text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Chakvetadze

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was: Keep. Pretty easy call here. Tomer TALK 07:48, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

Anna Chakvetadze
del nonnotable tennis player. "World #28" IMO is hardly a distinctive feature. mikka (t) 19:22, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep: World #28 I think is particularly significant. She's been on the pro tour since 2003, and has won two ITF titles, one each in singles and doubles. See WTA profile here: . ITF profile here: . She's won more than US$234,000 playing tennis and she's just 18. If #28 in the world isn't enough to keep the article, what # would be? --Durin 19:40, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The article says she didn't win any titles, contrary to you claim. mikka (t) 20:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Please reference . On that page it shows she won two ITF titles as I noted above. That information might not be in the article, but it is true. --Durin 20:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Could you please indicate what world tennis ranking you would consider sufficient to justify inclusion and your rationale behind the metric? --Durin 20:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC) --Durin 20:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * keep, verifiable and factual. Trollderella 19:54, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a dumpster for everything factual in the world. I was born in January. It is verifiable and factual. And I am World #21. Shall I write an article about myself? mikka (t) 20:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * If you want to write an article, we could vote on it, my vote reffered to this article. I think that the article you are talking about would probably be deleted under vanity criteria, and more correctly belongs on your userpage. Trollderella 20:03, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep, professional sports figure. Hall Monitor 20:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've significantly upgraded the article now with table similar to that found on Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova, added some biography, significant career coverage, and external links. --Durin 21:03, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, number 28 in the world is certainly notable. Zoe 21:23, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: This article has been on Requested articles/sports since June 5. See . --Durin 21:46, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'd consider top #100 to be notable at least. feydey 23:55, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Her world ranking and track record make her notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 01:08, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. If a baseball draft choice is notable enough for an article without even turning pro, as was voted here not long ago, a professional tennis player who is competitive but not top-rank successful certainly is. Monicasdude 01:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable tennis player. FCYTravis 01:55, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable tennis player. *drew 01:46, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
The Tramp (film)

The Tramp is the sixth film directed by Charlie Chaplin for Essanay Studios, released in 1915. It was Chaplin's fifth and final film produced at Essanay's Niles, California studio. The Tramp marked the emergence of The Tramp character, a role Chaplin had played in earlier films but with a more emotional depth, showing a caring side towards others. The film also stars Edna Purviance as the farmer's daughter and Ernest Van Pelt as Edna's father. The outdoor scenes were filmed on location near Niles.

Plot
The film begins with the Tramp walking down the road, narrowly escaping two cars. Seeking refuge on a farm, he faces various humorous situations, including a hobo trading his sandwich for a brick. The Tramp comes to the aid of a farmer's daughter who is harassed by a hobo. As the story unfolds, the Tramp engages in farm work, gets involved in a tiff with a farmhand, and foils a planned robbery. However, upon realizing the farmer's daughter is already in a relationship, the Tramp decides to leave, leaving a heartfelt letter behind. The film ends with the Tramp walking away alone on the road he came in.

Cast

 * Charlie Chaplin as The Tramp
 * Edna Purviance as Farmer's daughter
 * Lloyd Bacon as Edna's fiancé/Second thief
 * Leo White as First thief
 * Bud Jamison as Third thief
 * Ernest Van Pelt as Farmer, Edna's father
 * Paddy McGuire as Farmhand
 * Billy Armstrong as Minister

Reception
The Tramp faced cuts by city and state film censorship boards, including a scene of Chaplin sitting in a sewage drainage pipe after burning his posterior, cut by the Chicago Board of Censors.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: The Tramp (film)


text:
User:Baitsell

Just another netizen.

title: User:Baitsell


text:
User:MiguelJoseErnst

Miguel José Ernst y Sandoval Moya nació en la Ciudad de Los Angeles de California. Su familia proviene de Nuevo Méjico y es descendiente de colonos españoles. Actualmente vive en Filadelfia, Pennsylvania.

