text:
Talk:Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg

=New=

Vote (combination of two move proposals)
Vote for as many options you like, by approval voting. If voting for option #3: please indicate what you mean by "Other"; and don't add any more options, unless the ones you name with your vote in option 3 (e.g. "keep as is or move to XXX or to YYY")

Longer comments can be added below in

Please add votes with "#" + (optional comment) + ~

Option 1: Move to Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg

 * 1) I see no reason to include a second title. The article is unclear (at least to me), but it also seems to be a courtesy title, given on the grounds of a marroage now dissolved. Septentrionalis 16:30, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Option 2: Move to Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg

 * 1) support --Francis Schonken 20:35, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Support Deb 21:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Support Prsgoddess187 22:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Support It fits with other naming conventions, the current title is just bizare. (Alphaboi867 18:25, 22 September 2005 (UTC))
 * 5) Support definately to Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. Mac Domhnaill 02:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) support Why does Arrigo always move these articles. Arrigo please stop your crusade of renaming royal articles without placing a discussion first. Gryffindor [[Image:Flag of Austria (state).svg|20px]] 23:39, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Vote count report
Seven people voted, of which six for move to Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg, summary: The move had already been operated by Deb on 27/9/2005.
 * 6 out of 7 voters voted for Option 2 = 86% > 60%, conclusion: Move to Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg

However, the cleanup after the move was not completed yet, so I: --Francis Schonken 06:17, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Clean up double redirects;
 * Remove "move" templates here, and the listings on WP:RM (trying to help out with the backlog there).

 * Sorry, Francis, I've had technical problems and I was distracted. Deb 17:13, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

=Previous=

Move?
Shouldn't this be at Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg? WP Naming conventions take out middle names in the title. (Written apparently by User:Matjlav)

 * Why was the name of this page changed from Princess of Denmark to Countess of Frederiksborg? She is still titled Princess of Denmark, and will only be "demoted" (for lack of a better term) to Countess upon any future remarriage.Prsgoddess187 14:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Oppose the requested move to Alexandra Christina, Princess of Denmark, Countess of Frederiksborg as that sort of long and repetitive titulary is clearly unencyclopedic in heading. Naming conventions instead say that if a non-reigning royal has a substantive title (such as Countess of Frederiksborg in this case), that is to be used as heading. Same as with Charles, Prince of Wales. Naming conventions are written also to prevent too long-winded royal romantics in headings here (which has been a familiar problem to those who wrote NCs, as here certainly are users who appear to be royal-romantics rather than objective encyclopedia-writers), as such will only make this encyclopedia seem ridiculous. Arrigo 08:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Approve renaming to Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. Acceptable per NC. Arrigo 09:53, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Well if her title is too long, she should be under Alexandra Christina, Princess of Denmark as that is the title that the Danish family's website gives her . If they still title her as a Princess of Denmark, shouldn't we?Prsgoddess187 12:31, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I would agree with Prsgoddess187 that in this case we should simply use the official name the website of the Danish monarchy gives her. I see no point in further arguments in that case, because they obviously must know best... Gryffindor [[Image:Flag of Austria (state).svg|20px]] 20:39, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Comment: Princess of Denmark is not a substantive title, as is not either Prince of the United Kingdom. Charles is under his substantive title, Prince of Wales. And Charles's little brother Edward is under HIS substantive title Earl of Wessex and not under "Edward, Prince of the United Kingdom". The naming convention here in Wikipedia is to use substantive title and not a long bunch of titles. If someone is dissatisfied to the naming convention, go propose a change of that WP policy, do not try to create here a single case of some longer titulary. 217.140.193.123 13:53, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Maybe we can agree on a compromise. As was done with The Countess of Wessex, entered at Sophie, Countess of Wessex, would it be possible to move Alexandra to Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. As Sophie's name is not in her title, neither will Alexandra's be if she ever remarries, she will be Her Excellency The Countess of Frederiksborg. I am just trying to make the entry look better, and the search for it easier for those not so familiar with the WP naming conventions.Prsgoddess187 14:41, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

I agree to naming her as Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. (I always prefer entries where a personal name is the first word, instead of any title.) The move request should be changed accordingly, if any move is to become true. 217.140.193.123 14:59, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Ummmmm. no. You are all wrong this page was correctly located at Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. This is what is correct. What it is located at now is even more incorrect than Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. This is the style of the divorcee of the Count of Frederiksborg. Which she is not. It is incorrect to have this article titled anything except for Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. What you have done is the equivalent of listing Prince Philip at Duke Philip of Edinburgh.Mac Domhnaill 22:22, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Mac Domhnaill - I don't disagree with you. I have no problem with the move back to Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg, as that is her correct title. I was just trying to keep the peace, and avoid another cheesy edit war. I don't agree with where most of the British Royal Family are located, so I think that we think the same. I originally suggested Alexandra (Christina), Princess of Denmark, Countess of Frederiksborg, as that is her title on the Danish Royal Family's website, but your suggestion is a shorter version of that.Prsgoddess187 22:34, 18 September 2005 (UTC) Sorry for the length, I am really passionate about some strange things)

