text:
Mitsubishi 380

The Mitsubishi 380 is a mid-size car that was produced between 2005 and 2008 by Mitsubishi Motors Australia. Available only as a sedan, it marked the end of Australian production by the Japanese manufacturer.

The 380, given the model designation DB, was the successor to the Mitsubishi Magna / Verada line of vehicles first introduced in 1985 (1991 for the Verada). The company spent over A$600 million developing and producing the car, being heavily based upon the ninth generation Mitsubishi Galant designed in the United States. The 380 continued Mitsubishi Australia's established habit of producing front-wheel drive sedans for the Australian market, and along with the Toyota Aurion, competed against traditionally well-established local rear-wheel drive Ford Falcon and GM Holden Commodore vehicles.

Even before the car's launch in October 2005, the 380 was stigmatised as the "make or break" model for Mitsubishi Australia. After a slow sales start, the line-up was updated with the Series II in April 2006, with the entry-level model attracting a price discount of nearly 20 percent. To generate further interest in the car, a Series III revision came on 29 July 2007 with mainly cosmetic changes. These updates failed to lift sales, and with production still unprofitable, Mitsubishi ceased manufacturing of the 380 in March 2008 after just short of three years in production. A total of 32,044 were produced over the three year production, of which 30,195 were sold in Australia.

Development
The development of the 380 began in 2002, when company executives in Japan gave approval to Mitsubishi Australia to commence work on two closely related vehicles. The first of which was a right-hand drive variant of the ninth generation Mitsubishi Galant, designated the codename PS41. This was to be the replacement for the Magna and Verada. The second, which was planned to be launched in 2007 was a long-wheelbase version known internally as PS41L to be produced in both left- and right-hand drive configurations. However, as Mitsubishi's financial woes worsened, and DaimlerChrysler pulled-out of the DaimlerChrysler-Mitsubishi alliance, PS41L was abandoned in 2004 and the likelihood of PS41 making it into production looked even more doubtful. Company research conducted in mid-2004 revealed that 84 percent of Australians believed that Mitsubishi would cease production in Australia. To reinstate consumer confidence in the brand, before the launch of the 380, a series of television commercials began airing in December 2004. Centralised around Mitsubishi Australia's then CEO Tom Phillips, the advertisements promoted the introduction of an industry-first five-year/130000 km warranty. Mitsubishi reworked a slogan from former Chrysler chairman Lee Iacocca, concluding their commercials with the tagline, "if you can find a better-built, better-backed car anywhere, then buy it".

In total, A$600 million was spent on developing the 380, including $250 million on upgrading the Adelaide production facility to manufacture the vehicle. This included the installation of a new body press, casting the body sides from an individual piece of steel. This has the effect of producing a 0.7 mm size differentiation from body-to-body, compared to the industry standard of 1 - 1.5 mm in 2005.

The name 380 was chosen as a fresh start to Mitsubishi's sale of its sole Australian-made vehicle, given that the Magna name was now synonymous of slow-selling vehicle that was long overdue for a replacement. Indeed, among the seven names short-listed from a total of 220, Magna was not one of them. According to then CEO, Tom Phillips, the chosen name polled the best and, at the official launch, he stated "'380' conjured up images of high technology, European standards, sophistication and performance with consumers. All of those attributes correlate directly with the positioning of our new car, and when added to the build quality that we are renowned for and a large 3.8-litre engine, '380' was a natural choice for the name of the car".

Design
From the very beginning of the project, Mitsubishi had always intended that the PS41 would be set apart from the North American Galant in terms of exterior styling. The problem was that PS41 had to share the same basic foundation and the side profile was to remain for the most part unchanged. A revamp of the Clovelly Park facility allowed for the use of more robust bodies. The consequence of this is the tooling required to produce the panels. This gave Mitsubishi the opportunity to make several low key variances to the design. These came in the form of larger front guards, a revised bonnet, new headlamps as well as grilles and bumpers.

The front-end of the PS41 was originally penned by Mitsubishi's design chief, Olivier Boulay. Boulay was also responsible for the 2003 Magna/Verada facelift, but this update fared poorly with buyers. When DaimlerChrysler pulled out of their alliance with Mitsubishi in 2004, it put an end to Boulay-designed Mitsubishis. This allowed for one final chance to progress the exterior design. However, with little more than a year until production, the redesign was shared between Mitsubishi Australia and its parent in Japan. The basic design that was reserved for the base and mid-luxury models was devised by the Japanese studio, whereas the sports oriented design that was conceived locally was reserved for the sports and upper-luxury models within the 380 range.

Engineering
Compared to the Galant, there were changes to 70 percent of the car to create a car more suited to the Australian market. Roads, legislation and consumer preferences were all driving forces behind the changes. The rear of the floorpan had to be overhauled to accommodate a full-sized spare wheel, and superior rear side members were required to improve towing capabilities. Body rigidity was also improved to deal with Australian road conditions. The improved body stiffness resulted in better vehicle dynamics, which were also supported through the use of sophisticated suspension designs, new shock absorbers and stabiliser bars.

The 380 was a sedan only and its sole powerplant was an all-new 3.8-litre V6 engine codenamed 6G75, which was also compatible for LPG fuel. Notably, unlike the practice adopted with its predecessor, the 380 sports models (VRX and GT) did not feature a higher output engine relative to other models in the range. The five-speed manual 380 ES (a five-speed sequential automatic was optional on the ES) was actually the fastest vehicle in the range. The new 175 kW and 343 Nm engine was capable of propelling the car from 0 - 100 km/h in 7.6 seconds. Because of the choice of gear ratios, the manual and automatic transmission equipped 380s had the same acceleration figures.

Models
Between September 2005 and April 2008, the 380 was produced and marketed in three series, as listed below.

DB (2005–2006)
The 380 went on sale on 13 October 2005. The range consisted of a 380 base model, the LS, LX, VRX and GT models. Standard equipment included: twin front and side airbags, climate control air-conditioning, cruise control, power windows, trip computer, steering wheel audio controls, and Bosch 8.0 anti-lock braking system. There was also a Limited Edition sold from September 2005 and into 2006.

DB Series II (2006–2007)
On 28 April 2006, Mitsubishi announced price reductions with the introduction of the Series II upgrade. The entry model, now called the ES, was reduced from A$34,490 to $27,990. An SX model was introduced, priced at $32,990, while the LS model was dropped. Prices on VRX, LX, and GT models were also reduced by amounts ranging from $1,500 to $3,000. Mitsubishi announced that up to 1,500 retail customers who paid the old price would be eligible for a factory rebate of up to $2,000. There were essentially no mechanical or visual changes.

The 380 received the 2005 Australia's Best Cars Large Car award, as well as Insurance Australia Group's rating as the most secure Australian family car, Safest Australian Car Built 2006 for its four-star ANCAP result, Best Fleet Car by Delivery Australia magazine, and Lowest Running Costs in the Australian Motoring Clubs Report. The 3.8-litre engine won an award for engineering excellence from the Society of Automotive Engineers.

DB Series III (2007–2008)
Mid-July 2007 saw the release of the 380 Series III, with range and price alterations designed to attract further sales and increase private buyer interest. The price of the ES model rose by $1000 but was compensated for by the addition of alloy wheels, fog lights and traction control. A total of four models comprised this range: ES, SX, VRX, and GT.

Unlike the Series II, the new series saw all models received subtle visual and trim changes.

Available with either a five-speed manual or automatic transmission, standard features on the ES included traction control, front and side air bags, automatic climate control air conditioning, power mirrors, power windows, power driver's seat, steering wheel-mounted remote audio controls, and anti-lock brakes with electronic brakeforce distribution (EBD). Also featured in the ES were alloy wheels and sports front bumper treatment with front fog lamps. Next in the range, the auto-only SX adds sports seats with a unique grey trim, leather steering wheel, six-disc CD stereo with multifunction colour LCD display, sports rear bumper, 17-inch alloy wheels and sports-tuned suspension. The VRX featured a more comprehensive sports styling package, adding charcoal accents on the front and rear bumpers, high-profile rear wing, polished and painted 17-inch alloy wheels. Inside the VRX, blue seat fabric was added, as well as "VRX" embroidery on the front seats. Embroidered, silver-stitched leather was available as an option. The VRX was available with a five-speed manual or automatic transmission. The range-topping and automatic-only GT model featured standard leather trim, painted and polished 17-inch alloy wheels, integrated boot spoiler and chrome boot garnish, and side rubbing strips. Mitsubishi offer a no-cost luxury option for the GT, aptly titled the GTL. The GTL sported a more conservative rear light treatment, silver-painted alloy wheels, sunroof and a beige-on-black interior treatment.

At the Series III launch, Mitsubishi released two special edition variants. The Sports Edition, based on the ES, added 17-inch alloy wheels, high-profile rear wing, sports-tuned suspension, black interior trim and sunroof, for no extra cost.

The 380 VRX "Fusion Burst" was based on the VRX and comes in a limited-edition orange hue. Apart from the colour, the Fusion Burst came with sunroof and matching seat fabric for no extra cost.

