text:
User talk:Kirkswig

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 05:35, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

Norman Pearlstine
Please try harder; there is information available on the web about this person, use it to create a proper article. Creation of throwaway useless stubs simply so you can add individuals in the media to the List of Jews might well be viewed as WP:POINT, which can get people banned. Jayjg (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

AfD
Kirkswig, you can of course respond to comments in AfD. You can also cast your own vote, even if you created the article (though it's usually good to note such involvement for full disclosure). I'd encourage you to vote as well. --Kchase02 T 06:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

List of jewish Journalists
I've removed several of the entries you added to the list of Jewish Journalists, because while they are sourced as Jewish, they are not journalists (i.e. they do not "write, edit, or, present news or news articles in newspapers and magazines and in radio and television broadcasts"). For purposes of this article, please limit your entries to people who are journalists. CEO's and Presidents of news organizations would be better presented under another article that is narrowly defined (maybe something like "list of jewish CEOs and presidents").--Isotope23 17:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

PLZ cast your vote
I wd request you to cast your vote "Keep" here..Holywarrior 12:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kirkswig


text:
User talk:Moozooh

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 05:36, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Moozooh


text:
Al Jazeera Mubasher

Al Jazeera Mubasher (AJM; الجزيرة مباشر) is a public affairs television network launched by Al Jazeera Media Network originally on April 15, 2005. As such, it is an Arabic channel based in Doha, Qatar that broadcasts conferences and other events live without editing or commentary, using subtitles when translation is needed. The channel is also sometimes referred to as Al Jazeera Live, as Mubasher is an Arabic word for Live (as in live broadcast) and Al-‘Amma is Arabic for General. The channel was formerly called just Al Jazeera Mubasher.

Al Jazeera Mubasher Al-‘Amma is the first channel of its kind in the Arab world and is similar to the U.S. channel C-SPAN and UK channel BBC Parliament. The channel also has a live stream of its broadcast on its website.

In 2014, the channel underwent a graphics upgrade as part of Al Jazeera Media Networks graphics upgrade across the company.

Launched in April 2005, Al Jazeera Mubasher is the first Middle Eastern 24-hour live news and events channel. The channel broadcasts real-time footage of global and regional events.

The channel has remote feeds and on-the-ground cameras broadcasting political gatherings, press conferences, discussions, and meetings, broadcasting the latest on political, social, cultural and economic affairs. The channel feed mainly provides live and uncut livestream.

On December 20, 2014, it was announced that Al Jazeera Media Network would coalesce both Al Jazeera Mubasher and the temporarily suspended Al Jazeera Mubasher Misr into a new combined channel called Al Jazeera Al-‘Amma (AJMG) or Al Jazeera Live General.

Egyptian channel
A similar channel called Al Jazeera Mubasher Misr (AJMM; الجزيرة مباشر مصر) similar to its original sister channel minus some commentary operated in Egypt based in Cairo from 2011 to 2014. The channel functioned similar to its main counterpart but was shut down by the Egyptian government after the removal of Mohamed Morsi due to its perceived pro-Brotherhood slant. The channel's staff were arrested but later released.

In the period from 2013 until its suspension it broadcast from Al Jazeera's Doha headquarters running video brought in through other sources such as YouTube and Reuters and press conferences taped from other news organizations in the country.

In an official statement released on December 22, 2014, by the Al Jazeera Media Network, Al Jazeera's Public Relations team stated that Al Jazeera Mubasher Misr will cease broadcasting until the situation allows for it. The move came in the wake of a restoration of ties between Qatar and Egypt during the fourth quarter of 2014. This was during a period in which Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates were applying pressure on Qatar over its relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist groups and movements. The move resulted in much of the staff of Al Jazeera Mubasher Misr being absorbed into Al Jazeera Arabic and Al Jazeera Mubasher, such as news anchors Ayman Azzam and Ahmed Taha. Ahmed Taha, who is Egyptian himself, is known to push guests on their opinions regarding Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. This has resulted in Taha having legal troubles with the Egyptian Judiciary. In May 2022, an Egyptian Court sentenced Taha to 15 years in prison in absentia for interviewing former Egyptian Presidential Candidate Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh. Al Jazeera Mubasher Al‘Amma (the regular Al Jazeera Mubasher) is transmitting on the frequencies of both Al Jazeera Mubasher and the defunct Al Jazeera Mubasher Misr. As of March 2024, Al Jazeera Mubasher Misr remains not on air.

title: Al Jazeera Mubasher


text:
Talk:Finger joint

This Joint Is Best
I have used this joint loads and would reccomend it to others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.46.8 (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Looking Good
I think this joint looks really good and not only does it's job well it makes a beutiful join aswell. --78.144.87.100 (talk) 16:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Hannah
 * Yes it can be. I have added an image that reflects that.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC).

Box joint or finger joint?
This joint looks like a box joint to me. This article seems to agree: http://www.woodworkersjournal.com/Main/Articles/Skill_Builder_Box_and_Finger_joints_6989.aspx --Davefoc (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I will add a shot article at Box joint, to complement this one. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC).

title: Talk:Finger joint


text:
User talk:Nkharrat

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 05:37, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nkharrat


text:
User talk:Gotti Babii 89

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 05:37, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gotti Babii 89


text:
User talk:The Golden Superman

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 05:38, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

Please don't edit the user pages of other editors; it is considered Vandalism. If you wish to test edit, you can use Sandbox. Thanks, Meelar (talk) 15:16, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a soapbox for you to proclaim your dislike of specific people or Internet message boards. Do not continue to vandalize Wikipedia. —Lowellian (talk) 08:36, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

Bendis Board
The Bendis Board article was VfD'd and deleted, and your replacement is not an encyclopedia article in any case. I am going to redirect it again because people looking for information on Bendis should get it; please leave the redirect in place.--DNicholls 20:43, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Links13.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Links13.jpeg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 13:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:The Golden Superman


text:
Talk:List of television stations in New Mexico

Untitled
I want to clarify the difference between "affiliate" and "satellite station." It's best with an example: station A is an affiliate of network X - X provides some programming, but A is operated by a different company. Station B is a satellite station of A - B is owned and operated by A, and simulcasts most of A's programming with some local content. Hence the change on this page. -Oddtoddnm 05:38, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

KBIM?
Is it worth mentioning KBIM on this page? It's the satellite station for KRQE based in Durango, Colorado, but it serves the Four Corners region also served by KOBF and KOFT. Come to think of it, though, that would mean we should include El Paso's television stations, which serve Las Cruces, New Mexico. Thoughts? --Oddtoddnm 02:59, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

Reorganize?
I realize this page's format is based on others', but I'm wondering if a reorganization into parts of the state is necessary. Each of the three big Albuquerque stations has satellites in the Four Corners region (KRQE's, as mentioned above, is in Durango, Colorado) and in southeastern New Mexico (Carlsbad and Roswell). KOB-TV and KOAT have satellites in southwestern New Mexico (Silver City). That means channel numbers are sometimes duplicated, as seen here in 10 and 6. The areas that both Channels 10 serve are well separated (Roswell and Silver City), as are Channels 6 (Carlsbad and Silver City).

