text:
BrainBounce!

BrainBounce! was produced by Megafun Productions and aired on TV Ontario from 2001 to 2004. It currently airs on Discovery Kids in the UK. The series was shot in Montreal and Toronto as a "piggyback" production: the original French version, Le Monde a la Loupe (hosted by Stéphanie Allaire) was shot at the same time in each location.

Each episode begins in an "ordinary" place - a camp site, a dance studio, a movie theatre - and jumps into one fantasy world after another as more questions are discovered. Some have described the show as "stream-of-consciousness" or "encyclopedia" television. Subjects such as art, music, science, animals, the human body are explored by way of sketches, interviews with guest experts, experiments and mini-documentaries.

Content
Julie Zwillich plays herself as the main host of the show, and also plays most of the characters who appear in her "brainbounces". Zwillich also wrote the lyrics for and sings the theme song at the beginning of the show.

Characters

 * Elsa Fullbrain
 * Pabla Picante
 * Salvador Dalí (voice)
 * Giant Stick of Gum
 * Barry Metric
 * Pain (Cavity)
 * Scott McScotia
 * Connie Contatious
 * Cow (voice)
 * Chanel the Skunk (voice)
 * Farm Dog (voice)
 * Silent Film Starlet
 * Kathleen Kleen
 * Bedouin
 * Alien (voice)

Episodes

 * The Cemetery
 * The Street Busker
 * The Cinema
 * The Cliff
 * The Pool
 * The Apartment
 * The Farm
 * The Video Store
 * The Dance Class
 * The Shopping Center
 * The Dentist
 * The Supermarket
 * The Campsite

title: BrainBounce!


text:
Jimmy Creighton

James Albert Creighton (November 18, 1905 – May 29, 1990) was an ice hockey player and politician from Brandon, Manitoba.

Creighton played eleven games in the National Hockey League with the Detroit Falcons in 1931, scoring one goal and receiving one minor penalty. He was traded to the New York Americans in December 1931, but never played for the team. He later worked in the IHL and the Can-Am Leagues. Creighton became a professional hockey referee after retiring as a player, and later worked as a general insurance salesman.

He served as an alderman in Brandon in 1946, 1948 and 1949, and was mayor of the city from 1952 to 1955 and from 1958 to 1961.

Creighton won the Liberal-Progressive nomination for Brandon City in the 1953 provincial election, defeating W.A. Wood and J.C. MacDonald at a contested meeting. He lost to Progressive Conservative candidate Reginald Lissaman in the general election, receiving 3,063 votes (40.13%) on the first count and losing on the second. Provincial elections in Manitoba were conducted by the single transferable ballot in this period.

Later in the same year, Creighton ran for the House of Commons of Canada in the 1953 federal election as a Liberal candidate in Brandon—Souris. He received 8,456 votes, and finished second to Progressive Conservative Walter Dinsdale. He ran for the Manitoba legislature a second time in the 1962, and lost to Lissaman again.

He suffered from Parkinson's disease in his later years, and was eventually confined to a nursing home prior to his death in 1990.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Jimmy Creighton


text: User:Nmulder

title: User:Nmulder


text:
User talk:Yukihime~enwiki

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:35, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Yukihime. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Yukihime~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 04:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yukihime~enwiki


text:
User talk:Pbussey

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:36, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pbussey


text:
Jeffries Fan Club

Jeffries Fan Club was a southern California Third-wave ska band formed in 1996. The band released several albums on now-defunct Vegas Records before breaking up in 2001. The band played their final show January 6, 2001, at The Glasshouse in Pomona, which was later released on CD under the title Last Show at the Glasshouse. Their breakup was the cover story in the OC Weekly issue dated January 5, 2001. In the OC Weekly article, it was revealed that the primary reason for the band's breakup was lead singer/guitarist Mike Dziurgot's desire to return to school. In the article, he also mentioned that he and several of the members didn't enjoy performing unless they were under the influence of alcohol, and that this affliction had prompted him to return to his Christian roots.

The band played a reunion show at the House of Blues in Anaheim on November 9, 2002. The band also reunited for two "anniversary" shows, celebrating 10 years since the band was formed, at Chain Reaction on April 14 and April 15, 2006.

In 2003, the band was featured on OC Weekly's list of "The 129 Greatest OC Bands Ever" at No. 96.

Final lineup

 * Mike Dziurgot - lead vocals & guitar
 * Chris Colonnier - trombone & vocals
 * Tim Carpenter - guitar
 * Justin Ferreira - drums
 * Derek Gibbs - bass
 * Steve Tucker - trumpet

Previous members

 * Sonnie Johnston - guitar
 * Chris Rush - trumpet

Post-breakup

 * After the band's breakup, Mike Dziurgot attended Fullerton College where he majored in journalism.
 * In 2016 Mike Dziurgot became involved in a new project entitled The Dream Gypsies. Mike Dziurgot became a co-songwriter, lead singer and rhythm guitarist for the project. The first album, The Analogue Chronicles, has a scheduled release date of June 2017.
 * From 2001 to 2005, Derek Gibbs, Chris Colonnier, and Justin Ferreira were members of The Forces of Evil, a band fronted by Reel Big Fish's Aaron Barrett.
 * Justin Ferreira also played drums in Reel Big Fish from 2003 to 2005 and appears on the band's 2005 album We're Not Happy 'Til You're Not Happy. He left the band before the album's release to focus on his new band, Takota.  As a result, he is only listed in the album credits as an "additional musician."
 * Derek Gibbs joined Reel Big Fish in June 2007, replacing the band's original bassist, Matt Wong.
 * Sonnie Johnston joined Five Iron Frenzy, replacing guitarist Scott Kerr. He remained with them through to their 2003 hiatus, and remains a member in their 2012-present reformation.
 * Tim Carpenter became a successful Architectural and Wedding Photographer.