TMR 380
Team Mitsubishi Ralliart (TMR) is an independent motorsport outfit that has also been affiliated with Mitsubishi Motors Australia to market higher performance model variants of the standard Mitsubishi range (in the same mould as FPV, HSV and TRD for Ford, Holden and Toyota Australia, respectively). In 2008, TMR produced the TMR380, a performance-enhanced version of the Series III 380 VRX model on which it was based. It was powered by a supercharged version of the standard 3.8-litre V6 engine, now producing 230 kW and 442 Nm. The car was claimed to take six seconds over the 0 - 100 km/h sprint and was sold exclusively painted in TMR Red with a full body kit, 19-inch chrome alloy wheels and twin chrome exhaust tips. Its retail price was A$56,990, lower than its direct rival, the TRD Aurion). In total, 15 units had already been assembled at TMR's Dandenong facilities with another five on the way from Adelaide for conversion, when Mitsubishi Motors Australia announced the end of local production. All 20 models are individually numbered.

Production and sales

As a consequence of the first DB series selling in fewer numbers than expected, on 20 January 2006, Mitsubishi Australia announced that voluntary redundancies would be offered to 250 production employees to bring production in line with customer demand. In March 2006 the manufacturing plant closed for three weeks. Apart from launching limited editions (essentially base models with greater equipment levels), Mitsubishi took the drastic steps of applying significant price reductions for both the Series II and Series III.

While the 380 was exported to other countries in small numbers, in the interest of salvaging local production, Mitsubishi Australia had also entered into negotiations with Proton of Malaysia over the possibility for a large export program. Under this program, a rebadged 380 would have replaced the Proton Perdana executive model, however, this deal never succeeded.

On 5 February 2008 Mitsubishi Motors Australia announced that the Clovelly Park plant would be shut down on 31 March, and Mitsubishi would pursue a "full import strategy" for the Australian market due to unviable 380 sales. The last 380 sedan (a silver Platinum Limited Edition, body number 32044) left the production line on 27 March 2008. The car was auctioned in late April 2008, with the $100,000 final price being donated to charities chosen in consultation with the winning bidder, John Hughes Group, a car dealership based in the suburb of Victoria Park, Western Australia. The similar second to last vehicle is exhibited at the Birdwood Motor Museum.

In October 2009, the president of Mitsubishi Motors, Osamu Masuko revealed in hindsight that it "was good that we closed the plant in March 2008 because this was the time the economy was still good and employees could find reemployment."

 * Production and sales data

The 380 was also sold in New Zealand.

title: Mitsubishi 380


text:
Ach Gott, wie manches Herzeleid, BWV 3

Ach Gott, wie manches Herzeleid (Oh God, how much heartache), BWV3, is a church cantata by Johann Sebastian Bach. He composed the chorale cantata in Leipzig for the Second Sunday after Epiphany and first performed it on 14 January 1725. It is based on the hymn published by Martin Moller in 1587.

Bach composed the cantata in his second year as Thomaskantor in Leipzig as part of a cantata cycle of chorale cantatas, for the second Sunday after Epiphany. The work is based on a hymn without evident connection to the prescribed readings. It is a meditation on Jesus as a comforter in distress, based on a medieval model. An unknown librettist reworked the ideas of the 18 stanzas in six movements, retaining the words of stanzas 1, 2 and 18 as movements 1, 2 and 6. Similarly, Bach retained the choral melody in three movements, set as a chorale fantasia in the opening chorus with the bass singing the cantus firmus, as a four-part setting with interspersed recitatives in the second Movement (music)|movement, and in the closing chorale. He scored the cantata for two oboes d'amore, strings and continuo, with an added trombone to support the bass in the first movement, and a horn to support the soprano in the last movement.

History and words
Bach composed the cantata in his second year as Thomaskantor in Leipzig as part of his second annual cycle, planned to consist only of chorale cantatas based on Lutheran hymns. He wrote the cantata for the Second Sunday after Epiphany. The prescribed readings for the Sunday were taken from the Epistle to the Romans (we have several gifts – ) and from the Gospel of John (the Wedding at Cana from John 2 ).

The cantata is a chorale cantata based on the hymn "Ach Gott, wie manches Herzeleid" in 18 stanzas attributed to Martin Moller (1587). It is a paraphrase of the Latin "Jesu dulcis memoria", a medieval hymn attributed to Bernard of Clairvaux, a meditation on Jesus as a comforter and helper in distress. The unknown librettist retained the words of stanzas 1, 2 and 18 as movements 1, 2 and 6. In movement 2, stanza 2 is expanded by paraphrases of stanzas 3–5, while movement 3 is a paraphrase of stanza 6; movement 4 incorporates ideas from stanzas 7–14, and movement 5 relies on stanzas 15 and 16. In movement 2, stanza 2 is expanded by paraphrases of stanzas 3–5. Movement 3 is a paraphrase of stanza 6. Movement 4 incorporates ideas from stanzas 7–14. Movement 5 relies on stanzas 15 and 16. The poet did not relate his text to the reading from John 1:2.

Bach led the first performance of the cantata on 14 January 1725.

Scoring and structure
Bach structured the cantata in six movements. An opening chorus and a closing chorale frame a sequence of alternating recitatives and arias. The first recitative is unusual: the chorus sings one line of the hymn's four lines, continued each time by a soloist in words of the poet. The last aria is a duet. Bach scored the work for four vocal soloists (soprano (S), alto (A), tenor (T), bass (B)), a four-part choir and a Baroque instrumental ensemble of horn (Co) to double the cantus firmus in the closing chorale, trombone (Tb) to reinforce the bass in the opening chorus, two oboes d'amore (Oa), two violins (Vl), viola (Va), and basso continuo. The autograph score bears the title: "Dominica 2 post Epiphanias / Ach Gott! Wie manches Hertzeleyd. / à / 4 Voci. / 2 Hautb: d'Amour / 2 Violini / Viola. / e Continuo / di J. S. Bach", which means "Sunday 2 after Epiphany ... for four voices, 2 oboes d'amore, 2 violins, viola and continuo by J. S. Bach".

In the following table of the movements, the scoring and keys follow the Neue Bach-Ausgabe. The keys and time signatures are taken from the book on all cantatas by the Bach scholar Alfred Dürr, using the symbol for common time (4/4). The continuo, played throughout, is not shown.

Music
Bach uses a melody of "Herr Jesu Christ, meins Lebens Licht" which appeared first in the Lochamer-Liederbuch. The melody appears in the opening chorus, sung by the bass as a cantus firmus, in the second movement, as a four-part setting with interspersed recitatives, and in the closing chorale.

1
In the opening chorus, "" (Ah, God, how much heartache), the cantus firmus is in the bass, which is doubled by the trombone, as in Ach Herr, mich armen Sünder, BWV 135. Its mood of lamentation is supported by "elegiac sounds" of the oboes d'amore, sighing motifs in the strings, and the upper voices reflecting the oboe motifs. John Eliot Gardiner, who conducted the Bach Cantata Pilgrimage in 2000, notes that Bach used a repeated motif of six notes in chromatic descent, which is often used in chaconnes of the Baroque opera to express grief. The motif is used for the instrumental opening, each entry of a voice, interludes and conclusion.

2
The recitative, "" (How difficult it is for flesh and blood), combines the hymn tune sung by the four-part choir, with interpolated text sung by the soloists in turn. The lines of the hymn are separated by a joyful ostinato motif derived from the chorale tune. The musicologist Julian Mincham writes that the "hybrid recitative provides an excellent example of Bach's experiments of investing long texts with sustained musical interest".

3
The bass aria, "" (Although I experience the fear and torment of Hell), is accompanied by the continuo. It expresses the contrast of Höllenangst (hell's anguish) and Freudenhimmel (heaven of joy), with inestimable sorrows (unermessnen Schmerzen) disappearing into light mist (leichte Nebel).

4
A tenor recitative, "" (My body and spirit might despair), expresses trust in Jesus to overcome despair.

5
In the duet for soprano and alto, "" (When cares press upon me), in "bright E major", as the Bach scholar Christoph Wolff writes, the voices are embedded in a "dense quartet texture". He concludes that the movement "banishes human care by means of joyful singing". The Bach scholar Klaus Hofmann notes that the obbligato motif, which is later picked up by the voices, is played by the oboes d'amore and violin in unison, providing "a new and remarkable tone colour". Bach refers to the Cross, as mentioned in the text, by using a cross-motif in the melody and applying double sharp marked by a cross. The voices intensify words such as dringen (press) and singen (sing) by extended coloraturas.

6
The closing chorale, "" (If my heart remains pure in faith), is a four-part setting. The choral melody, now in the soprano, is reinforced by a horn.

