text:
Talk:Bela Lugosi filmography

Untitled
Usually a filmography should be on the bio page, but since there's so many of them, perhaps it would make more sense to keep a sepate list. The JPS 17:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

 * I see your point, but think it should be merged. Helga76 16:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

 * Given the length of the filmography, a seperate filmography is a good idea. It would look silly otherwise.  Ryan Sudds

I think separate filmographies are fine when the lists are this long. It's clearly noted in the main Lugosi article, so I think the two should remain separate entries. Willerror 16:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Some films are not linked correctly here - for example "The Dark Eyes of London"(1940) is clearly not "The Dead Eyes of London"(1961). Whatevs, yo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.81.93.238 (talk) 07:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Revamp
Just mentioning I'm currently looking at revamping this page into the style of the John Wayne filmography. Ajplmr (talk) 16:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Go for it - all improvements are welcome!  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Question regarding Lulu
I believe Lulu is incorrectly listed. I've looked at two books on Lugosi's films and both seem to point to this film being listed as Lili. The director Michael Curtiz was at this time using the name Mihály Kertész. Of course he'd go onto later fame with Casablanca and other films but his wiki page seem to back up my claim.

Please look at this link. I'll leave it for about a week before I change the entry, I admit I'm not too knowledgeable on his early career. Ajplmr (talk) 23:45, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

It appears that Lugosi did not appear in either Lili nor Lulu, according to more current research.

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request as the common name he is known by in English, as reflected in reliable English language sources.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Béla Lugosi filmography → Bela Lugosi filmography – main article was moved to Bela Lugosi Wladthemlat (talk) 17:26, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. Should be consistent with parent article. Jenks24 (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Film list per Rhodes
Not sure exactly what's going on with the film list here. This filmography is cited to Gary Rhodes's (excellent) 1997 work Lugosi: His Life in Films, on Stage, and in the Hearts of Horror Lovers, but the list of films here doesn't precisely match the list of films there. I've added Slaven Fremdes Willens [Slave of a Foreign Will], which was missing from the article (and was his first German film). Contrariwise, I can't find any listing in Rhodes for Die Sklavenhalter von Kansas-City in 1920, and suspect that entry may be spurious. I'm also concerned that the film titles may not be formatted in the same manner as released. For example, we seem to be calling his second German film Nat Pinkerton im Kampf, but Rhodes lists it as simply Nat Pinkerton. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I've self-reverted here, actually. IMDB -- not a reliable source, I know -- suggests that Sklaven fremdes Willens is a 1920 film. And, in fact, that its the same film we have listed as Hypnose. Rhodes lists Slaven Fremdes Willens as a 1919 work, and doesn't mention Hypnose/Hypnosis at all. I suspect the missing k in Sklaven is a typographical error, but in any case, working out the correct dates and titles for these European silents is out of my current league. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 21:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

theater
The theatrical credits should be moved back to the main article. They don’t belong in a filmography. 24.235.74.199 (talk) 04:56, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Necklace of the dead
In the 1910s section a German movie called "Nachenschnur des tot" is listed, translated as "Necklace of the dead".

I don't have access to the book it's referenced from, so I don't really want to edit directly, but that German title makes no sense.

I assume the first word should be Nackenschnur, which is still not a common word, but would translate as Necklace. If the English translation is assumed correct, it would be "Nackenschnur des/der Toten", for singular/plural. It seems more likely it would be "Nackenschnur des Todes", i.e. "Necklace of Death" Lmartin78 (talk) 04:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

It's a moot point because the latest reference sources say Lugosi's appearance in that film has never been confirmed. He doesn't appear to have starred in that film.

Content
I'm removing excessive details about films. Try to keep it minimal so people can spot a film but it's name and alternative names. Don't need details like it was a "Dual role" or prodution information. I've removed films that are just archival apperances from previously released material. I.e: "Lock Up Your Daughters" which seemingly had nothing new, while Plan 9 had unseen material. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

 * According to Gary Rhodes, a review in a 1959 British magazine said the film contained new footage of Lugosi introducing the film clips. Also a British fan who actually saw the film in a theater told Forrest J. Ackerman that the film contained new footage of Lugosi narrating over some of the clips. So that's two people who saw the film saying it contained new footage. But you are basically assuming they are both mistaken? So you never saw the film but you're superimposing your feelings over the testimony of two people who claim they actually saw the movie circa 1959. That's a bold move, I must say. Wiki-readers deserve to get that information and decide for themselves, without the film's very existence being intentionally withheld from the filmography. HerbLightman (talk) 18:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Daughter of the Night
Please change the name of the Lugosi film article to the original German title Der Tanz auf dem Vulkan? That was the original name of the German film which ran 100 minutes. "Daughter of the Night" is just the title of the shortened and edited U.S. version of the film, which only ran 60 minutes or so. The name of the film on the Lugosi filmography as well as on the film's article should be Der Tanz auf dem Vulkan, since that was the actual full-length 100-minute movie's name. The film was released years later as "Daughter of the Night" in condensed form only; it's missing about 4 reels and thus does not represent the full-length movie. (In fact, I don't think it was ever shown theatrically under the title "Daughter of the Night" --- that may actually have just been the recent VHS home video release title!)
 * Per the article on the film, the film was released in the United States in 1920 as Daughter of the Night. Per Naming conventions (films) "Use the title more commonly recognized by English readers; normally this means the title under which it has been released in cinemas or on video in the English-speaking world." So if you read the article, you'd see this isn't a VHS title, do no speculate stuff when the source is right there. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