 * It seems to me like most people want this page at Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg and the destination of the "requested move" above makes no sense in this context. Can we therefore vote on the new proposal, please? Deb 17:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Note
SO WHAT YOU ARE REALLY SAYING IS BECAUSE CAMILLA, HER SISTER IN LAW ,COUTESS OF DENMARK WERE NOT BLUE BLOOD. THEY DO NOT RECIEVE REAL TITLES.IS THAT THE ROYAL LAW.I LIKE IT VERY MUCH IF THAT WERE SO.EVEN CHARLES LOOSING HIS FORMER TITLE AS PRINCE,BECAUSE HE MARRIED NON-ROYAL ON HIS SECOND MARRIGE. TO A DUKE OR COUNT.THOUGH IT ALL IT SHOULD BE SO BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT FULL TO EXSTINCT ROYAL BLOOD.IT'S NOT APPROPREIATE TO CALL HIM PRINCE HE VALUE LESS, HE SHOULD GET LESS.MARRYING NON-BLUE BLOOD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO CONTIUE THE PURE LINE TO MAKE ROYAL ,IN IT ATTEMPT TO APPROIATE MEASURES OF LAW .AND MAKING AND HIGH ROYAL MONARCHY.
 * 1) user Arrigo = user 217.140.193.123 - and collecting material for writing another episode of lamest edit wars ever and/or BJAODN, which he does regularly under both names. --Francis Schonken 09:51, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

He married a non-royal on his first marriage too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.173.234.163 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

=New 2 - comments from second vote on=

Move to Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg
Please enter whether you approve, oppose or are neutral to the above move. Please remember to sign your posts.

 * Hope I did wel to start a new combined vote above? It wasn't clear to me who had approved to what with the two templates hovering over the old vote. --Francis Schonken 20:35, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

 * That's cool. I had started this section this afternoon after Deb suggested voting on the new choice, but your way is much easier.  Prsgoddess187 22:36, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Comments can be added here

 * Move, definately to Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. Mac Domhnaill 02:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Hi Mac, this is the "further comments" section, best to add your vote to the appropriate vote section under the section title on top of the page if you want it to be counted, thanks! --Francis Schonken 10:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

, countess
The official website for The Danish Monarchy spells Princess Alexandra's additonal personal title without the "c" in "countess" being capitalized ''. (Respectively without the "g" in "grevinde" being capitalized in the Danish version)''. Hence the wikipedia article Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg should be edited accordingly; Princess Alexandra, countess of Frederiksborg Vupti 15:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

 * Based on the above I do not agree with the edit by 200.89.248.22 of the c into a capital C again in Countess.
 * Should Princess Alexandra remarry and she ceases to be Princess, then I do believe the Danish Royal Court will write Countess with a capital C. However, I do not agree with the edited assumption that she will become HE The Countess. I rather believe the court write HE Countess Alexandra of Fredriksborg, like the former HH Princes of Denmark have been respectively HE Count Flemming of Rosenborg, HE Count Ingolf of Rosenborg and HE Count Christian of Rosenborg. Vupti 02:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

 * It would only make sense to write "countess" if her original title is written uncapitalized where such a title normally would be capitalized. Now, my guess is that "grevinde" is usually written that way. I might be wrong, but if the capitalization rules should be different in this specific case I'm quite certain that the press release would have explicitely said so. And if she's a "grevinde" in the ordinary way, she should be a "Countess" in the ordinary way: that is, capitalized. I don't think the "countess" on the DRC website (which I could only find in one place in the site, and so could very well be a mistype, a mistranslation, or an oversight) is to be taken as a desire that "grevinde" be translated in a specific way in this case, because, once again, the Court would have said so. (And even if it did, we would probably not let it govern the usage of English in the English Wikipedia, considering that we don't let the governments of the Czech Republic (wanting its country to be called "Czechia" in English) and East Timor (wanting its country to be called "Timor-Leste" in English) do the same.) Well, the easy way out is of course to ask the Royal Court what they mean. I might do that. -- Jao 11:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Titles
Knights of the Elephant are members of the 1st rank class. This means that during one day from her knighting to the wedding, she was offically Hendes Excellence frøken Alexandra Manley. --Klausok 08:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The woman's official name
The Danish court calls her, officially, Alexandra Christina ... is there any reason Wiki does not, either in the title of the article or in the list of titles/names she has held from birth?Mowens35 20:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, because WP Naming Conventions rule #8 call for its omission in the page name. It's length would also probably clutter a styles box, but I agree that it should be mentioned in the first paragraph or soon thereafter. Lethiere 06:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I changed the paragraph listing how what her name and title will be after marriage. The engagement announcement said that she will become "Alexandra Christina, grevinde af Frederiksborg." So, according to that announcement, she'll be Alexandra Christina, countess of Frederiksborg, using her title as a surname (rather than taking her new husband's surname). In fact, it's possible that the current Mr. Jørgensen may choose to become Martin af Frederiksborg. Ariadne55 21:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

 * Countess has a capital 'c'. Remember, we don't directly take Danish usage and apply it in English. English form is to use the capital 'C'. Presumably, this article will be relocated to Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. Charles 22:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I didn't realize that was the way the 'c'/'C' controversy had gone. Thanks for changing it. Ariadne55 07:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

re-marriage and change of page title
I am not sure what time is the marriage - but it's today, so I have changed several details, and somebody, please change the title of the page. I can't do it. Please change the details that I have missed out.--w_tanoto 10:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Just moved the page, deleting "princess" title--w_tanoto 15:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Should Alexandra be removed from the Danish Royal Family template, as she is no longer a member of the Royal Family? Prsgodd e ss187 16:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * How about a vote? I said "no" for a while, but after a week, yes. People might not be aware of the changes--w_tanoto 16:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Royal allowance
I read that she will continue to get a "royal allowance" of $330,000 per year. Is this paid for by the royal family or the Danish public? 71.237.236.45 04:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC) But then again: In Denmark, people that don't want to work, are kings. If you are above 25 years of age, you will get at least $1.600 a month (or $2.100 if you have kids) for doing nothing. On top of that, you will get a housing allowance. These amounts are for people without any insurance. If you are insured, you will get even more. No wonder, that a lot of people from poor countries wants to live in Denmark - and that a lot of hard working well educated Danes paying for all this wants to move abroad to pay less taxes.
 * It comes from the public treasury, but remember that the Folketing did vote for it. The only difference now that she's re-married is that she has to pay a hefty tax on it.  I've heard the tax is 60%, but couldn't find a reliable source; if anyone does find a good source, you might want to add a sentence about it to the article.  Ariadne55 05:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * $330,000 is still a pretty good social security payment for a single mother. Even after marrying a man 14 years younger than herself, she will still get paid $330,000 every year for the rest of her life.