So, for the sake of preventing confusion, I propose these headings:

 * Albuquerque/Santa Fe (the cities are close enough together that their stations serve the other city. And geography and translators allow signals to reach farther into the northeastern part of the state. Plus, for example, KASA's business side is in Santa Fe, as is their FCC license, but their transmitter and main studio are in Albuquerque.)
 * Northwestern New Mexico (or Four Corners, as the region is often referred to. This would include Farmington stations.)
 * Southwestern New Mexico (which would include Silver City)
 * Southeastern New Mexico (which would include Roswell and Carlsbad)
 * Las Cruces (it's part of El Paso's media market, so signals don't bleed too far out of Doña Ana County.

Thoughts/suggestions/votes? -Oddtoddnm 03:14, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

 * I realized after I proposed this that List of television stations in Texas is broken down by city, so I went ahead and broke New Mexico down by region like this. -Oddtoddnm 03:41, August 7, 2005 (UTC)


text: Talk:Wendell, North Carolina

title: Talk:Wendell, North Carolina


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADHD: developmental disorder or parenting

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:58, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

ADHD: developmental disorder or parenting
personal essay (see WP:NOT) --Alan Au 05:39, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOR, articles shoudn't be signed, WP:NPOV. DES 05:45, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NatusRoma 06:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research, besides someone should tell the author of this new invention called "paragraphs".   — J I P | Talk 12:40, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, for reasons already given above. --DrTorstenHenning 14:39, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research, essay, unreadable, hurts my eyes. Tempshill 18:07, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:American Splendor

Untitled
Ok I've finished the table showing the list of all AS issues. This table is important because it shows the continuity of AS despite the gaps between issues and the different publishers. I've made up some numbers for the unnumbered Dark Horse issues, and then continued the numbering to include the recent DC comics issues. So the Sep 2008 issue is actually the 39th issue of AS. There are a number of gaps in the table because i'm missing some issues. Please fill in if you know the answers! Simon Clarke (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

I made some major revisions to this article. First, I divided it into further sections - Origins, Themes, Artists, Publication History etc. In the previous version of the article all these were mixed in together in one section called Overview, and I think it's clearer my way. I've also written a bit more in each of these sections and put references in, especially on the Origins of AS. In fact, I've cleared up a lot of the lack of references. Enough to remove the box at the top saying there's not enough refs? Basically, all the info, other than the refs i've given, are from issues of the comic itself. Enough to keep this article in B-Class i hope. The other thing i'm going to do is complete the table of issues I've started. Simon Simon Clarke (talk) 04:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Maybe this should be merged w/ Harvey Pekar and redirected there. Brodo 05:39, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I was thinking the opposite -- putting the movie and the comic on the same page isn't fair, as the movie contains adaptation of multiple works of Pekar, including Our Cancer Year. --Jacqui M Schedler 02:54, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree, splitting the film from the comic makes sense as they are definitely distinct entities. Dancarney 10:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Article created, just copied all the text into a new article, but I'll wikify it. Not sure what to do with the text that remains on this page yet. --duncan 18:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

stage play
User:Pegship added a tag to the stage section, suggesting that we discuss splitting it off into another article. I'd say no - just because there's a pretty small amount of information available on those three productions, and there's unlikely to ever be any more information other than a few reviews in old newspapers. And it might be a little misleading to have an article called "American Splendor (play)" that really describes three different independently written adaptations.

Also, there was an error - the actual first production was left out. I've added it. [whoops, looks like I made an anonymous edit by mistake, but that was me] ←Hob 02:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

It makes sense to keep all topics on American Splendor together. In reality it is easier to find under one article and there is really not that much information to go through.

9/7 Revisions
This article was plainly inaccurate in some places and I changed that--Pekar was doing bio as well as autobio very early on so it's not fair to say this was outside his previous scope. I removed the parentheses around the non-Crumb artists because their contributions *WERE* important, not merely parenthical. Pekar appeared on Letterman SEVERAL times after the initial fight, so I've revised that. I've also corrected the bit that suggests he was self-published up until the last issue of the regular series (incorrect) and appended a bit about him losing thousands on his work to a sentence that suggests he was actually making some kind of calculated business move and not just losing his shirt to put out a comic. Thoughts?

Fair use rationale for Image:AmericanSplendor1.jpg
Image:AmericanSplendor1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Trivia Section
What is the logic of having a prepared box informing everyone that Trivia Sections are discouraged? Why discourage them? Why not either say yes or no? Discouraging them is a milquetoast way of straddling the fence and remaining noncommittal while whining about what other contributors are doing. Be an adult – take a stand! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.62.15 (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Hiding T 15:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Collections
It would be nice if we stated what issues the collections contained, as I have not been able to find that information anywhere. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on American Splendor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071121150143/http://www.nypress.com/19/21/books/ to http://www.nypress.com/19/21/books/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004201225/http://www.walruscomix.com/pekarinterview.html to http://www.walruscomix.com/pekarinterview.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726013253/http://www.the-review.com/news/article/3343481 to http://www.the-review.com/news/article/3343481
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915031337/http://www.landmarktheatres.com/mn/americansplendor.html to http://www.landmarktheatres.com/mn/americansplendor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:American Splendor


text:
User talk:Ceffyl

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 05:39, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ceffyl


text:
User talk:Harmony1975

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!

You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some helpful links:
 * Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages.
 * Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.
 * Meet other new users You may want to add yourself to the Wikipedia new user log.
 * Assign edits to your username from before you registered.
 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you
 * How to upload files and image copyright tags.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page! ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 05:40, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

village pump question
Hi,

I saw your post about heritage research on the village pump. See Reference Desk and post your questions there. Someone may see it who's willing to offer some help. The Village Pump page is for Wikipedia-related help. Regards - Tempshill 17:01, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Harmony1975


text:
Don's Party

Don's Party is a 1971 play by David Williamson set during the 1969 Australian federal election. The play opened on 11 August 1971 at The Pram Factory theatre in Carlton.

Plot
Don Henderson is a schoolteacher living with his wife Kath and baby son in the Melbourne suburb of Lower Plenty. On the night of the 1969 federal election Don invites a small group of friends to celebrate a predicted Australian Labor Party (ALP) election victory, much to the dismay of his wife. To the party come Mal, Don's university mentor, and his bitter wife Jenny, sex-obsessed Cooley and his latest girlfriend, nineteen-year-old Susan, Evan, a dentist, and his beautiful artist wife Kerry. Somehow, two Liberal supporters, Simon and Jody also come.

As the party wears on it becomes clear that the Labor party, which is supported by Don and most of the guests, is not winning. As a result, alcohol consumption increases, and the sniping between Don and his male friends about their failed aspirations gets uglier, as does their behaviour toward the women. Mack, a design engineer whose wife has just left him, pulls out a nude photo of her for his friends' approval. Crass womaniser Cooley pursues the available women. The disillusioned wives exchange tales of their husbands' sub-par sexual performance. By the end of the night, Don and some of his friends have begun to grasp the emptiness of their compromised lives.

The play led to a 2011 sequel, Don Parties On.

Film version
See Don's Party

title: Don's Party


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Collaboration of the Month

'' Aim: to substantially improve a medicine article each month through cooperative editing. This collaboration is part of the WikiProject Medicine project.''

Every month we will select a topic from this page to focus our efforts on. Topics may relate to medical basic sciences (anatomy, biochemistry, and so on), or clinical medicine (illnesses, surgical procedures, and so on). The project aims to improve medicine articles, and to give medicine editors an opportunity to collaborate.

Anyone can nominate and vote on articles. You don't have to be involved in the field of medicine to participate. Every opinion is valued, both for article suggestions and to help ensure that articles are not too technical. New articles will be selected at the end of each month.

