text:
List of storms named Norma

The name Norma has been used for ten tropical cyclones worldwide, eight in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, one in the Western Pacific Ocean and one in the Australian Region.

In the Eastern Pacific:
 * Tropical Storm Norma (1970) – its remnants fueled the Labor Day Storm of 1970, causing severe floods and damage in the U.S. state of Arizona
 * Hurricane Norma (1974) – Category 1 hurricane that made landfall west of Acapulco, Mexico
 * Hurricane Norma (1981) – Category 3 hurricane that caused minor damage in Mexico, though its remnants caused severe flooding in Texas and Oklahoma
 * Hurricane Norma (1987) – Category 1 hurricane that dissipated just before landfall, caused heavy rainfall in California as a remnant low
 * Tropical Storm Norma (1993) – moderate tropical storm that stayed at sea
 * Tropical Storm Norma (2005) – strong tropical storm that also stayed in the open ocean
 * Hurricane Norma (2017) – Category 1 hurricane that briefly threatened land but moved out to sea
 * Hurricane Norma (2023) – Category 4 hurricane that caused minor damage in Baja California Sur and three deaths in Sinaloa

In the Western Pacific:
 * Typhoon Norma (1948) – formed in the open ocean without affecting land

In the Australian Region:
 * Cyclone Norma (1964) – formed in the open ocean without affecting land

title: List of storms named Norma


text:
Riojasaurus

Riojasaurus (meaning "Rioja lizard") was a herbivorous sauropodomorph dinosaur named after La Rioja Province in Argentina where it was found in the Los Colorados Formation in the Ischigualasto-Villa Unión Basin by José Bonaparte. It lived during the Late Triassic (Norian stage) and grew to about 6.6 m long. Riojasaurus is the only known riojasaurid to live in South America.

Discovery and naming
Riojasaurus incertus was named by Bonaparte (1969) and was based on the holotype specimen, PVL 3808, which was discovered in 1966 and consists of a postcranial skeleton which lacks the skull and mandibles, but preserves 6 presacral vertebrae, diverse caudals, both scapulae, the ischia, and the bones of the hand. In total, at least twenty specimens have been assigned to R. incertus, and the first cranial material of R. incertus was discovered in 1987 and described in 1995.

In 1994, 56 caudal vertebrae from one specimen, and a cast of the skull of Riojasaurus incertus, along with several other specimens, were stolen from the National University of La Rioja in Argentina. As of 2023, the whereabouts of the stolen fossils are unknown.

Description
Riojasaurus had a heavy body, bulky legs, and a long neck and tail. Its leg bones were dense and massive for an early sauropodomorph. In 2010 Gregory S. Paul estimated its length at 6.6 m and its weight at 800 kg. Large individuals were estimated to have reached 10 m long and weighed 3 MT. By contrast, its vertebrae were lightened by hollow cavities, and unlike most early sauropodomorphs, Riojasaurus had four sacral vertebrae instead of three. It has been thought it probably moved slowly on all fours and was unable to rear up on its back legs. The nearly equal length of the fore and hindlimbs has also been interpreted as suggestive of an obligatorily quadrupedal gait, and the relative robustness of the forelimbs and hindlimbs is in the range of quadrupedal animals. However, the morphology of the hand and shoulder girdle has been interpreted as inconsistent with a quadrupedal gait.

No skull was found with the first skeleton of Riojasaurus, although a well-preserved skull attributed to Riojasaurus was found later. The teeth of Riojasaurus were leaf shaped and serrated. The upper jaw contained 5 teeth at the front, with 24 more behind them in a row that ended under the eyes.

Comparisons between the scleral rings of Riojasaurus and modern birds and reptiles suggest that it may have been cathemeral, active throughout the day at short intervals.

Classification
Many scientists think that Riojasaurus was closely related to Melanorosaurus, known from the Triassic-Early Jurassic period. However, studies at Bristol University, England, suggest that it is unique in some key ways, such as the longer bones in its neck. It is certainly quite different from other sauropodomorphs found in the Los Colorados Formation of Argentina.

Due to their size and limb anatomy Riojasaurus and the possibly related Melanorosaurus have been considered close relatives of the earliest sauropods.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Riojasaurus


text:
List of storms named Norman

The name Norman has been used for seven tropical cyclones in the eastern Pacific Ocean.
 * Hurricane Norman (1978) – a Category 4 hurricane that struck California as a tropical depression.
 * Hurricane Norman (1982) – a Category 2 hurricane that turned toward Baja California.
 * Tropical Storm Norman (1994) – weak, short-lived tropical storm.
 * Tropical Storm Norman (2000) – struck Mexico.
 * Tropical Storm Norman (2006) – near southwestern Mexico.
 * Tropical Storm Norman (2012) – weak and short lived, it also struck Mexico.
 * Hurricane Norman (2018) – powerful Category 4 hurricane that moved into the Central Pacific.

The name Norman has been used for two tropical cyclones in the Southern Hemisphere.
 * Cyclone Norman (1977)
 * Cyclone Norman (2000) – no direct impact on Western Australia.

title: List of storms named Norman


text:
User talk:Kmarcello

Does anyone know if Superoxide Dismutase and Catalase be effective as antioxidents if they are taken orally vs injection?

KM

title: User talk:Kmarcello


text:
Category talk:Online chat

should this be a subcat of Category:Online social networking ? --lynX 17:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

 * Yes 2600:1700:DA80:CAB0:F1D9:7A58:A50D:EF63 (talk) 17:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Would "Synchronous conferencing" be a better name for this category? MCG 06:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

 * sounds more encyclopedic to me... --lynX

title: Category talk:Online chat


text:
User:Muggle~enwiki

''This is the userpage of User:Muggle. For the article, click here.''

Welcome to my userpage. I joined Wikipedia under this username on July 20th, 02005. I have had user accounts on Wikipedia before - I have had to abandon all of them after being in disputes. I hope I will fare better in this one.

As my username suggests, I am interested in Harry Potter - the novel idea of a secret wizarding world fascinates me. I am also interested in a huge variety of other things, too numerous to list here.

Feel free to drop me a line on my talk page, but my email is disabled.

title: User:Muggle~enwiki


text:
List of storms named Octave

The name Octave has been used for five tropical cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Ocean.
 * Tropical Storm Octave (1983)
 * Hurricane Octave (1989)
 * Hurricane Octave (2001)
 * Tropical Storm Octave (2013)
 * Tropical Storm Octave (2019)

title: List of storms named Octave


text: User talk:68.44.160.24

title: User talk:68.44.160.24


text:
Talk:Rio Linda, California

I do believe Rush started using Rio Linda because he drove thru the town and saw what a wreck it was while he had a show in Sacramento.
 * Correct. Rio Linda is between Sacramento and the transmitter site of KFBK, the station where Rush's show grew up.  There was no cancellation.  One day Rush drove through Rio Linda, which used to have, well, an image problem— he saw cars up on cinder blocks and used appliances and other trash in front yards, and chickens and dogs wandering the streets.  Rush's sarcastic sense of humor kicked in and the stereotype of Rio Linda residents as ignorant hillbillies was born.  Therefore the phrase "For those of you in Rio Linda…" is a euphamism for "To put this in terms so simple that even stupid people can figure it out…".  —RandallJones 01:01, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Incorrect. Limbaugh drove the length of Rio Linda Blvd., which travels through the slums of Del Paso Heights. It was here that he saw cars on blocks, abandoned appliances, etc. He's relayed the story many times, and it's painfully obvious to those who live in Sacramento that he's confused Rio Linda Blvd. with the physical town of Rio Linda.- 71.137.216.92 22:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

 * If you have a citation, I'll let your comment and edit (and similar edits) go unchallenged. I have lived in or near Sacramento since 1960, had friends in Rio Linda at the time Rush started using that phrase and visited there often, and listened to Limbaugh's show on KFBK from the third day it was on the air back in the 1980s.  Perhaps Rush changed his story in the intervening years, but I'm not speaking out of ignorance and it's not "painfully obvious".  —RandallJones 01:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Rush re-explained the story (30 November 2007) and said that people at the time told him that he just happened to go through the bad part. He also said that "Property values have since risen out there." It other words, he admitted that it never was bombed out in all places, and it's better now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.176.224 (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

None of this changes the fact that Rio Linda is nationally famous for the ongoing reference by Limbaugh. This should be noted in the article. 75.3.224.153 (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Regardless, Limbaugh's comments are derogatory to the citizens of Rio Linda. I would take no issue with a comment similar to "Rush Limbaugh frequently refers to Rio Linda on his daily radio show." His direct quotations should be kept on Limbaugh's own Wikipedia page, if at all.

