text:
Talk:T. R. Knight

Discussion
The text of this article, particularly the second paragraph, is nearly verbatim off the ABC bio page. --Christopherlin 06:00, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

School TR Knight went to the Academy of Holy Angels for high school...tom

Name
I think his name is actually TR (no periods) Knight. This may require a renaming of the article....I'm going to do more research, but in the credits, it's TR Knight. (unsigned comment)

Totally apropos of nothing - I realized why he goes by TR Knight - 'cause otherwise he'd be Ted Knight - and there already was a Ted Knight! NickBurns 19:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

T. R. stands for Theodore Raymond. He has been called T. R. (with the periods) since he was a baby. He said so on The Ellen DeGeneres Show last week.

Disclosing sexuality
He just came out to People magzine.

http://people.aol.com/people/article/0,26334,1548317,00.html

and he ROCKS for doing so, whatever prompted him to do it! (unsigned comment)

He addressed the fact that he is gay, not that he is homosexual. Calling someone homosexual is antiquated and implies that it is a clinical pathology. No where in his statements did he say "homosexual." Please respect Mr. Knight and get it right - he has addressed the fact that he is GAY. Get with the times, people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AMK390 (talk • contribs) October 19, 2006

 * It is true that on wikipedia we usually use the term the person prefers. Do you have an external source that confirms this? HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 03:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

 * My understanding is that a homosexual is a man, a lesbian is a woman, and gay covers both. I don't think either of the three terms are "antiquated"; but I *do* think that the term "gay" has been co-opted as an insult or derogatory adjective describing people and things NOT homosexual or lesbian, mostly by the small-minded. He did call himself "gay", and not "homosexual", so I think we should respect that. Weirdoactor 12:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Weirdoactor, sorry to say your understanding is wrong. The term "homosexual" can and has applied to a man or a woman, as does gay. Lesbian applies only to women. It is more rare to have a woman be referred to as "homosexual" since the term "lesbian" so specifically addresses that.

I can see AMK390's point that the word "homosexual" does sound a bit more clinical. I'm also sure that it might have been an honest mistake from the original poster. In any case, the article currently reflects his statement. Thanks! NickBurns 19:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Homosexual simply means "liking the same gender" (as opposed to heterosexual, which means "liking the opposite gender"). Connatations aside, there is no difference in the two words. The fact that TR chose to say "gay" instead of "homosexual" doesn't mean he dislikes the term. It's just more casual and more oftenly used in everyday language. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.224.198.163 (talk) 22:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC).

 * Very few gay people actually object to being referred to as "homosexual", and if you asked a gay person, more than likely he or she would say they were not bothered by it. Be that as it may, to clarify on a factual level (instead of all of the opinionated blabbering going on here,) the term "homosexual" implicitly refers to SEXUAL ORIENTATION - the orientation of a person towards persons of his or her same gender. The term "gay" stresses social and cultural matters over sex, and is preferred. It is far more acceptable to use the term "homosexual" adjectively, such as "a homosexual relationship" (though "gay" is also used adjectively.) You might loosely think of it as the difference between using "Asian" and "Oriental", though that's really a vague comparison at best. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.16.174.205 (talk) 02:4, 22 October 2006 (UTC).

I beg to differ. Homosexual actually means: "of the same sex." (homo=same, sexual= of, relating to, involving sex) I, and most other gays I know, do not care for this term at all. It's a clinical term that was made up in the 1950s ('40s?) 1880s due to the lack another, and was used to describe what was then thought to be deviant, aberrant behaviour of the mentally ill. Its emphasis is on the sex, and the sexuality of the 'subjects' it refers to, and does little to explain what's actually going on in the brain. --emerson7 17:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC) (corrected emerson7 21:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC))

