text:
User talk:Cbm36

Welcome!
Hello, Cbm36, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  20:39, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:St salvators crest.JPG, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 16:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:St_leonards_crest.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:St_leonards_crest.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cbm36


text:
Misery (Beatles song)

"Misery" is a song by the English rock band the Beatles from their 1963 debut album Please Please Me. It was co-written by John Lennon and Paul McCartney. According to Lennon, "It was kind of a John song more than a Paul song, but it was written together." McCartney was to say: "I don't think either one of us dominated on that one, it was just a hacking job."

A 1963 single by Kenny Lynch made "Misery" the first Beatles' song to be covered by another artist.

Background
In February 1963, Helen Shapiro was Britain's most successful female singer (having first achieved chart success two years earlier at the age of 14), and The Beatles were fifth on the bill as part of her nationwide tour of the United Kingdom. Her artist and repertoire manager, Norrie Paramor, was looking for new material for a country and western album she planned to record in Nashville, Tennessee and suggested that the Beatles compose a song especially for her. "Misery" was started backstage before The Beatles' performance at the King's Hall, Stoke-on-Trent, on 26 January 1963, and later completed at Paul McCartney's Forthlin Road home. At the time, McCartney commented: "We've called it 'Misery', but it isn't as slow as it sounds, it moves along at quite a pace, and we think Helen will make a pretty good job of it." But Paramor considered it unsuitable, and so British singer and entertainer Kenny Lynch, who was on the same tour, recorded it instead (HMV Pop 1136), thus becoming the first artist to cover a Lennon–McCartney composition although he failed to enter the charts with it. In 1973, Lynch appeared in the cover photograph for McCartney's album, Band on the Run.

When the Beatles needed original material for their Please Please Me LP, they recorded it themselves, giving its treatment, according to writer Ian MacDonald, "a droll portrait of adolescent self-pity". It was credited to McCartney and Lennon in that order, as were all other Lennon & McCartney originals on the Please Please Me album. The songwriting credit was changed to what would become the more familiar "Lennon–McCartney" for their second album, With the Beatles. McCartney: "It was our first stab at a ballad and had a little spoken preface. It was co-written. I don't think either of us dominated on that one, it was just a job, you could have called us hacks, hacking out a song for someone." (Barry Miles. Paul McCartney: Many Years From Now).

The Beatles recorded "Misery" on 11 February 1963 (marathon session) in 11 takes. Norman Smith was the engineer.

George Martin played the piano solo, which was added at a later date, and preferred recording this onto the recorded track at half speed an octave below, which would then sound correct at normal speed.

Release

 * British LP: Please Please Me
 * American LP: Introducing... The Beatles
 * British EP: The Beatles (No. 1)

Personnel

 * John Lennon – lead vocals, acoustic rhythm guitar
 * Paul McCartney – lead vocals, bass guitar
 * George Harrison – lead guitar
 * Ringo Starr – drums
 * George Martin – piano, producer
 * Personnel per MacDonald

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Misery (Beatles song)


text:
User talk:RichardNeill

Welcome!
Hello, RichardNeill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  20:39, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Your new entry
Hi. Do you think your new entry Disection should really go to Wiktionary? Also, should not the definition say that Disection means "cutting into two equal pieces" rather than "cutting into (exactly) two pieces" as it exists now? If you cut something in two it is hard to not have exactly two pieces. Moriori 03:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Poincaré conjecture
Hello, Wikipedia's fair use policy does not allow the posting of copyrighted material. Please refrain from adding copyrighted material to articles or talk pages. Lessthanthree 00:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Article Talk Pages
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Wyatt Riot 14:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Sorry about that. I've reverted myself on Talk:Liquid crystal display. Hopefully someone can add that information into the article. I don't know much about LCDs myself, I just drop in to remove linkspam from time to time.  :)  Wyatt Riot 22:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ferrari Spumante

The article Ferrari Spumante has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable WP:WINERY WP:ADVERT. Only claim of notability seems to be confusion with the car company with an online search revealing very little in ways of reliable sources that will help establish WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AgneCheese/Wine 06:40, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Troubadour Wembley Park Theatre

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Troubadour Wembley Park Theatre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 02:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:RichardNeill


text:
User talk:SNIyer1/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Lst27 18:49, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please stop adding content that is speculative and of minor relevance to Canada and the 2004 U.S. presidential election - SimonP 05:38, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)

Ronald Reagan
Hi, I noticed that you re-added some content to the Ronald Reagan article that had previously been removed. It was removed because of some discussion on the talk page. If you disagree with the reasoning behind removing the text, please discuss the issue with us there. Thanks! Neilc 05:48, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

JFK
You are adding several emotional opinions which I am sure are heartfelt, but it is not up to you to decide what is the MAIN reason people are sorry about his assassination -- and I think stating it was his youth trivializes it.... --JimWae 22:01, 2004 Nov 23 (UTC)

How can you say what is below? Even though those are the TWO most shocking events in my life, many people in many parts of the world have felt shock on other occasions too. I am sure people who lost family members in the SF earthquake might feel differently. An encyclopedia is not supposed to focus on people recounting their feelings about events
 * Only one other event since the assassination has the shock of the assassination been felt: the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

You have both Sunday & Monday as "the day of drums".

Your edit that starts a sentence as Like 9/11 makes the construction of the entire sentence awkward - and puts another topic ahead of the topic of the article. 9/11 is also referred to elsewhere in the same article, is it not?

Please be careful about how much sentiment you try to convey in your contributions - an encyclopedia is quite different from both a novel and a poem. --JimWae 20:41, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)

I know something is bothering you and you are trying to express it. But your words here are inappropriate for an encyclopedia - in fact sometimes they barely make sense. I have tried to phrase your contributions to improve the wording, but you are making the entire article seem too sentimental & too much like a cheap romance novel or cheap tragedy.

Have you noticed other people are bothered by how maudlin some of what you add is? Yet you just keep putting back the same inadequate wordings that others remove. Are you aware that in the end, all your melodramatic words will disappear from the encyclopedia? Wouldn't you rather work on a lasting contribution?

It is one of the protocols of wikipedia that you discuss disputes on this page, rather than just making changes that are little different from vandalism. You are being rude by acting as though you own the article.

There are so many problems with what you have written.

