text:
63 Andromedae

63 Andromedae (abbreviated 63 And) is an Alpha2 Canum Venaticorum (α2 CVn) variable star in the constellation Andromeda. Its variable star designation is PZ Andromedae. With an apparent magnitude of about 5.6, it is bright enough to be seen by naked eye. Based upon an annual parallax shift of $3.07$, it is located 382 light years away.

The spectral type of this star is B9VpSi, indicating that it is a chemically peculiar main sequence star with abnormally strong silicon lines. Although it has a B-type spectral class, this type of star is known as an Ap star, a class of stars with very strong spectral lines of certain heavy elements and strong magnetic fields. The chemical peculiarities are caused by stratification in the atmosphere due to slow rotation.

The star has 3 times the mass of the Sun and 2.4 times the Sun's radius. It is radiating 110 times the Sun's luminosity from its photosphere at an effective temperature of 11,967 K.

63 Andromedae varies in brightness by about 0.05 magnitudes with a period of 4.189 days. This is believed to occur as it rotates. This type of variable star is known as an α2 Canum Venaticorum variable after the first example to be studied.

To the naked eye the star figures as a faint, dense asterism with 64 and 65 Andromedae (southwest and west), which together justify a rectangular projection (extreme) of the constellation (official boundaries). North, west and east are an arm/hand, fictitiously and geometrically, of Perseus, whose character is related in traditional mythology as Andromeda's saviour, saving her from the sea monster, who forever retreats to beyond Pisces, Cetus. The closest star in the asterisms commonly drawn up to represent the princess herself is 51 Andromedae, to the east. At an apparent magnitude of 3.57, this star shines two magnitudes or 6.3 times brighter.

title: 63 Andromedae


text:
Talk:Marwari horse

Image

 * Be useful to find a photo of those ears. Maybe something on Flickr?  Some stuff there is Ok to upload, some not... takes some getting used to the site to find the cc-2.0 and other acceptable images, but doable (go to Wikimedia commons, click upload file and read the stuff about uploading an image from Flickr to figure out what to do).  Another interesting thing would be to find out how many Marwari horses are in India and outside of India, add in some statistics, and citations where you located info (careful not to add advertising links though)  Good luck. Montanabw 02:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Edit move
This bit was unsourced and appears to be original research, but there may be something in it of use, so moving it to the talk page here in case someone can verify and incorporate it. Montanabw (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC) -- Western vandalist historians and indian anti Maratha elements states that this breed is not of Indian origin and badtard offshoot of Arabian horde. Very untrue and vandalism. I was in search of our local Maratha horde breed Bhimthadi horde. Due to vast urbanisation its number is reduced. But i have seen some horse possesed by Dhangar tribse and other nomadic tribse of Maharashtra. Their small but standing and moveing ears attracted my attention. The breed seems too much hardy and i wondered that what food, care may have provided to them. When i was a boy in my home villege we had a horse of this breed and i still remembers the hardy few rides with him. I think that the present Marwari horse breed is originated from Male horse of this Maharashtra breed and female of Arabian horse. Edit summary was to "-- Vishal1976"

Dear you are wrong for detail information you should visit jodhpur and if you just want to know origen of marwari horses then read book "Marwari The Prince of deasart" in that you can read an artical of K.N. Joshi (lal Ji) he is my father from there u can know HOW,WHEN & why marwaris are made/breed---Gaurav Joshi(National Endurance Ride Champion, World,s youngster trick rider (with sindhi-marwari horse)

 * What you do not understand about Dana's edits is that wikipedia requires Verification of information. It also requires a Neutral point of view and does not allow Someone's unpublished views to be considered as source material.  It also helps if you spell correctly and avoid insulting people.   Montanabw (talk) 04:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of sourced material
Please do not delete sourced material from this article without a better explanation than what was provided in the edit summaries of the two prior deletions. If you believe there is incorrect material here, then take it to this talk page and explain it. Also be ready to provide verifiable sources, not just your own statements. As it sits, the article's sources are deemed reliable and reputable, so if there were good faith errors, they need to be explained here. Please DO NOT just keep removing this material from the article. Montanabw (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

