text:
Valery Kokov

Valery Mukhamedovich Kokov (Валерий Мухамедович Коков; КӀуэкӀуэ Мухьэмэд и къуэ Валерий, K'uək'uə Muhəməd i Quə Valeriy October 18, 1941 – October 29, 2005) was a Soviet and Russian politician of Kabardian ethnicity.

Early life and political career
Kokov was born in Tyrnyauz, Kabardino-Balkaria. He was the leader of Kabardino-Balkaria from 1990 to 2005. He was chairman of the republic's supreme Soviet from 1990 to 1991 and was elected President for the first time in 1992.

He effectively neutralized opposition and was re-elected twice in landslide victories; in 1997 with 98% of the vote and in 2002 with 87% of the vote. He successfully maintained stability in the republic though it is close to the war-torn republic of Chechnya. Kokov suffered from cancer for several years before his death. On February 23, 2005, he announced his resignation.

Resignation and Death
He did not give any reason for his departure, which came nearly a year and a half before the end of his term. He stayed in office until his successor, Arsen Kanokov was chosen two weeks later. During October 2005 his health rapidly declined and he died in the central clinical hospital in Moscow of cancer, a month after leaving office. He is survived by his daughter, son and his wife.

Personal life
Kokov was married to Violetta Taubievna Kokova, and they had one daughter and one son, Kazbek Kokov, who became head of KBR in 2018.

Honours and awards

 * Order "For Merit to the Fatherland";
 * 2nd class (9 May 2005) – for outstanding contribution strengthening Russian statehood and many years of diligent work
 * 3rd class (15 October 2001) – for outstanding contribution strengthening Russian statehood, friendship and cooperation between nations
 * Order of Friendship of Peoples (25 March 1994) – for his great personal contribution to strengthening Russian statehood and stability of international relations in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic
 * Order of the Red Banner of Labour
 * Order "Honor and Glory", 2nd class (Abkhazia, 2003)
 * Diploma of the Government of the Russian Federation (11 October 2001) – for his great personal contribution to the economy of Kabardino-Balkaria and long-term fruitful work

Kokov's name has been used:
 * Kabardino-Balkarian State Agricultural Academy named VM Kokov, Nalchik
 * Streets in Volgograd, Grozny and Dygulybgey, Baksan region, Kabardino-Balkaria

title: Valery Kokov


text:
Slapp Happy

Slapp Happy was a German/English avant-pop group, formed in Germany in 1972. Their lineup consisted of Anthony Moore (keyboards), Peter Blegvad (guitar) and Dagmar Krause (vocals). The band members moved to England in 1974 where they merged with Henry Cow, but the merger ended soon afterwards and Slapp Happy split up. Slapp Happy's sound was characterised by Dagmar Krause's unique vocal style. From 1982 there have been brief reunions to create an opera called Camera, record the album Ça Va in 1998, and perform shows around the world.

Germany
Slapp Happy was formed in 1972 in Hamburg, Germany by British experimental composer Anthony Moore. Moore had recorded two avant-garde/experimental solo LPs at Faust's studio in Wümme, Bremen, Germany for Polydor Records. When he presented them with a third album, they rejected it, stating that they wanted something more commercial. Moore obliged and asked his American friend, Peter Blegvad to come to Hamburg and help him write some pop songs. Blegvad recalls responding, "Pop songs. Three-chord stuff. How hard can that be ...?" For them it was a joke. They said, "we'll take the piss out of pop."

Calling themselves Slapp Happy, Moore and Blegvad wrote the song "Just a Conversation" in 20 minutes. They recorded it in Faust's studio with Faust's rhythm section backing them. But when the pair found their singing was not working, they asked Moore's girlfriend (and future wife), Dagmar Krause to sing. She had sung previously on stage and in several groups, but wanted to stop. Reluctantly, however, she agreed to sing, and transformed Slapp Happy from a joke into something unexpected. American music academic Benjamin Piekut said "Krause's voice possessed a levity and grace that was shot through with world-weary Lenyiana." Now a trio, Slapp Happy presented Polydor with "Just a Conversation", and were surprised when the label released it as a single in 1972, backed by "Jumping Jonah", another pop ditty they had recorded. Polydor also gave them a record deal.

Moore and Blegvad continued writing "naive rock", as Blegvad described it, and when they had enough songs, the trio returned to Wümme in May 1972 to record Sort Of, their debut album. Once again, Faust were their backing band. The LP was released later in 1972, but did not sell well, primarily because Slapp Happy refused to perform live. In late 1972 Slapp Happy began recording their second album, Casablanca Moon with Faust. The songs here were more sophisticated and artful than those on Sort Of. Moore's music was harmonically richer, and Blegvad's lyrics more serious and poetic. Blegvad said, "We were snobs about pop music ... Anthony was more interested in making modern classical music." But they acknowledged that their attempts at commercial music were naïve and called their approach "the Douanier Rousseau sound", after the self-taught French artist. But Polydor did not like the direction Slapp Happy were taking and rejected the album.

England
In early 1973, Slapp Happy left Germany for England. Henry Cow, who had recently signed a record deal with the then emerging Virgin Records, heard a cassette tape of the trio's rejected second album, and were impressed and recommended that Virgin sign them. The record label, however, was concerned about how receptive English audiences would be to Krause's German accent. But after several other musicians and critics advocated them, including Robert Wyatt and Ian MacDonald in New Musical Express, Virgin added Slapp Happy to their roster later in 1973.

Soon after signing, Slapp Happy went to Virgin's Manor Studios in Oxfordshire in early 1974 to re-record Casablanca Moon. Blegvad said Virgin felt that their unreleased second album was "a good demo, but too crude for radio, so we re-recorded the same songs with swisher production". Session musicians were used, under the direction of violinist Graham Preskett, with new arrangements of the songs by Roger Wootton of Comus. Virgin released the album as Slapp Happy in May 1974. The new recording attracted the attention of the press, particularly after Wyatt endorsed it. But Henry Cow were not so complimentary. Blegvad remembers them saying, "Well, it's OK, the songs aren't bad, but it's really a missed opportunity. You made a conventional pop record and you could have done something more."

It was not until 1980 that Recommended Records released the original Casablanca Moon (with Faust) as Acnalbasac Noom (the words of the original title written backwards). Comparison of the two releases revealed two very different musical arrangements. Acnalbasac Noom had a raw and unsophisticated feel about it, whereas Slapp Happy tended to be more sentimental with more complex arrangements, including a string orchestra.

In June 1974, there were plans for a joint appearance by Slapp Happy and Virgin label mates Henry Cow and Wyatt at a free concert in Hyde Park in London, but this was cancelled at the last minute. However, on 25 June Slapp Happy recorded a Top Gear session for the BBC, enlisting the help of former and current Cow members Geoff Leigh, Fred Frith and Lindsay Cooper, plus Wyatt, who contributed guest vocals and percussion to a version of Blegvad's "A Little Something" from Casablanca Moon. Credited as "Slapp Happy & Friends", this was later released in 1994 on Wyatt's compilation album, Flotsam Jetsam.

Slapp Happy returned to the studio in May 1974 to record two new compositions with session musicians, "Europa" and "War (Is Energy Enslaved)". Virgin had requested a single that was "radio friendly", but upon hearing the songs they rejected them, stating that they felt they were better suited for an album. This caused Blegvad and Moore to rethink their songwriting strategy, and they began producing more serious and challenging music. Moore said they had written material "which had to be executed using a musical vocabulary greater than Peter or I could handle." This led to Slapp Happy asking Henry Cow to be their backing band on their second album for Virgin. After discussions between the two bands, they collaborated in November 1974 and recorded Desperate Straights. "Europa" and "War" were re-recorded, and the album was later released under the name "Slapp Happy/Henry Cow".

The success of this collaboration surprised everyone, considering how dissimilar the two bands were. The music often had a Berlin Cabaret feel about it with a taste of avant-garde jazz. Slapp Happy and Henry Cow decided to merge and returned to the studio in early 1975 to record Henry Cow's In Praise of Learning. The only real contribution from Slapp Happy (besides Dagmar's singing) was the Moore/Blegvad song "War", which blended in well with the album's political aggression. But differences in approach between the two groups had come to a head in April 1975 and Moore and Blegvad quit, suggesting that Henry Cow's music was too serious (and political) for their liking. Krause, however, elected to remain with Henry Cow, who needed a vocalist. This effectively meant the end of Slapp Happy as a band. They did, however, record one more single, "Johnny's Dead", without Krause, which was released in July 1975. It was credited to "Slapp Happy featuring Anthony Moore", and was the beginning of Moore's solo career, in which he spelt his name "More".

Reunions
Moore and Blegvad then both embarked on separate solo careers. In 1982 the trio reunited briefly to record a Slapp Happy single, "Everybody's Slimmin' (Even Men and Women)" on their own private label, Half-Cat Records. Here Krause sings rap-style to a rhythm box sound. They also performed live (for the first time ever) during the "Dial M For Music" festival, held at London's Institute of Contemporary Arts on 10 September 1982.

The three collaborated again in 1991 on a specially commissioned television opera "Camera", produced by After Image for Channel 4, based on an original idea by Krause, with words by Blegvad and music by Moore. Krause played the lead character "Melusina" and the opera was broadcast two years later on Channel 4 in the United Kingdom. The soundtrack Camera was released on CD in 2000, although under the names "Dagmar Krause, Anthony Moore and Peter Blegvad" and not "Slapp Happy".

