text:
Talk:Gateshead

Jewish Community
There is no mention of Gateshead's Jewish community, which is notable for various reasons (e.g. its large rabbinical college, occasional clashes with local population). Any ideas? JFW | T@lk  20:22, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

I'll put something in.

Bandalore 20.38 October  2005

Too much. I am going to try cutting this section down as it over-emphasises the Jewish constituent of this large town in a way that people from the area would find very strange. --82.45.210.111 10:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

My changes were almost immediately reverted without the person in question giving any reasons. I have therefore restored my changes. I fully accept there may be a difference of opinion on this, but in my view (a) the amount of detail in the section about the town's Jewish heritage gives a misleading picture of the town as a whole and (b) some of the information is hardly relevant anyway. If you disagree, please state your reasons here. Cheers. Paul Deeks. --82.45.210.111 19:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

 * I accept that there may be too much detail as it stands, but your first change deleted nearly all of the information, and your most recent change got rid of the Gateshead Jewry section altogether. If you want to condense the information, that is fair enough, but please don't remove large sections of text or links as it is considered vandalism. Thanks j o hnwalton  (talk) 08:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Rewind for a second mate. You agree there is "too much detail as it stands" and yet you oppose removing "large sections of text"? How can you reconcile those statements? Oh, wait a minute, you don't bother, you just throw out an accusation of vandalism. Cheers! I will try and amend again and instead of simply reverting it wholesale if you don't agree, can you either (i) try and change in a way you find reasonable or (ii) explain what your problem is here. I, like user 82.45.210.111 seems to be, am from the north east and agree this article as it is mispresents the town and is therefore in need of tidy up --213.121.207.34 12:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Right I have made significant amendments again, similar to those made by 82.45.210.111 but hopefully more satisfactory to John Walton - I must say these do involve removing the strange and perhaps rather POV section which attempts to demonstrate the significance of the Gateshead yeshiva in terms of internal discussions of Jewish orthodoxy within the Jewish community in Britain generally - this is precisely the type of detail which is unsuited to this entry for Gateshead - perhaps it could go in the separate entry on north-east Jewry which is linked to? --213.121.207.34 12:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Okay, firstly, apologies for not making myself clear in the above comment, perhaps I should have expanded further. I certainly wasn't trying to discourage bold editing, but in answer to your points, the reason I reverted the first of 82.45.210.111's edits was that I felt too much relevant information had been lost through section blanking, as well as the condensing of the first / second paragraphs. The reason I reverted the second edit was because it was a complete blanking of the Gateshead Jewry section, in conjunction with a similar blanking of the relevant section of the Newcastle upon Tyne article.
 * As far as the article goes, I agree that the yeshiva section probably isn't appropriate to the Gateshead page and might better be suited on a new article such as Judaism in North East England, but I'm not sure it would be any better suited in Judaism in Newcastle upon Tyne. I've reworked your edit to include some ONS stats for context, as well as re-introducing a couple of small pieces of information. As for the final paragraph which was removed:

 * I do think this has historical relevance and should be included in some form or another, though seen as there's a dispute over it, I haven't re-added it in any form just now.
 * I've also sectioned the article, which hopefully makes it clearer. j o hnwalton  (talk) 18:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Isn't it madness how you have a section about christianity (the religion of 82% of people in gateshead) which is one line long whereas judaism, the religion of less than 1%, gets six lines? I don't want to upset anyone but HOWAY we are losing perspective here. If you want my two pennoth, I think the Judaism in Newcastle section should become "Judaism on Tyneside" or "Judaism in Newcastle-Gatehead" with a link from both the Newcastle and Gateshead entries and ALL the superfluous detail deleted from the main articles. Gateshead is famous for its international stadium, its metrocentre, for the baltic, for the angel of the north. Someone has come along and added this big section, bigger than the detail on any of the aforementioned things, about judaism and when I tried to remove it - because its blatantly misleading - this other fella kicked one off. I appreciate it might be true and interesting stuff, but before any edits were made it made out the just about the most important thing the reader should know about Gateshead is this detail about the Jewish population. Whitewashing the history of the town. I have said my piece and will just go away now --82.45.210.9 20:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree entirely and have just made changes to the Sunderland article - a city with virtually not significant Jewish population (unlike Gateshead). Clearly this section needs to be made smaller too, but not by me, I haven't got an agenda or anything! To be fair Gateshead does have a very proud Jewish heritage that SHOULD be laid out in detail here. There is just too many words and someone should rewrite the paragraph to lay out the facts in a shorter form --SandyDancer 10:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

 * My family have been residents of Gateshead for over 50 years and 6 generations, and there has never been an 'occasional clash' with the Jewish population. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.8.190 (talk • contribs)

pronunciation
Is the name of the town pronounced Gates-head or Gate-shed, or something else?

 * Gates-head or Gates-heed. The pronunciation is slightly different in Geordie (what isn't! :) ) and hard to describe as I'm not a language scholar but Gy-ate-sud is close (said quite quickly, the dashes are to separate parts of the word not to signify pauses). IainP (talk) 13:27, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * If anyone is still interested, the pronunciation is Gāts'hĕd' (Gaates-head). But as IainP says, its different depending on what level of Geordie accent it's spoken in, Gāts'hēd' (Gaates-heed). j o hnwalton  (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Gateshead = Camelot?
I have never heard of this idea though I suposse every part of Great Britain claims part of the Arthurian legend but Gateshead?? Penrithguy 23:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

 * I did a very quick Google on this and could find nothing at all linking the two IainP (talk) 11:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Historians can't even agree on the evidence for a historical Arthur, so there is going to be little consensus amongst them as to the location of Camelot. Therefore I am going to remove the sentence regarding Camelot. It may be that this is a local legend, in which case an inclusion could be made by someone with the appropriate knowledge. --zider_red 22:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

residents
Does anyone have any idea of how accurate the report is that David Bowie, George Forman and Nelson Mandela lived in Gateshead? I dont really think this is correct
 * the George Foreman and Bowie references are accurate, but as far as I can tell Nelson Mandela has lived in South Africa all his life.

Any information on when/where/why they lived in such a place as Gateshead? (not that it isnt great)

I would have thought that these references are to brief visits rather than residence. The big Gateshead hotel overlooking the river (forgotten the name!) is popular with visitors to Newcastle. David Bowie has certainly performed in Newcastle, and Nelson Mandela is a freeman of that city, and was no doubt there for the ceremony. I don't know about George.

Bandalore 18.46 5 May   2006

The hotel your meaning is the Hilton right?

Demographics
Any chance of some info regarding population, density, age and ethnic make-up etc.? 86.0.203.120 02:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Saltwell Park
There is also no mention of Saltwell Park. Everyone sees Gateshead as dark and dingy place, need to brighten the place up. How about adding a Parks/Outdoor places section? Could add watergate park, chopwell wood, derwent country park.

Ingaz 00:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Good idea, feel free to add one. Bob talk 01:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this article supposed to be about the TOWN of Gateshead and NOT the Borough of Gateshead? They are two different things, which is why they have two different articles. Why is the population, that is listed in the info box, actually the population of the borough of Gateshead and not the town or central borough. This needs to be made clearer. I would be against including places such as Chopwell woods on this article, as that is in the Chopwell/High Spen area and should therefore be mentioned in their own articles. Try not to use this article on Gateshead what what can be said can be brought into a towns/villages/suburbs own article (Ryton, Rowlands Gill, Whickham etc.) and mentioned in the borough's article. From a proud resident of Crawcrook (that I will never consider part of "Gateshead").

I've added a little bit about Saltwell Park.

Bandalore 08:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Layout and images
Hello Gateshead editors,

Just a note that the article would not only benefit from the WP:UKCITIES standard, but also by having a "static image" within the infobox. There are many great photographs of many great Gateshead landmarks in the article, why not put one in the infobox? Examples of this are at Runcorn, Stalybridge, Stretford, Oldham, Wheathampstead, Porlock and many many more. Hope that helps, -- Jza84 · (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

A very minor comment about the image of "terraced houses". The row depicted is not actually terraced houses as such, it shows a row of what are known as "Tyneside Flats". You will note that between each set of windows are two doors. One leads into the bottom flat, the other opens up onto a staircase that goes to the upper flat. Terraced houses as such consist of self contained houses joined by common walls. Tyneside flats have more in common with apartment blocks or tenement blocks, albeit with only two stories. --MichaelGG (talk) 06:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Gateshead Indoor Market
I would like this article to have something regarding Gateshead Indoor Market. It was a staple of Gateshead Town Centre for 29 years, before it closed on the 11th of this month. I have no idea where in the article it would be suitable though.

Perhaps Gateshead Town Centre's decline could be mentioned as well. (Approximately 3/4's of the places retailers have closed in the last 2 years —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eugenespeed (talk • contribs) 00:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Gateshead TOWN
A comment was made a while back (further up the talk page), and I would like to bring it up again. This article is about the TOWN of Gateshead. NOT the borough, why does it list the population of Gateshead borough (190,000) and not the town of Gateshead. Also, places such as the Metro Centre are not in the town, they are in the borough. Surely the population figures should only be for the postcodes NE8-NE11? SJI - 23 January 2008

 * Agreed. Other places in England tackle this well. See Salford/City of Salford as an example. -- Jza84 · (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Doctor Johnson
The supposed quote from Dr Johnson is an old chestnut that always seems to find its way into anything written about Gateshead - what the Aussies call 'crying stinking fish'. There's no evidence for it, so I've removed it. In any case Johnson wasn't travelling with Boswell; he met him in Edinburgh, after spending about a week in Newcastle.