"Tend to be the most popular"
Is 'popular' really the best choice of word in this case? Popular, by it's definition, means favoured. What do you mean here, favoured by nature? That only makes sense if you view Nature as an entity, and as Wikipedia is supposed to be unbiased, the article cannot take that viewpoint. I recommend changing 'popular' to something like 'dominant'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.254.54 (talk) 19:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This means the most popular with buyers/breeders, not the most dominant in nature. I have reverted your edit, since pinto colors are not the most dominant in nature. Dana boomer (talk) 19:48, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Images
For future references, happened to come across this:File:Rajasthan Horses, Village east of Jodhpur (2).jpg. Looks like a weanling Marwari foal to me. Montanabw (talk) 05:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It's most likely a Marwari, but could also be a Kathiawari - they have the funky ears too, but aren't usually found in that part of India. That's why I haven't added it in so far. Dana boomer (talk) 10:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Those ears are the darnedest thing!  Montanabw (talk) 21:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Grammar and style
Can some experienced editors please copy edit this article for grammar and style. Some of the sentences are just too long and am not able to comprehend in a few places. I have to read the same sentence a few times to get its meaning. Featured Articles are supposed to be some of the best in Wikipedia. If a layman is not able to understand an article then it destroys the purpose of an encyclopedia.
 * Will you please elaborate on some of the areas where you are having trouble? I've done a bit of work to the article since your edits earlier today - perhaps these have fixed some of the issues? Dana boomer (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I find somethings wrong with a few sentences, mainly in the history section. Some of them are
 * The breed was on the verge of extinction until the intervention of Maharaja Umaid Singhji in the first half of the 20th century saved the Marwari.

What was his work, What did he do?

 * This ban was partially lifted in 1999, when a small number of indigenous horses could be exported after receiving a special license. Over the next seven years, 21 horses were exported, until, in 2006, licenses stopped being granted. In 2008, the Indian government began granting licenses for "temporary exports" of up to one year, to allow horses to be exhibited in other countries.

Why is the ban being put and lifted?

What is the first breed standards.
 * The pair worked with other experts from the Indigenous Horse Society to develop the first breed standards.

The time line in the history section is also confusing. First there is the talk about the British,Maharaja Umaid Singhji and the bans put and lifted till 2009. Then again it goes back to 1995 about the works of Kelly. I think the events should either be re arranged according to the time line or put under different subdivisions.

Naveed (talk) 06:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for elaborating. To answer your questions: 1) I don't know what Maharaja Umaid Singhji did; I haven't been able to find additional source information on this. I'm assuming he probably established breeding programs and searched to find what purebred bloodstock was left, but this is just conjecture. 2) Over concerns about rareness. Added a bit. 3) The physical breed standards are described in the Characteristics section, which is standard for equine breed articles. 4) I've moved some things around in the history section to make it a bit more chronological. I want to keep all of the export information together, so it's still a bit jumpy, but I think it's better now. Dana boomer (talk) 21:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Looks much better now. Thanks for your contributions. Naveed (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Interpretation & Iconography
An editor added the following, which might be OK to add in terms of a myths or similar section (we have a "mythology" section in the Arabian horse article, for example). But the content needs sources checked to see if they are actually about this breed or just horses in general, plusproper formatting using citation templates, as this is a featured article and requires the best sources and meticulously correct formatting. Montanabw (talk) 05:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

---
 * Iconography

The Marwari horse is a symbolic icon in Hinduism. He is one of the Vahanas, paths of flowing spiritual energies and was considered to be an animal of divine status.

Ears turned inward towards each other, a peculiarity unique to the Marwari horse, represent the balanced energies of the consciousness (yoni or yin) and the maya (linga or yang).

Whorls down the neck represent the chakra wheels of energy along the spinal cord.

