text:
McAdam, New Brunswick

McAdam is a village located in the southwestern corner of York County, New Brunswick, Canada. The village covers 14.28 km2 and had a population of 1,151 as of 2016. An independent study was executed early 2018, and the results found that the population of McAdam had grown to 1,225. Turning the tide of a shrinking population, this is the first time the community's population grew since 1956.

The area was first settled in the mid-to-late 19th century as a group of small lumber camps. The area further developed due to its advantageous location as an important railway junction between the main line of the Canadian Pacific Railway from the Maritime provinces to New England and central Canada and branch lines to St. Stephen, St. Andrews and Woodstock. The town was an important servicing stop for many passenger and freight trains, as well as military trains during the World Wars. A large railway station was built to accommodate travelers and a roundhouse and yard were located in the village. The conversion of locomotives from steam power to diesel during the 1950s, as well as highway improvements and increased trucking during the 1960s and 1970s, saw McAdam decline in importance for rail transport. Decreased employment with the railway caused significant economic challenges for the community during the latter half of the 20th century and early 21st century.

History
Original settlement of present-day McAdam area began sometime between 1857 and 1869, after the establishment of the St. Andrews and Quebec Railway (SA&Q). McAdam began under the name of City Camp which was originally a collective of several lumbering encampments which sprung up alongside the line. By the late 1860s the European and North American Railway's "Western Extension" was completed. This line joined the SA&Q line (by now part of the New Brunswick Railway) in City Camp; as a result City Camp was renamed to McAdam Junction after John McAdam a prominent lumberman and politician, who had numerous land grants in the Canterbury Parish and Dumfries Parish parishes at that time.

By 1871 McAdam was a junction of limited importance and this contributed to a rise in population to about four hundred people, mostly railroad workers and their families. June 2, 1879, it was announced that a rail line be built to neighbouring community in Vanceboro, Maine, 10 km away. The contract was awarded for approx. $30,000. Soon after, a road was built that ran parallel to the tracks. The rail line and road remain in use today

In 1894 the parishes of Prince William and Dumfries were merged into a new parish known as the Parish of McAdam. In 1889, the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) built the International Railway of Maine: the final link making it the first transcontinental railway. The following year, the CPR leased the New Brunswick Railway for nine hundred ninety-nine years. The CPR began an ambitious construction project on a massive station/hotel at the junction in 1900; construction was completed in 1901 and expanded in 1911. The station became the dominant feature of the settlement and would go on to be a major employer for the junction, heralding a period of growth.

World War I and II both had a staunch impact on the community. Trains carrying soldiers east to ports such as Halifax passed through McAdam. Trains often stopped for inspection and servicing at the station and demand for workers caused the population in the town to continue to rise. In 1915, a German agent, Werner Horn, attempted to destroy the international railroad bridge between Vanceboro, Maine and St. Croix, New Brunswick - immediately west of McAdam - in order to limit the movements of war supplies to the port of Saint John. His attempt proved futile, as the bridge was not severely damaged and was returned to service several days later.

The change from steam locomotives to diesel locomotives during the 1950s proved to be devastating for McAdam's economy. Trains no longer needed to stop as frequently for service and the railway station in McAdam lost the importance it once had. New highways constructed after the war saw trucks and automobiles reduce the need for the branch lines to St. Stephen, St. Andrews and Woodstock. Local passenger trains from McAdam to these destinations were canceled in the early 1960s, leaving The Atlantic Limited as McAdam's only remaining passenger train. These changes in turn caused the station's hotel to close later in the decade.

Already suffering from new technological developments and its isolation from any other reliable source of employment, McAdam was devastated after the CPR transferred operation of its passenger service to Via Rail Canada in 1978. In 1981, Via cancelled the Atlantic, although it was revived in 1985 before being permanently cancelled in December 1994, whereby CPR closed the station. In January 1995, CPR transferred ownership of the building to the village at the same time as it sold its rail lines through the village to the New Brunswick Southern Railway.

Recent fundraising efforts by the village has resulted in renovations and restoration efforts for the station, which is now a museum and tourist attraction for the community. The village hosted the 2009 New Brunswick Day in an effort to generate awareness of the community's rich history.

Geography and climate
McAdam is located in the New Brunswick Highlands.

Demographics
In the 2021 Census of Population conducted by Statistics Canada, McAdam had a population of $1,173$ living in $534$ of its $600$ total private dwellings, a change of NaN% from its 2016 population of $1,151$. With a land area of 14.19 km2, it had a population density of in 2021.

The first recorded population of McAdam came from the 1901 census, recording a population of 714 people. Over the next half-century as the rail operations in McAdam expanded, the population increased substantially: a result of the promise of employment. The population peaked in 1956 at 2,803 people: nearly four times that of the 1901 census. However, with the collapse of the rail industry in the village, the employment prospects dried up. Isolated, with no new source of jobs, the population began a steady decline: a process which has continued up to the present. Fifty years since its peak population, the number of persons living in McAdam has been more than halved.

Due to community spirit and leadership, the population of McAdam grew for the first time in a generation, starting in 2018. Growth has been attributed to selling lots for $1 and the expansion of the local campground. More recently, families have been flocking to McAdam looking for a small-town rural home, while also having amenities of the city such as schools, municipal water and sewer, and also all essential shopping needs.