 * American viewers might be more familiar with the "Daughter of the Night" title, but that isn't the whole movie! The film with that title is only an edited down version of the real German film. The only way you could see the entire film is to watch the German-titled version, not "Daughter of the Night". HerbLightman (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Per film standards, we usually go with the the English title, as that is what users on English-language wikipedia would better understand. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ok but we're talking about two very different movies here. The German movie ran 40 minutes longer. They're two different films really. HerbLightman (talk) 18:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I would suggest reading Naming conventions (films) and getting back to me about it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Asszonyszivek kalandora
Asszonyszivek kalandora is a tricky film to place in Lugosi's filmography. What we know is (per the Kaffenberger and Rhodes books) It was also seemingly made in the 1910s, but well, see above. I'll add it to 1922 with some notices. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Lugosi was definitely the star.
 * Two act short film.
 * No film titled Asszonyszívek kalandora has ever been catalogued by silent film specialists in Hungary, nor has it surfaced in exhaustive searches of Hungarian industry trade publications or period newspapers.
 * It's possible Lugosi or someone else has re-titled the film as Asszonyszívek kalandora
 * It was shown on October 8, 1922.

 * The film was obviously condensed from an earlier Hungarian film (I would say it was LEONI LEO based on the plotline), and Lugosi didn't make any films in Hungary after 1918. So it has to be listed with the other Hungarian movies, I'd say, since it has to be from the pre-1918 period. Rhodes surmised the film was edited in a way to showcase Lugosi's scenes and cutting out the parts Lugosi wasn't in, but I doubt that Lugosi personally edited it or retitled it. I think the Hungarian studio just created it (and retitled it) as an edited version of LEONI LEO, and it was probably shown theatrically in Hungary in that form (maybe as a second attraction). One of Lugosi's contacts in the U.S. probably came across the edited version in a film rental catalog and they probably decided to rent it and screen it for his friends. Lugosi must've just seen it listed in a rental catalog and decided to rent and view it. That's how it looks to me. But it was definitely produced in Hungary before 1918. (Lugosi wasn't in Hungary after 1918). HerbLightman (talk) 20:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The film wasnt shown theatrically under that title, was it? I think it was just shown at a couple of private screenings that Lugosi set up, wasn't it?  So if that's the case, the 1922 date is not a theatrical released date. That's just the date Lugosi and his friends screened it.  On the other hand, we know if it was a Hungarian film, it had to be made BEFORE 1918 at the latest. The studio probably re-edited it to showcase Lugosi's scenes after he left their employ, since he was starting to become well known when he emigrated to Germany. HerbLightman (talk) 20:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, we release in films in order of their public screening and you have to provide proof that things are what you claim "i.e: they are taken from this or that film". So you'll need proof as we don't not publish original research. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I honestly do not believe that the 1922 date of that private screening can possibly be considered as the film's first "public screening". That was hardly a public screening from what I understand. Are you saying that the Hungarian film company created an edited-down version of the film and didn't show it anywhere until 1922 in the U.S. ?? Was the film even in English? We should list it under 1918 and just write "N/A" for the release date. HerbLightman (talk) 17:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No we shouldn't, because a filmography is sorted by it's earliest known public release. Have you even read the source? Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Wrong year?
The Death Kiss says 1933, but this article says it was 1932. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:7C07:235:AA08:D3AE (talk) 23:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

 * Good point. The article needs some clarification too, I'm no expert, but films didn't quite receive national releases like mentioned in the Death Kiss article. The citation does state it was going to be released in '32, but was changed. Some more research ins this area when I'm not prepping for bed should be investigated. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Bela Lugosi filmography


text:
Henry W. Keyes

Henry Wilder Keyes (May 23, 1863 – June 19, 1938) was an American Republican politician from Haverhill, New Hampshire. He served as the 56th governor of New Hampshire from 1917 to 1919 and as a United States Senator.

Early life
Keyes was born in Newbury, Vermont, on May 23, 1863. He was raised in New Hampshire, and his father was a prominent farmer, merchant, and railroad investor. Keyes graduated from Adams Academy, and then attended Harvard University, from which he graduated in 1887. He was a farmer and cattle breeder, and initiated raising of the Holstein-Friesian breed in the United States. He was also a founder of the Woodsville National Bank, and served as its president.

Politics
Keyes served in the New Hampshire House of Representatives from 1891 to 1895. He served in the New Hampshire State Senate from 1903 to 1905. He was treasurer of the State license commission from 1903 to 1915, and chairman of the State excise commission from 1915 to 1917. from 1915 to 1917 he served again in the state House of Representatives.

In 1916 he was elected Governor of New Hampshire, and he served one term, 1917 to 1919.

Keyes ran successfully for the United States Senate in 1918. He was reelected in 1924 and 1930 and served from March 4, 1919, to January 3, 1937. He did not seek another term in the 1936 election. As a senator, he was noted for not speaking on the floor, even nodding or shaking his head to vote "aye" or "nay." The one exception was his motion to adjourn during a long winded speech by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Pat Harrison.

During his Senate career, Keyes served as chairman of: the Committee on Expenditures in the Post Office Department (Sixty-sixth Congress); Committee to Audit and Control the Contingent Expenses (Sixty-eighth and Sixty-ninth Congresses); and Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds (Seventieth through Seventy-second Congresses).

Personal
In 1904, Keyes married Frances Parkinson Wheeler, who as Frances Parkinson Keyes became a prolific author. He was forty, she was eighteen. They had three sons together—Henry Wilder Keyes, Jr., John Parkinson Keyes, and Francis Keyes.

Keyes died on June 19, 1938, in North Haverhill, New Hampshire, and is buried at the Oxbow Cemetery in Newbury, Vermont.

He was the recipient of an honorary degree of Master of Arts from Dartmouth College and was also as honorary Bachelor of Science and LL.D. of the New Hampshire College of Agriculture and the Mechanic Arts (now the University of New Hampshire).

