text:
User talk:Algarrobo

Welcome to the Wikipedia
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library

For more information click  here . You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.

Sam Spade 12:17, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Algarrobo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Rubén Aguilar -

Nomination of Rubén Aguilar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rubén Aguilar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rubén Aguilar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Algarrobo


text:
User talk:Mehrshad123

Welcome to the Wikipedia
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library

For more information click  here . You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.

Sam Spade 12:17, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Update on my Editing Activities
''' To those of you pondering my prolonged inactivity as editor on Wikipedia, I am continuing my protest of questionable activities by certain Wikipedia administrators including violation of Wikipedia's arbitration rules for the sake of personal interests and POV, fraudulent deletion of edit histories aimed at covering up disputed facts in order to falsely blame disputes on people they do not agree with for personal reasons and their gang-like alliances.

Everyone knows that Wikipedia is not the place for advertising people, products or POV for personal gain or for the benefit of corporations and yet these principles are repeatedly violated by these gangs of administrators.

I will continue to limit my edits to occasional minor fixes of articles in protest of these continued acts of fraud, cover-up and retaliaion.'''Mehrshad123 (talk) 00:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

[NOTE: I was just passing through and reading your page -- I completely agree with you. 75.61.98.195 (talk) 23:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)]

RFA Standing
'''Thank you for the feedback and the guidelines.

Some of the suggestions you provided have been already fulfilled, and I will steadily strive to intensify my partnership in the coming months.

Regards. ''' Mehrshad123 01:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Note
<<>>

Thanks for the lengthy comment, however my page had been attacked without explanation and I had to do a lengthy investigation to find out that two people, including yourself, were retaliating because a legitimate edit I had made to the Tevanian article. A more appropriate place for a discussion would have been on the Tevanian page, and the false accusations were totally uncalled for, especially considering that the reason for the retaliation was not initially clear. Also you mentioned that the Tevanian article and my RV cleanup was the reason my RFA had failed. You are mistaken. The RFA failed due to other reasons regarding minimum contribution requirements to Wikipedia which I currently do not meet. The quality of my contributions, and my response to RV has been exempulary and you are free to research that here. Mehrshad123 20:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Er, did you just call me a sockpuppet on my talkpage, or did I read that wrong? And I'm not sure what it is you are referring to by RV...RV is an abbreviation for "revert". ⇒    SWAT Jester    On Belay!  00:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Um, did you just call me a sockpuppet on Swatjester's talk page, or did I read that wrong? Bete Noir 09:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Sparta
Hello Mehrshad, Would you please take a look at Sparta. The current introduction says Sparta was a superpower that "overpowered" both Athens and Persia. I think this is wrong because the link says that a superpower is able to "project power on a worldwide scale;", which I think does not apply to Sparta. I have tried moving the text to farther down the article by users Miskin and Domitius insist on keeping it in the introduction. Regards, NN 19:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

 * You are correct that Sparta was a greek City State, not a superpower - either militarily or geographically. I will take a look at the article for you...Mehrshad123 23:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Mehrshad, Thanks for your work with Sparta. The current introduction certainly is not balanced. Classical times stretched over a thousand years, and Sparta was strong militarily for only a small part of this. Also note you have already made 3 reverts, so as per Wiki policy you cannot do any more for the next 24 hours. Regards, NN 00:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

He sure "took a look alright". Speaking of 3 reverts already, your "look" is by default equivalent to rv-warring. Miskin 00:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi you are missing the point - and I am already aware of the 3 revert rule and you must have seen it written above so what was the point of this?Mehrshad123 00:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Mehrshad123, take it from me. Revert warriors rarely become admins and those with a record of 3RR violations extremely rarely become admins. I was just trying to ensure that you knew about it - if you already knew and my notification was redundant there's no need to get upset.--Domitius 00:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Block of Editor
Please take a look at this: NN 18:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update. I have filed a protest and a request for a change to the protected page... Mehrshad123 05:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Read your message on my talk page. Thanks for your efforts. NN 05:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

