text:
Talk:Professor Frink

You do realize that wasn't canon, right?
Yesterday I added my favorite line ever spoken by a Simpson character that defines everything wrong with geeks designing for the masses with this paragraph:
 * In one of Treehouse of Horror (series), Lisa finds she created life from a tooth that fell out. This life grows rapidly and you see their evolution from cavemen to Lutherans to a futuristic race. Professor Frink's double in this parallel universe creates a de-bigulator which shrinks Lisa (their god) down to their size. When Lisa asks them to unshrink her he replies with: "Unshrink you?!? Why, that would require some sort of a re-bigulator, which is a concept so ridiculous it makes me want to laugh out loud and chortle, and... um... but not at you, oh holiest of gods, with the wrathfulness and the vengeance and the blood rain and the hey-hey-hey-it-hurts-me!"

Ironically, by the same logic a non-admin took it upon himself to remove this contribution with a simple "You do realize that wasn't canon, right?" (also read ["Pff... why would we want MORE information about this character??!?!?"]). If anyone can help me understand why this paragraph has no business what so ever in a user run internet based information site please let me know. Billy Nair 18:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Read WP:FICT and WP:NOT and you will find out. -- Scorpion0422 20:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Huh?
when a meteor is approaching Springfield in a Paul Bunyan portray What exactly does this mean? -DynSkeet (talk) 16:39, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

This is vandalism. It has been corrected.- Numbuh 3.14 (Dr. Green) 7:16, May 1, 2006 (UTC)

Actually, it wasn't vandalism, the metor was approaching in the episode when they ride a train to Delaware, whilst a hobo tells them stories. The metor was actually not dooming Springfield, it was headed toward an unnamed city, during the Paul Bunyon parody, which is what he probably wanted to say. Therequiembellishere 19:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Autodialer
..the device is preprogrammed with all of the telephone numbers of the residents of Springfield. This is incorrect. I have rewritten this segment accordingly. --^pirate 19:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Okey dokey. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 14:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Inspiration for his name
I think that Professor Frink is not named after John Frink. In this link you can clearly see that the name "John Frink" appears in a 1996 episode, yet the article on John Frink the writer says he joined The Simpsons in 2000. - JSmith60 04:28, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, that sounds like it should be re-verified. Burnside65 (talk) 22:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * John Frink was a friend of the writers long before he started working on the show. According to SNPP: "John Frink is a staff writer and producer for The Simpsons. The name is not a coincidence; the professor character was in fact named after him before he joined the staff; he was a friend of former writers Jay Kogen and Wallace Wolodarsky." Although I agree that it does need a proper source (I think it has been mentioned in the commentaries). -- Scorpion0422 14:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Glaben, glaven or glavin?
Is there any official confirmation of what one of Frink's favoured gibberish words actually is? I personally thought it was 'glaben', whereas several websites say 'glaven', and the article on here says 'glavin'. Anyone? Alexrushfear 17:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Glavin is correct.
 * According to subtitles in the UK, it's glaven. 86.170.145.158 (talk) 17:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Middle Initals
I. Q.? I haven't heard of that before, and Treehouse of Horror XIV gives his middle name as "Nerdlebaum." --Jnelson09 13:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Atheist
Religion in The Simpsons states that he's an atheist, and not Jewish. Is this correct?--Orthologist 17:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

 * I don't know much about this character but I do know enough about Jewish people to know that you can be both Jewish and an atheist. The word Jewish can refer to both the race and the religion collectively and separately.  While in Japan I talked to a couple guys from Israel that tried to explain the differences.  They also said something about a political party's persuasion but I don't remember much about that aspect of the term.  Billy Nair 20:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

sugestions to series continuity
In the section designated 'personal life' one or more of the writers seems to have the mistaken immpession that all simpsons episodes corespond exactly to each other.

Personally I think that the detailed rationailizations for discontinuity should be removed beacause as we all know, many of the things in simpsons episodes do not line up exactly, nor do the writers of the Simpsons attempt to make it so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.112.223 (talk) 09:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jonathon Frink Sr.jpg
Image:Jonathon Frink Sr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Frink.gif
Image:Frink.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Possible source
Anyone have this book? It might be useful. From what I can tell from previews, it definitely mentions Frink, but I'm not sure if it goes into any in-depth discussions. Zagalejo^^^ 04:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I actually found it on Google Books earlier: . It will definitely be useful. Theleftorium (talk) 08:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

face of season 16
Could someone update this page to reflect his appearance on the cover of season 16 dvd box set? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.227.5 (talk) 06:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's relevant for his character page. It has nothing to do with the character. C T F 8 3 !  00:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Professor Frink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012021428/http://simpsons.ugo.com/?cur=frink to http://simpsons.ugo.com/?cur=frink

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Season 33 Episode 4 Homage
In deference to the episode (s33, e04) where Frink directs the Simpsons to his Wiki page, I'd very much like it if we- the Simpsons community might be able to reflect some of the Simpsons universe in our own. By which, I mean - It would be great if we could make at least part of the wiki page for Frink resemble the one from that episode.

The page from the episode in question has 3 main headers, which take up a whole line each. Each one reads: "Smartest Man Ever, Five Months Without A Wedgie, Can Pretty Much Swim." Beneath each header is unreadable text and on the far right is a picture that runs the full length of the page (but only about 1/5th of the width) of Professor Frink in his lab coat, blue bow tie on and both hands at his sides. I would be very proud of us if we were able to make this happen. 2001:8003:6416:3B00:B021:DF5C:497E:8641 (talk) 19:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Professor Frink


text:
User talk:Afn

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 16:39, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hola/Hello
Desde Argentina me comunico contigo amigo Afn. También a mí me interesa la cuántica. Pero me comunico contigo (y perdona que lo haga en spanish) porque un vecino tuyo -de Donegal-: Georges McFinnigan se ha peleado con algunos de los de la Wikipedia en español. Georges McFinnigan ha sido inducido a retirarse de la Wikipedia en español y parece que se va de la misma. Si tú le conoces dile que se quede en la Wikipedia en español ya que muchos le consideramos un amigo. También te considero -a priori- un amigo, y más si logras convencer a tu compatriota Georges mcFinnigan. Un GRAN saludo. --200.125.105.191 06:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Go Raibh Maith Agat
Go raibh maith agat as ucht do leide ar na Lambeg Drums.--PeadarMaguidhir 07:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Níl sé ach litir amháin! Afn 15:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

GAA
Hey, thanks. p.s > Hard luck on Donegal in the Nicky Rackard, Derry belong in the Christy Ring, i was shouting for ye.Caismirt

Thanks for your condolences. I think we belong in the Nicky Rackard! Afn 16:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Help Needed
Hi i've just about finished my update to Infobox GAA player ,if you could please have a look at it and make a few suggestions that would be most helpful it can be found in my sandbox here user:Gnevin/sandbox1, Thanks (Gnevin 20:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC))

 * What brower did you use too look at it? Did you check out user:Gnevin/sandbox2 for the full thing? Thanks again. (Gnevin 18:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC))

hello
what part of donegal are you from Afn.--Qwertyuiopasdfgh vfen 12:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

You're asking a question there! Donegal town originally but Letterkenny for a while now. Afn 14:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

the letterkenny article is o.k. isn't it, please leave it there and don't delete the nightlife,media,retail,monument sections. --Qwertyuiopasdfgh vfen 15:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Some of this Information and a photograph are taken from Letterkenny Guide.com Why have they been copied without asking permission.

Glenveagh
Could you take a look at the question asked at Talk:Glenveagh? Ekko 16:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Afn


text:
Through the Looking Glass (Siouxsie and the Banshees album)

Through the Looking Glass is the eighth studio album by English rock band Siouxsie and the Banshees. The album is a collection of cover versions. It was co-produced with Mike Hedges and released in March 1987 on Polydor. Through the Looking Glass was preceded by the single "This Wheel's on Fire". It was the second and final album recorded with guitarist John Valentine Carruthers. Some of their cover songs were praised by the original artists themselves.

History
The title of the record, Through the Looking Glass, referred to Lewis Carroll's book of the same name. The band had already been inspired by Carroll's work when naming their label, Wonderland, which was derived from Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. The record was also an ode to David Bowie's Pin Ups, a covers album recorded in the early 1970s. After spending more than a year working on 1986's Tinderbox, the Banshees wanted spontaneity, and quickly returned to the studio after the tour, to record their own covers album. It was a project they had been considering since recording a version of the Beatles's "Dear Prudence" in 1983.

