text:
Chartered Governance Institute

The Chartered Governance Institute (previously known as The Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators, ICSA) is a qualifying and membership body for company secretaries and governance professionals operating in several common law jurisdictions.

The Institute has divisions in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, Zimbabwe, the United Kingdom, and Ireland.

The division based in London is known as The Chartered Governance Institute UK & Ireland. It represents and supports members in the United Kingdom, the Republic of Ireland, Crown Dependencies, and associated territories, including the Caribbean, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Mauritius, and Sri Lanka.

The Institute has 38 branches and special interest groups, including the Chartered Secretaries Professional Practice Group, the Association of Women Chartered Secretaries and the CGI Registrars Group, and affiliations with organizations like the Worshipful Company of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators. The Chartered Governance Institute is a member of the CBI, ECODA, and the Professional Associations Research Network (PARN), and is a founding member of The Next Generation NED Network.

History
Founded as the London-based Institute of Secretaries in 1891 to represent the interests of corporate secretaries, who had emerged to govern the administration of joint stock companies following the introduction of limited liability in 1855. A royal charter was granted in 1902. In 1970, the Institute of Secretaries merged with the Corporation of Secretaries and then became the Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators (ICSA) in 1971. In 2019, ICSA was renamed as The Chartered Governance Institute.

Profile
The Chartered Governance Institute independently advocates for reform in governance and provides thought leadership and guidance to the public, private, and not-for-profit sectors. The Institute qualifies chartered secretaries and chartered governance professionals, conducts public and in-house training for governance professionals across different sectors, and offers bespoke training for boards. The divisions of the Institute publish magazines and resources to keep practitioners up to date with the latest in law, regulation, and procedure, including guidance, research, and specialist publications. They also run conferences for those working in corporate governance, charity governance, sports governance, and academy governance. The Institute also offers board performance and governance reviews and holds annual awards.

Education
The Chartered Governance Institute provides qualifications in governance and awards post-nominals. The post-nominals awarded for chartered membership are Fellow (FCG/FCIS) and Associate (ACG/ACIS). For professional and part-qualified membership, the post-nominal is CG (Affiliated). Graduate members can use the post-nominal Grad CG or Grad ICSA. See List of post-nominal letters (United Kingdom).

The Chartered Governance Qualifying Program (CGQP) is the institute's flagship qualification and the most common route to graduate status and chartered membership in the institute. A person who has completed the CGQP and satisfying the prescribed working experience requirement is eligible for election as an associate or fellow of the institute. Associates and fellows are entitled to use the designation "Chartered Secretary" or "Chartered Governance Professional" or both, depending on the modules they have completed as part of the CGQP. "Chartered Secretary" and the post-nominal "ACIS" are listed in the  European Union (Recognition of Professional Qualifications) Regulations 2015, schedule 1, part 2 (Professions Regulated by Professional Bodies Incorporated by Royal Charter), thus making chartered secretaries a regulated profession. Both Chartered Secretary and Chartered Governance Professional are designations approved by the Privy Council of the United Kingdom.

The division based in London also offers a Foundation Program, providing a broad introduction to business, governance, administration, compliance and company law; validated postgraduate courses; and short course qualifications in international finance and administration, corporate governance, charity governance, education governance, sports governance and health service governance. Holders of these qualifications are eligible for Affiliated membership. Other courses and qualifications are provided across all the divisions. Memoranda of Understanding are in place with The Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) and The Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators of Nigeria (ICSAN).

Charities Act 2011
The Chartered Governance Institute is one of eleven professional bodies whose members are allowed by the Charities Act 2011 in the UK to conduct independent examination of charities whose gross income exceeds £250,000 but is not otherwise subject to statutory audit.

title: Chartered Governance Institute


text: User talk:69.139.251.204

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:69.139.251.204


text:
Jean-Paul Samputu

Jean-Paul Samputu (born 15 March 1962) is a Rwandan singer, songwriter, and musician. A winner of the Kora Award in 2003, Samputu travels the world as a cultural ambassador for Rwanda.

Born in Rwanda in 1962, Samputu began singing in 1977 in a church choir, and was influenced by traditional and contemporary music, including Stevie Wonder, Bob Marley, Jimmy Cliff, and Lionel Richie. He arrived in the US in 2004 for Ten Years Remembering, an event commemorating the 10th anniversary of the genocide in Rwanda.

Samputu sings in six languages (Kinyarwanda, Swahili, Lingala, Ganda, French and English) and in styles ranging from soukous, rhumba and reggae, to traditional Rwandan 5/8, Afrobeat, pygmy, and gospel. He combines unique musical traditions from all regions of Rwanda, among them, Intwatwa, Umushayayo, Imparamba, and Ikinimba.

Early life
Jean Paul Samputu was born on 15 March 1962 in Butare, Rwanda.

Awards and honours

 * Kora Award for Most Promising African Male Artist, 2003
 * 2006 International Songwriting Competition: 1st-place winner for World Music for "Psalm 150"
 * Inter Religious and International Federation for World Peace: Ambassador of Peace, 2007

Singles
Band)
 * Suzuki (1983 with Nyampinga
 * Nyaruguru
 * Ingendo Y'Abeza (1984 with Nyampinga Band)
 * Mr. Bigirumwami (1986 with Ingeli Band)
 * Rwanda Rwiza (1987)
 * Twararutashye (1993 with Ingeli Band)
 * Kenyera Inkindi Y'Ubuzima (1995)
 * Mutima W'Urugo (1996)
 * Ubaha Ikiremwa Muntu (1997)
 * Ubuphura Buba Munda (1997)
 * Igihe Kirageze (1999)
 * Disi Garuka (2000)

title: Jean-Paul Samputu


text:
WCEE

WCEE may refer to:

 * WCEE-LD, a low-power television station (channel 17, virtual 16) licensed to serve Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
 * WPXS, formerly known as WCEE, an affiliate of RTV serving the St. Louis designated market area
 * WIFR, formerly known as WCEE, a CBS television affiliate based in Rockford, Illinois and licensed to nearby Freeport
 * WGRV-LP, formerly known as WCEE-LP, a smooth jazz radio station in Melbourne, Florida

title: WCEE


text:
Talk:DVD-by-mail

general survey article
To allow this to remain a general survey article, I've moved the list of companies from here to their own article - List of online DVD rental companies. David Oberst 23:27:18, 2005-09-05 (UTC)

Technical Video Rental
Given that there is a Wikipedia page for Technical Video Rental (one that conforms to the corporate template, too), I think that it actually belongs in the country section where it was originally, not in the external links section.

What are your thoughts for moving it away? Let's talk it out.

(If there's no response here after a few days, I'll assume that it wasn't a deeply held opinion, and I'll move it back)

-- Tjic

original preference
My original preference was to eventually have each country section give a short overview of the market dynamics and peculiarities, indicate the major players, and provide a link to an external source for complete lists if possible. Otherwise the lists become very long (the UK could be almost 40 including all the "powered by" variations), and it becomes a market guide instead of a reference article. The US section was inherited from the Netflix article, and I was hesitant to tread too heavily and reformat the individual listings until I had some idea of what to do with them. I'm not sure if it is current or complete (I'm Canadian).

It may be that people would prefer to have complete lists of all companies within Wikipedia (especially as there may not be convenient and accurate external lists for all areas). Perhaps a separate article along the lines of "Complete list of DVD rental companies" (although this may be bad form) could perform this function, allowing the country sections here to be simpler summaries. Or instead of a separate article, perhaps the section could be retitled "Summary by Country" (or "Region"). I've revised the article in this direction - comments anyone? The doubled regions in the in the "Contents" box is unfortunate, but I think perhaps prefereable to having to scroll through large numbers of companies to read each country summary. I'll check into suppressing these, or some other visual tweak.

TVR seemed interesting enough that I wanted to keep a reference to it, but didn't want to duplicate it in both US and Canada, and start down the path to listing the entire Canadian market (it could probably go as high as 18 depending on what is counted!). There wasn't any sort of "Specialty rentals" section, so I moved it to External for the nonce. If the "full company list" approach (in whatever form) is retained, then of course it can be listed in the appropriate sections.

Also, hopefully people will contribute to expanding the "How it works section", which is largely as I found it. David Oberst 07:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

I'm starting to create a full list of companies here, in hopes of eventual ideas on where they should go, what format, etc. The raw list seems large and out of place in a reference article, and doesn't provide enough useful information about the companies for a guide.

couple of the reference sites
I put back in a couple of the reference sites removed by Rhobite's edit. Full disclosure - the "dvdinfo.ca" site for Canada is my own, and I'll remove it if a consensus forms here. However, I created it solely to provide information on Canadian DVD rentals, and there is no advertising or partner referrals of any kind. The "onlinedvdrentalguide.ca" site (not affiliated with me, although they use my inventory estimates in their ratings) does put referrals in the links on its list of companies, but does so agnostically so for all companies that have such a scheme, and the message forums there are probably the single most useful resource for anyone interested in knowing more about the Canadian companies. I also put the "DVDrr.com" link back in - it was the handiest single source for info on all the English-speaking companies, and seems quite un-opinionated (although it does have a few affilate links for the UK companies. My intent was to try and provide links to useful outside info for each country, while avoiding shill sites, etc.  I'd welcome comments.  David Oberst 16:26, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I strongly disagree with your decision to link to your own site. I also don't think dvdrr should be linked, since they make money off of referrals. Rhobite 16:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, do you think my content on "dvdinfo.ca" isn't a relevant link for the article, or is it just a "bad appearences" factor at linking to my own site? There isn't much I can do about the latter, but as for the former, I'd like to think that the inventory information and some of the tools would be considered useful for anyone wanting "more information" on the Canadian companies. I can certainly attest that there is absolutely no commercial or financial component involved! As for the sites that use affiliate referral links, my general view is that I don't really have a problem if they don't bias or influence the presentation and content of an otherwise highly useful site, which seems to be the case for onlinedvdrentalguide.ca and dvdrr.com (I've seen some "review" sites that only list companies that provide affliate revenues, for instance). For wikipedia links perhaps a complete "no linking to any site whatsoever that contains referral links" is necessary, but it would be a shame to not give readers a chance to access otherwise acceptable resources.David Oberst 17:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I like the content of your site, but I don't think site owners should ever link their own sites from Wikipedia articles, even if they are good resources. I realize that the content on external review sites like dvdrr may be useful to readers, but these sites are a dime a dozen and I don't think Wikipedia should link to sites whose main goal is affiliate revenue. Another problem is spammers will come along and say "dvdrr is linked, so why can't I link my own site?" I would rather just link to the proper listing on dmoz and let readers decide for themselves. Rhobite 18:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Package DVD rentals
The author mentions "package" programs, but fails to give examples. Actually, there are no examples for any of the listed programs. This probably needs to be included. {subst:unsigned|02:13, 5 August 2006|Mrskippy}}

 * The two I know about are RelayRentals and CineDVDMax in Canada, both quite small. Since I'm Canadian myself I was hoping to find an example from another country, but if I can't I'll make a mention of them. - David Oberst 04:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Prepaid and DVD2order.com
I've removed the following paragraph for now:

 * "Pre-Paid" : New to online movie renting is the ability to pre-pay for your dvd rentals. Pre-paid rentals means you can hold onto your movies longer. With other plans, such as unlimited, you have to return one movie to get another from your list. With Pre-Paid memberships you pay a certain amount each month to recieve movies from your personal list and you'll keep getting movies from your list with no concern of sending one out the next day, just to get another. That's the idea behind pre-paid memberships. You'll have to send movies out less often and be rest assured that you'll be getting movies in the mail on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis depending on which type of "Pre-Paid" plan you choose.

