text: Talk:1949–50 NHL season

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:1949–50 NHL season


text:
International Day of the Disappeared

The International Day of the Disappeared, on August 30 of each year, is a day created to draw attention to the fate of individuals imprisoned at places and under poor conditions unknown to their relatives and/or legal representatives. The impulse for the day came from the Latin American Federation of Associations for Relatives of Detained-Disappeared (Federación Latinoamericana de Asociaciones de Familiares de Detenidos-Desaparecidos, or FEDEFAM), a non-governmental organization founded in 1981 in Costa Rica as an association of local and regional groups actively working against secret imprisonment, forced disappearances and abduction in a number of Latin-American countries.

Work on secret imprisonment is an important part of the activities for a number of international bodies and organizations in the fields of human rights activism and humanitarian aid, including for example Amnesty International (AI), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The International Day of the Disappeared is an opportunity to highlight these institutions' work, increase public awareness, and to call for donations and volunteers.

Of those agencies, the ICRC has additional privileges due to its special status as a non-governmental sovereign entity and its strict policy of neutrality. In some cases, the ICRC is the only institution granted access to specific groups of prisoners, thereby enabling a minimum level of contact and inspection of their treatment. For affected families, messages transmitted by the ICRC are often the only hint about the fate of these prisoners.

Visiting those detained in relation to conflicts and enabling them to restore and maintain contact with their families, is a very important part of the ICRC's mandate. But the definition of the Missing or the Disappeared goes far beyond the victims of enforced disappearance. It includes all those whose families have lost contact as the result of conflicts, natural disasters or other tragedies.

These missing may be detained, stranded in foreign countries, hospitalized or dead. Through its tracing services and working with the 189 national Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies around the world, the ICRC seeks to obtain information about their fate on behalf of their families. It reminds governments and other groups of their obligations to respect the families' right to know the fate of their loved ones. It also works with families of the missing to help them address their particular psychological, social legal and financial needs.

Imprisonment under secret or uncertain circumstances is a grave violation of some conceptions of human rights as well as, in the case of an armed conflict, of International Humanitarian Law. The General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a Declaration on the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance as resolution 47/133 on December 18, 1992. It is estimated that secret imprisonment is practiced in about 30 countries. The OHCHR Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances has registered about 46,000 cases of people who disappeared under unknown circumstances.

On August 30, 2007, hundreds of Philippine relatives and supporters of desaparecidos, mostly activists, missing after being abducted or killed by Philippine security forces protested against the government to mark International Day of the Disappeared. Edita Burgos remembered her missing son, Jonas, a member of the Peasants' Movement of the Philippines.

On August 30, 2008, the International Coalition against Enforced Disappearances, which gathers family member organizations and human rights organizations from around the world, joined hands for a global campaign event to promote the ratification of the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.

title: International Day of the Disappeared


text: Talk:1948–49 NHL season

title: Talk:1948–49 NHL season


text: Talk:1950–51 NHL season

title: Talk:1950–51 NHL season


text:
Abba P. Lerner

Abraham "Abba" Ptachya Lerner (also Abba Psachia Lerner; 28 October 1903 – 27 October 1982) was a Russian-born American-British economist.

Biography
Born in Novoselytsia, Bessarabia, Russian Empire, Lerner grew up in a Jewish family, which emigrated to Great Britain when Lerner was three years old. Lerner grew up in London's East End and from age 16 worked as a machinist, a teacher in Hebrew schools, and as an entrepreneur. In 1929, Lerner entered the London School of Economics, where he studied under Friedrich Hayek. A six-month stay at Cambridge in 1934–1935 brought him into contact with John Maynard Keynes. In 1937, Lerner emigrated to the United States. While in the US, he befriended intellectual opponents Milton Friedman and Barry Goldwater.

Lerner never stayed at one institution long, serving on the faculties of nearly a dozen universities and accepting over 20 visiting appointments. Lerner was 62 when he was given a professorship at the University of California, Berkeley in 1965 and left after reaching mandatory retirement age six years later. During his time there, Lerner criticized the unrest caused by the student protests as a threat to academic freedom.

Abba Lerner taught in the Economics Department at Florida State University, for several years. He stopped teaching after he suffered a stroke while visiting Israel.

Although Lerner never received the Sveriges Riksbank's Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, he has been recognized as one of the greatest economists of his era.

Research

 * Lerner developed a model of market socialism which featured decentralised market pricing proportional to marginal social cost and in so doing contributed to the Lange–Lerner–Taylor theorem.
 * Lerner contributed to the idea of a social dividend by incorporating it into Oskar R. Lange's original model of socialism, where the social dividend would be distributed to each citizen as a lump-sum payment.
 * The use of fiscal policy and monetary policy as the twin tools of Keynesian economics is credited to Lerner by historians such as David Colander.
 * The Lerner symmetry theorem states that an import tariff can have the same effects as an export tax.
 * The Lerner index measures potential monopoly power as mark-up of price over marginal cost divided by price or equivalently the negative inverse of demand elasticity.
 * Lerner improved a formula of Alfred Marshall, which is known since as the Marshall–Lerner condition.
 * Lerner improved the calculations made by Wilhelm Launhardt on the effect of terms of trade.
 * Lerner developed the concept of distributive efficiency, which argued that economic equality will produce the greatest probable total utility with a given amount of wealth.
 * Based on effective demand and chartalism, Lerner developed functional finance, a theory of purposeful financing (and funding) to meet explicit goals, including full employment. This is in contrast to “sound finance” principles where taxation is designed solely to fund expenditure or finance investment and low inflation.
 * The Lerner–Samuelson theorem goes back to Lerner.

title: Abba P. Lerner


text:
Talk:Romford (UK Parliament constituency)

Untitled
There's a 43 year gap in the members of parliament section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Romford (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160129132219/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/2011/census-data/2011-census-interactive-content/index.html to http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/2011/census-data/2011-census-interactive-content/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150108053347/http://london.greenparty.org.uk:80/elections/2015-general-election.html to http://london.greenparty.org.uk/elections/2015-general-election.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

1955 and 1974
I am not sure this should be down as a Labour gain in 1955, nor that the figures for change should be based on the 1951 result. As noted at the top of the article the 1955 seat used different boundaries to those used in 1950 and 1951, excluding the Urban District of Brentwood (which probably would have had a fair chunk of Conservative support in it). It can also be seen that the number of electors dropped significantly. Equally in 1974, the seat was different from that fought in 1970. The Times Guide to the House of Commons for the first 1974 election records major boundary changes and does not class it as a Conservative gain, so I do not think it should be classed as one, and the change figures should probably be removed. Dunarc (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


text:
Wikipedia:Encyclopedia of Modern Jewish Culture topics

'''In accordance with Jimbo's instruction that we should not use lists of material from "an organization with whom we directly compete in the market", all single source lists of topics in other copyrighted encyclopedias have been deleted. Please choose another source of material to work on, such as the list of topics from the no longer copyrighted 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia Brittanica.'''


text:
Paul Kandel

Paul Kandel (born February 15, 1951) is an American musical theatre actor and tenor singer best known for his film role in Disney's The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996) as the voice of the Roma leader Clopin Trouillefou.

He also has appeared on Broadway a number of times, having appeared in Jesus Christ Superstar as King Herod, Titanic, The Who's Tommy, and The Visit. Kandel received a nomination for the 1993 Tony Award for Best Performance by a Featured Actor in a Musical for his portrayal of Uncle Ernie in The Who's Tommy.

Career
In 1997, he performed in Ron Daniels's version of the play One Flea Spare.

title: Paul Kandel


text: Talk:1960–61 NHL season

title: Talk:1960–61 NHL season


text: Talk:1961–62 NHL season

title: Talk:1961–62 NHL season


text: Talk:1962–63 NHL season

title: Talk:1962–63 NHL season


text:
Tonight at the London Palladium

Tonight at the London Palladium is a British television variety show that is hosted from the London Palladium theatre in the West End. Originally produced by ATV for the ITV network from 1955 to 1969, it went by its original name Sunday Night at the London Palladium from 25 September 1955 until the name was changed to The London Palladium Show from 1966 to 2 February 1969.

It underwent three revivals, first from 28 October 1973 to 28 October 1974 where it retained its Sunday Night at the London Palladium title, second in 2000 under the title Tonight at the London Palladium, and third from 2014 until 2015 under the title Sunday Night at the Palladium, dropping London. From 2016, the show is called Tonight at the London Palladium and is presented by Bradley Walsh.

A one-off Sunday Night at the London Palladium was screened to mark Bruce Forsyth's 70th birthday in February 1998.

