy. ICD-10 codes are provided here where available.

Inherited forms

 * (G71.0) Dystrophies (or muscular dystrophies) are a subgroup of myopathies characterized by muscle degeneration and regeneration. Clinically, muscular dystrophies are typically progressive, because the muscles' ability to regenerate is eventually lost, leading to progressive weakness, often leading to use of a wheelchair, and eventually death, usually related to respiratory weakness.
 * (G71.1) Myotonia
 * Neuromyotonia
 * (G71.2) The congenital myopathies do not show evidence for either a progressive dystrophic process (i.e., muscle death) or inflammation, but instead characteristic microscopic changes are seen in association with reduced contractile ability of the muscles. Congenital myopathies include, but are not limited to:
 * (G71.2) nemaline myopathy (characterized by presence of "nemaline rods" in the muscle),
 * (G71.2) multi/minicore myopathy (characterized by multiple small "cores" or areas of disruption in the muscle fibers),
 * (G71.2) centronuclear myopathy (or myotubular myopathy) (in which the nuclei are abnormally found in the center of the muscle fibers), a rare muscle wasting disorder
 * (G71.3) Mitochondrial myopathies, which are due to defects in mitochondria, which provide a critical source of energy for muscle
 * (G72.3) Familial periodic paralysis
 * (G72.4) Inflammatory myopathies, which are caused by problems with the immune system attacking components of the muscle, leading to signs of inflammation in the muscle
 * (G73.6) Metabolic myopathies, which result from defects in biochemical metabolism that primarily affect muscle
 * (G73.6/E74.0) Glycogen storage diseases, which may affect muscle
 * (G73.6/E75) Lipid storage disorder
 * (G72.89) Other myopathies
 * Brody myopathy
 * Congenital myopathy with abnormal subcellular organelles
 * Fingerprint body myopathy
 * Inclusion body myopathy 2
 * Megaconial myopathy
 * Myofibrillar myopathy
 * Rimmed vacuolar myopathy

Acquired
The Food and Drug Administration is recommending that physicians restrict prescribing high-dose Simvastatin (Zocor, Merck) to patients, given an increased risk of muscle damage. The FDA drug safety communication stated that physicians should limit using the 80-mg dose unless the patient has already been taking the drug for 12 months and there is no evidence of myopathy. "Simvastatin 80 mg should not be started in new patients, including patients already taking lower doses of the drug," the agency states.
 * (G72.0 - G72.2) External substance induced myopathy
 * (G72.0) Drug-induced myopathy
 * Glucocorticoid myopathy is caused by this class of steroids increasing the breakdown of the muscle proteins leading to muscle atrophy.
 * (G72.1) Alcoholic myopathy
 * (G72.2) Myopathy due to other toxic agents - including atypical myopathy in horses caused by toxins in sycamore seeds and seedlings.
 * (M33.0-M33.1)
 * Dermatomyositis produces muscle weakness and skin changes. The skin rash is reddish and most commonly occurs on the face, especially around the eyes, and over the knuckles and elbows.  Ragged nail folds with visible capillaries can be present. It can often be treated by drugs like corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. (M33.2)
 * Polymyositis produces muscle weakness. It can often be treated by drugs like corticosteroids or immunosuppressants.
 * Inclusion body myositis is a slowly progressive disease that produces weakness of hand grip and straightening of the knees. No effective treatment is known.
 * (M60.9) Benign acute childhood myositis
 * (M61) Myositis ossificans
 * (M62.89) Rhabdomyolysis and (R82.1) myoglobinurias
 * Statin-associated autoimmune myopathy

Myocardium / cardio-myopathy

 * Acute myocarditis
 * Myocarditis in diseases classified elsewhere
 * Cardiomyopathy
 * Dilated cardiomyopathy
 * Obstructive hypertrophy cardiomyopathy
 * Other hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
 * Endomyocardial (eosinophilic) disease
 * Eosinophilic myocarditis
 * Endomyocardial (tropical) fibrosis
 * Löffler's endocarditis
 * Endocardial fibroelastosis
 * Other restrictive cardiomyopathy
 * Alcoholic cardiomyopathy
 * Other cardiomyopathies
 * Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
 * Cardiomyopathy in diseases classified elsewhere