The matter has been resolved with an apology from Yannismarou. Thanks for your time. Please try to be polite and stay within Wiki policy. That is the best way to make sure your voice is heard, as I think my case demonstrates. NN 14:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I am glad to hear it was settled favorably according to policy. Thanks for the tip! Mehrshad123 20:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Reza Shah Page
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Faranbazu 00:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC) (last warning)

 * According to the discussions page, the consensus from the editors is that you are the vandal. I was simply restoring the page after you repeatedly vandalized it with political POV.  Regarding "blocking" me - please be my guest! :) Mehrshad123 00:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Faranbazu, congratulations on getting yourself and your sockpuppets banned for personal attacks and sockpuppetry. Mehrshad123 20:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Email
Doroud, Mehrshad. Could you please enable receiving email from other users in your preferences? I would like to contact you. Shervink 08:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Shervink
 * Thanks for pointing that out Shervin. It should be fixed now. Please let me know if you still cannot get through. Mehrshad123 18:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Hi Mehrshad, I hope you and Shervin continue to contribute in wikipedia. However it is important that both of you try to rely on facts. I know that in the Middle East people are found of conspiracy theories. But in an incyclopedia one needs facts. In fact, if you guys want to be monarchist, its your choice. However, trying to make guys like Reza khan, Hitler, or Stalin look good is absurd and futile. Cheers Faranbazu 04:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Faranbazu, thanks for the stupid and inflamatory comment. And if I was a "Middle East Person", I might know what you are talking about. On another note, you have commited yet another violation of wikipedia policy in removing the Sockpuppet tag from your user page.

Note
There is no need to place the sockpuppetry removal warning on both Faranbazu's talk page and the article talk page. Just keep it on Farahbazu's page, thanks. The Behnam 06:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

300 edit
I won't reinstate them until there is a good reason to. The petition is already mentioned enough. To talk about it more is giving it undue weight, and to use the site as a source is not reliable. The changes you made did not improve the article. Anyway, I started a section on the talk page to discuss your edit, so reply there if you still object. See Talk:300 (film). The Behnam 07:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Where did you get the idea that an online petition is "official". I suggest that you not reinstate your edit again, and don't give me orders.  Thanks.  The Behnam 18:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * We already have reliable sources mentioning the petitions so I don't know why you insist upon adding the claims linked & derived from a petition's webpage. It is simply not necessary, in addition to not being in accord with WP source requirements.
 * No, we really aren't seeing fact-checking and reliability with that website. Please read WP:RS.  Besides, some of what you were adding seemed to be your own conclusion based upon the Greek names in the petition, and hence violated WP:NOR.  In any case, the reliability issue is the main thing here, so I again recommend you don't add that back into the article.  Cheers.  The Behnam 18:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There is no reason to get upset. PetitionsOnline.com is a widely used resource for collecting electronic signatures which have been legislated as a valid as a paper and ink. Mehrshad123 18:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see why you accuse me of being upset; I am just explaining policy to you. Also, why did you copy this response from my talk page over here too? Anyway, if you aren't going to add anything more to your defense of the inclusion I think we are done on this matter.  The Behnam 18:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read the MSN Associated Press article which was provided as the second of two sources - or is that an "unreliable" as well? When someone tells me not to give them orders and then starts giving me orders (look above) then obviously they are upset. Mehrshad123 19:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I gave you suggestions, not orders. Anyway, I view your new edition as simply an expansion of the former version so I don't really have a problem with it.  Perhaps other users will consider it unnecessary to expand that in the lead, but I will let them argue that.  I did remove an informal wording ("ever-increasing amount").  I believe we are settled on this matter.  Have a good one.  The Behnam 19:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I did order you not to give me orders, but that's about it. The Behnam 19:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The reason why petitions (online or otherwise) are not very reliable is that there is a lot of potential fraud with their use and subsequent citation. I am sure I could go to 100 very opinionated guys who are good with computers and tell them to create a petition against the sun being too bright, and they could quite easily generate a petition thousands of names long, from different IP addresses with different names. If you think that's far-fetched, something very much like that happens a great deal specifically in political campaigns. The petition might be genuine, but because of the potential for fraud, they are not reliable, as per WP:RS. I hope that explains things. Arcayne 19:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * A similar analogy can be made about traditional "paper and ink" petitions. I don't think there is much of a motive here for people to submit many signatures since it has no material benefit besides making a statement of protest. It was a judgement call on my part to consider it as very convincing evidence that thousands do not approve of certain aspects of 300's content. (And yes I signed it too, as well as many Greeks) Mehrshad123 21:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

