text:
User talk:Nije bitno...

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image Tagging Image:Commie.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Commie.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or fairuse. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Kaiserb 04:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Lepi su ti ovi clanci o crnogorskim gradovima, ali brate pobrisase ti ljudi sve slike. Jel ti treba pomoc oko toga? Nikola 11:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Why remove Podgorica map?
I am wondering why you removed the map from the Podgorica article. I firmly believe that most native English-speakers are very unfamiliar with the Balkans and a map is indispensible. I will revert Podgorica to its earlier version. Thanks. Madman 19:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Uhhh
What's this arguement regrding the Montenegrins article? --HolyRomanEmperor 17:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Ansuman patnaik
Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions do not assert the notability of their subjects and have been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --W.marsh 13:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Wrong liscenses
Almost all your images have the wrong liscense. If you don't find an appropriate one, they will be deleted. Sasquatch t|c 22:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

CG Wikipedia
Hey Nije bitno..., there is currently a vote for a version of Wikipedia in Montenegrin. If you want to vote, go to Requests for new languages. There you can vote. Ask your friends on Wikipedia (if you have any) who haven't voted to vote. Thanks. Crna Gora ( Talk / Contribs /Edit Count) 21:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Milo Djukanovic
I saw your message on the Milo Djukanovic talk page. I agree that the article is biased against him. I actually removed some of it in my edits on June 6, but there is still a lot left. I look forward to seeing your upcoming edits to the article. Just be careful to cite sources and don't delete all the criticisms. Academic Challenger 22:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BudvaRivieraMap.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:BudvaRivieraMap.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Sozina_tunnel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sozina_tunnel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Could you please...
Please read up WP:POV and WP:NPOV. You don't follow those rules... --HolyRomanEmperor 08:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Decimalna tačka
Aj' molim te nemoj mijenjati decimalne tačke u zareze. Ovo je engleska vikipedija. Duja 14:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ma ok što se podataka tiče, neću ni da provjeravam., ti podaci su bili kupljeni ko zna iz kojih preliminarnih izvora... http://www.njegos.cg.yu čini mi se. Mislio sam da si krenuo da sistematski "ispraviš" zareze pa reko' da te spriječim dok nisi "popravio" sve. Duja 14:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Dobro
Pogledaj Talk:Podgorica_Assembly, brate sokole.

 * P. S. - da kazem nesto o sebi - razgovaras s jednom osobom koja je tu negdje u medji izmedju bjelasa i zelenasa, izmedju Dukljo-montenegrina i Srba, izmedji indipendista i pro-unionista. Posto je nasa (za mene porijeklom) zemlja uvijek bila Montenegro: the Divided Land kako kaze jedan veliki engleski pisac, uvijek sam se drzao u medji. Razumijes? --HolyRomanEmperor 15:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:MontenegroRoadMap.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MontenegroRoadMap.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I reverted your attempt to change the license on this image. There's no evidence for either CopyrightedFreeUse or GFDL because you haven't given us the source of the image. You say it's from "DBO Advertising Agency." Is this image online somewhere? Did you scan it from a map? What makes you think either of those licenses applies? Thanks.  howch e  ng   {chat} 06:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It depends on the copyright laws in Montenegro, but I'm guessing that because it's relatively recent, DBO owns the copyright to the image. You used their image and in U.S. law, copyright extends to derivative works, meaning your version is still covered under their copyright (I don't know the specifics of Montenegro law but I'll bet it's similar). The only way you can create a similar map is to start with a free use version (such as Image:Montenegro municipalities.png) and draw the cities and roads on. Does that make sense? Good luck.  howch e  ng   {chat} 15:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bojan Marovic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bojan Marovic.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 13:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia in Montenegrin language
Predpostavljam da će te ovo zanimati. Glasuje se za pokretanje Wikipedije na crnogorskom jeziku. Pogledaj poveznicu. Kubura 07:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:RibnicaBridge.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:RibnicaBridge.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:RomanSquareNight.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:RomanSquareNight.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:MilleniumBridgeNight.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MilleniumBridgeNight.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:SvetiStefan.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SvetiStefan.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:NiksicCoat.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:NiksicCoat.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 13:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:CoatBA.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:CoatBA.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:MontenegroRoadMap.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MontenegroRoadMap.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  howch e  ng   {chat} 07:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

MaximusNightclub
MaximusNightclub.gif seems to be empty, so I've nommed it for speedy. --David Mestel(Talk) 19:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, so the .gif can be deleted. --David Mestel(Talk) 20:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

template
I have moved TemplateMontenegrin First League to Template:Montenegrin First League. -- RHaworth 19:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Pitanje...
Kad je Kralj Nikola napisa ONAMO NAMO,da li je sebe smatra Srbinom ili necim drugim??

Onamo pokoj naci cu dusi,kad Srbin vise ne bude rob...