The #2 guy from Soviet Union did not lead the procession. My Internet search indicates it was indeed the person whose name you keep removing (without indicating why), the King Baudouin of Belgium

There were 111 countries in the UN that day - why the continued focus on just 3 of the 20 or more that were not here?

The term "Years of Lightning, Day of Drums" comes from a documentary film so entitled. We do not need comments here so tied to a film that make a entire day begin at 11 am and end before 4pm.

If you can find some reference to it being called the "day of drums" other than the film documentary, please say so. It does seem somewhat appropriate, given the steady drumbeat that accompanied the funeral, but you have not built a foundation for such a reference.

I can tell we are making some headway, because you did not add the other term which you had not laid foundation for "Years of Lightning". (If you do it now, you will be demonstrating your immaturity even for a lady your age.)

Perhaps you can also give some account for why 9/11 need be mentioned thrice (so far) in this same short article, and why intricate details of 9/11 belong here.

You are very high maintenance, Lady SNIyer1

The more melodrama you put into the article, the more closely others will scrutinize it - and some have already removed some wording that could have survived otherwise.

--JimWae 07:45, 2004 Nov 28 (UTC)

Links
Hello. Why did you unlink some names at the UPI article? Were you just removing links to articles not yet written? Wondering, -- Infrogmation 22:42, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

PA 103
Hi, I saw your edit on PA 103 and that you removed that the first flight was PA 103A. I was just wondering why you did that, because I believe you did it a couple of weeks ago too (if it wasn't you, my apologies). Best, SlimVirgin 03:01, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)

JFK DOB Info
Plese stop your constant removal of the John F. Kennedy fact that he was the first President born in the 20th century. I have put this on the article's talk page, but you have not responded to my question about why you are doing this. He WAS the first U.S. President born in the 20th century and this is in nearly every history book I have ever seen about him. I have put this info back into the article and will continue to revert your changes. If you continue these deletions, without explaining why or giving some reason, this may become a case of article vandalism. Dont mean to upset you, but I dont know why you keep on taking that statement out of the JFK article -Husnock 24Jan05

PA 103 again
Hi, I wonder if you would mind explaining what your aims are regarding the PA 103 article? You often add factoids that don't seem quite relevant: for example, adding that the U.S. ambassador and a British politician thought it might be a bombing on the night, when we now know, years later, that it was a bombing, adds nothing to the article, and somewhat disturbs the narrative flow. (Almost everyone thought it was a bombing on the night, not just those two.) Or you add material that is both irrelevant and not verifiable; for example, today's edit that it was a Boeing spokesperson who said the aircraft was the 15th to be made. First, how do you know this and second why is it relevant? If you want to cite a source, you'll have to say where the spokesperson said this, and if you feel it ought to be cited, we could add a link to the reference, but simply adding that a spokesperson said it somewhere to someone isn't citing a source. At other times, you have removed information, without explanation, that was true and relevant e.g. that PA 103 was the name of the flight from Heathrow to JFK, and that it was called PA 103A from Frankfurt to London. If you could explain what you're trying to achieve, I could perhaps help you, rather than just reverting. Best, SlimVirgin 15:43, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)

 * Hello again, as you can see, I'm doing a rewrite of PA 103 in order to make it more complete and to improve the writing. First, can I ask you to mark your very minor additions with an "m", so that I know not to check them? You are making several tiny changes in a row, saving each time, instead of using the "preview" button, and not marking them as minor, which means there is a lot to check, most of it unnecessary. Second, the non-minor additions you're making are not improving the article. For example, you added to the intro: "It was also the worst act of terrorist violence against the United Kingdom until September 11, 2001--44 of the victims were British citizens, including the 11 residents of Lockerbie. However, the bombing remains the worst act of terrorist violence within British borders." It was not the worst act of terrorism against the UK. It was not directed at the UK. That it landed in Lockerbie was pure chance and almost certainly unintended by the bombers. The target was the U.S. Secondly, if you're going to add all the worst things it was, you will bloat the intro, and it is already very long, so we have to choose our "worsts" carefully. You also added this: "The aftermath of the bombing saw the best of the people of Lockerbie. In the days after the bombing, they pleaded for relatives of the victims to come so that they could get comfort. In the time that has followed, the people in Lockerbie have formed a friendship with relatives of the victims. They also have helped them locate where their loved ones fell when the aircraft exploded. Over the years, they have shown that they will never forget what had happened, but they're keen to look ahead and reclaim their town for the future." This is POV and non-encyclopedic, and unfortunately it can't stay in the article for that reason. Regarding adding that it was the 15th 747 to be built, I don't see the need for that in an already very long intro.

 * As I'm trying to improve the article at the moment, would you mind discussing your changes with me, or perhaps waiting until I've finished the re-write? Many thanks, SlimVirgin 04:00, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

 * Also, I'd like to note that you didn't reply to my first enquiry to you about the article. SlimVirgin 04:00, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

Your edits are disputed: use the talk page to discuss them
Hi. I'm seeing that some of your edits to September 11, 2001 attacks and other pages are being disputed. At the same time, I can't help noticing that of your last 1000 edits, none of them have been made to any talk page. I find this very worrisome. Note that it is Wikipedia policy to achieve consensus in case of a dispute (see: Resolving disputes). I therefore urge you to state your case on the relevant talk pages, rather than just re-inserting deleted content over and over again. Thanks. --Plek 21:41, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You NEED to communicate with people regarding their objections to your edits. You can't ignore their comments. Please do not continue to ignore others' objections and refuse to work with people in getting to a consensus. Moncrief 22:50, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

Hello. You have just reinserted a disputed section of text into the September 11, 2001 attacks article. I have removed it: a discussion is ongoing about this topic at Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks. I strongly urge you to work at building consensus by adding to that discussion. --Plek 23:01, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Use the edit summary field, please
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Plek 23:06, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

U.S. presidential election, 1976
Hi:

When I excised your sentence about Richard Nixon being term-limited, I gave reasons for the excision on the talk page, namely:

 * Your sentence gives the impression that the only reason Nixon wasn't running was that he was term-limited, when, even if there was no 22nd amendment, he wouldn't have been nominated.
 * Nixon isn't relevant to the election. He wasn't the incumbent (that's Ford).  If merely being a term-limited former president is sufficient to get a sentence in the election article, then there should be sentences in the 1980, 1984, 1988, and 1992 presidential election stating that Nixon was term-limited.

