text:
User talk:Spikebrennan

Philadelphia Project
Hi i have noticed that you have edited several articles on subjects related to the Philadelphia area. Several other users and myself have got together to creak a project to help improve, expand, and create articles concerning the Philadelphia/Delaware Valley region. While our project is still new, we are inviting people to join us to help it get started off on the right foot. You can find the project at WikiProject Philadelphia, feel free to add your name and drop off an suggestions that you might have. If you have any questions, drop me a line anytime. Thanks. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 04:28, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * n/p --Boothy443 | trácht ar 23:51, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the note on Richardson Dilworth. I'll check into WikiProject Philadelphia. This is my first dip into Wikipedia in quite awhile and I don't much know what I'm doing, so I'll have to feel my way. I grew up and lived in the Powelton Village area for many years, where my mother had been quite active in the community. I've also been researching a murder that took place there in 1900 which I've been half-heartedly turning into a novel. In the meantime I've updated a few areas such as MOVE and Frank Rizzo. I was thinking of adding just a bit on Ira Einhorn, but is he really worth it? Dsbd 21:08, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

 * Good catch on the Amoroso name...my bad on that one.--Looper5920 15:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I believe dominant is the right word for this one. If you go to the Links section of their website and see who they distribute to it is safe to consider them tops.  If you want to change it maybe "preeminent" might be a better word?  My opinion--Looper5920 15:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Main Line category
Like the new category but I would caution against putting entire counties in there. For example, while some of DelCo is considered the main line you would never consider darby and yeadon as Main Line townships. My personal opinion is that it might be better to stick with towns vice counties.--Looper5920 10:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

FYI - I put prod on List of words and phrases alleged to be derived from misunderstandings
IMHO it's not really the right kind of material for a wikipedia article - basically being unverifable. Please discuss at the article (and provide sources) if you feel different. Cheers. Megapixie 08:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Beaver
What the dickens is it about Beaver that makes it so popular with the vandals (beside the obvious)? Bridesmill 19:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I do doubt the veracity of the citations (re. beaver + pope = fish). I'm certain they're genuine, but 'beavers were once considered fish by the Catholic Church' is (I suspect) an urban legend with a substantial spread. In other words, they're fallible.

None of the sources cited were experts on Catholicism or the period in question. The closest it came was a page on Catholic practices (which, if it ever contained anything about beaver counting as fish, doesn't any more) and an article by a Swedish natural scientist (as a Protestant during the Enlightenment, someone with a lot of irreconcilable baggage against and not necessarily the best source on the practices of the Church).

It stinks of an urban legend to me, and I'm of the school that if you can't prove something asserting it is ridiculous, especially if it's fairly ridiculous on its face to begin with. ACK-47 01:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Adding Articles to the WP:AFD
Thank you for taking the time to add an article to the WP:AFD. Please review these steps in order for the community to properly review an article for deletion. I formatted your request properly, but you will know for the future. Thanks! --Porqin 17:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)lol

Empty articles
Hello,

Please to to avoid adding empty articles to Wikipedia, as they provide no meaningful content. 13:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC) yeah and also Im bored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XxTheKnowAll233xX (talk • contribs) 19:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the Compliment
I just wished to thank you for the kind compliment on Talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Please feel free to improve Sports in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania the sports section of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania or any other part of that article. -- danntm T C 01:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello im sorry to talk through this but my name is XxKnowAll233xX and I will be delited to speak about something with one of you so, please contact me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by XxTheKnowAll233xX (talk • contribs) 19:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Wanamaker organ
Hello--I noticed you were putting the wanamaker organ up as a FAC. Are you really serious about this? I would be thrilled to see it on the front page because I've put alot of work into it, my father being the manager of the Friends of the Wanamaker Organ, but I don't think it's up to par. Do you have any suggestions as to how to proceed in improving it? AdamBiswanger1 19:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe you are right. I just feel that it's a bit too short and it doesn't have enough references (something I was going to fix with the wealth of books under my father's control).  Other than that, though, you are right.  It's very good . AdamBiswanger1 22:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Philadelphia vote
I don't understand your "rule is a rule" reasoning for opposing the move. Like Kafziel pointed out earlier, "consensus dictates convention, not the other way around". The only reason New York City and Chicago are listed as exceptions is because editors on their respective pages voted to make them exceptions. To use the fact that this city is not yet explicitly listed as an exception as a reason to oppose making it an exception is nonsensical. --Serge 17:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

You wrote, "If what you really want to do is change the general U.S. city naming convention, then I would urge you to resume the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements)/U.S. convention change (August 2006)". Do you not understand what Kafziel means when he writes, "Consensus dictates convention, not the other way around"? The written conventions simply reflect what the conventions are; they do not determine what they are. They are not rules. And that's not where they are changed. They are changed at the individual article level, and then the written reflection of what the conventions are are updated accordingly (like Chicago was added to the exception list after editors decided it would be an exception not on the naming convention page, but on the individual article's page. I think you're not understanding the feedback mechanism that must be in place here.  Yes, the convention guidelines provide guidance in those situations where guidance is being sought - the only way conventions could ever change is through the mechanism we're using here, at the article level.  Therefore it makes no sense to cite the rule as the reason to oppose a given case being an exception to that rule.   You say your concern is a slippery slope leading to a lack of coherent policy.  I think you're confusing the process of policy evolution with policy elimination.  Please read all the comments and discussion and reconsider your vote, and decide on the individual merits of whether Philadelphia should be an exception or not (and, if not, please specify the reason(s) you believe it specifically should not be an exception). Thanks. --Serge 18:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Good and productive discussion. Thanks. Users like you make Wikipedia work. --Serge 01:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I've had others initially disagree with me on this issue and then some weeks later let me know they've seen the light... You seem objective and rational enough to come around too. We'll see...  I'll leave you with this to think about: the main point is we already have a convention that is shared by all Wikipedia articles, including most city articles in other countries - use the most common name unless there is an ambiguity issue (and use the disambiguation convention in those cases, and in those cases only). There is no reason to have an inconsistent guideline that calls for applying a disambiguation format on an article name that has no ambiguity issues, which is easily determined by whether the common name redirects to the article anyway (e.g., Philadelphia -> Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). If there is such a reason, what is it? And why is it not expressed in the discussion section of the voting on Talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania? --Serge 01:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