NPA
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Specifically this edit, where you called another user a "troll." The Behnam 23:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Was this meant to go on the page of the troll that was attacking all the editors including me? Mehrshad123 00:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

3RR
Please do not threaten User:TheBenham with a 3RR complaint. His edits are called good-faith edits, and do not meet the criteria for 3RR, which is usually used to term those edits which are solely designed to create an edit war.Arcayne 01:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Also wanted to apologize for putting this comment on your User Page instead of here. Oops. Arcayne 02:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi please could you please refer me to this "threat"? Mehrshad123 10:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

New References for Reza Shah 's alleged relations with Nazis

 * Dear Mehrshad, I have added two new references Keddie and Sullivan. Would it be agreeable to you? I have alot more, but it is time cosuming to type everything. You asked me if I am turk, I wonder what gave you this idea. I am of Persian stock. Would you please let me know what is the evidence on me being sock puppets? The tag you put in my user page says that if you have not created the evidence page linked to my user page I can remove the tag.

I am not bothered by that tag. It can stay as long as you desire. However, I don't like it when you remove my edits, which are well supported by citations. If you need more citations please feel free to demand, and I will provide you. After all, this is my field. I also appreciate if you can support your arguments with valid citations. Cheers Faranbazu 05:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please stop the nonesense. You are working against many editors of many backgrounds and ethnicities. Mehrshad123 10:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Would you please be kind enough to let me know what do you mean? All I ask you is to provide support for your argument. This is the way disputes are resolved.Faranbazu 18:39, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * What? What do you call the sources and arguments presented on the Reza Shah Discussion page over the last week by myself and the other editors? Mehrshad123 21:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Have you given any reference by a credible source that Reza Shah was not a Nazi sympatizer?

Faranbazu 02:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not what the discussion was about. You are changing the subject, or you are saying that we should write lies about him because he is a "nazi sympathizer" in your words. Mehrshad123 02:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

 * But there are hundreds of references in English, French, and even German that verify he was so. What reason do you have that he was not.
 * if you are refering to "Master Race" discussion again there are numerous documents that prove Reza Shah Believed that Aryans are a superior race. Faranbazu 03:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

300
Hullo, a quick note to explain why I've removed this passage (I've explained it on talk, but it's been archived and perhaps not so easy to find):

Since its release, 300 has stirred up controversy with accusers labelling it as part of a series of Hollywood films with political overtones aimed predominantly at Iranian and other Asian cultures.

Unless I'm missing something, the AP story cited says nothing about "a series of Hollywood films" (it only mentions 300), nor about "other Asian cultures." So really we're left with "stirred up controversy"; which is reflected in the last line of the lead as it currently stands. Best, --Javits2000 22:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks to All
I would like to thank everyone in helping successfully expose the troll User:Faranbazu /User:Artaxerex and his "meatpupets" and "sockpuppets": Confirmed and suspected sockpuppets and meatpuppets of User:Artaxerex

User:Yima

User:Faranbazu

User:Napht

User:Melca

User:Arteban1

User:140.80.199.91

We have yet to successfully enforce rules regarding personal attacks from the above trolls but the most important part of the work has been done. Again, thank you very much for donating so much of your time for the sake of Truth and Fact.