This has been inserted by User:68.83.125.207, who would appear to be doing promotional work for DVD2order.com, whose article (created by User:DVD2ORDER was recently speedy-deleted as advertising. It currently reads like (badly written) promotional copy - obviously the movies sent must be returned at some point, and the connection between returns and movies sent, and the basis for "hold onto your movies longer" is completely unclear.  The DVD2order website currently has broken links for any of the "how it works" on the Prepaid plan, and is not currently accepting signups or providing details on this plan.  I would suggest that the people involved with what appears to be a startup business concentrate on that, rather than using Wikipedia to jump-start their advertising. - David Oberst 04:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Ireland
I ran into multiple versions of a news story that LoveFilm purchased Irish firm Screenclick early in 2006. However, Lovefilm's sight, which describes its operations in Germany and Scandinavia, and its whitelabel partnerships in the UK, makes no mention of Screenclick or Ireland. Did this deal fall through (although I can find no source for this). "Lovefilm.ie", which the stories speculated would be the new branding for Screenclick, actually redirects to Busy Bee (hijacked?)? - David Oberst

I also note that there is onlinedvdrentals.ie which I assume is a competitor of screeclick but not mentioned. --Gramscis cousin (talk) 12:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Niche companies:
Acording to Oberst:...Undid revision 132620244 by Lostinlodos ...niche companies not needed in overview, etc.) Just because I'm curious! I'm not sure why you would undo the two additions I added whilst leaving the "Content edited" group. There are only two or three censored DVD rental companies. That constitutes a niche just as much as the others. NetFlix may have been the template on which the industry was built, but eHit.com opened the door for ALL niche companies that came after them. I figured that that would be substantial enough to include them. What do you all think? Lostinlodos 08:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

 * No offense intended. There used to be a (now-deleted) List of Online DVD companies article, but this one is merely attempting to give a brief overview of each market.  Is there something especially notable about eHit, which doesn't have an article of its own?  The content-edited stuff at least ties in to a separate article, involves issues of copyrights, lawsuits, etc.  If anything, I'd be tempted to rewrite the paragraph to get rid of the explicit mention of GameznFlix, except that I'm not sure if there are any other online video game rental companies that do movies.  - David Oberst 14:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

I believe the most notable thing about eHit.com would be they were the first to lock a target audience, a niche, if you will. And they survived. When they popped onto the scene in 2000; they were the only one to do that. Everyone else came later. They were also the first to filter previously rented/rated movies from the catalogue; something most companies adopted later on. Depending on where you look, they're the third or forth busiest (customer:rental average) company behind NetFlix, Blockbuster, and from some sources Adult DVD Empire. I'm for keeping GamznFlix as I agree I can't find any other paired service. However; if edited/censored movies are to be discussed, it should probably get its own paragraph over the controversy and mention BlockBuster's special/exclusives that are also content edited. Along with that, they are a quick-fail side of the industry; so they are notable, 'though not representative of the industry as a whole. Not sure why the list of companies was killed off after it was spun away from this article, but it would probably benefit to re-add it back to this article. Beyond that; I'll see over the weekend how much NOR I can pull together for a few other companies, including eHit.com and GamznFlix, and put together or expand the entries about them. Thoughts? Lostinlodos 11:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Removed advertising. IntelliFlix
IntelliFlix offers nothing that was not offered by others before it. Not unique enough to fall into encyclopaedic classification for inclusion in this article. Lostinlodos (talk) 11:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Add this？
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GreenCine —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.95.160.55 (talk) 05:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Name change
I changed the name. It now includes Blu-ray. Please do not change it. Thank You!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris1294 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * This name is improper, and should, if it must include HD formats, be "Online DVD and Blu-ray Rental" as NO CURRENT MAJOR COMPANY USES BLU-RAY AS A PRIMARY PRODUCT. I would propose Online Video Rental or Video-By-Mail, or something to that effect instead. Lostinlodos (talk) 23:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Im just updating this as technology updates. Blu-ray will eventually be the primary product, just as DVD replaced VHS. I think online movie rental would be the BEST choice. THANK YOU!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris1294 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Do NOT include HDDVD and VCD
Do NOT include HDDVD and VCD, they are discontinued!!!!!

 * HD-DVD is still supported by some Eastern companies, and still available for rent from NetFlix, Cineflix, et al. VCD is still available from many companies including Cineflix, Family Video, Starz, eHit, CineFilm, CleanFilm, .... I follow your reasoning on the updates and removals, but as long as they're available, they should be noted. Lostinlodos (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * An fyi;Cleanfilm and cineflix are no longer in business. Cinflix is in biz, but not sure that they carry VCD.Jehosaphatz (talk) 04:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Point taken but I will point to these: and everyone renting HD-DVDs from NetFlix got an email stating "While we will continue to make our current selection of HD DVD titles available to you for the next several months, we will not be adding additional HD DVD titles or reordering replacements." and that they would continue to offer them through atleast the end of this year (2009). A quick google will show that.

HDDVD AND VCD are both dead formats ---there is no use in including them in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.199.50 (talk) 03:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * As long as they continue to be made available for rent they should be included for completeness. "Dead" is a relative term. Lostinlodos (talk) 05:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup request
I recommended this article for cleanup. Many cos out of biz, needs citations in spots, and dead links need help. Please help me in cleaning thi article.Jehosaphatz (talk) 04:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Removed out of biz cos and rental software providers. Changed tone in US section; toned down uncited ref of adultdvdempire being the largest and added goflix.com as another adult only company. fixed spelling and grammer. Updated netflix customer counts and added ref to netflix 2008 annual report.Jehosaphatz (talk) 06:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice work. Only change I made (if you missed it) was that there are only three restaurants with RedBox units; so I reverted the i.e. back to a flat-tone statement. Otherwise great work. Lostinlodos (talk) 18:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks Lostinlodos. I removed a parenthesis that was stranded in that same paragraph. In addition, I re-wrote that sentence regarding kiosks to make it a smoother and more wikified read. Question: In your opinion, should there be an external link or other reference to companies such as adultdvdempire that don't have their own wikipedia articles?Jehosaphatz (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably. If you go back a ways in the history you'll find that I had tried to deal with this before, as to how to recognize the red links, and who should and should not be included. Honestly I believe some of these companies need their own articles, but I've been shot down on that idea before. There also used to be a list of online rental companies (which I think should be brought back) where they all resided in their own little one-paragraph entries. For quite a few months (years?) a few of these company's own articles and this page have been quite a mess of fandom; everyone was a general and no one wanted to listen to others. Things have now finally begun to calm down on this article. For the time being; direct links to the external sites for redlinks should do until I can find a cache of the old "list of" file and attempt to rebuild it. You've been a nice change of pace from the past. Hope you can keep going and we can all just be happy!? Lostinlodos (talk) 05:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I was just looking for that list you mentioned, do you have a link to the history or the deletion discussion? It seems odd that it would be taken down - and the US section on this page reads like an ad. It feels like a heavy hand is working on this topic...99.141.246.60 (talk) 21:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Video Mailbox
Here's an article with brochures and a YouTube advertizement from the 80s company "Video Mailbox," which was like Netflix. http://www.hackingnetflix.com/2009/08/was-video-mailbox-the-first-moviesbymail-rental-company.html Included in the comments are some details by the founder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.28.223 (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on DVD-by-mail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070403091725/http://www.boston.com:80/business/articles/2006/02/10/throttling_angers_netflix_heavy_renters/ to http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2006/02/10/throttling_angers_netflix_heavy_renters/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on DVD-by-mail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928040749/http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/non_broadcast/Adjudication+Details.htm?Adjudication_id=41603 to http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/non_broadcast/Adjudication+Details.htm?Adjudication_id=41603
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070423055748/http://blockbuster.mediaroom.com:80/index.php?s=press_releases to http://blockbuster.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=666

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DVD-by-mail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070322233633/http://www.blockbuster.com/corporate/termsAndConditions to http://www.blockbuster.com/corporate/termsAndConditions
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926235113/http://www.lovefilm.co.uk/corporate/news_item.html?item=5753 to http://www.lovefilm.co.uk/corporate/news_item.html?item=5753

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:DVD-by-mail


text:
User:Cbogart2

Hi, I'm Chris Bogart. I'm also cbogart but it won't email me the password, so I can't get back in to that account. I'm a student at Oregon State University. More about me

I'm using this as a sandbox
Here's a link to the band, Tool.

Headline text
$$e^x dy/dx$$--Cbogart2 04:34, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Deterministic DEVS and Non-deterministic DEVS
Let $$A$$ and $$B$$ be two arbitrary sets. Then function $$f:A \rightarrow B$$ is called deterministic if give an $$a \in A$$, the values of callings $$f(a)$$ at different times are identical. Otherwise, $$f$$ is called non-deterministic.

A DEVS $$M=$$ is called deterministic if $$ta$$, $$\delta_{ext}$$, $$\delta_{int}$$ and $$\lambda$$ are deterministic. Otherwise, $$ M $$ is called non-deterministic.