In 1997, Slapp Happy reunited again to record a new studio album Ça Va on Richard Branson's new V2 label. It was Slapp Happy's first album since 1975 and the music picked up from where it had left off with literate and quirky pop songs. A departure from the past, however, was that they made the music themselves, playing all the instruments and using looped samples to produce a layered sound on many of the tracks.

Slapp Happy was popular in Japan and toured there in 2000, playing on stage without any backing musicians. A CD, Live in Japan, was released in 2001 in Japan only.

Krause, Moore and Blegvad reformed Slapp Happy again in November 2016 to perform with Faust at the Week-End festival in Cologne, Germany. The two groups also played together on 10–11 February 2017 at Cafe Oto in London. On 24 February 2017 Slapp Happy, without Faust, performed at Mt. Rainier Hall, Shibuya in Tokyo. In September 2017, Slapp Happy and Faust played at the 10th Rock in Opposition festival in Carmaux, France. They made a final appearance in November 2017 in Brussels, Belgium.

Music
Slapp Happy's music was eccentric pop with an "avant-garde" twist to it. It drew on a variety of musical idioms, including waltzes, bossa novas, French chansons and tangos. The songs' lyrics were literate and playful while the mood varied from "dreamy" to sinister. However, it was Dagmar Krause's unusual and eerie high-pitched voice that was the group's most arresting feature. Her German-inflected vocals ranged from a sweet melodious croon to the "love-it-or-hate-it" Armageddon style typified on In Praise of Learning.

Members
Note: Dagmar Krause was credited as "Daggi" on Slapp Happy's first album, Sort Of (1972). On the next three albums, Slapp Happy (1974), Desperate Straights (1975) and In Praise of Learning (1975), she was credited as "Dagmar". From Acnalbasac Noom (1980) onwards Krause was credited with her full name.
 * Anthony Moore – keyboards, guitar, percussion, programming, tape manipulation, toy theremin, melodica, harmonica, vocals
 * Peter Blegvad – guitar, bass guitar, saxophone, clarinet, percussion, harmonica, vocals
 * Dagmar Krause – vocals, piano, percussion, harmonica

Discography
The year below indicates the release date (not the recording date).

Albums

 * Sort Of (1972, LP, Polydor Records, Germany)
 * Slapp Happy (also known as Casablanca Moon) (1974, LP, Virgin Records, UK)
 * Desperate Straights (with Henry Cow) (1975, LP, Virgin Records, UK)
 * In Praise of Learning (with Henry Cow) (1975, LP, Virgin Records, UK)
 * Acnalbasac Noom (1980, LP, Recommended Records, UK)
 * Ça Va (1998, CD, V2 Records, UK)
 * Camera (as "Dagmar Krause/Anthony Moore/Peter Blegvad") (2000, CD, Blueprint Records, UK)
 * Live in Japan (2001, CD, FMN Records, Japan)

Singles

 * "Just a Conversation" / "Jumpin' Jonah" (1972, 7", Polydor Records, Germany)
 * "Casablanca Moon" / "Slow Moon's Rose" (1974, 7", Virgin Records, UK)
 * "Johnny's Dead" / "Mr. Rainbow" (1975, 7", Virgin Records, UK) – credited to "Slapp Happy featuring Anthony Moore"
 * "Alcohol" (1981, 7", Recommended Records, UK) – one-sided bonus single issued with RēR re-issue of Sort Of
 * "Everybody's Slimmin' (Even Men and Women)" / "Blue-Eyed William" (1983, 7", Half-Cat Records, UK)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Slapp Happy


text:
Freedom Day (South Africa)

Freedom Day is a public holiday in South Africa celebrated on 27 April. It commemorates the first post-apartheid elections held on that day in 1994 and the day on which the new constitution was introduced. The elections were the first national elections where everyone of voting age of over 18 from any race group, was allowed to vote.

It is part of the twelve public holidays determined by the Public Holidays Act (No. 36 of 1994).

On the first commemoration of the holiday, President Nelson Mandela addressed Parliament:

"As a new dawn ushered in this day, the 27th of April 1994, few of us could suppress the welling of emotion, as we were reminded of the terrible past from which we come as a nation; the great possibilities that we now have; and the bright future that beckons us. And so we assemble here today, and in other parts of the country, to mark a historic day in the life of our nation. Wherever South Africans are across the globe, our hearts beat as one, as we renew our common loyalty to our country and our commitment to its future."

Freedom Day is an annual celebration held on April 27 in South Africa. The day reminds South Africans of the immeasurable sacrifices made by individuals and nations to break them away from the chains of unjust segregation by a selected few. It reminds them of the efforts of their national heroes, particularly Nelson Mandela. He is regarded as a champion of freedom, not only in South Africa but the entire world. It is a day that not only marks the emancipation of South Africans from apartheid but also returned their essential human rights in 1994.

title: Freedom Day (South Africa)


text: Category:Electronics stubs

title: Category:Electronics stubs


text: User talk:129.242.154.143

title: User talk:129.242.154.143


text:
The Mill

The Mill may refer to:

 * The Mill (company), a post-production and visual effects company
 * The Mill (Burne-Jones painting), a painting by British artist Edward Burne-Jones
 * The Mill (Rembrandt), a painting by Dutch baroque artist Rembrandt
 * The Mill (Rembrandt print), 1641
 * The Mill, the fictional workplace in Doctors
 * The Mill (TV series), a 2013 British period television drama#
 * The Mill (1921 film), Swedish film
 * The Mill (2023 film), American film
 * The Mill (building), an apartment complex in Ipswich, England
 * The Mill (newspaper), a local online newspaper operating in Greater Manchester

title: The Mill


text: User talk:217.102.155.224

title: User talk:217.102.155.224


text:
Karoonda, South Australia

Karoonda is a town in the middle of the Murray Mallee region of South Australia (60 km northeast of Murray Bridge). The current boundaries include the former town of Lowaldie, which was the next stop on the railway line away from Adelaide.

History
Karoonda takes its name from the Aboriginal word for "winter camp".

The town was founded on wheat-growing early in the 20th century (proclaimed on 11 December 1913), but the cleared land is also suitable for raising merino sheep. The Karoonda Development Group instigated and built a larger-than-life sculpture of a Merino ram in the park in the main street to emphasise this. There are even seats with rams heads dotted around the town. A number of other agricultural and horticultural industries are now also represented in the district. Each year the Karoonda Farm Fair is held, a two-day event attracting over 10,000 visitors to the town.

In 1922 the District Council of Karoonda was established, bringing local-level government to the township and surrounding district for the first time.

Karoonda briefly shot to international fame in 1930 when the "Karoonda meteorite" fell to earth just to the east of the town on the night of 25 November. Being of a very rare type and being found only a couple of weeks afterwards, it raised international interest in astronomical circles.

Railways
Railways were built in 1911–1914 to open up the mallee. Karoonda was on the Brown's Well railway line (extended to Barmera in 1928) and became a junction with the Waikerie railway line to the north and the Peebinga railway line to the east (south of the main line).

The Barmera railway line closed in 1990 but the Waikerie branch line remained open until 1994. The main line through Karoonda remained open as the Loxton railway line and was converted from broad gauge to standard gauge. It closed in July 2015.

Governance and demographics
Karoonda is located in the local government area of District Council of Karoonda East Murray, the state electoral district of Hammond and the federal Division of Barker.

At the 2016 census, the locality of Karoonda had a population of 512, of which 351 were living in and around the town of Karoonda. In Karoonda locality 90.6% of people were born in Australia and 93.3% of people spoke only English at home. The most common responses for religion were Uniting Church 25.0% and No Religion 22.4%.

Facilities and attractions
Karoonda Area School was the first area school in South Australia. There is some amazeing silo art done by Heesco over the winter months of 2019 also the playground is a good car stop for kids of all ages Pioneer Park on East Terrace is being developed as a Malleelands Pioneer Railways and farm museum, with displays of harvest machinery, ploughs, railway rolling stock and facilities already in place. The Nature Trail & Bush Walk is adjacent.

There is an obelisk to commemorate the Karoonda meteorite in the RSL Park on Railway Terrace.

Climate
Karoonda experiences a cold semi-arid climate (Köppen climate classification: BSk), Trewartha: BSal); with warm, dry summers; mild, relatively dry springs and autumns; and mild, relatively dry winters.

Lowaldie
The Lowaldie railway station was 6.25 mi east of Karoonda and also had a small town surveyed, with a school and post office operating for some time. These have all closed, and the former institute building is used as a private residence. The station was originally named Lowalde in 1913, but when the town was proclaimed in 1914, the spelling used was Lowaldie. The name is derived from a Ngarrindjeri word meaning "summer".

title: Karoonda, South Australia


text:
Ore railway station

Ore railway station serves Ore in East Sussex, England. It is on the Marshlink Line, and train services are provided by Southern, with a single peak hour service operated by Southeastern.

Third rail 750 V DC electrification from Hastings ends here.

History
The station opened in 1888 and was electrified in 1935.

Ore station was once adjoined to the north by a depot for electric trains but this closed in May 1986 following the electrification of the Hastings to Tonbridge line and relocation of electric units for servicing and cleaning to St Leonards depot.

