text:
Talk:1935 Atlantic hurricane season

Stub?
I personally don't believe this is a stub anymore, as all the storm accounts are there and I added in details for the individual storms. I believe this article is closer to start class overall. Anyone else concur? CapeVerdeWave 19:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

 * Agreed, I raised it to start. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

 * Very close to B-class IMO. CrazyC83 02:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

 * Not quite, it needs more sources. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

 * That's correct and it needs the line references. CrazyC83 20:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:N041535.jpg
The image File:N041535.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --13:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?
The article says that the yankee hurricane's highest windswere 80 mph in the article (Cat.1),but it also stated that it peaked as an 105 Mph Hurricane(Cat.2 strength)in the info box.I'm not a user(sorry!) so I can't change the info in the box,so can someone change the info from Category 2 to Category 1? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.224.179 (talk) 00:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

 * The 105 mph max strength is from HURDAT. The 75 mph figure is from the older Monthly Weather Review article that mentions an observed measurement, probably from the "downtown office" that is likely a few miles south. I made adjustments that reflect the HURDAT data but this section could use a more thorough review.

title: Talk:1935 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1937 Atlantic hurricane season

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on 1937 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516095439/https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1937.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1937.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:1937 Atlantic hurricane season


text: User talk:128.61.78.133

title: User talk:128.61.78.133


text: Talk:1934 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1934 Atlantic hurricane season


text: Talk:1931 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1931 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1930 Atlantic hurricane season

todo
List indivual storms Storm05 18:52, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

More detail is needed now.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Record
No storms formed during September during this season. I think that's the only time that ever happened in the Atlantic basin. Should this be mentioned? Rye998 (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:1930 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Interstate 240 (North Carolina)

Interstate 240 (I-240) is a 9.1 mi Interstate Highway loop in the US state of North Carolina. It serves as an urban connector for Asheville and runs in a semicircle around the north of the city's downtown district between exits 53B and 46B of I-40. Between those points, I-40 continues in an east–west direction further south of the city, roughly parallel to the Swannanoa and French Broad rivers. The western segment of I-240 is now being cosigned with I-26 as part of a larger project extending I-26 from its former western terminus at I-40/I-240 to U.S. Highway 23 (US 23) near Kingsport, Tennessee. However, NCDOT officially identifies this part of I-26 as Future 26.

Years prior to the loop's completion, I-240 was known as I-140; however, no signage was ever posted for I-140. The I-140 designation has now been given to a spur route in Wilmington.

Route description
I-240 begins at an interchange with I-26 and I-40 west of Asheville. I-240 and I-26 travel concurrently for 4 mi along the western section of the routing. I-240 travels almost parallel to the French Broad River to its east. In the northwestern part of the route, US 19, US 23, and U.S. Highway 74 Alternate (US 74A) merge onto I-240 to cross the French Broad River. After crossing the river, I-26 proper ends and becomes Future I-26. Future I-26/US 19/US 23 exit off to the north and US 70 merges with I-240. The concurrent highways travel through the northern section of downtown Asheville. US 70/US 74A exits off I-240 at Charlotte Street. The Interstate continues through a cut in the mountain before turning back to the south. I-240 cross the Swannanoa River near Asheville Mall before terminating at an interchange with I-40 while the roadway continues on as US 74A, known locally as Charlotte Highway.

History
In the early 1960s, the east–west freeway around downtown Asheville, designated US 19/US 23, opened from the Beaucatcher Tunnel westward to NC 191.

By 1966, Hanover Street had been converted to a freeway, which carried U.S. Highway 19 Business (US 19 Bus.)/US 23 Bus./NC 191; additional freeway was constructed from Haywood Street to I-40. In 1968, eastbound lanes were added to the Smoky Park Bridge, the main connector across the French Broad River. The original lanes, opened January 23, 1952, became westbound lanes.

The next step began with the 1964 presentation by J. O. "Buck" Buchanan to the NC Highway Commission Board. An Interstate Highway was to be built from the east to downtown Asheville to connect with the existing freeway. The best way to do this, it was concluded, was to blast an 800 ft passage through Beaucatcher Mountain. The Beaucatcher Mountain Defense Association, formed in the early 1970s, endorsed a tunnel, which would mean only about five percent of the mountain would be disturbed. In 1977, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) selected Asheville Contracting Co. for the project. 3 e6cuft of rock, including greywacke believed to be one billion years old, would have to be moved, and all of it could be used in the construction. The company had several connections to those responsible for the road plan: company president Baxter Taylor was a business partner of Ted Jordan, a highway board member and a member of the Chamber of Commerce Highway Committee; they founded Hyde Insurance Company, which sold $39.9 million (equivalent to $ in ) in bonds to finance the plan. And Buchanan went on to work in public relations for Asheville Contracting. One of the Defense Association's arguments was the highway's proximity to Zealandia, the estate of Philip Henry, whose Tudor mansion was covered by the 1966 National Historic Preservation Act. However, when the mansion was named to the National Register of Historic Places on March 14, 1977, the destruction of the mountain had started. The 4 mi project was completed October 31, 1980.

In 1971, NC 191 was extended along part of the unsigned freeway from Haywood Street to Brevard Road. On November 1, 1980, I-240 was officially established on the western half of the freeway from I-40 to Charlotte Street; NC 191 was rerouted north along Brevard Road to its current terminus at Haywood Street. By 1982, I-240 was extended through the Beaucatcher Cut onto new freeway east to I-40. In 1995, all of I-240 was named the Billy Graham Freeway.

In 1989, the North Carolina General Assembly approved a plan for urban loops around the state's major cities. Included in this plan was a bypass for Asheville, which included an "I-26 Connector" to link two sections of I-26, one ending south of Asheville, and the other north of the city designated "Future 26". For the controversial plan, $14.2 million (equivalent to $ in ) was spent, but, in 2010, the I-26 Connector was demoted to last among 21 urban loop projects. Improvements to I-240 were scheduled for 2020.

On April 5, 2012, the North Carolina Board of Transportation voted unanimously to rename the Smoky Park Bridge for Capt. Jeffrey Bowen, an Asheville firefighter who died in July 2011 fighting a fire. The board's policy traditionally prohibited naming state roads and bridges for firefighters, but numerous protests of the state's March decision led to the change. North Carolina Department of Transportation statistics show the eight-lane bridge to be the most traveled section of highway in Western North Carolina, with 99,000 vehicles a day.

Future
A planned construction project, dubbed the I-26 Connector, is a $600–800-million project to build the missing gap of I-26 through Asheville. Broken into three sections, they are all planned and funded in the 2016–2025 STIP. Section A, between Haywood Road and Brevard Road, will be a widening project with reconfiguration of ramps at Haywood, Amboy and Brevard. Section B, between north of Haywood Road to US 19/US 23/US 70, is the most expensive section of the project at $332 million. After a review of various alternative designs, both state and federal agencies chose Alternative 4B, which will convert Patton Avenue along Bowen Bridges to local traffic and reroute I-240 along I-26 further north. Section C, the I-26/I-240/I-40 interchange, will be reconfigured to include missing ramp connects and a widening of I-40 through the area. The approximately 7 mi project will begin right-of-way acquisition in 2019, with construction on all three sections in 2021. Additional plans for I-240 in west Asheville call for its expansion from four lanes to eight lanes.

