text:
Talk:Girish Karnad

Untitled
A number of websites claim that Karnad was at Magdalen College, Oxford. I found this while researching an article on John Keay, the popular historian, who apparently was roommates at Magdalen with Karnad. See www.johnkeay.com for details. --Peripatetic 15:52, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

No mention about his Dharwad background?
Would appreciate if someone could shed some light on his background in Dharwad. For eg -- he did his intermdeiate there (in Karnatak Univ?). I do know that he had chosen Hindi for his language class (this is apart from the basic curriculum) there. I believe he went to Oxford to get a degree in Mathematics. By anecdotal recollection. I believe he was involved (to what extent I don't know) in some student activism, inhis Oxford Days. He knows Marathi too, because of his North Karnataka (Bombay Presidency in his impressionable years) background. But typically, all Karnads speak Konkani at home. Any people from Bangalore/Hubli/Dharwad shed light on above-mentioned items?

Updated article including Dharwad
I've updated the article including his Dharwad background with the help of sources I found online http://www.imagi-nation.com/moonstruck/clsc79.html. Gnanapiti 00:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

comment
why you are not writing now sir? please write some play(drama) 13:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)13:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)13:47, 12 February 2007(UTC)13:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)13:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)61.246.61.169

61.246.61.169 13:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)ishwara bhat  --Saynara (talk) 02:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

reference missing
www.ourkarnataka.com is no more available.So reference number 4 is no more valid.. I do know ourkarnataka was a very good site & data is very much valid. nearest to that currently available is http://about-jati.blogspot.in/ Can I clean this up? The only hitch is this is only a blog, without references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mallikarjunasj (talk • contribs) 13:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Girish Karnad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.museindia.com/showcont.asp?id=10
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6U68ulwpb?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmha.nic.in%2Fsites%2Fupload_files%2Fmha%2Ffiles%2FLST-PDAWD-2013.pdf to http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324021011/http://mobile.usc.edu/news/story.php?id=68012 to http://mobile.usc.edu/news/story.php?id=68012
 * Added tag to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1603/16031170.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Girish Karnad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051216085327/http://www.virtualbangalore.com/Ppl/PplKarnad.php to http://www.virtualbangalore.com/Ppl/PplKarnad.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:53, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Removed unsourced/unverified material and replaced it with sourced text
The first paragraph of this article previously contained a wall of text relating to Girish Karnad's mother that was unsourced, unverified - and untrue. I have removed the text, and replaced it with a summary of his early life, sourced to the first chapter of his autobiography, which was published in Kannada (which you can see here), and translated into English by the author for Caravan Magazine, which I have included as a reference. Thank you; if you are further editing this section, please make sure that you include only verified material that can be traced to a source. --aprabhala (talk) 05:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

MoS WP:LEADCITE
As per WP:LEADCITE, there should be no need for any sources in the lead section, unless they support contentious claims. But regardless of that, all the in-line external linking in the lead section should be replaces with discrete references. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Source
Hope This source (Encyclopedia of Indian Literature) would be helpful. --Gazal world (talk) 16:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, the source is helpful but article needs massive overhaul. And ITN time has passed.-Nizil (talk) 05:42, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

He is an of legends
He is a boy 223.231.137.4 (talk) 01:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Girish Karnad


text:
Dan Armon

Dan Armon, Israeli poet, was born in Jerusalem in 1948, the year Israel gained independence. He studied literature and theater at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and has published four books of poems.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Dan Armon


text:
Sanjayan Thuraisingam

Sanjayan Thuraisingam (born 11 September 1969) is a Tamil Canadian cricketer. He is a right-handed batsman and a right-arm fast medium bowler.

Thuraisingam was Canada's top wicket-taker at the 2001 ICC Trophy and his 5 wickets for just 25 runs brought Canada's cricket team to the World Cup on 17 July 2001. He played three matches in the 2003 Cricket World Cup, and has since played a further six One Day Internationals for Canada. He has also represented them in two ICC Intercontinental Cup matches and the 2005 ICC Trophy.

title: Sanjayan Thuraisingam


text:
User talk:Simon Beavis

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers such as yourself:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Spinboy 15:54, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Image source/licensing for Image:Byers.jpg
This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:25, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Nice Smallville Update!
Hey dude thanx for such a cool update! I was thinkin of updating the music information a while ago, but I don't really have much time right now. Anyway, try to get the cover art for both cds, I guess you can find those easily (but please good quality) and don't forget to fill the respective license.

