text:
Talk:John Taylor

Untitled
_ _ Nice work by CatherineMunro cleaning up after me. (I'm much less committed to material inside comments being pretty, but embarrassed by the under-proofreading i committed under the stress of terminal problems.) _ _ I find excellent the ignoring of middle names and treating nicknames and the formal version equally. My only quibble is in preferring, over "DoB order", "DoD order, or, if alive, DoB order": most people (i.e., in the absence of a severe dotage) retain or enhance their notability until death, but see a drop-off of mentions at that point, followed by a gradual decline. So the most notable people are the oldest living ones, then other living ones, then the most recently dead. I think we'd drive people crazy by putting them in that order, but the reverse of it: most-likely-to-be notable last, lets heavy users get used to jumping to the end of the list & working back up. _ _ I'm more interested in seeing how people think that works, than in seeing it "win"; that experiment is my intention in reworking CM's fine work in John Taylor. _ _ Finally, i dropped vital stats that are redundant bcz they appear in the Dab'g suffix of the corresponding article title. --Jerzy•t 20:28, 2005 August 29 (UTC)

 * Thanks, Jerzy! I considered some sort of "notability order", but it seems it would be very subjective and difficult to maintain, especially with many long-deceased figures.  Your system may be a better way of approximating notability in an objective way, but is slightly more difficult for readers and future editors to understand.  However, the sections are small and organized enough now that it shouldn't be hard for people to find what they're looking for regardless.  I don't feel strongly either way -- I'd say let your system stand unless/until someone else questions it or decides to change it.  — Catherine\talk 00:16, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * That just goes to show you how clueless [big wink] you can be and still contribute valuably here. I refer of course to the ludicrous vision of permanence: that should read
 * ...stand unless/ until someone else questions it or decides to change it.
 * Another hour or two, i figure. And praise be to WP for that! [smile] --Jerzy•t 18:25, 2005 August 30 (UTC)
 * (Speaking of clueless, i just reviewed before saving, and realized that i am the only one clueless enuf to think anyone might seriously consider nobility order. [blush] --Jerzy•t 18:25, 2005 August 30 (UTC)

Too Many
Aren't there a few too many John Taylor's too list them all? I think perhaps this list needs to have some of the people without articles removed.

134.250.72.142 01:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

 * The purpose of this page is not to list anybody with that name. People listed here are generally already included elsewhere. If we remove them here, it will be even more complicated to figure out of which new links on Special:Whatlinkshere/John Taylor. -- User:Docu

 * I agree that there are a lot of names, so I added the disambig-cleanup template to it. Would it be appropriate to create sub-disambiguation pages?  Or perhaps a list that is collapse-able by section?  Feel free anyone who wants to take the cleanup template off again.  B Fizz (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Help!!
Some "numbered" person has gone and replaced the large disambig page with an article on a single person, perhaps himself, I dunno. Needs a revert, I can't do it, only have time to raise the alarm. ;Bear 18:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I've fixed it (and haven't moved the anon's added text elsewhere as it's a copyvio). I've also left a note on the anon's talk page, though the single contrib isn't promising for the contributor to actually see my message.  Ah well. -- Jonel | Speak 00:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

 * This is the same copyvio I reverted from User:Harcle the other day. — Catherine\talk 01:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Rt Rev John Taylor, sometime Bishop of Glasgow and Galloway
Whilst working on links on the current Bishop of Glasgow and Galloway - Most Rev Idris Jones, I have come to a potential link to his predecessor - John Taylor (yes another one). Not sure whether there should a live link or not. At present it stops at this page, however potential this can be pulled back to the page for Idris Jones.

Thoughts please -- Pencefn 18:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

 * For the time being I have removed this John Taylor from the list

 * -- Stewart 21:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Edits March 20-23 2008
Page was flagged for disambiguation clean-up. I've made the following changes and have re-added the disambiguation clean-up tag since it still needs more clean-up; the page still has red links and could use further categorisation. Marchije (talk) 21:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed red link to John Taylor (Oxford). Unable to find anything of note about him on the web to create a stub page for him.  His name is already included on List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of Oxford.
 * Removed red link to John Taylor (blues), singer/guitarist, leader of Johnny Widebars & The Shovelheads, as their notability is questionable and I am unable to find references to them from reliable sources
 * Removed reference to "John Taylor (Founder of Total Siding LLC) (1985-present)" as their notability is questionable
 * Created stubs for: John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Holbeach, John Taylor (Canadian politician), John Taylor (Civil Engineer), John Taylor (captain), John Taylor (paper manufacturer) and John Bigelow Taylor
 * There were also two red-links for a filmaker: John Taylor documentary film-maker) (1914–1992) and John Taylor (filmmaker) (1921–1982?), British documentary filmmaker.
 * I have a feeling this is the same person, because there is definitely a documentary filmmaker who lived from 1914-1992 and who was also from London
 * I have created stub page titled John Taylor (documentary filmmaker) for this person.

Edits March 27 2008

 * Created page for John Taylor (hymn writer)
 * Removed reference to Apaloosa horse breeder since I am unable to find information from verifiable sources
 * Also reorganised some of the categories:
 * Added "Arts" heading and moved some of the names from Businessmen and Tradesmen to that category.
 * Created "Music" subheading to "Arts" and added names from "Musicians" heading
 * Created "Notorious figures" heading
 * I have also listed names in these new categories alphabetically by page title, versus birthdate and so I also removed embedded comment: "Names in each group are in roughly chronological order by date of death, or if living, by birthdate."
 * Placed categories in alphabetical order by heading
 * Created dab John Taylor (given name) and moved entries there
 * Created "See Also" heading and moved links to Taylor and John Taylor (given name) to that section

There are still some read links but I don't think the list could be broken down much more so I didn't bother reflagging for clean-up. I may however take another stab at creating some more stubs for those red links. Marchije (talk) 02:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:John Taylor


text:
Talk:Third Temple

Correct names for the First and Second Temples
Discussion about the correct names for the First and Second Temples at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Temple discussion at ANI
In response to above, please see Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents where you may want to add your views to the ongoing discussion. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 05:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Rebuilding a Temple that Hasn't Been Built?
Throughout this article are references to "rebuilding" the third temple. To me, this doesn't make much sense, since you can't rebuild something that doesn't exist yet. Either the Temple is being rebuilt a third time, or you're building a Third Temple. I suggest a rework of the text to reflect this. (unless someone can site a theological reference where the third temple will be built, destroyed, and rebuilt - and this is why I'm mentioning it rather than making the change myself.) Scbritton (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC) it is the rebuilding of the previous temples, its just a bit of a different design — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.8.151.45 (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Sacrifices at Bar Kochba era Third Temple
I once attended a lecture that cited the claims of some historians, based on textual and numismatic evidence, that Bar Kochba completed a Temple and started sacrifices. I will add material when I can find suitable references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricardianman (talk • contribs) 20:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