The atomic DEVS model for player A of Fig. 1 is given Player=$$$$ such that
 * The atomic DEVS Model for Ping-Pong Players

$$ X = \{?receive\}\, $$

$$Y=\{!send\}\, $$

$$S=\{(d,\sigma)| d \in \{Wait,Send\}, \sigma \in \mathbb{T}^\infty\}\, $$ and $$s_0=(Send,0.1)\, $$

$$ta(s)=\sigma \text{ for all } s \in S\, $$

$$\delta_{ext}((Wait,\sigma),t_e),?receive)=(Send,0.1)\, $$

$$\delta_{ext}((Send,\sigma,t_e),?receive)=(Send, \sigma-t_e)\,$$

$$\delta_{int}(Send,\sigma)=(Wait,\infty),\delta_{int}(Wait,\sigma)=(Send,0.1)\,$$

$$\lambda(Send,\sigma)=?send,\lambda_{int}(Wait,\sigma)=\phi\,$$

Both of Player A and Player B are deterministic DEVS models.

title: User:Cbogart2


text:
Boffo Games

Boffo Games was a video game developer founded in 1994 by Steve Meretzky, Mike Dornbrook, and Leo DaCosta. The logo was designed by Gayle Syska, formerly of Infocom. Boffo produced two games, Hodj 'n' Podj and The Space Bar, before closing its doors in 1997. Hodj 'n' Podj was originally designed for Media Vision but it divested all of its multimedia interests following a securities-fraud scandal and the title was purchased by Virgin Interactive. The Space Bar was originally to be published by Rocket Science Games (RSG) but SegaSoft bought out RSG and became the game's publisher.

History
In late 1993, designer Steve Meretzky began to consider founding an independent game development studio with his friends Mike Dornbrook and Leo DaCosta. The three of them had gone to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology together, and Meretzky had worked with Dornbrook at Infocom and with DaCosta during the 1990s.

Following the 1989 closure of Infocom, Meretzky worked on a contractual basis for companies such as Legend Entertainment. However, Meretzky later called this period of remote work "creatively unsatisfying" and sometimes "frustrating". He preferred to work on location with a team, and he decided that he no longer wanted "to design games for someone else thousands of miles away."

The involvement of Dornbrook, a business school graduate, made the idea of an independent company more viable. According to Meretzky, the final impetus for the project came when Dornbrook read an article about Media Vision's new game division, founded in mid-1993 under record label executive Stan Cornyn. As Cornyn was an acquaintance of Dornbrook's, Dornbrook was able to secure a New York meeting with the executive's second-in-command, Linda Rich.

List of games made by Boffo

 * Hodj 'n' Podj
 * Reverse Alien (cancelled)
 * The Space Bar

title: Boffo Games


text:
Albert Hudson

Albert Blellock Hudson (August 21, 1875 – January 6, 1947 ) was a politician, lawyer and judge from Manitoba, Canada. He served in the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba from 1914 to 1920 as a member of the Manitoba Liberal Party, and was a cabinet minister in the government of Tobias Norris. He later served in the House of Commons of Canada from 1921 to 1925, as a member of the Liberal Party of Canada. In 1936, Hudson was appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Biography
Hudson was born in Pembroke, Ontario, the son of Albert Hudson and Elizabeth Blellock, and was educated in Portage la Prairie and Winnipeg. He received a law degree from the University of Manitoba in 1898 and was called to the Manitoba bar the next year. He founded the firm of Hudson, Ormond & Marlatt, with which he practised law for thirty-one years. In 1914, he was named King's Counsel. Hudson married Mary R. Russell in 1908. In religion, Hudson was a Presbyterian.

He was first elected to the Manitoba legislature in the provincial election of 1914, defeating incumbent Conservative Lendrum McMeans by 998 votes in the Winnipeg South "A" constituency. The Conservatives won this election, and Hudson sat with his party on the opposition benches.

The Conservative administration of Rodmond Roblin was forced to resign from office in 1915 amid a corruption scandal, and the Liberals were called on to form a new government. Norris was sworn in as Premier of Manitoba on May 15, 1915, and named Hudson as his Attorney-General and Minister of Telephones and Telegraphs. A new election was called, which the Liberals won in a landslide. Hudson was easily returned in Winnipeg South "A", and held both of his cabinet portfolios until resigning from office November 10, 1917. According to a Winnipeg Free Press report, Hudson had wanted to resign for several months to better oversee his personal business. He served as a backbencher for the remainder of legislative sitting, and did not seek re-election in the 1920 campaign.

Hudson then moved to national politics, seeking election to the Canadian House of Commons in the 1921 federal election. He defeated Conservative George Nelson Jackson by 2,866 votes to win the Winnipeg South riding, and served as a backbench supporter of William Lyon Mackenzie King's government for the next four years. He did not seek re-election in the 1925 campaign.

On March 24, 1936, Hudson was appointed a Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He held this position until his death in 1947.

Archives
There is an Albert Blellock Hudson fonds at Library and Archives Canada. Archival reference number is R4653.

title: Albert Hudson


text:
Bandung Regency

Bandung Regency (Kabupaten Bandung) is an administrative landlocked regency located to the south, southeast, east and northeast of the city of Bandung. The northern parts of the Bandung Regency are effectively part of Greater Bandung (technically the whole of the Regency is within the Bandung Metropolitan Area), with the southern third being less urbanized and jutting upwards from the Valley, though not as sharply as the mountain range to the immediate north of Bandung. The Regency is part of the Indonesian province of West Java, and is situated about 75 miles southeast of Jakarta. The town of Soreang is the regency seat.

The Regency was reduced in size as first Cimahi City (which became an independent city on 21 June 2001) and then West Bandung Regency (on 2 January 2007) were split off from the regency, resulting in a land area of 1,762.40 km2. In the 2010 Census, the population of this residual area reached 3,178,543 after final adjustments, while the 2020 Census increased the total to 3,623,790; the official estimate as at mid 2023 was 3,721,111 - comprising 1,894,101 males and 1,827,010 females, for an average density of roughly 2,111.4 per square kilometre. It is the second most populous (after Bogor Regency) of all the regencies of Indonesia.

Administration
Bandung Regency's current regent is Dadang Supriatna, while Sahrul Gunawan is the vice regent.

Administrative districts
Bandung Regency is divided into thirty-one districts (kecamatan), encompassing 280 administrative villages (desa and kelurahan). The districts are listed below with their areas and their populations at the 2010 Census and 2020 Census, together with the official estimates as at mid 2023. The table also includes the locations of the district administrative centres, the number of administrative villages in each district (totaling 270 rural desa and 10 urban kelurahan), and its post code.

Cimenyan, Cilrengkrang and Cileunyi Districts (which lie immediately to the north and east of the city) and Bojongsoang, Dayeuhkolot, Margahayu and Margaasih Districts (which lie immediately to the south of the city) are virtually extensions to the built-up area of Bandung.

Notes: (a) including the urban kelurahan of Rancaekek Kencana. (b) comprising 5 kelurahan (Andir, Baleendah, Jelekong, Manggahang and Wargamekar) and 3 desa. (c) except Malakasari desa, which has a post code of 40258. (d) including the kelurahan of Sulaeman. (e) including the kelurahan of Pasawahan. (f) including the 2 kelurahan of Cibeunying and Padasuka.

.

Neighbouring administrations
Bandung Regency is bordered by:
 * North = West Bandung Regency, Cimahi city, Bandung city, Subang Regency, Sumedang Regency.
 * East = Sumedang Regency, Garut Regency.
 * South = Garut Regency, Cianjur Regency.
 * West = Cianjur Regency, West Bandung Regency.

Nature reserves

 * Mount Tilu (Nature Reserve) in Pangalengan and Pasirjambu.
 * Patengan (Nature Reserve) in Rancabali.
 * Malabar (Nature Reserve) in Pangalengan.
 * Mount Patuha (Nature Reserve) in Rancabali and Pasirjambu with the Kawah Putih tourist site.
 * Situ Cisanti (Nature Reserve) in Kertasari

Mountains and volcanoes

 * Mount Tilu in Pangalengan.
 * Mount Waringin in Pasirjambu and Pangalengan.
 * Malabar Mountain, Besar Peak in Pangalengan, Puntang Peak in Cimaung, Haruman Peak in Pangalengan and Cimaung, Malabar Peak in Pacet, and also several peaks in Pangalengan, Cimaung, Banjaran, and Pacet.
 * Mount Riung Gunung in Pangalengan.
 * Mount Maud in Pasirjambu.
 * Mount Kendang in Kertasari.
 * Mount Bedil in Pangalengan.
 * Mount Kencana in Pangalengan.
 * Mount Mandalawangi in Rancabali and Ciwidey.
 * Mount Kendeng, stratovolcano west of Rancabali and east of Sukanagara [id] in Cianjur Regency
 * Mount Patuha volcano in Rancabali and Pasirjambu with Kawah Putih crater nearby.
 * Wayang volcano in Pangalengan and Kertasari.
 * Windu volcano in Pangalengan.
 * Manglayang volcano in Cimenyan and Cikacung.
 * Kawah Ciwidey volcano in Pasirjambu.
 * Papandayan volcano in Kertasari.
 * Kamojang volcano in Ibun.

Because of the mountainous nature of parts of the Bandung District, major landslides are a significant natural hazard for the people of the District. In February 2010, for example, over 15 people were killed in a large landslide in the Ciwidey area.

Industry
Various local manufacturing activities take place in the District including the following.
 * KPBS, Koperasi Peternakan Bandung Selatan (milk producer) (Pangalengan)
 * Asia Sport (Apparel) (Katapang)
 * Ceres (Chocolate) (Dayeuhkolot)
 * PanAsia Indosyntec (Textiles) (Dayeuhkolot)
 * Polyfin (Cileunyi)
 * PT Mitra Rajawali Banjaran (Condoms) (Banjaran) received the 2010 ASEAN Business Development Award for best quality. The factory produces around 18.7 million condoms a year, 65 percent of which are for export

Sport
Bandung regency has an impressive stadium, the best and well known in West Java Province, it is the Si Jalak Harupat stadium, the home base stadium for Persikab Bandung and Persib Bandung the two football teams from this region. A representative athletic track located in the town of Pangalengan.

Cuisine
This area has a unique cuisine, such as Milk Caramels (in Pangalengan), Fresh Milk (in Pangalengan), Milk Snack (in Pangalengan), Bandrek (in Ciwidey), Borondong (in Majalaya)

Transport
Transport to the Bandung Regency mainly is from Bandung. No major bus terminals, train stations or airports are located in the region. Traditional transport arrangements such as the delman horse passenger carriages are found in such places as the Banjaran Sub- district.

Nagreg Ring Road
To ease traffic jams in the Nagreg hill area close to Bandung, in 2011 the government completed part of the Nagreg ring road (5.4 km in length, 10 degrees in steepness, with a 400 meters semi-tunnel) at a cost of Rp.90 billion (around $US 10.6 million). The ring road will serve vehicles from travelling from south to north and can be used during Eid ul-Fitr 2011. Traffic from north to south will still use the old road.

title: Bandung Regency


text: User talk:68.37.60.151

title: User talk:68.37.60.151


text: Category:California Institute of Technology


text:
Toussaint Dubreuil

Toussaint Dubreuil (c. 1561 – 22 November 1602) was a French painter associated (from 1594) with the second School of Fontainebleau (together with the artists Martin Fréminet and Ambroise Dubois) and Italianism, a transitional art style.