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Henry W. Keyes


text:
Michael McMahon

Michael E. McMahon (born September 12, 1957) is an American politician and attorney serving as the District Attorney for Richmond County, which is coextensive with Staten Island. A member of the Democratic Party, McMahon is a former U.S. Representative for NY's 13th congressional district, serving from 2009 until 2011, and a former member of the New York City Council.

Early life, education and career
McMahon is a lifelong resident of Staten Island. He is of German and Irish descent. He grew up in the Stapleton neighborhood on the North Shore and attended parochial schools. He graduated from New York University in 1979, later obtaining a J.D. degree from New York Law School. He then worked for Democratic State Assembly members Eric Vitaliano and Elizabeth Connelly. He joined the staff of City Councilman Jerome X. O'Donovan, whom he succeeded in the Council. Prior to being elected to public office, McMahon worked as a partner at O'Leary, McMahon & Spero law firm in Staten Island. Since 1981 he is member of the student Corps Saxo-Borussia Heidelberg.

New York City Council
McMahon served as the Chair of the New York City Council's Sanitation & Solid Waste Management Committee focusing on minimizing the use of trucks to transport garbage and also more evenly distributing the load of waste processing across the five boroughs.

Committee assignments

 * Committee on Foreign Affairs
 * Subcommittee on Europe
 * Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade
 * Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia
 * Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
 * Subcommittee on Aviation
 * Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation
 * Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials

Political positions
In November 2009, McMahon voted along with 38 other Democrats against the Affordable Health Care for America Act and against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in March 2010. He was the only member of the New York City delegation to do so, and was only one of two New York Democrats, the other being Michael Arcuri, to vote against it.

2008
On May 28, 2008, the Staten Island Democratic Committee endorsed McMahon to run for the Congressional seat in New York's 13th congressional district being vacated by retiring 12-year incumbent Republican Vito Fossella. On September 9, 2008 McMahon defeated opponent Steve Harrison in the Democratic Party primary with 75% of votes to Harrison's 25%. Earlier, on June 11, 2008, McMahon had been endorsed by the city's 12 Democratic congressmen.

The 13th had long been considered to be the most conservative district of the 13 that divided New York City. It was based in Staten Island, which is the base of the city's Republican Party. Although Democrats have a 17-point edge in registration, its voters are somewhat conservative on social issues and matters regarding "law and order", which kept Republicans in the seat for over a quarter century. However, the Republicans had considerable difficulty finding a replacement for Fossella on the ballot, eventually settling on former state assemblyman Robert Straniere. As a result, nearly all major pundits believed McMahon was almost certain to win the seat. In the November election, McMahon won in a landslide, taking 61 percent of the vote to Straniere's 33 percent. With his victory, New York City's congressional delegation became entirely Democratic for the first time in 76 years. This occurred despite the fact that John McCain narrowly carried Staten Island in the presidential election; a Democratic presidential candidate has carried Staten Island only four times since 1936.

2010
McMahon was challenged by Republican and Conservative Party nominee Michael Grimm, a former FBI Special Agent, and Libertarian nominee Tom Vendittelli. Grimm won the election, defeating McMahon. He was one of a number of freshman Democrats who lost reelection in the GOP landslide of 2010. In all, Democrats lost 63 seats in the 2010 Republican landslide.

2015
McMahon had publicly expressed a "serious interest" for retaking his old seat, now numbered as the 11th District, in the 2015 special election to replace his successor Michael Grimm. Grimm, who defeated McMahon for reelection in 2010, announced his plans to resign in January after pleading guilty to a felony tax evasion charge on December 23, 2014. McMahon, however, declined to run, deciding to enter the race for Staten Island (Richmond County) District Attorney, and the Democratic nomination went to New York City Councilman Vincent J. Gentile, who was from the Brooklyn portion of the district.

In November, McMahon defeated Republican candidate Joan Illuzzi for Staten Island District Attorney. In April 2024, following the resignation of former Erie County District Attorney John Flynn, McMahon was sworn in as President of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York.

title: Michael McMahon


text:
User talk:Ehrhardtl

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Ehrhardtl


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killzone PSP

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 22:40, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Killzone PSP
Appears to be non sense.  Molotov     (talk)    17:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Among other things, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. GreetingsEarthling 17:55, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per GreetingsEarthling. Thunderbrand 18:10, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable that the game is being developed. Also, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --J. Nguyen 18:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed. It isn't even really known if this game is in development. --Homestar14 8:59, 17 October 2005 (EST)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:SecretSauce

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Image copyright problem with Image:Wallenstein_Board1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wallenstein_Board1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 07:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:GAMES mag logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GAMES mag logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:IGA logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IGA logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wallenstein Box.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wallenstein Box.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wallenstein Board4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wallenstein Board4.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wallenstein Board6.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wallenstein Board6.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wallenstein Box2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wallenstein Box2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Inside Dice Tower (bgg.com).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Inside Dice Tower (bgg.com).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:23, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wallenstein Box.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Wallenstein Box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:SecretSauce


text:
Talk:EMD SD45X

SD45X roster here http://users.inna.net/~jaydeet/sd45x.htm --207.69.137.21 17:41, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:EMD SD45X


text:
User talk:Wratz

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:41, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Wratz


text:
User talk:DaniloVilicic

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:41, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Hi!
Hi, Danilo. Do you remember our talk about "Chono" place names?. I made es:Idioma chono with scarce avalaible information on Internet and another few sources. Can you review it? Thanks. Lin linao 08:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

