text:
User talk:Saberwyn

Archive

 * /archive one - July 2005 to January 2006
 * /archive two - January 2006 to June 2006
 * /archive three - June 2006 to May 2007
 * /archive four - May 2007 to July 2008
 * /archive five - August 2008 to June 2009
 * /archive six - July 2009 to December 2010
 * /archive seven - January 2010 to December 2012
 * /archive eight - January 2012 to December 2014

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

 * Collins-class submarine
 * added a link pointing to Saab

 * Collins-class submarine replacement project
 * added a link pointing to Saab

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Gona Barracks and the six-inch gun reportedly from the HMAS Sydney
I have checked with the Qld Maritime Museum, who know nothing about this gun. They say the only six-inch gun they had came from the Cowan battery. So I have removed the reference to the QMM having the gun. But as they nothing of the gun in question, they could not help re the claim about coming from the HMAS Sydney. Not being a military history person, I don't really know where to go next to resolve this. Do you know where we might go? Kerry (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The only Sydney I guns I know of are the ones mentioned at HMAS_Sydney_(1912): 2 at Rottnest Island, one at Thursday Island. The sources I have do not mention any other used main guns from Sydney 1, and no artifacts of any size except a liferaft from Sydney 2. Seeing as the Queensland Heritage Register is the source cited to this questionable claim (and you've already disproven the claim that "its at the QMM" is the incorrect), asking the relevant authority (the Queensland Heritage Council?) for the origin of the statement is the best way forward. Either they can provide the origin of the claim (which could be used to strengthen the Gona Barracks and other articles), or they can't (and they remove the incorrect information from their database, improving what they provide to the community). Failing that, the Royal Australian Navy's Naval Heritage Centre may be able to help. -- saberwyn 11:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Directions Techniques Des Constructions Naval listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Directions Techniques Des Constructions Naval. Since you had some involvement with the Directions Techniques Des Constructions Naval redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. . signed:Donan Raven (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMAS Westralia (F95), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollandia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

HMAS Anzac (G90)?
This discussion may be of intrest to you as you moved Anzac to its current location.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Australian light destroyer project/Östergötland-class destroyer 'See also' sections (deleted).
Hi Saberwyn. I was planning to add more light destroyer types to the above sections, including those closer in time period to the respective programs. I am curious however, as to why you believe the DDLs and the Östergötlands have no connection what so ever. Not only were they both light destroyer types, but their original operational concepts were similar; in the case of the Östergötland class to help counter infiltration by Soviet underwater units including combat swimmers as well as to supplement existing destroyer classes such as the Halland and Öland. A major difference was that the DDL was intended to be the eventual basis for a family of naval vessels, while the goal of the Swedish Navy with the Östergötland class was for a cheap General Purpose combatant that could be built in large numbers. Both aims were to be ultimately frustrated; the DDL program by a combination of mission creep and political maneuvering while hopes for further Östergötlands were dashed by the, ah, interesting procurement politics in Sweden during the late 1950s and in particular the 1960s. This was despite the fact that the Östergötland class were arguably too austere.

On reflection, perhaps I should have called the section/s 'Ships of comparable era and/or role'. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 12:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

 * First Fleet Re-enactment Voyage
 * added links pointing to Falmouth, Fuji, Lightship and Farm Cove

 * HMAS Derwent (DE 49)
 * added a link pointing to ASI

 * Planned Australian offshore combatant vessel
 * added a link pointing to Mine warfare

 * Søren Larsen (ship)
 * added a link pointing to Baltic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for HMAS Mildura
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Uranquinty page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=655936016 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F655936016%7CUranquinty%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Game of Thrones (season 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torrent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMAS Duchess (D154), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
  scuttling

Thank you, editor working from a rich slab and library, for quality contributions to articles on ships and their destinies, such as scuttling, for gnomish and assessment, for  which "summarises the entire article", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 26 April 2014 (UTC) A year ago, you were the 837th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Six years ago, you were recipient no. 837 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:43, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=663499638 your edit] to HMS Ark Royal (91) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * related to major battles of the Royal Navy. Ark Royal lay in two sections: {convert|20|m|ft} of the bow had separated from the rest of the ship. A large debris field, which