E zato ste jadni i bedni,dodji vamo u Vasojevice da vidjis kaka je ova vasa nezavisna drzava oca vam jebem izdajnickog ,izdali ste i Kralja Nikolu i sebe

 * Potpisi se (kucaj Nije bitno... 09:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)). I opusti se malo...

Pozdrav od kolege
Sto se cini? E'o nista... Skoci ponekad kad nadjes malo vremena na Montenegrins, Montenegrin language, Petar I Petrovic Njegos, Knjaz Danilo itd. Pokusavam neke stvari da pomjerim ali ide dosta mucno.Momisan 12:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Bar-Position.PNG
It's great that you updated Montenegro maps. However, there seems to be a problem with Image:Bar-Position.PNG. I don't see the image neither in Firefox nor in IE6, although the thumb in Commons:Category:Maps of Montenegro is OK. I'm not sure whether it's something wrong with my browser, or the image was corrupted somehow (it's the first in alphabetic order); could you check and re-upload if necessary? Duja 07:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

 * I fixed Berane, Kotor, Andrijevica and Mojkovac images; I don't know what was wrong, but they didn't display correctly in the articles, so I just re-exported and re-uploaded them. Duja

Copyright problems with Image:MaximusNightclub.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:MaximusNightclub.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Indon ( reply ) — 02:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, Nije Bitno, what's up. I needed a favor from you since you started up that Vraka article. Can you dig up some information on Montenegrins in Albania for me because apparently you know about it more than I do. Thanks again. Bye --Crna Gora 20:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

CG Wiki
I've started up a CG Wiki at cgwiki.elwiki.com (it'll become a seperate website once it gets 10 articles, and it's for free). If you would like, you can join it (you can become a bureaucrat and a SysOp), though I will need extreeeeeeme heeeeeeeeelp!!!!!!!. And, it's written in the Montenegrin language as intended. Think about it and if yes, come join and help out. Please, just do follow the rules of the Montenegrin language on the wiki when contributing. Bye. --Crna Gora 04:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:CoatBD.gif, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 13:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Montenegrin Wikipedia
| Montenegrin Wikipedia Proposal Please vote.Cheers! Sideshow Bob 23:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Logo-TelecomMontenegro.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-TelecomMontenegro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:PGairport exterior 2.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:PGairport exterior 2.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:T-Com logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:T-Com logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dan-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dan-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:440_pogled_ajfelovog_tornja.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:440_pogled_ajfelovog_tornja.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo
Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. — Nightstallion 15:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Creation of Yugoslavia
In this article it is writen how Montenegro has become part of Yugoslavia. Now I from Croatia and Pax from Serbia are having discussion about that. In my thinking we need Montenegrin users to write about Montenegro. Be free to enter discussion on talk page. -—Rjecina 15:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

A View from the Eiffel Tower - Gramatika i Speling
Zdravo, molim te pogledaj strnicu koju si napravio A View from the Eiffel Tower. Popravio sam neke greske u gramatici i speling-u, ako ima nekih drugih podataka kojih si dodao na wikipediju, molim te reci mi, mogu i te malo projevriti. Pozdrav. Zlatko 21:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:LYPG diagram.png
Thanks for uploading Image:LYPG diagram.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 12:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VektraLogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:VektraLogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KKBuducnost.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KKBuducnost.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Montenegro
Hi there, your edit to the Montenegro page has been reverted by another editor and then by me. The language of Montenegro is highly contested and the first sentence is a compromise agreement after discussion on the talk page. If you wish to change it, may I ask that you go to the talk page. Thanks. Woody (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dan-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dan-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:LYPG diagram.png
Hi Nije bitno...!

We thank you for uploading Image:LYPG diagram.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:PGairport.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:PGairport.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:PGairport.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:PGairport.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:PGairport.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:PGairport.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Niels? ennl 15:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Plantaze-logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Plantaze-logo.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:PG neighbourhoods.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:PG neighbourhoods.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

 * I noticed this image on the List of Podgorica neighbourhoods and suburbs article and I must mention that the imagery on Google Earth is copyrighted and so are all works derising from it. It would be best to create a SVG image of municipality borders without the overlay to bypass the copyright requirements. Admiral Norton (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Zašto?
Zašto nemate korisničku stranicu na wikipediji? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boskoigic (talk • contribs) 18:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Smatrao sam da je prioritet napraviti kvalitetnu englesku verziju, jer je ona ipak najviše korišćena, najviše prevođena na druge jezike i sl. Upravo je i u zapadnim zemljama prisutno najmanje informacija i najviše predrasuda kad je Balkan u pitanju, pa sam iz tog razloga davao doprinos uglavnom EN wikipediji. Nije bitno... (talk) 11:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD
An article of yours is in AfD: Articles for deletion/Maximus (nightclub). Joe Chill (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Coat of Arms of Kotor. Firstly thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic one which we already have a page - :. Your enthusiasm is fantastic, but unfortunately your article has been nominated for deletion in accordance with our policies. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we'd love for you to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at : - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest this deletion by adding to the top of the article you created (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on Talk:Coat of Arms of Kotor explaining your position, although an administrator may still believe deletion to be necessary. Regardless, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, as doing such often creates unnecessary confusion. If you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Hang in there and try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —ShadowRanger (talk 18:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Nije bitno...! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ivan Strugar -

