text:
XM214 Microgun

The XM214 Microgun is an American prototype 5.56 mm rotary-barreled machine gun. It was designed and built by General Electric. The XM214 was a scaled-down smaller and lighter version of the M134 Minigun, firing M193 5.56×45mm ammunition.

Development
The XM214 was first developed for aircraft applications. Later General Electric developed it into a man-portable weapon system, known as the GE Six-Pak. The complete Six-Pak system weighed 85 pounds (38.5 kg) with 1,000 rounds of ammunition, comparable in weight to some heavy machine guns. The basic gun in the Six-Pak weighed 27 pounds, or 12.2 kg. The system could be carried by a team of two soldiers and mounted either to an M122 tripod or a vehicle's pintle mount. The overall length is 104 cm, the gun only is 68.6 cm. The width (including ammunition case) is 44.4 cm. Sighting was usually by optical telescope.

The Six-Pak consisted of the XM214, the power module, and the ammunition module consisted of two 500-round, factory packed, and disposable cassettes mounted to a holding rack. Linked ammunition was fed through a flexible chute to the gun; when the first cassette was empty, ammunition would then feed from the second cassette, tripping a visible signal that a new cassette needed to be added to the rack.

The power module contained a 24-volt nickel-cadmium battery, a 0.8 hp motor, and solid-state electronic controls. Unless the battery was plugged into a vehicle's power supply, the battery's charge would be depleted after 3,000 rounds. The system could be broken down quickly into two portable loads of roughly 42 lb apiece. This was accomplished by means of a quick-release fitting at that end of the belt chute fastened to the gun.

Electronic controls contained a burst limiter and handled the automatic clearing of the gun after bursts. Using the electronic controls, the weapon's rate of fire could be adjusted from 400 rpm all the way up to 4,000 rpm. Later editions of Jane's Infantry Weapons claimed a theoretical cyclic rate of up to 6,000 rpm. George Chinn, author of The Machine Gun Volume V, contended that the XM214 prototype had a rate of fire of up to 10,000 rpm, but the man-portable Six-Pak was limited to 4,000 rpm. General Electric tested it successfully at 12,000 rpm.

Microgun Pod
An 88 by 10 inch (224 x 25 cm) 5.56mm Microgun Pod was also developed for external use on light aircraft and helicopters. The unit had an ammunition capacity of 1,500 to 3,500 rounds and a loaded weight of 186 to 300 lb. The feeding system was linkless via a helical drum and had a nominal rate of fire of 6,000 rpm. Adjustments to 1,000 or 10,000 rpm were possible if desired. Power could be provided by a built-in battery pack or from the aircraft itself.

Promotion and reception
The ability to fire the 5.56 mm round used by the M16 rifle was the major selling point for the Microgun. With a fast-firing gun using standard rifle ammunition, the US Army and US Air Force showed interest for use of the XM214 on aircraft, helicopters, and armored vehicles. The smaller and lighter Microgun could replace the Minigun on heavily armed gunship aircraft and attack helicopters, freeing up space for ammo, equipment, and even more guns. Certain small aircraft that could not handle the larger Miniguns could be given the XM214 in a 300 lb pod. General Electric pitched the weapon to the US Navy for use on riverine craft. Company engineers proposed many mounting arrangements including open doors, in an aircraft's wings or nose, putting half a dozen guns in a modified bomb bay, and even in turrets of an automated defense network. However, the Microgun's prominent feature of using 5.56 mm ammunition was also its downfall. For aircraft gunners, accuracy suffered at high speeds, and range, compared to the 7.62 mm Minigun, was limited. General Electric tried to refocus its efforts by making the Microgun an infantry weapon, but the Army showed no interest.

title: XM214 Microgun


text:
User talk:Masoud sheykhi

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Poli (talk • contribs) 03:43, 2005 July 26 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Masoud sheykhi


text:
User talk:Stu rock

Welcome!
Hi,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the five pillars of Wikipedia. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and the FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page. ---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
 * If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing.
Link 03:45, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stu rock


text:
House of Yi

The House of Yi, also called the Yi dynasty (also transcribed as the Lee dynasty), was the royal family of the Joseon dynasty and later the imperial family of the Korean Empire, descended from the Joseon founder Yi Seong-gye. All of his descendants are members of the Jeonju Yi clan.

After the Japan–Korea Treaty of 1910, in which the Empire of Japan annexed the Korean Peninsula, some members of the Jeonju Yi clan were incorporated into the Imperial House of Japan and the Japanese peerage by the Japanese government. This lasted until 1947, just before the Constitution of Japan was promulgated. The treaty was nullified in the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea.

With the Constitution succeeding to the Provisional Government, the descendants of the Imperial Family continue to be given preference and constitute a favored symbol in South Korea. The July 2005 funeral of Yi Ku, former head of the royal household, attracted considerable media coverage. Yi Seok also caught attention as of the 100th anniversary of Korean independence on March 1, 2019.

Early Era (15th century)
When Taejo of Joseon ascended to the throne in 1392, he continued to use the laws of Goryeo, and the noble titles he gave to his sons, nephews, and sons-in-law were all "prince" (군). After the coup d'état in 1398, the system of noble titles changed: "duke" for king's sons, "marquis" for royal descendants, and "earl" for officers of senior first rank. This system was abolished in 1401 to avoid "usurping" the existing title laws of the more powerful Ming dynasty.

As of 1412, Taejong of Joseon approved a new system for giving titles to the royalty: among the sons of a king, those who were born by the queen can acquire the title "grand prince" (대군), and the rest can be the "prince" (군); both princes are of senior first rank and their male descendants are as well insofar as their great-grandsons can retrieve official positions. According to the Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty, the title "prince" (군) was at first restricted to be given to sons or grandsons of kings, but these standards became looser over time. Generally, a royal eligible to be a prince could not receive the title automatically even if his rank raised him to the junior second rank. But such a hereditary title could be passed down to generations until it exceeds more than four generations (from the king).

Similar to male royals, female royals received titles according to their kinship to the kings. Despite all being called "princess" in English, daughters of the king and queen were called 공주 (gongju). Girls born to other consorts and fathered by the king were called 옹주 (ongju) to differentiate; some further distant female royalties also had different titles. If the above-mentioned females were stripped of titles due to various reasons, they would be referred to as a commoner; for instance, the eldest daughter of deposed Yeonsangun of Joseon was addressed as "Ku Mun-gyeong's wife" after 1506. Later, there were also so-called "Kim Se-ryung's wife" (former Princess Hyomyeong) and "Jeong's wife" (former Princess Hwawan).

Middle Era
In 1469, Seongjong of Joseon ascended to the throne as the adopted heir to his uncle, Yejong of Joseon. As of 1475, Seongjong asked the Ming dynasty government to ratify his biological father, Crown Prince Uigyeong, to have a posthumous status as a king, and a temple name "Deokjong" was made for the late crown prince. A similar event took place in 1568, when Seonjo of Joseon succeeded the throne as the adopted heir to his half-uncle, Myeongjong of Joseon. Based on official advice, instead of giving his biological father (Prince Deokheung) a title of "king" posthumously, Seonjo created a new title for him in 1569, Deokheung Daewongun (덕흥대원군), as an honor to the late prince. This action had a precedent in 1066, when Emperor Yingzong of Song promoted his biological father (Zhao Yunrang) without posthumously elevating him to the status of emperor.

Following the precedent by Seonjo, three more royals were designated as Daewongun throughout the Joseon history: Prince Jeongwon (1623, but later promoted to "King Wonjong" as of 1634"); Yi Kwang (Jeongye Daewongun, 1849); and Prince Heungseon (1864).

In 1650, Hyojong of Joseon, as requested by the prince regent Dorgon of the Qing dynasty, adopted a fourth cousin once removed as his daughter. Unusually, he gave her title, Princess Uisun, before she was about to leave Joseon to marry Dorgon.

