text:
Wikipedia:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive/Removed

/Archive1:until 12 June 2006 /Archive2:until 8 January 2007 /Archive3:until 23 April 2007

 * Support:
 * 1) S.dedalus 05:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) zenohockey 04:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This article practically doesn’t exist!!! Nearly every other art form has huge pages devoted to twentieth century practices. The body of this article consists of just 12 words! It has apparently been like this for over a year! If any article ever needed help it’s this one.--S.dedalus 05:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Solumeiras (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) HarrisonB - Talk 07:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * One of the most popular programmes of all time ever, article is fairly basic and should be a featured article. The programme is allegedly more popular than Lost and 24 in the United Kingdom. This article deserves featured article status --Solumeiras (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  bibliomaniac  1  5  01:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Blood Red Sandman  Open Up Your Heart  -  Receive My EviLove  07:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Lord Metroid 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Kidsheaven 19:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) An as  Talk? 13:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 21:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Duran 21:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) LordHarris 00:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Oberiko 18:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) DavidYork71 05:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) semper fictilis 18:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Think outside the box 11:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Dweller 11:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Emperor Walter Humala  · ( talk? ·  help! ) 18:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Dalf | Talk 22:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) Twerbrou 10:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) mirageinred 14:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Bossi ( talk ;; contribs ) 00:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) Ixistant 15:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Flubeca 19:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) Proabivouac 09:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) — Dave101  → talk → contributions  • 21:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) Timrollpickering 12:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) Kaiser matias 20:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Daniel5127 | Talk 03:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) BobbyCat 21:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) Darrenhusted 16:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Oneworld25 19:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) Scorpion0422 22:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 31) Sportsjam3 04:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * A very influential man in history. I ask you to set aside whatever beliefs you have for this man and think solely about improving the article to the standard it should be at.  bibliomaniac 1  5  01:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Agreed as per nom. Lord Metroid 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * One of the most important parts of 20th century history, should be a high priority and quality.Kidsheaven 19:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Among the most globally influential and recognizable historical figures of modern times. Oberiko 18:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The Great Statesman of mid-20th century EuropeDavidYork71 04:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It took a united world to defeat Germany, twice, in the last century.58.163.142.123 03:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Also worth noting that according the wikicharts tool it was the 17th most viewed article in January, 21st in Feb. and 17th again in march.
 * Agreed as per nom. Daniel5127 | Talk 03:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Kaiser matias 05:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 21:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1)  bibliomaniac  1  5  22:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Decided as one of Wikipedia's 200 core biographies, the man who is credited with surgical sterilisation, something that has affected most of our lives, and is only ranked as Start-class. Surely there is more that can be said. Kaiser matias 05:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Aminz 04:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jeltz  talk  19:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Sportsjam3 04:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Jeltz talk  19:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * I think this is an important article. -Aminz 04:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed, this article is in a poor shape and about an important topic too.
 * So important, but can definitely use some work.

 * Support:
 * 1) S.dedalus 05:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 01:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Elliott Carter is a really important classical modernist composer who is often considered America’s greatest composer in academic circles. The page is really bad and neglected (It was even nominated for deletion!) Other important modern composers have great pages, for instance Messiaen, so why is this page so stunted? S.dedalus 05:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

}

 * Support:
 * 1) YankeeDoodle14 04:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Clay 06:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Caponer 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Astrowob 14:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) User:Thomas.macmillan 11:11, 15 May 2007
 * 7) Ehjort 21:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * For one of the most influental people in western history, his article is remarkably short. It should be expanded and given a more non POV than it has now. YankeeDoodle14 04:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I wouldn't call this remarkably short, but definitely remarkably undercited. --Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Matt.kaner 23:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * (Takemitsu was the most eminent Japanese composer of the 20th century, and I've been working really hard to get this article up to scratch. Nevertheless it's a slow process for one person and if anyone is able to help, I think it would make a great featured article. Despite what you may think there is plenty of academic reference material available on him - look on JSTOR for example if you can, it's just a case of putting it all together into one coherent article.) Matt.kaner 23:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) John Carter 19:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Totnesmartin 20:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 10:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) BorgQueen 13:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Sportsjam3 04:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * One of the most important and most widely worshipped gods in the world today. His article as it currently exists is only a B class article. Article could use a lot of work, particularly regarding quotations, phrasing, and maybe NPOV. John Carter 19:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments:
 * Support:
 * 1) Pascal.Tesson 05:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)   →   Lwalt ♦ talk 11:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) BrothaTimothy 02:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) InnocuousPseudonym 04:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) MaJic 16:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) --Melancholyblues 11:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) User:Supershow Showmanship is the key 22:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The article could easily be improved to GA quality and perhaps even FA quality. There's a very decent start with a number of solid references. There's still plenty to do: an extensive copyedit, an "in popular culture" section that needs to be cleaned up, a more thorough discussion of his legacy, etc. In any case, it's the kind of article where editors with various skills and interests could find something worthwhile to do. The article falls in the scope of a number of projects so it should be easy to gather a good number of competent editors to help out. Of course, James Brown is a key figure in popular music and I just think it would be really nice to have the article featured by the first year of his death (December 25th). Pascal.Tesson 05:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

GA-Class quality? Didn't realized the quality of the article has slipped that far. The JB article was rated as B-Class, then A-Class quality earlier this year (also noted on the article's talk page) for the Biography and Georgia portals (this article is also rated as "top-importance" for the Georgia Portal). Also, the article was featured on the Music Portal during February 2007. Here's the content of the article at the last edit on February 1 and the last edit on February 28. Since I don't where to find the archives for past featured articles on portals, I don't know which version of the article appeared on the Music Portal during February 2007, especially since the article was also vandalized frequently at that time.
 * Comments by  →   Lwalt ♦ talk:

After I spent some time editing the article, I stepped back to take another look at what needs to be done for the article's improvement. Here are my comments for what I think is still needed to improve the article: ' →   Lwalt ♦ talk'''
 * comments moved to the James Brown talk page to avoid clogging the ACID page.Pascal.Tesson 17:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  22:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) - Flubeca Talk 00:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jaranda wat's sup 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Showmanship is the key 16:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Article has been under heavy editing since all the recent controversy surrounding the athlete. Most of the edits have been very poor and the article is really in need of a major overhaul to get it up to standards. -- Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  22:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. As Juan Miguel Fangio pointed out, this article isn't stable due to the subject's current media exposure. While we could improve the article now, I believe it should wait at least until after the sentence is decided, when the media attention should bog down. - Mtmelendez (Talk 13:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) John Carter 17:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * One of the more important tennis players in recent history, and certainly one of the most popular. Biographical content of existing article is frankly minimal. Article could be better with just a bit of work, and honestly should be better, given the importance of the subject. --John Carter 17:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  04:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) CJ 10:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Alexander Doria 12:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * It was put up for peer review at the end of August after much (and I mean a hell of a lot of) work by Jonyungk, but some people still didn't like it. This would make a cornerstone-type featured article if it succeeded. — $PЯINGεrαgђ  04:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 18:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Indianstar 05:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The WORLD'S RICHEST PERSON definitely deserves a better article than the one in its present state. --Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 18:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * His own article notes that he's the 14th richest person in the world. Certainly deserving of a better article (and definitely a better photo) but I don't know that you should indicate him as the "world's richest person" in light of that. I won't support this as there are many other articles that require more attention that are far mroe important to an English encyclopedia. -- linca linca  10:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The world's richest person can pay someone to improve his article if he wants to. If he wants to, he can certainly leave a message here. Reasonable Rates!! :) I agree that there probably are more important articles for wikipedia in general. Having said that, he might be a good nominee for the India or Biography collaboration. John Carter 17:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Or, even better, he could offer some on WP:BOUNTY. :-D --BorgQueen 20:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Sasha l (talk) 02:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Shark face  217  20:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Treehouse372 (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Topic need an attention. Sasha l (talk) 02:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * For minor characters in a fiction, I think it's pretty useless Bifgis (talk) 17:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Very interesting topic...I would like to work on this