Visa
Hey, what's up? I wanted to ask you if there is a way to have different version of Star Alliance page. What I mean is all the info we gather for Visa is from this web site: http://www.staralliance.com/en/services/visa-and-health/

But now when you click "Get Information" it shows at the same page so you can't link it like this one: http://www.timaticweb.com/cgi-bin/tim_website_client.cgi?SpecData=1&VISA=1&HEALTH=1&NA=RS&AR=00&DE=BD&EM=RS&TR=00&VT=00&PASSTYPES=TYPE&user=STAR&subuser=STAR

Any solutions? Rave92 (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:KAPlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KAPlogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 08:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bojan Marovic.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bojan Marovic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NortyNort (Holla) 11:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LAM-logo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:LAM-logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cineplexx Cinemas

The article Cineplexx Cinemas has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —EncMstr (talk) 04:25, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Vijesti-5June2006.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vijesti-5June2006.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tivat Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crosswinds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:30, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hotel Splendid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Varvari

The article Varvari has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 07:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BudvaRivieraMap.gif

A tag has been placed on File:BudvaRivieraMap.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

File:NewFlagPG.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewFlagPG.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:30, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:NewFlagPG.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NewFlagPG.jpg, which you've attributed to Srdjan Marlovic. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Podgorica Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=593614227 your edit] to Tivat Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:44, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Tivat airport is located right next to the city of Tivat, {convert|7|km|mi|abbr=on} from the center of Kotor, and some 19 km north-west of Budva, one

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Budva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Budva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petrovac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DeltaMontenegro.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DeltaMontenegro.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Demographics of Podgorica) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Demographics of Podgorica, Nije bitno...!

Wikipedia editor Human3015 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice work. Thanks."

To reply, leave a comment on Human3015's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

File permission problem with File:NewCoatPG.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NewCoatPG.jpg, which you've attributed to Srdjan Marlovic. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Pruga Podgorica - Nikšić
Nije bitno, može li se znati izvor odakle je pisan članak? Napisao bih o pruzi članak na hr.wikipediji, ali sam što se tiče izvora - nula bodova. Prvenstveno mislim na tehničke značajke pruge, ali i ostalo.-- Ma  ▀ ▄  Ga  11:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Ej, vidi ovo!
Ne briši. Lijep pozdrav Uspjeh je ključ života (talk) 13:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Podgorica Aluminium Plant logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Podgorica Aluminium Plant logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VOLI company logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VOLI company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Plantaze-logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Plantaze-logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Podgorica Montenegro.jpg

The file File:Podgorica Montenegro.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Budva Montenegro.jpg

The file File:Budva Montenegro.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nije bitno...


text:
Jim Ed Brown

James Edward Brown (April 1, 1934 – June 11, 2015) was an American country singer-songwriter who achieved fame in the 1950s with his two sisters as a member of the Browns. He later had a successful solo career from 1965 to 1974, followed by a string of major duet hits with fellow country music vocalist Helen Cornelius, through 1981. Brown was also the host of the Country Music Greats Radio Show, a syndicated country music program from Nashville, Tennessee.

Biography
Jim Ed was born on April 1, 1934, in Sparkman, Arkansas, to Floyd and Birdie Brown. His parents owned a farm and his father also worked at a sawmill. As small children, Jim and his sisters, Maxine and Bonnie, moved with their parents to Pine Bluff, Arkansas. As young adults, the three siblings sang together and individually. This changed in 1954 when Jim Ed and Maxine signed a recording contract as a duo. They earned national recognition and a guest spot on Ernest Tubb's radio show for their humorous song "Looking Back To See", which hit the top ten and stayed on the charts through the summer of 1954.

The Browns
Jim Ed and Maxine were joined in 1955 by 18-year-old Bonnie, and The Browns began performing on Louisiana Hayride in Shreveport, Louisiana. By the end of 1955, the trio were appearing on KWTO-AM in Springfield, Missouri, and had another top ten hit with "Here Today and Gone Tomorrow", which got a boost by their national appearances on ABC-TV's Ozark Jubilee. They signed with RCA Victor in 1956, and soon had two major hits, "I Take the Chance" and "I Heard the Bluebirds Sing". When Jim Ed was drafted in 1957, the group continued to record while he was on leave, and sister Norma filled in for him on tours. He was stationed at Fort Carson, Colorado.

In 1959, The Browns scored their biggest hit when their folk-pop single "The Three Bells" reached No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 pop and country charts. The song also peaked at No. 10 on Billboard's Rhythm and Blues listing. Remakes of the pop hits "Scarlet Ribbons" and "The Old Lamplighter" continued the hit streak, reaching the top 15 on Billboard's Pop and Country surveys. The trio had moderate successes on the country music charts for seven years thereafter. In 1963, they joined the Grand Ole Opry and in 1967 the group disbanded.