For the Through the Looking Glass sessions, which took place in September and October 1986, they chose material mainly dating from the first half of the 1970s, from an era preceding the 1976 formation of their band. Most of the songs were from artists who had influenced them: Roxy Music, John Cale, Iggy Pop, the Doors and Kraftwerk. Producer Mike Hedges, who hadn't worked with them since 1984, was called back. The instrumentation was different; for this album, they hired other instrumentalists including a brass section and a harpist. Musician Martin McCarrick, who would become an official member of the Banshees after this album, created string arrangements for several tracks.

The band's version of Iggy Pop song "The Passenger" featured brass arrangements played by Pete Thoms and Luke Tunney, who had already worked with Siouxsie and Budgie on the Creatures' single "Right Now".

Release
Through the Looking Glass was released on 2 March 1987 on Polydor. A few weeks after, Bowie contacted them to be the special guests at two shows on his Glass Spider Tour in Anaheim.

The album was reissued on CD with bonus tracks in October 2014.

A 180g vinyl reissue of the album, remastered from the original ¼” tapes and cut half-speed at Abbey Road Studios by Miles Showell, was released in August 2018.

Reception and legacy
Ralf Hütter of Kraftwerk lauded the version of "Hall of Mirrors" and stated: "In general, we consider cover versions as an appreciation of our work. The version of 'Hall of Mirrors' by Siouxsie and the Banshees is extraordinary". Iggy Pop said of their cover of "The Passenger": "That's good. She sings it well and she threw a little note in when she sings it, that I wish I had thought of. It kind of improves it... The horn thing is good".

In their contemporary review, the Los Angeles Times stated: "These songs are superbly rearranged, retaining enough of what was special about the originals and adding just the right new twists." Critic Terry Atkinson wrote about their cover of "Strange Fruit": "Only someone as brash as Siouxsie Sioux would re-record Lewis Allan's "Strange Fruit," a song so strongly identified with Billie Holiday. And only someone as serious and sensitive could bring it off like this. A solemn string section behind the vocals and—best of all—a bridge of New Orleans funeral-march jazz enhance Siouxsie's evocative interpretation". Atkinson then concluded emphasising, "Such inventive touches permeate a great album". Sounds praised the rendition of "Trust in Me" as "quite astonishing. Whereas once it was about a python getting ready to crush a little boy to death, now it's a harp-laden lullaby of rampant, swirling eroticism".

In a retrospective review, AllMusic said: "The inspired range of covers reaches from glam-era landmarks (Roxy Music's 'Sea Breezes', John Cale's 'Gun') to Billie Holiday's sorrowful touchstone 'Strange Fruit' to, in one of the best such efforts ever (and a year before Hal Willner's Stay Awake project), a Disney classic—namely the slinky 'Trust in Me', originally from The Jungle Book and given a spare, mostly-Budgie backing that could almost be a sparkling Creatures outtake".

Mojo included their version of "Strange Fruit" on the 2007 CD Music Is Love: 15 Tracks That Changed the World Recovered By.... Writing in the 2004 edition of The Rolling Stone Album Guide,

Mark Coleman and Mac Randall gave Through the Looking Glass a rating of 2.5 stars out of five, saying that it contains "overpolished covers of the group's obvious influences". In an article about "Records Turning 30 Years Old in 2017", Paste included it in their top fifteen saying that it was, "an eclectic and adventurous album of Siouxsie-fied takes on a diverse collection of songs", with "interesting and engaging choices". Journalist Will Hodge concluded: "this album is a prime example of the value of artistic merit not being accurately measured by mainstream successes".

Personnel

 * Siouxsie and the Banshees
 * Siouxsie Sioux - vocals
 * Steven Severin - electric bass and keyboards
 * Budgie - drums and percussion
 * John Valentine Carruthers - guitars and keyboards

 * Additional personnel
 * Martin McCarrick - cello, keyboards, string arrangements
 * Jocelyn Pook - viola
 * Gini Ball - violin
 * Pete Thoms - trombone
 * Luke Tunney - trumpet
 * Martin Dobson - saxophone
 * Julie Aliss - harp
 * Mike Hedges - producer, engineer


text:
Just Cause (film)

Just Cause is a 1995 American crime thriller film directed by Arne Glimcher and starring Sean Connery and Laurence Fishburne. It is based on John Katzenbach's novel of the same name.

Plot
Paul Armstrong, a liberal Harvard professor and former lawyer opposed to capital punishment, is persuaded by an elderly woman to go to Florida to investigate the conviction of her grandson Bobby Earl Ferguson for murder. Ferguson, a former Cornell University student, was convicted of raping and brutally murdering a young white girl named Joanie Shriver eight years prior. Ferguson tells Armstrong that he was physically and psychologically tortured by two police detectives to get a forced confession, but firmly states he is innocent. Armstrong, believing in his innocence, must save him from being executed in the electric chair. As Armstrong digs deeper into the case, he discovers that Tanny Brown, the chief detective on the case, did indeed coerce Ferguson's confession.

Ferguson tells the professor that the murder was actually committed by Blair Sullivan, a serial killer awaiting execution. According to Ferguson, Sullivan constantly taunts him about his conviction for the crime. Sullivan, through the use of Biblical cryptic clues, later reveals the location of the knife used to kill the girl. Armstrong and Brown go to the place, and Armstrong asks Brown to retrieve the knife as Brown's the actual police officer. Brown tries to threaten Armstrong into abandoning the investigation. Armstrong then discovers why Brown is so passionate about getting Ferguson convicted: the murdered girl was Brown's daughter's best friend. With a new testimony and with the murder weapon at hand, Ferguson gets a re-trial and is acquitted and thereafter freed from prison. Subsequently, the governor authorizes Sullivan's execution.

Armstrong receives a call from Sullivan, who says he has a final clue to share, but first wants Armstrong to visit Sullivan's parents and tell them he said goodbye. Arriving at the house, Armstrong sees various religious items before finding their butchered, decaying bodies. Back at the prison, Sullivan gloats that he and Ferguson struck a deal: Ferguson would kill Sullivan's parents in exchange for freedom, while Sullivan would claim responsibility for the girl's murder, which Ferguson did in fact commit. Armstrong asks why he was needed for their scheme, and Sullivan replies that was "Bobby Earl's call", meaning that Armstrong would be much more believable in establishing the verdicts than either Ferguson or Sullivan. Armstrong, in his anger at being manipulated, lies to Sullivan and tells him his parents were alive and that they "forgive him." Sullivan becomes enraged. He is forcibly taken by the guards to the electric chair, where he is executed.

Armstrong suspects that Ferguson has kidnapped his wife and daughter, and Armstrong and Brown pursue him. They learn Ferguson's motive is a desire for revenge on Armstrong's wife Laurie; she was the prosecutor against him in a previous kidnapping case which, while ultimately dropped due to lack of evidence, resulted in him being brutalized and castrated in jail when she had him remanded to make a name for herself, as well as the loss of his Cornell scholarship and educational prospects. Out in the swamps, Armstrong finds his wife and daughter in a small shack, where Ferguson appears. Ferguson's plans include raping and murdering Armstrong's wife and daughter and then disappearing. At a critical moment, Brown reappears (after seemingly being attacked and killed by Ferguson) and he and Armstrong join forces. Armstrong stabs Ferguson to death and his body is subsequently eaten by an alligator. Armstrong's family is thus saved.

Production
Sean Connery turned down the role of King Edward I in Braveheart in order to star in this film. Originally, Will Smith was in talks to take on the role of Bobby Earl Ferguson. Connery and director Arne Glimcher were close friends, and Glimcher took on directing duties so that they could both work on the film together. Principal photography began on May 16, 1994, and took place in and around the state of Florida. Locations include Bonita Springs, Fort Denaud, Fort Myers, Gainesville, Miami Beach, as well as around Lee and Collier counties. Filming also included Harvard Square in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Production wrapped on August 2, 1994, and also marked the final theatrical film for Hope Lange.

Release
Just Cause was released on February 17, 1995, in 2,052 theatres. It opened at number 2 at the US box office grossing $10.6 million in its opening weekend. It remained at number 2 for its second week, grossing $6.6 million. The film went on to gross $36.8 million in the United States and Canada and $63 million worldwide.

Reception
Unlike Glimcher's previous film, The Mambo Kings, Just Cause received mostly negative reviews, with a "Rotten" 26% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 31 reviews. The site's consensus states; "Just Cause you round up a phenomenal cast, that doesn't mean you have everything you need for a solid legal thriller – and this film is forgettable proof."

Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert both commented that the film's first half is quite good, particularly as a character study, but in its second half, it becomes buried in gratuitous plot twists before ending in a ludicrous showdown. However, Siskel ultimately recommended the film, while Ebert did not. Janet Maslin praised the performances of Laurence Fishburne and Ed Harris, but found the entire film is colored by director Arne Glimcher's inappropriately polished and antiseptic visual style. She summarized it as "a crime story so gritless that even the forensic photos of a stabbing victim look good." Lisa Schwarzbaum likewise praised Fishburne's performance and blamed the film's artistic failure on the direction, saying Glimcher consistently drained the story of its thrills with heavy-handedness. She gave the film a C−. Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale.