Economy
McAdam's economy consists of well-rounded employment sectors, ranging from manufacturing, professional, public sector and healthcare. Tourism plays a role as well, welcoming over 30,000 visitors each year to the McAdam Train Station alone.

Certainteed Gypsum
The village's main employer is Certainteed Gypsum, which directly employs 57 employees, not including contract work, security or transportation drivers, which is believed to bring total employment to over 75 individuals. The McAdam Certainteed Gypsum plant manufactures a variety of wallboard, which is then sent to all regions of North America.

Soleno Maritimes Inc.
Soleno Inc. produces high-density polyethylene resin pipes used for storm drains and fittings that are shipped throughout Atlantic Canada. The plant employs 25 individuals. In 2013 the New Brunswick government invested $125,000 in payroll rebates to help replace its assembly line to keep production going

Healthcare
McAdam Health Centre, which is adjoined to Wauklehegan Manor, employs approximately 54 employees.

Entertainment
In 1965, the most watched movie in Mcadam was The Sound of Music at the Vogue Movie Theatre. One lucky viewer saw it 42 times. This movie theatre closed in 1988.

In 1994, Eatons filmed a television commercial at the train station 3 months before national train routes stopped.

In 2016, Jonny Harris made his celebrity debut at his show at Mcadam High School on CBC’s Still Standing.

Recreation
McAdam has a wide variety of recreation facilities that serve all ages. These facilities include, Youth Centre - Warriors Den, outdoor skating rink, tennis court, basketball court, walking trail, two gymnasiums, weight room, two baseball fields, two parks, seniors club and beach.

Notable people

 * Gregory Evans - first Integrity Commissioner for the province of Ontario
 * Heidi Hanlon - curler, 11-time provincial women's champion skip

title: McAdam, New Brunswick


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August 28 1101AMCDT NOAA Bulletin

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as validly transwikied. --Tony Sidaway Talk 10:20, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

August 28 1101AMCDT NOAA Bulletin
Listed as speedy candidate by an anon for already being transwikid, which isn't a CSD. My vote is delete, unencyclopaedic, but if wikisource wants it it might be worth for someone to check if it's been transwiki-ed. --fvw *  05:25, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to wikisource. Not encyclopedic, but still interesting. --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 06:00, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete/Transwiki per nom. --Alan Au 06:16, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Already at wikisource:August 28 2005 11:01 AM CDT NOAA Bulletin. —Cryptic (talk) 13:49, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Cryptic's link shows source text was already transwikied appropriately. Barno 22:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, the transwiki is enough. Note that being transwikied as a result of a VfD is a speedy criterion, but this was not VfD'd.-Splash 22:48, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, this information has no business on its own page. There is too little useful info and that info will soon be outdated. It's basically just posting one of the National Hurricane Center's advisories as its own article. --E. Brown, Hurricane enthusiast - Squawk Box 03:38, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete maybe merge with another related article or trans to another wiki. Certainly notable, somewhere. CoolGuy 05:29, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into Hurricane Katrina, and let it stay there after that page has settled down. It was a true mass meme, on the Internet and in mass media, but only for one day. It is notable (I mean that in the colloquial sense, not the Wikipedia sense) for being the most terrifying NOAA bulletin in history, but it only had currency for about 12 hours. If it belongs anywhere, it's in the Hurricane Katrina article as a footnote to history. MCB 05:38, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwikied already to wikisource:August_28_2005_11:01_AM_CDT_NOAA_Bulletin. This is a most unusual statement by NOAA, sounding almost like the The War of the Worlds broadcast, so it should be preserved. Merging into Katrina would be inappropriate, since the page has already had to be split due to its large size. Close nomination and state result as transwiki. --Tito xd 05:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to Wikisource.--Kross 13:56, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or rename. This will be a historic document that accompanied the mandatory evacuation in New Orleans and hence save tens (if not hundreds) thousands of lives. It's effect is hugh and something to write about. --Vsion 17:56, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * So is the Principia Mathematica. That doesn't mean we should have a copy of it on wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base or a repository of public domain material. --fvw *  01:38, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or rename. Same reasons above. --CFIF 01:15, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't see how an article on this document is expandable. By all means, mention in Hurricane Katrina that the NOAA report's tone was unusual, and link to it on Wikisource, but a separate article about the document is analogous to having articles about press releases as well as the events they describe.  See also Don't include copies of primary sources. —Cryptic (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I guess Declaration of Independence (United States) should be merged and deleted then.--Vsion 18:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
User talk:Aremisasling

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! pamri 05:26, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Animal cats
Hi. The categories are nested within each other. If something is in Category:Pleistocene mammals, it doesn't need to also be in Category:Pleistocene life. It's a redundancy. --DanielCD 19:32, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

 * If you think you can improve on what's there, by all means go for it. Sounds like a good idea. --DanielCD 19:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Smilodon
It was a reversion error on my part, and I've reverted myself. Thanks for the heads up. :) – ClockworkSoul 02:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

 * No worries, thanks for the quick response. I've removed my post on your talk page and responded in the discussion page for the Smilodon.  Keep up the good work. --aremisasling 04:08, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Categories - Life through Geological Time
Hi Aremisasling

I like your idea of having a nested epochal classification of living organisms through time. I've been making a few new categories along the lines you suggest. My only concern is with your definition of "animal". By "animal" do you mean metazoan (scientific definition), vertebrate, tetrapod (common definition, e.g. many people think of insects as "bugs" rather than "animals"), "higher" tetrapod, mammal, or what?

