text:
User talk:Josebove

Welcome!
Hello, Josebove, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  00:34, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Josebove


text:
User talk:Jarwulf

Welcome!
Hello, Jarwulf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  00:34, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Anon users
Anonymous users are not problem, problem is lack of tools to enforce quality control on Wikipedia. Pavel Vozenilek 19:58, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

kim possible episode numbers ...
It seems as though the episode numbers (upper left corner) are currently sort of random. I was thinking they probably ought to be numbered from 1-65 like they are here Does this sound correct to you? -- ProveIt (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I've been playing around with the idea of numbering by airdate...but you can relabel them if you wish...

Jarwulf 20:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * My plan is to use the same numbers as in the kp-tome ... -- ProveIt (talk) 03:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:TwotoTutor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TwotoTutor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 11:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * none of the license tags I leave with TwotoTutor.jpg seem to be showing up. Will try again tonight
 * Jarwulf 17:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I tagged it as a tv-screenshot, I think that is probably correct. You can go to the image page Image:TwotoTutor.jpg and click edit to see how you do the tag. I'm not sure what you were trying before, maybe uploading it again? You can change the tag by editing the page (it's actually very similar to any other wikipedia page). If you have any questions let me know :) - cohesion  t 18:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:CarTrouble.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CarTrouble.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 09:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:TheGoldenYears.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheGoldenYears.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 09:11, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:JobUnfair.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JobUnfair.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 09:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:VirTuRon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:VirTuRon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 09:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:TheFearlessFerret.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheFearlessFerret.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 09:18, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Exchange.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Exchange.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 09:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kaavya_Viswanathan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kaavya_Viswanathan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Framegrabbing
I have a question for you, if you could help. I was wondering if you could tell me how to framegrab. If it helps, I have a dvd-player on my computer and the default program for dvd playing is PowerDVD. If you can help that would be great, if you can't that is ok too. -- Will Mak  050389  04:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't seem to have that version of powerDVD but I will try to find one of those freeware programs somnewhere. Thanks for your time. -- Will Mak  050389  14:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006
I'm trying to track down the bill number for this and I'm not finding anything...was it ever even introduced in Congress? Thanks. Postdlf 18:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * All mention of the bill seems to have completely dropped off the radar after april, as far as I know it hasn't been introduced. However I did find that the Intellectual Property Enhanced Criminal Enforcement Act of 2006, HR 5921 covers much of the same ground and no one seems to be aware of this one, aside from the old fogies in congress who write all this stuff up Jarwulf 00:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Would you support deleting it? I don't see a need to document bills that never left the drafting table.  I started List of intellectual property legislation pending in the United States Congress so I've been trying to organize these.  Postdlf 00:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If we know its dead I wouldn't mind, but since everyone's forgotten about it we'll have to check to see if it didn't just morph into another bill or will actually be coming up for a vote in the distant future. Jarwulf 00:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

cutting vs thrusting
I just remembered that talk pages aren't really supposed to be use for general subject discussion, but only for article discussion. Here is a response to your latest question.

Well, it isn't to say that cutting weapons were totally abolished at all. Swords like Messers remained popular in northern Europe, and the Renaissance saw the introduction of the famed Zweihanders, Katzbalgers, and Broadswords such as the Schiavona, all heavily cutting based weapons. On the battlefield, cutting weapons were extremely effective, especially the cavalry sabre, as you mentioned, in part because the amount of armour began to decline after the onset of effective firearms, meaning that warswords no longer had such a problematic time with reaching their intended target (it is also a important to understand that sword-central warfare was falling somewhat out of style at this point, leading up to the use of pike squares and firearm formations). These warswords could not easily defend against rapiers in the civilian duels because of the inherent speed of rapier combat, and the rapiers lost their effectiveness when in constrained battle conditions (from my understanding). Because of these differences, rapiers were left to use against rapiers (most of the time) in unarmoured civilian duels, while the cutting warswords went on in military (and occasional civilian) use until after firearms became the prevalent means of attack. -- Xiliquiern 02:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Kim Possible
Hey Jarwulf! Since season 4 of KP started, edits to the KP pages have increased dramatically. If you have time, please look over the pages and make any corrections. Hope to see you around! =)  Jumping cheese   Cont @ct 21:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ccclogo.png removed from Template:California Community College System
An image or media file, Image:Ccclogo.png, has been removed from Template:California Community College System because it was licensed as fair use. Wikipedia's fair use policy states that fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms to templates. For more information, see Wikipedia's fair use policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of fair use images. Thank you for your cooperation.

Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:UCTemplateLogo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:UCTemplateLogo.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 11:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:CSUChannel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CSUChannel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:CSUChico.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CSUChico.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:CSUDominguezHillsR.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CSUDominguezHillsR.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:CalStateTemplateLogo.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CalStateTemplateLogo.PNG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CalStateTemplateLogo.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CalStateTemplateLogo.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:HiddenTalent.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:HiddenTalent.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:JobUnfair.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:JobUnfair.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NakedGenius.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:NakedGenius.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RewritingHistory.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:RewritingHistory.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RonMillionaire.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:RonMillionaire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TripleS.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:TripleS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:KPRecapAdventuresInRufusSitting.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapAdventuresInRufusSitting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:KPRecapShowdownAtTheCrookedD.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapShowdownAtTheCrookedD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:California Community College System
Template:California Community College System has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. szyslak 10:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Episode pages
Many helpful episode articles are disappearing! Angie Y. 02:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:GoTeamGo.jpg
Hi, thak you for uploading Image:GoTeamGo.jpg, however there is a minor problem with the image summary, it would be appreciated if you could add details of the source media (DVD/film/Video) it was captured from along with the timecode of the relevant frame, Thanks ShakespeareFan00 20:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:GrudgeMatch.jpg
Hi, thak you for uploading Image:GrudgeMatch.jpg, however there is a minor problem with the image summary, it would be appreciated if you could add details of the source media (DVD/film/Video) from which it was captured such as title,volume code, distributor, along with the time code of the relevant frame (if available), Thanks. ShakespeareFan00 08:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:AVeryPossibleChristmas.jpg
Hi, thak you for uploading Image:AVeryPossibleChristmas.jpg, however there is a minor problem with the image summary, it would be appreciated if you could add details of the source media (DVD/film/Video) from which it was captured such as title,volume code, distributor, along with the time code of the relevant frame (if available), Thanks.

Fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapKimitationNation.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KPRecapKimitationNation.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapOctober31st.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KPRecapOctober31st.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapPainKingvsCleopatra.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KPRecapPainKingvsCleopatra.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Partners.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Partners.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapAttackofBebes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapAttackofBebes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapDayofSnowmen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapDayofSnowmen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapDimensionTwist.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapDimensionTwist.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapGorillaFist.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapGorillaFist.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapPainKingvsCleopatra.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapPainKingvsCleopatra.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KPRecapRoyalPain.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapRoyalPain.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KPRecapAttackofBebes.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:KPRecapAttackofBebes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ReturnToCampWannaweep.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:ReturnToCampWannaweep.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dirtcookie.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Dirtcookie.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Exchange.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Exchange.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GrudgeMatch.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GrudgeMatch.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dirtcookie.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Dirtcookie.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:32, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheGoldenYears.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TheGoldenYears.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thargor Orlando (talk) 16:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

UCSF project
Hi! I am currently revamping the project. Created lots of pages and added a lot of content, but there is so much to do. I saw that in the past you have contributed, so I wanted to invite you to collaborate once more. Thanks! Eccekevin (talk) 21:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2018
- MrX 🖋 10:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful

 * Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes ( ~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not alter other's comments.
 * "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We merely summarize reliable sources without elaboration or interpretation.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are.

Reformulated:

 * "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.  In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence.  In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.
 * Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims.
 * We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.

Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children).

You may also want to read User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV. We at Wikipedia are highbrow (snobby), heavily biased for the academia. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor) are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to recently deceased or living people
Doug Weller talk 14:43, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Attacks on other editors are violations of our civility policy and thus of the American Politics discretionary sanctions
I won't sanction you this time, however. Please don't do it again. Doug Weller talk 14:44, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Wow, what an honor. I never imagined I myself, or a tiny little edit would warrant personal attention from so high up, let alone from Wiki's resident Henry Jones Jr. But I guess, participation being what it is these days you'd be surprised who you'll find in positions and what they'll occupy themselves with.

 * My specific edit was precisely about the construction of the page and not a general discussion of the subject itself. I was helpfully attempting to save User:Humanophage time and other users the headache of dealing with a pointless edit war. As for it being a so called 'attack' on other editors, Wikipedia is rife with such 'attacks' and assumptions of perceived bias, and call outs to the point where it is a Wikipedia institution, I'm surprised an ArbCom member, let alone one who appears to enjoy being an active participant in similar controversies so often, is unaware of it.

 * Assuming fellow editors are racists both on the subject and within the comments

 * Call outs and personal attacks, throwing around the word 'butthurt'

 * assumptions of NeoNazism and calling out personal bias of editors

 * These "attacks" are not only limited to talk pages and discussion but are also found within articles. As it is apparently Wikipedia's policy to allow editors to systematically engage in politicized pumping of article ledes. So groups they disfavor (ie perceived right leaning organizations and people) have the beginning of their articles frontloaded with negative sounding phrases and their more controversial aspects to give readers a negative initial impression in comparison to their opposition. Compared to the above and other examples that wikipedia does little or nothing about :(and these are mild since I'm too lazy to dig) my edit was quite innocuous, it didn't even personally call out or 'attack' anyone specifically. If you're afraid that Wiki political articles will rightfully be widely seen as biased and low quality to the point where you feel you have to censor even discussions about it, I'm afraid that cat has left that barn years ago. --Jarwulf (talk) 04:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