History
The regular hosts of the show were Tommy Trinder (1955–1958), Bruce Forsyth (1958–1960 and 1961–1964), Don Arrol (1960–1961), Norman Vaughan (1962–1965, 1974), Jimmy Tarbuck (1965–1967), Jim Dale (1973–1974) and Ted Rogers (1974). Other guest comperes were: Hughie Green, Alfred Marks, Robert Morley, Arthur Haynes, Dickie Henderson, Dave Allen, Des O'Connor, Bob Monkhouse and Roger Moore.

The first ever show was compered by Tommy Trinder with Gracie Fields and Guy Mitchell being the night's big guests. The programme was one of ITV's most watched, reaching its biggest audience in January 1960 while Bruce Forsyth was the host, in an edition featuring Cliff Richard and the Shadows, watched by more than 20 million people.

However, according to the book Television's Greatest Hits written and researched by Paul Gambaccini and Rod Taylor the biggest viewing audience was 9.7 million in 1964 (although this would have been homes, rather than viewers, as this was the way British television viewing figures were recorded at the time). This was on Sunday 19 April when Bruce Forsyth introduced the Bachelors, Hope and Keen and Frank Ifield with the Pamela Devis Dancers.

After the Tiller Girls and the lesser acts in the first part was a game show imported from America, Beat the Clock, the format of which was rather like Bruce Forsyth's later hit in The Generation Game. It featured couples having to perform a trick or stunt, like even changing clothes (previously put on, on top of their ordinary clothes) with each other within a set time. If a couple could complete both stunts, the wife must rearrange words stuck to a magnetic board and people had to "arrange them into a well known phrase or saying" in 30 seconds. If she succeeded, the couple won a major prize. Whenever a bell rang, the couple who played at that time would play a jackpot stunt for a cash bonus worth £100 for each week since the last jackpot win.

The second part of the show was where the big stars shone. It featured many top people over the years including Bill Haley rocking around the clock, Chubby Checker who introduced the "new dance" the Twist to the country with a whole stage full of people dancing the Twist and Sammy Davis, Jr. met the Tiller Girls in 1961. Other star guests included: Judy Garland, Bob Hope, Johnnie Ray, Liberace, Petula Clark, the Seekers, the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. Italian mouse puppet Topo Gigio came back a number of times.

The Beatles' publicist Tony Barrow said that after the band's first appearance on the show on 13 October 1963, Beatlemania took off in the UK.

The show always ended using the huge revolving stage where the Tiller Girls, the compere and that night's guests stood on it as it slowly turned around to the familiar end tune of the show.

A famous episode took place in 1961 during a strike by the British acting union Equity, who refused to allow its performers to appear that week. Exempt from this, Bruce Forsyth and comedian Norman Wisdom performed the entire show themselves.

In 1967, the head of ATV, Lew Grade, axed the show. The reasons for this remain obscure, but Grade later said that axing the series was a mistake.

First revival (1973–1974)
This revival was hosted by Jim Dale and Ted Rogers, with each episode being broadcast live. Two episodes were cancelled mid-broadcast due, apparently to a reported bomb scare. One of these, hosted by Jim Dale, was broadcast for the first time on Talking Pictures UK on Sunday 3 May 2020. At the end a caption stated that this episode was never broadcast and was missing most of the graphics due to a bomb scare with cuts from previous shows being used to fill in the time.

Second revival (1998)
A one-off edition of Sunday Night at the London Palladium was broadcast on 15 March 1998, to celebrate Bruce Forsyth's 70th birthday. It included appearances by Diana Ross and Joe Longthorne.

Third revival (2000)
The format of Sunday Night at the London Palladium was revived in 2000 as Tonight at the London Palladium and was fronted by Bruce Forsyth. It was pre-recorded and aired on Friday evenings. The series was not a ratings success.

Fourth revival (2010)
On 29 August 2010, Gareth Parnell's Sunday Night at the London Palladium was performed by the staff of the theatre as a one-off commemorative show for the centenary of the Palladium.

Fifth revival (2014–2017)
A further revival in 2014, called Sunday Night at the Palladium began airing on ITV from 14 September 2014. The series aired for six episodes. On 19 October 2014, it was announced that the show had been recommissioned for a second revived series. This series began airing on 3 May 2015 for five episodes. Presenters of the revived series have included Bradley Walsh, Jimmy Carr and Alexander Armstrong.

From the third series onwards, it was renamed as Tonight at the London Palladium. The third series began airing on 13 April 2016. Episodes aired on Wednesday evenings and were presented by Bradley Walsh. Comedian Joe Pasquale featured in the series. Peter Andre also appeared in all episodes during the series. This series featured two old lady puppet characters called Alice and Audrey who worked at the venue's kiosk, which were designed and built by Puppets Magic Studio for ITV. Following the ratings success of the series, Tonight at the London Palladium returned for a fourth series on 19 April 2017: the puppets were in the Royal Box and called Ruby and Pearl.

Archive status
Very few episodes survive of the earliest versions of this series, including the 1973–1974 revival, though surviving episodes of Sunday Night at the London Palladium were repeated by Talking Pictures TV in 2020 and 2021. (For a general overview of the potential reasons for this, see Wiping.)

title: Tonight at the London Palladium


text:
Bob Barber (cricketer)

Robert William "Bob" Barber (born 26 September 1935) is a former English cricketer who played first-class cricket for Cambridge University, Lancashire and Warwickshire from 1954 to 1969. He also played 28 Test matches for England. He was named as one of the five Wisden Cricketers of the Year in 1967. An outstanding schoolboy cricketer at Ruthin School, Barber initially struggled to gain a place whilst at Cambridge after making his debut in 1955. Scoring 1000 runs for the first time in 1959, Barber was made captain of Lancashire.

Hampered by an intrusive committee and hostile crowd, Barber was perceived as not making the best of his own abilities, particularly as a leg spinner, though in a team boasting Test leg spinner Tommy Greenhough and useful allrounders in Grieves and Booth, both of whom were wrist spinners, Barber found it difficult to earn a place. He was replaced by Joe Blackledge in 1962, who met with no greater success as the county endured a difficult season. Joining Warwickshire, Barber was encouraged to play his shots and began to play regularly for England as an opening batsman. His greatest innings, and his only Test century, was made in the Third Test against Australia at the Sydney Cricket Ground in 1965–66. He made 185 off 255 balls and added 234 in even time with Geoff Boycott for the first wicket. It remains the highest score by an Englishman on the opening day of an Ashes Test. E.W. Swanton wrote: Often in bleak moments do I cast back to Bob Barber's 185 in front of 40,000 on that sunny Friday in January '66. He batted without chance for five hours, starting decorously enough and then hitting the ball progressively harder and with a superb disdain to every corner of the field. One recalls the exceptional vigour of his driving and how he brought his wrists into the cut, making room for the stroke. It made blissful watching to English eyes – to one pair in particular, for by a wonderful chance father Barber had flown in from home that very day. In 1969 he retired from county cricket although he appeared in the John Player League until 1971. Prominent in the early years of the Gillette Cup, he made little impression in the 40-over game. After retiring from cricket, Barber went into business and lives in Switzerland.

title: Bob Barber (cricketer)


text:
Talk:1963–64 NHL season

Bobby Baun
Either this article or the Baun article (ideally both) should be rephrased in such a way to indicate that the extent of Baun's injury (that it was a broken ankle) was not made known to the public (nor apparently known by anyone, including Baun) until after the playoffs were concluded. Having just seen the original CBC broadcast tonight on APTN of game 6, I can say that Baun was taken off the ice on a stretcher with nobody really knowing the extent of the injury (see my comment on the Baun talkpage), with the announcers astonished to see Baun back on the ice later in the period (when he's taken off they assert with confidence that his game is done). In the post-game interview with Baun, the injury takes precedence over the goal, with Baun suspecting that he has a pinched nerve, and seeming pretty confident that the injury is minor. While there may have been rumours to the contrary, nobody knew Baun's ankle was broken until after the series was over - probably my favourite detail of the whole incident. While the current phrasing may be technically correct, it fails to deliver the most amazing part of the story: Baun's desire to win trumped the excruitating (sp?) pain in his leg such that it never occurred to him that his leg was even broken. Wencer 06:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:1963–64 NHL season


text:
Felix Pipes

Fritz Felix Pipes (also "Piepes"; 15 April 1887 – 20 January 1983) was an Austrian tennis player who was born in Prague. He was Jewish, and was a medical doctor. At the 1912 Stockholm Olympics he teamed up with Arthur Zborzil to win a silver medal for Austria in the men's doubles event.

