text:
User talk:Ticej mora

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 17:46, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

title: User talk:Ticej mora


text:
John Gabriel (actor)

John Gabriel (born Jack Monkarsh; May 25, 1931 – June 11, 2021) was an American actor, singer-lyricist, and producer who is best known for his role as Seneca Beaulac on Ryan's Hope (1975–1985, 1988–1989), for which he received an Emmy Award nomination in 1980. Gabriel, who played the Professor in the original, unaired Gilligan's Island pilot, was the father of actress Andrea Gabriel. He appeared on Broadway in The Happy Time in 1968, and produced the shortlived eponymous television series Charles Grodin starring Charles Grodin in 1995.

Family
Gabriel was born in Niagara Falls, New York, the youngest of three children of Harry and Rae Monkarsh. His parents were of Polish Jewish/Russian Jewish descent. His father was born in then-Mandatory Palestine.

Career
Gabriel, throughout his career as an actor and singer, worked steadily in a wide variety of capacities. He appeared on stage in two Broadway productions, The Happy Time and the musical Applause, as well as off-Broadway in Fighting International Fat at the Playwrights Horizons. Gabriel played numerous character roles in film and television over a period of five decades.

He portrayed Pedro in the John Wayne movie El Dorado and also composed its title song in collaboration with Nelson Riddle.

He starred in Days of Our Lives, General Hospital, and Ryan's Hope.

From 1973 to 1975, he had a recurring role as WJM-TV sportscaster Andy Rivers on The Mary Tyler Moore Show.

As a singer, Gabriel appeared on numerous television shows, including The Ed Sullivan Show, The Merv Griffin Show, The Mike Douglas Show, and Regis and Kathy Lee, among others. He produced the Charles Grodin Show for six years.

Words and Music
In 2004, Gabriel wrote and produced, along with his actress wife Sandy Gabriel, best known for her role of Edna Thornton on All My Children, a nightclub act which he regularly toured across the United States. The show, titled Words And Music, was a celebration of classic American song interspersed with stories culled from Gabriel's vast experience in show business. In 2010, the production was videotaped in Los Angeles.

Death
John Gabriel died on June 11, 2021, at age 90. His daughter attributed his death to complications from Alzheimer’s disease.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: John Gabriel (actor)


text:
User talk:ThunderPeel2001

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 17:46, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Fair use disputed for Image:Watchmen 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Watchmen 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:BTBbeatdis.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BTBbeatdis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Watchmen 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Watchmen 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ABC-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ABC-1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Phil Sandifer 23:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Terra obscura v2 4.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Terra obscura v2 4.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Web H amster 01:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Watchmen 1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Watchmen 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BTBbeatdis.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:BTBbeatdis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Andrew W.K.
Your edit is a definite improvement over what was previously there. I'm still a little sceptical about the whole frontman bit - yes he has grown into the part, but that's quite a usual process in performing artists. It's not really worth making much of a fuss over IMHO. Similarly Steev Mike is hardly worth noting. But you've summed things up well. Wwwhatsup (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

 * I see someone has removed the frontman bit. AWK has now posted a categorical denial. Maybe the whole thing could be summed up even more tersely, perhaps as "Identity confusion", dropping some of the SM detail. Can it be safely concluded, given the sources, that SM is just an early pseudonym? Wwwhatsup (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Hiya ThunderPeel2001. Please avoid replying to people's comments inline, paragraph by paragraph, as you did in this edit. It makes it unclear who wrote each paragraph to which you're responding, and when each paragraph was written. Instead, try to use threaded discussion indentation, as described at Talk_page. I took the liberty of refactoring your post to clarify the flow of discussion. Thanks so much, and happy editing! -Verdatum (talk) 17:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello ThunderPeel2001! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Mark Frost -
 * Pay attention to this bot, if these articles do not have references added in the text of the article using, your article will be deleted! Okip  02:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:GreyshirtIS.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GreyshirtIS.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Robbins Foundation

A tag has been placed on Anthony Robbins Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  DGG ( talk ) 22:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: DeathSpank
Citations do not go in the lead of an article per WP:LEADCITE. If it needs to be referenced, it's to be referenced in the body of the article, which this edit (in which you call me a helpful idiot) already had (see the Development section). I've updated the lead per your last edit, but I should warn you of no personal attacks regarding the edit summary above. Please be civil. --Teancum (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

SlimVirgin and Bradley Manning
Please don't attack other editors. We are all working to improve the articles. Thanks. --John (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * In this instance an editor is explicitly pushing his own agenda above all else. I'd hardly call what I wrote an "attack", but it has been removed now. Is there nobody here ensuring that the truth is reported above individual opinions? Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 19:36, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I removed the personalized heading for you, the above was just a FYI and request not to do it again. See, we use user talk pages (like this one) to discuss personal stuff, and keep article talk for directly discussing the improvements we make to the articles. If you have a problem with Slim, for example, it's best to take it up at her user talk. You need to make the article improvement arguments at article talk, along with your suggestions. Refer to WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:5P. Let me know if you need any more help. --John (talk) 03:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I just checked and see that you have over 1200 edits going back to 2005, for some reason I had assumed you were a newbie. Oh well, please don't take any of the above as patronizing, and it all still applies all the more since you've been around here a while. --John (talk) 03:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't apply any more to me because I've been around since 2005, it applies exactly the same as everyone else, but don't worry I didn't find it patronizing. It's sad to see the way Wikipedia has gone. Nobody gives two shits about putting up a good article anymore, it's more about putting up their own passionate beliefs. SlimVirgin undeniably edited the article to its detriment, but he's got more time on his hands, and is undo-happy. So, who wins? Not the reader of the article. The only time other people seem to get involved is when there's some sort of argument going on between people, but never over an article. Then, people don't have the time. Wikipedia needs to evolve or die, and be replaced by something else. Such a shame, but it was predicted from the beginning. Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 00:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Beck1221.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Beck1221.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Courtney Love/GA1
Courtney Love has been going through a lengthy Good Article review, and is now close to being listed. There now needs to be a bit of tidying up done - trimming some excessive detail, and a bit of copy-editing, as well as building up the lead a bit more. This is one of the top viewed articles on Wikipedia and is on an important yet complex subject. Any assistance, even if only to proof read one of the sections, would be much appreciated.  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  17:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