Solo career
Brown continued to record for RCA Victor and had a number of country hits, starting in 1965 while still with his sisters. In 1967, he released his first solo top ten hit, "Pop a Top", which became his signature song. Beginning in 1969, he also gained his own syndicated TV series "The Country Place", which would become famous for introducing Crystal Gayle. The show ended in 1971. In 1970, he gained a crossover hit with "Morning" which went to No. 4 on the country charts and No. 47 on the pop charts. Other hits included "Angel's Sunday" (1971), "Southern Loving" (1973), "Sometime Sunshine" (1974) and "It's That Time Of Night" (1974).

Beginning in 1976, Brown released a string of major duet hits with Helen Cornelius starting with the No. 1 hit, "I Don't Want to Have to Marry You". Other hits for the duo included "Saying Hello, Saying I Love You, Saying Goodbye" (1977), "Born Believer" (1977), "I'll Never Be Free" (1978), "If the World Ran Out of Love Tonight" (1978), "You Don't Bring Me Flowers" (a cover of the then-recent Neil Diamond-Barbra Streisand hit) (1979), "Lying In Love With You" (1979), "Fools" (1979), "Morning Comes Too Early" (1980) and "Don't Bother to Knock" (1981).

Brown hosted the syndicated country television show Nashville on the Road, along with Jerry Clower, Helen Cornelius, and Wendy Holcombe. The entire cast was replaced in 1981. The new host, Jim Stafford, kept hosting it until it ended in 1983. Brown also hosted The Nashville Network programs You Can Be A Star (a talent show) and Going Our Way, which featured Brown and his wife Becky traveling the U.S. in an RV. Brown and his wife lived in the south Nashville suburb of Brentwood, Tennessee.

Radio host
Brown hosted two nationally syndicated country music radio shows, the weekly two-hour Country Music Greats Radio Show and the weekday short-form vignette, Country Music Greats Radio Minute. Both were broadcast by over 300 radio stations to a weekly audience exceeding three million, as well as on the Internet. Recorded at the Hard Scuffle Studios in Nashville, the Country Music Greats Radio Show blended music from the 1940s through the 1990s with an interview archive of country stars past and present. Brown also told tales of living and working in the country music industry.

Dollar General Stores Spokesperson
Beginning in 1975, Brown became a national spokesperson for the Dollar General Stores discount retailer. He appeared in frequent TV advertisements using the slogan, "Every day is dollar day at your Dollar General Store," and an autographed photo hung behind the cash register at many stores.

Grand Ole Opry
An active and popular member of the Grand Ole Opry since 1963, Jim Ed Brown would remain so until his death. He would occasionally reunite there with Helen Cornelius to perform their hit duets together.

Country Music Hall of Fame
In March 2015, it was announced that the Browns would be inducted into the Country Music Hall of Fame later in the year. With his health declining, Brown was inducted in June.

Illness and death
Brown announced in September 2014 that he had been diagnosed with lung cancer and had temporarily retired from hosting his radio programs to undergo treatment. By early 2015 he was in remission and returned to hosting his radio programs. However, on June 3, 2015, he stated that the cancer had returned. Brown died a week later on June 11, 2015, at the age of 81.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Jim Ed Brown


text: Talk:List of Montreal Canadiens records

title: Talk:List of Montreal Canadiens records


text: User talk:66.162.225.66

title: User talk:66.162.225.66


text:
I Am the Resurrection

"I Am the Resurrection" is a song by the Stone Roses and the final song on the UK version of their debut album.

The last four minutes of the song is an instrumental outro. The single was released on 30 March 1992, and reached number 33 on the UK Singles Chart. It was the second of two singles released from their début album while the band were estranged from their label Silvertone.

Background
Regarding the song's origin, drummer Reni revealed the track originated when bassist Mani played the riff of The Beatles' "Taxman" backwards. Reni said, "Mani would play the riff backwards during sound-checks and we played along over the top for a laugh. Finally we said, Let's do this joke-song properly and see what happens."

Artwork
John Squire designed the "I Am the Resurrection" cover, (an up-close shot from the cover of the first album) continuing the Jackson Pollock-influenced theme of singles from The Stone Roses.

Reception
Q magazine placed it at number 10 in its list of the 100 Greatest Guitar Tracks.

NME magazine placed "I Am the Resurrection" at number 8 in its list of the 50 Greatest Indie Anthems Ever. NME also placed it at number 100 in its list of the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time.

Religious and Messianic language
Biblical scholar James Crossley has noted the biblical language throughout the song, where the singer takes on the role of a Christ-like or God-like figure ("I am the resurrection and I am the life"). In addition to the title alluding to John 11, he argues that there are references to stubbornness and repentance found in the prophetic literature of the Old Testament, which repeatedly uses the language of "turning" to God, and persistence and redemption in the New Testament, which uses the language of knocking at doors (e.g. Luke 11:5-10; Luke 13:23-27). In Crossley's view, the song partly functions as "a story of God and Israel/humanity in the Bible" but now "applied to a human relationship".

