text:
User talk:ShinigamiNiko

Welcome!
Hello , and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes ( ~   ) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!   Fir  e  Fo  x  19:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Template messages
 * Sandbox

Fair use rationale for Image:Be a man (album).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Be a man (album).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:SHAMROCK (Single Cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SHAMROCK (Single Cover).jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:TadoritsukuBasho(HaMC).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TadoritsukuBasho(HaMC).jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:TadoritsukuBashoCD+DVD(HaMC).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TadoritsukuBashoCD+DVD(HaMC).jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Evergreen16.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Evergreen16.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  Σ xplicit  02:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SHAMROCK (Single Cover).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SHAMROCK (Single Cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:60s 70s 80s.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:60s 70s 80s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Colors of the Heart (Low).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Colors of the Heart (Low).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:60s 70s 80s CD+DVD.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:60s 70s 80s CD+DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Here We Go! (Missile Innovation song)

The article Here We Go! (Missile Innovation song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Non-notable and unreferenced. The only notability claimed is #145 in Oricon Weekly Chart for one week, tagged as unreferenced since December 2009."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Here We Go!.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Here We Go!.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:ShinigamiNiko


text:
User talk:Zyxw

Welcome to my talk page.

Category:Templates calling Infobox officeholder has been nominated for deletion
Category:Templates calling Infobox officeholder has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:FIG template with ID same as Wikidata

A tag has been placed on Category:FIG template with ID same as Wikidata indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit  14:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Change of article names
Hello! Can you change article names about biathletes in context that many of them has become married?. Paulina Fialková has changed name Paulina Batovská Fialková, Dzinara Alimbekava has married and is now named Smolskaya, Martina Zellner is now named Seidl after she married many years ago, Katharina Innerhofer is now named Komatz 80.212.168.110 (talk) 14:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

 * I moved Paulína Fialková to Paulína Bátovská Fialková, Dzinara Alimbekava to Dzinara Smolskaya, and Katharina Innerhofer to Katharina Komatz since their official International Biathlon Union profiles use the new name (the IBU links are shown in the external links section of each article). I also added some references for the name change in each of those articles. I did not move Martina Zellner since her IBU profile still uses that name. -- Zyxw (talk) 15:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Zyxw!

Happy New Year! Zyxw, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

 * Thanks and Happy New Year to you also! -- Zyxw (talk) 15:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Filmweb title
A Wikidata 12222 property, help me! MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

 * I see your edit on December 16 broke the template while attempting to add the Wikidata property and your previous edit on October 29 made every instance of the template link to https://www.filmweb.no/film/ (without an ID number). To fix this, I checked all articles currently using Filmweb title and they all contain an ID number for the old website. None of those IDs work at the current website and none of the articles have an ID for the current website in Wikidata property . Therefore, I changed the template to display archived links. You can see two examples in the documentation that I added. I will look into adding the Wikidata property for the current Filmweb.no URL without breaking all the existing links. -- Zyxw (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

 * I updated Filmweb title to support links using Wikidata property and added a new_id parameter to allow use of those new IDs in the template. -- Zyxw (talk) 13:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

 * @Zyxw UPD Please correct the templates LegendsTour and USOPC Hall of Fame, Wikidata properties wikidata:Property:P12283 and wikidata:Property:P12285. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

 * Done. -- Zyxw (talk) 09:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Note
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karachi_Football_League#

https://www.instagram.com/sindhsuperleague/?utm_medium=copy_link

This article needs major update, if can help appreciate 93.138.234.163 (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lu Dong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaoyang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Wheelchair basketball at the 2020 Summer Paralympics – Women's team rosters
Instead of doing this, run the tool and correct the rotten links. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  02:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

 * After I finish updating those Tokyo 2020 Paralympic links, I was planning to run this tool on all the pages at once, instead of one page at a time. -- Zyxw (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

 * That's fine. Let me know if there are any that do not work properly. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

About the local units of Barbados...
Greetings. How are you? And I'm curious about the populated places of the parishes of Barbados, alongside their respective boundaries within such sub-national maps. I wonder how you found such information. Your thoughts? jlog3000 (talk) 23:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

 * Hello. I believe your question may be related to edits I made many years ago. In August 2011, I made to List of cities, towns and villages in Barbados and  to Saint Andrew, Barbados. In September 2011, I uploaded a public domain image from the CIA World Factbook website, File:Barbados-CIA WFB Map.png, and added it to List of cities, towns and villages in Barbados. It would help if you could point out the update or map you are referring to, so I can try to refresh my memory. Thanks. -- Zyxw (talk) 01:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

 * I see. So you used the CIA World Factbook as a reference to add the villages or hamlets for each parish. And about the maps, that was my bad. jlog3000 (talk) 01:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

 * It would appear that List of cities, towns and villages in Barbados already had a list of villages under headings for each parish and I only sorted that list to place the headings in alphabetical order by the parish name. Then I probably expanded the individual parish articles such as Saint Andrew, Barbados to include the villages already found in List of cities, towns and villages in Barbados. Looking at those two articles now, there should be some citations added to show sources for the village names. Hope that helps. -- Zyxw (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

 * Then how come on that link of the List of cities, towns and villages in Barbados article shows the populated places sorted by parish partially or incomplete, while on some of the articles of the parishes show them almost expanded? jlog3000 (talk) 10:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

 * My edits to those articles occurred almost 13 years ago. I would assume that over time, other people added more locations to the parish articles without also updating the list article. Today I added some coordinates and a reference to Christ Church, Barbados because of your inquiry, but those coordinates appear to be inaccurate when viewed on a map. I will try to locate a better source online for these location names and their coordinates. -- Zyxw (talk) 10:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand all of that, as it's been nearly a decade and a half since you were the originator of the edits of putting the place name units/areas within almost every parish within Barbados. But I'm not focused on the coordinates, just the names of those units/areas; just to clarify things. Regardless, I thank and appreciate your time and effort hearing me out. jlog3000 (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Falls International Airport (logo).png
Thanks for uploading File:Falls International Airport (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:North Platte Regional Airport (emblem).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:North Platte Regional Airport (emblem).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Northern Maine Regional Airport at Presque Isle (logo).png
Thanks for uploading File:Northern Maine Regional Airport at Presque Isle (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Biathletes
Hello! Can you move the articles of these following biathletes?. Jana Gereková to Jana Daubnerová, Katja Beer to Katja Wüstenfeld, Magdalena Neuner to Holzer 193.161.216.9 (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

 * I moved Jana Gereková to Jana Daubnerová and moved Katja Beer to Katja Wüstenfeld since their official International Biathlon Union profiles use the new name (the IBU links are shown in the external links section of each article). I also added some references for the name change in both articles. I did not move Magdalena Neuner since her IBU profile still uses that name. -- Zyxw (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Biathletes
Hello! Can you move the articles of these following biathletes?. Natalya Moroz to Natalya Murschtschakina, Lyudmila Lysenko to Lyudmila Arlouskaya, Natalia Guseva to Sorokina i think that was her maiden name. 193.161.216.9 (talk) 20:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Biathletes
Hello! Can you move the articles of these following biathletes?. Iveta Knížková to Roubičková, Jiřina Adamičková-Pelcová to Pelcová 193.161.216.9 (talk) 20:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Novak Djokovic
I can Novak Djokovic ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duong Mai Duc Manh (talk • contribs) 10:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

