text:
User talk:Green Tentacle

Orphaned non-free image File:Football Conference.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Football Conference.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

McLeish
Hello. I agree the linked article doesn't now say "BBC Sport understands", but it did yesterday. BBC websites have an irritating habit of updating their stories at the same URL, which not infrequently causes confusion. I'm not going to edit war about the sentence you added, but it looks like the only thing in dispute is the meaning of "accepting" a resignation. If it means "and he can go forthwith without observing his contractual obligations", then certainly they haven't accepted it. If I tender my resignation, I don't expect to leave that day and go and work for the company next door, I have to work a notice period or do whatever else it says in my contract. That's what they're expecting of McLeish: that he doesn't go off to the Villa or elsewhere without coming up with the compensation specified in his contract. The linked article says (before they change it again :-) "Birmingham have begun the process of looking for a new manager after appearing to accept that Alex McLeish will leave St Andrew's." McLeish is probably still under contract to Birmingham, but he certainly isn't their manager. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

 * While I agree that McLeish will certainly never actually 'manage' Birmingham City ever again (as has been the case right since he sent his infamous email), his is still – officially at least – the club's manager. The club needs to accept his resignation or change his role (neither of which have happened – yet) before this situation changes. He should be listed as manager until that ceases to be his job title (including any notice period).

 * Given the article currently says their manager is Martin O'Neill (or attempts to: the wikicode is malformed), I've changed it back to Alex McLeish, as he remains the club's official manager. I suppose the issue could be elaborated on in the main text, but I'll leave that to others. - Green Tentacle (talk) 14:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CIELogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:CIELogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Derby County.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Derby County.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:12, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Netscape throbber 2.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Netscape throbber 2.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:SPC ECO - 3-D.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:SPC ECO - 3-D.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cinema de Lux.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Cinema de Lux.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Football League logo 1988-2004.png
 Thanks for uploading File:The Football League logo 1988-2004.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Bloonstdfan360  / talk / contribs 18:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WJEC.png
 Thanks for uploading File:WJEC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Football League Logo
Are you able to post a high resolution/vector version of the original 1888 Football League logo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexolive71 (talk • contribs) 11:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Sorry, five years passed between your message and me logging in. I'm afraid I don't have a high resolution version of the original Football League logo. I think I just found the one I uploaded way back on a website (no need for a fair use rationale 15 years ago). The only other copies of it online seem to have been taken from Wikipedia before its deletion. It's a shame that the logo and the following one from 1888–2004 have been deleted, given the 2004–2016 logo has been spared. - Green Tentacle (talk) 22:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Football League logo until 1988.png
Thank you for uploading File:The Football League logo until 1988.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:14, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Football Conference.png
Thanks for uploading File:Football Conference.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BBFC Uc 2002 onwards.png
Thanks for uploading File:BBFC Uc 2002 onwards.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Sheffield coat of arms.png
Thanks for uploading File:University of Sheffield coat of arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Sheffield logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:University of Sheffield logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:The Football League.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Football League.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * And, after its restoration at Deletion Review, I've renominated it at Files for discussion/2020 September 14. —Cryptic 00:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Derbyshire Children's Hospital

A tag has been placed on Derbyshire Children's Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 00:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:National Association for the Teaching of English (logo).gif
Thanks for uploading File:National Association for the Teaching of English (logo).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Teachers' trade unions in the United Kingdom
In the Teachers' trade unions in the United Kingdom, which you created, someone pointed out that the National Society for Education in Art and Design isn't listed there. Since I know next to nothing about education in the UK, perhaps you could add the relevant information to that page? Thanks! ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 20:40, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the question. To the best of my knowledge, NSEAD is a subject association, rather than a trade union, so isn't really in the scope of the article. – Green Tentacle (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Associated Examining Board (logo).png
Thanks for uploading File:Associated Examining Board (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OCR (Oxford, Cambridge and RSA Examinations) logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:OCR (Oxford, Cambridge and RSA Examinations) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scottish Qualfications Authority coat of arms.png
Thanks for uploading File:Scottish Qualfications Authority coat of arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Associated Examing Board coat of arms.png
Thanks for uploading File:Associated Examing Board coat of arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AEB-SEG logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:AEB-SEG logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nowhere album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nowhere album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eduqas logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Eduqas logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Chester coat of arms (fair use).png
Thanks for uploading File:University of Chester coat of arms (fair use).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SIMS.png
Thanks for uploading File:SIMS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Southern League.png
Thanks for uploading File:Southern League.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Digital 3&4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Green Tentacle


