text:
User talk:JonBradbury

Welcome
Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 15:01, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

WikiProject A-League
Hi, I noticed you've contributed to pages related to the A-League competition - I started a WikiProject for it, and thought you might be interested in participating. Thanks! AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 05:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FDEp16-TheOpposition.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:FDEp16-TheOpposition.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FDEp17-TheIssues.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:FDEp17-TheIssues.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FDEp204-TheImageProblem.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:FDEp204-TheImageProblem.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FDEp205-TheMiracle.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:FDEp205-TheMiracle.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP206.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP206.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP201.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP201.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP202.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP202.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP203.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP203.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP204.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP204.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP205.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP205.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP206.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP206.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP207.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP207.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP208.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP208.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP209.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP209.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP210.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP210.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP211.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP211.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP212.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP212.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EurekaEP213.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:EurekaEP213.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

CONCACAF MERGE
Hi, thanks for responding to my discussion post regarding merging the CONCACAF champions cup and the champions league. I didn't know how to go about suggesting the merge to others. Oh and this is the same user, I posted the merge topic without logging in so it just showed my IP address (216.211.102.162), just so you dont get confused. Thanks again and hopefully we're able to merge them. Ciao   --Muppeteer (talk) 02:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello
I want to talk with you about something. Please contact me >> my tr-wikipedia profil: tr:User:Nazif_İLBEK or e-mail in my profil. —Preceding undated comment added 14:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Damani Dada

The article Damani Dada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Source searches indicate that multiple independent, reliable sources have not given this company in-depth, significant coverage and it therefore fails both the corporate and general notability guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  SITH   (talk)   12:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:JonBradbury


text: Category:Business opportunities

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Category:Business opportunities


text:
User talk:Elite compact

Welcome
Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 15:02, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

User Zionist Template
Can you please change it back to how it was previously? For whatever reason, there is no mention of me having created the template. Second, your revision somehow delinked the Zionist Wikipedians category that had been created for it? Thanks.--Michaelk 19:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I didn't really change the Zionist template- I recreated it. Someone had earased the template, so I decided to "bring it back". You are most welcomed to change it to what it was before. Elite compact 23:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Bastards... Well, thanks for maintaining it then. We need to find a new logo for it, since apparently the one that was used before isn't allowed per some stupid rules. --Michaelk 01:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I think the problem is that the logo of the WZO can't be used... but if you change it to the flag\coat of arms of Israel, there shouldn't be any problem. You have my support, anyway :) Elite compact 09:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject South Park
I have thought of creating a WikiProject for South Park since it is now near its' 10th anniversary and has more articles than ever. I feel we could all do the following things through this project: I have seen your South Park fan template and wondered if you were interested in joining. If so reply to my talk page and I'll get back to you as quick as I can. Thanks, Mr. Garrison
 * Cleanup any short/poorly written/unformatted articles
 * Merge/lengthen the many character articles
 * Improve the South Park main page

Unspecified source for Image:150px-Tag shfifonN.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:150px-Tag shfifonN.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaKBOT 15:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:13302.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:13302.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaKBOT 15:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Erdinast, Ben-Nathan & Co.
A template has been added to the article Erdinast, Ben-Nathan & Co., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. -- Y not? 07:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:39411739.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:39411739.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 10:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Apmlogo.JPG
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Apmlogo.JPG. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Aravabrigade.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Aravabrigade.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bank hapoalim en.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bank hapoalim en.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Basmakh-badge.png
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Basmakh-badge.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 14:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bdologo.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bdologo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bgalogo.JPG
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bgalogo.JPG. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bislat.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bislat.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:GivUnit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GivUnit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Hiszio.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Hiszio.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 17:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Lehilogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lehilogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lotem.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lotem.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Gkhlogo.JPG)
You've uploaded File:Gkhlogo.JPG, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 15:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yehuda Raveh & Co.

A tag has been placed on Yehuda Raveh & Co. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Sreifa (talk) 06:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of M. Seligman & Co.
Hello, Elite compact, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, M. Seligman & Co., for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Mt king  (edits)  08:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Naschitz Brandes & Co.

