text:
User talk:130.156.142.240

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- GraemeL (talk) 18:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

10 July 2007
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits. ~ Riana ⁂ 14:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to L. Ron Hubbard:
Your recent edit to L. Ron Hubbard (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 14:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Halo (megastructure), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Halo (megastructure) was changed by 130.156.142.240 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-11-13T17:35:13+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 17:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Olana North (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Plato
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Yannismarou (talk) 17:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Pool has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. NuclearWarfare  contact me My work 21:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to The Pool constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. NuclearWarfare  contact me My work 21:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Friedrich Nietzsche has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 17:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Financial crisis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Your recent edit to Crispus Attucks (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lonnie Johnson. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lonnie Johnson was changed by 130.156.142.240 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-04T15:35:59+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Lonnie Johnson (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or shut uplink spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Walt Disney, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GorillaWarfare talk 17:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page 1985 Mexico City earthquake has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 18:09, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Types of Restaurants. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ► Wireless Keyboard ◄. 23:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Renewable energy worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Igoldste (talk) 16:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! joe•roet•c 20:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Fujifilm has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Fossil fuel, you may be blocked from editing. Leonxlin (talk) 16:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fossil fuel, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Fei noh a  Talk, My master 16:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Robeson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thales, you may be blocked from editing. Alcmaeonid (talk) 20:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Barack Obama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 14:26, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to The Color of Water, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shirley Jackson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deor (talk) 01:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scientific Method concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scientific Method, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Scientific Method

Hello 130.156.142.240. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Scientific Method.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Potato Eaters, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Digimon, you may be blocked from editing. Crboyer (talk) 23:32, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cass Elliot, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 16:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 14:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Revenant (2015 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 14:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page John Jay Hoffman. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. —     Bill W.       (Talk)  (Contrib)   (User:Wtwilson3)   — 22:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khan Academy. On the basis of behavioral evidence, this is the same user as . DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Unfinished Tales have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Tentinator    16:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Flappychappy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Trenton, New Jersey— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flappychappy (talk) 20:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Samuel Little has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Samuel Little was changed by 130.156.142.240 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927329 on 2019-06-07T16:09:02+00:00

Recent edit to Marybeth Gasman
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Marybeth Gasman without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 20:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC) Revision as of 15:18, 1 March 2022

title: User talk:130.156.142.240


text:
User talk:Lkarayan

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --玉米^ō^麦兜 18:31, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Lkarayan


text:
User talk:Csm1701

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Alan Au 18:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image Tagging Image:Hascombepond.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hascombepond.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 21:54, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The Man with a Movie Camera
Hi

Came across your page from the Margaret Rutherford talk page. If you like The Man with a Movie Camera, and judging by your musical tastes, have you heard the Biosphere album that is inspired by the film. I think you'd like it. There are also two other versions, one by Michael Nyman and one by The Cinematic Orchestra. Just a friendly suggestion. --  Funky Monkey   (talk)   00:14, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Civilp1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Civilp1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sotpqw 16:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:P1000740.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:P1000740.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aerial sm.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aerial sm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Csm1701


text:
User:Red Darwin

Hi, my handle is Red Darwin. That's my nome de Wiki, you might say.

I am a Southern boy who is not a Red Stater, thus the irony in my handle. I am not religious and an ardent believer in science. I believe the scientific method is the greatest human thought yet.

Here's a hint of my origins: Go Falcons! Michael Vick Rules!

Here's another hint to my nome de Wiki: I'm part Cherokee. Still can't figure out where I'm from? Think of a famous Ray Charles song.

As for me? I am a freelance writer who's worked in proofreading, and was advised by a friend (whose name I shan't reveal!) that the Wiki crowd was a good place to brush up on my skills. That is when I've time to spare- better than porno sites, right? Too many run-on sentences and mispunctuations. Plus, I hope to do occasional articles and links and additions in topics as wide-ranging as pro wrestling to evolution to world literature to Burma, Walt Whitman, and William F. Buckley. I've been a contributor to articles published in numerous magazines including Sports Illustrated, and assorted outdoorsman publications.

As you might guess from my nome de Wiki I love provocateurs like Charles Darwin, Walt Whitman, William F. Buckley, Albert Einstein, Mohandas Gandhi, and Isaac Newton.

I look forward to working in the community, but be warned- the wrath of my red pen knows no bounds! Ok, no red pens here, but mind your p's, q's, and semi-colons! However, I shall err at first, so forgive, and I shall improve to something aimed at divinity.

First Article Created
I have created my first article, a literary entry on storySouth magazine. Red Darwin 22:51, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Copyright Info
For those with copyright concerns a good place to see what is and is not kosher is this link:

http://www.copyright.gov/

and specifically this one:

http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107

Hope this helps. Cheers, Red Darwin 18:55, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User:Red Darwin


text:
User talk:Tyrhinis

WP bookmarks
Vandalism templates

Kevin McQuay
I've reverted your recent edits here. The information you added regarding a "celebrity stalk" by Ross Noble isn't overly encyclopedic. Perhaps in Mr Nobles' article, but not this one. -- Longhair 22:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

 * Fair enough. I wasn't really sure about them, I thought it might be a nice aside. Tyrhinis 20:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Book cover use
Hi. I've been at WP for a little while but never really done anything substantial. My first big edit was creating & writing the article on 9tail Fox, which is an sf novel. Not long ago, some kind user added a whole template box thingy to it (What're those things called? top right of the article) and I thought I'd have a go at filling it it, but got stuck on the "image of cover" bit.

