text:
Especially for You

"Especially for You" is a song performed by Australian recording artists Kylie Minogue and Jason Donovan from Donovan's debut album, Ten Good Reasons (1989). The song was released as his album's second single on 28 November 1988 and was written and produced by Stock Aitken Waterman (SAW).

"Especially for You" received many positive reviews from older and contemporary critics, who deemed it one of the strongest of each singer's album, but also dubbed the song a classic. The song had commercial success, reaching number one in the UK, Ireland, Greece, and Belgium and peaking inside the top five in several other countries, including Australia, New Zealand, France, Finland, and Switzerland.

Background
Minogue and Donovan had both appeared on the hit Australian TV series Neighbours, building a considerable following as an onscreen couple in both Australia and the UK. They were also the subject of much media and public speculation about their off-screen romance, which at the time of this release they were still denying, in an effort to protect their privacy.

Minogue had released the album Kylie, while Donovan was working on his debut album Ten Good Reasons. Both singers were produced by Mike Stock, Matt Aitken and Pete Waterman, fuelling speculation in the British press that they were planning to release a duet. SAW and the two singers all denied any plan to do so, with the producers fearing the project would be too "crass" and "commercial", and Minogue expressing concerns a duet would again stir up unwelcome interest in her romance with Donovan.

However, interest continued to rise, as the proposed track was anticipated to coincide with the wedding of Kylie and Jason's TV characters, Charlene Mitchell and Scott Robinson, on British TV, and would also be a strong contender for Christmas number one on the UK charts. An order of 250,000 copies by British retailer Woolworths finally forced the producers to make the record, with the team feeling they could not shun that scale of demand from the market.

The song's title was inspired by a greeting card, with Stock and Aitken fleshing out the lyrics along that theme. With time running short, Aitken and Waterman flew to Sydney to record the vocals with Minogue and Donovan, with the session running all night. Work on mixing was then done in London, with Waterman saying he and Stock hated the first completed version so much that he considered completely dumping the record. A last minute remix by engineer Pete Hammond, which changed the drums and moved the harmony vocals to the opening of the track, satisfied the team and the track was then rushed to release.

The song was released as a single on 28 November 1988 in the UK, and was later included on both Donovan's debut album, and the American version of Minogue's second album, Enjoy Yourself. The song was used in Neighbours on two occasions: Firstly in September 2018 for David Tanaka (Takaya Honda) and Aaron Brennan's (Matt Wilson) wedding, which was the first same-sex marriage for the serial and the first to be screened on Australian television. The song was used again in July 2022 for the series' then-finale episode, which Donovan and Minogue reprised their respective roles as Scott and Charlene.

Impact and legacy
In 2014, Matt Dunn of WhatCulture ranked the song at number four in his "15 unforgettable Stock Aitken Waterman singles" list. In 2015, the song was voted by the British public as the nation's 20th favourite 1980s number one in a poll for ITV, and in 2021, Classic Pop magazine ranked it number 23 in their list of "Top 40 Stock Aitken Waterman songs". In 2023, Robert Moran of Australian daily tabloid newspaper The Sydney Morning Herald ranked the song as Minogue's 75th best song (out of 183), a duet he found better than the one with Nick Cave.

Chart performance
"Especially for You" debuted at number two in Australia and stayed at that position for four consecutive weeks. This marked Donovan's highest peak in Australia, but not Minogue's, after setting a record with her first three singles debuting at number one, and who then went on to have four more number ones. In New Zealand, the song debuted at number four, and peaked at number two. To date, this is Donovan's only single to peak in the top twenty, and was at the time Minogue's longest-charting single in that country, staying for 21 weeks, before being surpassed by "Can't Get You Out of My Head" (2001), which peaked at number one. The song then debuted at number two on the UK Singles Chart, staying there for four weeks, rising to number one for three consecutive weeks. The song stayed in the chart for 14 weeks in total. It was Minogue's second number-one out of seven, and Donovan's first of four. In 2014 the song became one of only 154 singles in UK Official Charts History to reach 1 million sales.

In the European markets, the song debuted at number 39 on the French Singles Chart and rose to number three for two consecutive weeks. This was Minogue's highest peaking single in France until 2001's "Can't Get You Out of My Head". The song debuted at number 73 on the Dutch Top 40, peaking at number four for a sole week, and was her highest peaking song until "Can't Get You Out of My Head". The song spent a sole week at number ten in Norway. The song had debuted at number 15 in Sweden, until peaking at number twelve for a solitary week. In Switzerland, the song peaked at number two for a single week, staying in the charts for fifteen weeks. This was Minogue's highest peaking song until "Can't Get You Out of My Head". The song peaked at number twelve in Austria for one week. "Especially for You" was Minogue's biggest-selling single in the United Kingdom until 2001's "Can't Get You Out of My Head". The duet is also the bestselling Stock Aitken Waterman-penned single, selling more than one million copies to date as of December 2014.

Live performances
Minogue performed the song on the following concert tours:
 * Showgirl: The Greatest Hits Tour
 * Showgirl: The Homecoming Tour
 * Aphrodite World Tour 2011 (only performed during her tour in Manila, Philippines upon request)
 * Kiss Me Once Tour (performed upon request in Liverpool)
 * A Kylie Christmas at the Royal Albert Hall
 * Golden Tour
 * Summer 2019

The song was also performed on:
 * An Audience with Kylie Minogue 2001 TV special, a duet with Kermit the Frog.
 * Sport Relief 2014 duet with David Walliams.

Donovan performed the song on the following concert tours:
 * Doin' Fine Tour 1990
 * Ten Good Reasons & Greatest Hits Tour 2016

In July 2012, Kylie Minogue and Jason Donovan performed the song at the Hit Factory Live concert, their first performance together since 1989. On 9 September 2018, Donovan joined Minogue on stage to perform the song as part of Minogue's headlining set at Radio 2 Live in Hyde Park.

