text:
User talk:Friviere

If possible, use my discussion page at Wikipedia in catalan language. Thanks. Bústia de missatges -

Image:Cabina_Cessna_182.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cabina_Cessna_182.JPG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Lluís Maria Xirinacs
Done. In the future, if you upload an image to Commons under the same filename, please use. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 15:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That's ok, this mistake was mainly my fault. I didn't check commons explicitly to make sure this image had the same filename, so when the deletion was executed by an automated tool (WP:TW - way useful), it commented out all instances of image use. There are a few quirks in sharing images between the commons and individual Wikipedias, but using the same filename is definitely the way to go. On Wikipedia, there's a specific mechanism to delete on-commons images, and db-nowcommons is the preferred shortcut. Sorry for the misunderstanding, I did not mean to imply that your actions caused any problem. Regards, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 16:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Lluís Maria Xirinacs
Refering apparent suicide reported by a reputable source, pls. indicate what is a reputable source for you. When I writed the sentence you deleted, I gave all sorts of reasons, policies and references. May you please correspond before deleting?. I you had given me the opportunity to disccus the subject, as used here, I could have given you even more reasons, sources, and references--Paco ✉ 15:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Lluis killed himself. Why are you so reluctant to accept the truth? See many references on Google. WWGB 15:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

 * According to this Wikipedia content guideline, "the most reliable sources [include] mainstream newspapers". The Independent (generally recognised as a mainstream newspaper) reported that "he (Xirinacs) had apparently committed suicide". Therefore I believe that my edits were consistent with Wikipedia guidelines. WWGB 02:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Catalan
I honestly thought it was vandalism. But even if it isn't, I don't see the relationship. Especially because it's not an image of just the letter. I would discuss it with people who made the template you attached it to. Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 21:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

 * I'm sorry if I was unclear. My point was that, like Template:Spanish, there should be an image on the template itself.  But now I see that it's designed to have a different image if people so choose.  Go ahead and put it back if you'd like.  If a better image comes along we can always replace it.  Æµ§œš¹  [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]  19:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Caerwine Caer’s whines 03:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Caerwine Caer’s whines 03:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

RFC on the conduct of a user
Since you seem to be very interested on catalan history, and since you edited Coat_of_arms_of_Catalonia next to the user I opened the RFC on, I thought that you would be interested on Requests_for_comment/Sclua. Feel free to comment there

 * I sent you an email on catalan so it's easier for you to understand --Enric Naval (talk) 07:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Commonwealth of Catalonia

The article Commonwealth of Catalonia has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * there have been no improvements of sources given in over 2 years. Time to get in or get out.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tribunal de Cassació

The article Tribunal de Cassació has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * there have been no improvements of sources given in over 2 years. Time to get in or get out.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Berenguer de Cruïlles

The article Berenguer de Cruïlles has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * there have been no improvements of sources given in over 3.5 years. Time to get in or get out.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Tribunal de Cassació for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tribunal de Cassació is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tribunal de Cassació until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Commonwealth of Catalonia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commonwealth of Catalonia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Commonwealth of Catalonia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dialectal map of Catalan Language.png

A tag has been placed on File:Dialectal map of Catalan Language.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dialectal map of Catalan Language.png

A tag has been placed on File:Dialectal map of Catalan Language.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Catalan culture challenge
I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 08:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:CA-Paper plane diagram.SVG

The file File:CA-Paper plane diagram.SVG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Custom signature fix needed
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default: Solution 2: Fix your custom signature: Solution 3: Do nothing:
 * 1) Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * 2) Uncheck the box (☑→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * 3) Remove anything in the  text box.
 * 4) Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.  (Do not click the red "" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * 1) Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * 2) Click the  button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
 * 3) Update your signature to fix the error.
 * 4) Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
 * 1) In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Friviere


text:
Power door locks

Power door locks (also known as electric door locks or central locking) allow the driver or front passenger to simultaneously lock or unlock all the doors of an automobile or truck, by pressing a button or flipping a switch.

Power door locks were introduced on the luxury Scripps-Booth in 1914, but were not common on luxury cars until Packard reintroduced them in 1956. Nearly every car model today offers this feature as at least optional equipment.