Priestley was completely ignorant about Tyneside where he arrived in a rainy November, with a heavy cold. Bear this in mind.

See my site www.myersnorth.co.uk

I've also re-written the Tourism scrap, which was inaccurate.

Bandalore (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Gateshead?
Not that I wish to labour the point here, but, as has been pointed out for years (or so this page indicates), quite a bit of this article actually relates to parts of what is now the 'MB of Gateshead', rather than the town of 'Gateshead'. Just from the history section; Joseph Swan lived in Low Fell, which was part of Gateshead Fell, not Gateshead and the Norman battle referred to was also on Gateshead Fell (according to F Manders authoritative account), not Gateshead. Then in the geography section there are mentions of the QE Hopsital (Sheriff Hill, not really 'Gateshead'), Team Valley (not really Gateshead either), Windy Nook (and again) and the idea that Pelaw is sometimes considered part of Gateshead is unreferenced (for good reason: it is pretty much nonsense!).

This happens a lot in the article and I'm loath to start a flaming war by taking these things out, but they do really need to be addressed. If they can be supported, then great, but if not, some proper editing is required.Meetthefeebles (talk) 18:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Volunteers Required
Since my last message (above) this article still contains a raft of material relating not to the town of Gateshead at all but rather to the Metropolitan Borough of Gateshead. As no-one seems willing to correct this, and numerous other issues with what is an important NE England article, I am going to make considerable changes to the article once I go down to Gateshead Central Library to do a little research. Does anyone else want to volunteer to lend a hand- this is going to be a big old task and it would be better done collaboratively I think. Anyone interested please ping my talk page... Meetthefeebles (talk) 22:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Gateshead Boundaries- Request for Consensus
This article relates mostly to the Metropolitan Borough of Gateshead and I plan to start making major edits to it, but would like to see if I can get a consensus first on where the town of Gateshead starts and ends, because areas such as Felling, Deckham, Dunston etc are not and have never been part of the town of Gateshead.

I think the area in and around today's Gateshead Town Centre is about right and so propose to use the Gateshead Council ward of Bridges as the terms of reference for this article. Does anyone think this is a bad idea and, if so, I am very much open to others. Meetthefeebles (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Gateshead: Is now a city
Gateshead is now a city. It has been given the title of city despite its lack of a cathedral. Hence the description town of Gateshead is false!! 130.88.168.183 (talk) 15:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Where is your evidence that the Queen as granted it city status? Keith D (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

£250,000+ raised for mugging victim
Now, I know this will raise alarm in some quarters. However, I think the significant coverage of the following incident is worth including the incident in Wikipedia, because:
 * it has been widely reported throughout the UK (&, I don't doubt, worldwide) in all media, and
 * it's ultimately a 'feel good' story, & one of which Gateshead & UK residents & the public beyond the UK (with 1 or 2 possible exceptions) can be very proud, in view of the overwhelmingly generous public response, started in Gateshead & helped throughout the world.

So, who'd like to add a paragraph to the Gateshead article? I'm sure hundreds of WP editors would support the addition (with some dissenters). The facts:

Alan Bates is a 67-year-old disabled pensioner. He was thrown to the ground from his wheelchair, outside his house, then robbed of his pocket contents. The fall broke Alan's collar-bone. Alan was born with growth impediment (he weighs little, & is a mere 4' 6" tall) & sight-impairment.

Local beautician Katie Cutler, from Greenside, Gateshead, decided to set up the ‘Alan Barnes Fund’ page on the Go Fund Me website. She intended to raise £500 to show Alan that real people cared, but in fact raised more than £250,000, with donations from Gateshead & indeed around the world.

His name is Alan Barnes, not Bates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.27.16.131 (talk) 23:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

References: Trafford09 (talk) 21:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Mirror article, with photos
 * Google Search on related news reports
 * images for Alan Bates, the mugging victim

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Gateshead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110605064741/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/census2001/ks_urban_north_part_12.pdf to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/census2001/ks_urban_north_part_12.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080327073929/http://www.statistics.gov.uk:80/StatBase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8271&Pos=2&ColRank=1&Rank=224 to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8271&Pos=2&ColRank=1&Rank=224
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080609011624/http://www.yourtrinitysquare.co.uk:80/trinity-square-development.asp to http://www.yourtrinitysquare.co.uk/trinity-square-development.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Gateshead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080327073929/http://www.statistics.gov.uk:80/StatBase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8271&Pos=2&ColRank=1&Rank=224 to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8271&Pos=2&ColRank=1&Rank=224

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Gateshead County Borough Citation
A request for mediation... I keep reinserting as I have inserted a citation for a clear non ambiguous premise. Here is the edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gateshead&type=revision&diff=752241797&oldid=752185534 I have suggested to Samuel J Walker if he wants to get a third opinion, just say so on the Gateshead talk page rather than edit war. To be fair to Samuel J Walker he has also been respectful with regards to editing.
 * Primary issues
 * 1) I have inserted a citation from a well sourced probative document, the source comes from the Tyne & Wear historical archives at nationalarchives.gov.uk. Samuel J Walker, keeps reverting and removing the information.

Here is my (Barkleave09) case for keeping the edit: Without sounding disrespectful to anyone, it is fairly straight forward. Here is my simple straight forward case from myself for a third party reader: The citation that backs up the premise is very clear, probative, authoritive: Issue: Barkleave09 (talk) 07:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The premise: Part of the Gateshead County Borough until 1974 when it become part of the Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council,[1]
 * Title of the cited document: Gateshead County Borough
 * Quote from the document: In 1974, under the 1972 Local Government Act Gateshead County Borough merged with...
 * Quote from the document: to form Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council (see MD/GA).
 * The source of the citation: http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/rd/f55bf2c6-3190-4ba0-b5cd-100c8c6e856f
 * The probative authority of the citation: nationalarchives.gov.uk, Tyne & Wear Archives.
 * the citation in a template:
 * My argument: the premise is clear, the premise and citation match is factual and truthful, the context is clear, the citation comes from historical documents, official documents. I cannot see any reason to pull the edit down, or obscure. Though I am willing to let a third party settle this in order to stop any edit fighting and to be respectful.
 * My argument against Samuel J Walker edit revert is this: The information he reverts to is not cited. It is also ambiguous. But more importantly it has replaced a factually sourced edit that references a premise that is validated by a citation from a reliable historical document from a reliable archive, this imo makes his edit of the article regressive.

 * Additional issues
 * My argument: I don't dispute the accuracy of the edit Barkleave09 has made, my dispute is the location of it. The information I added is from here, and my main argument is consistency. From the pages I have seen of town/cities which have been moved out of counties, their lead usually reads "historically in Lancashire/Durham/Warwickshire" etc, with a section in the government section about any other status as county boroughs/corporates. As I explained, I did not remove the citation added, just moved it to a location I found more fitting in-line with other pages. The example I gave on Barkleave's talk page was Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, which includes "historically in County Durham" in its lead and later mentions its status as a county borough in the Government section. Samuel J Walker (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

 * Potential compromise: I've just had a brainwave. I looked at the Newcastle-upon-Tyne page which says "the city is historically part of Northumberland but became a county corporate in 1400". What I suggest is amending the lead of this page to include "Historically in County Durham (with reference), the town became part of the GMB in 1835..." It may be a bit long-winded for a lead, but it would save the potential toing and froing over this, since we both have correct information. Suggestions? Samuel J Walker (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Gateshead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.weatherbase.com/weather/weather.php3?s=591108&cityname=Gateshead-England
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120304104753/http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/freedom_of_information/106152docs.pdf to http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/freedom_of_information/106152docs.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303222838/http://isee.gateshead.gov.uk/detail.php?type=related&kv=3246&t=objects to http://isee.gateshead.gov.uk/detail.php?type=related&kv=3246&t=objects
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120913044517/http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/index.html to http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229192022/http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/routes/keelmans/keelman-intro.html to http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/routes/keelmans/keelman-intro.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229192027/http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/routes/utility/egc.html to http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/routes/utility/egc.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229192032/http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/routes/utility/wgcw.html to http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/routes/utility/wgcw.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229192040/http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/routes/utility/durham-road.html to http://www.cycle-routes.org/cycle-gateshead/routes/utility/durham-road.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130726005053/http://www.bpears.org.uk/Misc/Gateshead_Plaques/ to http://www.bpears.org.uk/Misc/Gateshead_Plaques/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141014073600/http://www.ncl.ac.uk/energy/background/ to http://www.ncl.ac.uk/energy/background/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100330052122/http://www.saltwellpark.co.uk/ to http://www.saltwellpark.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:33, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Historically
(moved from User talk:Inops, since it's discussion on the article's contents) --Inops (talk) 19:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello Inops, It is only a small matter but it was reached as a consensus earlier this year that historical should not be used in the lede. Anyway my argument then was: 1. that the term historical can be applied to any event in history that has any document to prove it occurred. And if there are more than one historical even then for the sake of neutrality the term should not be prefixed to an event or era over other historical documented events in a lede. Example: Xyz is historically Victorian...; Xyz is historically Edwardian... In a metaphorical article about the history of a place called Xyz, which era gets the billing prefix historical in a lede, the Victorian era? or the Edwardian era? 2. I lastly also argued Historic and Historical do not share meaning or uses; they are different.

