text:
User talk:Jedi6

 ''Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting  --~  at the end. [ Start a new talk topic.]''

 ''Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.''

fall of crouscant
it had nothing to do with the book the book took place in abuot 25 ABY and this happened during the clone wars

Johnstown article
It now seems that the two editors are removing everything because it might be in a suburb of Johnstown you might want to take a look at the edit history and see. Darthgriz 9 8  19:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Friend
I added your name to this. Check it out and put your sig over my generic link, if you don't mind your name being there. Thanks! the_ed17 (T) (P)(F)(W)  02:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Come join us at the WarWiki Jedi6! You can write about real wars AND fictional wars (i.e. Star Wars) !!!!! So you might have a ton of fun there. I dunno. the_ed17 (T) (P)(F)(W)  17:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Nintendo-Portal Notice
You listed yourself as a member of Wikiproject Nintendo. Please do see This proposal for a nintendo Portal.-- A c1983fan  ( talk  •  contribs ) 19:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Brazil4Linux never dies
I bet that other admins are already involved with Mexico4Linux and Canada4Linux. He's actually followed me into Canadian politician articles (just to disrupt by whatever means necessary).

BTW, what happened to Daniel Davis? GoldDragon 00:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Johnstown?
Do you live in Johnstown? — Deckill e r 07:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No Jedi6  -(need help?)  04:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Catagories
How would one go about making a catagory? For example: Jedi with green light-sabers? Thank you more than you could ever know. -Shadow the Edge-hog 03:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars ship names
Hey, Coredesat! I've read your comments on the aformentioned articles. Please explain your thinking more to me, as your definately have more experience than I. If necessary, I'll add a description for every ship: it's condensed history, commander, accomplishments, famous battles it was at, and where it was destroyed.

Thanks,

RelentlessRouge 11:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

"Publisher's description" and "Inside front cover" sections in Star Wars issue articles
I just got a little ... uhh ... reprimand I guess for my additions of the afforementioned stuff to articles, with the accusation of copyright infringement and all that. I kinda took them as being Fair Use, but a little wary at first about the front cover stuff, then when nobody said anything to the contrary for a while, just went with it from there. Soooooo, I guess what I'm getting at is that I just want a second opinion, and you've been some help to me in the past, so I came to you. I've been trying to contact Dark Horse about this issue multiple times over the past month or so via their Contact Us page on their website (and more recently StarWars.com), but to no avail. Just wanted the ole second opinion before I went on a deletion crusade thru the masses of pages I've got descriptions and the like on. --Skope 03:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, and CovenantD is all about some merging of the issue articles from Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (comics), and he might end up going for the same at Republic, Empire, Legacy, Rebellion, X-Wing, etc. Any thoughts? --Skope 04:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Apocalypse
Can I become your apprentice? :P Gang  sta  E B help me improve! 19:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars WikiProject Roll Call
" Hello! "

Thank you for contributions. You have signed as a member of the Star Wars WikiProject there is a Roll Call going on currently at the Star Wars WikiProject talk page. Please sign if you still want to help out.

Again, Thank you for your help! --Team6and7 02:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppet request
Long time no see. I have a special request. Could you find out who the anon contributors belong to on Howard Moscoe? 201.78.252.196 and 201.78.252.196 GoldDragon 22:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Liberation of Naboo
I've added the "prod" template to the article Liberation of Naboo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Liberation of Naboo. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pascal.Tesson 01:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Doom 3: Reception
I do strongly support some of the criticism and rebuttal sections, though they are more the opinion of gaming experience instead of being strictly factual and sourceable. Do you think I've gone too far? --GoldDragon 04:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Cats and Dogs Portals
Hi, Jedi6. If you can offer some tips on the respective portal talk pages about how to improve Cats and Dogs up to "featured" quality, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Rfrisbietalk 18:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Star Wars books
Question: I was looking at the list and I was wondering what you thought of removing the links for the headers not all of them have links and it makes the page hard to read. For continuity, I thought it would be better not to have them. An example would be Jedi Apprentice Series it would look nicer without the link. Empress 4t 12:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