mapuche placenmes
Hi, would you like to check and improve this list? List of Mapudungun placenames. This is the source for some of the etymologies:. Dentren |  Ta lk  18:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Chon languages
Hi, Danilo. No, I'm not writing about anything on en:wp because my English is very poor. I only make minor edits here :(. My contributions to es:wp are more big (?) and I've added some information about Kawésqar, Mapudungun, Chono and Chon languages (using Fernández Garay, "El tehuelche"). I think that we can work together, translating en<->es; look at Mapudungun and es:Idioma mapuche (yesterday another bibliotecarios moved it from mapudungun and my arguments didn't work); both of them contain a lot of lacking data that can be found on their "brother" in the other language. Bye. Lin linao 00:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Diaguitas and Kakán
Do you mean that they didnt existed? Do you have sources? Sounds interesting, if that is true why ddint earrly spaniards notice that? Diego de Almagro and other conquistadores that traveled in Norte Chico and nortern Argentina should have noticed that they didnt spoke same language.. Even if "Diaguitas" as we know them from the school books may not exist, the inhabitants of Norte Chico needs a name (even if its origin is incorrect). Dentren |  Ta lk  17:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Chile Invitation!
Hi Danilo- where did you go- haven't heard from you on Waata Chis in ages. Say hello if you have a chance. One of the subscribers is currently working with Cristina Calderon. Maybe some new things to talk about. Hope all is well with you. Yahganlang —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.76.23.72 (talk) 20:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Mapudungun Wikipedia
Hello DaniloVilicic. I'd like to inform you about the proposal for a Mapudungun Wikipedia. The request is at Meta, and the test project is located at Wp/arn (main page). Greetings, SPQRobin (talk) 12:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Necesito que me ayudes, con algo muy pequeño, en el artículo Extremaduran language. Si ves, puse un cuadro comparativo, del extremeño, con otras lenguas romances, bajo ese cuadro hay una pequeña nota. Quiero especificar que las palabras del extremeño, que están en ese cuadro, no son aplicables a toda la lengua. --El estremeñu (talk) 23:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

title: User talk:DaniloVilicic


text:
A Real Fine Place to Start

"A Real Fine Place to Start" is a song written by Radney Foster and George Ducas and recorded by American country music artist Sara Evans. It was released in May 2005 as the first single from Evans' 2005 album Real Fine Place. The song became Evans' fourth number one hit on the US Billboard Hot Country Songs chart in September 2005, holding that position for two weeks. This would also be her last number one single until "A Little Bit Stronger" reached number one in May 2011. On June 15, 2006, the song was certified Gold by the RIAA.

Content
"A Real Fine Place to Start" is an up-tempo contemporary country song, with prominent electric guitar and steel guitar fills. The song's narrator tells about being in love and getting to know a person from the beginning, describing this as "a real fine place to start."

The song was originally recorded by co-writer Radney Foster on his 2002 album, Another Way to Go.

Music video
The music video is mainly set in a desert with Evans singing the song in various places around the desert. In the beginning of the video a motorcycle is shown driving along a road in the middle in the desert with a couple in it. The couple then stops on the roadside and the video then shows the two holding hands and sitting on rocks in the desert. The couple exemplifies what the song is talking about. The video regularly shifts between Evans and the couple in the music video. While the video isn't showing the couple, it is showing Evans singing in various places in the desert, including desert rocks and by a bonfire. Towards the middle of the song, the video shows Evans performing with a band at night. The video also shows Evans playing her rhythmic guitar for a brief period of time. It was directed by Peter Zavadil, and filmed at Grand Canyon National Park in Flagstaff, AZ.

The music video reached number 1 on CMT's Top Twenty Countdown for the week of October 6, 2005.

Chart performance
"A Real Fine Place to Start" spent approximately four months on the charts, becoming her fourth Number One hit of her career, on the U.S. Billboard Hot Country Songs chart in September 2005. It stayed at number one on the country charts for two weeks and was one of the biggest hits of the summer and of the year. The song also peaked at number 38 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100, becoming Evans' fifth Top 40 hit on the Hot 100, and Evans' first single to chart on the U.S. Billboard Pop 100.

title: A Real Fine Place to Start


text:
Maxim Gorky (disambiguation)

Maxim Gorky was a Russian writer.

Maxim Gorky, Maxim Gorkiy or Maksim Gorkiy may also refer to:
 * Soviet cruiser Maxim Gorky, a Kirov-class cruiser
 * SS Maxim Gorkiy, a cruise ship formerly operated by Phoenix Reisen
 * Tupolev ANT-20 or Maxim Gorky, a propaganda aircraft
 * Maksim Gorkiy, Armenia or Bovadzor, a town in the Lori Province of Armenia
 * Maxim Gorky Fortresses, coastal batteries used by the Soviet Union in the Crimea during World War II
 * Maksim Gorkiy station, a station on the Chilonzor Line of the Tashkent Metro.

title: Maxim Gorky (disambiguation)


text:
Talk:Internet Low Bitrate Codec

Possible copyvio, most of the text appears to be copied from ilbc's website.

 * Rewritten, waiting for approval at ILBC/Temp --Shaddack 00:04, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Temp page moved to main article. RedWolf 17:58, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

What exactly requires a license? A program code (Reference Implementation) or any implementation according to the standard. I think, it should be specified. Roman Imankulov 10:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Internet Low Bitrate Codec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/documentation/gips_iLBClicense.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internet Low Bitrate Codec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081030043137/http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/documentation/gips_iLBClicense.pdf to http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/documentation/gips_iLBClicense.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Internet Low Bitrate Codec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110705082246/http://www.webrtc.org/ilbc-freeware to http://www.webrtc.org/ilbc-freeware
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110705082246/http://www.webrtc.org/ilbc-freeware to http://www.webrtc.org/ilbc-freeware

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Internet Low Bitrate Codec


text:
User talk:Kakistocrat

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

CfD nomination of Category:Indian American football players
Category:Indian American football players, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 04:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

File:Ddbig.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ddbig.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Truman Scholars has been nominated for listification
Category:Truman Scholars has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 14:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kakistocrat


text:
User talk:Broken Arrow

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Image copyright problem RE: Image:Avril Lavigne (36).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Avril Lavigne (36).jpg. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:
 * The copyright holder, and
 * The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this:.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:
 * An open content licence
 * Public Domain
 * Fair Use

 * The copyright holder gets the best protection of his work by licencing their work under an open content license like the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. If you have the express permission of the copyright holder to licence their work under the above licence, use the image copyright tag: cc-by-sa-2.5.  The GNU Free Documentation License is another choice for licencing one's work.  Again, if you have the express permission of the copyright holder, use the tag: GFDL.

