text:
User talk:Nautilus77

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Nautilus77


text:
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Polygamy

Case Opened on 17:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

This case is a merger of "User:Researcher99 on the Polygamy and Group marriage pages" and "Abuses on Polygamy article", see Talk page for the original requests.

Case Closed on 02:52, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this request. (All participants are subject to Arbitration Committee decisions, and the ArbCom will consider each participant's role in the dispute.) Comments are very welcome on the Talk page, and will be read, in full. Evidence, no matter who can provide it, is very welcome at /Evidence. Evidence is more useful than comments.

Arbitrators will be working on evidence and suggesting proposed decisions at /Workshop and voting on proposed decisions at /Proposed decision.

Involved parties

 * (initiating party through official AMA advocate aka Neigel von Teighen)

Statement by AMA advocate of party 1
Statement by Neigel von Teighen official AMA advocate of User:Researcher99 (see )

User:Researcher99 has been attacked constantly by User:Nereocystis in many polygamy related articles, but specially in Polygamy and in Talk:Polygamy with abusive behaivor including POV warring, unexplaine reversions and constant ad hominem attacks in his posts. Although all tries to solve the dispute through RfC (started by the other party), official mediation (started by us), Nereocystis has shown no intention to solve the dispute in a civil manner, so we request this arbitration to stop this abuse against Researcher. --Neigel von Teighen 15:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Statement by party 1
Researcher 21:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Please see: Polygamy Dispute Background for a better understanding of the polygamy topic, anti-polygamists, and this dispute.

Nereocystis is a proven anti-polygamist. No one who "support(s) the legalization of polygamy," would do what Nereocystis has done. In every way, Nereocystis misrepresents me and the real dispute. This dispute is not about me as a "Christian polygamist" POV editor or about "link spamming." This is about Nereocystis's hostile anti-polygamy agenda to game the Wikipedia process system to abuse me, so that anti-polygamists can freely sabotage the polygamy articles.

When I first encountered Nereocystis, I sincerely tried to accommodate their input. I also tried sincere accommodation with Ghostintheshell when they arrived in April. Identically, both refused any accommodation I offered, demanded sources when I did, obfuscated sources I cited, claimed I "refused" to TALK when I clearly sought STATUS QUO in order to TALK, used the announcement method, and did not know the polygamy topic. For these reasons, I believe that Ghostintheshell is simply Nereocystis or are anti-polygamists working together.

I have very much offered and proposed a number of ways to genuinely solve issues.

Nereocystis has never offered/proposed even one resolution of their own to try to accommodate and work with me.
 * April 29, 2005 DIFF, with Ghostintheshell
 * June 30, 2005 Anti-polygamy article (archived here) created for NPOV and mutual fairness.
 * August 5, 2005 DIFF - comprehensive and very WIN-WIN resoluton offer.
 * August 26, 2005 DIFF - a WIN-WIN and NPOV resolution offer on the Talk:Group_marriage page.

For that reason, they may have been unqualified to have so prematurely filed the "3rd Opinion" (here) and an "RfC" (here).

Rather than offer any of their own resolutions, Nereocystis perpetrated a very calculated and sophisticated exploitation of the Wikipedia process. (While I am a simple content editor, Nereocystis is a Wikipedia process expert.) As this June 6, 2005 post shows, they even admitted their clever intent to game the Wikipedia process system early on, with their ultimate intent "to request an action against" me. Nereocystis sabotaged my offers and the RfM my AMA advocate filed, and still turned around and lied, saying I "refused mediation." Throughout, they also advanced many different forms of abuse.

I always declared that we need to follow the Wikipedia Guidelines of restoring an article to STATUS QUO before TALKING. Nereocystis ignored that, instead aggressively and very quickly "running right over me," disallowing me to restore to STATUS QUO to then TALK.

Nereocystis knew they could usually count on that "92% of people" who view polygamy unfavorably (see this external source) to bring an anti-polygamy bias with them. So, Nereocystis regularly used the announcement method to attract others to join them. Such others would not follow the Wikipedia Guidelines of STATUS QUO, including the few recommendations/resolutions others suggested. Nereocystis would then lie, saying that I "refused" to solve the problems or to TALK, when I alone was the one who was always trying to solve the problem within Wikipedia Guidelines and WIN-WIN methods.

Kewp arrived very late in this dispute (after content discussion had ceased). Their involvement in this RfArb is virtually meaningless, except to prove how hostile that anti-polygamists are in seeking to sabotage the polygamy articles.

