text:
User talk:Spin Boy 11

File:HotChip-OneLifeStand.jpg
I have tagged File:HotChip-OneLifeStand.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Seraphim ♥  17:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Image uploads
Hi there. As your talk page was very long, I've archived it for you, which you can do too if you like. The archive can be found here: /Archive 1. If you would like it put back the way it was, I'll happily change it back for you. I noticed you added an image to the One Life Stand article. Whilst your contribution is valued, there is a process we use that needs to be followed each time we upload a copyrighted image (like album or single covers). An image description that follows this system should look like this: File:Made in the dark.jpg. You can continue uploading copyrighted images but you will need to adhere to the following process:
 * Upload an image that is no bigger than 300px on any side
 * Add this template to the description:
 * Add a fair use rationale: Article Title
 * Add the source where you got the image from: "Image from: [url where found it]

You're already adding the source where you got the image and the licensing tag so it's really only the size of the image and the fair use rationale that are problematic. Image policies on wikipedia can be very confusing. If you would like any assistance, I will be happy to assist you or suggest places where you can receive assistance from someone else, if you prefer. If you would like to ask me anything please leave a message on my talk page. Season's Greetings to you! :) Seraphim  ♥  20:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Spin Boy 11! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Yorkie (musician) -
 * 2) Jamie Murphy (Space guitarist) -
 * this means if you don't reference the articles, they will be deleted soon. there is a biography of living persons purge in the works. I tried to find references for Yorkie (musician) but the name is so stupidly generic it is almost impossible. Dont ignore this notice, or the articles will be deleted. Okip (formerly Ikip) 01:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:OK Computer
Template:OK Computer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 05:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Userbox
Are you okay with User:Spin Boy 11/Userboxes/WP Flips being deleted since the wikiproject for The Flaming Lips has been deleted? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Surfing the Void
Hey, I beefed up the article above with some information I wrote in Klaxons, and added it to Did you know?. Hopefully we can get it on the main page. Look forward to working with you in the future. --SteelersFanUK06  HereWeGo2010!   18:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Article has been verified and is now waiting to join the queue. Any day now. --SteelersFanUK06  HereWeGo2010!   00:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:TheBees-EveryStepsAYes.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheBees-EveryStepsAYes.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bright Idea (song)

The article Bright Idea (song) has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:NSONG criteria for separate article. Needs to be incorporated into the album's article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 17:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kid A
Template:Kid A has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Futureismedieval.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Futureismedieval.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PTT-Animator.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PTT-Animator.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:User yoshimi
Template:User yoshimi, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User yoshimi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:User yoshimi during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:00, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Keane Logo2.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Keane Logo2.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox SpongeBob episode
Template:Infobox SpongeBob episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  02:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

New Zappa project
A new project from Frank Zappa has been proposed and we need as many users to join a possible. Go here to join. Thank You. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 01:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of On the Moon

A tag has been placed on On the Moon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. serioushat 06:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm Happy5214. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fish Hooks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -happy5214 11:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Template:Infobox television/doc. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=590234497 your edit] to Leo Abrahams may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * *2014:  [Present Tense (Wild Beasts album)|[Present Tense]] by Wild Beasts - co-producer, session

Disambiguation link notification for February 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Attack of the Mutant 50ft Kebab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:InsideNo9-AQuietNightIn.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:InsideNo9-AQuietNightIn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:InsideNo9-Sardines.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:InsideNo9-Sardines.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikilinks and genres
Hi, I noticed your edits here. You might want to take a look at WP:OVERLINK to get a sense for what should and shouldn't be wikilinked. In your edit above, you added wikilinks for months and years, which isn't helpful. I also noticed your additions of genre to Sanjay and Craig and here. Firstly, gross-out humor isn't a television genre. Secondly, any time you add a genre to an infobox, it should be clear from the context of the article, by sourced information, why that genre was added. We shouldn't be propagating the infoboxes with our personal interpretations of television/musical style. I also know that WikiProject Music is finicky about avoiding microgenre in articles, so you might want to double-check that the genres you are adding are suitable for the project and that they are supported by sourced content in the article. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a line. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikilinking
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
 * dates
 * years
 * commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
 * common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies for infoboxes.)