Dubreuil was born in Paris. His works in the late Mannerist style, many of which have been lost, continue in the use of highly elongated and undulating forms and crowded compositions reminiscent of the work of Francesco Primaticcio (c. 1505–1570). Many of Dubreuil's subjects include mythological scenes and scenes from works of fiction by such writers as the Italian Torquato Tasso, the ancient Greek novelist Heliodorus of Emesa and French poet Pierre de Ronsard.

title: Toussaint Dubreuil


text:
List of peers 1310–1319

Peerage of England

 * Earl of Surrey (1088)||John de Warenne, 7th Earl of Surrey||1304||1347||
 * rowspan="2"|Earl of Warwick (1088)||Guy de Beauchamp, 10th Earl of Warwick||1298||1315||Died
 * Thomas de Beauchamp, 11th Earl of Warwick||1315||1369||
 * Earl of Gloucester (1122)||Gilbert de Clare, 8th Earl of Gloucester||1295||1314||Died, title extinct
 * Earl of Arundel (1138)||Edmund FitzAlan, 9th Earl of Arundel||1302||1326||
 * Earl of Oxford (1142)||Robert de Vere, 6th Earl of Oxford||1297||1331||
 * rowspan="2"|Earl of Salisbury (1145)||Margaret Longespée, 4th Countess of Salisbury||1261||1310||
 * Alice de Lacy, 5th Countess of Salisbury||1310||1322||
 * Earl of Hereford (1199)||Humphrey de Bohun, 4th Earl of Hereford||1298||1322||
 * rowspan="2"|Earl of Lincoln (1217)||Henry de Lacy, 3rd Earl of Lincoln||1266||1311||Died
 * Alice de Lacy, 4th Countess of Lincoln||1311||1348||
 * Earl of Pembroke (1247)||Aymer de Valence, 2nd Earl of Pembroke||1296||1324||
 * Earl of Leicester (1265)||Thomas Plantagenet, 2nd Earl of Leicester and Lancaster||1296||1322||
 * Earl of Richmond (1306)||John of Brittany, Earl of Richmond||1306||1334||
 * Earl of Cornwall (1307)||Piers Gaveston, 1st Earl of Cornwall||1307||1312||Died, title extinct
 * Earl of Norfolk (1312)||Thomas of Brotherton, 1st Earl of Norfolk||1312||1338||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron de Ros (1264)||William de Ros, 1st Baron de Ros||1285||1316||Died
 * William de Ros, 2nd Baron de Ros||1216||1342||
 * Baron le Despencer (1264)||Hugh le Despencer, 2nd Baron le Despencer||1265||1326||
 * Baron Basset of Drayton (1264)||Ralph Basset, 2nd Baron Basset of Drayton||1299||1343||
 * Baron Basset of Sapcote (1264)||Ralph Basset, 3rd baron Basset of Sapcote||1300||1326||Never summoned to Parliament
 * Baron Mowbray (1283)||John de Mowbray, 2nd Baron Mowbray||1297||1322||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Hastings (1290)||John Hastings, 1st Baron Hastings||1290||1313||Died
 * John Hastings, 2nd Baron Hastings||1313||1325||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Astley (1295)||Nicholas de Astley, 2nd Baron Astley||1301||1314||Died
 * Thomas de Astley, 3rd Baron Astley||1314||1359||
 * Baron Berkeley (1295)||Thomas de Berkeley, 1st Baron Berkeley||1295||1321||
 * Baron Boteler (1295)||William le Boteler, 1st Baron Boteler||1295||1328||
 * Baron Canville (1295)||William de Canville, 2nd Baron Canville||1308||1338||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Clavering (1295)||Robert FitzRoger, 1st Baron Clavering||1295||1310||Died
 * John de Clavering, 2nd Baron Clavering||1310||1332||
 * Baron Corbet (1295)||Piers Corbet, 2nd Baron Corbet||1300||1322||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Fauconberg (1295)||Walter de Fauconberg, 2nd Baron Fauconberg||1304||1318||Died
 * John de Fauconberg, 3rd Baron Fauconberg||1318||1349||
 * Baron FitzWalter (1295)||Robert FitzWalter, 1st Baron FitzWalter||1295||1325||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron FitzWarine (1295)||Fulke FitzWarine, 1st Baron FitzWarine||1295||1315||Died
 * Fulke FitzWarine, 2nd Baron FitzWarine||1315||1349||
 * rowspan="3"|Baron FitzWilliam (1295)||Ralph FitzWilliam, 1st Baron FitzWilliam||1295||1315||Died
 * Robert FitzWilliam, 2nd Baron FitzWilliam||1315||1317||
 * Ralph FitzWilliam, 3rd Baron FitzWilliam||1317||1321||
 * Baron Giffard (1295)||John Giffard, 2nd Baron Giffard||1299||1322||
 * Baron Grey de Wilton (1295)||John Grey, 2nd Baron Grey de Wilton||1308||1323||
 * Baron Huntercombe (1295)||Walter de Huntercombe, 1st Baron Huntercombe||1295||1312||Died, title extinct
 * Baron Hussee (1295)||Henry Hussee, 1st Baron Hussee||1295||1332||
 * Baron Hylton (1295)||Robert Hylton, 1st Baron Hylton||1295||1322||
 * Baron Knovill (1295)||Bogo de Knovill, 2nd Baron Knovill||1306||1338||
 * Baron Kyme (1295)||Philip de Kyme, 1st Baron Kyme||1295||1323||
 * Baron Martin (1295)||William Martin, 1st Baron Martin||1295||1325||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Mauley (1295)||Peter de Mauley, 1st Baron Mauley||1295||1310||Died
 * Peter de Mauley, 2nd Baron Mauley||1310||1355||
 * Baron Meinill (1295)||Nicholas Meinill, 2nd Baron Meinill||1299||1322||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Montfort (1295)||John de Montfort, 2nd Baron Montfort||1296||1314||Died
 * Peter de Montfort, 3rd Baron Montfort||1314||1367||
 * Baron Mortimer of Wigmore (1295)||Roger de Mortimer, 2nd Baron Mortimer de Wigmore||1304||1330||
 * Baron Neville de Raby (1295)||Ralph Neville, 1st Baron Neville de Raby||1295||1331||
 * Baron Plugenet (1295)||Alan de Plugenet, 2nd Baron Plugenet||1299||1326||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Poyntz (1295)||Nicholas Poyntz, 2nd Baron Poyntz||1308||1311||Died
 * Hugh Poyntz, 3rd Baron Poyntz||1311||1333||
 * Baron Segrave (1295)||John de Segrave, 2nd Baron Segrave||1295||1325||
 * Baron Segrave of Barton Segrave (1295)||Nicholas de Segrave, 1st Baron Segrave of Barton Segrave||1295||1322||
 * Baron Strange (1295)||Roger Le Strange, 1st Baron Strange||1295||1311||Died, Barony became dormant
 * Baron Umfraville (1295)||Robert de Umfraville, 2nd Baron Umfraville||1307||1325||
 * Baron Verdun (1295)||Theobald de Verdun, 2nd Baron Verdun||1309||1316||Died, Barony fell into abeyance
 * Baron Wake (1295)||John Wake, 1st Baron Wake||1300||1349||
 * Baron Ap-Adam (1299)||John Ap-Adam, 1st Baron Ap-Adam||1299||1311||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Bardolf (1299)||Thomas Bardolf, 2nd Baron Bardolf||1304||1328||
 * Baron Basset of Weldon (1299)||Richard Basset, 1st Baron Basset of Weldon||1299||1314||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Braose (1299)||William de Braose, 2nd Baron Braose||1299||1326||Died, Barony fell into abeyance
 * Baron Chaurces (1299)||Thomas de Chaurces, 1st Baron Chaurces||1299||1315||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Clinton (1299)||John de Clinton, 1st Baron Clinton||1299||1310||Died
 * John de Clinton, 2nd Baron Clinton||1310||1335||
 * Baron de la Mare (1299)||John De La Mare, 1st Baron de la Mare||1299||1316||Died, title extinct
 * Baron De La Warr (1299)||Roger la Warr, 1st Baron De La Warr||1299||1320||
 * Baron Deincourt (1299)||Edmund Deincourt, 1st Baron Deincourt||1299||1327||
 * Baron Devereux (1299)||William Devereux, 1st Baron Devereux||1299||1330?||
 * Baron Engaine (1299)||John Engaine, 1st Baron Engaine||1299||1322||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Ferrers of Chartley (1299)||John de Ferrers, 1st Baron Ferrers of Chartley||1299||1312||Died
 * John de Ferrers, 2nd Baron Ferrers of Chartley||1312||c1324||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron FitzPayne (1299)||Robert FitzPayne, 1st Baron FitzPayne||1299||1316||Died
 * Robert FitzPayne, 2nd Baron FitzPayne||1316||1354||
 * Baron Grandison (1299)||William de Grandison, 1st Baron Grandison||1299||1335||
 * Baron Havering (1299)||John de Havering, 1st Baron Havering||1299||1329||
 * Baron Lancaster (1299)||Henry Plantagenet, 1st Baron Lancaster||1299||1345||
 * Baron Leyburn (1299)||William de Leyburn, 1st Baron Leyburn||1299||1310||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * rowspan="3"|Baron Lovel (1299)||John Lovel, 1st Baron Lovel||1299||1311||Died
 * John Lovel, 2nd Baron Lovel||1311||1314||
 * John Lovel, 3rd Baron Lovel||1314||1347||
 * Baron Moels (1299)||Nicholas de Moels, 2nd Baron Moels||1309||1315||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Mohun (1299)||John de Mohun, 1st Baron Mohun||1299||1330||
 * Baron Mortimer of Chirke (1299)||Roger de Mortimer, 1st Baron Mortimer of Chirke||1299||1336||
 * Baron Multon of Egremont (1299)||Thomas de Multon, 1st Baron Multon of Egremont||1299||1322||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Percy (1299)||Henry de Percy, 1st Baron Percy||1299||1315||Died
 * Henry de Percy, 2nd Baron Percy||1315||1352||
 * Baron Peyvre (1299)||Johny Peyvre, 1st Baron Peyvre||1299||1316||Died; Barony probably terminated
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Rivers of Ongar (1299)||John Rivers, 1st Baron Rivers||1299||1311||Died
 * John Rivers, 2nd Baron Rivers||1311||1350||
 * Baron Saint Amand (1299)||Almaric de St Amand, 1st Baron Saint Amand||1299||1310||Died, Barony extinct
 * Baron Scales (1299)||Robert de Scales, 2nd Baron Scales||1305||1324||
 * Baron Stafford (1299)||Ralph de Stafford, 2nd Baron Stafford||1309||1372||
 * Baron Tregoz (1299)||Henry de Tregoz, 2nd Baron Tregoz||1305||1322||
 * Baron Teyes (1299)||Henry de Teyes, 2nd Baron Teyes||1308||1321||
 * Baron Valence (1299)||Aymer de Valence, 1st Baron Valence||1299||1323||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Vavasour (1299)||William de Vavasour, 1st Baron Vavasour||1299||1313||Died
 * Walter de Vavasour, 2nd Baron Vavasour||1313||1325||
 * Baron Vere (1299)||Hugh de Vere, 1st Baron Vere||1299||1318||Died, Barony extinct
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Welles (1299)||Adam de Welles, 1st Baron Welles||1299||1311||Died
 * Robert de Welles, 2nd Baron Welles||1311||1320||
 * Baron Zouche (1299)||Alan La Zouche, 1st Baron Zouche||1299||1314||Died, Barony fell into abeyance
 * Baron Toni (1299)||Robert de Toni, 1st Baron Toni||1299||1310||Died, Barony extinct
 * Baron Beauchamp of Somerset (1299)||John de Beauchamp, 1st Baron Beauchamp||1299||1336||
 * Baron Cauntelo (1299)||William de Cauntelo, 2nd Baron Cauntelo||1308||1321||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron de Clifford (1299)||Robert de Clifford, 1st Baron de Clifford||1299||1314||Died
 * Roger de Clifford, 2nd Baron de Clifford||1314||1322||
 * Baron Darcy (1299)||Philip Darcy, Baron Darcy||1299||1332||
 * Baron De La Ward (1299)||Simon de La Ward, 2nd Baron De La Ward||1307||1324||
 * Baron Ferrers of Groby (1299)||William Ferrers, 1st Baron Ferrers of Groby||1299||1325||
 * Baron FitzReginald (1299)||John FitzReginald, 1st Baron FitzReginald||1299||1310||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Furnivall (1299)||Thomas de Furnivall, 1st Baron Furnivall||1299||1332||
 * Baron Grendon (1299)||Ralph Grendon, 1st Baron Grendon||1299||1331||
 * Baron Hastings of Inchmahome (1299)||Edmund Hastings, 1st Baron Hastings of Inchmahome||1299||1314||Died, title extinct
 * Baron Lancaster (1299)||John de Lancastre, 1st Baron Lancaster||1299||1334||
 * Baron Latimer (1299)||Thomas Latimer, 1st Baron Latimer||1299||1334||
 * Baron Latimer (1299)||William Latimer, 2nd Baron Latimer||1305||1327||
 * Baron Lisle (1299)|| John de Lisle, 2nd Baron Lisle ||1304||1337||
 * rowspan="3"|Baron Montagu (1299)||Simon de Montacute, 1st Baron Montagu||1299||1316||Died
 * William de Montacute, 2nd Baron Montagu||1316||1319||Died
 * William de Montacute, 3rd Baron Montagu||1319||1344||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Morley (1299)||William de Morley||1299||1310||Died
 * Robert de Morley, 2nd Baron Morley||1310||1360||
 * Baron Paynel (1299)||John Paynel, 1st Baron Paynel||1299||1318||Died
 * Baron Pecche (1299)||Gilbert Peche||1299||1322||
 * Baron Rithre (1299)||William de Rithre, 1st Baron Rithre||1299||1310||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Roche (1299)||Thomas de la Roche, 1st Baron Roche||1299||1320||
 * Baron Saint John of Basing (1299)||John St John, 1st Baron Saint John of Basing||1299||1329||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Saint John of Lageham (1299)||John St John, 1st Baron Saint John of Lageham||1299||1317||Died
