text:
Talk:Rich Johnston

Photograph
Can we get a new photo? Johnston has put on about 70lb since that was taken, and gone bald. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.19.125 (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Hagiography?
Um, do you think this might be just a teeny bit hagiographic?

 * I've hopefull addressed that. Hiding talk 13:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

 * Based on 217.204.160.58's contributions, it honestly looks to me like it might be Johnston himself who wrote a lot of this entry. It very well might not be, but he wouldn't be the first person to contribute to their own entry. For instance, John Byrne's all up in that. --Chris Griswold 18:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Could we address the number of comics professionals he's irritated by his casual regard to accuracy and his own personal brand of egotistical narcissim? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.19.125 (talk) 09:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion
Someone should add the comics CSI:Dying in the Gutters and Civil Wardrobe. (and add a mention of swipe files) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 16:44 October 2, 2006 (talk • contribs) 152.163.100.195

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Rich Johnston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080220080228/http://www.holedup.net:80/ to http://www.holedup.net

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Rich Johnston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100530075157/http://www.comicsbeat.com/2010/05/24/2010-eagle-awards-nominations/ to http://www.comicsbeat.com/2010/05/24/2010-eagle-awards-nominations/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rich Johnston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080804032618/http://www.idwpublishing.com/dyinggut.shtml to http://www.idwpublishing.com/dyinggut.shtml
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.holedup.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Rich Johnston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.comicsbulletin.com/rage/96503688615423.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708180723/http://www.comicbookresources.com:8080/?page=article&id=7859 to http://www.comicbookresources.com:8080/?page=article&id=7859
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329093156/http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/04/17/exclusive-doctor-who-room-with-a-deja-view-writer-rich-johnston-talks-tardis-and-time-lords/ to http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/04/17/exclusive-doctor-who-room-with-a-deja-view-writer-rich-johnston-talks-tardis-and-time-lords/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080521072901/http://www.idwpublishing.com/titles/bushcards.shtml to http://www.idwpublishing.com/titles/bushcards.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106035212/http://www.2000adreview.co.uk/features/interviews/2006/johnston/rich-johnston.shtml to http://www.2000adreview.co.uk/features/interviews/2006/johnston/rich-johnston.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Rich Johnston


text:
User talk:Angie Y.

 '''Past messages are archived.

Other CL fanfics
Along with Pretty Guardian Sailor Lyoko, Jeremie and the Renault Factory, and Blast Into The Past, I will also work on two other stories:

The first one is called The Wedding of Two Worlds. It is a romance/wedding story that foretells of the wedding between Jim Moral�s and Suzanne Hertz.

 * A 'sequel' to "Then Jim Rode In" that portrays the wedding of Jim and Suzanne. According to a Lyokian prophecy, if an adult virtual warrior (Jim) marries an Earth woman (Suzanne), the two parallel worlds will be alligned together as one world. Before their nuptials, Jeremie and his friends must do battle with XANA, as he plans on disrupting the prophecy.

 * Blast Into The Future, a sequel to Blast Into The Past.

--User:Angie Y.

New Lyokian powers! =D
Aelita, Odd, and Ulrich will get new powers in Lyoko! --User:Angie Y.

 * Whoa! Where did you get that information?  Oh I hope Aelita gets a weapon! --Jeremie@theLab 00:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I got it from codelyoko.net and codelyoko.fr. --User:Angie Y.

 * Ha! Did you read in the Season 3 preview how XANA is living in the Internet servers of the United States?  Gotta love the French for sticking our country with XANA.  Have you ever tracked the USA-France animosity in CL?  The only time the artists showed the American flag, its stars and half of the stripes were obscured.  DISRESPECT!   Jer emie  @theLab

Yeah! At least the US will finally be on XANA's dooming list. --User:Angie Y.

 * Xana's lazy now. He's had several months of freedom and hasn't done so much as lift a finger to squash his enemies in the real world. As for the topic of the section, Aelita's able fire devastating balls of energy that are aesthetically pleasing at the same time. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 03:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Plus, Odd has been held back a grade for unknown and unfair reasons! He passed the School Finals in Final Mix! --User:Angie Y.

 * He hasn't been held back a grade. He was just put in different classes. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 14:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh. Okay. --User:Angie Y.

 * I found some screecaps on codelyoko.fr. under their Season 3 section. CAN'T WAIT FOR THE EPISODE!  Jeremie's new superscanning program looks amazing.  It appears that, by targeting servers in once country (in the case of his example, Egypt), he can scan the servers of every country in any given continent!  He does the same to North America, sending out a signal from Canada.  You know why I think XANA is being lazy?  If you're going to bring down the world's premier super power, do it style and class.  He's probably learning our weaknesses and how he can exploit our computer networks to wreak havoc.  That's my hypothesis anyway.  And, how did Odd pass his Final Exam?  He turned the paper into an origami duck?! --Jeremie@theLab 01:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

No, no! After the return trip, Jeremie agreed to help Odd with his exam questions, as he failed before the trip. Plus, I think they think of Jimbo as an enemy now. :( --User:Angie Y.

 * Darn! Jim could be useful too!  Jer emie  @theLab

I know! :'( --User:Angie Y.

The hero wiki
Hello Angie.Y I Djf2014 Have created a wiki called The Hero Wiki

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Zim.disguise.pointing.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Zim.disguise.pointing.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Angie, I would recommend a mentor
Angie, I know that our constant complaining is not helping the situation. Countless times we have done this, and you continue making these edits. And today, you add this. You obviously will not work with us or listen to us when we put messages on your talk page, so I would HIGHY recommend a mentor. I think that 1 on 1 contact will be better than editors coming here evey time you make these edits. I would be willing to be your mentor, and give me a hollar if you would wish that. :-) Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 00:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

 * If you want a mentor, I could also take the job. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

What are you planning here? I'm only trying to contribute! You're clearly giving me shit here! I QUIT!! Angie Y. (talk) 00:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

 * There's no need for the drama. Calm down. You clearly need someone to control the sort of behaviour you have just displayed. Your reaction is an insult to the integrity and good will of the editors who are trying very hard to help you become a better editor. Seraphim Whipp 00:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Please, Angie, I know you are trying to contribute well, but you are violating policies, and you can't continue to do so. We only want to help. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

 * We are not trying to "plan" anything, we are just trying to help. This is what a mentor would be for. Someone to help you cool down in these situations. Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 16:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Angie. Please answer the question. Would you like a mentor who will help make your edits better and help you cool down? After your last edits (such as the one to Oscar Grouch), it really makes me want you to have a mentor. As I said, give me a hollar if you want me to be yours Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 23:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC) (formerly Codelyoko193).

