text:
User talk:Ventolin

Conas atá tú?
How's it going? Welcome to Wikipedia(if you haven't been welcomed already). I notice you have a bun-leibhéal of Gaeilge. If you didn't know, there's a wikipedia in Irish too, ga, it would be great if you could come over and help us with articles. We're just a tad bit under-staffed at the moment with about 2 and a half active members. It doesn't matter about your level of Irish, come on and create articles and we'll clean them up for you at a later date. You could start with adding years, they're easy to translate from English without making too many mistakes and they really help the number of articles. You might also want to check the Irish wikipedians notice board WP:IWNB for Irish wikipedians. Bí ann.- Dalta 17:26, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:)
Thanks for the greeting! However I don't think my level of Gaeilge is near good enough to start contribution to ga.wikipedia.org. However, I do have a friend in college doing Computational Linguistics and Irish, who is, like most modern Irish speakers, very enthusiastic about the language and its revival. He is also rather adept with computers and I think he would take wikipedia seriously and become a frequent contributor, so I'll certainly pass this message onto him.

 * Wow, that would really be great, we could certainly use another acitve member of the wiki. And, despite your lack of Gaeilge, you could certainly help in added categories or just creating stub articles for others to correct or lengthen. Anyway, enjoy your wiki-ing.- Dalta 20:10, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia UK/Wikimania 2006
Hi, this is a circular to Wikipedians in Ireland to draw your attention to Wikimedia UK, where the establishment of a local Wikimedia chapter for the United Kingdom (and possibly for the Republic of Ireland) is being discussed. See the talk page, as well as the mailing list; a meetup will take place to discuss matters in London in September, for anyone who can get there. On another topic, plans are being drawn up for a UK bid for Wikimania 2006, which would be conveniently close to Ireland. On the other hand, Dublin's bid was one of the final three last year - might we bid again? --Kwekubo 19:38, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Hello Ventolin
If you have a spare minute, would you be able to cast a glance over Martyn, see if it needs help via your advertised skills. It would be appreciated, as I would like to turn this into a feature article. Cheers, Fergananim 19:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Removal of sysop bit.
It was over a controversy regarding the block of Nathanrdotcom, which resulted in the temporary departure of myself and the permanent departure of Sergeant Snopake. It was voluntary, preventive, and I could get the powers back by the "back door" at any time. But RFA is much better :) Will (Tell me, is something eluding you, Sunshine?) 22:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Perhaps if I can't even edit my own user page, I don't deserve to edit an encyclopedia. --Cody.Pope 09:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

your message
hi there Ventolin,

concerning your question on the Commons, I believe I took those images summer of 2005. Why? sincerley Gryffindor  11:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Ireland email list
Hi Ventolin:

I just wanted to let you know that we've started a new Ireland Wikimedian email list, that you can join, at WikimediaIE. For Wikimedians in Ireland and Wikimedians interested in events in Ireland and efforts in Ireland. It's there to to discuss meetups, partnerships with Museums and National Archives and any other similar events. --Bastique demandez 22:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Kehrwoche
The poor translation had been identified by other editors as having issues, and it wasn't clear to me why it was notable, especially as it seems to be treated as a joke. However, I've restored the text on the assumption that you can tidy it up and make it clearer why it's notable,  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ventolin


text:
Talk:Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves

Removal from bosses section
The removal of content was due to the fact that I was unable to find any information in regard to those particular entries into that section. If you wish to replace them, please be so kind as to give me a link to where I can find information that will verify those entries as legitimate. --Chanting Fox 17:27, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks to a little work (and the fact that a certain video has been made downloadable to Gamespot Basic users), I was able to confirm one of the three bosses that were added by the anon. user as legitimate.  However, the other two were not.  In one case, there wasn't enough information to verify whether that boss actually fulfilled the requirements for being a boss, and the other appears to be the result of a misunderstanding. It appears that the "magician lion" is in reality either Muggshot the Bulldog (doubtful) or "The Shaman" (highly probable). --Chanting Fox 15:13, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Cleaned up
I made some changes to the Sly 3 page. (Mostly correcting tenses) Others need to clean it up though.

Cleanup Update
There have been significant changes made overall, including total tenses update and the compression of the lengthy introduction. Also, the plot has been added. I personally believe that tthis page is ready to be taken off the "cleanup" list. If there is anything anyone believes should be added/deleted, please do so now. CryptoStorm 16:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Being bold.
I'm going to clean this up, and add a couple sections (Gameplay and Plot). Oh yeah, adding features. Abby724 18:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Added Skills
I felt the article needed more descriptions of the skills required in the game; safe cracking, plane flying, disguises etc. So I added them! This is my first ever edit, so sorry if its not up to scratch. Surlysearle 17:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Surlysearle

Tone of article
Some of the article doesn't sound encyclopedic, and also, Wikipedia shouldn't have original research. You know, no "judging by" sort of things. Abby724 05:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

What's with the plot?
Seriously, it's written in a very awkward, run-on, almost narrative style... and it desperately needs to be cleaned up. Someone with a lot of spare time should get to work clearing it up... --Luigifan (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Delete the soundtrack, replace with Reception
This game needs a reception section, and the soundtrack is pretty much useless in an article; it also uses too much space.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225112510/http://store.suckerpunch.com/ProductImages/soundtrack1.jpg to http://store.suckerpunch.com/ProductImages/soundtrack1.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves


text:
Porto Empedocle

Porto Empedocle ('a Marina) is a town and comune in Italy on the coast of the Strait of Sicily, administratively part of the province of Agrigento. It was named after Empedocles, a Greek pre-Socratic philosopher and a citizen of the city of Akragas (present-day Agrigento), in his day a Greek colony in Sicily. The primary industries of Porto Empedocle are agriculture, fishing, ironworking, pharmaceuticals and rock salt refining.

Climate
Porto Empedocle is the second comune with the lowest amount of degree days in Italy. It is in the climatic zone A of the climatic classification of Italian municipalities.

History
Born as a port zone in the old Girgenti, today called Agrigento, under the name of Marina di Girgenti (seashore of Girgenti), since in the 15th century it was the main cereal trading centre of the region. From 1549 to 1554, by order of the viceroy Vega, Torre del caricatore of Girgenti, already known during the ancient times (as it probably already existed before the Angevin period), was restored. It had been built to protect against the Saracen pirates, together with the whole system of the Coastal towers of Sicily. The tower was later again restored by Charles III with the help of Bishop Lorenzo Gioeni. This restoration was completed only in 1763. In 1853, during the government of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies the town obtained independence by becoming chief town of the decurionato under the name of Molo di Girgenti. Then, in 1863, the town changed its name into Porto Empedocle in memory of the Agrigentine philosopher Empedocles.

In 2003, the town changed its official denomination to Porto Empedocle Vigata, after the name of the fictional town where the novels by Andrea Camilleri, Italian writer and native of the town, about detective Inspector Montalbano are placed. However, the decision was revoked in 2009.

The main church is Parrocchia Maria SS. del Buon Consiglio, which is located in the center of the town. The marl Scala dei Turchi is located nearby, on the coast of Realmonte.

title: Porto Empedocle


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takua

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - should be merged - SimonP 14:27, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Takua
Legocruft. Reads like nonsense but seems to be something to do with a character from the Lego series Bionicle. Delete. Hedley 17:28, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Repair or Delete. This one reads worse than the one listed after it to the point where it makes no sense as it stands.  -SocratesJedi | Talk 18:10, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy as no context, near nonsense. A и D я 01D  TALK  EMAIL  20:57, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense.Tobycat 00:58, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. JamesBurns 04:00, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep 'em all or delete 'em all. Let's just try to be consistent here folks - see next discussion. Denni ☯ 18:37, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
 * Merge all the Bionicle stuff into a single article. Kelly Martin 20:28, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:FICT. Radiant_* 10:46, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takua


text:
Nierenberg Prize

The Nierenberg Prize for Science in the Public Interest is given annually by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. It was created through a gift of the family to honor the memory of William Nierenberg. The prize includes a bronze medal and $25,000.

The award is named for William Nierenberg (1919–2000), a renowned national science leader who served Scripps Institution of Oceanography as director from 1965 to 1986. The recipient of numerous awards and honors for professional research and public service, Nierenberg was a leading expert in several fields of underwater research and warfare, and was known for his work in low-energy nuclear physics.

Recipients
Source:

 * 2001: E. O. Wilson
 * 2002: Walter Cronkite
 * 2003: Jane Lubchenco
 * 2004: Dame Jane Goodall
 * 2005: Sir David Attenborough
 * 2006: Gordon Moore
 * 2007: John Craig Venter
 * 2008: James E. Hansen
 * 2009: Richard Dawkins
 * 2010: Ira Flatow
 * 2012: Daniel Pauly
 * 2013: James Cameron
 * 2014: Michael Pollan
 * 2015: Lord Martin Rees
 * 2017: Charles Bolden
 * 2018: Svante Pääbo
 * 2019: Jennifer Doudna
 * 2021: Warren Washington

 * 2022: Jesse H. Ausubel
 * 2023: Katalin Karikó

title: Nierenberg Prize


text:
User:MattWright/sandbox

da:Skabelon:Infoboks Hawaii sv:Mall:Hawaiiöarna zh:Template:Hawaiian Islands

title: User:MattWright/sandbox


text:
Talk:List of browser engines

merge
Since this big is not so big, wouldn't it be a good idea to merge it with layout engine? I'm not bold enough to do it without consent. Pilaf 17:28, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * +1. They are not enough to make an article and layout engines used by some obscure browsers may remain unknown. --FedericoMP 03:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

QHTM
Apparently it's a sort of mini HTML control thingy, but I don't know much about it, other than that it is it's own stand-alone layout engine. No word on standards support, CSS support, ... I don't know - I was hoping to find that out here. Shinobu 04:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

OPERA
Peregrine, Kestrel and Merlin are not Opera rendering engines. They are code names for upcoming desktop versions, all based on the Presto rendering engine.