 * You are doing that again at Jorm's talkapge, while using the talkpage at Talk:Proud Boys for un-actionable expressions of personal opinions that are at odds with reliable sources.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Have you looked at his talkpage? In that place alone he regularly mocks other users. Calls them names. Mocks them for their 'feefees'. Posts replies that are meant to be taken as dismissive over and over again. I merely said this behavior (seemed) unprofessional when it intersected with me. If you can explain why the former is okay but what I did is completely beyond the pale. I thank you Jarwulf (talk) 02:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your edit was properly removed as a forum-style post at a talkpage that gets a lot of that kind of time-wasting traffic. We don't have much patience for that. You don't get to retaliate.   Acroterion   (talk)   02:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Cool story, bro Jarwulf (talk) 03:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Important notice
- Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Jarwulf


text:
Talk:Frankie Vaughan

Judy
Your article reads '"Judy," did make the charts briefly and at a very low spot;' in Wikipedia it says it was a 1950's one-hit-wonder. These are contradicting statements. One must be in error.

 * A #22 'hit' in both the UK and U.S. Actually, in the UK it was the b-side to "Wonderful Things". Article now amended accordingly.

 * Derek R Bullamore (talk) 10:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Frankie Vaughan - politics
I recall that Vaughan assisted Barbara Castle (MP for BLACKBURN) in the EEC Vote No campaign, 1975. Or a in a general election? No real mention of his politics. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.47.4.89 (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC).

Release date
In this article the release date of the song Istanbul (not Constantinople) has been given as 1953 and in the article of the song it has been given as 1954. (Too bad the 1954 editor is an an ambiguous user.) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:46, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

 * One of those cases where the song was released one year, but did not enter the charts until the next. 1953 release date, but entered the UK Singles Chart in January 1954.  I'll leave it to you to effect the necessary alteration(s).  Cheers,

 * Derek R Bullamore (talk) 12:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/lea/77469.htm and http://www.allmusic.com/artist/frankie-vaughan-mn0000906603/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Frankie Vaughan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140219113216/http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/lea/77469.htm to http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/lea/77469.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140219113216/http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/lea/77469.htm to http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/lea/77469.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710134022/http://www.discoogle.com/wiki/Vaughan,_Frankie_Discography to http://www.discoogle.com/wiki/Vaughan%2C_Frankie_Discography

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:56, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Son David Sye
The article states "sons, singer and yoga elder David Sye (b.1961)". If this is the same David Abelson who was at school with me (same class), he must have been born around 1954-56. Is this worth checking? If so, how and/or where? Muleiolenimi (talk) 09:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Frankie Vaughan


text:
Talk:ROM (MUD)

VfD results
This article was nominated for deletion. The result was no consensus. For details, please see Votes for deletion/ROM (MUD). -- BD2412 talk 00:35, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

Major early ROM 2 varient
Mad ROM one of the more significant offshoots of the ROM II code base is still running. It's notable in that it was splintered off of the old cie-2.uoregon.edu trunk, but hosted on Zump's computer for a while along side a more mature ROM II branch. There are a lot of modifications, but a number of them are cosmetic, the actual base is very close to ROM II. Zump even forwarded the DNS mad.rom.org to the new machine. I think it's interesting in that it's a kind of fossil, or time capsule. The game play hasn't really changed since the late 80s. The nature of this mud might begin to change as the new Implimentors while working slowly are using code versioning, and are quite a bit more sophisticated in their apporach to the code base than has typically been the case in the past. It seems that this older version should have some sort of mention, though I'm not confident in the form it should take.--Insancipitory (talk) 10:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

So I added a link to the page and it got removed, the mud community is small as it is now and finding the base stock rom software is a pain.

I put the link us not as advertising in anyway nor to get rank in google since I block all spiders from indexing my entire site as it is.

70.236.40.238 (talk) 14:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Nice to see Rivers of MUD documented. I was an active user in the mid 1990s. I believe my alias would have been Phoetus or Ragefetus. Lots of fun with an early online hack-and-slash community. Jmccorm (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Setting better redirect.
See Talk:Merc (MUD) - DikuMUD is a better redirect as the parent codebase than a specific Diku derivative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etmoonshade (talk • contribs) 15:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:ROM (MUD)


text:
Trevor Griffiths

Trevor Griffiths (4 April 1935 – 29 March 2024) was an English dramatist.

Early life
Born in Ancoats, Manchester and brought up as a Roman Catholic by his mother, Annie, a bus conductor and father, Ernest, who worked in a factory. He attended St. Bede's College before being accepted into Manchester University in 1952 to read English. He graduated in 1955. After a brief involvement with professional football and a year in national service, he became a teacher and then an education officer for the BBC.

1960s–1970s
Griffiths became chairman of the Manchester Left Club, and the editor of the Labour Party's Northern Voice newspaper. Gradually he tired of political journalism, began writing plays, and was eventually commissioned by Tony Garnett to provide a script for The Wednesday Play (BBC, 1964–70). The play, "The Love Maniac", was about a teacher, but even though Garnett took the commission with him when he moved to London Weekend Television and formed Kestrel Productions, it was never produced.

