text:
List of railway lines in China

The following is a list of conventional lines of rail transport in China. For the high-speed network, see List of high-speed railway lines in China.

Beijing-Harbin Corridor

 * Jingqin Railway; Beijing-Qinhuangdao 京秦线
 * Jingshan Railway; Beijing-Shanhaiguan 京山线
 * Shenshan Railway; Shenyang-Shanhaiguan 沈山线
 * Qinshen Passenger Railway; Qinhuangdao-Shenyang 秦沈客运专线
 * Changda Railway; Changchun-Dalian 长大线
 * Changbin Railway; Changchun-Harbin 长滨线
 * Binzhou Railway; Harbin-Manzhouli 滨洲线

In passenger rail service, Jingshan Railway, Shenshan Railway, Changda Railway|Changda Railway, Changchun-Shenyang Portion and Changbin Railway are collectively called Jingha Railway (Beijing-Harbin).

East Coast

 * Changda Railway; Changchun-Dalian 长大线, Shenyang-Dalian Portion (沈大段)
 * Yanda Railway Ferry 烟大铁路轮渡
 * Lanyan Railway; Lancun-Yantai 蓝烟线
 * Jiaoxin Railway; Jiaozhou-Xinyi 胶新线
 * Xinyi–Changxing railway; Xinyi-Changxing 新长线
 * Xuancheng–Hangzhou railway Xuancheng-Hangzhou宣杭线, Hangzhou-Changxing Portion (杭长段)
 * Xiaoshan–Ningbo railway; Xiaoshan-Ningbo 萧甬线
 * Ningbo-Taizhou-Wenzhou Railway Ningbo-Wenzhou 甬台温铁路
 * Wenzhou–Fuzhou railway Wenzhou-Fuzhou 温福铁路
 * Fuzhou–Xiamen railway Fuzhou-Xiamen 福厦铁路
 * Yingtan–Xiamen railway; Yingtan-Xiamen 鹰厦线, Zhangping-Xiamen Portion (漳厦段)

Beijing-Shanghai Corridor

 * Jingshan Railway; Beijing-Shanhaiguan 京山线, Beijing-Tianjin Portion (京津段)
 * Jingpu Railway; Tianjin-Pukou 津浦线
 * Huning Railway; Shanghai-Nanjing 沪宁线

Jingshan Railway Beijing-tianjin Portion, Jingpu Railway and Huning Railway are collectively called Jinghu Railway(京沪线) in passenger rail service.

Beijing-Kowloon Corridor

 * Jingjiu Railway 京九线 / 京九鐵路; Beijing-Shenzhen (and onward into Kowloon, Hong Kong)
 * Guangshen Railway; Guangzhou-Shenzhen 广深铁路

Jingjiu Railway uses the same line as Guangmeishan Railway between Longchuan and Dongguan. It also uses the same line as Guangshen Railway between Dongguan and Shenzhen. It then crosses the border and follows the East Rail line to Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Beijing-Guangzhou Corridor

 * Jingguang Railway; Beijing-Guangzhou 京广线

Datong-Zhanjiang Corridor

 * Beitongpu Railway; Datong-Fenglingdu 北同蒲线
 * Taijiao Railway; Taiyuan-Jiaozuo 太焦线
 * Jiaoliu Railway; Jiaozuo-Liuzhou 焦柳线
 * Shichang Railway; Shimenxian-Changsha 石长线
 * Xianggui Railway; Hengyang-Pingxiang 湘桂线
 * Yuehai Railway; Guangdong-Haikou粤海铁路

Baotou-Liuzhou Corridor

 * Shenmu–Yan'an railway神延铁路
 * Xi'an–Yan'an railway 西延铁路
 * Xi'an–Ankang railway 西康铁路

Baoji-Kunming Corridor

 * Baocheng Railway; Baoji-Chengdu 宝成铁路
 * Chengdu–Kunming Railway; Chengdu-Kunming 成昆铁路

Beijing-Lhasa

 * Fengtai–Shacheng railway; Fengtai-Shacheng 丰沙铁路
 * Beijing–Baotou railway; Beijing-Baotou 京包铁路
 * Baotou–Lanzhou railway; Baotou-Lanzhou 包兰铁路
 * Lanzhou–Qinghai railway; Lanzhou-Xining 兰青铁路
 * Qinghai–Tibet railway; Xining-Lhasa 青藏铁路

Eurasian Land Bridge

 * Longhai Railway; Lianyungang-Lanzhou 陇海铁路
 * Lanzhou–Xinjiang railway; Lanzhou-Xinjiang 兰新铁路
 * Northern Xinjiang Railway;Ürümqi-Alashankou (Alataw Pass)北疆铁路
 * The Second Ürümqi-Jinghe Railway (乌精二线)
 * Nanjing–Xi'an railway; Nanjing-Xi'an 宁西铁路

Yangtze River Valley

 * Nanjing–Qidong railway 宁启铁路
 * Nanjing–Tongling railway 宁铜铁路 (including Nanjing-Wuhu Railway 宁芜铁路)
 * Tongling–Jiujiang railway 铜九铁路
 * Wuhan–Jiujiang railway 武九铁路
 * Wuhan-Yichang Railway 汉宜铁路
 * Yichang–Wanzhou railway 宜万铁路

Shanghai-Kunming Railway (Hukun Line)

 * Shanghai–Hangzhou railway; Shanghai-Hangzhou 沪杭铁路
 * Zhegan Railway; Hangzhou-Zhuzhou 浙赣铁路
 * Xiangqian Railway; Zhuzhou-Guiyang 湘黔铁路
 * Shanghai–Kunming railway; Guiyang-Kunming 贵昆铁路

South Coast

 * Xiamen–Shenzhen railway Xiamen–Shenzhen 厦深铁路
 * Guangzhou–Meizhou–Shantou railway; Guangzhou–Meizhou–Shantou 广梅汕线
 * Guangzhou–Sanshui railway; Guangzhou–Sanshui 广三线
 * Guangzhou–Maoming railway; Sanshui–Longhua 三茂线
 * Hechun–Maoming railway; Hechun–Maoming 河茂线
 * Litang–Zhanjiang railway; Litang–Zhanjiang 黎湛线
 * Hainan eastern ring high-speed railway
 * Yuehai railway; Zhanjiang–Haikou 粤海铁路
 * Guangdong–Hainan railway, Guangzhou–Haikou (includes the Guangdong–Hainan Ferry)