BlackBerry?
BlackBerry are claiming full CSS2.1 support with their latest version:. That's probably worth adding? Robin (talk) 16:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * this homepage seems to be very strange for me. is there any docs what exactly is supported(or not)? I wiull add bb if i get the data...  mabdul 0=* 12:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:List of browser engines


text:
Donovan (album)

Donovan is the 14th studio album, and sixteenth album overall, from Scottish singer-songwriter Donovan. It was released in the US (Arista AB 4143) in August 1977 and in the UK (RAK SRAK 528) with a different track order in October 1977.

Background
In 1976, Donovan's record contract with Epic Records came to an end with Slow Down World. The album had only achieved limited chart success, and his contract was not renewed. Donovan's old record producer Mickie Most had launched Rak Records in the UK in 1969 and Donovan and Most teamed up to record Donovan's next album on Rak Records in 1977. Arista Records picked up the distribution rights in the US.

In a distinct change from Slow Down World, the songs on Donovan were an attempt to reach mass audiences again. The songs feature a contemporary sound and, with the exception of "Maya's Dance", generally avoid the gentle balladry of Donovan's previous work. Despite these measures, Donovan failed to chart in both the US and UK, and signalled the end of Donovan's attempts to reach a mainstream audience. He would not release another original album in the United States until 1984.

Reissues

 * On 27 March 2000, Beat Goes On Records released the US version Donovan (BGOCD375) in the UK on CD. This marked the first time the album was released on CD.

Track listing
All tracks by Donovan Leitch.

Side one

 * 1) "Local Boy Chops Wood" – 3:02
 * 2) "Astral Angel" – 4:32
 * 3) "The Light" – 4:09
 * 4) "Dare to Be Different" – 3:50
 * 5) "Brave New World" – 4:48

Side two

 * 1) "Lady of the Stars" – 3:02
 * 2) "International Man" – 3:59
 * 3) "Sing My Song" – 3:05
 * 4) "Maya's Dance" – 3:38
 * 5) "Kalifornia Kiddies" – 3:46

Side one

 * 1) "Brave New World" – 4:58
 * 2) "Astral Angel" – 4:32
 * 3) "Local Boy Chops Wood" – 3:02
 * 4) "Kalifornia Kiddies" – 3:46
 * 5) "The International Man" – 3:59

Side two

 * 1) "The Light" – 4:09
 * 2) "Sing My Song" – 3:05
 * 3) "Lady of the Stars" – 3:02
 * 4) "Maya's Dance" – 3:38
 * 5) "Dare to Be Different" – 3:50

Personnel

 * Colin Allen – drums
 * Chris Blair – mastering
 * John Cameron – horn arrangements, string arrangements
 * Donovan – guitar, harmonica, vocals
 * Isaac Guillory – guitar
 * Patrick Halling – violin
 * Doug Hopkins – engineer
 * Ronnie Leahy – keyboards
 * Gered Mankowitz – photography
 * Chris Norman – background vocals
 * Alan Silson – background vocals
 * Nick South – bass
 * Tim Summerhayes – engineer
 * Wolfgang Thierbach – engineer
 * Terry Uttley – background vocals
 * Charlie Watts – mastering

title: Donovan (album)


text:
Systems Applications Products audit

A Systems Applications Products audit is an audit of a computer system from SAP to check its security and data integrity. SAP is the acronym for Systems Applications Products. It is a system that provides users with a soft real-time business application. It contains a user interface and is considered very flexible. In an SAP audit, the two main areas of concern are security and data integrity.

Overview
Systems, Applications, Products in Data Processing, or SAP, was originally introduced in the 1980s as SAP R/2, which was a system that provided users with a soft real-time business application that could be used in multiple currencies and languages. As client–server systems began to be introduced, SAP brought out a server-based version of their software called SAP R/3, henceforth referred to as SAP, which was launched in 1992. SAP also developed a graphical user interface or GUI.

For the next 12 years, SAP dominated the large business applications market. It was successful primarily because it was flexible. Because SAP was a modular system (meaning that the various functions provided by it could be purchased piecemeal) it was a versatile system. A company could simply purchase modules that they wanted and customize the processes to match the company's business model. SAP's flexibility, while one of its greatest strengths is also one of its greatest weaknesses that leads to the SAP audit.

There are three main enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems used in today's larger businesses: SAP, Oracle, and PeopleSoft. ERPs are specifically designed to help with the accounting function and the control over various other aspects of the company's business such as sales, delivery, production, human resources, and inventory management. Despite the benefits of ERPs, there are many potential pitfalls that companies who turn to ERPs occasionally fall into.

Segregation of duties
Security is the first and foremost concern in any SAP audit. There should be proper segregation of duties and access controls, which is paramount to establishing the integrity of the controls for the system. When a company first receives SAP, it almost lacks all security measures. When implementing SAP a company must go through an extensive process of outlining their processes and then building their system security from the ground up to ensure proper segregation of duties and proper access. Proper profile design and avoidance of redundant user IDs and superuser access will be important in all phases of operation. Along with this comes the importance of ensuring restricted access to terminals, servers, and the data center to prevent tampering. Because each company will have different modules each company's security structure will be distinctly different.

A typical example from SAP will be Creating a Vendor and also being able to pay an invoice. The Create a Vendor Transaction is XK01 and the Pay invoice transaction is FB60. If the User or Role in SAP has those two transactions then it will create a SOD Risk.

With security, it all starts at the beginning with the proper design and implementation of security and access measures for employees. For new employees, it is important that their access is set up properly and that future access granted has proper approval. After the system has been implemented the control over system changes and the approval process required for it is vital to ensure the continued security and functionality of the system. Without proper security measures in place from start to finish there will be a material weakness in the controls of the system because of this there will likely be some level of fraud as well.

Through security, you can monitor who has access to what data and processes and ensure that there is sufficient segregation of duties to prevent someone from perpetrating fraud. One of the major advantages of SAP is that it can be programmed to perform various audit functions for you. One of the most important of those is for reviewing user access and using the system to cross-check based on an access matrix to ensure that proper segregation is in place so a person with payment request access does not also have access to create a vendor.

System changes
After ensuring that security is set up to ensure proper segregation of duties the next area of concern surrounding security is with regards to system changes. All companies should have three different systems: the development system, the test system, and the production system. All changes to production will need to be run through an approval process and be tested to ensure that they will function properly when introduced into the production system. The security around who can authorize a change and who can pull that change through into production is paramount to ensuring the security and integrity of the system. A review of this process and the people involved with it will be key to the audit of the system.

The goal of auditing the access, steps and procedures for system updates is to ensure proper controls over change management of the system and to ensure that proper testing and authorization procedures are being used.

Data integrity issues
Because SAP integrates data from legacy systems it is important to ensure that the mapping of the interaction between the legacy systems and SAP is thorough and complete. Without that, any data received from SAP would be suspect. It is also important that proper backups of the database be maintained along with an up-to-date and practiced disaster recovery plan to ensure continuity after a disaster. A thorough review of these plans along with the mapping of system interfaces will be important in this phase of the audit. However, because all SAP data are stored on inter-related tables users with certain security can change them. The output must be verified to ensure accuracy. SAP does provide some basic audit programs to assist with the review of data to ensure that it is processing properly. It is also customizable so that a user can create a program to audit a specific function.

The monitoring of change management, the moving of updates to the system from the development stage is one of the key elements of this particular concern. Because of this, review of the process of review and pull through to production needs to be a high priority.

Controls
Controls around the system need to be reviewed, especially around the accounts payable and accounts receivable sub ledgers. Auditors must perform or review reconciliations between SAP and external information such as bank reconciliation and A/P statement reconciliation. They must review cost center and responsibility accounting, management review and budgetary control and the route of authorization for non-routine transactions.

The audit review should include a review of validation of data that is input in certain transactions, the design of ABAP statements and their authority checks matching documents prior to closing. Also, with regard to the master file control there must be an independent review of master file changes and creation of transactional responsibilities to identify any redundant master files.

When it comes to data integrity the primary concerns are the integration of data from the legacy systems and then ensuring that data being input into the system for processing has been properly approved and is accompanied by the proper documentation. Through reviewing these aspects of the processing from implementation through to production you can gain reasonable confidence that the controls surrounding the data are sufficient and that the data are likely free of material error. The use of the built in audit functions will greatly assist with this process and the ability to create your own audit programs will allow you to customize the work to the company you are working with.