Nice job!

--Charlie144 03:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

x-files chars
I see you added the infobox to the otrher x-files characters. Great, I didn't do it becuase I didn't know what episodes they came from. Thanks --Mr. Stabs 11:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Clubhel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Clubhel.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or fairuse. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. Ingoolemo talk 18:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Elizabeth Riker
Where is Kyle Riker's wife and Will Riker's mother named Elizabeth? — J I P  | Talk 18:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Melissaadm
You did not specify the source for Image:Melissaadm.jpg. Could you please update that information so we can confirm the copyright status? Thanks, and great image. :) --Yamla 04:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lex-luthor1.jpg
Where did you get this image? I just got a nicely worded yet firm email from somebody from Warner Brothers saying that an image of Superman in the same yet-to-be-released film has *not* been released to the media yet. The rep requested deletion of that image and I complied. This is potentially very serious if Wikipedia contributed to the spread of these images before they were officially released. At the *very* least we all *need* to say exactly where we get images when uploading. --mav 18:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello
Hello do you know the creator of Beavis and Butthead Whopper 03:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Good work
Nice job on the List of rock instrumentals page, with the sorting and whatnot. It's coming along! Deckiller 00:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Lone4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lone4.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 11:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summmary
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 2% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Mission7.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission7.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 05:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It still needs a source. --Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 21:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Smallmetro.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Smallmetro.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AriGold 18:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Smalltalon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Smalltalon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AriGold 18:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I know, sorry
i just interpreted the terminated as being just overkill..... because 24 is just such a good show..... i fixed it back..... thanks anyway..... those infoboxes are excellent.......

Whopper 2
I have requested a Beavis and Butthead wiki over on Wikicities. If you are interested in contributing to it, please tell me. Whopper 22:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Whopper Info
http://beavisandbutthead.wikicities.com/wiki/Main_Page is the main link. We will hold a vote for a main page design, but you can edit anything you like. Whopper 21:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Whopper Scoop
Make sure to vote for the main page design, and next week, I am going to do mass editing. Thanks! Whopper 03:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Audrey.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Audrey.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Thuresson 16:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Lex-luthor1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lex-luthor1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 11:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I've removed the no source tag. You should read the tag which you added.  It says images should quote a source, copyright info and fair use rationale.  The image now shows the source, but nothing else.  I've removed the tag so that you have a chance to fix it without anyone coming along and deleting the image.   You should also read the articles linked from the message I sent you relating to copyright so that you understand Wikipedia's stance on copyright.  You're right - 6 months ago things were more relaxed although these rules have always been applied.  It's become stricter simply because there have been so many flagrant breaches of copyright and Wikipedia has been criticised for it in the mainstream media.  Under copyright laws both Wikipedia and the contributing editor (ie you) can be legally liable for any breach in copyright, and although nobody has tried to sue Wikipedia, the aim is to remove problematic material when detected.  Everything you need to know is in Image description page, Fair use and Copyright.  If you make yourself familiar, you can't go wrong, and let me know if you are not sure about anything.  Thanks. Rossrs 21:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

James Bond character template
As someone who works on a number of the characters, do you think we should have an "age" field in the template? I know 24 got rid of it and Alias doesn't have it either. Most villains don't have any specific data. I'm just calling attention to this because it seems like these ages get changed almost everyother week and now someone just went through and gave them all specific ages that can't be calculated.