As part of the I-26 Connector, in 2016, both state and federal agencies chose Alternative 4B, which will convert Patton Avenue along Bowen Bridge to local traffic and reroute I-240 along I-26 further north. In addition, the I-26/I-240/I-40 interchange, will be reconfigured to include missing ramp connects and a widening of I-40 through the area. The approximately 7 mi project planned to begin right-of-way acquisition in 2019, though delays included state money and worries over how neighborhoods would be affected. Contracts are to be awarded in 2023 and 2024 and construction to take three to five years. The estimated cost increased from $750 million in 2017 to $1.2 billion in 2023.

title: Interstate 240 (North Carolina)


text:
LMS Stanier Class 5 4-6-0 4767

London Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) Stanier Black Five, LMS number 4767, BR number 44767 is a preserved steam locomotive. In preservation it has carried the name George Stephenson though it never bore this in service with British Railways.

Service
4767 was completed on the last day of the LMS, 31 December 1947 at Crewe Works. It was unique amongst the 842-strong class in that it featured outside Stephenson link motion in addition to other experimental features; a double chimney, Timken roller bearings throughout and electric lighting.

These modifications were part of a series of experiments by George Ivatt to improve the already excellent William Stanier-designed Black Five.

4767 was renumbered 44767 by British Railways after nationalisation in 1948. Its double chimney was removed in 1953. It was withdrawn in December 1967 after a working life of only 20 years.

Allocations
44767 was only transferred between sheds five times during its career with British Railways with it is first allocation being to Crewe North and it is final allocation being at Carlisle Kingmoor. The list below shows the shed locations of 44767 on particular dates.

Preservation
44767 was purchased directly from British Railways for preservation by Ian Storey and was stored at Carnforth until 1974 when it was taken to Thornaby for restoration to running order by the North Eastern Locomotive Preservation Group. Restoration work was complete for the 150th anniversary of the Stockton and Darlington Railway in 1975. At Shildon, the former Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, William Whitelaw named 44767 after famous railway engineer George Stephenson. A plaque below its nameplates reads:

This locomotive was named by the Right Hon. William Whitelaw C.H. M.C. M.R. at Shildon on August 25th 1975 to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the Stockton and Darlington Railway.

In 1988, it was featured in 'The Thistle' music video by Jesse Rae. Filming locations on the West Highland Line with Glenfinnan Viaduct. The locomotive saw regular use along the mainline, including services in Scotland. The locomotive was based on the North Yorkshire Moors Railway before being taken out of service at the end of 2002 for a full overhaul.

In December 2009, 44767 returned to steam at Morpeth in Northumberland, where it was overhauled, from where it was moved to the Great Central Railway for running in and painting.

Between May and September 2010, 44767 was in use at the North Norfolk Railway, before visiting the West Somerset Railway for their Autumn Gala. It then spent the winter of 2010 at the Churnet Valley Railway, before visiting the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway for their winter steam gala in February 2011. It then returned to the North Yorkshire Moors Railway for the 2011 season, before returning to the Churnet Valley Railway for the 2011 winter season, although its stay there was curtailed due to firebox troubles. Following a two-year repair effort, the engine re-entered service at the North Norfolk Railway in February 2014, where it ran for the rest of the year, before moving to Swanwick at the Midland Railway – Butterley to undergo work. In September 2018, 44767 was sold to the West Coast Railway Company.

title: LMS Stanier Class 5 4-6-0 4767


text:
Category:First Families of Virginia

 (FFV) were those families in who were European, socially prominent and wealthy, but not necessarily the earliest settlers. They descended from English colonists who primarily settled at Jamestown, Williamsburg, and along the James River and other navigable waters in Virginia during the 17th century. These elite families generally married within their social class for many generations and, as a result, most surnames of First Families date to the colonial period.

title: Category:First Families of Virginia


text:
Theodoros Pangalos (politician)

Theodoros Pangalos (Θεόδωρος Πάγκαλος; 17 August 1938 – 31 May 2023) was a Greek politician and leading member of the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK). He served as the deputy prime minister of Greece, responsible for the coordination of the Government Council for Foreign Affairs and Defense (KYSEA) and the new Economic & Social Policy Committee from 2009 to 2012.

Early life
Pangalos was born in Eleusis, Greece, on 17 August 1938. He was the grandson of General and 1926 dictator Theodoros Pangalos. Some of his ancestors were Arvanites.

Pangalos was member of the left-wing Lambrakis Youth and, in 1964, a candidate for the Hellenic Parliament with the United Democratic Left (EDA). Pangalos opposed the 1967 military dictatorship, and was deprived by the junta of his Greek citizenship in 1968.

Political career
Pangalos became a member of the Communist Party of Greece (KKE), rising to its Central Committee, before eventually joining the PASOK socialist party during the Metapolitefsi. He was elected for the first time as an MP in the 1981 general election with PASOK and has been continuously re-elected since until 2012.

In 1996 he was appointed Minister for Foreign Affairs and held the post until his resignation in 1999, in the aftermath of the scandal involving the leader of PKK, recognized as a terrorist organization by EU, Abdullah Öcalan: helped by individual members of the Greek intelligence agencies Öcalan entered Greece illegally and was then deported to Kenya, where he was captured by Turkish agents after leaving the Greek embassy at Nairobi.

Pangalos came under fire when he said in 2018 on a radio show “The only good Turk is a dead Turk. I believe this because I have not come across a good Turk. They lack basic appreciation.”

Pangalos was briefly made Minister for Culture in 2000, an appointment which was widely criticized, in view of his previous statement that artists who had protested his handling of the Öcalan affair were kuradomanges (Greek: κουραδόμαγκες) (turd tough guys).

Death
Pangalos died on 31 May 2023, at the age of 84. His remains were cremated on 2 June.

Quotes

 * "Mazi ta fagame" (Greek: μαζί τα φάγαμε) (lit. "we ate them together", meaning "we are all responsible for the debt").

In popular culture
A Greek experimental pop band named Plastic Flowers sampled his famous speech "mazi ta fagame" in their song "Sinking ship-vanished crew".

title: Theodoros Pangalos (politician)


text:
User talk:History1850

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 22:23, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hey thanks for starting The Manor House Bishop Bridge it would be great if you could add to it and format the article a little more, thanks Arm 22:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:History1850


text:
Template:Lists of airports by IATA code

List of airports by IATA airport code: A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z

title: Template:Lists of airports by IATA code


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Curran (historical)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. H e rmione1980 23:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Sarah Curran (historical)
Her only claim to notability is that "She was Robert Emmet's big love.", but Emmet's article doesn't mention her. If this is deleted, also delete redirect page Sarah Curran(Historical), and fake disambiguation page Sarah Curran. dbenbenn | talk 22:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure what to do about this, but she's certainly well-known e.g. the pub up the road from me is named after her. I haven't got time right now to add to the article though.  Try a Google    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  22:35, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I wasn't familiar with this name before. But, with a little Googling it seems she is an historical name of note, even if by proxy.  Two centuries is a long time to be remembered.  Wikipedia should be a follower of who has been found to be notable, not a determiner of who should be deemed notable.   Also, while the Robert Emmet article doesn't mention her, it links to this, which does.   --rob 23:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Robert's letter to Sarah should make everything clear. Uncle G 03:42, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and move the article to Sarah Curran, as Sarah Curran(Pub) just redirects to the city the pub is in. The pub is mentioned in her article and probably doesn't need one of its own. -- Kjkolb 04:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the current contents of Sarah Curran (historical) but move to Sarah Curran. I've never seen a less necessary disambiguation page in my life. -R. fiend 05:06, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, undoubtedly, and move to Sarah Curran as per Kjkolb and R. fiend. Palmiro | Talk 13:04, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the comments above. Hall Monitor 18:09, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Ahdustin

Sorry from deleting some information you added. My main concern is that the lists of group members will become out of date very quickly, and in five years the entry will be totally inaccurate. - SimonP 22:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tijuana Brass 05:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:Ahdustin


text:
Talk:Fornebu

Spelling
The local dialect, as it were, in Bærum, uses "bo" and not "bu" and will consistently refer to the area as "Fornebo" and not "Fornebu." The fact that the politics of the Norwegian language made "Fornebu" the official spelling of the area does not render the local preference "archaic." --Leifern 22:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fornebu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100227020528/http://e24.no/boers-og-finans/article3534926.ece to http://e24.no/boers-og-finans/article3534926.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Fornebu


text: User talk:71.112.97.217

title: User talk:71.112.97.217


text:
Conway Park railway station

Conway Park railway station is situated in the centre of Birkenhead, Merseyside, England. It lies on the Wirral Line of the Merseyrail network.

