text:
Template talk:Repeated IP abuse

Purpose
Used to mark pages of anonymous editors who have been repeatedly blocked for vandalism.

Color
Personally, I preferred the yellow, stood out more. My eyes are in their mid-30's and didn't mind. I dont' really care about the vandal's eyes. :) Wikibofh(talk) 17:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, me too -- and my eyes are in their 50s. It's supposed to be uggily. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No, it's not supposed to be obnoxious. We got some template guidelines for talkpages which we should stick to.[[Image:Weather rain.png]] Soothing R  23:32, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Collateral damage warning

 * I prefer the the yellow - it carries more content, shall we say. But what I came here for was to suggest adding something the following
 * Note: This a shared IP Address. Please use only short blocks to limit collateral damage.
 * An example may be seen at . Regards, Ben Aveling 11:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Not all repeat vandals are shared-IP's, by any means. And of those that are, not infrequently the entire list of "contributions" is vandalism, whether it's just a single user at that shared address (the others not caring to do Wikipedia), or whether, as in the case of a number of schools, it's all a pile of young children each doing their own vandalism. Bill 13:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

I would also oppose the automatic inclusion of the shared IP comment. Some vandal accounts are shared, some are not. Shared IPs should be noted separately using the sharedIP template. Rossami (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree that sharedIP ought to be enough to warn admins off from applying long blocks, but at leasts in the case of 202.6.138.33, it isn't. Otherwise, point taken.  What about "If this IP Address is shared, ..."  Regards, Ben Aveling 15:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * So what if the IP is shared? Nothing prevents an individual user, though using the computer at some school, from registering. Serious users already very much tend to register: ignoring the shared-IP and blocking a whole school for a month, or even AOL, would be a powerful inducement for serious editors to register: what harm is there in that? (As for whether admins pay attention to things, by and large they don't; the whole question of vandalism has got so out of hand that in the case at least of the 210 articles I follow, the great majority of edits are vandalism and reverts. The solution is to require registration with traceable e‑mail. Anyone who thinks this would kill Wikipedia may note that registration has been required now for several months for the writing of new articles, and it hasn't done the least damage to anything.)Bill 16:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Registration alone does not solve all evils. Remember that an IP block also blocks all signed-in users who are connecting from that IP address.  Ben is correct that long blocks should be used very sparingly against IPs.  Rossami (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Uh, did you read what I wrote? Why would I have written it if I didn't know that blocking the IP blocks everybody? The question really is not about the wording of a template that the overwhelming majority of people won't read, but about preventing vandalism. In my view, precisely, it is not correct that "long blocks should be used sparingly": since so far there has been no solution to the vandalism problem, to get to one, we need to start thinking outside the mindless box that has been created for us. Bill 16:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

 * There is a push for a form of blocking that locks out anons and new user registration while still allowing registered users to edit which might one day help solve this problem. See http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3706 and http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550
 * 550 proposes a flag on IP blocks to say if they block everything, block anon editing, or block anon editing and account creation. 3706 is different, but not all that different. It proposes a flag on accounts to allow them to edit through IP blocks. More discussion may be found at Blocking policy proposal.
 * If either bug is ever implemented, it will help. But for the moment, shared IPs are a problem we have to live with. Regards, Ben Aveling 16:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Bill, I'm sure that you would never put a long block on a shared IP. But the fact is, people do it.  If we do not give them a gentle reminder in this template, what do you suggest we do?  Or are you in favour of long blocks on shared IPs?  Regards, Ben Aveling 16:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC) PS. You make a good point that SharedIP should also carry a similar warning.  I'll follow up on it, but I don't think that's sufficient, both because that template won't always be present, and because it is this template that is actively encouraging and authorising the use of blocks.
 * Ben, actually, I would — as above. Not to worry, I'm not an admin, and despite flattering queries, am not running for admin, either. Absolutely nothing prevents the serious editor from registering, and thus detaching themselves from AOL as it were. Yes, I'd block all of AOL if the vandalism got bad enough. In fact, of course, with these rotating IP's, that's not what would happen: one of the rotating IP's would be blocked, and the same proportion of vandals would get thru on the others, with afew people occasionally being mystified that they couldn't edit.... Short of requiring traceable registration for editing (just as on the overwhelming majority of bulletin boards) there is no solution to the vandalism. I would encourage serious editors to join me in refusing by and large to revert vandalism — to go on strike — If enough of us did that, the articles would quickly liquefy, and the people who really run this show (i.e., Jimbo) would change the rules. Bill 17:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by 'detaching themselves from AOL'? Do you mean changing ISPs?  Regards, Ben Aveling 16:53, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Not the clearest writer, am I? I merely mean that, by registering, although whatever IP they're assigned to each time is still one of these AOL numbers, the Wiki software no longer lumps them in with AOL or its IP's. If I were on AOL, for example, and found myself blocked because of some idiot, well — I'd register. Therefore blocking even all of AOL doesn't do the slightest harm to anyone: we've just got to think outside the box. Bill 17:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Um, if you are a registered user on a blocked IP, you're still blocked. Regards, Ben
 * I just wish they made users sign up before editing. 90% of anonymous edits has to be vandalism. It's not so muc that it'll stop vandalism, it's just another hoop to jump through. And you need to insert a strong, highlighted message referring to collateral damage. I've been hit around five times by it thanks to vandals and it's no help. michael talk 23:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Width=100%
Why is the width 100% and not 80%? Off! 02:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Why would you want it to be 80%? 100% would seem to be the most efficient use of the space on the screen.  Rossami (talk) 04:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It can be more discreet, and more readable and ethical with all text in a central area. --Off! 04:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ummm... you lost me there. When I switch it to 80% and preview it, the template changes from 2 lines deep to 3 lines deep on my screen.  Since it's a colored template, that appears to make it less discrete.  The word-wrap does nothing that I can see to impact readability one way or the other.  And I really don't know what you mean by "ethical".  Please explain?  Rossami (talk) 05:03, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