Sure, go ahead. Angie Y. (talk) 23:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

 * OK, would you like me to create a separate userpage just for us to communicate? Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 00:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Never mind, do that yourself as I am signing off for the day. Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 01:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure! Angie Y. (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This is such a positive step. Angie, you are very talented and your writing is vivid. I hope Interrobang can help you use your skills in the best way possible; maybe by working hard on an article you like, to get it up to GA standard? I hope that in the following time, there'll be nothing but praise. I sincerely wish you both well :). Seraphim Whipp 01:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I feel the same way. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * User:Angie Y./Mentor. Please add this to your watchlist and I will leave messages there for you. Leave one there if YOU have a question. Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 02:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Did you add it to your watchlist yet? Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 16:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I did. Angie Y. (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Interrobang has asked me if I would also help mentor you when he is not around. I said that I would gladly help out if it was ok with you? Seraphim Whipp 18:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'm not so sure, since you have harrassed me before. Angie Y. (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Excuse me? I have done nothing but try to be kind to you, point out things you have done that are hurtful so you can understand the effect you're bad behaviour is having. You bullied people and then began accusing them of bullying. You have been incivil and have personally attacked more editors than I can count and not been blocked. You edit war and push your POV and original research. I have stayed neutral with you, despite my personal feelings towards you. Despite all of these issues, I had offered to mentor you, and you accuse me of harassing you. I am more than gobsmacked.

 * That's it. I am absolutely done with you. Seraphim Whipp 18:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey, just wanted to say, thanks for confirming the Nights thing. Little pieces of info like that are important for an article. So, thanks again! (Oh, and Invader Zim indeed rocks. xD) (ApostleJoe (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC))

As does Code Lyoko, and Power Rangers, and even Sesame Street. Wanna be friends? Angie Y. (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure! So are you into NiGHTS? I ask because there's a lot of info that needs added about the series, and I forget a lot about the first game (its been ten years since I played it...).

Also, the episode of Coke Lyoko where that guy turned off gravity gave me nightmares. xD (ApostleJoe (talk) 00:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC))

 * Yes, I am into NiGHTS, and the concept of dream worlds in general. The episode "I'd Rather Not Talk About It" gave me nightmares, because I despise Jim's muscleheaded attitude and constant insults! Angie Y. (talk) 02:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea who Jim is. But I know that he is way too muscle-headed! xP Well, I'm going to go try to collect as much information on Reala as possible to justify creating him his own page. Join me, won't you? xD (ApostleJoe (talk) 04:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC))

Oh, I will. :) Angie Y. (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

It's A Dog's Life/Egg Yolkeo
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article It's A Dog's Life/Egg Yolkeo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion
Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here. --User: (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Undoing edits
Hello, Angie. When undoing the edits of others (like ), please give a reason for your revert. You could also try contacting the user. Please do this in the future. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 03:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Angie Y. (talk) 03:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Whatever Happened to Robot Jones?
Hi, please do not insert opinions into articles. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Same goes for Code Lyoko articles. Take the hint already. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 20:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

 * That would make him a meatpuppet. Thanks for confirming that. Now when you have him help you to edit war, I can report the both of you. Keep your POV out of the articles. You've been told countless times not to, and I believe you are intelligent enough to understand why. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 20:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

List of primary characters in Code Lyoko
Please stop adding your own opinions into articles, like here. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 23:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 03:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Your recent edit to Princess Jasmine has been reverted. Please do not insert POV or personal commentary into articles. Thank you.  Beemer 69  00:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Matthew Géczy
Hello, Angie. Please don't add original research to articles. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Please abide by WP:NPOV
Hello, Angie. Please don't insert POV into articles like you did to List of primary characters in Code Lyoko and Grandpa's Magical Toys. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have seen the show a few times, but it still your opinion. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You may yell all you like, it won't change anything. Your edits are POV. Practically everything you write is POV, I'm sorry to say. You have a consistent and frankly annoying problem in this regard, and it would save everyone a lot of trouble if you'd figure that out. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 03:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

There are far too many red links on the latter page, and I have almost no knowledge on ANY of those songs! HELP! Angie Y. (talk) 01:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Look, Angie, it doesn't matter if I've seen the show two times or two million times. It's still an opinion. Please realize that. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 03:44, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to List of Magic Knight Rayearth characters has been reverted. Sorry, but future edits containing blatant commentary and POV will now be considered vandalism, because despite numerous warnings, you don't seem to get the picture.  Beemer 69  03:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Angie, if you keep behaving like this I will go to WP:AN. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Please cool down
Angie, this edit was uncalled for. Several people here are correctly informing you that your additions are opinions. Comments written in wikipedia need to be verifiable. Your additions may well be true but if they are not verfiable in an independent source they should not be added to an article. The other users are correct to revert your edits. David D. (Talk) 03:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your conduct
Hello, Angie. I'm sorry, but mentoring isn't working. I went to WP:AN and started a topic. Feel free to comment, see. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tronborn.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tronborn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Editing Code Lyoko
Sixteen consecutive edits (in the primary character article) is ridiculous. Please familiarize yourself with the preview button. Thank you.  Beemer 69  06:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Aladdin (Disney character)
Angie, please stop adding opinions to articles. Others have told you about this many times before; please stop doing it. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

List of minor characters in the Teen Titans animated series
Angie, please stop inserting POV into articles. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 03:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

School diva
Please stop making edits to school diva that don't have reliable sources. I am working to support the article with really good content in order to keep it from being deleted - please wait a minute before editing it, and only add information that has sources. Thanks! • Freechild   'sup?   16:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. :) I'll let you add the info in. I'll just leave it alone. Angie Y. (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Seriously Angie, this article is being watched by more than one editor who wants to delete it. If you keep adding stuff without any kind of citation it comes across like a personal paper or something, and that doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. If it helps, look at a paperbound encyclopedia and read a few entries, then think to yourself, "How would they write about school divas?" Then find reliable sources and add to the article. Thanks - we're on the same team here. • Freechild   'sup?   16:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah okay. Angie Y. (talk) 18:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

So I've come back...
... to see that you've "left" (which is not a Wikibreak by the way). Try using

Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 13:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * To be truthful, you don't have to "retire" whenever things don't go your way. You, I, and we all know you'll come back tomorrow. Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 23:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You really "quit" this time? Sure. I doubt it. I'll bet a virtual cookie that you come back! Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 21:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, here's your cookie. [[Image:Choco chip cookie.png|thumb]]