I've read WP:FU, and it says low-res book covers are allowed but equally the Upload page specifically says not to upload an image from the Web. My question is: do I have to go rent the book from my library and scan in the cover to be able to upload it as, or can I just use a reasonably-sized pic from Google Images?  Please response on my talk page or at 9tail Fox, I'll never remember to check back here. Thanks for reading this! Tyrhinis 20:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

 * As it says on the Upload page, "Most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not appropriate for uploading to Wikipedia." In this case, the book cover is copyrighted, and any image of the cover is copyrighted by the artist or publisher, but you should be able to upload the image under fair use. Just tag it with book cover and post a link back to the source. —  The KMan  talk  20:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

 * I've just replaced your image with one that I'd uploaded (mainly because I'd not checked to see if there was already an image there; my bad, sorry!). There's a not-quite-policy of using images from Amazon.com; see Images from Amazon.com for more details. Good work on the article, though; JCG is one of my favourite authors atm. — OwenBlacker 17:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Jon Courtenay Grimwood
I kinda wanna re-read reMix and redRobe, as well as the Arabesk trilogy, so I'm happy to work on those (after you have done so, if you prefer). But yeah, that sounds like a deal to me.

I'm spending less time on here than I used to, so I might take a while, but I do monitor the RSS feed of my User talk page, so leave me a message if you need… — OwenBlacker 12:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ignoto.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ignoto.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Windsor logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:University of Windsor logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tyrhinis


text:
User talk:Fozi999

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Alan Au 18:32, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

LA World Airports
The reason it got listed in there was because I used AutoWikiBrowser to make the lists. I didn't go back though and check each airport. Thanks for catching it. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I guessed that you must have used an automatic method to make the list (and what a helpful list it is!). I just thought I'd make sure it was crossed out to avoid any confusion. --Fozi999 00:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Airbus A380 landing in Heathrow
Hi there - sorry about this, I'm really an idiot. I had read the headline and just assumed the article was on a different subject without even scrolling further down. Thanks for cleaning up the mess I made :) — QuantumEleven 07:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, when I originally saw the article I nearly made the same mistake. --Fozi999 12:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Towers Times Link
Im no towers times fan, but its pathetic to go out of your way to make sure the link is removed from the wikipedia article, and your website is at the top.

This is probably considered link spamming by wikipedia, but im no expert.

Maybe you have a valied reason why it shouldnt be included though?
 * Trust me, I have no such agenda. I read this and I honestly had no idea I'd ever removed the link.  I checked my edits and it seems I'm right.  I presume you're pathetic accusations refer to this edit.  Have another look, the link I removed is a duplicate as Towers Times is already 3rd in the list.  --Fozi999 10:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:CityCampusEast.JPG
Hi. It's ages since I've been at that side of the city -- is that where the Warner cinema used to be? The JPS  talk to me  14:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's the site. I took that photo on the spare of the moment.  I might try to get some shots from better angles next time I'm passing.  It might make it's location a bit clearer. --Fozi999 17:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Airport articles
Sure it's at http://www.alansim.com/airport_infobox.xls Usual thing, just right click to save. Hope it works for you. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Map sources
I was just wondering if it's a good idea to be putting in _region:DE (and others)? The thing is it leads to this which is in German rather than this which is in English and we are an English Wikipeda. However I do see that Flughafen London-Heathrow in the German Wikipedia uses _region:GB which of course links to the English so in the end I guess it doesn't really matter. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I noticed that but only after I'd made the changes. I was reading the Parameters section of the Geographical Coordinates Wikiproject and it seemed like a sensible idea.  In fact for the UK the result it is much better than the previous format.  Personally the German doesn't make it a problem for me to understand the page but if you think it’s necessary I could revert them back to their original format.  However, I suppose the real solution would be to have pages in different language for each region but I'm not sure if that wiki has them. --Fozi999 10:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * At first I thought it was probably not a good idea but after I saw that the German Wikipedia had them linked to the English I figured it doesn't really matter. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Additions to coaster infobox require article updating, need help
I've made several large additions to the Infobox roller coaster template, which will require updating of EVERY article using it. These additions are automatic unit conversion for the statistics and automatic categorization. I have also provided full documentation of every parameter on the template page, which I strongly encourage you to read. Every article will need the following changes:

 * These parameters must be delinked: location, section, manufacturer, and type. They will be automatically linked, and will (except for section) be used for automatic categorization.
 * The type parameter must be Steel or Wood.
 * The secondary type (Inverted, Floorless, Duelling etc.) should be moved to the type2 parameter. If a second secondary type is necessary, it goes in type3. In either case, don't link them, it will be done automatically.
 * height, drop, length, speed, and restriction must have all non-numeric characters removed. height, drop, and length must be expressed in feet (using decimals instead of inches if necessary), speed must be expressed in miles per hour, and restriction must be expressed in inches. All of these parameters will automatically be converted to metric and displayed in both forms.

Also, the rcdb_number parameter should be added to every coaster article that doesn't have it yet.

If the article is about a widely-cloned coaster such as Batman: The Ride where the template covers multiple installations of the same coaster, the redesigned template will not be appropriate. For these articles, simply change the template to "Infobox roller coaster simplified". This is the old version, without all the automation.

