text:
User talk:Vb7000

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 18:14, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Revs_Broken_Shoot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Revs_Broken_Shoot.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 03:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Discog sonic-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Discog sonic-2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 00:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revs ST.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Revs ST.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Discog sonic-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Discog sonic-2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Suck.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Suck.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rack and Ruin Records
A tag has been placed on Rack and Ruin Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja talk  20:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Dddstockholm.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dddstockholm.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Dublin Duck Dispensary for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dublin Duck Dispensary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dublin Duck Dispensary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. pinktoebeans (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vb7000


text:
Talk:Bambi effect

Merge and/or Transwiki
This article has sat here as a stub since 2005. There haven't been any substantial edits since the no-consensus AfD in 2007. It seems its time to face the fact that this is a dictionary definition and not much more. I think it should probably be moved over to Wiktionary and this page should be turned into a soft redirect. Alternately, it could be merged somewhere if we can find consensus on a target article. Thoughts anyone? Beeblebrox (talk) 18:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I would add that there had been no talk on this page for the last eight months, which is why I archived it. You can still access the old talk through the links in the box to the right. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Endorse redirect MikeHobday (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Clarify?
The term is also found as LGBT slang, where the Bambi effect is used to refer to "the turning of a young (otherwise homosexual) man's fancy to (heterosexual) love [the parting of the youthful Bambi and his erstwhile pal Thumper in the Disney film Bambi

What? --Moni3 (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC) It might be relevant to cite the age of the citation on that, because I don't know anyone in the GLBT community, myself included, that recognizes that use. Does anyone know of a recent citation that includes it? I realize that's probably not necessary at wiki, but I still... think it's relevant.--NM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.212.135 (talk) 03:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. Drmies (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Whether or not it's relevant, it shouldn't be mentioned in this article, since it's a completely different meaning. This is why we have disambiguation. --NE2 06:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, but it isn't notable enough to stand on its own, and I'd venture to say that given the quote it's based on the same characteristics of human behavior and attraction. More work is to be done here. NM, perhaps you can find out? Drmies (talk) 18:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm moving the section here for now, since it's not used in the same sense as the rest of the article and so doesn't belong in it.--TyrS (talk) 03:46, 19 March 2010 (UTC) ==LGBT slang== The term is also found in LGBT slang, where "Bambi effect" means a young gay man's foray into heterosexuality: "the turning of a young (otherwise homosexual) man's fancy to (heterosexual) love [the parting of the youthful Bambi and his erstwhile pal Thumper in the Disney film Bambi (1942)]." In The Gay Report it was described as the effect "where the young males in spring all suddenly turn their attention away from each other towards females with puffy cheeks, red lips, batting eyelashes, etc. - where even Bambi and Thumper don't need each other any more".

Unencyclopedic & POV
The article is written from the obvious POV of uncritical agreement with a hypothetical and not scientifically supported 'effect', which comes across as being more of a jocular, mainstream-media-friendly neologism than a serious hypothesis. The sources (which are not psychological studies) simply use the phrase, they don't perform serious research or study on this purported 'effect'.--TyrS (talk) 03:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * So you say. Drmies (talk) 01:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

rm non-applicable 'see also' section
==See also== * Bambi Meets Godzilla

It's not sufficiently clear how Bambi Meets Godzilla is worth linking to from this article.--TyrS (talk) 03:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

rm sentence re acts of hunting
It's unclear why this was included. The reference is "A personal journey", suggesting it's far from being a scientifically sound source.--TyrS (talk) 04:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Witnessing disturbing acts of hunting can lead to "feeling sympathy for the prey and hatred for the predators".

move OR clause with citation here for now
"which would explain..." is totally OR. Also, the attempt to make a connection between attraction to human-baby-like-looking animals and sympathy for "furry or feathered animals"* makes no sense unless you've got a furry or feathered human baby. Sentence moved here for now in case someone wants to try to work the citation back in in a non-OR, etc, way.--TyrS (talk) 04:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

which would explain the sympathy humans feel for furry or feathered animals and their aversion to scaly creatures.

* Originally the sentence appeared as:
 * "A secondary meaning is sometimes found in psychology, where the term may be used to refer to a perceived tendency in "humans...to find animals attractive that have characteristics similar to those [of] human babies", which would explain the sympathy humans feel for furry or feathered animals..."

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bambi effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060423204000/http://www.zwire.com/site/tab2.cfm?newsid=14062217&BRD=2553&PAG=461&dept_id=506066&rfi=6 to http://www.zwire.com/site/tab2.cfm?newsid=14062217&BRD=2553&PAG=461&dept_id=506066&rfi=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

To Kill a Mockingbird
I know I ought simply to be bold, but I suspect this has come up before. It seems to me that the famous (eponymous) speech from To Kill a Mockingbird is a very straightforward summary of the Bambi Effect, and therefore would warrant inclusion - maybe even just as a reference or "see also". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:2174:D100:A0D5:3B7C:8032:CF61 (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Bambi effect


text:
Belle Perez

Maribel Pérez (born 29 January 1976), best known by her stage name Belle Perez, is a Belgian-Spanish musician and songwriter.

Born in Neerpelt to Spanish parents as María Isabelle Pérez Cerezo, the Flemish singer was discovered for her musical talents by Patrick Renier at a local talent show in 1997 at the age of 21. In 1999 she participated in the Belgian preselections of the Eurovision Song Contest and from then on Belle's career in music took off. She started off in pop music but in 2002 she changed her style to Latino/pop and went live on stage with her own "Baila Perez"-band. The album that came with it was an instant success and remained on the top spot in the Belgian charts for several weeks.

As of 2006, she has achieved a relatively high level of fame in her native Belgium and the Netherlands. She has also become the presenter of a popular Dutch music show. Perez participated in the Belgian tryouts for the 2006 Eurovision Song Contest, but ended up getting 3rd place. Her newest album Gotitas De Amor was released on 23 August 2006. In December 2006 she released her 4th single of "Gotitas de amor", called "Hoy (Le pido a dios)", a ballad.

On 5 May she will be performing another "Mega Latino"-Concert in the Sportpaleis Antwerp. She will be performing in front of about 15,000 people. According to some articles on her fan-site she is planning to release a CD in Germany, Austria and Switzerland upcoming summer. She has already signed a contract. Due to some rumours "El mundo bailando" is going to be the first single in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Before summer she will release another single from her album "Gotitas De Amor" in Belgium and Netherlands which will be "Amor Latino" and it peaked in Belgium on Position 11.

