text:
User:Nojhan

I'm sysop on fr:, please, see and use fr:Utilisateur:Nojhan for any discussion (even in english).

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User:Nojhan


text:
User talk:Para82

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:
 * Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
 * Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
 * Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
 * Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
 * Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
 * Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
 * Use the Show preview button
 * Provide an Edit summary
 * Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
 * Take a look at Consensus of standards
 * Create a User page
 * Be bold
 * Ignore all rules

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the  link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alf 09:22, 29 August 2005 (UTC).

Hi. You can sign comments on talk pages by adding ~. This makes them easier to follow as you can see who said what. I find the debate on TGN1412 interesting - yesterday it was the top story on BBC News but they hadn't picked up it was a monoclonal antibody. I've been told by someone that ITV's 6 o'clock news knows that now. Mainstream media's science coverage can be poor but hopeful we can help in some small way. Secretlondon 20:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Danish property bubble
Hi Para82

You created the article Danish property bubble, I am of the belief that the current rise in Dansih real estate prices is not an Economic bubble but merely a pricing/market ajustement, as the housing market is moving from government regulated to an open market economy. You also do not state any sources in the article, and makes reference to "some" observers and "some" analyst.

For theese reasons I am considering putting it up for deletion unless I hear from you.

I also noticed you made a lot of Denmark related contributions, perhaps you would be interested in joining the WikiProject Denmark, aslo if you have any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page

regards and happy editing Mads Angelbo 18:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Hi Para82

 * Thanks for your reply on my talk page, first thing first, it is good practice on wikipedia to sign your contributions with four(4) tilde(~), that automatically inserts your username, the date and time. That will makeit easier for people to see who posted what. It is also a good thing to start new sections at the bottom of the talk page.

 * Regarding the article Danish property bubble there is a problem that the name implies there is a bubble. What I can see from danish news, makes me think that all this bubble talk is media hype. Danmarks Radio reported that Danmarks Nationalbank states there is no bubble [DR Penge link 1] and the same frome the association of Danish Real estate brokers[www.de.dk] see [DR Penge link 2]

 * My main concern is theese statesments from the article, as you also pints out. I will try at see if I can find any sources, that can be incorpareted into the article. otherwise I will probably remove them.

 * Some observers have also ...
 * many banks and analysts acknowledge ...
 * This has led some observers to speculate that ...
 * Some have warned that the ...
 * Many real estate agents have ...

 * Keep up the good work and te best to you and happy editing. Mads Angelbo 18:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Danish property bubble
I have added a "" template to the article Danish property bubble, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Valentinian T / C 20:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

There is, and has most definitely been a Danish property bubble which has finally burst. In some sectors of the Copenhagen property market, prices are 30 to 40 percent off their 2006 peaks. Areas particularly effected are new-builds in the Copenhagen docklands. But no sector of the market is immune. Depending on the tax regime chosen Danish real estate companies are obliged to file valuations of their asset base, so the information is easily available. Graphs are also published weekly in popular Sunday business papers. I am unfamiliar with Wikpedia process and procedure but facts are facts. I would counter propose deletion and allow an important article to develop with properly documented references.

Amoungst the important themes that would develop are insights into a unique bonds based mortgage system, the effects of decades of state intervention in the property sector, high rates of personal taxation, uniquely discriminatory legislation in the property sector against other EU nationals and the unifying economic patterns of a global phenomena of asset inflation accross very different national economic systems.

Image:Dancepuppets.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dancepuppets.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Core desat 02:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Cosy Bar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 23:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Jailhouse (Copenhagen bar), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 18:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk:The Prestige (film)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Alientraveller 20:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Please read the talk page guidelines. I think you are better off discussing the film's finer points somewhere like the Internet Movie Database.  It is not realistic to delve into details of such a complicated plot beyond what is easily apparent. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

The Prestige (film)
Please refrain from deleting content from The Prestige (film). Plot summaries are not considered OR, and can be found on almost every film page on Wikipedia. Heliomance 11:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

