text:
A Captive in the Land

A Captive in the Land (Пленник земли) is a 1990 Soviet–American survival drama film directed by John Berry and written by Berry and Lee Gold. The film is based on the 1962 novel of the same name by James Aldridge and stars Sam Waterston, Aleksandr Potapov and Keir Giles.

Plot
On an Arctic flight, the crew of a RAF transport aircraft overflies a crashed aircraft. Although a survivor is spotted, the crew realizes that a rescue is not possible and rules out a landing. Rupert Royce (Sam Waterston), a U.S. meteorologist aboard the flight, volunteers to parachute to the ice with first aid supplies to treat the survivor.

Bringing supplies with him, Royce lands near the wreckage and finds Averyanov (Aleksandr Potapov), a Soviet navigator, the sole survivor who is injured and unable to be moved. Intending to wait until further help arrives, Royce makes repairs on the shattered aircraft, but soon realizes help is not coming, as the aircraft is far off course. The ice shifts below the wreckage, further complicating their survival.

When a blizzard strands the two men and forces them to survive on their own, they have to accept that different cultural backgrounds cannot jeopardize their survival. As supplies run low and a leaking heater nearly kills them, releasing deadly carbon monoxide into their small enclosure, Royce begins to make plans for both of them to find a way to reach civilization, the nearest settlement, 200 miles away. The isolation, ever-present wolves and dwindling supplies leaves Royce little option.

Setting out into the wilderness with an improvised sled to carry the injured airman, Averyanov urges Royce to save himself, and not to risk his own life in a vain attempt to save someone who will likely die soon anyway. Royce refuses and strives mightily to save the two "captives" of the wild.

Cast

 * Sam Waterston as Rupert Royce
 * Aleksandr Potapov as Averyanov
 * Keir Giles as Squadron Leader Cook
 * Tony Hall as RAF Plane Crew member
 * Victor Ignatyev as Chukchee
 * Aleksei Ivashchenko as RAF Plane Crew member
 * Albert Kondratyev as Chukchee
 * Sofron Yefimov as Chukchee
 * A. Lielise as RAF Plane Crew member
 * Lyutsiya Dzhangaliyeva as Chukchee
 * V. Muratov as RAF Plane Loadmaster
 * L. Tregub as RAF Plane Crew member

Production
A Captive in the Land was filmed in an island in the Onega Bay of the White Sea: Kiy Island and the Lena Rover, involved two sessions of location shooting. Sam Waterston had to return to Russia to complete the film after Aleksandr Potapov suffered a heart attack, causing a suspension of filming.

Reception
A Captive in the Land was screened in the Un Certain Regard section at the 1991 Cannes Film Festival. Stephen Holden in his review for The New York Times, noted: "Had it stuck to the stark physical realities of the situation, "A Captive in the Land," which opens today at the Angelika Film Center, could have been a gripping film. But the movie, which was completed before the crumbling of the Soviet Union, insists on lending the relationship between the American and the Russian a turgid metaphoric significance."

A later review in TV Guide has similar assessments: "The plot and theme of A CAPTIVE IN THE LAND dates back, of course, to Jack London, long a favorite author among Russians, and the entire film project is colored by the reconciliation of American and Russian. Whether as a joint production with Maxim Gorky Film Studios or as an expression of rival ideologies (in a brief argument between the characters that seem outdated and silly) 'A Captive in the Land' is oddly unexciting. Potapov's chatty and literate Russian does not mesh at all well with Waterston's laconic would-be hero, and the location scenes look like stock footage."

title: A Captive in the Land


text:
Cumberland County Schools

Cumberland County Schools (CCS) is a school district encompassing the entirety of Cumberland County, North Carolina, United States.

Cumberland County Schools' headquarters are located in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Cumberland County Schools has schools located in all cities and towns of Cumberland County. Cumberland County Schools is the 4th largest school system in the state and 78 in the country. The district serves most areas for grades PK-12. The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) operates public schools on Fort Liberty for PK-8, but for high school Fort Liberty students attend local public schools in their respective counties.

