text:
User talk:Journalist/Archive 4

Thank you
Hello, I thank you for your support to my adminship, and I am sure that we shall be around contributing and building the encyclopedia. Please keep a watch on me and your advice shall be always valuable. --Bhadani 09:20, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Michael Jackson, stranger in moscow
WHy was my information erased at that page? SmoothCriminal 16:03, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism of your user page
Aww. You changed it back and did not even make a good comment, No fun! I guess my change was not witty enough for you to have liked it :) Qaz 00:09, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

THANKS
Thank you so much for such a strong comment on my RfA. I won't let you down. Molotov (talk)  22:42, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

User Categorisation
You were listed on the List of Caribbean Wikipedians page as living in or being associated with Jamaica. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Jamaica for instructions.--Rmky87 03:33, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The last time I'm spamming you all with Esperanza stuff
Hello Journalist. As you may or may not know, there have been some troubles with Esperanza. So now, as a last ditch to save the community, please vote at Esperanza/Reform on all neccisary polls. P.S. I'm very sorry for spamming you all with these messages, and this will be the last time. I recommend putting ESP on your watchlist. Cheers and please look at that, let's stop the civil war then. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 02:47, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Thak's for your help
Hi Journalist,

I'm wrinting just to thank you for your help, I'm goncalves67, and I left a message to redwolf24, but he was to busy, us you say in your message so I'm thanking you for all. I hope I can do anything good in here, let's see. Again, sorry for my inglish. Well I still have some problems to put a good photo in that article about the Countess of Frederiksborg, sorry for this, but I'm a great fan of her, if you could help me about just that I would be greatful to you. Well thank's again for everything

Goncalves67 05:55, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

P.S. And if the photos are from a magazine that I have?, How can I use them? Sorry again......

RfA
Just to say thanks for supporting my RfA. Please let me know if you see me screw up. --Doc (?) 19:05, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Reflection
Thanks for the welcome I'm glad that you made it clear that you were not a bot, having a bot welcome me would have been a little dismaying. You seem to me to be very witty, as well as smart, and I look forward to future talks with you and everyone that wishes to. KnowledgeOfSelf 20:09, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Your welcome
Your welcome. Yesterday was my first day editing Wikipedia although I know about most of the policies and other things because I have been visiting this site frequently since March of this year. I have been thinking of nominating LGagnon, Harro5 and Jobe6. I fear though that if I nominate any of them now then they will be rejected because of my low edit count though. Type O Spud 20:18, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Its just that I know that new editors (I'm not a stranger to policies though) usually have a stigma that even though they are acting in good faith that they are not doing whats best. Type O Spud 00:03, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Support for your RfA
You're welcome. In case you're interested, I didn't know about your last RfA, but this message caught my attention and made me decide that if I didn't find anything to change my mind when looking through your contributions, I'd make a point of voting for you if you ever went up again. It's nice to see some mildness in the middle of a string of attacks on both sides! Ann Heneghan (talk) 22:22, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Fair use images
Please review the images you are using on your user page. It appears that several of these are on Wikipedia under the fair use clause of US copyright law. However, fair use will generally only apply in circumstances where the subject matter is being discussed and commented on. In most circumstances, it is unlikely that this applies to images on user pages. As such, most instances of fair use images on user pages should be removed. Dragons flight 09:57, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Love Takes Time...and so did this.
Okay, I know we had some disagreements in the past, and I said a lot of things I shouldn't have. So I offer this Peace dove to you. I'm sorry :). Extraordinary Machine 12:44, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Maybe, someday we can reach that state, EM.

good luck
good luck with your rfa. i'm pulling for you.--Alhutch 19:36, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Your RFA
Thanks for reminding me. Going to look at it now. OmegaWikipedia 20:08, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

 * You're welcome. Hopefully the votes of support will keep coming. :) Ac  e  tic  ' Acid  03:04, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Could I ask for you to assist me
Hey, good luck on your admin i reverted my vote to support after seeing your work on the Celine Dion looks very nice compared to the before, which brings me to my request for help i'm not sure how to put images into articles i've written and you seem to know quite a bit about it so please let me know on my talk page,User talk:KnowledgeOfSelf (The articles in question are there)

Thank You
Thank you very much it was extremly helpful it's much appreciated! (You Make Me Smileeee in my hearrtt "Kanye West") :-D KnowledgeOfSelf 00:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Winters
Good luck with the winter. I don't miss them, SqueakBox 20:18, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

RFA
No problem. I trying to get into all the different areas of Wekipedia and see what's going on. By the way if you think the winters bad in the south where you live you should try it up here. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather 20:23, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

re: thanks for vote
Anything for a fellow journalist (ok, I'm just a blogger). BTW, I like your new sig. Your old one was a bit hard to read.

 * Good luck as an admin, Journalist...your vote was a no-brainer, and I appreciate you be accomodating about your signature. It's certainly appropriate now (and the gradient effect is tasteful, I might add). Christopher Parham (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hi, I dont believe that we have conversed, but I keep seeing you on my watchlist, and I think that Im justified in giving you this: Jo urna list  |  huh?
 * Awww, thanks. As you mentioned, we haven't run in to eachother so far, which is the only reason I haven't voted support on your RfAr, but luckily it doesn't look like you'll need it; Therefor I'd like to use this opportunity to preemptively congratulate you on your adminship and beat the rush. --fvw *  21:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmm, that looks like I'm implying you're electioneering, which of course you're not. Just explaining my lack of vote for a good contributor --fvw *  21:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

On an unrelated subject, your new sig appears to be having some trouble with runaway boldface, I think it's because you're not closing your 's. Also, using the date template isn't quite what you're looking for, as it just gets included which means all the dates in your signatures always display the current date instead of the date you made the comment (I fell for a similar trap once trying to put the time in a nicer format in my sig). --fvw *  21:14, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the congrats. Greatly appreciated. By the way, do you have any idea how I can format my sig so that the date shows. I think Ive tried everything. →Jo urna list   >>talk<<
 * Yup, it's Impossible, sadly. This has annoyed my quite a bit too. --fvw *  00:16, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Wait, are you asking how to specially format the timestamp that appears with signatures? What are you typing to sign your entries? — Knowledge Seeker দ 01:53, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Journalist, I just tested your signature. If you go to Preferences, enter all the HTML, then check off Raw Signatures, it should work with four tildes. Ac  e  tic  ' Acid  23:00, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Aw, thanks. The true gift is seeing you finally conform to the norm and join the Time Stamp Club. :P Ac  e  tic  ' Acid  00:41, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Just to jump in on this sig discussion, is there a userpage or something that explains the wonders of setting up the signature with all the bells and whistles and possibly gives some examples? Qaz 11:06, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Mediation
Hello, Journalist! Thanks for your support of my mediation committee nomination; I'm pleased to announce that I'm now an official mediator. Thanks once again. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | WS 20:40, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Since your WP:RfA seems all but decided, let me congratulate you now.

Michael Jackson
Thanks for the message.

Heal the world Foundation - http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,45857,00.html Skin bleach found during raid - http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/010605jackson.html

HTH

Journalist's RFA
Your're welcome - it was well-deserved for all the work you've put in. Dl yo ns 493  Ta lk   07:33, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Sig help
Thanks for your help. -- Qaz  ( talk ) 18:50, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

I read on your talk page you like jokes so here goes..
A father asks his ten year old son Johnny, if he knows about the birds and the bees....I don't want to know; Johnny says bursting into tears. Confused, the father asks Johnny what is wrong. "Oh Daddy Johnny sobs, at age six I got the "there's no Santa" speech. At age seven I got the "there's no Easter Bunny" speech. Then at age eight you hit me with the "there's no Tooth Fairy" speech! If your going to tell me now that grown-ups don't really screw, I've got nothing left to live for!

 * Congrats on your RfA looks like it's "in the bag" KnowledgeOfSelf 19:41, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Question-Answered,One More Joke,Thank You, And Help Please
Where I got that joke is from a book that was a birthday gift from my ex girlfriend;More Adult Only Jokes, and here's one more that's one of my favorites.....