How do I file a formal complaint against a user?
Hello. You recently issued me a warning for attacking another user. However, the user is posting libelous remarks against me. You can see here that the person mentions me at the bottom. The person has made up this info or is twisting statements around to attack credibility without solid evidence. I would like to report it, but I have found no way to do so. I'm a member of the press and my site is reliable and this person is not basing his claims on facts, which I thought speculation or hearsay is not allowed. I know it is just a userpage, but I refuse to remove my tidbit about this user and the site he represents until he removes his remarks. Thanks. --TSA 06:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

 * I also posted rebuttals to his reliability claims, but I am not sure if he is allowed to remove those since it is "his" page. Would it be best to remove those from that page and post them on my own user talk page? --TSA 06:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Vortex
Excellent! Welcome back. — Deckiller 07:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Those are how many characters have been added/removed from the article (red = removed, green = added). Also, it's easier to spot vandalism now, because there are autoeditsummaries when people blank pages, revert, replace large amounts of text, etc. — Deckiller 07:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

User:JackSparrow Ninja/Source reliability
In response to User talk:JackSparrow Ninja
 * Hi Jedi 6,
 * As I've put in the top note:
 * This page is not intended to either praise sources or harm sources for who they are. This page is to reflect the nature of a source's reliability; a positive or negative comment is up to how they work: Wikipedia is not censored.
 * The fact that the webmaster has a Wikipedia account, obviously doesn't suddenly make him or the website more or less reliable. Though since he's since focussed his activities on his site, and people have stopped quoting him as a user (OR), I've corrected the header to reflect the website. It was not meant as a personal attack, those I always try to avoid.
 * The 'tone' of the page comes from when I put it first up, just as a basic outline. I just didn't really get back to it yet. I've editted it though, reflecting updates that have since happened and referenced it more.
 * Removing the links would make it sort of useless. It is set up as a help for editors, yet if they don't know exactly which source it is, or where to find it, wouldn't really help anyone.
 * Thanks for 'inspiring' me to improve the article though.
 * I hope to have informed you well enough. If not, feel free to leave me a message.
 * JackSparrow Ninja 07:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

 * Jedi6, in regards to this page, I believe the user does not have an understanding of what the term "reliable" means. Every single major, reliable news outlet has had a bad story or inaccurate info posted before.  This user is claiming that an April Fools Joke and a story my site retracted, and explained why, are the reasons why my site is unreliable, even though taking a closer look would show that we have: original news reports that can be independently verified, a high financial stake in the site as we pay for serious server costs and other expenses which are a burden to keep doing if we're reporting "unreliable" news, we always cite sources if we get the news from a second or third party, and we provide or own original coverage through reviews and media conent.  So because two stories out of our thousands weren't "correct", we're not unreliable.  On the same page, this user lists Land of the Legend, a site  I believe the user JackSparrow_Ninja is a part of, or even the owner (Martjin Mujer himself) and is trying to use it as a form of taunt and self promotion.  Their site is strictly dedicated to the niche market of The Legend of Zelda series, which does not have enough "news" about it to warrant a "news site", but a "fan site".  Their site's content is strictly hearsay news reporting, and they don't even have that much "Zelda" content anymore as most of it seems down.  They try to push (C) material as "original content" of their own, and they claim they are a major media outlet with access to resources, yet they couldn't even deliver on their claim of "superior" coverage of the Wii Launch in Europe, especially anything on Twilight Princess, nor did they even provide coverage of GDC in Germany, which they said they would definitely have.  Their content and nature makes them an obvious fan site, and all they do is take content from other sites and try to push it as their own.  They're reliable...for a fan site, but their original reports are always way too generic and UNVERIFIABLE - they never should be used for a source on Wikipedia and even in some guy's own personal "source reliablity" article they shouldn't be listed as "credible" or "reliable".  The entire page is out to assert Land of the Legend's "reliablity", how it is more reliable than IGN for crying out loud, and it's more of their propaganda campaign.  I really suggest the page be remove and locked - as I was explained, Wikipedia is not a message board and the place for personal opinions in articles, but rather facts and truths.  I seriously take the user's recent actions, as well as his history of actions against my comments and edits, as harassment and I really would like him to be removed.  I am not the only user his has complaints, he routinely ad spams Legend of Zelda articles, which users have routinely told him to stop.  This needs to end, give him a final warning of something or remove him because he contributes nothing but trouble in the majority of his edits, and he is simply around to promote a fan site on Wikipedia. --TSA 02:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

