text:
User talk:212.251.37.246

January 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. John Reaves 11:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Glen 09:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Turlo Lomon 09:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. -SpuriousQ (talk) 11:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

This IP address was recently used to vandalize. If vandalism continues from this address it will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If this IP address is shared between multiple users, then your edits may be unrelated to this vandalism. To avoid being included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans, we invite you to create a user account of your own. Sander123 10:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 04:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.  — O cat ecir  Talk  09:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Odysseus, you will be blocked from editing. --Akhilleus (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Morenooso 15:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sean Hurley, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sean Hurley was changed by 212.251.37.246 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-20T10:01:45+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Bingham, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Bingham was changed by 212.251.37.246 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-14T09:35:03+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Johnson. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Andrew Johnson was changed by 212.251.37.246 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-14T09:38:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  Cala braxthis  (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.  Cala braxthis  (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Dreadstar †  09:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Skin cancer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bullzeye contribs 12:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Skin cancer. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bullzeye contribs 12:18, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Skin cancer. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Bullzeye contribs 12:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Breast cancer. Bullzeye contribs 12:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Neurosurgery. Alansohn (talk) 12:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page FL Studio has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 14:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 09:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dentistry, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dentistry was changed by 212.251.37.246 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-02-09T12:49:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Whitechapel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Template:Whitechapel was changed by 212.251.37.246 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-03-22T08:04:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Muscular system, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Muscular system was changed by 212.251.37.246 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-26T11:52:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stratford, Ontario. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stratford, Ontario was changed by 212.251.37.246 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-04-26T12:10:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Stratford, Ontario. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Stratford, Ontario. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Favonian (talk) 12:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:212.251.37.246


text:
Hall Place

Hall Place is a stately home in the London Borough of Bexley in south-east London, built in 1537 for Sir John Champneys, a wealthy merchant and former Lord Mayor of London. The house was extended in 1649 by Sir Robert Austen, a merchant from Tenterden in Kent. The house is a Grade I listed building and Scheduled Ancient Monument, and surrounded by a 65-hectare award-winning garden. It is situated on the A223, Bourne Road, south of Watling Street (A207) and north of the Black Prince interchange of the A2 dual carriageway and two lesser roads.

16th and 17th century
Building started on Hall Place in 1537 for wealthy merchant Sir John Champneys, Lord Mayor of the City of London. Building materials included stone recycled from a nearby former monastery, Lesnes Abbey. Sir John's house consisted of a splendid central Great Hall crossed at one end by a service wing and at the other by high status family accommodation including a parlour and great chamber. The outer walls are a distinctive checkerboard pattern made of flint and rubble, a beautiful example of the masonry style popular in the late 15th and 16th century.

In 1649, the house was sold to another wealthy City merchant, Sir Robert Austen (1587–1666), who added a second wing built of red bricks, doubling the size of the house. Little attempt was made to harmonise the two halves, which were built in highly contrasting architectural styles. Austen was created 1st Baronet, of Hall Place in Bexley, on 10 July 1660 and briefly held the office of High Sheriff of Kent.

18th and 19th century
The house remained in the Austen family until the mid 18th century when Robert Austen died and the estate was purchased by a distant relative Sir Francis Dashwood. Sir Francis Dashwood was a politician and Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1762 to 1763, but he was also a known rake and founder of the secret and immoral Hellfire Club. Hall Place was one of a number of properties owned and managed by the Dashwood family, whose principal home was West Wycombe Park in Buckinghamshire. From 1795 Hall Place was leased as a school for young gentlemen.

It was Maitland Dashwood, grandson of Sir Francis, who made the next set of significant changes to the fabric of Hall Place beginning in the 1870s. Maitland and his architect Robert William Edis added the lodge, linked the house to the water mains and altered the interior by adding much of the fine wood panelling and parquet flooring. These improvements were made to prepare the house for lease.

The 19th and early 20th century saw a series of short-term leases to the aristocratic and the fashionable. The tenants during this period reflected a new glamorous pre-war elite and included Baron Emile D’Erlanger and his American wife Matilda, a former Gaiety girl.

The last tenant of Hall Place was Lady Limerick who lived here alone from 1917 – 1943, she added a number of mock-Tudor features including beams and fireplaces. Lady Limerick and the house appeared in a 1922 edition of County Life Magazine.

