text:
User talk:Hurricane Devon

 This user, User:, is under copyright probation until January 20, 2007. While this user is under probation: This probation is a voluntary agreement entered into in order to be unblocked. See and  for the user's agreement to these terms. Please contact Mangojuice for any questions.
 * They are strictly prohibited from copyright infringement; any violation should result in immediate blocking.
 * This probation box is to remain in place.
 * Until August 20, 2007, this user is to refrain from starting new articles (other than redirects).
 * Until August 20, 2007, this user is to refrain from uploading any new images.

unblock|I'v leaned my lesson!
 * Knowledge seeker has been notifed of your request. Please do not re-add the unblock template. pschemp | talk 03:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You are still unblocked, but have been caught in the auto block, which has nothing to do with your actions. Please do not remove my previous message, as it is important to anyone who might need to remove the autoblock. I have unblocked again. pschemp | talk 01:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

 * }

Article formatting
Hurricanehink ( talk ) 19:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #1
Number 1, June 4, 2006 The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary of the activities of the WikiProject over the past month and upcoming events over the next month. In addition monthly tropical cyclone activity will be summarized.

You have received this as you are a member of the WikiProject, please add your username in the appropriate section on the mailing list. If you do not add your name to that list, the WikiProject will assume you do not wish to receive future versions of The Hurricane Herald.

Storm of the month Typhoon Chanchu was the first typhoon and first super typhoon of the 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Forming on May 9 over the open western Pacific Ocean, Chanchu moved over the Philippines on the 11th. There, it dropped heavy rainfall, causing mudslides, crop damage, and 41 deaths. It moved into the South China Sea, where it rapidly strengthened to a super typhoon on May 14, one of only two super typhoons recorded in the sea. It turned to the north, weakened, and struck the Fujian province of China as a minimal typhoon on the 17th. The typhoon flooded 192 houses, while heavy rainfall caused deadly mudslides. In China, Chanchu caused at least 25 deaths and $480 million in damage (2006 USD). Elsewhere on its path, strong waves from the typhoon sank eleven Vietnamese ships, killing at least 44 people. In Taiwan, heavy rainfall killed two people, while in Japan, severe waves killed one person and injured another.

Other tropical cyclone activity
 * Tropical Storm Aletta existed in the eastern Pacific Ocean from May 25 to May 29, peaking as a 45 mph tropical storm.

New and improved articles
 * New storm articles include: Typhoon Joan (1970), Hurricane Bonnie (1986), Tropical Storm Matthew (2004), Storm of October 1804, Typhoon Chanchu (2006) and Cyclone Olaf.

 * New non-storm articles include: Tropical cyclone rainfall climatology, Dvorak technique and List of Bangladesh tropical cyclones.

 * New Featured articles: 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, Hurricane Mitch, Hurricane Irene (2005) and Hurricane Claudette (2003)

 * Articles which became A/GA class: Hurricane Katrina (A), Effect of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans (A), Hurricane Felix (1995) (GA), Cyclone Percy (A), Labor Day Hurricane of 1935 (A), List of New Jersey hurricanes (A), Hurricane John (1994) (A), Tropical Storm Isabel (1985) (GA), Tropical Storm Odette (2003) (GA)

New articles and improvements wanted
 * An article is requested on subtropical ridge
 * The current collaboration of the fortnight is Hurricane Gilbert, please help improve this article.
 * Improvements are requested to Indianola Hurricane of 1886, Hurricane Camille and Hurricane Andrew.
 * The WikiProject is likely to submit Hurricane John (1994) and Hurricane Katrina to Featured Article Candidates in the near future, so please help improve them to featured standard.

Member of the month The May member of the month is Tito XD. The WikiProject awards this to him for his brilliant work in improving articles. Tito XD joined the WikiProject in October just after it had been founded. Since then he has contributed substantially to many articles, for example Hurricane Nora (1997), which is currently a Featured Article Candidate. He is also actively involved in the assessment of articles and so helps to improve many more articles.

Explanation of content

If you have a topic which is not directly related to any specific article but is relevant to the WikiProject bring it up on the Newsletters talk page, and it will probably be included in a future edition of The Hurricane Herald.

These two sections are decided by the community on the newsletter's talk page:
 * Storm of the month: This is determined by a straw poll on the page. While all storms will be mentioned on the newsletter, the selected storm will be described in more detail.
 * Member of the month: Nominations are made on the talk page, voting is by secret ballot; read the talk page for details. The winner receives the WikiProject's barnstar (when we make it).

Main Page content
 * 2005 Atlantic hurricane season appeared on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on June 1.
 * Hurricane Floyd will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on June 17.
 * Entries from Dvorak technique, Typhoon Joan (1970), Typhoon Chanchu (2006), and Storm of October 1804 appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during May.
 * Entries from 5 other articles relating to tropical cyclones had appeared in the Did you know column earlier in 2006.

Storm article statistics

The assessment scale
 * The cyclone assessment scale is one of the bases of the new assessment scale for Version 1.0 of Wikipedia. It splits articles into several categories by quality, to identify which articles are "finished" and which ones still need to be improved.
 * The assessment scale by itself counts of several grades:
 * FA: reserved for articles that have been identified as featured content only.
 * A: this grade is given to articles that are considered ready for peer review. The way to get this grade assigned to an article is by asking other cyclone editors at the WikiProject's assessment page.
 * GA: reserved for articles that have passed a good article nomination.
 * B: these articles are "halfway there", and have most of the details of a complete article, yet it still has significant gaps in its coverage.
 * Start: articles that fall in this category have a decent amount of content, yet it is weak in many areas. Be bold and feel free to improve them!
 * Stub: these articles are mostly placeholders, and may in some cases be useless for the reader. It needs a lot of work to be brought to A-Class level.
 * The way to use these assessments is by adding a parameter to the WikiProject template on the articles talk page ( as an example). This feeds the article into a category which is read and parsed to create an assessment table, summary and log.

Welcome back
Glad to have you back, Devon. I've unblocked you for now; I hope you will be able to work with the other editors. If you have any questions about what's appropriate, please ask me. And please remember not to insultor or be mean to other editors—we're all here to make Wikipedia better. Consider this sort of a "probation" period. Be nice, OK? — Knowledge Seeker দ 03:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Thansk, yet i'm still blocked! —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 04:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I cleared another autoblock. Try it now. — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Nopw, still blocked! —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 12:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Still blocked here! —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 01:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm getting annoyed here! Please unblock me. —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 23:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm unblocked now, thanks! —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 19:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

redirects
When moving a page, like you did with Rho-2 Cancri, please check for double redirects like 58 Cancri and fix them--Kalsermar 01:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Copyright
I am quite disappointed that after I unblocked you, you promptly returned to copying material from other web sites. To take another's work in this manner is both unethical and illegal, and it places Wikipedia in a precarious legal position. Devon, I like you, but by copying material in this manner, you are just creating more work for other users to check over your edits and revert them if they find you copying material. Other people shouldn't have to watch over your edits, Devon. If you're unable to contribute to Wikipedia without plagiarizing other material or violating international copyright law, then I'm afraid you can't be a contributor here. This behavior is not acceptable, and I've reblocked you indefinitely. I'm sorry. — Knowledge Seeker দ 18:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I didn't know it was copyrighted! Thanks you so much.  F.Y.I. blocking me dosn't make me learn my lesson, all dose is is makes me angry (especially at you).  With users like you (not calmly taking my actions) are making me think of going perminent wikibreak.  I don't want to leave wikipedia, but i'll have no choice.  UNBLOCK ME NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 01:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I am not trying to punish you or teach you a lesson; I am trying to keep copyrighted material out of Wikipedia. I previously tried discussing matters with you and you just demanded to be unblocked. I unblocked you and you went right back to the same behavior. I realize that perhaps you still do not understand copyright principles and I am willing to take time to explain it to you. I will not, however, unblock you until I am satisfied that you understand the principles involved and will not continue to copy material from other sources. Please do not add the template again. Wikipedia policy (as well as federal law) does not permit copying material in this manner. If these terms are not acceptable to you, then I'm afraid you'll have to find another web site to which to contribute. I don't wish to be harsh but copyright violations are not acceptable, and this really is not negotiable. I can't unblock you if you copy material like this. — Knowledge Seeker দ 21:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