 * JackSparrow_Ninja recently added a citation to the Tingle RPG entry with a link to Land of the Legend claiming the game is not coming out on the said date a print magazine claimed. While the claim may not be true, Land of the Legend provides NO SOURCE for their info and they are NOT RELIABLE.  This user account really needs to be removed, he will not stop ad-spamming Land of the Legend.  Also, if you want an example of the site's reliability see this .  They hijacked my account (The Silent Assassin) and are posting crap with it.  That's the mark of a professional site?  I also seriously demand that JackSparrow_Ninja's entry on his reliability page be deleted or have his entry on my site removed because it is unfounded and just libel. --TSA 02:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

fair use in portals
there is currently a proposed amendment to include fair use images in the portal space at Fair use/Amendment/Fair use images in portals2. I have decided to contact you because you expressed interest in this topic in the past. Please know that I am contacting all editors who partipated in discussions regarding this at WT:FUC. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 22:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

List of Wii games
Hey there Jedi6,

I've noted that you've contributed before to the List of Wii games. Just wanted to let you know that the list is getting ready for Featured status and is currently undergoing a Peer Review. If you can take a moment to look over the article and add your suggestions/comments for improvement here, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks! -Digiwrld1 21:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Feel the Magic Screenshot.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Feel the Magic Screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tieinterceptor.jpg
Hello Jedi6, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Tieinterceptor.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Jedi6. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Patterns of Force (novel)
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: unused redirect --32X 21:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC) --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

your missing the drive inn theatre in Mitchell SD it has been in business for years. The list is incomplete.........Thanks
Please up date your list of drive inn to include the starlight drive inn in mithchell

Non-free use disputed for Image:Electroplankton.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Electroplankton.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Request your comments
I created a proposal. Please comment here.

Note: Please analyze each proposal on their own validity - do not reject a proposal just because you rejected a different one. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Super Princess Peach boxart.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Super Princess Peach boxart.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Malkinann 12:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign
A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 22:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

TIE Defender
I used to edit TIE Defender a long time ago, and I planned to do so again until I realized that it was merged into TIE fighter. I feel that the Defender, TIE Avenger (which formerly had a substantial article in its own right back in 2006, although it might have been deleted), TIE Bomber, TIE Interceptor, etc. should get seperate articles, as being merged into TIE fighter does not do justice to their distinctiveness and roles. Did a majority of editors back such a merge?

Also, I have a problem with a guy that keeps deleting sourced material on Michael Ignatieff, making excuses about RS and BLP, even though the "blog" in question references reputable news sources. GoldDragon 18:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

GoldDragon 18:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ForceHereticII.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ForceHereticII.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ForceHereticIII.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ForceHereticIII.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Adventures of Lando Calrissian.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adventures of Lando Calrissian.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jedi Eclipse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jedi Eclipse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Galaxy of Fear.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Galaxy of Fear.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Swarm War(DN).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Swarm War(DN).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Recovery(novel).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Recovery(novel).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Hive.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Hive.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Mandalorian Armor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Mandalorian Armor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Odama.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Odama.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:True Swing Golf.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:True Swing Golf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Traitor (Novel).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Traitor (Novel).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ylesia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ylesia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloodlinesbook.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodlinesbook.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Edge of Victory II.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Edge of Victory II.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AForestApart.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AForestApart.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

=D
User:Jedi6/Revenge of Jedi6 Wow. Just wow. I remember that! ...so long ago.  the_ed 17  15:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Also look at this, isn't it nice. Texcarson (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