The article Naschitz Brandes & Co. has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king  (edits)  08:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yehuda Raveh & Co.

A tag has been placed on Yehuda Raveh & Co. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mt king  (edits)  08:50, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of M. Seligman & Co. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. Seligman & Co. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/M. Seligman & Co. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king  (edits)  23:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yehuda Raveh & Co.

The article Yehuda Raveh & Co. has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king  (edits)  23:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nblogo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Nblogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Shibolethlogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shibolethlogo.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Gad Naschitz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Gad Naschitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter Gad Naschitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Shiboleth, Yisraeli, Roberts, Zisman and Moshe H. Ne'eman, Ben-Artzi & Co. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiboleth, Yisraeli, Roberts, Zisman and Moshe H. Ne'eman, Ben-Artzi & Co. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shiboleth, Yisraeli, Roberts, Zisman and Moshe H. Ne'eman, Ben-Artzi & Co. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RJFJR (talk) 05:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meitarlogo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Meitarlogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Arnonlogo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Arnonlogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nahal2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nahal2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FalconK (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co.

The article Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Run of the mill law firm. Cannot find sources to indicate WP:CORP is met."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 13:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of M. Firon & Co. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. Firon & Co. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/M. Firon & Co. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elite compact


text: Habile

title: Habile


text:
Dihai-kutchin

Di'haii Gwich'in (translation: "Gwich'in living the farthest away" or "those living farthest downstream") are a small Gwichʼin tribe of the Athabaskan linguistic stock. Descendants intermarried with the Neets'aii Gwich'in in Arctic Village, Alaska, USA. Historically they have occupied the north fork of the Chandalar River, and the Middle and South Forks of the Koyukuk River.

title: Dihai-kutchin


text:
Johnson Boat Works

Johnson Boat Works was a builder and developer of racing sailboats of the scow design in White Bear Lake, Minnesota. It was founded in 1896, by John O. Johnson who had emigrated from Norway in 1893. After working with Gus Amundson for three years, Johnson started his own boat-building business in 1896. His first major success was the "Minnezika" a 38 ft scow design which won the championship on White Bear Lake in 1900. This sailboat was the beginning of the A-Class. As more classes were founded, Johnson moved on to B's, C's, D's, and E's.

Johnson was commissioned to build the 16 ft X-Boat for youth in the 1930s. Johnson designed the J-Scow in the mid-1950s which was converted to the MC. Through the years, the boat builder built Optis and 420s. In 1994, the builder brought out the Johnson 18. In 1998, two years after JBW turned 100 years old, the family sold the company. The scow molds were sold to their competitor Melges Boat Works (now called Melges Performance Sailboats) in Wisconsin. The other molds, including the Johnson 18 mold, were sold to Catalina Yachts in California. The repair and storage part of the company was sold to a family member who renamed the company White Bear Boat Works.

title: Johnson Boat Works


text:
Talk:Playoff Bowl

Packers agenda
I believe this paragraph should be modified or removed:
 * Using the Playoff Bowl (and loss) as motivation in 1965, the Packers won the first of three consecutive NFL championships from (1965-67. As of 2007, the Packers are the only NFL team ever to achieve this "three-peat" in the post-season era (which began in 1933). During this successful run, the Packers also won the first two Super Bowls in convincing fashion. In an ironic twist, Lombardi's final game (and victory) as head coach of the Packers was Super Bowl II, played in "hinky-dink" Miami's Orange Bowl in January 1968.