Track listings

 * CD single
 * 1) "Especially for You" (extended) – 5:01
 * 2) "All I Wanna Do Is Make You Mine" (extended) – 6:00
 * 3) "Especially for You" – 3:58

 * 7-inch single
 * 1) "Especially for You" – 3:58
 * 2) "All I Wanna Do Is Make You Mine" – 3:34

 * 12-inch single
 * 1) "Especially for You" (extended) – 5:01
 * 2) "All I Wanna Do Is Make You Mine" (extended) – 6:00

 * 7-inch & Cassette single 2022 Reissue
 * 1) "Especially for You" - 3:58
 * 2) "Especially for You" (Instrumental) - 3:58

Cover versions

 * Wink covered the song in Japanese on their 1989 album Especially for You: Yasashisa ni Tsutsumarete.
 * Denise van Outen and Johnny Vaughan and pop group Steps released a cover version for UK TV Charity BBC Children in Need in 1998 which peaked at number three on the charts.
 * Filipino rock group MYMP recorded an acoustic cover of this song in 2005.

title: Especially for You


text:
Bratton, Wiltshire

Bratton is a village and civil parish in the English county of Wiltshire, about 2.5 mi east of Westbury. The village lies under the northern slope of Salisbury Plain, on the B3098 Westbury – Market Lavington road.

History
The massive earthworks of the Iron Age hill fort known as Bratton Castle (or Bratton Camp) are within the parish.

Bratton was a tithing of the ancient parish of Westbury until 1894, when it became a separate civil parish.

An agricultural machinery business, R & J Reeves & Son, had a central site in Bratton village which became known as Bratton Iron Works. Begun as a blacksmith in 1799, the company became nationally known in the 19th century and was the largest employer in the area. The firm closed in 1970 and the site is now the village play area.

The Stert and Westbury Railway was built across the parish in 1900. The local station was in the adjacent parish of Edington and was called Edington & Bratton; the station closed to passengers in 1952 and to goods in 1963, but the line remains open as part of the Reading to Taunton Line.

Religious sites
The Church of England parish church of St James the Great has 14th-century origins and may be on the site of an earlier church. It was rebuilt in the 15th century; the chancel was rebuilt in 1854 by G. G. Scott, with further restoration by T. H. Wyatt in 1860. The church is Grade II* listed.

A Baptist chapel was built in 1734, enlarged in the 1780s and again in the next century, with the addition of a schoolroom. Pevsner describes the chapel as "externally a gem" and it is Grade II* listed. As of 2018 the chapel is still in use.

A Methodist chapel was built in 1870 and closed in 1952; the building was demolished in 1957.

Schools
In 1846, a National School was built at the top of Batts Lane, Bratton, now called the Butts, and enlarged in 1877. Also around 1846, a British School was established, and the lessons taught included Arithmetic and Algebra, Geography, Grammar, Scripture, Reading, Ciphering, History, and Drill. This school, intended for the use of nonconformists, was in Stradbrook.

In 1928, both schools were closed and their pupils moved to a newly built Wiltshire County Council school, which became Bratton Primary School and was extended in 1982. The former British School became an ex-servicemen's club, while the National School building – known as The Oratory – continued in its role as a Sunday school and church hall, until it was sold for residential use in around 2009.

Landmarks
In the village:
 * A commemorative plaque, complete with industrial cog and brick wall, unveiled in 1993 for the R & J Reeves & Sons Iron Works.
 * A war memorial in the form of a step-based wheel cross.

On Westbury Hill:
 * The Battle of Ethandun Memorial – a large sarsen stone summounting a base of cemented pebbles, unveiled in 2000.
 * The Queen Elizabeth II golden jubilee beacon placed in 2002.
 * A topograph dating from 1968, showing towns and cities which can be seen from the hillside.
 * Westbury White Horse – hill figure
 * Bratton Castle – Iron Age hillfort

Roughly a mile west of Bratton is a former Lafarge Cement factory, which was reduced to a distribution site in 2009. The factory had a 400 ft tall chimney, which was demolished in September 2016.

Notable buildings
The Court House (15th and 17th centuries) and Bratton House (1715 and 1826) are Grade II* listed.

Amenities
The village has a Post Office and village shop, a village hall and a pub, The Duke at Bratton.

Bratton Downs is a biological and geological Site of Special Scientific Interest.

Notable residents

 * Maria Grace Saffery (1773–1858), poet and Baptist hymn-writer, lived in Bratton.
 * Rebecca Smith (1807–1849), last British woman to be executed for infanticide
 * Rev. George Whitaker (1811–1882), clergyman and educator
 * Sir Horace Seymour (1885–1978), British diplomat, Ambassador to China
 * Major General Sir Jeremy Moore (1928–2007), Commander of British land forces during the Falklands War, lived in the village for over 20 years until his death
 * Jack Lauterwasser (1904–2003), cyclist, silver medal winner at the 1928 Olympics, Amsterdam
 * Marjorie Reeves (1905–2003), historian and educationalist, author of Sheep Bell and Ploughshare: The Story of Two Village Families which describes village life

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Bratton, Wiltshire


text:
User talk:VLD

Welcome!
Hi VLD, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 16:18, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:This is me way back when.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:This is me way back when.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BRossow 19:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:This is me way back when.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:This is me way back when.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 14:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:VLD


text:
User talk:RyanLivingston

Welcome!
Hi RyanLivingston, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 16:19, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:RyanLivingston


text:
La 1 (Spanish TV channel)

La 1 (, The One) is a Spanish free-to-air television channel owned and operated by Televisión Española (TVE), the television division of state-owned public broadcaster Radiotelevisión Española (RTVE). It is the corporation's flagship television channel and is known for broadcasting mainstream and generalist programming, including Telediario news bulletins, prime time drama, cinema and entertainment, and major breaking news, sports and special events.