How to make a nomination
Anyone is free to nominate an article/topic at any time. Nominations may be made at any time using the following steps:
 * 1) Check past successful and expired nominations to make sure your topic hasn't been recently nominated.
 * 2) Edit the list of nominations and paste the following text at the bottom:  .
 * 3) To get the attention of any talk page watchers, you can add   to the WPMED template on the article's talk page ex:

Venous thrombosis
Super common condition with multiple etiologies, including some brought about by this pandemic, yet the article would need a good update to properly reflect all this! Spyder212 (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Support

Comments

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Listed as GA a little more than seven years ago, it could probably benefit from a round of updating. This would (I hope) not be too difficult, especially if User:Doc James and/or User:Jfdwolff (the original GA nominator and reviewer) were willing to help out. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:16, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Support Comments
 * Support. Very common, important to get this right. JFW | T@lk  13:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * support - agreed. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * support -- Colin°Talk 07:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * support TylerDurden8823 (talk) 08:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Good choice. Alexbrn (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Glad to see so much interest! I'll update the templates to "run" this for June 2021. If folks prefer to start earlier, certainly feel free to do so. Looking forward to it. Ajpolino (talk) 23:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

 * I've posted a link to some review articles on the article's talk page. Maybe we could spend the next week collecting a few sources, so we're ready to go at the start of June. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ It's official. Ajpolino (talk) 03:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Metastatic breast cancer
Truly awful article with very poor treatment section, of major importance to many people

Support
 * 1) MaryMO (AR) (talk) 22:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments .

Voting
Anyone can vote for as many candidates as they would like. You don't need any special knowledge of medicine to vote. Simply edit the Support section and sign your account name. Supporting an article will be taken as a sign of your interest in helping improve the article (at least in some small way) if it is selected, but it doesn't represent a binding commitment.

This project uses approval voting, so all that matters is the number of "Supports" a topic gets. If you believe a topic is a poor choice for this project, mention your objections in the "Comments" section. At the end of each month, the article with the most votes is normally selected as the new collaboration. In the case of a tie, the article nominated first is normally selected.

To remain in consideration, articles should have at least one new vote per month. If an article fails to achieve this, it may be archived. It can be renominated after at least three months. You can see the archive of successful nominations.

Participants
List of active participants (who may occasionally receive a talk post or ping to discuss project issues):
 * 1) Doc James
 * 2) Peter Coti
 * 3) LT910001
 * 4) JFW | T@lk
 * 5) BakerStMD  T|C
 * 6) Matthew Ferguson (talk)
 * 7) --Ozzie10aaaa (talk)
 * 8) -- CFCF  🍌 (email)
 * 9) TylerDurden8823
 * 10) Tirab (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 11) Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  13:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 12) Graham Beards (talk)
 * 13) Spyder212 (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 14) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 18:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 15) MaryMO (AR) (talk) 18:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 16) JenOttawa (talk) 14:48, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Tools

 * History
 * /History — record of previous collaborations
 * /Successful nominations
 * /Expired nominations

 * Templates
 * - to nominate an article on this page.
 * has parameter MCOTM to support this project. nom for nominees, cur for the current collaboration topic, prev for previous collaborations of the month.
 * - the announcement banner at the top of this page. Feel free to leave it somewhere visible to remind you (and others) to keep up with each month's target. Substitute the template for a version where the current collaboration is fixed (e.g. to post on another editor's talk page).
 * - a userbox advertising the current collaboration of the month.
 * - a thank you template that includes the current article.

 * Project maintenance
 * contains the name of the current collaboration. Other templates use this to update.


text:
Conor Knighton

Conor Knighton (born February 1, 1981) is an American actor, host, and television producer. He is currently a correspondent for CBS Sunday Morning. In 2016, Knighton launched "On The Trail," a year-long, cross-country look at America's National Parks. The reports air every other week on CBS Sunday Morning. It was to honor the 100th anniversary of the National Park Service. Knighton has won two Daytime Emmys as part of the Sunday Morning team.

Knighton was the first person to appear on Current TV when it launched on August 1, 2005, and hosted several programs and live events for the network. He was the host and executive producer of InfoMania, Current's first half-hour show. He left the show at the end of 2010.

He has appeared, as an actor, in shows such as the Gilmore Girls. AMC tapped him to host The Movie List, a weekly countdown of popular movie trivia. In 2011, he hosted the Biography Channel show, My Viral Video. His work has been featured on E!, CNN, CNN Headline News, MTV, TV Guide Channel, Oxygen, and KNBC Los Angeles. He was a regular panelist on E!'s Chelsea Lately.

In 2012, the EW Scripps Company (one of the nation's largest independent television station owners) hired Conor to create and host a daily look at travel, finance, and consumer issues.

As a correspondent for KCET's SoCal Connected, Knighton was nominated for two Los Angeles Area Emmys and won a 2015 Los Angeles Press Club Award.

Early years
Knighton grew up in Charleston, West Virginia, and attended George Washington High School. He is a graduate of Yale University.

title: Conor Knighton


text:
List of film sequels by box-office performance

This is a list of film sequels and their performance at the box office. All grosses are given in unadjusted US dollars.

For the tables presented below, determining what constitutes a film series and where a film fits in with the series is subjective. Box Office Mojo and The Numbers list 12 Star Wars films released, including anthology films such as Rogue One (2016) and Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018) (which Box Office Mojo also groups separately), and Star Wars: The Clone Wars, but excluding films such as Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure (1984) and Ewoks: The Battle for Endor (1986). For the purpose of the tables presented here, the films of the "Skywalker saga" are considered as a separate series and are ordered based on the date of release rather than by their number (for example, Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace was the fourth film released). Similarly, the Marvel Cinematic Universe is listed on the above websites as consisting of 23 films released however, these are also listed separately as 4 Avengers films, 3 Iron Man films, 3 Captain America films, 3 Thor films and so on; for these tables, the films have similarly been treated as separate series. A similar approach has been taken to the Wizarding World series (where the films are split between the Harry Potter film series and the Fantastic Beasts film series); the X-Men film series (where there are separate film series for Wolverine and Deadpool); Star Trek (where there are separate film series for Star Trek: The Original Series, Star Trek: The Next Generation and a later reboot); and the multiple Spider-Man, Batman and Planet of the Apes film series.

Box-office improvement
While sequels usually gross less than the original, some have significantly outperformed their predecessors at the box office.

Relative improvement
These film sequels outgrossed their predecessors by at least a factor of three. The list is not adjusted for inflation.

Absolute improvement
These film sequels outgrossed their predecessors by at least $500million. The list is not adjusted for inflation.