 * Hello. An edit request with Edit semi-protected should be added on the article's talk page, which is Talk:Novak Djokovic. However, if there is a particular edit you wanted to make I can try to help. Also, as per WP:SEMI, you should be able to edit that article yourself once your account is at least 4 days old and has least 10 edits on English Wikipedia. -- Zyxw (talk) 11:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Karoline Knotten
Hello! Can you change the article from Karoline Offigstad Knotten to Karoline Knotten even though she uses her full name on her IBU profile everyone calls her Karoline Knotten 80.212.168.110 (talk) 21:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Altoona-Blair County Airport (logo).png
Thanks for uploading File:Altoona-Blair County Airport (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chiara Cainero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISSF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Belgian jujutsuka has been nominated for splitting
Category:Belgian jujutsuka has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Sari Furuya
Hello! Can you move the article Sari Furuya to Sari Maeda because she has that name at the present moment. 193.161.216.9 (talk) 12:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Template:Infobox biathlete
Hello! Can you add a parameter for national team year in the biathlete infobox. That means the year when the biathlete was in the elite team for the first time 80.212.168.110 (talk) 11:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CLL logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CLL logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Greek male figure skaters

A tag has been placed on Category:Greek male figure skaters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Halliburton Field (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Halliburton Field (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:IPC Tokyo 2020 profile
Template:IPC Tokyo 2020 profile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of FNSA
Hello Zyxw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged FNSA for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Zyxw


text:
User talk:Prefixcaz

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- P.MacUidhir 20:05, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Scandinavia
Hej. We would appreciate it if you would direct your attention to Talk:Scandinavia. Your edits have been reverted three times by myself and others, and we would prefer to discuss the reasons / cited sources for your edits rather than revert them without discourse.

- P . Mac Uidhir  (t)   (c)  20:05, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Hello again. :) I see you are having fun with editing Scandinavia. I am just going to wait until you pause for a while and then take a look at your additions again. Sound good?

 * Oh, and since you are new here, to respond to these messages just edit this page and add your comments below mine, using : marks in increasing amounts at the left to mark new comments. So, for example, to respond to this one I am writing now, use two : marks at the left. This is one of those things I had to learn on my own before encountering the How_to_edit_a_page, so I thought to mention it in case you have not read that article.

 * Prefixcaz 03:18, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks Pádraic, It feels comforting having you as a mentor. I did of course have a look at your fields of interest and I must say we share many of them. I'm looking forward to our discussions. And yes, I am indeed modifying the text to give more insight on the usage of the terms in the subject :) The article is cutting corners a little bit, in my opinion.

 * The languages. A Norwegian understands a Swedish speaker and a Dane just fine. A Swedish speaker might understand about 60% of Danish, but the problem is a very different pronounciation of Danish compared to Norwegian, Swedish and Finland-Swedish. Also the influence of Dutch and German in the Danish vocabulary causes problems. From a Danish point of view, they understand Norwegian very well, as the Norwegian vocabulary has been infuenced by Danish for hundreds of years, even if the pronounciation of Norwegian is closer to Swedish, but face problems understanding Swedish when the problem with a bigger difference in the vocabularity is combined with a very different pronounciation. Finland-Swedish is easier for a Dane to understand than Swedish is Sweden, as it has been influenced by Finnish in pronounciation, making it 'clearer' for a Dane to listen to. Not more similar, just simpler and clearer. In Finnish, all letters in a word are pronounced and this has had an effect on the Finland-Swedish.

 * In short,

 * Swe-Nor - easy both ways
 * Dan-Nor - easy both ways
 * FinSwe-Swe - easy both ways
 * FinSwe-Nor - easy both ways
 * Swe-Dan - difficult both ways, unless knowledge of
 * vocabularity+pronounciation
 * FinSwe-Dan - easier for Dan, but certain knowledge of vocabularity
 * is needed, difficult for FinSwe unless knowledge of vocabularity+
 * pronounciation

Prefixcaz 03:22, 9 October 2005 (UTC) Now, we solve these problems with a few simple tricks:

1) When I as FinSwe talk to a Swe, I avoid usage of terms that are only used in Finland, and use general common Swedish vocabulary. 2) When I speak with a Nor, I speak FinSwe but I use some Nor words. Same thing with a Dan, I mix Danish words into my FinSwe. 3) If there are words, that my conversational partner doesn't understand, we try to use synonyms or oldfashioned words, words that are not in common use in present day anymore. 4) If this doesn't solve the problem, we try to use words used in our own dialects, as dialects are normally older language and can provide very useful associations. 5) If the problem is still not solved, then we explain the meaning of the words in our respective mother tongues and try to find associations. 6) I'm in a lucky position, as I also speak Dutch and German. This means occasionally with the Danes, I can use them, so this would be the next step. 7) If the problem is STILL not solved, we use an English word :)

Actually it's like playing a word quiz all the time and with a little bit of routine it works just fine. But it is not honest to say, that there would be no trouble at all, or that the differences are merely a question of dialects.

As another curiosity, Icelandic is very old Norse spoken with similarities to Finnish 'clear/hard' way of pronouciation.

 * - - P . Mac Uidhir  (t)   (c)  17:50, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

My Studies and Wiki
I have gone back to school in my old days. The subject is Intercultural Communication and I'm studying it with a little bit of a special arrangement in Jyvaskyla Univ in Finland. As I live in Belgium, a lot of travelling is needed. Apparently I will also be attending some courses in Gent and/or Antwerp Univ's and furthermore I'm planning on joining some courses in certain SWE/DEN/NOR universities, haven't really decided where yet, but hopefully some additional studies in each country.