History
It was launched on 28 October 1956 as the first regular television service in Spain. It was the only one until 15 November 1966, when TVE launched a second channel. As TVE held a monopoly on television broadcasting in the country, they were the only television channels until the first regional public television station was launched on 16 February 1983, when Euskal Telebista started broadcasting in the Basque Country. Commercial television was launched on 25 January 1990, when Antena 3 started broadcasting nationwide.

The channel was initially simply referred to as "Televisión Española" until the launch of its second channel in 1966. Since then it received other names, such as "Primera Cadena", "Primer Programa", "TVE-1", "TVE1" or "La Primera" until it adopted its current name "La 1" (La uno) in 2008. Its headquarters and main production center is Prado del Rey in Pozuelo de Alarcón. Although almost all its programming is in Spanish and is the same for all of Spain, TVE has territorial centers in every autonomous community and produces and broadcasts some local programming in regional variations in each of them, such as local news bulletins, in the corresponding co-official language.

On 1 January 2010, TVE stopped broadcasting commercial advertising on all its channels, with only self promotions, institutional campaigns and sponsorships allowed.

With analog service discontinued on 3 April 2010, it has only been available free-to-air through the digital terrestrial television (DTT) ever since. La 1 and Teledeporte started their DDT HDTV resolution simulcasts on 31 December 2013, initially in 720p and later in 1080i. With standard-definition feed discontinued on 11 February 2024, the UHDTV regular simulcast in 4K resolution was launched nationwide.

Criticism and controversy
Due to its status as a public service and pioneer television channel in Spain, La 1 has been criticized on numerous occasions for aspects related to its programming. Within TVE's offer, the first channel has been characterized by a general offer that competes directly with a private television, relegating any alternative or public service space to La 2. This practice has been maintained even after the withdrawal of advertising in 2010.

The Association of Viewers and Radio Listeners (ATR) denounced in 2005 that La 1 had been the channel that had broken the Self-regulation Code on Television Content and Children the most times, a total of 169 times. For its part, the management of the channel assured that many of the documented complaints had been based on "subjective criteria".

Since 2014, there has been a debate on television schedules in Spain: for reasons of screen share, prime time has been delayed in recent years until 10:30 p.m. and many programs ended at dawn. That same year, TVE signed an agreement with the Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality for a "healthy use of television", which implied bringing forward the programming hours and ending them before 00:00. However, La 1 has not fulfilled the commitment in its prime time and some spaces such as the MasterChef Celebrity final have even ended at two in the morning.

Information Services
One of the most controversial aspects is the work of information services. The appointment of the presidency of RTVE, responsible in turn for the rest of the departments, has historically depended on the Congress of Deputies by absolute majority, without the need for consensus. For this reason, it is considered that the editorial line of the Telediario, the news program with the most audience in the entire group has been tilted in favor of the government in power, both during the Franco's dictatorship and in current democratic Spain. There have been denunciations of disinformation in the governments of Adolfo Suárez, Felipe González,   José María Aznar,  in the latter case including a sentence from the National Court for "violation of trade union rights" in the news coverage of the 2002 general strike.

The government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero changed the system for electing the presidency of RTVE in 2006, through a consensus of two-thirds of Congress, with the intention of granting more independence to the information services. However, Mariano Rajoy's executive recovered the previous model in 2012 to resolve the power vacuum in the radio station. Since then, the TVE News Council (made up of the house's employees) has reported more than 70 cases of alleged malpractice on the newscast and on the weekly report, all of them related to current affairs: the various cases of corruption affecting the Popular Party, the Bárcenas case, the focus of the pro-sovereignty process in Catalonia,   or the positioning of news in the rundown. In addition, some journalists have denounced the gestation of a "parallel newsroom" to which the most sensitive information would be entrusted.

In September 2017, the Cortes Generales approved a new election system on RTVE that recovered the previous consensus model and established a public contest for the election of the presidency. The new system was applied in February 2021, after three years of temporary administration of a sole provisional administrator.

title: La 1 (Spanish TV channel)


text:
Namibia People's Liberation Front

The Namibia People's Liberation Front was an alliance of moderate political parties in Namibia. It was formed in 1978 by the Voice of the People Party, the Damara Executive Committee and the Bondelswarts Council. The Damara Christian Democratic Party joined the NPLF in 1979, but withdrew in 1986.

title: Namibia People's Liberation Front


text:
Zag

Zag or ZAG may refer to:

Places

 * Zag, Kentucky, US
 * Zag, Mongolia, a district
 * Zag, Morocco, a town
 * Zagreb Airport, Croatia IATA airport code

People

 * Zag de Sujurmenza, 13th-century Spanish astronomer
 * Zag, of English band Zag and the Coloured Beads

Other uses

 * AZGP1 (Zinc-alpha-2-glycoprotein)
 * Zaghawa language, ISO 639-3 code
 * Zag numbers, a type of alternating permutation
 * Zag Industries, acquired by Stanley Black & Decker in 1990
 * Gonzaga Bulldogs, known unofficially as the Zags
 * TrueCar, Inc., formerly Zag.com

title: Zag


text: User:Lofty

title: User:Lofty


text:
Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act

The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is a Uniform Act drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1997. The UCCJEA has since been adopted by 49 U.S. States, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. , the only state that has not adopted the UCCJEA is Massachusetts.