Facilities
Today, there are two platforms linked by a footbridge. Both platforms have shelters and modern help points. Ore station has been unstaffed since a booking office fire in the late 1980s, although the station has a self-service ticket machine available for ticket purchases. The station has step-free access to the Ashford bound platform only.

The area has in the past been a hotspot for vandalism but is now covered comprehensively by CCTV. It is scheduled for re-development in the future which may involve the station being renamed to either Hastings East or Ore Valley.

Services
Ore station is the terminus for electric East Coastway services. Trains terminating and restarting at this station run forward into a turnaround siding which runs adjacent to the Marshlink Line as far as Ore Tunnel. Ore is also the start of the single track section on the Marshlink Line.

Off-peak, all services at Ore are operated by Southern using DMUs and  EMUs.

The typical off-peak service in trains per hour is:
 * 1 tph to London Victoria via Gatwick Airport
 * 1 tph to Brighton (semi-fast)
 * 1 tph to Eastbourne (stopping)
 * 1 tph to Ashford International

The station is also served by a single early morning service to London Cannon Street via Tunbridge Wells, operated by Southeastern.

title: Ore railway station


text:
Talk:Hard news, soft news, and infotainment

Beland, "timeliness" is a problematic criteria, and I think you understand this. Wondering what you might plan to do to codify the overlap there. -SV|t|add
 * What do you mean "problematic", exactly? Overlap between which? -- Beland 13:41, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)


text: User talk:210.3.5.24

title: User talk:210.3.5.24


text:
User:DWR

Interests
Politics, Economics, Accountancy and Taxation.

One of my key interests is in globalising articles on Taxation which only deal with the issues in a particular jurisdiction, usually the United States.

Contributions

 * Deferred tax
 * Withholding tax
 * Partnership taxation
 * Capital gains
 * Participation exemption
 * Substantial shareholdings exemption
 * Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988
 * Golden Rule (fiscal policy)
 * Giovanni Sartori

title: User:DWR


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nehruvian-Stalinism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE, which has already been valiantly implemented by User:Neutrality as he struggled for air amidst a sea of sock puppets. Postdlf 02:19, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Nehruvian-Stalinism
Original research, this term has only marginal use. Google shows 27 hits, subtract Wikipedia and mirrors, and some commentator on rediff.com who likes to put this term into his articles, and you see the insignifance. --Pjacobi 09:36, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)

Speedy Keep this article. PJacobi has been making allegations against others including me and claims that I joined Wiki to make this vote. I've been using this id for at least 2 years now, maybe three, I can't remember. I have made other contributions to Wikipedia and if you search hard enough, you may find them. Why is Wikipedia allowing vandalism of this sort? I have given academic references below while voting. Victoria Primus 14:44, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

**Firstly, the article contains several factual inaccuracies, for example, in India, collectivization of the farm sector was never introduced as the term is understood in the context of former USSR. Please also note the concluding sentence of this article: “In Soviet Union, Stalin made himself all powerful and honored himself by naming Stalingrad after himself during his lifetime. In India, Jawaharlal Nehru came under criticism for the proposal to name Jawaharlal Nehru University after himself during his lifetime.” It is interesting to note that Jawahar Lal Nehru has died on 27th May, 1964(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jawaharlal_Nehru) where as Jawahar Lal University (JNU) was opened in early 70s (http://www.jnu.ac.in/main.asp?sendval=Introduction) **Secondly, comparison between Jawaharlal Nehru and Joseph Stalin is highly absurd – Nehru led a democratically elected government of India, whereas Joseph Stalin led a centrally controlled economy. **Thirdly, the term Nehruvian-Stalinism has been used only in two articles in the wikipedia, one in this article, and then in another article Jawahar Lal Nehru. The context in which the term Nehruvian-Stalinism has been used in the article Jawaharlal Nehru smacks of extreme misinformation and biased understanding of the reality of time, when Nehru lived and managed the affairs of India. I presume good faith on behalf of the creator of the article Nehruvian-Stalinism, but the possibility of using the wikipedia to float the term cannot be ruled out, though I am not sure of this, except that a pattern in the use of the term Nehruvian-Stalinism is visible in both the articles. **Fourthly, wikipedia is neither an experiment in anarchy nor it is an experiment in democracy; it is not a place to write about and float new ideas, it is an encyclopedia and not a place for pseudo-academicians to circulate their dogmas. **Fifthly, as a relatively new wikipedian, I may be inexperienced, but I simply marvel at the conceited views of some anonymous editors who write article like this, as well as pick up unnecessary arguments - specimen of which one can find on the Talk page of article Jawahar Lal Nehru (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jawaharlal_Nehru) - the article, where the term Nehruvian-Stalinism finds mention twice.
 * Delete, seems to be a phrase invented by (and mostly used) an Indian commentator and blogger Rajeev Srinivasan last year (look at the dates and authorship on those articles). Not notable. Megan1967 12:32, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. --Idont Havaname 14:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, see What_Wikipedia_is_not, topic 1.3.1 (Propaganda or advocacy of any kind) and 1.3.5 (No original research); See also HERE AN(Ger) 15:22, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete propaganda. — Sesel wa  22:55, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:48, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per Megan1967's explanation. El_C 07:45, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Delete, because of several reasons.--Bhadani 09:27, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

All above comments are were without hurting anyone’s feeling and anyone's academic credentials - my comments have been made with an intention to make wikipedia a reliable online encyclopedia. My personal thanks to all above wikipedians, to all other fellow wikipedians, particularly User:Pjacobi and User:Megan1967 for their initiative in this matter to maintain the quality of wikipedia.--Bhadani 16:56, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) (comments crossed by me in view of certain wiki-users's feeling that I had some vendetta, etc. etc. My vote for Delete stands --Bhadani 09:27, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC))
 * I have seen some more comments which have appeared after my comments above. It looks fine that the term has created a lot of attention among wikipedia users and I feel very nice that some of them have just registered and come to this page to register their VOTE for KEEP. It reminds me of capturing the polling booth, which happens sometimes, when same person may be voting again and again - this is a general comment of the reality of situation, and not personal comments. I welcome all new comers who registered and did their first ever edit on wikipedia for this issue. Cheers! I also feel the correct and neutral term would be, may be "Nehruvian socialism" or something like that - but, I am stepping aside so that some one with better credentials may write a better article. I am also sure that all those who have come here in support of the term Nehruvian-Stalinism to contribute some inputs to improve the article, if they have time and the inclination. --Bhadani 07:18, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete accuarcy issues aside, it doesn't appear to be a widely accepted term. Andypasto 08:48, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, User:Andypasto, you said in so few words, so many things.--Bhadani 11:05, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * keep - I am shocked at the callous manner in which people bring their politics to the table. This article is accurate and as an Indologist, I can testify that India is an unfortunate country. It is true that India has imposed a Stalinist economy complete with a Planning Commission and the term "commanding heights" is very accurate. My jaw dropped at people doing a web search to determine whether a term is legitimate. Nehruvian-Stalinism is a common term in economics. In fact, many indian economists of the 1960s and 1970s were proud to identify themselves as such! Are we now doubting the reports of Transparency International that considers India to be a corrupt country? What about all the poverty? You do injustice to millions of people who have suffered under the system by deleting an article that is very accurate and to the point. Deletion of this article would be similar to giving in to a lynch-mob that supports Communism. Victoria Primus

I should also add that the Congress Party (party of Jawaharlal Nehru) has now formed a government in India with the Communists! This word is very much in use by the people in the know! The communists are in control in India are fast moving towards stalinism by finding and obliterating anything that shows them poor light......Wikipedia being a distinguished source of information, should be secular in nature and not give into any political lobbying. [User: Mysore Madhwa
 * Victoria here again - Another point is that collectivization *was* introduced in India in the 1950s. It failed and after the war against China, the people of India trashed it as a Chinese method and gave it up.
 * No way! Do not DELETE********
 * Note: 24.214.192.116's first edit. Jayjg (talk) 06:59, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * Do not delete. I did a Google search too and it seems to have sufficient use to justify its inclusion in wikipedia. As a frequent visitor to India, I have been struck by the personality cult of Nehru there too, very Soviet style. Just as Stalin and Mao did, Nehru too seems to have built himself up, with the same type of poor economic policies. Please, no propaganda and the pushing of personal agendas. And no canvassing of votes either, my fellow editors. This is against the spirit of Wikipedia. Let us be humble enough to admit that none of us is the world's leading expert on anything. Dear editor Bhadani, no personal crusades or vendettas, please. Charles Kingsley
 * This was Charles' first edit on Wikipedia. Nice to see you joining our efferts, Charles. --Pjacobi 06:44, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)

 * Thank you, thank you, Pjacobi. It's my pleasure to continue to contribute by humble mite to your efforts, as I have been doing anonymously for some time. Charles Kingsley on a proxy. 164.164.81.4 02:27, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep - The argument that the existence of a factual inaccuracy should be grounds to delete the article goes against the spirit of Wikipedia. You just have to edit the article and remove the factual inaccuracy. Haing said that, I have noticed that a lot of internet users belong to the young crowd and do not know much of the cold war era. The article is factually correct and even the point about Jawaharlal Nehru University is correct. The proposal came about in early 60s and it was passed in parliament soon after Nehru's death and then the foundation stone was laid and it took a few years to build it. No university is built overnight.