This template is often used in conjunction with other user talk header templates such as, , , , etc., all of which use the standard CSS classes and therefore are 80% wide. With only this template at 100%, the combination looks really awful. I think the width should be kept consistent; if you want it to be consistently 100%, feel free to propose the change at MediaWiki talk:Common.css, but for now the standard width in 80%. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Also, basing layout decisions on how a given line wraps on your screen is rather pointless. For example, on my screen the current 100% layout has almost all of the text on one line, except for "further warning." which wraps to the next. For me, the text would look more balanced at 80% or even 60%. Of course, for anyone else it'll look different again. In general, for any given width there will be someone on whose screen the text will fit on n lines save for one word on the n+1th. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Clarification: I agree that different widths can look more balanced. I was responding to Off!'s comment that the 80% width made it more "discrete" which I interpreted as "takes fewer lines on the page" - an assertion which I do not believe can be true.  Going to a narrower screen width could be the same number of lines or more lines but cannot take less lines unless you simultaneously changes something else like font size.  I will take your suggestion to propose a change to the standard at MediaWiki talk:Common.css.  Thanks for pointing it out.  Rossami (talk) 13:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, for me, making the width 80% would make the box narrower without making it any taller. So yes, for me the 80% version would indeed clearly be more discreet.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 14:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Usage
Is this a template that should only be put on by admins or if anyone comes across an ip that seems to be getting blocked a lot can they put it on?--Crossmr 18:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It probably shouldn't be used by an anon or very new user but anyone actively working on one of the Vandalism Patrols should be able to apply the template. Just be sure to check the block log carefully and be sure of your facts before applying it.  Remember that sometimes a long list is the result of multiple admins blocking in rapid succession for a single event or that the list can be inflated if someone has to reset the block to a shorter time in order to fix a problem of collateral damage.  Rossami (talk) 02:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Substitution
Is it really necessary to substitute this template? It only has 444 uses and some of them can be removed, as they are in inappropriate places. I hate unnecessary substitution because the wording of the message cannot be modified on the templates already placed, and the template code can really clutter up a page, especially when more than one template has been substituted. Sometimes I cannot tell where one template ends and the other begins. -- Kjkolb 09:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with not substituting this template. Could you give a few different examples where they are in inappropriate places? --Geniac 14:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I noticed this template among the list of templates that should NOT be substituted, but the decription used recommends substituting. I trust someone will decide and fix it. -- Belegûr 16:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Done, although not before time! I created a subpage for documentation per current practice (WP:DOC), and changed it to say NOT to subst this one. --Darkwind (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

How many blocks qualify?
What qualifies as 'repeatedly blocked'? Twice? SaltyBoatr (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't usually apply it until 4 or 5 but I could see fewer if the breaches were especially egregious and there were no positive edits in the user's contribution history. Rossami (talk) 04:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Removal from talk page by the "owner" of the page in question
Users and IPs are allowed to remove warnings from their talkpages, but are they allowed to remove a repeat vandal template from their talkpage? I haven't seen this issue brought up anywhere. It would defeat the purpose of this template if an IP removed this from their talkpage. Of course, there would be exceptions, like if a helpful contributor "inherited" the IP of a vandal, but in general, shouldn't the removal of this banner from a IP's talkpage be disallowed (is that even a word? :])? --- cymru lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 22:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Editprotected request involving this template
This message is to inform people monitoring this talk page that there is an "editprotected" request involving this and several other templates at Template talk:! cymru.lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 20:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Request
Can you add category to this template? blastertalk! see 10:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Request
change to Fazbear7891 (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 14 June 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Just to get it out of the backlog, in general moving templates is completely pointless. Jenks24 (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Repeated abuse → Template:Repeated IP abuse – This template is being used only for IP address talk pages. The name should be changed so that it fits with the template itself. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 00:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC) TL22 (talk) 23:34, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Should be centered?
This is the only standard top-of-talkpage message box I see that is left-positioned rather than centered on the screen. As a result, it looks like a mistake when used in a set of such message-boxes.

{{box|left margin=4em|width=80%|1=

{{!}} class="messagebox standard-talk" {{!}}- {{!}} {{!}} style="text-align: center;"{{!}}This IP address has been repeatedly Blocking policy{{!}}blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to vandalism{{!}}abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Administrator intervention against vandalism{{!}}Notify an administrator • Special:Contributions/{{!}}contribs • Special:Blockip/{{!}}block • [ block log] {{!}}}

}}

It is currently hard-coded as a table for layout. Should it instead use tmbox to get standard talkpage-messagebox layout? DMacks (talk) 12:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

{{box|left margin=4em|width=80%| {{IPtalk}} {{Tmbox Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{PAGENAMEE}}}} block log] }}
 * image = Ambox warning pn.svg
 * textstyle = text-align: center;
 * text = This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.

}}

Would also be a good time to change the  hidden comment, since the template was renamed almost 9 years ago. DMacks (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

title: Template talk:Repeated IP abuse


text:
Kearny Code

The Kearny Code is a legal code named after General Stephen W. Kearny. The Kearny Code was promulgated in present-day Santa Fe, New Mexico on September 22, 1846 for use in the new New Mexico Territory, as occupied by the United States Army on August 18 during the U.S.-Mexican War. General Kearny on September 26 left with guide Kit Carson to engage in the Alta California theater of the war.

Origin
The code was printed on a Ramage press owned by Padre Antonio José Martínez known as the Cura de Taos, and prepared by Col. Alexander William Doniphan, of the 1st Regiment of Missouri Mounted Volunteers, receiving significant assistance from Lt. Willard Preble Hall of the same regiment. The code was based on the Bill of Rights and laws of Missouri, with emendations from the laws of Coahuila y Tejas, and the Livingston Code.

The Kearny Code became the basis of New Mexico law. It was submitted to Congress along with the Organic Act creating the Territory of New Mexico. It was amended by the territorial legislature, and after statehood by the state legislature, but many of its provisions remain substantially unchanged to this day.

Provisions
The promulgation consisted of three parts, a Bill of Rights, a list of appointments to civil offices in the territory of New Mexico, and Laws for the Government of the Territory of New Mexico. The Bill of Rights did not distinguish between citizens and non-citizens, but granted rights to all persons. It contained most of the safeguards of the United States Bill of Rights and others from Missouri. The laws were mostly verbatim from a copy of the Missouri statutes that Private Hall, who was a Missouri attorney, had in his saddlebags.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Kearny Code


text:
Asbjørn Kloster

Asbjørn Kloster (21 December 1823 – 18 January 1876) was an educator, social reformer and leader of the Norwegian temperance movement in the 19th century.

Background
Asbjørn Olsen Kloster was born in Vestre Bokn in Bokn, Rogaland, Norway. His ancestors were farmers on the islands in Boknafjord. He grew up on the Boknaberg farm. His parents were farmer (and later merchant) Ole Endresen (1795–1883) and Martha Asbjørnsdatter Kloster (1800–1880). At eight years of age, he was sent to live with an aunt on the farm Vik at Rennesøy. He was married to Marie Elisabeth Knudsen from 1861.

