text:
File:Air Baron cover.jpg

Box art for Air Baron game published by Avalon Hill

Fair use rationale
This image has been checked by a third party against the articles in which it appears. It meets the following fair-use criteria:-
 * No free alternative possible
 * If this is a promotional image from the company, then any "user-supplied" image whose sole purpose was clearly to represent the same copyrighted box/item art (and nothing else, and with no significant artistic input- i.e. a "mechanical" reproduction, whether by scanner or camera) would likely have the same restrictions.
 * Is being used to demonstrate the product and/or its marketing
 * Serves to demonstrate the product being discussed rather than being used in a solely decorative manner.
 * Does not deprive company of ability to make money in any way
 * Is not being used in misleading or misrepresentative manner

title: File:Air Baron cover.jpg


text:
Queen Charlotte Strait

Queen Charlotte Strait is a strait between Vancouver Island and the mainland of British Columbia, Canada. It connects Queen Charlotte Sound with Johnstone Strait and Discovery Passage and via them to the Strait of Georgia and Puget Sound. It forms part of the Inside Passage from Washington to Alaska. The term Queen Charlotte Strait is also used to refer to the general region and its many communities, notably of the Kwakwakaʼwakw peoples. Despite its name, Queen Charlotte Strait does not lie between Haida Gwaii (Queen Charlotte Islands) and the mainland; that body of water is named Hecate Strait.

Etymology
Queen Charlotte Sound was named by James Strange on August 5, 1786, in honour of Queen Charlotte, the consort of King George III. Strange was the leader of a fur trading expedition of two vessels, the Captain Cook, under Captain Henry Lawrie, and the Experiment, under Captain John Guise. During a boat excursion up Goletas Channel, Strange saw an opening ahead and named it Queen Charlotte Sound. The body of water he named was what is today known as Queen Charlotte Strait.

For some time Queen Charlotte Strait was also called Queen Charlotte Sound, until 1920 when the BCGNIS and Hydrographic Service distinguished between Queen Charlotte Sound and Queen Charlotte Strait. George Vancouver, who used the name in his maps and writings, wrote that the sound was named by Mr. S. Wedgeborough, in command of the Experiment under James Strange, but this is probably a mistake.

Geography
According to the BC Geographical Names, the northern boundary of Queen Charlotte Strait is defined as a line running Cape Sutil, at the north end of Vancouver Island, to Cape Caution on the mainland. The southern end of Queen Charlotte Strait is described as "several narrow channels north and east of Malcolm Island".

The strait lies between the mainland and Vancouver Island portions of the Regional District of Mount Waddington, a form of regional municipal governance with power over zoning, building and sewer permits and inter-municipal integration. Most communities in the region, however, are Indian reserve communities of the Kwakwakaʼwakw peoples which are outside the jurisdiction of regional district governance. The traditional territories of most of the various Kwakwaka'wakw peoples overlap in the strait, which is a vital fishery resource and transportation link between their communities.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Queen Charlotte Strait


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most developed country in central america

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Tony Sidaway Talk 16:27, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Most developed country in central america
Non-encyclopedic GinaDana 01:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Non-verifiable, and if it can be, the article needs a whole rewrite. I doubt it can be salvaged from this condition. --Tito xd 01:27, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; Unsubstantiated, non-verifiable | Celcius 04:44, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, wholly unsubstantiated and unverifiable. - Mgm|(talk) 09:13, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. as per nom Alf 12:34, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV Roodog2k 13:29, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; as per above IINAG 13:54, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. -- DS1953 15:09, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete along with best country city. Optichan 20:06, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete until we can all agree what "development" is. --tranquileye 20:26:23, 2005-08-26 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV. *drew 22:02, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV starts already with the name of the article. -Mariano 07:53, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Interfaith Alliance

Interfaith Alliance is a national interfaith organization in the United States founded in 1994 to counteract the religious right. Its stated goal is to protect faith and freedom by respecting individual rights, preserving the boundaries between religion and government, and uniting diverse voices to protect democracy and to challenge extremism and build common ground.

Leadership
In July 2022, Rev. Paul Raushenbush, was named president and CEO of Interfaith Alliance. He succeeded Rabbi Jack Moline, who had held the post since 2015, and Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy, who serve as President Emiriti of the organization.

Partner organizations
Interfaith Alliance and its partner organization, Interfaith Alliance Foundation, work out of their main office in Washington, D.C. The group has local affiliates around the United States.

Views
Interfaith Alliance recognizes the powerful role that religion plays in America, and it values the positive impact that religious belief can have on American politics. However, Interfaith Alliance's concern is that religion and the United States government are becoming dangerously entangled. Interfaith Alliance believes that religion is being manipulated as a tool to influence policy and advance political strategy. Interfaith Alliance works to ensure the sanctity of religion and the integrity of politics. The group also supports an end to discrimination based on sexual orientation.

In 2019, Interfaith Alliance joined with 42 other religious and allied organizations in issuing a statement opposing Project Blitz, an effort by a coalition of Christian right organizations to influence state legislation.

title: Interfaith Alliance


text:
Richmond River cod

The Richmond River cod was a form of Maccullochella cod, now believed to have been eastern freshwater cod, Maccullochella ikei, that occurred naturally in the Richmond River system, an east coast river system in north-east New South Wales, Australia.

Eastern freshwater cod in turn are a species of Maccullochella cod found in east coast drainages and originating from Murray cod, Maccullochella peelii, that crossed the Great Dividing Range and entered east coast drainages from a river capture event between 0.62 and 1.62 million years ago (mean estimate 1.1 million years ago).

Richmond River cod are extinct, from overfishing, habitat destruction including gross siltation, and whole-of-catchment scale bushfires and fish kills in the 1930s.

The Richmond River system has now been restocked with small numbers of eastern freshwater cod from the Clarence River system, but these appear to have been insufficient to re-establish populations; there is no evidence of these stocked fish reproducing.

title: Richmond River cod


text: User talk:205.152.8.132

title: User talk:205.152.8.132


text:
Delta Force: Black Hawk Down

Delta Force: Black Hawk Down is a first-person shooter video game developed by NovaLogic. It was released for Microsoft Windows on March 25, 2003; for Mac OS X in July 2004; and for PlayStation 2 and Xbox on July 26, 2005. It is the 6th game of the Delta Force series. It is set in the early 1990s, during the Unified Task Force peacekeeping operation in Somalia. The missions take place primarily in the southern Jubba Valley and the capital Mogadishu. The game also features a mission editor with which players can make custom missions. The game is based on the book of the same name, not the Sony film.

Plot
The player begins the game as a soldier with Task Force Ranger, commanding three team members: Huck, Mother, and Preacher. They take part in the Unified Task Force peacekeeping operation during the Somali Civil War. Following the third mission, the player assumes the role of the same soldier. They are assigned to 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta, taking part in Operation Gothic Serpent, a military operation conducted during the Battle of Mogadishu on October 3, 1993. During the latter section of the game, the player will still play as that soldier, but is now sent to the 3rd Ranger Battalion and the 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta, commonly known as Delta Force. The final mission features an alternate history, in which the player and a team of operators carry out the assassination of Mohamed Farrah Aidid.

Gameplay
The gameplay in Delta Force: Black Hawk Down differs heavily from earlier installments in the series. While all earlier Delta Force games focus on long distance outdoor combat and have open ended mission design, Black Hawk Down focuses on close quarters combat in urban environments with heavily scripted missions more similar to the then-recent Medal of Honor: Allied Assault. Many of the series' trademark features, such as bullet ballistics and later weapon sway, were abandoned in favour of simpler action-focused gameplay. The player is usually accompanied by a squad of three AI-controlled soldiers, whom the player is able to give simple commands such as the order to hold fire, hold position or throw a grenade. Like in earlier Delta Force games, the campaign in Black Hawk Down is divided into distinct missions. While the campaign is linear, most of the time three missions are available at the same time, allowing the player to complete them in any order. Completing a mission saves the campaign progress and usually unlocks a new one. Already completed missions can be accessed from an "instant action" list.