The Marwari's characteristic, evenly four-footed gait represents the Swastika, Tantric symbol of the Dance of Energy immortalized by Shiva Nataraja - Lord of Ecstatic (creative) Dance. Each whirling arm of the swastika represents one of the four creative forces of Hinduism:  Creation, Destruction, Manifestation, Disappearance. {See Wikipedia article on Shakti}

In Vastu Shastra, seven ambling horses is an iconic symbol for the Wheel of Artha (financial success). This superstition arose from the Legend of the Seven Shipwrecked Horses of Marwar. Seven (saptan) is a lucky number in Hinduism. Isobel Chaveh (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

 * Thanks for removing it and starting a discussion. It appears to be mostly original research, and most of the sources appear unreliable. --Ronz (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)--Ronz (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Vastu Shastra - A running horse painting is said to ensure financial success; the horses must be seven in number.Isobel Chaveh (talk) 00:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Isobel Chaveh (talk) 00:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

About Marwari page edits.
Hi Montanabw,

I'm sorry for writing after an year from your last message. In fact I'm still trying to balance my personal life and career. anyway back to point, I've made some edits on page Marwari Horses because some points are not accurate in that page. Still those points stays uncorrected in wiki. I'm a Marwari Breeder and those information I added in wiki are % correct aout Marwari horses.Also the history of Marwari horse are not complete until the its root goes to Akhal-Teke, this breed heavily influenced Marwari horses in history to gain its height & confirmation. those points are still missing in page and I wish to update those in page.

There is no Pony breed in India have inward curved ears, its came from Kathiawari horses, the only pure horse breed in India. all other breeds including Sindhi & Marwari came from Kathiawari horses by fine breeding with other breeds like Akhal-Teke and Arabian. this breed doesn't have any trace to any other horse breeds and its not a pure breed too. but Kathiawari horses are pure and and its DNA reports didn't traces any root to any other horse breeds (I personally didn't checked the report but got information from a seminar of Indigenous Horse Society of India).

Also pure Marwari horse doesn't have height above 16H, No Marwari horses stand above 16H before year 2000. By mixing with TB and again breed with Marwari/Kathiawari can produce Marwari look like horses but those horses doesn't have any ability like pure Marwari has, Even they cannot go for 5Kms.

Hope we can talk more about Marwari Horses if you wish, Please put back those edits to wikipage and allow me to edit page with more accurate details.

Regards,

Rashvin Mohammed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashvin.wiki (talk • contribs) 20:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Anything you add here has to be sourced to a reliable source. Please feel free to provide us URL links to appropriate sources or tell us about printed books that verify what you propose to add. Montanabw (talk) 20:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marwari horse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081230072119/http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/horses/marwari/index.htm to http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/horses/marwari/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marwari horse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524010359/http://www.friendsofmarwari.org.uk/_docs/Nagmag.pdf to http://www.friendsofmarwari.org.uk/_docs/Nagmag.pdf
 * Added tag to http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/raja.html?c=y&page=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marwari horse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605144723/http://www.horsemanmagazine.com/2008/08/marwari-horse/ to http://www.horsemanmagazine.com/2008/08/marwari-horse/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:32, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Color Name Difference
In reading the article, I noticed that the introductory paragraph lists "piebald and skewbald" as potential colors. This is British terminology that refers directly to the colors on a horse rather than to the actual potential color patterns possible, and isn't used outside of Britain. The Marwari has tobiano, but there are patterns that are certainly not in the breed, such as frame, which is a New World mutation, and other patterns like sabino, white spotting, and splash are currently of unknown status. If possible, could we change the 'piebald and skewbald' piece to specifically pinto to keep with current scientific and equestrian usages?

BlitzarExotics (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The article uses Indian English; for obvious historical reasons, that is closely similar to British English. Piebald and skewbald are correct terms for the appearance of the coat, which is what is described here. What's your source for the statements you make, by the way? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Marwari horse


text:
47 Andromedae

47 Andromedae is a binary star system in the northern constellation of Andromeda. The designation is from the star catalogue of John Flamsteed, first published in 1712. The system has a combined apparent visual magnitude of 5.60, which is just bright enough to be faintly visible to the naked eye under good seeing conditions. The distance to this system, as determined from an annual parallax shift of 15.9805 mas, is about 204 light years. It is moving away from the Sun with a heliocentric radial velocity of +13.3 km/s.

