text:
Talk:Taxon

German article
The German article on this topic is so much more complete - to the point it was a past featured article. I would love to see some nice bilingual person translate some of the information on the German page into English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psu256 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

 * This might be a good idea if the German system of classification was even vaguely similar to the English system. I can't read German all that well, but the taxonomy is much different than anything I've ever read in English, starting with the fact that it doesn't have the same order of taxons. I'm sure there is useful material in the German articles, but adapting it to English could be a challenge. Fuzzform 00:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Mnemonics
The article really could do with some definition of how the kingdoms are seperated. This is what I was looking for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.216.7.211 (talk) 15:47, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

 * It might be worth including the mnemonic "King Philip Came Over From Germany Stoned", which represents Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzform (talk • contribs) 00:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I also remember King Phillip Choked On Fresh Green Spinach from my high school biology days. Rpachico 18:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * A mnemonic I have never forgoten is 'Keep Penis Clean Or Forget Good Sex'. I won't put that in the main article, however. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.132.8 (talk) 11:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not to split hairs, but silk? Who the heck would ever play chess on silk? that makes zero sense and therefore is harder to remember.
 * Kings Play Chess On Funny Green Squares makes more of a mental image (at least for the sane).169.132.18.249 (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Taxxon
I can't help but notice how similar the word "Taxon" is to "Taxxon". (A Taxxon is a fictional alien species in the Animorphs books.) An accidental typo of one letter could send someone elsewhere! dogman15 01:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

First use
At this point, the article states here that the term was introduced for animal groups in 1926 by Adolf Bernhard Meyer. It is of course possible that it took his heirs 15 years before they had this part of his work published posthumously, but as I cannot find any other reference so far as to where the term was published, by whom, and when, my first guess is that someone did not do his homework when he made a statement to this effect in the article. A reliable source is needed here, perhaps accompanied by a link to the first place of publication. Wiki klaas   16:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Just to make things easier: the addition of the paragraph was done here. The name of the biologist was originally cited as "Adolf Meyer". Because someone noticed that Adolf Meyer is a disambiguation page, the name was then changed into "Adolf Bernard Meyer" (here), probably for no other reason than that this is the only Adolf Meyer biologist about whom this Wikipedia has an article. The added paragraph was quite literally taken from this page in Taxonomy of Angiosperms by V.N. Naik. In the reference list of that work, A. Meyer is cited as the author of "Logik der Morphologie im Rahmen einer Logik der gesamten Biologie", Leipzig, 1926 (never mind the spelling errors). This was a work authored by Adolf Meyer-Abich (1893-1971), science historian and theoretical biologist. That would make sense. Now someone with access to that work just has to check whether the term was indeed introduced in that book, or find another authoritative source that backs this up.  Wiki  klaas   18:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 * This article backs up the information as you have reconstructed it. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 03:40, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

An excellent sentence too compact
Although preceded by Linnaeus's system in Systema Naturae (10th edition, 1758) and unpublished work by Bernard and Antoine Laurent de Jussieu, the notion of a unit-based "natural system" of biological classification was first made widely available in 1805 through the publication, as the introduction to the third edition of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck's Flore françoise, of Augustin Pyramus de Candolle's Principes élémentaires de botanique, an exposition of a system for the "natural classification" of plants.

This is an ideal scholarly sentence in many respects, and almost a work of art in compact register.

It just isn't right for Wikipedia, and the attention span of the average reader.

 * 20-word preamble packed with Latin, French, and vintage book lore
 * subject: notion
 * passive, compound main verb: was made available
 * SV sentence stem: the notion was made available
 * 1st passive main-verb embedded modifier: was first made
 * 2nd passive main-verb embedded modifier: made widely available
 * four prepositional refinements: of a unit-based "natural system" of biological classification through the publication of Principes élémentaires de botanique — with scare quotes around "natural" and a big mouthful of French (rendered in foreign title caps)
 * appositive qualifier also larded with prepositions (and more French, and more book lore): as the introduction to the third edition of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck's Flore françoise
 * abstract explanatory afterthought: [this work being] an exposition of a system for the "natural classification" of plants — with "natural" scarequod again

Sure, this is an eighth-grade reading level: but only in Starfleet Academy. — MaxEnt 21:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Agree! Shorter sentences, straightforward words/and or include definitions or link. Peacedance (talk) 23:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Clarification Request
Request for clarification on unit, but really the entire first paragraph and perhaps lead needs a rewrite. – A unit of *what*? – What are these units based on? (earlier physical attributes, later evolution/genomics?) – "Population" sounds geographical. Sometimes this is the case, but not always – is another more generic word better? – There is no hint here that a taxon can be of different levels. How about a little context, very briefly for the lead, how did they get started, why are they continued? There are no examples to even give the reader a *hint*.

I am a sociologist and would like to better understand the basics of taxonomy, cladistics, etc., but I really can't with the way that the articles are at this point. The introductions, at least, need to be written while imagining that the audience is a **general reader knows nothing about the topic**. That doesn't mean it can't be stuffed with fascinating information, but it does mean that terms should be defined, context and brief examples provided so the reader knows what the heck you are talking about. That also doesn't mean that the article can't get into more sophisticated detail later in the article.

I know more about this than I am implying, and could try to rewrite it myself, but I don't know enough to ensure that I am not making subtle mistakes that are misleading.

But help out the rest of us in the lead! Please! Peacedance (talk) 23:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Classification image spelling error
The animal classification image shows nine things, while the description says 'eight'. Fix the spelling error to make sure that it matches. 111.88.15.221 (talk) 17:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Taxon
Le plus important  serait le taxon lazare  un sous claque  comme   la Queen. Et mickeal jackson  je nais pas vue   et le super classe. Order classe. Reptilien mais seulement des lignéa   sang pure. Mon ami  est sous classe mais lazare   revenue 2005. . Il est différent. Que vous être. Oui je suis content. . 70.55.128.180 (talk) 21:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Taxon


text:
User:AngelovdS

I'm just another boring Dutchie with a little bit of spare time, who likes to help others out. For information on me, you could check out my MSN space at []. In short: I'm a student of Computer Science, eigth year now (2005), I like all kinds of weird music (especially Focus, Simon & Grafunkel, Jefferson Airplane, Metallica, Moody Blues,...), and, well, am just kind of weird myself.

If you have anything to tell me, leave it on my Talk page or send me an email.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User:AngelovdS


text: User talk:81.79.185.51

title: User talk:81.79.185.51


text:
Talk:2002 Pacific hurricane season

Todo/GA
— jdorje (talk) 04:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I think being a GA is basically the equivalent of A-class on our assessment scale, so it should be discussed on the wikiproject page too (I have done so above).
 * The season summary section is too short - basically the same length as the intro. This should either be folded into the intro or expanded.
 * Each storm's section should have length proportional to that storm's notability (regardless of any daughter articles that cover the storm). The article violates this principle in that Fausto has the longest section by far, while Kenna has the shortest.

