text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle Group

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete (pending). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:32, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Newcastle Group
This private equity group does not appear to have a website. Google hits on "Newcastle group" seem to refer to scientific collaborations. In particular, searching on "Newcastle group" + "Thieme" (the claimed 25-year-old chairman, see Christopher D. Thieme) turns up 3 hits, all Wikipedia clones. -- Curps 20:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Christopher D. Thieme is the Chairman, and Newcastle Group is quite real, but being a private, closely held company, some information about it is not well known. It manages assets of 13 billion US dollars.
 * The problem is, it seems its very existence is not very well known (to Google at least). Google of "Newcastle Group" + "private equity" only seems to turn up Wikipedia clones and a handful of other false-positive hits. -- Curps 20:52, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If this company is so private that little is known about it, I think that qualifies it as being not notable. -Casito⇝Talk 22:46, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 23:09, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. Rossami (talk) 23:15, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. There appears to be a company called "Newcastle Group" out there, but it doesn't appear to be the one mentioned in this article. --Carnildo 23:17, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. Its supposed chairman is non-notable, and a hoax as well.  RickK 23:46, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Emilia Fox

Emilia Rose Elizabeth Fox (born 31 July 1974) is an English actress and presenter whose career is primarily in British television. Her feature film debut was in Roman Polanski's film The Pianist (2002). Her other motion pictures include the Italian–French–British romance-drama The Soul Keeper (2002), for which she won the Flaiano Film Award for Best Actress; the drama The Republic of Love (2003); the comedy-drama Things to Do Before You're 30 (2005); the black comedy Keeping Mum (2005); the romantic comedy-drama Cashback (2006); the drama Flashbacks of a Fool (2008); the drama Ways to Live Forever (2010); the drama-thriller A Thousand Kisses Deep (2011); and the fantasy-horror drama Dorian Gray (2009).

Fox's television roles include the BBC drama Pride and Prejudice (1995), the PBS British/German television serial Rebecca (1997), ITV Granada's Henry VIII (2003), BBC's Gunpowder, Treason & Plot (2004), the 2005 BBC miniseries The Virgin Queen (2005) and the ITV crime drama series Fallen Angel (2007). She also appeared as Morgause in the BBC's Merlin, beginning in the programme's second series. Fox also starred in Delicious (2016). She stars as Dr. Nikki Alexander on the BBC crime drama Silent Witness, having joined the cast in 2004 following the departure of Amanda Burton. Fox is the longest serving cast member since the departures of Tom Ward in 2012 and William Gaminara in 2013.

Early life
Emilia Fox was born in Hammersmith, London. She comes from a thespian family – her mother is actress Joanna David (née Joanna Elizabeth Hacking) and her father is actor Edward Fox; her uncle James Fox and her cousins Jack, Laurence and Lydia are also actors. She has a brother, Freddie (also an actor), and a half-sister, Lucy. She was educated at the independent Bryanston School near Blandford Forum, Dorset, where she played the cello, and at St Catherine's College, Oxford, where she read English. Her great-great-grandfather was Samson Fox, a self-made millionaire, and her great-grandmother was the actress Hilda Hanbury, sister of Lily Hanbury. Her grandfather was Robin Fox, a theatrical agent. Through Hanbury, she is related to the Terry family of actors.

Career
Fox first appeared as Georgiana, the sister of Colin Firth's Mr. Darcy, in the 1995 television adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, followed by her role as the second Mrs. de Winter in the 1997 television adaptation of Rebecca, opposite Charles Dance. In 1998 she starred with Ben Miles in the adaptation of Catherine Cookson's The Round Tower as the young Vanessa Radcliffe, a girl from an affluent family who is forced to leave her home after becoming pregnant. Fox played Jeannie Hurst in the 2000 remake of Randall and Hopkirk.

In 2002 she starred in The Pianist as Dorota, a beautiful, blond, non-Jewish cellist who adores the playing of the Polish-Jewish pianist and composer Władysław Szpilman (played by Adrien Brody). The film was directed by Roman Polanski. In 2003, she played Jane Seymour in a two-part television biographical film about King Henry VIII. She also played the title role in Katherine Howard, directed by Robin Lefevre at the Chichester Festival Theatre in 1998.

In 2004, she joined the cast of the crime drama, Silent Witness. As of 2023, she is still in the show and has now played the role of Nikki Alexander for nineteen years. 2004 also saw her play Lady Margaret in Part 2 of Gunpowder, Treason and Plot, the mini-series about James I (James VI in Scotland) and the Gunpowder Plot. In 2005, Fox appeared in the BBC miniseries The Virgin Queen, a four-part miniseries based upon the life of Queen Elizabeth I, Fox played Amy Dudley, the first wife of Robert Dudley, played by Tom Hardy, despite appearing in only one episode, her character remains a key character in the series. In 2008 she played Sister Jean in Baillie Walsh's Flashbacks of a Fool, which also featured Daniel Craig. She also starred in Things To Do Before You're 30 with Billie Piper, who would later marry her first cousin Laurence Fox, although in 2016 they divorced.

She was cast as Lynne Frederick in the 2004 film The Life and Death of Peter Sellers, which starred Geoffrey Rush in the lead role. A whole section of the film focusing on the Frederick/Sellers relationship was removed in the final edit, although she can be seen briefly in a background shot towards the end of the film. The deleted scenes with Fox can be found among the special features on the DVD release of the film.

in 2007, Fox was reunited with her Rebecca co-star Charles Dance when they starred together in the ITV1 mini-series Fallen Angel, Fox played a serial killer Rosie Byfield, with Dance appearing as her father. The rewind format in which the show was shot traced the development of the killer streak of Fox's character. Fox and Dance had previously both appeared in ITV1's Henry VIII, but Dance's role as the Duke of Buckingham was limited, as his character was arrested for treason less than fifteen minutes into the first half, while Fox's scenes as the doomed third Queen Jane Seymour dominated the first half of the second episode. In the 2008 English language DVD re-release of the cult 2006 Norwegian animated film Free Jimmy, Fox voiced the character of "Bettina". The dialogue was written by Simon Pegg; other actors included Pegg himself and Woody Harrelson. Emilia Fox narrates the popular children's book We're Going on a Bear Hunt (by Michael Rosen and Helen Oxenbury) with Kevin Whately in a special edition book and DVD set. She appeared as Morgause in the second series of BBC's Merlin in 2009. She returned for the third and fourth series. The same year, she portrayed Queen Elizabeth II in the Channel 4 documentary The Queen.

She narrated the Doctor Who character Lady Winters in the Doctor Who Adventure Game, The Gunpowder Plot, (2011). She had previously played Berenice in the Eighth Doctor audio drama Nevermore.

In 2015, she appeared as Julia Swetlove in the BBC's dramatisation of J. K. Rowling's book The Casual Vacancy. The following year, she appeared in series 2 of The Tunnel as Vanessa Hamilton. In 2016–18 she starred as Sam Vincent in Delicious, a Sky television drama. Silent Witness, in which Fox stars, resumed on BBC1 in January 2018.

In 2019, Fox co-presented the BBC documentary Jack the Ripper – The Case Reopened, alongside criminologist David Wilson. In 2021, Fox and Wilson teamed up to present a full series of documentaries looking at cold cases, titled In the Footsteps of Killers. The second series aired in January 2023.

Personal life
In 2000, Fox was engaged to the comedian Vic Reeves; she subsequently dated Toby Mott.

In July 2005, she married the British actor Jared Harris, the son of the Irish actor Richard Harris. The couple announced their separation in 2008, and Harris filed for divorce in January 2009. The divorce followed the breakdown of their long-distance relationship and her 2007 miscarriage.

Following her separation from Harris, Fox began a relationship with actor Jeremy Gilley, and in May 2010 it was reported that Fox was pregnant with their child. In November 2010, Fox gave birth to a daughter. They split up in 2011.

She dated chef Marco Pierre White from 2012 to 2016, and Luc Chaudhary from 2019 to 2020. She is currently in a relationship with TV producer Jonathan Stadlen.

Fox is a patron of the drug, alcohol and gambling addiction charity DrugFam.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Emilia Fox


text:
List of Monégasque consorts

This article lists women married to the sovereign prince of Monaco during his reign. Until 1612, the title was held by the spouse of the lord of Monaco.

Since her marriage to Albert II on 1 July 2011, Charlene has been princess consort of Monaco.