The binary nature of this system was discovered by John Stanley Plaskett and Reynold Kenneth Young in 1919 using radial velocity measurements taken from Photographic plates obtained at Dominion Astrophysical Observatory in Saanich, British Columbia, Canada. It is a double-lined spectroscopic binary with an orbital period of 35.4 days and an eccentricity of 0.65. The components appear to be nearly identical Am stars, with a magnitude difference of 0.05. The combined stellar classification is A1m.

title: 47 Andromedae


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel4.cc

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Ryan Norton T 20:39, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Channel4.cc
Doesn't meet notability requirements for WP:MUSIC. Probably vanity. --Whitejay251 02:42, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. - Whitejay251 02:43, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn vanity CLW 13:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom - Bwfc 12:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
5 Andromedae

5 Andromedae is a single, yellow-white hued star in the northern constellation of Andromeda. Its designation comes from a catalogue of stars by English astronomer John Flamsteed, published in 1712. The star is faintly visible to the naked eye, having an apparent visual magnitude of 5.68. Based upon an annual parallax shift of 29.12 mas as seen from Earth, it is located 112 light years away. 5 Andromedae is moving closer to the Sun with a radial velocity of −2.6 km/s. It has a relatively high proper motion, advancing across the celestial sphere at the rate of 0.201 arc seconds per year.

This is an ordinary F-type main-sequence star with a stellar classification of F5 V. It is estimated to be 2.3 billion years old and is spinning with a projected rotational velocity of 9.7 km/s. The star has 1.39 times the mass of the Sun. It is radiating 5.6 times the Sun's luminosity from its photosphere at an effective temperature of about 6,605 K.

Within Andromeda it is the second of a northerly chain asterism – 7, 8, 11 are further south-westward, with 3 Andromedae in the other direction.

title: 5 Andromedae


text:
Talk:Cross-strait relations

Requested move 19 February 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Closed speedily, per previous move request. (non-admin closure) CMD (talk) 02:41, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Cross-Strait relations → China–Taiwan relations – User:Dosafrog was inactive since February 8, do you want to oppose and support? 142.112.224.196 (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

 * Speedy close: Exact same Move Request was proposed by the same IP 11 days ago. — Golden  call me maybe? 17:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy close per Golden. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Change title to "Taiwan-China relations"
Can we change the title from "Cross-Strait relations" to "Taiwan-China relations." I feel that the title should contain the word "Taiwan" because it is an article about Taiwan and it helps get the point across that Taiwan is an independent country and not apart of mainland China. BroxigarTheRed (talk) 10:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

 * X mark.svg Not done : This has been discussed numerous times; see above. — Manti  core  10:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @Manticore The main points of opposition and their resolutions are as follows:
 * "the standard naming scheme doesn't work well because both claim to be China. Taiwan is the colloquial name, it is officially known as the Republic of China" @O.N.R
 * The english Wikipedia article for "Republic of China" redirects to "Taiwan". According to that article, this "colloquial" name first appeared in the Book of Sui around 636. According to WP:COMMONNAME, "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's official name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used". Also, the DPP and its supporters do not claim that their island of residence is China. Your assertion that "both claim to be China" does not represent the views of all inhabitants of that island.
 * "Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NPOV" @Mx. Granger
 * It is reasonable to say that the vast majority of people who were born and raised in english speaking countries, who en.wikipedia.org services, refer to this island in question as "Taiwan". My hunch is that the vast majority of these people do not confer political meaning to the name "Taiwan". How would one argue that "Taiwan" is not a commonly recognized, apolitical name among english speakers in english-speaking countries?
 * "the proposed title implies pretty strongly that Taiwan is not China" @BarrelProof
 * Other people may perceive the proposed title implies that Taiwan is a part of China trying to gain independence. Yet other people may perceive the proposed title implies something else.
 * "we have a WP:COMMONNAME name for the relations" @CMD
 * If you google or scholar.google "cross strait relations" you will find "china taiwan relations" in the resulting link titles and descriptions. If you google or scholar.google "china taiwan relations" you will find "cross strait relations" in the resulting link titles and descriptions. However, the mapping from "cross strait relations" to "china taiwan relations" occurs much more frequently than it does in the other direction. This suggests that for english speakers, "china taiwan relations" is actually the more common expression. Chino-Catane (talk) 22:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * U.S. President Eisenhower visited TAIWAN 美國總統艾森豪於1960年6月訪問臺灣台北時與蔣中正總統-2.jpg

