text:
User talk:Matharvest

Welcome to the Wikipedia
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library

For more information click  here . You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.

(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 22:05, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Purest Feeling
Thank you very much for doing all that work on the Purest Feeling article. My copy of the album and of When The Whip Comes Down are currently on lend to someone at work, although I doubt I would have gone to as much effort as you have with adding all that info' and the sidebar. Perhaps you could do the same for When The Whip Comes Down? I'll be able to if you can't. Could I be cheeky and ask you to take a look at the Happiness In Slavery article? Many, many thanks again. --Aaron Jethro
 * Hey,nice work on the WTWCD bootleg. I think the name of it comes from the fact that there's a B-side of that name by The Rolling Stones. I remember that Trent says something about how this is a chance for him to say 'fuck' on pay-per-view, but I couldn't write about it until I get my CD back.

Your message
Sarcasm is unhelpful. In your terms, your edits "wasted" a huge amount of my time, because I'd already tidied the articles into Wikipedia style, both in obvious Manual-of-Style ways and in terms of turning the idiosyncratic typography of album sleeves into proper English.

I'm currently looking at an album by Wayne Shorter, for which I made an article last night. It has his name and the album title, and the track titles, in all capitals — on the front and back and liner notes. That's just the publisher's style, though (as it is for many books, magazines, films, etc.); when giving the title we don't use all capitals; we use the Wikipedia (and normal English) naming conventions.

Note also the way to link "Japanese" and "album", and the Wikipedia policy that punctuation goes outside inverted commas unless it's part of what's being quoted. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 08:15, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I'm not sure what "legally in capitals" means; legality isn't the issue, but normal English style and the Wikipedia MoS. The naming conventions don't mention not using all capitals because that's a general point, not limited to naming articles (see, for example, the article on All caps, which points out: "All caps [...] commonly appears in titles on book covers, on advertising billboards, and in dramatic newspaper headlines. It is not widely used in body copy.").  It's important to remember that this is an encyclopædia, and follows different principles of style from those followed by fan sites, music journalism, etc. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 08:51, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Gerogerigegege.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gerogerigegege.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Prince.eye.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Prince.eye.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 20:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Nine Lives of Fritz the Cat
Sorry! Reverting your edit was a mistake. I think I've been on RC Patrol too long tonight. Anyway, many apologies. —PaperTruths 04:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Follow-up: I think I've fixed the damage, but you might want to take a peek and make sure. Once again, very sorry! (It's unfortunate the way that edit looked through a vandal filter.)  —PaperTruths 04:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Out of Print?
The Malice Mizer album, Voyage sans Retour, is available on CDJapan—I'm pretty sure that CDJapan doesn't sell bootlegs. Are you sure that the album is out of print? --Berserk798 23:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Furry

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gacktcrescent.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gacktcrescent.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gacktmoon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gacktmoon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dothack GU logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dothack GU logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Soporlachambre.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Soporlachambre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Soporlachambrebox.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Soporlachambrebox.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Soporlachambrevinyl.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Soporlachambrevinyl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhatTimeIsIt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WhatTimeIsIt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:REAL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:REAL.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RobotRock.DaftPunk.single.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RobotRock.DaftPunk.single.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SMILE-L'arc-.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SMILE-L'arc-.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sopordls faceone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sopordls faceone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sopordls faceone2004.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sopordls faceone2004.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DreamFactory.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DreamFactory.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Prince.eye.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Prince.eye.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The_Secret_of_NIMH.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The_Secret_of_NIMH.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Project FMF (talk) 23:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ratz_Rapido_Razmo.jpg
I have tagged Image:Ratz_Rapido_Razmo.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ratz_thecrew.jpg
I have tagged Image:Ratz_thecrew.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 17:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Analoguebubblebath2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Analoguebubblebath2.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Analoguebubblebath3point1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Analoguebubblebath3point1.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AphexTwinClassics.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AphexTwinClassics.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Pikasso_I.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pikasso_I.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 15:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NINPurestFeeling.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:NINPurestFeeling.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NINWhenTheWhipComesDown.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:NINWhenTheWhipComesDown.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Stylised typography
The issue with title and crossing out their name isn't often an issue on Wikipedia, but when it is, it falls under the umbrella of stylised typography. Generally, the title should be written in proper English, so there are no TITLES IN CAPS, or MiXeD Cap$ or $ymBoLs for that matter. The page you have linked also has a heated discussion on its talk page, with no consensus yet reached on how the title should be handled, so please do not reference the page for your changes to the Maximum the Hormone page. I have brought up the issue with both pages at the talk page for WP:ALBUMS if you would like to see what responses will be made. --Jacob Talk 19:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dothack hack logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dothack hack logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Wumpscut
I reverted your deletion of labels and release formats form the main article simply the reason that not all the releases have individual articles and you're saying that info belongs there. First off, where does it say that label and format info HAS to go into release articles in the first place? Secondly, some underground bands that have individual album articles are getting hit with notability tags - they aren't widely known and it's an argument to justify them having separate articles for their releases in the first place. Sooner or later, since Wumpscut is not mainstream - the articles will probably be hit by notability tags and deleted eventually. I don't see a problem with containing that information in one list on the band's article. Yeah it may look sloppy, but it may help collectors find their stuff and it's all in one place, not scattered around 500 separate articles that don't cover everything in the first place. Cyberia23 (talk) 06:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anna-Varney.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Anna-Varney.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