The UCCJEA vests "exclusive [and] continuing jurisdiction" for child custody litigation in the courts of the child's "home state," which is defined as the state where the child has lived with a parent for six consecutive months prior to the commencement of the proceeding (or since birth for children younger than six months). If the child has not lived in any state for at least six months, then a court in a state that has (1) "significant connections" with the child and at least one parent and (2) "substantial evidence concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships" may assume child-custody jurisdiction. If more than one state has "significant connections" and "substantial evidence...", the courts of those states must communicate and determine which state has the most significant connections to the child. A court which has made a child-custody determination consistent with UCCJEA has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over the determination until either (1) that court determines that neither the child, the child's parents, nor any person acting as a parent has a significant connection with the State that made the original order and that substantial evidence is no longer available in the State concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships, or (2) that court or a court of another State determines that the child, the child's parents, and any person acting as a parent do not reside in the State that initially made the child custody order.

A previous Uniform Act, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, set out jurisdiction rules for initial custody determinations that were inconsistent with the federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act. Additionally, there were contradictory interpretations of the PKPA. The UCCJEA corrects these problems and adds uniform procedures to register and enforce child custody orders across state lines.

Initial custody determination
To determine which state has proper jurisdiction to make an "initial determination" of child custody, the UCCJEA proceeds in the following order of priority:
 * 1) The state which is the "home state" of the child, or was the child's home state within six months immediately before the commencement of child custody proceedings if the child is absent from the state, but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in the state;
 * 2) If no state has jurisdiction under #1, then jurisdiction is proper where the child and at least one parent have a significant connection with the state (other than mere presence), and substantial evidence concerning the custody determination is available in the state;
 * 3) If no state has jurisdiction under #1 or #2 above, jurisdiction is proper in any state having an appropriate connection with the child.

A state having jurisdiction under #1 or #2 above may decline to exercise its jurisdiction, and transfer it to another state if it is more convenient for the parties, or if one of the parties has engaged in misconduct necessitating a change.

"Home state" is defined as the "state in which a child lived with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child-custody proceeding. In the case of a child less than six months of age, the term means the state in which the child lived from birth with any of the persons mentioned. A period of temporary absence of any of the mentioned persons is part of the period."

For example, young Chris has lived in Iowa with his mother and father for the last three years. If the mother moves to Minnesota, but Chris remains in Iowa, then Minnesota will not have jurisdiction to determine custody over Chris. Iowa is the only state that can determine custody at this point.

Exclusive, Continuing jurisdiction
Once a state court has made a custody determination, that state keeps jurisdiction over all matters concerning that child, unless:
 * 1) A court of the state with jurisdiction determines that the child or the child and a parent do not have a significant connection with the state, AND evidence concerning the child's custody determination is not available in the state; OR
 * 2) A court of the state with jurisdiction, or any other state, determines that the child and both parents or acting parents do not reside in the state any longer.

For an example of #1, the parents divorce in Texas, and mother and children move to Mississippi. The father continues to live in Texas and the children maintain a significant connection to Texas by visiting Texas often and spending their summers there. Three years later father files suit in Texas to modify custody. The mother attempts to transfer jurisdiction to Mississippi. The UCCJEA, which was designed to prevent forum shopping, prevents her attempt by providing protection to an issuing court's jurisdiction that made an initial child custody determination unless: ..."or... the child's parents, and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in this state".

For an example of #2, parents divorce in Texas, mother and children move to Mississippi, Father moves to California. Because the children and both parents no longer live in Texas, the courts of Texas will have lost their exclusive, continuing jurisdiction to modify their own custody orders. For most practical purposes, that means that jurisdiction to modify those orders will most likely not be in Texas, but, rather, in the state where the children and at least one parent have taken up residence (here, Mississippi).

Modification of custody determination
Once a custody determination has been made, a court of another state does not have authority to modify the determination, unless the state with jurisdiction determines that it does not have jurisdiction as noted above, or any state court determines that the child, parents, and any acting parents do not reside in the state which has jurisdiction.

To continue with the example of an initial custody determination above, let us say that Chris' father gets custody of Chris in the Iowa courts, and the mom moves to Arkansas. If Chris spends the summer with his mom in Arkansas, his mom cannot go to the Arkansas courts and attempt to modify custody - Iowa has continuing jurisdiction.

Emergency orders
A state which does not otherwise have jurisdiction may enter a temporary emergency order, if the child is in danger and needs immediate protection. After issuing such order, the state court should determine if there is an existing custody order from another state in effect. If there is an existing order, the emergency court must allow a reasonable time period for the parties to return to the state having jurisdiction, and argue the issues to the court with jurisdiction.

If there is no previous child custody order in existence, the emergency court's order will remain in effect until a determination is made in a court having "home state" jurisdiction over the child. If no determination is made, and the emergency court's state becomes the home state of the child, the emergency order becomes a final determination of custody...


text:
Širvintos District Municipality

Širvintos District Municipality (Širvintų rajono savivaldybė) is a municipality in Lithuania, it is in territory of Vilnius County and its capital is Širvintos.

Geography
The territory of the municipality is 906 km². Širvintos City, 5 towns – Bagaslaviškis, Čiobiškis, Gelvonai, Kernavė, Musninkai and 485 villages are in the municipality. Forests occupy 27.7% of the whole region’s territory.

The biggest rivers of the region are Neris, Širvinta and Musė. There are 28 lakes; the largest of them is Alys, which covers 1.65 km2, and the deepest is Gelvė, which is 25 m deep.

Heritage
In the territory of the region are Kernavė’s Historical Reservation, botanical reserves for growing cranberries in Alionys, Bartkuškis (there's an old castle) and Lygaraistis, 6 parks and 2 nature monuments (Staškiūniškiai Larch and the stone with a “devil’s footprint” in Dūdai). Also there are 50 archaeological monuments, 16 architectural monuments, 15 historical monuments and 78 art monuments, 18 manor houses with parks.