 * Support:
 * 1) -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa  Chord 2  22:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) BaconSquishy (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Ritzbitz00 (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * To do has been set up several weeks ago, some suggestions were made, but without much outcome yet. Lots of sources have been collected here. Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  22:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Secret account 22:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Horrible article on one of the most important playwrights of the 20th century, haven't really improved for years (which is a rarity in wiki) --Secret account 22:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  JACO  PLANE  • 2007-03-20 23:38
 * 2) A Link to the Past (talk) 23:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  bibliomaniac  1  5  23:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Emperor Walter Humala  · ( talk? ·  help! ) 18:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Hero1701 18:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Kevinwong913 01:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Ixistant 20:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Greeves (talk • contribs) 22:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Bossi ( talk ;; contribs ) 00:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 14:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Themcman1 16:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Lord Metroid 22:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Bifgis 02:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Darrenhusted 16:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Astrowob 14:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Scorpion 19:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) --Imaginationac (Talk | Edits) 02:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 18)   Pendo 4 02:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Digiwrld1 23:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) Bifgis 03:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 21)  00:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) Sportsjam3 04:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Seminal gaming company that has a large influence on past/present/future culture. Created icons like Zelda/Mario/Donkey Kong, as well ass the Game Boy, NES, DS, Wii. The article is in dire need of proper references, and would make a good collaboration. Currently rated as B-class. JACO  PLANE  • 2007-03-20 23:38
 * By last check, Nintendo is worth more than $10 billion and has two of the most successful systems in the industry today, one of them being far more successful than any competitors or even non-competitors. - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * My mistake; they possess >$10 billion. Back when they were in second place to Sony, Microsoft wanted to buy them for $25 billion. And with the DS being more successful than the PS2 in Japan and Europe, and being pretty close in North America, I believe that they would be worth much, much more. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This is one of those articles that you just expect to be GA or higher. Greeves (talk • contribs) 22:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Everyone knows Nintendo. But the article is not great yet. That should not be happening.Pendo4 is here...Look around...hello???...I am here... 02:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've always thought the Nintendo article should be a candidate for improvement; I've significantly updated the List of Nintendo developers and the Divisions of Nintendo as they are under the Nintendo corporation banner. Digiwrld1 23:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Nydas (Talk) 09:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  SpL o T  // 05:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Daniel11 00:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * A topic of this importance deserves better than this sloppy article. Nydas (Talk) 09:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) ZayZayEM 02:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Kaiser matias 09:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Z leitzen  (talk)  05:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Darrenhusted 18:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) M&NCenarius 00:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This is an important anthropological term; but this article is an absolute mess of tabloid, trivia and vanity. I really thing a good, or even featured article could come from this subject if editors worked together on it.ZayZayEM

 * Support:
 * 1) Scorpion 15:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Gran2 15:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Alex 23:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Twerbrou 14:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) LordHarris 15:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Ğavin Ťing  14:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The article has fallen into bad shape and could use improving. He's a highly notable TV character. -- Scorpion 15:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Wasn't this in a past ACID request that was overdue?  bibliomaniac 1  5  23:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was previously nominated and didn't go through, but I didn't see anything against nominating an article a second time. -- Scorpion 13:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Tell anyone on the street "Bart Simpson" and they can tell you who he is. Hes definitely a very influential person who deserves to be "ACIDed" =) Ğavin Ťing  14:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Kzrulzuall   Talk • Contribs 01:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Sportsjam3 15:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Lεmση  flαsh  (t)  /  (c)  22:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Dictouray 16:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * An extremely popular sport followed by millions... And not even a GA? --Kzrulzuall   Talk • Contribs 01:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  •F e l i x•  T 19:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Dictouray 16:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * A big topic affecting millions of people needs a little help and improvement.  •F e l i x• T 19:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Daskill 23:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Wl219 08:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * For a character who is a science fiction icon and perhaps a cultural icon, this article could be much better. Daskill 23:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Richy 11:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Millions of people around the world go to nightclubs, and have done so for decades, and yet the article is not very good. Needs a lot of work, especially the History Section. There are also no references.
 * Comments:
 * (put your reason for nomination) Richy 11:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Shrub of power 19:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  bibliomaniac  1  5  00:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) YankeeDoodle14 04:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Clay 06:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) kc12286 02:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)kc12286
 * 6) Scalene •UserPage•Talk•Contributions•Biography•Є • 08:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) GDonato (talk) 10:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) yoyo
 * 9) Wl219 12:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) S.dedalus 23:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Mrmoocow 23:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Fbv65'' e
 * 13) Sportsjam3 17:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) del'' / ☑t / ☛c || 22:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Oneworld25 05:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 02:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Alston
 * Comments:
 * This is a very important book in terms of literature and social and historical context, but it needs some serious work doing - it contains several lists and very few citations. Would like to do some work, but am very pushed for time at present. Shrub of power 19:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Nydas (Talk) 19:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ♠  TomasBat  20:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  SpL o T  // 13:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) -Flubeca (t) 23:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Bifgis 03:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Sportsjam3 15:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Psych less   22:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) (lemon flash)  talk  00:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) M&NCenarius 06:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Jeltz talk  13:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 11)  Y ar na lg o  talk to me 17:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 12)  Dark Falls''    talk 23:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Hydrogen Iodide 22:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Mcattell 01:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Every article about any fictional thing is likely to link here, but for such a fundamental article, it's pretty basic. With no pictures, few sources, no history of fiction and a weak overview, there's lots of work to do here. Nydas (Talk) 19:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

face="tahoma">ian ]] Talk 19:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support:
 * 1) (lemon flash)  talk  01:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -Flubeca (t) 23:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Sportsjam3 15:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Psych less   22:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Hydrogen Iodide 22:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) [[User:Scarian|Scar <font color="black"
 * 1) LordHarris 20:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- R'son-W (speak to me/breathe) 21:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Daskill 00:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 12:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) igordebraga ≠ 15:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * All of the other 5 Star Wars Episode's articles are at a featured status, and this one a good. If we improve on it, it should be a FA in no time. (lemon flash) talk  01:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Second that. Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 12:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) S.dedalus 21:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) mirageinred 04:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hydrogen Iodide 17:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Another one of those pervasive terms that is seen frequently in the news these days, and is quite controversial. This article needs lots of work and has been tag for cleanup since February! The article also possible has some POV problems. Thanks for your help! --S.dedalus 21:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) As nominator --EncycloPetey 04:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * I'm surprised that such a popular sport has such a terrible page. --EncycloPetey 04:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not terrible, just needs some references. -- Juliancolton (talk) 20:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 03:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Clamster 22:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * An iconic pop culture reference that needs to be improved upon greatly. --T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 03:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) As nominator Juliancolton (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) M&NCenarius (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Master Redyva (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 03:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) JPG-GR (talk) 05:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) SameDayService 00:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Acs 4b  T C U 18:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8)  WEBURIEDOURSECRETS  INTHEGARDEN  19:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Another potentially good article, that is just not that good. This article needs a lot of work. Juliancolton (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Another potentially good article, that is just not that good. This article needs a lot of work. Juliancolton (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  bibliomaniac  1  5  20:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  —ÅñôñÿMôús Dîššíd3nt 22:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC) This article can make it to Feautured, and it should!
 * 3) Bifgis 03:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ♠  TomasBat   ( @ )  ( Contribs )  ( Sign! ) 10:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Sir Reginald Aylmer Ranfurly Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-Drax 01:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Astrowob 14:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Jeltz  talk  22:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8)  —Zan orath 08:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Madris 03:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Sportsjam3 04:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This article was a DYK, and shows much promise. Poison was a commonly used tool, and its use has become quite an integral part of history  bibliomaniac 1  5  20:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Ezeu 18:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) LordHarris 14:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Dweller 16:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Darrenhusted 16:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Kaiser matias 09:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Z leitzen  (talk)  05:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Citi Cat  12:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8)  Bigr  Tex  14:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) BanyanTree 03:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Timrollpickering 09:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) njan 20:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Scorpion0422 04:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * A figure of historical importance, for many reasons. Potential to be a very interesting article. Edited by relatively few people, needs help to reach GA status. Also, consider the scarcity of Africa related articles with GA status. --Ezeu 18:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  Somebody Else's  Problem CatDog (aka Alethiophile) 20:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Lord Metroid 21:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Twerbrou 12:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Darrenhusted 16:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Jeltz talk  22:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This article is extremely controversial and needs to be fixed. The current group that's editing the article is polarized either pro- or anti-Falun Gong, so the article is pretty much locked into its current configuration as any major edit will start an edit war. It's an important issue that affects a lot of people. We need to fix this. Somebody Else's  Problem CatDog (aka Alethiophile) 20:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ohh dear, I never seen so many templates on one page before! Lord Metroid 21:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) LordHarris 15:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Jersey Devil 06:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * April 20, the anniversary of the Ludlow Massacre, seems a good day to nominate this article. This was an important event to organized labor, and should not be forgotten. Needs expansion in terms of description and aftereffects. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Jersey Devil 05:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  --Oneworld25 19:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Article is on the treaty which officially formed the Axis Powers of Germany, Italy and Imperial Japan in the onset of the Second World War. Yet the article has only one link in its external link section. Very little references. An article of this importance needs serious work and should be heavily cited.--Jersey Devil 05:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BlueLotas 23:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * BlueLotas 23:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It's good to fix mistakes where they have been criticized... but, this seems a little too narrow a topic to get many people interested... and it severely limits users by making them go to history journals and books which most people won't have easy access to. gren グレン 11:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) jwillburtalk 00:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  •F e l i x•  T 14:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Dalf | Talk 05:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Bifgis 20:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) M&NCenarius 08:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ♠  Tom   @  s  Bat   13:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments: Looks pretty bad, room for improvement, expansion, and such, doesn't look that long or detailed. Alphablast 21:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You do realise we collaborated on this three weeks ago? CloudNine 15:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You do realise we collaborated on this three weeks ago? CloudNine 15:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

