text:
Donald Bakker

Donald Michel Bakker is a Canadian from Penticton who made headlines when he was the first person to be tried in Canada for child prostitution crimes committed in another country. Bakker was charged under the sex tourism law which is used to punish those who use child prostitutes while outside Canada.

In 2004, he pleaded not guilty, claiming that Canada has no right to police people while they are outside its jurisdiction. Much of the evidence against him was videotapes that Bakker himself made. Some of these videos show Bakker torturing Vancouver area prostitutes with metal clips and electric cords. Other videos show him having sex with girls in Cambodia, the oldest of whom was 12.

On June 1, 2005, he pleaded guilty to 10 counts of sexual assault to avoid a trial. The Solicitor and Crown prosecutor jointly asked for a 10-year prison sentence. Bakker had already served 18 months, which would count as double time, meaning he will have seven more years in prison. He is eligible for parole within one and a half years.

On June 1, 2012, Donald Bakker was released from prison, and now resides in Abbotsford, British Columbia.

title: Donald Bakker


text:
Pampita

Ana Carolina Ardohaín Dos Santos (born 17 January 1978) is an Argentine model, television personality, dancer, television host and actress. She is widely known by the nickname Pampita, a diminutive for La Pampa, the province where she was born.

Personal life
Carolina Ardohaín was born on 17 January 1978 in General Acha, La Pampa, Argentina: she was one of very few people baptised at the monastery of Nuestra Señora del Pilar in Recoleta, Buenos Aires. Her father is Argentine, her mother is Brazilian.

Pampita is the mother of a daughter, Blanca Vicuña Ardohaín (born 15 May 2006 and deceased 8 September 2012), and three sons, Bautista Vicuña Ardohaín (born 29 February 2008), Beltrán Vicuña Ardohaín (born 8 June 2012) and Benicio Vicuña Ardohaín (born 12 October 2014). Their father is the Chilean actor Benjamín Vicuña, boyfriend of Pampita from July 2005 to December 2015.

Pampita on 22 November 2019 married the gastronomic entrepreneur Roberto García Moritan; this couple has a daughter, Ana García Moritán Ardohaín, who was born on 22 July 2021.

Career
Since 2013, Carolina Ardohaín represents the car makes Citroën and Citroën DS line. In May 2016, Pampita took part in the dancing reality show Bailando 2016 as a member of the jury. From June 2017 she present the talk show Pampita Online. In March 2022, she host the program El hotel de los famosos, together with Leandro Leunis, in eltrece.

Acting career
She debuted in 2002 as actress in the first season of the Argentine telenovela juvenil (teen telenovela) Rebelde Way with the role of Lulú, the teacher of dance. In 2005 Pampita starred in the Argentine romantic telenovela Doble vida with the role of Ema, who is the first of co-protagonists. Pampita made her cinema debut in the 2009 Chilean film Súper, todo Chile adentro with the secondary role of Camila Hudson. Pampita starred in the 2015 Chilean television series Familia moderna with the role of Magdalena. In the 2017 Argentine film Desearás al hombre de tu hermana Pampita played the role of Ofelia, her first leading role.

As an herself
Realities shows

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Pampita


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedians/Tarrant County, TX

Wikipedians/Tarrant County, TX
Texan Wikipedians' listing has been overhauled, county listings now obsolete. Shem 02:35, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)


text: File:Reneetwoface.png

title: File:Reneetwoface.png


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedians/Travis County, TX

Wikipedians/Travis County, TX
Texan Wikipedians' listing has been overhauled, county listings now obsolete. Shem 02:35, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Neuroscientist

Mark Felt Redux
In June you voted on the featured article candidacy of W. Mark Felt, which failed. It has now been resubmitted. In the event you would like to vote on the new candidacy, it is at Featured article candidates/W. Mark Felt/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 18:58, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

ICP
I expanded the intracranial pressure article, but I'm afraid I did it with way too much emphasis on head trauma, since that's all I know about. I saw your comment on the talk page. Maybe you'd like to have a look at the article and cut stuff that's too head trauma-ey and doesn't apply to other causes of increased ICP. For example, the treatments section I added, I have no idea whether they do those things for other causes of increased ICP. If not, maybe that should be a separate page, like ICP increases in head trauma. Anyway, if you feel like taking a hack at it, that'd be good, otherwise, no big deal. Thanks. Peace, --Delldot 00:19, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Terri Schiavo case
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of edits to this page. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Terri Schiavo case/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. Cheers, Ocaasit | c 20:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
 * Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
 * If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

title: User talk:Neuroscientist


text:
Webber-Camden, Minneapolis

Webber-Camden is a neighborhood in the Camden community of Minneapolis. Its boundaries are Penn and Newton avenues to the west, the Canadian Pacific Railway tracks to the north, Interstate 94 to the east, and Dowling Avenue to the south. It is located in Ward 4, represented by council member LaTrisha Vetaw.

