text:
Ba Lobbo

Ba Lobbo was the nephew of Seku Amadu, the founder of the Massina Empire. He was known as an able general, and was considered as a possible successor to Seku Amadu in 1845, but was passed up in favor of the latter's son, Amadu Seku. He was also considered as possible successor to Amadu Seku in 1853, but threw his support behind Amadu Seku's son, Amadu Amadu, who became the third ruler of Massina.

In 1862, after the fall of the Empire's capital Hamdullahi to El Hadj Umar Tall's Toucouleur Empire, Amadu Amadu was captured and executed, leaving Ba Lobbo the leader of remaining Massina forces. Assembling a force of Fulas and Kountas, he succeeded in driving Umar Tall from Hamdullahi and into the cliffs of Dogon country near Bandiagara in 1864. Although Umar Tall died there in an explosion of his gunpowder reserves, his nephew Tidiani Tall succeeded him as Toucouleur emperor, and suppressed Ba Lobbo's resistance; the Massina never regained their independence as a state.

Notes and references
Citations

Sources

title: Ba Lobbo


text:
List of storms named Pilar

The name Pilar has been used for three tropical cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Ocean.

 * Tropical Storm Pilar (1987) – a weak and short-lived tropical storm that dissipated before affecting land
 * Tropical Storm Pilar (2017) – minimal tropical storm that brushed the Mexican coastline with heavy rainfall
 * Tropical Storm Pilar (2023) – moderate tropical storm that formed south of Guatemala and then moved out to sea, caused heavy rainfall in El Salvador and other parts of Central America

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: List of storms named Pilar


text:
User talk:Sven-steffen arndt

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -  BanyanTree 21:37, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

 * Hi Sven-steffen, when you see vandalism like that at Sudan, you can revert to an earlier version rather than trying to figure out what is missing. See How to revert a page to an earlier version.  Thanks,   BanyanTree 18:06, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

 * ah ... so it works! ... i always asked me how all others make reverts :-) ... thanks Sven-steffen arndt 10:33, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Sudan source material
Hello again Sven-steffen, I clicked on one of the interwiki links that you've been adding and was really impressed with the German articles you've been making for Sudanese locations. I was wondering if the source you use is also available in English? I can puzzle out some of what the German means, but an English language source would be much simpler. Thanks,  BanyanTree 17:02, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * mmh :-) ... most of them are english, so i always have to translate ... see the following web-pages:

 * www.world-gazetter.com
 * sudan embassy in oslo
 * sudan embassy in london
 * world-airport-codes for sudan
 * and also google, but don't take only the first 10 or 20, often i go till 100

 * i hope i could help you ... Sven-steffen arndt 21:55, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * and also a nice map by the UN for sudan for distances and so, see sudan.pdf Sven-steffen arndt 21:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

 * ... can you transfer the images from all english sudan-articles to the wiki-commons, there i already have created some categories and transfered all images from the german wiki ... maybe then i have the feeling that i'm not alone there :-( Sven-steffen arndt 22:14, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your links. I'll try to help moving some images to the Commons.  Cheers, BanyanTree 22:24, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

 * :-) Sven-steffen arndt 10:21, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

MODEL STUB
Why did you remove the model stub?? Lil Flip246 17:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * the article is too long to be a stub ... or isn't it? - Sven-steffen arndt 18:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello!
I write you, because, one day you write me in my user page in german, but I dont know what dou want to talk me... I think, is that I dont wrote in german pages another languague, but i`m not sure... thanks!...Bokpasa 14:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * show me a link and i will try to translate it in english ... :-) ... Sven-steffen arndt 19:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * [] here, you can see, thanks.
 * :-) ... there i said, you should write not in bad german, because nobody knows, what do you want to say - example ... my english is also not the best :( ... Sven-steffen arndt 21:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

 * ThanksBokpasa 00:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Hallo auf Deutsch neech..!
Mensch was ist das schön zu sehen, das man auch in der Englischen Wikipedia Benutzer aus Deutschland findet, die man in der Deutschen Wikipedia schon kennengelernt hat! Translation: It is nice to see a German user wich you already know in the english wikipedia! --Viele-baeren 10:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * :-) ... Gruß - Sven-steffen arndt 21:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Omdurman + Khartoum
Hi, I was wondering if, because Khartoum and Omdurman form one metropolitan area, if they shouldn't be considered together categorically, like Category:Minneapolis-St. Paul. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't someone living in Omdurman use the Khartoum airport, thus making it the de facto airport of Omdurman? --McTrixie/Mr Accountable 21:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * From looking at the map at article Omdurman, it seems as though the cities are only a few hundred meters from each other. --McTrixie/Mr Accountable 22:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * you made a rekursiv-error in Category:Omdurman and Category:Khartoum by adding them in each other ... for the articles in each Cat: you should define, what articles should be in the Cats - if all articles are in both, Category:Omdurman and Category:Khartoum, you don't need two Cats ... to the airport: if you want to travel by ship oversees from omdurman, you have to take a ship from Port Sudan, so Port Sudan also belongs to Category:Omdurman? - Sven-steffen arndt 23:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I would say that businesses like department stores, city magazines, tv and radio, grocery chains, in the area that serve both cities would be in both categories; Khartoum state agencies that serve the area; private schools and big employers with people from both cities involved. Looking at Category:Minneapolis, Minnesota, Category:Saint Paul, Minnesota and Category:Minneapolis-St. Paul, it doesn't seem like the categories have anything in common; it seems like the articles are held in common by both cities are simply placed in the big category..... I don't know what nomenclature would be used here; Category:Greater Khartoum? IDK......The people who work with the categories in Minnesota haven't put the two cities' categories on each apposite page, meaning that one has to go down to the bottom of the page to switch categories; if I ran the circus, I would simply put all three categories at the top of each category page and be done with it. ......  If one considers what has been done on the Wikipedia for the area around London, England, where every subway stop, bus line and restaurant chain etc etc has been identified, articled and categorized, one assumes that eventually the Khartoum area would eventually be as well organized someday.  I guess its very simple; 3 categories, one for each city, and one meta-category for the full metropolitan area.  Articles in common would simply be put in the big category........  And if you put Port Sudan in Category Omdurman, wouldn't it also have to be put in Category:Khartoum as well, if residents of Khartoum also go to Port Sudan to board an ocean liner?    It would have to be so, unless the big category were also there to include travel agencies and train lines etc that are involved in the Greater Khartoum cruise line business.  --McTrixie/Mr Accountable 08:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * the idea of a big Cat including Khartoum-Cat and Omdurman-Cat seems to be ok, but i also have no idea how to name this big Cat ... i never would put Port Sudan in these Cats - but maybe we have different views of what things we are using Cats for - Sven-steffen arndt 14:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Districts of Sudan
Nice maps... don't forget to number the districts to match the numbers on the maps! Rarelibra 00:53, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * :-) ... i made the maps, so someone else can sort them ... in commons i've created i nice overview-list so it is very easy to do so - cheers -- Sven-steffen arndt 00:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

More maps
Sven - would you be willing to help with more needed maps? I was working on the following: ??
 * 1) Municipalities of Zimbabwe
 * 2) Communes of Burundi
 * 3) Collines of Burundi
 * 4) Communes of Niger
 * 5) Counties of Uganda

Thanks! Rarelibra 18:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * sorry, but that was really hard work ... maybe i will create the mastermap like Image:Sudan district map.svg and you do the rest? - Sven-steffen arndt 22:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons
admins have deleted some of your pictures from commmons :-( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.115.54.54 (talk) 03:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

town of sudan
how come so many towns of sudan, which i have on my atlas, are not in wikipedia?--Sweetcorn (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

buy photo
Hi Sven,

Any chance I could purchase this photo for publication? Please send me a message if so. More information on request.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Amanitore#/media/File:Aegyptisches_Museum_Berlin_InvNr7261_20080313_Barkenuntersatz_Natakamani_Amanitore_aus_Wad_Ban_Naga_1.jpg

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epinegar (talk • contribs) 16:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sven-steffen arndt


text:
Talk:Feta

cow milk indeed
check any and I mean any greek company that makes fetacheese exaple :http://www.dodoni.eu/el/page/proion_prostateumenes_onomasias_proeleuses

and you will see that it is made from 70-75%cow milk and 25-30%sheep milk no goatmilk at all EVER we have plenty goat cheeses but if you say "your feta has goat milk in it" it is consinder a BIG insult check it with any greek imigrant or any blog you can find. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.72.81.207 (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

 * you mean sheep's milk
 * feta has nothing to do with cow's milk.it's 70%-30% (ewe-goat) or 100% ewe and also needs at least 3 months to ripen.
 * if you are not a native speaker of greek please check your dictionary and don't confuse people any more. Cow's milk makes beyaz panir, sirene(bg) and teleme (rom).teleme (lefko tyri) is also found also in greece but it's cheaper than FETA.
 * here is the site of the biggest dairy company in greece Tyras

 * http://www.tyras.gr/en/products/pdo-products/feta

 * peace — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.64.38.106 (talk) 21:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Pasteurisation
The table says "see article" concerning pasteurisation, but then the article doesn't mention if it's pasteurised. So? Maccoinnich 21:38, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

No, the true feta is not pasteurized. However, feta cheese must mature in cellars for more than 3 months to avoid the danger of disease transmission. Large Industry, though, pasteurizes the milk before using it. Apapac 14:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Storage
Historically (including, presumably, during "Homeric" times), did feta or feta-type cheese always have to be stored in liquid? Thanks ~ Dpr 02:11, 21 July 2005 (UTC) That's because such type of cheese is actually cured with salt and yeast. If you do not keep it in water it becomes too dry and salty.