L.A. vote
Since you recently voted on the Philadelphia move, I thought you might want to know about a similar vote at Los Angeles. See Talk:Los Angeles, California. --Serge 18:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Cloud-gate-from-underneath.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cloud-gate-from-underneath.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JeremyA 22:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC) actually I do

Philly meetup
Hi! There will be a Wikipedia Meetup in Philadelphia on 4 November. If you're interested in coming, RSVP by editing Meetup/Philadelphia 2 to reflect the likelihood of your being able to attend. If you have any questions, feel free to ask CComMack's. Hopefully, we'll all see you (and each other) on the 4th! --evrik 19:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

FP Promotion
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Abraham Lincoln head on shoulders photo portrait.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-03-04.  howcheng  {chat} 18:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the review
I know you wrote the comments over a month ago, but thanks for your comments on Picture peer review/Sculpture. They were much apprechiated. --Whats new? 06:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Templates
Thanks for your comments and help with Bryn Mawr. I have made a few templates and can offer some help, but User:VerruckteDan is probably a better person to ask (he made all the PA county nav boxes). One question I have is how do you know what is part of the Main Line and what is not? Better phrased: What is the source you have for what is part of it or not?

One nice thing with the county templates is you know what is already a city / borough / twp / CDP and have the county and census to use as sources (though even there we have the towns in PA question, just Bloomsburg or McCandless too?). Ruhrfisch 02:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Tvashtarvideo
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Tvashtarvideo.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-29.  howcheng  {chat} 17:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Delaware county
Hi, just noticed your request on wikiproject maps. I made this image based on the map of the county. Did I remove the right dotted lines? I could make a series of these for the other townships if you would like. Regards, --Astrokey 44 03:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, I have updated the image and also made a few others. --Astrokey 44 16:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ive finished the boroughs and townships now. Tell me if there are any problems --Astrokey 44 04:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/The First Telegraph.jpg
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:The First Telegraph.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-10-24.  howcheng  {chat} 17:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Sports in North American Cities
Template:Sports in North American Cities has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Btw, it's nothing personal, I just don't think the template is very useful. heqs ·:. 09:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/William Tecumseh Sherman
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Tecumseh sherman.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-10-25.  howcheng  {chat} 17:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
 * Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
 * Join our mailing list
 * Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up!  Cbrown1023   talk   04:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Buffalo Bill
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Cody-Buffalo-Bill-LOC.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-06.

Use of image on Apple's website
Hi there. You invited me to email you regarding the issue I had with Apple. I emailed you on the 3rd of July and did not hear back from you. Did you get the email? Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I emailed the same address last time but I have just now forwarded the original email to you. Can you confirm if you've received it this time? Thanks. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't mean to be impatient but I have emailed you twice now over the last two weeks and have not heard back. Can you confirm you received my email on the 11th of July? Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 19:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Unless you sent the email in the last 24 hours or so, I don't think I received it (can't check it at the moment though)! Very strange.. could I ask you to resend it and cc diliff@gmail.com? Thanks, and sorry for the trouble. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 08:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Sitting Bull
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Sitting Bull - edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-16.  howcheng  {chat} 17:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Two liberty place.JPG
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Moving images to the Commons. Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! Sfan00 IMG 20:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Buchenwald slave laborers
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Buchenwald Slave Laborers Liberation.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-21.  howcheng  {chat} 01:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/Image:Horseanatomy.png
Hi Spike, I was wondering if I could get you to take another look at the delist nomination for based on my comment directly after yours. I Have corrected the problems with the diagram and am slightly upset about the delist nom as the nominator only gave me 36 hours to make corrections, and delisted it despite me telling them I would make the changes today. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 22:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Reynold Club
I've uploaded an edit that attempts to correct some persepective distortion and fringing. Unfortunately, I couldn't fix all of the tilt and I had to stretch the pic (hence the larger resolution), so it is somewhat upsampled. Because of this, I'm not nominating it as an alternative, but if you like it better, feel free to add it, etc. thegreen J      Are you green?  21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh... Oh well. thegreen J      Are you green?  00:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I uploaded a new version (same name) that tries to fix some of its predecessor's mistakes. It doesn't look all that much better, but just to let you know... thegreen J      Are you green?  03:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Hitler and Mussolini
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Hitlermusso2 edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-06.  howcheng  {chat} 23:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * FYI, this has been pushed back to December 14 due to concerns about featuring a Hitler image during Hanukkah.  howcheng  {chat} 18:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Mulberry Street, New York City
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-19.  howcheng  {chat} 18:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Missing image Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 12:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Wanted!
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:John Wilkes Booth wanted poster new.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-21.  howcheng  {chat} 17:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Trans-Neptunian Objects
Hey, yes you are right; no consensus essentially. In any case, nominations need at least four or more votes in support, and consensus is usually a two-third majority in support. Hope that helps. -- Chris B  •  talk  14:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