If you wish to reinsert your sentence, please give some sort of reason for it. — DLJessup 13:41, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Parliament Hill
SNIyer1, this is to give you fair warning that if you continue to insert schmalz into Wikipedia, I will revert your edits on sight without even reading them. Edits like this: "During many major events in Canada, Canadians gather on the lawn ... and understand the life of Canada ... They also understand that they are part of history," are unencyclopedic and inappropriate. Please read Neutral point of view and No original research. You've inserted similar material into numerous articles, and you're wasting the time of editors who have to hunt it down and delete it. Please stop. You must also leave a description of your edit in the edit summary, and should tick the "minor edit" box if it is a minor edit. Also, please start using the "show preview" option rather than saving all the time. SlimVirgin 01:11, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)

Trudeau
Will you please clarify why you chose to upload image:TrudeauLyingInState.jpg even though it is copyrighted? - Montrealais

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
I am trying to bring this article up to featured standard, and in looking at the article's history, I noticed that you added a substantial amount of info to it. I assume you got that info from one or more external websites, and if that is the case, could you tell me what those websites were, so I can cite them properly? Denelson83 22:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Quotation Marks
Please read Manual_of_Style. You make edits that consist almost entirely of reversions of the punctuation recommended Oops, it seems I misread some of your edits re quotation marks. Sorry about that, but what about 20th century? --JimWae 04:50, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
 * also why do you keep deleting 1st president to be born in 20th Century?--JimWae 04:36, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)

cut and paste moves
Use the move button or submit a move request. Do not cut and paste the contents of articles to change titles. Gamaliel 05:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please follow the rules outlined at How to rename (move) a page. DO NOT cut and paste the contents of articles merely to change the titles. We have these rules in order to preserve the continuity of the page history. This is the second time I've had to ask you to refrain from doing this. Please do not do it again. Gamaliel 18:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 00:30, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism
How is your repeated deletion of material from JFK article without any explanation (when I do include explanation & request your reasons) any different from vandalism?--JimWae 2005 June 30 04:13 (UTC)

July 2005 - JFK stuff
Do you even know what NPOV is? --JimWae 2005 July 8 00:00 (UTC)

JFK again......
see: Talk:State funeral of John F. Kennedy --JimWae 03:36, 2005 July 13 (UTC)

Why do you switch between SNIyer1 & SNIyer12? --JimWae 03:36, 2005 July 13 (UTC)

title: User talk:SNIyer1/Archive 1


text:
Gilroy Unified School District

Gilroy Unified School District is located in the southernmost tip of Santa Clara Valley, California.

The Gilroy Unified School District was created in 1966 when several small school districts joined with the Gilroy School District. The other school districts included San Ysidro and Rucker. It covers an area of over 600 square miles, and during the 2012–2013 school year had approximately 11,000 students.

The school district currently consists of four high schools (Gilroy High School, Christopher High School, Gilroy Early College Academy, and Mt. Madonna Continuation High School), three middle schools (Brownell, Solorsano, and South Valley), and eight elementary schools (Antonio Del Buono, El Roble, Eliot, Glen View, Las Animas, Luigi Aprea, Rod Kelley, and Rucker). The District also operates a pre-school program.

One charter school, Gilroy Prep School, has been chartered by the school board and opened in 2011 serving students grades K - 8.

Awards and recognition

 * Christopher High - 2015 California Gold Ribbon School
 * Gilroy High - 1994 and 2009 California Distinguished School
 * Gilroy Early College Academy - 2015 California Gold Ribbon School, 2013 California Distinguished School
 * Mt. Madonna Continuation - 2015 California Model Continuation High School
 * Ascencion Solorsano Middle - 2007 and 2013 California Distinguished School, 2007 Title I Academic Achievement School
 * Brownell Middle - 2015 California Gold Ribbon School
 * Glen View Elementary - 1997 California Distinguished School
 * Las Animas Elementary - 2016 California Gold Ribbon Schools Award, 2008 California Distinguished School, 2009 Title I Academic Achievement School
 * Rod Kelley Elementary - 2016 California Gold Ribbon Schools Award

Schools
High Schools Middle Schools Elementary Schools Charter Schools
 * Gilroy High School
 * Dr. TJ Owens Gilroy Early College Academy (GECA)
 * Christopher High School
 * Mt. Madonna Continuation High School
 * South Valley Middle School
 * Brownell Middle School
 * Ascencion Solorsano Middle School
 * Rucker Elementary School
 * Eliot Elementary School
 * Glen View Elementary School
 * Las Animas Elementary School
 * Antonio del Buono Elementary School
 * Luigi Aprea Elementary School
 * El Roble Elementary School
 * Rod Kelley Elementary School
 * Gilroy Prep School

Board of education
Gilroy Unified is overseen by a publicly elected seven member board of education, elected at-large for four year terms. Among its duties, this body appoints the superintendent to function as the district's chief executive for carrying out day-to-day decisions and policy implementations.

The term for these trustees ends in 2020:
 * Mark Good
 * BC Doyle
 * James E. Pace

The term for these trustees expires in 2018:
 * Heather Bass
 * Linda Piceno
 * Pat Midtgaard
 * Jaime Rosso

title: Gilroy Unified School District


text:
Anna (Go to Him)

"Anna (Go to Him)", or simply "Anna", is a song written and originally recorded by Arthur Alexander. His version was released as a single by Dot Records on September 17, 1962. A cover version was performed by the Beatles and included on their 1963 debut album Please Please Me. A Spanish-language cover version was performed by Grupo Pegasso and included on their 1996 album Amor Vendido, Vol. 4, followed by an English version in 2019.

Background and lyrics
Alexander based the song's lyrics on the early days of his relationship with his girlfriend (and later wife) Ann, and how her former boyfriend, who hailed from a wealthy family, attempted to win her back. Alexander's biographer, Richard Younger, notes that, "Though it was surely Arthur who had been unfaithful in his marriage vows, in the song he puts himself in the role of the abandoned lover." According to Younger, Alexander stated that, though his wife had indeed not been unfaithful to him, he believed that she had begun to regret not taking back her former boyfriend, who had since "moved on". Alexander's marriage to Ann would ultimately end in divorce.