GA nom has failed
The Good article nomination for has failed for the following reason:

 * (References are too jargon-filled WP:CITE; article reads as more of a list than a well-written atricle.) - Davodd 15:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Ele & Huko
The storm tracks for Hurricanes "Ele" and "Huko" should really include the track while west of 180 meridian. Hurricanes "John" and "Li" in 1994 had full tracks including while west of the dateline, so why not these storms? RaNdOm26 18:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The problem was that the NHC best track data included the complete tracks for John and Li. However, only the Central Pacific part of Ele and Huko is in the NHC best tracks file. The continuation had to be collected from the JTWC. It's not perfect, as the JTWC tracked both storms in the EPac too, and had a slightly different track to the CPHC (for some bizarre reason).--Nilfanion (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1949to2007_epa.txt
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-05-25 03:38:59, 404 Not Found
 * In 1975 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 04:40:15, 404 Not Found
 * In 1991 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:56:22, 404 Not Found
 * In 2001 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 07:11:09, 404 Not Found
 * In 2006 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-26 02:11:28, 404 Not Found
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-06-04 18:43:32, 404 Not Found
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-06-04 21:55:32, 404 Not Found
 * In 1968 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 13:54:59, 404 Not Found
 * In 1975 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 21:14:29, 404 Not Found
 * In 1991 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 00:41:50, 404 Not Found
 * In 1994 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 02:35:20, 404 Not Found
 * In 2001 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-10 07:39:34, 404 Not Found
 * In 2002 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-11 04:44:21, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.climas.arizona.edu/forecasts/archive/aug2002/aug2002figs/19_tropicalstorms.html
 * In 2002 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 07:23:42, 404 Not Found
 * In 2002 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-11 04:44:44, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://wwww.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/ACOS-64CLEP?OpenDocument&rc=2&emid=ST-2002-0669-MEX
 * In 2002 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 07:23:44, 404 Not Found
 * In 2002 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-11 04:44:46, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 one external links on 2002 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/Epac_hurr/background_information.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922225446/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2002elida.shtml to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2002elida.shtml
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~450914
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2002sixteen-e.shtml
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/B3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2002 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/Epac_hurr/background_information.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastprofile.shtml
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~450914
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/67w70qET4?url=http://gcportal.guycarp.com/portal/extranet/popup/pdf/GCPub/tropcyc_02.pdf to http://gcportal.guycarp.com/portal/extranet/popup/pdf/GCPub/tropcyc_02.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2002sixteen-e.shtml
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/B3.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep12/ep122008.discus.001.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Split the timeline?
Since last month, I have requested the split of timeline in behalf of Modokai in the project discussion. However there is no discussion since last January, as such I opt to continue the discussion here.  Mario Jump  83!  08:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ,, : Consider giving your opinions regarding this one.  Mario Jump  83!  08:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Original discussion
In recent days, Modokai restored a merged article Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season without telling our project about splitting. When I first caught Modokai splitting that article yesterday I reverted their edits and cautioned them about what they are doing. They told me that they aren't doing anything wrong, and I replied to them that I was just telling them to not split these articles without seeking consensus first (as well as removing the caution to assume good faith). Now they're back at it, without even searching for consensus at all. As such I had to bring this up in here (and reverting their edits once again) to prevent further edit warring and as well as seeking for the consensus by myself. Should Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season be restored?  Mario Jump  83!  08:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * What was the rational of merging it? I'd like to see that first before making up my mind. Thanks, ~ Destroyeraa 🌀🇺🇸 17:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , see Talk:Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season.  Mario Jump  83!  23:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It looks like the timeline was never completed, which is why it was merged. If Modokai wishes to split the article and complete the timeline, I don't see the issue. There's already a well-established precedent for the creation of season timelines (provided that they are comprehensive), so I don't know if there needs to be a dedicated discussion for creating a timeline for this particular season. — Iune  talk  23:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, please disregard, I forgot that the timeline is already completed and present on the main season article. — Iune  talk  23:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Continued discussion

 * Oppose Timeline is quite short, and there is a reason why the featured article nomination was failed.  Mario Jump  83!  08:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose To split, the article must usually be approaching the upper limit of readable prose size. This article is not anywhere near there. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me!  11:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support - I'm a bit late... I would be willing to work on the timeline if we split it. It would only take a week or two for me to complete if we split. CodingCyclone!  🌀 📘 21:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose — Though I am a bit late... Per MarioJump83 and Chicdat. ~~ 🌀𝚂𝙲𝚂 𝙲𝙾𝚁𝙾𝙽𝙰🌀 18:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose I believe that the timeline is relatively short, and thus I believe that we should not split the timeline. Gummycow moomilk 16:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment It appears that timeline split is never going to happen. And this discussion has been dragging on for months, so the discussion is stale. Is there anyone to close this?  Mario  Jump  83!  08:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Hurricane Fausto (2002) into 2002 Pacific hurricane season
Fails WP:NWX; no land impact and no meteorological reason for the article. This could be summarized fairly easily within the season article. Noah, AATalk 14:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

 * Agree - Fausto is clearly unnotable, having no impacts or records to protect it from being merged to the main article. ''Flux55'' (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

 * The meteorological reasoning at the time was it's regeneration north of Hawaii fwiw. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

 * Support - the season article already covers most of the content in the Fausto article. I don't think the unique meteorological history is reason enough to keep the article. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Tropical Storm Julio (2002) into 2002 Pacific hurricane season
The season section is quite small and I don't feel there's much here that couldn't be said in the storm's section. Noah, AATalk 14:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

 * Support - nothing here that can't fit in the section. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Support merge – no impact, no wider coverage, and the pertinent details can be stated in the season article with ease. Drdpw (talk) 12:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:2002 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:2003 Pacific hurricane season

All storms
Shouldn't we have a short paragraph on all the storms? Aren't we supposed to have as much info as possible?Icelandic Hurricane 22:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