RfC:Proper Name for this Article
NOTE: The following involves three related articles, please comment on all you see fit:
 * 1) Talk:Solomon's Temple/Archive 2
 * 2) Talk:Second Temple of Jerusalem
 * 3) Talk:Third Temple

What is the most appropriate name for this article in the English wikipedia project? Further suggestions should be placed as subsections below, and arguments should be placed in the section corresponding to the desired name. -- Avi (talk) 17:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Third Temple

 * Support, no need for disambiguation (no other articles yet with this title, and if there ever comes another, it can be created with some necessary disambiguation). The current one is clearly by far the primary topic for the search term "Third Temple". We don't clarify things in titles anywhere. We have Maus, not Maus (graphic novel). King can be many things, from placenames to popbands, but these are listed at the disambiguation page, while the primary topic gets the "simple" title. We have Jacob for the Biblical figure, even though there are many, many other famous Jacobs. Ur is about the city, not any of the other existing articles on Ur. Fram (talk) 07:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

 * Oppose Third Temple is a misleading name not ony because this is a matter of belief, not of ashlars and pilasters, but because Herod's Temple is often called ''the Third Temple," especially by those (a minority opinion) who believe that te Second Temple was razed by Herod and replaced.AMuseo (talk) 11:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Most common name in the English language and no pressing need for disambiguation. -- Avi (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per name and lack of apparent need for disambiguation. John Carter (talk) 20:27, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per John Carter. Chesdovi (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per John Carter -- Jeff3000 (talk) 13:09, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. JFW | T@lk  12:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Third Temple (Judaism)

 * As I stated in my argument] for the Second Temple (of Jerusalem)/Herod's Temple, calling this article by the name "Third Temple" is too open to mis-interpretation and confusion with other faiths. Thus, adding in the (Judaism) addition allow readers to understand that this is an idea specific toward the Jewish faith. I believe this is especially true because this article is a "notion and desire" and not a physical place as of yet. And, on the other hand, because it is a notion and not a place, it is something that is generally only spoken of by historians and those within the Jewish faith, so the name Ezekiel's Temple might not be understood in a clear sense. For these reasons, I believe "Third Temple (Judaism)" to be the most accurate title for the subject. Silver  seren C 18:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support, per Silver seren here. IZAK (talk) 04:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per Silver Seren, unless there is any controversy (which I am not aware of) in labelling this as a Jewish concept. --FormerIP (talk) 22:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per Silver. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 15:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Third Temple is the standard name used when studying Jewish culture. The (Judaism) part is necessary because the expression by itself could refer to other temples that are third. Kuratowski's Ghost (talk) 22:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. This is the logical and consistent companion to First Temple (Judaism) and Second Temple (Judaism). While there doesn't seem to be any disagreement on calling them "Second Temple" and "Third Temple", the deciding factor is the naming of "First Temple". This must be called First Temple (Judaism) because other religions have their temples, too. Yoninah (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per Silverseren. --Shuki (talk) 23:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Future Temple

 * Support, with or without some addition, such as Future Temple of Jerusalem, Future Temple (Judaism), Future Third Temple, or Future Jewish Temple. This would remove any ambiguation about Herod's Temple being the 3rd. Nahum (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

"Belief in a Third Temple"

 * Third Temple is a misleading name not ony because this is a matter of belief, not of ashlars and pilasters, but because Herod's Temple is often called ''the Third Temple," especially by those (a minority opinion) who believe that te Second Temple was razed by Herod and replaced. Therefore, this article about a theological construct should be explicit in the title and make clear that this is an idea, not a building.AMuseo (talk) 11:17, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose because whether it is a "belief" or not, it is a notion in classical Judaism supported by parts of the Bible (Ezekiel). Likewise, "Heaven" and "Hell" are beliefs (no one has come back to report on their exactness) and articles about them are not titled Belief in heaven and hell or some such. IZAK (talk) 17:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Time for closure?
The RfC's have run for over a month, I think it's time we consider the conclusions. -- Avi (talk) 02:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

✅ Weaponbb7 (talk) 02:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Ezekiel and the Temple
"The Third Temple, also known as Ezekiel's Temple..." I think you'll find that Ezekiel's temple was the 2nd, the one completed in 515. PiCo (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

 * although the second temple did implement certain designs described by Ezekiel, the temple described by Ezekiel has not yet been built--Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (talk) 17:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

"The initial text discussing the Third Temple is written in the Book of Ezekiel chapter 40, where, on the day of Yom Kippur of the Hebrew calendar 3372, Ezekiel prophesies the third temple architecture as well as envisioning the permanent entrance of the God of Israel through the eastern gate of the third temple wall." This must be wrong. 3372 in Hebrew calendar is 388 BCE, and Babylonian captivity, where Ezekiel wrote his book was 597-538 BCE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.73.25.9 (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC) btw orthodox judaism believes the second temple, even though it incorporated some of the things from Ezekiel, the temple he mention is one and the same with the third temple to be built with the coming of messiah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.8.151.45 (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Rabbi Shlomo Goren section
The third paragraph deals with a "widely repeated story" of Rabbi Schlomo Goren's desire to see destruction of Muslim sights on the Temple Mount. All of the sources in the paragraph are dubious. The statements made are all hear-say. I am not saying anything is NPOV, it is just sloppy writting and unencyclopedic.

The last two paragraphs are tacked-on advertisements for a book and movie.

I propose throwing out the third and last two paragraphs, and either an overhaul or movement of the good information to another section. The very next section is "current rebuilding efforts." This would be a good place for the useful information contained in the Rabbi Shlomo Goren section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.95.171.19 (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

After no responses I went ahead and removed the third and final two sections. I still say the rest of the section needs to be reworked, but I'm not gonna do it at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.95.171.19 (talk) 22:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Christian opinions
I have to say, the layout of this section strikes me as bizarre--two divisions of Christianity that make up the overwhelming majority of believers (Orthodox plus Catholic) are listed second, and given as much discussion as one portion of Protestantism. The Orthodox and Catholic views are the earliest, and ought to be listed first, as the starting point. Everything else is listed in historical order. What's even more bizarre, though, is that Hal Lindsay, an author whose theology the great majority of Christians would consider false, if not heretical, gets a whole section, one that is nearly as long as the Catholic-Orthodox section! This should be re-balanced. InFairness (talk) 07:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC) Have added the views of two church fathers with references.Cpsoper (talk) 11:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia is notoriously known for being anti-Catholic and anti-Christian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CEB1:6500:5D4:C233:38C9:D02 (talk) 16:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Design detail
Would it be too lengthy to devote a bit of the article length to the specifics of architectural design described in chapters 40-47 of Ezekiel?--Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (talk) 18:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Herzl
Have inserted a short reference to Herzl and Alneuland. In retrospect it's better under conservative than orthodox Jewish opinion. Perhaps other editors will help clarify this.Cpsoper (talk) 18:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC) indefinitely agree, Herzl was definitely not an orthodox jew — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.8.151.45 (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed restructure
I'd like to discuss re-structuring this article, per the outline below. I think that it could be much tighter, and if required material can be spun out into other articles if required. - Aaron Brenneman (talk) 14:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