Second World War
In January 1944 the U.S Army's Signal Corps 6811th Signal Service Detachment arrived at Hall Place to operate an intercept station, code named Santa Fe. This Y Station was set up in a new spirit of co-operation between British and American intelligence services.

The Signal Corps were to participate in the Enigma code breaking operation, Ultra. The Santa Fe Y station intercepted encoded Morse signals mostly from the German Air Force and the Luftwaffe. Radio aerial wires were strung over the rooftops and the Tudor Kitchen and Great Hall were converted into ‘set rooms’ with banks of Hallicrafters radio receivers lined up on wood-plank tables. The Great Parlour became the soldier's dormitory.

Post-war Hall Place was used as an annex to the local technical school for girls. From 1968 to 1995 the building was used as the headquarters of Bexley's Libraries and Museums service.

Hall Place and gardens today
Today Hall Place is restored to its original Tudor and later 17th-century designs. The property is managed by the charity Bexley Heritage Trust.

In June 2005 Bexley Heritage Trust received a £2 million grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund to develop and improve the site for the benefit of visitors. This grant enabled the construction of the Riverside Cafe alongside the River Cray, a new visitor centre and an education suite. A 17th-century stable block was also converted into an art gallery, which displays works by local artists. The house itself is used as an exhibition space.

Gardens

The Hall Place estate includes 65 hectares of landscaped gardens and grounds, a topiary lawn, herb garden, tropical garden and long herbaceous cottage garden-styled borders.

The gardens at Hall Place were first opened to the public in 1952 by the Duchess of Kent. The famous topiary at Hall Place, the Queen's Beasts, were planted in 1953 in celebration of the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II.

The former walled gardens include a tropical butterfly house and owl sanctuary. Specimen trees in the grounds include an Indian Bean Tree (Catalpa bignonioides), a Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), and a Black Poplar (Populus nigra) – planted to commemorate the Queen's Diamond Jubilee in 2012 by the local Mayor and the Deputy Lieutenant of Bexley.

The site achieved a Green Flag Award for excellence in a public park or garden for 20 consecutive years 1996–2016, in recognition of the high standard of maintenance and cultivation at the site.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Hall Place


text:
Five Tibetan Rites

The Five Tibetan Rites is a system of exercises first publicized by Peter Kelder in a 1939 booklet titled The Eye of Revelation. The system is also referred to as "The Five Rites", "The Five Tibetans" and "The Five Rites of Rejuvenation". Kelder described the rites as having the potential to restore youthfulness through changing one's internal "vortexes". There is no evidence of the rites' being authentic Tibetan practices. Instead, they emerge from the Western esoteric tradition, with inspiration from hatha yoga. The rites have been reprinted in multiple expanded editions and translations, and have been popular among New Age practitioners.

Origins
Kelder claimed that the rites were more than 2,500 years old, but this is apocryphal. Some of the movements have similarities to Tibetan trul khor (yantra yoga), but they do not integrate breath with the movement, which is fundamental to yantra yoga. Tibetans have not recognized the rites as being authentic Tibetan practices. John Michael Greer, a writer on occult topics, described the rites as inspired by Indian spiritual practices but of American origin. Greer writes that the dietary advice in the booklet is similar to the contemporary Hay diet, and that the second, third, fourth, and fifth rites seem similar to hatha yoga as described by American books published in the early 1900s as part of the physical culture movement, which was influenced by German-American gymnastics clubs. Greer also draws a connection between the first rite and the American spiritualist movement.

Historical context
Kelder published the first version of The Eye of Revelation in 1939 and an expanded edition in 1946, using a small publishing company in Los Angeles that published booklets related to occult topics. This followed a period of Western interest in Tibet as a source of ancient wisdom. In 1924, William Montgomery McGovern, billed as the first American in Tibet, published To Lhasa in Disguise, a Secret Expedition through Mysterious Tibet. Three years later, American anthropologist Walter Evans-Wentz published an English translation of The Tibetan Book of the Dead.

