text:
User talk:Alibadawi

Syria
Welcome to wikipedia!

Have you ever been to Syria?

Guy Montag 03:05, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Kaafirphobia
Hi. The removal of kaafirphobia has been agreed by two admins. Please do not add it again. __earth
 * Hi Earth! So, only two admins 'agreed' but not a two-thirds majority? Also, you have not named them either here or in Kafir Talk Page. In that case, I feel this term ought to be there. You are invited to discuss this here or on the Kafir Talk Page but please do not remove it as there is evidence of 31 hits from Google. This implies it is notable. Alibadawi 04:48, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * If you actually read the talk page and check the history page, you'll realize of whom I'm talking about. (user:Dbachmann and user:Shem Daimwood). Also read Votes_for_deletion/Kaafirphobia. More over, if you actually check the search, many of it are repeating search and in the end referred back to Wikipedia's page. Again, pelase read the talk page thoroughly. __earth 04:57, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * So, Dbachmann is an admin but anyway, let my quote what he said to you, Earth:
 * >I really don't see why the term needs to be suppressed,
 * >seeing that this article is still very short and badly
 * >in need of more material. That's just my opinion, of
 * >course, and I'll gracefully yield to community
 * >consensus :) dab (ᛏ) 09:16, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

 * And you, Earth replied to Dbachmann:
 * >Alright then, but could we just remove the reference to
 * >the two sociologists? I'm convinced they are fake since
 * >the university's dean itself, according to a blog,
 * >doesn't recognize them. __earth 09:20, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

 * So, I take it that if 'we just remove the reference to the
 * two sociologists' the Kaafirphobia section can be retained,
 * right?

 * Feel free to give me your feedback to what I said so it may
 * yield community consensus. Thank you. Alibadawi 05:10, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

 * I see, sorry, I didn't realize we have Colin chee (talk • contribs) adding his own neologism,

and playing games on geocities and blogs; I suppose he'll have to provide better references then, like mention of the term on the "Social Centre on Racism and Xenophobia" website, which have adopted the term according to his claim. dab (ᛏ) 09:26, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

 * He added that after realizing it violates Wikipedia's not original reseach policy. Moreover, when I said reference, it includes removing the source, not merely the "sociologists" names. (i.e. that geocities site which is constructed by the same user that added the term in the first place) __earth 05:22, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

 * I am not sure of your claim that 'he added that after realizing it violates Wikipedia's not original reseach policy'. That aside, if I remove the source (ie. Geocities web site) do you agree to retaining it? The term as I see it is a useful term describing radical Islamists and moreover a Google will show numerous web sites other than Wikipedia have this term. So, adding it to Kaafir article will not constitute original research. Alibadawi 05:36, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Not anymore. It obvious the term is of relatively new invention by some fake sociologists of no significance. My suspicion that there is socketpuppetry involved also strengthens my stand. And no, most of Google searches link back to Wikipedia (most of the searches are blogs). That means all those blogs quote Wikipedia. If we use those blogs to justify this term, we are commiting logical fallacy (circular reasoning). In any case, an admin has overruled you and please, no more revert. Please read the talk page next time before editing.__earth 05:41, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

 * Why 'not anymore' ? Also, you cannot call someone fake or allerge socketpuppetry is involved without evidence as this will be a violation of Wikipedia policy. Please provide the evidence of your claims. The onus is on you not me. The reason why I stand for inclusion because nationmaster includes entry on Kaafirphobic, which is totally different from Wikipedia. So, I await you to prove to me your claims. Thanks. Alibadawi 05:51, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

 * I said I suspect of socketpuppetry, just like what happened at the earlier vfd. I didn't accuse you of anything, yet. And you said nationmaster includes it for an entire different reason? You must be kidding. If so, why the entry is totally similar to Wikipedia's deleted version? Are you an admin of nationmaster? If you are, then send wikipedia an genuine email along with its header. If you are not, don't make false claim like what Colin Chee is doing. __earth 06:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

 * Your claim that the earlier vfd had socketpuppetry is not true otherwise nationmaster would not include the entry Kaafirphobia. What is deleted on Wikipedia cannot be compared, and no, I am not an admin at nationmaster but I just mentioned nationmaster article is different from Wikipedia, which means it can be used as reference. Alibadawi 06:15, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Look up the term Mirror (computing) if you are unfamiliar with it. Well, since the issue is being brought up to sysop, I hope this disagreement will end soon. __earth 06:27, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

3 Revert rule
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. Mark1 07:34, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I fully agree with you that nobody should break the three revert rule because breaking the rule means anarchy in Wikipedia. Garywbush 04:40, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * A proof of sockpuppetry? Check this history . why did you say that gary?__earth 10:11, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Userpage grammar fix
Thanks for fixing the grammar error on my userpage! Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 16:27, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

Private Messages
You may freely use this space for your private messages to me. Give me your feedback, positive or negative or neutral. However, please be advised that I do not reply to trolls. Alibadawi 05:41, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Request for Comment
Please be aware that I have made a request for comment about your relationship with User:Garywbush. If you want to defend yourself, please go to Requests for comment/Garywbush Robdurbar 13:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alibadawi


text:
User talk:Markvs88

What?
What, there's been no posting here since 13 December 2021, and also no recent edit contributions by Markvs88?

I just read the (archived copy of) "Editing Wikipedia Isn't Easy" or linked from ur userpage... that was good writing in 2011 IMHO by the Hartford Courant journalist and you must have served as a very good interviewee, giving her good guidance. :) --Doncram (talk,contribs) 11:32, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

And, your 2012 mention of An example of a change without consensus as "This is a great example of how one side totally ignoring the other still leads to a change going through." is apt. I certainly noticed and didn't like the inane category name change being implemented everywhere, but I don't think I ever found my way to that very unpleasant CFD. Seems like time to ignore that, and re-establish categories for the churches (while letting categories of church buildings continue, i suppose, but revisiting of its members to make sure that they (or almost all of them) are also in categories of churches). I dunno, this is maybe reflective of my attitude and approach about bad WP decisions and processes.

Funny I was browsing in old stuff, which brings me to here, but which also related to editor BHG (nominator of that CFD, and deletion nominator for wp:ITSACASTLE essay who, at the time, I experienced as, well, unhelpful). Too bad you have not been contributing recently! The NRHP wikiproject has seemingly plateaued, by the way, and the percentage of NRHPs which have been "articled" has actually been declining slightly, given delistings of ones having articles and new NRHP listings outpacing v. modest new article contributions, as can be seen in wp:NRHPPROGRESS history. Wikipedia is going downhill? :( --Doncram (talk,contribs) 11:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WestportCTseal.gif
Thanks for uploading File:WestportCTseal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RidgefieldCTseal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RidgefieldCTseal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of The Daily Campus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Daily Campus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Daily Campus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chances last a finite time (talk) 14:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MonroeCTseal.gif
Thanks for uploading File:MonroeCTseal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WashingtonCTseal.gif
Thanks for uploading File:WashingtonCTseal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Darien, Connecticut (town seal).gif
Thanks for uploading File:Darien, Connecticut (town seal).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Markvs88


text:
Aaron Chorin

Aaron Chorin (אהרן חארין; August 3, 1766 – August 24, 1844) was a Hungarian rabbi and pioneer of early religious reform. He favored the use of the organ and of prayers in the vernacular, and was instrumental in founding schools along modern lines. Chorin became a pivotal figure for reformers, although he himself still operated inside a traditional framework. He also interested himself in public affairs—he took an active part in the efforts for Jewish emancipation, and was very influential with the state authorities.