The neighborhood was just known as "Camden" until 1995, when the city added "Webber" to the name. Webber Park and Webber Parkway are located in the neighborhood.

title: Webber-Camden, Minneapolis


text: Category:Operas by Giacomo Meyerbeer

title: Category:Operas by Giacomo Meyerbeer


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of famous Holocaust survivors

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 00:02, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

List of famous Holocaust survivors
Not encyclopedic

 * Delete - Millions of people did not die in the holocaust. This list is far too vague by nature and - at worst - can end up being a list of almost everyone in the world who was alive in 1946.  --Douglas
 * How is this vague? Merely being alive in 1946 doesn't mean you survived the Holocaust – managing to survive encarceration in a Nazi concentration camp, or to escape from Germany Nazi-controlled territory before you were so imprisoned does. Of those that did, some are notable, and we have an interesting list. Keep, but suggest a move to List of notable Holocaust survivors. A и D я 01D  TALK  EMAIL  03:01, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * It is vague in that it is not restricted to those who 'survived a Nazi concentration camp' (if it were, the title should say so) nor is it simply those who managed 'to escape from Germany before you were so imprisoned'. Even if those definitions are taken, it is questionable as to whether someone who was not incarcerated would have been.  Why only restrict it to anyone who escaped from Germany - what about those who escaped from other countries the Nazis overran during 30s and 40s?  Why only those who escaped from countries that were overrun - what about countries that would have been overrun if the Nazis had not been stopped by force (UK, Africa, Russia, Ireland, Iceland, Canada, USA ...)? --Douglas 12:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Alright, let's change Germany to Nazi-controlled territories, which is what I should have said in the first place. Regarding countries that would have been overrun, that's absurd. The Nazis had a clearly definable sphere of influence during WW2, at least AFAIK. We could play this what-if game with just about any historical event to make any discussion vague and pointless. It seems to me your beef is with the title of the article and not the content. To me, "Holocaust survivors" connotes a clear meaning; to you, it does not. Perhaps a compromise would be to include a detailed explanation for criteria for inclusion in the list at the beginning of the article. List of people who escaped Nazi concentration camps, managed to survive in such camps long enough to await rescue by Allied forces, or were able to escape Nazi-controlled territory before being encarcerated is a rather unwieldy article title.
 * LOL, I agree with the unwieldiness of that title! However, I still think that including those who were able to escape Nazi-controlled territory before being incarcerated is far too vague and could include almost anyone who got out of the way - since they were almost targets just because they wanted to escape.  Such a definition would include, for example, Albert Einstein and dozens (hundreds?) of other 'notable' scientists as well as thousands of political, military and society 'notables'.  The Nazis sphere of influence is not so clear to define in terms of Holocaust implementation: in some regions (e.g. Norway, Channel Islands), they never quite achieved the political/military/social environment necessary even though they 'occupied' the land while in other areas (e.g. Spain and to some extent Italy) they had quite a lot of influence without occupation.  This is not to say, however, that there is not a generally-accepted map of what territories were at some time Nazi-controlled.  I also see no moral, ethical or encyclopedic reason to include those who avoided incarceration by fleeing and exclude those who avoided incarceration by fighting.  --Douglas 15:06, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll defer to your greater knowledge of the general topic. Would a list limited to those that survived and/or escaped from concentration camps be more keep-able? I would imagine that the list would be mostly populated with people of this sort, anyway (although I do note that at least one person on the list currently was never sent to a camp). A и D я 01D  TALK  EMAIL  15:42, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * A list of people who were once in a concentration camp and survived would be restricted and have some meaning. In this case, it should be Renamed and edited to comply: I would suggest the name of "List of notable people to survive a Nazi Concentration Camp."  --Douglas 23:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Your point about playing the what-if game with historical events is, to me, exactly WHY to delete rather than keep this list. This list IS about 'what if': what if these people had been captured, maybe they would be dead. --Douglas 15:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm really not getting your point here. If, say, Mr. Jones hadn't gotten on your hypothetical sinking ship from your analogy below, maybe he wouldn't have drowned. The fact is, though, he's (hypothetically) dead, and that other people who were not on the ship, but potentially could have been on it, are not (leaving aside those that were on the ship but managed to not die). We can make a list of those that survived and one of those that died; what happened before the ship sank is rather irrelevant. A и D я 01D  TALK  EMAIL  15:42, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * But presumably Mr Jones DID get on the ship. From the single, identifiable incident he can be said to have survived or died as fact.  The Holocaust is not such a single, identifiable incident.  --Douglas 23:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The discussion at Votes for deletion/List of Holocaust victims is probably relevant here. Uncle G 02:51, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
 * It is partially relevant but at least someone who died as a direct result of Nazi activity is much more identifiable, with the only possible grey area being whether that was the cause of death (for example, there were no doubt a few people incarcerated who were already near dead from other causes). --Douglas 12:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - a Holocaust survivor is surely not anyone who happened not to die during WWII, and the list is restricted to famous (agreed that it should be moved to "notable") persons. -- BD2412 talk 04:15, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