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony  (talk)  02:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CTC-MakeThisYourOwn.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CTC-MakeThisYourOwn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

File:TheDarkness-OneWayTicket.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheDarkness-OneWayTicket.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UncleGrandpalogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:UncleGrandpalogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  TLSuda (talk) 19:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hatful of Hollow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rik Mayall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Richardson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Copy/pasting content
Hi, please don't copy/paste content to Wikipedia as you did in this edit. Episode synopses that appear on other sites are considered copyrighted works. It is our duty to write our own episode synopses. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:59, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

inappropriate page move
I have reverted your move of Clarence (2014 TV series) as it is contrary to Naming conventions (television). Another editor has started a discussion on the article's talk page and I have explained why Clarence (animated series) is an inappropriate title there. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 21:43, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm Hoops gza. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Devo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hoops gza (talk) 23:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheTwang-LoveItWhenIFeelLikeThis.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TheTwang-LoveItWhenIFeelLikeThis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MuseKnightsofcydonia.png
 Thanks for uploading File:MuseKnightsofcydonia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pendleton Ward, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Over the Garden Wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Wander Over Yonder episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eric Rogers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Y (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dub. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:GetToHeaven.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GetToHeaven.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CTC-MakeThisYourOwn.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CTC-MakeThisYourOwn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dismaland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lush, Ed Hall and Jessica Harrison. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PullTigerTail-LetsLightning.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PullTigerTail-LetsLightning.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jujutacular (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Instant Wigwam and Igloo Mixture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Repost of Category:Triple albums
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 19:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CTC-MakeThisYourOwn.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CTC-MakeThisYourOwn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Littlest Pet Shop (2012 TV series)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Littlest Pet Shop (2012 TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Mike1901 (talk) 21:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Barnbrook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackstar (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dexys Midnight Runners, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orphaned Deejay Selek 2006–08, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited (How Does It Feel to Be) On Top of the World?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian McCulloch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Even Dogs in the Wild, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Jackie Buscarino) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Jackie Buscarino, Spin Boy 11!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Try and find additional reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spiders (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sampling. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suburban Rock 'n' Roll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suicide (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lil' Beethoven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neo-classical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Dr Greg. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Leo Baxendale, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Dr Greg  talk  21:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:BillyDilleytitlecard.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BillyDilleytitlecard.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 08:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:BillyDilleytitlecard.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:BillyDilleytitlecard.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 08:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hunky Dory
Template:Hunky Dory has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Michig. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Idles (band), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Michig (talk) 16:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple & Onion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burbank ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Apple_%26_Onion check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Apple_%26_Onion?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Run for Your Life (Beatles song), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tommy Scott (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tommy_Scott_%28musician%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tommy_Scott_%28musician%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BillyDilleytitlecard.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BillyDilleytitlecard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Adrian Borland. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Space-InvasionOfTheSpiders.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Space-InvasionOfTheSpiders.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GnarlsBarkleyWhoCares2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GnarlsBarkleyWhoCares2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Space-Neighbourhoodcd1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Space-Neighbourhoodcd1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Space-Neighbourhoodcd2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Space-Neighbourhoodcd2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox flash series
Template:Infobox flash series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AtWarWithTheMystics5.1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AtWarWithTheMystics5.1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Champion Versions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regal Records ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Champion_Versions check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Champion_Versions?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parliament (cigarette), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Parliament_%28cigarette%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Parliament_%28cigarette%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Sourcing
Hi, you have been here for some years now but as little as five months ago were doing this sort of thing. Are you still doing similar things? Have you ever read WP:V? - Sitush (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Glass Brother
Hello, Spin Boy 11,

Thanks for creating Glass Brother! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Glass Brother moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Glass Brother, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

SpongeBob sourcing
Hi, this is really late, but I've been wanting to ask you about your edits to the SpongeBob SquarePants article from last week - it's nice to see some new improvements to that page! I spent a lot of time a few years ago, correcting sections of the article that were improperly referenced, so I just wanted to double-check on your additions. I'm seeing where the "Oral History of SpongeBob SquarePants" source mentions storyboards being created on Post-it notes, but I did a "control +F" search for the term "storyboard" and didn't see anything in that source about storyboards being created digitally. I also didn't see anything about digital storyboards in the Brookshier interview, nor am I seeing anything in either source that could serve as the basis for the sentence, "Once the rough board is approved, a team of storyboard artists are brought in to clean up the director's drawings and enhance certain expressions and gags for the design and layout stage.".