WP Philly
--evrik (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Philly meetup #5
Please look at Meetup/Philadelphia 5 and give your input about the next meet-up. Thank you.--evrik (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Frederick Douglass
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Frederick Douglass portrait.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 1, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-02-01. Just in time to mark the beginning of Black History Month. :)  howcheng  {chat} 17:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Eddie Rickenbacker Bombs the Germans
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Bombers of WW1.ogg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 24, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-04-24.  howcheng  {chat} 22:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Commons image pages
There are two tabs at the top of each commons image page, one that says "en", which links directly to the en image page and there's checkusage which links to http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/CheckUsage.php. MER-C 09:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Various featured picture candidacies
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Etna eruption seen from the International Space Station.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 23, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-02-23.  howcheng  {chat} 18:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Brandenburg Gate Quadriga at Night.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 25, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-02-25.  howcheng  {chat} 22:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik.jpg
Thank you very much for use my photo Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik.jpg in Tile! Keep up good work! Best wishes --Beyond silence 18:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Various featured picture candidacies
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Arc Triomphe.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 6, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-06.  howcheng  {chat} 00:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Annie Oakley shooting glass balls, 1894.ogv is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 7, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-07. Note that this will the first time a video is being featured on the Main Page (AFAIK anyway).  howcheng  {chat} 01:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Diffusion tensor imaging
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:DTI-sagittal-fibers.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 10, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-10.  howcheng  {chat} 01:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Leopard Tortoise FPC
Hi Thanks for your vote and your constructive criticism. I am an amateur and all comments are much welcome. I just wanted to inform you that two users have uploaded edited versions of the image. Would you please see them and perhaps reconsider your vote? Regards, Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 14:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Tortoise FPCC
Hi, Could you please give your opinion on the images here before I nominate for Featured Picture? Thanks, Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 19:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Gibraltar map
I added a new edit to the Gibraltar map. I fixed the spelling in both versions, and the second has been rescaled and the text converted to paths, which should make it render properly. Let me know if this still doesn't work. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 17:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Ireland from space
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Ireland from space edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 15, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-15.  howcheng  {chat} 23:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
From Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

If you object to the above message, please remove it, accept my apologies and notify me on my talk page.

Featured picture candidates/Rough Rider Roosevelt
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Theodore Rooseveltnewtry.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 1, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-07-01.  howcheng  {chat} 04:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Carpenter (nomination 2)
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:PalmercarpenterA.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 23, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-05-23.  howcheng  {chat} 16:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Curse of the Billy Goat
I think a specific curse is funnier than merely listing all known curses. It's the same reason Buttered cat paradox is linked to rather than Category:Paradoxes. It might make sense to link to sports-related curses in the summary, however. Feezo (Talk) 05:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Unseen side of Mercury
Hi Spike,

I've nominated this for delisting at to be replaced by a larger version which is also in color. Regards,  howcheng  {chat} 22:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Govende
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Govende, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Govende. Jfire (talk) 04:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Priapus statuette
Hey, would you be interested in nominating this on Commons too? I like the shot and it has encyclopedic value. And - don't know how to say this exactly - there's an IP over there that's tried to nominate several close-up photos of female genitalia in the last week. As a heterosexual female I'd like a fair share of fun. ;) Cheers,  Durova Charge! 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Govende
I have nominated Govende, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Govende. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jfire (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Mice galaxies
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:NGC4676.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 27, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-27.  howcheng  {chat} 00:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Your Images

 * True, but you seem to have nominated several images, so you deserve it :) -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  21:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

FPC Again
Hi, Sorry to bother you once more, but since you took the time to help me choose a candidate for FPC from my tortoise pictures, I would like to request you to please vote for the picture here. Thanks again for your help.

Regards, Muhammad (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Immortal Game
Hi, I just realized that you had taken the Immortal Game image to FPC. I stopped editing with that account and switched to one with my name... I will take a look at the comments and see what I can do to modify the image so that it might pass, however I really don't have any experience with picture editing beyond stringing individual frames together. HansHermans (talk) 05:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Beautiful holiday idea you had. Cheers! Durova Charge! 05:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Malcolm X
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Malcolm X NYWTS 2a.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 29, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-07-29.  howcheng  {chat} 17:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Andrew Johnson
I've re-upped a newer version here: Image:Andrew johnson2.png

let me know what you think.  Jaakobou Chalk Talk  14:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Copyright
Since you're a lawyer, would you mind weighing in on this? Thegreenj 22:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

April Fool's Day DYK

 * The "Ben Affleck" article appeared in the first April Fool's group. The second and final group is up now. Royal broil  18:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Sultana image
I uploaded a version to Featured picture candidates/Sultana (steamboat) that is just below the 1000px threshold if you'd like to comment again. MrPrada (talk) 23:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you very much for your comment regarding one of my pictures. Though the result is hundred percent oppose, I learned many issues related to photography from your and others comments. Since I am a novice in the filed of photography, I am still in my learning phase and would like to receive tips from you. I hope you won't mind if I request you in future to guide me through your comments regarding my pictures. Cheers. -- Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  14:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Hurricane Katrina flooding (edit 1)
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:KatrinaNewOrleansFlooded edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 29, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-08-29.  howcheng  {chat} 16:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Andrew Johnson
Heyo, I cleaned up the Andrew Johnson image a little while back (uploaded over the previous file) and I was wondering if you'd be interested in renominating for FPC (See ). I'm thinking that the image needs smaller previews also, since the full size is a bit overwhelming and the background is a little messy, his face is ultra-clean though.  Jaakobou Chalk Talk  10:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:City hall and clothespin.JPG
Someone listed your image for deletion on Commons because it "infringes copyrighted sculpture by Claes Oldenburg." You may want to say something on the talk page there. --EvaK (talk) 10:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cloud-gate.JPG
Hi, whilst going through the Commons deleting images of Cloud Gate as the result of a deletion discussion there, I came across this image that you uploaded. Is it OK with you if I delete this image too, or would you prefer it to go through a deletion request? The reason that the Commons images were deleted is that the copyright of the sculpture belongs to the artist, and unfortunately in the US the freedom of panorama laws do not provide an exemption for sculptures in public places (as is true in other countries). Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 14:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

