text:
Talk:Potassium chloride

Untitled
Added information about KCl as beta radiation source. Requires further editing of details

(10.72% decays by electron capture, EC, and the majority of these decays (10.55%?) are accompanied by 1.46 MeV gamma. There is also a tiny fraction of beta+ decay) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 08:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC) w. User:Helmut Wabnig

KCl is available from different suppliers. The selected ones are not a neutral selection. More points:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:213.188.227.119

Best regards

Template messed up?
Looks like someone's messed up the chembox template. The top half of the page is displaying wiki code and comments. Anyone have the time to fix it? -Khedron (not logged in; 200.71.231.95 15:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC))

Table of values—what are the values?
In the table in Physical properties, what are those values? Are they the conductivity values (what units?) in the carefully-prepared solutions (what concentration?) mentioned in the preceeding sentence? Are they solubility values (what units, what temperature)? Something else? DMacks 16:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like someone had vandalised the table - I got the header from an older version of the article. Walkerma 16:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Hadn't had a chance to look deeper into what went wrong. DMacks 16:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

hey buddies how to take lethal injection.how much is sufficient to stops heart?

--117.99.24.5 (talk) 03:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)sumit

 * The solubility data doesn't mention if it's w/w or w/v. Also, it doesn't agree with the data given at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solubility_table. Somaeye (talk) 07:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here. If you have concerns, please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 15:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

LD50

 * "Orally it is toxic in excess; the LD50 is around 2500 milligram/kg (meaning that a person weighing 75 kg (165 lb) would have to consume about 190 g (6.7 ounces) which is equivalent to 38 tea spoons; table salt is about as toxic)"

suffers from a basic problem in that it does not say what the result of this would be. First, many readers have no idea what LD50 means. Second, for those that do, it is left to the reader to assume the result is death - and assume wrongly. LD50 is the dosage at which 50% mortality occurs, significant mortality occurs well below this dose (and 100% mortality well above it). Therefore dosages with risk of death are in fact much lower than the quoted LD50 figure. Its worth bearing in mind that all sorts of people use wiki for all sorts of things.

I have clarified this by stating what the result of this action would be in the article. Hopefully this statement will then be correctly understood by many more readers. Jeff G then reverted it and requested " if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. " so I've put this explanation here for you all to decide. 86.4.152.167 (talk) 20:35, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Building on what was already said, I've clarified the LD50 somewhat. LD50 is determined on a population basis, and the prior wording ("for a 50% chance of death") made it seem like a given individual would have a 50% chance of mortality. Not true - if that individual is somewhere lower on the curve, they'd have a 100% chance of mortality, 100% of the time. Again, since people use wiki for all kinds of things, it's better to be specific.--- Lawt3 20:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawt3 (talk • contribs)

LD50 is linked (at least now) so it is easy for the ignorant reader to find out! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 08:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

melts and sublimes?!
in the chembox it has a melting point and a boiling point. next to the boiling point, it says "(sublimes)" how can a liquid sublime. maybe it only melts under abnormal pressures. clarification is definitely needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.39.190.212 (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

I was just heading here to ask the same thing. Sublimation is a phase change from solid to gas, and a liquid cannot sublime. Perhaps they meant that the salt begins to dissociate into potassium vapor and chlorine gas rather than boil at those temperatures. Would someone with a better knowledge of the thermal stability of this salt please correct this glaring error? 160.94.47.16 (talk) 18:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * My wild guess this is something to do with an archaic definition of sublimation. KCl is no different to other salts (e.g. NaCl) in terms of melting/boiling. Removed. Materialscientist (talk) 00:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

E508
Please add to appropriate section (+LD50, if E508 limits exist) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_food_additives,_Codex_Alimentarius "508 A E potassium chloride mineral salt" (85.156.218.108 (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC))

Refimprove tag deleted
Why? The first three sections of this article, after the lead section, contain lots of technical information with no citations whatsoever.

Coconutporkpie (talk) 01:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 03:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Infobox solubility has changed for the worse, now has ambiguous units.
On the 24th of April 2016 (last year) the infobox was changed from showing solubility in water as grams/Litre, to mass %. I'm not convinced this is a positive change for a number of reasons.

I think that a bare "%" is an amazingly ambiguous unit. is it percent by mass, volume, or m/v? Is that a percentage of the solvent's mass, or the solution after the salt is added? Based on the original editor's comment, and comparing those variations to the original g/L values, I'm pretty confident it's the mass of salt / mass of solution (water+salt). That's a fine thing to measure, but I don't think % is the unit that best communicates this combination. Mass fraction (chemistry) seems to indicate that m% or wt% are less ambiguous ways to communicate this measurement.

I've looked at 10 other simple salts, and I haven't found any other instance of mass %, it's usually g/100mL and g/kg. Interestingly, Lithium chloride has both g/100mL and g/kg, I guess it's because the sources had different units. Certainly we can have unusual units, but why change from a normal unit (g/L) to an unusual one?

Finally, I'm confused by the discrepancy between the old and new values. Converting the mass % to g/L, I'm seeing about 5% error at 100 °C, even after correcting for the varying density of pure water with temperature. I'm not a chemist so I don't know what else could influence the solubility of two pure substances. Did the experimenters really lose 27 grams?

For this table I converted the weight % to g/L, accounting for the density of water. I derived the expression $$\frac{w*p}{(1-p)}=s$$, where $$w$$ is the density of water (g/L), $$p$$ is the given percentage to convert, and $$s$$ is the resulting amount of salt, in g/L. This formula accounts for the unknown final density of the solution.