Do you remember which sections of the sources you based those statements on? Again, sorry that I wasn't able to ask about this sooner (it's been a crazy week). --Jpcase (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey - since I never heard back from you, I finally went ahead and removed those statements from the article. If you ever have the time to check on where you found that information though, then feel free to restore your version of the "Writing" section. Just leave a note for me, explaining where the information came from. What you had was really well-written and seems likely to be accurate, so I didn't want to have to remove anything. But I need to make sure that everything in the article is properly sourced. Thanks. --Jpcase (talk) 14:32, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey - what's going on? I had hoped to hear back from you at some point, but you never responded.
 * I see that you've re-added some of this information back into the SpongeBob article. But you just used one of the same sources as last time, and it's still unclear to me whether that source actually contains any basis for the information that you've been adding. If you're getting this information from somewhere else and don't know how to add proper sourcing, then let me know, and I can help you out. I'm not trying to give you a hard time. What you wrote is pretty good, and I'd like to include it in the article. But I need to make sure that any new information added to the SpongeBob article is sourced properly. --Jpcase (talk) 17:49, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King's Mouth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mick Jones ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/King%27s_Mouth check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/King%27s_Mouth?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Merry

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Harry Merry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Tulsi Bhagat  ( contribs  |  talk ) 14:06, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Schlagenheim

The article Schlagenheim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "no evidence of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 23:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Suspended in Gaffa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 22:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BillyDilleytitlecard.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BillyDilleytitlecard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Carl Raggio IV
Hi. Unfortunately, the above-named deceased does not have an English Wikipedia article, and therefore cannot exist in the Deaths in February 2019 list, as there is a long-held consensual policy of no redlinks allowed beyond thirty days. Your entry had to be removed. Thanks. Ref (chew) (do) 15:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Glass Brother

Hello, Spin Boy 11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glass Brother".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glass Brother (August 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glass Brother and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glass Brother, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glass_Brother Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glass_Brother reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 14:08, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Category:Cartoons animated with Toon Boom has been nominated for discussion
Category:Cartoons animated with Toon Boom, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 21:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Look Around You
The inclusion of early 1980s features - such as the 1981 Top of the Pops theme tune - disprove your 'late 1970s' theory. There is also the Prince of Wales award scheme (1980s) and the hint of the discovery of a new disease (the early 1980s = AIDS). Please provide reliable citations before making edits.

(SangheetaPruyash (talk) 19:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC))

November 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mezzanine (album).  Rob van  vee  13:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Velocity : Design : Comfort. 'This is my final plea for you to source your edits. Several other editors have done the same but to no avail. You seem to think WP:V doesn't apply to you. Let's see if admin at WP:ANI agree with you.  Rob van  vee ' 15:46, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

ANI-notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread can be found here.  Rob van  vee  15:58, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jayron 32 16:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

 * I have blocked this account because, despite an astronomical number of warnings and requests to discuss your edits, especially those edits where you do not provide any sources of information, you have never acknowledged those warnings, discussed your behavior with anyone, or showed any signs that you intend to abide by Wikipedia policy by modifying your editing in response to this warnings. If and when you respond to myself here, or make any indication that you intend to do the following two things:
 * Acknowledge the receipt of all warnings and respond directly to any person who asks you a question or makes a comment regarding your behavior.
 * To agree to avoid adding substantive new information to Wikipedia articles without sources.
 * If you can agree to that, I or another admin can unblock this account. -- Jayron 32 16:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Glass Brother concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Glass Brother, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Glass Brother

Hello, Spin Boy 11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glass Brother".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional cat and dog duos

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional cat and dog duos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:28, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Fillmylittleworld-Original.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fillmylittleworld-Original.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * File:TheFeeling-FillMyLittleWorld7Inch.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:CB-WeAretheNight.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CB-WeAretheNight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Wives of the Beatles has been nominated for deletion
Category:Wives of the Beatles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Yorkie (musician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yorkie (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yorkie (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Bexaendos (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Space-GiveMeYourFuture.png
Thanks for uploading File:Space-GiveMeYourFuture.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Spin Boy 11


text:
Lusa submachine gun

The Lusa is a compact 9×19mm Parabellum submachine gun developed by INDEP of Portugal in 1983. Its name is derived from Lusitania, which was the Roman name for the Iberian region that covers present day central and southern Portugal and part of Spain. Although it was originally intended for military use, it was well-suited for law enforcement and ended up being marketed to bodyguards, VIP protection and special operations units.

Development
INDEP was a defense industry company owned by the Portuguese Government. In the early 1980s, INDEP manufactured the HK G3 and HK 21 in Portugal under license from Heckler & Koch. This allowed for the importation of German weapons manufacturing machinery and technical know-how, which stimulated development of new firearms designs in Portugal.