Alexandra vs. Alexandra Christina
The former article was at Princess Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg, so I'm wondering if this one should be at Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg instead of Alexandra Christina. I don't really think her middle name is necessary. Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg exists as a redirect, so I thought I'd ask for opinions before I requested a move. Morhange 20:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

 * This is requested at uncontroversial moves already. I explained that the middle name was not used in the former article and that was fine, nor should it be now. You can comment there to the effect of what you've said here. Charles 01:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Move request
Alexandra Christina, Countess of Frederiksborg → Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg moved as requested on WP:RM. Think I got all the double redirects from other pages too. Bubba hotep 10:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

???????????
If she isn't Danish, how is she part of the Royal Family?

 * She is not. She became part of the familiy by marrying prince Joachim. After her marriage to another man she is no longer considered part of the family. --Klausok 06:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Dead links
I noticed several dead links in the references. I suppose it is a consequence of the second marriage. 131.254.52.17 11:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg vs. Countess Alexandra of Frederiksborg
I may be wrong, but I don't think that she is the Countess of Frederiksborg. It's more likely that she is a Countess of Frederiksborg, just like the Queen's cousin, Count Ingolf of Rosenborg, is a Count of Rosenborg. HE's personal website also refers to her as Countess Alexandra Christina of Frederiksborg. If she is indeed a Countess of Frederiksborg, then the article should be moved to Countess Alexandra of Frederiksborg. Surtsicna (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Alexandra was made Grevinde -- and not Komtesse -- "af Fredriksborg". Although both titles are translated into English as "Countess", "Komtesse" is exclusively a title shared by daughters of a Danish count (Greve) until they marry: each daughter of a Count af Rosenborg is a Komtesse af Rosenborg, and each legitimate son of a Rosenborg count is also a count, ad infinitum. But "Grevinde" may be either a marital title obtained automatically by wedding a count, or a substantive title conferred directly by the sovereign (occasionally done when Danish kings or princes married morganatically, e.g. the second wives of Christian IV and Frederick VII). Since Alexandra is the only person who can ever bear the title "Grevinde af Rosenborg" under Queen Margrethe II's grant (Alexandra's sons bear, in additional to their princely title, the hereditary title of Greve af Monpezat), it seems very likely that she is "the" Countess of Fredriksborg de jure as well as de facto. FactStraight (talk) 08:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Captivating question from Surtsicna. Maybe interesting information to add: The contact page of her personal website writes her name as: H.E. The Countess Alexandra of Frederiksborg. So with "the". http://www.frederiksborg.eu/kontakt_en.html Demophon (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of House name
I have deleted the House name as it is no longer correct.Harlay (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Monogram
The Countess' monogram in this article is outdated. Since her divorce the royal crown was replaced by a comital crown. Does someone know a free source with the current monogram? --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 21:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Husband's Title?
If Alexandra is the Countess of Frederiksborg, then why isn't her new husband the Count of Frederiksborg??? --PrincessAlice13 (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Because she was the one who was granted the title, not her husband. She holds it in her own right, not through marriage, and men have no claim to Danish titles held by their wives. The future husband of Princess Isabella of Denmark, for example, will automatically become neither prince of Denmark nor count of Monpezat. Talk about "equality" and "equal primogeniture"! Surtsicna (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141214123630/https://www.pinterest.com/pin/154670568424849160/ to https://www.pinterest.com/pin/154670568424849160/
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141214123735/https://www.pinterest.com/pin/154670568426210740/ to https://www.pinterest.com/pin/154670568426210740/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Fawning royalist drivel
Known for her fashion sense and charity work, she was dubbed the Diana of the North.

LOL! By whom? //erik.bramsen.copenhagen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.83.153.69 (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)


text:
Ntfombi of Eswatini

Ntfombi (born Ntfombi Tfwala; 27 December 1949) has been Queen Mother of Eswatini since 1986. She was also regent of Eswatini from 1983 to 1986. She is the mother of King Mswati III.

Early life and marriage
Ntfombi married King Sobhuza II of Swaziland, with whom she had a son, Prince Makhosetive Dlamini.

In 1982 King Sobhuza designated another of his wives, Queen Dzeliwe, as the Ndlovukati to reign as joint sovereign with his future successor. Instead of recognizing one of her sons as his heir apparent, he indicated to his Loqoqo that he wanted Prince Makhosetive Dlamini to succeed him on the throne. In June 1982 he also extended the authority of the Loqoqo, empowering it to act as a "Supreme Council of State", free to appoint an "Authorised Person" to exercise the royal prerogative if a regent was deemed unable to do so properly.

Regency of Queen Dzeliwe
In the power vacuum that resulted from the death of Sobhuza II, Ndlovukati Dzeliwe became Queen Regent during the minority of the designated heir to the throne, but the Loqoqo, consisting mostly of King Sobhuza's senior relatives, chiefs and advisors, usurped her authority and sacked Sobhuza's prime minister, Prince Mabandla Dlamini, whom Loqoqo members apparently feared would strip them of their new role. Once Prince Makhosetive Dlamini attained his majority and officially became king, his mother would then be expected to be designated as the new Ndlovukati. However, Queen Dzeliwe was placed under house arrest in 1983. Following a 9-day period during which Swaziland was ruled by Prince Sozisa Dlamini, Ntfombi was selected as queen regent.

