text:
Plitvice Lakes incident

The Plitvice Lakes incident (Krvavi Uskrs na Plitvicama or Plitvički krvavi Uskrs, both translating as "Plitvice Bloody Easter") was an armed clash at the beginning of the Croatian War of Independence. It was fought between Croatian police and armed forces from the Croatian Serb-established SAO Krajina at the Plitvice Lakes in Croatia, on 31 March 1991. The fighting followed the SAO Krajina's takeover of the Plitvice Lakes National Park and resulted in Croatia recapturing the area. The clash resulted in one killed on each side and contributed to the worsening ethnic tensions.

The fighting prompted the Presidency of Yugoslavia to order the Yugoslav People's Army (Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija – JNA) to step in and create a buffer zone between the opposing forces. The JNA arrived at the scene the following day and presented Croatia with an ultimatum requesting the police to withdraw. Even though the special police units which captured the Plitvice Lakes area did pull out on 2 April, a newly established Croatian police station, staffed by 90 officers, remained in place. The police station was blockaded by the JNA three months later, and captured in late August 1991.

Background
In 1990, following the electoral defeat of the government of the Socialist Republic of Croatia, ethnic tensions worsened. The Yugoslav People's Army (Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija – JNA) confiscated Croatia's Territorial Defence (Teritorijalna obrana – TO) weapons to minimize resistance. On 17 August, the tensions escalated into an open revolt of the Croatian Serbs, centred on the predominantly Serb-populated areas of the Dalmatian hinterland around Knin, parts of the Lika, Kordun, Banovina regions and eastern Croatia. They established a Serbian National Council in July 1990, to coordinate opposition to Croatian President Franjo Tuđman's policy of pursuing independence for Croatia. Milan Babić, a dentist from the southern town of Knin, was elected president. Knin's police chief, Milan Martić, established paramilitary militias. The two men eventually became the political and military leaders of the SAO Krajina, a self-declared state incorporating the Serb-inhabited areas of Croatia.

In the beginning of 1991, Croatia had no regular army. In an effort to bolster its defence, Croatia doubled the size of its police force to about 20,000. The most effective part of the force was the 3,000-strong special police that were deployed in 12 battalions adopting military organisation. In addition there were 9,000–10,000 regionally organised reserve police. The reserve police were set up in 16 battalions and 10 companies, but they lacked weapons.

In an effort to consolidate territory under their control, Croatian Serb leaders organised a political rally at the Plitvice Lakes on 25 March 1991, demanding the area be annexed to the SAO Krajina. Three days later, on 28 March, SAO Krajina special police seized the area, and with the help of armed civilians, removed the Croatian management of the Plitvice Lakes National Park. The force deployed by the SAO Krajina to the Plitvice Lakes was estimated to be approximately 100-strong. The region was relatively sparsely populated and there was no obvious threat to Serbs there. Journalist Tim Judah suggests that the move may have been motivated by a desire to control a strategic road that ran north–south through the park, linking the Serb communities in the Lika and Banovina regions.

Timeline
Croatia deployed special police forces, specifically the Lučko, Rakitje and Sljeme special police units based in and around Zagreb, supported by additional police forces drawn from Karlovac and Gospić to retake the Plitvice Lakes area. The Croatian police force, commanded by Josip Lucić, used several buses and passenger cars, as well as an armoured personnel carrier, to approach the Plitvice Lakes area. The main 180-strong group of the Rakitje Special Police Unit (SPU), directly commanded by Lucić, arrived in dense fog, along the main road from Zagreb via the Korana River bridge. The bridge was secured by the Lučko unit shortly before midnight on 30/31 March 1991. An auxiliary force approached the Plitvice Lakes via Ličko Petrovo Selo, while the Kumrovec SPU was deployed in the area between the lakes and Gospić, where it captured the Ljubovo Pass to secure the right flank of the main effort. The total attacking force comprised approximately 300 troops.

The approaching convoy was ambushed at a barricade set up by the SAO Krajina force near Plitvice Lakes before 7:00 in the morning of Easter Sunday, 31 March 1991. The SAO Krajina force attacked the vehicles carrying the Croatian police and held their position until they fell back to the national park post office two and a half hours later. The Croatian advance, additionally hindered by deep snow, was achieved at a cost of six wounded. The attacking force secured its objectives by 11:00 am. As the attacking operation reached its completion, the Croatian military sustained its first combat fatality of the Croatian War of Independence, when Josip Jović was killed by a machine gun covering retreating SAO Krajina troops. Shortly afterwards, the Yugoslav Air Force dispatched a Mil Mi-8 helicopter to attend to wounded on both sides, and it left the area after an hour and a half. The helicopter was dispatched by Colonel General Anton Tus, head of the Yugoslav Air Force at the time, following a request by Josip Boljkovac, Interior Minister of Croatia. As the fighting around Plitvice ended, sporadic gunfire was reported near Titova Korenica, to the south. The same afternoon, a Croatian police station was established at the Plitvice Lakes and Tomislav Iljić was appointed its commanding officer. The station was staffed by approximately 90 police officers who were redeployed from Gospić.

