text:
User talk:Hispanic rocker567

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 19:51, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hispanic rocker567


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/False Alarm (Russian band)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 00:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

False Alarm (Russian band)
A non-notable band: fails to meet WP:MUSIC. -DDerby- (talk) 19:51, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. — J I P | Talk 16:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless it can be established that they meet inclusion guidelines. -R. fiend 16:56, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:R. fiend. Punkmorten 21:29, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text: File:PGbox cover cropped.jpg

title: File:PGbox cover cropped.jpg


text:
Western Family Foods

Western Family Foods was founded as the Pacific Mercantile Cooperative on March 3, 1934, by a group of retailer-owned grocery wholesalers. Western Family Foods was established December 19, 1963. The company supplied independent grocery stores with store brands. It is based in Tigard, Oregon. It used to distribute the Western Family, Shurfine, Shursaving, MarketChoice, and Better Buy brands, which were used in many independently owned supermarkets. On June 13, 2016, Western Family Foods announced that they had been acquired by Topco and closed their Tigard office later in 2016.

title: Western Family Foods


text:
User talk:Stirling Newberry/06

 * Archives
 * 01 - 11 January 2004—11 January 2005
 * 02 - 3 January 2005—9 February 2005
 * 03 - 14 February 2005—25 July 2005
 * 04 - 25 July 2005—13 August 2005
 * 05 - 13 August 2005—16 October 2005

Civility
I suggest you read WP:CIVIL. --Revolución (talk) 04:01, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Moving your talk page
You moved your talk page to User talk:Stirling Newberry 0905. However, you can't really do this, because this would be the talk page for the non-existent user User:Stirling Newberry 0905. Therefore I moved it back to your userspace as User talk:Stirling Newberry/archive 1. You should retain a link to it on your talk page... trying to delete your talk page history is kind of frowned upon. -- Curps 05:11, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Well, Well, Well
Stirling, your constant accusations of violations of Wikipedia policies without even researching what caused the issue disgust me. You either really need to think before you speak, or actually learn how to research those who are supposedly "attacking" you. Get a grip. Seriously, you're embarassing yourself - and the self-imposed "Google" hit linkspam just increases your supposed "notable" visability. Get a grip on reality, and stop going on the defensive constantly. 81.117.200.52 21:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Your message
I came here to reply to your message, and found that your User page had been vandalised yet again. I've reverted it and blocked the anon (not his first or even second offence), but it provided a counterpoint to your comments. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 16:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Rodney King
I just put up Rodney King as needing attention. I know nothing whatsoever about the case, and the article in its current state isn't the best place to find out. I have the idea that you both follow U.S. news and have a political perspective that may balance that of the anons that have been editing the article. If the matter is of no interest to you, I apologize. Jkelly 22:14, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

WP:VIP | 2005 Atlantic hurricane season
Do you have some kind of personal grudge by accusing me of using a sockpuppet IP? I'll also refer you to Talk:2005 Atlantic hurricane season/Speculation. Also noting that there's a sentence after the names saying that the next three names to form will be named Alpha, Beta and Gamma. -- NSLE (Communicate!)  06:06, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Have you read Talk:2005 Atlantic hurricane season/Speculation? The consensus is right there. -- NSLE (Communicate!)  06:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Would it be best to request mediation or arbitration on this matter? -- NSLE (Communicate!)  06:24, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

 * EDIT: In fact, if you can come on to IRC, it'd be easier. -- NSLE (Communicate!)  06:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 06:38, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay. Also, I just want to make sure that you know that what you claim to be as "simple vandalism" is not.  Simple vandalism is basically "Blatant vandalism". -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 06:56, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

WikiSort Project
Hey, I have started the WikiSort Project. Come on over and check it out.the1physicist 21:08, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Excuse me?
Stirling, please, for the love of God, before you call someone a liar in their edit summary, make sure they're lying. You always seem to be on the ultra defensive because someone disagrees with you. Welcome to life, for someone who seems intelligent, you seem to be lacking in other areas. Conradrock 19:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Stub types
Hi. I've just been at work stub-sorting and ran across a few of yours in a row. I thought I'd let you know that there's a template econ-stub that you might want to use instead of stub, which is actually deprecated. Using econ-stub will sort the article into a category where people looking to improve short economics articles can easily find it. You can see all the different stub types, including several sub-types of econ-stub at WP:WSS/ST. Just wanted to let you know.

Thanks for your contributions! GTBacchus 06:09, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Maniacs in Boston
Hi, Stirling; how's the fall? Sign up to attend or volunteer @ wikimania...  Also, we should talk more about user stats and research; incl. how to attract excellent submissions from nearby regions & depts. +sj +  08:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Canadian blogosphere
Hi Stirling. Your Canadian cousins can use your illustrious presence over in this vfd.--Simon.Pole 04:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Liberalism
You've jumped into the middle of something, without commenting on the comment page and perhaps without even reading what has been going on on the comments page.

The liberalism article, as you might guess, is often the subject of major rewrites by people who are more interested in promoting their point of view than in being encyclopedic. Most recently, less than a week ago, Hogeye, who I think I can safely describe as on the libertarian wing of liberalism, rewrote the whole article to his liking. There was a discussion on the talk page about whether to revert everything Hogeye had written, or try to save the good stuff. Several of us decided to patiently work through the article, one section at a time, making limited changes and discussing them as we went.

Now, you have come to the article and made another set of huge changes on top of the changes already made by Hogeye, obscuring who is doing what to whom, and making more careful work more difficult.

Now, personally, I like some of your changes. In other cases, I think you should be writing a book instead of rewriting a wiki article, because your views are personal rather than standard.