Hopefully someone with a bit more knowledge in this area can make a quick decision and either change units to wt% or m%, change sources, or decide it's good as-is. Thanks for your time, 2001:8003:6078:4B00:20F1:425A:335F:6830 (talk) 23:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

 * Hey, I've updated the solubility to look more like the other pages. It seems like somebody took your percentages and simply wrote the wrong units next to them. I hope this version has it right. Scythe33 (talk) 20:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Potassium chloride "harmless in food" claim
User:Doc James recently contested the claim that potassium chloride is harmless in food. Since it is uncited and I can see it being problematic to a layman ("harmless" is a much stronger claim than "not lethal"!), I could see a further verification/citation as a good thing. This is not at all an area of my expertise, so a priori I don't know anything about the claim save the existence of salt substitutes.

I can't look much further into this or edit the article at the moment—I might come back later to do so, but if anyone else wants to, I've found the following that seems relevant at a glance:

 * FDA opinion on KCl
 * Salt substitutes are often KCl-centric
 * Van Buren, L., Dötsch-Klerk, M., Seewi, G., & Newson, R. S. (2016). Dietary Impact of Adding Potassium Chloride to Foods as a Sodium Reduction Technique. Nutrients, 8(4), 235. http://doi.org/10.3390/nu8040235

Laogeodritt [ Talk 18:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have removed the sentence in question. Would need a ref to say it is harmless before we should. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 21:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Have adjusted it based on the FDA source you found above. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 21:10, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Opaque Wording
This article as of 2020.10.01 carries this: "While SOP typically sells at a premium to MOP, the vast majority of potash fertilizer worldwide is sold as MOP." The first part of this sentence is a complete mystery to me. Is it a British expression? South African? What does it mean? Can someone translate it into more common English? Is it intended to say "While SOP is cheaper than MOP..." etc. ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendly person (talk • contribs) 22:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Merger proposal
Should we move Sylvite into Potassium chloride? I think that the content in the sylvite article might be explained in the context of potassium chloride, and the sylvite article is of a reasonable size that the merging of sylvite will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. However, I am not sure. What do you think? Firestar464 (talk) 07:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * They seem fine as separate articles and cover the topics well. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The central difference between the two articles seems to be that sylvite is potassium chloride in mineral form. Is that enough to constitute separation? In any case, I am going to add sylvite as another name for potassium chloride, because it seems like the two terms could potentially be used almost interchangeably. Redcoat05 (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. If anything, we should be splitting more articles for chemical compounds and chemical elements that are also natural minerals. The infobox for one emphasizes quite different properties than the infobox for the other.--Kent G. Budge (talk) 01:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Oppose, per Kent G. Budge. Firejuggler86 (talk) 20:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Closing, given the consensus not to merge. Klbrain (talk) 20:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Addendum: Having article for allotropes is common; Halite for Sodium Chloride, Diamond for Carbon etc. Klbrain (talk) 20:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Potassium chloride


text:
Ali Baba of Makuria

Ali Baba (c. 854) was a ruler of the Nubian kingdom of Makuria. He was forced to sue for peace to end the war between Makuria and Egypt that had started in 854.1

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Ali Baba of Makuria


text:
Talk:Ann M. Martin

Main Street
I added in the Main Street "area". Anyone who has never read the books would be confused if the three(and soon, four)books were placed in "Other Books". It's a series, not some random books that she wrote... Annieeee (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)♥

when was she married and how many kids did they have and what was here husbands name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.235.134.2 (talk) 13:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ann M. Martin


text:
User talk:Lissoy

Akofa_bonsi.jpg
I have tagged Image:Akofa_bonsi.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:AHSAA logo.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:AHSAA logo.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 17:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Indian Pines Golf Course
Well done on finding those sources: I'm sometimes a bit doubtful when I see golf courses come up on new page patrol but these look good. Would be better if one of them were linked on the www I gues, but you can't have everything! Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk)  18:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Notable Auburnites
Who are you to decide who is a 'notable' auburnite, and who is not? To me that smacks of an opinion, rather than a hard fact. People with different interests and backgrounds would all have different ideas on who is notable, and who is not. To some people who don't care about football, why does it matter is someone was once the 3rd string punter for Auburn University? You might likewise think the same of someone else in a different field, and that's fine. But how can you edit off someone who was in the same classification/field as another person listed in this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.226.177 (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

 * You raise a good point. I have reworked the list to be a little more objective and only include those who are sufficiently notable to have a Wikipedia article.  That way we can use WP:BIO as a defacto notability guideline.  Thanks for your suggestions!  -- Lissoy (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2006 AHSAA Football Playoffs
I have nominated 2006 AHSAA Football Playoffs, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/2006 AHSAA Football Playoffs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 11:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Mark Spencer-cropped.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Mark Spencer-cropped.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 22:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:James Fukai.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:James Fukai.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Polly (Parrot) 22:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Akofa Bonsi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Akofa Bonsi.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Polly (Parrot) 22:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

O. B. Drake Middle School
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of O. B. Drake Middle School, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Drake Middle School. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Auburn-AL-city-flag.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Auburn-AL-city-flag.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

What you need is WikiSpot
Hi. Obviously you are a huge fan of the city of Auburn. I'm not sure of your real name, but you must have heard of me because you listed me in the first version of the Auburn High graduates page.