 * A wife wakes in the middle of the night to find her husband missing from bed. She gets out of bed and checks around the house. She hears sobbing from the cellar. After turning on the light and descending the stairs, she finds her husband curled up in a little ball crying. "Honey whats wrong" she asks, he replies "Remember twenty years ago, I got you pregnant? And your father said I had to marry you or go to jail?" She says "Yes of course" He says "Well, today I would have been a free man!"
 * Thanks for the award brought one of those deep chuckles from my belly lolKnowledgeOfSelf 21:43, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I wrote an article on the Immigration Restriction League, and its rather short and im not sure how to mark it as a stub, i would love if you could tell me how on my talk page or if you would mark it yourself either way i'd be very much obliged KnowledgeOfSelf 23:13, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

LOL that was good, see if i can 1 up ya
A newly wed couple are in their honeymoon suite, the husband is a burly 6'4 250lbs and his wife is a petite 5'5 120lbs, as they are getting ready to make love, the busband throws his pants to his new wife and says "put these on", she does, and says "they are much to big i can't wear your pants" and the husband says "exactly and don't you forget it!" So his wife takes off her panties and says "try these on" he does and can only get them up to his knees, he says "i can't get into your panties" and she says thats exactly how it's gonna stay until your attitude changes
 * and how about this one..
 * A man stumbles up the only other patron in a bar and asks if he can buy him a drink. "Why of course" comes the reply. the first mans asks "Where are ya from?" "I'm from Ireland" replies the second man. "You don't say, I'm from Ireland too! Lets have an other round to Ireland!" Of course replies the second man" curious the first man asks "Where in Irelandd you from lad?" the second man replies "Dublin" "By God man me too, lets have an other round to Dublin" "Of course" replies the second man so the first guy really curious now asks "What school did ya go to lad?" "Saint Mary's" replies the second man "I graduated in 62' Me to exclaims the first man. By this time one of the regulars comes in and sits down at the bar, "Whats been goin on" he asks the bartender The bartender says "Oh nothing much, the O'Malley twins are drunk agian. KnowledgeOfSelf 21:17, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your vote on my RfA. It's great to see you there among the first to vote! BTW, I stole your "Attention: RfA" notice; hope that's ok. :) Owen× ☎  03:49, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Thank you for your support of my recent nomination on RfA. Best regards, RobertG ♬ talk 09:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

RFA
Thing is, I've been on Wikipedia for a while now, and the fact that we have 7 or so RFA nominations a week means that we would need to have 7 or so long time users with awareness, consideration, and care. Unfortunately, we don't. There have been 2-3 lately that are simply outrageous. When a person writes an article on his favorite song and immediately nominates it for FA, and it lacks references, verification, a lead, etc., what we're seeing is not merely someone who is incorrect in the nomination, but someone who doesn't feel the need to read the standards, doesn't care that folks work for months on an article, hasn't read any past FA's. The same is true of some RFA's.  We have seen multiple vandals nominate themselves to administration. Since those persons are making the nomination as yet another childish bit of insult -- another attempt at farting in the elevator -- I don't think that our careful, delicately phrased oppose votes are called for. If a harsh comment in that case persuades the vandal that his next identity isn't going to pass, either, and isn't going to induce a paroxysm of self-doubt from us, then a harsh comment is not only good, but useful. I felt that was the case in the instance you mention. The other harsh one lately has been Kappa, and I sincerely believe that what's at stake with him is far greater than merely an RFA's politeness, as Tony Sidaway's (rude) "defense" (which had been lodged before I came along) shows. That instance is longstanding. I will not wear the thick gloves when anyone who ridicules VfD nominators or says "no nominations of schools" because Schoolwatch exists. In general, you'll see my votes as effusively polite or not there. Look, for example, at the neutral vote lower down.

I suppose what I'm saying is that I will not be too deliberative with the vandals and trolls, and the others have to have campaigned and/or disrupted Wikipedia to get a harsh comment, and, again, I do not feel very many newbies are bitten (and actual newbies really ought not go to RFA) or innocent are lashed. As ever, if you feel that there has been blood spilled or injustice performed, do feel free to contact me, as it is not my intent and, generally, not my belief that it should happen. Geogre 10:01, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Michael Jackson
Howdy, Journalist. claims that "King of Pop" and "Wacko Jacko" were excised from Michael Jackson's intro based on discussion somewhere that included you. I can't find it at Talk:Michael Jackson. Any clue what he's talking about? Previous consensus was that both nicknames belong in the intro, and I don't think that's changed. Thanks, android  79  14:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I figured he was either misremembering things or making things up – this is the same editor who has removed references to "Wacko Jacko" from the article at least 10 times and has defaced the talk page just as much. Thanks for your timely response. android  79  18:54, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

hi back
Hi Journalist,

thanks for the welcome, I'm getting used to the fine points of editing and contributing.

Paulc1001 20:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Who's RfA
Thank you for supporting my masters RfA. He appreciates your support and comments and looks forward to better serving Wikipedia the best he can. Of course I will be doing all of the real work. He would have responded to you directly, but he is currently out of town, and wanted to thank you asap. Thanks again. --Who's mop?¿? 20:48, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Journalist/Archive 4


text:
Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Redwolf24

 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for bureaucratship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Redwolf24
Vote closed early because outcome is clear  (45/24/7)

– Well let's see... I have thousands of edits... I am often found interacting with other users, I've closed hundereds upon hundereds of AfD's, closing entire days by myself before. I think I know my share on consensus. I would now like to be a bureaucrat, partly to establish a firmer consensus at changing usernames (CU is down), partly to help promote those who need it, as I remember back during my RfA I was annoyed at how it took hours to be promoted, I guess I was that eager. For more on my resume, I've assumed leadership of WP:MC and got it up and running and organized WP:RFM. As the head I also promote candidacies at WP:MC to mediator once I feel a strong enough consensus has been reached. Note that there I have promoted people I voted for, as I'm the only one who promotes them and I definitely didn't fiddle with consensus as they all had 100% support (with the exception of Flcelloguy who had Sam Spade's opposition, but all voting mediators supported). Now, to present the fact that will probably cause this RfB to be rejected: My first edit was April 20, 2005. 6 months of editing. Well, bureaucratship is a big deal, and I understand all your concerns about not supporting someone unless they've been here for (circle one:) 1 year, 2 years, 1 year an admin, etc. However I don't believe this should be the case. Have I proved myself trustworthy? Would I use my tools when I'm not sure? As you may see in my edit count, I have over 3000 user talk edits, so I'm no stranger to user interaction, and I would always establish a bureaucratic consensus before promoting on the tricky ones. Also there's one stone cold rule I'd adhere to: do not promote on an RfA I voted for.

Oh, one other bureaucratic argument for opposing: Do we really need more bureaucrats? Well I don't know, the more you have, the better the consensus. For example, if we had a three member congress/parliament in our respective countries, and these three guys decided everything for everyone, it would be amazingly corrupt and an unfair representation. I would be there to help replace retired bureaucrats as Cecropia and Uncle Ed. Nichalp and Rdsmith4 are doing a fair job, but I bet they could use some help. Also note that I am often delisting failed candidacies, before a dogpile of opposes occurs. Does adding new bureaucrats HURT the wiki in any way? Anyways I submit myself now to the community, vote as you feel appropriate. Addendum: note that I had an RfC recently, but so far I have about 60 people saying I was free of error, and I think just wiki brah saying I was too harsh.