Buoyed by Garnett's enthusiasm and influenced by the Paris events of May 1968, he wrote Occupations, a stage play about the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci and the Fiat factory occupations of 1920s Italy. The play had been submitted to the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) as early as 1964, but had then been rejected as being "too controversial". Following its premiere in Manchester the previous year, the eventual RSC production in 1971 of Occupations, Griffiths first full-length stage play, was directed by Buzz Goodbody. Intending to affect "bourgeois theatre" with his viewpoint, Griffiths described his approach as being "committed to analysing Marxism and to condemn Stalinism without discrediting socialism in the eyes of the world".

The play soon brought him to the attention of Kenneth Tynan, the literary manager of the National Theatre Company who promptly commissioned Griffiths to write the play that became The Party. This critique of the British revolutionary left featured the National's artistic director Laurence Olivier in his last stage role as the Glaswegian Trotskyist John Tagg. Griffiths had by now begun to write television plays, such as "All Good Men" (Play for Today, BBC, 31 January 1974) and "Through the Night" (2 December 1975). Influenced by the experience of his wife, the latter is concerned with a woman's treatment for breast cancer. In between these two plays came "Absolute Beginners" (BBC, 19 April 1974), in the series Fall of Eagles, which presents a version of events in 1903 involving Lenin and Trotsky. He developed a series about parliamentary democracy, Bill Brand, which was first shown by ITV in the summer of 1976.

Despite his considerable success in the theatre, he said of his work as a television dramatist in 1976: "I simply cannot understand socialist playwrights who do not devote most of their time to television... [t]hat if for every Sweeney that went out, a Bill Brand went out, there would be a real struggle for the popular imagination... [a]nd people would be free to make liberating choices about where reality lies."

In the meantime, Griffiths had continued to write for the theatre with Comedians commissioned by the Nottingham Playhouse. The premiere production of the play was directed by Richard Eyre, then artistic director of the Nottingham theatre, and was first performed on 20 February 1975. Comedians is set in a Manchester night-school, where a group of budding comics gather for a final briefing before performing to an agent from London. The play is set in real time, i.e. as the real time is 7.27, the clock on the wall of the school room also says 7.27. It subsequently transferred to Broadway, and was later adapted for television by Eyre while he was responsible for Play for Today.

1980s
Griffiths' reputation at the time was such that Warren Beatty asked him to write a screenplay for a project about the US revolutionary John Reed, which eventually became the Oscar-winning film Reds (1981), but Griffiths departed from the project before the script was completed and estimated that he had written only 45% of the script for the finished film.

Griffiths continued to work in the theatre, gaining success with the touring production of Oi for England (ITV, 17 April 1982). His television play, Country (BBC, 20 October 1981), set just before the Labour victory at the 1945 general election is "a not wholly unsympathetic study of a Tory family". He wrote the television serial, The Last Place on Earth (ITV, 1985), and the screenplay for Fatherland (1986) for director Ken Loach. He created a screen adaptation in 1981 for D.H. Lawrence's novel Sons and Lovers and in 1990, Piano, a stage version of a 1977 film itself based on Anton Chekov's play, Platonov.

1990s–2000s
Griffiths's Food for Ravens (BBC, 15 November 1997), was commissioned to mark the 100th anniversary of Aneurin Bevan's birth, but at one point the BBC decided not to network the play, and instead restrict it to Wales. Only a newspaper campaign led by Griffiths and the leading actor Brian Cox caused the BBC to relent, and it was finally shown in a late-night slot on BBC2.

In November 2008 Griffiths participated in a discussion on "The Writer and Revolution" with the World Socialist Web Site's arts editor David Walsh at the University of Manchester. In 2009 he completed his last play, A New World: A Life of Thomas Paine.

Griffiths participated in the Bush Theatre's 2011 project Sixty-Six Books, for which he wrote a piece based on the book of Habakkuk from the King James Bible.

Personal life and death
In 1960, Griffiths married Janice Stansfield; the couple had three children and were married until her death in an aviation accident in Cuba in 1977. Griffiths married Gill Cliff in 1992. He lived in Boston Spa.

Griffiths died from heart failure at his home on 29 March 2024, six days before his 89th birthday.

title: Trevor Griffiths


text: File:Poets and Madmen.jpg

title: File:Poets and Madmen.jpg


text:
Bodo Illgner

Bodo Illgner (born 7 April 1967) is a German former professional footballer who played as a goalkeeper. During his career he played for 1. FC Köln and Real Madrid, and helped West Germany to the 1990 World Cup, where he became the first goalkeeper to keep a clean sheet in a World Cup final.

Club career
Born in Koblenz, Illgner was a product of 1. FC Köln's youth system, and made his debut in the Bundesliga on 22 February 1986 at not yet 19, in a 3–1 away loss against Bayern Munich. From the 1987–88 season onwards, he became the club's undisputed starter – as successor of Harald Schumacher in both 1. FC Köln and the Germany national team – being voted as Best European Goalkeeper in 1991.

On 30 August 1996, already having started the campaign with Köln, Illgner was signed by Real Madrid, and played 40 La Liga matches in his first year to help the capital side to the national championship conquest. In the following he lost his place to Santiago Cañizares, but regained it in time to play in the final of the UEFA Champions League against Juventus FC (1–0 win).