 * John St John, 2nd Baron Saint John of Lageham||1317||1323||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Strange of Knockyn (1299)||John le Strange, 2nd Baron Strange of Knockyn||1309||1311||Died
 * John le Strange, 3rd Baron Strange of Knockyn||1311||1324||
 * Baron Sudeley (1299)||John de Sudeley, 1st Baron Sudeley||1299||1336||
 * Baron Balliol (1300)||Alexander de Balliol, 1st Baron Balliol||1300||c. 1311||Attainted and his honours became forfeited
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Paynel (1303)||William Paynel, 1st Baron Paynel||1303||1317||Died
 * John Paynel, 2nd Baron Paynel||1317||1319||Died
 * Baron Botetourt (1305)||John de Botetourt, 1st Baron Botetourt||1305||1324||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Multon of Gilsland (1307)||Thomas de Multon, 1st Baron Multon of Gilsland||1307||1313||Died
 * John de Multon, 2nd Baron Multon of Gilsland||1313||1334||
 * Baron Thweng (1307)||Marmaduke de Thweng, 1st Baron Thweng||1307||1323||
 * Baron Boteler of Wemme (1308)||William Le Boteler, 1st Baron Boteler of Wemme||1308||1334||
 * Baron Cromwell (1308)||John de Cromwell, 1st Baron Cromwell||1308||1335||
 * Baron Grelle (1308)||Thomas de Grelle, 1st Baron Grelle||1308||1347||
 * Baron Somery (1308)||John de Somery, 1st Baron Somery||1308||1321||
 * Baron Zouche of Haryngworth (1308)||William la Zouche, 1st Baron Zouche||1308||1352||
 * Baron Marshal (1309)||William Marshal, 1st Baron Marshal||1309||1314||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Ufford (1309)||Robert de Ufford, 1st Baron Ufford||1309||1316||Died
 * Robert de Ufford, 2nd Baron Ufford||1316||1369||
 * Baron Beaumont (1309)||Henry Beaumont, 1st Baron Beaumont||1309||1340||
 * Baron Cailly (1309)||Thomas de Cailly, 1st Baron Cailly||1309||1317||Died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Everingham (1309)||Adam Everingham, 1st Baron Everingham||1309||1341||
 * Baron FitzHenry (1309)||Aucher FitzHenry, 1st Baron FitzHenry||1309||1339||
 * Baron Gorges (1309)||Ralph de Gorges, 1st Baron Gorges||1309||1324||
 * Baron Monthermer (1309)||Ralph de Monthermer, 1st Baron Monthermer||1309||1325||
 * Baron Orreby (1309)||John de Orreby, 1st Baron Orreby||1309||1318||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Strange of Blackmere (1309)||Fulk le Strange, 1st Baron Strange of Blackmere||1309||1324||
 * Baron Thorpe (1309)||John de Thorpe, 1st Baron Thorpe||1309||1325||
 * Baron Badlesmere (1309)||Bartholomew de Badlesmere, 1st Baron Badlesmere||1309||1322||
 * Baron Clare (1309)||Richard de Clare, 1st Baron Clare||1309||1318||Died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Burnell (1311)||Edward Burnell, 1st Baron Burnell||1311||1315||New creation, died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Echingham (1311)||William de Echingham, 1st Baron Echingham||1311||1326||New creation
 * Baron Hastang (1311)||Robert Hastang, 1st Baron Hastang||1311||c. 1320||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Lisle (1311)||Robert de Lisle, 1st Baron Lisle||1311||1343||New creation
 * Baron Nevill (1311)||Hugh de Nevill, 1st Baron Nevill||1311||1336||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Audley of Heleigh (1313)||Nicholas de Audley, 1st Baron Audley of Heleigh||1313||1316||New creation, died
 * James de Audley, 2nd Baron Audley of Heleigh||1316||1386||
 * Baron Bavent (1313)||Roger Bavent, 1st Baron Bavent||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Brun (1313)||Maurice le Brun, 1st Baron Brun||1313||1355||New creation
 * Baron Cobham of Kent (1313)||Henry de Cobham, 1st Baron Cobham of Kent||1313||1339||New creation
 * Baron Felton (1313)||Robert de Felton, 1st Baron Felton||1313||1314||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron FitzBernard (1313)||Thomas Fitzbernard, 1st Baron Fitzbernard||1313||Bef. 1334||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Northwode (1313)||John de Northwode, 1st Baron Northwode||1313||1319||New creation, died
 * Roger de Northwode, 2nd Baron Northwode||1319||1361||
 * Baron Stapleton (1313)||Miles Stapleton, 1st Baron Stapleton||1313||1314||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Vesci (1313)||William de Vesci, 1st Baron Vesci||1313||1314||New creation; died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Saint Amand (1313)||John de St Amand, 1st Baron Saint Amand||1313||1330||New creation
 * Baron Cherleton (1313)||John Cherleton, 1st Baron Cherleton||1313||1353||New creation
 * Baron Marmion (1313)||John Marmion, 1st Baron Marmion||1313||1323||New creation
 * Baron Say (1313)||Geoffrey de Say, 1st Baron Say||1313||1322||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Willoughby de Eresby (1313)||Robert de Willoughby, 1st Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1313||1317||New creation; died
 * John de Willoughby, 2nd Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1317||1349||
 * Baron Saint Maur (1313)||Nicholas St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maur||1313||1317||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Camoys (1313)||Ralph de Camoys, 1st Baron Camoys||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Columbers (1314)||Philip de Columbers, 1st Baron Columbers||1314||1342||New creation
 * Baron le Despencer (1314)||Hugh Despencer, 1st Lord Despencer||1314||1326||New creation
 * Baron Holand (1314)||Robert de Holland, 1st Baron Holand||1314||1328||New creation
 * Baron Audley (1317)||Hugh de Audley, 1st Baron Audley||1317||1347||New creation
 * Baron D'Amorie (1317)||Roger D'Amorie, 1st Baron D'Amorie||1317||1322||New creation
 * Baron Plaiz (1317)||Richard de Playz, 1st Baron Playz||1317||1327||New creation
 * Baron Saint Maur (1317)||William de St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maru||1317||1322||New creation
 * }
 * Baron Tregoz (1299)||Henry de Tregoz, 2nd Baron Tregoz||1305||1322||
 * Baron Teyes (1299)||Henry de Teyes, 2nd Baron Teyes||1308||1321||
 * Baron Valence (1299)||Aymer de Valence, 1st Baron Valence||1299||1323||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Vavasour (1299)||William de Vavasour, 1st Baron Vavasour||1299||1313||Died
 * Walter de Vavasour, 2nd Baron Vavasour||1313||1325||
 * Baron Vere (1299)||Hugh de Vere, 1st Baron Vere||1299||1318||Died, Barony extinct
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Welles (1299)||Adam de Welles, 1st Baron Welles||1299||1311||Died
 * Robert de Welles, 2nd Baron Welles||1311||1320||
 * Baron Zouche (1299)||Alan La Zouche, 1st Baron Zouche||1299||1314||Died, Barony fell into abeyance
 * Baron Toni (1299)||Robert de Toni, 1st Baron Toni||1299||1310||Died, Barony extinct
 * Baron Beauchamp of Somerset (1299)||John de Beauchamp, 1st Baron Beauchamp||1299||1336||
 * Baron Cauntelo (1299)||William de Cauntelo, 2nd Baron Cauntelo||1308||1321||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron de Clifford (1299)||Robert de Clifford, 1st Baron de Clifford||1299||1314||Died
 * Roger de Clifford, 2nd Baron de Clifford||1314||1322||
 * Baron Darcy (1299)||Philip Darcy, Baron Darcy||1299||1332||
 * Baron De La Ward (1299)||Simon de La Ward, 2nd Baron De La Ward||1307||1324||
 * Baron Ferrers of Groby (1299)||William Ferrers, 1st Baron Ferrers of Groby||1299||1325||
 * Baron FitzReginald (1299)||John FitzReginald, 1st Baron FitzReginald||1299||1310||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Furnivall (1299)||Thomas de Furnivall, 1st Baron Furnivall||1299||1332||
 * Baron Grendon (1299)||Ralph Grendon, 1st Baron Grendon||1299||1331||
 * Baron Hastings of Inchmahome (1299)||Edmund Hastings, 1st Baron Hastings of Inchmahome||1299||1314||Died, title extinct
 * Baron Lancaster (1299)||John de Lancastre, 1st Baron Lancaster||1299||1334||
 * Baron Latimer (1299)||Thomas Latimer, 1st Baron Latimer||1299||1334||
 * Baron Latimer (1299)||William Latimer, 2nd Baron Latimer||1305||1327||
 * Baron Lisle (1299)|| John de Lisle, 2nd Baron Lisle ||1304||1337||
 * rowspan="3"|Baron Montagu (1299)||Simon de Montacute, 1st Baron Montagu||1299||1316||Died
 * William de Montacute, 2nd Baron Montagu||1316||1319||Died
 * William de Montacute, 3rd Baron Montagu||1319||1344||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Morley (1299)||William de Morley||1299||1310||Died
 * Robert de Morley, 2nd Baron Morley||1310||1360||
 * Baron Paynel (1299)||John Paynel, 1st Baron Paynel||1299||1318||Died
 * Baron Pecche (1299)||Gilbert Peche||1299||1322||
 * Baron Rithre (1299)||William de Rithre, 1st Baron Rithre||1299||1310||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Roche (1299)||Thomas de la Roche, 1st Baron Roche||1299||1320||
 * Baron Saint John of Basing (1299)||John St John, 1st Baron Saint John of Basing||1299||1329||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Saint John of Lageham (1299)||John St John, 1st Baron Saint John of Lageham||1299||1317||Died
 * John St John, 2nd Baron Saint John of Lageham||1317||1323||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Strange of Knockyn (1299)||John le Strange, 2nd Baron Strange of Knockyn||1309||1311||Died
 * John le Strange, 3rd Baron Strange of Knockyn||1311||1324||
 * Baron Sudeley (1299)||John de Sudeley, 1st Baron Sudeley||1299||1336||
 * Baron Balliol (1300)||Alexander de Balliol, 1st Baron Balliol||1300||c. 1311||Attainted and his honours became forfeited
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Paynel (1303)||William Paynel, 1st Baron Paynel||1303||1317||Died
 * John Paynel, 2nd Baron Paynel||1317||1319||Died
 * Baron Botetourt (1305)||John de Botetourt, 1st Baron Botetourt||1305||1324||
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Multon of Gilsland (1307)||Thomas de Multon, 1st Baron Multon of Gilsland||1307||1313||Died
 * John de Multon, 2nd Baron Multon of Gilsland||1313||1334||
 * Baron Thweng (1307)||Marmaduke de Thweng, 1st Baron Thweng||1307||1323||
 * Baron Boteler of Wemme (1308)||William Le Boteler, 1st Baron Boteler of Wemme||1308||1334||
 * Baron Cromwell (1308)||John de Cromwell, 1st Baron Cromwell||1308||1335||
 * Baron Grelle (1308)||Thomas de Grelle, 1st Baron Grelle||1308||1347||
 * Baron Somery (1308)||John de Somery, 1st Baron Somery||1308||1321||
 * Baron Zouche of Haryngworth (1308)||William la Zouche, 1st Baron Zouche||1308||1352||
 * Baron Marshal (1309)||William Marshal, 1st Baron Marshal||1309||1314||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Ufford (1309)||Robert de Ufford, 1st Baron Ufford||1309||1316||Died
 * Robert de Ufford, 2nd Baron Ufford||1316||1369||
 * Baron Beaumont (1309)||Henry Beaumont, 1st Baron Beaumont||1309||1340||
 * Baron Cailly (1309)||Thomas de Cailly, 1st Baron Cailly||1309||1317||Died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Everingham (1309)||Adam Everingham, 1st Baron Everingham||1309||1341||
 * Baron FitzHenry (1309)||Aucher FitzHenry, 1st Baron FitzHenry||1309||1339||
 * Baron Gorges (1309)||Ralph de Gorges, 1st Baron Gorges||1309||1324||
 * Baron Monthermer (1309)||Ralph de Monthermer, 1st Baron Monthermer||1309||1325||
 * Baron Orreby (1309)||John de Orreby, 1st Baron Orreby||1309||1318||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Strange of Blackmere (1309)||Fulk le Strange, 1st Baron Strange of Blackmere||1309||1324||
 * Baron Thorpe (1309)||John de Thorpe, 1st Baron Thorpe||1309||1325||
 * Baron Badlesmere (1309)||Bartholomew de Badlesmere, 1st Baron Badlesmere||1309||1322||
 * Baron Clare (1309)||Richard de Clare, 1st Baron Clare||1309||1318||Died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Burnell (1311)||Edward Burnell, 1st Baron Burnell||1311||1315||New creation, died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Echingham (1311)||William de Echingham, 1st Baron Echingham||1311||1326||New creation