OINGASIBIBA
In 1986, when he turned 18, Makhosetive was crowned King Mswati III. Upon becoming king, as was the custom, he declared his mother to be the Indlovukazi (a title roughly corresponding to queen mother, literally translated as Great She-Elephant) and, as such, joint head of state. As queen mother, Ntfombi is seen as the spiritual and national head of state, while her son is considered the administrative head of state.

The Indlovukazi's image has been widely disseminated in the West since her inclusion in Andy Warhol's portrait series during her exercise of the regency for her son, as one of four Reigning Queens, along with queens Beatrix of the Netherlands, Margrethe II of Denmark and Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Ntfombi of Eswatini


text:
Lake Louise State Park

Lake Louise State Park is a Minnesota state park just north of the Iowa border near the small town of Le Roy in Mower County, Minnesota, directly south of Rochester. It has a 25 acre man-made lake and 1168 acre of mixed prairie and deciduous forest. It is used for picnics, swimming, camping, hiking, horseback riding, and other outdoor recreation. It is noted for butterfly watching, as some rare species have been seen. It features a picnic shelter which dates to the Public Works Administration era.

History
Sometime in the late 1850s or early 1860s, Conrad Hambrecht settled in section 21 of Le Roy Township on the Upper Iowa River near the Old Village of Leroy. An earthen dam was later built on the river and Hambrecht's land sat along the small lake that was created. Hambrecht set aside this part of land for recreation and he later donated the land, then called Wildwood Park, to the city of Le Roy with the stipulation that it be used as a park. The original dam was washed away and the citizens of Le Roy rebuilt it and named the body of water "Lake Louise" for Hambrecht's sister. In 1961 local advocates arranged a visit by state park officials, who agreed that Wildwood Park could be expanded into a state park. The land was transferred to the state of Minnesota and in 1963 Lake Louise State Park was created by an act of the Minnesota Legislature. At that time it contained only the lake and 636 acre. The boundaries have been expanded since, but usage remains primarily local. A 1971 internal study recommended that the park be remanded to the county as a regional recreation area, but no such action was ever taken.

title: Lake Louise State Park


text:
Clifford group

The Clifford group encompasses a set of quantum operations that map the set of n-fold Pauli group products into itself. It is most famously studied for its use in quantum error correction.

Definition
The Pauli matrices,

 * $$\sigma_0=I=\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \quad \sigma_1=X=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \quad \sigma_2=Y=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \text{ and } \sigma_3=Z=\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}$$

provide a basis for the density operators of a single qubit, as well as for the unitaries that can be applied to them. For the $$n$$-qubit case, one can construct a group, known as the Pauli group, according to

 * $$\mathbf{P}_n=\left\{ e^{i\theta\pi/2} \sigma_{j_1} \otimes \cdots \otimes \sigma_{j_n} \mid \theta = 0,1,2,3,j_k = 0,1,2,3 \right\}.$$

The Clifford group is defined as the group of unitaries that normalize the Pauli group: $$\mathbf{C}_n=\{V\in U_{2^n}\mid V\mathbf{P}_nV^\dagger = \mathbf{P}_n\}.$$ This definition is equivalent to stating that the Clifford group consists of unitaries generated by the circuits using Hadamard, Phase, and CNOT gates. The n-qubit Clifford group $$\mathbf{C}_n$$ contains $$2^{n^2+2n+3}\prod_{j=1}^{n}(4^j-1)$$ elements.

Some authors choose to define the Clifford group as the quotient group $$\mathbf{C}_n/U(1)$$, which counts elements in $$\mathbf{C}_n$$ that differ only by an overall global phase factor as the same element. The smallest global phase is $$\frac{1+i}{\sqrt{2}}$$, the eighth complex root of the number 1, arising from the circuit identity $$HSHSHS=\frac{1+i}{\sqrt{2}}I$$, where $$H$$ is the Hadamard gate and $$S$$ is the Phase gate. For $$n=$$ 1, 2, and 3, this group contains 24, 11,520, and 92,897,280 elements, respectively. The number of elements in $$\mathbf{C}_n/U(1)$$ is $$2^{n^2+2n}\prod_{j=1}^{n}(4^j-1)$$.

A third possible definition of the Clifford group can be obtained from the above by further factoring out the Pauli group $$\{I,X,Y,Z\}$$ on each qubit. The leftover group is isomorphic to the group of $$2n\times 2n$$ symplectic matrices $Sp(2n,2)$ over the field $$\mathbb{F}_2$$ of two elements. It has $$2^{n^2}\prod_{j=1}^{n}(4^j-1)$$ elements.

Example
In the case of a single qubit, each element in the single-qubit Clifford group $$\mathbf{C}_1/U(1)$$ can be expressed as a matrix product $$\mathbf{A}\mathbf{B}$$, where $$\mathbf{A}\in\{I,H,S,HS,SH,HSH\}$$ and $$\mathbf{B}=\{I,X,Y,Z\}$$. Here $$H$$ is the Hadamard gate and $$S$$ the Phase gate.

Generating gate library
The Clifford group is generated by three gates, Hadamard, phase gate S, and CNOT.

Circuit complexity
Arbitrary Clifford group element can be generated as a circuit with no more than $$O(n^2/ \log(n))$$ gates. Here, reference reports an 11-stage decomposition -H-C-P-C-P-C-H-P-C-P-C-, where H, C, and P stand for computational stages using Hadamard, CNOT, and Phase gates, respectively, and reference shows that the CNOT stage can be implemented using $$O(n^2/ \log(n))$$ gates (stages -H- and -P- rely on the single-qubit gates and thus can be implemented using linearly many gates, which does not affect asymptotics).