 * I wanted to co-nom this RFB, but apparently Red had put it up while I was asleep. Yes, we do need more bureaucrats. RFAs have increased in the recent past, and in many cases I notice that the candidates nom still languishes after its expiry time. Redwolf does help out on this page, so he's not new to the role of a bureaucrat. Since I am hard pressed for time these days, I think Redwolf would be ideally suited to this role while I am offline. =Nichalp «Talk»=  14:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I normally would prefer not to selfnominate, but I feel bureaucratship should be as such. So yes, I accept my own nomination. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 00:01, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) OkiedokiedokiedaeforRedwolf24!He shall suceed!Amen![[User:tdxiang|Father Tan Ding Xiang [[Image:tdxiangat13.JPG|300px]] ]] 12:18, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Strongest Possible Support Outstanding User --JAranda'' | watz sup 00:07, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote Change to Neutral --JAranda'' | watz sup 23:33, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1)  Do we really need more bureaucrats? ;-) ∞ Who ? ¿ ?  00:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Extreme... I mean, happy to support a highly qualified candidate. Bishonen | talk 00:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Yay! Shauri  [[Image:Heart.gif|11px]]  smile!  00:11, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) No, no way, no how, damnit!, Ohh no, wait, sorry, I was thinking of someone else :P, Support gkhan 00:12, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Support we need bureaucrats more than ever with the possible implementing of access to checkuser for them. Redwolf24 is a great guy, he most surely deserves it. -Greg Asche (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Support...period.  Rob e  rt  00:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, definitely. Bureaucratship should be granted liberally. Andre ( talk ) 00:19, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) 'Oppose - What kind of crazy person would even consider giving *THIS* guy bureaucratship? err...I mean Support. :) -- Phroziac ( talk )[[Image:Flag_of_Phyzech_Republic.svg|25px]] 00:20, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Send to the psychiatric ward -- I mean -- Support ;)  Sango  123   (talk)  00:26, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Strange. I could have sworn I already voted. It seems I didn't. --Maru (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) delete nn - too few google hits and fails WP:MUSIC. Erm... is this the right page? (PS. Support) Grutness...  wha?  00:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Be careful what you ask for, you might just receive the Support to get it. --Allen3 talk 00:38, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) For Great Justice!!! Ryan Norton T 00:41, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) There was a comparison to Linuxbeak below, so I'll say what I said then - Support - the experience [can be called] a bit light, but I've had nothing but productive dealings here, and no indication that the lack of time conceals anything worrying. Always good to see a name I know. Shimgray | talk | 01:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Support, excellent admins make excellent bureaucrats. Er, I hope. --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 01:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Strong Support, he's an excellent guy, regardless of his age or seniority. - Pure  blade  | ☼ 01:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Support: I believe guidelines such as time or edits are important factors, but never the deciding factor on their own. Redwolf is almost ubiquitous throughout Wikipedia and on the related IRC Channels. As for the maturity issue, I say that isn't even relevant unless it gets in the way of his work on here, which has been quite the contrary for the most part.(sometimes the best way to diffuse a tense situation is saying something completely random). He's helped me out time and time again, and I expect him to help out all of us as a Bureaucrat. Karmafist 01:52, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) Support In most cases, I would say that there's no way I'd support for bureaucratship after this short of time, however, I'll make an exception considering all the experience with dealing with problem users, mediation, closing AFD's, etc. Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 03:00, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. I agree with Y0u. I normally wouldn't support after this length of time editing, but Redwolf has done amazing work; seems to have breathed life back into the mediation committee; displays a lot of common sense; and is very easy to get along with (is in fact a pleasure to get along with). I trust his judgment. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 13) Very strong support - In terms of the level of trust the community has in him, he already is a bureaucrat. The way I see it, bureaucrats get very few extra tools but are the most visible and accountable people on Wikipedia. Those are two qualities which he possesses already - is there any reason whatsoever to believe that he would make bad, rash, un-thought-through decisions? --Cel e stianpower hablamé 08:04, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 14) Support. Redwolf24 is a good user, and someone who would actually do well as a bureaucrat; he's shown that he doesn't mind doing a lot of "dirty work" for Wikipedia by being very active across Wikipedia.   Ral  315   WS  08:42, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 15) Support I've never felt time or lack thereof really mattered very much. -orizon 12:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 16) Fir  e  Fo  x  12:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 17) Strong support. How can we let time spent on the project matter more than intent? Surely it's far more preferable to have someone who has, say, racked up five thousand edits in a fortnight than someone who has been a Wikipedian since 2001 and has got about five hundred edits. There's certainly enough evidence here of good intent to validate this RfB, and so there's really no alternative but to support. JDH Owenstalk 14:04, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 18) Support see above. =Nichalp «Talk»=  14:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 19) Support 1st rate admin -- Ian ≡ talk 15:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 20) Support. He may be young--in more than one way:)--but he has nonetheless proven himself up to the task. If he can do AfD work and other daily admin task so well, that he can certainly be a good beaurocrat. Such higher tasks are really just the same as the old ones, but with more serious matters; in either case, he will mainly uphold consensus, with personal judgement serving only as a tiebreaker. Voice of  All   @  |  E  |Merit  16:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 21) Support Maybe too early for Arbcom, given the lack of content edits, but already his volume of community work has been greater than much users who have been around much longer. His work already proves that bureaucratship would prove no problem for him. 172 | Talk 21:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 22) Support. Has done great work, age and experience shouldn't matter that much. N (t/c) 23:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 23) Support. Has clearly shown that he can be trusted with the promote button, and I'm sure he understands how to use the rename button too. Now that hardworking Cecropria has retired, there's a lot more work for everyone else to do. Let's allow Redwolf24 to take up the slack. Uncle Ed 23:32, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 24) Support... on wheels!. Talk about self-confidence (in a good way), and it seems more bureaucrats would be a help. My only question is, when do we see Essjay's nomination? the wub  "?!"  23:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Back when Essjay and I were up for adminship, I told Essjay I intended to one day become a bureaucrat. Essjay said that adminship would be good enough for him, so I doubt he'll ever run. Also, my real bureaucratic running will be in April, but I still appreciate every ""vote"" cast here. :) R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 23:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Essjay is indeed satisfied with being an admin. The only way I would run for bureaucrat is if I saw a demonstration from the community that they wanted me to serve in that capacity. Until then, I shall remain (quite contentedly) a humble admin. -- Essjay •    Talk 01:49, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. A fine fellow, Redwolf has been unfailingly helpful and courteous towards me, and has shown what I consider to be exceptional dedication and commitment to the workings of the project. He has a particular understanding of what makes Wikipedia tick (which I admittedly lack) which I have always been impressed with; in addition, his ability for problem solving, and for gathering consensus from groups of people, would I believe make him an excellent bureaucrat. In short, I could not consider there to be a better candidate, looking at his accomplishments so far. --NicholasTurnbull  | (talk) (e-mail) (cabal) 00:28, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Ive decided to disrupt my Wikibreak to Support Reds in his quest. A fine fellow who would make a very good bureaucrat.  Or an   e   (t)  (c)   (@)  01:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Merovingian (t) (c) ( e ) 04:13, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Strong Support. If Ilyanep became an admin when he was 13, that tells me that there's no reason 15-year-olds can't be bureaucrats if they show good judgment, Which Redwolf24 has. Also, to say that making a few jokes makes him unfit for the position is quite false. I've never seen him to be less than serious when the situation requires it. Tito xd (?!?) 04:28, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. We need more bureaucrats to handle all the new requests for adminship. — J I P | Talk 12:47, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. If we are to be bold in the way we do things, then appointing a breath of fresh air to the bureaucracy should help our cause. I would, however, caution Redwolf24 about the tendency to act comedically. Bureaucracy demands very clear thinking and a manner of expression that commands uniform respect. Real-life comedians may be well liked, but we wouldn't want them in charge of many things, would we? -Splash talk 14:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) I've been thinking about this for a while; I hesitated because Matt is still relatively new here. But after thinking about it for several days, I am not convinced that "inexperience" outweighs everything else he has done and his potential to be an excellent b'crat.  So, after careful consideration Support.  Guettarda 14:29, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. I think he'd be great =) Sasquatch  t|c 19:48, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Support. Always helpful and informative. RW24's a shinning example of what a Wikipedian should be. PRueda29 01:35, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Support. Thanks for the mspaint of the disgruntled herb. AngryParsley 02:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) Support. You're the man now, www.ytmnd.com Red!. You've always been the man, but now you're even more manly...I guess.... Sure it'd be great to develop a huge case of (timecountitis?) and pretend that a user who makes 3 edits over the course of 2 years should be given something an editor with 10,000 (!) good edits, and a history of great user interraction, should not. I fully Support Red, and unless he does something really stupid, will continue to support him throughout. Thanks for listening, and good luck. - User:Mys e kurity|Mysekurity ]] additions | e-mail ]]03:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 12) yep yep -- (drini's page| ☎ ) 05:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 13) Support Yes, I think so too.  Ban e  s  09:03, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Oppose Neutral