Population
According to the population census of 2001, 20,207 people live in the region: 9,545 men and 10,662 women. 7,273 people live in towns and 12,934 people live in villages. About 10% (2,019 people) declared Polish nationality.

There are 4,982 people of retirement age: 3,433 women and 1,549 men. 11,186 people are employed. 52% of all working people work in state institutions.

title: Širvintos District Municipality


text:
List of active French Navy ships

This is a list of active French Navy ships. The French Navy consists of nearly 100 vessels of the Force d'action navale (Naval action force) and the 9 submarines of the Forces sous-marines (Submarine force). Primary assets include one nuclear aircraft carrier, three amphibious assault ships, four air-defence-focused destroyers, six anti-submarine (ASW)/land attack mission-oriented destroyers, five general-purpose frigates, and six surveillance frigates. The Navy also operates some 15 patrol ships, supplemented by additional coast guard/Maritime Gendarmerie vessels. The surveillance frigates and a significant number of the patrol vessels are based in France's overseas territories.

The submarine force consists of five nuclear attack submarines and four nuclear ballistic missile submarines.

Integral to supporting the Force d'Action Navale at sea are the French Navy's 2 replenishment oilers, 16 mine countermeasure vessels and 8 support ships. In addition to the above units, the Navy operates five survey vessels, four experimentation ships, four ocean tugboats, 14 training vessels as well as numerous smaller vessels and tugs.

The main base for French naval forces in the Atlantic is located at Brest while the principal base in the Mediterranean is Toulon.

The French Navy does not use the term "destroyer" in vessel names. Instead, surface combatants of the first rank (such as the Aquitaine class) are named "frigates", though they are registered as destroyers (with hull numbers "Dxxx").

Major surface combatants
The French Navy does not use the term "destroyer". While officially classed as "frigates", the larger major surface combatants of the first rank are nevertheless registered as destroyers (with hull numbers "Dxxx"; though, as of 2023, French Navy vessels are incrementally having hull numbers removed from display on all ships).

Training
For a complete list of Bâtiments de soutien (Auxiliaries) see Bâtiments de soutien at the official Marine Nationale website.

Silhouettes
Silhouettes of major fleet units:

title: List of active French Navy ships


text:
Negative refraction

Negative refraction is the electromagnetic phenomenon where light rays become refracted at an interface that is opposite to their more commonly observed positive refractive properties. Negative refraction can be obtained by using a metamaterial which has been designed to achieve a negative value for (electric) permittivity (ε) and (magnetic) permeability (μ); in such cases the material can be assigned a negative refractive index. Such materials are sometimes called "double negative" materials.

Negative refraction occurs at interfaces between materials at which one has an ordinary positive phase velocity (i.e., a positive refractive index), and the other has the more exotic negative phase velocity (a negative refractive index).

Negative phase velocity
Negative phase velocity (NPV) is a property of light propagation in a medium. There are different definitions of NPV; the most common is Victor Veselago's original proposal of opposition of the wave vector and (Abraham) the Poynting vector. Other definitions include the opposition of wave vector to group velocity, and energy to velocity. "Phase velocity" is used conventionally, as phase velocity has the same sign as the wave vector.

A typical criterion used to determine Veselago's NPV is that the dot product of the Poynting vector and wave vector is negative (i.e., that $$\scriptstyle\vec{P}\cdot\vec{k}<0$$), but this definition is not covariant. While this restriction is not practically significant, the criterion has been generalized into a covariant form. Veselago NPV media are also called "left-handed (meta)materials", as the components of plane waves passing through (electric field, magnetic field, and wave vector) follow the left-hand rule instead of the right-hand rule. The terms "left-handed" and "right-handed" are generally avoided as they are also used to refer to chiral media.

Negative refractive index

One can choose to avoid directly considering the Poynting vector and wave vector of a propagating light field, and instead directly consider the response of the materials. Assuming the material is achiral, one can consider what values of permittivity (ε) and permeability (μ) result in negative phase velocity (NPV). Since both ε and μ are generally complex, their imaginary parts do not have to be negative for a passive (i.e. lossy) material to display negative refraction. In these materials, the criterion for negative phase velocity is derived by Depine and Lakhtakia to be

 * $$ \epsilon_r|\mu|+ \mu_r |\epsilon| < 0,$$

where $$\epsilon_r, \mu_r$$ are the real valued parts of ε and μ, respectively. For active materials, the criterion is different.

NPV occurrence does not necessarily imply negative refraction (negative refractive index). Typically, the refractive index $$n$$ is determined using

 * $$ n =\pm\sqrt{\epsilon\mu}$$,

where by convention the positive square root is chosen for $$n$$. However, in NPV materials, the negative square root is chosen to mimic the fact that the wave vector and phase velocity are also reversed. The refractive index is a derived quantity that describes how the wavevector is related to the optical frequency and propagation direction of the light; thus, the sign of $$n$$ must be chosen to match the physical situation.

In chiral materials
The refractive index $$n$$ also depends on the chirality parameter $$\kappa$$, resulting in distinct values for left and right circularly polarized waves, given by

 * $$n = \pm\sqrt{\epsilon_r\mu_r} \pm \kappa$$.

A negative refractive index occurs for one polarization if $$\kappa$$ > $$\sqrt{\epsilon_r\mu_r}$$; in this case, $$\epsilon_r$$ and/or $$\mu_r$$ do not need to be negative. A negative refractive index due to chirality was predicted by Pendry and Tretyakov et al., and first observed simultaneously and independently by Plum et al. and Zhang et al. in 2009.

Refraction
The consequence of negative refraction is light rays are refracted on the same side of the normal on entering the material, as indicated in the diagram, and by a general form of Snell's law.