I QUIT. I'd rather be in New Oreans through Hurricane Katrina then be a user on this website. Unblock me so I can delete my personal information (NOT YOU, ME!) I want to delete my data, Not you, not another user, Me! —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 00:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm sorry to hear that, Devon. I'd like to keep you as a contributor, though not if you're copying material from other web sites. I'd be happy to remove your personal information or even delete your user page if you like, but I can't unblock you. We can't allow copyright violators to edit. I'm sorry, Devon. — Knowledge Seeker দ 01:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I'd like to still be a user, but not a major one. Please unblock me, I sware on my dog's grave that I won't copyvio again.  I've done some reading about said subject.  I couldn't beleve the lawas I was breaking!  I feel very ashamed, I deserve to be blocked.  I promiss if you unblock me i'll never copy articals from copyrighted articals again and take pride in my editing.  Please don't make me kiss your ass and call it ice cream! —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 14:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm pleased you are willing to learn about and respect copyright and are wish to remain contributing to Wikipedia. Let's take some time to discuss copyright and other matters and how these are applied on Wikipedia. I do want to make a couple matters clear first. Repeat copyright violators are normally blocked indefinitely. I'm willing to take the time to help you understand these matters, but don't expect to be unblocked in the next couple days. Last time I gave you the benefit of the doubt and unblocked you before making certain you understood all the issues, and it didn't take long for the old behavior to resume. I understand that you may not have realized what you were doing, so this time we're going to talk first to be absolutely certain you understand what's involved. I hope you will be more amenable to discussion than later time. Also, you should try to work on your anger a little bit. The outbursts of the last couple days really aren't appropriate. We all get angry from time to time; my advice is to stay away from Wikipedia when you're angry. When you cool off, you can return. Finally, flattering me is not necessary, nor will it be effective. I try to be reasonably rational; as you may have seen, insults aren't effective either. Let's stick to the topics at hand, OK? And let's take our time this time. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I feel like a monster. But quick question. What happened to my Archive box? Why was it deleted? —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 14:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

 * It looks like an administrator thought you wanted it deleted, perhaps based on your earlier comments. I restored the archive. I want to explain two related concepts: plagiarism and copyright. I don't know how much you already know, so I'll start with basics, and I'll simplify it somewhat.

 * Plagiarism is presenting someone else's work as your own. It emphasizes more of the ethical violation. For instance, if you copy part of an encyclopedia article into your word processor and submit it as your school report, you're committing plagiarism. "Literary theft" is another term for this. A journalist was in the news some months back for copying parts of Wikipedia articles into his news articles, without crediting Wikipedia as the source. That is, he was presenting the article as wholly written by himself. This is unethical, and the journalism regards this as a violation of journalistic integrity, which is quite serious (I believe the reporter in question was fired). It's plagiarism even if you aren't selling the product; the act of pretending that someone else's work is your own is plagiarism. So be sure that for instance, when you're writing a school paper, you don't copy material from other sources. It won't be that hard for a Web-savvy teacher to discover that you didn't write the work yourself.

 * Copyright is a legal term; it refers to who has the right to copy, publish, and sell the work (either all or in part). It doesn't matter whether you admit you didn't create the work. For instance, the band U2 or their recording label owns the rights to the song "With or Without You". This means they can decide how the song can be copied or sold. It would be illegal for me to make a copy of the song or CD and give it to my friend, or for me to make the song available over the Internet. The former is not as serious, but in the second situation, making their copyrighted work available for many people is a serious copyright violation. It doesn't matter that I'm not pretending that I made the song myself. It's not my song to give away. By giving it away for free, I would distribute it to people who otherwise might have paid for it. In the extreme case, one person could buy the CD and just make copies for everyone else in the world who wanted it. Also, it doesn't matter if there is an explicit copyright notice on the work. Under U.S. copyright law, intellectual works are automatically copyrighted by the creator. So, for instance, the sentences I'm writing here are automatically copyright by me. Now the copyright holder may decide to release certain rights to his work. For instance, I might create an image and specify that anyone can use it for noncommercial purposes, that is, as long as they don't use it to sell something or for any sort of business purpose. This is how it's licensed. Most movies that you buy are licensed only for home use (watch the license information at the beginning). It would be illegal to sell tickets to people for them to come watch the movie. Another license is the GFDL. This is what we use on Wikipedia. While I retain the copyright to what I write, I release it under the GFDL, so that others may reuse it, provided they credit me with writing it. People don't have to grant any rights at all; this is called "all rights reserved".

 * So when you copy material from other web sites, you are often committing both plagiarism and copyright violations. On the one hand, you are taking someone else's work and pretending it's your own, which is unethical. And even if you credit them or list them as a reference, you're still using their creative work without their permission, which is a copyright violation; this is illegal (and unethical as well, in most people's opinions). Doing so damages the credibility of Wikipedia and opens it up to legal problems as well.

 * Do you understand this so far? And do you understand why the other users are so concerned? They're not doing saying those things to punish you or make you angry. They're doing it because they care about Wikipedia, the law, and being fair. — Knowledge Seeker দ 00:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

 * OMFG. Now I feel like a criminal.  I'm so sorry! —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 16:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I's so sorry about my past behavior. I'd like to come back as an editor on this site.  If you can forgive me though? —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 00:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry it's taken me a while to get back to you. I've been thinking about your situation over the past few days, and I've decided that I'm not comfortable removing your block. This is not a decision I've made lightly, and I'd like to explain.

I like you, and I've enjoyed your presence here. Enthusiastic editors are great to have around. But it's been a problem for you to follow policies here. It's one thing not to be familiar with Wikipedia policies, but once they're explained to you nicely, with links for more information, there really is no excuse for you to continue in the behavior. This has been a problem from when you first started here under your previous username, making inappropriate page moves that I had to sift through and undo. But the copyright violations are far worse, both because of their illegality but also because they are much harder to catch. I am quite busy at work these days and don't have time to mentor/supervise you. And it would be quite unfair and selfish of me to unblock you, forcing other editors to double-check all your contributions and revert the ones that are copyright violations. They have other tasks to do. It's especially disturbing because I already tried to get you to stop this behavior with my previous block; once I unblocked you you promptly resumed copying material from other web sites.