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

SS Portmar
I'd say there is enough material out there to write an article with. Ping me if you need assistance with The Times as a source. Mjroots (talk) 21:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Tried accessing the Times archive, but it told me I needed a subscription. -- saberwyn 02:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem - I get free access via my library card. Mjroots (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've expanded the article a bit. Mjroots (talk) 04:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much! -- saberwyn 13:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello saberwyn, thanks for the response. Regarding newspapers.com access, since you can't read the link I provided, I will add the links to my clippings page, where you should be able to see them (and link from them). It might take me a day or two to get around to it though. Gatoclass (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I clipped some stories, they are at this link. Be sure to sort them in chronological order. If you can't view them there, let me know and I'll try to figure something else out. Gatoclass (talk) 09:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Still no joy, Gatoclass. Still wants me to subscribe, and based on the url (specifically the "/mine" part), not entirely sure how readily it could be shared. -- saberwyn 13:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Try this. BTW, all 19 clippings are related to Portmar - you should be able to sort them chronologically. If you can't sort them chronologically, they should appear in reverse chronological order so you can follow the ship's history (what I found of it) from the bottom of the page up. Gatoclass (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Success! That's worked. I haven't used them all, but have extracted some very useful tidbits from them. Thanks for the help and the perseverence. -- saberwyn 03:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem :) Gatoclass (talk) 05:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for SS Portmar (1919)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Battle Honour Board
If you are interested I have photo of the HMAS GAWLER's battle honour board taken in 1983 at Williamstown Naval Dockyard. I am the maker of this board.

I could scan and email you this photo if you wish

Regards Robert Iamrob63 (talk) 10:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

 * I am curious and thank you for the offer, but if you send it to me directly, there is no easy way for me to add it to Wikipedia. I cannot easily upload photos on behalf of someone else. There are a number of legal hoops for me to jump through for me to upload a photo taken by someone else that hasn't been previously published (online or elsewhere). Instead, your best option is to join Wikimedia Commons (something you may already have thanks to unified logins across Wikimedia projects) and upload it there for use across all Wikipedia and related projects (an introduction and tutorial to Commons begins here). Alternately, sign up with an image-sharing service like Flickr and uploading the photo there with a compatible Creative Commons license (see here for a list of image licences compatible with Wikipedia projects). Please ask if you need any help with the signup or upload process. -- saberwyn 12:10, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=675073106 your edit] to HMAS Adelaide (FFG 01) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I design on 29 July 1977, launched on 21 June 1978 by Lady Ann Synnot (wife of Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Sir Anthony Synnot), and commissioned into the Royal Australian Navy on 15

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

 * HMAS Adelaide (FFG 01)
 * added a link pointing to RAST

 * HMAS Canberra (FFG 02)
 * added a link pointing to RAST

 * HMAS Sydney (FFG 03)
 * added a link pointing to RAST

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMAS Townsville (FCPB 205), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bathurst Island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

HMAS Tingira
Re the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships. Does Bastock really claim that Sobraon's maiden voyage started from Plymouth two months before she was launched in Aberdeen? See your edit here, citing Bastock for both. Davidships (talk) 01:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thats a source I do not have on hand. It will take me a week or two to verify. 20:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No hurry - I'm just puzzled as to how writer and publisher could have something to obviously nonsensical. Ah, the frailties of RS. The real launch date was 17 April 1866 as per reputable newspapers. Davidships (talk) 23:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * . Bastock states "She was launched in 1866 and named Sobraon..." in relation to the launch (and never specifies a more specific date), and "Her maiden voyage, under Captain Kyle, began on 9 September 1866, and she arrived in Australia on 4 February 1867." regarding her first voyage (both p. 63). The "November" from the launch comes from the Aberdeen Built Ships website. I have no explanation for why the wrong month was given for the maiden voyage. My apologies for never catching the disconnect. -- saberwyn 21:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks Saberwyn. If you think any cites to Bastock that I removed should be restored, please do. What does he say about the return voyage? Davidships (talk) 01:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * That will have to be another trip for another day. -- saberwyn 08:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steam Tug Wattle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Port Philip. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=694143100 your edit] to Royal Australian Navy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * shield-the-navys-newest-humanitarian-and-disaster-relief-vessel/ |accessdate=3 June 2012}}

Ocean Shield
Border Force's website now lists her among its ships: https://www.border.gov.au/australian-border-force-abf/protecting/maritime/cutter-abfc-ocean-shield and she seems to have vanished from the list on the RAN website. I can't find any news stories about it though... Nick-D (talk) 09:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your edit or "undo"
Which ref? I never added, mentioned or even read a ref there you deleted/corrected or whatever. I only changed the infobox because I tried to make it better, ok my english is not good and now I see that it really was not useful to cut one word here, and I removed the SEMT-Pielstick because it is not used at least in German speaking area, not even officially or so, there is not even the word "Pielstick" in the German Wikipedia is not to find if you read it quite fast, I was only at "MAN Diesel SE" of which "SEMT-Pielstick" is part, and not the whole MAN AG Page, I know other Wikipedias... but MAN is an very old German engine producer and if there is nothing in German Wikipedia it tells me something... you thought I got the 14,700 kW from this old 2013 dead link, I never even tried to click it and If I wrote that I use it (I dont think so) I really must have took again too much benzodiazepine medication or so...I took the Data from official MAN Diesel Site (German) and German Wikipedia combined if I remember right. The word "driving" I removed it, because I mean a ship is not flying of course with its engines, English Wikipedia I was on many pages for the very popular US models (Ford F-150 Series for example) on english Wiki, but usual is for me German, and I never read for example by an car, engine: 88 kW (100 PS or whatever) "moving" the car or so, its just clear its already in the word propulsion or engine which makes clear this is only for moving the boat, "driving", swimming I do not know what you can say, but wayne, now it is driving again ;)