History
Conway Park is the newest station on the Wirral Line. In 1990, the Merseyside Development Corporation joined with British Rail and Merseyrail to study the cost of the new station. The station opened to the public on 22 June 1998, after an official opening by Neil Kinnock on 24 April 1998. Conway Park is between Birkenhead Park and Hamilton Square stations built into an underground tunnel built by the Mersey Railway in the 1880s. It was built by excavating a box downwards, opening out the roof of the tunnel, which is 18 m below ground level. The platforms are reached by stairs or lifts from the ticket office.

The station was built in order to provide a station on the lines from New Brighton and West Kirby that was more convenient for the town centre of Birkenhead than either Birkenhead Park or Hamilton Square (which are otherwise the nearest stations). Its name comes from the name of the redevelopment area on the north side of the town centre in which it is situated. The name has come under criticism as some regard it not to be particularly indicative of the station's location. When it was originally being planned, the station was known as Birkenhead Market. The platforms are protected by ticket barriers. The road which the station is situated on is Europa Boulevard.

Facilities
The station is staffed during all opening hours and has platform CCTV. There are toilets, a payphone, a vending machine, booking office and live departure and arrival screens, for passenger information. The station does not have a free car park, though there is a drop-off point on Europa Boulevard, as well as a "Pay and Display" car park, to the rear of the station as viewed from Birkenhead town centre. Step-free access to the platforms, for wheelchairs and prams, is possible, via the lifts. Each platform also has sheltered seating. Free Wi-Fi was introduced in October 2015. There is secure cycle parking for 10 cycles.

Services
During the daytime peak (7:00 - 19:00), there are four trains per hour to New Brighton and West Kirby and eight trains per hour to Liverpool. Outside of the daytime peak, the frequency is halved. These services are provided by Merseyrail's fleet of Class 507 and Class 777 EMUs.

title: Conway Park railway station


text:
User talk:Voxy Roxy

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers such as yourself:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Spinboy 22:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Copyright of Image:Frankie1.jpg
Hi there, thanks for uploading Image:Frankie1.jpg. I noticed that there is some required information missing from the image description. The Wikimedia Foundation has to be very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:
 * who created the image
 * the copyright status

If you created the image: If you haven't already, please add a note in the description of the image saying that you created it. Next you need to choose a copyright license so that people on Wikipedia know what they can and cannot do with your image. There are only a few licenses to choose from for images you created yourself. Once you have decided which one you wish to use, simply copy the tag exactly as shown into the image description. Please note that you MUST allow people to freely use and copy your image (you may apply some conditions to that), else it may not be used on Wikipedia.

If you didn't create the image: If you haven't already, please provide a URL to the site it came from (or the name of the source if it didn't come from a website) and the name of the person or organisation that owns the copyright. You next need to add a copyright tag so that other users know how the image may be used. Please browse the list of image copyright tags and determine which applies to the image. If, after browsing this page, you are unsure of the tag to add, please add a Don't know tag to the image description and someone will help you choose the correct tag.

Please note that if you do not choose a copyright tag for the image within seven days, it will be deleted. Please could you ensure that any other images you have uploaded also have the above information in the description - you can see a list of the images you've uploaded by clicking on My Contributions and selecting Image from the drop-down box. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on my talk page. Thanks! --David Johnson [ T|C ] 01:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Hi. Unfortunately the 'promomotional photograph' tag only really applies to officially released photographs released to promote a person or organisation (in this case it would have to have been released by the record company). Futhermore, I'm afraid re-uploading and selecting a license doesn't actually save the license anywhere (I don't know why, it just doesn't...) so the image was still un-tagged. I've reviewed the source URL you added and determined that Wikipedia can use the image under fair use. I've added the appropriate tag and an explaination of why I think it is fair use to the image. Cheers, David Johnson [ T|C ] 01:39, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

 * Left a reply on your talk page. --WikiFiend90 03:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Blaine-Larsen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Blaine-Larsen.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 05:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mrs._Potato_Head.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mrs._Potato_Head.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 18:56, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Terror_Squad.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Terror_Squad.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 00:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

christian reincarnation complication
I noticed on your user page that among your hundreds of tags you have that you're a christian and you believe in reincarnation (and several other things). I'm not trying to give you a hard time but don't those two beliefs conflict? and if you don't think they do, does that mean jesus is on the earth right now, possibly as a ladybug? Vicarious 09:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

New Wiki
That's quite a lot of user boxes, but I've seen more ;) I'm contacting people who have depression userboxes.  I'm working on a new wiki about depression, and thought you might be interested.  It's planned to be a resource for people with dpression, and a wiki community.  It's over at Wikicities (a project started by Jimbo and Angela), perhaps you'd like to have a look?  The url is http://depression.wikicities.com  .  Thanks -- sannse (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey
Greetings from me --Cowboy From Hell 22:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)DJ BatWave

Image:NERD.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NERD.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 22:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Frankie1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Frankie1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 17:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi sara :)
Hello there! StopVandals Now 20:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Voxy Roxy


text:
Spinal shock

Spinal shock was first explored by Whytt in 1750 as a loss of sensation accompanied by motor paralysis with initial loss but gradual recovery of reflexes, following a spinal cord injury (SCI) – most often a complete transection. Reflexes in the spinal cord below the level of injury are depressed (hyporeflexia) or absent (areflexia), while those above the level of the injury remain unaffected. The 'shock' in spinal shock does not refer to circulatory collapse, and should not be confused with neurogenic shock, which is life-threatening. The term "spinal shock" was introduced more than 150 years ago in an attempt to distinguish arterial hypotension due to a hemorrhagic source from arterial hypotension due to loss of sympathetic tone resulting from spinal cord injury. Whytt, however, may have discussed the same phenomenon a century earlier, although no descriptive term was assigned.

Phases of spinal shock
Ditunno et al. proposed a four-phase model for spinal shock in 2004 as follows:

Phase 1 is characterized by a complete loss—or weakening—of all reflexes below the SCI. This phase lasts for a day. The neurons involved in various reflex arcs normally receive a basal level of excitatory stimulation from the brain. After an SCI, these cells lose this input, and the neurons involved become hyperpolarized and therefore less responsive to stimuli.

Phase 2 occurs over the next two days, and is characterized by the return of some, but not all, reflexes below the SCI. The first reflexes to reappear are polysynaptic in nature, such as the bulbocavernosus reflex. Monosynaptic reflexes, such as the deep tendon reflexes, are not restored until Phase 3. Restoration of reflexes is not rostral to caudal as previously (and commonly) believed, but instead proceeds from polysynaptic to monosynaptic. The reason reflexes return is the hypersensitivity of reflex muscles following denervation – more receptors for neurotransmitters are expressed and are therefore easier to stimulate.