 * ...what the heck...? So worried about socks then...when he was a sock himself? :) Cheers Jedi6, and have fun with whatever you are up to in RL... — Ed 17   for President  Vote for Ed  20:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rub Rabbits (US).jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Rub Rabbits (US).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Young Jedi Knights.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Young Jedi Knights.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Han Solo Adventures

The article The Han Solo Adventures has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BK no significant 3rd party coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 21:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rogue Planet (novel)

The article Rogue Planet (novel) has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BK no significant 3rd party coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 21:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Star Wars: Darth Bane: Path of Destruction

The article Star Wars: Darth Bane: Path of Destruction has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BK no significant 3rd party coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 21:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Rogue Planet (novel)
I have nominated Rogue Planet (novel), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Rogue Planet (novel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- RP459 </B> Talk/Contributions 03:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Administrators&oldid=526254016#Restoration_of_the_tools_.28proposal.29 recent change] to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox SW books
Template:Infobox SW books has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fool'sBargain.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fool'sBargain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Where do babies come from? listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Where do babies come from?. Since you had some involvement with the Where do babies come from? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Where do babies come from listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Where do babies come from. Since you had some involvement with the Where do babies come from redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Darth Maul: Shadow Hunter for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darth Maul: Shadow Hunter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darth Maul: Shadow Hunter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jedi Eclipse.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jedi Eclipse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Recovery(novel).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Recovery(novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ylesia.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ylesia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Swarm War(DN).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Swarm War(DN).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Balance Point.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Balance Point.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dark Tide Onslaught.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dark Tide Onslaught.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dark Tide Ruin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dark Tide Ruin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DarkJourney.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DarkJourney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Destiny'sWay.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Destiny&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Edge of Victory II.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Edge of Victory II.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EdgeofVictoryI.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:EdgeofVictoryI.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Final prophecy(novel).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Final prophecy(novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ForceHereticI.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ForceHereticI.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hero's Trial.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hero&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RebelDream.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RebelDream.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:StarbyStar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:StarbyStar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Jedi Order series
Template:New Jedi Order series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Orphaned non-free image File:Traitor (Star Wars novel).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Traitor (Star Wars novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Coruscant Nights for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coruscant Nights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Coruscant Nights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 15:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Hive book cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Hive book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Rogue Planet (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rogue Planet (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rogue Planet (novel)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. SL93 (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jedi6


text:
Vinica, North Macedonia

 Vinica (Виница ) is a town in North Macedonia, in the Eastern Statistical Region of the country. The town of Vinica is the seat of Vinica Municipality.

The town is located under the mountain of Plačkovica, in the southeastern part of the Kočani Valley. It covers the northern part of the river Bregalnica sinks. There are also several other rivers that flow through Vinica, like the Vinička, Gradečka and Osojnica. The town is known for its historic Roman fortress, Viničko Kale, situated on a hill overlooking the modern town.

Etymology
The name Vinica is derived from word vine, since the city was formerly noted for its vineyards. On terracotta icons found in Viničko Kale, the name of town is noted as Vinea or Vince.

Neolithic times
The territory of Vinica was inhabited in neolithic times. More recent evidence of habitation comes from findings on Viničko Kale from the 6th to the 12th century AD.

Byzantine Empire
The original settlement was a fort from the time of Byzantium, when it was a centre of wine production.

Ottoman Empire
The city was a nahiye and was governed by a Kaymakam of the Ottoman Empire between the 14th and 20th centuries.

Yugoslavia time
Before 1980, on the hill where the fortress was found, there were many vineyards, which were abandoned after excavations.

Demographics
As of 2002, the town had 10,863 inhabitants and the ethnic composition was the following:

 * Macedonians 9.706  (89.84%)
 * Roma 809  (7.49%)
 * Turks 216  (1.99%)
 * Aromanians 101  (0.93%)
 * Others 31

Culture
In Vinica, there are two primary schools Goce Delčev and Slavčo Stojmenski, one high school and city library Vančo Prke which was founded in 1946, there is also a cinema and a house of culture, Tošo Arsov, which is a centre of all cultural activities. The town has two folk music groups, Raspeani Viničani and Jana, and one folklore group Kitka.