Multiplayer
In addition to the singleplayer campaign, Delta Force: Black Hawk Down features LAN and online multiplayer with support for up to 50 players in a single match, breaking the record for the largest console multiplayer battles at the time.

The online multiplayer is powered by NovaWorld, which tracks players' statistics, gives them increasing ranks, and has a matchmaking system. Various gameplay modes are available, including Deathmatch, Team Deathmatch, and King of the Hill, as well as objective-based ones. Like in the previous two Delta Force games, players can choose one out of several character classes with individual characteristics.

Development
Delta Force: Black Hawk Down uses an engine based on Comanche 4, which allows for more detail and advanced visual effects, thanks to shader support. Also, vehicle movement is not restricted to specific, predefined paths anymore, and the AI drivers are able to avoid obstacles. It is the first engine used by the series to support platforms other than PC.

Expansion pack
In 2004, an expansion pack, Team Sabre, was released for the PC and PlayStation 2 versions of the game, adding two campaigns which take place in Colombia and Iran, respectively.

Reception
Black Hawk Down's computer version received a "Silver" sales award from the Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association (ELSPA), indicating sales of at least 100,000 copies in the United Kingdom.

The PC version received "generally favorable reviews", while the Xbox and PlayStation 2 versions received "mixed" reviews according to video game review aggregator Metacritic.

Maxim gave the game a score of eight out of ten, first saying of the PC version, "While it would be impossible for the game to mimic the raw emotion and chaos that defined this mission-turned-disaster in real life, the graphics are the best we’ve seen on a battlefield"; and then of the PS2 and Xbox versions, "Drink in your fill of military realism in crowded, confusing war zones where you can drown in rivers, kill civilians, and partake in friendly fire–just like we did–before heading to boot camp to apologize. If that's not enough carnage, you can also engage in 32-player (50 on Xbox Live) online deathmatch missions, which is technically twice the bloody chaos of Halo 2. See, foreign policy can be fun!"

The Cincinnati Enquirer gave the PC version a score of three-and-a-half stars out of five and stated, "If you can forgive the game's lighter approach–one that emphasizes action instead of strategy–then you'll enjoy Black Hawk Down."

However, Detroit Free Press gave the Xbox version two stars out of four, quipping, "Diehard military combat fans might want to rent this one just to partake in the giant chaotic skirmishes."

The Sydney Morning Herald gave both the PS2 and Xbox versions two-and-a-half stars out of five, stating, "The solo campaign lacks the pizzazz of other military shooters, but decent multiplayer options prevent it from feeling pilotless."

title: Delta Force: Black Hawk Down


text:
User talk:209.129.155.253

December 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Terror Jr because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Terror Jr— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Terror Jr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

title: User talk:209.129.155.253


text: User talk:71.107.97.207

title: User talk:71.107.97.207


text:
Lori Lansens

Lori Lansens is a Canadian novelist and screenwriter.

Profile
Lansens, a successful screenwriter, has credits including the films South of Wawa, Wolf Girl and Marine Life, prior to publishing her first novel Rush Home Road in 2002. It was a shortlisted finalist for the Rogers Writers' Trust Fiction Prize.

Lansens' follow-up novel, The Girls, was published in 2005. The Girls received recognition as a 2007 Best Book for Young Adults from the American Library Association. and was longlisted for the Orange Prize in 2007.

She followed up with The Wife's Tale in 2009, and The Mountain Story in 2015. In fall 2019 Lansens published This Little Light, concerning the bombing of a Calabasas Christian school, after which a rebellious young girl is accused of the crime. The novel deals with themes of sex and religion, both common themes for this author.

Originally from Chatham, Ontario, Lansens currently resides in Los Angeles with her husband, television director and producer Milan Cheylov, along with their children.

title: Lori Lansens


text:
File:Squeeze hits of the year cover.jpg

Licensing
The cover for Squeeze's 1985 single Hits Of The Year. From the website http://www.squeezenet.co.uk/.

title: File:Squeeze hits of the year cover.jpg


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Band manager

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. (after being BJAODN'd) Paul August ☎ 20:27, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

Band manager
A wholly inappropriate tone for a Wiki article - a thorough cleanup would mean a rewrite so why not delete & start again? Eddie.willers 01:03, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * BJAODN Ryan Norton T 01:13, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJOADN. Gazpacho 01:35, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJOADN. Jaxl | talk 01:45, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODNed. Rewrite or delete, same thing. That's the funniest article in a while. N (t/c) 02:25, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Based on all the comments on here, I've added to More Best of BJAODN as well. This is a really bloody funny article. N (t/c) 02:42, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep! Ah, no, BJAODN. But damn, I wish we could keep this for real. JRM · Talk 02:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Bishonen | talk 03:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. It would be a bit like Dr Johnson's definition of a patron. Capitalistroadster 03:56, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Archive and BJAODN this version but keep article and rewrite. Encyclopedic topic, can use as a central clearinghouse for articles on Col. Tom Parker etc. -EDM 04:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN; POV, humour | Celcius 04:48, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and BJAODN. In this case a redlink is likelier to inspire someone to write a valid article. (If it's blue they may think we've got a full article on the subject). Nothing worth keeping anyway. - Mgm|(talk) 09:17, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Two side-splitters already today. Alf 12:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * >Bad Jokes; I do not think that one has to pour one's heart out to see why. IINAG 13:53, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

 * BJAODN and delete. I just can't believe there's no reference to the Arrogant Worms' song (Road Manager). sing along- "He's a big, fat roooaaad manager, big fat roooaaaad manager. . ."--Scimitar parley 15:33, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN and delete as per Eddie.willers. --Blackcap | talk 18:40, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Delete after. Optichan 20:08, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. --Carnildo 21:44, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite, but add to BJAODN. Rob Church Talk 02:45, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * See Eddie.willers' comment, top. --Blackcap | talk 16:32, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep completely true. SchmuckyTheCat 06:29, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry... Is it your opinion that an article of this tone is "completely true" and should be kept in an encyclopedia? Whether or not your experiences have been like this, it's so POV it beggars belief. And to the argument that VfD is not cleanup, see Eddie.willers' comment at the top of the page. --Blackcap | talk 16:32, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN and delete. *drew 22:05, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User:MaxSpiderX

Under construction...

title: User:MaxSpiderX


text:
Brisbane River cod

The Brisbane River cod was a unique form of Maccullochella cod that occurred naturally in the Brisbane River system, an east coast river system in south east Queensland, Australia. The Brisbane River Cod was known as the Bumgur (meaning blue cod) by the Jinibara people centred in the Kilcoy region and the junction of the Stanley and Brisbane Rivers. Their exact taxonomic status is not known, but based on several genetic studies it is suspected that Brisbane River Cod were a species intermediate between eastern freshwater cod (Maccullochella ikei) of the Clarence River and Richmond River systems in northern New South Wales and Mary River cod of the Mary River in southern Queensland.

All naturally occurring Maccullochella cod in east coast drainages ultimately originate from Murray cod, Maccullochella peelii that entered an east coast river system, likely the Clarence, via a natural river capture event somewhere between 0.62 and 1.62 million years ago (mean estimate 1.1 million years ago), as estimated by DNA divergence rates.

Brisbane River cod are extinct, from overfishing, habitat destruction and siltation, and whole-of-catchment scale bushfires and ash fish kills in the 1930s.

The Brisbane River has now been restocked with Mary River cod from the Mary River system.

title: Brisbane River cod


text:
Albert Dubout

Albert Dubout (15 May 1905 – 27 June 1976) was a French cartoonist, illustrator, painter, and sculptor.

Biography
Albert Dubout was born in Marseille. After attending school at Nîmes (where he met Jean Paulhan) he studied at the fine arts school in Montpellier where he met his first wife, Renée Altier, and where his first drawings were published in the student journal L'écho des étudiants in 1923.

After moving to Paris, literary director Philippe Soupault was the first to hire him to illustrate a book, Les Embarras de Paris by Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux. Dubout continued on to illustrate numerous editions of books by Boileau, Beaumarchais, Mérimée, Rabelais, Villon, Cervantes, Balzac, Racine, Voltaire, Rostand, Poe, and Courteline.