This means, due to a busy schedule, I will be updating my own user page and my comments/editions in Wiki in bursts. Sometimes there's more time for this, sometimes less. In case you wish to contact me, or are waiting for a reply regarding a subject, please be patient. Prefixcaz 01:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Please don't remove "citation needed" on Scandinavia
If you don't have the citations. This is a part of cleaning th article. Have fun editing --Comanche cph 22:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Copied and moved the discussion to Comanche cph. Prefixcaz 13:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nordiccouncil.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nordiccouncil.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 20:43, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war  according to the reverts you have made on Domestic violence against men. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Jytdog (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 * Wow, so when I reverted a text TWICE and referred to the TALK page, you discard the sources and give me a warning. That is censorship, bullying and misuse of admin rights.Luckily the edits are visible both on the article page as well as on the talk page. Prefixcaz (talk) 01:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * please read WP:BRD. It is great to be BOLD, but if you are reverted, discuss until things are figured out.  Don't talk and edit war.  Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 01:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Please have a look which one of us went to the Talk page and which one started reverting without discussion. Hint: I went straight to the Talk page. How about a little bit less of the hypocrisy and more to sticking to the rules of Wikipedia?Prefixcaz (talk) 02:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The edit warning is for your behavior. You were Bold, you were reverted and you added the content back, instead of waiting to allow consensus to develop.   You appear to be very new to WP.  It is strange since you have an edit history going back very far.  I just looked farther.  This account was inactive for a long time and just re-activated.  OK, I am going to write you a longer note. Jytdog (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You are still not checking the time of my edits in teh article and the Talk page. You should give yoursenf a warning, as you failed to come to the Talk-page before a double revert. Stop being a hypocrite and live up to the standards. I am not a user who started editing yesterday and I am not unfamiliar with the pillars. Don't misuse the trust put in you.Prefixcaz (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I see you would like to add content to my page without providing argumentation. I have deleted the last and will delete any further comments from you, unless they are warnings or blockings, as IMO you are misusing your admin rights and not participating in a discussion. I would very much appreciate you stop the bullying, engage in a discussion based on argumentation and counterargumentation and live up to the trust that has been put on you as an admin.Prefixcaz (talk) 02:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You are still not reading nor answering, thus I will be deleting all your comments on my page. Please stay respectful and do not attack other users. Talk about the content, not about a person.Prefixcaz (talk) 03:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User:Jytdog has been reverted or removed because it was placed on the editor's user page rather than the user's talk page. If you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * My apologies. I will place it on the user's talk page. Thank you for the advice.Prefixcaz (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prefixcaz


text:
Aristodemus of Miletus

Aristodemus of Miletus (Ἀριστόδημος; lived 4th century BC) was one of the oldest and most trusted friends of Antigonus Monophthalmus. He is described by Plutarch as an arch-flatterer of Antigonus. Antigonus frequently used him on important diplomatic missions and occasionally entrusted him with military commands as well.

Career
He is first mentioned in 319 BC when he brought Antigonus the news of Antipater's death.

Greece
In 314 BC, Antigonus sent him to the Peloponnese with 1,000 talents, ordered him to maintain friendly relations with Polyperchon and his son Alexander, to collect as large a body of mercenaries, and to conduct the war against Cassander. On his arrival in Laconia, he obtained permission from the Spartans to engage mercenaries in their country, and thus raised an army of 8,000 men in the Peloponnese. In this Aristodemus was outstandingly successful. The friendship with Polyperchon and his son Alexander was confirmed, and the former was made governor of the peninsula. The ruler of Ptolemaic Egypt, Ptolemy, who was allied with Cassander, sent a fleet against the general and the allies of Antigonus, and Cassander made considerable conquests in the Peloponnese. After his departure, Aristodemus and Alexander at first endeavoured in common to persuade the towns to expel the garrisons of Cassander, and recover their independence. But Alexander soon allowed himself to be made a traitor to the cause he had hitherto espoused, and was rewarded by Cassander with the chief command of his forces in the Peloponnese. In 313 BC, Aristodemus invited the Aetolians to support the cause of Antigonus; and having raised a great number of mercenaries from among them, he returned to the Pelopponese and attacked Alexander, who was besieging Cyllene, and compelled him to raise the siege. He then restored several other places, such as Patras and Dyme in Achaea, to what was then called freedom. In 312 BC, Aristodemus was reinforced by Antigonus's nephews Polemaeus and Telesphorus who both sailed their armies to the Peloponnese. Under the command of Polemaeus they brought all of Greece south of Thermopylae, except for Athens, into Antigonus's control. Cassander thereupon opened negotiations with Polemaeus; Artistodemus was one of the negotiators. He was also sent to negotiate with Ptolemy in Egypt. Through his negotiations he helped bring about the peace of 311 BC; the Peace of the Dynasts. In 307 BC, Aristodemus accompanied Demetrius on his great expedition to Greece to liberate Athens. After Demetrius captured Piraeus Aristodemus was sent into Athens to negotiate with Demetrius of Phaleron, Cassanders's ally and tyrant of Athens. As a result Cassander's forces withdrew from Athens, and Demetrius was able to proclaim the restoration of Athenian Democracy.

Back in Asia
When Antigonus commanded Demetrius to sail against Ptolemy's forces in Cyprus, Aristodemus accompanied him there. He was present during the great naval battle near Cyprian Salamis, where Demetrius annihilated Ptolemy's fleet and captured the island. Aristodemus was chosen to bring the news of the victory to Antigonus at his new city of Antigoneia-on-the-Orontes in Syria. There he was instrumental in an elaborate charade to have Antigonus elevated to kingship. Aristodemus landed from his ship alone and refused to give any indication of the news he bore, he advanced slowly to the royal palace, gathering a large crowd. Meeting the by now worried Antigonus at the palace gate, he cried aloud, "Hail, King Antigonus!" and described the great victory won. Enthused the assembled crowd proclaimed Antigonus king.

Return to Miletus
After his great moment in Antigoneia Aristodemus went back to Miletus where he entered high office.

title: Aristodemus of Miletus


text: User talk:192.67.48.23

title: User talk:192.67.48.23


text:
User talk:0101NGyh

Welcome!
Hello 0101NGyh, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes ( ~   ) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!   Fir  e  Fo  x  19:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Template messages
 * Sandbox

File source problem with File:BJ SingTao Visit 024.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:BJ SingTao Visit 024.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Headquarter.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Headquarter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:0101NGyh


text:
In a Glass House

In a Glass House is the fifth album by British progressive rock band Gentle Giant, released on 21 September 1973. The album is a loosely-realized concept project based on the aphorism "Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones". The record begins and ends with the sound of breaking glass. It is the first album released by the band following the departure of Phil Shulman.

Release
One of Gentle Giant's most popular albums (although the band themselves were not happy with it at the time, having to work under the pressure of Phil Shulman's departure), it was only available in the United States and Canada as a high priced import until 2004 when a digitally remastered CD was released. This was because their US label Columbia Records rejected the album as uncommercial. As a result, Columbia dropped the band from the label which contractually allowed the band to take ownership of the original master recording and all rights to it. This cleared the way for the first "official" release of the title in the United States on compact disc on the band's own Alucard label.

The 2004 release had two live recordings from the tour as bonus tracks. The album was reissued in 2005 and distributed by Derek Shulman's DRT label with 1 bonus live track as part of the 35th Anniversary reissue series of the band's back catalogue. In 2009, In a Glass House became available for the first time as a digital download with bonus live recordings (these recordings differed from the original 2004 and 2005 release of the album) remastered by Fred Kervorkian under the supervision of Ray Shulman. In a Glass House received a physical release on CD as part of a 40th Anniversary series of reissues this time without any bonus tracks with plans to release vinyl versions of all the band's albums from In a Glass House through Giant for a Day in late 2010.

The final track of the album is hidden. Following the song "In a Glass House", there is a delay then a brief recapitulation of every other track on the album. The song is named "Index" in LP releases but not marked in the cover of the CD releases. The album cover had a black and white lithograph of the group covered with clear plastic ("glass") on a die-cut.

Track listing
All lead vocals by Derek Shulman and Kerry Minnear, except "A Reunion", sung by Kerry Minnear.

