text:
Talk:Torah scroll

Writing a Sefer Torah
It would be good to have a section describing the merit of writing a Sefer Torah. It would be of particular benefit to those trying to raise funds for a Sefer from the general population. Pachai 15:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC) seth@pachai.net

Usage section
In the "Usage" section, Sefer Torah, it says: And then, you look on the right hand side of the page, and what's there? Some imbecile with his sweaty finger on the text! I'm not going to comment any further on this gross mistreatment of the sefer (by which I mean I just deleted my rant), but the image clearly conflicts with the (correct) text. The image is also questionable, since it says at that it comes from, which hmmm, inconvenience of inconveniences, doesn't seem to have the image (anymore?). (I searched there for "torah", "torahscroll", "sefer" and "scroll".) Tomer TALK  05:50, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * During cantillation, following the often dense text is aided by a yad ("hand"), a metal finger-shaped point that protects the scrolls by avoiding unnecessary contact of the skin with the parchment.

This page definitely needs a different image. No image at all would be better than a picture of someone directly touching the scroll with their hand. The picture conflicts with what is written in the article. Anyone who cares about Torah scrolls would be offended by that picture. Anyone who is ignorant about Torah scrolls would be confused by the picture. delete it! Onethang 02:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps the Usage section should come before the Production section? My reasoning is, "Tadir", in order of frequency...a Sefer is used 4 times/week, 17-18 times/month...whereas, an ordinary person might write just one in his lifetime if he is lucky....then, there could be a segue of some sort, explaining Dedication.

Pachai 16:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Security

 * Kevin Poulsen (June 6, 2005). New Tech Protects Ancient Torahs. Wired.  An article about two new security systems to protect agains Torah theft.  Possibly this would be an interesting topic to cover in the article.  dbenbenn | talk 18:22, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Torah portion
Torah portion does not belong on this page; it's irrelevant (and too long btw).—msh210 ℠ 19:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Hi msh: (1) The Sefer Torah is divided into 54 portions, known as Parshas (parshiyot) and each week's Torah reading of a Parsha (Torah portion) is read directly from a Sefer Torah scroll in synagogue on Shabbat, as well as on Monday and Thursday mornings. (2) The template Torah portion is at the bottom of the Sefer Torah article's page, so essentially it's part of the "See also" section which is a legitimate way of connecting related and connected topics on an article. (3) If a reader finds the Torah portion to be "too intrusive" then any reader is free to click "Hide" on the top right section of the template's heading which shrinks it to an unobtrusive one liner. Finally, (4) the Torah portion is presently diligently updated weekly by User:Dauster early each Sunday so that any readers may learn more about the weekly Parsha. User:Dauster summarizes each week's Parsha and adds some interesting graphics which surely adds life and color to a page that may gain the attention of readers who don't know much about this subject and may want to learn more. Please refer all further comments and discussions to one centralized location at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism Thank you. IZAK 07:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Merge?
Should this page be merged or linked with the Torah page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pachai (talk • contribs).
 * Of course not. Torah is for the five books. - crz crztalk 16:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

"Non-scroll book"
"The text of the Torah is also commonly printed (for non-ritual functions) as a (non-scroll) book, known as a Humash ("five", for the five books of Moses), often accompanied by commentaries or translations." If I understand correctly, the word the article writer was looking for is codex. If this is the case, the correct word (with wikilinking to help readers unfamiliar with the word) would make the sentence clearer. I'd make the change myself, but am unfamiliar with the intricacies of Torahs. Does anyone with better knowledge than mine know of a shade of meaning I'm missing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.52.69.217 (talk) 16:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Edited. Kindly change it back if there is, in fact, a distinction I'm not aware of.

halacha
Where are the references to halachic sources?--Mrg3105 11:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

A source or reference as to why klaf/parchment is required would be useful as well. The article simply states that to be a fact without giving the source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.68.93 (talk) 18:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

errors over centuries
I recall learning that a comparison of the oldest and newest torahs shows a total of five characters having changed over the last 3000 years or so, showing a fairly strong fidelity over numerous copies. Is this the article to add it to, and can someone more familiar do so?ThuranX (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Capitalization
The object in question is variously referred to in the article as both a "sefer Torah" and a "Sefer Torah." Italicization is also inconsistent. What should be used? --Shay Guy (talk) 20:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

I would prefer Sefer Torah, italicized. ypnypn (talk) 02:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

What are "ornamentations?"
Are they taggim? Maimonides holds that a sefer Torah does not need taggim to begin with. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Octologue (talk • contribs) 21:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Repair / disposal of the sefer Torah
Hello everyone. If it would be of value, could someone add a section on repair of the sefer Torah, or the proper means of disposal when it can no longer be repaired? I'm neither Jewish nor a scholar of Judaism, so I can't provide the text myself. Kind regards, Notreallydavid (talk) 00:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Silk screen Sifrei Torah - new section
There should be a section here about silk screen sifrei torah, which the reknowned posek Rav Yitzchok Abadi said is good for "mehadrin min hamihadrin", and many other poskim agree  http://kashrut.org/scrollproject/.

This process produces beautiful sifrei torah for a third of the price.

Arrangement of right-hand margin
It seems that there is an extreme excess of photographs (eight, at last count). This, in addition to the side Navbox, means that there is a lot of empty article space with nothing but right-hand photos. This must be solved. ypnypn (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Arrangement of right-hand margin
It seems that there is an extreme excess of photographs (eight, at last count). This, in addition to the side Navbox, means that there is a lot of empty article space with nothing but right-hand photos. This must be solved. ypnypn (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

"Oldest Complete Torah Scroll"
Fyi, Oldest Complete Torah Scroll Found in Bologna,. 86.171.162.156 (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

 * End of 12th century. Good to know. Missing from the article. Arminden (talk) 16:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Sifrei torah?
In proper hebrew shouldn't the correct plural for sefer be "sfarim" ? There should be an explanation on the origin of this unusual form (of course I guess it's from Yiddisch, but why the unusual form anyway?) --Svartalf (talk) 14:10, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

 * this is what's called a construct state. GordonGlottal (talk) 16:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Torah shield
This article (nor Torah article) does not mention the Torah shields, kind of silver plates with name of the reading. Could that be added? --Agatino Catarella (talk) 10:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sefer Torah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711145829/http://www.hasoferet.com/ritual/ms/letterforms.shtml to http://www.hasoferet.com/ritual/ms/letterforms.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709184728/http://www.saad.org.il/elihu/bereshit/bereshit.html to http://www.saad.org.il/elihu/bereshit/bereshit.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Please use ENGLISH, not a yeshiva mix of Hebrew and English
Arminden (talk) 08:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Even the Chabad article explaining the term uses the English name. This "Sefer Torah" thing on English Wikipedia is worse than ridiculous. More Orthodox than Chabad. They're out there in the world missionising, and know when you lose your public if you don't speak in an intelligible manner. Here I am, praising Chabad, may I burn (my toe in the shower) over that, and the Wiki fundamentalists along with my toe. Arminden (talk) 09:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Since when have complete Torah scrolls been produced?
Not collections of scrolls, stored and read separately, but a more or less "complete" scroll, with all the first five books of the Hebrew Bible on parchment sheets sawn together into one single scroll? I'm not asking for the oldest copy that happened to survive (the Bologna scroll), nor for the year Moses put pen to paper, but for a scholarly opinion/theory/fact about the beginning of the practice. Thanks! PS: I need to explain my question. The Dead Sea Scrolls are one indication that the different books making up the Torah were produced and kept separately, at least sometimes, and until some time in history; was it the rule? Or were they used for study, while the Torah for worship was complete? Did the Temple priests need a Torah for worship? If not, and this is the core of my question, were synagogues using complete Torah scrolls while the Temple was still standing? If so, since when; and if not, when did the syagogues introduce this practice? So when did the practice of sawing 5 books together into one scroll come up? I expect there to be some indication in, say, the Talmud or later Jewish sources. I suppose practicing Orthodox Jews would say that this was the only way ever since Moses wrote down his 5 books, and while it would be interesting to have this confirmed, this wouldn't be the answer I am loooking for. Thank you and cheers, Arminden (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC) I found & added a first answer: not before 4th c. CE. Important. Please don't remove, add if you know/find more. Arminden (talk) 06:39, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

CONTENT needs to be clearly stated
Oposite to the opinion of Editor2020, I am 100% convinced that the lead must contain, prominently, an explanation of the content of such a scroll. Why? Just click on wikilink Tora and read: it can also mean the entire Hebrew Bible, and even more. The definition is totally incomplete here w/o specifying: a Torah scroll contains the Pentateuch, the five Books of Moses. Define your topic, clearly and in a complete manner, is the first duty of an editor to an enyclopaedia. Imagining that, c'mon, the user must know that much, is a big mistake. He doesn't. Cheers, Arminden (talk) 06:39, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Jasher / Jashar?
Unless I am remembering incorrectly, other articles refer to this as a possible interpretation of "book of Jasher" / "book of Jashar" which is in the Tanakh in two places. But there is nothing in the article about "Jash...". Can someone more-knowledgable add this, please? Thank you! Misty MH (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Move to proper English name, Torah scroll
Nobody brought any counterarguments to my almost 5 years old post (see above). Starting procedure to move page to Torah scroll, the appropriate name on English Wiki. Arminden (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 9 March 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 03:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Sefer Torah → Torah scroll – English Wiki prescribes the use of English terms when widely known and used frequently for centuries, such as Torah scroll, rather than original-language ones, such as Sefer Torah. The article must be renamed accordingly. For that purpose, the redirect blocking the move must be removed. Arminden (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