Please, if you contribute further to the "liberalism" article, keep in mind the history of the article as it now stands, don't try to change everything at once like Hogeye did, and discuss changes on the talk page. Thanks. Rick Norwood 23:20, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Proposal for separate article on current surrealism
When you get a chance, would you please look at my proposal on the Talk:Surrealism page to create a separate article for current surrealist groups and artists, as a possible way of dealing with a lot of the nonsense and juvenile and hostile behavior that occurs on that page and with regard to the Surrealism article itself, and see what you think? Thanks. Jeremy J. Shapiro 22:48, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Sloppy edits
First, nobody reverted you without saying so. Editing what you wrote is not the same as reverting.

Second, you seem to think we are editing you to change the substance of what you wrote. Actually, we appreciate the substance of what you write -- you bring a lot of knowledge to the table. But you are sloppy. Your large edit left sentences in the wrong paragraph, separated a pronoun from its antecedent, and put topics out of order.

As for your most recent edit, here is a direct quote.

"and anarcho-capitalism consider themselves to b forms of ..."

See what I mean?

Now, everybody makes mistakes, everybody makes typos. But please don't take an attempt to correct your typos as an attempt to change your meaning. Rick Norwood 13:54, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

recent mail
I was glad to get your mail, and trust we can work together on improving the article. Have you any thoughts on "taxation of business vs. poor" relative to "taxation of corporations vs. workers" wording? Rick Norwood 17:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Important AfD
Hi. If you have time please take a look at Articles for deletion/List of modern day dictators. I'm a bit worried that the main protagonist for the keep side is threatening to reverse the long-established consensus against creating historical categorization schemes on Wikipedia based on editors' original research. If you are interested, arguments against generating such a list have been stated and restated over the course of several years at Talk:List of dictators. Thanks. 172 20:51, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Nine Eleven
Your contribution to the September 11, 2001 attacks article "President Bush and his supporters would later argue that the invasion of Iraq constituted the 'central front' of the war on terror, arguing the flypaper theory that terrorists will come to Iraq and be defeated, and that the insurgency is directed or allied with terrorist organizations and state sponsored terrorism. Critics of the war on Iraq argue that this assertion is nothing short of absurd, and that Iraq had nothing to do with Al-Qaeda or the 9/11 attacks, and that the two conflicts are different matters and that Bush's attempt to conflate the two is outright dishonesty. Legally it has a separate existence covered by a different congressional resolution, as it is not covered either under the resolution to retaliate for 9/11, and therefore it is not counted as part of the 'Global War on Terror' by the US Department of Defense." can be formatted to be encyclopedic through the use of quotes and cited sources. This information is valuable and could benefit the article and those reading it were it to be submitted in an NPOV format. --Peter McConaughey 17:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that I had to revert your edit. Our articles need to be stated from a neutral point of view. In order to do that, the author can't make statements asserting his original research. Instead of attributing conclusions to Bush's statements, allow the reader to draw his own conclusion, or at least state what authoritative source considers this to be a conclusion. Your contribution is good stuff, but I would like to challenge you to make it stronger by citing sources and stating it from a neutral point of view. --Peter McConaughey 22:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

That does it
I'm obviously shy. Thank you for deleting that text in Postmodernity. I just wrote under it, "John Gardner hates it." ;) Not that John Gardner is--well, you know.  --VKokielov 05:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

What did you do with the history?
What have you done to the history on the "List of dictators" page? It went back to April 2002. jucifer 17:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Your signature
Hi Stirling. I noticed your signature has an external link. It's not that I think your site is bad, it's just that having external links in signatures might not be something we want. It creates a precedent for people using it to spam Wikipedia talk pages and increase their incoming link count for Google rank improving purposes. Maybe the link on your user page is enough? Zocky 19:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

 * I agree. Strongly. --Maru (talk) Contribs 03:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

 * I feel the same way. --Nicholas 10:54, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

 * Agreed. We fight off link spammers all the time, and your signature link might give people the impression that you're no different from them. A link on your user page would be fine, but it is well known that one of the best ways to artificially inflate ranking/hits is to link to a site as many times as possible on Wikipedia, making sure to use the name of the site in the link. — BRIAN 0918 • 2005-12-9 04:23

 * Please remove the external link from your signature. android  79  13:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

I have requested arbitration on this issue. Like many people here, I greatly admire the article work you do, but linkspamming is just not on. You've been asked nicely, and you've essentially said "make me"; as far as I see, we now have little alternative. Ambi 14:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I disagree that the only problem is the signature span. His contributions are unreferenced POV mostly and he seems to rarely if ever make a contribution to the associated talk page. His edit summaries challenge the 3RR rule and he makes accusations that those that revert his unencyclopedic jargon are vandals. I see nothing to greatly admire about his contributions or the manner in which he makes them, but maybe you're just be a lot nicer than I am...at least I hope that is the case.--MONGO 16:18, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Please see External_links which clearly states that promotional external links such as those in your signature should not be used. I'm not attacking you or your contributions. Just your signature :) — BRIAN 0918 • 2005-12-9 18:02

Ok, so we went through the motions and now Sign your posts on talk pages clearly says "no external links". Is that good enough or do we need a decision by the board? Happy editing, Zocky 22:08, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