Career
After his confirmation Kloster moved to Stavanger, where his parents had relocated. Kloster worked as a salesman, first at his father's shop and later for others. During the period from 1842 to 1845, Kloster came in contact with the Religious Society of Friends movement in Stavanger. The Quaker Movement had first got a foothold in parts of Rogaland, Norway with sailors who had served as British prisoner of war during the Napoleonic Wars. In 1846 Kloster was recruited for a year studying in England, by English Quakers who visited the city. He subsequently translated Quaker literature and followed the English-speaking Quakers as an interpreter on their travels to Norway, Denmark, Iceland and the Faroe Islands.

For thirteen years, from 1848, Kloster operated a Quaker school (Kvekerskolen) in Stavanger. During the 1850s Kvekerskolen became the largest private school in Stavanger, with up to 100 students. Kloster wrote several textbooks himself, including a catechism, a reader and English textbooks.

Asbjørn Kloster played an active role both as a minister, teacher and as a publisher. In 1859, Kloster founded the first total abstinence society in Norway, (in Stavanger yngre Afholdenheds-Forening), in Stavanger. The founding meeting was held by Kloster's initiative on 29 December 1859, with about 120 participants, and 30 persons signed up for membership in the new society. The society was soon renamed Stavanger Totalavholdsforening. The following year he began to publish the Norwegian language temperance magazine Afholdsblad mod Brugen af alle Slags berusende Drikke uden som Medicin, also called Afholdsbladet (in 1861 renamed to Menneskevennen meaning Friend of Man), which he published monthly until his death 15 years later.

Kloster moved to Christiania in 1861, where he also founded a temperance society. He moved back to Stavanger in 1863. The nationwide society (Det Norske Totalafholdsselskab, DNT) was founded by Kloster in 1875. At the time of Kloster's death in 1876 DNT had a total of 7,000 members, distributed among 40 local chapters. The Stavanger chapter had around 1,600 members.

Kloster also operated an import business which specialized in the sale of glass, stoneware and porcelain which he imported from England.

Honors
A statue of Asbjørn Kloster was raised in Stavanger in 1912. A Norwegian postage stamp was issued in his honor during 1959. A street in the Storhaug borough of Stavanger was named after him in 1903. He is buried at Kvekergravlunden in Stavanger.

Other sources

 * Fuglum, Per Asbjørn Kloster, pedagog, forkynner og avholdspioner (Lunde, 2004) ISBN 82-520-4737-8
 * Nag, Martin Nytt lys over Asbjørn Kloster og hans nærmiljø i Stavanger, Ryfylke og Christiania (Kvekerforlaget, 1986) ISBN 82-90311-42-7
 * Nag, Martin Asbjørn Kloster - folkebevegelser og alkohol (Rusmiddeldirektoratet, 1989)

title: Asbjørn Kloster


text: Category:Tourism in Nauru

title: Category:Tourism in Nauru


text:
Talk:U.S. Route 219

Contradiction
See the first and final sentences of the second paragraph under New York. -- T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 18:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Grammar / sentence structure
The phrase "The interchange is set up as such that drivers can exit..." should be either "The interchange is set up such that drivers can exit..." or "The interchange is set up as such so that drivers can exit..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.10.94.35 (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

U.S. Route 219 in Virginia and West Virginia
Should there be a state-specific article for U.S. Route 219 in Virginia and West Virginia, or should there two separate articles for each state? -User:DanTD (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:U.S. Route 219


text: Talk:Wes Walz

title: Talk:Wes Walz


text:
Dennis Vacco

Dennis C. Vacco (born August 16, 1952) is an American lawyer and Republican Party politician. He graduated with a B.A. from Colgate University in 1974, a J.D. from the University at Buffalo Law School in 1978, and was admitted to the New York State bar in 1979. He is to date the last Republican to serve as New York Attorney General.

Background
Vacco was born in Buffalo, New York, and was raised in the western region of upstate New York.

As Erie County Assistant District Attorney
Vacco was an Assistant District Attorney of Erie County, New York from 1978 to 1988, and United States Attorney for the Western District of New York from 1988 until the beginning of the Clinton administration in 1993.

As Attorney General of New York
Vacco was the Attorney General of New York from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1998.

1994 election
In 1994, Vacco defeated Karen Burstein, the Democratic nominee. One week before the election, Staten Island Borough President Guy Molinari announced that Burstein was not qualified to serve as attorney general because she was a lesbian. The combination of Molinari's remarks, a strong national Republican showing, and the win of George Pataki in the governor's race, led to Vacco narrowly defeating Burstein. The New York Times called Molinari's remarks, "gutter politics."

Selected cases
Vacco brought national attention through a series of prosecutions brought against internet service providers, including Dreamscape Online, for distributing child pornography. The principal defendant, Buffnet, eventually pleaded guilty to a charge of fourth degree facilitation of a felony and was fined $5,000.

Vacco played a prominent role in New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's attempt to require Time Warner Cable to carry the Fox News Channel. An attempt by Vacco to bring an anti-trust violation charge against Time-Warner failed.

As attorney general, Vacco also argued the landmark assisted suicide case Vacco v. Quill before the United States Supreme Court. He successfully defended the state's ban on the practice, winning the case by a 9–0 vote.

1998 Election
In 1998, Vacco was defeated in his bid for re-election by Democrat Eliot Spitzer, by a margin of approximately 0.6% of the votes cast. He was the first attorney general in New York since 1925 to not be re-elected to a second term.

Electoral history
Vacco's electoral history has been tracked, online, at Our Campaigns, and it has been reflected here.

 * Vacco also ran on the Conservative Party of New York ticket in this election.

 * Nancy Rosenstock also received 13,416 votes (0.29%) for the Socialist Workers Party in this election.
 * Vacco also ran on both the Conservative Party of New York and Tax Cut Now tickets in this election.

Post-political career
Less than two months after he concluded an antitrust settlement with Waste Management, Inc., a waste disposal conglomerate, as one of his last acts before leaving his position as attorney general, Vacco joined Waste Management as a senior lobbyist and vice president for government affairs for their operations in New York, New England, and Canada. In response to questions about the settlement and the job offer, Vacco said: "Any interpretation or suggestion that this settlement - which included the United States Department of Justice - was connected to my employment by Waste Management - is preposterous and false."

As a lobbyist in New York State, Vacco was identified as having made inconsistencies in required filings. In April 2006, after a six-month investigation, Vacco was cleared of allegations that he violated lobbying regulations. The investigation "centered on whether Vacco’s firm had an illegal contingency-fee contract with a Rochester businessman in exchange for helping him win a casino deal with an Oklahoma tribe." In October 2005, Vacco’s lobbying firm agreed to pay the state $50,000 in connection with the questionable contract, but it was not required to admit wrongdoing."