July 2009
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting it into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. I've requested Riceboy Sleeps be speedily deleted so that the album article can be redirected properly. JD554 (talk) 06:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Anna-Varney.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Anna-Varney.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dothack fragment.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dothack fragment.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gacktseventhnight.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Gacktseventhnight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:ExpertKnobTwiddlers.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ExpertKnobTwiddlers.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:BT - This Binary Universe album cover.jpg)
You've uploaded File:BT - This Binary Universe album cover.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dependent and Happy, Matharvest!

Wikipedia editor Legoktm just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The article looked fine, just wanted to let you know that the image was missing, and shows as a redlink. LegoKontribsTalkM 07:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Legoktm's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dependent and Happy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vasco and Maasai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vasco (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shackleton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DependentAndHappypartone.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:DependentAndHappypartone.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DependentAndHappyparttwo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:DependentAndHappyparttwo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DependentAndHappypartthree.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:DependentAndHappypartthree.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DependentAndHappypartfour.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:DependentAndHappypartfour.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Skinhead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panther (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Song Across Wires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Pie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1992–2002, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batman & Robin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1992–2012 The Anthology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunshine (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kin (Pat Metheny album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Global village (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=598410819 your edit] to All the Pretty Little Horses may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All the Pretty Little Horses TheInmostLightItself is an album by English band Current 93. It forms the

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drukqs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prepared music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...
Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 00:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=619156022 your edit] to Ryuichi Sakamoto may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

 * Greed (Swans album)
 * added a link pointing to Young God

 * Holy Money
 * added a link pointing to Young God

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Insidious: Chapter 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insidious. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:TheGoldenCommunion.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:TheGoldenCommunion.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zerotoleranceforsilence.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Zerotoleranceforsilence.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

File:BT ima 2CD.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BT ima 2CD.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Arca - KicK iii.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Arca - KicK iii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pat Metheny Group Essential Collection.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pat Metheny Group Essential Collection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Analoguebubblebath3point1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Analoguebubblebath3point1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

April 2024: Do not add unsourced genres
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Gamma (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.  Ss  112   06:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Matharvest


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zindroski Memorial Indoor Baseball Stadium

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy delete. —Korath (Talk) 01:18, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Zindroski Memorial Indoor Baseball Stadium
patent nonsense. Delete with extreme prejudice. Lupin 22:07, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, let's not waste time. Gazpacho 22:35, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonsense. I've also listed the images on the ifd page.  RickK 23:41, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - patent nonsense. Firebug 01:15, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonsense. Megan1967 06:41, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
C12

C12, C.XII or C-12 may be:
 * LNER Class C12, a class of British 4-4-2T locomotives
 * C12 Workmen's Compensation (Agriculture) Convention, 1921
 * C-12 Huron, a logistics support aircraft of the U.S. Military (military versions of the Beechcraft Super King Air)
 * C-12 Vega, an early transport of the United States Army Air Corps
 * Albatros C.XII, a World War I German military reconnaissance aircraft
 * Autovia C-12, a highway in Catalonia, Spain
 * Cierva C.12, a 1927 British experimental autogyro
 * HMS C12, a British C-class submarine of the Royal Navy
 * JNR Class C12, a class of Japanese steam locomotive
 * Sauber C12, a 1993 racing car
 * Spyker C12 Zagato, a 2007 Dutch car
 * USS Columbia (C-12), a light cruiser of the United States Navy
 * C-12: Final Resistance, a video game for PlayStation
 * Caldwell 12 (NGC 6945, the Fireworks Galaxy), an intermediate spiral galaxy in the constellations Cepheus and Cygnus
 * The 12th century
 * Carbon-12, the most abundant stable isotope of carbon
 * Malignant neoplasm of piriform sinus ICD-10 code
 * Bill C-12 in Canadian law

title: C12


text:
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Petaholmes

Petaholmes
final (31/0/0) ending 22:08 13 April 2005 (UTC)