Proposed merger

 * 2022 Chinese military exercises around Taiwan → Cross-Strait relations
 * 2023 Chinese military exercises around Taiwan → Cross-Strait relations

 * Neither of these articles meet Wikipedia's notability requirements for events. Rather than see them deleted, I propose that they be merged into this article. Thebiguglyalien  ( talk ) 23:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Support. The sort of fragmentation that exists currently should be avoided if possible, and it is certainly possible. JArthur1984 (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Why don't you think it's notable? Seems widely covered, internationally. In any case, this is not the best merge target. I'd suggest merging the 2022 page to 2022 visit by Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan. The title says "visit", but like most events, direct reactions and consequences are part of the topic. I'm not as sure about 2023, but I wonder if the main author Rexxx7777 has any thoughts about keeping all the good content which is already there while mildly rearranging more of the focus to be on the 2023 visit by Tsai Ing-wen to the United States, since it's all interconnected but that's the more distinctive feature of the event. (Just an idea, not a strong opinion about that one.) With respect to a page as broad as Cross-Strait relations, it's good WP:SUMMARYSTYLE not to try to merge everything here. Adumbrativus (talk) 02:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I feel these can all be their own independent wikis. I disagree that there are no "notable" aspects to these pages, since it’s pretty obvious that these events, which involve tensions between two countries, is pretty notable to be its own page. Rexxx7777 (talk) 03:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * "News cycle" events aren't notable just because they happened per WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Thebiguglyalien  ( talk ) 14:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Oppose very specifically. Suspect they could be merged somewhere (or together? De-disambiguate Chinese military exercises around Taiwan?), but that level of detail wouldn't fit into this page. CMD (talk) 03:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment – Should 2022 Chinese military exercises around Taiwan be merged, 2022 visit by Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan would be a better target. DecafPotato (talk) 06:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose - These are very specific time-bound events. Amigao (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Oppose - What @Amigao said.
 *  Brachy 08  (Talk)  (Contribs)  08:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Oppose - These are time/date-specific event, same like the three Taiwan Strait Crisis which had happened before. Each of this individual event is really notable. Of course in a bigger picture, they are part of Cross-Strait Relations, but it can have its own standalone article because they are very notable (you can easily find hundred of news covering these events). Chongkian (talk) 04:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Oppose - Both events are widely covered and recognised as different events, similar to the way the Taiwan Strait crisises are talked about. I think they are too significant to just merge into something general like Cross-Straight relations. None of the Taiwan Straight Crisises have been merged into the Cross-Straight relations page, because they were significant as well. MysticForce07

 * Oppose - What others have said. Both events are quite notable and merit being documented in their own articles. These are date-specific, significant events on-par with the significance of the prior Taiwan Strait Crises. The August 2022 episode alone is even ranked as being just as or more consequential than the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis of 1995-96 by multiple sources. There's far too much information that could be documented from both events to be effectively redirected into a small section within this page. If there is to be a merger, the 2022 and 2023 "military exercise" articles should be consolidated into one article, instead of simply being redirected. 69.196.41.13 (talk) 20:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

 * Oppose - Both articles are noteworthy. 2001:8003:908F:BB01:9D41:3FED:CFE2:17D9 (talk) 13:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 14 June 2024 (about capitalization)

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: pages moved, absent any strong opposition.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 16:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

– MOS:CAPS and MOS:HYPHENCAPS. The words "strait" and "cross" are not proper nouns and should not be capitalized. Google Ngrams show that the term "cross-straight relations" is not consistently capitalized in sources. Previous discussion indicate that vague shortened names should not be capitalized merely to indicate significance – see MOS:SIGNIFCAPS and the fairly recent discussions at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 227  and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 13. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 06:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Cross-Strait relations → Cross-strait relations
 * History of Cross-Strait relations → History of cross-strait relations
 * Cross-Strait charter → Cross-strait charter
 * 2004 Taiwanese cross-Strait relations referendum → 2004 Taiwanese cross-strait relations referendum
 * Cross-Strait propaganda → Cross-strait propaganda
 * Cross-Strait high-level talks → Cross-strait high-level talks