Student enrollment
Cumberland County Schools has a total of 53,000 enrolled students, including 1000 preschool students, 24,000 elementary students, 12,000 middle school students, and 16,000 high school students. The district employs 3,500 teachers and a total of 6,800 employees.

About half of the students in the district are Black, with about 40% White, and all other races making up less than 10% of enrollment.

Cumberland County Schools is broken into 10 attendance areas, although as a "school of choice", school system, students may attend any school in a district that offers the program, so long as they have transportation to and from school and are approved through an application process. Students from Hope Mills may attend Grays Creek High School, even if they live in the South View High School District, so long as they provide their own transportation.

High Schools

 * A.B. Wilkins High School, Fayetteville
 * Cape Fear High School, Vander
 * Cross Creek Early College High School, Fayetteville
 * Cumberland International Early College High School, Fayetteville
 * Cumberland Polytechnic High School, Fayetteville
 * Douglas Byrd High School, Fayetteville
 * E. E. Smith High School, Fayetteville
 * Gray's Creek High School, Hope Mills
 * Jack Britt High School, Fayetteville
 * Massey Hill Classical High School, Fayetteville
 * Pine Forest High School, Fayetteville
 * Ramsey Street High School, Fayetteville
 * Reid Ross Classical Middle/High School, Fayetteville
 * Seventy-First High School, Fayetteville
 * South View High School, Hope Mills
 * Terry Sanford High School, Fayetteville
 * Westover High School, Fayetteville

Middle Schools

 * Anne Chestnutt Middle School, Fayetteville
 * Douglas Byrd Middle School, Fayetteville
 * Gray's Creek Middle School, Hope Mills
 * Hope Mills Middle School, Hope Mills
 * Howard Learning Academy, Fayetteville
 * John R. Griffin Middle School, Fayetteville
 * Lewis Chapel Middle School, Fayetteville
 * Luther Jeralds Middle School, Fayetteville
 * Mac Williams Middle School, Fayetteville
 * Max Abbott Middle School, Fayetteville
 * New Century International Middle School, Fayetteville
 * Pine Forest Middle School, Fayetteville
 * Reid Ross Classical Middle/High School, Fayetteville
 * Seventy-First Classical Middle School, Fayetteville
 * South View Middle School, Hope Mills
 * Spring Lake Middle School, Spring Lake
 * Westover Middle School, Fayetteville

Elementary Schools

 * Alderman Road Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Armstrong Elementary School, Eastover
 * Ashley Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Beaver Dam Elementary School, Roseboro
 * Ben Martin Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Bill Hefner Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Brentwood Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * C. Wayne Collier Elementary School, Hope Mills
 * Cliffdale Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * College Lakes Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Cumberland Mills Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Cumberland Road Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * District 7 Elementary School, Wade
 * E.E. Miller Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * E. Melvin Honeycutt Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Ed V. Baldwin Elementary School, Hope Mills
 * Eastover-Central Elementary School, Eastover
 * Elizabeth Cashwell Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Ferguson-Easley Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Gallberry Farm Elementary School, Hope Mills
 * Glendale Acres Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Gray's Creek Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Howard Hall Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * J.W. Coon Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * J.W. Seabrook Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Lake Rim Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Long Hill Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Loyd Auman Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Lucile Souders Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Manchester Elementary School, Spring Lake
 * Margaret Willis Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Mary McArthur Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Montclair Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Morganton Road Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * New Century International Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Ponderosa Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Raleigh Road Elementary School, Linden
 * Rockfish Elementary School, Hope Mills
 * Sherwood Park Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Stedman Elementary School, Stedman
 * Stoney Point Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Sunnyside Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Vanstory Hills Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * William H. Owen Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * W.T. Brown Elementary School, Spring Lake
 * Walker-Spivey Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Warrenwood Elementary School, Fayetteville
 * Westarea Elementary School, Fayetteville