Control risks
The two major control risks that need to be monitored with SAP are security and data integrity. To ensure that both are sufficient it is important that both be properly outlined and developed during implementation. User profiles must be designed properly and access must be sufficiently segregated to minimize the chance of fraud. Use of the SAP audit functions to cross check the user access with the matrix of allowable accesses is the quickest and easiest way to ensure that duties and access are properly segregated. New and old users must be entered and removed promptly and avoidance and monitoring of any super user access is imperative. Review of the access to upload and pull through changes to production and review of the associated authorization process is important from both a security and data integrity point of view.

To further ensure data integrity it is important that proper documentation be reviewed along with confirmation of any external data available either through a legacy system or through a third party. This is important with regard to certain sensitive accounts, such as accounts payable. Review of controls around budgets and management review and also review of authorization for non-routine transactions and physical access will be imperative to ensuring the accuracy of the data input and output from the system. The use of and development of tools within SAP will help accelerate this process and help to ensure that it is accurate. These are the two most vital parts to any SAP audit and successful review of them should allow you to determine the adequacy of control around the SAP system and access to it to determine whether or not there are any material deficiencies with the systems control.

title: Systems Applications Products audit


text:
Talk:Buick Riviera

Spelling
I incline to reject the accented European spelling of coupe as added in the last edit. The word is never spelled or pronounced that way in the U.S., and the Riviera had no significant presence abroad. Barring good arguments to the contrary, I'll probably revert. RivGuySC 17:29, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * I agree - such spelling is out of place in a U.S. model. --SFoskett 00:51, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

-

ArgentLA's last revisions have done a good bit to clean up and organize the article, but I have a couple of doubts. I don't think the '71-'76 run constitues two generations. The only major difference that occured in '74 was the substitution of the notchback roof for the boat-tail. And I'm not sure that the '86 should be said to share the Regal chassis. The Regal didn't go front-drive until '88. RivGuySC 17:46, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

The infobox is good, but there's some confusion as to the competition. I don't think the Cougar is a good choice--it was either a pony car or an intermediate personal luxury car, not in either case competitive with the fullsize Riviera. The Chrysler LeBaron was also too small. There were really ever only five fullsize PLC's - Thunderbird (before '77), Riviera, Toronado, Eldorado, and Mark. Those are what I think should go in the box. RivGuySC 23:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Third/Fourth Generation?
As the article even admits, the Riviera was only reskinned from its "boattail" 1973 look to its notchback look for 1974. That same body shell was used, with the same wheelbase, and some of the front sheetmetal. If the "seventh generation" Riviera remains such after its 1989 update (as it should), the 1974-76 model should be considered as part of the "third generation". If no one objects, I'll make the change. Rhettro76 21:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the loss of the boattail design was a HUGE change. Visually, the '73 and '74 are more different than some other vehicles' two generations. I think they should remain separate. --Sable232 00:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I would agree that it was a notable change, and it should be noted. And maybe it's just me, but calling it a different "generation" when all of the mechanicals and many of the body panels carried over is overstating things a bit. Maybe if it was called Series II or Mark II or version II of its third generation would be more accurate. In reality, the changes from 1988 to 89 were just as extensive. Thoughts? Rhettro76 18:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Origins of the personal luxury car
This section has some serious factual and stylistic errors. Corporations don't "feel" anything. GM may have identified a market for a personal luxury car in the 1950's, but it didn't feel anything. Also in the 1950's the Ford Thunderbird was a two door, two place roadster more in the league of the Corvette of the same era. The whole section should either be rewritten with appropriate references or scrapped as a duplication of the Wiki article on Personal Luxury Cars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inkpeninmd (talk • contribs) 22:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Buick Riviera


text:
Michigan Flight Museum

The Michigan Flight Museum, formerly known as the Yankee Air Museum, is an aviation museum located at Willow Run Airport in Van Buren Township, Michigan. The museum has a small fleet of flying aircraft and a collection of static display aircraft outdoors.

History
The Yankee Air Force Inc. was founded in 1981 to pursue these goals:
 * To preserve a part of Michigan's extensive aviation history.
 * To acquire one of the original USAAF hangars and restore it to its original condition.
 * To obtain a B-24 Liberator built at the Ford Willow Run plant, site of the museum.

The Yankee Air Force previously operated four divisions in addition to its home base:
 * Saginaw Valley at Saginaw County H.W. Browne Airport in Michigan
 * Wurtsmith Division at Wurtsmith Air Force Base in Michigan
 * Northeast Division at Essex County Airport in New Jersey
 * Florida Division in Florida

2004 fire
On the night of October 9, 2004, the Yankee Air Museum's hangar on the northeast side of Willow Run Airport (KYIP) burned down. The B-17, B-25 and C-47 were saved through heroic efforts by museum volunteers. The Stinson was at another hangar. Everything else inside the hangar was destroyed, including the original prototype North American YOV-10A Bronco, Waco CG-4A Glider, a former Thunderbirds Republic F-105, Aero L-39, Link Trainer, artifacts, spare parts, tools, and the museum's library.

Rebuilding plans were underway within days and the museum's fundraising arm, the Michigan Aerospace Foundation, worked to replace the lost facility with a new, bigger, state-of-the-art aviation museum and aerospace facility. Ground was broken for a new museum building in April 2007. In 2008, the museum changed from a membership club to a director-driven organization with an 11-member board.

In 2009, the museum purchased a building from the Michigan Institute of Aviation and Technology (MIAT), on D Street to the east of the airfield, intending it as the new home of the museum collection.

In summer 2010, the museum opened the David and Andrea Robertson Education Center in a 1938 schoolhouse that had been moved from another part of the Willow Run complex. This had been the officers' club for the USAAF detachments stationed at Willow Run during the war, and was apparently the schoolhouse for the boys living at Henry Ford's Willow Run Farm (a social experiment that used the Willow Run site in 1939 and 1940 before the airfield and industrial complex were ever conceived).

The museum reopened to the public on October 10, 2010, six years to the day after the fire. This allowed the museum to vacate Hangar Two, which was condemned by the Wayne County Airport Authority.

The museum became a Smithsonian Affiliate in July 2011.

Move to Willow Run bomber plant
In April 2013, Yankee Air Museum and RACER Trust, owner of the former General Motors Willow Run plant, announced a plan for Yankee Air Museum to acquire a 175000 sqft portion of the factory, contingent upon the museum raising the funds necessary to preserve and secure their proposed portion of the facility. The museum would consolidate operations scattered on various parcels at Willow Run Airport into the 1941 landmark, designed by Albert Kahn, with the trust seeking to clear the remainder of the plant for redevelopment. The plant was used during World War II to manufacture B-24 bombers.

The campaign to save a portion of Willow Run for the Yankee Air Museum is called SaveTheBomberPlant.org, and is centered on a fundraising website by the same name.

After extending the fundraising deadline to Oct. 1, and then to Nov. 1, 2013, on October 26, 2013, RACER Trust and the Yankee Air Museum again reached a new, and final, deadline extension agreement. The final deadline to raise the funds necessary to preserve a portion of the Willow Run plant for the Yankee Air Museum was May 1, 2014.

At the time of the May 1, 2014 deadline, the Yankee Air Museum had raised over $7 million of its original $8 million fundraising goal, which was enough to enable the trust to move forward and sign a purchase agreement with Yankee, with the actual purchase expected to be finalized in late summer or fall of 2014. The majority of the $8 million fundraising goal reflects separation costs to make the preserved portion of the plant viable as a standalone structure.

The remaining portion of the Willow Run complex, which includes over 95% of the historic building, has been sold to Walbridge, Inc., for redevelopment as a connected vehicle research and test facility. RACER Trust will demolish this portion of the building prior to turning the property over to Walbridge. Preparations for demolition of Willow Run Assembly facility, with the exception of the portion that the Yankee Air Museum is campaigning to save, were well underway as of August 2014, with much of the building already demolished.

In October 2014 the museum announced that it is changing its name to the National Museum of Aviation and Technology at Historic Willow Run.

With the planned decommissioning of Hangar 1, the museum was forced to find a new home for its flying collection. After initially considering a location adjacent to the Bomber Plant hangars, a site on the east side of the airport was selected for the Roush Aeronautics Center.

Name change
The museum changed its name to Michigan Flight Museum in May 2024. The following month it announced the sale of its B-17.

Collection
The Museum's Collections & Exhibits building covers 47000 sqft of floor space and houses permanent and rotating aviation and historical displays, restoration projects, a retail store and a movie theatre that is available to the public. It is also home to museum staff and volunteers and has meeting rooms and banquet facilities for rent, machine shops and storage space for the museum collection. An outside area next to the museum is the new home of the air park.

From 2007 until August 2011, the Yankee Air Museum's flyable aircraft were hangared at the Township Airport at Grosse Ile, Michigan.