I've already updated over 50 articles myself, but I can't do this all day and I'll need your help to get it done quickly. The list of pages using the template can be found here. I'm sending this message to all listed participants of WikiProject Roller Coasters. Dusso Janladde 07:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:CityCampusEast.06-07-2006.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:CityCampusEast.06-07-2006.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Brain Teaser AfD
To all WikiProject Roller coasters participants: Brain Teaser, a kiddie coaster at Six Flags Darien Lake is up for deletion via WP:AFD. This isn't my article, but if it's deleted, it sets the prescident for many small coasters to be deleted, such as Mild Thing, which runs counter to the Coaster Wikiproject and also will make a lot of park templates look dumb since they can't include all coasters. Dusso Janladde 20:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:DSC00014-2.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC00014-2.JPG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SantaAnaVol.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SantaAnaVol.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Angr 20:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Tyne and Wear
Hi there, I'm currently considering making a wikiproject called Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyne and Wear and I'm just wondering if you would be interested in joining if and when It's created as I noticed from a user category you live in County Durham. It would be all about improving and creating wikipedia articles relating to Tyne and Wear. If you have any questions, comments please tell me on my talk page and if you know any other users who maybe interested in joining please feel free to tell them as it will need a few members in order to make it run smoothly. I will also be willing to create the project page and templates etc if there are enough active members. Please leave your name here if you are interested. Could you also please tell me whether you are interested or not on my talk page - You can take as-long as you require to decide! Thanks.  Telly addict Editor review! 16:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiprojects Airports
Who can i become a wiki projects airports? I would love to thanks User LOTkid 18:00 Febrary 27,2007 (UTC)
 * You just need to add your name to the project participants at WikiProject_Airports/Participants. Then you can help with the projects listed there. --Fozi999 13:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject roller coasters
Hi there, just to let you know that WP:ROCO has been given an overhaul. As you are listed as a participant, I just thought I'd let you know that there's a new to-do section and much clearer guidelines for roller coaster articles. Hope to see you over there! Sea serpent 85Talk 09:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maximo.applysome1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maximo.applysome1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maximo.coast.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maximo.coast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Releases applysomepressure.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Releases applysomepressure.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, December 2007
Sea serpent 85 22:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ArcticMonkeysSNL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ArcticMonkeysSNL.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, January 2008
Sea serpent 85 14:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Catcfl.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Catcfl.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Roller Coasters Newsletter, February 2008
Sea serpent 85 20:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Photo request
Since yoy are from County Durham, I am hoping that you can help me out. For spite house, please photograph the Edleston Spite House located next to St. Mary's in Gainford, County Durham England if you are near that area. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 01:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jet2Logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jet2Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Arctic Monkeys
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Arctic Monkeys/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  00:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:AT Coasters
Template:AT Coasters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 05:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Canyon Blaster (Six Flags Magic Mountain)

The article Canyon Blaster (Six Flags Magic Mountain) has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * This roller coaster is a mass-produced roller coaster. There are two other roller coasters that have the exact same layout/characteristics of this roller coaster. A search on Google and Yahoo returned no reliable secondary sources regarding the roller coaster that could be included to support the notability of the topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dom497 ( talk ) 02:28, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Stava.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stava.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Canyon Blaster (Six Flags Magic Mountain) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canyon Blaster (Six Flags Magic Mountain) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Canyon Blaster (Six Flags Magic Mountain) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fozi999


text: User talk:65.82.182.239

title: User talk:65.82.182.239


text:
User talk:Dark9wolfpuppy9

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --玉米^ō^麦兜 18:32, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:Dark9wolfpuppy9


text:
Juniperus californica

Juniperus californica, the California juniper, is a species of juniper native to southwestern North America.

Description
Juniperus californica is a shrub or small tree reaching 3 - 8 m, but rarely up to 10 m tall. The bark is ashy gray, typically thin, and appears to be "shredded". The shoots are fairly thick compared to most junipers, between 1.5 and 2 mm in diameter.

The foliage is bluish-gray and scale-like. The juvenile leaves (on the seedlings) are needle-like and 5 to 10 mm long. Arranged in opposite decussate pairs or whorls of three, the adult leaves are scale-like, 1 to 5 mm long on lead shoots and 1 to 1.5 mm broad.

The cones are berrylike, 7 to 13 mm in diameter, blue-brown with a whitish waxy bloom, turning reddish-brown, and contain a single seed (rarely two or three). The seeds are mature in about 8 or 9 months. The male cones are 2 to 4 mm long and shed their pollen in early spring. This juniper is largely dioecious, producing cones of only one sex, but around 2% of plants are monoecious, with both sexes on the same plant.

The California juniper is closely related to the Utah juniper (J. osteosperma) from further east, which shares the stout shoots and relatively large cones, but differs in that Utah juniper is largely monoecious. Its cones take longer to mature (two growing seasons), and it is also markedly more cold-tolerant.

Distribution and habitat
As the name implies, it is mainly in numerous California habitats, although its range also extends through most of Baja California, a short distance into the Great Basin in southern Nevada, and into northwestern Arizona. In California it is found in: the Peninsular Ranges, Transverse Ranges, California Coast Ranges, Sacramento Valley foothills, Sierra Nevada, and at higher elevation sky islands in the Mojave Desert ranges. It is also found off of the North American continental shelf, on Guadalupe Island in the Pacific Ocean, where there are less than 10 individuals.

It grows at moderate altitudes of 750 - 1600 m. Habitats include: pinyon–juniper woodland with single-leaf pinyon (Pinus monophylla); Joshua tree woodland; and foothill woodlands, in the montane chaparral and woodlands and interior chaparral and woodlands sub-ecoregions.

Conservation
The species is listed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature as least concern, and not considered globally threatened. However, one of the southernmost populations, formerly on Guadalupe Island off the Baja California Peninsula coast, was almost destroyed by feral goats in the late 19th century, with only a few plants remaining.

Ecology
J. californica provides food and shelter for a variety of native species, such as turkeys, deer, and many others. However, as the species matures, it becomes too tall to provide adequate food and shelter for deer and other ground animals of similar size. is a larval host for the native moth sequoia sphinx (Sphinx sequoiae).

Uses
The plant was used as a traditional Native American medicinal plant, and as a food source, by the indigenous peoples of California, including the Cahuilla people, Kumeyaay people (Diegueno), Serrano, and Ohlone people. They gathered the berries to eat fresh and to grind into meal for baking. The wood was also used for sinew-backed bows.

J. californica is cultivated as an ornamental plant, as a dense shrub (and eventual tree) for use in habitat gardens, heat and drought-tolerant gardens, and in natural landscaping design. It is very tolerant of alkali soil, and can provide erosion control on dry slopes. It is also a popular species for bonsai.

title: Juniperus californica


text:
2006 Fed Cup

The 2006 Fed Cup was the 44th edition of the most important competition between national teams in women's tennis.

The final took place at Spiroudome in Charleroi, Belgium, on 16–17 September. The home team, Belgium, lost to Italy, 2–3, giving Italy their first title in their first final and Belgium's second final.

World Group play-offs
The four losing teams in the World Group first round ties (Austria, France, Germany and Russia), and four winners of the World Group II ties (China, Croatia, Czech Republic and Japan) entered the draw for the World Group play-offs.