There are several archeological sites in and around Vinica:

 * Vinica, medieval settlement.
 * Pazarište, settlement from Roman times.
 * Vinica Fortress, fortified settlement from late ancient times.
 * Gorica, settlement and early Christian basilica from late ancient times.
 * Ila, necropolis from the Iron Age.

Economy
One of the major activities in Vinica is agriculture. Farmers engage in the production of rice, which is very characteristic of the basin in which Vinica is located. The town also has industrial activities, among which is the best represented the textiles and wood furniture production industry. The major companies are: Makprogres, Viničanka, Vinka, Triko, Treska, Mebel-Vi. The city has many shops, bars, restaurants, two night clubs, and three major hotels, which are offering a broader range of services.

Sport and leisure
The leading sport in Vinica is soccer. The town formed its first football club in 1934 called Plačkovica, later renamed Sloga Vinica, now FK Sloga 1934 Vinica. There is also a basketball club Slavčo Stojmenski, a karate club Blatec and a badminton club Viničani.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Vinica, North Macedonia


text:
Talk:Kolonjë District

Article of Le Monde diplomatique shows Greeks in Kolonje

It shows concentration of Greeks not only in Gjirokaster and Sarande but also in Kolonje and Korce. It's a reliable source, I believe. Why neglect it? But the Greek name still needs to be there(whether there is a minority or not). Ioannina has the Albanian name, but no Albanian minority resides there now (only because the city is near the borders).

German Study shows no Greeks in Kolonje
Nationality map of east central and Southeast Europe 1989-1992 It shows the concentration of Greeks were in Gjirokaster and Sarande but gives no info on any Greeks in Korce.

It isn't German study but Albanian census 1989
I' m sorry this is not a study or a research, but just a depiction of every country's official census, it writes it clear -Albania census 1989- concerning Albania it is outdated and conducted by a totalitarrian regime. Alexikoua (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

There was at least in the past Greek presence in the area so I dont see why ont adding the name.--Alexikoua (talk) 22:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kolonjë District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724162916/http://www.instat.gov.al/graphics/doc/tabelat/Treguesit%20Sociale/Popullsia/POP%202009/t4%20.xls to http://www.instat.gov.al/graphics/doc/tabelat/Treguesit%20Sociale/Popullsia/POP%202009/t4%20.xls
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724163134/http://www.instat.gov.al/graphics/doc/tabelat/Treguesit%20Sociale/Popullsia/POP%202009/t2.xls to http://www.instat.gov.al/graphics/doc/tabelat/Treguesit%20Sociale/Popullsia/POP%202009/t2.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kolonjë District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224074834/http://explore-kolonja.com/eng/tourism/index.php to http://explore-kolonja.com/eng/tourism/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Kolonjë District


text: User talk:71.103.89.130

title: User talk:71.103.89.130


text:
Talk:Përmet District

German Study shows no Greeks in Permet
Nationality map of east central and Southeast Europe 1989-1992

It shows the concentration of Greeks were in Gjirokaster and Sarande but gives no info on any Greeks in Permet.