Television adaptation
In late November 2022, it was reported by Deadline Hollywood and other media outlets that Scarlett Johansson, who played Katie Armstrong in the film, had signed to star and executive produce an Amazon Prime Video limited series based on Just Cause from writer Christy Hall with a gender-flipped version of Matt Cowart known as Madison "Madi" Cowart as the main protagonist.

title: Just Cause (film)


text:
User talk:WORMFEST

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Francs2000 | Talk 16:41, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:WORMFEST


text: File:Ramones - Halfway to Sanity cover.jpg


text:
Category talk:Tony Awards

New Subcategories for awards
Starting to add some here, see Talk:Tony Award for more details. Beanbatch 16:42, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Tony Awards


text:
User:Charles Matthews/Morgan

This list from the book on Kant by this |Diane Morgan.

A
Jeremy Adler - Sylviane Agacinski - C. Aldred - H. Amelunken - Hubertus von Amelunxen - A. Ujica - K. Ansell Pearson - M. Axton - Marie Axton

B
Jean-Pierre Bayard - Oswald Bayer - Catherine Belsey - Daniel Beresniak - Tobern Olof Bergmann - M. Bloch - H. Blumenberg - Hans Blumenberg - H. Böhme - G. Böhme - E. L. Boullée - Jean-Louis Bruch - G. Büchner

C
Bruce Chatwin - Henry Corbin

D
Basil Davidson - M. Davis - K. Dean - B. Massumi - Brian Massumi - Giambattista della Porta - H. Demisch - D. Diderot - G. Dimitroff - Raphaël Dräi - B. Edelman - Eliane Escoubas - G. Festugière - Johann Bernhard Fischer von Erlach - H. Francfort - S. Giedion - Siegfried Giedion - Sigfried Giedion - D. Gordon - S. J. Gould - A. Goulyga - Jean-Joseph Goux - J. G. Hamann - Stefan Heym - J. D. Hunt - P. Willis - Catherine Ingraham - F. Jacob - Charles Jencks - E. Kantorowicz - A. Koyré - P. Lacoue-Labarthe - M. A. Laugier - K. A. Marling - W. Menninghaus - -Winfried Menninghaus -  W. J. Mitchell - J.-L. Nancy - Agrippa von Nettesheim - C. Norbert-Schulz - F. Novalis von Hardenberg - W. Oechslin - S. Orgel - Stephen Orgel - G. Parry - Daniel Payot - A. Philonenko - Alexis Philonenko - Quatremère de Quincy

R
A. Rabinbach - Anson Rabinbach - O. Reboul - Johann Wilhelm Ritter - Jacob Rogozinski - A. J. Roqué - E. Rose

S
A. Saint - R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz - Susan Shell - G. Simmel - J. Starobinski - Jean Starobinski - B. Stoker - Stephen Switzer - P. Tillich - J. Uexküll - B. Vaudeville - Anthony Vidler - Adrian von Butlaar - J. Wahl - A. Welchman - Wellmer - Mark Wigley - J. Wilson - J. J. Winckelmann - J. H. Zammito - John H. Zammito - S. Zizek

title: User:Charles Matthews/Morgan


text:
Scott Cohen (actor)

Scott Cohen is an American actor. He is known for his portrayal of Wolf in the 2000 NBC miniseries The 10th Kingdom, his performance as detective Steve Thomas in Perfect Murder, Perfect Town, his recurring role as Lorelai Gilmore's love interest Max Medina on the WB series Gilmore Girls, and his role as Josh in the indie romantic film Kissing Jessica Stein.

Career
In 1990, Cohen was offered a breakthrough role in Adrian Lyne's Jacob's Ladder. In the video game Ripper, he portrays protagonist Jake Quinlan. He appeared in the movie Gia with Angelina Jolie, as a parole officer in the Showtime original series Street Time with Rob Morrow, had a recurring role as Det. Harry Denby in the seventh season of NYPD Blue, and was featured in the 2005 NBC series Law & Order: Trial by Jury as Det. Chris Ravell.

In 2000 Cohen had a co-starring role as Wolf in the hit miniseries The 10th Kingdom, where he played a mythical character from a land of fairy tales. He starred opposite Kimberly Williams, John Larroquette, Dianne Wiest, Daniel Lapaine, Ed O'Neill, and Rutger Hauer. The miniseries won many awards, such as the 2000 Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Main Title Design.

Also in 2000 Cohen played Max Medina, in the hit TV series Gilmore Girls, as a teacher at Chilton high school where the main character's daughter went to school. Medina became the boyfriend of Lauren Graham's character, Lorelai, in season one and fiancé in season two.

In 2002–2003, he made some appearances on the game show Pyramid, hosted by Donny Osmond. He guest-starred in the premiere episode of the eighth season of Law & Order: Criminal Intent, playing the role of a city politician with a dark family secret and whose daughter is a drug addict involved with a drug dealer boyfriend killed mysteriously in the opening scene.

Cohen played Jack Woolf in the movie The Other Woman with Natalie Portman and Charlie Tahan. He starred in the British thriller Iron Cross. In the film he plays Ronnie, whose father, Joseph, is played by Roy Scheider. Cohen was on USA Network's drama series Necessary Roughness as the fixer, Nico.

Cohen had a role in The Carrie Diaries as Carrie's dad's old friend starting in Season 1 Episode 3. He gives Carrie her internship at his law firm in New York City, and Carrie dates his son. He also courts and eventually marries Larissa, Carrie's boss at Interview magazine.

Cohen starred opposite Hope Davis in the NBC drama Allegiance.

title: Scott Cohen (actor)


text:
Talk:The Mark on the Door

See [] for discussion about User FWDixon/Bob Finnan's link spamming and plagiarism.

More on the link spamming and commercial advertising. Example http://hardyboys.bobfinnan.com/hbpb.htm is just a list of titles that all have links to Amazon. All of the books summaries were copied from Amazon. Every HB Digest title, Casefiles title, Clues Brothers title, Supermysteries title, Ultra Thriller title and so on has a link to Amazon and all summaries were copied from Amazon. Does that tell anyone something?
 * Yep, tells us you're lying! Here's a link to Amazon's Ultra Thriller page (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0671756613/ref=nosim) and not a summary to be seen. Ditto for everything else. BTW, thanks for all the links to my site, I'm sure it will increase readership! :) --FWDixon 14:53, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Oh Really? Lets try a few just on the Undercover Brothers.

Extreme Danger (#1) - 4/05

Finnan: Mission: To find the mastermind behind a possible attack at the Big Air Games. Amazon: Mission: To find the mastermind behind a possible attack at the Big Air Games.

Running On Fumes (#2) - 4/05 Finnan: Mission: Investigate and determine the power behind a possibly dangerous Utopian community with potential plans for criminal activity within the oil industry. Amazon: Mission: Investigate and determine the power behind a possibly dangerous Utopian community with potential plans for criminal activity within the oil industry.

Boardwalk Bust (#3) - 4/05

Finnan: Mission: Investigate and put a halt to the recent rash of jewelry store robberies. Potential danger on the ground and in the air. Amazon: Mission: Investigate and put a halt to the recent rash of jewelry store robberies. Potential danger on the ground and in the air.

OH! You only plagiarized SOME of the summaries? Ultra Thrillers? You mean the summaries you have are not word for word from the back of the books? What summaries for any books in any of these series do you claim you wrote?

Original vs. Revised edition
I just recently read the original version of this book, and the plot was quite different from the summary posted in the article. (I have not read the revised version.) Perhaps there should be a note explaining that the plot summary is for the revised version, not the original 1934 version? Kestenbaum (talk) 11:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. I have identified the version from which the plot summary was written and added space for the other version.  Unfortunatly I can't get my hands on the original version, so I can't write a plot summary for it.  Can anyone else help here? VA6DK (talk) 02:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:The Mark on the Door


text:
Portal:Sweden/Picture

Regalskeppet Vasa, a 17th century Swedish ship of war.

Photo credit: Peter Isotalo

title: Portal:Sweden/Picture


text:
Talk:The Hidden Harbor Mystery

See [] for discussion about User FWDixon/Bob Finnan's link spamming and plagiarism.