Other inter-regional railways

 * Xinjiang–Tibet railway (proposed)
 * Huanghua–Dajiawa railway 黄大铁路 (freight only)

North

 * Beijing–Zhangjiakou railway; Beijing–Zhangjiakou 京张线
 * Beijing–Chengde railway; Beijing–Chengde 京承线
 * Chengde–Longhua railway; Chengde–Longhua 承隆线
 * Yeboshou–Chifeng railway; Yeboshou–Chifeng 叶赤线
 * Ningwu–Kelan railway 宁岢铁路
 * Handan–Changzhi railway 邯长铁路
 * Handan–Jinan railway 邯济铁路
 * Xinxiang–Yanzhou railway 新兖铁路
 * Yanzhou–Shijiusuo railway 兖石铁路
 * Zibo–Dongying railway 淄东铁路
 * Dongdu–Pingyi railway 东平铁路
 * Ciyao–Laiwu railway 磁莱铁路
 * Xindian–Taian railway 辛泰铁路
 * Yangpingguan–Ankang railway 阳安铁路
 * Yangquan–Dazhai railway 阳大铁路
 * Tianjin–Jizhou railway 津蓟铁路
 * Tangshan–Caofeidian railway
 * Jiexiu–Yangquanqu railway

Northeast

 * Beijing–Tongliao railway; Beijing–Tongliao 京通铁路
 * Jinzhou–Chengde railway; Jinzhou–Chengde 锦承线
 * Weizhangzi–Tashan railway; Weizhangzi–Tashan 魏塔线
 * Jining–Tongliao railway; Jining–Tongliao 集通线
 * Jinzhou–Nanpiao railway; Jinzhou–Nanpiao 南票线
 * Xinlitun–Yixian railway; Xinlitun–Yixian 新义线
 * Gaotaishan–Xinlitun railway; Gaotaishan–Xinlitun 高新线
 * Goubangzi–Tangwangshan railway;Goubangzi–Tangwangshan 沟海线
 * Yingkou–Dashiqiao railway; Yingkou–Dashiqiao 营口线
 * Zhoushuizi–Lushun railway; Zhoushuizi–Lushun旅顺线
 * Jinzhou–Chengzidan railway; Jinzhou–Chengzidan 金城线
 * Chengzidan–Zhuanghe railway; Chengzidan–Zhuanghe 城庄线
 * Qiqihar–Bei'an railway; Qiqihar–Bei'an 齐北铁路
 * Fuyu–Nenjiang railway; Fuyu–Nenjiang 富嫩铁路
 * Nenjiang–Greater Khingan Forest railway; Nenjiang–Greater Khingan Forest District 嫩林铁路
 * Tongliao–Ranghulu railway; Tongliao–Daqing 通让铁路
 * Baiyinhua–Xinqiu railway 巴新铁路 (freight only)
 * Xiangyangchuan–Hayudao railway 向阳川－哈鱼岛铁路

East and Southeast

 * Anhui–Jiangxi railway Wuhu–Guixi 皖赣铁路
 * Hengfeng–Nanping railway Hengfeng–Nanping 横南铁路
 * Nanping–Fuzhou railway Nanping (Waiyang Station)–Fuzhou 外福铁路
 * Zhangping–Quanzhou–Xiaocuo railway Zhangping–Quanzhou 漳泉肖铁路
 * Xiangtang–Putian railway Nanchang–Fuzhou, Putian 向莆铁路
 * Zhangping–Longyan railway; Zhangping–Longyan 漳龙铁路
 * Meikan railway; Meizhou–Kanshi 梅坎铁路
 * Longyan–Xiamen railway Longyan–Xiamen 龙厦铁路
 * Ganzhou–Longyan railway Ganzhou–Longyan 赣厦铁路
 * Jinhua–Wenzhou railway Jinhua–Wenzhou 金温铁路
 * Ganzhou–Shaoguan railway Ganzhou–Shaoguan 赣韶铁路
 * Quzhou–Ningde railway
 * Dezhou–Dajiawa railway Dezhou–Weifang 德大铁路 (freight only east of Dongying)
 * Dongying Port railway 东营港疏港铁路 (freight only)
 * Longkou–Yantai railway
 * Xiangtangxi–Le'an railway (freight only, partially abandoned)
 * Xingguo–Quanzhou railway (under construction)
 * Binhai Port railway (under construction)
 * Jinhua–Taizhou railway (under construction)

South Central

 * Jingmen–Shashi railway 荆沙铁路
 * Hankou–Danjiangkou railway 汉丹铁路
 * Huaihua–Shaoyang–Hengyang railway 怀邵衡铁路
 * Huizhou Port railway 惠州港铁路 (freight only)
 * Nansha Port railway 南沙港铁路

Southwest

 * Xiangyang–Chongqing railway; Xiangyang–Chongqing 襄渝铁路
 * Dazhou–Chengdu railway 达成铁路; Chengdu–Dazhou
 * Chengdu–Chongqing (Chengyu) railway; Chengdu–Chongqing 成渝铁路
 * Suining–Chongqing railway; 遂渝铁路
 * Yuli railway; Chongqing–Lichuan 渝利铁路
 * Chongqing–Huaihua railway; Chongqing–Huaihua 渝怀铁路
 * Sichuan–Guizhou railway; Chongqing–Guiyang 川黔铁路
 * Guizhou–Guangxi railway Guiyang–Liuzhou 黔桂铁路
 * Hunan–Guangxi railway Hengyang–Pingxiang 湘桂铁路
 * Nanning–Kunming railway; Nanning–Kunming 南昆铁路
 * Neijiang–Kunming railway; Neijiang–Kunming 内昆铁路
 * Yunnan–Vietnam railway; Kunming–Hanoi 昆河铁路
 * Guangtong–Dali railway; Guangtong Station–Dali 广大铁路
 * Dali–Lijiang railway; Dali–Lijiang 大丽铁路
 * Kunming–Yuxi railway; Kunming–Yuxi 昆玉铁路
 * Weishe–Hongguo railway; Weishe–Hongguo 威红铁路
 * Pan County West railway; Hongguo–Zhanyi 盘西铁路
 * Liupanshui–Baiguo railway; Liupanshui–Baiguo 水柏铁路
 * Yulin–Tieshangang railway; Yulin–Tieshangang 玉铁铁路
 * Wen'an–Machangping railway 瓮马铁路 (under construction)
 * Dali–Ruili railway 大瑞铁路 (under construction)