- Researcher 21:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Statement by party 2
Please limit your statement to 500 words

Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (4/0/0/0)

 * Accept and merge Fred Bauder 21:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Accept. James F. (talk) 23:14, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Accept ➥the Epopt 04:06, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Accept and merge. Kelly Martin 15:03, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Accept and merge Fred Bauder 21:34, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Accept. James F. (talk) 23:12, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Accept ➥the Epopt 13:52, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Accept and merge. Kelly Martin 15:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Temporary injunction (none)
=Final decision=

Obsessional point of view
1) In certain cases a Wikipedia editor will tendentiously focus their attention in an obsessive way. Such users may be banned from editing in the affected area if it becomes problematic.

 * Passed 7-0

Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy
2) What Wikipedia is not provides that Wikipedia is not a platform for propaganda or advocacy.

 * Passed 7-0

Assume good faith
3) Wikipedia editors as a part of Civility are expected to assume good faith, simply, to adopt a cooperative posture rather than an antagonistic one with other editors.

 * Passed 7-0

Researcher99's claims of expertise
1) claims to have "researched Polygamy for years".

 * Passed 7-0

Researcher99's scope of editing
2) 's editing at Wikipedia has been almost exclusively limited to Polygamy, discussion pages related to that page, and user talk pages.

 * Passed 7-0

Opponents
3) has taken the position that those who differ regarding editing of polygamy form a coherent "anti-polygamy" block, "Gangs of Sneaky Vandals" who use "anti-polygamy tactics" . See Requests_for_arbitration/Polygamy/Workshop, especially comments by others.

 * Passed 7-0

Researcher99 banned from editing polygamy-related articles
1) Researcher99 is banned indefinitely from editing articles which relate to polygamy

 * Passed 7-0


text:
User talk:Outlineofadeadman

You article has been speedy deleted as non-notable. Please visit WP:NOT for information about the types of articles Wikipedia does not contain. Thank you. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 17:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Please see Articles for deletion/Outline of a deadman. Thank you, Sango  123  17:37, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Blanking content, damaging the article or adding nonsense, derogatory/insulting language or profanity to Wikipedia is considered vandalism. Such activity will lead to you being blocked. Stop now! Thank you.

Articles for deletion/Outline of a deadman
If you wish to provide reasons why this article should not be deleted, please see Articles for deletion/Outline of a deadman. In the meantime, please do NOT remove the deletion notice on the article. Thanks. Carbonite | Talk 18:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. You may come back in a short time to participate in the Articles for Deletion discussion mentioned above. Thank you. ∞ Who ? ¿ ? 18:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Outlineofadeadman


text:
× Brassoepidendrum

× Brassoepidendrum, abbreviated Bepi. in the horticultural trade, is the nothogenus of intergeneric orchid hybrids including wild ancestors from both genera Brassavola and Epidendrum, and from no others.

title: × Brassoepidendrum


text:
User talk:ASU

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:03, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Synbot
Synbot has been proposed for deletion as a suspected hoax. Please provide sources for your information to comply with WP:V. If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If the prod tag is removed without the concerns being addressed, the article may still face deletion through debate at Articles for deletion. NickelShoe 22:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Digital double
An editor has nominated Digital double, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:ASU


text:
WBWC

WBWC (88.3 FM) – branded 88.3 FM The Sting – is a non-commercial educational college/alternative rock radio station licensed to Berea, Ohio, serving western parts of Greater Cleveland. Owned by Baldwin Wallace University, the station is operated by both faculty and students. The WBWC studios are located at Loomis Hall on the Baldwin Wallace campus in Berea, while the station transmitter resides in North Olmsted.

History
In 1939 Baldwin Wallace University (then Baldwin Wallace College) first applied for and got their first Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Radio License. They did nothing with it until in 1946 the College's Speech Department revisited the idea, but it wasn't until 1955, when a group of 9 students asked Student Council to help bring a radio station to campus. Many campaings to finance this new radio station happen in the years leading up to when WBWC would first sign on in 1958. Before that could happen though they would need permission from the FCC which was granted on May 8th, 1957.

The studios behind the bleachers in the Ursprung Gymnasium was completed in October, and on February 2nd 1958 a 68ft antenna tower was raised just outside the gymnasium with lots of student help. The Cleveland Plain Dealer would write a article about this feat and was published on February 3rd 1958. Then, on the week of February 24th, the FCC would grant WBWC a license to broadcast at 10 Watts on 88.3 FM. From February 25th to March 1st of 1958 there were various test broadcasts done to make sure equipment was working. One such broadcast included the class AA Sectional Basketball Tournament games being held in the adjacent gymnaisum, with then WBWC's Sports Director Bob McLean and crew providing play-by-play coverage.

On Sunday March 2nd, 1958 WBWC officially signed on as the first totally student funded and operated radio station in the United States. WBWC would also be the first college radio station in the Northeastern Ohio area. There was a huge ceremony held for the occaision, having a go on the sound board was Baldwin Wallace College President Dr. Alfred Byran Bonds Jr., Station Manager Jim Huta, Student Council President Lou Cessaratto, and City of Berea Mayor Ernest R. Quackenbush. The station would just broadcast for a few hours everyday, and would go off-air over the summer break for the near future.

