text:
User talk:Groogle

Blahibty Blah
Welcome i am your father!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 04:23, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Blocked IP
Hi, I got your message. I don't see your IP address among the ones that were blocked. If you still can't log in, can you post the exact block message you're seeing? That will help me track down the problem. Sorry about the inconvenience. --MarkSweep✍ 02:19, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Dead links
Please don't simply remove dead links. Instead, use the Wayback Machine! —Keenan Pepper 07:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

WP Australia
Hi, I noticed you have written on some Australia related topics. You may be interested in looking at WikiProject Australia. a group of editors who collaborate on articles relating to Australia. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 22:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Netkinetic, I think you have got the wrong person here. The edit you reverted was this one by an IP editor. More care and an apology to Groogle may be in order. -- Mattinbgn\talk 02:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Good catch. VP is acting up tonight it would seem. Thanks.Netkinetic  (t / c / @) 03:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

(Outdented) I'm puzzled here. I don't see any relationship to reverted edits. Am I missing something? Or is this unrelated to the heading? Groogle (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It relates to this edit, placed in error on your page and since removed. -- Mattinbgn\talk 11:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Temperature (Cyclamen page)
Dear,

I agree that temperatures should not be reported in Kelvin, but in Celsius (and in Fahrenheit for US users). I wil adapt it.

Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 12:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amyema pendula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sieber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Syce

The article Syce has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Dictionary definition: nothing here sufficient for an encyclopedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  08:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Ukraïne listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ukraïne. Since you had some involvement with the Ukraïne redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 02:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of UTSL for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UTSL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/UTSL until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Velkopopovický Kozel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Diuris sulphurea
Hello Groogle,

I'm working through expanding the Diuris pages and came across your note on the talk page of D. sulphurea. Unfortunately, there aren't many references on the web to most species of Diuris (which is one of the reasons I write about them!). The best reference to D. sulphurea is David Jones's "A Complete Guide to Native Orchids of Australia including the island territories" - now out of print and very difficult to obtain. (I've had to borrow one.) Jones gives the common names "tiger orchid" and "hornet orchid". I'll expand the page shortly but thanks for your note and your work in general. Gderrin (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Mount-Buninyong-detail-1.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Mount-Buninyong-detail-1.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 02:01, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Mount-Buninyong-detail-1.jpeg
You uploaded or restored, File:Mount-Buninyong-detail-1.jpeg, but for various reasons did not add an information block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work: please include own in the relevant source field, amend the information added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add  and an  to the media by uploader or presumed_self tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the information where appropriate). If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:

Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or own, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log].

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

 * If it's own work, you need to indicate this distinctly. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Mount-Buninyong-detail-1.jpeg
Subsequent to the message above, I've updated the file-description page in good faith, to include the own work tag it needed, based on your User page information.

You do not now need to do anything.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Garibaldi, Victoria
Thanks for creating Garibaldi, Victoria.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

"Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Solanum laciniatum) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Solanum laciniatum.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Wolf-tenoroon.jpeg and File:Wolf-tenoroon-rear.jpeg
Hello, both files are here licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. However, on the given website it says that all files on the website are released under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. And this causes two reasons to delete the files at once. Reason 1: WP:F11, no evidence of permission, because the licences are different. The second reason would be WP:F3 - "no commercial use" is not allowed on WP. See WP:F11 for the solution to the problem. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You're comparing two different images. The one on my web site has one license, the one on Wikipedia has another.  There's nothing wrong in that. Groogle (talk) 01:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Southern Cross railway station, Western Australia
Hi there, I noticed you added a note to this article saying something to the effect of "not to be confused with the Southern Cross in Melbourne". Just for your information, this information doesn't belong in prose form, rather it fits into a Template:Distinguish instead. I've already fixed this. Fork99 (talk) 00:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Groogle


text:
Kan extension

Kan extensions are universal constructs in category theory, a branch of mathematics. They are closely related to adjoints, but are also related to limits and ends. They are named after Daniel M. Kan, who constructed certain (Kan) extensions using limits in 1960.

An early use of (what is now known as) a Kan extension from 1956 was in homological algebra to compute derived functors.

In Categories for the Working Mathematician Saunders Mac Lane titled a section "All Concepts Are Kan Extensions", and went on to write that

 * The notion of Kan extensions subsumes all the other fundamental concepts of category theory.

Kan extensions generalize the notion of extending a function defined on a subset to a function defined on the whole set. The definition, not surprisingly, is at a high level of abstraction. When specialised to posets, it becomes a relatively familiar type of question on constrained optimization.

Definition
A Kan extension proceeds from the data of three categories

 * $$\mathbf{A}, \mathbf{B}, \mathbf{C}$$

and two functors

 * $$X : \mathbf{A} \to \mathbf{C}, F : \mathbf{A} \to \mathbf{B}$$,

and comes in two varieties: the "left" Kan extension and the "right" Kan extension of $$X$$ along $$F$$.

The right Kan extension amounts to finding the dashed arrow and the natural transformation $$\epsilon$$ in the following diagram:

 * RightKanExtension.svg

Formally, the right Kan extension of $$X$$ along $$F$$ consists of a functor $$R: \mathbf{B} \to \mathbf{C}$$ and a natural transformation $$\epsilon: RF \to X$$ that is couniversal with respect to the specification, in the sense that for any functor $$M: \mathbf{B} \to \mathbf{C}$$ and natural transformation $$\mu: MF \to X$$, a unique natural transformation $$\delta: M \to R$$ is defined and fits into a commutative diagram:

 * [[Image:RightKanExtension universal property.svg]]

where $$\delta_F$$ is the natural transformation with $$\delta_F(a) = \delta(Fa): MF(a) \to RF(a)$$ for any object $$a$$ of $$\mathbf{A}.$$

The functor R is often written $$\operatorname{Ran}_FX$$.

As with the other universal constructs in category theory, the "left" version of the Kan extension is dual to the "right" one and is obtained by replacing all categories by their opposites.

The effect of this on the description above is merely to reverse the direction of the natural transformations.

 * (Recall that a natural transformation $$\tau$$ between the functors $$F,G: \mathbf{C} \to \mathbf{D}$$ consists of having an arrow $$\tau(a): F(a) \to G(a)$$ for every object $$a$$ of $$\mathbf{C}$$, satisfying a "naturality" property. When we pass to the opposite categories, the source and target of $$\tau(a)$$ are swapped, causing $$\tau$$ to act in the opposite direction).

This gives rise to the alternate description: the left Kan extension of $$X$$ along $$F$$ consists of a functor $$L: \mathbf{B} \to \mathbf{C}$$ and a natural transformation $$\eta: X \to L F$$ that are universal with respect to this specification, in the sense that for any other functor $$M: \mathbf{B} \to \mathbf{C}$$ and natural transformation $$\alpha: X \to M F$$, a unique natural transformation $$\sigma: L \to M$$ exists and fits into a commutative diagram:

 * LeftKanExtension.svg [[Image:LeftKanExtension universal property.svg]]

where $$\sigma_F$$ is the natural transformation with $$\sigma_F(a) = \sigma(Fa): LF(a) \to MF(a)$$ for any object $$a$$ of $$\mathbf{A}$$.

The functor L is often written $$\operatorname{Lan}_FX$$.

The use of the word "the" (as in "the left Kan extension") is justified by the fact that, as with all universal constructions, if the object defined exists, then it is unique up to unique isomorphism. In this case, that means that (for left Kan extensions) if $$L, M$$ are two left Kan extensions of $$X$$ along $$F$$, and $$\eta, \alpha$$ are the corresponding transformations, then there exists a unique isomorphism of functors $$\sigma: L \to M$$ such that the second diagram above commutes. Likewise for right Kan extensions.

Kan extensions as (co)limits
Suppose $$X:\mathbf{A}\to\mathbf{C}$$ and $$F:\mathbf{A}\to\mathbf{B}$$ are two functors. If A is small and C is cocomplete, then there exists a left Kan extension $$\operatorname{Lan}_FX$$ of $$X$$ along $$F$$, defined at each object b of B by

 * $$(\operatorname{Lan}_F X)(b) = \varinjlim_{f:Fa \to b} X(a)$$

where the colimit is taken over the comma category $$(F \downarrow \operatorname{const}_b)$$, where $$\operatorname{const}_b\colon \ast\to \mathbf{B}, \ast\mapsto b$$ is the constant functor. Dually, if A is small and C is complete, then right Kan extensions along $$F$$ exist, and can be computed as the limit

 * $$(\operatorname{Ran}_F X)(b) = \varprojlim_{Fa \leftarrow b} X(a)$$

over the comma category $$(\operatorname{const}_b \downarrow F)$$.