Vacco is currently a partner in the Buffalo, New York law firm of Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman, LLP.

In 2017, Vacco unsuccessful defended controversial Buffalo School Board member, Carl Paladino after his employment was terminated for misuse of confidential information and making what many called racist comments about former president Barack Obama during a magazine interview. After a hearing before the New York State education committee, it was determined that the Buffalo School Board had the right to terminate Carl Paladino’s employment, no further legal action was taken by either parties involved.

title: Dennis Vacco


text:
Talk:List of Asian XI ODI cricketers

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of Asian XI ODI cricketers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070819162749/http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Seasons/IND/2007_IND_Afro-Asia_Cup_2007.html to https://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Seasons/IND/2007_IND_Afro-Asia_Cup_2007.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140906154128/http://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Seasons/AUS/2004-05_AUS_Tsunami_Relief_Fund_2004-05.html to https://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Seasons/AUS/2004-05_AUS_Tsunami_Relief_Fund_2004-05.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150529084014/http://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Seasons/RSA/2005-06_RSA_Afro-Asia_Cup_2005-06.html to https://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Seasons/RSA/2005-06_RSA_Afro-Asia_Cup_2005-06.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070819162749/http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Seasons/IND/2007_IND_Afro-Asia_Cup_2007.html to https://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Seasons/IND/2007_IND_Afro-Asia_Cup_2007.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Team
I wonder why Asia XI redirects to this article. The team will play the series in 2020 as T20I matches but this is a list for ODI cricketers. I think there should be a separate article for T20I cricketers, or a disambiguation page just like World XI. Human (talk) 08:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I (or someone) will create the list of Asia XI T20I cricketers nearer the time, either when the squad is announced or after the games have been played. I imagine no article was ever created specifically for the Asia XI (as a team) as it was a short-term limited team. My guess would be that nearer the time, when the list of twenty 20 players has been prepared, then the 'team' link on the series will be pointed there instead. Or someone (feel free...) can create the article Asia XI (cricket). See also World XI (cricket) which goes to a disambiguation page. Bs1jac (talk) 08:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:List of Asian XI ODI cricketers


text: Talk:U.S. Route 319

title: Talk:U.S. Route 319


text:
Let Me Entertain You (Robbie Williams song)

"Let Me Entertain You" is a single by English singer-songwriter Robbie Williams, released by Chrysalis as the fifth and final single from his debut solo studio album Life Thru a Lens (1997). It was written by Williams and Guy Chambers. In March 1998, the track peaked at No. 3 on the UK Singles Chart. It is certified gold for sales of over 400,000 copies.

Background
Williams and Chambers were inspired to write a 'Who-esque' song after watching the Rolling Stones film Rock and Roll Circus together.

"When we started writing the demo there was a furious jungle beat underneath it. It was so hardcore it got me very excited, and I still get excited listening to it now. It's not really heavy metal, it's more like camp rock opera!"

The lyrics are mostly innuendoes and double entendre, telling the story of a man trying to persuade someone to cheat on their boyfriend with him. Although the sex of this person is never mentioned, they are addressed mon cher, which means my dear only when referring to a male. In a 2010 interview, Williams was quoted as saying "An awful lot of gay pop stars pretend to be straight. I'm going to start a movement of straight pop stars pretending to be gay."

The 2004 track on the Greatest Hits album differs slightly from the original 1998 release. The song has been subtly remixed, and Williams' vocals during the instrumental have been removed entirely. This remix was also featured on the In and Out of Consciousness compilation album in 2010. The original track however, is still featured on Williams' official website and Vevo channel.

Critical reception
Alan Jones from Music Week wrote, "The fifth and final single to be lifted from Robbie Williams' Life Thru A Lens album, "Let Me Entertain You" is a fast and furious retro rocker with hints of both "Pinball Wizard" and "Sympathy for the Devil". Almost a pastiche, it lacks the subtlety and wide appeal of "Angels", and is likely to have a much shorter chart career, though a high debut is very likely."

Music video
Directed by frequent collaborator Vaughan Arnell, the video features the Robbie Williams Band who are dressed as members of the band Kiss. Williams' makeup is very similar to Gene Simmons' on-stage persona, The Demon, while the outfit Williams wears is nearly identical to a stage costume worn by Simmons' bandmate Paul Stanley. In doing so, the video has been called a "stylistic appropriation" of Kiss and a spoof of 1970s rock in general, while displaying its own characteristics of camp and self-parody.

After Simmons filed a lawsuit against King Diamond for using the makeup design in the 1980s, Williams had concerns over Kiss taking legal action against "Let Me Entertain You", but felt the makeup was necessary to get into character. No legal action was taken.

Live performances
"Let Me Entertain You" became Williams' concert opener for most of his shows throughout his career. He enjoys opening shows with high energy performances of the song "because of what happens to the audience... this is going to make you do this right at the beginning of the set." To date, Williams has given more than 300 live performances of the song.

Williams performed the song for the Brit Awards' opening act in 1999, and as the opening act for the Diamond Jubilee Concert as part of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II's Diamond Jubilee celebrations in 2012 in front of an audience of an estimated 500,000.

He also performed the song at the Live 8 Concert at Hyde Park in 2005, to high critical acclaim. In a BBC documentary about the event shown that Christmas, Richard Curtis described the performance as ecstatic, comparing Williams to "a man who hasn't had sex for two years [finally] coming." David Baddiel likened the set to Queen's iconic performance at Live Aid in 1985, and Williams himself commented that "the audience just went ballistic." When interviewed, members of the audience commented that Williams' performance was the first time of the night they could hear the audience singing at the back of the field.

As with many of Williams' live performances, he often improvises with the melody and changes the lyrics to suit the venue or event. One notable example of this was during the Progress Live tour in 2011 following his reconciliation with his former band Take That after 15 years apart. The lyric "You're my rock of empathy" was replaced with "Hello [venue] remember me?"

Williams rarely sings the chorus himself, often relying on the audience and backing vocalists to carry the song for him as he shouts words of encouragement for the audience. However, on the Swings Both Ways Arena Tour in 2014, Williams performed a jazz arrangement of the song, instead singing "Let me enter you" to individual members of the audience during the chorus.

A popular pop-rock anthem in most European countries, the song has been covered live by several artists, including Bon Jovi, Westlife and the cast of Duets. Five singers have performed the song on Syco's talent show The X Factor.

Influence and reception
The song was found in a survey by Mind to be one of the top three songs for happiness. It has been called arguably one of the most well-known songs of the 1990s.