But do not worry, this is I think Edit Nr. 4 in 2 months or so which is not ok, so I will continue to use both Wikis to win information but I will not make another "wrong" edit in English Wikipedia, in German everything is cool, I use almost only English refs there (for oil its just more actual, detailed, and I'm very interested in information about any fossil fuels, especially oil and natural gas, and I just checked Q-Max-Site, its just better in English, English often is better for details about navy propulsion for example and empty weight, MTOW, fuel capacity in kg and such things for military aircrafts, there is no discussion about this. I just wanted to tell you, that I never used this old odd ref^^ Greetings and nice weekend already from Berlin, Germany Kilon22 (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for again disturbing, but I now see and remember why I did not add an ref (I have one, even actual right now in English Wiki). Since I added a ref for the propulsion for the whole Durance-class repelenish oilers (old oilers...) and in the articlle you changed there is written in the infobox and I think in the first sentences that it is an Durance-Class oiler, so I thought the ref there is okay. It is french anyway and almost nobody in the US understands it and I thought it is okay in the Durance-class article, but if you like you can change it, and add "my" french ref and the propulsion is again in kW which is very accurate... only the few Saudi Arabian oilers got a higher displacement fully loaded since they had some changes which increased the it by a bit over 1,000 metric tons I think, for example the 2 Saudi oilers have 2 and not just one helicopter pad, I think cargo fuel was a bit increased too and also the fuel for the ship itself to increase range at higher speeds, maybe even they took stronger engines since if the displacement is over 19,000 metric tons and even with the old displacement the max speed was just 19 knots and the range given @ 15kn I guess the cruise speed is around 15 knots, these engines are good ones but maybe they installed stronger ones or so... 6 Ships and 4 different Navys using them, but ok only US Navy got an navy and air refueling system which is extreme good and everytime available when needed... thats why US debt is rising faster than some people can count :D Kilon22 (talk) 01:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=697722332 your edit] to HMAS Success (OR 304) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * tonnes of cargo: 8,707 tonnes of diesel fuel, 975 tonnes of aviation fuel, 250 tonnes of munitions including guided missiles and torpedoes_, 116 tonnes of water, 95 tonnes of components and naval

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=698908752 your edit] to HMAS Melbourne may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * * HMAS Melbourne (1912), a Town-class ight cruiser launched in 1912 and broken up for scrap in 1929
 * * HMAS Melbourne (FFG 05), an Adelaide-class uided missile frigate launched in 1989 and active as of 2016

The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox mobile suit
Template:Infobox mobile suit has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:45, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Daemon-prince.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Daemon-prince.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Battlestar Galactica vehicles
Template:Battlestar Galactica vehicles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TTN (talk) 15:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

"Inquisitor Eisenhorn" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Inquisitor Eisenhorn. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Shadow Fox for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shadow Fox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shadow Fox& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Isabelle 🔔 01:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Praxis effect for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Praxis effect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Praxis effect until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ― Susmuffin Talk 05:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

"Miscellaneous Space Marine Chapters" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Miscellaneous Space Marine Chapters. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 00:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

"Lamenters" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lamenters. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 00:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of T'au Empire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T'au Empire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/T'au Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KrootCarnivoreSquad.gif
Thanks for uploading File:KrootCarnivoreSquad.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zoidslogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zoidslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saberwyn


text:
User talk:Parayan~enwiki

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 09:56, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Parayan. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Parayan~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Parayan~enwiki


text:
User talk:Furious Stormrage

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 09:57, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Somalia
Hi!

 * 2008 timeline of the War in Somalia: Please do not forget to update ALL the numbers in the table, because you forgot civilian and insurgent casualties.-- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 12:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Talk:Press TV: I replied there -- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 12:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

your recent edits to the 2008 timeline of the War in Somalia had no sources at all. Due to the delicate situation regarding the article, and the numbers specifically, I removed your "May 9" addition and the numbers. Feel free to revert my removal if you find the sources.-- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 15:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * also, please see if some events were already mentioned, as some of your May 9 details seem to fit in to the May 8 events already included. Cheers, -- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 15:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * again, I must ask you to be more careful. The article http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24526442/ has May 8, 2008 as a date, see it: all events are for May 8. As I can see, the ambushes/civilian deaths were already mentioned...the only new thing to add is the 4 TFG dead in Mogadishu.-- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 15:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