 * 1)  Strong Oppose. I would like to see at least a bureaucrat candidate have a minimum of one year on Wikipedia; Redwolf24 has been editing for less than 6 months. With user name changes currently disabled, I also don't see much need for new bureaucrats at this time. Finally, the edit summaryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship&curid=2609425&diff=25621571&oldid=25618529 in which Redwolf24 added his RfB "OHNOES!!! I'M RUNNING FOR BUREAUCRAT!! (this user is insane)" doesn't exactly inspire trust or demonstrate maturity. Carbonite | Talk 00:22, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Your first objection is certainly understandable, but as for the edit summary, that's clearly just a joke. Andre ( talk ) 00:26, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I got that it was a joke, but it was pretty inappropriate since requesting bureaucratship is a rather serious matter. As a 15 year old attempting to prove himself mature enough for a very trusted position, I would have expected much more from Redwolf24. However, my main reason for opposing is that he just hasn't been here long enough. Bureaucratship is a big deal and I don't believe that expecting a candidate to edit for one full year is unreasonable. Given that we have plenty of bureaucrats to carry out the necessary duties, I don't think there's a need to promote any except the most qualified candiadtes. Carbonite | Talk 00:37, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Perhaps true, but the edit summary was clearly a joke, and should be taken as such. No one said a bureaucrat can't have a sense of humor.   Ral  315   WS  08:42, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I thought that was funny... editing the wiki doesn't have to be 100% serious business. -Greg Asche (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Perfectly acceptable - anyone running for Bureaucrat has to be a bit doolally. See also Catch 22. Grutness...  wha?  00:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Out of curiousity, why would you expect a bureaucrat candidate to be "a bit doolally"? Someone running for ArbCom, OK, I can see that due to the huge amount of work that comes along with the position. However, the only diffence between admins and bureaucrats is that the latter promote admins (and possibly change names should that come back online). I guess I just have different expectations for bureaucratship than a nice guy that makes jokes. Nothing at all against Redwolf24; I think he does a great job and I'd very likely support him after he's been here for a year. Carbonite | Talk 00:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * because they have to make the tough, controversial calls - arbitration, close votes, etc. They're like the referees or umpires in sport. No-one spots them when they're doing a good job, but everyone does when they stuff up. You'd have to be a little warped to not only be able to stand that but to volunteer for it. Grutness...  wha?  05:49, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Candidate does not demonstrate the maturity behooving someone in this position. Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 00:25, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose — while Redwolf24 does great work around here, I would like to see more time in Wikipedia. Linuxbeak's request for bureaucratship was rejected last month mainly due to his amount of time on the project, and I see great similarities: both Redwolf24 and Linuxbeak are great users and dedicated Wikipedians, but both have only been on Wikipedia for less than six months when each RfB for each was started. In addition, Redwolf24 has been an admin for less than three months (promoted July 23). Combined with the fact that I don't think we are in demand for more bureaucrats (though I would never oppose someone just because of that reason), I must oppose. Give it more time, Redwolf24, and I'd gladly support. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk |  WS 00:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) The user has really only been active on wikipedia since June this year, i.e. about 4 months. I believe a bureaucrat should have more experience than that. Shanes 01:11, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) --Boothy443 | comhrá 01:13, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Like I said on Linuxbeak's request for bureaucratship, I would prefer a few more months of experience serving as just an admin. And the other problem is the lack of experience overall; I do not want a bureaucrat with less than about 4 months of total activity. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I would like to add that another reason I vote oppose is the current discussions on CheckUser and Wikipedia talk:Quick and dirty Checkuser policy proposal. Some users have suggested giving the Checkuser feature to all the bureaucrats, and so I am extremely uncomfortable about the possibility of giving it to someone like Redwolf24 who has less than a few months of experience as an admin. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Refer to the comments section. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 01:38, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose Redwolf24 is clearly a model user whom I like and respect a great deal; but I must oppose due to lack of time. The time-window is a security against abuse. If there were a greater need for new bureaucrats, I may see this differently, but for now I think it's better to wait. I will be very happy to support if you renominate yourself later. --Ryan Delaney talk 03:33, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose, Sorry, but you do seem to be lacking in experience to be a Bureaucrat. Don't hit me for opposing. Private Butcher 04:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Redwolf24, You're a great user and a fantastic contributor to Wikipedia. However, I feel that bureaucratship is an important position, and that users who are promoted to this position must have demonstrated through time their commitment, maturity, and ability to handle conflict. I think, for the most part, you are doing a fine job with that, and have only but to continue in that path to achive your goal. However, I do not feel the amount of time you have been here is enough for Bureaucratship, nor do I feel the amount of time you have been an administrator is enough for that Bureaucratship. That is the primary reason I am voting oppose. Best wishes, and please continue the strong contribution you have been providing. Also, I personally thought the "Oh noooes" was funny. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 06:33, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4)  Relucantly Oppose, I think Redwolf24 is aiming for the title "Son of Jimbo" or something, leading the Mediation committee, running for arbcom, nominating himself for bureaucratship... too much power in the hands of one person makes me uneasy. one at a time, ok? Alphax τεχ 09:18, 16 October 2005 (UTC)  23:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Reluctant Oppose Matt, I'm sorry, but I feel that I must be fair, as I opposed Linuxbeak's RFB. A bit more time on the project would be a big help. It's not that we don't trust you or your sense of consensus. We want to make sure you don't burn out after 6 months. You've got a lot on your plate. You are an editor, an admin, the chair of the MedCom, the keeper of the Esperanza Spamlist, a candidate for the ArbCom... it goes on and on. All that in six months. Take it one task at a time. :) Ac  e  tic  ' <sup style="color:#FF8247;">Acid  16:51, October 16, 2005
 * 6) Oppose Too soon, as per Acetic and others. FreplySpang (talk) 18:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose. CDThieme 19:28, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose. After extensive discussions with Redwolf on IRC, I'm still not satisfied with his thoughts on consensus on a RfA, nor am I particularily happy with him using RfB as a mode of self-validation.  On top of that, he's recently taken over MedCom, an important role in Wikipedia on its own right, and I would like to see him prove himself out there a bit first.  Come back in six months or so, and assuming nothing goes badly in the interim I'll be glad to support.  Right now, I can't.  Sorry, my friend. Kelly Martin 19:38, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * # Oppose. Redwolf, it pains me to vote oppose, and you know that. However, everyone who has been opposing you on the basis of my RfB is correct. You need more time. You are obviously a mature individual and I will support you once you hit a year. I know you're not happy with me concerning this right now (over IRC), but I'm going to reiterate this: my running for bureaucrat that early was a mistake, but it established something (obviously): the Wikipedia community wants people who have been around for a while. I might be a very active administrator (one of the most active), but I'm certainly not one of the most experienced... yet. That's why I'm not going to even reconsider running until I hit one year. I highly suggest you do the same. Finally, one other thing: over IRC, you reacted a little bit too severely to me telling you why I opposed. A bureaucrat needs to be calm, cool, and collective. This is something that we both need to work on (I know I do); you've got to control your reactions to be as neutral as possible. Linuxbeak | Talk 19:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose Sorry but id like to see at least 9 months of activity before i vote support for a BUREAUCRAT. Job  E  6  [[Image:Peru flag large.png|20px]] 21:26, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. I agree that bureaucrats should be more experienced, and a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FFake_color_articles&diff=23956943&oldid=23793718 recent lapse in judgement (and his http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AVotes_for_undeletion&diff=23962650&oldid=23962491 defense thereof ) lead me to question this user's level of maturity.  —Lifeisunfair 22:28, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Very, very weak oppose. Redwolf24 is a great editor with a sense of humor and a great admin. However, the recent episode with the "on wheels" joke left him temporarily burned out and I'm not sure he's ready to handle being a bureaucrat, running the MC, etc., etc. Also, the answers to the questions below aren't quite adequate. Try running once you've been here about a year to a year and a half and I'll definitely support. H e rmione1980 23:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose for now - needs more experience as an admin, imo -- Francshttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Francs2000&action=edit&section=new 2000 [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 23:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose, for the same reasons as Evilphoenix.--nixie 03:09, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose per Hermione1980. I found the "on wheels" joke to be bad style. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose. I like Redwolf, but he hasn't been here that long, and I'm not convinced we need new bureaucrats. Xoloz 15:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose, come back in a year, and convince me that there's a need for any more bureaucrats. Proto t c 15:22, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose too irresponsible and too little respect for rules.--Silverback 01:53, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose, no compelling reason to make bureaucrat, not enough experience, too popularity-contest like. This is not to say that I don't like Redwolf24, because I do. silsor 04:22, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) Oppose. Great editor, fantastic personality, handles a huge workload, and probably built the Great Pyramid of Gaza with his bare hands. Seriously.  Give it a few more months and I will support without even the tiniest bit of hesitation.  Right now, though, he's just a little too green, and I'd like to see a little more experience first.  Sorry.--Scimitar parley 14:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Neutral I see only that there is not enough time in yet. I have no doubt as to Redwolf24's ability, his conviction to NPOV or his overall contributions, but would like to see a minimum of one full year of editing and six months as an admin.--MONGO 06:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Neutral. Redwolf24 is an extremely great guy, and has been very nice to me in the past. However, "OHNOES! I'M RUNNING FOR BUREAUCRAT!" did get to me. I don't want to Support, but I definitely (and I mean definitely) don't want to Oppose. --WikiFanaticTalk Contribs 2:13, 16 October 2005 (CDT)
 * 3) Neutral, regretfully. I don't think there is any question that Red & I are good friends, and that I think he is a great user. I will not oppose, as I believe Red will make an excellent b-crat one day. However, I'm concerned that there is too much on his plate and that he will become burnt out. I'd also like to see a few more months activity. Try again after the first of the year and you'll have my support. -- Essjay •    Talk 22:38, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Neutral. More time is definitely needed... but I have reconsidered my vote, and "oppose" is way too harsh. I'm changing from oppose to neutral. However, my comments in my previous vote hold. Linuxbeak | Talk 22:45, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Neutral regretfully as well Outanding User But one Word Time and also may burnout. Good Luck on your run for the arbitration committee and in the next Bureaucratship I will support big time but not now and sorry for the vote change :( :(  --JAranda'' | watz sup 23:33, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Neutral leaning opposeward. Not because Red isn't motivated to do the right thing and to make Wikipedia better, because he is, without question. Just too green yet; having looked at some previous calls (no, not the "on wheels" thing) I think a little more time on the project would be useful, with special attention on being able to defend your position in a calm, even-tempered manner no matter what you feel about it. And leading the medcom is a big job, anyhow (in addition to your other tasks); keep it up for a while and if you still don't feel like you're going to burn out, then consider this again. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:19, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Michael Snow repeats Mindspillage's comment.