 * The copyright holder can also release his work into the public domain, see here for images released into the public domain.

 * Images from certain sources are automatically release into the Public Domain. This is true for most governments like the federal United States government. (See   here  for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments)  However not all governments release their work into the public domain, such as the UK government (See herefor images from the UK government).  Non-free licence governments are listed here.

 * Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of Fair Use. To see if this image qualifies and then how to tag it, see Fair use.

For any other sources of for more information see Image copyright tags. Please remember that if you don't tag your images, they will be deleted.

 * P.S. If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them.  Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. Extraordinary Machine 23:14, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Image source/licensing for Image:Avril Lavigne (36).jpg
This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:30, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Edits to Avril Lavigne
Please do not remove unreferenced tags from articles that contain no references. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 11:57, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Avril Lavigne (86).JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Avril Lavigne (86).JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use .)  See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Kurt Shaped Box 23:23, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cosmo-Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cosmo-Cover.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Guinness 14:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Avril Lavigne
Per Guide to layout, prose is preferable to lists when writing articles, especially when the relevant text is made up of actual paragraphs rather than single sentences. Also, we generally refer to people in articles by their surnames, and we should never use Wikipedia articles as references for other Wikipedia articles. Extraordinary Machine 03:24, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:AvRiL lAvigNe (141).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AvRiL lAvigNe (141).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box 00:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Avril-Olympics.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Avril-Olympics.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 15:29, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Broken Arrow


text:
Portland Wind Farm

The Portland wind farm is one of Australia's largest wind farms. It is owned and operated by Pacific Blue and is located on the coast of south-western Victoria near the city of Portland, it consists of four separate sites, all of which have been completed as of 2015. Completion of the entire 195 MW project was expected in 2011, at a capital cost of A$330 million.

The project is expected to produce more than 500GWh annually, enough electricity to power about 125,000 homes each year, and equal to more than 7% of Victoria's residential electricity demand, or powering a city the size of Geelong. The project is being developed by Pacific Blue.

History
The Danish turbine manufacturer, Vestas, constructed a blade manufacturing facility at nearby Portland in August 2005. Blades from the plant were intended to support the project. Blades were ultimately sourced from overseas however, and the plant was closed down in December 2007. Vestas cited too little investment support from the Federal government as the reason for the closure.

The planning minister approved the construction of wind towers on the Portland capes, including Cape Bridgewater, against the recommendations of the a Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal hearing and of a government appointed panel.

Stages

 * 1) Yambuk wind farm, the first stage of the project, consists of 20 turbines, each measuring 105 m tall, with a maximum rated output of 1.5 MW, totalling to a maximum capacity of 30 MW. These were commissioned in January 2007. The wind farm is adjacent to the existing Codrington Wind Farm, and is expected to produce more than 90GWh annually at a capital cost of about 50 million Australian dollars.
 * 2) Cape Bridgewater wind farm of 58 MW, comprises 29, 2 MW generators. At completion in 2008 it was the largest wind farm in Victoria.
 * 3) Cape Nelson South wind farm of 44 MW, comprises 22, 2 MW generators. It was completed in 2009.
 * 4) Cape Sir William Grant wind farm (PWEP IV) of 47 MW, comprises 23, 2.05 MW generators. It was completed in 2015.

title: Portland Wind Farm


text:
User talk:Tucalipe~enwiki

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tucalipe. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tucalipe~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tucalipe~enwiki


text:
User talk:Owlsfan

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Wandisco
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Wandisco, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Muchness 07:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

WANdisco, again
Hello; you said on my talk page:
 * Rewrote WANdisco WANdisco and the link from distributed computing. Let me know what you think and if it passes the intgr test.

The problem is, you didn't rewrite it, you just added a single statement and copied the remaining advert from Replication (computer science), which is also marked with advert already. And you were so blatant at it that you forgot to remove the citation mark "[1]", and misplaced a link.

I also have a feeling that you never actually paid attention to my message on the talk page, and nor the neutral point of view policy of Wikipedia (which is so helpfully pointed out by the advert box). The article also falls short of notability and verifiability.

Your behavior and attitude ("and if it passes the intgr test") seems to imply that you are not here to write an encyclopedia, but just to get the article over with, presumably for advertisement. This is a conflict of interest, so perhaps you're better off not editing it in the first place. And note that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertisement.

I will list the article for propsed deletion. If you remove the tag without actually improving the article in an encyclopedic sense, I am going to pursue articles for deletion. If I was correct about your conflict of interest, I would advise sparing the effort. -- intgr 10:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Owlsfan


text:
Brampton Canadettes Easter Tournament

Brampton Canadettes Easter Tournament is an annual 3$1/2$ day tournament for women's and girls' hockey teams. It has been held every year since 1967 and is hosted by the Brampton Canadettes in Brampton, Ontario. It bills itself as "The World's Largest Female Hockey Tournament". Teams of all ages and categories compete. Teams from across Canada and the United States and from as far as England, Switzerland, Japan, Kazakhstan and Russia attend this international tournament.

Including championship finals, over 600 games are played. Each team competes in a minimum of three games each over the course of the tournament. There is no limit on the number of teams in a division. Thousands of players and spectators attend the tournament each year.