He collaborated on numerous magazines and journals such as Le Rire, Marianne, Eclats de Rire, L'os à Moëlle, Paris-Soir, and Ici-Paris.

He also created movie and theatre posters as well as theatrical sets. He worked in advertising, painted oil canvases (over 70 in total) and illustrated many book covers and record sleeves.

Albert Dubout also illustrated Gargantua and Pantagruel, oeuvres of the famous French satirist Rabelais. One of his favorite and perhaps unwilling models were an obese tobacconist and the small and scrawny tax collector who lived in the forties and fifties in Agde, Herault, France.

In 1953, French president Vincent Auriol awarded him the Legion of Honour. His name also appeared that year in the Petit Larousse dictionary.

In 1965, he illustrated the San-Antonio book series, at the request of author Frédéric Dard.

In 1967 he married his second wife, Suzanne Ballivet, who was also a painter. He divided his time in this period between Mézy-sur-Seine, near Paris, and Palavas-les-Flots, on the south coast, until his death in 1976.

In 1992, a museum about Dubout was dedicated in Palavas-les-Flots.

Anecdotes

 * In his caricatures, Dubout frequently mocked the "little train of Palavas", which ran from nearby Montpellier, and the tourists who visited his little seaside town from there.

title: Albert Dubout


text:
Eleanor Rigby (novel)

Eleanor Rigby is a 2004 novel by Douglas Coupland, about a lonely woman at ages 36 and 42. The novel is written as a first-person narrative by the main character, Liz Dunn. Its title is derived from the 1966 song of the same name by the Beatles.

The novel centres on changes to Liz's life when someone from her past unexpectedly re-enters her life. It is written in a light, often comic, tone, but resonates on many deeper issues, including loneliness, family, religious visions and multiple sclerosis.

Plot
Two distinct plot movements are separated by a break in the narrative flow. The first part of the novel involves two retellings: the story of Liz Dunn’s trip to Europe and her pregnancy, and the story of the re-emergence into her life of her child, Jeremy, who is dying of multiple sclerosis.

As a teenager, Liz goes on a trip to Europe, her one big expressive moment. On this trip, while drunk, she loses her virginity in Italy to a man she cannot remember. From this experience, she becomes pregnant with Jeremy, who is put up for adoption, and goes in and out of foster families for much of his young life.

Jeremy arrives back into Liz’s life when she is at a low point of loneliness. His illness is terminal, and because of drug abuse, he has only a short time to live. Jeremy’s introduction into Liz’s life rattles the lonely world she has constructed, opening up her and her world.

The first part of the novel, narrated by Liz, jumps between these two moments, constantly reminding the reader that these are moments in the past. There is a symbolic page break between the first section, which takes place in the past, and the second section, which takes place in the novel’s present.

In the present, Jeremy has died. Liz finds a meteorite that she takes to be a very precious object. She sleeps with it under her pillow to keep it close. She eventually, through a list of circumstances, decides to travel to Europe to find Jeremy’s father, a trip which again leads her to a world of excitement, police and army incidents, and a reunion with Jeremy’s father.

Liz Dunn
Liz Dunn is the protagonist of this novel. She is an overweight, lonely woman, who lives a removed solitary existence. Her apartment, for instance, can only accommodate one person.

Coupland has spoken extensively about the character of Liz Dunn, claiming that she was his most realistic character.

""…She’s actually one of the first characters I’ve created who I can talk about like she’s real, she comes from an upbringing in a generally democratic society where no one tells you about the currency of lust or the currency of bodies or of family name. Warhol used to say that people get scored out of 40 based on looks, body, money and fame, that you could be rich and good-looking but if you’re not famous or don’t have a good body, you won’t make it. It’s a surprisingly shallow yet surprisingly effective measure to learn ... and Liz, well she’s just slipped through all the cracks.""

- Coupland in The Weekend Australian

Jeremy
Liz’s son Jeremy, who was sent out for adoption, has a terminal case of multiple sclerosis. He has traveled through the foster-care system of British Columbia, residing with many families who abused him. He eventually reconnects with Liz after finding her and registers her as his next of kin for emergencies. When he is hospitalized, Liz reconnects with her son.

Jeremy is cheerful in the face of his condition, happy with the life that he has left to lead. He eventually becomes a successful mattress salesman in the time leading up to his death. He experiences visions of a post-apocalyptic future, which enthralls Liz. He envisions a future where crops have gone foul and farmers ask a divine voice for guidance.

Loneliness
The inspiration for Eleanor Rigby was loneliness. Coupland suffered through a period in his early twenties he describes as being caused by loneliness.

""If they told us in school that there was this weird thing you were going to experience the moment you turn 20, that would have been a great service. It might be just a North American thing but you always have to smile for the camera and give it your best. Negative emotions, or inevitable emotions, never get discussed.""

- Coupland in The Age (Melbourne)

""When you’re lonely, that’s all you can think about. Then the moment you’re not lonely, you run away and avoid lonely people altogether because you don’t want to be reminded of that part of your life. So we don’t talk about it. And when it happens, most people don’t know what it is. They think it must be clinical depression, or an allergy. I think because it is lumped in with depression and other medical conditions, people want to say, ‘Oh, just take your Paxil and come back when you’re feeling better.’ But it’s not like that.""

- Coupland in The Globe And Mail

The title
The novel is named after the Beatles' 1966 song of the same name. The song reference was inspired from a moment in Coupland's past. Coupland heard the song "on a friend's mother's record player. And the story threw me: 'Oh my God, what happened to her?' The lyrics didn't tell you much but in my head I always saw her as an only child of very old parents who didn't have a clue and she was left in a rectory and died without leaving any mark anywhere ... The book's not like that, of course, but it's the mood and the way Liz describes herself." The song itself features in the narrative as it is Liz Dunn's email address.

title: Eleanor Rigby (novel)


text:
Talk:Alice chess

Castling
Is castling allowed in Alice Chess? and if so, for it to be allowed in a particular instance, would the square that the king moves over need to not be under attack on either of the boards?

 * It's allowed. It just has to be legal on the first board.  Ihardlythinkso (talk) 10:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Old talk
In the sample game, after 1.e4 d5 can't White just mate immediately with 2.Bb5 instead of 2.Bc4? Krakatoa 01:06, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * No, because the bishop would move onto the second board, and thus not attack the king. As the article says, "captures [and by extension checks] are made on the board the piece begins on"; probably the article could be a bit clearer on this. I'm too tired to look at it just now, however. --Camembert 01:58, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * (Incidentally, it doesn't affect this comment, but I just changed the 2.Bc4 to 2.Be2, since otherwise Black can just play 2...dxc4 --Camembert 12:33, 26 August 2005 (UTC))

 * Maybe I'm dense, but if checks are made on the board on which the piece begins on, then on 2.Bb5 check (and mate?), the bishop would stay on the first board, right? Krakatoa 16:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * No. Every time a piece is moved, whether it captures or not, it goes onto the other board. So before 2.Bb5 the bishop is on board A (the one on the left in the diagrams) and after 2.Bb5 it is on board B; the fact that it would be giving check had it stayed on board A is completely irrelevant. Captures are made on the board the capturing piece begins on, so with the bishop on board B and the king on board A, there is no check.

 * The meaning of "captures are made on the board the piece begins on" is not meant to be "if you capture a piece, you do not transfer the piece which has captured to the other board" but rather "if a piece starts on board A, it captures other pieces on board A, not pieces on board B". Probably this could be clarified in the article.

 * You're not dense, by the way--Alice chess is one of the more, erm, esoteric variants. Took me about six months to get my head round it :) --Camembert 18:29, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * I think Ralph Betza commented once that he found Alice chess intruiging because he could never figure out how to play it well. I have the same problem with it. I guess it's a common issue?! Double sharp (talk) 13:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

I've added some more verbiage to the article; I hope it clarifies more than it confuses. Better? --Camembert 19:13, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * I dunno. Your discussion of the game ending in 3.Bb5 mate is definitely clearer. This language at the beginning of the article is what confused me:

 * At the start of the game, the pieces are set up in their normal position on one board ("board A"), with the second board ("board B") empty. When a move is played, the piece moved passes "through the looking glass" onto the other board.