In the fall of 1959 work would begin to create a companion AM "carrier current" that would send signal through the electrical lines equipped in buildings. On November 3rd, 1960 the first broadcast on the AM carrier current happened, and would be dubbed the Stardust program, which allowed students to listen to music while studying on the late evenings. Two days later the AM Carrier would broadcast play-by-play for the Baldwin Wallace v. Heidelburg football game. In 1969 WBWC remained on-air over the summer, but this would prove to be a one-time occurrence until the min 70's. On Monday January 1970 WBWC did a 105 hour long marathon with the purpose of raising money for the Muscular Dystrophy Association. This would also become a collegiate record for the longest single broadcast. In 1971 B.R. Anthony debuts his specialty show to WBWC, origionally called "The Glory That Was Grease" now know as "The Golden Age of Rock and Roll" which still airs today every Sunday night.

Over the summer of 1973 WBWC's studios underwent renovations but due to them going longer than expected WBWC would not sign back on until October. While this was going on Student Senate began a investigation into the operations of WBWC and major changes would happen the high-ups. In the early months of 1975 WBWC would begin broadcasting in stereo for their listeners. The Summer of 1975 would be the start of WBWC remaining on-air over the summer months. In September of 1976 the broadcasting tower was hit by lightning causing operations to cease until January of 1977 due to the new need for a working antenna. In 1978 the station received a construction permit from the FCC to raise power to 1000 watts, but the officer's council voted down the power increase.

On March 27th, 1980 the first official marathon would happen. It was hosted by Russ Lindsay and was a 18 hour marathon of Elton John. The following Summer the annual Summer Marathon Series would begin. In 1981 WBWC would raise their power to 100 watts, the new FCC minimum. In the Summer on 1983 the Summer Marathon Series would be moved from Tuesdays to Thursdays, where it remains today. In 1984 WBWC's studios would be moved to the second floor of the Strosacker College Union causing the station to go off-air for about 6 months. 1984 would also see the start of "Sunday Night at the Oldies," a specialty show hosted by Tom LaMoreaux that still airs now, every Sunday night. In 1989 WBWC Switches to a professionally modeled Alternative Rock hits format.

On September 10th, 1993 WBWC was granted permission to increase their power to 3000 watts, but would need to move to the frequency 91.5 FM, requiring WOBC to move to the frequency 88.3 FM, which was agreed but a new management team decided to back out. This year WBWC would no longer be a student organization, and funding would change from the Student Senate to the Speech Department. In 1994 "The Sting" was created and has stayed around into the 2020's. In 1995, Baldwin Wallace celebrated 150 years, during this celebration WBWC became the very first college radio station to perform a remote broadcast from the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland. A similar broadcast occurs later from Gund Arena for a Baldwin Wallace v. John Carroll Basketball game.

On February 14th, 2001 WBWC increases its power to 4000 watts, where it is at currently today. On June 12, 2003 WBWC would broadcast a U2 marathon from the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame as apart of their Summer Marathon Series. The following year WBWC would do the same with The Who. WBWC was the only radio station in Cleveland to carry the "Vote For Change" tour live from Washington D.C.

In August of 2022, before the start of the fall semester, WBWC moved studios once again, into Loomis Hall, just next door to the Student Union. In March 2023 WBWC celebrated its latest milestone of 65 years of broadcasting.

Current programming
WBWC airs 24 hours of alternative rock every day. During weekday overnights, the station airs a variety of music styles. On Sunday evening, the station airs The Golden Age of Rock and Roll, Sunday Night at the Oldies, and Extra Innings. Public Service to the community includes news via the Associated Press at the start of every hour. During the summer months, WBWC airs the weekly Summer Marathon Series: every Thursday, the station features 18 hours of music centered on a particular artist or theme.

title: WBWC


text:
User talk:Pattsy~enwiki

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Pattsy. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Pattsy~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pattsy~enwiki


text:
User talk:Chirablack

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Chirablack


text:
User talk:Acunningham

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Acunningham


text:
User talk:KjRi

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:KjRi


text:
Rudolf Goldschmidt

Rudolf Goldschmidt (1876–1950) was a German engineer and inventor, best known for the development of the Goldschmidt alternator radio transmitter, and the tone wheel receiver.