Very good user. He made many articles about agriculture and biology. He made about 6100 edits since October 2004. I believe, that he will be a good admin. -- Darwinek 22:08, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * Candidate please indicate acceptance of the nomination here
 * I accept, also I am a she :)--nixie 01:19, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) Sure -- Darwinek 22:08, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Consistently level-headed in my experience. —Korath (Talk) 01:51, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Geoff/Gsl 03:19, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) M e r o v i n g i a n  (t) (c) 04:00, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) utcursch | talk 06:49, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Valuable addition to the WikiTeam. Radiant_* 09:47, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Cool. JuntungWu 11:50, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Sjakkalle 12:02, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC).
 * 9) Sure. - RedWordSmith 15:26, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Mild support. Support for of all the work, mild because all edits should have summary. Pavel Vozenilek 18:57, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) I've come across this user and have seen nothing but good work. Support. Mgm|(talk) 19:21, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. Zzyzx11 02:08, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 13) Support --AYArktos 02:27, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 14) Support, good work on science and biographies.-gadfium 04:18, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 15) Absolutely. Ambi 07:11, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 16) Support one of those "I thought she ALREADY WAS an admin" votes.   ALKIVAR ™ 07:32, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 17) Support. She's a knowledgeable and careful editor, and will make a good admin. SlimVirgin (talk) 11:02, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * 18) Thumbs up from me too. Grutness|hello? [[Image:Grutness.jpg|25px|]] 12:35, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 19) Aye. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 22:15, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * 20) Support - She one of those "I can't believe she's not an admins". She would made an excellent addition to the admin ranks. – ClockworkSoul 13:55, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 21) Support - Her articles are well written and her edits are right no the mark. She would be a great addition to the admin ranks. DavidMendoza 22:07, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 22) Support. Kingturtle 05:35, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 23) Enthusiastic support Tuf-Kat 06:35, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * 24) Support. Cyberjunkie 07:01, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 25) Support. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:23, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 26) Support. Looking through her contributions I see high-quality work, and I think she'd be a good admin too. Antandrus 17:00, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 27) Everyking 22:38, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 28) Obviously not evil, I support. --Bjarki 00:17, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 29) Support. User and talk pages show us an editor who communicates well and works well with others. Jonathunder 02:47, 2005 Apr 12 (UTC)
 * 30) PedanticallySpeaking 17:08, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * 31) Support. --Lst27 ( t a l k )  21:47, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments
 * According to the List of Wikipedians by number of edits about 3100 of my edits are in the main namespace--nixie 01:19, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * That list is a month old, so you're selling yourself a bit short. Your current count is 3729. —Korath (Talk) 01:51, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * I am curious about your edit - why did you asses the event so important? Pavel Vozenilek 02:37, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * The Candle demonstration in Bratislava article was an orphan, this was one place I could find to internally link the article and it seemed relevant given that it is an important event in the history of Slovakia and that it occured in Bratislava, I also added the event to the chronological History of Bratislava. If I was incorrect in my judgement be bold and remove the link.--nixie 02:48, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * The change was reverted immediatelly, it was event of rather low relevancy. Pavel Vozenilek 18:57, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A. Clearing up the (sometimes backlogged) copyright violations, page moves, and speedy deletions.
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. I think that I did A good job cleaning up Plant breeding from a poorly tranlated article to one that discusses the topic in a way that is easy to follow for a non-biologist. I'm also pleased with the current versions of golden rice, polymer banknotes, Lost City (hydrothermal field), Agriculture in Australia and desert locust to list a few of my contributions. I like it when I write something and other people help to make it better.
 * I have been working through the orphan pages, creating internal links, merging and nominating for deletion where necesary, I revert vandalism where I see it, and I have participated in a number of wiki synax projects and the image tagging project. These janitorial type of edits are often just as rewarding as a nice article, because they make Wikipedia a better organised place.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
 * A. The areas I edit seem to be generally uncontentious. I have recently run into a few anonymous users that repeatedly create new articles from large chunks of coprighted text, geneticist biographies of all things, and when the copyvio notice goes up repost, or insert the information at a different version of the persons name. I have asked them to stop, but where they have been especially persistent, if I was an admin I would be able to block such disruptive behaviour if it was necessary. Unless asked, it would be out of character of me to throw myself into a POV edit war situation.


text: User talk:85.100.14.232

title: User talk:85.100.14.232


text:
Salisbury, Dominica

Salisbury is a town on the west coast of the small Caribbean island nation of Dominica. It is located at 15.43583°N, -61.43694°W and is a part of the country's St. Joseph administrative division. Its population is 2,129.

The Creole name for the town is Barroui (pronounced as "bah-wee"; also spelled Baroui or Bawi. During English colonization and the increasing Anglicizing of the nation that occurred during the 1900s, Salisbury became an equally accepted name. For the first half of the 20th century, the town was little more than a small village of thatched-roof huts along the shore, with the only significant building being the local Catholic Church (constructed 1929). During the 1950s and 1960s, however, the banana industry began to use the town as a port where bananas could be transferred from feeder roads into the island's interior to "banana boats" exporting the nation's produce. In recent years, the community, which was heavily dependent on agriculture, remains a significant contributor towards agricultural development on the island. After private land was put up for sale, the town snapped it up and grew to the north.

On August 29, 1976, the Dominican premier, Patrick Roland John, introduced the idea of independence to the nation. There, he signed the Salisbury Declaration: a document citing the intentions of what was then an island colony of Britain to become an independent state.

The first elected parliamentary representative to serve in the community was Bryson Louis, who won the 1975 general election on a Labour Party ticket. Prior to that, Clarence Louis was appointed by Edward Oliver LeBlanc to serve as a nominated member of parliament. In the 1980 general election, Dennison John, on a Freedom Party ticket, received the mandate. Following this term, James Royer was elected in 1985. During the 1990 election, Earl Williams was elected parliamentary representative, running for the United Workers' Party. Hector John is the village's current parliamentary representative.

title: Salisbury, Dominica


text:
Footage

In filmmaking and video production, footage is raw, unedited material as originally filmed by a movie camera or recorded by a (often special) video camera, which typically must be edited to create a motion picture, video clip, television show or similar completed work.