Airworthy

 * North American B-25D Mitchell 43-3634 Rosie's Reply (formerly Yankee Warrior) – It flew 8 combat missions over Italy.
 * Douglas TC-47D Skytrain 44-76716 "Hairless Joe"
 * WACO Classic Aircraft YMF-5C F5C-049
 * Bell UH-1 Iroquois "Greyhound" 66-01126
 * Ford 4-AT-B Trimotor 42

Aircraft on display
• Boeing B-52D Stratofortress 55-0677

• SPAD S.XIII 4523 – Replica

• Stinson Reliant I FB724

• Antonov An-2R 1G 211-41

• Cessna O-2 Skymaster 67-21416

• Consolidated PB4Y-2G Privateer, 59876

• De Havilland Canada DHC-4 Caribou 2

• Douglas A-4C Skyhawk 148543

• Douglas SBD-3 Dauntless 06626

• Lockheed EC-121K Warning Star 141311

• Lockheed P2V-7 Neptune 140443

•

• Lockheed T-33B 58-0492

• Martin RB-57A Canberra 52-1426

• McDonnell NF-101B Voodoo 56-0235

• McDonnell Douglas F-4C Phantom II 63-7555

• McDonnell Douglas F/A-18C Hornet

• North American F-86L Sabre 53-1060

• North American F-100C Super Sabre 54-1785

• Republic F-84F Thunderstreak 51-9501

• Republic RF-84F Thunderflash 52-7421

Gliders
• Franklin PS-2

• Schweizer TG-3 42-52948

• LET L-13 Blaník

title: Michigan Flight Museum


text:
Alexander Hume-Campbell, 2nd Earl of Marchmont

Alexander Hume-Campbell, 2nd Earl of Marchmont (1675 – 27 February 1740), was a Scottish nobleman, politician and judge.

Life
The third but eldest surviving son of Patrick Hume, 1st Earl of Marchmont, by his spouse Grisel (d.1703), daughter of Sir Thomas Ker of Cavers, he assumed the additional surname of Campbell upon his marriage in 1697 with Margaret (d. 1722), daughter and heiress of Sir George Campbell of Cessnock, Ayrshire.

He studied law at Utrecht University and became an advocate in 1696. He was appointed to the Court of Session in 1704 with the judicial title Lord Cessnock, and served there until 1714.

He was a Commissioner to the Parliament of Scotland for Berwickshire in 1706, and was a supporter of the Union with England. He was Lord Clerk Register from 1716 to 1733.

He was ambassador to Denmark from 1715 to 1721, and to the Congress at Cambray in 1722.

He succeeded his father to the earldom in 1724, and was a Scottish representative peer from 1727 to 1734.

Alexander served as one of the founding governors of Britain's first childcare charity, the Foundling Hospital, which received its royal charter in 1739.


text:
Talk:Gestational age

ways to estimate
I dont think you understand this list. These are ways to judge the gestational age of a newborn baby that have been widely used in medical practice in the last 50 years. I do not understand how a woman's ability to guess when she might be ovulating makes it possible to judge a gestational age many months later to the degree that simply knowing the LMP provides. At any rate, it has not been widely used. Where did you get this? alteripse 17:31, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * I got this from a Creighton-model NFP instructor, who did a great job of calculating the birthday of my second child. Time of ovulation will vary, and commonly there can be multiple ovulations within a single cycle. Assuming just one ovulation though, the timing is more closely related to the following period. The preceding period has little to do with it; using the preceding period is thus a doubly-crude way to estimate. Effectively you are estimating the time of the period that didn't arrive and then going back from there. Periods can be quite irregular for some women, causing the last-cycle method to be off by weeks. AlbertCahalan 18:05, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * In any case, this method is in use and it is quite accurate. You really shouldn't be so quick to revert. That's not nice behavior. AlbertCahalan 18:05, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * To clarify a bit: Observation of cervical mucous will let you know ovulation to within a couple days. Ovulation happens at a relatively fixed offset from the following period, though accuracy is probably already worse than the cervical mucous observations. Problem is, that period is the one that never happened. You'll have to guess. You're not doing too bad if the woman has standard-sized periods like clockwork, but who ever has that? Lots of women have 3-week and 5-week periods, sometimes even longer. Many women have irregular periods. Ovulation does not occur at a very predictable time from the previous period. (thus making cervical mucous observations far more accurate for pregnancy control -- temperature works OK too) AlbertCahalan 18:15, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Your method is basically a way to know probable date of conception. I suppose we could turn this article into a list of unusual ways for a mother to know when a baby was conceived (i.e., the date father was home on leave, or the date of the credit card charge for the fancy dinner after which, or the date of the police report of the rape, or the date of the ovulation induction injection, or the date of the artificial insemination, etc...), but I think it would be a better article if we don't. In actual practice, in the middle of a pregnancy or when a baby is born, the common ways that gestational age is estimated or corroborated are by LMP, u/s, or maturational exam, none of which are perfect. Apples and oranges. Sorry you thought it was rude, that was why I went to the talk page second time. alteripse 18:34, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * Well, you already covered "date father was home on leave" and so on. That's the first and obvious thing, the time of sexual intercourse. Alone, that says nothing unless the mother only ever had sex once. So some idea of ovulation should be used. The date of last period is one very common and crude way to narrow this down. Many women can't do any better, and some don't even track periods well. Look at this chart though. Clearly, using the last period is a poor way to guess. You could be off by weeks! Ultrasound seems to be about as bad as LMP. Cervical mucous observations alone will pin down ovulation to a couple days generally, which would be the accuracy if unfertilized eggs didn't live as long as they do. Temperature might be accurate too. AlbertCahalan 19:01, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm not trying to be rude, but you are missing the point: once the probable date of conception is known by any method, estimating gestational age is trivial. Your method is one of an infinite number of ways a woman might know when she got pregnant. All of them are equivalent to "mother's knowledge of date of conception" and perhaps we should change item 1 in the list to say "probable date of conception" instead of "probable date of intercourse". Would you then feel that your method was included? The whole point of the initial version of the list was that a woman often does not know exactly when she conceived. There are then 3 commonly used ways of guessing how far along the pregnancy is, or how mature the fetus or newborn is: LMP, u/s, exam of infant. While each is obviously imperfect and has sources of error, these are still the commonly used ways of judging gest age if a woman doesn't know when she got pregnant. Do you get it now? alteripse 19:26, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * If you want to organize the list that way, then u/s is equivalent to examination. You could do like this:
 * date of conception
 * date of sexual intercourse
 * ovulation estimate
 * by temperature
 * by cervical mucous
 * by date of last period
 * observation of baby
 * by ultrasound
 * early and tolerably accurate
 * late and very inaccurate
 * after baby is born
 * date bounded by implantation
 * pregnancy test
 * implantation bleeding
 * IVF
 * One could argue that all methods are a way to estimate the date of conception though. That's really what gestational age is all about. So that leaves top-level items as follows:
 * date of insemination (police report, credit card bill, wedding day...)
 * ovulation estimate (temperature, mucous, last period...)
 * observation of baby (before or after birth)
 * implantation (pregnancy test, bleeding...)
 * IVF
 * Perhaps each of these should be a section.
 * AlbertCahalan 20:01, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gestational age vs. LMP
I have always read that gestational age is the age from conception (which this article states), and thus is, on average, two weeks shorter than the pregnancy length from last menstrual period (LMP). This article also states that an average pregnancy has a gestation of 40 weeks - I thought this was the average time from LMP, making the actual gestational period 38 weeks?

 * Looks like someone went ahead and made that distinction, changing the gestational period to 38 weeks. I just changed the parenthetical note from 280 days to 260 days, accordingly.  Unfortunately though, this leaves the chart presented in the article mismatched with the actual article test, since the chart seems to be using LMP for its "gestational age".  Mwelch 22:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

This article is the only place I can find Gestational Age defined as age from conception:

NIH-http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002367.htm "Gestational age is the time measured from the first day of the woman's last menstrual cycle to the current date and is measured in weeks. A pregnancy of normal gestation is approximately 40 weeks, with a normal range of 38 to 42 weeks."

WebMD--i http://www.webmd.com/hw/health_guide_atoz/tn5878.asp "Gestational age is the number of weeks and days a fetus has developed since the beginning of the pregnancy, or gestation. A pregnancy is formally considered as beginning on the first day of the mother's last menstrual period (LMP)."

American Pregnancy Association-http://www.americanpregnancy.org/duringpregnancy/calculatingdates.html "Gestational age, or the age of the baby, is calculated from the first day of the mother's last menstrual period."

I'm not an expert by any means so I won't change the actual article but I am interested in the discrepancy.

In fact, the wikipedia page on pregnancy doesn't even define gestational age this way

 * That's interesting. As far as I am aware, gestational age is the only term that can be used when LMP is known to be inaccurate - the woman has unusally long or short cycles, for example, or conceived before her first post-partum menstruation.  I have also seen the "LMP minus two weeks" definition of gestational age used on pro-life sites, to make more developed-looking embryos/fetuses sound younger than they actually are. And number of weeks and days a fetus has developed since the beginning of the pregnancy is pretty ambiguous, see Beginning of pregnancy controversy.