 * When I originally saw this article a couple of hours ago I moved it to its current title from "List of holocaust survivors" but I agree that notable is a better word. Keep. Also, Douglas, isn't it inherently obvious that a list of survivors of a horrific event is only going to be comprised of people who were directly affected by that event? -- Barfooz  (talk)  04:39, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * No, clearly not obvious - see above comment by AиDя01D. Surviving the Holocaust isn't like surviving a sinking ship, where you are either on the ship at the time or not.  The Holocaust was a political/social program intended to cover all parts of the world that Nazis intended to take over.  --Douglas 12:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, though both this and List of famous Holocaust victims need to be renamed as "notable," with "famous" as redirects. Nateji77 05:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, redirect as well. -- BD2412 talk 19:02, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
 * Keep as list of notable Holocaust survivors. Verifiable list for encyclopedic topic. Capitalistroadster 05:53, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Note that this is a list of famous survivors. Notable list. Sjakkalle 07:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. A useful list Dvyost 07:39, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nateji77. Karol 07:41, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, though it should probably be "notable" rather than "famous" in the title. Every Holocaust survivor who has a Wikipedia entry should be on this list.--Pharos 08:36, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * At least this definition of "notable" or "famous" (whichever) will keep the list down but my objection to this list still stands in that identifying someone as a one-time member of a concentration camp is one thing but identifying them as having not been put to death by the Nazis is a totally different issue. --Douglas 12:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to Notable and keep --Irishpunktom\talk 09:35, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Direct subjects of the holocaust who survived it are notable by a long shot. Jamyskis 11:08, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but define survivor as a survivor of the camps. Hornplease 17:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are many people (eg Elie Wiesel, Primo Levi) for whom being a Holocaust survivor is a major component of their fame.  But move to "notable". - Mustafaa 17:30, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, same vote as before. Title is POV, article is impossible to maintain.  RickK 19:19, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV. Who defines famous? What constitutes a holocaust survivor? Is it limited to Jews, or are Gypsies, gays, political prisoners, Jehovah's Witnesses and the like also included? Is it limited to Germany or other occupied territories? Is it limited to those captured and placed in the camps or does it include those who managed to elude capture? A nice idea, but in my personal opinion, there are too many problems. --Scimitar 21:03, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV, list subject is too vague to maintain. --Carnildo 21:37, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * keep this please it is not impossible Yuckfoo 21:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Annotate the list. — Phil Welch 23:39, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've now done this and added some qualifications. If you ask me, a Jew hiding out in someone's attic until the Nazis were gone counts as a Holocaust survivor, although if you want to go to the talk page we can debate and qualify this further. — Phil Welch 23:57, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. this list will never be hard to maintain, because the "famous," or if you prefer "notable," qualifier will always limit it to a relatively small number regardless of how one defines "Holocaust" and "survivor." carmeld1 00:11, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment my personal definition of a holocaust victim would not require having been in or died in the camps, that is, both Anne Frank and Walter Benjamin should be included (as they are on List of famous Holocaust victims). even if benjamin (suicide at a checkpoint) is debatable, i think most people would consider frank a holocaust victim. (and Rroma, blacks, communists, homosexuals, etc. would be included on these lists if deemed notable). Nateji77 12:33, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed. One of the minor difficulties I see with this list that I've not highlighted is that people such as Albert Einstein, T.Wonja Michael, Anne Frank etc. belong on both the List of famous Holocaust victims and this list.  That doesn't invalidate either but does highlight the vague definitions - of this list, especially.  --Douglas 14:45, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete "Famous" is an inherently POV term, and even notability is arguable. I cannot see how an encyclopedic list can be created under such circumstances. Denni ☯ 00:55, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
 * "Notability" is just the criterion for having an article on a particular subject in Wikipedia. Listing all Holocaust survivors who have articles means that there is no more "judgement" involved than is normally used in simply deciding whether a subject is important enough to merit its own article in the first place.--Pharos 01:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Extremely notable topic.  Why is this even listed for VfD? Kaibabsquirrel 04:07, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per RickK, Scimitar, and Denni. Use a category if this information is desired.  Then you can leave "famous" out of it because it will include only those who have WP articles.  Quale 09:57, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * keep, categories are not a substitute for annotated lists. Kappa 21:04, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I brought forth the deletion page for List of Holocaust victims, and agreed with its name change to List of Famous Holocaust victims. Jendeyoung 05:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep -Its purpose is to exalt famous survivors of the holocaust. There is nothing wrong with that.
 * It is not an encyclopedia's job to exalt anything. That is the job of propoganda.  Exhalting something is a reason for edit or removal is it is inherently not NPOV.  See Wikipedia is not a soapbox.  --Douglas 00:38, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .


text: File:Ultramanburns.jpg

title: File:Ultramanburns.jpg


text:
User talk:Diego001~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 02:39, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image Tagging Image:Richie-n-thompson-pdp-11.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Richie-n-thompson-pdp-11.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Thue | talk 09:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Diego001. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Diego001~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:CharlesTillon.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CharlesTillon.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:CharlesTillon.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:CharlesTillon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CharlesTillon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CharlesTillon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:Diego001~enwiki


text:
Lines in My Face

Lines in My Face is the third commercially released album by American rap rock band Chronic Future. It features the hit single "Time and Time Again", and has a range of themes in the tracks involving the Golden Era of the radio, New York City, and friendships. The album put the band into the mainstream for a short period, before the band left Interscope Records in 2006 and began an independent career.

A music video for the song "Time and Time Again" was made, featuring animated characters including the band itself. The music video tells the story of a rebellious young boy (seeming to be Mike Busse, as he performs lead vocals when the band plays in the video) who is sent off to war by his parents, but returns as a war hero. It is currently one of two music videos the band has made, the other being the video for "Insomniac" from the band's self-titled debut album.

The album featured more metal-orientated guitar styles, as well as Brandon Lee taking on the role as one of the lead vocalists.

Reception
The album received average to positive ratings and the song "Time and Time Again" was praised, becoming an instant favorite. The song "Shellshocked" is also very popular among fans. The album peaked at #18 on the Billboard Heatseekers chart.

Rolling Stone (p. 188) - 3.5 stars out of 5 - "[M]ost songs navigate the well-worn territory of pop punk and rap rock without bowing to the conventions of either."

Media appearances

 * "Time and Time Again" was used on the soundtrack of the hit video games Burnout 3 and MVP Baseball 2004, performed at G4's Gphoria in 2004, used for the 2004 WWE Diva Search, and was used in episode 20 of the first season of One Tree Hill.
 * "Wicked Games" was featured on the CSI: Miami episode Crime Wave.
 * "Static on the Radio" was used on the soundtrack of the video game Gretzky NHL 2005.
 * "Apology for Non-Symmetry" was used on the soundtrack of the driving simulator Gran Turismo 4.

Track listing

 * Note: In digital music stores, "Say Goodbye" is renamed to "Say Goodbye/Final Ambience."

Personnel

 * Mike Busse – lead vocals, backing vocals
 * Ben Collins – lead vocals, lead guitar, turntables, programming, backing vocals
 * Mike Loy – rhythm guitar
 * Brandon Lee – lead vocals, bass guitar, backing vocals
 * Barry Collins – drums, percussion

title: Lines in My Face


text:
Timeline of Jewish-Polish history

This article presents the timeline of selected events concerning the history of the Jews in Poland beginning with the formation of the Polish state under its first ruler, Mieszko I of Poland.

Timeline
960 – A Jewish merchant and trader from Spain, Ibrahim ibn Yaqub (Abraham ben Jacob), travels to Poland and writes the first description of the country and the city of Kraków. Jewish traders are very active in Central Europe. Mieszko I mints coins with Hebrew letters on them, though some attribute the coins to the times of Mieszko the Old.

1264 – Polish Prince Boleslaus the Pious issues Statute of Kalisz – The General Charter of Jewish Liberties in Poland, an unprecedented document in medieval history of Europe that allows Jews personal freedom, legal autonomy and separate tribunal for criminal matters as well as safeguards against forced baptism and blood libel. The Charter is ratified again by subsequent Polish Kings: Casimir the Great of Poland in 1334, Casimir IV of Poland in 1453, and Sigismund I the Old of Poland in 1539.

1334 – Casimir the Great of Poland ratifies again the General Charter of Jewish Liberties in Poland.

1343 – Persecuted in Western Europe, the Jews are invited to Poland by King Casimir the Great.

After massive expulsions of Jews from the Western Europe (England, France, Germany, and Spain), they found a refuge in the lands of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. During the Jagiellon Era Poland became the home to Europe's largest Jewish population, as royal edicts warranting Jewish safety and religious freedom from the 13th century contrasted with bouts of persecution in Western Europe, especially following the Black Death of 1348–1349, blamed by some in the West on Jews themselves. Large parts of Poland suffered relatively little from the outbreak, while the Jewish immigration brought valuable manpower and skills to the rising state. The greatest increase in Jewish numbers occurred in the 18th century, when Jews came to make up 7% of the Polish population.