Footage may also refer to sequences used in film and video editing, such as special effects and archive material (for special cases of this, see stock footage and B roll).

Since the term originates in film, footage is only used for recorded images, such as film stock, videotapes or digitized clips – on live television, the signals from video cameras are instead called sources.

History
The origin of the term "footage" comes from early 35 mm silent film, which is traditionally measured in feet and frames; the fact that film was measured by length in cutting rooms, and that there are 16 frames (4-perf film format) in a foot of 35 mm film which roughly represented 1 second of screen time (frame rate) in some early silent films, made footage a natural unit of measure for film. The term then became used figuratively to describe moving image material of any kind.

Film footage
Sometimes film projects will also sell or trade footage, usually second unit material not used in the final cut. For example, the end of the non-director's cut version of Blade Runner used landscape views that were originally shot for The Shining before the script was modified after shooting had finished.

Television footage
Television footage, especially news footage, is often traded between television networks, but good footage usually commands a high price. The actual sum depends on duration, age, size of intended audience, duration of licensing and other factors.

Amateur video footage
Amateur footage is the low-budget hobbyist art of film practised for passion and enjoyment and not for business purposes. Amateur video footage of current events, for instance from camcorders, smart phones or closed-circuit television, can also often fetch a high price on the market – scenes shot inside the World Trade Center during the September 11, 2001 attacks were reportedly sold for US$45,000.

Stock footage
Stock footage is film or video footage that can be used again in other films. Stock footage is beneficial to filmmakers as it saves shooting new material. A single piece of stock footage is called a "stock shot" or a "library shot". Stock footage may have appeared in previous productions but may also be outtakes or footage shot for previous productions and not used. Examples of stock footage that might be utilized are moving images of cities and landmarks, wildlife in their natural environments, and historical footage. Suppliers of stock footage may be either rights managed or royalty-free. Many websites offer direct downloads of clips in various formats.

Footage brokers
A footage broker is an agent who deals in footage by promoting it to footage purchasers or producers, while taking a profit in the sales transaction.

title: Footage


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Education

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 02:43, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Libertarian Education
Tagged as since 07:54, 17 Mar 2005 UTC. Zzyzx11 22:10, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, extremely short/no context. I would have speedied it but I hoped it might be expanded by the author. Gazpacho 22:34, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, no content at this time, and no prospect of enough to make a full article. Libertarian theories on education should be included in the main article on libertarianism.
 * Speedy delete. Oxymoron. 198.82.71.55 00:46, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Ascaris suum

Ascaris suum, also known as the large roundworm of pig, is a parasitic nematode that causes ascariasis in pigs. While roundworms in pigs and humans are today considered as two species (A. suum and A. lumbricoides) with different hosts, cross-infection between humans and pigs is possible; some researchers have thus argued they are the same species. Ascariasis is associated with contact to pigs and pig manure in Denmark.

A. suum is distributed worldwide and grows up to 40 cm in length. Ascaris infections are treated with ascaricides. A. suum is in the family Ascarididae, and is one of the oldest associations to mankind.

Life cycle
Pigs get infected with A. suum by ingesting infectious parasite eggs that are present in the environment. The larvae of Ascaris complete two moults within the egg; therefore, the larvae emerging from the egg is not a second-stage larva (L2) as was previously presumed, but rather a third stage larva (L3) covered by a loosened L2 cuticle. The larvae hatch from the egg inside the pig's intestines and subsequently start their migration through the body. First, they penetrate the intestinal wall at caecum/colon and use the mesenterial blood veins to migrate to the liver. After burrowing their way through the liver tissue, they again use the efferent blood stream to carry them to the lungs. There, they get stuck in the capillaries surrounding the lungs and they penetrate the lung alveoli. It takes approximately 7 days to reach the lungs. Once the larvae are inside the lung, they migrate up the respiratory tree and are eventually coughed up and swallowed by the host to reach the small intestine again as soon as 10 days after infection. There, the larvae undergo their first molt inside the host to reach the L4 stage by day 14 post-infection. Around day 25 post infection, they develop into the L5 stage. Worms reach adulthood 6 weeks after infection, and when both female and male worms are present in the same host, fertilized eggs are produced and secreted by the female worm. These eggs are then excreted together with the faeces. After an incubation period, infective stage larvae develop in the eggs and are ready to cause infection in a new host.

Paratenic hosts ingest the eggs and the L3 larvae remain in the tissues of the paratenic host until a pig eats them. These may include beetles and earthworms, as well as large to jumbo chicken eggs from at-risk fowl.

Epidemiology
Ascaris eggs can remain infective for years in the soil, even in a temperate climate. The migration of A. suum larvae through the lungs may cause secondary bacterial infections and result in acute respiratory symptoms in pigs.