Kan extensions as (co)ends
Suppose $$X:\mathbf{A}\to\mathbf{C}$$ and $$F:\mathbf{A}\to\mathbf{B}$$ are two functors such that for all objects a and a of A and all objects b of B, the copowers $$\mathbf{B}(Fa',b)\cdot Xa$$ exist in C. Then the functor X has a left Kan extension $$\operatorname{Lan}_FX$$ along F, which is such that, for every object b of B,

 * $$(\operatorname{Lan}_FX)b=\int^a \mathbf{B}(Fa,b)\cdot Xa$$

when the above coend exists for every object b of B.

Dually, right Kan extensions can be computed by the end formula

 * $$(\operatorname{Ran}_FX)b=\int_a Xa^{\mathbf{B}(b,Fa)}.$$

Limits as Kan extensions
The limit of a functor $$F: \mathbf{C} \to \mathbf{D}$$ can be expressed as a Kan extension by

 * $$\lim F = \operatorname{Ran}_E F$$

where $$E$$ is the unique functor from $$\mathbf{C}$$ to $$\mathbf{1}$$ (the category with one object and one arrow, a terminal object in $$\mathbf{Cat}$$). The colimit of $$F$$ can be expressed similarly by

 * $$\operatorname{colim} F = \operatorname{Lan}_E F.$$

Adjoints as Kan extensions
A functor $$F : \mathbf{C} \to \mathbf{D}$$ possesses a left adjoint if and only if the right Kan extension of $$\operatorname{Id} : \mathbf{C} \to \mathbf{C}$$ along $$F$$ exists and is preserved by $$F$$. In this case, a left adjoint is given by $$\operatorname{Ran}_F \operatorname{Id}$$ and this Kan extension is even preserved by any functor $$\mathbf{C} \to \mathbf{E}$$ whatsoever, i.e. is an absolute Kan extension.

Dually, a right adjoint exists if and only if the left Kan extension of the identity along $$F$$ exists and is preserved by $$F$$.

Applications
The codensity monad of a functor $$G: \mathbf{D} \to \mathbf{C}$$ is a right Kan extension of G along itself.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Kan extension


text:
User talk:Reminiscent

Just Killing Time
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 04:24, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Reminiscent


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digg (2nd nomination)

This article was speedy deleted earlier today; I undeleted it as 1) it was not a speedy delete! and 2) it shouldn't be deleted in any case IMO. Thue | talk 06:10, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * You're right. I left a message for the admin who deleted it explaining that it didn't meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion. Rhobite 06:32, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * What about recreation of a deleted article? - brenneman (t) (c)  06:33, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's not substantially identical to the text of the previous article, so that criterion doesn't apply. Also, it would be nice if people could take a step back and notice that Digg is quickly becoming more and more notable. Rhobite 06:50, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see an article recreated for this page. I mean take a look at Fark.com here on wikipedia and Slashdot these pages should serve as a sort of guide for the creation of a new Digg page.  I realize that digg is not quite as popular as Fark, but depending on where you check it is comparable to Slashdot.  Yet digg has qualities of its own that distinguish it from these other sites in the fact that there is little overall admin control, and all links that make the front page are there because of end users and not by mod promotion.  I know WP isn't a directory of websites, but i feel this site is deserving of it's own article.   Malo 06:43, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

 * 1) It's easy to say it's not a re-creation, but that carries the same weight as saying it is. None.
 * 2) Thus the appropiate place for this is WP:VfU.  It's pointless go around re-un-re-deleting things, and looks ridiculous to boot.  brenneman (t) (c)  06:57, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. It's easy to prove that the current version does not resemble any deleted revision. Any admin can look through the deleted revisions and see this. If you're not an admin, I can e-mail you the old versions of the article so you can see for yourself. And the only thing that looks ridiculous is for us to have a good article for a number of weeks, only to have it abruptly replaced by a deleted page warning. Rhobite 07:08, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Which is exactly why you should have taken this to VfU. If it is not a re-creation, it's all sorted out and the article plops happily back into it's spot.  Instead we have yet another wheel war.  brenneman (t) (c)  07:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, Zoe should have taken this to VfD but let's not get caught up in mindless wikilawyering. The fact remains that Digg is a notable site and it should be covered on Wikipedia. It looks silly for us not to have an article on the site. Come on, we even have an article about their webcast diggnation. Do you still want me to e-mail you some old deleted revisions to compare? Rhobite 07:14, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the offer, but that's not actually what I'm interested in here. What I am concerned about is
 * Zoe deletes page as "recreated content".
 * Zoe gets a rebuke on "process" and the page gets undeleted.
 * Could we agree, in retrospect, that this could have been handled better? brenneman (t) (c)  15:10, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, this could have been handled better: Zoe shouldn't have violated the deletion policy. Rhobite 18:01, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * And you made things better exactly how again? - brenneman (t) (c)  00:54, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * By restoring an article after Zoe improperly deleted it for the second time, of course. —Lifeisunfair 01:07, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Everyone should start acting less childish, and more like the U.N.. - brenneman (t) (c)  00:54, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * You mean we should endlessly pass resolutions in lieu of doing actual work? No thanks. Rhobite 03:19, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * I was going to write almost exactly the same reply, but I chickened out. :) —Lifeisunfair 03:33, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * There is a lot of activity on the Deletion Log for Digg. I would say this should get a new chance at staying around.  The number of users of digg.com is presently about 27998 (oops, now 28011), much much smaller than Slashdot, but it seems to be growing rapidly.  See Page 934 of the top digg users page, or later pages if the number has increased.  -- 07:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC).

So it doesn't matter that the votes for deletion and the votes to keep deleted were all because the subject was non-notable? So if an article I write gets deleted because the subject is non-notable, all I have to do is rewrite it in other words and we have to go through the process all over again, over, and over, and over again, ad infinitum? Zoe 22:48, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

 * I've undeleted the older versions so that any useful content can be salvaged by the process of normal editing. --Tony Sidaway Talk 23:04, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * How completely inappropriate. The logic there seems to be:
 * A reproduced page is speedy
 * But this page isn't that, so we'll keep it, so
 * Let's get the old page and reproduce it.
 * I'd ask what's the hurry? Why must this page be done today, with unilateral actions like undeleting the older versions ?  What's wrong with a nice slow conversation, where we all agree in the end what should be done.  Unless some parties would prefer to avoid that discussion?  brenneman (t) (c)  00:36, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

 * No, I'm just not interested in the politicking. We've got a notable website and people who are itching to edit the article one it. Let's just remove any and all encumberances and let them get on with it.  Remember we're here to write an encyclopedia, not hold discussions, pass resolutions, etc. --Tony Sidaway Talk  04:34, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

 * This attempts to present the case that an editor who removes is not here to write an encyclopedia, and is an ad hominum statement. brenneman (t) (c)  04:50, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

 * What Tony is apparently interested in doing is the unilateral undermining of VfU. See his decision, despite universal votes to keep deleted, to undelete Francesca Easthope.  Zoe 04:53, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

 * Zoe, I don't know what VfU you're reading, but the one about this article strongly supports keeping it. Rhobite 06:26, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

 * The above comment refers to his unilateral action on Francesca Easthope. Zoe 07:05, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

 * "What Tony is apparently interested in doing is the unilateral undermining of VfU."

 * . . . said the person who responded by disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point.

 * And of course, the present Digg situation stemmed from your decision to unilaterally undermine the speedy deletion process. —Lifeisunfair 11:30, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

The point that I am apparently failing to make is this: You'll notice that most admins have identical powers. Thus any contest between them is not only pointless, but is very poor form. It amounts, in the absence of discussion, to a test of who'll push the button more. I'd like to point out that while WP:BOLD says to be bold in editing articles, WP:ADMIN urges you to use caution. brenneman (t) (c) 04:19, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * If Zoe was wrong, would it have killed someone to put a note on xir talk, providing evidence of the mistake and let Zoe fix it xirself?
 * The circus could have been halted by either party letting the version they didn't like remain while they talked.

 * "If Zoe was wrong, would it have killed someone to put a note on xir talk, providing evidence of the mistake and let Zoe fix it xirself?"

 * 1. As Tony noted above, this is an encyclopedia. The expedient restoration of legitimate content was more important than being extra-special-super-duper nice to the admin who repeatedly violated policy (and compromised the encyclopedia's quality) by deleting it out-of-process.

 * 2. Zoe refuses to acknowledge that the deletion of the new Digg article was improper, and apparently believes that any and all articles by that title should be deleted in perpetuity (no questions asked).

 * "The circus could have been halted by either party letting the version they didn't like remain while they talked."

 * Huh? Zoe left no version of the article.

 * "You'll notice that most admins have identical powers. Thus any contest between them is not only pointless, but is very poor form."