In 1999–2000, Illgner was succeeded by 18-year-old Iker Casillas, after which he retired from football altogether.

In April 2013, he was named by Marca as a member of the "Best foreign eleven in Real Madrid's history".

International career
On 23 September 1987, Illgner made his debut for the West Germany national team in a 1–0 friendly home win against Denmark, and went on to back Eike Immel during UEFA Euro 1988. At the 1990 FIFA World Cup he, by now the country's first-choice, was in exceptional form, and commanded the backline which consisted of the experienced Klaus Augenthaler, Andreas Brehme, Thomas Berthold, Guido Buchwald and Jürgen Kohler (with Matthias Sammer taking Augenthaler's place at Euro 1992); in the semi-final, he saved a Stuart Pearce shot in the penalty shootout against England, and his team would overcome Argentina in the deciding match, where he would keep a clean sheet in the 1–0 success.

Overall, Illgner appeared 54 times for his country, and also played at the 1994 World Cup, surprisingly retiring after the quarter-final loss against Bulgaria although he was only 27.

Post-playing career
Illgner later went on to work as a pundit for Sky Deutschland and English language broadcasts of beIN Sport.

Honours
Real Madrid
 * La Liga: 1996–97
 * Supercopa de España: 1997
 * UEFA Champions League: 1997–98, 1999–2000
 * Intercontinental Cup: 1998

Germany
 * FIFA World Cup: 1990
 * UEFA European Under-16 Championship: 1984

Individual
 * German Goalkeeper of the Year: 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992
 * Best European Goalkeeper: 1991
 * kicker Bundesliga Team of the Season: 1994–95

title: Bodo Illgner


text:
The Driller Killer

The Driller Killer is a 1979 black comedy slasher film directed by Abel Ferrara and starring Ferrara (credited as Jimmy Laine), Carolyn Marz, Baybi Day, and Harry Schultz. The plot concerns Reno Miller, a struggling artist in New York City, turning insane from stress and killing derelicts with a power drill.

When the film was released on video cassette in 1982, its graphic packaging drew complaints which landed the release on a list of "video nasties" that were banned in the United Kingdom under the Video Recordings Act 1984. An edited version was later granted an 18 certificate and released in 1999, and a full uncut version was approved by the BBFC in November 2002. On 10 June 2010 it was re-released as video on demand (VOD).

The film is now in the public domain.

Plot
Artist Reno Miller and his girlfriend Carol enter a Catholic church and approach his estranged derelict father. The derelict seizes Reno's hand, causing him and Carol to flee from the church. Unknown to Reno, his father slipped him a piece of paper. The father requests a meeting with Reno. Reno denies knowing the homeless man.

Later, at his apartment, Reno receives an electricity bill and a phone bill, both of which, along with his monthly apartment rental fee, Reno cannot pay. He shares the apartment with Carol, a former flight attendant, and her drug-addicted lesbian lover, Pamela. The apartment is located in a derelict-filled neighborhood in Union Square. Reno visits Dalton, an art gallery owner, and announces that he is currently painting a masterpiece. Reno asks for a week's extension and a $500 loan to cover the rent. However, Dalton refuses, saying that he has already lent enough money to Reno. However, if Reno finishes a satisfactory painting in one week, Dalton will buy it for the agreed amount.

The following day, No Wave band the Roosters begin practicing their music in a nearby apartment, which makes Reno unnerved and frustrated. At 2:00 in the morning, Reno becomes agitated by the music while painting. After having a vision of his own image saturated in blood, Reno goes out for a walk. He sees an elderly homeless man sleeping in an alley, seizes him, and begins ranting. Reno ducks into the alley with the man, where they see teenage gang members chasing another homeless person. When the gang members are gone from sight, Reno drops the man to the ground and walks away, vowing that he will not end up like a derelict.

The next day, Reno complains about the Roosters to their landlord. However, the landlord refuses to act since the music does not bother him. He demands the rent money and gives Reno a skinned rabbit for dinner. Reno takes the rabbit home, repeatedly stabbing it during the preparation. During a reprieve from the music, Reno hears voices calling his name and has a vision of Carol with her eyes gouged out.

That night, Reno leaves his apartment and heads outside armed with a power drill connected to a portable battery pack. He discovers a homeless man inside an abandoned building and kills him. The following evening, Reno, Carol, and Pamela see Tony Coca-Cola and the Roosters at a nightclub. As the Roosters play, Reno becomes irritated by the music and crowd and leaves while Carol and Pamela dance and kiss.

Reno returns to his apartment, grabs his drill, and goes out on a killing spree. Throughout the night, Reno kills homeless people all over the city before returning home to sleep.

Later on, Tony visits Reno's apartment to ask Reno to paint a portrait of him. In exchange, Tony agrees to Reno's demand of $500 to cover his overdue rent. As Reno paints, Tony poses by playing his guitar and kissing Pamela. An upset transient man in a nearby alley is later killed by Reno. Afterward, Reno completes his painting, then wakes and notifies Pamela and Carol.