It doesn't mention Rush anywhere in this article. The only reason I looked it up was to see what he was talking about. By the way, guy above, you didn't sign your post. (BTW I fixed it) 174.51.88.115 (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

There, FIFY. There are a plethora of pages on Wikipedia that a plethora of people find offensive. This alone doesn't provide grounds for the POV omission of relevant and factual content. If you can show an example of where this is deemed acceptable elsewhere on Wikipedia, we might have something to talk about. Geeze, just look up a Wiki entry for any pejorative term. Also, if you could provide a reference for your assertion that the people of Rio Linda find Rush Limbaugh's mention on the Rio Linda wiki entry, it'd be worthy of note on the page. Still, not exactly grounds for removal. Ciao 75.171.160.103 (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Nowhere on Wikipedia will you find information that exists solely because of it's distinctly derogatory nature. Limbaugh's reference is both derogatory and offensive to the subject matter, and thus should not be noted in the wiki entry. It's used as a common technique of Limbaugh's however, and SHOULD be listed on his page. 69.108.1.73 (talk) 18:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

"Nowhere on Wikipedia" Wrong. Riverside Plaza. It's a redirect from "Crack stacks" BTW. You have no argument. 75.171.151.16 (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

 * You're a fool. The Riverside Plaza article states that 50% of the complex is designated as low-income housing, and "A string of homicides in the early 1990s also contributed to a negative image." Citing the facts surrounding a subject is one thing. Citing a racist, drug addicted talk show host's opinions is another. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.108.1.73 (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

 * I'm not sure why you've made this debate personal but it's rather distasteful. You should know that your personal attack is a direct violation of Wikipedia policy.  You should review the "Five Pillars of Wikipedia", especially 2 (Wiki is NPoV), 4 (Interact in a CIVIL manner), and 5 (Wiki does not have firm rules).  You should also sign your posts.  Oh, and relax, it isn't personal.  Life is too short to come unraveled over a disagreement on Wiki. 76.25.25.109 (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

 * I'd like to point out the irony in your trying to remove Limbaugh's reference because you find it "offensive" and then coming into the talk page and write highly offensive remarks. Watch out y'all, the thought police are on patrol.  174.51.97.71 (talk) 15:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

The Limbaugh reference is notable, sourced, and NPOV. I just got done digging through Wiki policy and no where do I see anything that would lead me to suspect that it's in violation. As such, until you can show me where it is, I will continue to maintain the page. 174.51.97.71 (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

 * How can it possibly be NPOV when you're referencing Limbaugh's personal POV? The article should contain factual details about the subject matter. Not the personal opinions of a celebrity. How does any content that Limbaugh has generated contribute to the source material? --75.48.14.15 (talk) 00:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

 * Your revision is an acceptable compromise. 174.51.97.71 (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Added reference for Limbaugh to make it easier for those whose query is directly related to Limbaugh's use of Rio Linda to find what they're looking for. 174.51.99.30 (talk) 05:34, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

"Not relevant to this article, and appears to be WP:OR anyway" "same reasons. Discuss on talk before adding again, please." - Notes left on Article Edit by user who removed content without participating in discussion.

1) "Not relevant to this article" - This discussion is full of evidence to the contrary. If user wishes to create a separate section such as "References in Media" "In Pop Culture" etc. it is open for discussion.

2) "appears to be WP:OR" - Content referenced to a primary source. That the user did not bother to check suggests dubious intent.

3) "Discuss on talk before adding again" - This entire discussion board is about this issue. There is not a single comment here that does not relate to Rush Limbaugh.  That this argument even appears on the edits page for the article when the user who posted it has not commented in this discussion is disingenuous and further suggests user has dubious intentions.

Clearly, he neither bothered to check the reference or the discussion page before removing content. That is not how Wikipedia is intended to work and I have and will continue to revert any related edits by said user unless the community can reach consensus on the validity of his claims in this discourse. Aphek (talk) 04:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Using a primary source that has not been published in a reliable source is WP:OR. You would need a reliable source that this is an issue for the city.  This is an article about the city, and while a running gag on his show might be interesting to fans of his show, but has nothing to do with this article.  If you can find reliable sources that indicate this is important to the city of Rio Linda (not Rush Limbaugh), then please provide them here.  And finally, I would remind you that it is up to the editor seeking to add or restore material to get consensus before adding it again (it is not up to other editors to justify the removal).  Adding it without consensus or while discussion continues constitutes edit-warring.  --Loonymonkey (talk) 17:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

 * This entire discussion page illustrates a dialogue that has progressed to consensus. Hence, I have reinserted the reference.  Here's why it's an issue for the city: The Rush references are mentioned at Rio Linda Online and Rio Linda Our Town (both external links from this page), and MyRioLinda.com.  There is a Facebook group called "Admitting you're from Rio Linda CA" with nearly 500 members.  A Google search of Rio Linda has mention of the joke in second, fourth, and fifth place on the first page alone.  Reading further shows that many people on the web, when mentioning they're from Rio Linda, add that "yes, it's the place Limbaugh talks about".  Rush' mentioning Rio Linda on air brings nationwide recognition to Rio Linda that it would not achieve otherwise. And as far as WP:OR, if that's the measure then we should probably remove the history section since it contains no references whatsoever.174.51.89.57 (talk) 22:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Opposing views
I suppose that confronting opposing arguments is correct when no really neutral wording can be found. I added the following quotes in the reference section.

"I love the people of Rio Linda and I want to make sure they understand what's being discussed on the program, so I always will change or expand certain words' definition so they are not left out. It's an act of true compassion by a broadcast specialist."

- Rush Limbaugh

"He routinely mocked Rio Linda for its white-trash, trailer park ways - cars up on blocks, laziness and unemployment all around - or so he thought."

- Dwight Lang, lecturer in the sociology department at the University of Michigan, Rio Lindan and the son of a plumber.

Turesable (talk) 23:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Nice, although I don't see how "son of a plumber" is relevant but it doesn't seem to appear in the article so w/e. 67.6.129.142 (talk) 03:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

 * You are right, "son of a plumber" is not relevant to Wikipedia, but it appears clearly in the article. "In 2005 I traveled home to bury my Dad - a World War II veteran, plumber and union organizer". Turesable (talk) 20:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Average salary...
...does not go in the lead. Work it into the Demographics section, in conformity with every other municipality-related article. PenitentWhaler (talk) 22:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Do you really not know how to spell "salary?" How is this page legit? This is more like a blog than a factual page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.74.240.240 (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Spelling of salary has been corrected.

title: Talk:Rio Linda, California


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Baltimore Love Thing

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was It has already been recreated with different, and legitimate content. I am therefore closing the debate, and no action need be taken. -Splash 01:51, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

A Baltimore Love Thing
Sandbox-like content. User probably didn't know that there is a place to test edits.
 * I'm hesitant to place a vote for a VFD placed anonymously, but this one is pretty cut and dried. Delete, though kinda cool in a found art sort of way. 23skidoo 17:28, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Newbie test. I've speedied it. In the future you can put in the article and these will get cleaned up. DJ Clayworth 17:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baradise

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE (It's actually gone to BJAODN)

Baradise
A scrupulously neutral article that seems to be about somebody's backyard. DJ Clayworth 17:19, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete Although I have to admit I got a few chuckles out of it. Grpunkim 18:31, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Is there a place for satirical articles. Some of them are quite humorous and it would be a shame to lose them entirely. --Bayyoc 18:33, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Yep, BJAODN, which is my vote as well. --Icelight 19:13, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Then i'll change my vote to BJAODN as well.--Bayyoc 19:41, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJADON. This is too good to lose forever! ^^; Thorns Among Our Leaves 19:20, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. The map is a nice touch. -- BD2412 talk 19:35, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Articles about people's back gardens don't get in yet? ☺ Uncle G 19:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Should we chalk that up as a keep vote, then, Uncleg? Seriously though, it actually is sort of funny (unlike alot of BJAODN stuff) though I still think overuse of BJAODN encourages this sort of behavior. I won't oppose its presence there, but obviously it needs to be deleted from the article space. -R. fiend 20:34, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJOADN is not paper!!! (although I do see your point). -- BD2412 talk 22:28, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Stop Drinking BJAODN. humblefool®Have you voted in the CSD poll yet? 21:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Those polls are closed, now... -Splash 22:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it "features a swimming pool, lawn chairs, and many shrubs and trees." which means its nearly the same as a school. Delete for the above excellent reasons. -Splash 22:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN --Carnildo 23:51, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN (and how can this article not specify the surface area?) DS 23:51, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Lovely. Grutness...  wha?  01:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. JamesBurns 08:17, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
List of storms named Odile

The name Odile or Odille has been used for five tropical cyclones worldwide.