It is interesting and true, but this POV seems to take the spotlight off of the article's topic (The Playoff Bowl) and instead directs the reader's attention to the non-Playoff Bowl accomplishments of the Packers, which are well-documented elsewhere.--Son of Somebody 18:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ya think? Wahkeenah 00:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup!--Son of Somebody 16:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Then it's time for a "trim". Gopher it. Wahkeenah 18:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pbbelllogo.jpg
Image:Pbbelllogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Recent article regarding the Playoff Bowl
I reaad an article on Mental Floss written by Alex Watt titled "The NFL Used to Play a Thrid Place Game, a "Losers' Bowl for Losers." The article actually cites the data used on the Playoff Bowl page, so I thought it was worth adding it as a citation.  Comatmebro  ~Come at me~ 20:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 03:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Playoff Bowl


text: User:Ethan lowter

title: User:Ethan lowter


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places where driving while talking on a mobile phone is illegal

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. brenneman (t) (c) 00:52, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

List of places where driving while talking on a mobile phone is illegal
Hopelessly unmaintainable list. Rob Church Talk 15:06, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Another inane list. --Phroziac (talk) 15:08, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, hopelessly unmaintainable. Alphax τεχ 15:10, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * weak Keep I don't see this breaking any rules and it could be useful --Quasipalm 15:55, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not encyclopedic --Joelito 16:06, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is silly. Pilatus 16:09, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into Mobile Phone subsection Driving controversy --Grcampbell 16:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment As of now, redirecting to subsections is not possible, afaik.  ral  315  17:21, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I talked about merging the details with Mobile_Phone#Driving_controversy, not redirecting, though that could also be ok... --Grcampbell 18:19, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, failing that merge as above. I think having a detailed list would clutter that page too much. Kappa 16:38, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no need to merge or redirect.  ral  315  17:21, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, merging would be fine. Trollderella 17:42, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons cited above. Dottore So 17:45, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Grcampbell. --Idont Havaname 19:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Grcampbell or just keep. The main charge here is unmaintainability. But it is eminently maintainable: there are only a couple hundred countries in the world (at any given time), and in most of those, there's no explicit law against mobile-phoning-while-driving. That said, it would be better in context in the main article in its present state and could be spun out if it gets long. -Splash 19:35, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hopelessly unmaintainable. In the States, AFAIK, laws like this can be as small as town-to-town. Any notable national/international trends should be reported on the in "mobile phone" article. Sdedeo 20:03, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge tiny lists where reasonable. Christopher Parham (talk) 20:13, 2005 August 29 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unmaintainable. ManoaChild 20:39, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment:I would suggest that merging is a mistake. This list will be huge if people start adding to it. Huge. Thus, it will need to be split off into a seperate article soon enough anyway. If it isn't kept seperately, it shouldn't be kept at all.--Scimitar parley 20:59, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unmaintainable and not encyclopedic. Groeck 21:22, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to any article thought suitable. Perfectly encyclopedic and I can't imagine why it would be thought to be remotely unmaintainable; the criteria are clear--that there should be a statute against operating a mobile phone while driving in some circumstances within a jurisdiction.  The appropriate section of Mobile phone, as suggested, would be okay. --Tony Sidaway Talk  21:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Lists suck. Jachin 22:30, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep (or merge) lists do normally suck, but actually this one is quite informative. Frankly, Sdedeo the fact that the US does not choose to have a nation-wide law on the issue isn't a reason to delete a list of info about the rest of the world --Doc (?) 23:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Grcampbell - Mike "Mig" 23:38, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, could be useful. Andrew pmk | Talk 01:00, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Useful and topical list. Needs a better title, though. 23skidoo 05:51, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, silly list. Radiant_ >|< 08:47, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * RENAME and REWORK Define place??? Municipalities is no good, since there are too many. Roodog2k 01:00, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Lapinmies 23:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:XHTML Friends Network

Semantic web query
isn't this similar to semantic web?
 * It contributes to the Semantic web, but is only complementary, it does not replace the Semantic Web. --Vincent 10:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Criticisms of XFN
I think this article should have a section on criticisms of XFN.