Primary Schools

 * Alma Easom Primary School, Fayetteville
 * Stedman Primary School, Stedman

Alternative Schools

 * Cumberland Virtual Academy

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Cumberland County Schools


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IRRP

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE and inform the unsigned users of the procedure of the AfD process. Only speedy deletes get deleted on the same day as they are listed. — J I P | Talk 16:40, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

IRRP
I asked for reliable references/citations on Talk:IRRP but none were forthcoming; not known if this group even exists Demiurge 18:13, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nomination. Demiurge 18:13, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This page was originally at IWRA; the main author of the IWRA page moved it to IRRP with the comment "IWRA moved to IRRP: IWRA does not exist" . So I'm extremely dubious about the veracity of this article. Demiurge 18:39, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Somebody is supposedly proposing a template on the Discussion page for "deletion". I only just wrote it. Really. Somebody is obviously just following me around, to erase my stuff. On the Discussion page?! The editors ("censors") are really getting out-of-hand. (comment by 129.24.95.222)
 * Comment: article was created 8/14/05. -- Kjkolb 08:13, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as it seems to meet the WP is not a crystal ball criteria. Come back (or edit the article before it's deleted) when there's more than an unknown number of members, when the information which 'will be forthcoming in time... is forthcoming, and when the The Reformation Acts which are as yet not ready for general public release are actually encyclopædic. (all italics quoted from the article) Tonywalton | Talk 00:04, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete
 * Fine, delete it. When I am authorized to contribute more information I will re-write it. Apologies for any inconvenience, - User:Wolfsangel, and User:General Heydrich

 * Comment: Are you guys going to delete this page or what? What's the holdup? i made several mistakes, I realise I rushed the article, and I wasn't forthcoming about my sources, so can WE JUST DELETE IT, and I can write it again at some other point?

 * Delete. "It is extremely small, with an unknown number of members." That seems to be a sufficient reason, barring any other signs of notability. -Willmcw 22:28, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IRRP


text:
User talk:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters/Archive08

Long sentences
Thanks for your friendly nudge about shorter sentences (in the Adorno article), and for creating them. My "default" sentence is always a long, rather Germanic one, and I have to remind myself, or be reminded by others, to aim at shorter ones. Jeremy J. Shapiro 19:32, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I've written some pretty daunting sentences in my time. But I feel like a principle of respect for others mandates that I reserve them for people who have explicitly declared their interest in participating in sado-masochistic role-play, i.e. subscribers to professional philosophy journals. :-). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 20:15, 2005 September 9 (UTC)

Thanks to the anti-vandals
Thanks muchly to Kirill Lokshin and Antandrus for reverting the random squiggles that some anon vandal put here on the talk page, and on my user page. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 03:36, 2005 September 10 (UTC)

Re: GIF patents
Hello,

apparently the Unisys patent has expired, but IBM still holds a patent on the LZW part of GIF. -- JeLuF 10:40, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

 * Really! LZW as an algorithm is quite a bit older than is GIF as a format. It's hard to see how it could either not be prior art, or how it could still be in effect.  But anyway, IBM hasn't been evil, as Unisys was.  And anything could be patented, since there's no real way of knowing (nor any limit on the triviality, obviousness, or antiquity of "inventions" for which patents are granted). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 17:02, 2005 September 10 (UTC)

If it's not one thing, it's another
No? :-) (above is by User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters)

 * Mathematically it's certainly the case that "Discordianism was founded in either 23 BCE, 1958, or 1959" or that "Wikipedia is either an online encyclopedia or a dessert topping". But the implication, in English, is that all such options are equally likely, or at least that all of them have unknown truth values. DenisMoskowitz 20:53, 2005 September 11 (UTC)