 * Are you suggesting that all administrative decisions (including the flagrantly bad ones) should be respected and upheld as a courtesy among colleagues?

 * Zoe screwed up. Others fixed the mistake.  End of story (or chapter, at least).

 * "It amounts, in the absence of discussion, to a test of who'll push the button more."

 * In this instance, one specific button-pusher was unequivocally wrong.

 * "I'd like to point out that while WP:BOLD says to be bold in editing articles,"

 * Does it say to be bold in deleting them?

 * "WP:ADMIN urges you to use caution."

 * How much caution did Zoe use when deleting the article on a whim? Are you and I even discussing the same situation?  (I'm not so sure.)  —Lifeisunfair 11:30, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Thank you for the litany of personal attacks. Zoe 23:50, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

 * What personal attacks? —Lifeisunfair 01:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

I'd refer you to WP:CIV and WP:DICK. All of your arguments pre-suppose that Zoe was, um, unequivocally wrong when deleting the article on a whim in a flagrantly bad  way that repeatedly violated policy. brenneman (t) (c) 01:49, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * This could be correct. But it might not be. Clearly Zoe thought she was correct, just as the other button pushers thought they were correct.
 * In a disagreement of this nature, neither one nor the other person should presume that their button pushing counts for more in some way.
 * The cheerleading of, "Yeah, we were right, nha-nha" is asinine. Even if you're right.

 * "I'd refer you to WP:CIV"

 * I maintain that I haven't personally attacked Zoe; I've criticized her undeniable violation of the speedy deletion policy and related behavior. Even if I'd wanted to see the article in question deleted, I would have adopted the same stance.

 * My biggest objection is not to the deletions themselves, but to Zoe's refusal to apologize or even acknowledge that they were remotely inappropriate. Instead, she's directed numerous rude remarks toward those who have attempted to explain the clear disparity between the actual speedy deletion policy and the nonexistent version that she attempted to enforce (and cited when accusing Thue of "improperly undelet[ing]" the article).

 * "and WP:DICK."

 * Are you calling me a "dick"? That certainly seems like a personal attack.

 * "All of your arguments pre-suppose that Zoe was, um, unequivocally wrong"

 * She was. Read the policy (which you previously cited as justification for Zoe's deletions), and explain to me how there can be any doubt.

 * Wikipedia is chock full of gray area, but not in this case.

 * "when deleting the article on a whim"

 * Can you direct my attention to one piece of evidence that Zoe made any effort to examine the new article's status before deleting it?

 * "in a flagrantly bad way"

 * It's my opinion that unilaterally deleting a legitimate article is flagrantly bad. You're welcome to disagree.

 * "that repeatedly violated policy."

 * Again, I invite you to read the policy in question, and explain how Zoe's deletion was anything other than a violation.

 * "This could be correct. But it might not be."

 * I assert that it is (and eagerly await your rebuttal). Should I be posting someone else's opinion?

 * "Clearly Zoe thought she was correct, just as the other button pushers thought they were correct."

 * That's because Zoe was wrong, and other admins were right. This isn't a theory; it's a fact.  Read the speedy deletion policy.

 * "In a disagreement of this nature, neither one nor the other person should presume that their button pushing counts for more in some way."

 * I'm of the strong belief that existent policies count for more than nonexistent policies.

 * "The cheerleading of, 'Yeah, we were right, nha-nha' is asinine."

 * 1. Who's doing that?

 * 2. Why is it okay for you to refer to someone's behavior as "asinine," but not okay for me to refer to someone's behavior as "flagrantly bad"?

 * "Even if you're right."

 * Are you under the impression that I was directly involved in the article's undeletion? —Lifeisunfair 03:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Asinine
You're correct, it was uncivil to say that. I apologize without reservation. I also apologise for characterising your contribution to this discussion as "cheerleading", that was also uncivil, and I again apologise.

This point-for-point is fairly tedious, and I don't think any real communication is taking place. Although, and I mean to say this sooner, good use of colour.

You seem to be trying to convince me further as to the correctness of the initial deletion. Please note that I'm not arguing that.

If we leave aside your reiteration of previous comments and pointing out my incivility, we're left with WP:CIV and WP:DICK. Which I again refer you to, noting only that by definition using it as a reference make me one. brenneman (t) (c) 04:13, 18 August 2005 (UTC)


text:
XHBC-TDT

XHBC-TDT is the Televisa Regional television station in Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico. The station can also be seen in the Yuma, Arizona / El Centro, California area.

Digital channels
The station's digital channel is multiplexed:

Televisa was approved to add FOROtv to six stations, primarily regional outlets, in northern Mexico in January 2018.

History
XEM-TV channel 3 signed on from Mexicali on October 2, 1957. It was owned by a joint venture between Telesistema Mexicano, predecessor to Televisa, XED-AM owner Carlos Blando Obregón, and other partners. While its first full day of programs was October 2, it put out a test transmission on September 15 consisting of the Mexican flag and Independence Day celebrations co-produced with XED, and it signed on October 1 carrying the five-hour-long government report of Governor Braulio Maldonado from the Bujazán movie theater, using a remote control unit borrowed from sister XETV channel 6 in Tijuana. XEM was the first television station in Mexicali and the second in the region, after KIVA channel 11 from Yuma.

The callsign was changed to XHBC-TV several years after the station's sign on.

In 2014, Televisa Mexicali was consolidated with the rest of the Televisa stations in Baja California, bringing it under closer management to XEWT-TDT in Tijuana and XHS-TV in Ensenada.

On March 26, 2015, all Mexicali television stations shut off their analog signals. XHBC-TDT remained on digital channel 47, initially mapped to channel 3 via PSIP.

On October 25, 2016, XHBC-TDT moved to virtual channel 4. Channel 3 had been nationally reserved for Imagen Televisión and its Mexicali transmitter, XHCTME-TDT.

Programming
XHBC is Televisa's local independent for the Mexicali area. It carries local newscasts and locally produced programming.

Some of XHBC's resources and news reports are shared with sister stations XEWT and XHS; this is especially evident during the evening Las Noticias newscasts.

Like all Televisa local stations, its local programs are seen on the "Local News" and "Local View" channels of SKY México.

Newscasts

 * Las Noticias Al Amanecer
 * Las Noticias 3 pm
 * Las Noticias 5 pm
 * Las Noticias 8:30 pm
 * Las Noticias 10:30 pm

title: XHBC-TDT


text:
User talk:Ganons-Advisor

Almost at 1,500
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 04:26, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:Ganons-Advisor


text: User talk:4.228.213.151

title: User talk:4.228.213.151


text:
Talk:The urge

When I edited this article I originally intended to revert some vandalism but upon further inspection much of the information presented on the previous entries was invalid or I was unable to find directly. I instead researched a little and removed all that I could not verify. I also found that some of the text was copied directly off of a fan site for the band so I attempted to re-word these passages and removed sections of the article that seemed to display an opinion rather than any factual knowledge. One major problem is the bands name, which is Urge and not "The Urge". The task of redirecting this article, fixing the redirect for "urge" seemed a little much for now, but it may want to be considered. -- Mr . Dude †@£К ║  Çøת†яĭβü†ĬŎИ 04:27, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

Mr Dudes’s edit (or lack there of), or more precisely, Mr Dudes vandalism (deletion) was not consistent with Wikipedia’s “Polices”, i.e. there was a clear violation of “wikilove” and “civility.” As the policy states, one should “please assume good faith when you disagree with someone” and not always assume it be plagiarized. For the past 12 years, I’ve seen this band live multiple times and even had the opportunity to interview Stevie (Atlanta, Variety Play House ~ 1993, opening for Radiohead). As most rock musicians who know THE Urge will vouch for (myself a bass g. player), and ANY real fan of this little known band will tell you, the tone color I used to describe this band is far from “opinion” but  instead more a consensus. As most know, music appreciation is not a science but an art form that will always have some form of subjectivity, just ask any editor of Rolling Stone Mag., not to mention the way The Rolling Stones are described on Wikipedia. Furthermore, one could argue that NPOV was also not practiced given Mr Dude’s choice of reference (music.com), a promotional corporate web site. But this is not surprising given Mr Dude’s self promotion on Wikipedia, another taboo. Self promotion is for a personal web site (which he promotes on Wikipedia), not for the Wiki community. But unfortunately, PR is often the case on Wekipedia. Case in point, Mr Dude’s personal Wikipedia post: “Although he is the self appointed super star of his universe, on Wikipedia none have recognized MrDude's excellence [probably due to the extreme lack of it]. One day he hopes to gain the respect and admiration of others.” Dude! It’s pretty darn hard to gain respect via self adulation and not contributing or expanding existing work. I too have made mistakes on this Urge project, and have corrected it accordingly, hence a work in progress. But deleting other’s work for self admiration is not the answer. Even Mr Dude’s easiest task of constructive criticism at times was completely vacuous, as ascribing the band’s name to, “Urge.” JEEEEES NAPOLIAN! All one has to do is listen to their music or simply LOOK at an album cover to know that their name IS in fact THE Urge! To his credit, his reader interface ideas were instructive and are incorporated (expanded) into the current work. So too was his group bio info which I have not had an opportunity to EXPAND. But CONTRIBUTIONS are always welcome on wikipedia. So let’s try again shall we?