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tweaking

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 17:00, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Tweaking
The content isn't complex enough to justify an entry (this should be a dictionary entry, not an encyclopedia entry, maybe move to the wiki dictionary project). Additionally, bad writing style and bad examples (LAME). Fbergo 05:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. DES 05:46, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I would argue that falling isn't complex, yet has an article. As for bad writing style and examples, that isn't a good argument for deletion. If you feel an article is poorly written, fix it. --Pagrashtak 06:01, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but it needs serious rewriting - Che Nuevara, the Democratic Revolutionary 06:14, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep clean up with more methamphetamine. Tweaking is SoCal slang for meth-heads. Klonimus 07:00, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reasonably common colloquial usage among computer users. Article is not very good but IMHO has considerable potential. Tweek was also the name of a controversial audiophile product that was supposed to improve the quality of contacts in switches used in audio systems. Dpbsmith (talk) 13:32, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * delete per nom, use here is slang, could be dic def. (Authors should add similar content to appropriate articles.) In current state, it's just an outline of how electronics and software are modified in the development process. Same points should be made in articles about electronics, software, and so on. Can't really have an article about the word modify or improve with the focus limited to amplifier tuning. Tweaking means a thousands different things in a thousand different disciplines. DavidH 18:47, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above arguments. …Markaci 2005-07-25 T 23:24:41 Z
 * Keep on tweaking this article until it becomes a featured candidate. —RaD Man (talk) 00:11, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or at best transwiki. Why do we give so much more slack to stupid computer-related articles as compared to stupid non-computer-related articles? Nandesuka 01:18, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but work needed. Agentsoo 10:39, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but cleanup. Common electronics term. JamesBurns 07:56, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Da Executiona

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk • contribs) 05:42, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Jimharris.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jimharris.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Da Executiona


text: Talk:List of modern remakes of Shakespeare


text:
User talk:Aeusoes1

The first vowel in Āsana
Hi, I see you are changing the IPA for many Āsana articles so that the first vowel becomes a front "a" instead of a back "ɑ".

I just wanted to check this isn't because Americans use front and Brits use back, as I think possible? We Brits do I think use the back vowel for Āsana, in which case all the IPAs were either correct if British English was in use, or inconsistent ... if that's what's happening, I see no reason to Americanise these articles (and if anything, they should be Indianised, whatever that might imply; if all these are different, perhaps the IPA would be best avoided altogether). What's your view on the matter? Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Right now I'm conforming all Sanskrit IPA transcriptions that link to Help:IPA/Sanskrit to conform to what's at that chart. If you feel like is better than, the best choice of action would be to discuss the matter at Help talk:IPA/Sanskrit.
 * If we're talking about the pronunciation of these words in English, we would want to use IPAc-en, which is pretty dialect neutral, though the use of vs  is one of the dialectal differences that we'd need to either provide two transcriptions for or have a really good reason to pick one or the other.  — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]  17:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

 * I think I understand what you're saying, but I can't see from Help:IPA/Sanskrit who might be pronouncing the Sanskrit, 2000-year-old priests being in short supply. If you're confident that it's dialect-neutral, that's clearly best. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, if we're talking about Sanskrit pronunciations, then it's only dialect neutral in that it's not English. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 01:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lhakar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lhakar check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lhakar?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Accidental Rollback
Thanks for catching that accidental rollback. Wikipedia is a pain in the ass on mobile, unfortunately. :bloodofox: (talk) 16:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. :D — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 17:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the noticeboard regarding whether Kamrupi is a modern speech without history or a old language with literature. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Dispute resolution noticeboard". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- भास्कर् Bhagawati  Speak  11:17, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you have any better suggestions for how to make progress? Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I like your idea of a topic ban, but I think it would need to be permanent. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:37, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

IPA redirects
My main motive for changing the redirects is that cross-namespace redirects are discouraged. Plus, those help pages are merely guides on what each symbol in our language-specific IPA notations means that reflect consensus more than reliable sources and don't receive the same scrutiny as the articles. And I see no incoming link to those redirects except from a few old talk pages, so I don't know what you mean by "given what links to these". (I'm also a bit confounded by the fact you reverted the "IPA chart for [language]" redirects and not the "IPA for [language]" ones. Maybe they're just the ones that were on your watchlist?) Nardog (talk) 04:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The ones I reverted were those on my watch page. I didn't dive into your contribs to do additional reverts on the off chance that you'd convince me. I think you have. People looking for the actual IPA charts should be able to find them with the hatnotes at the top of phonology pages. I'll self revert. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:18, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your revert at Help:IPA/Polish
Can you give a reason for this revert? In general, I think it is polite to at least give a hint of one's rationale in the edit summary when reverting another editor's contributions. --Lambiam 05:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I thought the rationale would be pretty clear, given that the preceding edit was a request that editors discuss including additional sounds before adding them. If you'd like to include palatalized labials, please discuss it in the talk page first. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 12:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Help:IPA/Macedonian
A user recently created Help:IPA/Macedonian. Do you think this was necessary? If so, you may want to clean up it and Help:IPA/Bulgarian and Macedonian (that is, of course, if you're up for it). Nardog (talk) 15:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems like it's warranted, since there are over 160 articles using the IPA-mk template. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:04, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't see how the transclusion count of IPA-mk has any bearing on whether we should have separate guides because the template already linked to Help:IPA/Bulgarian and Macedonian, not Help:IPA, and e.g. IPA-hi being used in a couple hundred articles doesn't warrant a split of the Hindustani guide. But we do have separate phonology articles for Bulgarian and Macedonian after all, so I just completed the split. Nardog (talk) 00:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Important notice, please read:
Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 21:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Recent edits to Merchant and other articles reveals an inconsistent pattern of editing
You can cry “nonsensical justification” as much as you like. However, the reality is that WP maintains a record of all edits which can be checked for their appropriateness and context. Your recent edit to the article, Merchant here replaced phrases such as “term that describes”(or similar) with “refers to”. This is a matter of record. In support of this edit, you quoted the policy/guideline, WP:ISAWORDFOR which states that dictionary-style introductory sentences, in the form of "X ‘’’is a term’’’ for blah, blah, blah,” and “X ‘’’refers to’’’ blah, blah, blah “ [Emphasis added]. Further, the policy suggests that editors should replace "is a term for", "is a word that means", "refers to" with the more direct "is" construction. This is also a matter of record. In the case of the article Merchant you replaced one phrase which the policy suggests should be avoided (“term that describes”, or variant) with a different phrase that the policy equally suggests should be avoided (“refers to”). A quick glance at your recent editing history shows that you have repeatedly replaced the phrase “refers to” as you did
 * here,
 * here,
 * here,
 * here,
 * here,
 * here,
 * here,
 * here,

However, in other articles you have taken the phrase “term used to describe” (or similar) and replaced it with “refers to” as you did here This inconsistent pattern of editing defies comprehension and is entirely at odds with the current policy. The policy in relation to "refers to" applies to introductory passages, not to entire articles. In spite of that, the phrase “refers to” has now become so controversial, there is a veritable army of editors out there on a ‘search and destroy’ mission replacing “refers to” wherever they find it. Some of these editors are in such haste to remove and replace the ‘offending phrase’ that they have leave grammatical and logical errors in their wake. In your haste to change the prose, you have left an error
 * here,
 * here,
 * here
 * here,
 * here,
 * here and
 * here
 * here

In the case of the Merchant article, your edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merchant&type=revision&diff=900122117&oldid=900048582 replaced “described” with “referred to” in the section entitled “In Art”. The section, which was not an introductory passage, discussed the way that changes in the socio-economic external environment led to new terms being coined to describe different types of merchants. In this context, there was no attempt to turn the article into a dictionary-like entry; rather it showed how language needs to change to keep pace with social developments. Either the original passage or your changes would have been perfectly acceptable. However, WP editors generally are much more vehemently opposed to the use of “refers to” anywhere in the article, so it just a matter of time before your changes will be reverted by a pedant.

I also note that you have gone into my edit history and made a number of reversions to my recent edits. This type of activity could be construed as WP:HOUNDING or stalking. Whatever you want to call it, it is clearly activity designed to alienate good faith editors in order to serve some personal agenda. There is already far too much of this type of hounding, which is a form of abuse, taking place on Wikipedia.