 * I didn't realize, until you enlightened me above, that the pieces continued switching back and forth between the two boards. I thought as the game went on, you just ended up with more and more pieces on board B. I have a suggested edit that I think would make this clear.  (I would make it myself, but I don't know how to do diagrams like those you used.)  I would give the sample game 1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5, and show how after the first pair of moves two of the pieces are on the board B, but after the second pair of moves all the pieces are back on board A.

 * On further reflection, I think substituting "Every time" for "When" in the second sentence of the text italicized above would help. I will make that change and see how that looks. But you might consider the further edit I suggested. As you say, this is a pretty bizarre/hard to comprehend variant, so one ought to be crystal-clear so the reader will "get" it faster. Krakatoa 20:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Ah, I didn't realise the problem was not realising pieces could move back from board B to board A. Now I look at it, I see the article wasn't clear about this. I'll try to edit it further so there can be no mistake. As for the rest: I think there's a general need for more diagrams; the game is, indeed, quite tricky, so it's hardly possible to provide too many for the newcomer. I've added some more now; I hope it's not overkill. See what you think. --Camembert 22:25, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Great job! Thanks for all your work on the article. I think it is very clear now. Adding all the diagrams really helps; I don't think it's overkill. Krakatoa 14:58, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

template:alice chess diagram
I have created a diagram for alice chess ( with a double board ). I did not know how to add the coordinates so I simply left the board the way it is. If any one can do this please don't hesitate. --Sibahitalk 10:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

About the rules and possible mistakes
I'm having some trouble trying to wrap my mind around the concept of this game... I think that, for example, the following sentence needs clarification: "pieces may only capture pieces that are on the same board they are on; so pieces on board A capture other pieces on board A, and pieces on board B capture other pieces on board B. " How's that possible, since the pieces move from one board to another — is a capture an exception to the rule?

Also, in the sample game (1.Nf3 e6 2.Ne5 Bc5 3.Nxf7 Bg1) if White played something like 4.a3, would 4...Qh4 be a mate, because the queen would apparently threaten the king in the way the bishop moved to g1 over the f2-pawn? --ZeroOne ( talk | @ ) 23:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Sorry, just saw your comment. Em .. put it this way, a piece on board A moves so that it captures another piece on board A, THEN it transfers to board B. This is the legal scenario. The answer to your question is no .. because the Queen and King are on different boards. (A piece on board A can't move to a square empty on board A but occupied on board B, regardless if it's occupied by a friendly or an enemy piece. --Sibahi 22:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that wording is clear and straight forward if you realize the transfer is the last thing that happens. 24.79.40.48 (talk) 03:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

What's wrong with Sample games ?
Yes, what's wrong with sample games ? And don't tell me because Wikipedia is not a manual. I don't see how, in anyway, providing a sample game, which illustrates how playing this game differs from normal chess, makes Wikipedia a How-To guide. Strategy tips, if they existed, ARE How-to guide.

Also, even if the sample game Yearout-Jelliss counts as annotated text, (which I don't think it does,) the Fool's mate and the Scholar's mate are essential information about the game, rather than random sample games. You might as well delete the scholar's mate article.

Incidentally, you also removed a diagram from the next section, that shows a variation of Alice Chess. Information, not a how-to guide.

--Sibahi 22:06, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Castling and first pawn move
As some people count castling and the first pawn move as two moves (or 3 for castling) executed in one move, do the peices that move the two moves stay on the same board. ie. a pawn moving two squares is counted by some people as two seperate moves executed in one move (and one of the reasons for the introduction of the en passant rule) and when a king moves during castling the official rules say that the king cant be placed in check during any phase of the move including the square the rook ends up in, so its as if the king just moves twice, for this does it stay on the starting board? —Preceding unsigned comment added by J4ck 7he Ripp3r (talk • contribs) 07:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, if two moves are excuted in ONE, I think that it only counts as one move. So if a pawn moves two squares in its first  move, it will go to the other board after reaching its destination.  I also don't think that one can castle in Alice Chess, but I'll have to find out.  Since there are two pieces moving at the same time, I don't know if the king to transfer to the other board or whatever combination possible.

 * O —— The Unknown Hi  tc  hh  ik  er  15:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Castling occurs, and both pieces are transported, in games Yearout vs. Viveiros, Yearout vs. Jelliss, and Veronesi vs. Jelliss. (That's good enough for me!)  Ihardlythinkso (talk) 11:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Again I think this is pretty obvious, It's not like in a normal game of chess castling is counted as two turns of play. 24.79.40.48 (talk) 00:07, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Udo Marks, Mate in 7
Um ... does anyone know where to find the solution to this problem at the top of the article? I've searched several websites looking for this problem and its solution, or any of Udo Marks variants problems, and haven't been able to find. (It seems a little un-useful, to have a problem here, but no way to confirm or verify what the solution is!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihardlythinkso (talk • contribs) 15:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

I sent Email in mid February in attempt to get answer about solution to the chess problem. No reply so far. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 00:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Finally heard from Udo Marks! Stay tuned ...  Ihardlythinkso (talk) 17:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Mr. Marks sent me the mate in 7 solution, and an additional problem (mate in 2) too. I replaced the mate in 7 in the article with the mate in 2; I think less people will be intimidated to try and solve a mate in 2, than a mate in 7!

 * I hesitate to put the mate in 2 solution in the article directly (that would be "too easy"), and think a link to a site where the solution can be found would be better. Stay tuned ...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihardlythinkso (talk • contribs) 10:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

 * "Show/hide" was the best solution for this. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 12:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for doing that, I never would have tried to do a 7 move puzzle with normal chess, let alone Alice chess. 24.79.40.48 (talk) 03:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thx for your comment! Ihardlythinkso (talk) 22:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Three-Man Chess which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:Alice chess


text:
Hits of the Year

"Hits of the Year" is a U.S. single released from Squeeze's sixth album, Cosi Fan Tutti Frutti. The song describes a holiday flight interrupted by a hijacking. It charted only on the Billboard Top Rock Tracks chart, peaking at number 39.

Cash Box said it has "a straight ahead rhythm groove and typically elastic musical shadings."

Track listing

 * 1) "Hits of the Year" (3:03)
 * 2) "The Fortnight Saga" (2:38)

title: Hits of the Year


text:
Rubber chicken

A rubber chicken is a prop used in comedy. The phrase is also used as a description for food served at speeches, conventions, and other large meetings, and as a metaphor for speechmaking.

Description
A rubber chicken is an imitation plucked fowl made in a latex injection mold. Modern day rubber chickens usually have some sort of squeaking device similar to one found in a rubber duck, allowing the chicken to squeak or scream when squeezed.

Origins
The origin of the rubber chicken is obscure, but it is possibly based on the use of inflated pig bladders attached to sticks and used as props or mock weapons by jesters in the days before the development of plastic and latex. Chicken corpses were readily available; therefore jesters could employ them as variations of slapsticks.

One account attributes the first use of a prop chicken to John Holmberg, the Swedish blackface clown of the early 1900s. Similarly, British performer Joseph Grimaldi would perform with his pockets full of fake food to mock the gluttony reportedly prevalent among the upper classes at the time. However, this predates the vulcanization of rubber.

A claim that the symbol originated during the French Revolution, with soldiers hanging a chicken from their muskets for luck, is printed on the tag of rubber chickens manufactured by Archie McPhee.