Hmm, ok i just re-read what you wrote on your user page - you include echinoderms, worms, etc under animal (the proper scientific definition). Duhh, should've read more carefully the first time before saying the above! Ok, my suggestion now is that your kingdom-based classification is much too broad. It means that we wouldn't have more than two or three subcategories under " life" - protists, plants, and animals (fungi are poorly represented in the fossil record, and prokaryotes aren't very interesting in the Phanerozoic). This results in an unnecessary large number of nested categories, which makes it tedious clickling though each one. It would be much better imho to just have the top classification as "Life" (which you have), and under that have the phylum and, where necessary, class level classification.

The category "animals" can still be kept as a colloquial term for what the man in the street recognises as an animal (generally a tetrapod)

It might also be an idea (if we are to do this in a serious way) to scrap the term "prehistoric" as in archeology etc it refers to paleolithic, neolithic, and so on (i.e. before history).

M Alan Kazlev 08:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

List of private spaceflight companies
I've just tabulated the lists; what do you think? — Jack · talk · 01:27, Thursday, 30 August 2007

Rasmussen/Election Polls
Sorry, I didn't notice your talk page comment on the polling page. I do think daily updates are too much. What do you think about weekly updates for both Rasmussen and Gallup? I do agree that something regular should be worked out, so that it doesn't just get updated when an editor sees a poll that support his/her candidate! Gilbertine goldmark (talk) 17:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Aremisasling/monobook.js"
A page you created, Aremisasling/monobook.js, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Scope of the "List of private spaceflight companies" article
Hi Aremisasling. There is an interesting, and much needed, discussion going on at Talk:List_of_private_spaceflight_companies. Since you have previously contributed to the List of private spaceflight companies page, I wanted to invite you to join the conversation. N2e (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Thanks for all your input to the discussion to date. Please see me comment on the recent significant change to the article name/scope by another (quite well-intentioned) editor, and my proposal for what to do about it. N2e (talk) 14:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Thanks very much for your input to the discussion on Talk:List_of_private_spaceflight_companies. Much appreciated.  And then further thanks for taking the consensus and moving the article name back to the consensus position, i.e., what it was before the recent "move".  I think that article is back in good (interim) order and will improve over time as it evolves in Wikipedia fashion.

 * I believe it will be useful to stop and have a meta-discussion to hash out the issue of the scope of Private spaceflight or privately-funded space or NewSpace, and that this will likely affect several WP articles. To that end, I have made an initial proposal to get started on  both Talk:NewSpace and on Talk:Private spaceflight.  You are invited to participate.  And if you know other similarly interested editors, please do let them know as well.  After we figure out which TalkPage to have our discussion, it would be helpful if you would perhaps invite some other editors who have engaged with you previously on this topic as I can see you've been trying to get this going for some time.  As they say in Australia, "Good on ya."  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 05:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Article move
I have reverted your move of Conestoga (rocket) because it does not comply with the proper guidelines: WP:RND. If you wish for there to be an article on the company, then create one because this is the article for the rockets. You should also not move pages without discussing them first. -MBK004 17:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
 G W … 19:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Template:Digit time between
What does Template:Digit time between do? If you are testing it, would you please move it to your userspace? Thank you. Btilm Happy Holidays! 18:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

List of private spaceflight companies
If you have a chance, please take another look at Talk:List_of_private_spaceflight_companies. You expressed opinions on this article back in December and would appreciate your continued interaction on some newer comments. N2e (talk) 13:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Spaceflight portals
Hello! As an member editor of one or more of the Spaceflight, Human spaceflight, Unmanned spaceflight, Timeline of spaceflight or Space colonisation WikiProjects, I'd like to draw to your attention a proposal I have made with regards to the future of the spaceflight-related portals, which can be found at Portal talk:Spaceflight. I'd very much appreciate any suggestions or feedback you'd be able to offer! Many thanks,

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Human spaceflight at 08:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC).

WikiProject Spaceflight activity
Hello there! As part of an effort to determine how many active editors are present in the spaceflight-related WikiProjects, changes have been made to the list of members of WikiProject Spaceflight. If you still consider yourself to be an active editor in this project, it would be appreciated if you would please edit the list so that your name is not struck out - thus a clearer idea of the number of active editors can be determined. Many thanks in advance!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 17:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 0

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 16:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 1

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 14:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC).

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Recent extinctions
Category:Recent extinctions, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ucucha 19:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

The Downlink: Issue 2

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 3

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Spaceflight at 09:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC).

Wikipagan?
Hi, rummaging through old communications on my Talk page and ran across yours. Looking you up (I'm always interested in what smart people have to say), I found this on your page:

*WikiPagan - a WikiCities project covering subjects of interest to Pagans from a Pagan perspective. Launched in early 2005. Currently only a few contributors.

Can I trouble you for the URL?