It's interesting enough to have all of this content for Auburn in Wikipedia. But it would be much more useful for Auburn to have what Davis has right now, a WikiSpot site. See the page for DavisWiki, and DavisWiki itself. DavisWiki is so influential that just about every city official and restaurant owner in town know about it. Greg Kuperberg (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mike Pugh
I have nominated Mike Pugh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mike Pugh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. fuzzy510 (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

James E. Martin Aquatics Center
Hello, I was wondering if it would be alright if I used the picture found on James E. Martin Aquatics Center on the article Auburn Tigers swimming and diving. Thanks! AUburnTiger (talk) 01:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Reassessment of Auburn_High_School
Auburn_High_School has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Ruslik_ Zero 10:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:The Bottle, Alabama.jpg
Hi, could you please add some source info to the photo? Thanks.

Thank you for uploading File:The Bottle, Alabama.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Infrogmation (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks much! Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 23:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Auburn-high-swimming.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Auburn-high-swimming.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Auburn-high-volleyball.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Auburn-high-volleyball.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Synthesis problem at Opelika High School
Please see the article talk page before re-adding this information. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 20:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for Campus Ambassadors in Houston
Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian connected with Rice University. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at another Houston school, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live in Houston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Census
Hey Lissoy! Why haven't you changed Auburn's census numbers to reflect the actual being lower than the 2009 estimate? Dontheman69Dontheman69 (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Youssef-Biaz.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Youssef-Biaz.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Auburn city schools.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Auburn city schools.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Jay Jacobs (athletic director)
There has been a slow edit war going on here with content that you mentioned reverting in March 2011, on the talk page. I have again reverted it today and warned the editor/s involved. See Talk:Jay Jacobs (athletic director) for details and links. - 220  of  Borg 01:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Auburn-high-volleyball.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Auburn-high-volleyball.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Auburn-high-swimming.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Auburn-high-swimming.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Auburn High golf team.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Auburn High golf team.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Auburn high aerial.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Auburn high aerial.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

 * I've sent in an OTRS ticket concerning the email giving permission for use of this image. - Lissoy (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Auburn high school sources
Hi, Lissoy. You surely see the above four messages regarding permission (apologies regarding that, but we need it for legal reasons... renunciation of one's copyrights isn't valid unless it's in writing... it's complicated), but I'm writing about a few other images you've uploaded. Specifically, they don't have a source:
 * File:Auburn-high-school-class-of-1897.jpg
 * File:Auburn-high-girls-baseball-team-1910s.jpg
 * File:Auburn-high-school-1870.jpg
 * File:Auburn-female-college-chapel.jpg

Can you try to remember where you got those photos? It's actually important because US copyrights are based on when something is published, not when it's created. If any of the above images was published within a certain timeframe, they actually aren't free (again, it's complicated ). I'm sure most editors will be too picky about it, but can you please tell us how you got the images originally, whether scanned from the school archives, scanned from a yearbook, family collection, etc.

Also there is this image, which you assert was published before 1964 but never give the publication source:
 * File:Auburn-high-class-of-1929.jpg

Sorry for the legalese; hope you're able to provide as much of this information as possible!

PS. If you don't end up responding here in the next few days, please leave me a note on my talk page that you've responded when you finally do. Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Again, I would appreciate if you could respond to my concerns on the above images. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

 * It took me a while to go back and dig out the information you were looking for, but here we go:
 * File:Auburn-high-school-class-of-1897.jpg - taken in 1897, first published in the Lee County Bulletin as part of article "Miss Lucile Burton Says High School Graduation Was All-Girl in 1897", May 29, 1947 with no notice of copyright. Based on this, it should fall under PD-PRE1964.
 * File:Auburn-high-girls-baseball-team-1910s.jpg - taken around 1914, distributed to the public in a scrapbook form in spring 1915; I located the photo through the George Alfonso Wright Papers, 1900-1990 - RG 837 in the Manuscript Collections of the Special Collections and Archives at Auburn University.
 * File:Auburn-high-school-1870.jpg - taken between 1899 and 1920 based on the buildings around it by unknown photographer, I located it in the Auburn University Archives; I do not know of the original date of publication, but I do have a copy of a published version in The Auburn Bulletin, "School days: Pot-bellied stoves, cucumber sandwiches, and one-eyed cat", August 30, 1978 with no notice of copyright and an attribution to the Auburn University Archives.
 * File:Auburn-female-college-chapel.jpg - taken between 1883 and 1888 by unknown photographer; I located the photo in the Auburn University Archives.
 * File:Auburn-high-class-of-1929.jpg - taken in 1929, distributed to the public as part of a collection of photos associated with the graduation of the Auburn High School class of 1929; I located the photo in the Carolyn Jenkins Collection, 1913-1933 - RG 93 in the Manuscript Collections of the Special Collections and Archives at Auburn University.

Great. Most of those seem good enough. Some of them are probably limited publication, but I'm frankly not going to pick on it unless a rights-holder gets upset about it (I don't know enough about the circumstances of the distribution to the public, and I doubt it will be an issue anyway). As for the second to last one, is there any other information you can provide, like which section you found it in, and if it's ever been published in any way?
 * Let me know if more information is needed about these works. - Lissoy (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Creek War of 1836
I saw you had started to improve the article Creek War of 1836 on your userpage:Creek War of 1836, but stopped work on it in late 2010. I would like to encourage you to finish it or atleast add what you already have to the present article. It is much better than what is currently there. 66.214.13.190 (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Bee Hive name?
I've been looking at the article for Bee Hive, Auburn, and I'm pretty sure the community should be spelled as Beehive. The USGS GNIS lists it as Beehive and the local road is Beehive Rd. I know the map you included on the page lists it as Bee Hive though. Should we go by the GNIS, since that's what is used for all the other place names on Wikipedia? Also, I was wondering if we could classify Beehive as an unincorporated community, since according to that map and others, it lies outside of the Auburn city limits? If we can classify as that, I'll add it to the Lee County page and template. Thanks!Dofftoubab (talk) 21:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=620444452 your edit] to Auburn High School Tigers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:06, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * with Central of Phenix City, Enterprise, Jeff Davis and Robert E. Lee of Montgomery, Prattville, and Smiths Station high schools. Alabama High School Athletic Association ''[http://www.ahsaa.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:AL-Notasulga-location-in-Lee-and-Macon.png
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add  to the Media by uploader or Presumed self tag(s) if  present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the information where appropriate).