AfD nomination of Barbara Weber-Scaff
An editor has nominated Barbara Weber-Scaff, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Grandpa's Magical Toys
I noticed the Rescue template you placed on Grandpa's Magical Toys. While I understand your desire to see this article remain at Wikipedia, the template is intended for articles that are currently undergoing an AfD discussion. I have replaced the tag with Expand, and I have placed the page on my watchlist in case someone decides to try to nominate it for deletion. But in the meantime, I suggest that you attempt to find some independent sources that can help prove the notability of this particular video of the Wee Sing series. -- RoninBK T C 13:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I did, by adding its IMDb page. Angie Y. (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What is "very special" (which itself comes off as a little self-centered) about this article that it needs to be rescued?  Beemer 69  03:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

People need to know about every aspect of it, that's what! Angie Y. (talk) 04:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: (slap)
Angie, you again inserted unsourced opinion into an article (Four poster bed) after fair warning was given not too long ago that any such offense would thereafter be considered vandalism, because you know the rules. And as for the "slaps you" comment, surely you can get your point across without being childish. Thanks.  Beemer 69  03:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Rugrats characters
An editor has nominated List of Rugrats characters, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Andrea Bocelli
I have again reverted your edit on the above article, as it was an unsourced highly POV personal comment. Please do not add personal comments into the article, especially unsourced. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 14:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Retirement
Hello, Angie. Why do you keep adding the retired template to your userpage? You are still an active user. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 23:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Pencak Silat
Angie, why do you keep telling me to take up the issue of the pop culture section with DanMat? It doesn't matter who wrote the material and it is not exclusive to the person who posted it. Most of the content therein was deleted because it is in-universe format and does not belong. Sorry to disappoint you, but Wikipedia is not a Lyoko fansite.  Beemer 69  23:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Oh be quiet! Regardless of what you say, regardless of whether or not it was in-universe, I am presenting facts from the series in regards to the martial art. You are not a Code Lyoko fan, so you can't judge me or what I contribute to Wikipedia! I am a part of the martial arts WikiProject, and I am doing what my duty is in that project. Angie Y. (talk) 23:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

 * They are indeed facts. I think it looks pretty good, and it does deserve a mention in the article. Plus, more information seems like a good thing to me. The section is for popular culture, and the two things mentioned there, Code Lyoko and Mortal Kombat, are indeed popular. JunKazamaFan (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

 * That's right, I am not a Lyoko fan, as is the case with many others. Therefore, the section needs to maintain a neutral viewpoint. You want to mention them, fine; simply mentioning that this character practices PS will suffice, rather than an essay consisting mostly of unimportant details non-fanboys who want to read up on PS couldn't care less about.  Beemer 69  00:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

For your information, I'm a girl! >:( Angie Y. (talk) 01:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

 * I'm aware of that. Plus, removal of the in-universe tags constitutes vandalism, as is reverting the removal of the nonsense edits and telling me to "go away." The tag has been replaced and you've been reported to an admin. Enough of this.  Beemer 69  01:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Angie, I know you are trying to help, but please see Manual of Style (writing about fiction). Statements require reliable sources. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello Angie. As some people have pointed out on your userpage, you are still editing, yet you have this template on your userpage. I respectfully request that you remove this template from your userpage, as you are evidently not retired. I know WP can be stressful sometimes; if you're feeling this way, perhaps you would rather just take a break? Thanks. seresin ( ¡? ) 08:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Agreed. Please note the following section in the policy on userpages:

 * "Removal of inappropriate content

 * If the community lets you know that they would rather you delete some content from your user space, you should consider doing so — such content is only permitted with the consent of the community. Alternatively, you could move the content to another site, and link to it.

 * If you do not cooperate, inappropriate content will eventually be removed, either by editing the page (if only part of it is inappropriate), or by redirecting it to your main user page (if it is entirely inappropriate)."

 * Having a template on your userpage when you are not retired is inappropriate and misleading. HtD (talk) 10:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Please be more civil
Angie, I know that you are only trying to help, but please be more civil towards others. That way, situations can be solved with less tension. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 23:51, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Please don't use my talk page as a place to blow off steam. If you need to calm down, perhaps talk to a friend off-wiki. Thanks. Seraphim♥  Whipp 16:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Behaviour
After reviewing certain comments you've made (,, , , spirit of edit warring) I'm giving you a formal warning now. Stop being incivil or you will be looking at a block (which will not be made by me, but another uninvolved admin). This is just another example of creating a negative environment. You've been given plenty of warnings; this is a last warning. Seraphim♥  Whipp 00:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Seriously. I've been "retired" for 3 months, and you STILL haven't cleaned up your act. GET. IT. TOGETHER. I honestly would have blocked you in February, even after I'd been REALLY nice to you. I've been looking at your activties since June 2007 (when you approached me about your anti-TTN revolt), and you have not changed. As I said before, Asperger's is NOT an excuse. My friend has Asperger's, and he is usually wonderful (just sometimes thinks you're saying something bad about him). STOP!!! STOP!!!! STOP!!! STOP!!! And now I'll stop rambling. (Ignore the "Thanks!". Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 18:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Massie Block
Angie, please abide by WP:NPOV; in the article Massie Block you called a character "good at doing nothing". JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 02:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Preview button
Angie, just a friendly note, about 55 of your past 500 edits have either "oops" or "whoops" in their summary and appear to be minor corrections to edits that you just made, so perhaps you should try using the "Show preview" button and proofread before you submit. Doctorfluffy (talk) 21:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Zeus Jim
I noticed the pic of Jim as Zeus in his Lyokan form with electric powers linked in one of the archives, pretty cool stuff. Tyciol (talk) 22:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Really? Are you a fan of Code Lyoko too? I conceptualized the idea for "Zeus Jim", and my friend Rhys Byron Davies drew it for me a few years ago. I still have both the sketched version and final colored version. The idea for Jim having the power over the element of lightning was my idea, yanno. And it makes sense, because Jim has been electrocuted quite a few times in the series, and lightning represents strength, too. He also isn't a fatso anymore. ;) Angie Y. (talk) 22:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages.  K C  109  01:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC).