More on the link spamming and commercial advertising. Example http://hardyboys.bobfinnan.com/hbpb.htm is just a list of titles that all have links to Amazon. All of the books summaries were copied from Amazon. Every HB Digest title, Casefiles title, Clues Brothers title, Supermysteries title, Ultra Thriller title and so on has a link to Amazon and all summaries were copied from Amazon. Does that tell anyone something?
 * Yep, tells us you're lying! Here's a link to Amazon's Ultra Thriller page (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0671756613/ref=nosim) and not a summary to be seen. Ditto for everything else. BTW, thanks for all the links to my site, I'm sure it will increase readership! :) --FWDixon 14:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Oh Really? Lets try a few just on the Undercover Brothers.

Extreme Danger (#1) - 4/05

Finnan: Mission: To find the mastermind behind a possible attack at the Big Air Games. Amazon: Mission: To find the mastermind behind a possible attack at the Big Air Games.

Running On Fumes (#2) - 4/05 Finnan: Mission: Investigate and determine the power behind a possibly dangerous Utopian community with potential plans for criminal activity within the oil industry. Amazon: Mission: Investigate and determine the power behind a possibly dangerous Utopian community with potential plans for criminal activity within the oil industry.

Boardwalk Bust (#3) - 4/05

Finnan: Mission: Investigate and put a halt to the recent rash of jewelry store robberies. Potential danger on the ground and in the air. Amazon: Mission: Investigate and put a halt to the recent rash of jewelry store robberies. Potential danger on the ground and in the air.

OH! You only plagiarized SOME of the summaries? Ultra Thrillers? You mean the summaries you have are not word for word from the back of the books? What summaries for any books in any of these series do you claim you wrote?
 * Why not claim that Amazon plagiarized also, after all the description came from the back cover of the book and falls under the "Fair Use" provisions. But you don't care about that, you are just a pathetic hate-filled loser with no life and an ax to grind. Very sad.--FWDixon 15:07, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

LOL. Now you didn't write them. I thought I was a liar? Guess you are huh? So WHAT summaries did you write? What was that MY summaries stuff you were saying to Phillip?

Reverting edit made by 74.104.115.170 regarding "Use of racial slurs"
In the context of this article the terms 'black' and 'negro' are relevant and important to the subject matter. They are accurate to the original book, are highly relevant to explaining the history of the story revisions and they are not used in a racially offensive context. VA6DK (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:The Hidden Harbor Mystery


text:
Talk:The Sinister Signpost

See [] for discussion about User FWDixon/Bob Finnan's link spamming and plagiarism.

Original edition
I remember this as being more or less horrifying, at least to an 8 or 10-year-old, which is when I read it. I added a description of the original signpost to the article. I don't recall much else. Wastrel Way (talk) 03:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC) Eric

title: Talk:The Sinister Signpost


text:
Hampton Roads Admirals

The Hampton Roads Admirals were a professional ice hockey team in the East Coast Hockey League (ECHL). They played in Norfolk, Virginia at the Norfolk Scope Arena from 1989 until 2000, when the owners purchased an expansion American Hockey League franchise that became the Norfolk Admirals. In 2015, the AHL Admirals were relocated and the ECHL returned to Norfolk with the current Norfolk Admirals.

Expansion
One-time Chicago Cubs and National League executive Blake Cullen was looking to expand into the Norfolk area for hockey. He arranged an exhibition game between the Virginia Lancers and the Carolina Thunderbirds (originally listed as the Carolina Cougars) to take place at the Norfolk Scope. Cullen said that he "would be happy with 3,000 fans and 4,000 or more would be very encouraging. " The game, played on a Wednesday night between a fourth and fifth place team, drew over 6,200 fans. Because of the turnout, the ECHL was willing to offer Cullen a new franchise for free. However, when a group of five businessmen offered the league $25,000 for territorial rights, Commissioner Pat Kelly told Cullen that he "was a man of his word" and offered the franchise to him for the same price, in which Cullen accepted.

A naming contest would be held in the summer of 1989. Bettie Ann denDekker would win the contest with the name "Admirals".

Inaugural Season
The Hampton Roads Admirals were introduced for the 1989-90 season and developed a rivalry with the Virginia Lancers of Vinton, Virginia throughout the season. The Admirals provided "attention and credibility to the ECHL by drawing an average of 5,885 fans in their inaugural season. Until the Admirals joined the league, owners considered 2,000 fans to be "a good crowd. They would make the post-season in their first season, going 29-29-2 before losing to the Erie Panthers three games to two in a five game series of the opening round of the Riley Cup playoffs. The credibility also caught the attention of two NHL teams: the Detroit Red Wings and the Washington Capitals. Detroit agreed to send eight prospects, while the Washington Capitals agreed to sending a goaltender and an unspecified number of players.

Championships
The Admirals were the flagship franchise of the ECHL, having won Jack Riley Cups in 1991 and 1992, and the Patrick J. Kelly Cup in 1998. The three championships won by the franchise is matched only by the Alaska Aces, Florida Everblades and South Carolina Stingrays. Two years later, the Admirals moved up to the American Hockey League (AHL).

Playoffs

 * 1989–90: Lost to Erie 3-2 in quarterfinals.
 * 1990–91: Defeated Richmond 3-1 in quarterfinals; defeated Johnstown 4-1 in semifinals; defeated Greensboro 4-1 to win championship.
 * 1991–92: Defeated Raleigh 3-1 in first round; defeated Richmond 2-0 in quarterfinals; defeated Greensboro 3-1 in semifinals; defeated Louisville 4-0 to win championship.
 * 1992–93: Lost to Raleigh 3-1 in quarterfinals.
 * 1993–94: Defeated South Carolina 2-1 in first round; lost to Wheeling 3-1 in quarterfinals.
 * 1994–95: Lost to Tallahassee 3-1 in first round.
 * 1995–96: Lost to Richmond 3-0 in first round.
 * 1996–97: Defeated Roanoke 3-1 in first round; lost to South Carolina 3-2 in quarterfinals.
 * 1997–98: Defeated Peoria 3-0 in first round; defeated Roanoke 3-2 in quarterfinals; defeated Wheeling 4-2 in semifinals; defeated Pensacola 4-2 to win championship.
 * 1998–99: Lost to Richmond 3-1 in first round.
 * 1999–00: Defeated Huntington 3-2 in first round; lost to Trenton 3-2 in quarterfinals.

Notable players

 * 🇨🇦 Serge Aubin
 * 🇨🇦 Byron Dafoe
 * 🇨🇦 Aaron Downey
 * 🇩🇪 Olaf Kolzig
 * 🇨🇦 Patrick Lalime
 * 🇸🇰 Jan Lasak
 * 🇨🇦 Stephen Valiquette

title: Hampton Roads Admirals


text:
Stack Light Rifle

The Stack Light Rifle is a light gun that was manufactured by Stack Computer Services for use with the ZX Spectrum, Commodore 64, and VIC-20. It was released in 1983. The rifle is bundled with three games on tape: High Noon, Shooting Gallery, and Grouse Shoot for the Spectrum. Different games were offered for the Commodore 64 and VIC-20 versions (all the games for these two systems were included on one cassette).The Stack Light Rifle is differentiated from future light guns as being realistic looking.

The main pistol is attached to 12 feet of cable which ends in a dead-ended ZX81-size connector which plugs into the Spectrum's user port. A barrel, stock and telescopic sight can all be attached to the pistol. The barrel actually facilitated the gun's performance as it filtered out ambient light. These three parts combined to provide a reasonable – if not perfect – degree of accuracy, and allowed the user to effectively use the light gun from the comfort of an armchair.

Variants of the Light Rifle were available for the ZX Spectrum, VIC-20, and Commodore 64 and all perform the same function. Like the Atari XG-1 light gun, the Stack Light Rifle is treated by the hardware as a light pen. Due to lack of availability of software drivers for the Light Rifle, only the three games that came with the device were available. In April 1985, Sinclair User magazine reported that the Stack Computer Services company had disappeared.

Technical specifications
The main component of the Stack Light Rifle System is the electronic target pistol that is connected to the computer by a generous length of lead. At the computer end, depending on the version, there is a connector for the appropriate socket or edge connector. On the ZX Spectrum version the connector contains two chips and a couple of simple components to interface the main electronics inside the gun to the computer. To make the pistol more accurate and to turn it into a rifle – it is supplied with a shoulder stock that clips and secures to the rear of the pistol, a barrel and a make-believe telescopic sight.

The electronics inside the pistol consist of a light detector or photo-diode and a small amplifier and buffer. Light coming down the barrel is focused by a small plastic lens onto the photo-diode, and the device is sensitive enough to detect the changes in intensity of the picture. Once boosted by the amplifier, the signal is clipped to provide a digital pulse rather than an analogue waveform and is then fed to the computer via the switch. The screen position that is being scanned at that moment is the position the rifle is pointing at. As the computer receives the pulse from the Light Rifle it compares the value of its scan registers with the screen position of the target and, if a match is found, the played has scored a direct hit.

