text:
User talk:Dbenbenn/archive6

Image:Frost Aerial.jpg
Could you indicate at Image:Frost Aerial.jpg where you got that photo? You said above that such photos come from theTerraserver, but as far as I can tell the Terraserver photos are always black and white. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 15:07, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * If you were not aware, the United States Geological Survey agency takes photographs in both color and black and white. Based upon my own experience, most of the older images or images taken in the mid-western United States are black and white, but there are exceptions.  Your results will vary from place to place.  --GRider\talk 22:10, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: copy of a post from User talk:Mathwiz2020: Go to Microsoft Terraserver and, on the left, type in "9201 Scott Drive, Rockville, Maryland", the address of Robert Frost Middle School, and click "Go".  It will take you to a page listing three aerials: "Urban Areas 4/7/2002", "Aerial Photo 4/20/1988", and "Topo Map 7/1/1981".  The topo map is just a topographical map; the 1988 aerial is black-and-white (the one you are referring to); and the 2002 aerial is both color and higher resolution (the one that I used in the Robert Frost Middle School article).  Since the 2002 photo is labelled "urban areas", if you want an aerial of a rural or suburban area (although I consider Frost to be suburban, it is close enough to Washington, DC to be considered urban), you will only have access to the topo and the black-and-white aerial, not the color aerial.   — mathwiz2020talk  16:57, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Huygens.jpg
What is source of Huygens image?

Superborsuk 14:02, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * How should I know? We don't even know who originally uploaded it.  dbenbenn | talk 12:05, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Star Trek
Hey David! How's it going? I was hoping if you can help me make Star Trek a featured article. There seems to be so much content missing despite having a lot of content already. I believe it needs a complete rewrite and work over as well a lot of reorganization. As it stands, it is an interesting read, but there is much lacking here. Information about cast, production, or wikilinks to them... relationships of Star Trek in culture, relationship of Star Trek with NASA... stuff like that. Please help me by contributing your thoughts to Talk:Star Trek. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Images
Heh, sorry about that. I just figured that out recently, so i'll remember next time. Thunderbrand 20:53, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Why did you remove the ifd header on Image:MeStephenJW.jpg? RickK 21:16, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * I processed its nomination, along with all the others from April 27. It wasn't deleted since it isn't an orphan.  I left a note at Votes for deletion/Stephen Weierman (as you saw) asking for it to be renominated once the article that uses it gets deleted.  I should have copied the original IFD nomination to Image talk:MeStephenJW.jpg, as I usually do.  Sorry about the confusion.

 * About the backlog at WP:IFD: when I left for vacation, I left a request at Wikipedia talk:Images and media for deletion. It appears no one processed IFD while I was gone.  I'm back now, but any help would still be appreciated.  dbenbenn | talk 21:26, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I generally try to avoid doing actual deletions from the VfD and IfD pages, I have too many people attacking me as a deletionist, and I don't want to give them any more ammunition. RickK 21:38, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Multilicense
Hi Ed. Would you be willing to release Image:2004 US elections map.png as cc-by-sa-2.0? Since the GFDL is incompatible with the Creative Commons licenses, Image:2004 election maps.PNG is technically a copyright violation at the moment. (One could argue that the other images used are implicitly GFDL, having been uploaded here by their creators, but that's slightly iffy.) Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 05:28, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * You need to ask Wapcaplet who created the original .svg file. ed g2s  •  talk  10:08, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * If Wapcaplet's image is share-alike then mine is automatically. It's free. Do what you want. ed g2s  •  talk  22:08, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, as I understand it, when you modify an image that is multilicensed, you can take it under any of the licenses individually; you don't have to release your modified work under all the licenses. Copyright is such a pain.  I went ahead and tagged Image:2004 US elections map.png as cc-by-2.0.  That actually isn't share-alike, but it's the license I needed.  Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 22:57, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Hi Wapcaplet. I notice you multilicense all your PNG and JPG images with all the cc-by licenses. Would you be willing to license Image:Map of USA with state names.svg as cc-by-2.0 or any other such cc license? I ask because for now, is technically a copyright violation, since it combines a GFDL image (Image:2004 US elections map.png, which was produced from your SVG file) with cc-by-2.0 images. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 16:01, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