 * 35th anniversary disc contains only "The Runaway/Experience" bonus track with a length of 9:43

Musicians

 * Gary Green – 6 string electric guitar (1, 3, 4, 5, 6), 12 string acoustic guitar (1, 6), 12 string electric guitar (4), steel guitar (6), mandolin (6), tambourine (6), treble recorder (3)
 * Kerry Minnear – Moog (1, 3, 6), Hammond organ (1, 3, 4, 6), piano (3, 4), Baldwin Electric Harpsichord (1, 3), electric piano (1, 5, 6), Thomas Organ (3, 4), clavichord (4), RMI 368 Electra-Piano and Harpsichord (4,6), celesta (2), glockenspiel (2,4), marimba (1,2), vibraphone (2), tympani (2), cello (5), descant recorder (1, 3), co-lead vocals (1, 3, 4, 6), lead vocals (5)
 * Derek Shulman – lead vocals (1-4, 6), alto saxophone and soprano saxophones (6), descant recorder (1)
 * Ray Shulman – bass guitar (1, 3-6), acoustic guitar (6), violin (3-6), tambourine (4), backing vocals (1, 6)
 * John Weathers – drums (1, 3, 4, 6), bass drum (5), cowbell (6)

Production

 * Arranged By Gentle Giant
 * Produced By Gentle Giant & Gary Martin
 * Recorded & Engineered By Gary Martin
 * Mixed By Dan Bornemark

title: In a Glass House


text:
User talk:Daniel998877665544332211

air is cool

title: User talk:Daniel998877665544332211


text:
Schleicher ASW 28

The ASW 28 is a Standard Class glider with a fifteen-metre span built of modern fibre reinforced composites. The manufacturer of the ASW-28 is Alexander Schleicher GmbH & Co. The 'W' indicates this is a design of the influential and prolific German designer Gerhard Waibel. Serial production started in 2000.

Design and development
The ASW 28 is a single-seat shoulder-winged composite construction sailplane with a T-shaped horizontal tailplane and 15 metre wingspan. The upper wing surface has Schempp-Hirth airbrakes.

As all Standard Class sailplanes, the ASW-28 does not have flaps or other lift-enhancing devices. It has tall winglets, a retractable undercarriage and a water ballast system. The structure is a complex composite of carbon, aramid and polyethylene fibre reinforced plastic. This permits a light structure with the strength to carry large amounts of water ballast, thus permitting the widest possible range of wing loadings for weak and strong soaring weather.

The ASW-28 supersedes the ASW 24 in the manufacturer's production line. It has – like its competitors Rolladen-Schneider LS8 and Schempp-Hirth Discus-2 – a version with wing extensions for the increasingly popular 18 metre Class, the ASW 28-18. The sustainer (non-self-launching) variant of the 18 metre version is the ASW 28-18 E. The sustainer uses a SOLO 2350 18 hp two-stroke engine.

Variants

 * ASW 28
 * Production variant with 15 metre wingspan.

 * ASW 28-18
 * Production variant with either a 15 metre or 18 metre span, also optional engine installation.

 * ASW 28-18 E
 * Production variant with a 13.2 kW (18 hp) SOLO 2350 2-stroke sustainer engine.

title: Schleicher ASW 28


text:
List of ministers of the interior (Denmark)

This is a list of interior ministers of Denmark since the establishment of the Danish Ministry of the Interior in 1848. The ministry was abolished in 2007 with most of the portfolio becoming part of a new Ministry of Welfare. It was reestablished in 2009.

Interior ministers under Christian X (1912–1947)
! colspan=8| No Danish government in between August 29, 1943 and May 5, 1945. Office is assumed by the permanent secretary.


text:
Talk:The Bouncer (video game)

Untitled
The Storyline

Somebody had obviously tried to play through the game, whilst writing down the storyline at the same time and then given up

title: Talk:The Bouncer (video game)


text:
User:Antibubbles

....

title: User:Antibubbles


text:
User:TecKnow

Biographical information
TecKnow is the internet identity of David Perkins. Born February 26, 1982 and raised in South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, David attained a Bachelors of Science in Software Engineering with a concentration in Electrical Engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering in 2004 and is currently pursuing a master's degree in Software Engineering at DePaul University In Chicago, Illinois.

David has been a convention going member of the science fiction fantasy and roleplaying communities since 1996.

My Sandbox

title: User:TecKnow


text:
User talk:Irgendwer

Libertarianism and politics
The rhetoric of libertarianism is often qualified by a political discourse because it is what people may observe in a life determined by politics. People see at first of all what's going on in the media about libertarian parties to reduce the state and to pave the way to a laissez-faire culture. But it is not the basic message of libertarianism to enforce its content by a parliament. The consequence of the libertarian core would be to refuse all government intervention but it wouldn't only be to reduce government to a neoliberal level or to a minimal state without the right to secede. One may ask ultimately if that can be libertarian at all, because it will tend in best case to an utilitarian kind of "freedom" but not to libertarian laws.

The minarchist philosopher Robert Nozick posed the basic issue of all legal theory: "The fundamental question of political philosophy, one that precedes questions about how the state should be organized, is whether there should be any state at all. Why not have anarchy?" (Anarchy, State and Utopia, 1974) This issue is not really answered by the major contemporary political philosophers and theorists, unless in a circular way to support a preconceived positive view of the role of the state, e.g. by citing Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan. Nozick himself did it in an other way, attracting criticism from the anarcho-capitalist camp and rather positive attention from statists. Given Nozick's premise that it doesn't make sense to debate subtypes of state when the state itself has no affirmative basis, the result must be as Hans-Hermann Hoppe describes:

 * "Just look at Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard. The two greatest economists and social philosophers of the 20th century were both essentially unacceptable and unemployable by the academic establishment. ... Despite all obstacles, it was possible for Mises and Rothbard to make themselves heard. They were not condemned to silence. They still taught and published. They still addressed audiences and inspired people with their insights and ideas. ... Rothbard had The Ludwig von Mises Institute, which supported him, helped publish and promote his books, and provided the institutional framework that allowed him to say and write what needed to be said and written, and that can no longer be said and written inside academia and the official, statist establishment media."

So some of the most consequential libertarian scholars must work outside the academic establishment. But what has been done instead in the official, political institutions by liberal and minarchist thinkers who (less consequential) are willing to use the state as a social regulator for whatever reason? Milton Friedman and others have successfully promoted useful political concepts which may be necessary to the effective functioning of even an exploitative statist system (in the view of social scientists such as Franz Oppenheimer).

Rothbard (The Ethics of Liberty, 1982) explained his view of the actual task of political philosophy:

 * "In our view the major task of “political science” or better, “political philosophy” is to construct the edifice of natural law pertinent to the political scene. That this task has been almost completely neglected in this century by political scientists is all too clear. Political science has either pursued a positivistic and scientistic “model building,” in vain imitation of the methodology and content of the physical sciences, or it has engaged in purely empirical fact-grubbing. The contemporary political scientist believes that he can avoid the necessity of moral judgments, and that he can help frame public policy without committing himself to any ethical position. And yet as soon as anyone makes any policy suggestion, however narrow or limited, an ethical judgment—sound or unsound—has willy-nilly been made. The difference between the political scientist and the political philosopher is that the “scientist’s” moral judgments are covert and implicit, and therefore not subject to detailed scrutiny, and hence more likely to be unsound. Moreover, the avoidance of explicit ethical judgments leads political scientists to one overriding implicit value judgment-that in favor of the political status quo as it happens to prevail in any given society. At the very least, his lack of a systematic political ethics precludes the political scientist from persuading anyone of the value of any change from the status quo.