text:
User talk:Iandotcom

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have.  You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox.  When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines.  First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette.  Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame)  19:35, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

 * Welcome from me as well. Please be sure to write in complete sentences, and include at the very minimum one full sentence explaining the topic of the article when you start a new article. More tips can be found at the Manual of Style. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 20:41, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:ONCE-cupondiario.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ONCE-cupondiario.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 07:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Areva-advert.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Areva-advert.PNG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mark83 00:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Caprabo logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Caprabo logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Oncelogo new.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Oncelogo new.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Oncelogo_new.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Oncelogo_new.gif. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 12:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Oncelogo new.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oncelogo new.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 23:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Oncelogo new.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Oncelogo new.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eastbournecofeacademylogo.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Eastbournecofeacademylogo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Iandotcom


text:
Talk:De La Salle High School (Concord, California)

Books & Other Media on DLS
In addition to the, When the Game Stands Tall, there is at least one other book on DLS football, One Great Game by Don Wallace. There is also two movies, 1 (from 2004, directed by Tim O'Hara) and Perfect Effort (from 2007, directed by Stephen Lilly). I don't see any reason why the one book is listed while omitting the rest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SDNick484 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Cost
how much does it cost to attend? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billymac00 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Tuition and books for the 2009-2010 school year comes to $13,900. This does not include sports fees, lunch costs, "uniforms" (no denim (khakis or Dickies are recommended), collared shirts (Polos or sport shirts), belts, plus a dress outfit of dress pants, dress shoes, tie and belt for liturgy services. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.48.78.123 (talk) 17:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Article needs reliable sources
This article contains no outside sources, see WP:RS Tagging it; hopefully this will improve the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macuxi (talk • contribs) 21:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Principal's name
According to this directory, Christopher Brady is the principal. I notice that several other names have been entered as the principal, probably as hoaxes. Renee (talk) 03:12, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Alumni
Elvin Bishop did not attend De La Salle - he played a concert there in 1976 - other notables who played there that year were Journey and Earthquake. Brian Porier (class of 76 - Little Bill Graham) was a budding rock promoter who had some serious connections that year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.67.137 (talk) 16:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Removing Elvin Bishop from Alumni list
As noted above by someone else, Elvin Bishop did not attend De La Salle. Per the Elvin Bishop article in Wikipedia, he was born in 1942 and completed high school before DLS was founded in 1965. Publius3 (talk) 05:39, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on De La Salle High School (Concord, California). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150831071001/http://www.dlshs.org:80/admissions/tuition-fees/index.aspx to http://www.dlshs.org/admissions/tuition-fees/index.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012204502/http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1023961/index.htm to http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1023961/index.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lasalle.org/English/Mission/Statement/mims.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080702181303/http://www.dlshs.org:80/content/academics/ministry/ to http://www.dlshs.org/content/academics/ministry/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on De La Salle High School (Concord, California). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dlshs.org/admissions/tuition-fees/index.aspx
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dlshs.org/content/academics/ministry/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705033432/http://www.lasalle.org/English/english.php to http://www.lasalle.org/English/english.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on De La Salle High School (Concord, California). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090607113004/http://www.delasallesports.com/Teams/Football_-_2008/FB2008-Polls/fb2008-polls.html to http://www.delasallesports.com/Teams/Football_-_2008/FB2008-Polls/fb2008-polls.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928044047/http://www.dlshsalumni.org/s/86/index.aspx?sid=86&gid=1&pgid=61 to http://www.dlshsalumni.org/s/86/index.aspx?sid=86&gid=1&pgid=61