In June 2007 she released her first album "Gotitas De Amor" and the first single "El Mundo Bailando" in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. In the meantime she recorded a new single called "Djolei! Djolei!" which was released on 15 June 2007 in Belgium and Netherlands. Once again it is a song for the upcoming summer and so she is heading again for her next Radio 2-Summer-Award-Trophy in August 2007. She also posed twice for the men's magazine FHM.

In 2008 Belle Pérez and her spouse Mario Winters, with whom she had been a couple as early as 1995 and whom she married in the deepest secret in 2000, broke up after an 8-year marriage. Some months later Belle met 25-year-old Dutch jewel designer Wouter van der Horst in Antwerp, and they have been going steady since then.

Belle released her new album "Gipsy" in 2008 and made the top10 in both Belgium and The Netherlands. Appreciation in The Netherlands for her music grows and tours bring Belle more to there than to Belgium. In 2009 Belle celebrates her 10-year career. A book has been published containing her ups and downs in the last 10 years and a DVD has been released of a concert without any audience. At the same time a big concert was announced for the fall of 2009. However, in September 2009 it was announced that the big concert originally planned is downsized: a smaller concert hall but a sold-out crowd. Belle and her team state that she will go in a new direction with her music and that she wants to try new international adventures. She separates from her manager at that time, Patrick Renier, and goes on with Hugo Foets who also has been in the background.

For the second year in a row she is asked to be a special musical guest in the Holiday on Ice Shows. In 2008 she did them in Belgium, in 2009 in The Netherlands. After these shows she will focus on her new tour in The Netherlands: a theater tour "Latino Mundial".

DVDs

 * Baila Perez (2003)
 * The Best of Belle Perez (2005)Gold (16.000 sold copies in Belgium)
 * Mega Latino Concert – Sportpaleis Antwerpen (2006)
 * Diez (2009)

Awards and achievements

 * 2000 – Zamu Award – "Best Pop Artist"
 * 2002 – Golden Award for single "Me & You" (both in The Netherlands & Belgium)
 * 2002 – Zomerhit Award 'Me And You' Ft Jody Bernal
 * 2003 – Platinum Award for "Baila Perez"
 * 2003 – Zomerhit Award 'Enamorada'
 * 2004 – Zomerhit Award 'Light of My Life'
 * 2005 – Zomerhit Award 'Que Viva La Vida'
 * 2005 – Radio 2 Zomerhit "Favorite of the public" Award
 * 2005 – TMF Award – "Best Female Artist"
 * 2006 – Zomerhit Award Radio 2 'Ave Maria'
 * 2006 – Radio 2 Zomerhit "Favorite of the public" Award

Tours

 * Bailando 2006 (Belgium&Netherlands)May 2006 – November 2006
 * The Best of Belle Perez Live 2005/2006 (Belgium&Netherlands) August 2005 – March 2006
 * Bailando Tour 2006 (Belgium&Netherlands) March – September 2006
 * Latin Fever Tour 2006/2007 (Belgium&Netherlands) September 2006 – March 2007
 * Summer Tour 2007 (Netherlands) March – July 2007
 * Latin Days Tour 2007 (Netherlands) August 2007 – November 2007
 * Gipsy Live Tour 2008 (Belgium&Netherlands) December 2007 – January 2008
 * Gipsy Live Tour 2008, Part Two (Netherlands) January 2008 – April 2008
 * Diez Tour (Netherlands) January 2009 – April 2009
 * Special Guest @ Holiday on Ice (Netherlands) October 2009 – January 2010
 * Latino Mundial (Netherlands) January 2010 – April 2010

title: Belle Perez


text:
Richard Bozulich

Richard Bozulich (born 1936) is an American author, publisher of Go books in English and college math instructor. He co-founded the Ishi Press. He has worked with several Japanese professional players. He had a regular go column in The Daily Yomiuri, which at that time was Japan's largest English-language newspaper. He lives in Chigasaki, Japan. In 2012 Bozulich was a candidate for Comptroller of New York City for the War Veterans Party.

From university
Bozulich was born in Los Angeles, California. From 1955 to 1956, he attended UCLA, studying the foundations of mathematics in the philosophy department under Richard Montague. Eventually he graduated from the University of California, Berkeley in 1966 with a BA in mathematics. Bozulich had worked his way through college by buying and selling highly technical used books and upon graduation decided to become a book publisher.

Ishi Press
He moved to Japan and in 1967 in partnership with Stuart Dowsey founded The Ishi Press, a book and magazine publishing company that published books primarily about the game of go.

Ishi Press' first few publications were translations of Japanese books such as Eio Sakata's The Middle Game of Go and Modern Joseki and Fuseki Vol. I and II but Bozulich soon began working with Japanese professional players, as well as principal collaborators James Davies and John Power, to produce original works in English. The first of these, Basic techniques of Go by Nagahara and Haruyama, was published in 1969. In 1973, Bozulich asked James Davies to write a seven-volume set covering the fundamentals of go, titled The Elementary Go Series. The first two volumes of this series In the Beginning by Ishigure (and Davies) and 38 Basic Joseki by Kosugi and Davies were published in 1974. By 1984, the set was complete, when Ishi Press published Nagahara and Bozulich's Handicap Go. Meanwhile, Bozulich continued to translate and publish Japanese material for the nascent Western go-playing community, selecting volumes such as Kageyama's Lessons in the Fundamentals of Go and Kage's Secret Chronicles of Handicap Go, and a series of books about basic opening strategies: The Power of the Star-Point (Takagawa), The Chinese Opening: The Sure Win Strategy (Kato) and The 3–3 Point: Modern Opening Theory (Cho).

In 1977, the Japan Go Association ceased publication of Go Review, their English-language magazine. Working closely with Power, Bozulich published a quarterly magazine Go World which continued through 129 issues, ceasing publication in 2013. For many years Go World was the major source in English for comprehensive analysis of top Japanese tournament games.

Kiseido
In 1982 Bozulich founded Kiseido Publishing Company, publishing Invincible: The Games of Shusaku. This biography and game collection by John Power is about Honinbo Shusaku, the most famous Japanese player from the 1800s. Kiseido became more active in the 1990s, when Bozulich produced two more multi-volume sets of instructional material: the twelve volume Mastering the Basics series, and the ten volume Get Strong at Go series. Kiseido continues to publish other books as well, such as The Go Player's Almanac, The World of Chinese Go and An Introduction to Modern Fuseki: Korean Style.