The next day, Reno and Carol show the painting to Dalton, who leaves after declaring it "unacceptable." Carol yells at Reno for sitting with a blank facial expression, which results in her leaving Reno for her ex-husband, Stephen, the next morning. That evening, Reno calls Dalton and invites him to see another painting. When Dalton arrives as the Roosters are practicing, a dressed-up Reno kills him with his drill. After visiting the Roosters, Pamela returns to the apartment where, upon the discovery of Dalton's body inside, she flees into the hallway before Reno grabs her.

Across town, Carol is back with Stephen at his apartment. She takes a shower while Stephen prepares tea. Reno enters the apartment, kills Stephen, and then hides his body behind a kitchen counter. Exiting from her shower, Carol walks to the bedroom where Reno is hiding underneath the bed covers. She turns off the lights, gets into bed, and then tells Stephen to "come here."

Production

The Driller Killer is a low-budget, independent feature, with a cast of unknown actors, produced by Ferrara's own Navaron Films company 1977–78 filmed on 16mm film and utilised Ferrara's Union Square apartment and adjacent streets as locations. It features many of the elements that became trademarks of Ferrara's later films including Catholic iconography, lesbian scenes, gritty urban locations filmed at night, an eclectic soundtrack combining punk rock and Bach, scenes of extreme violence and a religious theme of redemption, salvation and damnation. The punk rock band in the film reflects contemporary New York punk bands such as the New York Dolls and Television.

In the Driller Killer trailer, Reno is heard to say a line from a scene that does not appear in the finished movie: "It's just a window, Dalton."

As a final footnote in the film's history, when Arrow Films was preparing the film for re-release (the edition came out in November 2016), they discovered that the print they had was five minutes longer than any previous release on the film. They contacted Ferrara, who confirmed that it was a pre-release version, and that he had intentionally removed the footage prior to the release of the theatrical version. Arrow obtained permission to include this version as an extra in their release. The additional five minutes are all in the first half of the film and appear at seven points, including a shot of a Goodyear blimp lasting just a few seconds, a brief lesbian shower scene, and an argument scene lasting a full two-and-a-half minutes. Most of the new footage relates to the characters' development and backstory.

Censorship
The film was released theatrically in America without controversy in 1979. In the United Kingdom, however, the reaction to the video release was very different. In 1982, the UK distributors of Driller Killer, Vipco (Video Instant Picture Company) took out full-page advertisements in a number of movie magazines showing the video's violently explicit cover, depicting a man being drilled through the forehead by the Driller Killer. The tagline for the advertising and video box was: "There are those who kill violently!"

The advertising resulted in a large number of complaints to the Advertising Standards Agency, and opposition to the film from the press and elsewhere; however, it seems that very few of the complainants ever saw the film but based their opinion on the poster and title.

The film was lumped together with other "video nasties" released at the time and a vociferous campaign was launched by the press to ban them all. Driller Killer was added to the list of banned UK films on 4 July 1983, just a year after its release date. According to Mike Bor, the Principal Examiner at the British Board of Film Classification, The Driller Killer was almost single-handedly responsible for the Video Recordings Act 1984" under which it and others of the "video nasties" released at the time were banned in the U.K. According to Brad Stevens, author of a biography on Abel Ferrara, the banning of the film was "almost entirely due to the cover of the video". The film was classified R 18+ in Australia by the Australian Classification Board and released uncut on home video on April 29, 1985. It was released on DVD twice in the country: first by Umbrella Entertainment and again on August 9, 2013, when it was re-rated MA 15+.

The film was not officially released uncut in the UK until 2002.

Reception and legacy
Reviewers had pointed out that the film was not as violent as the original VHS cover suggested and is more of a psychodrama. The Driller Killer has a 64% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 14 reviews; the average rating is 6.06/10.

In 2015, video game developer Puppet Combo created The Power Drill Massacre, a title loosely based on The Driller Killer. The game shares the antagonist's name with the film and uses similar synthesiser noises during the chase moments.

Remake plans
In 2007, a remake of the original film was reported to be made by British film maker Andrew Jones. This new version of the film was to feature many unusual cameos and an original musical score. The remake would have moved the setting from New York to London and starred David Hess. Andrew Jones contacted Baybi Day to help co-produce and have a small acting role in the remake of Driller Killer. The title of the remake was designated Driller Killer Redux. The project came to a halt after a financial deal between the executive producers and the two people who held the rights to the original film could not be reached.