He also competed for Austria in singles in 1912, and in both singles and doubles (with Zborzil) at the 1908 Summer Olympics.

He was runner-up in the Austrian International Championship in both 1909 and 1913. He twice played at the World Hard Court Championships, losing in round one of singles in 1912 and in the quarterfinals of mixed doubles in 1912, and in round two in 1913.

title: Felix Pipes


text:
Rauschpfeife

A rauschpfeife (pl. rauschpfeifes or rauschpfeifen; German: Rauschpfeife, pl. Rauschpfeifen) is a capped conical reed musical instrument of the woodwind family, used in Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries. In common with the crumhorn and cornamuse, it is a wooden double-reed instrument with the reed enclosed in a windcap. The player blows into a slot in the top of the windcap to produce the sound.

Description
Rauschpfeifes (Schreierpfeiffen) differ from cornamusen mainly in the shape of the bore, which, like the shawm, is conical. This bore profile combined with the unrestricted vibration of the reed within the windcap produced an instrument that was exceedingly loud, which made it useful for outdoor performances.

The word Rauschpfeife (German for "rush (or reed) pipe" from the Old German "rusch" for 'rush', as in grass), is found in the description of two windcapped instruments depicted in one of the 16th-century woodcut illustrations of Triumphal Procession, commissioned by Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I. The 20th century music historian Curt Sachs believed these were the same as the capped shawms found in several European museums although their appearance is somewhat different from the extant examples. However, the instruments in the woodcut could just as easily be cylindrical bore capped douçaine-like instruments, especially considering the array of other soft instruments (viola da gamba, harp, viola da braccio, two lutes, pipe and tabor) in the picture. It seems most likely that the term "rauschpfeife" was used to denote woodwind instruments in general: for example, an order placed for instruments by the Nuremberg town council in 1538 indicated a need for 'rauschpfeiffen', but when the order was filled, it included recorders, cornetts, shawms and other instruments, but none specifically named 'rauschpfeife'.

The names associated in the period with the extant museum capped shawms are variants of the word "Schreierpfeife" (German for "shrieking pipe".) Michael Praetorius in Syntagma musicum II (1619) gives "Schreyerpfeiffen" as the German word for Schryari, which, judging by his description, ranges and illustration, were cylindrical bore instruments something akin to loud cornamusen. It would appear then that the term "Schreierpfeife" may have been used variously for the two types of loud capped reed instruments.

Consorts of rauschpfeiffen (schreierpfeiffen) are found in museum instrument collections in Berlin and Prague. A complete set of original instruments, ranging from sopranino to bass, from the second half of the 17th century is part of the so-called Naumburg wind instrument collection, which is on display in the Berlin Music Instrument Museum. Another solitary example is found in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna.

A similar instrument, the hautbois de poitou, is depicted and described by Marin Mersenne in his "Harmonie universelle" (1636.)

As with many instruments of this period and genre, the rauschpfeife or schreierpfeife has undergone something of a revival in recent decades. Examples are currently being made and played by early music enthusiasts worldwide. German Heinrich Moeck company produced two instruments in sopranino and soprano which visually refer to the Naumburg pipes. Because for quite some time, Moeck was the only manufacturer in Germany to produce rauschpfeifes in large numbers, the look of the rauschpfeifes in the 1970s was characterized by this manufacturer. The rauschpfeifes in Berlin are technically almost twice as large as they need to be. The tone holes of the instruments cover only half of the body. Because of this, Moeck's instruments have a large number of holes on the back, which serve solely to shorten and stabilize the air column inside the instrument.

After Moeck discontinued the production of rauschpfeifen, manufacturers based their instruments on the chanters of German bagpipes. The vast majority of the instruments are built in open, German recorder fingering system, and have a tonal range of a ninth. Their appearance is also similar to the chanter of the contemporary German bagpipe. As a result, many newly built rauschpfeifes have significantly larger bells than their historical ancestors. In addition, although having the same musical range, they are not quite half as long as the extant instruments of the Naumburg collection.

A further technical aspect is that modern instruments mainly use standard reeds from various kinds of bagpipes. The alto instruments in G/a are often played with Scottish reeds, the instruments based on French bagpipes often with plastic reeds for the Cornemuse du Centre, and the soprano rauschpfeifes in C/d often with reeds similar to those of the Spanish gaita.

title: Rauschpfeife


text:
Homologous temperature

Homologous temperature expresses the thermodynamic temperature of a material as a fraction of the thermodynamic temperature of its melting point (i.e. using the Kelvin scale):

$$ T_H = \frac{T (\text{K})}{T_{mp} (\text{K})} $$

For example, the homologous temperature of lead at room temperature (25 °C) is approximately 0.50 (TH = T/Tmp = 298 K/601 K = 0.50).

Significance of the homologous temperature
The homologous temperature of a substance is useful for determining the rate of steady state creep (diffusion-dependent deformation). A higher homologous temperature results in an exponentially higher rate of diffusion dependent deformation.

Additionally, for a given fixed homologous temperature, two materials with different melting points would have similar diffusion-dependent deformation behaviour. For example, solder (Tmp = 456 K) at 115 °C would have comparable mechanical properties to copper (Tmp = 1358 K) at 881 °C, because they would both be at 0.85Tmp despite being at different absolute temperatures.

In electronics applications, where circuits typically operate over a −55 °C to +125 °C range, eutectic tin-lead (Sn63) solder is working at 0.48Tmp to 0.87Tmp. The upper temperature is high relative to the melting point; from this we can deduce that solder will have limited mechanical strength (as a bulk material) and significant creep under stress. This is borne out by its comparatively low values for tensile strength, shear strength and modulus of elasticity. Copper, on the other hand, has a much higher melting point, so foils are working at only 0.16Tmp to 0.29Tmp and their properties are little affected by temperature.

title: Homologous temperature


text:
List of works produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions

This is a list of animated television series, made-for-television films, direct-to-video films, theatrical short subjects, and feature films produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions (also known as H-B Enterprises, H-B Enterprise Production Company, and Hanna-Barbera Cartoons). This list does not include the animated theatrical shorts William Hanna and Joseph Barbera produced while employed by MGM. Note that some shows or new spin-offs of shows may be listed twice. Hanna-Barbera won eight Emmy Awards. In 2001, Warner Bros. Animation took over function of Hanna-Barbera following the death of William Hanna.

For subsequent productions featuring Hanna-Barbera created characters, see Cartoon Network Studios and Warner Bros. Animation.

 * Key for below: = Won the Emmy Award

Cartoon Network Studios
As a division of Hanna-Barbera, for the independent studio see Cartoon Network Studios

The ABC Saturday Superstar Movie
Hanna-Barbera produced the following television movies for The ABC Saturday Superstar Movie:

ABC Afterschool Specials
Hanna-Barbera produced the following television movies / specials for the ABC Afterschool Special series:

Famous Classic Tales
Hanna-Barbera's Australian division produced the following CBS television specials for the Famous Classic Tales series:

ABC Weekend Specials
Hanna-Barbera and Hanna-Barbera's Australian division produced the following television movies / specials for the ABC Weekend Special series:

Hanna-Barbera Superstars 10
Hanna-Barbera Superstars 10 was a series of 10 syndicated telefilms made from 1987 to 1988 in conjunction with Worldvision Enterprises, featuring some of the most popular Hanna-Barbera characters in feature-length adventures. All 10 films are available on VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray.

The Flintstones Primetime Specials
Hanna-Barbera produced the following NBC television specials as part of The Flintstone Primetime Specials, the penultimate Hanna-Barbera production overall to contain a laugh track and also the final Hanna-Barbera production overall to contain one produced by the studio, a limited-run prime-time revival of The Flintstones:

The Smurfs prime-time specials
Hanna-Barbera also produced the following NBC prime-time television specials based on The Smurfs:

Other animated specials and telefilms
Hanna-Barbera also produced the following specials:

The Greatest Adventure: Stories from the Bible
The Greatest Adventure: Stories from the Bible was an animated film series about three young adventurers—Derek, Margo and Moki—who travel back in time to watch biblical events take place. Thirteen video cassettes were released between 1985 and 1992.

Timeless Tales from Hallmark
Timeless Tales from Hallmark (co-produced with Hallmark Cards) was a live-action/animated film series hosted by Olivia Newton-John who introduced each tale followed by an environmental message. Eight video cassettes were released between 1990 and 1991.