Gojong and Sunjong / Korean Empire (1863–1896, 1897–1910)
After the Meiji Restoration, Japan acquired Western military technology. With this power, it forced Joseon to sign the Japan–Korea Treaty of 1876 after the Ganghwa Island incident. It established a strong economic presence on the peninsula, heralding the beginning of Japanese imperial expansion in East Asia. In the 19th century tensions mounted between China and Japan, culminating in the First Sino-Japanese War; much of this war was fought on the Korean Peninsula. The Chinese defeat in the 1894 war resulted in the Treaty of Shimonoseki, which officially guaranteed Korea's independence from China. However, the treaty effectively granted Japan direct control over Korean politics.

The Joseon court, pressured by encroachment from larger powers, tried to reinforce national integrity and declared the Korean Empire in 1897. King Gojong of Korea assumed the title of Emperor in order to assert Korea's independence; he gave himself the rank of the leaders of China and Japan. In addition, Korea sought modern military technology from other foreign powers, especially Russia, in order to fend off the Japanese. Technically, 1895 marks the end of the Joseon period, as the official name of the state was changed. But the dynasty continued, although Japan intervened in its affairs. For example, the 1895 assassination of the queen consort, Queen Min, is believed to have been orchestrated by Japanese general Miura Gorō. The queen had great influence on politics during the reign of her husband, and she tried to maintain the neutrality of the country by accepting the offers from the Russian Empire, allowing the latter to have greater influence. After the death of the queen, the emperor honored her by posthumously promoting her status to empress (Empress Myeongseong).

As an emperor, Gojong granted higher titles to some of his close relatives, and so did his successor Sunjong of Korea. In 1900, Gojong designated his younger son Yi Kang as Prince Imperial Ui (의친왕) and Yi Un as Prince Imperial Yeong (영친왕). Yi Seon, their older half brother who died young in 1880, was posthumously designated in 1907 as Prince Imperial Wan (완친왕). Gojong designated his (biological) elder brother Yi Jae-myeon as Prince Imperial Heung (흥친왕) in 1910.

After a long-term process of controlling the puppet state, on 22 August 1910, Japan annexed the Korean peninsula effectively ended rule by the House of Yi, forcing the nation to accede to the Japan–Korea Treaty of 1910. According to the treaty, some of the members of Yi family were incorporated into the royal family (王公族) or made Korean nobles (朝鮮貴族).

The Korean nobility titles granted by Japan in 1910, listing only those from Jeonju Yi clan, are as follows:

Japanese colonial rule and Post-liberation
Emperor Gojong had nine sons, but only three princes who survived to adulthood: the second son, Crown Prince Yi Cheok; the fifth son, Yi Kang, and the seventh son, Yi Un. The Crown Prince, Yi Cheok, became Emperor Sunjong, the last monarch of the Korean Empire. Since Emperor Sunjong never had issue, his younger brother, Yi Un, the Prince Imperial Yeong became the new Imperial Crown Prince. Yi Kang (Prince Imperial Ui) might have taken the position due to his seniority but was passed over - due to the low status of Yi Kang's biological mother, Lady Chang, as well as the notorious fame of Yi Kang himself known not only domestically but also internationally. Yi Kang fathered 13 sons and 9 daughters by 14 mistresses; the number can be different based on difference sources. With an extremely wide range of historical evaluations over him — womanizer, as well as a behind-the-scene leader of the independence movement — the Japanese authorities limited the activities of the prince throughout the occupation.

Emperor Sunjong died in 1926, Crown Prince Yi Un was called "King Yi", a nominal title because the country had already lost its sovereignty to Japan. Yi Un married a Japanese princess, Princess Masako of Nashimoto, who was later known as Yi Bangja, a family member of the shinnōke (cadet branch from the Imperial House of Japan). After they married, Princess Masako gave birth to Yi Jin in 1921 (died young) and Yi Ku in 1931.

Many members of the Korean imperial family lived in Japan during colonial rule. The last princess of Korea Deokhye, was taken to Japan at a young age, she later married the Japanese count and politician Sō Takeyuki. During the Second World War, princes of the Korean imperial family served as officers of the Imperial Japanese Army. Crown Prince Yi Un achieved the rank of Lieutenant General, commanded Japanese forces in China and became a member of the Supreme War Council. Prince Yi Geon, the first son of Yi Kang, served as a cavalry officer, achieved the rank of Colonel at the end of the war and lived the remainder of his life in Japan. Prince Yi U, the second son of Yi Kang, served as a General Staff Officer with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel when he was killed in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima.

After Korea's liberation in 1945, President Syngman Rhee suppressed the imperial family, in order to prevent the restoration of the monarchy, as he feared that its return would challenge his emerging authority as the new republic's founding father. (Ironically Rhee himself was of the House of YI; Rhee's family traced its lineage back to King Taejong of Joseon, and was a 16th-generation descendant of Grand Prince Yangnyeong. ) Rhee seized and nationalized most of the family's properties, and the imperial family was also blamed on being responsible for the "collapse of the nation". According to the prince's 11th son, Yi Seok, his mother, Hong Chongsun, was forced to sell noodles as a street vendor to make a living. Stripped of most of their wealth and authority, some family members fled to the United States and Latin America, known descendants reside in New Jersey and New York. For instance, Amy Lee (Yi Haegyeong), the fifth daughter of Yi Kang, migrated to the United States in 1956 and worked for 27 years as a librarian at Columbia University in New York City. In September, 2012, she was 82 years old and described as "one of the last survivors of the Korean royal court". Among Prince Yi Kang's surviving four sons and seven daughters, four lost touch with the family after they left for the United States. The other family members held an ancestral ritual twice a year for Prince Yi Kang, but usually only two or three of the 11 surviving siblings attended the ceremonies.

Meanwhile, the Jeonju Lee Royal Family Association was founded in 1957, and the members consist of the descendants of the royal family from various cadet branches of the clan. It was only in 1963 that a new president, Park Chung Hee, allowed some of the imperial family members, including Princess Deokhye, to return to Korea. However, they could only stay at Nakseon Hall, a small residence in a corner of Changdeokgung in Seoul; the place was previously reserved for widowed queen/empress dowagers. Yi Un also became the director of the Jeonju Lee Royal Family Association, on 29 July 1966; the title would later pass down to his son in 1973. Yi Un died seven years later, in 1970, after a long illness resulting from strokes.

Yi Un's son, Yi Ku, was forced by other family members to divorce his American wife, Julia Mullock, in 1982 due to her sterility (the couple, however, had an adopted daughter). In 1998, it was reported that Yi Kang's eighth son died alone in a social center in eastern Seoul. Yi Seok, as mentioned above, became a lecturer at the Jeonju University as of 2005. A series of business failures left Yi Ku out of support, and he died alone at the Grand Prince Hotel Akasaka in Tokyo on July 16, 2005. The site of the hotel had been his birthplace 74 years prior. According to the Jeonju Lee Royal Family Association,  the last meeting, on July 10, was made between the association and Yi Ku, who allowed Yi Won, his first cousin once removed (grandson of Prince Yi Kang and his father is Yi Gap, 9th son of Yi Kang), to be his heir, and he signed as the proof of his permission, through the process of traditional adoption to his line. Yi Ku had met Yi Won several times before the adoption, satisfied about his foreign language abilities, and Yi Won was therefore chosen to be his successor and the status was confirmed by the association as of 22 July 2005. Although, the adoption would be invalid by present Korean Law because Yi Ku died before the adoption process was completed.