 * Support. Srnec (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

 * I don't object to this change but noting that (in re WP:RECENT) "torah scroll" only overtook "sefer torah" in 2012 according to Ngram. GordonGlottal (talk) 22:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ngrams is case sensitive. Srnec (talk) 22:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't know much about these tools, but there is certainly a "ghetto phenomenon" behind what you're saying: there always would be more people close to the subject to look up details, but if the encyclopedia doesn't remain open and useful to everybody, it misses its purpose. We'd end up with only people who know some Hebrew finding their way around Judaism topics, Arab speakers around Islam, and so forth. But the encyclopedia as a concept has always been a universalist project, and wide access within the limits of not steeping too low in terms of educational requirements beats supporting and pushing particularist jargons. Simply put, old and well-established English terms must be preferred over foreign ones which aren't widely accepted loanwords. For those we have redirects and special sections about names and etymology. Arminden (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

title: Talk:Torah scroll


text:
SPECint

SPEC INT is a computer benchmark specification for CPU integer processing power. It is maintained by the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). SPEC INT is the integer performance testing component of the SPEC test suite. The first SPEC test suite, CPU92, was announced in 1992. It was followed by CPU95, CPU2000, and CPU2006. The latest standard is SPEC CPU 2017 and consists of SPEC speed and SPEC rate (aka SPECCPU_2017).

SPEC INT 2006
CPU2006 is a set of benchmarks designed to test the CPU performance of a modern server computer system. It is split into two components, the first being CINT2006, the other being CFP2006 (SPECfp), for floating point testing.

SPEC defines a base runtime for each of the 12 benchmark programs. For SPECint2006, that number ranges from 1000 to 3000 seconds. The timed test is run on the system, and the time of the test system is compared to the reference time, and a ratio is computed. That ratio becomes the SPEC INT score for that test. (This differs from the rating in SPECINT2000, which multiplies the ratio by 100.)

As an example for SPECint2006, consider a processor which can run 400.perlbench in 2000 seconds. The time it takes the reference machine to run the benchmark is 9770 seconds. Thus the ratio is 4.885. Each ratio is computed, and then the geometric mean of those ratios is computed to produce an overall value.

Background
For a fee, SPEC distributes source code files to users wanting to test their systems. These files are written in a standard programming language, which is then compiled for each particular CPU architecture and operating system. Thus, the performance measured is that of the CPU, RAM, and compiler, and does not test I/O, networking, or graphics.

Two metrics are reported for a particular benchmark, "base" and "peak". Compiler options account for the difference between the two numbers. As the SPEC benchmarks are distributed as source code, it is up to the party performing the test to compile this code. There is agreement that the benchmarks should be compiled in the same way as a user would compile a program, but there is no consistent method for user compilation, it varies system by system. SPEC, in this case, defines two reference points, "base" and "peak". Base has a more strict set of compilation rules than peak. Less optimization can be done, the compiler flags must be the same for each benchmark, in the same order, and there must be a limited number of flags. Base, then, is closest to how a user would compile a program with standard flags. The 'peak' metric can be performed with maximum compiler optimization, even to the extent of different optimizations for each benchmark. This number represents maximum system performance, achieved by full compiler optimization.

SPEC INT tests are carried out on a wide range of hardware, with results typically published for the full range of system-level implementations employing the latest CPUs. For SPECint2006, the CPUs include Intel and AMD x86 & x86-64 processors, Sun SPARC CPUs, IBM Power CPUs, and IA-64 CPUs. This range of capabilities, specifically in this case the number of CPUs, means that the SPEC INT benchmark is usually run on only a single CPU, even if the system has many CPUs. If a single CPU has multiple cores, only a single core is used; hyper-threading is also typically disabled,

A more complete system-level benchmark that allows all CPUs to be used is known as SPECint_rate2006, also called "CINT2006 Rate".

Benchmarks
The SPECint2006 test suite consists of 12 benchmark programs, designed to test exclusively the integer performance of the system.

The benchmarks are:

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: SPECint


text:
Diocese (disambiguation)

Term Diocese may refer to:

 * Roman diocese, administrative unit from the period of late Roman Empire.
 * Diocese, ecclesiastical unit of various Christian churches.

title: Diocese (disambiguation)


text:
User:Noypi380

Hey, WikiMedia is the bomb.

Herodotus is one of my idols. I enjoy writing stuff, especially unique eyewitness stuff.

Hey guys, I received an award! Thanks so much to Spangineer, coz now I am more motivated to write, yeah!

Tips on how to win the award that I just won, heehee
Read first the following articles before writing your first article.

 * Tutorial
 * The Manual of Style
 * NPOV - (Very important, :-)
 * Be Bold
 * Wikiquette
 * Policies and Guidelines
 * How to write a great article
 * Adding some images to your articles

These articles really helped me alot.

title: User:Noypi380


text:
Kharga Oasis

The Kharga Oasis (الخارجة, ) lit. 'the outer'; , "Oasis of Hib",   "Oasis of Psoi") is the southernmost of Egypt's five western oases. It is located in the Western Desert, about 200 km (125 miles) to the west of the Nile valley. "Kharga" or "El Kharga" is also the name of a major town located in the oasis, the capital of New Valley Governorate. The oasis, which was known as the 'Southern Oasis' to the Ancient Egyptians, the 'outer' (he Esotero) to the Greeks and Oasis Magna to the Romans, is the largest of the oases in the Libyan desert of Egypt. It is in a depression about 160 km (100 miles) long and from 20 km (12 miles) to 80 km (50 miles) wide. Its population is 67,700 (2012).

Overview
Kharga is the most modernised of Egypt's western oases. The main town is highly functional with all modern facilities, and virtually nothing left of old architecture. Although framed by the oasis, there is no oasis feeling to it, unlike all other oases in this part of Egypt. There is extensive thorny date palm, acacia, buffalo thorn, and jujube growth in the oasis surrounding the modern town of Kharga. Many remnant wildlife species inhabit this region.

Climate
The Köppen-Geiger climate classification system classifies its climate as hot desert (BWh). Kharga Oasis experiences extreme summers for most of the year with no precipitation and warm winters with cool nights.

Darb El Arba'īn caravan route

A trade route called Darb El Arba'īn ("the Way of Forty") passed through Kharga as part of a long caravan route running north–south between Middle Egypt and the Sudan. The ancient route connected the Al-Fashir area of Sudan to Asyut in Egypt, navigating through a chain of oases including Kharga, Selima Oasis and Bir Natrun.

At least 700 years old, it was likely used from as early as the Old Kingdom of Egypt for the transport and trade of gold, ivory, spices, wheat, animals and plants.

The maximum extent of Darb El Arba'īn was northward from Kobbei in Darfur (located about 25 miles north of al-Fashir) passing through the desert, through Bir Natrum and Wadi Howar, and ending at the Nile River access point of Asyut in Egypt. This is a journey of approximately 1800 km. The desert route was less expensive and safer than the more visually appealing Nile route.

All the oases have always been crossroads of caravan routes converging from the barren desert. In the case of Kharga, this is made particularly evident by the presence of a chain of fortresses that the Romans built to protect the Darb El Arba'īn route. The forts vary in size and function, some being just small outposts, some guarding large settlements complete with cultivation. Some were installed where earlier settlements already existed, while others were probably started from scratch. All of them are made of mud bricks, but some also contain small stone temples with inscriptions on the walls.

Described by Herodotus as a road "traversed…in forty days," by his time the route had already become an important land route facilitating trade between Nubia and Egypt. The length of the journey is the reason for it being called Darb El Arba`īn, the implication being "the forty-day road".

After the prominent Christian theologian Nestorius was condemned as a heretic in the 431 Council of Ephesus, he was removed from his position as Patriarch of Constantinople and exiled to a monastery then located in the Great Oasis of Hibis (El Kharga). There he lived for the rest of his life. The monastery suffered attacks by desert bandits, and Nestorius was injured in one such raid. Nestorius seems to have survived there until at least 450 and there had composed the Bazaar of Heracleides—the only one of writings to survive in full, and of importance to the Christian Nestorians who follow his teachings.

As part of a caravan proceeding to Darfur, the English explorer W.G. Browne paused for several days at Kharga, leaving with the rest of the group 7 June 1793. At the time a gindi (a Turkish horseman, that performs extraordinary feats) was stationed at Kharga, "belonging to Ibrahim Bey El Kebir, to whom those villages appertain; and to [this official] is entrusted the management of what relates to the caravan during the time of its stay there."

In 1930 the archaeologist, Gertrude Caton–Thompson, uncovered the palaeolithic history of Kharga.

Demographics
In his diary, “Al-Hajj Al-Bari” mentioned the most important families descending of Christians and Romans in the Kharga Oasis. They are the families of “Al-Jawiya, the families of Al-Tawayh, the Al-Bahramah family, the Al-Sanadiyah family, the Al-Azayza family, the Al-Badayrah family, the Al-Mahbasiya family, the Al-Hosnieh family, and the Al-Na’imah family And the Al-Sharayra family, and there are Nubian families in the village of Baris. There are few Berber families too who are thought to be the indigenous people of Kharga but the majority today are Arab families.