Food and speechmaking
The term "rubber chicken" is used disparagingly to describe the food served at political or corporate events, weddings, and other gatherings where there are a large number of guests who require serving in a short timeframe. Often, pre-cooked chicken is held at serving temperature for some time and then dressed with a sauce as it is served. Consequently, the meat may be tough or "rubbery". Someone who "travels the 'rubber chicken circuit'" is said to do so by attending or making speeches at many such gatherings, often as part of political campaigning.

title: Rubber chicken


text:
User talk:Sexologen~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Scott Ritchie 01:07, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Sexologen. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Sexologen~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sexologen~enwiki


text:
Jill Trenary

Jill Ann Trenary (born August 1, 1968) is an American former figure skater. She is the 1990 World champion and a three-time U.S. national champion. She was inducted to the United States Figure Skating Hall of Fame in 2002.

Career
Originally from Minnetonka, Minnesota, at the age of 16, she relocated to Colorado Springs, Colorado to train with noted coach Carlo Fassi. Trenary won the U.S. junior title in 1985. During a warm-up in 1985, she collided with another skater, whose blade sliced Trenary's calf muscles and severed an artery in her left leg.

Trenary placed 5th in her first senior national championships in 1986. Later that summer she won the U.S. Olympic Festival. In fall 1986 she placed second to Elizabeth Manley at the St. Ivel International. At the U.S. championships in 1987, she finished second in both the compulsory figures and short program, where she landed a triple flip jump for the first time in her combination. In the long program Trenary landed four clean triple jumps, including the triple flip, and she upset reigning world champion Debi Thomas to take her first senior national title. At the 1987 World Championships, she rallied from 11th in the compulsory figures to place fourth in the short program, again landing the triple flip jump in combination, and fifth in the long program, to place 7th overall. In 1988, Thomas regained the U.S. title, with Trenary finishing second. Trenary placed 4th at the 1988 Winter Olympics. She was 5th at the 1988 World Championships, where she fell on the triple flip in both her short and long programs. Due to her strength in compulsory figures, Trenary again won the U.S. Championships in 1989, although she was defeated by Kristi Yamaguchi in the free skating. Trenary won bronze at the 1989 World Championships.

In 1990, Trenary won both the U.S. and World titles. Her strength in the compulsory figures was the deciding factor at the 1990 World Championships. She was 5th in the short program and second in the free skate to Midori Ito but her top placement in the figures kept her in the lead overall. The International Skating Union eliminated figures after that season. After she won her World title, her coach, Carlo Fassi, returned to live in his home country, Italy, and Trenary began working with Kathy Casey.

Trenary's triple jumps included the toe loop, salchow, and flip, which was quite competitive for a female singles skater in the mid-to-late 1980s. One of her signature moves was a combination of a one-foot Axel into a triple salchow.

In January 1991, Trenary underwent surgery to drain her ankle after she developed a staph infection. As a result, she withdrew from the 1991 U.S. Championships. In March 1991, Trenary moved to Cleveland, Ohio, to work with Carol Heiss Jenkins.

With the elimination of compulsory figures—formerly Trenary's strength—from competition, the technical standard for jumping in women's skating had risen greatly, with the top skaters all attempting five or six different triples. Trenary's injury was slow to heal and she had problems regaining her former standard of jumps, much less learning new ones. She planned to compete at the 1992 U.S. Championships, beginning her comeback in fall 1991 at Skate Canada, where she finished second in the short program to Surya Bonaly, but dropped to fourth overall after the long program, where she was unable to successfully land any triple jumps. She qualified for the 1992 U.S. Nationals by winning the 1991 Midwestern Sectional Championships with an uneven performance: after a strong short program in which she landed a triple flip combination, she was unable to land any triple jumps in the long program. She ended her bid to qualify for the 1992 Winter Olympics in December 1991.

After turning professional, Trenary toured with the Tom Collins Tour of Champions and Stars on Ice for several years. Prior to the 1993 World Championships, the eventual winner and soon-to-be Olympic champion, Oksana Baiul, cited Trenary as her favorite skater for her beauty and style. Although Trenary's early professional competitive career was uneven, in 1996 she skated particularly strong programs, choreographed by her then-husband, Christopher Dean, to George Winston's "Variations on a Theme by Pachelbel", and to Nancy Sinatra's "These Boots Are Made for Walkin' as part of the U.S. team in its victory over the world team in Ice Wars.

Trenary retired from skating in 1997 after developing a life-threatening blood clot in her shoulder.

Personal life
Trenary married British ice dancer Christopher Dean on October 15, 1994. They have two sons, Jack Robert and Sam Colin. Dean's agent confirmed in March 2010 the couple had separated.

title: Jill Trenary


text:
Talk:WABC (AM)

WABC Country
It was stated in the WIKI article that WABC is carrying "WABC Country" on it's HD2. WABC is an AM station, and at the current time, AM HD equipment is not capable of running subchannels. The WABC country format is strictly web-only. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.148.235 (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

WABC Country really needs it's own page, as it is a webstream only feed, pretty much unrelated to the primary station. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.148.235 (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

WABC-AM heading to Red Apple Group
https://radioink.com/2019/06/27/cumulus-sells-wabc-for-12-5-million/?fbclid=IwAR3L_ffOmcFs_Jh6-TQvB_KfNFrs-9HUgWAKt2vmwiLX7AS5nuNeUxdItZk

https://www.radioworld.com/news-and-business/business-and-law/cumulus-to-sell-wabc-am

as of June 2019 there are talks that Cumulus will sell WABC-AM to Red Apple Group lead by John A. Catsimatidis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:3C20:190B:83C:1624:5188 (talk) 20:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

https://radioink.com/2019/06/27/new-owner-of-wabc-looks-to-put-it-back-on-top/

Here is more on John A. Catsimatidis when he takes control of WABC-AM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:3C20:3DA4:61C3:20C3:BDEB (talk) 02:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

AOL Broadcast Fan's contributions
Some person but in quotes about the time this station plays, music and provided some useful information, but has sentences that may be informal for wikipedia, such as WABC was King ect.

 * I tried to clean it up as best as I could, as it was a whole lot worse before. The same user (I'm assuming this, because it was in a similar style even though he's using different IP addresses) also did similar edits for WFAN (when it was WNBC), WBBR (when it was WNEW) and WKTU. They all should be cleaned up, and I shouldn't be surprised if other New York City radio stations get the same treatment sooner or later. ErikNY 02:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Yes, this person is an AOL anon whose contributions have two characteristics: For some stations I've just isolated his/her contributions in a separate section, pending further treatment. Wasted Time R 21:32, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Total recall of every format change, minor format tweak, and tangled ownership switch that every NYC radio station has gone through in the past 40 years.
 * 2) Total disregard for structure, self-editing, wikification, and proofreading.

 * The thing is, this person's contributions throw articles out of balance. WABC has been a NYC radio powerhouse for 40 years now, first as the dominant music station, later as the dominant talk station, yet about 80% of the current article focuses on the one late 70s-early 80s stretch where they struggled.  That's not right.  On the other hand I hate to throw out this person's narratives — in some cases they are amusing, especially for stations that are always in programming turmoil. Wasted Time R 23:57, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I've also noticed similar edits for various TV stations. If you look at the new pages just created at this moment, the user is using a similar format for Kansas City television stations. The same can be said for TV stations in other markets. Something should be done to alert other users who could be helpful in cleaning up this mess. ErikNY 02:54, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

I'm a radio industry veteran who made a first attempt at cleaning up the "disco" section this afternoon. I am loath to delete some of these observations, as the demise of WABC as a Top 40 station was a seminal and sad event for many people, but I did clean up the sentence/paragraph structure, took out the words and phrases that were either too colloquial or didn't make sense, and in general, tried to make this section flow more clearly. I hope the result is an improvement, but it could use another pass or two. Comments welcome. 205.188.116.67 22:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Someone with the same IP as mine (at that time, anyway, as AOL IPs are not static due to the proxy servers) vandalized the WABC page six hours after I had made major revisions to the article. Because of the one line of vandalism, and the later reversion, four hours of my work was lost. Please revert to the version posted at 00:23 on 26 July as I believe it was a significant improvement to the original. I cannot revert the article, as I'm obviously an AOL anon user without an account - yet. Thanks. 64.12.116.197 07:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. ErikNY 13:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