In the Eastern Pacific:

 * Hurricane Odile (1984), a Category 2 hurricane that made landfall northwest of Zihuatanejo and killed 21 people
 * Hurricane Odile (1990), a powerful Category 4 hurricane that did not threaten land
 * Tropical Storm Odile (2008), a tropical storm that affected Central America and Mexico
 * Hurricane Odile (2014), a devastating Category 4 hurricane that struck the Baja California Peninsula and also affected parts of Northwest Mexico and the Southwestern United States

The name Odile was retired from the Eastern Pacific naming lists following the 2014 hurricane season, and replaced with Odalys for the 2020 season.

In the South-West Indian Ocean:
 * Cyclone Odille (1994) – a powerful Category 3 tropical cyclone that did not threaten land

title: List of storms named Odile


text:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Darth Nihilus

Discussion moved from main deletion page:
 * It is unbacked; for all I know, the details came from fan fiction. From where did this elaborately detailed biography come?  The article doesn't say.  Postdlf 19:37, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Are you blind? It says right at the beginning that the character comes a game.  Take a wild guess where the information came from, sparky.--Kross 19:46, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * It says the character is in the game, but it doesn't attribute all information in the article to it. Am I to believe that if I'm playing the game, at some point Darth Nihilus is going to attack me with a "Ha-ha, I strike you, Jedi!  I'm a 'survivor of the Mandalorian Wars, and might have been at one point a prisoner of the Mandalorians'!  You cannot defeat me!"  How was this information established?  In the game?  How?  Outside of the game?  If so, in what sources?  Postdlf 19:53, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The article even says the character doesn't say a word. So what does that leave us?  Do other characters in the game talk about him at great length?  Is there an expository text screen that pops up every time he appears?  Does he merely have a bio in the printed insert?  If so, we may be left with an "article" that really should be nothing more than "Darth Nihilus is the name of an enemy in  Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords.  An elaborate backstory was published in the game cartridge insert, but as the character is mute and simply portrayed as mysterious, this has little impact on game play, nor has the character or his biography been incorporated into any other Star Wars fiction or media."  Hardly call for in-depth coverage.  Postdlf 19:54, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, he is talked about at great length by other characters. There's no bio on him anywhere - not on the official site, not in the game manual, not in the strategy guide, nothing. All of this comes from the course of playing the game, and not by expository text screens either. In-depth coverage is quite warranted. Nufy8 22:24, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Could you restructure the article to reflect that context? Articles about fictional characters shouldn't read as if they were written within the character's fictional world about a real person, but instead should describe how they are used in real works of fiction in our world.  This shouldn't be too hard to do.  But I'm still failing to see why the character shouldn't just be merged and redirected to the game article, if he has not been used outside of it.  Postdlf 00:13, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * What, you mean like including the context of how one learns of certain facts about Nihilus's past? I could do that, but I can't recall everything, so I'll probably need help. And although Nihilus only appears in one piece of Star Wars media, his existence marks a significant change in the entire universe of Star Wars, which spans several media. Nufy8 01:30, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I meant something along the lines of "Game players merely encounter Nihilus as a mute enemy, who shows up at level ____ and ____. His background is explained through expository dialogue provided by other characters, however, who explain that _____.  This information is helpful to the player, who must know that ___ is true in order to ____."  Something like that.  How is this character encountered in our world?  What else about the subject matter would Wikipedia possibly care about?  As for your last statement, a "significant change in the entire universe of Star Wars" is only significant to Wikipedia in so much as it is expressed in actual works of fiction.  If Nihilus only appears in this game and never anything else, the character is not very significant, no matter how much effort the game designers put into fitting it into the continuity of other works of fiction.  Even if the game were to "reveal" that Nihilus actually was Darth Vader's father, that would still be no more than a footnote: "In the game ___, Nihilus is represented as Anakin's father.  However, the character and this origin of Anakin have yet to be repeated in any other Star Wars work of fiction."  In this hypothesis, it would be silly to rewrite the entire Darth Vader article to reflect this "truth," because the character existed for 25 years without this being "true" of it, and it would only be "true" within one fictional work that certainly had much less exposure than one of the films.  It's the impact in our world that counts.  Don't view it from within the fictional world.Postdlf 02:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * But its impact on our world goes hand in hand with the fictional universe, just as hundreds of Star Wars characters with articles on Wikipedia. Significant canon characters are recognized outside the fictional universe. That's why some random person making up a character isn't notable - it isn't accepted by the real world, aside from the person who created it. Nufy8 03:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * True, but the question is what that notability entails. There are obviously fans who will work very hard to incorporate every bit of official Star Wars trivia into a coherent story, from the books, comics, movies, tv series, games, etc.  Most people won't do that, however.  Whatever notability may come from fans who do try to piece together all Star Wars media may be sizeable (and that's why every Star Wars character deserves at least a mention in some relevant article), but it's still insignificant compared to the number of people who just see the movies, or the movies and perhaps some of the cartoons or books.  Fans and even George Lucas may say, "Yeah, this guy was always there, in the history of every Star Wars work," but that doesn't make it so unless he was actually portrayed in those works.  See retcon.  Postdlf 03:49, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Of course more people will see the movies than play the video games, but popularity is not proportional to notability. And even characters from the movies (such as Yoda) are involved in retconning, not just those strictly from EU. Nufy8 16:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * And if a single comic book issue retcons that Yoda was actually a woman, that detail doesn't overtake the character's previous portrayals in other more dominant media; it would merely be a footnote at the bottom of the article. And if a Sith lord is introduced in one video game and not used elsewhere, he shouldn't be treated as of equal importance to Darth Maul, Darth Sidious, or anyone else who appeared in the films and multiple Star Wars media, no matter how "important" the video game creators tried to make his story.  He's still merely ancillary to the video game.  If the video game revealed that he trained Palpatine/Darth Sidious, that would just be a footnote at the bottom of the Darth Sidious article: "The game blahblahblah portrayed Darth Nihilus as the master who trained Sidious.  However, this was not mentioned in earlier appearances of Sidious in various Star Wars media, and has yet to be repeated elsewhere."  Just because it would be a significant change to the Star Wars mythos doesn't mean its a significant change in the character as he has been portrayed, if you get my meaning.  Postdlf 17:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * See Phantom Lady for an idea of what I mean; I wrote that article so as to portray the fiction only in terms of the published works, not from the perspective of someone who lives in the same world as the character. Retcons should get described in the order in which they are published, not in the order of fictional chronology.  This is difficult, but I think necessary to make these articles encyclopedic instead of fancruft.  Postdlf 17:51, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * So there's a number requirement for the amount of media a fictional character has to be in before it's notable? Because it's only been in one published work it doesn't deserve to be documented in its own article? Adding to the amount of media something is portrayed in doesn't automatically make it more notable. It does, however, make it more popular, and like I said, the two aren't the same. Nufy8 18:10, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd say a fictional character's notability is a function of the public awareness and impact of that character. Because it's only been in one published work, it's simply harder to make a case for its notability independent of that work than if it were in many.  As far as how many published works, for example, I'd say that a character who only appeared in one Star Wars film is likely more notable than a character who only appeared in twenty comic books, no matter what that character's story was (though I doubt any character who appeared in any of the films hasn't also been used ad nauseum in every other form of media).  What would you say makes a character notable, for purposes of Wikipedia?  BTW, I just found another good example of the type of reality-focused writing about fiction that I'm talking about: take a look at Robert April, a Star Trek character.  Postdlf 02:34, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * A character that plays a significant role tied to a fictional universe, in the universe itself and by the outside world's recognition of its importance and authenticity is what I see as notable. I see no problem in mentioning a major character on the article of the media in which he or she appears, but to deny in-depth biographical information and how that character interacts with the user seems like an unreasonable limitation. And on the other extreme, describing in-depth biographical and interactive aspects of every character's being on just that one medium's page would be detrimental to its purpose; to cover the game itself, and not get bogged down in character specifics. A good example of that is Half-Life and Half-Life 2, which leave important characters not seen in any other media to have their own articles. Nufy8 03:02, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Well, we do have list of minor Sith characters, which could handle any details that the game article can't absorb. I just can't see a character that only appears in one game as significant. Even if the game creators wrote that Nihilus is really the cross-dressing lover of Palpatine, that's still just in the one game, which most people familiar with Star Wars and Palpatine won't encounter, so it can't be said to have affected a significant change in Star Wars media until that gets repeated elsewhere. You're still looking at this from within the fictional universe, instead of from the real-world perspective of collective works of fiction. And you have to compare the impact of each work of fiction on the real world, not the impact that each work internally claims for itself on those other works of fiction. The game creators have no power over the notability of their creations. They can write whatever "important" story they want for him (he hand-built both Death Stars with one arm tied behind his back, he knocked the second sun into the Tatooine system by sneezing, he created Hutts by genetically engineering clones of Yoda), but until it gets incorporated and repeated into other media, or acquires the attention of a widespread audience, it's still nothing more than a story within that one game, and notable only to people who played that game or are aware of its details. Postdlf 03:33, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Another point: currently the article does not in any way describe how the character interacts with the game player. It just presents a self-contained biography as if it were derived from a novel. I'd expect some if-then descriptions. "If the player attacks Nihilus instead of fleeing..." "If Nihilus is not killed by the player in level four..." Or "the player cannot kill Nihilus, though he will observe the non-player character of Blahblahblah will do so if he survives to level nine..." or whatever. Could you fix that so it doesn't just read like a story, but instead actually describes how the character is interacted with, and how information about him is discovered? Postdlf 03:36, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, there are quite a bit of character articles on Wikipedia - Star Wars and others - that only appear in one medium. And although it may appear to be fancruft, I'd still disagree that it is of zero notability to non-fans.