Despite the song's title, throughout the song the lyric is "go with him" rather than "go to him". Regarding the additional syllable added to Ann's name in the song, Alexander said, "it just fit better than Ann."

Release and reception
According to Richie Unterberger, music critic for AllMusic:

""Anna" was one of the great early soul ballads, even if its loping groove was closer to a mid-tempo song than a slow ballad. Like several of Alexander's songs, it would come to be more famous in its cover version than through its original release. And it was actually a small hit when it first came out in 1962, getting to #68 in the pop charts and #10 in the R&B listings."

Critic Dave Marsh rates Alexander's "Anna (Go to Him)" as one of the top 1001 singles of all time. He praises the "gently swinging rhythm," the tough, syncopated drumming, and Alexander's vocal, particularly at the beginning of the refrain, suggesting that Beatles member John Lennon may have learned to sing ballads like "In My Life" by listening to Alexander's performance.

The song plays a prominent role in the Married... with Children episode "Oldies But Young 'Uns". In the episode, the song becomes an earworm for Al Bundy, who desperately wants to know the title.

The Beatles' version
A personal favorite of John Lennon, it became part of the Beatles' early repertoire and was consequently recorded by them for their 1963 debut album, Please Please Me.

In the U.S., Vee Jay Records released it on Introducing... The Beatles (January 10, 1964) and Capitol Records re-released it on The Early Beatles (March 22, 1965). Vee Jay also released "Anna (Go to Him)" on the EP Souvenir of Their Visit: The Beatles in the US.

Recording
The band recorded the song on February 11, 1963, in three takes; Take 3 was the master. It was remixed on February 25. George Harrison played the distinctive phrase on guitar; Floyd Cramer played it on piano for the original.

They recorded "Anna (Go to Him)" on June 17, 1963, for the BBC radio show Pop Go the Beatles. The show was broadcast on June 25.

Reception
Unterberger praised the Beatles' version in his review: "Ringo Starr faithfully [replicates] the unusual drum rhythm and hi-hat crunches. Lennon's vocal, however, added a tortured pain not present in Alexander's model, particularly when he wailed in his upper register at the conclusion of the bridges. The Beatles' backup harmony vocals, in addition, were superb, and more effective [than on Alexander's version]."

Music critic Ian MacDonald had a different view of Lennon's vocal delivery, saying it sounded like "a passionate youth grappling with a man's song". As noted in many references including Mark Lewisohn's The Beatles Recording Sessions, Lennon had a bad cold on the day of recording which had an adverse effect on his voice.

Personnel
From Ian MacDonald: Engineered by Norman Smith
 * John Lennon – vocals, acoustic rhythm guitar
 * Paul McCartney – bass, backing vocals
 * George Harrison – lead guitar, backing vocals
 * Ringo Starr – drums

title: Anna (Go to Him)


text:
User talk:HarveyNewstrom

Welcome!
Hello, HarveyNewstrom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  20:40, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:HarveyNewstrom


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Vasquez

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect - no consensus to delete, but minimal support for this as a separate article. CDC  (talk)  21:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

Mario Vasquez
Not notable tv show contestant. Some top 5 American idols have made it to WP, but this looks like redirect to American Idol. Feydey 20:40, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect -- to American Idol. - Longhair | Talk 20:56, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, there's nothing to be said about him besides that he dropped out (which is already described in American Idol article), and his name is spelled wrong here. Dcarrano 22:05, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. When he dropped out, that made him notable. -- Judson 23:01, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: nobody in particular. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:24, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable idolist. JamesBurns 09:29, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, redirect to TV show. Radiant_ >|< 11:54, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Xoloz 17:56, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Charhall

Welcome!
Hello, Charhall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  20:40, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

 * Thanks for posting a question on my talk page. Your edit was reverted because the existing links are general, while the link you added pertained to a specific person. It doesn't seem fair that a certain victim should receive her own memorial link while others do not. Regards, Sango  123  18:35, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

 * I respect your argument, but when User:Dystopos removed your link, he pointed out What Wikipedia is not in his edit summary. I believe he was referring to this. Sango  123  19:08, July 25, 2005 (UTC) (P.S. Please don't hesitate to adjust the sentence you pointed out if it doesn't seem to adhere to Neutral point of view.)
 * My reference was to item 4: Wikipedia is not a memorial. Dystopos 21:14, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

John Louis Evans

 * I'm putting the sentence back. The characterization of Evans' exocution as "tortuous" is dictionary-definition, not POV. The equally indisputable fact that it is cited by opponents of capital punishment in the United States is the main reason Evans' case is notable. Dystopos 21:14, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Ertman and Pena
Oh, I thought the photo was of both Pena and Ertman - as one lady in that photo looks exactly the same as Pena does in her individual photo. Also, by "dead" I meant that the indicated relevant subjects are dead. While the man in the photo is still alive, the point of the photo was to show the murder victims, who are dead (and therefore it is likely not possible to find a freely licensed photo of them) WhisperToMe (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charhall


text:
Chains (Cookies song)

"Chains" is a rhythm and blues song written by husband-and-wife songwriting team Gerry Goffin and Carole King. It was a hit for the American girl group the Cookies in 1962 and for the English rock band the Beatles, who recorded the song for their debut album in 1963. King recorded a solo version of "Chains" for her 1980 album Pearls: Songs of Goffin and King.

The Cookies rendition
The song was originally offered to The Everly Brothers who recorded their version in July 1962, but opted not to release it. The Cookies, who also worked as backing singers, recorded "Chains" and in late 1962, it became their first appearance in the record charts since "In Paradise" reached number nine in 1956. The single released by Dimension Records peaked at number six on Billboard's Hot R&B singles, number 17 on the Hot 100 charts, and number 4 in Canada.

In a song review for AllMusic, critic Richie Unterberger described it as: "Like several other girl group and indeed soul-pop songs of the era, it employed an irregular clapping rhythms, alternating two-claps with one-clap per measure. If that sounds like a simple formula, it's nonetheless pretty catchy, stimulating both the record's groove and making the words and melody more singable and memorable. The verses of "Chains" are R&B-tinged pop-rock, frequently bolstered by upbeat smoky sax riffs following lines of the lyric. The bridges got into a more sultry and seductive mood, sung not in unison as the verses were, but with a winsome and vulnerable lead voice poking out in front of the vocal arrangement."