Best regards,

* Septegram * Talk * Contributions * 18:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

 * Sure! I haven't been editing there or really all that much here on Wikipedia for some time due to personal commitments, but the site still seems to be fairly active.  It used to be pagan.wikicities.com, but it has been moved to [pagan.wikia.com].  aremisasling (talk) 18:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

 * Thank you kindly!
 * * Septegram * Talk * Contributions * 19:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polybutadiene acrylonitrile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SLS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

No one, least of all me, is trying to keep you out of longevity. Various editors are using various tools to clean up that area, which includes seeking enforcement of DS. We need more editors with broader editing experience outside the topic to participate. Legacypac (talk) 20:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't suspect you were targeting me in specific or targeting anyone in specific, for that matter. But I did see a lot of people being referred for disciplinary action up to and including topic bans.  And whether or not they deserved it I was pretty nervous about having one slip get me in the same boat.  Not because I thought you had it in for me, but for the same reason I get nervous when a police officer is behind me on the road.  I'm a good driver, but it just takes one slip up for the lights to come on.  That's not something I've felt on Wikipedia before and it was certainly something I felt in the proceedings on Longevity.  Whether or not that was the intent is a different matter altogether.  In the end Longevity is an interest of mine, but not one I'm willing to get a ban over, so I stayed out of it.  aremisasling (talk) 17:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Scorpius Space Launch Company for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scorpius Space Launch Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scorpius Space Launch Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Quadraxis (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of SpiralScouts International for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SpiralScouts International, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/SpiralScouts International until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Triassic mammals

A tag has been placed on Category:Triassic mammals indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aremisasling


text:
Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured list nominations

This is a list of all Wikipedians who have nominated an article accepted as a featured list. The list is ordered by decreasing number of (accepted) featured list nominations, alphabetically by user name in case of ties. Each ★ (Unicode black star character) corresponds to (and is linked to) a featured list. Former featured lists are indicated by rust -colored stars.

This list is generated from by-year summary lists, for example Featured lists promoted in 2024.


text:
Talk:Heathenry (new religious movement)

Vandalism at Simple English Wikipedia's "Asatru" article
The Simple Wikipedia article "Asatru" could use more eyes. I reverted some pretty juvenile but extensive vandalism that was there for days before I saw it and I happened on it by chance. :bloodofox: (talk) 02:20, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Too Generalized?
Should all these different beliefs be plopped together in one page? Many of these beliefs have vastly different core values. Gurluas (talk) 19:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Of course, there's a great deal of variation within Heathenry, but the same could be said of almost any sufficiently large religion. Think of the huge internal diversity within Christianity, for example. We wouldn't break up the Christianity article just because the Jesuits, Positive Christianity, and Mormonism all seem very different from one another. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Yeah but all of those beliefs share core values, such as the belief in Jesus or their God. This is the equivalent of making a monotheistic article and plopping Zoroastrianism, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism in the same article and removing their respective articles. Norse Paganism is entirely different from Greek Paganism, or Celtic Paganism. Gurluas (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * This article doesn't discuss Greek or Celtic-oriented Paganisms, only Germanic-oriented ones. In contemporary contexts, Heathenry refers to Germanic-oriented modern Paganisms, and the article makes this quite clear. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Gurluas Hence why there isn't significant Celtic or Hellenic information? Hellenism is only referenced as an example of a cognate term and the history between the two groups, Celtic Paganism is only mentioned in the 'See Also'? FarHarBard (talk) 14:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Asatru-Eu Network
There is a section I would like to add to the page but not exactly sure how. It should definitely be at the modern developments section, but there where exactly, not sure (maybe after the text deals with czech communities).

"An important, transnational project also emerged in Europe under the name of Asatru-Eu Network in the 2000s. This loose alliance of more than a dozen local groups organises the International Ásatrú Summer Camp from time to time and aims to create stronger bond between the communities of the continent."

And the reference would be this website: https://www.asatru-summercamp.org/asatru-eu-network/

I thank for your help, would come in handy. Ingwar98 (talk) 22:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

 * You cannot use the project's own website as a source. You must use third-party source such as reliable news sites, academic journals and books as sources. Most brand new small organizations won't have reliable sources for twenty or more years, if they survive that long. Unless there are third-party sources, the org doesn't meet our most basic notability requirements. Skyerise (talk) 22:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, I am sorry! THe reason why I resorted to it, as it was included in another wikipedia page with similar self-reference (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heathenry_in_the_United_Kingdom), and also because many of the asatru communities that have official wikipedia pages, also declare themselves as members of this alliance-organisation on their official websites. But then I try to find some third-party reference, if there is any at all. Ingwar98 (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

 * I've tagged that for review. An organization's website should really only be used as a source in an article about itself - if there are sufficient third-party sources to support that it is notable. Material shouldn't be inserted into another article unless based on third-party sources, so that section you mention seems to be promotional and should probably be reduced to a sentence or two that can be supported by third-party sources. Skyerise (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Kindly point to a source
Editor, would you kindly point to a single source cited in the body of the article that says anything like "those Heathens who espouse folkish and far-right perspectives tend to favor the terms Odinism, Wotanism, Wodenism, or Odalism". I can't find one. Stringing multiple sources together (not saying that's the case) to support that statement would surely be synthesis, wouldn't it? Carlstak (talk) 01:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

 * If it's needed, we can add in "" which at states that Odinism and Wodenism are typically used by neo-völkisch groups. On the Othala page we also have references linking Odalism and those who espouse racist forms of heathenry. Ingwina (talk) 06:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