 * Oh, the troubles one must endure simply to declare "yes, I want this to be free." :-) But I suppose I did sort of exclude SVG from the blanket license given on my user page. I have added the multi-license to the SVG file in question, and will revise my user page. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! -- Wapcaplet 17:14, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Higher resolution iceberg
Hi Kils. The high-resolution version of your iceberg photo from has been uploaded to Image:Iceberg14.jpg. Are you willing to license this version under the GFDL? Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 02:56, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

 * hallo David. thank you for the notice, no, i want to keep the copyright for the high res images. I am early retired and on disability and sometimes I can sell the high resolution images, and I urgently need the royalties - good luck to you - Uwe Kils 22:02, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

 * Okay; I deleted the high-resolution version from Image:Iceberg14.jpg. I also uploaded a higher-quality thumbnail of the image, that is still only 420 pixels wide.  Is that okay with you?  (Perhaps I should have asked first, but I thought it would be better if you see what I'm talking about.  I'll delete the version I uploaded if you want.)  dbenbenn | talk 22:26, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

 * hallo David and thank you. no, please reset it to the old resolution Uwe Kils 22:40, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * "old resolution"? The resolution was the same ... anyway, it's gone.  dbenbenn | talk 22:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Hiya!
Hiya, Dbenbenn! Thanks very much, and that's cool about not noticing, I got a microwave as it was. ;-) That request for adminship of mine was a real roller-coaster ride—if you want to see the weird side of it, take a peek at this request for arbitration, that just went live.--Bishonen | talk 23:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright
Unfortunately, "lets keep it" means absolutely nothing in copyright, court, or law in general. Find us a good, well sourced and free image and then I am willing to keep it. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 02:29, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Of course, I wrote more than "let's keep it". Anyway, see Category:Presumed GFDL images, which points out that
 * "assuming the image is redistributable under GFDL just because the original uploader didn't say otherwise is similar to assuming an image is GFDL just because the original uploader says so."
 * You have to trust people eventually, and what I meant by my comment at WP:PUI is that even if the uploader is AWOL, he can probably be trusted.

 * Is there anything more I have to do to formally dispute or object to the image's deletion? I hope you won't simply ignore my objection ...

 * By the way, if the image is replaced by a good, well sourced and free image (especially if it's higher resolution), then I'll have no objection to deleting Image:Airflow.jpg. dbenbenn | talk 03:13, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
 * There is nothing there to lead me to believe that he took the picture. The most glaring thing is that the photo date is extimated. So, no, this is not GFDL-presumed. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 12:34, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * You mean "estimated", right? Not knowing when you took a photo isn't very surprising.  And the uploader could probably have narrowed it down closer if he had bothered.  So again, I believe the uploader took the photo, and I intend to dispute its deletion.  dbenbenn | talk 16:36, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to indicate either way whether or not the uploader took the picture. In addition, pictures of cars are fairly easy to come by. Thus, I see no reason to keep it. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 17:21, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Normal cover?
Can I take a pic of a NORMAL cover AC switch and get you to put THAT on the page Light switch? Thanx 68.39.174.150 04:49, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

 * Hi! In order to upload photographs, you have to create an account.  It's free and only takes a few seconds.  Then you can upload whatever photo you want and edit light switch to use it.  Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 05:41, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

NowCommons
Hi Gren. You might find that NowCommons makes life a little easier. Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 03:29, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

 * Thanks for showing me the now commons template, that should come in handy :) gren 05:32, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

movielens
Heya, I noticed you editing a movie list, have you seen this? Not flawless, but kind of cool both for keeping track of what you've seen and what to watch next. disclaimer: I'm not affiliated with movielens apart from being a user; this message, though unsolicted, was only sent to one editor. --W(t) 06:28, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the link! That site is down right now, but I'll be sure to check it out.  dbenbenn | talk 06:38, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Are you sure? Working fine here, I was just using it a minute ago (which is why I thought of it when I saw your edits), and it's working now too. --W(t) 06:47, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
 * That's so strange. It works fine from work, where the internet is largely broken, but I can never load it from home.  dbenbenn | talk 17:02, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Vail Pass
Hi Matthew. When processing your deletion request for Image:DSCN2091 vailpassrestarea e 600.jpg, I noticed it was different from Commons:Image:DSCN2091 vailpassrestarea e 600.jpg. I presume the version I just deleted here was the original? Anyway, I uploaded it at the Commons, and then reverted. dbenbenn | talk 23:46, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