CURRENT OUTLINE 1 Prelude 2 Orthodox Judaism 2.1 General views 2.2 Role in prayer 2.3 Preservation of daily cycle 2.4 Preservation of rules of tumah 2.5 Attempts to re-establish a Jewish Presence on the Temple Mount 3 Role in Conservative Judaism 4 Role in Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism 5 Ancient attempts at rebuilding 5.1 Bar Kochba revolt 5.2 Julian 6 Medieval attempts at rebuilding 6.1 Sassanid vassal state 6.2 Muslim conquest of Syria 6.3 During the Mongol raids into Palestine 7 Modern rebuilding efforts 7.1 Organizations 7.2 Obstacles 7.3 Status of Temple Mount 8 Christian views 8.1 Protestant 8.1.1 Mainstream 8.1.2 Dispensationalist 8.1.3 Dispensational Evangelical 8.2 Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox 8.3 Hal Lindsey 8.4 Latter Day Saints 9 Muslim view 10 Bahá'í view 11 See also 12 Further reading 13 External links 14 Notes

PROPOSED OUTLINE 1 Lede 2 Orthodox Judaism 3 Conservative Judaism 4 Rebuilding attempts 4.1 Ancient 4.2 Medieval 4.3 Modern 5 Other religious views 5.1 Christian 5.2 Muslim 5.3 Other 6 References

Looks good to me. Would you still have the same subtitles as the current article? Also, what about having Orthodox, Conservative, and Reformed all under the same heading of "Views in Judaism," section 2? Joshuajohnson555 (talk) 04:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Furthermore,, the article looks like this:

 == Introduction == {{Incomplete|date=August 2011} } The initial text discussing the third temple is written in the book of Ezekiel chapter 40, where, on the day of Yom Kippur of the hebrew year 3372, Ezekiel prophecizes the third temple architecture as well as envisioning the permanent entrance of the God of Israel through the Eastern gate of the third temple wall.

=== Architecture === == In Jewish prayer ==

The third temple is also portrayed as a religious notion and desire in Judaism rooted and expressed in many of Judaism's prayers for the return and rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem that had once stood as the First and Second Temples that were destroyed by the ancient Babylonians and the Romans.

Since the destruction of the Second Temple in AD 70, religious Jews have expressed their desire to see the building of a Third Temple on the Temple Mount. Prayer for this is a formal part of the Jewish tradition of thrice daily Amidah prayer. Though it remains un-built, the notion of and desire for a Third Temple is sacred in Judaism, particularly Orthodox Judaism, and anticipated as a soon to be built place of worship. The prophets in the Tanakh called for its construction, to be fulfilled prior to or in tandem with the Messianic era.

The scenario of a rebuilding of the Third Temple also plays a major role with-in some interpretations of Christian Eschatology.

Architectural plans for the third Temple exist most notably in Chapters 40–47 of Ezekiel (Ezekiel's vision pre-dates the Second Temple) and some scholars entertain the notion that the Temple Scroll describes the third temple design as well.

Since a number of Jewish scholars have stated that the deadline for the arrival of the Jewish Messiah is the Jewish Year 6000 (2240 CE), this would also seem to be a deadline for beginning the construction of the Third Temple.

My question: should not the content under "In Jewish Prayer" be that of "Introduction." And "architecture" could be deleted as there is nothing regarding that so far. Joshuajohnson555 (talk) 04:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

All that seems reasonable. If there are not any objections, I'll write down the three sections into the one. - Aaron Brenneman (talk) 12:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Of (close to) first issue of priority should be temple detail and architecture--Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (talk) 18:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Establishing a Jewish presence
An anonymous editor has removed reference to the first publicised example of a photo of Jewish prayer on the mount from a reliable source, and suggests this is nothing to do with a third temple. This has everything to do with establishing a Jewish presence on the Mount, and the explicitly declared aspiration of the participants, in the accompanying article is to look to build a third temple.Cpsoper (talk) 23:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Rewriting of the lead section
The wp:Lead section of this article needs to be written, as it does not seem to be a summary of the article. Editor2020 03:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Third Jewish Temple
I'm trying to find the start date for construction of the Third Jewish Temple

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Third Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060615033158/http://archives.cnn.com:80/2000/WORLD/meast/09/28/jerusalem.violence.02/ to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/meast/09/28/jerusalem.violence.02/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Ezekiel's temple (#2)
I propose to remove the 'hard' link in the introduction between the Third Temple and Ezekiel's Temple as this hard link with Ezekiel's temple is not supported by the content of the article. Most of the projects and viewpoints in the detail of the article are not based on Ezekiel's temple. Clivemacd (talk) 16:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * References to 'Ezekiel's temple' removed from introduction; new article 'Ezekiel's temple' created and links added to this article. Clivemacd (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Third Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927090658/http://kadosh.co.il/mkdsh026.html to http://www.kadosh.co.il/mkdsh026.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/181344
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080407061730/http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/docs/Grossman-Niddah.pdf to http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/docs/Grossman-Niddah.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090320161047/http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/docs/Berkowitz-Niddah.pdf to http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/docs/Berkowitz-Niddah.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080407061721/http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/docs/Reisner-Niddah.pdf to http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/docs/Reisner-Niddah.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051020130904/http://www.gibsoncondo.com/~david/convert/history.html to http://www.gibsoncondo.com/~david/convert/history.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wesley-fellowship.org.uk/Zionist_Hymn.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110501032326/http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Jerusalem_New_Testament.pdf to http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Jerusalem_New_Testament.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 December 2018
Please change the Introduction, rather the first 2 words (first sentence) of this article! Do it for mankind.