 * It is not cured with yeast, only salt is used. Everything that forms on top has to be removed weekly or biweekly. As my grandmother was doing, usually cheese cloth was placed below brine surface in a wooden tub/vat ( serbian: kaca ).
 * Then it is removed, all yeast impurities formed on top are collected with cloth, washed away and sterilised. Pixius  talk 23:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Why not cow milk
While it is true that the name "Feta" is protected within the EU, Denmark is still the biggest manufacturer of Feta cheese in the world, and most - if not all - of that is produced from cow milk. The earlier revisions of the document was actually more correct than the later versions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.95.29.95 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 3 November 2005
 * It is actually inaccurate to say "goat and sheep only," since there is in fact quite a bit of cow's milk feta available. I've changed the page to reflect this. Basil Fawlty 02:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It depends partly on what you mean by "feta". According to the EU definition of feta, there is no such thing as cow's milk feta, just like there is no such thing as non-French champagne.  According to common usage, of course, both exist. --Delirium 01:46, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually Denmark is not the biggest manufacturer. Greece produces about 115000 tons per year, Danemark about 27640, France about 8000-20000 tons and Germany about 20000 and 40000 tons. Also Greece consumes 85% of the EU feta production. These are documented in the |Court of Justice of the European Communities press release 92/05, of October 25, 2005 George Schizas, 21:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

--User:apapac That some countries produce a white chhese resembling feta from cow's milk, does not mean that feta may contain cow's milk, which alters its taste.

ACCORDING TO SOME SITES SUCH AS "LONELY PLANET", FETA HAS BEEN MADE IN GREECE FOR 6,000 YEARS FROM GOAT'S/SHEEP'S MILK, AND THE SPREAD TO ASIA MINOR, THE EAST AND EUROPE SHOULD NOT BE SURPRISING THROUGH ALEXANDER THE GREAT'S INFLUENCE IN BOTH THE EAST AND EUROPE. LETS NOT FORGET GREECE HAS BEEN TRADING (CULTURE, CUISINE, LANGUAGE, LITERATURE, CHRISTIANITY) WITH ASIA, THE EAST AND EUROPE FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS.124.187.12.134 (talk) 03:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

 * Yes, anon IP, I am sure we were all in danger of forgetting Greece's historical background. Thank you for remind us - wow, that was a very close call! Duh. HammerFilmFan (talk) 13:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Turkish white cheese / beyaz peynir
I have always thought that Turkish beyaz peynir (white cheese), which is referenced in the doner kebap article, was the same as feta. Does anyone know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinawhitecotton (talk • contribs) 11:40, 16 November 2005
 * White cheese is a general name. Feta-kind of white cheese in Turkey is one of the white cheeses. There are many many kinds of white cheeses. By the way, that feta cheese was known to ancient Greeks doesn't mean that it wasn't known to other ancient peoples. So taking the ownership og feta cheese by Greeks is odd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.79.194.241 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 25 July 2006

 * I think "feta" in english simply means white cheese. Doesnt "feta" in greek mean "white cheese" too? I havent heard of greek feta being made in some specific way that differs from others, nor any of the greek feta I`ve tasted was significantly different from the variaty of white cheeses we eat in Bulgaria. Haloumi is clearly different, for example. Is feta special just because its greek? Koliokolio 21:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

 * No, "feta" in Greek means... feta and not "white cheese". Feta is not the only kind of white cheese in Greece. Other Greek white cheeses are for example anthotyros (ανθότυρος), manouri (μανούρι) and mizithra (μυζήθρα).

 * Actually, feta in Greek does not mean anything. Feta is given by Italian merchants seeing cheese being sliced and stored. This could be any white cheese Pixius  talk 23:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Then white cheese should not redirect here. denizTC 01:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

 * In Greece we usualy describe the "white cheese" as "cheese" and feta is the most common to be found. It's also not rare at all people to comfuse "feta" whith other similar white cheese if they look alike or served the same way (square fat slice with oil and oregano). This usualy happens when they travel out of Greece but it 's made clear to them once they tasted it. The same thing happens with "oil" as the word "oil" is beeing used daily to describe "extra virgin olive oil" while most people use virgin olive oil for all cooking purposes, fry an egg, potatoes, salads, mix with lemon for fish, even fix a rusty lock (up until now at least, because of the economy failure other oils are gaining ground).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vas180 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

 * That some countries produce a white cheese resembling feta from cow's milk, does not mean that feta may contain cow's milk, which alters its taste. apapac

common usage is what matters
It certainly should be mentioned in the article that the term "Feta cheese" is covered by a protected designation of origin in the EU. However, in Wikipedia common usage is what matters, not trade marks. Isn't it pointless and silly to create other aricles (like Sirene) for feta cheese not made in Greece, when it's actually the same thing? --V111P 06:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

 * If by "feta cheese not made in Greece" you mean "cheese similar to feta not made in Greece" then yes it is maybe pointless creating more than the enough information. But be warned: "sirene is not feta not even close. By personal experience there is different texture and taste so diferent cheese. As a matter of fact there actualy are different types of sirene, some of the best quality i 've taste are very close to the original feta as in smell, yet softer and they look diferent (no little holes and not so bright white).

 * Your personal experience is subjective :) . There are sirene better than feta, there are fetas better than other fetas, and I have eaten sirene far better than feta. Feta is a marketing name, nothing else and there is nothing special in feta which puts it on pedestal. If you make cheese in Dojran 5 meters from border on each side, it is going to taste the same. Then, sirene is somehow tied to whole Bulgaria, and in reality it is connected with west, south west Bulgaria, east, south east Serbia, and Macedonia. Pixius talk 14:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

country of origin
I read on igourmet.com that the country of origin of feta is not Greece, but Romania. Can anyone confirm or deny this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.91.203.5 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 19 July 2006

Being Romanian, I can tell you for sure that feta is not a traditional Romanian cheese. First time I ate feta, it was well after the communist era and it was imported (i think it was the Danish cheese brand)I remember that the high content of fat and salt hit me like a truck (not in a bad way, I do enjoy it from time to time). I am sure that feta is currently produced in Romania, but I promise you, the recipe is not indigenous. The taste of telemea is very, very different from feta, lighter, less salty, less creamy, less fatty.

 * Noone knows who is the country of origin. Probably at the time of origin countries didnt exist. Besides most countries in the Balkans (and maybe all Byzantian/Ottoman empire, because if you go to Lebanon or Syria you will find the same) share similar cuisine with only local variations and sometimes differing names. Cheese, yoghourt, burek, kebap/kofte, musaka, you name it. Some of those also spread north through cultural diffusion to Eastern and Central Europe, Ukraine or Hungary for example. Koliokolio 21:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

 * If no one knows the country of origin, why is listed as Greece in the article? I checked this article because I had a friend claim it's from Bulgaria. Cody M wilson 21:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Simple, because the specific cheese under the specific name is copyrighted by Greece. See also French_cheese. Miskin 03:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Odd. Sounds like a fait accompli on the part of Greek feta producers as producers of the same cheese in Bulgaria and Turkey are barred from using the one common name under which this type of cheese is known in most Western languages. Gdeleuze (talk) 09:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

 * This is just how it is, there are countless of products that are copyrighted by a specific country of origin, and this is a typical case with France and many cheeses variations of which exist in Belgium and Switzerland. This is not the right place to complain about the system. And btw, the Bulgars the Turks came to know this cheese via the Byzantine Greeks. 77.49.201.141 (talk) 22:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * PDO laws are very similar to trademark laws, and noone considers registering 'Pepsi' a fait accomplit. Feta became a known trade name in western countries because it was the Greeks that first started exporting it; if all producers in this country had merged into a single company they would actually have the legal right to register Feta as a standard trademark.94.67.205.169 (talk) 10:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Please provide reliable sources, if any of this "disputed" is included in the article. Unsourced changes in this article with be reverted. --Evb-wiki (talk) 22:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I think Feta consumption is highest in Turkey compared to other Balkan countries but I would give credit to Bulgaria. AverageTurkishJoe (talk) 06:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Just because it's labeled "Feta" doesn't mean it's Greek. Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova, Macedonia, Ukraine, Turkey, Iran, and several other countries in both Eastern Europe and the Middle East have the same cheese. Originally it was made from sheep's milk, however, in the later stages of industrialization cheese producers realized they can make the same cheese from cow's milk. The Greeks may have patented the name, but the arrogance and ignorance in the claim that it originates from Greece is beyond belief. To the guy that claims that the Bulgars and the Turks came to know this cheese via the Byzantine Greeks is partially right. The Bulgars (or pre-Bulgars) came from a region that is currently modern Mongolia. Prior to that, long before the Byzantine empire the Balkan region was also inhibited by other tribes such as the Trachs. Modern Bulgaria as it was founded in 681 was a result of the unification of the Trachs, Pre-Bulgars, and the Slavic tribes. The Trachs however are also commonly refered to as "Greeks" thanks to Homer (Oddysseus and Illiad) non the less. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.25.209.193 (talk) 18:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Nope. It's Greek. Historically it has been documented from Greece, and until some other ancient source says otherwise, it will remain Greek in origin. Now ... as to your wildly inaccurate statement that the BOLGARS (the origin of the "Bulgars") come from Mongolia - um, NO. The Bolgars were an offshoot of the Turkic peoples and are from central Asia and they established their home base along the Volga river. In Mongolia, all the various tribes speak Mongolic or Tungusic languages. They are not Turks.  Turks originate west of Mongolia. Try taking some college-level history courses or read some factual, non-nationalist history books. HammerFilmFan (talk) 13:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Since you insist it is of a Greek origin, can you show one historical source predating 18th century claiming it is called Feta? Pixius talk 14:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