Hereditary Princesses

 * Wives of Hereditary Princes of Monaco who never became Princesses of Monaco

 * Lady Mary Victoria Douglas-Hamilton, the first wife of Albert I, divorced in 1880
 * Louise d'Aumont, wife of Honoré IV, divorced in 1798
 * Maria Aurelia Spinola, wife of Ercole, Marquis of Baux

title: List of Monégasque consorts


text:
Talk:Uruguayan Peso

how many pesos is one dollar

 * Current UYU exchange rates
 * AUD | CAD | NZD | USD

title: Talk:Uruguayan Peso


text: User talk:129.123.27.31

title: User talk:129.123.27.31


text:
Julio Terrazas Sandoval

Julio Terrazas Sandoval (March 7, 1936 – December 9, 2015) was a Cardinal Priest and Archbishop Emeritus of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Santa Cruz de la Sierra in the Roman Catholic Church.

Biography
Born in Vallegrande, Bolivia, he was the member of the Terrazas family, prominent in Cochabamba and Santa Cruz. He was a close relative of Generals Hernán Terrazas Céspedes and David Terrazas Villegas, and a distant relative of Melchor Terrazas and Manuel Terrazas.

Terrazas Sandoval was ordained a priest in 1962. He earned a degree in social ministry from EMACAS University, France. In Bolivia, he was superior of the Vallegrande Redemptorist community before being appointed Auxiliary of La Paz in 1978. He was later transferred to Oruro in 1982. He chaired the Episcopal Commission on the Laity, Youth and Vocations, was a member of CELAM's Commission on the Laity, and was elected President of the Bolivian Episcopal Conference on four occasions.

Appointed Archbishop of Santa Cruz in 1991, Terrazas Sandoval was made a Cardinal by Pope John Paul II on 21 February 2001. He was one of the cardinal electors who participated in the 2005 papal conclave that selected Pope Benedict XVI, and also one of the cardinal electors who participated in the 2013 papal conclave that selected Pope Francis.

On May 25, 2013, Pope Francis accepted the resignation he submitted when he turned 75. He was immediately succeeded as Archbishop of Santa Cruz de la Sierra by his Coadjutor Archbishop, Sergio Alfredo Gualberti Calandrina.

Terrazas died aged 79 after several complications in his health.

title: Julio Terrazas Sandoval


text: Category:Multiple units

title: Category:Multiple units


text:
Florida Department

Florida is a department of Uruguay. Its capital is Florida. It is located in the south of the central part of the country with Durazno Department to its north, the departments of Treinta y Tres and Lavalleja to its east, Canelones Department to its south and the departments of Flores and San José to its west.

History
Florida Department was formed on 10 July 1856 from part of San José Department.

In 1760 the first populated place in its territory started by creating a fortress, the Fortín del Pintado, and in 1809 the "Villa de San Fernando de la Florida" was created. During the events of the Independence of Uruguay, a temporary government was set up in this town, and on 25 August 1825, the Congreso de la Florida proclaimed the three fundamental laws of the new independent country.

Geography
Most of the border of the department with Durazno Department in the north is formed by the Yí River, with many of its tributaries flowing in the north part of the department. From east to west, these are the streams: Arroyo del Pescado, Arroyo Molles del Pescado, Arroyo Illescas, Arroyo Sauce, Arroyo Mansavillagra, Arroyo Timote, Arroyo Molles del Timote, Arroyo de Castro, Arroyo Sarandí and Arroyo Sauce de Villaneuva, which also forms the border near the city of Durazno. The border then follows Arroyo Batoví a tributary of Arroyo Maciel, the later forming big part of the border of the department with Flores Department to the west and is itself a tributary of Yí River.

Further south, separating the department from San José Department to the west, is the stream Arroyo de la Virgen, a tributary of Santa Lucia River. The later forms the south border of the department, separating it from Canelones Department, with its tributaries flowing through the south part of the department. From east to west, these are: Arroyo Chamaré and Arroyo Casurá, both of which are part of the east border of the department, Arroyo Chamizo, Arroyo de Arias and the Santa Lucia Chico River, with Arroyo de Pintadito as its tributary. A dam in the course of the Santa Lucia Chico River near 25 de Mayo and Cardal forms the Paso de Severino Reservoir.

Crossing the middle of the department from west to east and separating the streams of the north with those of the south, is the Cuchilla Grande Inferior hillrange, which joins the Cuchilla Grande hillrange in the east of the department.

Demographics
As of the census of 2011, Florida Department had a population of 67,048 (32,953 male and 34,095 female) and 29,437 households.

Demographic data for Florida Department in 2010: 2010 Data Source:
 * Population growth rate: 0.431%
 * Birth Rate: 13.92 births/1,000 people
 * Death Rate: 9.56 deaths/1,000 people
 * Average age: 33.5 (32.4 male, 34.6 female)
 * Life Expectancy at Birth:
 * Total population: 77.43 years
 * Male: 74.28 years
 * Female: 80.91 years
 * Average per household income: 21,978 pesos/month
 * Urban per capita income: 9,039 pesos/month

 * Rural population

According to the 2011 census, Florida department has a rural population of 9,101.

title: Florida Department


text:
List of ECMAScript engines

An ECMAScript engine is a program that executes source code written in a version of the ECMAScript language standard, for example, JavaScript.

Just-in-time compilation engines
These are new generation ECMAScript engines for web browsers, all implementing just-in-time compilation (JIT) or variations of that idea. The performance benefits for just-in-time compilation make it much more suitable for web applications written in JavaScript.

 * Carakan: A JavaScript engine developed by Opera Software ASA, included in the 10.50 release of the Opera web browser, until switching to V8 with Opera 15 (released in 2013).
 * Chakra (JScript9): A JScript engine used in Internet Explorer. It was first previewed at MIX 10 as part of the Internet Explorer 9 Platform Preview.
 * Chakra: A JavaScript engine previously used in older versions of Microsoft Edge, before being replaced by V8.
 * SpiderMonkey: A JavaScript engine in Mozilla Gecko applications, including Firefox. The engine currently includes the IonMonkey compiler and OdinMonkey optimization module, has previously included the TraceMonkey compiler (first JavaScript JIT) and JägerMonkey.
 * JavaScriptCore: A JavaScript interpreter and JIT originally derived from KJS. It is used in the WebKit project and applications such as Safari. Also known as Nitro, SquirrelFish, and SquirrelFish Extreme.
 * JScript .NET: A .NET Framework JScript engine used in ASP.NET based on Common Language Runtime and COM Interop. Support was dropped with .NET Core and CoreCLR so its future looks questionable for ASP.NET Core.
 * Tamarin: An ActionScript and ECMAScript engine used in Adobe Flash.
 * V8: A JavaScript engine used in Google Chrome and other Chromium-based browsers, Node.js, Deno, and V8.NET.
 * GNU Guile features an ECMAScript interpreter as of version 1.9
 * Nashorn: A JavaScript engine used in Oracle Java Development Kit (JDK) since version 8.
 * iv, ECMAScript Lexer / Parser / Interpreter / VM / method JIT written in C++.
 * CL-JavaScript: Can compile JavaScript to machine language on Common Lisp implementations that compile to machine language.
 * BESEN: A complete JIT-compiling implementation of ECMAScript Fifth Edition written in Object Pascal.
 * Hermes: developed by Facebook for React Native mobile apps Can also be used independent from React Native.
 * Graal.js: An ECMAScript compliant JavaScript engine for GraalVM which supports language interoperability that can also execute Node.js applications.

Runtime interpreter engines
The following engines use runtime interpreters, which do not compile into native machine code and generally run more slowly:

 * Continuum: A self-interpreter that supports older drafts of the ECMAScript 2015 specification. Uniquely, the engine is implemented in ECMAScript 3, which made it possible to run ES2015 in browsers as old as IE6.
 * Futhark: The ECMAScript engine of the Opera web browser versions 9.50 to 10.10.
 * InScript: An obsolete proprietary library used for iCab 2 and 3.
 * JScript: The engine that is used in Internet Explorer for versions up to IE9, and one component of the MSHTML (Trident) browser engine.
 * Jint: Javascript interpreter with integrated engine for .NET
 * KJS: The engine used in Konqueror, and one component of KHTML, a predecessor to JavaScriptCore.
 * Linear B: The ECMAScript engine of the Opera web browser versions 7.0 to 9.50, exclusive.
 * Narcissus: JavaScript implemented in JavaScript (a meta-circular evaluator), intended to run in another JavaScript engine, of theoretical and educational nature only.
 * JS-Interpreter A lightweight JavaScript interpreter implemented in JavaScript with step-by-step execution.
 * QtScript: Originally developed by Trolltech, now owned by The Qt Company. It provides QObject integration with JavaScriptCore.
 * V4 (QJSEngine): Qt's newer ECMAScript engine, powering QML and QtQuick. ES6-compliant and under active development at The Qt Company. V4 is JIT compiled.
 * Rhino: One of several JavaScript engines from Mozilla, using the Java platform.
 * YAJI: An ECMAScript engine based on the FESI implementation by Jean-Marc Lugrin in 1999, using the Java platform, currently being developed to support the latest standards (ECMAScript spec. 262, v5.1).
 * Microvium: JavaScript engine for microcontrollers, supporting a restricted subset of the ECMAScript specification, using less than 16kB of flash memory and 64B of RAM while idle.
 * Duktape: A small footprint, easily embeddable Ecmascript E5/E5.1 engine.
 * XS JavaScript Engine: An ECMAScript 2020-compliant engine for microcontrollers with limited resources. XS is maintained by Moddable as part of the Moddable SDK and was formerly part of the Kinoma Platform.
 * Jsish: An ES5.1 subset interpreter with builtin SQLite, JSON, WebSocket, and ZVFS support.
 * Espruino: A very small footprint interpreter specifically for microcontrollers. Can run in less than 8 kB of RAM by executing from source (rather than bytecode).
 * MuJS: A lightweight ECMAScript interpreter library, designed for embedding in other software to extend them with scripting capabilities. Originally developed for MuPDF.
 * mJS: Restricted JavaScript engine. Used for Internet of Things (IoT).
 * Tiny-JS: A minimal JavaScript interpreter written in C++.
 * JerryScript: A lightweight JavaScript engine by Samsung for microcontrollers with less than 64 KB RAM.
 * njs: A lightweight JavaScript interpreter optimized for web server scripting and fastest VM context creation; used in nginx.
 * QuickJS: A lightweight ECMAScript 6 interpreter by Fabrice Bellard and Charlie Gordon.
 * engine262: A JavaScript engine written in JavaScript for development and exploration. It is primarily used to validate the ECMAScript specification.
 * Boa: A JavaScript engine written in Rust.
 * ScriptEase: an old proprietary engine last updated in 2003. Only notable for its use in the James Webb Space Telescope.
 * LibJS: JavaScript engine of the SerenityOS and Ladybird project. Initially it was an AST interpreter, but has been upgraded to a bytecode-based one. At some point, the developer Andreas Kling was working on porting it to Just-in-time compilation, but he later changed his mind, citing development/debugging issues while also saying that he is interested to see how far utility and usability of the engine can go without it.

title: List of ECMAScript engines


text: Category:JavaScript dialect engines

title: Category:JavaScript dialect engines


text: User talk:80.213.136.164

title: User talk:80.213.136.164


text: User talk:84.67.129.57

title: User talk:84.67.129.57


text:
Action plan

An action plan is a detailed plan outlining actions needed to reach one or more goals. Alternatively, it can be defined as a "sequence of steps that must be taken, or activities that must be performed well, for a strategy to succeed".

Origin
An action plan is a tool in social planning. It is an organizational strategy to identify necessary steps towards a goal. It considers details, may help limit setting for an organization, and is efficient in that it saves resources over trial and error. A written action plan also serves as a token for an organization's accountability.

Setting goals
A goal is the primary objective of an action plan. Setting goals gives the possibility of your dreams and prospects being brought to life. It creates motivation and provides you with a certainty that the final outcome will be worthwhile, preventing any wasted time and effort. This is achieved by being fully dedicated to the process and using the structured guide to accomplishing it. Although hard work may be produced, without a successful end goal the ideal result you set to achieve, will not prevail.

Creation
When creating action plans there are guided steps that need to be followed to ensure success, however the structure can be altered in the process. Firstly, you will need to outline what you want to achieve from the project, by doing this you set yourself targets. After this the specific roles will need to be allocated ensuring sufficient amount of training, resources and issues have been considered to ensure solving any problems that may occur. The next stage allows members of the group to analyse the progress by outlining milestones, solving any issues and making any necessary changes. Lastly once the project has come to an end the final stage can be examined to ensure future success.

Execution
Mike Desjardins has suggested the following

 * Ownership: one person must be responsible and accountable for tracing the progress, keeping team informed, ensuring timely action steps are occurring and adjusting the actions.
 * Action steps should be clear and actionable versus vague ideas or thoughts.
 * Responsibility: each action step needs to have one person responsible.
 * Support: For each action step, determine who will support the person responsible. This can be multiple people. The key is that they're not responsible for the action or outcome.
 * Informed: keeping the right people in the communication loop for each action is critically important. Key people might need to understand the state of progress around your actions to see how they affect other actions and objectives.
 * Metrics and budget: each action step must have a metric that tells us that the action is complete. For example, if you needed to survey your customers and don't have the internal resources to run the survey or want to protect anonymity, using an outside resource will require money that might not be included in your current operating budget
 * Completion date

Advantages
Producing an action plan can be beneficial not only for individual basis but also for businesses. For example, it allows project managers or any member of a group to monitor their progress and take each task step-by-step, therefore allowing them to handle the project efficiently. The advantage of doing this is, it allows you to execute a structured plan for the end goal you intend to achieve. Furthermore, it provides the team with appropriate foundations, therefore prioritising the amount of time you spend on each task. This will then prevent any sidetracking that may occur. Lastly, it creates a bond within a team, as each member is aware of their individual role, as well as providing necessary information to ensure success of the project.

Issues
When using action plans limitations will need to be considered. Firstly, each member of the team will need to be allocated individual roles and tasks which will require completion by a set date. This can be demanding for some, due to coping with the stress and distractions that may occur. Another issue is not being guided thoroughly and effectively, leading to the lack of effort and passion a member has for the project. In addition to this, if the communication throughout the team is non-existent, key information will not reach members of the group, causing lack of confidence. Lastly failing to obtain the goal you set to reach can lead to frustration and in turn the planning would have been a waste of time. There can be more addition to this article.

Risk management
To benefit from risk management action plans, you need to examine certain possibilities that could affect the process, such as observing any threats and correcting them. For example, key aspects of risk management are to ensure you allocate members specific roles and monitor the risks throughout, to ensure tasks are completed with efficiency. This being a major factor, as evaluating what happens during and after the project, will allow finding the positive and negative elements of each stage in the planning, providing you the ability to develop on the risks further.

Council of Europe
The Council of Europe has organized some action plans for helping its member states. An example of this is the Council of Europe Action Plan for the Republic of Moldova 2021–2024, created with the purpose of improving Moldova's situation on democracy, human rights and rule of law and its state institutions and legislation.

European Union
Some European Union directives describe action plans in order to reach a defined target in air quality or noise reduction. If the target cannot be reached by a member state, the member needs to write a report. Sometimes action plans contain deadlines by which the plan must be ready to start the action(s) and the targets are to be reached.

title: Action plan


text:
Marine clay

Marine clay is a type of clay found in coastal regions around the world. In the northern, deglaciated regions, it can sometimes be quick clay, which is notorious for being involved in landslides.

Marine clay is a particle of soil that is dedicated to a particle size class, this is usually associated with USDA's classification with sand at 0.05mm, silt at 0.05-.002mm and clay being less than 0.002 mm in diameter. Paired with the fact this size of particle was deposited within a marine system involving the erosion and transportation of the clay into the ocean.

Soil particles become suspended when in a solution with water, with sand being affected by the force of gravity first with suspended silt and clay still floating in solution. This is also known as turbidity, in which floating soil particles create a murky brown color to a water solution. These clay particles are then transferred to the abyssal plain in which they are deposited in high percentages of clay.

Once the clay is deposited on the ocean floor it can change its structure through a process known as flocculation, process by which fine particulates are caused to clump together or floc. These can be either edge to edge flocculation or edge to face flocculation. Relating to individual clay particles interacting with each other. Clays can also be aggregated or shifted in their structure besides being flocculated.

Particles configurations
Clay particles can self-assemble into various configurations, each with totally different properties.

This change in structure to the clay particles is due to a swap in cations with the basic structure of a clay particle. This basic structure of the clay particle is known as a silica tetrahedral or aluminum octahedral. They are the basic structure of clay particles composing of one cation, usually silica or aluminum surrounded by hydroxide anions, these particles form in sheets forming what we know as clay particles and have very specific properties to them including micro porosity which is the ability of clay to hold water against the force of gravity, shrink swell capacity and absorption capabilities.

When clay is deposited in the ocean, the presence of excess ions in seawater causes a loose, open structure of the clay particles to form, a process known as flocculation. Once stranded and dried by ancient changing ocean levels, this open framework means that such clay is open to water infiltration. Construction in marine clays thus presents a geotechnical engineering challenge.

Where clay overlies peat, a lateral movement of the coastline is indicated and shows a rise in relative sea level

Effect on building foundations
Swelling of marine clay has the potential to destroy building foundations in only a few years. Due to the changes in climatic conditions on the construction site, the pavement constructed on the marine clay (as subgrade) will have less durability and requires lot of maintenance cost. Some simple precautions, however, can reduce the hazard significantly.