The Presidency of Yugoslavia met in an emergency session the same evening to discuss the clash. At the insistence of Serbia's representative on the Presidency, Borisav Jović, the JNA was ordered to intervene, gain control in the area and prevent further combat. The Serbian parliament also met in an emergency session, treating the clashes as a virtual casus belli and voting to offer the Krajina Serbs "all necessary help" in their conflict with Zagreb. The following day, the SAO Krajina adopted a resolution to the effect that the territory was incorporated into Serbia, whose constitution and laws were adopted for use in the Serb-held areas of Croatia. Croatian authorities accused Serbia's president, Slobodan Milošević, of stage-managing the unrest in order to break Croatia's resolve to declare independence unless Yugoslavia was transformed into a loose confederation. They also accused him of attempting to coax the JNA to overthrow Croatian government.

JNA intervention
On 1 April, the JNA established a buffer zone to separate the belligerents at Plitvice Lakes, deploying elements of the 1st and the 5th Military Districts. Those were an armoured battalion of the 329th Armoured Brigade based in Banja Luka, a battalion of the 6th Mountain Brigade based in Delnice, a reconnaissance company and a mechanised battalion of the 4th Armoured Brigade based in Jastrebarsko and Karlovac, a battalion of the 306th Light Anti-Aircraft Artillery Regiment based in Zagreb, a signals company of the 367th Signals Regiment based in Samobor, a company of the 13th Military Police Battalion based in Rijeka and an anti-aircraft artillery battery drawn from the 13th Proletarian Motorised Brigade based in Rijeka. Finally, the 5th Military District set up a forward command post at the Plitvice Lakes. The JNA force at the Plitvice Lakes was commanded by Colonel Ivan Štimac.

The commanding officer of the 5th Military District, Major General Andrija Rašeta, in overall command of the JNA intervention, told the media that his men were not protecting either side and were there only to prevent ethnic confrontations for an indeterminate period. However, the Croatian government reacted furiously to the JNA move. Tuđman's aide, Mario Nobilo, claimed that the JNA had told Croatian officials that it would engage the police if they did not leave Plitvice. In a radio address, Tuđman said that the JNA would be regarded as a hostile army of occupation if its course of action remained unchanged. On 2 April, the JNA handed the Croatian authorities an ultimatum, requesting the police leave Plitvice. The special police left Plitvice the same day, but the 90 officers staffing the newly established police station remained in place.

Aftermath
Police officer Josip Jović was the only Croatian fatality in the incident. The SAO Krajina force also suffered one killed in the fighting—Rajko Vukadinović, who was the first Croatian Serb combat fatality in the war. A total of 20 people were wounded, seven of whom were the Croatian police. The Croatian forces captured 29 SAO Krajina troops, 18 of whom were formally charged with insurgency. Among the prisoners was Goran Hadžić, later to become the President of the Republic of Serbian Krajina, although he was quickly released. Hadžić's release was explained as a goodwill gesture by the authorities, but Boljkovac claims he was released because he was collaborating with the Croatian authorities in 1991. Approximately 400 tourists, most of them Italian, were evacuated from the Plitvice Lakes after the fighting.

The clash at the Plitvice Lakes worsened the overall situation in Croatia and led to an escalation of the conflict. Even though the Croatian and Serb forces were separated by the JNA at the Plitvice Lakes, the situation in the area continued to deteriorate following the clash. In nearby Plaški, Croatian police personnel left the local police station and were replaced by Serb officers. Both SAO Krajina and Croatian forces set up several roadblocks on the Saborsko–Lička Jasenica–Ogulin road. By summer, the blockades were extended to the north of Plaški and south of Saborsko, where Croatian authorities established another 30-strong police station on 2 April. Only JNA vehicles were permitted to pass the roadblocks, and that brought about a shortage of food, medicine and electricity in the area.

On 2 May, the Serb Democratic Party, the ruling party in the SAO Krajina, organised a protest march to the Plitvice Lakes and a political rally demanding the Croatian police withdraw from Plitvice. The march, led by Babić and Vojislav Šešelj, was prevented from reaching the Plitvice Lakes by the JNA and forced to return to Titova Korenica. The JNA imposed a blockade of the Plitvice Lakes police station on 1 July, on the pretext that the Croatian police had abducted and imprisoned two JNA officers. By 6 July, the SAO Krajina forces and the JNA commenced attacks on the Ljubovo Pass southeast of the Plitvice Lakes, on the Titova Korenica–Gospić road, driving the Croatian National Guard back and capturing the pass by the end of the month. Throughout the summer, the JNA continued to engage Croatian forces in Lika using the units deployed to the Plitvice Lakes in April. The fighting escalated further on 30 August, when the JNA captured the Plitvice Lakes police station and the following day when the Battle of Gospić began.