Is there any other field that could replace this that might be an interesting fact? K1Bond007 22:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know. Some of those you mentioned, like Henderson, I knew worked for Omnicron and CTU (just as an example). For people where they have no clear job, I would say make that field optional in the template then just blank it for that character so it doesn't show. K1Bond007 20:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

X-Files question
I'm not a huge X-Files fan, but I tried to follow it for a while. There was a book that Mulder used that had something to do with the meanings of symbols. I've always wanted to buy a copy of it, but now I can't remember the name of it. Thanks for your help. -- GTWeasel 14:22, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the link. I couldn't find it on there, but I did manage to find it here: (Image1|Image2)

Image Tagging Image:Lonegunmen010214e.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lonegunmen010214e.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096 05:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

North by Northwest
Vandamm does not fall to his death. At the end, he is taken into custody. When Leonard is killed, Vandamm turns to the Professor and says something like "That wasn't very sporting." Maybe you're thinking of the second henchman. He tries to ambush Thornhill and falls to his death. Clarityfiend 05:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rchapelle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rchapelle.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 04:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Al1.jpg
Hi, your image Image:Al1.jpg is not used on any pages. Someone might have removed the image from a page it was on, or you might have not yet placed it on a page. Another problem is that you need to add the source of the image (a link to where to find it), so that people can verify its copywrite information. It has been listed as violating fair use criteria by User:Angr. Fresheneesz 05:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mission8.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission8.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mission9.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission9.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Saladdaze.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Saladdaze.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Missionaura.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Missionaura.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Missionaural.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Missionaural.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Everafterlive.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Everafterlive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Missionresurrection.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Missionresurrection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nosnow.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nosnow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mission7.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Synthteclogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Synthteclogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kbauer.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Kbauer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Bob 22:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Kbauer.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kbauer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 22:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:GeorgeMason.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GeorgeMason.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 22:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:GeorgeMason.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GeorgeMason.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 22:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Yuri Suvarov
How do you know that Yuri Suvarov will return to 24? You seem to be sure of yourself, so if you have a source, please let me know (or just add it to the article). Best, DLand TALK 03:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Pad Man
I have redirected the article to List of Prison Break minor characters as the character is a minor character in the show and has not made many appearances in the series. The subject would deserve its own article if it had a more significant role in the series and if more behind-the-scenes information could be added. Please see WP:Writing about fiction and WP:Notability for more details. Regards, Ladida 07:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:PresidentKeeler.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:PresidentKeeler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Normal 009.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Normal 009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Normal 009.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Normal 009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Beardedman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Beardedman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Calendarman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Calendarman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 23:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Normal 009.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Normal 009.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Resurgent insurgent 00:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Frohike.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Frohike.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Neron.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Neron.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:JamesNathanson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JamesNathanson.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Gravedis.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gravedis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mission6.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mission5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mission4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mission3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mission2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mission1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mission1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lone11.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lone11.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Phantasmagoria.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Phantasmagoria.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Normal 009.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Normal 009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Xsoundtrack.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Xsoundtrack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gael.jpg
I have tagged Image:Gael.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 16:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Langly.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Langly.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ejfetters 07:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Ejfetters 07:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Spear carrier
you appear to be an editor of the article of Spear carrier, and I just asked a question on its talk page. Pdbailey 17:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:JamesNathanson.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:JamesNathanson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:70salbum.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:70salbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jamminalbum.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamminalbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Minor edits
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  --EEMIV (talk) 01:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The X-Files peer review
As you're a top contributor to the X-Files article, I'd like to inform you that the article is currently undergoing a peer review. This is an effort to get the article up to featured article standards for an eventual FA nomination, in the hopes that it can be featured on Wikipedia's main page on or around the release date for the new X-Files movie entitled The X-Files: I Want to Believe. If you can, please take a look and offer input on improving the article. Thank you.  Equazcion •✗/C • 18:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

TFU expansion
I removed your good-faith expansion of the The Force Unleashed plot. I'm sure there will be -- or, perhaps, are -- reviews of the text that offer plot details. However, as the talk-page of this article and a corresponding one on Wookieepedia suggest, there are some discrepancies somewhere in the German print of the text, and some blogs/sites are otherwise passing on inaccurate story information. I think it is best to either wait for an English-language text to come out and, for the time being, cite it as a primary source or simply to offer salient details offered in third-party reviews (or perhaps even encapsulating the dust jacket summary). Many thanks! --EEMIV (talk) 02:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox 24 Character
Template:Infobox 24 Character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Godfather 2: The Game
Hi, I was just curious where you're getting your information on the GF2 game. To my knowledge, not all the info you added is public knowledge (although it *is* correct). JaySizzle (talk) 08:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Lost Planet: Extreme Condition characters and adversaries
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Lost Planet: Extreme Condition characters and adversaries, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:38, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:70salbum.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:70salbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 06:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of Assassin's Creed characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hi. Your words "Prior to his murder, Palmer had discovered a traitorous conspiracy involving Logan's Chief of Staff Walt Cummings and ex-CIA agent James Nathanson. " were edited into Martha Logan's page on Wiki on 15 February 2006. That edit's stayed there until now. I wanted to send you this kitten because I hate you because that edit also happens to be the quoted text when you Google "Logan 24", which spoiled Palmer's death for me since I'm in season 4. That is all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Martha_Logan&oldid=39763105