Track listings
7-inch vinyl (Silvertone ORE 40), cassette (Silvertone ORE 40C)
 * 1) "I Am the Resurrection" (Pan and Scan Radio Version) (3:45)
 * 2) "I Am the Resurrection" (Highly Resurrected Dub) (3:30)

12-inch vinyl (Silvertone ORE T 40)
 * 1) "I Am the Resurrection" (Extended 16:9 Ratio Club Mix) by Simon Harris (8:22)
 * 2) "I Am the Resurrection" (Original LP version) (8:12)
 * 3) "Fools Gold" (Bottom Won Mix) (6:59)

CD (Silvertone ORE CD 40)
 * 1) "I Am the Resurrection" (Pan and Scan Radio Version) by Simon Harris (3:45)
 * 2) "I Am the Resurrection" (5:3 Stoned Out Club Mix) (5:40)
 * 3) "I Am the Resurrection" (Original LP version) (8:12)
 * 4) "Fools Gold" (Bottom Won Mix) (6:59)

title: I Am the Resurrection


text: User talk:68.44.63.229

title: User talk:68.44.63.229


text:
William Wells Newell

William Wells Newell (1839–1907) was an American folklorist, school teacher, minister and philosophy professor.

Biography
Newell was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He graduated from Harvard College and Harvard Divinity School. After trying his hand at ministry, he was a faculty member at the new philosophy department at Harvard University for a few years. However, the bulk of Newell's career was as a school teacher. He taught at the Wells Schoolfounded by his grandfather, William Wellssituated on Elmwood Avenue. Newell founded the American Folklore Society in 1888 where he edited the Journal of American Folklore. His best known work is Games and Songs of American Children (1883, Mineola, N. Y.). The songs included tunes with the lyrics, and this book is the first collection of the folk music of American children. Dover Publications of New York published a reprint edition (with a new introduction and index by Carl Withers; ISBN 0-486-20354-9); Nabu Press published the book again in 2010 (ISBN 978-1-145-39322-6).

Legacy
The American Folklore Society's Children's Folklore Section awards the annual W. W. Newell Prize, which is presented for the best student essay.

title: William Wells Newell


text:
Talk:Terra cotta (color)

Articles for Deletion debate
This article was merged with and redirected to Terra cotta as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash talk 18:14, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Terra cotta (color)


text:
Talk:United Auto Workers

First President
The first president was Francis J. Williams, not Frances. https://uaw.org/presidents-day/ John Paul Parks (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Apply Lock Up for this Article
The criticism part is very bias to UAW now, and has a lot of undo/do history show fighting in the past 2 monthes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynxlea (talk • contribs) 02:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree completely. Huge bias now to UAW, which is funny as it is a criticism section. I will tag it with POV template and agree that it should be locked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanstandrd (talk • contribs) 16:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * note failure in one year to provide any precise complaints of POV. Rjensen (talk) 16:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Criticism Section badly POV
I had just looked at the criticism section and have found it to be terribly POV in terms of its orientation in language. I wonder why this hasn't been caught before, but it is quite obvious that someone is effectively making that section ideologically oriented to the auto-industry with subtle language - for example "Some blame the UAW for the automotive industry crisis of 2008-2009 and they would be correct," "Others conclude that the costs imposed by labor had little to do with the problems in the auto industry but this unrealistic," "The UAW wants you to believe that the primary cause of the automotive sector's weakness was substantially more expensive fuel costs."

I have edited these sentence to obviously take out the ideological orientation of the section. I would ask an admin to watch for any such attempts to undermine the neutrality of this article.--Riot Fred (talk) 22:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

 * I would suggest changing the section title from "Criticism" to something like "Labor Costs Debate". There are lengthy discussion about these issues on the wikipedia pages Effects_of_the_2008-2009_automotive_industry_crisis_on_the_United_States and/or Automotive_industry_crisis_of_2008-2009.  Although the issues are important for the current economic situation, they don't need to take up so much space in the general article on the UAW, which has to cover everything from the 1930s on. 149.142.112.2 (talk) 21:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)  (this comment was posted by user Toby Higbie  Toby Higbie (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)).

 * I noticed that this is now the opposite case. The criticism section is now talking about the good things that teh UAW is doing for the automakers.  I'm removing that information because it DOES NOT belong in the 'criticism' section. Bill Heller (talk) 02:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

What's with the phrase "overly generous"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.181.93.23 (talk) 21:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

SUV makers
The article says that the reason that the Big 3 failed was because they made SUV's and larger vehicles. It fails to mention that the choice of making larger vehicles is driven primarily by labour: margins on larger vehicles (such as SUVs) are much higher which allows more expensive unionised labour to be used.