 * The problem with your edit to the discussion page is that the talk page of an article is not the place to go in-depth about the plot. The reason a plot summary is not OR is because it can be very easily verified by anyone going to see the film - the film itself is the source. Also, when writing comments on talk pages, please sign them by adding four tildes (~) after your comment. Heliomance 11:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Ai ai ai. Sorry for biting you. As a general rule, it's not a good idea to do a major edit unless you're very sure you know what you're doing. Also, cutting out sections of a page to make your point is frowned upon. I possibly shouldn't have deleted the talk page entry, but the plot summary on the main article should definitely stay. However, I'm not sure what you hope to gain by the talk page entry - the purpose of the talk page is to discuss improvements to the article, and anything that came out of your entry would almost certainly be OR, and so ineligable for inclusion in the article. Heliomance 11:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I put up another reply to you after that comment, if you didn't notice. Yes, having OR on the discussion page is not inherently bad. But as the point of the discussion page is to improve the article, an entry that cannot result in any additions to the article that are not OR is pointless. As for deleting other entries on the talk page, please don't. I refer you again to WP:POINT. Heliomance 12:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Put it down to the fact that Wikipedia editors are, first and foremost, human. I have to admit that the main reason I deleted your edit is that I was following the precedent of the other editor. My apologies. Heliomance 12:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 11:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mogambo Guru
I have nominated Mogambo Guru, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mogambo Guru. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 00:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mogambo Guru

The article Mogambo Guru has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable "character" or pseudonym used by a non-notable writer.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Appendix H
Hello Para82,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Appendix H for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 02:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Double Tools Front Box.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Double Tools Front Box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Para82


text:
Clive, Shropshire

Clive is a village and civil parish in Shropshire, England, United Kingdom.

Clive is situated around the west side of Grinshill Hill. Grinshill sandstone, from the nearby quarry at Grinshill is used throughout the village for building material from walls and houses to the village church.

The English Restoration dramatist William Wycherley was born at Clive.

Road
Clive is situated just off the A49, and the B5476.

Rail
The village is served by Yorton railway station, located on the Welsh Marches Line between Shrewsbury and Wem. The majority of services are between Shrewsbury and Crewe, operated by Transport for Wales, as well as some additional services to Manchester Piccadilly, Hereford, Cardiff Central, Swansea and Carmarthen.

Bus
The village is served by the 511 bus route, operated by Arriva Midlands North, which runs between Shrewsbury and Whitchurch via Wem. Some services terminate in Wem and do not continue to Whitchurch.

Community life and local services
In the centre of the village is All Saints church which holds regular services. The vicar is Paul Cawthorne.

Clive Church of England primary school is situated halfway up Grinshill Hill.

The village is often used by the local Hunt, The North Shropshire Foxhounds, who from time to time there hold meets around the village.

It has a monthly news letter with input from the local community.

Regular evening classes, from computing to weaving, are held in the village hall, as well as the Post office, which is open weekly on Monday and Wednesday.

The village is served by a mechanics, a car dealership, a doctors' surgery, a hairdressers, and a number of small businesses, such as decorators and electricians, are based in and around the village.

Local governance
The parish council has nine members, and is chaired by Councillor Peter Walters.

The village is located in the Shawbury ward of Shropshire Council. This has been represented by Simon Jones (Conservative) since 2009.

title: Clive, Shropshire


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian National Congress - IT Cell

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by TheCoffee, Zscout370 as recreation of previously deleted content. Tito xd 05:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Indian National Congress - IT Cell
This page has been Vfded before with a consensus to delete. Non-notable department of a notable organisation Botsie 09:23, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, department of a notable organisation. Kappa 10:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * But is the department notable enough to deserve an article for itself? Seems to be just vanity by an officer of the org and the author of Rivaji. If the article was anything beyond a list of office bearers, I'd say merge with Indian National Congress, but the way it is I don't see any value in it. --Botsie 10:47, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually I will withdraw my vote. Kappa 16:47, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that the Congress Party of India is definitely notable; but this article is on the "IT Cell" within it, and notability is not established. It is simply a series of names. Sliggy 12:17, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - has been deleted before and the information in the re-created article is the same as in the old one Vino s 12:50, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a politically biased nomination. The nominator is Indian, but he calls the governing party of India "non-notable".  Osomec 13:53, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. A close perusal of the article will make clear that this nomination does not refer to Congress Party (which of course must be kept), but is about an affiliated/subsidiary organisation. Sliggy 14:11, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. I voted Congress if you must know. However, the article has failed to establish notability for it's IT Cell. --Botsie 09:21, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete --Quasipalm 16:18, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sliggy, i.a. I thought if this has already been vfd, it can be speedily deleted again. Dottore So 17:15, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Jachin 22:14, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:TITROTU

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:
 * Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
 * Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
 * Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
 * Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
 * Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
 * Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
 * Use the Show preview button
 * Provide an Edit summary
 * Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
 * Take a look at Consensus of standards
 * Create a User page
 * Be bold
 * Ignore all rules

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the  link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alf 09:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC).