 * I totaly agree. What if everyone did that.  People could start earning money by editing wiki.  jucifer 23:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Since it seems that you have not gotten the message: Please remove the external link from your signature. Whatever the value of your contributions, whatever the strength of your contributions to discussions, it's not acceptable. Thanks.--Sean|Bla ck 07:24, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Alright. Since you have refused to even discuss the matter, are ignoring the guidelines at Sign your posts on talk pages, and are still using the link in your signature, I've temporary blocked you. You can still reply on your talk page. You will be unblocked as soon as you remove the link from your signature. -- BRIAN 0918  15:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Stirling, I appreciate that you seem to think that not allowing users to use external links in their signatures is a bad idea. But, by now you must appreciate that other editors overwhelmingly dissagree. In multiple locations where this was discussed (see upper links), many editors opposed the practice and expressed serious concerns, while not a single one supported it. Please stop it so that we can all stop wasting our time with this. Zocky 23:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

 * Can't someone who knows about bots just set one going deleting all his links. This is a real traversty.  Wiki shouldn't be about shameless self-promotion. jucifer 01:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Babel
Could you consider adding this template to your userpage? It is very helpful in case translators are needed and such.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Where is the archive of your talkpage?
While working on an article, it was noted that the discussion continued in your talk page. Could you be so good as to tell me where you have hidden the contents of your talk-page from Jan-04 to Jun-05 as I would like to read it.

Yours, jucifer 16:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

 * They seem to be at User talk:Stirling Newberry 01, User talk:Stirling Newberry 02, and User talk:Stirling Newberry 03. —Locke Cole 07:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Archives
I noted that several of your archives weren't shelved as proper subpages. I moved them and listed them at the top of this page for you, along with the date ranges involved. Hope it helps! -- Netoholic @ 02:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

WP:V citations
You may be interested in Wikipedia talk:Verifiability: Format of citations and WP:V examples, and WP:FN. (SEWilco 08:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC))

Deleting Inflation graphic dimishes work
Article: inflation

Stirling - (cur) (last) 14:08, 12 November 2005 Stirling Newberry (Removing core inflation graph it is a controversial concept.)

Can you elaborate here? Is there a factual error?

Have re-added and await your substantial justification for the delete. This piece took some time to create and, I think, adds to the presentation.

jk

Oil Price graph in Oil Shock
The axis label says it is in nominal dollars, but the data are in real dollars. I'm just a frequent user trying to help, and I do not know how to proceed.

69.47.134.193 23:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)Jeff

By The Way
Hi Stirling, why did you automatically assume that the community was out to get you when we respectfully requested that you cease your linkspam? I just want to get your side of the story, and I apologize for any personal attacks that you may feel from my request, or personal attacks that I have committed in the past. I truly regret them now, and I now realize the error of my ways. I also realize that I have probably hurt you to a great deal, but you've hurt me too, after all.

So you said some things, and I said some things, it's in the past, let's move on.

Nice MySpace profile BTW!: http://profile.myspace.com/8910712

Very Truly Yours,

Ray Lopez 82.51.131.243 19:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Excuse me? Redux
Stirling, please, for the love of God, before you call someone a liar in their edit summary, make sure they're lying. You always seem to be on the ultra defensive because someone disagrees with you. Welcome to life, for someone who seems intelligent, you seem to be lacking in other areas. Conradrock 19:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

(Reformatted to continue discourse)
 * Personal attacks, like lying in edit summaries, are against the rules. Thank you for your cooperation. Stirling Newberry 18:20, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Uh, Stirling, how did I lie in any edit summary? In any case, you just contradicted yourself; you called someone a liar in your edit summary, then you tell me that calling someone a liar in an edit summary counts as a personal attack? Yeah, good thing you thought that through before bringing it to my attention. Conradrock 01:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Friedman
You might be interested to take part in the latest discussion in Talk:Liberalism on Friedman's citation. 159.46.248.228 14:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC) = Electionworld

1.0 Collaboration of the Week
Hi, I noticed you signed up as a member of the Version_1.0_Editorial_Team, which is looking to identify quality articles in Wikipedia for future publication on CD or paper. Recently, a 1.0 Collaboration of the Week was created to work on essential topics that are in need of improvement, which will ultimately go in a release version of Wikipedia. You can help by voting, contributing to an article, or simply making a comment. Thank you for your support. :) Gflores Talk 08:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

"Theorum [sic]"?

 * Economist whose early work was based on Kenneth Arrow's General Possibility Theorum, and on the impossibility of both complete paereto optimality and solely

"Theorum"? Michael Hardy 22:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Liberty Dollar
I've nominated the page "Liberty Dollar" for nomination and am notifying you accordingly since you are a contributor. BrianGCrawfordMA 23:13, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Pages up for deletion
I ask you to look at these two articles up for deletion: Cretan/Spartan connection and Revolution within the form, I ask for a vote for "make external link". Thanks. WHEELER 22:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Graph on Oil Crisis Page
I wanted to know what your source was for the graph on the oil crisis page that showed the history of world oil prices.