/* Re: Buffy and Angel episodes Deletion */
I have userfied the article at User:ThunderPeel2001/List_of_Buffy_the_Vampire_Slayer_and_Angel_episodes. Still happy to review when you have something for me to look at. Spartaz Humbug! 05:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! When I find something for you, I'll pass it on. Thanks again. Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 16:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Before I go down the same road, have you already tried to transwiki to the Buffyverse wikia or any other site? MrZaius talk  02:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, yes I've tried transwikiying the page to the Buffy wikia. No luck whatsoever. Quite astonishing really. Link: [Buffy Wikia discussion] This is the problem with Wikia's -- it becomes the opinion of a tiny group of hardcores, and nobody else's opinion matters. These guys DO think it's relevant, but don't want to include it because they think it duplicates their "chronology" page. The fact that nobody is ever going to use their "chronology" page to view the episode ordering doesn't seem to bother them (the "chronology" starts thousands of years BC(!) and includes everything from non-canon novels and comics, to network promotional pilots). Very sad about the whole thing :( Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 17:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello there, i just created this page again, some errors may be there as i basically copy pasted it. The name is the same List of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel Episodes --Adri1995 (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's not going to work dude. Lol ;) Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ResidualVMlogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ResidualVMlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Niihau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jurassic Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Stephan Kinsella
In this edit you've added a notability tag for an article the vfd twice and the result was keep. Kinsella is by far the main intellectual in the anti-ip libertarian camp is quite notable. --MeUser42 (talk) 16:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Let's just say that I remain less than convinced. Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Users (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Users (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Users (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Damaged Goods (record label), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Users (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Twin Peaks
I've created an RFC about creating two season pages of two-season television series. Join in. --George Ho (talk) 04:52, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Showrunner
This is a grey area. As the NYT says: "Each show runner, as the executive producers who supervise the writers are called, has taken the show in slightly different directions". That is how we have described it. Simon was undoubtedly the head writer, but do you have a source that specifically says he was the only showrunner, and was officially considered as such? (I haven't finished the WTF interview yet). Gran2 21:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey! Well it's not all that grey, really. Showrunners are credited as Executive Producers, but not all Executive Producers are showrunners. Jim Brooks was not involved in the day-to-day running of the TV show (although he weighed in), and Matt Groening certainly wasn't appointed by Brooks as a showrunner, having no TV production experience at all! I've just finished reading John Ortved's book, so it's all very fresh in my memory. Maybe I can find a quote in there that explicitly states who the Showrunner was. Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 21:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * OK thanks. If you could provide the quote that would be good (I don't have my copy on hand). I'm aware of the distinction generally but I've always been under the impression it never officially applied in this case, even if Simon did all the work, and like all from Jean/Reiss onwards they were EP and showrunners. But if this is the case then the issue is that it said showrunner rather than just EP. 1/2 are always listed as Groening, Brooks and Simon and that's how it should be here. So I'm going to replace showrunner with EP and when you've found the Ortved page/quote by all means add a second sentence saying that Simon was the sole showrunner. Gran2 22:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Fantastic Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 23:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scott Sanders (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thick as Thieves (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Spare Ass Annie and Other Tales
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Spare Ass Annie and Other Tales, appears to be directly copied from http://artandpopularculture.com/Spare_Ass_Annie_and_Other_Tales. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Spare Ass Annie and Other Tales if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phoenix Festival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marion and The Fall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beck1221.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Beck1221.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 10:26, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buchwald v. Paramount, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deposed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment
A request for comment has been started on an issue you have been discussing at Talk:Doctor_Who. Blethering  Scot  21:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Beck Protocol for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beck Protocol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beck Protocol until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peridon (talk) 16:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sidney Sheinberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazil (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Capitalisation of "the"
Per your edit to Doris & the Daggers, yes, the capitalisation of the t in "the" is common. However, we do not do this on Wikipedia per MOS:CT. Please read the link provided. Also, in prose, we don't capitalise the t anyway—see The Beatles for the main instance. Also, please do not re-capitalise the titles of websites if they don't use a capital t in the first place. Thank you.  Ss 112  04:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but I contest your changes. There is no manual of style which capitalises definite articles, so this is clearly a stylistic choice and not a mistake. (See also: MOS:AMP - also a stylistic choice.) Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 10:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? I said the t in "the" is not capitalised per MOS:CT. That is a link to a Manual of Style page saying don't capitalise the t in "the" as it is a definite article, and articles are not capitalised in titles of works in English. So please don't continue to do so. Furthermore, a capital T in the word "the" is not a "stylisation"; some media outlets capitalise all words; that is irrelevant to our standard rules for titles of works. An ampersand is also not a "stylistic choice" if it is part of the title. Some works use "and"; some use "&". We don't choose for them, so MOS:AMPERSAND does not apply. If you want to reply, please reply on one talk page and don't spread replies between two. Also, you post at the bottom of someone's talk page, not at the top.  Ss 112  10:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please curb your condescending and unpleasant tone. "What are you talking about?" is a rude and obnoxious way to start a comment. WP:AGF I don't know if you read the link you shared with me or not. Quote: "Conventional exceptions include most titles of creative works." In this instance it's clearly the intended part of a title of a creative work. Is it not? Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 10:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Incase you can't find what I'm referring to: MOS:THECAPS Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 10:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Where am I being condescending? I asked "what are you talking about?" because I was confused about what you meant, not because I'm questioning what you're saying. The capital t in "the" is not consistently used in every source talking about the album; also per MOS:THECAPS, "however, some idiomatic expressions, including the titles of artistic works, should be quoted exactly according to common usage". Some titles; common usage. I see no common usage doing a simple Google search for "doris & the daggers" (with quotes). Some use "Doris & the Daggers", "Doris & The Daggers", "Doris and the Daggers". So I think the cover art and sensible use of MOS:CT applies. This album doesn't appear to be extremely popular so there is not a lot of coverage anyway. Regardless, there is no article of quality (i.e. has been edited by experienced editors and not just newly created) on Wikipedia that uses a capital T for "the" in the title of a work if it is not the first word. Please look at some featured articles and you will see what I'm talking about. That's what we do. You've been around since 2005; surely you have seen basically no titles using a capital t for "the" in titles.  Ss 112  10:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You also keep quoting MOS:THECAPS, but you're ignoring one of its examples: "Correct	(title): J. R. R. Tolkien wrote The Lord of the Rings." By your logic, we should capitalise the O and T because it's "the intended part of a title of a creative work" (even though I pointed out the capitalisation of such things is never consistent). They have not capitalised the O and T in "of" and "the" in The Lord of the Rings because it's not correct to do so. MOS:THECAPS does not contradict MOS:CT so please don't cite as if it does.  Ss 112  10:59, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Finally, you're ignoring the first line MOS:THECAPS. "Do not ordinarily capitalise". Only some idiomatic expressions should not be changed. You have not given any argument besides "some sources capitalise the 't'" (when Google search results actually vary and are not consistent) and why this is an exception. Only in special cases do we make exceptions for the titles of works. This doesn't appear to be one.  Ss 112  11:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Quote: By your logic, we should capitalise the O and T because it's "the intended part of a title of a creative work" I have no idea what you're talking about. The intended title of The Lord of the Rings has always been The Lord of the Rings. Never The Lord Of The Rings. Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 14:52, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I was referring to some sources capitalising the O and T in the title, which they do. Some sources capitalise all prepositions and articles in titles. Google it. You don't know what the intention of the artist who made this album is, as you are not them, so please don't imply you do. So you cannot say "Doris & The Daggers is the intended title!" WP:PROVEIT. That would require a direct source with the artist saying, "the T is capitalised".  Ss 112  14:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Again you're not understanding what's happening here. This is about the intended title as set by the owner of the work -- not the artist (the artist may have a different idea, but the if the publisher overrides it, that becomes the official title). Domino Records are the owner of this work, and this is how the refer to it. Much how Allen & Unwin were the publishers of The Lord of the Rings, so setting the intended title. The fact that unofficial sources do not copy the intended title is not override the intended title of the work. Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 15:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I think the artist's opinion matters more than what their record company does. I'm sure some editions of The Lord of the Rings capitalise the t and the o. In fact, I'd bet on it. As for this album, the label isn't even consistent with the title. The first paragraph of http://www.dominorecordco.com/uk/albums/10-01-17/doris--the-daggers/ : "Doris and The Daggers is worth the wait". The title has an ampersand in the title of the website and on the artwork. Then they're using "and". I'm done discussing this. See below.  Ss 112  15:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Quote: I think the artist's opinion matters more than what their record company does. That's not your decision to make. If Sam Raimi prefers The Medieval Dead to be the title of the third Evil Dead film instead of Army of Darkness (which he does), then Wikipedia shouldn't change the title of that well known film to suit his tastes. Quote: I'm sure some editions of The Lord of the Rings capitalise the t and the o. In fact, I'd bet on it. Really? How much would you like to bet? Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 15:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