 * I think that by seeking the origin of feta we make the mistake to seek the origin of the very "invention" of the ...recipe, as who made it first. That is missleading as people with animals made cheese since really long time ago and it's most likely "feta" recipe was common knowledge to a cheese maker as it is to milk the animal. We are probably talking for a time when the boarders belonged to kingdoms, not countries as we know them today. So it's more proper to seek either the roots of the word itself (that this leads us to ask glossology) either the population group of an area that prefared to use that kind of mixture of milks for the cheese they made and consume, that resembled the today's feta. I don't know who will define for  us the characteristics of pre-ancient's population gusto, and how acurate it might be but i am looking forward to read a work as such.
 * I personaly feel like feta's taste suits more to the mediteranean tastes and that if the court race were between Greece and say Italy it may not end Good for the Greek part even if Italy never shown interest to use feta for trade purposes. Just saying. User:vas180

The country of origin is ancient Turkey. It's very old preBC. Other countries always steal turkish foods. --2605:6000:3D10:8400:211A:8044:929B:34D1 (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

 * It's Turkish. Prehistoric.  Greeks have no history with lamb anyways.  Turks invented Yogurt.  White cheese is the nataral evolution.--2605:6000:3D10:8400:211A:8044:929B:34D1 (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Gosh, folks, I guess if enough folks insist it's true, it must be true? Do you make these claims because they're what you've always been told or do you have documentation? Largoplazo (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Origin of the word 'feta'
(feta entry as at 27 June 2008) The stated meaning of the word 'feta' as 'likely referring to the method of cutting the cheese in thin slices to serve on a plate' does not ring true to me. I don't think it is customary to slice cheese before eating in that part of the world, especially a crumbly cheese like feta. I think a more likely origin is that the slicing referred to is the slicing of the curd to release the whey, as suggested in www.american.edu/projects/mandala/TED/feta.htm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alistersharp (talk • contribs) 06:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

 * Cheese in greece has it's history but it seems that many of the greek cheese types takes their name from foreign words.

A possible origin of the word "feta" is the italian "offetta" (l'offetta > la fetta) of the latin "offa" which means "a piece or a part of something edible" (slice of bread, cheese) leaving the origin and the ingridients of the cheese solely to the cheese and it's hisdtory, but saying a lot for the way it used to be served. Sources: "The great lexicon of modern Greek language - A. Georgopapadakos" & "Lexicon of modern Greek language - G. Babiniotis" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vas180 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

 * That article is not a reliable source. Not only is it self-published, it is full of nonsense, like brine being introduced as a preservative at the end of the 19th century. --macrakis (talk) 23:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

 * Nonetheless, a citation is needed for the claim that the etymology has something to do with thin slices. It's not possible to slice feta thinly!  Dricherby (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Agreed that you can't cut feta into thin slices. However, the Italian fetta 'slice' etymology is widely accepted; I have included a link to the M-W dictionary.  I don't have Greek dictionaries with me right now, but I believe Babiniotis and Andriotis agree. --macrakis (talk) 01:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

"usually sliced in small cubes or crumbled"?
The caption to the photo of Greek salad says that feta is "... usually sliced in small cubes or crumbled." I've added a tag to that since every Greek salad I ever ate in Greece — and I lived there fore two years — was served with a slab of feta on top, which the diners would break up to eat. I've never heard of feta being served cubed in a Greek salad in Greece. Dricherby (talk) 23:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes, you're 100% correct. In fact it's quite the opposite, Feta in Greece is almost never sliced in small cubes or crumbled. I've only seen this type of preparation outside Greece. Miskin (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

What belongs in the header
We are burdening the lead paragraph with too much detail. In particular: I also find the current wording rather convoluted and confusing, which is why I simplified it. Please don't just blindly revert changes -- keep those that are improvements to the text.... --Macrakis (talk) 15:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Why mention the ECJ's decision in the header? Isn't it enough to say that since 2005, feta has been a European PDO?
 * Why mention an (incomplete) list of places in Greece where it can be produced? Isn't it enough to say that there are certain "designated" areas and go into detail in the body of the article?

 * No, it is not enough. Feta did not become a PDO just like that! It is the most adventurous PDO is Europe. And the ECJ's decision is a landmark decision not only for feta but for the PDOs as a whole and their definition in particular. Only after this decision, we got a clear picture about what is feta; about where and how it should be produced — yes! yes! Don't tell it again! Only according the European law! But it is not something unimportant; European law definitions and European definitions for PDOs, in particular, gradually get a broader importance. For instance, do you know any roquefort produced in China?! Any mozzarella produced in Japan?! Any gorgonzola produced in the Philippines?! I thus insist on the reference of the decision in the lede. After all, I do not analyze it! The legal struggle on feta between Denmark and Greece before the ECJ deserves a separate section on its own. Which I intend to write (I think about extensively working on the article during the next months). So, I honestly do not understand your insistence on NOT mentioning the ECJ decision on feta in the lede, taking into consideration its importance: it is a landmark decision, and I do not exaggerate when I use this characterization. Is it against the summary character of the lead? Why, since we speak about 3-4 words?! Isn't is useful for the reader? Doesn't it make the lede more comprehensive without prolonging it?
 * Do you want to say in the lede only that there are some designated areas in Greece? Ok, do it. I'll not revert you. But I'll still believe that it is better for the reader to know from the first paragraph of the article the exact definition of "feta". It is just 5-6 words more than what you suggest. Is it such a big difference? I believe not, but, if you still want to speak about "some designated areas" do it (and keep the suspense of the reader!). From my part, I'll still believe that this is not a comprehensive lede (have in mind that a lede must be short, but at the sime time it must stand on its own as a comprehensive summary article). And, in any case, the list is not incomplete. Feta can only be produced mainland Greece and Lesvos. Period!
 * How can you say that I blatantly revert?! It is easy for you to compare the changes in my edits since your first revert, and to see that I incorporated the "similar cheese of cow milk called feta" nonsense, although I obviously disagree with this part of the lede. I reverted without modifying my edits only once, and only after your first "blatant" revert. Anyway, I don't see why I even bother to respond to this accusation. My history in Wikipedia and my record prove that "blatant revert" are not one of my habits.--Yannismarou (talk) 21:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

And, by the way, allow me to add some sources from google books about "feta". I apologize because they are not equally reliable with thic company producing "fettttta" that you mentioned when you "blatantly" (per your definition) reverted me, but it was the best I could do. How can we compare specialized books from google books with this company located ... where?! Anyway! These are some of my humble references:
 * Anifantakis, Traditional Feta Cheese: "Over the last 20-25 years, new cheese markets have been established in the Middle East. Some European countries have exported to these countries last quantities of cheese [...] To these products the name Feta was given, although they could not be considered even as cheese according to the FAO/WHO standards in force during this period [...] From the facts given it is obvious that some countries, in order to secure more cheese exportations, give to their cheeses in brine the name Feta, although it is the name of a traditional cheese which originated and evolved in Greece."
 * Similar conclusions in Anifantakis & Moatsou Feta and other Balkan Cheeses. See also Drosinos & Sanias, p.95.
 * By a quick look in google scholar, most articles refer to the Greek "traditional feta". One article I found about the "Danish (so-called) feta" was written in 1998, namely years before the ECJ decision. This is another important parameter about the ECJ decision: When studying the relevant bibliography, we must check whether it is a pro-ECJ or after-ECJ decision source. Do the sources insist on referring to the "similar cheeses" as feta, even after the ECJ decision? For instance, White refers to "cow's milk feta", but his book was written in 2003. And is it reliable, since it is a recipee book?! Polychoniadou & Alichanidou refer to similar 'feta' cheeses, but insist that traditional feta is only the Greek one. One notices that, in most of the sources I mention, the writers are Greeks. But this is inevitable, since Greece is the country of feta, and it is normal mostly Greeks to write about it.
 * The inaccuracies of many sources is often proved by some simple examples: I saw references (περισπούδαστες αναλύσεις we say in Greek!) "Bulgarian feta". But this is no proof that feta is traditionally produced outside Greece, because the Bulgarians themselves do not call their white brined chees feta! And they never called it like that! They call it for decades (maybe more!) "sirene". And, if you go to a Bulgarian super-market, you'll find no Bulgarian feta! So, how can we rely on somebody who speaks about "Bulgarian feta", when it is clear that this person has no clue about the Bulgarian cheese market and cheese terminology? When I recently told to the Bulgarians "What is your problem with feta", they answered to me (not so honestly I am afraid!) that they have no problem with us about feta, because they do not produce feta!--Yannismarou (talk) 22:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

 * It is worthmentioning that you are now suddenly interested in the "quality" of the lede, which my reference to the ECJ spoiled (a decision taught in various European law sections of universities because of its importance), but you had no problem with some useless repetitions (the previous lede which was telling us twice that feta is used in salads), or for this paragraph:

"Feta is salted and cured in a brine solution (based on water or whey) for several months. Feta dries out rapidly when removed from the brine. Feta cheese is white [really?!], usually formed into square cakes, and can range from soft to semi-hard, with a tangy, salty flavor that can range from mild to sharp. The cured cheese easily crumbles. Its fat content can range from 30 to 60 percent; most is around 45 percent milk fat. Most feta cheese has a pH of 4.4 to 4.9."