Perhaps the most important of these Arab families that came to the Khargha Oasis from the beginning of the year 300 AH are the families of the Idris from Tunisia or Libya, the family of Rekabia and the family of the jewehera from the Hijaz and the family of shakawera and the family of Al-Radawana and the family from the Arabs of Mecca and the family of Al-Shawami from the Levant and there are families from the countries of the Egyptian country such as Dabatiya and Asawiya from Assiut Or Sohag and the Awlad-el-sheikh from Egypt “It is more likely to mean Cairo”, the family of Njarin from Qalamoun in Dakhla, the family of Al Shaabna from Mallawi, the family of Al-Awamir from Al-Amayem tribe and the family of Al-Alawneh from Al-Alawiya in addition to Turkish families such as Al-Dabashiya, Al-Tarakah Al-Kharja and the Bash families The Qaqamqam, Askari, Tannabur, Qitas, and Kashif.

Transportation
A regular bus service connects the oasis to the other Western oases and to the rest of Egypt. In 1907, the narrow gauge Western Oasis Lines provided twice-weekly train services. A standard gauge railway line Kharga → Qena (Nile Valley) → Port Safaga (Red Sea) has been in service since 1996, but has been decommissioned soon after.

Archaeological sites
The Temple of Hibis is a Saite-era temple founded by Psamtik II, which was erected largely c. 500 BC. It is located about 2 kilometres north of modern Kharga, in a palm-grove. There is a second 1st millennium BC temple in the southernmost part of the oasis at Dush. An ancient Christian cemetery at El Bagawat also functioned at the Kharga Oasis from the 3rd to the 7th century AD. It is one of the earliest and best preserved Christian cemeteries in the ancient world.

The first list of sites is due to Ahmad Fakhri but serious archaeological work began in 1976 with Serge Sauneron, director of the Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale.

 * Sites
 * Ain El Beleida (Roman)
 * Ain El Labakha (Roman)
 * Ain Manawir (Persian, Roman)
 * Ain Shams El Din (Coptic church)
 * Ain El Tarakwa (Roman)
 * Ain Tauleib (Roman)
 * Deir Mustafa Kashef (Coptic monastery)
 * Deir El Munira (Roman)
 * Gabbanat El Bagawat (Coptic cemetery)
 * Gebel El Teir (Prehistoric times)
 * El Nadura (Roman)
 * Qasr El Dabashiya (Roman)
 * Qasr Dush (Greco-Roman)
 * Qasr El Ghuweita (Late Period)
 * Qasr El Gibb (Roman)
 * Qasr El Zayyan (Greco-Roman)
 * Sumeira (Roman)
 * Temple of Hibis (Persian - c. 6th century BC.)
 * Umm El Dabadib (Roman)
 * Umm Mawagir (Middle Kingdom, 2nd Intermediate Period)

Meteorite dagger
In June 2016, a report emerged that attributed the dagger buried with Pharaoh Tutankhamun to an iron meteorite, with similar proportions of metals (iron, nickel and cobalt) to one discovered near and named after Kharga Oasis. The dagger's metal was presumably from the same meteor shower.

title: Kharga Oasis


text:
Talk:Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739)

Too much propaganda. This article has to be rewritten. (unsigned by anon)
 * Please be more specific, or just go ahead and rewrite it. -Irpen 06:30, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

 * One can but agree with anon. Let me be more specific about the propaganda!! This article has been joined with the article on the 1735-1739 Austria-Ottoman Wars and totally ignores the Austrian advances and then a series of defeats, just giving in a single sentence on a series of disastrous defeats. The defeats of the Austrian armies at Bucharest, Battle of Banja Luka (August 1737) and further at Battle of Grocka (July 1739) and the retaking by Ottomans of Belgrade after a siege are totally missed.Noyder (talk) 18:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

IP 85.103.29.87's opinion of "Ottoman victory"
I would like to see the source(s) for this "Ottoman victory" that the IP 85.103.29.87 has edit-warred into the article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Sources failing WP:V
Three journal articles used as sources do not appear in the journals listed.

As seen here. There is no article by Aksan, Virginia H. "The Ottoman Empire and the Russian Frontier, 1739-1742." The International History Review 11, no. 3 (1989): 481-502. Instead:
 * Women Shipyard Workers in the Second World War: A Note (pp. 478-485)
 * Deborah Scott Hirshfield
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/40106045

As seen here or here There is no article by Fisher, Alan W. "The Russo-Turkish War of 1735-1739 " The Slavonic and East European Review 37, no. 90 (1959): 321-339. Instead:
 * The Concept of the Poet in Pasternak (pp. 325-335)
 * Victor Erlich
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/4205060

As seen here there is no article by Kafadar, Cemal. "The Ottoman Empire in the Eighteenth Century: Tradition and Change in a Muslim Society." The Journal of Asian Studies 41, no. 3 (1982): 561-583. Instead:
 * Early Southeast Asia: Old Wine in New Skins?--A Review Article (pp. 559-570)
 * Early Southeast Asia: Essays in Archaeology, History and Historical Geography. by R. B. Smith, W. Watson
 * Review by: Karl L. Hutterer
 * https://doi.org/10.2307/2055253
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/2055253

These sources; contain no page numbers therefore fail WP:V.
 * Ortaylı, İlber. The Ottoman Empire and the World Around It.
 * Davies, Norman. Europe: A History.
 * The Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire, 1710-1922, by Alexander Shlyapnikov.
 * The Russo-Turkish Wars of the Eighteenth Century, by Richard B. Spence.
 * The Romanovs: 1613-1918, by Simon Sebag Montefiore.

A clarification of said journal articles, page numbers for the books and quotes from all these sources will resolve this issue.--Kansas Bear (talk) 02:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Infobox results
I amended the infobox per Template:Infobox_military_conflict, which states results need to be either x victory or inconclusive. If the results do not fit into those parameters, the article should instead link to the aftermath in the text body. Annwfwn (talk) 12:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739)


text:
Triple Crown of Surfing

The Triple Crown of Surfing is a specialty series of professional surfing events that have been held annually since 1983 on the North Shore of Oahu, a coastline whose winter swells can reach 50 ft in height.

The Triple Crown was founded by former World Champion (1968) Fred Hemmings, and Randy Rarick, who produced the Triple Crown events. The Series came under Vans' ownership in 1998.

The three venues of Haleiwa, Sunset, and Pipeline are the last three major events of the professional surfing season; the Pipe Masters being the final event of the World Surf League Championship Tour up until 2020 when it became the first event of the 2020-21 wraparound season in December 2020.

In 2020, under challenges of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the series went fully digital. Surfers had from December 21, 2020, to January 15, 2021, to upload their two best video clips from each of the three venues. The women's division returned to Pipeline. The digital Vans Triple Crown of Surfing awarded individual location titles for Haleiwa, Sunset and Pipeline, as well as overall Vans Triple Crown champion titles to the top performing man and woman across all three locations, with a total prize purse of $200,000 split equally among men and women. There was also a digital Fan Vote title, for fan favorites, for the first time. The Pipeline event is not to be confused with the 2020 Pipeline Masters tournament that was held to start the 2020-21 wraparound season.

The events are:
 * The Hawaiian Pro at Haleiwa Ali'i Beach Park (Nov. 12 - Nov. 24)
 * The World Cup of Surfing at Sunset Beach (Nov. 25 - Dec. 6)
 * The Pipeline Masters at Ehukai Beach Park (in Pūpūkea, and home to the Banzai Pipeline) (Dec. 8 - Dec. 20).

In addition to individual event champions, the Vans Triple Crown of Surfing crowns an overall champion each year. This goes to the surfer who has performed best across all three competitions.

title: Triple Crown of Surfing


text:
Talk:Mannequin

Art crap
Whyd you delete my paragraph about art mannequins being different and made of wooden pegs sometimes? The peg thing is important! KM

About history
If someone is more knowledgable about this than I, please post something about the history of mannequins! Thanks!

umm ok..? What kind of history were you planning? (like who had the idea of mannequins or something) KM

Vandalism from port 216.167.223.145 once more
Are we dealing with this at all? I researched the port number and it seems they've been doing this all over the web. The time of entry 19:01 on the fourteenth Central US time from MN points to someone out of the school district pretty late at night. That is if its actually coming from there. Can we just prevent that location from editing again?Vinegartom 05:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

What?
"...group of mutilated mannequins is found at a suspect's house, causing the protagonist (and reader) to believe the suspect to be the shark..."