Commodore 64

 * Escape From Alcatraz
 * High Noon
 * Glorious 12th
 * Gallery
 * Crowshoot
 * Rats & Cats
 * Indian Attack
 * Starbase Defender

VIC-20

 * High Noon
 * Glorious 12th
 * Gallery

ZX Spectrum

 * High Noon
 * Invasion Force

title: Stack Light Rifle


text:
Talk:A Figure in Hiding

Spam?
See [] for discussion about User FWDixon/Bob Finnan's link spamming and plagiarism.

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.keeline.com/Hardy_Boys.pdf}}
 * In Footprints Under the Window on 2011-03-19 09:25:03, 404 Not Found
 * In A Figure in Hiding on 2011-06-20 01:25:41, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 01:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

 * The link works fine from the article. The bot appears to be interpreting the "}}" as part of the URL and therefore not finding the PDF file referenced.

VA6DK (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:A Figure in Hiding


text: Category:Atari ST software

title: Category:Atari ST software


text:
User talk:Dana.powers

WikiProject Law
Hi. Thanks for joining WikiProject Law. It's been a bit slow lately, as many of us were prepping for the bar exam, and are now starting jobs, but our goal of making Wikipedia the most comprehensive free internet source of legal information carries on! As a 3L, I found it particularly helpful to my studies to write/edit articles in the areas that we were studying, and I hope you find this to be a useful tool as well. Cheers! -- BD2412 talk 16:44, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Please join the discussion at Portal talk:Law - we're getting things off the ground for featured articles, pictures, cases, and a collaboration of the week! -- BD2412 talk 04:34, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Portal:Law selections
Greetings, fellow WikiProject Law member! One of our tasks on this WikiProject is the upkeep of Portal:Law, where we have set up a four week cycle wherein each week one of four key features - the selected article, biography, case, or image - is rotated out. Previous selections can be found at Portal:Law/former selections. Please contribute your thoughts at Portal talk:Law as to likely candidates for future rotations in each of these categories. Cheers! BD2412 T 05:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum
Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 04:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dana.powers


text:
Licensed practical nurse

A licensed practical nurse (LPN), in much of the United States and Canada, is a nurse who provides direct nursing care for people who are sick, injured, convalescent, or disabled. In the United States, LPNs work under the direction of physicians, mid-level practitioners, and may work under the direction of registered nurses depending on their jurisdiction.

In Canada, LPNs' scope of practices autonomously similar to the registered nurse in providing direct nursing care and are responsible for their individual actions and practice.

Another title provided in the Canadian province of Ontario is "registered practical nurse" (RPN). In California and Texas, such a nurse is referred to as a licensed vocational nurse (LVN).

In the United States, LPN training programs are one to two years in duration. All U.S. state and territorial boards also require passage of the NCLEX-PN exam. In Canada (except for Québec ), the education program is two years of full-time post-secondary and students must pass the Canadian Practical Nurse Registration Exam (CPNRE), administered by the for-profit Yardstick Assessment Strategies. In 2022, Ontario and British Columbia plan to discontinue CPNRE in favour of the REx-PN, administered by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN).

United States
According to the 2010–2011 Occupational Outlook Handbook published by the Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics, licensed practical nurses care for patients in many ways:

"Often, they provide basic bedside care. Many LPNs measure and record patients' vital signs such as weight, height, temperature, blood pressure, pulse, and respiratory rate. A licensed practical nurse (LPN) in much of the United States and most Canadian provinces is a nurse who cares for people who are sick, injured, convalescent, or disabled. LPNs work under the direction of registered nurses or physicians. They also prepare and give injections and enemas, monitor and also perform placement of catheters, dress wounds, and give alcohol rubs and massages. To help keep patients comfortable, they assist with bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene, moving in bed, standing, and walking. They might also feed patients who need help eating. Experienced LPNs may supervise nursing assistants and aides, and other LPNs.

As part of their work, LPNs collect samples for testing, perform routine laboratory tests, and record food and fluid intake and output. They clean and monitor medical equipment. Sometimes, they help physicians and registered nurses perform tests and procedures. Some LPNs help to deliver, care for, and feed infants.

LPNs also monitor their patients and report adverse reactions to medications or treatments. LPNs gather information from patients, including their health history and how they are currently feeling. They may use this information to complete insurance forms, pre-authorizations, and referrals, and they share information with registered nurses and doctors to help determine the best course of care for a patient. LPNs often teach family members how to care for a relative or teach patients about good health habits."

According to the Occupational Outlook Handbook, while most LPNs are generalists and will work in any area of health care, some LPNs work in specialized settings, such as nursing homes, doctor's offices, or in home care. In some American states, LPNs are permitted to administer prescribed medicines, start intravenous fluids, and provide care to ventilator-dependent patients. While about 18 percent of LPNs/LVNs in the United States worked part-time in 2008, most work a 40-hour week. The Occupational Outlook Handbook states that LPNs may have to work nights, weekends, and holidays; often stand for long periods and help patients move in bed, stand, or walk; and may face occupational hazards which include exposure to caustic chemicals, radiation, and infectious diseases; back injuries from moving patients; workplace stress; and sometimes confused, agitated, or uncooperative patients."

In California, licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) empty bedpans, commodes and clean and change incontinent adults. Licensed vocational nurses read vital signs such as pulse, temperature, blood pressure and respiration. They administer injections and enemas, monitor catheters and give massages or alcohol rubs. They may apply dressings, hot water bottles and ice packs. They help patients bathe and dress, treat bedsores and change soiled bed sheets. LVNs feed patients and record their food consumption, while monitoring the fluids they take in and excrete.

In May 2023, the median annual wages of LPNs/LVNs in the United States was $59,730, with the lowest 10 percent earning less than $45,670, and the highest 10 percent earning more than $77,870. Median annual wages differed by setting:

According to the Occupational Outlook Handbook, in 2008 there were some 753,600 jobs held by LPNs/LVNs in the United States, with about 25 percent working in hospitals, 28 percent in nursing care facilities, and 12 percent in physicians' offices. Other LPNs/LVN worked for home health care services; employment services; residential care facilities; community care facilities; outpatient care centers; and federal, state, and local government agencies. In the United States, employment of LPNs is projected to grow by 21 percent between 2008 and 2018, much faster than average. The growth is expected to be driven by the "long-term care needs of an increasing elderly population and the general increase in demand for healthcare services". By contrast hospitals are phasing out licensed practical nurses. While LPN jobs were expected to decline, in 2010 the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the job growth rate of Licensed Practical Nurses as 22%, far above the national average of 14%. Median annual salary was reported as $44,090 per year, and hourly salary was reported as $19.42.

In the United States, training programs to become a LPN/LVN last about one year and are offered by vocational/technical schools and by community colleges. The Occupational Outlook Handbook states that in order to be eligible for licensure, LPNs must complete a state-approved training program. A high school diploma or equivalent usually is required for acceptance into a training program, but some programs accept candidates without a diploma and some programs are part of a high school curriculum. According to the Occupational Outlook Handbook states that most programs include both classroom study (covering basic nursing concepts and subjects related to patient care, including anatomy, physiology, medical-surgical nursing, pediatrics, obstetrics nursing, pharmacology, nutrition, and first aid) and supervised clinical practice (usually in a hospital setting, but sometimes elsewhere).

The National Council Licensure Examination-Practical Nurse (NCLEX-PN), a computer-based national licensing exam developed and administered by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, is the exam required to obtain licensure as a LPN/LVN. In many states, LPNs/LVNs are required to obtain continuing education credits throughout their career.

Advancement
In some settings, LPNs/LVNs have opportunities for advancement, including the possibility of becoming credentialed in a certain area (such as IV therapy, gerontology, long-term care and pharmacology) or of becoming a charge nurse, responsible for overseeing the work of other LPNs and various unlicensed assistive personnel, such as nursing assistants. Some LPNs/LVNs choose to undergo further education and become registered nurses. LPN-to-RN training programs ("bridge programs") exist for this purpose. These include further classroom study to obtain at least an Associate of Science in Nursing (ASN) and clinical practice followed by another exam, the National Council Licensure Examination-Registered Nurse (NCLEX-RN).

The origins of the practical/vocational nurse can be traced back to the practice of self-taught individuals who worked in home care in the past, assisting with basic care (ADLs such as bathing) and light housekeeping duties (such as cooking). Licensing standards for practical nurses came later than those for professional nurses; by 1945, 19 states and one territory had licensure laws, but only one state law covered practical nursing. By 1955, however, every state had licensing laws for practical nurses. Practical nurses who had been functioning as such at the time new standards were adopted were usually granted a license by waiver, and exempted from new training requirements.