You didn't see the two articles talk about the same incident? and. Sinka dher = Sinkadher. -- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 20:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

You're doing a great job at the timeline. Just avoid adding duplicate news like I said above. Are you a Somali? Do you own some relevant photos? Cheers, -- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 11:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah thanks. It gets problematic because different news sources describe the deaths in different ways. To answer your question. Yeah I am a Somali. Unfortuantly I came to the UK has a child so my knowledge of Somali is pretty much dead. English is my first language. I can only speak conversational Somali but I can't read it. My parents how ever frequent Somali websites for news and a lot of what goes out in Somali websites only 5% goes on the english websites. There is a wealth of photos of Ethiopian atrocities,Somali and Ethiopian soldiers beating and looting civilians and of rebel fighters killing them. Also there is more attacks there. A recent one I heard was Ethiopian soldiers accidentally mortaring a TFG base a month after some of their soldiers killed TFG soldiers. Furious Stormrage (talk) 11:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * of course there are more attacks, the 2008 timeline shows only a minimum reported by witnesses. But also I don't believe PRESS TV claims of 50 soldiers dead per day.-- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 21:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. Casualties like that would be impossible to hide.Furious Stormrage (talk) 21:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * please, don't make me add sources after your edits. And what July 7?-- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 16:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Press TV Sockpuppet
Greetings, Thought you'd like to know that there appears to be a sockpuppet on the Press TV page. Those series of "users" that keep trying to insert blatant POV complete with blog-derived sources, etc.? They're almost certainly one and the same person. I've opened up a sockpuppet case here. Your thoughts on the matter would definitely be most welcome and appreciated. Cheers, Causteau (talk) 22:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks (for example, "[A]re you people that stupid? Especially the last guy.") damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

My feelings on Somalia
Yes I am a Somali living in the UK. When it comes to Somalis and Somalia. I am always deppressed. My people have thoroughly,thoroughly destroyed every single shred of pride and dignity I had in being a Somali. Both in Somalia and the ones in Europe and America. This latest conflict is one of the stupidest wars in my opinion. It didn't have to end like this. All though I'm neutral in Wikipedia deep in my heart I am nothing but that. Sharif has disappointed me and many other Somalis. He made a peace agreement with a group that was barely non-existent. It gave him nothing but Western recognition. The worst thing was that he benefited the most from it yet he contributed the littlest to the resistance effort. He kept urging the resistance to stop fighting. They Insurgents ignored him and thanks to their blood,sweat and tears it gave him a better position to negotiate with. When he did gain power he picked up the book of the former president Yusuf. He now supports forgien troops despite being against it. He now doesn't really care much for Sharia and had to be forced into by Hizbul Islam and the Hawiye clan elders. He now is happy to visit the Ethiopians responsible for the deaths of 16,000 people. He's happy to visit African Union troops wounded but not the Somali civilians wounded/killed by the African Union troops. His positions don't matter to be much. I'm already jaded. It's the lies though. He goes around asking for foreign troops and then denies it.

Hizbul Islam/ARS also get on my nerve. They are to tribal and consequently have power hungry clan warlords. Indhaadde should have never been in it. Now he's tearing the group apart in order to gain more power for himself. The others should have treated him the way Al-Shabab treated him. No warlords who made people suffer should be in the group. They chased him out of Lower Shabelle and freed the people there.

Al-Shabab. I laugh in pain when ever I think of them. They could be Somalias best hope. They are the only group that are bonafide non-tribal. They see everyone in terms of Muslims and Somalis and not clans. They were willing to make ignore the tribal tendencies of the people living in Kismayo their most important city and made mayor a guy from Somaliland who is of a different tribe. Their only problem which is major is their tendacy to actually behave like Al-Qaeda. If they stop acting like terrorist and stop imitating them then they would have my support. I'm to pissed off to support anyone.

I don't think Somaliland should be independent to be honest. Most of the argument is based on lies about the unification or the dictator Siad Barre. That's not good enough for me. They base their country on the old British Somaliland not on clan so they are in effect forcing people to be part of an "independent nation". The very thing they secessionist were complaining about when they were in a union. To be honest it's been my experience that there is actually no real feeling for independance outside of the big cities in Somaliland. The kids in Diaspora support Somaliland only because they parents do and many Somalis in the rural areas don't care about secession. It's an idea ran by a few clans and intellectuals. It will probably die when a strong unified Southern Somalia that is seen has clean comes forward. Furious Stormrage (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Furious Stormrage


text:
Talk:David Stevenson (engineer)

Untitled
I changed the link from South Roma to South Rona. Although numerous sites on the web seem to claim that Stevenson established a light on South Roma in 1857, there is to my knowledge no Scottish location called South Roma.