Regards,

Kunal

Spacefaring
Spacefaring has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe (Talk) 02:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Computers in postmodernity
On 21 January 2005, you redirected Computers in postmodernity to Votes for deletion/Computers in Postmodernity. I've reverted that redirect. I agree the article is in bad shape, but if you believe it should be deleted instead of leaving for someone to clean-up, please nominate it for deletion. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 03:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Version 1.0 "Release Version Qualifying"
Hi, I'm interested in your feedback on Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Qualifying. It's essentially an idea to use a process similar to WP:FAC to identify and handle articles and lists that would go in a release version. Maurreen 19:27, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

WP 1.0
I thought since you are interested in this project you might be interested to see a CD version of en now exists see Wikipedia-CD/Download & 2006 WP CD Selection. This is being discussed on the 1.0 project pages but progress breeds enthusiasm so I thought I would let you know. --BozMo talk 09:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Oil.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Oil.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Peer review requested for Deconstructivism
Hey there, I was wondering if you would be at all interested in peer reviewing Deconstructivism. We have got it to a stage where some criticism would be beneficial and we'd be very grateful for your input. Many thanks --Mcginnly 11:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Van houtte octopus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Van houtte octopus.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 00:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Semiprotection
I took the liberty of semi-protecting your user page a few days back... let me know if you want that lifted for some reason. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 00:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've seen your delightful trolls at work. It wasn't clear to me from your message whether you wanted the semi-protection left in place or lifted, though. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 00:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Serialism
A lot of comments in articles that serialism is bad or passé or historically superseded or whatever were added by John Kenneth Graham, who usually quoted himself as a great composer and authority on music in the process. I've been trying to expunge his POV and non-notability from the music articles, but apparently there is still more work to do. Thanks for helping. CRCulver 02:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Postmodernism
Please see my note on Talk:postmodernism. Thanks JenLouise 03:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back
I just saw your account name appear on my watchlist. Welcome back! 172 | Talk 00:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

George Allen
I have no wish to become embroiled in an "edit war" with you. The "other criticisms" section has no place in an encyclopedia. If you remove the npov warnings, I will consider it vandalism to the article and do what I can to have you blocked. It is obvious from your page that you have an opinion that is hostile to George Allen. That in of itself is ok, as long as you keep your articles and edits to a neutral point of view. Nnoppinger 03:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Good job!
Good job swallowing your pride, and deciding that google bombing "bopnews" on Wikipedia with your signature was indeed a bad thing. WikipediaSleeperCell2 15:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Possible sockpuppet or impersonator
Hello. I noticed recently that a new user with a username almost identical to yours registered and copied your user/talk page. . I have reported them at WP:AIV. Feel free to comment there or look over their contributions and undo anything they might have done to masquerade as you. --Kuzaar-T-C- 19:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stirling Newberry/06


text:
Talk:Yonge Street

"Longest Street in North America" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Longest Street in North America. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Bearcat (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Yonge Street as the "longest street in the world"
The current map is misleading. The section of road between Bradford and Barrie didn't become known as "Yonge Street" until Highway 11 was extended in the 1920s. Yonge Street was strictly the portion to Holland's Landing (and a tad north). -  Floydian  τ ¢ 03:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What part of the map implies that the Bradford-to-Barrie segment was called Yonge Street before the 1920s at all? It's contrasting the current Yonge Street against the downloaded alignment of Highway 11 as of 1998 and the current terminus of Highway 11, so I don't see what the 1920s have to do with it. Bearcat (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It just implies that it's part of Yonge Street, when it is in fact a separate road with the same name. There's plenty of Yonge Street's in Ontario, and I don't believe it is accurate to include anything but the original portion in this article. -  Floydian  τ ¢ 21:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Except that's not the point of that map. The infobox map (which just depicts the original John Graves Simcoe alignment) covers off that purpose — but the map in the "longest street in the world" section is meant to depict the complete extent to which Yonge Street and Highway 11 could ever have been taken as synonyms for each other. Which means that map does have to show both segments, because its core purpose is to illustrate "where did Highway 11 carry the street name Yonge and where did it not". Bearcat (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You make a good point. I retract my issue. -  Floydian  τ ¢ 17:34, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II
— Assignment last updated by Michelle312 (talk) 02:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Yonge Street


text: User talk:70.52.5.51

title: User talk:70.52.5.51


text:
Robertsonpet

Robertsonpet is a township in the city of Kolar Gold Fields in India. It is one of the first planned residential areas in modern-day India. The township was planned and built to accommodate the increasing population of the city of Kolar Gold Fields. The town hall popularly known as King George Hall is lavishly built in Victorian style with an impressive lawn and garden in front of it.

Robertsonpet was established in 1902 and named after Sir Donald Robertson the British Resident of the Princely state of Mysore. It is considered to be one of the premier well-planned townships in Modern India.

History
In the late 19th and early 20th century, the mining industry expanded under the John Taylor and Sons Company. In its peak period, it employed 4500 employees, and the waste rocky terrain was developed into a township. The township was first established in 1901 as New Town, to house the population working in the KGF Mines. On 15 August 1903, the township was renamed as Robertsonpet. The town got its name at the insistence of the Maharaja of Mysore, who named it after Sir Donald Robertson the British Resident of Mysore. As the township grew, tradesmen such as bakers, confectioners, jewellers, pawn brokers, barbers, timber merchants, tailors, etc. migrated and set up shop in Robertsonpet.

A town hall (similar to town halls in Australia) was built in Victorian architectural style with arches, canopies and large gardens, and was named as the King George Hall. The KGF Club in Oorgaum and the King George Hall Cosmopolitan Club were established providing faculties for badminton, tennis, cards, carom, snooker, etc.