 * In the meanwhile, furthermore, present-day political philosophers generally confine themselves, also in a Wertfrei manner, to antiquarian descriptions and exegeses of the views of other, long gone political philosophers. In so doing, they are evading the major task of political philosophy, in the words of Thomas Thorson, “the philosophic justification of value positions relevant to politic.”

 * In order to advocate public policy, therefore, a system of social or political ethics must be constructed. In former centuries this was the crucial task of political philosophy. But in the contemporary world, political theory, in the name of a spurious “science,” has cast out ethical philosophy, and has itself become barren as a guide to the inquiring citizen. The same course has been taken in each of the disciplines of the social sciences and of philosophy by abandoning the procedures of natural law."

There is a second reason why libertarianism must be rather an apolitical idea (i.e. to do something without government) originated in the meaning of the former Greek term of politics, i.e. 'polis'. So the 'Demos', referring to the population of an ancient Greek state, was the decided group within the process, by which uniform rules are made, should work. But there is no claim in libertarianism to make collective decisions within groups in a political process except that activism of inconsequently political groups considered to be made by "Libertarians". So 'politics' is historically and usually a term for a statist society to form the state. That doesn't belong to an anarchistic original interpretation of libertarianism. Consequently, the NAP (or libertarianism in its core) is not even content of the curriculum in any predominating political science or any reference book of political philosophy.

One may also understand libertarianism as a private intention to define the proper use of force. Such potential of behavior is described as "private law enforcement" or "security agencies". But just these issues are totally ignored in any bibliography of political philosphy. Also, libertarianism doesn't contain any intention to form a decided society. People could voluntarily agree to live in a Stalinist society, for example, without violating a single libertarian principle. But libertarian scholars rather eye the term 'society' suspiciously, because society don't act. Since only individuals act, the focus of study for the libertarian theorist is always on the individual.

For the record
For the record, I am not a minarchist. I'm not even a libertarian. Your personal attacks are as poorly aimed as they are misguided. — Saxifrage ✎ 17:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Apology and warning
My apologies for mispelling your username. From now on I will be sure to get the "er" right. I don't see how it's relevant to improving Libertarianism though. Now, as for your inappropriate and unceasing accusations of "troll":

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Saxifrage ✎ 16:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Alfrem/Irgendwer: If you continue making personal attacks you'll probably be involved in another arbitration case. I think you should focus on discussing the content of the libertarianism article instead of calling other users names. Rhobite 16:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The truth is no personal attack. --Irgendwer 16:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

 * The No personal attacks policy disagrees with that. Regarding your insistence on calling editors you disagree with vandals, here is a template for you:
 * Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you..
 * You will get yourself blocked eventually if you don't behave in a civilised manner. — Saxifrage ✎ 23:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

You have continued to call people troll and have asked me if I'm stupid. This is not appropriate behaviour for a Wikipedia editor:
 * Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. — Saxifrage ✎ 18:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

For your information, calling editors who disagree with your edits "offended minarchist psychopaths" is a personal attack. I just wanted to be sure you know that it qualifies as a personal attack, as you have in the past been somewhat clueless as to what does and does not qualify in the past. If you continue despite the repeated warnings you have been given, my next action will be to ask an administrator to block you temporarily for violation of No personal attacks. Hopefully you understand that such attacks are unacceptable and that step won't be necessary. — Saxifrage ✎ 18:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I am sorry. It is my hoenst opinion about some minarchists. I don't say it to insult you. I is the same to say that fat persons are fat when they ask if their are fat. You are too tetchy or too much minarchist. And you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia polices. "There is a difference between "You are a troll" and "You are acting like a troll"". --Irgendwer 20:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

 * If it is my honest opinion that you are an evil baby-eater, it is against Wikipedia policy for me to say so, even though it might be my honest opinion. I'm sorry you feel that policy doesn't apply to you and that you persist in misunderstanding policy (you are saying "you are a troll", not "you are acting like a troll") when it has been pointed out so often. Since you are unapologetic and insisting that you are justified in continued personal attacks, I am asking an administrator to review your behaviour and issue a block if they feel it is warranted. — Saxifrage ✎ 23:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I don't have said, "you are an evil baby-eater". I say, "I think about some Minarchist that ..." It is your problem when you take my defintion about some minarchist on yourself. This produces just evidence for me that I am right. --Irgendwer 05:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Continued personal attacks at Talk:Libertarianism
Irgendwer, I have tried to be reasonable, but I'm sorry to say that I'm getting frustrated. From your very first reply to me, it was apparent that you weren't going to be showing me much respect. That's fine, I'll deal with that, I've been on the internet for years, and I've got a pretty thick skin. At the same time, I would say that you've shown disregard for core policies like WP:NPOV and WP:NOR, with retorts along the lines of "so what?" and other attempts to evade serious discussion. Unfortunately, you seem to resort to personal attacks against your fellow editors on a regular basis (        and plenty more) despite numerous friendly warnings from some of the very same people you've insulted (    ). Please reconsider your behavior and stay cool, even in heated discussions. Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Regards, Luna Santin 19:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I am sorry. It is my hoenst opinion about some minarchists. I don't say it to insult you. I is the same to say that fat persons are fat when they ask if their are fat. You are too tetchy or too much minarchist. And you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia polices. "There is a difference between "You are a troll" and "You are acting like a troll"". --Irgendwer 20:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your apology, but I'm not sure if you understand the gravity of what I'm saying. "Troll" certainly does seem to be your favorite word:            . That's just from a quick glance at your contribs. Should we bring up the prior Irgendwer RfC? I will ask, one more time, as politely as I can manage: please cease and desist your continued personal attacks against other editors. Thank you. Luna Santin 06:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Apology? For what? This was no apology! Are you bored that you must scan my posts like a real troll? --Irgendwer 06:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|left|30px]]This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Luna Santin 07:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * My talk page is also no rubbish tip for unreasoned or endless repeated accusations or threats. So stop it. --Irgendwer 07:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Gladly -- just so long as you remain civil and avoid personal attacks against other users. I encourage you to keep a cool head. I would much rather that we discuss our differences calmly and peacefully. Luna Santin 07:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Which personal attack? --Irgendwer 08:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I've provided 34 diffs, 22 of which contain personal attacks. You've repeatedly called other users trolls, stupid, or even psychopaths . Please look at some of those links, and/or read over the no personal attacks policy. I remain, as always, more than happy to discuss our differences of opinion, but I must insist that the discussion be civil and constructive. Regards, Luna Santin 08:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Are you admin, a self called sherrif, an attorney of other people, or do you have to notice any current personal attack against you? --Irgendwer 09:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm not an administrator, but I'm afraid that's beside the point. Personal attacks are not acceptable on Wikipedia, per the above-cited policy. Luna Santin 09:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Removing Warnings
Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Paul Cyr 22:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I may delete done messages and false warnings, isn't it? --Irgendwer 06:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You may archive comments. Except in cases of clear vandalism, you shouldn't remove warnings from your talk page. If you feel a warning was made in bad faith, you should report it to WP:AN and ask someone to remove it. Paul Cyr 06:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I can archive but it is not forbidden to delete done message. "...erasing non-harassing personal messages without replying ... will probably be interpreted as hostile." The counterpart is to me: I may delete done messages. The user talk page is to talk with other users, not to archive needless crap. Please, where is this sentence supported: "Except in cases of clear vandalism, you shouldn't remove warnings from your talk page."? --Irgendwer 07:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Removing warnings is no official policy. I think, I should delete wrong warnings myself. Do you have an other direction? --Irgendwer 07:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