Comments
 * Have you mediated? If so, where? Marskell 00:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes. I have done three cases on IRC, short term mediations. Kelly Martin once said that mediations, including who was involved, should remain confidential unless the users involved say other wise. Rvalles will allow me to say I did a case with him. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 00:21, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * OK. Do you have a link? Maybe something two or three months ago preceding this nom? "Bureaucratship should be granted liberally"-well, I don't think so. Onus is on opposers in RfA; onus is on nominators RfB! Not that this is an oppose!! Just curious. An absolute level-head (provable thru links) seems fair. Marskell 00:32, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * How could I link you to an IRC mediation? I hang out in #wikipedia a lot and people, knowing I'm the chair, just ask me. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 00:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Well an example of being level headed see User talk:Adamwankenobi R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 00:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Maybe you can't link to an IRC. Just looking for an intra-wiki example of your behaviour which your second example didn't really provide. That's all. Probably shouldn't comment on the obvious. Marskell 00:51, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Well let's see.. how do I prove I'm level headed. My proudest accomplishment would be mobilizing the defunct Medcom. I don't think I could do that without a level head... R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 00:57, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey, done. Don't need condescention. No vote for what it's worth. Marskell 01:03, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If my tone sounded condescending, I apologize profusely and I promise you it wasn't my intent. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 01:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Tone is a funny thing. Can't really accuse based on tone but you react to it ahead of everything, don't you? Anyhow, no vote. Marskell 01:14, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * As for my edit summary: I used obnoxious caps lock so people would be able to see it in Recent Changes patrol, as is far as I know, bureaucrat runnings are a big deal. But I'm not gonna put it in my signature, as that would make me bigheaded... R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 00:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I guess I feel like saying its dissapointing how any feeble attempt at humor is frowned upon, and those trying to joke get insulted. If the joke causes harm to the wiki, by all means. But if its harmless, I don't see your point. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 00:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Sort of reminds me of the treatment Ta bu shi da yu got on his second RFA nomination. He appeared to have clinched the promotion, but vandalised the featured article of the day as a joke, and everybody changed their vote to oppose in droves. This forced TBSDY to withdraw. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Re:Activity: From April 20 (my first edit) to early May I was in Europe. After that I edited frequently as an anon. And once again for the time thing: I don't think you should measure in days as much as hours. I've read every page in Category:Wikipedia_official_policy, and I spend about 6 hours a day here, almost every day. In that manner, I'm more experienced than a lot of editors. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 01:22, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Your comment reminds me of this advice I got from one of my mentors: Just because you read everything does not necessarily mean you can apply it to various situations, including ones that "don't go by the book". Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * From my perspective, I'd have to say recent events demonstrate RedWolf24 is pretty good at situations that don't go "by the book." Jdavidb (talk) 07:23, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Re:Linuxbeak: For what its worth, I have more than twice the edits of Linuxbeak. I have 2000 edits in Articles, User talk, and Wikipedia namespaces. Editcountitus of course, sucks. But I think I probably lurk around the wiki more than he does (though kudos to him on wiping away JarlaxleArtemis and MARMOT. Also, I'd like to refer to WP:RIG and User:JCarriker/Wikipediology/essays/Redwolf24-1. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 01:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Re:Checkuser: I would never use that unless I had evidence of sock-ness. I haven't abused admin powers, and I don't see why you think I would abuse that power. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 01:44, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I did not say anything about "abusing". All I said was that I was extremely uncomfortable. But maybe because I am one of those who is paranoid when it comes to privacy issues. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I respect that. Essjay is quite anonymous, and he's my best wikifriend... I wouldn't just jump from person to person checking their IP. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 01:57, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Taking a look at Recently created bureaucrats, successful candidates have edited for about 18 months and were admins for nearly a year. Candidates below these thresholds usually have a fair amount of opposition. Carbonite | Talk 02:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I would take that statistic with a grain of salt. Of the nine that were rejected, only Linuxbeak, and to a lesser extent Andrevan, failed primarily because of their lack experience. Most of the others already had enough experience before going through nomination process. Some were rejected because of prior conflicts, and some like Michael Hardy and Rdsmith4 were rejected solely because many users did not think we needed more bureaucrats at that time. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:26, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I was actually looking at the matter from the other angle; Basically, what is the profile of a successful candidate? Even candidates that meet or exceed the thresholds I described may still fail the RfB. However, not meeting the threshold does have a strong correlation with rejection (of course, correlation does not imply causation). Carbonite | Talk 02:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Would it be crazy to judge by merits instead of by guidelines like edit count and account age? It doesn't seem suitable to oppose me, unless you really don't trust me, though neutral would be understandable. I think opposes should only happen if you think I'll promote random people and if you think I don't know consensus. But that's my opinion, and you of course all have yours. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 02:39, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, I think your experience and tenure is part of your merits. You've done a lot in your short period of time here, but you're still far short of what a successful candidate normally has. Also, to be quite honest, I don't think that challenging oppose voters is really helping your chances too much. It's not at the GordonWatts level, but sometimes you just have to accept that people are going to want you to put in a bit more time before giving you a promotion. As for your "joke" edit summary, I don't think it's that big of a deal, but I would have assumed that after your last joke, you would have been slightly more aware of how your actions may be viewed. In my opinion, bureaucrats should have virtually "bulletproof" credentials. You're well on your way; I just don't think you're there yet. Happy editing... Carbonite | Talk 02:50, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If I see a problem, I'll try to argue with it. At least I'm doing it in the comments section, and not in the middle of the oppose section. And as for that on wheels thing, I think its safe to say that the consensus was it was a harmless joke, which didn't hurt the wiki in any way. And as I said about the edit summary, the obnoxious caps were to show people at RC and anyone looking over the history of RfA, as bureaucratship is a big deal, and I'd like maximum community participation, as it'd be terrible to promote me if I just had 5 supports to 0 opposes, how can five people decide what the community wants? R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 03:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Please don't misunderstand, I'm don't think you did anything wrong with challenging oppose votes, the "wheels thing" or the edit summary. My point is that they all could have been handled in a more mature way. One response to an oppose vote is fine; saying "It doesn't seem suitable to oppose me..." is a bit too aggressive. Users are allowed to have their own standards for bureaucrats and mine are right in line with historical standards. As for the "jokes", even they don't actually harm anything, they can be disruptive. The "on wheels" incident was evidence that the community often views jokes in a negative light. The edit summary wasn't harmful or really even disruptive, but it's not what I like to see in a candidate (I may be in the minority on this). A simple edit summary such as "nominate myself for bureaucratship" would have served the purpose just as well and wouldn't have given the impression that you were treating this like a popularity contest. I know that's not actually the case, but edit summaries are permanent, and is that one you really want stored forever? In summary, I really do think you're doing a remarkable job, and in six months or so, I'd almost certainly support you (if this RfB doesn't suceed). Carbonite | Talk 03:19, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually here's my biggest problem with your oppose: where you say 'as a 15 year old trying to prove himself mature enough'. I just recently wrote an essay on teenage wikipedians and how I'm rather tired of the condescending tones toward teenagers just for their age. (May I recommend reading that (possibly pov) essay?) -- R e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 03:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I had already read your essay before voting. It was good reading. It makes it clear that you realize there's a mostly undeserved bias against teenage editors here. That's why I was diappointed in your joking attitude to listing this RfB. When you act like you're not serious, people may not take you seriously. Personally, I couldn't less about the ages of admins, bureaucrats or arbitrators. But I do care about how old they act. Carbonite | Talk 03:26, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Wow, I'm seeing stars... Sorry for that then. I often see Raul654 joking on the main page with stuff like OHNOES!! MENSTRUATION IS TODAY'S FEATURED ARTICLE! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!111!!11shift!! Anyways, thanks for the essay compliment, and now that I know your tone was misunderstood by me, I'm fine. Half the problems at wikipedia seem to be tone misunderstanding... Anyways, cheers Carbonite. I don't really expect this RfB to pass, the real RfB would be in April. But if this one does pass, then I'll be the happiest wikipedian you've ever seen. Thanks for telling me what your intent was. Happy editing. R  e  dwolf24  (talk—How's my driving?) 03:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * In re: "to help replace retired bureaucrats as Cecropia." Yeah, it was Redwolf who "retired" mehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bureaucrats&diff=prev&oldid=25330579. ;-) An honest mistake, but I'm pissed he didn't see to it that I got a gold watch. :D -- Remembering Mark Twain, I remain, Cecropia | explains it all ® 05:12, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?
 * A. Yup, read it, including the bureaucrat percentile vs. admin percentile. I'd prefer 80% myself, but I wouldn't close an RfA as no consensus if there was anything less. Anyways, why don't these questions have anything about changing username?
 * 2. How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?
 * A. Establish a consensus, talk with my fellow bureaucrats, worst come to worst there'd be a revote (as per Requests for adminship/Weyes2a.)
 * 3. Wikipedians expect Bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?
 * A. Well, I believe I've ran AfD/VfD just fine. I know of all the policies, or so I like to think. And as one can see, I'm very active in interaction with other users. I don't believe I've ever been unfair, although, once again to be NPOV, Xiong and Tern may not agree with that.