Your edits to Sheeva have been reverted. I guess you'll never quit adding nonsensical opinions into articles until "no POV" is tattooed across your forehead.  Beemer 69  23:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Get away from me, you monster! Angie Y. (talk) 01:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Piguaquan
You are welcome but all I really did was clarify that the people referred to in the article were fictional people. :) Simonm223 (talk) 13:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I need help creating and justifying a similar section for Pencak Silat as well. Angie Y. (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Hello there. Thank you for your post. What do you think of my article Handlebars (song)? Thanks. JeanLatore (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Looks very promising! Excellent! What do you think of my article Pretty Little Dutch Girl? Angie Y. (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Looks great! I am sorry you have been harrassed and abused by other editors i have been treated the same way sometimes but i dont let it get me down. JeanLatore (talk) 02:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

My article needs a picture or two to illustrate it plus a history as to the song's creation. Angie Y. (talk) 15:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Yes perhaps you can 'sex it up' a bit ya know? I like it. JeanLatore (talk) 18:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm gonna need a little help with that. Plus, many good articles are being redirected by snobbish, elitist editors - the same ones that abuse me. Angie Y. (talk) 19:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes. What do you think about Esurance? JeanLatore (talk) 03:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Looks great! Angie Y. (talk) 03:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

hey babe. so vote at This featured article candidate. It's mine. And check out the rude comments left my User:SandyGeorgia. JeanLatore (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Original Research
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Artichokertalk 17:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello!
How are you doing? I hope you had a good weekend. Anyway, I proposed an idea at WP:VPP, go to near the end where I wrote the "Probation/Rehabiliation" proposal and tell me what you think please. All the best, JeanLatore (talk) 02:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

All right. Angie Y. (talk) 02:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

hi :)
thanks sweetie but i would like you to leave your opinion on the matter. JeanLatore (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages
I removed your question "I wonder what Sam would feel about the views of presumptive Republican Presidential nominee, John McCain? :)" from Talk:Sam the Eagle. I see you've been around a long time, but you might want to review WP:TALK. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

June 08
Please abide by NPOV and WP:OR--there's no reliable factual source in the world that supports referring to Barney in article space as "a dopey dinosaur". Thanks. Gladys J Cortez 19:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've just removed similar comments at Barney & Friends cast. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages again
Your addition of "My mom fed me this crud when it first came out, but I loved Sesame Street far more. Just wanted to let you know." on Talk:Barney & Friends, isn't helpful. Please stop being disruptive on talk pages. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * While on the subject, if you revert article content, as you did on Anti-Barney humor, please provide an explanation in the edit summary. Otherwise, it may be interpreted as edit warring. Beemer 69   chitchat  18:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there.
Hi how are you doing my friend? I hope things are going well. I would like you to read this recent opinion here, then contribute what you learned to the article of Boumediene v. Bush, a very important article on wikipedia. Thank you. JeanLatore (talk) 04:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey whats up did you read it yet? JeanLatore (talk) 20:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

List of Pokémon anime characters
Hi, I would just like to inform you that you have added POV statements to List of Pokémon anime characters. Please remember to abide by WP:NPOV, as your addition "(yet completely annoying)" violates this rule. Thanks. Artichoker[talk] 19:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Your edit to Aelita has again been reverted. The trivia section is unencyclopedic, and your edit therein was speculatory and had nothing to do with the topic (please stop looking for excuses to insert Code Lyoko references into articles). Also, the next time you don't include a reasonable explanation in the edit summary when you revert article content, it may be considered vandalism because you're coming across as engaging in an edit war out of defensiveness for the subject (WP:OWN) rather than the good of the article. Beemer 69  chitchat  04:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from inserting personal opinions into edit summaries, as you did to Anti-Barney humor. On a side note, the Barney series will not turn 20 until the year 2012. Beemer 69  chitchat  02:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

The series is so harmful to children that it should get its ass kicked by Sesame Street. Angie Y. (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Pretty Little Dutch Girl
Sorry I can't help. Based on the use of the word 'Jello', it seems to have an obvious American origin from not earlier than 1902, when the word was first used as a trademark. JMcC (talk) 19:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Neverland as a dream
Rather than continuing to add it back every time someone deletes it, why don't you find some third-party source that presents the argument that Neverland was all a dream, and cite it. As it is, what you keep adding really isn't any better than Original Research. - JasonAQuest (talk) 19:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Look, just watch the END OF THE MOVIE, and you'll see for yourself.. Angie Y. (talk) 20:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

 * I've seen it. I can see how you might interpret it that way, but I can also see how someone might simply conclude that the kids came home and went to sleep as if they had never been away.  (Like they did in the book.)  If the "dream" interpretation were as self-evident as you seem to think, other people wouldn't keep removing it.  But since you seem such a fan of it, I'm suggesting a way for you to get that viewpoint accepted into Wikipedia: by documenting the fact that you didn't just come up with it yourself.  Don't argue with me or anybody else whether it's correct (which is pointless); find an independent source for it.  If you persist in adding this interpretation into articles without providing a citation for it, you should get used to other people following Wikipedia protocol and deleting it as the personal theory that it seems to be. - JasonAQuest (talk) 00:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Who says this? Provide a citation. - JasonAQuest (talk) 18:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. --Clubjuggle T/ C 17:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

 * It's not libelous; it is an official press conference. Angie Y. (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You need to cite a reliable source, then, which YouTube isn't. If this were true, I would imagine the media would be all over it, and I'm not seeing the allegation reported anywhere. --Clubjuggle T/ C 18:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Furthermore, some guy getting up in front of reporters and saying something, is not even remotely the same thing as "Barack Obama has admitted" that it happened! That was libel, Angie. - JasonAQuest (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Let me rephrase that, then. Larry Sinclair has admitted to having homosexual relationships with Barack Obama. Is that alright now? Angie Y. (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

 * I admit to being the founder of Microsoft. That doesn't make it true. We need a reliable, independent source. --Clubjuggle T/ C 20:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

:)
--PeaceNT (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Cheers and happy editing!

Hi there! Several of my favorite articles are gone, like the Grandpa's Magical Toys one. Angie Y. (talk) 12:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

POV
You've been warned about your POV editing repeatedly. Knock it off. Your opinion is meaningless to the article, as is your interpretation of a single episode. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I know about your conflict with User:FalconPunch2, and I'm on his side. So, I'm saying this to you kindly. Stop reverting September 3 or suffer the consequences of YOUR actions. Thank you. Angie Y. (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

 * And he's indefinitely blocked now. That should tell you something. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 01:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

 * You need to understand that threatening other users, calling them names, and other forms of playground behavior are contrary to Wikipedia policies. Putting a disclaimer like "I'm saying this to you kindly" does not excuse this kind of uncivil behavior. - JasonAQuest (talk) 03:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please stop adding unnecessary cruft to MK-related articles, as you continue to do with Shao Kahn. Saying he has a "God complex" is opinion, and excess information about who or what worships him in the TV series is in-universe and unimportant. Plus, you need to quit assuming that I or anyone else haven't watched the episodes simply because we remove content that has no place at all in the article. Beemer 69  chitchat  05:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, where can it go then? The list of episodes? Angie Y. (talk) 14:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Have you considered that maybe it doesn't belong in Wikipedia? - JasonAQuest (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

The Question of Barack Obama's Place of Birth
ObamaCrimes.com states the following on Barack Obama's REAL place of birth:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss on the last day to file a response, for the obvious purpose of delaying Court action in the case of Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Their joint motion indicates a concerted effort to avoid the truth by delaying the judicial process, although legal, by not resolving the issue presented: that is, whether Barack Obama was “natural born.”

