text:
User talk:Ajdebre

Copyright block
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Theleftorium (talk) 11:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * After taking a look at the history of your talk page, I found even more warnings, dating back to as far as March 2006. See for example and . I have therefore extended your block to indefinite. You are still allowed the contest the block at any time. Theleftorium (talk) 14:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Vojvoda Bogut i Djurdje Bogutovic
Pozdrav. Interesuje me gdje si pronasao podatke o Vojvodi Bogutu i Djurdju Bogutovicu? Ja sam inace autor teksta o Jablangradu na srpskoj wikipediji.--TheMiner (talk) 13:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

No
Ajdebre, this is awful to see. I didn't saw this with copyright problems. Your hundreds of articles are invaluable contribution to wikipedia. I hope that this will not be indef. -- Tadijaspeaks 20:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, he was already given an indefinite block after the admin realised he had prior accusations of copyright violations. Shame though, the loss of another key editor to Wikipedia. Yet, I am truly surprised no one has figured out that Ajdebre is using sockpuppets, or at least had used them till a few days ago. --Kilibarda (talk) 15:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia
Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 17:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kale-rezervoar-za-vodu.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kale-rezervoar-za-vodu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Serbia 2
Template:Serbia 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 22:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 2008 Čačak earthquake for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008 Čačak earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2008 Čačak earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a  message on my talk page. 17:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Srbac BiH.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Srbac BiH.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 14:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Serbian historical regions
Template:Serbian historical regions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ivan Desnica

The article Ivan Desnica has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Can't verify person's existence via Google search, books, scholar

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Serbs in Bulgaria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serbs in Bulgaria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Serbs in Bulgaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kostja (talk) 10:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Independent Kosovo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Independent Kosovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Independent Kosovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Independent Kosovo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Independent Kosovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Independent Kosovo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Slavic deity
Template:Infobox Slavic deity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Slavic deity
Template:Infobox Slavic deity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 04:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pljeskavica

The article Pljeskavica has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Sadly, this article does not cite any references, and so clearly fails WP:GNG requirement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jokino Vrelo

A tag has been placed on Jokino Vrelo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Syrianization

The article Syrianization has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * No content or sources in almost a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Vrhnje listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vrhnje. Since you had some involvement with the Vrhnje redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:National Tourism Organization of Serbia (logo).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:National Tourism Organization of Serbia (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jugoslovenima for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jugoslovenima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jugoslovenima until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 06:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina, Ajdebre!

Wikipedia editor Krishna Chaitanya Velaga just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The article will be considered for deletion."

To reply, leave a comment on Krishna Chaitanya Velaga's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Serbian titles has been nominated for discussion
Category:Serbian titles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  01:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Grb Crnojev.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Grb Crnojev.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Organ theft in Kosovo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Organ theft in Kosovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Organ theft in Kosovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Openlydialectic (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Serbian Wars
Template:Serbian Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Regions of Republika Srpska
Template:Regions of Republika Srpska has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Valjevoloc.png

The file File:Valjevoloc.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Natali Thanou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natali Thanou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Natali Thanou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Serbian flag takovo.png

The file File:Serbian flag takovo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

"Svevlad" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Svevlad. Since you had some involvement with the Svevlad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  00:34, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

"Kostolac culture" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kostolac culture. Since you had some involvement with the Kostolac culture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  - speednat (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Natali Thanou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natali Thanou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Natali Thanou& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Welcome to RS.jpg

The file File:Welcome to RS.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Serbian architecture outside Serbia

A tag has been placed on Category:Serbian architecture outside Serbia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
 * For the record, see Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_16. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Serbo-Croatian Friendship

The article Serbo-Croatian Friendship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Unuseful disambiguation page, neither targets are/were ever referred to using this term."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Metropolitan areas of Serbia has been nominated for merging
Category:Metropolitan areas of Serbia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 06:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ajdebre


text:
Abramtsevo

Abramtsevo (Абрамцево) is the name of several rural localities in Russia:
 * Abramtsevo (selo), Dmitrovsky District, Moscow Oblast, a selo in Sinkovskoye Rural Settlement of Dmitrovsky District in Moscow Oblast; 56.4°N, 37.23333°W
 * Abramtsevo (village), Dmitrovsky District, Moscow Oblast, a village in Sinkovskoye Rural Settlement of Dmitrovsky District in Moscow Oblast; 56.41667°N, 37.18333°W
 * Abramtsevo, Sergiyevo-Posadsky District, Moscow Oblast, a selo under the administrative jurisdiction of the Town of Khotkovo in Sergiyevo-Posadsky District of Moscow Oblast; 56.23333°N, 37.98333°W
 * Abramtsevo, Vologda Oblast, a village in Spassky Selsoviet of Vologodsky District in Vologda Oblast

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Abramtsevo


text:
Spanish landing helicopter dock Juan Carlos I

Juan Carlos I is a multi-purpose aircraft carrier-landing helicopter dock (LHD) in the Spanish Navy (Armada Española). Similar in role to many aircraft carriers, the amphibious landing ship has a ski jump for STOVL operations, and is equipped with the McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II attack aircraft. The vessel is named in honour of Juan Carlos I, the former king of Spain.

The vessel plays an important role in the fleet, as a platform that replaces the Newport-class tank landing ship tank landing ships SPANISH LANDING SHIP Hernán Cortés and SPANISH LANDING SHIP Pizarro for supporting the mobility of the Marines and the strategic transport of other ground forces, and acts as a platform for carrier-based aviation replacing the withdrawn aircraft carrier SPANISH AIRCRAFT CARRIER Príncipe de Asturias.