Regarding the Gateshead article you could prefix the term historical to all the historical events in the lede. So which one gets it? Using the lede as you have put it, following the logic, but changing the words slightly: You could edit: Formerly in County Durham, in 1835, historically the town became part of Gateshead County Borough.[2] After the Local Government Act 1972, in 1974 Gateshead became part of the Metropolitan Borough of Gateshead and Tyne and Wear Metropolitan County.[2] The above edit, which prefixes historically to the Gateshead county Bourough era, gives undue billing to the Gateshead County Borough era over other eras, and so on. (Btw, the edit above would be as equally as valid as your edit.) It would certainly be ok to use the term historical in a lede if there was only one era and so on, but in here you have many historical eras.

As I have stated this is only a small matter and this is probably just semantics and we are probably not that far apart in meaning. But here is also what I'm referencing here to highlight that historical also does not mean historic. Authority Oxford Dictionary, Reference: Difference between Historic and Historical: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/historic-or-historical Btw I appreciate your input, and opinion... Barkleave09 (talk) 21:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * You would have a point if "historically" wasn't pipe linked to Historic counties of England. The issue is complex -- the government recognised in 2013 that the historic counties continue to exist in some fashion, so "formerly" is actually incorrect. For sake of brevity and not drawing these issues into every single location article, there's long been a site-wide consensus on the use of "Historically in" or "Historically part of..." as the best way to deal with this. --Inops (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

 * Hello Inops If you look at my previous edits, you can clearly see, in good faith, there was an agreed consensus...
 * The term historic and historically are different. To back this up again by reference I have provided a link: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/historic-or-historical This previous source from Oxforddictionaries.com shows historic and historical have different uses... With respect all that is required to prefix the term 'historical' to something is a historical document. I believe we have these options for an edit for the lede (Btw I believe there is a problem with the neutrality of the lede; However I believe you can prefix the term to whatever you want in the article, provided you have historical documents to reference...):
 * Lede option 1: Historically in County Durham, in 1835 historically the town became part of Gateshead County Borough.[2] After the Local Government Act 1972, historically 1974 Gateshead became part of the Metropolitan Borough of Gateshead and Tyne and Wear Metropolitan County.[2]
 * Plus of option 1: it is neutral no era gets a billing, or glitterballed, all eras get prefixed. Minuses: this makes a repeated redundant use of the prefix. I personally think this option is not good enough.
 * Lede option 2: Formerly in County Durham, in 1835 the town became part of Gateshead County Borough.[2] After the Local Government Act 1972, in 1974 Gateshead became part of the Metropolitan Borough of Gateshead and Tyne and Wear Metropolitan County.[2]
 * Plus of option 2: It is neutral, no era gets a prefix billing with the term. Minuses: It is not perfect but I believe this is the best option. You might disagree from your POV?
 * Lede option 3: a) historically in County Durham, in 1835 the town became part of Gateshead County Borough.[2] After the Local Government Act 1972, in 1974 Gateshead became part of the Metropolitan Borough of Gateshead and Tyne and Wear Metropolitan County.[2]; or b) Formerly in County Durham, in 1835 historically the town became part of Gateshead County Borough.[2] After the Local Government Act 1972, in 1974 Gateshead became part of the Metropolitan Borough of Gateshead and Tyne and Wear Metropolitan County.[2]; or c) ... and so on.
 * Plus of option 3 Imo there is none. Minuses of option 3: This could lead to potential edit wars over semantics.
 * I believe my edit is neutral and is semantically correct here. I also understand you believe you may be correct. Out of good faith I will edit one more time on the article. Out of good faith, in return, if you disagree explain below here, and I will get a third opinion and address them to this discussion here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Inops#Historically on this talk page. This will save both our time. I will accept the third opinion. My regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barkleave09 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * See Abingdon-on-Thames, Sunderland, Manchester, Liverpool, etc... they use the term "historically" to refer to a city's historic county. I don't accept your premise that there's anything wrong with this -- or anything about Gateshead specifically that means it can't be treated in the usual way. But, an alternative that's sometimes used is "Lying within the historic boundaries of *insert County*, the...", which clears up your problem with "historically". --Inops (talk) 19:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Also can you link the "consensus" you're talking about? I can't find it either here or in your edits. --Inops (talk) 19:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

3rd person
I and Inops would rather a 3rd person would end this in good faith. Earlier this year a concensus was agreed between about the term 'historically' and it was agreed it should not be used because it gave undue weight or billing to one era out of the three eras described in the Gateshead lead.

My edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gateshead&type=revision&diff=811898857&oldid=811777171 My outlined reasoning: My outlined reasoning is (and was earlier in the year when an earlier consensus was reached): I believe the term prefixed to one of the three eras presented in the lede amounts to a neutrality problem as it gives undue billing, undue weight, and puffery, to an era that gets billed the prefix. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Puffery I reason the term 'historical' used in the context of the Gateshead lede is clearly weaselling and puffery and clearly a misleading semantical misuse of the term historical. It is a clearly a term that can only be used if there was only 'one era' presented in the lead, Gateshead has 'three presented historical eras' in the lede; Therefore for the sake of the articles presented neutrallity, this also means no one era in the lede should be given undue weight and be prefixed with the term historically. I also believe prefixing every era with the term historical, for a sake of neutrality, is also flawed as it results in redundancy of the term historically. Therefore using the term historically for the sake of neutrality, on all three eras in the lede would result in redundancy with regards to the term historically. Therefore the only neutral use of the term is to not use it in the lede in order to respect neutrality. I also believe the editor 'Inops' is using the term historically interchangeably with the term historic as part of his reasoning, in order to bill an era. The terms historic and historically are different. Referencing English dictionaries.com the terms Historic and Historical have different uses. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/historic-or-historical One last thing, I also understand wikipedia is about consensus and I have no issues in what ever way you go. However I do believe if you go with Inops, the term historical should have a weasel template, as it uses the term historically incorrectly in a non neutral context and so on. Barkleave09 (talk) 00:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

 * Inops edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gateshead&type=revision&diff=811903447&oldid=811898857 Inops's outlined reasoning: See Abingdon-on-Thames, Sunderland, Manchester, Liverpool, etc... they use the term "historically" to refer to a city's historic county. I don't accept your premise that there's anything wrong with this -- or anything about Gateshead specifically that means it can't be treated in the usual way. But, an alternative that's sometimes used is "Lying within the historic boundaries of *insert County*, the...", which clears up your problem with "historically". --Inops (talk) 19:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Also can you link the "consensus" you're talking about? I can't find it either here or in your edits. --Inops (talk) 19:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barkleave09 (talk • contribs)
 * Where is the consensus that is claimed for this? Keith D (talk) 01:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello Keith D, a consensus was reached on the final few lines on a discussion on my talk page, link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Barkleave09#RE:_Gateshead_.28part_2.29 Barkleave09 (talk) 02:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the link. I do not think that you can claim general consensus for this as there was only one other editor involved in that discussion. Keith D (talk) 12:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * After a long discussion it was established via consensus, and agreed that for the sake of neutrality the term historical should not be used...Barkleave09 (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gateshead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140928153004/http://www.architecture.com/StirlingPrize/RIBAStirlingPrizeWinners/RIBAStirlingPrizeWinners.aspx to http://www.architecture.com/StirlingPrize/RIBAStirlingPrizeWinners/RIBAStirlingPrizeWinners.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

5G test site?
This town comes up as a test site for 5G technology, i.e. some people have trouble with that. This is an important topic to deny or confirm. 5G issues are a global matter and if there are tests and test results there, please let the world know. Greetings from Australia. 2001:8003:AC60:1400:F8D9:A473:A12E:6044 (talk) 06:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Education
No coverage of education providers in Gateshead? Helmardine (talk) 19:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Gateshead


text:
Category talk:English astronomers

This category
This page lists a tiny fraction of the English astronomers in the British astronomers category. I think this category (and Category:Scottish astronomers) should either be made complete or be deleted (which might be easier). Rnt20 20:23, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Category talk:English astronomers


text:
Hermodice carunculata

Hermodice carunculata, the bearded fireworm, is a type of marine bristleworm belonging to the Amphinomidae family, native to the tropical Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea.

Description

Bearded fireworms are usually 15 cm in average length, but can reach up to 30 cm.

At first glance, this fire worm looks like a centipede with its elongated and flattened appearance, multiple segments, white silks, and parapodia and gills located on the side of its body. Its colors are varied and range from greenish, to yellowish, to reddish, grayish through white with a pearly glow. The body consists of 60 to 150 identical segments separated from each other by a thin white line and protected by cuticles. Each segment has a pair of parapodia, a structure for locomotion, clusters of stinging white bristles, and red or orange gills all in bilateral position. The anterior part of the worm can be recognized by small growths, called caruncle, which have the same color of the gills on the first four segments. The mouth is ventral and is located on the second segment. The head is shown on the first segment and includes the eyes and other sensory organs.

Distribution and habitat
The bearded fireworm lives throughout the tropical coastal waters of the Atlantic Ocean. On the eastern side they are found from Algeria to Liberia, and on the western side from the southeast coast of the United States to Guyana, including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. They are also found in the Mediterranean Sea especially around the Italian coasts. A significant population structure exists between the Caribbean / Brazil population of H. carunculata, and those from the eastern Atlantic (Canary Islands) and eastern Mediterranean.

This fireworm is found in many marine living environments such as corals, rocks, mud, sand, posidonia, and on drifting wood as well as port infrastructure in shallow water from the surface to 40 m deep.

Biology
The bearded fireworm is a voracious predator that supplements its diet with plant material.