Examples

copyright violation?
The introduction section looks like it was copied verbatim from http://gmpg.org/xfn/intro — deathlime 10:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

microformat?
I couldn't find a single mention of the word "microformat" on the XFN homepage, although XFN obviously is a microformat. Why don't they use that term? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)

I think the link to the irc channel should be removed, I entered and no one was there, only me. I also think that some examples should be added like mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.127.76.139 (talk) 21:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

WordPress?
I don't know enough about it, but I am sure WordPress uses XFN in their 'links' section in the software. Should this be mentioned as an important implementation (millions of blogs worldwide)? Blonkm (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:XHTML Friends Network


text: Talk:Third driver

title: Talk:Third driver


text:
Mazgaon Fort

The Mazagaon Fort was a British fort in Mazagaon, Bombay (present-day Mumbai), in the Indian state of Maharashtra, built around 1680. The fort was razed by the Muslim Koli general, Yakut Khan in June 1690. The fort was located at the present-day Joseph Baptista Gardens, atop Bhandarwada Hill outside the Dockyard Road railway station.

History
Up to the eighteenth century, Bombay consisted of several small islands. In 1661, seven of these islands were ceded by the Portuguese to the British as part of the dowry of Catherine of Braganza when she married Charles II of England. The harbour proved eminently apposite, and the British planned to shift their base from Surat. The Siddis, who were of African descent and noted for their navies, had allied themselves with the Mughals. The British, through the East India Company, and the Mughals were constantly waging war on each other. As allies of the Mughals, the Siddis also viewed the British as enemies.

Faced with relentless attacks by the Siddis in 1672, The British constructed several fortifications in the area, and in 1680 the Sewri fort was complete. It stood on the island of Mazagaon, on a hill overlooking the eastern seaboard.

In 1689, the Siddi general, Yakut Khan, with an army of 20,000 men, invaded Bombay. The fleet first captured the Sewri Fort, then the Mazagon Fort, before sacking the town of Mahim. In April 1689, the Siddis laid siege to the British fortification to the south. The British governor Sir John Child appealed to the Mughal Aurangzeb to reign in Sakat for a price. In February 1690, the Mughal emperor agreed, on the conditions that rupees 1.5 lakhs (150,000) (over one billion USD at 2008 conversion rates) be paid, and Child be sacked. Child's untimely death in 1690, however, resulted in his escaping the ignominy of being sacked.

Enraged at barter, Sakat withdrew his forces on 8 June 1690, after razing the Mazagaon Fort.

In 1884, the British developed Bhandarwada Hill as a major water reservoir. It supplies water to South and Central Mumbai. A popular recreation ground, the ground is named after Joseph Baptista, a freedom fighter and close aide of the Indian freedom movement activist, Bal Gangadhar Tilak.

title: Mazgaon Fort


text:
Hannoversches Straßenbahn Museum

Hannoversches Straßenbahn-Museum or Hanover Tramway Museum comprises a collection of tramcars from all over Germany, and is located on the site of a former potash mine in Sehnde, southeast of the city of Hanover.

title: Hannoversches Straßenbahn Museum


text:
Geon (physics)

In general relativity, a geon is a nonsingular electromagnetic or gravitational wave which is held together in a confined region by the gravitational attraction of its own field energy. They were first investigated theoretically in 1955 by J. A. Wheeler, who coined the term as a contraction of "gravitational electromagnetic entity".

Overview
Since general relativity is a classical field theory, Wheeler's concept of a geon does not treat them as quantum-mechanical entities, and this generally remains true today. Nonetheless, Wheeler speculated that there might be a relationship between geons and elementary particles. This idea continues to attract some attention among physicists, but in the absence of a viable theory of quantum gravity, the accuracy of this speculative idea cannot be tested.

Wheeler did not present explicit geon solutions to the vacuum Einstein field equation, a gap which was partially filled by Brill and Hartle in 1964 by the Brill–Hartle geon. In 1997, Anderson and Brill gave a rigorous proof that geon solutions of the vacuum Einstein equation exist, though they are not given in a simple closed form.