Greek Language is not Official in Albania
Because Greek language is not recognized as an official language in the Republic of Albania, I have removed the greek translation of the name of 'Permet'. --ArbërT • ? 10:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I notice a reversion of my previous edit, where I removed the Greek translation of the name of the city. There is a Greek Wikipedia where every Greek can party. In the English Wikipedia, however, the English name must be used and, in absence, the Albanian name is to be used. Why do you have to translate the Albanian name into Greek? The argument that "A Convention says so" is not acceptable by Wikipedia standards.--ArbërT • ? 08:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I didn;t translate the name of Tirana or Kruja.Whereever living Greeks or Albanians or Serbes or Japanese have the rigth to call the place in their languaage.You have to underastand this and not talking with your other Albanian friends about deleting the Greek names from the villages and towns of greek minority on Albania.Kuptove apo jo??Knonis (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, they have the right to use any language, but an encyclopedia article must contain only the truth, based on facts. If you visit Permet, you will see no road signs in other languages but in Albanian. I believe that Wikipedia does not express the concerns of minorities.--ArbërT • ? 08:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I answer to you in the talk page for Albanian geograpfical names.Knonis (talk) 08:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Question
Has anybody observed that this article looks more like a tour operator's leaflet or is it just me?--Giorgos Tzimas (talk) 09:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well... not anymore, apparently--Giorgos Tzimas (talk) 13:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Përmet District


text:
Vincent Sarich

Vincent Matthew Sarich (December 13, 1934 – October 27, 2012) was an American anthropologist and biochemist. He was Professor Emeritus in anthropology at University of California, Berkeley.

Sarich and his PhD advisor, Allan Wilson, used molecular data to estimate that humans and chimpanzees have a common ancestor just four to five million years ago. Their paper on their finding was published in 1967. At the time, scientists considered the common ancestor to live ten to 30 million years ago, and their revised estimate has become well accepted. Sarich generated controversy with his support for analyzing human behavior and populations in evolutionary terms.

Early life and education
Born in Chicago, he received a bachelor of science in chemistry from Illinois Institute of Technology and his masters and doctorate in anthropology from University of California, Berkeley, where he was supervised by Sherwood Washburn. He was a member of the Department of Anthropology at Stanford from 1967 to 1981, and taught at UC Berkeley from 1966 through 1994.

As a doctoral student, and along with his PhD supervisor Allan Wilson, Sarich measured the strength of immunological cross-reactions of blood serum albumin between pairs of creatures, including humans and African apes (chimpanzees and gorillas). The strength of the reaction could be expressed numerically as an Immunological Distance, which was in turn proportional to the number of amino acid differences between homologous proteins in different species. Sarich and Wilson showed that the pattern of differences between modern species could only be explained if the molecular change along different lineages had in fact accumulated approximately equally (i.e., where a type of 'molecular clock'). This method they called the relative rate test, and it showed that one could empirically test whether the molecular change was constant simply by looking at the pattern of differences between modern forms of the molecule. By constructing a calibration curve of the I.D. of species' pairs with best-attested divergence times in the fossil record, the data could be used as a molecular clock to estimate the times of divergence of pairs with poorer or unknown fossil records.

Career
In their 1967 paper Immunological time scale for hominid evolution in Science, Sarich and Wilson estimated the divergence time of humans and apes as four to five million years ago, at a time when standard interpretations of the fossil record gave this divergence as at least 10 to as much as 30 million years. Their logic first involved showing empirically that the albumins of several Old World Monkey (Cercopithecoidea) species was equally different from human albumin and chimpanzee albumin (within experimental error). This constituted a relative rate test of molecular change, and showed that both human and chimpanzee albumin lineages must have accumulated approximately equal amounts of change since their common ancestor (else one would be more different from the outgroup monkeys than the other), thereby providing direct empirical evidence of an approximate molecular clock for this molecule. This same pattern (i.e., equal distance between any two species and a more distantly related 'outgroup' species) held for all the empirical comparisons they made among primate species (within experimental error). Further work on additional molecules (for example, transferrin and hemoglobin) showed that these had also evolved in an approximate clocklike pattern in different Primate lineages. Phylogenetic trees based on these pattern of species differences were then constructed, though these could only indicate relative branch points, because the molecular differences - though having been shown by the relative rate test to have evolved approximately clocklike over millions of years - could not by themselves indicate how fast or slow the clock was (i.e., how many changes had occurred per unit of time). For this, Sarich and Wilson used the most well-established fossil evidence (In particular: no primates of modern aspect had been found prior to the K-T boundary, ~65 million years ago) to calibrate the tree's branch points. This work on a variety of molecules (and confirmed by modern DNA differences) consistently suggested a recent (~5 million year old) common ancestry with the African apes (chimpanzees and gorillas). Subsequent fossil discoveries, notably Lucy, and reinterpretation of older fossil materials, notably Ramapithecus, showed these younger estimates to be likely correct and have validated the pattern implied initially by Sarich and Wilson's albumin data. Empirical demonstrations that the molecular clock principle held among large groups of organisms (through application of the relative rate test) revolutionized the study of molecular evolution.