1453 – Casimir IV of Poland ratifies again the General Charter of Jewish Liberties in Poland.

1500 – Some of the Jews expelled from Spain, Portugal and many German cities move to Poland. By the mid sixteenth century, some eighty percent of the world's Jews lives in Poland, a figure that held steady for centuries.

1501 – King Alexander of Poland readmits Jews to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

1525 – The first Jew is promoted to knighthood by king Sigismund I of Poland, without being forced to leave Judaism.

1534 – King Sigismund I of Poland abolishes the law that required Jews to wear special clothes.

1539 – King Sigismund I of Poland ratifies again the General Charter of Jewish Liberties in Poland.

1540–1620 – Immigration of Mizrahi Jews from the Ottoman Empire.

1547 – The first Hebrew Jewish printing house is founded in Lublin.

1567 – The first yeshiva is founded in Poland.

1580 – 1764 First session of the Council of Four Lands (Va'ad Arba' Aratzot) in Lublin, Poland. 70 delegates from Jewish communities (kehillot) meet to discuss taxation and other issues important to the Jewish community.

1606 – Poland first described as "Paradisus Iudaeorum".

1623 – The first time a separate Jewish Diet (Va'ad) for the Grand Duchy of Lithuania is convened.

1632 – King Władysław IV Vasa forbids Anti-Semitic books and printings.

1633 – Jews of Poznań are granted a privilege of forbidding Christians to enter into their city quarter.

1648 – Jewish population of Poland reaches 450,000 or 60% of the world Jewish population. In Bohemia Jews number 40,000 and in Moravia 25,000. The worldwide Jewish population is estimated at 750,000.

1648 – 1655 The Ukrainian Cossack Bohdan Khmelnytsky leads Uprising resulting in massacres of Polish szlachta and Jewry that leaves ca. 65,000 Jews dead and similar number of szlachta also. The total decrease in the number of Jews is estimated at 100,000. Poland loses 40% of her population during The Deluge.

1750 – Jewish population of Poland reaches 750,000 which constitutes around 70% of the Jewish population in the world which is estimated at 1,200,000.

1759 – Unprecedented event of the voluntary conversion of around 3,000 of the followers of Jacob Frank who convert to Catholicism and are accepted into the ranks of Polish nobility szlachta with all the social benefits.

1773–1795 – Three partitions of Poland between imperial Russia, the Kingdom of Prussia and imperial Austria. Old Polish privileges of Jewish communities are denounced.

1831 – November Uprising against Russian. Small Jewish militia units take part in the defence of Warsaw against Russians.

1860–1863 – Jews participate in patriotic manifestations in Warsaw.

1863 – Small groups of Jews take part in January Uprising January Uprising.

1862 – The privileges of some cities in Russia forbidding Jews to settle down in them are denounced.

1880 – World Jewish population numbers around 7.7 million, 90% of which in Europe (mostly Eastern Europe), and around 3.5 million in the former Polish provinces.

1897 – The first Russian census numbers 5,200,000 Jews plus 4,900,000 in the Pale. The Kingdom of Poland has 1,300,000 Jews or 14% of its population.

1918 – Poland regains independence after 123 years. Jews are granted equal rights in independent Poland.

1921 – Polish-Soviet peace treaty in Riga. Citizens of both sides are given rights to choose the country. Hundreds of thousands of Jews, especially shopkeepers or other professionals who are forbidden to work in the Soviet Union, settle in Poland.

1924 – 2,989,000 Jews according to a census by religion in Poland (10,5% of total). Jewish youth constitutes 23% of students of high schools and 26% of university students.

1930 – The world Jewry population numbers 15,000,000, of which the largest numbers live in the USA (4,000,000), Poland (3,500,000 = 11% of total), Soviet Union (2,700,000 = 20% of total), Romania (1,000,000 = 6% of total) and Palestine (175,000 = 1.2% of total).

1933–1939 – German Jews attempt to emigrate, but almost all countries close borders for Jews, including United Kingdom and USA. Most Jews find a temporary asylum in Poland.

1939–1945 – World War II and the Holocaust (Ha Shoah). Germans in occupied Poland built six major death camps: Auschwitz II (Auschwitz-Birkenau), Chełmno, Belzec, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Treblinka.

1946 – The Kielce pogrom.

1945–1948 – Tens of thousands of Holocaust survivors leave Poland for Israel and the United States.

1964 – The Second Vatican Council states in its Nostra aetate Declaration, that the Jews are not responsible for the death of Christ.

1968 – Communist regime-sponsored anti-Zionist campaign in Poland. Many Polish Jews emigrate.