Sir Donald Robertson
Sir Donald Robertson is credited with starting the hydro-electric plant at Shivanasamudra, which supplied electricity to the KGF Mines. Robertson served as the British Resident of the Mysore Darbar in the 1900s, and during his tenure drafted the Constitution of the princely state of Mysore. He worked towards providing amenities to the population of KGF, even to those who were not employed by the mines, and is largely credited for establishing the KGF mining towns. In recognition of his services, His Highness the Maharaja of Mysore Krishna Raja Wadiyar IV renamed New Town as Robertsonpet. After retirement from government services, Robertson joined the mining enterprise John Taylor and Sons Company. He died on 13 October 1930.(p. 291)

Demographics
There is also a substantial Anglo-Indian population at KGF, descendants of the English mine supervisors. Robertsonpet is a melting pot of cultures with people of different communities: Kannada, Anglo Indian, Tamil, Telugu, Marwari, Muslims, etc., living in the township.

title: Robertsonpet


text:
User talk:Ganesha1

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 19:55, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

India related links
Please see WP:V. Do not remove information without discussion. It would be considered as vandalism. Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 06:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Kurudumale
Hi, they speedy deleted your article Kurudumale for some reason but I recreated it from the edit summary. Please put back any info that got destroyed - I couldn't see which king made the temple. Kappa 20:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Thanks

Requests for adminship/ganesha1
It seems you tried to apply for adminship. I suggest you wait a little while before trying this. Administrator status is typically awarded to users with >3 months Wikipedia presence and an edit count of over 1000. Participation in discussions and other community activity is deemed desirable. JFW | T@lk  10:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

 * Please tell me if you want me to delete the page. JFW | T@lk  10:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:DSCN0669.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

 * Hello, I've nominated your article Kannada Proverbs for deletion as it was proposed for deletion and the deletion was contested. Please visit/contribute to the AfD discussion.--Isotope23 15:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Nagaraj
What is the relationship between user:Netgir netgir/user:NETGIR NETGIR and yourself? They have already made inept and unsuccessful attempts to put up an article about this Nagaraja guy. If you want your article M.T.B. Nagaraj to stick, you will have to do more work on it: -- RHaworth 17:25, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Establish his importance within the first two sentences: does in his early days in school he was naughty suggest a notable person to you?
 * Learn to put a space after a full stop!

Dr. Satyavant M. Mallanna
This article you started is currently proposed for deletion: Articles_for_deletion/Dr._Satyavant_M._Mallanna. I wonder if you have any verifiable sources for it. Tyrenius 17:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:DSCN0694.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:DSCN0694.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

T.Mariappa
I've added the "prod" template to the article T.Mariappa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:T.Mariappa. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Hi, Someone has pointed out my error on this article and removed the deletion tag- could use some expansion per the tags though --Peripitus (Talk) 21:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:DSC00026.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC00026.JPG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 02:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Bharat Gold Mines Limited
Hi Ganesha1,

I see you have started the article Bharat Gold Mines Limited. In it you wikilink to the term British twice. BThe wikipage British is a disambiguation page and should not generally be linked to in an article. I was going to change the links myself, but was unsure in the context whether to link to United Kingdom or British Raj. Could you take a look and make the edit? Or just let me know and I'll do it. Thanks -- Siobhan Hansa  10:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Welsh? No. English by birth, though I'd noramally say British.  Now live in the USA. The name is a psuedonym I dreamed I was called once.  I've always loved the name Siobhan.  Very lyrical :-) -- Siobhan  Hansa  19:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

REGARDING M.T.B. NAGARAJ
RESPECTED SIR,First of all I would like to introduce myself to you sir.My name is Girish and i have done my Masters degree in Environmental Engineering from Bangalore University.Sir i have read your articles it is really very good and i appreciate you for placing some of the facts on the wikipedia page regarding kuruba community and some of its famous personalities.Sir i would like to request you to put Mr.N.NAGARAJ(M.T.B.)in the page you have created,because sir I have seen him closely and observed his activities.He is the upcomming congress leader in Karnataka state.He has entered politics by winning the Cauverynagar councillor seat in Mahadevapura Bangalore by polling 94% of votes and it was a record.Then hecontested the hoskote assembly on a congress ticket and won against Bachee Gowda who is an former minister.Sir he has done lot of social services to the society. I would like to tell a few things sir.He conducts mass marriages free of cost for the benifit of the poor people.He gives pensions for the widows,blind people,aged people, all from his own hard earned money.He has helped many unemployed youths by getting them both government jobs as well as private jobs irrespective of caste.He also has built many roads and dug bore well from his money.He has also donated books and clothes to schools and colleges from his own money.Sir after he bacame an M.L.A. he has done a lot of work in his constituency.Sir still if you need more information about his work and his contributions to the society you can always email me anytime for the clarifactions.Sir as of now he is the richest man in the whole of kuruba community in the karnataka state.He has got a brick factory in Bangalore which is one of the three best brick company in Bangalore(M.T.B.)MANJUNATHA TABLE BRICKS. He is also nick named as (M.T.B.) SIR He has got lot of industrial sheds housing famous garments,motors etc..Sir he has built the biggest choultry in Bangalore named M.T.B. SUBHA MEHRU and another one named M.T.B. MANGALA MEHRU in Marthalli ring road.He has built lot of commercial complexes in Bangalore city. He is building Singa Gardens In Whitefield road Jointly it is a 1400 residential apartments.He is building big software tech park Jointly with Baagmane Limited Sir I feel he is worth mentioning in your page.I hope you do the kind needful at the earliest and oblige.

Thanking you,                                     yours faithfully GIRISH

Regarding N.NAGARAJ (M.T.B.)
Respeted Sir,With respect to the above person, the sugesstions and guidance you have given me sir, I will try to follow it. I really thank you for responding back. I hope you continue the good work you are doing, God bless you Sir.

Thanking you,                            Yours faithfully Girish

Thanks
Thanks for good editing at the article Khandoba at 16:15, 27 September 2006 Ganesha1 (Talk | contribs) (cur) (last) 16:14, 27 September 2006 Ganesha1 (Talk | contribs) From :- Vishal Prakash Dudhane -- Vishal1976.