It is obvious that Obama was born in Kenya and does not meet the “qualifications” to be President of the United States pursuant to our United States Constitution. Obama cannot produce a certified copy of his “Vault” [original long version] Birth Certificate from Hawaii because it does not exist.

Angie Y. (talk) 22:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Stop right now. The editors at Barack Obama, left, right, and center, will not tolerate pushing such a laughably horrible source as "Obamacrimes.com". I strongly remind you that the article is on probation, and by insisting on introducing your conspiracy theories into an article about a living person, you risk being blocked. -- Good Damon 12:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Regarding new page Berg v. Obama: "obamacrimes.com" can hardly be called a reputable, impartial source: It is in fact run by Berg! Besides, Berg v. Obama is NOT the page to discuss what we personally think about whether Obama is qualified to become President, and it is NOT the page where we try to argue Berg v. Obama ourselves. We are not the lawyers, litigants or judges here. We are only to be recording the facts on this case as it progresses.

True. Speaking of which, it's running through some parts of the mainstream media, namely Fox Toledo News. Angie Y. (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Zad68 (talk) 15:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Barack Obama Article Probation
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed is on article probation. -- Brothejr (talk) 12:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
It's not necessary to provide the same old lengthy explanation of the Shao Kahn/Mileena program scene in the edit summary over and over again, as it's irrelevant to why the edit has ever been reverted before. sixty nine  • speak, I say •  01:22, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I get it. I do wanna say that Mileena loved being beautiful, though. Angie Y. (talk) 01:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Your edits to the Teen Titans character article have again been reverted. It is unsourced and unofficial material that does not belong, as fansite opinion is not a viable source. Unless the show's creators or a legitimate third-party source explicitly reveal the inspiration for the character, it stays off, and I couldn't find any such information that you alleged came from the site. Lastly, your persistent reversion of the page without any explanation in the edit summary constitutes edit warring and needs to stop. Your cooperation is appreciated. sixty nine  • spill it •  05:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Manning
I have, again, reverted your addition to James David Manning, as it constitutes original research. I see that you have some history of tendentious and hot-headed editing, and I suggest you discuss on the talk page to gain consensus for your edits on that page. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Could I trouble you to add the source to the article, not simply to put it in the edit summary. As things stand, your edit is still not accompanied by a reference on the page.  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

It's on Google Video. Angie Y. (talk) 19:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

 * So then add it. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Angie Y. (talk) 04:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Citizenship conspiracy theories
You've just unilaterally moved Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories against consensus on that talk page. Please revert immediately. This seems disurptive and is, at best, unexplained. After you restore, you can make an argument for this move on the talk page.Bali ultimate (talk) 17:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Page move
I have undone your move of the Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories since there has been (mind numbingly) extensive discussion on its talk page regarding this article name and the current consensus seems to be against any change. If you feel strongly about the issue, do feel free to start a new discussion on the talk page - although I should warn you it would mean kissing your weekend goodbye :) Abecedare (talk) 17:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

 * I concur. As a person who has swam uphill through mud in an attempt to get the name changed, I can assure you the resistance of those who "don't want the title changed to anything that lends this nonsense even a scintilla of credibility" is quite strong. I think it fairly certain that another renaming discussion at this time would be met by significant amounts of irritation and exasperation by those who oppose and anything resembling consensus would be near impossible. JBarta (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Count Paris
Hi Angie,

Regarding this edit. The begging and starving, etc., are the effects of her father disowning her; he isn't proposing to actively turn her into a beggar (however one would go about that), just pointing out what will be the inevitable effects should he disown her. Shakespeare includes them for dramatic purposes, but Wikipedia doesn't need to dramatize its articles, if you see the distinction I'm aiming for. Personally I would encourage you to self-revert that edit. --Xover (talk) 15:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah, okay. I also made an edit to Did You Ever See a Lassie? as well. Angie Y. (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Angie!
This is Interrobang, remember me?

Anyway, I see you've made tons of progress but you're still not quite there. If you need help, give me a shout-out. '''Thanks! (and I'll stop rambling now)''', ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 17:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Remember me? ~  Keiji (iNVERTED)  ( Talk )  22:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I do. Angie Y. (talk) 02:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * AWESOME ~  Keiji (iNVERTED)  ( Talk )  09:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Matt Rozier is gone. I miss him. Angie Y. (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Who's Matt Rozier? ~  Keiji (iNVERTED)  ( Talk )  01:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

A very old friend of mine. AOL: zimcrim Angie Y. (talk) 01:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Yours or his? we should probably talk on AIM instead. =p ~  Keiji (iNVERTED)  ( Talk )  15:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. Angie Y. (talk) 16:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Having said that, you don't seem to be online at all. ~  Keiji (iNVERTED)  ( Talk )  14:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

What is your AIM address? Angie Y. (talk) 17:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

 * ~  Keiji (iNVERTED)  ( Talk )  12:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Language help
Hi.

There is some debate here as to whether these two girls are birth twins or just two girls who look alike. One user states

"双生児 is the Japanese for birth-twins, while Airi and Meiri are ふたご which means twin (look-a-like) which is how they were advertised." but gives no evidence for this.

I have consulted my dictionary which says:

双子 [ふたご] twins, a twin.

双子座 [ふたござ] Gemini

二子 [ふたご] twins, a twin

二心 [ふたごころ] duplicity, treachery, double-dealing

and

一卵性双生児 [いちらんせいそうせいじ] identical twins

結合双生児 [けつごうそうせいじ] conjoined twins

双生児 [そうせいじ] twins.

二卵性双生児 [にらんせいそうせいじ] fraternal twins

so it is still not clear! Please could you let me know what the translations of 双生児 and ふたご are?