 * Hi everyone. I am not going to take sides in this debate (in order to remain un-INVOLVED), but I was asked to drop a line because there was some concern about possible edit warring. There should be none of that. Until this disagreement is resolved the title should be left in it's last stable form. If you are unable to reach agreement I suggest moving the discussion to WT:MOSCAPS where you can request outside opinions. Or alternatively take a look at WP:DR for suggestions including a possible 3rd opinion. I do appreciate the fact that you are both discussing this on a talk page which is the right way to go about handling this and I thank both of you for your respective contributions to the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Army of Darkness
Hello! Good point on the title change. I do not disagree that this was on the poster (it most definitely is), but it would be better to get a stronger source. Like, the alternative title needs a source but context helps too. Was it released with this title for home video releases? UK only? I mean, it had this title at the the time, but I think it would be better to just expand on it and give a source that knows its called this. Does that make sense? As for your suggestions, you could use the Raimi commentary with the Cite AV media template, but its an annoying to use as you have to get the timestamp of when he says the information. As for citing yourself, it would be against WP:RS and WP:OR. :D Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It seems silly. It's stable as it was. It's clearly true and so worth including. Removing true information because the source isn't perfect is ultimately detrimental to WP. It's not an untrustworthy source, it's just not perfect. Perhaps someone else can find a stronger one. Until then, I think it should be left on the page as it was. Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 20:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It does not really matter if its true or not because its (sadly) not how wikipedia works) Per WP:VERIFY, "all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources.". Per the same source "Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form".". Also per Naming_conventions (films), "We want to maximize the likelihood of being listed in external search engines, thereby attracting more people to Wikipedia. Using "The Seventh Seal" rather than "Det sjunde inseglet" makes the page easier to find with a search engine, since search engines often give greater weight to the title than to the body of the page. Since "The Seventh Seal" is the most common form of the title, it will be searched on more often, and having that exact string in our page title will often mean our page shows up higher in other search engines." The other titles you gave are minor and we can not even really source where they were or when they were referred to this title. If you can find some third party sources outside sales site (one wouldn't cite ebay, so why amazon?) then go ahead. In the meantime, I'd leave it as it is. When its discussed in Raimi's career or anything it is called Army of Darkness, not the other titles. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you've completely misunderstood my comment. Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Eh? I see you've added them back with a source, but I'd still like some context to them if you could add it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BTBbeatdis.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BTBbeatdis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2020
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (FBI files on Michael Jackson) for a period of 36 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Please also note that your signature on posts does not comply with WP:CUSTOMSIG/P as it does not show your correct user name. 86.146.209.237 (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It is only a nickname, not a fully customised signature. It is easy to identify my username. The only guidelines surrounding the use of nicknames states: "It is common practice for a signature to resemble to some degree the username it represents". It is only common practice, not policy. WikiMane11 (talk) 17:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1112-videogame-logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:1112-videogame-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alerts
Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Re: Entertainment Retailers Association
Re your message: Sorry about the delay getting back to you. Feel free to recreate the article. When I deleted it, it had contained nothing but a restatement of the article title of sorts. It would have fallen under CSD:A3 more than CSD:A7. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 10:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

October 2023
Your recent editing history at Sean Combs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Diannaa (talk) 14:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * This is made in very poor faith, Dianna. You know as well as I that the three revert rule applies to the REVERTER (ie. you). This is not good and if other editors get involved, the fact that you tried to threaten me with an incorrect application of the rules (especially after I'd already told you I would not fight it further), shows you in a very poor light. WikiMane11 (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I only removed it twice. Another editor also objected and removed it. — Diannaa (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Your message implies that you think your edits at Sean Combs were not reverts. Can you confirm that you understand that both of the following edits were reverts?
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Combs&diff=prev&oldid=1178082179
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Combs&diff=prev&oldid=1178085902
 * Thanks. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, I would say the diffs to look at are these:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Combs&diff=1178084506&oldid=1177947456
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Combs&diff=1178085902&oldid=1178084506
 * Yes, they could be said to be technically "re-reversions" (in Wikipedia parlance), but they were also made in good faith (especially given WP:REVEXP was initially ignored). You can see they are not straight reversions of the original edit, but attempts to address the issues raised by the other editors by improving the quality of the sources. WikiMane11 (talk) 21:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Buffy The Origin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Buffy The Origin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your Signature
Hello, ThunderPeel2001,

I was looking at an AFD you participated in and found it very confusing that your signature says your username is "WikiMane11" when it is actually "ThunderPeel2001". This could be misleading and confusing to other editors. Can you either change your signature so that it reflects your username or change your username to reflect your signature? They should be in agreement so other editors know who they are talking to. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