Scooby-Doo
Hanna-Barbera was credited as the sole production company behind the first four films. Despite being in-name only after 2001, the 1960s–1970s production logo from Hanna-Barbera was still used for the next Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films after Scooby-Doo and the Cyber Chase until Scooby-Doo! and the Samurai Sword. The first, third and fourth films were dedicated to Don Messick, Mary Kay Bergman and William Hanna, respectively.

Theatrical feature-length movies
Note: The Hanna-Barbera Feature division was spun into Turner Feature Animation after the company was bought out by Ted Turner.

Warner Bros. announced plans for a Hanna-Barbera cinematic universe at CinemaCon 2016, with Scoob! as its starting point.

Titles and sequences
Recruitment and industrial films

Theme park rides
A section of Wonderland Sydney was titled Hanna-Barbera Land and featured rides and facilities based on cartoon characters.

Hanna-Barbera Classic Collection
The Hanna-Barbera Classic Collection (once called the Hanna-Barbera Golden Collection, later called the Hanna-Barbera Diamond Collection) is a series of two-to-four-disc DVD box sets from Warner Home Video and later by Warner Archive, usually containing complete seasons and complete series of various classic Hanna-Barbera (with MGM Cartoons and Ruby-Spears) cartoons (along with the television movies and specials). The line began in March 2004.

2004

 * The Flintstones: The Complete First Season (March 16, 2004)
 * Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!: The Complete First and Second Seasons (March 16, 2004)
 * The Jetsons: The Complete First Season (May 11, 2004)
 * Jonny Quest: The Complete First Season (May 11, 2004)
 * Wacky Races: The Complete Series (October 19, 2004)
 * The Flintstones: The Complete Second Season (December 7, 2004)
 * Top Cat: The Complete Series (December 7, 2004)

2005

 * The Flintstones: The Complete Third Season (March 22, 2005)
 * The Best of the New Scooby-Doo Movies (March 22, 2005)
 * Dastardly and Muttley in Their Flying Machines: The Complete Series (May 10, 2005)
 * The Perils of Penelope Pitstop: The Complete Series (May 10, 2005)
 * The Flintstones: The Complete Fourth Season (November 15, 2005)
 * The Huckleberry Hound Show: Volume 1 (November 15, 2005)
 * The Yogi Bear Show: The Complete Series (November 15, 2005)

2006

 * The Flintstones: The Complete Fifth Season (March 7, 2006)
 * The Scooby-Doo/Dynomutt Hour: The Complete Series (March 7, 2006)
 * Magilla Gorilla: The Complete Series (August 15, 2006)
 * Hong Kong Phooey: The Complete Series (August 15, 2006)
 * The Flintstones: The Complete Sixth Season (September 5, 2006)

2007

 * Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!: The Complete Third Season (April 10, 2007)
 * Wait Till Your Father Gets Home: The Complete First Season (June 5, 2007)
 * Space Ghost and Dino Boy: The Complete Series (July 17, 2007)
 * Birdman and the Galaxy Trio: The Complete Series (July 17, 2007)
 * Josie and the Pussycats: The Complete Series (September 18, 2007)

2008

 * The Smurfs: Season One, Volume 1 (February 26, 2008)
 * The Pebbles and Bamm-Bamm Show: The Complete Series (March 18, 2008)
 * The Richie Rich/Scooby-Doo Show: Volume 1 (May 20, 2008)
 * The Smurfs: Season One, Volume 2 (October 7, 2008)

2009

 * The Real Adventures of Jonny Quest: Season 1, Volume 1 (February 17, 2009)
 * The Jetsons: Season 2, Volume 1 (June 2, 2009)

2009

 * Yogi's First Christmas (November 17, 2009) (TV movie)

2010

 * The 13 Ghosts of Scooby-Doo: The Complete Series (June 29, 2010)
 * The Pirates of Dark Water: The Complete Series (August 31, 2010)
 * Josie and the Pussycats in Outer Space: The Complete Series (October 19, 2010)
 * The Addams Family: The Complete Series (October 19, 2010)
 * The Funky Phantom: The Complete Series (October 26, 2010)
 * Goober and the Ghost Chasers: The Complete Series (October 26, 2010)
 * The Dukes: The Complete Series (December 7, 2010)
 * Yogi and the Invasion of the Space Bears (December 7, 2010) (TV movie)
 * Yogi Bear and the Magical Flight of the Spruce Goose (December 7, 2010) (TV movie)
 * Yogi's Great Escape (December 7, 2010) (TV movie)
 * SWAT Kats: The Radical Squadron: The Complete Series (December 14, 2010)
 * Thundarr the Barbarian: The Complete Series (December 17, 2010) (Ruby-Spears)

2011

 * Speed Buggy: The Complete Series (January 11, 2011)
 * Wheelie and the Chopper Bunch: The Complete Series (January 25, 2011)
 * Jabberjaw: The Complete Series (February 15, 2011)
 * The Space Kidettes / Young Samson (March 8, 2011)
 * Valley of the Dinosaurs: The Complete Series (March 22, 2011)
 * Chuck Norris: Karate Kommandos: The Complete Series (April 1, 2011) (Ruby-Spears)
 * Frankenstein Jr. and The Impossibles: The Complete Series (April 26, 2011)
 * Mister T: The Complete First Season (May 10, 2011) (Ruby-Spears)
 * Challenge of the GoBots: The Original Miniseries (May 17, 2011)
 * The Herculoids: The Complete Series (June 14, 2011)
 * The Jetsons Meet the Flintstones (June 14, 2011) (TV movie)
 * Moby Dick and Mighty Mightor: The Complete Series (July 19, 2011)
 * Rockin' with Judy Jetson (August 9, 2011) (TV movie)
 * The Good, the Bad, and Huckleberry Hound (August 9, 2011) (TV movie)
 * Top Cat and the Beverly Hills Cats (August 9, 2011) (TV movie)
 * Jonny Quest vs. The Cyber Insects (August 9, 2011) (TV movie)
 * Jonny's Golden Quest (August 9, 2011) (TV movie)
 * Dragon's Lair (September 20, 2011) (Ruby-Spears)
 * A Flintstone Christmas Collection (September 27, 2011)
 * A Flintstone Christmas (TV special)
 * A Flintstone Family Christmas (TV special)
 * The Jetsons: Season 2, Volume 2 (November 8, 2011)

2012

 * Pac-Man: The Complete First Season (January 31, 2012)
 * The Real Adventures of Jonny Quest: Season 1, Volume 2 (March 27, 2012)
 * Shazzan: The Complete Series (April 3, 2012)
 * Inch High, Private Eye: The Complete Series (April 24, 2012)
 * Sealab 2020: The Complete Series (May 22, 2012)
 * The Amazing Chan and the Chan Clan: The Complete Series (June 19, 2012)
 * Hanna-Barbera Christmas Classics Collection (July 31, 2012)
 * The Town Santa Forgot (TV special)
 * A Christmas Story (TV special)
 * Casper's First Christmas (TV special)
 * Sky Commanders: The Complete Animated Series (August 28, 2012)
 * The Halloween Tree (August 28, 2012) (TV movie)
 * Pac-Man: The Complete Second Season (September 11, 2012)
 * Snorks: The Complete First Season (September 25, 2012)
 * The Flintstones Prime-Time Specials Collection: Volume 1 (October 9, 2012)
 * The Flintstones Meet Rockula and Frankenstone (TV special)
 * The Flintstones: Little Big League (TV special)
 * The Flintstones Prime-Time Specials Collection: Volume 2 (October 9, 2012)
 * The Flintstones' New Neighbors (TV special)
 * Fred's Final Fling (TV special)
 * Wind-Up Wilma (TV special)
 * Jogging Fever (TV special)
 * I Yabba-Dabba Do! (October 9, 2012) (TV movie)
 * Hollyrock-a-Bye Baby (October 9, 2012) (TV movie)

2013

 * Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kids: The Complete Series (January 15, 2013)
 * The Completely Mental Misadventures of Ed Grimley: The Complete Series (January 29, 2013)
 * Yogi's Gang: The Complete Series (February 19, 2013)
 * Help!... It's the Hair Bear Bunch!: The Complete Series (March 12, 2013)
 * The Roman Holidays: The Complete Series (April 23, 2013)
 * Captain Caveman and the Teen Angels: The Complete Series (July 23, 2013)
 * Casper's Halloween Special (October 1, 2013) (TV special)
 * The Thanksgiving That Almost Wasn't (TV special)
 * Space Stars: The Complete Series (October 8, 2013)