A microbudget British remake was released in 2012 named Driller Killer E2. In 2020 independent filmmaker Matt Jaissle produced and directed a second remake entitled Detroit Driller Killer. A third remake by Rob Oldfield is in development.

title: The Driller Killer


text:
Template:Romanian language

{{Documentation|content=

title: Template:Romanian language


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frim

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 16:59, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Frim
Delete apparent neologism. It doesn't matter how I Google for this, I can't see any results that appear to confirm the existence of the word. And no, it shouldn't be redirect to (please be red) From because that'd be a dicdef. -Splash 00:38, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep Google certainly does not have all the words of the language. I'm sure that there are many words in the Oxford English Dictionary that one would not find in a Google search. Many words have a conversation only beginning and later break out into the Google searchable world. Unsigned comment by anon IP 24.20.76.42. Author of the article.-Splash 00:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with Splash. FreplySpang (talk) 00:46, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I am happy to see the article deleted so long as you can answer this question- what do you call a frim?? Are you suggesting that there is no word at all for that sort of thing?? I would also like to note that neither Splash nor FreplySpang are Hollywood TV writers. A lot you two know about sitcoms, with your noses in philosophy books or political science articles all day long. Have you ever been to a Hollywood pool party??? Well, then: You wouldn't know.
 * In response to your challenge I will take what I hope is not flaimbait at its word and suggest comedic misunderstanding, the classic miscommunication or it's more verbose brother getting the wires crossed. And what about that old favorite, dramatic irony? Sure, perhaps they don't have the flair or brevity of "frim," but what of that ignoble day, thousands of years in the future, when we've run out of four letter words and there is a more important concept than this that needs rapid communicaion. It is that day that I will raise my tequila and celebrate what I believe will be the outcome of this VfD. Sirmob 03:55, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The need for a word does not prove that the word exists. Delete. --JimmyTheWig 16:26, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete There is wiktionary for dictionarydefinitions, and WP is not a neologism or slang guide (WP:WIN) drini ☎ 01:06, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. Presumably these Hollywood TV writers would write the word into a drama or sitcome if the word was that common in those circles. This appears not to have happened. Apart from this, it would have to convince us that it wouldn't be a dictdef. Capitalistroadster 01:27, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, we've heard from the word police, now let's hear from the people. What concerns me is the slippery slope that we are on. Sure, a child word, just a few years old and getting used to life, like "frim" is easy to attack. The gang of bullies has gathered around this tender child, knocked her down and are ready to try to kick her to death. I say "NO." Let us unfurl the banner, raise the roof beam high, light my candle, break out the tequila. Where will it stop. One day "frim" is got rid of, next day perhaps another newish word like "spam" used to mean unwanted Email will be axed. Then day by day the nitpicking, jack booted word police will get rid of more and more words on one pretext or another until we are reduced to trying to communicate with a few guttural utterances. Imagine scientists, poets, philosphers trying to communicate with "arrrghh" and "aye aye." A new dark ages will be ushered in made worse, and perhaps prolonged by the lights of perverted science. Let us, the DEFENDERS OF LANGUAGE, therefore conduct ourselves so that if we exist for a thousand years, historians will look back and say, "this was their finest hour." I would also like to point out that I was not the one who put the "definitions" section in the comedy article. If it is forbidden to discuss word meanings in Wikipedia, then the whole "definitions" section should be deleted.
 * Somewhere deep in my soul I do wish I could say wictionary, but I cannot, so my suggestion to the most determined author is to save the wikitext and fight this battle himself where it has the slightest chance of survival, if he feels he truly must. As for Wikipedia, dicdef, delete Sirmob 03:55, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, neologism plus unfunny clownish antics on VfD. Dcarrano 04:24, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * There is no "strong delete" option. In fact, you can only delete something, you can't do it strongly or weakly. Just shows what an absence of intellect you are working with that you would write something like that. So sad.
 * You have, naturally, studied carefully the Guide to Votes for Deletion which gives meaning to both 'strong' and 'weak' votes. And you no doubt did that before making your comment. Of course, you are right to think that such comments advance your cause, and will persuade everybody so addressed to vote in your favour. -Splash 13:39, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a site for advocating neologisms. —Tokek 05:10, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism. Cnwb 07:28, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable, neologism, dictionary definition, any which on its own would suffice.   Morwen - Talk 08:44, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism. JamesBurns 09:55, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Merriam-Webster cannot be expected to keep up with the language. jacobmc 12:41, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as a "frim". The Forest Research Institute of Malaysia is FRIM. Wikipedia is not a dictionary and Wikipedia is not a soapbox for promoting invented words. Delete. Uncle G 16:14, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Transwiki to wiktionary: There is such a thing as frim, but it is not what this definition claims; it's listed in the OED as an obscure and now unused word. I have replaced the article text with the proper definition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nandesuka (talk • contribs) 18:18, 18 July 2005 UTC
 * There's no such thing (or indeed person, concept, place, or event) as a frim, though. Your new definition is for an adjective, note, not a noun.  Please don't put an article in Wikipedia and then immediately vote to transwiki it to Wiktionary.  By doing that you have made more work for other editors to do, in manually transwikiing the article, entirely unnecessarily. Please write your dictionary articles in Wiktionary directly, especially in cases when that is where you want them to be. Uncle G 22:42, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Transwiki' to wiktionary. The current version of the article is just a dicdef. For the previous versio, i would want citations of its use, plus soem reson to think such use was notabable and the article ever likely to be more than a dicdef of recent slang or jargon. If the use in the "comminc misunderstandign conversation" sense can be established, that should go to wiktionary too. DES 20:10, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg (talk) 23:34, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Move it to wiktionary if it were real, but it's not. There's no words even beginning with f-r-i-m as far as I can find, nevermind 'frim' itself. MrD 01:03, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Connel MacKenzie 04:40, July 19, 2005 (UTC)  (Another visiting Wiktionary sysop.)
 * Delete: NN, neologism. --Ragib 06:28, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * If one of this article's solemn defenders can provide any evidence that this word ever existed, may he please put it forward now. I've been through the Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary and the OED, and I can't find any traces of "frim" whatsoever. This is obviously a hoax, especially when you consider that the author of this article, an anonymous editor with IP 24.20.76.42, placed a link to frim on the comedy article. See the diff. My vote is strong delete. Binadot 02:50, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I am not a "solemn defender" of the original, stupid definition, but you didn't go through the OED carefully enough. from the OED online (subscription required):