 * The version I uploaded to the Commons is the one to be used. I adjusted the brightness/contrast to my liking when I uploaded the Commons image. The one currently that was in Wikipedia should be deleted entirely. I'm curious why you overrode the one in the Commons? -- Decumanus 00:12, 2005 May 31 (UTC)

 * Note that the brighter one is still the current version, so it's the one that appears at Vail Pass. I uploaded the non-brightened version because I think it's good to keep the original image whenever possible.  What if someone else wants to see how you adjusted the image, or wants to make their own changes?  dbenbenn | talk 00:17, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Los amantes del círculo polar
Hi. You recently moved the page Los amantes del círculo polar to Los Amantes del Círculo Polar. This is incorrect nomenclature as titles in Spanish are not capitalised on any letter other than the first (note that the IMDB, which may be your source, gets this wrong too). I thought as you were an administrator I would ask you first to move it back to Los amantes del círculo polar rather than listing it on Requested moves. --Ngb 16:42, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I've moved it back.  Note that you could have undone the move yourself; being an administrator wasn't necessary.  dbenbenn | talk 19:12, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks! I thought I couldn't move a page to somewhere where another page existed already, even if it was only a redirect, but obviously I was wrong about that. :) --Ngb 21:46, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Quotes
Hello, I like the two quotes from NPR on your userpage. Do you have more complete references for them, or at least who said them? Thanks. Osmodiar 09:26, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I heard them on the radio, and wrote them down as fast as I could. The second quote is apparently due to Bruce Schneier.  The first was on NPR on March 4, 2005 on Morning Edition, possibly in the Letters section.  (No sound card on my computer, so I can't listen to those archives.  Please let me know if you find the quote!)  dbenbenn | talk 19:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:EconNaziPropaganda.png
I'm rather perplexed at your taking this off of IFD as "not an orphan". The whole point is that it is unencyclopedic because the text has been deliberately garbled, not that it is an orphan. The only two editors to speak on this were myself, being the nominator, and the uploader, who agreed with its deletion. Perhaps you simply misread the disussion. Thanks.--Pharos 01:44, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Since images can't be undeleted, I'm quite cautious about deleting them. I agree that the image is nearly worthless.  But the people who edit Nazism should be making that decision, not me.  I suggest that you remove it from the article, and relist it on WP:IFD.  That way editors watching Nazism will notice the image's removal, and will have a week to express any objection.  dbenbenn | talk 01:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Chess template Translate aid
Hello I am working at first on es.wikipedia.org,

Can you help me with information about how to translate the chess board template?

I affraid the little images with this is based are not in wikimedia:commons, either in en.wikipedia, then the traslation to other languages are hard. Is this correct?

Can other wikipedias use templates from other languages?

Thanks

A copy of these questions are on the chess board template discussion.

--Gengiskanhg 22:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * I've replied at Template talk:Chess position. dbenbenn | talk 23:23, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * I've rereplied at Template talk:Chess position. Please answer my question so I can begin to work, thanks. --GengisKanhg (my talk) 21:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Template:PD-Germany
You seem to have permanently protected this template. You might note that it has been marked for deletion. --Henrygb 10:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * No, Quadell protected it. See the log.  dbenbenn | talk 14:22, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

IfD
Hi Dmcdevit. Great work listing unverified orphans on IFD! But when you do that, you need to add ifd to the image description page, and drop a note at the uploader's talk page asking for information. For example, I decided not to deleteImage:AXthree001.JPG (which you listed on June 6), since it looks like a user photo. I instead asked the uploader, User:Alezane, for more information. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 19:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * Oh, wow, I'm not usually that absent-minded! I guess it was because of the mass-listings, I'd neved do that on VfD. Well, anyway, sorry, I'll fix any that are left, and be more careful in the future. Thanks. --Dmcdevit 19:56, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hkicon.gif
If the image is still orphaned, then may I ask why was the image kept. The orphan issue was why I listed the image on IFD in the first place. Also, I hope the creator of the image still does not think I am running a conspiracy here. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, there were a few objections to deleting. Since images can't be undeleted, the instructions in the second paragraph at WP:IFD are very conservative.