Be blessed 93 Meerschaumpijp (talk) 20:12, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:18, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Change 'The House, the Holy, the Third' to 'The House of the Sanctuary, the Third'
The literal English translation (The House, the Holy, the Third) given in the first sentence of the article for the Hebrew name for the third temple (Beit haMikdash haShlishi) does not seem to be accurate. 'The House, the Holy, the Third' seems to assume that haMikdash is an adjective meaning 'holy' (like the Hebrew word kadosh), whereas it is in fact a noun meaning 'holy place, sanctuary, temple' (see e.g. http://www.morfix.co.il/en/ or any ancient or modern Hebrew reference work). Grammatically speaking, haMikdash is in a construct relationship (smichut) with Beit, making a single phrase 'the house of the sanctuary' A more accurate literal translation would be 'The House of the Sanctuary, the Third'. Cianpower (talk) 13:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 October 2019
Please remove the words "soon-to-be built" as this is not the position of Judaism, which says only that the Third Temple will be rebuilt when the Messiah is imminent. Importantly the Temple will not be rebuilt by humans. There are a number of key factors which are part of this. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/267114 CelebrateIsrael (talk) 16:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Add to Muslim Views: The Third Temple is Al-Aqsa
I would like for it to be added to the "Muslim Views" that we're already in the Third Temple period since the conquest of Umar ibn al-Khattab. Muslims believe that Masjid al-Aqsa itself is the Third Temple. To Muslims, the Jews no longer believe since they rejected the last two prophets, Jesus and Muhammad, and the Muslims carry the final message and religion of God, a continuation of the same religion of the previous prophets. Now the Jews come and wail at the wall and the Muslims come and celebrate.

I would also like to add that "temple denial" is a fringe opinion and in no way a mainstream Muslim opinion, neither is it remotely scholarly. It's just an emotional reaction to the current politics. Muslims always believed in the First and Second Temple Period and that the prophets who built them were upon the same, pure faith as them. DivineReality (talk) 20:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 May 2020
Summarize the "Christian views" section, as it contains excessive exegetical interpretations. You can keep the ideas in there, just make it less of a headache to read through. IDeagle94 (talk) 01:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Elizium23 (talk) 01:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 April 2021
The first sentence in the Latter-Day Saints section is wrong. They believe the 3rd temple must be built before the 2nd coming of Christ. The movement's founder, Joseph Smith, said, "Judah must return, Jerusalem must be rebuilt, and the temple, and water come out from under the temple, and the waters of the Dead Sea be healed. It will take some time to rebuild the walls of the city and the temple, &c.; and all this must be done before the Son of Man will make His appearance." (as recorded in Joseph Fielding Smith's book, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.286)

Please make the correction. Thank you. Richwilkinson (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, and thank you very much!  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 16:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

RE: the link to Temple Denial
The phrase that links to the article on Temple Denial is phrased thus: "...deny any association with the Mount to the former Jewish Temples which stood at the site." I suggest that better English grammar would be: "...deny any association of the Mount with the former Jewish Temples which stood at the site."Cdg1072 (talk) 19:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Minor error intro
Intro - Para 1: "Beit haMikdash haShlishi, lit. 'The House, the Holy, the Third'" Translation error. Hebrew compounds words in a similar way as French does - "The ex of wy of zed" - which is equal to English "The zeddish wy-ex." It's like translating "Jus de Pommes/מיץ תפוחים" as "juice, apples" - which is just wrong; they just call it apple juice.

TL;DR the translation of it is literally "The Third Temple." Please fix it. Shibolet Nehrd (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * In all Semitic languages it translates to the Third Holy House. In Google translate it The House The Holy The Third. BeitAlMikdas (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

I don't see how google translate is the best source. It deals mainly with modern Hebrew, and even then it hardly knows how to conjugate verbs. On an unrelated note, I think the translation "The Third Holy House" is pretty good. I'd much rather to see that there instead. Shibolet Nehrd (talk) 03:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 August 2022
At the end of Dispensational Evangelical: [This section does not cite any sources] : Addition:

According to The End Times, The Book of Revelation by British author Paul Backholer, the Bible proclaims the Third Temple will be significantly damaged in a showdown with the Antichrist. [cite: https://byfaith.org/2022/07/24/a-third-temple-in-jerusalem-will-be-built/ ] Evangelicals disagree on the specific timeline and interpretations. Dr Michael P. Baston (talk) 09:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. SWinxy (talk) 23:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 September 2022
in ==Attempts at rebuilding==, in ===Julian===, in the image caption that reads "Subterranean fires defeat Julian's effort to rebuilt the temple, illustration by James Dabney, 1877" change 'rebuilt' to 'rebuild' Martibttbtt (talk) 10:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ EnIRtpf09b chat with me 11:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Third Temple on Temple Mount
Among religious Jews, the anticipation of an ultimate future project centred around building the Third Temple at the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem has been a running theme that, in Israel, is also espoused as an ideological motive.

Maybe this should read "Among some religious Jews". I'm a religious Jew and I don't have any desire to see this built on the Temple Mount. Also, "centered" is misspelled in this sentence (..."ultimate future project centred around"). 24.51.192.49 (talk) 15:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Dating nomenclature
The holiest structure in Christianity and Judaism is discussed and yet we see CE and bce versus the more accurate and more appropriate AD and BC. 2600:6C5E:4000:3F5C:C0:23E:641A:94B8 (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

link outside text
i've never seen this on any other article. wouldn't it make more sense to have the link to "status of jerusalem" attached to "both sides have asserted it as their capital city"? 2604:3D09:6A7F:82C0:F9E5:342E:D3FF:1100 (talk) 17:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Isn’t it technically a 4th temple?
Solomon built over a pre-existing temple sight as is recorded in scripture, so under a technicality the 3rd temple was already built and destroyed… can people do math? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:59C8:31B3:F500:6153:46DC:A185:460B (talk) 08:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Third Temple


text:
William Kerr Fraser

Sir William Kerr Fraser (18 March 1929 – 13 September 2018) was a British civil servant, who served as Permanent Secretary at the Scottish Office, and as Principal and later Chancellor of the University of Glasgow.

Early life
William Kerr Fraser was educated at Eastwood High School in Glasgow. He studied at the University of Glasgow (M.A., LL.B.), where he was President of the Students' Representative Council from 1951–52.

Civil Service
He joined the Scottish Home Department, part of the Civil Service, in 1953, becoming Private Secretary to Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State in 1959, and to the Secretary of State in 1966. In 1967, he became Assistant Secretary at the Regional Development Division, and in 1971 became Under-Secretary at the Scottish Home and Health Department. In 1975, he became Deputy Secretary, and in 1978 Permanent Secretary at the Scottish Office, serving until 1988. He was appointed a Companion of the Order of the Bath (CB) in 1978, and created a Knight Commander of the order (KCB) in 1979 and a Knight Grand Cross of the order (GCB) in 1984.

University of Glasgow
Sir William became Principal and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Glasgow in 1988 and served in these posts until 1995. In 1996, he was elected Chancellor of the University. He stood down from this role in 2006 and was succeeded by Professor Sir Kenneth Calman. The HUB Building at the University of Glasgow was refurbished as a student services centre and named the Fraser Building in his honour. He was awarded an honorary LL.D. by the University in 1982.

Personal life
In 1956, Fraser married Marion Forbes, a Past President of the Queen Margaret Union, then the women's union of the University of Glasgow. They had three sons and one daughter, and several grandchildren – one of whom is himself a former President of the Queen Margaret Union, Colum Fraser.