Everyone can make mistakes, but the really problematic behavior has been how you handle conflicts. Other users made good-faith efforts to explain to you why your actions were wrong or what to do differently. At best, you ignored them and continued the behavior, but in many cases, you got angry with them, harrassed them on their talk pages, or added them to a "users to kill" list. This is not the way to treat your fellow editors. And you shouldn't have to be repeatedly blocked to get you to discuss or change your behavior. And instead of discussion, you reacted with anger, stating you'd rather be a hurricaine victim than contribute here, and threatened suicide. This is not appropriate; it creates a lot of work for other editors and it is quite taxing.

I normally am quite generous with "second chances", but I am dismayed by the lack of effectiveness our previous discussions have had, that I've had to reblock you in order to converse with you. And as I mentioned earlier, I am just too busy right now to properly supervise you. If you wish, you may request unblocking via the template or by communicating with administrators via e-mail (privately or over the mailing list) or on IRC. To any reviewing administrator: you may use your judgment in evaluating this block. If you feel comfortable unblocking and supervising Hurricane Devon, you may feel free to do so; consultation with me is not required. You are welcome to contact me for further information or rationale. Outside parties may wish to see Requests for comment/Hurricane Devon for context. — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I feel like a monster for my past behavior. But I will promis you that if you unblock me again, i'll never use copyrihted stuff again.  I'm very sorry about that, but... I don't know.  I know I've been a bad person and friend, but I'll do better in the future.  Please trust me. —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 01:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

 * If anyone unblocks it should be done in the spirit of WP:AGF --Containment Unit 09:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I've learned my lesson know. I'd like to make my name good, not bad.  Please unblock me KS. —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 14:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm willing to take the responsibility for unblocking you if you agree to the following three conditions. First, I think you should agree to be on probation for the next six months.  During that time, you keep a box prominently displayed at the top of this page that explains you are on probation for copyright violations, and that explains you should be blocked for any copyright violations.  Second, within the first week of your unblocking, you should go through all your old contributions that still exist and mark them with db-author so that they can be speedily deleted.  A lot of them are still out there, and you can help clean up the mess.  Third, for the next month, refrain from starting new articles or uploading images.  If you agree to this, leave a note here agreeing to it, and I'll unblock you.  Mango juice talk 15:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

But i'ved leared my lesson. I won't copyvio stuff again. The point of being unblocked is to clean my name, not tell everyone els i'm a bad person. I'm not going to delete the popular articals i've copyvioed in, i'll fix and get rid of it but not delete it. And I'm not going to stop editing for a month. I'm willing to be on probation but not be a prisoner from this website. FYI. theres about 20 people in my building that are also members and they complain to me that they are also blocked because they have the same ID code. Think of them. —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 17:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Sorry, I wasn't very clear. What I want you to mark for deletion are the copyvio images you uploaded, and any articles that started out as copyright violations and only you have edited.  As you can see from the messages below, there are still lots of images you've uploaded that are problematic.  And I don't want you to stop editing for a month, rather, just don't upload any new images or create any new articles for a month.  The reason for this request is that most copyright violations happen when people upload images or create new articles.  There are plenty of articles out there in need of improvement.  Mango juice talk 06:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I understand, but a few things to tell you. One, all copyvio works i've uploaded have been deleted or being put up for deletion.  Two, ok for the month thing.  I've been through a lot.  Please unblock me know.  —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 12:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Ok, fair enough. I'm going to add the box to the top of your talk page here describing your probation.  I realize those images have been "put up for deletion" but it's a lot of work to verify copyright status, and they can be deleted more quickly if you agree to it, because of criteria for speedy deletion G7 which says "any page for which deletion is requested by the original author, provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author and was mistakenly created."  Tell you what, to save you the effort, if you can tell me which ones you agree are copyright violations that should be deleted, I'll start deleting them.  Mango juice talk 13:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Thanks, but i'm still blocked! —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 15:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Really? Weird.  I'm going to block you for one minute; see if it works after that.  If not, you may just have to wait for 24 hours.  If you're still blocked, can you post what it says when you try to edit?  Mango juice talk 18:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm still blocked. Pleade unblock me. —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 01:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Autoblock removed. Try again. --pgk( talk ) 07:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Thanks, now I'm unblocked. I promis to be a good editer and follow the rules. —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 12:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Glad to see it's working now. Returning to the mess cleanup; would it be okay if I delete all the images under the heading "Unfree images" below?  What about the ones under "Public domain images"?  Mango juice talk 02:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #2
The July issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use images
You uploaded the following images in Category:Hurricane Devon's uploads as "fair use", however you did not provide a fair use rationale. They are now listed on Images and media for deletion/2006 July 8.

Chaos syndrome 14:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:2005-1104galaxies.jpg
 * Image:617patroclus.jpg
 * Image:AB-Pictoris.jpg
 * Image:Aldebaran--planet.jpg
 * Image:And-s.jpg
 * Image:CatFromOuterSpace.jpg
 * Image:Cet-s.jpg
 * Image:Geminga.jpg
 * Image:LIPA.gif
 * Image:Leaderdog2.jpg
 * Image:NGC1097.jpg
 * Image:NGC1232.jpg
 * Image:Phot-19d-99.jpg
 * Image:Phot-20b-99.jpg
 * Image:Phot-20d-99.jpg
 * Image:Phot-27-00-normal.jpg
 * Image:Phot-32b-99.jpg
 * Image:Phot-37-05-normal.jpg
 * Image:SCR1845-6357--22.jpg
 * Image:SCR1845-6357.jpg
 * Image:SuperearthOGLE.jpg
 * Image:Tort1.jpg
 * Image:Virgo-Overdensity.png

Unfree images
You uploaded the following images in Category:Hurricane Devon's uploads as public domain, however the license at says that permission is required for publication. They are now listed at Possibly unfree images.

Chaos syndrome 14:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Messierobject109.jpg
 * Image:N4565hugo.jpg
 * Image:N4656.jpg
 * Image:N7753.jpg
 * Image:NGC3953.jpg

The following images also violate licenses, though you claim they are public domain. See Possibly unfree images for more information.

Chaos syndrome 14:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Eyesgalaxies.jpg
 * Image:NGC4321.jpg
 * Image:OmegaCentauri.jpg
 * Image:Piscesdwarf.jpg
 * Image:Stephan'sQuintet.jpg

Public domain images
You uploaded the following images in Category:Hurricane Devon's uploads as public domain. However, checking the source reveals no indication of this. They are now listed on Possibly unfree images.