 * The term "homosexual" goes back at least to the 1890s. — Walloon 17:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Kight's prediction has come true: this article currently devotes more space to discussing his sexuality than his work as an actor. — Walloon 18:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Words discussing his sexuality: 242, words discussing his work: 385. So, you're wrong...but not by much; you make a valid point. Weirdoactor 18:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not counting credits, just the narrative text in the "Career" section vs. the amount of text in the "Disclosing sexuality" section. We may just be a tad obsessed with sex. — Walloon 20:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Reverts
Gwernol: the information about Knight being one of the few openly gay actors on television is worthy of mention in the article. I do not appreciate your reversion of that information without discussion. Weirdoactor 15:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The edit of yours I removed was: "Knight's declaration makes him one of the few openly gay actors on television; not to mention that he plays a prominent role as a heterosexual character on a top-rated show." I have a couple of problems with this: "one of the few openly gay actors on television": few isn't well defined. In your opinion there are few, but compared with what? The overall number of actors on TV? The overall number of gay actors on TV? The percentage of openly gay people in society? The second issue is "not to mention that he plays a prominent role as a heterosexual character on a top-rated show." First this is clearly commentary ("not to mention"); more importantly what relevance does it have? Gay actors play straight characters and visa versa all the time; its hardly worth commenting on, is it? Gwernol 16:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I defy you to name five openly gay actors (other than Mr. Knight) who have had prominent roles playing heterosexuals on hit television shows on broadcast television. I can't. By your argument, we'd need to remove any reference to Jackie Robinson being the first black player in the MLB, or any reference to Valentina Tereshkova being the first woman in space. The phrase "not to mention" being proof of commentary is ludicrous. I used the word "few" because I know there are not that many, but I do not have an exact number; that's what the word "few" means. As for your other points; do you really not understand the relevance of an openly gay actor (especially the relevance insofar as an encyclopedia entry about said actor) playing a heterosexual character on national television, or are you being intentionally obtuse? This wouldn’t be relevant if his show were on cable. He is on the top-rated show on television. That’s called a “break-through”. It remains to be seen if his revelation will affect the ratings, but considering the demographic of the show, I tend to doubt there will be any appreciable drop. The information is relevant. If you can figure out a way to express it differently, to sound less like commentary (to your eyes, anyway), knock yourself out. Weirdoactor 16:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, you've changed the goalposts here: you didn't say "openly gay actors in a hit show on broadcast television", you said "openly gay actors on television". Looking at Category:Gay actors and Category:Lesbian actors I can easily name 5 who have appeared on television, let's try some obvious ones: Richard Chamberlain, Stephen Fry, Nigel Hawthorne, George Takei, Sara Gilbert, Amanda Bearse, Miriam Margolyes. Sorry the list is a little UK-centric, but I'm more familiar with British TV than American. All of these actors have played major (straight) roles in hit TV series. My point is that T.R. Knight is not the first gay man to play a straight role, that - as he says - his being gay is no big deal and that ultimately its more important that he's an actor than that he's gay. If he were truly the "breakthrough" first gay actor in US TV then it would be worth making a point of. He isn't though: its common enough that I don't think its worth mentioning. If you want to replace the edit however I won't remove it again. Gwernol 17:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't feel the need to specify broadcast over cable, but I see your point; if you wish to edit my phrasing thusly, have at it. You can easily name five openly gay actors who have appeared on television. Can you name five who were openly gay at the time, who played MAJOR (as in starring or co-starring, NOT guest/stunt/cameo starring) heterosexual roles? Richard Chamberlain wasn't out until 1989 (he admitted that he was gay in 2003), George Takei wasn't out until 2005. I'll give you Amanda Bearse, Sara Gilbert, Stephen Fry and Miriam Margolyes; and comment that it really isn't as big a deal in the UK as it is in the US. I hope that we can agree that it's almost unheard of on American broadcast television to have an openly gay man playing a heterosexual character on a hit (indeed, the #1) show, and add to that, in a heterosexual romantic relationship. Information in a biographical encyclopedia entry about such an actor should include such information, in a NPOV/non-commentary style. Can you clean up my phrasing so that it meets that standard? Or should it just be removed? Weirdoactor 18:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

FYI, I rephrased this statement in the article ever so slightly, hopefully clarifying it a bit - I mentioned he was one of the few gay actors in a contract role on a television program. This is probably the most correct way, in terms of industry lingo, of stating what you were trying to get at above - contract roles being "stars" of the show versus someone who is a recurring character (on Grey's Anatomy, for example, a recurring character would be Ellis Grey, or Olivia the nurse) or someone who makes a guest appearance (like most of the patients on GA). I hope this helps. NickBurns 16:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Absolutely perfect, in phrasing and tone. Thanks, Nick! Weirdoactor 17:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Luke MacFarlane
A few editors have added info about T.R. dating Luke MacFarlane, but without citing a reliable source for this information. If such information cannot be verified, it will be removed. This is an encyclopedia article, not a gossip/rumor page or the "Who's dating T.R. Knight?" message board. Heh. Thanks. -- Weirdoactor 15:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Will & Grace
i could swear ive seen em on an episode of will and grace where he played will's love interest but with who will broke up with since he was in the closet because of his line of work (sports journalist) i think this would be VERY notable since it has obvious comparisons to his real life as a closeted actor in a position in which many people do not come out since they feel it may effect their career. its also notable since he was pretending to be straight/closeted at the time and was playing a gay charicter, i think comparing and contrasting the situations would be beneficial to the reader. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.142.68.229 (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC).

The Grey's Anatomy actor of which you're thinking is Patrick Dempsey. He played Matt, a closeted sports journalist in the third season for a few episodes who dated Will. Correct current TV show, but wrong on the cast member.