Dear dear little Ganesh's Uncle,

your stub on Gandhigiri is wonderful piece of writing, also speaks how hard working and deep thinker you are. You are also very swift. I am impressed but why you have omitted personal details. This world is so good that you will miss the affection if you are shy of socialising. Add your education and other details to your page. Now I understand how Wikipedia is expanding at this pace. Love to you and your loveable nephew who inspire you. You love him and and he inspires you.I aspire many more articles from this great team. Gandhiji and God bless you both.

subzbharti

Thanks Subzbharti
Thanks for liking the article, about keeping my details secret, i don't feel i have achieved enough yet to disclose my personal details, but will definately do when i feel its the right time. Meanwhile if ur interested read this poem about gandhiji --Ganesha1 11:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Kanakadasa's Photo on Vijayanagar empire page.
Please feel free to do so. I have not come across one so far. If you can find one, I would say you have done this page a great honour. Unfortunately, I dont see pictures of the other Haridasa's either.Dineshkannambadi 16:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Dineshkannambadi

Elephants
Hi. I see you've added a few elephant articles. The one on Elephant Arjuna is currently proposed for deletion, and I've started a discussion on merging Mysore Dasara with Dasara. Do you think that what's been done for Kerala, a central article like Elephants of Kerala, would be useful in organising any other articles for Karnataka elephants?? --Mereda 12:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Baragalophobia
Hello! Do you have any sources for the definition and usage of this phobia. I would be interested to read them. Regards, (aeropagitica) 20:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Phobias
Please do not do this any more. Putting 'phobia' on the end of a word, and then writing an article about it is basically just making things up. Tom Harrison Talk 00:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Ganesha, dont talk like a fool, what do mean by saying that "those who say the miracle did'nt take place are brahmins and not shudras"? Bannanje Govindaacharya is a scholar of high standing and unlike U for him truth is the only criteria for knowledge, the editing which I have I done is absolutely true and if U have guts prove it wrong, don't indulge in cheap politics and look down upon great scholars by labelling them as casteists

Re: Abuse Report
Hi user Nagarajachar has used very offencive and abusive language against me and my family in my talk page which is very rude and i am really upset about it, he has made personal attacks could you please take some action. Though he has not left his signature or time.Thanks--Ganesha1 08:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Done. Next time, please report this type of incident to WP:PAIN, as any given admin may be away from their computer and this will delay the response, if one is warranted. (aeropagitica) 11:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Mr Ganesha please do no not simply delete an edit to the article without having any knowledge about it. The facts which I have been mentioning about kanakana-kindi is verified not by just 1 person, a lot of people have done research in this regard. No person has challenged these arguments of Bannanje Govindaacharya and the proofs are documented.

I need not write tons of bull-shit like U to wikipedia to prove myself great,U need not worry abt the millions of kannadigas as I am a proud kannadiga myself. I am proud that my 1 honest and true contribution is enough to shake false beliefs in people like U. I am not a fanatic like U who does enquire facts while posting articles, I am a proud follower of kanakadasa not because of some incident which has not occured but because of his teachings and contribution to Madhva school of thought.

 * In regards to the message you left on User:Nagarajachar's talk page, please do not call people religious fantatics or vandals. Try to comment on content and not on the contributors.  I understand that he has been uncivil to you in the past, but our no personal attacks rule is not negotiable.  Thanks. Shell babelfish 17:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Mosque image in Mysore article
Hi Ganesha, I found that you have removed an image of Mosque from Mysore article. I checked the licensing info on that image, and it looked fine. Is there any particular reason why you removed that? Thank you - KNM Talk - Contribs 00:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

@Ganesha
yes now I can understand how many tons of nonsense U have written in this encyclopedia, telling that kanakadasa had nothing to do with madhva is the height of foolishness and indeed it is not surprising that U think like that. 1st learn to get the facts right before writing anything.

Now I know after all why U are resisting the changes in the article, u are a great 'socialist' isn't it? In Ur article on basavaraja devaru U have claimed because of his agitations government has taken over Udupi Krishna temple. This is far from the truth as usual u have no idea about it, so each of contributions is nonsense in one way or the other.

Responding to personal attacks
Do not respond to personal attacks with further personal attacks. Ignore the attacks or only bring them up in the appropriate venues. —Centrx→talk • 17:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi please to meet you, I you can speak Hindi. I need a favour can you translate these quotes of Mahatma Gandhi into Hindi for me I would really appreciate it :-) Kind regards

An eye for eye only ends up making the whole world blind. - Mohandas Gandhi

Be the change that you want to see in the world. - Mohandas Gandhi

Culture of the mind must be subservient to the heart. - Mohandas Gandhi

--Sikh historian 01:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

ಸುವರ್ಣ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಕನ್ನಡ ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವ
ಕನ್ನಡ ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವದ ಹಾರ್ದಿಕ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು!!

Wish you a very happy Kannada Rajyothsava. - KNM  1 November 2006

Adding some more names.
Respected Sir, With respect to the above I have added some more names. Ganesh sir I am bringing to your notice about this and I would also like to Convey my kind regards to you. God bless you. You have done a wonderful job in highlighting many things in your page. Please continue the good work. I hope you do the needful and oblige. Yours faithfully Girish (Netgir_Netgir)NETGIR NETGIR 09:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NETGIR NETGIR (talk • contribs) 09:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC).

Speedy deletion of Mimicry Dayananad
A tag has been placed on Mimicry Dayananad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Probably a typo in the name. Google search turns up entirely empty. In any case, lack of context makes the article impossible to categorize and/or change its orphan status

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pascal.Tesson 16:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:DSCN0707.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSCN0707.JPG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 18:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Hadi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Philip Trueman 12:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Wales?
Where exactly in Wales?