 * OK. Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

sumo print
How did you know that Image:Somagahana Fuchiemon restored.jpg is Kunisada? Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

images
Several of your old, orphaned images were nominated for ifd. I didn't want to clog your page with a ton of notifications, so they're. rootology ( C )( T ) 19:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Fall of Lucifer
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 22:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Artifact help
Image:Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,.jpg has some artifacts, would you try and remove the majority of them? I knew you were skilled with "people" pictures but this one has a large amount of artifacting, so, beware. ;) — Ceran ( dream / discover ) 00:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * See my comment to the FPC nom page. I do not have this skill.  Spikebrennan (talk) 19:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
Muhammad (talk) 09:37, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Featured Documents
Are we going ahead with this now? Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates
I have commented on the points you raised at the above discussion. I'm glad that this discussion will soon be underway. It's high time we had a set of criteria for featured document candidates. Hopefully this will clear everything up. Cheers, Elucidate ( light up ) 19:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I contributed and invited Kaldari to also do so. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: your comment
That would be wonderful, if they're public domain? I've always thought we ought to have at least one Alice in Wonderland illustration featured too. :) Best regards,  Durova Charge! 19:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Dan & Dave
--Dravecky (talk) 07:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

April Fool's DYK for Peter Jackson (table tennis)
Thank you for your contribution to the April Fool's Day fun and thanks for your effort with the discussion!  Royal broil  00:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

April Fool's DYK for Egypt, Pennsylvania
Gatoclass (talk) 08:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

April Fool's DYK for Banana beer
Thank you for your contribution to April Fool's Day 2009!  Royal broil  22:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

April Fool's DYK for John P. Roberts
Thank you for your contribution to April Fool's Day 2009!  Royal broil  22:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Spike,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Somagahana Fuchiemon restored.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 11, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-05-11.  howcheng  {chat} 04:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Psst
I have a copy of the N. C. Wyeth Treasure Island. Want to work on restoring the images with me? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Review of "Interstate 476"
As part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007, Interstate 476 has been re-reviewed against current GA standards. The article will be placed on hold until issues can be addressed. If an editor does not express interest in addressing these issues within seven days, the article will be delisted. You are being notified because of your major contributions to this article. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  00:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Spikebrennan
I believe I answered your question here: Featured picture candidates/Lofty Mount Lu, by Shen Zhou. Regards.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 14:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of place names starting with "The"
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of place names starting with "The", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern:
 * This article appears to be original research "listcruft". No assertion of notability has been made, and would not seem to be written in world view.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scjessey (talk) 00:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

 * Since I hate seeing anything deleted I thought I'd post this here instead of adding to the thread on the page itself: It's a vaguely interesting topic, but I note that almost all the Wikipedia pages linked to do not use the word "The" in the place name, with the exception of The Bottom, The Bronx, and The Gambia. The link to The Riviera is not to what is expected. Also, the whole introduction seems iffy. The Pacific, the Great Plains, the Alps, etc--these are not examples of places with the word "the" in them. It is normal to use the word "the" when referring to any river, ocean, etc. That does not make it part of the proper name itself. Same with "the" United States, West Indies, Bahamas, Upper West Side, etc. "The" is part of common usage, not the proper name itself. At least that is my understanding. I'd be interested in a good source that actually addressed this topic, being a toponymy geek and all. The six sites you listed on the talk page are all blogs, forums, or random people writing unsourced stuff. A better source would be nice. Pfly (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum
Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

City Hall Photo
Hello Mr. Spikebrennan

I'm working on a project and was wondering about licensing your photo for use in a poster. The budget is modest, it's for a one-day thing, but I'd like to do right by you and pay you something for your efforts. I could always use another photo, but I like what you've done. Please get back to me soon, since I'm trying to finalize the design.

Thanks John Freeborn, 4/17/2010

email: john.freeborn@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnfreeborn (talk • contribs) 04:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2
Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 12:44, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2 results
Hi, because you contributed to FPC's recent review, I'm letting you know that the results of the poll have been posted. We appreciate your contributions to the first stage and hope you take part in this next step, here, to move towards implementing several changes to the process. Regards,  Mae din\ talk 18:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Sul Ross statue
Thank you for participating in my FPC nomination. I understand that this FPC will not pass, but I was considering re-shooting the photo and renominating at a later date to address the concerns expressed there. Could you explain why you believe the EV is dubious? A paragraph at the Lawrence Sullivan Ross article reads:
 * "Within weeks of Ross's death former cadets at Texas AMC began gathering funds for a monument. In 1917, the state appropriated $10,000 for the monument, and two years later a 10 foot (3 m) bronze statue of Ross, sculpted by Pompeo Coppini, was unveiled at the center of the Texas AMC campus. In more recent years, students began the tradition of placing pennies at the feet of statue before exams for good luck. School legend states that Ross would often tutor students, and as payment would accept only a penny for their thoughts. At exam time his statue, located in Academic Plaza, is often covered in pennies."

Just hoping to get feedback so I don't waste my time. Thanks.  Jujutacular  T · C 20:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback. About EV: I would argue that the point of the photo is only somewhat used to depict what he looks like, and more to do with his "legacy" (hence being in that section of the article). On my potential re-shoot I would try to employ better composition to focus on the statue itself. I would also make sure a heftier amount of pennies can be seen at his feet, which also adds EV. About copyright status: I am quite sure it is public domain. It was erected in 1918, and "unveiled" in 1919. From the licensing page you linked, (Freedom_of_panorama): "...public artwork installed before 1923 is considered to be public domain, and can be photographed freely." Thanks again for the feedback, it has been quite helpful. Happy editing!  Jujutacular  T · C 03:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Delist nom of an FPC that you nominated
Just so you know, I have nominated the image for delisting.  upstate NYer  01:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Suburban station.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Suburban station.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lansdowne_Herakles.JPG
You uploaded the photo of the Lansdowne Herakles as your own work, but did not include any licensing template on the image page. Could you please add one so that we can keep using the photon on the Getty Villa page? Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 18:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

You're invited to the Philadelphia Wiknic!

This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area this Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 5 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together in the Azalea Garden, just behind the Philadelphia Museum of Art 39.96801°N, -75.18316°W

Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.

If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.

Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!

Smallbones (talk) 17:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

FP delist
Please see for a replacement request. Thanks.  howcheng  {chat} 17:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Community input required: lowering delist bar at FPC
You are receiving this because of your current or past association with the Featured Pictures project. Following on from several cases where closers did not observe the prescribed minimum votes required for a delisting, there is now a motion to entirely dismiss the requirement for a minimum. Please participate in the discussion as wide-ranging changes may arise.