Recordings
The selection is taken from the listing on the Bach-Cantatas website.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Ach Gott, wie manches Herzeleid, BWV 3


text: User talk:156.111.216.115

title: User talk:156.111.216.115


text:
Talk:Silvertone record label

Please dont delete this
as i have now managed to link Zomba Records and The Stone Roses to this. i will update with more info if and when i find it. i also linked from an unrelated article which shared the same name.

title: Talk:Silvertone record label


text:
User talk:Cmjl

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --JYolkowski // talk 01:10, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

title: User talk:Cmjl


text:
White Horse Bridge

The White Horse Bridge is a footbridge that crosses the tracks at Wembley Stadium railway station leading up to Wembley Stadium in Wembley Park, England. It was designed by Steve Chilton for architects Marks Barfield and engineered by Halcrow. It replaced an old concrete footbridge which was probably built for the British Empire Exhibition. The project also included the construction of a public square.

The bridge's name was chosen in May 2005 after a BBC Five Live poll. It is named after a Metropolitan Police horse named 'Billy', that was used to restore order after the huge numbers of spectators (estimated at between 200,000 and 300,000) who turned up to witness the 1923 FA Cup Final, the first to be held at the old Wembley Stadium, spilled onto the pitch before kick off. Although grey in colour, the horse appears as white in contemporary black-and-white photographs and films.

Unlike the old footbridge, the new structure was designed to cope with up to 12,000 people an hour, the estimated number of users during match days. The bridge and square opened in 2008. They now give easy access from the Chiltern Line to London Designer Outlet.

Naming
In May 2005, the naming decision took place in the form of an online poll hosted by BBC Five Live in conjunction with the London Development Agency (who were building the bridge and who had conceived the idea of a public poll) and won from a shortlist of Live Aid (in memory of the 1985 concert held at the stadium), Sir Alf Ramsey (being England's 1966 World Cup-winning manager), Sir Bobby Charlton and Sir Geoff Hurst (two of Sir Alf's team).

The LDA received over 670,000 nominations from all over the world. The name with the most nominations, however, mainly coming from Germany, was Dietmar Hamann, who scored the last goal at the old Wembley Stadium. This was a qualification game in October 2000 for the 2002 FIFA World Cup, with a German 1–0 win against England. The LDA decided to name the bridge White Horse Bridge instead.

title: White Horse Bridge


text:
Nevada State Route 839

State Route 839 (SR 839) is an 18 mi road that runs from the Nevada Scheelite Mine to U.S. Route 50. The road is also known as Nevada Scheelite Mine Road. Prior to the 1976 mass renumbering of Nevada State Routes this road was a disconnected segment of State Route 31.

title: Nevada State Route 839


text:
Talk:Common whitetail

Untitled
Hmm, that picture looks more like a Twelve-spotted Skimmer to me. --Arkuat 01:11, 2005 July 14 (UTC)
 * If you have strong knowledge on this, please change it - it was id'd from a book with only a limited range of species shown. seglea 17:21, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I changed it for a picture that I took myself yesterday --Qazwer00 2006 June 18

I'm more comfortable working with text than with pictures, but perhaps to teach myself more about how to work with graphics in our Wikipedia, I'll try to find a good picture of a Common Whitetail (unencumbered by copyright, of course) and bring it up here. In the meantime, perhaps this picture could be moved to Twelve-spotted Skimmer after someone doublechecks it against Google images. Note that both these species are sexually dimorphic, just to add to the confusion. And by the way, thanks for working on dragonfly articles. --Eric Forste AKA Arkuat 02:26, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Taxobox image
The image currently in the taxobox is a juvenile male that hasn't got its white tail yet, not a female. Females have a different pattern on the wings, very similar to Libellula puchella, but with a shorter body.  —Cel ithemis  05:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Female
I've uploaded an image of a female to commons. Please use if it's appropriate. Image:FemaleCommonWhitetail.jpg--fleela ±alk 19:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * That's a nice photo, but it's another male.  —Cel ithemis  22:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Mating
I uploaded a photo of mating whitetails to commons, but I don't know how to create a link; new to Wiki today.

EinsteinsdogEinsteinsdog 21:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't find it over there—what is the filename, or what is your username on Commons?  —Cel ithemis  22:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Try this: "21:35, 15 July 2007 (hist) (diff) Image:Mating whitetails w shadows.jpg (Common whitetails (dragonflies) mating with extra male in pursuit.) (top)"

EinsteinsdogEinsteinsdog 22:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, it's here on Wikipedia rather than on Commons. That's a really interesting behavioral shot, but since you won't be able to see much at thumbnail size and this article is already a bit overloaded with images, I'd suggest that you do upload it on Commons (here) so that it can be added to the gallery page there.  —Cel  ithemis  22:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:Common whitetail


text:
Talk:Star Wars live-action TV series

Jedis [sic]
I don't think there should be a sic after the term Jedis because it is correct. Putting an apostrophe there would be incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.246.183.211 (talk) 02:13, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Ok I realize that Lucas used the words "Jedis" in an intervue but that is not how it is pronounced and it never was. look at all the moves, which were writen by Lucas I must remind you, it does not mater that he used the wourd "Jedis" in ONE intervew becouse the REAL pronuceation is "JEDI" 72.224.40.131 (talk) 21:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The reason the sic is there is because several people have tried to remove the "s" from the quote, saying the proper word should be "Jedi". The sic is needed because the word Lucas himself used in the interview is "Jedis" but people keep changing it to "Jedi" because they don't realize that it's the exact word Lucas used.

Cool name
They should call it "Star Wars: The Dark Times" since that's what the time period is officially called.
 * Officially by whom?80.41.111.52 (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Obi-Wan Kenobi Lol. Valcumine (talk) 17:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Off-handed comment doesn't make it official.

The Dark Times, eh? Say, not a bad subtitle. Don-Don (talk) 18:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Did he or did he not 'save' the character?
In a section it says Lucas told the creators of 'Star Wars: Republic' to save Vos...then afterwards the paragraph disagrees...so which is correct? - Sigurd
 * I removed the contradictory (and unreferenced) statement. Hotdoglives 23:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to add any information you find.
This page will be a very much developing page over the next few years. Feel free to add any facts, rumors, or anything else you find out about this series. Also post any comments or suggestions you have for the development of this, or any of the other star wars spin-off films pages here. The Wookieepedian 06:40, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Wikipedia is not the place to put rumors. Only substantiated facts from official sources should be added to the article page, and these should have their sources cited.79.66.9.194 (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

 * I think Mr Wookieepedian is refering to this talk page rather than the article. Cavie78 (talk) 15:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's still not the place for rumours. Go to the fan forums for that kind of thing.80.41.111.52 (talk) 05:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

"Supershadow" the next Director?
I read that George Lucas will direct Season 1, and "hand it off" to someone else during Seasons 2-4 (not sure what it said exactly). I think I read somewhere that a "Supershadow" will direct 2-4, and perhaps even film sequels (Episodes 7-9). Please post to User_Talk:Shultz if you have any pertinent information.
 * SuperShadow is one of the biggest liars on the net. He has made hundreds of claims since the beginning of the prequels claiming he is friends with George Lucas himself. Shadow has even contradicted himself many times. The guy seems to really enjoy lying to the star wars community. There won't be a 7, 8, or 9, either directed by Lucas or SuperShadow, just this TV series. SuperShadow is just some loser named Mickey Suttle. He is hated at the worst level by most of us fans who know the truth behind his lies. Check out Supershadow for more information on this moron. Adamwankenobi 04:28, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Why hasn't George Lucas sued this guy for libel?Cousert (talk)

B-101
Do you know of any rumors that the series might follow a character through Imperial recruitment and training?- B-101 16:16, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * No, I haven't heard these rumors, but I'll add them to the list. At this early stage, any rumors are good rumors, and fair game, with the way Lucas and crew change their minds! Adamwankenobi 21:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

You could potentially have Biggs Darklighter's recruitment, training, and ship-jumping. I mean, that happened JUST before episode IV. In fact, in the novelization and comic book, Biggs meets Luke and tells him all about it before Luke leaves Tatooine. Pumeleon 23:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC) The only problem with this rumor is just that its a rumor. Any rumors about the show should not be included in the article, But thats just my opinon. Cinco555 17:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

"Exaggerating just a little?"
100 episodes? How could there be 100 episodes?It would cost a fortune and not even george lucas I think could pay for that.
 * Actually, this has been confirmed by Rick McCallum to be that long. The effects and money spent of course won't be nearly as much as with the films. So, yes 100 episodes is realistic. Adamwankenobi 21:09, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, ok but wouldn't that take years to make,a lot of years.
 * The show is supposedly going to last four seasons, 25 episodes per season. It would be made similar to Battlestar Galactica or Enterprise or something. It would use the technology that show uses and techniques. Lucas even claims he's going to film it using consumer-level cameras, so, yeah, it could probably be made in a short time with a lower budget, like all the other major sci-fi shows. Adamwankenobi 16:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Okay, we need a source for this or I am removing the 100 episodes. The show hasn't even started to be made yet so there is no guarantee that it will run for this long. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and is for facts, not speculations. Ben W Bell 08:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

 * The source is linked to in the external links. Rick McCallum, the show's producer, said at the ROTS DVD press event that George envisions "somewhere around 100 hours between episode three and four." The Wookieepedian 09:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

 * What is actually said is

"He envisions somewhere like 100 hours between Episode III and Episode IV with a lot of characters that we haven't met but have been developed in other novels and other things," McCallum said.