Morphology
Males are about 15 - 31 cm long, and 2 - 4 mm wide. The posterior end is curved toward the ventral side with a pointed tail. They have simple spicules that measure 2.0 - 3.5 mm long. Females are larger than males, measuring 20 - 49 cm long and 3 - 6 mm in diameter. From the anterior end, the vulva occupies about one-third of the body length. In addition to their large size, these species also have the three prominent lips. Each lip contains a dentigerous ridge, and no interlabia or alae. Females can lay up to 200,000 eggs per day, and their uteri can contain up to 27 million eggs at a time. Fertilized eggs are ovoid, ranging from 45 to 75 μm length and 35 to 50 μm in diameter. The uterine wall contributes to the lumpy and thick outer layer of the egg. The mammillated layer is stained golden-brown by the host's bile when the eggs are passed in faeces. Females can also deposit unfertilized eggs that are narrower and longer than normal fertilized eggs, ranging from 88 to 94 μm in length, and 44 μm diameter. Only the proteinaceous layer can be seen in unfertilized eggs, because after fertilization, the vitelline, chitinous, and lipid layers form.

Incidents and outbreaks
In Canada in 1970, a postgraduate student tainted his roommates' food with A. suum. Four of the victims became seriously ill; two of these suffered acute respiratory failure.

Genetics
A 273-megabase draft genome for A. suum was published in 2011.

title: Ascaris suum


text:
Aerated water

Aerated water is, correctly speaking, water to which air is added.

The term is, however, frequently applied to carbonated water.

Purpose of aeration
Sulfur compounds dissolved in water are not necessarily dangerous, but can give the water a bad taste or foul smell. These compounds can be removed in several ways, the most effective being by exposure to chlorine gas. However, aeration can also be effective if the amount of sulfur in the water is relatively low.

During aeration, water is pumped into a non-pressurized tank and agitated. This physically removes many of the sulfur compounds, which are then vented. Exposure to oxygen in the air also oxidizes some of the compounds, creating atomic sulfur which can be filtered from the water.

Aeration is also an effective means of removing radon from water.

Small tanks and ponds for keeping aquatic animals such as fish or lobsters often rely on aeration to maintain sufficient level of oxygenation in the water. This can be achieved by pumping air into the water, allowing it to bubble to the surface; or by a fountain jet agitating the water. Both these methods create an agitated, large amount of surface area between the water and the air, thus allowing transfer of gases.

Wave action on the shores of large bodies of water can provide aeration of the water in the vicinity, thus providing enhanced oxygenation which can benefit various aquatic lifeforms.

title: Aerated water


text:
Tom Westman

Thomas "Tom" Westman (born January 4, 1964) is an American firefighter and television personality best known as the winner of the tenth season of the American reality show Survivor, Survivor: Palau.

Palau
At the beginning of the game, Westman was not immediately targeted. It was revealed later in the show that when the game began with all 20 castaways on the same island, Westman was in an early alliance with Ian Rosenberger, Katie Gallagher and Stephenie LaGrossa. However, when it came time to pick tribes, LaGrossa ended up on Ulong, whereas Westman, Rosenberger, and Gallagher all ended up on Koror. This three-way alliance stayed strong on Koror. Originally planning to hide behind the younger males of his tribe, Westman soon became known for leadership skills. Koror won every single tribal immunity challenge; but in Episode Five, both tribes faced Tribal Council regardless of the challenge outcome, and Westman joined the rest of his tribe to vote out Willard Smith.

As Ulong's numbers dwindled until only LaGrossa remained, she joined Koror in Episode Nine in an unofficial merge. Together with LaGrossa, Westman's alliance controlled the game and voted out Coby Archa. At the Final Eight, Westman's allies Gregg Carey and Jennifer Lyon decided to vote out LaGrossa, despite Westman's campaigning for her. But Janu Tornell unexpectedly quit the game at Tribal Council after LaGrossa broke down once. At the next Tribal Council, LaGrossa tried to organize an alliance of women against Westman, but Caryn Groedel would not commit and informed him of the plan, leading to LaGrossa being unanimously voted out.

At the Final Three, heavy arguments took place, especially between Rosenberger and Westman. Rosenberger felt as if he had betrayed his friends, and protested that he did not come to play the role of the villain. In the endurance immunity challenge, after close to 12 hours, Rosenberger agreed to step down and be voted off in a sign of repentance for betraying Westman and Gallagher. Westman accepted and Rosenberger was voted out. This immunity win was Westman's fifth out of only seven individual immunity challenges, matching the record for individual immunity wins set by Colby Donaldson (Survivor: The Australian Outback), and since matched only by Terry Deitz (Survivor: Panama), Ozzy Lusth (Survivor: Cook Islands), Mike Holloway (Survivor: Worlds Apart), and Brad Culpepper (Survivor: Game Changers).

In the end, Westman defeated Gallagher in a 6–1 vote to become the Sole Survivor. He managed to gain the votes of everyone on the jury except Archa.