 * User:Mcy jerry's contribution to that discussion was pretty hilarious! By the way, I really appreciate the work you've been doing tidying up images.  Thanks!  dbenbenn | talk 06:26, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Do you think it will be ok to place the image at IFD again, since it has not been used since it has been removed from the templates? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:09, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Yep. dbenbenn | talk 03:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I placed it back there, the creator of the image removed my notice from his talk page. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 15:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

chess template
The contrast doesn't seem too good for the boards. Why not create a separate template instead, that way we can choose either. -- Natalinasmpf 01:30, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "contrast"? Do you mean the green color?  By the way, I just uploaded darker versions of the white pieces, since they faded out a bit when scaled down.  Perhaps that was what you meant?  dbenbenn | talk 02:20, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Last night, all of the colored squares in the Wikipedia chess tournament boards became white for me, making it impossible to distinguish light-color squares from dark squares. I much prefer the previous colors. H Padleckas 14:41, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, the intention of course wasn't to make all the squares the same color. In my browser it looks the same as it did two days ago.  Anyway, I've modified the template slightly.  Does the board at Template talk:Chess position t look right for you, with green and white squares?  Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 18:02, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * I just checked my chess game. Now I see green and "cream"-colored squares.  I think that's much better.  Thank you for the fix.  H Padleckas 18:11, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * Oops! I just checked the template in the above link you gave.  The squares still look mostly white.  I will check again.  H Padleckas 18:15, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * The template was reverted, since it didn't work. The version at Template talk:Chess position t is for testing, to get the kinks worked out.  What browser are you using?  "Mostly white": do some of the squares look green?  Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 18:54, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please look at for discuss this. :-) --GengisKanhg (my talk) 18:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I think we can create a powerful template for universal use at wikimedia with the next characteristics:
 * 1) Background colors (to be choosed by invocation)
 * 2) Piece styles (to be choosed by invocation)
 * 3) Algebraic notacion at the board edges with some possibilities like: 1) none, 2) At Up and right, 3) At all edges.
 * 4) Possibility to add "transparent backgrounded-fixed oriented arrows" on the squares for give "arrows" capability to the chess diagrams. (Can we put and images on another one on templates, so they be added in the transparency case?)

Technical Questions:
 * 1) Should LaTeX support will be more powerfull than this possibilities suggested???
 * 2) Can we make a general template and invocate it from another template which define some (but not all) of its parameters???

(Copied from english template talk) --GengisKanhg (my talk) 19:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

More about icebergs
Hi again, Uwe! You tagged Image:Iceberg.jpg as being fair use. Is the bottom berg someone else's? Do you remember where it came from? Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 00:02, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * hallo David - no, they are both mine - will change it to gfdl - they are from Antarctica - best greetings Uwe Kils 00:10, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

krill 300 frames per sec

 * the framerate 300 per sec was the recording speed Uwe Kils [[Image:Uwekilsmini.jpg]] 03:15, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

VfD Closing process
Good afternoon. There's recently been some discussion about ways to simplify the VfD closing process. I know I have some pride-of-authorship issues and may not be as perfectly impartial as I'd like. Would you mind taking a few minutes to review the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Deletion process and share your thoughts? Thanks. Rossami (talk) 20:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Move an image to Commons
Greetings Dbenbenn. I was wondering if the picture Image:The Little Prince.jpg from The Little Prince could be moved to Commons.. what do you think? And, would you know, how to do that? (I am a very new user :)

The image was scanned by fr:User:MagicTom for Le Petit Prince and then copied by you into the English version; then there are more local copies in other languages, as well. And I just started one in Russian. Thanks in advance for any help! - ru:User:Bepa -  Introvert 09:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) (Talk)
 * No, the Commons doesn't accept "fair use" material. You can read more at Commons:Commons:Licensing. dbenbenn | talk 13:55, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Aye, I see... thanks for help - Introvert 20:17, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gdansk WP:RM
I have move the page back to Gdansk. I think you should wait for a consensus as specified by WP:RM before moving the page. The Gdańsk spelling is not used in English. Please fix the double redirect on Danzig which you have changed and I can not undo because it is protected. Philip Baird Shearer 28 June 2005 15:22 (UTC)
 * Done. I only moved the page because it was in Category:Articles lacking diacritics.  I didn't know it was listed at WP:RM.  dbenbenn | talk 28 June 2005 15:46 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration against User:JarlaxleArtemis
This message is to inform you that a Request for Arbitration has been initiated against the user JarlaxleArtemis. Since you have previously been the target of this user's alleged attacks, you are invited to join yourself to the proceedings and/or present evidence at Requests_for_arbitration/JarlaxleArtemis_2/Evidence. —Psychonaut 29 June 2005 15:37 (UTC)

Election votes
Hello Dbenbenn, thank you for your voting.