Electromagnetic interactions

 * Bloch's theorem
 * Casimir effect
 * Dielectric
 * Electromagnetism
 * EM radiation
 * Electron mobility
 * Permeability (electromagnetism)*
 * Permittivity*
 * Wavenumber
 * Photo-Dember
 * Impedance

title: Negative refraction


text:
Lakeland Bus Lines

Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc is a privately chartered and apportioned bus company headquartered in Dover, New Jersey. Lakeland operates commuter routes from Morris, Sussex, Somerset and Essex Counties, New Jersey to New York City.

Routes
Lakeland Bus Lines provides service along three routes, each named for the corridor on which it travels.

Casino Line Service
Lakeland Bus Lines provides service along routes for day or overnight trips to Atlantic City Casinos, Mount Airy Casino Resort in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, and Wind Creek Bethlehem in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.

title: Lakeland Bus Lines


text:
User talk:Allen Moore

Welcome!
Hi Allen Moore, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 16:22, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Allen Moore


text:
User talk:Ino5hiro

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 16:24, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Unicode damage
This edit damaged some of the interwiki links. This is usually caused by older versions of some browsers. MediaWiki has a workaround to transparently avoid such damage while not preventing you from editing; however, it's keyed by the browser's version. Could you tell us which browser you were using and which User-Agent it uses, so it can be added to the list of unicode-damaging browsers? --cesarb 19:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

No Personal Attacks
Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Civility and No personal attacks. Thanks and happy edits. --TheFarix (Talk) 18:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Otafest
As I have pointed out several times before, including on Otafest's talk page, the staff of Otafest has not been releasing their attendance figures since 2001, which was 700 attendees. Because of that, it presents a barrier to their listing on the List of anime conventions. Wikipedia uses verifiable information, not someone's best guess, or assumptions. The Otafest staff can easily remedy the situation by issuing a press release with their 2006 attendance figures and submitting those figures to a reporting site, such as AnimeCons.com. I don't understand why they don't. --TheFarix (Talk) 12:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Hmm, that's a pretty good point. Perhaps, though, you could point out these fact in a more obvious manner.  It's still fairly off-putting to have your edits removed because they didn't match up to previously non-obvious standards.  I realize that those con organizers are putting you in that position, but you need to make it more obvious to random passers by what's happening. --Inoshiro

Catastrufuck
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Catastrufuck. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Slowking Man 06:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Lovely Message
This is to inform you that Noitanod would like you never to post on his talk page again, and to not revert articles that are perfectly good, and last but not least, learn to use Twinkle properly before using it.

Saskatchewan WikiProject
Hello. A new WikiProject about Saskatchewan has been started as an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. If you would like to participate, you can Saskatchewan articles, add Saskatchewan content, or visit the project page, where you can join / edit the project and/or contribute to the discussion. WikiProject Saskatchewan  SriMesh |  talk  02:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

University of Saskatchewan Celebrate the Anniversary

 * Please would you visit Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive and vote for this University of Saskatchewan article!!!  There is an aim to achieve feature status with the University of Saskatchewan article on wikipedia. Tell any and all other Saskatchewan editors / students / alumni you know who wiki to vote also please!!!  Help requested. Thank you!!! SriMesh |  talk  02:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hyundai Stellar

A tag has been placed on Hyundai Stellar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Lightbluerain (talk) 14:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The SD tag has been removed. David notMD (talk) 18:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ino5hiro


text:
User talk:Bosniaco

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 16:23, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Draža Mihailović
Please don't just revert my edits to articles. At least read them and change specific things. I have improved (IMHO) your edits on Mihailovic, using my last revision of the article as you changed back many small detail/typographic corections. Such phrases as "not knowing the true nature of the Chetnik movement" are POV. If you have something to add, please give sources. If you want to discuss it further please drop by my talk page -- estavisti 19:45, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
 * I noticed you keep reverting other users edits to this page. I would encourage you to talk to an administrator to end this edit war. There is a rule against doing more than 3 reversions in 24 hours, though I'm not sure if this applies here. KI 21:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Novi Pazar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Novi Pazar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use .)  See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Linnea 08:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Revert warring.
Please stop revert warring. I politely asked on the Talk:Bosnian War not to use revertion, but to work on the last version of the article if you have concerns about the contents, because I also fixed many technical and spelling issues. I have to remind you that you should be civil and stop accusing others for nationalism, revisionism and vandalism in edit summaries like these:, ,. Thanks. Duja 03:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Chetniks1942.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chetniks1942.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chetniks1992.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chetniks1992.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Međeđa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Međeđa.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 01:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Neatwords.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Neatwords.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 01:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chetniks_with_Fascists.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chetniks_with_Fascists.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Survivor_of_Chetnik_Crimes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Survivor_of_Chetnik_Crimes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:Grb Sandzaka.gif, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 17:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chetnik crimes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chetnik crimes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chetniks_Massacre_of_Bosniaks.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chetniks_Massacre_of_Bosniaks.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Repost of Instrukcije
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Instrukcije, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Instrukcije was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Instrukcije, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Instrukcije itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Cetniksgroup.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Cetniksgroup.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Cetniksgroup.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Cetniksgroup.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Djurisic Izvjestaj.jpg. The copy called Image:Djurisic Izvjestaj.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chetniksslaughteringcivilians.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chetniksslaughteringcivilians.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 15:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing
Please stop vandalizing the Mihailovic article, I havent removed anything from the article, i´ve just made it more neutral. And please dont use sockpuppets to make me brake the 3rr rule. Paulcicero 11:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Drazas Instrukcije.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Drazas Instrukcije.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Đukić (Sandžak)"
A page you created, Đukić (Sandžak), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ŦħęGɛя㎥ 02:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Drazas Instrukcije.jpg
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Drazas Instrukcije.jpg, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Drazas Instrukcije.jpg and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Drazas Instrukcije.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Drazas Instrukcije.jpg.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Drazas Instrukcije.jpg/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Drazas Instrukcije.jpg saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 213.198.218.219 (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Djurisic Izvjestaj .jpg saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 213.198.218.219 (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Djurisic_With_Germans.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Djurisic_With_Germans.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 09:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Djurisic_Iron_Cross.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Djurisic_Iron_Cross.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 09:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Report Djurisic.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Report Djurisic.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Drazas Instrukcije.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Drazas Instrukcije.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  02:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Bosniaks of Turkey.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bosniaks of Turkey.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk  05:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Draza Mihailovic
Hi. I noticed you undertook a very substantial edit of this article, replacing much of the existing sourced information. This article has undergone an extensive rewrite during a long mediation. The result has been posted in the article space. Further improvements are being discussed on the talkpage. The editors have also agreed to abide by talkpage rules in order to avoid too much argument preventing article improvment. Feel free to take part in discussions. However, wholesale alterations without prior discussion and consensus are unlikely to be agreed. Fainites barley scribs 13:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Original research at Đukić (Sandžak)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Đukić (Sandžak), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
 * Hi! I was wondering why you have cited several sources that have no mention (repeat: None) at all of the data you have put in the article. After I added the WP:OR template (three times), you reverted it, and your comment was "This is a family history page. Do NOT cannibalize it! Mind your own business!". Unless you find the sources backing up "your" article, which I doubt you will, it will be erased. Furthermore, I ask you to see No original research, Ownership of articles, etc. --Zoupan (talk) 22:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Đukić (Sandžak)
I've listed the Đukić (Sandžak) article for deletion. See the talk page as well. --Z oupan 18:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Đukić (Sandžak), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Đukić (Sandžak)
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Z oupan 17:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.--Z oupan 21:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