With Wikilove,

M Arias.

Cancer Research Fellow at the National Institutes of Health --68.48.198.206 07:14, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

"The Urge" not "The urge"
I'm not sure how to get that U to be upper-cased.

....and when i search for The Urge it won't show up on wikipedia search... it only shows up for "Urge" which is incorrect... it should be "The Urge"

title: Talk:The urge


text:
Murud, Latur

Murud is the largest village in Latur District in Maharashtra, India.

Murud is well known for its school, Janta Vidya Mandir, where not only in academics, students have made their mark in extracurricular activities too. A lot of students have featured in the merit list published by its divisional board affiliated to Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education (some in top 5). Abhay Mumbare was the topper in Marathwada region and second topper from Maharashtra State. Kho Kho, football (soccer), volleyball are some of the spots where lot of athletes have done well. Sheela Nade was the captain of the Kho-Kho team at the nationals.

Murud is an important centre of trade and commerce as it is well connected by Highway networks to Latur and Solapur as well. Its  Aathawadi bazar (weekly fair) of cottage animals (especially bulls) is well known.

Murud is also known as biggest "Gram Panchayat" in "Marathwada" region. Here is one ancient temple of "Shree lord Datta" whose "pujari Kashinath Maharaj" was one of the great personality. Shivam There is only one government D.Ed. college in latur district, which is placed in murud. That college was closed due to cancellation. [1] harshvardhan bandu khose https://www.esakal.com/esakal/20121017/4621617635240365712.htm

title: Murud, Latur


text:
Helena Regional Airport

Helena Regional Airport is a public airport two miles northeast of Helena, in Lewis and Clark County, Montana, United States. It is owned by the Helena Regional Airport Authority.

The National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems for 2011–2015 categorized it as a primary commercial service airport (more than 10,000 enplanements per year). Federal Aviation Administration records say the airport had 82,673 passenger boardings (enplanements) in calendar year 2022, 82,673 in 2022.

Facilities
Helena Regional Airport covers 1,224 acres (495 ha) at an elevation of 3,877 feet (1,182 m). It has three asphalt runways: 9/27 is 9,000 by 150 feet (2,743 x 46 m); 5/23 is 4,644 by 75 feet (1,415 x 23 m); 16/34 is 2,989 by 75 feet (911 x 23 m).

In 2013 the airport had 38,877 aircraft operations, average 106 per day: 68% general aviation, 14% military, 14% air taxi, and 4% airline. 137 aircraft were then based at the airport: 74% single-engine, 14% multi-engine, 2% jet, 3% helicopter, 2% ultralight, and 5% military.

title: Helena Regional Airport


text:
User talk:Helbrax

This page is misleading. It does not actually talk.

title: User talk:Helbrax


text:
User talk:Audiolo

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. Pavel Vozenilek 04:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Please, clean up the page first: remove c2 as redundant, move the page into SuperCollider programming language, add short textual description to the links, review the article for possible mistakes. Adding link to articles within short interval and as the only activity is very prone to be mistreated as spam. Thanks for undarstaninding. Pavel Vozenilek 15:07, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

 * I'd updates the article and used your recommendations. Pavel Vozenilek 18:16, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Audiolo


text: File:Run-D.M.C. Greatest Hits.jpg

title: File:Run-D.M.C. Greatest Hits.jpg


text:
Seasick

Seasick may refer to:

 * Seasickness, a form of motion sickness
 * Seasick (album), by Imperial Teen, 1990
 * Seasick (film), or Merisairas, a 1996 Finnish-French-Swedish film
 * "Seasick" (song), by Silversun Pickups, 2011
 * "Sea Sick" (Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi), a 2005 TV episode
 * Seasick Steve, Steven Gene Wold (born 1951), American blues musician

title: Seasick


text:
Faeries (1999 film)

Faeries is a 1999 British animated fantasy film directed by Gary Hurst from a screenplay written by Jocelyn Stevenson, and featuring the voices of Kate Winslet, Dougray Scott and Jeremy Irons.

Plot
While waiting for their new home to be renovated, Nellie and her younger brother George are sent to a farm in the countryside, much to George's delight and Nellie's disgust. However, the farmhouse and the surrounding area are teeming with magical fey creatures, most of which Nellie cannot see initially because she doesn't believe in faeries. The first the two children properly encounter is a somewhat crotchety and unfriendly Hobgoblin named Broom (whom Nellie can see) who is (more or less) secretly looking after the farm.

While playing outside, George inadvertently stumbles into a faery ring surrounding a massive, ancient oak tree and ends up in the realm of faeries. Nellie is able to bribe Broom with honey cakes in exchange for him showing her how to see the faeries and how to find and enter Faeryland. Broom warns Nellie not to eat or drink anything while she is there, however, she reaches her brother just in time to see George eating a faery cake. The uptight Chudley informs them that the law of the faery realm states that a mortal who consumes even one mouthful of faery food must remain in the realm forever. Nellie and George strongly — and noisily — protest. The commotion attracts the attention of the Faery Prince Albrecht, the ruler of the realm, who offers them a chance to escape by setting three tasks for them.

What they do not know is that the evil brother of the Prince, the Shapeshifter, and his goblin henchmen, are trying to manipulate the children and the faery citizens (Merrivale, Huccaby, Chudley, and Starcross are the only ones met in the film) to usurp the rulership of the faery realm. The Shapeshifter can steal the throne with ease if he obtains the Orb, a powerful magical sceptre in his brother's possession. In addition, the Prince falls in love with a friend of the children, the pretty human farmhand Brigid, which proves pivotal in an old prophecy that foretells the future for the faery realm.

Nellie and George succeed in bringing Brigid to Faeryland, where she meets and falls in love with the Prince. Later, the children are instrumental in foiling the Shapeshifter's attempt to cause war between Albrecht and the faery princess to whom he was originally betrothed. Once the Shapeshifter is defeated, the princess gives Brigid and Albrecht her blessing, and Nellie and George watch as Brigid is married to Albrecht, and is transformed into a faery. Two tasks down, the children return to the farm, where the faeries have left a fabricated letter to explain Brigid's disappearance.

Later, the children bring Brigid to the home of her friend, whose newborn baby is Brigid's godson (making Brigid a real fairy godmother.) However, the Shapeshifter has followed them, and steals the child, leaving a goblin replacement. Brigid must steal the Orb for the Shapeshifter if she wants to rescue the child. Brigid makes the trade, but is horrified to see the faeries upon her return-now drastically aged, and Albrecht close to death, as the Orb is also the source of the faeries' youth and immortality. Brigid is only unaffected because she has not been a faery long enough to noticeably age. With a little help from Broom, the children and Brigid make a plan. Using a bead, a brooch pin, and a pinch of hobgoblin magic, the group creates a fake Orb. Nellie and George sneak into a goblin party and successfully swap the Orbs. Brigid returns the original to its rightful place in the palace, saving the faeries' lives and restoring their youth.

The Shapeshifter, unaware that the Orb in his possession is fake, marches into Faeryland, believing his brother and the other faeries to be dead. He is confronted by the children, who reveal the deception. Albrecht arrives, battles his brother (who transforms into a mantis-like monster) and ultimately wins.

The Shapeshifter and all but one of his henchmen are thrown into prison. The last one evades detection and runs away. Nellie and George have completed their three tasks, and, as a reward for saving Faeryland, are allowed to consume as much faery food as they desire, without having to remain in Faeryland or complete another three tasks. The film ends with the children deciding to extend their stay at the farm, and the faeries flying back to the tree.

Cast

 * Kate Winslet as Brigid
 * Jeremy Irons as The Shapeshifter
 * Dougray Scott as Faery Prince Albrecht
 * Charlotte Coleman as Merrivale
 * Jane Horrocks as Huccaby
 * June Whitfield as Mrs. Lucy Coombs
 * John Sessions as Chudley
 * Tony Robinson as Broom
 * Fred Ridge as George
 * Carley O'Neill as Nellie
 * Michael Burrell as Mr. Andrew Coombs and Fume
 * Patrick Marlowe as Mone
 * Jessica Martin as Helen and Skrawk
 * Elizabeth Morton as Princess Brigid
 * Tracey-Ann Oberman as Tippycoll

Release
The movie first aired on ITV franchisee HTV Cymru Wales on 9 July 1999. It was not released on VHS in the UK, but it was released on DVD in March 2005 by HIT Entertainment.