Early life
Goldschmidt was born on March 19, 1876, in Neubukow, Mecklenburg, Germany, and grew up in that country. He studied engineering at Charlottenburg and Darmstadt Technical High School, and was awarded an electrical engineer degree at Technische Hochschule Darmstadt in January 1898. Beginning in 1899 he published numerous articles on various branches of electrical engineering. In 1900 he received a college and traveling scholarship, and visited engineering works in Belgium, England, and France. Later that year he was appointed engineer in the laboratory of the Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft AG (AEG) in Berlin. In 1901-1902 he was chief laboratory engineer and designer for Kolben and Company, Ltd., in Prague. He came to England in connection with the Willesden Electricity Supply Station, and was later appointed chief engineer to Crompton and Company in Chelmsford. In 1905 he joined the Westinghouse Company at Manchester.

After passing the German abitur-examination he was awarded an Engineering doctorate degree. In 1907 he returned to Germany as lecturer at Darmstadt Technical College, began working as a consulting engineer, and worked on several inventions, primarily with designing high-frequency alternator transmitters for radio-telegraphy. In 1911 he became manager of Hochfrequenz-Maschinen Aktiengesellschaft für drahtlose Telegraphie (HOMAG) in Berlin, a company formed to promote his radio inventions.

In 1905 Goldschmidt married journalist Hella Gimpel (1883–1933), sister of the painter Bruno Gimpel, and subsequently had three sons and a daughter.

Radio inventions
In 1908 he developed the Goldschmidt alternator, an early radio transmitter that employed rotating elements and was one of the first continuous wave transmitters. These were manufactured by the HOMAG company for use in high power longwave radio stations conducting intercontinental radiotelegraph traffic. Large 100-kilowatt Goldschmidt transmitters in Eilvese, Germany and Tuckerton, New Jersey, USA were used in the first direct communications link between Germany and the United States, which was inaugurated on 19 June 1914 with a ceremonial exchange of telegrams between Kaiser Wilhelm II and President Woodrow Wilson. Alternator radio transmitters were used into the 1920s, when they were replaced by vacuum tube transmitters.

He also invented the Goldschmidt tone wheel, a mechanical device used in early radio receivers to receive the new continuous wave signals. The first type of radio transmitter, the spark-gap transmitter, produced strings of damped waves that were heard as a buzz or tone in a receiver, so the radio wave pulses used to transmit Morse code were audible as "beeps". However, the unmodulated signals produced by early continuous wave (also known as "undamped") transmitters like the Goldschmidt alternator were inaudible in receivers designed for reception of spark transmissions. To make continuous wave signals audible, the tone wheel receiver used the heterodyne principle to convert the received transmission into an audio frequency tone.

The tone wheel was a disk with contacts around the rim, spun by a small electric motor, which interrupted the incoming radio signal at a slightly different radio frequency rate than the one used by the transmission. The tone wheel acted as a simple beat frequency oscillator (BFO), and its radio frequency, when combined with the received signal, created an audible "beat" (heterodyne) tone with a frequency that was the difference between the two rates. For example, if the transmitted frequency was 60,000 Hz, the tone wheel could be adjusted to 59,000 Hz, creating a 1,000 Hz tone which could be heard in the earphones as a musical "beep" whenever the carrier was present.

The tone wheel was used for a short period until the 1920s, when it was replaced by the vacuum tube regenerative receiver. Later the tone wheel was used as a musical tone generating device in early electronic organs.

Later life
During the 1920s, Goldschmidt directed an industrial research lab in Berlin. Here he met Albert Einstein. In 1928, a singer with whom the physicist was acquainted suffered a hearing loss, which set Einstein to thinking about hearing aids. Soon he had an idea and asked Goldschmidt to help him develop a working model. A German patent was issued to Goldschmidt and Einstein on 10 January 1934.

In 1934, Goldschmidt and his children emigrated to England. He kept up his correspondence with Einstein until his death in Bournemouth in 1950.

Other works cited

 * Appendix: Einstein's collaborators
 * «Rudolf Goldschmidt» (entry), in: 100 jüdische Persönlichkeiten aus Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: ein Begleiter zur Ausstellung des Max-Samuel-Hauses 22. Mai bis 22. November 2003, Max-Samuel-Haus, Stiftung Begegnungsstätte für Jüdische Geschichte und Kultur in Rostock [Rostock Jewish Heritage Centre] (ed.), Frank Schröder (1958-2004), Axel Attula, Christine Gundlach et al., (=Schriften aus dem Max-Samuel-Haus; vol. 4), Rostock: Weidner, 2003, pp. 65seq.

title: Rudolf Goldschmidt


text:
User talk:Michitomo

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Michitomo


text:
Talk:Sauk-Suiattle

Untitled
Contact information: Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 5318 Chief Brown Lane Darrington, Washington 98241 Main Office (360)436-0131

"Suiattle tribe" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suiattle_tribe&redirect=no Suiattle tribe] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. PersusjCP (talk) 01:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Sauk-Suiattle


text:
× Brassolaeliocattleya

× Brassolaeliocattleya, abbreviated Blc. in the horticultural trade, is the orchid nothogenus for intergeneric hybrid greges containing at least one ancestor species from each of the three ancestral genera Brassavola R.Br., Cattleya Lindl. and Laelia  Lindl. , and from no other genera.