Early systems locked and unlocked only the car doors. Many cars today also feature systems which can unlock such things as the luggage compartment or fuel filler cap door. It is also common on modern cars for the locks to activate automatically when the car is put into gear or reaches a certain speed.

Remote and handsfree
In 1980, Ford Motor Company introduced an external keypad-type keyless entry system, wherein the driver entered a numeric combination —either pre-programmed at the factory or one programmed by the owner— to unlock the car without the key. Early- to mid-1980s Nissan Maximas could also be installed with a keypad, which would also retract the windows and moonroof once the car was successfully unlocked by pushing a specific button on the keypad. During the 1990s the Subaru Legacy could also be opened by pulling the drivers external door handle a specific number of times to enter a passcode number that would unlock the driver's door only.

Today, many cars with power door locks also have a radio frequency remote keyless system, which allows a person to press a button on a remote control key fob, the first being available on the French made Renault Fuego in 1982. Currently, many luxury makers also allow the windows to be opened or closed by pressing and holding a button on the remote control key fob, or by inserting the ignition key and holding it in the lock or unlock position in the external driver's door lock.

The remote locking system confirms successful locking and unlocking through either a light or a horn signal, and usually offers an option to switch easily between these two variants. Both provide almost the same functionality, though light signals are more discreet while horn signals might create a nuisance in residential neighborhoods and other busy parking areas (e.g. short-term parking lots). Some manufacturers offer the ability to adjust the horn signal volume.

Other cars have a proximity system that is triggered if a keylike transducer (Advanced Key or handsfree) is within a certain distance of the car.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Power door locks


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Vu

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 23:55, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Steven Vu
Arrant nonesense (not encyclopedic). Delete. Mwanner 23:58, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Patent nonsense as it stands. -- Brhaspati\talk/contribs 00:34, 2005 Apr 13 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, nonsense. Megan1967 07:45, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense entry or at best not notable. Shanes 10:04, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a nonsense to me. jni 12:55, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Just because it may not be notable to you, does not mean it shouldn't be information that is available. We are a minority in England, and steadily growing.  Please tell me how many times any of you have been to England, let alone Kingston, Surrey.  Why don't you just delete any minor cult from this encyclopaedia? Vusionary 09:30, 14 Apr 2005 (GMT)
 * User's first edit. —Korath (Talk) 01:02, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. A relevant article about a growing phenomena.Muncher 22:51,14 Apr 2005 (GMT)
 * User's first edit. —Korath (Talk) 01:02, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Amusing but total booshwah.  Oh, and let's not forget the hosiery.  Musn't compromise my principles. - Lucky 6.9 04:11, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Talk:King of Bavaria

List of kings of Bavaria

See also List of rulers of Bavaria and History of Bavaria.

* Prince Ludwig of Bavaria, Regent 1912–1913 * Ludwig III 1913–1918 - I'm assuming it's an error that the emboldened two link to the same page. I don't know anything at all on this subject, but if I can get the answer by Google then I'll change it. If not, someone who knows what's up please fix this. Also please note that I'm just now getting into participating in Wikipedia and am still figuring out the formatting and all.
 * Maximilian I Joseph 1805–1825
 * Ludwig I Augustus 1825–1848
 * Maximilian II 1848–1864
 * Ludwig II 1864–1886
 * Otto 1886–1913 (d.1916)
 * Prince Luitpold of Bavaria, Regent 1886–1912

-Recnilgiarc

 * No, it's no error. Prince-Regen Ludwig became King Ludwig III when Otto died. - Nik42 05:39, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

 * Or rather, when Ludwig had convinced King Otto to abdicate in 1913. Otto died only in 1916.

Could the title of this page be changed to "Kingdom of Bavaria", to match similar pages on now-extinct German Kingdoms? There isn't a page on Kingdom of Bavaria, and this is a good start to one. - Ozzy Marco

Voided prank-
This paragraph was inserted by prankster User:Woofe705 cooperating with an IP, but was detected and deleted. --Wetman 01:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Ludwig's marriage
Doesn't Ludwig's new non-dynastic marriage disinherit him? --95.24.69.191 (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Prince Maximilian of Bavaria (born 2021)
Prince Maximilian of Bavaria (born 2021), son of Heinrich, is not in line? --95.24.69.191 (talk) 20:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:King of Bavaria