Sir William served as Governor of the Caledonian Research Foundation from 1990–99 and Chairman of the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland from 1995–2000. He was appointed a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1985, and an honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1992, and of the Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama in 1995. He received honorary degrees (LL.D.) from the Universities of Glasgow (1982), Strathclyde (1991) and Aberdeen (1993), and a Doctorate honoris causa from Edinburgh (1995).

title: William Kerr Fraser


text:
F5, Inc.

F5, Inc. is an American technology company specializing in application security, multi-cloud management, online fraud prevention, application delivery networking (ADN), application availability & performance, network security, and access & authorization.

F5 is headquartered in Seattle, Washington in F5 Tower, with an additional 75 offices in 43 countries focusing on account management, global services support, product development, manufacturing, software engineering, and administrative jobs. Notable office locations include Spokane, Washington; New York, New York; Boulder, Colorado; London, England; San Jose, California; and San Francisco, California.

F5's originally offered application delivery controller (ADC) technology, but expanded into application layer, automation, multi-cloud, and security services. As ransomware, data leaks, DDoS, and other attacks on businesses of all sizes are arising, companies such as F5 have continued to reinvent themselves. While the majority of F5's revenue continues to be attributed to its hardware products such as the BIG-IP iSeries systems, the company has begun to offer additional modules on their proprietary operating system, TMOS (Traffic Management Operating System.) These modules are listed below and include, but are not limited to, Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Advanced Web Application Firewall (AWAF), DNS (previously named GTM), and Access Policy Manager (APM). These offer organizations running the BIG-IP the ability to deploy load balancing, Layer 7 application firewalls, single sign-on (for Azure AD, Active Directory, LDAP, and Okta), as well as enterprise-level VPNs. While the BIG-IP was traditionally a hardware product, F5 now offers it as a virtual machine, which they have branded as the BIG-IP Virtual Edition. The BIG-IP Virtual Edition is cloud agnostic and can be deployed on-premises in a public and/or hybrid cloud environment.

F5's customers include Bank of America, Microsoft, Oracle, Alaska Airlines, Tesla, and Meta.

Corporate history
F5, Inc., originally named "F5 Labs" and formerly branded "F5 Networks, Inc." was established in 1996. Currently, the company's public-facing branding generally presents the company as just "F5."

In 1997, F5 launched its first product, a load balancer called BIG-IP. BIG-IP served the purpose of reallocating server traffic away from overloaded servers. In June 1999, the company had its initial public offering and was listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange with the symbol FFIV.

In 2017, François Locoh-Donou replaced John McAdam as president and CEO. Later in 2017, F5 launched a dedicated site and organization focused on gathering global threat intelligence data, analyzing application threats, and publishing related findings, dubbed "F5 Labs" in a nod to the company's history. The team continues to research application threats and publish findings every week. On May 3, 2017, F5 announced that it would move from its longtime headquarters on the waterfront near Seattle Center to a downtown Seattle skyscraper that will be called F5 Tower. The move occurred in early 2019.

F5 employees include Dahl-Nygaard laureate Gilad Bracha; Google click fraud czar Shuman Ghosemajumder; and Defense.Net founder Barrett Lyon.

48 of the Fortune 50 companies use F5 for load balancing, Layer 7 application security, fraud prevention, and API management.

F5 BIG-IP
F5's BIG-IP product family comprises hardware, modularized software, and virtual appliances that run the F5 TMOS operating system. Depending on the appliance selected, one or more BIG-IP product modules can be added.

In 1997, the company introduced its flagship product, BIG-IP.

BIG-IP History
On September 7, 2004, F5 Networks released version 9.0 of the BIG-IP software in addition to appliances to run the software. Version 9.0 also marked the introduction of the company's TMOS architecture, with enhancements including:

In late 2021, F5 introduced the next generation of their BIG-IP hardware platforms, the rSeries and VELOS chassis platform. These next-generation systems will replace the previous generation iSeries and VIPRION chassis system.
 * Moved from BSD to Linux to handle system management functions (disks, logging, bootup, console access, etc.)
 * Creation of a Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to directly talk to the networking hardware and handle all network activities.
 * Creation of the standard full-proxy mode, which fully terminates network connections at the BIG-IP and establishes new connections between the BIG-IP and the member servers in a pool. This allows for optimum TCP stacks on both sides as well as the complete ability to modify traffic in either direction.

F5 NGINX
As a part of the NGINX, Inc. acquisition in 2019, F5 offers a premium, enterprise-level version of NGINX with advanced features, multiple support SLAs, and regular software updates.

F5 Distributed Cloud Services
During F5 Agility 2022, F5 announced a new product offering being built on the platforms of BIG-IP, Shape Security, and Volterra. Announced during F5 Agility 2022, this suite is built upon the foundation of F5's BIG-IP, Shape Security, and Volterra platforms. The primary offering in this suite is the SaaS-based Web Application and API Protection (WAAP). F5 Distributed Cloud Services enable organizations to deploy, secure, and manage their applications across various environments, including data centers, multi-cloud setups, and the network or enterprise edge.

The suite includes a range of products tailored to address specific security and networking needs, such as Distributed Cloud DDoS Mitigation Service, Web Application Firewall (WAF), Bot Defense, API Security, and Client-Side Defense.

In addition to these security-focused products, F5 Distributed Cloud Services also encompass various networking and application management, including Aggregator Management, Network Connect, App Connect, App Stack, DNS services, Content Delivery Network (CDN), and Synthetic Monitoring.

uRoam, Inc.
F5 acquired uRoam, Inc. in 2003 for a total cash deal size of $25 million. The strategic intent behind F5 Networks' acquisition of uRoam was to diversify its product offerings beyond its core application delivery and security services. This move aimed to address the growing demand for secure remote access to corporate networks and applications, aligning with industry trends.

MagniFire Websystems, Inc.
F5 acquired MagniFire Websystems in 2004 for a total cash deal size of $29 million. This acquisition allowed F5 to enter the web application security space within the BIG-IP platform. MagniFire Websystems products were sold independently when the deal first closed, then were quickly bundled into the BIG-IP product group.

Swan Labs Corporation
In September 2005, F5 announced they had acquired Swan Labs for a total of $43 million to incorporate WAN optimization and application acceleration technology into the BIG-IP platform, specifically to improve their load balancing offering.

Traffix Systems, Inc.
In 2005, F5 Networks, Inc. at the time, now F5, Inc., announced it has acquired Traffix Systems for a total value of $135 million. Traffix Systems product was integrated within the F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) product line.

Acopia Networks, Inc.
In August 2007, F5, Inc., at the time, F5 Networks, Inc., announced they acquired Acopia Networks, Inc. to add file-area networking to the F5 BIG-IP application-delivery product line, also known as the Local Traffic Manager (LTM) module on the BIG-IP platforms. The deal was valued at $210 million.