Now let's get the Reza Shah page unlocked so we can begin the long process of undoing all the vandalism over the last few months!

Mehrshad123 19:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

RE:Reza Shah article can now be Unlocked for Vandalism Correction
I have unprotected the article because it has been 17 days since it was fully protected. Please note that the article was protected due to an Edit war, and protection is not an endorsement of the protected version (see The Wrong Version). -Royalguard11 (Talk·Review Me!) 21:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Great thanks. Mehrshad123 21:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Civility
You need to stay civil. Your posts on Talk:Reza Shah and elsewhere have been grossly uncivil and I do not recommend that you continue on this course. And it has been noticed that you put my name in quotes, and appropriate judgments have been made. Cheers. The Behnam 12:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It is interesting that a person with a history of Personal Attacks against my self and others as well as vandalism of my User Talk page should make such a statemant. This is another request for you to Please read Wikipedia policy before "preaching" to myself and others again.  Mehrshad123 19:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * My reply is in the corresponding section of my user talk page. Cheers.  The Behnam 01:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Blocked link
I saw your post to User:Betacommand. He isn't an admin anymore, so I doubt he can help you. Plus, with the flurry of hate mail that his bot has stirred up, he probably won't respond to you any time soon. I'm not sure the right place to go, but you might try WP:SPAM. I would guess that they have a link to the list of blocked sites or whatever committee oversees this. --GentlemanGhost 23:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration started
Greetings. Please have a look at this, since you are listed as an involved party on this request. Shervink 14:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Artaxerex
Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Artaxerex. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Artaxerex/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Artaxerex/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ArbComBot 22:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The aforementioned arbitration case is closed. Artaxerex is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year. The parties are reminded of the need to adhere closely to the neutral point of view policy. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 20:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Dorood bar shoma, mikhastam bebinam age mitooni ba man yeh tamas begir; koollifeg at yahoo com ...moheme. Sepas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Armaiti (talk • contribs) 21:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You welcome
Actually, These users are all one person (It's all the game this man playing with us), and he just wanna denounce the alliance of greens! Usually these users have no stable political and even a normal belief, Somedays ago he accused me as a separatist! we cann't understand what's their main point ! --Parthava (talk) 03:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

A few points
(1) Wikipedia is not for soap-boxing, keep your opinions about X or Y movement to yourself (2) Your edit on Farokhzad constitutes original research, all reliable sources name the Islamic Republic as the main suspect in his murder. This is sourced, you're not allowed to remove this, unless you have a WP:RS that disputes this. (3) Please read WP:3RR, and stop making so many reverts on that page. --Kurdo777 (talk) 05:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Once again you are making false accusations in order to cover up your political movement on wikipedia. Nice try, but all I did was remove unsourced propaganda material you put there. No new information was added aside what was already in sources provided by other editors.  DO NOT TOUCH THIS ARTICLE AGAIN!--Mehrshad123 (talk) 22:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Green traitors
I'm afraid I've given up on this a long time ago. There are just so many of these fanboys of traitor Green movement flooding wiki with propaganda that it's impossible to make any green related article neutral at the moment. But maybe in a year time or so, when the movement has completely died down (it's already mostly dead since the Ashura terror) some of these articles can be re-written.Kermanshahi (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Please read and vote
Talk:Greco-Persian Wars —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.128.9 (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:ANI notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --  At am a  頭 18:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