Phases 3 and 4 are characterized by hyperreflexia, or abnormally strong reflexes usually produced with minimal stimulation. Interneurons and lower motor neurons below the SCI begin sprouting, attempting to re-establish synapses. The first synapses to form are from shorter axons, usually from interneurons – this categorizes Phase 3. Phase 4 on the other hand, is soma-mediated, and will take longer for the soma to transport various growth factors, including proteins, to the end of the axon.

Autonomic effects
In spinal cord injuries above T6, neurogenic shock may occur, from the loss of autonomic innervation from the brain. Parasympathetic is preserved but the synergy between sympathetic and parasympathetic system is lost in cervical and high thoracic SCI lesions. Sacral parasympathetic loss may be encountered in lesions below T6 or T7. Cervical lesions cause total loss of sympathetic innervation and lead to vasovagal hypotension and bradyarrhythmias – which resolve in 3–6 weeks. Autonomic dysreflexia is permanent, and occurs from Phase 4 onwards. It is characterized by unchecked sympathetic stimulation below the SCI (from a loss of cranial regulation), leading to often extreme hypertension, loss of bladder or bowel control, sweating, headaches, and other sympathetic effects.

title: Spinal shock


text:
Talk:Cossack motorcycle

Eisenach
Two versions by anons:

 * 1) Moretheless it must have been the comlete BMW factory in Eisenach (former East Germany) that went to Russia for reparation payment after the second WW that gave the "know how" to build this sidecar motorcycle in Russia.
 * 2) Despite many accusations the comlete BMW factory in Eisenach (former East Germany) never went to Russia for reparation payment after the second WW as it remained in East Germany producucing R-35 motorcycles.

Which? mikka (t) 22:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC) In Eisenach the EMW (Eisenacher Motorrad Werke) was produced, the R-35 with Single cylinder engine. ++Scooterman 23:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The story I've heard (from many different sources) is that the Russian army wanted a motorcycle and tested several and found that the BMW was the most suitable. However at that time Russia and germany were at war so they bought five BMW motorcycles via a third part in Sweden. Then the motorcycles were reverse engineered and "russified". // Liftarn

 * Why would it have to be the complete factory? The Chinese CJ750, a bike built on the Russian tech, has a more involved history for this than either of the alternatives offered above. http://www.sidecar.co.za/history_of_the_cj750.html See what you think. Seasalt 14:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Eisenach has NO place in Cossack motorcycle. The HO OHV flat twins sold under the Cossack name were first built 22years after the capture of Eisenach. They were swingarm framed bikes NOT rigid like ALL the bikes built at Eisenach during the war. The Dnepr OHV design owes more to the Zündapp KS750 than any BMW. (And don't forget that BMW copied the KS750 to make the R75). The Soviets purchased a vast range of OHV bikes to disassemble and study prior to, and during, the production of their OHV bikes. So saying that IMZ "copied" the R75 is like saying that Honda "copied" BMW to produce the shaft drive GL1000! (There ARE photos of the early six cylinder variant with a BMW transmission and FD - Proof!)

Discussion as to the origins of the KMZ flat twin (KMZ/Kiev/Dnepr) and IMZ flat twin (IMZ/Irbit/Ural) belongs on their respective pages and NOT here. M-72 05:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

In Australia in the Seventies, the flat twins were marketed at different times with Ural, Cossack, Dnieper (English spelling of time) and also with "M-series" badges? Seasalt 12:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

IMZ Ural (M-Series) and KMZ Dnepr (K-Series) and the Chinese versions of M-72 (X-Series) are all "cousins" from the BMW and Zundapp families.

Generally speaking, despite all the badge names used over the years, the name "Cossack" is still widely accepted as a general name for a motorcycle built in Russia, Ukraine, or the former U.S.S.R.

title: Talk:Cossack motorcycle


text:
Talk:Red Line (Washington Metro)

Contradiction
It says that Maryland was added for the time with the extension to Shady Grove in December 1984, but it lists several Maryland stations at earlier times, including Grovesnor in August 1984 and Silver Spring in February 1978. That doesn't make any sense.

138.88.184.122 00:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Fixed this, moving the contradictory passage elsewhere. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Map Accuracy
Can someone please fix the red line map that is provided in this article? The fact that it is not at all at scale and in fact draws weird and inaccurate boundary lines (i.e. the District line) should be remedied.

1984
Information on various articles state that Shady Grove, Rockville, White Flint, and Grosvenor opened a month before Tenleytown-AU, Friendship Heights, Bethesda, and Medical Center and that Twinbrook opened four months after its neighboring stations were opened. I don't understand how that would work. --Jnelson09 (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Photos
Article is looking quite good, but was missing mention of the 2004 Woodley Park accident, so I added text from the main Washington Metro article about that and added two photos. I think some additional non-accident photos could be nice too, but no sure what. Cheers. --Aude (talk) 03:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

 * I believe that if we are going to discuss accidents like this, we should also discuss the 1996 collision at Shady Grove to complete our discussion of Red Line accidents. The accident pictures, however, I think are a little overkill in this context, since we've used the same photos elsewhere, and since it's a general article about the Red Line.  Otherwise, just by looking at the pictures, one would almost think that the Red Line is where all the accidents happen.  I agree that some non-accident photos would be a good idea.  Let me see what I have in my archives, and I'll post a few new ones up.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 22 January 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Speedy close and not moved, partly because of WP:SNOW, and partly because the IP has a disruptive history of insisting that article titles be lowercased. -- Red rose64 🌹 (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)  Red rose64 🌹 (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

– Lowercase the word “line” per WP:NCCAPS. The word “line is a generic descriptor 2600:1700:1960:F100:A882:B52C:C11A:62E9 (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Red Line (Washington Metro) → Red line (Washington Metro)
 * Blue Line (Washington Metro) → Blue line (Washington Metro)
 * Silver Line (Washington Metro) → Silver line (Washington Metro)
 * Orange Line (Washington Metro) → Orange line (Washington Metro)
 * Green Line (Washington Metro) → Green line (Washington Metro)
 * Yellow Line (Washington Metro) → Yellow line (Washington Metro)
 * Oppose. Not if reliable sources capitalize the "L" in running body text like any other proper noun, like Axios, WUSA/Channel 9, WTTG/Fox5, WTOP/103.5 FM, and the Washington Post do. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose with extreme prejudice. Shall we go around to virtually all the lines of all the other subway and metro systems, to apply a solution in search of a problem? Uporządnicki (talk) 10:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Zzyzx11. S5A-0043 Talk 11:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Zzyzx11—blindlynx 15:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose. WP:NCCAPS says to lowercase unless there is a clear majority of independent reliable sources that capitalise. Per the sources below, nearly all such sources capitalise "Line" in the names of Washington Metro lines. Thryduulf (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Zzyzx11. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose, snow on the tracks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

 * Strong oppose and speedy close GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 17:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Examination of Sources
In no particular order, here is a complete list of usage in running prose in the independent (apparently) reliable sources I found searching for "red line" "Washington Metro" (and then the same but for the green and silver lines). Excluded are sites that are not independent, clearly unreliable (e.g. forums), those that didn't use it in prose, those that only referred to multiple lines (e.g. "Green and Blue lines") and two sites that didn't capitalise the colour word (e.g. "take a red line train"). They are listed in no particular order. Thryduulf (talk) 16:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Line:
 * Governing
 * Washington Post
 * Washington Business Journal (1), (2)
 * International Railway Journal
 * New York Times (1), (2)
 * US Geological Survey
 * WAMU
 * Metro Cincinnati
 * US House of Representatives committee hearing
 * WTOP (1), (2)
 * Montgomery Community Media
 * EconWorks
 * Transportation History
 * Railway Pro
 * Forbes
 * Capital News Service
 * Frommers
 * The Architect's Newspaper
 * line:
 * Railway Technology
 * Fox News
 * Inconsistent:
 * Genetics Society of America 12 instances of "Line" 1 of "line".

title: Talk:Red Line (Washington Metro)


text:
Eric Gallagher

Robert David Eric Gallagher CBE, (24 August 1913 – 30 December 1999) was President of the Methodist Church in Ireland during 1967.