The bearded fireworm is a slow creature, and is not considered a threat to humans unless touched by careless swimmers. The bristles, when flared, can penetrate human skin, injecting a powerful neurotoxin and producing intense irritation and a painful burning sensation around the area of contact. The sting can also lead to nausea and dizziness. This sensation lasts up to a few hours, but a painful tingling can continue to be felt around the area of contact. In a case of accidental contact, application and removal of adhesive tape will help remove the spines; applying isopropanol/Rubbing Alcohol/Isopropyl Alcohol to the area may help alleviate the pain.

The transcriptome of the bearded fireworm was sequenced and annotated in 2015.

title: Hermodice carunculata


text:
BLR

BLR may refer to:

 * Base Lending Rate, in banking
 * Bad Lip Reading, a YouTube comedy channel
 * Bala Lake Railway, in North Wales
 * Belarus, whose ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 code is BLR
 * BLR, IATA code for Kempegowda International Airport in Bangalore, India
 * Former IATA code for HAL Airport, the previous primary airport of Bangalore
 * Beta-lactam Ring Records, an independent record label
 * The Biggest Little Railway in the World, a 2017 temporary model railway in the Scottish Highlands
 * Blacklands Railroad, based in Texas

 * blr, ISO 639-3 code for the Blang language of Burma and China
 * Breech-loading rifle
 * Browning BLR, a hunting rifle
 * Blacklight: Retribution, a first-person shooter game

title: BLR


text:
Work (film)

Work is a 1915 American silent film starring Charlie Chaplin (his eighth film for Essanay Films), and co-starring Edna Purviance, Marta Golden and Charles Inslee. It was filmed at the Majestic Studio in Los Angeles.

It is one of the first movies to appreciate the slapstick potential of a painting and decorating scenario.

Plot
Charlie is an assistant to Izzy A. Wake, a painter and wallpaper hanger. The two men are on their way to a job carrying their ladders and materials on a cart. The boss rides in the cart, leisurely sitting in front of all their paraphernalia, while Charlie is hitched to the cart like a mule. The boss also treats Charlie like a mule, beating him with a stick to get him to move faster.

When the boss opts to take a shortcut up a steep hill, the out-of-control cart descends and is nearly hit by an oncoming streetcar. A second attempt to scale the enormous hill is successful. A further delay is caused by Charlie falling down a manhole. At the destination house, Charlie carries all the material on the cart into the house in one move. They have been commissioned to hang wallpaper, but Charlie becomes distracted by the pretty maid. The boss has a misadventure and falls, his head ending up in a bucket of paste. Meanwhile, the short-tempered homeowner is contending with the threat of an exploding stove and an amorous French visitor who is making passes at his wife. Shots are fired—and the target turns out to be Charlie who has been enjoying the maid's company. An enraged Charlie gives the Frenchman, his boss, and the homeowner each a face full of paste. As the fight moves into the kitchen, the troublesome stove finally explodes. When the dust dies down, Charlie is nowhere to be seen. Slowly the oven door opens. Charlie looks out and retreats back into the stove.

Cast

 * Charlie Chaplin	...	Izzy A. Wake's Assistant
 * Billy Armstrong	...	The Husband (uncredited)
 * Marta Golden	...	The Wife (uncredited)
 * Charles Inslee	...	Izzy A. Wake - Paperhanger (uncredited)
 * Paddy McGuire	...	The Plasterbearer (uncredited)
 * Edna Purviance	...	Maid (uncredited)
 * Leo White	...	The Secret Lover (uncredited)

Review
A reviewer from Bioscope praised Work, noting, "The humor is designed to rise in a long crescendo of screams to a climax of roars. Positively, the thing is irresistible."

title: Work (film)


text:
Category talk:Scottish astronomers

This category
This page lists a tiny fraction of the Scottish astronomers in the British astronomers category. I think this category (and Category:English astronomers) should either be made complete or be deleted (which might be easier). Rnt20 20:23, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Scottish astronomers


text:
Talk:Abraam, Bishop of Faiyum

The Coptic Orthodox Synaxarium (Book of Saints) from which this article is adapted is in the public domain. The URL you are referring to is just one online version of the synaxarium. Identical copies exist at dozens of other sites, and also at: http://www2.orthodoxwiki.org/Abraam_Bishop_of_Fayoum

 * Can I assume that the version at http://www2.orthodoxwiki.org/Abraam_Bishop_of_Fayoum was written by the same author who posted it here? Alphax τεχ 01:33, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes!

I've attempted to make a start de-NPOVing this article. I'm aware that religious figures such as this particular Saint are beloved and stories about them are similarly well loved but wikipedia is not a hagiography and these stories are inappropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Please stick to the facts. That being said I don't think this article needs to be deleted we have a whole fleet of articles about Catholic Saints it just needs to be cleaned up and conformed to wikistandards.

--Anymouse —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.192.65.5 (talk) 18:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Abraam, Bishop of Faiyum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061006022933/http://www.copticchurch.org:80/Texts/Spirituals/Anbabram.pdf to http://www.copticchurch.org/Texts/Spirituals/Anbabram.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050819132516/http://www.copticchurch.org:80/English_spiritual_articles/AnbaAbraam.htm to http://www.copticchurch.org/English_spiritual_articles/AnbaAbraam.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050831145127/http://www.stabraammonastery.com:80/ to http://www.stabraammonastery.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Abraam, Bishop of Faiyum


text:
Patrick Ruthven, 1st Earl of Forth

Patrick Ruthven, 1st Earl of Forth and 1st Earl of Brentford (c. 1573 – 2 February 1651) was a Scottish nobleman, general, and diplomat.

Service to the Crown of Sweden
Patrick Ruthven was a descendant of Sir William Ruthven, 1st Lord Ruthven in a collateral line, and a grandson of Lord Innermeath. A lifelong professional soldier, Ruthven earned his reputation in the service of the King of Sweden, which he entered about 1609 and left 1637. He had been forced into exile to retain his family name which had been outlawed in Scotland by act of Parliament in 1600. As a negotiator he was very useful to Gustavus Adolphus because of his ability to "drink immeasurably and preserve his understanding to the last", and he also won fame on the field of battle. By 1621 Ruthven served as colonel for the Småland infantry regiment with which he campaigned in Livonia (Latvia). He took as his second in command Alexander Leslie, later promoted field marshal and one of Ruthven's opponents in the English Civil War. Ruthven was one of four Scottish colonels to be knighted by Gustav II Adolf of Sweden in 1627, the others being Alexander Leslie, David Drummond and John Hepburn.

His service in the Thirty Years' War was impressive. He became governor of Ulm in 1632 and was promoted to major-general the same year. The following year Ruthven campaigned along the Danube where he captured a number of Bavarian Horse outside Erbach which earned him his promotion to lieutenant general. He thereafter campaigned as second in command to the Swedish field marshal, Johan Banér, campaigning along the Rhine throughout 1634 and 1635. He was given a large share of the credit for the routing of the Saxon general, Wolfgang Baudissin at Dömitz, where some 2500 of the prisoners he took were pressed into the Swedish army. However, all was not well between Ruthven and Banér. The latter accused him of negligence at Halle in 1636. Ruthven thereafter returned to Scotland on a recruiting trip, but having made up his mind to quit Swedish service. Although Ruthven remained on the Swedish pay-roll for another year he travelled home via France where he claimed he was offered a field-marshal's baton by Louis XIII. Although he never served in this capacity, the rank appears on his English certificate of elevation to the nobility.

Service to the king of Great Britain
With the outbreak of the Bishops' Wars in Scotland in 1639, Ruthven offered his services to Charles I. He brought with him his two nephews, Major General John Ruthven and Colonel Frances Ruthven, both veterans of Swedish service. These joined a cohort of other Royalist Scots, including former colleague, Lieutenant General James King. During the 1639 campaign, he declined command of the Royalists in Scotland as he was not to be granted 'absolute authority' over them, instead being expected to defer to the nobility. His decision was wise and Edinburgh Castle soon easily fell to his former understudy, Alexander Leslie. After the Truce of Berwick was agreed, Ruthven was allowed to garrison the castle for the king and he defended it throughout 1640, becoming desperately ill after his provisions ran out. He and his English troops were allowed to leave the castle by negotiation. For his services he was raised to the Peerage of Scotland as Lord Ruthven of Ettrick in 1639 during the Bishops War and later created Earl of Forth in 1642.

When the English Civil War broke out that year, Ruthven joined Charles at Shrewsbury with some 29 other Scottish veteran officers and after Henrietta Maria's intervention with the king. Ruthven commanded the Royalist forces at the Battle of Edgehill after the nominated commander, Robert Bertie, Earl of Lindsey, stepped down in a dispute over whether to arrange the army following the Dutch or the Swedish style. In the end the Swedish brigade system was chosen and Ruthven assumed command. Following the battle, Ruthven was appointed general-in-chief of the Royalist army.

The Earl compelled the Earl of Essex to surrender Lostwithiel, and was wounded at both the first and second battles of Newbury. While some claim Ruthven's faculties had begun to decay, Ruthven had lost favour of his military inferior Prince Rupert, whose arrogance he detested. They fell out en route to face down the Army of the Solemn League and Covenant commanded by his friend Alexander Leslie. Believing Rupert inept, Ruthven returned to Oxford leaving Rupert in command. The prince lost the battle to Alexander Leslie and his English parliamentary allies on 2 July 1644. Ruthven thereafter served as Chamberlain to the Prince of Wales, having finally given up field service.