 * If I feel up to it, I'll attempt to include more content on player interactivity tomorrow. Nufy8 04:40, 21 July 2005 (UTC)


text:
Prairieville

Prairieville may refer to a place in the United States:

 * Prairieville, Alabama, an unincorporated community
 * Prairieville, Louisiana, an unincorporated community
 * Prairieville, Missouri, a ghost town
 * Prairieville, Texas, an unincorporated community
 * Prairieville, Wisconsin, former name of Waukesha
 * Prairieville Township, Michigan
 * Prairieville Township, Minnesota
 * Prairieville Township, Pike County, Missouri

title: Prairieville


text:
User talk:Muggle~enwiki

''This is the talkpage of User:Muggle. For the article, click here.''

Notes - please read before posting:
 * Always sign and date your messages
 * Please don't start more than one "threat" about the same topic.
 * Please answer notes I leave you on your talkpage here, if they're in reply to something you've posted here. So if you post something here, and I reply, you reply here not there, if you see what I mean...oh, forget it!

Muggle
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:25, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

 * Sorry I didn't give a better explanation, I reverted your edit to Muggle, because it was just a link to your own user page; See User page - user details are not considered encyclopedic content. Cheers. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:31, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Muggle. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Muggle~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Muggle~enwiki


text:
List of storms named Olivia

The name Olivia has been used for ten tropical cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Ocean.

 * Hurricane Olivia (1967) – Category 3 hurricane that struck Baja California causing significant damage
 * Hurricane Olivia (1971) – Category 3 hurricane, reached Baja California as a depression; continuation of Atlantic Hurricane Irene
 * Hurricane Olivia (1975) – Category 3 hurricane, caused significant damage in the Mexican state of Sinaloa
 * Hurricane Olivia (1978) – Category 1 hurricane that made landfall east of Salina Cruz; continuation of Atlantic Hurricane Greta
 * Hurricane Olivia (1982) – powerful Category 4 hurricane that stayed at sea, its remnants brought rain to California
 * Hurricane Olivia (1994) – another powerful Category 4 hurricane that stayed at sea
 * Tropical Storm Olivia (2000) – strong tropical storm that stayed at sea
 * Tropical Storm Olivia (2006) – weak tropical storm, formed in the open ocean
 * Tropical Storm Olivia (2012) – moderate tropical storm that stayed at sea
 * Hurricane Olivia (2018) – low-end Category 4 hurricane, made landfall in Hawaii as a tropical storm

The name Olivia has been used for one tropical cyclone in the Australian region.
 * Cyclone Olivia (1996) – an intense Category 4 tropical cyclone that made landfall in western Australia

The name Olivia has been used for one European Windstorm in Europe
 * Storm Olivia (2024) - A European Windstorm That Affected Western Europe

title: List of storms named Olivia


text:
List of storms named Orlene

The name Orlene has been used for six tropical cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Ocean:

 * Tropical Storm Orlene (1970) – short-lived tropical storm that hit eastern Oaxaca
 * Hurricane Orlene (1974) – Category 2 hurricane that made landfall in northwestern Mexico; continuation of Hurricane Fifi which crossed from the Atlantic into the Pacific
 * Hurricane Orlene (1986) – a Category 1 hurricane that remained far from land
 * Hurricane Orlene (1992) – powerful Category 4 hurricane that made landfall on the Big Island of Hawaii as a tropical depression
 * Hurricane Orlene (2016) – Category 2 hurricane which formed in the open ocean
 * Hurricane Orlene (2022) – low-end Category 4 hurricane that struck southern Sinaloa causing minor damage

title: List of storms named Orlene


text:
File:The pillows - KOOL SPICE.jpg

Licensing
Album cover for KOOL SPICE by the pillows.

title: File:The pillows - KOOL SPICE.jpg


text:
United Mine Workers of America v. Bagwell

United Mine Workers of America v. Bagwell, 512 U.S. 821 (1994), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court laid out the constitutional limitations for the use of contempt powers by courts.

Facts
A trial court enjoined striking unions in Virginia from undertaking certain unlawful activities (throwing things, threatening, obstructing, and picketing without supervision); when union members repeatedly violated the injunction, the trial court established a schedule of $100,000 fine for future violent breaches, $20,000 fine for future non-violent breaches; after more violations of the injunction, the trial court ended up assessing $64 million, including $12 million to the plaintiff in the civil case and $52 million to the county and the commonwealth of Virginia. The parties settled, but the trial court refused to vacate the fines to be paid to the county and commonwealth. The Virginia appellate court reversed the trial court, but the Virginia Supreme Court reversed the appellate court. Appeal was then taken to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Issue
Were these fines civil, or were they criminal (in which case due process and jury would be required)?

Opinion of the Court
The Court, in an opinion by Justice Blackmun, held that a contempt sanction is civil if it is remedial and for the benefit of the complainant—if it either coerces the defendant into compliance with the court’s order or compensates the complainant for losses sustained. But where a fine is not compensatory, it is civil only if the contemnor is afforded an opportunity to "purge" (avoid or reduce fine through compliance); otherwise, it is criminal contempt.

Therefore, there could be no compensation to the plaintiff as there was no opportunity for the defendant to purge the contempt. Therefore, these were criminal fines, which required appropriate due process—a trial by jury—which had not been afforded.

Justice Scalia wrote a concurring opinion, expressing concern about the judge also acting as rulemaker and enforcer. Justice Ginsburg also wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist, further elucidating the distinction between civil and criminal fines.


text:
List of storms named Patricia

The name Patricia was used for five tropical cyclones in the Eastern Pacific and once in the Western Pacific. It has also been used once for a European windstorm.

In the East Pacific:
 * Hurricane Patricia (1970) – Category 2 hurricane that remained in the open ocean
 * Hurricane Patricia (1974) – Category 1 hurricane that remained at sea
 * Hurricane Patricia (2003) – Category 1 hurricane that also remained far from land
 * Tropical Storm Patricia (2009) – briefly affected parts of Baja California Sur, causing no damage
 * Hurricane Patricia (2015) – an intense Category 5 hurricane that became the strongest storm ever recorded in the Western Hemisphere, the second-strongest worldwide in terms of pressure, and the strongest in terms of 1-minute sustained winds

After the 2015 storm, the name Patricia was retired and replaced with Pamela for the 2021 season.

In the Western Pacific: In Europe:
 * Typhoon Patricia (1949) – a Category 4 typhoon that passed near Japan

 * Storm Patricia

title: List of storms named Patricia


text:
Madge Weinstein

Madge Bertha Weinstein is a fictional Internet personality who maintains Yeast Radio, which has developed a cult following and was among the 50 most-subscribed-to podcasts in 2005. Weinstein is the creation and alter ego of underground filmmaker Richard Bluestein and was described by USA Today as "representative of the type of over-the-top content that would never see the light of day at a mainstream media outlet".

Although Weinstein is a fictional character (and never admitted as such), the majority of opinions, social-political commentary and oblique characteristics of her personality are clearly reflective of Bluestein's own. In essence, Weinstein is both an extension and distortion of Bluestein's actual personality.

Character history
Weinstein is an outspoken breast cancer survivor and opinionated Jewish lesbian activist. She is a Vassar College graduate, a "woman of Luna" and claims to be a co-founder of the Lilith Fair. She was also the band manager of the now disbanded riot grrrl rock group, 'Goddess Riot Juice'. She is the self-professed "Margaret Mead of podcasting" as she is an amateur cultural anthropologist who, in her free time, studies the sordid sexual activities of homosexual men. She is well known for her advocacy on a variety of women's issues including her long tenure as a spokeswoman on behalf of women suffering from vaginal yeast. Weinstein also suffers from food allergies and fibromyalgia.