 * Baron Hastang (1311)||Robert Hastang, 1st Baron Hastang||1311||c. 1320||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Lisle (1311)||Robert de Lisle, 1st Baron Lisle||1311||1343||New creation
 * Baron Nevill (1311)||Hugh de Nevill, 1st Baron Nevill||1311||1336||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Audley of Heleigh (1313)||Nicholas de Audley, 1st Baron Audley of Heleigh||1313||1316||New creation, died
 * James de Audley, 2nd Baron Audley of Heleigh||1316||1386||
 * Baron Bavent (1313)||Roger Bavent, 1st Baron Bavent||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Brun (1313)||Maurice le Brun, 1st Baron Brun||1313||1355||New creation
 * Baron Cobham of Kent (1313)||Henry de Cobham, 1st Baron Cobham of Kent||1313||1339||New creation
 * Baron Felton (1313)||Robert de Felton, 1st Baron Felton||1313||1314||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron FitzBernard (1313)||Thomas Fitzbernard, 1st Baron Fitzbernard||1313||Bef. 1334||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Northwode (1313)||John de Northwode, 1st Baron Northwode||1313||1319||New creation, died
 * Roger de Northwode, 2nd Baron Northwode||1319||1361||
 * Baron Stapleton (1313)||Miles Stapleton, 1st Baron Stapleton||1313||1314||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Vesci (1313)||William de Vesci, 1st Baron Vesci||1313||1314||New creation; died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Saint Amand (1313)||John de St Amand, 1st Baron Saint Amand||1313||1330||New creation
 * Baron Cherleton (1313)||John Cherleton, 1st Baron Cherleton||1313||1353||New creation
 * Baron Marmion (1313)||John Marmion, 1st Baron Marmion||1313||1323||New creation
 * Baron Say (1313)||Geoffrey de Say, 1st Baron Say||1313||1322||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Willoughby de Eresby (1313)||Robert de Willoughby, 1st Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1313||1317||New creation; died
 * John de Willoughby, 2nd Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1317||1349||
 * Baron Saint Maur (1313)||Nicholas St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maur||1313||1317||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Camoys (1313)||Ralph de Camoys, 1st Baron Camoys||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Columbers (1314)||Philip de Columbers, 1st Baron Columbers||1314||1342||New creation
 * Baron le Despencer (1314)||Hugh Despencer, 1st Lord Despencer||1314||1326||New creation
 * Baron Holand (1314)||Robert de Holland, 1st Baron Holand||1314||1328||New creation
 * Baron Audley (1317)||Hugh de Audley, 1st Baron Audley||1317||1347||New creation
 * Baron D'Amorie (1317)||Roger D'Amorie, 1st Baron D'Amorie||1317||1322||New creation
 * Baron Plaiz (1317)||Richard de Playz, 1st Baron Playz||1317||1327||New creation
 * Baron Saint Maur (1317)||William de St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maru||1317||1322||New creation
 * }
 * Baron Grelle (1308)||Thomas de Grelle, 1st Baron Grelle||1308||1347||
 * Baron Somery (1308)||John de Somery, 1st Baron Somery||1308||1321||
 * Baron Zouche of Haryngworth (1308)||William la Zouche, 1st Baron Zouche||1308||1352||
 * Baron Marshal (1309)||William Marshal, 1st Baron Marshal||1309||1314||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Ufford (1309)||Robert de Ufford, 1st Baron Ufford||1309||1316||Died
 * Robert de Ufford, 2nd Baron Ufford||1316||1369||
 * Baron Beaumont (1309)||Henry Beaumont, 1st Baron Beaumont||1309||1340||
 * Baron Cailly (1309)||Thomas de Cailly, 1st Baron Cailly||1309||1317||Died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Everingham (1309)||Adam Everingham, 1st Baron Everingham||1309||1341||
 * Baron FitzHenry (1309)||Aucher FitzHenry, 1st Baron FitzHenry||1309||1339||
 * Baron Gorges (1309)||Ralph de Gorges, 1st Baron Gorges||1309||1324||
 * Baron Monthermer (1309)||Ralph de Monthermer, 1st Baron Monthermer||1309||1325||
 * Baron Orreby (1309)||John de Orreby, 1st Baron Orreby||1309||1318||Died; none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Strange of Blackmere (1309)||Fulk le Strange, 1st Baron Strange of Blackmere||1309||1324||
 * Baron Thorpe (1309)||John de Thorpe, 1st Baron Thorpe||1309||1325||
 * Baron Badlesmere (1309)||Bartholomew de Badlesmere, 1st Baron Badlesmere||1309||1322||
 * Baron Clare (1309)||Richard de Clare, 1st Baron Clare||1309||1318||Died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Burnell (1311)||Edward Burnell, 1st Baron Burnell||1311||1315||New creation, died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Echingham (1311)||William de Echingham, 1st Baron Echingham||1311||1326||New creation
 * Baron Hastang (1311)||Robert Hastang, 1st Baron Hastang||1311||c. 1320||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Lisle (1311)||Robert de Lisle, 1st Baron Lisle||1311||1343||New creation
 * Baron Nevill (1311)||Hugh de Nevill, 1st Baron Nevill||1311||1336||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Audley of Heleigh (1313)||Nicholas de Audley, 1st Baron Audley of Heleigh||1313||1316||New creation, died
 * James de Audley, 2nd Baron Audley of Heleigh||1316||1386||
 * Baron Bavent (1313)||Roger Bavent, 1st Baron Bavent||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Brun (1313)||Maurice le Brun, 1st Baron Brun||1313||1355||New creation
 * Baron Cobham of Kent (1313)||Henry de Cobham, 1st Baron Cobham of Kent||1313||1339||New creation
 * Baron Felton (1313)||Robert de Felton, 1st Baron Felton||1313||1314||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron FitzBernard (1313)||Thomas Fitzbernard, 1st Baron Fitzbernard||1313||Bef. 1334||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Northwode (1313)||John de Northwode, 1st Baron Northwode||1313||1319||New creation, died
 * Roger de Northwode, 2nd Baron Northwode||1319||1361||
 * Baron Stapleton (1313)||Miles Stapleton, 1st Baron Stapleton||1313||1314||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Vesci (1313)||William de Vesci, 1st Baron Vesci||1313||1314||New creation; died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Saint Amand (1313)||John de St Amand, 1st Baron Saint Amand||1313||1330||New creation
 * Baron Cherleton (1313)||John Cherleton, 1st Baron Cherleton||1313||1353||New creation
 * Baron Marmion (1313)||John Marmion, 1st Baron Marmion||1313||1323||New creation
 * Baron Say (1313)||Geoffrey de Say, 1st Baron Say||1313||1322||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Willoughby de Eresby (1313)||Robert de Willoughby, 1st Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1313||1317||New creation; died
 * John de Willoughby, 2nd Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1317||1349||
 * Baron Saint Maur (1313)||Nicholas St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maur||1313||1317||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Camoys (1313)||Ralph de Camoys, 1st Baron Camoys||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Columbers (1314)||Philip de Columbers, 1st Baron Columbers||1314||1342||New creation
 * Baron le Despencer (1314)||Hugh Despencer, 1st Lord Despencer||1314||1326||New creation
 * Baron Holand (1314)||Robert de Holland, 1st Baron Holand||1314||1328||New creation
 * Baron Audley (1317)||Hugh de Audley, 1st Baron Audley||1317||1347||New creation
 * Baron D'Amorie (1317)||Roger D'Amorie, 1st Baron D'Amorie||1317||1322||New creation
 * Baron Plaiz (1317)||Richard de Playz, 1st Baron Playz||1317||1327||New creation
 * Baron Saint Maur (1317)||William de St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maru||1317||1322||New creation
 * }
 * Baron Bavent (1313)||Roger Bavent, 1st Baron Bavent||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Brun (1313)||Maurice le Brun, 1st Baron Brun||1313||1355||New creation
 * Baron Cobham of Kent (1313)||Henry de Cobham, 1st Baron Cobham of Kent||1313||1339||New creation
 * Baron Felton (1313)||Robert de Felton, 1st Baron Felton||1313||1314||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron FitzBernard (1313)||Thomas Fitzbernard, 1st Baron Fitzbernard||1313||Bef. 1334||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Northwode (1313)||John de Northwode, 1st Baron Northwode||1313||1319||New creation, died
 * Roger de Northwode, 2nd Baron Northwode||1319||1361||
 * Baron Stapleton (1313)||Miles Stapleton, 1st Baron Stapleton||1313||1314||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Vesci (1313)||William de Vesci, 1st Baron Vesci||1313||1314||New creation; died, Barony became extinct
 * Baron Saint Amand (1313)||John de St Amand, 1st Baron Saint Amand||1313||1330||New creation
 * Baron Cherleton (1313)||John Cherleton, 1st Baron Cherleton||1313||1353||New creation
 * Baron Marmion (1313)||John Marmion, 1st Baron Marmion||1313||1323||New creation
 * Baron Say (1313)||Geoffrey de Say, 1st Baron Say||1313||1322||New creation
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Willoughby de Eresby (1313)||Robert de Willoughby, 1st Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1313||1317||New creation; died
 * John de Willoughby, 2nd Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1317||1349||
 * Baron Saint Maur (1313)||Nicholas St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maur||1313||1317||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Camoys (1313)||Ralph de Camoys, 1st Baron Camoys||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Columbers (1314)||Philip de Columbers, 1st Baron Columbers||1314||1342||New creation
 * Baron le Despencer (1314)||Hugh Despencer, 1st Lord Despencer||1314||1326||New creation
 * Baron Holand (1314)||Robert de Holland, 1st Baron Holand||1314||1328||New creation
 * Baron Audley (1317)||Hugh de Audley, 1st Baron Audley||1317||1347||New creation
 * Baron D'Amorie (1317)||Roger D'Amorie, 1st Baron D'Amorie||1317||1322||New creation
 * Baron Plaiz (1317)||Richard de Playz, 1st Baron Playz||1317||1327||New creation
 * Baron Saint Maur (1317)||William de St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maru||1317||1322||New creation
 * }
 * rowspan="2"|Baron Willoughby de Eresby (1313)||Robert de Willoughby, 1st Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1313||1317||New creation; died
 * John de Willoughby, 2nd Baron Willoughby de Eresby||1317||1349||
 * Baron Saint Maur (1313)||Nicholas St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maur||1313||1317||New creation; died, none of his heirs were summoned to Parliament in respect of this Barony
 * Baron Camoys (1313)||Ralph de Camoys, 1st Baron Camoys||1313||1335||New creation
 * Baron Columbers (1314)||Philip de Columbers, 1st Baron Columbers||1314||1342||New creation
 * Baron le Despencer (1314)||Hugh Despencer, 1st Lord Despencer||1314||1326||New creation
 * Baron Holand (1314)||Robert de Holland, 1st Baron Holand||1314||1328||New creation
 * Baron Audley (1317)||Hugh de Audley, 1st Baron Audley||1317||1347||New creation
 * Baron D'Amorie (1317)||Roger D'Amorie, 1st Baron D'Amorie||1317||1322||New creation
 * Baron Plaiz (1317)||Richard de Playz, 1st Baron Playz||1317||1327||New creation
 * Baron Saint Maur (1317)||William de St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maru||1317||1322||New creation
 * }
 * Baron Holand (1314)||Robert de Holland, 1st Baron Holand||1314||1328||New creation
 * Baron Audley (1317)||Hugh de Audley, 1st Baron Audley||1317||1347||New creation
 * Baron D'Amorie (1317)||Roger D'Amorie, 1st Baron D'Amorie||1317||1322||New creation
 * Baron Plaiz (1317)||Richard de Playz, 1st Baron Playz||1317||1327||New creation
 * Baron Saint Maur (1317)||William de St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maru||1317||1322||New creation
 * }
 * Baron Plaiz (1317)||Richard de Playz, 1st Baron Playz||1317||1327||New creation
 * Baron Saint Maur (1317)||William de St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maru||1317||1322||New creation
 * }
 * Baron Saint Maur (1317)||William de St Maur, 1st Baron Saint Maru||1317||1322||New creation
 * }
 * }