Heroes vs. Villains
In the show's 20th season, Westman participated on the Heroes tribe. He had discovered several chickens on Day One, which all of his tribe was able to surround and catch. At the beginning of the game, he made an alliance with Colby Donaldson and fellow Palau contestant Stephenie LaGrossa. The tribe beat the Villains at the first reward challenge, but lost at immunity. On Day Three, Westman and the rest of the tribe voted out Jessica "Sugar" Kiper because of her emotions and her weakness. After going to Tribal Council a second time, he was one of only three people who attempted to vote out Amanda Kimmel, but failed to do so when LaGrossa was voted out. He later found the hidden immunity idol at the Heroes campsite and thus got a target on his back. At the fourth Tribal Council (third for the Heroes), he played the idol which negated three votes cast against him, sending Cirie Fields home instead. After James Clement had injured his leg at the following reward challenge, Westman attempted to ensure the elimination of Clement. After losing their fourth immunity challenge, Westman again attempted to vote out Kimmel, however the Heroes tribe elected to keep her and Clement over Westman, and he was voted out 5–2.

Reception
Westman played Survivor for a combined total of 53 days. In 2011, he was officially inducted into the Xfinity "Survivor Hall of Fame," alongside Cook Islands castaway Ozzy Lusth and Panama contestant Cirie Fields.

In a 2015 interview, host Jeff Probst declared Westman to be one of his top ten favorite Survivor winners ever, and one of his top six favorite male winners.

Personal life
A New York City firefighter for twenty years, Westman retired from Ladder Company 108 in 2005 and transitioned to working in the insurance industry. He used the money he won to and focus on motivational speaking and charity. He has a deaf daughter.

title: Tom Westman


text:
737

737 most commonly refers to:

 * Boeing 737, an American narrow-body passenger airplane
 * Boeing 737 Classic
 * Boeing 737 MAX
 * Boeing 737 Next Generation
 * AD 737, a year in the common era
 * 737 BC, a year
 * 737 (number), a number

737 may also refer to:

Literature

 * Minuscule 737, a Greek minuscule manuscript

Television

 * Pinoy Big Brother: 737, a twelfth season of Pinoy Big Brother
 * "Seven Thirty-Seven", a season 2 episode of Breaking Bad

Places

 * 737 area code, a telephone area code in Austin, Texas, United States
 * 737 Park Avenue, a residential building in New York City, New York, United States
 * 737 Vancouver Street, a Victorian-style home in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Military

 * 737 Naval Air Squadron, a Royal Navy helicopter squadron
 * 737th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron, a provisional United States Air Force unit
 * USS Kentucky (SSBN-737), an Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine

Science and technology

 * 737 Arequipa, a minor planet
 * ABT-737, a small molecule drug
 * Code page 737, a Greek language code page

Automobiles

 * Enranger 737, a Chinese compact MPV
 * Mazda 737C, a Japanese prototype racing car

Train types

 * 737 series (JR Hokkaido), a Japanese train type operated by Hokkaido Railway Company (JR Hokkaido)

Canada

 * Saskatchewan Highway 737

Costa Rica

 * National Route 737 (Costa Rica), a highway in Alajuela

United States

 * Louisiana Highway 737
 * Pennsylvania Route 737
 * Farm to Market Road 737, two different former roads in Texas

title: 737


text:
Yuri Levada

Yuri Alexandrovich Levada (Ю́рий Алекса́ндрович Лева́да; 24 April 1930 – 16 November 2006) was a well known Russian sociologist, political scientist and the founder of the Levada Center.

Scientific activity to 1988
In 1952 Levada graduated from the Philosophical faculty of the Moscow State University. He got a PhD in philosophy in 1966 with a dissertation on the sociological problems of religion.

From 1956 to 1988 Levada worked at the Russian Academy of Sciences (Russian: АН СССР). He was the first Russian professor to ever lecture sociology and did so at the faculty of journalism of the Moscow State University.

During the political thaw under Nikita Khrushchev, Levada was allowed to carry out limited surveys of public opinion. In one lecture, Levada had asserted that tanks could not change ideologies, a reference to the Soviet Union's 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia. He also criticized, that few actually read Pravda's long editorials, and Pravda quickly and bitterly denounced the sociologist.

In 1969 Levada was deprived of his rank as a professor for ideological errors in his lectures. The “Institute of concrete social researches” (Russian: Институт конкретных социальных исследований), where Levada was responsible for the Theory and Methodology sector had to undergo a total political cleaning. In 1972 the institute was closed down during a Leonid Brezhnev-era purge of some 200 sociologists from research institutes and universities.

Levada started a new job at the Central Economic Mathematical Institute (Russian: Центральный экономико-математический институт). He started a methodological seminar which united supporters of many different scientific areas and was for a long time considered a semi-legal institution. In 1988 the core of employees of his former sector at Russian Academy of Sciences and members of his seminar helped him to set up the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM).

In 2003 Levada together with all other employees left VCIOM due to internal problems and continued their work at the Levada Center.

Levada was voted Person of the year in 2004 by the “Analitika” («Аналитика») on the website Rambler.ru.