Chaos syndrome 14:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:80606b-comparison.gif
 * Image:87sylvia.jpg
 * Image:97-BLG-41schematic.jpg
 * Image:BetaLyraeSky.jpg
 * Image:HD149026b-Jupiter.jpg
 * Image:Hd28185hr.gif
 * Image:HD80606AB.jpg
 * Image:IC1296.jpg
 * Image:IotaHorologii-orbit.jpg
 * Image:Kirbyvacuums.jpg
 * Image:M31pole.jpg
 * Image:M81+M82.jpg
 * Image:MACHO-1997-BLG-41.gif
 * Image:NGC1532.jpg
 * Image:Nova-DMLyrae.jpg
 * Image:TrES-1.jpg
 * Image:Vega--proplyd.gif
 * Image:Vega--proplyd2.jpg
 * Image:Vega-vs-sun.gif
 * Image:Waterjovian.jpg (actual source http://www.allplanets.ru/tipy_exoplanet.htm)
 * Image:Sulfurjovian.jpg

TfD nomination of Template:Image information
Template:Image information has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.  howch e  ng   {chat} 20:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Blocked again
You are again indefinitely blocked for violating your probation. On July 23, 2006, you uploaded Image:VCG.jpg. You claim the copyright holder allows this to be used for "any purpose" but I couldn't confirm this on the website. Regardless, you agreed not to upload new files for a month, so you're blocked again. I will not unblock you; if another administrator wishes to, they'll have to take responsibility for your constant copyright violations. Mango juice talk 19:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I uploaded that image on wikicommons, not wikipedia!!! You blocked me for doing something on a different website?  That's against my wikipedia probation?  If so, I'm sorry but you didn't tell me this was for every wiki-site.  I only thought it was for wikipedia.  I'm sorry, please unblock me.  You can't unblock me for something you didn't tell me or for doing something thats part of my Wikipedia probation on wikicommons!  —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 23:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I'M SORRY:( I DON"T WANT TO BE PERMENTLY BLOCKED!  I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT I DID WAS WRONG.  PLEASE DON'T PERMENTLY BLOCK ME!!! —  Hurricane  Dev  o  n  @ 23:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

 * The point of your probation is to keep your from violating copyrights. You did it again.  Uploading a copyrighted image to commons is even worse than uploading it here, because it then becomes that much more difficult to clean up the mess, and because the tainted file can then affect other wikipedias, not just English.  Besides, it's clear you were gaming your probation, uploading the file through commons so it wouldn't show up here.  I no longer believe you actually care about our copyright concern, you were just saying that before to get unblocked.  I don't know why you like violating copyright so much, but as far as I'm concerned, I'm not unblocking.  Mango juice talk 02:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Thanks for trying, Mangojuice. Devon, you violated copyright again despite Mangojuice's warnings and my explanations. If you didn't know it was wrong, despite Wikipedia's and Commons' policies, and despite our explanations, then you really can't be editing here. Even without the upload prohibition, this copyright violation, after all we've been through, is enough for me to say that you shouldn't be editing here anymore. Especially since in the short time you were unblocked, you made several other questionable edits, including editing an article to report that you had suggested a name for a galaxy. You may not realize why that's inappropriate, but it's really too much for other users to have to clean up after all this. Given the failure of two trial probations (actually three, I suppose), I must ask that any administrator considering unblocking you discuss the matter with me (and probably with Mangojuice) first, and to read these discussions and the RFC. I've enjoyed talking with you, Devon, but I don't think contributing to an encyclopedia's the best activity for you. — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:M108.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:M108.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Angr 09:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Template edits
Please make sure your edits to templates do not break large numbers of articles. Your recent edits to Template:Galaxy left ugly wikicode on display in every article using the template. I've reverted it back to how it was before your edits. Chaos syndrome 16:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Maffei.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Maffei.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shizhao 02:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:BetaLyrae.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BetaLyrae.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 10:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:IotaHorologii-b.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:IotaHorologii-b.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 19:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Cet-s.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cet-s.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 22:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Rocko
I found this http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:_NvpjptJFmEJ:www.thethingsiwant.com/gifting/cview.php4%3FITID%3D482077+%22Rocko+James+Wallabee%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5 - It's a clothing site that also mentions Rocko's full name. WhisperToMe 15:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Aldrovanda1.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aldrovanda1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 17:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:NGC 6822.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:NGC 6822.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 18:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Mira illustration.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mira illustration.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 20:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright violation article Gliese 581 b
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Gliese 581 b, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! Chaos syndrome 10:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #3
The August issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:LMC.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LMC.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree images
The following images that you uploaded or altered have been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the images' copyright status cannot be verified, they may be deleted. Please go to the image pages to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of these images (if you have any), if you are interested in them not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 20:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:NGC4027.jpg
 * Image:Sn2003Bbig2.jpg
 * Image:NGC4631.jpg
 * Image:NGC3054.jpg
 * Image:NGC3627.jpg
 * Image:M65rgb.jpg
 * Image:Maffei 2.jpg
 * Image:Maffei 1.jpg

Possibly unfree Image:M98.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:M98.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 20:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:M58.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:M58.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 20:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

The usual drill... again...
Image:Leoi.gif, Image:UMa-north.gif, WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 20:44, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:NewHorizons@Jupiter.jpg, Image:Dwingeloo 1.jpg, Image:Dawn dm.jpg, WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 20:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:DeltaTri.jpg, WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 20:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)]

Some more, now on WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 21:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC) ...and another one Image:GalaxyM60.jpg. See WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 21:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Phot-19d-99.jpg
 * Image:Phot-20d-99.jpg
 * Image:Phot-20b-99.jpg
 * Image:Phot-19b-99.jpg
 * Image:Virgo-Overdensity.png
 * Image:SCR1845-6357.jpg
 * Image:AB-Pictoris.jpg
 * Image:Phot-27-00-normal.jpg
 * Image:NGC1097.jpg
 * Image:NGC1232.jpg
 * Image:GQ Lupi.jpg

I'm sorry, let's try again
Hello. I'm a user that has made a bad name of not just wikipedia, but himself. I would like to make a good name for myself. And to do this appologize to everyone i've done wrong to. Knoledge seeker and Mangojuicetalk, You've looked to me with good intentions but I crushed them with lies. Chaos syndrom, you care about me and I a did was almost made you quit yourself.

My "vacation" has givin' me a positive attitude. I'm not going to force anything to anyone, but if you can find it in your heart to forgive me and give me a second chance. —  Hurricane Dev  o  n  @ 12:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

 * Removed your unblock-auto request, since you aren't autoblocked. Anyone wanting to unblock this guy please talk to me first: despite his good intentions, I myself am not willing to take a chance on trusting him again.  Mango juice talk 18:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:NewHorizons@Jupiter.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NewHorizons@Jupiter.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Conscious 08:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Antennen-galaxies2.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Antennen-galaxies2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 18:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:SCR1845-6357--22.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SCR1845-6357--22.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Image information
Template:Image information has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Extrasolar Planet small
A tag has been placed on Template:Extrasolar Planet small requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Andromeda Footer
A tag has been placed on Template:Andromeda Footer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Devon of NuclearVacuum?
I think this user has abandoned this user ID, and is now using the user ID User:NuclearVacuum. Either that or he has become a sockpuppet master. GabrielVelasquez (talk) 21:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

A new task force - ESA
Hello,

I've noticed that you are active in the area of space exploration. I just wanted to let you know that a European Space Agency task force has been set up to improve the presently very poor condition of articles about ESA and related topics. If you are interested, please join the task force here. We sure could use your help. Thanks.U5K0 (talk) 11:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Dionemap.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dionemap.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Np
Template:Np has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 04:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Devon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ~  Nerdy Science  Dude  13:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Travel Management Company
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Travel Management Company, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.linkedin.com/companies/travel-management-co..