"Let Me Entertain You" is often played during news reports or interviews with Williams, and is frequently played to welcome him to the stage during chat shows and other personal appearances. It was also used as the title of a best-selling biography of Williams.

The song is not only used in association with Williams. It was the only song featured in the video game Actua Soccer 3, it was played at the end of the football match in Mean Machine and was also featured in a UK commercial for the Sega Dreamcast.

After his 2009 album Reality Killed the Video Star received mixed reviews, Williams joked he should have titled that album Let Me Underwhelm You.

The song has been covered by other artists, including VoiceMale, who inserted lyrics from Steppenwolf's "Magic Carpet Ride".

Formats and track listings
These are the formats and track listings of major single releases of "Let Me Entertain You".

(Released 16 March 1998)
 * UK CD1
 * 1) "Let Me Entertain You" – 4:24
 * 2) "The Full Monty Medley" featuring Tom Jones – 5:28
 * 3) "I Wouldn't Normally Do This Kind of Thing" – 3:07
 * 4) "I Am the Res-Erection" – 3:48

(Released 16 March 1998)
 * UK CD2
 * 1) "Let Me Entertain You" (full-length version) – 5:19
 * 2) "Let Me Entertain You" (Stretch 'N' Vern's Rock 'N' Roll Mix) – 11:10
 * 3) "Let Me Entertain You" (Amethyst's Dub) – 7:47
 * 4) "Let Me Entertain You" (Robbie Loves His Mother Mix) – 7:49
 * 5) "Let Me Entertain You" (The Bizzarro Mix) – 5:50

(Released 18 March 1998)
 * Australian CD
 * 1) "Let Me Entertain You" (LP version) – 4:22
 * 2) "The Full Monty Medley" featuring Tom Jones – 5:28
 * 3) "I Wouldn't Normally Do This Kind of Thing" – 3:08
 * 4) "Back for Good" (live version) – 3:49
 * 5) "Let Me Entertain You" (Amethyst's Dub) – 7:47


text: Category:Hotels in Cuba

title: Category:Hotels in Cuba


text:
User talk:Glemnim~enwiki

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * --Dpr 18:45, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Han Suyin
Thanks for your help at Han Suyin --Dpr 18:45, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Glemnim. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Glemnim~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Glemnim~enwiki


text:
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Asian XI ODI cricketers

List of Asian XI ODI cricketers
A complete list with no red links, jguk 18:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks good, but will it be maintained in the future? The table creates a horizontal scrollbar in lower resolutions, a font size of 90% might solve the problem. Next, under the "Bowler" columns, "Best" seems to have some misplaced information. Please verify. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  13:21, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Dealt with (at least I think so, if I've gotten the font size thing wrong, could you change it for me?). The article will need updating once a year at the end of each Afro-Asian Cup, I see no reason why it won't be maintained, jguk 19:46, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I've fixed the width issue. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  08:35, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Support =Nichalp   «Talk»=  11:18, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support if the additional players are added when the team plays next year.  Páll  (Die pienk olifant) 18:36, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support -- Ian ≡ talk 02:36, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The pic of Muralitharan is bleeding into the table headers. Other than that, Support.  Guettarda 22:44, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm experiencing the same thing that Guettarda is. But support anyway, good table. --Spangineeres  (háblame)  03:38, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * NOTE: This nomination has been extended to the full fortnight-long period. It will close at 18:46 on 22 October, jguk 20:53, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Mylakerye

Welcome, from Journalist Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello. My name is Orane (but I go by the name 'Journalist' on Wikipedia) and I am one of Wikipedia's Administrators. I just stopped by to say Hi and to formally welcome you to Wikipedia. Thank you for your awesome contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I know that being here for the first few days may be a bit confusing, but you'll get used to it pretty soon.

Here are a few good links for newcomers. I know that they can be boring, but I recommend that you take a look at them:
 * Policies and guidelines
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can come to my talk page if you have any questions. If Im online, I will definitely respond. If I'm offline, you can go to Where to ask a question. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~) ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Again, welcome! Come say Hi! →Jo urna list >>talk<<  18:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:LindaMcCartney.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LindaMcCartney.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Julianlennon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Julianlennon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:John68.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:John68.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fallout boy 05:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Leela.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Leela.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Wideprairie.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wideprairie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nagel-Futurama2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nagel-Futurama2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Don't Get It Twisted.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Don&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:30, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wideprairie.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Wideprairie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wideprairie.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wideprairie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mylakerye


text:
List of constant species in the British National Vegetation Classification

The following is a list of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens which are constant species in one or more community of the British National Vegetation Classification system.


text: Category:Tourism in Cuba

title: Category:Tourism in Cuba


text:
User talk:Slatfalt

Slatfalt 18:50, 8 October 2005 (UTC) Hello. This is a placeholder message.

title: User talk:Slatfalt


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaMOO

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep -- (drini's page| ☎ ) 01:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

MediaMOO
nn 172.216.62.139 18:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete per nomination. - 172.216.62.139 18:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, A Google search shows plenty of interest in this, including references to papers in academic journals about this MOO. Perhaps I'm being overly paranoid here, but I'm wondering about 172.216.62.139's motives in proposing this for deletion.  The user's contribution history show that the only edits he/she has ever made was to add external links to several other entries on MOO and propose this article for deletion.  There has been a history of link spamming with other MOOs, and I wonder if this is just one MOO owner trying to increase the relative importance Wikipedia gives his own site.  My apologies in advance to 172.216.62.139 if I'm off base here.  --RoySmith 21:10, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I remembered that name from memory without being ever involved and that must mean they are at least somewhat notable. Besides it's pretty old. --Shaddack 19:43, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:JLeigh

[Resolved] Possible sockpuppet
Please see User_talk:Used2BAnonymous for presentation of evidence and discussion. // Pathoschild 06:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Although possibly a well-intentioned "meatpuppet", discussion has revealed that this user is likely not a sock puppet.The notice has been removed. // Pathoschild 22:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello JLeigh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dominick 18:47, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

User:Dominick
Hello, JLeigh, I am hoping you will pay a visit to this page and act as a witness to Dominick's attitudes and tactics with regard to the Traditionalist Catholics entry. Thanks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Dominick

Used2BAnonymous 11:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:JLeigh


text:
Buni Zom

The Buni Zom group is a prominent mountain area of Chitral, in the Hindu Raj range of Pakistan. Buni Zom (main) is the highest peak of the group with an elevation of 6542 m. It is located about 50 km (30 mi) northeast of the town of Chitral, and about 50 km (30 mi) east of Tirich Mir (7,708 m), the highest peak in the Hindu Kush.