A major outstanding question regarding geons is whether they are stable, or must decay over time as the energy of the wave gradually "leaks" away. This question has not yet been definitively answered, but the consensus seems to be that they probably cannot be stable. This would lay to rest Wheeler's initial hope that a geon might serve as a classical model for stable elementary particles. However, this would not rule out the possibility that geons are stabilized by quantum effects. In fact, a quantum generalization of the gravitational geon using low-energy quantum gravity shows that geons are stable systems even when quantum effects are turned on. The quantum geon (called "graviball") is described as gravitons bound by their gravitational self-interaction. Since geons (classical or quantum) have a mass but are electromagnetically neutral, they are possible candidates for dark matter.

title: Geon (physics)


text:
Cycloconverter

A cycloconverter (CCV) or a cycloinverter converts a constant amplitude, constant frequency AC waveform to another AC waveform of a lower frequency by synthesizing the output waveform from segments of the AC supply without an intermediate DC link ( and ). There are two main types of CCVs, circulating current type or blocking mode type, most commercial high power products being of the blocking mode type.

Characteristics
Whereas phase-controlled semiconductor controlled rectifier devices (SCR) can be used throughout the range of CCVs, low cost, low-power TRIAC-based CCVs are inherently reserved for resistive load applications. The amplitude and frequency of converters' output voltage are both variable. The output to input frequency ratio of a three-phase CCV must be less than about one-third for circulating current mode CCVs or one-half for blocking mode CCVs. Output waveform quality improves as the pulse number of switching-device bridges in phase-shifted configuration increases in CCV's input. In general, CCVs can be with 1-phase/1-phase, 3-phase/1-phase and 3-phase/3-phase input/output configurations, most applications however being 3-phase/3-phase.

Applications
The competitive power rating span of standardized CCVs ranges from few megawatts up to many tens of megawatts. CCVs are used for driving mine hoists, rolling mill main motors, ball mills for ore processing, cement kilns, ship propulsion systems, slip power recovery wound-rotor induction motors (i.e., Scherbius drives) and aircraft 400 Hz power generation. The variable-frequency output of a cycloconverter can be reduced essentially to zero. This means that very large motors can be started on full load at very slow revolutions, and brought gradually up to full speed. This is invaluable with, for example, ball mills, allowing starting with a full load rather than the alternative of having to start the mill with an empty barrel then progressively load it to full capacity. A fully loaded "hard start" for such equipment would essentially be applying full power to a stalled motor. Variable speed and reversing are essential to processes such as hot-rolling steel mills. Previously, SCR-controlled DC motors were used, needing regular brush/commutator servicing and delivering lower efficiency. Cycloconverter-driven synchronous motors need less maintenance and give greater reliability and efficiency. Single-phase bridge CCVs have also been used extensively in electric traction applications to for example produce 25 Hz power in the U.S. and 16 2/3 Hz power in Europe.

Whereas phase-controlled converters including CCVs are gradually being replaced by faster PWM self-controlled converters based on IGBT, GTO, IGCT and other switching devices, these older classical converters are still used at the higher end of the power rating range of these applications.

Harmonics
CCV operation creates current and voltage harmonics on the CCV's input and output. AC line harmonics are created on CCV's input accordance to the equation, where
 * $f_{h} = f_{1} ( k q ±1) ± 6 n f_{o}$ = harmonic frequency imposed on the AC line
 * $f_{h}$ and $k$ = integers
 * $n$ = pulse number (6, 12 . . .)
 * $q$ = output frequency of the CCV
 * Equation's 1st term represents the pulse number converter harmonic components starting with six-pulse configuration
 * Equation's 2nd term denotes the converter's sideband characteristic frequencies including associated interharmonics and subharmonics.

title: Cycloconverter


text:
Talk:Black Pullet

I have added a new version of the article with my own wording, also I did further research on the net to try to find viable sources and information regarding the book. Of course I will attempt to continue my search for more articles or sources that apply to this notable book - I do not wish to see this article be deleted.

Note:

 * 1 all terms in quotation marks are direct quotes from the book itself.
 * 2 I re-wrote the article and added my own knowledge of the book from reading it.
 * 3 Feel free to edit or apply changes according to whatever you believe is correct.