Notable subgroups
The Clifford group has a rich subgroup structure often exposed by the quantum circuits generating various subgroups. The subgroups of the Clifford group $$\mathbf{C}_n$$ include:

 * n-fold Pauli product group $$\mathbf{P}_n$$. It has $$2^{2n+2}$$ elements ($$2^{2n}$$ without the global phase) and it is generated by the quantum circuits with Pauli-X and Pauli-Z gates.
 * General linear group GL$$(n,\mathbb{F}_2)$$. It has $$\prod_{j=0}^{n-1}(2^n-2^j)=2^{n^2+O(1)}$$ elements and it is generated by the circuits with the CNOT gates.
 * Symmetric group $$\mathrm{S}_n$$. It has $$n!$$ elements and it is generated by the circuits with the SWAP gates.
 * Diagonal subgroup, consisting of diagonal Clifford unitaries. It has $$2^{0.5n^2+O(n)}$$ elements and it is generated by the quantum circuits with Phase and CZ gates.
 * Hadamard-free subgroup is generated by the quantum circuits over Phase and CNOT gates. It has $$2^{1.5n^2+O(n)}$$ elements.
 * Weyl group, which is generated by the SWAP and Hadamard gates. It has $$2^{n\log(n)+O(n)}$$ elements.
 * Borel group, a maximal solvable subgroup, which is generated by the product of the lower triangular invertible Boolean matrices (CNOT circuits with controls on top qubits and targets on the bottom qubits) with diagonal subgroup elements (circuits with Phase and CZ gates). This group is a subgroup of the Hadamard-free subgroup; it has $$2^{n^2+O(n)}$$ elements.

Properties
The order of Clifford gates and Pauli gates can be interchanged. For example, this can be illustrated by considering the following operator on 2 qubits
 * $$A=(X \otimes Z)CZ $$.

We know that: $$CZ(X \otimes I)CZ^\dagger =X \otimes Z $$. If we multiply by CZ from the right
 * $$CZ(X \otimes I) =(X \otimes Z)CZ $$.

So A is equivalent to
 * $$A=(X \otimes Z)CZ = CZ(X \otimes I) $$.

Simulatability
The Gottesman–Knill theorem states that a quantum circuit using only the following elements can be simulated efficiently on a classical computer:

 * 1) Preparation of qubits in computational basis states,
 * 2) Clifford gates, and
 * 3) Measurements in the computational basis.

The Gottesman–Knill theorem shows that even some highly entangled states can be simulated efficiently. Several important types of quantum algorithms use only Clifford gates, most importantly the standard algorithms for entanglement distillation and for quantum error correction.

title: Clifford group


text:
User talk:Janemba13

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Zzyzx11 | Talk 01:24, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Wikipedia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 21:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Brandon melillo
A tag has been placed on Brandon melillo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Booglamay (talk) 21:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you add defamatory content once again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Janemba13


text: Category:Gemini Award winners

title: Category:Gemini Award winners


text:
User talk:Hansamurai

Welcome!

Chrono Trigger Characters
Would Epoch be considered a CT character? Sure, it's not living, but the party members get attached to it, and the game hints that the Epoch has a "personality". If you agree, can you go ahead and add the template? (I can do it if you're busy or somethin). Peaceman 04:36, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

user:69.50.187.91
Thanks for reporting the linkspammer bot 69.50.187.91. He is now blocked and his edits reverted. Thue | talk 13:12, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

The bible
SimonP (the creator of the 100 or so gospel verse articles) has tried to claim that the votes for the "only notable verses" section would include most of the 30,000 verses of the bible because he sees them as notable. To avoid such a POV twisting of the votes, I have added a new section - - for voting on whether the number of notable verses is more like 30,000, or more like 30. Would you care to vote there as well? 00:28, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

VFD
Hi, you voted to keep Authentic Matthew because you said that the article was noteworthy. The topic is "what was the original form of matthew", which I agree is noteworthy, but is already discussed at Q Gospel, synoptic problem, markan priority, two source hypothesis, AND Gospel of Matthew.

What actually exists at Authentic Matthew is the claim that the original version of the gospel of Matthew is the Gospel of the Hebrews, which is also claimed to be the same as Gospel of the Nazarenes, and Gospel of the Ebionites.

This claim is supported by no-one outside the article's creator, and is a thesis badly strung together from misuse of parts of the aforementioned articles. None of the article's references support it (they support the aforementioined articles). The claim that the Gospel of the Hebrews is the same as the Gospel of the Nazarenes, and Gospel of the Ebionites, is near universally regarded, by academics, and non-academics, as wrong, based on an error Jerome made because he didn't have enough access to these sources. This article is entirely the original research of the author of it, and although the title exists elsewhere, the content exists nowhere else whatsoever.

Is it possible for you to re-contemplate your vote? 08:08, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Wow, you really wanna get stuff deleted don't you. hansamurai 飯侍 (burp) 13:15, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

 * Only when its original research, POV pushing, strings together unrelated scholarly theories, and misuses quotes from Church Fathers, presents itself as the truth, and ends with a statement that the vast majority position (the one that is near universal) is only held by "some" people and is "obviously wrong anyway", and is protected by an army of sockpuppets stemming from a single user, who has edits to one article alone, i.e. that one.     19:38, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Packaging art
Thanks for your comment! I'm currently part of WikiProject Final Fantasy and we've started including Packaging art sections for all of the Final Fantasy articles, so I decided to do the same for Chrono Trigger and Chrono Cross. — Warpedmirror 18:21, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

hiya Han
Welcome to the WP:WPWI! Any assistance you can lend will be greatly appreciated. :-) Tomer TALK 03:06, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Onimusha 3 box art
I was going to delete your Image:Oni3box.jpg, since the one at the Onimusha 3 article (which I uploaded a while ago) is the same as yours and a bit bigger. You mind if I do? Thunderbrand 19:12, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Go ahead, I uploaded the first one on accident before remember/realizing the other article already had a picture. hansamurai 飯侍 (burp) 19:14, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

hi, I'm new user
Hi, I'm Tantalas, working on the Italian Wikipedia on Magus (Chrono Trigger) article. I translated a big part of the english article, wich was absolutely good:), but I don't know if I can upload Magus's images on the italian Wikipedia... can you help me please? You can find me just going in the Italian Wikipedia, then serching for Magus'discussion and clicking on the Tantalas link. By