Weinstein is the daughter of Irving Weinstein, a funeral director and owner of Weinstein & Schlump Funeral Homes. She grew up in the Grand Concourse in the borough of the Bronx in New York City. She is the former lover of Ethel Merman (although she tends to exaggerate the details of their now infamous 1967 tryst during Ethel's daughter's funeral) and has had affairs with Martina Navratilova, Ellen DeGeneres, k.d. lang, Melissa Etheridge and Rosie O'Donnell. In her youth, she claims to have performed oral sex on Nancy Reagan which she now regrets. Weinstein's most notable lesbian relationship was with Gussie Iscowicz (the alter ego of Bluestein's late partner Juan Montealegre), an elderly hairdresser living in Miami, Florida who suffered from Alzheimer's. For many years, Weinstein edited gay pornography for an urban audience (for a company known only as 'the Dorm'). She currently resides in Miami, Florida with her Italian greyhound Trotsky.

Biography
Weinstein co-manages the sister site, Insane Films, which features personal video blogs of Madge's alter ego, Richard Bluestein, as well as features by underground filmmakers and miscellaneous visual content. Insane Films is one of the earliest videoblogs ever created, originating sometime in 2000. However, Madge Weinstein's fame grew largely from her indie podcast Yeast Radio, which began in late November 2004. Weinstein gained notoriety for her viral video, Cooking With Madge: Lesbians On Acid, which featured a disheveled Madge and her unstable, ambiguously gendered friends attempting to cook "les beans" while high on LSD. A pioneer of the podcasting medium, Adam Curry, helped promote the show in its early life. In late April 2005, Weinstein created Yeast2, a free-form experimental channel in which "anyone (could) contribute to the strange, ugly, pretty macabra [sic] and surreal." Yeast2 closed in 2008.

In early July 2005, Weinstein became one of the first members of Adam Curry's PodShow and was featured heavily in the program, which aired on Sirius Satellite Radio from 6-10 p.m. EST on weekdays before the company's ties with the radio network were controversially severed on May 1, 2007. Weinstein's contract with PodShow ended in April 2008.

Around the same time, Madge Weinstein co-created Eat This Hot Show a collaborative podcast featuring five notable members of the ever-growing "queercast" community: Weinstein, Ragan Fox, Wanda Wisdom, Fausto Fernos and his partner Marc Felion. However, Fausto and Marc were expelled from the show after ten episodes due to internal conflicts with fellow hosts, and the three featured a weekly guest in the episodes following. The show eventually dissipated in this format although, in April 2008, the show was revived with Madge, Wanda and new co-host Auntie Vera Charles. As of 2014, after another hiatus and the departure of Auntie Vera Charles, new episodes are being recorded sporadically with current co-hosts Ragan Fox and Wanda Wisdom. Madge Weinstein and Wanda Wisdom also co-created the online community Qpodder.org, which collects podcasts by gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people or characters. Sibling site NellyGator.com allows listeners to subscribe to a single RSS feed containing all podcast episodes from the members of Qpodder. In mid-October 2005, Weinstein, a self-described "pioneering lesbian," began heavily promoting the medium of queer video blogging to coincide with the advent of the video iPod. Her new endeavor Faggregator.com does to videoblogging what Nellygator did for podcasting, and features a single page which houses all the video material submitted by members of the Qpodder community.

Bluestein experienced two personal losses in 2006. Juan Montealegre died on February 11, 2006, after a battle with cancer. Not long thereafter, on May 2, 2006, his 14-year-old dog Chauncey, a heavy fixture on the show in its early days including a memorable episode where Weinstein angrily cleaned up his feces, also died. On September 27, 2006, Richard Bluestein announced on Yeast Radio that he was retiring the character Madge and taking over hosting duties himself due to creative concerns. Madge was reported to be in a hospital in Guadalajara, Mexico, where she received adjustable gastric band surgery for her ongoing weight problem. The surgery went horribly wrong, leaving her in a critical condition. Madge eventually recovered and returned to the show on November 7, 2006.

In early January 2008, with the threat of her expiring PodShow contract, Weinstein relaunched Yeast Radio as a live show, airing on her website from 10:00 CT on Fridays. The live format continued until the end of May 2008 when Weinstein decided to return to a more free-form, unscheduled format. In early 2009, Weinstein resumed streaming live shows sporadically. The 1000th episode of Yeast Radio was streamed live on February 12, 2010.

Weinstein's rebellious, queer punk ethics and her podcast's unconventional content, strong, coarse language and stream-of-consciousness structure have made her an endlessly controversial icon within the more conservative podcasting community. Her show serves as an ongoing protest against censorship, the commercialization of mainstream radio and the continued marginalization of gays and lesbians by the growing monoculture.

Notable guests
Weinstein features a variety of vulgar but eccentric characters on her show. Some frequent contributors:

 * Sylvia Browne, a famous psychic who is now a bloated corpse, who could never quite find her purse. Her spirit lives on and is continuously celebrated by Madge Weinstein in the form of audio clips.
 * Berbacia Clemons, a Los Angeles-based "big, black, bloated, bisexual, bipolar, overweight blesbian blacktress" who sporadically guests on the show to "peel open the pussy lips of Hollywood", allowing the audience to have a "peek inside". She is often delusional and obsesses over certain celebrities, in particular former talk show host Star Jones (whom she views as her stalker and her "only competition"), her "lesbian lover" Oprah Winfrey and her "close friends" Michael Jackson and Elizabeth Taylor.
 * Cher, the glamorous and unhinged singer, actress, part time yoga teacher and close friend of Madge. Talks constantly and proudly about her transgender son "Chazzie".
 * Grizelda, a panty-pooping marathon runner and Madge's close friend who shares her interests in obesity and the bizarre. Grizelda (Shishaldin Hanlen) is also a provocative multimedia performance artist, world cake-eating champion and sports coach who made headlines in 2004 for invoking an obscure clause in the French civil code and petitioning the government for permission to marry the long deceased French surrealist poet Comte de Lautréamont.
 * Victoria LaMarr, a schizophrenic transgender crack whore with multiple personalities who appeared heavily in Weinstein's infamous Lesbians On Acid trilogy and in early episodes of Yeast Radio. She went on to play a larger part in the Feast of Fools podcast. Victoria (Matthew Bogseth) died from complications of HIV/AIDS in November 2013.
 * Rachel Kann, an emo/gothic performance poet and 'new age' spiritual healer. Her trademark is her deep, robust voice with inflections that suggest she is continuously relieving her bowels. Madge's chemistry and banter with her is very popular with listeners and she enjoys a cult following.
 * Ali Mahajani, also known as Ali My Vagina, an Indian man who enjoys sticking unusual objects in his urethra. He is estranged from his amputee wife after a complication from sexual intercourse. He soon went on to play a large role in Cheryl's Whorehole podcast and is part of the That Is Real Good Tech podcast with Rob Average Penis.
 * Andy Melton, later known as Schrockbella Mortenstein, a housebound gay twenty-something with the unique predicament of hyper morbid obesity. From his father's house in Tennessee, he formerly hosted the podcast "Andy Not Andrew" and unsuccessfully launched the program "Sissy Fried" under the pseudonym, Declan Channing. He has since left his home and podcasting to pursue a romantic relationship with a man known to listeners only as 'Yellow Fatty'.
 * Cheryl Trig Merkowski, a self-described beautiful, paedophilic 25-year-old woman, smoker and owner of three fourths of a lung. Though she makes a point to introduce herself as such, it seems clear that she is much older than she lets on. Cheryl speaks obsessively about her prolapsed vagina, feces, urine, abortions, semen, African Americans, her prized Cadillac Cimarron and the children at the daycare centre that she runs. She has a croaky and aged voice, the results of excessive tobacco smoking and lung cancer. She also tans obsessively to the point that her skin has become very leathery. She worked under Oprah Winfrey (with whom she has a bizarre, masochistic relationship) and was caught up in a global conspiracy of celebrities pooping their panties. She has many famous 'sisters', including psychic Sylvia Browne, former governor Jan Brewer and controversial celebrity chef Paula Deen. Originally only appearing on the show sporadically she has grown to become a full-fledged co-host. In February 2014, her music video "Walls Fall Out", a song about vaginal and anal prolapse, went viral.
 * The Abortion Hotline Girls, a series of bewildered anti-abortion hotline workers who befriend and attempt to help poor Cheryl and Debra through their various pregnancies and troubles.
 * Hagatha von Taterbugs, a gleefully disgusting HIV positive drag queen with borderline personality disorder who hangs out in public restrooms and drinks sewage. Her trashy exploits and long history of atrocities have shocked and astounded even Madge and Cheryl. Cheryl despises Hagatha and undercuts her at every turn.
 * Debra Wilkerson, an elderly, insane Christian woman who thinks Madge and Cheryl need to "get saved". She had a complete mental breakdown after the television show The Facts Of Life was cancelled and talks endlessly about "Natalie", "Jo" and the "GURLS". After smoking copious amounts of chiffon, she developed multiple personalities, most notably as Heather Feather, a South Californian teen girl who frequents phone sex lines and has many strange boyfriends. Heather's most notable boyfriend is Fill, a foul mouthed, mentally handicapped pervert who talks obsessively about his 'cream'. She also has a gay grandson who burns crosses in her backyard in tribute to Madonna. Like Cheryl, she has grown to become a full-time co-host on the show.
 * Kathy, a dominant transsexual lesbian whom the gurrrlls randomly found through a phone sex hotline. Kathy is borderline bankrupt and not-so-secretly wants Heather's sugardaddy funding. However, Heather eventually became homeless, much to Kathy's dismay, and lost all the money forcing Heather to live in her car. Kathy constantly berates Heather for being mildly retarded in nature. From the phone calls between Kathy and Heather, it is clear that Kathy needs Jesus. Not to mention needing to learn what being a lesbian is all about...
 * Angela Beasley, a sassy worker at Kerry Laundry in Oakland Park, Florida whom the guuuurlls like to mess with on occasion. She charges 95¢ a pound for laundry and refuses to wash anything with feces or BM in it. Angela has a boss named Ms. Tracy whom can never "guess what." Ms. Beasley also has a fetish for lobster dinner, and never received her voucher for one due to Matt Peter's unfortunate demise. Odds are Angela is still waiting expectantly for "Listenin' Radio Radio Yeast" to send her her complementary lobster dinner...not realizing that her waiting is as pointless as her waiting for Godot.