Also check http://www.hindu.com/2005/01/17/stories/2005011700350900.htm I quote - '''India's national aim, the outgoing Congress President, Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, said in Madras on January 17 "is a welfare state and a socialist economy." In a 6000-word report to the AICC, on relinquishing office as Congress President, Mr. Nehru said the establishment of a socialistic pattern of society had been implicit all along in the Congress objective and "it is right that we should make this perfectly clear now and keep this picture in view at all stages of our planning.'''

Economically, Indian economy is still Stalinist in nature. Why are we trying to cover this up? Wikipedia should not be covering up stuff, but should propagate insights from experts wherever possible. You should welcome the expert view instead of insisting on the populist view every time. LibertarianAnarchist

 * DO NOT DELETE - The article is reasonably accurate, and the term is widely used among right wing political circles in India.

 * Who posted the last vote above? Can you please sign your name? I just read the deletion policy page and I see that you are supposed to vote as "keep" and not as "do not delete." I changed my vote to "keep" from "do not delete". Can others do the same just in case a script counts the votes. I guess I started the trend and others just followed suit. From the deletion policy page, I also see that you can sign with four ~ (tildes) places next to each other. Victoria Primus 05:14, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: Victoria joined Wikipedia to vote here. --Pjacobi 06:44, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)

I don't know what all this fuss is about. The original article is highly informative, accurate and factual. Anyone who has lived in India or experienced it first-hand would attest to this. Besides being chummy with Josef Stalin, Nehru did copy a lot of things from the Soviet model: central planning, 5-year plans, large dams, etc. Even waiting periods for telephone connections and ration shops are direct 'inspirations' from USSR. I am afraid somebody with a political axe to grind is out to delete this article, their action is in the true spirit of Communism: that is, muffle all dissenting voices. Eersj 05:31, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell071201.asp Though the Indian statist leaders thought of themselves as looking out for the poor, their policies have been estimated to have held back economic development to the point where the average Indian's income would have been hundreds of dollars a year greater without their restrictions. In a country with millions of very poor people, some suffering from malnutrition, the loss of a few hundred dollars in annual income meant far more than it would have meant to the average American.
 * Keep
 * First and only edit of this user. --Pjacobi 06:44, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
 * Dear Eersj welcome to wikipedia - I am sure that the wikipedia community will benefit from your other edits also, particulary on Indian economy of Nehru's time - it appears that you have very good personal experience of those time. By the way, please improve the present article to conform to wiki-standard, it is my personal appeal to you. By the way, it may be other way round - somebody with a political axe to grind is out to keep this article -you are sure of your opinion, but I am not: because I beleive that several persons have registered in a day or two to vote to keep this article for academic reasons, and not for political reasons. --Bhadani 07:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Adding comments
 * From a Thomas Sowell article

Like so many socialistic policies around the world, those in India were not relaxed or ended because of better understanding but because of bitter experience. When these policies had the Indian government on the verge of bankruptcy, its leaders had no choice but to make fundamental changes in the economy, in order to qualify for help from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

http://www.forbes.com/business/global/2004/0621/016.html Under the socialist regime of Jawaharlal Nehru and his family successors the state was intolerant, restrictive and grotesquely bureaucratic. That has largely changed (though much bureaucracy remains), and the natural tolerance of the Hindu mind-set has replaced quasi-Marxist rigidity. Victoria Primus 05:44, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * From an article by the highly respected historian, Paul Johnson:

Contrary to what the original poster claims, this article and the term "Nehruvian-Stalinism" is an excellent summary of an important period in world history. There is absolutely no insignifance (sic) about this article. I appeal to Wikipedia not to cravenly cave in to these bullies. Drjayaraman 05:53, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * keep
 * First and only edit of this user. --Pjacobi 06:44, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)

I am Indian citizen and have seen first hand how Nehruvian views are closely related with Stalinism. Factual errors in the article is not a sufficient reason to delete the article. This term makes perfect sense to someone who has witnessed the Nehruvian era.
 * Keep

Insightful term Harihara 06:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I just came back to this page to see how the voting was going. Victoria, thank you for letting us know the key word is 'keep'. So here's my vote to keep this entry. I had previously posted 'Do not delete'. I agree with posters above that the term and the concept are meaningful. Charles Kingsley 06:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: Second vote by user. Jayjg (talk) 07:01, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: As fully acknowledged by user. Charles Kingsley 164.164.81.4 02:27, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * keep
 * Note: User's first edit on Wikipedia. Jayjg (talk) 06:57, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * welcome Harihara - Your first edit to wikipedia perhaps? All the best, I am sure it will not be your last one.--Bhadani 07:02, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is just a political smear and the article is pure POV. Firebug 06:54, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gamaliel 07:04, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - The term represents an important era of Indian history. DemoCrat2005 09:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: User's first edit on Wikipedia. Strange this. Proto 11:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Proto 11:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do NOT delete - Do not give in to politicians. There is no word other than Nehruvian-Stalinism to explain the same line of policies followed by Stalin and Nehru.
 * Unsigned vote by User:Georgethundi. He has made only 3 edits, all to this VFD. Can we get a sock check on all these new accounts? Either there are sockpuppets in play, or someone has been recruiting new voters from outside Wikipedia. Either way, this should not be allowed to determine the outcome of the consensus. Firebug 11:53, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep - Before it is held against me as a way to dilute my vote -- yes this is my first edit. But that does not mean I do not understand What_Wikipedia_is_not. Similarities between Nehruism and Stalinism have always been a hot topic of discussion in Indian economics arena and this term has been standardised to refer to this system. This term is gaining usage on internet and Wikipedia is a perfect reference to explain what the meaning and connotation of Nehruvian-Stalinism is for the uninitiated. Aalu.paneer
 * We generally try to assume good faith, but this task is sometimes made difficult by numerous cases in which individuals have created numerous accounts under different names to vote multiple times. Your first edit on this site was to a deletion discussion, which is often considered suspicious due to the amount of abuse that has been committed on past discussions of this nature. By the way, deletion is not a straight vote; it is an attempt to reach consensus. I'm curious as to how you came across Wikipedia, and in particular, how you came across this deletion discussion. Were you asked to join this particular discussion by another participant? Firebug 12:45, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * All I can say is that is not my first edit on Wikipedia (although first under an ID). I understand the attempt at reaching concesus via discussion and that is why so many have joined it. The idea of cooling off for a while and then coming back sounds good. Though it seems the page has already been deleted. Sadly, Wikipedia seems to be turning into yabb where a archive loses out to editor's politics! On your question how I landed here, Google is your friend. My vote to Keep remains because this term was not "invented" on Wikipedia, has large usage in specific circles and needs a good reference for people needing introduction to it. Aalu.paneer

 * Hello dear aalu.paneer, I would love to welcome you – at least with your User ID, I am feeling jealous – beacause, as a vegetarian, I like the curry of aalu.paneer (http://indiabistro.com/menu.htm) – lol. At least, this article has assisted in registration of several new users to save the article, and welcome aboard the wikipedia. May be this article can be saved, if someone really try to save it by giving fresh inputs, along with voting for keep. I would request users to avoid using funny User IDs and dilute the santity of wikipedia. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:52, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Bhadani, not all users of Wikipedia are registered users or login and then contribute. I am glad to know that my alias, aalu paneer continues to make people smile. I do not know why you think it is a "funny" User ID, disrepectful to Wikipedia and did not know one needed a inane or "suits" types name to be considered seriously on Wikipedia! -- Aalu.paneer