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Travel Management Company
A tag has been placed on Travel Management Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~  Nerdy Science  Dude  13:12, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Website-short
Template:Website-short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Leaderdog2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Leaderdog2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Template:Website listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Website. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Website redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 22:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ssc2006-05b.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ssc2006-05b.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Tort1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tort1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:CatFromOuterSpace.jpg
 * File:Exoneptune.jpg

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 00:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NGC 4038 Group

The article NGC 4038 Group has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. No significant coverage in studies, not in a catalogue of note (not actually in the NGC catalogue, just named after it), nothing visible to the naked eye, and no sources before 1850 were found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 20:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SN 2006F

The article SN 2006F has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Does not pass WP:NASTRO"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Geminga.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Geminga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Plutonian-system-size.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Plutonian-system-size.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HouseBlastertalk 13:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hurricane Devon


text:
Lockdown (Stargate SG-1)

"Lockdown" is the third episode for season eight of the Canadian-American military science fiction television series Stargate SG-1. The episode was written by Joseph Mallozzi and Paul Mullie, and directed by Will Waring. This was the only episode in the eighth season to receive a syndication rating, but was also one of the lowest rated of the season on the Nielsen household ratings. The episode got strong reviews from major media publishers worldwide.

"Lockdown" is about the discovery of an outbreak of disease which first occurred in the Russian Federation, but later on infects personnel of Stargate Command. The outbreak is later revealed to be the ethereal remains of Anubis. At the same time, Jack O'Neill stops the recruiting process for SG-1 leaving Samantha Carter as the new leader of SG-1 throughout season 8. Anubis tries to take new hosts but is eventually defeated and forced to a destination chosen by Carter, a frozen, barren planet.

Plot
Several months after the destruction of Anubis' fleet, Stargate Command gets a new member in the form of Russian Air Force Colonel Alexi Vaselov (Russian: Алексей Вaсильев) who promptly asks General O'Neill for a place in SG-1. After the general rejects this request, Daniel talks to Vaselov about it, but the colonel suddenly collapses. When he wakes up again, he doesn't remember anything since he was in Russia, and his body shows signs of extensive viral damage. Gen O'Neill is concerned that there may be a contagion on the base, and orders Daniel to the infirmary just as he is about to leave on a mission with SG-11. Daniel suddenly pulls out his gun and injures several people, yelling for the gate to be opened, before he is stopped by O'Neill and Teal'c. O'Neill orders for no one to enter or leave the base to avoid spreading possible disease.

Meanwhile, Vaselov begins to remember what happened—that he felt like being trapped in his own body—and he blames himself for what has happened. It is also discovered that a Russian cosmonaut from the International Space Station died a week after returning to Russia, exhibiting the same symptoms as Vaselov, and that Vaselov was with him when he died. Later, Daniel wakes up and quickly remembers that he was taken over by Anubis. It turns out that the former System Lord, thanks to his half-ascended form as a dark specter, can easily travel between hosts. He got into the cosmonaut's body from space debris, and is moving from person to person to get to the stargate. The members of SGC conclude that Anubis plans to leave through the stargate rather than use his ascended powers, since that would draw attention from the Ancients. However, he needs a body in order to get through the stargate. In the meantime, Anubis is easily eluding capture, so the SGC must execute a bold plan to stop him.

This plan involves splitting the base into three zones. Power to the stargate is shut off, and is only accessible from Zone 1. The gate itself, and its surrounding areas, is in Zone 2. Hallways between the zones and into the gateroom are blocked using drop-down steel doors, and these can only be opened from Zone 3. All staff are restricted to one section only—no movement between sections is allowed.

However, Anubis takes over Carter (who is in the section controlling the "lockdown"), and makes her schedule a program to open the doors temporarily. She goes into the new control room and begins dialing the gate. O'Neill tries to stop her. With no other options, Jack and Major Kearney trigger the self-destruct, only for Jack to zat Kearney, revealing that Anubis is now possessing Jack's body. With the Stargate now active, Anubis now controlling Jack attempts to walk through the Stargate but Carter gets to the control room and ends the self-destruct sequence. She doesn't, however, manage to stop the gate from dialing, and it activates. Just as O'Neill is about to step through the gate, Col Vaselov, who has escaped from the infirmary, stops him. He holds O'Neill/Anubis at gunpoint and tells the Goa'uld to take his body instead. Anubis accepts, and steps through the stargate in Vaselov's body.

Afterwards, Carter reveals that Anubis did not actually escape, as she did manage to override the dialing process to send him to an alternate address. The planet she chose to send him to was extremely cold, so Vaselov's body froze, leaving Anubis unable to dial a new address.

Production
Aaron Pearl who portrayed Major Kearney in the episode, previously played the younger version of George Hammond in the season two episode "1969". "Lockdown" was the first shot episode for season eight, but became the third to air so that they could continue the cliffhanger after previous season episode, "Lost City". Writer Joseph Mallozzi wanted to have an episode centered around the Jack O'Neill new job in Stargate Command, to "Test him early" on "as the new [...] commander."

In the first script draft, Anubis was set to appear in a fiery planet at the end of the episode, but when the script was finished he ended up in a frozen planet. Mallozzi when commenting on the episode, said it was an "Image I'd been dying to use". When Samantha Carter told Jack O'Neill in the original draft where she had sent Anubis, O'Neill responded "Well, I hope he wore his warm socks." The line was dropped since producers felt it was "too callous" for the character. One of the early scenes featuring Alexi Vaselov, where he awakens to find Teal'c in the observation room, was originally scripted to take place in the infirmary. Originally Teal'c was set to appear at Daniel Jackson's bedsite with Vaselov engaging in the conversation.

Reception
"Lockdown" received 2.0 in Nielsen household rating and 1.7 in syndication ratings becoming the only episode in season eight to receive a syndication rating. The episode debuted on the Sci Fi Channel in the United States on July 23, 2004, with Stargate Atlantis episode "Hide and Seek". It was the top-rated show on the Sci Fi Channel that week. "Lockdown" drew close to 2.7 million viewers in the United States, this was down four-tenths from the previous episode "New Order". While the viewership was higher than the previous season which averaged a 1.8 in Nielsen household ratings, "Lockdown" was surpassed by sister show Stargate Atlantis episode "Hide and Seek" in ratings and viewership. The episode was noted as the first Stargate SG-1 episode which was not the top-rated show on the Sci Fi Channel in the week in two years.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Lockdown (Stargate SG-1)


text:
Zero Hour (Stargate SG-1)

"Zero Hour" is the fourth episode from Season 8 of the military science fiction television series Stargate SG-1. It was written by producer Robert C. Cooper and directed by Peter Woeste. Clips of the episode were shown on Late Night with Conan O'Brien before Season 8 began, with Late Night graphic designer Pierre Bernard making a cameo appearance in the episode. The first airing of "Zero Hour" on July 30, 2004 on the American Sci Fi Channel was viewed by 3 million people. The episode received mixed reviews.

"Zero Hour" takes place shortly after the promotion of main character Jack O'Neill from Colonel to Brigadier General. With O'Neill being the new leader of Stargate Command (SGC), Lt. Col. Samantha Carter has assumed O'Neill's old position as leader of the SG-1 unit. The idea to have the episode focus on General O'Neill solving various problems at his new job came from the writers' wondering what the general of the SGC does while his teams are on missions.

Plot
The episode takes place over the course of five days, counting down to an at first unrevealed event named "Zero Hour". Five days to Zero Hour, General O'Neill is introduced to his new administrative aide, Mark Gilmor, who makes a suspicious phone call. Meanwhile, O'Neill's new position as a general is twofold. He needs to decide decorations for an upcoming official visit, and prepare SG-1 for its next offworld trip. A quickly growing alien plant and the arrival of two brawly Amrans, possible trade partners from another world, lead O'Neill to write a letter to General Hammond, his predecessor.