IF you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created [ here].

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Auburn-high-class-1926.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Auburn-high-class-1926.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 01:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Horace-king-young.jpg

The file File:Horace-king-young.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prattville-lions-logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Prattville-lions-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lissoy


text:
New Hampshire Route 84

New Hampshire Route 84 is a 4.184 mi secondary east–west state highway in Rockingham County in southeastern New Hampshire. The western terminus is in Kensington at New Hampshire Route 150. The eastern terminus of NH 84 is in Hampton Falls at U.S. Route 1.

Route description
NH 84 begins at an intersection with NH 150 in Kensington. After less than a mile, it crosses into Hampton Falls, heading eastward towards downtown. NH 84 crosses over Interstate 95 without an interchange (access via NH 101 or NH 107) and turns north, ending at US 1 just feet from the eastern terminus of NH 88.

NH 84 is known as Kensington Road in Hampton Falls and Lamprey Road in Kensington.

title: New Hampshire Route 84


text:
Talk:Fidesz

Euroscepticism of Fidesz
I think that the consensus on this topic is outdated, as almost all political analyst thinks the same, Fidesz is eurosceptic. (https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/pce-2020-0009&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiOxpTa5Zn5AhXRhP0HHYOdDYMQFnoECAwQAg&usg=AOvVaw28Z_KRFuRXq9bFGVYsoA8F; https://www.jstor.org/stable/24919825; http://trulies-europe.de/?p=374; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324442121_Euroscepticism_and_populism_in_Hungary_The_analysis_of_the_prime_minister's_discourse) And even in English Wikipedia, it is listed as eurosceptic. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Eurosceptic_parties_in_Hungary) Also, the Hungarian wikipedia lists it as eurosceptic, as well. (https://hu.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidesz_%E2%80%93_Magyar_Polg%C3%A1ri_Sz%C3%B6vets%C3%A9g) Viktor Orbán, the prime minister of Hungary and the president of the Fidesz said in one of his speeches: „Brüsszel megtámadta Magyarországot”, or „Brussels attacked Hungary”. (https://miniszterelnok.hu/brussels-attacked-hungary/) Hungary had an advertisement campaign before the 2018 general elections, with the motto „Állítsuk meg Brüsszelt”, „Let's stop Brussels” in english, it cost 4.2 billion HUF or abozt 10.6 million US dollars. (https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/stop-brussels-european-commission-responds-hungarian-national-consultation_en; https://m.hvg.hu/gazdasag/20170612_42_milliardbol_ment_az_Allitsuk_meg_Brusszelt_kampany) The Hungarian minister of finances, Mihály Varga said, that Hungary should rethink the EU membership at the end of this decade, because the country will no longer have financial benefit from it. (https://index.hu/gazdasag/2021/08/12/varga-mihaly-eu-kilepes-unios-forras/ ) Viktor Orban said in 2020 during one of his speeches in Portugal, that „az EU-n kívül is van élet”, which means that „there is life outside the EU”, raising concerns about the views of the Hungarian government on this topic. (https://m.hvg.hu/itthon/20200201_Orban_Az_Europai_Union_kivul_is_van_elet) Keehnan455 (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Consensus is that "euroscepticism", which is not even an ideology, should not be kept in the infobox. Fidesz is Eurosceptic and this is already mentioned through out the article. Vacant0 (talk) 20:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

But a lot of parties have this in their Wikipedia page, like the BZÖ in Austria, just to show one from them. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_for_the_Future_of_Austria Keehnan455 (talk) 20:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Here are five more parties, all from Belgium: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Democrats_(Belgium) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertair,_Direct,_Democratisch https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Party_(Belgium) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivant https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlaams_Belang Keehnan455 (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Doesn't matter. What appears on other pages or wikis does not override the consensus that was reached for this page specifically. Vacant0 (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

But that means that the consensus is not in consensus with other pages. If there is a consensus from the opposite on these pages, that means that it should be applied here too, just to make Wikipedia more universal and transparent. It wouldn't make any sense to use a consensus on one page and an other for an other page about the same topic. Keehnan455 (talk) 20:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

 * There is no universal consensus that "euroscepticism" must be included in infoboxes, and just because it is included in some pages, it does not that this should apply to every other page. Page-specific consensus exists on this page, and on many others, and because of this "euroscepticism" should not be included in the infobox. Vacant0 (talk) 20:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

But it can case a false image that Fidesz is less eurosceptic than other parties, because those parties have euroscepticism included in the infobox, thus misinforming those people who don't want to read further in the page. Keehnan455 (talk) 20:30, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Euroscepticism is already mentioned in the lede, and considering that most of the readers do not go past this point, it's safe to assume that it won't create a false flag. Vacant0 (talk) 20:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't think that the majority if the readers get to that point, personally, I usually stop at the infobox, as there is every information I want to know. And if someone is searching for the ideologies of the party, I bet that he/she won't read further too, except if he/she wants a very detailed information, but it's not quite common. So I still think that excluding this ideology from the infobox is misleading the readers. Keehnan455 (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Even the Hungarian version of this wiki page lists euroscepticism as one of the ideologies of Fidesz, so it would be good to have the same rules for at least the same pages. Keehnan455 (talk) 21:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