The swapping of this positive cation with another is what makes different types of clays including Kaolinite, montmorillonite, smectite and illite. This happens in marine clays because the ocean's water is high in solution with cations making it very easy to overcome the clays negative net charge and swap the clays cation with a less positive one. These marine clays can be what are known as quick clays, which are notorious for its erosive properties. A great example of these quick clays is in the pacific northwest. They are known as blue goo which is a mix of clay and mélange (greenstone, basalt, chert, shale, sandstone, schists. uplifted through the accretionary wedge). These quick clays have a very high-risk factor associated with them if they are built upon, as they are very unstable due to the fact that liquefaction happens when it becomes saturated and literally flows, causing mass wasting events to happen. Other marine clays are used all around the world for many different uses, such as ceramics, building material, including adobe. Clay layers in soils which can be used as an impermeable layer are very important for dumps or chemical spills as they have a very high absorption capacity for heavy metals. For these clays to be available for human use they must have been eroded, deposited on the ocean floor and then uplifted through means of tectonic activity to bring it to land.

During the construction of Marina Barrage in Singapore, marine clay was found at the site. Since marine clay was the cause of the Nicoll Highway collapse years previous, the construction team removed all the marine clay to ensure the stability of Marina Barrage. Later on, they found marine clay mixed with seawater even in the deeper underground.

Geotechnical problems posed by marine clay can be handled by various ground improvement techniques. Marine clay can be densified by mixing it with cement or similar binding material in specific proportions. Marine clay can be stabilised using wastes of various industries like porcelain industry and tree-cutting industries. This method is usually adopted in highways where marine clay is used as a subgrade soil.

title: Marine clay


text:
Talk:The Secret Doctrine

Albert Einstein bogus claim
An IP is repeatedly making the claim that Albert Einstein had a copy of The Secret Doctrine and it inspired the theory of relativity. This is a bogus claim not supported by any scholars, it was originally taken from Theosophy Wiki. The source is supposed to have been Einstein's niece but he is never confirmed to have had a niece. It is a bogus claim only found in Theosophical literature and does not belong on Wikipedia. We need reliable sources not hearsay. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

 * Not bogus. Is there a source that says he didn't have one? What source do you have claiming that it's made up? 132.205.229.216 (talk) 20:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

 * The WP:BURDEN is upon he who posits something. Anyway, Einstein was a thorough materialistic rationalist, and had nothing but contempt for occultism. His "cosmic religion" consisted of materialistic rationalism.
 * Einstein's Weltanschauung was simply not compatible with the theosophical Weltanschauung. More like opposites.
 * "Physicists Werner Heisenberg and Erwin Schrödinger, two of the main pioneers of quantum mechanics, were interested in Eastern mysticism, but are not known to have directly associated one with the other." From quantum mysticism.
 * Einstein was the adversary of quantum mysticism, his spirituality could not be conceived bereft of rationalistic philosophy (like that of Spinoza) and mainstream science.
 * So, if you think of Einstein, think of a hardcore Spinozist materialist, who only retained from mysticism disdain for authority and a sense of wonder which fitted perfectly within his materialist conception of life. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:22, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The original source for the claim that Einstein had a copy of The Secret Doctrine was Sylvia Cranston's biography of Blavatsky. She wrote "According to his niece, Einstein always had a copy of it on his desk" (HPB: The Extraordinary Life and Influence of Helena Blavatsky, p. 434). Sylvia Cranston was not a historian or scholar, she was a Theosophist and her biography of Blavatsky was far from neutral . As tgeorgescu cites WP:BURDEN, the burden of proof is on the claimant. There are no scholarly references to back up Cranston's claim and no Einstein biographer has supported or verified such a claim. It is likely to be a hoax. Psychologist Guy (talk) 10:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * To be accurate, Einstein retained something about the veil of Maya, but that was seen through his wholly materialistic lens. I think he got that from Schopenhauer. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If you don't like the word "materialism", replace it with "scientific naturalism": Einstein was a hardcore scientific naturalist. The claim is thus WP:REDFLAG. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:45, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

"pseudoscientific" again
The use of the term "pseudoscientific" is sourced and has previously been discussed on the talk page at Talk:The_Secret_Doctrine/Archive_1. Meters (talk) 00:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:The Secret Doctrine


text:
Bochum-Innenstadt

Innenstadt is a part of the city of Bochum in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany including Gleisdreieck. It is located in the Ruhr area, the most populous German agglomeration.

It includes the central business district of Bochum. Gleisdreieck (triangle of rails) is limited by railway lines. Bochum-Innenstadt additionally has tram lines running to Wattenscheid and other parts of the city as well as to the neighbouring towns of Hattingen, Gelsenkirchen and Herne. Bochum-Innenstadt is the site of the school which Herbert Grönemeyer, the singer of the best selling German album of the 20th century, 4630 Bochum attended. Bochum-Innenstadt is the site of the Bermudadreieck (Bermuda triangle), the main and heterogeneous area of bars frequented by the youth in the Ruhr area.

Innenstadt is the part of Bochum where the city hall and other public buildings as well as historical churches are situated.

title: Bochum-Innenstadt


text:
Teikyo University

Teikyo University (帝京大学) is a private university headquartered in the Itabashi ward of Tokyo, Japan. It was established in 1931 as Teikyo Commercial High School (帝京商業高等学校). It became Teikyo University in 1966. It is part of Teikyo Group, a multinational educational foundation that also operates language and cultural exchange facilities at pre-university levels in various countries.

The university consists of eight undergraduate facilities, one junior college, and six graduate schools. Five main campuses in Japan are supplemented by several overseas campuses that provide study-abroad opportunities for Japanese students, as well as Japanese-oriented learning for residents of the campuses' home countries. Total enrollment is about 20,000 students. Although the headquarters is the Itabashi campus, the majority of students (approximately 17,000) are enrolled at the Hachiōji campus in West Tokyo.

In the 2019 and 2020 editions of its university rankings, Times Higher Education ranked Teikyo University among the top 501-600 universities in the world and 78th in Asia.

Campuses in Japan

 * Itabashi Headquarters campus (Itabashi, Tokyo)
 * Hachiōji campus (Hachiōji-shi, Tokyo), including a junior college and graduate school
 * Sagamiko campus (Sagamiko-machi, Tsukui-gun, Kanagawa-ken)
 * Utsunomiya campus (Utsunomiya-shi, Tochigi)
 * Fukuoka campus (Omuta-shi, Fukuoka)

Campuses in other countries

 * Teikyo University of Japan in Durham, associated with Durham University, UK
 * Teikyo University Berlin Campus in Berlin, Germany

Former campuses
Also, the Harvard University School of Public Health and the Teikyo University School of Medicine have an ongoing collaboration called the Teikyo–Harvard Program, established in 1993.
 * Salem-Teikyo University in Salem, West Virginia, USA (1990–2002)
 * Teikyo Loretto Heights University in Denver, Colorado, USA (1989–2016) {closed in 2016}
 * Teikyo Post University in Waterbury, Connecticut, USA (1990–2004)
 * Teikyo University Holland in Maastricht, Netherlands (1991–2007)
 * Teikyo–Marycrest University, then Marycrest International University in Davenport, Iowa, USA (1990–2002) {closed in 2002}
 * Teikyo–Westmar University in Le Mars, Iowa, USA (1990–1995) {closed in 1997}

Undergraduate programs

 * Medical technical
 * Medicine

Notable alumni

 * Ryoko Tani (Olympic gold medalist in judo)
 * Iemitsu Arai (Mayor of Fukaya)
 * Togi Makabe (professional wrestler)
 * Shota Horie (Rugby union footballer)
 * Carlos Yulo (Filipino artistic gymnastics world gold medalist)
 * Ayumi Uekusa (Japanese karateka)
 * Roland (Japanese host and TV personality) graduated from Teikyo Koutou High School.

College sports
In 1970, Teikyo University established its renowned rugby club. Rugby gameplay was not so fantastic until 1995. However, since 2008, the rugby college has produced strong outcomes in domestic universities and beyond Keio Gijyuku, Waseda, Meiji and Doshisha. The university continuously clinches "champion" status in the "All Japan University Championship" from 2009 to the 2017 seasons.

title: Teikyo University


text:
Talk:Marine clay

-contribution regarding the geotechnical problems of marine clay. --Zeizmic 20:11, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Marine clay


text:
Samuel Goldwyn Films

Samuel Goldwyn Films, LLC is an American film company that licenses, releases and distributes art-house, independent and foreign films. It was founded by Samuel Goldwyn Jr., the son of the Hollywood business magnate/mogul, Samuel Goldwyn. The current incarnation is a successor to The Samuel Goldwyn Company.