Link: Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 14:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Philadephia skyline
I am sorry to bother you, I am writing this correspondence to bring an image to your attention. I recently came across an image of the philly skyline that may be of interest to you. Even thought. the image seem like the comcast building is incomplete, it give a good scale of the buildings relationships to one another esp. Liberty Place bldgs, mellon bldg, verizon tower, & the blue cross blue shield bldg, which I & everyone else who does not live in philly can appreciate. I am writing to you because I do not have an acct in wiki & I do not know who the admin of the philly skyline wiki is.

http://bodyofproof.wikia.com/wiki/File:Phil-skyline.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.154.38 (talk) 00:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Spikebrennan/Scat

A tag has been placed on User:Spikebrennan/Scat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Image
Hello Spikebrennan, could you please contact me regarding licensing of your Santa Monica sunset image for a documentary? ASAP? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Y marianna (talk • contribs) 22:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your thoughts?
Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Frederick Douglass (circa 1879).jpg scheduled for POTD
Hi Spikebrennan,

This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Frederick Douglass (circa 1879).jpg, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 3, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-10-03. I have no idea why this image has taken so long to become POTD. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:Spikebrennan


text:
User talk:Pseudomonas

If you want to report issues with adding births and deaths to the date pages, please READ THIS PAGE first.

Please Click here to add a new comment to this page.

Oct 30th 1987 Paul Roe Programmer and Hacktivist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World_Security_School

Use of images
Hi Pseudomonas,

I understand the usage as you have stated, unfortunately my publisher won't recognize the public domain usage without direct approval - this has been very frustrating for me, but I must comply if I want to publish the book I am writing ... thanks for taking an interest, kind regards, Paul Brunton.

Uuuu
Kkkk 49.206.50.92 (talk) 15:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Pseudomonas


text:
User:Platypus222

 I AM the Platypus Man

title: User:Platypus222


text: File:Greetings heiwa.jpg

title: File:Greetings heiwa.jpg


text:
Heiwa (album)

Heiwa is a 2002 album by jazz fusion band Greetings From Mercury. It is the second release compiled in the 11-CD box edited by De Werf the same year. It was also distributed as a simple album by Bang Records (with a different cover).

Track listing

 * 1) "One by One"
 * 2) "my Mojo=my Dojo"
 * 3) "Tanger la Nuit"
 * 4) "Cold Rain DNA"
 * 5) "Heiwa"
 * 6) "We Must"
 * 7) "Closer"
 * 8) "2001"
 * 9) "Darkhauns (alap-jod-jahla)"
 * 10) "Everyone's World"

Personnel

 * Jeroen Van Herzeele - tenor saxophone, leader
 * Peter Hertmans - guitar
 * Otti Van Der Werf - electric bass
 * Stéphane Galland - drums
 * Steven Segers - rap
 * Michel Andina - sitar
 * DJ Grazzhoppa - wheelz of steel on 6,7 and 10

title: Heiwa (album)


text: Category:People from Guangdong

title: Category:People from Guangdong


text:
The Velvelettes

The Velvelettes were an American singing girl group, signed to Motown in the 1960s. Their biggest chart success occurred in 1964, when Norman Whitfield produced "Needle in a Haystack", which peaked at number 45 on the Billboard Hot 100, and number 27 in Canada.

Early years and establishment
The group was founded in 1961 by Bertha Barbee-McNeal (June 12, 1940 – December 15, 2022) and Mildred Gill Arbor, students at Western Michigan University. Mildred recruited her younger sister Carolyn (also known as Cal or Caldin), who was in 9th grade, and Cal's friend Betty Kelley, a junior in high school. Bertha recruited her cousin Norma Barbee, a freshman at Flint Junior College. Cal was chosen as the group's lead singer.

A classmate at Western Michigan University, Robert Bullock, was Berry Gordy's nephew, and he encouraged the group to audition for Motown. The group signed to Motown in late 1962 and started recording in January 1963. They recorded at the Hitsville USA studio and "There He Goes" and "That's The Reason Why", produced by William Stevenson, was released as a single via the IPG Records label (Independent Producers Group). The recordings included a young Stevie Wonder playing harmonica. While the group awaited their chance at stardom, they recorded for many producers, some of which were re-recorded by other artists including fellow labelmates Martha and the Vandellas and The Supremes.

The Velvelettes got their break chartwise in the spring of 1964 thanks to young producer Norman Whitfield, who produced "Needle in a Haystack" as a single for the group, on Motown's VIP Records imprint. "Needle in a Haystack" peaked at number 45 on the Billboard Hot 100 in mid 1964. The group recorded its follow-up, "He Was Really Sayin' Somethin'", with Whitfield again producing, and spent time on various Motown-sponsored tours as a support act. In September 1964, Betty Kelley officially left the group to join Martha and the Vandellas, and the quintet became a quartet.

Later years and dissolution
The Velvelettes continued performing, with various members leaving and rejoining, as family matters dictated. By 1967, Gill, Norma and Bertha Barbee-McNeal had decided to devote all of their time to raising their families. Cal recruited two new members for concert performances: future Vandella Sandra Tilley (who was introduced by her friend Abdul Fakir of The Four Tops), and Annette McMillan.

With a song on the charts and a place on several concert tours, an album project was started using songs already recorded. However, with the growing success of other Motown groups such as The Supremes, Motown's attention was diverted and the project was left unfinished. The LP was scheduled for release on Motown's V.I.P. label, as V.I.P 401.