If I understand correctly, you voted from Commons wiki and here English Wikipedia. As you know, every voter have only one vote by person. You can vote from anywhere you have over 400 edits, but you have to choose one project from which you would vote.

I stroke the older vote(s) and left the latest one from here. If you would like to change your vote again, please vote from the wiki you have voted last time.

Your reply on my meta talk page will be appreciated.

Thank you!

Aphaea *  30 June 2005 10:14 (UTC) P.S. your pic(s) is not only impressive but also helpful for  my task. Thank you for lovely winter view!

Getting an image deleted
Hi Ben, and welcome to Wikipedia! To get an image deleted, after adding ifd, you have to actually list the image at Images and media for deletion. Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 1 July 2005 19:52 (UTC)

 * Hi -- You left a message on my user talk page about how to delete images. Was there a particular image you thought I should delete?--Bcrowell 1 July 2005 20:14 (UTC)

 * At Image:1cx.jpg you wrote "I uploaded this with the wrong name, and now am not sure how to delete it." and tagged it ifd. dbenbenn | talk 1 July 2005 20:17 (UTC)

 * Ah, thanks! Done. --Bcrowell 1 July 2005 23:23 (UTC)

June 23 IFD
Hello. I answered some of your comments at the page. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 3 July 2005 22:29 (UTC)

Dotty maps
Dotty maps by CSS are done with Template:GBthumb. Which I cribbed off Template:Ie citytown infobox. -- RHaworth 2005 July 6 07:03 (UTC)

shallot
Hi Joy. User:Shallot is still an admin. Do you have any objection to de-sysopping that user account? dbenbenn | talk 5 July 2005 16:03 (UTC)

 * I really don't care, as long as you don't give the account away to someone else or desysop Joy :) --Joy [shallot]   6 July 2005 10:29 (UTC)

Bled lake
I've answered your question on my talk page ~ Booyabazooka 7 July 2005 01:21 (UTC)

Wikisource logo
I put a new message on your talk on meta. I hope you will do anything necessary to improve the situation. Thanks. -- Aphaea *  7 July 2005 03:01 (UTC)

Image:Fiery knight.JPG
I'm sorry, I can't find the reason you removed the Image:Fiery knight.JPG image from IFD. Is there reason? The picture was taken in 1944 Burma with swastikas everywhere. It is titled "Fiery Knight." The other picture on his user page was also listed as 1944 Burma with more swastikas under the title, "Swastika Knights." I don't think the references are subtle. Yes, it is his user page, but this is not his private website. Wikipedia and a public shared resource that must submit to standards of decorum. I am not aware of User:Curtsurly publicly defending the pictures in any way. I may be mistaken.--Muchosucko 7 July 2005 15:09 (UTC)

 * I don't see any swastikas at Image:Fiery knight.JPG. I didn't delete the picture because there was an objection; see Image talk:Fiery knight.JPG.  If you think the image is a copyright violation, feel free to list it at WP:PUI.  dbenbenn | talk 7 July 2005 15:17 (UTC)
 * Image:Fiery knight.JPG
 * There are five swastikas down the right side. Look closer. It is not a copyright violation. It breaches polite sensibilities.--Muchosucko 7 July 2005 16:21 (UTC)

Re: Image:"Fiery Knight" subject for Deletion
Hello,

Thank you for your vote of confidence regarding the image, "Fiery Knight", which is simply an image of my Father that I doctored deliberately to reflect my interest in the Swastika in all its guises. I appreciate your swift action most significantly. Again, much thanks for helping me save this personal image from deletion.