Differential diagnosis
At birth''
 * None as systemic causes; mainly hereditary

Onset in childhood
 * Inflammatory myopathies – dermatomyositis, polymyositis (rarely)
 * Infectious myopathies
 * Endocrine and metabolic disorders – hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia

Onset in adulthood
 * Inflammatory myopathies – polymyositis, dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, viral (HIV)
 * Infectious myopathies
 * Endocrine myopathies – thyroid, parathyroid, adrenal, pituitary disorders
 * Toxic myopathies – alcohol, corticosteroids, narcotics, colchicines, chloroquine
 * Critical illness myopathy
 * Metabolic myopathies
 * Paraneoplastic myopathy

Treatments
Because different types of myopathies are caused by many different pathways, there is no single treatment for myopathy. Treatments range from treatment of the symptoms to very specific cause-targeting treatments. Drug therapy, physical therapy, bracing for support, surgery, and massage are all current treatments for a variety of myopathies.

title: Myopathy


text:
Fugues (magazine)

Fugues is a magazine with a focus on gay content, which publishes monthly in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, since April 1984. The magazine is primarily written in French, although some English content is also published as well. It focuses on news related to LGBT communities, gay culture, nightlife, health, fitness, fashion, travel, festivals, arts and entertainment. Each issue contains articles on news, trends, culture, nightlife, community activities, special folders, and opinion articles.

Content
The magazine aims to highlight both popular and under-the-radar events, personalities and products that appeal to LGBT people both local and abroad visiting Montreal (and Quebec Province), through a variety of portals that include a print publication, an interactive website, a digital newsletter, and an extensive social media presence. FUGUES’ informed commentary on a variety of topics—including nightlife, dining, entertainment, politics, community issues, fashion, travel, sports, and celebrity— informs a community and engages an influential and loyal readership.

Fugues writes in order to support and promote the LGBT community. It features a listing of locations in the current Quebec gay scene as well as softcore erotic advertisements and a large directory section, including community group information, business contacts, real estate, ads for health and body care, massage and escort services, counseling services and phone lines. It also features a horoscope column with a love twist, several columns, several features and special sections each month.

Distribution
Fugues is published as an alternative format (7" X 10,25") glossy magazine and is distributed as a free publication not only in Montreal's Gay Village, but also all over town and in selected cities across Canada such as Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto, Vancouver and over 20 smaller cities all over the Province of Quebec. It is the only LGBT magazine title in Quebec with a regular print circulation.

Fugues' outreach of over 255,000 monthly readers is maintained through multiple mediums, such as their monthly free publication which reaches a circulation of 39,000+ copies reaching 210,000+ readers, a virtual PDF version of the publication, a daily updated website, weekly E-newsletters, and an active Facebook page.

Each month the magazine offers more than 160 pages of articles on a large diversity of subjects, and several columns written from its main audience's perspective by leading and well-respected journalists, celebrities and community leaders.

Staff
The magazine is published by Éditions Nitram.

Yves Lafontaine is the director/editor in chief. Contributors to the magazine have included André C. Passiour, Michel Joanny-Furtin, Denis-Daniel Boullé, Julie Vaillancourt, Olivier Gagnon, Patrick Brunette, Eric Paquette. Photographers Robert Laliberté, Oscar Ochoa, Perry Senecal, StudioFotofusion's Dominic Brunet as well as Montreal's high camp drag queen Mado Lamotte, sommelier Olivier de Maisonneuve, local DJ Louis Costa, and Andre Roy (one of Quebec most notable poets and critics) are part of the magazine's panel of contributors.

Other publications by the same publisher
Fugues publishers publish a number of other publications including:
 * Guide Arc-en-ciel
 * Quebec Rainbow Guide (English version of Guide Arc-en-ciel)
 * DecorHomme
 * Zip (erotic magazine)

title: Fugues (magazine)


text:
The Mumbly Cartoon Show

The Mumbly Cartoon Show is a Saturday morning animated series produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions and featuring the titular Mumbly, a cartoon dog detective. It was broadcast on ABC from September 11, 1976 to September 3, 1977 as part of The Tom and Jerry/Grape Ape/Mumbly Show. This compilation packaged reruns of the 1975 The Tom and Jerry/Grape Ape Show with Mumbly as a new component.

Mumbly is a private eye dog in a trenchcoat, who works with a human detective, Chief Schnooker, to catch criminals who often sport alliterative names. 16 episodes were produced. Mumbly was voiced by Don Messick, and Schnooker by John Stephenson.