2014

 * Jonny Quest: The Complete Eighties Adventures (April 8, 2014)
 * Challenge of the GoBots: The Series, Volume 1 (May 6, 2014)
 * The Jetsons: Season 3 (May 13, 2014)
 * Loopy De Loop: The Complete Collection (September 9, 2014)
 * Shirt Tales: The Complete Series (September 16, 2014)
 * The Super Globetrotters: The Complete Series (October 28, 2014)

2015

 * Dumb and Dumber: The Complete Series (January 13, 2015)
 * Challenge of the GoBots: The Series, Volume 2 (March 10, 2015)
 * Snorks: The Complete Second Season (July 7, 2015)
 * Centurions: Part 1 (July 21, 2015) (Ruby-Spears)
 * Clue Club: The Complete Animated Series (August 11, 2015)
 * Hanna-Barbera Specials Collection (September 15, 2015)
 * The Last of the Curlews (TV special)
 * Oliver and the Artful Dodger (TV special)
 * The Adventures of Robin Hoodnik (TV special)
 * The Three Musketeers (TV special)
 * Cyrano (TV special)
 * Jack and the Beanstalk (September 15, 2015) (TV special)
 * Atom Ant: The Complete Series (October 6, 2015)
 * The Secret Squirrel Show: The Complete Series (November 3, 2015)
 * The Real Adventures of Jonny Quest: The Complete Second Season (November 10, 2015)
 * Galtar and the Golden Lance: The Complete Series (November 10, 2015)

2016

 * Centurions: Part 2 (March 15, 2016) (Ruby-Spears)
 * Devlin: The Complete Series (May 24, 2016)
 * The New Adventures of Huckleberry Finn: The Complete Series (June 28, 2016)
 * Where's Huddles?: The Complete Series (July 26, 2016)
 * The Kwicky Koala Show: The Complete Series (October 11, 2016)
 * The Peter Potamus Show: The Complete Series (November 1, 2016)
 * Snorks: The Complete Third and Fourth Seasons (December 6, 2016)

2017

 * Top Cat: The Complete Series (January 10, 2017) (re-release)
 * Wacky Races: The Complete Series (February 14, 2017) (re-release)
 * Monchhichis: The Complete Series (April 18, 2017)
 * Dink, the Little Dinosaur: The Complete Series (October 10, 2017) (Ruby-Spears)
 * Space Ghost and Dino Boy: The Complete Series (December 5, 2017) (re-release)
 * Birdman and the Galaxy Trio: The Complete Series (December 5, 2017) (re-release)

2018

 * Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!: The Complete Series (February 13, 2018)
 * The Biskitts: The Complete Series (February 20, 2018)
 * 2 Stupid Dogs/Super Secret Secret Squirrel: Volume 1 (August 14, 2018)

2019

 * Paw Paws: The Complete Series (April 9, 2019)
 * The Best of The New Scooby-Doo Movies: The Lost Episodes (June 4, 2019)
 * The New Scooby-Doo Movies: The (Almost) Complete Collection (June 4, 2019)
 * Wally Gator: The Complete Series (June 25, 2019)
 * Lippy the Lion & Hardy Har Har: The Complete Series (July 9, 2019)
 * Tom and Jerry Spotlight Collection: Vol. 1–3 (October 15, 2019)

2020

 * Paddington Bear: The Complete Series (July 31, 2020)
 * The Flintstones: 2 Movies and 5 Specials (August 4, 2020)

2017

 * The Flintstones: The Complete First Season (May 23, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Jetsons: The Complete First Season (May 23, 2017) (re-release)
 * Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!: The Complete First and Second Seasons (May 23, 2017) (re-release)
 * Dastardly and Muttley in Their Flying Machines: The Complete Series (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * Hong Kong Phooey: The Complete Series (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Huckleberry Hound Show: Season 1, Volume 1 (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * Jonny Quest: The Complete First Season (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * Magilla Gorilla: The Complete Series (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Perils of Penelope Pitstop: The Complete Series (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!: The Complete Third Season (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Best of The New Scooby-Doo Movies (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * Top Cat: The Complete Series (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * Wacky Races: The Complete Series (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Yogi Bear Show: The Complete Series (June 6, 2017) (re-release)
 * Josie and the Pussycats: The Complete Series (June 20, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Pebbles and Bamm-Bamm Show: The Complete Series (June 20, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Smurfs: The First Season (June 20, 2017) (re-release)
 * Tom and Jerry Spotlight Collection: Volume 2 (October 3, 2017) (re-release) (MGM Cartoons)
 * Tom and Jerry Spotlight Collection: Volume 3 (October 3, 2017) (re-release) (MGM Cartoons)
 * The Flintstones: The Complete Second Season (October 3, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Flintstones: The Complete Third Season (October 3, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Flintstones: The Complete Fourth Season (October 3, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Flintstones: The Complete Fifth Season (October 3, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Flintstones: The Complete Sixth Season (October 3, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Scooby-Doo/Dynomutt Hour: The Complete Series (October 3, 2017) (re-release)
 * The Richie Rich/Scooby-Doo Show: Volume 1 (October 3, 2017) (re-release)
 * Hanna-Barbera Diamond Collection 4-Pack (December 5, 2017)

2018

 * The Flintstones: The Complete Series (February 13, 2018) (re-release)

2020

 * The Jetsons: The Complete Series (October 13, 2020)

2019

 * The New Scooby-Doo Movies: The (Almost) Complete Collection (June 4, 2019)
 * Jonny Quest: The Complete Series (June 11, 2019)
 * Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!: The Complete Series (September 3, 2019)
 * The Jetsons: The Complete Original Series (September 10, 2019)

2020

 * The Flintstones: The Complete Series (October 13, 2020)
 * Space Ghost & Dino Boy: The Complete Series (October 13, 2020)
 * Josie and the Pussycats: The Complete Series (November 3, 2020)

2021

 * Thundarr the Barbarian: The Complete Series (April 6, 2021) (Ruby-Spears)
 * Josie and the Pussycats in Outer Space: The Complete Series (April 13, 2021)
 * The Herculoids: The Complete Original Series (July 27, 2021)

2022

 * Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!: The Complete Series (March 1, 2022) (re-release)

2023

 * Hey There, It's Yogi Bear! (May 30, 2023) (film) (re-release)

2024

 * Hanna-Barbera Superstars 10 (February 20, 2024) (film series)
 * Yogi's Great Escape
 * Scooby-Doo Meets the Boo Brothers
 * The Jetsons Meet the Flintstones
 * Yogi Bear and the Magical Flight of the Spruce Goose
 * Top Cat and the Beverly Hills Cats
 * The Good, the Bad, and Huckleberry Hound
 * Rockin' with Judy Jetson
 * Scooby-Doo and the Ghoul School
 * Scooby-Doo and the Reluctant Werewolf
 * Yogi and the Invasion of the Space Bears
 * Top Cat: The Complete Series (August 27, 2024)


text:
Bryza

The name Bryza is associated with:

 * Matthew Bryza - a United States diplomat
 * PZL M28B Bryza - a Polish STOL light maritime patrol, cargo and passenger plane

title: Bryza


text: Talk:1964–65 NHL season

title: Talk:1964–65 NHL season


text:
Talk:1965–66 NHL season

One hell of a mess, but.
I've cleaned it up a good bit, eliminating a bunch of irrelevancies and numerous word-for-word copyvios from Trail of the Stanley Cup. Ravenswing 04:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Conn Smythe Trophy
I'm too new to Wikipedia to want to edit the page, but I'd like to point out that the following paragraph contains an error: "Two new trophies was introduced for this season. Jack Adams won the first Lester Patrick Trophy for his contribution to hockey in the United States. This was also the first season the Conn Smythe Trophy was awarded for the most valuable player in the Stanley Cup playoffs."

The Conn Smythe Trophy was introduced for the 1964-65 season, as evidenced by http://www.nhl.com/trophies/smythe.html. This is also mentioned on the Wikipedia page for the 1965-65 season. 164.10.46.61 11:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Ormiss

title: Talk:1965–66 NHL season


text:
Talk:Affective forecasting

Change
Changed class to undefined, so it can be defined by the proper Wikiproject Ethulin (talk) 23:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay, re:separating psychological immune system and affective forecasting. Take a look at my sandbox to see how an expanded affective forecasting article is coming along. It's a work in progress, but I am looking for some feedback about the psychological immune system section. I believe the expansion merits separating these two articles again. I have mentioned the immune system in regards to immune neglect, because it specifically informs affective forecasting, however, other components of the immune system (like terror management) don't have anything to do with affective forecasting. --No23139116 (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

The quote displaying two sample questions from a study on affective forecasting ("Imagine that one morning...feel that way?") strikes me as randomly placed. Why is it there? It's just floating up there without any contextual information; I'm inclined to remove it.