Go World
Richard Bozulich has written or published more than one hundred books, magazines, and newspaper articles about the game of go. He is the world's most prolific author of go materials in English. Richard Bozulich was the publisher of Go World magazine until it ceased publication in 2012, after 129 issues. He lives in Chigasaki, Japan and has worked as an instructor of mathematics at Shonan Institute of Technology until 2005, physics and chemistry at a local college. His father and mother were from Dugi Otok, an island off Zadar in Croatia.

title: Richard Bozulich


text:
User:Kronus~enwiki

Nick: Kronus

Location: England

Wikipedian: Since Jan'2004

See also My English profile

title: User:Kronus~enwiki


text:
User talk:Iceboarder

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 18:16, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Big Book of Mischief

The article The Big Book of Mischief has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable book. Ghits are WP mirrors. Fails WP:BKCRIT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PaintedCarpet (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iceboarder


text:
User:Marco Passarani

yall need to shut up.

title: User:Marco Passarani


text:
Dusty... Definitely

Dusty... Definitely is the fourth studio album by singer Dusty Springfield, recorded and released in the UK in 1968. Production credits go to both John Franz, and for the first time, Springfield herself. The songs on this album were chosen because Springfield "liked them", as stated in the liner notes. Like the vast majority of her LPs, the album shows a diverse range of styles ranging from soul ("Take Another Little Piece of my Heart"), pop ("This Girl's in Love With You"), folk ("Morning (Bom Dia)") to lounge ("Who (Will Take my Place?)").

The two sides of the album reflected very different moods: the first side was packed with fast-paced, louder numbers, while the second side was more mellow, which Springfield suggested would be suitable for listening to at night.

The album was a moderate success and eventually entered the UK album's charts in the week ending 21 December 1968 debuting at No.38, peaking at No.30 the following week and staying at No.30 for two weeks until eventually dropping 10 places to No.40 the following week. However, it then rose again to No.36 the following week, where it remained for two weeks, before leaving the charts, having been on them for six weeks. This may have been in part with the fact that her top 10 single 'Son Of A Preacher Man was in the charts at the same time and was being promoted by Dusty in the US and other European countries. However it got to No.8 on the NME year end charts for best albums of 1968.

In 1968, Springfield entered into a contract with Atlantic Records for the United States, which meant that the singer had a different record label for each side of the Atlantic (previously she had been signed to Philips both in the UK and the USA). Springfield's new contract allowed Philips in the UK to release American recordings and Atlantic in the US to release British recordings. This was the first LP to be covered by this agreement. Atlantic was, however, reluctant to release any British recordings on their label; thus, the album was never released in the States.

Tracks from this album were finally released in the US in 1999 (the year of Springfield's death) on the Rhino Records compilation Dusty in London.

In the UK Dusty... Definitely was first released to CD by Philips Records/PolyGram in the early 1990s and in 2001 Mercury Records/Universal Music Group re-released a digitally remastered edition with four bonus tracks.

Track listing
Side A
 * 1) "Ain't No Sun Since You've Been Gone" (Sylvia Moy, Norman Whitfield, Cornelius Grant) – 2:46
 * 2) "Take Another Little Piece of My Heart" (Bert Berns, Jerry Ragovoy) – 2:36
 * 3) "Another Night" (Burt Bacharach, Hal David) – 2:13
 * 4) "Mr Dream Merchant" (Jerry Ross, Larry Weiss) – 3:04
 * 5) "I Can't Give Back the Love I Feel for You" (Nickolas Ashford, Valerie Simpson, Brian Holland) – 2:32
 * 6) * Note: 2001 CD-reissue erroneously includes the 1998 remix of the track
 * 7) "Love Power" (Teddy Vann) – 2:09

Side B
 * 1) "This Girl's in Love with You" (Burt Bacharach, Hal David) – 3:37
 * 2) "I Only Wanna Laugh" (William Shannon, Shannon Shor) – 3:06
 * 3) "Who (Will Take My Place)?" (Charles Aznavour, Herbert Kretzmer) – 3:04
 * 4) "I Think It's Gonna Rain Today" (Randy Newman) – 3:14
 * 5) "Morning (Bom Dia)" (Nana Caymmi, Gilberto Gil, Norma Tanega) – 2:46
 * 6) "Second Time Around" (Sammy Cahn, Jimmy Van Heusen) – 3:41

Bonus tracks 2001 CD re-issue
 * 1) "No Stranger Am I" (Norma Tanega) – 2:46
 * 2) * First UK release: Philips single BF 1682 (B-side of "I Close My Eyes and Count to Ten"). Release date: 28 June 1968.
 * 3) "Meditation (Meditação)" (Antônio Carlos Jobim, Newton Mendonça, Norman Gimbel) – 1:58
 * 4) * Outtake from the Dusty... Definitely sessions. First release: UK 4-CD box set The Legend of Dusty Springfield, 1994.
 * 5) "The Colour of Your Eyes" (Remix) (Molly McKernan, Norma Tanega) – 2:33
 * 6) * First UK release (Original mix): Philips single BF 1706 (B-side of "I Will Come to You"). Release date: 20 September 1968.
 * 7) "Spooky" (Buddy Buie, James B. Cobb, Harry Middlebrooks Jr., Mike Shapiro) – 2:44
 * 8) * First UK release: Philips single 6006 045 (B-side of "How Can I Be Sure"). Release date: 4 September 1970. (Note: recording date: 24 January 1968).

 * Producer tracks 13–16: Johnny Franz.

Other Tracks

"Sweet Lover No More" (David L. Frishberg) – 1:54
 * Outtake from the Dusty... Definitely sessions. First release: UK 4-CD box set The Legend of Dusty Springfield, 13 June 1994. Producer: Johnny Franz.