No more personal attacks against other editors
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --  At am a  頭 21:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your attention to the matter. The editors in question, Alefbe, CordeliaNaismith and others are deliberately posting false information into articles related to Iran as part of an anti-Iranian political campaign on Wikipedia which they are promoting on their discussion pages. If you read the discussion page for the Fereydun Farkhzad article, the personal attacks are from Alefbe and CordeliNaismith not me. Also CordeliNaismith's claim that "Alefbe" started the discussion on this topic is a lie as much as the false content this editor is deliberately posting on Wikipedia in Iran-related articles. I was the one that started the discussion (titled "Please help clean up Fabricated Content..."): In fact Alefbe IGNORED this discussion and encouraged CordeliNaismith to also ignore the discussion, specifically saying things like "Cordelia, you are too patient with Mehrshad123. Enough is already said. Don't reward him with a lengthy discussion.". If anyone is starting a Personal Attack it is Alefbe, and I am the victim, not the perpatrator. My response to the vandalism and edit war has been exteremely patient and civil. I responded to Alefbe's vandalism and edit war on his discussion page as follows: No one doubts Farokhzad's opposition to the Iranian government, however his main target was Islam as a religion, more than the government - The sources provided in the article suggest that he may have been murdered by an arab hit squad operating in Europe. This "editor" ignored my comments and contributions as usual and reposted the same lies in the article by simply doing a full revision.  I strongly suggest this group of editors be (at the very least) warned about the consequences of their exteremly rude and inapropriate behavior!--Mehrshad123 (talk) 21:36, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've already spoken to Alefbe regarding their failure to rely on discussion to resolve disputes, and specifically the request to squelch discussion that you've cited. But you can't accuse people of being members of political organizations if they haven't declared such on Wikipedia, that's harassment per WP:OUTING which we are strongly against, and when those organizations are also considered terrorist organizations, such accusations are also considered personal attacks. Ignore such affiliations, focus on the inappropriate inclusion of information and don't focus or even draw attention to what you suspect about the people behind those edits. You've also warned editors to not edit the article any more, which is a violation of WP:OWN (see your response to Kurdo777 above). I disagree that you've been civil in the discussion on the talk page of the article, ending a paragraph by saying "THIS IS AN ENCYCLOPEDIA ARTICLE!" is not being calm at all. Take it down a notch. --  At am a  頭 21:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I forgot to add, if you leave a message on someone's talk page, and they remove it, don't put it back, per WP:HUSH. An editor removing a message you leave is acknowledging that they have read the message, and it's not necessary to restore it. --  At am a  頭 21:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I was simply trying to emphasize that most of the sources they were citing can be traced to the MKO, which suggested an affiliation. As stated earlier, the discussion pages of these editors clearly have tags which show political afficliations and personal involvement in related anti-Iranian political movements - this automatically disqualifies them from editing such articles as per Wikipedia rules which I am certain you are already familiar with.--Mehrshad123 (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Tracing sources to the MKO is fine. Not only fine, but very useful in determining the reliability of those sources. Accusing editors of being terrorists is very, very, very far from fine. You need to stop doing so from this point on, I'm giving you a chance to keep your clean block record here, especially as you've been very civil with me so far and I want to give you the benefit of the doubt. Nobody you've claimed to have affiliations to such groups have much of anything on their user pages (Alefbe's is even blank), nor have they in the past (I checked the history of their pages). Even if they did declare political affiliations, our conflict of interest guidelines don't discriminate for religious or political beliefs, only for having ties to organizations or other direct links to the subjects they are editing about. And even if they did have conflicts of interest, it still wouldn't automatically prevent them from being able to edit those articles, it would just bring their edits extra scrutiny. The bottom line is, stop accusing people of spreading propaganda for, or being members of terrorist groups. If sources aren't reliable, then make your case about those sources, but only comment on sources and article content, not editors. Thank you. --  At am a  頭 22:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Atama, this is a very serious accusation. Could you please show me where I referred to someone as a terrorist? I think you've made a mistake here. The MKO is an anti-Iranian political organization with thousands of members, many of whom are now active on Wikipedia for the sole purpose of planting propaganda especially after the June elections. It has been classified by the U.S. as well as the Iranian government as a "terrorist organization", however it has offices in Europe which operate as a political wing, and even if I did accuse someone of being "MKO", that does not imply that they are a terrorist.--Mehrshad123 (talk) 01:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Mehrshad, I think that it would make it much easier to discuss this article if you would remember to assume good faith. I'm not really understanding your objection to the current article version, and also am not especially appreciating the personal attacks. In particular, I'd appreciate if you could refactor your latest comment. The version that you keep reverting this article to just does not have sources for the disputed bits. If you think that I am trying to push some political agenda here, why don't you start a request for comment so that some uninvolved editors can take a look at the article? Thanks, CordeliaNaismith (talk) 23:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Cordelia, beautifully put. However, the lie you wrote about me in the "secret complaint" you and Alefbe filed against me was immediatley recognized and shot down. You have established yourself as a Liar and a Vandal. And you still insist on us taking your propaganda edits seriously?--Mehrshad123 (talk) 01:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you've misunderstood my comment on ANI, I didn't say that Alefbe started the conversation, but that he participated in it, which is true. Try having another look at it, and please calm down. If you continue with personal attacks like these, you will almost certainly get blocked. CordeliaNaismith (talk) 01:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