I think the typo originated with wikipedia and has spread throughout the web via mirrors and people using the wikipedia info.

---Neil July 2005.

title: Talk:David Stevenson (engineer)


text:
User talk:BenStevenson

Christianity Explored
I saw that you restarted this article, which has been deleted once before. I happened on it looking through the Christianity stubs. The article itself does not appear to assert notability for the course ... I am unclear why it is more notable than so many other "intro to Christianity" courses? Is it related to the Alpha course? I did not want to tag the article or put it to an AfD without raising the concerns with you first. Merry Christmas, Pastordavid 19:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Christianity Explored
An editor has nominated Christianity Explored, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. DES (talk) 17:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of International Christian Medical and Dental Association
I have nominated International Christian Medical and Dental Association, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/International Christian Medical and Dental Association. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 17:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bethlehem Baptist Church (Minneapolis)

The article Bethlehem Baptist Church (Minneapolis) has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * not clear how this orphaned article meets notability guidelines, lacks any references to 3rd party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Bethlehem Baptist Church (Minneapolis)
I have nominated Bethlehem Baptist Church (Minneapolis), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bethlehem Baptist Church (Minneapolis). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 23:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Care Not Killing

A tag has been placed on Care Not Killing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# ▄ 00:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Evangelicals Now for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evangelicals Now is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Evangelicals Now until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WJ94 (talk) 09:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:BenStevenson


text:
User talk:Paulmcgrath

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 09:57, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paulmcgrath


text:
Talk:Netscape Communicator

Proposed reorganization
Please see Talk:Netscape/Archives/2012. – Smyth\talk 09:58, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Picture
Does anybody mind if I change the picture? We need a "classic" look and feel. In this case, Windows 98. Astroview120mm 19:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

List of defects?
Should the article refer to some of Netscape Navigator 4's many defects? E.g. the resize bug (layers vanish when window resized), the many situations where it crashed (even when trying to render legal HTML and CSS; and often killing the OS at the same time), its DHTML limitations, its CSS limitations.Philcha 01:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * References will be needed. -- Astroview 120  mm  02:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Netscape classic logo.png
The image Image:Netscape classic logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --03:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Netscape Communicator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www101.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease437.html
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www101.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease417.html
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease577.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 one external links on Netscape Communicator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www101.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease437.html
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www101.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease417.html
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease577.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110621060209/http://archive.netscape.com:80/ to http://archive.netscape.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Netscape Communicator


text:
Talk:Netscape 6

Proposed reorganization
Please see Talk:Netscape/Archives/2012. – Smyth\talk 09:58, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Netscape classic logo.png
The image Image:Netscape classic logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --03:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

User Interface Changes
No mention of the user interface changes that made Netscape 6 functionally unusable for a lot of users? I'm sure there's still a few people out there who refuse to use anything Mozilla-based thanks to those changes. I particularly remember that there was no option to manually input a URL, and the end user had very little control other than to simply click hyperlinks on whatever page they were viewing. The lack of readme files and documentation only compounded the problem.

No, I don't have source on it. I'm not sure how well-documented it was, considering that my experience with it was from some badly-managed college computer labs. --70.240.74.96 (talk) 22:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Netscape 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webtools.com/story/printableArticle?doc_id=TLS19981223S0001

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Netscape 6


text:
Talk:Camp Hyrule

I wrote up the new Awards section with the help of a Camp Hyrule expert. I also removed the Gannon-Banned section. It is completely unnecessary to have such a prominent article about Gannon-Banned, or even to mention it. It has almost nothing to do with Camp Hyrule as a whole, and is just vanity to get attention for the website it was linking to. In fact, the old section claimed the award was for the camper with the "worst grammar and spelling," when in fact the award was for the camper "Most Likely to Type in ALL CAPS!!" The real "Worst Speller" award was called the "Koopa Award." That just seems to be more proof that this section was added solely for vanity/advertising purposes. I don't see any need in this section being added for any reason to this article.

Also, I changed the category from "Legend of Zelda" to "Nintendo." Camp Hyrule may take its name from the "Legend of Zelda" series, but in reality the camp has very little to do with "The Legend of Zelda." Camp Hyrule covers the entire Nintendo universe, and is not limited in any respects to being just about "The Legend of Zelda."--BattleMario 09:58, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The section was put here because there were people who really wanted to see that section on Wikipedia and this was the most relevent article I could find (it used to be on The Legend of Zelda series, which was much worse). Not sure what'll happen now, but I guess nobody has noticed yet. Deco 20:00, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I understand that it may be important to some fans to have it up. However, I don't think the section needs to be put up in a mostly unrelated article for the sake of pleasing some fans :).--BattleMario 08:47, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

About the 2007 theme
Okay didn't NOA_ANDY state a million times his focus was to make CH more about the Zelda this year? Come on people get with the transcript!