Personnel and production

 * Dusty Springfield – lead vocals, backing vocals, production
 * Lesley Duncan – backing vocals
 * Madeline Bell – backing vocals
 * Kay Garner – backing vocals
 * John Paul Jones – musical arranger & orchestra conductor, bass
 * Keith Mansfield – musical arranger & orchestra conductor
 * Peter Knight – orchestra conductor
 * Derek Wadsworth – musical arranger
 * Jim Tyler – musical arranger
 * Johnny Franz – record producer
 * Roger Wake – digital remastering/remix (2001 re-issue)
 * Mike Gill – digital remastering/remix (2001 re-issue)

title: Dusty... Definitely


text: User talk:Kutch

title: User talk:Kutch


text: User talk:69.107.57.239

title: User talk:69.107.57.239


text:
User talk:Max314

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Geez, like The Matrix much? :) Cheers. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 18:20, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Response from my talk page: Hey, no problem. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask. People around here are more than welcome to help. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 18:55, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

The Matrix Revolutions
Hey Max. I'd like to second the welcome above. I did worry that you would find the edit summaries of me and others in relation to the edits you made to the article a bit curt, and if so, I apologise. They're more for the purpose of describing what you're doing than justifying (which is what talk pages or so). They can thus come off as a bit arrogant if you're not sure of the motivation.

I must commend you on your application in absorbing Wikipedia principles. I think you're learning quite fast.

If there's a single, overall problem with the section you put in, it's that unfortunately, it still qualifies as fan speculation. I appreciate that it's quite a well-considered analysis, and that you do genuinely want to explicate the movie to outsiders. It struck me how much your edits would be appropriate for a dedicated Matrix-analysis site, and I ponder now whether it would be worthwhile to construct a dedicated wiki for that specific purpose. A number of general points, not necessarily related to anything you've done, to make about editing the article:

 * There is such a thing as too much detail. Wikipedia's systemic bias means that items such as The Matrix are always going to have an overwhelming abundance of material compared to say, Culture of Azerbaijan.  WikiProject Countering systemic bias is one project that is dedicated to combating this, and another is to be especially selective when covering a topic that due to its nature is going to be of high interest to the English-speaking, male internet-literate types that are Wikipedia's majority population.  A simple summary article - cf. one chosen more or less at random, The Godfather Part II - to my mind is if anything, more informative than the overblown morass that is the articles devoted to every aspect of say, Yu-Gi-Oh.
 * You made clear that the interpretation you placed was just one, and not necessarily better than any other. But precisely because there are so many different interpretations, we need to look seriously at which select few interpretations we are going to make mention of (with a preference for published, well-known and generally recognised pieces).  There was a long-running debate a while back over whether to include a link to a Marxist/Maoist analysis of the movie in the "External Links" section.  One of the reasons for its removal was that it was argued that the Marxist analyis, while perfectly valid, it was nonetheless an obscure or unimportant interpretation of the film.  This of course is always going to be subjective, but when something is your own interpretation, or even that of a whole group of fans, it may not be easy to see whether it's relevant or not.

Anyway, I've gasbagged enough for the moment, but I should say: don't be discouraged from editing the article; try not to take anything anyone has said about the content you've added personally; bring any issues up on the article talk page where they can be discussed, and I encourage you to have a look at editing in some of the many other areas of this fascinating project. Slac speak up!  01:19, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

BNP
Hi - I'm sure that your edits to BNP's talk page were in good faith, however please try and remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox - some Wikipedians no doubt voted for the BNP, who are a legitimate political party. Wikipedia does not want to risk being sued! Thanks, HawkerTyphoon 16:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

No worries! As long as you love Wikipedia as much as it loves you! HawkerTyphoon 18:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Dasam Granth
The article obviously needs a lot of work, if you have good sources it would be great it you would improve it. Arrow740 18:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Revolver chess 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver chess 300.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Revolver sorter 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver sorter 300.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Matrix oraclesmith 300.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix oraclesmith 300.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Matrix reloaded neostopssquiddies 600.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix reloaded neostopssquiddies 600.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Matrix revolutions suncity 300.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix revolutions suncity 300.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Matrix smithheadfrontcropstandinginhallwaylookingforwards.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix smithheadfrontcropstandinginhallwaylookingforwards.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Matrix smithmany 600.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix smithmany 600.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Matrix revolutions smithangelofdarkness 600.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix revolutions smithangelofdarkness 600.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Revolver soundtrack 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver soundtrack 300.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 20:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Revolver soundtrack 300.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Revolver soundtrack 300.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 20:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revolver 200.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver 200.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revolver aviandzach 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver aviandzach 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revolver chess 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver chess 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revolver jake 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver jake 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revolver jakechess 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver jakechess 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revolver macha 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver macha 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revolver sorter 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver sorter 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix revolutions neostationstare 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix revolutions neostationstare 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix revolutions smithangelofdarkness 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix revolutions smithangelofdarkness 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix revolutions zionaftermath 300.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix revolutions zionaftermath 300.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Matrix bb5 600.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix bb5 600.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix gunfight 600.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix gunfight 600.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix neorealvcg smaller.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix neorealvcg smaller.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix oraclesitsandtalkstoneo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix oraclesitsandtalkstoneo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix superpunchpending.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix superpunchpending.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Matrix kenwilber 600.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix kenwilber 600.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Matrix architectsittingandchatting.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix architectsittingandchatting.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Matrix reloaded neovarchitect 600.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Matrix reloaded neovarchitect 600.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:'Jupiter Ascending' Theatrical Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:'Jupiter Ascending' Theatrical Poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:'Jupiter Ascending' Theatrical Poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:'Jupiter Ascending' Theatrical Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Revolver soundtrack 300.gif

The file File:Revolver soundtrack 300.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Revolver (2005 film). Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:15, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:Max314


text:
Joseph Tyrrell

Joseph Burr Tyrrell, FRSC (November 1, 1858 – August 26, 1957) was a Canadian geologist, cartographer, mining consultant and historian. He discovered dinosaur (Albertosaurus sarcophagus) bones in Alberta's Badlands and coal around Drumheller in 1884. Canada's Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology in Alberta was named in his honour.

Tyrrell was born in Weston, Ontario, the fifth child of William and Elizabeth Tyrrell. He was the brother of Canadian explorer and author James William Tyrrell. He was a student at Weston Grammar School before graduating from Upper Canada College in 1876 and receiving a law degree from the University of Toronto in 1880. After articling for a law firm in Toronto, his doctor advised him to work outdoors due to his health.

He joined the Geological Survey of Canada in 1880, leading or participating in numerous explorations.

He published two books in 1888: A Brief Narrative of the Journeys of David Thompson and The Mammalia of Canada.

He led the 1893 and 1894 expeditions into the Northern Barren Lands, down the Dubawnt River, the first visit to the Kivalliq Region Barrenlands by a European since the explorations of Samuel Hearne in the 1770s. Joseph's younger brother, James William Tyrrell, accompanied him on the expedition, which included the first European contact with the Ihalmiut, Inuit from the interior of what is today Nunavut.