Thanks pablo <sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">hablo. 14:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Nursery rhymes and singing games
Hi there. I was thinking we should probably talk. I am afraid I don't have an aim account.--Sabrebd (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

I found and illustration for Did You Ever See a Lassie here. And I need help finding an illustration for Pretty Little Dutch Girl as well. Angie Y. (talk) 19:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Your recent edit to Gaston (Beauty and the Beast) has been reverted. Please do not insert POV or personal commentary into articles. Thank you. Cactusjump (talk) 16:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Your revision of the Energy Vampire article
I wanted to say thank you for your attempt at restoring sections of this article as well as forewarn you that you might be stepping into a potential minefield. The Energy Vampire and Vampire Lifestyle articles - as well as a few others - have been fraught with accusations of promotion and sock puppetry from a number of sources. Your best bet would be to make sure you cite any and all changes you do, reference third party reliable sources as much as possible, and take anything anyone says - myself included - with a big, heaping spoon of salt.--SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

 * You're welcome. Angie Y. (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Schoolmarm (teacher)
I have nominated Schoolmarm (teacher), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Schoolmarm (teacher). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <span style="padding:2px;background: #cccccc; color: #0000cc; BORDER-RIGHT: #6699cc 3px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #6699cc 3px solid;"> 7   talk   01:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Schoolmarm (teacher)
A tag has been placed on Schoolmarm (teacher) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Andy Berman
I have nominated Andy Berman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Andy Berman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I'm starting this at pretty high severity warning because I see you have a loooong history of this sort of problematic edit. DMacks (talk) 18:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Mighty Morphin Power Rangers World Tour Live on Stage
I saw that you had put the same plot section back into this article a few months ago. I had removed it for various reasons mostly because it is in no way encyclopedic.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 06:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Try to make it encyclopedic then. Angie Y. (talk) 14:44, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * That's not how it works.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 00:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to various Romeo and Juliet related articles
Hi Angie Y.,

I've noticed over the last several months you've made quite a few edits to articles related to Romeo and Juliet, particularly the ones that relate most directly to Juliet (i.e. Lord Capulet, Lady Capulet, Count Paris, etc.). While I'm overjoyed to see more editors take an interest in the Shakespeare related articles on Wikipedia, I'm concerned that your edits appear to consistently introduce more colourful and emotive language. While I appreciate that you may have a personal emotional affinity for the character, Wikipedia's language should be neutral, properly referenced, and not contain original research. The way of writing that you seem to have used in some of these edits is often called Editorializing (making subjective value judgements) and very problematic under the Neutral Point of View and No Original Research policies. For example, elaborating on how harshly Lord Capulet treats Juliet, and how Lady Capulet does not support her, when she refuses to marry Paris may evoke an emotional response from the reader, but the policy on Wikipedia is to simply present the reader with the facts, properly cited to a reliable source, and allow them to make up their own minds. Editing in this way is quite difficult, I know, on a subject were one has a personal attachment of some sort; so to avoid any potential of this creating some sort of conflict in the future, I would like to suggest that you voluntarily refrain from editing any of the Romeo and Juliet related articles until you feel confident in yourself that you can do so without slipping into this category of problem.

Far be it from me to go around telling other editors on Wikipedia what to edit and how to do so, but I also do think that these many small edits are in aggregate becoming a problem for the quality of the articles in question (which, I am quite certain, is not your intent). What do you think? Could this be a workable solution? Can you think of any other way to resolve this problem? --Xover (talk) 17:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

 * Well, first off, Lord Capulet threatens to disown Juliet thus turning her into a street child. Second, there should be a description or two on Count Paris' true intentions with Juliet - does he want to marry her for love or does he want to marry her simply because her family is rich? Angie Y. (talk) 22:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

 * Oh, certainly. I'm not in any way suggesting you've added irrelevant material, or that these issues should not be covered. I'm simply worried about the way in which it's been added. When you place so much emphasis on these issues, and describe them with such emotionally loaded words, the neutrality of the article is compromised. Please don't misunderstand my intentions here: I do, of course, think your contributions are valuable—and, as mentioned, I'm always happy to see more people interested in improving the Shakespeare related articles on Wikipedia—and there's nothing wrong with editing only in those areas where you have a personal interest. But I've discussed the specific way you've edited these articles once before and you still seem to be having a little trouble with finding the right “voice” (neutral, not passing any implicit value judgements) for this subject. That's why I suggested that perhaps it would be easier if you simply refrained from editing these specific articles until you feel more comfortable with the proper encyclopedic language to use. Perhaps you could suggest any such needed changes on the talk pages of the articles first, and let another editor try to formulate it into encyclopedic language for you? As an alternative, try to find a good scholarly source for these things to see how they talk about these issues, and make sure you cite every addition to that. For the articles related to Romeo and Juliet, the following are the main sources:
 * Any good library or bookstore should have these available. --Xover (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Any good library or bookstore should have these available. --Xover (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Any good library or bookstore should have these available. --Xover (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Taxpayer March on Washington
This edit was unhelpful. It might not have been your intent, but your edit twisted the facts. The signs were promoting Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories; they were not promoting "Obama's natural born status". Your edit summary, "I don't see any conspiracy anymore than you ever should.", speaks for itself. <font color="#000080">APK  <font color="#99BADD">is a GLEEk 23:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Renaissance Center podium
Saw your note on the Renaissance Center talk page. Let me know if you have any sources or more information about the podium that you know of that we don't have. We know the base is built on a 14 acre site and we know the square feet of the podium structures beneath the towers. Haven't located the dimensions of length and width for the base itself. Thanks. Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

All I know is that the podium is a teenage shopper's dream come true. =D Angie Y. (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi, Angie. I'm Interrobang², do you remember me? I've been off the project for quite some time, but I plan on returning. I was wondering if perhaps you'd like to start up our mentor thing again, or just talk? '''Thanks! (and I'll stop rambling now)''', ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 17:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Angie Y.! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Wally Wingert -
 * 2) Matthew Géczy -
 * 3) Jodi Forrest -
 * 4) Hiroki Shimowada -

AfD nomination of Wee Sing Video Series
An article that you have been involved in editing, Wee Sing Video Series, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Robofish (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

capitalist creed
I noticed you put a redlink in for this, are you intending to write an article on this? - Stillwaterising (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Maybe, if I find more information on it. Angie Y. (talk) 21:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rklawton (talk) 04:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Violet Beauregarde
Do NOT continue adding unsourced, original research material into our articles. This simply isn't allowed, and if you continue, you will find yourself blocked from editing. DO feel free to improve our articles with reliable sourced material at your convenience. Do NOT restore unsourced material which has been deleted unless you also include a reliable source supporting it. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to bring them up on the relevant article's talk page. You may find yourself surprised at how eager editors are to help those working diligently to improve our articles. If, on the other hand, you feel the need to express your opinions on a particular subject, please feel free to do so on your own blog or via some other means. Just don't do it in Wikipedia's articles. Rklawton (talk) 04:05, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Uncited original research
Angie, I see that you've been told many times that you need to not add your personal opinion to articles without having reliable sources to back it up. Can you please try to remember this? Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Ah, sure. Angie Y. (talk) 23:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Priceline.com. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. <font style="bold italic" color="7C0500">Harry the Dog <font color="0000FF">WOOF 15:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

AN/I
You are being discussed at Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. I suspect there will be no consensus for a ban, but you really need to stop adding inappropriate content to Wikipedia. You are likely to be blocked from editing if you do not. Friday (talk) 15:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Community ban proposal
I have proposed that you be banned from Wikipedia for a year for continually violating the community norms for editing here. Please see the discussion at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
Angie -

I believe that you came to Wikipedia with the intent to contribute positively. However, reviewing your edit history and warnings history, it's clear that you have consistently edited in ways which are not compatible with the project's core goal (building an encyclopedia) and core values (WP:PILLARS).