Everett

blood_victory 9 July 2005 03:48 (UTC)

Commons protection
Yes, I guess I could've, but I was pressed for time at that particular moment. I didn't have the time to go through the entire upload process. Besides, wouldn't it need to be deleted afterwards anyway? Is still a lot of work. Thanks for your help and the tip anyway. - Mgm|(talk) 17:37, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

IFD again
Please be more careful when listing images at WP:IFD. For example, on July 6 you listed Image:Peaches and Bongo1.jpg, saying that it has no source. It has a source clearly indicated. Also, you failed to tag the actual image with ifd, and you did not notify the author. dbenbenn | talk 15:41, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Whoops! I guess I didn't look to closely beyond seeing no copyright tag (which was added later). But there is no excuse for that and not tagging and all. I'll make sure it doesn't happen again. Incidentally, I wonder if I could ask you a question about image deletion. If I were to list that image again, its only crime being that it is an orphan, could it be deleted on those grounds only? I can't remember seeing many like that listed. --Dmcdevit·t 20:08, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

 * Yes, feel free. I suppose it is also UE.  dbenbenn | talk 20:46, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Fair use
I don't know if Image:NZNF with banner small.jpg is related to the above. I created it as a smaller version of another photo because the Fair Use was being challenged. One of the fair use criteria is that the image be reproduced at a lower resolution. Is there a specific reason that you don't think the fair use challenge was sincere or that we can reproduce the image at full resolution and still claim fair use? The discussion spread across many different talk pages, so it'd take me a little while to find all the previous discussions on this image, but I'd be happy to do so if you'd like to review them. Thanks, -Willmcw 20:20, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

 * Sorry, I didn't realize it had been discussed. Personally I think the large version is sufficiently small (only 2 inches wide on a 300dpi printer!) that it's okay.  If you disagree, feel free to change the two pages that use the image back.  dbenbenn | talk 20:46, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dbenbenn/archive6


text:
User talk:Juicey e

Just testing. --Juice 03:04, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Juicey e


text:
File:Ilebizard.png

Location of Île-Bizard within Montreal

title: File:Ilebizard.png


text:
User talk:RCEME Craftsman

Welcome!
Hello, RCEME Craftsman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  03:03, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Image Tagging Image:Colonel_Johnston.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Colonel_Johnston.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 07:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Materials Technician Badge.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Materials Technician Badge.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. BRossow 03:19, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Rceme1944.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Rceme1944.gif. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 17:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RCEME_to_the_rescue_1970.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:RCEME_to_the_rescue_1970.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Rceme1950.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Rceme1950.gif. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 14:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Rceme1952.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Rceme1952.gif. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 05:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Vehtech.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Vehtech.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 00:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

File source problem with File:RCEME to the Rescue 1970.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RCEME to the Rescue 1970.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:38, 7 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Eme-gem1995.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eme-gem1995.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:45, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:EME GEM Maintenance Platoon Structure.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:EME GEM Maintenance Platoon Structure.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:RCEME Craftsman


text:
User talk:Yoshikirb55155

Welcome!
Hello, Yoshikirb55155, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  03:03, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Sabriel
Hey Yoshikirb55155, it's good to see a Sabriel fan.

However, if you see information that is lacking about Sabriel, try focusing on the Sabriel page. It may not be a good idea to have a hundred smaller pages running around. JGorton 03:26, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yoshikirb55155


text:
User talk:Farquard

Welcome!
Hello, Farquard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango  123  03:04, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Mount Royal
Standard has it that the federal district does not need further diambiguation. When the provincial district article is created than it will be at Mount Royal (provincial electoral district). -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:48, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's just that the federal ridings are more important :-). Remember, other provinces have ridings with the same names, so this has been discussed before. For example, the federal riding of Prince Albert is at Yorkton (electoral district) while the provincial riding is at Yorkton (provincial electoral district). -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:56, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's an unwritten standard that most of us agree on. I've tried looking for past discussions on the issue, but can't find it yet. I know there was one though! -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:00, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * OK, me and Fawcett had this discussion in April. See it at his talk page here User_talk:Fawcett5/Archive2 and on my talk page (look for April 30) -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Hull
This is more than just Hull, and I will say separation from the rest of the city has very little to do with it. I hate to say this so many times, but it's what the maps say. And we can source maps, at least. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:33, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Survey
Search the wiki for similar surveys, and set it up like that. But I reckon, someone neutral on the subject should start it, as it is very biased as it is. -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:09, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Votes for deletion/Launie Anderssohn
Hi Farquard,

Frankly, I cannot remember if I counted your vote, but I fear that I did not, in which case I apologize. You're right that I should have.