Tyrrell married Mary Edith Carey in 1894. They had three children: Mary (born 1896), George (born 1900), and Thomas (born 1906). Mary Edith was the founder and first president in 1921 of the Women's Association of the Mining Industry of Canada.

In 1894, Tyrrell stumbled upon biographical recollections (11 books of field notes, 39 journals, maps, and a narrative) of Canadian overland explorer, cartographer, and fur trader David Thompson and, in 1916, published them as David Thompson's Narrative.

Tyrrell went into the gold-mining business in 1898, a career that would last more than 50 years. In his work he published several books on gold fields. In 1912 he published The Law of the Pay-streak in Placer Deposits.

He was the mine manager of the Kirkland Lake Gold Mine in northern Ontario for many years starting in 1926.

Tyrrell retired to northeast Scarborough on the Rouge River, where he established substantial apple orchards and an interest in grafting and breeding. The expanded orchards, later managed by his son George, are now the site of the Toronto Zoo.

He died in Toronto in 1957 at the age of 98.

Places named for Tyrrell

 * Tyrrell Sea (prehistoric Hudson Bay)
 * Tyrrell Arm, the east section of Yathkyed Lake, Nunavut
 * Joseph Burr Tyrrell Park, Toronto, Ontario
 * Tyrrell Lake, a small alkali lake near Warner, Alberta.

Institutions named for Tyrrell

 * Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Drumheller, Alberta
 * J. B. Tyrrell Senior Public School in Scarborough, Ontario
 * Joseph Burr Tyrrell Elementary School in Fort Smith, Northwest Territories

Awards

 * 1896 Back Award, Royal Geographical Society
 * 1918 Murchison Medal, Geological Society of London
 * 1929 Honorary President, Royal Canadian Geographical Society
 * 1930 Daly Medal from the American Geographical Society
 * 1933 Flavelle Medal, Royal Society of Canada
 * 1947 Wollaston Medal, Geological Society of London
 * 1954 Professional Engineer's Medal from the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario
 * 1997 Canadian Mining Hall of Fame

Other honours

 * J.B. Tyrrell Historical Medal, Royal Society of Canada.

Tribute
On 1 November 2018, Google Doodle commemorated his 160th birthday.

title: Joseph Tyrrell


text:
Rumor Has It (film)

Rumor Has It (stylized as Rumor Has It... in the U.S. market) is a 2005 American romantic comedy film directed by Rob Reiner, and starring Jennifer Aniston, Kevin Costner, Shirley MacLaine and Mark Ruffalo. The concept of the screenplay by Ted Griffin is that a woman learns that her mother and grandmother may be the inspiration for the 1963 novel The Graduate by Charles Webb. The film received negative reviews from critics and was a box office disappointment, grossing $88.9 million against its $70 million budget.

Plot
In 1997, Sarah Huttinger, an obituary and wedding announcement writer for The New York Times, returns to her hometown of Pasadena, California, for her younger sister Annie's wedding, accompanied by her fiancé, lawyer Jeff Daly. When Sarah tells her grandmother Katharine Richelieu that she is unsure about getting married, Katharine lets slip that her late daughter, Sarah's mother Jocelyn, ran off to Cabo San Lucas a week before her own wedding.

Sarah visits her mother's best friend, Aunt Mitsy, who confirms that Jocelyn spent time with their prep school classmate Beau Burroughs the week before her wedding to Sarah's father Earl, and that Beau was friends with Charles Webb, the author of the novel The Graduate.

Jeff points out Sarah's parents were married just short of nine months before her birth, leading her to wonder if Beau might really be her biological father. Sarah also accuses her grandmother of being the inspiration for Mrs. Robinson, the older character who seduced the young man in The Graduate, who later ran away with her daughter.

After the wedding, Sarah decides to fly to San Francisco, where Beau, now a highly successful and very wealthy Silicon Valley Internet wizard, is giving a speech. She meets him; and he admits to sleeping with her mother and grandmother, but assures Sarah he couldn't be her father because he is sterile after having suffered blunt testicular trauma while playing a soccer game in high school. They go out for drinks, and the following morning Sarah wakes up in Beau's bed in his Half Moon Bay home – the third generation in her family to have sex with Beau.

Although guilt-stricken by her behavior, Sarah allows Beau to convince her to be his date at a charity ball, where she meets Beau's son Blake. Beau explains his wife wanted a biological child and was artificially inseminated with a sperm donor to become pregnant. Mollified, Sarah kisses him and is caught by Jeff, who has returned to California to find her after not hearing from her since she met Beau. An argument ensues and Jeff leaves her.

Dejected, Sarah returns to visit Katharine, who flies into a rage when she learns Beau has slept with her granddaughter. The two learn Annie suffered an anxiety attack while flying to her honeymoon and wants to talk to Sarah. Sarah tells her about the sexual relationship three generations of Richelieu/Huttinger women have had with Beau. She reassures Annie she truly is in love with her husband, Scott, and in doing so, realizes she's ready to marry Jeff.

It is also revealed that Earl was the one who accidentally caused Beau's testicular trauma. This makes Beau somewhat nervous to be around him, though Katherine is quite pleased by the revelation. Earl reveals to Sarah he always knew about Jocelyn and Beau's affair. Jocelyn returned to him because she loved him and he was someone with whom she could build a life. On the night she returned, Sarah was conceived. This explained the slightly early timing between her parents' wedding and her own birth.

Determined to win Jeff back, Sarah returns to New York City and tells her fiancé about her feelings. They reconcile on the condition that if they ever have a daughter, she will not be allowed anywhere near Beau. The film ends with Sarah and Jeff's wedding.

Cast
In addition, Kathy Bates appears, uncredited, in the role of Aunt Mitsy, while George Hamilton has a brief uncredited non-speaking cameo as himself.

Production
Screenwriter Ted Griffin was the initial director, but problems arose soon after principal photography began on July 21, 2004. The production fell several days behind schedule in the first week, and on August 5, Griffin fired cinematographer Edward Lachman from the project. Griffin was in turn let go by executive producer Steven Soderbergh the following day, and the production shut down in order to allow replacement Rob Reiner to make script, cast, and crew changes before resuming filming on August 18. Reiner replaced initial cast members Charlie Hunnam, Lesley Ann Warren, Tony Bill, and Greta Scacchi.