It's regrettable to have come to the point that we are at now - multiple people have tried to talk to you about your editing problems going back several years. There was an attempted mentoring in 2008, and other attempts to engage constructively. It appears that you did not understand or take them seriously.

As many others have said, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, full of facts, not personal opinions. You have consistently violated that in multiple ways - one, by inserting your personal opinion into multiple articles (recent example: at Priceline.com), and two, by adding information generally without providing reliable reference sources (see our policies on reliable sources and on source verifiability).

A month's worth of this type of issue would not be that big a deal. Four plus years of it is too much.

Again - I believe you came here and have been editing in good faith. If we come to the point that we can see that you understand these policies and would edit in a way compatible with them going forwards, I would expect that we can undo the block and let you proceed to edit again. Any administrator can undo this block if we have good evidence from discussion here on your talk page that you do understand the core policies here and will edit properly going forwards.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

 * If you understand, why is it that you've failed to change when you've been warned (repeatedly) in the past? Ironholds (talk) 01:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

 * If your long-term problematic edit pattern is due to personal issues, then it's best for the project if you don't edit until those issues are resolved. You need to get your behavior under control, we can't let you continue to be a problem here regardless of whether the problem is really under your control or has some deeper cause. Again, your behavior is the problem and that problem must stop. This block appears to be the only thing that will stop it (especially if as you say there are deeper issues at work here). DMacks (talk) 01:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't want to not be a part of this project. By blocking me, you're shutting me out of it. Angie Y. (talk) 01:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

 * That's a shame. Perhaps you should have thought about that during the several years you were repeatedly warned about why your participation was inappropriate. You have proven repeatedly that you are not able to participate by the standards of this site, therefore you should not. Please stop wasting our time here. We really don't respond to begging, only to getting the problem solved. Your behavior has been a long-term problem that you were unable to solve, therefore we have solved it. DMacks (talk) 01:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

 * Block - I support the block. Angie, you play by your own rules - an approach best suited to blogging. I wish you every success.  Best wishes, Rklawton (talk) 02:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion
I think the only way you're going to get unblocked is by proposing content changes here which are provable WP:NPOV and properly sourced to reliable independent sources. Try making some suggestions, several people are watching this page. Guy (Help!) 11:16, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm too scared and heartbroken to. Angie Y. (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * As someone on the autism spectrum myself (PDD-NOS, mercifully mild, but still), I know it won't be easy to convince the community. JzG/Guy seems to be onto something here, and it's at least worth a shot.  What have you got to lose at this point?  I know it can feel like talking to a wall, but don't worry- people are listening.  You seem to be interested in show-related articles, so maybe you could check for mistranslations of Japanese names, or find an article that needs to be flushed of a POV.  That's an area that's fairly high-traffic, and several people can examine it.  Don't worry about the people who are brushing you off- I'm sure you can be helpful here.  They'll back off when you can prove them wrong, and I'm sure all of them are hoping to be proven wrong.  Go for it!!  The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 07:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, just that. Your situation is unfortunate but Wikipedia is not therapy so I'm afraid it's very much up to you to learn how to fit in here. Guy (Help!) 09:37, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If I can manage, I think almost anyone can. I hope she'll at least give it a try.  The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 13:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, Angie
Do you remember me? You first encountered me a few years ago during the TTN debacle, and from then I always made sure I kept up with you. Jetlover and I really wanted to help, and I felt that we really made some progress. However, it didn't seem to be enough, and you were banned. Whether this is because of your refusal to change, or the community's to help you, but I truly feel that you deserve a place in the project. I'd love to come back onto Wiki after a 3-year hiatus, and have you as a top priority. '''Thanks! (and I'll stop rambling now)''', ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 14:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Angie Y. (talk) 15:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Help, Interrobang!

Bali ultimate is a liar. Nanette's section is NOT vandalism! All the information in her section IS ACTUAL INFORMATION FROM THE SHOW. Angie Y. (talk) 14:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

 * It's trivial, and it's all unsourced original research. What you wrote would be excellent material for a blog but not for Wikipedia.  The fact that you don't understand this difference is why I wholeheartedly support your banning.  Rklawton (talk) 15:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Angie_Y.&diff=365224228&oldid=365034078 SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * To clarify, I'm well-aware that you're already blocked -- that was a warning that you could be reblocked with your talk-page access disabled. You've been offered some good suggestions on how to return to the community -- I would recommend that you follow them. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Angie, many fo your edits are not appropriate for an encyclopedia, but Wikia perhaps. You've be given links to the appropriate Wiki policy pages for years, but it has apparently not sunk in. I'm sure many (myself included) would love to help you actually understand it after all of this time, but you must reach out yourself. '''Thanks! (and I'll stop rambling now)''', ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 00:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Notes on ANI discussion
As I think you're aware, there's a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding this recent block. I don't believe it's necessary, and while my suggestions haven't been fully agreed with, I think you should look at that discussion because even those that advocate this block envision you returning to the community to continue to edit. I hope you'll do so. I hope you'll take this advise and return to editing, with the concerns expressed recently in mind. I look forward to seeing you back again soon. Shadowjams (talk) 06:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

?
On your ANI section, many editors suggested that you give ideas on how you can edit properly with sources and in a non-or way. Do you have anythink you'd like to give us? I don't want you to be banned forever. Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 17:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, in regards to the characters section on the Angela Anaconda article, most of the information about the characters is true to form. And in regards to Veruca Salt's theatrical variations, all of that info is true too. Angie Y. (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