 * The final paragraph of the "Terminology" sub-section provides citations for these claims regarding terms like "Odinism" and "Wodenism". As is Wikipedia policy, the lead summarises the content of the article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Heathenry (new religious movement)


text:
User talk:Zeus Guy

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Flowerparty 05:29, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Lists of Pokémon characters
Thanks for uploading the image for Winona on List of Hoenn Gym Leaders. Just remember, though, when you upload an image for a Pokémon article, please add with the explanation of the image, so there's a proper copyright notice. That way, they don't get listed on WP:IFD as unfree images. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 20:47, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

IFD
Image:0188.jpg and Image:0189.jpg have been listed on WP:IFD. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sonic Mew | talk to me 19:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:0025.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:0025.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:AG113.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AG113.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Zelda Wizzrobe.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Zelda Wizzrobe.png. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:AG137.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AG137.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:AG300.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AG300.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:ALTTP Wizzrobe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ALTTP Wizzrobe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:HackShugo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HackShugo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:HackOuka.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HackOuka.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:HackHotaru.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HackHotaru.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:HackAIBuster.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HackAIBuster.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mario Party 5 Box Art.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Mario Party 5 Box Art.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AG329.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AG329.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:0225.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:0225.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ash-Totodile.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ash-Totodile.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AG246.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AG246.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AG278.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AG278.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:0222.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:0222.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:0222.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:0222.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jay32183 01:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:0070.JPG)
 Thanks for uploading Image:0070.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jay32183 20:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:0025.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:0025.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jay32183 20:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HackHotaru.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:HackHotaru.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HackOuka.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:HackOuka.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HackShugo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:HackShugo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mireille.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mireille.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:0185.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:0185.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HackRena.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:HackRena.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vulpix-Anime.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vulpix-Anime.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ToSBox PS2.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ToSBox PS2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:HackAIBuster.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HackAIBuster.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. KirtZJ (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HackAIBuster.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:HackAIBuster.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zeus Guy


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demarcation

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus Jtkiefer  T - 22:16, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Demarcation
Dictdef, already on wiktionary apparantly. --fvw *  05:29, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Alan Au 06:16, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with border or something? Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 06:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Needs more discussion. Relisting on 10 Sep. --Tony Sidaway Talk  10:30, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete as per nom. Justinc 13:19, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Wasn't there something like demarcation lines or zones or somethings in WW1? -Splash 21:02, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, because it needs to explain what the demarcation problem is but it shoudn't just be a redirect. Kappa 22:10, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Communist Students League of Sweden (Marxist–Leninists)

Why the heck does this article exist? At the very least, it's a badly-written stub. It contains one date and one other number. Who cares about an organisation that had fewer than 100 members and hasn't existed for 25 years? If someone interesting belonged to it, or the group did anything interesting, maybe this would be worth it, but really! So it existed; big deal.

 * well, you obviously bothered to read it? Also, concerning the number of members, that was the registration of SÄPO, not the total membership. --Soman 15:54, 3 September 2005 (UTC)


text:
Giant axonal neuropathy

Giant axonal neuropathy is a rare, autosomal recessive neurological disorder that causes disorganization of neurofilaments. Neurofilaments form a structural framework that helps to define the shape and size of neurons and are essential for normal nerve function. A distinguishing feature is its association with kinky, or curly, hair; in such cases it has been called Giant axonal neuropathy with curly hair.

Genetics
Giant axonal neuropathy results from mutations in the GAN gene, which codes for the protein gigaxonin. This alters the shape of the protein, changing how it interacts with other proteins when organizing the structure of the neuron.

Neurons affected by the altered protein accumulate excess neurofilaments in the axon, the long extension from the nerve cell that transmits its signal to other nerve cells and to muscles. These enlarged or 'giant' axons cannot transmit signals properly, and eventually deteriorate, resulting in the range of neurological anomalies associated with the disorder.

This disease is an autosomal recessive disorder, which means the defective gene is located on an autosome, and both parents must have one copy of the defective gene in order to have a child born with the disorder. The parents of a child with an autosomal recessive disorder are carriers, but are usually not affected by the disorder.

Diagnosis
Giant axonal neuropathy usually appears in infancy or early childhood, and is progressive. Early signs of the disorder often present in the peripheral nervous system, causing individuals with this disorder to have problems walking. Later, normal sensation, coordination, strength, and reflexes become affected. Hearing or vision problems may also occur. Abnormally kinky hair is characteristic of giant axonal neuropathy, appearing in almost all cases. As the disorder progresses, central nervous system becomes involved, which may cause a gradual decline in mental function, loss of control of body movement, and seizures.

title: Giant axonal neuropathy


text:
Symphony No. 16 (Mozart)

Symphony No. 16 in C major, K. 128, was the first of three symphonies composed by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in May 1772 when Mozart was sixteen years old. This symphony is one of many written during the period in which Mozart stayed in Salzburg, between two trips to Italy. The autograph of the score is preserved in the Berlin State Library.

Structure
The symphony has the basic scoring of two oboes, two horns in C, and strings.

The form is that of a standard three-movement Italian overture:

 * 1) Allegro maestoso,
 * 2) Andante grazioso, G major
 * 3) Allegro,

The first movement, which a C major essay in sonata form, sounds at first to be in due to the presence of triplets. However, as it enters the second half of the exposition section it becomes clear that the movement's meter is actually. The development section is short, but filled with dense modulations. Some of this developmental spirit carries over into recapitulation, which turns out not to be perfectly literal.