Critical response
On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 21% based on 116 reviews, with an average rating of 4.50/10. The site's critics consensus reads: "This riff on The Graduate has a solid cast, but is too lightweight to fully register." Metacritic gave the film a weighted average score of 35 out of 100 based on 29 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews". Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B" on an A+ to F scale.

A. O. Scott of The New York Times said, "I suppose Rumor Has It could be worse, though at the moment I'm at a loss to say just how. Ms. MacLaine and Mr. Costner are seasoned professionals, giving lackluster laugh lines more juice than they deserve, and Jennifer Aniston is as plucky and engaging as ever ... [but her] efforts are wasted in a movie that can't even seem to sustain interest in itself."

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times observed, "The plot ... sounds like a gimmick. That's because it is a gimmick. But it's a good gimmick. And Rumor Has It works for good reasons, including sound construction and the presence of Kevin Costner ... a natural actor with enormous appeal ... This is not a great movie, but it's very watchable and has some good laughs. The casting of Aniston is crucial, because she's the heroine of this story, and ... has the presence to pull it off."

Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle said, "The movie has that fatal triptych that is becoming Reiner's romantic-comedy signature: drippy sentiment, zany scenes that trivialize the characters and a horror of adventure ... needless to say, Rumor Has It fails as a successor to The Graduate. It fails artistically but also philosophically, in that it rebuts the spirit of the earlier film, while offering nothing attractive in its place."

Peter Travers of Rolling Stone awarded it one out of four stars, calling it a "comic turd" and adding, "The creepy script, by T.M. Griffin, is directed by Rob Reiner in a sleepwalking daze that Costner emulates by rotely repeating his performance in The Upside of Anger and in the process squeezing all the juice."

Brian Lowry of Variety said, "As muddled in most respects as its title, Rumor Has It... begins with an intriguing premise ... but it devolves into a bland romance spiced with too little comedy ... There's a germ of an idea here, but Reiner and Griffin race through the plot beats so rapidly that poor Sarah seldom has time to breathe, which also describes the movie ... [Aniston] never settles down enough to offer more than a shrill whine and pained expression."

Box office
The film opened at number 10 at the U.S. box office, on 2,815 screens on Christmas Day 2005, and earned $3,473,155 on that first day. It eventually grossed $43,000,262 domestically and $45,933,300 in international markets for a worldwide box office total of $88,933,562.

Home media
The film was released on DVD on May 9, 2006. It has grossed $21 million in US DVD sales.

title: Rumor Has It (film)


text:
Talk:Melissa Gilbert

Text problem
How can someone be an adopted sister AND a half-sister? I'm modifying the article text because, well, that just seems silly. Manticore 18:20, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

She was not adopted by Sara's father. She was adopted by their mother's previous husband. Half-sister is the closest approximation. Dennis M. Myers (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Walk of the stars
I've heard Melissa was youngest person on WoF. Can anybody confirm & include it? Trekphiler 00:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Ethnicity
There seems to be some confusion about the ethnicity (not the religon) of Melissa Gilbert in the original statement that she is of "Jewish descent". Adam Sandler's famous hit The Chanukah Song states "Melissa Gilbert and Michael Landon never mix meat with dairy. Maybe they shoulda called that show Little Kosher House on the Prairie?"

But she was adopted into a show-biz family. Her adoptive father's birthname was Paul MacMahon. (Why did he change his last name to Gilbert? Does anybody know? Was it for the same reason that Michael Keaton's real last name is Michael Douglas  -- see the first paragraph under "Trivia"?)  Melissa Gilbert's grandfather is apparently Harry Crane. Melissa's adoptive mother's name is merely listed as "Barbara Gilbert". Assume that the information is correct -- that Harry Crane is the grandfather, then one might conclude that Barbara's maiden name was Crane. There is a Barbara Crane at the IMDB, but she is not listed as the adoptive mother of Melissa Gilbert, nor is she listed as the daughter of Harry Crane. Let us assume that Barbara Gilbert was ethnically Jewish. From what I understand of Jewish tradition (which is not much), if your mother is Jewish, then you are considered Jewish. Sara Gilbert, her "adoptive" sister, is said to be Jewish. This doesn't make Melissa necessarily of "Jewish descent". Does anybody have info on Melissa Gilbert's biological parents? Other than IMDB and nndb (which both are volunteer web sites like the Wikipedia), can anybody get their hands on definitive sources (see  Verifiability)? 4.228.216.41 19:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

 * It gets more complicated as I read more. Melissa Gilbert's sister, Sara Gilbert, is a famous actress in her own right, having starred on the sitcome Roseanne.  Sara Gilbert's real name is actually Sara Abeles; she later changed her surname to "Gilbert "to match her adopted half-sister.  Sara's biological mother had divorced Paul Gilbert (nee MacMahon) and married Harold Abeles.  So is Harold Abeles Jewish, and this is why Sara Gilbert is considered Jewish?  And then by association, everybody assumed that Melissa is Jewish as well?  And Barbara Crane is not necessarily Jewish either? 4.228.216.41 20:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

 * No, Melissa says she's Jewish on her official site.
 * "I see that you celebrate Christmas, what religion do you practice?
 * My family is Jewish, but I carry a knowledge and respect for all religions. I don't practice one specifically. " Vulturell 22:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

 * But I have to admit that this is another of those interesting showbiz mysteries. Let's see what we have so far:
 * Sara Gilbert
 * biological father: Harry Abeles
 * biological mother: Barbara Crane?
 * I think both Abeles and Crane are Jewish, so Sara Gilbert is "fully Jewish",
 * Melissa Gilbert
 * biological father: Unknown? I'm assuming it's not Paul Gilbert/MacMahon.
 * biological mother: Are we sure that it's not Barbara Crane?
 * Vulturell 23:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