 * There was nothing to misunderstand. You very clearly lied. And you are lying again right now! Do you really think we are that stupid?--Mehrshad123 (talk) 01:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

 * No, you can't undo an admin's declining of your unblock request. That should be self-evident. Talk page access revoked. Tim Song (talk) 02:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Not quite sure how you explain this away as "not POV pushing". Nefariousski (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Mehrshad123


text:
Luis de Grandes Pascual

Luis de Grandes Pascual (born 27 January 1945 in Guadalajara) is a Spanish politician and Member of the European Parliament with the People's Party (PP), part of the European People's Party and sits on the European Parliament's Committee on Transport and Tourism.

He is a substitute for the Committee on Legal Affairs, a member of the Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee and a substitute for the Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America.

Grandes entered politics in 1977 when he was elected as a UCD deputy for Guadalajara in the Spanish General Election. He was re-elected in 1979 but lost his seat at the 1982 election. When the UCD disbanded in February 1983, he joined the Democratic Popular Party (PDP) and returned to Congress at the 1986 election. The PDP merged with other parties in 1989 to form the current PP, for whom he was re-elected at the 1989, 1993, 1996, 2000 and 2004 General Elections.

Education

 * Graduate in law
 * Law degree and doctoral studies (Law Faculty, Complutense University, Madrid)
 * Practising lawyer and member of the bar associations of Guadalajara and Alcalá de Henares (Madrid)
 * Secretary-General for Youth in the National Executive of the UCD party
 * UCD National Organisation Secretary
 * National Secretary-General of the Christian Democrats (PDP)
 * Member of the PP National Executive Committee
 * Chairman of the PP Provincial and Regional Electoral Committee

Career

 * 1983-1987 and 1991-1995: Member of the Regional Parliament of Castile-La Mancha and spokesman of the PP parliamentary group
 * 1996-2000 and 2000-2004: Member of the Spanish Congress of Deputies (1977–1979, 1979–1982, 1986–1989, 1993–1996
 * 1996-2004: Spokesman for the PP parliamentary group in the Spanish Congress of Deputies
 * 1977-1979: Third Secretary of the Bureau of the Chamber of Deputies and member of the Constitutional Committee in the Constituent Assembly
 * Patron of the Foundation for Analysis and Social Studies and of the Foundation for Humanism and Democracy

Decorations

 * Order of Constitutional Merit (Spain)
 * Order of Bernardo O'Higgins (Chile)

title: Luis de Grandes Pascual


text:
Eritrean cuisine

Eritrean cuisine is based on Eritrea's native culinary traditions, but also arises from social interchanges with other regions. The local cuisine, despite featuring influences of both the Ottoman and Italian cuisines, shares similarities with the cuisine of neighboring Ethiopia and the cuisines from other African countries in the region.