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:KatmaiAD

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have.  You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox.  When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines.  First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette.  Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame)  19:38, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:KatmaiAD


text:
User talk:Leodalord

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have.  You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox.  When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines.  First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette.  Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame)  19:38, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:David.amess-mark.thomas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:David.amess-mark.thomas.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 07:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:David.amess-mark.thomas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:David.amess-mark.thomas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leodalord


text:
Pen Pals

Penpals, people who regularly write to each other.

Pen Pals or penpals may also refer to:

Music

 * Pen Pals (band), a indie folk band from the United States
 * "Penpals", by Sloan from Twice Removed
 * "Penpals", a track from Jazz Suite Inspired by Dylan Thomas's "Under Milk Wood"

Other uses

 * "Pen Pals" (Star Trek: The Next Generation), a second season episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation first broadcast on May 1, 1989
 * Pen Pals, a 1992 film starring Bai Ling
 * Penpal (novel), a 2012 self-published horror/thriller novel by Dathan Auerbach
 * "Pen Pals" (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends), a 2007 cartoon short from Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends

title: Pen Pals


text: Category:Militant Zionist groups

title: Category:Militant Zionist groups


text:
Talk:Ananda Marga survey

The purpose of the survey pages is to show the different details of the Hindu organisations in a uniform way without having to read through a whole article when looking for certain information. The purpose of the original page on Ananda Marga is different and it can elaborate on things which are and things which are not part of the survey page..Andriesb 19:42, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ananda Marga survey


text:
Website builder

Website builders are tools that typically allow the construction of websites without manual code editing. They fall into two categories:
 * Online proprietary tools provided by web hosting service companies. These are typically intended for service users to build their own website. Some services allow the site owner to use alternative tools (commercial or open-source) — the more complex of these may also be described as content management systems.
 * Application software that runs on a personal computing device used to create and edit the pages of a web site and then publish these pages on any host. (These are often considered to be "website design software", rather than "website builders".)

History
The first website, manually written in HTML, was created on August 6, 1991.

Over time, software was created to help design web pages. For example, Microsoft released FrontPage in November 1995.

By 1998, Dreamweaver had been established as the industry leader; however, some have criticized the quality of the code produced by such software as being overblown and reliant on HTML tables. As the industry moved towards W3C standards, Dreamweaver and others were criticized for not being compliant. Compliance has improved over time, but many professionals still prefer to write optimized markup by hand.

Open source tools were typically developed to the standards and made fewer exceptions for the then-dominant Internet Explorer's deviations from the standards.

The W3C started Amaya in 1996 to showcase Web technologies in a fully featured Web client. This was to provide a framework that integrated many W3C technologies in a single, consistent environment. Amaya started as an HTML and CSS editor and now supports XML, XHTML, MathML, and SVG.

GeoCities was one of the first more modern site builders that didn't require any technical skills. Five years after its launch in 1994 Yahoo! purchased it for $3.6 billion. After becoming obsolescent, it was shut down in April 2009.

title: Website builder


text:
Talk:De La Salle High School

Merged
This list has been merged into Lasallian educational institutions, for the reasons given on its talk page. Before adding a new educational institution to this list, please ensure that it is not affiliated with the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools; if it is, then it belongs to the Lasallian educational institutions article. In order to avoid duplication of content, only non-Lasallian education institutions should be listed on this page. Ayla 10:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:De La Salle High School


text:
Talk:Tulku

"reincarnate custodian"
With all due respect to those who's faith supports such claims, Wikipedia shouldn't be asserting reincarnation as fact. I've not edited the lede directly, as I'm not sure how best to word it, but this clearly needs revising. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I see that the lede has been extensively revised, making the above comment moot. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Merge from Western tulku
The primary reason not to separate Western tulkus from the tulku page is that Western tulkus are an integral part of the tulku system. They are part of the continuation of Tibetan tulku lineage into which they were recognized. The tulku article will be providing a summary of the history of each tulku lineage. These Westerners will be covered at part of their respective tulku lineages. To split the article is to take the Western tulkus out of the context of their lineages.