frim (a) Obs. exc. dial. Forms: 1 freme, 4 frym, 6-7 frimm(e, (7 frime, 8 frem), 7- frim. [OE. frme:prehistoric *frami-, cognate with fram adj., forward, advanced, bold.] a. Vigorous, flourishing; after OE. only in physical sense (or fig. of this), luxuriant in growth, plump, full-fleshed.     b. Abundant in sap, juicy, full of moisture; rarely in unfavourable sense. Also of sap: Abundant, rich.     c. Easily melting, soluble, fusible.   Beowulf 1932 Mod ryo wæ fremu folces cwen. c1000 Cædmon's Gen. 2328 (Gr.) Ic am magorince mine sylle godcunde gife gastes  mihtum, freondsped fremum. 13.. E.E. Allit. P. A. 1078, & twelue syez on er ay beren ful frym [fruits]. c1420 Liber Cocorum (1862)  5 Cast on e powder of hare I wot; Hit is so frym, ren hyt wylle An malt as sugur. 1589 Mar Martine 3 Abbots were fat and friers frimme.  1600 HOLLAND Livy VI. vii. (1609) 221 Those nations that by long peace were most frimme and lustie [ex integerrimis]. 1601 Pliny I. 348 Many are so frim and free of milke, that [etc.]. Ibid. 463 The timber also is more frim and soft. 1604 DRAYTON Owle 5 The frim sap..From the full root, doth swell the plenteous rynde. 1613 Poly-olb. xiii, My frim and lusty flank Her bravery then displays. 1622 Ibid. xxvii, Her deare daughter Dale, which her frim Cheeke doth lay To her cleere mothers Breast. 1657 AUSTEN Fruit Trees I. 136 Seede plants are commonly more frim straight and handsome, then wood-stocks. 1669 WORLIDGE Syst. Agric. (1681) 224 If May and June prove wet Months, it causes a Frimm and Frothy Grass. 1712 MORTON Northamptonshire 51 The fremmest..that is the richest feeding land we have. 1736 W. ELLIS New Exp. Husb. 54 The shorter and younger the grass, the frimmer is the Sap. 1747 HOOSON Miner's Dict. Ojb, Potter's Ore..is so frim and fusible that a great deal of this sort is sold. 1750 W. ELLIS Mod. Husb. IV. i. 151 A frim growing time. 1888 Sheffield Gloss. s.v., This lettuce is very frim. Hence frimness. c1714 T. BATES in Athenæum No. 1982 (1865) 535/3 The frimness of the grass. 1736 W. ELLIS New Exp. Husb. 64 We..sow a Mixture of Clover..to allay its Frimness.
 * I therefore maintain that my transwiki the corrected definition position is the correct one. Nandesuka 13:27, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Since I also have no doubt that someone will claim that the OED doesn't say what it says (does anyone besides me have a subscription? I can't be the only one), here's a freely available that provides evidence that I'm not just fabricating the OED text.  Here's the early form of the word used in Beowulf (search for "fremu", in context means "excellent" or "lusty" or "vibrant").  I 100% agree that the original definition was idiotic, and should have been replaced.  But given that the people that posted it somehow managed to stumble on to a real word that isn't in the wiktionary, I think it would be irresponsible of us not to correct the error and transwiki it to wiktionary. Nandesuka 13:40, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frim


text:
Talk:Edgar Breau

Untitled
If you knew anything about Breau's politics, his being active in the Family Coalition Party would not seem so improbable. Despite his music being admittedly quite radical, his political views tend towards a sort of right wing Catholicism along the lines of Mel Gibson or Pat Buchanan.

 * I'm (somewhat) aware of Breau's philosophical background, but I still think the fact of a Canadian punk pioneer running for the FCP qualifies as "improbable".

 * If you really want to change the wording, though ... CJCurrie 02:20, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Edgar Breau


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DarkSyde

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. – ABCD✉ 02:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

DarkSyde
blogger-cruft. EvilPhoenix talk 00:41, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete drini ☎ 01:05, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, blogger with no sign of notability. Dcarrano 04:26, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bloggist vanity. Cnwb 07:26, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable blogger vanity. JamesBurns 09:56, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity listing. Duckorange 15:12, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg (talk) 23:40, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.