Defense.Net, Inc.
In May 2014, F5, Inc., at the time, F5 Networks, Inc., announced they acquired Defense.Net, Inc., a company offering cloud-based DDoS mitigation services. The Defense.Net product would later become F5 Silverline. As of December 2022, the Silverline brand was retired and the managed service offerings Silverline offered were merged into the F5 Distributed Cloud Services product portfolio.

NGINX, Inc.
In March 2019, F5 acquired NGINX, Inc., the company responsible for widely used open-source web server software, for $670 million.

Shape Security, Inc.
In January 2020, F5 acquired Shape Security, Inc., an artificial intelligence-based bot detection company, for $1 billion. It also sells products to protect applications against fraud.

Volterra, Inc.
In January 2021, F5 acquired Volterra, Inc., an edge networking company, for $500 million. It sells SaaS security services. The previous Volterra-branded products are now included in F5 Distributed Cloud Services.

Threat Stack, Inc.
In October 2021, F5 acquired Threat Stack, Inc., a Boston cloud computing security startup company for a reported $68 million. As of December 15, 2022, the previous Threat Stack offering has been rolled into the F5 Distributed Cloud platform.

Lilac Cloud, Inc.
In January 2023, F5 announced they had entered into an agreement to purchase Lilac Cloud, an application services delivery provider. Lilac Cloud, based in Cupertino, California, was F5's CDN provider for their Distributed Cloud Services. The entire Lilac Cloud offering will be rolled into the overall F5 Distributed Cloud Services product line.

Suborbital Software Systems, Inc.
In July 2023, Suborbital Software Systems, a technology startup building cloud-native platforms on WebAssembly, announced they had been acquired by F5, Inc. The details of this acquisition were not disclosed due to the small nature of Suborbital's operations. The entire Suborbital product will be used within the F5 Distributed Cloud Services product line.

Wib Security, Inc.
In February 2024 at AppWorld, F5's premier application security and delivery conference, in San Jose, California, F5 announced they acquired Wib, an API security company based in Tel Aviv, Israel, focused on vulnerability detection and observability in application development. The financial details of the Wib acquisition was not disclosed. The Wib API intellectual property is being added to the F5 Distributed Cloud Services product line.

Heyhack
In March 2024, F5 announced they acquired Heyhack ApS, a Denmark-based and operated security penetration SaaS company. The financial details of this acquisition were not disclosed. F5 announced Heyhack’s intellectual property would be rolled into the F5 Distributed Cloud Services platform. Automated security reconnaissance and penetration testing solution will be incorporated into F5 Distributed Cloud Services.

title: F5, Inc.


text:
Talk:Edson Raff

Where was Edson?
He led the 509th into Africa in late 1942. He shows up again landing at Utah via LCT in 1944. His book was published in 1944, so perhaps he was back in the states, or in England, training more paratroopers? Anybody read his book? It may say in there. Beanbatch 20:29, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Where was he from '42 to '44?
 * Why didn't he jump into Normandy?
 * Apparently, he commanded the 509th until at least Christmas of 1942, as he selected the group that set out to destroy the railroad bridge at El Djem, Tunisia. Still leaves 18 months. According to one veteran interview, Raff may have gotten in some trouble over his book, as he may not have requested permission to publish it. --Habap 13:56, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * OK, I found out more by re-reading some of Clay Blair's Ridgway's Paratroopers, in particular, what I have posted on the User:Habap/Raff user sub-page. So, he was on Bradley's staff, then was 'forced' upon Ridgway who assigned him to lead the 325's armored sea-landing force (21 tanks and 90 gliderists) on D-Day. No exact dates for his assignment to Bradley's staff or to the 82nd. --Habap 15:38, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

 * According to Blair's book Ridgway's Paratroopers Raff was sent back to the states in 1943 from Africa because Ridgway disliked him (p. 79). Raff returned to CONUS for a job at the Airborne Training Center along with some other officers who had been wounded. Raff finagled his way to England on the 82d Airborne advance team and then onto Bradley's staff and then 'forced' back on Ridgway as discussed above who put him in charge of 'Raff Force'. Raff was then made temporary chief of staff of the 82d and then fired as COS and made commander of the 507th PIR (p. 336-338). The 507th was transferred to the 17th Airborne Division (along with Raff) after the 82d was withdrawn from Normandy (p. 356). Raff led the 507th PIR as part of the 17th ABD for the rest of the war. There is a picture of him in Blair's book between pgs 376 and 377. BBeagle 01:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

 * While in Normandy this spring, our guide speculated that Bradley may have selected Raff for that task, the size of which would merit only a Captain in command, because of his experience and rank, which would allow him more freedom and initiative than afforded a less-experienced or lower-ranking officer (whose troops could have been 'diverted' by any regimental commander). --Habap (talk) 20:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

 * Further re-reading of Blair's Ridgway's Paratroopers (page 507) revealed that Raff served as Chief of Staff of the 82nd Airborne Division (United States) for a few days in between the injury of Ralph P. "Doc" Eaton on the 6th and his appointment as CO of the 507th on 15 June. Eaton must have returned to the post when Raff left. --Habap (talk) 15:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Web-surfing, I found two more sources of info on Raff in Africa. He commanded a combined-arms task force in central Tunisia from 15 Nov 1942 to 19 Jan 1943 that was the focus of a paper was presented to the Army War College (I believe the author is LTC Linwood W. Billings, but it is on the web with the permission of David D. Evans) on the "Tunisian Task Force".
 * Although Colonel Raff's command was officially known as the Tunisian Task Force, it was more often referred to as the "Raff Force" by the troops in that area of North Africa. United States Military Academy, A Military History of World War II With Atlas, Volume II, Operation in the Mediterranean and Pacific Theaters, p. 49. Tunisian Task Force
 * That site also hosts the journal of the 3rd Battalion, 26th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, which has various details on Raff's actions. --Habap (talk) 19:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Little Flower
Interestingly, Raff's sister the nun, didn't tell him that the Little Flower wasn't Jesus. In fact, the Little Flower of Jesus was from Calvados, Basse-Normandie, near where Raff would fight with the 325th. --Habap 06:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Webster reference
As I was re-reading David Kenyon Webster's Parachute Infantry, I realized the book he was reading on the way to the Market Garden drop was Raff's book. Webster found it boring.... --Habap (talk) 20:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Raff's family history
In searching on Amazon for more sources that mention Raff, I came across Hearst Over Hollywood by Louis Pizzitola, in which Colonel Raff is among those the author thanks in the acknowledgements. On page 37, Pizzitola identifies L. Edson Raff as a movie cameraman taking a shot from the rear of William Randoph Hearst's train speeding back (Washington to New York) from the William McKinley inauguration in 1901. The young Mr. Raff is identified as "the stepson of Norman Raff of Raff and Gammon, film manufacturers for Thomas Edison." I'm decided unsure of the relationship between the two, but since this is the only mention of a Raff in the book and Pizzitola thanks COL Raff, I am going to guess that there's a good chance this was his father or uncle. --Habap (talk) 15:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Promotion to Colonel in NY Times
Go figure! "EDSON RAFF NOW COLONEL; Man Who Trained U.S. Parachute Troops for Africa Promoted", December 3, 1942, Thursday, Page 12, 133 words. I'll have to find that one. --Habap (talk) 15:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Edson Raff