This doesn't actually mean the series will for definite be 100 episodes long. It may only run for a 24 episode series, it may run for four series, you cannot predict that and put it as fact in an encyclopaedia. I'm amending the page to reflect this. Ben W Bell 10:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Separating fact from fiction
Do not add rumors or speculation to this page without including a source. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Coffee 20:06, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * See the policy page No original research. If the facts, opinions, or arguments you want to include have not been published already by a credible or reputable publication, you're engaged in original research. If you want to include these rumors, they should be backed up by a source to give them some credibility. If these are rumors started by 13 year-olds on message boards, then they do not belong on Wikipedia. Coffee 20:57, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Also see WP:NOT: "Articles that present extrapolation, speculation, and "future history" are original research and therefore inappropriate. Of course, we do and should have articles about notable artistic works, essays, or credible research that embody predictions." If these rumors are found "all over the internet", provide just one credible source if you include them. Coffee 21:02, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Again, please do not put baseless speculation in this article. Taken direcly fron WP:NOT: "Articles that present extrapolation, speculation, and "future history" are original research and therefore inappropriate." Coffee 18:33, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

No shes dead....I SAID SHES DEAD!!!!
Ayla Secura is dead she will not return,it is rumored the actor will return but definently dead. Lucas would never do this. How would the scene open after bieng shot to the ground 27-33 times Ayla rises "what the hell just happened"?!..........no, if shes alive then so is Mace Windu, Kit Fisto and Zett! -Anonymous
 * You don't know that. If you'll remember, in ROTS, as she was being shot, the camera went behind a huge leaf. This leaves it open. Adamwankenobi 08:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't be silly, Adam. She's dead. Coffee 18:35, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Wait until Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith --- DVD Special Edition comes out :-) -Anonymous
 * You know, it really wouldn't surprise me. He would do it just to cater to the fans, and for the $$$$. The Wookieepedian 01:08, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I suppose none of you have heard of a little storytelling device known as a flashback...

disengager 03:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Possibly... The Wookieepedian 20:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Guys, chill out! Lets hope Aayla has a sister who is AT LEAST as attractive as Aayla herself was. Fanmail George Lucas today. Millions will be glad you did. --Shultz 01:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

 * The three most attractive SW girls: Padme, Young Beru, and Aayla! The Wookieepedian 03:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

to the dude up there they shot her like 20- 30 times how about i shoot you 20-30 times and see if a pan behind a leaf saves you !!!

Is there any truth to the TheForce.net rumor?
What is this about a post-Episode 6 TV series being filmed, with an aging Luke Skywalker? This show is confirmed as being in between Episodes 3 and 4. And production won't start for a while either. I think the TheForce.net article is total BS. I say it should be removed. --Hotdoglives 06:47, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * That's the great thing about it. We can put it in the article saying that it is a fact that TF.N reported it, but not that the actual rumor is true. I feel that anything reported by TF.N is notable, isnce they are one of the most trustedfan sites out there. The Wookieepedian 06:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I removed the rumor, as in the end, I was a little uncomfortable reporting something unofficial like that. I've now removed ALL non-official reports from the article. The Wookieepedian 10:44, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

One Victory
According to the official Chronology, the alliance won several battle before a New Hope. But only small victories, not major ones. I think this entry should edited to show that.

 * OK. But where is the source for this? The Wookieepedian 20:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

 * Well, the opening paragraph of Star Wars IV: A New Hope reads...

It is a period of civil war. Rebel spaceships, striking from a hidden base, have won their first victory against the evil Galactic Empire.

Now, we can interpret what "Rebel spaceships, striking from a hidden base, have won their first victory..." means in several ways. First, this could be the first victory of Rebel spaceships - i.e., those officially belonging to the new "Rebel Alliance" which is a formal body distinct from any old rebellious spaceships previous to the official formation of the Alliance. Or, another way to interpret it could be that the rebel ships WHICH WERE attacking from this hidden rebel base have won THEIR first victory. That would mean that Rebel ships had victories prior, but this is the first victory of the rebel ships stationed out of the new hidden base. Or, of course, it could mean that a real "victory" would be something more than merely beating the ships or accomplishing missions, but something really substantial - like getting the plans to the Death Star. That's probably the best interpretation. --Daniel (talk) 04:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

What about Yoda's comments to Obi-Wan at the end of Ep. III?
He mentions that Qui-Gon has returned from "the netherworld of the force" and can teach Obi-Wan in a form of communication Yoda will teach him. This statement has no reference to the original trilogy, so it's possible we will see such training in the TV series. 06:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Thank You and why is lucas doing to the STAR WARS   just why wold he do thismathadees

what about when ob1 appears to luke on hoth and tells him to goto the degobah system. To name but a few times that dead jedi appear as ghosts and communicate !!!!!!!

 * Yoda is specifically talking about the ability to appear as a ghost after you die. This is not something Jedi normally did. Normally when a Jedi is killed they are made "One with the Force" and lose their individuality. But if they have trained themselves in this technique, then when they die, they disappear as Obi-Wan did, and can then appear as a ghost. Somehow, over the years, Darth Vader must have learned these secrets as well, which is why Anakin can appear before Luke at the end of VI alongside Yoda and Obi-Wan.  This is why Obi-Wan said, "if you strike me down I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine" and why he let himself be killed - so he could continue to assist Luke in ghost form. The fact that Qui-Gon had managed to retain some individual identity was foreshadowed in Episode II. When Anakin went nuts and killed the Tusken Raider (sand people) camp, Yoda felt a disturbance in the Force. If you listen carefully, you'll hear Qui-Gon's voice yelling, "Anakin!"--Daniel (talk) 05:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

 * So if Qui-Gon is going to be a ghost, why is it he did not disappear when he died? Also if you remember Vader didn't disappear when he died either.  He and Qui-Gon were both cremated, Only Yoda, Obi-Wan disappeared.--Subman758 (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

 * You forget, Anakin/Vader is the most powerfull Jedi whose midichlorian levels is far more than Yoda. If any Jedi had the ability of retaining his individuality then it must be Anakin, also Anakin sacrificed himself to save Luke, Obi-Wan might have seen this as his conversion back to the light and helped his spirit.--The Mercenary 73 (talk) 17:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

 * Also, I don't think Qui-Gon had fully perfected the practice. He had only just discovered it before dying, which is why he could only reach them through faint voices and meditation (and why he didn't vanish).--Daniel (talk) 20:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Bounty Hunter? Hmmm,I wonder who he means?
In the main artical under the story section in the first paragraph the following sentence exists--- "In a recent interview, when asked about the show, McCallum replied, "Think about bounty hunter, that’s all I can tell you."" I wonder who he means, did someone pull a Vader or Greivious style stunt here and bring Jango Fett back after episodeII or did McCallum mean Boba, or someone totally diffrent?

I think Boba's origin will further be delved into.

How about Kyle Katarn?

Katarn was never a bounty hunter. He was a mercenary for hire. - Dizrythmia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.88.183.103 (talk) 06:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

 * From whats been said by McCallum, Lucas and co, it should feature the likes of Bossk and Dengar. They were minor characters in the original saga and thats who's stories are said to be told.--The Mercenary 73 (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Has production started yet?
Any information will be apprecieated. Fergananim 16:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I seriously doubt that production has begun, as it has been pushed back until '09. I really don't think that it would be two years until it came out if prodution just started.  Also, it may get delayed more, as in a recent interview, Lucas said that there is possily another animated series, like the 3D one, that will come out before this.  I would deffinately say that there is a very good chance that it will be about '10 before this comes out, but please Lucas prove me wrong! Supergeeky1 08:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Anthony Daniels
It says it is confirmed that Anthony Daniels has signed on to play C3PO once more. However, I would like to point out the fact that the same site had once reported that Harrison Ford had been approached by Lucas to do another Star Wars movie. I still don't believe that it is officialy confirmed. You would think StarWars.com would be reporting this, but they have yet to say anything about it. So I wonder if this should actually be said it is confirmed. Supergeeky1 04:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Logan
At the recent FanExpo in Toronto, he denied anything about playing Boba Fett. According to him, no one's ever approached him about this, and the reference towards this point in the article doesn't say anything about Daniel being asked by Lucas; it says very clearly that George is thinking about maybe including Boba Fett. Same with Tem. They'd both love to do it, but no one's said anything to them about it. Perhaps someone should think about not making inferences from a text, because that's a pretty damn big leap to make from George's comment.. Howa0082 18:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Well the Internet Movie Database says Daniel Logan will be Boba Fett.How about that?Guess we'll have Boba Fett after all.Yay! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.215.11.160 (talk) 02:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Teaser poster
Does anyone have a copy of the Toy Fair poster that is straight-on (not at an angle)? I think it would be suitable as a temporary image for the article until we get a more permanent poster or logo. Hotdoglives 04:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you Photoshop. Any objections to the current revision? Hotdoglives 02:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed Episode Numbers?
Yeah, 400 episodes would be between 16 and 32 years of this show. Bad whoever. Very bad. *newspaper whack* Howa0082 05:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SW TV teaser.jpg
Image:SW TV teaser.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Constantly Mentioned
Okay, it's a bit annoying - it seems EVERY OTHER PARAGRAPH says "Lucas mentioned that main characters may make cameo appearences" --98.193.61.220 (talk) 03:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