Northwest

 * Linhe–Ceke railway; Linhe–Ejin Banner 临策铁路
 * Jiayuguan–Ceke railway; Jiayuguan–Ejin Banner 嘉策铁路
 * Southern Xinjiang railway; Turpan–Kashgar 南疆铁路
 * Kashgar–Hotan railway; Kashgar–Hotan 喀和铁路
 * Jinghe–Yining–Khorgos railway; Jinghe–Yining–Khorgos 精伊霍铁路
 * Kuytun–Beitun railway; Kuytun–Beitun 奎北铁路
 * Ürümqi–Dzungaria railway; Ürümqi–Jiangjunmiao 乌准铁路
 * Hami–Lop Nur railway; Hami–Lop Nur 哈罗铁路
 * Hotan–Ruoqiang railway (under construction)
 * Tianshui–Longnan railway 天陇铁路 (under construction)

Coal transport railways

 * Datong–Qinhuangdao railway 大秦铁路
 * Ningwu–Jingle railway 宁静铁路
 * Shenhuang railway
 * Houma–Yueshan railway 侯月铁路
 * Xinxiang–Yueshan railway 新月铁路

Intra-city Metros

 * Urban rail transit in China
 * Rail transport in Hong Kong

Former railways

 * Woosung Road

International railways

 * China–Nepal railway
 * China–Pakistan railway
 * China–Laos railway
 * China–North Korea railway
 * Yiwu–London railway line
 * Chongqing–Xinjiang–Europe Railway
 * Yiwu–Madrid railway line
 * Trans–Mongolian Railway

title: List of railway lines in China


text:
User talk:Mark gillman

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 22:22, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 23:00, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Mark gillman


text:
User talk:SoftlySoftly

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 22:22, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

Now that's one curious first edit if I've ever seen one. Rl 22:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:SoftlySoftly


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gus Roberts

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:14, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Gus Roberts
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason given was "patent nonsense", but it doesn't fit the definition; it's perfectly understandable, but seems to be a bad hoax.  — Gwalla | Talk 22:23, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete if it isn't patent nonsense, it's very close. Surely an article in which every single word is untrue counts as vandalism anyway.  And if Gus Roberts is a real person, making him sound like some sort of crazy James Bond villian makes this an attack page. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  22:34, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete bordering on patent nonsense, if it isn't that then it's a hoax article, and if it isn't even that then it would at least fall under original research. Jtkiefer  T - 22:40, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: WP:CSD clearly states that the patent nonsense criterion is "text completely meaningless or unsalvageably incoherent (e.g. random characters)", which I interpret as meaning of the "fhghgfh" or "atomic radar is good yumyum" variety. This, however, is coherent and has meaning; the meaning just happens to be 100% fictional.   — Gwalla | Talk 22:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * You're absolutely right, but sometimes when something is (by Wikipedia terminology) a hoax (ie. complete fiction), in everyday language we'd habitually call it nonsense, which causes confusion sometimes. --TheMidnighters 00:08, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete wtf? Someone's imagination?  Nice new nickname for my cat, though: Mr. Fluffybottom. --  Etacar11   23:59, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete slowly. Sorry, it asserts notability and is no nonsense. No other way. --Dmcdevit·t 00:03, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as clear fiction or original research. Sounds like Dr Evil. Capitalistroadster 00:05, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Crush by sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads. android  79  01:01, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and wonder how on Earth that got through the new CSD. -Splash 01:26, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Fer fuck's sake someone speedy this thing already. Obvious vandalism. I'd love to see someone embarass themselves by bringing it to VfU. -R. fiend 02:32, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I originally nominated it for Speedy using the definition of nonsense: Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make head nor tail of it. I suppose a slow delete works too... just, er, slower.  --Alan Au 04:09, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * This is an underused definition of patent nonsense; a lot of the time it is cited as having to be specifically unintelligible when the criterion is slightly broader than that. However, few are the articles which it iss impossible to make "head [n]or tail of" which are not also unintelligible; it also unclear, to me at least, how we are to interpret the vernacular phrasing. I wonder if this kind of article would be a good test-case: delete it right now on those grounds, deliberately take it to VfU on grounds that it is not patent nonsense and see what happens. Might be a WP:POINT, though. -Splash 04:22, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Obviously untrue claims like the one in this article could rightly be speedily deleted as vandalism, but many people are uncomfortable with this, for some reason. Usually it takes a bold admin to just come and wipe it out. (That would definitely be a WP:POINT, BTW. If this legitimately ended up at VfU after a speedy, well, that'd be rather amusing.) android  79  04:25, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but not speedy. This is obvious Fiction or Hoax, but not speedyable under the current CSD. I have no problem "making head or tail" of it. In fact if the firest sentance were changed to "In the james-bond-like novel Dr SoandSo the character Gus Roberts..." I'll bet it would have a consenssus to keep (assuming that such a novel existed). If this were speedy deleted unde the present rules I would be inclined to put it on VfU. The CSD should not be streached or bent, IMO. DES 14:37, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * You say this is an obvious hoax – a joke article. Joke articles are categorized as vandalism. Vandalism is speediable under criterion A3. android  79  14:49, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * That is an interesting idea. But I don't see anything on the vandalism. page that says that a hoax is a type of vandalism, although it might be implied on the grounds that it is a bad-faith edit. However I would be opposed to making (or considering) a hoax as a reson for speedy deletion, because there ar too many false positives. i have seen several articles nominted for VfD listed as "hoax" where it turns out thet they are accurate but unusual. For example, see Votes for deletion/Elizabeth Foulstar where someone incorrectly thought the page might be a hoax. Too many pages are inaccurately identified as hoaxes for this to be a safe reason for speedy deletion -- let them come to VfDF where several people can give vbiews, and if somehting is infact not a hoax, a citation will no doubt be provided. DES 17:50, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * That said, I would not object to a new reason for speedy deletion the specified using wikipedia to publish fiction, which i think might cover this case, but I don't think that A3 as currently written will cover that. DES 17:50, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I think I will point discussion on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion at this page so more people can consider with pages like this are or ought to be speedy candidates, with is really not relevant to whether thsi particular page shoulod eb dleted via the VfD process, as I trust it will. DES 17:50, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * From Vandalism: Users will sometimes create joke articles or replace existing articles with plausible-sounding nonsense. That's what this is, aside from the "plausible" part. "Gus Roberts is known as the most dangerous person in the history of the world" is patently ridiculous, a far cry from the example you cite. android  79  18:11, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * I see your point, and I missed that phrase. I agree that this case is far more obvious that the one I cited, or than most hoaxes. A clear "joke" article probably does constitute vandalism, at least it is arguable. But I would not want that used on things labeled "hoaxes" for fear of the kind of situations i discuss above. I raised this point on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion, care to comment there? DES 18:27, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The thing is, unchecked fiction is frequently indistinguishable from a hoax, so it makes sense to put it before a greater number of eyes to determine the proper course of action.   — Gwalla | Talk 06:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete using the big red "smite" button. — RJH 19:31, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. JamesBurns 08:30, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Pulpitis