Sarich's later work on race strengthened his reputation as a controversial figure. He applied his earlier work to racial differentiation, which he saw as subgroupings below the level of species. He also argued that the smaller the amount of time required to create a given number of morphological difference, the more selectively significant the differences would necessarily be.

Sarich was a proponent of sociobiology, evolutionary psychology, and that racial differences were real and represented evolved geographic populational differences (on average), which often caused him to be the subject of controversy by activists at Berkeley.

In 1994, Sarich was a signatory of a collective statement titled Mainstream Science on Intelligence, written by Linda Gottfredson and published in the Wall Street Journal. Sarich also wrote a defense of The Bell Curve.

After retirement from Berkeley, he occasionally lectured in anthropology at the University of Auckland, New Zealand for a number of years. At the time of his death he was living in Seattle with his daughter, her partner, and grandson.

Criticism
Some of Sarich's teachings were criticized by some students and faculty, who argued they believed they were not based in science, and his critics said some of his statements were demeaning to women, nonwhites and homosexuals. Other students defended him against these charges, however, and defended his teaching.

In an interview with The New York Times, Sarich agreed with his critics, who stated that there was little or no scientific basis for his claims about homosexuality, or on the relationship that he was then teaching of brain size to intelligence. He told the Times there seems to be a correlation but "there is not a lot of evidence to support that theory because there isn't a lot of research done on the subject." With respect to his discussions on homosexuality, he told the Times "I have to admit that there isn't a lot of foundation behind that. In discussions it was clear that my students had more experience and were more heartfelt about the homosexual issues, and I had to agree with them."

title: Vincent Sarich


text:
Talk:Lita: It Just Feels Right

Tagged for merge to 'Amy Dumas' even though content is already covered there. Eddie.willers 22:30, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Lita: It Just Feels Right


text:
Talk:Fecula

The online dictionaries I've looked at for the definition of "amylaceous" (viz. American Heritage 4/e 2000, Collab. Intl. Dictionary of Eng. v0.48, WordNet 2.0) all give "starchy" as a synonym. As such, isn't the wording in this article redundant?

-- Drauh 22:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Fecula


text:
House of Buggin'

 House of Buggin'  was a Latino-themed sketch comedy television show which aired a mid-season replacement from January to April 1995, starring John Leguizamo and Luis Guzmán. It was aired on the FOX Network, but removed from broadcasting schedules before the completion of the first season. According to Leguizamo's autobiography, the show was a replacement for In Living Color, using the same format, and was itself replaced by Mad TV.

Broadcast History/Ratings
The series primarily aired on Sundays on Fox.

Cancellation
By the end of the ten-episode season, ratings declined by 50% from the premiere episode. Fox suggested replacing the entire cast for the second season. Leguizamo refused, and the show was cancelled.

title: House of Buggin'


text:
Talk:L-gulonolactone oxidase

Untitled
Deleted because this is just the abstract of the paper referenced by the link. No real information on topic here. MartinBiely 22:31, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Loss in bats
Previously, the article stated that all bats could not synesize vit-c due to GULO loss, citing , this paper mentioned it in passing. A newer paper states that most, but not all, bats have lost GULO. CS Miller (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry II
— Assignment last updated by Justme26 (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:L-gulonolactone oxidase


text: User talk:69.1.23.251

title: User talk:69.1.23.251


text:
John McAdam (businessman)

John McAdam is a technology executive.