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on M. D. Nataraj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SWik78 21:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Kittten
I was looking at the photograph of the kitten you contributed to the Domestic Short Hair wiki page. It made me smile all morning!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.148.223 (talk) 17:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Please be careful not to add inappropriate external links to articles, thanks
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Gwernol 13:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding links to unrelated poems
Please stop leaving links to unrelated poems on Wikipedia articles. A general poem about Wales is not relevant to an article about the Welsh language. Neither is it a notable poem out of all the thousands which have been written in and about the language. It is also a conflict of interest since it is apparently a poem you wrote yourself. The Wednesday Island (talk) 16:09, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

 * (If it is a poem you wrote yourself, as friendly advice I would suggest you try to stay away from rhymed arrhythmic couplets: they are fatally easy to write and therefore fatally easy to do badly (and because of this were the favourite form used by William McGonagall, which means they remind many readers uncomfortably of his work). Try a more formal pattern such as a sonnet or villanelle, or alternatively try free verse.) The Wednesday Island (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Josef Fritzl
There was already an article "Joseph Fritzl" about this man, which had been redirected to Elisabeth Fritzl about the same case. I have redirected your "Josef Fritzl" also to Elisabeth Fritzl. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bed Blockers
I have nominated Bed Blockers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bed Blockers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Madcoverboy (talk) 14:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Khedda
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Khedda, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.kamat.com/kalranga/prani/elephants/khedda.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Khedda and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Khedda with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Khedda.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Khedda/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Khedda saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Chris Capoccia T⁄C 06:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Chaturanga
Hi, I see you've edited Chaturanga in the past and I wonder if you could have another look at it? I've just been looking at the vandalisms of a particular IP address and while all the edits they have done to other articles have been vandalism I don't know enough about Chaturanga to know whether they have vandalised it or improved it.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  13:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * PS, I noticed you're in the UK, if you are near London you might like to join us at Meetup/London 14  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  20:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

File:DSCN0855.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSCN0855.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. – Quadell (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:DSCN0747.JPG
File:DSCN0747.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Vivek Nagar.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * File:DSCN0503.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Bandarlapalle.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Cat's at play
is that your cats play fighting photo? it's quite handsome. Francisco Herrero (talk) 01:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of I. H. Sangam Dev
A tag has been placed on I. H. Sangam Dev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Saebjorn! 03:59, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ganesha1! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Chandre Gowda -

Notification of proposed deletion - Elephant Balarama
Hi, I have added a proposed deletion notice to Elephant Balarama which you created. My concerns are that the article does not provide evidence of notability and does not cite any sources. (There are also tense issues where the article states the Elephant "will" do things without suggesting when, although that's not a deletion concern.) If you fix these issues please feel free to remove the deletion notice. DustFormsWords (talk) 21:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Balakrishna Guruji
A tag has been placed on Balakrishna Guruji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jarkeld (talk) 23:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Balakrishna Guruji, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jarkeld (talk) 00:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Asha Rani (actress)
A tag has been placed on Asha Rani (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WookieInHeat (talk) 02:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajesh(Kannada Actor)
A tag has been placed on Rajesh(Kannada Actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WookieInHeat (talk) 02:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Asha Rani (actress)
A tag has been placed on Asha Rani (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gudleppa Hallikere

The article Gudleppa Hallikere has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 11:37, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mahadeo Jankar

The article Mahadeo Jankar has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Government English Higher Primary School

The article Government English Higher Primary School has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the content of this article. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jaladhi Bapparaya

The article Jaladhi Bapparaya has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Lack of reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Tim Pierce (talk) 22:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Kuruba Language moved to Kannada Kurumba
Hello. I have moved the article Kuruba Language created by you to Kannada Kurumba as per the ISO 639-3 listing. Please continue your editing there. --Nayvik (talk) 05:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jaladhi Bapparaya

The article Jaladhi Bapparaya has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Article is not verifiable, as it is supported by no reliable sources. Every Google result is self-published, and the one reference also appears to be.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Lear's Fool 13:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Basavaraja Devaru

The article Basavaraja Devaru has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:BIO; literally the only coverage I can find is mirrors of Wikipedia

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 23:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jungle Jackie Rajesh

The article Jungle Jackie Rajesh has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.   The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * No info about this person with refrences of noble info

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Kamkek (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agasa Gowda

A tag has been placed on Agasa Gowda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Boolyme बूलीमी   Chat बोलो!! 15:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

hiiii....kumbara gowda
Hi

Good start for your creation of wikipedia on kumbara gowda.I would like to discuss some more regarding that, would you share your details, cell or email id.

Best regards raju —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raju.kumbara (talk • contribs) 18:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Samaya TV

A tag has been placed on Samaya TV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Abhishek Talk to me 12:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Hoogar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoogar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hoogar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind talk  21:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

i want to know about kurumbas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.248.44.64 (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Kurubas

The article List of Kurubas has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * the names mentioned in this list were completely unsourced.if there are any notable kurubas with proper references we can add them in the main page of the said ethnicity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pernoctator (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Kuruba films

The article List of Kuruba films has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * unsourced..there is no proof that mentioned films are exclusively about kuruba people.and even if they were is it encyclopaediac

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pernoctator (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tennis Krishna

A tag has been placed on Tennis Krishna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mschilz20 (talk) 07:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Tennis Krishna
Hi Ganesha1! I've declined the speedy deletion nomination mentioned above, but because the article didn't have any sources, I've put a notice on the page that it will need some or it will, unfortunately, have to be deleted in about a week's time. I'll help out if I get the chance, but you can remove that notice if you can add a quick reliable reference or two - it looks like there are a lot around, but I'm caught up in a project at the moment, so I can't evaluate them myself. But if you need any help, just let me know - I'll be glad to assist if I can. - Bilby (talk) 08:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jaladhi Bapparaya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaladhi Bapparaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jaladhi Bapparaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lear's Fool 07:41, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220  of  Borg 20:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Referencing
I am surprised that I am giving a summary template message to someone who has been editing WP for so long (almost 7 years!). You also seem to create articles with bare URLs for references, such as. If your online sources are moved, as often happens, then without details like: title, author, publisher, ISBN, access date etc, it might be very difficult to locate them again. Even just a title makes them much easier to locate again.