Discography

 * Feelin' Sorry...For All The Hearts We've Broken (1997)
 * Nothing To Prove (1998)
 * Invisible Tank Slow Gherkin/Jeffries Fan Club split (1998)
 * JFC Sucks: The Early Years (1999)
 * Changing the Nation (2000)
 * JFC Live! (2000) Live album
 * Last Show at the Glasshouse (2001) - Live album

title: Jeffries Fan Club


text:
User talk:Lil Peck

Glad to have you back with us. I saw your outline of Horse Training, and that you signed up for the WikiProject. Please join the discussion page! Uncle Ed 01:36, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

NPOV
I need a bit more to go on. What is the user name we are dealing with and which pages are the primary problems? (You can use the email feature if you don't want to name names here.) Montanabw (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

I'll dig a bit. I found one place. Yeah, I agree with you, commercial self-promotion is a violation of wikipedia guidelines. Revert away, I'll do so as well where I spot stuff. Montanabw (talk) 19:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Though, with 500 articles on my watchlist, you ARE on your own when it comes to Monty Roberts! (grin).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montanabw (talk • contribs) 19:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

 * I agree with you about Monty. We have the same problem with the Parelli article. Good to see you back, by the way!    Montanabw (talk) 00:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

 * I found the link to information about cults, on the Parelli page, to be apropos.

Lil (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Thanks! (I found it)   Montanabw (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello I am writing an article for my college english class on cutting and was wondering if you could look over my article and give me some suggestions on how to improve it? Thank you!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jport13/sandbox Jport13 (talk) 20:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Horse Whispers and Lies
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Horse Whispers and Lies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern:
 * This book is not notable and may be self-published. A Google News Archive search indicates no reviews in the media and a regular Google Web search turns up just 69 independent hits

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:The-invester_318x264.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The-invester_318x264.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 13:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lil Peck


text:
User talk:Saada

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:36, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saada


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin "Knife" Sotelo

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Marvin "Knife" Sotelo
Probable vanity page; Minimal community benefit Cpaliga 01:36, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * It is important to note that he does have a self-published book seems to be a leader in a religous organization. I do not however think that every person who leads a church deserves a Wikipedia Page.Cpaliga
 * Also, Please go to the Cultural Reference articles, many of them have been marked for deletion.Cpaliga 14:11, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete -- unsalvageable POV, and seemingly non-notable subject --Mysidia (talk) 02:19, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable MONGO 05:58, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. Cultural references are crap and the articles written on them mainly created by the article writer, HTSMVKNIFE, except, obviously, for Anton LaVey. --Last Malthusian 13:43, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity and nn-bio.--Isotope23 18:34, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Leave it up... DO NOT DELETE!!!

 * Why does this article want to be deleted?, its actually pretty good. Leave it up why not!
 * If you'd like to know "why not," look at all of the previous comments explaining the reasons. Cpaliga

awesome article

it passes in my book

WHOA O.O VERY INTERESTING READ

 * nice just needs a little more info
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text: Category:Economy of Slovakia

title: Category:Economy of Slovakia


text:
User talk:Whiteelk119\

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:37, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Whiteelk119\


text:
Yasutora Sado

Yasutora Sado (茶渡 泰虎) is a fictional character in the Japanese manga and anime series Bleach created by Tite Kubo. He is also one of Ichigo Kurosaki's friends. Because Ichigo first read Yasutora's name off a nametag, he pronounced his family name as Chad (チャド) due to the variable pronunciations of kanji, and Ichigo continues to call him this throughout the story.

Conception and development
Kubo stated that he began creating the characters "from their faces." According to Kubo, Chad "looked like he was of Mexican heritage" so he decided to make him half-Japanese and half-Mexican.

Personality
Chad is a tall teenager of Japanese and Mexican descent, and appears to be older than he really is. He has a tattoo on his left shoulder that consists of a winged heart and a snake, with a ribbon that reads 'Amore e Morte' ("love and death" in Italian) and has a very big mouth. During his early years, Chad was extremely violent. Exploiting his advantage in size, he intimidated and hit any child who annoyed him. Oscar Joaquin de la Rosa, his grandfather, 'Abuelo' inspired Chad to be gentle. Afterwards, Oscar gave Chad an old Mexican coin, which he treasured after Oscar's death. Since then, Chad vowed that he would never fight unless it was to protect others, as instructed — even if his own life was in danger. However, because of his constant involvement with gangs, Chad gained a reputation as a ruthless gangster.

Chad is a quiet person with a very kind heart and is sometimes the subject of jokes or bullies because he never fights back, against ordinary humans, or often hollows and Soul Reapers until necessary. Nonetheless, he is treated equally within his group of friends in Karakura (Ichigo, Keigo and Mizuiro). As he and Ichigo have a longtime relationship, having met each other while fighting off a group of bullies. Since then both decided to fight together, Chad becomes determined to train and get stronger in order to aid Ichigo in his fights as Ichigo and his enemies start becoming much stronger than Chad along the series. Chad also has a weakness for cute things, like small animals and Kon, and is one of the few characters that actually treats Kon with any dignity but for the most part ignores him. In a recent omake, when Orihime is trying to catch Nozomi with a plush cat, she captures Chad instead, who begins to cuddle with it. Besides his physical strength being able to lift 400 kg with ease, Chad has also shown to be very intelligent; he ranked 11th out of 322 in school, while Ichigo is ranked 23rd.

Abilities
When first introduced, Chad had no special powers aside from his unusual strength and endurance. After his encounter with the cockateel containing the soul of Yūichi Shibata, he starts to detect the approximate locations of spirits and hollows, but cannot fully see them. Only after saving Karin Kurosaki from a hollow, during the hollow-slaying match between Uryū and Ichigo, does Chad begin to fully see spirits. This also awakens what Chad later learns to be his latent powers as a Fullbringer, a human who manipulates the soul of an object to its full potential as the result of absorbing residual spirit pressure from a Hollow while unborn. Having been raised by his grandfather to take pride in his skin and Mexican heritage, Chad's Fullbring manifests on his body in the form of armor on his right arm called the Brazo Derecho [sic] del Gigante. Chad's armor increases his strength beyond its already impressive level, and enables him to fire powerful energy blasts from his fist. After training with Renji, Chad gains an improved version of his armored arm. He also gains a new special attack called El Directo To perform it, the flanges on Chad's arm open up and he punches the enemy.