After the death of Yi Ku, a dispute about the head of the royal family occurred. Yi Hae-won, second daughter of Yi Kang and a half-aunt of Yi Won, also made a counter-claim as the "Empress of Korea" in a private ceremony organized by her followers in a hotel room. She was enthroned as symbolic monarch of Korea on 29 September 2006 by a group called "Korean Imperial Family Association". She laid claim to the title of Empress of Korea and declared the restoration of Imperial House in her own succession ceremony in a hotel room. The private enthronement was not approved or supported by Korean politics. Yi Hae-won eventually died on 8 February 2020, aged 100.

Meanwhile, in 2005–06, Yi Seok, the 10th son of Yi Kang and a half-uncle of Yi Won, claimed that he was officially named heir apparent as [the late] Crown Princess Yi Bangja (the mother of Yi Ku and the wife of Yi Un) wrote a will, naming him as the "first successor”. As such, Yi Seok is referred as "king," "prince," and/or "last pretender" by some articles from mainstream media. Later, American Internet entrepreneur Andrew Lee, accepted a nomination by Yi Seok, on 6 October 2018, to become the "Crown Prince" of Korea. Currently, South Korea has no monarchist organizations that associated with the House of Yi, demanding to replace the South Korean republic with a monarchy.

House of Yi family tree
– – – – – – - The dashed lines denote the adoptions

title: House of Yi


text:
Category:Thai art

The art of Thailand.

title: Category:Thai art


text:
User talk:Eleusinian

Welcome!
Hi,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the five pillars of Wikipedia. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and the FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page. ---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
 * If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing.
Link 03:45, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

 * It's a welcome template for new Wikipedians. I just go through Recent Changes and post this on all logged-in Wikipedians' red talk pages. Of course, this might accedentally find someone who isn't new at all, but just has a red talk page. Oh well. :P Link 21:47, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd just stub it. If it had falso info, or vandalism, then yes, I'd VfD it. But even articles like the one you pointed out have potential. All it requires is some effort. (Oh, and WP:DP has a list of types of pages that do or don't need deletion) Link 18:20, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UWIRE

A tag has been placed on UWIRE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of UWIRE for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UWIRE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/UWIRE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eleusinian


text:
User talk:Jeans 4484

unique or not
Could yu kindly tell us, whether the first names of Thai royals are unique: are any of them a person whose first name is (and has) not been used by anyone else? Is there any other Bhumibol than the king himself? Are there any other Sirikit than the queen herself? Are there any other Tipangkorn than the litle prince? Are there, or have there been, any other Chulalongkorn than the late great king? Do Thai people have usual first names, or are all those different, personal? Looking forward to your response. 217.140.193.123 18:32, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Is Sirikit a totally unique first name in Thailand? no one else using it, ever?

srirasmi the princess consort
What was Srirasmi's surname, as commoner. I presume it was not Mahidol and it was not Ayuddhia, was it. And, is her first name very common in Thailand? 217.140.193.123 21:46, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Shanel 05:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

It looks like you've been here for awhile though. Sorry it took so long for you to be welcomed! :)--Shanel 05:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Queen Sirikit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Queen Sirikit.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 14:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Mahidol Adulyadej.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mahidol Adulyadej.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cohesion ★ talk 08:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Royal Staff2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Royal Staff2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 20:24, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Great Crown of Victory.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Great Crown of Victory.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 23:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Chulabhorn Walailak.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chulabhorn Walailak.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 00:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Chut-tanprakorn.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chut-tanprakorn.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 08:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jeans 4484


text:
User talk:Chuck Hartford

Welcome!
Hi,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the five pillars of Wikipedia. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and the FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page. ---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
 * If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing.
Link 03:46, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chuck Hartford


text:
User talk:Cappy~enwiki

Welcome!
Hi,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the five pillars of Wikipedia. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and the FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page. ---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
 * If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing.
Link 03:47, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Cappy. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Cappy~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cappy~enwiki


text:
User talk:Oddorange

Welcome!
Hi,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the five pillars of Wikipedia. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and the FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page. ---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
 * If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing.
Link 03:47, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oddorange


text:
John Bolton (illustrator)

John Bolton (born 23 May 1951) is a British comic book artist and illustrator most known for his dense, painted style, which often verges on photorealism. He was one of the first British artists to come to work in the American comics industry, a phenomenon which took root in the late 1980s and has since become standard practice.

Biography
Born 23 May 1951 in London, England, Bolton's introduction to comics came about quite casually after he graduated from East Ham Technical College (whose former alumni include Gerald Scarfe, Barry Windsor-Smith and Ralph Steadman) with a degree in graphics and design.

His first works in Great Britain were for magazines like Look In (alongside other British talents such as Arthur Ranson, Angus P. Allan and Jim Baikie), The House of Hammer, and Warrior (edited by Dez Skinn).

In 1981 Marvel Comics' editor Ralph Macchio noticed his work and called him to work for an adaptation of Kull of Valusia for Marvel Preview. After illustrating two Kull stories, Bolton began working on the historical-fantasy character Marada, written by Chris Claremont (author of X-Men). This was published in Epic Illustrated in black-and-white, and then coloured as a Marvel Graphic Novel.

After another fantasy series, Black Dragon (1985), the duo Claremont & Bolton produced some short stories about X-Men's lives for X-Men Classic. This represented the first introduction of Bolton to the world of superheroes. In this period Bolton worked on covers for Eclipse and Pacific publishers, and on the graphic novel Someplace Strange, written by Ann Nocenti (1988).

Horror
From 1989 Bolton devoted himself to horror, his favourite genre. Apart from a great number of covers for Dark Horse Comics and adaptations of horror movies, the main work of this period is his collaboration with writer Clive Barker (including the Hellraiser comic book version).

In 1990 Bolton worked on the first episode of The Books of Magic for DC Comics, written by Neil Gaiman. The physical appearance of the protagonist, Timothy Hunter, is that of Bolton's eldest son. In other comic books he has also portrayed his wife and sons.

In 1995 Bolton produced art for the Man-Bat mini-series, written by Jamie Delano for DC Comics. Bolton said he accepted only because the story pivoted on a villain, instead of Batman, who he considered too winning a character.

Later Bolton worked on another Batman book, Batman/Joker: Switch. His latest works include User, written by Devin Grayson, Menz Insana, a mad trip by Christopher Fowler, and Gifts of the Night by Paul Chadwick.

In other media
In 2003, author Neil Gaiman directed A Short Film About John Bolton where the painter (played by John O'Mahony) is interviewed by a reporter seeking to answer "Where do your ideas come from?" The artist is portrayed as very soft-spoken and reclusive, somewhat of a reluctant local celebrity in Crouch End, London. Bolton himself plays a guest interviewed at a gallery showing.

title: John Bolton (illustrator)


text:
Template:MCOTMnew

Support

Comments

title: Template:MCOTMnew


text:
User:Nlho

Also known as HonL to some people, nlho is reading his PhD in Computer Science in Penn State University in Penn State University at University Park. Only a few people know his name in Chinese: 何毅林. His new blog is located at 150cents.blogspot.com.

Background
Education in Singapore and Hong Kong (now become an SAR in China ).

Goals in Life
 What is Life???