Image Tagging Image:12,000 B.C. Chrono Trigger.png
Thanks for uploading Image:12,000 B.C. Chrono Trigger.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 18:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kingdom of Zeal Chrono Trigger.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Kingdom of Zeal Chrono Trigger.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 18:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Lavos3.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Lavos3.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 01:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:1999 A.D. Chrono Trigger.png
Thanks for uploading Image:1999 A.D. Chrono Trigger.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 01:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:2300 A.D. Chrono Trigger.png
Thanks for uploading Image:2300 A.D. Chrono Trigger.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 01:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:600 A.D. Chrono Trigger.png
Thanks for uploading Image:600 A.D. Chrono Trigger.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 01:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:65,000,000 B.C. Chrono Trigger.png
Thanks for uploading Image:65,000,000 B.C. Chrono Trigger.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 01:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ayla in chrono trigger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ayla in chrono trigger.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 03:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Magus in chrono trigger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Magus in chrono trigger.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 02:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Crono_in_chrono_trigger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Crono_in_chrono_trigger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cyrus CT.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cyrus CT.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vic Vip e r 14:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Frog_in_Chrono_Trigger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Frog_in_Chrono_Trigger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Lucca_in_chrono_trigger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lucca_in_chrono_trigger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Marle_in_Chrono_Trigger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Marle_in_Chrono_Trigger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Regina Spektor
Thanks for your comment at Talk:Regina Spektor, we really appreciate your input with this sort of thing. It's really help if you stayed involved, there aren't many opinions on this article and it needs more input! Thanks, HawkerTyphoon 23:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:BuckyBadger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BuckyBadger.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. YellowDot 16:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Warnerpark.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Warnerpark.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Schala in chrono trigger.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Schala in chrono trigger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hifi revival.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hifi revival.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Live volume one.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Live volume one.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Loud and clear.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Loud and clear.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:FleaCT.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FleaCT.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:End of Time Chrono Trigger.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:End of Time Chrono Trigger.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SlashCT.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SlashCT.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Melchior in chrono trigger.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Melchior in chrono trigger.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ozzie.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ozzie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Adventures of oc supertones.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adventures of oc supertones.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SlashCT.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:SlashCT.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Chase the sun.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chase the sun.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Onitactics.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Onitactics.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nan oha A's Yu ri    Talk, My master 02:39, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Edgewood college seal.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Edgewood college seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Area codes 715 and 534

The article Area codes 715 and 534 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unreferenced for more than one decade"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 18:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hansamurai


text:
User talk:Brightwinds

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Zzyzx11 | Talk 01:26, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TCN Coalition Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:TCN Coalition Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: TCN Coalition (June 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TCN Coalition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TCN Coalition, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TCN_Coalition Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TCN_Coalition reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: TCN Coalition (July 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TCN Coalition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TCN Coalition, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TCN_Coalition Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TCN_Coalition reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:TCN Coalition

Hello, Brightwinds. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TCN Coalition".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brightwinds


text:
User talk:Arbales~enwiki

FDR
As I stated (in greate length) at Talk:Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the new version lost WAY too much information/links, was at a bad title, and should have been edited in-place. Niteowlneils 01:26, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WebKitEVAddressBar.png
Thank you for uploading File:WebKitEVAddressBar.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:18, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Arbales. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Arbales~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 10:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arbales~enwiki


text:
Raikov

Raikov is a Russian surname.
 * Dmitry Raikov, mathematician
 * Yevgeny Tikhonovich Raikov, opera singer
 * Boris Yevgenyevich Raikov, biologist

title: Raikov


text:
Irig, Serbia

Irig (Ириг, ; Ürög) is a town and municipality located in the Srem District of the autonomous province of Vojvodina, Serbia. The town has a population of 4,415, while Irig municipality has 10,866 inhabitants.

Name
In Serbian, the town is known as Irig (Ириг), in Croatian as Irig, in Hungarian as Ireg or Ürög, in German as Irick, in Slovak as Irig, and in Rusyn as Ириґ.

History
Irig was first mentioned in the historical documents in 1225. In the 15th century, the masters of the town were Serbian despots Vuk Grgurević, Đorđe Branković, and Jovan Branković. During the 15th and 16th century, ten Orthodox monasteries were built in the surrounding of Irig (Two of those were located just near the town).

Between 1526 and 1699, the town was under Ottoman administration. During this time, it belonged to the Sanjak of Syrmia, and was the administrative seat of one of the seven nahijas in that sanjak. In 1665, the town had 2,000 houses, one mosque and two monasteries. In this time, Irig was mostly inhabited by Muslim population.

Since 1699, Irig was part of the Habsburg monarchy. In the 18th century, Irig was one of the most important market centers in Srem and most of its inhabitants were Serbs.

In 1795–1796, the population of the town was decimated by plague. Popular local story claims that the patient zero was Anđelija Kuzmanović. She attended her sister's funeral in the village of Krnješevci near Stara Pazova, and brought back with her the plague infested rug to Irig, thus inadvertently spreading the disease. Kuzmanović died from plague on 14 June 1795. Historically, the plague was brought to Zemun by the Ottoman merchants and soldiers in the spring of 1795. Frightened citizens escaped to their relatives on Fruška Gora, spreading the disease.