While in Hueco Mundo, stating that his powers are closer to that of a hollow, Chad's Fullbring is strengthened by the environment to the point of manifesting armor on both arms instead of just his right. In addition, he also gains the ability to move at high speeds in a manner similar to flash steps and sonido. Chad's full-powered right arm is still called the Brazo Derecha de Gigante but is now used for defense instead of offense (though it's still more powerful offensively than his original arm). Brazo Derecha de Gigante becomes a shield that extends from his hand to some distance beyond his forearm with the same intricate pattern as before. Chad's armored left arm, used for attack, is known as the Brazo Izquierda [sic] del Diablo. With this arm, Chad gains a special attack known as La Muerte, a powerful fist containing energy from all his fingers.

Plot overview
A few days after Ichigo becomes a Soul Reaper, Chad accepts a cursed cockatiel whose previous owners have all died horrible deaths. The bird is in fact the container for the spirit of a dead child, Yuichi Shibata, placed there by a hollow who uses him as bait. Chad is forced to fight the hollow despite not being able to see it, assisted by Rukia Kuchiki. Ichigo defeats the hollow then performs Konso on Yuichi. Later on, when Uryū Ishida's duel with Ichigo unleashes a multitude of hollows upon the town, Chad is pressed into battle with another hollow. It is this event that awakens his spiritual powers, which manifest as armor on his right arm.

After Rukia is taken back to Soul Society, Chad and Orihime Inoue are trained by Yoruichi Shihouin to consciously call upon their powers when needed. After a week, Chad leaves for Soul Society with Orihime, Uryū, Yoruichi, and Ichigo. When the group is separated once entering Seireitei, Chad ends up alone. Chad meets his match in Shunsui Kyōraku, captain of the 8th Division in the Gotei 13. Kyōraku easily beats Chad, leaving him heavily injured but alive. After being freed by Kenpachi Zaraki of the 11th Division and Rukia is rescued, Uryū, Chad, Ichigo and Orihime depart for the living world. In Karakura Town, Ichigo, Chad and Orihime are attacked by Ulquiorra Schiffer and Yammy Riyalgo, two of the first arrancars to invade Karakura Town. When the second invasion led by the Espada Grimmjow Jeagerjaques commences, Chad is attacked by an arrancar but is saved by Ichigo. Noting that he is unable to fight alongside Ichigo, Chad turns to Kisuke Urahara for help, asking for training.

After Orihime is captured by Sōsuke Aizen, Chad joins Ichigo and his friends to rescue her from Hueco Mundo. After making their way to Las Noches and the group splits up, Chad runs into the Privaron Espada Gantenbainne Mosqueda. His victory is short-lived, however, as the 5th Espada, Nnoitora Jiruga, severely wounds him and leaves him for dead. Chad and Gantenbainne are eventually found by the Exequias, who plan to finish them off, but Retsu Unohana and Isane Kotetsu interrupt, and the former heals him. He later appears with Rukia and Renji to aid Ichigo and fight off the Exequias, but is defeated by the Cero Espada Yammy.

Seventeen months later, Chad appears as an ally of Xcution, a group of humans with supernatural powers called Fullbring. Having learned that he is a Fullbringer himself, Chad agrees to help restore Ichigo's Soul Reaper abilities for Xcution's needs. However, unaware that Xcution was using him for their plan to attack the Soul Society, Chad is attacked by Shūkurō Tsukishima and falls under the influence of his Fullbring to serve as an enforcer. But when he and Orihime experience a mental breakdown after Tsukishima attempts to "add" more details to their fake memories, Chad is knocked out by Urahara and Isshin before his mind is restored after Tsukishima's eventual death. Not too long afterwards, Chad accompanies his friends (sans Uryu) to Hueco Mundo in order to save the Arrancars from the Wandenreich. When Ichigo departs to assist the Soul Society against the Wandenreich invasion, Chad, Orihime and Urahara are grievously injured by Quilge Opie and fall to his arrows. They are then saved when Opie is killed by Grimmjow, whom they later join forces with.

Ten years later, Chad is now a professional boxer and challenger to the WBO World Heavyweight Title.

Reception
Readers from the manga have liked Chad's character, with him appearing in the characters popularity polls from Bleach. In the first poll he ranked 6th with 2,109 votes. However, in following polls he did not appear in the top ten, being replaced by other characters. His character has also been featured in several types of merchandising from Bleach such as action figures, key chains and plush.

Various publications from manga, anime and other media have commented on Chad's character, adding praise and criticism. Popcultureshock.com writer Carlos Alexandre praised his character as, like each character, he is very convincing and particularly liked his pacifist attitude despite his appearance. Carlo Santos from Anime News Network (ANN) agreed on this although he found his visual design to be stereotypical, but his personality was unique. Jarred Pine from Mania Entertainment found Chad's reveal of spiritual powers as his favourite from volume 5 of the manga, additionally noting that it does not drag out the story. He also praised how Chad teams up with Ichigo's sister, Karin, in order to fight an attacking Hollow. However, Carl Kimlinger from ANN noted this not to be very surprising for viewers if they have watched other series based on manga from Weekly Shōnen Jump as it is common theme in those series. Bryce Coulter from Mania praised Chad's fight against Shunsui Kyoraku, noting his pacifist attitude along with Shunsui's as well as his flashback which intensifies his friendship with Ichigo. Jian DeLeon of Complex magazine named him tenth on a list of "The 25 Most Stylish Anime Characters," and stated, "Sado gets this spot because of his amazing burgundy motorcycle jacket. He's also not afraid to rock cream-colored pants, nor does he stray from patterned shirts."

title: Yasutora Sado


text:
User talk:Rankor

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:37, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rankor


text:
Mary Early

Mary Early (born 1975) is an American sculptor. Some of her work is made using beeswax and wood.

Early was born in 1975 in Washington, DC. She studied at Bennington College. Her work had been exhibited at the American University Museum, Corcoran Gallery of Art, United States Botanic Garden, and the Washington Project for the Arts. She has also exhibited internationally in Austria and Germany. Early was commissioned to create a piece for the U.S. State Department Art in Embassies program which was installed in the United States Embassy in Amman, Jordan in 2018. Early is the director of Hemphill Fine Arts.

title: Mary Early


text:
Oscar (Irish mythology)

Oscar (oscara = "deer/god friend") is a figure in the Fenian Cycle of Irish mythology. He is the son of Oisín (the son of the epic hero Fionn mac Cumhail) and Niamh, and the brother of Plúr na mBan and Finn, his bride is called Malvina. Though possibly a later addition to the cycle, Oscar was a popular character, and appeared prominently in several later Fenian tales, serving his grandfather as one of the fianna.