 * The article is incomplete. Yes, every storm should have its own paragraph and section. — jdorje (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Class
I've done a lot of work here what class do we think?--Nilfanion (talk) 02:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Nice. I've upped it to B. One thing that could be added is a season summary. Per the WMO, the 2003 season (AHS and EHS) had the most Mexico landfalls in a long time, so that could be worth adding. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm going to go through all the good seasonal articles looking for ideas. This article has the main bit of the topic, but all the extras are not there.--Nilfanion (talk) 11:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Mexican info
Can someone with a good knowledge of Spanish, look over the Mexican summary of the storms here? There is some decent impact/preparations info there that may be useful either here or in the daughter article(s)--Nilfanion (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Here is Noras badly translated summary - The day 1° of October of year 2003, in the evening, formed tropical depression no. 14-E of the season in the Northeastern Pacific Ocean, from a tropical disturbance; one began to 580 km to the Southwest of Manzanillo, Cabbage, with 45 maintained maximum winds of km/h, 65 gusts of wind of km/h, minimum pressure of 1007 hPa and displacement towards the West. At dawn of day 2, when it was to 620 km the Southwest of Manzanillo, Cabbage, the DT-14 was developed to the tropical storm “Nora”, with 65 maintained maximum winds of km/h, 85 gusts of wind of km/h and one minimum pressure of 1005 hPa. During the morning, “Nora” was reducing its speed of displacement reason why in afternoon of this day, it was to 655 km the Southwest of Manzanillo almost stationary, Cabbage, with 75 maximum winds maintained of km/h and 90 gusts of wind of km/h, same characteristics that conserved now until the dawn of the following day, when it recovered his movement, towards Nor-Northwest. During the day 3, “Nora” it maintained his desplazamieto towards the Northwest in parallel form to the coasts of the Pacific, while it acquired major forces, reason why in the last hours of the day, when it was to 665 km the Current Southwest of Cabo, Jal., intensified to hurricane, with 120 maximum winds maintained of km/h and 150 gusts of wind of km/h. In the morning of day 4, to 600 km to the South-Southwestern of Cabo San Lucas, “Nora” reached 165 maintained maximum winds of km/h with 205 gusts of wind of km/h, reaching category II of the scale of Saffir-Simpson intensity, same force with which the rest of this day stayed. When arriving at the zone of less warm waters of the West of the Peninsula of Baja California, the hurricane “Nora” began to lose force, and thus, in the evening of day 5, when its center was to 540 km to the Southwest of Cabo San Lucas, BCS., it was degraded to hurricane of category I, with 150 maintained maximum winds of km/h. While one approached the zone of cold waters of the West of the Peninsula of Baja California, “Nora” continued losing force, reason why in the morning of day 6, when it was to 485 km to the Southwest of Cabo San Lucas almost stationary, BCS., was debilitated to tropical storm, with 95 maintained maximum winds of km/h. The tropical storm “Nora” remained stationary, while it was debilitated more and more, getting to have 65 maximum winds of km/h at the end of the day, at the same time as it began to move with a course drastically modified, because now its trajectory aimed towards the coasts of the Northwest of Mexico, the previous thing due to the presence of a lowest part of valley in the layer mediates 850-250 hPa (Figure 1). At dawn of day 7, when it was to 410 km to the Southwest of Cabo San Lucas, BCS., with slow displacement towards the Northeast, “Nora” was degraded to tropical depression with 55 maximum winds maintained of km/h and 75 gusts of wind of km/h. During the rest of the day, the tropical depression “Nora” stayed with slow displacement, while it began to move erratically towards the East, course towards the coasts of the Pacific; at the end of the day, one was to 280 km to the South of Cabo San Lucas, BCS. The displacement towards the East was originated by the binary interaction with the tropical storm “located Olaf” to 860 km to This-South-east of the vortex of “Nora” (Figure 2). At dawn of day 8, the tropical depression “Nora” was debilitated even more and acquired 45 maintained maximum winds of km/h with 55 gusts of wind of km/h, while it continued his passage approaching the coasts of the state of Sinaloa. Shortly before the midnight, “Nora” touched earth to about 20 km South-South-east of the Cross population of Elota, Without., with 45 maximum winds maintained of km/h and 65 gusts of wind of km/h. After entering earth, “Nora” continued its passage on territory of the state of Sinaloa, reason why in first hours by day 9, it approached about 15 km to the Cross Northeast of Elota, Without. When advancing on earth, the tropical depression “Nora”, continued being debilitated and thus, in the first hours in the morning, when it was in earth to 80 km This-South-east de Culiacán, Without., had 35 maintained maximum winds of km/h with 45 gusts of wind of km/h, already in dissipation process. (I Like the cabbage translation!) Itfc+canes=me Talk   Contributions  16:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

naming hurricanes
When did we start naming hurricanes? Stuart hallam (talk) 00:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * It depends where you are in the world! See History of tropical cyclone naming. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Issues with FA status
This article was promoted to Featured article in 2006, and no longer meets Featured article standards. There are some unsourced sections, and two "Seasonal summary" sections. Many sections are very short, and overall it seems less comprehensive and fleshed-out compared to similar articles such as 2005 Atlantic hurricane season. CMD (talk) 03:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

CCI check
On the FAR talk page: Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/2003 Pacific hurricane season/archive1. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  03:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Hurricane Nora (2003) into 2003 Pacific hurricane season
Fails WP:NWX due to the minimal impact. Most of the impact mentioned isn't very notable and would be considered routine. This article could be easily summarized in the season section. Noah, AATalk 14:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

 * Weak oppose - If not for Nora's remnants producing flooding in Texas, I'd agree. ''Flux55'' (talk) 23:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It could likely be mentioned in the season section which still has room to expand. The evacuation part is already mentioned. That just leaves the road closures and tornado sentences for Texas. I don't see why a whole paragraph detailing the rest of the impact couldn't be included. The met part could likely be expanded a bit too. That would round out the coverage in the section. Noah, AATalk 00:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, seeing the state of this article, I'd agree. ''Flux55'' (talk) 00:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

 * Support as author, yea it could easily be merged. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak support This is an edge case, but seeing how most of the impacts are minor, it probably could fit if we trim it, which won’t be easy but is certainly possible. I also found no sustained coverage. 108.58.37.250 (talk) 22:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Support merge: storm had minimal impact and little evidence of notability. Drdpw (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

 * Support - The preparations and impact section isn't large enough given its minimal impacts. It isn't notable enough to warrant its own article, too. The storm's section in the season article could use some expanding anyway. ~  Sandy 14156   ( Talk ✉ )  20:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:2003 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:2000 Pacific hurricane season

Todo
More pictures, maybe? We could have track maps for each storm. Jdorje 19:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

B-class?
I think B-class is too much for this article. It looks like is in developement stage. It looks more for a Start-class. juan andrés 02:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

 * Completely agreed, it doesn't even have every storm. I bumped it down to start. Hurricanehink 11:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

 * And I lowered it to a stub. It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Upana-Chanchu
None of the NHC, CPHC, JTWC or JMA mention that these two systems were a continuation of one another. I have found the information in Gary Padgett's summary and tracks for July 2000. Judging from the fact that a number of meteorologists believe that these two storms were the same system, the information can and probably should be in the sections in both this article and the typhoon season. However, as officially they are two distinct systems, the section here should be "TS Upana" and the section in the typhoon season "TS Chanchu", with the text describing the connection.--Nilfanion (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * According to IBTrACS:
 * WP122000,           CHANCHU,     16,
 * 20000726, 1200,, LO,  6.4N, 178.0W,  20, 1007, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000726, 1800,, TD,  6.9N, 178.2W,  25, 1007, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000727, 0000,, TD,  7.5N, 178.6W,  25, 1007, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000727, 0600,, LO,  8.0N, 179.8W,  20, 1006, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000727, 1200,, LO,  8.4N, 179.0E,  20, 1005, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000727, 1800,, LO,  8.7N, 178.0E,  20, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000728, 0000,, TD,  9.4N, 177.2E,  25, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000728, 0600,, TD, 10.1N, 176.6E,  25, 1000, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000728, 1200,, TD, 10.8N, 176.4E,  30, 1000, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000728, 1800,, TS, 11.5N, 176.2E,  35,  998, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000729, 0000,, TS, 12.2N, 176.0E,  40,  996, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000729, 0600,, TS, 13.1N, 175.9E,  40,  998, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000729, 1200,, TS, 13.8N, 176.1E,  35, 1000, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000729, 1800,, TD, 14.7N, 177.1E,  30, 1002, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000730, 0000,, LO, 15.5N, 177.8E,  25, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000730, 0600,, LO, 16.6N, 178.6E,  20, 1008, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * ABC paulista (talk) 14:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.proteccioncivil.gob.mx/upLoad/Publicaciones/ised_2000.pdf
 * In 2000 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 07:00:45, 404
 * In 2000 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-10 05:44:07, 404

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php#2000
 * In 2000 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 07:00:45, 404 Not Found
 * In 2000 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-10 05:44:26, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Chanchu?
There's a bit of an edit war going on over Chanchu, whether it was a TC in the EPAC. While the JTWC does include points east of the date line, that doesn't mean the system was a tropical depression in the EPAC.