Austrian authorities didn't try to heal the diseased, except for providing some painkiller medications, as their main goal was to isolate Irig and the surrounding villages as denizens of Irig also fled into the mountain. Punishment for the breaking out of the military imposed quarantine was death. After four months the residents returned only to find the scorched town: out of 912 houses, Austrian authorities burned or demolished 402. From the total population of 4,813, 2,548 died of this disease. It took over 120 years for Irig to reach the 1795 population. In appreciation for establishing the strict border between two towns and preventing the spreading of the plague into the nearby Ruma, citizens of Ruma built the memorial on the location of this "border crossing", made from 800 bricks taken from the demolished houses in Irig, which still stands. Built in 1797 and named "Kipovi" ("Statues"), the monument is protected as the cultural monument.

In the late 19th and early 20th century, Irig was a district capital in the Syrmia County of the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia.

According to the 1900 census, the population of the Irig municipality numbered 22,313 inhabitants, of whom 16,893 were Orthodox Serbs, while the town of Irig itself had 5,196 inhabitants, of whom 3,936 were Orthodox Serbs. According to the 1910 census, the population of the Irig municipality numbered 25,320 inhabitants, of whom 18,331 spoke Serbian, 3,552 Hungarian, 1,816 Croatian, and 1,031 German.

Since 1918, Irig was part of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (later renamed to Kingdom of Yugoslavia) and subsequent South Slavic and Serb states. During World War II, 417 inhabitants of the town were executed by German fascists.

Characteristics
Located on the southern slopes of Fruška Gora, Irig has a specific microclimate which provides excellent conditions for viticulture.

In the area surrounding Irig, there are 8 monasteries surviving today, built in the 15th and 16th century: Velika Remeta, Krušedol, Staro Hopovo, Mala Remeta, Novo Hopovo, Jazak, Grgeteg and Vrdnik.

Serbian reading-room (Srpska čitaonica) is the oldest Serbian library in Vojvodina. It was founded in 1842 by Dimitrije Krestić, archimandrite of the Krušedol monastery. Originally it was located in three rooms of the local school (two were reading-rooms, one was library). Today it is situated in the Culture House, with 45,000 books, numerous painting, documents and photographs. The library contained first edition of works of Dositej Obradović, oldest editions of the Letopis Matice srpske, etc.

From the earliest days, both local and foreign newspapers (from Belgrade, Serbia, Pest, Croatia, Germany, etc.) could be read in it. During World War II, German soldiers and officers used the library as their quarters. Before their withdrawal, they blew up the building which then burned to the ground. The inhabitants rebuilt it themselves. Over 500 old books were donated by the citizens. The first theatrical shows in Irig were played in 1905.

Inhabited places
Irig municipality includes the town of Irig and the following villages:

 * Velika Remeta
 * Vrdnik
 * Grgeteg
 * Dobrodol
 * Jazak
 * Krušedol Prnjavor
 * Krušedol Selo
 * Mala Remeta
 * Neradin
 * Rivica
 * Šatrinci

Demographics
According to the 2011 census results, the municipality of Irig has 10,866 inhabitants.

Ethnic groups
The total population of the Irig municipality is 10,866, which includes:
 * Serbs = 8,534 (78.54%)
 * Hungarians = 762 (7.01%)
 * Croats = 232 (2.14%)
 * Roma = 166 (1.53%)
 * Others and undeclared = 1,172 (10.79%)

Most of the local communities are ethnically Serb, while two have a Hungarian majority: Šatrinci (Hungarian: Satrinca) and Dobrodol (Hungarian: Dobradópuszta).

Economy
The following table gives a preview of total number of registered people employed in legal entities per their core activity (as of 2018):

Twin cities

 * Topolčani, North Macedonia

Other sources

 * Dr Željko Vučković - Stevan Pištević, Povesnica Kulturno-umetničkog društva "Zmaj" u Irigu 1905–2005, Irig, 2005.
 * Ladislav Varga, Mozaik žitelja iriških, Novi Sad, 2001.

title: Irig, Serbia


text:
Universal Indicator (collective)

Universal Indicator is the group name for Rephlex Records artists, Richard D. James (as Martin Tressider ) and Mike Dred (a.k.a. The Kosmik Kommando). The name is a reference to the signature acid techno sound found on all the releases. Five projects were released, and a compilation CD was mixed by Dred.

All the albums are named after different colours used on the UI spectrum. They were released in the following order: Blue, Red, Yellow, and Green. Blue and Yellow were produced by Dred, while Red and Green are often attributed to James, though never officially.

title: Universal Indicator (collective)


text:
Talk:Ansnorveldt, Ontario

Resources
Information sources that may be used to improve the article:

 * Government of Ontario - Ministry of Natural Resources: Natural Areas Report: ANSNORVELDT WETLAND COMPLEX
 * Cawthra Mulock Nature Reserve
 * Marsh Tour

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Ansnorveldt, Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081028171823/http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/topo/map/ to http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/topo/map/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ansnorveldt, Ontario


text:
User talk:Radell

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Zzyzx11 | Talk 01:29, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of People pill

The article People pill has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Pure original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 21:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Radell


text:
Imperial Japanese Navy land forces

The Imperial Japanese Navy land forces were a variety of land-based units of the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) organized for offensive operations, the defense of Japanese naval and shore-based facilities, military policing tasks, construction and engineering, training, and shore-based anti-aircraft roles; both overseas, and in the Japanese home islands. Units from ranged from dedicated military police formations, to ad-hoc groups of naval personnel pressed into service as naval infantry, to professional marines, among others. The land forces were most active during the interwar period and World War II, with IJN land forces complementing, supporting, and in some cases, operating in-place of Imperial Japanese Army units. Upon Imperial Japan’s defeat in WWII, IJN land forces were disbanded alongside the IJN proper in 1945.