Countypo (talk) 08:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Count Vertigo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Beret2.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:11, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Beret2.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Beret2.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Steven Obanno for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Obanno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steven Obanno until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Luthor Superman Returns.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Luthor Superman Returns.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

title: User talk:Simon Beavis


text:
User talk:Eiler7

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers such as yourself:

 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Spinboy 15:54, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Académie des sciences morales et politiques

Some more text

Unnecessary escalation
First, my sincerest apologies for your offence to my Benedict XVI comments. I assure you it was neither my intent nor the outcome for you to be personally attacked. It is a fine line editors have to walk here; many wrongly think saying "Your logic is wrong here" is a personal attack, so sometimes I try to soften that in various ways; I regret my choice struck a raw nerve of yours. And please note that saying you "pretend"ed does not at all imply being out of touch with reality, indeed quite the opposite as that action is voluntary. Regardless of that though, sorry you took it so hard. I do regret that you didn't ask me to clarify my wording; you did say "sounds like", after all. In the spirit of my title of this section, in the future I would ask you to please ask for clarification about serious possibilities like that.

Second, the next step of a two editor dispute is to discuss on the relevant article's talk page with full participation of the community. (One could argue it should have gone there much earlier in our discussions, but all will end up the same eventually). It would be counterproductive to send this one to arbitration now, because the likely first thing that will be asked is, well what happened when consensus was sought? I will point this out on Talk too. Indeed that is why I brought it to Talk; you were not even perceiving my arguments at all (let me politely rephrase: you have shown me no evidence that you do) and perhaps only a consensus viewing of both sets would allow for distinction between them (or perhaps even a better third alternative; do not underestimate the intelligence of some of the common editors of that article!)

Let's please chill our jets. We both want a better article, indeed a better encyclopedia, don't we? Let's carry on. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 19:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Stable version
The more the merrier, I guess. :) The person we are contracting is Jörg Baach, whom you can contact through mail1 at baach dot de (yes, with the numeral). Please CC me under erik AT wikimedia DOT org. Cheers, --Eloquence* 05:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Through the Looking Glass (Lost)
Poke. --thedemonhog talk • edits 20:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Just a note
You said on ANI that you didn't know how to find out how someone is blocked. Here's how: first, you can go to someone's contributions page and click the "block log" button at the top. For instance, your log is here, and it shows that (a) you're not currently blocked, and (b) you've not been blocked in the past. Second, alternatively, you can visit Special:Ipblocklist, which is a searchable list of all currently blocked users. HTH!  > R a d i a n t <  09:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Denialism
An article that you have been involved in editing, Denialism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unomi (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Cluebot review user
✅ - Damian Zaremba (talk • contribs) 16:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Rich (MTCD) T|C|E-Mail 10:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eiler7


text:
File:50000fall.jpg

Summary
Sleeve of The Fall's greatest hits album 50,000 Fall Fans Can't Be Wrong (2004)
 * Source: http://www.visi.com/fall/discog/50,000-pic.html

title: File:50000fall.jpg


text:
Saltsjöbanan

Saltsjöbanan is an electrified suburban rail system between Stockholm and Saltsjöbaden in Nacka, Sweden. It is 18.5 km in length and has eighteen stations in use. An average of 17,200 boardings are made on an ordinary workday (2019). The line is mostly single-track (with passing loops between Nacka and Saltsjö-Järla, and between Storängen and Saltsjö-Duvnäs), and is isolated from Sweden's national railway network, although both are built to compatible. The Storstockholms Lokaltrafik (SL) classifies it as "light rail" in its maps.

From January 2023 into spring 2024, the complete Saltsjöbanan is planned to be closed for reconstruction, after the westernmost section from Henriksdal to Slussen has already been suspended since 2016.