Early years
Chorin was born in Hranice (Přerov District), Moravia (then part of the Holy Roman Empire, now in the Czech Republic), in 1766. At the age of fourteen, he studied in the yeshivah of Rabbi Jeremiah Mattersdorf in Mattersburg, Austria, and two years later at Prague in the higher Talmudical school of Ezekiel Landau. Here he also learned German. Chorin married on December 26, 1783, and entered commerce; but his business career being unsuccessful, he accepted the post of rabbi at Arad (then in the Kingdom of Hungary, today in Romania) in the spring of 1789, which he occupied till his death.

His First Work
In 1798, Chorin published his first pamphlet, Imre No'am (אמרי נועם Words of Pleasantness), in which he argued that as the sturgeon had scales it was permitted as food according to Scripture. His opinion, although following that of Landau and other authorities, was strongly opposed by Mordecai Benet and his partisans. Rabbi Isaac Krieshaber of Páks wrote a refutation, Maḳḳel No'am (מקל נועם Staff of Pleasantness), which called forth a second pamphlet by Chorin, Shiryon Ḳasḳassim (שריון קשקשים Armour of Scales), (Prague, 1799).

By his determined opposition to the traditional usages in Hungary, Chorin incurred the hostility of most of his colleagues. In the spring of 1802 he journeyed to the Somogy district. The favorable impression which his sermons made upon his Jewish hearers there induced him to consider himself as the future rabbi of this district, and on the title page of a pamphlet he published he assumed this title. The rich and prominent Moses Lakenbacher, president of the congregation of Nagykanizsa, promised Chorin his influence with his brethren of the district; but when Lakenbacher became aware of the strong opposition of the conservative party against the reformer he soon turned against him.

Opposition by the Orthodox
At Prague in 1803, Chorin published  ' Emeḳ ha-Shaweh (Vale of the Plain), a work divided into three parts. The first and most important part, Rosh Amanah (Head of the Perennial Stream), in which he granted to the spiritual guides of the people authority to modify the traditional laws and adapt them to the requirements of the time, led to much opposition to him. Chorin treats of Maimonides' thirteen articles of faith, and gives evidence of knowledge rare among Hungarian Jews of his time. Next to the Halakha, Chorin also interpreted the Aggadah in a philosophical way. This method he applied in like manner to the Zohar, which he, far from all mysticism, considered as a rich source of speculative knowledge. This view referred only to the theoretic or intuitive, and not the practical, Kabbalah, the belief in which he considered as contradictory to sound reason. At the beginning of this book are printed the approbation of Rabbi Moses Münz and a eulogistic Hebrew poem of Rabbi Moses Kunitz. This work gave great offense to the Orthodox party, which thwarted the publication of a second edition, for which Chorin had prepared many corrections and additions. Benet wrote to the Arad congregation that the book contained heresies and must be burned. The congregation, however, stood by their rabbi; but some of its members sided with Benet, and their leader, a rich man, publicly insulted Chorin while he was preaching. The Arad board now applied to Münz to certify that the book contained no heresies. Having given his approbation to the author, Münz was in a great dilemma, since he was urged by the Orthodox party to condemn Chorin and to inflict upon him an exemplary punishment. He concluded to yield to the insinuations, and on September 1, 1805, he invited two rabbis to come to Óbuda to form with him a tribunal before which Chorin was summoned. The session of the court was prolonged to the next day, but then Münz failed to appear.

Sentence Pronounced
Samuel Butschowitz, rabbi of Aszod, now pronounced sentence that "Chorin must retract the contents of his book. Should he refuse to do so, his beard will be cut off as a penalty for his heretical transgressions." Thereupon Chorin, whom the populace had stoned in the courtyard of the synagogue, declared that he subordinated his views to those of the theologians of his time, and desired that his book be suppressed. The court also decreed a reduction of Chorin's salary, but the board of his congregation indignantly rejected this decree. Chorin appealed to the imperial government which, on June 24, 1806, annulled the judgment and condemned the leader of his adversaries at Arad to pay the expenses of the lawsuit; the same was also to be punished for his scandalous conduct on Shabbat Shuvah, 1804. Chorin declared that he forgave his adversary, and declined his claims for compensation of the expenses. To avoid further trouble, he determined to give up writing.

Attitude Toward Reform
The Reform movement among the Jews of Hamburg met his hearty approval. In Ḳin'at ha-Emet (Zeal for Truth), a paper written on April 7, 1818, and published in the collection Nogah ha-Ẓedeḳ (Light of Righteousness), he declared himself in favor of reforms, such as German prayers, the use of the organ, and other liturgical modifications. The principal prayers, the Shema', and the eighteen benedictions, however, should be said in Hebrew, he declared, as this language keeps alive the belief in the restoration of Israel. He also pleaded for opening the temple for daily service. Influenced by Münz, Chorin recalled this writing on February 19, 1819; but a year later he published Dabar be-'Itto (A Word in Its Time), in which he reaffirmed the views expressed in Ḳin'at ha-Emet, and pleaded strongly for the right of Reform. A German translation by Löb Herzfeld appeared at Vienna. This directed upon him the attention of the progressive party in Austria and in Germany. Michael Lazar Biedermann, a prominent man, proposed the appointment of Chorin at the new temple to be erected at Vienna; but the government being opposed to it, Isaac Noah Mannheimer was elected instead.

Consulted by Baden
The government of the grand duchy of Baden asked Chorin (on February 3, 1821), through the banker S. Haber, for his opinion about the duties of a rabbi, and about the reforms in the Austrian states. Chorin answered by writing Iggeret Elasaf, or Letter of an African Rabbi to His Colleagues in Europe, which was published by M. I. Landau (Prague, 1826). In it he stated that the Torah comprised religious truths and religious laws, the latter partly applicable only in Palestine, partly obligatory everywhere. These may be temporarily suspended, but not entirely abolished, by a competent authority, such as a synod. Only ordinances and precautionary laws which are of human origin may be abrogated in conformity with the circumstances of the time. As for mere customs and usages (minhagim), the government, after having consulted Jewish men of knowledge, may modify or abolish them; but in no other way may it interfere with religious affairs. Chorin also pleaded for the establishment of consistories, schools, a theological seminary, and for the promotion of agriculture and professions among the Jews. Some of these ideas he carried out in his own congregation, which included a great number of mechanics. He succeeded in founding a school, and introducing liturgical reforms into the synagogue; even an organ was installed at his instance. He permitted the eating of rice and pulse during the days of Passover.

To his theory of a synod regulating and modifying Jewish laws and customs, Chorin always adhered. In his Treue Bote (Prague, 1831) he declared himself against the transfer of the Sabbath to Sunday, but expressed the opinion that, considering the requirements of our time, synods might mitigate the severity of the Sabbatical laws, especially in regard to traveling and writing.

In another treatise, Hillel, which appeared at Buda in 1835, he interpreted the prophetic promises about the reuniting of Israel to signify the establishing of a supreme religious authority at Jerusalem. Hillel, in the form of a dialogue, and other contributions of his pen were published in the fourth volume of Bikkure ha-'Ittim. In 1819 he wrote Abaḳ Sofer (The Dust of a Writer), published by Landau (Prague, 1828), containing glosses about Yoreh De'ah, Eben ha-'Ezer, the phylacteries, an exposition of Proverbs I.10, et seq., and two riddles.