Newgrounds
You`re doing a pretty good job in cleaning up the Newgrounds article, so I`m just here to thank you and make 2 sugestions: first, as I explain in the talk page, Tom Fulp claims to have created the 1rst portal, I really think we should link to that or put forward the claim; second, we really need to clean up the 2nd part of the article with the timeline, it`s just too big and has too many "irrelevant" information for an encyclopedia, so I recomend we discuss (in the talk page) what should be kept and what should be taken away. What do you think?

Concerning Newgrounds again, there have a lot of additions to the "failed crews" list, but I haven't heard of half the names there. Think we should delete some of them?--Vertigo200 19:14, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Lindsay Lohan
Nice catch on the Vanity Fair link, thank you :) Radio  Kirk   talk to me  17:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Knox2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Knox2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Carnildo or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Marotattoo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Marotattoo.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 13:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tomfulp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tomfulp.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 02:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Strawberryclock.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Strawberryclock.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 08:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Supersonicfighters.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Supersonicfighters.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Thue | talk 20:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros. Brawl images
Hello there! Could you add, for every image you have uploaded, the URL to the page from where you picked it? Not a generic (www.ign.com) one, but the real so that any wikipedian can click on the link and go straight to the gallery? The link should go in the image page. Thanks! -- ReyBrujo 03:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Your image
You mention on the image Image:Titrotu big.gif please ask permission to use it. You have the public domain licensing tag on it though. So, anyone can take it without your permission and use it elsewhere. I recommend changing your tag. -- Thorpe | talk 13:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

mario image
yes i know but cant you create a MUCH BETTER image then that? something not so ugly and stupid? Touth 03:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Warioland2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Warioland2.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Thunderbrand 19:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Foamy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Foamy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ssbbrawl7.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ssbbrawl7.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hbdragon88 04:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Newstarfox.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Newstarfox.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Wii Play
There is a better box art at Image:Wii Play.jpg. TJ Spyke 06:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Narutods.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Narutods.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sonicnext8.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sonicnext8.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Poke-wii.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Poke-wii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Poke-wii2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Poke-wii2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kirby64.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kirby64.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Carlosonstage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carlosonstage.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 19:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Custom-robo-ds.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Custom-robo-ds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NarutoKonohaSpirits.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:NarutoKonohaSpirits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Naruto-wii-logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Naruto-wii-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NarutoVolume4.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:NarutoVolume4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ssbbrawl1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ssbbrawl1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn 15:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ssbbrawl1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ssbbrawl1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nightsss.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nightsss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dragonball-gba.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dragonball-gba.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 04:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Narutonc3cover.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Narutonc3cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 18:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sonicrushadventure.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sonicrushadventure.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Banjologo1.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Banjologo1.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Banjologo2.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Banjologo2.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Banjologo3.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Banjologo3.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Banjologo4.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Banjologo4.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Narutomoviedub.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Narutomoviedub.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Narutoova2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Narutoova2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Re-claire.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Re-claire.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chef dead.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chef dead.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. KipSmithers T/ C 22:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nanostray2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nanostray2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Earthworm-psp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Earthworm-psp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Muhammad.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Muhammad.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Celebrity deathmatch logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Celebrity deathmatch logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Esrever (klaT) 03:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ssbbrawl3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ssbbrawl3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Megamanlegends1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Megamanlegends1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PokémonMysteryDungeon2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PokémonMysteryDungeon2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 01:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Raymanarena.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Raymanarena.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ssbbrawl3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ssbbrawl3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Jackass_number_two.jpg
I have tagged Image:Jackass_number_two.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Knuckles-sinbad.jpg)
You've uploaded File:Knuckles-sinbad.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Knuckles-sinbad.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Knuckles-sinbad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Titrotu big.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Titrotu big.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:52, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Chef dead.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chef dead.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Celebrity deathmatch logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Celebrity deathmatch logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:TITROTU


text:
Hook Island

Hook Island is one of the Whitsunday Islands off the coast of the Australian state of Queensland. The island is almost uninhabited, quite rugged and almost completely contained within a section of the Whitsunday Islands National Park. The island has two prominent geographical features on the southern side of Hook Island; the Nara and Macona inlets, two fjord-like recesses that are used as anchorages for the Whitsunday tourist fleet. The island's northern coast is noted for its colourful underwater coral growths, to which snorkelling and diving enthusiasts are attracted.