Because mannequins (excluding me) don't move, so people think its a shark. KM

Mannequin as synonym for Model
I remember seeing "mannequin" used as a synonym for a fashion model in a novel set in the late edwardian or the twenties. I don't remember it as having a derogatory connotation. 70.71.69.221 10:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Mannequin was used as a synonym for model because we model things, much like human models. KM

Prices for mannequins
Back in the early 1970s, my father rented out an entire floor of a building to a store that did nothing but manufacture and market life-sized mannequins. The typical buyer was a department store that needed mannequins to dress up in clothes that were for sale. Back then, a mannequin had a variety of prices, but the one price I can remember, was $500 US Dollars. The main article could be improved by talking about the various prices commanded by a mannequin. 216.99.201.156 (talk) 18:32, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

History?
Do they have a history even? 207.224.18.33 (talk) 07:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Of course! KM

Lack of Information
I feel as if this article lacks technical information, such the type of materials the mannequins are made of, the manufacturing process, how much they weigh, whether they're hollow or filled, etc. Also, there is no information about the artist's mannequins - apart from the picture. A section on them would be helpful too, and a history of mannequins would also be great in addition to the etymology. This entire article, the way it currently is, seems to be about badmouthing mannequins about how they're perceived as "creepy" by society, and used in works of fiction as such. 220.253.185.76 (talk) 07:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Spelling
In addition to the standard spelling, I've also seen the term spelled "mannikin" and "manikin". Merriam-Webster (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mannequin) seems to indicate both of those are acceptable (it doesn't say they're misspellings). Should they be included in the article?

If it seems official, go ahead. KM

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mannequin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070328200316/http://www.crme.med.miami.edu/harvey_findings.html to http://www.crme.med.miami.edu/harvey_findings.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mannequin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121027011714/http://www.chinastrategies.com/List.htm to http://www.chinastrategies.com/list.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Ghost mannequin and ironing mannequins
To include in the article:
 * What is a ghost mannequin?.
 * Infatable mannequins : i.e. http://www.inflatablemannequins.com/items/Inflatable-Mannequins-By-Type/Leg-Forms/list.htm
 * Waht is an ironing mannequin and how it works (infatable)?:
 * https://www.tubie.de/
 * https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XB9S3FV/ref=ox_sc_saved_title_1?smid=A2GQFTQ34ANTHZ&psc=1
 * and so on.

It would be very interesting create an article about automatic ironing or ironing robots or both.--BoldLuis (talk) 13:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

inflatable, ghost and ironing mannequins aren't 'mainstream' (as in popular) and I don't really see a section in this page where they could fit. KM

Joel
What’s a manaquin ? 2601:152:4300:BA20:800D:4EEC:120A:85F4 (talk) 00:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

English gentleman, living together with a lifeless mannequin
Do somebody in Wikipedialand knows the name of the British TV-movie in which a well-to-do English gentleman is living together with a lifeless mannequin which he calls "Helen"? It is a very weird movie. This gentleman is always performing fruitless telephone calls from his office, to know if his "Helen" is at home or not. There is (understandable) never an answer at the other end of the line, and he (the gentleman) is always in panic. Each day he is driving homeward to know what's wrong with "Helen" and why she doesn't answer the telephone. As far as I can remember, this gentleman could have been the British actor Richard Briers, but it is too long ago (it might have been on BBC TV somewhere in the eighties or early nineties). It would be very interesting to include the name of this weird British TV-movie into this article! DannyCaes (talk) 14:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mannequin


text:
Talk:Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681)

Comments
Too much propaganda. (unsigned by anon)05:57, 9 June 2005 81.213.13.241 (Talk)
 * Please be more specific, or just go ahead and rewrite it. -Irpen 06:30, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

The result of this war is Ottoman victory. Ottoman Empire captured Chyryhyn 8 years long. Petro The Great took again in second Russo Türkish War 1686 1700. We would be happy when you revert it to Ottoman victory from indecisive. Thank you i have also link with Ottoman victory Historiker123454 (talk) 09:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Ottoman Took Chyryhyn 8 years along unter 1684. İt is over time of War (1676 1681) Hakan255 (talk) 08:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Ottoman Took Chyryhyn 8 years along until 1684. İt is over time of War (1676 1681) Hakan255 (talk) 08:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Ottoman took Chyryhyn From 1678 until 1686 (I Corrected it) Hakan255 (talk) 08:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

@-Irpen it's more that you are Russian. Hakan255 (talk) 23:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please refrain from making comments concerning the ethnicity of other editors. Consider this your only warning concerning this issue.
 * Also, please post a quote and page number from that "source" you posted in the article that states "Ottoman victory". --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007.

Page 172.

@Kansas Bear Hakan255 (talk) 16:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Regulation
Please edit according to the Turkish version of:

http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warlordcry (talk • contribs) 15:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Moves?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: nomination withdrawn. Jenks24 (talk) 15:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) → Russo–Turkish War (1676–1681)
 * Russo-Turkish War (1686–1700) → Russo–Turkish War (1686–1700)
 * Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774) → Russo–Turkish War (1768–1774)
 * Russo-Turkish War (1787–1792) → Russo–Turkish War (1787–1792)
 * Russo-Turkish War (1806–1812) → Russo–Turkish War (1806–1812)
 * Russo-Turkish War (1828–1829) → Russo–Turkish War (1828–1829)
 * Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878) → Russo–Turkish War (1877–1878)
 * Move according to WP:MoS > MoS:PUNCT > MoS:HYPHEN & MoS:DASH. – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think the hyphen is correct here because "Russo" is a combining form, similar to the example of "Franco-British" at MOS:ENDASH. Jenks24 (talk) 17:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If it is (seems plausible, but I'm not sure), for consistency's sake, a lot will have to be changed. I edited some titles which I then will revert, but there are a lot of instances of "Russo–Turkish" within the individual articles that were already there. If you give me a go (please be certain about it), I'm willing to correct as much as I can. – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 17:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll ask at WT:MOS just to be sure. At any admins reading this: please don't move this on to a full discussion. Jenks24 (talk) 18:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I felt that this query better be discussed properly. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Original research by user:Karak1lc1k
Usre:Karak1lc1k has added "Decisive Ottoman victory" using this questionable source. This "source" does not state that the Russo-Turkish war 1676-81 was a Decisive Ottoman victory. "The war of 1676–81. In 1677 a Turkish–Crimean Tatar army invaded and ravaged Right-Bank Ukraine and took the capital, Chyhyryn. The Turks' attempt to retain Chyhyryn was repelled by a Russian-Ukrainian force led by Prince G. Romodanovsky and Hetman Ivan Samoilovych (see Chyhyryn campaigns, 1677–8), and the Turks were forced to retreat. In 1681 the Ottoman Porte, the Crimean Khanate, and Muscovy signed the Treaty of Bakhchesarai, according to which Muscovy had sovereignty over the Hetman state and the Zaporizhia, both sides agreed not to colonize the Southern Ukrainian lands between the Boh River and the Dnister River for 20 years, and Turkey retained control of the southern Kyiv region, the Bratslav region, and Podilia." Therefore, Karak11c1k's edit is original research. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

It was descive Ottoman victory. Ottoman army captured Chyryn and owned it 8 years long. The Russia Tsardom captured it again in second 1686 1700 Russo Türkish war Historiker123454 (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Lol you Russians want only take sources from Russians Editors. Hakan255 (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

You take only sources from Russians authors also when it lies Hakan255 (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Original research by IP
An IP has added "Ottoman victory" using Online Britannica as a source, yet according to A Military History of Russia: From Ivan the Terrible to the War in Chechnya, by David R. Stone, page 41, "The indecisive Russo-Turkish War from 1676 to 1681 centered on control of the fortress of Chigririn, just west of the Dnepr River." --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Result
Hallo. I would like correct the result because there is contradiction ! Ottoman Empire won this 1676 1681 war. Russia Tsardom took Cossacks Hetman after that Sultan Mehmed Avci sent Ibrahim pasha with Ottoman Army to Chyhyryn to capture, but its failed, then the Sultan sent Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa pasha and he took finally Chyhyryn with Ottoman army. Ottoman Empire owned Chyhyryn 31 years long. As result are written Ottoman Victory on Italian, Polish, French sites or books. We were happy when you correct it. Thank you Historiker123454 (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Notes

^ Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, (Routledge, 2007), 160. ^ a b Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, 161. ^ Paxton, John and John Traynor, Leaders of Russia and the Soviet Union, (Taylor & Francis Books Inc., 2004), 195.

References

Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007. Paxton, John and John Traynor, Leaders of Russia and the Soviet Union, Taylor & Francis Books Inc., 2004.

http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/

Historiker123454Historiker123454 (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

 * I see nothing that states "Ottoman victory". The website:
 * http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/
 * is a mirror site of Wikipedia. FYI, Wikipedia can not be used to reference Wikipedia.