In 1957, the New Zealanders W.K.A. Berry and C.H. Tyndale-Biscoe accomplished the first ascent of the Main Peak of Buni Zom from the steep razorlike north ridge The second ascent was in 1975 by Japanese Masao Okabe, Hideo Sato and Shigeru Tabe and third ascent was in 1979 by Americans Joe Reinhard and Richard J. Isherwood both from south face.

The Buni Zom group has many other peaks, some of which have been climbed. There are 12 peaks over 6000 m in the Buni Zom group which are unclimbed Himalayan Index.

Peaks of the Buni Zom Group
Following is a list of the peaks over 6,000 meters in the Buni Zom group, from the Himalayan Index. The first ascent of the peak named Buni Zom SS or 6MT or P6110 was by Nikolas Kroupis and George Voutiropoulos on 31 July 2007 this climb is not yet recorded in the Himalayan Index, but the article is published in American Alpine Journal

title: Buni Zom


text: Category:Theatres in Canada

title: Category:Theatres in Canada


text:
Talk:Conservatism in Canada

Moved in

 * Now that Conservatism in North America has been split into American conservatism and Canadian conservatism, the following material from the former article obviously belongs here. I think it already is here, but I am not familiar enough with Canadian conservatism to judge.  Therefore, before deleting it from the American conservatism article, I've copied it below, where those interested can integrate it into the current article if they like. Rick Norwood 18:48, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

In Canada, conservatism followed British tradition well up into the 1980s, when the leadership of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney brought with it Reagan-style economic liberalism and free trade. Afterwards the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada changed to moderately favouring economic continentalism as opposed to the economic nationalism that it had previously promoted. However, many Canadian conservatives continued to favour the traditional Red Tory ideology of supporting economic independence (protectionism) and preservation of existing political and cultural institutions. At the same time, many "small-c" conservatives in Canada (especially in the western provinces) abandoned the PC Party to join the outspoken western activist Preston Manning and his Reform Party of Canada, which advocated even greater laissez-faire economic policy and stronger social-conservatism. In 2003, Canada's oldest political party (the PC Party) was disbanded and controversially merged with the Canadian Alliance (the descendant of the Reform Party) to create the new Conservative Party of Canada. The new party is arguably right-wing or neoconservative, although in early 2005, its political platform had yet to be fully developed, due to an election called by Liberal Party of Canada Prime minister Paul Martin in 2004. Although the new party increased its number of seats in parliament during the 2004 election, from 72 combined PC and Alliance seats to 99, its combined vote dropped significantly from 38% to only 29%, indicating that many Progressive Conservative voters did not vote for the new party. Recent polls have indicated that the new party is still haemorraging support thanks largely to their leader Stephen Harper and the extreme social conservative platform that the party advocates. The old Canadian conservative divide between Blue Tories (so-called "neoconservatives" and libertarians, mostly from the richer western provinces) and Red Tories (so-called "moderate" conservatives, mostly from Ontario and the poorer eastern provinces) is not as strong in the new party: most of the old PC Party's most prominent Red Tories, such as former Prime Minister Joe Clark, anti-free trade activist David Orchard, former Quebec Member of Parliament (MP) André Bachand, openly gay MP Scott Brison and others chose to oppose the merger and not join the new party.

Title
Why is this article called "Canadian Conservtism" and not "Canadian conservatism"? Is it about conservatism as a political ideology, or about Conservative parties only? Ground Zero | t 15:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Reviewing the article further, I see that it includes the BC Liberal, the ADQ, BU Unity, the Progressive Canadian Party, and so on, so it is not about Conservative parties, but about conservative parties. I will move the article accordingly. Ground Zero | t 19:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Reference to Bloc Quebecois
I have removed a part of a paragraph making mention of the Bloc Quebecois. It seems to have been included because they may have a few conservative-leaning ideas and particularly because it has a handful of former Progressive Conservatives who joined the party. However, for all intents and purposes the Bloc Quebecois is regarded in Canada as a moderately democratic socialist group, and you would be hard-pressed to find any political commentator who would have any major disagreement on that point. Conservatives who joined the party did so mostly because they were interested in the sovereignty effort. Derekwriter 19:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

strange misuse of 'neoconservative'
This article repeatedly uses the word neoconservative in a manner that appears to be idiosyncratic, and not in keeping with its usual definition (for which see our article on the topic). The Reform Party of Canada is described here as "neoconservative", for example, which I have never seen before, and at times this article even seem to use "neoconservative" as a synonym for "neoliberal", which is quite seriously confused. --Delirium 11:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

 * I agree, this article is extremely biased. I will try to work on it in the next week. Rizla 20:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Neoconservatism and Neoliberalism are interwined. Neoconservativism is a strong proponent of neoliberal economics, which includes free-trade agreements - essentially free-markets. Neoliberalism has nothing to do with social liberalism. Halogenated 04:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Suggestions To Improve The Article
This article requires a more thorough cleanup, as in its current form it inadequately lays out the history of conservative ideology and movements in Canada. Everything should be spelled out clearly, be logically arranged, and defer to a more neutral reading. I'd advise future writer/editors to pay more attention to the following areas:

 * The ideological roots of Red Toryism and the personalities and policies that defined this uniquely Canadian ideology: how did the likes of Grant and Camp articulate the Red Tory vision, and how was it put into practice by Diefenbaker, Davis, Clark, Lougheed, Roblin and others who engineered social policy?

 * Expand upon the rise and fall of Mulroney and his coalition of Western populist conservatives, Eastern Red Tories, and Quebec nationalists. What brought these groups together, why did they succeed in capturing back to back majority governments, and why did they fracture along ideological lines into three separate parties following the fall of Meech Lake?

 * An editor above claims to have excised references to the Bloc Quebecois based on his own personal perception that they are NOW a left-leaning party. It is a gross betrayal of the history of the conservative movement and ideology in Canada to remove them from this article, regardless of their perceived ideological positions now. The Quebec nationalists in the Mulroney PCs overwhelmingly backed the Blue Tory revolution. Why? Someone has to write about the shift from the strong federalism of the Red Tory tradition to the new decentralist attitudes of the Blue Tories, a significant factor in capturing the support of Quebec.  Without the support of the Quebec faction of the PCs, Mulroney simply would not have been in power.  Mulroney's decentralist agenda was THE compromise issue that kept both the Western and Quebec factions within the party until Meech Lake.