Mid 1970s-present – Growing revival of Klezmer music (The folk music of European Jews). and Yiddish culture.

1988 – The first Festival of Jewish Culture in Kraków. In 2012, the nine-day Festival attracts around 40,000 visitors.

1989–present – Reestablishment of several Jewish communities in Poland, most notably in Warsaw, Kraków, Gdańsk and Wrocław.

2006 – Jewish population in Poland is approximately 25,000. (Jewish population) Many Polish Jews are of mixed background (Jewish and Catholic) and discover their Jewish identity later in life.

2010 – Jewish population in Poland is approximately 50,000.

title: Timeline of Jewish-Polish history


text: Category:Indoor arenas in Australia

title: Category:Indoor arenas in Australia


text:
XPlay

XPlay is a drag and drop application created by Mediafour. This third party program allows for easier access of digital music on an iPod and is not supported by Apple. It is notable for allowing Windows computers to use Mac formatted iPods.

A preview version was released in December 2001, with the first official release on June 24, 2002.

The most recent version of the software, released in 2008, with its final update (Version 3.5.1) having been released in April 2010, is XPlay 3, which could be purchased for $29.95, though it is no longer available. This version integrates an iPod with the Windows operating system, allowing for the iPod to be managed using Windows Media Player, Windows Media Center, iTunes, or XPlay. It also allows the user to drag music, image, and video files from a disk directly onto the iPod.

title: XPlay


text:
User:Moxie~enwiki

http://www.thoughtcrime.org

title: User:Moxie~enwiki


text:
Talk:Mathematics/Schemes

Redirects are cheap, and are a standard way of handling situations such as this. Please also put your comments on the talk page, not directly on the article. Thanks. Denni ☯ 02:41, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)

 * Got it, thanks. I thought that redirect was not helpful in any way, but I see your point. Oleg Alexandrov 03:31, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mathematics/Schemes


text:
Ramesuan (king of Ayutthaya)

Somdet Phra Ramesuan (สมเด็จพระราเมศวร, ; 1339–1395), son of king Ramathibodi I, reigned as the second and fifth king of the kingdom of Ayutthaya. When King Ramathibodi ascended to the throne of Ayuthaya, he sent King Ramesuan to reign in Lavo. Upon King Ramathibodi's death in 1369, King Ramesuan traveled to Ayutthaya to assume the throne, but held it for less than a year before being deposed by his uncle, King Borommaracha I, the ruler of Suphanburi. Sources differ over the nature of their conflict; official chronicles state that the older Boromaracha ruled with the willing consent of his nephew, while Jeremias van Vliet's Short History of Thailand indicated that Boromaracha's ascension came only after a bloody conflict bordering on civil war.

Whatever the case, by 1388 King Ramesuan had gathered sufficient support from his power base in Lavo to return to Ayutthaya and challenge Boromarachi's 17-year-old son Thong Lan for the throne. King Ramesuan's forces quickly took the palace and executed Thong Lan. King Ramesuan then held the throne until 1395, when he was succeeded by his son Rama (also known as Ramaracha).

During King Ramesuan's second reign, the king seems to have come to an understanding with the kingdom of Sukhothai, against whom Boromaracha had warred throughout his reign. Instead, some sources record conflicts with the kingdom of Lan Na (in northern Thailand), and the empire of Angkor. Ayutthaya chronicles indicate that King Ramesuan took Chiang Mai, then the capital of the kingdom of Lan Na, in 1390 and settled many captives within the kingdom of Ayutthaya.

A similar defeat of Angkor is recorded as having taken place in 1393, in response to raids from the Cambodian kingdom. He placed his son on the throne but he was soon assassinated. Neither of these battles are attested to by chronicles from Lan Na or Angkor.

title: Ramesuan (king of Ayutthaya)


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Alliance

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. CDC  (talk)  23:42, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Dark Alliance
Normally we delete secret societies because their secrecy makes them unverifiable. In this case there is one twist that might make a difference: the comment that many prominent people have been accused of being members; the accusations would be verifiable. However, there are no examples of accused prominent people in the article currently. Google gets swamped with alternate meanings for "Dark Alliance" when I try to check so I can't prove this is a commonly referenced secret 'society'. If we can't document the accusations of membership in this organization then it should be deleted. RJFJR 02:42, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable, likely hoax. I don't believe even such accusations would be encyclopedic. A и D я 01D  TALK  EMAIL  02:54, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nearly every google hit for "Dark alliance" + freemasonry is for websites dealing with a series of articles on crack cocaine done by the San Jose Mercury News entitled 'Dark Alliance' or for websites dealing with conspiracy theories. The only website I could find that in any way dealt with a group of Freemasons called Dark Alliance is this: http://www.media.org.hk/messageboard/asp/ctv001/title1.asp?Page=3 however it is in Cantonese so I dont know what it says. Im almost 100% this is a hoax. -CunningLinguist 03:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article is too vague ("many high profile individuals") and does not assert notability. michael 03:21, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. --Xcali 05:57, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable. --bainer (talk) 08:44, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete yep, unverifiable. --Etacar11 23:50, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete maybe someday if it become famous we can include it. Pufferfish101 04:11, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.