It was released on VHS in the United States in September 2000 by Paramount Home Video.

title: Faeries (1999 film)


text:
User:Zercam

Zercam is a made-up username for my personal use. It's an phonetic abbreviation of my name, chosen as an alternative as my original username started scaring users in eBay. Ask me about it if you're curious.

One of my interests are Mp3 players and have a blog page with the latest news and reviews. I do take it seriously, please do not delete my links to it, if I put up a link it's because I consider relevant in that page. If anything, please take it up to my talk page, thanks.

title: User:Zercam


text:
User talk:Lizby

Autotonomy
I've seen your question on the Help desk and have moved the content of your misspelled article to a user subpage at User:Lizby/Autotonomy just in case you want to incorporate more of it in the existing article. Once you're done with your subpage, you can add to the top of the page to have an admin delete it. - Mgm|(talk) 07:24, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

title: User talk:Lizby


text:
Portal:Morocco/Featured Moroccan

 * Driss Ksikes, A journalist and editor-in-chief and director of publication of the arabophone and darijophone Nichane magazine.

title: Portal:Morocco/Featured Moroccan


text:
Our Daily Bread Ministries

Our Daily Bread Ministries (formerly RBC Ministries) is a Christian organization founded by Martin De Haan in 1938. It is located in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and has over 600 employees. The organization produces several devotional publications, including Our Daily Bread, which airs in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia-Pacific, Australia, and Oceania.

The ministry used to produce radio, television, and an online University program called "Our Daily Bread University".

History
It was originally called the "Detroit Bible Class" when founded in 1938 as a Christian organization. It later became known as "Radio Bible Class". In 1994, the name was changed to RBC Ministries. In 2015, the present name 'Our Daily Bread Ministries' was given.

Its founder, Martin R. DeHaan, led the organization until 1965. Richard DeHaan took over in 1965 and led the organization until 1985. Richard's son, Mart DeHaan, was the president until October 5, 2011, when the presidency was handed over to his grandson, Martin, who later handed it to his younger brother, Rick. Rick retired in 2021, and Matt Lucas is the current president as of 2023.

Courses
Our Daily Bread University (ODBU) is an online learning platform offering a collection of courses provided by ministries. It provides online resources at varying levels for topics such as the Bible, Theology, Leadership, and Christian Apologetics. Its courses provide reflection questions, tests, and Completion Certificates for each completed course.

ODBU partners with other organizations—such as the Association of Christian Schools International (ACSI)—to fulfill the Christian Philosophy of Education, other continuing education requirements, and New Way Ministries. The ministry expands its reach under the name Our Daily Bread University by adding courses from global leaders, translating core curricula into multiple languages, and partnerships with on-site education and training centers. All courses are in English, and the organization has options for several Spanish, Chinese, Portuguese, Russian, and Arabic classes.

Media
The publishing arm of "Our Daily Bread Ministries" is called Our Daily Bread Publishing. The ministry publishes one of the most widely read devotional booklets printed, with over 10 million readers per issue, in 37 languages. The daily devotionals are also distributed via short radio spots. The same dual publishing method is used for My Utmost for His Highest, a collection of writings by Oswald Chambers. "Our Daily Bread Ministries" also publishes a series of booklets called The Discovery Series. The ministry's radio show, Discover the Word, originated with Haddon Robinson, Alice Matthews, and Mart De Haan.

The ministries produced a television program, Day of Discovery, which aired on stations throughout the United States and Canada. The founder's grandson, Mart DeHaan, hosted many of the programs. Originating in 1968, it was one of the longest-running Christian television programs in the United States. At first, it was filmed on location at Cypress Gardens in Winter Haven, Florida, but later used various locations around the world. The Day of Discovery programs are also available online.

"Our Daily Bread Ministries" also publishes the Discovery Series, a set of booklets focusing on Bible-based topics relevant to contemporary issues.

Locations
Our Daily Bread Ministries have 35 offices worldwide, in the following locations: • ;Africa

• 🇰🇪

• 🇳🇬

• 🇿🇦

• 🇿🇼

• ;America

• 🇦🇷

• 🇧🇷

• 🇨🇦

• 🇨🇴

• 🇬🇾

• 🇭🇳

• 🇯🇲

• 🇲🇽

• 🇵🇪

• 🇹🇹

• 🇺🇸

• ;Asia – Pacific

• 🇭🇰

• 🇮🇳

• 🇮🇩

• 🇯🇵

• 🇲🇾

• 🇲🇲

• 🇵🇭

• 🇸🇬

• 🇰🇷

• 🇱🇰

• 🇹🇼

• 🇹🇭

• ;Australia & Oceania

• 🇦🇺

• 🇫🇯

• 🇳🇿

• ;Europe

• 🇧🇾

• 🇮🇪

• 🇵🇹

• 🇷🇺

• 🇪🇸

• 🇺🇦

• 🇬🇧

Notable Teaching Staff
As of June 2020, the following scholars have authored courses: • Craig Blomberg

• Steve Brown

• Henry Cloud

• Paul Gardner

• Douglas K. Stuart

• John Townsend

• John Trent

• Bruce Wilkinson

• Darrell L. Bock

• J. Oliver Buswell

• Harvie M. Conn

• John J. Davis

• John Feinberg

• John M. Frame

• Richard C. Gamble

• John Gerstner

• W. Robert Godfrey

• John D. Hannah

• R. Laird Harris

• Harold Hoehner

• Robert Kolb

• Walter Kaiser Jr.

• William D. Mounce

• Roger Nicole

• Peter Toon

• Bruce Waltke

• John C. Whitcomb

• Leon J. Wood

• Wilbur M. Smith

• John Stott

title: Our Daily Bread Ministries


text: User talk:68.48.198.206

title: User talk:68.48.198.206


text:
Elizabeth Allan

Elizabeth Allan (9 April 1910 – 27 July 1990) was an English stage and film actress who worked in both Britain and Hollywood, where she appeared in 50 films.

Life and career
Allan was born in Skegness, Lincolnshire in 1910 and educated in Darlington, County Durham. At age 17, she made her stage debut at the Old Vic. She made her film debut four years later in Alibi.

She appeared in a number of films for Julius Hagen's Twickenham Studios, but was also featured in Gainsborough's Michael and Mary and Korda's Service for Ladies. In 1932 she married agent Wilfrid J. O'Bryen, to whom she was introduced by actor Herbert Marshall; they were together until his death in 1977.

Her first US/UK co-production and first US production came in 1933, and she worked in the United States under contract with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. 1935 was her most memorable year in Hollywood, when she not only distinguished herself in two memorable Dickens' adaptations as David's unfortunate young mother in George Cukor's David Copperfield and as Lucie Manette in Jack Conway's A Tale of Two Cities, but was also featured in Tod Browning's Mark of the Vampire.

Allan did not think highly of the latter film, to which she had been assigned, and considered it "slumming". MGM announced her for a leading part in King Vidor's The Citadel, but she was subsequently replaced by Rosalind Russell. When she was replaced again by Greer Garson in Goodbye, Mr Chips, Elizabeth successfully sued the studio. The studio retaliated by refusing to let her work, and, frustrated, she returned to the UK in 1938. The same year she appeared onstage in the West End farce The Innocent Party alongside Basil Radford and Cecil Parker.

By the 1950s, Allan had made the transition to character parts. Particularly memorable is her appearance as Trevor Howard's brittle and dissatisfied wife in the film adaptation of Graham Greene's The Heart of the Matter (1953). In 1958, she appeared as Boris Karloff's wife in The Haunted Strangler. Late in her career, she was a frequent panellist on television game shows, including the British version of What's My Line?. She was named Great Britain's Top Female TV Personality of 1952.

Death
She died at Hove, on the Sussex coast, at age 80. She was cremated at Woodvale Crematorium in Brighton and the ashes were taken by the family.

Legacy
Her name is on Brighton & Hove's Scania OmniDekka bus 655.

title: Elizabeth Allan


text: User talk:69.211.57.55

title: User talk:69.211.57.55


text:
Get Some (album)

Get Some is the debut studio album by the American nu metal band Snot. Released in 1997, it is the only album that features the band's original vocalist, Lynn Strait, who was killed in a car accident in December 1998 when a truck struck his car, killing him and his boxer Dobbs, who appears on the album cover.

Release and reception
Recorded in October and November 1996, the album was released on May 13, 1997, by Geffen Records.