The first formal training program for practical nurses was developed at the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA) in New York City in 1892. The following year this became the Ballard School of Practical Nursing (after Lucinda Ballard, an early benefactor) and was a three-month-long course of study concerned with the care of infants, children and the elderly and disabled. The curriculum included instruction in cooking and nutrition as well as basic science and nursing. The school closed in 1949 after the YWCA was reorganized. Other early practical nursing education program include the Thompson Practical Nursing School, established in 1907 in Brattleboro, Vermont, (still in operation today) and the Household Nursing School (later the Shepard-Gill School of Practical Nursing), established in 1918 in Boston. In 1930, there were still just 11 schools of practical nursing, but between 1948 and 1954, 260 more opened. The Association of Practical Nurse Schools (APNS) as founded in 1942, and the next year the name of the organization was changed to National Association for Practical Nurse Education and Service (NAPNAS), and the first planned curriculum for practical nurses as developed.

Canada
In Canada, nursing, as with all other health care professions and trades, is regulated by the respective province or territory, through an enabling statute legal scheme where an act of the relevant legislature grants delegated authority to a non-sovereign entity such as a college of nurses with powers to regulate the profession within specific parameters and also grants to the respective minister of the Crown oversight and the powers to write regulations through a Ministerial Order in Council.

As an example, the Canadian province of British Columbia's enabling act is the Health Professions Act, RSBC 1996, c. 183, and the resulting nursing-specific regulation is incorporated into one Regulation together with a number of other practitioners such as audiologists and naturopaths in the Health Professions Designation Regulation, BC Reg 270/2008.

While the act and the regulation outline basic organizational architecture, each professional organization creates its own bylaws and codes of conduct and practice subject to ministerial and judicial review and must be in compliance with accepted norms of administrative law such as transparency and accountability in governance, fundamental principles of natural justice, an internal appeal process and compliance with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Such legal schemes enable self-governance and save costs to governments by delegating regulatory responsibilities to a self-funded and self-administered professional entity, but are also known to engage in protectionist practices since the delegation also grants a monopoly for the provision of services to only one body, as widely studied by the late economist

A nurse who is entitled to practice in one jurisdiction cannot work in another without applying to and being granted a license by the local regulatory body. Educational, legal and practice requirements are similar, so mobility is possible; however, the nurse still has to fulfill requirements, such as writing exams and paying fees, in each location they wish to practice. This is akin to all other regulated professions where the provincial government holds exclusive jurisdiction.

Practical nurse compensation
The average hourly practical nursing salary at the entry level is 24.00 CAD an hour. The highest practical nursing salary at the experienced level is 36.00 CAD. However, some practical nurses may make upwards of 40.00 CAD an hour. Many nurses also receive overtime compensation for the long hours and understaffing of many institutions.

Ontario
Ontario uses the designation Registered Practical Nurse to refer to a role known as Licensed Practical Nurse in the rest of Canada and elsewhere. This should not be confused with Registered Psychiatric Nurse, a title used in certain other Canadian jurisdictions.

All nurses in the province of Ontario are regulated by the College of Nurses of Ontario (CNO), to which they must apply for and maintain membership. "College" in this case is used similarly to the word "board"; they are not a school or training provider themselves. To apply for membership, an applicant must satisfy requirements including completion of an approved two year post secondary training program, evidence of recent practice as a nurse, pass both an entrance and jurisprudence examination, be proficient in either English or French, have legal authorization to be employed in Canada, disclosure of certain past or ongoing legal proceedings, disclosure of certain proceedings involving practice of nursing in other jurisdictions and disclosure of certain kinds of health conditions and disabilities.

In 2008, there were 27,432 RPNs registered as practicing with the CNO. By 2017, this has increased to 48,748.

By comparison to other classes of nursing in Ontario, there were 104,483 RNs and 3,083 NPs. 90.9% of the 2017 RPNs were female and the average age was 40.8 years. 89.9% attended a nursing school in Ontario; however members who previously attended nursing schools outside Ontario which were not accepted as valid by the CNO at the time of their registration are not reflected in that number.

The CNO's definition for a nurse's scope of practice is: "The practice of nursing is the promotion of health and the assessment of, the provision of care for, and the treatment of health conditions by supportive, preventive, therapeutic, palliative, and rehabilitative means in order to attain or maintain optimal function".

The College of Nurses of Ontario (CNO) outlines 13 controlled acts, 4 of which can be performed by RPNs and RNs. The 4 Controlled Acts available to be performed by RNs and RPNs are:
 * Performing a prescribed procedure below the dermis or mucous membrane
 * Administering a substance by injection or inhalation
 * Putting an instrument, hand, or finger:
 * Beyond the external ear canal
 * Beyond the point in the nasal passages where they normally narrow
 * Beyond the larynx
 * Beyond the opening of the urethra
 * Beyond the labia majora
 * Beyond the anal verge or
 * Into an artificial opening in the body
 * Dispensing a drug

The College of Nurses of Ontario (CNO) has 4 principal roles in the regulation of Ontario nurses:
 * Articulating and Promoting Practice Standards
 * Establishing Requirements for Entry to Practice
 * Administering a Quality Assurance Program
 * Enforcing Standards of Practice and Conduct

The CNO has set 7 standards of practice for all nurses in Ontario: Registered Nurses are expected to have a higher level of competency in the last three of these standards of practice than RPNs. In Alberta, LPN's have a greater scope of practice than most provinces. They can perform most tasks that an RN can do, however, the complexity of the patient's condition determines if the LPN is in charge of care, or collaborating on care with an RN. In Ontario, RPNs are actively expanding their roles and scope of practice, modelling similarly to Alberta, with the exception that in Ontario, both RNs and RPNs are regulated by the same regulatory body. This model allows for both categories of nurses to be practising under the same guidelines and accountability models. In Canada, in home-care settings LPNs sometimes act as the liaison between the care provider and the local health authority, coordinating care.
 * Accountability
 * Continuing Competence
 * Ethics
 * Relationships (Therapeutic Nurse-Client Relationships and Professional Relationships)
 * Knowledge
 * Knowledge Application
 * Leadership

United Kingdom
The state enrolled nursing qualification can no longer be gained in Britain. Prior to the implementation of Project 2000 which radically altered the face of nurse education in the mid-1990s, SEN students used to be trained within two years. Their course was a simplified version of the longer training offered to state registered nurses (SRNs, later to be renamed RGNs, registered general nurses and now known as level-one nurses). Some auxiliary nurses with many years of experience were selected to progress to enrollment as a SEN. People training to be SRNs who failed their exams at the third attempt were also able to enter the nursing register as a SEN. No new SENs are trained in the UK today. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (the regulatory body for nurses in the UK) previously used to allow people to be added to the register as level two nurses if they are moving from a similar position from within the European Union, however this has now stopped. Level-two nurses from the EU wishing to gain entry to the Register in the UK must be willing to train as a first level (staff) nurse. This is by two different means: starting their training from scratch as a pre-registration student nurse, or by joining an existing cohort of student nurses starting their second year of training, and completing years 2 and 3 with them

Formerly, there was a large segregation between the "green" SENs and "blue" SRNs, which were the colour of uniform typically worn. SENs were very much complementary to the nursing team, however did not have the status of SRNs and were ineligible to be promoted, e.g., to ward sister. Many SENs sat or re-sat the SRN exams, however a large number did not and were quite content being a SEN. Nowadays, the divide between level one and two nurses is diminishing due to the small number of SENs still in practice. The demise of the SEN is lamented by many who saw it as a balanced way to staff a ward. However, the divide also meant that potentially, the gap in clinical excellence could be too wide. In many areas, ENs and SENs are being replaced with lesser qualified healthcare assistants educated to S/NVQ Level 3 or 4, being awarded titles such as Senior Healthcare Assistant, Senior Auxiliary Nurse, Senior Clinical Support Worker, Care Team Leader or Senior Care Assistant.

Although originally viewed as a less qualified nurse, ENs and SENs are now able to hold the rank of Deputy Charge Nurse in the NHS and Deputy Home Manager in the private sector, as well as unit manager, both within the NHS and the private sector, and in some instances higher, technically out-ranking a staff nurse (first-level RN). Auxiliary nurses draw blood samples, change bandages, and record ECGs. At present, they work under the direct supervision of a registered nurse.

As of 2018 the Enrolled Nurse has been re introduced to the UK and these practitioners hold the title of Registered Nurse Associate. RNA's must complete a two-year foundation degree and hold formal registration with the NMC. RNA's must also revalidate every three years as is also the case for RN's. They are placed at band 4 in the NHS banding system. RNA's are responsible for their own allocated patients and are certified to administer most medications. This bridged the gap between the lesser qualified HCA and RN. As far back as 2004 the Enrolled Nurse role was brought back in a limited fashion, placed at band 4 and called Assistant Practitioners. Whilst they continue to work within the NHS today they are not registered practitioners.