Piecraft 15:08, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Black Pullet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060406125932/http://altreligion.about.com:80/library/weekly/aa010403a.htm to http://altreligion.about.com/library/weekly/aa010403a.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051105165948/http://www.library.usyd.edu.au:80/libraries/rare/witchcraft/spellbooks.html to http://www.library.usyd.edu.au/libraries/rare/witchcraft/spellbooks.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Black Pullet


text:
Talk:Initial

Drop cap
"Drop cap" redirects here. Are they synonyms or is there a difference? -- Tarquin 15:11, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

 * The terms tend to be used synonymously, but I think they are slightly different things, if you want to be picky. An initial cap means any kind of large initial letter, including a drop cap, whereas I think a drop cap is a more specific kind of initial cap (probably the most common kind) that drops below the baseline of the text that follows on? So initial cap is the more general term? 82.71.0.229 (talk) 10:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Longest ever delay between between query and answer? Thanks anyway! Johnbod (talk) 11:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Self-reference
There is no reason for the example text to begin with a sentence about Wikipedia... wouldn't Lorem ipsum suffice? ~ Booya Bazooka 03:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * From : "For some reason, writers always seem to start paragraphs with an 'I' or a 'T,' rectilinear letters which don't add much to a page and can get repetitious in a hurry." Presumably, the same holds for L.  Neon    Merlin   14:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I removed the self reference: . It does look strange though because of the link. Perhaps the text should start with "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"? PleaseStand (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Merge
It doesn't seem a good idea to me. Historiated could not be placed very prominently in Initial, and can be hugely expanded. Johnbod (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

HTML and Initial
Most of the hints to HTML in this page refer to blatantly bad advice. Tables as a layout device is an abuse and has been deprecated for years; also, there's no need to make the capital float. CSS3 offers a first-line and a first-letter pseudo-elements, that are fully supported in Opera, Safari and Firefox, but not in IE7 (I don't know about IE8). The correct HTML/CSS markup and style is a clean markup (in fact, the first letter has no special semantic value) and the use of said pseudo-elements in the stylesheet.

If nobody has anything to say about this, I'll go and edit the page, as I think it is highly "mis-educational" for web developers. Sk (talk) 14:58, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Ornamental Alphabet - 16th Century.svg to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Ornamental Alphabet - 16th Century.svg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 5, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-10-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks!  howcheng  {chat} 23:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

In non-Latin scripts?
Are or were initials used in non-Latin scripts as well? I think I've seen them at least in a Greek bible once, but it would be nice if somebody with more knowledge could add some info on this. -- 77.7.148.124 (talk) 18:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Not merely decorative
Don't have time to edit the article but would greatly appreciate some info about the purpose of drop caps in modern publications. They don't just decorate (as this article implies); they also communicate: they serve as a focus for the eye and help the reader to zoom in on the start of the body text. For me, this article is overly skewed towards historical uses and illuminated manuscripts where that idea of focusing the reader's attention is lost or confused, so a separate section on this might be good? 82.71.0.229 (talk) 10:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Can we start this article with a drop capital?
It would be very fitting for this article, would it not? --31.205.88.138 (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Initial as in John "F." Kennedy?
That term middle initial redirects to middle name, but there is not a word about it there. In America, at least, people often ask Does that person use an initial, to which could be added '', like John. F. Kennedy?''. Wouldn't it be a good idea to explain clearly what that "F." is. ''What's that "F." in John F. Kennedy called, what's the term for it? Who knows? Wikipedia doesn't.'' Major flaw here. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Middle name has " In the U.S., the "middle name" is often abbreviated to the middle initial (e.g. Mary Lee Bianchi becomes Mary L. Bianchi).[5] This is usually standard for signatures[citation needed] or omitted entirely in everyday use (e.g. just Mary Bianchi). An individual may have more than one middle name, or none. In the United Kingdom, for comparison, she would usually be referred to as either Mary Bianchi, M. L. Bianchi or Mary Lee Bianchi, or she may choose Lee Bianchi, and informally there may be familiar shortenings." Seems almost enough. I'll move this section to the proper place. Something could be added here, and at Initial (disambiguation) - this page is about initials on pages. Johnbod (talk) 14:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry I missed it there, wading through just about everything to try to find something. Great if you add something here. We are not all typesetters or experts on that subject.--SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * PS Could you please try to cover J. Edgar Hoover, etc also? Not all initials (U.S. very common lingo) are in the middle. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It already has "(header) Middle name as primary name (text) In the United States, those who choose to be known primarily by their middle name may abbreviate their first name as an initial, e.g. J. Edgar Hoover (John Edgar Hoover)." Not in the same place, I admit. I think the "see also" you've added is the way to go here. I'll add to the disam.  Johnbod (talk) 15:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Initial