History
K.A. Wallenberg largely initiated and financed the project. The railway's initial purpose was to offer a quick way for stressed-out Stockholm residents to get to planned beaches and recreational facilities around Saltsjöbaden. The construction of the railway went faster than expected, but turned out to be very expensive, mostly owing to the problems building the last stretch into the city, which involved a lot of tedious work with explosives to even out the ground and to build two long tunnels, one of which was the country's longest at the time of the construction. This sudden increase in costs led the tunnels to be nicknamed "Wallenberg's downfall" ("Wallenbergs undergång") for a while afterwards.

Saltsjöbanan was inaugurated on 1 July 1893 and was operated with steam locomotives until 1910 after which the lines were gradually electrified (circa 1 kV DC). The construction of the branch that runs from Igelboda to Solsidan (also called Vårgärdsbanan) was fully contracted to a Danish company, Brøchner-Larsen & Krogh. The branch opened in 1913.

Initially the railway was operated by Järnvägs AB Stockholm-Saltsjön, and carried a great deal of profitable freight traffic. This diminished with time, and by the 1960s it was no longer breaking even, and a complete closure was considered. However, the Stockholm County Council took over the line in 1969, and today it is owned by Storstockholms Lokaltrafik (SL).

To this day, the route remains mostly unchanged since the early 1900s, but has seen slight alterations at its outer ends. In the 1940s, the western end was extended by about 400 m, moving its Stockholm terminus from Stadsgården to the more centrally located Slussen interchange. Conversely, the easternmost end, which once ran all the way to the Saltsjöbaden shore, for convenient transfer to archipelago ferries, now stops about 200 m inland. A railway branch also used to go from slightly west of Östervik to a gravel pit in Snörom, a distance of about 3 km. It was however only used for industrial purposes. The branch was decommissioned as early as 1902 and all that remains today is a minor road with the same stretch. A Culemeyer trailer is stored a railway siding linked to the passing track near Storängen Station.

Until 2000, Saltsjöbanan also used to be connected to the Swedish national railway network via the Southern Main Line (link decommissioned 1954) as well as the Södra station–Hammarbyhamnen–Stadsgården freight branch line (sv:Industrispåret Södra station–Hammarbyhamnen–Stadsgården), which provided a connection to Stockholm South Station.

Due to the Slussen reconstruction project, the section between Henriksdal and Slussen was closed in 2016, making Henriksdal the temporary western terminus with a rail replacement bus running there. The line will be reopened when the reconstruction of Slussen is finished, possibly in 2026.

From January 2023 into Spring 2024, the complete Saltsjöbanan will be closed, with trains being replaced by buses. During the 15-month-closure, passing loops will be added at Fisksätra and Tattby stops, Värmdovägen road bridge near Sickla stop will be rebuilt and Sickla stop itself is modified to provide passenger interchange to Stockholm Tunnelbana's future Blå linje branch to Nacka.

Vehicles and technology
As of 2015, the trains running on Saltsjöbanan are EMU sets of two or three cars, consisting of models C10 (with motor) and C11 (motorless). These trains were manufactured by ASEA between 1975 and 1976. The cars are slight modifications to the C8 stock used on the Stockholm metro. Maximum allowed speed is 70 km/h (43 mph).

The railroad did not feature automatic train control (ATC), in contrast to most other rail traffic in Sweden, until 2019, when it was implemented after three years of construction and training. The lack of ATC made overruns such as the 2013 Saltsjöbanan train crash more likely to occur, eventually leading to the implementation of ATC. A refurbished C6 train cascaded from the Stockholm metro was therefore used to replace the damaged train as a result. As of 2022, ATC is fully implemented, with all the drivers retrained and all trains being refurbished to fit the new system, which has them now automatically braking at red signals, among the other additions to safety that come with ATC, thus making accidents such as the January 2013 one much less likely to happen.

In addition, two preserved wooden train carriages manufactured by ASEA between 1912 and 1913 are used on special occasions and can also be rented out for private events. These wooden train carriages previously served as the main rolling stock on the Saltsjöbanan until the C10 and C11 trains were introduced in 1976.

New, modern rolling stock is planned to be introduced during the second half of the 2020s, with some of the older C10/C11 trains planned to be kept while the others are due to be scrapped.