 * Hi Liz, I shall not be doing that per the 2021 RfC on signatures which concluded that it was not a requirement for signatures to include usernames. Never-the-less, I have updated it slightly to bring it closer. Sorry! Hope it's not too confusing for you.
 * Relevant quotes from the discussion's conclusion to save you from reading it all:
 * "There is significant opposition to the point where it is clear there is a consensus that signatures are not required to display someone's username in its entirety, without changes."
 * "There is therefore no requirement that signatures be easily recognizable to a new user as referring to the username they link to."
 * If something has changed in this regard, please let me know. Thanks!
 * WikiMane (TP2001) (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:ThunderPeel2001


text:
User talk:Haggen Kennedy

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 17:47, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

obrigado meu amigo ;)
Aποσω μου ειπαν και αλλοι, οι σχολες ειναι πανω κατω οι ιδιες. Απλα αλλαζουν λιγο οι κατευθυνσεις (αναλογα την σχολη). Επιπλεον οι πληροφοριες που μου εδωσες ειναι πολυ χρησιμες και σε ευχαριστω για αυτο καθως μου εδωσες πανω-κατω να καταλαβω τι "παιζει" με αυτη την σχολη. Αν τωρα βρω τιποτα αλλες αποριες σχετικα με την σχολη θα ζητησω και την γνωμη σου. Σε παραδεχομαι παντως γιατι ειναι πολυ δυσκολο να ασχοληθει καποιος ξενος με μια αρκετα δυσκολη γλωσσα οπως τα αρχαια. Τα λεμε ;) KaragouniS 20:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Μια ερώτηση
Καταρχας καλησπερα! Θα ηθελα να με βοηθησεις με κατι: Φετος εδωσα τις γνωστες μας "πανελληνιες" εξετασεις και κατα 99% περναω Ιστορικο Αρχαιολογικο Κρητης. Ειναι δυσκολη σαν σχολη η θελει τιποτα ιδιαιτερες γνωσεις?Μην φανταστεις οτι ειμαι κανενας εξπερ στα αρχαια παντως (11,8 εγραψα) αλλα με την ιστορια τα παω πολυ καλυτερα (γιαυτο προτιμησα αυτην την σχολη)! Aναμενω μια συντομη απαντηση ;) --KaragouniS 13:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Ancient Greek Wikisource
I understand from your userboxes you're interested in Ancient Greek. I've submitted a proposal to add an Ancient Greek Wikisource on Meta, and I'd be very grateful if you could assist me by either voting in Support of the proposal, or even adding your name as one of the contributors in the template. (NB: I'm posting this to a lot of people, so please reply to my talkpage or to Meta) --Nema Fakei 20:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

hi
Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Hello. I was just wondering how did you learn English so well? You write better than many of my American friends. I am blind and I read braille. I have a braille monitor attached to my laptop so someone thankfully isn't standing over my shoulder and looking at everything. :-) What country are you from? (I will not ask any more than that; I think people asking what city and state is too personal and too invasive; you have to be careful online.) Take a look around my talk page (mostly toward the top and middle) and use section editing as much as possible (meaning that you put your comments at the bottom of the section). If you have general comments, put them under the section where you created when you introduced yourself. Se precisa ajuda com inglês estarei ao seu dispor. :-) (I hope I got that right.) Tenha uma muito boa tarde. learnportuguese (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hamlet.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Hamlet.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Done. :-) Haggen Kennedy (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hamlet.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Hamlet.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Portuguese translation
Hello. I was on Wikipedia:Translators available and notice that you were on the list for Portuguese to English translators and wondered if you could translate Prince Peter of Saxe-Coburg-Kohary? Thank you or obrigado.The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 13:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Please
Is it possible you translate this article? Gratefull. 2804:14C:5BB6:802D:E269:95FF:FE51:FF80 (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Pedir um favor
Será que poderias traduzir este artigo do português para o inglês? Att (Saudações Brasileiras). 187.104.25.153 (talk) 05:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Haggen Kennedy


text:
Talk:Everett Rogers

Untitled
I think the page ought to add that Ev Rogers was considered to be an exceptional TEACHER in addition to being a renowned scholar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.89.58 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

--

And how about something on the nature of his research? Didn't he do fieldwork among farmers? Neither this article nor the one on diffusion theory explicitly states that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pzriddle (talk • contribs) 17:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

to IP 67.95.204.18
Dear 67.95.204.18, I notice you keep deleting whole paragraphs from the Rogers article. Can you please discuss your suggested changes here? Thanks, Renee (talk) 19:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Management
— Assignment last updated by LFCochran (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Everett Rogers


text:
Hochstaufen

The Hochstaufen is the easternmost mountain of the Chiemgau Alps, Germany. It is located in the north of Bad Reichenhall (Landkreis Berchtesgadener Land). The mountain belongs to the Staufen massif and is a popular destination for mountaineering.

In the 17th century there were some mines at the Hochstaufen, the best known gallery was the Doktor-Oswald-Gallery, located only 60 m underneath the summit.

At an altitude of 1,750 m is the Reichenhaller Haus, an alpine hut of the Deutscher Alpenverein (Section Bad Reichenhall).

Routes
The fixed rope route Pidinger Klettersteig was created in 2003 and is one of the most challenging fixed rope routes in Germany.
 * Bad Reichenhall (Padinger Alm) – Barthlmahd – Reichenhaller Haus – Hochstaufen
 * Bad Reichenhall (Padinger Alm) – Buchmahd – "Steinerne Jaeger" – Reichenhaller Haus – Hochstaufen
 * Piding (Urwies or Mauthausen) – Mairalm – "Steinerne Jaeger" – Reichenhaller Haus – Hochstaufen
 * Piding (Urwies or Mauthausen) – Mairalm – Pidinger Klettersteig (fixed rope route) – Hochstaufen
 * Piding or Aufham-Anger – Steiner Alm – Hochstaufen
 * Passage from Zwiesel – Zennokopf – Mittelstaufen – Reichenhaller Haus – Hochstaufen
 * Passage from Zwieselalm – Barthlmahd – Reichenhaller Haus – Hochstaufen
 * Passage from Fuderheuberg – "Steinerne Jaeger" – Reichenhaller Haus – Hochstaufen

Miscellaneous
After heavy rainfalls earthquakes occur at the Hochstaufen, so there are several seismometers of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich around the mountain.

In September 1993 the innkeeper couple of the Reichenhaller Haus was murdered in a brutal robbery.

title: Hochstaufen


text:
Talk:Heribert Illig

old comments
Hey all, How does dendrochronology refute Illig? Reading your post i dont really understand. Thanks.

I removed the reference to dendrochronology because Illig's hypothesis cannot be disproved by it. There will be very few trees belonging to a dated structure, and Illig will explain those away as spurious. E.g. if a Viking boat is found and established to be aged 1200 years by dendrochronology, Illig will just claim it belongs to the year 500 rather than the year 800. dab (ᛏ) 17:48, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Dear Dab, I reverted it again. 1) the lack of credible motives is a separate counter argument. Even if no world conspiracy were needed, it's still doubtful because of the lack of motives. And Illig makes some vague talk about motives, but these are not credible (Otto III wanted to see the millenium ...) 2) Dendrochronology does refute Illig. Wood that can be reliably dated in relationship to events, e.g. in buildings is compared to these big american trees they use for it. Then the events connected with the building are safely within a certain time. Since these all seem to confirm the traditional dating, Illig is refuted. 3) I also added astronomical observations. Str1977 20:35, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * well, you may be right. I am asking for sources. I can give you a source for the Gregorian stuff. So who refuted Illig with what tree. You need a wooden building dated to some precision to dates before 600. Not too may of these exist, I suppose. Name one. dab (ᛏ) 20:45, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Unfortunately I have misplaced my lecture notes from a couple of years ago, where this was covered. I'm currently checking a couple of essays on the topic. Maybe one of these can give me references. I'll post them if they do. Str1977 21:04, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