The Intermediate AA and Midget AA divisions are highly scouted by local and American colleges and universities seeking recruits for varsity teams.

title: Brampton Canadettes Easter Tournament


text:
Nicolai Eigtved

Nicolai Eigtved (4 June 1701 – 7 June 1754), also known as Niels Eigtved, was a Danish architect. He introduced and was the leading proponent of the French rococo or late baroque style in Danish architecture during the 1730s–1740s. He designed and built some of the most prominent buildings of his time, a number of which still stand to this day. He also played an important role in the establishment of the Royal Danish Academy of Art (Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademi), and was its first native-born leader.

Youth and early training
He was born Niels Madsen on the farm in the village of Egtved in the parish of Haraldsted on the island of Zealand, Denmark to Mads Nielsen and Dorthe Hansdatter. He was trained locally as a gardener, and was promoted to a position at the Frederiksberg Palace Gardens ca. 1720. In July 1723 he got an opportunity to travel out of the country as a royal gardening apprentice. He travelled to Berlin and Dresden, among other places in Germany, earned his keep with jobs as a gardener, and learned to speak German.

Years in Poland
From 1725 he lived in Warsaw, Poland, where he came to the attention of German architect and draughtsman Colonel Matthäus Daniel Pöppelmann, for whom he worked for several years. Pöppelmann was connected to the Saxon-Polish court under Frederick Augustus I, and got him a position as second lieutenant in the Saxon-Polish Engineer Corps.

Eigtved came into a rich architectural environment, which was influenced by the presence of French immigrants including Jean de Bodt and Zacharias Longuelune. Some of Pöppelmann's assignments in those years, on which Eigtved would have probably participated, were Augustus Bridge (Augustusbruecke) in Dresden (1728), the extension of the Japanese Palace (Japanisches Palais) in Dresden (1727), drafts for the three-king church in Dresden new city (1723–1739), and a new large lock for the Saxon dynasty (c. 1730).

In 1730 Eigtved was promoted to lieutenant in Engineer Corps, and participated in the building of the ruler's military camp near Zeithain. He made excellent military drawings, and became acquainted with Danish statesman General Poul Vendelbo Løvenørn, who after his return to Denmark interested King Christian VI in Eigtved. The King summoned Eigtved to Denmark, and with the title of captain he was dismissed from foreign service.

In service to Denmark
He was made Danish lieutenant in 1732, and Christian VI let Eigtved further educate himself in Italy between 1732 and 1735 in civil architecture. On his travel back to Denmark, he stayed and made drawings in Vienna and Munich, where he became familiar with the rococo style seen in the design of French architect François de Cuvilliés for the newly built Amalienburg Palace near Nymphenburg Eigtved returned to Denmark in 1735 after twelve years' absence. Building construction was at a fever pitch, with construction of Christiansborg Palace having been begun three years earlier. He was named captain in the Engineer Corps, and named royal building master with supervisory responsibility for Jutland and Funen in 1735.

Royal building master
Thus began a lifelong rivalry with colleague Lauritz de Thurah, another royal building master and the leading proponent of baroque architecture at the time. Eigtved became the king's preferred architect, and Eigtved's rococo style was the preferred building style. As a result, de Thurah was often overlooked, while Eigtved got the best assignments.

He participated along with German architect Elias David Hausser and Lauritz de Thurah in the interior construction of Christiansborg Palace, with wood sculpting by Louis August le Clerc. Eigtved and de Thurah, for the most part, divided up the interior assignments. Eigtved designed the king's apartments, the main staircase, the chapel's interior, the riding grounds, and the Marble Bridge (Marmorbroen) and its two pavilions, and gave the castle its delicate Louis XIV style. Most of Eigtved's accomplishments at Christiansborg were lost in the fire of 1794.

Hausser, who had been the original architect for the project, lost his influence as the younger de Thurah and Eigtved took on larger assignments in the castle project. In 1738 the king set up a royal buildings commission that would lead the continued work on the castle. The commission would be led by State Minister Count Johan Sigismund Schulin (1694–1750). At the same time Eigtved and de Thurah switched areas of responsibilities, where de Thurah gave up Copenhagen and the island of Zealand, in exchange for Eigtved's Jutland Peninsula. In 1742 Eigtved was promoted to lieutenant colonel in the Engineer Corps, became a member of the Building Commission, and took over the role of leading architect for Christiansborg Palace from Hausser. Eigtved designed and built, along with Boye Junge, The Prince's mansion at Frederiksholm's Canal (Frederiksholms Kanal) 1743–1744, for the Crown Prince Frederik V. The building is now the National Museum (Nationalmuseet). At the same time, he also designed a mansion for Schulin of the Building Commission in Frederiksdal.

Between 1744 and 1745, Eigtved built a small pavilion for Privy Councillor J.S. Schulin on the Furesø Lake called Frederiksdal Pavilion. Credited with being the earlier example of "maison de plaisance" in Denmark, "it jointly had large and small rooms symmetrically ordered around the main axis' vestibule and constervatory. The mansard roof is the result of an alteration carried out by Johann Gottfried Rosenberg in 1752–1753, who while working on Frederiksdal also designed Margård Manor on Funen, also inspired by French country estates."

Foundation for the Royal Danish Academy of Art
Around this same time he came in contact with the Drawing and Painting Academy (Tegne – og Malerakademiet), predecessor to the Royal Danish Academy of Art (Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademi). Until then the Academy has had an impoverished existence with weak leadership. Eigtved overtook administrative responsibility for the Academy in 1745 after the departure of Hieronimo Miani as leader from Denmark.

The Marble Bridge at Christiansborg was completed in 1744. He was named Church Inspector for Copenhagen, Kronborg, Antborskov, Vordingborg and Tryggevælde district in 1745.

In 1746 Frederik V ascended to the throne, and along with him came the powerful statesman and leader Court Marshal (Hofmarshal) Adam Gottlob Moltke, who became Eigtved's proponent in the court.