McAdam holds a B.Sc. in computer science from the University of Glasgow, Scotland. From January 1995 until August 1999, he served as the president and chief operating officer of Sequent Computer Systems, a manufacturer of high-end open systems, which was sold to IBM in September 1999. McAdam then served as general manager of the web server sales business at IBM. He served as president, chief executive officer and a director of F5 Networks from July 2000 until June 30, 2015. McAdam was re-appointed to the position on December 14, 2015, following the resignation of Manuel Rivelo. In January 2017 F5 announced François Locoh-Donou would replace McAdam in April.

title: John McAdam (businessman)


text:
Forrest Church

Frank Forrester Church IV (September 23, 1948 – September 24, 2009) was a leading Unitarian Universalist minister, author, and theologian. He was Senior Minister of the Unitarian Church of All Souls in New York City, until late 2006 when he was appointed as Minister of Public Theology. He wrote about Christianity, Gnosticism, religious liberty in the US tradition, and his own father, a US Senator.

Biography
Church was born in Palo Alto, California, while his father, Frank Church, was a student at Stanford Law School. Following graduation in 1950, the family returned to Boise, Idaho. His father was elected to the United States Senate in 1956 and served four terms, until January 1981.

Church was a graduate of Stanford University and Harvard Divinity School. He received a Ph.D. in early church history from Harvard University in 1978.

In 1991, Church's affair with a congregant brought his ability to serve as minister into question, but most of his congregation supported him.

On February 4, 2008, Church sent a letter to the members of his congregation informing them that he had terminal cancer. He told them of his intention, which he successfully realized, to sum up his thoughts on the topics that had been pervasive in his work in a final book, entitled Love & Death.

Church died of esophageal cancer in New York City on September 24, 2009, a day after his 61st birthday. He is buried in Morris Hill Cemetery in Boise.

Writings
Church is best known as a leader of liberal religion. Between 1985 and his death, he wrote or edited more than 20 books. These include technical studies of Christian and Gnostic literature, as well as over a dozen books addressing a wider audience.

Books authored by Church include: Books edited by Church:
 * Father and Son: A Personal Biography of Senator Frank Church of Idaho
 * The trilogy A Humane Comedy: The Devil and Dr. Church, Entertaining Angels, and The Seven Deadly Virtues
 * Early Christian Prayer
 * Early Christian Hymns
 * The Essential Tillich
 * God and Other Famous Liberals: Recapturing Bible, Flag, and Family from the Far Right, Walker & Company, 1996 (ISBN 978-0802774835)
 * A Chosen Faith: An Introduction to Unitarian Universalism, with John A. Buehrens, Beacon Press, 1998 (ISBN 0807016160)
 * The American Creed: A Spiritual and Patriotic Primer, 2002 (ISBN 0-312-30344-0)
 * So Help Me God: The Founding Fathers and the First Great Battle Over Church and State, 2007 (ISBN 978-0151011858)
 * Freedom From Fear: Finding the Courage to Act, Love and Be (ISBN 0-312-32534-7)
 * Love & Death, Beacon Press, 2008 (ISBN 0807072931)
 * The Cathedral of the World: A Universalist Theology, Beacon Press, 2009 (ISBN 0807073237)
 * Restoring Faith: America's Religious Leaders Answer Terror with Hope, Walker & Company, 2001 (ISBN 978-0802776327)
 * The Separation of Church and State: Writings on a Fundamental Freedom by America's Founders, Beacon Press, 2004 (ISBN 9780807077221)

Television appearances
Church can be seen offering commentary in the History Channel documentaries Haunted History of Halloween and Christmas Unwrapped: The History of Christmas.

title: Forrest Church


text:
Plymouth Arrow

Plymouth Arrow was the nameplate used for multiple captive imports made by Mitsubishi Motors and sold by the Chrysler Corporation under the Plymouth marque:
 * The Mitsubishi Celeste, a compact car also sold as the Plymouth Arrow from 1976 to 1980
 * The Mitsubishi Forte, a compact pickup truck also sold as the Plymouth Arrow from 1979 to 1982

Plymouth Arrow

title: Plymouth Arrow