I might not have closed the VfD if it was 4-2; however, apart from the 4 clear delete votes, I also count the nomination as a delete vote, and in the discussion at the bottom of the page there's another valid delete by Blackcap. So it's 6 to 2, and that is a clear consensus to delete. -- Eugene van der Pijll 10:37, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Ballparks
I see you're adding a section on former ballparks. Kudos! Now, a suggestion... I like to keep things simple. When teams built new structures on existing sites, they often renamed the park or dated the park from the construction date. In my view, that's marketing hype. Example: Tiger Stadium, which is typically dated from 1912, except when it's convenient, like when they were getting ready to leave, and tried to pump up attendance by talking about "Baseball at the Corner since 1896". Well, whatever they want to call it, Bennett Park or Navin Field or Briggs Stadium or Tiger Stadium, it's all the same block of land, and I think it should be listed as a single site, 1896-1999. Another example is the South End Grounds, which was the Braves' home from 1871 through 1914, no matter how many times they rebuilt it or burned it and gave it different names. Similarly, the Polo Grounds, whose diamond stayed in the same place while they rebuilt around it. They dated it from 1911, but the right date should be 1890. And the Crosley Field site, which the Reds occupied from 1884 or some such through part of 1970. Anyway, that's my view. I'd be interested in hearing your view on it. d:) Wahkeenah 00:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

I contend that they should not have separate articles. Those early ballpark articles tend to be small, because there is little to be said about them. I did combine the so-called "Philadelphia Baseball Grounds", a small article, into the "Baker Bowl" article, and then redirected the former to the latter. That's how I think all these old structures should be handled. Wahkeenah 02:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

If it depends on the location of the diamond, you could indeed argue that Tiger Stadium is a different ballpark from Bennett Park; that Redland-Crosley Field is a different park from Palace of the Fans; etc. Yet you've got Sportsman's Park as the home of the Cardinals during the 1880s and from 1920-1966, and of the Browns from 1902-1953, when in fact the diamond was in the southeast corner during the 1880s, the northwest corner during the early 1900s, and the southwest corner from 1908 onward. But the name was not changed, so the three "different ballparks" tend to be regarded as one. Meanwhile, if you've seen photos of the Reds' 1880s ballpark, they actually retained the original grandstand on the southeast corner as a right field pavilion when they built their "Palace of the Fans" and relocated the diamond to the southwest corner. Yet some sources regard them as different ballparks, even though the very same thing was done in St. Louis in 1908. The Reds replaced the entire structure in 1912, of course, the year from which they tended to date their ballpark. Meanwhile, the Indians, Giants and Senators used to date League Park, Polo Grounds and Griffith Stadium respectively from 1910, 1911 and 1911 again because that's when the concrete structures were built, even though the location of the diamond did not change from the earlier structures... and in the case of the first two, the name did not change either. It's these kinds of inconsistences that can be resolved by simply going by location, and reporting these chronological details within the article, rather than going by position of the diamond, naming, or whatever hype the club wanted to use (or not use) at some time or another. Wahkeenah 08:06, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Let me ask you this: You have listed the Polo Grounds as 1890-1957, but you have listed Griffith Stadium as 1911 onward. Yet, in both cases, the diamond stayed in place while they rebuilt the structure around it. Is that not an inconsistent approach? Wahkeenah 18:20, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Oops, you already did it. OK, now a little bit of a history lesson... The Senators played at a different location, called American League Park, during 1901-02 or 03 or some such. Then they moved into an older site, which was once called National Park (the team having been called the Nationals) and it became Griffith Stadium at some point on or after it was rebuilt in concrete. Also, regarding Baltimore, the minor league Orioles stopped playing at the earlier Oriole Park after the 1915 season and moved into the abandoned Federal League facility, Terrapin Park, which was right across the street, in 1916. They renamed it as a newer Oriole Park. When it burned in mid-1944, they moved into Municipal Stadium, a football stadium which was laid out kind of like the diamond in the L.A. Coliseum later, with a short left field and a deep right field. The diamond was in the northwest "corner" of the field of the horseshoe-shaped stadium, whose open end was to the south. The structure was rebuilt as Memorial Stadium in the late 1940s. They actually built the new stadium in sections around the ballfield during the season, starting at the south end and slowly obliterating the previous stadium, until the new horseshoe, with its open end to the north, was sufficiently ready for them to relocate the diamond from the northwest corner to its final location at the south end of the new oval. Got that mental picture? :) Wahkeenah 18:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Looks pretty good. I corrected the end-year on the early Oriole Park. If anyone wonders what happened with the minor league O's during 1916-44, they'll find out all about it on the Memorial Stadium page. I'm guessing you don't really want to get into lists of the Federal League Parks for the most part, or the many extinct teams of the 19th century, but just the linear histories of the current teams. Wahkeenah 19:03, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Launie Anderssohn
hello this is in accordance with laune anderssohn. i play in the band and have been playing with a notable rock band, the dears who are hugely successfull in not only north america but europe as well, playing to crowds of over 100 000 people at festivals, www.thedears.org for any info on validity. this is a notable group people, we are a band making waves and spreading rapidly, yet it seems the dears factor, the keep posts, the 2 countrieds toured, the three re cords, the 800 plus hits on google, the records in radio stations across canada dont seem to matter in the voting process even thoughwe met all the criteria for being kept. this bearcat fellow does not seem to have any notability under his belt. yet he is still on this site, we are a hard working ground breaking band that has been deleted for what i believe is more the content of our music than the actual suggested reasons. please consider us for undeletion (65.94.191.240 03:53, 30 August 2005 (UTC))thank you --65.94.191.240 03:53, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