In his Yeled Zeḳunim (Child of Old Age), (Vienna, 1839), partly in Hebrew, partly in German, he again strongly advocated practical reforms in regard to railroad traveling on the Sabbath and on holidays, the abridgment of the seven days of mourning, the use of the organ, etc., and gave a short sketch of his life. His biographer, Leopold Löw, wrote an introduction to this work.

In consequence of the Damascus affair in 1840, Chorin republished the apology written in 1753 by Sonnenfels, in which the author proves the falsity of the blood accusation. Chorin added an introduction and Löw a biographical notice.

On July 26, 1844, during the last weeks of his life, he wrote from his sick-bed a declaration expressing his full accord with the Rabbinical Conference of Brunswick, and on August 11 he sent an address to the conference of Hungarian rabbis at Páks. He died at Arad.

He took an active part in the efforts for Jewish emancipation, and was very influential with the state authorities. His grandson, Franz Chorin, was a Hungarian deputy.

title: Aaron Chorin


text:
Talk:Colorful (manga)

Review(s)
--KrebMarkt (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * THEM anime: anime DVD

title: Talk:Colorful (manga)


text:
12 Songs (Neil Diamond album)

12 Songs is the twenty-sixth studio album by Neil Diamond, released in 2005. It was his first studio album since 2001's Three Chord Opera. It was produced by Rick Rubin.

The working title for the album was self-titled. The original pressing of the album was copy-protected using Sony's controversial XCP technology.

Album history
Initial work on the album began after Diamond had concluded his tour behind Three Chord Opera in 2002. Retreating to his Colorado cabin, Diamond found himself temporarily snowed in, and started to pass the time away by working on new material.

Not long afterward, Diamond met Rick Rubin. Rubin expressed interest in working with Diamond, and the two got together several times at each other's homes before ever going into the recording studio.

Rubin, using the artist's Bang and early Uni albums as a springboard, encouraged Diamond to keep writing material over the course of a year. Once the two collaborators had plenty of material at their disposal that they felt strongly about, Rubin put together some of the same musicians he had used for Johnny Cash's American Recordings releases, including Tom Petty sidemen Mike Campbell and Benmont Tench, and encouraged Diamond to play guitar himself in the studio. The sessions were also the last ever performance by organ player Billy Preston, who died in June 2006.

The end result, 12 Songs, ended up being one of Diamond's most successful and critically acclaimed studio albums in years, debuting at #4 on the Billboard 200 album chart. Rubin's influence would extend beyond the recording sessions, as the subsequent tour behind the album found Diamond using tougher-sounding arrangements of his classic songs with his longtime backing band, and playing more guitar onstage than he had done since the Hot August Night era.

Extended copy protection
In November 2005, it was revealed that Sony BMG was distributing albums with Extended Copy Protection or XCP, a controversial feature that automatically installed rootkit software on any Microsoft Windows machine upon insertion of the disc. In addition to preventing the CD's contents from being copied, it was also revealed that the software reported the users' listening habits back to Sony and also exposed the computer to malicious attacks that exploited insecure features of the rootkit software. Though Sony refused to release a list of the affected CDs, the Electronic Frontier Foundation identified 12 Songs as one of the discs with the invasive software.

Rubin says that he and Diamond were not aware of XCP, and Rubin provided this explanation to The New York Times: The CD debuted at No. 4 [and] was the highest debut of Neil's career, off to a great start. But Columbia—it was some kind of corporate thing—had put spyware on the CD. That kept people from copying it, but it also somehow recorded information about whoever bought the record. The spyware became public knowledge, and people freaked out. There were some lawsuits filed, and the CD was recalled by Columbia. Literally pulled from stores. We came out on a Tuesday, by the following week the CD was not available. Columbia released it again in a month, but we never recovered. Neil was furious, and I vowed never to make another album with Columbia.

By December 2005, Sony BMG had remastered and repressed 12 Songs and all other albums released with the XCP software as standard, non-copy-protected CDs.

Track listing
All songs written by Neil Diamond.
 * 1) "Oh Mary" - 5:12
 * 2) "Hell Yeah" - 4:25
 * 3) "Captain of a Shipwreck" - 3:55
 * 4) "Evermore" - 5:18
 * 5) "Save Me a Saturday Night" - 3:31
 * 6) "Delirious Love" - 3:12
 * 7) "I'm on to You" - 4:27
 * 8) "What's It Gonna Be" - 4:04
 * 9) "Man of God" - 4:21
 * 10) "Create Me" - 4:10
 * 11) "Face Me" - 3:27
 * 12) "We" - 3:49
 * 13) "Men Are So Easy" (bonus track on special edition) - 4:04
 * 14) "Delirious Love" (featuring Brian Wilson) (bonus track on special edition) - 3:23

Personnel

 * Neil Diamond – vocals, guitar
 * Mike Campbell – guitar, horn and string arrangements, conductor
 * Smokey Hormel, Pat McLaughlin, Jason Sinay – guitar
 * Jonny Polonsky – guitar, bass guitar
 * Lenny Castro – percussion
 * Benmont Tench – piano, Hammond organ
 * Larry Knechtel, Roger Joseph Manning Jr. – piano
 * Patrick Warren – Chamberlin
 * Billy Preston – Hammond organ (4, 9, 11)
 * Jimmie Haskell – horn and string arrangements (4)
 * Brian Wilson – vocals (14)

Production

 * Producer – Rick Rubin
 * Recorded by Greg Fidelman, Jason Lader and Andrew Scheps.
 * Additional Recording – Mark Linette
 * Assistant Engineers – Greg Burns, Chris Holmes, Pete Martinez, Jim Monti, Dana Nielsen and Erich Talaba.
 * Mixed by Greg Fidelman
 * Recorded and Mixed at Arch Angel Studios (Los Angeles, CA).
 * Additional Recording at Ocean Way Recording, The Sound Factory and Akademie Mathematique of Philosophical Sound (Los Angeles, CA); Sound City Studios (Van Nuys, CA).
 * Mastered by Vlado Meller at Sony Mastering (New York City, NY).
 * Art Direction and Design – Reina Katzenberger
 * Photography – Martin Atkins

title: 12 Songs (Neil Diamond album)


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funkadelphia

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all four. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:36, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Funkadelphia
NN band vanity, appears to fail WP:MUSIC. Co-nominated along with articles on band members Aaron Weik, Matt Conlin, and Dan Leayman. Delete. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 03:08:51, 2005-08-24 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN *drew 03:23, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all, niche, if barely. Let them create a page when they've released a label album at least. --Fallout boy 04:57, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the lot. the wub  "?/!"  08:35, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all, nnbv. -- BD2412 talk 17:57, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn band vanity. -- Etacar11   01:51, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable - Tεx  τ  urε  16:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text: User talk:70.68.170.4

title: User talk:70.68.170.4


text: Category:Neil Diamond albums

title: Category:Neil Diamond albums


text:
Talk:12 Songs (Neil Diamond album)

Fair use rationale for Image:12Songs.jpg
Image:12Songs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Billy Preston
From the article The Road to Escondido: "Contained on this album are the final recordings of Billy Preston"

On this article: "The sessions were also the last ever performance by organ player Billy Preston"