text:
Talk:Slayer (Guilty Gear)

"Spread Your Wings" is always included in the list of Slayer special moves that are named after Queen songs (along with Under Pressure, It's Late, etc.) However, this statement is the only time I have ever seen that song/move mentioned. "Spread Your Wings" is not in any Slayer move list I have seen, and when I hit Google, literally the only references it finds are people copying the "Several of Slayer's attacks (Spread Your Wings, etc) are Queen songs" statement. If Slayer actually does have a move called "Spread Your Wings," which one is it? 68.35.130.224 01:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

I like how Slayer's dust attack isn't anything wacky or overpowered; he just swings his fist and KLUDD! :D Yar Kramer 02:42, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Simple yet refined, that's our Slayer. ;) RTL 28 June 2005 04:59 (UTC)

I'll add in the BDC stuff because that technical feature essentially defines Slayer's advanced fighting style. -RTL 10 June 2005 (UTC)

Is it just me, or does Slayer give off a real David Bowie feel? Anyone got any insight on this? --Paul Soth 03:17, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

 * I dunno anything about David Bowie, but for some reason I imagined That Man as looking a bit like Slayer before I played GGXX (possibly because of the vague, tenuous resemblance of Slayer to That Man from Excel Saga). --Yar Kramer 19:08, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

I readded the biteloop information. Anyone who has even remotely played GGXX for a bit will know that his whole game was based around biting in the original GGXX. To not have that in the gameplay section would be ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.97.149.64 (talk • contribs)
 * As true as that is, it seems a little unnecessary, and adding gameplay information for every revision of the games each character was in would be ridiculous for characters that have been around since GG1. -- Digital Watches! 18:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * And yet you keep the backdash information? I agree that backdash is important, as it was a major part of his game up until slash... just like the bite loop. If anything, can't we at least expand the mention of the command throw a bit? 128.97.149.64 20:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, firstly, backdash cancelling is still used in Slash. Nerfing it doesn't make it unusable. And feel free to add information about the bite, as long as it's not entirely outdated. Digital Watches ! 20:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, both back dash cancelling and bites are rarely used in Slash anymore. If you watch any of the tourny videos from the larger Japanese arcades (gamechariot or a-cho), his regular throw is used more often than his bite and the only back dash cancel move that's still used is the back dash cancel into jumping back to get out of pressure strings. 71.106.174.147 01:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Anime Mecha Reference.
Slayer is Modeled after Impact Alberto from the Anime series Giant Robo, complete with Win pose of disappearing inside his cloak. Mimeblade 17:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Haiku.
In game, Slayer's instant kill contains a haiku, as noted in the article. However, what exactly is the haiku? Has there been any official translation to it that is verifiable? I think it'd be a nice bit of trivia to add. Wolfman Walt 21:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Slayer.gif
Image:Slayer.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SlayerSharon.jpg
Image:SlayerSharon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Slayer (Guilty Gear)


text: Category:Operas by Maurice Ravel

title: Category:Operas by Maurice Ravel


text:
User talk:69.246.95.19

Proposed deletion of Arbaaz Ali Khan

The article Arbaaz Ali Khan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arbaaz Ali Khan

The article Arbaaz Ali Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Doesn't seem to meet notability for media"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 00:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Arbaaz Ali Khan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arbaaz Ali Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arbaaz Ali Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 16:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:69.246.95.19


text:
How We Do (song)

"How We Do" is a song by American rapper and West Coast hip hop artist the Game, featuring rapper 50 Cent from his debut album, The Documentary. Produced by Dr. Dre and Mike Elizondo, it was released as the album's second official single in late 2004.

"How We Do" achieved commercial success worldwide. The track peaked within the top 10 in multiple countries, including the United Kingdom, Ireland, Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany and New Zealand. The single was commercially successful in the United States, peaking at number 4 on the Billboard Hot 100 and remaining on the chart for 28 consecutive weeks. "How We Do" marked Game's first top-ten single on the chart as a lead artist and also marked 50 Cent's fifth overall top-ten single.

Commercial success
The song was a hit at Urban and Rhythmic radio stations in America, and was a success on American mainstream pop music radio stations. In the U.S., the song debuted at number 65 and peaked at number 4 on the Billboard Hot 100 in early 2005, making it the Game's first top-five hit. The song was also certified Gold by the RIAA.