After what seems like a hundred passes, I have taken down the "cleanup" tag on the "Disco/End of Musicradio" section, as it now seems to be conformable to standards. If anyone disagrees, or has a material problem with either the style or content, put the tag back up and state your specific concerns here so that I or someone else can work at fixing them. Thanks. 205.188.116.67 04:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Characterisation of talk show hosts
I changed the lumping of Gambling and Batchelor in with the others between them. Gambling is more moderate, while Batchelor is idiosyncratic. The four in between them, however, are conservative hosts. Wasted Time R 02:24, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Mark Simone
I don't think this edit was helpful. The comment is "tone down the Simone rah-rah". I don't see "rah-rah". This previous information was accurate and relevant and should be reverted. patsw 23:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The removed material included bio info about Mark Simone that's already in his article, material about the announcement of the show that's outdated since the show has now begun, and the statement that the show "is an overwhelmingly success", which is not supported by ratings data (yet). As for the rah-rah, there's contributors that are spamming Mark Simone into various radio articles, I suspect this was at play here too.   Wasted Time R 00:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

 * They're still keeping up the spamming, under the guise of many anonymous IDs. Trying to cram as much PR as they can into the article.  The "super-sub" nonsense is the latest bit of spam.  I wonder if all this is coming from Simone himself, bucking for a promotion. Eleemosynary 05:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

It's not spam. It is replacing information which you keep removing. You also should not be editing this article, since you are clearly not a listener. Any WABC listener knows that they call Simone "Supersub". If you didn't even know that, you are not qualified to be editing this article. -- }

 * Wrong on all counts. Eleemosynary 05:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

WMCA pov
some anon WMCA lover has ruined both this and the 'MCA article with hopeless POV. PMA (not logged in)

 * I have not read the WMCA article, but I agree that this article takes a pro-WMCA bias in the "Rivalry with WMCA" subsection. I would change it, but I don't really know how to accurately point out their battle over listeners and ratings.  The user seemed to contribute some valid arguments, but does not have statistical data to back up those points.  If the section were less opinionated, it could be salvaged into a more coherent section. D2001dstanley 13:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, really, what's up with THAT?
The article reads like it's about WMCA.

It doesn't tell the story of WABC, especially it's influence, significance, etc. at all.

Bad wiki. User:70.111.88.166  06:24, 9 June 2006

 * Youse two are SOOOO right. The WMCA propoganda has been NUKED. 64.12.116.197 11:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Its About Time You Have The WJZ Info
The WJZ Article Was A Stub Since Wikipedia Opened, And Now Thank To You PPL, The Article Is (Nearly) Complete! THANK YOU WIKIPEDIAN HISTORIANS

Frank0115932 04:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Edit wars involving the wording of Supersub
A valid link to an independent news article from a reliable source was cited and removed by another editor. Prior to my reverting this deletion, my independent Yahoo search indicated that Mark Simone is called Supersub. Unfortunately, none of my sources came from reliable sources as defined by Verifiability.

 * The single-source link does not support the article text that Simone is "billed" as a "supersub." The anon editor placed it on the page in order to push more pro-Simone POV PR, as he or she has done on several other pages under several anon sockpuppet IDs.  The info is hardly verified, non-encyclopedic, and should be removed.  And please sign your posts.  Eleemosynary 13:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

 * Disagree. The title of the article has supersub in it. It was properly introduced and cited. Ronbo76 13:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

 * The headline of a single-source article does not translate to official WABC policy. The citation does not back up the article claim. Eleemosynary 02:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Bias regarding current programming
In reading the article on WABC as it relates to current programming, the language someone used in describing their morning shows and some of the late-evening programming had a very distinct slant that sounded more like a promotional tool and less like an "honest" description of the current programming ("honest" is in quotes because that word pops up numerous times in the description of the morning show itself). Additionally, discussion of evening lineup changes also was off-kilter and irrelevancies included. Therefore, the current programming section was slightly revised to neutral language; references to Air America, the "gratingly-voiced" Lynn Samuels and the "Springeresque Richard Bey" were eliminated, but the bulk of the generalities were maintained. 24.117.250.51 06:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

As of September 2010
an obsolete bit of OR removed as both Joe Scarborough and Curtis Sliwa have been removed from the lineup: Virtually all of WABC's weekday lineup—specifically Scarborough, Sliwa, Limbaugh, Hannity and Levin (and to a lesser extent Imus) -- consists of hosts with very similar viewpoints. Former program director Phil Boyce has stated that these programming decisions are ratings-driven, while critics of WABC state that the station's programming reflects a conscious conservative political advocacy. The station's slogan is "News, opinion, passion". It would be good if any future text added characterizing the stations's political advocacy were cited to a reliable source itself independent of political advocacy. patsw (talk) 14:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

WABC Today reorganization

 * This section should be reorganized into sections reflecting the periods of Disney ownership and Citadel ownership (Citadel declared a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in December 2009).
 * Recent (but no longer current) hosts and staff should be in a separate section.
 * No section should be labeled "Today" or "Current", but the current section should be labeled "2010". patsw (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Creation Date of WABC
The article states that WABC came into being in 1953. However, I've been listening to old broadcasts from the Manhattan Room of the Hotel Pennsylvania from October to December 1937 - Benny Goodman. In these broadcasts, they clearly identify the station as "This is the Columbia Broadcasting System - WABC New York" I'm baffled. 96.23.126.179 (talk) 00:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The article also says that "The WABC call letters were once used previously on CBS Radio's New York City outlet, before adopting their current WCBS identity in 1946." See WCBS (AM) – the call sign WABC was used for this NY station (originally the Atlantic Broadcasting Company) from 1926 to 1946. -- Picapica (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on WABC (AM). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130520064915/http://www.musicradio77.com/wabcboard/wwwboard//wabcboard1.html to http://www.musicradio77.com/wabcboard/wwwboard//wabcboard1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WABC (AM). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151223142100/http://hdradio.com/station_guides/widget.php?id=45 to http://www.hdradio.com/station_guides/widget.php?id=45

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

old 45s on youtube
from WABC

https://www.youtube.com/user/WABCRADIO77/videos

109.157.75.97 (talk) 03:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

"Ingram later noted that this was actually illegal under FCC rules, but said that they didn't know it at the time.[33]"
("Dominant Years" Paragraph four) There is nothing anywhere in the "33 footnote" link that says or implies anything "illegal" about the event, nor is it illegal to have a crowd of onlookers chant a station jingle. The statement as it stands is absurd. My career was in radio and I know of no such FCC rule that even suggests anything even remotely like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.160.130.28 (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Tag at Top of article
noticed issued a personal warning on my page because I deleted these tags. Let's have a discussion then. The article clearly has 2 tags for sections, 1 that is unclear and 1 that needs to be expanded. Other than that the article's in good standing. Have a discussion here rather than issue personal warnings about Also elaborate on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RedWarn. RedWarn does not insinuate that 55 citations are not enough here. Sucker for All (talk) 21:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Just an observation; a great deal of the article is unsourced. That is glaringly obvious, to me at least:
 * Subsection WJZ Newark (1921-1923) - half is unsourced
 * has 14 sources. That's not too few.
 * Subsection Takeover by RCA - unsourced except for one sentence
 * all good here
 * Subsection Initial network operations - unsourced except for one sentence
 * 1 source details a short section. no problems here.
 * Subsection NBC-Blue network flagship years - half is unsourced
 * 5 sources for this section more than enough.
 * Subsection Birth of ABC - half is unsourced
 * 7 sources plenty here
 * Subsection WABC's first era (1953-1960) - half is unsourced
 * 4 sources here
 * Subsection Early years - unsourced
 * Could use sources here, but it's the only case of this in the entire very long article. It's tagged appropriately here for now, and I haven't challenged that
 * Subsection Dominant years - unsourced except for one sentence
 * source 33 and 34. also added a nytimes citation to replace a cn
 * Subsection "Disco" era - unsourced
 * same as early years.
 * Subsection "77 WABC, New York's Radio Station" and the transition to talk - unsourced except for one sentence
 * same as early years. subsection tag's appropriate for now.
 * Subsection Early years and success - unsourced except one sentence
 * 37, 38 and 39 go into details here
 * Subsection Under Citadel and Cumulus - half is unsourced
 * tons of sources here
 * Section Previous programs - unsourced except one sentence
 * source 51
 * Subsection Weekdays - unsourced
 * the links for Bernard McGuirk and Sid Rosenberg, Curtis Sliwa and Juliet Huddy. The station also airs The Brian Killmeade Show and The Mark Levin Show all verify this 1 sentence
 * Subsection Sports programming - unsourced
 * section eliminated
 * So, would you kindly explain in detail how this article doesn't need more citations and references? Thanks. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 03:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I really do think, and I hope that my formatting of your post isn't botheresome to you. I appreciate the discussion. Sucker for All (talk) 04:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm at a loss of words. My edit is undecipherable now, you understand that, yes? I can barely comprehend myself what is going on now, and other users likely difficulty reading through this talk section. I feel that I need to draw your attention to Talk page guidelines to learn about talk page etiquette. Also please try and understand Verifiability. All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. Since you keep bringing up other articles like Power 106 (in other talk pages), if you take a look, virtually every sentence has a citation and is sourced; not all, but everything except one section and a few sentences are sourced. Does that make sense? Content needs in-line citations. Doesn't matter if there are five sources in a section or "tons of sources here." The fact is that half the article is unsourced. Take a look at Tutankhamun, Julia Letlow, or even Montana. 90% of sentences in these have in-line citations. If you need help creating named references, please check out WP:REFNAME.
 * I am not going to waste my time reversing your talk page comments now embedded in mine, but please do not edit another user's comment, please comment below their edit. Again, it will be difficult for other users to understand any semblance of what that list is now. Tldr there's still a ton in the article that's unsourced. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 11:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