 * THIS is not English my friends! It is one of the worst paragraphs I've seen in a Wikipedia lede. Choppy and incoherent writing of the worst kind. And, instead of dealing with these issues, you remembered the lede only when I dared to mention the ECJ landmark decision in it. Well, I honestly don't know what to do with this paragraph! I rewrote the rest of it (placing all the "similar cheese" issues in the same paragraph and not in different and unconnected paragraphs like a puzzle, which was the case previously, and mentioning the Greek salad where salads are first mentioned), and, as you can see, the lede is now already much shorter and more coherent, but I do not know what is the solution for this badly-written paragraph.--Yannismarou (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't intend to get into the middle of this, but I believe everyone could stand to reread WP:FAITH. VMS Mosaic (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Before reading anything, the easiest thing to do here is to present logical arguments and then judge them. I never questioned the good faith of anybody. What I question is the results of certain edits.--Yannismarou (talk) 10:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * FWIW, that was aimed as much at me as anyone else. I reverted you without first checking talk to see if you had taken it to the talk page per the relevant guidelines.  My initial action could have caused more conflict instead of helping resolve the dispute. In other words, I failed to accept your edit in "good faith". VMS Mosaic (talk) 21:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * And, why not to get in the middle of this? I raised a series of issues, and I want to know what other editors believe. My belief is that what I say is logical, but I may be wrong. I want to listen to different points of view, which I think is much more useful than re-reading a guideline we have all read and we thus already know.--Yannismarou (talk) 10:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

 * To the sources I mentioned above allow me to add Merriam-Webster, which is sited in the article, and gives a short and clear definition about feta, mentioning, in particular, that it is a Greek cheese.--Yannismarou (talk) 15:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Definition of feta from Larousse Illustre (2010) (sorry for ommitting les accents): "Fromage grec au lait de brebis a pate molle, affine en saumure."
 * Oxford Dictionary: "A white salty Greek cheese made from the milk of ewes or goats."
 * Le Grand Robert: "Fromage de lait de brebis, à pâte molle, fabriqué selon la recette grecque."
 * Only Britannica adopts a broader approach speaking about cow milk feta.--Yannismarou (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, my thoughts. The first paragraph contains too much detail, some of which belongs in the Certification section or in a following paragraph. The year 2005 conflicts with the year 2002 given in the Certification section and in the infobox. The first paragraph makes it sound like the decision has some effect on non-European countries like the US which will continue to produce and brand cheese with the name 'Feta', therefore the third sentence should end with something like "within the EU." The grammer of the second sentence needs reworked (e.g. "has been" would make sense if the first word was 'Since' instead of 'By'). VMS Mosaic (talk) 21:55, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, removed the reference to the ECJ so as not to contradict the relevant section, and until I rework the aforementioned section. I don't see why we should add the "within the EU", since the sentence makes clear from its begining that the definition applies according to the European Law. After all, the second paragraph about similar cheeses called 'feta' clarifies any confusions.--Yannismarou (talk) 10:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * After all, the "within the EU" is inaccurate for an additional reason: some of these cheeses are exported outside the EU; they still can't use the name 'feta'.--Yannismarou (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Feta, Sirene, Telemea, Beyaz peynir - Merger Proposal
Feta, Sirene, Telemea, Beyaz peynir - all these names refer to the same kind of white, salted cheese. Moreover, the countries in which this type of white cheese is traditional are part of one and the same cultural space. Of course there are slight variations between, say, Serbian sir and Bulgarian sirene, but variations are common to planty of other east-european dishes / types of food (for instance there are slight variations between northern-romanian sarma, southern-romanian sarma, serbian sarma, macedonian sarma and greek sarma, yet I doubt tere would be Romanians, Serbs, Macedonians and Greeks to argue that the sarma one can eat in Turkey or in Lebanon isn't really sarma). Besides, the information on the "making of" of this dairy product one can find in the pages Feta, Sirene, Telemea and Beyaz peynir is more or less redundant and the differences between these articles consist mainly in stressing on some slight variations or in "it can be eaten with eggs, salads..." and so on. That's why I think we should merge Feta, Sirene, Telemea and Beyaz peynir. Burghiu (talk) 13:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Merge I agree. There is one family of cheeses, with individual variants, some of which have PDOs.  If the master article gets long enough, there can be detail articles about the particular variants. --Macrakis (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

 * I agree with this as well, especially in light of Greece enforcing trademark protection for the brand "feta" within the EU. They may have been aiming to limit competition, but they've also removed "feta" as a generic term that can be used on sites such as wikipedia. What we need is a new generic name. "White crumbly brine cheese" just doesn't suffice. So, if feta has been removed from consideration, what other name could be used? Either the name of one of the existing similar cheeses could be used, some combination of their names could be used, or an entirely new name could be proposed. Gregconquest (talk) 04:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose These are different brands of cheese, produced in different countries. There is no real reason to merge the article, considering the general practice in Wikipedia for even similar kinds of cheese to have their own article. Kostja (talk) 08:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed that they are different 'brands'. But there needs to be a master article about the generic topic, just as there is a general cola article as well as articles on Coca-cola and Pepsi-Cola.  The common material goes in the master article; material specific to each 'brand' article (if there is enough to justify a separate article). --Macrakis (talk) 16:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Merge I agree, but I think it is imperative that the merged article title is generic, as Gregconquest said. White brine cheese seems pretty descriptive to me... Vordhosbnbg (talk) 09:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose No,just because the method of preparation is somewhat close doesn't mean that are the same cheeses so such a merger could only cause confusion.
 * (if the merger happens,then we should consider for merging other types of cheese too,for example roquefort with stilton and blue cheese) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krem12 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * There is in fact an article blue cheese that covers all blue cheeses. --Macrakis (talk) 16:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose As others have pointed out, blue cheese is a general article that covers different varieties like Roquefort or Stilton cheese. Each major variety has it's own individual article but the minor varieties are described within the general article. It would be consistent with Wikipedia standards to have a general article that contains the common information and separate articles for specifics about each significant variety. I don't think a merge is necessary, but a clean-up would be helpful such as culling articles that only have common information. --173.15.125.237 (talk) 18:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose All cheeses have a strong regional identity and group them under one section does not appear to me a good idea. Friendly Mungam (talk) 09:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Oppose If these should be merged than all hard Italian cheese should be merged too, Parmesan with Pecorino, but they're not, and this goes for all cheeses; they're all different. I agree with all the above reasons for opposing but also that these cheeses are different in common usage. If you ask for Feta in Israel and you mean Bulgarit (Sirene) cheese, you will not get Bulgarit, since they are not considered the same thing. When I first encountered Bulgarit it was explained as it's own thing and I never even thought of Feta, especially since the taste is completely different from common Feta (has the OP tasted all these cheeses?). Even if their processes and appearance, very basic qualities are similar it is too much a generalization, circumstantial, that they are the same thing, and in use these cheeses have no relationship. To merge it with Feta would be very confusing and inaccurate for someone looking for information on Sirene, ascribing qualities and a definition to the cheese that don't exist. It could also be said that this is ascribing a specifically American view of this cheese since it is labeled as "Bulgarian Feta" in my grocery store which I still find confusing. Make a list of white salted brine cheeses instead and leave it at that. As it stands the Sirene article is very clear and should remain as it is. --scazza (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge As per the points made above. Reanimated X (talk) 15:14, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose If someone wants to right a master article, then go for it, but there is enough info for specific articles for each cheese. VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose although a master article can be written. However each cheese needs to have its own article.Seleukosa (talk) 19:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose. The fact that these cheeses have similiraties does not mean that they are the same or that they are of equal encyclopedic value. Although I respect and taste Bulgarian "sirene", its fame (and its taste IMO) cannot be compared with feta's. Therefore, merging them into the same article serves what? As scazza pointed out, merging these articles would be extremely confusing for the reader, unfair for each one of these cheeses and wrong encyclopedically. If you want to make a separate "umbrella" article about white brined cheeses in the Balkans, be my guest.--Yannismarou (talk) 08:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

 * Very strong oppose. Telemea is a Protected designation of origin product of Romania and Feta is a Protected designation of origin product of Greece. European authorities recognize officially Telemea is not a Feta. So a fusion is a fault. Glavior (talk) 11:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

this logic leads us to the replacement of all cheese articles with JUST 2! -white cheese and -yellow cheese
 * Very strong oppose

it doesn't make sense.

every cheese is different -even the same batch- because a lot of factors come into play. please those who endorse the merge try to taste all the aforementioned types of cheese and you will definitely change your minds. peace — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.64.38.106 (talk) 22:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

 * Strong oppose The terms bellow refer to different types of a white cheese, that are produced differently and contain different quantity of fats. Hence, it's apparent that it's not the same cheese with different names.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

saturated fat not stated in nutrition info
that could make a big difference in health — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.108.8 (talk) 22:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Feta. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.epikouria.com/issue2/truth-lies-and-feta.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Origin
Once again the issue of the origin of Feta has come up. Anyone want to comment on the suitability of changing the article to reflect Turkish origins rather than Greek? Meters (talk) 18:39, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't see any justification for teh wholesale replacement of Greek with Turkish. The article does a good job of explaining that this is a legal term and that there are similar cheeses produced elsewhere which do not have the right to use the name "feta". We'll never know where the first feta was produced. Meters (talk) 18:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Feta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131112020710/http://www.arla.com:80/brands/Cheese/Arla-Apetina/ to http://www.arla.com/brands/Cheese/Arla-Apetina/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Turkish name
Please could you add the Turkish name as well because the beyaz peynir article was deleted it is also in the Turkish cuisine catagories

 * Please see discussion above (Turkish white cheese / beyaz peynir) where this has been discussed. Beyaz Peynir means white cheese, not specifically Feta, and if you read the second paragraph of the artricle, you will learn that this is mentioned: "However, similar white-brined cheeses (often called "white cheese" in various languages) are found in the Eastern Mediterranean and around the Black Sea". Thanks IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Feta cheese Greece / rest of EU
"Similar brined white cheeses produced in Europe are often made partly or wholly of cow's milk, and they are also sometimes called feta."