 * Similarly, in respect to Quebec, one can trace a thread between the old soft-nationalist, social conservative Union Nationale and Ralliement des Creditistes down to the Quebec conservatives in the Mulroney government that later broke off to form the Bloc Quebecois. It was only after the break from Mulroney that the Bloc became a "big tent" party that welcomed sovereignists and nationalists of various political stripes, and there was arguably a drift from conservatism over time.

 * The section concerning Social Credit needs to be cleaned up, and the ideological differences, and historical trends of the movement in Alberta, British Columbia and Quebec need to be separated more clearly. The Alberta Social Credit party was originally based on social credit theory, and was the heart of Christian conservatism in Canada, inspiring the Reform Party. The British Columbia party, on the other hand, never embraced social credit theory. They emerged as the "free enterprise" successor to the Conservative-Liberal alliance that was formed to keep the CCF from power, a coalition that included moderates, Red Tories and social conservatives. The reference to "staunchly conservative policies" should be removed, as it is both loaded and meaningless.

 * The way conservative ideology and movements coalesced in the West is certainly more complex than what is represented here. Manitoba, for example, tended toward a very Eastern-style Red Toryism in provincial politics, and often did not share the same populist protest-style conservatism the three other provinces had.  Also, while Christian social movements in BC and Alberta were generally conservative and grouped around the SoCreds provincially and the PCs federally, in Saskatchewan and Manitoba Christians tended toward CCF-style social democracy.

 * I would argue against using the word neoconservative at all in this article, as it never really gained a foothold as a descriptor in Canada. It is rarely used in the media, by political commentators or by activists themselves. It is perhaps completely irrelevant to Canadian politics.  Hipsterlady 02:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Neoconservatism in Canada
It's easy to identify ideological neo-Conservatives in the United States. They tend to be well educated, and sometimes have affiliations outside of politics. Examples include Irving Kristol, Bill Kristol, (Canadian born) David Frum, Richard Pearle, (Canadian born) David Brooks, Paul Wolfowitz, Allan Bloom, and Leo Strauss.

Who personifies neo-conservatism in Canada?

No one. Neo-conservatism is a special little isolated branch of thinking, who follows that prof from Chicagos teaching, it is premised on American exceptionalism. See the UK documentary called "Power of Nightmares" to learn about neoconservatism. It is an ideology specific to the US, and not exportable, or exported. Ottawakismet (talk) 23:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Neoliberalism and Neoconservitivism are related
I suggest reading Professor Stephen Clarkson UNCLE SAM and US University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2002. Also subtitled "Uncle Sam and US - Neoconservitivism and the Canadian State" (Clarkson is a professor at the University of Toronto.)

In the Canadian (economic) Context, Neoliberal and Neoconservitive are pretty much interchangable terms. Canadian Neoconservitism is basicly economic neoliberalism : "Free" Trade, deregulation, privitization, government downsizing. From the evidence of the past Liberal federal government, and the observations of this book, I would add the Federal Liberal Party as a "Neoconservitive" Party and as "Neoliberal". Clarkson writes of the "Mulrooney-Chretien era", having consistant policies dealing with free trade, taxes, and government spending.

Paul Martin was Chretien's finance minister, as Prime Minister his first act was a spending freeze subject to his review. Martian said with pride as he delivered a budget, "This is the biggest demobilization of ".. Canadian governemnt/civil service... [I can't recall the exact word he used ] " since World War II."

The former Liberal Government took Neoconservitive positions in international trade (evidence: ratifying NAFTA with no substantial changes (1993), negociation of the M.A.I. (1997), expansion of Free Trade to Chile and others.

Filling in the gaps
Lots of work needed here.

We have a huge gap from the death of Macdonald all the way to Joe Clark, nearly a hundred years. I've made some chapters of what I think should fill in the gap, much of which relies upon Diefenbaker's memoirs.

I find it incredible that we have an article here without a single link to Preston Manning. I will add more on the history of reform, and you can't really talk about progressive conservativism without also talking about how it never was successful until Mulroney altered it for his own purposes. We have a considerable amount on Clark, but nothing on poor Stanfield who ran under the PC banner longer then anyone else.

Benkenobi18 06:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Writing and References
The quality of writing here is good, but there are absolutely no references to back up any of it. I'm not necessarily disputing what has been written, but without some referencing it could be easily seen as biased and one person/group's perspective. Halogenated 04:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Baldwin a Tory?
Since when? Baldwin was a Reformer, the Reformers are the ancestors of the Liberals. Furthermore he argued for resposible government and cooperation with the French; reducing the powers of the governor and anglo elites, a most un-tory position. He was more moderate than his Reform ancestors like Mackenzie, but he was a Reformer notheless. After the Baldwin era, then Tories reconcilled themselves with responsible government and the French fact, and that's why Macdonald and Cartier worked together so well, but before that the Tories were the party of the elite and governor against democracy and against the French, and they weren't shy about it! Kevlar67 18:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

History section
Instead of retalling the entire history of conservative parties it should only deal with commonalities and general trends. Sections on specific eras should only summerize and contain links to the important figures and movements, and parties, for example: etc.
 * RB Bennett
 * John Diefenbaker
 * Canadian social credit movement
 * Reform Party of Canada

Will do more then I have more time. Kevlar67 (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Merger is a bad idea

 * No to merge. Hadrianheugh (talk) 05:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Section reorg
The sections have been reorganized for better consistency with the more developed articles Conservatism and Conservatism in the United States. Lionel (talk) 10:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Conservatism in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091117053729/http://www.macleans.ca:80/columnists/article.jsp?content=20070129_139786_139786 to http://www.macleans.ca/columnists/article.jsp?content=20070129_139786_139786

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Conservatism in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060207/michael_fortier_060207

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Conservatism in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160216225409/http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=989079 to http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=989079

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Conservatism in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150127073734/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=15c68d91-edff-467f-9045-6f8c44c631d3 to http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=15c68d91-edff-467f-9045-6f8c44c631d3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110417030205/http://www.techeye.net/security/canadian-conservatives-promise-big-brother-laws to http://www.techeye.net/security/canadian-conservatives-promise-big-brother-laws
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130411114740/http://life.nationalpost.com/2011/04/04/social-conservatives-watch-campaign-from-sidelines/ to http://life.nationalpost.com/2011/04/04/social-conservatives-watch-campaign-from-sidelines/
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130411110253/http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/09/26/john-ivison-kenney-defies-pm-over-abortion-motion-as-leadership-jockeying-begins/ to http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/09/26/john-ivison-kenney-defies-pm-over-abortion-motion-as-leadership-jockeying-begins/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160112171849/http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=a4efd075-8a9d-423d-8844-a1bbd02f56c4&sponsor= to http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=a4efd075-8a9d-423d-8844-a1bbd02f56c4&sponsor=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge with List of conservative parties in Canada
Conservatism in Canada already has a list of conservative and right-of-centre political parties which appears up to date, and the non-list information either already is or can be integrated into the Conservatism article. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Conservatism in Canada


text:
Sven Aarrestad

Sven Eivindsen Aarrestad (8 October 1850 – 19 January 1942) was a writer, politician, and leader in the Norwegian temperance movement during the 19th century.