 * David R. Stone, A Military History of Russia: From Ivan the Terrible to the War in Chechnya, (Greenwood Publishing, 2006), 41;"The indecisive Russo-Turkish War from 1676-1681 centered on the control of the fortress of Chigirin, just west of the Dnepr River." --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Conflict and Conquest in the Islamic World:A Historical Encyclopedia, ed. Alexander Mikaberidze, page 771;
 * "In 1654, after a powerful Cossack uprising against Poland, Russia signed the Treaty of Pereyaslavl with the Cossacks, which granted Russia control over parts of eastern Ukraine. The Russian expansion, however, provoked a war with Poland and the Crimean khanate, supported by the Ottoman Empire. In 1672, the Ottoman army occupied parts of southern Ukraine, and a preliminary contest between Russia and the Ottoman Turks began in 1676 after the Cossack under Ivan Samoilovich, Hetman of the Left-Bank Ukraine, asked for Russian assistance against the Turks, who supported his rival Hetman Petro Doroshenko. The Russian army, supported by Ukranian allies, captured the Cossack capital of Chyhyryn in 1676. The following year, a large Ottoman army, under Ibrahim Pasha, invaded Ukraine and besieged Chyhyryn, although a Russian attack soon forced the Ottoman army to retreat. In 1678, the Ottomans besieged Chyhyryn once again, capturing it in August. Over the next two years, the two sides limited their actions to raids and border attacks before the Treaty of Bakhchisarai, signed in 1681, established a buffer zone between the Ottoman and Russian-controlled regions of Ukraine."
 * Mikaberidze makes no mention of either side gaining victory. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

I wrote to you that Ottoman Empire captured Chigirin in 1678 until 1712 final victory for the 1676 1681 Russo Türkish War Historiker123454 (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

 * And your interpretation for the result of this war means nothing. Wikipedia is written using reliable secondary sources. You have provided no reliable sources stating the war was an Ottoman victory. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

When Ottoman captured Chyhyryn 31 years along after occupy then it is "Ottoman Victory" because the War ends in 1681 Hakan255 (talk) 14:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * And apparently, you can not read English. I will post it again for you, "And your interpretation for the result of this war means nothing. Wikipedia is written using reliable secondary sources." --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Taken from above:
 * Lol you Russians want only take sources from Russians Editors. Hakan255 (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

 * You take only sources from Russians authors also when it lies Hakan255 (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

 * First off, I am not Russian, but thanks for your battleground comment.
 * Second, David R. Stone, received his Ph.D in Russian history from Yale University in 1997. And does not appear to be Russian, either. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

The link where is written Ottoman victory as result in 1676 1681 Russo Turkish War
I sent you the website again where is written it is Otomman victory

http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/

Also in Polish, Italian, Türkish Wikipedia it is written Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiker123454 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Historiker123454 Historiker123454 (talk) 03:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hallo
Hi Kansas Bear

There are written in other Wikipedia Languages like on Italian, Polish, Türkish, Romanian as Ottoman victory Here are the links

On Italian Wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerra_russo-turca_(1676-1681)

On Polish Wikipedia  https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wojna_rosyjsko-turecka_(1674%E2%80%931681)

On Turkish Wikipedia https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1

On Romanian Wikipedia https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C4%83zboiul_Ruso-Turc_(1676%E2%80%931681)

also on French English la pariese site is it written Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiker123454 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Historiker123454Historiker123454 (talk) 03:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hallo
I sent you the website again where is written it is Otomman victory

http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/

Also in Polish, Italian, Türkish Wikipedia it is written Ottoman victory

Historiker123454 Historiker123454 (talk) 04:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Kansas Bear

There are written in other Wikipedia Languages like on Italian, Polish, Türkish, Romanian as Ottoman victory Here are the links

On Italian Wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerra_russo-turca_(1676-1681)

On Polish Wikipedia https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wojna_rosyjsko-turecka_(1674%E2%80%931681)

On Turkish Wikipedia https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1

On Romanian Wikipedia https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C4%83zboiul_Ruso-Turc_(1676%E2%80%931681)

also on French English la pariese site is it written Ottoman victory

Historiker123454 Historiker123454 (talk) 04:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Try reading this. And this, http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/ is a mirror site of Wikipedia. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Warfare, State, and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500-1700, page 170;"Furthermore, already from late 1677 Moscow's primary objective in the war had become the protection of Kiev and the Left Bank, and by this test the first Muscovite-Ottoman War could be said to have ended on terms advantageous to Moscow, terms won through the action of the Muscovite and Left Bank Ukrainian armies following the destruction of Chyhyryn. Victory was achieved in two ways."
 * Sounds like Russia won this war. The continued reliance on page 172 is about the battle of Chyhyryn, not the war itself. "For Mehmet IV and Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa the destruction of Chyhyryn was thereby rendered a Pyrrhic victory." -- page 172. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

why indecisive?
Ottomans captured the Chyhyryn after the war. So why indecisive? It was an Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnl0g 044 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Wow. Another "new user" stating the same tired argument. Try reading what I have posted. Since clearly you are not interested in what sources state! --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

War result
The result of 1676-1681 Russo-Turkish War is Ottoman Victory and KansasBear delete the several sources and move to indecisive with 1 source and he means "Wikipedia is written using reliable secondary sources"

He wrote In Campaign of 1678 in the beginning only the attack of Russians, but he leave out the the counterattack and the victory of the Turks.

Or after capturing Chyhyryn, Turks attacks the Russians army beyond the Dnieper and after offensive Russian army reatret to Kiev and Turks seized then Kaniv and he wrote in Propaganda:

"The Russian army retreated beyond the Dnieper, beating off the pursuing Turkish army, which would finally leave them in peace. Later the Turks seized Kanev established the power of Yuri Khmelnitsky on the Right-bank Ukraine, but did not dare to go to Kiev, where the Russian troops were stationed."

Summary of this war: The 1676-1681 Ottoman-Russian War, or Muscovite Campaign, was the first great war between the Ottoman Empire and the Russian Tsardom. During this war, Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha became the grand vizier. As a result of the 5-year war, the Russian Tsardom, which could not be strengthened was defeated, and with the Treaty of Bakhchisarai on January 31, 1681, Chyhyryn Fortress and the rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans.

according to the treaty Chyhyryn Fortress and rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans. Aftermath capturing Chyhyryn fortress, in the continuation battle in the near from Chyhyryn Russian Army had leave the battle and retreat from this battle to Kiev. Ottoman army march 140 km into Russian territory and captured Kaniv and hold for decades years after (Russo Turkish War 1676-1681) war.

Notes

Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700 " page number 172 is written Victory for Ottoman and Moscow loss Chyhyryn.

In Rhoads Murphey "Ottoman Warfare 1500-1700" book is written; "In the decades preceding the Ottomans’ attempted siege of Vienna in 1683 Ottoman armies had successfully prosecuted single-front wars in Hungary (the sieges of Varad [Oradea] in 1660 and Uyvar [N. Zamky] in 1663), Crete (the siege of Candia [Heraklion] between 1667 and 1669], Poland (the siege of Kamanice [Kamanetz-Podolsk] in 1672 and Russia (the siege of Çehrin [Chyhyryn] in 1678)" page number 9.

Brian Davies, Empire and Military revolution in eastern Europe: Russia's Turkish Wars in the eighteenth century page number 9.

Sources

 * Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007.

 * Rhoads Murphy "Ottoman Warfare 1500-1700"

 * Brian Davies, Empire and Military revolution in eastern Europe: Russia's Turkish Wars in the eighteenth century

 * Paxton, John e John Traynor, Leaders of Russia and the Soviet Union, Taylor & Francis Books Inc., 2004.

 * Abdulkadir Özcan, Diyanet İslam Ansiklopedisi, c.8, Page 249, 251

 * Hasan Karaköşe, Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Paşa Uluslararası Sempozyumu Page 159, 160

 * Dimitrie Cantemir, History of the Growth and Decay of the Ottoman Empire III, 2-4, 9 vd., 17-30.

 * Danişmend Kronoloji volume 3 page numbers 1237, 1238, 1239

 * Blochet, Catalogue, Suppl. 1909, Paris), nr. 870, 927, 1124. Karakeçi24 (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

 * I looked at what the first of these sources wrote (Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007, page 170):

"Furthermore, already from late 1677 Moscow’s primary objective in the war had become the protection of Kiev and the Left Bank, and by this test the first Muscovite—Ottoman War could be said to have ended on terms advantageous to Moscow, terms won through the action of the Muscovite and Left Bank Ukrainian armies following the destruction o f Chyhyryn. Victory was achieved in two ways."

 * So this source clearly state not Ottoman, but Moscow's victory in the whole war of 1676-1681.
 * On the other hand, the source that is now cited for the victory of the Ottomans (Rhoads Murphy "Ottoman Warfare 1500-1700", p. 9) writes only about one of the events - the siege of Chigirin in 1678 and thus cannot be used to assess the entire war.--Nicoljaus (talk) 13:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nicoljaus Invalid, you have no sources and evidence. Karakeçi24 (talk) 00:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 * "Russia was drawn into war with the Ottoman empire (1676–81) that ended in stalemate in the armistice of Bakhchisarai in 1681." --Kollmann, Nancy Shields (2017). The Russia Empire, 1450-1801. Oxford University Press, page 14.
 * "The indecisive Russo-Turkish War from 1676 to 1681 centered on control of the fortress of Chigirin..."-- Stone, David R. (2006). A Military History of Russia: From Ivan the Terrible to the War in Chechnya. Greenwood Publishing, page 41.
 * I strongly suggest you refrain from edit warring. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Nope,, I have sources and I can cite them (see above). On your part, I see the misuse of the sources - they do not say what you claim.--Nicoljaus (talk) 09:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nicoljaus "The indecisive Russo-Turkish War from 1676 to 1681 centered on control of the fortress of Chigirin..."-- Stone, David R. (2006) "Indecisive" is not compatible with Treaty of Bakhchisarai Karakeçi24 (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

"Russia was drawn into war with the Ottoman empire (1676–81) that ended in stalemate in the armistice of Bakhchisarai in 1681." --Kollmann, Nancy Shields (2017). To according to the treaty of Bakhchisarai Chyhyryn And fortress and rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans is not only armistice. Karakeçi24 (talk) 12:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Wrong.