Not true. Feta is a Greek PDO cheese, you cannot call cow's milk cheese made in e. g. Denmark "Feta cheese", it's forbidden by EU regulations. In European supermarkets, Feta is 100% from Greece and 100%-80% sheep. Never cow's milk. You can call such a cheese "Greek style cheese", "white cheese", but *not* Feta. It's like Parmigiano Reggiano, Pecorino Romano, Graviera Kritis, etc. All of them PDO cheeses.151.42.70.30 (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What they are legally called, what the labels on them say, and what people call them in casual or uninformed conversation are three different things. You addressed the first, but the assertion is vague enough that it could mean the second or the third. In that case, whether or not the assertion is true, it isn't inconsistent with what you've said. Largoplazo (talk) 19:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Preservation
If appropriate references can be found, it would be helpful to add a section mentioning how long feta cheese can be kept under refrigeration before spoiling, and also whether it can be frozen and later thawed without significant loss of texture or taste. Also are there any other known methods of preservation? 72.208.150.248 (talk) 17:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It's a good thought, but it might not comply with WP:NOTGUIDE, the principle that Wikipedia isn't a user or consumer guide. If a particular preservation method or an impressive durability were especially characteristic of a particular food, then it might be noteworthy, but that's separate from a set of unremarkable details. Largoplazo (talk) 19:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Designation
My problem is with this phrase: "white cheeses produced in Europe are often made partly or wholly of cow's milk, and they are sometimes also called feta". They're not. No industry does this in Europe; no supermarket sells white cheese not produced in some particular regions of Greece as "feta"; etc. because this is forbidden by EU law, similarly to Parmigiano. In Europe, you cannot call a cheese "Parmesan". It is either Parmigiano or "yellow hard cheese". Either "feta" or "brined white cheese". I know it is difficult to understand for users of North American origin (or generally outside of Europe), but this is how it is in the EU. Some goes for many other agricultural products. Nobody in Europe calls fake Parmigiano "Parmesan", no supermarket sells fake Parmigiano as "Parmesan", nobody can produce some hard cheese and call it "Parmesan".151.42.104.52 (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If I point to a cheese and say, "Oh, I need some feta", and pick it up and put it in my basket, and it's a white brined cheese that can't be legally called "feta" for trade purposes, that doesn't alter the fact that I have just called it "feta". And I bet you that people casually call those cheese feta all the time. What people call something and what people can legally call it for trade purposes are two related but not identical things. Largoplazo (talk) 19:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree that what something is "called" vs what it is legally designated are two different things. The article is clear about the controlled designation. I have simply remnoved the "In Europe" from the lead. It is certainly true that some feta-style cheeses made outside of Europe are legally called "feta". I have some in my fridge. Meters (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * "It is certainly true that some feta-style cheeses made outside of Europe are legally called "feta"", yes, but certainly not legal in Europe. Same goes for Parmigiano (Parmesan), for instance. And no, actually not a lot of people here refer to Feta imitations (or, again, Parmesan imitations) as "feta". Anyway, my 2 proofs (and sources, after all, since Wikipedia is all about sources, you know this better than me since you're experienced users!) are (1) law and (2) what each package says (feta, white cheese, etc.). What some people could, casually, call "feta" is not of any importance here, since it cannot be sourced in any way (and, thus, challenged and removed).151.42.104.52 (talk) 19:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * And, as I clearly stated above, I removed the "In Europe" from that line, so there should no longer any problem with what we state in the lead. The talkpage is WP:NOTAFORUM. Parmesan is irrelevant to this page. If you have any other suggestions please make them, otherwise we're done. Meters (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You seem determined to keep repeating the nature of the legal status of the word "feta" without regard to the facts that (a) Meters and I already understand and acknowledge it; (b) you haven't said anything I didn't already know before this discussion; and (c) the current text in the article is completely consistent with what you are telling us and, in the second paragraph, it says the same thing. Largoplazo (talk) 20:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

According to EU law Feta is a Protected Designation of Origin Cheese thus only in certain regions if allowed its production
According to EU law Directives, Feta Cheese is only made in specific geographical regions in Greece therefore in the article must be specified the regions i Greece that produce FETA cheese, otherwise it is false to mention the whole country. I am restoring the previous edition I did in the article.Tidewings (talk) 13:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The second paragraph of the lead makes it clear that "cheeses produced in a traditional way in particular areas of Greece" (My emphasis) and that is sufficient for the lead.IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It is insufficient since all products of FETA cheese must declare their origin on the product. Hence when it is said in particular areas of Greece and the reader does not know where from he/she may be tricked into buying a product that its is not FETA. You said it is ungrammatical you either made an unwilling mistake or on purpose. The edit must remain the same I did.
 * Saying that it's made in Greece is not false - it is perhaps not a complete description, but it is simple and concise, which is what we want from the first sentence of the lead. We don't need to list all the specific regions where it can be produced at this point - particularly not in the way did, by adding a long list of the regions in the middle of a sentence. Why not write a new sentence in the section on 'certification', where the issue of the EU directives is already discussed? Girth Summit  (blether)  14:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Saying in Greece it is untrue. Furthermore from my years in the University I know first hand that students tend to visit wikipedia for anything before reading any scientific origin text. Therefore it is very important to get from the first paragraph that this type of cheese is a Protected Designation of Origin cheese and is not produced everywhere in Greece. In addition because of the dispute of the FYRoM (United nations name) or Republic of Macedonia (constitutional name) the reader must also understand the difference and not buy a product from another country. You still have not unswered my question, where is the ungrammatical part?Tidewings (talk) 14:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Then, as Girth Summit has suggested above, add a sentance to the body of the article to point out the geographical limits. The lead is supposed to be a summary of the article, not a detailed description. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * OK - on the grammar, you used a colon to introduce your list - but your list was inserted into an existing sentence, which then just carried on as if the list hadn't been there. If you're introducing a list with a colon, you would normally terminate the sentence at the end of the list, and start a new one.
 * On the point of fact, I repeat that it is not untrue to say it is made in Greece. You are, I think, arguing that it is not sufficient, which is fair enough, but you cannot say that it is untrue. I agree with IdreamofJeanie that a full list of the regions where it is made is probably excessive for the lead, and I repeat my suggestion that you write a new sentence for the body of the article, where the EU regulation stuff is already mentioned. It definitely doesn't need to go in the first sentence of the lead, which is supposed to be a concise description. Girth Summit  (blether)  14:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * And why should we follow his opinion over mine. The edition I did is accurate and leads the reader directly to understand the difference. No extra section is needed. Furthermore, Girth has failed to answer me where is the gramatical error.Tidewings (talk) 14:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The lead is a summary, not a full list of everything in the article. I agree with the others the lead should be the shorter version. VViking Talk Edits 14:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * OK. Agreed. However, how do we distinguish Macedonia in Greece over the neighboring country because it axists on the list?
 * Please read WP:BRD "Discuss the contribution, and the reasons for the contribution, on the article's talk page with the person who reverted your contribution. Don't restore your changes or engage in back-and-forth reverting." You have made 3 reverts, do not do so again. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Guys I will add a subsection with the regions but how we distinguish the region of Macedonia over FYRoM (UN) or Rep. of Macedonia (constitutional).Tidewings (talk) 14:26, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Frankly a polital naming dispute is bugger all to do with cheese. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * May I do two propositions? first I write the United nations name in the final list, or two we write the English Version UNITED NATIONS name and in Slavic version its constitutonal name?Tidewings (talk) 14:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You will want to find reliable sources and include the the naming dispute in your edit. You may wish to write the section in your own sandbox and then ask others here to have a look at it before you add it to the article. And thank you for starting to use the talk page. VViking Talk Edits 14:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Its a whole of a deal to do all the things you describe I can leave their name as it is and next to it write that there is adispute over the name and they do not produce FETa?Tidewings (talk) 14:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Guys I would like know your opinion on what I have asked. I want to make the edition because the common reader will get the wrong impression that that country produces FETA if left as it is, so I would like to see a consensus on that first?Tidewings (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Will this source suffice? https://www.thenationalherald.com/28905/skopje-not-macedonia-but-feta-is-greek/. Tidewings (talk) 15:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