 * Solemn Mass
 * High Mass
 * Sung Mass
 * Low Mass
 * Dialogue Mass
 * Missa Cantata
 * Misa Cantata
 * Ordinary of the Mass
 * Circumcision of Christ
 * Deutsche Singmesse
 * French Organ Mass
 * Sarum Use
 * Pasión de Gavilanes
 * The Red & the Blue
 * Hail, Pennsylvania!

title: User:MiguelJoseErnst


text:
Talk:Somma volcano

Terminology differences?
I just started this article. When I was looking at various web sources listing volcanoes, I was surprised to find that all volcanoes listed as "somma volcanoes" were either on the Kamchatka Peninsula or the Kuril Islands. Certainly there are somma volcanoes in other parts of the world (like Vesuvius, maybe?), but these are all listed as "stratovolcano" with a note that there is an associated somma. I think what is really going on here is aggregation of data from researchers with different terminological habits. Whoever it was that supervised the field work on Kamchatka and the Kuril Islands liked to use the phrase "somma volcano" much more than anyone else did.

If this is true, then my statement that "a number of the world's best examples of somma volcanoes are found on Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula and the Kuril Islands" is midly iffy. However, I can't claim sufficient expertise to settle this question.

— Nowhither 19:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Vesuivius is the prototype for somma volcanoes; it did give the name to the type after all. CFLeon 01:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Somma volcano


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mille passus

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 11:02, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Mille passus
This is the same information dumping of already deleted content on many previous vfds of Rktect entries, most of the article does not even deal with the Mille passus supposed measurement standard. Delete -- < drini | ∂drini > 19:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Now Im voting speedy delete per criteria G4 in WP:CSD. -- (drini|☕) 01:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

His last edit removed the most substantive part of the articleRktect 02:38, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * There is no reason to delete this page. It was only recently created and is still being edited. User drini regularly removes content making the page appear very different than it actually is.
 * It was rather a different page until you removed half the article. If you are going to slap a vfd tag on a page at least have the intellectual honesty not to remove its content and then pretend it is something it isn't. That's just slimey and its not the only page you have done that to.
 * Comment Rktect, considering the article history clearly shows that the only thing Drini did was add a vfd to the page, I think we can judge relative honesty here with a fair amount of ease. Caerwine 05:35, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I see, so all the red lines that indicate content the article previously pointed to on other pages that have been deleted along with their images and references and content don't count? Take a look at his contributions and you may get a better idea of what I think he's done.Rktect 06:04, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Even if true, and frankly I don't feel like spending the time to check on that right now, it doesn't affect this article in the least. If the information was vital to this subject, it should have been included in this article to begin with. What I see in the article is a bunch of messy writing that takes the POV that a particular theory about how certain length units originated is undisputed fact.  (Couldn't you at least spell league correctly?) The article dealing with that theory, Pseudoscientific metrology, can use the portions that can't be moved into the appropriate articles on ancient measurements that present the bald facts of how units within a particular system relate to one another without speculations into their ultimate origins. Caerwine 14:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Merge with Pseudoscientific metrology (which is currently subject to its own vfd, but seems likely to emerge with a consensus of keep) as this article appears to be just a recitation of various measurement schemes fitting under that article. Caerwine 05:35, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I have now replaced some of the material which belongs in this page referencing one of the routes for which the Roman Mile markers were actually preceeded by Egyptian 10 stadia markers that date back to the late bronze age.Rktect 20:02, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - the same content has previously been on Vfd in more than 20 cases: User:Egil/Sandbox/rktect. -- Egil 15:00, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Please list the articles which contain all the information this article has on the degree.
 * The mille passus and various referenced stadia are the most common divisions of a degree.
 * Which one, stadia, mille passus or degree was defined first?
 * When?
 * If this article is deleted tell me where else in wikipedia I can find answers to those questions.
 * You claim there are at least 20 places, quote an answer to those questions from any one.
 * If you can't do that then your claim is false and this article should not be deleted. Rktect 12:32, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