 * , is correct, you shouldn't be reformatting other people's talk page posts. It's too confusing to other editors. Just answer in a new post. SfA, I think you also need to understand that the absolute number of sources in a paragraph or section doesn't really prove anything. All material must be sourced. We assume that a source supports any sentence in the same paragraph that comes in front of that source and after the last source. That means any paragraph that ends without a source needs to be fixed or tagged. I've just done that tagging, and it's ridiculous -- there are more paragraphs tagged than not, I'm pretty sure. Go take a look and you'll see what I mean. —valereee (talk) 12:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * With respect, that was the proper way to address the issues, on a point by point basis. I notice that I have improved the article by deleting citation needed sections and adding a NYTimes source. Whereas 3 exceptional articles are shown, the majority, such as Barbara Streisand has at least 6 paragraphs that are unsourced. Seems as if a double standard's being applied here. Furthermore, I see no evidence that this contains original research. If someone disagrees, explain here. Sucker for All (talk) 21:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * in the future just try not to edit another user's comment--your method of editing my comment was not appropriate, you probably could have created an identical list with your answers. At any rate, the Barbara Streisand is almost entirely sourced except for one subsection (which there is a section template that indicates that more sources are needed). --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @Sucker for All, how did Barbra Streisand and original research get in here? Sorry, I searched on this page, maybe I missed it...where are either mentioned before this? And, no, that's definitely not the way to address issues. We start new sections. I'll be happy to discuss at your talk, just ping me. —valereee (talk) 22:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * this article had the original research tag; SfA removed it recently. I believe he was invoking the Streisand article because he says that there's "at least 6 paragraphs that are unsourced" and he believes that there is a double standard. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah. @Sucker for All, we discuss this article on this talk page. If there's something wrong with another article, we discuss it at that article's talk. You will find many of WP's 6 million articles have things wrong with them that need to be fixed; when someone doesn't have the time to fix something themselves, they tag it so someone else will fix them. That doesn't mean we have a double standard. It just means those articles need to be brought up to WP's standards, too. It doesn't mean we remove a useful tag on this article because another article also needs to be tagged. —valereee (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

OR
Noticed blue boy has undid this revision twice without talking in the talk page. Which sections does he think contain original research? Sucker for All (talk) 23:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Removal of content
@Sucker for All, I don't understand why you're removing content like Special:Diff/1033674186 and Special:Diff/1033671732? —valereee (talk) 14:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I've restored both of these, as neither seem dubious or like trivial removals. There's a source at that may contain much for supporting the first diff. —valereee (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I deleted parts of the unsourced content. A long section saying that sports programming doesn't exist at WABC's a little excessive in my opinion. Sucker for All (talk) 21:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You deleted the entire history of sports programming at this radio station. Wikipedia isn't just about what's current. It's also about what's happened in the past, and this station was prominent in sports coverage in the past. It's fine to question whether coverage is excessive, but removing content that's been in the article for over a decade is a pretty big deal, and at minimum it needs discussion. If you don't understand why, you shouldn't be removing content. —valereee (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:WABC (AM)


text: User talk:142.150.48.163

title: User talk:142.150.48.163


text: User talk:129.138.2.111

title: User talk:129.138.2.111


text:
Talk:Takab

Here is the original text of the article before translation attempt:

TEKAB (تکاب)is one of the west azarbaijan proveince citie's.it's ancient name is "shiz".tekab is famous because of "takht e soleyman" or " azar goshasb".

- Introvert   talk  01:09, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Takab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429162916/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/afsar-one-of-the-twenty-four-original-guz-turkic-tribes-t to http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/afsar-one-of-the-twenty-four-original-guz-turkic-tribes-t

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:54, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Takab photos.jpg

title: Talk:Takab


text: User talk:142.177.92.106

title: User talk:142.177.92.106


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajitha

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep +9/-0 =Nichalp   «Talk»=

Ajitha
Doesn't require encyclopediac entry rail 01:10, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Expand. K. Ajitha evidently (based on Google search that turned up many references to her and her organization as well as oral history interviews-- apparently her group was involved in a sting operation that uncovered a major sex scandal) is a fairly prominent activist for women's rights and more could be said than is present in the existing article.Crypticfirefly 04:15, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep; Seems fair | Celcius 04:49, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain - --Bhadani 05:09, 26 August 2005 (UTC)More comments: I would suggest the editors interested in the entry to please give some sources, if possible, to assess continuation of this entry in wikipedia. I am not doubting good faith. Thanks. --Bhadani 05:15, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article was previously a copyvio from which could be used as a reference to expand the article. Wikipedia's article should assert her notability more strongly though. KeithD (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep seems encyclopedic, although article could be improved, have made some minor improvements myself. PatGallacher 10:27, 2005 August 26 (UTC)
 * Keep, if copyvio is sorted, as IINAG, at least, intends to fill it out (changed from comment). The Hindu Times remembers that she was arrested for attacking police stations in this article from 2003. Same paper also cites her as Anweshi president here in 2004. Alf 13:02, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but expand: I think that K. Ajitha is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. If it survives this vote, I will try to fill it out somedeal.IINAG 13:59, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as above. Trollderella 16:43, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. *drew 22:06, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Definite Keep She is quite famous (some may say infamous) in Kerala Tintin 05:50, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajitha


text:
User:Iain.mcclatchie/Hydrogen economy

This is the April 1, 2005 version of the Hydrogen Economy article. I've copied it here so that I can attempt a merge of the good work that's been done on that article since then, as well as merge in the data I've collected in the meantime. Iain McClatchie 01:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

A hydrogen economy is a hypothetical future economy in which the primary form of stored energy for mobile applications and load balancing is hydrogen.

In modern western economies, both the primary source of energy and the primary form of stored and transported energy is hydrocarbon fossil fuels. Because pumping the hydrocarbons out of the ground is currently inexpensive (about one U.S. dollar per barrel in Saudi Arabia in 2004), the price of energy comes from the costs of refining and distribution, and from taxation and profits by the various governments and companies in the custody chain between producer and consumer. The price of crude delivered to a refinery in the U.S. is about $50 a barrel in late 2004.