No I didn't, but it still doesn't look any better. So its best to try again. Alphablast 12:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) ♠  Tom   @  s  Bat   22:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  ZeWrestler   Talk 23:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Monkeyblu e  13:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Defy 15:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Twerbrou 18:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Bifgis 03:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) -Flubeca (t) 16:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Sportsjam3 15:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Psych less   22:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) (lemon flash)  talk  00:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Very historically important article; plus, longest war (116 years) :) ♠  Tom  @  s  Bat   22:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Fxer 16:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ♠  TomasBat  20:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Bifgis 03:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Sportsjam3 15:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  Bigr  Tex  14:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Jeltz talk  13:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Fascinating piece of history, the mystery surrounding who made them and when, and assorted crackpot websites that attribute them to Atlantis etc. The web needs a credible article on the topic, so the people who said the Pyramids were upside-down UFO landing pads don't have the loudest voice :) Fxer 16:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) As nom. Hemlock Martinis 00:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 05:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Zginder 03:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Frequent vandalism has discouraged active improvement of this article. Let's fight back. --Hemlock Martinis 00:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Smallman12q (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The current article is lacking in sources and needs to be updated given the recent usage of the term. This month, a number of news articles have been written regarding the interpretation for the new world order.It should also be noted that the article recieves roughly 1.5k views a day(given the recent usage though, the article has recieved 3k hits a dayview count.--Smallman12q (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Zanimum 19:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ThePointblank 13:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The extensive recent press coverage of this article's edit war, twice on CBC Radio Charlottetown, once on CBC TV Charlottetown, on CBC.ca PEI and CBC.ca Manitoba, in the National Post, Montreal Gazette, PEI Guardian, on Canada.com. --  Zanimum 19:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The media circus surrounding the article and the intentions of the various editors is enough. As I said on the article's talk page, we as a collective whole as editors and contributors have to demonstrate we can produce articles that are excellent sources of information, that are reliable, non-biased, and ones as a whole, the community can be proud of, and we can use the media attention to show we can produce such article. ThePointblank 13:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Cat chi? 10:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Crushti 19:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ehjort 21:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The series of protest are among the largest in Turkish history as well as human history. Mind you, this article is about a current event that has been going on for the past month. There have already been 4 rallies and a 5th one is scheduled for this weekend, another is scheduled for 19 May. It is very overwhelming for a single person to try to maintain this article and I would welcome any assistance. When the rallies come to an end, I hope to have a near feature article. It will be very hard to write about the protests once they conclude. It would loose the historic perspective too. -- Cat chi? 10:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Wl219 06:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Mike Serfas 22:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) CJ 17:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  bibliomaniac  1  5  00:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Caponer 16:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Sportsjam3 17:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Flubeca t 16:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Oneworld25 05:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Dalf | Talk 05:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This article was recently demoted from featured article status due to a lack of citations. I think that can be pretty easily fixed given the amount of legal scholarship that's been written about it in the last 150 years. Wl219 06:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  Monkeyblu  e  04:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Universe=atom •Talk•Contributions• 09:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ♠  Tom   @  s  Bat   22:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Nemilar 04:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Brisv e  gas  05:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) -Flubeca (t) 23:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) ॐ Metta Bubble  puff  12:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) goodleh 19:50, 16 June 2007  (UTC)
 * 9) Psych less   22:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Sportsjam3 00:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Crocodile Punter 07:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Martinship 09:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Think outside the box 11:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) --Andersmusician  VOTE  04:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) LordHarris 20:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This article is central to many democracies and to the whole Freedom Concept series. I would like to nominate Freedom of speech by country too but I think Freedom of speech is more important/should come first. Thanks,  Monkeyblu e  04:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It should indeed be an FA. It is because of it that Wikipedia exists. Universe=atom •Talk•Contributions• 09:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I think this article, of all those listed here, could benefit most from the attention of many editors. It has broad appeal and worldwide importance, is a fundamental concept that can surely draw on better illustrations, and needs intensive copyediting to collapse the lists into subsections and paragraphs. Also, to do: wordwide view, additional references. Surely, something for everybody! --Martinship 09:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Clamster 04:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 03:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Master Redyva (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This page on an important topic is cluttered and completely unreferenced; should be organized in a similar way to legal drinking age Clamster 04:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Marlith   T / C  17:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Master Redyva (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Eurozone AA (talk) 17:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 03:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  K u k i ni  hablame aqui 06:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) SameDayService  23:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Daniel 5127 05:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Kaiser matias (talk) 08:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The Chinese Exclusion Act was an important chapter in the history of the US. I am surprised that it isn't already a GA. --Marlith  T / C  17:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I am doing my term paper on this, so I believe that I will have plenty to contribute. Marlith  T / C 05:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This event is most important event in the US History. Daniel 5127 05:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) As nom. -- Shark  face  217  18:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Decent, but should be great.   WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  play it cool.  19:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) --Avala (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I've been trying to get this article to FA for some time now. It's pretty decent in it's current state, but has the potential to be so much more. I think it would be a perfect project for those who enjoy contributing to ACID. -- Shark face  217  18:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Thedreamdied 01:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC) i'm the nominator.
 * 2) Tekaphor 07:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Good idea.
 * 3) AvB ÷  talk  10:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  bibliomaniac  1  5  00:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Guido den Broeder 01:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Citicat 02:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) JFW |  T@lk  21:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Renwick 01:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Feyandstrange 03:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) SadanYagci 03:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Sportsjam3 04:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The article about ME/CFS is unbelievably poor. This disease, whatever your personal opinion on it, is known to affect 4 million Americans and around 1 in 1000 people in Western populations. However, the article is unbelievably long, full of useless and biased information and as a resource is pretty poor. There are also continuing and unresolved arguments over lots of the information, and information about research and upcoming clinical trials, for instance, is mentioned either sparingly or not at all. This article may not interest you personally, but it is important that it is thoroughly improved to make it useful to the public. Please vote! Thedreamdied 01:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Last time I looked (admittedly years ago) the US estimate was 800,000 patients so I think I detect definition/dx criteria creep (not suggesting Thedreamdied is responsible for that; increasingly inclusive diagnostic criteria is seen as a big problem in ME/CFS advocacy). AvB ÷ talk  10:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I was going on the CDC estimate in their recent cfs public information drive, which said 4 million. Thedreamdied 13:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The CDC have different estimates in different publications. 800,000 sounds about right for the Fukuda definition. More accurate diagnosing should (more quickly) eliminate other diseases than ME from the CFS population and thereby reduce this number. I agree that the article is presently a total mess, it is more a collection of 'my two cents' bits than a proper lemma.--Guido den Broeder 01:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