interesting and informative information and graphics.Rktect 21:25, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. *drew 01:51, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rather than argue that the page is worth reading I have added to its knowledge base a bit more
 * Delete as original research. --Carnildo 03:10, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * In what way is this extensively referenced article "original research"? Rktect 12:19, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete. Anything that can be salvaged should be merged with Pseudoscientific metrology, as per Egil and Caerwine above. I note that the irrelevant images have been reinstated since I deleted them. Ian Cairns 20:11, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * - comment: blank space left here for the obligatory riposte - Ian Cairns 20:11, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Comment While a single article about all this would be encyclopedic and desirable, it is abundantly clear that Mille passus is the wrong name for it and that Rktect is unable to write about it in a style that is comprehensible to others or to follow Wiki-standards of formatting and organization. Caerwine 17:05, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * There are hundreds of different ancient measures which each deserve their own article. Why don't you pick one, write an article in a style you feel is comprehensible to others and show me how you think it should be done? Rktect 18:41, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Why don't I? Two reasons. First, by and large, when considered in isolation, potential articles on the hundreds of ancient measures are little more that dictonary definitions that may be suitable for inclusion in the Wiktionary. It's only when considered as a system that they reach the level of being ecyclopedic instead of dictionaric.  Second, I don't have access to reliable sources that would enable me to write an article on this topic.  Caerwine 20:07, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Mettawee River

The Mettawee River (sometimes spelled "Mettowee River") is a tributary of Lake Champlain in western Vermont and eastern New York in the United States, passing the town of Granville, New York. The river is particularly good for rapids and kayaking.

title: Mettawee River


text:
Talk:Tagesschau (German TV programme)

Capitalisation
As far as I can tell, "Tagesschau" is capitalised, both in Germand and English, except in the domain name tagesschau.de. User:ThomasK disagrees, citing the German wikipedia (which capitalises it) and http://tagesschau.de (which capitalises it in the page title).

I do not see any evidence at all for the spelling tagesschau, and I'm going to revert to the capitalised spelling.

Prumpf 19:25, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Look to tagesschau.de. I corrected the article. The ARD tagesschau on the internet and on TV is not capitalised. --ThomasK 05:10, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

All German nouns, whether common or proper, are capitalised. "Tagesschau" is a German noun. Therefore... - RTB

 * Lower-case initial tagesschau and tagesthemen are the style, or branding, of these programmes -- as used in on-screen idents and on the programmes' own websites. That said, they could change back to Tagesschau and Tagesthemen as soon as the next graphic designer is appointed to the news department and decides on another makeover; the lower-case forms (logos) don't have to be (and, in my view, ought not to be) used in other, outside references to them. Just look at ARD's own online schedules, where they are shown as Tagesschau and Tagesthemen. -- Picapica 12:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Hard coded scripts
"Today, the 8pm bulletin remains the only flagship news programme on German television where newsreaders read stories directly from a hard copy of the script. " That's not true and hasn't been for a long time. All presenters read from the autocue, the scripts are only for backup. Some presenters (e.g. Susanne Daubner) like the script better, so you'll see here eyes wander between camera and script a lot. Jan Hofer on the other hand only reads the autocue. --91.16.188.134 (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

translation
IMHO the translation into english is wrong. Literally the term today show means in german "Heute Schau" which is very similar to a comedy show on the second german television (heute show). The correct translation of tagesschau must be something like "days show". (Tag = day) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.18.161.134 (talk) 18:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

 * The etymology of "Tagesschau" is given correctly: There was the "Wochenschau" running in cinemas before. The "Tagesschau", thus, is a kind of "Wochenschau" on a daily basis. As you might note here, "Wochenschau" is translated as "Weekly Newsreel". The connection is obvious that "Tagesschau" is to mean "Daily Newsreel", and to be honest, that's what I would put in the article. As it is, I'm changing the article to read "Day's Review", as it is close enough to both literal and intended meaning. -- DevSolar (talk) 11:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

TV prime time in Germany
The prime time movie on German TV always starts at 20:15 - right after the Tagesschau. Interestingly this is not only true for ARD and associated stations, but also for all other channels. The show is that significant.

Christian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.245.88.29 (talk) 10:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

 * That is mentioned in the article. The history behind that is that the Tagesschau already existed for ten years before the second German TV channel (ZDF) was added, and a whooping 32 years before the private channels entered the scene. There simply was no way around the 20:00 to 20:15 time slot being reserved for prime news. To this day, the few other stations with an own news format (SAT.1, RTL II, ...) also use that time slot for it. The only noteable exception is the ZDF with its "heute" ("today") format. -- DevSolar (talk) 12:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

 * Even the Deutscher Fernsehfunk moved its main news programme from 20:00 to 19:30 in order not to complete directly with Tagesschau. 2.127.208.169 (talk) 18:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Unrelated images and comments
The online version of the Tagesschau is notorious for putting unrelated and even fake images in their articles, mostly when it's about foreign countries since no one would notice anyway, like this image with stacks of newspapers: http://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/journalismus-china-101.html. One is about "Trump", one about the Soviet union releasing Jiang Jingguo to China, and another one about Jiang Jieshi's plans of retaking China. Clearly, these events don't belong to the same era. Other images aren't even taken in the country the articles talk about. Another fact is that there is supposed to be a comment section there, but this function is not consistently available.