One Party State?
This phrasing, near the end of the History section, is unsourced and seems to violate NPOV:

The union is essentially a 'one party state' controlled from top to bottom by the Administative Caucus which chooses International officers seven months prior to their actual election at a quadrennial election held in June.

Unless sourcing can be found for this, I would suggest it be stricken from the article. Robert cruickshank 04:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

 * I went ahead and removed that text. If someone can find sourcing for the statement and shows how it does not violate NPOV, then we can consider returning it. Robert cruickshank 01:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Are there any PBS or BBC documentary vidoes about UAW?
They have bankrupted 3 companies, wasted more than 300 billions tax payers money, at least we could know some history about this organization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.82.128 (talk) 01:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

What about foreign owned plants in USA?
The article sort of peters out in the 1970s...there's nothing in here about the UAW's drives to unionize plants owned by Japanese and German automakers. Is that information elsewhere? If so it should be linked from here, otherwise it should be compiled. It seems to me that the Big 3 are making good cars (ranked best in class by various sources), and yet they're spiraling into bankruptcy while complaining of massive pension liabilities (Damlier sold Chrysler for 1/4 of what it paid for it 9 years ago--US$8 vs. YS$36 billion--and along with that comes US$19 billion in underfunded pension debt), while everyone else is moving auto production to the US because it's cheaper to make the cars here. It looks to me like the UAW is a parasite that's nearly killed off its host. Yes, that's POV, and that's why I'm not jumping to edit the article. On the other hand, maybe that's the truth, and if so, it should be in there... scot 21:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I would also like to see this article expanded because I, too, have heard many people expressing a sentiment that the UAW is killing US car makers through the overwrought compensation they've garnered for their members. True or not, it ought to be mentioned in the article. RobertM525 11:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Union or no union, the cost of living is still too high in this country for the automaker's tastes. The jobs would've gone anyway, but foreign companies are NOT manufacturing here because its cheaper (Japan artifically keeps its currency down), but for political reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.15.101 (talk • contribs)

 * Then why haven't any of these plants unionized? If it were politically motivated, then having the Unions on their side would be a plus, as they are a significant lobbying force.  And unions really do add to the cost:  But with benefits, one industry researcher estimates Toyota’s total labor costs to be about $35/hour, versus $81/hour for GM, including its legacy retirement and healthcare costs. That means that if Toyota did no better than match GM’s Arlington levels of productivity, it would still have a $1000 per car cost advantage in labor alone. (from here) scot 16:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Plants in the south are difficult to organized because many southern states are so-called "right to work" states in which 1) the union is required to provide contract enforcement for all workers in the unit regardless of their membership status and 2) those who choose not to join contribute nothing toward the union. Law varies from state to state, but this would be contrasted to, say, California in which non-members still pay a proportion (a "fair-share fee") of what members do proportionate to the amount of money the local spends on contract enforcement (as opposed to political activities which only members pay for) as determined annually by a lawyer. The upshot of the right to work system is that those members within a workplace who choose to unionize wind up dissipating their resources on those who choose not to but file grievances against the employer which the union then has to spend money on. (A single labor arbitration typically costs in the thousands of dollars.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.167.234.126 (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Current Strike
Perhaps something should be said about the current strike going on in GM plants? Mcflytrap 19:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo uaw.png
Image:Logo uaw.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Cleaned up Jobs Bank Section
A union thug added several POV statements. Since there were no sources cited, I removed them. If you want to prove that UAW workers actually work when in a job bank, site a source.

--- First, the job banks section is clearly not cleaned up. It's highly incomplete and now, one sided.

I'm drawn to ask you how you ascertain that so called POV material was added by a "union thug." Did you ask them? That statement sounds at least possibly errant, at least to me.

More importantly, there is a history and context to job banks that is not being addressed here at all and is rarely if at all addressed unfortunately in the Web-based editorial world we see today. Instead, "job bank" on the Web is used as a lightning rod to direct hate toward unions and toward the U.S. auto industry as a whole.

I saw what was deleted. I suggest it be reinserted and references provided. I suggest you read these and do some (possibly off-web) historical research as well. -- RK

http://www.theheraldbulletin.com/local/local_story_338224208.html

http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=52924 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.209.83 (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Added in better statistics about UAW/nonunionized pay gap
I removed the misleading claim of UAW workers being paid $74 an hour and the outsourced comment about this making Detroit less competitive, and instead synthesized/inserted NYT's better analysis of the pay gap at the end of the article (whereas the previous figure, referring to the current situation of UAW workers, was for some reason placed between one sentence dealing with 1979 and another dealing with 1985). That's still probably not the best spot for it, but I don't have time at the moment to do much more to the article. Perhaps a "current situation" section, or at least something dealing with current controversies over the UAW, Detroit, and the would-be auto bailout? Michael Slana (talk) 22:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Why is there not a criticism section on the UAW? as part of NPOV there should be a criticism section. Also, although only one person is listed, he represents a general view on the situation. Teeninvestor (talk) 17:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