Motown released two additional singles, "Lonely Lonely Girl Am I" and "A Bird in the Hand" on their V.I.P. imprint. Both singles did not reach the same chart levels as their predecessors. The Velvelettes continued to record new material until September 1967, with the Nick Ashford and Valerie Simpson song "Bring Back The Sunshine", which was retitled "Dark Side of the World" when Diana Ross later released a version of the song. The final Velvelettes single release (after an internal label change to Motown's Soul subsidiary) was "These Things Will Keep Me Loving You", which made number 43 on the US R&B Charts. Carolyn Gill began dating Richard Street, lead singer of The Monitors, who later joined The Temptations. Sandra Tilley joined Martha Reeves and the Vandellas, replacing Rosalind Ashford. Gill married Street in November 1969 and he dissuaded her from continuing with the Velvelettes (preferring that his wife care for the home) so Gill decided to break up the group and it disbanded. Tilley retired from show business in the late 1970s, got married, and died in 1983 from a brain aneurysm.

In 1971, "These Things Will Keep Me Loving You" became a hit in the United Kingdom, number 34 on the UK Singles Chart. Despite the new success, the group did not reunite until 1984, following a rare concert appearance by the cousins and the sisters at the request of Barbee-McNeal. Together the Gill sisters and Barbee cousins then went on to re-record their original hits and some new songs for the album One Door Closes for Motorcity Records. The group continues to tour today.

Three decades after the group left Motown, the company released a CD, The Very Best of the Velvelettes, featuring 15 tracks, including four previously unreleased selections. A 19-track CD The Velvelettes: The Best Of was released in the UK in 2001. The 2004 The Velvelettes: The Motown Anthology is a double album with 48 tracks.

In 2006, the Velvelettes contributed to the double CD Masters of Funk, Soul and Blues Present a Soulful Tale of Two Cities. Lamont Dozier, Freda Payne, George Clinton and Bobby Taylor recorded remakes of songs from Philadelphia International Records. The Velvelettes sang "One Of a Kind Love Affair", originally recorded by the Spinners. The other CD featured Jean Carne, Bunny Sigler and Jimmy Ellis.

In 2007, the Velvelettes provided backing vocals on 7 of the 11 tracks for Danish pop duo Junior Senior's second album Hey Hey My My Yo Yo, including a rap by Bertha Barbee-McNeal on "Itch U Can't Skratch".

Founding member Bertha Barbee-McNeal died of colon cancer in hospice in Kalamazoo, Michigan, on December 15, 2022, at the age of 82.

Singles

 * Their eponymous album was never completed and never saw release
 * – Chart positions from Cashbox magazine

Albums

 * 1966: The Velvelettes (not completed, scheduled for V.I.P. 401)
 * 1990: One Door Closes (MOTCLP 43)

Compilations

 * 1999: The Very Best of the Velvelettes
 * 2001: The Velvelettes: The Best Of
 * 2004: The Velvelettes: The Motown Anthology

title: The Velvelettes


text:
User talk:Jellypuzzle

''Thank you for taking the time to visit my talk page. If you wish to leave me a message, please post it at the bottom of the list as that makes much more sense to me. Please also use headlines when starting new talk topics (click here to do this) and sign your name by using the signature button (scribble next to the crossed out W) or writing ~. Feel free to write to me about anything. As long as it isn't a personal attack I'll be very happy to recieve it. Many apologies if you are coming here to tell me I have done something wrong, I probably didn't understand or mean to do it. No comments for a long time may have me talking to myself''

EP
Noticed your edit to EP. Just thought I'd let you know that piping and excess wikilinks are not generally done on dabs. Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) has more info, and I'm happy to answer any questions.--Commander Keane 11:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that if the article title EP (music CD) is confusing then maybe it needs to be changed but I have no idea, music is music to me.--Commander Keane 12:09, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * (Note to self - I still don't agree with this but it's silly to argue) Jellypuzzle 00:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Shoe Polish
I'm sure you didn't mean to, but please watch your edits. You added a picture of a penis back to the featured article in your "reversion of vandalism". — The Hooded Man ♃♂ 19:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * (Note to self - That was very silly). Jellypuzzle 00:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Re: my vandalism "revert" on Shoe polish, I was multitasking (well, attempting to) as the phone rang and clicked the wrong thing. Very dumb.  Will be more careful in the future.  Thanks for the message, if it wasn't being watched more closely or wasn't so obvious that could have been bad. Jellypuzzle 19:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC) [''This reply was originally posted on User talk:HoodedMan and has been relocated in an effort to keep discussions unfragmented.]
 * No problem at all! I can certainly understand problems caused by multitasking.  ;)  Just thought I'd let you know.  — The Hooded Man ♃♂ 23:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Firefox userbox
I've created a text only version of the User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Firefox template at User:Blast san/userboxes/User browser:Firefox text and added it to your user page, I hope you don't mind. I've also made a request for said template to be protected so hopefully no one can edit it. — Ian Moody (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Frog Eyes
Thanks for the help. The album info box was a mess. I meant to fix that the other day but got distracted.

re: This Heat "2006 reissue (!)"
I got it in the weekly e-mail from Other Music. The existing CDs have been fetching high prices! - Gyrofrog (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikics template
Hi Jellypuzzle! I've just created a new template to indicate English Wikipedia users who also contribute to the Czech Wikipedia.

Template:User wikics

Feel free to add it to your userboxes if you like it (and if you actually contribute). Happy Easter. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 22:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the template on Talk:The Pirate Bay
Thank you for the intro template on Talk:The Pirate Bay. Now that I see it, it's obvious. (And I'm aware of the irony that I don't use the recommended ~ myself..)--magetoo 17:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

hello
iam new to all this but most importantly i say hi!!

Okkkk
I know this is off ur suject but wut is with Cthulhu? My boyfrend is OBSSESED!