Australia
The national Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) issues permission to practise. Enrolled nurses (EN), or Division 2 nurses, in Australia must now complete the Diploma of Nursing and usually spend 18 months training, consisting of 36 weeks theoretical component at TAFE colleges, some universities or private institutions, followed by practical experience in hospital wards for the remainder of the time. The majority of ENs eventually move on to attend university and become registered nurses, although a substantial number remain as ENs in public and private hospitals, and nursing homes. Trainee enrolled nurses (TENs) become employees of the hospital for the twelve-month training period, meaning that, as well as gaining practical experience on the wards, they are paid for hours worked. This attracts a substantial number of applicants, who may wish to pursue nursing as a career, but are unable to afford to become full-time university students. As of 2009, however, the government has stopped working with the NSW Department of Health, and those wishing to become enrolled nurses are not being paid. The enrolled nurse programme also allows people to ascertain whether or not they are suited to nursing before they make the decision to study it at university level.

The role of enrolled nurses in Australia has greatly increased in recent years in response to the continuing shortage of registered nurses in the Australian public health care system. In 2004, a medication endorsement certificate was introduced, allowing ENs to administer some oral medication (excluding schedule 8 drugs of addiction) upon completion. Although medication endorsement is now included in the diploma. Endorsement also permits the administration of some intravenous (IV) medications and fluids (intravenous therapy or IVT), as well as intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) injections. Enrolled nurses (ENs) are also permitted to check & give Schedule 4 and Schedule 8 medications with a registered nurse. Most enrolled nurses working in public hospitals are permitted to conduct ECGs, collect pathology specimens, and routinely take a patient load under the direct supervision of a registered nurse.

Despite the fact that the role of the EN in Australia has been greatly expanded in recent years, opportunities for career progression remain somewhat limited, and for this reason, many choose to go on and study to become registered nurses. In terms of financial remuneration, the earning capacity of an enrolled nurse is capped at five years of service, whereas registered nurses continue to eight years before salary capping is applied.

title: Licensed practical nurse


text:
Talk:American Eagle Flight 4184

Speed
The article mentions that the aircraft hit the ground at over 430 mph, and this is described as an extreme velocity. My first thought was to explain why this velocity is extreme, but the article on the ATR 72-212 only gives the aircraft's cruising speed (318 mph). It would be nice to know how fast the aircraft can be pushed in safe flight. -Ashley Pomeroy 17:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

=
============== The ATR72 VMO (max operating spped) is 250kts (287MPH) Source ATR72 ACM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.11.207.122 (talk) 07:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I think you missed the point. That is an extreme speed for any airliner which makes contact with the ground. Even the biggest ones are not traveling at more than 140 to 150 Kts, when they make normal landings. That speed, and the severe disintegration that resulted, is major evidence that the pilots had lost all control of the aircraft. That was the point: It crashed because the pilots had lost all control.

EditorASC 03:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * They regained some control, but the pilots ran out of room to recover. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:59, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Well, I suppose it boils down to what one might consider as "some" control. They did finally get the wings back to level with the horizon, so that they could start to pull the nose back up, in a desperate attempt to arrest the high rate of descent, before impacting the ground.  However, they pulled back too hard on the elevators, considering their speed (375 kts).  Doing that increased the G-load on the aircraft to over 3.7 Gs, so that the outer portions of the wings, and the tail plane snapped off.  Did that constitute having "some" control?

 * I guess it would be fair to answer that in the affirmative, if one means the same kind of control that the Captain still had of the Martin 404 charter flight for the Wichita State University football team, before he finally flew into the mountains, west of Denver, because he was flying over a valley that was not wide enuf to permit a 180 degree course reversal and because the plane did not have enuf power and time to climb above the altitude of the mountain peaks ahead.  He had "some" control, but not enuf to prevent the inevitable crash ahead.

 * Anyway, thanks for pointing that out. Helps one to sharpen his thoughts and words a bit, in the future. EditorASC (talk) 05:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Aftermath
Citations were requested for this section. I revised this section to show that although the de-icing boots were extended back further on the chord, by order of the FAA, that amounted to little more than a cosmetic/political band aid, since the icing tests revealed that those planes could ice up all the way back to 23% of the wing chord and to 30% of the tail-plane chord (there have been numerous crashes over the years because of icing on the tail-plane).

I lifted quotations from my own article, at my own website, which is based a lot on the excellent and very detailed research data found in Stephen Fredrick's book. Thus, I posted citations to both my article and to his book. I own that website and the copyright on the article, and hereby grant Wiki the GFDL license to use it. I am not sure if I also need to fill out some kind of form, to make the license legal for Wiki. I will appreciate any help on that point, if this is not sufficient. It is difficult to email my website, due to the spam problem there, so contact me at b o b 9 3 2 at  g m a i l   dot  c o m, if I need to change or add anything, to comply with Wiki rules. Thanks much. EditorASC 03:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Opening Style
Considering the fact that the opening doesn't exactly impugn anyone, why does it go out of its way to avoid mentioning the acting parties? "control was lost" is needlessly passive. How 'bout "Pilots lost control," or something similar? It would just sound better. Or less evasive, at least. Just bringing it up in case I'm missing something. J.M. Archer (talk) 19:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

 * I agree, that much more needs to be said about who was really culpable in this crash, that should never have happened. It wasn't the pilots.  The NTSB makes that very clear.  It was the plane's manufacturer (ATR), and the French govt and our own FAA, all of which played their respective parts in covering  up the anti-icing deficiencies of that aircraft, so that they could continue to sell that plane to unsuspecting companies, that really didn't know how dangerous it might become, in prolonged icing conditions.  That is why I am in the process now of replacing the "Cause" statement, with the entire "Probable Cause" statement (unabridged), which is found in the NTSB accident report.  I think it essential that the NTSB's finding be stated in this article, WORD-FOR-WORD.  Anything less tends to distract attention away from the real culprits, who have been exposed by the very thorough investigation of the NTSB.  EditorASC (talk) 05:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

 * The NTSB did not blame the manufacturer. The crash was blamed on the weather; specifically the aircraft encountered icing conditions that exceeded the aircraft's certification envelope.  The NTSB noted in the contributing factors section that previous ATR 42/72 aircraft had encountered control problems and recommended that the regulations themselves be strengthened and the aircraft type and others like it updated.  The fact remains that FAA AC 91-74A recommends pilots exit icing conditions as soon as possible whether the airplane is approved for flight in known icing conditions or not.  However, this recommendation is not law.  There was no cover-up; the airplane passed the FAA icing standard and had it encountered icing conditions equal to the standard it would have flown just fine.  The aircraft encountered severe icing, which no airplane is certified for flight within.  I do however agree that the word-for-word NTSB probable cause statement is the proper statement for the "cause" section.  (Brief Note to EditorASC:  I very much appreciate your extensive airline experience; I simply disagree with the notion of a cover-up)  (N419BH (talk) 20:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC))

 * While the NTSB did not specifically use the phrase "cover up," it did in fact blame ATR, DGAC and our FAA for their failures to carry out their safety duties. That is consistent with the story, in great detail, in the Stephen Fredrick book "Unheeded Warning."  Please read the actual NTSB Probable Cause statement (not the one changed in wording, by ASN).  To avoid POV, I put in the actual word-for-word NTSB Probable Cause finding.  That is the best source of all.  Here are some additional statements, by the NTSB in that accident report:

"9. The flightcrew’s actions were consistent with their training and knowledge.

"10. PIREPs [pilot reports] of icing conditions, based on the current icing severity definitions, may often be misleading to pilots, especially to pilots in aircraft that may be more vulnerable to the effects of icing than other aircraft.

"13. The 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 25, Appendix C, envelope is limited and does not include conditions of freezing drizzle or freezing rain; thus, the current process by which aircraft are certified using the Appendix C icing envelope is inadequate and does not require manufacturers to sufficiently demonstrate the airplane's capabilities in all the possible icing conditions that can, and do, occur in nature.

"15. If the FAA had acted more positively upon the Safety Board's aircraft icing recommendations issued in 1981, this accident may not have occurred.

"16. ATR 42 and 72 ice-induced aileron hinge moment reversals, autopilot disconnects, and rapid, uncommanded rolls could occur if the airplanes are operated in near freezing temperatures and water droplet median volume diameter (MVDs) typical of freezing drizzle.