In Bruidhean Chaorthainn (Fairy Palace of the Quicken Trees), Oscar swept off the head of Sinsar, the King of the World, in the battle on the ford of the Shannon River.

His death is described in the story Cath Gabhra (The Battle of Gabhra), which pits the increasingly corrupt Fianna against the Army of the High King of Ireland, Cairbre Lifechair. Cairbre, aided by defected Fianna warriors loyal to Goll mac Morna, receives his death blow from Oscar, but mortally wounds him with his steel chains as his final act. Oscar's death causes Fionn to weep for the only time in his life, and serves as the final blow to the Fianna's strength.

Namesake
Oisín had a second son who was named Oscar, born between him and Niamh in Tir na nÓg. Together the couple had three children, the other son who was named Finn, and a daughter named Plor na mBan. The account occurs in the poem, "The Lay of Oisin on the Land of the Young", attributed to Mícheál Coimín in the 18th century.

title: Oscar (Irish mythology)


text:
Kincardine power station

Kincardine power station was a 760 MW coal-fired power station on the shores of the upper Firth of Forth by Kincardine on Forth, Fife, Scotland.

History
The station began construction in 1952 and started generating electricity in 1958. At the time of its opening it was the largest power station in Scotland. It was initially operated by the South of Scotland Electricity Board (SSEB). The station was constructed to take advantage of post-WW2 expansion of the Fife and Lothian coalfields. Coal was supplied by Merry-go-round trains. It was capable of generating 760 MW peak load, and when commissioned could produce up to one third of Scotland's total electricity needs.

Specification
Kincardine power station had one of the first 120 MW turbo-alternator units in the UK (the first to be commissioned was at Blyth A). The first set at Kincardine was commissioned on 28 December 1958. The steam conditions at the turbine stop valve were 1,500 psi and 1,000 °F with reheat to 1,000 °F (103.4 bar and 538 °C). An even more advanced 200 MW set was installed at Kincardine in the 1962. This included boilers rated at 1,350,000 lb/h (170.1 kg/s) capacity delivering steam at 2,350 psi and 1,050 °F (162 bar and 566 °C) with reheat to 1,000 °F. The boilers were by John Brown Land Boilers Limited.

The architect was Robert Matthew and the consulting engineers were Kennedy and Donkin.

Operations
The station was formally opened by the Queen in October 1960. The station had cost £36,250,000, about £4M less than had been estimated in 1955. Upon opening it had three 120 MW units, 200 MW units were added in 1962 and 1963.

Water for the steam condensers was abstracted from and returned to the Forth. When fully commissioned the station drew 1,025 cubic feet per second (29.02 m3/s) of cooling water. There were concerns about the re-circulation of discharged warm water back into the intake. The topography of the river was modelled which demonstrated that re-circulation would not be significant and the length of the culvert could be reduced.

Ash from the boilers was used to reclaim land from the estuary held behind a 9,000 ft (2743 m) embankment.

Early in the operational life of the station it was found that aluminium brass condenser tubes were failing through corrosion. Research indicated the absence of a protective iron oxide film on the condenser tubes at Kincardine. A program to inject ferrous sulphate into the cooling water was instigated to provide iron to aid the formation of an oxide film.

Semi-automatic start up, loading and shutdown of generating sets was introduced at Kincardine in June 1966. This was associated with the change in the operation of the station from base load to two-shift working. This was the first time that such control has been used in the UK.

The rail facilities at Kincardine included five coal discharge filler pits including two tipplers, 8 railway sidings, an oil discharge facility, and a loco shed. These facilities were extant in 1996 but had been removed by 2007.

Operation of the station ceased in 1997, and the facility had been demolished by 2001.

Redevelopment
A 275 kV substation still occupies part of the site, this has 275 kV high voltage connections to/from Currie, Fetteresso, Grangemouth, Longannet and Tealing substations.

The northern approach to the new Clackmannanshire Bridge built across the Firth of Forth and completed in late 2008 cuts across the extreme west end of the site. The site was used for the storage of a large quantity of track materials for the rebuilding of the Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine rail link, which is now operating, and is currently being used as a coal unloading and stockpiling area.

This facility was latterly owned by the privatised Scottish Power utility group.

title: Kincardine power station


text:
User talk:Diskzero

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:38, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Notability of The Valley Ride
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Valley Ride, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Valley Ride seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Valley Ride, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Diskzero


text:
User talk:Pa ma

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:39, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pa ma


text:
Stuart Golabek

Stuart Golabek (born 5 November 1974 in Inverness) is a Scottish retired professional footballer who last played for Highland League side Brora Rangers.

Career
Golabek began his career with Highland League side Clachnacuddin, before moving to Ross County, where he played for nearly four years, before joining Inverness Caledonian Thistle in June 1999.

He quickly made a name for himself as a strong, hard-tackling defender and soon became an important member of the first team. In his first season with Inverness, Golabek was a member of the team that famously beat Celtic in the Scottish Cup on 8 February 2000. In the seasons that followed, Golabek continued to work hard in the Inverness defence, and when Bobby Mann left the club in the summer of 2004, Golabek was made team captain.

The highlights of Stuart Golabek's career include two wins against Celtic in the Scottish Cup, winning the Scottish Challenge Cup in 2003 and winning the First Division in 2004 and 2010, all with Caley.

By January 2007, he made only two league appearances in the 2006–07 season and was going to be transferred to Peterhead on loan until the end of the season. However, this fell through and he went to Livingston on loan instead.

On 30 May 2007, it was announced that Golabek had joined Ross County on a free transfer. He became new manager Dick Campbell's first signing.

Golabek returned to Inverness in 2009, signing a one-year contract. He signed a contract extension to play in the Scottish Premier League for the 2010–11 season.