At four days to Zero Hour, the alien plant has grown to cover many areas of the base. After SG-1 go missing on their off-world mission, a Goa'uld named Ba'al contacts Stargate Command and suggests an exchange of the captured SG-1 against Camulus, another Goa'uld who requested asylum on Earth several episodes before. With the help of Camulus, a potent power source is found and brought back to Stargate Command, only to find it tainted by Camulus (powering it up could result in the destruction of the Solar System). With the SGC suffering from a temporary electricity failure caused by the alien plants, Ba'al's renewed contacting only results in O'Neill's mocking. Exhausted by sleep deprivation two days to Zero Hour, O'Neill finishes his letter to General Hammond to inform him of his resignation.

Although Camulus leaves Earth, Ba'al does not send back SG-1. When all SG teams announce their trust and support for the general, SG-1 dial the Stargate from offworld, revealing that they were never captured by Ba'al but instead were trapped in a secret base. After their safe return, O'Neill attests new SG-1 leader Samantha Carter's positive leadership skills. It is revealed that the ZPM Camulus was given to supposedly kill Ba'al (which Ba'al would use to destroy Earth) was actually the dead one from Antarctica. Zero Hour makes up the last minutes of the episode. The President is about to arrive, and Gilmor announces that his special assignment, initiated by the President's order, will end the next day. Gilmor expresses his respect, and as they leave to greet the President, the camera zooms in on the resignation letter on O'Neill's desk, with the last words, "Never mind".

Production
Despite being fourth in the airing order, "Zero Hour" was filmed as the seventh out of the twenty episodes of Season 8. The limited availability of Richard Dean Anderson (Jack O'Neill), who only worked 3.5 days out of five working days a week during the eighth season, extended the seven-day filming period to four weeks. With "Zero Hour" being a bottle episode to save money, director Peter Woeste filmed the majority of the episode on the standing SGC sets at The Bridge Studios, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The labs of Dr. Lee and Carter were filmed in the same room of the standing set, and a storage room for filming equipment was remodeled into the office of Gilmor. Second unit director Andy Mikita was responsible for the off-world scenes of the SG teams, filmed in Tynehead Park, one of the few undeveloped Vancouver locations that still allows filming. O'Neill in his sleeping quarters was the episode's last filmed scene, shot in two takes to allow Anderson to catch his flight home to Los Angeles.

The inspiration for the episode came from the SG-1 writers wondering for years what George Hammond, the SGC leader from seasons one through seven, does while SG-1 is away on missions. Imagined scenarios ranged from the general dealing with minor decisions like bunting and lunch buffet, to averting major emergencies and threats. The episode's working title was "A Day in the Life of General O'Neill", but writer Robert C. Cooper felt "Zero Hour" was more appropriate, referring to the President's visit at the end of the episode. The subplot of the SGC being overrun with plant life originates in a Season 4 idea by writer and producer Brad Wright. To not interrupt the shooting process, the set was decorated with various plants and vines overnight. Some plants were plastic, but real plants were used for the torching scenes, sprayed to be flame retardant so as not to burn the whole set. Jim Menard as the director of photography was responsible for the green lighting when the emergency lighting goes off. He achieved depth by using differently-colored lights in the control room and near the gate.

"Zero Hour" features several guest stars. Los Angeles actor David Kaufman was brought in to play the part of Mark Gilmor,  a red herring to the story. Cliff Simon, flown in from L.A. for a day's work, filmed most of his scenes as Ba'al against green-screen in the gateroom for a "hologram feel". Bill Dow (Dr. Lee) was doing theater work in Vancouver during the filming of this episode, necessitating the producers to schedule around his availability. Gary Jones's character, an SG-1 semi-regular technician who sported the name "Norman Davis" on his uniform for years, received a new name in this episode: "Walter Harriman". After O'Neill had referred to him as "Walter" in the Season 4 episode "2010", the producers could not get clearance for a renaming into "Walter Davis". The new name is based on General Hammond referring to Jones's character as "Airman" (sounding like "Harriman") in the pilot episode, and SG-1 writer Joseph Mallozzi explained the resulting incongruity as a married-name issue. One scene in "Zero Hour" features Pierre Bernard, a graphic designer for the NBC show Late Night with Conan O'Brien, as technician O'Brien. The SG-1 producers saw Bernard ranting on Late Night about Stargate SG-1 being better without Daniel Jackson (actor Michael Shanks was not part of SG-1 during Season 6), and gave him a cameo spot.

Reception
Producer Robert C. Cooper was satisfied with "Zero Hour", claiming that Richard Dean Anderson "is fantastic in this episode. It's new-yet-classic O'Neill and fans of the character will be forever pleased with this." When "Zero Hour" first aired on the Sci Fi Channel on July 30, 2004, it achieved a 2.2 Household rating, equaling approximately 3 million viewers. Tied with "Icon", this marked the sixth-highest rating for any Season 8 episode of Stargate SG-1.

DVD Talk called "Zero Hour" "a playful episode" with a "funny sub-plot involving an alien plant", but recognized the episode's contribution to the overall story arc. TV Zone considered the plant threat "a nice change" but regretted that it was only a red herring for a later plot revelation. Bringing the plants to the SGC at all was regarded irritating, as the "obvious move [to build a secure lab on an uninhabited planet] doesn't make for such good drama." O'Neill acting as the new leader made "the Goa'uld threat [...] a laugh" and "an amazing change from the events from the series' early days" where O'Neill took this race more seriously. The actual zero hour plot concerning the "harassed" O'Neill was considered "a nice touch". Conan O'Brien, who had shown a clip of Pierre Bernard's scene in his late night show before the first airing, congratulated Bernard for doing a good job, and Bernard would be invited back to the Stargate SG-1 set for a scene in the 200th episode of the show.

title: Zero Hour (Stargate SG-1)


text:
Baranof Warm Springs, Alaska

Baranof Warm Springs is a small, primarily seasonally-occupied community located in the city and borough of Sitka, Alaska, on the eastern side of Baranof Island, from which it likely derives its name, in the Alexander Archipelago. It is occasionally referred to simply as Baranof. Baranof Warm Springs is located at 57.08944°N, -134.83306°W.

Geography
Baranof Warm Springs is located on Warm Springs Bay which is just off of Chatham Strait. Just about a half mile up from the settlement is Baranof Lake, a large glacially-fed freshwater lake. Baranof Lake is fed from small unnamed glacial run-off streams as well as the relatively large Baranof River. Between the half mile outlet between Baranof Lake and Warm Springs Bay there are a series of rapids and waterfalls that have proven to be lethal when run.

Baranof Warm Springs is located on the southern part of a 34 mi, 5 to 10 mi exposure of a biotite-quartz diorite batholith that crosses northern Baranof Island.

Community
Baranof Warm Springs is a very small community, having only caretakers in the winter and intermittent visitors in the summer. There are around 15 seasonal homes. The community lies inside the jurisdiction of the City and Borough of Sitka. Other than property taxes and any dock fees from the new dock (2016) there is only one tax-paying commercial enterprise, the Baranof Wilderness Lodge and Resort. The city, in return, funds maintenance of a boardwalk which serves as the main thoroughfare as well as the dock for transient vessels. The community of property owners (BPOA- Baranof Property Owners Association) pools money together to pay for a seasonal (winter) caretaker for seasonally-inhabited residences, the city-owned picnic shelter (possible shelter for those needing it), the public bath house (which features three separate tubs), and the communal warm springs pools. Another caretaker is hired to tend to the Baranof Lodge from October 1 to May 1 when the owners of the Lodge return.