Jović is largely viewed in Croatia as the first casualty of the Croatian War of Independence. A monument dedicated to him was erected in his birthplace of Aržano in 1994. After the war, a monument was erected at the site of his death, where annual commemorations of the clash are held. The clash and Jović's death are commemorated annually at the Plitvice Lakes.

title: Plitvice Lakes incident


text:
Paoli station

Paoli station is a passenger rail station located in the western suburbs of Philadelphia at 13 Lancaster Avenue (US 30), Paoli, Pennsylvania. It is served by Amtrak's Keystone Service and Pennsylvanian trains, and most SEPTA Paoli/Thorndale Line trains.

The station has Amtrak and SEPTA ticket offices, a waiting room, vending machines, restrooms, and a coffee shop.

History
This one-story, tan brick building was constructed by the Pennsylvania Railroad in 1953 at a cost of $140,000; it replaced an earlier Victorian depot that was built in 1893.

It is 19.9 mi track from Philadelphia's Suburban Station. In 2017, the average total weekday SEPTA boardings at this station was 1,114 and the average total weekday SEPTA alightings was 1,136.

Paoli Intermodal Transportation Center Project
The Paoli Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) Project was proposed as a relocation and expansion of the Paoli station to a new site near the existing facility. Improvements in the plans for the new intermodal transportation center included a bridge over the rail tracks (Darby Road which will replace Valley Road), renovation or replacement of the existing station building, new passenger waiting and ticketing facilities, passenger amenities, bus, shuttle, passenger parking facilities, and potential new retail and commercial business development.

Construction for the first phase of the upgraded station commenced in February 2017. The first phase, which cost $48 million, made the station compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act by replacing the two low-level side platforms with a high-level island platform, constructing a pedestrian overpass over the tracks, and adding elevators and ramps. A ribbon-cutting ceremony for the first phase of the project was held on September 23, 2019, with Amtrak and SEPTA officials, disability rights groups, and area politicians in attendance. The second phase of the station project will replace the North Valley Road bridge. The third phase will turn the station into an intermodal transportation facility by constructing a high-level side platform adjacent to the outbound track, additional amenities for passengers, bus depot facilities, and a parking garage.

Other future plans
The canceled light rail Greenline would have connected Paoli station with the towns of Phoenixville and Oaks, Pennsylvania.

Station layout
Paoli has one center high-level island platform with an overpass allowing passengers to travel from the center platform to the ground level. Some SEPTA trains terminate/originate here. Originally, the station had four tracks, however the center tracks were removed in 2017 to allow for the construction of the center high-level platform.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Paoli station


text:
Talk:The Ticket That Exploded

My first article. Feel free to elaborate or correct any errors.

Dr Ellipso 12:26, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Electronic Revolution link
Why is there an External Link to the essay "Electronic Revolution" here? I don't see any connection to The Ticket That Exploded. If no connection can be made I'll move the link to the main William S. Burroughs article. If it happens to be part of the book, this needs to be noted. 23skidoo 13:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I just discovered that Electronic Revolution actually has its own article, so I moved the link there. 23skidoo 13:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:TicketThatExploded.jpg
Image:TicketThatExploded.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

What is this book about?
Simply quoting from the book's introduction does no good at all. Is there a plot? Who is Agent Lee? Why is this work considered notable? I came to this page because "language is a virus" redirected me here, but there is no reference at all to that. What is cut-up method? I can't really stand the cult of personality built up around Burroughs and his writing but I understand that he has many fans so I'd ask someone who cares about his work to attempt to fix these problems. Xenomorph erotica (talk) 15:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

 * To my recollection, there isn't an "introduction" to this book that would make useful quote material. The book is unusual in that the plot is largely left to the reader to determine, although there are obvious and strong themes of mind control and the idea of the influence of technology and language are explored in unusual ways.  These things are already mentioned in the article in as much as can be mentioned without going into original research territory.  Perhaps someone could add a bit about Agent Lee being a literary stand-in of sorts for Burroughs himself if one could find proper sources.  The cut up technique is linked in the article.  Just follow the link for a comprehensive article about this method.  I agree that the "language is a virus" concept could be further explored.  Maybe that is something that could be carefully added by someone with knowledge of good sources for such a thing.  To be frank, though, with an impressionistic and subjective work such as this book, it would be very difficult to elaborate without coloring the article with one's own opinions.  Most of your questions and confusion could be easily cleared up by taking a gander at this dense and baffling work of surrealism.  It's got less to do with a cult of personality and more to do with the difficulty and subjectivity of the material.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.231.42.109 (talk) 07:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * There are a couple editions of the book in the Internet Archive. I searched both for "virus" and could not find the phrase "language is a virus." Does the quote actually come from this book, or is that a myth? 198.255.136.88 (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:The Ticket That Exploded


text:
User talk:Stelian

Austrian School edits
Please correct your spelling. "Beginning".
 * Of course, sorry about that. Stelian (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stelian