Also, I'm wondering how others feel about the merging of affective forecasting and the psychological immune system articles. If anything, shouldn't affective forecasting fall under the much wider umbrella of a psychological immune system? Thoughts on separation?

No23139116 (talk) 18:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Affective forecasting is an established term used in a wide range of research to refer to a specific thing that people do. "Psychological immune system" is an off-hand term used by one or two researchers (whom I greatly admire!) to refer to a fuzzy collection of different processes. MartinPoulter (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

 * I agree, 'affective forecasting' is a more general and better term; 'Psychological immune system' not as much so.   I also agree that the sample questions are detailed and out of context and should probably be removed (or at the very least moved and contextualized much better). --Jayzzee (talk) 01:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Okay, I see what you're saying about specificity, but I still don't know what the "psychological immune system" construct is doing here. The talk history indicates that the rationale to merge articles was because both were formerly stubs. I'd like to expand affective forecasting—assuming I beef it up, do you think that the psych immune system section should remain as is? No23139116 (talk) 05:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

 * I think an affective forecasting page will probably refer to psychological immune system because some of the prominent researchers on this issue use the term. (Because we do not think about the things that help us cope, we over estimate the influence of emotional events.) So, you could keep what's there, but I could also imagine some editing or cutting. Right now the balance seems quite off --I think that 'immune system' should be a much smaller proportion of the content on a forecasting page. As this page grows I could imagine them becoming separate pages again too.  --Jayzzee (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Sounds reasonable; copy that. No23139116 (talk) 20:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

I am curious about how affective forecasting may play out in the lives of college students.

Can students predict their happiness (say in a career) based on their experience in college? How much of that prediction is based on what they are learning in/through classroom learning? How does affective forecasting change for students over their college career? Does future happiness change when a student changes majors (or other potential life altering decisions)?

I cut out the following paragraph.

"A classic example is that of an overweight teenager who is shunned by his peers, and plans on losing his excess weight which is at the root of his social ineptitude. After that, he would have the confidence to be more positively assertive and become more well-liked by his peers and feel more belonged, due to him having planned everything out starting with the root of his problem."

My main reason is that this is not a "classic example" of affective forecasting. Affective forecasting just means judging how you will feel in the future, and isn't about solving problems by planning things out. The example could possibly be rewritten to refer to a teenager who thinks that losing weight will make him happier, and then finds that it either does or does not. However, affective forecasting is mostly concerned with cognitive biases that lead to inaccurate forecasts, and this example does not lend itself to illustrating that point. ("Classic" examples in the field are more along the lines of people predicting how they will feel if their team wins the championship, or their party loses the election.)

Furthermore, the paragraph is confusing and contains grammatical errors.

Mujokan 11:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

I also cut out the final paragraph: "Affective forecasting is an important concept in psychology, because psychologists try to study what situations in life are important to humans, and how they change their views with time."

It is not up to encyclopedia standard, and just states the obvious.

Mujokan 11:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the effects of the "focusing illusion" or "focalism" in affective forecasting and the subfield decision making: it has been found that the focusing illusion causes an impact bias in predicted satisfaction with public transit, something which subsequently results in biased predicted satisfaction. It has also been found that "defocusing techniques" counteract this adverse effect of the focusing illusion (focalism), something which makes predicted satisfaction with public transit become more accurate and thus may facilitate a travel mode change. The effect is explained to be this: The Focusing illusion or Focalism makes people focus on a narrow range of features, thus disregarding the broader context in which the event takes place. This causes an impact bias. Defocusing techniques, however, introduce other features, thereby making people aware of the fact that the focal event is embedded in a broader context, something that counteracts the focusing illusion and helps people make more accurate predictions about satisfaciton with public transit. (it has been referred to predicted satisfaction with public transit in the subfield of decision making, but the information on public transit and focusing illusion / defocusing techniques are new, very recent results) Reference: Pedersen, Tore (2011). Affective Forecasting in Travel Mode Choice. Karlstad University Studies. Karlstad, Sweden. Unfortunately, I'not technically capable of adding add this information to this wiki-article on affective forecasting, but I will attempt to learn how to do it - although if someone wants to add it before I get around to doing it, please feel free :-) Urbanlife61 (talk) 20:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I cut the paragraph about "Future Anhedonia" and the sentence alluding to it in the Time Discounting section for several reasons. The most important is that recent research has found the results of the experiment that led to the term "future anhedonia" to be due to an artifact of the hypothetical questionnaire research methodology, not an actual differnce in people's estimates of their happiness in receiving rewards (McFall, & Abraham, 2016). Other researchers conducted a non-hypothetical, real-world version of the task and there was no effect (Ahearn et al., 2015). Additionally, the paragraph was poorly written and several ofthe statements and examples were not consistent with the Kassam et al. (2008) study that was the sole support for the paragraph. It's best when an encyclopedia entry replies on multiple sources of evidence vs. one study.

Here are specific problems with the cut text: "It is expected that affective reactions to an event will be less intense in the future than in the present.[34]" - based on Kassam et al. (2008) study, so the findings are not clear. Also, the sentence is ambiguous. It's uncleaar whether it refers to a belief that people have that their affective reactions to an event in the future would be less intense, or whether it refers to a finding that people's affective experiences actually differ based on the timing of the expected event. These are different; furthermore, the Kassam study did not measure people's awareness of differences in their affect between present and future events.

"Future anhedonia is an affective forecasting error which occurs when a person believes that they will experience less intense affects of an event that will occur in the future, than if the same event occurred in the present,[34] meaning that if a bad thing happens right now it would be considered much worse than if it happens next year." Again, based on one study that is being contested. More importantly, the example is not appropriate. The Kasam study only measured positive events, mainly receiving $20, which in of itself is not a strong positive event for most people. Negative events can have different temporal profiles than positive events, see research on negativity biases.

"Forecasts of the duration of feelings often capture the tendency for emotions to fade over time, but underestimate the speed in which this happens.[5]" This is irrelevant to the rest of the paragrpah.

"For example, in a study participants were asked to predict their happiness after receiving $20. They rated how happy they would feel if they were to receive $20 tomorrow or if they were to receive it in a year. They found that participants predicted that they would be happier receiving $20 sooner, compared to receiving it in the future.[34] Applied to affective forecasting, this helps explain why people underestimate the intensity of future events.[34] They consider how they are feeling now much more than how they would feel in the future." This is the description of the Kassam method. Later research shows that people's ratings of how happy they are include their subjective valuation of instant gratification; in other words, they do not only answer the question based on how happy the $20 makes them, but how happy they are to have to wait to get it. No one wants to wait. It's simply delayed gratification. When people were asked to explain their differences in their affective valuations of present and future $20 rewards, they indicated they wanted the money now. No one indicated that they would like the money more now than how much they would like it later (MCFall & Abraham, 2016). This shows that using hypothetical surveys to study decision making can faciliate experimenter bias - a survey can be designed for a purpose and easily interpreted consistently with that aim, because the measure does not necessarily tease apart people's true motives.

Finally, the whole paragrpah has some writing/grammar/style problems. Mcfa0750 (talk) 02:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Page additions
I am currently working with a group of fellow psychology students to enrich the content of the affective forecasting Wiki. We are considering three specific additions to the page content:

1) The region-beta paradox is only briefly mentioned in the immune neglect section. The page currently states that this process "complicates forecasting, leading to errors". It does not, however, discuss how this complication affects ecologically valid behaviors. Our group is interested in filling this gap using recent experimental work from Cameron and Payne (2011). These authors found evidence that the region-beta paradox helps to explain the collapse of compassion phenomenon, where individuals’ compassion decreases as the number of people in need of help increases. In study 2 participants read about either 1 or a group of 8 children from Darfur, and were told that they would be asked to make a donation later in the experiment. Using a dynamic measure of affect, the researchers assessed whether collapse of compassion results from proactive emotional regulation driven by accurate affective forecasts, or reactive regulation in response to currently experienced negative emotions. The results suggest that only skilled emotion regulators experience collapse of compassion, and that they do so by proactively regulating their emotions prior to the onset of any initial negative affect. In order to further establish the causal role of proactive emotional regulation in the collapse of compassion phenomenon, study 3 participants read the same materials and were encouraged to either down-regulate or experience their emotions. Participants instructed to down-regulate their emotions reported feeling less upset for 8 children than for 1, presumably because of the increased emotional burden and regulatory effort required for the former (an example of the region-beta paradox).