Gallagher was born on 24 August 1913 in Ballybay, Count Monaghan, to Robert Gallagher from County Fermanagh, and his wife Helen (née McIlroy) from County Tyrone. Robert was a methodist minister who later served as president of the Methodist conference from 1946–7. His ministry required frequent moves to new congregations, and the family relocated seven times before Eric was 20.

He graduated from Trinity College Dublin in 1936, with a BA in modern languages and English literature. Two years later he graduated from Edgehill Theological College in Belfast, and in 1941 he was ordained. The rest of his career was spent in various ministries and chaplaincies in Belfast.

Late in 1971, in a meeting arranged by West Belfast priest Des Wilson, Gallagher had discussion in Dundalk with Provisional IRA leaders Seán Mac Stíofáin, Rory O'Brady and Joe Cahill. The republicans wanted him to convey to the British Government (through Opposition leader Harold Wilson) the offer of a two-week truce, during which British forces (on the streets since August 1969) would be withdrawn to barracks. The message was conveyed, but nothing transpired until the following June when, as a prelude to secret talks with the government PIRA began "bi-lateral truce" on the 26th. The ceasefire ended on 9 July 1972.

In 1974 he was one of a group of Protestant clergymen who met with Provisional IRA officers in Feakle, County Clare in the 1970s to try to broker a lasting cessation of the conflict.The meeting was broken up by the Gardaí but the IRA officers, including David O'Connell and Seamus Twomey, had already left.

He spent 22 years as superintendent of the Belfast Central Mission, from 1957 until 1979.

He died on 30 December 1999, aged 86, and was interred at the Lisburn New Cemetery at Blaris, County Down.

Legacy
At Gallagher's funeral in January 2000, Cardinal Cahal Daly, with whom Gallagher had jointly chaired a social issues group behind the Violence in Ireland report to the churches stated: "Not many people have been clear and steady beacons of light in the darkness of the last 30 years. Eric Gallagher was one ... [I]t was a privilege to work with him ... he took risks for peace."

Other
Gallagher was the subject of Peacemaker, written by Dennis Cooke.

title: Eric Gallagher


text:
Talk:Recent Songs

Production
"Produced by Henry Lewy, the album was a return to Cohen's acoustic folk music after the Phil Spector experimentation of Death of a Ladies' Man."

Was this also a return to direct master recording, i.e. without multitracking.

 * What do you mean? The album was recorded onto multitrack tape, as all his others. – Hattrem 22:03, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

 * "The album was recorded onto multitrack tape, as all his others."
 * I'd be surprised if the original multitrack recordings survive (let alone in top shape). I would like to know which albums were recorded in analog.203.214.75.127

 * You're in for a surprise then, as an outtake from this album (although in poor shape) was remixed with new vocals dubbed for inclusion on the 2004 album Dear Heather ("The Faith").
 * All of Cohen's albums except for the last two, Ten New Songs and DH, are analogue recordings. – Hattrem 06:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

My mistake yesterday (just came to edit it): Sharon indeed debuted on the tour later that year, while Cohen debuted as producer with Lissauer in 1974:-) Tomsak 08:59, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Editions
"Recent Songs was released on CD in 1990."

How long has the vinyl version been out of print for?144.139.85.53

Remastered version?
Is the current CD edition remastered, as is the case for most of L.C.'s pre-1990 albums? --109.193.211.159 (talk) 09:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Recent Songs


text:
Talk:1929 Atlantic hurricane season

todo
This article needs a lot of work, these articles from 1900 to 1939 needs to have some sort of structure! Storm05 18:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

 * That's why it's a stub. Jdorje 19:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I upped it to start due to every storm having their own section. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:1929 Atlantic hurricane season


text: Talk:1927 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1927 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1926 Atlantic hurricane season

Death/Damage sourcing
Just keeping an easy access list here. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Season Total: 1,392-1,432 deaths and at least $243.8 million in damage

 * One - 234 Deaths $15.8 million
 * Monthly Weather Review: Storms and Weather Warnings
 * 25 Deaths $2.35 million in Puerto Rico
 * $3 million in the Dominican Republic
 * "Great" damage in the Bahamas
 * $2.5 -$3.5 million in Florida
 * The Evening Independent
 * 4 deaths in Florida
 * 1 death in Georgia
 * Atlantic hurricanes with 25+ deaths (NHC)
 * 60-247+ deaths (total) in Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Bahamas and Florida
 * The Sun, The Southeast Missourian, The New York Times
 * 150 dead and $8 million in damage in the Bahamas
 * Youngstown Vindicator
 * $5 million in Nassau alone
 * The Hartford Courant
 * 54 deaths in the Dominican Republic
 * Total losses from the storm estimated at $10 million

 * Two - At least 32 fatalities
 * Nova Scotia Shipwreck Database
 * 26+ off the coast of Nova Scotia
 * New York Times
 * 6 Additional deaths off the coast of Nova Scotia

 * Three - 25 deaths and $3 -4 million in damage
 * Atlantic hurricanes with 25+ deaths (NHC)
 * 25 Deaths in Louisiana
 * Monthly Weather Review: The Tropical Storm of August 25-26, 1926 in Southern Louisiana
 * $3 -4 million in damage

 * Four

 * Five
 * Nil

 * Six

 * Seven- 391 deaths and $125 million in damage
 * Atlantic hurricanes with 25+ deaths (NHC)
 * 264-349 deaths (total) in Bahamas, Florida and northern Gulf States
 * Subject: E12) What have been the deadliest hurricanes for the USA? (NHC)
 * 374 Deaths in the Southeast United States
 * Los Angeles Times
 * 804 deaths in Southern Florida, estimated to have exceeded 1,000
 * The Hartford Courant
 * 1,000 deaths in Southern Florida and damage estimated up to $125 million
 * The Morning Leader (Initial estimates, not representative of actual death toll)
 * 1,200 fatalities and thousands more injured
 * Miami - 500 dead, 700-800 injured, 28,000 homeless
 * Hollywood - 250 dead, 1,000 injured, 10,000 homeless
 * Miami Beach - 150 dead
 * Moorehaven and Clewiston - 140 dead
 * Fort Lauderdale - 100 dead
 * Hialeah -54 dead
 * Dania - 11 dead
 * Homestead - 3 dead, 1,000 homeless
 * Coral Gables - 3 dead
 * Hellandale - 2 dead
 * Larkins - 1 dead
 * Ojus - 1 dead