Background
After The Samuel Goldwyn Company was acquired by Orion Pictures Corporation in 1996 and by MGM in 1997, Samuel Goldwyn Jr. founded Samuel Goldwyn Films as an independent production/distribution studio. Until his death, the younger Goldwyn owned sole rights to the use of the name and signature logo as part of the settlement of his 1999 lawsuit against MGM, which changed its Goldwyn subsidiary's name to G2 Films. Goldwyn previously operated IDP Distribution, which distributed films for Fireworks Films, Stratosphere Entertainment, and Roadside Attractions.

Films
This is a list of films distributed and/or produced by Samuel Goldwyn Films.

title: Samuel Goldwyn Films


text:
Selaön

Selaön is the largest island in Mälaren, Sweden, and covers 94.72 km². It is located at Stallarholmen, east of Strängnäs, and it has about 1,800 permanent residents. It is connected by a bridge to the mainland. It is the largest island in any lake in Sweden. In the Heimskringla, Granmar, the king of Södermanland, was murdered on this island by Ingjald Illruler.

title: Selaön


text:
Talk:Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kyiv Patriarchate

Old talk
Paged move to UOC-Kiev Patriarchy. Please see the Talk:Ukrainian Orthodox Church and other talk pages in my edit history. Irpen 20:12, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

Please see the note at Talk:Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Thanks! -Irpen 20:23, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

Moves
Please no more article moves without discussion. Current name is here for a reason. You are welcome to propose them move of course but do not assume anything. Ask for feedback first. --Irpen 08:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

'four more bishops left the Church with their parishes'
'parishes' or 'dioceses'? I think if 'parishes' is correct it implies that each bishop took only one parish, namely the one he regularly served in. If it means 'all his parishes' then 'dioceses' would be clearer.142.68.44.16 00:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Eastern Orthodox jurisdictional churches in Asia
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church - Kiev Patriarchate is a church (meaning denomination, not building) of the Eastern Orthodox Church, and in Asia, thus I putit in "Eastern Orthodox jurisdictional churches in Asia"

Please explain why you took it out-- Carlaude (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Kyiv Patriarchiate: proper noun
Kyiv Patriarchate refers to an actual church body, an institution, and is thus a proper noun, not a reference specific to the city, just as FC Dynamo Kyiv refers to a football club, also an institution, and is also a proper noun. In English correspondence, the Київський Патріархат does not refer to itself as the Kiev Patriarchate, but instead as the Kyiv Patriarchate. For example, this differs from a title such as "The Bishop of Kyiv/Kiev" which references the city. -67.225.38.162 (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * addendum: for anyone wishing to make further edits to the page, until the city name Kiev is changed within wikipedia to the more common Kyiv, within this article, where references are made specifically to the city, Kiev is to be used. For example, where it says in the sidebar, the correct usage for the time being is "Headquarters: Kiev." Also to note, the only reference to Kiev Patriarchate before it was corrected, was in the title. Everywhere else in the article the proper noun was used correctly. -67.225.38.162 (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Kyiv Patriarchate Churches in Ukraine
I'd suggest a new section of the listing of KP churches in Ukraine also be added. For now, I've added the two prominent churches of KP in the see also section. -67.225.38.162 (talk) 21:49, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism to article
I've noticed the Kyiv Patriarchate has been vandalised to Kiev several times, without changes to the discussion page nor with changes to the body text. Once again, the Kyiv Patriarchate is an institution, and according to the WP policy should follow convention to retain the name the organization is known by. If you feel the article should be changed to Kiev, you need to state your rational reason before changing it. -Yakym (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The preceding two sections and part of the one before those moved here from this page, the result of an old cut-and-paste move. Ucucha 14:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not done. After four weeks of discussion, I am not seeing consensus for any particular title here. I suggest further discussion on the component issues (i.e. abbreviation, Kyiv vs Kiev, hyphen vs conjunctions) before specific proposals. Skomorokh  06:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Ukrainian Orthodox Church - (KP) → Ukrainian Orthodox Church - Kyiv Patriarchate — This is the full title. --Vanjagenije (talk) 13:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * An amusing effort to include the nationalist spelling of Kiev. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Or, to Ukrainian Orthodox Church - Kiev Patriarchate? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:14, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, or Kiev, I don't know which spelling is correct, I just think that this "(KP)" in the article title looks bad. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It's now been moved to another title; is this title fine with everyone here? Ucucha 10:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Kyivan looks weird - can't we keep the present title (which seems to be an exact translation of the original name) but replace Kyivan with Kiev, which people will recognize? Or follow the pattern of Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate)?--Kotniski (talk) 13:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * So Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Kiev Patriarchate) or Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Kyiv Patriarchate)? The IP in the section above this one makes a reasonable case that "Kyiv" is indeed preferable here. Ucucha 13:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not convinced - we don't have to follow what the body uses for itself, but should prefer what is most likely to make sense to readers. Unless there's a lot of usage of Kyiv for this body in independent sources, I would go with Kiev, since that's the most recognizable name to English-speaking readers. (FC Dynamo Kiev would also be a perfectly reasonable name for the same reason.)--Kotniski (talk) 13:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I looked around a little in Google Books and found all kinds of different names, but you are right, Kiev is apparently more common even in this context. I think I might prefer Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kiev Patriarchate, since that would seem more reader-friendly than something within parentheses and is used reasonably often. (Same would go for the Moscow Patriarchate page, of course.) Ucucha 13:58, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

4th citation
The fourth citation is merely a link: there is no actual citation for the website. The citation should be written down and a date provided so that if the webpage it links to ever changes, the citation would still be valid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.27.111.8 (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Khmelnytsky Uprising
"Eventually the persecution of Orthodox Ukrainians, led to a massive rebellion under Bohdan Khmelnytsky [...]".

I would rather say "Eventually the persecution of Orthodox Ukrainians, next to many other complicated economical, social and political reasons, led to a massive rebellion under Bohdan Khmelnytsky [...]".

If Cossacks were not treated as worse subjects of the King, and were granted nobility (at least a major part of their elites), they wouldn't be so pro-rebellious.

Secondly, there was a big problem within the private fiefs, where some Jews and Poles renting inns, lands and villages from aristocratic landowners, wanted to make as big profit as possible within the rent period, overusing peasants. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.72.184.67 (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Serious errors in the article
The article currently has a number of rather glaring errors.
 * 1) Patriarch Bartholomew (hereafter Bart) has not granted autocephaly to the UOCKP. He has established sacramental communion with it and declared the clergy to be restored to their claimed clerical ranks and no longer in schism from the Church. Point 3
 * 2) He has rescinded a letter from 1686, which Constantinople now claims was temporary in nature, granting jurisdiction over Ukraine to Russia. Effectively Bart is now claiming jurisdiction over Ukraine for the Ecumenical Patriarchate.Points 2 & 4
 * 3) And he has reiterated his intention to grant autocephaly at some point in the presumably near future. point 1