Links

 * Bloglines
 * Friendster
 * Oasis Boardgame Cafe
 * Schemers Inc

title: User:Nlho


text:
Talk:House of Yi

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Korean Imperial Household → House of Yi — This article should be moved to House of Yi similarly as other royal families(see Category:Royal families). Additionaly, Yi family are not an imperial family in most years, they are an imperial family just only in 1897-1910. Mochi 02:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Survey
Add  * Support   or   * Oppose   on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~.
 * Support. Olessi 04:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination. -  AjaxSmack    05:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Discussion
Add any additional comments:

 * I'm kind of neutral on this one; the KIH is arguably just a subset of the House of Yi (namely, the post-1907 House of Yi), which therefore maybe should have its own article. The current article really only deals with the KIH; for this to sit comfortably at "House of Yi," it would need considerable expansion.  Perhaps even better would be a general article on the Jeonju Yi embracing both the royal and non-royal branches of that lineage.  Also, Category:House of Yi notwithstanding, the suggested name is very unusual.  Given the general divergence between Eastern and Western naming conventions WRT monarchy, it might be better to find a name that is more suited to the Korean context.  -- Visviva 08:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removed Fix Notices
The first was requiring citation which has since come to pass. The second was regarding recentism, but it was from 2012. The issues of controversy have cleared themselves up. The US Ambassador to Korea recognizes Yi Seok as the King as does korea.net, the Republic of Korea owned website. Finally, he's appeared on many recent talk shows as the Crown which is titled King as it was demoted from Emperor after the Korean Empire ended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoneyihistorian (talk • contribs) 04:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Male primogeniture?
Good luck with that, Gangists. Gojong himself was not first in line by male primogeniture, and that is not a rule that has been used to select Korean rulers historically - just as well, or Korea might have ended up like certain European monarchies, with a string of incompetent corrupt rulers. Those did occur, of course, but there are also allowances in the Korean system for selecting the most competent or most appropriate for the times monarch. Gojong's selection certainly helped diminish the power of certain noble clans who had become overly influential and corrupt. --Dan (talk) 17:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Also, the section on known descendants would be helped if it were clarified that Prince Imperial Ui is Yi Gang, referred to in the "Gangist" section, and three of the pretenders (Yi Seok, Yi Chung, and Yi Haewon, who conducted an odd crowning ceremony for herself shortly after the old Crown Prince died) are Yi Gang descendants. --Dan (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

The descendants of Yi Gang have another slight problem as well, according to Christopher Buyers (see Royal Ark), which is ignored in the article. To wit, "All but the two eldest sons of Prince Ui were considered illegitimate, and their names not recorded in the Yi Family Register (Chonju Yi-ssi chokpo) (see Jokbo) when born. Princess Consort Yonwon subsequently arranged for their adoption by collateral relatives of the Yi clan. The princess could have adopted one or more of these sons herself, thereby retaining them within the Imperial Family and conferring certain rights of succession to the throne. However, and for her own reasons, she seems to have avoided this option entirely. The consequence of the adoptions is that the natural children of Prince Ui belong to their adopted families and not to the Imperial line. They do not enjoy rights of succession to the throne. They are also ineligible for adoption again during their own lifetimes, and cannot regain entry into the Imperial line by such means. This effectively rules out any legitimate claim to the throne by Yi Seok or his siblings. On the other hand, their children and descendants remain eligible for adoption into the principal Imperial family line, so long as they have also not previously been adopted once during their own lifetimes. Prince Yi Kang may also have had additional natural issue to those listed here. Included amongst them, possibly two sons born to an American woman, while he was a student at the Ohio Wesleyan University. The mother and sons arrived in Tokyo ca. 1919 claiming his paternity, but their subsequent history remains unknown." --Dan (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Requested move, again

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved The proposed title is indeed the official name, but the current title is the WP:COMMONNAME Alpha Quadrant    talk    20:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

House of Yi → Korean Imperial Household — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC) There's no reason for making title of this article as same form as other articles in Category:Royal families. Because every Imperial Households have its own characteristics. And its own name is 황실(literally, Imperial Household). So it is called 대한제국의 황실(literally, Korean Imperial Household or Imperial Household of the Korean Empire) generally, not 이왕가(literally, House of Yi), which is a word from Japanese Empire. --Alphanis (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Survey
Add  * Support   or   * Oppose   on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~.

 * Support: This is POV. although it is during short period, Korean Imperial is Imperial in East Asia. Thus, re-change name to 'Korean Imperial Household'. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose "English is what we speak"; we do not title articles because such-and-such is "correct in Korean"; any more than we move articles on the Korean Wikipedia about English or Australian cities to "what is correct in English". Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Support In accordance with official orthography --Altostratus (talk) 06:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * What does that mean? Also see WP:OFFICIALNAMES, WP:USEENGLISH, WP:USECOMMONNAMES, and WP:VERIFIABILITY.  —   AjaxSmack   03:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, sir. Name 'House of Yi' is same 'Yi(Lee) Family'(..). And current title is JPOV, isn't it? --Idh0854 (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose without evidence of English usage. Current title reflects the usage of other royal families' articles at Wikipedia.  —   AjaxSmack   03:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Please see Japan–Korea Treaty of 1904. That was a official treaty between Korea and Japan. Although it was confirmed to be "already null and void" by this, we can see the term Imperial House (And Imperial Household, see Discussion) is being used generally, not House of Yi. --Alphanis (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose - House of Yi follows general naming. WikiManOne 23:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, sir. What is the rationale behind your opinion? House is not mean that 'Imperial Household' or 'Royal Household'. Never 'House of Yi' is not general mean. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm Japanese, that's how its mentioned in textbooks there. :) WikiManOne 17:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry? Is 'textbook' mean in japan? If this is right, I am able to rebut your opinion. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It absolutely does. If that was a rebut of my opinion, that's fine, wasn't very convincing, and I don't particularly like being badgered. I note that your proposal is currently failing in votes so it might just be useless anyway. WikiManOne 16:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Japanese textbook cannot be a source to prove its general naming. It can be a source for local naming of Japan only. --Alphanis (talk) 21:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Support House of Yi was just used in Japanese colonial period. After the independence from Japan, They restored their name as the "Korean Imperial Household".--Historiographer (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Support House of Yi is meant Yi(Lee) Family. This is not meant the Jeonju Yi clan. --Knight2000 (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Support --221.140.194.140 (talk) 09:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose "House" is the extended family. "Household" is the palace administration, e.g. Imperial Household Agency. From looking at the hits, this is the common rule for Korea as well. Although not every source does it this way, we are, after all, making fine distinctions here. The other royal and imperial families are all done as "House of XXXXX" on Wiki. To put the word "imperial" in the title gives them a status as pretenders, which IMO lends credibility to a strictly crank POV. Kauffner (talk) 14:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not appropriate to generalize this title as other imperial families, because of particularity of statistic of Korean surnames. You can see there are only few surnames in Korea, and over 6 million people have surname "Yi". --Alphanis (talk) 11:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Support Seeing the Korean Wikipedia. They adopted term as the Korean Imperial Household in place of House of Yi, which is used by Japanese wikipedia.--Aocduio (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Discussion
Add any additional comments:

I have doubts about this one. The two terms are not synonymous, and the better topic appears to be the one reflected by the current name. No vote as yet, interested to see what arguments emerge. Andrewa (talk) 23:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

About Septentrionalis' opinion, I want to say that it is not appropriate to title this article House of Yi, in English (not in Korean sense), because there are SO many Houses of Yi that it is confusing with other Yis. --Alphanis (talk) 04:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Please refer to The Second Annual Report on Reforms and Progress in Korea (1908-9). You can see the preview on google. --Alphanis (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

'House of Yi' is same 'Yi(Lee) Family'. This is meant 'surname Yi'. This is not meant 'the Jeonju Yi clan'. --Knight2000 (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

My House is 'House of Yi', not 'the Jeonju Yi clan'. My House is 'the Gyeongju Yi clan'. 'the Jeonju Yi clan' is similar to 'Yi de/von Jeonju'. For example, 'Yi Seong-gye' is similar to 'Seong-gye Yi de/von Jeonju'. OK? --Knight2000 (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Objection!
Excuse me, sir. I objection for result of the up-talk. On what basis do you make such a statement?(For "the current title is the WP:COMMONNAME"). 'House of Yi' is Japan notation, for demotion the meaning of the Korean Imperial family. This name little use the other language, except for Japan. How do you think about this? Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Because that was what the consensus was. The result was not move, not too hard to understand is it? It doesn't matter why its the common name, what matters it that it is. If reliable sources all started to called the the KKK the Murder League, we would probably rename it after a few years of that. WMO Please leave me a wb if you reply 03:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. "House of Yi" is not meant 'the Jeonju Yi clan' in Korea. --210.108.110.35 (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Umm.. Sorry. "House of Yi" is not common name, except in Japan. And 'Korean Imperial Household' is unlike the 'KKK', no comparison with 'Korean Imperial Household'. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 08:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Rock-solid datation ?
In this page, four dates are given for each of the 26 rulers of the Joseon Dynasty : birth, enthronement, retirement, death. These data are missing in some of the 26 individual pages "xxx_of_Joseon". Obviously, anyone can modify these pages to add the missing material, and I can do that technical job. But before, I would prefer to be sure of these data: citations would be great to secure the information ! Pldx1 (talk) 18:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