 * I've already said "What appears on other pages or wikis does not override the consensus that was reached for this page specifically". Euroscepticism is excluded for a reason. Vacant0 (talk) 13:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

For what reason? Keehnan455 (talk) 15:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Map of democratic backsliding
The map needs an addendum -> "according to University of Gothenburg" - instead of being presented as universal fact. 86.10.112.125 (talk) 01:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Hungarian Turanism on Ideology
Since Orban took power, Fidesz has clearly made clear they are turanists https://hungarianspectrum.org/2018/08/13/the-flowering-of-pseudo-science-in-orbans-hungary/ and hungary becoming an observer for Organization of Turkic States in 2018 82.14.227.184 (talk) 14:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

 * That source rather seems to be a WP:BLOG, we'll need a better one to back up the claim that they are promoting Turanism. Vacant0 (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Anti-LGBTQ ideology
The Fidesz is opposing the LGBTQ propaganda in Hungary, like the KDNP and the Our Homeland Movement party. These 3 political parties opposing the Same Sex Marriages, and the LGBT couples, who they adopting the children in Hungary. The Fidesz also opposes the LGBTQ ideology. That's why i created the Organisations that opposes LGBT rights in Hungary page. The Fidesz, the KDNP and the Our Homeland Movement is part of the Anti-LGBTQ ideology. Just these 3 parties. KovZXad1970 (talk) 20:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Fidesz


text:
Paganitzu

Paganitzu is a puzzle video game created by Keith Schuler and published by Apogee Software for IBM PC compatibles in 1991. It is the sequel to Chagunitzu. The player controls Alabama "Al" Smith, who works his way through an ancient Aztec pyramid while solving Sokoban-like puzzles.

Paganitzu was published in three episodes: "Romancing the Rose", "The Silver Dagger", and "Jewel of the Yucatan". The first was distributed as shareware. In 2015, it was re-released on Steam with Microsoft Windows and macOS support.

Gameplay

The object of the game is to collect all the keys in a level to unlock the exit and try not to get killed by monsters and traps. The object of the third episode is to reach the statue with the yellow stone. Each episode has 20 levels, but episode 3 has one more playable level and four secret unplayable levels from Chagunitzu. Treasures can be collected for points and special encounters can be found for 500 points each. Some of the walls can be walked into to reveal secret passages. Dirt can be uncovered and rocks can be pushed around. Rocks pushed into water, lava or slime turn the spot into solid terrain. Each episode has different puzzles and enemy tackling.

Episode 1
Spiders can be killed by being cloistered in one square, which destroys anything but walls and Alabama around them and leaves behind some gems. If water pipes are destroyed the water will stop flowing. Certain spots teleport Alabama around the level. One trap Alabama will frequently face are spears that elongate and try to plunge into Alabama. Those traps can be disarmed by hitting something else that gets in their path as they elongate. Once disarmed, they block a certain amount of space. Also there are snakes that spit fire horizontally if Alabama crosses their path and to pass them, they must have an item, spider or boulder blocking their view. One unique puzzle requires Alabama to shed some light in a dark level before it can be completed.

Episode 2
Enemies in this episode cannot be killed and must be avoided at all costs. Levers in many of the levels can be pulled to switch flame traps on and off. One unique puzzle requires Alabama to pull a set of levers in the correct sequence.

Episode 3
Skeleton Lizards are completely harmless enemies that only obstruct Alabama. There are living pods that fire projectiles horizontally and vertically and must be dealt with in the same manner as the snakes. Throughout the levels Alabama will encounter statues with different functions. A statue with a yellow stone is used to exit to the next level. A statue with green arrows can be passed uni-directionally either horizontally or vertically. A statue with a blue stone is used to invert the arrows of a green statue. A statue with a red stone is used to remove one part of water. One unique puzzle requires Alabama to navigate through a maze of invisible walls.

title: Paganitzu


text:
New Hampshire Route 85

New Hampshire Route 85 (abbreviated NH Route 85 or NH 85) is a 4.854 mi north–south state highway in Rockingham County in southeastern New Hampshire. It runs from Exeter to Newfields.

The southern terminus of NH 85 is in downtown Exeter at New Hampshire Route 27 and New Hampshire Route 111A. The northern terminus is in Newfields at New Hampshire Route 108.

It runs along the west side of the Squamscott River for its entire length, opposite to NH 108, which runs east of the river.

Route description
NH 85 begins just west of downtown Exeter, at the intersection of Water Street and Main Street, although no signage is present. Heading westbound on Water Street, which initially carries NH 27 and NH 111A, these two routes transition over to Main Street, while Water Street splits off due north to carry NH 85. On its way out of town, NH 85 interchanges with the Exeter-Hampton Expressway (NH 101) at exit 10, before entering the town of Newfields. Continuing northbound, NH 85 intersects the eastern terminus of NH 87, a short route connecting with NH 125 in northern Epping. The road turns northeast for its last mile and ends at an intersection with NH 108, which provides access to the closely neighboring towns of Newmarket and Stratham.

title: New Hampshire Route 85


text:
Film Threat

Film Threat is an American online film review publication, and earlier, a national magazine that focused primarily on independent film, although it also reviewed videos and DVDs of mainstream films, as well as Hollywood movies in theaters. It first appeared as a photocopied zine in 1985, created by Wayne State University students Chris Gore and André Seewood. In 1997, Film Threat was converted to a solely online resource.