Photo Image:The heart of darkness 066.jpg
Is that really a picture of TR? It really, really doesn't look like him. Sorry to waste discussion space if it is. 77.123.45.89 18:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Jocelyn

 * The picture on the article is not of the actor T.R. Knight who is the subject of the article. Even a basic Google search turns up pictures of the T.R. Knight about which this article is written.  The photo continually being added to the article is, again, not a photo of this article's subject.  Because this photo is not relevant to the subject of the article, it should and will be removed.  Before my edit or those of others who have made the same edit are reverted, please provide a legitimate reason for this image's inclusion in this article.  If a fair-use image of T.R. Knight, the actor and subject of this article, can be found, then by all means it can be added, but random images should not be used as placeholders. DarkandTwisty29 02:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

 * yes I was trying to wrok out idf that was the case the problem was no one was tlaking ad all the google pics are rather posed meaning that it is hard to tell.Geni 03:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

 * This most certainly is T.R. Knight. He has taken a break from filming and grown his hair out...which is naturally curly.  A lot of these Hollywood types look completely different without makeup on and especially when not in high profile areas such LA or NY.

i originally thought this pic could be knight if it were taken years ago...but if the claim is that it is recent....well, i question the voracity of the claim. i've placed recommendations for deletion on the image, and requested the submitter to pony-up with more details. --emerson7 | Talk 03:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

What else specifically do you want to know Pags182 03:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

 * I fully agree with recommending the image for deletion, especially in light of the dubious claims as to its authenticity. While his hair does have some natural wave, it is nowhere near that long or curly--to say nothing of the clear differences in face shape, length, width, and symmetry. Some of the first image results on a Google search are T.R. with longer/wavy hair, and there is no resemblance to the individual in the picture being debated.  In terms of specific details--you've claimed this is a recent picture from T.R.'s break--a date that the picture was taken would be a good start. DarkandTwisty29 04:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

 * If you would click on the photo you would know that it was taken January 10th. There is a strong chance that he was under the influence of marijuana as he seemed kind of out it, which would explain the expression on his face.  Pags182 04:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Expressions or not, there is not a strong enough physical resemblance to T.R. Knight's features. I do apologize, I overlooked the date on the photo, you had in fact provided that information.  However, the date of January 10 in and of itself is evidence enough that the individual in this photo is not T.R. Knight.  The entire cast of Grey's Anatomy, including T.R. Knight, was busy filming in January--T.R. was most definitely not on a filming break.  Additionally, T.R. was in attendance at the People's Choice Awards on January 9, and many reputable agencies (Getty, WireImage) photographed him at that event--with short hair.  It is impossible that the individual in your picture is T.R. Knight--at least not the one this article is about. DarkandTwisty29 04:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * well if you could revert back then?Geni 04:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Done! Glad we got this straightened out. DarkandTwisty29 04:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * How is this straightened out? You are ignoring a whole side of the debate. If you would note that piece of discussion that was recently deleted it would tell you that casts are routinely given a day or two off after an awards ceremony to celebrate a win (like the producers want them acting hung over after a night of raucous partying).  He remarked to his friend "even with the wig I get noticed," implying that this was not his real hair and that he wanted his privacy, something I regretfully already invaded.  I am a huge grey's fan and depriving me of my chance to put a picture up of one of my favorite actors is really despicable.  i know you have the best intentions, but please. Pags182 04:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm afaraid untill we have some fairly soild confermation that it is him we can't use it.Geni 04:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

added to all of the other compelling reasons that this is not knight are the missing blemishes. knight has a blemish on his left cheek, and right jaw. i call shenanigans. --emerson7 | Talk 04:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Good point about the blemishes on T.R. Knight's face--those are very specific identifying marks, and I hadn't even thought about those. Knight also has a much fuller face than the individual in the debated picture.  To the poster of the photo: I'm sorry if you feel your arguments are being disregarded.  However, there is substantial doubt that this individual is T.R. Knight.  I am aware that actors are often given the morning following awards banquets off, but they are not given ample time to fly to Jamaica, as the caption for your photo implies.  In addition, you first stated that this was a legitimate photo because T.R. was growing his hair out, and it was naturally very curly.  Now, after evidence of his short hair just one day before your photo was taken has surfaced, you're saying it was a wig.  It doesn't work both ways, and with the evidence against it, it doesn't work either way.  While I'm willing to believe that you believe your photo is T.R. Knight, there is much more evidence to support that it's not.  DarkandTwisty29 04:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Boy
not sure that link in his acting roles needs to be there. It links to boys (as the opposite of girls). And while the disambiguation page for boys does list several movies named "boys"; no plays are listed. unless it is the stage version of a movie, or a stub for that play is created, or there is a stub buried somewhere for the play that is not linked even to the disambiguation page, i'm not sure the link has much valueChildhoodtrauma 16:56, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Personal Life
"In June 2008, Knight revealed in an interview with tabloid television program Extra that for the past six months, he was dating Mark Cornelsen.[8] The two remain a couple." Quick note: I requested a citation for the comment in bold. Difficult to tell who and who is not still together without constant monitoring of both the subject and the WP page. Needs a source, or to be removed, if that fails. Bodypuzzle (talk) 05:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

 * I am removing it. Unless there is a split, there is no need to reference their current status.THD3 (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