What do you use categories for?
Lulu, after reading your user page, I'm wondering what you use categories for? I find that I just use them to find articles that are similar to ones I find interesting, a mechanism to surf. Considering the technology, and the users of Wikipedia, I suspect that an accurate, comprehensive organization of categories is impossible. Perhaps because of the way I use them, I don't want people deleting categories that seem interesting or useful. I'd rather try and find some middle path that lets the categories exist, yet satisfies the desires for those that see categories as a way to structure knowledge. Yes, put the information in the articles. -- Samuel Wantman 06:56, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

 * My ideas about this are evolving. Honestly, the first time I gave much thought to categories at all was when I stumbled across two inappropriate ones used in the Wittgenstein article (the secular jewish and lgbt philosopher categories).  The first was successfully CfD'd altogether, the latter was removed from the particular article (with consensus on the talk page).

 * But as much as I've formulated it in my mind, I think I mostly prefer the "browsing" to be via links in articles themselves. "See also" sections are great, and I would love to see more of them, and to see them more populated (I've done some edits along those lines).  A "See also" has a lower burden to qualify, IMO.  For one thing, you can explain in the text why a reader might want to see that other thing.  But for another, it's not only things that are "alike" that you might want to see.  You might "see also" something opposed to or contrasted with the thing in the article itself.  Overall, that's more parsimonious to my thinking.

 * That said, some categories are OK. You can see that I've created some, in fact.  Well, the Category:Philosophy of sexuality is partially as a counterpostion to the Category:LGBT philosophers that I don't like.  You know why: the former is about what the actually do/did, the latter easily descends to gossip.  And I made some slightly silly categories in the "Wikipedians" space, but I think that's harmless (and since it's a matter of self-identification, I would mildly oppose a CfD on them).  And I like the mild irony of categorizing myself a bunch of ways right after I rant against categories (but not really against them, just for parsimony).

 * Even the philosophy of sexuality category, however, might really be better off in the article Philosophy of sex. It might be nice if there was a way to automatically insert a category into an article (not as a categorization of article itself, but as an merged "See also" or the like).  Maybe I'll work on that; the article as it stands is quite stubby, though it basically just mentions my real-life friend/colleague Alan Soble, which is kinda a nice accidental connection. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 07:17, 2005 September 12 (UTC)

Rfc on Monicasdude?
Hi....

Is there any news on the progress of this situation?...... I've been to the page and seen many testimonials, but no decisive action. Will there be a resolution?

Thanks BGC 13:19, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I dunno, but it doesn't really seem like it so far. As you say, there is lots of testimony, but no indication that Monicasdude recognizes any underlying issue.  His response has just been evasive and tangential.  Actually, mostly just self-rightous.  Any ideas on how to move it forward in a more helpful way? Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 16:54, 2005 September 12 (UTC)

Hey Lulu,...
Have you ever eaten this?!!!:) Voice of All  @ ''' 02:59, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Why, does it seem like my lotus-eating is all bluster? :-)

 * If you mean it as a reference to "Magic, the gathering", I've only just heard of that game, so the username isn't a reference to that. Actually, I've used the same username way before WP existed; probably starting about 1993 (check google groups for probably the oldest usage). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 03:22, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Monicasdude about to break 3RR
Hey... I added song timings, a better-looking infobox (let alone filled the missing info) and songcredits to Dylan's Live at The Gaslight 1962 - removing, in the process, biased, self-promoting external links to Monicasdude's own webpages. And he's reverted the page WHOLE back to his own verison - TWICE (of course, because it's HIS page, is it not?). I don't know who to make aware, but he's set to break the 3RR. I've only reverted twice and have stopped there. This is why I'm contacting you since you're WELL aware of his habits and perhaps you could alert an admin who is familiar with this user's lack of co-operation and hopefully impose a block. I will contact JDG as well.