On 16 November 2006 Yuri Levada died and was buried in the Troyekurovskoye Cemetery.

Work at VCIOM
From 1988 to 1992 Levada was the head of department for theoretical researches at VCIOM, under the direction of Tatyana Zaslavskaya. In 1992 to 2003 he was the director of VCIOM.

In 1994 he became the Chief Editor of the magazine «Social and economic changes: public opinion monitoring» (Russian: «Социальные и экономические перемены: мониторинг общественного мнения»). Since 1991 VTSIOM has published a series of researches on the presidential elections in Russia, elections of the State Duma and elections of legislative and executive powers of different regions of the country.

In the spring of 1993 the research program «Monitoring of economic and social changes» (Russian: «Мониторинг экономических и социальных перемен») developed under the direction of T.I. Zaslavskoj, was started. This program was based on regular sociological researches (six mass polls within the population per year). It provided material for the analysis of long-term numbers of sociological data about the relation of all levels of population within Russia to changes in the basic areas of social and economic life of a society.

In August 2003 the Russian Ministry for Property Relations decided to replace VCIOMs directors with government officials which allowed individuals and government structures to have control over the work of the Centre. In return all employees of VCIOM quit their jobs and continued their researches under a new name — "VCIOM-A". After the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation banned this name, the organisation was renamed into the Levada Analytical Center (Levada Center).

Levada Center
Since March 2004 the company has continued their work under the new name — the Analytical Center of Yuriy Levada ("Levada-centre"; Russian: Аналитический Центр Юрия Левады). It is carrying out public opinion - and research polls in such fields as sociology, economy, psychology, and marketing. The Levada-centre continues the research programs that were launched by its collective between 1990 and 2000. It annually publishes a year-book called "Russian Public Opinion" in Russian and English. The content of this year-book has been used for several publications in various mass-media.

title: Yuri Levada


text:
Atlantic–Congo languages

The Atlantic–Congo languages comprise the largest demonstrated family of languages in Africa. They have characteristic noun class systems and form the core of the Niger–Congo family hypothesis. They comprise all of Niger–Congo apart from Mande, Dogon, Ijoid, Siamou, Kru, the Katla and Rashad languages (previously classified as Kordofanian), and perhaps some or all of the Ubangian languages. Hans Gunther Mukanovsky's "Western Nigritic" corresponded roughly to modern Atlantic–Congo.

In the infobox, the languages which appear to be the most divergent are placed at the top. The Atlantic branch is defined in the narrow sense, while the former Atlantic branches Mel and the isolates Sua, Gola and Limba, are split out as primary branches; they are mentioned next to each other because there is no published evidence to move them; Volta–Congo is intact apart from Senufo and Kru.

In addition, Güldemann (2018) lists Nalu and Rio Nunez as unclassified languages within Niger-Congo.

There are a few poorly attested languages, such as Bayot and Bung, which may prove to be additional branches.

Comparative vocabulary
Sample basic vocabulary for reconstructed proto-languages of different Atlantic-Congo branches:

title: Atlantic–Congo languages


text:
Trace Gallagher

Tracy G. Gallagher is an American journalist and the anchor of Fox News @ Night, Fox News' late-night news program.

Background
Gallagher grew up in the ski resort town of Mammoth Lakes, California where he was the quarterback for the Mammoth Huskies high school football team. He graduated from high school in 1979. Gallagher studied at the University of San Diego and he majored in business playing quarterback for the Torero football team. Trace scored a 1600 on the SAT college entrance exam in 1979, as he mentioned on his or another Fox News cable TV show during the first week in April 2024.

Fox News
Based in Los Angeles, Gallagher served as a co-anchor (with Martha MacCallum) of The Live Desk and as a substitute anchor for Studio B with Shepard Smith and Fox Report. During his time at Fox, Gallagher has reported on the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster and the 2004 Southeast Asian tsunami. Gallagher has also served as a general assignment correspondent.

He has worked at Fox's Chicago, San Francisco, and New York City news bureaus. Previously Gallagher worked at WCPX (now WKMG) in Orlando, KVBC (now KSNV) in Las Vegas, and KTVB in Boise.

On February 1, 2010, The Live Desk was replaced with America Live with Megyn Kelly. Gallagher continues to anchor and report on Fox programs.

On September 21, 2022, he was named permanent host of Fox News @ Night, replacing founding host Shannon Bream after she was named host of Fox News Sunday. He has been hosting the program since October 3, 2022.

title: Trace Gallagher


text:
Sparke

Sparke is a surname. Notable people with the surname include:

 * Arthur Sparke, lawyer and politician
 * Bowyer Sparke, bishop
 * Edward Sparke, clergyman
 * John Sparke (died 1566) English MP for Plympton Erle
 * John Sparke (died 1640) English MP for Mitchell
 * John Sparke (died 1680) English MP for Plymouth
 * Joseph Sparke, antiquary
 * Linda Sparke, astronomer
 * Penny Sparke, writer and academic
 * Philip Sparke, composer
 * Thomas Sparke, clergyman
 * Thomas Sparke (bishop)

title: Sparke


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Word Extinguisher

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep and cleanup. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:18, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