None of this is currently recognized by any other canonical Orthodox church. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:30, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed on all points. I believe the article should be locked from editing by IPS for a week or so to prevent the edits similar to the recent ones like 1 and 2 and add the three points you've listed above to the body of the article. Openlydialectic (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You will have to make that request at RfPP as I am WP:INVOLVED. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:38, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Tried my best 1 Openlydialectic (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * From what I've read in most news sources, Bart has given autocephaly.--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 12:02, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Even the Orthodox Christianity blog, owned by Russians, acknowledges they were granted autocephaly here: http://orthochristian.com/116462.html TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * No, he has not. There are two major schismatic churches in Ukraine. One self identifies as the "Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kiev Patriarchate." The other self identifies as the "Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church." All Bart did was establish sacramental communion with them, declare their clergy to be canonical and lift the various excommunications, claim jurisdiction over Ukraine on behalf of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, and reiterate that he plans to grant autocephaly to a single unified Orthodox church in Ukraine at an as yet unspecified future date. None of this is currently recognized by any other canonical Orthodox Church. I think you are being confused by the name of the second of the two schismatic churches which contains the word "autocephalous." -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Let me put this bluntly. He has granted autocephaly to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kiev Patriarchate. Just about every news article from all sources mention the Kiev Patriarchate's move toward being granted autocephaly since April. The decision was hotly debated between Bartholomew and Kirill, yet in the end, as seen, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has indeed moved forward and granted autocephaly, as even evident from that Russo-biased website I linked prior, and in this letter from the Ecumenical Patriarchate: https://www.patriarchate.org/-/communiq-1. What you are doing is putting your own pro-Russia information into the article, and writing it from a standpoint where its autocehaly has not been approved whatsoever (which is in fact, a lie). Now, regarding me and my supposed "confusion", barely any article mentions the latter church because no one dared to truly pay much attention to them, especially since they walled themselves off voluntarily according to many online sources. There cannot be confusion because over 90% of the discussions and articles pertain to Filaret and Kiev Patriarchate. Autocephaly is granted. It just needs to be delivered to them in paper, and as seen in multiple sources, that may come by November.--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Again, you are making statements that are not accurate. The EP has stated "To renew the decision already made that the Ecumenical Patriarchate proceed to the granting of Autocephaly to the Church of Ukraine." (emphasis mine) No tomos has been granted, and indeed cannot because there is no specific target with a unified ecclesial structure. The EP has been quite clear that they will need to have some kind of meeting to merge the various jurisdictions into one unified Ukrainian Church before the tomos can be granted. I concede the near certainty that one is coming. The non-recognition of the rest of the Orthodox world is neither here nor there on this point. But the EP has not issued a tomos of autocephaly... yet. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks for clarifying.--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 01:28, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Just to chime in here, at the very least, the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople recognizes that UOC-KP is in communion with Eastern Orthodoxy. At least that has to be in the article. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The Ecumenical Patriarch recognizes that the UOC-KP is in communion with him (the EP) and his local Orthodox church. They remain in schism from the rest of the Church. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Then by your words, it is actually autocephalous and part of the Orthodox Church. The Russian Patriarch recognizes that the OCA is in communion with him and his "allied" Slavic patriarchs and their churches. The OCA is not recognized by the Greeks yet everyone else accepts it. Therefore, we must put that autocephaly and communion is granted with these Ukrainian churches, otherwise I would be right about you a "Russified" sentiment being pushed here...--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 13:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no need for editors to accuse and impute each other of impropriety due to nationalistic "sentiments"! The facts can be easily checked and they speak for themselves. Firstly, the link to the article by the Russian Orthodox Church only states (correctly) that the Patriarchate of Constantinople “canonically restored” the head of the “Kiev patriarchate” and the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church — nowhere does it claim that Autocephaly had already been granted, only that it had been "initiated". As already pointed out, the latest official communique of the Ecumenical Patriarch (dated 11 October 2018) states that a decision was made to "proceed to the granting of Autocephaly". Nowhere does it state that Autocephaly was granted! The situation does not need to be interpreted by editors — it may be best to read the confirmation that autocephaly has not been granted just yet in detail in a major Ukrainian-language newspaper, the Українська Правда (11 October 2018) which outlines the steps needed in the future to achieve Autocephaly. Also, this is confirmed in a major English-language Ukrainian newspaper, the Kyiv Post (14 October 2018): "The Kyiv Patriarchate and the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church are planning to merge with pro-independence bishops of the Moscow Patriarchate into an independent (autocephalous) Ukrainian church, which is expected to receive a tomos". How much more plain can this be? Very trivial (talk) 23:26, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming the rest of us are Orthodox, split between the Greek and Slavs. You helped solve this. Thanks.TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 02:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * TheTexasNationalist99, you err on several counts. When talking about such matters, read actual documents, not journalistic claptrap: written for those who know nothing about the subject by those who know even less. See my posting below, in the next thread. Apropos the OCA, the jurisdiction is recognized by all; but Phanar views it as a part of the Moscow Patriarchate (as they do not recognize, as a matter of principle, the right of the new Patriarchates, which had been established by them without an ecumenical council′s imprimatur, to grant autocephaly). The autocephaly to the Church in Ukraine (not the KP!) has not been granted yet. More importantly for this article, autocephaly is not about to be granted to the Kieve P, but to a new body that has yet to be instituted at the constituent council of all the bishops of all jurisdictions who are willing horses.Axxxion (talk) 00:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that was already clarified...TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 01:00, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

The Schism of 2018 article might be of interest
This article -- Schism of 2018 -- might be of interest to editors here. Maybe we can put a summary on this page of the dispute and point people to this article as the main article. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 03:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting!--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 00:50, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The event (the split) is naturally relevant; but, technically speaking, it does not belong to this article: the split thus far is between the Sees of Moscow and Constantinople. I agree with some postings above that the Kiev P′s status as a whole (as a jurisdiction) has not really changed yet (moreover, Philaret is not recognized as Patriarch by Phanar ). The decision of 11th Oct, if carefully read, only means that the clergy of the two jurisdictions in question are henceforth in communion with the Church of Constantinople. Moreover, by rescinding the 1686 Decree, Phanar has effectively re-asserted its own jurisdiction over Ukraine ("the eparchy of Kiev"), which could be the most important part of the Synod′s deed, not yet internalised in Ukraine. The situation at this stage is exceedingly opaque as to what will occur next. Best we wait and see. The only thing that is utterly clear now is that the chain of events thus triggered is of grave importance that far exceeds the squabble between the two groupings of clergy. I would like to be mistaken but all indications suggest this is just a prelude for a serious all-out conflict, possibly not just between Ukraine and Moscow, but much wider. My point being: Let′s be chary of rash editing.Axxxion (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Ecumenical Patriarchate
is there any reliable sources for this new name? I mean this edit: --Nicoljaus (talk) 14:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have just followed rename in German wiki: de:Ukrainisch-Orthodoxe Kirche – Ökumenisches Patriarchat --Shmurak (talk) 14:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * There are bunch of sources there. Probably I will try to add them here too. --Shmurak (talk) 14:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Shmurak, you have no right to make such edits until you get consensus on this page. There is no RS for such renaming, right the opposite is the case: just have a look-see of their official site, pls.Axxxion (talk) 15:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but the article in Wikipedia itself is not a RS for another Wiki-article.--Nicoljaus (talk) 20:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church
Nicoljaus undid my insertion of the word "independent" in a reference to the Independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church (MP). If you were to consult the official website of the Russian Orthodox Church (MP) you will see that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is listed as independent. Obviously, actually labelling it correctly is causing an issue.Moryak (talk) 21:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Direct link please. However, regardless of what they write on the "official website", even their formal status is "autonomous". In practice, they are fully obedient to Moscow.--Nicoljaus (talk) 21:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Statistics
The statistics section of this Wiki article contains interesting data that has no citation of origin. Unless and until such a source citation is provided, the statistical information presented should be considered UNVALIDATED and possibly incorrect.Moryak (talk) 16:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * that has no citation of origin - This is an incorrect statement, there are links in the statistics section.--Nicoljaus (talk) 21:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Is the UOC-KP of 2019 a continuation of the UOC-KP of 1992?
I think Filaret and his supporters say "Yes". But, others will not agree – the OCU views itself as the only lawful successor as UOC-KP 1992, and so would say that UOC-KP 2019 is something new – and I think Constantinople would endorse the OCU position on this. I think what position the Ukrainian state authorities and court system take on this question would be important, but it appears to me they haven't reached a definitive decision on that point as yet. I guess, what concerns me, is this article seems to (even if only implicitly) endorse Filaret's view that 2019 UOC-KP is a continuation of 1992 UOC-KP, when that is a controversial claim which many others will not accept. I think, maybe it would be better to split the article, in to one on 1992 UOC-KP and one on 2019 UOC-KP, to make clear the claim of continuity/identity between them is controversial. Or, if people don't agree with an article split, at least quarantine discussion of the 2019 UOC-KP to one section, and make clear that its opponents don't accept its claim to be a continuation of the 1992 UOC-KP. SJK (talk) 01:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The UOC-KP was never legally liquidated, the recent jugement of the District Administrative Court of Kiev supports this, althought I know it constitutes in no way a final and absolutely decisive argument; this non-liquidation has also been confirmed by the primate of the UAOC,  UAOC which legally liquidated itself... on 14 August 2019, way after the unification council.  Moreover, the UOC-KP still - as far as I know - uses the same statutes as before it joined the OCU, has kept some hierarchs, the same primate, some churches, etc. I therefore personally believe there is a continuity, and I hope you will concede at least that there is a continuity in the same way as the UAOC of 1990 was the successor to the 1921 and the 1942 UAOC.Veverve (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * As far as I can see, the Ukrainian authorities haven't yet reached a definitive decision on this issue yet. The court decision to which you refer, as far as I am aware, it is not a final decision, it is still subject to further legal proceedings, it is a decision of a court of first instance which can be appealed, so we should really wait until the legal process is complete before saying the Ukrainian legal system has endorsed the claim that "2019 UOC-KP = 1992 UOC-KP". It also has to be weighed against the previous decision of the Ukrainian Ministry of Culture which said the opposite. Plus, even if it is true that 1992 UOC-KP still exists, that doesn't conclusively prove that 2019 UOC-KP is same thing as 1992 UOC-KP; maybe, they are two separate organisations that exist side-by-side, with the 1992 organisation being in some sort of suspended or rump state? (I'm not saying such a thing is true, just that I think it is a possibility that can't be definitively excluded given the evidence before us.) Given the matter is controversial, and the Ukrainian authorities have not as yet made a crystal clear decision for one side or the other, I think it is important for Wikipedia to appear neutral in the dispute, but I don't think the article as it currently stands does this, since it appears to endorse the claim rather than leaving it open. Also, I'm not sure that the claim "2019 UOC-KP = 1992 UOC-KP" necessary has the same status as the claim that "1990 UAOC = 1942 UAOC = 1921 UAOC". The claim about the UOC-KP is rejected by some significant players; did anyone significant reject the equivalent claim about the UAOC? Anyway, if the answer to that is "Yes", I think the proper response would be to split the UAOC article as well, or at least make it clear that the continuity is disputed, just as I'm proposing to do for this article. SJK (talk) 09:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)


text:
Kacha

Kacha or KACHA may refer to:

Places

 * Kacha, Sevastopol, an urban-type settlement under the jurisdiction of the city of Sevastopol on the Crimean Peninsula
 * Kacha (air base), a Black Sea Fleet naval airbase
 * Kacha, Iran, a village in Gilan Province, Iran
 * Kacha, Russia, several rural localities in Russia
 * Kāchā, alternative name of Kacha-ye Chahardeh, a village in Gilan Province, Iran

People

 * Kacha (sage), a mythological sage in Hinduism
 * Kacha (king), c. 4th century Gupta king of India
 * Michael Kácha (1874–1940), Czech anarchist

Other

 * Kacha (river), a river in Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia
 * 2760 Kacha, a minor planet
 * Kaurna Aboriginal Community and Heritage Association (KACHA)

title: Kacha


text:
Talk:Languages of India

Not true
Hindi is not our official language. India having more numbers of native languages. He don't have any official language and all. Even suprime court of india uses English in their petition. All the state government uses their own native languages has their communication between other states so there is no official language india has. 2405:201:D010:21BE:F443:EA68:8F07:64A9 (talk) 07:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Article 343(1) of the Constitution provides that Hindi in Devanagari script shall be the Official Language of the Union. See this. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Classical Languages of India
The link to "classical languages" should redirect to "classical languages of India" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Languages_of_India) and not to "classical language" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_language) as it currently stands. WizardLuigi (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅RegentsPark (comment) 13:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Semicolon in First Sentence
Can someone with an account add in a semicolon to the first sentence (between 'Indians' and 'both'), so as to replace the comma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.93.75.130 (talk) 16:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

 * Done. Thanks for pointing it out. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 04:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Grammar
Error: more than once - it is “number of speakers” not “amount of speaking”. Patrick Pregiato (talk) 15:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Thank you. Let us know if you see others. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 05:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Languages of India


text:
User:Adityad

Entering my profile for reasons unknown .. I am sorry but I havent had too much time or thought to put into this. Happy browsing

title: User:Adityad


text:
Talk:Keying (vandalism)

Does anyone have any opinion any word that can substitue "vandalism" so that the word has nothing to do with its Wikipedia meaning. (FYI the word's Wikipedia meaning is the only meaning I've been used to prior to 2 days ago.) Georgia guy 20:13, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Is this a definition?

 * I don't think it's necessary to change the word "vandalism". Wikipedia vandalism is named after real-world vandalism, not vice-versa.  WP:ASR doesn't specifically mention this sort of situation, but I think that it covers it in spirit.  Same for WP:NOT, though to a lesser degree (specifically, the part about Wikipedia being an encyclopedia first, and a community in service to that goal).  Pages about intra-wikipedia matters, like vandalism of articles, are in a different namespace (recognizable by the Wikipedia: or WP: before the page name), so there's no need to change articles in the main namespace to prevent confusion. Icarus (Hi!) 20:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

 * This is just a substub. It should be a redirect as is unlikely to be more than a dicdef.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:Keying (vandalism)


text:
Ethical Threads

Ethical Threads is a clothing manufacturer based in the United Kingdom. The company is wholly owned by the Battersea and Wandsworth Trades Union Council and the London Region GMB Union. The company was created as a source of ethical non-sweatshop clothing, and all producers follow international conventions of workers rights and will not employ child labour. Ethical Threads' organically grown cotton is supplied by the Vasudha Cotton Project in India to the Oeko-tex standard.

The company was boosted in 2002 when the Glastonbury Festival sourced official merchandise from Ethical Threads, who used disabled workers at Remploy for manufacturing. That year, Ethical Threads hosted The Left Field area of the festival. The Glastonbury Festival subsequently banned sweatshop sourced clothing following a campaign by Billy Bragg.

A report by the Maquila Solidarity Network highlighted the difficulty small organisations like Ethical Threads have in ethical sourcing, because they often lack clear labour standards and certification criteria, and monitoring programmes, that advocates demand of larger brands.

title: Ethical Threads


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Wordsworths School

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. sjorford →•← 08:32, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Bishop Wordsworths School
Doesn't appear notable. David Johnson [ T|C ] 20:14, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmm, Oscar winning actor, Rugby Union world cup winning sportsman, a teacher from 1945 to 1962 who wrote Lord of the Flies (novel) and won the Nobel Prize for literature? Nah, can't see anything notable there. Come on, even I'd say this is a Keep Average Earthman 21:54, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Damm, I should have looked more closely at the article. It should be kept of course... David Johnson [ T|C ] 22:22, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Reply: Unless someone objects, can this be delisted? There is no point in marring a perfectly good article if everyone agrees it should be kept.  —RaD Man (talk) 04:08, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nomination fails to comply with deletion policy criteria.--Gene_poole 22:52, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Just out of curiosity, which policy are you referring to? android↔talk 02:07, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * The policy that I named 2 lines above where I am posting this response. --Gene_poole 04:02, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the obtuse non-answer. That was a sincere question. Wikipedia policy is spread out all over the place and sometimes contradicts itself. All I wanted was a link. Sheesh. android↔talk 04:10, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Probably of a piece with the Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, ergo it is encyclopedic rationale he used on Votes for deletion/El Camino Bible Church. --Calton | Talk 05:25, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Gene Poole is just being argumentative. The deletion policy is not all-inclusive, and as long as your nomination was made in good faith, it is valid. While I'm sure there are good arguments for keeping this article, "invalid nomination" is not one of them. Radiant_* 07:35, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Once more, for the dummies: There is no Wikipedia policy that explicitly names "non-notability" as a valid criterion for article deletion - let alone even defining what the term is supposed to mean. Nominations for deletion made on the basis on "non-notability" are therefore completely, totally and unquestionably invalid. End of story. --Gene_poole 22:58, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Once more, for the intellectually dishonest Wikilawyers, there's nothing in Wikipedia policy that explicitly prohibits nomination of articles under any criteria other than bad faith. That's why it's a vote (with discussion) for deletion. There is, though, an explicit prohibtion against double voting through sockpuppets, which I'm glad to see has stopped for certain editors. --Calton | Talk 01:42, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the lesson in misrepresentation; to my knowledge nobody here has claimed that nominations unsupported by established policy are explicitly forbidden. However, the monotonous regularity with which such nominations are concluded as keepers should serve to illustrate the futility of perpetuating such resource-wasting exercises by nominators seeking to promote as consensus eccentric opinions at variance with precedent and prevailing community attitudes. --Gene_poole 04:19, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * futility of perpetuating such resource-wasting exercises by nominators seeking to promote as consensus eccentric opinions at variance with precedent and prevailing community attitudes. Mileage varies. No, actually, reality varies. --Calton | Talk 11:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * First, read No personal attacks. Second, you are wrong about the 'monotonous regularity' by which they are kept. Notability is a de facto criterion, and the fact that you don't like it does not give you the right to badger people who do. Civility dictates otherwise. Radiant_* 09:38, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. No question.  —RaD Man (talk) 01:56, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, even before I attempt improvement. This school's history and alumni make this school notable, even though notability should not be an issue when it comes to high schools.  --BaronLarf 02:04, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Great example of a notable high school. android↔talk 02:06, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable school, worthy of inclusion in a truly great encyclopaedia. Klonimus 03:23, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable alumni and teacher make it notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 05:11, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, although there are lots of schools like that. Kappa 05:15, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * A lot of schools with a teacher who later won the Nobel Prize for Literature? I doubt it... Average Earthman 10:10, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * True, the fact that Lord of the Flies is about schoolchildren makes it more relevant. Kappa 17:04, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Make a mention in Salisbury and delete- Skysmith 09:39, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Are you suggesting that the Salisbury article should be somewhere in the education menu? Oliver Chettle 02:33, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 'keep it doesnt seem deletable Yuckfoo 21:52, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems notable with a good bit of history behind it. --NormanEinstein 14:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Average Earthman's post.  ALKIVAR ™[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 09:48, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Talk:Void pointer

Why merge into the C article? It is an artifact of the language, just like C trigraph or Struct. Yaron 20:14, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree. The information would be lost in the C article, and there are tons of articles for specific programming constructs.

title: Talk:Void pointer


text:
Talk:Quintic function

Auxiliary equation
Auxiliary equation is mentioned three times, it needs explaining! 86.166.163.239 (talk) 08:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I have edited the article for clarifying this. D.Lazard (talk) 09:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Tagged assertion
Before my recent edits, the article contained the following assertion, which I quote verbatim for the record:

 * It is then a necessary (but not sufficient) condition that the irreducible solvable quintic
 * $$z^5 + a\mu^4z + b\mu^5 = 0\,$$
 * with rational coefficients must satisfy the simple quadratic curve
 * $$y^2 = (20-a)(5+a)\,$$
 * for some rational $$a, y$$.