Dunno which is right but they cant both be. I'm inclined to think Escondido is right cos it was released a year after this. It doesn't help that neither claim is sourced. Jh39 (talk) 20:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/neildiamond/albums/album/8750525/review/8758117/12_songs
 * In 12 Songs (Neil Diamond album) on 2011-05-23 02:41:11, 404 Not Found
 * In 12 Songs (Neil Diamond album) on 2011-06-01 11:38:31, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 11:38, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Neil's guitar playing
Why on earth would they say that "12 Songs" is the first album since the Bang era to feature Mr. Diamond playing his own guitar in the studio? I don't know where this "Neil never played guitar in the studio" nonsense came from, because photographic evidence indicates that Neil did in fact play guitar and have it with him in the recording studio both on his Uni/MCA output and during that era, as does a book about the American Sound Studio in Memphis, and he likely played guitar on the majority of his output for Columbia Records, if not always credited. There is a YouTube video called Neil Diamond Interview + Studio Session 1984 (the overdubbed voiceover is in German) and in the studio footage, he has a C.F. Martin acoustic guitar standing close by his side and there are a couple of Ovations in the background. He was also credited with playing acoustic guitar on his album "Lovescape" and whilst neither "Love at the Greek" nor "Hot August Night 2" credit him with guitar, he is clearly playing it both on the album and in the artwork, so remember: don't believe everything you read or what album credits say.61.69.217.3 (talk) 05:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:12 Songs (Neil Diamond album)


text: User:PanchoS/Germany tourism Nuremberg area


text:
Dinomyidae

The Dinomyidae are a family of South American hystricognath rodents: the dinomyids were once a very speciose group, but now contains only a single living species, the pacarana. Several of the extinct dinomyids were among the largest rodents known to date; these included the bison-sized Josephoartigasia monesi and the smaller Josephoartigasia magna. The dinomyids are thought to have occupied ecological niches associated with large grazing mammals due to their ability to compete with the native ungulates of South America. On the other side, they could feed on aquatic or swampy plants along the ancient rivers. These large forms disappeared after the formation of a connection to North America. The modern pacarana is only modest in size, considerably smaller than the capybara.

The Neoepiblemidae, an entirely extinct family, may actually be part of the Dinomyidae; both groups are undoubtedly closely related.

Genera

 * Family: Dinomyidae
 * †Agnomys incertae sedis
 * †Borikenomys - incertae sedis?
 * †Pseudodiodomus incertae sedis
 * Subfamily: Dinomyinae
 * Dinomys - pacarana
 * †Telodontomys
 * Subfamily: †Eumegamyinae

 * †Arazamys
 * †Briaromys
 * †Colpostemma
 * †Doellomys
 * †Eumegamysops
 * †Eumegamys
 * †Gyriabrus
 * †Isostylomys
 * †Josephoartigasia
 * †Orthomys
 * †Pentastylodon
 * †Pseudosigmomys
 * †Telicomys
 * †Tetrastylus
 * Subfamily: †Potamarchinae
 * †Eusigmomys
 * †Olenopsis
 * †Potamarchus
 * †Scleromys
 * †Simplimus

title: Dinomyidae


text:
Gogh

Gogh may refer to:

 * Gogh, the Dutch name for Goch, a town near Kleve in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
 * Szilvia Gogh, a Hungarian scuba diver and stunt performer
 * Vincent van Gogh, a Dutch painter
 * Van Gogh (disambiguation)

title: Gogh


text:
Virgilijus Alekna

Virgilijus Alekna (13 February 1972) is a Lithuanian former discus thrower and politician. He won medals at the 2000, 2004 and 2008 Olympics, including two golds.

After retiring from athletics, Alekna was elected to the national parliament, the Seimas, in 2016.

He has three children – Martynas Alekna, the discus world record holder Mykolas Alekna, and Gabrielė Aleknaite.

Athletics career
Alekna has won two gold medals in the Summer Olympics in the discus throw, the first was in 2000 and the second in 2004. He also won the bronze medal at the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics. In 2007, he was appointed as UNESCO Champion for Sport. His personal record is, surpassed only by the former world record (74.08 metres), and his son Mykolas' to be ratified new world record, (74.35 metres).

Alekna was awarded the title of the Athlete of the Year for 2000 by Track and Field News. He was also awarded the Order of the Lithuanian Grand Duke Gediminas by the government of Lithuania. He became the Lithuanian Sportsman of the Year 4 times (2000, 2004, 2005, and 2006). Since 1995 Alekna has served as a bodyguard of the Lithuanian Prime Minister.

He is married to former long jumper Kristina Sablovskytė-Aleknienė and has two sons named Martynas and Mykolas, also discus throwers.

At a height of 2.02m, Alekna has an unusually long armspan, measured 2.24 m (7 ft 4 in), which is helpful in discus throwing. He can make fingerprints on windows of two opposite sides of a bus simultaneously.

During the 2007 World Championship Virgilijus Alekna competed with an injury. Having sustained the injury on 20 August, he competed in the World Championship's qualification on 28 August and, as a result, suffered a defeat, which broke his 37 victories in a row over the past two years. In 2017 Alekna was awarded the European Athletics Lifetime Achievement award.

Political career
In May 2016, Alekna announced he would participate in the elections to the Seimas the following October on the electoral list of the opposition Liberal Movement, without joining the party. He lost the run-off in Naujamiestis single-member constituency, but was elected to the Twelfth Seimas through the electoral list of the party, where he was rated second.

title: Virgilijus Alekna


text:
Khoo Boon Hui

Khoo Boon Hui (born 1954) is a Singaporean former police officer who has been serving as Senior Deputy Secretary at the Ministry of Home Affairs. Khoo served as President of Interpol from 2008 to 2012, and Commissioner of Police from 1997 to 2010.

Education
Upon graduation from Anglo-Chinese School, Khoo was conferred the Singapore Armed Forces Overseas Scholarship in 1973.

Khoo graduated from St John's College, University of Oxford in 1976 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in engineering and economics. He subsequently went on to complete a Master of Public Administration degree at the Harvard Kennedy School in 1982. He also attended the Advanced Management Program at Wharton School in 2002.

Career
Despite being an SAF scholar, Khoo was called to join the Singapore Police Force (SPF) after a short stint in the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF). He began his career in 1977 and has held various appointments, including Director of Strategic Planning in 1987, Police Chief of Staff in 1990, Director of Criminal Investigation Department in 1991 and Deputy Commissioner of Police in 1995.

In July 1997, he was appointed Commissioner of Police. Khoo held the post for 14 years and was succeeded by Ng Joo Hee on 1 February 2010, taking on a new post of Senior Deputy Secretary at the Ministry of Home Affairs.

In 2017, Khoo was appointed to the Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace, and he served on the commission until its successful conclusion in 2019, participating in the drafting of its eight norms related to non-aggression in cyberspace.

Interpol
Khoo was one of the three vice-presidents of the Interpol Executive Committee from 2006 to 2009. On 9 October 2008, Khoo was elected as the president of Interpol for a four-year term.

Awards and recognition
For his contribution to the police service, he was awarded the Public Administration Medal (Silver) in 1992, the Long Service Medal in 1998 as well as the Meritorious Service Medal and 2nd Clasp to the Singapore Police Service Long Service in 2003.