 * The article is presently filled with poorly verified information added by people with an agenda. We need to be crystal clear on what can be included and what is out. I suggest small case series that have never been cited by a systematic review are not suitable.
 * In general I agree however I think that leaves out some very promising recent research such as this small study http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search&DB=pubmed Renwick 01:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

JFW | T@lk  21:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Creating a separate article on ME could help sorting things out, IMHO. The text as it is shows a lot of confusion about the relations between a number of entities. The related lemma on Post-viral fatigue syndrome also needs work.--Guido den Broeder 23:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You think so? It seems to me that they're all the same thing with different names - hence 'CFS/ME' in the US. Thedreamdied 00:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Having separate articles for ME and PVFS could confuse things even more, a ME or PVFS diagnosis isn't based on diagnostic tests that distinguish them from CFS, but perhaps the difference between chronic fatigue and CFS needs to be further highlighted. - Tekaphor 06:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * They're not quite the same, although they target the same patients. ME is a disease, CFS a syndrome. In practice this means that all ME-patients have CFS, while the diagnosis of CFS is (or should be) a temporary thing until it is established that the patient has ME, or not. Furthermore, some aspects of ME are typically not included in CFS criteria, and there is a long history of ME research from before CFS was even invented. Diagnosing ME is also quite different from diagnosing CFS.--Guido den Broeder 09:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with Tekaphor. To me, ME and CFS are broadly different words for the same thing, and thats how they are intended. Chronic Fatigue by itself is a totally different thing, its a symptom and not a disease. Thedreamdied 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

 * The article is too large, somewhat fragmented and needs more references for the controversial aspects of it. - Tekaphor 06:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that its FAR too large - it should be divided up into other articles if necessary, similar to the Multiple Sclerosis article. There also needs to be a much better lead, and the endless 'sniping' where one POV is followed by another is ridiculous. The article should be written from the POV that CFS is real, then there should be a clear section suggesting that some people/doctors believe it isnt. The etiology section is also appalling - the only serious etiologys are "its all in the head", "it doesnt exist at all", gene/immune problems, and persistent low grade viral infections. All the other rubbish is unsourced and really unneccessary. Thedreamdied 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A lot of the stuff in the etiology section may be useful but should be moved to a section called differential diagnosis/diseases with similar symptoms or something (which I think a lot of medical articles on rare/ hard to diagnose diseases should add). Celiac disease and arnold chiari malformation may cause similar symptoms but are definitely not the same thing as CFS/ME, they have their own articles and they do not need a lot of elaboration on the CFS/ME page. Also treatments should be listed in a single section not spead out in the etiology section- treatments for diseases such as celiac disease, allergies, etc. are already mentioned on their respective pages and shouldn't be on the CFS page at all. This section also lists tests such as testing for herpes virus/epstein barr virus, these should be moved to the testing/diagnosis section. Renwick 01:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There is also enough immunology information to warrant its own subsection. - Tekaphor 03:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Re-Renwick, i do see why it the etiology stuff should be kept, but maybe a seperate article on 'Chronic Fatigue' could have them, and then keep CFS/ME as a seperate page relating only to seriously proposed etiologies. Thedreamdied 13:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps the relevant information can be "strained" out and the rest deleted. - Tekaphor 15:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Any additions of information, removals of bad information, and anything else that could help a person understand the illness is greatly needed. Also, editing, fact checking, etc... SadanYagci 03:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) → Ed  Gl  22:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Mrmoocow
 * 3) RttM 17:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) M&NCenarius 17:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Jeltz talk  21:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Bifgis 20:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Pop culture references make up more than half of the article! → Ed Gl  22:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  Lεmση  flαsh  (t)  /  (c)  22:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Sportsjam3 17:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Topic that is searched on alot, so we need to add more information. Lεmση  flαsh  (t)  /  (c)  22:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

 * By the way, this article is also a Featured Article Candidate. Universe=atom •Talk•Contributions• 15:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) SunStar Net talk 18:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Dictouray 17:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Belazzur 08:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) M&NCenarius 08:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Universe=atom •Talk•Contributions• 16:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

1. I studied this in my GCSE geography. 2. It was also the subject of ITV's Police, Camera, Action! in the 1996 episode The Man Who Shot OJ Programme 2, about the Los Angeles News Service. Any help would be appreciated if you can: I would like this to be the Featured Article one day. If you want to help me or have any questions, leave a note on my talk page SunStar Net talk 18:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This is an article that is in decent shape so far, and is of personal interest to me for two reasons:

 * Support:
 * 1)  ZeWrestler   Talk 23:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide 01:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Very basic fundamental concept in Geography. There should be a plethora of information online for us to raise it to featured article status.  ZeWrestler   Talk 23:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Dekimasu よ!  02:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Milton 02:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) M&NCenarius 04:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  daniel  folsom  06:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Robert K S 12:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Nemilar 04:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Flubeca (t) 23:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) goodleh 20:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Think outside the box 13:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Sportsjam3 15:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Bsay USD  [Talk]  [contribs]  18:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 12)  Y ar na lg o  talk to me 17:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Beagel 15:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Annandale 17:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Hydrogen Iodide 22:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Psych less   22:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) Mcattell 21:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Article creation on a core topic! Until a few days ago this was being marked as a disambiguation page, although there is a separate dab page at Energy (disambiguation). It still looks like a list of links with a gallery instead of an article. Many important daughter pages (e.g. Energy (physics), Energy (social studies), Energy industry, Energy (biology), and Energy (chemistry)) have useful information that can be used to flesh this out. Whether or not this nomination succeeds, the list of links should be merged into the dab; if we can't make sense out of this as an article, I'll probably nominate it for deletion, because it doesn't convey any useful information like an encyclopedia article should. Dekimasu よ! 02:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Fully agree, and I think that a distinction should be made between the physical science concept of energy and the applied aspects of it: supply and environmental impact. Remember that applied aspects may already be covered (or should be) in fuel, electricity, renewable energy, nuclear power, World energy resources and consumption, etc. Spamsara 14:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This article and its family of articles have a long, complex, and contentious history. I support the major changes suggested above--in particular, a merger and elimination of the category subarticles--but the efforts of one particularly motivated editor would have to be overcome in order for progress to be made. Robert K S 12:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It is definitely a good idea to clean this up. I suggest moving Energy (physics) to be the main article. "Energy " should be merged or be made into sub-articles, and summarized an linked from the main article. Energy (chemistry)" should be merged into Thermodynamic potential. The current Energy should be merged into Energy (disambiguation). Articles that actually deal with Energy in a non-physics sense, such as Energy (psychological) can be left as they are. --PeR 15:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I notice that someone has already done the page move from "Energy (physics)". Hence, there is no longer a need for this article to be nominated for improvement. --PeR 16:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * There is still a need for improvement, and particularly, the attention of experts. The lead requires a lot of hammering out yet to make it concise and clear for the uninitiated reading without sacrificing correctness for simplicity. Robert K S 17:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