 * "By the Treaty of Radzin of 1681, the Turks gave up their claims on the Ukraine..." --What Went Wrong?: Western Impact and Middle Eastern Reponse, Bernard Lewis, page 16.
 * Karakeçi24 should avoid giving their opinion as if it were fact. --Kansas Bear (talk) 13:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

 * And,

 * "The war is settled in the Treaty of Radzin on January 8, 1681. Turkey renounces any claim to Ukraine on the condition that the territory between the Bug and Dniester rivers be completely evacuated and remain thus." --A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East, Vol 2, Spencer Tucker, page 658.
 * And,

 * "In the 1681 Treaty of Bakhchisarai ending this conflict, the Turks formally acknowledged Muscovy's conquest of the left - bank Ukraine ." --Early Modern Russian Bureaucracy The Evolution of the Chancellery System from Ivan III to Peter the Great, 1478-1717, Volume 2, Peter Bowman Brown, page 486. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * And,

 * "Signed in January 1681 at Bakhchisarai(Crimea), the treaty proclaimed a 20-year truce and set the Dnieper River as the borderline between the Ottoman and Russian realms. The sultan then recognized Moscow’s sovereignty in eastern (left bank) Ukraine, including Kiev..." --Conflict and conquest in the Islamic world : A Historical Encyclopedia, Alexander Mikaberidze, page 180-181. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * And,

 * "The Turkish army had been defeated three times during the dismal years 1677-1678. After another two desultory and uneventful years Kara Mustafa was obliged to accept the unfavorable treaty of Radzin ( in 1681 ), giving up most of Turkish Ukraine to the Russians." -- Venice, Austria, and the Turks in the seventeenth century, Kenneth Meyer Setton, page 257. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you know many cases where winner is forced to pay tribute to the loser? Rus was forced to resume paying tribute and repay for the previously-skipped years. It's clear that Rus lost this specific war. 2A0D:6FC2:1264:2000:E905:38F2:A08E:97A7 (talk) 00:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

@KansasBear you wrote this in Propaganda Turks would not defeated threetimes 1677-1678. Turks would defeated only in 1677 Campaign

First, you leave out the victory of Turks at Tias'min River after third attack Russian lost that why Romodanovsky ordered to leave the citadel and withdraw troops to the left bank. Second, Russian lost beyond the Dnieper and reatret from this battle to Kiev and Turks seized Kaniv (141 near from Kiev)

And you wrote in Propaganda

"The Russian army retreated beyond the Dnieper, beating off the pursuing Turkish army, which would finally leave them in peace. Later the Turks seized Kanev established the power of Yuri Khmelnitsky on the Right-bank Ukraine, but did not dare to go to Kiev, where the Russian troops were stationed."

Why withdraw Russian army the battle and retreat to Kiev if they defated the Turks. After this Turks captured Kaniv.

Karakeçi24 (talk) 04:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 * If you have a problem then I suggest you contact an Admin. They will take great delight in reading your comments. Done here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Whose victory.
Well, acting with WP:GOODFAITH, I'll try to explain the situation. This was not a war in which the Ottoman Empire took Ukraine away from the Russians. In fact, as a result of the Truce of Andrusovo of 1667, Ukraine was divided into the Right Bank (Polish) and the Left Bank (Moscow) parts. But on the right bank was Kiev (now the capital of Ukraine), which Moscow tried to preserve as an important bridgehead (in a political and religious sense), although by agreement the Russians were supposed to cleanse it after two years. Thus, Moscow did not have any rights to the Right-Bank Ukraine, and if it had defeated the Turks, it would have had to violate the terms of the Truce of Andrusovo and fight with Poland. Therefore, for Moscow, the outcome of the war was acceptable - it secured the Left-Bank Ukraine and, moreover, de facto captured Kiev - Poland was too exhausted in the war with the Ottomans to object and soon recognized its transfer to Moscow. The Ottomans could also be happy - they retained their seizures in the Right-Bank Ukraine. In general, both sides received something at the expense of a third party - Poland (but in the subsequent years Poland returned much of the Right-Bank Ukraine). In reality, only the Ukrainian Cossacks lost, who hoped to preserve the unity of the country on both sides of the Dnieper.--Nicoljaus (talk) 09:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Result of war
I believe there is enough information concerning the result of this war to place "Disputed" for the result in the infobox. Perhaps something like what was done at Battle of Jamrud, whereby we indicate, in a section within the article, what sources state Russian victory, Ottoman victory, and Indecisive(stalemate). , --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Something like: "The result of the war, which was ended by the Treaty of Bakhchisarai, is disputed. Some historians say it was an Ottoman victory,(Murphey 1999, Perrie Davies 2006 ) yet other historians contend it was a Russian victory(Davies 2007). While some historians state it was a stalemate(Kollmann 2017, Stone 2006, Perrie Davies 2006)"

Additional sources can be added for each outcome. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I think this is a good solution. Only this is not a" battle", but a "war".--Nicoljaus (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I was trying to get the wording right and was thinking about the Battle of Jamrud. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The Perrie source is actually written by Davies, Perrie is just the editor. Already added to infobox. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Yes, the correct idea, leave the indication "disputed" in the infobox with a link to the section where to describe in more detail. Каракорум (talk) 06:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 * I have moved the information out of the infobox and into the article. If either of you finds more references, feel free to add them. --Kansas Bear (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Naming the unnamed sultan
I named the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed IV, in the article. Just wanted to be clear, his name is not stated in the source accompanying the text (atleast I tried and couldn't find it), but on the basis of Mehmed ruling in a wide span of year between this war; I think its safe to say that he was "that sultan". Feel free to remove if this isn't concrete evidence. But I think its a safe assumption. Thank you Danial Bass (talk) 11:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Kalmyk Khanate.svg

title: Talk:Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681)


text:
Talk:Diocese (disambiguation)

Untitled
I think this should just redirect to Diocese. gren 05:57, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) I concur, I suggest a vote for deletion 68.236.56.59 06:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This article needs to be moved to wiktionary, and this article should redirect to Diocese... Don't have the facilities to do it tonight, but I will add it to my to do list. Autopilots 04:57, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Diocese (disambiguation)


text:
User talk:Squeeself

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation 05:57, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

WP:LDS
Welcome to the WP:LDS project. Be sure to add the page to your watchlist. Tom Haws 14:41, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject LDS
Hello! I noticed you were on the list of members in the LDS WikiProject, and I was wondering if you were still interested in helping out there. You see, over the past few months, it appears that it has slowly drifted into inactivity. But you CAN help. Please consider doing both of the following:

 * 1) Take ONE thing form the To-Do list and do it. Once you're done with it, remove it from the list, and from the< >< >, so we know its done. Keep the page on your watchlist. We have a backlog going for more than half a year. Please help to work on it, and remove it.
 * 2) Vote on the LDSCOTF, and work on it!
 * 3) Tell your friends (esp. LDS friends, & esp. Wikipedian friends) about this WikiProject, and enocourage them to join (and be active).

Remember: your involvement in this WikiProject is just that - involvement! Please help us out.

(Note: I'm sending this out to everyone who's name was on the membership list, so I will NOT be watching this page for a response. If you want to contact me, do it on MY talk page, please.)

Thanks for all that you do -Trevdna 15:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Squeeself


text:
Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater

United States Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater (CGAS Clearwater) is the United States Coast Guard's largest air station. It is located at the St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport in Clearwater, Florida and is home to nearly 700 USCG aviation and support personnel. As of March 2021, there are ten MH-60T Jayhawk helicopters and four HC-130H Hercules aircraft assigned to CGAS Clearwater. Also on static display is USCG 1023, a restored Grumman HU-16 Albatross.

Air Station Clearwater also operates two aviation facilities in The Bahamas, one at Great Inagua and the other at the United States Navy's Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (AUTEC) installation at Andros Island. These facilities support continually deployed MH-60Ts from various Coast Guard air stations for Operations Bahamas, Turks and Caicos (OPBAT), a joint U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Coast Guard counter-narcotics (CN) and migrant smuggling interdiction operation.

History
In 1934, a Coast Guard air station was commissioned on the west coast of Florida at Albert Whitted Airport in downtown St. Petersburg. Designated as Coast Guard Air Station St. Petersburg, it subsequently became a home base for various Coast Guard amphibious aircraft and helicopters. In 1976, the addition of four land-based HC-130 Hercules aircraft, replacing the air station's HU-16E Albatross amphibious aircraft and augmenting the air station's HH-3F Pelican helicopters, combined with the limited airfield facilities and safety margins at Albert Whitted Airport for large fixed-wing aircraft, prompted the construction of and relocation to new facilities at St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport. With this move, AIRSTA St. Petersburg was downgraded to a non-flying installation renamed Coast Guard Station St. Petersburg (STA St. Petersburg) and the relocated air station's name was changed to U.S. Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater.

CGAS Clearwater has a rich history and its operations have been at the heart of significant events in Florida and the Caribbean for many years. In the early 1980s, its high operations tempo earned AIRSTA Clearwater two Coast Guard Meritorious Unit Commendations, the Humanitarian Service Medal, and the Coast Guard Unit Commendation. It was also during this time that the air station provided crucial support to the USCG surface fleet during the Cuban refugee boat lift. Shortly thereafter, AIRSTA Clearwater answered the call to duty with other U.S. military forces during Operation Urgent Fury, the Grenada rescue mission, and was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for its support of the invasion as well as the Coast Guard Meritorious Unit Commendation for its continual support efforts. Later that same year another Coast Guard Meritorious Unit Commendation was awarded to AIRSTA Clearwater for its role in Operation Wagon Wheel, an international drug interdiction effort.