The Lusa marries some concepts from the HK MP5 and Uzi submachine gun without being too similar to either. The complete trigger housing is nearly identical to that of the MP5, however the other internals are greatly simplified. The bolt and carrier are one welded unit, and the action is a simple blowback, unlike the roller-delay system of the MP5. The Lusa fires from the closed bolt position in both semi- and fully automatic modes. However, the Lusa's barrel can be quickly changed without tools, like the Uzi. The Lusa uses a non reciprocating ambidextrous charging handle with no provision to lock the bolt to the rear, nor does the bolt lock to the rear upon an empty magazine. The rear sight is a simple diopter with screw adjustment. The body is formed from a sheet of stamped and welded steel.

The weapon never enjoyed widespread production, and the project was halted in 1992, at a cost of 2.5 million dollars. The MP5 soon replaced this weapon's intended usage in the Portuguese police forces. In 2004, INDEP sold all the dies, tooling, fixtures and manufacturing rights to Stan Andrewski, owner of Stan's Gunsmithing in New Hampshire, Jerry Prasser, owner of Recon Ordnance in Wisconsin, and Ralph Dimicco, co-owner of Riley's Gun Shop. The company was named LUSA USA.

The LUSA was approved for sale as a semi-automatic by the BATFE (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives) for the US civilian market. A select-fire model was available to law enforcement and government agencies, both foreign and domestic. Class III dealers could obtain one with the required LE demonstration letter.

As of 2006, LUSA USA planned to offer conversion kits in .22 Long Rifle, .40 S&W and .45 GAP but distribution of these never materialized. Choate side-folding stocks, sight rails and suppressors were available on a limited basis. Most models shipped with either a fixed stock or a collapsible stock.

Models
There were several available configurations for the semi-auto (SA) civilian version.
 * Lusa 94 - carbine, 16" barrel with faux suppressor (barrel shroud), collapsible stock. 30-round magazine.
 * Lusa 94 AWM - carbine, 16" barrel with faux suppressor (barrel shroud), fixed stock. Available with 30- or 10-round magazine.
 * Lusa SP89 - pistol, 6" unshrouded barrel, no stock. 30-round magazine.
 * Lusa A3 SBR - short barreled rifle, 6" unshrouded barrel, collapsible stock. 30-round magazine.

Magazines
A drawback of the Lusa is that it uses a proprietary magazine that is not widely available and is somewhat expensive. The magazines are all marked 30 rounds, but much of the company literature refers to them as having a 28-round capacity. This is probably because it is difficult to load a full 30 rounds and still insert the magazine against the closed bolt, since the Lusa has no provision to lock the bolt to the rear. The additional spring pressure makes it more difficult to fully seat the magazine. The 28-round recommendation is to ensure reliable magazine insertion. The magazines are of a double-stack staggered-feed type, feeding alternately from each side of the magazine.

End of production
In 2011, LUSA USA ceased production of Lusa pistols and carbines citing production costs. Recon Ordnance is currently producing parts for the NiteScout 9mm pistol and carbine, a design which is produced in Waterbury, CT by NiteScout LLC. The NiteScout bears a significant resemblance to the Lusa with some changes. Chiefly, it uses common 32-round Uzi magazines, an HK Navy style composite trigger group, an AR-style front sight and an HK-style rear drum sight. Further it eschews the early Lusa symmetrical charging handle for a left side cocking handle which can lock the bolt to the rear and be "slapped" forward to release, similar to the MP5 and HK91.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Lusa submachine gun


text:
Aaron Manby

Aaron Manby was a landmark vessel in the science of shipbuilding as the first iron steamship to go to sea. She was built by Aaron Manby (1776–1850) at the Horseley Ironworks. She made the voyage to Paris in June 1822 under Captain (later Admiral) Charles Napier, with Aaron's son Charles on board as engineer. Aaron Manby was then used by the Compagnie des bateaux a vapeur en fer to operate its service between Paris and Le Havre.