 * we agree, of course, that the theory is pure nonsense. My concern is to list only strong arguments, and to avoid putting up strawmen for Illig's people to knock down. The density of sources if of course the key argument, it is what makes you shake your head as soon as you hear of the idea, but it is tedious to go through point by point, and Illig can redate all events as he likes. The Gregorian argument, as far as I'm concerned, is the single argument dealing the theory's death-blow. Not only is it strong, but if makes Illig look silly, exposing that his original idea was based on an embarassing mistake, and that he was just too stubborn to withdraw once that fell down. dab (ᛏ) 21:13, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I agree and as soon as I have found a reference I will provide it. Are you German(-speaking)? If you are, I can post you two places of references in general. Str1977 21:42, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * of course, German references will be fine, in a case as obscure as this one, my own references are also in German, I don't think this discussion has crossed the language barrier yet :) dab (ᛏ) 07:24, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Phantom time hypothesis
I moved most of the information that was here to the previously existing page on the hypothesis itself.This page should probably be kept to biographical details, and the refutation of the theory should belong in its article. Feel free to revert my changes if I'm being too bold about this, of course. Factitious 06:03, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * well, since his hypothesis is about the only thing Illig is notable for, we could just make this page a redirect, as far as I am concerned. dab (ᛏ) 12:27, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with Dbachmann. Another point: there are other "phantom time hypotheses" around, and if anyone ever wrote something about these, the pth page could serve as a disambiguation page. I, however, am not knowledgable enough to write anything about these other hypotheses. Str1977 13:26, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * yes, there are New Chronology (Fomenko) and Immanuel Velikovsky, and of course Young Earth creationism. I don't know if these are referred to as "phantom time hypotheses", but I thought that similar with Fomenko's stuff, the title should specify that the article is about Illig in particular. dab (ᛏ) 14:18, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Dbachmann, as a defintion for PTH I'd suggest a claim that a certain period of time and the supposed historical events of that time have not really existed. New Chronology can also mean that the chronology is flawed and some events historiography has separated in fact were simultanously. I don't know Formenko or Velikovsky, but David Rohl works in the 2nd field and thus would not qualify for PTH. Also, I would totally rule out Yound Earth Creationism, since they are dealing with pre-historical times. But I have once heard about a guy who claimed that the entire history from the 1st to the 14th century was invented, namely that Jesus Christ lived in (what we call) the 13th century. Str1977 14:33, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Having now read the artocle on Formenko, I think he's the guy I was talking about. Since he talks a lot about conspiracies and equates different events with each other (in contrast to Rohl), I think Formenko does qualify as a PTH. Str1977 14:39, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * My merging was motivated by the belief that "phantom time hypothesis" referred to a specific theory. Are there references for Formenko and Velikovsky's ideas being called phantom time hypotheses? If so, what would be a clearer term for the theory Illig and Niemitz have been arguing for? Factitious 00:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * "The invented Middle Ages"? (see below) -- but "PTH" is fine for me too. dab (ᛏ) 09:36, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

just as a note, the German article is at de:Erfundenes Mittelalter. dab (ᛏ) 14:34, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Should this page also be proposed for deletion?
As his claim is so radically opposed to the sciences of archaeology, dating, etc., it is incumbent upon Heribert to prove that his claims are more than disatisfaction with current dating methods and supposed radical innacuracies of medieval scribes. This is Heribert's only claim to fame, his only reason for inclusion in the Wikipedia. As such, is it enough to actually justify any page on him? Especially a stub of a page like this one? I think not and, if nobody disagrees, will be nominating this page for deletion as being a current biography of a living person who hasn't done anything notable enough to be included in the Wikipedia other than to promulgate thoroughly implausible theories. Banaticus 08:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * we have a lot of articles on kooks. Iman Wilkens, Stephen Knapp, Anestis Keramidas, Jean Faucounau, you name them, just being a crackpot doesn't mean you won't be featured on Wikipedia. dab (ᛏ) 08:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * See the policy on living people. The time thing is Heribert's only notable contribution that could even remotely qualify him for a current article in the English Wikipedia and that is such rubbish that it just doesn't meet the mark.  He might perhaps qualify to be in the German Wikipedia, though.  Anyway, please see the AfD on his theory. Banaticus 08:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * well, you are free to AfD him, of course. dab (ᛏ) 08:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My proposal would be to merge Illig's thesis into this article and to turn the "Phantom time hypothesis" article either into a redirect or into a disambig page, linking to various similar theses. Str1977 (smile back) 09:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * that's a good solution too. I agree we don't need two articles on Illig's stuff. dab (ᛏ) 09:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll agree to that -- merge the information from Phantom Time Hypothesis into this article and turn that article into a redirect to some other page regarding multiple authors investigations into "lost time", such as the German Wikipedia criticism| Chronology criticism page. Such a page does not currently exist on the English Wikipedia, in fact pretty much none of those guys has a page on the English Wikipedia, which I think underscores my assertion in the Phantom Time Hypothesis AfD that although such may be notable on the German Wikipedia, it's not notable here on the English Wikipedia.  However, if you'd like to create those pages here, dab (or if anyone else would like to), I'll withdraw my AfD, transfer the information over and change Phantom Time Hypothesis into a redirect.  Banaticus 01:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * sounds good. note that if it is notable on de-wiki, it is also notable here, we don't do language-dependent notability (an encyclopedia aims at being a compendium of universal knowledge). dab (ᛏ) 14:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * We absolutely do language-dependant notability determinations on Wikipedia. 1) Note the difference in the Falkland island articles in en.wikipedia (from Great Britain's viewpoint) and sp.wikipedia (Argentina's viewpoint).  2) Some things are notable in one particular country and either everyday occurences in other countries or simply not notable.  For instance, 300 days of sunshine in Southern California is a normal occurance.  300 days of sunshine in Great Britain is newsworthy.  Just as there are some thing in English which aren't notable enough to make it onto the English wikipedia (note that more than 1k pages in this category are deleted from en.wikipedia every day), so too are some things (which may be notable in other countries and other languages) not notable enough to make en.wikipedia.  3) Language is part of the determining factors which determine overall notability of a particular subject.  en.wikipedia is not a catch-all encyclopedia which aims to hold everything, including junk, from every place.  Each article must be examined under its own light and must either stand or fall on its own merits. Banaticus 10:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * sigh, this has nothing to do with language. en-wiki shouldn't hold English language junk any more than Turkmen language junk. Yes, different language editions will tend to be from a different pov, de facto, which is something we try to consciously counter, without of course ever being able to fully compensate for the effect. This is beside the point, you are free to put articles up for deletion on AfD. If they pass AfD, they stay. dab (ᛏ) 10:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Merge
This section is for discussing the merger of Phantom time hypothesis into this article. Since previous merge discussions never seemed to get anywhere one way or another (even though there seemed to be some consensus), I've made this a sort of straw poll.