To quote the JTWC: WP, 12, 2000072612, , BEST,   0,  64N, 1780W,  20,    0, TD WP, 12, 2000072618,   , BEST,   0,  69N, 1782W,  25,    0, TD WP, 12, 2000072700,   , BEST,   0,  75N, 1786W,  25,    0, TD WP, 12, 2000072706,   , BEST,   0,  80N, 1798W,  20,    0, TD

In their ATCR for 2000, JTWC has a map of these exact points, indicating that TD refers to either tropical depression or disturbance, as Yellow Evan said. The same report says Chanchu did not form until July 28 (page 7) - 28 Jul - 29 Jul, which matches when they issued their first and last warning. The dates on July 26th and 27th match with their assessment for poor and fair chances of development, respectively. I'm going to remove Chanchu from this article unless someone can prove it was a TD in this basin. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * according to IBTrACS:
 * WP122000,           CHANCHU,     16,
 * 20000726, 1200,, LO,  6.4N, 178.0W,  20, 1007, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000726, 1800,, TD,  6.9N, 178.2W,  25, 1007, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000727, 0000,, TD,  7.5N, 178.6W,  25, 1007, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000727, 0600,, LO,  8.0N, 179.8W,  20, 1006, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000727, 1200,, LO,  8.4N, 179.0E,  20, 1005, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000727, 1800,, LO,  8.7N, 178.0E,  20, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000728, 0000,, TD,  9.4N, 177.2E,  25, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000728, 0600,, TD, 10.1N, 176.6E,  25, 1000, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000728, 1200,, TD, 10.8N, 176.4E,  30, 1000, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000728, 1800,, TS, 11.5N, 176.2E,  35,  998, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000729, 0000,, TS, 12.2N, 176.0E,  40,  996, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000729, 0600,, TS, 13.1N, 175.9E,  40,  998, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000729, 1200,, TS, 13.8N, 176.1E,  35, 1000, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000729, 1800,, TD, 14.7N, 177.1E,  30, 1002, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000730, 0000,, LO, 15.5N, 177.8E,  25, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * 20000730, 0600,, LO, 16.6N, 178.6E,  20, 1008, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
 * And TD in IBTrACS means exactly Tropical Depresssion, not disturbance. And we really don't know how updated is JTWCs BT and ATCR. Like shown with CPHC, both can be kinda outdated compared to nowadays JTWC's vision, we don't really know how reliable both BT and ATCR are. ABC paulista (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:2000 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:2001 Pacific hurricane season

Todo
Good writing and content, just needs more on each storm. Jdorje 19:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Track maps! All storms have been added with images. Good kitty 15:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It's complete, but needs editing for language usage and clarity, and inline sources. Good kitty 22:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Inline references
We need inline references for this article per the Wikipedia guide of style. I smacked a no reference banner on the article until refs or notes are added to it. Thegreatdr 22:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Articles
This should get an article for Flossie because we do articles for EVERY storm that Effects the US. Also, It's death toll is rather high. Leave Message orYellow Evan home 13:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1949to2007_epa.txt
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-05-25 03:38:59, 404 Not Found
 * In 1975 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 04:40:15, 404 Not Found
 * In 1991 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:56:22, 404 Not Found
 * In 2001 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 07:11:09, 404 Not Found
 * In 2006 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-26 02:11:28, 404 Not Found
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-06-04 18:43:32, 404 Not Found
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-06-04 21:55:32, 404 Not Found
 * In 1968 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 13:54:59, 404 Not Found
 * In 1975 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 21:14:29, 404 Not Found
 * In 1991 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 00:41:50, 404 Not Found
 * In 1994 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 02:35:20, 404 Not Found
 * In 2001 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-10 07:39:34, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.typhoon2000.ph/garyp_mgtcs/
 * In 2001 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 07:11:20, 403 Forbidden
 * In 2001 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-10 07:39:57, 403 Forbidden

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Rating
I've reduced this article to a C rating as I do not believe the Grammar criterion has been adequately met or properly checked. My reasoning behind this is that whilst reading the section on Hurricane Gil, I noticed a few grammatical errors which hinder you from properly reading that section of the article. Examples: JonEastham (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 'the tropical wave began to show sign of developed as it neared'
 * 'After weakened to a category 1 hurricane'
 * 'Gil was near the edge of the associated with deep convection.'

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on 2001 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101018001257/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2001manuel.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2001manuel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2001 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923101618/http://www.emdat.be/disaster-list to http://www.emdat.be/disaster-list

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

"Hurricane Henriette (2001)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hurricane Henriette (2001). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 25 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 09:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Tropical Storm 2-C
So when and how did TD 2C get upgraded to a tropical storm? The 2001 CPHC report has TD 2C, but IBTRACS lists a 35 kt peak, so I get why editors made it an unnamed storm, but I'd like a bit more context. ? Anyone else? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Its not just IBTRACS that lists it as a 35 kt TS but HURDAT and I think it comes from a CPHC spreadsheet (CPHC ReBest 1966-2003) that was knocking around for a few years, however, I suspect that will know more about it.Jason Rees (talk) 01:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * CPHC Rebest has it as a TD, with some minor differences in coordinates compared to CPHC's report. However, from the page's history I found that cited some kind of 2020 re-analysis that could justify this assessement if valid, since it's more recent than the Rebest, so maybe he could elaborate further about it. ABC paulista (talk) 03:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * After 's comments, I did some checking through old versions of HURDAT and I think we need to speak to the NHC/CPHC about this system, since the 35 kts has been in HURDAT since at least 2014.Jason Rees (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * For the time being, I'd argue that we should follow CPHC Rebest, since it's not the first time that there are disagreements between NHC/HURDAT and CPHC, and since the system was inside CPHC's AoR, their assessement should take preference over HURDAT. ABC paulista (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I sent an email asking for some clarification. Thanks ABC for putting that list together for the disagreements. Ideally those wouldn't be the case, but I agree, if it's in CPHC's AoR and it's listed in their database, we should go with them. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:2001 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:1999 Pacific hurricane season

Todo
Fix typos. They are tampant across the article. Hurricanehink 20:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

 * Storm05, will you please use a spell-checker and a grammar checker. All one has to do is search wikipedia for "dissapated" to find a list of articles that you have edited. — jdorje (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

 * Every storm needs sources and a decent meteorological history. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

 * Came across this page while browsing the WikiProject, so I thought I'd do some copy-editing. Typos begone! -- wacko2 19:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php#1999
 * In 1999 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:42:35, 404 Not Found
 * In 1999 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 23:37:34, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on 1999 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutnames.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1999 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071213191106/http://www.em-dat.net/disasters/Visualisation/emdat_display_list.php to http://www.em-dat.net/disasters/Visualisation/emdat_display_list.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:1999 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:1998 Pacific hurricane season