nice work!
thanks for creating List of most common Major League Baseball post-season matchups!! Kingturtle 18:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

 * [[Image:Edit_Summary-2.png|Edit summary text box]]

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. JoaoRicardotalk 04:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Villemarie.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Villemarie.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Admrboltz (T | C) 22:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Villeraystmichel.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Villeraystmichel.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrboltz (T | C) 22:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Nat'l. baseball teams
Shouldn't it really be South Korean national baseball team and Japanese national baseball team? I think that would be much better style.--ThreeAnswers 05:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Stleonard.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Stleonard.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Stlaurent.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Stlaurent.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Steanne.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Steanne.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Montreal East
You say that Montreal East is the most common name in English. I say it's Montréal-Est. How do we resolve? I don't think I've heard anyone call it Montreal East, (except perhaps those over the age of retirment who still call Deux-Montagne, "Lake of Two Mountains", de la Montagne "Mountain Street" and Trois-Rivieres "Three Rivers"; or those who have never stepped foot in the place).

Normally I'd say, what do English people living in Montreal East currently call it ... but I've never met any! Or what does the town/city itself call itself in English ... but I don't think it operates in English. Have you any good references? All I can suggest is Google, that finds about 30,000 hits for "Montreal East" and 40,000 or so for Montreal-Est (both when restricting searches to English-language pages). Nfitz 23:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Beaconsfieldbaiedurfe.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Beaconsfieldbaiedurfe.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 11:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Anjou.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Anjou.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Tawker 00:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Anjou.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Anjou.png. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 13:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ilebizardstegenesteanne.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ilebizardstegenesteanne.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 04:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cotestluchampstead.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Cotestluchampstead.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZsinjTalk 01:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ilenotredame.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ilenotredame.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:38, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ddoroxboro.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ddoroxboro.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 14:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Verdun.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Verdun.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 18:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Dorvaliledorval.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Dorvaliledorval.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 23:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ilestehelene.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ilestehelene.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Southwest.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Southwest.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 20:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Rosemontptepatrie.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Rosemontptepatrie.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 19:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Lasalle.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Lasalle.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 13:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Montrealnorth.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Montrealnorth.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 20:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Nunsisland.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Nunsisland.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 18:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Pierrefondsseneville.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Pierrefondsseneville.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 01:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Maps of Montréal
Hi Farquard. I would like to ask you if you could upload the files Dollard.png and Hampstead.png in Commons. I've written the articles concerning these two Canadian towns in Catalan Wikipedia and it would be greatful to be able to use these two maps. Thank you so much --Manu bcn 21:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Rdppatmtle.png
Thank you for uploading Image:Rdppatmtle.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 03:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Farquard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Daniel Quinn (politician) -

Nomination of List of most common Major League Baseball postseason matchups for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most common Major League Baseball postseason matchups is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of most common Major League Baseball postseason matchups until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Staxringold talkcontribs 20:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Cotestluc.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cotestluc.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Montrealeast.png

The file File:Montrealeast.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Pointeclaire.png

The file File:Pointeclaire.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Superseded by c:File:Pointe-Claire.png"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax «¦talk¦» 02:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Baiedurfe.png

The file File:Baiedurfe.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality, superseded by File:Carte localisation Île de Montréal - Baie-D'Urfé.svg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax «¦talk¦» 14:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Farquard