You asked in your last edit summary for an answer to your question - I think you mean where you are asking about how to differentiate between the Greek region called Macedonia, and the FYRoM? If I'm honest, I don't think that we need to differentiate any further - the text as it stands says that it can only be made in certain regions of Greece, and then lists Macedonia as one of those regions. That seems pretty unambiguous there - were referring to the Greek region, not the FYRoM. Have I missed something? Girth Summit  (blether) 15:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * OKTidewings (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree that we don't need to specify the particular regions in the lead.
 * I also think the lead overstates the whole "feta is only made in Greece" issue. It's simply a marketing agreement. The EU does not allow other cheeses to be called feta in the EU, and there are agreements with some non-EU places not to use the name feta. That's fine, and we need to, and do, cover this, but the EU isn't the whole world and I don't think that Wikipedia should be claiming that feta is only made in Greece simply because it is a protected designation of origin product in the EU. An identical cheese made with the same type of milk elsewhere is still feta, regardless of whether the EU calls it feta.Meters (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Health Issues vs Benefits
The section is called Health Benefits because it outlines nutritional benefits of the cheese, standard for food articles. The section was renamed Health Issues with additional content (possibly to fit an agenda), but the Health Benefits were kept in place. Please create a separate section if you feel this new information is encyclopedic. Apologies for lack of explanation on the previous edit. Kstern (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Calling the section on nutrition "health benefits" seems promotional and not neutral in tone, especially since one of the things the section points out is the very high salt/sodium density per calorie, which is not a benefit at all. The section as written also seemed to claim that feta (and other traditional Greek dairy products) are better than other dairy products and other cheeses, when in fact as far as I can tell it has very typical nutritional profile for a cheese, with a higher proportion of CLA because it is made of ewe's milk. Not to mention that the list of probiotics is not sourced. It would be nice, too, if the other nutritional information came from a scientific or governmental site rather than Self, a health and beauty lifestyle magazine.
 * A more neutral title would probably be simply "Nutrition", as in the Broccoli. --Macrakis (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Puffery
Article currently reads "Feta is lower in fat and calories than aged cheeses like Parmigiano-Reggiano or Cheddar weight-for-weight because it has higher water content." A couple of problems with this. What is the point of this comparison? Of course it will be lower in calories and fat weight-for-weight since it is soaked in brine. But it is actually higher in fat per calorie than those cheeses, which is a more interesting statistic. Another problem: there is no standard for cheddar.... --Macrakis (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

History
The sources actually do discuss feta specifically and in the wider historical context of Greek cheese production. The European Commission, for example, accurately mentions a "primitive form of feta" in ancient Greece. 173.70.55.60 (talk) 18:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * The article on the EU site is obviously promotional ("a cheese with a history as rich as its taste") and not sourced to serious literature. Where did they get "A primitive form of feta is even mentioned in the Odyssey, where the hero Odysseus takes the cheese made by the cyclops Polyphemus whilst escaping from his cave", for example? All the text says is that he curdled the milk and drained it in wicker, which describes the production of all cheese. What's more, since the cheese is stored in wicker racks (ταρσοὶ μὲν τυρῶν βρῖθον) and not barrels, it's clearly not feta, primitive or not. --Macrakis (talk) 18:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * The websource is straight from the European Commission on the subject of feta's PDO that includes a summary of feta's history (so dismissing it as "promotional" is neither convincing nor constructive when the Wikipedia entry on feta covers the whole PDO issue in detail). Also, "they" (i.e., members of the European Commission) got their information about feta from the same historical source that scholars have used in their studies of Greek cheese production that includes, and is germane to, feta production. As for the Greek word ταρσοὶ, it means "frame of wicker-work", "crate" or "flat basket" and not strictly "wicker racks" (see Liddell and Scott's A Greek-English Lexicon). But even if wicker racks were exclusively used does not change the historical reality that traditional feta was, and still is, made with the same ingredients/processes as other Greek cheeses, a fact that Anna Polychroniadou-Alichanidou correctly mentions. So neither you nor I can say what is or is not "primitive feta" meaning that if reliable sources say that the cheese in Homer's Odyssey is a precursor of feta or is made with the same ingredients/processes as feta, then that's what we go by. Lastly, your reading of the Odyssey neglects to mention the fact that Polyphemus "sat down and milked the ewes and bleating goats" and then "curdled half the white milk, and gathered it in wicker baskets and laid it away, and the other half he set in vessels that he might have it to take and drink, and that it might serve him for supper" (ἑζόμενος δ᾽ ἤμελγεν ὄις καὶ μηκάδας αἶγας, πάντα κατὰ μοῖραν, καὶ ὑπ᾽ ἔμβρυον ἧκεν ἑκάστῃ. αὐτίκα δ᾽ ἥμισυ μὲν θρέψας λευκοῖο γάλακτος πλεκτοῖς ἐν ταλάροισιν ἀμησάμενος κατέθηκεν, ἥμισυ δ᾽ αὖτ᾽ ἔστησεν ἐν ἄγγεσιν, ὄφρα οἱ εἴη πίνειν αἰνυμένῳ καί οἱ ποτιδόρπιον εἴη). The curdled white milk derived from ewes and goats placed in vessels is what feta is (or is based on), primitive or otherwise. At the end of the day, the Wikipedia entry is not helped by any downplaying of feta's historical context involving Greek cheese production since feta was not created in a vacuum. 173.70.55.60 (talk) 20:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Polychroniadou-Alichanidou is a scientific study, and gives zero sources related to history.

 * So scientific studies about feta and feta production are verboten? No dice. Also, the author does provide historical evidence if you actually read her work. And dismissing the reliability of Polychroniadou-Alichanidou's research on the grounds that it is a "scientific study" makes no sense since the Wikipedia entry on feta cites and uses reliable sources including scientific studies. 173.70.55.60 (talk) 21:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Polychroniadou-Alichanidou's paper is about the manufacture, composition, microbiology, and biochemistry of feta, well-supported with 51 footnotes to the literature. The business about Homer etc. is in the introduction, and there are no sources given for it. A source that is reliable for the manufacture and biochemistry of cheese is not necessarily reliable for history. --Macrakis (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Even if that is true, her work is reliable even with respect to the history of feta despite not dedicating her entire work strictly to the cheese's socio-cultural and historical development. 173.70.55.60 (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * I have rewritten the section with better sources -- Dalby and Kindstedt.

 * Your sources are not necessarily better, but they are used to reflect your particular anti-scientific POV. 173.70.55.60 (talk) 21:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * "Anti-scientific"?! What do you mean by that? --Macrakis (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * It's in reference to your consistent deletion of the reliable Polychroniadou-Alichanidou source . 173.70.55.60 (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * See WP:CONTEXTMATTERS. P-A is a food scientist, and the article is no doubt a reliable source for the science of feta cheese. I don't know if she has also worked on food history issues, but as I said above, this article is not about history, and doesn't provide any sources for what it says about history. --Macrakis (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Homer clearly talks about making cheese from ewes and goat's milk, but says nothing about brining, which is what is characteristic of feta. --Macrakis (talk) 20:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * So the absence of brining is the absence of feta? If that were true and if brining were the only thing defining feta as a cheese, then everything in the Wikipedia entry except for salty water would be removed. 173.70.55.60 (talk) 21:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Of course brining is not the only thing defining feta. But not all cheeses made in Greece of sheep and/or goat milk are feta, and P-A makes this clear in her definition: "Feta cheese is a white, semihard cheese made from sheep's milk (or mixtures of sheep's and goat's milk), which is ripened and stored in brine." and she proceeds to put it in the category of "pickled cheeses". So it is quite clear that this is a necessary part of the definition. --Macrakis (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Then the brining is an additive that does not change the substance of the "white, semihard cheese" made from curdled goat's/sheep's milk. So Greek cheese production constitutes the immediate (and relevant) historical context that serves as the basis of feta and should not be watered down or downplayed with facts about Canaanite cheese production (not that Canaanite cheese production isn't interesting on its own). 173.70.55.60 (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Is Penicillium roqueforti also just "an additive that does not change the substance" of the well-known cheese made of curdled sheep's milk in southern France? Would feta be feta if it were not brined?
 * Canaanite cheese is directly relevant because we have a RS which mentions the possibility of specifically a brined white cheese being produced in the eastern Mediterranean.
 * The EU PDO page is transparently promotional, doesn't cite its sources, and gives no indication of being reliable for word history. The Oxford Companion to Cheese is only a little better, but at least it is non-promotional. It would be good to find a better source. Unfortunately, I don't think there is a historical dictionary of modern Greek yet. --Macrakis (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with Macrakis, except about the definition of the EU PDO page, which I would rather define hagiographic. But the result is the same. Alex2006 (talk) 09:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

USA usage
The way the EU regional cheese thing work hurts my head as an American. In America feta is a generic term for a greek kind of cheese usually not made in Greece. I think the idea that a cheese maker can step over the border and have their cheese stop being feta go not work with American cheese understanding, so there’s a real disconnect. This article obviously isn’t about how “feta” is used in English but about how the term is used in Europe, which excludes the majority of feta eating English speakers. 97.113.57.76 (talk) 09:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

 * You know, things arent that simple- "I dont care" doesnt mean "It doesnt matter". This article is about feta. Feta is from Europe. Some fetas from the Americas may have in reality no connection to the original cheese, so let's not simplify this article just because it looks irrelevant from your pov. How would you like to cut short an article about a random town in the US just because nobody else cares about it? Thank you and I hope you will break your bubble-just because it isnt in America doesnt mean its less important 🧚🧚😍😍😘😘 2A02:2F0C:5703:1700:B905:3FF7:F308:8FFF (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Feta


text: Category:Arch Enemy albums

title: Category:Arch Enemy albums


text:
TerrorVision

TerrorVision is a 1986 American science fiction horror comedy film directed by Ted Nicolaou, produced and written by Albert and Charles Band and composed by Richard Band, all of whom would go on to found and work with Full Moon Features in 1989. TerrorVision was made by Empire International Pictures, the production company owned by Charles Band prior to Full Moon, and was released in February 1986.

The story follows an alien creature sent to Earth, which ends up inside a household where three kids must take care of it to prevent it from going into a hungry rampage. While not a critical or commercial success, it later developed as a cult film, particularly a "so bad it's good" film.

Plot
On an alien planet named Pluton, an alien garbage disposal converts a monstrous mutant called a Hungry Beast into energy and beams it into space. Meanwhile, on Earth, the Putterman family is getting satellite television, courtesy of a temperamental DIY satellite antenna. The reception is poor at first, but suddenly strengthens when a bolt of the alien energy hits the dish.