The English translation of French explorer Alexandra David-Néel's memoir With Mystics and Magicians in Tibet was published in 1931. In it, she describes learning a Tibetan yoga practice from a lama. Evans-Wentz published Tibetan Yoga and Secret Doctrines in 1935. Starting in 1938, the American "White Lama" Theos Casimir Bernard's lectures and publications "established a firm link between the physical culture of Indian hatha yoga and the spiritual mysticism associated in the minds of many with the ritual practices of Tibetan Buddhism."

The 1933 novel Lost Horizon and its 1937 film adaptation featured a fictional remote Tibetan monastery, Shangri-La, where people stay youthful into old age. In The Eye of Revelation, Kelder claimed to have met a retired British army colonel who shared with him stories of travel to a remote Tibetan monastery and subsequent discovery of the rites and their youthful effect.

Revival
The original 1939 version of The Eye of Revelation was reprinted by the Borderland Sciences Research Foundation in 1975, and the book was republished in an expanded edition in 1985 as Ancient Secret of the Fountain of Youth. The 1988 bestseller Modern Magick by Donald Michael Kraig included a description of the rites. By the early 1990s, versions of Kelder's book were sold in stores alongside other New Age topics.

Chris Kilham, whose 1994 book The Five Tibetans contributed to the popularity of the exercises, is an example of practitioners who do not insist on a literal interpretation of Kelder's story. He wrote: "Whether or not the Five Tibetans are in fact Tibetan in origin is something we may never ascertain...[t]he issue at hand, though, is not the lineage of the Five Tibetans. The point is their immense potential value for those who will clear 10 minutes a day to practice."

Kelder's work has been republished and expanded several more times. It has been translated into more than a dozen languages. The first German edition was published in 1989, and it was on a bestseller list there for years.

Story
In The Eye of Revelation, Kelder claims that, while stationed in India, British army officer Colonel Bradford (a pseudonym) heard a story about a group of lamas who had apparently discovered a "Fountain of Youth". Local people told him about old men who became healthy, strong, and full of "vigor and virility" after entering a particular lamasery. After retiring, Kelder's Colonel Bradford went on to discover the lamasery and lived there with the lamas, who taught him five exercises, which they called "rites". According to the booklet, the lamas described seven spinning "psychic vortexes" within the body: "two...in the brain; one at the base of the throat, another in the right side of the body in the region of the liver; one in the sexual center; and one in each knee." The booklet says that as a person grows older, the spin rate of the "vortexes" diminishes, resulting in "ill-health", but the spin rate of these "vortexes" can be restored by performing the Five Rites daily, resulting in improved health.

Performing the rites
In the original The Eye of Revelation booklet, Kelder suggests to "stand erect with hands on hips between the Five Rites and take one or two deep breaths". He neither implies nor suggests that specific breathing patterns should be adopted while performing the movements. Expanded publications from Five Tibetans teachers recommend and detail specific instructions for breathing while performing the exercises. Practitioners also recommend taking caution before performing the rites due to the possibility of their causing dizziness, aggravating certain health conditions, or overstraining the body. For example, one teacher suggested warming up first, going slowly, and keeping the head and neck in alignment, while another suggested consulting a yoga instructor before trying the rites.

In The Eye of Revelation, Kelder claims that Mevlevi Order dervishes spin clockwise – hence the direction of the first rite – but they actually spin counter-clockwise.

Effects
Kelder wrote that Bradford became dramatically younger in appearance after spending time at the lamasery and engaging in the rites. A 1998 edition of Ancient Secret of the Fountain of Youth, published by Doubleday, presents testimonials about improved eyesight, restoration of color to gray hair, and anti-aging. However, that edition begins with a disclaimer that includes, "The exercises, dietary measures, and other advice regarding health matters outlined in this book are not suitable for everyone, and under certain circumstances they could lead to injury." In the early 1990s, the rites were referenced by fraudulent mailings that claimed to offer secrets of youth to seniors.

Some teachers and practitioners consider the rites' benefits to be similar to other yoga practices, such as reducing stress and improving well-being.

title: Five Tibetan Rites


text:
Warhammer 40,000: Chaos Gate

Warhammer 40,000: Chaos Gate is a video game set in the gothic science fiction backdrop of the Games Workshop game system Warhammer 40,000. In it, players take command of a number of squads of Ultramarines to do battle with their ancient enemies the Word Bearers Traitor Marines, Chaos Demons, and their commander the Chaos Lord Zymran. A sequel, Warhammer 40,000: Chaos Gate - Daemonhunters, was released in 2022.