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per overwhelming lowercase usage stats. Dicklyon (talk) 00:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment these should all use "cross-Taiwan Strait relations"/etc. The way it looks now, it should be about the relations between Singapore and Malaysia. Or England and France. Or Alaska/Siberia. Or Denmark-Norway -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 04:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * That sounds logical. But sources don't much agree.  Do you have reason to believe that "cross-strait" is commonly used in relation to some of those other straits? Seems unlikely. Dicklyon (talk) 05:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * They need the context of the article/book that the term in used in. If there is no context (such as the title used in a general encyclopedia, and not a Taiwan-topics encyclopedia), there is ambiguity. In the context of the Strait of Malacca: "Deep Waters, Close Quarters: Malaysia and Singapore’s Cross-Strait Disputes", The Diplomat (2018); The Cross-Strait Traffic in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: An Impediment to Safe Navigation? -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 21:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Neutral My instinct was to strongly oppose this, but it seems The Economist, NYT, and Reuters (mostly) lowercase "strait". On the other hand, I must point out that the two Ngrams links provided above are far from conclusive – in 1997 they show the lowercase "strait" far above any other option, but the most recent numbers are quite close together. I guess I support this, but I don't like the way the Ngrams evidence has been presented above. I certainly oppose any move to add disambiguators lile "Taiwan Strait" as unnecessary; "cross-strait relations" is a longstanding phrase and the common name of this topic. Toadspike   [Talk]  11:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I also think MOS:SIGNIFCAPS doesn't apply here. Strait wasn't capitalized for emphasis, it was capitalized because it was seen as a proper noun. However, the other discussions cited are relevant, as is MOS:GEOUNITS. Toadspike   [Talk]  11:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * What's "seen as a proper name" should be guided by MOS:CAPS, which says Wikipedia relies on sources to determine what is conventionally capitalized; only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia. Dicklyon (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cross-strait relations


text: User talk:204.191.180.197

title: User talk:204.191.180.197


text:
Talk:Ferrite (magnet)

Untitled
Could someone add information about history of ferrites - for how long they have been known? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.30.185.128 (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

there are many references to nickel and zinc in ferrites. Are these wrong?

rai69:

"Today, they are the most commonly used magnets in radios. The maximum magnetic field B is about 0.35 tesla and the magnetic field strength H is about 30 to 160 kiloampere turns per meter (400 to 2000 oersteds). (Hill 2006)"

Sorry but in my opinion these must be old informations; with actual (2007) numeric values it would be: The maximum magnetic field B is about 0.43 tesla and the magnetic field strength H is about 30 to 360 kiloampere turns per meter (not doped)and B is about 0,44 tesla, H is about 380 kA/m for doped materials.

Maybe, somebody with better command of English than me could change this in the articel.

i hate u all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.195.7.61 (talk) 12:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

should Chemie.de get a mention, as the majority of this information was ripped off, word for word, from their site? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.195.77.146 (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

 * I am quite sure none of this information was "ripped off, word for word" from chemie.de. Amongst other things, chemie.de has no English on it whatsoever; furthermore, I can make out from what litle German I know that the information is not even similar in phrasing and formatting. 75.95.99.15 (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

"They are the most commonly used magnets in radios." Huh? Where, exactly? In the speakers? Needs clarification. 209.145.162.138 (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)bplipschitz