text:
User talk:Lordbalfour

Welcome
Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:Lordbalfour


text:
User talk:Earthlingdave

Hi Dave, your article The Kerman is being schduled for demolition - if you could provide some sources, or references, it would make it easier to keep, if, indeed, it is verifiable! Thanks, Trollderella 20:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Hey there. I don't have any source material. My friends and I, while in the Poconos, overheard someone talking about The Kerman. It seemed to be well known in the area and we thought it deserved a posting. Thanks.

Image tagging for Image:Creakytom.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Creakytom.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphan Feast
The article was deleted after being discussed on the articles for deletion page see Articles for deletion/Orphan Feast. Carlossuarez46 01:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tweed poster.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tweed poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Grimm: Ride of the Perambulator

A tag has been placed on Grimm: Ride of the Perambulator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zachlipton (talk) 20:01, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

File:GrimmShadow.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GrimmShadow.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Earthlingdave


text:
Sestra (Moscow Oblast)

The Sestra (Сестра́) is a river in Moscow Oblast, Russia. It is a left tributary of the Dubna (Volga basin). Its source is the Senezh Lake. The length of the river is 138 km. The area of its basin is 2,680 km2. The river freezes in November to early January and stays under the ice until late March or April. Its main tributary is the Yakhroma. The town of Klin is located on the Sestra.

title: Sestra (Moscow Oblast)


text:
Flood (The Young Ones)

"Flood" is the sixth episode of British sitcom The Young Ones. It was written by Ben Elton, Rik Mayall and Lise Mayer, and directed by Paul Jackson. It was first aired on BBC2 on 14 December 1982 and was the final episode of the first series.

This episode was the only one of the dozen made not to feature a band performing mid-show; the lion-tamer provided the "cabaret" instead.

Plot
With none of the quartet noticing a medieval execution in their back garden, there is initial tranquility in the house, with Neil randomly hitting himself in the face with a frying pan, and Vyvyan reading one of Rick's "SS Death Camp Battalion go to Monte Cassino for the Massacre" war comics, leading to an argument with Rick over the comic's content. Before Neil prepares to go on a shopping trip for "everything except Green Globules and Super Mousse", Vyvyan mentions that he had concocted a 'homicidal axe-wielding maniac' potion disguised in a Coca-Cola can, that transforms the drinker into said person, under the guise of a "cure for not being a homicidal axe-wielding maniac", to which Vyvyan mentions the enormous potential market for such an invention.

Torrential rain soon traps everyone in the house and a game of hide and seek gets underway to pass the time. The house takes on a Narnia-esque feel, with a lion tamer in Mike's bedroom and Vyvyan finding a witch in a sleigh lurking in a new world at the back of the wardrobe where he was hiding. But all that - plus the sharks at the window and the arson attack on Rick's bedroom caused by Vyvyan - becomes irrelevant as Mr. Balowski arrives, unwittingly drinks Vyvyan's potion, and goes on the hunt. As Mike, Rick and Vyvyan prepare to kill Neil for food with an electric hedge trimmer, Mr. Balowski breaks down the door to Neil's room with an axe, leading to the group trying to escape him. After tricking Mr. Balowski into entering Mike's room, which was being rented out to Bobby the Lion Tamer and his man-eating lions, (Bobby coincidentally was Robert Raven from Gerry Cottles Circus), the group notice the floodwaters are subsiding. The episode ends by showing Vyvyan's hamster, SPG, floating on a discarded McEwan's Export can on the floodwaters, showing he had survived Vyvyan's angry outburst which led to him throwing him outside. A rainbow can be seen on the horizon and SPG is carrying an olive branch in his mouth.

Characters
As with all episodes of The Young Ones, the main four characters were student housemates Mike (Christopher Ryan); Vyvyan (Adrian Edmondson); Rick (Rik Mayall) and Neil (Nigel Planer). The episode also features their landlord Jerzei Balowski (Alexei Sayle), a character who was appearing for the second time during the first series, and would appear once more in total.

The cat puppet in this episode was voiced by writer Ben Elton.

title: Flood (The Young Ones)


text:
Talk:Kenan & Kel

charlie
hi I just want to know where can I watch the new Good Burger on 97.64.118.99 (talk) 09:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Kenan & Kel


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon theme music

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus between keeping and merging. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 00:15, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Pokémon theme music
The "Pokémon theme music" article is shorter than the smaller of stubs and explains a term not worth an own article in an encyplopedia. The content is made by geussing wiki markup and not previewing. See Anti-pokemon also. --Shreddy 20:34, 29 August 2005 (UTC) Merge / redirect. --Lockley 23:24, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. This might also be a possible merge candidate if we have an article on Pokemon music in general (including movie soundtracks, etc.) Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  17:01, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand. Agreed; this article could be expanded into a full-fledged article discussing Pokémon music. There are several Pokémon theme songs in multiple languages, and I feel that the subject scope of Pokémon music is wide enough to warrant it's own article rather than another section in the Pokémon article.
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now.  No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 09:22, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, Merge, or Redirect can see how this could easily be a full article - however its probably better merged someplace. Ryan Norton T 09:40, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Pokémon (anime) or Pokémon and delete. --GraemeL (talk) 13:21, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Merge and cleanup. Hipocrite - « Talk » 13:44, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with and redirect to Pokémon (anime). This is a fine idea (one I've had in the past) but I really, really doubt it merits its own article. Maybe if they released them on a music CD or something. Although knowing Nintendo's overwhoring of the license they probably have. GarrettTalk 15:43, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to the TV show article. Gazpacho 16:36, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete PokeCruft if not deleted Merge --JAranda | yeah 20:14, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Garrett... no reason this merit's its own article.--Isotope23 20:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Pokémon (anime) which discusses the show's music more extensively than this article. --Metropolitan90 03:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand - plenty of scope to do so as Starbling pointed out. --Cel e stianpower hablamé 12:29, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Brian Ray

Brian Thomas Ray is an American musician best known as a guitarist, bassist, backing vocalist with Paul McCartney's touring band since 2002 and formerly as a musical director and guitarist for Etta James. Ray has performed with numerous other artists and leads his own band, The Bayonets.