Vessel history
Launched in 1821, Aaron Manby was the first steamship to be built of iron. She was the brainchild of the eccentric but far-seeing naval officer Captain (later Admiral) Charles Napier, who had conceived the idea of a fleet of steamships for service on the River Seine. The ship was named after the master of the Horseley Ironworks, Tipton, Staffordshire, where she was pre-fabricated to a design jointly formulated by Captain Napier, Aaron Manby and his son Charles. She was then shipped in pieces to Rotherhithe on the Thames and assembled there. Of 116 tons burthen, the ship was 120 ft long. Her flat-bottomed hull was made of 1/4 in iron plate fastened to angle-iron ribs. There was one deck, of wood, and a bowsprit. The ship's distinctive profile boasted a single 47 ft funnel. The engine was of the oscillating type, designed and patented (British Patent No 4558 of 1821) by Aaron Manby. The paddlewheels: were 12 ft in diameter but only 2.5 ft wide, because the vessel's maximum beam was limited to 23 ft for service on the Seine. Defying the prevailing wisdom of the day, the iron-hulled vessel not only floated but made 9 kn and drew 1 ft less water than any other steamboat then operating.

After trials in May 1822, Aaron Manby crossed the English Channel to Le Havre under Napier's command on 10 June, at an average speed of 8 kn, carrying passengers and freighted with a cargo of linseed and iron castings. The ship proceeded up the Seine to Paris, where she caused a great stir and where she was based for the next decade. This has been claimed (incorrectly) as the first passage from Britain to France by steam ship. There had been shorter crossings by wooden steamers, but Napier's was the first direct steam crossing from London to Paris and the first seagoing voyage by an iron ship anywhere. After some further channel voyages the ship was used for pleasure trips up and down the Seine. On the failure of Napier's enterprise through bankruptcy in 1827 (after he had financed the building of five similar iron steamships) she was sold to a French consortium ("Compagnie des bateaux a vapeur en fer") who operated her on the River Loire until she was broken up in 1855. The use of iron plates for the hull, in place of wood, was widely copied in shipbuilding during the following decades. Napier had conceived the ship as a first step towards an iron warship, and in this sense Aaron Manby could be considered a direct ancestor of the Royal Navy's first iron frigate, HMS Warrior (1860), built the year of Napier's death.

title: Aaron Manby


text:
User talk:ForeFoe22

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, ForeFoe22! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Acetic  ' Acid  13:54, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:ForeFoe22


text:
Stableford

Stableford is a scoring system used in the sport of golf. Rather than counting the total number of strokes taken, as in regular stroke play, it involves scoring points based on the number of strokes taken at each hole. Unlike traditional scoring methods, where the aim is to have the lowest score, under Stableford rules, the objective is to have the highest score.

The Stableford system was developed by Frank Barney Gorton Stableford (1870–1959), to deter golfers from giving up on their round after just one or two bad holes. It was first used informally at the Glamorganshire Golf Club, Penarth, Wales, in 1898, and first used in competition at Wallasey Golf Club in Wallasey, England, in 1932. Between his membership of the Glamorganshire and Wallasey Golf Clubs, Stableford was a member at Anglesey Golf Club North Wales, for most of the 1920s.

Stableford can have the added benefit of speeding up the pace of play, as once it is no longer possible to score a point, players do not have to complete the hole but can simply pick up their ball and proceed to the next hole. It is a popular form of the game, especially at club level and particularly in the United Kingdom, as it is still possible to record a competitive score despite having the occasional bad hole.

Scoring
The number of points awarded on each hole is determined based on comparison of the number of strokes taken to a fixed score, usually par. This fixed score is then adjusted in relation to the player's handicap. Once players have taken two strokes more than the adjusted fixed score, they may abandon the hole and move on to the next, as it is then not possible to score any points on that hole. Because of this, it is still possible to be competitive even allowing for a few bad holes. At the end of the round, the number of points scored on each hole is totaled to give a final score. The winner of a Stableford competition is the player with the highest point total. Final scores may be modified for all players using the Competition Stableford Adjustment system.

In the United Kingdom, the fixed score would be adjusted as per the stroke indexes (SI) of the holes, starting at the lowest stroke index 1 hole, through to the highest, stroke index 18. For example, a 12 handicap golfer would increase the fixed score on holes indexed 1 through 12, a 24 handicap player would increase the score by two on holes indexed 1 through 6 and by one for the rest, and a plus handicap player would reduce the fixed scores starting at the stroke index 18 hole.

The number of points awarded per hole as specified by The R&A and the United States Golf Association are as follows:

This linear scoring version of Stableford is essentially the same as traditional stroke play where the maximum score for each hole is limited to a double bogey.

Modified Stableford
The standard Stableford system can be altered to use different point levels, commonly referred to as a Modified Stableford system. It is a maximum score system. For example, in professional golf, the following scoring table has been used at the Barracuda Championship on the PGA Tour.