Ruthven still maintained correspondence with Axel Oxenstierna, the regent and chancellor of Sweden. He visited Sweden on a mission for Charles II to raise military support for the planned Montrosian expedition to Scotland. Using the social capital he had built up in Sweden over the years, Ruthven entered into negotiations with Queen Christina and managed to raise an officer cadre, money and guns for delivery to Royalists in Scotland and Ireland. These were squandered as Charles II withdrew his support for the Montrosians, effectively offering him up as a sacrificial lamb to the Covenanters in Scotland in return for their support. Dejected, Ruthven and King turned their back on the Royalist cause. Although it is often claimed that Ruthven died at Dundee on 2 February 1651 near the house of his relative, Colonel Patrick More, in fact he died at Buxtehude just outside Hamburg. He had been on a journey which took him from Kalmar to Copenhagen and Bremen with Sir William Swann and 2 companions. In Buxtehude, Swann and More took Ruthven's body to a nearby monastery after which it was returned to Scotland for burial. Apparently, he was entombed near Dundee at Monifieth Parish Church in the Durham of Grange family's burying-aisle. This family were noted Royalists who also helped the Marquis of Montrose on his way to Sweden. The church was razed and rebuilt in 1812. It is unknown what became of Ruthven's grave, though a plaque commemorating him is found in the present day church.

Family
Ruthven was married to Jane Henderson and to Clara Berner. He had at least two sons: Alexander served as an officer in the Swedish army but he died before his father. Patrick Ruthven's daughter Jane corresponded with the English Parliament from Stockholm in 1652. She became involved in inheritance disputes with Patrick's third wife, Clara Berner, who did not die until 1679. Ruthven made his will on 9 May 1649 and in it left all his Swedish lands to his son Alexander's widow, Anna Erasma Klencke and Patrick's son by the same marriage (Jane Henderson), who was also called Patrick. These lands were Brevik (Jönköping Län). To his surviving wife, Clara Berner and their son Patrick, he donated Ljungbyholm in Kalmar Län (Sweden) and Sackendorf (Mecklenburg). His other goods in Scotland he left to Clara Berner. Clara and his daughter-in-law Anna Klence fought protracted disputes over the Småland lands, even until 1669, and these involved royal intervention. The executors to his will were General James King (taking care of the Swedish side) and Jakob Pringle of Huitbank (of the Scottish side).

Other Information
According to contemporary sources, Ruthven's behavior was consistent with that of a severe alcoholic, and at times he was called "Rothwein" (red wine). At the time of his resignation as commander in chief in 1644 he is said to have shown clear signs of chronic alcohol damage, and that may have been a factor contributing to his replacement by Prince Rupert of the Rhine.

title: Patrick Ruthven, 1st Earl of Forth


text:
Kingston Hill

Kingston Hill may refer to:
 * Kingston Hill, London, a district in southwest London, England
 * SS Kingston Hill, a British cargo ship built in 1940 and torpedoed and sunk in 1941
 * Kingston Hill (horse), a British Thoroughbred racehorse

title: Kingston Hill


text:
USS Worden (DD-352)

The third USS Worden (DD-352) was a Farragut-class destroyer in the United States Navy during World War II. She was named for John Lorimer Worden.

Worden was laid down on 29 December 1932 at the Puget Sound Navy Yard; launched on 27 October 1934; sponsored by Mrs. Katrina L. Halligan, the wife of Rear Admiral John Halligan, Jr., Commander, Aircraft, Battle Force; and commissioned on 15 January 1935.

Pre-World War II
After fitting out, Worden departed Puget Sound on 1 April 1935 for her shakedown cruise that took her first to San Diego, California, and thence along the coast of Lower California and Mexico to Puerto San José, Guatemala, and Puntarenas, Costa Rica. The new destroyer then transited the Panama Canal on 6 May and steamed north to Washington, D.C., where on 17 May she embarked Rear Admiral Joseph K. Taussig, Assistant Chief of Naval Operations, along with a congressional party, for a cruise down the Potomac River to Mount Vernon.

Worden subsequently returned to the Washington Navy Yard where her guns were disassembled for alterations. She then shifted south on 21 May to the Norfolk Navy Yard. In the ensuing weeks, the ship underwent voyage repairs at Norfolk. The yard work was broken once by trials and tests off Rockland, Maine, and completed in the early summer. She ultimately left the Norfolk Navy Yard on 1 July and spent the weekend of the 4th at New Bedford, Massachusetts, before setting her course for the west coast. After proceeding via Guantanamo Bay and the Panama Canal, she arrived back at the Puget Sound Navy Yard on 3 August.

After a post-shakedown refit at her builders' yard, Worden shifted south to San Diego, reaching that port on 19 September, and commenced four years of operations from there as a unit of Destroyer Squadrons, Scouting Force. She performed valuable duty as a training ship for the Fleet Sound School, San Diego, and conducted the usual tactics and type training evolutions in local waters and in maneuvers that took her from Seward, Alaska, to Callao, Peru. She also participated in regularly scheduled fleet problems and battle tactics with combined forces of the United States Fleet in the Caribbean Sea and in the Hawaiian Islands. One of the highlights of her operations during that time came in the autumn of 1937. In mid-September Worden—in company with USS Hull (DD-350) and escorting the aircraft carrier USS Ranger (CV-4)—voyaged to Callao, Peru, for a visit that coincided with the Inter-American Technical Aviation Conference at Lima. While Ranger proceeded independently homeward upon conclusion of her visit, the destroyers paused at Balboa, Panama Canal Zone, before returning to San Diego.

The coming of war in Europe on 1 September 1939 altered Worden's pattern of operations out of San Diego. Five days after hostilities began in Poland, the Navy commenced its Neutrality Patrol duties on 6 September. On 22 September, the Chief of Naval Operations directed the Commander in Chief of the United States Fleet to transfer, temporarily, to the Hawaiian area two heavy cruiser divisions, a destroyer flotilla flagship (a light cruiser), two destroyer squadrons, one destroyer tender, an aircraft carrier, and base force units necessary for servicing those ships; that dispatch marked the establishment of the Hawaiian Detachment—the forerunner of the ultimate basing of the Fleet at Pearl Harbor.

Worden was attached to this new force, commanded by Vice Admiral Adolphus Andrews, whose flag flew in the heavy cruiser USS Indianapolis (CA-35). On 5 October 1939, she sailed for Pearl Harbor.

Worden worked primarily in the Hawaiian Islands over the next two years, interspersing her time at Pearl Harbor and its environs with regular periods of upkeep on the West Coast. Upon the conclusion of Fleet Problem XXI in the spring of 1940, the entire fleet was based in Hawaiian waters.

Pearl Harbor
On the morning of 7 December 1941, during the attack on Pearl Harbor, Worden lay in a nest alongside destroyer tender USS Dobbin (AD-3), receiving upkeep. She suffered no damage in the Japanese attack, but one of her gunners, Quartermaster 3d Class Raymond H. Brubaker, shot down a bomber with a .50-caliber Browning machine gun. Within two hours of the commencement of the attack, Worden had gotten underway and was proceeding to the open sea.

Although, in the operational plans for the attack, Japanese submarines were supposed to attack American ships as they emerged from Pearl Harbor, their attempts to carry out the mission failed. The danger of enemy submarines, however, did exist; and purported submarine sightings proliferated.

Worden picked up a submarine contact at 1240—well over three hours after the attack by the enemy aircraft had been completed—and dropped seven depth charges. That afternoon, the destroyer joined a task force built around the light cruiser USS Detroit (CL-8), the flagship of Rear Admiral Milo Draemel. Searching the seas southwest of Oahu, Worden rendezvoused with the fleet oiler USS Neosho (AO-23) and escorted her to a fueling rendezvous with Admiral Aubrey W. Fitch's Task Force (TF) 11 built around the aircraft carrier USS Lexington (CV-2).

While Neosho fueled the ships of TF 11 on the morning of 11 December, Worden assumed a screening station on Lexington's bow and the next night escorted Neosho away from danger when USS Dewey (DD-349) discovered what looked like a surfaced enemy submarine and went on the offensive. After having seen Neosho to a safe haven at Pearl Harbor, Worden returned to the open sea on 14 December as part of the covering force moving toward Wake Island. The Wake Island Relief Expedition was recalled on the morning of 22 December; and the island fell two days before Christmas.

1942
Worden returned to patrol and escort operations in the Hawaiian Islands; and, while thus engaged with the Lexington task force, twice dropped depth charges on suspected enemy submarine contacts off Oahu on 16 January 1942 and again six days later.

Detached from TF 11 on the last day of the month, Worden left Pearl Harbor on 5 February to escort the seaplane tender USS Curtiss (AV-4) and the fleet oiler USS Platte (AO-24), via Samoa and the Fiji Islands, arriving at Nouméa, New Caledonia, on 21 February. Three days later, when the merchantman SS Snark struck a mine in Bulari Passage (a break in the reefs near Nouméa), Worden went to her assistance, passing a tow line to the sinking ship and pulling her clear of the channel entrance. Worden's medical department tended six injured men, and the ship brought the crew safely to port.

Departing Nouméa on 7 March, Worden—in company with Curtiss—set course for Pearl Harbor and reached that port on the 19th. That day, the destroyer entered the navy yard there and, after her repairs had been finished, joined TF 11 on 14 April.