As it is, it is a mathematical non-sense. I have tried to give it a meaning by replacing y by b, and rewording the sentence, but this results in a wrong assertion (at least if there is no typo in the formula for Cayley's resolvent). As no source is provided, which allows to correct this sentence, I'll remove it as D.Lazard (talk) 09:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

 * There is another option:

 * $${x}^{5}+k_{2}\,x+k_{1}=0$$

 * $$k_{2}=\frac{5\,{b}^{2}\,\left( {b}^{2}\,g-{c}^{3}\right) \,\left( {b}^{4}\,{g}^{2}-{b}^{2}\,{c}^{3}\,g-{c}^{6}\right) \,\left( {b}^{4}\,{g}^{2}+4\,{b}^{2}\,{c}^{3}\,g-{c}^{6}\right) }{c\,{g}^{3}\,{\left( {b}^{2}\,g+{c}^{3}\right) }^{3}}$$

 * $$k_{1}=\frac{{b}^{2}\,\left( {b}^{2}\,g-{c}^{3}\right) \,\left( {b}^{4}\,{g}^{2}+{c}^{6}\right) \,\left( {b}^{8}\,{g}^{4}-22\,{b}^{6}\,{c}^{3}\,{g}^{3}-6\,{b}^{4}\,{c}^{6}\,{g}^{2}+22\,{b}^{2}\,{c}^{9}\,g+{c}^{12}\right) }{{c}^{2}\,{g}^{4}\,{\left( {b}^{2}\,g+{c}^{3}\right) }^{4}}$$

 * $$m=\frac{{b}^{3}\,c\,g-b\,{c}^{4}}{{b}^{2}\,{g}^{3}+{c}^{3}\,{g}^{2}}$$

 * solution:

 * $$g\,{m}^{\frac{4}{5}}-\frac{b\,g\,{m}^{\frac{3}{5}}}{c}+c\,{m}^{\frac{2}{5}}+b\,{m}^{\frac{1}{5}}$$

 * Sorry, I'm probably writing in the wrong section, but my additions were removed (I'm new). — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.Samokrutov (talk • contribs) 16:35, 21 May 2015

 * Please sign your posts in the talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ).
 * This formula seems a new parameterization of solvable quintics in Bring–Jerrard form. The article gives already three different such parameterizations, which are all simpler than yours. As Wikipedia is not a media for publishing original research (see WP:OR), this new parameterization cannot be inserted in Wikipedia if it has not been published in a referred and notable academic journal. Ever if it has been reliably published, it is not necessary worth to mention it in Wikipedia: this would need that it would be cited in secondary sources (see WP:SECONDARY), or, at least that it is evident that would improve the article. In any case, because of your conflict of interest (see WP:COI), you are misplaced to judge if this would improve the article. D.Lazard (talk) 20:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

 * Please look quintic, sextic, septic maybe something fit for a wiki? A.Samokrutov (talk) 16:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

 * Again, without a referred article explaining the meaning of these formulas, how there were obtained, and why they are interesting, these formulas may not be inserted in Wikipedia.
 * PS to my preceding post: There is no evidence that above parameterized set of quintics is solvable. A proof of solvability could be an expression of b, c, g in terms of k1 and k2 or of the rational root of the Cayley's resolvent in terms of b, c, g. D.Lazard (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Depressing the quintic
Article reads: "the Tschirnhaus transformation ...which depresses the quintic". I bet most readers have no idea what it means to "depress" a quintic. Some more explanation would be helpful (or maybe even an article on depressing polynomials?). --104.132.34.86 (talk) 23:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

 * . D.Lazard (talk) 09:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quintic or irreducible quintic?
The section Quintic function (paragraph 2) says

 * If the quintic is solvable, one of the solutions may be represented by an algebraic expression involving a fifth root and at most two square roots, generally nested.

Should this start out as "If an irreducible quintic is solvable..."? I ask because a quintic that can be factored into a cubic and a quadratic can be solved without fifth roots—can it also be solved using a fifth root? Loraof (talk) 21:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Every equation may be solved using a fifth root. It suffice to replace any number appearing in the solution by the fifth power of its fifth root. This may seem a joke, but Galois theory allows showing that fifth roots (if any) may always be eliminated from any solution of an equation of lower degree. The beginning of the section already said that "solvable quintics" refer to irreducible quintics solving by radicals. I have clarified this by adding that only irreducible quintics are considered in the section. D.Lazard (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Quintic function. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140701060849/http://library.wolfram.com/examples/quintic/ to http://library.wolfram.com/examples/quintic/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Interwiki links recently disappeared
This page in english is now an orphan on wikidata, no more linked to the corresponding pages in other languages. Anne Bauval (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * . The problem is that somebody has decided that "Quintic function" should be different from "Quintic equation". Some time ago, I have encountered this problem with Fibonacci number and Fibonacci sequence. I have copied from there the mysterious way for fixing the problem. D.Lazard (talk) 08:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You fixed the problem here (made the corresponding pages in other languages visible from here), and so did I on the page in french (made your page in english visible from there), but this page in english is still no longer visible from, for instance, the page in german. Anne Bauval (talk) 08:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Function vs. polynomial
The name "quintic polynomial" is much more common in Google ngrams than "quintic function". It's also more explicit. I'll move the article unless I hear objections. --Macrakis (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. However, as there are 3 lines in the history, I guess that you should pass through a move request.
 * By the way, a similar move would be useful for cubic, quartic, and other, as in all these articles the "function" aspect is minor, and most of the content is devoted to the equations, which are studied using only polynomial technics. D.Lazard (talk) 07:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

The root z in the Cayley's resolvent
Unfortunately I am unable to find the relation between the root z in the Cayley's resolvent and the actual root y of the depressed quintic equation - the one lacking the biquadratic term in y! I scanned several times the related paragraphs in the main wiki-article but couldn't see a given relation. Can you help me see if there is any of such relation given in the article? If not, please add it immediately. I wait for your reply in my e-mail account. Yours truly, Quinctic reader (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC) K. S. UYANIK (53, Turkish citizen in Ankara city of TURKEY.)
 * The article says: Cayley's result allows us to test if a quintic is solvable. If it is the case, finding its roots is a more difficult problem, which consists of expressing the roots in terms of radicals involving the coefficients of the quintic and the rational root of Cayley's resolvent. This means that it is difficult to find the relationship between the rational root of Cayley's resolvent and the roots of the quintic. In fact, I have given a solution to this problem (cited in the article), and the description of the formula is three pages length. D.Lazard (talk) 20:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Broken link or bad external reference
The first external link to the Quintic Equation Solver appears to be broken, or the solver isn't working. Page comes up blank. 173.243.178.8 (talk) 22:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

 * I have removed it. Thank you for pointing this out.—Anita5192 (talk) 23:35, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Section on Hermite's work
Insists to add a section specifically on Hermite's work on the subject. This section is not convenient for this Wikipedia article. Firstly, it seems to be an wp:original synthesis of several Hermite's articles. In any case, no WP:secondary sources are provided. Moreover, this editor describes (in an edit summary) his edit as "I made everything very carefully. Read the Hermite essay in the Italian version on page 258! These is this special formula. And I only did regular calculation algorithms we all know. And the last step I wrote down in this article just needs the theorems of the lemniscate elliptic functions that are also known already". This is exactly what is called "original research" in Wikipedia. So, the Wikipedia policy WP:NOR implies to remove this new section.

There are other reasons to remove this section: firstly, notations are not defined, nothing is said on the relation of the first formula with the general quintic, and the final result is not explained. This is not acceptable for an encyclopedia. Also, Hermite's work is mentioned in the preceding section, which refers to Bring radical for details. In the linked article, the relation of the subject with elliptic integrals is detailed and the other authors who have contributed are mentioned.

In other words, this new section is a poor duplication of an existing content. This is a further reason for removing it. D.Lazard (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Quintic function


text:
Timebox

Timebox may refer to:

 * Timeboxing, a time management method
 * Timebox (band), the 1960s musical group

title: Timebox