He was also conferred the Knight Grand Cross (First Class) of the Most Noble Order of the Crown of Thailand by the King of Thailand in March 2002, the Bintang Bhayangkara Utama (National Police Meritorious Service Star) by the President of Indonesia in June 2002 and the Panglima Gagah Pasukan Polis (Kerhormat) (Knight Grand Commander, Order of Police Heroism) by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong of Malaysia in April 2003. In July 2004, Khoo was conferred the Darjah Pahlawan Negara Brunei Yang Amat Perkasa Darjah Pertama (Order of the Hero of the State of Brunei, First Class) by the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Brunei Darussalam and it comes with the title of Dato Seri Pahlawan.

In Aug 2005, His Majesty Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-Pertuan Agong XII of Malaysia conferred the Award, Darjah Kebesaran Panglima Setia Mahkota (Kerhormat) (PSM) to Khoo. The award, literally translated as Commander of the Most Distinguished Order of the Crown (Honorary).

Personal life
Khoo is married to Puan Sri Betty Au. The couple have two children.

title: Khoo Boon Hui


text:
User talk:QX100

Hey, if you want a good time tonight look for Night of the Living Dummy, it has what you like: slave girls and a their master

Remember to call California Driving School —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.71.41.87 (talk) 20:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The Screwfly Solution (Masters of Horror episode) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.71.41.108 (talk) 21:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC) fs RapeLay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.22.83 (talk) 14:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Mumbly Joe listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mumbly Joe. Since you had some involvement with the Mumbly Joe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 07:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:QX100


text:
User talk:Tsiaojian lee

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Samw 03:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hanzi
Thanks for adding all the hanzi! Badagnani 19:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

How did you figure out Ping Chong and all the other Chinese Americans? That could be hard without actually contacting them directly. Badagnani 18:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

 * First I google with the English name plus one Chinese keyword (e.g. "Ping Chong" +劇場 (i.e. theatre)). Some hits e.g. 1, 2 give his name in both English & Chinese, and they are phonetically consistent.  Finally, I do another Google search using only Chinese (+張家平 +劇場).  Most of the resulting 19 hits are about a Chinese-American theatre artist, so it's pretty much the same person.  --Tsiaojian lee 18:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

urea-formaldehyde resin as animal feed additive
If, from reading the chinese sites, you can determine whether this is marketed primarily for use as NPN in ruminant feed, you might want to move the mention of it down into your new NPN section after the ADM info. Purely on style we should try for some consistency. I went with non-protein nitrogen spelled out so that non-industry types wouldn't have to remember yet another acronym ("NPN") but either way it's great to see the additional info. Abby Kelleyite 23:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the editing! The 2 Chinese sites I cited were discussing urea-formaldehyde as an adulteration, so I left that in the "intentional contamination" subsection.  Its use in ruminants (which is carried out not only in China but also US, India, USSR, Finland etc.) is moved to the NPN subsection.--Tsiaojian lee 00:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

 * I moved them down to the end of the NPN section for now since they aren't melamine specific and haven't been implicated in the specific ingredients involved in the recalled products. See what you think,.  I had also taken out the "adulterant" mention {before reading this. oops!] and I'm going back now to change that. Please make sure what I end up with reflects the chinese original.  Thanks for all the great new info.! Abby Kelleyite 14:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Btw, I think a more general article on food adulteration in China would be an excellent candidate for a permanent article (in addition to this current event article). Abby Kelleyite 14:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Saw the further reference you added, which was certainly helpful to me. I just wanted to emphasize: 1) the change I made in moving the urea-formaldehyde down is in the nature of suggestion, that is, if you feel it would be clearer back where it was originally, by all means move it back; and 2) I didn't add the chinese language ref to the PRC response, not because I didn't think it shouldn't be there, but because I can't verify what it says.  By all means, please add it if you think it's relevant.  This was a lot of verbiage, but given the nature of written electronic exchanges, I wanted to make sure you understood that I am not asseting some sort of "ownership" to the article. Abby Kelleyite 13:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

 * What you did seems reasonable. I'll continue to follow the changes and add material (esp. those not in mainstream media) when I come across it. I am most  interested in examining the surrounding media coverage.  Some of my ideas were brought up on the discussion page (thanks for incorporating them into the main article ☺).  Some other thoughts may not be suitable here due to wikipedia policy, so I am keeping them in a blog instead.  --Tsiaojian lee 02:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the link to your blog. I think we have some points of agreement that as you say are outside of wiki policy and thus not completely appropriate for discussion here. I've blogged some of this as well.   Note that the title and the tone of that post are geared somewhat to the intended audience. Back to here, I'm glad you linked the esb powder. Abby Kelleyite 11:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

melamine versus melamine resin

 * It seems increasingly like Barboza is talking about melamine monomer but perhaps both kinds are used as NPN adulterants. Have you seen any reference anywhere that raises this as a possibility?  It would be good to get the debate, if any, into the article for NPOV.  Surely someone quotable has raised this possibility but I can't find it in english, anyway.  Abby Kelleyite 18:44, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

 * I haven't seen anybody in mainstream media looking into this. In his Apr 30 article, Barboza said melamine costs "about $1.20 for each protein count per ton".  Melamine is about 66% nitrogen while protein has 16%.  Assuming a "protein count"  = 1% protein, his description means one can replace 1 ton of pure protein by 0.25 ton of melamine at a price of $120.  That gives a melamine price of $480/ton, or about 3840 yuan/ton.  Compare that with the going price of urea in China (it takes 3 molecule of urea to make 1 molecule of melamine), Barboza's melamine does look more like the monomer.  However, from a business point of view, waste melamine plastic would be much cheaper than even monomer (industrial grade of mixed by-product), somewhat less toxic and deliver almost the same amount of NPN...  --Tsiaojian lee 21:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

 * I suspect that both may be being used, particularly with what you have reported in regard to the "prior art" of using ground urea-formaldehyde resin. There was mention in one of the barboza pieces, if I remember correctly, that the melamine scrap he was talking about used to be free and now is auctioned off. I seriously suspect that it is a mixture of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen of varying compositions (including melamine and cyanuric acid) produced as a residue in the coal->urea->melamine process, much like the mix of hydrocarbon waste in the standard FT coal gasification. I hope (because of the expected lower toxicity) that ground melamine resin may be the more common contaminant.  Both companies he's focused on so far, though, have been chemical manufacturers.  I fear there may be a lot of this glop.  Anyway, if you find even a chinese language only ref re ground melamine resin, I'd add it for balance. Abby Kelleyite 12:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

 * After doing some research, I re-wrote the synthesis section of melamine. What you suspected indeed looks VERY LIKELY!!  The solid from melamine waste water contains mostly melamine but also some cyanuric acid etc.  Since it's an unwanted waste it would also be very cheap.  That also explains the cyanuric acid... --Tsiaojian lee 20:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Btw, feel free to move this stuff back into the articles discussion page if you want. I added the additional comment here just to make sure you saw it, given that the original discussion has gone somewhat dormant. It might be useful to get this stuff all back in there in case anyone else starts looking into the issue. Abby Kelleyite 14:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Did we find any english language references while I was away? Abby Kelleyite 15:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

 * On May 07, USA Doday did concede that using chemical-grade melamine in place of protein is not economical, but didn't explain what the "scrap" is either.