Australian publication Tone Deaf reflected in 2015 that, "when Snot released their debut album Get Some in 1997 it was heralded as one of the most melodic, groove laden offerings of [the] nu metal scene", adding that "the album found immediate critical favor and won the band a legion of dedicated Snot Heads."

In 2022, Revolver featured Get Some on a list of "Top 5 One-Album Wonders", and labelled the music as a mix of "Red Hot Chili Peppers-esque funk-rock with sprinting hardcore thrashers and rambunctious Bizkit-ian rap-metal."

Personnel
Snot
 * Lynn Strait – vocals
 * Sonny Mayo – guitar
 * Mikey Doling – guitar
 * John Fahnestock – bass
 * Jamie Miller – drums

Additional musicians
 * Dave Fortman – guitar on "Deadfall"
 * Glenn Nelson – banjo on "Deadfall"
 * Theo Kogan – vocals on "Mr. Brett"

Production
 * T-Ray – production
 * Anton Pukshansky – engineering
 * Jesse Henderson – assistant engineering
 * Fran Flannery – assistant engineering
 * Kelly Wohlford – assistant engineering
 * Phil Nicolo – mixing
 * Tom Coyne – mastering
 * Nic Adler – executive production
 * Sean Henning – executive production
 * Wendy Sherman – art direction
 * David Leaman – illustration
 * Jon Gipe – photography

title: Get Some (album)


text:
User talk:Kaippally

Finally!
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 04:33, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Purple swamphen image
Hello, noticed your nice image of the Purple Swamphen. I wondered if you would mind adding the place/country where the picture was taken - as it is quite an attractive variety of the bird, and it would be nice to locate it. Cheers Kahuroa 06:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Species lists
Just for info, bird species lists are normally in taxonomic order, to show relationships, rather than alphabetical. Nice photos. Thanks, jimfbleak 05:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Your article കേരളത്തിലെ രാഷ്ട്രീയ കൊലപാതകങ്ങൾ
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page കേരളത്തിലെ രാഷ്ട്രീയ കൊലപാതകങ്ങൾ to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 08:37, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I have deleted the article for now; if you want to write an article about this topic, please do so in English. Lectonar (talk) 11:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Bats of United Arab Emirates moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bats of United Arab Emirates, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Bats of United Arab Emirates concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bats of United Arab Emirates, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bats of United Arab Emirates

Hello, Kaippally. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bats of United Arab Emirates".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kaippally


text:
Talk:Lilikalā Kameʻeleihiwa

Structure
The current structure of this article is, shall we say, rather odd. The text singles out two incidents and is in such an unseemly rush to direct the reader's attention to them that it places them above the actual biographical info, creating an impression of Ms Kame'eleihiwa and her concerns that is probably unfair. --IslandGyrl 05:41, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

 * You're absolutely right IslandGyrl. I should have put them in the opposite order, instead I put them in the order I found them...I'll make the change immediately. --JereKrischel

 * Hi, JereKrischel, mahalo for the prompt response. See what you think of my latest revisions. Here's my version of the remaining to-do list for the article:
 * Can we not also find an instance in the press where Ms Kame'eleihiwa in her capacity as an activist also said something pithy that even her critics concede was positive and constructive? There's still an impression that "for all her fancy credentials, all she does is carp about ancestry or lack thereof".
 * I think we need to have a numbered citation [2] following the Samoan-actor / Kamehameha quote (also appearing under External links, as I've done for the Brotman/Grammy business). I also feel that the quote is a little long (that's one reason I un-italicised it), but your mileage may vary.
 * Do you have sources for the "writing a book about Hawaiian sexuality" info? Can post/discuss here, doesn't have to immediately go into the article.
 * (Tonality nitpick) To my ear, "another dozen" (courses) does not sound sufficiently "encyclopedic".
 * Style tip or nitpick: I wouldn't capitalize section heads as if they were book titles. I'd just capitalize the first word and proper nouns, as if it's an ordinary phrase. That's why I changed "Recent Activism" to "Recent activism".
 * --IslandGyrl 14:24, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Aloha IslandGyrl, the revisions look great. I will look for something positive and constructive from Lilikala, but it may be that only her most controversial statements have been widely published.

 * Insofar as the Hawaiian sexuality information, I got that information from materials for "Building Bridges with Traditional Knowledge Summit Meeting". Lilikala presented "Ka Le'ale'a o na Kupuna: Ni'aupi'o, Punalua, Po'olua & Aikane (Hawaiian Sexuality in Traditional Times, A Celebration of Life)".  It was orginally at http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/traditionalknowledge/events/sessions/presenta/abstracts/Kame'ele.htm, but has since been moved, and only exists in google cache now I believe.  The google cache page is where I found her biographic information, and I did not edit it for content or style when I posted it to the wikipedia.  If someone actually knows Lilikala perhaps they could solicit her for more recent information.

 * Again, your editing and nitpicks are much appreciated! Thank you very much! --JereKrischel

Cut-n-paste fixed
OK, I have put the history of this article back together here. Lily Dorton has been deleted; if y'all discover that it is a name she used at some point (even if she now disavows it), and it needs to come back, let me know, and I can 'un-disappear' the history of that one. Noel (talk) 01:33, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Notice
This was plagiarized. See http://www.ksbe.edu/about/boa/boa_kameeleihiwa.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.206.209 (talk • contribs) 07:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 14:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Lilikala Kame'eleihiwa → Lilikalā Kameʻeleihiwa – She is a Hawaiian writer and historian on Hawaiian history and culture. I think her name should reflect the accurate form of the language. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Support - WP:WORLDVIEW, and yes I know that it's only a guideline, but those who support it support it. Pretty obvious from her own publications what her own preference is, and if we're taking the view that "no not even the Hawaiian historian and director and professor at the University of Hawaiʻi's Center for Hawaiian Studies can have a Hawaiian name because.. [she's been mentioned in sources without Hawaiian fonts] etc." then we're basically saying that no WP:BLP can ever have a Polynesian-language name on en.wp. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Using an apostrophe in place of an ʻokina is just wrong; either remove it entirely or use the correct glyph. I don't care which one, but the current title is blatantly unacceptable.  Powers T 16:28, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

title: Talk:Lilikalā Kameʻeleihiwa


text:
Saratok

Saratok  is a town, and the capital of the Saratok District (1,586.9 square kilometres) in Betong Division, Sarawak, East Malaysia in the island of Borneo. The last recorded district population was 54,400 (year 2020 census). It is located about 50 km from Betong. Iban forms the majority of the population (51%) with Malay (40%), Chinese (7%), Bidayuh and Melanau minorities.

A majority of the Iban people live in longhouses in rural areas, planting paddy, pepper and tapping rubber to earn a living. Some of the Ibans in Saratok either work on or own an palm oil plantations. Generally, the Malay community live near rivers, fishing and planting pineapples, cocoa and coconut. A majority of the shopkeepers in Saratok town are Chinese.

Events
A main annual event in Saratok is the Saratok Regatta or Pesta Air Sungai Krian, a boat-racing event. This event usually takes place during one weekend in July. Many stalls selling things ranging from food to souvenirs are set up in the car park between Saratok Wet Market and a nearby Buddhist temple to capitalise on the number of people who throng to this event every year.

Facilities
There are three secondary schools and three primary schools in Saratok town and a number of rural primary schools. Saratok also have a pre-university college (Kolej Tingkatan Enam).

There are also Saratok Community Hospital, Klinik Welcare, Klinik PMG, Keluarga Supermarket, Nam Leong Supermarket, Everwin Supermarket, Eco Shop Supermarket, and more other facilities within the town.

There are also four banks in Saratok town (Maybank, Agro Bank, CIMB Bank, & RHB Bank).

Climate
Saratok has a tropical rainforest climate (Af) with heavy to very heavy rainfall year-round.

Notable people
Notable people from Saratok include:
 * YBhg. Datuk Amar Dunstan Endawie Enchana, former Deputy Chief Minister
 * Abang Sallehuddin Abg Shokeran - DBP General Director
 * YB Datuk Ali Biju, Deputy Minister Of Energy And Natural Resources

title: Saratok


text:
User talk:Laurence Payne

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation 04:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Brick Lane Music Hall
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brick Lane Music Hall, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern:
 * No indication of Ntability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 12:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ian Liston
Hello Laurence Payne,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ian Liston for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ian Liston
Hello, Laurence Payne. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ian Liston, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ian Liston to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 13:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ian Liston for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Liston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ian Liston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ian Liston
Hello, Laurence Payne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ian Liston, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laurence Payne


text:
Our Daily Bread (devotional)

Our Daily Bread is a devotional calendar-style booklet published by Our Daily Bread Ministries (formerly RBC Ministries) in over 55 languages. The booklet is one of the most widely read Christian devotionals in circulation today. It was first published in April 1956, and includes writing about the Bible and insights into Christian living. The booklet's title originates from a line of the Lord's Prayer.