The current pretender
Prince Yi Seok has been covered as the Korean pretender by BBC, Washington Post, and New York Times. This article puts WP:UNDUE focus on three other pretenders, none of whom have received any international press coverage whatsoever. Kauffner (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Only one of these sources calls him the 'Pretender', or the 'Last pretender' to be precise whatever that is supposed to mean. I don't even know on what basis Yi Seok claims he is the heir. - dwc lr (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Did you read the stories? The BBC story says, "But among all the men who could be living the life of a king, the most colourful career path belongs to Yi Seok". Chosun Ilbo called him "last prince". Literally speaking, there are other surviving Yi princes. So this phrase must be understand as a euphemism for pretender. Kauffner (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * So it does. Yi Seok receives more (English) press I imagine because of his 'colourful career path' as the BBC puts it; when compared to Yi Won. But this does not make him the legitimate claimant. Yi Won was appointed by members of the Family Foundation and was the chief mourner at Yi Ku's funeral. I have no idea how Yi Seok regards himself as the rightful claimant. - dwc lr (talk) 00:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It is not our place to interpret the succession rules. The sources present Yi Seok as the pretender, so that is what should be presented here. Here is another source. Kauffner (talk) 01:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Sources present Yi Won as claimant as well so we have a dispute which should be noted not suppressed. We have no idea what Korean sources say and who is more active and so on. - dwc lr (talk) 01:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * There are defiantly Korean sources on Yi Won. Look for 황사손 이원. - dwc lr (talk) 01:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

That's a lot of hits, isn't it? As I understand it, the man goes around to the palaces, puts on a mortarboard, sits in a little yellow tent, and holds court.. Looks pretty silly to me, but for Koreans he is obviously a more plausible pretender than Yi Seok. I guess The New York Times was out of its depth on this one. Kauffner (talk) 13:58, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think Yi Seok has ever claimed to be a pretender. He is a titular prince and that is all. As for Yi Won, whatever the disputes with the succession with Yi Haewon, he was appointed as head of the royal household and theoretically titular emperor/crown prince/pretender or whatever you wish to call it. His activities therefore relate to that, including the annual Royal Ancestral Rites where he takes the place of the emperor (his 'mortarboard' that you are referring to is a crown in the Chinese pattern that has evolved in form, etc but that's a whole new topic in itself) which is appropriate given that he is legitimately performing sacrifices to his real ancestors and not some actor hired in to do so. --Charlie Huang 【遯卋山人】 13:19, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Issues about Yi Chung
As we accept the rules of genealogy in Joseon dynasty, Yi Chung cannot be the genealogical heir of the Imperial household. King Gojong rose to the throne by posthumous adoption to Prince Hyomyung at 1863, so by de jure genealogical tree his real father Heungseon Daewongun is second cousin (Daewongun's father Namyeongun was posthumously adopted as son of Eunsingun, half-brother of King Jeongjo.) of him. Mintz0223 (talk) 06:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * There were certainly people who questioned the idea of posthumous adoption at the time. See JoongAng Daily. When the monarchy was in place, such adoptions could be validated by the king. In modern times, we have only the clan genealogy to go by. What would happen if we were to reject Yi Won's posthumous adoption by Yi Gu? Yi Gang had two legitimate children, Yi Geon (1909-1990) and Yi U (1912-1945), who was killed in the Hiroshima bombing.

 * Two of Yi Geon sons were accepted as legitimate by the clan council, namely Yi Chung/이충/Tadahisa Matsudaira (1932-2006) and Yi Gi/이기/Kinya Matsudaira (b. 1935). Yi Geon divorced his first wife in 1951 because he thought Tadahisa was another man's son. Meanwhile, Kinyi was adopted by his step maternal grandfather, according to Korean Wiki. The council contacted Tadahisa about the succession in 2005. He told them, 'It has nothing to do with me.' Since Yi Geon disinherited Tadahisa, this property in Seoul presumably went to Kinyi and Yi Geon's other offspring. It was auctioned off in 2015.

 * As for Yi U, he was the legitimate second son of Yi Gang. But he was adopted by Prince Yi Jun-yong. His eldest son was Yi Cheong (이청, b. 1936). In contrast, Yi Seok (이석, b. 1941), the prince who gets so much publicity, was the illegitimate tenth son of Yi Gang and was also adopted into another line.

 * In short, no one has a valid claim to succeed at this point, although Yi Cheong is the closest thing to a dynastic heir that exists. 99to99 (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Request sources
Hi. I am improving The Arabic article of Joseon and I Just miss the sources to write a small paragraph about the Royalty. Could someone please notes some English sources about the royal family, its origin, sub-clans, and General information? Thank you.--Sayom (talk) 20:53, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I will work on adding sources. Theoneyihistorian (talk) 03:44, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Explaining the current heir
The current heir is Yi Seok. The explanation is all available via public sources. Here is the breakdown:
 * Yi Gu (death 2005) is the undisputed heir from Yi Un (death 1970).
 * Upon the death fo Yi Gu, the next in-line would have been Yi Gap, who did not take a position.
 * Yi Cheung is not a candidate as Yi Wu had passed long before Yi Gang (Prince Ui).
 * Yi Won was not born to a Lady/Wife and thus ruling him out of the crown.
 * Yi Won attempted to state he was adopted posthumously by Yi Gu, but this was in 2005 and was already illegal by Korean Law.
 * Thus, either Yi Gap would be considered from 2005-2014 and Yi Seok from 2014-present or Yi Seok from 2005-present.
 * Considering Yi Gap did not take any position, he effectively was not involved so the correct answer is Yi Seok from 2005-present. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoneyihistorian (talk • contribs) 17:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yi Haewon could not be considered since she is female and Korean goes by Confucian rules. Theoneyihistorian (talk) 17:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

 * Although this thread is old, I find it necessary to object this one for obvious mistakes, also because this is "pinned" top despite not the oldest thread. According to the tradition, if a Korean king had no son, he could choose one of his nephews to be the heir, or his line would die out and endangered the legitimacy of his successors (even if he were to be succeeded by his brother). Unless, if queen dowagers interfered, who could adopt any royal members as the next king as long as the generation is suitable.

 * "Upon the death fo Yi Gu, the next in-line would have been Yi Gap, who did not take a position." "Yi Cheung is not a candidate as Yi Wu had passed long before Yi Gang" - Seriously, Yi Gap had eight elder half-brothers, even that they passed away already, the descendants of these brothers would have priority to succeed if there were no adoption.
 * "Yi Won was not born to a Lady/Wife and thus ruling him out of the crown..." - Sure, neither Yi Won or Yi Seok could be the successor because they are junior members, but as Yi Won was adopted, the line of succession changed. According to the Korean news around the date of death of Yi Ku, it was shown that the adoption were officially authorized by Yi Ku when he was alive. Few news could be found about Yi Won because his activities are mainly in Korea, unlike his half-uncle, who are more famous outside Korea. - George6VI (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Also, really does not matter. The South Korean law is not relevant here, because South Korea does not recognize any title of nobility. The government doesn't give a rat's ass whether Yi Won or Yi Seok claims whatever title of nobility that they want to claim for themselves. The ultimate arbiter of such title - head of the household- as a such is at the hand of the private family association, which in this case would be the 전주이씨대동종약원. Nevertheless, since the title has no legal recognition, at the eye of the Korean law, Yi Hae-won's claim of emperorship is about as recognized as Yi Won's claim to be a "Hereditary Prince Imperial". In this case, we should probably respect the Family Association's decision. You can see the similar discussion that happened a couple years ago precisely in this page.