 * Merge. The recent AFD result was a "keep", but a lot of people supported a merge. Currently there is considerable (if not %80 or more) duplication between the two articles. Looking at Phantom time hypothesis "What link's here", it doesn't really have any articles pointing to it that are not "See also's" (maybe one?). As someone pointed out above the German Wikipedia has a single article. Heribert Illig isn't really known for much that is not related to his theory - the man and theory are fairly inseparable. Heribert Illig is generally seen as a crackpot, as is his theory, making it highly unlikely that much will ever be mentioned about him in other Wikipedia articles. With all these things in mind I think we should merge these into a single article and re-direct Phantom time hypothesis to this article. -- Stbalbach 22:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Don't merge -- maybe delete the bio article. If merging the theory into the bio, there would be the problem of WP:BLP giving extra obstactles for adding criticisms of the theory. --Pjacobi 22:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Are the theory criticisms ad hominem? -- Stbalbach 00:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, they are not ad hominem attacks. Although Heribert is still alive, there is no reason, as far as WP:BLP is concerned, that the two should not be merged. Banaticus 10:07, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

 * merge to phantom time hypothesis. If there are other "theories" with a claim to that title, disambiguate at phantom time hypothesis (Illig). I agree that Illig's notability is entirely due to his misguided theory. dab (ᛏ) 10:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge -- The writer is not known for anything other than the theory. Concept14 16:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Rewritten Article
I rewrote the article, since it handles the person of Illig. Articles on humans are biographic, especially, when there is another article about their work. Illigs thesis is subject of the article phantom time hypothesis, and should be presented and discussed there. - best regards --mmg (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

 * this has been discussed at length last year, and we concluded that there is no grounds for a dedicated biographical article. The only thing that is notable about Illig is his hypothesis, which has its own article. --dab (𒁳) 13:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

 * Okay. If Illig's only notability lies within his thesis, there is no need for an article on Illig, but only on his thesis. Therefore the right solution is, to redirect to Phantom time hypothesis, as you did. Thanks! - best regards --mmg (talk) 14:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 17:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Heribert Illig


text:
Jackie Callura

John Callura (September 14, 1917 – November 4, 1993) was a Canadian featherweight boxer.

He was born and died in Hamilton, Ontario.

Callura won the national featherweight title in 1931 and was a member of the 1932 Summer Olympics team.

In 1932 he was eliminated in the first round of the Olympic flyweight competition after losing his fight to the eventual bronze medalist Louis Salica.

He turned professional in 1936 and became the world featherweight champion by defeating Jackie Wilson in 1943. He defended his title twice until losing to Phil Terranova.

In 1969, he was inducted into Canada's Sports Hall of Fame.

1932 Olympic record
Below is the record of Jackie Callura, a Canadian flyweight boxer who competed at the 1932 Los Angeles Olympics:

 * Round of 16: lost to Louis Salica (United States) by decision

title: Jackie Callura


text:
WRON

WRON may refer to:

 * WRON (AM), a radio station (1400 AM) licensed to serve Ronceverte, West Virginia, United States
 * WRON-FM, a radio station (103.1 FM) licensed to serve Lewisburg, West Virginia
 * Military Council of National Salvation, a military junta in Poland

title: WRON


text:
1979 in Singapore

The following lists events that happened during 1979 in Singapore.

Incumbents

 * President: Benjamin Henry Sheares
 * Prime Minister: Lee Kuan Yew

January

 * 11 January – The Singapore Refining Company is formed by three oil companies, namely Singapore Petroleum Company, Chevron and BP.
 * 24 January – The Singapore Symphony Orchestra is formed, playing its first concert.

April

 * 1 April – The Vocational and Industrial Training Board is formed from a merger between the Industrial Training Board (ITB) and the Adult Education Board (AEB). The Board handles vocational and industrial training until the formation of Institute of Technical Education in 1992.
 * 16 April – Plans for Raffles City, a future mixed-use development, are unveiled with a model shown to the public. The development will include a mall, an office block and 3 hotel towers; with one standing at about 200 metres high. Costing about S$600m, the development was targeted for completion in 1983, but it only opened in 1986.
 * 20 April – Mitsukoshi Garden is officially opened in Jurong.

June

 * 1 June – The first National Courtesy Campaign is launched.
 * 27 June – Sentosa Development Corporation announced a new monorail system that will replace double-decker buses, as well as a new 10-storey luxury hotel on Fort Siloso.

July

 * 1 July – The four-digit postal code system takes effect, replacing the previous system used since 1950. The system, first announced on 25 April, will help in automating mail sorting processes.
 * 30 July – The Ulu Pandan Incineration Plant is officially opened, making it Singapore's first incineration plant.

September

 * 7 September – The first Speak Mandarin Campaign is launched to encourage Chinese Singaporeans to speak Mandarin instead of dialects.

October

 * 15 October – The first automated teller machine (ATM) in Singapore is launched.
 * 20 October – The first McDonald's outlet opened in Liat Towers.

Date unknown

 * Singapore becomes the world's second busiest port in terms of shipping tonnage.

Births

 * 13 February – Jesseca Liu, actress.
 * 2 May – Joscelin Yeo, former national swimmer.
 * 26 June – Alaric Tay, actor.
 * 28 June – Jeanette Aw, actress.
 * 30 June – Rosanne Wong, former singer and 2R member.
 * 10 July – Sun Xueling, politician.
 * 25 November – Chua En Lai, actor.
 * 25 December – Celest Chong, actress and former singer.

Deaths

 * 2 September – Checha Davies - Activist, volunteer, social worker (b. 1898).
 * 3 September – Lim Cheng Hoe - Pioneering watercolourist (b. 1912).
 * 2 November – Jah Lelawati - Bangsawan actress, writer (b. 1937).

title: 1979 in Singapore


text:
Aceh (disambiguation)

Aceh is a province of Indonesia.

Aceh or ACEH may also refer to:
 * Aceh Sultanate
 * Aceh cattle
 * Mie Aceh
 * Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, an enzyme

title: Aceh (disambiguation)


text:
User talk:Donnie Van

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 17:50, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

title: User talk:Donnie Van


text:
1978 in Singapore

The following lists events that happened during 1978 in Singapore.

Incumbents

 * President: Benjamin Henry Sheares
 * Prime Minister: Lee Kuan Yew

April

 * 25 April – Police national serviceman Lee Kim Lai was murdered for his revolver by Ong Chin Hock, Yeo Ching Boon and Ong Hwee Kuan. En route to kidnapping him from his sentry post at Mount Vernon, they also killed the taxi driver, Chew Theng Hin.

October

 * 12 October – The Spyros disaster occurred at Jurong Shipyard, resulting in 76 fatalities.