Brora Rangers
On 22 May 2011, it was announced that Golabek was due to return to the Highland League by joining Brora Rangers. He retired from playing in 2014.

title: Stuart Golabek


text:
User talk:Elizabete Rutens

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:39, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elizabete Rutens


text:
User talk:Nmulder

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:40, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Plural of Macintosh
I have reverted your edit on the Mac OS article. Go to Apple.com. A search for "Macintoshes" yields numerous results; a search for "Macintoshi" yields none. – Mipadi 21:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Lopez_de_Romaña.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lopez_de_Romaña.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Molda
Tan locos los de wiki, como van a poner ese statement en ways of speaking spanish en el perú. Justo vi que te invirtieron tu change, volví a borrar ese false statement. Blaos men.Misantropo 19:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mifarma

A tag has been placed on Mifarma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 06:28, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nmulder


text:
User talk:KWB

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:40, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:KWB


text:
User talk:Frijoles99

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:40, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Frijoles99


text:
Talk:Murder of Suzanne Jovin

Cleanup
This article was completely rewritten on January 4, 2008 and fully sourced to detail the current facts and status of the case.
 * Cleanup? I'm sorry, but a lot of this needed to be reverted. Biased rhetoric, awkwardly written in places, rambling, LOTS of irrelevant details that add nothing to the article (or are totally inappropriate, like the reference to the Duke case), and above all, an entire section of wild theories/pontificating does NOT belong on Wikipedia, especially without citations. CagedRage (talk) 03:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

-

The January 4th edit was the result of nine years of meticulous research, replete with citations, by people who have followed this case from day one. These people include award winning journalists, Yale professors, noted authors, attorneys, law enforcement sources, and plain old concerned citizens. To reintroduce hearsay and speculation long disproven just because someone put it in print many years ago is not only bad journalism, it’s just plain wrong.

I understand you meant well. I also acknowledge that you made some very good English language edits. I didn’t undo your edits because you were not articulate or because you had malicious intent. Rather, you just don’t possess the requisite knowledge of this case to make the factual decisions that you did. To claim something we wrote as wild speculation based on your interpretation of invalid antiquated news articles does a disservice to people who actually research topics themselves rather than simply attempt to summarize the existing -- and most recent -- literature.

To quote your own user page: "Assume that your fellow editors are intelligent and educated." If something truly needs to be changed here, let’s sensibly first discuss it here rather than just assume the worst. Thanks. Jsmitchell (talk) 06:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

 * For the second time, THIS IS NOT A BLOG. Pontificating wild, badly-written, unsupported theories is NOT appropriate on this article and should be deleted.  Unless you reference specific, credentialed individuals who have offered theories about the crime, STOP rambling about sexual deviance, when she dropped her Fresca bottle, and other amateur minutia.  I don't care how much research you've done. That does NOT make you most qualified to edit this article. Start a blog or message board if you want to discuss such nonsense.

Also, naked Google map links don’t belong in the article body; neither do explanations of who Richard Jewell was. (That’s what LINKS are for.) The entire "theories" section will and should remain deleted.

I was going to keep some of your changes, like I did last time, but because you completely reverted my revision, I reverted yours. That was totally RUDE, and as a result, I'm not going to extend you any courtesies.CagedRage (talk) 23:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

-

The fact you consider my edits "rude" implies to me you are choosing vanity over substance. Please reconsider this approach. Just because others have been rude to you does not mean I am being as such. I have chosen to edit this entry simply because I do feel as or more qualified than anyone in the world to do so. The New Haven police know who I am. Most of the people who have written the very articles that you cite either have talked to me or know who I am. Am I saying that this makes me infallible? Of course not. But, at the very least, I feel I am more qualified than you to write this one entry out of millions on Wikipedia. Nothing personal at all here.

As I wrote before, you can indeed write and edit well. But what we are dealing with here is an *unsolved* crime. It's also a crime that is approaching its 10th anniversary. In those 10 years, much of the early speculation has been replaced by fact or meticulously researched conclusions. I have done my best to keep this entry factual and current. Sometimes a smoking gun solves a crime, and other times it's the minutia.

Since this is a discussion area, I'll take a brief moment to discuss the importance of the Fresca bottle. Without such, the campus timeline ends on College St as per the Vanity Fair article. With such, the timeline ends way up on Elm, likely past York St. The point being that an entire group of people who may have seen something suspicious in the latter location may to this day not have a clue it is relevant to solving this crime. That's why detectives spend countless hours trying to reconstruct crime scenes. The "theories" section is the result of such an effort. Personally I think this murder will be solved by DNA, but as one never knows, crime reconstruction is still of the utmost importance.

Jsmitchell (talk) 15:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral point of view
Members of the JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=2265877#post2265877 are trying to delete the fact that subject of Jovin's thesis was Osama bin Laden. This fact is well-documented and is central to the case. Van de Velde's area of expertise is Al Qaida. Their personal political biases about "conspiracy theorists" have no place in this encyclopedia. *Murder Most Yale: The Postscript – Vanity Fair January, 2006 *Suzanne Jovin must not be forgotten The Yale Herald December 2, 2002

 * No one in the JREF forum is trying to remove the fact all together. We're trying to keep it neutral from Conspiracy Theorists who are claiming that Suzanne was murdered by a government agent to "cover up 9/11". This is due to the fact that "Killtown" posted an extremely inaccurate blog entry with no sources and is now trying to edit the wikipedia entry to go along with his article. Wikipedia is neutral - we're trying to keep it that way.

 * I have removed the Osama Bin Ladin section (it hardly requires it's own section) and move the information about her thesis topic to a more relevant section of the document.

I'm a little worried about the neutrality of this article. Is it too strident in defending Van de Velde? SkipSmith 22:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How would that be possible? There is no evidence at all against Van de Velde. - Nunh-huh 00:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles should be neutral in their point of view. See WP:NPOV.  This article should just report the facts rather than read as an empassioned essay written by one of Van de Velde's friends.  For example, calling a report "false" rather than "utterly false" is a more neutral approach. SkipSmith 03:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * When something is completely baseless, and you report it as anything other than utterly false, you risk defaming the living by libeling them. - Nunh-huh 03:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * We could include a section: Evidence against Van de Velde and leave it blank. Gzuckier 16:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Or we could strive for a neutral point of view in the article. SkipSmith 03:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * We should strive for accuracy: that means not overemphasizing accusations just because they are "another side" when they are baseless. - Nunh-huh 03:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