Early life
Brian Ray grew up in Southern California. His first musical performances were in front of his peers – at show and tell – setting his own lyrics to the tune of old folk songs.

By the age of nine, he began playing the guitar. His elder sister, Jean (of folk duo Jim and Jean) spurred his interest in rock music through her record collection. Jean invited Brian to play at the LA Troubadour when he was 15 years old. She was "probably the most important and influential person" in Ray's early life.

Career
In 1973, shortly after graduating from high school, Ray began his musical career as part of Bobby Pickett and the Crypt Kicker Five, playing "Monster Mash" at a fundraising benefit hosted by and for Phil Kaufman. Kaufman took Ray in and would later introduce him to singer Etta James at a rehearsal for the world-famous Troubadour, just as James was on the brink of a career comeback. That brief introduction would eventually lead to Ray's 14-year career as Etta James' musical director and guitarist.

While working for Etta James, Ray also shared stages with musicians such as Keith Richards, Santana, Joe Cocker, Bonnie Raitt, John Lee Hooker, and Bo Diddley. At this time he also began focusing more on songwriting. Ray spent the late 1980s collaborating with musicians such as Peter Frampton, Rita Coolidge, Nicolette Larson, Michael Steele (of The Bangles), and Steve LeGassick, who became a songwriting partner for 13 years. It was this songwriting partnership with LeGassick that would create the 1987 Smokey Robinson award-winning hit "One Heartbeat", which has received over 2,000,000 airplays.

Prior to working with Paul McCartney in 2002, Ray was working on tour in France with two different French artists, Mylène Farmer and Johnny Hallyday. Abe Laboriel Jr., a drummer who had previously worked with Brian Ray, mentioned that Paul McCartney was in search of a guitarist who could switch between guitar and bass guitar (for songs on which McCartney plays piano or guitar). After meeting with McCartney's producer for Driving Rain, David Kahne, Ray joined Paul McCartney for the pre-game performance of "Freedom" at the NFL's Super Bowl XXXVI in 2002.

Ray joined the rest of Paul McCartney's band for the Driving Rain tour in promotion of the album. As of then, he has appeared on McCartney's solo albums, such as Back in the World, Back in the U.S., Memory Almost Full, New and Egypt Station as well as three concert DVDs: Paul McCartney in Red Square, The Space Within US, and Good Evening New York City.

In addition to being a session musician, Brian Ray has also contributed to film scores such as the soundtrack to the film Heartbreakers in 1984. In 2002, Ray and Abe Laboriel Jr. composed the score for the independent film The Failures. In 2011, Ray joined with Oliver Leiber to form The Bayonets.

Solo career
After decades of performing, writing, and recording with musical artists, Brian Ray released his first solo album, Mondo Magneto, on October 16, 2006, through his record label Whooray Records.

"People have always asked me when I was going to do my own thing", Ray said, "I guess I was just busy."

Musicians on Mondo Magneto include Scott Shriner from Weezer, Davey Faragher from Elvis Costello's band, as well as Abe Laboriel, Jr., Wix Wickens, and Rusty Anderson from Paul McCartney's band.

When Ray asked the blues singer and his former boss Etta James if she would sing with him on the album her answer was simple, and immediate – "I'll do anything for Brian."

Mondo Magneto's record release party was held at The Mint in Los Angeles, California, on January 21, 2006. Ray's live band, Black Unicorn, includes musicians Peter Thorn on guitar, John Button on bass, and Matt Laug on drums. The band performs their music in Los Angeles clubs, such as The Viper Room and The Mint.

In 2008, Larry Graves and Brian Ray made a video for Ray's song "Coming Up Roses".

In 2010, Ray released a second album, entitled This Way Up.

title: Brian Ray


text:
User talk:Martinitolove

Image tagging for Image:Porcupine.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Porcupine.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Birdie.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Birdie.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Doom-Control.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Doom-Control.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Marvel-Zone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Marvel-Zone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Excelsior Theatre.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Excelsior Theatre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maximum-Plumage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maximum-Plumage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Protection-Racket.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Protection-Racket.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Deathlock-Solution.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Deathlock-Solution.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heroes-Return.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Heroes-Return.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Merciless-is-the-Mongrel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Merciless-is-the-Mongrel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MMysterio.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MMysterio.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spidey-and-Morbius.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Spidey-and-Morbius.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Strange Heads.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Strange Heads.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Path-of-Vengeance.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Path-of-Vengeance.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ravages-of-Apocalypse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ravages-of-Apocalypse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Prospekt Nauki.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Prospekt Nauki.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Ad_for_Simpsons_1959.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ad_for_Simpsons_1959.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Done!

File:Max_Hoff_(artist).jpg
I have tagged File:Max_Hoff_(artist).jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Done!

title: User talk:Martinitolove


text: User talk:81.134.100.232

title: User talk:81.134.100.232


text:
Pharmacode

Pharmacode, also known as Pharmaceutical Binary Code, is a barcode standard, used in the pharmaceutical industry as a packing control system. It is designed to be readable despite printing errors. It can be printed in multiple colors as a check to ensure that the remainder of the packaging (which the pharmaceutical company must print to protect itself from legal liability) is correctly printed. This barcode is also known as Laetuscode.

For best practice (better security), the code should always contain at least three bars and should always be a combination of both thick and thin bars, (all thick bars or all thin bars do not represent a secure code).

Encoding
Pharmacode can represent only a single integer from 3 to 131070. Unlike other commonly used one-dimensional barcode schemes, pharmacode does not store the data in a form corresponding to the human-readable digits; the number is encoded in binary, rather than decimal. Pharmacode is read from right to left, also in left to right (if omnidirectional scanner): with $$n$$ as the bar position starting at 0 on the right, each narrow bar adds $$2^n$$ to the value and each wide bar adds $$2\times 2^n$$. The minimum barcode is 2 bars and the maximum 16, so the smallest number that could be encoded is 3 (2 narrow bars) and the biggest is 131070 (16 wide bars). It represents colors which are on the label.

title: Pharmacode


text:
Jayawijaya Mountains

The Jayawijaya Mountains, formerly known as the Orange Range, are the eastern mountain range of the Maoke Mountains in the central highlands region of the Indonesian part of New Guinea. The range extends for 370 km east of the Sudirman Range to the Star Mountains. Its highest point is Puncak Mandala at 4760 m. The Baliem River has its source in the range.

Inhabitants of the range include the Ketengban.

Jayawijaya Mountains Wildlife Refuge, also known as Pegunungan Jayawijaya Wildlife Refuge, covers part of the range.

The range's Eternity Glaciers are projected to vanish by the year 2026, due both to climate change and strong El Niño weather patterns. The glaciers' depth has declined from 32 m in 2010 to 8 m in 2021.

title: Jayawijaya Mountains