Peerage of Scotland

 * Earl of Mar (1114)||Domhnall II, Earl of Mar||1305||1332||
 * Earl of Dunbar (1115)||Patrick V, Earl of March||1308||1368||
 * Earl of Angus (1115)||Robert de Umfraville, Earl of Angus||1307||1314||Title forfeited
 * Earl of Atholl (1115)||David II Strathbogie, Earl of Atholl||1307||1314||Title forfeited
 * rowspan=2|Earl of Strathearn (1115)||Maol Íosa III, Earl of Strathearn||1271||1317||Died
 * Maol Íosa IV, Earl of Strathearn||1317||1329||
 * Earl of Fife (1129)||Donnchadh IV, Earl of Fife||1288||1353||
 * Earl of Menteith (1160)||Muireadhach III, Earl of Menteith||1308||1333||
 * Earl of Lennox (1184)||Maol Choluim II, Earl of Lennox||1291||1333||
 * Earl of Ross (1215)||Uilleam II, Earl of Ross||1274||1333||
 * Earl of Sutherland (1235)||William de Moravia, 3rd Earl of Sutherland||1307||1325||
 * Earl of Moray (1312)||Thomas Randolph, 1st Earl of Moray||1312||1332||New creation
 * Earl of Carrick (1314)||Edward Bruce, Earl of Carrick||1312||1318||New creation; died, and the Earldom reverted to the Crown
 * }
 * Earl of Menteith (1160)||Muireadhach III, Earl of Menteith||1308||1333||
 * Earl of Lennox (1184)||Maol Choluim II, Earl of Lennox||1291||1333||
 * Earl of Ross (1215)||Uilleam II, Earl of Ross||1274||1333||
 * Earl of Sutherland (1235)||William de Moravia, 3rd Earl of Sutherland||1307||1325||
 * Earl of Moray (1312)||Thomas Randolph, 1st Earl of Moray||1312||1332||New creation
 * Earl of Carrick (1314)||Edward Bruce, Earl of Carrick||1312||1318||New creation; died, and the Earldom reverted to the Crown
 * }
 * Earl of Moray (1312)||Thomas Randolph, 1st Earl of Moray||1312||1332||New creation
 * Earl of Carrick (1314)||Edward Bruce, Earl of Carrick||1312||1318||New creation; died, and the Earldom reverted to the Crown
 * }
 * Earl of Carrick (1314)||Edward Bruce, Earl of Carrick||1312||1318||New creation; died, and the Earldom reverted to the Crown
 * }
 * }

Peerage of Ireland

 * Earl of Ulster (1264)||Richard Óg de Burgh, 2nd Earl of Ulster||1271||1326||
 * rowspan=2|Earl of Kildare (1316)||John FitzGerald, 1st Earl of Kildare||1316||1316||New creation; died
 * Thomas FitzGerald, 2nd Earl of Kildare||1316||1328||
 * Earl of Louth (1319)||John de Bermingham, 1st Earl of Louth||1319||1329||New creation
 * Baron Athenry (1172)||Rickard de Bermingham||1307||1322||
 * Baron Kingsale (1223)||Miles de Courcy, 6th Baron Kingsale||1303||1338||
 * Baron Kerry (1223)||Nicholas Fitzmaurice, 3rd Baron Kerry||1303||1324||
 * Baron Barry (1261)||John Barry, 4th Baron Barry||1290||1330||
 * }
 * Baron Kingsale (1223)||Miles de Courcy, 6th Baron Kingsale||1303||1338||
 * Baron Kerry (1223)||Nicholas Fitzmaurice, 3rd Baron Kerry||1303||1324||
 * Baron Barry (1261)||John Barry, 4th Baron Barry||1290||1330||
 * }
 * Baron Barry (1261)||John Barry, 4th Baron Barry||1290||1330||
 * }
 * }
 * }

title: List of peers 1310–1319


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xan Phillips

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted A7 (Geogre deleted "Xan Phillips" (Only says he used to be a videotape editor and now has a podcast: spam + vanity (click here!))) - Mailer Diablo 05:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Xan Phillips
Not notable. 474 Google and zero Alexa. Delete - brenneman (t) (c)  04:24, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Makes no claim to notability. Tagged as nn-bio. --GraemeL (talk) 10:43, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above. --Agamemnon2 10:52, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I note that User:Xanphillips (not entirely new but still very new) was second editor of the page and perhaps was the first, no-one has suggested he might have put up a 'user page' in the mainspace in error/ignorance and suggested he ask for it to be deleted himself. Alf 11:03, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Senator6

PROLIFE TAX STRIKE

Government funds abortion and contraception - e.g. through its employees' group health insurance, etc. This article exposes governmental deception of what the legal definition of a burden on the free exercise of religion is which if known would [1] illegalize governmental funding thereof, and [2] make criminally liable those in government who participated in doing so. In conclusion, taxpayers have the only reasonable certainty to overcome this continuous crime by not paying any taxes at all.