Keep - This term refers to a number of blunders committed by Nehru, which caused a lot of famines, unemployment, wide-scale poverty, desertification of a lot of rural villages with no water for drinking and state monopoly in a number of industries. These blunders are the reasons why there is a huge migration of people from rural villages and towns towards cities, where the state created all the new jobs. In a way, this causes the creation of slums in most of the major cities, also leading to a lot of crime and anti-social behaviour. Indian media is controlled by a lot of communists and monority communities with their own vested interests in not letting the masses know about the ill effects of the state planning and the licence-permit-quota-raj and the creation of personality based politics. This is the reason why the Nehruvian-Stalinism term is not so widely referenced in a number of web sites and publications. By deleting this article, wikipedia will inadvertently side with these Vested Interests and endanger the suppression of the causes of millions of indians are still poor, from being popularised with the Indian masses. Only when the people know what they are suffering from, can they think and find a solution on how to eradicate those diseases that affect them and return to good health, literally, economically and philosophically. -- ksriram
 * User's second edit on Wikipedia (first was also on this VfD page) Proto 13:35, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * This term refers to a number of blunders committed by Nehru, which caused a lot of famines, unemployment, wide-scale poverty, desertification of a lot of rural villages with no water for drinking and state monopoly in a number of industries. These blunders are the reasons why there is a huge migration of people from rural villages and towns towards cities, where the state created all the new jobs. That's nice. But it is pure POV and has no place on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. The term Nehruvian-Stalinism gets only 35 hits on Google. Frankly, it is possible for one or a few individuals to drum up that number of hits. It's absurd to claim that the Indian government is responsible for this poor showing; India is not a totalitarian state. You seem to think that this article should serve as a POV platform; that is precisely why I think it should be deleted. Firebug 12:50, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * This is now getting silly, I count 10 votes to keep, at least 7 of which are first ever edits by 'new users', and 2 anonymous ... can someone check IP addresses? Proto 13:35, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep this article. However, there is a need for balance and a more nuanced analysis to get beyond the usual Left-Right politics (which, imo is not enough to understand India). It is important that this article include concepts such as modernization & industrialization since these are unquestionably the most powerful & irresitable drivers of global societal change in the past 500 years; these concepts is crucial to understanding independent india since is is undeniable that indian modernization started in earnest post colonialism.  Next, this article needs to explore how various societies/ civilizations around the world navigated through and coped with modernization/ industrialization. For example, Western Europe's modernization is associated with colonialism/ imperialism, massive migration to and subsequent genocide in the new world, slavery, apartheid, world wars, capitalist control economies. By contrast, Eastern Europe & China did not have the luxury or ability for large scale outbound emigrations, colonialism, imperialism etc.  Therefore, in contrast to Western Europe, Eastern Europe and china turned inwards, adopted communism and ended up genociding their own people (those deemed unfit for modernization by some criteria). India's path to modernization was different (one that wanted every Indian to get on the modernization train, even if it meant that any indian could set up a paan shop in a hole in the wall or become a rickshaw puller) & Nehru should be seen as someone who represents a change agent for the modernization of india. If these changes cannot be made, then my suggestion would be to delete the article.
 * This is an unsigned vote by User:208.204.155.241. It is his 13th contribution. Firebug 17:26, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, if only to stem the sockpuppet flood. - Mustafaa 21:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * Note a vote, but a humble observation. I have already voted above. I have been posting anonymously on Wikipedia for a long time, and from multiple IP addresses (as I travel a lot). This is the first time I have seen such a remarkable tussle about deleting an article. To the extent that I felt some pressure to create an id just so that I would be taken seriously here (although my personal preference would be to remain anonymous). If I were to summarize what I see here, it seems as though editor Bhadani has a clear personal axe to grind, for reasons that are not clear to me. A number of  other responsible editors seem to have got caught up in what looks like an orchestrated campaign by Bhadani, clues to which show up in his fulsome thanks and praise of various editors who support his perspective. In response to this, it looks like a number of editors with the opposite perspective have jumped in, perhaps as first-time voters. Both sides are in the wrong. In other words, this looks like one of those sad tales of voting fraud you hear about in oh... India, the US (remember 'hanging chads'?), etc. I think the whole voting process has been compromised here. I would suggest a cooling-off period and a deferral of this vote. Why on earth is this such an earth-shakingly important issue? Socialism, Stalinism, Leninism, Maoism, all of them have been shown to be frauds. All good for marketing purposes, but not for reality. Charles Kingsley on a proxy. 164.164.81.4 02:27, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * By the way, I was seventh to vote for delete - before me all have voted for delete. After, me most of the users have  voted for Keep, only few have voted for delete: the normal conclusion should be, may be, my delete created more votes for keeps. I also do agree that a cooling period should be there so that the issue can be resolved in keeping with the highest wiki traditions. I can assure every one that I donot have any axe to grind. My edits numbering around 900 plus within five weeks may be seen to verify my inclinations.  As regards travelling job -for years, I have been travelling also. Do travelling folks donot keep email IDs? What is wrong if one keeps a Wiki ID as well?  To be nice to fellow wikipedians - is a wiki tradition, I have praised someone when there was not even a single keep vote, so that remark is out of context, perhaps. I have also welcomed all other new comers, who at least took the trouble to register to vote here. Bye and thanks. And, I am stepping aside from this issue, instead let me concentrate on other projects on wikipedia. --Bhadani 03:17, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * Dear editor Bhadani, may I ask you to respect my right to post anonymously? Besides, I am glad we agree on something: a cooling-off period. Charles Kingsley 03:42, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * As this may be overlooked in the vast amount of text written: The article is on VfD not because of factual inaccuracies (which in itself is not even a valid deletion argument), but because of being a neologism of insignifact usage. A encyclopedia describes terms which are in use, it doesn't try to invent new words or help inventors of neologisms to promote their case. --Pjacobi 12:54, 2005 Apr 30 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Three Oaks railway station

Three Oaks railway station serves the village of Three Oaks, East Sussex, England. It is on the Marshlink line with all services operated by Southern. It was originally known as Three Oaks & Guestling.

History
The railway line between Ashford and Hastings was opened by the South Eastern Railway in 1851, but originally there were no stations between Winchelsea and Hastings. Ore opened in 1888, and with the introduction of steam railmotor services between Rye and Hastings, three halts were opened between Winchelsea and Ore on 1 July 1907: Snailham Crossing Halt; Guestling Halt; and Three Oaks Bridge Halt. The latter station has been renamed four times: in 1909 it became Three Oaks Halt; later on it became Three Oaks & Guestling Halt; on 5 May 1969 Three Oaks & Guestling; finally on 12 May 1980 the present name of Three Oaks was adopted.

Description
The station has a single platform from which trains depart to Ashford International and Eastbourne via Hastings. The Marshlink line was singled on 1 October 1979 between Appledore and Ore, with the westbound platform now used by services in both directions with the eastbound platform remaining in situ, albeit in a decaying state.

The platform can only accommodate a single carriage, meaning that passengers wishing to disembark must travel in the front carriage of the train.

There is a ticket issuing facility accepting card payments available here and a customer help point with on-screen customer information.

Services
The typical off-peak service at Three Oaks is one train per hour each way between Eastbourne (via Hastings) and Ashford International. All services are operated by Southern using DMUs.

Service history
Until 2005 the station was served by hourly services each way between Ashford International and Hastings. However, in the 2005 timetable change, trains on the line were extended to run to/from Brighton (via Eastbourne and Lewes) and operated as express services; as a result, service frequency at Three Oaks (as well as neighbouring Doleham and Winchelsea) was greatly reduced, to just 3 trains per day each way. This led to the creation of a campaign the by Three Oaks and Winchelsea Action for Rail Transport (THWART) and the Marshlink Line Action Group (MLAG), which aimed to restore regular services from these stations.

This campaign was successful, and from December 2010 the weekday and Saturday service frequency at Three Oaks and Winchelsea was increased to 1 train every 2 hours each way (with services calling alternately at each station), plus a few additional stopping services during the peaks. The Sunday frequency has also been two-hourly each way since December 2015. In May 2018, the Brighton express services were replaced by stopping services to/from Eastbourne.

The May 2023 timetable change saw hourly services fully restored, with all trains now calling at both Three Oaks and Winchelsea seven days a week.

title: Three Oaks railway station


text:
Council Learned in the Law

The Council Learned in the Law was a highly controversial tribunal of Henry VII of England's reign.

The brainchild of Sir Reginald Bray, the Council Learned was introduced in 1495 to defend Henry's position as a feudal landlord, maintain the King's revenue and exploit his prerogative rights. It dealt with the king's fiscal matters and enforced payments of debts. It proved to be much more efficient than the Exchequer. The council was a secondary department to the Star Chamber, but it was the Council Learned in Law that made the system of bonds and recognisances work so effectively. Following Bray's death in 1503, he was replaced with Edmund Dudley. Dudley, along with Empson, formed a feared combination of able bureaucrats who raised the extraction of money from the King's associates into a fine art and created many enemies amongst key advisors of the King.

By the end of Henry VII's reign, the Council Learned had become very unpopular, and after his death in 1509, it was abolished. Its most prominent councilors, Edmund Dudley and Sir Richard Empson, were imprisoned. Though evidence was scarce, both were convicted of treason, attainted and executed in 1510. The downfall of the pair brought rejoicing in the streets.

There is much controversy about the Council Learned in the Law because most existing sources date after 1509 when it had been officially condemned. Bray's associate, Empson, maintained a particularly ruthless approach that seemed to define the behavior of the Council. In the Tower, Dudley confessed to having issued harsher penalties than lawful in several cases, a statement which has given the Council a strongly negative connotation.

It bypassed the normal legal system since it was not a court and those summoned had no chance of appeal. It was an expression of the King's will and as such was as important for maintaining authority as it was for raising finances.

title: Council Learned in the Law


text:
Riemke (Bochum)

Riemke is a major district of the city of Bochum, Ruhr area, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Riemke borders to the city of Herne. The other districts of Bochum, Riemke borders to are Bergen-Hiltrop, Grumme and Hofstede.

Riemke was mentioned for the first time as "Rymbecke" in the 9th century. On 1 April 1926 the municipality of Riemke was integrated into the city of Bochum. Riemke is a district that is more working class.

Riemke was known for the large Nokia works. The factory closed in May 2008.

A market square is in the center of Riemke. The St. Franziskus church is one of the landmarks of the district.

Riemke has the highest point of in the north of Bochum, the Tippelsberg. In the east of Riemke is the Naturschutzgebiet Zillertal.

Riemke is connected by the A43 Autobahn. Additionally Riemke is connected by rail at the line Bochum-Gelsenkirchen (Glückauf-Bahn).

title: Riemke (Bochum)


text:
Train order operation

Train order operation is a system for safely moving trains using train orders, as opposed to fixed signals or cab signalling. In train order operation, a "train order" is an order issued by or through a proper railway official to govern the movement of trains".