Date: 15–16 July

World Group II
The World Group II was the second highest level of Fed Cup competition in 2006. Winners will advance to the World Group play-offs, and losers played in the World Group II play-offs.

Date: 22–23 April

World Group II play-offs
The four losing teams from World Group II (Argentina, Indonesia, Switzerland and Thailand) played off against qualifiers from Zonal Group I. Two teams qualified from Europe/Africa Zone (Israel and Slovakia), one team from the Asia/Oceania Zone (Australia), and one team from the Americas Zone (Canada).

Date: 14–15 July

Americas Zone

 * Nations in bold advanced to the higher level of competition.
 * Nations in italics were relegated down to a lower level of competition.

Group I
Venue: Club Campestre de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia (outdoor clay)

Dates: 19–22 April

 * Participating Teams

Group II
Venue: Parque del Este, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (outdoor hard)

Dates: 18–20 April

 * Participating Teams

Asia/Oceania Zone

 * Nations in bold advanced to the higher level of competition.
 * Nations in italics were relegated down to a lower level of competition.

Group I
Venue: Olympic Park, Seoul, South Korea (outdoor hard)

Dates: 20–22 April

 * Participating Teams

Group II
Venue: Olympic Park, Seoul, South Korea (outdoor hard)

Dates: 20–21 April

 * Participating Teams

Europe/Africa Zone

 * Nations in bold advanced to the higher level of competition.
 * Nations in italics were relegated down to a lower level of competition.

Group I
Venue: TC Lokomotiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria (outdoor clay)

Dates: 17–22 April

 * Participating Teams

Group II
Venue: Club Ali Bey, Manavgat, Antalya, Turkey (outdoor clay)

Dates: 26–29 April

 * Participating Teams

Group III
Venue: Club Ali Bey, Manavgat, Antalya, Turkey (outdoor clay)

Dates: 26–29 April

 * Participating Teams

Rankings
The rankings were measured after the three points during the year that play took place, and were collated by combining points earned from the previous four years.

title: 2006 Fed Cup


text:
HMCS Huron

Several Canadian naval units have been named HMCS Huron.

 * HMCS Huron (G24) was a Second World War Tribal-class destroyer (1936) destroyer.
 * HMCS Huron (DDG 281) was an Iroquois-class destroyer active from 1972 to 2005.

Battle Honours
 * Atlantic, 1943
 * Arctic, 1943–1945
 * Biscay, 1943–1944
 * Norway, 1945
 * Korea, 1952–1953

title: HMCS Huron


text:
User:Maxamegalon2000

Hi. Maybe I should mention some of my subpages. There's User:Maxamegalon2000/Highlights, which I wrote a while ago and haven't updated since. There's also the VandalProof pages, User:Maxamegalon2000/VandalismLog and User:Maxamegalon2000/VandalismStats, which haven't been updated in even longer since I haven't used it lately. I should get on that.

Oh, look. Userboxes. Great.

Also, barnstars.

title: User:Maxamegalon2000


text: User talk:65.94.117.169

title: User talk:65.94.117.169


title: User:Mp3downloads


text:
Hall i' th' Wood railway station

Hall i' th' Wood railway station is the last stop before Bolton on the Northern Trains franchise's Ribble Valley line into Blackburn and Clitheroe in England.

The station opened by British Rail on 29 September 1986. It is located in the middle of a housing estate and forms an unofficial footpath between the two sides. In March 2008 work began on a new car park for the station.

It takes its name from the nearby Hall i' th' Wood, now a museum which is within walking distance of the station.

Facilities
The station is unmanned and has basic amenities - waiting shelters and timetable posters on each platform, plus a telephone. The wooden platforms are staggered, with the southbound one the further north of the two. There is no step-free access to either platform (the ramps from the road that passes beneath the line both have steps).

Services
The former franchise operator Arriva Rail North announced a much enhanced all day half-hourly service Weekdays and Saturdays in both directions from Dec 2017, rather than merely at morning and evening peak periods as before. The additional services however start/terminate at Blackburn, so the service through to Clitheroe remains hourly; southbound trains extend through to Rochdale. The Sunday service is hourly to Clitheroe and Manchester.

The timetable was affected by weekend engineering work south of Bolton (as part of the heavily delayed Manchester to Preston Line electrification project) for much of 2018.

title: Hall i' th' Wood railway station


text:
User talk:Maxamegalon2000/Archive 1

This is my page. I guess.

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Durin 18:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanx! Maxamegalon2000 14:23:54, 2005-09-01 (UTC)

Survivor Panama
Hi. I've reverted your edit about how the tribes are going to be split up because a source has not been cited regarding that information. Remember that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. If you have a reliable, preferrably official source that you got that infomation from, please add a reference to it. Otherwise, Thanks. Jtrost 15:00, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I'd assumed that the link to survivorfever.net at the end of the article would suffice.  My bad. --Maxamegalon2000 03:42, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Hey, just wanted to let you know that the user who kept screwing with the external links violated the 3RR policy. I reported him to the admins here, and if all goes well he'll be blocked for 24 hours. You may add any comments about the situation there. Jtrost 23:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: 3RR
The 3RR rule only applies when the page is reverted more than three times. However, I think he'll revert it again before 24 hours is up. New cases can be reported here. I've already filled out the template for the first three times. So if he reverts the page again before 15:01 tomorrow (Feb 7), put in the difference link and the time where it says 4th revert, and post it on the admin's noticeboard.

User:67.80.3.198
Three revert rule violation on. :

 * Previous version reverted to: 12:35, February 5, 2006
 * 1st revert: 15:01, February 6, 2006
 * 2nd revert: 15:31, February 6, 2006
 * 3rd revert: 15:50, February 6, 2006
 * 4th revert: [DiffLink Time]

Reported by: ~

Comments: Jtrost 23:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * User has been reported twice before, but never banned. Please ban him this time.