The contents include a Bible passage, and a relevant article for each day of the year. It is written by a different author each day, and also features additional Bible passages for people following Our Daily Bread's "Bible In One Year" reading program.

History
In 1938, the ministry started with a radio program called Detroit Bible Class led by Dr M.R. DeHaan. Three years later, in 1941, the name of the programme changed to Radio Bible Class when the listener base expanded beyond the Detroit area.

Over time, the ministry grew, until Our Daily Bread was first published in April 1956.

In 1987, an office in Carnforth in the United Kingdom was opened in order to help distribute Our Daily Bread Bible reading notes and other resources to readers across Europe. This then expanded to offices opening across Eastern Europe, in Minsk, Belarus (1994), Keiv, Ukraine (1997) and Smolensk, Russia (2005) allowing the publication and distribution of Our Daily Bread in Russian.

The organisation had another name change, in 1994, now called RBC Ministries, reflecting that the ministry was more than a radio station. A year later, in 1995, they launched their first website to provide their resources in a digital format across the world.

In 2002, a copy of Our Daily Bread went to space aboard the US. Space Shuttle Atlantis.

In 2003, Spanish readers were served through a new office opening up in Spain. This was followed up by a new office in Dublin, Ireland in 2006.

The commitment to being at the forefront of technological advances continued, with an app for Our Daily Bread being launched in multiple languages in 2011.

One final name changes was to come, with RBC Ministries becoming Our Daily Bread Ministries in 2015.

An office opened in 2016 in Germany, serving German readers globally.

Ministry Today
Today, millions of people around the world use the resource to aid their Christian devotional life, through their continued booklet publications, aided by their app which has been downloaded over 2 million times.

Our Daily Bread remains a non-denominational, non-profit organization, creating a variety of resources to aid Christian devotion. These resources include radio and television broadcasts, DVD, podcast, books, mobile app, or their website.

Their focus remains the same as its original founders "reaching out to people all around the world with the message of God’s love." And, the president of Our Daily Bread Ministries is Rick DeHaan, the grandson of the founder, Dr. M.R. DeHaan.

They employ over 600 people in 32 countries, creating over 60 million resources that reach people in over 150 countries around the world. In Europe, their resources are available in English, Chinese (both Simplified and Traditional), Dutch, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, German, Russian and Ukrainian. They also work with Ministry partners to publish in Bulgarian, Croat, Slovenian, Azerbaijani and Slovakian.

title: Our Daily Bread (devotional)


text:
Talk:Sukhoi Su-35

Unreliable sourcing
This article, which claims to be a Good Article, makes extensive use of unreliable sources (RT, Sputnik, (see Reliable sources/Perennial sources for both and bmpd.livejournal.com (a blog - see the discussion at Reliable_sources/Noticeboard). As such it fails GA criteria 2b - "all inline citations are from reliable sources" - blogs are specifically excluded. How can we fix this article so it is reliably sourced?Nigel Ish (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, you just go through all the "bmpd" links, search for a reference to a source there and replace the "bmpd" links with those sources. And if you are unable to find a source in a particular "bmpd" article, you start googling, trying to find an "official" article on the matter from a "reliable" source. It's that easy. As to the "RT", it's not blacklisted, and pay attention to the phraseology - it says "generally unreliable", pointing to the propagandistic nature of the company. So, the solution there is to remove all the politically-coloured "RT" links (if you would be able to find such there) and keep all those pointing to some procurement-related or technical information. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * As an example, the RT cite is about Russian operations in Syria, which is about as political subject as you can get, and is exactly the sort of thing that we cannot trust bad sources for. Of course non of this helps when editors are determined to keep bad sources in - for example reading the RT source when it wasn't needed as I found an actual reliable source (the Air International article) to replace it.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:52, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Of course it isn't necessarily just those three sources that may be the problem? What makes Defenceweb.co.za a WP:RS? What about some of the other Russian language sources such as avia.pro - do they pass WP:RS?Nigel Ish (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Just get on and delete the unreliable cites, leave behind what you can case-by-case until better sources come along. This article is now on my watchlist. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Sheer factology does not leave any space for polititcs. If, for example, some "RT" article is telling that on a date X some plane of a model Y performed some operation in Syria, or that on a date X a system Y was deployed there, it's not politics - it's nothing other than a report, and there's no reason to remove it whatsoever. Especially if it's verifiable through other sources, which is usually the case when it comes to military operations in Syria or elsewhere. So, simply having a particular "questionable" source provider in a supposedly political section is not really a justification for purging. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 20:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, purleeeze! Of course reporting on the battle minutiae of a politically-charged war is itself politically charged, don't treat us as simpletons here. The cite has to go. The claims it supports must be taken case by case. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * "Politically-charged war" is a value judgment and is misplaced here. You are an editor on Wikipedia, you're not supposed to pick sides, and you are certainly doing so by automatically classifying any Russian sources on a particular topic as propaganda. Which is understandable to a degree, but at the same time disgusting. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 20:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Almost two hundred notes for a not especially long article - it looks as if a lot of the content has been challenged for one reason or another. Glancing through it there is still a fair amount of cruft that would be better cut out - wordiness for its own sake, excessive discussion of minor merits, editorial commentary, etc. I just trimmed the lead here to show what I mean. To get to the point, it is firm policy on Wikipedia that content which is not supported by RS has no place here and should be deleted. This article has an air of over-enthusiastic bigging up without adequate sourcing, countered by not quite enough encyclopedic cold water - as yet. If content is not reliably sourced and not core to the article, it is best cut out, and that will also much improve overall focus and readability. A site like RT should not be cited unless it is transparent that propaganda is not an issue in the particular instance. Stuff that is obviously core to the topic, say performance figures or unusual design features, and is likely to be available from RS elsewhere, can be cn tagged rather than deleted - but the dodgy cite should go straight away. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC) (updated 20:04, 23 February 2020 (UTC))
 * I'd speedy fail any GAN which uses obviously unreliable sources like RT and Sputnik as this violates GA criterion 2b. The use of such sources is usually also associated with other serious problems with articles. As such, this article doesn't meet the GA criteria at present, and re-assessment seems sensible. Nick-D (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

On the claim that Rafale successfully jammed Su-35 in war game, that pointed to Global Defense Corp. The site itself, cited Breaking Defense, which has zero mentions about the incident. Here is the original article. Also, Global Defense Corp's section "What We Do", explicitly mentions about its political agenda - against Putinism, Russian propaganda, ...,etc. Which is far from "unbias." Duqus (Talk)

Supermanoeuverability
The quote in the article on supermanoeuvrability appears to be going off-topic. Although it originated with the pilot's experience of flying this plane, it comes across not as about the plane but about supermanoeuvrability in combat. Also the boxout is mannered, unsuited to assisted readers and not what we usually do. If the quote is to be kept then it needs to be integrated into the main text and the relevance to the article explained. I have copied it (inline) to the article on supermanoeuverability, but in this article should it stay or should it go? I think it should go. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 21:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Of course, it should stay: firstly, it originates from the interview given right after the airshow with the Su-35S, secondly, it clarifies why with the Su-35 the emphasis is made on supermaneuverability and how a pilot may utilize these plane capabilities in combat. So, it's not off-topic by any means. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 22:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Query about weapons loadout/configuration
In the "Specifications" section it says "12 hardpoints, consisting of 2 wingtip rails, and 10 wing and fuselage stations with a capacity of 8,000 kg (17,630 lb) of ordnance, with provisions to carry combinations of: ...", then all the ordnance that an Su-35 can carry is listed. As long as the 8,000kg limit isn't exceeded, can any 12 weapons be chosen? And is it 1 missile per hardpoint or is it possible to fit more than 1 missile to one hardpoint? In the image at the top of this page https://world-defense.com/threads/f15-ex-overview-specification-performance.5825/ it seems that more than 1 missile is attached to each hardpoint or am I mistaken about that? If I'm correct, is the Su-35 able to do the same? Also what are the weight limits for each hardpoint? i.e. how much weight can each of the 12 hardpoints carry? This article https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/yes-russias-su-35-jet-fighter-one-best-ever-made-128082 says "twelve to fourteen weapons hardpoints". Can someone explain this please? What are the 13th and 14th hardpoints used for? There's a diagram here https://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Su-35S-Flanker.html about a quarter of a way down the page that appears to indicate that the Su-35 can only carry 5 anti-ship missiles, but it also looks like it's possible to carry 2 Kh-31s in addition to 5 Kh-59s since the 2 Kh-31s can use different hardpoints, so that would make 7 anti-ship missiles, not 5. I find this all very confusing. If anyone could clarify any of the above I'd appreciate it. I also think the article needs tweaking a bit to make all the above a lot clearer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.117 (talk) 08:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Su-27M is a completely different aircraft
Current Su-35 and Su-27M are two branches of Flanker family but they are not connected. "The type was originally developed by the Soviet Union from the Su-27 and was known as the Su-27M. " - is about now cancelled Su-27M NOT about current Su-35. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XaHyMaH (talk • contribs) 15:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Hi Gregg, you are absolutely correct. Four SU-35’s did come to RAF Scampton shortly after the Gorbachev High Treason act, and flew an early evening display for the benefit of any airbase staff and families, which is how I came to see it. About 200 people were in attendance. Adam Cattle, you know SDS, 07434 287874 2A00:23C7:5F8C:2901:CCDE:3164:CB51:60BA (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Operations during 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine / Combat Loss
Photos have emerged of the burning remnants of what has been identified as a Su-35. Claims being made that this was shot down by Ukraine, likely on April 3rd. Reddit ORYX