Train order operation was widely used by the railroads of North America before the days of centralized traffic control (CTC), direct traffic control (DTC), and the use of track warrants conveyed by radio. The system used a set of rules when direct communication between train dispatchers and trains was limited or non-existent. Trains would follow a predetermined operating plan, known as the timetable, unless superseded by train orders conveyed to the train from the dispatcher, through local intermediaries. Train order operation was a system that required minimum human overhead in an era before widespread use of technology-based automation. It was the most practical way for railroads with limited capital resources, or lines with limited traffic, to operate. To this day, many short lines, heritage railways, and railroad museums continue to use Train Order operation.

North American usage

Timetable and train order operation was widely used on North American railroads that had a single main track with periodic passing sidings. Timetable and train orders were used to determine which train had the right of way at any point along the line. A train which had the right of way over another train was said to be the superior train. Trains could be superior by right, by class or by direction. While a train dispatcher could establish "right" via train orders, the operating timetable established scheduled trains, their class and the superior direction. The "class" designation of a train equates to its priority, with passenger trains having the highest, freight trains having less and Extra (unscheduled) trains having the lowest. In case of trains of the same class meeting the superior direction would then apply. On single track rail lines, the timetable specifies (explicitly or implicitly) the points at which two trains would meet and pass. It would be the responsibility of the inferior train to clear the main track a safe time before the superior train is scheduled to pass. The timetable thus provides the basic framework for train movement on a particular portion of the railroad. However, variations in traffic levels from day to day, unforeseen delays, the need to perform maintenance, and other contingencies required that railroads find a way to deviate from their established schedules.

Deviations from the timetable operation would be enacted through train orders sent from the train dispatcher to block operators. These orders would override the established timetable priorities and provide trains with explicit instructions on how to run. Train orders consisted of two types, protection and authority. Protective train orders would be used to ensure that no trains would be at risk of colliding with another along the line. Once the protective orders had been delivered to block operators (who might pass them to train crews), an authority could be issued to a train to move over the line where protection had been established. Normally the timetable established both protection and authority for scheduled trains so train orders were only used for extra trains, which were not in the timetable, and scheduled trains moving contrary to their normal authorities.

Timetable and train order operation supplanted earlier forms of timetable only and line-of-sight running. The ability for a single dispatcher to issue train orders was enabled by the invention of the electric telegraph in the 1840s. The earliest recorded usage of the telegraph to convey train orders in the US came in 1851 on the Erie Railroad and by the time of the American Civil War, nearly every railroad had adopted the system. Gradually the telegraph was supplanted by the telephone as the preferred method of communication. By the 1970s, this function was carried out primarily by two-way radio. With the advent of radio communications, timetable and train order operation began to fall out of favor as DTC and CTC became more common on major carriers. CTC enabled dispatchers to set up meets remotely and allowed trains to proceed entirely on signal indication. Where signals were not present, DTC and the related track warrant control allowed dispatchers to directly inform trains what they were to do instead of needing to work through intermediaries or have the train crews figure things out for themselves.

Train order
The train order provides the means to deal with changes in operating conditions as they arise. Orders modify the established timetable. Among the functions a train order can perform are:
 * Creating a train not provided for by the timetable (an "extra")
 * Annulling a train provided by the timetable
 * Creating sections of a schedule (in essence "cloning" a train's schedule and class when, for example, too much traffic exists to be handled by a single train)
 * Setting meeting points between extras since they have no timetable schedule
 * Altering timetable meeting points (for example when one train is late and adhering to the timetable meeting point would cause delays for other trains)
 * Altering the schedule of a train to allow other trains to run with respect to the altered schedule rather than that given in the timetable
 * Giving a train rights over another train that ordinarily has timetable superiority
 * Conveying warnings about temporary conditions such as temporary speed limits, track conditions or hazards which might affect the safety of trains or train crews

Train-order station
A train-order station is a control point at which trains can be stopped and controlled through the use of train orders. A station has a distinct name, and may have any of the following:
 * A siding or other track by which trains can pass each other
 * A communications means for an operator to receive train orders
 * A signal to indicate to trains whether there are train orders to be picked up

A train order station need not be at a passenger or freight station, nor does such a station have to handle train orders. In isolated areas, train order stations may be required where there are no towns, to facilitate smooth operation. In denser areas, passenger stations may be spaced more closely than train order stations.

A station may staffed by an operator who receives train orders and gives them to trains as they pass. Operators also record the passage of trains by their station. Upon receipt of an order, the operator makes copies and sets the signal to indicate to approaching trains that orders are to be picked up. Some train-order signals had three positions:
 * Proceed (green light or vertical blade) : No orders; train may proceed
 * Receive orders (yellow light or diagonal blade) : Pick up orders without stopping
 * Stop (red light or horizontal blade) : Stop to receive orders or to wait for another train to pass

Dispatcher and operator procedures
Train orders were issued by the dispatcher responsible for the portion of railroad concerned. They were conveyed to operators at outlying stations along the railroad via telegraph or telephone. The receiving operators would copy the order onto onionskin (multiple-copy) forms designed for that purpose, and would repeat the order back to the dispatcher. This permitted the dispatcher and other operators concerned to confirm the accuracy or the order. As each operator correctly repeated the order, the dispatcher would give a complete time, along with the initials of the designated railroad official for that territory. After the order was completed, it was delivered by the operator to the concerned trains as they arrived or passed the delivery point. The operating timetable indicated locations at which train crews could expect to receive train orders. If that same timetable did not require that a train receive a "Clearance Form A" before departing, then a train order signal of some type was provided to advise train crews whether or not train orders were to be delivered. Delivery was accomplished by hand, if the train stopped, or posted trackside to be grabbed by a crew member while the train continued to move past the station. With the latter, the paper order was placed in a train order fork or hoop, either held by the operator as the train passed or mounted at trackside.

The train and engine crews addressed by the order were required to observe the instructions provided in the train order, the details of which were provided by the railroad's operating rule book to be acted upon.

Australian usage
Train orders are also used in Australia, but differ a lot from their North American counterparts. There is no need for block operators, as there is direct verbal communication between the dispatcher and driver. Authority to occupy a track is received directly from the dispatcher, with the train crew filling out the details on a form, similarly to as in Track Warrant Control. At the end of their authority, the crew "fulfills" the order, after which another order may be issued for another train to occupy that track. An order can be "cancelled" if the train cannot continue for any reason (stalled, broken down, etcetera), allowing another train to occupy that line as well.

Most notably, the Trans-Australian Railway makes use of the system on most of its length.

title: Train order operation


text:
Talk:William Sterndale Bennett

Old Comment
Perhaps this article should also mention that Sterndale Bennett's grandson, Thomas Case Sterndale Bennett, was also a composer, partcularly of popular songs in the Edwardian period. -- Ian Rutt (21/04/05)

Meeting with the remarkable Mendelssohn
''A further London performance was given in June 1833. ... Among the audience was Felix Mendelssohn, who was sufficiently impressed to invite Bennett to the Lower Rhenish Music Festival in Düsseldorf.''

 * Query: My Grove (5th ed and getting increasingly dated) says the concerto had its second performance on 30 March 1833, in the Hanover Square Rooms, and that this was where Mendelssohn met WSB and invited him to Germany. They describe the date 30 March as "a crucial one".  I don't doubt other performances occurred, such as one in June, and that Mendelssohn was present at one or more of them.

 * Can we get clarity on exactly when this important first meeting happened? --  ♬  Jack of Oz  ♬  [your turn]  21:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

 * The London premiere of the D minor concerto was indeed on 30 March 1833, but the current Grove (online edition) says it was at the 26 June 1833 performance that Mendelssohn was present and invited Bennett to Germany. The ODNB concurs, as does Bennett Jr in his 1907 biography of his father. Coming at it from the other direction, in his biography of Mendelssohn R Larry Todd says that Mendelssohn met Bennett "during the summer of 1833", which is consistent with the above rather than with Blom's Grove. Moreover, in the current Grove this same Todd says that on the first of his two visits to Britain during 1833 Mendelssohn didn't arrive in London until 25 April. – Tim riley (talk) 10:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

 * That makes perfect sense. Thanks, Tim.  --  ♬  Jack of Oz  ♬  [your turn]  12:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

FA nom
(and of course anyone else who is interested) - I've now ventured to put this up for FA review with the hope of getting it on the front page on WSB's bicentenary birthday. Many thanks for your help and comments which I have tried to deal with - I've also had some useful input from WSB's ggggson Barry. I have not alas (yet) been able to deal with Ravpapa's point about WSB's personality - he seems in his published letters relatively unrevealing (in a typical Victorian way) about his own feelings.....--Smerus (talk) 12:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Recordings
I have added a recording of a song by Bennett. I have also tried to find other performers of Bennett's works on YouTube who are willing to change the licenses to CC3.0 so we can include them in the article - so far without luck.

I will also try to make a recording of his piano trio in the next few weeks.

Regards,

--Ravpapa (talk) 12:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

 * !תודה רבה--Smerus (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Lead
I would like to suggest a lead to this article which focuses more on Bennett's accomplishments than on his biography. Here is what I suggest:

William Sterndale Bennett (13 April 1816 – 1 February 1875) was an English composer, pianist, conductor and music educator. Protégé of Felix Mendelssohn and friend of Robert Schumann, he is considered Britain's leading composer of the early romantic period, a time when there was a dearth of musical creativity in Britain. As an educator, he taught a generation of composers who were the first generation of a new, characteristically British school of music. As an administrator, he founded and led numerous musical institutions in Britain, and rescued the faltering Royal Academy of Music from bankruptcy, building it into the leading music conservatory of Britain.