"Expanded Universe" ???
Noticed in the opening paragraph that this is said to be an "expanded universe production"?! Would this not be considered canon and not EU as many of the original creative talent are returning - including creator Lucas, producer McCallum and actor Daniels... all are said to be involved according to this article. It seems to me that this falls within direct continuity of the 6 feature films and is a natural extension thereof. Much like the Star Trek TV & film series... live action motion picture content is considered canon, but other mediums, like comics, novels and video games are considered EU. Just curious. Codymr (talk) 07:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * With Star Wars, the films, along with all non-contradicting Expanded Universe materials are canon. Even though Lucas may have heavy involvement with other Star Wars projects, he has said many times in the past that although the six theatrical films are his definitive vision for Star Wars, everything else (even things he has direct involvement with) is an expansion on that. The Wookieepedian (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think this should be labeled as an "Expanded Universe production" because it suggests that we already know what will be featured in it. Lucas and McCallum have implied that it will feature bounty hunters, but if they are bounty hunters that featured in the films (such as Boba Fett), then it will not be "expanded universe" characters. EU characters are ones that have not appeared in the films, but appeared in comics and novels, etc. Nobody can say for sure what characters will feature in this series yet.79.66.43.166 (talk) 10:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If our article on the EU is to be believed, this TV series is EU because it's not one of the 6 films. Whether it's canon or not is another issue, and whether the characters are also in the films is irrelevant. Staecker (talk) 11:20, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * So Bloodlines shouldn't be considered EU because it features Boba Fett? An EU production is one that is produced outside of the six films. That's what makes this EU. It may be higher on the canon scale than other EU, but it's still EU. The Wookieepedian (talk) 19:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC) The Wookieepedian (talk) 19:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

 * Yes, but at the moment nobody knows for sure what is going to be in the TV series. Merely pointing to the Wiki article of the Star Wars EU does not constitute a precise definition. To me, EU is stuff that is not strictly canon (the original Marvel comics, Splinter Of The Minds Eye, etc) as they are things not directly created by Lucas himself, even though Lucasfilm may have accepted them to some extent. However, Lucas is directly involved in the TV series and so it will be as canon as the films (rule of thumb - if it comes from Lucas, it's canon). But this is something that people will always disagree on. It's like calling Deep Space Nine a Star Trek EU production. It's not EU - it's a spin-off. The live Star Wars TV series can certainly be labeled a "spin-off" of the Star Wars films, but to label it as EU is making an assumption about the series' content, and also what EU actually refers to. I'll tell you what though - if you can find a reliable source where Lucas himself calls this an "EU production", then by all means put it in the article. Otherwise, it's just guesswork and has no place there.79.66.119.207 (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

 * How Lucas labels things is largely irrelevant, considering his comments over the years. "Laserswords", anybody? The EU is considered as being any Star Wars media other than the movies. I think it's more important for YOU to find a source where Lucas says this is NOT an Expanded Universe thing, because so far, anything not the films is EU and that's our operating assumption here. Howa0082 (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

 * The key word there is "assumption", not fact. (And since when was this "our" operating assumption). Lucas is the creator of Star Wars and the legal rights holder to the franchise. As far as Star Wars goes, he is God and anything he creates is canon. So far, his creations are really limited to the six movies and anything outside of those six movies has been created by other people (albeit using his characters). That is "expanded universe". However the live TV series is also Lucas's creation, and therefore does not fall into the realm of "expanded universe" (any more than the prequel trilogy is EU) - it will be as canon as the films are because it's straight from Lucas himself. You cannot treat the TV series the same as you would the comics or non-film novels, because Lucas is directly involved in it. And the burden of proof would be on YOU to find a suitable citation, because I have never heard Lucas say this series would be EU. You or the people who wrote that are merely just assuming it based on your understanding of what the EU is. I haven't removed the wording from the article, but I've added a cite tag because the issue is contentious.79.66.119.207 (talk) 19:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

 * Exactly. It's Lucas's baby and if he creates it then it's strict canon and not EU. We only describe things outside of the films as EU because so far Lucas hasn't created anything outside of the films. The live TV series will be different to anything that has come before (even the two Ewok TV movies) because Lucas himself is creating it. It's not EU if it comes directly from him. And I agree the burden of proof is on the people who want to label this as an "EU production". Personally, I think the article would be better served if it is just labeled as a "spin-off from the Star Wars movies", which is far more precise AND easier for casual readers and non-fans to understand. All this "EU" business is such fanboy territory. Try to remember it's Wiki, guys...not a Star Wars fanpage.Kookoo Star (talk) 20:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Lucas also (co)wrote the Holiday Special and the Ewok movies. You seem to be making up a definition of what constitutes EU, and occasionally confusing the issue with what is and is not canon. Is there a source from Lucasfilm to suggest that EU means anything other than "outside the 6 films"? (I'm having a hard time finding a definition of EU from Lucasfilm, but both wiki- and wookie-pedia say that EU means "outside the 6". For what it's worth, this definition of EU seems entirely noncontroversial at both wikis, apart from this discussion right here.) Staecker (talk) 00:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

 * On the Official Star Wars website, they have "databanks" for each of the 6 films, another one for The Clone Wars (now an animated film and TV series itself), and one for the Expanded Universe (comics, books, etc made by other hands). This shows that just because something is not actually in the six films, it is not necessarily EU either. The Expanded Universe includes things like books and comics that are made by other hands (not Lucas) even though they were obviously given a licence to be made by Lucasfilm. When the new live-action TV series is produced, you can bet your bottom dollar there will be a separate databank for it because, like the animated Clone Wars series, it stands outside of the six films and the EU. Some people in this discussion thread seem to think that it has to fit into one or the other. It doesn't. And even though canonicity and EU aren't exactly the same thing, they are most certainly intertwined - and that's what makes it all the more contentious. Again, pointing to Wiki and Wookiepedia are not definitive sources as they are written and maintained by fans, not by Lucasfilm. (Incidentally, Lucas didn't write or co-write the Holiday Special, and has gone to great lengths to bury the vile abomination after it was first screened).79.66.74.200 (talk) 03:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

 * Star Wars is Episodes 1-6. EU is everything else, no matter if Lucas creates it or not. And EU is also canon except for the infinity series and a select few things that contradict. If they categorize things on the website, that's likely just for convenience of navigation for things with a lot of content or draw, and for marketing/highlighting/organizational purposes. --Daniel (talk) 05:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Temuera
Really, people who would swap out Jango in favor of Boba in Tem's "List of Myriad Folk He's Played" need to admire a real Mandalorian. Obvious snarkiness aside, I don't recall him playing Stormtroopers. It's been a while since I watched the recent edition of SW, so maybe he does? Howa0082 (talk) 21:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * His voice replaced the stormtrooper voices in the 2004 DVD release. Staecker (talk) 21:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Ewan McGregor
Question: The Wiki page for Ewan McGregor states that he will apear in the live action SW series. Has this been confirmed? I have heard he "expressed interest" but that is a far cry from being cast. 99.230.245.128 (talk) 06:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't believe a word GL says about this
I can recall VERY specifically back in the early 80s when a news crew uncovered strange constructs in the Arizona or New Mexico desert that looked like some sort of weird spacecraft, and they did enough research to find out that GL was filming there. The crew and GL both claimed that it was work being done on a "Horror movie with Sci-Fi elements". Not long after, we all knew what they'd built -- Skiff Barges.