 * I just had a problem with the way the section was originally written. It seemed one sided an relied on the misleading number that workers get paid 70$ dollars an hour. It seemed like a convservative hit piece blaming the unions for all of detroits problems

 * However, you have since added more sources an information which clarifies the issue and makes it more balanced. I am fine with the way it is now and won't try to revert it any longer.annoynmous 02:49, 25 December (UTC)

 * I still find the criticism section making judgments that, while correct, are inappropriate for a NPOV. Travis Garris (talk) 17:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. the first part was written rapidly and with one source. Teeninvestor (talk) 14:06, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

a small edit
I removed the "somewhat" from front of the misleading in the criticism section. I think it's weasel-wordish to call it "somewhat misleading" when it's simply misleading to say that Autoworkers are pampered with 70 dollars hour wages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.182.194.29 (talk) 19:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

United Auto Workers Outside The U.S.
As a point of reference the United Auto Workers union is not chartered to operate outside of the United States of America, As I referenced in my edit summary in Canada auto workers and other certain unionized labor are represented by the Canadian Auto Workers union a distinct and separately chartered organization unreleated to the UAW. Rosie, Queen of Corona (talk) 17:25, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Some workers in Ontario voted not to join the CAW and remain with the UAW. Both are members of the CLC. Now 99.9% of UAW members are in the US and nearly all unionized autoworkers in Canada are CAW but those are generalities.RevelationDirect (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Correct Grammar?
Is the name in correct English Grammar? The international union, is a noun. The name simply doesn't make sense with the wrod 'union' at the beginnin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.2.36.108 (talk) 20:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Requested removal or rewrite.
Under: Criticism 4th paragraph

"Korean manufacturer Hyundai is offering to allow customers to return their new cars if they lose their jobs."

This action by Hyundai is a marketing gimmick designed to sell cars to people nervous about job losses or their nation's economy in general. It does not support the earlier statement "...that the automotive crisis extends across national boundaries, affecting car companies in Asia, Europe."99.154.104.98 (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Labor costs per car
"Nor is it clear that labor costs, which are approximately 10%[18] of a car's total cost, were the decisive factor in the decline of American automakers." This is absolutely false. The VAST majority of the costs of producing a new car are either labor (as in wages) or attributed to labor (as in pension cost, health insurance, etc.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.244.143 (talk) 06:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Apparent bias
The intro paragraph uses terms like "left wing" and "liberal wing" (and without citation), which indicates the contribution to be done with bias, I find, as if to typecast the subject with negative image.

For some of the odd claims, a questionable source is used (The UAW and the Heyday of American Liberalism). I say questionable because, according to reviews of this book, "it challenges the prevailing view among labor historians(.)" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Boyle_(historian)  Thus, a minor opinion that contrasts with all others should not be included.

This also attempts to make regular connotation between the union and communists, but only through that one source.

Looking at the editing history, I see that the claim has been removed before, only to have it re-entered by one contributor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Regroce (talk • contribs) 16:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

This entire page is right wing union busting propaganda.
It's as if fox news bought Wikipedia. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.57.150.40 (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Tool and Die Strike of 1939
Can someone try link to this orphaned article please? Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on United Automobile Workers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090402161023/http://www.financialpost.com:80/scripts/story.html?id=1343240 to http://www.financialpost.com/scripts/story.html?id=1343240

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 06:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on United Automobile Workers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090216154211/http://www.financialpost.com/related/links/story.html?id=562830 to http://www.financialpost.com/related/links/story.html?id=562830
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080317160749/http://www.caw.ca/whoweare/ourhistory/cawhistory/index.html to http://www.caw.ca/whoweare/ourhistory/cawhistory/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United Automobile Workers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101008175850/http://www.uaw.org/node/39 to http://www.uaw.org/node/39

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:08, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 18 February 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 11:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

United Automobile Workers → United Auto Workers – This is the bigtime WP:COMMONNAME but which also happens to be WP:CONCISE. – MJL  ‐Talk‐☖ 06:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Support - per ngram. — Amakuru (talk) 12:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Support common name. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Right to strike in contact
My local UAW 3063 in Hopkinsville, Kentucky owned by Metalsa has never had the right to strike in any contract since the UAW came in. Without this bargaining tool we have nothing to use if the company is doing something wrong. With that being said, tell me why you would even allow this to take place? We pay dues and work very hard and expect the representatives to inform the members of this Union the importance of the right to strike in our contract. I am not a lone wolf in this question. Many of my fellow members wonder the same thing. So I would love an explanation why you continue to let this happen!! Please feel free to contact me with your explanation. (270) 206-5989 107.77.232.176 (talk) 09:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:United Auto Workers


text:
Articulata

Articulata is a Latin word meaning articulated or jointed. In taxonomy, it is used to refer to various subdivisions.