Accidents and incidents
In the early morning hours of 15 January 2013, a passenger train started to move without authorization, with only a cleaner on board. At maximum speed, it violently overran a set of buffer stops and crashed into a block of flats in Saltsjöbaden. The cleaner was first suspected of having stolen the train, but was later cleared of blame, as the train was then considered to have started moving due to some train malfunction and violation of safety procedures.

Lines
The main line runs from Slussen to Saltsjöbaden, while a branch line connects the intermediate station Igelboda to Solsidan. There is a rail replacement bus line 25B connecting Slussen and Henriksdal while the reconstruction of Slussen is in progress.

The line is predominantly single track with passing loops at some stations. There are two longer sections of double track between Nacka - Saltsjö-Järla and Storängen - Saltsjö-Duvnäs totalling 2.5 km which reduces delays waiting for trains in the opposite direction. The Solsidan branch is entirely single track.

title: Saltsjöbanan


text: User talk:210.49.63.32

title: User talk:210.49.63.32


text: File:Mangal Pandey movie poster.jpg

title: File:Mangal Pandey movie poster.jpg


text:
Talk:Anita Loos

birthdate
Various websites, notably Penguin http://www.penguin.co.uk:8000/nf/Author/AuthorPage/0,,0_1000020096,00.html claim that Anita Loos was born in 1888. —193.122.47.146 15 October 2005.
 * David Thomson's New Biographical Dictionary of Film (4th ed.: Little Brown, 2002 p. 530) gives 1891, FWIW. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 05:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

1891 is just wrong. A well known fact is that Loos started shaving years off her age when she was 18 - she claimed to be 16 etc....She played that little girl card for years. Carey is to be believed before another source. God knows where they got their data. EraserGirl (talk) 01:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

 * God knows. Obviously a good biography is to be favoured over someone who affords her a column and a half. Perhaps stick a cite to Carey in there somewhere lest the matter come up again. Adieu. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 03:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

John Emerson husband
Is John Emerson (filmmaker) her husband? I'm not sure but it seems so considering all the films he's presumably affiliated with (as per a Wikipedia search anyway)... ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ 23:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

EraserGirl comments
Yes, John Emerson was her husband, regardless of her reputed affairs, most notably with H.L. Mencken. This article has far too few citations, and not much personal data. I will research it further using NON-internet sources and come back to it in a few days. A good biography is not merely catalog of works produced and husbands. EraserGirl (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I take back what I said after rewriting the article, Emerson wasn't much of a husband, and the affairs were all his. Unfortunately most of the film work he is credited with are not. EraserGirl (talk) 21:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

revision
I apologize for the new length, I went back and reread the Gary biography, as well as other print sources I had around, and when I finished writing my new version, it was about three times as long as it is now. I tried to cut out unnecessary bits, and the result may read a little clunky. If you think I went overboard, feel free to let me know. i will probably revisit it in a few days and try to correct any bad grammar. EraserGirl (talk) 21:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

"Gentlemen Prefer Blondes" tour
There is a line in the "Return to New York" section which I find a little odd: "The show toured for 90 weeks and went on tour for another year." Did the show:-
 * simply tour for 2 years and 38 weeks in total?
 * tour for 90 weeks in one area and a further year elsewhere?
 * play/run for 90 weeks in one theatre and then go on tour for a year?

--Red Su ns et    19:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Thanks for catching my mistake, I must have been on drugs when I typed that. I checked my reference it PLAYED for 90 weeks.  I will correct it.  I now have my own copies of the bio an her books so I can correct the method of reference citation.  The libraries always want their books back, its damned inconvenient. Odd I never could edit my own work. EraserGirl (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

GA status?
Based on admittedly cursory run-through of the article, about the only thing I can think of missing would be more frequent citations, preferably at least one per paragraphy. Otherwise, there might or might not be other complaints as well, but I think those would vary from reviewer to reviewer. John Carter (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I am still casting around for more citable sources beyond the Cary book, all I have left on my desk are her own memoirs, and she was not known for her veracity later in life. EraserGirl (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