The show was not a ratings success, and only lasted one season. However, in the next season, Mumbly was included in Hanna-Barbera's crossover show, Laff-A-Lympics, on the villainous "Really Rottens" team. Mumbly was not a villain in his earlier show, but the character was a substitution for the actually-villainous Muttley from the 1969 series Wacky Races, who could not appear on Laff-A-Lympics as those characters were co-owned by Heatter-Quigley Productions. A predecessor to Muttley and Mumbly is the dog Mugger, who appears in the 1964 movie Hey There, It's Yogi Bear!.

The show was also broadcast in West Germany in 1982, Yugoslavia circa 1985/1986, France in 1978, Poland circa 1983/1984.

Episodes

 * Telecast at Noon (EST), Thursday afternoon, November 25, 1976, a Thanksgiving, as part of ABC's Thanksgiving Funshine Festival.

Other appearances

 * Mumbly appeared in the syndicated TV film Yogi Bear and the Magical Flight of the Spruce Goose (1987).
 * Chief Schnooker makes a cameo in the Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law episode "SPF".
 * Mumbly is shown on a list in the Velma episode "Velma Makes a List".

title: The Mumbly Cartoon Show


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogame/index/technology/energy

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 17:10, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ogame/index/technology/energy
This article looks like a page from some game's strategy guide. The title is terrible and the content is unencyclopedic. Delete. Carrp | Talk 06:01, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, this pages contains no salvagable information --nixie 06:34, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: no context, not an article, Wikipedia is not a game guide. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:44, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The author has created 7 of these weirdly named pages that should probably all be speedied as they have no real contents Preisler 06:47, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a game guide. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:49, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are many thing wikipedia is not. This is many of those things. -R. fiend 08:18, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. jni 14:06, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)


text: Template:PD-Pakistan

title: Template:PD-Pakistan


text:
User talk:Glamour Boy

Beer Categories
It has been suggested by User:BrianSmithson that the Beer and brewery categories should be renamed. The proposal has been supported by User:Syrthiss, and supported and expanded by myself. The notion is that the regional categories should follow the format of "Beer and breweries in Africa" /Europe/Asia/North America/South America/Oceania. "Brewers and breweries" could also be renamed "Beer and breweries by region". And all the countries should also be renamed (and merged if needed) as, for example, "Beer and breweries of Germany", "Beer and breweries of Britain", "Beer and breweries of Poland". The word in each case would be beer rather than beers to allow for general articles on beer culture in each region as well as individual beers. Comments, suggestions, objections and simple votes to Wiki Beer Project SilkTork 14:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Brewery poll
Your vote/opinion on brewery notability is requested here: SilkTork 11:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

CBC Radio 3
Just a quick question for you...I don't know if "Dudes Where's My Tour Diary?" is really a regular feature that a variety of bands participate in — in my experience, it's unique to the band The Dudes. Would you happen to know either way for sure? Bearcat 22:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

 * Just so you know, we're not supposed to use the "see also" section of an article to repeat links that we've already included in the article, such as The R3-30 or CBC Radio 3 Sessions. "See also" is supposed to be for related topics that haven't already been linked to in the article. Bearcat 04:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Greatlakeswimmers.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Greatlakeswimmers.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 18:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ThePerps.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ThePerps.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dejeunersurlherbe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dejeunersurlherbe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BCJukebox.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BCJukebox.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