Units
The Imperial Japanese Navy’s land forces consisted of the following units:
 * Naval Landing Force or 海軍陸戦隊 Kaigun-rikusen-tai; also referred to as naval shore parties. These were ad hoc units formed from ship's crews for temporary use ashore as naval infantry.
 * Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces (SNLF) or 海軍特別陸戦隊 Kaigun-tokubetsu-rikusen-tai: the Imperial Japanese Navy's professional marines. Units were typically battalion-sized and formed at the naval corps-level for both offensive and defensive operations. There was also three Special Naval Landing Forces paratroop units (although only two would participate in operational airborne jumps), which were composed of SNLF marines who received jump training from the Imperial Japanese Army at Kantō Plain. The SNLF were entirely under the control of the Imperial Japanese Navy as opposed to an independent or quasi-independent military branch such as the United States Marine Corps or the United Kingdom's Royal Marines, respectively, and should not be confused with the Imperial Japanese Marine Corps which briefly existed between 1871 and 1876.
 * Shanghai Special Naval Landing Force or 上海海軍特別陸戦隊 Shanghai-kaigun-tokubetsu-rikusen-tai: the sole permanent Special Naval Landing Force, established in Shanghai following the January 28th Incident in 1932. The unit had an authorized strength of approximately 2000 men and was organized into a brigade made up of several battalions and smaller special weapons units.
 * Combined Special Naval Landing Force or 連合特別陸戦隊 Rengō-tokubetsu-rikusen-tai: a headquarters unit which combined several Special Naval Landing Force units into a brigade sized unit with greater firepower.
 * Base Force or 根拠地隊 Konkyochi-tai and The Special Base Force or 特別根拠地隊 Tokubetsu-konkyochi-tai provided a variety of services both administrative and tactical in areas outside Japan proper, Korea, and Formosa. The Japanese raised around fifty of these units which ranged in size from 250 to 1500 men depending on location and function. The Base Force could also include afloat units.
 * Defense Units or 防備隊 Bōbi-tai: units of from 250 to 2000 men organized for defense of naval installations and areas of strategic importance within Japan. Some Defense Units included artillery emplacements and some controlled the minefields in Japanese waters.
 * Guard Units or 警備隊 Keibi-tai: 100 to 1500 men units responsible for ground defense of Imperial Japanese Navy facilities. They were frequently assigned to Base Forces and Special Base Forces. The Japanese raised around one hundred of these units. Many of these units played a notable part in the defense of Japanese held islands during the later stages of the war, such as the Iwo Jima Keibi-tai consisting of 1000 men led by Captain Samaji Inouye.
 * Anti-Aircraft Defense Units or 防空隊 Bōkū-tai: Anti-aircraft artillery units of 200–350 men. There were three types which differed based on the number and kind of anti-aircraft weapons assigned. Type A includes AA artillery and machine guns, Type B machine guns only, and Type C machine guns and machine-cannon. The Japanese formed over two hundred of these units which were primarily located in areas outside Japan, Formosa, and Korea. They were usually assigned to Base Forces, Special Base Forces, Special Naval Landing Forces, and Guard Forces.
 * Construction Battalions or 設営隊 Setsuei-tai built and repaired naval facilities of all kinds, including airstrips, barracks, ammunition bunkers, and fuel depots on remote islands as well as Japan's major naval bases. Most personnel were civilian employees and unarmed. The units also included naval engineers overseeing the operations and sailors guarding the unit, both being lightly armed for defense. The Construction Battalions often made use of local labor whose service was compulsory.
 * Communications Units or 通信隊 Tsūshin-tai of 100–2,000 men were stationed ashore to provide communications between Japan's widespread naval installations and to and from the fleets and ships at sea.
 * Tokkeitai or 特警隊 Navy military police units carried out ordinary military police functions in naval installations and occupied territories; they also worked with the Imperial Japanese Army's Kempeitai military police, the Keishi-chō civil police and Tokkō secret units on matters concerning security, intelligence collection, and counter-intelligence.
 * Anti-Aircraft Artillery Batteries or 高射砲中隊 Koshaho Chutai were units of forty or fifty men organized for the air defense of important installations and were subordinate to Air Defense Sectors which in turn were subordinate to Defense Units. These batteries were separate from the previously mentioned Bobitai. Several hundred of them were in existence at the end of the war.
 * Naval Corps or 海兵団 Kaiheidan were units in each of the four naval districts (Yokosuka, Kure, Sasebo and Maizuru) that were responsible for training of enlisted and non-commissioned officer personnel for the navy.

title: Imperial Japanese Navy land forces


text:
User talk:AkCapr

Welcome and White powder
Hi, Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for contributing!

You almost had the image link right, but you uploaded Wppowder.JPG but tried to link Wppowder.jpg. Mediawiki is case sensitive.

The White powder article was nominated for deletion, but thats nothing to be offended about. You need to leave the tag on the page until the voting process is completed. This takes about five days. The best way to keep the article in the wikipedia is to continue adding good material to it. For example, there is some question about who 'Alex Kutyavin' is.. so perhaps you should provide some cited sources, or remove that part :). Also, you should go vote to keep the article by following the VFD link, and include a brief statement as to why the subject is encyclopedic and deserves an article of its own.

It might be useful to check out these resources:

 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

If you have any questions, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.

When writing on a talk page, you should sign your coments with --~ which is expanded to your signature, like this: --Gmaxwell 01:30, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:AkCapr