The current incarnation of Film Threat accepts money from filmmakers who are looking for a way to promote their films. Since 2011, those seeking a review from the site can pay between $50 and $400 for varying levels of service, ranging from a "guaranteed review within 7–10 days" to a package that includes a guarantee of "100K minimum impressions".

Beginning
The initial issues of Film Threat combined theories on cinematic narrative form and political ideology by Seewood and cinematic material and parody of mainstream film by Gore. In Gore's own words, "I thought, wouldn't it be great to start a punk rock-attitude movie magazine—and then, the people from this magazine would eventually go off and make films. Wouldn't it be great?"

In issue 9, Film Threat became a printed magazine, and also around this time, Seewood left the project to pursue independent filmmaking and to write seriously about the cinema. This second life of Film Threat included Gore and "Square Dance Instructor" Paul Zimmerman getting kicked out of the 1988 Toronto Festival of Festivals, only to return the following year under fake names representing a fake publication, Film Forum. In issue 18, San Francisco State student David E. Williams wrote in, sparking a friendship with Gore that led to both of them relocating to Los Angeles in summer 1989 to work on the magazine.

Larry Flynt Publications
During the early 1990s, Film Threat was transformed as Gore attempted to find a more mainstream release for the magazine, while its new offshoot Film Threat Video Guide, edited by Williams, continued to focus on the underground films and filmmakers that the magazine had featured in its early days. Film Threat eventually found a new home with Larry Flynt Publications (LFP), relaunching in November, 1991 as Volume 2, Issue 1. "I darted to the newsstand to grab the first glossy edition of what promised to be the turning of the tide for 'Let's-Blow-and-Stroke-the-Interviewee' type film journalism. And whose face did I see? Macaulay Culkin's," stated filmmaker Kevin Smith of the first issue of Film Threat's new edition.

In 1993, the magazine—then published bimonthly—had a circulation of 125,000, and was competing with such titles as Premiere. Paul Zimmerman became executive editor in 1994, and the magazine continued to grow, but Film Threat's tenure with LFP ended after 28 issues in February 1993.

Gore managed to buy back the rights from LFP, and launched the magazine, for a third time, in December 1996. He printed only two issues, before retiring the magazine in 1997.

Website
Gore launched Film Threat as a website in 1996. At first a sparse collection of film news, FilmThreat.com grew, covering both the indie and mainstream equally. Over the first 14 years of its online life, FilmThreat.com continued in the tradition of its print counterpart, courting controversy—such as when editor Ron Wells wrote a scathing criticism of Harry Knowles.

Chris Gore was succeeded as editor of the website by Ron Wells (1997–2003), who was then followed by Eric Campos (2003–6) and then Mark Bell (2006–8). Over the course of 2009, the site was edited by Don R. Lewis and Matthew Sorrento, before a brief hiatus where the site went offline in December 2009. On January 25, 2010, during the Sundance Film Festival, Gore sold the website and rights to the magazine to former editor Bell, who then relocated Film Threat to New Jersey and relaunched the website on February 23, 2010.

On May 11, 2011, Film Threat announced that it planned to produce a quarterly print and e-book edition beginning in September 2011, relying upon crowdfunding for the resources. The campaign to return Film Threat to print raised only $5,111 of its $60,000 crowd-funding goal (based on two coinciding $30000 campaigns, one of which was cancelled on June 11), and were unsuccessful in its attempt to raise the necessary monies by the conclusion of the crowdfunding campaign.

In 2011, Film Threat instituted a for-profit "unsolicited submission" service, charging independent filmmakers who wished to have their work reviewed by the site.

In 2015, Gore reacquired Film Threat and took the site offline, seeking to reboot the brand with a "Save Film Threat…" crowdfunding attempt at Kickstarter, which ran from March 19 to April 22. The attempt failed, with pledges totaling $63,725 falling short of the goal of $125,000. In late August 2016, Gore started another Kickstarter campaign to save and revamp the website with a more modest goal of $37,500. The campaign brought in $56,199 (against the stretch goal of $50,000, enabling the production of a documentary about Film Threat.)

Film Threat website relaunch
On February 6, 2017, the Film Threat website was relaunched.

It also has a presence on YouTube, where Gore reviews films, many of which are mainstream releases, alongside new personality Alan Ng. Gore also has playlists dedicated to various film festivals, and so-called "Gore Rants" where he rails against certain practices in Hollywood. One rant targeted people trying to profit from the untimely death of Collider founder John Schnepp, whom Gore knew.

Award This!
Film Threat held its fifth Award This! ceremony at the Frida Cinema on December 10, 2023, a venue they have returned to since 2021. Previous events were held at Studio Movie Grill in Glendale, California.

title: Film Threat


text:
New Hampshire Route 87

New Hampshire Route 87 is a 6.317 mi east–west highway in Rockingham County in southeastern New Hampshire connecting Newfields to Epping. The eastern terminus of NH 87 is in Newfields at its junction with New Hampshire Route 85. The western terminus is in Epping at its junction with New Hampshire Route 125.

Route description
NH 87 begins in the west at NH 125 in Epping, north of downtown. The highway proceeds eastward out of town and crosses into Newfields. NH 87 continues to the town center of Newfields, where it ends at an intersection with NH 85 near the Squamscott River.

In Newfields, the highway is known locally as Piscassic Road. In Epping, the highway is known locally as Hedding Road.

title: New Hampshire Route 87


text:
New Hampshire Route 88

New Hampshire Route 88 (abbreviated NH 88) is a 6.676 mi east–west state highway in Rockingham County in southeastern New Hampshire, United States. It runs from Hampton Falls to Exeter.