One Word Extinguisher
Tagged as since 05:39, 28 Feb 2005 UTC. Zzyzx11 22:14, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup, album by Prefuse 73, listed on Amazon, 16K+ Google hits. I added a link to the band page.—Wahoofive | Talk 22:25, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup. Contains a user signature and a load of pasted lists. Once cleaned up, the article is notable. Hedley 03:19, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup. -℘yrop (talk) 03:38, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Talk:MOS Technology 65C02

Acciordin to the speedy atttempt

''The Western Design Center produced the this chip - not MOS technology. An article is already available at Western Design Center 65C02 - TreveX 19:50, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)''

However if so this is not a speddy, I have mad it inot a redirect for th moment. Rich Farmbrough 22:14, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:MOS Technology 65C02


text:
Contour plowing

Contour bunding or contour farming or contour ploughing is the farming practice of plowing and/or planting across a slope following its elevation contour lines. These contour lines create a water break which reduces the formation of rills and gullies during times of heavy precipitation, allowing more time for the water to settle into the soil. In contour plowing, the ruts made by the plow run perpendicular rather than parallel to the slopes, generally furrows that curve around the land and are level. This method is also known for preventing tillage erosion. Tillage erosion is the soil movement and erosion by tilling a given plot of land. A similar practice is contour bunding where stones are placed around the contours of slopes. Contour ploughing has been proved to reduce fertilizer loss, power and time consumption, and wear on machines, as well as to increase crop yields and reduces soil erosion.

Soil erosion prevention practices such as this can drastically decrease negative effects associated with soil erosion such as reduced crop productivity, worsened water quality, lower effective reservoir water levels, flooding, and habitat destruction. Contour farming is considered an active form of sustainable agriculture.

History
The Phoenicians first developed the practice of contour farming and spread it throughout the Mediterranean. However, the Romans preferred cultivation in straight furrows and this practice became standard.

Modern history
This was one of the main procedures promoted by the US Soil Conservation Service (the current Natural Resources Conservation Service) during the 1930s. The US Department of Agriculture established the Soil Conservation Service in 1935 during the Dust Bowl when it became apparent that soil erosion was a huge problem along with desertification.

The extent of the problem was such that the 1934 "Yearbook of Agriculture" noted that ''Approximately 35 million acres [142,000 km2] of formerly cultivated land have essentially been destroyed for crop production. . . . 100 million acres [405,000 km2] now in crops have lost all or most of the topsoil; 125 million acres [506,000 km2] of land now in crops are rapidly losing topsoil.'' This can lead to large scale desertification which can permanently transform a formerly productive landscape to an arid one that becomes increasingly intensive and expensive to farm.

The Soil Conservation Service worked with state governments and universities with established agriculture programs such as the University of Nebraska to promote the method to farmers. By 1938, the introduction of new agricultural techniques such as contour plowing had reduced the loss of soil by 65% despite the continuation of the drought.

Demonstrations showed that contour farming, under ideal conditions, will increase yields of row crops by up to 50%, with increases of between 5 and 10% being common. Importantly, the technique also significantly reduces soil erosion, fertilizer loss, and overall makes farming less energy and resource intensive under most circumstances. Reducing fertilizer loss not only saves the farmer time and money, but it also decreases risk of harming regional freshwater systems. Soil erosion caused from heavy rain can encourage the development of rills and gullies which carry excess nutrients into freshwater systems through the process of eutrophication

Contour plowing is also promoted in countries with similar rainfall patterns to the United States such as western Canada and Australia.

The practice is effective only on slopes with between 2% and 10% gradient and when rainfall does not exceed a certain amount within a certain period. On steeper slopes and areas with greater rainfall, a procedure known as strip cropping is used with contour farming to provide additional protection. Contour farming is most effective when used with other soil conservation methods like strip cropping, terrace farming, and the use of cover crops. The proper combination of such farming methods can be determined by various climatic and soil conditions of that given area. Farming sites are often classified into five levels: insensitive, mild, moderate, high and extreme, depending on the regions soil sensitivity. Contour farming is applied in certain European countries such as Belgium, Italy, Greece, Romania, Slovenia and Spain in areas with higher than 10% slope.

P. A. Yeomans' Keyline Design system is critical of traditional contour plowing techniques, and improves the system through observing normal land form and topography. At one end of a contour the slope of the land will always be steeper than at the other. Thus when plowing parallel runs paralleling any contour the plow furrows soon deviate from a true contour. Rain water in these furrows will thus flow sideways along the falling "contour" line. This can often concentrate water in a ways that exacerbates erosion instead of reducing it. Yeomans was the first to appreciate the significance of this phenomenon. Keyline cultivation utilizes this "off contour" drift in cultivating furrows to control the movement of rain water for the benefit of the land. ( See Chapter 7 in Priority One History of Twentieth Century Soil Conservation and Keyline.)

Contour bunding has been widely adopted in Burkina Faso after it was suggested by British Oxfam worker Bill Hereford in the beginning of the 1980s.

title: Contour plowing