Thanks... BGC 18:45, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I added the page to my watchlist. I'll restore your version if Monicasdude reverts it again. If Monicasdude violates 3RR, you should file a report on it, with a brief description of the background (a sentence or two, not the whole RfC discussion). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 18:53, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Got your message - will keep a watch. I reckon his attempt to get me blocked didn't work. BGC 20:38, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Jews in music
Hi Lulu I know you're not picking on me :(( The reason I chose Jews in music as the category name was that I wanted to create a broad short category that would cover a lot of people. Why don't we just change it to a parent category with sub categories such as Jewish classical musicians, Jewish conductors, Jewish song writers, Jews in pop and rock, Jews in jazz etc. and maybe when something like this http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_flatten is implemented it will kind of have the same effect I intended (an easily scannable list) Arnie587 14:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Hi Lulu I'm not really against taking the "in" out of most of the titles but I still think the parent category needs to be one of these "Jews in music", "Jews in the field of music", "Jews in the music field", "Jews in the world of music" or something similar as the current proposed rename does not properly cover singers or impresarios so please can you change the title of the rename to one of those then I will create the sub categories and move the entries in this category using User:Pearle Arnie587 19:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I really don't like "in", it just sounds wrong. And I don't at all like "Jews" rather than "Jewish" either, it sounds even more wrong, and completely breaks the pattern of categories.  Ethnic/national terms get adjectives not nouns: African-American Foos, Swedish Foos, etc.  I'm not sure if there are categories for religious membership, but if there are, they will be Buddhist Foos, Hindu Foos, etc.
 * I'm not sure how you can say Jews as a category sounds wrong as this is the parent category of all things related to the Jewish people (it is not Jewish people which would fit your method). Therefore I cannot see how Jews in the world of music does fit in with the parent category of Jews. Category:Jews Arnie587 21:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd go for Category:Jewish musicians, with a description in the category page that said "musicians includes these other music-related occupations". You could subcat as you liked from there, whether by genre or more specific occupation, e.g. Category:Jewish jazz pianists to be really specific. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 20:19, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * why make a poor compromise? I don't think that Jewish musicians is accurate enough, whereas I think Jews in the world of music is (I concede that Jewish scientists and Jewish visual artists are acceptable alternatives). Arnie587 21:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Hi Lulu, this is the category heirarchy for music in France:

Category:France > Category:French_culture > Category:French_music > Category:French_musicians > Category:French_classical_musicians Category:French composers Category:French singers etc.

so can we implement a similar thing starting with renaming the category to Category:Jewish classical_musicians as a sub category of Category:Jewish_musicians or Category:Jewish_music (I will remove anyone who doesn't fit the new title) (I have re-named the change category to Category:Jewish classical musicians as this generally fits the people who I currently have input into it) sorry this is so drawn out but hopefully now we can get it organized correctly ? Arnie587 22:16, 22 September 2005 (UTC) Arnie587 21:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Jews in space
4 medieval jewish astronomers!!!:
 * Jehuda Cresques
 * Abraham ibn Ezra
 * Gersonides
 * Maimonides

WOOHOOOOOOO Arnie587 15:27, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Cfr mid vote
Hi.. I've put a note on all the talk pages of the voters, do you think Category:Jewish musicians is the right parent category for Category:Jewish classical musicians as I have a feeling what is in the category currently is mostly Hebrew music related. Maybe I should create a sub category Category:Jews in western music in Category:Jewish music I know you really are against using "Jews in" but I'm not sure there is a better way of differentiating to Hebrew/Synagogue music as Category:Jewish western musicians doesn't really work Arnie587 16:31, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Yes, I am really against the tin-eared form "Jews in Foo".