Pulp
Would be good to include in the article a description of symptoms of different stages of pulpitis an they ways they can be alleviated. As it is often the case with medical conditions, people look them up in wiki in order to get some clue about how to deal with them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tadju (talk • contribs) 15:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

What other biological organs have a pulp? — Pekinensis 22:23, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Well, a fruit has a pulp. A fruit is an organ of a plant. Go figure. If you know for sure there are no other organs that have pulpitis, then change the article. 2004-12-29T22:45Z 22:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Google has convinced me that pulpitis is restricted to the teeth. — Pekinensis 22:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

well... by definition pulpitis is inflammation of the pulp... the only part to have a pulp is teeth.

please also add the classification of the lesion ubder discussion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.72.27 (talk) 04:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

"A negative EPT response showed localized necrosis in 25.7% of cases and 72% of cases." Which cases? This doesn't make sense--would someone knowledgeable please correct this?216.40.140.18 (talk) 09:21, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Broken sentence

 * Inflammation associated with a bacterial infection, as in the case of penetrating decay, the pulp chamber is no longer sealed off from the environment of the oral cavity.

Maybe this should be changed to

 * Inflammation is associated with a bacterial infection, because in the case of penetrating decay the pulp chamber is no longer sealed off from the environment of the oral cavity.

However, I am not a dentist and am not sure what the author intended. --Keith111 (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Acute suppurative pulpitis Merge
The article is a subsection of this article, and there's no references or new information in the former article. Moreover, some sources (like this) suggest the term is obsolete and better called a irreversible pulpitis. Shadowjams (talk) 06:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC) Agree with merge. Ashley Payne (talk) 23:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Endorse merger. –blurpeace (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Possible sources about infections, living in the dead tooth
Hi. Please, check are these sources good for article and should we add information about negative consequences of treating root canals? `a5b (talk) 17:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Root Canal Cover-Up, George Meinig, Bion Publishing (CA), 1994, ISBN 9780945196198
 * Root Canal Cover-Up, George Meinig, Bion Publishing (CA), 1994, ISBN 9780945196198
 * Root Canal Cover-Up, George Meinig, Bion Publishing (CA), 1994, ISBN 9780945196198

 * Hi A5b. Medical content on Wikipedia needs to be supported by reliable, mainstream sources. Usually this means review papers (ideally systematic reviews) published in peer review journals, and mainstream medical textbooks. Please see: WP:MEDRS for more info.

 * I would comment that there is no cover up here. I was taught about the complexity of the root canal system when I trained. Agree often root canal merely reduces the bacterial load inside the root canal system to a level which the body's immune system can tolerate (much the same as it tolerates the presence of a certain level of bacteria living below the gumline, or in the tonsils). I would always emphasize that root canal treatment may not work. This is a medicolegal and moral necessity.

 * Retention of the dead tooth shell for cosmetic reasons is usually demanded by patients. One of the sources you placed above mentions the alternatives, bridge, denture, implant. All of these oral prostheses become covered in bacteria. They are "plaque retention factors". I am not pushing root canal above these methods, but they are not perfect alternatives.

 * Also, this statement particularly stood out to me as false:

 * "'Dentists are taught to remove the tooth but leave your periodontal ligament. But as you now know, this ligament can serve as a breeding ground for deadly bacteria. Most experts who've studied this recommend removing the ligament, along with one millimeter of the bony socket, in order to drastically reduce your risk of developing an infection from the bacterially infected tissues left behind.'"

 * The periodontal ligament holds the tooth in the jaw bone. Between the tooth and the gum, there is a small pocket, the gingival crevice (termed "periodontal pocket" if gum disease deepens the pocket >3mm). This pocket ("below the gumline") has a degree of subclinical inflammation even in someone who flosses everyday and has very good oral hygiene. When a tooth is removed, part of the ligament comes off still attached to the tooth and the rest stays behind in the empty socket. The gingival crevice no longer exists once the tooth is gone. The area in which the bacteria where living is gone. As for the section of the periodontal ligament that is retained in the socket, it is needed by the body to begin the healing process of filling in the empty socket with bone. The cells that used to be the soft tissue of the periodontal ligament will eventually become the soft tissue that covers the socket. It also lays done a framework inside the socket for bone to fill in as the healing progresses.