NiZn Chem formula
i have been looking up ratios of atoms by looking at the chem formulas. it does appear that the NiZn formula is incorrect, unlike the simularity between mixes in hard ferrites of strontium and barium, the MnZn and NiZn are not the same. NiZn is quite approximate being NiZnFe4O4, while the MnZn is a mix of Fe2O2 (52%), MnO (25%) and ZnO (23%), this is an average. the source of my averages are: Wei Zhu, "On Preparation of High Permeability Mn-Zn Ferrite" and the NiZn formula is reasonably common on the 'net though some lack the "O4". i did find another book (Physics for Engineers By M R Srinivasan) to double check once more, that lists them as follows: 48%MnO Fe2O3, 52%ZnO Fe2O3 and 36%NiO Fe2O3, 64%ZnOFe2O3 showing a minor descrepency with the former source. it could just be the lack of available information that has lead people to beleive that NiZn is stoich...Charlieb000 (talk) 00:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Rare properties?
The article states that ferrite is "one of the few substances that combine these two properties," being both magnetic and electrically insulating. But is this really true? I'm a magnet scientist and I know of all sorts of insulating magnets. Lots of rare earth oxide magnets are both magnetic and insulating, due to the localized 4f orbitals. Same goes for 4d and 5d, I think. I'm going to take out that sentence unless anyone objects. And if you do object, could you find a source that supports the claim or make an argument of why it belongs?Tedsanders (talk) 18:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I actually put that in. I appreciate your bringing up the rare earth oxide magnets; I didn't know that.  I guess I wrote that to alert general readers that those two properties are the reason for the widespread use of ferrites.   Although I take your point, ferrites are certainly the most common materials which are ferromagnetic and nonconductive; most other common ferromagnetic materials are metals.  The combination of those two properties are the reason for soft ferrites' use in the electronics industry.  So I'd like to put something in the introduction to that effect. -- Chetvorno TALK 19:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ferrite (magnet). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120514152507/http://www.arnoldmagnetics.com/Ferrite.aspx to http://www.arnoldmagnetics.com/Ferrite.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201172918/http://www.cpc-us.com/products/barium-carbonate.html to http://www.cpc-us.com/products/barium-carbonate.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ferrite (magnet)


text:
User talk:EasyCheese

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - and never had so much been owed by so many to so few. DS 02:43, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

....*Snigger*

Oi
Someone's been editing my user page.. hmm. Who could that possibly be..? Neverender 899 13:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:EasyCheese


text:
56 Andromedae

56 Andromedae, abbreviated 56 And, is a probable binary star system in the northern constellation of Andromeda. 56 Andromedae is the Flamsteed designation. It has a combined apparent visual magnitude of 5.69, which is just bright enough to be dimly visible to the naked eye under good seeing conditions. The distance to this system can be ascertained from its annual parallax shift, measured at $61.77$ with the Gaia space observatory, which yields a separation of 330 light years. It is moving further from the Earth with a heliocentric radial velocity of +62 km/s and is traversing the celestial sphere at a relatively high rate of $1.34$ per year. This pair is positioned near the line of sight to the open cluster NGC 752, located 458 pc away.

The brighter primary is an aging giant star with a stellar classification of K0 III, having exhausted the hydrogen at its core and evolved off the main sequence. It is a red clump giant, having undergone "helium flash" and is presently generating energy at its core through helium fusion. The star is about 3.1 billion years old with a negligible observable rotation rate, so the rotation axis of the star is likely pointing towards us. It has 1.3 times the mass of the Sun and has expanded to 11 times the Sun's radius The star is radiating 56 times the Sun's luminosity from its enlarged photosphere at an effective temperature of 4,765 K.

The faint secondary component is a magnitude 11.93 star located at an angular separation of $4,765$ along a position angle (PA) of 77°, as of 2001. This has changed little since 1903 when it was at a separation of $2.58$ along a PA of 80°.

title: 56 Andromedae


text:
44 Andromedae

44 Andromedae is a single, yellow-white hued star in the northern constellation of Andromeda. 44 Andromedae is the Flamsteed designation. It has an apparent visual magnitude of approximately 5.67, which indicates it is a dim star that is just visible to the naked eye on a dark night. The annual parallax shift as measured by the Hipparcos spacecraft is 18.8145 mas, which yields a distance estimate of around 173 light years. It is moving closer to the Sun with a radial velocity of −14 km/s.