The oboes and horns drop out of the second movement, which is another essay in sonata form, written for the strings alone. They return, however, for the third movement, in C major, which is a cheerful dance cast in an altered rondo form, with a coda.

title: Symphony No. 16 (Mozart)


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Venom's Creature Feature

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 00:28, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Vincent Venom's Creature Feature
No evidence of notability. --fvw *  05:31, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * And full of placeholder links and nothing links there. DELETE -- Cdyson37 12:11, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. And the "Articles for deletion" page is redirecting somewhere else for this. --  Etacar11   02:06, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, I fixed it. -- Etacar11   02:07, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Apologies. I got myself very confused, and thought I had fixed it. -Splash 02:20, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:City of Bankstown

Separate page for the Local Government Area
As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the City of Bankstown, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 05:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Suburb listing
Is the suburb listing in some order that I don't quite understand, or would it be ok for me to sort it alphabetically? Enochlau 03:32, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * No, not at all. Feel free to go right ahead. Regards -- Ianblair23 08:51, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Bansktown Airport surburb?
So Bankstown Airport is officially a suburb? Should we list it as one then? -- Newhoggy | Talk 13:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes it is, however "officially" it is Bankstown Aeorodome. Eliethesame 09:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Major features of Bankstown

 * Bankstown Airport
 * Bankstown Hospital - Opened in 1957
 * Bankstown Paceway
 * Bankstown Square Shopping Centre
 * Dunc Gray Velodrome
 * Georges River Foreshore Walkway/Cycleway
 * Industrial areas of Chullora, Padstow and Milperra
 * Georges River National Park
 * Potts Hill Reservoirs
 * Southern Sydney Institute of TAFE (Bankstown and Padstow Colleges)
 * University of Western Sydney
 * Villawood detention centre

Bankstown Community Directory 2015

 * Area and bounds.
 * Climate: maximum and minimum temperatures throughout the year.
 * Rainfall: amount throughout the year.
 * Land use: Residential, recreation, special, industrial/business/commercial.
 * Population: 2001 census.
 * Topography and vegetation.
 * Timeline from 1795 discovery to 2014 opening of Bankstown Library and Knowledge Centre

Historical Tour of the Bankstown District
5th Edition Published by the Bankstown Historical Society 1991

Introduction
Excerpt from "The New South Wales Gazzetteer of 1866.

 * "BANKSTOWN. 13 miles S.W. from Sydney on the Souther Road. The George's River (brackish) flows....

 * "The nearest places are Liverpool - 7 miles S.Sw and Burwood-Enfield....

 * "Bankstown is the name of one of the original districts of the country....

In contrast to some modern statistics; references to Bankstown Square and Compass centre.

 * Do you think the copyright of the excerpt from the Gazzetteer would have expired by now?

Timeline of Bankstown
These dates listed as significant: 1795, 1797, 1798, 1810, 1814, 1818, 1826, 1834/6, 1853, 1863, 1880, 1886, 1889, 1895, 1899, 1909, 1923, 1926, 1954, 1957, 1959, 1963, 1966, 1973, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1988, 1990, 1991

Roads
Roberts road was named after William Roberts who had contracted to build the Liverpool Road.

Links

 * http://bankstowncity.nsw.gov.au/rec/index.cfm

Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Coucils
Auburn Council, Bankstown City Council, Baulkham Hills Shire Council, Blacktown City Council, Blue Mountains City Council, Camden Council, Campbelltown City Council, Fairfield City Council, Hawkesbury City Council, Holroyd City Council, Liverpool City Council, Parramatta City Council, Penrith City Council

Infobox Update
This page has had its infobox updated to Infobox Australian Place. This update has been automatically preformed by TheJoshBot. Please be aware that poorly filled templates can have infomation lost in the transition that is unknown to the bot. Check the page history for more infomation. The following infomation has been lost in the transition, and will need to be converted to the document prose:

Region change?
In most property guides, Bankstown is always located within the Canterbury-Bankstown region, not the South West region, look at the Herald, Domain.com.au, realestate.com.au or the annual property guides. Shouldn't it be changed to the Canterbury-Bankstown region? Also, shouldn't a new region for Canterbury-Bankstown be added seeing how it's being used in all property guides now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.139.186 (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Burdenism
This word is used in the article, and i cannot figure out what is meant by it. there is some use of "white mans burdenism" on the internet, but ive never heard that phrase before, and in context with multiculturalism, it may come off as some sort of slight. perhaps its a local term (im not australian). Unless someone can explain it, i will probably remove it as either meaningless or potentially an act of vandalism. also, the link at Burdenese is to google, very suspect.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * removed. no such group.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Bankstown Bunker
I'm not sure why this section is in the article - it doesn't seem to have anything to do with the local council? It would seem to be a better fit for the Bankstown article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:43, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on City of Bankstown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080719102204/http://www.tonystewartmp.net/8_5_08.html to http://www.tonystewartmp.net/8_5_08.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on City of Bankstown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050622153110/http://bankstowncity.nsw.gov.au/coun/about/yesterday.cfm to http://www.bankstowncity.nsw.gov.au/coun/about/yesterday.cfm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131028121745/http://strategies.planning.nsw.gov.au/MetropolitanStrategyforSydney.aspx to http://strategies.planning.nsw.gov.au/MetropolitanStrategyforSydney.aspx
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20070829214439/http://www.bankstown.nsw.gov.au/coun/about/developmentOverTime.cfm to http://www.bankstown.nsw.gov.au/coun/about/developmentOverTime.cfm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829181140/http://www.bankstown.nsw.gov.au/RequestFile.cfm?FileIs=BCCSisterCitybro.pdf to http://www.bankstown.nsw.gov.au/RequestFile.cfm?FileIs=BCCSisterCitybro.pdf
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20080806080731/http://www.bankstown.nsw.gov.au/Shijiazhuang/default.aspx to http://www.bankstown.nsw.gov.au/Shijiazhuang/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:City of Bankstown