 * The pseudo-disambiguation page that was at the plain title is now at Energy (Disambiguation), and that needs to be merged and redirected to Energy (disambiguation). Dekimasu よ! 00:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) 132.216.228.230 13:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC) moved anon vote --Bsay USD  [Talk]  [contribs]  20:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) ♠  TomasBat   16:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) LordHarris 20:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Mcattell 21:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) M&NCenarius 02:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lemon flash  talk  22:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Spamsara 05:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  SpL o T  // 13:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Hydrogen Iodide 05:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) igordebraga ≠ 01:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Safe-Keeper 04:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 09:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Espresso Addict 16:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Iotha 01:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) WS 23:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Sportsjam3 04:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Timrollpickering 22:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) --  Anonymous Dissident  Talk 10:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) Shruti14 ( talk • contribs ) 15:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Seaaron 16:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * An extremely important article which certainly deserves some work. It currently rated as B class, meaning that it isn´t in very bad shape, but, due to the importance of the article, it really should be an FA. ♠  TomasBat  16:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Not too bad article, but could use improvement. Shruti14 ( talk • contribs ) 15:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) John Carter 20:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ♠  TomasBat   21:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hydrogen Iodide 05:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 01:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Only a Start-class article. Say what you want to about smoking, but it is an extremely important subject and it deserves a better article than it currently has. John Carter 20:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The start-class label was a bit outdated so I upgraded to B-class, since it's 44 k without template, table or list-cruft. It has noticeable info gaps in sociology, medicine, physiology, public health effects and modern history, but has a far superior overall coverage when compared to, for example, tobacco smoking. Peter Isotalo 11:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) 82.71.48.158 19:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Seaaron 16:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Boy1jhn 20:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Shrewpelt 19:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Hydrogen Iodide 05:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Baridiah 22:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Jeltz  talk  11:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 01:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Short article (six paragraphs and a listy section). Important environmental, freshwater/marine biology, fishery topic. Lots of people live in river deltas. I'm guessing around 500 million worldwide (for instance, about 60 million in Vietnam and between 115 and 143 million in the Ganges delta), sometimes to ill effect. 82.71.48.158 19:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This seems like an important environmental article. I'm surprised it's so short for such a large topic. Shrewpelt 19:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) --  Anonymous Dissident  Talk 09:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ♠  TomasBat   14:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Iotha 08:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Bigr  Tex  15:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Cloachland 13:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Hydrogen Iodide 22:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Alvin6226  talk 21:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Boy1jhn 20:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) --Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 20:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 15:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Think outside the box 11:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Zginder 12:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Separa 20:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) User:Supershow Showmanship is the key 22:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) RJH (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) --Avala 19:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) AZ t 21:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) EamonnPKeane 20:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Mtmelendez (Talk 13:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 20)  K u k i ni  hablame aqui 16:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Marlith   T / C  03:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) M&NCenarius 21:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * I really haven't had much to do with this article (I might have reverted vandalism on it once or twice ;)), but I feel that such an import subject matter as the atom deserves improvement from the shape this article is in at the moment. I hope others share my view. Cheers -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 09:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Article also nominated on SCotM. — RJH (talk) 17:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) EncycloPetey 17:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) BorgQueen 17:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hardyplants 19:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Aelwyn 12:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 23:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Wilchett 22:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Dekimasu よ!  15:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This is a core article, but there is no COTW for WP:PLANTS. There is a lot of good information, and I've done a little work already, but there is still a lot to be done.  This can and should be a Featured article. --EncycloPetey 17:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 05:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) EncycloPetey 12:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 05:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Re-nomination. Being one of the core topics and a complex subject, worthy of a group effort. --BorgQueen 05:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This article was not chosen the first time fair and square. --Zginder 23:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) As nominator --Juliancolton 00:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Zginder (talk) 02:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) M&NCenarius (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Such and important subject, yet, such a small page.Juliancolton 00:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Per nom. Mgiganteus1 11:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 02:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Totnesmartin 11:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC) This gets a few lines and some fake wrestler gets an FA. Unbelievable.
 * 4) ♠  TomasBat   14:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Think outside the box 15:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) M&NCenarius 18:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) ff m  00:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Master Redyva (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden (talk) 15:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Twerbrou (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Very important topic. Ridiculously short article. Mgiganteus1 11:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Should have been a redirect to gastrointestinal tract. Separa 13:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I took the liberty of completing the merge. There are a huge number of redirected links to that page, which, hopefully, a bot will clean up one of these days... =) — RJH (talk) 17:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Should this nomination be removed as a result of the merger? Zginder 03:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Probably yes, or at least be placed on hold Nergaal (talk)

 * Support:
 * 1)  Bryan Hopping  T  05:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Marlith  (Talk)   18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This article gets over 1,000 hits a day and is one of the only internet sources of unbiased information on the topic. -- Bryan Hopping T  05:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BenB4 07:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Dalf | Talk 21:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * An important subject of considerable relevance to the problems of energy dependence and climate change. BenB4 07:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Madris 02:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  SpL o T  // 09:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Sportsjam3 15:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) YankeeDoodle14 19:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oneworld25 05:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * I feel that such an important component in biology, human development, and geology needs a more in depth article on its biological role and especially its use in human historyMadris 02:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It gave its name to a whole age, so is historically crucial and should be better than B-class.
 * If this isn't in Wikipedia, then the whole periodic table should be thrown out if that's what taking this article out means. Iron is such an important part of human construction.  I cannot believe this could be gone.

 * Support:
 * 1) CloudNine 11:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ZayZayEM 10:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Thedreamdied 13:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jeltz  talk  18:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Derwig 20:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * The article name might need improving (Tool or technology?), but this is an important subject to cover. Species, apart from humans, can utilise simple tools. Information on this is spread throughout Wikipedia though, and there's no article to summarise this. CloudNine 11:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It might help to have a proper link to an article first. All I see is a redlink. Kaiser matias 23:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that this is the Article Creation and Improvement Drive :). I might be able to write a quick stub though. CloudNine 19:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Yes! We need to know what they are up to. I like the usage of "technology" as opposed to tools (covers farming and construction as well as just tools).--ZayZayEM 10:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, although i'm wondering if this article doesn't already exist under another name. Thedreamdied 13:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah. thinking the same thing but the Technology article links to this one. Jeltz talk  18:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've searched through Wikipedia, and can't find anything that covers the same subject. CloudNine 19:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Also Animal cognition, and Category:Tool-using species — Jack · talk · 06:14, Wednesday, 25 April 2007
 * Tool also covers this subject. -- Beland 22:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Gutworth 02:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 03:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jeltz  talk  22:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  bibliomaniac  1  5  22:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Guy Fuchsia 14:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) User:Madris Madris 03:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Mrmoocow 23:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) - Flubeca t 19:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 9)  Lεmση  flαsh  (t)  /  (c)  22:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) $$\sim$$ Lenoxus " * " 15:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 11)  ZeWrestler   Talk 14:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 12)  •F e l i x• T 17:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Sportsjam3 04:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This article is currently referred to by Mediawiki:Loginend and right now has 3 tags on top. This article needs help! Gutworth 02:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I myself found the article through Loginend and realized that it is getting major exposure of a sort we don't always think about (rather than being a really popular topic in its own right). $$\sim$$ Lenoxus " * " 15:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  ZeWrestler   Talk 23:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  ♠  TomasBat  00:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Important Web 2.0 concept. Given the changing dynamics of the internet this should be a good article that we could improve upon.  Especially with the amount of websites that have tagging these days.  ZeWrestler   Talk 23:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Consider merge with folksonomy. Spamsara 16:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Showmanship is the key 16:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Think outside the box 14:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments: The paragraphs tend to drag and its kind of nauseating throughout the article. Needs an enhanced Table of contents. That's really all.

 * Support:
 * 1) Kotare 07:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  themcman1  talk 15:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 20:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ♠  TomasBat   20:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ZeWrestler   Talk 12:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Jeltz talk  11:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Hydrogen Iodide 17:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Duran 20:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Doradus 04:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 13:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Lapsed Pacifist 21:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Marlith   T / C  03:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This article is desperately in need of attention; A military invention which has shaped the course of history ever since, this article doesn't have even one inline citation and could do with major expansions with regards to the history of use of this weapon.