T.R. Knight and Mark Cornelson are no longer together. This should be referenced in the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.248.57.238 (talk) 04:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

T. R. Knight → T.R. Knight – There should be no spaces between "T" and "R" as the name uses initials so there should be no spaces. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 16:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The standard is a space between initials in personal names. HandsomeFella (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Our house style is to space initials in personal names, unless there is an overwhelming WP:COMMONNAME argument. Jenks24 (talk) 00:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Naming conventions (people). Deor (talk) 23:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

 * Just to let everyone know, his name shows as "T.R. Knight" without a space on every website except WP including his own website. That's reason enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: it seems that a lot of feelings are involved here. I have noted that the first two letters in you user id are T and R. Are you in anyway related or a personal friend of Knight? If so, it would constitute a conflict of interest to get involved in this article. (And you dont have to shout!) HandsomeFella (talk) 07:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Lol, no. My username is has "TR" in it for other reasons. Also, I wasn't "shouting", I was just trying to make note that it was a comment.  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 22:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Messy
This article barely has a lead, and it has way too many sections, it also needs more references due to the length of the article. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 21:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on T. R. Knight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100614100408/http://www.tvguide.com/News/T.R.-Knight-Broadway-1019487.aspx to http://www.tvguide.com/News/T.R.-Knight-Broadway-1019487.aspx
 * Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9Ifi_-xXnzkJ:www.playbill.com/news/article/red-bull-readings-to-feature-t.r.-knight-jan-maxwell-lily-rabe-michael-urie-198191+&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20141216135344/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/red-bull-readings-to-feature-t.r.-knight-jan-maxwell-lily-rabe-michael-urie-198191 on http://www.playbill.com/news/article/red-bull-readings-to-feature-t.r.-knight-jan-maxwell-lily-rabe-michael-urie-198191

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on T. R. Knight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/67paZb1gB?url=http://www.people.com/people/article/0,26334,1548317,00.html to http://www.people.com/people/article/0,26334,1548317,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:T. R. Knight


text:
Verteporfin

Verteporfin (trade name Visudyne), a benzoporphyrin derivative, is a medication used as a photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy to eliminate the abnormal blood vessels in the eye associated with conditions such as the wet form of macular degeneration. Verteporfin accumulates in these abnormal blood vessels and, when stimulated by nonthermal red light with a wavelength of 689 nm in the presence of oxygen, produces highly reactive short-lived singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen radicals, resulting in local damage to the endothelium and blockage of the vessels.

Verteporfin is also used off-label for the treatment of central serous retinopathy.

Administration
Verteporfin is usually injected intravenously into the largest arm vein. It is injected at a dose of 6 mg/m2 and light-activated. It is usually given 15 minutes before laser treatment. This dose can be repeated 4 times per year.

Contraindications
Porphyria.

Side effects
Most common side effects are blurred vision, headache, and local effects at the injection site. Also, photosensitivity; it is strictly advised to avoid exposure to sunlight and unscreened lighting until 48 hours after verteporfin administration.

Dogs and rats have been treated with inactivated daily doses 32–70 times higher than the dose advised for humans. The 4 weeks of treatment resulted in mild extravascular hemolysis and hematopoiesis in the animals.

Light-activated cytotoxicity
Used by itself, the clinical recommended dose for verteporfin is not cytotoxic to human tissue. Though under light activation, in the presence of oxygen, it can form cytotoxic agents inside the tissue. The agents form when the porphyrin absorbs enough light to generate a reactive but short-lived singlet oxygen. The brief singlet oxygen can micro damage biological structures, leading to a local vascular occlusion.

Interactions
Verteporfin is known to interact with the herbal remedy feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium), the latter of which seems to act as an antagonist to verteporfin for unknown reasons. Taking the two substances simultaneously is inadvisable.

Verteporfin does not appear to be metabolized by Cytochrome P450 enzymes, therefore not affecting Cytochrome P450 metabolism of other drugs.

Shortages
In May 2020, a low manufacturing capacity caused disruption. This affected the usage of verteporfin among providers and patients in Europe. The EMA expected normal manufacturing to return by the first quarter 2022.

Off-label use in retinopathy
Verteporfin may be used off-label for treating a form of retinopathy.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Verteporfin


text:
Melody Beattie

Melody Beattie (born on July 2, 1948) is an American author of self-help books on codependent relationships.

Education and career
Born Melody Vaillancourt in Minneapolis, Beattie graduated from high school with honors. She began drinking at age 12, was an alcoholic by age 13, and a drug addict by 18.

Beattie published 18 books including Codependent No More, Beyond Codependency, The Language of Letting Go and Make Miracles in Forty Days: Turning What You Have into What You Want, published in 2010. Several of her books have been published in other languages.

Ideas
Beattie, along with Janet G. Woititz and Robin Norwood, were popularizers of science, helping to digest and explain the work of psychiatrist Timmen L. Cermak, author of Diagnosing and Treating Co-Dependence. Beattie popularized the concept of codependency in 1986 with Codependent No More, which sold eight million copies.