Untitled
This article needs more info. juan andrés 04:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Agatha
An interesting error on Agatha. The NHC track map (in the infobox) and at the NHC's archive both state Agatha was a hurricane (its type H not TS). However the TCR is for a 55kt TS and the track map itself shows that it never became a hurricane...--Nilfanion (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Very interesting indeed. Maybe they initially planned on upgrading Agatha to hurricane status in post-analysis? I dunno, but they are only humans. I suppose they're free to make mistakes once in a while. --Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Its just a very simple typo by whoever made the track map up (they put a H in instead of T). The track map itself shows that Agatha was a TS. I corrected the commons map.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, T and H aren't that easy to mistake. Thanks for correcting it. --Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It says Hurricane Agatha here too . It mentions 55 knots as well. I guess they said that because it had an eye. Good kitty 00:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://smn.cna.gob.mx/ciclones/tempo1998/pacifico/javier/javier.html
 * In 1998 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:35:08, 404 Not Found
 * In 1998 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-25 11:39:51, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php#1998
 * In 1998 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:35:10, 404 Not Found
 * In 1998 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-25 11:40:00, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Todo
I don't think this is in danger of FAR, but I'd like to see a seasonal summary section added as well as the removal of some overlinking. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  16:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1998 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060710223936/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1998isis.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1998isis.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080429081018/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1998madeline.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1998madeline.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120925113413/http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/assessments/pdfs/txflood.pdf to http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/assessments/pdfs/txflood.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Javier
In an abandoned sandbox I have discovered sometime ago, there is a bit of a information about Javier's damage and deaths. Apparently, Javier caused 162 deaths and $1.5 billion. At least 162 people were killed by flash flooding and mudslides caused by Javier. Unofficial reports indicate that upwards of 1,000 people were killed by the storm, making Javier one of the deadliest tropical cyclones to form in the basin. At least 450,000 people were left homeless and damages from the storm amounted to $1.5 billion. Should I add this information to the main article? I'm not sure if this is reliable.  SMB9 9thx   my edits!  04:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

 * I don't believe those rains and floods were directly caused by Javier. The Weather Prediction Center links the heaviest rainfall to Tropical Storm Frances, over 40" in Chiapas, and CNN/Reuters confirms that the deadly floods occurred in Chiapas. Javier mostly caused rains on the west coast. If anything, I'd suggest a dedicated September 1998 Mexico floods article. For now, the content is in the Frances article, although some of it is unsourced. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:1998 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:1997 Pacific hurricane season

split
This article should be split up, and the western pacific typhoons moved into 1997 Pacific typhoon season. Jdorje

 * It says in the page that typhoons that form east of the dateline, Oliwa and Paka, are of interest because they are monitored by the CPHC. Also, please sign your name, whoever you are. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:01, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

 * Oops, sorry I forgot to sign it. And yes, you're right: however it might be necessary to make it more clear; AFAIK the "Oliwa" and "Paka" names aren't assigned until the storms pass into the wpac (if that's not the case, then I'm confused on how naming is done when storms move between these two basins, and that should be explained too). Jdorje 05:16, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

 * Oliwa and Paka are Central Pacific names. Both became tropical storms in the CPac and received names then but did not become typhoons until reaching the WPac. - Cuivienen 21:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Todo
The storms shouldn't be under the season summary section. There should be separate EPac and CPac storms sections I believe...though maybe it's better to keep them in chronological order. Also, the intro is weak since the first paragraph gives no useful information. Jdorje 03:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that CPac and EPac storms shouldn't be put in seperate storm sections... the two basins run together too much and that is what s done for other seasons. Elsewhere, I changed the lead and put the storms in their own section.
 * Is it possible to have track maps for each storm? Paka, Nora, Linda, and Pauline already have maps. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

A class
I think this article is auperior than a plain Class B article. I'm not going to change the class, but it should be. juan andrés 04:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

 * Generally we've been nominating articles for A-class on the wikiproject talk/assessment page. — jdorje (talk) 13:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

 * Now, all needed is a todo section (obvously here, in the talk page) to see what this article needs to be an FA-class. juan andrés 01:42, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Oliwa's intensity
I could not find a source that gave the minimum pressure for Oliwa, so I commented that part out when filling out its infobox. Does anyone know where to find that number? Tito xd (?!? - help us) 03:24, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

The Source is always the best-track document. For the pacific the really-ugly version can be found at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1949to2004_epa.txt. This file shows not a single pressure measurement for Oliwa. So...there you go... — jdorje (talk) 05:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

29635 08/28/1997 M=21 11 SNBR= 672 OLIWA      XING=1      (CP) 29640 08/28* 0   0   0    0*1181667  15    0*1181671  25    0*1181676  25    0* 29645 08/29*1181681  25    0*1181686  25    0*1181690  25    0*1191693  25    0* 29650 08/30*1211695  25    0*1231700  25    0*1241706  25    0*1241713  25    0* 29655 08/31*1251720  25    0*1261726  25    0*1271731  25    0*1271736  25    0* 29660 09/01*1271741  25    0*1271746  25    0*1271752  25    0*1271758  30    0* 29665 09/02*1281764  30    0*1301769  30    0*1311773  30    0*1321777  30    0* 29670 09/03*1331782  35    0*1331787  35    0*1321792  35    0*1311798  35    0* 29675 09/04*1311806  35    0*1311817  35    0*1311830  35    0*1331845  35    0* 29680 09/05*1371860  35    0*1421871  35    0*1461879  35    0*1501887  35    0* 29685 09/06*1551896  35    0*1601901  35    0*1641922  35    0*1671935  40    0* 29690 09/07*1701947  45    0*1731957  50    0*1751966  55    0*1771974  60    0* 29695 09/08*1791982  60    0*1801990  65    0*1812001  65    0*1812013  75    0* 29700 09/09*1812025  90    0*1812038 105 0*1822051 125 0*1842065 140    0* 29705 09/10*1862079 140 0*1892092 140    0*1912106 140 0*1932120 140    0* 29710 09/11*1952134 140 0*1992147 140    0*2032160 135    0*2082173 130    0* 29715 09/12*2132186 125    0*2192199 125    0*2252213 120    0*2322226 115    0* 29720 09/13*2402239 105    0*2492251 105    0*2572262 100    0*2652274 100    0* 29725 09/14*2732285  95    0*2792294  90    0*2832300  90    0*2862303  85    0* 29730 09/15*2892305  85    0*2932305  85    0*2992303  80    0*3062299  75    0* 29735 09/16*3162293  70    0*3302283  65    0*3412269  60    0*3512254  45    0* 29740 09/17*3622238  35    0*3772216  25    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*
 * So, I guess "pressure unknown" is what's going to stay there, huh? Tito xd (?!? - help us) 05:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

 * I saw a value mentioned in the JTWC's report. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 17:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

 * Yes, on the JTWC Report's on the last page it says "MIN SLP 898 mb".

Peer Review (you can help!!)
I think this article deserves a peer review to improve it to FA. I think this article is very well done and it has all characteristics (in my opinion) of a Featured Article. I think that:

 * Text is well organized.
 * The article is written pretty nice.
 * It has tables that support the article [pretty nice table I think :)]
 * The pictures support strongly the article.
 * Templates synthesize all the information.
 * The article cites its references.
 * It has an introductory paragraph.

Since assessment, I think this article is ignored and needs to be peer viewed.