Transmission
By far the cheapest way to move energy around the planet is in the form of oil in a pipeline or supertanker, or coal on a barge or rail car. (Uranium in a high-security armored rail car is even better, but unpopular.) Natural gas pipelines (and LNG tankers) are much more expensive, in comparison, which explains why natural gas from Alaska's North Slope is currently reinjected into the ground rather than shipped to the lower 48 states where it would be worth a fortune. Electric power lines cost so much for the energy moved that power stations are generally located within a hundred miles of the loads they serve, so that energy can be moved as coal, oil or gas rather than as electricity. For example, California burns an average of about 30 gigawatts of electricity, and has a north-south transmission capacity bottleneck (the 500 KV Path 15) of 5.4 gigawatts.

Hydrogen pipelines are unfortunately more expensive than even long-distance electric lines. They are more expensive not just because the electrolyzers and fuel cells cost so much, but because a pipeline carrying hydrogen is much more expensive than a wire carrying electricity. Hydrogen is about three times bulkier than natural gas for the same energy delivered, and hydrogen accelerates the cracking of steel (hydrogen embrittlement), which increases maintenance costs, leakage rates, and material costs. The difference in cost is only likely to expand with newer technology, as wires suspended in air can scale up voltage with marginal material costs, but high pressure pipes have material costs directly proportional to the amount of gas enclosed.

Storage
Currently, both hourly and seasonal national electric load balancing is done very cost-effectively by varying the output of hydroelectric and gas-fired generators, both of which have low base costs. In some cases water is pumped back up dams during off peak hours for even more load balancing. (See pumped-storage hydroelectricity or more generally grid energy storage.)

Although it is generally not referred to as load balancing, the varying rates of supply, refining, and consumption of hydrocarbons are also balanced by storing liquid hydrocarbons, generally in the familiar tank farms around refineries. Such storage is practical because the economic value of the hydrocarbons stored is very large compared to the cost of the tank.

Natural gas is also stored in large tanks, but these are much less common because natural gas is much more expensive to store, as it is a gas. Typically, if the gas would be stored for longer than a few months and a gas pipeline connection is available, it is cheaper to flare it off and buy more when needed. As a result, the primary form of storage for natural gas is within the distribution pipelines themselves.

Some attention has been given to the role of hydrogen distribution pipelines as a load balancing system for unpredictable energy supplies, like wind power. The most obvious competitor is hydroelectric pumped storage. The primary difficulty with using hydrogen stores as a load balancing system is that such use assumes that converting power to hydrogen and back is cheap, which it is not. Because water turbines and electric wires are so much cheaper than electrolysis plants, fuel cells, and hydrogen pipelines, pumped storage is much cheaper than hydrogen storage.

Hydrocarbons are also stored extensively at the point of use, be it in the gas tanks of cars or propane tanks hung on the side of barbeque grills. Hydrogen, in comparison, is quite expensive to store or transport with current technology. As a gas, it is very bulky compared to hydrocarbons storing the same energy, and tends to diffuse through any liner material intended to contain it. As a result, hydrogen tanks are heavier than natural gas tanks (increasing pressure makes the tanks smaller but not lighter, see pressure vessel). As a cryogenic liquid, hydrogen requires expensive and delicate vacuum isolation of some form. Bound into a hydride, the resulting storage is larger and heavier than hydrocarbons storing the same energy.

This last form, hydride storage, is a leading contender for automotive storage. A hydride tank is about three times larger and four times heavier than a gasoline tank holding the same energy. For a standard car, that's about 45 gallons of space and 600 pounds versus 15 gallons and 150 pounds. A standard gasoline tank weighs a few dozen pounds and is made of steel costing less than a dollar a pound. Lithium, the primary constituent by weight of a hydride storage vessel, currently costs over $40 a pound.

End use
The underlying premise of a hydrogen economy is that fuel cells will replace internal combustion engines and turbines as the primary way to convert chemical power into motive and electrical power. The reason to expect this changeover is that fuel cells, being electrochemical, can be more efficient than heat engines. Currently, fuel cells are very expensive, but there is active research to bring down fuel cell prices.

Fuel cells work with hydrocarbon fuels as well as pure hydrogen. If and when fuel cells become cost-competitive with internal combustion engines and turbines, one of the first adopters will be large gas-fired powerplants. These are currently being built in large numbers by a highly competitive industry, their owners can work with operational constraints (tight temperature ranges, low shock, slow power ramps, etc), power to weight is not an issue, and even small efficiency gains are worth quite a lot. If reforming natural gas into hydrogen and then using that hydrogen in a fuel cell is somehow more efficient than burning the natural gas, gas-fired powerplants will do that instead. But there is no serious discussion of fuel-cell powerplants.

Much of the popular interest in hydrogen seems to attach to the idea of using fuel cells in automobiles. The cells can have a good power-to-weight ratio, are more efficient than internal combustion engines, and produce no damaging emissions. If cheap fuel cells can be had, they may make sense in an advanced hybrid automobile.

So long as methane is the primary source of hydrogen, it will make more sense to fill specialized car tanks with compressed methane and run the fuel cells directly off that. The resulting system uses the methane energy more efficiently, produces less total CO2, and requires less new infrastructure. A further advantage is that methane is much easier to transport and handle than hydrogen. Methane used for fuel cells cannot have traces of methyl mercaptan or ethanethiol, which are smelly chemicals injected into natural gas distributions to help users find leaks. The sulfur component of the odorant will destroy the membranes of the fuel cell. Since the technology for running internal combustion engines directly from methane is well developed, low polluting, and leads to long engine life, it is more likely that compressed natural gas (CNG) will be used for transportation in this way rather than in fuel cells for the near future.

Examples
Several domestic US automobile manufactures have committed to develop vehicles using hydrogen. (They had previously committed to producing electric vehicles in California, a program now defunct at their behest.) Critics argue this "commitment" is merely a ploy to sidestep current calls for increased efficiency in gasoline and diesel fuel powered vehicles.

Some hospitals have installed combined electrolyzer-storage-fuel cell units for local emergency power. These are advantageous for emergency use due to their low maintenance requirement and ease of location compared to internal combustion driven generators.

The North Atlantic island country of Iceland has committed to becoming the world's first hydrogen economy by the year 2050. Iceland is in a unique position: at present, it imports all the petroleum products necessary to power its automobiles and fishing fleet. But Iceland has large geothermal and hydroelectric resources, so much so that the local price of electricity actually is lower than the price of the hydrocarbons that could be used to produce that electricity.

Iceland already converts its surplus electricity into exportable goods and hydrocarbon replacements. In 2002, it produced 2000 tons of hydrogen gas by electrolysis, primarily for the production of ammonia (NH3) for fertilizer. Ammonia is produced, transported, and used throughout the world, and 90% of the cost of ammonia is the cost of the energy to produce it. Iceland is also developing an aluminum-smelting industry. (Aluminum costs are primarily driven by the cost of the electricity to run the smelters.) Either of these industries could effectively export all of Iceland's potential geothermal electricity.

But neither directly replaces hydrocarbons. Plans call for Reykjavik's 80 busses to run on compressed hydrogen by 2005. Research on powering the nation's fishing fleet with hydrogen is underway. For practicality, Iceland may end up processing imported oil with hydrogen to extend it, rather than to replace it altogether.

Links

 * European Fuel Cell Forum - Papers by a set of fuel cell engineers, many concerning the hydrogen economy.

 * 20 Hydrogen myths - Published by the Rocky Mountain Institute, a major hydrogen economy proponent.

 * Transmitting 4,000MW of New Windpower from North Dakota to Chicago: New HVDC Electric Lines or Hydrogen Pipelines - Paper study comparing projected costs.

 * FreedomCAR - U.S. hydrogen powered car initiative.

 * Hypercar Concept

 * PolyFuel - Commercial methanol fuel cell technology.

Waterstofeconomie Wasserstoffwirtschaft
 * Yahoo news story on hydrogen powered bus program startup in Iceland

title: User:Iain.mcclatchie/Hydrogen economy


text:
File:Squeeze heartbreaking world cover.jpg

Licensing
The cover for Squeeze's 1985 single Heartbreaking World. From the website http://www.squeezenet.co.uk/.