Codependent No More was first published by the Hazelden Foundation.

Beattie's early works also served as the first the Big Book for a 12-Step program called Co-Dependents Anonymous. Although "CoDA" now has a conference-approved (official) "the Big Book" of its own, Beattie's works continue to be central texts in some CoDA meetings.

title: Melody Beattie


text:
User talk:DarkMastero

Welcome!

 * Hi,, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and The FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page. Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Matani2005  Talk05:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Digimon categories
DarkMastero, the reason the Digimon are being sorted by level is because the main category was becoming too large. There is already a List_of_Digimon, we don't need the category to be another list CanadaGirl 07:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Digimon Systems Update
I'm trying to get some stuff done over at the digimon wikiproject, and have reorganized the project page. I also added a To-do list. In hoping we can collaborate. Circeus 17:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:DarkMastero


text:
Talk:Toyota 3S-GE engine

Merge with Toyota A engine
Wikipedia is a not a tuner knowledge base. The pertinent information here should be merged with the Toyota engines page and the rest deleted. --Tysto 06:00, 2005 August 21 (UTC)

Even if this is the case, I would not recommend merging it the Toyota A engine page. --Dan 00:45, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Most of the knowledge in this article is of no interest to a tuner. It is general vital knowledge about how the engine works, more suitable to mechanics than anything what you refer to as tuners. --Dublet 23:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

This is about an engine that is specifically for sports cars so I think it is of interest to tuners, and I think it shuold definitely have its own page. MISAEL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.143.77.120

If there is more information wanted on a certain topic should that information not be provided because they are "Tuners"? That's like saying there shouldn't be information on skis for the skiers. Wikipedia is a great site to look up just about anything. Keep it that way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Generation_Two on 22 September 2008

I think he meant it should be merged into Toyota S engine. The Toyota A engine is quite unrelated apart from being made by Toyota and also being in some of the same cars. Personally I prefer to keep related information together (which would agree with merging the articles) but the 3S-GE article is big enough to stand on its own and would clutter up the main S engine article. The main S article has an appropriate link to the 3S-GE article and the information here is similar to what is on most engine pages, so I'd just leave it as it is. Cheers. Stepho-wrs (talk) 05:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

 * For: If this variant is to have its own page then so should the others, or is there little to say about them. I think at the moment it would be better to keep everything together and leave this as a re-direct page. The main page would then more obviously flag the differences in engines which is probably of most interest to readers. Also, as nothing significant has been added in the article for over 12 months, is there much else to say. I think there is a good case for merging the articles and have added flags to try to open up the discussion. Malcolma (talk) 08:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Merge with Toyota S engine
It has been suggested that the 3S-GE and 3S-GTE articles be merged into the Toyota S engine article. No conclusion was reached in 2008. Comments? Please refrain from making major changes until some form of consensus has been reached.  Stepho  (talk) 04:06, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * For Definitely, this article is entirely extraneous. Bdc101 (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

For From the article:
 * The crankshaft, located within the crankcase, rotates on five aluminium alloy bearings and is balanced by eight weights.

As opposed to a crankshaft located in the trunk? And what else would the bearings of a 20th Century production engine be made of? It should be rewritten in a concise fashion, then merged with the S-motor article. If the 50-plus year old Chevrolet Small-Block engine, with over a dozen variants, can make do with one article, surely the Toyota S can do the same. HuntClubJoe (talk) 01:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm going ahead with a merge, it's been five years and five months without anyone making a single pertinent reason to keep this a separate article. Cheers,  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃   (talk) 17:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Thanks for picking up on our laziness. Much better now.  Stepho   (talk) 04:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Toyota 3S-GE engine


text:
User talk:Danny-w

Welcome!

 * Hi,, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and The FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page. Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Matani2005  Talk05:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

SS St. Louis
I moved your question to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships and answered it there. Gdr 12:42, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Karlsruhe
Hi, you added informations about the jewish community in Karlsruhe to the article. Do you remember the source, I would like to take the information into the city-wiki of Karlsruhe. Nowadays we have a new synagogue, a picture can be found in the city-wiki of Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe:Bild:Synagoge Luft.jpg. --Kawana 17:32, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Hi and thank you. I translated (briefly) from the Hebrew Wikipedia. Most of the article over there speaks about the  extincted jewish communuty in Karlsruhe

I don't see the source in the wiki text. However, a search in google - brought me to these links:

A. An article about the Jewish community in the city. (in german).

B. The article "Juden in Karlsruhe" (in german), over here :

C. The german film "Alle Juden raus!" - here:

D. The personal story of Hanne, here:

and so forth.