Sometimes they think that the articles are too controversial, that discussions would get too heated. Even when the function is on, moderators have to read the comments first until they get published. Some neutral comments don't pass, but some hate comments do. It's very arbitrary. Comments sections also randomly close apparently due to moderators being overwhelmed by the number of comments. So if you write a comment and the comment section closes just minutes after you have already sent your comment, your entry will likely be lost in the "ocean" of comments. This isn't even a very used comment section, articles rarely have over 100 comments, but moderators just randomly decide when to relieve themselves of one discussion while being very active another one. Sometimes comments sections do reopen (provided it's still during the eight hours after the article has been published, provided the article can be commented at all), but your comment is definitely lost.

Sometimes, you point out some typos, content mistakes or wrong pictures, they will send you a private mail to thank you. Your comment doesn't get published, but they secretly fixed whatever was wrong, pretending it had been alright all along. However, no one can fix the awful style of those articles. Arguments are often structured wrongly and don't make sense so that a neutral-minded would not be able to tell how one point leads to a totally ridiculous conclusion. This should be somehow mentionend in the section "Media studies and criticism". Before you discard this as POV, please follow the Tagesschau's news coverage and comment sections, maybe use a translator to get a gist of what gets published. If you have some knowledge of German, sign up with a throwaway address and see how things work there. Of course, no official sources will ever talk about this, but that doesn't mean these problems don't exist. Everyone would be totally fine if there wasn't a comment section at all, but randomly selecting comments to depict an overall wrong public reaction is just distasteful. There is page where people publish suppressed comments (it's just copy and paste because unpublished comments still stay in your private message box) and many of them aren't even provocative. As said above, it's likely comments get lost due to the moderators' poor handling of the situation or they just don't like your opinions. There is really no swearing or other inappropriate content like on YouTube in this comments: https://tageszensur.blogger.de/. --92.74.29.137 (talk) 04:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Tagesschau (German TV programme)


text:
Enthusia Professional Racing

Enthusia Professional Racing (エンスージアプロフェッショナルレーシング) is a racing game for the PlayStation 2. It is the first sim racing game made by Konami.

Gameplay
Enthusia Professional Racing has five available play modes:

 * Enthusia Life (career mode)
 * Driving Revolution
 * Free Race
 * Time Attack
 * Versus Racing

Enthusia Life
As opposed to purchasing vehicles as in the majority of games in the sim racing genre, cars are unlocked by a roulette-style method after completing a race, which determines which opposing car in the race the player unlocks (although in this roulette, "no car" is also one of the possibilities).

Instead of purchasing parts to improve cars, a points-based system is used to determine upgrades. When enough of these "Enthu Points" (otherwise known as "Driver HP" in Japan) are obtained, a stat of the car (weight, power, or tires) is upgraded, up to three times each. The game also uses these points to keep track of collisions with walls and cars, or going off course, reducing the player's overall point count in each case. The more points are lost, the less points one gets to upgrade a car.

The driver can also be upgraded in the same way, with the points changing stats such as maximum number of Driver HP or the rate at which they are recovered after a race. If a player runs out of points during a race, the player has to miss the next race. Full HP can be restored by "resting", and a large amount is restored when changing a car.

Driving Revolution
In this mode players must attempt to pass through gates at the correct speed while accelerating, braking or keeping a constant speed. Points are gained for doing this correctly and enough points must be gained to pass on to the next level.

Features
Promotional material for the game emphasised the accuracy of the game's physics. To demonstrate the accuracy, a video was produced which shows a direct comparison between a Mazda MX5 being driven in Enthusia and its real life counterpart on the same course. It is among the demos that play when the game is left idle on the title screen.

The game's visual effects include a G meter termed "FGS" (which includes a representation of the car's tyres and their grip), a translucent "moving window" g-force effect and a speed blur effect in first person view.