November

 * 10–11 November – Floods occurred in Singapore, leaving 2 fatalities.
 * 12–14 November – Then Senior Vice-Premier of the People's Republic of China Deng Xiaoping visits Singapore, setting the foundation for China–Singapore relations before being formally established on 3 October 1990. The governments discussed regional security and Deng visited the HDB.

December

 * 2–3 December – Another flood hit Singapore after about 512 mm of rain fell in just 24 hours, causing 7 fatalities.
 * 6–10 December – Evangelist Billy Graham visits Singapore for a crusade.

Births

 * 23 July – Stefanie Sun, singer.
 * 24 September – Jean Danker, radio DJ.
 * 4 October – Amrin Amin, politician.
 * 3 November – Shaun Chen, actor.
 * Desmond Choo – politician.

Deaths

 * 27 February – Tan Teck Neo, philanthropist and socialite (b. 1877).
 * 23 April – Teo Soon Kim, first woman admitted to the Straits Settlements bar (b. 1904).

title: 1978 in Singapore


text:
User talk:Momotaro

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 17:50, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

SUL
I am currently merging this into a unified login. --Momotaro (talk) 14:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. Your SUL request was done at th wiki. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 02:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --Momotaro (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirects?
Why create multiple redirects for place names? Surely they already exist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Robinson Scott (talk • contribs) 12:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I created the redirects because "redirects are cheap", and because I wanted to fix some red links from WP:WikiProject_Red_Link_Recovery/Punctuation. Certainly I could change the links in the individual articles, but creating a redirect will avoid the problem for the future. If someone again links to Newport (Rhode Island) instead of Newport, Rhode Island, the link will work.
 * However, if a redirect would be a very unlikely target, or plainly wrong, I will not create it and change the link instead. --Momotaro (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unimodular form

The article Unimodular form has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Proposed for deletion as WP:DICDEF.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Hand-coding
Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Exact couple for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exact couple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Exact couple until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  20:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

A question
Hi. Back in year 2008, you edited the page Weierstrass p; you virtually created that page. I'm afraid I'm not sure about its accuracy. Could you have a look at Talk:Weierstrass p? Thanks. --Teika kazura (talk) 22:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Momotaro


text: Template:Elizabeth II

title: Template:Elizabeth II


text:
Talk:Hip hop in Birmingham

Graff links
Please can Andy Mabbett explain why he keeps deleting two relevant links to graffiti art in Birmingham? Thanks Nick Boulevard 17:52, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't. HTH. Andy Mabbett 08:28, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

I am guessing that Andy is implying that the links are irrelevant, and I think that he has a point in that UKGraffiti.com is too broad to be a useful link here. Links directly to images of Birmingham graffiti within the site would work, however. Whilst I am here, I will just note that I have copyt edited the article but I think that it could use some inline source citation. Nick, since you created the original article, could you flicker through citing your sources? I can help you with the syntax if you want to go through first putting the sources in as comments like this:  . —Theo (Talk) 19:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Cheers Theo, this one is going to be interesting as I wrote this article from my own life experiences, my brother and I have been a part of this scene ever since the early eighties, this is where wikipedia is a strange affair, if I said that x happened in 1986 but it doesn't exist on the net then it cannot be used, and yet if I were to start a website stating the same info and then cited that website as my source it is less likely to be challenged, I would like to think that people here trust my opinion, if I have taken what I believe to be a fact from the net and it is proved wrong then I will look into it myself but I would never prolong the life of a netpoo! Nick Boulevard 23:28, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Sources need not be net-based. The principle here is that the contents of any article must be verifiable from reputable published sources.  So, you can cite newspapers, magazines, and books as well as websites.  And not all websites are considered reputable; for example, personal blogs are not credible unless you are reporting _about_ the blog. — Theo  (Talk) 00:02, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Thank you Nick Boulevard 01:11, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

Schudio Link
Thanks Theo, re the links: firstly Chu is a Walsall born Graffiti artist who has grown up in and around Birmingham, he is one of the best known local Graffiti artists with most of his artwork between Birmingham and Walsall. He claims to be one of the first truly 3D graffiti artists, IMO his work is now of the highest quality to be found anywhere in the world. Here is an independent site with a few of his pieces. He is fairly unique in that he turned his wall art into digital graffiti and now earns a living sometimes by creating flyers for many Hip Hop nights in London and Birmingham. This is his own site which I believe is relevant to Birmingham graffiti as he is one of the city's finest exports, one of his recent commissions was for world famous Selfridges in the Birmingham Bullring. Nick Boulevard 22:59, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * In which case, put this in the article (without the promotional tone) and cite the site as a reference. —Theo (Talk) 00:10, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Do you know what... after reading my post I thought the same thing but was too tired to be bpthered to edit my post last night, thanks Theo I will do just that. Nick Boulevard 17:37, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

UKgraffiti.com Link
This website is based in Stourbridge, West Midlands and features mainly Birmingham artists like Zuki (who I have met), Chrome (whome I know through a friend), Crise, Corsa and many others whom I do not know of. It is the main UK graffiti website from searching on Google ''Results 1 - 10 of about 1,090,000 for graffiti uk. (0.03 seconds)'' it is to my knowledge the most extensive example of Birmingham graffiti art online and thus acts as a great source for my citing of Birmingham as a city with an extensive Graffiti art culture. Nick Boulevard 23:17, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The site presents itself as a nationwide resource with aspirations to go international. The main page does not make it clear which material is Brummie. That is why I think that we should link to specific elements within the site. —Theo  (Talk) 00:08, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the suggestion, it's a very good idea and as you say will provide a more direct route to the specifically Birmingham Graffiti. Nick Boulevard 17:39, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

Copy edit
Although I concur with [Andy's edit] in general, I have one key concern: The deletion of the word "rapidly" from the second paragraph undermines its sense. Could Nick (or some else with subject knowledge) quantify this even approximately? To be informative it needs to say something like " spread throughout within x years". —Theo (Talk) 14:48, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Ok I will try this, I know of early Graffiti art in the region and I can think of two friends who actually have the photos. I will ask one of them for help as a nice Graffiti art picture could add nicely to the article. The Rapper that is mentioned in the article was an early MC by UK standards. Nick Boulevard 17:42, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

Graffiti as faith art
In my opinion, the para about graffiti as faith art added by User:Nick Boulevard and deleted by User:Pigsonthewind is better suited to the Graffiti article than this one. I say this because I see the Hip hop scene being inextricably tied to music; the associated graffiti is relevant here but graffiti unrelated to a music scene is a step too far removed. —Theo (Talk) 00:56, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

 * I sort of see what you are saying, I guess there have been Christian graffiti artists anyway, his art was a bit poor IMO. Nick Boulevard 01:15, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Hip hop in Birmingham


text:
User talk:Cburnett/People

=July 17, 2005 archive start=

Stuart Davis
I don't want to fight with you over this. But have you heard his recent music? It's not folk by a long shot. It's rock, if it must be categorized. --goethean 17:36, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