My prior experience as a past editor suggests that once an editor, such as yourself, has been challenged, the challenger inevitably becomes a victim, and there is no end to the number of punitive edits that must be imposed.A few years ago, I quit editing altogether after being hounded for more than half a year by a couple of bullies, who were content to revert entire articles (save for an intro or a conclusion) amongst other things. I see this pattern emerging here and obviously, I will be forced to quit once more. It’s a shame because I had planned a total overhaul of an article that had been tagged with “essay-like” and was ready to upload the rather substantial and well-researched amendments later this week. I also had a new article on a 19th century female calligrapher prepared and was ready to upload it to the main space in the next week or so. Now that I know you are gunning for me, clearly, I will not be able to undertake these improvements at any time in the near future.

While, no doubt, you will feel the need to respond with more disingenuous claims of “nonsensical” reversions and more punitive edits, however, please understand that I have made the decision to quit for the time being and will not be monitoring my talk page or edits after today. So, you can have the satisfaction of knowing that you have driven yet another editor off Wikipedia. Go ahead and revert away, but please consider your own advice and only revert when absolutely necessary. Thank-you. 175.32.56.121 (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the time and consideration in explaining your thought process behind the revert. I see what you mean in that, replacing describes with refers to is more in keeping with my understanding of the differences between these words (describes is more accurate with adjectives, refers to is more appropriate for everything else) less than the general point of WP:ISAWORDFOR, which is more about avoiding referring to things as terms. Thus, refers to should still be avoided inasmuch as we avoid talking about things as terms, but when we can't avoid discussing things as terms (as is the case with Merchant), refers to is the better choice.
 * I tend to link to this policy page in the edit summary when phrasing like "term used to describe" attracts me to an article, as it most closely articulates my concerns in targeting this kind of language, though I can see how it might have been confusing because there were a number of other edits beyond this, only some of which were in keeping with this policy (namely, changing the meerseniers which referred to local merchants including bakers, grocers, sellers of dairy products and stall-holders, and the koopman, which described a new, emergent class to the meerseniers which were local merchants including bakers, grocers, sellers of dairy products and stall-holders, and the koopman, which were a new, emergent class). I do this even when I am changing language outside of the lede and have found it efficiently clarifies my intentions in the limited space of an edit summary, even if the policy imperfectly encapsulates what I am doing.
 * I am not sure what error you see in this edit at Hipster (contemporary subculture), the only mistakes I see are in the edit summary, where there is a typographical error, and I should have probably linked to WP:NOTDIC instead. A better example of a mistake I made due to "haste" is in the Merchant article itself, which I have fixed.
 * As for your accusation of hounding, the irony is quite rich coming from such a methodical and antagonistic comb-through of my recent edits. I have made zero reversions of your edits outside of the Merchant article. In two instances, I made edits that piggy-backed on your own; in one instance, I cleaned up the language without removing the content and in the other, I restored unproblematic content lost from a blanket revert.
 * With such a battlefield mentality, it's no wonder you have become frustrated and disillusioned with Wikipedia. You perceive slights where there are none and find enemies among people who are nothing of the sort. If this is how you normally interact in talk pages, then it's probably for the best that you stay away from the project. Regards. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 03:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Creole edit thanks
Thanks for the "thank you" for my brief edit on Creole. I just noticed that you're a grad of USM, and thought I'd say hi and thanks for your many contributions to wikipedia. I was attending Gulf Park for the past 2 years, in the biology licensure program. SMTTT! Trumblej1986 (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * What a coincidence! — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cloud gaming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Online gaming ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Cloud_gaming check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Cloud_gaming?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Spanish phonology
Sorry, which part of MOS:HYPHEN supports this edit? The third item says "Avoid using a hyphen after a standard -ly adverb ... unless part of a larger compound." It also says "A few words ending in -ly function as both adjectives and adverbs ... Some such dual-purpose words (like early, only, northerly) are not standard -ly adverbs", but as far as I know frequently is always an adverb. You also changed word-medially back to word medially; was this intended? Nardog (talk) 01:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Taking a closer look, I see I was partially in error. It seems as though the proscription of -ly words has to do with the unambiguous adjectival nature of a number of a number of words so that, e.g. quick (adjective) and quickly (adverb) are easily distinguished and a hyphen is therefore unnecessary. In that sense, frequently-used does have a redundant hyphen. However, word medially occurs predicatively (that is, separated from the noun it modifies) and therefore our style guide indicates we should not hyphenated. So it should be "...codas occur word medially and at the ends of frequently used function words..." — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 02:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Word-medially (or word medially) is an adverb, not an adjective, and in this case modifies the verb occur so the rule about attributive vs. predicative doesn't apply. Even its adjective form is usually spelled with a hyphen, word-medial, whether it's attributive or predicative; "word" being a noun, it's closer to "hand-fed" than to "light blue" in the MoS. Nardog (talk) 03:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ahh, I see now. Well I learned something today. Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 23:57, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Involved
WP:INVOLVED requires that an admin has been engaged in the article prior to an action. I haven't. As far as I recall, I never saw that article prior to today. If someone wants to make specific requests for changes in neutral terms that are not belligerent and disrespectful of established editors, they are free to do so. That comment was none of those things. Guy (Help!) 21:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, which comment are you referring to?
 * Your rationale for closing the discussion doesn't seem to fall in line with WP:CLOSE or WP:TPG. The comments that you've placed as part of the archive template are full of misstatements. The lede has not "been hammered out over a long time". Moreover, the phrase transphobic hatred is still in the article (it was just taken out of the lede), amid talk page objection. You keep implying that Rhino was disrespectful to other editors, but I'm not seeing it. Certainly nothing they've said is as brazenly uncivil as "You may be mistaking me for someone who cares". I'm also confused as to how you can surmise that all of the objections raised are the result of bad faith, off-wiki recruitment, rather than legitimate concerns. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 21:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I believe Guy was referring to this, which clearly accused them of being involved in spite of INVOLVED and AGF. As far as the "misstatements" in Guy's summary, I think most of that is a matter of perspective. The page in question is part of the gender-related sanctions area, so we all do have to be on best behaviour when it comes to AGF, ASPERSIONS and CIVIL in general. Your edit summary linked above certainly failed that test. Newimpartial (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I see. Yes, I've been sufficiently corrected on what it means to be involved. I had taken it to mean that the editor be unbiased and impartial, which is why it was a concern to me that Guy expressed his strong opinion in favor of the status quo as his rationale for closing off the discussion, rather than administrative reasons mentioned at WP:CLOSE or WP:TPG. Your tone tells me that there is apparently an aspersion of bad faith inherent in saying someone is an involved editor, so I apologize for any offense.
 * As for the misstatements, since you haven't actually provided a perspective-based rationale for how Guy's misstatements aren't actually misstatements, I think it's going to be pretty easy to reject this argument. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 22:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" QE quite precisely D. Newimpartial (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
Sir, kindly see these violations. Thank you. Treannmust (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Occlusive terminology
an affricate is a stop. That's why we use "stop" instead of "plosive" So is a nasal. And Plosive redirects to Stop consonant, not to mention we are using "Stop" to refer to plosives exclusively in our consonant chart. I think it's about time we followed the IPA and started using the term "plosive", which is less ambiguous as it excludes nasals, affricates, ejectives, implosives, and clicks. It seems like our preference of "stop" comes from the fact in some definitions the term also excludes inaudibly released stops, but Wells, former IPA President, dismisses this idea. Thoughts? Nardog (talk) 15:30, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If we're talking about phonetics in general, yes. I think there's a bit of wiggle room when we get into language-specific phonologies, where sounds are grouped together in certain ways. It seems that scholarship allows for a bit of terminological wobbliness in phonological descriptions. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 15:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, my suggestion is to replace "Stop" with "Plosive" in IPA pulmonic consonants, move articles named "...stop(s)" to "...plosive(s)", and move Stop consonant to Plosive (possibly with some content migrating to Occlusive). I'm not advocating for a blanket change in language-specific phonologies.
 * Speaking of which, do you think our having separate articles for voiceless approximants is justified? They're never found to contrast with homorganic fricatives, and it seems some if not many phoneticians hold that a voiceless sound produced with not enough constriction to be a fricative if voiced is still a fricative and that a "voiceless approximant" would mean silence. Even Ladefoged & Maddieson (1996), who argue for making the distinction between voiceless fricatives and approximants, indicate that the view which does not posit it is the traditional one (198), and say there are cases where "it is difficult to decide whether a voiceless lateral should be described as an approximant or a fricative" (199). The IPA seems to hold the traditional view, defining $⟨ʍ⟩$ as a fricative. So the current organization of articles doesn't strike me as giving due weight. RoachPeter brought this up here seven years ago, and you seem to have been somewhat persuaded in light of what Ohala said, but the conversation seems to have petered out there. (I'm not sure if "Ohala's wording suggests that his view wasn't common", though. As far as I can see, he is only talking about how the mechanism of a voiceless fricative was hitherto not fully understood, not that such a sound would have been regarded as an approximant.) Nardog (talk) 18:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I could get behind merging the voiceless approximants with their relevant fricative pages and defining as a fricative, but we would probably want to get a discussion on that. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]  04:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I just wanted to test the water with you before taking it to the community. Nardog (talk) 15:55, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Macrothink Institute
The Macrothink Institute is a predatory publisher, and it's journals are not WP:RS. Please don't re-instate them as you did here.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, and thank you for clarifying your rationale. I hadn't heard of predatory publishers before, and I think it might be a good idea to provide clarity in your edit summaries for other editors in a similar position to understand where you're coming from and to keep your edits from looking disruptive. A link to predatory publisher would be a good start, but being explicit can also help in this regard. For the edit in question, something like