Personnel
 * Earl-Jean – lead vocals
 * Margaret Ross – backing vocals
 * Dorothy Jones – backing vocals
 * Eva Boyd – backing vocals

The Beatles' version
The single by the Cookies was a popular cover song for Liverpool bands after its release in November 1962, and was included briefly in the Beatles' live sets. They recorded it on February 11, 1963 in four takes, the first proving to be the best. Lennon played the introduction on harmonica.

George Harrison sings the lead vocal on the Beatles' version and, as the fourth track from the group's first album, it represents the first time many fans heard Harrison singing lead on a commercially released song.

They played the song live on a number of BBC radio shows, including Side by Side, Here We Go and Pop Go the Beatles. Though none of those performances were included on the 1994 compilation Live at the BBC, it was eventually released on the 2013 compilation On Air – Live at the BBC Volume 2.

Personnel (from MacDonald)
 * George Harrison – lead vocals, lead guitar
 * John Lennon – rhythm guitar, harmonica, harmony vocals
 * Paul McCartney – bass, harmony vocals
 * Ringo Starr – drums
 * Norman Smith – engineering

Carole King version
In 1980, King recorded her own version of the song for her 1980 studio album Pearls: Songs of Goffin and King, consisting covers of songs King wrote with her first husband and songwriting partner, of which King co-produced with Mark Hallman. The same album also produced her last hit, "One Fine Day", which she co-wrote with Goffin and was previously a hit for the Chiffons in 1963.

French version
In 1963, the song was adapted into French by Georges Aber as "Chance" and was recorded by French pop singer Sylvie Vartan and released as a non-album single in January 1963. The song peaked at Number 33 on the French Belgian charts in June 1963. Around the same time, the French adaption was recorded by fellow singer and Vartan's future husband, Johnny Hallyday and was featured as the second track on Hallyday's 1963 studio album "Les Bras en croix" ("Arms crossed"), released that April as an album-only track.

title: Chains (Cookies song)


text:
User talk:PoLaR

Welcome!
Hello, PoLaR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  20:40, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:PoLaR


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs/Templates/Sweden

This page lists templates used for of the WikiProject on Football manual of style for clubs from Sweden.


text:
By God

By God is the third album by Christian metal group Disciple, released in 2001. It is a dual-disc; the second disc was a bonus disc for the buyer to give "to someone who needs it...". The album has been remastered and re-released just like the last album (This Might Sting a Little). The cover was changed to a different style.

Track listing
All tracks by Disciple

 * 1) "By God" – 3:48
 * 2) "Not Rock Stars" – 3:38
 * 3) "God of Elijah" – 3:10
 * 4) "Knocked Down" – 3:21
 * 5) "Blow the House Down" – 4:03
 * 6) "Coal" – 3:26
 * 7) "Can't Breathe" – 4:44
 * 8) "Salt Lamp" – 3:23
 * 9) "You Are Here" – 4:14
 * 10) "Thousand Things" – 6:03
 * 11) "99" – 2:39
 * 12) "Laugh track" – 0:20
 * 13) "Whiny Britches" – 3:18
 * 14) "You Rock My Socks Off" – 3:08
 * 15) "Trouble" (mini-sermon) – 0:15
 * 16) "Hate Your Guts" – 3:40
 * 17) "Whether They Like It Or Not" – 4:22
 * 18) "Not Since Breakfast" – 3:13
 * 19) "Sick and Tired of Being Sick and Tired" – 4:01
 * 20) "But Wait There's More" – 3:36
 * 21) "Rich Man" – 4:05
 * 22) "Sermon" (given by Kevin) – 4:10

Bonus disc track listing
 * 1) "By God" – 3:50
 * 2) "Not Rock Stars" – 3:39
 * 3) "Rich Man" – 4:01
 * 4) "Sermon" (given by Kevin) – 4:10

Personnel
Based on AllMusic credits:
 * Kevin Young – vocals, bass guitar
 * Brad Noah – guitar
 * Tim Barrett – drums
 * Travis Wyrick – producer
 * Dennis Olson – cover design

title: By God


text:
File:DuskAndHerEmbraceCover.jpg

Cradle of Filth's "Dusk And Her Embrace" album cover; sent to me from a friend over the internet.

Fair Use Rationale
 * 1) It is a low resolution copy of a CD album cover;
 * 2) It does not limit the copyright owner's rights to sell the CD album in any way;
 * 3) Copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the album artwork on another CD.
 * 4) It is to be used only on the album's page, and adjacent to discussion of said album on main band page.

title: File:DuskAndHerEmbraceCover.jpg


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs/Templates/Finland

This page lists templates used for of the WikiProject on Football manual of style for clubs from Finland.


text: User talk:69.141.251.144

title: User talk:69.141.251.144


text:
Wulin

Wulin may refer to:

Hangzhou

 * Wulin, the ancient name and chiefly literary or poetic synonym of Hangzhou
 * Wulin Lakes (武林水), the ancient name of West Lake, Hangzhou
 * Wulin Academy of Arts (武林書畫院), the art academy of Hangzhou
 * Wulin Square (武林廣場), a public square in the centre of Hangzhou

Towns in China

 * Wulin, Guangxi (武林镇), a town in Pingnan County, Guangxi, China
 * Wulin, Heilongjiang (五林镇), a town in Yangming District, Heilongjiang, China
 * Wulin, Hubei (乌林镇), a town in Honghu, Hubei

Martial arts

 * Wulin is the fictional society of Chinese martial arts heroes in Wuxia fiction. Wulin is considered a part of the broader term jianghu, which refers to the underworld of bandits and other elements that live outside the mainstream of Chinese society.