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full Circle (band)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 01:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Full Circle (band)
Non-notable band. Al 12:29, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete. I almost flipped out before I realized I was thinking of A Perfect Circle.  -- Plutor 16:50, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete allmusic.com finds two so-named bands. Neither have any albums. Google is no help here, obviously, and we don't have the artists surnames so adding a name to the search isn't much good. They appear to have been writing their album for the last two years... -Splash 22:30, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of compliance with WP:Music. Indeed, when I clicked on the band website, this article is a direct copy of their about page so its a copyvio as well. Capitalistroadster 01:10, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Copyvio process completed. Capitalistroadster 01:45, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
UE Sant Andreu

Unió Esportiva Sant Andreu is a Catalan club based in the city of Barcelona in the district of Sant Andreu in Catalonia. Founded in 1909, it plays in, holding home matches at Camp Municipal Narcís Sala, with an all-seated capacity of 6,563. It disputes the Pla de Barcelona derby with CE Europa.

Club background

 * Club de Futbol Andreuenc (1909–25)
 * L'Avenç del Sport (1911–25)
 * Unió Esportiva Sant Andreu (1925–40)
 * Club Deportivo San Andrés (1940–79)
 * Unión Deportiva San Andrés (1979–80)
 * Unió Esportiva Sant Andreu (1980–current)

Season to season

 * 11 seasons in Segunda División
 * 19 seasons in Segunda División B
 * 1 season in Segunda Federación
 * 44 seasons in Tercera División
 * 2 seasons in Tercera Federación/Tercera División RFEF

Honours

 * Segunda División B: 1991–92
 * Tercera División: 1949–50, 1957–58, 1968–69, 1984–85, 1989–90
 * Copa Catalunya: 2008–09, 2018–19
 * Copa Federación: 2012–13
 * Catalan Second Division: 1919–20, 1920–21, 1939–40
 * Catalan Historical Teams Tournament: 2007

Former players
Note: this list includes players that have appeared in at least 100 league games and/or have reached international status, along with the position they played at.
 * 🇪🇸 Ramón Calderé (Midfielder)
 * 🇪🇸 Manuel Lanzarote (Midfielder)
 * 🇪🇸 Luso (Midfielder)
 * 🇪🇸 José Miguel Morales (Goalkeeper)
 * 🇦🇩 Ildefons Lima (Defender)

Former coaches

 * 🇪🇸 Domènec Balmanya
 * 🇪🇸 César Rodríguez
 * Jiří Sobotka

title: UE Sant Andreu


text:
User talk:Nixer

Archive1 Archive2 Archive3

Barnstar
Not sure where it should go on your page so here it is.--

Indefinite block
I was going to block you for meatpuppeting the 3RR violation on the Joseph Stalin page, but having seen your block log, it looks like indefinite is probably appropriate. User:Zoe|(talk) 07:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

You reverted to a version placed by a vandal who is adding excessively POV edits to the very few articles he/she has edited. You reverted without an explanation as to why you feel the POV should be in the article. A 3RR violation applies to every person who reverts the article, not just to the one account that does so. User:Zoe|(talk) 07:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This is your POV that he is a vandal. There are many users who reverted to that version, not only me. I reverted the mass deletion of sourced material. Please stop blocking your opponents.--Nixer 07:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I have been a harsh crytic of Nixer and I supported his blocks but indef is simply wrong here. He is not a sterile revert warrior. He contributes sourced content but occasionally does degrade to edit wars. Indef block seems an overkill. --Irpen 07:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

To a certain extent through heroic figures like Klaus Fuchs, the brilliant activities of the Soviet intelligence service resulted in the early loss of America's monopoly on the destructive atomic bomb. isn't vandalism? User:Zoe|(talk) 07:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Why is this vandalism?--SergeiXXX 06:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

 * This is a wrong accusation in sockpuppetry which I was not engaged in. User:Zoe simply blocked all his opponents (accusing all them to be sockpuppets). I did not broke any rule and made only one edit to revert mass deletion of material, added by various users (including me).--Nixer 07:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I never said you were a sockpuppet, I said you were a meatpuppet. This discussion is over.  User:Zoe|(talk) 07:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Nixer, better promise not to rv war and prey than present silly excuses. --Irpen 07:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Can you say one edit is an edit war? Yes, of course, I do not use socks, break 3RR etc. But I have right to revert to a version I like more (especially if my contribution deleted in the other version), at least once, especially when my edits supported by a majority of other users. And I am not a "meatpuppet" of any other user. Please use checkuser.--Nixer 07:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Don't be silly. Think it over. --Irpen 07:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I noticed this by chance. Nixer has put made many worthwhile contributions to many articles. While the use of words like "heroic" and "brilliant" is clearly inappropriate (i.e. they are peacock terms, I think an indefinite block is overly harsh. Grant65 | Talk 07:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I did not use these words. I simply restored version with my edits not deleted. I do not say this version is brilliant. I also ask to unblock User:Zvesda who was also blocked by User:Zoe in false accusation of being my "meatpuppet".--Nixer 07:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