Mike McCarthy and metrics
Having taken a Wikivacation, largely to make predictions about, and then to watch, the Games of the XXth Winter Olympiad, I have just now found time to respond to your comments with respect, inter al., to the locution "yards gained metric" formerly found in the McCarthy article; such response is made on the relevant talk page. Cordially, Joe 04:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Doctor Who. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -    nath  a  nrdotcom  ( T •  C  • W) 05:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Terre Haute, Indiana, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

ABA Journal
Interesting source, but please tell me that Thompson and the station had a 1987 agreement, not a 1997 agreement. --Michael Snow 04:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Two things: If Thompson was charged with lying over an accusation he made about Stuart Grossman, what did he accuse Grossman of? Also, in the context of bar disciplinary proceedings, it would be better not to say "pled guilty", that kind of terminology really should be limited to criminal cases. --Michael Snow 00:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Games obsession
I see you started a deletion discussion over the article Games obsession; however, I cannot find the tag in the article's history. Would you mind going back and completing the three-step afd process listed at Template:AfD in 3 steps? Thanks. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 20:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Block
What did you do to get blocked in the first place. Or what did the reason for the block say? --LBMixPro<Sp e ak 00:54, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Curps for the following reason (see our blocking policy): "vandalism from this IP range, sorry. Complain to mailto:abuse@sbcglobal.net, 800-648-1626"

Your IP address is 75.12.132.167.

I can't find what edits this address is responsible for. Obviously, they're not mine. --Maxamegalon2000 01:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh, you're IP range was blocked, sorry, but it will be over soon, i'll go check the block log for ya. Sasquatch t|c 01:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It appears from the block log that your ISP has been the source of some grief for Wikipedia. The block expires in 24 hours and there's not much we can do until then. Sorry! But I would suggest a change of ISPs if possible. Sasquatch t|c 01:10, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

I guess I can sit on my hands for a while. In the meantime, could someone revert the latest edit at Marquette University for me? The content and username just scream bad faith. Thanx. --Maxamegalon2000 01:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Bummer that you're paying the price for someone else's abuse here on Wikipedia. I've reverted that glaring example of inappropriate editing in the meantime. Take it easy. Netscott 04:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Email
Interesting angle, but I don't think it's something for Wikipedia to get into. First of all, email addresses are not necessarily owned by only one person, and the fact that an address was used to register for two things doesn't show that the same person used it both times. Second of all, saying that someone operates a particular website based on its registration, and simply linking to the site, is pretty elementary. Whereas saying that someone has a particular account on LiveJournal is either pointless, or it requires a whole lot more context to make clear what the point is. Providing that context, and synthesizing the material so that it's not disproportionate to the article, would get into massive problems of editorializing that isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. And weren't most of the LiveJournal accounts in question suspended anyway, so most of the "evidence" is gone? Anyway, too much of this is well into original research territory, so it wouldn't be acceptable. --Michael Snow 00:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey, thanks!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage by 65.138.69.102, you're fast! They've been blocked for 24 hours. :)

~Kylu ( u | t )  02:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Discussion
Thanks for contacting me, I wouldnt have seen your reply for a few days. I replied to that and will continue to monitor the discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesinclair (talk • contribs)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Maxamegalon2000! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (talk) 01:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Your vandalism of Dale Earnhardt
Please don't remove facts from the article. The fact that you don't like it doesn't make it false. 24.177.115.191 02:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Roger Ambrose page discussion
Maxamegalon2000,

Thank you for your points and advise. I am a little burnt out on all the discussion over this article. All I want to do is make this right. I just happened to come upon all this because it was my day off and I was checking in. I'd like an article on wikipedia, but don't see the value in it if everyone is just into fighting over it. I will survive the loss, but still think it is a little un-fair to see all of the porno starlettes getting a pass for their "up standing" and "notable" work and someone as myself (with 25 years and 2 emmy awards) scoring a big "zero" in the eyes of the general community. I had been warn about all this, but it was only after today that I really have begun to believe these warnings.

Again my sincere thanks,

Roger C. Ambrose: Production Designer (of questionable note) Roger ambrose 05:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

 * writen by: Maxamegalon2000 01:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC) to R.Ambrose:
 * Userfy and rewrite by someone else per Sandstein. The changes certainly help, but I'm concerned that the article may be too flowery on the whole to salvage.  I've always been a bit confused abot the amount of trust we're supposed to place on the information people who write their own articles add.  At this point, Mr. Ambrose, I would recommend regardless of the outcome of this review that you collect as many independent sources as you can find for the article; an article based on reliable and verifiable sources will create a lot less of a fuss.

 * Maxamegalon2000, As I follow the discussion and arguements back and forth, I am confused by your advise to me here to collect as many independent sources as I can find for this article. If I am hearing several other editors on this, even if I did this I am not allowed to be involved in the article. This needs clarification. Additionally on the Bob Fink article/discussion I see that editors frown on even close "associates" from being involved. I want to play by the rules and get along here but as a newbie I am at a loss as to the "yes" and/or "no" of this all. Roger ambrose 01:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Interesting development on Articles for deletion/Roger Ambrose. Ambrose is continuing to add POV material to his article through an IP, even after he seemed to agree to let a "third party" [his quotations] edit it. --JChap 00:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Roger Ambrose
I'm not really all that sure that the subject's involvement in an article should affect its AfD. I don't understand why your opinion on Ambrose's notability is affected by his actions at the article. I mean, when Jack Thompson (attorney) tried to add to his article, we didn't delete it, we considered his addition and decided it was vandalism. (Of course, then he threatened to sue.) If the problem is that Roger wrote the article himself, then the solution is a rewrite, not to delete. I don't think anyone is arguing against a rewrite. --Maxamegalon2000 00:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your thoughts. I didn't participate in the Thompson discussion, so I cannot comment knowledgeably on it. My problem with his actions is this. He created his own page. It was deleted. He created it again several days later. I put this into AfD. He claimed not to know that you cannot recreate a deleted article so soon and that writing your own article was frowned upon. There was extensive discussion about this with him. As a result of this discussion, he promised to let a "third party" create the article. (No one commented at the time that he put the words third party in quotation marks.) Batman2005 indicated his willingness to try to work on the article. After that, Ambrose goes back (a short while ago) and makes blatant POV edits to his article. Now he claims (on the AfD page) that he did this because we did not give him a definite "NO." I know we are supposed to assume good faith here, but his actions tell me he is going to POV push this thing. I think the AfD page speaks for itself. --JChap 00:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