The song fell down the charts relatively quickly for a top-ten hit. This was likely due to an overabundance of Shady/Aftermath/G-Unit-related singles all competing for airtime during this time period, as Eminem and G-Unit members 50 Cent, Lloyd Banks, Young Buck, and Game all had songs on the chart during the months of late 2004 and early 2005. However, despite its fast fall out of the top twenty, the song managed to hang on in the lower rungs of the top 40 for months, in spite of, or possibly because of, the Game's follow up, "Hate It or Love It" becoming even bigger on pop radio only a few weeks after "How We Do" had peaked. Dr. Dre had produced "How We Do" during his time in G-Unit.

Music video
The music video was directed by Hype Williams; it features cameos by Dr. Dre, Olivia, Michael K. Williams as well as DJ Quik. It showcases night shots of Los Angeles; as well as a Dodge Magnum, driven by the Game, and a Cadillac Escalade, driven by 50 Cent; as it finally cuts to a nightclub. DJ Quik can be briefly seen towards the end, raising a glass of champagne. The music video on YouTube has received over 215 million views as of April 2024.

A-side

 * "How We Do (edited)" (4:03)

B-side

 * "How We Do (edited)" (4:03)
 * "How We Do (explicit)" (4:20)
 * "How We Do (instrumental)" (4:04)
 * "How We Do (a cappella)" (3:01)

title: How We Do (song)


text:
German Constitutional Court abortion decision, 1975

BVerfGE 39,1 — Abortion I (BVerfGE 39,1 — Schwangerschaftsabbruch I) was a decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, addressing the issue of abortion in 1975, two years after the United States Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade. The Court held that respect for human dignity requires the criminalization of abortion if it is not justified by imperative reasons called "indications" ("Indikationen"). There are several indications, most notably the medical indication, meaning that the life of the mother would be at risk if she had to carry the child to term, and the criminal indication, meaning that the child is the result of the mother being raped.

The decision considered the full range of arguments for legal abortion, both early (legalization had been a topic of debate in Germany since the turn of the century) and recent (used in other countries such as the United States and Britain that legalized abortion several years before). In particular, it specifically rejected the main points of reasoning in Roe v. Wade, as well as its "term solution", as inconsistent with the constitutional guarantee of the right to life. The Court held that the right to life, as guaranteed by Article 2, Paragraph 2, of the Basic Law, must extend to the life of the unborn when read in the light of the guarantee of human dignity, as laid out in Article 1 of the Basic Law.

The reunification of Germany resulted in a significant revision of abortion laws, which liberalized them in many respects, although leaving them more restrictive than the East German laws which permitted abortion upon demand during the first twelve weeks of pregnancy. In the early 1990s, the Bundestag implemented a system where a woman having an abortion during the first three months of her pregnancy does not face legal sanctions if she undergoes mandatory counseling which has as one of its goals to present the case that the developing fetus is an independent human life, and obeys a 72-hour waiting period between counseling and the abortion. Later abortions are not punishable if medical reasons, such as possible harm to the woman from continued pregnancy, or a severely deformed fetus, indicate so.

In a second judgment in 1993, the Federal Constitutional Court struck down the 1992 relaxed restrictions on abortion. The Court considered that the defense of the unborn human beings' right to life necessarily implies prohibition. While penal measurements are needed, the constitutional mandate to protect unborn life can also include social, political, and welfare means. Therefore, the legislator removed the statement, that the unpunished abortion within twelve weeks would not be illegal, from the law.


text:
ITE

ITE or Ite may refer to:

Places

 * Ite (village), Walloon name of the Belgian village of Ittre
 * Ite District in Tacna Region, Peru

Brands and enterprises

 * Interactive Television Entertainment (ITE), a defunct Danish media company
 * ITE Group, an organiser of exhibitions and conferences
 * ITE Tech, a fabless semiconductor company from Taiwan

Computing and technology

 * If-then-else, conditional expressions in computer programming
 * In-the-ear (ITE) hearing aids
 * Information technology equipment (ITE)
 * Integrated Transcription Environment, a class of transcription software

Organizations

 * Institute of Technical Education (Singapore)
 * Institute of Transportation Engineers
 * L’Internationale des Travailleurs de l’Enseignement, a predecessor organization of the World Federation of Teachers Unions (FISE)

Science

 * "Ité", another name for the Moriche Palm (Mauritia flexuosa)
 * -ite, a suffix for a chemical name of a molecule with one less oxygen atom than an "-ate" molecule

Other uses

 * Inherit the Earth (ITE), a video game
 * -ite, a suffix meaning member of or resident of, e.g., New Jerseyite

title: ITE


text:
User talk:Moxie~enwiki

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Cyberjunkie 02:45, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Moxie. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Moxie~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moxie~enwiki


text: Category:Mazes

title: Category:Mazes