 * Đukić (Djukic) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Illyrian, Albanian, South Slavic, Macedonia, Hellenic and Tutin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Z oupan 11:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Đukić (Djukic)

A tag has been placed on Đukić (Djukic), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing, namely the recreating of a page that has been deleted per discussion (Articles for deletion/Đukić (Sandžak)). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 12:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Recreating previously deleted OR-articles

 * created Đukić (Sandžak), which was deleted (Articles for deletion/Đukić (Sandžak)), and then recreated it (deleted again), then recreated it yet another time at Đukić (Djukic), which was also deleted, and the user was blocked.
 * created Đukić (djukic) (which was moved to Đukić family), which is a copy of the above, deleted article.

As of March 26, 2013.--Z oupan 16:14, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Upper Kolasin.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Upper Kolasin.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 18:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bosniaco


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Pepe Pizzeria Napoletana

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Postdlf 04:57, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Frank Pepe Pizzeria Napoletana
Advertising.-- BMIComp (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep There are many, many articles about individual restaurants in Wikipedia.  (See category:restaurants.)  Shall we delete them all?  Pepe's is a particularly notable  one because it's not only an important part of New Haven culture, but it also has historical significance as the supposed first pizza restaurant in the United States.  As the author the page, I have no connection at all to the restaurant, but I'm a former resident of New Haven, have eaten there many times, and I tried to write an unbiased article about it.  Dr.frog 16:30, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. As with Sally's Apizza, there appears to be a problem with this VfD page and how it is linked to main VfD page.  Dcarrano 18:48, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, based on claim to being first pizza place in US. The article should originally have been written with that info in the first paragraph, since it is the basic justification for the entry.  I missed it myself on a skim.  (This has now been fixed.)  Dcarrano 18:48, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * I copied it into the end of the first paragraph. I'd like to see verification of this or at least citation that many people actually believe it.RJFJR 18:57, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Ok, I did a little bit more investigation, and I found some usenet references to it.
 * I copied it into the end of the first paragraph. I'd like to see verification of this or at least citation that many people actually believe it.RJFJR 18:57, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Ok, I did a little bit more investigation, and I found some usenet references to it.

 * First pizza place Well known  There are stories about how -- BMIComp  (talk) 20:38, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Actually, the main justification for the entry is that Pepe's and Sally's are considered a kind of mecca among pizza fanatics, and are also significant as the originators of New Haven-style pizza. I've had foodie friends from all over the US make special trips to New Haven just to eat the pizza --  aside from Yale University, it's probably the thing the city is most famous for.  Dr.frog 19:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep as per Dr.frog royblumy 00:31 13 July, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep, it's a notable place both locally and pizza-culturally. Gzuckier 04:19, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Apizza and redirect there. This and Sally's are the best-known exponents of the little-known Apizza phenomenon. --Angr/undefined 07:17, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as above, or send to Wikitravel. Radiant_ >|< 09:47, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yay, a random pizzeria!  (Which is funny because other users have compared articles on schools and a housing project to being the equivalent of a pizzeria, and not notable).  Look, it's a real place and this is an informative article.  There won't be any harm to Wikipedia or to the massive accumulation of knowledge we're undertaking here by keeping this article.  Moncrief 21:54, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep! Always has an hour+ wait, has been around for 80 years, and is indeed a pizza mecca. (Reportedly, Frank Sinatra used to send his driver here from New York city to fetch clam pizzas!) Pictures of US presidents eating there line the walls. Has a reasonable claim to "first pizza" in the US. Very important to New Haven culture. A good article about a notable subject with potential for expansion. Brighterorange 16:28, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Chainy

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 16:23, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Sayanythingisarealboy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sayanythingisarealboy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chainy


text:
It's No Secret (Kylie Minogue song)

"It's No Secret" is a song by Australian singer-songwriter Kylie Minogue taken from her debut studio album Kylie (1988). The song was written and produced by Stock, Aitken and Waterman, who were also the producers of Minogue's first four studio albums. The song was intended to be released as the fifth single from Kylie, but due to the success and longevity of Kylie's massive selling duet with Jason Donovan, "Especially for You", over Christmas 1988 and the following new year, it was only released in a handful of countries. In the United States, "It's No Secret" was released as Kylie's third single where it reached the top 40 of the Billboard Hot 100.