Nomenclatural history
As the name was used in 1999, there were many greges which were among the most spectacular of cultivated orchids, being particularly valued for the large showy labellum. By 2009, the "Brassavola" parents most commonly used in producing × Brassolaeliocattleya hybrids had been moved into the genus Rhyncholaelia, and the "Laelia" parents most commonly used in producing × Brassolaeliocattleya hybrids had been moved into the genus Cattleya. As a result, most of the greges that were classified as × Brassolaeliocattleya in 1999 are now classified in the nothogenus × Rhyncholaeliocattleya, although others are now placed in several nothogenera:

title: × Brassolaeliocattleya


text:
User talk:Mpk15

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Mpk15


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8 1/2 by Eleven

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Deletion review nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ambiguous.

I have discounted the opinion of one "voter" whose contributions so far have almost exclusively been to AFD discussions and VfU discussions. I continue to find it improbable that a new user will so quickly find AFD and consider it more likely than not that this may be evidence of sockpuppetry.

The author of the webcomic raised several arguments in favor of the article but failed to persuade the other participants in the discussion. While the Alexa rank was not reported in this debate, my own research shows it to be very high. See here.

I am going to call this one as a "delete" decision but without prejudice against recreation if/when the webcomic achieves the recommended level of notability. Rossami (talk) 16:29, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

8 1/2 by Eleven
None notable webcomic, probably made in violation of WP:POINT by Jamie McGarry after a rather bitter afd debate at Articles_for_deletion/Able_and_Baker. The author of the webcomic is User:Tedzsee and participated in that debate, please take a look at the comments made. The article states no assertion of notability and google also gives hardly any relevent links to "8 1/2 by eleven", certainly no valid notability claims. - Hahnchen 17:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Just a comment... I agree with you that this comic is not particularly notable, unless you're looking at Alexa rankings as the only sign of notability (which is a big if, given past votes in this community). However, one thing I'd like to point out is the following (and keep it in mind that I am not asking this in a confrontational way, despite the tone of the question... I am simply curious): since when are articles supposed to establish or prove notability? Articles should document a notable subject, but they should not exist simply to prove that subject is notable.  Check out this particularly pathetic webcomics stub for example.  Now, I think this comic is notable, but the article certainly doesn't do a very good job "establishing" it.  Should the stub be deleted just because of that? No. The article should be left and added to over time.  Anyways, just a thought.  I'd be interested in your response if you want to reply on my talk page or here (although here might clutter up the AfD a bit). --Tedzsee 06:44, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Hey Hahnchen! Just wandering around the deletion pages and noticed my comic was up for deletion. I didn't know an article had been created about my comic at all. As it's my comic, I'm not going to vote or defend it vehemenently. I will, however, make the following points for others to consider. Please note that these points will argue both for and against the notability of this comic:
 * Abstain: seems to be somewhat popular but may not be notable.  [[Image:Smilie.gif|20px]] Molotov [[Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif|25px]]   (talk)
 * Delete possibly redirect to paper as it's a standard US paper size. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 20:45, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain:
 * arguing that this comic is notable: The assertion by the nominator that Google does not give any relevant links to "8 1/2 by Eleven" is incorrect. The first hit on a Google search for "8 1/2 by Eleven" results in this comic appearing, a search for "8 1/2 by Eleven comic" shows several pages of relevant hits, and a search for "Lucas Teodoro da Silva" (in quote marks) returns three pages of links about this author.  The search "8 1/2 x 11" points to the US standard paper size.
 * arguing that this comic is notable: the Alexa rating for this site is 346,728. While this is below WP:COMIC's required rating of 200,000, it is better than recently deleted comics like Able and Baker (Alexa:1,117,031) and Built for Comfort (Alexa:2,235,134) by a significant margin.
 * arguing that this comic is notable: The author of this comic, Lucas TdS, is one of the administrators of Comixpedia.org, a growing online resource about webcomics. This site does have the an Alexa rating of better than 200,000.
 * arguing that this comic is not notable: The article does' seem to have been created in response to a sarcastic comment I made in a deletion debate arguing that it would be difficult to delete this article based on this comic's popularity. The creation of this article probably violates WP:POINT.  Please note, however, that I had nothing to do with the creation of this article by its said author and did not instigate its creation on purpose!!!
 * arguing that this comic is notable: Comic has a deep archive (219 strips) and a year-and-a-half publishing steady 5 days a week (it has not missed a day).
 * arguing that this comic is not notable: Molotov's assertion is probably the closest to fact -- the comic is popular in terms of raw readership numbers and Alexa numbers (more popular than some other Wikipedia-documented webcomics, but is not mentioned by any comic critique sites, probably because of its relative newness to the comic scene (only a year in print). However, this would suggest a lack of notability within the webcomics community, despite its relatively high readership numbers on the net itself.
 * General Comment regarding the idea to redirect to US standard paper size. As the comic title is written out half in numerical (8 1/2) and half in regular english (eleven).  I would suggest that a redirect for this article to the article on US standard papersize is a bad idea for two reasons:
 * If someone came here looking for the comic and was redirected to the article on paper size, they may get confused.
 * No one is going to type in "8 1/2 by Eleven" when they are looking for "8 1/2 x 11"... would you suggest we create a redirect for "Eight and a half by Eleven?" No.
 * At some point in the future, this comic may gain notability. Its readership numbers and Alexa ranking are already almost high enough to warrant a Wikipedia entry.  At that point, having a redirect would be terribly inconvenient and confusing.
 * General Comment regarding the article itself: except for the picture, this article is a copy of an article found at, which may be a more appropriate venue for such an article.
 * General Comment regarding the assertion that the article not giving links to the website is grounds for deletion: obviously the article would need to be improved if that was the case, however that hardly qualifies as a reason for deltion.