Sincerely, juan andrés 03:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I would like to see the tables redone a bit. These were madeline's first tables, I think, and since then we've achieved a mroe consistent set of tables as seen in List of Category 5 Pacific hurricanes, List of Category 5 Atlantic hurricanes, and List of retired Atlantic hurricanes.  Another potential/future table format, which you should give your opinions on, is in 2003 Atlantic hurricane season. — jdorje (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

 * The table is fine, because it synthesizes all the impact information, but the problem is that is a little messy. I think a little bit of color would be fine. Now my question: What is it meant by "more consistent"? My first thought was that the table was obsolete. Maybe I'm correct mayebe not, so I wish the answer was specified. juan andrés 21:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

 * The difference is that there is no table sorting storms by intensity, unlike in those other articles. — jdorje (talk) 02:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I got it! Thank you juan andrés 04:37, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I have a better idea! Why not to put the table on a new article called "2003 Atlantic hurricane season statistics"? Because the chart looks a little messy in the article. juan andrés 21:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

 * There are some difficulties with trying to get this featured... which will be hard to deal with. Such as whitespace between some of the sections on individual storms because of the size of the pictures. I'll try and reduce whitespace. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 01:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

 * Elsewhere, whitespace problems are solved either by alternating the alignment of the pictures or by using clearright/clearleft instead of clear. Or both. — jdorje (talk) 02:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

 * 3 suggestions to reduce whitespace: Use see also links to the NHC archive, like with 2004AHS, expand on the entries slightly and edit the pics (Carlos could be cropped easily).--Nilfanion (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Here's some info on evacuations for Rick. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Here's a link that says Olaf caused 18 deaths in Guatemala and El Salvador, as well as a bit other Olaf impact. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

According to Dartmouth Flood Observatory, Andres caused 4 deaths from its flooding in El Salvador. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Timeline
I am currently working on an external timeline in the manner of recent seasons. Should there be a seperate article, Timeline of the 1997 Pacific hurricane season, or not? Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It would probably overwhelm the rest of the article, so I say yes. Tito xd (?!?) 23:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2005. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Tropical Depressions
If it is not possible to expand these sections further, please remove the infoboxes. The old section for depressions is commented out.Potapych (talk) 02:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments
Nergaal (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * please link the terms in the legends (i.e. the categories)
 * the article would look better if the infoboxes would alternate left and right. right now it makes the article feel like it is missing important text because of the huge gaps.

 * I personally think the article is missing some information. Comparing it to 2003 Pacific hurricane season it seems some of the sections are a bit on the short side. It is understandable for a few of the depressions (which maybe could be merged into a single depressions section), but for the hurricanes I think there is more information that could be added from the TCR. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, the article should get rid of its references to knots. The WPTC uses only metric and imperial units. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You can remove the infoboxes for the depressions, but I wouldn't merge the sections. Stating things are from date formed to date dissipated and then stating the pressure and wind speeds five times for five storms is difficult to follow.
 * The reference section is missing the authors' names for each report. Use parameters from cite web if that template isn't already being used here.
 * Also, people should be aware that images that are cropped longer than they are wide will add more whitespace below the text. If you're using GIBBS you should crop them to a perfect square.Potapych (talk) 23:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

 * I removed all references to knots, and converted the references to cite X. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 03:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Articles
I think we cad do pages for Oliwa, Andres, Olaf.Leave Message orYellow Evan home 03:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yellow Evan, you don't have to go around to talk pages asking for articles. Somebody will get to it eventually. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  13:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Thers i things i notice. You will find more about it next mouth.14:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Comment
I think this article is ready for FAC. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home
 * It depends. I think the article could benefit from being reformatted like the 2006 season, considering how active and destructive the season was. After all, the current format is more like a list than an actual article. --Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Personally I think it would be hard to call this article a "list", since it's almost entirely comprised of readable text. That said, I do think the 2005-format is ideal for more active seasons, but given the quality of the 1997 PHS article in its current state, I don't see it as a top priority to rewrite it. – Juliancolton  | Talk 03:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The very earliest seasons, (like Pre-1900 Pacific hurricane seasons), regardless of basin, probably could be treated as lists. If we do do this one in the new format we'd might was well do other more active ones (like 1992) in the new format as well. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 15:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ill try the 1992 PHS rewrite after I bring this to FA. I have expanded the sections as indicated here. Should I nominate for FAC?

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1949to2009_epa.txt
 * In 1990 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:51:53, 404 Not Found
 * In 1990 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-07 23:57:35, 404 Not Found
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 03:14:52, 404 Not Found
 * In 2010 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-18 15:20:34, 404 Not Found
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 20:58:01, 404 Not Found
 * In 1997 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 23:20:56, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/sgx/research/Guide/weatherhistory.pdf
 * In 1939 California tropical storm on 2011-05-25 03:13:36, 404 Not Found
 * In 1987 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:39:55, 404 Not Found
 * In 1939 California tropical storm on 2011-06-04 16:00:08, 404 Not Found
 * In 1951–1964 Pacific hurricane seasons on 2011-06-04 17:40:09, 404 Not Found
 * In 1939 California tropical storm on 2011-06-24 02:23:18, 404 Not Found
 * In 1987 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 07:04:28, 404 Not Found
 * In 1997 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 23:21:21, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php#1997
 * In 1997 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:27:51, 404 Not Found
 * In 1997 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 23:21:49, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 one external links on 1997 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050925163446/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997blanca.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997blanca.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922224921/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997td3e.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997td3e.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050925163528/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997carlos.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997carlos.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922225118/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997td5e.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997td5e.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050925163016/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997dolores.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997dolores.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050925163433/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997enrique.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997enrique.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050925163506/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997hilda.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997hilda.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050925163406/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997kevin.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997kevin.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050925163221/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997marty.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1997marty.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060521133856/http://www.cnn.com:80/WEATHER/9710/08/pauline/index.html to http://www.cnn.com/WEATHER/9710/08/pauline/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927234401/http://www.cofemermir.gob.mx/uploadtests/4054.66.59.1.STAD%C3%8DSTICAS-RIESGOS-ATENUAR.DOC to http://www.cofemermir.gob.mx/uploadtests/4054.66.59.1.STAD%C3%8DSTICAS-RIESGOS-ATENUAR.DOC
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5f9vkkp2f?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ofcm.gov%2Fihc07%2Fweb-61st-IHC-Booklet.pdf to http://www.ofcm.gov/ihc07/web-61st-IHC-Booklet.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1997 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910161627/http://www.weather.gov/directives/sym/pd01006006curr.pdf to http://www.weather.gov/directives/sym/pd01006006curr.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Tropical Storm Ignacio (1997) into 1997 Pacific hurricane season
Impact is very minimal and seems to be of WP:ROUTINE nature. Noah, AATalk 14:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Support merge – A minimal tropical storm that had minimal impact. The story of this unremarkable storm can be fully told in the season article. Drdpw (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Support - it's a borderline case, but the MH was short, and the impacts could be summarized easily. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose The storm broke rainfall records for tropical rainfall in two states (Washington and Oregon, the Oregon record was later broken) and brought record breaking rainfall to West Coast cities for the month of August. How far northwest it spread is also very unusual.108.58.37.250 (talk) 21:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * In addition, I found this journal on the storm from 2012, and this journal from 1999, plus there is significant coverage of the storm from this source in 2020, so there is certainly some WP:SUSTAINED coverage.108.58.37.250 (talk) 21:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The palisadeshudson article makes passing mention of Ignacio and the 1999 AMS journal article is about the 1997 EP hurricane season as a whole, not just Ignacio. Neither sufficiently demonstrate notability for this specific storm, nor do they together. The 2012 AMS article is an academic meteorological case study on the storm, and does demonstrate its notability to some degree. However, one article alone, 15 years later, does not constitute "sustained coverage". Drdpw (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Honestly, I don't mind a merge, given that it was just a minimal, very weak storm with minimal impacts. However, it has some notability, given that it set unusual TC rainfall records in two northwest states. Plus, the impact section in the storm article is sufficient enough with its minimal impacts. It can be summarized more in its storm section in the season article, yes it definitely needs that, but I'm on the fence on whether this should be merged or not. The season article is arguably just fine and adequate on its own, although it could use some expanding. ~  Sandy 14156   ( Talk ✉ )  21:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