This star has been assigned a stellar classification of F8 V, which indicates it is an ordinary F-type main-sequence star. However, Gray et al. (2001) gave it a class of F9 IV, suggesting it is instead a subgiant star that is evolving away from the main sequence as the hydrogen fuel at its core becomes exhausted. It is an estimated 2.6 billion years old and is rotating with a period of 15.2 days. The star has 1.64 times the mass of the Sun and 3.6 times the Sun's radius. It is radiating 13 times the Sun's luminosity from its photosphere at an effective temperature of 6,028 K. It appears overluminous for a star of its type which may indicate the presence of a bright companion, but no radial velocity variation has been detected.

title: 44 Andromedae


text:
User talk:Red Octorok

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - and you might want to read the "Ask Me About Being A Wikipedia Administrator" thread on Ask/Tell. DS 02:44, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian Chandler

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Christian Chandler, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. noq (talk) 14:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism
You have editing three articles, all three edits being vandalism. The next vandalism edit lead to your being blocked from editing here.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:53, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Red Octorok


text:
User talk:Aaron Monse

Welcome from EWS23
Hello ! My name is Eric, and it is my pleasure to be the first to welcome you to Wikipedia! I hope you will decide to stay a long time and help us continue to make this one of the greatest sites on the world wide web. Here are a few useful links for you to explore: In addition to that great wealth of knowledge, let me offer you this advice: do what you enjoy! If you enjoy contributing to sports articles, do so! If you like to correct typoes (...), write new articles, find better ways to organize articles, make useful templates, work on projects with others, or even welcome new members, do so! A happy member of our community is a productive member of our community. You can read all of the above links to the last word, or you can jump right into editing. Be bold!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have the need to sign a page without the time and date, you can use three tildes. If you have any questions that aren't easily found with the above links, check out Where to ask a question. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia and enjoy!

P.S.- If you'd like to introduce yourself to the community and perhaps get a question or two answered in the process, drop us a line at the new user log.

 * Not sure if you noticed my comments on your IP address user talk, but I assure you my babbling and confusion is simply a result of sleep derpivation. I hope you will stay a long time and make many contributions.

EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 02:44, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aaron Monse


text:
23 Andromedae

23 Andromedae, abbreviated 23 And, is a presumed single star in the constellation Andromeda, although it has been a suspected spectroscopic binary. 23 Andromedae is the Flamsteed designation. Its apparent visual magnitude is 5.71, which indicates it is dimly visible to the naked eye under good viewing conditions. The distance to 23 And, as determined from its annual parallax shift of $0.331$, is 121.6 light years. The star is moving further from the Earth with a heliocentric radial velocity of −27 km/s. It has a relatively high proper motion, traversing the celestial sphere at the rate of $−27.1$ per year.

The stellar classification of 23 And is F0 IV, matching an F-type subgiant star that is in the process of evolving into a red giant. It displays a slight microvariability with a frequency of 0.85784 d−1 and an amplitude of 0.0062 magnitude. The star is around 759 million years old with a projected rotational velocity of 36 km/s. It has 1.43 times the mass of the Sun and is radiating 50 times the Sun's luminosity from its photosphere at an effective temperature of 7,089 K.

title: 23 Andromedae


text:
13 Andromedae

13 Andromedae, abbreviated 13 And, is a single, blue-white hued variable star in the northern constellation of Andromeda. 13 Andromedae is the Flamsteed designation, while it bears the variable star designation V388 Andromedae. With a typical apparent visual magnitude of around 5.75, it is dimly visible to the naked eye under good seeing conditions. The distance to this star can be directly estimated from its annual parallax shift of $−0.007$, yielding a range of 300 light years. At that distance, its brightness is diminished by an extinction of 0.13 magnitude due to interstellar dust. The star is moving closer to the Earth with a heliocentric radial velocity of −8 km/s.

This is a magnetic chemically peculiar star that has been assigned stellar classifications of B9 III or B9 Mn. It is a variable star of the Alpha2 Canum Venaticorum type, ranging in magnitude from 5.73 down to 5.77 with a period of 1.47946 days. The star has a high rate of spin, showing a projected rotational velocity of 75 km/s. 13 Andromedae is around 345 million years old and shines with 43 times the Sun's luminosity.

title: 13 Andromedae


text:
User:Setochan

Hi...

title: User:Setochan