In 1964, photos were taken at the islands which circulated globally after what was believed to be some kind of sea monster was visible. The best known of the Hook Island Sea Monster photos is familiar to many (the two or three others are less familiar). It features a gigantic, tadpole-like monster, supposedly encountered in Stonehaven Bay, Hook Island, Queensland, by Robert Le Serrec and his family and a friend during December 1964.

On 12 February 2008 a yacht ran aground at Cape Cove. The yacht became wedged on dangerous rocks requiring the rescue of 37 people by helicopter. The incident was Australia's largest helicopter rescue operation from a vessel. At least two people have died from irukandji jellyfish stings while snorkeling off Hook Island.

Some of the oldest archaeological sites ever found in Eastern Australia are the caves and midden of the Ngaro People on Hook Island. A site at Nara Inlet is the oldest indication of Aboriginal occupation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

Hook Island Wilderness Resort
The only habitation on Hook Island is the Hook Island Wilderness Resort which formerly offered the most affordable on-land accommodation in the Whitsunday group before its closure. The resort ceased operating in February 2013. The modest and now dilapidated buildings are only occupied by permanent caretaking and security staff and visitors are only permitted on the beach as far as the high water mark.

Hook Island Underwater Observatory
Constructed in 1966, the Hook Island Underwater Observatory provided an additional tourist attraction to the island. It was closed 2010 following an assessment that found the submarine viewing chamber had insufficient ventilation. Since its closure it fell into disrepair and has since been completely removed and recycled.

title: Hook Island


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilsan tjiawi

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate wasSpeedily deleted. Attack page. --03:54, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Wilsan tjiawi
The article claims that he starred in more than 100 movies. No movie-related Google hits though. It seems that this page is a joke. Sietse 09:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Delete - NN, I even tried variations of Wilsan/Wilson/Willson just in case :) --inks 09:28, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - NN. --Bhadani 15:13, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete probably a hoax. Dottore So 17:13, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - sounds like a hoax. Anyone put the permutations through IMDB? Rob Church Talk 19:46, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Jachin 22:13, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above. Amren (talk)  23:57, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No relevant Google hits. Cnwb 00:14, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hell yeah, let's delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.5.236 (talk • contribs) 07:05, 31 August 2005 UTC
 * Delete. It's a hoax created by naughty people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.5.236 (talk • contribs) 07:08, 31 August 2005 UTC

contribs) 07:40, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Both the above comments were by, who created the article in the first place. --khaosworks (talk •
 * Delete. Hell yeah, let's delete it.
 * Delete. Delete it already. same IP doesnt mean same person. either internet cafe or hiding behind proxy

I'm speedying this - "Wilsan Tjiawi" is a student at the Nanyang Technological University, where the IP that created this article originates from. I am satisfied that it is an attack page, and will delete it immediately. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 03:54, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
José Guilherme Merquior

José Guilherme Merquior (April 22, 1941 – January 7, 1991) was a Brazilian diplomat, academic, writer, literary critic and philosopher.

Biography
He was a prolific writer, and member of the Academia Brasileira de Letras (the Brazilian Academy of Letters). He had a doctorate in sociology from the London School of Economics, which was directed by Ernest Gellner. Merquior also studied under Claude Lévi-Strauss (whose ideas Merquior would largely repudiate in From Prague to Paris), and took guidance from the likes of Raymond Aron, Harry Levin, and Arnaldo Momigliano. He published books written directly in French, English, Italian, and his native Portuguese.

Merquior divided his published works in two segments. In one the bulk was criticism per se; in the other the emphasis was the history of ideas, or more specific investigations like the highly esteemed study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Max Weber. Two of his books, Foucault (1985), an often scathing critique of Michel Foucault for the Fontana Modern Masters series, and Western Marxism (1986), were described as "minor classics" by Catholic scholar (and later, white nationalist) Gregory R. Johnson.

Merquior was a major supporter of the Fernando Collor de Mello government and wrote many of Collor's public speeches. He died of cancer in January 1991, before Collor's downfall in 1992.