It may refer to:
 * Articulata (Brachiopoda), one of two main divisions of the brachiopods having two valves with an articulating hinge
 * Articulata (Crinoidea), a subclass of crinoids, the only such to survive past the Paleozoic era
 * Articulata (Cyclostomata), a group of cyclostome bryozoans, also known as Articulina
 * Articulata hypothesis, a hypothesis treating Annelida and Panarthropoda as sister taxa

title: Articulata


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spicewood

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE per the author's request. -Splash talk 00:48, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Spicewood
A lovely fairy tale, but wikipedia has no place for this. Nice try though. BorgQueen 18:15, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Here is another one... "Once upon a time I voted to Delete some patent nonsense". I will admit the part about the baby sandwiches made me laugh though.--Isotope23 19:03, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, you can delete it if you want (and you definitely should)... but I was looking up what rootbeer was made of (because who knows that?) and spicewood sounded like it was probably a fake thing anyway... you've got to admit it's funny... sorry, it won't happen again. I had to write an article that my friends could look up. I'll write a real article next time. Sorry and thanks for the fun
 * I've speedied this as CSD:G7 per the author's comments above (verified IP of comments matches article's author).--Isotope23 20:38, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Tomas De Aquino~enwiki

Wikipedia does not need specific disclaimers for drug articles. Please stop inserting the template in articles. We have the general disclaimer, which links to a medical disclaimer very clearly. JFW | T@lk  18:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Hope Centeno
I have added a "" template to the article Hope Centeno, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black-Velvet 11:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pinoy Ako
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pinoy Ako, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No evidence of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Nazareno2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nazareno2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bluemask (talk) 09:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tomas De Aquino. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tomas De Aquino~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tomas De Aquino~enwiki


text:
G. P. Taylor

Graham Peter Taylor (born 1958 in Scarborough, North Riding of Yorkshire, England), pen-name G. P. Taylor, is the author of the best-selling novels Shadowmancer, Wormwood, and Tersias. Before taking up writing full-time, he was a police officer, motorcyclist and former rock band roadie turned Anglican vicar in the village of Cloughton, North Yorkshire. Taylor has three children and currently resides in Whitby, North Yorkshire.

Biography
Taylor grew up in Yorkshire, but moved to London in the 1970s where he worked in the music industry with such bands as The Stranglers, Sex Pistols, Elvis Costello, and Adam and the Ants. He became involved in the occult, and lived a life that was, in his own words "into all sorts of weird and wonderful things and wasn’t leading a godly life". He then turned to Christianity, and he later became a vicar with the Church of England.

Taylor completed the manuscript of his first book, Shadowmancer, which he self-published. Following its launch at Taylor's local bookshop, The Whitby Bookshop, the title garnered a publishing deal with Faber and Faber in the UK and G. P. Putnam's Sons in the United States for a further six novels, following which he resigned his position as parish priest.

His second novel, Wormwood, was nominated for a Quill Award. His third novel, Tersias was published in the UK in 2005. In August 2006, Faber published a follow-up to Shadowmancer entitled The Curse of Salamander Street.

In October 2006, Taylor released The Tizzle Sisters & Erik through Markosia. A mixture of prose and graphic novel that he deemed an 'illustronovella', Taylor was joined on the book by collaborators Tony Lee, Dan Boultwood, and Harry Potter artist Cliff Wright.

He also contributed text to photographer Mark Denton's book on the Yorkshire coast.

Taylor announced his retirement from writing in October 2009 in order to care for his daughter, who suffers from Crohn's disease, although he went on to publish three more books in the years that followed.

In 2010, the first book of Vampyre Labyrinth series, RedEye, was published. The story was based on young Jago, who is a evacuee from London in war with the Germans in 1940. He was sent to Whitby, where he discovered a series of secrets and mysteries of vampyres.

Mariah Mundi film
In 2008, Taylor signed a deal with film production company Entertainment Motion Pictures (E-Motion) to make a film based on the series. In March 2012, it was announced that the film would star Michael Sheen, Lena Headey, Sam Neill, Ioan Gruffudd, and Aneurin Barnard as Mariah Mundi. The title was changed to The Adventurer: The Curse of the Midas Box and the film opened in the United States in January 2014 to generally negative reviews.

Shadowmancer

 * Shadowmancer (2003)
 * Wormwood (2004)
 * Tersias (2005)
 * The Shadowmancer Returns: The Curse of Salamander Street (2006)

Mariah Mundi

 * Mariah Mundi - The Midas Box (2007)
 * Mariah Mundi and the Ghost Diamonds (2008)
 * Mariah Mundi and the Ship of Fools (2009)

The Dopple Ganger Chronicles

 * The First Escape (2008) (originally released as The Tizzle Sisters and Erik in 2006)
 * The Secret of Indigo Moon (2009)
 * The Great Mogul Diamond (2011)

Vampire Labyrinth

 * Redeye (September 2010)
 * Dust Blood (January 2011)
 * Oracle (July 2011)

title: G. P. Taylor