 * IMDB says that Melissa is Sara's "half sister". Which leads me to believe that Barbara Crane is indeed both Melissa's and Sara's biological mother. Barbara Crane and Paul Gilbert divorced in 1972 - not clear when they were married, but I guess it could have been after Melissa's 1964 birth? So her biological father is someone else - quite possibly someone that Barbara Crane never married? As for Barbara Crane being Jewish, it seems likely. Harry Crane seems like a typical early 20th century NY-born Jewish comedian and I would venture that his wife, Lilian, (Barbara's mother) was probably Jewish, too. So Melissa's statement that "her family is Jewish" makes sense. I think the biggest question is what happened to Melissa's biological father? Vulturell 23:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * NNDB also says Crane was Gilbert's "mother", while listing Gilbert as her "adoptive father". I really think it's likely Crane is her natural mother. Vulturell 23:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Barbara Crane Cowan is Melissa's "adoptive" mother. Apparently, she has been married at least three times (to Paul Gilbert, Harry Abeles, and currently Warren Cowan) and she's listed at imdb.com under her current name, Barbara Cowan .  Sara Gilbert is the biological daughter of Barbara and Harry Abeles.  She is not biologically related to Melissa, but they were raised by the same mother, so I guess that is what the "half-sister" is referring to. Yahoo has a fairly comprehensive bio on Melissa . 64.0.112.66 09:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Photo
Can't we get a better pic of her? Snoopy9 23:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC) snoopy9

Walk like a star?
How old was she when she made it to the Walk of Fame? Is she still youngest, or have the Olsen Twits replaced her? Trekphiler 04:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Redeye fix? Anyone?
I'm sure it wouldn't infringe on anyone's proprietary rights to fix the red eye in her photo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Landroo (talk • contribs) 15:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Relationship with Michael Landon
This from Michael Landon...
 * After the series ended, Gilbert stayed connected with Michael Sr. for the next 8 years, until his death. After Landon's passing, she named her son, Michael Garrett Boxleitner (1995), after him.

...contradicts what is in this article:
 * Melissa didn't have any contact with Landon after "Little House" ended during the 1983/1984 season. Seven years later, on May 9, 1991, when she saw a gaunt-looking Landon on The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson discussing his pancreatic cancer, she was compelled to finally telephone him. She had had no contact with Landon since his divorce scandal and he had never met her son, Dakota Brinkman, born May 1, 1989. Together they went to his Malibu home where he was, by then, bed-ridden. They spent the afternoon together. It was her opportunity to say "goodbye," something she did not get to do when Paul Gilbert suddenly passed away when she was 11. Exactly one week later, on July 1, 1991, Landon died. When Melissa gave birth to her second son (with second husband Bruce Boxleitner) on October 6, 1995, she named him Michael in honor of him.

So, which is it? --Elliskev 18:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Sara Gilbert
"Meanwhile, Sara, jealous of all the gifts and money Melissa was receiving starring on Little House and in television movies, also wanted to be an actress."

I find this sentence judgemental and inappropriate for this encyclopaedia. In Sara Gilbert's pages in Wiki it is only mentioned that she wanted to be an actress like her sister, and in IMDB they say that Sara was inspired by Melissa's career to become an actress herself. Both ways are far more neutral and appropriate and I suggest either one replaces this one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amj1967 (talk • contribs) 10:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Natural redhead?
Having just read Melissa's biography (Prairie Tale, 2009), I didn't see anything to indicate that Melissa is a "natural redhead". Every "natural" redhead that I know of was a redhead as a child (that goes for natural blondes also - one does not go from being a brunette child to a blond adult without assistance). Melissa wasn't a redhead until she was an adult, and she's had plastic surgery and other enhancements, so she probably would also color her hair. I think the "natural redhead" line should be removed, unless it can be documented by something Melissa herself has said. She was a brunette as a child, and her bio doesn't mention hair color being changed for the Little House on the Prairie series. The character she played was a brunette. Radiomo (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Photo
Please Leave the Photo of Melissa at Starlight on the profile instead of at the Emmy Awards, The Photo of her on stage is more current. And that photo of her at the Emmys is just ugly. --DefyingGravityForGood (talk) 18:58, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I understand that - because you created the photo - you take a special liking in it, but it's a very vague, unsharp and unclear photo that does not gave a clear image of what Melissa Gilbert looks like, the way the Emmy photo does. Detailled photos are more important than recent photos. Moviefan (talk) 13:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Link not working
Inline citation [26] reference link does NOT go yo the referenced/resourced article.

It goes to a news station's website.

Please check on this and correct if necessary. 68.231.71.119 (talk) 04:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Melissa Gilbert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927165256/http://www.guthrietheater.org/prairie to http://www.guthrietheater.org/prairie
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091003113807/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/133013-Gilbert_Blanchard_Lindsay_Massey_Loprest_Explore_a_Musical_Prairie_at_Paper_Mill_Opening_Sept._20 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/133013-Gilbert_Blanchard_Lindsay_Massey_Loprest_Explore_a_Musical_Prairie_at_Paper_Mill_Opening_Sept._20

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Gilbert for women's issues.
Partner with Michelle Thielen to work on sex trafficking issues in Austin, Texas? Deborah David (talk) 01:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Little House on the prairie..
I just wanted you to know we just watched little house on the prairie from 1-1 till the end... And we believe you did a fantastic job with that series...and just wanted to thank you for a job well done.... 192.183.163.56 (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Year of birth
Gilbert's year of birth was 1964. Not 1963. 86.130.217.201 (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

 * You need to cite a valid reliable source. See WP:BLPRS. BilCat (talk) 20:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

 * I've checked this source, an interview with the Archive of American Television, which is cited in the article. In it, Gilbert clearly states that she was born on May 8, 1964. This was changed to 1963 without comment by an IP user in 2022. In her book, which is also cited, she states that her birth father claimed she was born in 1963, so this may be where the confusion comes from. Since she was adopted when she was 24 hours old, it's unlikely her adopted parents got the year wrong. That's why we use reliable sources, and cite them so they can be verified, as sometimes it does get changed. BilCat (talk) 21:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

 * Actually, this has been changed on several occasions in 2022 by User:Nyoerg68, who has a history of BLP.sneaky vandalism. BilCat (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Melissa Gilbert


text:
American Theatre Wing

The American Theatre Wing (the Wing for short) is a New York City–based non-profit organization "dedicated to supporting excellence and education in theatre", according to its mission statement. Originally known as the Stage Women's War Relief during World War I, it later became a part of the World War II Allied Relief Fund under its current name. The ATW created and sponsors the Tony Awards in theatrical arts.

Stage Women's War Relief
Stage Women's War Relief was founded in 1917 to organize charitable giving in support of the war effort. Its founders, led by playwright and director Rachel Crothers, included the actress and playwright Louise Closser Hale and actresses Dorothy Donnelly, Josephine Hull, Minnie Dupree, Elizabeth Tyree and Louise Drew. The organization established workrooms for sewing uniforms and other garments (with total output totaling 1,863,645 articles), set up clothing and food collection centers, sold Liberty Bonds, and opened a canteen on Broadway for servicemen. It also presented benefit performances to raise money, including some held in a temporary "Liberty Theater" built outside the New York Public Library. In total, the group raised nearly $7,000,000 for the war effort.