 * From WP:VANDAL:

 * Talk page vandalism
 * Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages, aside from removal of internal spam, or deleting entire sections of talk pages, is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors.

 * Paul Cyr 08:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

 * 1. So, I still may delete done messages. 2. I have asked you for a official policy. Removing warnings is no official policy. Where does your bold description come from? I cannot accept that users misuse wrong warnings (intentionally or not) to discredit me and than they leave the arena without my eyesore. --Irgendwer 09:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * If you feel that you were warned inappropriately, you should post the matter at the Administrators' Noticeboard. I encourage transparency; you're more than welcome to report my actions. Luna Santin 10:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Eh! Your are not questioned. I am not so boring that I must spread your imputations to the next institution. Either it is an official policy or it is not. I think not. If not then it is not my problem. You can also go to administration. --Irgendwer 10:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ahh, I see. Thought you were referring to my earlier messages. To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure whether or not such blankings are expressly forbidden under policy, but in the event that all of this does end up at ArbComm or AN/I, I have a strong hunch it'd be frowned upon. I personally had no plans to revert you on that count, but the discussion is visible in the page history, anyway. I'm concerned about the escalation of the situation, but if that's what it takes for us all to find a resolution, then... I guess we'll head down that road. Whatever happens in the next few days/weeks, I wish you nothing but the best. Luna Santin 10:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I gave you an official policy and said where my quote came from: "From WP:VANDAL:" Paul Cyr 13:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, I understand. I should also leave warnings on these users talk pages when they make a controversial remark. Then they cannot delete the warning from their talk page and must die with it. Fine troll tactic. :-( --Irgendwer 13:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * If you actually read what I said, you would have seen the part that says that you can take the issue to WP:AN and ask someone else to remove it.
 * Regarding your troll comment comment about my tactics being that of a troll:
 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|left|30px]]This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Paul Cyr 22:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You called my comment a "troll comment". Why? This is a personal attack. I will leave a warning on your user talk page. --Irgendwer 22:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think it would violate WP:AGF at this point to say that you knew that "your troll comment" refers to your comment where you said "Fine troll tactic". I've fixed it for you. Paul Cyr 23:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Now I can read that you asume that I wrote of "YOUR" troll tactics. So, you asume bad faith (again). I will leave a warning on your user talk page. --Irgendwer 05:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't be silly. It's clear that you were not writing about Paul, but that you were calling my, Luna's, and other's tactics "troll tactics". Just because you were not calling us trolls to our faces doesn't mean it's not a personal attack. — Saxifrage ✎ 15:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Nay. These are only good images for you. My honest opinion. --Irgendwer 15:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You've been told before that the NPA policy does not allow "honest opinion" to excuse personal attacks. — Saxifrage ✎ 15:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings is generally not a good thing. Is there a solid policy on it? No. But on the other hand, it simply isn't a good idea. It sends all of the wrong messages. #1 It's assuming bad faith. It's saying that you are not accepting the warning and that you are assuming that others are placing the warning on your page due to malace or some other invalid reason. Paul is not the type of user who puts warnings on talk pages willy nilly. None of us are. So when you see a warning, you need to keep it there and accept that you made a mistake and move on. #2 It's an accepted convention that removing warnings is a bad thing and should not be done. How do I know this? Well for one thing, we have a Template:Usertalk-vprotect template that is used when blocked users are removing warnings from their userpages. And also, I know that if you asked admins, the vast majority have blocked someone due to them removing warnings from their talk page or they at least see it as something that should be avoided. #3 There is no hard and true policy on this but there isn't on alot of our conventions. It's much like the 3 revert rule, where it clearly states that just because users can revert up to 3 times in a 24 hour period doesn't mean that they SHOULD.

Because of all of this, just don't remove the warnings. I would recommend what Paul recommended. If you object, take it to AN or AN/I but do not remove the warnings. If you feel like you are being picked on or think you should be left alone because if you haven't done anything wrong, take it to AN or AN/I. That's what those forums are there for. Thanks. --Woohookitty(meow) 08:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

 * You say: "Paul is not the type of user who puts warnings on talk pages willy nilly." The fact for me is he have put a warning on my talk page willy nilly. Please remove it when you are honest. BTW: I am not the type of user who must weep on so.'s shoulder. It is easier for me to change to a new account. --Irgendwer 08:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

 * We've given you the procedure for this. Follow it instead of removing warnings. And please don't threaten to use sockpuppets. You are just going to get yourself into more trouble that way. --Woohookitty(meow) 11:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

 * How nice! Are you not competent for removing wrong warnings? Your other hint is also brazen. To change to a new account is no sockpuppetery. --Irgendwer 12:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

 * I am trying to be as patient as possible here, but you are on thin ice given your recent behavior and your previous blocks. Just please follow the procedure that you have been given. And I wouldn't recommend suggesting that an admin is not competent. There is no reason for me to remove legitimate warnings such as the ones here. --Woohookitty(meow) 14:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Nay, I change my user account. I know that many admins are playing me for a sucker now. That's sport. --Irgendwer 15:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it's the fact that you are refusing to consider what we have to say, or that what you did was wrong. Paul Cyr 17:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Three-Revert Rule
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Paul Cyr 04:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

 * You should say which article and which day. I think, there is no conflict with 3RR. --Irgendwer 07:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * July 27, 2006 - 14:28
 * July 27, 2006 - 05:35
 * July 26, 2006 - 15:32
 * Those are the most recent 3 edits within a 24 hour period. Both you and Saxifrage have been edit warring on that page for a few days now.  Even if you do not outright violate 3RR, either of you may still be blocked for edit warring. Take the issue to the article's talk page. Paul Cyr 08:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