In 1986, following on the success of the previous operation, AIRSTA Clearwater conducted Operation Hunter. This drug interdiction effort planted the seeds for what is today's OPBAT (Operation Bahamas and Turks and Caicos). Perhaps the single most noteworthy mission for the air station also came in 1986, during the launch of the Space Shuttle Challenger. AIRSTA Clearwater crews responded immediately, the initial crew arriving on scene so quickly that it had to stand off while the debris from the explosion continued to fall from the sky. In all, AIRSTA Clearwater flew 33 sorties on the Challenger mission and was awarded a Coast Guard Unit Commendation with Operational device.

CGAS Clearwater became the Coast Guard's largest air station in 1987 with the expansion of the drug interdiction mission, Operation Bahamas, Turks, and Caicos (OPBAT). This large ongoing mission resulted in the eventual assignment of twelve HH-60J Jayhawk helicopters, then the newest in the Coast Guard fleet, and boosted personnel strength to over 500 men and women. Also during this period, three additional HC-130s were stationed at AIRSTA Clearwater to support the increased law enforcement efforts. The air station's motto of "Anytime, Anywhere" accurately describes its pace of operations.

The 1990s were no less dramatic for the men and women of CGAS Clearwater. In 1991, the station's HC-130s responded rapidly to fly personnel and supplies in and out of the Southwest Asia combat theater in support of Operation Desert Storm. During the Haitian uprising in 1992, CGAS Clearwater crews evacuated American embassy personnel and transported U.S. Special Forces into Haiti. When south Florida and Louisiana were devastated by Hurricane Andrew the same year, CGAS Clearwater crews flew missions round the clock, transporting hundreds of tons of badly needed supplies. In March 1993, the "Storm of the Century" struck Florida leaving numerous sunken vessels in its wake. Air Station Clearwater crews launched at the height of the storm and pulled 62 people from the water in what was the busiest search and rescue day in the air station's history. In the summer of 1994, air crews participated in a massive SAR effort which located and rescued 34,568 Cubans and 23,389 Haitian migrants from the waters of the Caribbean.

In 1997, the U.S. renewed its effort towards the War on Drugs, and AIRSTA Clearwater responded as part of Operations Frontier Shield, Gulf Shield, and Frontier Lance. These operations were aimed at stemming the flow of illegal drugs and migrants and spanned from the Leeward Islands of the Caribbean to the southern coastline of Texas. The Coast Guard set new records for both drug seizures and arrests. Other accolades for AIRSTA Clearwater included:

 * Winner of the National Defense Transportation Award for 2000.
 * Winner of Excellence in Food Services Award for 2001, 2002, 2004 and 2007.

In 2005, Air Station Clearwater crews deployed overseas to aid and support the survivors of the 2004 tsunami in the Indian Ocean.

In 2006, the United States Navy Reserve vacated the former Navy Operational Support Center St. Petersburg/Clearwater (formerly Naval Reserve Center St. Petersburg/Clearwater) adjacent to the air station, consolidating with Navy Operational Support Center Tampa at a recently completed purpose-built facility at MacDill Air Force Base. The Navy transferred its former Clearwater facility to the Coast Guard which then placed it under the oversight of Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater. The complex now supports Port Security Unit 307, a Coast Guard Reserve unit, as well as providing additional facilities for AIRSTA Clearwater requirements.

In 2012 and 2013, AIRSTA Clearwater figured prominently in The Weather Channel television documentary series, Coast G. AIRSTA Clearwater then commenced transition of their HH-60J fleet to the MH-60T Jayhawk in 2014 a

Current aircraft
The HC-130 Hercules first became a part of Air Station Clearwater in 1976. The Lockheed HC-130H model is the current version assigned, with 5 such aircraft in the air station's current inventory. HC-130s from Air Station Clearwater have deployed worldwide, to including most of the contiguous 48 states, Alaska, Hawaii, throughout the Caribbean, Central America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia. The HC-130H Hercules performs numerous missions in support of Search and Rescue, Law Enforcement, Marine Environmental Protection, and logistics. The aircraft is an ideal platform for long range Search and Rescue, with over 14 hours of airborne endurance and large scanner windows for observers built into the airframe sides.

The nine Sikorsky HH-60J Jayhawk helicopters previously assigned to AIRSTA Clearwater that had replaced the previous HH-3F Pelican aircraft in the late 1980s were replaced in 2014 by thirteen upgraded MH-60T Jayhawk versions. Three of these MH-60T aircraft were later transferred to Coast Guard Air Station Borinquen, Puerto Rico when that air station transitioned from the MH-65E Dolphin to the MH-60T, resulting in AIRSTA Clearwater's current complement of ten MH-60Ts. This aircraft has a long-range capability of 600 nautical miles (1100 km) to support Coast Guard cutters on Law Enforcement patrols, deliver dewatering pumps to sinking vessels, evacuate injured crew members from vessels far at sea, and many other missions. Air Station Clearwater helicopter aircrews fly an average of over 400 Search and Rescue cases each year along both the east and west coasts of Florida, the Bahamas, and beyond.

Installation Facilities
AIRSTA Clearwater is a tenant military activity / long-term leased facility comprising several acres in the northwest quadrant of St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport. A separate Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF) of the U.S. Army Reserve is located approximately a 1/2 mile north of the air station. The military cantonment area for the Coast Guard consists of two large aircraft maintenance hangars, associated aircraft parking areas, a headquarters complex, and approximately a dozen other support buildings to include quarters for flight crews on 24-hour alert, a dining facility/galley, a medical clinic, swimming pool, and an All Hands club for station personnel. A Coast Guard Exchange complex consisting of a retail store, uniform shop, barber shop, and beauty salon for use by all active and retired U.S. military personnel and eligible family members is also located on the installation.

title: Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater


text:
Talk:Steven Adler

Sexual abuse
In this interview, Adler mentions being sexually abused as a child. If you have his autobiography, could you let me know what he writes on the topic? It would be a great addition to the article, as it probably goes a long way in explaining some of his life choices. Prayer for the wild at heart (talk) 15:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Picture
Steven's page is the only one of the Original Members of G N'R that doesn't have a picture. Would really make his page LOOK BETTER. 112.136.34.68 (talk) 14:42, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

 * Appreciate you guys adding a picture to Adler's page, however, there are many more photos of him available online, and many more photos that are better photos of him. I think he and the fans would appreciate very much a few of those being added.  Perhpas him at the drums with Guns n Roses in the 80's, one with his current wife, and maybe one of him alone in the 80's.  A more current photo that is a little more flattering.  But, I know you have your hands full!  So when you get the chance.  Thanks so much!  Thanks for all you guys do. 2600:1700:FE31:3900:90FB:2D53:183E:A1EA (talk) 07:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Steven Adler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://crazewire.com/features/20041018460.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Steven Adler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110925053514/http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/interviews/interviews/steven_adler_im_finally_starting_to_get_the_recognition_that_i_deserve.html to http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/interviews/interviews/steven_adler_im_finally_starting_to_get_the_recognition_that_i_deserve.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927225414/http://www.metalsludge.tv/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1138&Itemid=37 to http://www.metalsludge.tv/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1138&Itemid=37
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606042210/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=10152 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=10152
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606042658/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=15400 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=15400
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606043828/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=44594 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=44594
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606044208/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=77756 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=77756
 * Added tag to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=148795
 * Added tag to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=151526
 * Added tag to http://legacy.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=171277

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Adler's Name
The article clearly explains why his surname is Adler rather than Colletti. But we still don't know exactly why he is Steven Adler rather than Michael Adler. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

 * Hey, Timothy. I believe the reason for this was because he was not allowed to have or share the name of a living relative, per his mother's side of the family's Jewish beliefs.  His father was his living relative.  He was named after him originally. 2600:1700:FE31:3900:90FB:2D53:183E:A1EA (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Timothy! I see now that it has been corrected already in the Wiki article.  Thank you for bringing that to their attention. 2600:1700:FE31:3900:90FB:2D53:183E:A1EA (talk) 06:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Live Like A Suicide and Singles (Discography) - Thanks
In the list of Adler's discography, you did not list 'Live Like a Suicide'. Yes, it was an EP, but that doesn't matter. Please include it. Thank you. You do have a page for 'Live Like A Suicide' itself. Also, you do not list singles as well as some other SP albums.

These are not all, but some. Thanks.

Single release [ edit] "Mr. Brownstone" was the first Guns N' Roses single released outside of the United States and appeared as the A-side of "It's So Easy" in the United Kingdom.