George Lucas will *lie through his teeth* to hide what's coming next in any iteration of Star Wars-dom. Trust him not, for trust leads too wrongness, wrongness leads to foolishness, and foolishness leads to The Phantom Menace. Dodger (talk) 10:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Undeleted this. Don't do that crap again. This message is a relevant discussion topic about the article. I'm pointing out here that "Word of God" form George Lucas is NOT a reliable source of information as he has been consistently shown in the past to spread misinformation regarding the Star Wars franchise. He should NOT be taken at face value. Just because he says something on TV or in an interview does not mean it's true, and there's weight for the argument that it means it's NOT true, at least as regards things that are yet to be released/finished.Dodger (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relevant discussion topics seek to improve the article. How are you suggesting to improve this Wikipedia article? Are you saying that references to Lucas's statements should be removed? In that case lots of the sourced content in the article currently would have to be deleted. Since you didn't make any attempt to remove info which was sourced to Lucas, I didn't think you were really serious about this. Are you? Staecker (talk) 12:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Russell T Davies
In his book "Doctor Who: The Writers Tale", Russell T Davies mentions being contacted by someone from Lucasfilm about writing for the show. He says that he turned it down. Just thought I'd mention that incase someone felt it was relevant to the main article. For those who don't know Russell is the man responsible for bringing Doctor Who back, & is the main writer for the show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dizrythmia (talk • contribs) 12:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * As long as Russell T. Davies (the worst writer in television history) isn't involved in it, this series stands a chance of actually being good then.80.41.111.52 (talk) 05:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * He is probably the most famous British science fiction television writer working today, his wikipedia biography is 'B-Class'. I would say he is worth a mention as much as any other person who turned down working on the series and since non are mentioned in the article (nor should they be, only confirmed names should be) there should be no mention in an encyclopaedia article.
 * The most famous British sci-fi television writer working today? Out of what...a list of about 5 people? 80.41.33.226 (talk) 08:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no need to get elitist over British television, especially as we all know that it's better than American television. That said, he is one of Britain's most influential screenwriters; hell, he made Saturday nights profitable for networks again. Sceptre (talk) 21:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Research in to production techniques.
I believe that this http://philipbloom.net/2009/12/12/skywalker/ is part of the LucasFilms search for a cost effective way to make a starwars series. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.213.181.22 (talk) 11:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Is this actually going to happen? What do we do if it doesn't?
Given that it's been over five years since this series was announced, and nothing has happened; and that Lucas himself has doubted whether it's doable on the available budget; isn't it time we started to ask 'what do we do if it never happens'? Should we keep this article? Personally, I think the subject would still be notable as a failed project even if it never happens, simply because of all the coverage it's received (compare Superman Lives, for example), but others may disagree. Robofish (talk) 14:50, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

This project is Dead. Lets move on.
Lucas has the money to do this project, I'm sure that he could do it alone with the Verizon "Droid" money. This screams of failed project when it had so much promise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.234.166.174 (talk) 20:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Hill Crest's WikiLaser (Boom.) (talk) 23:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Star Wars: Underworld → Star Wars live-action TV series –

There has been some confusion about the title of this project. For a long time the project had no official name and was simply known as Star Wars live-action TV series, and such was the Wikipedia name for it. In a Januari 2012 interview producer Rick McCallum left the impression that "Star Wars: Underworld" was the working title; the Wikipedia article was renamed and the "Star Wars live-action TV series" became a redirect page. In a May 2012 interview Rick McCallum reversed or clarified his earlier statement and denied emphatically that "Underworld" is the working title. I would like to request an administrator move this article back to "Star Wars live-action TV series" and have "Star Wars: Underworld" redirect there. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 19:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 195.241.24.118 (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I almost moved closed this as moved because the IP's argument is reasonable and there hasn't been an objection, but I was unsure whther or not " " should be in parentheses. Jenks24 (talk) 19:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

 * I am the one that moved it and even I agree per the sources that it isn't official now. Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:25, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * regarding the live-action TV series question is would depend if is actually part of the title or a descriptive term for a live-action series simply called Star Wars. In the first case a parentheses should not be used but it should in the second case.--174.93.167.177 (talk) 21:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * @Jenks24: If your question relates to technical aspects of Wikipedia, I do not know the answer. As far as the actual names are concerned, I'd suggest you use the existing Star Wars: Underworld and Star Wars live-action TV series articles for guidance. --195.241.24.118 (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It is ✅. This is something that you don't need a consensus. When you have such strong sources to back it up. This article will definitely need copyediting though definitely in the lead. All of what you mentioned that are in the sources I even recommend for the article if they are not there already.  Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge into Star Wars
Since Lucas is selling the Star Wars franchise and so forth, we have yet another reason to realize that this is not going to happen? In fact if it ever were to happen, it will have nothing to do with whatever plans Lucas made back in 2005. Can we just merge this content back in the main article as something that "might have been" but never was? tahc chat 07:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * No. Disney is likely to review everything they acquired. There are going to be numerous interviews about existing projects and go and no go's will come out. If it get shut down, then the article will reflect that. rrzzrr (talk) 17:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * But this is not an existing project. It is seven year old mushy idea than nobody ever wanted to "officialy" cancle. tahc chat 18:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * With 50 scripts and substantial buzz, I am confident Disney and LucasArts will be pressed about this project in interviews. A discussion about merging this article is premature.--rrzzrr (talk) 23:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

 * The Article should not be merged. We can try to improve this article by adding more information. --  RAT  -.-   Poke it  22:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The fifty completed episodic scripts and one TV movie script, along with recent comments from Lucas and McCallum on the matter, are concrete evidence that the show has developed way beyond the idea stage, and is on indefinite hold until budget issues can be resolved. The Wookieepedian (talk) 11:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Star Wars live-action TV series


text:
Ted Wilson (mayor)

Ted Lewis Wilson (May 18, 1939 – April 11, 2024) was an American politician who served as the 30th mayor of Salt Lake City from 1976 until July 1985. He won three elections. Wilson resigned during his third term to become the director of the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah where he held an adjunct assistant professorship of Political Science.

His terms were highlighted by an election in May 1979 to change the five-member commission form of government to a mayor/council form. This initiative was the consequence of a city scandal involving the take-over of the city personnel department by the chief of police.

Other highlights of Wilson's administration included reconstruction of the Salt Lake City International Airport, re-building the city's sewage treatment plant, retooling the water system, and expanding the green space of the city's parks department. Wilson also initiated and passed the first historical and foothill preservation ordinances in the city's history. Wilson was the executive director of the Utah Rivers Council, a Utah-based environmental organization.

Early life and education
Ted Wilson was born May 18, 1939, in Salt Lake City, Utah. He attended schools in Salt Lake City, graduating from South High School in 1957 and from the University of Utah in 1964, with a Bachelor of Science degree in political science. He received a master's degree in Education from the University of Washington in 1969. In 1983, he received an honorary Doctorate of Laws from Westminster College of Salt Lake City.

Career
From 1957 to 1963, he served in the Utah Army National Guard and was activated to full-time status during the Berlin Crisis. He was an instructor at the Leysin American School, Leysin, Switzerland for one year. He also taught economics at Skyline High School, Salt Lake City, Utah for seven years. During the summer months of 1966 to 1969 he was a mountaineering park ranger in Grand Teton National Park.

He was appointed Chief of Staff to U.S. Congressman Wayne Owens (D-UT) in March 1973. In April 1975 he was appointed to direct the Department of Social Services in Salt Lake County. In November 1975 he was elected as Mayor of Salt Lake City. He served as Mayor until July 1, 1985, when he became the Director of the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah. Retiring from the Hinckley Institute in September 2003, Wilson retained status as Professor Emeritus of political science and continued to teach classes at the university. Wilson was a founder of the Exoro Co.

He ran against Orrin Hatch for the U.S. Senate in 1982. In 1988, he was the Democratic candidate for Governor of Utah. In 1991, Wilson was selected by the Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government as an institute fellow during the Autumn Semester.

Personal travel to India allowed Wilson to study and understand the Indian system of government. Wilson made ten trips to India leading university student expeditions. During those visits, he met with the Dalai Lama, and led efforts to build housing for Tibetan Refugees in Bir, a community hall in Leh, Ladakh and a school in Kotwara.

Wilson loved the sport of mountaineering and climbed routes in Utah, in the Tetons, and in other ranges including the Alps, Alaska, and the Andes. Wilson was a member of the Alpenbock Climbing Club, a group instrumental to developing climbing routes throughout the Wasatch range. Wilson established three climbing schools still in operation and was a climbing ranger in Grand Teton National Park. He guided in the Tetons for Exum Mountain Guides and owned the Jackson Hole Mountain Guides in 1970. He received the U.S. Department of the Interior Valor award for a mountain rescue on the North Face of the Grand Teton in 1967.

Wilson was married to former Salt Lake Tribune columnist Holly Mullen. From his previous marriage to Kathryn Carling, Wilson had five children. He was stepfather to Mullen's two children. He was also a grandfather to 13 grandchildren.

Wilson was actively involved on several boards, including the Friends of Alta, the Utah Governor's Energy Task Force, and served as chairman of the Utah Governor's Council on Balanced Resources. He found pleasure in activities such as bicycling, skiing, rock climbing, and backpacking with his family.

Ted Wilson died from complications from heart failure and Parkinson's disease on April 11, 2024, at the age of 84.

Awards and honors

 * National Science Foundation Fellow, University of Washington, 1968–69
 * Department of Interior, Valor Award, 1968, for Grand Teton north face rescue
 * Utah Bolivian Partners, Fern Wiser Award for Distinguished Service to Bolivian Education, 1976
 * Utah National Guard, Bronze Minuteman Award, 1979
 * Chairman, Utah Presidential Inaugural Hosting Committee for President Carter, 1977
 * Utah League of Cities and Towns Award - Outstanding Utah Elected Municipal Official, 1983
 * Honorary Doctorate of Laws, Westminster College of Salt Lake City June, 1984
 * Fellow, John F. Kennedy Institute of Politics, Harvard University, 1991
 * Pi Sigma Alpha "Professor of the Year," 1994; University of Utah Political Science Department
 * Mortar Board National Honor Society "Top Professor Award," 1996
 * Professor Emeritus, University of Utah
 * Department of Communication, University of Utah, Distinguished Service Award, 2011
 * University of Utah Emeritus Alumni Board, Merit of Honor Award, 2012

Books

 * Utah's Wasatch Front, Utah Geographic Series, 1987
 * Utah Then and Now, Westcliffe Publishers, 2000.