Please see Citations quick reference and Referencing for beginners (see template below too). There are many tools or utilities that make adding such important details a simple cut and paste or even drag and drop operation. Even try the "Cite" button that should be on the editing tool bar above the editing window. (see picture at right) - 220  of  Borg 20:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

 * Kuruba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Sangam and Golla

 * Manjusha Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Origin of Vijayanagara Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Famous Kuruba
Hi There, Can you pleaase add T.Mariappa, a freedom fighter and politican from the erstwhile Mysore state. He was the Home Minister and Finance Minister. The road from Ashoka Pillar to Madhavan park has also been named as T.Mariappa road. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._Mariappa

Thanks HM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.3.26 (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I have gone thru the page you have created for P.R. Thippeswamy on wikipedia. I want to share more information about him. Can I have your contact details please? My mail id is sowjanyahp@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.34.242.22 (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

lts b frendzzzz.............................. :---) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.163.116.24 (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of B. V. Radha for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B. V. Radha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/B. V. Radha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 23:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Coconut Miracle

The article Coconut Miracle has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * WP:Unreferenced and WP:OR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vin09 (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Kuruba, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.''

 * The version of the article that you restored is clearly inappropriate when considered in relation to Wikipedia's policies. You even tacitly acknowledged this by reinstating the numerous maintenance tags. This is disruptive: if there are any particular bits within that version which you feel might justifiably be reinstated then please discuss them on the article talk page first. Thanks. '' Sitush (talk) 12:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kuruba shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

 * What is it that you do not understand about my earlier note in this section? You should not keep reverting simply because you do not like something. - Sitush (talk) 14:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ronur Sri Lakshmi Venkataramana Swamy Temple

The article Ronur Sri Lakshmi Venkataramana Swamy Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "No indication this is a notable temple in any encyclopedic sense. No significant sources located in English, and no native-language name provided to search."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

=Request for Protection of Page=

Hello, I’ve added a lot of content to the Kunchitiga page over the last 3 days, I realised I needed an account to be able to protect the page from any potential vandalism. Then I realised you need to be an administrator to do the same! I’d be grateful if you could grant me administrative privileges for the same so I can protect it against vandalism when need be. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberanthropologist (talk • contribs) 08:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chandre Gowda

The article Chandre Gowda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Departmental head of a medical college, not notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 00:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Byatarayana Betta

The article Byatarayana Betta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Does not appear to meet notability standards. No significant coverage, no articles on other language wikis, no claim to notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ganesha1


text:
Onatas

Onatas was an ancient Greek sculptor of the time of the Persian Wars and an exponent of the flourishing school of Aegina. Many of his works are mentioned by Pausanias; they included a Hermes carrying the ram, and a strange image of the Black Demeter made for the people of Phigalia; also some elaborate groups in bronze set up at Olympia and Delphi.

For Hiero I, king of Syracuse, Onatas executed a votive chariot in bronze dedicated at Olympia. In Delphi he was one of the sculptors who executed the Ex voto of the Tarentines.

If we compare the descriptions of the works of Onatas given us by Pausanias with the well-known pediments of Aegina at Munich we shall find so close an agreement that we may safely take the pedimental figures as an index of the style of Onatas. They are manly, vigorous, athletic, showing great knowledge of the human form, but somewhat stiff and automaton-like. His artistic style contribute to the formation of the so-called Severe style.

Onatas has also been linked to the Riace warriors group, also attributed to Phidias. The pair were found off the coast of Reggio Calabria in 1972.

title: Onatas


text: User talk:70.29.125.167

title: User talk:70.29.125.167


text:
Darrin Brown

Darrin Brown (born October 28, 1970) is a Canadian 1st Assistant Director and former actor best known for his role as Dwayne Myers on the Degrassi television series.

Brown was born in Toronto, Ontario. In 1992, Brown received a Bachelor of Applied Arts degree in Radio and Television Arts from Ryerson Polytechnical Institute (now Toronto Metropolitan University). Currently, Brown works predominantly in film as an assistant director.

title: Darrin Brown


text:
User talk:CTA

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | WS 19:56, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:CTA


text:
User talk:John Fallens

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:John Fallens


text:
User talk:Karenfisher

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Spam
Please review WP:SPAM. Thanks...KHM03 17:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Karenfisher


text:
Monte Mario Observatory

The Monte Mario Observatory (Sede di Monte Mario, literally "Site of Monte Mario") is an astronomical observatory and is administratively part of the Observatory of Rome (Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma). It is located atop Monte Mario, near the right bank of the river Tiber, in the municipality of Rome, Italy. This location (12°27'8.4"E ) was used as the prime meridian (rather than that of Greenwich) for maps of Italy until the 1960s.

title: Monte Mario Observatory


text:
User talk:Bjoernschmittt

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 19:59, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bjoernschmittt