 * P.S. I cannot seem to find reference of melamine as food adulterant (in Chinese or English) prior to the pet food fiasco. That doesn't mean food adulteration is uncommon in China, or melamine is absent in the tainted pet food.  But it still begs the question: just how "widespread" is it there?--Tsiaojian lee 19:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Outstanding work on the melamine production
If you're still here, I think the pet food crisis article has stabilized if you want to incorporate your findings there. Abby Kelleyite 01:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I added the key references to the melamine cyanuric acid waste product in a couple other places on melamine and in the appropriate research section in melamine, 2007 pet food crisis and cyanuric acid. I also added a few small changes in the melamine production section of the 2007 pet foof crisis reflecting your new info. This last, in particular, could use some more work. Abby Kelleyite 02:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Btw, I wanted to mention that I completely understood how you organized the media reports on the melamine page. The only reason I moved a version of the waste product crystallization downpage was so that no one could possibly miss it. I also migrated the cyanuric acid as NPN cites over to the cyanuric acid research summary, which was overdue. Abby Kelleyite 21:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Be very careful of your password.
Someone broke into my account but I think I have goth them stopped. Abby Kelleyite 19:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mitbbs logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Mitbbs logo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Junko Sakurada
An article that you have been involved in editing, Junko Sakurada, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Northwestgnome (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mitbbs logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Mitbbs logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 04:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tsiaojian lee


text:
Talk:Denis Rocan

Untitled
Rocan supported the campaigns of his friend Reg Alcock in the federal elections of 2000 and 2004, despite the fact that Alcock is a Liberal.

Can anyone verify this? I've found a Hansard article in which Alcock cites Rocan as his friend, but I can't find anything about electoral support. CJCurrie 03:12, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

I can verify this. I think the reason you are having problems with empirical data, is because all that was ever published was a picture in the Winnipeg Free Press in 2000 of Denis Rocan putting up a Reg Alcock sign.

 * Actually, I've since discovered proof that Rocan endorsed Alcock -- I just haven't gotten around to putting the information on the page. CJCurrie 05:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Denis Rocan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050404134848/http://www.denisrocan.com/ to http://www.denisrocan.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Denis Rocan


text:
User talk:Pobox758

Welcome, from Journalist
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:Pobox758


text:
User talk:Jhendrix86

Speedy deletion of NY LA
A tag has been placed on NY LA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cerejota (talk) 08:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Cerejota (talk) 09:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Jhendrix86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Cerejota (talk) 09:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Talkback
Cerejota (talk) 10:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Cerejota (talk) 01:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dexter Rides Again
A tag has been placed on Dexter Rides Again requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on : explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. → Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 01:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of tallest buildings in Rochester, Minnesota
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of tallest buildings in Rochester, Minnesota, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern:
 * Few of these buildings are notable in their own right and this list is unlikely to be useful.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jonathunder (talk) 19:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Elysian-Chicago.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Elysian-Chicago.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jhendrix86


text:
User talk:Mymusicscene

Welcome, from Journalist
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:Mymusicscene


text:
User talk:Sugar Bear/Archive01

'''DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.'''

This archive page covers approximately the dates between 24 August 2005 and 5 January 2007.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.

Please add new archivals to User talk:Ibaranoff24/Archive02. (See How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. (Ibaranoff24 18:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC))

Welcome, from Journalist
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 03:13, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Bakshi's LOTR
Nice work on The Lord of the Rings (1978 film)! The article is looking much better than it did only a few days ago. Good work! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

The anon editor who's been causing problems over the last few days put a personal attack against you in an image caption, claiming that you faked the "Part 1" subtitle on the The Lord of the Rings Part 1 poster you recently added. I've removed the attack, but thought you might like to know. Also, for the record, you probably ought to state on the article's talk page that you didn't fake it. (Your word will be enough for me.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 16:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Talk:The Lord of the Rings
It is considered misbehaving to delete the comments of others from talk pages (See Talk_page_guidelines). Furthermore, it is deceitful to label the deletion of an entire section as a "minor edit". Dystopos 05:22, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lord of the Rings Part 1(a).jpg has been listed for deletion
I put the image on Images and media for deletion because it appears to be an altered version of this. I don't really understand Wikipedia's image policy, but this seems problematic to me. It's also entirely possible that this was an honest mistake, but as it is it looks like the image shouldn't be on Wikipedia. (If you can replace it with an unaltered version without the copyright text over it — say, an actual scan of the physical poster — I think that would be fine.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:29, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Removal of comments
As Dystopos mentioned above, it's considered bad form to remove another user's comments. Please do not remove my comments from Talk:The Lord of the Rings (1978 film) again. Also, you should familiarize yourself with the three-revert rule, which I think you've violated on the talk page in your effort to remove the comments made by Mr. Bruun. I understand that there is bad blood between you and Mr. Bruun, and his behaviour hasn't been spotless either — but that doesn't justify the removal of his remarks. If this continues, I'll report both of you for edit warring and 3RR violation. Let's work this out in a civilized fashion, without the removal of comments or the name-calling. OK? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:King Kong (early colorized version).jpg
For what reason did you put Image:King Kong (early colorized version).jpg up for speedy delete? Please use the tag in the future, so as to aid administrators. Enochlau 02:38, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I uploaded a more famous image from the colorized version of the movie into the "film colorization" article, so I felt I didn't need that other image. (Ibaranoff24 02:34, 4 December 2005 (UTC))

Sources for Sleeping Beauty (album)
Hello, good work on Sleeping Beauty (album), and thanks for the contribution. However, you forgot to add any references to the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. What websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Sleeping Beauty (album)? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? Thank you very much. - SimonP 04:45, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

The Lord of the Rings Infobox
Help people instead of insulting them, huh? If you could, please revisit your December 10 comments and see who started the personal attacks. Also, please read the comments I have left in the Infobox talk page. I am not and don't pretend to be high and mighty, as you so sarcastically put it. However, if you insist on resorting to purile and personal jibes, I seriously hope you don't expect me to sit around and take that kind of nonsense from you. If you, on the other hand, seriously want to improve the quality of the infobox, I will help you any way I can. As I have said in the infobox talk page, I you have the necessary information on the LoTR animated films, please pass that along to me and I will help you put them in the infobox. AreJay 22:28, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Happy Crimbo!
Have a Proper and Merry Crimbo. , in fact here is a pressie from the Doctor to you. Ho. Ho. Ho! Dr. McCrimbo 22:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

One FAC at a time is suggested
Perhaps you missed it, but there's a bit at the top of Featured article candidates that says "Please do not place more than one nomination at a time — this makes it difficult to do each article and its objections justice." Based on that, I'd suggest picking one and withdrawing the rest for now. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Sir, I appreciate your support for my nomination of the Wellington article but, not be intruding or eavesdropping, I must agree with "Bunchofgrapes."--Anglius 05:21, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Just curious
Hey,

Just wounder, are you from jeresy? Some of your recent updates/nominations are topics a friend of mine has been mentioning to me latly. -- ZeWrestler  Talk 05:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No, Florida. (Ibaranoff24 06:08, 26 December 2005 (UTC))