2) The wikipedia page is missing information about personality neglect. Personality neglect is a theory that individuals overlook their personalities when making decisions about the future. We think this should be apart of the page as it is a characteristic of affective forecasting. In a study done by Quoidbach & Dunn (2010), they used students feelings about future exam score predictions as a way to measure the effect. They had students rate their dispositional happiness before they received their exam grades. They also rated how they would feel two weeks after receiving their exam grades. They found that individuals failed to to relate their personal dispositional happiness to their future emotional state. This was not enough information to provide enough proof of personality neglect so they performed a second study. Study 2 had participants rate their own happiness and neuroticism. This time, they used participants future feeling predictions about a US presidential election between Obama and McCain. They found that neuroticism was correlated with impact bias, the overestimation in feelings of how long and intense those feelings were. Individuals who had higher rated neurotic traits, showed a stronger tendency to overestimate happiness linked with a positive event.

3) The positive vs. negative affect section is extremely brief and generalized, and our group feels it is important to elaborate on the differences between positive and negative affects, and the variables that play a role in the differences. The section currently just states that “accuracy in affective forecasting is greater for positive than negative affect.”  This broad and vague claim as it is now is not entirely correct, as displayed by the findings of Finkenauer, Gallucci, van Dijk, & Pollman (2007).  The researchers studied the diaries of students who were soon to take their driver’s license exam, and made affective forecasts about the outcome of the upcoming exam in their diaries.  Finkenauer et al. (2007)  discovered that people showed greater forecasting accuracy for positive affect than negative affect when the event/trigger is distant and greater forecasting accuracy for negative affect when the event/trigger is closer in time. This compelling distinction and including the influence of time for accuracy of positive and negative affects is critical in updating this brief section with more extensive and correct information than what is currently present.

Cameron, C., & Payne, B. (2011). Escaping affect: How motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1-15.

Finkenauer, C., Gallucci, M., van Dijk, W., & Pollmann, M. (2007). Investigating the role of time in affective forecasting: Temporal influences on forecasting accuracy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1152-1166.

Quoidbach, J., & Dunn, E. W. (2010). Personality neglect: The unforeseen impact of personal dispositions on emotional life. Psychological Science, 21, 1783-1786.

ThePhilosophyof9 (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Affective forecasting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140313195415/http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/07/magazine/07HAPPINESS.html?ei=5070&en=ed to http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/07/magazine/07HAPPINESS.html?ei=5070&en=ed

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Affective forecasting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140305103022/http://webs.wofford.edu/pechwj/Anomalies%20-%20Utility%20Maximization%20and%20Experienced%20Utility.pdf to http://webs.wofford.edu/pechwj/Anomalies%20-%20Utility%20Maximization%20and%20Experienced%20Utility.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131104071920/http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/morewedg/personal/papers/thingsnotsobad.pdf to http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/morewedg/personal/papers/thingsnotsobad.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/gl20/GeorgeLoewenstein//Papers_files/pdf/projection_bias.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/gl20/GeorgeLoewenstein/Papers_files/pdf/Hot%3AColdIntraEmpathyGap.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.179.1288&rep=rep1&type=pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:46, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Affective forecasting


text:
Arthur Zborzil

Arthur Zborzil (15 July 1885 – 15 October 1937) was a male tennis player from Austria. At the 1912 Stockholm Olympics he teamed up with Felix Pipes to win a silver medal in the men's doubles event.

Zborzil also competed at the 1908 Summer Olympics, but he lost his first match in the singles event as well as his first match with Felix Pipes in the doubles event.

title: Arthur Zborzil


text:
Talk:1966–67 NHL season

Recent additions
If the recent additions to this article sound like the season recap out of a book, they do. Each and every one of them (a few word-for-word) come from the 67 season recap from Trail Of The Stanley Cup, even down to the season-ending injury to Matt Ravlich, a journeyman defenseman who logged only 400 games over ten seasons and whose travails wouldn't normally be remotely notable. Certain events such as Bobby Orr's debut, Hull setting the goal record, Toronto's last Cup and Chicago's first first-place finish are worthy of inclusion if shorn of sportswriterese. Ravenswing 06:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Edit War
Lookit, you're both in danger of a 3RR violation here, as well as this getting rather childish. Ravenswing, why not leave the information for a while and open discussion here regarding whether it's notable, let other editors offer their two cents and keep it or remove it per consensus? That's what Wikipedia's all about.

Now come on, stop flooding the RC feed =P --Moralis 21:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: if the information is kept, it's going to need to be edited for tone, and overspecific detail removed (here's looking at you, Rangers-Toronto paragraph). --Moralis 21:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Which is exactly my point. The tireless Mr. Bryant started copying the incident list word-for-word from well-known published works, and while (after MUCH back and forth and the aforementioned open discussion) he's finally taken it out of copyvio, he's kept the article flooded with non-notable, trivial incidents presented in the same jocular, sportswriter recap tone as prevails in the works from which he takes the material.  As it happens, this issue was opened up to comment from Wikiproject regulars two weeks ago, and none of us have any objection to milestones and significant events -- nor have, in fact, ripped up Mr. Bryant's numerous other edits to NHL season articles, but here he insists on including non-encyclopedic incidents and game summaries.  Every editor who has yet commented has rejected Mr. Bryant's version; none have yet supported it.  That is consensus.  Ravenswing 21:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Mr. Bryant's version contains far too much POV and improper tone. Flibirigit 22:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Apologies. I was not aware of the WikiProject discussion, only the lack of discussion here. If this persists I would advise placing vandalism warnings, and if necessary, reporting Mr. Bryant to WP:AIV. Alternatively consider placing the article on WP:RfP though if the problem is a single user, this seems unnecessary. --Moralis 22:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't think vandalism warnings to be appropriate; whatever my opinion of Mr. Bryant, there is no doubt but that he is contributing according to his lights. Inducing him to accept consensus and wrap his head around WP:OWN is as far as we'd prefer, I daresay.  Ravenswing 15:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

And ... he's still not listening, and restored his edits. I've just filed an RfC on it. Ravenswing 20:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Corey Bryant's edits have blatant POV, and if he continues to be a hassle he should get blocked for a short period. Croat Canuck  Go Leafs Go   00:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

 * Why does User:Corey Bryant not participate in this discussion? It would nice if everyone was involed. Flibirigit 01:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I just touched up his talk page and urged him to do so; he's reverted his edits yet again. Ravenswing 21:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Mr. Bryant argues on User talk:Ravenswing that the content he added is not copyrighted because he wrote things in his own words. But even in his own words, its excessive wordiness and POV. Flibirigit 22:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * If information is revised so that it does not copy word for word an author's words,

it is not copyrighted material. As such every single solitary taking down of my contribution to 1966-67 is vandalism. And every person on this board is guilty of harassment against me as well. I notice on NO OTHER SEASON has anything been taken down. That's proof that it is harassment and threats against me.Corey Bryant 20:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Why do you feel that Eddie Giacomin blowing a 3-1 lead against Boston in a regular season game is noteworthy and encyclopedic? Lots of goalies, including ones better than Fast Eddie, have blown 3-1 leads.  This sort of edit isn't even noteworthy enough to be included on Eddie's page here.  Some of your edits wouldn't be noteworthy on the season pages, but could be on the player pages.  And please, calm down.  Patken4 00:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Why is it important to mention that Eddie Giacomin blew a 3-1 lead November 9th, 1966?