title: Wulin


text:
Talk:Jats

Add Canada as a region with a significant population
There are around 1 million people with Jat ancestry in Canada. 2605:8D80:405:6CC0:CEA:E8E1:502A:5F0D (talk) 03:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 June 2024
Add Sodhi as a Jat name Singhpbx1 (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I think, he's saying that Add Sodhi in Clan List of Jats. But without reliable sources, it wouldn't be processed.
 * Thanks & Regards Super Dud (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 June 2024
Missing “thind” in the clan section. As said here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thind 2001:569:7779:5000:6DC7:993F:2141:F3BC (talk) 23:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thx 2001:569:7779:5000:CC03:3911:7466:C79C (talk) 04:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I don’t see it, idk why 2001:569:7779:5000:CC03:3911:7466:C79C (talk) 04:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The source, you've provided isn't reliable at all, provide us a verifiable source so that we can proceed with your statement. Super Dud (talk) 05:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 June 2024
"Jats are descendants of Ham" as referenced in https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:HMElliotHistVol1.djvu/138#cite_note-1 Sachidananda Hullahalli (talk) 11:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. You'll need a more reliable source than what you've cited, particularly as Ham is generally not considered a historical figure. – macaddct1984 (talk | contribs) 14:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Recent edit
, you added a large amount of undiscussed content which has many WP:UNDUE, poorly-sourced, and misrepresented details. Your bold edit has been reverted twice already. So please propose your changes here if you must and develop WP:Consensus. Here is the summary of problems with your edit:

Let's start with your addition/source about the Jaths of Kutch. They don't belong to this article, as the source cited by you itself says that Jaths of Kutch, i.e. Daneta, Fakirani and Garasia, are distinct from the subject of this article, although they might have originated from a single group. It even uses separate spellings to distinguish them, namely "Jats" for the subjects of this article and "Jatts" for the Jaths of Kutch. Indeed, I have read multiple sources in the past that distinguish Kutch Jaths or their divisions from the subject of this article, although I could recall only two such sources at the moment. The source's author, who is not a historian, states about "Jatt pastoralists" that "some historians suggest that they were originally a single group" which eventually "crystallised into distinct ethnic groups". Note that, to support her origin-related claim about Jaths, which doesn't belong here anyway, she cites/quotes Irfan Habib's 1971 conference paper, where he doesn't even mention Kutch anywhere. So this is a historical fringe claim about Kutch Jaths by a non-historian which isn't supported by historians. In any case, such a historical fringe claim will require coverage in both tertiary scholarship (to meet WP:DUE and WP:TERTIARY) and secondary scholarship by historians (to meet WP:SCHOLARSHIP and WP:HISTAR) for it to be mentioned anywhere, let alone this article.

Second, the source cited by you to show that majority of Jats are Muslim explicitly mentions the religion-wise break-up of Jats as follows: 47% Hindus, 33% Muslims, and 20% Sikhs. The author does mention two 1980s "crude estimates" of the total Jat population without saying which one of them is accurate or what they tell about the religion-wise break-up. But he is very clear about their distribution among the religions. So you cannot WP:SYNTHESIS that source to refute its explicit claim!

Third, newspapers and conference papers are neither WP:DUE (see WP:TERTIARY) nor reliable (see WP:SCHOLARSHIP and WP:HISTAR) for caste/history-related claims. So the content based on those sources is unacceptable here unless you can replace them with mainstream secondary and tertiary scholarship.

Fourth, the details from Richard Eaton can be summarised here with attribution, although I have yet to check their coverage in tertiary scholarship about Jats. Note that Eaton's sources like this one seem like the updated versions of the source cited by you. So I will check what his latest sources mention about Jats and how his findings are summarised in the tertiary scholarship. That will help us to summarise his views here. Similarly, the details about the impact of Jats in Pakistani politics seem fine, although they need to be a bit neutral worded. I will add those or similar details after checking relevant summaries in some mainstream scholarly sources, especially the introductory ones. But you will need to wait for some days. If you want to do that quickly, please provide such tertiary scholarship by yourself.

Finally, there are thousands of pages written in both non-scholarly sources and peer-reviewed scholarly sources about the subject of this article. But only WP:DUE content is added here. Otherwise, there would have been hundreds of versions of this article.

PS: Although I am mostly sure that the editor won't edit war any more, I am pinging admin just in case. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

NitinMlk (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jats


text: User talk:129.2.18.88

title: User talk:129.2.18.88


text:
User talk:AwesomeAndrew

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks, smoddy 20:45, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:AwesomeAndrew


text:
Ask Me Why

"Ask Me Why" is a song by the English rock band the Beatles originally released in the United Kingdom as the B-side of their single "Please Please Me". It was also included on their 1963 debut album Please Please Me. It was written primarily by John Lennon and credited to the Lennon–McCartney partnership.

Composition
Written in early 1962, "Ask Me Why" is principally a John Lennon composition, but was credited to Lennon and Paul McCartney, as were all other Lennon–McCartney originals on the first pressings of Please Please Me album. McCartney said, "It was John's original idea and we both sat down and wrote it together, just did a job on it. It was mostly John's." It was part of their live act prior to their recording contract, and was one of the songs performed at their first Parlophone recording session in EMI's Abbey Road studio two on 6 June 1962. The song emulates the style of Smokey Robinson and the Miracles, by whom Lennon was influenced, and draws its opening guitar phrase from the Miracles' "What's So Good About Goodbye" (1961).

Structure
The song is in the key of E major, with some leaning to its relative minor of C#, and is in 4/4 time. Structurally, the song is complex and, as Alan Pollack states, contains three different variants of the verse. The song also contains "jazzy parallel sevenths" in most of the chords, and has a live ending.

Recording
"Ask Me Why" was originally recorded at Abbey Road studios on 6 June 1962 with drummer Pete Best. As the session was a 'commercial test', none of the performances recorded that day were deemed suitable for release, and the two quarter-inch tape reels from that session were thought to be destroyed by EMI. However, two songs survived; "Besame Mucho" and "Love Me Do" were later discovered on acetate discs. The group performed "Ask Me Why" for the BBC Light Programme's Teenager's Turn – Here We Go on 15 June 1962 recorded at the BBC Playhouse in Hulme, Manchester, nine days after the EMI session.

It was recorded again, along with "Please Please Me", on 26 November 1962 with Ringo Starr on drums. The Beatles also rehearsed "Tip of My Tongue", another Lennon and McCartney song which was also being considered for the B-side of the "Please Please Me" single. However, producer George Martin felt that "Tip of My Tongue" still needed some work, and it was eventually given to Tommy Quickly to record.

Other releases

 * Capitol Records, EMI's American counterpart to Parlophone, initially refused to distribute Beatle music in the US and so the "Please Please Me"/"Ask Me Why" single was released by Vee-Jay Records on 25 February 1963.
 * Vee-Jay included "Ask Me Why" on version 2 of Introducing... The Beatles.
 * Capitol eventually released "Ask Me Why" in 1965 on The Early Beatles when Vee-Jay's rights expired.
 * A live version from December 1962 was released on the German/UK version of Live! at the Star-Club in Hamburg, Germany; 1962 album in 1977, but was left off the initial US version.
 * A version was recorded for the BBC on 3 September 1963. It was released on On Air – Live at the BBC Volume 2 in 2013.