History
Baranof Warm Springs was used frequently by the Tlingit of Angoon. People of western descent did not find the springs until 1891. It was serviced by a post office from 1907 through 1912, under the name of Baranoff.

Demographics
Baranof Warm Springs appeared on the U.S. Census twice as an unincorporated village. First in 1930 as Baranof with 25 residents and as "Baronof" in 1940 with 10 residents. It was later annexed into the City and Borough of Sitka.

Transportation
Baranof Warm Springs is accessible via floatplane with regularly scheduled flights leaving Sitka. The trans-island flight is 30 minutes on a clear day and an hour on an overcast one. The Alaska Marine Highway does not service Baranof Warm Springs and there is no scheduled ferry/marine passenger services to the community. Baranof Warm Springs itself does not feature any roads, and the boardwalk does not accommodate ATVs.

Attractions
The primary attraction is the warm springs. There are a total of nine separate hot springs with temperatures from lukewarm to 120 degrees F. Only one is developed in a natural state and is located right up against the white water of the Baranof River. The community built a public bathhouse at the waterfront to provide an option for visitors not wanting to bathe communally and/or make the 1/4 mile hike up the trail to the natural springs.

Small tour boats come in frequently in the summer, but also fishermen, and employees of the Hidden Falls Hatchery visit as well. On the northern end of Baranof Lake there is also a Forest Service cabin that is quite popular. The cabin can only be reached by boat or float plane. The terrain is too steep to hike.

Baranof Warm Springs is home to the Coastal Research and Education Center, a research base and educational facility operated seasonally by the Alaska Whale Foundation.

title: Baranof Warm Springs, Alaska


text:
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 August 27

Category:Rap/hip hop songs inspired by funk songs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 23:23, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Absolutely non-maintainable and absolutely non-neccessary. --FuriousFreddy 22:57, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. That does seem quite specific. -- Reinyday, 07:27, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Overcategorization. siafu 18:30, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. ∞ Who ? ¿ ?  20:04, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

merge Category:Environment into Category:Environmentalism

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge --Kbdank71 13:03, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I believe most of Category:Environment should be merged into Category:Environmentalism, but a few topics should be merged into Category:Ecology. I can't see what the benefit of Category:Environment is in addition to the other two categories.  If this goes through, Category:Environment by country and the subsequent subcategories should be renamed to Category:Ecology by country. -- Reinyday, 18:44, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. No argument. siafu 18:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge the titled nomination, but think there should be a seperate CfD for the rest. -Splash 23:43, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, with the caveats mentioned by Splash. This question only deals with one cat. Nae'blis 20:35:29, 2005-08-31 (UTC)
 * Don't merge These are quite separate concepts with very different populations of articles. If anything, the merge should go the other way. The Environment is the major topic - environmentalism is just the groups trying to protect the Environment. Ecology is a subset. Vsmith 02:46, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Ecology is not a subset. Ecology is the study of the environment.  Geography is the study of land.  We have Category:Geography.  We do not have Category:Land.  Everything that is in Category:Environment fits under "Environmentalism" or "Ecology".  I would be happy to list which articles I think should be moved to each category. -- Reinyday, 14:20, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Er, environmentalism is a social movement to protect the environment. Articles on the environment do not belong under an environmentalism category. Category:Environmentalism should be (and is) a sub-cat. within Category:Environment. Futhermore ecology is the study of the interaction of living things with the environment. Vsmith 02:22, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category: Roman Catholic musicians

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus (no change). ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 23:25, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Category:Roman Catholic actors recently sailed through CfD with broad consensus; this category should be deleted for similar reasons. Nandesuka 18:35, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep: We divide people by occupation and nationality. Why not religion?  We have a Category:Musicians by religion container for this category. I'm sorry I missed the actors vote, but this is part of a huge navigational scheme for classifying people:
 * -- Reinyday, 21:41, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: There is also a List of Christian entertainers. -- Reinyday

 * Delete - A lot of the people in this category are dubious inclusions anyway. JW 11:16, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same as before (no people by religion by occupation cats). siafu 18:33, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is just a fairly unintersting overlap category. -Splash 23:43, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Reinyday. — Instantnood 13:42, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Political parties not allowing opposition

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 23:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

 * This category currently has no members. Also, it seems like an odd way to classify parties, especially as there is already a category for single-party system partiesVino s 16:45, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Reinyday, 21:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No argument. siafu 18:34, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the other's being used, no need for duplication. If it goes, someone may want to notify User:Wilfried_Derksen of the decision. Nae'blis 22:17:19, 2005-08-31 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Images containing nudity

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 23:53, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I can't see any rational reason for the existence of this category. The mix of images included is essentially arbitrary (the diagrams of reproductive systems being there is ridiculous). --Ngb 07:24, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The reason for the existence of this category is so people looking for nudity can find it easily. I think that is a good enough reason to delete it, but I don't think you'll prevent people from trying to make the Wikipedia navigable in this way.  -- Reinyday, 07:26, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * A perfectly reasonable category - I think I shall create . Delete. Grutness...  wha?  07:37, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * COMMENT I noticed that this is attached to Category:Nudity... 132.205.45.148 16:37, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete covered by Category:Nudity. I think  would be better. :)   ∞ Who ? ¿ ?  17:50, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * COMMENT images should always be kept in a separate category, otherwise, it will overwhelm a normal category... 132.205.3.20 19:59, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No argument. siafu 18:34, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep.. Enough puritanism already.  -Seth Mahoney 01:50, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - or add one for naked puritans. Vsmith 02:35, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: see also the previous polls #1 #2. — Instantnood 13:56, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Relevant policies: Wikipedia is not censored and Pornography. Some images should not stay, tho. — Instantnood 13:56, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't see the relevance of those policies to this CfD. I haven't proposed the category for deletion because of 'puritanism', as User:Sethmahoney suggests above, and as you imply here by linking to these policies. I simply don't see that it has any remotely useful purpose as a category: I've yet to see anyone can give a sensible explanation of what it's for. As Grutness points about above, we don't have any other arbitrary classifications of images (no 'Images containing cars', 'Images containing dancing', 'Images containing milk') -- what makes nudity different? --Ngb?!? 15:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Althought I can't think of any specific examples, this could serve a useful purpose. Nudity is a little different than a car or milk. I find it intresting to be able to see what articles have nude pictures and why. I suppose the only problem that could arise would be what the definition of nudity is. --The_stuart 18:48, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The image themselves are fine, if relevant to articles, but I don't think WP is meant as an image gallery.  Someone above suggests an analogy with "Images containing trees", which I'd also vote to delete. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 20:00, 2005 September 3 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:ISO C standards

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge/Delete with Category:C standards. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 23:54, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

The idea of having separate categories Category:ISO C89 standard, Category:ISO C99 standard, Category:ANSI C standard is very good, and so is the idea of having them all listed under Category:C standards, but I don't see the point of having this intermediate category. Delete and recat the contents in Category:C standards. --Quuxplusone 04:30, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No argument. siafu 18:35, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and recat. (SEWilco 17:27, 1 September 2005 (UTC))

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Marvel Comics Reformed Supervillains