All songs credited to Guns N' Roses except where noted UK 1987 7" vinyl (GEF 30) No. Title Writer(s) Length 1. "Welcome to the Jungle" 4:30 2. "Whole Lotta Rosie" (Live AC/DC cover) Angus Young, Malcolm Young, Bon Scott 5:29 Total length: 9:59 UK 1987 12" vinyl (GEF 30T) No. Title Writer(s) Length 1. "Welcome to the Jungle" 4:30 2. "Whole Lotta Rosie" (Live AC/DC cover) Young, Young, Scott 3. "It's So Easy" (live) Guns N' Roses, West Arkeen 4. "Knockin' on Heaven's Door" (Live Bob Dylan cover) Bob Dylan US 1988 7" vinyl (927 759-7) No. Title Writer(s) Length 1. "Welcome to the Jungle" 4:30 2. "Mr. Brownstone" Izzy Stradlin 3:46 Total length: 8:17 UK 1988 7" vinyl (GEF 47) No. Title Length 1. "Welcome to the Jungle" 4:30 2. "Nightrain" 4:29 Total length: 9:00 UK 1988 12" vinyl (GEF 47T) UK 1988 3" CD (GEF 47CD) No. Title Length 1. "Welcome to the Jungle" 4:30 2. "Nightrain" 4:29 3. "You're Crazy" (Acoustic Version) 4:23 Total length: 13:10

- A Turner 2600:1700:FE31:3900:90FB:2D53:183E:A1EA (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Steven Adler


text:
Most Wanted

Most Wanted may refer to:

Law enforcement
A most wanted list used by a law enforcement agency to alert the public, such as:
 * FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives
 * FBI Most Wanted Terrorists
 * ICE Most Wanted
 * List of Mexico's 37 most-wanted drug lords
 * List of most wanted fugitives in Italy
 * Saudi list of most wanted suspected terrorists
 * NIA Most Wanted, India's National Investigation Agency
 * U.S. list of most-wanted Iraqis
 * List of most-wanted Nazi war criminals, Simon Wiesenthal Center
 * Most Wanted, successor to UK NCA Operation Captura in Spain

Film

 * Most Wanted (1997 film), US
 * Most Wanted (2011 film), Indian Odia-language film
 * Most Wanted (2020 film), Canada
 * India's Most Wanted (film), 2019 Indian film

Music

 * Most Wanted (Hilary Duff album)
 * Most Wanted (Kane & Abel album)
 * Most Wanted (MOK album)
 * Most Wanted: The Greatest Hits, an album by the Wanted
 * Most Wanted, a mixtape by SpotemGottem
 * The Most Wanted Person in the United States, by 100 gecs

Television

 * FBI: Most Wanted, 2020
 * "Most Wanted" (FBI), pilot
 * MTV's Most Wanted, 1992
 * Most Wanted (1976 TV series), 1976–77
 * "Most Wanted" (Beavis and Butt-head), an episode
 * Marvel's Most Wanted, a TV pilot
 * India's Most Wanted, 1999 Indian crime television series

Video games

 * Need for Speed: Most Wanted (2005 video game), a racing game
 * Need for Speed: Most Wanted (2012 video game), a racing game

title: Most Wanted


text:
User talk:Coolmallu

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

-- Sundar 06:00, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. You might be interested in the following:

Keralam
Hi,

Welcome to wikipedia. On Keralam page I saw you have changed position of characters of കേരളം.

if you do not see കേരളം appear as േകരളം on your PC, it is because you have not enabled East Asian Unicode font viewing in your computer. Note MS-windows comes with this setting OFF by default :(

Kannada Wikipedia and Malayalam Wikipedia to know more. Also make sure you have the right font.

 * - Cheers, Bijee 6 July 2005 22:53 (UTC)

 * Sorry for delay in reply, I have fixed it at Keralam page. And dont worry is OK to make accidental mistake. -23:59, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Coolmallu


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steomac

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:15, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Steomac
Appears to be a vanity page. Epolk 06:00, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 07:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree. --Mysidia 07:46, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 11:05, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. You're So Vain. -- BD2412 talk 15:23, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
 * Delete; vanity, non-notable entry created by a fan of a messageboard. jglc | t | c 18:01, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steomac


text:
Talk:Ottoman titles

What is the source? It looks just wrong.
 * It is: the 'three noble titles' are not excusively, nor even mainly, aristocratic, nor the only ones, nor by the way limited to the Ottoman empire See a better source I've added, notably also its pages for (the khevival dynasty's) Egypt [] and its bottom links Titles & Glossary Fastifex 09:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Pashas, Bey, effendi &co
Just looking of the pages to Pasha, Bey and effendi we see a larger list of titles. These should be at the very least mention in this article. For exemple: khedive, viziers, Mushir, Lewa, Miralai and Kaimakam. Dryzen 17:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

 * I've added the essentials for the dynasty itself, but such a vague page title and no initial definition just won't do. Please specify which titles are to be included (noble, military, court, judicial, administrative offices etc.?) so a proper structure can be created, or limit this article's scope and rename it accordingly (including see also mentions for other spheres of Ottoman life), which might be a better idea as much would probably be just doubling other, more specialized articles, so you better examine those closely, which is a good way to get inspiration anyhow. Doing all this properly is a big job, otherwise it's a naively bad idea! Fastifex 09:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I happened to have landed on yhis page while reading about the Pashas. With only three titles presented I though it was a grosly under nourished article. I though it an interessting idea to enumerate the Ottoman titles and hierachy all in one place. It definitly does need work. From the history page it looks like a rather old page. Its amazing that so little was done with it. I beleive that this page should present as many titles in hierachy divided by sphere of influence: like Fastifex indicated (noble, military, court, judicial, administrative offices etc). Each title with a one to two line explenation for those with a self title page like Pasha while a slightly longer text for orphan titles like Lewa. I am though no expert on the subject and as I said was looking for these titles. Therefore my suggestions are from the point of view of a reader/researcher. Dryzen 19:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Good work by the way FastifexDryzen 19:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Relative Rank
I understand that that the titles moved around a bit and a Wali in one place might have outranked a Khedive in another, but I am going to attempt a relative ranking. Please fix as you see necessary.

--iFaqeer (talk) 07:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ottoman titles


text: User talk:68.60.240.20

title: User talk:68.60.240.20


text:
Rally Monkey

The Rally Monkey is the unofficial mascot for the Los Angeles Angels Major League Baseball team.

Introduction
The character debuted on June 6, 2000, when the Angels were trailing the San Francisco Giants 5–4 in the bottom of the ninth inning. Two video board operators, Dean Fraulino and Jaysen Humes, took a clip of a monkey jumping around from the 1994 Jim Carrey movie comedy Ace Ventura: Pet Detective, and superimposed the words "RALLY MONKEY!" on top of it. The Angels scored two runs and won the game.

Growing popularity
The video clip proved to be so popular that the team hired Katie, a white-haired capuchin monkey who previously appeared as Marcel in the television sitcom Friends, to star in original clips for later games. When seen, she bounces to the House of Pain song "Jump Around" and sometimes holds a sign proclaiming that it is "RALLY TIME!"

The rally monkey came to national and world-wide attention during the Angels' appearance in the 2002 World Series, again against the San Francisco Giants. In the sixth game, the Angels were playing at home, but were trailing the series 3-2 and facing elimination. They were down 5-0 as the game entered the bottom of the seventh inning. Amid fervid rally-monkey themed fan support, the Angels proceeded to score six unanswered runs over the next two innings, winning the game and turning the momentum of the series for good (they went on to clinch the championship in game 7).

In 2009, the Angels once again reached the post-season, sparking a renewal of the rally monkey's popularity.

Cultural references
Additional videos featuring the Rally Monkey show her edited into popular films and TV shows such as The Brady Bunch Movie, Jurassic Park, Field of Dreams, Star Trek, Risky Business, WarGames, and Animal House. The Angels started selling plush monkeys that fans bring to games.

ESPN did a SportsCenter commercial in which it showed one of the executives having to make "budget cuts," leading to the release of the monkey. The monkey pleaded by raising the "It's Rally Time" sign.

In one installment of the popular comic strip Get Fuzzy, the strip's protagonist, Bucky Katt, attempts to travel to Anaheim to eat the Rally Monkey after seeing it on television, as part of a running gag focused on Bucky's irrational desire to eat a monkey.

title: Rally Monkey


text: User talk:24.253.63.251

title: User talk:24.253.63.251


text:
User talk:Hillary Clinton's DNA

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- 06:06, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hillary Clinton's DNA


text: Category:Indoor arenas in the Czech Republic


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publish and be damned

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:15, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Publish and be damned
Advert. Online print-on-demand company with an Alexa ranking of 973,226. SWAdair | Talk 06:08, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity press advert. Average Earthman 06:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, perfectly obvious vanity advert. Why are we voting? --07:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)(signing my vote --Wetman 16:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete Obvious advertisement attempt. --Mysidia 07:48, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Jerry Crimson Mann 10:43, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or rewrite. — Instantnood 11:05, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Funny company name though. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:49, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advert. -- BD2412 talk 15:22, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity piece on vanity press. jglc | t | c 17:22, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Freedom of the press or Delete.
 * D to the ezzle, l to the ezzeet, this article is an advertizzeet! MC Rocker 00:23, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .


text:
Talk:The Complete U2

Upgrade
The original and upgrade prices are both discounted 66% (from 99 to 34 cents/song & 30 to 10 cents/song), but I can't source it.--99.129.166.4 (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * On iTunes? I can't find it, but to get a URL to use as a source go to the album's page, right click the title and select "Copy URL" (or something to that effect; it's the only option). Then paste it in the article in between the tags. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

THE UPGRADE TO 256 ISNT WORKING. APPLE ITUNES HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. EVEN IF IT DID WORK ITS NOT FOR ALL 446 SONG. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.194.45 (talk) 23:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

There was an digital booklet (PDF) containing album art, track listings, and band commentary —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.182.226 (talk) 21:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:The Complete U2