There seem to be 2 parallel conversations, so I'm consolidating my answers here. Describing media reports as "false" rather than "utterly false" is not defaming anyone. If "utterly false" is OK, why not "completely, utterly, insanely false"? Reporting on the false accusations in a neutral manner is not "overemphasizing" them, and is consistent with an accepted wiki standard --- WP:NPOV. There are other troubling aspects in this article too, like the baseless speculation that the media disliked Van de Velde because he was popular with the students. Emotion needs to be separated from fact here. SkipSmith 20:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Specific issues are always better than "worries about neutrality". If you think the removal of "utterly" improves the article, remove it. But please read the article more carefully, because there's no speculation, baseless or otherwise, that "the media disliked Van de Velde because he was popular with the students". - Nunh-huh 21:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * "the baseless speculation that the media disliked Van de Velde because he was popular with the students" ??? Are we reading the same article? Gzuckier 16:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Here's the sentence I was referring to: Van de Velde's background and general manner and style, very distinct from the usual Ivy League academic, made him popular with students but may have fueled the salacious and irresponsible media reporting in the early days of the investigation. I stand corrected --- the baseless speculation here is that the media was salacious and irresponsible because of Van de Velde's distinctiveness from the usual Ivy League academic.

The problem with the sentence above is that it is improper to editorialize about the news coverage of the case --- this crosses the line from fact to opinion. There are also several examples of editorializing or speculation disguised as factual statements --- for instance, there are several sentences that begin "Many people believe ..." and go on to speculate about the unknown motives of the various people involved in the case. The timeline section has several examples of this.

At the minumum, if we're going to editorialize and speculate, let's speculate along with the New Haven police and others who think Van de Velde is guilty, and point out things like 20/20 reported that of 20 suspects, only Van de Velde did not have a confirmed alibi, Van de Velde was accused of stalking several women, and so on. The article says these accusations of stalking were proven "utterly false", but no link is provided. Could we say "Many people think Van de Velde is a stalker"? SkipSmith 06:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Maybe WP:NPOVT will help people see what I'm talking about? SkipSmith 06:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

 * Please see Biographies_of_living_persons. Unsourced or poorly sourced negative material relating to living persons is inappropriate in Wikipedia articles. - Nunh-huh 06:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

 * I agree we'd need to be careful with not posting anything defamatory. However, I think we do need to balance this article out a bit --- right now it reads like the media and police just picked Van de Velde at random and decided to persecute him for fun or because he was different in some way.  There's a bit more to their case than that, and it would be appropriate to mention it and remove some of the more blatant editorializing and speculation in the article. SkipSmith 21:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Another section
Vandals from the JREF Forum are attempting to delete the topic of Jovin's thesis: Osama bin Laden. This is sourced in multiple articles and is clearly a key element of the case.

 * Your suggested unreferenced "many people think Van de Velde is a stalker" is pretty defamatory. And what "more" do you find in the police's so-called "case"? - Nunh-huh 21:35, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The "many people think he's a stalker" phrase was a joke, pointing out the editorializing used in this article. The police focused on Van de Velde because he didn't have a confirmed alibi, he knew the victim, and several women accused him of stalker-like behavior. It's a weak case, but isn't not a "so-called case." The fact that you use that phrase suggests you're not interested in writing a neutral article, and I'm probably wasting my time trying to explain this to you. SkipSmith 18:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

 * If you think that telling me that "knowing someone" is a case, you are indeed wasting your time rather than "explaining" anything to me. Why not make a serious suggestion rather than a joke? - Nunh-huh 19:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

 * You seem to get more strident and hostile each time I talk to you, which is doing little to convince me that you're interested in working with me to create an unbiased article. In reading your user talk page it appears you like to pick fights, so I'll take another approach.  I've flagged the article for WP:NPOV to try to get some other perspectives on this.  SkipSmith 23:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd seen your tag before I wrote my last message here. If you think tagging accomplishes something, by all means do so. Please keep your personal attacks to a minimum. - Nunh-huh 00:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "I'd seen your tag before I wrote my last message here." Congratulations!  "If you think tagging accomplishes something, by all means do so."  Thanks, I will!  "Please keep your personal attacks to a minimum."  Sarcastic belittler of other people's "ideas" and a victim of harassment!  Wow!  SkipSmith 18:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * What part of keeping your personal attacks to a minimum is it that you disagree with? - Nunh-huh 18:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Pot, meet kettle. SkipSmith 23:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * As far as I can remember, I've never personally attacked you. I've never speculated that your motivations are insincere or that you are uninterested in article quality. Not all pots are black, it appears. - Nunh-huh 00:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * September 6: If you think that telling me that "knowing someone" is a case, you are indeed wasting your time rather than "explaining" anything to me. Why not make a serious suggestion rather than a joke?  September 8: I've never speculated that your motivations are insincere or that you are uninterested in article quality.  Wow.  Just, wow.  SkipSmith 19:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You need to look up what a "personal attack" is. You haven't listed any. - Nunh-huh 19:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Kettle, meet pot. SkipSmith 19:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You need to look up what a "personal attack" is.- Nunh-huh 20:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, this was fun for a while, but now I'm bored, so I'm going to move on. Sorry --- I know you enjoy this kind of thing, but I've got better things to do.  SkipSmith 00:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Buh bye. - Nunh-huh 06:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Farewell. We'll miss your mature contributions to this discussion.  SkipSmith 19:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Possible police motive
Well, this is the problem; the missing fact in the case, i.e. that Yale and New Haven were still suffering under the depiction of New Haven as a town where students were likely to be randomly murdered by strangers on the street, due to students having been randomly murdered by strangers on the street in previous years, and were jumping at the chance to portray the crime as some kind of crime of passion which would not result in the drop in enrollment which had followed the previous random murders, is what explains it, rather than any suspicious behavior of Van de Velde. I had this with a source, but of course it got deleted because it was a strong accusation and the source was not the most reliable, so now in the name of fair and balanced we have to beef up the accusations of Van de Velde instead. It's a wiki wiki world. Gzuckier 22:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