Overview
Eritrean cuisine shares similarities with surrounding countries' cuisines; however, the cuisine has its unique characteristics.

The main traditional food in Eritrean cuisine is tsebhi (stew), served with injera (flatbread made from teff, wheat, or sorghum and hilbet (paste made from legumes; mainly lentil and faba beans). A typical traditional Eritrean dish consists of injera accompanied by a spicy stew, which frequently includes beef, goat, lamb or fish.

Overall, Eritrean cuisine strongly resembles that of neighboring Ethiopia, although Eritrean cooking tends to feature more seafood than Ethiopian cuisine on account of its coastal location.

Additionally, owing to its colonial history, cuisine in Eritrea features more Italian influences than are present in Ethiopian cooking, including more pasta specials and greater use of curry powders and cumin. People in Eritrea likewise tend to drink coffee. Christian Eritreans also drink sowa (a bitter fermented barley) and mies (a fermented honey beverage), while Muslim Eritreans abstain from drinking alcohol.

Common foods and dishes
When eating injera diners generally share food from a large tray placed in the centre of a low dining table. Numerous pieces of injera are layered on this tray and topped with various spicy stews. Diners break into the section of injera in front of them, tearing off pieces and dipping them into the stews.

The stews that accompany injera are usually made from beef, chicken, lamb, goat, mutton, or vegetables. Most Eritreans, with the exception of the Saho, like their food spicy and hot. Berbere, a mixture that consists of a variety of common and unusual herbs and spices, accompanies almost all dishes. Stews include zigni, made with beef; dorho tsebhi, made with chicken; alicha, a vegetable dish made without berbere; and shiro, a purée of various legumes.

When making ga'at, a ladle is used to make an indentation in the dough, which is then filled with a mixture of berbere and melted butter, and surrounded by milk or yogurt. When dining, a small piece of ga'at is dipped into the berbere and the butter sauce, and then into the milk or yogurt.

Influenced by its past as an Italian colony, Eritrean cuisine also features unique interpretations of classic Italian dishes. Among these specialties are pasta sauces spiced with berbere.

Breakfast

 * Kitcha fit-fit, a dish made from pieces of a hearty pancake tossed in clarified butter and spices. The pancake is usually made of different types of flour, or dry porridge mixed with water and other seasonings. The heat can be adjusted by pouring more or less berbere (the hot spice) on the kitcha when it is finished. Normally served for breakfast with a side of yogurt or sour milk.
 * Fit-fit, made with torn up pieces of injera and usually leftover stew. It can also be made with a mixture of onions, berbere, tomatoes, jalapeños and butter instead of leftover stews. Also called fir-fir.
 * Ga'at or akelet, a porridge made of flour and water, served in a bowl with an indentation made in the center where clarified butter and berbere are mixed; yogurt is normally put on the sides surrounding it. It is similar and related to other stiff African porridge dishes like ugali, pap and fufu.
 * Shahan ful, sauteed and mashed fava beans, served with onions, tomatoes, jalapeños, cumin, yogurt and olive oil. It is normally eaten with pieces of bread dipped in the dish to scoop out the bean mixture.
 * Panettone; due to Italian influence on Eritrea, this bread is commonly served with tea or during the coffee ceremony.

Lunch/dinner
Most dishes common to Eritrea are either meat-based or vegetable-based stews that are served over the spongy, fermented bread injera.
 * Tsebhi/Zigni—a spicy stew made with lamb, mutton, cubes of beef or ground beef and berbere
 * Dorho—a spicy stew made with berbere and a whole chicken
 * Qulwa/Tibsi—sauteed meat, onions, and berbere served with a sauce
 * Alicha—a non-berbere dish made with potatoes, green beans, carrots, green peppers, and turmeric.
 * Tihlo–a dish consisting of unfilled dumpling balls made from barley, to be dipped in a spicy meat stew.
 * Hilbet—a vegan dish consisting of a cream made from powdered fenugreek, lentils and fava beans, typically served with Silsi, tomatoes cooked with berbere.
 * Shiro—a stew made with ground chickpea flour, onions and tomatoes
 * Birsen—lentils, often cooked with onions, spices, and tomatoes. This curry can be made with or without berbere.
 * Hamli—sauteed spinach, garlic and onions