The American Theatre Wing of the Allied War Relief
Shortly after the beginning of World War II in 1939, Rachel Crothers re-established the Stage Women's War Relief as a branch of the British War Relief Society in January 1940; this time adopting the name the American Theatre Wing (ATW). The revived organization's first and founding members included Mary Antoinette "Toni" Perry, Josephine Hull, Gertrude Lawrence, Theresa Helburn, and Vera Allen; with Louise Heims Beck serving as the organization's first Vice President. They began fundraising and organizing clothing donations to send overseas to the British people and to provide relief for European refugees in America. The organization initially worked from two rooms located inside 30 Rockefeller Plaza. In its first few months of operations they successfully lobbied businesses to donate supplies, with donations to the British people from American businessman including 1,000 coats for women and children and 4,000 lbs of coffee in addition to medical supplies and other clothing and materials. Others, encompassing both women and men, soon joined the ATW, including Tallulah Bankhead, Ray Bolger, Clare Boothe, Ilka Chase, Lynn Fontanne, Helen Hayes, Burgess Meredith, Cornelia Otis Skinner, and Clifton Webb. In 1941, with the entry of the United States into the war, the organization shifted its focus to the American war effort.

Stage Door Canteen
Under the leadership of Perry, Heims Beck, and Crothers, the Wing opened the Stage Door Canteen to entertain American servicemen in New York. The first canteen was in the basement of the 44th Street Theatre, and similar entertainment and dining venues were established in Los Angeles, Boston, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, Cleveland, Newark, and San Francisco, as well as abroad in London and Paris. In the US canteens, servicewomen were denied entry, although this was not the case in the European locations.

Lauren Bacall worked as a hostess in the New York Stage Door Canteen, and later recalled seeing Alfred Lunt and Lynn Fontanne washing dishes and serving coffee there. The Andrews Sisters were frequent performers. The Stage Door Canteen made its way into national popular culture with a 1942 weekly radio show and a 1943 movie called Stage Door Canteen.

The American Theatre Wing: post–World War II – present
After World War II, the Wing founded The Community Players to assist war veterans and their families on their return home. Co-chair of the Community Players was Katharine Cornell, who was active in the Stage Door Canteen.

With the close of the war, the Wing concentrated on holding seminars about American theater, and on funding numerous scholarship grants. It sponsored the First American Congress of Theatre (FACT) in 1947, but it is best known in contemporary times for having created, in the same year, The American Theatre Wing's Antoinette Perry Awards for Excellence in Theatre, or Tony Awards for short, which it still sponsors and which awards were themselves named for Perry, its co-founder and wartime chair, who had died in 1946. Heims Beck, who was later chairman of the ATW in 1950–1951, was responsible for overseeing the organization of the 1st Tony Awards.

The initial presentation of the Wing's Tony Awards program on radio and television was broadcast only locally in New York City. In 1967, it partnered with the League of American Theatres and Producers, now called The Broadway League, to present them on nationwide network television.

From 1965 to 1998,Isabelle Stevenson was the President of the ATW. After retiring, she served as chairwoman of the board of directors until her death in 2003. A special non-competitive Tony Award, for humanitarian or charitable work, is named in her honor, and is called The Isabelle Stevenson Award. It is Tony's equivalent to the Motion Picture Academy's Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award.

Sondra Gilman succeeded Stevenson as chair and Doug Leeds served as president from 2004 to 2008. When they completed their four-year terms, Theodore S. (Ted) Chapin assumed both roles from 2008 to 2012. In 2012, Tony Award-winning costume designer William Ivey Long became chair of the board until 2016 when current board chair, the Pulitzer Prize–winning playwright David Henry Hwang, assumed his duties. Angela Lansbury currently serves as honorary chairman and Heather A. Hitchens is president and CEO of the American Theatre Wing.

Besides the Tonys, ATW operates an array of programs to support its goals, including:
 * The long-running "Working in the Theatre" series of televised seminars with top practitioners in the field;
 * A free audio and video archive of theatrical seminars and discussions on the American Theatre Wing YouTube channel;
 * The Jonathan Larson Grants, supporting emerging creators of Musical Theatre
 * National Theatre Company Grants, aiding theatre companies and organizations who have articulated a distinctive mission, cultivated an audience and nurtured a community of artists in ways that strengthen the quality, diversity, and dynamism of American theatre.
 * SpringboardNYC, a college to career boot camp for actors
 * The Theatre Intern Network; a social and professional networking organization for Theatre Interns in New York City

title: American Theatre Wing


text: User talk:68.67.216.71

title: User talk:68.67.216.71


text:
Jeanette Arocho-Burkart

Jeanette Arocho-Burkart was a Sergeant E-5 in the United States Army.

Military career
Arocho-Burkart was an interrogator at the American prison in the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay. She is known as one of the female interrogators who used sexual humiliation, and sexual taunting, to break the will of her devout Muslim captives. The New York Daily News reported that she forced her captives to fondle her breasts. She also wore skimpy clothing to make the Muslim detainees being questioned stressed and uncomfortable.

In her most widely reported incident, Arocho-Burkart reached inside her pants, and smeared red dye on the face of her bound captive, telling him she was menstruating and that she was smearing his face with her menstrual blood. She then told her captives that the water in their cell would be turned off, so they could not wash off her menses. Muslims are supposed to pray five times a day. But Muslims are not allowed to pray if they are "unclean".

Arocho-Burkart was not charged over her choice of interrogation techniques. She did, however, receive what was later described as a "strong, immediate, verbal reprimand". A later story claimed she had received a 30-day suspension.

Civilian career
After Arocho-Burkart retired from the Army, she spent a year as a contractor with the Phoenix Consulting Group. During her stint with the company, Arocho-Burkart was reportedly handpicked by the Defense Intelligence Agency, which was then run by Maj. Gen. Barbara Fast, to teach "strategic debriefing." Fast was the most senior military intelligence officer serving in Iraq during the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse scandal. Arocho-Burkart was then hired as a civilian interrogation instructor at Fort Huachuca. Following the publication of her activities in Guantanamo, Arocho-Burkart was fired from her instructor job at Fort Huachuca.

title: Jeanette Arocho-Burkart