 * You have been unblocked. I suggest you stay away from the article for a period of 24 hours. I also urge you to report this on WP:ANI. — Nearly Headless Nick  {L} 12:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Aqualendhes
Whatever possessed you to move Åland to Aqualendhes? J I P | Talk 09:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Block
I second Mike Rosoft's unblock review. --Yamla 16:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Where do you see vandal/attack accounts?--Nixer 12:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Antarctic Treaty secretariat Emblem.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Antarctic Treaty secretariat Emblem.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Antarctic_Treaty_secretariat_Emblem.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Antarctic_Treaty_secretariat_Emblem.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as or , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 18:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Probability control
I have added a "" template to the article Probability control, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. DavidCBryant 17:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Loc1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Loc1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 20:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have tagged Image:Trvn2.jpg and Image:Federation Tower1.jpg for the same reason. ShadowHalo 20:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:6449.jpg
You uploaded this image and tagged it with PD-release - which indicates you have the copyright holder's permission to release it. If this is the case you need to provide supporting evidence for this. If you took the photo you can change the license to PD-self and state that it is your own work in the image summary. Madmedea 09:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CMH.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CMH.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:6449.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:6449.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 00:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Aeroport_01.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aeroport_01.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Mian1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mian1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ba-i-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ba-i-1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alex Spade 11:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mos-GUM-interrior.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mos-GUM-interrior.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sebvdv 07:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tokamak15.gif
I have tagged Image:Tokamak15.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 19:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Uragan1m.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Uragan1m.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sempl 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sempl 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Schofield 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Schofield 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Venus-real color.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Venus-real color.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:BA3_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BA3_2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 16:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Ba-i-1.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ba-i-1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Odess.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Odess.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alex Spade (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Tpb.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tpb.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kjetil r (talk) 20:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sani8.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sani8.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eroad.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eroad.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ba-6 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ba-6 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ba27.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ba27.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Ba-6 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ba-6 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Ba27.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ba27.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:PPG.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PPG.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:08, 31 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kam Solusar (talk) 19:08, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:PPG.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PPG.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Chark1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chark1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mon2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mon2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nils Emil (talk) 11:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:S14 4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:S14 4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 23:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Comparative military ranks of World War II/temp1

The article Comparative military ranks of World War II/temp1 has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * It has been fully superseded by Comparative officer ranks of World War II. Annoyingly, when searching Wikipedia, I found this /temp1 page came up in priority to "Comparative officer ranks of World War II" - and discovered it had errors in it which do not appear in the master page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stephen Kirragetalk - contribs 17:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sk280.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sk280.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:01, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sk388.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sk388.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:02, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Mayak.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mayak.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Wintermoscow.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wintermoscow.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Borean languages for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borean languages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Borean languages until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eurasiatic (talk) 01:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:T90 3.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:T90 3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Colonization of Mercury for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colonization of Mercury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Colonization of Mercury& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 23:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mining of Ceres for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mining of Ceres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mining of Ceres until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A2soup (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Sempl 2.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sempl 2.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 21:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Sk302.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sk302.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sk328.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sk328.jpg, which you've attributed to http://moscowvision.ru/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sk345.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sk345.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sk225.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sk225.jpg, which you've attributed to http://moscowvision.ru/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sk55.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sk55.jpg, which you've attributed to http://moscowvision.ru/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Uragan1m.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Uragan1m.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Schofield 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Schofield 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nixer


text:
Edme-Jean Leclaire

Edme-Jean Leclaire (14 May 1801 – 13 July 1872) was a French economist and businessman. He developed an early system of employee profit-sharing.

Leclaire was born the son of a poor village shoemaker, in Aisy-sur-Armançon, a small village in the district of Tonnerre, department of Yonne in France. He was a successful contractor glazier-painter, employing from 60 to 80 workers. The Society of Providence and Mutual Aid of the workers and employees of the Leclaire Company, which he founded, was authorized by the French Minister of the Interior on 28 September 1838. Leclaire subsequently served as Mayor of the town of Herblay, a commune in the north-western suburbs of Paris, France.

The short-lived cooperative village of Leclaire in Madison County, Illinois, was founded by N. O. Nelson as a company town for the N. O. Nelson Manufacturing Company. The village was named in honor of Edme-Jean Leclaire. The village, which existed from 1890 to 1934, was operated based on some of Leclaire's principles.

title: Edme-Jean Leclaire


text:
Malvern station (SEPTA)

Malvern station is a SEPTA Regional Rail and a former Amtrak station in Malvern, Pennsylvania. Located at West King Road and North Warren Avenue, it serves most Paoli/Thorndale Line trains. Until 1998, some Keystone Service trains stopped here as well.

There are 323 parking spaces at the station for daily parking. This station is 21.8 track miles from Philadelphia's Suburban Station. In 2017, the average total weekday boardings at this station was 811, and the average total weekday alightings was 825. Malvern is also the western terminal of the line on Sundays.