"removing citation associated with Macrothink Institute, a predatory publisher."
 * If there is a policy page or discussion that can help inquiring editors, linking to it will help keep ignorant editors such as myself from making the same error. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 03:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, I felt "predatory journal" was clear enough, but I supposed I could have linked it. As for policy/guidelines, well the real one is WP:RS, but you might be interested in this Signpost piece and WP:CITEWATCH, or User:JzG/Predatory for various cleanup efforts. It's a fairly big problem, but I've made a big dent in it these past few days. Probably removed 2500+ citations to such predatory journals and publishers in the last 4-5 days.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:40, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this is one of those situations where clear edit summaries can save you a headache later on. You're doing great work. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 15:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Korean vowel "eo"
I want to use [ə] for short "eo" like a long sound, because it sound like schwa sound in eng approximation. And sometime, I can hear a bit of [ɔ]; both short and long sound. I think you have to analyze these sounds, again. Juidzi (talk) 15:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Watch on "Help:IPA/Korean", please! Juidzi (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

In seoul accent, the vowel "eo" can hear a bit [ɔ]. But use [ɔ̟] to clear the description. Juidzi (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

This is a source, that I confirm the "eo" in seoul accent.

https://www.koreanwikiproject.com/wiki/IPA Juidzi (talk) 18:37, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

More references.

https://www.koreanwikiproject.com/wiki/%E3%85%93 Juidzi (talk) 18:39, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

@Kbb2 remove my discussion. Juidzi (talk) 18:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

But ⟨ɔ⟩ −> ⟨ɔ̟⟩ is more accuracy. Juidzi (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Reply me, please! Juidzi (talk) 07:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I've already replied to you. Take a look at WP:NOR and WP:V. If you want to update the information we have on the sound system of Korean, you'll need to do it with linguistic sources. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 15:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Diphthongs [ju] and [iu̯] in spanish
I notice that in the wikipedia in Spanish a difference is made about these two diphthongs in Spanish, but not in the wiki in English, and that even the word they use in wiki in english to represent the diphthong [ju] it is used to represent the diphthong [iu̯] in wiki in spanish. I believe that the two are the same diphthong, [ju]. I say this since I have not found a difference in my speech, I being Mexican, but it may be that, yes, just because of that I tell you that it might be convenient to estudy by us something — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unvatopensante (talk • contribs) 18:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * AFAIK, there isn't a contrast between the two. It's possible some dialects exhibit both, either as allophones or as a reflection of free variation, but I haven't seen anything about that. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 21:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

'Ad hominem' argument
You took me to task on WikiProject_Linguistics for misusing the term 'prescriptive'. It was clear from context, however, that I was using it in its normal English sense of a set of instructions that tells people (in this case phonologists) exactly what they have to do (in this case, what symbols to use), in situations where they should arguably be given discretion. Since you have no information on my background or experience, you should not have assumed that I would plausibly make that mistake; I think you were just looking for a way of attacking someone you disagree with. You should therefore withdraw your remark. Let's assume that you've done so, and leave it there. - Farnwell (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC).
 * If you're going to be so prickly as to take offense at someone correcting you with mild language like I think you're confusing terms here, then you're going to have a bad time here. You're also going to have a bad time if you continue down this line of making bad faith assumptions about my intentions. I did not make an ad hominem attack. Not even close. I'm not going to withdraw my remarks, nor am I going to let you try to intimidate me with false accusations of incivility.
 * I don't need to know your background to make my comments. Though, since you brought it up, it strikes me as very strange for someone with a background in linguistics to use prescriptive to have any other meaning than prescriptive grammar. In linguistics, the term prescriptive is so loaded that using it in any other sense (including the "normal English sense" that you talk about) is generally avoided. Take it as a warning, I suppose, that other people will also read your comments the way I have, and write your comments accordingly. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello Xevœpaŋaa! (Wikipedia)
I am a new playe- I mean user, and it's an honor to talk to an aristocrat of Xevœpaŋaa (Wikipedia). UniformMilk192 (talk) 22:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you're a good fit. :) — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 02:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

How do you become a Wiki-Fairy? UniformMilk192 (talk) 01:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It's not an official thing. Just do what is described at WikiFairy. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 14:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Ok. I have converted 2 images into text. I love it. UniformMilk192 (talk) 00:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

I'm on an alt account. My contributions keep beinɡ stomped on by Nardoɡ. I most likely can deal with this by myself. NardoɡIsMean (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't recommend using an alt account. You should only have one account. Take a look at WP:SOCK, which says you can be banned for using multiple accounts.
 * I would suggest you completely scrap your alt account, which has a username that can be construed as a personal attack (something else that is frowned upon, see WP:NPA and WP:USERNAME).
 * I would also suggest that you take a look at our talk page guidelines. If you are having trouble with a user disagreeing with you, the best idea is to discuss with them civilly in article talk pages. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 20:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