Cover versions
The song was covered by the Smithereens on their 2008 album B-Sides The Beatles.

Personnel
Engineered by Norman Smith
 * John Lennon – vocals, acoustic rhythm guitar
 * Paul McCartney – bass, backing vocals
 * George Harrison – lead guitar, backing vocals
 * Ringo Starr – drums
 * Personnel per Ian MacDonald

title: Ask Me Why


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs/Templates/Belgium

This page lists templates used for of the WikiProject on Football manual of style for clubs from Belgium.


text:
Mountain View–Los Altos Union High School District

The Mountain View–Los Altos Union High School District (MVLA) is a school district serving high school students in Mountain View, Los Altos, and Los Altos Hills, California. The elementary and middle school students in the region are served by the Mountain View Whisman School District and Los Altos School District.

History
Mountain View High School was founded in 1902, on Castro Street. In 1924, as enrollment increased, the school was moved to a new campus on Castro Street and the original was demolished. Moffett Field's opening in 1933 caused a further increase in enrollment. Los Altos High School was added in 1955 and Chester F. Awalt High School, named after a long-time school board trustee, was added in 1961; Mountain View High School students were diverted there for a year to allow for the remodeling of their home school.

The school district saw declining enrollment—5,200 students in 1970, compared to a projected 2,300 in the late 1980s—so the original Mountain View High School location was closed in 1981, and was demolished in 1987. Students were distributed to the other two schools; Awalt was renamed to Mountain View, while the original Mountain View High's mascot and colors were given to Los Altos High.

Los Altos High School
Los Altos High School was founded in 1956. Its school mascot is the eagle.

The 2018-19 school year had 2,227 students in attendance. The student population was 50% male and 50% female. Its racial makeup was 38% White, 26% Hispanic, 26% Asian, 7% Two or More Races and 1% Black.

A major renovation and set of new buildings was completed in 2002, and again in 2013. As of May 2020, the school is undergoing construction as part of a district-wide program to modernize classrooms.

In 1954, the land was purchased from apricot farmers to make way for the new school. The Class of 1958 was the first to graduate.

Mountain View High School
Mountain View High School was founded in 1902. Its school mascot is the Spartan.

The 2018-19 school year had 2,062 students in attendance. The student population was 51% male and 49% female. Its racial makeup was 40% White, 24% Asian, 23% Hispanic, 11% Two or More Races and 2% Black.

The school was founded at the corner of El Camino Real and Calderon Avenue in Mountain View, California. It was moved in 1924 to Castro Street in what is now downtown Mountain View, and moved again in 1981 to its current location on the corner of Truman and Bryant taking the place of Awalt High School.

Alta Vista High School
Alta Vista High School is a continuation school located at 1325 Bryant Ave., Mountain View, CA 94040.

The 2018-19 school year had 79 students in attendance. The student population was 57% male and 43% female. Its racial makeup was 72% Hispanic, 18% White, 5% Black, 3% Asian and 3% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Its student to teacher ratio, at 10.57, is well below the state average.

Since 1999, the school has been continually recognized as a Model Continuation School in the state of California.

MVLA Adult School
MVLA Adult School is an adult school located at 333 Moffett Blvd., Mountain View, CA 94043. It was accredited by the WASC in 1965.

Transportation
The school district only has one bus for transportation: a 2007 Blue Bird All American RE (unknown fuel/engine type).


text:
Talk:Jianghu

Untitled
I just redirect the stub for Wulin to this article, but I think that it would be best if someone made a separate but related article for Wulin since is does not necessarily mean the exact same as Jiang Hu.

Note
The note is in Chinese. :| -- 200.100.16.42 (talk) 03:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

The article stated that each of Gu Long's novel is set in a different Jianhu, which is not really true. Gu Long's 武林外史，多情剑客无情剑，九月鹰飞，边城浪子 and its 2 sequels are all set in the same jianhu, and share some of the same characters.

I also vaguely remember Chu Liu Xiang being mentioned in the Lu Xiao Feng series, suggesting they are from the same continuum. Can anyone verify this please?

Considering removing "Norms of the jianghu"
It was noted in a tag that this section needed sources. I tried looking for the exact list in this section without success in both English and Chinese sources. Unless someone can find a reliable source, I think this section should be removed. Iserlon (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jianghu


text:
P.S. I Love You (Beatles song)

"P.S. I Love You" is a song recorded by English rock band the Beatles in 1962. It was composed principally by Paul McCartney (credited to Lennon–McCartney), and produced by Ron Richards. The song was released in the UK on 5 October 1962 as the B-side of their debut single "Love Me Do" and is also included on their debut album Please Please Me (1963). It was later included on the American release Introducing... The Beatles (1964), its reissue The Early Beatles (1965), and the Beatles compilation album Love Songs (1977).

Recording
The version featured on the single and album was recorded in ten takes on 11 September 1962 at EMI's Abbey Road Studios, London. Producer George Martin had booked session drummer Andy White as a replacement for Pete Best, whom he considered not technically good enough for recording purposes; Martin had been unaware that the other Beatles had already replaced Pete Best with Ringo Starr, who attended the session and plays maracas on the song. White was a freelance show band and session drummer, and gave the recording a lightweight cha cha treatment.

Martin was not present at the session; in his absence, it was run by Ron Richards. Richards told the group that the song could not be the A-side of their single because of an earlier song with the same title: "I was originally a music publishing man, a plugger, so I knew someone had done a record with that title. I said to Paul, 'You can have it as B-side, but not an A-side.'"

With Starr playing drums, the Beatles recorded the song at the BBC on 25 October 1962, 27 November 1962 and 17 June 1963 for subsequent broadcast on the BBC radio programmes Here We Go, Talent Spot and Pop Go the Beatles, respectively. The 17 June 1963 recording was officially published on the On Air – Live at the BBC Volume 2 album (2013).