 * But you appear to be right, in that it is also used interchangably with LMP. So there are two definitions, and the article needs to be changed to reflect that. Feel free to do so. Lyrl 21:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Late reply, but this is a US-centric definition. Canada counts GA from fertilization. Europe either fertilization or implantation, not sure yet. — kwami (talk) 02:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

3rd sentence, conceptional age and CFN
I propose removing the 3rd sentence. The source itself says "The term "conceptual age" is incorrect and should not be used," and goes on to say the situation where 'conception' or implantation is known is assisted fertilization. In the US, IVF only accounts for 1% of births. This sentence is confusing and unnecessary. Anyway, normally it is the other way around: you can estimate the date of fertilization and implantation based on the LMP. I'd say we should replace the sentence with "Gestational age is approximately 2 weeks older than when fertilization took place". -Andrew c 02:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

 * There are more than 28,000 Google hits for "conceptional age". The cited article merely says that the term “conceptional age” should not be used in clinical pediatrics.  It doesn’t say the term should never be used anywhere.  As we all know, the conceptional age (or age from conception or fertilization) is very very often used.  There's absolutely no harm in explaining that this age is offset two weeks from the "geatational" or "menstrual" age, and in fact this explanation is very useful.  That's why the cited article does so.Ferrylodge 02:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

 * IVF isn't the only or most common method of assisted reproduction - women on Clomid, injectables, and/or doing IUI will frequently be monitored by ultrasound. Ovulation predictor kits are used by large numbers of women.  Not sure how common using fertility awareness is to acheive pregnancy (certainly more common than the 0.2% of Americans who use it to avoid pregnancy). Combined, I believe these different practices provide a significant number of women with an estimated date of fertilization other than (and more accurate than) the LMP.  So, to me, explaining that gestational age is calculated beginning two weeks prior to fertilization is relevant.  Though I do see (and agree with) the objection to the current wording. I'll think about alternative wording. Lyrl  Talk C 03:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

 * How about: "Gestational age is approximately 2 weeks older than conceptional age"?

 * Incidentally, the term "fetal age" gets about 89,000 Google hits, and the term "developmental age" gets around 240,000 hits. Conceptional age, and developmental age, and fetal age, and fertilization age, are all pretty much synonymous.  My primary concern is that this article should not leave the impression that prenatal age is only measured from two weeks prior to conception, when in fact it's very often measured from fertilization.Ferrylodge 03:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

 * I like your proposed wording. I think it is important to mention both concepts, and because both concepts are used. The CFN citation believes that it can get very confusing with the 2 week difference, so they prefer to use the LMP gestational age always in obstetrics. But again that is just one source, in the Embryology text we covered in another article (I believe it was the beginning of pregnancy controversy article) they prefer to use developmental age presumably because the focus isn't on the person who is pregnant, but instead on the thing actually developing. Anyway, thank you for considering the changes and suggesting something workable!-Andrew c 16:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Some changes
After some discussion with two MD's, I corrected the three following points because I think they are against what is said in the references mentioned. (I think it's important to note that this is only a definition, not realy an "age".)
 * 1. The references clearly state that gestational age IS NOT the "age of an embryo or fetus (or newborn infant)", but the time elapsed since the first day of the last menstrual period. So it’s always longer then that age (more or less two weeks).
 * 2. The developmental age results from the doctor’s evaluation of the development of the new born and it IS NOT calculated as two weeks less than the gestational age. ( the example given in is about a premature baby that could be evaluated as having a development of 38 weeks instead of 36 weeks of gestational age-it was an example not a formula).
 * 3. I never heard of any controversy as to what is "gestational age" and it’s clear for me that this "age" is always longer then the time of pregnancy (either defined as time of the  implantation or the time of fertilization(the formation of a viable zygote)). So I think that it would be unnecessary to make any reference inn this article about that controversy. However I only rephrased it to reflect this idea. AntoniusJ 13:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

 * Gestational age... is the time elapsed between the first day of the last normal menstrual period and the day of delivery.
 * First, not if a woman ovulated on day 42 of her menstrual cycle. I believe some qualifier needs to be put on this statement.
 * Second, if I understand correctly, gestational age is commonly used to measure pregnancy length during pregnancy. A fetus can have a gestational age of 12 weeks without having been miscarried, right? Lyrl  Talk C 21:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

 * This article defines the length of a full-term human pregnancy. While it may be obvious to Antonius that pregnancy begins on a woman's first day of menstrual bleeding, I'm not convinced this is obvious to everybody.  I think it is worth noting that this article uses menstruation as the marker of pregnancy onset, to distinguish from pregnancy beginning at fertilization which is also a common belief. Lyrl  Talk C 14:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

 * AntoniusJ, you say that "gestational age IS NOT the age of an embryo or fetus." I agree. What type of age would you call the age of an embryo or fetus?  There are several possibilities (e.g. fertilization age, conceptional age, fetal age, and developmental age).  At least one of those possibilities ought to be mentioned in the article. As explained above, my primary concern is that this article should not leave the impression that age is only measured from two weeks prior to conception.  As Andrew C. mentioned above, "it is important to mention both concepts."  Therefore, unless you object, I will revise the article to clarify that age of the embryo or fetus (e.g. fertilization age or developmental age) is distinct from (and should not be confused with) gestational age.Ferrylodge 19:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I still think the article begins with an error.
 * 1- I thought it was clear for all that gestational age is always greater than the age of the fetus(More or less two weeks). That is the question. To state that it is the age of the fetus is clearly wrong(Please show me some scientific source that says the contrary).Here [] you'll see that the age of the fetus is what they call "Gestation" and they distinguish it from "Gestational age".
 * 2-The beginning of pregnancy is another question. I personally doubt that the pregnancy begins when gestation age begins to be counted.(as far as I know gestation age is used just because it is more “easy” to know exactly when it started) . But I think the question of when pregnancy begins as nothing to do with this definition.
 * 3- Developmental age-If you see instead of “Free dicionaray” you’ll see that “This may not match the calendar gestational age. For example, an infant born with a gestational age of 36 weeks may actually have a developmental gestational age of 38 weeks, and therefore behave more like a full-term infant than a premature infant.”AntoniusJ 02:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

 * AntoniusJ, it may be helpful for people following this discussion to take note that your two links are the same item. Also, let's excerpt the relevant parts of that item:

 * "Gestation is the period of time between conception and birth, during which the fetus grows and develops inside its mother's uterus. Gestational age is the time measured from the first day of the woman's last menstrual cycle to the current date. It is measured in weeks. A pregnancy of normal gestation is approximately 40 weeks, with a normal range of 38 to 42 weeks.  Infants born before 37 weeks are considered premature. Infants born after 42 weeks are considered postmature. This gestational maturity rating is measured by the Ballard scale or Dubowitz exam.  Strictly speaking, the gestational age of a fetus or infant is a measurement of time inside of the uterus. Gestational age can be determined before the baby is born or at its birth.  Prior to birth, growth is determined with ultrasound by measuring the diameter of the head and comparing the head circumference and the abdominal circumference.  Following birth, assessing an infant's weight, length, head circumference, condition of skin and hair, reflexes, muscle tone, posture, and vital signs can provide a 'developmental' gestational age. This may not match the calendar gestational age. For example, an infant born with a gestational age of 36 weeks may actually have a developmental gestational age of 38 weeks, and therefore behave more like a full-term infant than a premature infant.  Determination of gestational age is important, because it provides valuable information regarding expected or potential problems and directly affects the medical treatment plan for the baby."

 * I have put in bold italics the part that you quoted. It seems to me that KillerChihuahua has interpreted this correctly.  Please note that the present article mentions "fertilization age" rather than "developmental age".  "Gestation" is the whole period of time from conception to birth.  In contrast, "gestational age" is the time that has elapsed since the first day of a woman's last menstrual cycle.  And, "fertilization age" is the time that has elapsed since fertilization.  The concept of "developmental age" seems to be a bit fuzzier, and therefore it has been (wisely) left out of the article. The current article says that the gestational age is always greater than the fertilization age.  So, what's the problem?Ferrylodge 02:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

 * No problem at all. Now I think the article it's better than it was before, although a little bit confuse("the age of a foetus since the LMP"-in the LMP the foetus doesn't exists yet-everybody agrees on that ). ( and is there anything against calling the same link twice in two different phrases ? ) AntoniusJ 00:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

 * I assume you're referring to the redundant wikilink to fetus. I've just fixed that.  Thx.Ferrylodge 17:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Corrected gestational age?
I like the intro quite a bit now. Nice work to everyone who has been contributing.

My remaining concern is with the section The gestational age of an individual infant can be more accurately estimated from:, which contradicts the opening statement that gestational age is always calculated from LMP. Maybe that second section needs to be edited to talk about "adjusting" gestational age, instead of "more accurately estimating"? I'm not confident enough in how the term is used medically to make the edits myself. Lyrl Talk C 00:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the last sentence: "The gestational age of children conceived by in vitro fertilization is known to the hour" Don't you mean the developmental age? since the LMP would be known "to the hour" in both cases or, not known in the "in-vitro" case if the patient has hormonal or other cause for menstrual irregularities (cause of infertility) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.21.15.115 (talk • contribs).

Two definitions of gestational age
There are two definitions of "gestational age" in common use:

 * Stedman's Online Medical Dictionary, 27th Edition says "n. 1. in embryology, the age of a conceptus expressed in elapsed time since conception; 2. in obstetrics, the developmental age of a fetus, usually based on the presumed first day of the last normal menstrual period."

Stedman's is the best I've found.

Unfortunately, the current Wikipedia article gives only the obstetricians' definition. The embryologists' definition, which counts gestational age as the age from conception/fertilization, is at least as commonly used.

Worse yet, the current Wikipedia article says the embryologists' definition is wrong: "The gestational age should not be confused with the fertilization age..."