Also, what in god's name is "Confucian Rules"? The succession of Joseon monarch didn't follow strict -western- rules such as primogeniture. The king chose the crown prince, and when the line broke, the elder royals "chose" the next successor, who were often not the closest living relatives. Prime examples being the successions of Cheoljong of Joseon and Gojong of Joseon. Nevertheless, this discussion is meaningless, as I repeatedly said, Korean law doesn't have any jurisdiction over the private family business, and the monarchy of Korea simply doesn't exist in any form. Aixaurinoko (talk) 15:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

 * Please review my response below regarding Yi Won's 2012 formed Family Association . I respect the city of Jeonju's decision, Daum, a large news network in Korea's decision as do the Korean people.  The "Crown" the US Ambassador to Korea visited is the most recognized one.  That is Yi Seok.Theoneyihistorian (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Given our back and forth, I think that makes 'disputed' factual for Yi Seok as well. I'll add all of the disputed members into the article for factual accuracy given this conversation. Thanks. Theoneyihistorian (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * About the association, Jeonju Lee Royal Family Association was founded and recognized by the Korean government in 1957, and the association already had recognition when Yi Un and Yi Ku were still alive. So that should add enough weight about Yi Won being the legitimate leader of the clan, much more reliable than those claims came after. - George6VI (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Explaining the Recognition of the Imperial Family
The Constitution, since 1948 (and since 1919) has always recognized the Imperial Family. The 1919 Charter states specifically to "favor" the Imperial Family. The most recent 1987 form of the Constitution states that the Provisional Charter of 1919 serves as foundation of the Constitution.Theoneyihistorian (talk) 18:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, they don't. 1919 Provisional Charter does not supersede the modern Korean constitution. The 11th article of the Korean constitution clearly states that it doesn't acknowledge any form of nobility. Imperial claimants do not receive any form of recognition from the Korean government, nor do they hold any form of hereditary title recognized by the Korean government. Also, Yi Seok's claim to the throne is backed by nothing except for his self-claimed title and Yi Won is more or less considered as the legitimate 황세손. You can read the relevant discussion in the talk page as well. Are you a Korean/can read Korean documents perchance? Aixaurinoko (talk) 07:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

 * I'm not sure how "more or less considered as the legitimate" is defined by a company formed in 2012 . The Provisional Charter serves as the base of the Constitution.  It does not supersede it.  It IS A PART of the Constitution of South Korea.  Meanwhile, if you are speaking of organizations, the 2006 formed Imperial Grandsons Association with the city of Jeonju, home of the Imperial House of Yi, would be a more recognized pick, and considers Yiseok the legitimate 황손.  당연하지요, 한국사람이니까. 당신은? Theoneyihistorian (talk) 16:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Yi Seok
See, as I read some of the references in the article, I still can't understand why Yi Seok is referred as "king", "emperor" and the pretender; from what I can understand in them, Yi Seok is active on monarchy restoration but he doesn't necessarily self-proclaimed as emperor like Yi Hae-won, so I just removed all of those related contents. If there's any article explaining why Yi Seok is so-called emperor or leader of the family, please give the reference, especially Korean ones. - George6VI (talk) 23:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Recently Theoneyihistorian added back Yi Seok and Andrew as "leader", so I reverted them all. Since his claims are poor and there are less references, it is clear that Yi Seok is self-claimed leader and is not recognized by the royal house, and what Theoneyihistorian edited are original research. - George6VI (talk) 15:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why you erased my comments on the talk page. That said, I provided ample sources whereas you provided none. For clarity, here's some: https://1boon.daum.net/ziptoss/5fdb137f7407513e6466fc15, https://n.news.naver.com/article/052/0001521990 Theoneyihistorian (talk) 18:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Vandalization
User:George6VI appears to be rewriting history and disclaiming sources in the process. Theoneyihistorian (talk) 16:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Your claims are baseless comparing with other references. Also please discuss the latest talk thread in the bottom of the page next time. Also it has been so long since I made these edits, and apparently my versions already gain consensus, it is ridiculous to accuse any of my edits are vandalism or rewriting history. I would cease the edit now in case this is engaging in an edit war, but this doesn't mean that I agree what is made in the article. There are some things I want to point out to be false:

"... officially named heir apparent as [the late] Crown Princess Yi Bangja (the mother of Yi Ku and the wife of Yi Un) wrote a will, naming him as the 'first successor'”. He was the final heir. American Internet entrepreneur Andrew Lee, accepted a nomination by Yi Seok, on 6 October 2018, to become the Crown Prince of Korea."

The statement is not approved by Jeonju Lee Royal Family Association, and so this is a self claim and falsely used in news. - George6VI (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know what this company you are referring to is as my understanding as a historian has been focused primarily on factual references rather than statements from a random company. https://1boon.daum.net/ziptoss/5fdb137f7407513e6466fc15 Theoneyihistorian (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * As I said, the association is not a company, but an association that has been widely recognized long before the dispute happened. 1957 and 2005, there has been 5 decades. There are scholar researches and more publication more than online websites that can be used as references. e.g.:

I think your references can still be used, nevertheless, the statement can be like "this is how the media recognize Yi Seok and Andrew as last royalties". If you want to say how they are regarded as royalties, this Jeonju Lee Association can't be ignored or you'd be responsible of be biased.
 * (p. 41, 43)
 * (p. 41, 43)

In addition, "was officially named heir apparent as [the late] Crown Princess Yi Bangja (the mother of Yi Ku and the wife of Yi Un) wrote a will, naming him as the 'first successor'”. and "He was the final heir." are a disputed statement; in my previous revision, I added "claimed" to make it clear that this is more of a dispute, same as "emperor" "king" "crown prince" because of these are self-claimed and neither US of Korea officially recognize these titles. - George6VI (talk) 19:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 3 July 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 19:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

House of Yi → House of Jeonju Yi – Koreans typically refer to the royal clan as "Jeonju Yi" to distinguish it from other clans named Yi/Lee. About 15 percent of Koreans are surnamed Yi/Lee, while 6 percent are members of the royal clan. The Jeonju Yi is not even the largest of the fourteen Yi clans. For the stats, see "Lee (Korean surname)." On the clan's website, there is a "History of the Jeonju Lee family." They certainly don't call themselves "House of Yi." 99to99 (talk) 09:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 9 October 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

House of Jeonju Yi → House of Yi – The name of the article should be moved back to the House of Yi. The original move was requested by a now-banned 99to99, a sockpuppet of Kauffner, and the article was moved without discussion. In English usage, the House of "[insert surname]" indicates that the surname of the ruling house was [insert surname], sometimes with a nobiliary particle. For example, the surname of the House of Romanov is Romanov. Titling the article, House of Jeonju Yi, makes most readers think that the surname of the house was Jeonju Yi, when it was only Yi. For example, the name of one of the current pretenders is Yi Seok, not Jeonju Yi Seok. There are also no references at all in English to a "House of Jeonju Yi" except from Wikipedia clones. In contrast, the term "House of Yi" is sometimes used in English-using Korean media. This article from the Korea Times and this opinion piece from the Korea Herald, both use the terminology "House of Yi". 99to99 seems to have conflated this article (which is solely about the ruling house descended from a branch of the Jeonju Yi clan) with the Jeonju Yi clan, which already has an article. There also has only been one Yi family in Korea that became a ruling house, meaning readers are not likely to confuse the House of Yi with a different Yi family in Korea. The article for the ruling house of the Tang dynasty simply uses House of Li, despite the existence of Li families in China not from Longxi. -- CountHacker (talk) 19:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

 * : I would indeed assume that the family name of the House was 'Jeonju Yi'. I agree that it is evident from the July RM that the now-banned proposer was conflating House of Yi and Jeonju Yi clan. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 19:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nom and WP:UCN. The previous move on the basis of "no opposition" with no policy basis and one piece of external evidence should not have been conducted.  — <span style="border:1px solid #93010b;background:#ef0000;padding:2px;color:#efe6e6;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em; font-family: Georgia;"> AjaxSmack  04:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

KO name in lead
Minor note. Per MOS:KO, my gnomework usually involves putting the Korean term for the title in the lead. However, "House of Yi" seems to mostly be an English term; I've not seen an equivalent Korean term for it. Most people say "the Joseon/Korean Empire Royal Family" in Korean. toobigtokale (talk) 21:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:House of Yi


text:
User:Linkofazeroth/Sango123

-- Sango  123  00:52, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User:Linkofazeroth/Sango123


text:
Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go!

Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go! (スーパー・ロボット・モンキー・チーム・ハイパーフォース GO!) (also known as SRMTHFG or simply Super Robot Monkey Team) is an American-Japanese anime-influenced television series created by Ciro Nieli, one of the directors of Teen Titans, and the Showrunner and Executive Producer of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. It is produced by Walt Disney Television Animation, with animation being done by The Answer Studio in Japan. The series was the first original show produced for the Jetix block and for the Jetix and Disney channels worldwide, where the show premiered on September 18, 2004. It ran for four seasons composed of 52 episodes, each 22 minutes long.

Set on the fictional planet of Shuggazoom, the series follows the adventures of five cyborg monkeys and a human boy named Chiro as they work to protect their planet – and the rest of the universe – from the forces of evil.

Plot
The Super Robot Monkey Team is set in Shuggazoom City, a city that takes up a good portion of its planet, named Shuggazoom. The rest of the planet is divided into sparsely or entirely uninhabited zones. The largest of these making up the majority of the visible surface outside of Shuggazoom city is "The Zone of Wasted Years" which is a barren wasteland.

The main character is a boy named Chiro. When he was exploring the outskirts of the city, he stumbled upon a giant abandoned robot partially overgrown with plants but still accessible. Once inside, his curiosity got the better of him and he pulls an old power switch among a series of stasis tanks. In doing so, he awakened the five robotic monkeys that form the Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce. In the process Chiro also fused himself with the mysterious supernatural energy of the Power Primate, allowing him to transform into a stronger, braver fighter and the leader of the team. With the aid of the five Robot Monkeys: Sparx, Antauri, Gibson, Otto and Nova, their mission is to save Shuggazoom City from the evil Skeleton King, the main villain of the series, as well as any other evil forces that may threaten it.

Since Chiro was not born a superhero, or with any enhanced abilities, the five Robot Monkeys take up training him to hone his abilities which results in him leading the team. With each member possessing a different set of skills Chiro acts as a unifying force keeping them on point where they otherwise might fall to differing opinions, in addition to being familiar with the current culture of Shuggazoom. With the monkeys continuing to train Chiro he grows into the leader they need with the potential to fulfill his greater destiny as protector of the universe.

When fighting with larger enemies the Hyperforce uses the Super Robot, which can operate as a single entity or split into six separate vehicles for versatility. Its main attack, when combined as the whole robot, is Lasertron Fury. This powerful energy beam that is fired from its chest is capable of destroying large objects or hostile entities while an array of smaller weaponry is used to handle other lesser threats. The Super Robot also serves as Chiro and the Monkeys' headquarters and home while parked on its landing pad in Shuggazoom City.

Over the course of the series the history of both Shuggazoom and the Robot Monkeys is expanded upon revealing they were created long ago specifically to combat the evil Skeleton King by a brilliant inventor known only as the Alchemist. Having unintentionally released a great evil into the world with his experiments the Hyperforce was his attempt to prepare for an uncertain future where defenses would be needed. The Hyperforce itself also expanded as the series ran to include various allies and a rogues gallery of enemies as recurring characters.

Main

 * Greg Cipes as Chiro
 * Kevin Michael Richardson as Antauri
 * Tom Kenny as Gibson
 * Kari Wahlgren as Nova
 * Clancy Brown as Otto
 * Corey Feldman as Sparx
 * Mark Hamill as Skeleton King
 * Ashley Johnson as Jinmay
 * James Hong as Mandarin

Recurring

 * Hynden Walch as Sorceress Valeena
 * Jeff Bennett and Eric Idle as Lord Scrapperton
 * Jeffrey Combs as Gyrus Krinkle
 * Mark Hamill as Skeleton King Droid
 * Arthur Burghardt as Commodore Game Master
 * Tara Strong as Alliana

Production
Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go! was created by director and producer Ciro Nieli. In 2003, an executive from Disney accepted the project.

The series is influenced by Japanese animation. It is also inspired by Star Trek, Super Sentai, Power Rangers, Voltron, and Star Wars. Animator and designer Lynne Naylor, who worked on Samurai Jack and Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi, served as the art director. Her husband, Chris Reccardi, writer for Samurai Jack and The Powerpuff Girls was the assistant director. The art style was a tribute to classic anime, such as Speed Racer, Astro Boy, and Cyborg 009, and was influenced by the works of Ken Ishikawa, Go Nagai, Sanpei Shirato, Shotaro Ishinomori, and Osamu Tezuka. Other crew members include Tad Stones, who also worked on Buzz Lightyear of Star Command, Greg Weisman, creator of Gargoyles, Eric Trueheart, a writer for Invader Zim, Rich Fogel, a writer for Justice League and Pinky and the Brain, Chris Mitchell, who worked on SpongeBob SquarePants, and Kevin Hopps, who also worked on Animaniacs. Sebastian Evans composed the score of the show. The theme song of Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go! is performed by Japanese synthpop/new wave band Polysics.

Broadcast
Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go! premiered on ABC Family's Jetix programming block on September 18, 2004. It also aired on Toon Disney's Jetix block, until the Jetix programming block was taken off of ABC Family in August 2006, and the series began to air exclusively on Toon Disney. The show was planned to air on ABC Kids on September 17, 2005, but it was scrapped. It was shown on Jetix UK from January 1, 2005 until July 22, 2006. In 2005, Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go! aired on Champ TV in South Korea. The entire series was broadcast in the United Kingdom on GMTV's Toonattik. In Ireland, it was released on RTÉ Two as part of "The Den" children's programming block. In 2007, the series was released on Mio TV in Singapore.

The series was produced for widescreen, but originally shown cropped due to network restrictions.

Home media
Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go! was later made available to stream on Disney+.

It never got the season sets, but it did had 3 DVD discs with 1 episode that comes with the action figures, they got episodes "Flytor", "Lords of Soturix 7" and "Planetoid Q".

Critical response
Shreya Suresh Kumar of ComingSoon.net said, "This series has a perfect blend of humor, action, and sci-fi elements, making it an exciting experience. It features a stellar voice cast with Greg Cipes, Kevin Michael Richardson, Tom Kenny, and Kari Wahlgren. It is a series that appeals to everyone, from children to adults." Charlotte Gorrell of MovieWeb stated, "It is a great series for the entire family, and a great introduction to science fiction for a young audience. At the same time, the humor in the one-liners appeals to a more adult audience. It uses the same personalities and eccentric imagery that are popular in anime. The futuristic world, mixed with a bright colors and a relatable protagonist, combines into a great family-friendly series."

Accolades
The series was nominated for Best Sound Editing in Television Animated at the 2006 Golden Reel Awards. It was nominated for Best Sound Editing in Sound Effects, Foley, Dialogue, ADR and Music for Television Animation at the 2007 Golden Reel Awards.