Sherman Putterman and his ex-military, survivalist grandfather set out to enjoy a night of horror films hosted by the buxom Medusa. Meanwhile, Sherman's parents go out to meet some swingers and his sister Suzy goes out with her rocker boyfriend O.D. Sherman and his grandfather eventually fall asleep, but are awakened when the Hungry Beast materializes out of the TV and eats the grandfather. Sherman's parents later arrive along with swingers Cherry and Spiro. Despite Sherman's plea, his mother locks him in the fallout shelter so he will not ruin their evening.

Sherman tries calling the police, but they take him to be a prank caller. He also calls Medusa, but she dismisses him as a psychotic. Later, the Beast travels through the television into the house's sex-themed "Pleasure Dome", eats Cherry, and imitates her to lure Spiro. Sherman's parents also get eaten after they discover the remains of the swingers. Sherman uses some plastic explosive to break out of the bunker as O.D. and his sister arrive.

Sherman's sister does not believe his story about a monster, and when they check their parents' room, they find imitations of them, their grandfather and the swingers. Soon after though, they encounter the Beast in another room. It chases after them, but relents at the sight of O.D.'s heavy metal paraphernalia, which he finds appealing due to its resemblance of his caretaker's gloves. They then discover that they can subdue the Beast with food and television, and teach it a few words such as "TV", "music" and their names. They consider using the Beast for profit, and call Medusa in the hope of securing a TV appearance. She is initially dismissive, but shows interest when they promise to hold a party.

However, the Beast becomes enraged and eats O.D. when its alien captor appears on the TV to warn the earthlings that they must destroy their television equipment to prevent the Beast from spreading; The alien had overreacted to the announcement from Pluthar, the alien captor, and O.D. provoked the monster in an attempt to calm it down. A police officer arrives to arrest Sherman for the prank calls only to be eaten by the Beast. Sherman breaks all the TVs he can find, and eventually Pluthar appears through the television to exterminate the Beast. Medusa arrives at the house and kills Pluthar, mistakenly believing that he is in fact the Beast that Sherman and Suzy have described to her. When the real monster arrives, it sucks the group of three into its mouth with a powerful gust of air.

The next morning, Medusa's chauffeur is woken up by a crude imitation of his employer hiding in the back seat of his car, demanding to be taken to the TV station.

Cast

 * Chad Allen as Sherman Putterman
 * Diane Franklin as Suzy Putterman
 * Mary Woronov as Raquel Putterman
 * Gerrit Graham as Stanley Putterman
 * Bert Remsen as Grampa Putterman
 * Jon Gries as O.D.
 * Jennifer Richards as Medusa
 * Alejandro Rey as Spiro
 * Randi Brooks as Cherry
 * Frank Welker as Hungry Beast Alien (voice)
 * Ian Patrick Williams as Officer Nutky
 * Sonny Carl Davis as Norton
 * William Paulson as Pluthar
 * John Leamer as the Chauffeur

Production
The film was shot back-to-back with Empire Pictures' Troll in Italy, at the Stabilimenti Cinematografici Pontini studios near Rome. Many of the same crew worked on both productions, including creature effects designer John Carl Buechler (who also directed Troll), cinematographer Romano Albani, and composer Richard Band. The two films were released a month apart from each other in the United States.

Release
The film was given a limited release theatrically in the United States by Empire Pictures in February 1986. It grossed $320,256 at the box office.

In 2007, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer released a widescreen version of the film on Showtime.

In 2012, Shout! Factory announced that they would be releasing the film on DVD and Blu-ray as part of their Scream Factory lineup. A DVD/Blu-ray double feature of TerrorVision/The Video Dead was released in February 2013.

Soundtrack
The soundtrack to the film was originally released on vinyl by Restless Records in 1986. It was reissued in 2017 on CD by Intrada Records.

In addition to Richard Band's original score, several songs (including the movie's theme) were contributed by Los Angeles art rock band The Fibonaccis. TerrorVision was hoped to bring more attention to the group, but the movie (and ultimately the soundtrack) failed.

Tracklist:

 * 1) "TerrorVision" - The Fibonaccis
 * 2) "The Friends of Crime" - The Fibonaccis
 * 3) "Sack of Suit Suite" - The Fibonaccis
 * 4) "Advice to a Mutant" - The Fibonaccis
 * 5) "He Can't Stop Laughing" - The Fibonaccis
 * 6) Space Garbage
 * 7) Norton's Theme
 * 8) The Monster Materializes
 * 9) Gramps Bites the Big One
 * 10) Pluthar and the Kids
 * 11) Monster Attacks Sherman
 * 12) Spiro Gets Giacuzzed
 * 13) Bomb Shelter
 * 14) Officer Nupky's Bad Timing
 * 15) Susie and Sherman
 * 16) Good Morning All

Reception
Janet Maslin of The New York Times wrote: "The film's style is so smugly stupid that it's hard to tell whether the creatures, dripping with primordial ooze, are any less attractive than the Puttermans" and also called the film "noisly [sic] campy without being the least bit clever." Variety dismissed it as "an uninvolving sci-fi thriller comedy that relies heavily for its shock value on gooey monster effects rather than cinematic finesse ... With the apparent intent of making some comments about our unnatural reliance on television, and technology in general, filmmakers have perhaps bit off too much." Writing in the Chicago Tribune, Rick Kogan gave the film one star out of four and called it "a certifiably bad movie" with "a good deal that is distasteful," but also found it "strangely likable" because Nicolaou "has done a better job than most who have tackled this particular beat. He has a nice feel for pacing if not for tension, a good eye for detail if often excessive and an occasional burst of humor."

Patrick Goldstein of the Los Angeles Times wrote, "There are a few wonderful moments scattered throughout the picture, clearly the kind of goofy monster mash that should be seen long after midnight when your brain is operating at half-speed ... But to mix up the gross-outs with gags you need a good curve ball — the jokes should have a real spin to them. That weird comic rhythm is missing here. In fact, Nicolaou has such a terrible sense of timing that the scenes drag on long after every laugh has been squeezed dry." David Maine of Pop Matters called "TerrorVision "a truly wretched movie."

On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, TerrorVision holds an approval rating of 10% based on ten reviews.

title: TerrorVision


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annee Pai Gaee

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (no valid keep votes) -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Annee Pai Gaee
I tried multiple variant spellings, but Google turned up nothing. Hoax? DS 21:39, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn foreign phrase. JamesBurns 08:31, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. So is "ciao". It is understandable that discussions of colloquial niceties of small communities are not found in research papers on the web. 19:10, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. And "éminence grise" as well. Anyway, I can think of lots of fragments of useful knowledge which can not be found by search engines. That does not mean that they should not be part of a body of knowledge, especially one such as an encyclopedia, which should err on the side of inclusiveness instead of the other way around.

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Rubeel

Image copyright tags
Thanks for uploading Image:20050410041135.gif and Image:20050416122634.jpg. I notice they currently do not have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Evil Monkey∴Hello 21:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Capital Development Authority
Your article Capital Development Authority has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 03:27, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:20050416122634.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:20050416122634.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rubeel


text:
N15 road (Ireland)

The N15 road is a national primary road in the north-west of Ireland. It runs from Sligo to Lifford, County Donegal. It forms part of the proposed Atlantic Corridor route. It also goes to the border with Northern Ireland.

Route
The N15 commences halfway across Lifford Bridge (which crosses the River Foyle between County Donegal and County Tyrone), continuing the route of the A38 (from Strabane on the east side of the river). In Lifford, west of the River Foyle, the N14 meets the N15, ending at a junction in the town centre. The N15 leaves to the southwest, changing to run west at the point just west of Clady. It continues west through Castlefin, Liscooley and Killygordon to reach Stranorlar.

In Stranorlar, the N13 commences, leaving the N15 to head north, with the N15 itself turning southwest to cross the River Finn to enter Ballybofey. From here, it continues southwest through the mountains and Barnesmore Gap (passing southeast of Bluestack Mountain) towards Donegal Town. East of the town itself, the N56 road starts at a junction on the N15 and runs around the north of the town, with the N15 turning to the south, to bypass the eastern side of Donegal Town. The N15 crosses the Drumenny Burn on the eastern outskirts of Donegal Town.

South of Donegal Town, the N15 passes by Ballintra to the west. Further south, the route follows a road opened in 2006, bypassing Ballyshannon to the east and crossing the River Erne on a viaduct.

The road enters County Leitrim in the west of Ireland, directly west of Bundoran (the bypass passes south of the town). Tullaghan is the only village along the N15 in the county, also bypassed.

The N15 runs closer to the coastline in County Sligo, passing through Cliffoney and Grange as it proceeds southwest. The road then passes through the villages of Drumcliff and Rathcormack before entering Sligo. The route ends at the start of the N4, which continues through the town as the Sligo Inner Relief Road dual carriageway.

Planned and Completed upgrades
The 20 km route between Lifford and Stranorlar is a single carriageway road of very poor quality. A replacement of the current alignment with a new single carriageway road is planned, bypassing Castlefin, Liscooley, and Killygordon. This will connect with a 16 km 2+1 bypass of Stranorlar and Ballybofey which is also planned. This will bypass the towns to the south, with a new crossing of the River Finn.

The N15 runs for over 26 km in County Sligo, passing north of the mountains and around Benbulbin before turning around Drumcliffe Bay to enter Sligo Town. A bypass of the entire route was planned, with dual carriageway for at least part of the route. A route had been selected for the project, with the new road to run closer to the mountains and the bay than the existing N15. However, the NRA didn't give funding for the road and the project was suspended The local radio station in the North-West, Ocean FM had a special report in 2017 on how the road in Sligo needs to be upgraded in the wake of 3 crashes on this stretch of road in less than a fortnight.