Here are some more online dictionary definitions. Some use the obstetricians' definition, more use the embryologists' definition, and some confuse the two:

 * Dictionary.com says "n. the age of an embryo counting from the time of fertilization [syn: fetal age]"

 * Rhyme Zone dictionary says "n. the age of an embryo counting from the time of fertilization"

 * FreeDictionary.org says "n. the age of an embryo counting from the time of fertilization; [syn: fetal age, fertilization age, gestational age]"

 * Look Way Up dictionary says "n. the age of an embryo counting from the time of fertilization. More..."

 * The British On-line Medical Dictionary says " Foetal age of a newborn, calculated from the number of completed weeks since the first day of the mother's last menstrual period to the date of birth."

 * The Free Dictionary (main page) says "n. the age of an embryo counting from the time of fertilization. fertilization age, fetal age"

 * The Free Dictionary (medical dictionary page) says "n. the age of a fetus or newborn, usually expressed in weeks dating from the first day of the mother's last menstrual period."

 * Medline is just a mess. It confuses the two definitions, thus effectively defining conception as the first day of the mother's last menstrual period!  "Gestation is the period of time between conception and birth during which the fetus grows and develops inside the mother's womb.  Gestational age is the time measured from the first day of the woman's last menstrual cycle to the current date.  It is measured in weeks.  A pregnancy of normal gestation is approximately 40 weeks, with a normal range of 38 to 42 weeks..."

 * Parents' Common Sense Encyclopedia says "The gestational age of a newborn is the length of his or her gestation up to delivery"

The bottom line is that if an obstetrician uses the term "gestational age" he probably means from LMP, but most others use the term as a synonym for fertilization age. This article needs to be fixed to reflect the fact that there are actually two different definitions in common use. NCdave (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Beg to differ re "in common use" - I can promise you every pregnant woman in UK, US, Canada, Australia etc has their gestational status based on time from LMP (or equivalent date if menstrual cycle significantly different from 28-days or in case IVF etc). As such, all of us were born with expected dates calculated 40 weeks after our mother's LMPs and this is overwhelmingly the commonest use. Now I do not dispute one can refer to a fetus by number of weeks of development since fertilisation, but this is not the commonest system used and is therefore a lesser used system, not withstanding dictionairies not being precise or acurate in their descriptions of scientific terminology (go look up baby, neonate, infant or even human for idiosyncratic definitions). Likewise any reports on definitions of age of viability are stated in gestational age from LMP, and restrictions in the UK on permitted abortions are defined as before 24 weeks from the LMP. David Ruben Talk 17:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

 * I've adjusted the article to reflect the two definitions, and listed the obstetrics definition first. I also added several additional references.  What do you think of it?  NCdave (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

 * When you talk about a "pregnant woman's gestational status" the context is human obstetrics, not embryology.

 * Most people thinks that the definition of a term used in their context of interest, or their field, is the definition. For another example, try talking to people in various fields about the word "organic."  A chemist or physicist will tell you that it simply means a compound containing carbon & hydrogen.  A biologist will tell you that it means something derived from a living organism.  A farmer or grocer will tell you that it refers to a food which was produced without the aid of pesticides or commercial fertilizers.  Many of them will tell you in all seriousness that their definition is the correct definition, and the other definitions (if they've heard of them at all) represent misuse of the term.  NCdave (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

 * I agree on your points, although I think the assumption can safely be had that wikipedia articles as a default are most likely be interpreted with respect to us humans (hence myocardial infarction will describe as symptoms referred pain into left arm rather than left forlimb). Hence half the world's population (of humans) experience of gestation will involve antenatal care/services... That said, your edit is well written, clear and nicely phrased - well done :-) David Ruben Talk 01:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

odd infobar figure
This article is about "gestation age", the infobar contains a figure with definitions for "Birth weight and gestational age", the definitions all correspond to different birth weights. This kind of information is not really specifically about "gestational age", and is kind of distracting. Is there a better figure which sums up "gestational age" (especially since there are so many different definitions associated with "gestational age") and does NOT include birth weights? Or should the article focus on (and be retitled to) "gestational age and birth weight"? --74.179.122.10 (talk) 16:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gestational age. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131106111500/http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/ACOG_Departments/Patient_Safety_and_Quality_Improvement/~/media/Departments/Patient%20Safety%20and%20Quality%20Improvement/201213IssuesandRationale-GestationalAgeTerm.pdf to http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/ACOG_Departments/Patient_Safety_and_Quality_Improvement/~/media/Departments/Patient%20Safety%20and%20Quality%20Improvement/201213IssuesandRationale-GestationalAgeTerm.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105042348/http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/further-issues-relating-late-abortion-fetal-viability-and-registrati to http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/further-issues-relating-late-abortion-fetal-viability-and-registrati

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gestational age. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502070318/http://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Obstetric_Practice/Late-Preterm_Infants to http://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Obstetric_Practice/Late-Preterm_Infants

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Moved
I'm repeatedly coming across refs of GA meaning embryonic age rather than LMP in other anglophone countries, e.g. Canada here. So I moved the article to an (obstetrics) dab. Often it's hard to tell which def a source is using, but when 1st trimester is defined as 12 weeks (as in the EU), they're presumably counting from either fertilization (e.g. Canada) or implantation (e.g. Mexico, WHO, FIGO) — kwami (talk) 02:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 10 August 2022

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. After extended time for discussion, there is a sufficient consensus to support this move. Editors are advised to therefore adjust the articles as needed to provide the clearest access to information and terminology to the readers. BD2412 T 02:52, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Gestational age (obstetrics) → Gestational age – It is inappropriate for Foo to redirect to Foo (disambiguator): it should be the other way round. The article currently at Gestational age (obstetrics) is the only article with that title and if it is the primary topic for "Gestational age" then it should be moved to Gestational age. If it is not the primary topic then there should be a disambiguation page at Gestational age (with 2 entries: Gestational age (obstetrics) and Embryonic age). One or the other: not the current sitution. Pinging recent editors, ,. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 15:05, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose: dab page or clear title I initially created a dab page, but that was objected to at Talk:Gestational age. The problem is that this article is not about the age of gestation -- that is, it's not about "gestational age" in general, -- and so "gestational age" is a confusing title for people living in anglophone countries where "gestational age" does mean the age of gestation, such as Canada. If TWODABS isn't a problem, I'd prefer a dab page (we could probably add a third dab, for polities where gestational age is the age of a pregnancy), or we could perhaps move this to a clear non-parenthetical title such as obstetric gestational age. — kwami (talk) 09:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support a dab page was unnecessary as was use of embryonic age as gestational age is contrasted with ferilization age. Fail to see that the article is not about the age of gestation.?--Iztwoz (talk) 10:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * There's no gestation if there's no embryo to gestate. The "age of gestation" would be the age of the embryo that has gestated. "Gestational age" is jargon, in some countries, for time since the onset of your last menses, before you even had sex. So obstetric gestational age and age of gestation are two different things. In the US, "gestational age" is the former, but in countries such as Canada, it's the latter. In general, if an English-language source speaks of "gestational age", you won't know which age it's referring to, obstetric or biological. — kwami (talk) 19:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per above. Gestational age almost universally means the time since the LMP, even in Canada (e.g. ). On another note though, I don't think we really need separate pages discussing two slightly different systems for measuring the same thing. Persaonlly I think embryonic age and fertilization age should all redirect to this page, and the opening sentence can simply explain the differences between the different measures, then let the reader know that it's the LMP one that will be in use throuhgout the article. Then no disambiguation is needed either way. — Amakuru (talk) 16:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * So we make it very clear in the lead that "gestational age" as we use it is not the age of gestation? — kwami (talk) 23:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. <!-- Template:RM bottom --

title: Talk:Gestational age


text:
Sheila Scott

Sheila Christine Scott OBE (née Hopkins; 27 April 1922 – 20 October 1988) was an English aviator who broke over 100 aviation records through her long-distance flight endeavours, which included a 34000 mi "world and a half" flight in 1971. On this flight, she became the first person to fly over the North Pole in a small aircraft. She was also the first European woman to fly solo around the world.

Early years
Born Sheila Christine Hopkins in Worcester, Worcestershire, England, she had a turbulent childhood and did not do well at the Alice Ottley School, nearly being expelled several times. During World War II, she joined the services as a nurse in a naval hospital.

Flying
In 1943, she started a career as an actress as Sheila Scott, a name she maintained long after she stopped acting. She had a short marriage from 1945 to 1950 to Rupert Bellamy.

In 1958 she learned to fly, going solo at Thruxton Aerodrome after nine months of training. Her first aircraft was a Thruxton Jackaroo (converted from a De Havilland Tiger Moth) G-APAM, which she owned from 1959 to 1964.

In May 1965 the Piper Aircraft company loaned their Piper Comanche 400 European demonstrator N8515P (named Myth Sunpip) to Sheila, enabling her to set a number of European speed records for its class, such as return trips from London (RAF Northolt) to The Hague, Brussels, Dublin, and Belfast.