 * By removing the periodontal ligament after performing a tooth extraction, one interferes with this normal healing process. The soft tissue instead would need to grow from the gums around the edge of the socket, which takes longer (see: Dry_socket).

 * That would also strongly increase the risks of complications like dry socket, infected socket, postoperative bleeding, etc. I strongly discourage any such technique, it will only delay healing, cause more postoperative pain, and in all likelihood probably increases the risk of a postoperative infection. It is counter-intuitive. Lesion  ( talk ) 18:20, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

 * See also focal infection theory. Kind regards, Lesion  ( talk ) 18:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Lesion. Are there any connections between insafety of treated root canals and medical states when the human has very weak or no immunity (for example in oncology when doing radiotheraphy/chemoradiation and Bone Marrow Transplant)? `a5b (talk) 23:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know enough about endodontics to comment in detail. The sources you placed above seem to be proponents of the focal infection theory ... I understand this view is not particularly mainstream nowadays. In immunocompromized persons with acute dental infection, these are treated much more aggressively least things get out of hand. Also, people who have bad teeth and who are about to undergo radiotherapy directed at the jaws often have the doubtful teeth removed to prevent later osteoradionecrosis of the jaws. Lesion  ( talk ) 16:52, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Something else regarding scraping (debriding) the socket after an extraction: Some (usually older) dentists and oral surgeons do this routinely. They do this not to remove the remaining periodontal ligament and prevent infection, but in the belief that it will encourage bleeding and therefore make a blood clot in the socket, making dry socket less likely to happen. Note that dry socket (loss of blood clot from socket) is not the same as an infected socket. As I mentioned above, there is no evidence that scraping out the socket reduces the chance of dry socket or infection. As far as I am aware, this practice is reducing as practitioners start to more closely adhere to evidence-based medicine. Lesion  ( talk ) 16:58, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Sourcing
Needs to be updated with current MEDRS. This list gives systematic reviews on the topic, there are six done within the past 5 years. LeadSongDog come howl!  19:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Pulpitis


text: User talk:68.83.208.88

title: User talk:68.83.208.88


text: Talk:Thule

title: Talk:Thule


text:
Brampton railway station

Brampton railway station may refer to:

Canada

 * Brampton GO Station, Ontario, a CNR line station serving VIA and GO passengers
 * Three other railway stations have existed within Brampton's modern borders: Mount Pleasant GO Station, Bramalea GO Station, and the historic Brampton CPR Station

United Kingdom

 * Brampton railway station (Cumbria)
 * Brampton railway station (Suffolk)
 * Brampton railway station (Norfolk)
 * Brampton Halt railway station, Newcastle-under-Lyme
 * Pitsford and Brampton railway station, formerly known as Brampton, Northamptonshire

title: Brampton railway station


text:
User talk:Juicy fisheye

chipping away to improve biology on wikipedia
Yourself and 80.232.73.194 are the same? Welcome again! As you have noticed, there are many corrections and adjustments to be made in wikipedia biology articles. As there are so many of us I think we can chip away over the next few years are really make this a worthwhile resource. I look forward to future collaborations, cheers David D. 16:01, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Hi, guy. Correct, that was me. Yes, let us chip away and be merry!

Small Error
Hi. I wonder if you are aware, there is a small eror on the Talk:Nervous_system page. Your address is somewhere in the mess and I was wondering if you had a moment to look at it. I have tried to sort it out but I am not sure what is being said so I abandoned it.

Matthew 14:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juicy fisheye


text:
Talk:Big Chicken

De-wikified Johnny Reb's
Apart from the Big Chicken, I doubt there's enough notable about Johnny Reb's Chick, Chuck, and Shake to make an article in a modern work about Marietta, let alone an international work like Wikipedia. I therefore de-wikified that link. If there's anything more to be said about Johnny Reb's, it can certainly be included in this article. -- SwissCelt 22:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

WP:FOOD Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Chicken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080102024747/http://www.bigchickenchorus.org/BigChickenLandmark.html to http://www.bigchickenchorus.org/BigChickenLandmark.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 25 June 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) * Pppery * it has begun...  01:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Big Chicken → The Big Chicken – I just created the page Big Chicken (restaurant chain) to cover the chain owned by Shaquille O'Neal. While I think the KFC version is the dominant use of the phrase in restaurants, that is possibly likely to change as the chain expands. I'd suggest adding the definite article at the front to disambiguate it now, as it is always said in context with "The" appended (including in the Wikipedia page). I also created Big Chicken (disambiguation) to separate these related restaurants in the user's mind. Mike Selinker (talk) 07:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 11:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose Per examples like White House (not "The White House") and Eiffel Tower (not "The Eiffel Tower"). Hold off for now, and if the restaurant does not seem like the primary topic any longer, it should be moved to Big Chicken (Georgia) or something like that. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:THE ("If the definite or indefinite article would be capitalized in running text, then include it at the beginning of the Wikipedia article name. "). If a disambiguator is needed, use a parenthetical.  —  AjaxSmack  23:06, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Big Chicken


text:
Talk:Helen Dalley

Query?
is she related to William Bede Dalley writer for the Bulletin?

 * Anonymous comment posted by

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Helen Dalley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050713010536/http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/personalities/HelenDalley.asp to http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/personalities/helendalley.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Helen Dalley


text:
File:MarvinKMooneyWillYouPleaseGoNowBookCover.jpg

Summary
Marvin K. Mooney Will You Please Go Now! book cover


text:
Kyoto Racecourse

Kyoto Racecourse (京都競馬場) is located in Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan. It is used for horse racing. It has a capacity of 120,000. The current stand was built in 1999.

History
Kyoto Racecourse opened at its current location in December 1, 1925.

In preparation for the track's 100th anniversary, Kyoto Race Course will be closed from November 2020 until the Spring of 2023 for grandstand renovations. Races normally run at Kyoto will be moved to either Hanshin Racecourse or Chukyo Racecourse during this time.

Physical attributes
Kyoto Race Course has two turf courses, a dirt course, and a jump course.