 * The Glasgow Herald
 * 17 deaths in the Bahamas

 * Eight

 * Nine

 * Ten - 710-750 fatalities at least $100 million in damage
 * Atlantic hurricanes with 25+ deaths (NHC)
 * 709 deaths (total) in Cuba and Bermuda
 * St. Petersburg Times
 * 1 death in Bermuda
 * St. Petersburg Times
 * 600+ deaths in Cuba (117 confirmed in Havana alone), 9,000 more injured and 6,000 families homeless
 * The Hartford Courant
 * 650+ deaths in Cuba
 * Sarasota Herald-Tribune
 * At least $100 million in damage in Cuba
 * Gettysburg Times
 * 1 death in Florida, relatively minor damage
 * Lawrence Journal-World
 * Roughly 100 deaths off the coast of Bermuda
 * 19 survivors (New York Times)
 * St. Petersburg Times
 * $3 -5 million in damage in Bermuda
 * Eleven

title: Talk:1926 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1925 Atlantic hurricane season

Strongest storm
85 knots = 100 mph = 155 km/h Jdorje 04:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

85 knots = 98 mph = 157 km/h Tropische Storm Sven 18:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Reanalysis
I noticed the updates, but the following should be the listed pressures:

Storm 1 - 987 mbar, based on the 70 kt winds at the time of the two 994 measurements (the rule of thumb is to knock 1 mb off for every 10 kt).

Storm 2 - 1012 mbar, based on the 35 kt winds at the time of the 1015 measurement (lowest while tropical).

Storm 3 - 1002 mbar, based on land obs (no closer measurements or wind data).

Storm 4 - 990 mbar, based on the 60 kt winds at the time of the 996 measurement.

CrazyC83 (talk) 14:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know where these come from, but I was moving things around while you were editing. I am done with this page, so it's safe to change them. Potapych (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I usedthe lowest pressures recorded in the raw data files from HURDAT. Unless you have a reliable source for those pressures, they can't be used as it is OR. (comment by Cyclonebiskit) 32.138.57.84 (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Crazy, do you know where those are from? The strongest storm is disputed between #1 and #4 (and I'm leaning toward #1). Potapych (talk) 01:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * They used the standard rules from the measurements in the Reanalysis files, although you're right, the ≤(listed lowest) makes more sense. CrazyC83 (talk) 18:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=110674286_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=2&currentPage=20
 * In 1925 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 02:52:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
 * In 1925 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-02 03:18:53, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=5113067_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0
 * In 1925 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 02:52:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
 * In 1925 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-02 03:19:05, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=7406313_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=5&currentPage=20
 * In 1925 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 02:52:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
 * In 1925 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-02 03:19:14, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:1925 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1924 Atlantic hurricane season

Todo
For some reason, in Hurricane 3, it lists Euros, but that currency wasn't around until the 1990s. That should be fixed. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 21:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, the source for the damages lists losses in Euros. Note the sign. Obviously, the Euro currency did not appear until the 1990s, but it is important to remain consistent with the source. CVW (Talk) 01:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * So a newspaper article written in 1924 would use a currency that wouldn't exist for over 70 years? That's almost as bad as saying that taxes raised by Rome in 100AD were in excess of US$50 million. The newspaper is clearly talking about £ (GBP) not € (EUR)... Fixed in article.--CycloneAlley (talk) 18:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I apologize; that was a severe mental lapse! It was difficult to discern the exact sign from the minute text. I'm familiar with the GBP symbol as well. CVW (Talk) 01:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://repository.wrclib.noaa.gov/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=nws_tech_memos
 * In 1924 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 02:50:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
 * In 1971 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 04:10:39, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
 * In 1924 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-02 03:15:13, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Mistake
The article says "The season was average with 11 tropical storms, three of which strengthened into hurricanes", when below we describe 5 hurricanes. Somebody could confirm and fix it?--KRLS (talk) 08:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Too: "two of those three"--KRLS (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:1924 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:Orange Line (Washington Metro)

Random Addition
Possibly add that the Orange Line is affectionally called the "Orange Crush", punning the fact the Orange line is overcrowed on weekdays.

Zidel333 05:53, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * A Google search does turn up the term, so your call. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Let's go for it. :) :Zidel333 00:13, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * It is 2023. I think it should be added now in the History section, mentioning that the "Orange Crush" phenomenon ended when the Silver Line opened (I was gonna add a new section on talk, but then I saw this) Fastfoodfanatic (talk) 13:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Couple passing suggestions
Got a couple suggestions for the article before the reviewer starts, since I have experience in the area. Racepacket, you might want to expand the lead with some history details. Also you might want to source the 2009 Boardings. You might want to add platform design and other stuff (accessibility, ticket machines, etc) to the table. Mitch 32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 15:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, you might want to move the future section above the station listing. Mitch 32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 15:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The 2009 Boardings are sourced to fn 19. If the table is a problem, I have no objection to removing it. Each station on the line has its own article describing the station's details. Racepacket (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Problem? I think the table is too small. I think you need to expand it a bit more. Mitch 32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 02:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 22 January 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Interested editors should comment in the consolidated discussion at Talk:Red Line (Washington Metro). (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Orange Line (Washington Metro) → Orange line (Washington Metro) – Lowercase the word “line” per WP:NCCAPS. The word “line is a generic descriptor. 2600:1700:1960:F100:A882:B52C:C11A:62E9 (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Red Line (Washington Metro) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Orange Line (Washington Metro)


text: Talk:1923 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1923 Atlantic hurricane season


text: Talk:1921 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1921 Atlantic hurricane season


text: Talk:1920 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1920 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1919 Atlantic hurricane season

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1851to2007_atl_reanal.txt
 * In 1919 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 02:46:27, 404 Not Found
 * In 1981 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 04:56:43, 404 Not Found
 * In 1919 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-02 02:54:09, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:1919 Atlantic hurricane season


text: Talk:1918 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1918 Atlantic hurricane season


text: Talk:1917 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1917 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:Blue Line (Washington Metro)

Untitled
I found this article, suggesting that there were (in 2001, at least) discussions to extend the Blue Line in order to have a Georgetown Metro Stop. Do you all think this is still on the mind of WMATA at all? Link: http://www.thehoya.com/news/103001/news4.cfm --Realbrvhrt 06:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * If it is, I think it's on the back burner, with the Silver Line considered more of a priority. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:33, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Oklahoma Ave/Kingman Lake Station???
Does anyone have any sources about the station they had originally planned to have between Stadium/Armory and Benning Rd? The site is still clear and there is a big parking lot constructed around the tracks. I heard they were thinking about finally completing it. --162.24.9.213 (talk) 03:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Added to history section. Racepacket (talk) 01:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Blue Line (Washington Metro). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100727163238/http://www.dullesmetro.com:80/about/overview.cfm to http://www.dullesmetro.com/about/overview.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Blue Line (Washington Metro). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abandonedrails.com/Alexandria_to_Bluemont
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?11%2C593894
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.labellemodels.com/manuals/Rosslyn%20Connecting.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://scripophily.net/rocoracovi19.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://ggwash.org/view/35475/the-metro-plan-has-changed-a-lot-since-1968
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost_historical/doc/146696896.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wmata.com/about/upload/history.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524184945/http://transit.schuminweb.com/transit/wmata/miscellaneous.php?category=july-4-service to http://transit.schuminweb.com/transit/wmata/miscellaneous.php?category=july-4-service
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101203023349/http://wmata.com/about_metro/docs/FY2009_Approved_Budget.pdf to http://wmata.com/about_metro/docs/FY2009_Approved_Budget.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wmata.com/about/news/pressreleasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=5186
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wmata.com/about/records/public_docs/upload/FY2015-Approved-Budget-Book.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://potomacyardmetro.com/index.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tripnet.org/state/VA/TBD_ABC7News_020811.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue Line (Washington Metro). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110806082244/http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/docs/PD_MCGP_Ped_Tunnel_Drawings_071405.pdf to http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/docs/PD_MCGP_Ped_Tunnel_Drawings_071405.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Previous right of way
I'm skeptical of this section on the former right-of-way for several reasons. First of all, much of it is sourced Trainorders posts, which aren't acceptable for use on Wikipedia. Second, it takes 8K of markup to write a short paragraph, which is beyond excessive. Third, two sentences require something like thirteen citations to support them, which is classic bombing. Mackensen (talk) 00:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