History
The station was originally built in 1900 by the Pennsylvania Railroad. In 1968, it merged with its longtime rival New York Central Railroad to form the Penn Central Railroad. With railroad passenger service declining in the United States, passenger service was acquired by Amtrak in 1971 which ran Keystone and Keystone State Express trains. Penn Central continued to struggle to provide commuter service until it was acquired by Conrail in 1976, and SEPTA in 1983. SEPTA designated this as the R5 Paoli/Thorndale line.

In 2010 SEPTA began construction of a new passenger access tunnel along with handicap ramps and stairways to the platforms. The project included improved parking lots. SEPTA has received frequent criticism for spending $9.2 million to build the ramps because there is currently no way for a person in a wheelchair to get from the platform to the train. A person in a wheelchair, as of now, could only get from the parking lot to the station platform.

Station layout
Malvern has two low-level side platforms. Some SEPTA trains terminate/originate here.

title: Malvern station (SEPTA)


text:
Talk:Amphitheatre

Spelling Amphitheater/Amphitheatre
In the USA, the spelling "amphitheater" seems to predominate. (This seems to follow the German spelling.) The spelling "amphitheatre" appears to be the dominate spelling in the UK (following the French). The article should reflect the US spelling in some way. The spelling in the actual name of the article is another can of worms.

Why should it? It's not a US invention.

 * I agree that it is odd for the British spelling to be used here and with theater. Although the latter form is fairly commonly found in the US, the same cannot be said for amphitheater. What's the logic by which the British form is used here and not elsewhere? Eponymous-Archon (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Immediately after writing this, I realized that the convert function also uses British spellings for metric units, to wit, "kilometre".Eponymous-Archon (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Please see WP:ENGVAR. In short, Wikipedia articles can be written in any variety of English, and once chosen the variety should not be changed.  Sandstein   19:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Contemporary 'Amphitheatres'
Do we really need this section? So called modern 'amphitheatres' aren't amphitheatres at all - they aren't the same shape, are incosistant with the name, and they do not have the same function. Should we really be sanctioning the misuse of the term? 128.243.220.22 (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Do we really need this?
"In chariot racing,two types of chariots were used. The quadriga was a four-horse drawn chariot whereas a biga was a two-horse drawn chariot. There were also four colours of racers: red, green, blue, and white." Do we really need this? This article is about amphitheatres, NOT chariot racing. --C7796E2C 05:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleted chariot racing sentences. --C7796E2C 05:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Classical age
Where are the amphitheatres of classical Greece on this page? Starting with Rome seems like a big omission.

 * Good point. Please feel free to add info. olivier 07:38, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

 * But Greek theatres aren't amphitheatres; they're just theatres. An amphitheatre is one that's enclosed all the way round. Edbrims 07:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Images
What is the sense of showing images of theatres which are not amphitheatres? One of them was even labeled as amphitheatre! If no one gives a good reason for this images (which are at best confusing since someone may think they show amphitheatres) then I will remove them from this page --Enlil2 17:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Wrong images removed. --Enlil2 09:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Speaking of images, as wonderful as the Colliseum picture is, it isn't the best at illustrating what an ampitheter is. A nearly identical image also appears in the gallery towards the bottom.  Cacophony 05:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Outdoor Ampitheaters
Hi, I'm trying to help a friend with a college project and I was wondering if anyone had a list of outdoor ampitheaters built by the WPA program. If so can someone either post it or send me a link on my talk page. Thanks for the help!

Pronunciation
Am I the only one who says the 'ph' as if it's 'p'?Cameron Nedland 16:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Evidently not, because there's a redirect page set up from ampitheatre — a spelling that would seem plausible to someone who pronounces the word as you do. Do you say it that way for convenience, or is it an alternative approach to the Greek (thus giving "amp-hibian")? —142.206.2.11 14:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * ph is the latin transliteration for greek φ which was at that time spoken as an aspired p, i.e. p+h. The pronounciation of Greek has varied many times, now φ = f, which is btw nothing special since there are also alternations between p and f in other languages, e.g. semitic languages. Therefore, a pronounciation with p would be historically correct, but would sound a bit strange nowadays. --Enlil2 19:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I knew that (not to sound like a dick). But I do say am-'f'ib-i-an.Cameron Nedland 00:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, then you are just inconsistent ;-) --Enlil2 15:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Tell me about it :(Cameron Nedland 21:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.206.14.204 (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Half circular
The classic Greek amphitheatre is, to my knowledge, only half circular, and the romans might have thought of Colosseum as an amphitheatre, but it shurely is a derivation of the original.