Gameplay
The game is turn-based and takes part on a gridded playing screen. Each turn an Ultramarine can take a certain number of actions up to its Action Points limit. Actions include moving, firing a weapon or throwing a grenade. The Chaos AI then takes its turn in the same way. Ultramarine players command a number of squads, vehicles and characters from the Space Marines Codex.

Chaos Gate features an experience system, where Space Marines gain experience and can improve their statistics as they participate in missions.

Each Space Marine can be assigned to a general-purpose Tactical Squad or to one of three specialist formations: Assault, Devastator and Terminator Squads. Additional weaponry can be picked up from weapon crates found in the campaign maps.

Development
The game uses a modified version of the Soldiers at War engine. It was originally released for Windows 95 and Windows 98 but has since been made compatible for modern versions of Windows as well. Chaos Gate was developed by Random Games and originally published by Strategic Simulations. In its release by Hasbro Games, Chaos Gate was bundled with Final Liberation: Warhammer Epic 40,000, set in Games Workshop's Epic 40,000 game system that pitted the forces of Humanity against marauding Orks. In 2015, GOG Ltd republished the game digitally.

Reception
Richie Shoemaker of PC Zone called Chaos Gate a title that "slowly grabs hold of you and keeps you entertained throughout its duration; something you'll look back on with fond memories rather than foul".

Chaos Gate was a finalist for Computer Gaming World's 1998 "Best Strategy" award, which ultimately went to StarCraft. The editors called Chaos Gate "perhaps the best iteration of the WarHammer universe to date, although some weak AI hampered its turn-based squad-level combat".

Reviews

 * The Duelist #36

Sequel
A reboot, titled Warhammer 40,000: Chaos Gate - Daemonhunters, was released in 2022. The game was developed by Canadian studio Complex Games and published by Frontier Foundry.

title: Warhammer 40,000: Chaos Gate


text:
Kemsing railway station

Kemsing railway station serves Kemsing in Kent, England, although the station is located on the other side of the M26 motorway to the village. It is 26 mi down the line from London Victoria. Train services are provided by Southeastern.

History
Kemsing station opened on 1 June 1874, as part of the Maidstone Line from Swanley to Maidstone The goods yard had six sidings, one of which served a goods shed. Freight facilities were withdrawn on 31 October 1960. The signal box closed on 30 September 1964.

The station has been unstaffed since 8 February 1985. The station buildings were demolished after the station became unstaffed. A PERTIS 'permit to travel' machine, located outside the station at road level on the 'up' side, suffices.

Facilities
Kemsing station is unstaffed although there is a self-service ticket machine available for ticket purchases. Both platforms have shelters, information screens and modern help points.

There is a small car park at the station entrance and local buses to Sevenoaks stop a short distance away from Kemsing, Noah's Ark.

Services
All services at Kemsing are operated by Southeastern using and  EMUs.

The typical off-peak service in trains per hour is:

 * 1 tph to London Victoria
 * 1 tph to Ashford International

There is no Sunday service at Kemsing, although trains do call on bank holidays.

title: Kemsing railway station


text: Category:Sport in Norfolk

title: Category:Sport in Norfolk


text:
User talk:Kvnramesh

I am a structural engineer from India, but I am working as a software analyst. I find wikipedia very interesting. I would enjoy contributing to its improvement.

Welcome and India related links
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Please use edit summaries and Show preview button more often. Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 17:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Shanti Swarup

The article Shanti Swarup has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 10:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Madhunapantula Suryanarayana Murty

The article Madhunapantula Suryanarayana Murty has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Appears to fail wp:prof. citations and other professional claims do not rise to the level of passing C1, and I see no other claim to notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ray Talk 03:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dredging Corporation of India

A tag has been placed on Dredging Corporation of India, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SwisterTwister  talk  04:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaraama Dravidulu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaraama Dravidulu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aaraama Dravidulu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 10:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kvnramesh


text:
F-shape barrier

The F-shape barrier is a concrete crash barrier, originally designed to divide lanes of traffic on a highway. It is a modification of the widely used Jersey barrier design, and is generally considered safer.