Now that you've read the answers, go and vote! :P R  e  dwolf24  (talk) 01:14, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Nathaniel Mountain Wildlife Management Area

Nathaniel Mountain Wildlife Management Area is located on 10675 acre south of Romney in Hampshire County, West Virginia. The wildlife management area's principle access road is off Grassy Lick Road (County Route 10). Nathaniel Mountain is owned by the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources (WVDNR), and is one of West Virginia's largest wildlife management areas. The WMA was expanded in November 2003 after the WVDNR purchased 1800 acre from the MeadWestvaco Corporation.

Nathaniel Mountain WMA is made up of three major mountains: Nathaniel Mountain (2739 ft), Piney Mountain (2618 ft), and South Branch Mountain (3,028 ft). The WMA's forests are primarily dominated by mature species of oak, hickory, and Virginia pine. White-tailed deer, turkey, grouse, squirrel, and black bears are available for hunting.

Mill Run, a steep mountain stream that meanders through a seven-mile (11 km) course to join the South Branch Potomac River, is also located in the Nathaniel Mountain WMA.


text:
Talk:Kugersput

Articles for Deletion debate
This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash talk 00:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Kugersput


text:
Guideline execution engine

A guideline execution engine is a computer program which can interpret a clinical guideline represented in a computerized format and perform actions towards the user of an electronic medical record.

A guideline execution engine needs to communicate with a host clinical information system. Virtual Medical Record (vMR) is one possible interface which can be used.

The engine's main function is to manage instances of executed guidelines of individual patients.

Architecture
The following modules are generally needed for any engine:

 * interface to clinical information system
 * new guidelines loading module
 * guideline interpreter module
 * clinical events parser
 * alert/recommendations dispatch

Guideline Interchange Format
The Guideline Interchange Format (GLIF) is a computer representation format for clinical guidelines. Represented guidelines can be executed using a guideline execution engine.

The format has several versions as it has been improved. In 2003 GLIF3 was introduced.

Use of third party workflow engine as a guideline execution engine
Some commercial electronic health record systems use a workflow engine to execute clinical guidelines. RetroGuide and HealthFlow are examples of such an approach.

title: Guideline execution engine


text:
Talk:Cromer Academy

Victuallers 16:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion debate
This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash talk 00:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Comments moved from main article
Whoever keeps writing the abusive comments about staff at this school is commenting a serious offence. A prosecution will almost certainly follow if the matter persists. The comments are malicious, unfounded ad insulting to the school as a whole. original comment was posted on main article page by 81.108.164.251 @ 06:53, 17 February 2006

Samir ∙ TC  10:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

adding to article
I was considering whether to include a paragraph on the'Party On the Park' which has become one of the many distinguishing features of this school. Thoughts? 86.154.81.6 17:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC)joe bloggs

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://cromeracademy.org.uk/ https://www.inspirationtrust.org/cromeracademy/academy-life/arts-and-culture. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 13:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cromer Academy


text:
Aurelio González (footballer)

Aurelio Ramón González Benítez (25 September 1905 – 9 July 1997) was a Paraguayan football player and coach.

González is one of the greatest football players of Paraguay, considered by many as the second best player behind Arsenio Erico. He started his career in Sportivo Luqueño and then moved to Olimpia of Asunción where he spent the rest of his career winning several championships, most notably the three consecutive national championships obtained by Olimpia in 1927, 1928 and 1929.

In the early 1930s he rejected an offer worth millions from San Lorenzo de Almagro of Argentina in order to fight for his country, Paraguay, in the Chaco War. He also was a vital player of the Paraguay national team scoring several goals in the 1920s and 1930s, and participated at the 1930 World Cup.

As a coach, he led Olimpia of Asunción to numerous championships and to the first Copa Libertadores final in 1960. He also coached the Paraguay national team in the 1958 World Cup.

title: Aurelio González (footballer)


text: Category:Politics of Jordan

title: Category:Politics of Jordan


text:
Andrew Turnbull (colonist)

Andrew Turnbull (1718 – March 13, 1792) was a Scottish physician and diplomat who served as the British consul at Smyrna, Ottoman Empire. In 1768, he founded the colony of New Smyrna, Florida, named in honor of his wife's birthplace, the ancient Greek city of Smyrna on the Aegean coast of Anatolia. Turnbull was married to Gracia Dura Bin (some sources give her name as Maria Gracia Rubini), the daughter of a Greek merchant from Smyrna. His colony was located in the province of British East Florida, and encompassed some 101,400 acres (410 km$2$); it was nearly three times the size of the colony at Jamestown.

In partnership with Sir William Duncan he secured a grant of 40,000 acres (160 km$2$) of land on the east coast of the peninsula, with the requirement from the British government that it be settled within 10 years in the proportion of one person for every 100 acre. In 1765 he sailed to St. Augustine, the capital of the province, and secured the grant from Governor James Grant. The land was located at what is now New Smyrna Beach about 62 mi south of St. Augustine. Turnbull then returned to England, secured financing for his forthcoming venture through bounties from the government and the Board of Trade, and subsequently sailed for the Mediterranean to find colonists "for a Tract of Land in East Florida on which I might settle a small Colony of Greeks," as Turnbull explained in a letter to Lord Shelburne.

One of Turnbull's prospective partners in the venture was Francis Levett, an English factor working in Livorno for the Levant Company. From a powerful English mercantile family with extensive trading connections, Levett hoped to use his influence in the Levant to supply Greek laborers to Turnbull's new colony. Levett then left London, where he had relocated, and settled in British East Florida, where he was granted a 10000 acre plantation by Governor Grant. His collaboration with Turnbull apparently came to naught.

In June 1767, Turnbull arrived with his ships in the Mediterranean, where he visited Mahon, Menorca; Livorno, Italy; Smyrna, Asia Minor; Melos, Mani, Koroni, Methoni in Greece; Crete; Santorini; and Corsica. He encountered opposition from French, Italian, and Turkish authorities, who did not want to see their subjects leave, but after persistent efforts, he finally rounded up over 1,400 colonists, the majority from Menorca, and left for his new colony in East Florida.

Turnbull's settlers eventually succeeded in producing crops of high quality indigo, hemp and sugarcane for making rum, but the plantation suffered major losses due to insect-borne diseases and Native American raids. Meanwhile, tensions grew between Turnbull and the colonists because of his neglect and mistreatment by his overseers. The remaining colonists marched north in 1777 to St. Augustine along the King's Road to complain of this mistreatment to Governor Patrick Tonyn, and permanently abandoned New Smyrna when he offered them sanctuary. In 1783 Florida was returned to the Spanish, and Turnbull left his plantation to retire in Charleston, South Carolina.

title: Andrew Turnbull (colonist)


text: File:Jeepers Creepers (2001 film) poster.jpg


text: File:ROTR Cyborg Sentry.png

title: File:ROTR Cyborg Sentry.png


text: Category:Religion in Jordan

title: Category:Religion in Jordan


text: Category:Society of Jordan

title: Category:Society of Jordan


text:
Talk:Air Base K–8 Center

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:K-12 education in the United States which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Air Base K–8 Center


text:
Leah Ayres

Leah Ayres Kalish (born Leah Simpson; May 28, 1957) is an American former actress, best known for her role as Janice Kent in the martial arts sports action film Bloodsport and as Valerie Bryson on the daytime serial The Edge of Night. Kalish is a Master Yoga Teacher, Family Constellations practitioner, and coauthor of children's books.