Per Hafnar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perhn (talk • contribs) 00:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Open-air theatre: incorrect redirect!
hi. An open-air theatre is NOT the same as an amphitheatre, since normally it is of a semicircular shape, rather than a round or oval one, and has a stage at the lower front end, not a central arena. It corresponds to the shape of a Greek or Roman THEATRE, not AMPHItheatre. I don't know how to remove a redirect, I hope you a) agree and b) know how to undo it. Cheers, Arminden (talk) 03:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Apparently there are very rare cases where open-air theatres are indeed amphitheatre-shaped, such as here. It should be mentioned at "amphitheatre" (if it isn't already) that the popular use of the term is widespread and it confuses amphitheatre with any sloping auditorium more or less resembling an ancient theatre (w/o amphi-). But apart from that, "open-air theatre" doesn't fully belong with any of the existing articles, so plain, unqualified redirects are wrong. Is there any umbrella term to bundle them on and cross-reference, I don't know, maybe "public arena"? Arminden (talk) 23:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It looks like I was wrong, it's about the difference between ancient amphitheatres vs the modern use of the term, which does cover open-air theatres as well, as long as the seating is sloping. Made this more visible in the lead, matter almost closed, as one caveat remains: One can have a flat open air theatre with a raised stage instead of sloping seating, like a drive-in movie theatre or an improvised theatre in a park for instance, which would still not belong here. Arminden (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Big enough & suitable for chariot racing?
Were amphitheatres really suitable venues for chariot races? Thinking of length, turning radius, and starting-gates & boxes. Maybe only such a huge one as the Colosseum, but if there were only 1-2-3 exceptionally large amphitheatres capable of it, then it's hardly worth mentioning. Arminden (talk) 04:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I've removed that claim for this reason. None of the sources cited seem to support the "amphitheatres were used for chariot racing" thing; even if it sometimes happened that wasn't the primary function Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Main source not at Google Books, apparently misquoted
hi. Bomgardner's book is quoted from the 2000 edition (Routledge, ISBN: 0415165938, 276 pages), which has no preview at Google Books. The 2002 edition ("Psychology Press" = also Routledge, ISBN: 0415301858, ALSO 276 pages, reprint), does have snippet view at Google Books. I doubt the two differ in content (basically the same publisher, same number of pages, "reprint"). On page 37 of the 2002 reprint, probably identical to p. 37 of the 2000 edition cited at footnote 8 (now 9, after my addition), there is NOTHING even remotely related to what it is supposed to say. Also, that footnote is set at the end of a long, multi-sentence paragraph, which makes is hard to know if it was even meant to cover the entire paragraph, or just the last sentence. As of now, the entire paragraph, from "Ancient Roman amphitheatres were major..." to " designed for athletics and footraces.", is as good as unsourced. It contains what I placed in the topic above this one, the dubious claim that amphitheatres were used regularly for chariot races, which seems wrong. This makes it perfectly clear why it's important that we have an accessible source quoted after each and every sentence.

The next three footnotes (Bomgardner p. 59, 62, 201–223) are not available to me today on Google Books, but should be checked for similar problems, as this is the foundation of the entire article. Arminden (talk) 03:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Modern/contemporary amphitheatres back in, but needs a lot of reworking
We have 3 types in the lead (ancient, modern, natural), but only 2 elaborated in the article in dedicated sections. The section on modern/contemporary amphitheatres was thrown out from the article w/o explanation by anonymous editor in 2018 (see here); I've put it back in. Of course it should be updated, sourced, processed, etc. Arminden (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Amphitheatre


text:
Bertya

Bertya is a genus of plants in the family Euphorbiaceae first described as a genus in 1845. The entire genus is endemic to Australia.

• # Bertya brownii S.Moore - New South Wales
 * Species

• # Bertya calycina Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - S Queensland

• # Bertya cunninghamii Planch. - Queensland, NSW, Victoria

• # Bertya dimerostigma F.Muell. - Austin + Coolgardie in Western Australia

• # Bertya ernestiana Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - S Queensland

• # Bertya findlayi F.Muell. - S NSW, N Victoria

• # Bertya glandulosa Grüning - S Queensland

• # Bertya grampiana Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - W Victoria

• # Bertya granitica Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - S Queensland

• # Bertya gummifera Planch. - NSW

• # Bertya ingramii T.A.James - Northern Tablelands of NSW

• # Bertya lapicola Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - Queensland

• # Bertya linearifolia Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - NSW

• # Bertya mollissima Blakely - NSW

• # Bertya oblonga Blakely - NSW

• # Bertya oleifolia Planch. - NSW, Queensland

• # Bertya opponens (F.Muell. ex Benth.) Guymer - Leichhardt + Maranoa in Queensland

• # Bertya pedicellata F.Muell. - Queensland

• # Bertya pinifolia Planch. - Boonah District in Queensland

• # Bertya polystigma Grüning - NE Queensland

• # Bertya pomaderrioides F.Muell. - NSW

• # Bertya recurvata Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - S Queensland

• # Bertya riparia Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - Southern Tablelands of NSW

• # Bertya rosmarinifolia Planch. - NSW, S Queensland

• # Bertya rotundifolia F.Muell. - Kangaroo I

• # Bertya sharpeana Guymer - Queensland

• # Bertya tasmanica (Sond. & F.Muell.) Müll.Arg. - NSW, Tasmania, South Australia

• # Bertya virgata (Ewart) Halford & R.J.F.Hend. - S Western Australia

moved to Ricinocarpos • # B. andrewsii - Ricinocarpos stylosus
 * formerly included