The turf's outer oval (外回り) measures 1894m and the inner oval (内回り) measures 1783m. A chute permits races to be run on either oval at distances between 1400m and 1800m. Races can be run on the "A Course" rail setting (on the hedge), the "B Course" setting (rail out 4 meters), the "C Course" setting (rail out 7 metres) or the "D Course" setting (rail out 10 meters).

The dirt course measures 1608 metres, with a 1400m chute.

Source:

Track records
Source：レコードタイム表 (Record time table) -> 京都競馬場 (Kyoto Racecourse)
 * † Reference Time.
 * Last updated on October 18, 2020.

title: Kyoto Racecourse


text: User talk:85.98.60.131

title: User talk:85.98.60.131


text:
Tokyo Racecourse

Tokyo Racecourse (東京競馬場) is located in Fuchū, Tokyo, Japan. Built in 1933 for horse racing, it is considered the "racecourse of racecourses" in Japanese horseracing. It has a capacity of 223,000, with seating for 13,750.

Tokyo Racecourse hosts numerous G1 (Grade 1) races, including the Japan Cup, Tokyo Yushun (the Japanese Derby) and the Yasuda Kinen, a part of the Asian Mile Challenge.

Physical attributes
Tokyo Race Course's grass course measures 2083m (1¼ miles + 234 feet) with two chutes (1800m and 2000m). Races can be run on the "A Course" rail setting (on the hedge), the "B Course" setting (rail out 3 meters), the "C Course" setting (rail out 6 meters), the "D Course" setting (rail out 9 meters) or the "E Course" setting (rail out 12 meters).

The dirt course measures 1899 meters (1⅛ mile + 290 feet), with a 1600m chute.

The jump course measures 1675 meters (1 mile + 215 feet).

There was a chute for 3200m races (used for the Tenno Sho Autumn races), but when the race was shortened to 2000m, the 3200m chute was useless and is not in use as of today.

The course was renovated in 2007 (started in 2000), adding the world's largest video screen and upgrading a grandstand, named the "Fuji View Stand", which in today is the main grandstand of the course. The "Memorial 60" grandstand was also added.

All races have a US style gate run distance of approximately 5 metres, before official timing begins.

The high-definition video screen measured 218 ft wide by only 37 ft high at 8066 sqft. In 2009 Kauffman Stadium in Kansas City, Missouri took the world's largest title with an 84 ft by 104 ft is 8736 sqft screen.

Transportation
The racecourse is linked to Fuchūkeiba-seimommae Station by a footbridge. Another footbridge connects the racecourse with the Fuchuhonmachi Station of JR East.

Track records
Source：レコードタイム表 (Record time table) -> 東京競馬場 (Tokyo Racecourse)
 * † Reference Time.
 * Last updated on November 4, 2023.

title: Tokyo Racecourse


text:
Talk:Chi-Chi (Dragon Ball)

Trivia Note
Trivia Note: In Dragon Ball, its a little known or mentioned fact that, as a small child, Chi-Chi was wearing a fully-functional Ultra Seven helmet! (I was always sorry that she ceased wearing this little weapon of mass destruction when she got older!) <;   ---Patsy

Lineage
Hey, just wondering if it's worth noting that Chi-Chi is half demon (considering that her father's name means "Ox Demon King").

It's just a name

wrong
this page is wrong,chi chi is not in tenkaichi 2

 * I'm not exactly sure as to what your taking about, but the only thing I saw with the word "Tenkaichi" in it was when they said that Chi-Chi appears in the Super Dragon Ball Z game in the outfit she used in the 23rd Tenkaichi Budokai. Sasuk  e  -kun  27  20:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Is it worth talking about the garlic junior saga where Chi Chi actually fights gohan? as this is an artical about the whole character i would think that as interesting information?

Peer review alert!
Attention Dragon Ball experts; Son Goten, an article that is closely related to this article is being Peer Reviewed. Please help out with the peer review by giving your opinions, statements, and most importantly; voice at the review. The peer review's page can be found here. SGFF 01:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Chi-Chi (Dragon Ball)


text:
Hipódromo de San Isidro

The Hipódromo de San Isidro is a horse racing track located in San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina, owned by the Argentine Jockey Club. It is one of the largest and most important racetracks in the Americas. 120 racing days are held per year, on every Wednesday, every other Friday and Saturday, and some Sundays.

The Hipódromo is located 22 km from Buenos Aires City. It has an area of 1.48 km2.

Each December, the Hipódromo hosts the Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, the most important horse race in Argentina.

The Hipódromo de San Isidro hosts the annual Carlos Pellegrini Awards.

History
In 1926, the Argentine Jockey Club purchased 316 hectares for the purposes of building an additional racecourse to accompany its Hipódromo de Palermo. In 1930, a golf course was completed on the property, designed by Allister Mckenzie. The course itself was built using the latest methods, with accompanying training tracks, stalls, and veterinary hospital building. On December 8, 1935, the racecourse was completed and opened.

An inner dirt track was added in 1994.

Facilities
The racecourse occupies an area of 148 hectares, with a main turf course 2783 m around, 45 m wide, and with a chute for straight races of 1000 m, races of 1400 m using a diagonal, and a chute for single turn races of 2400 m. The inner dirt course is 2590 m around and 31 m wide, allowing it to host races of up to 24 horses.

The grandstands have a capacity of 100,000, with 32000 m2 of covered seating. The record attendance is 300,000 for the 2022 LollaPalooza Argentina.

The property includes five training tracks, covering 94 hectares, including a 30 m wide and 2420 m long turf track, a 25 m wide and 2247 m long sand track, a 25 m wide and 2100 m long dirt track, and two smaller river sand tracks. There are 135 stables containing 1,800 stalls.

Other amenities include a chemical laboratory that processes post-race samples from across the country, a veterinary hospital with a Center for Regenerative Veterinary Medicine, a school for apprentice jockeys, a school for farriers, an arboretum, and a sales floor for horses containing space for 3,600 people.