User: Yoshi_Revoultion

 * Unless there was something that was not covered in the transcript sample posted on the bottom of the page, I do not think he explicitly stated the camp would revolve around the LoZ series. Given the camp is actually called "Camp Hyrule", a direct reference to the LoZ series, then technically LoZ has always been a theme. The entire table needs to be re-worked - I'll try to nail it down. :p -- ShadowJester07 ► Talk 02:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

 * As stated above Camp Hyrule is always somewhat Zelda themed (even the name comes from The Legend of Zelda). A few years back it was made specifically Zelda themed for Twilight Princess, but this year was nothing specially Zelda themed. Zomic_13 06:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

About the GANNON-BANNED Award
It was originally its own page. It was then moved to Zelda Series. Then to here. I'm adding it back in as a mention at least because it still is an award, but I'll leave out the info about the site and the creator. It seems the edit out was motivated by a bit of jealousy? Wonder what the creator would have to say about that if he found out who edited out. But don't worry, just leave in the small mention of the award, and whoever got the description wrong also needs to be hit on the head ;)
 * It is just such an insignificant part of the overall Camp Hyrule experience, it doesn't make sense to have a comprehensive section about it. If there's an article where it does make sense to explain it in more detail, then that's fine. I just don't see the need in the section finding its home in this article.--BattleMario 08:47, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

It was moved to Camp Hyrule from The Legend of Zelda page. There was an article just for it, but it was locked and moved to Zelda series, then to here. The re-direct on it takes it here. The Wiki mod said put it back in. - TSA

Is there any reason at all to re-direct "GANNON-BANNED" to Camp Hyrule? It seems to me that the two are hardly related...

 * It seems to me as if this whole "GANNON-BANNED" ordeal is nothing but a shameless self-promotion by someone who wants to be tied to the Zelda/Nintendo history. -DeeCee

 * It's actually a shameless self-promotion by someone who wants the Zelda/Nintendo history tied to them. Close enough, though.

Time
Does anyone know what time Camp Hyrule opens? I've been waiting all morning! -Somebody

It opens 9am Pacific Time, which is 12 noon Eastern Time. Toomai Glittershine 15:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Older maps
At Camp Hyrule 3000 You can find both more information and more old maps. It's hard to navigate as it is poorly managed and the forum isn't active and full of spam. here is a direct link to one of the albums containing maps. - Stan64

 * Thanks providing the link, but we already have an adequate number of photos for the article. --ShadowJester07 22:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

 * But you don't have maps of '97 and '98 that can be found on that site here: http://groups.msn.com/CampHyrule3000/shynkzmapemporium.msnw Stan64 12:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

 * Partially because we don't want to clutter the past camp's section with a lot of images. --ShadowJester07 20:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Summary of past camps

 * For one thing, Why is the Summary of past camps time-line in caterogized in a descending fashion; versus various other tables which feature content that is caterogized in acceding order. In other words, the tables content should be reordered starting with 1995, as opposed to 2006.

 * Second, there seems to be heated debate regarding what the camp's true themes are. While the camp is definetally featuring Super Mario Galaxy, it is also advocating Star Fox Armada, Mario Basketball 3 on 3, and the DS Lite. I feel we can resolve these disputes by changing the table, so a section reads "Featured Content"; Thus allowing us to add the particular titles that were advertised. --ShadowJester07 01:44, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

 * I disagree. I was the one who added the "theme" column in the very first place (along with the rest of the table), and I must say that every camp has ONE SINGLE theme that dominates everything else. That's what the column is for. This year, it's Super Mario Galaxy. Sure, the Wii, Phantom Hourglass, Mystery Dungeon, etc. are also advertised, but the entire CAMPGROUND was inspired by SMG alone. Similarly, last year, the camp was inspired by Twilight Princess. And so forth. This should not be a matter of dispute at all. Wikipedian06 20:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Allrighty then; If your good with tables, how about fixing up the order ;) I have the Wikipedia Add-on for Firefox, but filling in the tables is rather tedious. :p --ShadowJester07 20:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Is there a Wikipedia guideline suggesting that information must be organised in chronologically ascending order? Wikipedian06 20:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm not exactly sure, but all the sports tables I have encountered are in accending order by year. (See Chicago Bears seasons and Green Bay Packers statistics) --ShadowJester07 21:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Seriously, I don't see anything Super Mario Galaxy related in Camp Hyrule...