--Tedzsee 21:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC) '''I've deleted a few of my comments because I figure that if I say I'm going to stay out of the debate, I should actually not comment any further. You can look at the history if you REALLY want to see what I wrote.''' --Tedzsee 17:20, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Tedzsee: "However, this would suggest a lack of notability within the webcomics community, despite its relatively high readership numbers on the net itself." This, I believe, is the key thing here -- it just hasn't made enough of an impact (not yet, anyway; obviously, I have nothing but good wishes on that front). Delete. -- Captain Disdain 00:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment The above comments seem to indicate that the comic is an up and comer on the webcomic scene. The article is factually sound and I am normally reluctant to vote delete on articles where notability is arguable. I agree with Tedzsee above that it is not the job of an article to prove notability; however, it is the job of supporters in an afd debate to do so.  As such, Iwould like to see the arguments of an objective party for the notability of the subject.  Until then, I, personally, can reach no decision.  Cool3 20:19, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep OK, I know I'm not neutral. This one's going quite well though, so I thought I'd better show my face!  The fact is, there's no guidlines for webcomics on wiki other than Alexa, so this should probably be kept. -- Hijamiefans

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:King Mike

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Image copyright problem with Image:Guitar_induction.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Guitar_induction.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 11:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:King Mike


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Outer Circle

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Deletion review nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete — the vote fell 6:4 delete, but I note that 3 of those voting keep were unsigned anons. Whereas I believe that anyone can vote here, I also believe that this process is about community consensus, and that such unsigned votes, while noted, do not express any wish to collaborate on building Wikipedia. --Gareth Hughes 21:51, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