 * See the talk page, I explained my edit there. I edited the article before seeing the point on the talk page, sorry. Cburnett 17:38, May 4, 2005 (UTC)

Chris Matthews
Our friend Old Right has made another change to the Matthews bio. Want to take this one? Boisemedia 09:28, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

 * Actually, he only reverted the anonymous user's change. See  which is a null diff. Cburnett 14:27, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Issue at the Replicator article
Hi. You've demonstrated interest in that article. So I was wondering if you'd care to read the issue I'm taking with an anon in the talk page. I apologize in advance for my long comments there. I know it will be a drag to read all of that. But I could use a second opinion on the matter. Thanks, Redux 20:27, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

=July 17, 2005 archive end=

title: User talk:Cburnett/People


text:
Larry Lamb (newspaper editor)

Sir Albert Lamb (15 July 1929 – 19 May 2000), commonly known as Larry Lamb, was a British newspaper editor. He introduced the Page 3 feature to The Sun (for which he was editor from 1969 to 1972, and then again from 1975 to 1981), which saw a dramatic increase in sale in the 1970s. He also applied the term 'Winter of Discontent' to the series of strikes over the winter of 1978–79. He was Deputy Chairman of News Group from 1979 but was transferred to the Western Mail in Australia in 1981, and edited The Australian in 1982.

Early life
Lamb was born in Fitzwilliam, West Riding of Yorkshire, the son of Henry Lamb, a colliery surface blacksmith, and Coronetta Small. Called Albert, he adopted the name Larry from the lamb in Toytown, a BBC Children's Hour radio series.

Lamb was educated at Rastrick Grammar School.

Journalism career
Lamb was editor of The Sun from 1969 to 1972 and again from 1975 to 1981, and also of the Daily Express from 1983 to 1986.

He was northern editor of the Daily Mail in Manchester from 1968 until he was recruited by Rupert Murdoch to take over The Sun (recently bought from IPC). Lamb pioneered the paper's populist style, established the Page 3 feature, which he later regretted, and saw circulation dramatically increase. He insisted that Page 3 models were "nice girls", as "big-breasted girls look like tarts". He also applied the term 'Winter of Discontent' to the series of strikes over the winter of 1978–79.

He was Deputy Chairman of News Group from 1979 but was transferred to the Western Mail in Australia in 1981, and edited The Australian in 1982, where he was nicknamed "Sir Loin" by staff members. He left the Group in 1983 to work for the Daily Express. In 1985, during his time as editor of the Daily Express, Lamb declared that the unconditional release of Nelson Mandela, imprisoned ANC leader in apartheid South Africa, would be "a crass error". After standing down in 1986 he set up his own public relations company, Larry Lamb Associates.

Personal life
Lamb was knighted in the Queen's 1980 Birthday Honours List on the recommendation of Margaret Thatcher.

His nickname was inspired by the Children's Hour character Larry the Lamb. After he received his knighthood, Private Eye magazine usually referred to him as "Sir Larrold Lamb."

Lamb died on 19 May 2000, aged 70. He had been in poor health since suffering a heart attack in 1992.

title: Larry Lamb (newspaper editor)


text:
1976 in Singapore

The following lists events that happened during 1976 in Singapore.

Incumbents

 * President: Benjamin Henry Sheares
 * Prime Minister: Lee Kuan Yew

April

 * 1 April – The Singapore Corporation of Rehabilitative Enterprises (SCORE) is formed to help ex-offenders find employment.

June

 * June - The Pearl Bank Apartments is completed, making it Singapore's tallest and densest residential building in Singapore at that time. The Apartments will soon be demolished after being sold to CapitaLand in an en-bloc sale in 2018, which will be redeveloped into One Pearl Bank by 2023.

October

 * 1 October -
 * The OCBC Centre is officially opened.
 * The Business Times is launched.

December

 * 23 December – The PAP wins all 69 seats in the 1976 General Election.

Date unknown

 * The Queensway Shopping Centre is opened as a sports mall. The mall also hosts Singapore's first public escalators.
 * St James Power Station was decommissioned and its operations is taken over by Pasir Panjang and Jurong power stations.

Births

 * 20 January – Jamus Lim, Singaporean politician.
 * 2 June - Yaw Shin Leong, Singaporean politician (d. 2023).
 * 15 July – Desmond Lee, Minister for National Development.
 * 2 August – Pritam Singh, Leader of the Opposition and Singaporean politician.
 * 2 December – Loretta Chen, theatre director and media personality.

Deaths

 * 4 October – Chua Boon Lay, footballer (b. 1902).

title: 1976 in Singapore


text: Category:Lists of etymologies

title: Category:Lists of etymologies


text:
1974 in Singapore

The following lists events that happened during 1974 in Singapore.

Incumbents

 * President: Benjamin Henry Sheares
 * Prime Minister: Lee Kuan Yew

January

 * 26 January – The Brani Naval Base is officially opened as Singapore's first naval base.
 * 31 January – Laju incident: Japanese Red Army bombs petroleum tanks at Pulau Bukom and hijacks a ferry boat.

February

 * 15 February – The Singapore Cable Car is officially opened to link up Mount Faber with Sentosa, making it the first system to span a harbour.

April

 * 1 April -
 * The Singapore Telephone Board merges into the Telecommunication Authority of Singapore, forming a single statutory board. This will streamline telecommunication services and increase efficiency.
 * The Urban Redevelopment Authority is formed to redevelop the Central Area.

May

 * 2 May - RTS Channel 5 and Channel 8 began its first colour television signal with the first colour comedy programme of The Mary Tyler Moore Show.

June

 * 25 June – Temasek Holdings is formed to manage investments in government-linked companies (GLCs).

July

 * 7 July - RTS Channel 5 began its colour broadcasts at 10:20pm SGT with the first colour programme being a live telecast of that year's FIFA World Cup final between West Germany (two goal) and Netherlands (one goal) narrated by Brian Richmond relayed via satellite transmission was officially named as RTS Color/RTS Colour or RTS Channel 5 Color/RTS Channel 5 Colour. About 2,000 colour television sets were sold in Singapore three days before the match.

August

 * 9 August – RTS Channel 5 and Channel 8 began its officially opening colour broadcasts at 4:44pm SGT with the first domestic colour live programme of Singapore's 9th national day parade was held at the Padang, Singapore for the first time in all four languages.
 * 17 August – A second Satellite Earth Station with an antenna is launched at the Sentosa Satellite Earth Station.

Births

 * 8 April – Adam Khoo, entrepreneur, author, trainer, and stocks and FX trader
 * 16 May – Beatrice Chia, actress and director.
 * 24 June – Andrea De Cruz, actress.
 * 17 August – Low Yen Ling, politician.
 * Corrinne May, singer.

title: 1974 in Singapore