text:
Robert Jubelirer

Robert C. Jubelirer (born February 9, 1937, Altoona, Pennsylvania) is a Republican political leader in Pennsylvania. He served as a member of the Pennsylvania State Senate from 1975 to 2006. He served as President pro tempore of the Pennsylvania State Senate for all but two years from 1984 to 2006, and served as the 29th lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania between 2001 and 2003.

Jubelirer was defeated for re-nomination in the 2006 Republican party primary election and left office on November 30, 2006.

Early life
The son of a prominent county judge, Jubelirer attended Pennsylvania State University and the Dickinson School of Law. He was admitted to the bar in Blair County, Pennsylvania and practiced law for several years before entering politics.

He was elected to the Pennsylvania State Senate in 1974 to represent the Altoona area. He was elected Majority Leader in 1981. Jubelirer served as President Pro Tempore of the Senate from 1985 to 1992. After serving briefly as Minority Leader from 1992 to 1994, he again became President Pro Tempore.

In a 2002 PoliticsPA Feature story designating politicians with yearbook superlatives, he was named the "Hardest Working."

Lieutenant governor
When Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge resigned on October 5, 2001 to become President Bush's Homeland Security Advisor, Lt. Governor Mark Schweiker ascended to the governorship.

By provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1968, Jubelirer as President Pro Tempore was automatically elevated to Lt. Governor and sworn in the same day. Jubelirer's elevation to the office was not without controversy, as he retained his position in the Pennsylvania State Senate. Critics and political foes argued that this violated the separation of powers principle and threatened the checks and balances guaranteed in the state constitution.

A lawsuit was filed by State Rep. John Lawless, Joseph Wiedemer and Leechburg Area School Board member Charles A. Pascal, Jr. to block Jubelirer's simultaneous service in the Senate and the executive branch, but the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court rejected the argument and issued a per curiam decision allowing Jubelirer to hold both offices simultaneously. Jubelirer continued in both offices until January 21, 2003 when Schweiker's term expired. He declined to accept the Lt. Governor's salary during his term.

2006 primary election defeat
In May 2006, Jubelirer was defeated in the Republican primary by Blair County Commissioner John Eichelberger. He, along with Chip Brightbill, the Senate majority leader, were the first top-ranking Pennsylvania legislative leaders to lose a primary election since 1964. The defeat was attributed primarily to his role in drafting a legislative pay raise bill in July 2005.

Jubelirer initially defended the raise. However, after internal polling showed his support falling, he opened discussion of a repeal of the unvouchered expense provision. However, newspapers reported that he tried to block efforts to repeal the entire raise. In the wake of the controversy, the Senator issued a statement in which he called the pay raise a "mistake" ... I apologized for it in my district. I now think it was the wrong thing to do. Hindsight is 20-20. I'm not shifting the blame to anybody. I accept the responsibility." He pledged to return the money he had received from the unvouchered expense account.

During the campaign, Jubelirer's more conservative challengers attacked him on abortion. Despite statements during the 2006 campaign that he was anti-abortion, Jubelirer's opposition to the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act and a "pro-choice" rating by both the National Abortion Rights Action League and Planned Parenthood were used by opponents to counter his arguments. He told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that he was "a pro-choice Republican" and that he did not support the Republican platform on abortion. Jubelirer's initial annual pension was $90,934.