The show regularly features audio clips involving psychic Sylvia Browne, feminist writer Helen Gurley Brown, Big Meets Bigger, My Strange Addiction and other television programs about morbid obesity and bizarre personal habits.

Weinstein has also interviewed political activist Cindy Sheehan, Wigstock founder Lady Bunny, Democracy Now! reporter Amy Goodman, pioneer of the transgressive art movement Nick Zedd, collaborative documentary filmmaker Kent Bye of The Echo Chamber Project and the experimental, underground filmmakers Usama Alshaibi and Kristie Alshaibi. The show frequently features original compositions from Taylor E. Ross (described as Madge's "cunt doctor"), the mysterious "Mr. Zeeche" and Dave from the Chub Creek's podcast. Because of her prominence within the community, Madge also regularly features fellow queer podcasters on her show such as Ragan Fox, Wanda Wisdom, Auntie Vera Charles, Lady Raptastic and Rebecca Nay.

title: Madge Weinstein


text:
User:Patrick R.W.A. R.

My name is Patrick Roovers

I was born October 7th, 1969 in Brasschaat, Belgium.

title: User:Patrick R.W.A. R.


text:
Talk:Charles Fox Parham

Dispute Tags
I placed a "dispute" notice here because the assertions that Parham was a KKK member and other charges need a proper and acceptable source to reference to.

The historical accuracy and POV of this article really needs some work. Stating that someone in one of his meetings was the first person to speak in tongues since NT times is riduculously POV.Coffeeboy 19:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I don't care enough about this topic to hunt out a WP:RS, but I have a well-referenced paper presented at an academic conference (on linguistics) that suggests that is the case. Rather than calling it "ridiculously POV", you might wish to consider that "truth is stranger than fiction". --Limegreen 22:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Much of what people hold as truth is disputed by others: the creation, evolution, that green tea heals all manner of ailments, and that exercise will heal many eye problems. We are not here to dispute the validity of "speaking in tongues"; we are here to write what was said to have happened, as originally written by those who were there.  Sources repeating that this is what are too numerous to name.  The only way to dispute it is to find someone who said it did not happen at that particular moment, then give their point of view as well.  Raina 01:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * The validity of speaking in tongues is not in question, it is the claim that this was the first person to have done so in approximately 2000 years. There are plenty of groups that practiced it including the Anabaptists.  Coffeeboy 18:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I agree. I did not know about the Anabaptists (in fact, this surprises me), but I know that various forms of "tongues" have been practiced for centuries among those of many different religions.  Raina 08:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Parham was indeed a member of the KKK. I am going to remove the dispute tag and the npov tags because I rewrote the entire article and gave 6-7 references, including a credible news source. Эйрон Кинни  (t) 23:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

The issue of tongues is not something that was started in post NT times by the Parham people. The 3rd Century had a group called the Montanists who were the antiquated equivalent group of the Pentecostals. They also had the same issue of confounding scripture with personal experience and elevating them above scriptural and sound objectivity. --Zaphnathpaaneah 02:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC) _______________________

It is good to question.

I had written my comments based upon reading I had done, but the books were not mine. The following are a few Internet sites I found tonight regarding the subject. (I have edited them in order to avoid copyright problems):

1. www.israel3.com/article501.html [Em] 1910, o pastor Charles Fox Parham,. . . membro da KKK (Ku Klux Klan) Translation: "In 1910, Pastor Charles Fox Parham, an assumed racist, became a member of KKK (Ku Klux Klan)"

2. www.alumcreek.org/Bible%20Studies/HSAP.doc "Parham . . . to be part of the KKK."

3. www.spirithome.com/histpen1.html ; other. "Parham . . . was an example . . . problems . . . throughout Pentecostalist history : racism, authoritarianism, and sexual scandal."

4. http://www.jewishdefenseleague.org/pdf/terror_johnson1.pdf "In 1907, he [Parham] was accused of sodomy in San Antonio, Texas, . . . While the charges were later dropped, . . . Parham . . . confession: . . . did not remember what might have happened in his sleep."

5. http://www.bible.ca/tongues-encyclopedia-pentecostal-preachers.htm#parham "In 1907, Parham was arrested and charged with sodomy . . . and lost all credibility. . . ."

6. http://www.davidicke.net/religiousfrauds/pentecostal/moralfrauds.html "In 1907, Parham was arrested and charged with sodomy. . . . Parham was also a racist."

7. http://www.acns.com/~mm9n/Baptism/910.htm "Parham . . . was involved in racism, . . and sexual scandal."

8. http://enterhisrest.org/entry_directions/his_rest_03.pdf "First, . . . Parham’s ministry . . . rocked by public scandal. Then one of . . . Seymour’s . . . workers . . . made off with the . . . mailing lists for [the]publication, setting up her own publication (with the purloined mailing list – still calling it The Apostolic Faith!) . . . . [No more] Seymour-authorized copies of the Azusa Street magazine went forth, . . . attendance fell off and the . . . Los Angeles work fell into decline."

I keep finding more and more references, but I will stop there. Raina 07:46, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

The Ku Klux Klan was in decline from 1868 to 1870, and was destroyed in the early 1870s by President Ulysses S. Grant's vigorous action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act), according the Wikipedia .org. The Klan wasn't revived until 1915. According to Wikipedia's bio on Charles Fox Parham, he didn't the join the Klan until 1910. The Klan didn't come into existance till 5 years later.

_______________________

= I have been interested in the Klan for years and have read the writings of many authorities on the Klan. One of the things they have emphasized is that from the beginning of the Klan, they have never died out at any time from their beginning. If I have time, I will find some of such writings. Raina

_______________________

== The following are exerpts from the first Internet site ("Klu Klux Klan": http://www.iupui.edu/~aao/kkk.html) I came across this morning. I don't have time to do further research at this time, so this will suffice for now. (Emphasis mine)

The section is "The KKK's First Death." The leaders of the Klan realized that the order's end was at hand, at least as any sort of organized force. It is widely believed that Forrest ordered the Klan disbanded in January 1869, but the surviving document is rather ambiguous (some historians think Forrest's 'order' was just a trick so he could deny responsibility or knowledge of Klan atrocities).

Whatever the actual date, it is clear that as an organized body across the South, the KKK had ceased to exist by the end of 1869. That did not end the violence, however, and as atrocities became more widespread, Radical legislatures throughout the region passed harsher laws, imposed martial law in some Klan-dominated counties, and actively hunted Klan leaders. . ..

Hundreds of Klansmen were arrested but few actually went to prison.

These laws probably dampened the enthusiasm for the Klan, but they can hardly be credited with destroying it. The fact was, by the mid- 1870's white Southerners had retaken control of most Southern state governments and didn't need the Klan as much as before.