See also in google - with the words "jews" (or "juden")+ "Karlsruhe"

Danny-w 19:54, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --Kawana 20:31, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Favela Ben Ateva.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Favela Ben Ateva.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 14:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

 * See an explanation here . Danny-w 19:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Still need to state the actual license - GFDL, CC, whatever. My Hebrew is rusty :-) so I can't tell what the he: page says for license. It's important to replicate the license info here, sometimes the original image disappears and then there's nothing to refer to. Stan 03:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 11:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:The body artist dellilo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The body artist dellilo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 09:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

 * As you can see this image is a BOOK COVER. Danny-w 12:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Sugihara_stamp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sugihara_stamp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I thought stamps are permitted for use - for educational non commercional purpose.

 * Details are here:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Faroe_stamps

 * If you think it's illegal or wrong purpose - you might erase it.
 * Danny-w

License tagging for Image:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

 * The tag "bookCover" was put. Danny-w 19:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Peselamenora.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Peselamenora.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 16:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Favela Ben Ateva.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Favela Ben Ateva.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 16:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Duch sheperd.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Duch sheperd.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 16:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

 * The picture was taken from the same article in the hebrew wikipdia . It is written in hebrew (as I wrote over there) that it was taken with permision from the israeli site "MyPet" . The permision was given to a fair use. Danny-w 12:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Deathofamonk hilu.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Deathofamonk hilu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

 * The image is a BOOK-COVER image, in an article discussing the specific Book. I didn't understand what exactly the problem is. Danny-w 22:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * As written at the top of the page, a generic template tag is NOT a valid fair use rationale. Please see Fair use rationale guideline -- lucasbfr talk 08:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

 * The tag was fixed. Danny-w 22:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

 * I'm tired of it!! If you (the bot and its operator) think the use in the The Stranger's book-cover image does not suitable to the definition of "fair use", in the article The Stranger itself, then do whatever you want and delete it. Danny-w 19:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The tag was fixed. Danny-w 07:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tarzan and His Mate 2.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tarzan and His Mate 2.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 04:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

 * This time I'm really tired of it. The explanation is in the text itself. Please delete the image. I won't upload anymore pictures to the English wikipedia. Danny-w 18:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lost Language of Cranes BookCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lost Language of Cranes BookCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

 * I corrected it and added the right explanation. Thanks. Danny-w (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The body artist dellilo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The body artist dellilo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

 * The description was clarified. Thank you. Danny-w (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jamison - anquite mind.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamison - anquite mind.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

 * The description was clarified. Danny-w (talk) 12:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Beaufort (novel) in the original
Greetings, Danny! In your edit to this newly created page, I see you deleted the transliteration of the original title in Hebrew. I believe this information might prove helpful, along with the subsequent reference to the Hebrew novel (with its original title) as the winner of the Israeli literary prizes (Sapir, Yitzhak Sadeh). Remember, "Beaufort" as a title was unknown at those junctures. Therefore I would like to restore it, or would you kindly explain to me whether it's proscribed in the Manual of Style or elsewhere. If you translate from Hebrew, perhaps you'd be willing to expand the page from that source? (see the Talk page as to why I won't :-) Also, please remember to italicize titles in running text, and to boldface only in the first line. -- Thanks, Deborahjay (talk) 23:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Update: I found a way to neatly include the transliterated Hebrew title by formatting a Bibliography section and cleaning up the content (that still needs confirmation from the Library of Congress once its online catalog is accessible again). הערך עדיין בחיתוליו — I appreciate your pitching in at this formative stage! -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 00:21, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

 * I didn't delete the hebrew translation, but the script in latin letter "IM - YESH - GAN - EDEN". This information is not relevant to the english speakers who read the article and I afraid it wasn't encyclopedic. I also deleted the translation of the word 'HEAVEN' as 'garden of eden' becouse of the lack of relevance to the english name 'Beaufort'. Danny-w (talk) 11:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Plot of Beaufort (novel)
I've deleted the Plot summary you added to the Beaufort (novel) page. It would be acceptable if edited into encyclopedic language, but certainly not to cut&paste verbatim from a review that's already provided as an external link. The page does need expanding (and I've placed a Template for that). -- Deborahjay (talk) 23:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

 * O.K. Danny-w (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Ezra Nawi
Hi, I noticed (via Google translate!) that you commented on the Ezra Nawi page that he was convicted of sex with a minor in 1992, and you stated the youth was 17 years old. It is currently being widely reported in Ireland that he was 15, though there are no sources that I can see to support this. If you could provide me with any links in Hebrew that state the age of the Palestinian youth, or can shed any light on this I would be very grateful. Thanks in advance! Cripipper (talk) 00:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Hi. I heard it when I talked with friends during a discussion. I don't have written sources. Therefore I didn't write it in the article itself. I'll try to ask this friend about written sources. :-) Danny. Danny-w (talk) 21:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ISCAR Metalworking

A tag has been placed on ISCAR Metalworking, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. XXX8906 (talk) 12:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Jamison - anquite mind.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jamison - anquite mind.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I do not visit in the english wikipedia very often. Did not see the note. The eddirors here could change the title to "fair use" like the other places of books covers. I did it in the hebrew wikipedia where I wright more often. Danny-w (talk) 09:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Duch businesspeople