Around the world flights
In April 1966, she obtained another Piper Comanche, this time a 260B registered G-ATOY (named Myth Too) in which she set many of her records. It was in this aircraft that she made her first solo round the world flight, departing London Heathrow on 18 May 1966 and returning on 20 June 1966, having covered approximately 31,000 mi in 189 flying hours over 34 days. It was the first solo around the world flight by a British subject, the longest-distance solo flight, and the only third around the world flight by a woman. In 1969–70, she took part in the London to Sydney Air Race (with G-ATOY), thereafter continuing solo around the world for a second time. She was the only solo female pilot participating in the race, and experienced problems on the course. Scott was plagued by technical problems during the race, and was stranded for several days due to broken navigational equipment. She sold the aircraft in 1971, and some years later it crashed following engine failure. The remains are on display in the collection of the National Museum of Flight in East Fortune, Scotland. In 1971, she used a twin-engine Piper Aztec 250 G-AYTO (named Mythre) to complete her third solo round the world flight, featuring an unusual route starting at Nairobi, just south of the equator, flying north to London, before continuing on to cross over the North Pole (a first for a light aircraft). She then continued via Anchorage and San Francisco to Hawaii, before crossing the equator again on her way to Darwin, Australia. From here, she began the return back towards London, with the 'world-and-a-half' circumnavigation taking 55 days. During her flight, she carried NASA equipment as part of an experimental test of satellite communications technology.

Despite winning many records in the flight, Scott later claimed the trip cost her $110,400 and left her heavily in debt.

Mythre was returned to the Piper factory in Lock Haven, PA where it was one of over a hundred planes damaged beyond repair in a flood in 1972.

World Record Flights
Scott made over 100 world record flights. These include:

 * 1965: London to Dublin #13754
 * 1965: London to Paris #13767
 * 1965: London to Den Haag and return #13762
 * 1965: Den Haag to London #13651
 * 1965: London to Dublin and return #13755
 * 1965: Belfast to London #13347
 * 1966: Scott's Around the World Flight set ten Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) World Records for Speed Over a Recognised Course:
 * London to Rome, 258.13 kilometers per hour (160.40 miles per hour) (FAI Record File Numbers 4679, 4680);
 * London to Auckland, 41.42 km/h (25.74 mph) #4660, 4661;
 * London to Darwin, 45.67 km/h (28.38 mph) #4666, 4670;
 * London to Fiji Islands, 34.60 km/h (21.50 mph) #4672; 4673;
 * Lisbon to London, 244.00 km/h (151.62 mph) #4956, 4657.
 * 1967: London to Cape Town
 * 1967: Malta to London #4685
 * 1967: Shannon, Ireland to Ottawa, Canada #4700
 * 1967: Madrid, Spain to London, UK #4683
 * 1967: North Atlantic Ocean
 * 1969: South Atlantic Ocean
 * 1971: Equator to Equator over the North Pole
 * 1971: San Francisco, CA to Honolulu, HI #4626
 * 1971: 3rd Around the World Solo (100th world record)

Affiliations
She was the founder and the first governor of the British branch of the Ninety-Nines, an association for licensed women pilots which had been created by Amelia Earhart. She was a member of the International Association of Licensed Women Pilots and of the Whirly-Girls, an association of women helicopter pilots.

Honours and awards

 * 1968: Appointed an Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE).
 * 1966 and 1970: Scott was awarded the Harmon International Aviation Trophy (Aviatrix category) for her round-the-world flights and other accomplishments, including setting a new light plane speed record of 28,633 miles solo in 33 days and 3 minutes.
 * 1965, 1967, 1968: Brabazon of Tara Award.
 * 1967: Jean Lennox Bird Trophy
 * 1968: Britannia Trophy of the Royal Aero Club of Britain
 * 1971: Royal Aero Club Gold Medal
 * Silver Medal of the Guild of Pilots
 * Isabella d’Este (Italy)
 * 2020: AIRDAT, a British airport systems, data and training company, named their January 2020 software update SCOTT after Sheila Scott
 * 2023: A blue plaque was placed at RGS Worcester to commemorate her time at the Alice Ottley School (which merged with RGS Worcester in 2007).
 * The University of Worcester has named a teaching building after her, the Sheila Scott Building.

Activities beyond flying and later years
On 20 November 1966, she appeared as a contestant on the American panel show What's My Line. The following year, she appeared as herself on the game show To Tell the Truth where she received three of four possible votes.

In 1971, she passed her automobile driving test, after four failed tries in 12 years. In 1972, she turned her attention to the sea, and looked for sponsors for an around-the-world yacht race, to be held the next year. It is unclear if this race ever took place.

Scott was a published author as well as an aviator. She wrote I Must Fly in 1968 and On Top of the World in 1973, the latter being published in the U.S. as Barefoot in the Sky in 1974.

During one of her races, her London flat was burgled, and she never recovered financially. Before her death, Scott lived in a bedsit in Pimlico in poverty. She was diagnosed with cancer and died at age 66 at the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, in 1988.

title: Sheila Scott


text:
Charles Yeater

Charles Emmett Yeater (April 24, 1861 – July 20, 1943 ) of Sedalia, Missouri was acting Governor-General of the Philippines from March 5, 1921 to October 14, 1921.

From 1901 to 1935, the governor-general was the chief political executive of the Philippines, when the country was governed by the United States of America.

The Charles E. Yeater Learning Center at State Fair Community College in Sedalia is named for him.

He served as Democratic member of the Missouri Senate in 1892, and was a supporter of the legislation to move the Missouri State Capital from Jefferson City to Sedalia, which failed in the popular vote.

He is buried at Crown Hill Cemetery, Sedalia, Missouri.

title: Charles Yeater


text:
Oxbow

An oxbow is a U-shaped metal pole (or larger wooden frame) that fits the underside and the sides of the neck of an ox or bullock. A bow pin holds it in place.

The term "oxbow" is widely used to refer to a U-shaped meander in a river, sometimes cut off from the modern course of the river that formed it, creating an oxbow lake.

Developed form
Its upper ends pass through a purpose-drilled hole through the bar of the yoke that is held in place into the yoke with a metal screw or key, called a bow pin. Where wood is used it is most often hardwood steamed into shape, especially elm, hickory or willow. A ring, enabling left/right movement controlled from the centre, is attached by a plate to the centre underside of a wooden yoke to enable a pair of bullocks/oxen to be chained to any other pairs in a team and to be hitched to the load behind the animal team.

Uses of the yoke and oxbows
The load is a plough or any other dragged, non-motorised, field agricultural machinery.

Alternative
Wooden staves can be used instead with a yoke, which is then termed a withers yoke, named after animals with high backs (withers) (e.g. zebu cattle) which pull mostly on the yoke part of the equipment, not as greatly on the bow shape borne by the stronger front quarters of oxen and bullocks.

title: Oxbow


text:
Architectural designer

The term architectural designer may refer to a building designer who is not a registered architect, architectural technologist or any other person that is involved in the design process of buildings or urban landscapes.

Architectural designers may not hold the same degree qualification and are generally not recognised by a statutory body. Depending on the jurisdiction, limitations may exist in project size and scope that an architectural designer is permitted to perform services for without direct supervision from a registered architect. Independent architectural designers generally work on projects that are within these limitations.

Often, building designers who have not registered as architects are referred to as architectural designers, as this term is not protected by statute in many countries. However, in many countries around the world, the term architectural designer and the derivatives of architecture are legally reserved for registered architects.

title: Architectural designer


text:
Yashodharman

Yashodharman (Gupta script: Ya-śo-dha-rmma, ) (r. 515 – 545) was a ruler of Malwa, in Central India, during the early part of the 6th century. He probably belonged to the Second Aulikara dynasty. He conquered much of the Indian subcontinent between c. 530-540 AD according to Mandsaur pillar inscription.

History
Towards the end of the 5th century, India came under attack from the Hunas. Yashodharman and possibly the Jat emperor, defeated a Huna army and their ruler Mihirakula in 528 AD and drove them out of India.

Three inscriptions of Yasodharman have been found in Mandsaur. One of these, the Mandsaur stone inscription of Yashodharman-Vishnuvardhana is of samvat 589 (532 AD).

Mandsaur stone inscription of Yashodharman-Vishnuvardhana (532 AD)
The Mandsaur stone inscription of Yashodharman-Vishnuvardhana was written in 532 AD, and records the construction of a well by a person named Daksha in Dashapura (modern Mandsaur, also often spelled Mandasor), during the rule of Yashodharman. The inscription mentions the victories of local ruler Yasodharman (and possibly Chalukya ruler Vishnuvardhana) over Northern and Eastern kingdoms. These kingdoms are not further specified, but it is known that Yashodhaman occupied most of the territories of the Alchon Huns or Hunas to the north, and most of the territories of the Gupta Empire to the east following his victories. Only one more Gupta inscription is known after that date, a land grant in the area of Kotivarsha (Bangarh in West Bengal) by the last Gupta emperor Vishnugupta. The victory against the Alchons Huns is also described in the Mandsaur pillar inscription of Yashodharman.

""(L. 5.)— And, again, victorious over the earth is this same king of men, the glorious Vishnuvardhana, the conqueror in war; by whom his own famous lineage, which has the Aulikara-crest, has been brought to a state of dignity that is ever higher and higher. By him, having brought into subjection, with peaceful overtures and by war, the mighty kings of the east and many (kings) of the north, this second name of "Supreme King of Kings and Supreme Lord", pleasing in the world (but) difficult of attainment, is carried on high.""