When I have time, I will pull out some of my other resources. Raina 16:31, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

________________________

In continuation of my statement above: It was written here, by an unidentified person, that "under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act), according the Wikipedia .org. The Klan wasn't revived until 1915." While the above is true, I contend that officially ending the Klan on paper and to the general public did not actually end the Klan. I just happened to run across the following, in two Wikipedia articles, as I was looking for something else (emphasis mine): ". . . . Edward Douglass White (3 November 1845 – 19 May 1921), American politician and jurist, was a United States Senator, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the ninth Chief Justice of the United States. He was best known for formulating the rule of reason standard of anti-trust law. Along with Hugo Black, he is one of two Supreme Court justices known to have been members of the Ku Klux Klan.[1] . . .."

". . . .In 1915, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Edward Douglass White fondly recounted to Thomas Dixon that he had been a member of the Klan.[1] . . .." Raina 15:30, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

________________________

Truth can be very hard on people. Many churches and church members would rather live in and teach fallacies than truth, yet the L-rd declards that He is Truth. We should, then, value it far above our feelings and discomfort. The page definitely deserves the dispute now. With these edits, done by a nameless person, likely a sock puppet, who has only made two contributions (both to this page)with this number, I join in that dispute.

Furthermore, it was not Parham who started the Los Angeles Apostolic Faith Mission; it was William Joseph Seymour. From William Seymour, an article in Wikipedia:

 * William Joseph Seymour (2 May 1870 - 28 September 1922) was an African American minister, and an initiator of the Pentecostal religious movement.

 * Born the son of freed slaves in Centerville, Louisiana, Seymour developed a belief in glossolalia ("speaking in tongues") as a confirmation of the gifts of the Holy Spirit. As a consequence of teaching this, he was removed from the Los Angeles parish where he had formerly ministered. Looking for a place to continue his work, he found a run-down building in downtown Los Angeles located on Azusa Street, and preached his doctrinal beliefs there.

 * The result was the Azusa Street Revival. Seymour not only rejected the existing racial barriers in favor of "unity in Christ", he also rejected the then almost-universal barriers to women in any form of church leadership. This revival meeting extended from 1906 until 1909, and became the subject of intense investigation by more mainstream Protestants....

Raina 00:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

_________________________

Parham was certainly not the founder of the Los Angeles apastolic mission. It was founded by William Seymour and Frank Bartleman. Bartelman's autobiography, before going off into a ramble about the brethern movement is very clear on the role of Parham, and his doctrine that was in keeping with the views of the KKK. Rick Joyner, in his biograpy of Parham notes that he visited the mission, but it was about one year after the mission was started. He was however a mentor to Seymour. Joyner also notes the KKK connection.

I'll fill in more details once I get all the info together, but it seems to me fairly clear the roles that Seymour, Bartleman and Parham played in the Azusa Street revival, and the formation of the Pentecostal movement.

mykuhl

It seems obvious that Parham was the key influence to Seymour's establishment of Pentecostalism. In addition, it's not right to call this article biased against Parham, merely because it cites information that paints him in an unfavorable light. There is no doubt that Parham was racist and a member of the KKK. I would like to mention that the abuse of the NPOV rule has created only favorable content in articles with varying levels of controversy. It is not right to cry "bias" whenever one sees an article mentioning something factual about someone we like or admire. The Mormon articles on Joseph Smith are perhaps the most extreme examples of this abuse. --Zaphnathpaaneah 05:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

_______________________

Limegreen, I am sure you must mean well, but when you wrote that "William Seymour, having observed the phenomonen in Topeka, took the phenomenon to Los Angeles, but was locked out of the Apostolic Faith Mission because of their rejection of speaking in tongues. This lead to the development of the Azusa Street Revival. When Parkham came to visit Seymour in Los Angeles," it was in error. Reread the history -- it was a different church he was locked out of. When Seymour came to LA, he started the Apostolic Faith Mission, staying there until he died, at which time his wife headed the church. He was not locked out, and the Apostolic Faith Mission never rejected tongues but embraced it. The Apostolic Faith Mission was on Azusa Street and initially contained the so-called "Azusa Street Revival." When Parham (not Parkham) came to visit it, it was he who left it. Raina 16:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I am sure you must mean well. Good faith includes not being too condescending.
 * If you re-read your original edit of my edit, you'll see that you removed the wiki-link to Seymour and removed the link as to why Seymour was relevent to Parham (Seymour having been in Topeka before LA). I'm happy to accept that it was a different church that he was locked out of (I really have no idea about any of this). However, as you are someone who seems very interested in these pages, you might work to add some references to them. Good luck! --Limegreen 23:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I am very sorry, Limegreen. It was in no way my intention to be patronizing; I have no reason to be so.
 * When I did my last edit, I was more careful than I was with the previous one, in an attempt to make sure that what was relevant and factual remained.
 * As I mentioned earlier, the books I had used for research were borrowed several years ago, and I no longer have access to them. I have, however, found several sites (some of which are listed above) on the Internet that say basically the same things.
 * Parham was just not that important, in my humble opinion, to merit a lot of mentions in historical writings; his importance seems to be limited to only those who wish to make a point with regard to his influence, whether positive or negative.
 * Again, I apologize for coming across as condescending toward you. Raina 04:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Your last edit worked better, and my only source was a webpage, so I apologize for my mistake. I'm not to familiar with this history, so I can't comment on Parham's significance in the grand scheme of things. As a linguist, his involvement in the revival of glossolalia seems notable, but beyond that I wouldn't know. --Limegreen 06:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

 * No problem -- and thank you! Raina 23:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I have a copy of the Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements, Regency/Zondervan, 1988. The author of the articles PARHAM, CHARLES FOX and APOSTOLIC FAITH (BAXTER SPRINGS, KANS.) is James R. Goff, Jr. Ph.D., University of Arkansas - Fayetteville; Lecturer in History, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina.

He mentions the sodomy charge, but not the KKK. Apparently, the sodomy charge happened in the summer of 1907 in San Antonio, Texas. The charges were dropped by the authorities.

It is also stated that the bad press against Parham came from a man named Wilbur Voliva, about whom I know nothing.

The bibliography includes a book called Life of Charles F. Parham by S. Parham (1930).

Hope this helps.

This story gets stranger and stranger. Apparently Wilbur Glenn Voliva and John Alexander Dowie promoted the Flat Earth theory in their Zion City ministry. Both Parham and John D. Lake seem to have had some connection, though it may have been tangential.

How many of the founders of Pentecostalism, if any, agreed with the Flat Earth theory of the Dowie movement, is uncertain. But they must have known about it.

I have just had a look through James R Goff's, Fields White unto Harvest: Charles F Parham and the Missionary Origins of Pentecostalism University of Arkansas Press, (1988). In it there is referenbce to Parham's racial ideology (particularly segregation and supprt of the Crow laws) which by contemporary standards would be labelled racist however he notes that it was nothing out of the ordinary. Goff concludes that "his concern was paternalistic but, in the context of the day, he could hardly be considered a 'racist' (p 107-108).

Regarding the KKK Goff does not make any claim that Parham was a member although he does state (p 157) that Parham's experience at Asuza Street hardened his views and by the 1920s "Parham felt no qualms at offering high praise for the reorganized Ku Klux Klan ... Parham admired many Klan leaders but considered their efforts ultimately fruitlesssince they lacked a purely spiritual agenda".

Hope this helps.

Mightyfish

I am always troubled by opinions and speculation being presented as though they were fact. I found very little verifiable information in this article and it immediately presented itself as a citation of opposition instead of an historical accounting. There are too many might have beens, could have beens, and possiblies to give any credibility to this article.

Plagiarism
This former version of the article was plagiarized from http://charles-fox-parham.biography.ms/. So, I rewrote it, with references and footnotes. Эйрон Кинни (t) 00:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

 * It was not plagiarized. I wrote it after consulting several works. Raina 06:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

 * The page content was copied from Wikipedia (which is acknowledged in the small print at the bottom of the page -- actually an image rather than text, however). And please assume good faith, everybody can make mistakes!

 * --Limegreen 22:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Sorry, I apologize. I was mistaken, I did not see the fine print. Эйрон Кинни  (t) 21:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Thank you.Raina 04:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

 * The former. Эйрон Кинни  (t) 20:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Baiting and switching
I took these comments out:

"For these comments, Parham has been deemed a racist." and "Another widespread belief relating to Parham's racial attitudes is that he was a Klansman."

These comments are reflective of a tactic known as weasaling. The use of the words in a seemingly neutral fashion only to pre-emptively prop up a POV stance. In this instance the stance is decidedly against the data that suggests that Parham was a racist. The facts alone (which are left in the article) are sufficient to speak for themselves, and do not need preliminary " say it ain't so" commentary. --Zaphnathpaaneah 12:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Remove it if you want. It doesn't matter to me, but I'd just like to make clear I was trying to be neutral on that issue. Aaрон Кинни  (t) 03:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

This article needs help
I added the Tone Cleanup tag to the "Allegations of Racism" section.