The Outer Circle
Non notable comic, found here. Article does not mention any sort of notability apart from existing. A google search for its creator "Steve Napierski" gives just over 40 links. A google search for "The Outer Circle" webcomic, gives 60 links. Please, webcomics should assert their own notability, other than passing the stupidly lax proposed guidelines at WP:COMIC - Hahnchen 17:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable - at least not yet. -DDerby- (talk) 04:00, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, see User:SCZenz/Webcomics. But there's no need to use insulting language, even for criteria you disagree with, Hahnchen! -- SCZenz 15:57, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable-Dakota 16:18, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Maybe not notable for its fanbase, but the comic itself is notable for being well written and well drawn. Steve Napierski is an excellent webcomic creator, and this entry deserves to be here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.197.54.142 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Since I actually do the comic, I doubt I would ask for it to be deleted. Here's a few of my points for it not to be deleted... Granted, "The Outer Circle" is not as large as Penny Arcade or PvP, the comic does update daily and has over 225 comics in it's archives.  The comic has been reviewed by Digital Strips and Steve Napierski/I actively work on The Webcomic List.  Also, "The Outer Circle" does rank under Alexa traffic details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.180.38.20 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 18 October 2005  (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Mozan-True, the comic hasn't been around very long, but that doesn't mean it does not deserve recognition. If a great man were to rise to power very quickly, would he not be celebrated?And if a great comic were to rise to fame, would IT not be celebrated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.170.172 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete No harm in having it. As for the google search...how common a last name is Napierski anyway? And how common is it to be paired with "Steve"? Adding quotes doesn't help any. - Donny
 * A Collective Reply - It doesn't matter how well written or well drawn a comic is. There are many well written blogs out there, many well drawn personal art sites out there, that is not an instant assertion of notability.  Just because a comic has x00 strips, also does not make it notable, a long running ignored website is the same as a new ignored website.  It fails the Alexa ranking test, but I've not even been using them for a while, because barely mentioning it as circumstantial evidence leads a a horde of straw man arguments claiming Alexa is the only grounds.  If a great man were to rise to power very quickly, he would have an article.  Has the outer circle had a great rise to fame?  I don't think so.  And the whole point is, that "Steve Napierski" is a relatively unique name is where Google can help.  If his name were John Doe, then the search would be absolutely useless.  And to reply to the post on the author's site, no, I am not against webcomics being listed on Wikipedia, I am however, against every webcomic entity listed on the encyclopedia just because their fans think it deserves one. - Hahnchen 13:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * ...and thus the Hahnchen did prowl the Wiki, looking for unworthy webcomics to delete, never giving a thought that he has too much free time on his hands mayhap. -Donny
 * Hahnchen is trying to maintain consistency of our standards for notable vs. non-notable websites in our encyclopedia. He has an area of focus, yes, but it's work somebody has to do.  Your objections indicate that you don't really understand the purpose of Wikipedia, which means you might want to think twice before claiming experienced editors are wrongly nominating articles for deletion.  In my vote above, I put a link to my thoughts on this issue that may help you understand what's going on, if you're interested. (Also, you might want to be aware that linking to your own commercial website in an AfD could be considered advertizing, although I imagine you're just using it for identification purposes.) -- SCZenz 23:17, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, I suppose what I said was un-called for. Almost as uncalled for as implying that someone's Wiki entry is stupid. The problem with a webcomics area is that it comes down to a matter of opinion of what is and isn't notable. Is it hits? Money made? Popularity? Granted, it could be argued that the latter crieria goes hand in hand with hits but there are plenty of lousy sites that rake in tons of traffic. Likewise there are quality sites that haven't yet made it big. The outer circle is one of those sites, yet it IS on people's radars. Waiting until its at Penny Arcade's level of noteriety before its included is just wrong. - Donny
 * I have a list of reasons a webcomic might be notable at User:SCZenz/Webcomics. We should use any verifiable evidence of notability--but "on peoples' radars" is a little vague, as that goes.  We need things that are quantifiable precisely because Wikipedia editors aren't qualified to judge the quality of webcomics!
 * The webcomic community seems to misunderstand what the Wikipedia community is about. We're now being insulted on webcomics' daily news, people are voting in AfD's without reading any of the relevant procedures, and webcomic-lovers are feeling hurt when we say that their website is non-encyclopediaic.  When we say "non-notable" we don't mean that it's not notable for a webcomic; we mean that it isn't visible enough in other sources to be put in an encyclopedia.  Wikipedia is not the place for webcomics (even high-quality ones that are underregarded on other pages) to increase their visibility.  -- SCZenz 00:31, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't think Hahnchen said that "someone's Wiki entry is stupid," at least not anywhere I've seen--he said a set of proposed guidelines were "stupidly lax," and you'll see above that I objected immediately. Please bear in mind, too, that a wikipedia article on a person, website, or anything else isn't that person's entry; it's the encyclopedia's entry about that person.  (Maybe that's just a comment on imprecise wording, but it is and important idea.) -- SCZenz 01:01, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Thanks for that Donny, yet more character assassination from the lovable webcomic community. I just feel that webcomics should have some verifiable assertion of notability.  Merely being on people's radar is just not a real point.  The thing with webcomics, is that even the smallest have a core group of vocal loyal online fans, but just because of this it doesn't mean it's any more notable than any other website.  The same is true for forums, websites and blogs.  It's not that the Wiki entry is stupid, but I believe that wiki should not just be used as a collection of all information about anything that has ever existed.  And the reaction from some parts of the webcomic community is quite frankly, ridiculous.  Some seem to think that their webcomic inherently deserves a wikipedia article, just because it exists and Megatokyo has one.  And that without a wikipedia article, it makes their comic look small, bad, and not as good as Triangle and Robert. - Hahnchen 15:16, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, as per nom. Also, someone pointed to the site's Alexa rank as a reasoning behind their "don't delete" vote -- without mentioning that the Alexa rank is 654,834. Dragonfiend 05:20, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. --Aquillion 20:13, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