The game's highly detailed car models include additional animated parts for specific cars, such as the retracting spoiler of the Bugatti EB110.

Featured race tracks (of which all but 2 - Tsukuba and Nürburgring Nordschleife - are fictional) include realistic foreground textures, and feature animations such as birds taking off, spinning wind turbines, flowing waterfalls, rivers and fountains, moving car traffic, sand being blown over dunes, and even a full aerobatic demonstration team emitting coloured smoke trails.

Enthusia accurately represents automatic transmissions, taking advantage of the Dualshock 2's pressure-sensitive throttle input to mimic real automatic transmission characteristics.

Enthusia can be used with the Logitech Driving Force, Driving Force Pro, Driving Force GT and G25 steering wheels.

Reception
The game received "average" reviews according to the review aggregation website Metacritic. In Japan, Famitsu gave it a score of one eight and three sevens for a total of 29 out of 40. IGN rated the game 7.2/10, suggesting that the game's enthusiast driving lifestyle would have been more accessible to gamers if it had come out in 2004, but its qualities are dwarfed by the fact that it was released around the same time as Gran Turismo 4.

title: Enthusia Professional Racing


text:
User:SchmuckyTheCat/to do

 * add images to Development stage
 * tables to List of airports in Delaware
 * replace an image in Bumbershoot
 * add image here: Twin Bridges, Montana
 * merge USB enclosure somewhere.
 * cull and de-linuxify USB flash drive
 * write an article about waste disposal in Hong Kong based on, http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/waste/waste_maincontent.html, since List of landfills in Hong Kong was thankfully, and correctly, deleted.

Something fishy

 * Special:Contributions/Quitepick
 * Special:Contributions/Trendsure

Two users with names that are 5letter/4letter random word combos. The first four contributions of each two are the same edits made to two different articles. This is setting off my BS alarm.

 * User:Majorlocal
 * User:Spanpoems
 * User:Usergreatpower
 * User:Hitswagon Image:Hong Kong Location.png

Privacy = Instantnood

Porkie Chopie? That kind of belligerence and that exact question has been made by Instantnood.

title: User:SchmuckyTheCat/to do


text:
User:64.107.114.4

Other IP addresses used by this editor include:

title: User:64.107.114.4


text:
User:64.107.114.99

Other IP addresses used by this editor include:

title: User:64.107.114.99


text:
Plating efficiency

Plating efficiency ("PE") is a measure of the number of colonies originating from single cells. It is a very sensitive test and is often used for determining the nutritional requirements of cells, testing serum lots, measuring the effects of growth factors, and for toxicity testing.

Plating Efficiency is the number of cells that grow into colonies per 100 cells inoculated. That is, it is the proportion of cells that attach and grow to the number of cells originally plated, expressed as a percentage. PE can be determined by the following formulae:
 * $$\mathrm{PE} = \frac{\#\, \text{cells on day 1}}{\#\, \text{cells plated on day 0}} \times 100$$

or
 * $$\mathrm{PE} = \frac{\#\, \text{colonies counted}}{\#\, \text{cells inoculated}} \times 100$$

The first method is more accurate.

Cell growth in culture generally undergoes a decline after plating, and graphically, PE is the global minimum (lowest point) of the growth curve at day one, after which growth rises again. The decrease in viable cells after plating is due to "anchorage-dependence"--cells must attach to the bottom of the culture dish.

Plating Efficiency is one of the parameters typically used to define growth properties of cells in culture. Other common parameters are doubling time ("DT") (which is an average of generation time ("GT")), and saturation density ("SD").

title: Plating efficiency


text: User talk:200.31.76.219

title: User talk:200.31.76.219


text: User talk:70.118.204.49

title: User talk:70.118.204.49


text:
User talk:Original Lewa Freak

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:
 * Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
 * Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
 * Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
 * Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
 * Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
 * Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
 * Use the Show preview button
 * Provide an Edit summary
 * Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
 * Create a User page
 * Be bold
 * Ignore all rules

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the  link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alf 19:28, 26 August 2005 (UTC).

Image Tagging Image:Bionicle8596sm.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bionicle8596sm.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 12:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Original Lewa Freak


text: Category:United States Office of Management and Budget