Someone needs to take the initiative and clean up this article. It is too complicated, and the "Controversy" section in particular is long, complicated, contradictory at points, and difficult for someone who is unfamiliar with this topic to understand. I don't have the knowledge to rewrite this article, but someone who does know something about it needs to rewrite it. Also, the "Controversy" section needs to be rewritten from an unbiased point of view, giving both sides of the story but not endorsing either side. The readers of the article don't need to know every bit of evidence for and against either side, they just need to know that there are two sides to the story, and they need to know the basic premise of each side's argument. Right now, it is very clear that people on both sides of the argument have been editing and re-editing this section until it is basically a jumble of nonsense. Thanks, Sherlock (talk) 04:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

The real founder of pentecostalism
Beyond any doubt, the racist, gay and pastor Charles Fox Parham was the real founder of pentecostalism. In countries such as Brazil, El Salvador, Mexico, pentecostalism] is the second biggest [[religion.Agre22 (talk) 18:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)agre22

The above post by user Agre22 is just the sort of unsupported POV that is being discussed here as being a problem: <"Beyond any doubt, the racist, gay and pastor Charles Fox Parham was the real founder of pentecostalism."> This is against Wikipedia's Talk Page Guidelines, which state, "Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject," "Stay objective: Talk pages are not a forum for editors to argue their personal point of view about a controversial issue," and "Deal with facts: The talk page is the ideal place for issues relating to verification, such as asking for help finding sources, discussing conflicts or inconsistencies among sources, and examining the reliability of references."

As to Agre22's unsupported charge of racism, the 1906 revival in Los Angeles, California, (the Azusa Street revival), was begun by a black woman, Lucy Farrow (who had the "tongues" experience), sent, with funds, by Charles Parham from his school, (then in Houston, Texas), and a black man, W. J. Seymour (who had not yet had this Holy Ghost baptism with "speaking with tongues" experience, but did later ), also sent, with funds, by Charles Parham and his school, (at Lucy Farrow's request for help), ; '. Lucy Farrow also returned to preach at the Houston "Apostolic Faith Movement" Camp Meeting, at which "Brothers Parham and Carrothers were in charge," in August, 1906, as eyewitness Howard Goss recounts in his wife's book, The Winds of God, "Fresh from the revival in Los Angeles, Sister Lucy Farrow returned to attend this Camp Meeting. Although a Negro, she was received as a messenger from the Lord to us, even in the deep south of Texas."

As for Agre22's unsupported charge of homosexuality, per revival-library.org : "In July 1907, Parham was preaching in a former Zion mission located in San Antonio when a story reported in the San Antonio Light made national news. Its headline read: 'Evangelist Is Arrested. C. F. Parham, Who Has Been Prominent in Meeting Here, Taken Into Custody.' The report said Parham, about 40 and J.J. Jourdan, 22, had been charged with committing ‘an unnatural offence’ (sodomy), a felony under Texas statute 524. Faithful friends provided $1,000 bail and Parham was released, announcing to his followers that he had been framed by his Zion City opponent, Wilbur Voliva. At the time of his arrest Parham was preaching at the San Antonio mission which was pastored by Lemuel C. Hall, a former disciple of Dowie. The church had once belonged to Zion, but left the Zion association and joined Parham’s Apostolic Faith Movement. Parham pledged to clear his name and refused suggestions to leave town to avoid prosecution. Subsequently, on July 24th the case was dismissed, 'the prosecuting attorney declaring that there was absolutely no evidence which merited legal recognition.' Parham’s name disappeared from the headlines of secular newspapers as quickly as it appeared. There is now overwhelming evidence that no formal indictment was ever filed. There is no record of the incident at the Bexar County Courthouse, as the San Antonio Police Department routinely disposed of such forms in instances of case dismissal." (emphasis mine) Dword2Dwise (talk) 21:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Dword2Dwise
 * Hey Dword2Dwise, just to let you know, User: Agre22 was indefinitely blocked back in January 2010 for repeatedly adding POV and original research to articles. So, no need to worry about his POV anymore.  Howicus (talk) 22:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Admission of Homosexuality
The assertion that "Parham at first admitted his actions, but then denied them. " is disputable, as the reference makes absolutely no mention of this. The only reference made to this incident in Synan's book is: One possible reason why Seymour rejected his authority was the rumour that Parham was a practicing homosexual, a charge often made and repeatedly denied by Parham (footnote #43) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iskuo (talk • contribs) 11:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 11:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Charles Fox Parham


text:
List of storms named Paul

The name Paul has been used for twelve tropical cyclones worldwide.

In the Eastern Pacific:
 * Tropical Storm Paul (1978) – made landfall in western Mexico.
 * Hurricane Paul (1982) – killed over 1,000 in Central America.
 * Tropical Storm Paul (1994) – never threatened land.
 * Tropical Storm Paul (2000) – made landfall in Hawaii as a tropical depression.
 * Hurricane Paul (2006) – made landfall in Mexico as a tropical depression.
 * Hurricane Paul (2012) – threatened Baja California, but weakened before landfall.
 * Tropical Storm Paul (2018) – never threatened land.

In the Western Pacific:
 * Tropical Storm Paul (1999) (T9908, 12W)

In the Southern Hemisphere:
 * Cyclone Paul (1980)
 * Cyclone Paul (2000)
 * Cyclone Paul (2010)
 * Cyclone Paul (2024)

title: List of storms named Paul


text:
User:WiIfried Derksen

I deleted the content of this page, since it is not more then a rediredct to my user page. WiIfried Derksen is not the same as Wilfried Derksen. Electionworld 22:09, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User:WiIfried Derksen


text:
List of storms named Pauline

The name Pauline was used for four tropical cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Ocean:

 * Tropical Storm Pauline (1961), remained well out at sea
 * Hurricane Pauline (1968), made landfall on Baja California
 * Hurricane Pauline (1985), threatened Hawaii
 * Hurricane Pauline (1997), a Category 4 hurricane that made landfall in Mexico, killing between 230 and 500 people, and causing 447.8 million (1997 USD) in damage.

Following the hurricane in 1997, the name Pauline was retired from use in the Eastern Pacific, and replaced with Patricia for the 2003 season.

The name Pauline has also been used for one tropical cyclone in the Western Pacific Ocean:
 * Typhoon Pauline (1947)

title: List of storms named Pauline


text:
William Wegman

William Wegman may refer to:

 * Bill Wegman (William Edward Wegman, born 1962), American baseball player
 * William Wegman (photographer) (born 1943), American artist

title: William Wegman


text:
Billy Silverman

 William Daley (born February 21, 1962) better known by his ring name Billy Silverman, is an American professional wrestling referee who worked for World Championship Wrestling and the World Wrestling Federation and later World Wrestling Entertainment.

Professional wrestling career
Silverman started with the WWF in 1986 and worked there until 1997. Soon after his departure from the WWF, he signed with World Championship Wrestling. He stayed with WCW until the company was purchased by Vince McMahon and the WWE in March 2001. He returned to World Wrestling Entertainment and became a member of The Alliance.

Silverman appeared in the 2000 movie Ready to Rumble and the 2003 movie  Mystic River. And most recently in the 2021 Hollywood International Golden Age Festival Award Winner The Lollipop Gang

Awards and honors

 * Cauliflower Alley Club
 * Charlie Smith Referee's Award (2022)
 * New England Pro Wrestling Hall of Fame
 * Class of 2014

title: Billy Silverman


text:
List of storms named Priscilla

The name Priscilla has been used for nine tropical cyclones worldwide; seven in the Eastern Pacific, and once in the Western Pacific and Australian region.

In the Eastern Pacific:
 * Hurricane Priscilla (1967)
 * Hurricane Priscilla (1971)
 * Tropical Storm Priscilla (1975)
 * Hurricane Priscilla (1983)
 * Tropical Storm Priscilla (1989)
 * Tropical Storm Priscilla (2013)
 * Tropical Storm Priscilla (2019)

In the Western Pacific:
 * Typhoon Priscilla (1946)

In the Australian region:
 * Cyclone Priscilla (1970)

title: List of storms named Priscilla


text:
List of storms named Polo

The name Polo has been used for five tropical cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Ocean.

 * Hurricane Polo (1984), a Category 3 hurricane that struck southern Baja California as a tropical depression
 * Hurricane Polo (1990), a low-end Category 1 hurricane that remained at sea
 * Tropical Storm Polo (2008), a tropical storm that did not threaten land
 * Hurricane Polo (2014), a Category 1 hurricane that paralleled the Mexican coastline but did not make landfall
 * Tropical Storm Polo (2020), a weak late-season tropical storm that remained at sea

title: List of storms named Polo