Important races
Group 1 Races

 * Copa de Oro Alfredo Lalor
 * Copa de Plata Roberto Vasquez Mansilla Internacional
 * Dos Mil Guineas
 * Gran Criterium
 * Gran Premio 25 de Mayo - Copa Dr. Enrique Olivera
 * Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini Internacional
 * Gran Premio de Potrancas
 * Gran Premio Enrique Acebal
 * Gran Premio Felix de Alzaga Unzué Internacional
 * Gran Premio Hipódromo de San Isidro - Copa Melchor Ángel Posse
 * Gran Premio Joaquin S. de Anchorena Internacional
 * Gran Premio Jockey Club
 * Gran Premio Miguel Alfredo Martínez de Hoz
 * Gran Premio Suipacha
 * Mil Guineas

Group 2 Races

 * Gran Premio 9 de Julio
 * Gran Premio América
 * Gran Premio Carlos P. Rodriguez
 * Gran Premio Cyllene
 * Gran Premio Ecuador
 * Gran Premio Eliseo Ramírez
 * Gran Premio Federico de Alvear
 * Gran Premio Forli
 * Gran Premio Horacio Bustillo
 * Gran Premio Juan Shaw
 * Gran Premio La Mission
 * Gran Premio Los Haras
 * Gran Premio Omega
 * Gran Premio Partícula
 * Gran Premio Paseana
 * Gran Premio Pippermint
 * Gran Premio Raúl y Raúl E. Chevallier
 * Gran Premio Ricardo Ezequiel y Ezequiel M. Fernández Guerrico
 * Gran Premio Sibila

Group 3 Races

 * Gran Premio Botafogo
 * Gran Premio Condesa
 * Gran Premio de la Provincia de Buenos Aires César Iraola
 * Gran Premio Ensayo Fernando Santamarina
 * Gran Premio Eudoro J. Balsa
 * Gran Premio General Las Heras
 * Gran Premio General Pueyrredón
 * Gran Premio General Viamonte
 * Gran Premio Invasor
 * Gran Premio Ocurrencia
 * Gran Premio Olavarría
 * Gran Premio Pedro Chapar
 * Gran Premio Porteño
 * Gran Premio Progreso
 * Gran Premio Santiago Lawrie
 * Gran Premio Southern Halo
 * Gran Premio Velocidad

title: Hipódromo de San Isidro


text:
User talk:65.208.210.97

April 2006
Please do not interfere with the AfD process. This includes removing Article for Deletion notices and tampering with AfD votes. If you continue to do so you may be blocked. If you disagree with the proposed deletion of the Enterprise Audit Shell article, please discuss it on the article's articles for deletion page instead. Thanks, ⇒    SWAT Jester     Ready    Aim    Fire!  23:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

May 2006
You cannot remove warnings from your talk page. it is considered vandalism. Big E 1977 04:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

December 2006
You edits to Toyota Tacoma.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Toyota Tacoma, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hondasaregood 21:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hondasaregood 20:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Health care. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 14:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

January 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Body language, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Zapvet 00:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

March 2007
Your edits to Military of Pakistan, Pakistan Navy and unsigned comment was added by Jkeelwd (talk • contribs) 03:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC).

July 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Dead Poets Society. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 16:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pakistan Navy. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 20:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Pakistan Air Force, you will be blocked from editing. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 20:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Pakistan Coast Guard, you will be blocked from editing. -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 20:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 12 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. WjBscribe 20:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

February 2008
Your recent edit to Acetylcysteine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to GodsWar Online has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexnia (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to GodsWar Online constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Gail (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

 * Hi. Please do not insert false or misleading information into an article, as you did to The Used. It may be considered vandalism or even libel, as the reference specificly cited Kelly Osbourne. Please stop, and consider contributing to the encyclopedia rather than potentially damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. ~ A H  1 (TCU) 21:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

August 2009
Your recent edit to the page UFC 106 appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  "Hopefully, November 21 will be the date.”; That isn't reliable. -- Drr-darkomen (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cueshe, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --- Tito Pao (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Cueshé. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Alansohn (talk) 02:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cueshe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --- Tito Pao (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chico, California, you will be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 18:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2010
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Latin Kings (gang), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nlu (talk) 16:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - Happysailor  (Talk) 09:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kushwaha, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sprinting faster (talk) 15:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Repeated and persistant vandalism
It is regretful to say that this IP is being still used for vandalism. It is suggested that this IP be banned as enough/last warnings have been given. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthalwaystriumphs (talk • contribs) 16:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
Your addition to Kushwaha has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Inappropriate changes to article
Hey yiou are not desisting from making incorrect changes to unsigned comment added by Truthalwaystriumphs (talk • contribs) 11:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Kushwaha . Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 07:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 19 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Albertsons page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=626274041 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F626274041%7CAlbertsons%5D%5D Ask for help])

January 2017
Hello, I'm AntiCompositeNumber. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:2601:140:C002:D0F0:14F4:2750:1E53:31FA with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 21:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2017
Hello, I'm BangJan1999. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Malcolm Butler have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BangJan1999 20:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Battle Mountain, Nevada has been reverted. Your edit here to Battle Mountain, Nevada was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://vimeo.com/188152202) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2018
Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Aquaman_(film)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 04:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, I'm Kadane. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rolling Papers 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Kadane (talk) 20:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Power Rangers Megaforce
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Power Rangers Megaforce, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:65.208.210.97


text:
Athletics at the 1900 Summer Olympics – Men's 400 metres

The men's 400 metres was a track & field athletics event at the 1900 Summer Olympics in Paris. It was held on July 14, and July 15, 1900. The races were held on a track of 500 metres in circumference. 15 athletes from six nations competed.

Background
This was the second time the event was held. None of the runners from 1896 returned. Maxie Long of the United States was favored, as 1898 and 1899 AAU champion and 1900 AAA champion. His countryman Dixon Boardman was a strong challenger, having beaten Long at the 1900 IC4A.

The United States and France made their second appearances in the event; Denmark, Hungary, Italy, and Norway made their debuts.

Competition format
There were two rounds: heats and a final. The top 2 runners in each heat advanced to the final.

Records
These were the standing world and Olympic records (in seconds) prior to the 1900 Summer Olympics.