text:
User talk:Fatcheson

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Flowerparty 05:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fatcheson


text:
File:Tenshi No Gijinka.jpg

Summary
Cover artwork for Keiji Haino's Tenshi No Gijinka LP.

title: File:Tenshi No Gijinka.jpg


text:
User talk:Theargsite

The ARG Site
The ARG site is the newest of the "Maddox Knock-offs" (as of August 2005). Although, it is not a complete Knock-off. The ARG Site has a lot of originality, but still keeps with the same, basic idea as Maddox's website. It is updated often and the articles range from Hateful to Hilarious.

http://www.bjc.xstorm.co.uk/arg or, if link is broken, use www.theargsite.tk

title: User talk:Theargsite


text:
User talk:Nokhodi

Question for administrator

--Nokhodi (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hallo there Nokhodi (talk), got across your request for help. I am not an administrator but here is a link on WP:AIAV where you could request an Administrator intervention against vandalism. I hope this helps.   M  aurice    C arbonaro    08:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

 * I have left a warning on User talk:Reza.lagsharidze. If the user continues to make such edits, please ping me or again request admin assistance.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  16:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

 * Thank you for the very quick reply and help. Much appreciated. Nokhodi (talk) 06:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Talk page
Please consider archiving your talk page, as it is very long. See Help:Archiving a talk page. If unsure how to proceed, please leave a note on my talkpage, and I'll assist you.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  16:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Hazfi Cup
Can you create more seasons of Hazfi Cup ? And also try and correct the template of Hazfi Cup seasons, there are many seasons missing. Thanks!--Alexiulian25 (talk) 12:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I would love to if there was more verified data available. Thanks.Nokhodi (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Amfciran.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Amfciran.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 31 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Vahid Amiri page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=702637553 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F702637553%7CVahid Amiri%5D%5D Ask for help])

Orphaned non-free image File:Esteghlalahvazfcpic.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Esteghlalahvazfcpic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iran national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Iran_national_football_team check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Iran_national_football_team?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Masoud Shojaei
Hi there, from Portugal,

OK, you say in your summary one of the players has returned, but that does not mean both were not suspended for a time. Content is sourced, please leave the storyline be.

Attentively, happy editing --Quite A Character (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

 * I think i was polite and tried to interact and/or improve the article, but fair enough (no reply). Sorry to bother you, goodbye. --Quite A Character (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

 * Hello, Please do not take my lack of a reply as silence. Appreciate the feedback. Take care. Nokhodi (talk) 20:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

No worries! Sorry for being so hasty, take care as well. --Quite A Character (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Request to help in Discussion
Please help us in this Discussion. Shahin (talk) 11:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashkan Dejagah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azerbaijani ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ashkan_Dejagah check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ashkan_Dejagah?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Paykanfootballlogo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Paykanfootballlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

"Iranian Club Football Seaon by Season Top Goalscorers" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iranian Club Football Seaon by Season Top Goalscorers. Since you had some involvement with the Iranian Club Football Seaon by Season Top Goalscorers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC  678  16:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Iran football labelled map
Template:Iran football labelled map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nokhodi


text:
Talk:Municipality of Ashfield

Separate page for the Local Government Area
As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the Municipality of Ashfield, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 05:33, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

First suburb to propose 30 km/h speed limit...
The Inner West Weekly of 8 June 2006 reports that "Ashfield Council Deputy Mayor Nick Adams" moved (at Tuesday night's council meeting) that Ashfield be "the first residential council in Australia to lower its residential speed limit to 30km/h". The proposal would need the backing of the RTA, and would not include the following roads/streets (due to their high volume): Parramatta, Liverpool, Frederick, Elizabeth. -- Juliannechat 9 June 2006

Infobox Update
This page has had its infobox updated to Infobox Australian Place. This update has been automatically preformed by TheJoshBot. Please be aware that poorly filled templates can have infomation lost in the transition that is unknown to the bot. Check the page history for more infomation. The following infomation has been lost in the transition, and will need to be converted to the document prose:

Nick Adams
I hid (rather than removed) the controversies section for the following reasons: I think that, if the person is notable (and a local politician probably is), then the controversies as currently listed should be at Nick Adams (Councillor) rather than Municipality of Ashfield. LordVetinari (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * As it was written, the section read like a list of criticisms of one councillor. "Cr Nick Adams this... Cr Nick Adams that... Deputy Mayor Nick Adams something else..." For that reason, I slightly rewrote the section to de-emphasise the list aspect.
 * Being an article about a place, a list of controversies about a particular person is out of place. It wouldn't be an issue if the section referred to controversies concerning multiple people or, especially, the entire council considered together.