This points scale encourages aggressive play, since the reward for scoring under par is higher than the penalty for scoring over par. The maximum score is two strokes over par; once a player has made his shot and is one stroke over par, he may concede, pick up the ball, take a double bogey, and proceed to the next hole without penalty.

Professional tournaments
Very few professional tournaments have used a Stableford scoring system.

The first PGA Tour event that used a Stableford system of scoring was The International in Colorado, although it used a modified version of the scoring system adapted for the skill levels of the professionals and to encourage attacking play. The event was cancelled in February 2007, after 21 years as part of the tour. The modified Stableford system returned to the PGA Tour at the Reno-Tahoe Open in 2012. Both events were held at high elevation.

On the European Tour, the ANZ Championship, which ran for three years from 2002, used the same modified Stableford scoring system as The International. The Investec Royal Swazi Open on the Sunshine Tour has used the same system since 2003. Two Champions Tour events also used the modified Stableford system briefly. They were the Royal Caribbean Classic in 2000 and 2001, and the Uniting Fore Care Classic in 2002. In the latter case, it was seen as a final attempt to save the failing tournament.

The American Century Championship, a celebrity tournament played at Edgewood Tahoe Golf Course in Stateline, Nevada, has used a modified Stableford scoring format since 2004. It is also at high elevation.

The Diamond Resorts Tournament of Champions Celebrity Division, part of the LPGA season opening event, has its celebrities participating in a modified Stableford system. The maximum score is double bogey.

title: Stableford


text: User talk:64.152.195.34

title: User talk:64.152.195.34


text:
Ascian language

The Ascian language is a fictional language invented by Gene Wolfe for his science fiction series The Book of the New Sun.

The language is spoken by the inhabitants of the “northern continents” of the future earth, the Ascians, who are enslaved by their masters (the Group of Seventeen) in a way much like the people of Oceania in George Orwell's book 1984.

The language
The Ascian language consists of two levels: On the low level it is an ordinary language, of whose syntax, grammar and vocabulary virtually nothing is known. The second level is more complex and unique.

Although Ascian is their mother tongue, adult Ascians do not understand plain Ascian sentences unless they are direct quotations from governmental propaganda materials, referred to as Correct Thought. Thus, in order to communicate, an Ascian has to know by heart thousands of these quotations (sentences) on many different topics.

As the northern continents are at war with the southern Commonwealth (where most protagonists of the books live), there are interpreters in the Ascian army to interrogate prisoners. These speak the language of the Commonwealth, but as they are unable to think outside the approved texts, what they say is merely literal translations of the Ascian approved sentences.

A very similar concept of a language is presented in the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "Darmok" from 1991.

Psychology
The reason for the Group of Seventeen to impose on their people this complicated concept of a language is much like Orwell's concept of Newspeak. In order to prevent the Ascians from ever developing critical thought (and subsequently inciting revolts), the language is limited as to make it impossible to express any such thought. This corresponds to the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis.

Nevertheless, Gene Wolfe suggests that in practice, the concept of Ascian does not work out entirely as intended. It is shown that intelligent Ascians are very well able to express, by means of approved sentences only, meanings that exceed those of the quoted sources. They simply quote sentences which have certain connotations, regardless of the actual meaning of the approved text.

Examples
In "The Citadel of the Autarch", the fourth volume of The Book of the New Sun series, there is a story told by an Ascian prisoner (who identifies himself only as "Loyal to the Group of Seventeen"), which is translated by people of the Commonwealth into our way of speaking. Some examples from this story are:

 * "In times past, loyalty to the cause of the populace was to be found everywhere. The will of the Group of Seventeen was the will of everyone." "Once upon a time…"
 * "The people meeting in counsel may judge, but no one is to receive more than a hundred blows." "He complained, and they beat him."
 * "How are the hands nourished? By the blood. How does the blood reach the hands? By the veins. If the veins are closed, the hands will rot away." "He left that farm and took to the roads."
 * "Where the Group of Seventeen sit, there final justice is done." "He went to the capital and complained of the way he had been treated."

The word "Ascian"
Although unfamiliar to most readers, this is not a word invented by Wolfe, nor is it a form of "Asians"; rather, it means 'dweller of the tropics', and it came into English by way of medieval Latin as an adaptation of ancient Greek ἄσκιος, literally 'without a shadow'. In the tropics, the sun is exactly overhead at noon twice a year, and at that time a person standing straight up will cast no shadow.

title: Ascian language