The western terminus of NH 88 is in Exeter at New Hampshire Route 108, though it is unsigned northwest of its intersection with New Hampshire Route 27 and New Hampshire Route 111 other than at the NH 108 intersection itself. The eastern terminus is in Hampton Falls at U.S. Route 1 (Lafayette Road).

Route description
NH 88 begins in the west at NH 108 on the northern edge of Exeter, less than 1/4 mi from the exit 11 junction with NH 101 (the Exeter-Hampton Expressway) in Stratham. The highway heads southeast, roughly paralleling NH 101 for 1.1 miles before intersecting NH 27/NH 111 east of town. This westernmost stretch of NH 88 is very poorly signed; in fact NH 88 westbound to NH 108 is completely unsigned from NH 27/NH 111. Signage on NH 108 approaching this intersection is ambiguous as to whether Holland Way (the official name of this stretch) is part of NH 88, or simply an access road "To 88". NH 88 briefly (and silently) overlaps NH 27 and NH 111, then NH 88 splits off southeast again and crosses into Hampton Falls. The highway continues for 5.5 mi, passes underneath Interstate 95 without an interchange and then terminates at US 1 in the center of town, just feet from the eastern terminus of NH 84.

Access to I-95 from NH 88 can be facilitated by either NH 107 in Seabrook or NH 101 in Hampton, both via US 1.

title: New Hampshire Route 88


text:
Old Yeller-Belly

"Old Yeller-Belly" is the nineteenth episode of the fourteenth season of the American television series The Simpsons. It originally aired on the Fox network in the United States on May 4, 2003. Santa's Little Helper fails to help Homer when he is trapped in a fire. He is rebuffed by the family, but eventually accepted again.

Plot
Bart and his friends in his treehouse try to eavesdrop on Lisa and her friends having a tea party, and the treehouse gets destroyed in the ensuing fight. The Amish build a grand new one but, ignorant of electricity, install the wiring wrongly. There is a fire at the party to mark the completion of the treehouse. Everyone gets out safely except Homer. Santa's Little Helper is there, but does not even try to save him. Snowball II climbs up to save him, scratching him hard to restore him to consciousness.

Homer becomes very fond and appreciative of Snowball II and very cold towards Santa's Little Helper, whom he labels a coward for leaving him for dead. The dog follows him everywhere trying to regain his acceptance, but Homer rebuffs him. Snowball II is a local hero. The local dog park is renamed the "Snowball II Municipal Cat Park". In an interview with Kent Brockman, Homer declares, "I have no dog!"

Santa's Little Helper is tethered in the backyard. There is an empty beer can there. Santa's Little Helper flips the can into the air, balancing it on his nose and drinking the last few drops. A Springfield Shopper reporter sees this and takes a photo, which appears on the front page of the newspaper. This gets the attention of Duff Beer, who announce that Duffman will be replaced with Santa's Little Helper, as their new mascot, Suds McDuff.

Suds McDuff boosts sales of Duff Beer and the family's fortunes explode. However, this prompts Santa's Little Helper's original sleazy owner and racing trainer (from the first episode) to visit the Simpsons and prove that he owns the dog by showing the interview footage of Homer disowning him. He becomes Suds' owner again and takes the earnings for himself.

The family manage to find Duffman, figuring that if they can get him to replace Suds as the Duff mascot, they can get their dog back. He is eager to join their scheme: he will help them get Santa's Little Helper back at a Duff Beer-sponsored beach volleyball event.

At the event, Homer pretends to be drowning, while he is actually floating on a keg of beer. As Homer expected, Santa's Little Helper is not brave enough to save him. However, when Duffman is called to save Homer, a shark is seen and Duffman refuses to go in. The shark tries to bite Homer, but bites the beer keg open instead and gets drunk. The crowd at the beach likes the shark, and Duff Beer announces that the shark — named Duff McShark — will be their new mascot. Santa's Little Helper returns to the Simpson family.

Cultural references

 * Yellow belly is an abusive term for a coward.
 * The episode title is a reference to the 1957 Disney live-action feature Old Yeller. Santa's Little Helper's alter ego as Suds McDuff is a reference to the old Bud Light mascot Spuds McKenzie.

title: Old Yeller-Belly


text:
Gilbert Blythe

Gilbert Blythe is a character in Lucy Maud Montgomery's Anne of Green Gables series of novels.

Character description
Gilbert is described in the books as being very handsome with brown, curly hair and hazel eyes. He is tall with a lean build and used to wear an Aegean hat.

In his youth, he seems aware of his good looks and popularity with the girls; perhaps because of this, he sometimes tends to look at them up and down making them blush. The dismissal of his affections toward the eponymous Anne Shirley, however, seems to ground him, and he matures and is well-liked by many. Throughout the series, Gilbert is depicted as a fair, practical and reliable man, who is inclined to have a "common sense" view of things. Keenly intelligent, he has a strong wit and sense of humour.

As Gilbert matures, he becomes less headstrong and demonstrates a sense of patience and devotion. He eventually becomes a highly respected doctor in the fictional town of Glen St Mary, Prince Edward Island (PEI), where he lives with his wife Anne, their children and the family's spinster housekeeper, Susan.

Series overview
Gilbert Blythe takes an immediate interest in Anne upon their first meeting and tries to gain her attention; however, when Anne ignores him, he teasingly calls her "Carrots" because of her red hair, unaware of her sensitivity about it. In response, Anne smashes her slate over his head in anger; and despite his attempts to apologize, she refuses to forgive him for several years. Throughout the entire first book, Gilbert repeatedly shows admiration for Anne, but she coldly rebuffs him. She continues her grudge even after he rescues her from the pond after a near-disastrous reenactment of Tennyson's "Lancelot and Elaine." When Anne refuses his offer of friendship after the incident, Gilbert decides to respond in kind and stops openly trying to gain her attention. They develop a strong academic rivalry instead (though the competition is entirely good-natured on Gilbert's side), and Anne gradually acknowledges Gilbert as an intellectual equal; they eventually compete to win scholarships at Queens Academy.