Press

 * Numerous articles in The Wasatch Runner and the Utah Business Review Op-Ed articles in Deseret News and Salt Lake Tribune, The Event, "Putting Together the Leadership Puzzle."
 * Weekly political column in The Enterprise, a Salt Lake City business newspaper 2000 to 2001
 * Weekly political column in The Deseret News, a Salt Lake City daily newspaper, Wilson and Webb 2000–2002.
 * Article in Utah Forum, "Professor Productivity: An Emerging Issue in America and Utah," June, 1994.

title: Ted Wilson (mayor)


text: File:GuettardasFA.png

title: File:GuettardasFA.png


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When I was a lad

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to HMS Pinafore. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 05:45, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

When I was a lad
This page merely duplicates content already at HMS Pinafore (minor commentary) and HMS Pinafore (lyrics). I would say "Transwiki to Wikisource", except that it's already there! Quuxplusone 01:14, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to HMS Pinafore. According to Deletion policy, duplicate content is not a valid reason for deletion.  JYolkowski // talk 01:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to HMS Pinafore. Dcarrano 05:00, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per JYolkowski -Harmil 15:36, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Muslim forms of Marriage

Islamic view of marriage
Whell, its not about the Islamic VIEW's on marriage.

1: In my pov, Misyar marriage has nothing to do with Islam, its a wahabi inovation that will go to hell. But thats my pov. And most shias.

However, its a MUSLIM version of marriage, since Wahabis are Muslims.

2: Its not about VIEWs, rather options. Or forms.

--Striver 01:14, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

 * Every different view is a form. Therefore there should be a large section on Islamic view of marriage about Nikkah on that page, and then smaller ones on the less important ones and they should all use Template:Main to direct to the main page.  That's how it should be done.  Forms and options are views... views created those forms and options... right?  Plus, it's putting your work on a more prominent article.  Why not? gren 01:57, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Well, actualy, i dont care all that much, as long as what i have made will remain represented in the same way, that is: All four variation come in a list, on after the other, with a short explanaion, not giving the impresion that one is better than the other.

In other words: If the list is somehow merged in to the article you propesed, with intact information.

--Striver 03:17, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

 * I haven't read what you have written fully so I don't know if I'd advocate any changes to it. I do know that the content is about Islam and marriage, and even thoug specialized it should go to that page first.  That page is the hub, and we already have a nikkah page linked from it, so we'll just have the others linked too.  Of course nikkah should be the most prominent and all.  Just make sure to have sources for the others otherwise it might be called into question. gren 21:04, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

I have assumed some things as self-evident, but ill find sources if somebody wants it. --Striver 22:19, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Muslim forms of Marriage


text:
Tecla

Tecla is a female given name. Notable people with the name include:

 * Tecla Insolia (born 2004), Italian actress and singer
 * Tecla Marinescu (born 1960), Romanian sprint canoer
 * Tecla Namachanja Wanjala (born 1962), Kenyan peace activist
 * Tecla Pettenuzzo (born 1999), Italian footballer
 * Tecla San Andres Ziga (1906–1992), Filipina senator
 * Tecla Scarano (1894–1978), Italian actress and singer
 * Tecla Tofano (1927–1995), Venezuelan artist
 * Tecla Tum, Kenyan politician
 * Tecla Vigna (died 1927), Italian-American opera singer and teacher

title: Tecla


text:
User talk:Ryanamy83

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --JYolkowski // talk 01:17, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Kitchener images
Thank you for uploading the images The copyright status of these images is unclear, so they may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image pages about the sources of these images. See Image copyright tags for a list of copyright tags that you can use. Thank you. Lupin 13:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Image:Kitchener_Downtown.jpg
 * Image:Market_Square.jpg
 * Image:Conestoga_College_Kitchener.jpg
 * Image:Kitchener_City_Hall_Chamber.jpg

Ditto for Image:Old city hall.jpg. You have indicated that you are the creator of this image. However, based on the type of image this is, this would not appear to be the case. Could you please update the image description page to reflect the source of the image. Thanks, JYolkowski // talk 01:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

And Image:K Oktoberfest.jpg. Thanks again, JYolkowski // talk 01:54, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Early Berlin.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Early Berlin.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 03:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

And your reason was...???
Regarding your recent change to the page, Edmonton, Alberta, the edit summaries are there for a reason. If you are making an obscure edit, give a reason. If it happens again, it may be considered vandalism. --Arch26 05:22, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Judging by the nature of some of the additional changes you made to other cities, I would say that you actions read like discrimination. If this is true (hopefully it is not), then you are in serious violation of Wikipedia policy. I'm not saying that you have discriminatory intentions, but if you make these changes again, without a description of why, then it should become apparent. --Arch26 05:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Arch26 05:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Bell_tower.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bell_tower.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.

Image Tagging for Image:Kitchener_map.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Kitchener_map.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 19:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Och_kitchener.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Och_kitchener.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Todusk.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Todusk.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 02:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Region of Waterloo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Region of Waterloo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. -- docking man  talk 15:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kitchener Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Kitchener Logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Cc kitchener.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ryanamy83


text:
The Jackpot

The Jackpot is a 1950 American comedy film directed by Walter Lang, with James Stewart and Barbara Hale in the lead roles. It features a young Natalie Wood.

The screenplay was based on a John McNulty article, "The Jackpot", in The New Yorker (February 19, 1949), about the true experiences of James P. Caffrey of Wakefield, Rhode Island who won $24,000 worth of merchandise on August 28, 1948, from the CBS radio quiz program, Sing It Again.

The film is mostly forgotten today, but was a successful vehicle for Stewart at the time. A radio adaptation, broadcast April 26, 1951, on NBC's Screen Directors Playhouse, received much press coverage because Stewart's co-star was Margaret Truman, making her debut as a radio actress for a fee of $2,500. She received mixed reviews, and noted that her father "enjoyed it".

Plot
Bill Lawrence, employed at a department store in the Midwestern United States, supports a wife and two teenage kids on an annual salary of $7,500. Answering a phone call, he wins $24,000 worth of merchandise from a radio quiz program and is overwhelmed by prizes which range from the useful to the absurd, including a side of beef, 7,500 cans of soup, 1,000 fruit trees, a Palomino pony, a portable swimming pool, a diamond ring, a French maid, an interior decorator and portrait painter Hilda Jones.

All is well until Lawrence is told he must sell the prizes in order to pay an income tax of $7,000. When he tries to raise the money by selling the merchandise at the department store, his boss fires him. When he tries to fence the diamond ring in Chicago, he's arrested. Complicating matters, his wife suspects him of having an affair with Greenwich Village artist Hilda. Dealing with these problems, he gets help from reporter Harry Summers, who had been writing newspaper articles about Lawrence and his winnings. Bandleader Harry James made an uncredited appearance as a radio vocalist.

Cast

 * James Stewart as William J. 'Bill' Lawrence
 * Barbara Hale as Amy Lawrence
 * James Gleason as Harry Summers
 * Fred Clark as Mr. Andrew J. Woodriff
 * Alan Mowbray as Leslie
 * Patricia Medina as Hildegarde Jonet
 * Natalie Wood as Phyllis Lawrence
 * Tommy Rettig as Tommy Lawrence
 * Robert Gist as Pete Spooner
 * Lyle Talbot as Fred Burns

Awards
Screenwriters Henry and Phoebe Ephron, the parents of future writer/director Nora Ephron, were nominated for a Writers Guild of America Award.

Home media
The film was released to DVD via the manufacture on demand (MOD) 20th Century Fox Cinema Archives on December 6, 2012.

title: The Jackpot


text:
User:Critical.solvent

Articles Created or Greatly Contributed To

 * Boi_(gender)
 * Tomboy

title: User:Critical.solvent


text:
Frölicher space

In mathematics, Frölicher spaces extend the notions of calculus and smooth manifolds. They were introduced in 1982 by the mathematician Alfred Frölicher.

Definition
A Frölicher space consists of a non-empty set X together with a subset C of Hom(R, X) called the set of smooth curves, and a subset F of Hom(X, R) called the set of smooth real functions, such that for each real function

 * f : X → R

in F and each curve

 * c : R → X

in C, the following axioms are satisfied:

 * 1) f in F if and only if for each γ in C, $f∘γ$ in C∞(R, R)
 * 2) c in C if and only if for each φ in F, $φ∘c$ in C∞(R, R)

Let A and B be two Frölicher spaces. A map

 * m : A → B

is called smooth if for each smooth curve c in CA, $m∘c$ is in CB. Furthermore, the space of all such smooth maps has itself the structure of a Frölicher space. The smooth functions on

 * C∞(A, B)

are the images of
 * $$S : F_B \times C_A \times \mathrm{C}^{\infty}(\mathbf{R}, \mathbf{R})' \to \mathrm{Mor}(\mathrm{C}^{\infty}(A, B), \mathbf{R}) : (f, c, \lambda) \mapsto S(f, c, \lambda), \quad S(f, c, \lambda)(m) := \lambda(f \circ m \circ c)$$

title: Frölicher space


text:
Nevada State Route 401

State Route 401 (SR 401) is a state highway in Pershing County, Nevada. The route, known as Rye Patch Road, serves the Rye Patch State Recreation Area.