Design
The design for the Buque de Proyección Estratégica (Strategic Projection Vessel), as it was initially known, was approved in September 2003.

The vessel has a flight deck of 202 m, with a ski-jump ramp. The ship's flight deck has eight landing spots for Harrier, F-35 Lightning II or medium-sized helicopters, four spots for heavy helicopters of the CH-47 Chinook or V-22 Osprey size. The ship can carry either 30 helicopters or 10/12 McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II or Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II and 10/12 helicopters, using the light vehicles bay as an additional storage zone.

The ship uses diesel-electric propulsion, simultaneously connecting both diesels and the new technology gas turbine powerplant to a pair of azimuthal pods, for the first time in the Spanish Navy.

The complement of the ship is approximately 900 naval personnel, with equipment and support elements for 1,200 soldiers. Multi-functional garage and hangar space on two levels covers 6,000 m2, with capacity for 6,000 tonnes load on each level. A stern well deck measuring 69.3 by can accommodate four LCM-1E landing craft which can beach-deliver non-swimming ground vehicles like tanks and four RHIBs, or one Landing Craft Air Cushion plus Assault Amphibious Vehicles.

Construction
Construction of the 231 m, 27,000-tonne ship started in May 2005 simultaneously at the Navantia Shipyards in Ferrol, Galicia (with the cut of the first plate corresponding to Block 320) and in Fene, Galicia (with the cut of the first plate corresponding to Block 330). The ship, that supposes a service load of 3,100,000 hours of production and 775,000 hours of engineering, was launched 10 March 2008, and was commissioned 30 September 2010. The original budget was €360 million but the ship cost €462 million (US$600 million) in the end.

Australia
In June 2007, following a lengthy contest that pitted it against the similar but smaller French Mistral-class amphibious assault ship, the Australian government announced that it would build under licence two ships of the same design, known as the Canberra-class landing helicopter dock. Navantia was responsible for the ships' construction from the keel to the flight deck in Spain, after which the hulls were transported to Australia for completion by BAE Systems Australia. The first of these ships, HMAS Canberra (L02), was commissioned on 28 November 2014. The second ship, HMAS Adelaide (L01), was commissioned on 4 December 2015.

Russia
In September 2009, Russia invited Navantia to take part in a competition to supply the Russian Navy with a new generation of amphibious assault ships, competing against the French Mistral-class ships. In January 2011, Russia chose the Mistral proposal over the Spanish concept.

Turkey

Navantia provided design, technology transfer, equipment and technical assistance to Turkey's Sedef Shipyard for the design and production of TCG Anadolu, a modified Turkish derivative of the Juan Carlos class, classified as a "Light Aircraft Carrier" by Turkish Lloyd. It features local command and control systems; and the combat management system of the ship ADVENT is integrated by HAVELSAN. In December 2013, the Turkish Navy's amphibious assault ship program was estimated to cost €375 million (US$500 million), however the total was near US$650 million when the ship entered service.

Originally, the Turkish Navy wanted a slightly shorter flight deck without the forward ski-jump ramp, optimized for helicopter-only use. The navy later opted for a fully equipped flight deck with the ski-jump after deciding to purchase Lockheed Martin F-35B STOVL aircraft. Turkey was a Level 3 partner in the Joint Strike Fighter program and the Turkish Air Force was to get the F-35A CTOL version. On 17 July 2019, the US removed Turkey from the F-35 program for purchasing the Russian S-400 missile system.

The Turkish version is capable of operating up to 10 helicopters on deck in "light aircraft carrier" configuration. The final design's dimensions are: 232 m (length), 32 m (beam), 6.9 m (draught), and 58 m (height). Its displacement is 24,660 metric tons (in "light aircraft carrier" mission configuration) or 27,436 metric tons (in "amphibious landing ship" mission configuration). Its maximum speed is 21.5 kn (in "light aircraft carrier" configuration) or 29 kn (in "amphibious landing ship" configuration).

Its maximum is 9000 nmi when travelling at an economical speed. It has a 5,440 m2 flight deck and a 990 m2 aviation hangar which can accommodate either twelve medium-sized helicopters or eight CH-47F Chinook heavy-lift helicopters. When the aviation hangar and the light cargo garage are unified, up to 25 medium-sized helicopters can be carried, or up to twelve helicopters and twelve F-35 fighters. Six more helicopters can be hosted on the flight deck.

The ship has a 1,880 m2 light cargo garage for TEU containers and 27 Amphibious Assault Vehicles (AAV); a 1,165 m2 dock which can host four Landing Craft Mechanized (LCM) or two Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC), or two Landing Craft Vehicle Personnel (LCVP); and a 1,410 m2 garage for heavy loads, which can host 29 Main Battle Tanks (MBT), Amphibious Assault Vehicles and TEU containers. The crew consists of 261 personnel: 30 officers, 49 NCOs, 59 leading seamen and 123 ratings.

The final contract for the ship's construction was signed with the Navantia-Sedef consortium on 7 May 2015. While the commissioning of the ship was scheduled for 2021 in the beginning,  it entered service in 10 May 2023. The estimated cost according to the final specifications was $1 billion in 2015. Construction began on 30 April 2016 at the shipyard of Sedef Shipbuilding Inc. in Istanbul.

The construction of an identical sister ship, to be named TCG Trakya, is currently planned.


text:
Pelmanism

Pelmanism may refer to:
 * Pelmanism (system), a memory-training and personal development "system" popular in the first half of the twentieth century
 * Concentration (game), a memory-based card game also known as Pelmanism

title: Pelmanism


text: User talk:84.160.115.243

title: User talk:84.160.115.243