African-American English
I'm not sure what your issue is, but you need to chill out with comments like this.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 20:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Or else what? I don't take much stock in someone tone policing me when I've called them out for acting in bad faith. I stand by what I said. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 21:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Lao vowel
I'm back, and discuss about Lao vowel "ae". The phoneme use "/ɛ/" but please, go to this page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-open_front_unrounded_vowel and refer lao vowel "ae" because sound like "[æ]" in american eng. Juidzi (talk) 06:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Language: Lao ∣ dialect Word: ແບ້ IPA: “[bæ:˦˦˨]” Meaning: Goat Note: Related to "[ɛ̞]" sound. Juidzi (talk) 06:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Are you here? Juidzi (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm watching Help:IPA/Lao. Anything you say in the talk page there I can see. If you believe that $⟨æ⟩$ is a better character to represent this vowel in our transcriptions, you should say so there so that we can get a more inclusive discussion going in a relevant talk page.— Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 15:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm means about allophone. Juidzi (talk) 13:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

IPA for Hebrew
Help:IPA/Hebrew has become pretty unwieldy in the last couple of days. But I'm not sure if it should be outright reverted. Will you take a look? Nardog (talk) 02:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The best option would be to do a blanket revert and start a talk page discussion. The IPA guides are a little too high profile to experiment, especially without consensus. But there may be merit to some of the changes, so it's worth it to make the first gesture at getting a discussion going. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 05:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Afrikaans key
Not pressing you but in case ping didn't work, I would like your input at Help talk:IPA/Afrikaans. Thanks. Nardog (talk) 15:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

rollback
Good evening. I'm here to ask you the reason for your rollback in Help:IPA/Italian. The edit was correct, because the 'N' in "ma'n'giare" is phonetically a dental [n], not a palatal [ɲ]. The phoneme [ɲ] in Italian exists just in the form 'GN' and before a vowel. The 'N' before a soft 'C' or 'G' is always [n] because soft 'C's and 'G's are pronounced [tʃ] and [dʒ], not [c] and [ɟ], and the dental [t] and [d] are the first elements of the postalveolar affricates (the same goes for the alveolar affricates [ts] and [dz], both written 'Z', where the preceding 'N' is [n] too). In fact if you check any Italian IPA with containing 'NC(E/I)' or 'NG(E/I)' letters sequence you'll verify that they're all transcribed as [ntʃ] and [ndʒ], never as [ɲtʃ] and [ɲdʒ]. So, please, return the example "mangiare" in the [n] box, and possibly remove the "nasal" note number 5 form the [ɲ] box because it has nothing to do with it. Thanks for your collaboration.--Tillotal (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't use rollback. I just reverted the edit since a recent discussion at Talk:Italian phonology has made it clear that the IPA key as it was is correct. If there are articles that deviate from this, we should fix their transcriptions. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 18:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Rollback or revert, it doesn't matter, you undid a right correction. I've watched the links contained in the last discussion of that talk, nowhere I've read a single example of a palatal nasal [ɲ] preceding a postalveolar affricate [tʃ] or [dʒ]. Forgive my naivety, I've taken for granted that you understood something about phonetics, that's why I explained in detail all those things in my previous comment. The information I wrote there is fully correct, any expert in phonetics could confirm that, but if a discussion among a few users could also establish that the current president of the States is Hillary Clinton it wouldn't make it true, and since there're no sources saying that in Italian a nasal preceding a postalveolar affricate is a palatal this is just false.--Tillotal (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm detecting an untoward level of incivility here. You're apparently new, so I recommend you talk a look at WP:CIVILITY. If you have a problem with the conclusion drawn in the discussion I mentioned above, I recommend you bring it there. Attempting to insult or browbeat other editors will not work. Regards. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 22:52, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If I've been somehow incivil I apologise. I was just taken by replying and maybe I didn't realise I was overshooting. However, I'm happy for the intervention of an expert in phonetics who solved the problem, thank you for your colaboration--Tillotal (talk) 06:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Aeusoes1, have another look at Talk:Italian phonology. Admittedly the change I made was hasty. I've reverted changes to transcriptions in articles and to the footnote in the key, but I neglected to (re)move the example I had added. The IP's edit was correct. Nardog (talk) 02:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for jumping in. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 03:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

The Langfocus AAVE lecture on YouTube
User:Aeusoes1, Hi. Can I ask you why you felt it necessary to delete the "External links" entry in this article, which gave a very good overview of the subject AAVE? Just curious.Davidbena (talk) 13:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I clicked on the link to see if it was worthy of inclusion (which I suspected it would not be, per WP:YOUTUBE). But when I did so, the video wasn't available.
 * Looking closely, I am now able to see that there was an error in the link. Looking at the video, it does seem informative but I don't think that it is a good link to include, per WP:ELNO items 1 and 11. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, as you are most certainly aware, YouTube is not one of the links that should be avoided, as in many cases, the YouTube presentation is strictly educational, as this video here. If you're having problems accessing the YouTube stream, I can change the format for you. In short, this short overview of the subject is easy for laymen (like myself) to comprehend and is well-articulated, IMHO.Davidbena (talk) 22:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I've given my rationale and it looks like you're ignoring it. Not sure what you're expecting here. Read the links. My reasoning still stands. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 06:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Quotes in Semitic language
Hello Aeusoes, don't you think that single quotes when used with Semitic words, are confusing and chaotic? Haven't you already noticed that Semitic languages commonly have a pharyngeal and a glottal consonant, and they are transliterated with similar symbols, including the single quote, even initially and finally? An example is علاء /ʕalaːʔ/ 'alā' 'highness' could be rendered, appearing slanted without the first and the last consonants, alā, not to mention the discomfort caused by reading single quotes transliterating consonants and single quotes surrounding glosses. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 21:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I see what you're saying, but WP:SINGLE is quite clear on prescribing the use of single quotes for simple glosses across the project. That policy itself comes from the use of single quotes for glosses outside of Wikipedia, including works covering Semitic languages. If there's any room for confusion, something like علاء /ʕalaːʔ/ ʿalāʾ ('highness') with the gloss in parentheses and the transcription in italics should work to keep things clear. As long as things are written with correct transcription and spaces in appropriate place, there will be no unintentional italics. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]  01:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

 * The article you referred to is about a very different context, in songs, which uses double quotes. I commonly see normal single quotes used to transliterate the aforementioned consonants, and missing or hyper-corrected quotes.
 * Quoting you, that example, علاء /ʕalaːʔ/ ʿalāʾ ('highness'), isn't always applicable, as the whole line might be already inside brackets, (علاء /ʕalaːʔ/ ʿalāʾ 'highness'), making ʿalāʾ and 'highness' written next to each other. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 16:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry, that should be MOS:SINGLE.
 * A space between the '' that closes the italics and the single quote that brackets the simple gloss is all that's needed to keep things looking as intended. Again, as long as things are written correctly, there will be no unintentional italics and therefore no problem. If someone is using $⟨'⟩$ for either $⟨ʿ⟩$ or in Semitic transcriptions, then the transcriptions are incorrect and potentially confusing, so if you see those you should fix them. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]  04:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Approximant
Back in 2010, you added a short reference to "Catford (1988:161f)" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Any idea what that source was? Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 04:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've added the source that I must have intended. Good catch. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