"17. At the initiation of the aileron hinge moment reversal affecting flight 4184, the 60 pounds of force on the control wheel required to maintain a wings-level-attitude were within the standards set forth by the Federal Aviation Regulations. However, rapid, uncommanded rolls and the sudden onset of 60 pounds of control wheel force without any warning to the pilot, or training for such unusual events, would most likely preclude a flightcrew from making a timely recovery.

"19. The French Directorate General for Civil Aviation (DGAC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) failed to require the manufacturer to provide documentation of known undesirable post- SPS [stall protection system] flight characteristics, which contributed to their failure to identify and correct, or otherwise properly address, the abnormal aileron behavior early in the history of the ATR icing incidents.

"21. Prior to the Roselawn accident, ATR recognized the reason for the aileron behavior in the previous incidents and determined that ice accumulation behind the deice boots, at an AOA sufficient to cause an airflow separation, would cause the ailerons to become unstable. Therefore, ATR had sufficient basis to modify the airplane and/or provide operators and pilots with adequate, detailed information regarding this phenomenon.

"22. The 1989 icing simulation package developed by ATR for the training simulators did not provide training for pilots to recognize the onset of an aileron hinge moment reversal or to execute the appropriate recovery techniques.

"23. ATR’s proposed post-Mosinee AFM/FCOM changes, even if adopted by the DGAC and the FAA, would not have provided flightcrews with sufficient information to identify or recover from the type of event that occurred at Roselawn, and the actions taken by ATR following the Mosinee incident were insufficient.

"24. The 1992 ATR All Weather Operations brochure was misleading and minimized the known catastrophic potential of ATR operations in freezing rain.

"25. ATR failed to disseminate adequate warnings and guidance to operators about the adverse characteristics of, and techniques to recover from, ice-induced aileron hinge moment reversal events; and ATR failed to develop additional airplane modifications, which led directly to this accident.

"26. The DGAC failed to require ATR to take additional corrective actions, such as performing additional icing tests, issuing more specific warnings regarding the aileron hinge moment reversal phenomenon, developing additional airplane modifications, and providing specific guidance on the recovery from a hinge moment reversal, which led directly to this accident.

"27. The FAA's failure, following the 1994 Continental Express incident at Burlington, Massachusetts, to require that additional actions be taken to alert operators and pilots to the specific icing-related problems affecting the ATRs, and to require action by the manufacturer to remedy the airplane's propensity for aileron hinge moment reversals in certain icing conditions, contributed to this accident.

"28. The FAA Aircraft Evaluation Group (AEG) did not receive in a timely manner, from all sources, pertinent documentation (such as the ATR analyses) regarding the previous ATR icing incidents/accidents that could have been used to monitor the continued airworthiness of the airplane.

"29. The ability of the FAA's AEG to monitor, on a real-time basis, the continued airworthiness of the ATR airplanes was hampered by the inadequately defined lines of communication, the inadequate means for the AEG to retrieve pertinent airworthiness information, and the DGAC's failure to provide the FAA with critical airworthiness information, because of the DGAC's apparent belief that the information was not required to be provided under the terms of the Bilateral Airworthiness Agreement (BAA). These deficiencies also raise concerns about the scope and effectiveness of the BAA.

"35. Because the DGAC did not require ATR, and ATR did not provide to the operators of its airplanes, information that specifically alerted flightcrews to the fact that encounters with freezing rain could result in sudden autopilot disconnects, aileron hinge moment reversals, and rapid roll excursions, or guidance on how to cope with these events, the crew of flight 4184 had no reason to expect that the icing conditions they were encountering would cause the sudden onset of an aileron hinge moment reversal, autopilot disconnect, and loss of aileron control.

"37. The flightcrew’s failure to increase the propeller RPM to 86 percent and activate the Level III ice protection system in response to the 1533:56 caution alert chime was not a factor in the accident.

"38. Had ice accumulated on the wing leading edges so as to burden the ice protection system, or if the crew had been able to observe the ridge of ice building behind the deice boots or otherwise been provided a means of determining that an unsafe condition was developing from holding in those icing conditions, it is probable that the crew would have exited the conditions.

"43. Although both crew members of flight 4184 were certified flight instructors, this was probably the first time they had experienced such unexpected and excessive roll and pitch attitudes in the ATR 72. If the operators had been required to conduct unusual attitude training, the knowledge from this training might have assisted the flightcrew in its recovery efforts and might have prompted the captain to provide useful information to the first officer to facilitate a timely recovery of the airplane."

 * There is much more in that report which makes it abundantly clear that the NTSB laid the blame on the FAA, DGAC and ATR, and not on the pilots. While it is true that the French objected to the NTSB findings and then filed those objections, it is also true that the NTSB rejected their objections, and with very good reasons.

 * As to the FAA's icing certification standards (FAR part 25, appendix C), they were clearly archaic at the time of the accident, being based largely on information from NACA (predecessor to NASA), formulated in 1949, when the certification standards were concerned with DC-3s, Connies and DC-6s. Fredrick's book has a very extensive discussion on just how archaic they were.  You also can find how ludicrous those standards were, in a very comprehensive study by the Flight Safety Foundation (Protection Against Icing: A Comprehensive Overview  -- 248 pages) at http://flightsafety.org/fsd/fsd_jun-sep97.pdf  I recommend you start reading at page 155 in that report. The archaic nature of those FAA regs, was precisely why the NTSB kept prodding the FAA to revise and update its certification standards, for so many years before this tragic accident. But, as par-for-the-FAA-course, the NTSB's recommendations were ignored by the FAA, until after this  accident report.

 * I suggest you read the entire NTSB report and also Fredrick's book. EditorASC (talk) 02:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

FAR part 25, appendix C
I have restored the word "archaic," since it is a proper word to describe the FAA's terribly outdated icing certification rules. The NTSB has used that word in the past, when it feels some of the FAA's regs are out of date. Additionally, that word is used in the Fredrick book too, as part of a very extensive discussion on that issue. And finally, it is used by the Flight Safety Foundation (Protection Against Icing: A Comprehensive Overview  -- 248 pages) at http://flightsafety.org/fsd/fsd_jun-sep97.pdf, in its discussion of how unrealistic and old and outdated those certification regs really were. EditorASC (talk) 02:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:28, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

American Eagle Flight 4184 → Simmons Airlines Flight 4184 — Should be moved to Simmons Airlines Flight 4184, since Simmons Airlines operated the aircraft, not American Eagle. --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. "American Eagle..." seems to be the common name according to both Goolge and Google news archive.  It also appears to be how the flight was branded adding support to this being the common name.  Technically from an aviation industry point of view it might have been "Simmons Airlines ..." but we use common names on wikipedia and so it should stay where it is. Dpmuk (talk) 21:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose. I guess here on Wikipedia, it seems we always use the common name, even when it would not be consistent with other article on plane crashes, like Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907. [|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|] 17:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lawsuit
The article states that a lawsuit was brought, but was settled for a large amount of money. But it never says who was sued. American Eagle? Simmons? ATR? --Golbez (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC) And it says for the victims. All the victims of that crash died! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.205.52.105 (talk) 16:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Eagle Flight 4184. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130609212558/http://aviation.cliffordlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Roselawn.pdf to http://aviation.cliffordlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Roselawn.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Article may be outdated
I just reworded the article, removing the claim about a "lack of further ATR icing accidents". Most of this article was written before 2010, when Aero Caribbean Flight 883 crashed due to icing. There have mostly been maintenance edits since then. In light of that, I believe that this article could use an overhaul that goes beyond what I did. I will put a request for update box into the article. Renerpho (talk) 04:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * It also does not mention TransAsia Airways Flight 791, another ATR 72 that crashed in 2002 due to icing. Renerpho (talk) 04:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC) That's included now. Renerpho (talk) 04:42, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Number 9 in the references
Sends you to 404 error, "Sorry, we can't find what you're looking for" at Chicago Tribune website. 155.186.172.220 (talk) 04:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

 * It's a dead url. I've repaired it. Do it yourself! see WP:DEADLINK for how to fix this issue. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore the morgue) 04:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:American Eagle Flight 4184


text:
Talk:The Twisted Claw

See [] for discussion about User FWDixon/Bob Finnan's link spamming and plagiarism.

title: Talk:The Twisted Claw


text: Portal:Sweden/Did you know

title: Portal:Sweden/Did you know


text:
Talk:The Disappearing Floor

Linkspam
See [] for discussion about User FWDixon/Bob Finnan's link spamming and plagiarism.

Image
I reverted from Image:Hardy_boys_cover_19.jpg back to Image:The_Dissappering_Floor.jpg because the latter is a slightly bigger, clearer image. --GentlemanGhost 19:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC) This story rocks=] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.27.205.90 (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:The Disappearing Floor