A tag has been placed on Category:Duch businesspeople requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T 16:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Military collector
Hello Danny! I am a Swedish militaria collector, and I have been looking for a blank document for the Operation Protective edge ribbon for ages. It will be a display piece, and because of the award being so recent, I dont want any names to be visible on the certificate. I saw that you uploaded a picture of such a document a while back, and I was wondering if I could buy it from you? You decide the price! Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwedishRanger (talk • contribs) 20:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

 * Hello. What picture are you talking about? May I have a link? Danny-w (talk) 12:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gilad Kahana

The article Gilad Kahana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Never really been referenced since it was created. Two reference present, 1 is an persons own site, the other is his older site. No coverage. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. No social media, nothing of significant on streaming sites. Less than 1600 subscribers on Youtube."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  scope_creep Talk  10:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of World Social Work Day

A tag has been placed on World Social Work Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ifsw.org/history-world-social-work-day. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t · c)  buidhe  15:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Your edit to World Social Work Day  has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. (t · c)  buidhe  16:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 * Hi. I deleted from the article everything that could be suspected of being copied. The text that remains there is original. (Part of it is even taken from the articke "Social Work" in Wikipedia.  Currently there is no coppied text there. Danny-w (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you copy text from other wikipedia articles, you must attribute per WP:CWW because Wikipedia's licensing requires attribution.
 * I'm glad that the infringing text from an external website was deleted, and it's essential not to do that in the future because copyright is taken very seriously on this site for legal reasons. (t · c)  buidhe  16:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of World Social Work Day

The page World Social Work Day has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.monmouth.edu/school-of-social-work/ifsw/ and https://www.thereisadayforthat.com/holidays/various/world-social-work-day. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review  firefly  ( t · c ) 16:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The text you deleted was original and not coppied. but as you wish. Danny-w (talk) 16:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Danny-w


text:
User talk:Rogerqcaz

Welcome!

 * Hi,, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and The FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page. Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Matani2005  Talk05:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rogerqcaz


text:
User talk:Srborlongan

Welcome!

 * Hi,, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Help and The FAQ, plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page. Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Matani2005  Talk05:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Srborlongan


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter ramsaroop

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:03, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Peter ramsaroop

 * Delete. Advertising/vanity. —Charles O'Rourke 06:02, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll change my vote to keep as well, based on below. —Charles O'Rourke 17:05, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete nn vanity Dottore So 06:12, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll change my vote to keep based on below.Dottore So 15:51, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete. Advertising. --Apyule 06:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep He does seem to be an active political figure in Guyana, but the article needs a lot of work. --Apyule 07:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep Peter Ramsaroop is serving as a civil society activist for change in Guyana, a country of high potential that has not been realised due to political instability and racial tension. There's no profit to gain.
 * Keep The article does need work though to put him into a context in Guyana. Dlyons493 09:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, with proper context. --Agamemnon2 10:47, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Notable Guyanese (+1000 Google hits for "Peter Ramsaroop", and nearly that many for "Peter R. Ramsaroop"). Keep (plus cleanup, and then move to Peter Ramsaroop). DS 12:52, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. --Lomedae 13:33, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Capitalistroadster 16:14, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per DS. Guettarda 16:44, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but may be a copyvio. Secretlondon 19:38, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * copyvio. Tagged and bagged. JDoorjam 22:48, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Updated. Updated page to avoid the apparent copyright violation of Peter's short bio from his RoopGroup website. Permission was given to use this material.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text: Template:Rugby League in New Zealand

title: Template:Rugby League in New Zealand


text:
Talk:Rick Allen (drummer)

Full name/Birth name?
Is the full name shown (Richard John Cyril “Rick” Allen) known to be correct?

The ASCAP publishing database lists “Richard Alisdair Allen” as co-writer of multiple Def Leppard songs. Mrpaulin (talk) 03:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Jenkem?
In looking at the jenkem article I am not finding any references to its use before the 1990s. Additionally, the claim in the article that Allen was under the influence of this substance is unsubstantiated. Danaseilhan (talk) 07:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

At one point in the article, it says:

and when Joe Elliott got a call saying that Rick lost his arm in a car crash, he was stunned to know so he drove...