 * It shouldn't. You're right.  I originally nominated the article for deletion and was only pursuaded to tentative keep by Batman2005.  I agree that there are a lot of non-notable people on Wikipedia, but do not think that this is an argument for adding more.  He is at best a borderline case.  The benefit of having this information in the article is not worth the danger that it will turn into a vanity article (we miss too many already) and make Wikipedia look silly (since he'll be linked from a disambig, there will probably be hits on this page, at least by people misclicking). This was a bit of a pity keep for me (and that's not commendable on my part either).  I'm going to take 24 hours and cool down before I make any final decisions on this one, but would welcome any further thoughts you might have in the meantime. --JChap 00:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Duly noted, thank you. Roger ambrose 03:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

B.J. Averell
You seem to have been exceedingly cordial and cooperative with the anon editor (who, as you say, has himself been willing to comport his editing with our policies), for which you are to be commended (were I not so tired, I'd give you a barnstar; perhaps I'll find one tomorrow). I dropped a note at Talk:B.J. Averell and at Hexa's talk page offering my thoughts on the matter, and I'll try to watch the page in order that I might offer guidance to him as well. For now, though, you seem to have the situation well in hand, and it is to your credit that, through your civility, you've recruited an ostensibly intelligent individual to the project (it's possible, I think, that he/she will stay after having dealt with the Averell article; in any event, you've surely ensured that at least one prospective public relations problem will be avoided). :) Joe 06:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

 * Just wanted to say thanks for linking me back. You seem to have things under control, great work on the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesinclair (talk • contribs)

 * I replied to your note on the talk page; in short, I agree with you that Hexa, though surely acting in good faith and abiding by our policies and guidelines on the whole, removed some information that is appropriate and consistent with our principles. You're more familiar than I with the subject – at the very least, you've been involved with the article longer than I–so I'll let you handle the relevant revisions (namely, returning the "late for flight" factoid and the lawyer quote and crafting a brief entry about Averell's campus candidacy, one without trivial details but also one that's not sanitized simply for Averell's benefit), but I'll certainly back up any action you take consistent with your talk page post and the general principles on which we agree.  Cordially, Joe 02:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment from Roger C. Ambrose
FYI: I have posted a comment: Roger ambrose 01:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Wii Talk Page
Hi. I made a new post on the Wii talk, wanted to let you know. I put it on the current Wii Talk Page.aido2002 21:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Tagi AFD
I posted a message like this on the Tagi AFD page. It was for you and three other editors. You wanted to make it a redirect. I said that if Tagi becomes a redirect why not every tribe in Survivor history? What makes it special?TeckWizTalk Contribs Guestbook 11:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Nintendo Wii Links
Thanks for notifying me of the link "screening process". I never would have known otherwise. I have brought it up on the Wii talk page as you suggested. huntersquid 20:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

3rr warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

You did four non-vandalism reverts in the Dwyane Wade article in less than 24 hours, and using pop-ups as well. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 19:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Man. thanks for the heads up. I can't figure out why people were attacking the Sci Fi listing, it seems like it got railroaded even when the final consensus was to keep them. rxdxt 21:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Wii
Hi, keeping those links is against Reliable Sources. Please read my comment at Talk:Wii. Mushroom (Talk) 15:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Aphilia
Actually we use this term in university and I know some other universities use it. Zyprexa is assciated. Thank you for your patience.Tommymyers 21:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

TNA iMPACT! ratings
Hi. The tag that was removed by User:70.134.108.151 was a proposed deletion tag, not a speedy one; it's removal was the proper procedure. I'm sure your edit was just a mistake. --Maxamegalon2000 17:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Doh! Mistake noted. --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  20:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Jack Thompson
Care to explain your reverts? Under WP:RS a primary source such as the one used, is perfectly fine at Wiki. If you have a problem with it, state your reasons so that I can know what they are or if you are violating WP:DICK. Ramsquire 21:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Ok! I see what you are saying. I'll check the AP to see if they have anything on it. That should be sufficient.  I apologize if I came across as angry, but without the explanation, I'm sure you can see why I'd be wary that I might simply be dealing with a vandal.  It's all good now, though.Ramsquire 22:17, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Hey can you vandal lock the Thompson article again. GP did another story on him, and the vandals came out of the woodwork.--Tollwutig 15:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Mario Storyline
I will not revert your edit, but please note that an article having survived an AFD has no bearing whatsoever on that article being edited, including being turned into a redirect, or, even, it being deleted again. No binding decisions. Also note the result of the AFD was "keep and cleanup", so I might suggest that you perform said cleanup, and perhaps my concerns about the article will be resolved.-SB | T 04:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

About Salman Khan Article
Hello! Maxamegalon,

Absolutely great job done in reverting the vandalism, on Salman Khan's article. My best wishes and warm regards.

-LuckyS

Canadian Idiot
Here, since you're so damn sure that "Canadian Idiot" isn't a real Weird Al song, then you can download it yourself.

''I have removed the provided link, though I will gladly attest to the accuracy of the above description. --Maxamegalon2000 03:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)''

I have to have lyrics. Can you post them on this talk page please-User:Yoda's Yoda's Can you please put it as a directlink on my talk page-User:Yoda's Yoda's

Dwayne Wade
Hi -- I'm sure this wasn't your intention, but: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dwyane_Wade&diff=prev&oldid=75355614

I just thought that was strange. Browser bug? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Email
I did get your message and have sent a reply. It supposedly was sent successfully, but my email program did appear to hang during the process, so maybe it didn't go through properly. If you haven't received it yet, let me know and I'll resend it. --Michael Snow 22:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

This Providence, Weird Al, Et. Al.
Why are fan websites and other interviews not considered spam but our interviews are? You say WP is not a vehicle for advertising, but I fail to see how it's any different than a fan website, which is a personal website. By that rationale it seems logical to me to delete all fan websites; that distinguishing between leaders and non-leader websites can be a subjective line to cross. I guess I can understand reviews but not interviews since it's content, which you (and the FAQ) mentioned before. If you notice, we have no advertisements on our site and we're not commercial. Is it because we have opinion? You allow an Onion article on the Weird Al page and they're obviously a commercial site. I would appreciate clarification.