Background
Originally scheduled to be released worldwide, "It's No Secret" was cancelled in most territories in favour of "Hand on Your Heart", a brand new track, which was released in April 1989 and was the first to be released from her second album Enjoy Yourself. Eventually, the song was only released in USA, New Zealand, Canada and Japan. A still from the video of "It's No Secret" was used as the cover of the "Hand on Your Heart" CD and cassette in the UK, while the track itself was also used as the B-side to its follow-up, "Wouldn't Change a Thing" which was released in July 1989.

Due to its limited release and therefore, no promotion, the song was not a huge commercial success, but it did well enough to promote its parent album Kylie from which it was released. "It's No Secret" debuted at number 47 on the New Zealand Singles Chart, where it only peaked for a sole week. In February 1989, the song climbed to number 37 on the US Billboard Hot 100, managing to peak inside the Top 40. In total, the song spent a total of thirteen weeks in the Hot 100, making the song one of Kylie's longest-running singles on the chart.

An accompanying music video was shot for the single in Port Douglas, Australia. It features a vague storyline with Minogue having an argument with her boyfriend because he keeps taking money from her and she eventually finds out he's also interested in another girl. She walks around reflecting on her unhappy relationship until she eventually finishes with him. The final scene is of Minogue walking blissfully down a train track, a single woman once again. The video to "It's No Secret" opens Minogue's second official video collection, Kylie: The Videos 2, which was released in the UK and Australia in November 1989 and was a big seller. Minogue promoted "It's No Secret", performing it on Live at the Hippodrome, a UK television show, and in a rare all-live with band US appearance on The Arsenio Hall Show and Club MTV.

Chart performance
"It's No Secret" debuted at number 47 on the New Zealand Singles Chart, where it peaked for one week, which is Minogue's worst performing single in New Zealand. In December 1988, the song debuted at number 90 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100, managing to peak at number 37 in February 1989. In total, the song spent a total of thirteen weeks in the Hot 100, making the song one of Minogue's longest-spanning single on the chart itself.

Critical reception
In 2023, Robert Moran of Australian daily tabloid newspaper The Sydney Morning Herald ranked the song as Minogue's 171st song (out of 183), deeming that "[Minogue]'s yelling rather than singing (over the highest-pitched funk guitar you've ever heard)".

Music video
The clip was shot in Port Douglas, Queensland. It starts with Kylie behind the counter of a diner, her boyfriend asking for money, she later sees him with another girl and walks out. Next she alights off a train and she is seen walking down a train track amongst the cane fields in a strapless top and jeans, arriving at a beach house, singing to a photo of her ex-boyfriend, sitting beside a waterfall, arriving poolside in a dress at Mirage resort Port Douglas and lastly on the beach.

Formats and track listings
These are the formats and track listings of major single releases of "It's No Secret".

North America 7" vinyl single and cassette single
 * 1) "It's No Secret" – 3:55
 * 2) "Made in Heaven" – 3:20

North American 12" vinyl single
 * 1) "It's No Secret" (Extended) – 5:46
 * 2) "Made in Heaven" (Maid in England mix) – 6:16

Japanese 7" vinyl single
 * 1) "It's No Secret" – 3:55
 * 2) "Look My Way" – 3:35

Japanese 3" CD single
 * 1) "It's No Secret" – 3:55
 * 2) "Look My Way" – 3:35

Japanese 12" vinyl single New Zealand 7" single
 * 1) "It's No Secret" (Extended) – 5:46
 * 2) "The Loco-Motion" (Sankie Mix - long version) – 6:54
 * 1) "It's No Secret" – 3:32
 * 2) "It's No Secret" (Instrumental) – 3:32

Australian 12" single
 * 1) "It's No Secret" (Extended) – 5:46
 * 2) "It's No Secret" (Instrumental) – 3:55

iTunes digital download EP
 * 1) "It's No Secret" (7" Mix) – 3:32
 * 2) "It's No Secret" (Extended Version) - 5:46
 * 3) "It's No Secret" (Alternative Extended Version) - 5:27
 * 4) "It's No Secret" (7" Instrumental) - 3:30
 * 5) "It's No Secret" (7" Backing Track) - 3:30
 * 6) "It's No Secret" (Album Instrumental) 3:56
 * 7) "It's No Secret" (Album Backing Track) 3:57
 * 8) "Look My Way" (Instrumental) - 3:36
 * 9) "Look My Way" (Backing Track) - 3:36

title: It's No Secret (Kylie Minogue song)


text:
User talk:Wtiger46

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 16:26, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wtiger46


text:
User talk:Kcsefalvay

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 16:23, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kcsefalvay


text:
Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Special Intelligence Service

Special Intelligence Service (July 19)

 * Nominated on 16:24, 12 July 2005 (UTC); needs 5 votes by July 19.

During World War II, the FBI created this special branch to counter Nazi activities in South America.

Support:
 * 1) RJH 16:24, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Tearlach 22:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) EatAlbertaBeef 15:53, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 20:42, July 20, 2005 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Lofty

Archived Talk

 * Archive 1

File:Gibralter in Europe(revised).GIF listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gibralter in Europe(revised).GIF, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 14:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

File:450px-Imbut.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:450px-Imbut.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Islamic republics
Template:Islamic republics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 11:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Cathedrals of the Catholic Church in the United Kingdom and Ireland
Template:Cathedrals of the Catholic Church in the United Kingdom and Ireland has been nominated for merging with Template:Catholic Bishops and Archbishops in England and Wales. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Four Loves
Template:The Four Loves has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  13:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lofty