Books

 * Published in Portuguese

 * 1963: Poesia do Brasil, (antologia com Manuel Bandeira)
 * 1965: Razão do Poema
 * 1969: Arte e Sociedade em Marcuse, Adorno e Benjamin
 * 1972: A astúcia da mímese
 * 1972: Saudades do Carnaval
 * 1974: Formalismo e tradição moderna
 * 1975: O estruturalismo dos pobres e outras questões
 * 1975: A estética de Lévi-Strauss
 * 1976: Verso e universo de Drummond
 * 1977: De Anchieta a Euclides
 * 1980: O fantasma romântico e outros ensaios
 * 1981: As idéias e as formas
 * 1982: A natureza do processo
 * 1983: O argumento liberal
 * 1983: O elixir do Apocalipse
 * 1985: Michel Foucault ou O niilismo da cátedra
 * 1987: O marxismo ocidental
 * 1990: Crítica
 * 1990: Rousseau e Weber: dois estudos sobre a teoria da legitimidade
 * 1991: De Praga a Paris: uma crítica do estruturalismo e do pensamento pós-estruturalista
 * 1991: O liberalismo, antigo e moderno
 * 1997: O véu e a máscara

 * Published in English

 * 1979: The veil and the mask: Essays on culture and ideology
 * 1980: Rousseau and Weber: Two studies in the theory of legitimacy
 * 1985: Foucault (Merquior book)
 * 1987: From Prague to Paris: A Critique of Structuralist and Post-Structuralist Thought
 * 1991: Western Marxism
 * 1991: Liberalism, Old and New
 * 1991: Foucault

 * Published in French

 * 1986: Foucault ou le nihilisme de la chaire

 * Published in Spanish

 * 1996 Liberalismo Viejo y Nuevo
 * 2005 El Comportamiento de Las Musas

 * In memoriam

 * 1996 Liberalism in Modern Times - Essays in Honour of José G. Merquior. Edited by Ernest Gellner and César Cansino

title: José Guilherme Merquior


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCHNAPPPI

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August ☎ 01:35, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

SCHNAPPPI
I'm not sure what this is about, but if it's what it purports to be, then this would surely be a copyvio anyway. Bovlb 09:27:24, 2005-08-29 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-encyclopedic and a copyvio. — J I P | Talk 09:35, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Schnappi surely is notable (hence the correct entry). The girl was performing on the British Sunday morning program "Smile" yesterday and the song hit the charts in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany already and is quite popular with the kids. Still, these lyrics are copyvio to boot and there's no reason to list them as such because we don't need a rewrite. - Mgm|(talk) 09:41, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio as we already have a correctly titled article. This song has proved to be very popular around the world. It is the first top 10 hit in Australia sung in German since 99 Luftballoons by Nena and that had an English version. Capitalistroadster 10:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete article history and redirect to Schnappi. Martg76 13:40, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Jachin 22:13, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Copyvio. Amren (talk) 23:57, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless an English, uncopyvio version is written. Cnwb 00:15, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, see Schnappi. Andrew pmk | Talk 00:56, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Schnappi; this version up for deletion contains the whole songtext; do you want it translated (please no)? btw: how I hate this song, it was played day in day out everywhere in Germany, so that after a while spent in malls or shops, you had the impression that little crocodiles were beginning to grow inside your head...Lectonar 09:27, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete with little crocodiles, no need to redirect every misspelling, especially all-uppercase ones. Barno 23:54, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * merge with David Hasselhoff errr...  rework and expand as desperate warning to the rest of the world that there exists something apparently worse than Barney & Friends or Tinky-Winky Redirect as per above Roodog2k 00:31, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Donkey's Tail

Donkey's Tail (Ослиный хвост, Romanized: Osliniy khvost) was a Russian artistic group created from the most radical members of the Jack of Diamonds group. The group included such painters as: Mikhail Larionov (inventor of the name), Natalia Goncharova, Kazimir Malevich, Marc Chagall, and Aleksandr Shevchenko. The group, according to Gino Severini in his autobiography, was Futurist; it is known that, even if they were not, they were certainly influenced by the Cubo-Futurism movement. The only exhibition of the group took place in Moscow in 1912 (notable for being the start of Malevich's entry into his Cubo-Futurist phase), and in 1913, the group fell apart.

title: Donkey's Tail