 * All Camp Hyrule themes are centered around Nintendo Games. As you may or may not know, SMG is set in Space. The Camp's outer space setting is a reference to SMG. Similar to how last year's "Darker" Setting was a reference to LOZ:TP. --ShadowJester07 00:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Well, if you take a look at the Super Mario Galaxy vids from E3, you'll see planetoids that look just like the ones on the CH maps. Wikipedian06 00:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Canceled
NOA_ANDY: Starting August 13, you'll be able to visit www.CampHyrule.com for a chance to win a life-size Link statue.
 * NOA_ANDY: That means that there will not be any community-based message boards or chat.
 * NOA_ANDY: But, we will still have a new Camp Hyrule map, and it will contain Flash games, a special place for Stumpy (the Camp Hyrule mascot), and a Camp Hyrule Message Board where campers can post their memories about Camp Hyrule from over the years.
 * NOA_ANDY: This Message Board won't be a community message board, but a place where individual messages can be posted.
 * NOA_ANDY: There is no need to pre-register for Camp Hyrule.
 * NOA_ANDY: Campers won't be divided into cabins as part of the sweepstakes, though.
 * NOA_ANDY: All that will be required to enter the sweepstakes is a My Nintendo membership.

I replaced the lines about Camp Hyrule 2007 being canceled, since it's not entirely true. The map and flash games will still go live, so there will be a theme to mention in the Wiki.

 * Yes. Camp Hyrule isn't exactly canceled - more like very downgraded (although to some there probably isn't much difference). As stated above there will still be a map and the flash games, as well as a single board for people to post their Camp Hyrule memories of years past. Some of the traditional Camp Hyrule message board games/contests will also still be held - just on the Nsider forums. And of course, this year's prize is one of the biggest yet (a life-size statue of Link!). For more information, you can read this chat transcript posted by NOA_Andy on the Nsider Forums. http://forums.nintendo.com/nintendo/board/message?board.id=np_po&message.id=21795518 - Zomic_13 (Sonic_13 on Nsider)

 * Since ShadowJester07 is the one reverting my edits, I will explain to you why I am making them. Signups are not "canceled", since that implies that there is no event this year.  "No signups required" is more accurate, since you are able to access the map with a My Nintendo account.  The theme is "To be determined", not "non applicable", since Andy has already said there will be an interactive map.

 * For right now, the table should stay as is (with the "no sign ups required" and "tbd"). There will be a new map, so a theme is extremely likely. Also, the Camp is not entirely canceled as I previously said, so it shouldn't say canceled. Zomic_13 04:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

 * This is the exact reason why the NSider article was deleted. Bozos kept coming onto Wikipedia, and posting incorrect information - it's hard to tell whats fact and fiction. To make matters worse, there was no way to properly verify the information since Andy hardly speaks in serious tone (see the ch webpage); At least the transcript was straightforward. I apologize for the hastily reverts. For future reference, make sure no one goes astray from what Andy's message, unless they address it here. -- ShadowJester07 ► Talk 05:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:Camp Hyrule


text: Category:Bali

title: Category:Bali


text:
A Pretty Mess by This One Band

A Pretty Mess by This One Band is an EP by American indie rock band Grandaddy, released in April 1996 through record label Will. It includes several songs taken from the band's earlier cassette-only release Complex Party Come Along Theories.

Release
A Pretty Mess by This One Band was released in April 1996 by record label Will.

The tracks from the EP were reissued in 2002 on the album The Broken Down Comforter Collection.

Reception
AllMusic writer Dean Carlson gave it a three-star review, describing it as "a decent litmus test for the group's own potential. Definitely not as pretty as the title might suggest, but still one of the better – although flawed – messes from America's indie underground", comparing it to Pavement, Pixies and Yo La Tengo. Guitarist Jim Fairchild put the similarities to Pavement down to their recording budget, stating "We had very meager means when we recorded our first album for Will Records, so it's naturally going to sound more lackadaisical and sloppy than our current records."

Track listing
All tracks written by Jason Lytle.

 * 1) "Away Birdies with Special Sounds"
 * 2) "Taster"
 * 3) "Peeano"
 * 4) "Kim You Bore Me to Death"
 * 5) "Pre-Merced"
 * 6) "Gentle Spike Resort"
 * 7) "Egg Hit and Jack Too"

title: A Pretty Mess by This One Band


text:
Hundred Gates

Hundred Gates may refer to:
 * Hecatompylos, a capital of the Parthian Empire
 * Hundred-Gated Thebes, a city of ancient Egypt
 * Meah Shearim, a neighbourhood of Jerusalem, Israel

title: Hundred Gates


text:
Matt Darey

Matthew Jonathan Darey (born 29 November 1968) is an English trance music producer and performer. Darey has sold over two million albums and singles with numerous top 10 and top 20 chart hits.

Music career
Darey was born in Leicester, England. Some of his earliest solo work was under the name Lost Tribe, releasing the EP The Distant Voices in 1997. The single "Gamemaster" reached number 24 on the UK Singles Chart in 1999.