"Blue Line (Washington Metro" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blue_Line_(Washington_Metro&redirect=no Blue Line (Washington Metro] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 22 January 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Interested editors should comment in the consolidated discussion at Talk:Red Line (Washington Metro). (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Blue Line (Washington Metro) → Blue line (Washington Metro) – Lowercase the word “line” per WP:NCCAPS. The word “line is a generic descriptor. 2600:1700:1960:F100:A882:B52C:C11A:62E9 (talk) 02:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Red Line (Washington Metro) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Blue Line (Washington Metro)


text:
Talk:1915 Atlantic hurricane season

Major hurricane missing?
According to Metzgen and Cain (1925) (as cited by Gischler et al. (2008)) a major hurricane hit Belize on October 15, 1915. Why is this hurricane missing here? --bender235 (talk) 14:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:1915 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1916 Atlantic hurricane season

Incorrect Information
According to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/easyhurdat_5105.html#1902_3 (scroll down to 1916 storm 1) the information for storm 1 is incorrect. This is a reputable information source coming direct off of the noaa database. Please review the site and make the appropriate revisions. Storm was was not only not a 45 mph tropical storm; it was a Category 3! The track is completely incorrect and citation is poor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.121.48 (talk) 17:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

 * Actually, there was a recent reanalysis for that time period that uncovered a bunch of new storms, not to mention alter the existing storms. The storm you are thinking of is now Hurricane #2. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/1916.pdf
 * In 1916 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 02:44:15, Socket Error: 'No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it'
 * In 1916 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-02 02:46:19, Socket Error: 'No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it'

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

1916 Atlantic Hurricane 14
You can clearly see the track of the hurricane and the low on these maps, they even have a track line drawn.,, There is no other system there that absorbed the former hurricane. --Dual Freq (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * A reanalysis conducted in 2008 (large document) determined that the remnant of the hurricane was absorbed into a frontal boundary while over Illinois on October 19. The older surface analyses wouldn't be updated to reflect this change so it's easy to mix up. In situ analyses may have improperly depicted the systems for various reasons. The updated track map indicates the earlier dissipation. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 14:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

If that is the case, then I would think that it would at least be worth mentioning that the storms merged. --Dual Freq (talk) 14:49, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1916 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6bxpFoAqi?url=http://www.gobierno.pr/NR/rdonlyres/49EA64D0-305B-4881-8B85-04B518004BD5/0/Ciclones_en_PR.pdf to http://www.gobierno.pr/NR/rdonlyres/49EA64D0-305B-4881-8B85-04B518004BD5/0/Ciclones_en_PR.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1916 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080819193937/http://www.heritagewnc.org/WNC_natural_disasters/1916_flood.htm to http://www.heritagewnc.org/wnc_natural_disasters/1916_flood.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:1916 Atlantic hurricane season


text: Talk:1913 Atlantic hurricane season

title: Talk:1913 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1914 Atlantic hurricane season

Page Redone
This page looks better than before.Any questions? 70..122 is my school IP-i just change it into the username. Changes:

1) Storm has own section

2) ACE box created

3) Storm has own infobox

4) Storm has more information (I watched my grammar)

5) Page has button bar-I will move button bar to template when i get home. HurricaneCraze32

 * Nice work! I made some fixes. Oddly, this has the max winds of this TS at 60 knots, which would be 69 mph. Which is correct? -- RattleMan 18:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I found a site that said 50 mph.Shall we change the class from stub?HurricaneCraze32 18:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

 * Sure, I changed it from Stub to Start for now, but I'm not sure what else we can add to it now... -- RattleMan 18:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm just getting the button bar moved.I still cant figure out how to make the template-i do it by luck.A little help please.i've done it 4 times-and i keep forgetting how i do it.HurricaneCraze32 18:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

 * Never mind.Finished it.Thanks for the help. Lets stick with 50 mph-i found more proof with it.HurricaneCraze32 18:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

According to Hurdat, the storm peaked at 70 mph. In addition, the site says there were two other storms being investigated for inclusion in the database, but lack of tropical characteristics kept them removed. A way to expand the article would be to mention those two, if needed. Hurricanehink 19:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Fellas...the one, only, everlasting, official, single source for 1851-2005 Atlantic storms is the NHC best-track data. The main page to look at is http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/Data_Storm.html - this has links to the pages quoted by both Rattleman (though I think that page shows *landfalling* winds not peak winds, despite that they call it "max winds") and Hink. The link hink gives is good reading, but just looking at the easy-to-read data (listed in the link above) at http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/easyhurdat_5104.html#1914_1 will show you that the storm had 70 mph winds. — jdorje (talk) 19:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I really dont wanna set one until we decide on 1 wind speed. I added:"There is many arguments over what the actual wind speed of this storm and is still undecided." to the storm history.HurricaneCraze32 20:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

 * It's not undecided. The official Hurdat gives 70 mph, so that's what's going in. I changed it. Hurricanehink 21:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Be sure to add in the possible storms, mentioned by Hurdat. Also, try and use the raw data to provide more data for the lone storm. The raw data includes rainfall totals and wind speeds. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 00:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Importance
I put this as mid-importance, seeing as it was the least active Atlantic hurricane season in recorded history. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Failed GA

 * Well-written: Fair, some areas could do with a copyedit.
 * Factually accurate and verifiable: Source for no impact/deaths?
 * Broad in coverage: More info on TS One? Formation isn't clear, all the article says is that it formed east of FL. So? Plenty of storms from east of FL. Tropical Storm Tammy (2005) is a good example. Could be better re. impact - we're talking about 1914. I'm sure there's bound to be some impact information you can find.
 * NPOV: Pass
 * Stable: The edits to this article (see history) seem to come in bunches now and again, making quite significant additions. I'm not so sure on this point.
 * Images: Pass

There definitely should be more information out there you can find on TS-1. Especially if it was the only storm this season all documentations of the 1914 season should give ample information on it. Personally as a WPTC member I think this is far from GA class; it isn't even a B-class article. It needs quite a bit of work. – Chacor 02:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

 * Found on the Monthly Weather Review about winds and rain, but nothing on deaths.Mitchazenia (to be 9100+edits) 22:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Is it at least B-Class now?Mitchazenia (to be 9100+edits) 16:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Todo