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Buck65.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Buck65.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Fluxbloglogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Fluxbloglogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 19:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Fieryfurnacesgallowsbirdsbark.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fieryfurnacesgallowsbirdsbark.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Fieryfurnacesep.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fieryfurnacesep.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Fieryfurnacesblueberryboat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fieryfurnacesblueberryboat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mogwairockaction.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mogwairockaction.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  20:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ys cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ys cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Whatwouldthecommunitythink.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Whatwouldthecommunitythink.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Git (album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Git (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Does not meet wikipedia guideline for wp:notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 03:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Wikifox.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wikifox.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Wonky Pop
Your PROD got deleted so I listed the article at 'Articles for Deletion'. If you want to add your 2 cents there, by all means...   SIS   12:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I was going to go through that process myself eventually.  It was a bit harsh just putting the template in.  Jellypuzzle | Talk 12:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Drownedinsoundlogo.png)
 Thanks for uploading File:Drownedinsoundlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  07:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Jellypuzzle! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Eleanor Friedberger -

Orphaned non-free image File:Spotifyscreenshot.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Spotifyscreenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of The Independent Scrutineer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Independent Scrutineer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Independent Scrutineer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 05:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Theindependentscrutineer.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Theindependentscrutineer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jimorourkeinsignificance.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Jimorourkeinsignificance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fieryfurnacesrmc.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fieryfurnacesrmc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Yarn and Glue for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yarn and Glue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yarn and Glue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JBchrch  talk  16:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yarnandgluenewsom.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Yarnandgluenewsom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wildlikechildren.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wildlikechildren.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jellypuzzle


text:
Lovat Scouts

The Lovat Scouts was a British Army unit first formed during the Second Boer War as a Scottish Highland yeomanry regiment. They were the first known military unit to wear a ghillie suit, and were renowned for their elite reconnaissance capabilities. In 1916, the Lovat Scouts formally became the British Army's first sniper unit, then known as "sharpshooters". The regiment served in the First World War and Second World War.

Formation and early history
The regiment was formed in January 1900 for service in the Second Boer War by Simon Fraser, 14th Lord Lovat, Chief of Clan Fraser of Lovat, as the Lovat Scouts. Recruited initially from gamekeepers and professional stalkers on Highland estates, the unit was commanded by the Hon. Andrew David Murray from his appointment by Lord Lovat in February 1900 until killed in action September 1901. After his death Lord Lovat, who had hitherto served as second-in-command of the regiment, took command himself (aged 29), and in such a role he remained till the end of the war. Well practiced in the arts of marksmanship, fieldcraft and military tactics, they were also phenomenal woodsmen "always ready to tempt fate", but also practitioners of discretion: "He who shoots and runs away, lives to shoot another day." The Lovat Scouts have the distinction of being the first military unit to wear a Ghillie suit.

Lovat Scouts were attached to the Black Watch, but were disbanded in July 1901 while two companies (the 113th and 114th) were formed for the second contingent of the Imperial Yeomanry (IY) and another (178th) for the third contingent. After the end of the Second Boer War in June 1902, the companies returned to the United Kingdom on SS Tintagel Castle two months later, and were disbanded. The unit was reformed the following year, consisting of two regiments, titled the 1st and 2nd Lovat Scouts. From these Scouts a sharpshooter unit was formed and formally become the British Army's first sniper unit. The regiment was disbanded in August 1902 but reformed as Lovat's Scouts Imperial Yeomanry in March 1903. It reverted to the Lovat's Scouts Yeomanry when the yeomanry regiments transferred to the Territorial Force in April 1908. The regiment was based at Croyard Road near Beauly at this time (since demolished).

First World War
In accordance with the Territorial and Reserve Forces Act 1907 (7 Edw. 7, c.9) which brought the Territorial Force into being, the TF was intended to be a home defence force for service during wartime and members could not be compelled to serve outside the country. However, on the outbreak of war on 4 August 1914, many members volunteered for Imperial Service. Therefore, TF units were split in August and September 1914 into 1st Line (liable for overseas service) and 2nd Line (home service for those unable or unwilling to serve overseas) units. Later, a 3rd Line was formed to act as a reserve, providing trained replacements for the 1st and 2nd Line regiments.

1/1st and 1/2nd Lovat Scouts
The 1/1st Lovat's Scouts Yeomanry landed in Gallipoli in September 1915. It was evacuated to Egypt in December 1915 and then converted into 10th (Lovat's Scouts) Battalion, the Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders in September 1916. It landed at Salonika and under the command of 82nd Brigade in the 27th Division in October 1916 and then became Line of Communication troops in France in June 1918.

2/1st and 2/2nd Lovat Scouts
The 2nd Line regiments were formed in 1914 and in January 1915 joined the 2/1st Highland Mounted Brigade. On 31 March 1916, the remaining Mounted Brigades were ordered to be numbered in a single sequence; the brigade became the 1st Mounted Brigade and joined 1st Mounted Division in Norfolk.

In July 1916, the 1st Mounted Division was reorganised as the 1st Cyclist Division and the regiments were converted to cyclist units in the 1st Cyclist Brigade of the division at Somerleyton near Lowestoft. In November 1916, the 1st Cyclist Division was broken up and the regiments were merged to form 1st (Lovat's Scouts) Yeomanry Cyclist Regiment, still in the 1st Cyclist Brigade. In March 1917, they resumed their identities as 2/1st Lovat's Scouts and 2/2nd Lovat's Scouts at Gorleston. By July 1917, the regiments had moved to Beccles, where they remained until the end of the war, still in 1st Cyclist Brigade.

3/1st and 3/2nd Lovat Scouts
The 3rd Line regiments were raised in July 1915 at Beauly and affiliated to a Reserve Cavalry Regiment at Aldershot. They provided drafts to 1st and 2nd Line regiments. In June 1916, they moved to Perth. The regiments were disbanded in January 1917 with personnel transferring to the 2nd Line units or to the 3rd (Reserve) Battalion of the Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders at Invergordon.

"Sharpshooters"
In 1916, the regiment formed detachments known as "sharpshooters", which were used for observation and sniping work on the Western Front.

Between the wars
Post-war, a commission was set up to consider the shape of the Territorial Force from 1 October 1921. The experience of the First World War made it clear that there was a surplus of cavalry. The commission decided that only the 14 most senior regiments were to be retained as cavalry, the others being variously converted to armoured cars or artillery. However, two Scottish Yeomanry regiments remained mounted as 'Scouts': the Scottish Horse and the Lovat Scouts (reduced to a single regiment).