Composition
Written in spring 1962, while Paul McCartney was in Hamburg, this song is sometimes considered to be a dedication to his then-girlfriend Dot Rhone. However, McCartney denies this: "It's just an idea for a song really, a theme song based on a letter, like the Paperback Writer idea. It was pretty much mine. I don't think John had much of a hand in it. There are certain themes that are easier than others to hang a song on, and a letter is one of them... The letter is a popular theme and it's just my attempt at one of those. It's not based in reality, nor did I write it to my girlfriend from Hamburg, which some people think."

John Lennon commented: "That's Paul's song. He was trying to write a "Soldier Boy" like the Shirelles. He wrote that in Germany, or when we were going to and from Hamburg. I might have contributed something. I can't remember anything in particular. It was mainly his song."

Melodically typical of McCartney's later writing style, the song demonstrates two notable exceptions to the contemporaneous model: during the opening chorus the chord D♭7 is placed incongruously between G and D (on write), and during the song's title phrase a sudden shift to B♭ occurs underneath "P.S. I love you" which Ian MacDonald described as "a dark sidestep". Lennon contributes a single note harmony emphasising the beginning of each stanza. Lyrically constructed with their female audience in mind, the Beatles included it as part of their Cavern Club song set.

Re-release
On its 20th anniversary, Parlophone re-issued "P.S. I Love You" as a picture disc, and shortly afterwards as a 12-inch disc.

Personnel

 * Paul McCartney – lead vocals, bass
 * John Lennon – acoustic rhythm guitar, backing vocals
 * George Harrison – acoustic guitar, backing vocals
 * Ringo Starr – maracas
 * Andy White – drums

Engineered by Norman Smith
 * Personnel per Ian MacDonald except where noted

For the Beatles' BBC session recorded 17 June 1963 and released on the album On Air – Live at the BBC Volume 2 (2013), Starr plays drums.

title: P.S. I Love You (Beatles song)


text:
Sean Lamont

Sean Lamont (born 15 January 1981) is a Scottish former international rugby union player and now Strength and Conditioning Coach. He played at centre and on the wing. He gained 105 caps for Scotland before retiring from international rugby in 2017.

Amateur career
Lamont was born on 15 January 1981 in Perth, Scotland. He attended Sheffield Hallam University where he studied Sports Science between 1999 and 2002. Additionally whilst at Sheffield Hallam he played alongside the likes of Chris Jones (Sale and England) and Dave Strettle (Harlequins and England).

Lamont has played for Glasgow Hawks.

Professional career
In 2000 Lamont joined Rotherham and was the club’s under-21 captain in 2001. In the summer of 2003 he left Rotherham and joined Glasgow Rugby, where he went on to have a very successful first season and cemented himself as a fans' favourite at Hughenden. In the summer of 2005 Lamont joined Northampton Saints from Glasgow. Then, 13 days later, he added to his growing reputation by scoring four tries in one game against Saracens. Lamont is the first Saints player to achieve this since another Scot, Craig Moir, in 1996.

In May 2009 Lamont joined the Scarlets of Wales. He has signed for Glasgow for the 2012–13 season, joining his brother Rory at the club

In March 2017 Lamont announced his forthcoming retirement from professional rugby at the end of Glasgow's 2016-17 season. A fan petition was subsequently launched on ScotlandRugbyNews.com asking Lamont to recreate his iconic peroxide blonde hair with orange gloves, as per his breakthrough season in 2004.

International career
At the 2002 Commonwealth Games sevens tournament he represented Scotland.

Lamont earned his first cap for Scotland against Manu Samoa on their tour in the summer of 2004. On his Murrayfield debut he scored a try against the Australians in the autumn of 2004. In Scotland's 2005 Six Nations Championship match against Italy he was named man of the match.

Furthermore, Lamont helped the side to an historic victory for Scotland against the hopeful Grand Slam winners (France) in Scotland's Six Nations stunning 20–16 victory on 5 February 2006 by scoring two tries, one of which he joined a maul and used his strength and power to bundle over the line and take the Scots to victory. On 26 February 2006, he played a major part in the Scotland squad's victory over England to win the Calcutta Cup by 18–12.

Lamont was picked consistently through the 2007 Six Nations Championship for Scotland. In November 2007, Lamont suffered up a serious knee injury early on in a Saints versus Pertemps Bees match, putting him out for the rest of the season.

Despite starting in Scotlands first match of the 2009 Six Nations Championship, against Wales at Murrayfield, Lamont was dropped for the remainder of the tournament after a dip in club form was carried onto the international stage. He lost out to Thom Evans and Simon Danielli. Lamont's power and influence was missed as Scotland disappointed once again. Lamont's move to the Scarlets followed and in November 2009, under the guidance of new Scotland coach Andy Robinson, Lamont returned to the international stage. He played three November Tests, including a dramatic win over Australia at Murrayfield.

Lamont was ever present again during the 2010 Six Nations Championship as Scotland showed signs of resurgence under Andy Robinson. He also played in Scotland's notable 2–0 series win over Argentina during the Summer Internationals.

Lamont won his 100th cap in the victory over Samoa in the 2015 Rugby World Cup. He became only the second Scottish player to achieve 100 caps, after Chris Paterson (109). In March 2017 he announced his retirement from international rugby.

Coaching career
Lamont moved on to become a Strength and Conditioning Coach for the Scottish Rugby Academy.

Awards
Lamont was voted The Famous Grouse Player of the Season 2007, narrowly beating Chris Paterson, Simon Taylor and Kelly Brown to the award.

Personal life
Lamont's younger brother Rory was also a Scotland international rugby union player, with two playing together for Scotland on a number of occasions.

Lamont is married with two children.

Lamont posed nude for the 2007 edition of Dieux du Stade, the annual photo calendar and DVD produced by the French rugby club Stade Français.

title: Sean Lamont


text:
Talk:Rhode Island Route 24

RI 24 Extension
The planned freeway through Portsmouth, Middletown and Newport was part of a planned Interstate 895, not part of an extended RI 24, though RI 24 may have had an interchange with it. For this reason, I have removed the paragraph. The information contained in the deleted paragraph appears in the Interstate 895 (Rhode Island) article. --K1vsr 20:47, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Rhode Island Route 24


text:
YER

YER may refer to:
 * Yemeni rial, the currency of the Republic of Yemen
 * Fort Severn Airport, which has "YER" as its IATA airport code

title: YER


text: User talk:69.107.113.16

title: User talk:69.107.113.16