Education
Kalish attended both Tufts University and New York University, earning a degree in dance from NYU. Ayres also earned an M.A. in human development from Pacific Oaks College in Pasadena, California in 1996.

Certifications
Kalish is a certified family constellations facilitator, embodied language processing (embodiment process) practitioner, and Yoga Alliance Registered Master Yoga Teacher. She is a proponent of socio-emotional education and teaching integrated yoga and mindfulness in schools. She and her husband Bruce Kalish are founders of a family constellations and inherited family trauma facilitation practice based in Los Angeles.

Television
Her first major role was as Valerie Bryson on the daytime serial The Edge of Night in the early 1980s. In 1984, she starred in Velvet, an ABC/Aaron Spelling television movie opposite Sheree J. Wilson, Shari Belafonte, and Mary Margaret Humes. In primetime, she co-starred as Linda Bowman on the abbreviated third season of ABC's 9 to 5. She also played Jill Schrader on the HBO original comedy 1st & Ten in 1986-87.

In 1990, she replaced Maureen McCormick in the role of Marcia Brady on the short-lived series The Bradys. She also made guest appearances on such series as Hotel, The Love Boat, Fantasy Island, Married... with Children, and Who's the Boss?. In 1995, she had a recurring role as Tara Flynn on three episodes of Walker, Texas Ranger.

Film
Ayres starred in Bloodsport (1988) alongside Jean-Claude Van Damme and played Michelle in the 1981 film The Burning. She appeared in Eddie Macon's Run (1983). She played the diner waitress in the Meatloaf video for "More Than You Deserve".

title: Leah Ayres


text:
Dana Hills High School

Dana Hills High School is a high school in Dana Point, California opened in 1973. The school's enrollment of roughly 2,000 students is drawn from the nearby communities of Laguna Niguel, Dana Point, Capistrano Beach, and San Juan Capistrano.

When Dana Hills was built in 1972–73, the area was an unincorporated area of Orange County. The school was named for its hilltop location over the unincorporated village of Dana Point, as well as the tip of the hill projecting south into the Pacific Ocean as the Dana Point headland. The school later became a part of the City of Dana Point, when the city was incorporated in 1989.

Dana Hills now has over 155839 sqft in permanent buildings. The principal is Dr. Brad Baker.

STAR Testing
Dana Hills' Academic Performance Index (API) for the year of 2007 was 824.

Advanced Placement
Dana Hills offers a wide array of Advanced Placement (AP) classes. These AP classes include Calculus AB, Calculus BC, Statistics, Biology, Chemistry, Environmental Science, Literature, Language and Composition, Music Theory, Art History, Psychology, Spanish IV, French IV, European History, United States History, World History, Government/Politics, and Computer Science A. All AP classes offer a “grade bump” making a 5.0 GPA possible in that class exclusively.

Newspaper
The Dana Hills newspaper, originally called the Dolphin Dispatch from 1973 to 1992, now simply known as The Paper (stylized as "THE PAPER"), is produced by a staff of roughly 20 students. Roughly 2-3 newspapers are produced each school year. It features five sections: news, feature, opinion, entertainment, and sports.

In May 2019, the newspaper went digital with a new website (www.dhhsthepaper.com) created by a staff member.

HMO
Dana Hills has a junior medical program, the Health and Medical Occupations Academy. The academy is for those who wish to study or pursue a career in medicine, as it prepares students for higher education in the medical field. Participants are involved in field trips, hospital duties, and view medical procedures as they are performed.

SOCSA
The South Orange County School of the Arts (SOCSA), a part of Dana Hills High School, is a visual and performing arts academy for students within the Capistrano Unified School District. Conceived in 1989 by a group of parents, teachers and administrators, the academy was chartered by the District on November 20, 1995. The pilot program at Dana Hills High School was launched in the Spring semester of 1996.

In October 2000, the SOCSA Foundation was formed to raise funds to support the SOCSA Academy. In the fall of 2015, the Friends of SOCSA was formed as a replacement non-profit to support the SOCSA Academy.

SOCSA website

Marine Ecology Program
One of Dana Hills' science courses is the Marine Ecology program, which offers a full year of marine science covering both the physical and biological sciences of the ocean and how they work together to form a working Ecosystem. Examples of some of the subjects taught during the class include plate tectonics, waves and tides, ocean currents, sand, algae, plankton, marine mammals, echinoderms, and fish. One of the most well-known traditions of the class is the annual Baja field study. In this field study, students, parents, teachers, and past alumni of the class travel down to Baja, California for a week, usually in May. The purpose of this field study is to apply what the students have learned that year in the class and see it in its natural environment, outside of a conventional laboratory setting. The Baja field study is unique only to that of Dana Hills, and essentially offered nowhere else in the United States.

Notable alumni

 * Nicole Brown Simpson, former wife of Heisman Trophy winner/ex-NFL player and actor O. J. Simpson
 * Erik Apple, professional MMA fighter and from the movie Warrior (2011), formerly competing in Strikeforce (mixed martial arts)
 * Dana Brown, filmmaker
 * Melinda Clarke of The O.C.
 * Jose Cortez, center for Greek Team Athens 2003–2009
 * Scott Covington, NFL quarterback for the St. Louis Rams and Cincinnati Bengals
 * Hans Crouse, Major League Baseball pitcher for the Philadelphia Phillies
 * Anthony Cumia, one half of the former Opie and Anthony radio show and host of The Anthony Cumia Show on Compound Media.
 * Charlotte Drury, national and international champion trampolinist, Olympic Alternate (Tokyo 2020)
 * Jennifer Kessy, Class of ‘94, professional volleyball player, silver medalist 2012 London Olympics
 * Ian McCall, wrestler; professional mixed martial artist, retired UFC Flyweight contender
 * Fredy Montero professional soccer player
 * Kevin Page of Something Corporate
 * Brian Ireland of Something Corporate
 * Andrew McMahon, lead singer of Jack's Mannequin, Something Corporate, and Andrew McMahon In the Wilderness
 * Josiah Johnson, founding member and former vocalist, guitarist, percussionist of The Head and the Heart
 * Seth Etherton, Major League Baseball pitcher for the Anaheim Angels and Cincinnati Reds
 * Bao Quach, wrestler; professional MMA fighter
 * Tanner Scheppers, MLB pitcher for Texas Rangers
 * Justin South of Augustana
 * Kyle Straka of The Growlers
 * Mimi Walters, U.S. Congresswoman
 * Luke Williams (2015), baseball player for the San Francisco Giants of Major League Baseball
 * Pat O'Connell, professional surfer, star of The Endless Summer II
 * Marisa Pinson, successful writer and a podcast host
 * Lloyd Bryan Molander Adams Lloyd Bryan Molander Adams, Producer, Director, and Founder of the Dana Point Films Festival

title: Dana Hills High School


text:
User talk:83.138.136.92

Proposed deletion of Downlode

The article Downlode has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * nn comic

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 09:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:83.138.136.92


text:
Nitro (band)

Nitro was an American heavy metal band from Hollywood, California. Formed in 1988, the group originally featured vocalist Jim Gillette, guitarist Michael Angelo Batio, bassist T. J. Racer and drummer Bobby Rock. Nitro released its debut album O.F.R. in 1989, which reached number 140 on the US Billboard 200. Rock was replaced by K. C. Comet for the album's tour and Racer would leave the band thereafter. Nitro II: H.W.D.W.S., released in 1992, featured Ralph Carter on bass and Johnny Thunder on drums. The group broke up in 1993, with a number of previously unreleased demo recordings issued on the 1999 album Gunnin' for Glory.

In late 2016, it was announced that Gillette and Batio had reformed the band, with Lamb of God drummer Chris Adler added to the group's lineup. Plans were made to record a third album – which would have been the band's first full-length studio album since 1992 – with Victor Wooten on bass and Kane Churko producing. Matt DeVries performed in place of Wooten at live shows. In 2017, "It Won't Die" was released as the lead single from the album. However, Batio announced in May 2019 that the band had once again split up, but added that some of the material from the abandoned third album would surface on his next solo release.