"[S]tunned to know"? Not good use of English. Tessaroithmost (talk) 19:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Merge of Duplicate Article
At Rick Allen (Def Leppard drummer) the following text
 * Rick Allen was the drummer in the British rock band Def Leppard. He lost an arm in an accident but still plays for the band with one arm

is the result of the following edits I am merging the histories but leaving it to those more familiar to do whatever is called for with the text preserved here (and in the Page history). --Jerzy•t 06:02 & 06:22, 2005 August 21 (UTC)
 * (cur) (last) 19:25, 2005 July 24 68.105.105.179
 * (cur) (last) 23:53, 2005 February 18 Rich Farmbrough m
 * (cur) (last) 18:17, 2004 October 29 Mike Hackney

Huh?
The article says, "Doctors had reattached his left arm, but due to infection it was removed again. Rick Allen left the hospital three and a half weeks after he was taken in, even though the situation he was in was expected to last for six months." That doesn't make sense. Does this mean that, after six months, was Rick expected to have grown a new arm? Because that's what it says. --Trweiss (talk) 19:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

 * What the fuck are you talking about? 76.219.170.8 (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

He was expected by the doctors to require up to six months in the hospital due to the several complications encountered with reattaching and then removing the arm again. Unexpectedly, he was able to be released a short 3 and a half weeks later. Yea, the sentence could probably use a bit of rephrasing, but that's what they mean.

Also, if memory serves, the doctors had no intention on re-attaching the arm based on the fact that it took so long for Rick to be discovered after the accident. He was able to convince the doctors to give it a try. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.202.148.232 (talk) 20:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Drug Addiction, Alcoholism and Spousal Abuse
The article is now better written but it’s a bit of a whitewash, more like the biography you’d find in a record label press kit. There’s no mention of his drug or alcohol addictions or history of domestic violence – both of which are a matter of legal record. It’s referred to in another Wikipedia article and a quick Google search turned up the following links: and. I’d expand the article myself but it should really be done by someone who has a deeper knowledge of the subject; I just happened to recall reading about his arrest when it happened in the mid-90s. Martan (talk) 13:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Oh do it!! Victuallers (talk) 20:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed "allegedly" from discussion of spousal abuse as cited reference indicates he pleaded guilty.
 * CraigMatthews (talk) 03:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

childhood
sheesh, do we really need to know that this guy played drums on pots and pans as a kid?? him and every other non-famous person on earth. MrGears (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

rick allen
rick allen became one of the best drummers alive to acomplish his goal he set out his live of being a drummer but then came the day of the accident rick had lost his left arm in aa car accident —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.239.160.85 (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

this (^^^^) is fantastic. this is what wikipedia should be like. bravo! more!

ffs.

duncanrmi (talk) 23:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Recommend expansion and improvement
Today I added this: Cleanup-biography

This article is not a useful biography of Rick Allen, especially because so much more info is available in the public record. In fact, there is very little actual biography at all after the Intro section. I recommend significant improvements to this article and will help out myself when I have the time. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 08:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

 * It's getting better... thanks to some anonymous folks who restored some biographical info that had been deleted/vandalized previously. We need some more expansion on Rick Allen's personal like but will have to be careful with drug abuse and spousal abuse stories, as Victuallers noted a few comments above. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 10:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Depressed?
The article says "he never felt deeply depressed because of what happened" but goes on to say "Allen thought that he could not continue drumming for Def Leppard and became very depressed." Which is true? Totnesmartin (talk) 16:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Date of Accident
Rick's accident was in 1984, not 1981.Hucklebuck10 (talk) 03:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

First Wife?
The article notes specifically his marriage to his "first wife" but does not give any information about a subsequent marriage? In which case that should be "his wife" with no qualifier, or otherwise at least a mention of any other marriage(s). 85.229.56.227 (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Origin?
The infobox has a "Origin London, England" section, but there is no mention of London in the article. 194.28.127.53 (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Dead ecternal links
Many dead external links on this page. 172.126.252.7 (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Rick Allen (drummer)


text:
Talk:Cherry Creek (Colorado)

Comments
Added an extremely cursory overview of ecology, flora and fauna; hope to add more on this soon. Also hope to add a section of the geology of the creek. -- 66.249.64.35

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Cherry Creek (Colorado). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http%3A%2F%2Fviewer.nationalmap.gov%2Fviewer%2F to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110103172756/http://parks.state.co.us/Parks/CherryCreek/Nature/Pages/Nature.aspx to http://parks.state.co.us/Parks/CherryCreek/Nature/Pages/Nature.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070325051621/http://www.fishexplorer.com:80/fx/lakedet.asp?lid=2109 to http://www.fishexplorer.com/fx/lakedet.asp?lid=2109

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:07, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Cherry Creek (Colorado). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317183609/http://www.denvermall.net/cherry-creek.html to http://www.denvermall.net/cherry-creek.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120413122455/http://www.parks.state.co.us/Parks/CherryCreek/Nature/Fish/Pages/Fish.aspx to http://parks.state.co.us/Parks/CherryCreek/Nature/Fish/Pages/Fish.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120422141743/http://www.parks.state.co.us/Parks/CherryCreek/Nature/Wildlife/Pages/Wildlife.aspx to http://parks.state.co.us/Parks/CherryCreek/Nature/Wildlife/Pages/Wildlife.aspx
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fishexplorer.com/fx/lakedet.asp?lid=2109

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cherry Creek (Colorado)


text: File:Catalpa (Jolie Holland album - cover art).jpg