2013 Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees election
Jubelirer attempted a comeback of sorts, seeking a seat on the Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees. Despite an endorsement from former Gov. Tom Ridge, Jubelirer finished a distant sixth place, failing to earn one of the three seats. He was elected to The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees in 2014.

title: Robert Jubelirer


text:
Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College

The Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College is located in Jupiter, Florida and is the academic honors college of Florida Atlantic University. The residential college opened in 1999 and offers undergraduate degrees in the liberal arts and sciences under a modified curriculum.

Background
The Honors College shares Florida Atlantic University's John D. MacArthur campus in Jupiter, Florida with the Scripps Research Institute and Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience. All Honors College students are required to live on campus for their first two years. As of 2023, Justin Perry (Ph.D., Boston College) serves as Dean of the college, only the fourth in the college's history.

Since the college is housed on its own separate campus, it is almost exclusively made up by faculty and staff that only serve the Honors College. Although students typically have no need to take classes in FAU's other ten academic colleges, they have access to complete additional coursework at the university's flagship campus in Boca Raton. The Jupiter campus library serving the Honors College remains a part of the central FAU Library system housed in Boca Raton.

Overview
The Wilkes Honors College distinguishes itself from Florida Atlantic University's standards for traditional students and upper-division honors program by adding thesis, internship, research, and class type requirements for its honors college students. The college usually maintains an approximate 1:15 faculty-student ratio. It offers its honors students 32 major concentrations and 20 minor concentrations in the liberal arts and sciences. Honors students may also pursue a minor in business in collaboration with the FAU College of Business. The Honors College classifies its degrees differently from traditional FAU students. They offer a Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Science degrees in Liberal Arts and Sciences and Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Science degrees in Biological and Physical Sciences.

Pathways and Placement
The Wilkes Honors College holds several research and academic partnerships with the Scripps Research Institute and Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience. The Honors College also hosts the Wilkes Medical Scholars Program in partnership with the Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine as a pipeline program for honors students interested in earning their M.D. degrees. Approximately 20% of students pursue graduate school at Florida Atlantic University while 45% attend elsewhere. The Honors Colleges publicly reports student acceptances at several top institutions including Cal Tech, Georgetown, and the University of Chicago.

Symposium/Research Day
A tradition unique to the Honors College is the Honors College Symposium for Scholarly and Creative Research, also referred to as "Symposium Day" or "Research Day." It is an annual conference-type event that features public talks, poster sessions, research and visual arts presentations. Symposium Day usually includes a keynote speaker from a leader outside the university. Past speakers include Florida District Appeals Judge Carole Y. Taylor and Canadian science philosopher Dr. Michael Ruse.

Accreditation
Despite it being housed on a separate campus and the only FAU College authorized to use stand-alone iconography where the university name is not the main logo, it maintains its accreditation under the auspices of Florida Atlantic University. Through the university, the Honors College is fully accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.

title: Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College


text: User talk:86.131.17.222

title: User talk:86.131.17.222


text:
Talk:Mount Lycabettus

Copyedit- 1st paragraph
The geographical description in the first paragraph (it may not even be encyclopedic) needs to be cleaned up. I'm not quite sure what it's trying to say. I tried to fix it myself and may have cocked it up more: removed the sentence "It is accessed with only one road to the west and to Benakis Street and another one-way street." Is there one road to the entire hill or one road on the west side? Also, the sentence on the surrounding Athens areas needs to be clarified.

These two sentences looks like bad translation. Whitejay251 15:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

 * I removed that description and wrote a more general line or two, as well as copyediting the rest... Looks okay, so I've removed the copyedit template, but who knows :)

 * Fenrus 05:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mount Lycabettus


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheat Planet

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 04:48, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Cheat Planet
advertising Melaen 15:12, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Groeck 15:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Quasipalm 15:52, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete well I knew nearly as much as before reading the article. Alf 19:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text: User talk:80.98.42.156

title: User talk:80.98.42.156


text: User talk:64.31.180.15

title: User talk:64.31.180.15