Mhudson3

Thank you for your greeting
I already log in with name user:Saeng Sayam. This is last time for editing page in wikipedia with IP address. ````

New Question
Ok, so I have a question regarding all of this commercial website stuff because my editor is asking me why we can't add stuff and maybe he has a good point, I don't know.

Let's take Jericho for an example. There are external links to TV Squad reviews and TV.com listings, both of which are commercial websites and have ads (whereas we don't). You could debate the whole TV.com thing as legit, given it's just listing, but these are hardly single-topic websites like Fallout @ Kryptonsite. They both go to the Jericho category for those sites, which we have done with other similar shows like Studio 60, etc, that you've removed.

Even BalthCat says in the discussion pages when asked about adding links, "Anyone can review a show and put it online." and he/she is absolutely right. And yet the link is still there.

I've read the FAQ and maybe I'm missing a nuance here and if I am, please explain. I'd like to know what the difference between us and TVSquad.com is as far as what makes them legit and not us. Maybe they add trivia and stuff about the show, I don't know, and that's what makes the difference in the wiki world. But on the surface, it appears to be the same situation.

Thanks for the help.

--Mhudson3 22:04, 04 October 2006 (UTC)

A question
My artical has been marked for speedy deletaion. I posted my reason why it should NOT be delated. I don't get any replys.

Thank you for your response
Hi, Maxamegalon2000. I am Meno25. Thank you for your response on my question here.

--84.36.143.135 17:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Jack Thompson Part Two
Hey, just a requests. I can understand, with the scrutiny on the Jack Thompson articles (like the WP:OFFICE issue earlier this year), how you hold references in that article to a higher WP:RS then other articles, and I've tried to update that on the article's talk page, but just a request.

Even if you don't feel that the reference belongs in the article, don't revert the other changes I made (with regards to paragraphs) blindly. It's not really a big deal, but it makes the article more readable etcetera, and should be kept in the article even if the WP:RS doesn't meet the (at least to my mind) absurdly high standards. Yes, you don't want every two bit gaming site jumbling up the article, however, higher quality gaming sites SHOULD be used as WP:RS in the article.

Thompson even admits it's true [in this article] '''However, that has not stopped the attorney from attacking Take-Two in a flurry of e-mails sent out to media outlets. "The motion to show cause filed by defendant Take-Two is a transparent, panicked attempt to cover up the misconduct, including the fraudulent misrepresentations to the public and to this Court, by its employees and its counsel, Blank Rome," Thompson said in an e-mail.'''

'"If this court in any'' fashion proceeds toward issuing a show cause order, given its utter baselessness and the bad faith goo in which it slithers, then Thompson will add whatever judge should do so as a defendant in the aforementioned federal civil rights action," he said, referring to the case he brought to halt Bully's sale. (Emphasis in the original.) "Plaintiff has seen arbitrariness from judges before in his thirty years of practicing law, but nothing close to this. If the federal judiciary must restrain this Court and punish it, then so be it." '''

I will also post this to the talk page.

Sorry for the extra long post. Thanks! SirFozzie 05:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the rational discussion, it may be an "agree to disagree" situation, I guess :) Oh well, if we agreed all the time, life would be boring, huh? Anyway, as I said on the talk page, I restored the paragraphs but NOT the disputed info. SirFozzie 05:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The Tuck Profit
You have marked my page on The Tuck Profit for deletion, citing it as a Non-notable student newspaper. Although it is not the official student newspaper of the Tuck School of Business (that would be the Tuck Times), I assure you that this is a legitimate online publication that is enjoyed by the students at Tuck. Please let me know exactly what your objection to this page is so that I may address your concerns.

Weird Al links
Thanks for catching that. I removed those sites in error. Cheers. L0b0t 17:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
You're right. I should not have removed the speedy deletion tag. I apologize for that. My concern with tagging this article for deletion is that "notability" is a subjective term that has never been adequately explained as far as Wikipedia's policy is concerned. It seems to me that several criteria apply to "notability" - those who rise to the pinnacle of their careers and those articles which are connected to others within this database. I believe this article meets both of those criteria.

Reply to Message
I was not trying to get the article deleted. I was just trying to type an article for the Pokémon and screwed up. I am sorry if I gave you a false impression.--Linkmasta 04:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Reply
I did add hangon to notorious ali. Lebo Thug 06:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

nbajunkie.com
what the hell are you talking about? do you have the right to block me? and do you have the right to remove links that i enjoy watching? i would say no to all of the account. i watch your history and you seem like trolling around editing tons of pages. why dont you stick with subjects that you love instead of threatening other wikipedians. thanks. --User 76.185.122.79

title: User talk:Maxamegalon2000/Archive 1


text: User talk:68.61.209.142

title: User talk:68.61.209.142


text:
HMCS Iroquois

Several Canadian naval units have been named HMCS Iroquois.

 * HMCS Iroquois (G89), a Second World War Tribal-class destroyer.
 * HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280), an Iroquois-class (or New-Tribal-class) destroyer commissioned in 1972.