 * The desire to keep negative publicity about New Haven out of the news is a possible motive, but it is speculation. Maybe it could be mentioned as something that Van de Velde's supporters believe?  SkipSmith 23:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you against speculating in articles, or for it? You keep suggesting that we do it. How is one type of speculation better than another? Without sources, speculation doesn't belong. The police suspected someone, couldn't find any evidence to back up that suggestion, and moved on. Where's the mystery? - Nunh-huh 00:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm against speculation, and I'm glad to see you are too. That means we'll need to rewrite significant portions of the article, as I've already pointed out.  My suggestion to Gzuckier was that his speculation might be mentioned as a possible motive attributed to the police or Yale by Van de Velde's supporters. SkipSmith 18:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Uh, I see where the part I put in about Yale & New Haven trying to whitewash isn't deleted, I just lost track of where I put it with the citation. D'oh! I'll try to relocate it so it makes more sense, logic flow wise, without being too biased. Gzuckier 14:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Other sources to seek out
Does anyone have access to the 20/20 show transcript where they covered this case? I think it costs money online, and it might be worth springing for at some point, but if someone has a version available it would be a great resource for this article. SkipSmith 00:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I second the call for more material from the 20/20 show on this case. Not only would the transcript be useful, but referencing the actual video would be useful as well, especially 20/20's attempt to interview Van de Velde in the days immediately following the murder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidweiner23 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Here's another article I found that might be useful:

http://www.yaleherald.com/archive/xxix/2000.04.14/news/p3opa.html

SkipSmith 19:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Original research
I removed the Theories section, as it was almost entirely original research. More cleanup is needed on the rest of the article. Superm401 - Talk 22:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup citations
I converted the citations from the disfavored in-line format to footnotes per Wiki policy. After giving this over an hour, it's still not done. The Wikipedian who inserted the citations did not insert titles, authors, or dates, nor did they consolidate multiple references to a single source by using the

for the first use of a source, followed by
 *   (note the slash which takes the place of the closing REF tag!)

with no need to retype the URL, title, etc. for subsequent references to the same source. I left enough examples so they can pick up where time forced me to stop. Titles need to be introduced where I just the end of the URL (in order to temporarily identify repeated sources until someone has time to put in titles, authors, and dates). The article still has POV problems and overheated language. — LisaSmall T/ C 05:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Notability
This 1998 murder case may be of local interest, but I am not sure it qualifies as an encyclopedic subject and could be a candidate for WP:DELETE, particularly as it gives ongoing unfavorable publicity to a person who has not been charged, see WP:BLP. There are also notability problems, and the article runs afoul of WP:ONEEVENT and WP:NTEMP as well. Agree? Disagree? — LisaSmall T/ C 05:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Many years later. But, I definitely disagree.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Nearly impossible?
"She was reportedly last seen alive at between 9:25-9:30pm..."

"At 9:55, a passerby dialed 911 to report a woman bleeding at the corner of Edgehill Rd and East Rock Rd, a posh neighborhood 1.9 miles from the Yale campus where Jovin was last seen alive..."

"it was virtually impossible for her to have reached the intersection of Edgehill and East Rock Roads by foot in the short span of time that elapsed between when she was last seen alive and when she was found bleeding by witnesses..."

1.9 miles in 25 minutes implies a walking speed of 5 miles an hour, which is 2 miles per hour faster than the average walking speed but by no means "impossible". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.35.179.230 (talk) 21:26, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

 * Well, as you quoted, the statement said "virtually impossible" ... not "impossible". Also, I believe that the theory is that Jovin was in a vehicle while traveling those 1.9 miles, not that she walked that distance on foot.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Murder of Suzanne Jovin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050427234838/http://www.yaleherald.com/article.php?Article=1515 to http://www.yaleherald.com/article.php?Article=1515
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050422021326/http://cityofnewhaven.com/police/html/press/2001/2001_mar_27.htm to http://cityofnewhaven.com/police/html/press/2001/2001_mar_27.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080226184905/http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=24199622 to http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=24199622

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murder of Suzanne Jovin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080522120614/http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YTcyOTVmMTQ2ZGY4NzEzNzA5ZDEzNmQxMzIyMzYwZjE= to http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YTcyOTVmMTQ2ZGY4NzEzNzA5ZDEzNmQxMzIyMzYwZjE=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Murder of Suzanne Jovin


text:
User talk:Volante23

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Volante23


text: User talk:70.21.145.107

title: User talk:70.21.145.107


text:
User talk:Dd1250

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dd1250


text:
User talk:Moonese

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:UTStarcom logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:UTStarcom logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moonese


text:
User talk:Olliver~enwiki

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Olliver. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Olliver~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:14, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Olliver~enwiki


text:
User talk:Mike laster

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mike laster


text:
User talk:SarahEJennings

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:SarahEJennings


text:
User talk:Sigoldberg1

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sigoldberg1


text:
User talk:GoonerW

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 01:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

title: User talk:GoonerW


text:
Benrishi

Benrishi (弁理士) is a Japanese legal profession specifically licensed to practice intellectual property law. Most benrishi specialize in patent law, but are also allowed to practice in copyright, trademark, unfair competition and trade secret law.

While benrishi are often referred to as "patent attorneys" in English, their qualifications differ from patent attorneys in the United States and Germany in some aspects. Benrishi are not necessarily required to possess legal educations. Benrishi also have greater authority than patent specialists in other countries, as they are allowed to represent clients in administrative proceedings and out-of-court bargaining related to IP rights.

The benrishi examination (弁理士試験 benrishi-shiken) covers a broad range of intellectual property law (patent, utility model, design, trademark, treaties, copyright and unfair competition law) and limited fields of law and science. The benrishi examination consisted of three stages. The first stage is the multiple choice exam, the second stage is the essay exam, and the final stage is the oral exam.

, 9,300 benrishi are practicing in Japan, approximately as many per capita as in the United States. Entrance to the profession is regulated by a low pass rate (about 7% as of 2008; it was less than 3% until about 1997) on the benrishi examination only. The Japan Patent Office and government officials have expressed an interest in attracting more individuals to the profession as part of a broader series of reforms in Japan's legal professions.

Different from a U.S. patent agent, a benrishi is qualified to prosecute trademark applications, assist clients in copyright and licensing matters, and to represent clients in some court proceedings and custom seizure matters.

History
The benrishi profession was adopted from German patent law, which Japan duplicated during the Meiji era. The Benrishi Law (弁理士法 benrishi-hō) was passed in 1921 and remained almost unchanged through the end of the 20th century.