Worden headed out to sea on the 15th, in company with the Lexington task force, bound for a rendezvous area southwest of the New Hebrides Islands, where, on 1 May, they joined Rear Admiral Frank Jack Fletcher's TF 17, built around the carrier USS Yorktown (CV-5). On the 2nd, after the two carrier task forces had fueled, Worden was detached to escort the fleet oiler USS Tippecanoe (AO-21) to Nouméa. In her absence, the American carriers engaged in the Battle of the Coral Sea.

On 12 May—two days after she reached Nouméa—Worden was joined in that port by the cruisers and destroyers of the former Lexington task force. "Lady Lex" had succumbed to massive internal explosions and fires started during the battle. As part of that group, Worden put to sea on the 13th and, the following day, rendezvoused with TF 16 off Efate in the New Hebrides. Formed around the carriers USS Enterprise (CV-6) and USS Hornet (CV-8), this force was commanded by Vice Admiral William F. Halsey.

Battle of Midway
TF 16 reached Pearl Harbor on the 26th. Worden sailed on 28 May with TF 16—the force now under the command of Rear Admiral Raymond A. Spruance, who had replaced Halsey. Later, TF 17—formed around the hurriedly repaired and replenished Yorktown—rendezvoused with Spruance's force to the north of Midway Island.

Worden screened Enterprise and Hornet throughout the Battle of Midway from 4 to 6 June 1942. Worden returned to Pearl Harbor on the 13th and was soon assigned to the screen of a revitalized TF 11, built around the newly repaired USS Saratoga (CV-3). The destroyer escorted Saratoga as she sailed to Midway and flew off reinforcement groups of Army and Marine Corps aircraft before returning to the Hawaiian Islands for training.

On 9 July, Worden headed for the South Pacific with Saratoga's task force but was temporarily detached on the 21st to escort Platte to Nouméa, reaching that port four days later. While Platte took on her vital cargo to replenish ships of the carrier task force, Worden patrolled the harbor entrance. On the 28th, Worden and Platte got underway to rejoin Saratoga.

En route on the first night out, Worden sighted signal lights in the darkness. She soon took on board 36 survivors of the sunken Army transport Tjinegara which had been torpedoed on the 25th by the JSUB I-169 and sunk about 75 miles southwest of Nouméa.

Worden returned to the Saratoga group to the south of the Fiji Islands on the following day, when the carrier forces joined marine-laden troop transports that had sailed from Wellington, New Zealand, for the invasion of the Solomon Islands. Her stay with the carrier was brief, for the destroyer was soon detached to escort the fleet oiler USS Cimarron (AO-22) to Nouméa, where she landed the Tjinegara's survivors on 1 August.

Worden caught up with TF 16 on 3 August and, shortly before daybreak on the 7th, was screening Saratoga as the carrier launched air strikes against Japanese positions on Guadalcanal and Tulagi preparatory to the landings.

Battle of the Eastern Solomons
For the next two weeks, Worden operated with Saratoga south of the Solomons protecting supply and communication lines leading to Guadalcanal. During the Battle of the Eastern Solomons, Worden screened the flattop as she launched air strikes in company with Enterprise to sink the JAPANESE AIRCRAFT CARRIER Ryūjō and damage the seaplane tender JAPANESE AIRCRAFT CARRIER Chitose. Less than a week later, however, JSUB I-26 torpedoed Saratoga and put her out of action, necessitating a trip to the mainland United States for repairs.

Worden screened Saratoga's retirement via Tongatapu in the Tonga Islands to Pearl Harbor, arriving there on 23 September. Five days later, she sailed with two other destroyers—screening the battleships USS Idaho (BB-42) and USS Pennsylvania (BB-38)—for the west coast of the United States. She reached San Francisco, California on 4 October but departed again a week later with USS Gansevoort (DD-608) to accompany Idaho to Puget Sound where they arrived on the 14th. Worden soon returned south to San Francisco and later joined Dewey in screening the battleship USS Nevada (BB-36) during her post-repair trials in the San Pedro-San Diego area.

Grounding
On 27 December 1942, Worden sailed from San Francisco to support the occupation of Amchitka Island in the Aleutian Islands. She reached Dutch Harbor, Alaska, on New Year's Day 1943 and, on 12 January, was guarding the transport USS Arthur Middleton (AP-55) as that transport put the preliminary Army security unit on the shores of Constantine Harbor, Amchitka Island. The destroyer maneuvered into the rock-edged harbor and stayed there until the last men had landed and then turned to the business of clearing the harbor.

A strong current, however, swept Worden onto a pinnacle that tore into her hull beneath her engine room and caused a complete loss of power. Dewey passed a towline to her stricken sister and attempted to tow her free, but the cable parted, and the heavy seas began moving Worden—totally without power—inexorably toward the rocky shore. The destroyer then broached and began breaking up in the surf; CDR William G. Pogue, the stricken destroyer's commanding officer, ordered abandon ship; and, as he was directing that effort, was swept overboard into the wintry seas by a heavy wave that broke over the ship.

Pogue was among the fortunate ones, however, because he was hauled, unconscious, out of the sea. Fourteen of his crew drowned. Worden, herself, was a total loss. Her name was struck from the Navy list on 22 December 1944.

Worden earned four battle stars for her World War II service.

title: USS Worden (DD-352)


text:
File:7nationarmy.jpg

Summary
Single album cover to Seven Nation Army.

title: File:7nationarmy.jpg


text:
Charles Frederick Lindauer

Charles Frederick Lindauer I (c. 1836–1921) was a New York businessman and criminal. He was involved in the New York City corruption scandal of 1894 as the policy dealer, cigar dealer and tobacconist in Manhattan and Hoboken, at Lindauer and Company. He was a Free and Accepted Mason.

Early life
Lindauer was born in 1836 in Philadelphia to Oscar Arthur Moritz Lindauer (1815–1866) and Sophia Weber (1815–1891). He was the eldest of four children. His siblings were John Jacob (1841–1888), Louis Julius (1842–1915), and Eloise (1852–1944).

Lindauer received his first Masonic degree on March 23, 1861 and his second on April 3, 1861, and completed his membership on January 27, 1864. Tom Savini of the Livingston Masonic Library noted that Lindauer may have served in the American Civil War, since "it is not usual to have a three-year gap between the 2nd and 3rd degrees."

Career
Lindauer worked as a cigar dealer by 1880. He was involved in the 1894–1895 corruption scandal in New York City and his name came up in the Lexow Committee hearings run by State Senator Clarence Lexow. Testimony involving Charles was: "Lindauer has a new place [in New York City]; he is a small fry backer."

Personal life
In February 1857, Charles married Anna Augusta Kershaw (1841–1931), most likely in New York City. They had six children: Eloise (1861–1935), William (1866-c.1870), Adeline (1862-before 1921), Anna Lillian (1872–1956), Harry Chauncey (1877–1923), and LeBaron "Lee" Hart (1879–1945). He died in 1921 from myocarditis and he was buried in Greenwood Union Cemetery.

title: Charles Frederick Lindauer


text:
Talk:David Helfgott

"Rise and Shine" subheading
Har... Har. Sp0ng 10:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, I couldn't think of a better way to describe that he'd had a movie about him and he rose to fame through it. It's short and sweet and just happens to be a common phrase. -- linca linca  12:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Of course :) I found it amusing though! Sp0ng 05:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Barely competent?
We currently have this:

 * Many of his recordings, especially that of Rachmaninoff's third piano concerto, have been criticized as lifeless and barely competent.

Shouldn't we at least cite such a scathing remark? --Doradus 20:27, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

 * Personally I think they were just being snarky. I mean he's not that great, but he's okay to listen to. I think they were somewhat justly annoyed though because truly great classical performers do not get that kind of media attention. Looking back the only thing Helfgott did to earn it was be mentally ill and have a movie made about it in his own lifetime. (Most movies about classical musicians seem to be done long after they die) I kind of figured some of the controversy concerning the movie would be here or at the Shine page though. As I recall some of his siblings indicated the movie was unfair to his father, invented allegations, and makes it seem like he was the main cause of his son's mental illness. (Which if Helfgott has schizo-affective disorder it's likely not mostly his Dad)--T. Anthony 23:36, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Dude, he has a mental illness doesn't he? Seems a bit rough to say such things about probably the worlds best piano player with his condition. 202.191.107.161 07:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

 * No, they weren't being snarky, just honest. Unfortunately, the criticism that his playing is "lifeless and barely competent" is true.  Anyone who compares a performance of his with that of a respected musician will hear the vast difference.  As for him being the world's best pianist with a mental illness, even that is dubious; e.g. many people believe Glenn Gould had Asperger syndrome.  But Gould is loved and respected for his musical genius, not for his illness.  The bit at the end that says he played "The Bee" is likely inaccurate, as this is a violin & piano piece by Schubert.  One would assume he played Rimsky-Korsakov's "Flight of the Bumblebee" as his did in the movie SHINE. 74.99.213.103 21:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

 * David Helfgott is not "the worlds best piano player with his condition." He's just the most famous one, and his fame is built on an extremely inaccurate movie. Rosier 08:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Its inaccuracies mostly relate to his pianistic abilities, but the atrocities he endured in his life are, according to sources, if anything, highly accurate, if played down for the purposes of being bearable. Films have been made about people who've been far less notable and who've not become famous save for the film made of them. Riding in Cars with Boys comes to mind. In other words, the films tells a tale that, though not wholeheartedly accurate, is an accurate depiction of the person and life, though perhaps not of the abilities of the person in question. -- linca linca  06:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You're probably referring to the movie Shine, so that discussion should happen there. But no, it's not just his pianistic ability that is grossly misrepresented; e.g. his dad wasn't a Holocaust survivor having arrived in Australia in 1935, his mental illness was not caused by his mistreatment but inherited schizo-affective disorder, etc. 24.235.124.106 01:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * To clarify a bit: although i'm sure there are inaccuracies, the two cited above are misrepresentations of what's actually in the film. The dad doesn't claim to be a Holocaust survivor; he obliquely mentions the extended family (grandparents, aunts), presumably either still in Europe at the time of the story, or recently deceased. And regardless of the nature/nurture debate, the film makes no direct mention of how influential his upbringing was on his mental illness: no doctors or mental health professionals even talk about it.  For better context, you might like to read the Shine_(film) page -- especially the two quoted letters from the film's writer/director and a researcher. Fhue (talk) 04:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