authors: ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bored and Evil

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 02:35, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Bored and Evil
Non notable webcomic, found here. It's forums can be found here, with a massive 54 members, split between 5 different comics. No assertion of notability either in the article, or could be found on google. - Hahnchen 17:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep apparently somewhat notable.  [[Image:Smilie.gif|20px]] Molotov  [[Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif|25px]]   (talk)
 * Hello? Please try a more restrictive google search, and have a look at the actual links.  Most are webcomic crosslinking.  There have been no major coverage by any respected (even in the webcomic world) journals/magazines/newspapers.  Was your keep vote based purely on the google search?  What makes this website stand out from all the other websites out there? - Hahnchen 18:16, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Instead of jumping to conclusions, and insinuate that my vote was based only on technicality (which you have no way of knowing) let us just wait for more votes to come in. I may be wrong - you may be wrong, time will tell us. Thanks : ).  [[Image:Smilie.gif|20px]] Molotov  [[Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif|25px]]   (talk)
 * Easy tiger. You need to put speech marks around it, or Google searches for every instance of each of the words "bored" "evil". It's not surprising that there are millions of such instances. It's not unreasonable to suppose that your reasoning is based on the Google search you conducted since you offer no other justification. If you were thinking other things but didn't write them down, people aren't going to be able to guess. -Splash talk 21:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

 * please stop playing Devil's advocate every time I vote "keep" on an article. I am not trying to get into debate, I am only trying to address my opinion - which I think should be plausible without comments under what I am saying to tell me that I am wrong. I respect your opinions, but somethings are a little too serious.  I vote delete on most articles, and I think I have enough decision making capacity to vote yes or no.  Again, thanks...but sometimes, no thanks. Plus that, I was concentrating more on Google hits that were obviously related to the topic...which I thought was others would obviously do because the rest are pretty irrelevant.  Thanks.  Also note that the first hits dealt with the topic at hand. [[Image:Smilie.gif|20px]] Molotov   (talk)  [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]]   23:56, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

what?
 * I'd have replied sooner, but have cut down time from the wiki.  I just thought that the external link you gave was your justification of keeping.   Apologies if you took offence, happy editing. - Hahnchen 13:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The correct Google search gives 127 useful hits, and a substanital proportion of them do not apply. Alexa rank is off the bottom of the scale. Since there appears to be no reliable third-party sources in amongst the Googles, there is no reason to suppose this has any influence outside it's small sphere. -Splash talk 21:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable webcomic fails google and Alexa tests. Dragonfiend 22:28, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just isn't notable enough in any way that I can see. -- Captain Disdain 00:54, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Changed my vote after some reserch, now seems not notable! Bwfc 12:36, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * how do u delete an artacle
 * I would think the admin will delete this and any other articles Vfd'd. Bwfc 23:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete after thorough review of the article, I change my vote. I still don't like being argued with constantly for every opinion I have on this site.  [[Image:Smilie.gif|20px]] Molotov   (talk)  [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]]   00:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. Xoloz 12:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
The New Century Family Money Book

The New Century Family Money Book is a 1993 financial security self-help book by Jonathan D. Pond. It was first published on March 1, 1993, through Dell Publishing and covers topics such as home ownership, college, investing, careers, insurance, retirement, and income tax and estate planning.

The Chicago Sun-Times gave a positive review of the book upon its release and noted that it "covers every personal and family financial concern from basic investing to college aid formulas".

title: The New Century Family Money Book


text:
User talk:Life enjoy

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Life enjoy


text:
List of famines

This is a non-exhaustive list of famines.

Main article lists

 * Bengal famine
 * Droughts and famines in Russia and the Soviet Union
 * Famine in India
 * Famines in the Czech lands
 * Famines in Ethiopia
 * Great Bengal famine of 1770
 * Great Famine of 1876–1878
 * Great Chinese Famine
 * Holodomor
 * List of famines in China
 * North Korean famine
 * Timeline of major famines in India during British rule

Other articles

 * 2007–2008 world food price crisis
 * 2010–2012 world food price crisis
 * 2022–2023 food crises
 * Disaster
 * Famine Early Warning Systems Network
 * Famine events
 * Famine relief
 * Famine scales
 * Food security
 * Food security during the COVID-19 pandemic
 * List of natural disasters by death toll
 * List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll
 * Live Aid
 * Medieval demography
 * Population decline
 * Potato famine
 * Starvation
 * Theories of famines
 * World population

title: List of famines


text:
× Cattleytonia

× Cattleytonia (from Cattleya and Broughtonia, its parental genera) is an intergeneric hybrid of orchids. It is abbreviated Ctna in horticultural trade.

title: × Cattleytonia


text:
User talk:Californialove

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:07, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Californialove


text: User talk:70.176.232.47

title: User talk:70.176.232.47


text:
User talk:Piyushswaroop

A welcome from Sango123
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango  123  17:07, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

title: User talk:Piyushswaroop


text:
× Epicattleya

× Epicattleya (from Cattleya and Epidendrum, its parent genera) is an intergeneric orchid hybrid. The nothogenus is abbreviated Epc. in the horticultural trade.

title: × Epicattleya