A child prodigy, Bennett was enrolled in the Royal Academy of Music at the age of 10. At 16, he performed his first piano concerto with orchestra. At 20, he had already built a reputation as a concert pianist.

A prolific composer early in his career, Bennett wrote six piano concertos, two symphonies, overtures, choral works, and a wealth of piano pieces. But as his teaching and administrative work grew, he found less and less time for composition. His style was conservative and restrained; Bennett's student Charles Villiers Stanford said his music "reflected the quite atmosphere of the English countryside," making him, possibly, the first composer to seek a specifically British idiom in his music. On the other hand, as musical romanticism advanced, Bennett remained steadfastly conservative in his compositions, leading contemporary critics to view his music as stodgy and out of step.

Bennett numbered among his students composers who were to be the founders of a distinctively British school of composition: Arthur Sullivan, Hubert Parry, Tobias Mathay, and others. He taught at the Royal Academy of Music, where he was also appointed principal, at Queen's College, London, and the University of Cambridge. He directed the Philharmonic Society, was a founder of the Bach Society in London. He took over principalship of the Royal Academy of Music in 1866, when the institution was on the brink of closure. An assertive administrator, Bennett lobbied Parliament to resume a cancelled annuity, and doubled the size of the student body during his tenure.

He was knighted in 1871. He died in London in 1875 and was buried in Westminster Abbey.

If this lead finds favor with the editors, I will also add an introductory paragraph to the section on Music, discussing the musical environment of Britain at the time, and the "Englishness" of Bennett's compositional style. I will also add a paragraph about his personality in the "Family" section. --Ravpapa (talk) 13:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

 * Thanks for this. I like a number of things about this approach but I would make the following points:
 * The lead should typically be no more than four paragraphs.( see WP:LEADLENGTH)
 * The last para should imo be a sort of summary and should ideally say something about Bennett today (that he has been gradually revived and recorded, that there are some events for his bicentenary)
 * You could get round this by merging paras 2 and 3 in your version, and paras 4 and 5, leaving room for a summary para 4.
 * I would avoid phrases like 'stodgy and out of step' in the article, let alone the lead. (Anyway you've already called him 'conservative and restrained', and repetition especially in the lead is a no-no).

 * I think the article already gives examples (directly and indirectly) of the musical environment of England in WSB's time - perhaps it would not be advisable to load this too much in what is essentially a biographical article - the topic perhaps belongs to the (presently dismally poor) article Music of the United Kingdom. I will be interested to see how you tackle the "Englishness" of his style - I thought of attempting this but couldn't see a way into it. As you know the article is currently up for FA so it would be good to avoid anything that can't be clearly sourced and referenced. NB: I wouldn't say that the RAM was 'the leading', but 'a leading' - as there is the Royal College of Music, as well.....The phrase 'making him, possibly, the first composer to seek a specifically British idiom in his music' is imo highly suspect - reeks a bit of WP:OR. After all, there are Byrd, Tallis and Purcell....and in the early romantic period Pinto......  .Best, --Smerus (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

 * Regarding the Englishness of Bennett's music, I was planning on quoting from Stanford's article: "He was affected, it is true, by his intercourse with Germany and his close friendships with Germans, but he maintained his British characteristics throughout his life. In a former article which I contributed to this Review, I said: "The English take a kind of pride in concealing their feelings and emotions, and this is reflected in their folk-song. The Thames has no rapids and no falls; it winds along under its woods in a gentle stream, never dry and never halting; it is the type of the spirit of English folkmusic. .... England is as remote from Keltic fire and agony, as the Thames is from the Spey." Bennett was a typical specimen of this English characteristic. He was a poet, but of the school of Wordsworth rather than of Byron and Shelley." And on Cobbett: "There dwellsin Benntt's music a kind of Wordworthian gentleness, which as stanfor\d wrote 'refleted the quite atmosphere of the English countryside'". Also, I would point to the dominance of English themes and English poetry in his oevre.

 * As for musical environment, the article refers all the time to this, but as it is never stated explicitly, I think most readers will miss it. I was thinking of only a shortish paragraph, and maybe a quote from Mendelssohn's letter, to tie it all together: "... since [your compositions] took root in the minds of the true amateurs, my countrymen became aware that music is the same in England as in Germany, as everywhere; and so by your successes here you destroyed that prejudice which nobody could ever have destroyed but a true genius."

 * As for the lead in general, the question is whether you think this approach is an improvement on the current lead. I like it better, but if we don't all agree, there's no point in changing it just because of me. --Ravpapa (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

 * The Stanford quote is excellent, I have cut it down a little and placed it in the article, many thanks. NB the Mendelssohn quote is in the article already, under 'Reception' which I think makes the point you suggest. Best,--Smerus (talk) 12:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Bicentenary
"In his bicentenary year of 2016, several concerts of his music have been planned." - I would guess that very soon that should include "performed" in some way. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:William Sterndale Bennett


text:
Talk:Katamari Damacy

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Katamari Damacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150721201850/http://www.1up.com/reviews/katamari-damacy_6 to http://www.1up.com/reviews/katamari-damacy_6
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/65PxiEgF2?url=http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/all/bestof2004/day2w_2.html to http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/all/bestof2004/day2w_2.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150721212322/http://www.1up.com/news/katamari-damacy-wins-design-award to http://www.1up.com/news/katamari-damacy-wins-design-award
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130509034310/http://www.1up.com/reviews/katamari-damacy_3 to http://www.1up.com/reviews/katamari-damacy_3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927212803/http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3163131 to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3163131
 * Added tag to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3173445
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120106151326/http://www.1up.com/news/tgs-katamari-damacy-returns to http://www.1up.com/news/tgs-katamari-damacy-returns
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306101940/http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3156800 to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3156800

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:04, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katamari Damacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150729124955/http://www.usgamer.net/articles/the-15-best-games-since-2000-number-15-through-11/page-4 to http://www.usgamer.net/articles/the-15-best-games-since-2000-number-15-through-11/page-4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

The original prototype
Recent info in regards to Katamari Damacy has surfaced and turns out that the original prototype of the game was actually developed on the GameCube: https://nintendoeverything.com/katamari-damacys-prototype-was-initially-made-on-the-gamecube/ Do The Math (talk) 23:00, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there's going to be a book soon, Kotaku has a good summary/exerpt that I need to include to reflect that. --M asem (t) 05:30, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Katamari Damacy


text:
Olga Guillot

Olga Guillot (October 9, 1923 – July 12, 2010 ) was a Cuban singer who was known as the "Queen of Bolero". She was a native of Santiago de Cuba.

Biography
Daughter of Catalan-Jewish immigrants who moved to Cuba, her father was a tailor and her mother was a seamstress. Olga Guillot was born in Santiago de Cuba, and her family moved to Havana when she was five years old. As a teenager, she and her sister, Ana Luisa, performed as the "Duo Hermanitas Guillot." It wasn't until 1945 that her talent as a bolero singer was discovered, when Facundo Rivero, an influential man in the Cuban music scene of the era, heard her sing for the first time and helped her make her professional singing debut at a famous Havana night club. Soon after, Guillot met Miguelito Valdés, who took her to New York City, where Guillot was able to record her first album with the Decca label.

She gained recognition in the United States with her version in Spanish of "Stormy Weather" in 1946.

Guillot traveled to Mexico in 1948. There, she established herself as an international singer and actress, appearing in various films and making her second album. In Mexico, Guillot began to enjoy much popularity for the first time in her career.

In 1954, she recorded her song "Miénteme" ("Lie to Me") by the Mexican composer Chamaco Domínguez, and which became a huge hit across Latin America and earned her three consecutive awards back home in Cuba as Cuba's best female singer.

1958 proved to be an important year for Guillot, as she toured Europe for the first time, performing in Italy, France, Spain and Germany. She sang alongside the legendary Édith Piaf at a concert held in Cannes.

Olga Guillot kept a house in Cuba as she traveled around the world, along with her house in Mexico. But Guillot opposed Fidel Castro's regime, and in 1962 she decided to leave Cuba for good and establish herself in Venezuela. Not long after that, she left Venezuela, making Mexico her only permanent country of residence.

Meanwhile, she kept touring around the world, singing in places such as Israel, Japan and Hong Kong. In 1963, Guillot was given the Golden Palm Award as "best bolero singer of Latin America." She received the award in Hollywood, California. Guillot sang in 1964 at New York's famed Carnegie Hall, becoming the first Latin artist to sing there. During her career, she performed alongside superstars of music such as Frank Sinatra, Sarah Vaughan, and her close friend and fellow Cuban exile, the great Celia Cruz.

Guillot continued touring for the next forty years, releasing over fifty albums and winning numerous awards for her achievements in the music world. She was very good friends with Celia Cruz, whom she often referred to as "(her) sister". When Cruz died from cancer, Guillot was very bereaved over the loss of her close friend and compatriot. She was the godmother of singer José José. Guillot lived mainly in Mexico and had another home on Miami Beach, Florida.

Death
On July 12, 2010, Guillot died of a heart attack at the age of 87 in Miami Beach, Florida. She is survived by one daughter, Olga Maria Touzet-Guillot, born from her relationship with pianist and composer, René Touzet.

Discography
Please note that the dating information was obtained mostly from The Cristóbal Díaz Ayala collection at FIU and from the original recordings when available. The discography is not complete as there are other recordings and reissues outstanding. Updated September 2, 2017.