The second reason not to split the article is that Western tulkus are not like Plastic shamans. Western tulkus are made by high Tibetan lamas. While there is criticism about these Western tulkus, the Westerners are not at fault. The fault is in the system itself and the criticism, at least from the Tibetan side, is not about the shortcomings of the Western tulkus, but rather accrues to the high lamas who made them. Splitting the article seems to be an attempt to isolate these lamas from any criticism of their actions by making the article solely about the perceived faults of the Westerners themselves, out of context of the system and individual decisions of lamas to recognize them.

Western lamas and their faults simply reflect the faults of the system and the lamas who made them. This is best presented in a unified article. Skyerise (talk) 12:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 * What here is actually relevant to a merge discussion? WP:RSs reflect a distinction between Western tulku and Tibetan tulku and the former article is long enough on its own. It doesn't matter how you feel about Western tulku or whether they or their masters are at fault. We aren't in the business of reflecting how Western tulku are innocent, we're in the business of building an encyclopedia.
 * Also, you unilaterally close a merge discussion if a significant amount of time has passed and there has been no discussion, i.e. if the nominator (i.e. you) has abandoned the merge proposal and instead nominated the article for deletion. That might be different now since you've finally opened the discussion, but throwing a bunch of tags on a page you don't like (and then failing to defend them) is just disruptive editing. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 16:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * "Significant amount of time is generally taken as 30 days, like any RfC. Skyerise (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Policy specifically states it is usually seven days, not 30 days. In any case clearly abandoning the merge proposal to pursue an AfD proposal instead is good reason to unilaterally close the former. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 18:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Neutrality
Large swathes of the page are being unilaterally merged (without consensus or discussion, with opposition to beat a dead horse) from Western tulku. In particular the Tulku section is being duplicated with irrelevant information on criticism levied against individual Tibetan tulku, not criticism levied against the entire tulku system. This is, quite obviously, intended to give false balance as the author in question has made quite a stink about how Western lamas and their faults simply reflect the faults of [...] the lamas who made them which one can see on the above comment and the AfD proposal on Western tulku.

This should either be replaced by criticism of the tulku system in general, or placed in (a) different section(s)...although the particular personal controversy surrounding individual tulku lineage holders is not really relevant to the tulku system as a whole. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 18:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 * Yes, it is. The validity of individual tulku recognitions have been questioned since at least the 4th Dalai Lama. These questionings have always been the result of unexpected behavior, regardless as to whether the tulku was of Tibetan or other descent. These objections to individual tulkus have always included or led to criticism as to whether the system actually works. The lamas who recognized the tulkus are also criticized for these situations. Perhaps read more widely? Skyerise (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Then why doesn't the prose reflect that? MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 18:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Why don't you read the sources? Skyerise (talk) 19:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That's irrelevant to how they're being displayed and used on the page. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 19:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I guess you didn't notice that I explicitly pointed to where they are used as examples in a lengthy discussion of problems with the tulku system at Open Buddhism? Skyerise (talk) 19:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That's a single sentence followed by several unrelated claims. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 19:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The cited article is specifically about failures of the tulku system and gives several well-known examples. These examples are no different than the criticism of Seagal's behavior. They are not "unrelated", the relation that these acts were committed by recognized tulkus is the very theme of the article. Skyerise (talk) 19:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Then why isn't that reflected in the article? MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 19:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It is explicitly mentioned. Perhaps you should read it again, more slowly? Skyerise (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The tulku system has been criticized since its inception. Criticism has also been directed against individual tulkus, including both Tibetan and Western tulkus says nothing about how individual criticism reflects the failure of the tulku system, just that individual tulkus (even the Tibetan ones, guys!) have been criticized. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 19:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, you're only reading the first paragraph. Stop wasting my time. Skyerise (talk) 19:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Note to self
Don't forget to add the Zhabdrung Rinpoches, as they are mentioned in the lead. Skyerise (talk) 11:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Tulku