 * I was advised, having written a long article using the cite device,  that page numbers were required for specific book references. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Well this is how I was taught to do it, by my editors. I am trying to replace most of the Carey references with others. and I still don't take advice from anonymous users. From what I can tell you have been on WP all of 1 week. EraserGirl (talk) 12:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Oh my. I didn't give you advice, I just recounted a frustrating experience of mine. And to John Carter, technically. Anita Loos is still an excellent article. I was myself following a guide laid out by experienced users, one that did not spell out that using in this way may not satisfy the most rigorous review. Of course by the time someone suggested otherwise, books had been returned to libraries, chapters of others required re-reading in their entirety etc., etc. My IP changes periodically, btw. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 16:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually I own all the books in most of my articles. And if your IP changes you should create an account. I am not looking at moving Loos or any of my others to GA status, they aren't finished in my eyes. EraserGirl (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

 * if your IP changes you should create an account Suggestions like these are best made on User Talk pages, in my humble, non-registered opinion. Again, great article. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 16:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Style of writing
I tagged the whole article with a cleanup template because of a fast and loose (pun intended) style of writing. Phrases like these make me think the article was written like a story: ...and more. Such writing style works great in the bestseller section but fails to meet the expectations of an encyclopedic and straightforward relation of facts, dates and general themes. I have too much on my plate right now to gather all the sources together, study the subject in depth and rewrite the article myself which is why I'm just leaving a tag. Binksternet (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "suffered from wanderlust"
 * "veiled version"
 * "tagged after her alcoholic scamp father as they explored San Francisco's underbelly"
 * "free herself of the shackles"
 * "take a perfunctory bow"
 * "her adoration of Emerson had manifested as subservience"
 * "they did what women do, they went shopping"

 * I would be so much happier with this article if contributors let Loos speak her own funny lines by employing quotes. Phrases such as "toothless flirt" added by User:EraserGirl don't help the article achieve the encyclopedic mission of being informative and accurate. Binksternet (talk) 23:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

 * Still no takers? I've got none of the required books to even consider going through and correcting the personally-invested style of writing. Somebody out there must be able to do this. Binksternet (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Moved to San Fran in 1892?
All the sources and articles I could find indicate Anita's family moved to San Francisco in 1892. My article on R. Beers Loos references a primary source I posted to Wikimedia commons. It is a letter written by Loos, dated 5 December 1892, and on the dateline is written "Sisson" and the bottom is signed "Sisson Mascot." So, either the family moved after 5 Dec or there is a discrepancy? --JasonCochran (talk) 02:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Screenplay credits
I created Category:Screenplays by Anita Loos and went through all the links I could find on this page, but I wasn't quite sure if I should place the uncredited works in that category. If her name wasn't listed in the film's infobox, I didn't put it, but I'm wondering if I should go back and add those films as well. Thoughts? Aristophanes 68  (talk)  04:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Typically, categories at the bottom of an article should be supported by something in the article. If you add the category to uncredited works, please add a bit of sourced text that says Loos wrote it. Binksternet (talk) 04:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

First Husband
I looked up Anita Loos after reading an article about her in a Reader's Digest called "Gentlemen Still Prefer Blondes." It was from 1953. The article claims she left her first husband in 36 hours. In the Wikipedia article is says six months. Seems like a big difference. Which is more accurate? --Fonkety ponk (talk) 16:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Inconsistent timelines
There is a rather large inconsistency with the summer of 1919 for Anita Loos. She is asked by the Talmadges to spend it in Paris without Emerson but then gets married and goes off with her assistant meeting Gertrude Stein and Alice B. ? Also she is in Florida (not having full blown affair) with Mezner and she never sees him again for him to pop up in Hollywood as companion along with Cecil? Then there's the MGM contract that she can't buy her way out of that then just lets her go early? Jennablurrs7575 (talk) 06:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Fixed the Florida situation with wording, but will leave the 1919 summer ( it has sat this way unnoticed for some time, it wont hurt?) until I can find either research or somebody to discuss this here with, please? Jennablurrs 7575  20:59, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

New portrait uploaded

FYI note to editors: I just uploaded a new portrait for Anita Loos. See link. Possibly the same sitting as the portrait you're already using. KKelvinThompson (talk) 00:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Lowlifes and fast women
Not exactly an objective turn of phrase. Nicmart (talk) 10:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Anita Loos