• # B. gummifera var. psiloclada - Ricinocarpos psilocladus

• # B. psiloclada - Ricinocarpos psilocladus

• # B. quadrisepala - Ricinocarpos muricatus

title: Bertya


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Problem-Reaction-Solution

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 01:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Problem-Reaction-Solution
WP:ISNOT a how-to, especially for stuff like this. --Ryan Delaney talk 12:36, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete this crap. --RoySmith 12:58, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Problem: This. Reaction: WTF??  Solution: Delete. --Apyule 13:12, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - If this were funnier, it would be funny, like Apyule. --Tysto 16:12, 2005 August 23 (UTC)
 * I've hunted around to see whether this is a widely known psychological idea/theory/etc., but drawn a blank. Unless someone's got better proof than this article (that the idea is a widely accepted in psychology) delete. Sliggy 16:45, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research :-) --DrTorstenHenning 17:33, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No. Just...no. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 17:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Shimmy-Disc

Hyphen?
I believe that the name should be spelled with a hyphen -- Shimmy-Disc. I will check on some actual records to see.--Larrybob 23:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Nope my father Mike Macioce, (friend of Kramer, and briefly cover photographer) told me there was no hyphen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27th infantry

Had the experiece of recording at the Shimmy-Disc studios back in 1994. Kramer was the producer on four songs for us. Will try to dig up some pictures from the experience.

this article sucks, it's all about GWAR and not at all about SHimmy Disc the label.. needs MAJOR work —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.55.67.24 (talk) 05:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:Shimmy-Disc


text:
McKellar, Australian Capital Territory

McKellar is a residential suburb in the Belconnen district of Canberra, located within the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. The suburb is named after Colin McKellar who was Minister for Repatriation from 1964 to 1970. The suburb name was gazetted on 15 January 1974. The streets of McKellar are named for journalists with the main street of the suburb called Dumas Street. McKellar is bounded by Ginninderra Drive, William Webb Drive, Owen Dixon Drive, and Gundaroo Drive.

Suburb features
McKellar features the McKellar Oval in the centre of the suburb, known as William Palmer Park, and has panoramic prospect from Mount Ainslie to Black Mountain and Mount Majura.

A small football stadium known as McKellar Park, and club are in the north east of the suburb. The McKellar shopping centre closed in 2012 and was later demolished, with only a single smaller commercial building remaining. McKellar Preschool closed in 2006, with the building later reopened as a privately run childcare centre.

Transport
McKellar is serviced by the ACTION bus network along Dumas Street and William Webb Drive. Route 43 travels along Dumas Street to Belconnen Interchange while route 24 travels along William Webb Drive to Belconnen Interchange.

Political representation
For the purposes of Australian federal elections for the House of Representatives, McKellar is in the Division of Fenner.

For the purposes of Australian Capital Territory elections for the ACT Legislative Assembly, McKellar is in the Ginninderra electorate.

Geology
A porphyry of Green-grey Dacitic intrusive containing large white feldspar crystals is found in most of McKellar. This is intruded by a band of Glebe Farm Adamellite through the south.

title: McKellar, Australian Capital Territory


text:
User talk:Pravs

I thought I would just start my talk here. I'll comeback and write something.

For the time being visit my 'own' (wordpress)blog

Gopal V
Another user has placed a tag on the article Gopal V, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. He did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person but it does not indicate how or why that person is notable. If the person really is notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly to indicate why, and also put a note on Talk:Gopal V. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

--Pamri • Talk • [ Reply] 06:53, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

An evening with Jimmy Wales
Hi "P", it was inspiring to be with you all on the evening of 29th September 2006 during the event,An evening with Jimmy Wales. Indeed, it was a wonderful experience for me. Regards. --Bhadani 13:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

The lighted path
Hi. Do you know about Diwali? I wish you All The Best on the ocasion of the Indian festival of light, Diwali. I am sure that the light of hope, confidence, and all positive attributes shall always remain inside you – lighting your path and guiding you to attain higher and higher levels of excellence in all your endevours! And, ID Mubarak too. All the best! --Bhadani 17:11, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Need help with Blathur
Hi Pravin,

I need some help with the Blathur page. It needs cleanup, and I'm not very familiar with the editing for indian villages, especially places to find information. Plus, there is no official record of any Blathur in the census or govt data. I dont know whether to move it to another page (like Kalliad) or what else to do. Could you help me with this if possible. Thanks a ton. Cheers. T/@ Sniperz11 editssign 00:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi there...
Hi there, I am Tinu Cherian, another malayali wikipedian from bangalore. Happened to read this too. Ping back ! --  Tinu  Cherian  - 14:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Prvaeen, you may want to see this : Meetup/Bangalore/Bangalore3 --  Tinu  Cherian  - 09:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia WikMeetup Bangalore 8
WikMeetup 8 Bangalore is scheduled for Sunday, 20 Dec, 2009 3:00 PM - 5:30 PM. Please ping me if you require any more information. Hoping to meet you on the meetup day. Take care --  Tinu  Cherian  - 11:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pravs