On 28 December 1747 he made a proposal to create a stronger foundation for the Academy, which was approved by the King on 12 February 1748. In this way Eigtved took control of the Academy as its first strong administrator, and the first Dane in a leading position. In late summer 1748 the Academy moved to the floor above the Crown Prince's stables at Christiansborg Palace, where Eigtved also had his official offices.

Copenhagen district: Frederiksstad
In 1748 it was 300 years since the Oldenburg family took the throne in Denmark, and in 1749 the 300-year jubilee of the coronation of Christian I of Denmark was commemorated with the establishment of a new district in Copenhagen called Frederiksstad. Heading the project was Moltke, and Eigtved was architect. The new Frederiksstaden district was built on the former grounds of Amalien Garden (Amalienhave), and became a fine example of European rococo architecture.

At the center of the district lay the four palaces at Amalienborg, including the Moltke Palace, today known as Christian VII's Palace, surrounding the octagonal Amalienborg Plaza. In the middle of the plaza, Moltke's Danish Asia Company erected a monumental equestrian statue of Frederick VI designed by Jacques François Joseph Saly. The four palaces surrounding the plaza were identical from the outside, but different on the inside. Moltke's Palace was the most expensive, and had the most extravagant interiors. Its Great Hall (Riddersalen) is acknowledged widely as perhaps the finest Danish rococo interior.

Eigtved also designed and built in the Frederikstaden district Frederiks Hospital, now the Danish Museum of Applied Arts ( Kunstindustrimuseet). Eigtved also led building work on one of the masterpieces of Frederiksstad — the centrally located Frederik's Church (Frederikskirke), now commonly referred to as now known as The Marble Church (Marmorkirken).

Moltke, who was also director for the Danish Asiatic Company, had Eigtved design a warehouse for the company on Christianshavn. The building called Eigtved's Pakhus was built 1748–1750. During this same period of time Eigtved also worked on the expansion of Moltke's estate Bregentved, which had been given to him by the King after his ascension to the throne. He was promoted to colonel in the Engineer Corps in 1749.

Change of direction and Eigtved's fall
Eigtved became the Art Academy's first director in 1751. However Eigtved's rococo style, which had been popular for so long, was about to suffer with the absolutist King's change of interest. On 30 March 1754, on the King's thirtieth birthday, the Academy moved to Charlottenborg, and became dedicated as the Royal Danish Academy of Art, after inspiration from France's Académie française. Eigtved was snubbed at the Academy of Art's opening ceremony when professor and royal portraitist Carl Gustaf Pilo gave the welcoming speech to King Frederick V, not Eigtved. Eigtved was removed from the Director's position a few days later, and the directorship went to Frenchman sculptor Jacques Saly. Also on the same day that the Academy was moved to Charlottenborg, the Eigtved-designed Moltke Palace was officially dedicated by the king.

At his death two of the four Amalienborg Palaces were complete, the two western palaces. The work that he had begun was continued by de Thurah strictly according to Eigtved's plans. The palaces were finally completed in 1760. de Thurah tried unsuccessfully to get project leadership of the work on Frederick's Church, but was denied that role, which went instead to Nicolas-Henri Jardin on 1 April 1756.

He stands along with Laurids de Thurah as the leading architect of his time. His death probably saved him from the same type of long, agonizing downfall, as de Thurah had suffered, when his rococo style gave way to the King's newly preferred neoclassicism and his newly preferred architect, Nicolas-Henri Jarden. Eigtved also built Sophienberg in Rungsted, the old Royal Danish Teatre, and in 1753 helped extend Fredensborg Palace by adding four symmetrically positioned corner pavilions with separate copper pyramid-shaped roofs to the main building.

Personal life
On 24 May 1743, he married Sophie Christine Walther (1726–1795), chambermaid to Princess Louise, at Frederickborg Castle Chapel. They had seven children, but only three lived to adulthood. His daughter Anne Margrethe Eigtved was married to architect Georg David Anthon (1714–1781).

Eigtved died on 7 June 1754 in Copenhagen. He and members of his family were buried at St. Peter's Church, Copenhagen.

Other sources

 * Knud Voss; Nicolai Eigtved (1971) Arkitekten Nicolai Eigtved, 1701-1754 (Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag) ISBN 978-8717014657

title: Nicolai Eigtved


text:
Talk:West Dulwich railway station

Another image (for use if page expands):
 * its broken mate Pickle 10:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:West Dulwich railway station


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Real Fine Place to Start

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge — the vote did not reach a clear consensus — 2 votes delete, 2 votes keep and 2 votes merge — there is recognition that the article as it stands is sub-standard and there is little scope for much expansion — all useful content is to be merged with Sara Evans and the page is to be kept as a useful redirect to that article. --Gareth Hughes 14:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

A Real Fine Place to Start
Unsalvageable POV based article Cdyson37 | (Talk) 17:45, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Merge to Sara Evans  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   18:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but certainly clean up, and possibly shift focus to the album, not the song. It's a notable song, that was at the top of the country charts for 2 weeks. The album is also notable, having been #3 on the Billboard charts for all genres. Just FYI, POV level isn't a criteria for deletion-LtNOWIS 18:51, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the interesting information about this is already mention in Sara Evans. The overwhelming majority of this article is not even about this song (yes, it's a single song!), preferring instead to wax POVical about the singer. With the fluff removed, there's nothing left that isn't said more cleanly in the singer's article already: and that only takes one line. -Splash talk 20:42, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite reads like a fan site. Cool3 20:24, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge it into Sara Evans and forget about it--Ewok Slayer 01:43, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text: User talk:69.157.102.41

title: User talk:69.157.102.41


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Vasiliev

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Gareth Hughes 17:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Michael Vasiliev
Delete - No sources provided. If claims made for him were true, Comrade Vasiliev would almost certainly have been made a Marshal of the Soviet Union, and he wasn't. Caerwine 17:45, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep seems notable, verifiable and is well written. See Google hits also. Take care,  [[Image:Smilie.gif|20px]] Molotov  [[Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif|25px]]   (talk)