In 2001, after a decade of economic stagnation, the Benrishi Law was changed, and the role of the benrishi in the patent system was changed significantly. Benrishi were allowed to represent clients in adversarial proceedings before customs courts and in arbitration. The law was revised again in 2002 to allow benrishi to represent clients in courtroom litigation, either independently of or in cooperation with attorneys. Benrishi has been qualified to be a legal representative for appealing to the Intellectual Property High Court (the exclusive jurisdiction) representing the client against the adverse decision of Trial Board (consisting of three administrative trial judges) of Japan Patent Office, and even up to the Supreme Court (The Benrishi Law Article 6). Benrishi can also represent the infringement cases if it meets the criteria (The Benrishi Law Article 6bis).

Business
The main duties of a Benrishi are as follows.

 * Representation to the Patent Office about patents, designs, trademarks, etc.
 * Representation of arbitration cases about intellectual property rights
 * Representation of negotiating and entering into contracts about patent and copyrighted rights, confidential technical sales contracts and licenses
 * Counsel for litigation under the Patent Law, etc.

Qualification regimes
A person qualified to be a Benrishi is:

 * a person who has passed the Japanese patent attorney examination;
 * a person qualified to become a lawyer
 * a person who has been engaged in the affairs of examination or trial as an examiner or trial examiner of the Patent Office for a total of 7 years or more

(Article 7 of the Act).

However, a person qualified to become a BENRISHI needs to register as a patent attorney with the Japan Patent Attorneys Association (Article 17 of the Act).

Test Contents
The purpose of the patent attorney examination is to determine whether a person who intends to become a patent attorney has the necessary knowledge and applied skills to become a patent attorney. Those who have passed the patent attorney examination and completed practical training are qualified to become patent attorneys.

The patent attorney examination consists of a written examination and an oral examination, and only those who have passed the written examination may take the oral examination. The written examination consists of a mark-sheet examination and essay-based examination, and only those who have passed the mark-sheet examination may take the essay-based examination.

Mark-sheet examination
The following examination subjects are given in a short-answer (multiple-choice) format.

 * Patent Law and Utility Model Law
 * Design Law
 * Trademark Law
 * Industrial property treaties (Paris Convention, Patent Cooperation Treaty, etc.)
 * Copyright Law and Unfair Competition Prevention Law

Essay-based examination
Only those who have passed the mark-sheet examination may take the essay-based examination. The examination is given in the form of a paper, and the required subjects are laws and regulations concerning industrial property rights (Patent Law, Utility Model Law, Design Law, and Trademark Law), and the following elective subjects.

 * 1) Science and Engineering I (Mechanics) Mechanics of materials, Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Soil Engineering
 * 2) Science and Engineering II (Mathematics and Physics)  physics, electromagnetism, circuit theory
 * 3) Science and Engineering III (Chemistry)  Physical chemistry, organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry
 * 4) Science and Engineering IV (Biology) General biology, biochemistry
 * 5) Science and Engineering V (Information) Information theory, computer engineering
 * 6) Law (Laws relating to the practice of patent attorneys) Civil law

Oral examination
This examination is taken by those who have passed the written paper examination. The examination will cover laws and regulations related to industrial property rights.

Difficulty level
The trend of the passing rate is as follows.

title: Benrishi


text:
User talk:AllynCarter

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merge
 * New user log
 * Be Bold
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Wikiquette
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * User page
 * How to upload files
 * Image copyright tags

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username. I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ]

01:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:AllynCarter


text:
User talk:Dogcow/Archive1

generic welcome poo
Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 01:43, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

ZFS
I think I've fixed the ZFS situation, but it's late and I'd appreciate it if you could look things over and make sure everything is ship shape.--Commander Keane 18:56, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, everything's ducky. Obrigato! --moof 19:18, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Dispute and editing the dates
And what is your source? The Strauss/Howe's generation years are listed right here on wikipedia, look up their names and the years that I put are the ones they use. You have Gen X ending in 1977 or whatever, and that's nothing but your opinion. The Generation articles are all under dispute because they're simply not factual for the most part. The only real fact to go on (for dates) is the Strauss and Howe dates, since they in fact came up with all the generations.

LOL
I've run across a couple, actually. Catamorphism 20:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

UNIX NPOV in Linux entry
D'oh. Missed that. I just reverted the GNU change to the same entry, too. Good catch on your part. Georgewilliamherbert 23:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

now, is that service or what?
See omega-consistent theory. --Trovatore 06:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

AIV vs VIP
Hi. I noticed you added to Vandalism in Progress. That page is only for very specific cases, as described by the page's guidelines. Your alert would be better placed on Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV), where it will usually be processed within minutes. Many alerts that are incorrectly placed on Vandalism in Progress are never dealt with, simply because they become old before an administrator gets to them. Thanks for your efforts. :) -- light  darkness (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

grin
Great username. —Steve Summit (talk) 01:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cafeichigo13.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cafeichigo13.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 23:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Rikdo Koshi

 * Another thing - the WP manual of style for japanese specifically states the macron'ed versions of long vowels should be used, and you replaced a couple instances of them with ou. --moof 00:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The MOS specifically states that the macronned form should be used only if no other form can be found. See point five, "Macron usage..." I think I am in full compliance with the MOS. --Monocrat 00:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Contract with America
It's no big deal, but I note the following from the article: the Contract was signed by all but two of the Republican members of the House, and all of the Party's non-incumbent Republican Congressional candidates.

In other words, saying "X signed the contract" is really just saying "X was a Republican incumbent or candidate in the U.S. House in 1994." John Broughton 14:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Jello Biafra and Church of the Subgenius
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rsm99833 04:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

yog[h]urt
In yogurt, when you %s/yogurt/yoghurt/g'ed, you whacked the spelling section which was supposed to contain all the variants. Be a little more wary of such global replaces next time, 'kay? :) --moof 09:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry! Thanks for fixing it! — Mets501 (talk) 11:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Limited liability company external links
Hi Dogcow. You recently edited the external links section of the limited liability company article. there has been some change there recently and I'm asking all regular editors to comment on the links on the talk page under the Links heading so we can come to a consensus about what should be on the articles page. Your comments would be much appreciated. Thanks --Siobhan Hansa 03:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dogcow/Archive1


text:
User talk:Chentianran~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 01:44, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Chentianran. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Chentianran~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chentianran~enwiki