Route description
The western terminus of Rye Patch Road is at a parking lot adjacent to a day use area on the southwestern shore of the Rye Patch Reservoir. From there, SR 401 loops around to head eastward, providing additional campground and recreation area access. The highway follows the southern edge of the reservoir and crosses the Humboldt River on Rye Patch Dam before cutting through mountains and continuing eastward. SR 401 reaches its eastern terminus at Interstate 80/U.S. Route 95, about 22 mi north-northeast of Lovelock.

History
SR 401 was added to the state highway system on July 30, 1976.

title: Nevada State Route 401


text:
Cram

Cram may refer to:
 * Cram (surname), a surname, and list of notable persons having the surname
 * Cram.com, a website for creating and sharing flashcards
 * Cram (Australian game show), a television show
 * Cram (game show), a TV game show that aired on the Game Show Network
 * Cram (game), an impartial mathematical game similar to domineering
 * Cram (software), a flashcard application for Apple devices
 * Cram Motorsport, an auto racing team based in Italy

CRAM may refer to:
 * NCR CRAM, Card Random-Access Memory, a computer memory technology developed by NCR
 * Chalcogenide RAM, Chalcogenide random access memory, a phase-change computer memory technology
 * Challenge–response authentication mechanism, a computer security procedure
 * Counter-RAM, counter-rockets, artillery and mortars, a weapons system
 * MS-CRAM, also known as Microsoft Video 1, a codec
 * CRAM diet, a cereal, rice, and milk diet
 * CRAM (file format), a compressed genome sequence alignment file

title: Cram


text:
Talk:Balloon helicopter

To whomever copyedits this
This looks like a literal translation (probably done with an online translator) of the Ballonhelikopter article. It might be easier, therefore, to translate this entry directly from the German (if, of course, you speak the language.)

Actually, it might be easiest to just rewrite the entry from scratch; balloon helicopters aren't very hard to describe. If I have the time tomorrow then maybe I'll do it myself. - Christiant 01:21, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I took a stab at cleaning it up, but I've never actually played with one of these so I might have made some mistakes. Ajnewbold 22:10, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

hi people —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.44.147.130 (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Balloon helicopter


text:
Nikah halala

Nikah halala (نکاح حلالہ), also known as tahleel marriage, is a practice in which a woman, after being divorced by triple talaq, marries another man, consummates the marriage, and gets divorced again in order to be able to remarry her former husband. Nikah means marriage and halala means to make something halal, or permissible. This form of marriage is haram (forbidden) according to the hadith of Islamic prophet Muhammad. Nikah halala is practiced by a small minority of Muslims, mainly in countries that recognise the triple talaq.

Islamic law
In classical Islamic law, a husband may divorce by simply announcing to his wife that he repudiates her (talaq). The initial declaration of talaq is a revocable repudiation (ṭalāq rajʿah) which does not terminate the marriage. The husband can revoke the divorce at any time during the waiting period ('iddah) which lasts three full menstrual cycles. Resumption of sexual relations automatically retracts the repudiation. The divorce becomes final when the waiting period expires. This is called a "minor" divorce (al-baynuna al-sughra) and the couple can remarry. If the husband repudiates his wife for the third time, it triggers a "major" divorce (al-baynuna al-kubra), after which the couple cannot remarry without an intervening consummated marriage by the wife to another man. This is known as tahlil marriage or nikah halala. Making the third pronouncement irrevocable acts as a deterrent to rash repudiations.

There are hadith indicating that entering a tahleel marriage with the intention of divorcing so that the original spouses can remarry is forbidden (haraam). Abu Dawood and Ibn Majah reported that both the first husband (muhallil) and the temporary husband (muhallil lahu) were cursed by God, and Ibn Majah calls the temporary husband "a borrowed billy-goat." Al-Hakim Nishapuri adds that marriage should be based on genuine intentions, and that in the time of Muhammad, tahleel spouses would have been considered adulterers.

UK
A BBC report found that halala is practised in certain Pakistani Muslim communities in the UK. The report uncovered many instances where women were socially and sexually exploited by local religious figures.

India
Petitions have been filed by a few Muslim women and rights organisations in the Supreme Court of India against nikah halala. Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA) is one such petitioner. BMMA is a national movement of Muslim women in India. In March 2018, the Supreme Court issued notice to the Indian government on the issue of nikah halala and polygamy. The Indian government made its stand clear in favor of criminalizing the practice of nikah halala in apex court.

The Supreme Court of India will hear the petition against nikah halala and polygamy in Muslim communities from July 20, 2018. On September 13, 2018, a Muslim woman named Shabnam Rani was attacked with acid. She was one of the petitioners against the practice of nikah halala. Islamic radicals are the main suspects. On September 18, 2018 the Supreme Court asked the government to provide adequate security to the victim.

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board is against the outlawing of Nikah Halala, though it feels that its use should be discouraged and restricted to the "rarest of rare situations."

Supreme Court lawyer and BJP leader, Ashwini Upadhyay filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court of India against Nikah Halala and polygamy as violations of fundamental right to life and liberty.

Iran
Nikah halala and triple talaq are practiced among the Kurdish Sunni community of Iran. There has been pushback from women's rights activists, lawyers and human rights activists.

In popular culture

 * 1971 Persian language Iranian film Nikah Halala (1971 film)
 * 1982 Hindi language film Nikaah (film)
 * 2015 Hindi language short film Mister Come Tomorrow
 * 2016 Pakistani Urdu language TV series Hatheli (TV series)
 * 2017 Marathi language film Halal (film)
 * 2018 Hindi language film Ram Ki Janmabhoomi
 * 2019 Hindi language film Halala

title: Nikah halala


text:
Talk:Graham Capill

Consensual sex?
I've removed the following sentence
 * Two weeks before his sentencing, Capill has sent an email to his supporters stating that the sex with one of the girls had been consensual.

Sex with a minor can never be consensual (especially not one less than 12 years old). What this statement actually says is that according to Capill, one of his victims didn't struggle or show obvious distress during the assault. Presumably the others did.-gadfium 01:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay, no problem. I've added back in the Stuff news story though as it is a source for the sentence he received. Evil Monkey∴Hello 01:25, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Speculation about future events
Removed the foll speculation from the article. I suggest it is not reinstated unless a documentary reference is included.
 * "It is speculated that since Capill was identified with the Christian Heritage Party for so long, the party's performance in the 2005 elections might suffer as a consequence of his conviction."

Nurg 00:39, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Removed link for quotes
I've removed the 'See Also' section because the solitary link to Stuff.co.nz had stopped working.

On a factually accurate term I just added
Is Graham Capill a christian? Yes.

Is he a convicted pedophile? Yes.

Then there is no reason to object to calling him a "christian pedophile".
 * I think perhaps you are trying to imply that there is a link between his Christianity and his pedophilia. This is only speculation on your part. The change you made to the article doesn't improve it at all.-gadfium 22:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Never practiced law
I'm not a lawyer nor do I have much experience in the legal field so perhaps my understanding is different from one in such a field but I find it strange that someone who was a police prosecutor would be described as having 'never practiced law'. I assume this means he has never praticed law privately but still, as a lay person I feel saying he's never practiced law is just plain odd. BTW I should add the article doesn't even mention he was qualified to practice law until it mentions he was a police prosecutor and then that he was forbidden from practicing law Nil Einne 12:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Prison wages or prison salary?
The article suggests that Capill's family were burdened due to his inability to earn income as a prisoner by practicing law. Since when is a prisoner allowed to either practice law, or earn money (other than for sewing mailbags, etc.)? Fanx (talk) 16:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

edit conflicts
There were just some odd looking edits, which appear to be edit conflicts, possibly involving a bot. Probably need to revisit this once interest in the page has died off. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Graham Capill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081014070803/http://paroleboard.govt.nz/media-and-publications/decisions/capill---graham-john---240608.html to http://www.paroleboard.govt.nz/media-and-publications/decisions/capill---graham-john---240608.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 06:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Graham Capill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stuff.co.nz/sunday-news/153650/I-have-to-forgive-my-pervert-husband
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://tvnz.co.nz/content/503200
 * Added tag to http://www.paroleboard.govt.nz/decisions-statistics-and-publications/decisions-of-public-interest/caphill_-_graham_john_-_14032011.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120114072107/http://www.paroleboard.govt.nz/decisions-statistics-and-publications/decisions-of-public-interest/capill_-_graham_john_-_08082011.html to http://www.paroleboard.govt.nz/decisions-statistics-and-publications/decisions-of-public-interest/capill_-_graham_john_-_08082011.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Graham Capill