text:
Talk:Humanistic Judaism

unitarian monotheism
From what I've been able to piece together, Judaism tends to teach unitarian monotheism. This makes it rather hard for me to understand Humanistic Judaism.

I've done quite a bit of research lately on unitarian monotheism.

Gringo300 19:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Unitarian belief is often humanistic in outlook. However, Humanistic Judaism is non-theistic. Yet, the religion celebrates beliefs that our consistent with the philosophy of Humanistic Jews.

--Ron

Number of aderents
Article states 50,000 adherents worldwide. The New York Times in 2007 cited 40,000 (in obituary of founder Rabbi Sherwin Wine). Since the 50,000 figure is unsourced, it would appear to be high. -- Elaine —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.192.125 (talk) 23:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

separation debated opinions from mutually agreed facts
I cleaned up some opinions, that were included in the body of the text. The author of that edit expressed the view that Humanistic Judaism was not Judaism because "Judaism is theistic." That misses the point that Humanistic Judaism is founded in opposition to that very principle. Humanistic Judaism may clash with older ideas of Judaism, but the question of "is it Judaism?" is debatable. Indeed, from the perspective of Humanistic Judaism, the question cannot have an immutable answer.

Maybe there should be a Criticism heading to cover the points of debate between Humanistic and other forms of Judaism. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Optional field (talk • contribs) 21:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 one external links on Humanistic Judaism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709054548/http://www.shj.org/NewsAbortionFunding.html to http://www.shj.org/NewsAbortionFunding.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130725135714/http://www.shj.org/ConscienceClauses.html to http://www.shj.org/ConscienceClauses.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928161629/http://www.shj.org/WomensEqualityDay.html to http://www.shj.org/WomensEqualityDay.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131010054121/http://www.shj.org/MarriageEquality.htm to http://www.shj.org/MarriageEquality.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130725123301/http://www.shj.org/Homophobic%20Bullying.html to http://www.shj.org/Homophobic%20Bullying.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Humanistic Judaism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131001234821/http://iishj.org/index.html to http://iishj.org/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928164758/http://www.shj.org/shjbios.htm to http://www.shj.org/shjbios.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160512020657/http://www.jmwc.org/Women/womend.html to http://www.jmwc.org/Women/womend.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Humanistic Judaism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040305165842/http://www.shj.org/Choice.htm to http://www.shj.org/Choice.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050819114028/http://lcshj.org/ to http://www.lcshj.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Humanistic Judaism


text:
Personal shopper

A personal shopper is a person who helps others shop by giving advice and making suggestions. They are often employed by department stores and boutiques, although some are freelance or work exclusively online. Their focus is usually on clothes, although the number of non-clothing stores – such as furniture retailers – that offer personal shopping services is on the rise.

There are no formal educational requirements to become a personal shopper, though most outlets recommend related retail experience.

A personal shopper is typically employed by the store itself, which means that payment for the service is not required. Other stores will charge a small fee to use their personal shoppers and the amenities that come along with the service. Personal shoppers can also be known as fashion stylists, shop assistants, or sales assistants.

Some personal shoppers operate without affiliation on a freelance basis, including private client event styling and closet organizing. Outside of agencies, personal shoppers can be found on auction websites such as eBay where they auction their services to obtain customized items such as men and women's clothing collections.

title: Personal shopper