 * Support per nom, as the storm does not appear to be notable. Contents, incl. rainfall records, can be integrated within the season article. ArkHyena (talk) 01:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:1997 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:1996 Pacific hurricane season

Untitled
I've expanded the sections on Douglas and Fausto, based on the NHC reports.-- Erimus, 3/1/06

Elida? Jdorje 03:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Genevieve? juan andrés 04:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Put because there are sections with less than two lines! juan andrés 04:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

In need of love
This article is in need of love. ''Fausto made landfall in Mexico twice. It killed one person'' is not a complete section, neither description. It's a poor inaccurate sentence. Also two storms are missing juan andrés 04:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I have done a lot of love to this article... all that's needed now is more pictures. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

GA on hold
The units should be in line with other seasons. What that line is under discussion, but at the very least knots and nautical miles should be converted. When referring to unnamed storms, do not call them by their number, as they do not have names. In the sections, try and keep it fairly linear and organized. I notice some sections jump, particularly due to the forced spacing. For example, the section on Tropical Storm One gives its storm history, then it says its peak intensity. When did it reach its peak strength? The same goes for all other sections that do that. There's more little things like that. Also, sentences like these bother me and don't seem particularly well written. ''One person was killed in Tecpan. Near that location, three other people drowned. Five fishers were missing from near Tecpan.'' Isn't there a way to combine the three very similar sentences into one? Try and use active voice more and less linking verbs, whenever possible. Check for typos, as well. Satellite images for all of the storms would be good. All in all, not too much needs to be done. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

GA review
After reviewing the article, it is now of good quality. The style of writing is decent; it could be better in some spots. There were three typos, which I fixed. It is very factually accurate, no problems there. It is sufficiently broad for a season article — not too much detail and not too little. It is non-POV and stable. One problem is the lack of storm images, which would be a great improvement. All in all, it is good, though not perfect. It passes, nonetheless. Good job Miss Madeline. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

New format of article - revert?
The article was recently remodeled to be in line with some of the other newer Atlantic season articles. However, it appears it is largely the same as the old version, with a little bit of information removed. There is no impact section in the current version. This season wasn't record-breaking, and in fact it was pretty below-average, in terms of activity. I don't think there should be a separate article, and I believe the article should be restored to its previous version. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree. It's basically the same as the old revision, but with new formatting. The only difference now is that the article has no impact section and is poorly formatted. Either revert or send it to GAR. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1949to2006_epa.txt
 * In 1960 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 03:41:55, 404 Not Found
 * In 1985 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:14:25, 404 Not Found
 * In 1996 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:21:39, 404 Not Found
 * In 2006 Central Pacific cyclone on 2011-05-26 01:58:29, 404 Not Found
 * In 1960 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-04 18:56:59, 404 Not Found
 * In 1960 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-04 22:02:27, 404 Not Found
 * In 1975 Pacific Northwest hurricane on 2011-06-06 21:13:26, 404 Not Found
 * In 1985 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-07 11:47:27, 404 Not Found
 * In 1996 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 04:09:38, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 one external links on 1996 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996unnamed.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070820183334/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996boris.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996boris.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927183033/http://wwwnotes.reliefweb.int/w/RWB.NSF/480fa8736b88bbc3c12564f6004c8ad5/225921ce1d150f66c1256377003249a6?OpenDocument to http://wwwnotes.reliefweb.int/w/RWB.NSF/480fa8736b88bbc3c12564f6004c8ad5/225921ce1d150f66c1256377003249a6?OpenDocument
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722223004/http://gaceta.cicese.mx/ver.php?topico=especial&ejemplar=102&id=76 to http://gaceta.cicese.mx/ver.php?topico=especial&ejemplar=102&id=76
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070619030405/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov:80/1996hernan.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996hernan.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1996 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996unnamed.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923101618/http://www.emdat.be/disaster-list to http://www.emdat.be/disaster-list
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996hernan.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

"Tropical Strom Elida (1996)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tropical Strom Elida (1996). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 01:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:1996 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:1995 Pacific hurricane season

Untitled
This article says that Ismael was the sixth-deadliest Pacific storm, yet the template for deadly Pacific storms puts Ismael at fifth. Which is it? - Cuivienen 00:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

 * It's put that way because I don't know what the missing storm in the top 5 is. That hurricane must have killed at least 105 people. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Ive Added some info on TD 1 And Hurricane Adolph based on the Nhc Reports Jason Rees 20:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Be sure to be careful with your spelling and grammar. There were over 8 spelling errors in those little sections. The Adolph section has no punctuation. It should be two separate sentence, and the first sentence should start with a capital error. The Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject is trying to make a high-quality encyclopedia for tropical cyclones, and poor errors such as "depresion" (which should be depression), "hurricanne" (which should be hurricane), dissapted (which should be dissipated), and other such mistakes tarnish our reputation as a leading source for tropical cyclone information. Please be more conscious and more careful of your spelling and grammar errors. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 21:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Todo
What else has to be done before B class, GA nom, or even a potential FAC run? If possible, could someone copyedit the article? Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * An ACE chart? RaNdOm26 10:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if it's B-class yet, but I'll leave it for now. I agree that a general copyedit to look for mistakes in grammar, spelling and sentence structure is needed first. – Chacor 10:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I just copyedited the few spelling errors, didn't copyedit anything else. Hello32020 12:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the copyediting. I was using a crappy computer at my school library, which tends to mix up letters and have other letters stick. I'll add an ACE chart in. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

GA Passed
Good job, here are a few bot generated suggestions to bring this article to FA-class. Hope this helps. Tarret 23:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -  between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 2fT, use 2 fT, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 2&nbsp;fT.
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.
 * Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Guide to layout.
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1949to2009_epa.txt
 * In 1990 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:51:53, 404 Not Found
 * In 1990 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-07 23:57:35, 404 Not Found
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 03:14:52, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.proteccioncivil.gob.mx/upLoad/Publicaciones/ised_80_89.pdf
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:15:58, 404
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 03:15:48, 404

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php#1995
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:15:57, 404 Not Found
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 03:15:58, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 4
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=8228149&firstvisit=true&currentResult=4&currentPage=0
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 03:15:39, 404 Not Found
 * In 1995 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 20:58:07, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on 1995 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~189430
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090831170642/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov:80/1995ismael.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1995ismael.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071129132838/http://www.ine.gob.mx/dgicurg/cclimatico/download/cancun_analisis_costos.pdf to http://www.ine.gob.mx/dgicurg/cclimatico/download/cancun_analisis_costos.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519223635/http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~223386 to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~223386

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on 1995 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101206195446/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 1995 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060621065350/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1995flossie.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1995flossie.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060621065402/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1995henriett.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1995henriett.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1995ismael.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090831174632/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1995juliette.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1995juliette.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1995 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204185839/http://www.eclac.cl/mexico/publicaciones/sinsigla/xml/5/8385/anx.pdf to http://www.eclac.cl/mexico/publicaciones/sinsigla/xml/5/8385/anx.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Hurricane Juliette (1995) into 1995 Pacific hurricane season
Fails WP:NWX since the impact was very minimal and could be considered routine. Noah, AATalk 14:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Support, benefits the season article since the section is so short, and the season article is on the short side. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:1995 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:1994 Pacific hurricane season

Gilma the Strongest?
John had higher winds but Gilma had lower pressure. Hmmm, who takes the cake here? -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 18:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