FAC voting
Please keep in mind while voting for articles that you must state a reason along with your Object or Support. I have seen you have been supporting several articles that do not fit the FA criteria. All articles are tested against the criteria to become featured, so if you vote Support without a valid reason to do so your vote will not be counted. Thanks — Wackymacs 01:47, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Umm I'm not too sure wether you understood me or not - Just saying 'Good article.' is not a reason, thats a statement - You need to say why you think it is a good article and make sure this complies with the FA criteria. Thanks! — Wackymacs 02:01, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Handschiegel Color sources
Thanks for cleaning up the Handschiegel_Color_Process page. Obviously, I've been researching the process for some time, so each title has its own source. If you're puzzled on a certain title, please let me know and I will cite the source for it. Thephotoplayer 22:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Category:United Artists films
You've added this twice to Dr. No and I've now reverted you twice because it's redundant. Category:James Bond films is already a subcategory of Category:United Artists films. Hope you understand. K1Bond007 01:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Links seeem spammy
I've seen you make a number of edits adding links to Movie Tome and Legend Films... Considering your contribution history I can only wonder if these links are being made for self-promotional purposes or what. You seem to have contributed good information on these topics, otherwise these kinds of actions (lots of link dropping) would have lead me to immediately undo your edits as spam. At this point I am only asking why your edits seem to be so one-sided at this time. DreamGuy 02:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I never intended any of my links for spam purposes, nor do I intend my edits to be one-sided. If you see any Legend Films links that seem grevious, go ahead and delete them (but if the company does release a colorized version of a certain film, it should at least be mentioned in the article). But I don't think that the Movie Tome links should be deleted -- it would be one-sided to link to the Internet Movie Database page and not to Movie Tome, in my opinion. (Ibaranoff24 02:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC))
 * Also, I do not work for Legend Films, if that is what you are inquiring. (Ibaranoff24 02:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC))

Wikipedia Project
Hi, my name is Federico (alias Pain) and I am creating a section for nominating th best user page, I was wondering if you were interested in joining the project.

The project has just started, and we need help to spread the word and ameliorate it.

Votes_for_best_User_page

Best regards, Federico Pistono  ✆   ✍  14:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:JackBuetelinTheOutlaw.jpg
Hi, I don't understand why you would list this image for deletion because it's incorrectly tagged, when you could easily correct the tag. I have changed the tag to film-screenshot which is the same tag as thousands of other acceptable images. Could you now please remove this from images for deletion. thanks Rossrs 20:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Revenge of the Old Queen
Please see WP:EL and WP:RS to help determine what are and are not appropriate links to include in an article. Also, please familiarize yourself with WP:VAND before you again accuse someone of vandalism. -- Krash (Talk) 05:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * From WP:EL: "External sites can possibly violate copyright. Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page." Also:"Links to normally avoid...A website that you own or maintain..." I'm not suggesting that this is your website; I contend that geocities/angelfire/forums/etc are unencyclopedic and unreliable links to include. -- Krash (Talk) 05:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

 * I changed the link, but I do not consider Geocities/Angelfire websites to be unencyclopedic. Forum links can be unencyclopedic, but there are exceptions to this rule, such as if the info is from an official forum, and directly from the mouth of an official person (such as the director of a film). (Ibaranoff24 05:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC))
 * A reasoning behind that is due to the fact that a lot of individuals who create those pages tend to use hearsay and conjecture and attempt to pass it off as factual content. It is often hard to gauge whether or not the information on such sites is based in solid fact or mixed with rumours and other such things. 63.233.87.189 07:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Categories for deletion
Quite simply, I didn't know Category:People who worked with David Lynch existed. Powers 12:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

userboxes
I noticed you created some cool userboxes...how do you do that?Osbus 18:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I copied the code from some other userboxes, added in my own text, changed the colors around, and sometimes, added pictures that I felt were appropriate. In the case of the anti-colorization userbox, I took a free-licensed image of a rainbow, removed the color, and re-uploaded the image under a separate name using the same license. (Ibaranoff24 02:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC))

Image:36th Chamber of Shaolin VHS cover.gif
I noticed that you tagged the page Image:36th Chamber of Shaolin VHS cover.gif for speedy deletion with the reason "The cover for a completely different movie than which the uploader previously uploaded it as". However, "The cover for a completely different movie than which the uploader previously uploaded it as" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use one of our other deletion processes, proposed deletion or articles for deletion if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks! In this case, you can alternatively use WP:IFD. Stifle 20:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Excessive vandalism
Stop accusing other people of vandalism when it's really a content dispute.--Prosfilaes 00:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I've taken this conversation to my talk page; however, I have reported your 3RR violation on Administrators' noticeboard/3RR.--Prosfilaes 00:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

WP:3RR warning
Regarding article Wizards (film) :
 * Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 00:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 12:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I think many who would take our side against the menace of censorship do not know about this poll. If you have some time to spare, would you mind posting a short message on their talk page (like mine) to let them know of this poll and invite them to voice their opinions? By involving more people, a larger portion of the Wikipedia community can have their say, for or against the policy. Some places you can go for a list of users are Wikipedia_talk:Censorship, Category:Wikipedians_against_censorship and Category:Wikipedians_opposed_to_censorship_of_the_human_body as well as any friends you might have. Please check that I've not already posted a message with the heading Wikipedia_talk:Censorship in their talk page to avoid double-postings. If you don't have the time, feel free to ignore this request. Thank you.Loom91 09:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Robert Crumb.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Robert Crumb.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:P-Chan  23:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes
Please join us in discussing a topic concerning a Rotten Tomatoes % in the Wikifilm infobox. Your opinions would be appreciated.

Template_talk:Infobox_Film--P-Chan 23:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Do you want to join CAUBXD?
Hello,, do you want to join CAUBXD?

CAUBXD is a "campaign" against the deletion of userboxes. It is not an official policy, and will probably never be. What it is, though, is a campaign to oppose the mass deletion of userboxes and unfarities resulting from userbox deletion votes (see here and here; these two are examples of everyone saying Keep and admins deciding Subst.

Please consider.

Fr e dd  ie Against Userbox Deletion? 16:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Emergency!
Cyde is attempting to get into CAUBXD! Go to the CAUBXD page and click on the last "e" in User:Fredil Yupigo/Signature! Hurry! Fr e dd  ie Against Userbox Deletion? 18:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Horror/Collaboration of the month
Hi! I noticed your name on the WikiProject Horror membership list and am writing to all members who have not voted for the Collaboration of the month. Today is the designated selection day to choose the collaboration, but we currently have a tie between the two articles receiving the most votes, John Carpenter and Dario Argento. I am hoping to remedy this by drumming up a few more votes. Note that by voting for any nominated article (not limited to these two) you are indicating your "commitment to support and aid in collaborating on that specific article if it is chosen," so please feel absolutely free to ignore this message if for any reason you don't wish or would not be able to participate.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

HCOTM
We have a winner!

Cult films
Shalom, Isaac. Help save the cult films page! It's become madness. Jonathan F 07:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Three Sources?
Three sources confirming the point of the game is to kill anyone who does not convert to Christianity? List them. And prove they know what they are talking about. The secular reviews by people who have played the game completely contradict the nonsence espoused by Talk2Action. Check them out here:

Some quotes from gamers who have played the game:

 * Players aren't competing to kill the enemy army -- rather, they're trying to save them, and each person killed represents a failure rather than a success. "We found that adhering closely to Biblical philosophies made the game more interesting rather than less," Lyndon said. "One of the key elements of that is to make sure that the player sees that every life is important and precious."

 * As you'd expect, you'll be encouraged to do good while playing the game, but you may also do evil, as well. Like many real-time strategy games, Eternal Forces features a variety of resources that you need to accumulate to build units. One of these resources is your spiritual rating, which measures how good or evil you are. If your troops kill civilians and innocents, your spiritual rating drops, and if it drops too much, you may see your units defect (each unit has his or her own spiritual rating), and if drops too far, demons will show up.