With Panart Records

 * 3105 Sus Primeros Éxitos (1946)
 * LP3105 Olga Guillot Sus Primeros Éxitos (1962) Reissue

With Puchito Records

 * LPP-101 Olga Guillot La Mejor Voz Cancionera de Cuba (1954)
 * LPP-102 Olga Guillot (1955)
 * LPP-104 Olga Guillot (1956)
 * LPP-509 Olga Guillot (1954)
 * MLP-515 Romance y Melodia (1957)
 * MLP-525 Olga Guillot (1958)
 * MLP-526 Intimidades con Olga Guillot (1958)
 * MLP-530 Creaciones de la Guillot (1959)
 * MLP-538 Olga en Mexico (1959)
 * MLP-555 Olga de Cuba (1960)
 * MLP-559 Comunicando (1960)
 * MLP-564 Lo mejor de Olga Guillot (1963)
 * MLP-580 La Insuperable Olga (1964)

With Musart Records

With Oasis/Musart Records With Aro Records With Trébol/Musart With Codiscos/Trebol With Dardo Records With Disco Records
 * D-342 Intimidades con Olga Guillot (1958)
 * DM-292 Olga Guillot (1959)
 * 402 Con Amor (1959)
 * D-435 Olga en Mexico (1959)
 * D-528 Canciones a la Guillot
 * D-574 Olga en Cuba (1960)
 * DM-672 Olga (1961)
 * DM-751 Olga Guillot y Las Canciones de Maria Grever (1962)
 * D-855 La Temperamental (1963)
 * DM-935 Añorando el Caribe (1964)
 * DM-959 12 Exitos Romanticos Voy (1964)
 * DC-1011 Los Éxitos de Olga Guillot
 * DM-1060 Mas Exitos Romanticos de Olga Guillot (1965)
 * DM-1180 Y Siguen los Éxitos de Olga Guillot (1966)
 * DM-1256 Gracias America
 * DM-12561 Bravo (1967)
 * D-1280 Olga Guillot No, Celoso (1967)
 * DM-1312 Olga Le Canta a America (1967)
 * DM-1360 Olga Guillot interpreta a Manzanero (1967)
 * DM- 1384 Olga Guillot Interpreta sus Futuros Éxitos
 * EDM-1423 Olga Guillot Vol. 14 (1969)
 * 1472 Olga Guillot Vol. 15 (1970)
 * EDM-1472 La Mujer Que Te ama (1970)
 * DM-14501 Olga Guillot Vol. 17
 * DM-14507 Quien Da Mas (1971)
 * 1536 Olga Guillot Recuerdame (1971)
 * DM-1576 Y ahora....Olga (1972)
 * OA 323 Olga Guillot
 * OA-383 15 Éxitos de Olga Guillot (1984)
 * LP123 Vol. I Olga Guillot Sus Grandes Éxitos
 * T10210 Olga Guillot (1971)
 * T10301 Olga Guillot
 * TAT 10657 La Temperamental Olga Guillot 3 LP's
 * ELDD-50208 Epoca de Oro Olga Guillot (Colombia)
 * JDP 3645 Olga Guillot
 * JDP 3645 Comunicando con Olga Guillot
 * JDP 3648 Creaciones de La Guillot
 * D2001 Olga Guillot y El Trío Los Murcianos (1971)

Montilla Records

With CBS/Caytronics Records
 * MLP 509 Olga Guillot Orquesta Hermanos Castro (1954)

 * CYS1479 Se me olvidó otra vez (1976)
 * 19.652 Soy Lo Prohibido (1976)
 * S81646 Se me Olvidó Otra Vez (1976)

With Music Hall/ Musart Records

With Odeon Records
 * 771 Bravo
 * 775 Olga Guillot
 * 12.578 Vámonos de Fiesta
 * 12.733 Soñando Boleros
 * 12.747 La Guillot Interpreta Manzanero
 * 12.765 12 Éxitos Románticos
 * 12.773 Mas Romántico
 * 12.807 El Temperamento de la Guillot
 * 12.852 Olga de América (1971)
 * 12.876 Única Olga Guillot
 * LDS 2092 Olga Guillot y Las Canciones de Maria Grever

With Orfeon Records

With Gaviota/Cisne Records With Astral Records With AF Records With Rex/Musart Records
 * JP-2244 Olga Guillot En Concierto (1977)
 * LP-1650-5081 Olga Guillot (1977)
 * LP-LP-16H5082 Olga Guillot (1977)
 * 13.2035/9 Olga Guillot (1980)
 * EPC88544 Recuerdos de Oro Olga Guillot 2LP
 * CI-1297 Olga Guillot Total
 * CI-1301 Contigo a la Distancia
 * CGV-8110 Lo Mejor de Olga Guillot (1982)
 * CGS3710 Para Mi Publico Cuenta Conmigo Olga Guillot (1982)
 * Serie T.V.8001 Los 15 Grandes de Olga Guillot
 * R233 Sigue La Temperamental

With Ricky Records

 * LP 101 Olga Guillot Recordando El Pasado

With Tropical records

 * TRLP 5167 Voy y Copa de Vino

With Interdisc Records

 * 3054 Olga Guillot Cuenta Conmigo

With Zafiro/Musart Records

 * ML-2 Éxitos Inolvidables de Olga Guillot (1967)
 * ML-11 Olga Le Canta A America (1967)
 * ZV-848 Olga Guillot (1975)

With DM Records

 * 90.931/6 Olga Guillot Vámonos de Fiesta (1966)

With Adria/Antilla Records (Reissues)

 * AP-1 Época de Oro Olga Guillot Vol. 1
 * AP-2 Canciones Que Siempre Quise Grabar
 * AP-3 Olga Guillot Campanitas de Cristal
 * AP-3 (Antilla) Olga Guillot Campanitas de Cristal
 * AP-4 Blanca Navidad Olga Guillot
 * AP-4 Machito y Pavo Olga Guillot Blanca Navidad
 * AP-28 Olga Guillot No me Quieras Asi
 * AP- 29 Época de Oro Olga Guillot Vol. II
 * AP- 29 (Antilla) Época de Oro Olga Guillot
 * AP- 30 Enamorada Olga Guillot
 * Ap- 32 Olga Guillot en La Intimidad

With UA Latino

 * LT-LA114-E-2 Olga Guillot 2 LP's (1973)

With Warner Records

 * 87844-2 Faltaba yo CD (2001)

Filmography

 * Venus de Fuego (Mexico, 1949)
 * No Me Olvides Nunca (Mexico/Cuba, 1956)
 * Yambaó – Cry of the Bewitched (Mexico/Cuba, 1957)
 * Matar Es Facil (Mexico, 1965)

title: Olga Guillot


text:
User:Jimich~enwiki

Jean-Michel Reghem

See my page on French Wikipedia: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Jimich

fr:Utilisateur:Jimich

title: User:Jimich~enwiki


text:
User talk:Dimator

Welcome
Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions and your note on my talk page. I've been hoping to have an Assyrian speaker contributing here for a while. I know Assyrian Neo-Aramaic could do with expansion, and the Assyrian article is in a poor state (we've been trying to revise it for months). It is often difficult to find the balanced and neutral point of view for these articles. Please help out wherever you can. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

--Gareth Hughes 09:55, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Aramaic Wiktionary
Seeing your knowledge in Aramaic, I believe that you may be interested in something that has been recently proposed on Meta. :-) אמר Steve Caruso ( desk / AMA ) •  Give Back Our Membership!  06:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dimator


text:
User talk:Jayseye

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

It's not necessary to sign your articles, only your comments to other users. Each article is a collaborative effort, and a complete revision history is available through the page history link.

Also, since some of the drivers there are not device drivers, I would like to move it again to Driver wrapper. This is the last move, sorry for the runaround. Gazpacho 09:57, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jayseye


text:
File:Personal Public Service Number.jpg

Summary
Source: Department of Social Welfare, Ireland

Rationale for fair use: the logo of a national economic and social service, the service is provided to a significant proportion of the population and the use of the logo helps identify and illustrate the service.

title: File:Personal Public Service Number.jpg


text:
The Museum of Everything

The Museum of Everything is a BBC Radio 4 comedy sketch show, written by and starring Marcus Brigstocke, Danny Robins and Dan Tetsell. The programme is based on the trio's earlier live sketch show of the same name, which was performed at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe in 2002. The first series was broadcast in 2004, a second series in 2005 and a third series in 2006. It is set in an English provincial museum - 'the only museum where you can experience the history of everything'. Lucy Montgomery also features. The programme is produced by Alex Walsh-Taylor and the music is written by Dominic Haslam and Ben Walker.

Series 1

 * 1) Welcome to the Museum of Everything
 * 2) A Very Important Visitor
 * 3) School Parties Welcome
 * 4) To Infinity and Beyond
 * 5) The History of Everything
 * 6) The History of the Future

Series 2

 * 1) The Museum Reopens
 * 2) The Dig
 * 3) Under New Management
 * 4) The Coach Trip
 * 5) By Royal Appointment
 * 6) Behind the Magic

Series 3

 * 1) The Museum Reopens
 * 2) Natural Science
 * 3) The Thing
 * 4) And The Winner Is…
 * 5) The Expo
 * 6) Transport

title: The Museum of Everything