ABC Instrumental and Vocal Competition
The claim that he won the ABC Instrumental and Vocal Competition 6 times is from his own website and the geocities biography (both almost exactly the same and highly questionable). But it's not verifiable on the competition's own site (http://www.symphony.net.au/art_perf_01.html). They list all the winners going back to 1944. 74.99.213.103 00:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Cyril Smith reference
The page about David Helfgott references Cyril Smith as the teacher. A link is included to Cyril Smith but unfortunately the link is not to a music teacher, but to a politician. The link should have been to Cyril Smith (pianist) instead, I believe. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.10.68.249 (talk) 13:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

'Shine' section
it reads like this section of his bio had a bunch of sentences deleted or something. first it's about some other stuff, then a mention of "his onscreen performance", and then the movie is finally brought up "despite this" in the last sentence in reference to bringing him fame. the only actual discussion of the movie is mentioning that people disagree with it. --dan (talk) 03:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. It seems that all mention of the controversy surrounding the movie Shine and his subsequent tour have been removed. By all rights this should be the most substantial section in this article since the movie and tour are really the only things of note about him, especially the disparity between the adoring sold-out concert audiences and the unanimous critical drubbing. I rather doubt that anyone much cares that he likes cats and swimming - so does most everyone else. The deleted sections should be restored.99.233.78.251 (talk) 19:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Request for balance
why should only the negative criticism be expressed in the first paragraph under "Current musical career"? in the interest of balance, how about some praise for his recordings and performances, instead of just harsh criticism. i can understand how unfair it may seem to classical music fans that he got to be the subject of a popular movie, but wikipedia is not the place to grind an axe. POV discussions/compromise on other Talk pages have set enough precedent. Fhue (talk) 03:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If you can actually find a notable critic praising his recordings and performances, feel free to post one. Ginsengbomb (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Helfgott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050611084113/http://inkpot.com/classical/helfgott98p.html to http://inkpot.com/classical/helfgott98p.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:David Helfgott


text: File:Austin Powers International Man of Mystery theatrical poster.jpg


text:
Vedera

Vedera (formerly Veda) was an American Indie rock band from Kansas City, Missouri. The band was founded as Veda in 2003 by members Kristen May, Brian Little, Jason Douglas and Drew Little. They released The Weight of an Empty Room, their first full length LP in 2005. That year, they changed their name to Vedera after a similarly named band pursued litigation against them.

After signing to Epic Records in 2007, Vedera toured with The All-American Rejects and The Fray. Stages, their first studio album, was released in 2009 and peaked at No. 2 on the Billboard Heatseekers chart. Vedera disbanded in 2011.

History
The band members all grew up the Kansas City suburb of Blue Springs, Missouri. Kristen May was born into a musical family and her mother introduced her to the work of Joni Mitchell, Carole King, and Jim Croce. When May was 17, her father, a drummer, gave her a guitar and she began writing her own songs.

Meanwhile, Brian Little's father gave his son his first guitar at age 13 and Little played in bands throughout high school. May and Little knew each other in high school and began playing in a band together called, Red Authentic, after May returned home following an aborted stint at college in Nashville. "I didn't want to study music anymore, I just wanted to play it", she said.

In 2003, the band she had formed with her brothers needed a guitarist and they called on Little. However, with her brothers unable to tour, May and Little asked Little's younger brother Drew and high school friend Jason Douglas to join. The band was renamed "Veda".

Veda to Vedera
In the summer of 2004, Veda recorded its six-song EP, This Broken City, at Black Lodge with the support of Ed Rose. In 2005, the band released an LP entitled The Weight of an Empty Room.

In early December 2005, Veda's label, Second Nature Recordings, announced that the band had been forced to change its name from "Veda" to "Vedera" to avoid confusion with the band Vaeda, whose name was pronounced the same way.

Beginning in the summer of 2005, Vedera toured with Dredg, MewithoutYou, Communiqué, Thrice, Mae, and Underoath. In early January 2006, Vedera went on a 40 city tour opening for Mutemath, followed by an opening stint for Owen. In the Summer of 2006, Vedera joined a tour with Lucero and Murder By Death. After a month off, they headed back on the road for another tour with Mae and The New Amsterdams. Kristen May and Brian Little subsequently married.

In 2007, Vedera signed to Epic Records and were featured on the hit T.V. show, The Hills. They were also featured on iTunes and played their single "Satisfy" on Ellen. May also sang with the lead singer of The All American Rejects and Jason Mraz while they were touring with them. Vedera opened for Eisley on their Combinations tour in early 2008. In early 2009 Vedera opened for The Fray on their club tour and also performed in the spring with The All-American Rejects on the I Wanna Rock tour.

Stages
Recording of their album Stages began October 17, 2007. It was released online on October 6, 2009. The album charted well, reaching No. 2 on the Top Heatseekers chart and No. 146 on the Billboard 200 that year.

May said that Stages is about "our blood, sweat, and tears over the past five years as a band on the road." Vedera recorded Stages with Epic Records A&R executive Mike Flynn, who co-produced the Fray's double-platinum album How to Save a Life and Augustana's 2008 album Can't Love, Can't Hurt, and Producer/Engineer Warren Huart (The Fray, Augustana, Howie Day).

Breakup
In 2011, Vedera disbanded and announced that May and Brian would be working together on May's new solo album.

On October 22, 2012, it was announced that May had joined the band Flyleaf as lead vocalist, replacing vocalist Lacey Sturm.

Band members

 * Kristen May – vocals, guitar, piano
 * Brian Little – lead guitar
 * Jason Douglas – bass guitar
 * Drew Little – drums

Discography

 * 2004: This Broken City
 * 2005: The Weight of an Empty Room
 * 2009: Stages

title: Vedera


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger OS

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. Woohookitty 06:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Tiger OS
Nothing on Google, crappy article, and in the article it says the company says it won't release any info until 2006. Delete --Shanel 20:29, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - although a rubbish article isn't grounds for deletion, we don't have anything to go on on this new OS. Hell, Apple might not even survive that long. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Rob Church Talk 20:31, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Yeah, they've been saying that about Apple since 1985. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:28, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete with an additional SD tag added.   Paul Klenk 00:17, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. Borderline speedy. Would a serious company with any likelihood of producing a real OS use a name already [trademarked by Apple]? Dpbsmith (talk) 01:11, 29 August 2005 (UTC) Changing vote, see below
 * Redirect without merge into Mac OS X v10.4 ("Tiger"). Andrew pmk | Talk 03:15, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to mac tiger, as per andrew's suggestion __earth 04:48, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nonnotable -R. S. Shaw 05:39, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to OSX Tiger as suggested. Expand to full article when, or if, it gets actually released and becomes more notable. (Really funny pic though. Rip-off of Debian logo, "based on Linux and FreeDOS", har har...=) --Wwwwolf 16:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect without merge into Mac OS X v10.4 ("Tiger") as suggested by Andrew pmk. Reduces the chance of re-creation and "Tiger OS" is a fairly plausible title for an article about Mac OS X v 10.4. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC) Dpbsmith (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect without merge. -Sean Curtin 01:28, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per Andrew pmk. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 21:30, 2005 September 2 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Corpus callosotomy

After some thought, merged this into the already extant split-brain, taking the outside link and q.v. with it. However, it's not clear to me that this is necessarily the right way to go. If you have opinions on the subject let's discuss them: User_talk:Ikkyu2 - Ikkyu2 20:30, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corpus callosotomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050407105335/http://www.epilepsy.com/epilepsy/corpus_collostomy.html to http://www.epilepsy.com/epilepsy/corpus_collostomy.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Corpus callosotomy


text:
Terry Butler

Terry Butler is an American bassist who currently performs with the death metal bands Obituary and Inhuman Condition. He was also a member of Six Feet Under, Massacre and Death.

He is married with three children, and is brother-in-law of former Six Feet Under bandmate Greg Gall. On May 7, 2019, Butler's then 27-year-old daughter, Jona Wright, died in a single-vehicle car accident after her car came off the road and was overturned multiple times, also leaving Butler's two grandsons, ages 6 and 10 at the time, who were also in the vehicle, with minor injuries.