Biography
Sven Aarrestad was born at Varhaug in Rogaland county, Norway. He was the eldest of six siblings born to his parents, farmer Eivind Torkelsen Aarrestad (1820–1902) and Inger Svensdatter Skretting (1829–1922). When he was four years old, his family moved to Årrestad in the community of Time, where he attended private school. From 1868 to 1869, he attended the teachers' college in Egersund. He was a teacher from 1869 to 1873 in Høyland. From 1873 to 1875, he went to the seminary in Stord. From 1875 to 1876, he was a teacher in Brevik, from 1876 to 1878 in Tønsberg, and from 1878 to 1891, managed a high school at Sande in Vestfold. He was a farmer in Sande from 1891 to 1906 and the mayor of Sande from 1899 to 1906.

The work of Asbjørn Kloster had aroused Aarrestad's interest in the temperance movement. In 1877 he published his first book on this topic Kom og hjælp os!. From 1883 to 1905 and 1922 to 1927, he was editor of Menneskevennen, which was published by the Norwegian temperance movement (Det norske Totalafholdsselskab). He was chairman of the Norwegian temperance movement from 1887 to 1927. He published more than 100 books and pamphlets, most regarding the use of alcohol. From 1892 to 1894, he represented Jarlsberg and Larvik in the Norwegian Parliament. From 1900 to 1909, he was a member of the executive committee of the Norwegian Liberal Party. From 1906 to 1908, he was Minister of Agriculture in Michelsen's Cabinet and Jørgen Løvland administration. In 1908, he was appointed County Governor of Nedenes amt.

In 1901, Sven Aarrestad was decorated Knight, First class, and in 1908 Commander of the Royal Norwegian Order of St. Olav. Aarrestad was also the holder of the Grand Cross of the Order of the Dannebrog. His last years were spent on his property Soltuft in Arendal, where he died 1942.

Selected works

 * Kom og hjælp os!, 1877
 * Bibelen og Afholdssagen, 1889
 * Samlagsspørgsmaalet, with Andreas Lavik, 1895
 * Praktisk sundhedslære for skole og hjem, 1900
 * Vort Stræv mod Rusdrikkene: Indlæg i Døgnets Strid, 1905
 * Avholdsfolket og det nye ølet: foredrag, 1913
 * Elisabeth Edland. Et liv i det godes tjeneste, 1920
 * Ta lærdom av livet, 1923
 * Min stilling til forbudet i 1911, 1926
 * Om avvæpning (1927)
 * Den store sak i vår tid, 1930
 * Spredte trekk fra kampen om forbudet i Norge, 1933
 * Asbjørn Kloster og litt om den tid som fostret ham, 1935
 * Brev til Annie, 1935

title: Sven Aarrestad


text:
Keihanshin industrial region

The Keihanshin industrial region (京阪神工業地帯) encompasses the Japanese cities of Kyōto, Ōsaka and Kōbe and their surrounding prefectures.

The term Keihanshin is composed of one character (kanji) of each of the cities, but in their Sino-Japanese reading: kei of Kyōto [京]都; han of Ōsaka 大[阪], shin of Kōbe [神]戸.

title: Keihanshin industrial region


text: User:Gibraltarian

title: User:Gibraltarian


text:
User talk:Opiaterein

ATTENTION.

Although it's been a long time since I realized it... a lot of Wikipedians make this project utter shit. It still has its uses, but I'd rather not have anything to do with most of the more active editors I've run across. Wikipedia is a prime example of why you can't give every halfwit with internet access a say in how things are run.

 * I don't give a shit if you don't find a subject notable enough. Wikipedia is NOT a paper dictionary. It doesn't have those limits. There is no reason to not include half of the shit you people want to delete.
 * I don't give a shit if the preload templates aren't good enough for you and you want a fair-use rationale for everything, even though they ARE GOING TO TEND TO BE THE SAME.
 * Policy is not the same as law.

That said, I'm going to make it "official" or whatever. I'm no longer an active editor here, so if you don't like a random edit I make at some point in the future: Don't take the time to fucking tell me about it. Just do whatever it is that you do. I don't want to know about it. That means don't edit this page anymore. Unless you're nice and don't want to talk about Wikipedia. Because I sure don't. — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 17:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Oneiroid Psychosis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oneiroid Psychosis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oneiroid Psychosis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 19:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Corpus Delicti (band)

The article Corpus Delicti (band) has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * WP:NN band fails WP:MUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 03:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Corpus Delicti (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corpus Delicti (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Corpus Delicti (band) & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 03:28, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Gypsy 83 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gypsy 83 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gypsy 83 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Pax 05:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Soil Bleeds Black

A tag has been placed on The Soil Bleeds Black requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Kingdom & Its Fey

A tag has been placed on The Kingdom & Its Fey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of March of the Infidels

A tag has been placed on March of the Infidels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of May the Blood of Many a Valiant Knight Be Avenged

A tag has been placed on May the Blood of Many a Valiant Knight Be Avenged requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alchemie

A tag has been placed on Alchemie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Quintessence (The Soil Bleeds Black album)

A tag has been placed on Quintessence (The Soil Bleeds Black album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:46, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mirror of the Middle Ages

A tag has been placed on Mirror of the Middle Ages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:46, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gypsy 83 (soundtrack)

The article Gypsy 83 (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Non-notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica ✿ / talk 04:10, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Contrasts (Aziza Mustafa Zadeh album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Contrasts (Aziza Mustafa Zadeh album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Contrasts (Aziza Mustafa Zadeh album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 23:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Inspiration (Aziza Mustafa Zadeh album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inspiration (Aziza Mustafa Zadeh album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Inspiration (Aziza Mustafa Zadeh album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 23:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jazziza for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jazziza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jazziza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kambriel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kambriel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kambriel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chrisalder (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Between Earth and Sky (album)

A tag has been placed on Between Earth and Sky (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Initiation (Rhea's Obsession album)

A tag has been placed on Initiation (Rhea's Obsession album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rhea's Obsession albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Rhea's Obsession albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 08:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Opiaterein