 * Pressure is everything. Except I highly doubt Gilma had lower pressure; the pressure readings on John are incomplete.  So I'd go with John and just don't mention pressure in the infobox. Jdorje 21:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Info
Could we at least provide info on which storms were hurricanes? Weatherman90 21:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Exactly! Its a stub.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Todo
It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * *Looks around...crickets chirp* ... ... Alright I'll do it. →Cycl   one1 → 03:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I put up the "Inuse" tag, added on infobox, and quit. Do not panic, it's just 11:00 here in Florida, and I'm going to sleep. I'll pick it up again tomorrow, I promise. →Cycl   one1 → 03:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Halfway there, will finish later. →Cycl   one1 → 15:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please {{subst:  your {{tl|clear}}s, thanks. – Chacor 02:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, sorry. →Cycl   one1 → 00:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Todo2
Inline sourcing and more info. A one paragraph description for storm history (6-8 lines average, more if longer track) should be there, along with a paragraph for impact (if any). Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to reference format. Thegreatdr 04:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe that I have done all that. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 04:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Spinoffs
Should there be an Olivia spinoff article? As I intend to make this season into a GA, it is a question that must be asked. Olivia is the only one of the ten most intense Pacific hurricanes not to have an article. ( skips Gilma for some reason, but I'll soon correct that. Making an article would potentially, along with getting Hurricane Juliette (2001) up to speed another possible featured/good topic. However, that, and sharing with Juliette the distinction of being the most intense Pacific hurricane not to reach Category 5 intensity is the only thing Olivia has going for it. I am not sure it is appropriate to make an article solely for that reason. In addition, an Olivia article made for that reason will eventually become obsolete. Sooner or later there will be two Pacific hurricanes deeper than 923 mb, whilc will knock Olivia off the template. (It must be two hurricanes because a single hurricane would knock Olivia and Juliette into tenth place, resulting in the template being a "Top 11", but we can just arbitrarily eliminate Olivia or Juliette, and a Top 9 is a silly number to make a template for; two systems are needed to knock Olivia and Juliette out of the top 10). Hence, I am starting a discussion on whether or not we should make an Olivia article. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't see why not. I'm personally in favor of giving every named storm an article, and a Category 4 certainly deserves one if we have this. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd might was well put Rosa and Li on the potential spinoff table too. But for Rosa, almost all articles at the Newspaper Archive were basically copies of the one I have already cited for the 400 evacuees. However, the 700 million in damage which Rosa was a factor in (but of course not the sole cause of) is quite high for a Pacific hurricane. Whatever decision ultimately comes of this, spinoffs will have to wait until this article is up to GA status. And if we decide to end the spinoffs with what we already have, we'll have a GT. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Li had no impact, so I see no need for that article. I don't think an Olivia article is needed (especially if it's only to make that topic). Given its damage figure, as well as hurricane-force landfall, I'd like to see an article for Rosa, and IMO that is the one that is needed the most. However, it's all up to how much work one person wants to do. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hink, you basically gave out my reasons for not wanting to do an Olivia article (I didn't say it out front so as not to unduely influence the discussion). The only reason I suggested Li wasn because it had a long section. I am in more agreement about Rosa. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 04:28, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

 * I am making Rosa article. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 22:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes for 0liva. Leave Message orYellow Evan home or User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox 02:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Central Pacific ACE
Should there be something mentioning that the Central Pacific ACE is higher than the East Pacific ACE? 71.147.56.125 (talk) 18:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

 * I'm not sure if the central Pacific ACE was a record this year, or if it is notable. If it is, then I guess so. 76.235.214.247 (talk) 23:45, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1949to2007_epa.txt
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-05-25 03:38:59, 404 Not Found
 * In 1975 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 04:40:15, 404 Not Found
 * In 1991 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:56:22, 404 Not Found
 * In 2001 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 07:11:09, 404 Not Found
 * In 2006 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-26 02:11:28, 404 Not Found
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-06-04 18:43:32, 404 Not Found
 * In 1959 Mexico hurricane on 2011-06-04 21:55:32, 404 Not Found
 * In 1968 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 13:54:59, 404 Not Found
 * In 1975 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 21:14:29, 404 Not Found
 * In 1991 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 00:41:50, 404 Not Found
 * In 1994 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 02:35:20, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.hawaiiclubofsanantonio.org/Links/Hawaiian_Names/N.htm
 * In 1994 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:10:41, 404 Not Found
 * In 1994 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 02:35:30, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=22314180_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=1&currentPage=0
 * In 1994 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 02:35:41, 404 Not Found
 * In 1994 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 20:45:40, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on 1994 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120427194801/http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=22314180_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=1&currentPage=0 to http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=22314180_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=1&currentPage=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1994 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184656/http://www.australiansevereweather.com/cyclones/2004/summ0404.htm to http://www.australiansevereweather.com/cyclones/2004/summ0404.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:1994 Pacific hurricane season


text:
Talk:1993 Pacific hurricane season

Revamping the article
I'm in the slow process of rewriting and improving this article and the storm by storm sections, as you can see. Does it look better now and are the storm information better in terms of structure, content, and detail? Also, is the overall format better now? It may be a little messy, but I'm in the gradual process of improving this article and revamping the writing, organization, details, and storm information. Any todo or thoughts? Also, can anyone offer to help on organizing the storm by storm sections I'm revamping and add the finish touches? Hurricanehink? Anyone? Thanks. I want to get this article cleaned up and really well organized and detailed. CapeVerdeWave 26 August 2006, 15:51 (UTC)

 * Very nice job so far, and keep up the good work. The structure is good. All you have to do is get the storm summaries and storm pics for the rest of the storms. Some

s would be nice, as well as some Wikification changes. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 20:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Thanks. I just added some clears for spacing between the each of the individual storm accounts. Can you help out a bit along with me as I complete the rest of the storm accounts, add more details, edit, fix spelling errors, add the finishing touches, and Wikify the aricle and add the rest of storm reports (preliminary reports from NOAA) and other sources? I'm really trying to get this article up to standards, especially B class or above, as I am doing on many other articles (seasons, storms, etc.) and attempting to fix many up from all basins as part of the Tropical Cyclones Wikiproject. CapeVerdeWave 26 August 2006, 21:50 (UTC)

 * I wish I could help, but RL is really busy, not to mention I have a couple of other projects I'm working on here. I can guide you to some very useful info. The NHC EPAC archive, which you may or not have been using, has news stories, local information, and discussions to help lengthen the lower important storms. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Yep, I've already been using the archives for the information, detailing, reorganizing, revamping, and updating/fixing/editing of the storm accounts and this article. Any other sources? I know of several others, but any links to them to get the information from? Thanks. CapeVerdeWave 27 August 2006, 15:08 (UTC)

 * Not really, that's the only thing I can think of. The biggest problem will be taking the time to add the storm summaries, not necessarily the info. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 19:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Major hurricanes
This season had nine of them. That could be a record. I'm going to try and look that up. -- § Hurricane E  RIC  archive 18:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Nevermind, 1992 had ten. -- § Hurricane E  RIC  archive 18:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Bot report : Found duplicate references !
In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) DumZiBoT (talk) 18:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * "NOAA4" :
 * National Hurricane Center Fernanda preliminary report
 * Central Pacific Hurricane Center report on Fernanda

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

 * http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php#1993
 * In 1993 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:05:14, 404 Not Found
 * In 1993 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 20:00:00, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:1993 Pacific hurricane season