 * 1) Correct the infobox. How do you know it was $0 in damage?
 * 2) Add the other storms that Hurdat mentioned as possible storms in the storms section
 * 3) Redo and organize the lede. Did the season officially start on June 1 and end on November 30 back then? Source needed for the season being one of only two seasons without a hurricane. Source is also needed for, "However, it is possible that there could have been other short lived storms in the Atlantic."
 * 4) Rewrite the storm history section of TS 1. What is HWM and COADS, and why is it important to the article? Unexplained acronyms are very bad. Is there any actual storm history for the storm? Where did it come from? Why did it move on its path? A storm that struck Georgia and later removed into the Gulf of Mexico is unusual. How did it happen?
 * 5) The second paragraph of TS 1 should be rewritten as well. It should go in order of area. It is written that it produced rainfalls across the Atlantic and Gulf Coast states. That sentence means that the storm dropped precipitation from Maine to Texas. Is that correct? You only provide two locations for rainfall totals, and both are in Florida. Did you mean it only produced rainfall on the one state that borders the Atlantic and Gulf Coast? How can one "find rainfalls". First, rainfall is generally a singular noun, and second, you don't normally find it. You record it, report it, some other verb that makes more sense. Saying the Miami Herald reported... is confusing. When I read that, I expect to see impact in Miami, not Saint Augustine. Does who report it make a difference for something as small as the minor impact there? "Tons of dead grasses and marshes were blown away around the city." Do you mean actual tons, as in several thousand pounds of dead grass (grass is generally a singular noun, as well)? That seems pretty unusual, as grass and marsh don't weigh that much. A ton would be a lot of grass and marsh to be blown around. Is there any more info on that event? "No damage was reported in the area due to prior warnings." Whoa, that's weird. You never mentioned prior warnings, and what about the tons of grass and marsh? Surely that would count as damage, especially if one ton of that fell on someone. Additionally, prior warning doesn't usually affect the damage; it affects the deaths.
 * 6) In the third paragraph- "The storm caused minimal damage, and there were no reported fatalities." How is that possible? In the infobox, it says 0 damage and unknown fatalities. Something's not right.

Overall, it needs a fresh rewrite, more info, and better grammar and word choice. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 19:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I say put rewrite on hold because you suggestions are problematic.

This is not a modern storm, the only actual storm history is the one written in the MWR and searching on the internet for more SH is useless b/c it problaby wasnt detected untill it was off the coast of georgia. (remember there TC obervation back then was limited to ship reports). The Why did it move on its path and how did it happen is compeletly unncesary unless its specificly mentions in the MWR (which is possbily the Only source) that has any info about the storm.
 * 1) We cant put those storms in the article because the NHC has not verify them yet.
 * 2) As far as i can know, the NHC considers that the AHS starts June 1 and ends Nov 30 regardless of time period.
 * 3) Hink you stated. "Is there any actual storm history for the storm? Where did it come from? Why did it move on its path? A storm that struck Georgia and later removed into the Gulf of Mexico is unusual. How did it happen?"
 * 1) There nothing wrong in the info box. unknown fatalies is the same as no reported fatalies and 0 damage means that there was no damage to structures or roads, etc (altough that can be subst with minimal.

thats all i have to say for now. Storm05 13:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Definitely not! Minimal damage ≠ no damage. You're missing Hink's point. A cite is needed for the fact that "it is possible that there could have been other short lived storms in the Atlantic." He's not asking for citations of said storms as you seem to think. Secondly, your claim about "regardless of time period" is incorrect, the AHS might not have been defined by dates back in 1914, or indeed there may not have been a formal "hurricane season" at all. – Chacor 14:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * incorrect!- the Atlantic hurricane season as defined by the National Hurricane Center runs from June 1 to Novmember 30 regardeless of the period. Storm05 14:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The NHC did not exist in 1914. Their definition may not be applicable to before the time they did not exist. Please provide a RELIABLE SOURCE for your assertion. – Chacor 14:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * IT DOESNT MATTTER if the NHC doesnt exist!, their criteria of the AHS statrting on June 1 and ending on Nov 30. applies to ALL seasons, even the ones before the NHC even existed!. Storm05 15:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:CIV. And how can their criteria apply to a period when they had no control? WP:NOR, this would constitute original research by claiming so. Find a source. – Chacor 15:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * To go off topic a minute- Hink, i got #1 done. I can't do #2 until this argument subsides. HWM is Historical Weather Maps. COADS i do not know of. Rainfalls in other states- i do not know of. Only Florida had impact.Mitchazenia (9200+edits) 14:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

No, we don't need a whole section for extratropical storms that weren't part of the season. Just mention in the lede about the storms that HURDAT mention are being looked at for inclusion. – Chacor 15:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

 * 1 as in Todo Task 1, but oh well. I have added the storms to the intro.Mitchazenia (9200+edits) 18:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, the "possible storms" should be removed. The link provided mentions that they were extratropical systems (with the second system "perhaps" but not "definitely" being a TD). Extratropical cyclones and tropical disturbances that aren't declared tropical depressions or higher are not part of the hurricane season, whether they're mentioned in the report or not, and don't belong in the article. --Core desat  23:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

 * I think the original point made by Hink here is that being 1914, there could've been storms missed, and that needs a citation, not about storms that happened and are known that were not included in HURDAT, which is what Mitchazenia has re-written the statement to read. – Chacor 00:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

 * If you want me to remove them- I'll be very happy to remove them.Mitchazenia (9200+edits) 00:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Newer issues
Shouldn't that be listed at 2007 in the refs, not 1914? HURDAT didn't predate the 1960's. Also, COADS or ICOADS for the ship database? One should be chosen for the red wikilinks, because only one article will be created for the project, ultimately. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed the years. Storm05 (talk) 13:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Storm o5, renominate for GA then. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox Happy Veterans day 17:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

 * There's no need to rehash the old argument about "June through November" for a season which predates an official dedicated agency monitoring the basin. Late spring to mid-autumn should suffice.  Thegreatdr (talk) 23:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:1914 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1912 Atlantic hurricane season

Possible Record
I looked at the Best Track, in here and I noticed a unique record set by this year. The 7th and final storm of this year reached major hurricane status on November 17, and I think that marks the latest date for the season's first major hurricane to form in the Atlantic Basin. I think this should be mentioned in the article. Does anyone else agree on this? Rye998 (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:1912 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1911 Atlantic hurricane season

Map inclusion
Map inclusion is a great idea for the pre-satellite era, like what was done with the first three storms. At least two more should be able to be added for the last couple storms, no? Thegreatdr (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * As I recall, for the three remaining storms the issue was either that the storm didn't come within range of the NOAA central library maps or there was simply nothing worth looking at on the surface analysis. I'll take another look, though. Juliancolton (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Found another source for decent surface maps. I'll upload them shortly. Thanks for the reminder/suggestion. Juliancolton (talk) 21:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. Inconsistency can plague GAN/FAC candidates.  Best to nip it in the bud early.  At least for an article this old, there shouldn't be copyright restrictions on images included.  Thegreatdr (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Understood. I got the maps for #s 4 and 5, but for TS 6 the most impressive map available consists of one broadly closed isobar. Would you say it's worth adding? Juliancolton (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * For consistency sake, yeah. It was a relatively weak tropical storm, so it's not going to look impressive.  Thegreatdr (talk) 01:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1911 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604063810/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/metadata_master.html to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/metadata_master.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:1911 Atlantic hurricane season


text:
Talk:1910 Atlantic hurricane season

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1910 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6bxpFoAqi?url=http://www.gobierno.pr/NR/rdonlyres/49EA64D0-305B-4881-8B85-04B518004BD5/0/Ciclones_en_PR.pdf to http://www.gobierno.pr/NR/rdonlyres/49EA64D0-305B-4881-8B85-04B518004BD5/0/Ciclones_en_PR.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:1910 Atlantic hurricane season


text: User talk:68.85.154.125

title: User talk:68.85.154.125