 * Ok. I pinpoint, 1. I don't have violate the 3RR but you blame me for 3RR. Your mistake. 2. It's true, there is a edit war. I shall take the issue on the article page. But I had done more than many times. My edit is an referenced improvement without POV. Saxifrage can't understand it or is not disposed to understand it. So he makes trouble. It's the same for me. I revert only to the more encyclopaedic version. Prove yourself. --Irgendwer 09:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't accuse you of violating the Three-Revert Rule, I specifically said, "If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule". The key point being "if you continue". Paul Cyr 13:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you believe that I didn't know it? --Irgendwer 13:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Given the fact that you said I said something I never did, you didn't know it. Paul Cyr 22:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * What you believe that I didn't know is not the same as I said something you never did. --Irgendwer 22:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know whether or not English is your first language, but that comment made no sense to me. Please rephrase it. Paul Cyr 23:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yours to me, too. The whole sections you have opened here are superfluous. Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. --Irgendwer 05:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * If you feel I violated WP:POINT, then report it on WP:AN. I doubt many people anyone would agree that me asking you to behave on your talk page is disrupting Wikipedia. Paul Cyr 17:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours
You have been blocked for personal attacks on others and for continually picking fights and getting into edit and other wars. This is not a "sport" nor is it a "game". Wikipedia is not a message board or a place where confrontational styles are tolerated. The idea is for all of us to work together for a common good. This block is intended to be instructive, not punitive. Try to listen to others. And. You can change accounts if you wish, but that will not give you a "do over". It doesn't work that way. Whatever actions you have taken under this username will carry over to the new one. Just try to listen. We're here to help you learn what works and what doesn't. I just decided that something more drastic than talking was necessary. --Woohookitty(meow) 21:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * If you are using sockpuppets, please cease. We will track them down and block you. It's a pointless thing to do. --Woohookitty(meow) 21:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Block has been extended to indefinite. --Woohookitty(meow) 17:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

title: User talk:Irgendwer


text:
Wilhelm Worringer

Wilhelm Robert Worringer (13 January 1881 in Aachen – 29 March 1965 in Munich) was a German art historian known for his theories about abstract art and its relation to avant-garde movements such as German Expressionism. Through his influence on the art critic T. E. Hulme, his ideas were influential in the development of early British modernism, especially Vorticism.

Biography
Worringer studied art history in Freiburg, Berlin, and Munich before moving to Bern, where he got his Ph.D. in 1907. His thesis was published the following year under the title Abstraction and Empathy: Essay in the Psychology of Style and remains his best-known work.

He taught at Bern University from 1909 to 1914. During this period he got to know members of the Blue Rider group, and he worked with his sister Emmy Worringer to arrange lectures and exhibitions at the avant-garde artists' association known as the Gereonsklub. In 1907 he married Marta Schmitz, a friend of Emmy's who later became a well-known and successful Expressionist artist under her married name of Marta Worringer.

After doing military service in World War I, he taught for some years at Bonn University, where he became a professor in 1920. One of his students there was Heinrich Lützeler. Around this time, his interest in avant-garde art began to wane as his interest in German philosophy waxed. He later taught at the universities of Königsberg (1928–44) and Halle (1946–50). In 1950, he moved to Munich, where he remained for the rest of his life.

Works
In Worringer's first book, the widely read and influential Abstraction and Empathy, he divided art into two kinds: the art of abstraction (which in the past was associated with a more 'primitive' world view) and the art of empathy (which had been associated with realism in the broadest sense of the word, and which was dominant in European art since the Renaissance). Worringer argued, however, that abstract art was in no way inferior to realist art and was worthy of respect in its own right. Following the Austrian art historian Alois Riegl, he argued that what he called "the urge to abstraction" arises not because of cultural incompetence at mimesis but out of a "psychological need to represent objects in a more spiritual manner". This turned out to be a broadly appealing justification for the increased use of abstraction in early 20th century European art. Christopher Wood wrote, in 2019, that "Empathy was Worringer's code word for the materialism and consumerism of nineteenth-century life."

Worringer posited a direct relationship between the perception of art and the individual. His claim that "we sense ourselves in the forms of a work of art" led to a formula, "The aesthetic sense is an objectivized sense of the self." He also stated, "Just as the desire for empathy as the basis for aesthetic experience finds satisfaction in organic beauty, so the desire for abstraction finds its beauty in the life-renouncing inorganic, in the crystalline, in a word, in all abstract regularity and necessity."

Abstraction and Empathy was widely discussed and was especially influential among the German artists of Die Brücke; it also helped spur growing interest in the art of Africa and Southeast Asia. He is credited by philosopher Gilles Deleuze in A Thousand Plateaus as being the first person to see abstraction "as the very beginning of art or the first expression of an artistic will."

His second book, Form in the Gothic (1911) expanded on ideas in the concluding section of his first book. Focused on Gothic art and architecture, it drew sharp distinctions between northern and southern European versions of the style. He wrote several more books, but none caught on to the same extent as the first two. He consistently championed northern, especially Germanic, forms and styles over those from the Mediterranean, and like fellow art historian Heinrich Wölfflin he argued that there was a German style of art that reflected the national character. Some of his ideas were used to prop up Nazism's racialized aesthetics, although the Nazis rejected the German Expressionist art he favored, terming it 'degenerate art'.

Publications

 * Abstraction and Empathy (Abstraktion und Einfühlung, 1907)
 * Form in the Gothic (Formprobleme der Gotik, 1911)
 * Old German Book Illustration (Die altdeutsche Buchillustration, 1912)
 * Egyptian Art (Agyptische Kunst, 1927)
 * Greek and Gothic (Griechentum und Gotik, 1928)

Family
In 1907, he married Marta Schmitz, a friend of his sister Emmy, who became known as an artist under her married name of Marta Worringer. They had three daughters.

title: Wilhelm Worringer


text:
User talk:Jrlevine

Welcome!
Hello , and a belated Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes ( ~   ) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!   Fir  e  Fo  x  19:32, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Template messages
 * Sandbox

dialing plan information
i searched through the history and the question at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Telephone_numbering_plan#dialing_plan_information relates to infomation you added. could you possiblly answer it? Plugwash 03:03, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CanadianNorth.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:CanadianNorth.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fixed.John L 19:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

callback verification
I see you have made some changes to the callback verification article. You might consider looking at the version of the article before Marc's last change where he deleted a large section. Wrs1864 (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm SK2242. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 484, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jrlevine


text:
Japanese aircraft carrier Amagi

Amagi (天城) was an Unryū-class aircraft carrier built for the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II. Named after Mount Amagi, and completed late in the war, she never embarked her complement of aircraft and spent the war in Japanese waters. The ship capsized in July 1945 after being hit multiple times during airstrikes by American carrier aircraft while moored at Kure Naval Base. Amagi was refloated in 1946 and scrapped later that year.

Design and description
The last purpose-built Japanese carrier construction during World War II was a group of vessels based on an improved JAPANESE AIRCRAFT CARRIER Hiryū design, but with individual units differing in detail reflecting the changing circumstances as the conflict in the Pacific approached its conclusion. Amagi was ordered, under the provisional name of #5001, as part of the Kai-Maru 5 Program of 1942. This was a massive naval construction program intended to replace losses suffered at the Battle of Midway and focused on aircraft and aircraft carriers. The ship was one of 16 Unryū-class aircraft carriers planned, although only three were completed before the end of the war.