Death
Though Butler is also credited on Death's 1988 release Leprosy, he did not actually play on the album. The bass was instead performed by sole member Chuck Schuldiner, with Butler joining the band after the album was completed; though Schuldiner defended Butler's inclusion on the album's credits, stating "Terry contributed to the songwriting as well".
 * Spiritual Healing (1990)

Massacre

 * From Beyond (1991)
 * Inhuman Condition (1992)
 * Back from Beyond (2014)

Six Feet Under

 * Haunted (1995)
 * Alive and Dead (1996)
 * Warpath (1997)
 * Maximum Violence (1999)
 * Graveyard Classics (2000)
 * True Carnage (2001)
 * Bringer of Blood (2003)
 * Graveyard Classics 2 (2004)
 * 13 (2005)
 * Commandment (2007)
 * Death Rituals (2008)
 * Graveyard Classics 3 (2010)
 * Wake the Night! Live in Germany (2011)

Obituary

 * Inked in Blood (2014)
 * Ten Thousand Ways to Die (2016)
 * Obituary (2017)
 * Dying of Everything (2023)

Inhuman Condition

 * Rat God (2021)
 * Fearsick (2022)
 * Panic Prayer (2023)

title: Terry Butler


text:
Daddies

Daddies is a brand of ketchup and brown sauce in the United Kingdom.

History
The brown sauce product, known as "Daddies Sauce", was launched in 1904, and the ketchup was launched in 1930. The brand is owned by the H. J. Heinz Company; it was bought as part of the acquisition of HP Foods from previous owner Groupe Danone in 2005. Production of Daddies was moved to Poland.

In 1899, Edwin Samson Moore, the owner of the Midland Vinegar Company in Aston Cross, Birmingham went to see one of his customers who owed him a debt for vinegar. The man was Frederick Gibson Garton, a Nottingham grocer who had a small sauce factory at the rear of his premises. The 2013 book HP Sauce My Ancestors' Legacy tells the story of how Moore saw a sauce brewing in the back copper while visiting Garton. Garton explained it was his new sauce called Daddies Sauce. Moore cancelled the debt and paid Garton £150 (around £ in today's money) for the recipe of his sauces and chutneys which included Daddies Sauce and HP Sauce.

Marketplace competition
Heinz and Daddies are apparent competitors in the UK marketplace, with strong regional popularity in The Midlands, Wales, and The West Country. Daddies Ketchup trails the dominant market leader, the better-known Heinz Tomato Ketchup.. Similarly, Daddies Sauce and HP Sauce are apparent competitors in the brown sauce market.

title: Daddies


text: User:Mark has to sweep his own userpage - ha ha ha h a ha


text:
Hazi Aslanov

Hazi Aslanov (Həzi Əhəd oğlu Aslanov, Һəзи Əһəд оғлу Асланов; Ази Агадович (also Агад оглы, Ахадович, Ахад оглы) Асланов; commonly described as Azi Aslanov and A. A. Aslanov, 22 January 1910 – 25 January 1945) was an Azerbaijani major-general of the Soviet armoured troops during World War II. He was awarded the Hero of the Soviet Union title twice. The second Hero title was posthumously awarded in 1991, by Mikhail Gorbachev, at the constant recommendations by Heydar Aliyev.

Early life and prewar service
Listed in military records as an Azerbaijani, Hazi Aslanov was born on 22 January 1910, in Lankaran, Russian Empire (now Azerbaijan). The son of a brick factory worker, Aslanov received incomplete secondary education. After his father died in 1923, Aslanov took his place at the Lankaran Brick Factory, while completing Likbez educational courses.

Aslanov chose a military career and entered the Transcaucasian Military Preparatory School in Baku as a cadet in October 1924. After graduating from the school, he was transferred to the Borosoglebsk-Leningrad Cavalry School in August 1929 to receive command training. Upon his graduation in June 1931, Aslanov was posted to the Ukrainian Military District, where he began active service as a platoon commander in the 15th Cavalry Regiment of the 3rd Cavalry Division, stationed at Berdichev. Aslanov's cavalry service proved brief, and in August he was transferred to command a platoon of the 2nd Cavalry Corps's 12th Armored Car Battalion, beginning his career in the Red Army's emerging armored forces. Aslanov was transferred for the second time that year on 12 December to command a platoon in the Vehicle Repair Workshops at Kharkov.

Aslanov was transferred to the Separate Tank Company of the 2nd Caucasian Rifle Division in June 1933, where he commanded a platoon. He later rose to the posts of assistant company commander for equipment and company commander with the divisional Separate Tank Company. Promoted to senior lieutenant in 1936, he was accepted to the Communist Party in 1937.

In May 1938, Aslanov was appointed chief of the school of the Separate Tank Battalion of the division, which had been renamed the 60th Rifle Division. The tank battalion had been expanded from the pre-existing tank company. Promoted to captain in February 1939, his next assignment was as an assistant battalion commander for training and combat units with the 3rd Training Motor Transport Regiment at Kiev. In this role, he took part in the Soviet invasion of Poland with the forces advancing into western Ukraine and the breakthrough of the Mannerheim Line during the fighting on the Karelian Isthmus in the Winter War. In August 1940, he was transferred to command the Motor Transport Battalion of the 10th Motor Rifle Regiment of the Kiev Special Military District's newly formed 10th Tank Division. Aslanov was promoted to major in November 1940.

Eastern Front
After Germany invaded the Soviet Union, Aslanov commanded the regimental Motor Transport Battalion in the border battles and the Battle of Kiev. In August 1941, he replaced the injured commander of a tank battalion. In the fierce battles near Shostka, Bakhmach and Pyriatyn, his tank commanders fought to the last tank, while Aslanov personally led his battalion in the attack. In one of these battles, Aslanov received two bullet wounds in his right leg and a severe shrapnel wound to the head, but despite these injuries, he continued to fight. When the battalion lost all of its tanks, he was appointed assistant commander of the 10th Motor Rifle Regiment for equipment on 25 August. In this role, he fought in the region of Pyriatyn, Okhtyrka, Bohodukhiv and Kharkiv. With the surviving officers, Aslanov was placed in Southwestern Front reserve of command personnel in late 1941, and in January 1942 he was promoted to lieutenant colonel, placed at the disposal of the Commander of the Armored and Mechanized Forces in Moscow.

Aslanov was appointed deputy commander of the 55th Tank Brigade in February, but did not join the unit until May. Through this delay he avoided the destruction of the brigade in the Battle of the Kerch Peninsula. The 55th Tank Brigade was assigned to the 28th Tank Corps and took part in the Battle of Stalingrad. The brigade was reorganized as the 55th Separate Tank Regiment in October, reassigned to the 4th Mechanized Corps, and Aslanov, by then a lieutenant colonel, appointed its commander. Aslanov led the regiment, in the Soviet counteroffensive at Stalingrad, and was awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union on 22 December. For its performance, his regiment became the 41st Guards Tank Regiment on 26 December, while the corps became the 3rd Guards Mechanized Corps. The regiment was reorganized as the 35th Guards Tank Brigade on 20 April 1943, and Aslanov continued in command.

Aslanov led the brigade in the Rostov offensive, the Mius offensive, and the Battle of the Dnieper during 1943. For his performance, Aslanov, by then a colonel, was awarded the Order of Alexander Nevsky on 15 April and the Order of the Red Banner on 14 November. In December, he was sent to the Academic Courses for the Improvement of Officers at the Military Academy of the Armored and Mechanized Forces for further training.

After completing the courses, Aslanov returned to command the 35th Guards Tank Brigade in April 1944, having promoted to major general on 13 March. During the summer of 1944, Aslanov led the brigade in Operation Bagration, during which it forced a crossing of the Berezina on 28 June. With a battalion of submachine gunners and one armored vehicle, Aslanov linked up with fifty Belorussian partisans along a road and penetrated the German rear, taking the town of Pleshchenitsy, opening the road up for the advance of the main forces of the corps. Continuing the offensive, the brigade liberated Vileyka on 2 July and Smorgon two days later. For his performance in the operation, Aslanov was awarded a second Order of the Red Banner on 31 July and the Order of Suvorov, 2nd class, on 23 July.Subsequently, Aslanov led the brigade in the Šiauliai offensive, during which it took Šiauliai and forced a crossing of the Western Dvina. He continued to command the brigade in the Riga Offensive, the Memel Offensive, and the blockade of the Courland Pocket. For his performance Aslanov received a third Order of the Red Banner on 7 January 1945. During the Soviet offensive against the Courland Pocket that began on 23 January, Aslanov's brigade was sent into action on the Pauzeri and Ceļmaļi axis. Finding impassable swamps and minefields along its march route, the brigade conducted a flanking maneuver to the right and reached Katrīnes manor, where it encountered strong German resistance that stalled its advance. At 11:00 on 24 January, Aslanov arrived to the brigade command post at Dižkrogs, where he was soon seriously wounded in the head, neck and chest by a nearby shell explosion during an artillery strike on his command post. He was evacuated to Field Mobile Surgical Hospital No. 4396 at Diždāma, where he died on 25 January. Aslanov's brigade was pulled out of action that day, having lost fifty tanks in two days of fighting. On 27 January, Aslanov was posthumously awarded the Order of the Patriotic War, 1st degree, for his leadership of the brigade.

Awards and honors
Aslanov received his first star in 1943 for his performance at Stalingrad. The second was supposed to be given for the crossing of the Berezina river, under the recommendation of General of the Army Ivan Chernyakhovsky, but he received it posthumously, 46 years later, on 21 June 1991, after a special appeal by Azerbaijani intelligentsia to Mikhail Gorbachev. He received the following decorations:

Aslanov is commemorated by monuments in Nagorny Park in Baku, Lankaran, and Vileyka. A memorial tablet with his name is on Mamayev Kurgan and a stele in the settlement of Oktyabrsky, Volgograd Oblast. The new Hazi Aslanov station of the Baku Metro was named after him in 2002. A street in Volgograd is named for him, as well as a tanker and schools in Baku and Volgograd. A village in Agstafa region carries his name and his house museum functions in Lankaran.

title: Hazi Aslanov