Instead of a completely new route, the NRA and TII decided to go ahead with a project called the N4-N15 Urban Improvements scheme starting with the widening of Hughes Bridge to a six-lane bridge and progressed as a Minor Improvement Scheme from 2015 through to mid-2016 costing €2.5 Million before VAT. The project was completed on 17 July 2016

Continuing with the N4-N15 Urban Improvements, in August 2019, it was announced that €14 Million had been allocated for a 730-meter upgrade form Hughes bridge to just past the N4-N15-N16 junction. It would include a six-lane carriageway, improved cycle paths and footpaths, LED streetlights, upgrades on Copper bridge on the N15, and a major redesign of the R291 Rosses Point Junction. Work was originally supposed to take 12 months and start in August 2019 and finish in the autumn of 2020. The finish date was then extended to spring 2021, but the project continued.

A major repaving of the road from Creevykeel Crossroads to Castelgal was started in mid-October 2019 and were very nearly complete before the Covid-19 lockdown happened in Ireland. They returned in late May to put the finishing touches on the road. The road improvements included Lowering the speed limit at Creevykeel Crossroads to 60 km/h either side of the crossroads. Despite the road improvements, The road from Castelgal to The Sligo county boundary was still in bad condition with locals calling for the whole road to be repaved.

In September 2020, Ocean FM Reported that TII allocated between 3 and 4 million Euros to upgrade a stretch of road that is 3.5 Kilometres long between Grange and the townland of Cashelgarran at Henrys Restaurant. It would include rebuilding, strengthening and repaving the stretch of road.

title: N15 road (Ireland)


text:
File:WDNR.JPG

Licensing
-

title: File:WDNR.JPG


text:
List of storms named Ramon

The name Ramon has been used for five tropical cyclones worldwide, three in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, and two in the Philippines by PAGASA in the Western Pacific.

In the Eastern Pacific:
 * Hurricane Ramon (1987) – strong Category 4 hurricane whose remnants produced heavy rainfall in Southern California
 * Tropical Storm Ramon (2017) – weak and short-lived tropical storm near the coast of Southern Mexico
 * Tropical Storm Ramon (2023) – late-season tropical storm that did not threaten any land areas

In the Western Pacific:
 * Tropical Storm Banyan (2011) (T1120, 23W, Ramon) – struck the Philippines
 * Typhoon Kalmaegi (2019) (T1926, 27W, Ramon) – Category 2 typhoon that also struck the Philippines

title: List of storms named Ramon


text:
1989 Conservative Party leadership election

The 1989 Conservative Party leadership election took place on 5 December 1989. The incumbent Margaret Thatcher was opposed by the little-known 69-year-old backbencher MP Sir Anthony Meyer. It was the Conservative Party's first leadership election for nearly 15 years, when Thatcher had taken the party leadership.

Whilst Thatcher comfortably won with 90% of the vote, the vote showed 60 MPs who didn't vote for her either by choosing Meyer, spoiling the ballots or abstaining. This can be attributed to her increasingly Eurosceptic views on European integration in the late 80s, despite the Conservatives still being pro Europe at the time. The outcome would ultimately undermine Thatcher as her leadership started to come into question. The following year would see Thatcher once again challenged and eventually resigning following further unrest and  discontent with her party.

Background
During 1989 the Conservative government led by Thatcher had run into difficulties. In June Labour won their first national electoral victory since 1974 in the elections to the European Parliament, beating the Conservatives. The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Nigel Lawson, had resigned in October over Thatcher's determination to follow the advice of her advisers, specifically Sir Alan Walters. Opinion polls were also starting to show a widening Labour lead, which had opened up since the Community Charge (or "poll tax") was phased in the previous April; public anger at this community charge mounted over the subsequent months. Thatcher had long considered, as her husband Denis desired, to stand down in May 1989 following 10 years as prime minister. However, having won a 102-seat majority at the general election two years previously, and having led the party for 14 years without a hint of a leadership challenge, Thatcher opted to carry on for a full third term.

As a result, Thatcher faced mounting internal party criticism, which culminated in the decision of Meyer to offer a stalking horse candidacy for the party leadership.

Sir Anthony Meyer was critical of the recently introduced Community Charge (which was seen by many as the key factor in the government's declining popularity), Thatcher's leadership style and her Euroscepticism. She had now led the party for nearly 15 years and had been prime minister for over 10 of those years.

Thatcher's European views came under attack from other Conservatives during the campaign. On 3 December, two days before the ballot, the BBC broadcast a programme on Jacques Delors in which Thatcher's predecessor as Conservative leader, Edward Heath, had labelled Thatcher as a "narrow little nationalist" who was "unable to move with the whole movement of history in creating the greater Europe." Meanwhile European Commissioner and former member of her cabinet, Leon Brittan had said on television that membership of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism had benefited the countries which had joined it, which was seen as being at odds with Mrs Thatcher's own views.

Results

Reactions
Thatcher, whose campaign was organised by former Cabinet minister George Younger, won the contest overwhelmingly and said afterwards:

"I would like to say how very pleased I am with this result and how very pleased I am to have had the overwhelming support of my colleagues in the House and the people from the party in the country."

However, a total of 60 Conservative MPs did not support Thatcher by either voting for Meyer, spoiling their ballot papers, or abstaining. Michael Heseltine was reported the next day as being believed to be one of the three MPs who did not vote, along with the absent Bob McCrindle who was seriously ill. Another ill MP, Alick Buchanan-Smith, was also absent, but voted by proxy, reportedly for Meyer.

Following the ballot Meyer said:

"I was quite surprised to get so many votes, I thought I'd be beaten by the abstentions. The total result I think is rather better than I'd expected and not quite as good as some of my friends were hoping for."

According to the next day's Glasgow Herald Heseltine's supporters predicted that unless the Prime Minister changed "her style of leadership", she would "be on her way out next year".

Aftermath
Within a year, as the Community Charge (poll tax) sparked riots, the economy slid towards recession, and the Labour lead in the opinion polls mounted into double digits, Thatcher resigned as party leader and Prime Minister following a further contest in November 1990.


text:
User:Bigcheesebebbs

Hello, I'm Matthew, a student studying marketing at Western Washington University. s

Articles which I've wrote

 * Economic shortage
 * Benaroya Hall
 * Eastern Oregon University
 * Joint Operating Agreement
 * Suburban infill
 * Western Washington University

Articles which I've contributed a great deal to

 * Hubbert's Peak
 * ethnocentrism
 * Dale Chihuly
 * Costco
 * Seattle, Washington
 * Eugene, Oregon
 * Portland, Oregon
 * Denver, Colorado
 * Seattle Post-Intelligencer
 * Seattle Times
 * The Stranger (newspaper)

 * List of metropolitan areas by population

Other work
I've also spent much time adding cities to the "Seattle metropolitan area" category and creating census maps to add to pages that belong to this region.

Websites & contact info
My personal websites can be found at Myspace and Xanga. I can also be reached on AOL instant messenger and Yahoo messenger ("bigcheesebebbs") or MSN messenger (mb10784).

title: User:Bigcheesebebbs


text:
Talk:Power Fist

PLEASE MERGE THIS..PLEAAAAAASE

-Please note that there is an article called Powerfist. That is a double article, but it's much more informative. I thinkwe shuld remore the contents of powerfist to this article.

obsolete redirect, and original/historical/ancient/traditional/definitive power fist
'Power Fist' is a poorly-named (ungrammatical, bad grammar) popular culture term redirected to an article no longer even mentioning the term, but even if it wasn't run-together words (unlike in that game's literature) there's a historical/ancient term (actually set of terms in a language's dialects) needed to be redirected to first (otherwise disambiguation: ) Changquan. Please, when creating articles, check for original/historical/ancient/traditional/definitive terms first.--dchmelik (t|c) 10:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Power Fist


text:
List of storms named Ramona

The name Ramona has been used for two tropical cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Ocean:

 * Tropical Storm Ramona (1967)
 * Tropical Storm Ramona (1971)

title: List of storms named Ramona


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Sellars

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete by request from the creator. Thue | talk 21:37, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Eric Sellars
Blanked vanity --PhilipO 21:42, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn vanity. JamesBurns 08:32, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Ilona Fehér

Merge Ilona Feher & Ilona Feher Foundation
"Ilona Feher" and the "Ilona Feher Foundation" are different, distinct entities.

Wikified. I do not understand the reason and do not know what action to take. Please advise. Thanks. (by USer:Micke5000, 23:58, 20 July 2005)

 * Sorry for not clarifying my intention when I've tagged the articles. Here goes...
 * Since Ilona Feher (the person) and Ilona Feher (the Foundation) are different things, the articles should reflect that. So the information about "the person" should be kept to a minimum in the article about "the Foundation", whatever is neede to estableish why it was named after her. If a reader wants more detailed info on "the person" (s)he will follow the link.
 * After doing a second and more carefull reading I must admit I may have been to hasty with the tagging. So I'll remove it, even if I still ask you to consider my suggestion of keeping the subjets well separated.
 * You did exactly what you should. You went to the talk page and disputed the merge suggestion.
 * Welcome! - Nabla 01:07, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Thanks again for the guidance. What you have written makes perfect sense. For the "foundation" I just copied the founders' text "as is" whithout editing. For the Wikipedia it may need rewriting. I'll review it and try to make it more focused where possible. Micke5000 05:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ilona Fehér


text:
User:Brent.devos

Brent W. Devos

Assistant Professor Department of Modern Languages The University of Lethbridge

website:

title: User:Brent.devos