Following his time at Queens, Gilbert decides to teach at the Avonlea school to finance his future college education. When one of Anne's guardians, Matthew, dies of a heart attack, Anne chooses to give up the Avery Scholarship to stay at Green Gables and support Marilla. After learning of Anne's predicament, Gilbert, who has always loved Anne, gives up his position so Anne can teach in Avonlea and live at Green Gables with Marilla. Gilbert teaches at the White Sands School and Anne, after learning of his noble act, finally forgives him and becomes good friends.

During the two years Anne teaches in Avonlea, Gilbert and Anne become very close. At the end of their teaching 'chapter in life,' Anne starts to have stronger feelings towards him but does not recognize them as love. Gilbert aspires to become a doctor and goes on to study at Redmond College, where he is joined by Anne, freed of personal obligations after the widowed Rachel Lynde moves to Green Gables to keep Marilla company, in Anne of the Island.

Gilbert's feelings for Anne become increasingly apparent during their first year of college, while Anne becomes uncomfortable around him because she believes her feelings for Gilbert are entirely platonic as he does not match her idealized notion of true love, which requires a dark, proud, melancholy and over-romanticized hero. However, Anne's jealousy of Gilbert's other potential love interests, her moments of physical attraction for him, and her deep respect and devotion to their friendship suggest that she may be falling in love with him without realizing it.

In their second year of college, Gilbert proposes but Anne refuses him, saying she doesn't care for him "in that way" and that she only wants to be his friend. Disappointed, Gilbert reveals that "your friendship can't satisfy me, Anne. I want your love -- and you tell me I can never have that". Their relationship becomes awkward, especially after Anne meets and is courted by fellow Redmond student Roy Gardner, a man who at first seems to personify her "ideal", although Anne secretly admits to herself that Roy lacks certain qualities and that she and Roy do not share a sense of humor. Gilbert seems to concede defeat and Anne believes that he has become involved with another student, Christine Stuart, who is later revealed to be only a friend. Instead, he focuses his attention on obtaining the Cooper Prize, a prestigious scholarship that will allow him to attend medical school.

Not long after graduation, Gilbert contracts typhoid fever as a result of physically exhausting himself during school. Anne, who has recently refused a proposal of marriage from Roy Gardner after realizing during his proposal that she does not love Roy, is shocked to learn that Gilbert may die. She realizes that she loves and has always loved him; that "she belonged to him and he to her", and recognizes at last that she mistook her "bond" to Gilbert for strong friendship instead of love, while her relationship with Roy was merely "flattered fancy." Gilbert also admits that he never loved Christine Stuart; she was already engaged and he had been ordered to look after her while she was at college.

Gilbert recovers from his illness and resumes his friendship with Anne after learning she refused Roy Gardner. He proposes to her again and she accepts. However, they remain engaged for three years, as Gilbert intends to finish his medical course before marrying her; they correspond regularly in their time apart (Anne of Windy Poplars), while Anne works as a principal at Summerside High School.

The two marry in Anne's House of Dreams and move to the town of Glen St. Mary, where Gilbert takes over his uncle's medical practice. He proves to be an excellent and well-respected doctor. Their married life is very happy and they have seven children: Joyce (also called Joy; died as an infant), James Matthew (Jem), Walter Cuthbert (who dies during the First World War), Anne and Diana (twins; also called Nan and Di), Shirley (the youngest boy), and Bertha Marilla (called Rilla).

Within Montgomery's lifetime, the series ends in 1919 and Anne and Gilbert are happy; Gilbert is 55 and still sincerely in love with Anne of Green Gables. Montgomery subsequently submitted the short story collection The Blythes Are Quoted to her publisher very shortly before her death in 1942, although it was not published until the 21st century. In this collection, in which the Blythe family appears often as secondary characters, the series is extended into the very early 1940s. Still living in Glen St. Mary, Gilbert and Anne are the grandparents of at least five children, several of whom are off to fight in World War II.

Screen portrayals
In the 1919 film adaptation, Gilbert was portrayed by Paul Kelly. In the 1934 film adaptation, Gilbert was portrayed by Tom Brown. In the 1940 sequel Anne of Windy Poplars, Gilbert was portrayed by Patric Knowles. In the 1972 BBC TV adaptation, the young Gilbert was played by Robin Halstead, and in the follow-up series, Anne of Avonlea, the adult Gilbert was played by Christopher Blake.

Gilbert was portrayed by Jonathan Crombie in the CBC Television film adaptations of 1985, 1987, and 2000. In the Japanese anime adaptation of Anne of Green Gables, he is voiced by Kazuhiko Inoue. The CD recording of the musical that has run for more than 40 years at the Charlottetown Festival, focusing on Anne and Gilbert's relationship, features Andrew MacBean as Gilbert. Gilbert was portrayed by Drew Haytaoglu in the 2016 film L.M. Montgomery's Anne of Green Gables. Gilbert is portrayed by Lucas Jade Zumann in the 2017 CBC and Netflix series Anne with an E. Gilbert was also portrayed by Dylan Duff in the 2019 play/film Anne of Green Gables.

title: Gilbert Blythe


text:
User talk:Larry24

Larry Rice- Mandolin Player- Born- Danville,Va. April 24th 1949

title: User talk:Larry24