 * Support:
 * 1) Bonus Onus 03:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Bifgis 20:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) RC 04:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Popular Mechanics has been a very influential magazine in the coverage of science and technology for over 100 years. Certainly throughout its history it has had cultural significance as a leading American technology publication. The current article is very short (barely two paragraphs) and says nothing of the magazine's history, significant issues or coverage, or recent events concerning the magazine. Compare with the article for Wired, which I would consider to be a relatively good article about a magazine. --Bonus Onus 03:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) -  Flubeca t 19:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The weapon used in the United States for lots of wars, and is only a start article - Flubeca t 19:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 00:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Zginder 13:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Duran 20:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This article was a previous winner of the Core topics collaboration, and certainly got improved since. However it still needs a lot of work. --BorgQueen 00:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 03:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ZeWrestler   Talk 03:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) RayBeckerman 22:02, 4 November 2007

 * Comments:
 * An important topic in our digital age. Much work is needed. --BorgQueen 03:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) --Indianstar 05:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Wragge 21:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) DancingPenguin 23:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This is very important subject in view of continuous increase in Global oil price. Article has lot of scope for improvement in terms of style, presentation and neutrality. This will be one of the most referred article in near future when Oil price touches $100/Barrel. It is essential to improve quality of this article at the earliest --Indianstar 05:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * There's a mass of interesting information (and 100 cited sources) in this article, but the organization and presentation could be improved quite easily. --Wragge 21:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 20:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 05:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Needs some cleanup, and more citations. The lead paragraph should be expanded. --BorgQueen 20:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Beagel 15:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Martinship 09:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ♠  TomasBat   21:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Hydrogen Iodide 22:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Philbentley 16:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Oil shale is a promising source of unconventional oil to deal with diminishing conventional oil reserves. It deserves more attention. Beagel 15:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Secret account 15:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) mav (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * another broadly accessible article, just throwing up some alternatives. --Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per The Assault on Reason ;) Jack Merridew 13:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

cs:Wikipedie:WikiProjekt Kvalita/Spolupráce měsíce simple:Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive

 * Support:
 * 1) — Rod talk 16:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * (This article is about a proposed tidal energy scheme with over 150 years of history. It involves; environment, transport, ecology, economics - something for everyone! However it is a mass of cleanup tags (Articles needing additional references (Mar 2008, Nov 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Mar 2008, Nov 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2007, Jul 2008, Aug 2008), Wikipedia articles in need of updating), with accusations of original research, bias etc from those who have strong feelings on the proposal. I think it is an important topic which needs lots of help from "impartial" editors to improve its quality.) --— Rod talk 16:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) — Jack · talk · 17:35, Thursday, 12 April 2007
 * 2) Eureka!  bibliomaniac  1  5  21:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) — Pious7Talk Contribs  21:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) M&NCenarius 19:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) LordHarris 14:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Astrowob 17:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Coemgenus 13:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Diez2 16:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) 210physicq  (c ) 00:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * To say this state is the third largest, most populous, largest economic power in the US, the article ain't up to scratch. International powerhouse in terms of music, film and electronics — Jack · talk · 17:35, Thursday, 12 April 2007

 * Support:
 * 1) Felixboy 14:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Astrowob 17:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) LordHarris 15:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) M&NCenarius 00:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Lacking in areas compared to articles on other cities of its size. Already have to-do list and peer review. Felixboy 14:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Adam78 10:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Wl219 13:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Astrowob 14:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Dami 19:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) –  Alensha   talk  19:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 01:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Mrmoocow 23:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) as extremely interesting. Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) - Flubeca t 21:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) gren グレン 11:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Dalf | Talk 04:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Bifgis 20:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 13)  Kurykh  03:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Universe=atom •Talk•Contributions• 17:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * It could be a really useful article to review the major geopolitical changes of the 20th-21st centuries. There are blanks in the knowledge of all of us (for example, it was a surprise to me that a country named Eritrea exists – because it wasn't until 1993 that it was created and it was just missing from my atlas) and it would be interesting to see how the worldscape differed from the present one just a couple of decades ago and how it changed over time to reach its today's state. There are useful articles available as resources in its "See also" section. Adam78 10:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Seems interesting. Wl219 13:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Very good article idea. Astrowob 14:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * This is really cool. I'd definitely love to help. --Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 01:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I remember, say two years ago, seeing some incredibly successful article collaborations which I rarely see today. I think it was because there was lots of information available both online or already on Wikipedia.  Although this isn't the greatest topic, I think it's a great one for collaboration because it doesn't require specialty sources. gren グレン 11:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * A really cool topic. :) Universe=atom •Talk•Contributions• 17:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Twerbrou 14:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Kaiser matias 21:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Dalf | Talk 03:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Astrowob 17:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Coemgenus 13:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ~  Bigr  Tex  14:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) M&NCenarius 00:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8)  bibliomaniac  1  5  00:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Flubeca 19:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Caponer 15:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) --ISOLA'd ELBA 23:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Felix 12:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Mrmoocow 23:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Page of an important country, which has a lot of spelling and grammatical problems, and the history part (that's the furthest I got) goes over huge times of history in one giant leap. Why where they together with Lithuania and why was that bond dissolved, for instance. Twerbrou 14:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) ↔NMajdan •talk  15:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Okiefromokla 22:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Bigr  Tex  14:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) PatricknoddyTALK (reply here) | HISTORY  11:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Astrowob 14:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * The Oklahoma Centennial is on November 16 of this year and it would be great if this article was improved to Featured status by that day.↔NMajdan •talk 15:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * POV-ridden throughout edit history. Worth working on as an interesting and important phenomenon. Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Alphablast 20:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * We need this a FA so badly, its a city, and the article is in need of major improvement, so it can be included in the CD selection or even just get it to GA, so we need a team that can work on the information from Peer review/Sunderland/archive1 and Peer review/Sunderland/archive2. Alphablast 20:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Punkmorten 18:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  •F e l i x•  T 18:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Dictouray 21:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Horrid article, capital city and thus rated as top-importance. Punkmorten 18:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I've never seen a capital city article in condition this bad!  •F e l i x• T 18:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Billy227, Review my account!! talk contribs sndbx usbx 01:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * A pretty good article currently. Needs expansions and some more citations. A picture gallery would probably be good too. Overall, needs some improvement. -Billy227, Review my account!! talk contribs sndbx usbx 01:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Nathanww 22:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --VovanA 11:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hektor 08:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Dojarca 11:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 12:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This article just gained a lot more importance(chosen as the city for the Winter Olympics in 2014) and it's only a B-class.
 * It's had 100 edits since yesterday. I don't think a collaboration is needed for this article. Spamsara 03:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Extremely important article, since one of the most prestigious events in sports is going to be held there. Definitely should be an FA. Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 12:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

 * 2014? Why the urgency now? Sochi is under 3 active wikiprojects, I'm sure they don't need us. Totnesmartin 20:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) JoshuaArgent 04:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 17:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  ZeWrestler   Talk 17:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ♠  TomasBat   20:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Phgao 07:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Dfrg.msc 09:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This article would be considered Very Important and I and many other people (me being Tasmanian) would want that small amount of improvement needed to push this article all the way. --JoshuaArgent 04:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

color="brown">T ]]/ C 01:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Support:
 * 1) Master Redyva (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Marlith  [[User_Talk:Marlith|<font
 * 216.64.117.227 (talk) 15:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC) (Sure, I'll vote).
 * Vote not counted because IP's can not vote. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 00:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