In addition to production and remixing work for other artists, Darey began releasing music under his own name in 2004. In 2005 he debuted a new show on Digitally Imported called Nocturnal, which became a weekly show the following year. His 2007 single "Beautiful Day" reached the top 25 on Billboard's Hot Dance Music Club Play and hitting the Top 20 on the Hot Dance Airplay chart in the United States. Darey has made several appearances in the annual worldwide top 100 DJs poll, including peaking at #34 in 2008.

Darey owns a record label, Darey Products, featuring releases from himself and upcoming artists. In 2015 he changed his stage name to Matt Nouveau to signal a change in musical direction. As of 2021 Darey hosts a monthly Internet radio show on Digitally Imported's European Trance station.

Albums and EPs

 * Lost Tribe – The Distant Voices EP (1997 – Hooj Choons)
 * Voice of an Angel EP (2004, Incentive Records)
 * Point Zero EP (2005, Water Music Records)
 * Decade (2004; also released a 200-copy limited-edition version)
 * Urban Astronauts – EP1 (31 March 2008; Koch Records) The debut EP from Darey's side project Urban
 * Matt Darey pres. Urban Astronauts feat. Kate Louise Smith – See The Sun (Remixes) (9 November 2009; Nocturnal Global)
 * Blossom & Decay (3 August 2012)

Singles

 * Li Kwan – "Point Zero" (1994) No. 51 UK (with "I Need A Man")
 * Space Baby – "Free Your Mind" (1995) No. 55 UK
 * Lost Tribe – "Gamemaster" (1999 – Hooj Choons) No. 24 UK
 * "Liberation" (1999) No. 19 UK
 * M3 – "Bailamos" (1999) No. 40 UK
 * Melt featuring Little Ms Marcie – "Hard House Music" (2000) No. 59 UK
 * Sunburst – "Eyeball (Eyeball Paul's Theme)" (2000) No. 48 UK
 * Matt Darey presents DSP – "From Russia with Love" (2000 – Liquid Asset) No. 40 UK
 * MDM – "Mash It Up" No. 66 UK
 * "Liberation (Fly Like An Angel)" (2001)
 * "Beautiful" (2002, with Marcella Woods) No. 10 UK
 * "U Shine On" / "Moody" (2002, with Marcella Woods – Incentive Records) No. 34 UK
 * Lost Tribe – "Gamemaster" (2003 remake of the 1999 single – Liquid Asset) No. 61 UK
 * Lost Tribe – "Possessed" (2004 – Darey Products)
 * "Electro Buzz" (2003 – Incentive Records)
 * "Voice of An Angel" (2003 – Incentive Records)
 * "Nocturnal Delight" (2004 – Incentive Records)
 * "Liberation 2005" (2005; 2 CDs with 13 remixes of the song – Darey Products)
 * "Eternity" (2005 – Darey Products)
 * "Always" (2006, featuring Tiff Lacey – Darey Products)
 * "Beautiful Day" (2007, featuring Antoine and Marcia Juell)
 * "Sum of All Fears" (2007, featuring Tiff Lacey – Darey Products)
 * "Animal" (2008, with Urban Astronauts)
 * "Hold Your Breath" featuring Leah – Armada Music (2012)
 * "I Will Follow You" with Stan Kolev featuring Aelyn – Armada Music (2012)

Selected remixes

 * Agnelli & Nelson – "El Niño"
 * ATB – "9pm"
 * Binary Finary – "1998" / "1999"
 * Blockster – "Grooveline"
 * Delerium – "Heaven's Earth"
 * Gabrielle – "Rise"
 * Kim Wilde – "Breaking Away"
 * Kim Wilde – "Heaven"
 * Kim Wilde – "Shame"
 * Headstrong featuring Tiff Lacey – "Close Your Eyes"
 * Johnna – "Do What You Feel"
 * Magners – "Shlurgen"
 * Moloko – "The Time is Now"
 * Planet Perfecto Feat. Grace – "Not Over Yet"
 * Technique - "Sun is Shining"
 * The Space Brothers – "Legacy"
 * Tin Tin Out – "Sometimes"
 * Tin Tin Out – "Strings for Yasmin"
 * Westbam – "Wizards of the Sonic"

Selected album appearances

 * Ibiza Euphoria (1999)
 * Pure Euphoria
 * The Very Best of Euphoria (2002, mixed by Darey)
 * Upfront Trance (2005, Water Music Records)
 * Ultimate Trance (Mixed by Darey) (2005)
 * Nocturnal album (Mixed by Darey) (September 2007)
 * Nocturnal 2010 (Mixed by Darey) (May 2010)

Video games

 * NGEN Racing (soundtrack)

title: Matt Darey


text:
User talk:Clarenceasa

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

title: User talk:Clarenceasa