Battle honours
 * Atlantic, 1943
 * Arctic, 1943–1945
 * Biscay, 1943–1944
 * Norway, 1945
 * Korea, 1952–1953
 * Arabian Sea

title: HMCS Iroquois


text:
User talk:Dguinnessy

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --玉米^ō^麦兜 18:35, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:Dguinnessy


text: Category:World Heritage Sites in Turkmenistan


text:
List of colleges in Kanyakumari district

Kanyakumari ranks first in literacy among the districts of Tamil Nadu. The district has many educational institutions. The following are lists of colleges in the district of Kanyakumari.


text:
Mariposa War

The Mariposa War (December 1850 – June 1851), also known as the Yosemite Indian War, was a conflict between the United States and the indigenous people of California's Sierra Nevada in the 1850s. The war was fought primarily in Mariposa County and surrounding areas, and was sparked by the discovery of gold in the region. As a result of the military expedition, the Mariposa Battalion became the first non-indigenous group to enter Yosemite Valley and the Nelder Grove.

The war began in 1850 when miners entered the area of the Sierra Nevada foothills, which was traditionally occupied by the Ahwahnechee, a band of the Southern Sierra Miwok people. The miners began to take over the Ahwahnechee's land and resources, leading to tensions between the two groups.

The Ahwahnechee, led by their chief Tenaya, fought back against the miners resulting in a series of skirmishes that escalated into a full-scale war. The California state government, under Governor John McDougall, raised the Mariposa Battalion led by Sheriff James D. Savage to subdue the indigenous people.

The war ended in 1851 with the capture of Tenaya and the surrender of his band. The Ahwahnechee were subsequently removed from the Sierra Nevada foothills and forced to live on reservations. The war resulted in the deaths of an unknown number of Ahwahnechee and several miners, and the displacement of the indigenous people from their ancestral lands.

The Mariposa War was a part of the broader historical context of the California genocide and the American Indian Wars. Many European American settlers considered Native Americans to be an "Indian Problem" which they needed to remove. The United States government, California state government, and White settlers enforced deliberate policies of displacement, forced removals, and massacres that drove Native Americans from their traditional lands and onto reservations.

Background
The California Gold Rush was the conflict that caused the California genocide. By the end of May 1849, more than 40,000 gold seekers had used the California Trail to enter northern and central California which had been up until then populated by Native Americans and Californios (the descendants of early Spanish settlers). In two decades 80 percent of Californias Native American population was wiped out. Many California natives died from their land being seized by white settlers or the diseases brought from the new settlers, and about 9,000 from 16,000 were murdered. In three years, the non-Native American population rose from 14,000 in 1848 to 200,000 in 1852. Immigrants had come from Mexico, South America, Europe, Australia, and China.

Miners digging for gold forced Native Americans off their historic lands. Others were pressed into service in the mines; others had their villages raided by the army and volunteer militia. White settlers also thought it was time to get rid of Native Americans due to the fact they thought took up too much labor in the mines.

Mariposa County Sheriff James Burney and Savage led a militia of seventy four men in a retaliatory attack against a Chowchilla camp on the Fresno River near present-day Oakhurst on January 11, 1851. The militia attacked with rifles at daylight but were surprised when the Chowchilla returned fire with rifles and pistols of their own. Surprised and unprepared, Savage's forces staggered and dispersed, resulting in a victory for the Native Americans who killed several and wounded militia members in what would become known as the first battle of the Mariposa War.

Mobilization
Sheriff James Burney made an appeal to John McDougal, the second Governor of California, which led to the creation of the Mariposa Battalion. The California State Militia that was a group of men who volunteered to form the Mariposa Battalion, sanctioned by the state of California, to rid the area of the perceived threat of Indians. They entered Yosemite Valley, systematically burned villages and food supplies and forced men, women, and children away from their homes. There were no native American homes left. Under "Major" James D. Savage, at least one-fifth of the volunteers were Texans and had served previously under Colonel Jack Hays during the Mexican-American War. Its commands were:
 * Company A : 70 men, led by Capt. John J. Kuykendall
 * Company B : 72 men led by Capt. John Boling
 * Company C : 56 men led by Capt. William Dill

Besides the military, officials from the Federal Indian commission sought a peaceful solution. On March 19, 1851, the Commissioners signed a treaty at Camp Fremont aside Mariposa Creek with six tribes. However, as the Ahwahneechees and Chowchillas were absent from the talks, a military campaign was launched against them the same day.

First campaign
The military action began when Company A — led by Captain Kuykendall — proceeded south to the Kings River and upper Kaweah Rivers and to the Tulare Valley. After arriving at the Kings River, scouts located a large Chowchilla village nearby. Company A charged into the Chowchilla camp, killing Native Americans. Some survivors were pursued, ridden down and taken prisoner. However, as Kuykendall's men had abandoned their horses for the village charge, many of the Chowchilla were able to escape on foot.

After the village attack, Kuykendall ordered his command to move onto the headwaters of the Kahweah River where they were unable to locate any more Chowchilla. A few days later, a group of Chowchilla entered their camp to sue for peace. The offer of peace was accepted and arrangements were made to transport the surviving Chowchilla to the reservation on the San Joaquin River. Following the transport, Kuykendall returned to the battalion's camp and headquarters on Mariposa Creek in early April.

Meanwhile, in their first campaign, the companies B and C of Boling and Dill had pursued Native Americans into the mountains where the units often forced to march through rain, sleet and deep snow drifts. on March 27, the companies discovered an Ahwahneechees Yosemite Valley refuge but few natives.

Second Campaign
On April 13, a new campaign against the Chowchilla was launched. Although units from the Mariposa Battalion destroyed the tribe's food stores, most Native Americans were able to elude the militias. However, with the death of their chief, the remaining Chowchilla surrendered and were transported onto a reservation.

Third Campaign
After the Ahwahneechees refused to come to Camp Barbour, the Californian government launched a third campaign against them. The Mariposa Battalion encircled the Ahwahneechees at Lake Tenaija (named after Tenaya) on May 22. With little prospect of winning, the tribe acquiesced and surrendered Yosemite valley and the surrounding areas to the Californian government. The Battalion, acting as guards, marched the natives to the Fresno River Farm Reservation. After the Ahwahneechees were on the reservation, the militia returned to the Mariposa Creek post.

On July 1, 1852, the Mariposa Battalion was mustered out.

title: Mariposa War