3.SameDayService 23:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Falls of Neuse Road is the first article is a series of articles I would like to do for Streets in Raleigh, NC. If I can get this to be an actual article, I will add photos and possibly a map. Please be kind and vote for this article. --Master Redyva (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. Please review the article. The road is notable. It has history, current and past. It is not just a road. I have tried to clean the article up to get rid of non-encyclopedic phrasing. With work, this could be a better article, even providing information for people in Yellowknife.  Master Redyva (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge SameDayService 23:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Salix alba (talk) 23:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  SpL o T  // 11:19, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  bibliomaniac  1  5  04:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * A rather unsexy topic with a very rich history going back to the dawn of time. So much could be said and so little has been. --Salix alba (talk) 23:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Guy Fuchsia 23:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  SpL o T  // 09:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Mrmoocow 23:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * It's absurd how underdeveloped this article is, considering how well-known the topic is. I imagine anyone with even the slightest understanding of casinos could easily find something to add or reference. Guy Fuchsia 23:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  bibliomaniac  1  5  01:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Dalf | Talk 22:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) M&NCenarius 22:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) KZ  Talk • Contribs 07:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Themcman1 15:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Flubeca 15:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC) I saw a documentary on pandas. It's a subject needing FA status
 * 7) Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 06:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Darrenhusted 16:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Kaiser matias 09:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Astrowob 14:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Brisv e  gas  02:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 12)  —ÅñôñÿMôús Dîššíd3nt 03:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * The Giant Panda is one of the most beloved animals, even reaching up to enter the logo of the WWF. A collaboration should be done.  bibliomaniac 1  5  01:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Ilse@ 13:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Stlemur 16:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Daniel11 22:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Felixboy 20:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Jeltz  talk  22:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Worldwide export beer, but little information on Wikipedia. – Ilse@ 13:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure how much you can say about the beer itself; rewrite what's there, add a few bits and pieces, and merge into Heineken International? --Stlemur 16:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think the company, its subsidiaries (e.g. Brand, Wieckse Witte in NL) deserve some more. I agree with Stlemur the Heineken and Heineken Intnl should be merged, IMHO as Heineken, with a redirect from Heineken Intnl. Arnoutf 18:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Heineken International is the general article about the multinational with something like 120 brands, Heineken Pilsener about the lager beer. – Ilse@ 18:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC) (minor change Ilse@ 07:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC))
 * Support but I am proposing a mrege. Felixboy 20:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Ixistant 00:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ehjort 21:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Sportsjam3 04:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * For such an important, world renowned magazine, it sure does have a pretty dismal wiki entry. Should DEFINATELY be worked on for FA status! Ixistant 00:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  *** Clamster 23:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Mrmoocow 00:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Book series by Lemony Snicket with thirteen books and a handful of spin-off books. The article is plagued by speculation and unsourced statements. Hopefully, it can be brought up to par with Harry Potter, a similar type of series. This page and other closely related pages are primarily edited by users who have read and are fans of the books. Some input from those less familar with the series would be very helpful. *** Clamster 23:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just a note here again, I've started a to-do list with some suggestions of improving the article. Anyway, I support. Mrmoocow 00:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  *** Clamster 20:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jeltz talk  21:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -  Flubeca t 21:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Lεmση  flαsh  (t)  /  (c)  00:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Brisv e  gas  11:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  SpL o T  // 14:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * For such a common item, the page is fairly short and very disorganized. *** Clamster 20:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I was thinking the same thing - Flubeca t 21:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * So was I. Lεmση  flαsh  (t)  /  (c)  00:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I like it. It's quirky yet practical. Brisv e  gas  11:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Telcourbanio 13:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Dalf | Talk 05:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Richy 11:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Doppelganger 17:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  SpL o T  // 14:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ♠  Tom   @  s  Bat   21:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * It is a well known notable drink, and basically the article has seemed to have been left to rot with hardly any refs, and needing heavy cleanup and a number of other improvements. It is having a peer review, (which is being blatantly ignored), and generally a task force of users is needed to get it to GA. Telcourbanio Care for a talk? 13:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BlueLotas 19:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  ♠  TomasBat  22:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Sportsjam3 15:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Bigr  Tex  14:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * One of the most covered songs; this article is a mess. There's a trivia section. Faulty information, no infobox. BlueLotas 19:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, we could surely work on it. ♠  TomasBat  22:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

 * No one else? ۝ ۞ ░ 20:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) LordRobert 05:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

LordRobert 05:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This collection of Charlie Chaplin's finest silent era films has been overlooked for a long time. I created the article yesterday and due to an astounding amount of information available, was able to write a lot on it. As it is Chaplin's best, it deserves the best article it can have.

 * Support:
 * 1) Spamsara 14:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Derwig 16:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) (lemon flash)  talk  00:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Weenie beenie 11:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Twerbrou 18:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ♠  TomasBat  20:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  SpL o T  // 13:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Sportsjam3 15:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Huge tourism industry associated with this term, but article is a stub! Compare with our coverage of the web browser of the same name. Spamsara 14:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * A shameTwerbrou 18:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  Y ar na lg o  talk to me 17:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Robert Beck 14:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Sportsjam3 04:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * It is a recent issue that brought national attention to the team and the players, not to mention partly ruining some of the players lives. It deserves a good article as it will soon be part of history. Y ar na lg o  talk to me 17:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 23:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Nydas (Talk) 10:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ♠  TomasBat   22:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Hydrogen Iodide 22:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * One of the most important topics in social, economic, and legal perspectives. In its current awful condition, the article badly needs some group effort. --BorgQueen 23:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) SriMesh |  talk  04:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) fishhead2100talk contributions 11:53, July 10 2007
 * 3) Ultraflame 15:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Shanemcd 22:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Victor D PARLE  03:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Delzen 05:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Freechild (BoomCha) 03:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Dbiel (Talk) 09:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Bearian 20:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Hawker Typhoon 03:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Universe=atom Talk•Contributions 09:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Brandon Christopher 04:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Patrick 21:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Sportsjam3 04:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Marlith   T / C  01:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Timrollpickering 22:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) --Qmwne235 14:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) Dl2000 03:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Michalkun 08:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Celebrate the Centennial University of Saskatchewan Anniversary in the year 2007 Please help Celebrate the Anniversary of the U of S Talk Help to bring it to feature status !!!SriMesh | talk  04:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Work needs to be done on expanding the sections - specifically the individual buildings. Hawker Typhoon 03:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Shrewpelt 13:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 14:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Clamster 23:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This article was nominated before, and it needs a lot of work. Shrewpelt 13:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This article was nominated at least twice before and needs a lot of serious work as it is a extremely popular series. On of its major problems is the lack of sources. Clamster 23:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It doesn’t look all that bad to me. It’s been rated a B-Class. Why do you think WP:ACID is necessary for this article? --S.dedalus 00:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * While I would normally wholeheartedly endorse this, it's currently a GA candidate so I would rather wait for that to be settled before any other decisions are made. Mrmoocow 06:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Zginder 01:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 17:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ♠  TomasBat   20:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This article needs work. This is a very important subject. --Zginder 01:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  AJUK    Talk!! 12:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 23:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Think outside the box 11:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Phgao 07:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Seems to be a very small article for what it is --  AJUK   Talk!! 12:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) --TheTall One  19:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Avala 19:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 23:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ♠  TomasBat   20:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This article has huge potential, with many areas the article can expand to. I feel that the article could be something similar to Toilets in Japan with the randomness, yet interesting feel to it Some attention is needed, with a cleanup in the references section and further expansion in the lead and each of the licenses available. --TheTall One 19:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) ♠  TomasBat   20:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 20:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ZeWrestler   Talk 04:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) JQF • Talk • Contribs 02:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  JACO  PLANE  • 2007-09-24 10:03
 * Comments:
 * A notable topic (the board's little logo images are commonly seen on videogame boxes); article is not in a very bad condition, but could certainly do with some more work. ♠  TomasBat  20:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) ♠  TomasBat   23:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 01:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Think outside the box 12:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) zenohockey 04:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * An article in not a very good shape in proportion to its high level of notability; plus, sort of short and a bit too much of a plain list. Would certainly need more work; deserves to be an FA. ♠  TomasBat  23:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) ♠  TomasBat   18:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 07:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Rob C. alias Alarob 07:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Marlith  T / C  01:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Think outside the box 11:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ZeWrestler   Talk 16:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * "One of the oldest and most famous riddles still in use in the English language." (sentence extracted from article) ♠  TomasBat  18:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I've been watching this article for some time and have revised some essay-like passages without simply hacking them out. The article borders on WP:OR and some help with finding reliable secondary material would do much to help get this bird to the other side. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 01:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) RC 04:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 07:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * A notable article that is not in good shape. It needs more work and deserves to be a GA. Thanks! --RC 04:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Article also contains sections with no content. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 07:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Katsam 07:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 23:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * This could be a really great article. But it's a topic which people feel obsessive about and so a) it gets bogged down in weird details sometimes and b) it attracts a lot of new/inexperienced/one-topic editors (including me).  I think that with the attention of some old hand Wikipedians it could reach Featured Article status.Katsam 07:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Kaldari 19:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) John Carter 18:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This Core Biography article is in sad shape. Sun Tzu wrote The Art of War and his writing is still considered influential today. His Wikipedia article, however, is barely more than a stub. --Kaldari 19:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, I agree. However, as per the article itself, the subject is one about whom very little, if anything, seems to be known. I don't know how to improve an article when there is apparently very little information on the subject available. Do you have any ideas? Alternately, if the article is, as is, basically complete, there does exist ample precedent that it could be nominated for possibly even FA despite its brevity. Maybe something like that might be the way to go. John Carter 19:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Narco 23:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ♠  TomasBat   01:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 02:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Kaldari 20:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Phgao 07:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Zginder 12:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Think outside the box 12:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * I realize this may be better suited for WP:USCOTW (where I nominated it with "TBA" in case the drive ever becomes active), but as Geography of New Jersey is a fairly popular nominee here, I figured it couldn't hurt. I mentioned at Talk:Texas Straw Poll that the use of these polls for the Republican Party (United States) has exploded in light of the lack of a front runner candidate for President of the United States, and other uses aren't even covered. --Narco 23:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Zginder 12:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) BorgQueen 14:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 16:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * The Sat is a very important test for everyone trying to get into college in the U.S. this article should have featured status. --Zginder 12:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The SAT is not important outside the US; it makes a poor choice for a collaboration. --EncycloPetey 03:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 09:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Bronayur 00:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * A complex topic. The article seriously needs a major cleanup. --BorgQueen 09:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This article needs some teamwork. --Bronayur 00:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 09:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Amphis 10:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Funper 16:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Such an important body part deserves a better article. --BorgQueen 09:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Such an important body part deserves better understanding. --Funper 16:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 17:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  ZeWrestler   Talk 05:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 05:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * A legendary anime series of an epic scale. --BorgQueen 17:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) BorgQueen 19:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * Culturally significant topic. The article requires a general cleanup and more citations. --BorgQueen 19:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) John Carter 19:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Blueboar 19:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC) (already an involved editor, but happy to collaborate).
 * 3) ALR 14:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC) (again, already involved but interested to see if anyone can come up with anything innovative)