HOW ABORTION WILL BECOME UNCONSTITUTIONAL (in part)
A BURDEN ON THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION under my definition thereof (copyrigthed in 2004 as TXu1-189-653)yet precisely and accrately pursuant to Sherbert v. Verner [374 U.S. 398 (1963)] by the U. S. Supreme Court is created when a religious adherent is coerced to consent to a proposed temptation to violate religion in principle only in order to receive and/or be eligible for benefits and/or employment, both of which are not offensive to religion or else be punished for not doing so by being denied the otherwise available benefits and/or employment in question. The intensity of this temptation is that much stronger when it is always available instead of proposed as above indicated and if always available consequently the religious adherent is entitled the more to the religious freedom in question accordingly. However in both cases the religious freedom is limited only by the government’s showing that the limitation or restriction on religious freedom is the least restrictive means of achieving some compelling state interest. Nevertheless to the contrary the government is prohibited from doing so whenever the proposed temptation to violate religion is in practice instead of in principle only, regardless whatever the intensity is, as above indicated. Yet currently the judicial branches of the Federal and State governments are hiding what the precise and accurate definition of the burden on the free exercise of religion is under the Federal First Amendment to the U. S. Constitution pursuant to Sherbert v. Verner as above indicated. Moreover this is a crime by all judges and lawyers who follow this lie upon the public under 18 U.S.C. 242 and would become a crime to overcome in the public interest which amounts to a real and continuous emergency which is imminent to continue in the future as well! As conduct by the otherwise taxpayer which has a reasonable certainty to overcome this particular crime in question, the non-payment of one's taxes could be legitimized only however if the taxpayer already has within his knowledge at the time his Prolife Tax Strike began that the governments are illegally either [1] paying for abortion and/or contraception per se [2] granting tax-exempt or tax-free status to entities who lobby for, sponsor, refer as a "health" practice, and/or support in any way whatsoever abortion and/or contraception, and/or [3] allowing employers both governmental and private - to sponsor employees’ group health insurance ["GHI"] which includes mandatory coverage for both abortion and/or contraception. As a practical matter even the smallest town or municipality offers GHI benefits to its employees which include coverage for abortion and/or contraception. As such doing so is a crime. I will explain below a portion of what I fully explained in my book titled "HOW ABORTION WILL BECOME UNCONSTITUTIONAL" which I copyrighted last year. [Send a $79.00 donation for each copy request plus $6.00 shipping and handling fee to me Lawrence R. Rosano, P. O. Box 579, Franklin Square, New York 11010]. In my book I fully explain the justification defense applicable under New York State Law yet I am not an attorney however I am a legal researcher. Here's the story: Today the U. S. Supreme Court and all lower courts apply the same judicial rules erroneously to resolve a problem for a petitioner who is prohibited to freely exercise his or her religious beliefs in practice by applying those judicial rules adopted by the U. S. Supreme Court correctly designed to resolve a problem for a petitioner who is prohibited to freely exercise his or her religious beliefs in principle only which was the issue in Sherbert. Subjectively speaking, a real and stronger pressure is required to resist a temptation to violate religion in practice, always available no less, than a mere temptation to violate religion in principle only, where the State and/or Federal government or a private employer would otherwise be prohibited to coerce a religious adherent to violate religion in order to become eligible for the employment and/or benefits in question. By keeping hidden from the public two distinctions why doing so is criminal under 18 U.S.C. 242, the U. S. Supreme Court is laughing behind the backs of Prolifers opposed to governmental funding for abortion and/or contraception. In the following in order to make my point for argument sake I do not oppose abortion and/or contraception per se, yet I do prove that under 1963 case law [Sherbert v. Verner] - which is still upheld today by the U. S. Supreme Court - that I am entitled to oppose the alleged "legality" of the funding thereof. Briefly, the first distinction is between a violation of religion and a temptation to violate religion. Even though the government or a private employer allegedly can tempt a religious adherent to violate religion per se nevertheless that does not mean also a coercion to violate religion exists. Nevertheless a violation against the free exercise of religion clause exists under the Federal First Amendment. On this point, the U. S. Supreme Court held this: "A similar argument was made and rejected in Sherbert, however. It is true that, as in Sherbert, the Indiana law does not compel a violation of conscience. But 'this is only the beginning, not the end, of our inquuiry.' 374 U.S., at 403-404. In a variety of ways we have said that '[a] regulation neutral on its face may, in its application, nonetheless offend the constitutional requirement for governmental neutralaity if it burdens the free exercise of religion'" [at Thomas v. Review Board', 450 U. S. 707, 717 (1981)]. The second distinction is between a temptation to violate religion in practice and a temptation to violate religion in principle only. The former leaves open the possibility of committing sin and possibly be damned into Hell for all eternity while the latter prohibits doing so, although Sherbert v. Verner realized still a religiously offensive conditioning to do so - which moreover I will add weakens the will and darkens the intellect - thereby leaving the religious adherent more susceptible if and when confronted with the former temptation to violate religion in practice. This is also common sense. Now the most common example is this: Group Health Insurance [GHI] coerces the GHI plan member to consent to a temptation to violate religion in practice in order to become eligible to file for and receive GHI benefits which are not offensive to religion. This is unconstitutional, as I will prove below, but important to understand now is that this temptation is not in principle only upon which the Courts' rules-to-resolve are based upon. In Sherbert [at 404, 83 S.Ct., at 1794] the U. S. Supreme Court held this: "For '[i]f the purpose or effect of a law is to impede the observance of one or all religions or is to discriminate invidiously between religions, that law is constitutionally invalid even though the burden may be characterized as being only indirect [emphasis, added].' Braunfeld v. Brown, supra, at 607." In Braunfeld v. Brown [366 U.S. at 606, 81 S.Ct. at 1147 (1961)], the High Court explained "indirect" as follows: "an indirect burden on the free exercise of religion, i.e., legislation which does not make unlawful the religious practice itself." By extension, "indirect" can also mean likewise legislation which does not make legally obligatory the violation of religion. Yet to the contrary asking the Roman Catholic Church to sponsor GHI with mandatory coverage for contraception not only asks the Church to sponsor a violation of the free exercise of religion indirectly but to do so directly as well. And for Prolifers as well not only can a Prolifer file a claim under the free exercise of religion as explained above, but in addition the Prolifer may file a religious discrimination class action claim for his/her employer's coercing Prolifers to directly fund that portion of his/her GHI premium which goes to pay for both abortion and/or contraception through the coverage it provides. Or else on the other hand if a Prolifer refused to do so on the basis of religion that Prolifer would be punished for not doing so by a denial of any GHI plan altogether (all GHI plans of which include abortion and/or contracpetion coverage) on that basis alone thereby able to now raise a religious discrimination claim. In 2004 the California Supreme Court held that GHI which included contraception coverage sponsored by the Roman Catholic Church was constitutional. Yet that Court relied on Sherbert v. Verner to arrive at that erroneous decision. But to the contrary that court applied the judicial rules designed by the U. S. Supreme Court to resolve a controversy regarding a temptation to violate religion in principle only as raised and correctly decided in Sherbert v. Verner, yet erroneously applied that judicial rule to GHI which as I have stated above involves an entirely different claim based on a temptation to violate religion in practice. See Catholic Charities v. The Superior Court, 10 Cal.Rptr.3d 283, 311-312, 32 Cal.4th at 562, 85 P.3d 67. Finally, Congress in 1958 by enacting the Code of Ethics For Government Service (House Concurrent Resolution 175, 2nd Session, 85th Congress) empowered taxpayers to conduct a Prolife Tax Strike by leaving open a possibility under the circumstances to do this: "Every person in government service should put loyalty to his highest moral principles and to country above loyalty to persons, party, or governmental department (e.g. the IRS, added). Uphold the Constitution, … and never be a party to its evasion... Expose corruption wherever detected.. ever conscious that public office is a public trust." Furthermore the Federal Nineth and Tenth Amendments empower taxpayers to take over when their government as here verified above lost its authority to do so. IN CONCLUSION: Based on the above and my book mentioned above consequently, "Why would a Prolifer choose to pay any taxes at all.  == ABOUT ME ==

I’m a non-lawyer, turned legal researcher to vindicate my termination based on religious discrimination by the Federal Government because I opposed the Federal Employees' Group Health Insurance Program [FHB] (i.e., GHI for Federal Employees) including coverage for abortion, contraception and sterilization. Fired on a pretext after only 7 months employed, but really for 7 weeks of insubordination due to this FHB issue, all Courts left me in a catch 22 realizing that this issue is a hot potato. When Prolife attorneys told me that I must wait until the law changed, frustrated I represented myself to find out the basis in "the law" that permitted the government or any employer to coerce me to violate my religion in practice or else be punished for not doing so by a denial of GHI benefits (not offensive to my religion) altogether. To the contrary of Prolife attorneys, as I point out in my book, I not only uncovered how to reverse the decline in religious freedom for the past 42 years, thereby specifically answering my FHB question, but also learned how to legally justify a Prolife Tax Strike and found advantages representing myself in court Pro Se better than if a lawyer did so.

Senator6

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Senator6

A tag has been placed on User:Senator6, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Psychonaut (talk) 14:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Senator6