 * I apparently was looking at the wrong article - it is not well written, so I say it needs a "cleanup" at the least.  [[Image:Smilie.gif|20px]] Molotov  (talk)  [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]]   00:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup Mikhailov Vasiliev is notable at Stalingrad. The article needs cleanup - written by non-native English speaker.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   18:37, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Could you give us the basis for your claim? Are you from Stalingrad (sic) or something? -Splash talk 20:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * No, I think I've got this muddled. What I was referring to seem to be codenames used between Stalin (Vasiliev) and Vasilievsky (Mikhailov).   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   21:08, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have been unable to find verifiable information about "Michael Vasiliev" having any significant role in the Russian army see . "Mikhailov Vasilievsky" comes up with Russian ice hockey players see . Aleksandr Vasilevsky, supervisor of the Stalingrad front had a middle name of Mikhailov and we already have an article on him. This name is so far removed from the real name that it is useless as a redirect. Capitalistroadster 18:56, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Merely finding some Google hits isn't meaningful unless you check that the Google hits actually apply to the topic of the article, which they largely do not in this case: the first hit is this article. On the other hand, the absence of Google success that Capitalistroadster finds renders the article with serious verifiability problems. The article is also largely written in the absurd which makes taking its topic seriously the more difficult. -Splash talk 20:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google for "mikhail vasiliev army" or 'михвйл василиев" turns up no relevant results.  the iBook of the Revolution 22:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Wacky claims, no references, lack of verification and bigass POV problems... Yeah, delete. -- Captain Disdain 00:49, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Mauritania–Senegal Border War

Merge suggestion
Someone has suggested 1989 events in Mauritania and Senegal be merged into this article. I would suggest that while these topics contain much overlap, the internal ethnic conflict and refugee crisis of the 1989 events in Mauritania and Senegal might be renamed to show the existing focus of that article is on Mauritania, and the events which caused a massive refugee outpouring into Senegal. This article, the Mauritania–Senegal_Border_War is one consequence of that crisis, but only one, and should remain a separate article. Should the other article be renamed 1989 events in Mauritania or 1989 ethnic conflict in Mauritania or 1989 Mauritanian refugee crisis? Suggestions and difference of opinion can only help here! T L Miles (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

 * In the interim, someone has both combined these articles (without discussion or even edit summaries) and then removed large sections of them, specifically removing anything referencing skin-color based conflict. I'm tempted to just revert several years of edits, as this thing now is almost worse than having no article at all (and for the riots, mass killings, ethnic violence etc in Mauritania that sparked this war, there IS no article). See changes here.  All in all, this is an unreferenced POV nationalist mess.  T L Miles (talk) 16:29, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

 * Agreed. The current article, even with the incorporation of the French article, still fails to mention a lot of the later violence. I'll try and expand these sections. MrPenguin20 (talk) 03:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Possible way out of this mess of an article
Take a look at fr:Conflit_sénégalo-mauritanien, the French language equivalent of this. It is short and does not fully cover the territory, but it is a neutral, well referenced, start. A complete wipe-out of the current English article and its replacement by a translation of the French article would be a good start. Below is the quite useful bibliography of the French language article (which contains English language sources).

Wiki Education assignment: Aid, Arms, and Armies - The Politics of Intervention in Africa
— Assignment last updated by ProfWellman (talk) 20:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mauritania–Senegal Border War


text:
User talk:Uniuniunium

Welcome!

Hello, Uniuniunium, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Molotov     (talk)    17:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your userpage was briefly delisted by a rogue admin
You have a userbox Template:User UN which links your userpage to United Nations Wikipedians. There is currently a movement to ban userboxes from Wikipedia which are shared and which create Lists of Wikipedians. Certain admins have taken it upon themselves to preemptively sabotage and/or delete such categories and template. Here is the incident report which reported damage to yours, in which hundreds of userpages were delinked from categories without the users' knowledge. They have been stopped, barely, and the damage reverted— for now.

There is a Userbox policy poll, which if passed, will make required by policy the damage done to categories and templates such as User UN/United Nations Wikipedians. If you do not want this to happen, I urge you to vote Oppose. in the poll. Support is currently running at about 66%, and your vote could make the difference. It is said to require 75%-80% to be deemed reflective of consensus.

Thank you,

StrangerInParadise 23:41, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Userbox policy poll
Uniuniunium, the voting on the policy poll closed several days ago, so I've reverted your vote. If you've got an opinion on the poll, perhaps you should leave it on the talk page for the poll. Thanks -- stillnotelf   has a talk page  19:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:RIT Seal.png
Hello Uniuniunium, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:RIT Seal.png) was found at the following location: User:Uniuniunium. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:1941Haglogo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:1941Haglogo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Air Zoo logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Air Zoo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uniuniunium


text:
Andrea Lowell

Andrea Lowell (born January 17, 1983) is an American actress and model most recognizable from her Playboy magazine nude pictorials and on air work for a variety of Playboy TV programs.

Career
Lowell was the co-host of The Playboy Morning Show on Playboy Radio.

In 2006, Andrea appeared on VH1's The Surreal Life and then came back the following season as a cast member of The Surreal Life: Fame Games.

On November 20, 2015, at World Series of Fighting 25 Lowell was a guest ring card girl.

Personal life
Lowell attended the University of California, Irvine, where she pursued her Biology degree.

On December 29, 2009, Lowell married longtime boyfriend James Kim, who is of Korean descent, in Las Vegas.

title: Andrea Lowell