 * Comments:
 * An article with a very good amount of information from one side of the discussion available. Unfortunately, this has a tendency to make the article one-sided and very POV. A historically significant article that would definitely benefit from the input of neutral, objective outsiders. --John Carter 19:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Bobbacon (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Hydrogen Iodide  (HI!) 03:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) SameDayService 00:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Daniel 5127 05:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * A very important and old school in Scotland that deserves a much improved article. --WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This school is 750 years old with a lot of history. Bobbacon (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This school has a long history in Scotland which deserves an improved article. Daniel 5127 05:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Is the USA really a B-class article ? Master Redyva   ♠  17 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Chris! ct 21:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Trance addict 03:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Postlebury (talk) 01:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * This article looks like a mess. I am trying to improve it and I need help. --Chris! ct 21:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) — Jack · talk · 12:50, Friday, 21 December 2007
 * 2) Postlebury (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Shark face  217  20:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Treehouse372 (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Dumelow (talk) 12:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Second largest tourist attraction in Scotland, and has accomplished many milestones in conservation — Jack · talk · 12:50, Friday, 21 December 2007
 * Wow i can't believe this hasn't been brought up before...

 * Support:
 * 1)  Durova Charge! 09:04, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) PKM (talk) 18:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Shark face  217  20:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Treehouse372 (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) SRauz (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Kakofonous (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Nydas (Talk) 12:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) 4u1e (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) NuclearWinner (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) Mattyness (talk) 22:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * A core topic (one of Wikipedia's 150 most important subjects) but start-class article flagged for multiple problems. Happens to be on a subject where nearly everyone can help.  Join in!  -- Durova Charge! 09:04, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Important Topic, much! -Treehouse372 (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) Samsara (talk • contribs) 07:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) JPG-GR (talk) 21:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Cheers. Trance addict 20:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) MightyWarrior (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 5)    Drance      I know 7    19:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Neurogeek (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) 4u1e (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 8)  Shark  face  217  03:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) Tenbergen (talk) 00:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) - Milk's  Favorite  Cookie  23:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) jwandersTalk 07:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Underdeveloped article on one of the most important sauces. Take a look at Ketchup to see what I mean. Contains none of the science on mustard, e.g. effects on carcerogenic substances in barbequeued meats. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 07:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I wonder if we could get the scientists at Poupon U. to collaborate on this?  (Seriously, this would be an interesting feature article in the local paper here.)  Neurogeek (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1)  ZeWrestler   Talk 16:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) MightyWarrior (talk) 10:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * A small article I created over the summer, which hasn't gotten any attention since August. The article is on a unique creature that has information about it available on the internet. I figure I'd nominate it here to get the some editors to look at the article and possibly add something to it.  -- ZeWrestler   Talk 16:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Elephant shrews were in the news recently, although not this particular species (it was a Grey-faced Sengi). -- MightyWarrior (talk) 10:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) HarrisonB - Talk 07:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) OSX (talk • contributions) 08:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) --Solumeiras (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 4)  Shark face  217  03:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) - Milk's  Favorite  Cookie  23:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) James086 Talk |  Email 08:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * The Ford Falcon is an iconic Australian car, and has been for over 47 years. The current state of the article is a mess, such as underdeveloped and 'messy' sections etc. --HarrisonB - Talk 07:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Even though I'm a Holden fan this is without question a very significant car and should have a better article. James086 Talk |  Email 08:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Support:
 * 1) 86.159.78.45 (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Comments:
 * (Its a potentially very useful article yet is terribly structured and is no way near complete - may be difficult to complete in 1 week but its possible and can be a nice little challenge:)) --86.159.78.45 (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Restarting all three above, to give it some extra time while this is up and running. Secret account 22:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

fa:ویکی‌پدیا:همکاری هفته/برداشته شده


text: User talk:82.70.131.62

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:82.70.131.62


text:
Talk:Yosa Buson

Untitled
I think (after Google, e.g. ) that Yosa Buson's name is in the Japanese order, so his surname is Yosa, so he should be referred to in the article as "Yosa", not as "Buson". What do you think? -- Adam78 23:38, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Yosa is his surname. In general, Japanese haiku poets are refered to by their given name or more likely their haigo (haiku pen name). Thus Masaoka Shiki is usually called Shiki, Matsuo Bashō is called Bashō, and Kobayashi Issa is called Issa. Blank Verse   ∅  00:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Blank Verse is right--it's customary to refer to him as Buson. He didn't even use the name Yosa until relatively late in life. Some source texts claim that his surname was Taniguchi, and late 19th and early 20th century publications often refer to him as Taniguchi Buson. Modern scholars, however, call him Yosa Buson, and Buson when using only one name. Kyoho 16:18, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Death date
With this edit Buson's death date has been changed from December 25, 1783 to January 17, 1784, without explanation (apart from the edit summary "err. date"). 1783 is supported by Haruo Shirane (Early Modern Japanese Literature, 2008), Robin D. Gill (The Fifth Season, 2007), Cheryl Crowley (Haikai Poet Yosa Buson and the Bashō Revival, 2007) among other heavyweights, so I am reverting. If there is credible conflicting evidence, then let's discuss that here with a view to achieving consensus. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 11:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't wish to argue one way or another. Just wanted to point out that the difference between these dates is exactly the difference between old Japanese lunar and modern（western) calendar, i.e. Tenmei 3, 12th month, 25th day in lunar calendar corresponds to January 17, 1784 in modern/western calendar. Also, in my experience there is quite some mess in non-Japanese language references regarding dates, with some authors translating dates in the traditional lunar calendar one to one to modern dates. bamse (talk) 23:43, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Improve this Article!
There is a very nice article on Buson in russian, of excellent quality. Somebody should commission a translation from some russian speaking friend! 112.80.243.178 (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Yosa Buson


text:
Category:Pachycephalidae

 * Pachycephalidae is a family of the suborder Passeri.

title: Category:Pachycephalidae


text:
Višňová

Višňová may refer to places in the Czech Republic:

 * Višňová (Jindřichův Hradec District), a municipality and village in the South Bohemian Region
 * Višňová (Liberec District), a municipality and village in the Liberec Region
 * Višňová (Příbram District), a municipality and village in the Central Bohemian Region

title: Višňová


text: User talk:69.132.211.217

title: User talk:69.132.211.217


text: User talk:70.149.143.60

title: User talk:70.149.143.60


text:
User:Vanished user svinet8j3ogifm98wjfgoi3tjosfg/monobook.js

// User:Lupin/popups.js

mw.loader.load(            'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js'             + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s');


text: Template:NYCRR

title: Template:NYCRR