Amagi had a length of 227.35 m overall. She had a beam of 22 m and a draft of 8.73 m. She displaced 20450 t. Her crew consisted of 1,595 officers and men.

The Unryū-class carriers used the same turbines and boilers as used in the heavy cruiser JAPANESE CRUISER Suzuya. These consisted of four geared steam turbine sets with a total of 152000 shp driving four shafts using steam provided by eight Kampon Type B water-tube boilers. The ship had a designed speed of 34 kn. Amagi carried 3670 t of fuel oil which gave her a range of 8000 nmi at 18 kn. She had two funnels on the starboard side, each angled below the horizontal. They were fitted with a water-cooling system to reduce the turbulence caused by hot exhaust gases.

Flight deck arrangements
Amagi's flight deck was 216.9 m long and had a maximum width of 27 m. A small island was mounted well forward on the starboard side and contained the ship's bridge and air operations control center. It was fitted with a small tripod mast that mounted one of the ship's radar antennas. The ship was designed with two superimposed hangars that were served by two aircraft elevators, each 14 by; the center elevator as used in Hiryū was deleted to simplify construction and reduce stress in the hull. The elevators had a maximum capacity of 7000 kg and took 19 seconds to go from the lower hangar to the flight deck. Amagi was fitted with hydraulically operated Type 3 arresting gear with nine cables. She also mounted three Type 3 crash barricades. No aircraft catapult was fitted. The ship mounted a retractable crane on the starboard side of the flight deck, just aft of the rear elevator. Amagi carried 397340 L of aviation gasoline for her aircraft.

The ship's air group was originally intended to consist of 12 Mitsubishi A6M Zero fighters, plus three in storage, 27 Aichi D3A Val dive bombers, plus three in reserve, and 18 Nakajima B5N "Kate" torpedo bombers plus two in crates. Amagi's hangars could not accommodate so many aircraft so eleven planes were planned to be permanently carried on the flight deck. In 1943 the air group was revised to consist of 18 Mitsubishi A7M "Sam" fighters (+2 in storage), 27 Yokosuka D4Y "Judy" dive bombers and six Nakajima C6N "Myrt" reconnaissance aircraft. Of these, the C6Ns were intended to be carried on the flight deck. When the ship commissioned in 1944, neither the A7M nor the C6Ns were yet in service, so the air group was reconfigured to consist of 27 Zeros, 12 D4Ys, three of which were to be the reconnaissance version, and nine Nakajima B6N "Jill" torpedo bombers. By this time, however, the shortage of carrier-qualified aircrew was such that they were ordered to operate from shore bases and Amagi never embarked her air group.

Armor, armament and sensors
Amagi's waterline armored belt was 1.8 in thick over her machinery spaces and 5.5 in over her magazines. Her deck armor above the machinery was 25 mm thick, but the armor above the magazines was 2.2 in thick.

The ship's primary armament consisted of a dozen 40-caliber 12.7 cm Type 89 anti-aircraft (AA) guns in twin mounts on sponsons on the ship's sides. Amagi was initially equipped with 16 triple 25 mm Type 96 and three single AA gun mounts, most on sponsons along the sides of the hull. By the end of the war, the ship mounted 22 triple and 23 single mounts. These guns were supplemented by six 12 cm 28-round AA rocket launchers. For defense against submarines, the carrier was fitted with six depth charge throwers and carried between six and ten depth charges for them.

Two Type 94 high-angle fire-control directors, one on each side of the ship, were fitted to control the Type 89 guns. Each director mounted a 4.5 m rangefinder. Six Type 95 directors controlled the 25 mm guns and the rocket launchers. Early warning was provided by two Type 2, Mark 2, Model 1 air search radars. One of these was mounted on the top of the island while the other retracted into the port side of the flight deck, between the two elevators. In addition, Amagi had two smaller Type 3, Mark 1, Model 3 air search radars, one mounted on the tripod mast on the island and the other on the aft starboard retractable radio mast.

Service

Amagi's keel was laid down by Mitsubishi in Nagasaki, on 1 October 1942. She was launched on 15 October 1943 and completed on 10 August 1944. The ship was transferred among a number of ports on the Inland Sea until she arrived in Kure in February 1945 and was ordered to be camouflaged. Her intended air group, Air Group 601, was committed to the Battle of Iwo Jima about that same time. Amagi was briefly refitted from 10 to 24 February. On 19 March, the ship was attacked by aircraft from Task Force 58 and lightly damaged by one bomb that struck the edge of the flight deck. On 13 April, the ship was permanently moored at an island in Kure harbor and extensively camouflaged.

This did not prevent the aircraft from Task Force 38 from locating and attacking the ship on 24 July. She was hit twice and experienced several near-misses. A 500 lb bomb detonated near the rear funnel, severely damaging it, but doing little other damage aside from blowing a small hole in the starboard hull. A 2000 lb bomb penetrated the flight deck and detonated in the upper hangar, between the elevators. The explosion blew a 50 m section of a hangar wall overboard and the walls of the upper hangar deck were bulged and perforated multiple times. The flight deck between the elevators was bulged up and buckled for a length of 200 ft and the forward elevator was dropped to the bottom of its shaft. It also blew a 25 ft hole in the upper hangar deck. Fragments from the explosion penetrated into the bowels of the ship, penetrating bulkheads and decks below. Fragments from near-misses penetrated the sides of the port hull and caused the forward bomb magazine, two boiler rooms, and the aft port engine room to flood.

The captain ordered the ship abandoned later in the day, and the carrier was still afloat in the evening, albeit with a slight list to port and down by the bow. Over the next couple of days, more compartments in the ship flooded and she settled on the bottom of the harbor. Another attack on 28 July hit her several more times and the resulting damage from those hits and more near-misses to port caused the ship to list further to port. This gradually increased through the next day until Amagi capsized at 10:00 on the morning of 29 July with part of her flight deck falling overboard. The losses among the ship's crew are unknown, but were supposedly light.

The ship was stricken from the Navy List on 30 November and salvage work began on 5 December. The holes in the ship's hull had to be sealed to pump the water out and decrease her draft. The remains of her flight deck and upper hangar could not be made watertight and were removed using dynamite. Pontoons were used to right the ship and she was refloated on 31 July 1946. The salvage job was conducted by the Hitachi Zosen facility in Kure and they scrapped the ship afterward. The job was completed by 12 December 1947.

title: Japanese aircraft carrier Amagi


text: User talk:66.172.168.2

title: User talk:66.172.168.2


text:
Hellbender (disambiguation)

The hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis), also known as the hellbender salamander, is a species of giant salamander that is native to eastern North America.

Hellbender or Hellbenders may also refer to:

 * Hellbender (video game), a 1996 futuristic flight simulator
 * Hellbenders (film), a 2012 American comedy horror film
 * Hellbender (film), a 2021 horror film
 * Hellbenders, a 2012 animated web-series created by Zach Hadel and Chris O'Neill
 * The Hellbenders (I crudeli, 1967), a spaghetti western directed by Sergio Corbucci

title: Hellbender (disambiguation)


text: Category:World War II aircraft carriers of Japan