text:
User talk:Fcpolifan

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cursive 19:05, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Cavenaghi Edit
Fair enough, but you shouldn't have to emphasise really. For one it doesn't look as good to have that there, and it's also in the guidelines for editing player info boxes (underneath the appearances in the box itself). If they're making repeated wrong edits just give 'em a prod on their talk page :)

--Tiresais (talk) 09:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Our forum
Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 18:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Iancu.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Iancu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Echipaveche.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Echipaveche.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Di vaio g.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Di vaio g.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tozzi Fan 23:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:R poli.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:R poli.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TN_Blazon.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:TN_Blazon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex  22:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:R poli.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:R poli.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Echipaveche.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Echipaveche.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sebastian Petruş
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sebastian Petruş, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Article is unsourced, contains no assertion of notability and fails WP:ATHLETE; Petruş has not yet played in a fully professional league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:43, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cristian Danci
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cristian Danci, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Article about non-notable footballer who has not yet played in a fully professional league; fails WP:ATHLETE

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 19:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:FCU Politehnica Timişoara
I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Criteria for speedy deletion. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding to articles/subcategories that belong in it.

I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with db-author.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 18:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Fcpolifan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 20 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

 * 1) Alin Raţiu -
 * 2) Cristian Dancia -
 * 3) Adrian Poparadu -
 * 4) Valentin Velcea -
 * 5) Artur Pătraş -
 * 6) Ionuţ Matei -
 * 7) Alin Artimon -
 * 8) Alexandru Bădoiu -
 * 9) Dan Găldeanu -
 * 10) Silviu Bălace -

 * 11. Rareş Soporan
 * 12. Alexandru Popovici (Romanian footballer)
 * 13. Mircea Rus
 * 14. Eduard Cristian Zimmermann
 * 15. Sreten Stanić
 * 16. Iasmin Latovlevici
 * 17. Cristian Silvăşan
 * 18. Sorin Rădoi
 * 19. Marius Popa

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Poli - Steaua.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Poli - Steaua.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Poli-juve.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Poli-juve.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kit right arm violetshoulders.png
Thank you for uploading File:Kit right arm violetshoulders.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kit left arm violetshoulders.png
Thank you for uploading File:Kit left arm violetshoulders.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kit body violetvertical.png
Thank you for uploading File:Kit body violetvertical.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Romania
--Codrin.B (talk) 04:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of FC Politehnica Timișoara

The article History of FC Politehnica Timișoara has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable and fully unreferenced history of a club, where the club's article already has a sourced history section.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 08:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of History of FC Politehnica Timișoara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of FC Politehnica Timișoara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/History of FC Politehnica Timișoara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello
I have seen you improved seasons or parts of articles in Cupa României and List of Cupa României finals. Would you like to help to improve other missing seasons? I already start with the first ones. Thank you!Alexiulian25 (talk) 02:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

and Liga II seasons, to create.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 01:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mircea Axente

A tag has been placed on Mircea Axente requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

please see https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mircea_Axente. There is another former football player under this name.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Silenzio76 (talk) 14:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fcpolifan


text: Talk:Space (English band)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Space (English band)


text:
Marienwerder (disambiguation)

The German place name Marienwerder refers to:

 * Marienwerder, the German name of the city Kwidzyn, in northern Poland
 * Mareinwerder, the German name of the village Załęże, in northwestern Poland
 * Marienwerder (region), a former government region of Prussia
 * Marienwerder (district), a former district of Prussia
 * Marienwerder, Brandenburg, a community in the administrative district of Barnim, Germany
 * Part of the urban district Herrenhausen-Stöcken in the city of Hanover, Germany

title: Marienwerder (disambiguation)


text:
Talk:List of Amtrak routes

Scheduled Service Time
Anyone want to collaborate on adding a column with scheduled service time to this table? Theblindsage (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Untitled
There are some trains that were listed on other websites for which I cannot find any corraborating info. I'm going to place these here until further info/confirmation is found. Please remove items from list that you know are not valid Amtrak Routes.

 * Encore (Midwest?)
 * Gulf Wind (Was an L&N Train)
 * Indiana Connection
 * Lake Shore (NOT LAKE SHORE LIMITED) VIA Montreal, QC-Toronto, ON  Montreal - Toronto
 * La Salle CN; VIA Chicago, IL-Toronto, ON;Sarnia, ON-Montreal, QC
 * Marquette (Show the Pere Marquette RR Operated this Train Chicago, IL-Grand Rapids, MI; Amtrak now had the Pere Marquette)
 * South Breeze
 * Spirit of America
 * Texan
 * Weekender
 * West Virginian
 * Willamette Valley (Oregon)
 * Wishbone

shows the Lake Shore as the old name for the Lake Shore Limited. The 1991 Trains article agrees. That timetable also shows the West Virginian. --SPUI (talk) 10:51, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

I've gone through a bunch of info and added start and end dates for most of the trains outside the corridors (Northeast, Empire, Keystone, Hiawatha and Cascade). User:SPUI/Amtrak shite has some compiled info. --SPUI (talk) 19:14, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

800-899
-- I have a summary of the ownership of Amtrak's 21,767 route miles here-

http://www.trains.com/TRC/CS/forums/569629/ShowPost.aspx

Dale

nanaimo73@shaw.ca
 * Dale, that's an excellent work you did there. Rhallanger 00:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