Possible revival
In December 2014, across an interview with AnimeSuperhero.com, Ciro Nieli stated, "There’s a finale planned for that and I don’t know how I’m gonna do it but I swear that I’m gonna do it someday. I can do it as one movie or I can do it as a whole season, it just depends on how much breadth I want to give it. Look at the last episode. You can either pick it up from there or you can go ‘Five years later: it’s the war of the undead vs the robot chimps.’ It’s this crazy battlefield where all forces have kinda teamed up against the ultimate evil. It’d be awesome. It’s all figured out pretty much. Everyone bugs me about it all the time and I really wanna sit down and tell everybody what happens but I’d rather just make it someday and give it to them. Worst case scenario: before I die I’ll do a perfect graphic novel of it and then Disney can sue me posthumously ‘cause they now completely own it and that’s how it goes. I guess I could make a comic and change the names and hairdos…" In June 2018, Greg Cipes shared one of Ciro Nieli’s concept art on Twitter, as it could be either a reboot or continuation for a fifth season, while showing off two new characters set to appear. As of July 2024, there have been no updates about the shows revival.

Miscellaneous

 * In 2005, Majesco published the Game Boy Advance Video Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go! - Volume 1.
 * In 2006, Hasbro released several action figures inspired by Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go!.
 * In 2012, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles episode “The Weird World of Wyrm“ rehashed the same plot to episode “Meet the Wigglenog” and Wigglenog makes a cameo.

title: Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go!


text:
Nitrogen oxide sensor

A nitrogen oxide sensor or  sensor is typically a high-temperature device built to detect nitrogen oxides in combustion environments such as an automobile, truck tailpipe or smokestack.

Overview
The term represents several forms of nitrogen oxides such as NO (nitric oxide), NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) and N2O (nitrous oxide, also known as laughing gas). In a gasoline engine, NO is the most common form of at around 93%, while NO2 is around 5% and the rest is N2O. There are other forms of such as N2O4 (the dimer of NO2), which only exists at lower temperatures, and N2O5, for example. Meanwhile, for diesel engines, the emissions situation is different. Owing to their much higher combustion temperatures (resulting from their high cylinder compression ratios as well as turbocharging or supercharging), diesel engines produce much higher engine-out emissions than spark-ignition gasoline engines. The recent availability of Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) allows properly equipped diesel engines to emit similar values of at the tailpipe compared to a typical gasoline engine with a 3-way catalyst. The SCR changes the harmful nitrogen oxides by adding the solution AdBlue which reduces environmental pollution and protects the exhaust system. In addition, the diesel oxidation catalyst significantly increases the fraction of NO2 in "" by oxidizing over 50% of NO using the excess oxygen in the diesel exhaust gases. The drive to develop a sensor arises from environmental factors. gases can cause various problems such as smog and acid rain. Many governments around the world have passed laws to limit their emissions (along with other combustion gases such as SOx (oxides of sulfur), CO (carbon monoxide) and CO2 (carbon dioxide) and hydrocarbons). Companies have realized that one way of minimizing emissions is to first detect them and then to employ some sort of feedback loop in the combustion process, thereby enabling the minimization of  production by, for example, combustion optimization or regeneration of  traps. Therefore, in many applications with exhaust-gas treatment systems, one NOx sensor is used upstream of the exhaust-gas treatment system (upstream) and a second sensor is used downstream of the exhaust-gas treatment system. The upstream sensor is used for the aforementioned feedback loop. Meanwhile, the downstream sensor is used mainly to confirm that the legislated emissions limits have not been exceeded.

Harsh environment
Due to the high temperature of the combustion environment, only certain types of material can operate in situ. The majority of sensors developed have been made out of ceramic type metal oxides, with the most common being yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), which is currently used in the decades-old oxygen sensor. The YSZ is compacted into a dense ceramic and conducts oxygen ions (O2−) at the high temperatures of a tailpipe such at 400 °C and above. To get a signal from the sensor a pair of high-temperature electrodes such as noble metals (platinum, gold, or palladium) or other metal oxides are placed onto the surface and an electrical signal such as the change in voltage or current is measured as a function of concentration.

High sensitivity and durability required
The levels of NO are around 100–2000 ppm (parts per million) and NO2 20–200 ppm in a range of 1–10% O2. The sensor has to be very sensitive to pick up these levels.

The main challenges in the sensor development are selectivity, sensitivity, stability, reproducibility, response time, limit of detection, and cost. In addition due to the harsh environment of combustion the high gas flow rate can cool the sensor which alters the signal or it can delaminate the electrodes over time and soot particles can degrade the materials.

One of the major challenges faced by such gas sensors is humidity. The relative effect on signal response is highly subjective to the sensor type. Electrochemical sensors are mostly immune from humidity effect as water molecules help regulate the electrolyte concentration but long term exposure to dry gas can reduce the solvent concentration of the electrolyte. High amount of cross sensitivity has been observed in gas sensors due to similarity in electron exchange mechanism between target gases and water molecules.

title: Nitrogen oxide sensor


text:
User talk:Arunkv

Archive

 * 1) /Welcome
 * 2) /Moving Pages
 * 3) /Firefox Extensions

Oracle Corporation
Thanks for your note. I wish I could explain why I made those edits -- I see them right there in the edit summary. Unfortunately, I was under the impression that I was reverting vandalism on an entirely different article (as I recall, to an article about a high school); I have absolutely no idea how I came to revert your edits to Oracle Corporation (which seem 100% non-vandalism to me), except to say that it must have been some sort of mis-click on my part -- I have no recollection of ever wanting to do anything at all to the article. Please accept my sincere apologies, and if you haven't already done so, I will save you the trouble of undoing my mistake. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I believe I've now restored the article to the state it was in before I stupidly fouled it up, and I have also re-made the most recent edit you did to the number of employees. (You may want to check that, but I did copy and paste it from your most recent edit.)  Again, I'm still baffled as to how it happened, but it was apparently just a dumb mistake on my part and I hope you accept my apology.  Accounting4Taste: talk 23:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I totally thought I was cleaning up James Whitcomb Riley High School, to the best of my knowledge.  I'm still baffled.  I can only think it must have been a mis-click of some kind.  Thank you for your courtesy and your understanding.  Accounting4Taste: talk 23:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Arunkv! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ed Oates -

Articles for deletion nomination of Kuroo
I have nominated Kuroo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Kuroo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Psychonaut (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Naomi O. Seligman

The article Naomi O. Seligman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG; only one source from Seligman's husband, no reliable sources found elsewhere"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reppoptalk 02:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arunkv


text:
Tanisha Lynn

Tanisha Lynn Eanes, known professionally as Tanisha Lynn (born September 14, 1978 in Houston, Texas) is an American actress.

Brief biography
Lynn is best known for her portrayal of Danielle Frye, the daughter of Derek Frye (formerly William Christian and currently Charles Parnell) and Mimi Reed (Shari Headley), a role which she played from March 2004 until January 2007 on the show All My Children. Although rumors about Lynn's status with the show were circulating for some time, due to her lack of storyline, it was reported at Pine Valley Bulletin: Ins and Outs in January 2007 that Lynn had taped her final scenes in December 2006, last to air in late January. She graduated from the Theatre Department at the High School for the Performing and Visual Arts in Houston and went on to the Tisch School of the Arts at NYU.

Her other appearances include:
 * Robot Stories
 * Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
 * My Wife and Kids
 * As Audrey in Shakespeare's As You Like It at Worth Street Theater Company.

Personal life
Lynn parents are William Eanes and Brenda Davis. She has two siblings: Kenneth Davis and Brent Eanes, now she makes guest appearances in Tyler Perry's hit series on TBS called Tyler Perry's House of Payne, 2010 season.

title: Tanisha Lynn