Second World War
From May 1940 to June 1942, the Lovat Scouts provided the garrison in the Faroe Islands, protecting against the feared German invasion. The regiment at this time was under the command of Lt.-Col. Sir Donald Cameron of Lochiel, 26th Chief of Clan Cameron. After stationing in Scotland, the regiment was sent to Canada in December 1943 for specialist ski and mountain training. They sailed on the Mauretania for 11 days. They pulled into Grand Central Station, New York and then travelled on the Canadian Pacific Railway eventually arriving in Jasper, Alberta after five days. The training, which took place in remote areas of Jasper National Park, started with basic ski training. The emphasis was on cross country work with the type of load that would have to be carried in action e.g. sleeping bag, rations for two or more days, and a rifle. This was followed by survival instruction—what to do and what not to do to exist and function in very cold conditions e.g. by digging snow holes in which to sleep, or erecting simple shelters from the virgin pine and spruce forests. After this stage, there was instruction and practice in ascents on snow and ice, use of ice axe, crampons etc.

Typically, men would spend three or four weeks at a mountain base, in the vicinity of Mount Edith Cavell, or in the Tonquin Valley—all within the 4200 square miles of Jasper National Park. In that time, squadrons would practice their survival work in expeditions usually lasting about two or three days at a time, with the men sleeping in snow holes. For the remainder of the time, they were billeted in canvas marquees, each accommodating about 25 men, with a large wood-burning stove in the middle that was kept on night and day with logs sawn from the fallen or naturally dead trees in the area. At the end of the three or four weeks on Mount Edith Cavell or in the Tonquin Valley, the men would come down for a few days' rest and recreation in the chalets in Jasper. Alberta was then a "dry" province, so there was no alcohol. When a few days' leave was given, most made the 500-mile journey to Vancouver or Halifax, Nova Scotia or Windsor, Ontario, where they were entertained by the locals, many of whom were Scotch expatriates or descendants. The men were also able to get limitless supplies of liquor from over the U.S. border in Montana!

By late April, spring was well on the way, and the regiment embarked by train for a journey to Halifax. Their intended embarkation there was delayed when some fell ill with scarlet fever, but training continued with work on river crossing, whether or not the individual soldiers could swim, and route marches. Eventually, all embarked on the converted liner Andes on convoy, which had an uneventful crossing, being in mid-Atlantic on 6 June, the day of the Normandy landings. On landing at Liverpool, the regiment entrained for Aberdeen Kittybrewster railway station, where it spent about three weeks, including spells of home leave.

As a consequence of its training in Jasper, the Scouts was sent to Italy, arriving in Naples in July 1944, to take their part in the relatively fluid situation following the fall of Monte Cassino. The regiment took part in the remainder of the Italian campaign, and the German surrender in early May 1945.

Post-War
At the end of the war in Europe, the regiment drove north, through the Brenner Pass, into Austria and Bavaria, where they sought out senior members of the Nazi party and SS personnel. In early 1946, the regiment moved to Greece by plane, landing in Salonika in support of the Greek Civil Power during the communist insurgency.

Upon the reconstitution of the Territorial Army on 1 January 1947, the regiment was reduced to a squadron (C (Lovat Scouts) Squadron) of The Scottish Horse, part of the Royal Armoured Corps. However, on 1 January 1949 it was transferred to the Royal Artillery as 677 (Lovat Scouts) Mountain Regiment, RA , with headquarters at Inverness. On 22 May the following year one battery became independent as 850 (Lovat Scouts) Mountain Battery then on 30 September the rest of the regiment amalgamated with 532 Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment at Falkirk and 540 Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment at Inverness, the combined unit taking the title 532 (Lovat Scouts) Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment, RA. 850 Mountain Bty was disbanded on 5 April 1954 and the personnel absorbed back into 532 LAA Regiment, which was redesignated 540 (Lovat Scouts) LAA Regiment on 4 November that year. On 31 October 1956 it absorbed 412 (Highland) (Mixed) Coast Regiment with no change of title.

The regiment underwent further changes when the TA was reorganised on 1 May 1961:
 * B Troop at Alness and Tain, and the detachment at Gare Loch, were absorbed into 11th Battalion, Seaforth Highlanders
 * A Troop at Benbecula, C Troop at Newtonmore, and the detachment at Fort William, were absorbed into 4th Battalion, Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders
 * The rest of 540 LAA Regiment absorbed 861 (Orkney and Zetland) Independent LAA Battery, which became Q (Orkney & Zetland) Bty at Lerwick, Shetland; it dropped 'LAA' from the regimental title on 4 October that year, and was designated 'Light Air Defence' from 18 March 1964.

When the TA was reduced into the Territorial and Army Volunteer Reserve (TAVR) after the defence cuts of 1967, the unit became A (The Lovat Scouts) Company, in 3rd (Territorial) Battalion, Queen's Own Highlanders (Seaforth and Camerons), which became part of 2nd Battalion 51st Highland Volunteers in March 1969.

The unit was re-organised as two separate platoons in two different companies of 51st Highland Volunteers in 1981 and as two separate platoons of 3rd (Volunteer) Battalion, The Highlanders (Seaforth, Gordons and Camerons) in 1995. The lineage was maintained by the Orkney Independent Cadet Battery (RA) Lovat Scouts from 2012 until 1 January 2018 when the unit amalgamated with Shetland Independent Cadet Battery (RA) forming Orkney and Shetland Battery of 1 Highlanders Battalion Army Cadet Force where they are still allowed to wear the head dress and tartan but now are a battery within 1 Highlanders ACF.

Music
The Lovat Scouts is a lively Scottish quickstep and strathspey, written in the bagpipe idiom by James Scott Skinner.

Memorials
There is a memorial to the Lovat Scouts in the town square of Beauly, Inverness.

title: Lovat Scouts