New Orleans East?
A 1986 LADOTD map shows four Amtrak routes, all from New Orleans - to Slidell via Southern, Hammond via ICG, Schriever, New Iberia, Lafayette and Lake Charles via SP and New Orleans East via Seaboard. Does anyone know details on the New Orleans East route? Is this referring to the Gulf Coast Limited (and thus in error, as that was discontinued in January 1985)? Or did Amtrak operate a commuter train there? --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 07:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Trains that exist but lost their number
There are some trains listed, especially on the Northeast Corridor, that lost their names but still exist. Those need to be marked, but how to do that in an overly-long article? --plaws 21:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Ridership per mile?
Means nothing. What you want is revenue passenger miles since, particularly on longer routes, seats can turn over multiple times. --plaws (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Whoa
Quite long passenger routes you have, anything over 500 miles would probably be classed as long-distance here if such a class would be regulated. 85.76.37.10 (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Keystone Corridor
I've separated the Keystone Corridor section into two tables - the Harrisburg-Philadelphia local services that are now under the Keystone Service brand, and Pittsburgh-Philadelphia services (now only the Pennsylvanian) that general didn't provide local service east of Harrisburg. I think this is more clear, but could be convinced otherwise. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I like it, but we now have some duplication between this section and Northeast–Midwest. They could probably be separated based on whether the service continued west of Pittsburgh, though the Pennsylvanian's brief extension to Chicago poses a problem. Mackensen (talk) 02:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I 'm afraid there's always going to be some degree of duplication no matter how you divide it up. Even discounting the proper long-distance trains that run express on the NEC, you have a number of trains that offer local service on the NEC and also go elsewhere. Carolinian, Vermonter, pretty much every NYC-HBG train that's existed, the Virginia extensions of Northeast Regionals, etc. I think you end up having to make some really awkward judgement calls about what list to put things on if you try to restrict it to exactly one listing of each train. What about that Downington Metroliner that ran 80% of its route miles on the NEC? What if the Lynchburger gets extended to Bristol as proposed - it would be almost as long as the Carolinian, but still may remain under the Northeast Regional brand. Amtrak seems to always have an exception for every rule. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Valley Flyer
Should the Valley Flyer trains be listed separately? Or should we change the length of the Hartford Line trains to 98 miles to include the two round trips to Greenfield, MA?Mirza Ahmed (talk) 07:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Keystone route in 1972
In the January 1972 Amtrak route guide*, there is a route called "Keystone" pg 52, top row, train #43, and pg 53, bottom row, train #42. It's a New York to Philly route. I'm mapping route changes based on the printed schedules, so I have no further info than what appears there. Not comfortable just stuffing it into the chart. Lindaniel (talk) 23:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * From the Museaum of Railway Timetables
 * Thanks for the tip. Looks like we already have it listed - see the second chart under #Keystone Corridor. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The earliest in that chart is 1980. The Keystone I reference is in 1972. I'm now working on 1973 guides, and this Keystone has only been listed in the January 1972 Amtrak guide. (oops, forgot to sign in Lindaniel) 74.76.173.30 (talk) 03:13, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you're looking at the first chart. The 1972 iteration of the Keystone is in the second chart, right under the Duquesne and Fort Pitt. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I did further searching in my stuff, and found ...that your answer above is "my" Keystone. Searched on Duquesne, and there it was. I'm glad I didn't try amending the page before asking about it. Thank you for your patience. Lindaniel (talk) 22:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Colors in table
There are multiple dates in the various tables which have a red background, but as far as I can tell there's nothing in the article itself that explains what this use of color means. This seems inconsistent with MOS:COLOR's requirement that colored backgrounds should not be used except in conjunction with accessibility tools or footnotes to make it clear what the use of color is meant to symbolize. Rfwang4 (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That's odd. It seems to me that the colors indicate either a) the route was operated by Amtrak on May 1, 1971, the date Amtrak began operations, or b) the route is currently active. I don't understand why both cases would use the same color. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That appears to have been around since 2005, could use an update perhaps.  Cards   84664   21:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, 2005, when VHS was still a thing and I was in elementary school. That was probably advanced technique back in 2005 to have the colors like that. I'd recommend changing the present services color from red to green. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I realize that @Trainsandotherthings have our differences over station notability but there's no need to make some us feel older than we are :). Anyway, the red background denoted (for the start date) trains that Amtrak assumed control over on May 1, 1971 and (for the end date) trains that are still running. At one time, I believe, the reporting mark of the pre-Amtrak carrier was also indicated in the start date. I agree that in its current form it adds nothing. If a color key is needed or useful, we should do something similar to what's implemented at List of MBTA subway stations. Mackensen (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Edit: yes they were, see for example. Mackensen (talk) 22:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

How's this grab folks? Mackensen (talk)
 * Sure, and maybe add a new column for predecessor operator, similar to Conrail.  Cards   84664   23:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:List of Amtrak routes


text: File:Spaceghost.jpg

title: File:Spaceghost.jpg


text:
Category:Spanking implements

Instruments for inflicting spankings.

title: Category:Spanking implements


text:
User talk:Skamholz

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Edcolins 19:07, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Wikipedian patent lawyers
Hello, Skamholz --

I see that you're a patent attorney. I've recently created the category Wikipedian patent lawyers. I'm inviting you to add this category to your user page. You can do this by adding   to your user page.

You may also be interested in the categories "Wikipedian lawyers" and "Wikipedian intellectual property lawyers" as well.

Terry Carroll 18:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum
Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Skamholz