Obviously an ongoing conflict, but maybe this should be added? Or maybe a section about hull losses more generally? 98.45.185.205 (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

I support the above proposal. We need to add a section to give unbias coverage of the dozens of these airframes shot down during the unprovoked Ruzzian attack on Europe. We know of the following so far: 4 shot down by friendly fire, 6 shot down by the Ghost of Kyiv, 4 shot down by Patriot batteries, and 7 shot down by Ukrainian Heros via other air defense systems. That is 21 confirmed losses and a significant amount of their inventory. In addition, it should be highlighted that they can no longer be used in the conflict or enter Ukraine airspace due to a lack of pilots and fear of additional losses. We cannot allow this article to be overtaken by the Putin Bots and paid agents. We have to stay neutral and report facts as best we can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.97.64.107 (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

It is |being reported on Popular Mechanics too. A recent example of one being blown out of the sky I would think is noteworthy. -- Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 22:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Dubious source claiming technology transfer to US/UK?
There is a lot of misleading articles on this website (eurasiantimes) such as: I've found this claim nowhere else than on this website

https://eurasiantimes.com/category/south-asia/ The website is promoting a lot Indian technology and possessed Indian Air Force fighters

For the main claim of su-35 technology being transferred to UK and USA, i've found only one outlet talking about it, the express: https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1597094/Russia-fighter-jet-putin-latest citing the RUSI think tank, meanwhile i've found nothing on RUSI about this claim

This should be labelled as a simple claim or thought to have been transferred, there is no reliable sources to make a direct claim that this transfer happened, beside a claim from theexpress which got relayed on that kind of website — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsunet (talk • contribs) 10:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Su-35 crashed on 2023/05/13 in Bryansk Russia as part of Russian-Ukraine War
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5985387

Does Kommersant count as a reputable source? 2600:1700:B7B0:4D70:CD89:2013:75BC:2CDF (talk) 18:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Pronunciation of "Су"
There is a common misconception about how Russian aircraft are supposed to be pronounced. The "Su" in Sukhoi aircraft is not an acronym. It is Су from Russian transliterated into English. As such, this aircraft along with all other Sukhoi aircraft with Су in their aircraft designation are pronounced like "sue" in English. Note that all the aircraft pages have an uppercase S and a lowercase u. That's not standard for how acronyms are used anywhere in English so I don't know why some of you think this is a special case. It's not. It's pronounced Su just like how it's spelled. Not S.U. By Russian convention it is an abbreviation of the manufacturer. They pronounce it like they would the first part of the full word. If you want to claim it's actually an acronym what does it even stand for? If you can't even come up with an explanation stop reverting my correct edits.24.233.97.244 (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * See unified discussion at Talk:Sukhoi Su-57.  Mr.choppers |   ✎  16:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Sukhoi Su-35


text:
User:Zertz

My home, this is. Yeah.

title: User:Zertz


text:
Panshet Dam

Panshet Dam, also called Tanajisagar Dam, is a dam on the Ambi river, a tributary of the Mutha River, about 50 km southwest of the city of Pune in western India.The dam was constructed in late 1950s for irrigation and, along with three other dams nearby, Varasgaon, Temghar and Khadakwasla, it supplies drinking water to Pune.

History
Panshet Dam burst in its first year of storing water on 12 July 1961, when the dam wall burst, because of the total absence of reinforced cement concrete (RCC) strengthening in the conduit through the earthen dam. Plain unreinforced concrete blocks were used instead due to a shortage of steel. causing massive flooding in Pune. An estimated 1,000 people died from the resulting flood.

Location
It is about 50 km from Pune and about 180 km from Mumbai.

Specifications
The height of the dam above its lowest foundation is 63.56 m while the length is 1039 m. The volume content is 4.190 km3 and gross storage capacity is 303000 m3.

Purpose

 * Irrigation
 * Water supply

title: Panshet Dam


text:
CDV

CDV may refer to:

Criminal Domestic Violence
 * cdv Software Entertainment, a German video game publisher
 * Canine distemper virus
 * Carte de visite, a 19th-century photograph format
 * CD Video, a video format
 * CDV Records, Cosima De Vito's record label
 * Merle K. (Mudhole) Smith Airport, Cordova, Alaska, US, IATA Code
 * 405 in Roman numerals
 * Compagnia della Vela, known as CDV
 * Car-derived van

title: CDV


text:
Lewistown Municipal Airport

Lewistown Municipal Airport is two miles southwest of Lewistown, in Fergus County, Montana. It is owned by the city and county.

Federal Aviation Administration records say the airport had 596 passenger boardings (enplanements) in calendar year 2008, 1,049 in 2009 and 704 in 2010. The National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems for 2011–2015 called it as a general aviation airport (the commercial service category requires 2,500 enplanements per year).

Scheduled air service temporarily ceased on March 8, 2008, when Big Sky Airlines ended operations in bankruptcy. Great Lakes Airlines was given USDOT approval to take over Essential Air Service (EAS) and flights began in 2009. Service was then provided under EAS contract by Silver Airways (formerly Gulfstream International Airlines) until July 2013. EAS subsidies were terminated on July 15, 2013 due to subsidy per passenger exceeding $1000, leaving Lewistown without scheduled air service.

History
Lewistown Army Airfield was built in 1942 as one of four training facilities for B-17 Flying Fortress crews and had a storage site for the top secret Norden Bombsight.

Lewistown was a satellite field for Great Falls Army Air Base. Squadrons were trained in navigation in addition to receiving gunnery and bombing practice. After training, the men were sent to the European front.

The airfield was in operation during a 12-month period between 1942 and 1943 and thereafter deactivated. The field was declared surplus in 1948 and has been a municipal airport ever since.

Historical airline service
Inland Air Lines began the first scheduled commercial air service to Lewistown in the late 1930's with a route from Cheyenne, Wyoming to Great Falls, Montana making stops at Casper, Sheridan, Billings, and Lewistown. Inland was acquired by Western Airlines in 1944 and merged into Western in 1952. By then the route was originating at Denver, Colorado and stops were made at Cheyenne as well all other cities mentioned. Western eneded service to Lewistown about 1960.

The original Frontier Airlines (1950-1986) served the airport from 1960 through 1980 with nonstop flights to Billings and Great Falls in Montana as well as direct flights to Denver, Salt Lake City and other destinations in the U.S. intermountain west. Frontier began their service using Douglas DC-3 piston aircraft but soon upgraded using Convair 340's and later to Convair 580 turbo props by the mid-1960's. Service was briefly suspended in 1970 but returned in 1971 with de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter aircraft.

Big Sky Airlines then served Lewistown from 1980 until 2008 operating commuter airline flights on a Billings - Lewistown - Havre, Montana route. Big Sky also operated as a Northwest Airlink code-share affiliate for Northwest Airlines.

Great Lakes Airlines then served the airport from 2008 through 2011 with direct flights to Denver making a stop at Worland, Wyoming.

Silver Airways was the final air carrier to serve Lewistown providing service on a Billings - Lewistown - Havre route from 2011 until July 15, 2013.

Facilities
The airport covers 2,200 acre at an elevation of 4,170 feet (1,271 m). It has three asphalt runways: 8/26 is 6,100 by 100 feet (1,859 x 30 m), 3/21 is 5,600 by 100 feet (1,707 x 30 m), and 13/31 is 4,102 by 60 feet (1,250 x 18 m).

In 2011 the airport had 16,804 aircraft operations, average 46 per day: 81% general aviation, 15% air taxi, and 4% military. 58 aircraft were then based at the airport: 85% single-engine, 10% multi-engine, and 5% helicopter.

title: Lewistown Municipal Airport