 * Killing civilians will definitely make you a friend of the devil.

 * The forces of evil mirror the forces of good, with the notable difference that the abilities of evil will decrease spirit, while those of good raise spirit (except for killing, which lowers spirit, no matter what).

Clearly the descriptions about killing are erroneous and should be dropped from this entry. Don't you even care about the truth? Such balatant disregard for it is rather shocking. Layman 15:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Do YOU care about the truth?
The Los Angeles Times and the Sioux City Journal both report killing. If you have a source more legitimate than my three sources, I'd like to see it. (Ibaranoff24 15:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC))

Yes, you are fighting the armies of the anti-Christ. But to leap from that to say you kill Jews, gays, etc. because they do not convert is a lie. You are lying. My entry does not deny there is killing, but that you are on a mission to convert or kill those who do not convert to Christianity. That is the outrageous lie you are repeating without real support. Layman 16:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

 * "My entry does not deny there is killing"
 * Yes, it does. (Ibaranoff24 16:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC))

 * Where? I note in the first paragraph that there is armed conflict between the armies of the anti-Christ and the Tribulation Force.  What I clarify is that you do not kill people because they fail to convert.  Yes, you may kill anti-Christ soldiers who are trying to kill you.  But you do not kill noncombatants who decline to convert to Christianity.  You keep repeating that lie with no support.  Layman 16:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

To make it clear for you, this is the outrageous lie you are repeating: "Players are issued high-tech military weaponry, and set on a mission to convert or kill Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, gays, and anyone who advocates the separation of church and state."

Show me where you find support for that in the LA Times? You can't. You are getting that from an anti-Christian site that is spewing propganda. You are buying it hook, line, and sinker. Be a little critical. Read the reviews I link to that are reviews by gamers who have actually played an early version of the game. Layman 16:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Idiot...please do not talk to me, alright? Go spread your bullshit someplace else, okay? You are taking up too much space on my Talk page. (Ibaranoff24 16:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC))

Thanks
I'm a huge film guy and I like wikipedia so I decided to put the two together. While my grammar's not the best others fix it for me; so I feel like i'm the big idea sorta person. My favorites are 70s dystopic future flicks like soylent green, marathon man, logan's run, etc. and I also weird ass indie stuff like twenty bucks, chumscrubber. Check out my myspace (Garrett8888) I put a bunch more movies on there. Andman8 17:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Night of the Living Dead
Just for future reference, any promotion above the B-level in the Wikifilm Project, must be done through the Official GA or FA process!--P-Chan 17:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Althought I think your assessment of an A is pretty close.--P-Chan 08:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

New Film Template
Could you leave your two cents about the new proposed film template here Andman8 19:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Make New User Boxes?... a request
I was on your User Page today, after I looked back at the history of a particular article page and saw your link. I notice that you say you have created User Boxes — something I have no personal experience of or expertise/knowledge for attempting. I thought I'd ask if you might try making a couple new boxes?

I'd like to see User Boxes for: "users who like to Cross-Country Ski"  and  "users who have Driven a Dogsled". As you may surmise, these are pastimes that some of us in the North enjoy.

Thanks for considering my request. ---Joel Russ

 * I didn't properly sign trhe above off. But I'll properly sign this off. --Joel Russ 13:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Jeff Simmons
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a disambiguation page for Jeff Simmons and moved the prior article to another location. Per WP:DAB, will you be doing the link clean up associated with the resulting move? Thanks --Brian G 20:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello, again. The favour of a reply would be appreciated.  It looks like someone else has done much of the original clean-up but there are a few left to be done.  I've also noticed that you have created or moved at least 2 additional disambiguations for other articles and have not done the clean-up.  Per WP:DAB, "A code of honor for creating disambiguation pages is to fix all resulting mis-directed links." --Brian G 15:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Carnivorous plant
Hi! Just in case you're not watching the page, I wanted to let you know I replied to you at Talk:Carnivorous plant 1 concerning the popular culture section. I wanted to get your opinion on what I noted there. Thanks! Best, Rkitko 01:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Hi again! Thanks for your attention to that article and talk page.  I replied again, if you wish to look it over.  Grazie.  Best, Rkitko 08:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Frank Zappa
I had no idea that book was a peice of shit. all apologies, what references would you reccommend? Another question, how the fuck did I delete the whole second part of the page? I don't know how the hell I managed to do that, but then again, i'm relatively new.The Guilty Undertaker
 * The only reference I truly recommend is Zappa's own book, The Real Frank Zappa Book. (Ibaranoff24 21:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC))

New userboxes
I have deleted a userbox template you recently created, as userboxes should no longer be created in templatespace per the terms of the German userbox solution. Here is the userbox code so that you can recreate the userbox in your userspace ("userfying") if you wish.

-- Cyde Weys 15:54, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Filmmaking changes
New discussion has started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Filmmaking regarding expansion of the project. As a member, your comments are welcome and wanted! Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 22:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Alfred Hitchcock.JPG
Hello, I noticed that you uploaded this picture and had a couple of questions. You originally said that it was "taken from a public domain print", can you elaborate further on this and find an applicable new template for it that states clearly how it is PD? Right now the template is changed from PD to screenshot, which is fair use and limits it's use in articles. It is used in a stub template UK-film-director-stub, which seems to me to be outside of the terms of fair use. Thanks, DVD+ R/W 22:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Bakshi LOTR images
Would you mind replacing Image:BakshiGandalfWhite.jpg with one from the DVD version? I took the screenshot from a VCD. Thanks! Uthanc 05:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Elrond doesn't have a Bakshi image at the moment. Thanks! Uthanc 06:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter
The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Chances are, when someone signs their post, puts it in the image's talk page (so it's not apparent), and doesn't negatively effect Wikipedia, it's not really vandalism is it? Just a bit of good humor. I won't revert, but I just wanted to say that I'm not a vandal, but an ordinary user --Planetary 01:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Little Shop of Horrors
Thanks for that detail - didn't know that. The issue is that the word "the" doesn't really make much difference to most people, it's still a bit confusing.

The problem is that most people won't be aware of the difference between two films, one of which is titled "Little Shop of Horrors" and the other titled "The Little Shop of Horrors". So it's worth putting the year in as well, to prevent confusion. FT2 (Talk 09:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

 * It might be worth thinking of people who don't know about all 3 versions. Someone just looking up the 1960 or 1986 version will not know that the word "the" was present or not in one or other title, and articles which link to one or the other will run the risk of ambiguity. You shouldn't rely upon the word "the" to distuinguish them. In that circumstance its probably good practice to put the year in the title, because it ensures that there is explicit clarity . FT2 (Talk 14:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

look
The picture is mine http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Bakshi http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Trabajonacho

User:83.49.225.1 20:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Midnight Movie images
Terrific! It's great to see the actual posters from the era. Best, Dan—DCGeist 04:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

No-Importance
That class is only for cats, templates, and other projects. All articles have some importance. The lowest for articles is "low". Thanks, :) Cbrown1023 21:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * ...... (I saw it and looked no further) Cbrown1023 22:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Just so you know, I don't care.... I think of you no differently as an editor. It was just a little note. Cbrown1023 22:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sugar Bear/Archive01