Beverages
Suwa is the name for the home-brewed beer common in Eritrea. It is made from roasted corn, barley, and other grain and is flavored with gesho, a type of buckthorn leaf. The beverage is often made for celebrations; a sweet honey wine (called mies) is also commonly served. The coffee ceremony is one of the most important and recognizable parts of Eritrean cultures. Coffee is offered when visiting friends, during festivities, or as a daily staple of life. If coffee is politely declined, then tea (shahee) will most likely be served.

Even though Eritrea has a tradition of coffee drinking for centuries, Italian-style coffee like espresso and cappuccino are extremely common in Eritrea, served in practically every bar and coffee shop in the capital Asmara.

The biggest brewery in the country is Asmara Brewery, built 1939 under the name Melotti. The brewery today produces a range of beverages. A popular beverage that is common during festivities is Eritrean-style Sambuca; in Tigrinya it is translated to areki.

List of common Italian Eritrean dishes or food
bolognese (pasta al sugo e berbere)]]
 * Eritrean-style lasagna
 * Cotoletta alla milanese (Milano cutlet)
 * Capretto
 * [[Bolognese sauce|Spaghetti
 * Frittata
 * Panettone
 * Pasta al forno
 * Pizza
 * Gelato
 * Panna cotta

title: Eritrean cuisine


text:
User talk:VernonHardapple

Welcome to the Wikipedia
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library

For more information click  here . You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.

Sam Spade 12:19, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Interested in an L.A.-area Wiki meetup?
It appears as though L.A. has never had a Wiki meetup. Would you be interested in attending such an event? If so, checkout User:Eric Shalov/Wikimeetup.

- Eric 20:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:VernonHardapple


text:
User talk:Rockingbeat

Welcome to the Wikipedia
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library

For more information click  here . You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.

Sam Spade 12:20, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Amy Winehouse has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 19:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kim's corner store
A tag has been placed on Kim's corner store requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja talk  19:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Music Magazine
A tag has been placed on The Music Magazine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Philipp Joseph of Salm-Leuze
A tag has been placed on Philipp Joseph of Salm-Leuze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 00:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy decline
Thanks for making the article about the notable person. But you have to agree that one sentence is a bit ridiculous and not having a reference to boot is very easily something that should be tagged for speedy deletion (and as you can see the other two articles you created got deleted). Can you please add a ref in and possibly add more than one sentence in? It would save everyone time (you for not having to recreate the article again, others to have to go through actually deleting it). Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 15:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mysto & Pizzi
A tag has been placed on Mysto & Pizzi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --  Transity  ( talk •  contribs ) 15:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Figge

The article William Figge has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * I can't find significant coverage for this Playboy photographer.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil ronnie
A tag has been placed on Lil ronnie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Huadpe (talk) 02:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richie Zito
A tag has been placed on Richie Zito requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 09:57, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Crest (rap group)
A tag has been placed on The Crest (rap group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 19:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Crest (rap group)
A tag has been placed on The Crest (rap group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 21:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Eeekster (talk) 23:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Philipp Joseph of Salm-Leuze

The article Philipp Joseph of Salm-Leuze has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced and very short

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 23:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mysto & Pizzi
A tag has been placed on Mysto & Pizzi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  20:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mysto & Pizzi
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mysto & Pizzi. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Mysto & Pizzi (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mysto and pizzi.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Mysto and pizzi.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of American Yakuza for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Yakuza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/American Yakuza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike  |   Talk  20:45, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

HTC Incredible 4G
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of HTC Incredible 4G, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: HTC Incredible S. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 17:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rockingbeat