This is rather off-topic but...
Who was the song Glamour Boy written about? Would you know? Thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Perps.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Perps.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Labatt.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Labatt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:R330.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:R330.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Breno talk 11:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Lesterbangsparamount.jpg
Hi, how's it going? Just a quick note about your image Image:Lesterbangsparamount.jpg, maybe you should add a fair use rationale. The reason I mention it is I've really enjoyed seeing the picture in the Guess Who article, and it'd be a shame if it got deleted. Actually it was me who added the Kevin Spacey image to the article, and I just recently added a fair use rationale to it as well, as I had neglected to do so before. I just thought I'd mention it to you before BetacommandBot gets after you, so that we can keep both images in the article. Also, please make sure to include a link to the article in question (i.e. The Guess Who) in the heading of the fair use rationale itself; lately Wikipedia has been deleting images if that link is not provided. Thanks! Moisejp (talk) 01:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kidsinhall.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kidsinhall.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Mick Dalla-Vee
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mick Dalla-Vee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Mick Dalla-Vee. Optigan13 (talk) 03:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mick Dalla-Vee
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mick Dalla-Vee, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Mick Dalla-Vee. Thank you. Optigan13 (talk) 00:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bandeapart.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Bandeapart.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --15:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Randybachmanvinyltap.jpg
I have tagged Image:Randybachmanvinyltap.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sleeman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sleeman.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Molson.jpg)
You've uploaded File:Molson.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Beerflagtest.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Beerflagtest.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  04:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Novillero.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Novillero.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Paperbacks.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Paperbacks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Towtruck.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Towtruck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lesterbangsparamount.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lesterbangsparamount.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2016
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Grande-Clairière a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hwy43 (talk) 02:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Glamour Boy


text:
User talk:Maberk

Spanish Translation of the Week
I would like to revive this project. I noticed that you've added yourself to the list of available Spanish-to-English translators. Are you interested in working on Spanish Translation of the Week? — J3ff 06:04, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your interest. Currently, the translation of the week is at René Favaloro. Future Translations of the week will be listed on this page. — J3ff 05:40, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The article you voted for, Origin of the name California, is now the Translation of the Week. Please help work on it. — J3ff 22:51, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Improvement Drive
An IP has listed your vote here: This_week%27s_improvement_drive. Is this vote ok? If not, please just delete it.--Fenice 17:35, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

Regional notice board
You are wellcome to join the Argentine regional notice board. -Mariano 17:31, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Project!
I am kindly inviting you to join our new project page!

--Sebastian Kessel Talk 17:18, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Mensaje de un wikipedista norteamericano
¡Saludos, compañero de Wikipedia! I'm coming to Argentina soon and wanted to see if any of my fellow Wikipedians were interested in meeting up, etc...I'm flying into BsAs on Jan. 25th and I don't know many people there, so if you'd be into talking/getting together, let me know. Feel free to leave a message on my user page...seeya around - Paul 22:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Just Ignacio
You can't reprod articles. Any objection, even if it's removing the template with no explanation, counts. Prod is for uncontested deletions only. I've therefore moved the discussion to AfD. NickelShoe 05:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * No. You can't put it back.  When the other editor removed it, that was stating his/her objection.  That makes the deletion controversial  Prod is only for uncontroversial deletions.  So if someone removes the notice, do not put it back, send to to AfD so it can be talked about.  Refer to Proposed_deletion. NickelShoe 15:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maberk


text:
User talk:Surnólë

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Welcome, newcomer!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:

 * First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
 * When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
 * Remember to use a neutral point of view!
 * If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

 * Policy Library
 * Utilities
 * Cite your sources
 * Verifiability
 * Wikiquette
 * Civility
 * Conflict resolution
 * Brilliant prose
 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
 * Village pump
 * Boilerplate text

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun!

ClockworkSoul 06:04, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Mohammed/Muhammad
Hi, I realize that Muhammad is simply a transliteration from Arabic to latin characters, so it probably doesn't matter which spelling Wikipedia uses. My feeling, however, is that it benefits Wikipedia to be consistent. Formerly, pages were linked to Mohamed, Muhamed, Mohamad, Muhammad, Muhammed, Mohammad, Mohammed, Mohemmed, and Mahommed. While it may not matter which of these spellings is used, consistency helps readers of Wikipedia realize that there was only one Prophet Muhammad, rather than about 10 different ones. The same confusion comes from Koran vs. Quran vs. Qur'an, Moslem vs. Muslim, and other transliterations. If one form is generally accepted, it makes sense to consistently use that form, rather than mixing and matching 20 different spellings. In many cases, in fact, there are pages with multiple spellings of a name in the same paragraph. This is bound to confuse some readers. --Jacobolus 17:06, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Turaga (Bionicle)
I have nominated Turaga (Bionicle), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Turaga (Bionicle). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Turaga (Bionicle)
I have nominated Turaga (Bionicle), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Turaga (Bionicle)&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Turaga (Bionicle)
I have nominated Turaga (Bionicle), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Turaga (Bionicle)&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  MBisanz  talk 03:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Surnólë


text: Talk:Tanaina

title: Talk:Tanaina