1987–1993: Formation and first two releases
In 1987, vocalist Jim Gillette released his debut solo album Proud to Be Loud, which featured contributions from guitarist Michael Angelo Batio and bassist T. J. Racer, the three of whom would later go on to form Nitro. Gillette and Batio had initially met at a beach party, while Racer was introduced to the singer as an attendee of one of his instructional vocal courses. Former Vinnie Vincent Invasion drummer Bobby Rock joined the band shortly thereafter. Speaking about joining the band, Rock recalled that Gillette and Batio recruited him by explaining that they "wanted to record the most over-the-top, in-your-face metal record ever". Nitro signed with Rhino Entertainment record label Rampage Records after their first show, at which Gillette "reportedly shattered three wine glasses with his voice".

Gillette, Batio, Racer and Rock recorded the first Nitro album at Front Page Productions in Costa Mesa, California with producer and engineer Charlie Watts. The album was released in 1989 and spent nine weeks on the US Billboard 200, peaking at number 140. Shortly after the recording of the album, Rock left Nitro to join Nelson, with K. C. Comet replacing him for the album's promotional concert tour (he also appeared in the music videos for the singles "Freight Train" and "Long Way from Home"). After the tour, Comet was replaced by Johnny Thunder while Ralph Carter was brought in after Racer's departure. The band released its second album Nitro II: H.W.D.W.S. in 1992, which featured a cover version of Ted Nugent's "Cat Scratch Fever" as its sole single, before breaking up the following year.

After Nitro's breakup, a number of previously unreleased demo recordings were issued on the compilation Gunnin' for Glory, released on Batio's record label M.A.C.E. Music in 1999. In the subsequent years, there were occasional comments from Gillette and Batio hinting at a potential reformation of the band. In 2008, when asked at Rocklahoma festival about the possibility of a return for the group, Gillette commented that "It would be great to do; maybe next year", adding that "It would take about six months to get back to where I would like it to be vocally." However, Batio responded later in the year by revealing that he did not want to reform the band as Gillette was only interested in writing new material, not performing the band's old songs, which the guitarist explained would "not be the same".

2016–2019: Return and cancelled third album
On November 30, 2016, it was announced that Gillette and Batio were set to reform Nitro with then-Lamb of God drummer Chris Adler. Speaking about the potential style of the band's new material, Adler commented that "I'm blown away by the modern sound and groove in the material. The chaos has been harnessed and it's incredibly heavy." The trio began recording for a new album the following month with engineer Josh Wilbur. Victor Wooten was later enlisted as the bassist for the recording of the album, followed by producer and songwriter Kane Churko. Batio commented on the direction of the group's new recordings in February 2017, suggesting that it would feature more death metal than the glam for which the band was previously known, owing to Gillette's changed vocal style. "It Won't Die" was released as the band's first new song since 1999 on July 25. In September, the reunited band performed its first string of concerts on an Indian tour in September 2017, with Matt DeVries joining as the touring bassist.

In a May 2019 interview, Batio announced that Nitro had once again broken up. When asked about the status of the band's slated third album, he said, "It's gone ... we just can't go back ... after we did a few songs, we did a tour together, we all realized". The guitarist later added, "I'm best friends with Jim Gillette – we're like brothers. We never had an argument, even back in the old days", as well as assuring fans that some of the material recorded with Adler and Wooten would surface on his next solo release, due later in the year.

Members
Former members
 * Jim Gillette – vocals (1988–1993, 2016–2019)
 * Michael Angelo Batio – guitars, keyboards, backing vocals (1988–1993, 2016–2019)
 * T. J. Racer – bass (1988–1991)
 * Bobby Rock – drums (1988–1989)
 * K. C. Comet – drums (1989–1991)
 * Ralph Carter – bass, backing vocals (1991–1993)
 * Johnny Thunder – drums (1991–1993)
 * Chris Adler – drums (2016–2019)
 * Matt DeVries – bass (2017–2019)

Guests
 * Markus Mueller - drums (1992) (Died: 1995)
 * Victor Wooten – bass (2017)

Discography
Studio albums Compilations Singles Music videos
 * O.F.R. (1989)
 * Nitro II: H.W.D.W.S. (1992)
 * Gunnin' for Glory (1999)
 * "Freight Train" (1989)
 * "Long Way from Home" (1989)
 * "Cat Scratch Fever" (1992)
 * "Johnny Died on Christmas" (1992)
 * "It Won't Die" (2017)
 * "Freight Train" (1989)
 * "Long Way from Home" (1989)
 * "Johnny Died on Christmas" (1992)
 * "Cat Scratch Fever" (1992)
 * "Boyz Will B Boyz" (1993) (unreleased)

title: Nitro (band)


text: Category:Foreign relations of Jordan

title: Category:Foreign relations of Jordan


text: Category:Government of Jordan

title: Category:Government of Jordan


text:
Akatsi

Akatsi is a small town and is the capital of Akatsi South District, a district in the Volta Region of Ghana.

Economy
Economic activities in Akatsi are mainly Subsistence agriculture coupled with vibrant buying and selling. Smuggling of clothing from Lomé in Togo through Aflao (the south-eastern border town of Ghana) to Accra. The trans-West Africa highway linking Lomé to Accra through Akatsi also aids an active male dominated transportation business in Akatsi.

Demographics
The inhabitants of Akatsi are Avenor Ewes and the main language of any social and economic interaction is Ewe. The Ewe settled in the area after the exodus of Ewe tribe from Notsie in Togo to this area in the seventeenth century.

Education
Akatsi is home to the teacher training educational institution Akatsi College of Education, which includes over 700 students and has achieved a good reputation in the area for educating tutors.

title: Akatsi


text: Category:Buildings and structures in Jordan


text:
Ajumako

Ajumako is a town in Ghana. It is the capital of Ajumako-Enyan-Esiam district. It is famous for being the birthplace of Ottobah Cugoano, an abolitionist of the 18th century.

Facts of Interest
The University of Education, Winneba (Ajumako Campus) is situated there.

The natives are Fante except the people of Breman Essiam who trace their lineage to Breman, near Kumasi. The main occupation of the people is farming with emerging markets at Breman Essiam and Ajumako. The current Member of parliament of the district is Cassiel Ato Forson.

title: Ajumako


text:
Talk:Tooheys Old

Untitled
"It is notable by virtue of the fact that it's one of the few Australian mass produced beers which is even remotely palatable. It is therefore one of the only two such beers to earn a mention in |The Great Beer Guide.  The other is Dogbolter."

-changed this POV section to one more NPOV Cfitzart 01:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here. Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories, but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns, please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 05:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Has or is this beer imported to USA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.64.185.60 (talk) 11:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Style?
I tried this brew circa 1975, and it was a Porter ... a mild stout. The brew now tastes nothing like this. It is mostly light malt, possibly with some wheat, and a small dollop of coffee style black malt, and barely detectable hops. A weak copy of Bavarian Dunkel.

History

During the 1960's and 1970's this beer was available only in the Newcastle/Hunter Valley region. Most pubs in the area were tied to either the Tooheys or Tooths brewers both of which produced two main beers. Tooheys Old was called 'black' when being ordered and Tooheys New, a much lighter beer, was called 'white'. This conventions distinguished the Tooheys beers from the Tooths brands which were conventionally called 'new' and 'old'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.19.251 (talk) 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Tooheys Old


text:
Peter Fulton

Peter Gordon Fulton (born 1 February 1979) is a former New Zealand international cricketer who played for Canterbury at domestic level. He comes from a well recognised cricketing family with his uncle Roddy Fulton playing and captaining both Canterbury, Northern Districts, and New Zealand A from 1972 to 1985. He retired from first-class cricket in April 2017.

Domestic career
Fulton's career highlights include scoring 301 not out against Auckland at the Hagley Oval in Christchurch over 11/12 March 2003, which is the highest maiden first-class century by any New Zealand batsman. Another career highlight was when he scored 112 in an ODI against Sri Lanka in Napier, New Zealand, on 8 January 2006. In the same series he also scored two half-centuries and was NZs top-scorer.

In the final of the 2016–17 Ford Trophy, Fulton scored the fastest century in a List A cricket match in New Zealand.

International career
In March 2006, he made his Test debut against the West Indies.

In March 2013 he made his first International Test century playing against England, and scored his second Test hundred in the match's second innings. In doing so he became the fourth New Zealander to score a hundred in both innings of a Test match.

title: Peter Fulton