I have a question:
Why did you revert my edit? Villanco11 (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If you're talking about this edit, it's because you replaced "Mexican bandits" with the flag of Mexico, which erroneously implies that the Las Cuevas War was fought between the United States and Mexico, which it was not.
 * If you're talking about this talk page message, it's because it was both obscene and off-topic. Talk page discussions should be oriented towards improving article content, which your comment was not. To be frank, a comment like that makes you look like you've come to Wikipedia to cause trouble. If your intentions are good, I recommend you take a look at WP:TALK to make sure that you approach discussions with other editors on the best of terms. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 06:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi
Can you tell me why you reverted my changes? AleksiB 1945 (talk) 09:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * (edit): Since you know you cant pronounce [t͡ʂ] as you cant start of in the alveolar ridge and immediately jump to the retro. POA and in the page there are multiple occasions where the retro. aff. is represented with narrow transcription [t͡ʂ] AleksiB 1945 (talk) 10:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It looks like Nardog explained the rationale in this edit summary. I'm not sure what the articulatory truth is for Polish, but your phonetic claims are inaccurate. It might be more difficult if Polish retroflexes were subapical, but they are not. They are Laminal post-alveolar, which means it's pronounced with the blade of the tongue, it's not that difficult to have a closure at the alveolar ridge with the tip of the tongue and then release it with constriction in the postalveolar ridge. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 17:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

 * see 'oo' is commonly used to describe [u] and 'ee' for [i] the same with tʂ/ʈʂ i mean its not like you gota use a ton of diacritics there is a single character for it, also considering that many of the words are transcribed under narrow transcription (yes i talked to Nardog) more about it, you gota either fix on something either post alveolar (t̠͡ʃ/t͡ʃ whatever) or ʈʂ either way you cant use tʂ especially in narrow transcription (you cant immediately jump from alveolar to retroflex you gota start in pos alv or retro. t̠ʂ ʈʂ bla bla) + being hard to pronounce just depends on the speaker many langs have true retroflex stops/affricates including mine and that source is messed up once they will say that (Cz) is true retroflex and later trying to prove its pos alv kinda debated ig at the end of all this its still under the "retroflex" column

 * Why is this even a thing? I didnt add or delete something without giving a source or something like that i just changed (t) to (ʈ) AleksiB 1945 (talk) 21:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It looks like this conversation is spread out. I recommend we move this to Talk:Polish phonology or Help talk:IPA/Polish. Maybe you can explain there why it's impossible to jump from alveolar to laminal postalveolar. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 22:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * i said alveolar to retroflex, lets just move on its just some symbols AleksiB 1945 (talk) 11:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * And I said Polish retroflex consonants are laminal postalveolar. If you want to make the changes, you can try convince the people who disagree with you. Until then, you will find resistance to your desired changes. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Help_talk:IPA/Swedish
Sentence with the now redirected link is as follows: "but some of these might be pronounced as compound personal names (like the Carl Gustaf recoilless rifle) with no stress on the first". Any problems with that link are now your problem to sort out. BP OMowe (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Indian English
@: Hi, firstly i didnt added anything because there is an entire separate page for that getting into it in detail (if ur removing Indian for being empty you gotta also remove the Thai section) and there are way too much info if you start adding secondly India has the second highest population of English speakers so mentioning Hungary which has an English speaking population of <1 mil and not mentioning India which has an english speaking population ~125,344,737 is weird, "arguably not non-native anyway" idk what you mean by that, india does have native speakers of ~226,449 but vast majority of population the population speaks it as their 2nd or 3rd lang with a total pop of ~125,118,287 AleksiB 1945 (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You cant even grouping every single English accent in India as one for example North Indians mainly pronounce the /n t d/ as apical /ɳ ʈ ɖ/ (or postalveolar) and /θ ð/ as /t̪ʰ d̪ʱ/, an assamese person will pronounce both of them as laminal alveolars while a Malayali might mostly pronounce /n t d/ as subapical /ɳ ʈ ɖ/ but malayalam also has apical alveolar /n/ and /t:/ (but no single /d/ only an /nd/ cluster) so they are also used and north and central indians will pronounce [z] as /d͡ʒ/ while a malayali or a tamil guy will always pronounce them as [s] and a lot more differences.
 * (ofc some people will pronounce them like they are in English) AleksiB 1945 (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Phonological history of Spanish coronal fricatives
What was bad about my edit to merit a revert? Unfortunately, your revert edit summary did not contain criticism.--Ser be etre shi (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Your edit summary was labeled "mostly changes to formatting". Given the very first alteration apparent in the diffs was a change of 15th century to 13th century, I surmised that this misleading edit summary was a cover for the inclusion of inaccurate and even fraudulent claims with "formatting" changes that could easily mask them. Having finally given your edit a more thorough comb through, I can confirm this to be the case.
 * You'll have to pardon me if I didn't bother to give an explicit argument against such unjustified and inaccurate edits that were, themselves, not explicitly argued for; you had, for just a moment, made yourself indistinguishable from someone acting in bad faith. Regards. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 03:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

IPA/Hebrew typeface
Hey, I was wondering if you could chime in wrt the section I added. Thanks. --Gubboar (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

RfC notice
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at. Nardog (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Hindi
Hi, you [|reverted] some edits that I made. However since I do speak Hindi and I do not find mention of Hindi in your Babel, I am of the opinion that the words I provided are more accurate than what I edited out. I would like to know your reasoning why my edits are inaccurate. Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin) (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure. In English (or, at least, most dialects, including the standards spoken in the UK and US), the sound of other and the are dental fricatives. The Hindi sounds are dental stops. The words you provided are probably accurate for certain Indian English speakers, but this is non-standard and not helpful for our general readership. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the explanation. Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin) (talk) 01:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Catalan
Help:IPA/Catalan has kind of become a mess lately. I thought of intervening myself but I don't know where to begin, and I wonder if you're willing to take a stab at it. Thanks. Nardog (talk) 05:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm a little afraid, too, but I'll see what I can do. — Æµ§œš¹ <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"> [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 17:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Scottish Gaelic phonology and orthography
Hi, in February 2010 you made a series of edits to Scottish Gaelic phonology and orthography. In the course of these you added references to "Thurneysen 1980, p. ?", "Gillies (1993)", "Ternes 1980, p. ?", and "Dorian 1978, pp. 60–1", but you haven't got around to defining your sources yet. This means that nobody can look the references up, and the article is added to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could supply the missing sources, and indeed the missing page numbers, it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aeusoes1


text:
User talk:Antley

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hill Shim

The article Hill Shim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "While I understand the thinking behind creating this article, it is inherently not notable, as it is mentioned only briefly in the Book of Mormon. There are no secondary sources which one could find on this topic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rollidan (talk) 13:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Land of Antum

The article Land of Antum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "While I understand the thinking behind creating this article, it is inherently not notable, as it is mentioned only briefly in the Book of Mormon. There are no secondary sources which one could find on this topic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rollidan (talk) 13:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

title: User talk:Antley


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrus Derby

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:10, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Citrus Derby

 * Delete As of the writing of this edit, I could not find any mention of this term outside of search engine links to this article. Karmafist 05:44, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonexistant. I could not find it either. The only time I could find it was its artificial creation inside of Wikipedia. This is a comment on the "Citrus Derby." Win777 13:50, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, BS "rivalry" that doesn't exist. Gateman1997 20:23, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless proof of authenticity and notability are presented. From the only 3 google hits, two points to this article and the last one to nationmaster.com.-Poli (talk • contribs) 23:06, 2005 July 25 (UTC)
 * That just uses a Wikipedia (where this fake "rivalry" was placed) article itself. Win777 01:27, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete apparent fiction. -- Etacar11   23:55, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 08:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Fridge21736

WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeee.....

title: User talk:Fridge21736