 * I've raised this at WP:BLPN. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

 * A ridiculous WP:COATRACK section about an individual not remotely notable by Wikipedia standards - and as such a clear violation of WP:BLP policy. If it is added again, delete it, and if the deletion is contested, raise it again at WP:BLPN. Wikipedia isn't here to act as a forum for such unencyclopaedic trivia. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Adams has now become notable in the States, so I've created Nick Adams (commentator). Happy to have people more knowledgeable about his background pitching in (subject to all BLP rules of course, because the guy made some colorful choices in life)--Milowent • hasspoken  13:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Protected
Please discuss here or at BLP/N. Black Kite (talk) 19:16, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

history section
Just listing here as an idea for article improvement. LibStar (talk) 13:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Municipality of Ashfield


text:
Talk:City of Auburn

Deputy Mayor's car accident
It is just an accident. The guy is an independent. He is a developer. It might be the biggest mistake of his life in a $half million car, or the start of a pattern. Here is a news article on it. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/brakes-put-on-spinning-ferrari-driver/story-e6freuy9-1226501651818 DDB (talk) 06:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Separate page for the Local Government Area
As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for Auburn Council, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 05:34, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Should this perhaps be called Municipality of Auburn? Auburn council is the local government, not the local government area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.76.24 (talk) 14:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Infobox Update
This page has had its infobox updated to Infobox Australian Place. This update has been automatically preformed by TheJoshBot. Please be aware that poorly filled templates can have infomation lost in the transition that is unknown to the bot. Check the page history for more infomation. The following infomation has been lost in the transition, and will need to be converted to the document prose:

Auburn is now a City
The article will need to be updated and renamed. Not sure who is happy to have a crack at this. Mustard Pot (talk) 06:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Article on Selim Mehajer has been deleted?
Hi all, it appears that an admin has deleted the article on Selim Mehajer and created a new redirect back to City of Auburn. I have noted this seems very much out of process on WP:AN/I, but I thought I'd register a complaint here. Selim is very much a public figure in Australia, and it is quite unfortunate that no article exists about him on Wikipedia because whenever you look for a summary of who he is and what he has done no neutral or well sourced article can be found.

At the very least, I would expect that if he isn't a notable figure then it should be discussed on WP:AFD before the article is summarily deleted. If there are any other people who agree with me, please feel free to respond to this comment because at the very least I would appreciate more transparency around admin decision making than has occured here. - Letsbefiends (talk) 22:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

 * It was actually taken to AfD and speedy deleted here. Given the massive, sustained amounts of coverage he's received since then, I'd support an article. Frickeg (talk) 03:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

 * Me too. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * See Salim Mehajer. 220  of  Borg 05:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:City of Auburn


text:
Tenshi No Gijinka

Tenshi No Gijinka is an album by Japanese musician Keiji Haino, released on John Zorn's Tzadik label in 1995. The album features nine untitled pieces, consisting of Haino's voice and percussion.

Reception
In a review for AllMusic, Joslyn Layne wrote: "Focusing entirely on percussion and vocals, Haino builds a unique, meditative space out of drones, cymbal smacks, rings, and reverberations. Bizarre yet also beautiful, Haino creates a personalized and esoteric ritual that alternately serves as repeated tension release and representation of the inner sounds of existence. The result is a captivating immersion in sustains and overtone."

Writing for Red Bull Music Academy, Jon Dale commented: "The nakedness of much of this music, combined with the processional movement of some of the drums, gives Tenshi No Gijinka a particularly abstracted, ritualistic tenor: with Haino's best albums, you’re relocated to another zone of experience."

title: Tenshi No Gijinka


text:
Trek

Trek may refer to:

Art and entertainment

 * Trek (band), Russian rock band
 * Trek (TV channel), a French TV channel
 * Star Trek, a science fiction franchise

Companies

 * Trek Airways, an airline
 * Trek Bicycle Corporation, a bicycle manufacturer

Other uses

 * Great Trek, a 19th-century migration of Africa's Boers
 * the Trek experiment, UC Berkeley, on board STS-74
 * KCNK2, otherwise known as the TREK-1 potassium channel

title: Trek


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software Development Kit (SDK)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Software development kit. -Splash 20:29, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Software Development Kit (SDK)
Dictdef. --fvw *  05:35, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Software development kit. --Alan Au 06:15, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Wfm, change vote to redirect. --fvw *  06:20, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per Alan Au. — J I P | Talk 06:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect. the wub  "?/!"  12:13, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect or better still just delete and change the link on F5 Networks (the only thing that links to it anyway) to the correct page -- Cdyson37 12:16, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per everyone. Optichan 19:39, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Armill

Untitled
Are they Armills or Armrills? Beyond me. Liastnir

2007-01-31 Automated pywikipediabot message
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:Armill


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Society of Impending Doom

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by TheCoffee on August 30, 2005. --Tito xd 05:17, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

The Society of Impending Doom
Unverifiable, probable hoax. --fvw *  05:36, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, appears to be a test page. the wub  "?/!"  12:16, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


text: User talk:69.181.199.70

title: User talk:69.181.199.70