- Mandsaur stone inscription of Yashodharman and Vishnuvardhana

Mandsaur pillar inscription of Yashodharman (515–550 AD)

Twin monolithic pillars at Sondani in Mandsaur District were erected by Yasodharman as a record of his victory. In a part of the Sondani inscription, Yasodharman thus praises himself for having defeated king Mihirakula:

""He (Yasodharman) to whose two feet respect was paid, with complimentary presents of the flowers from the lock of hair on the top of (his) head, by even that (famous) king Mihirakula, whose forehead was pained through being bent low down by the strength of (his) arm in (the act of compelling) obeisance""

- Mandsaur pillar inscription of Yashodharman

Territory
In Line 5 of the Mandsaur pillar inscription, Yashodharman claims he vanquished his enemies and now controls the territory from the neighbourhood of the (river) Lauhitya (Brahmaputra River) to the "Western Ocean" (Western Indian Ocean), and from the Himalayas to mountain Mahendra.

Yashodharman thus conquered vast territories from the Hunas and the Guptas, although his short-lived empire would ultimately disintegrate between c. 530–540 AD.

title: Yashodharman


text:
Novo Selo

Novo Selo, meaning "new village" in several Slavic languages, may refer to the following places:

In Albania

 * Novoselë, a municipality in the Vlorë District
 * Novoselë, Kolonjë, a municipality in the Kolonjë District
 * Benjë-Novoselë, a village in the municipality of Përmet, Gjirokastër County
 * Novoselë, Maliq, a village in the municipality of Maliq, Korçë County

In Austria

 * Novo Selo, Croatian name for Neudorf bei Parndorf, a place in Burgenland

In Bosnia and Herzegovina

 * Novo Selo (Brod), a village near Brod
 * Novo Selo, Bijeljina, a village near Bijeljina
 * Novo Selo, Bosanski Brod, a village near Bosanski Brod
 * Novo Selo (Šamac), a village near Bosanski Šamac
 * Novo Selo, Donji Vakuf, a village near Donji Vakuf
 * Novo Selo (Gradiška), a village near Gradiška
 * Novo Selo, Kupres, Canton 10, a village near Kupres, Canton 10
 * Novo Selo, Kupres, Republika Srpska, a village near Kupres, Republika Srpska
 * Novo Selo, Odžak, formerly called Balegovac, a village near Odžak
 * Novo Selo, Prnjavor, a village near Prnjavor
 * Novo Selo (Sokolac), a village near Sokolac
 * Novo Selo, Tešanj, a village near Tešanj
 * Novo Selo, Zenica, a village near Zenica
 * Novo Selo, Zvornik, a village near Zvornik

In Bulgaria

 * Novo Selo, Kyustendil Province, Kyustendil Province
 * Novo Selo, Plovdiv Province, Plovdiv Province
 * Novo Selo, Ruse Province, Ruse Province
 * Novo Selo, Sliven Province, presently uninhabited, part of the Novo Selo military training range
 * Novo Selo, Sofia Province, Sofia Province
 * Novo Selo, Stara Zagora Province, Stara Zagora Province
 * Novo Selo, Veliko Tarnovo Province, Veliko Tarnovo Province
 * Novo Selo, Vidin Province, seat of Novo Selo municipality, Vidin Province
 * the former village of Novo Selo, today a quarter of Apriltsi, Lovech Province
 * Dolno Novo Selo, Sofia Province
 * Dolno Novo Selo, Stara Zagora Province
 * Gorno Novo Selo, Stara Zagora Province
 * Gorsko Novo Selo, Veliko Tarnovo Province

Former name

 * Blagoevo, Razgrad Province, Razgrad Province (until 1878)
 * Blagovo, Montana Province, Montana Province (until 1949)
 * Dalgopol, Varna Province (until 1934)
 * Dragomirovo, Pernik Province, Pernik Province (until 1950)
 * Dolno Pole, Haskovo Province (1906-1960)
 * Gorno Selo, Sofia Province (until 1961)
 * Mramor, Haskovo Province, Haskovo Province (until 1950)
 * Ruzhitsa, Yambol Province, Yambol Province (until 1934)

In Croatia

 * Novo Selo, Brač, a village near Selca
 * Novo Selo, Bjelovar-Bilogora County, a village near Čazma
 * Novo Selo, Karlovac County, a village near Slunj
 * Novo Selo, Požega-Slavonia County, a village near Požega, Požega-Slavonia County
 * Novo Selo, Sisak-Moslavina County, a village near Sisak, Sisak-Moslavina County
 * Novo Selo, Zagreb County, a village near Vrbovec, Zagreb County
 * Novo Selo Bosiljevsko, a village near Bosiljevo
 * Novo Selo Garešničko, a village near Berek
 * Novo Selo Glinsko, a village near Glina
 * Novo Selo Koreničko, a village near Plitvička Jezera
 * Novo Selo Lasinjsko, a village near Lasinja
 * Novo Selo Okićko, a village near Klinča Sela
 * Novo Selo Palanječko, a village near Sisak, Sisak-Moslavina County
 * Novo Selo Perjasičko, a village near Barilović
 * Novo Selo Podravsko, a village near Mali Bukovec
 * Novo Selo Rok, a village near Čakovec, Međimurje County
 * Novo Selo na Dravi, a village near Čakovec, Međimurje County
 * Novo Selo Žumberačko, a village near Samobor, Zagreb County
 * Donje Novo Selo, Croatia, a village near Nijemci, Vukovar-Syrmia County
 * Ličko Novo Selo, a village near Đurđenovac
 * Našičko Novo Selo, a village near Đurđenovac
 * Vinkovačko Novo Selo, a former village now neighbourhood of Vinkovci

In Greece

 * Plevroma, formerly Novo Selo
 * Krithia, Thessaloniki, formerly Novo Selo
 * Neochorouda, was also known as Novo Selo
 * Agia Paraskevi, Thessaloniki, was also known as Novo Selo

In Kosovo

 * Camp Novo Selo, military NATO camp in Novo Selo near Vushtrri, see Swisscoy
 * Novo Selo (Kamenica), a village in Kamenica
 * Novo Selo (Peja), a village in Peja
 * Novo Selo (Prizren), a village in Prizren
 * Novo Selo (Skenderaj), a village in Skenderaj
 * Novo Selo (Viti), a village in Viti
 * Novo Selo (Vushtrri), a village in Vushtrri

In Montenegro

 * Novo Selo, Danilovgrad, a village in Danilovgrad Municipality

In North Macedonia

 * Novo Selo, Debarca, a village in Debarca municipality
 * Novo Selo, Demir Hisar, a village in Demir Hisar municipality
 * Novo Selo, Čaška, a village in Čaška municipality
 * Novo Selo, Gjorče Petrov, a town in Gjorče Petrov Municipality
 * Novo Selo, Mavrovo and Rostuša, a village in Municipality of Mavrovo and Rostuša
 * Novo Selo, Kočani, a village in Kočani municipality
 * Novo Selo, Kumanovo, a village in Kumanovo municipality
 * Novo Selo Municipality, a municipality in eastern North Macedonia
 * Novo Selo, Novo Selo, a village in Novo Selo municipality
 * Novo Selo, Štip, a village in Štip municipality
 * Novo Selo, Struga, a village in Struga municipality
 * Novo Selo, Kičevo, a village in Kičevo municipality
 * Novo Selo, Veles, a village in Veles municipality
 * Novo Selo, Zelenikovo, a village in Zelenikovo municipality
 * Novo Selo, Želino, a village in Želino municipality
 * Novo Selo, Bogovinje, a village in Bogovinje Municipality

In Serbia

 * Bačko Novo Selo, in northern Serbia, in the municipality of Bač
 * Banatsko Novo Selo, in northern Serbia, in the municipality of Pančevo
 * Novo Selo (Kanjiža), a village in northern Serbia, in the municipality of Kanjiža
 * Novo Selo (Raška), a village in Raška municipality, Raška District
 * Novo Selo (Surdulica), a village in Surdulica municipality, Pčinja District
 * Novo Selo (Trgovište), a village in Trgovište municipality, Pčinja District
 * Novo Selo (Vladimirci), a village in Vladimirci, Mačva District
 * Novo Selo (Loznica), a village in Loznica
 * Novo Selo (Velika Plana), a village in Velika Plana, Podunavski District
 * Novo Selo (Sokobanja), a village in Sokobanja
 * Novo Selo (Vrnjačka Banja), a village in Vrnjačka Banja, Raška District
 * Novo Selo (Raška), a village in Raška District
 * Novo Selo (Gadžin Han), a village in Gadžin Han, Nišava District
 * Novo Selo (Kuršumlija), a village in Kuršumlija
 * Novo Selo (Prokuplje), a village in Prokuplje
 * Novo Selo (Bela Palanka), a village in Bela Palanka, Pirot District
 * Novo Selo (Lebane), a village in Lebane
 * Novo Selo (Leskovac), a village in Leskovac
 * Deveti Maj (old name Novo Selo), a village in Palilula, Niš

In Slovakia

 * Devinsko Novo Selo, former name of Devínska Nová Ves, a borough of Bratislava

title: Novo Selo