Because the fans---HIS OWN!!--- were BRUTAL! They threw garbage at him and cursed him. Can you HONESTLY think that a goaltender subjected to such horrible abuse could turn things around and become a winner and record 9 shutouts? Not under normal conditions. That's why it is important for it to be mentioned for the 1966-67 season. And about this business of wordiness: I quote a line from the TV series Perry Mason, episode "The Case of the Witless Witness" in which Perry quotes Judge Daniel Redmond: "If we do not fight for the dignity of truth, we have substituted expediency for justice." Flibirigit, then, is a jerk because his complaint of "wordiness" because the season by season account is FOR events of THAT particular season. It is made, then, to inform the public what happened that particular year. If it is not of quality, it is not worthy to have a season by season account, which I have tried to make every season I have uploaded. Flibirigit only operates on the principle of expedience, not of quality. Corey Bryant 21:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Possibly you're not all that familiar with hockey in particular or sports in general, but incidents of stars overcoming a single mediocre game are uncountable ... never mind from a mere 3-3 tie. Such edits are not remotely encyclopedic, and you've admitted yourself that you're parroting the accounts of other authors, which isn't likely to produce a genuine assessment of the notability of events.  It's as if you did a recap of the year 2006 based on the half-dozen daily headlines Comcast produces, which today includes such timeless news flashes like "Family Leaves Baby at Toys-R-Us" and "Online Vote Reveals Spears Is Worst Dog Owner," surely classic events over which historians will be thrilled centuries from now.  In any event, we don't merely disagree with your assessment, so far we are doing so unanimously.  Finally, you are aware, I hope and trust, that Wikipedia forbids personal attacks.  Ravenswing 22:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I followed the NHL for 30 years from 1967-68 to 1997-98. I'm an expert. Now what can you say to me that can say otherwise? Hockey history is my specialty. I ought to be the National Hockey League's official historian.Corey Bryant 20:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

 * To expand on what Ravenswing wrote, there have been many instances of fans of a particular team booing a player on their team, even star athletes. Patrick Roy was booed in Montreal.  Jaromir Jagr was booed in Pittsburgh.  Rare is the player that hasn't been booed a time or two by the home fans.  It's simply the fickle nature of fans.  We shouldn't document every instance of a player getting poor treatment by fans, unless it is truely noteworthy (such as a fan attacking them) or if it happened throughout the players career there.  This Eddie Giacomin incident doesn't really seem all that notable.  Looking at Eddie's page, it appears you have added a reference to this game.  Forgiving the notibility question of it, it's definately POV:

"Giacomin was impressive in his first month as Rangers goaltender, but soon his inexperience caught up with him and the fans he'd won over turned on him and he was booed by the fans. In his sophomore year, in a game against the Boston Bruins in November, he blew a 3-1 lead in the game's final two minutes and the fans really turned abusive. The fans threw garbage at Eddie and booed him viciously. Eddie was badly shaken, but from there he won games and won back the fans who had turned on him.
 * If a reference to this incident were to stay on the Giacomin page, you would have to make it less POV and cut it down. I would also suggest you finding other incidents if they occurred.  Look at the Mike Schmidt page, a player who is rather famous for not always getting along with the Philly fans, for a guide as to how to incorporate this into Giacomin's page.  Regardless, I don't see it deserving of any mention on the 66-67 page.  As for your other comments, I'll just repeat Ravenswing's comments above; no personal attacks.  Patken4 23:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The Ranger fans were VERY abusive to Eddie Giacomin on

November 9th, 1966. One beer bottle exploded only ten feet from him.

Now about this business of personal attacks: you wanted me on this board, so accept the bullshit. After all, you wanted to block me, made threats to do so. Should I be any other way but abusive? Corey Bryant 20:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please read what I have to say at www.hockeyforums.com in the trash talk section

Well, I got hand it to hockeyforums.com: they certainly don't like an argument to spread to their site. They took down my trash talk post, saying that it doesn't do to carry an argument from one site to another. They said it doesn't do either site any good. Still, they might see my point the kind of abuse I'm taking here. Corey Bryant 21:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Corey Bryant 21:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * There's been mention of blocking you for exactly that syndrome - that you are not only both making unencyclopedic entries and edit warring over the same, but contemptuous of Wikipedia policies and practices as well, a premise bolstered by a casual glance at your Talk page. You were asked to participate in this discussion in the hope that you would contribute to a consensus as to what changes to this article would be encyclopedic and notable. You've chosen instead to demand that your edits be free from the peer-review and editing to which every other editor on Wikipedia is subject, and make personal attacks against others. We do not, in fact, have to "accept the bullshit," and I urge you both to cease personal attacks before stronger measures are necessary and engage in some constructive discussion on this article. Ravenswing 21:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm continuing the discussion about Giacomin at his talk page. Patken4 22:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well ... first off, if you're implying you've made similar edits to other NHL season pages, thanks for the tipoff; I'll start going over them tonight and making corrections as needed. Secondly, the sentence that is on every edit page is "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."  There is nothing about your edits that make them immune to the standard Wikipedia peer-review process for encyclopedic merit.  I strongly urge you to review WP:OWN and ask yourself why you feel you don't have to work within consensus.  Ravenswing 04:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

down which was not copyrighted, but copyrighted material on the Detroit Red Wings sweaters being stolen was added. Now really!! You acuse me of using copyrighted material, then replace something I contributed that is not copyrighted and add copyrighted material! What hypocrisy!Corey Bryant 21:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I notice that on the 1965-66 season board that my post of Eddie Giacomin was taken
 * "Note that copyright law governs the creative expression of ideas, not the ideas or information themselves. Therefore, it is legal to read an encyclopedia article or other work, reformulate the concepts in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia." You, by contrast, have submitted numerous word-for-word copies of published works, and strenuously denied it until citations of the same were given.  That 65-66 season page was chockful of word-for-word copyvios from Trail of the Stanley Cup (and quite possibly from other works), as well as full of unencyclopedic and non-notable events, and no doubt there are a number more such articles requiring urgent attention.  Perhaps you could do everyone a favor and remedy the copyvios and more egregious trivial events before we get it them ourselves.

 * Oh, and as far as the www.hockeyforums.com crew? Before your attack topic was pulled for violating that site's no personal attacks rules, the unanimous reaction of those who commented were that you should either quit or give it up.  I admit that the user who posted a "Care-O-Meter" set for zero was amusing.  Ravenswing 22:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, I didn't name names when I posted it at hockeyforums. I just attacked wikipedia in general, saying the editors--no names--were pulling down my posts at wikipedia.

And remember that I was using my own words after the copyrighted stuff on 1966-67 was pulled down here. I decided that since, yes, it was copyrighted, to instead put it in my own words---yet it was pulled down anyway. That's not fair and you know it.Corey Bryant 20:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Your edits were not subsquenly removed for Copyright violation. They were removed/altered for lack of notability and poor writing style. Flibirigit 20:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * "Fair?" This isn't a kindergarten playground, it's an encyclopedia.  I'll reiterate: "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."  That is Wikipedia policy.  We can't help it if that bothers you too much.  Ravenswing 07:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Croat Canuck is a jerk. He doesn't know vandalism from true information. As long as I get accused falsely of everything from "POV" to vandalism, that's proof that all this shithead gang of jerks are only trying to attack my contributions, not to create a useful site.
 * Reply: "There's been mention of blocking you for exactly that syndrome - that you are not only both making unencyclopedic entries and edit warring over the same, but contemptuous of Wikipedia policies and practices as well, a premise bolstered by a casual glance at your Talk page. You were asked to participate in this discussion in the hope that you would contribute to a consensus as to what changes to this article would be encyclopedic and notable. You've chosen instead to demand that your edits be free from the peer-review and editing to which every other editor on Wikipedia is subject, and make personal attacks against others. We do not, in fact, have to "accept the bullshit," and I urge you both to cease personal attacks before stronger measures are necessary and engage in some constructive discussion on this article." I wrote the preceding bit eight months ago.  Plainly you've learned nothing, and there's no reason to presume you're capable of learning now.  It isn't just on Wikipedia; you took your rants to another board, and you were told there to stop  whining.  I doubt a temporary block will get your attention, but at least while you're blocked you won't make more work for us to undo.  There's something, at least.    Ravenswing  12:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Orr: Arguably the Greatest Defenceman
I removed calling Orr arguably the greatest because its very subjective. While I know this is a weak argument, remember that not everyone considers him the best. Personally, I think there are others who are also deserving of the title as well, but that doesn't matter. Look at some of the others to compete for the title. Eddie Shore had everything in his body broken several times, yet still managed to help the Bruins to their last Cup until Orr arrived. Doug Harvey allowed for the Canadiens to never worry about defence. Orr was fortunate to play in an era of hyper-expansion. The talent was diluted considerably. Also he never played a full season. Thats why I removed that phrase. Kaiser matias 07:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * There's been a lot of debate over Orr on Wikipedia, but I was comfortable with the phrase myself; it is plain that the merits of Shore/Harvey/Bourque aside, the great preponderance of public and expert opinion is that he was the greatest defenseman of all time. Arguably he is; certainly many sources make exactly that argument.  Ravenswing 12:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

 * I went and added the Orr part about him being "arguably" the best defenseman ever. THN did a "Top 50 players ever" poll in 1996.  Orr was #2, behind Gretzky.  Only other defensemen in top 10 were Harvey at #6 and Shore at #10 (Bourque was #14).  Patken4 21:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:1966–67 NHL season


text:
Talk:1967–68 NHL season

1967–68 NHL transactions
Hm. The article doesn't exist, but I see that the editor's creating season transaction articles, so I'll hold off reverting for a couple of days.   Ravenswing     04:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:1967–68 NHL season