A parametric study, one that systematically varies the parameters, was done through computer simulations of barrier profiles labeled A through F. The result showed that the one labeled F performed better than even the shape of the Jersey barrier. A series of full-scale crash tests later confirmed these computer-based results. What is known today as the F-shape barrier takes its name from these tests and not from any part of the shape of the barrier, unlike, for example, T-walls.

In spite of these tests, the F-shape barrier has not supplanted the Jersey-shape. The Jersey-shape barrier was already in wide use, and it also met the crash-test criteria. The states' contractors already had a significant investment in the Jersey-shape casting forms and it would cost them money to change the profiles of the forms.

The F-shape and the Jersey-shape have the same slopes, but the distance from the ground to the slope break point of the F-shape is 255 mm, which is 75 mm lower than the Jersey-shape. This lower slope break point reduces vehicle lift, improving the barrier's performance.

Because the Jersey-shape design requires very little modification to become an F-shape design, asphalt resurfacing, because it raises the overall height of the road surface relative to the barrier, can convert the Jersey-shape barrier into a more F-shape-like barrier that is safer for lighter cars. However, these increased layers of asphalt also reduce the working height of the barrier which reduces its effectiveness for heavier vehicles.

The UK equivalent is the concrete step barrier.

title: F-shape barrier


text:
Borough Green & Wrotham railway station

Borough Green & Wrotham railway station is located in Borough Green in Kent, England. It is 29 mi down the line from London Victoria. Train services are provided by Southeastern.

History
Wrotham station opened on 1 June 1874, as part of the Maidstone Line from Swanley to Maidstone. The station was initially named after Wrotham, which lies 1 mile to the north. The station was later renamed Wrotham & Borough Green, and then Borough Green & Wrotham as Borough Green grew in size relative to Wrotham. The goods yard had three sidings. One of them served a goods shed, another extended northwards to serve a Ragstone quarry. A 5-ton capacity crane was provided. Freight facilities were withdrawn on 9 September 1968. East of the station, there was a private siding at Platt, and a public siding at Offham. This closed on 6 September 1961.

In Spring 2008, the concrete footbridge spanning the tracks to link the platforms was condemned and replaced by a new bridge immediately to the west.

The ticket office in the 'down side' station building is staffed for part of the day. At other times, a passenger-operated ticket machine, installed in the mid-2000s at the station entrance, suffices.

Services
All services at Borough Green & Wrotham are operated by Southeastern using and  EMUs.

The typical off-peak service in trains per hour is:
 * 1 tph to London Victoria
 * 1 tph to London Charing Cross
 * 1 tph to Maidstone East (calls at West Malling only)
 * 1 tph to Ashford International (all stations)

During the peak hours, the station is served by an additional hourly service between London Victoria and Ashford International.

On Sundays, the services between London Charing Cross and Maidstone East do not run.

title: Borough Green & Wrotham railway station


text: Category:Sport in Somerset

title: Category:Sport in Somerset


text:
Talk:Text

Definition of Text
Whoever gave the linguistic definition of text, is wrong, he has mistaken text for language. Your differenciation between "a system as the ability of the speakers to communicate using verbal and gestural signs" and "text being understood as the product of this ability" is more fitting for the language-definition as separated into "langue" and "parole" (french) like deSaussure did.

--212.201.75.219 13:23, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) hello

Lit-crit usage of "text"?
Which of the many articles linked from this disambiguation page would be best to use as the link for the word "text" in the article paratext? I'm not an academic, and I have only the vaguest understanding of what "text" means in the context of literary criticism and cultural studies. It would be useful if Wikipedia had an article on that definition of "text". Perhaps it does, but I couldn't determine immediately from the page text which one would be helpful to me or a hypothetical reader coming from that standpoint. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. I'm leaning towards linking to hermeneutics, as that is at least the right context, but that's not precisely accurate: as I understand it, hermeneutics is the study of texts in this sense.  It would be useful if we had an article on what a "text" is in this context. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

This issue is not just about litterary theory and criticism, it's general for a wide variety of humanities traditions outside of linguistics. There is clearly a need for an article on text as used in these traditions (text as derived from greek textere = fabric on to modern structuralist and post-structuralist traditions etc). --Anderssl (talk) 13:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Text


text: Category:User chr

title: Category:User chr