 * "Truth is not the criteria for inclusion of any idea or statement in a Wikipedia article... The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth — that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true (my emphasis). This is important to bear in mind when writing about topics on which you as a contributor have a strong opinion; you might think that it is a great place to set the record straight and Right Great Wrongs, but that’s not the case. We can record the righting of great wrongs, but we can’t ride the crest of the wave. We cannot be the correctors and educators of the world. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views. (again my emphasis)" Please read and digest that paragraph, as what it says is at the heart of the problems you are having editing Wikipedia. If you can understand what that paragraph says, and act on it, then you would be welcomed back I'm sure. <font style="bold italic" color="7C0500">Harry the Dog <font color="0000FF">WOOF 19:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikia
Try that one; and there are many others. You could be an admin there. No one will mind your style. Collaborate with people who love what you love. Jack Merridew 18:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * codelyoko

Yes, it would be great if you migrated to Wikia. I remember seeing your contributions to the Code Lyoko Wiki on editthis. Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 18:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Sock puppet
I suspect Angie has now started up a sock puppet account (User:Mencken2010) to evade her block. The pattern of edits is the same: unsourced opinions on some (or all?) of the same articles she's already obsessed over. If the editing pattern continues, then I recommend submitting these two accounts to checkuser. Rklawton (talk) 15:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * There are also similarities with 71.211.201.70 . – sgeureka t•c 18:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Good call. We can add that IP to the checkuser case if it needs to go that far.  Rklawton (talk) 20:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I dids not sockpuppet. I wasn't even here. I was on vacation for a week. Angie Y. (talk) 15:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Filming location inquiry
I need help finding out the name of the house that was used as a filming location for Veruca Salt's home in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Angie Y. (talk) 03:35, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The house was called Frank, but its mother called him "Franky". Rklawton (talk) 04:17, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm serious. This is part of expansion of the Roald Dahl wiki on Wikia. Angie Y. (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:CODE LYOKO2 SCN-8.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CODE LYOKO2 SCN-8.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006-08-13

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 22:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!
Thanks! Sure hope there's some Splenda in there. Angie Y. (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sleeping gas

The article Sleeping gas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
 * There are no references cited to support notability of the article subject WP:GNG. a Google search revealed no WP:RS compliant sources to support notability. Most statements in this article are unsourced WP:OR. The only referenced part of the article, "Bolivian Rapes", is better suited to be merged with the article Incapacitating agent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. loupgarous (talk) 03:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mother May I? for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mother May I? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mother May I? until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. That man from Nantucket (talk) 06:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Why is this article being deleted? Angie Y. (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Jodi Forrest for deletion
Mother May I? was speedy kept. However, an editor has now nominated Jodi Forrest for deletion. If you know of sources that can be used to improve it, you may want to use the template to ask for your statement to be copied over to the discussion. Don't sock or edit logged out, though! Yngvadottir (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew Géczy

The article Matthew Géczy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "While a prolific voice actor, subject does not pass WP:BASIC – a couple of very incidental mentions in Variety, but nothing in the other Hollywood 'trade'-focused media publications such as LA Times' or Deadline Hollywood'', etc. Also article has been effectively unsourced since at least 2009 (IMDb doesn't count...)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Himeko

The article Himeko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "No notability, fails WP:NNAME, no reliable sources found."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Ling Xiaoyu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ling Xiaoyu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ling Xiaoyu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Himeko for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Himeko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Himeko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Spoiled child for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spoiled child is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Spoiled child until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. <b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 03:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Angie Y.


text: User talk:68.209.113.208

title: User talk:68.209.113.208


text:
Talk:Descriptive representation

From my (cursory) reading on the web, it seems to me that the term "descriptive representation" is used to argue that government should have the same composition (gender and ethnic) as the population that they represent, and not that, for instance, a female representative should only represent the interests of women. Matt 00:43, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree, so I changed "should only represent" to "should be represented by". —PrologFan {Talk} 20:28, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Descriptive representation


text:
Imaculado Coração de Maria

Imaculado Coração de Maria (Immaculate Heart of Mary) is a civil parish in the municipality of Funchal in the archipelago of Madeira. Imaculado Coração de Maria, which is Portuguese for The Immaculate Heart of Mary, is a suburb of Funchal. The population in 2011 was 6,207, in an area of 1.36 km2.

History
At the end of the 20th century, the growth of Funchal along the Ribeira de Santa Luzia and along the Monte Railway (which linked Funchal until Terreiro da Luta) caused the growth in settlement along the rural roadways, forcing the creation of new industries and further settlement. Meanwhile, along the coast of Funchal, new groups of residential and leisure-related activities, with parks and exotic gardens began to progressively replace older rural activities. With the occupation of lower Funchal by factories, the zones of habitation began to progressively appear around Funchal, forming new nodes of new activity. In 1940, the city of Funchal underwent a profound renovation, spearheaded by Dr. Fernão Ornelas, that resulted in a modernization of the infrastructures to complement the tourist industry; there was new construction, alterations to improve accessibility, the paving of new roadways, new administrative buildings, hotels and waterworks to support the increasing number of services along the coast.

Imaculado Coração de Maria was one of the emerging communities around central Funchal. Since the beginning of the 20th century, the faith community had shown their devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, especially with the residency of Charles I of Austria, who was a devotee and who would later die while in exile (February 1922).

On 26 November 1954, Imaculado Coração de Maria was elevated to the status of civil parish, due to the significant demographic increases.

At about the same time, a new parish church was ordered constructed by diocese prelate, D. António Manuel Ribeiro. The large project was designed by architect Chorão Ramalho, who in turn produced a large modern building plan, or basilica, that was only completed 40 years later (it would be one of the modern projects best associated with the Portuguese architect during the 20th century).

Geography
The parish is best described as a similar in form to a "number six" located north of São Pedro, in the urbanized beltway of Funcal. Its limits are delineated in the west by a long strip that includes the Rua da Torrinha (and the older Caminho de Ferro), Estrada do Monte (São Roque) and the ravine of Ribeira de Santa Luzia which flows through to the Atlantic, and a circular area enveloped by the bridge of Torreão (over the Ribeira de Santa Luzia) and east by the Rua da Levada and Estrada de Livramento.

The construction of the primary school EB2/3 Escola Básica de Bartolomeu Perestrelo (Barolomeu Perestrelo Primary School), with a capacity for 2000 students, has turned this parish into a new central place for Funchal, with the concentration of new residents in the community.

title: Imaculado Coração de Maria


text:
Slick Willie

Slick Willie or Slick Willy may refer to:

 * Willie Brown (politician), former California legislator and San Francisco mayor
 * Bill Clinton, former president of the United States
 * W. W. Herenton, former mayor of Memphis
 * Willie Sutton, a prolific bank robber
 * Willy Wise, boxer
 * William Nylander, NHL forward

title: Slick Willie