(*) unofficial 440 yards (= 402.34 m)

Maxie Long set a new Olympic record in the first round with 50.4 seconds. In the final he improved his own record when he ran 49.4 seconds.

Schedule
All times are Central European Time (UTC+1)

Semifinals
In the first round, there were three heats. They were held on July 14. The top two runners in each advanced to the final.

Semifinal 1
This heat, featuring four American runners, resulted in an easy win for Long and the top three spots for the United States team.

Semifinal 2
Again, an American won the heat easily. Schulz took second place to qualify for the final.

Semifinal 3
The United States runners again took all three of the top spots in this heat.

Final
Boardman, Lee, and Moloney all withdrew because the final was held on a Sunday, but Long and Holland elected to start.

Long led the entire way to beat Holland by five yards, with Schultz finishing 20 yards behind the Americans.


text:
User talk:Angelagardner

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 22:30, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

title: User talk:Angelagardner


text:
Talk:Born secret

US bias (assuming this is about the US)
I have no problem with articles about the use of phrases laws, and concepts in the US. But as long as this is an international encyclopedia, you can't simply assume we know it is about the US. Which government? Whose uses this term? Please make clear the context. I'd fix it, but I have no knowledge of the subject --Doc (?) 22:31, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

 * I don't know if there are analogs in other countries so I left that open (a statement of "this may or may not only apply to the USA" seemed somewhat meaningless to me). I thought I had specified that the lengthy example was from the US but I guess I just cited the legislation. --Fastfission 01:20, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

It is fine now. A 'this may or may not apply' statement is (as you say) unneccessary and silly - all that needs to be clear is that you are talking about the US. A simple 'In the US Born Secret ...' suffices - if someone else knows about another nation, they can expand it later. My problem is when there is not nation mentioned, and we are all to assume its about the US - as if US was the defaut field of interest in WP - that is systematic bias. But, as I say, I think the article is just fine now. Cheers --Doc (?) 09:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Sources drop for possible expansion

 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03064228008533026
 * https://sgp.fas.org/library/quist2/chap_3.html
 * https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/hss/Classification/news/CommuniQue200602.pdf
 * https://sgp.fas.org/library/quist/chap_4.pdf
 * https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96B01172R000400040003-2.pdf
 * Restricted Data
 * https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/4967/chapter/5
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/24752761
 * https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/b96e474f-064e-4056-94d7-92aad943651b
 * https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1997-12-31/html/97-33949.htm
 * https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/cia-torture-classified-memory/395657/
 * Born classified in the AEC
 * https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-8312-9_4
 * https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/20030701/
 * https://www.nature.com/articles/302770a0.pdf

Just a somewhat unvetted as of yet list. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Born secret


text:
User talk:Samr

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Samr 02:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Conservative_notice_board
Hello, I noticed that you identify as a conservative Wikipedian. So I would like to invite you to post any conservative issues you might have over at the new project page, Conservative_notice_board. Thanks. --Facto 05:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Iraq and the War on Terrorism
WOT has opened its straw poll, and is open to discussion. Rangeley 00:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Seattlemuseumofflight_blackbird.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Seattlemuseumofflight_blackbird.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 04:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Samr


text:
Brampton railway station (Cumbria)

Brampton (Cumbria) is a railway station on the Tyne Valley Line, which runs between Newcastle and Carlisle via Hexham. The station, situated 10 mi east of Carlisle, serves the hamlet of Milton and the town of Brampton, Cumberland in Cumbria, England. It is owned by Network Rail and managed by Northern Trains.

History
The Newcastle and Carlisle Railway was formed in 1829, and was opened in stages. The station was opened in July 1836, following the opening of the Newcastle and Carlisle Railway between Greenhead and Carlisle London Road.

Upon opening, the station was called Milton, or possibly, Milton for Brampton. According to Quick (2022), the station has since been renamed several times. Nowadays, the station is commonly suffixed as Brampton (Cumbria), in order to distinguish it from the station of the same name in Suffolk.

Brampton operated as a junction station from opening in 1836, linking with a short branch line, the Brampton Railway, known locally as The Dandy. The line, which was initially horse-drawn, ran into the town, terminating at Brampton Town. This short branch line was taken over by the North Eastern Railway in 1912, with the track relaid and locomotive operated services resuming from August 1913, with a break from 1917 to 1920. The line was closed in 1923, with most of the former route now serving as a public footpath.

The station was also the junction of another railway serving the local collieries owned by the Earl of Carlisle. Known as Lord Carlisle's Railway, this ran to a junction with the Alston Line at Lambley. This mineral railway closed in March 1953.

The first Station Master at Brampton was Thomas Edmondson, who introduced cardboard tickets and later developed the ticket dating machine.

The station was host to a camping coach from 1935 to 1939 – one of 119 vehicles converted by the London and North Eastern Railway between 1933 and 1938.

Brampton was reduced to an unstaffed halt in 1967, along with most of the other stations on the line that escaped the Beeching Axe. The former station buildings were subsequently demolished in stages during the 1970s and 1980s.

Facilities
The station has two platforms, both of which have a ticket machine (which accepts card or contactless payment only), seating, waiting shelter, next train audio and visual displays and an emergency help point. There is step-free access to both platforms, however the Carlisle-bound platform is not fully accessible from the station's car park. Both platforms are also linked by a pre-grouping metal footbridge, similar to those at Haltwhistle and Wetheral. There is a small car park at the station.

Brampton (Cumbria) is part of the Northern Trains penalty fare network, meaning that a valid ticket or promise to pay notice is required prior to boarding the train.

Services
As of the December 2023 timetable change, there are ten trains per day (eleven on Saturday and nine on Sunday) heading west towards Carlisle. Heading east towards Newcastle via Hexham, there are eleven trains per day (ten on Saturday and eight on Sunday). Some trains extend to Morpeth or Nunthorpe via Hartlepool. All services are operated by Northern Trains.

Rolling stock used: Class 156 Super Sprinter and Class 158 Express Sprinter

title: Brampton railway station (Cumbria)