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 23:55, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

About half of these characters are still technically supervillains, several of them never were villains and were only manipulated into fighting the good guys once or twice, and a number of villains who reformed and then reverted to type aren't included. No way for this to stay up to date; easier to categorize characters who have definitely been villains into Category:Marvel Comics supervillains and those who have definitely been heroes into Category:Marvel Comics superheroes (if they aren't in subcategories of the relevant categories already). Also, incorrect capitalization. Delete. -Sean Curtin 04:02, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * RENAME to Category:Marvel Comics superhumans who have been heroic and villainous and populate properly 132.205.45.148 16:39, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just toss them into both Marvel Comics superheroes and Marvel Comics supervillains.
 * Delete. Overcategorization. siafu 18:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete/Comment: If it's covered in the scope of this nomination, recat them into both as described above by the unattributed vote. Nae'blis 22:21:42, 2005-08-31 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Australasian rugby league to Category:Oceanian rugby league

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus (no change) --Kbdank71 13:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Operation: Rename
 * Reason: Scope of Category's articles and content is greater then the title allows for. Thus changing from Australasian --> Oceanian. This should also facilitate the moving of other articles into a more appropriate category. POds 01:44, 27 August 2005 (UTC);
 * Hmmm... it's a little more complex than that. Several of the countries aren't in Oceania, true (and in some which are often called Australasian the term is disliked), but Australia isn't always grouped in with Oceania, either. would cover all the bases, despite being more cumbersome. Grutness...  wha?  07:40, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Well according to wiki, Australia is in Oceania, although, a bit like the term Australasia, it may mean different things to different people. But we have the benefit of being able to tell people what it means on wiki, by a simple --> link:Oceania. I think Oceania pretty much covers it. Do we get to vote on this? Shouldn't we be using the discussion page for talking? POds 12:19, 27 August 2005 (UTC);
 * Talk related to possible voting is fair game here, and any comments relating to how a categoiry should be renamed is related to any possible votes. If there's no problem with the term Oceania including both Australia and PNG (which to this New Zealander sounds quite odd), then my vote would be to rename. Grutness...  wha?  23:18, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * If there are categories, Europe and Oceania, which there would be if this renaming went a head, those looking for Australia would know to look in Oceania. Australia is known as the worlds largest island after all and it is part of the Pacific. It should be put to a vote and then the people of the world can decide... How and when is that done? POds 03:08, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeees, but for every person who tells you that Australia's the worldd's largest island, you'll get one who tells you it's the world's smallest continent. And if Australia is not always classed as Oceania, then that goes doubly for Papua New Guinea. And "island/part of the Pacific" could just as well mean Taiwan or Japan, and you wouldn't get many people considering them Oceanian. Having said all that, I'd agree that (note the added n) is probably the best name. Grutness...  wha?  02:29, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename to Oceanian rugby league, the wiki article says that Oceania is the area we a re talking about. Grinner 19:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Comment: Is there a reason why we need this broader category? Why not just have rugby leagues by country, as in Category:Australian rugby league, Category:Papua New Guinean rugby league, etc.?  These could be part of Category:Rugby league by country, instead of the further subdivision of continent/region.  -- Reinyday, 20:08, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * A fair comment, although given that some teams from new zealand and (ISTR) PNG play in the Australian league set-up, it may have a use. Separating by country may indeed be a more sensible way to go, though. Grutness...  wha?  01:05, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, I think it began as a way to make the categories neater. In fact, I don't like the naming of categories, "Australian Rugby League" and others the like, because they are the names of organisations. I think the best way to go would be to have a set of Categories such as, "Rugby league in ", like the set of articles I've started to create. Then we'd move almost all of whats in the " Rugby League" categories to the new "Rugby league in " category, except for articles and sub-categories like New South Wales Rugby League, Queensland Rugby League etc. That's what I was almost going to propose a few weeks ago, but it just seemed far too bold :). Or, we could just move those set of categories to the new proposed set. POds 02:08, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Also, it may not warrent categories such by each country as of yet because, like those countries in the pacific, there wouldnt be enough contributors to populate the categories. They'd sit dormant for quite a long time. Puting in the Region I guess cleans things up at the top level and whilst keeping all categories useful. POds 02:14, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Ok all. And i didnt notice the difference between oceania and oceanian, thanx. I've changed the above to point that way. POds 02:08, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Symbols in Hinduism and Category:Christian Symbols

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Rename. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 23:57, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Rename to Category:Hindu symbols and Category:Christian symbols, respectively. --Neutralitytalk 01:05, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename to Category:Hindu symbols and Category:Christian symbols. Hindi is a language. - choster 04:49, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that was a typo. I've corrected it. Neutralitytalk 05:47, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. -- Reinyday, 21:22, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename Category:Symbols in Hinduism, Speedy for the other. siafu 18:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Web Comics

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Rename. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 23:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Category:Web comics to Category:Webcomics
 * Category:Furry web comics to Category:Furry webcomics
 * Category:Sprite web comics to Category:Sprite webcomics
 * Category:Web comics stubs to Category:Webcomics stubs
 * Category:Web comic media to Category:Webcomic media
 * Since the main article is at webcomic and not at web comic, the spelling of this categories' titles should be consistent with that. --Fibonacci 00:31, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom.  ∞ Who ? ¿ ?  01:53, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. Nandesuka 17:49, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. -- Reinyday, 21:21, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Per what, excuse me? --Fibonacci 23:21, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Per nominator, meaning we agree with you. -- Reinyday, 07:22, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. --Fibonacci 17:39, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename per yute. Er, nom. siafu 18:39, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Hehe, the two yutes. ∞ Who ? ¿ ?
 * Rename per nom. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 23:09, 2005 September 2 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


text: User talk:213.239.215.172

title: User talk:213.239.215.172


text:
Hot Tamales

Hot Tamales is an American brand of cinnamon-flavored candies introduced in 1950 manufactured and marketed by the Just Born company. They were developed by Bob Born, son of Sam Born, the company's founder. The name derives from the sometimes spicy flavor of tamales. It was the top-selling cinnamon candy in 1999.

Variations
In 2011, Just Born released Hot Tamales 3 ALARM containing a mix of three candies: orange (hot), pinkish (hotter) and dark red (hottest). Around this time, Just Born also marketed Hot Tamales Fire (originally Super Hot Hot Tamales) with a hotter flavor and darker color. In 2014, Just Born released Hot Tamales Tropical Heat that contains three candies, combining the original pungent, spicy flavor with lemon, mango and pineapple flavor.

A spearmint version, Hot Tamales Ice, was marketed in the late 2000s, but was subsequently discontinued. It was reintroduced again in 2018 combined with the regular Hot Tamales and marketed as Hot Tamales Fire & Ice.

Ingredients
As listed on the original Hot Tamales and Hot Tamales Fire boxes:

Sugar, corn syrup, modified food starch, contains less than 0.5% of the following ingredients: dextrin, medium chain triglycerides, fruit juice from concentrate (pear, orange, strawberry, cherry, lemon, lime), sodium citrate, pectin, citric acid, malic acid, fumaric acid, confectioners glaze, carnauba wax, white mineral oil, artificial flavors, artificial color, sodium citrate, magnesium hydroxide, red #3, red #40, yellow #5 (tartrazine), yellow #6, blue #1.

title: Hot Tamales