 * Part of the problem is it doesn't connote what you want. "Jews in science" would normally mean something like "How does eugenics discuss the Jewish race"? And "Jews in music" would normally mean something like "Song lyrics with Jewish characters."  Of course, the fact it just plain sounds bad doesn't help (they all sound like Brooks' joke about "Jews in Space"). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 16:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

 * so what category do you think Category:Jewish classical musicians should be in? Category:Jews, Category:Jewish musicians Category:Jewish music, Category:Jewish culture or something else Arnie587 19:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Well, a classical musician is a musician, right? That's equally true of a Swedish classical musician or Indian classical musician (though the latter insinuates a different sort of classical music). I think of "Jewish music" as more about the musical forms (e.g. Klezmer); if Yehudi Menuhin plays Bach's "St. Matthew Passion", that's not exactly Jewish music :-).  Probably the same for the broader culture... though I guess some argument could be made that any Jewish artist who does whatever contributes in some sense to "Jewish culture" (it's more tenuous though). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 20:03, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

 * so maybe it's best I hide it in the Category:Jewish musicians category (Category:Jewish musicians is a sub category of Category:Jewish music which is a sub of Category:Jewish culture. Arnie587 21:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Category dispute

 * Re: I took out Lenin on exactly the same grounds (Lenin is absurd to include; though I myself added Stalin). But I also added in many of those you took out, where the case seemed at least plausible (certainly not undisputed in any case; that's the whole problem with the cat). The original cat creators clearly have an anti-Communist schtick to push, so adding some pro-American dictators like Somoza and Papa Doc sort of fleshed out what the category would amount to if retained. It's hard not to think of them as totalitarian dictators.

There is no page where the addition of this category fails to be anything but POV and "original research." It is up for political scientists to flesh out where the case seems plausible, focusing on ambigious cases that you noted such as Lenin. Political scientists always disgree on what totalitarianism is, when and where to apply it, and even whether or not it is a useful concept for researchers. Thus, making any of these decisions one way or another is POV... Further, adding the leaders whom you call "pro-American dictators" such as Somoza and Papa Doc only makes things much worse. In the case of Lenin, it's at least plausible to many specialists that his regime was totalitarian. But no serious scholar ever classifies the Somoza and Duvalier regimes as totalitarian. These regimes will be described as a "personalism," "sultanism," "kleptocracy," or simply "authoritarian." Their regimes were way too under-institutionalized to exert the kinds of regular reach into the privite sphere as Stalin's Russia or even Lenin's Russia. 172 | Talk 19:24, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I don't disagree with you on inherently POV. Just see how vehement I am on the CfD page, for example.  But what if the CfD fails, then what?
 * Remove all the categories from the individual pages on grounds that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, meaning that category schemes based on original research POV must be removed. 172 | Talk 19:49, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

 * FWIW, I cannot at all agree with your "plausible" claims above: Only the John Birchers and the like would ever call Lenin totalitarian, and even then it's only under the counter-factual speculation that "had Lenin lived longer, he would have done what Stalin did."  You might have a point on the under-institutionalization of Haiti, but that's surely not true of Nicaragua (nor even more so Chile and Pinochet).  Of course, there is that awful Jean Kirkpatrick thing that "the guys we like are authoritarian, and the ones we don't like are totalitarian"... but surely she doesn't count as a "serious scholar!"
 * I don't think that Pinochet's Chile is ever classified as "totalitarian" either. It's not just Kirkpatrick saying that it was "authoritarian" and not "totalitarian." It's also scholars like Juan Linz fleshing this out as a clear distinction. At the same time, I'm aware of some comparativists who argue that Lenin was laying the groundwork for a totalitarian regime working in the tradition of Ardent's work. At any rate, these problems should just go to show the creators of this category how probelmatic it was in the first place. 172 | Talk 19:49, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I recently successfully CfD'd "Political corrrectness" which was the same nonsense "comment by cat". However, in that case, the category autonomously depopulated itself.  Longtime editors of each of the 20+ pages contentiously added removed the cat because it was nonsense for that specific article.  But in each case (AFAICT, I didn't rigorously look through all the histories), it was existing page editors who did it, not someone new to the page who disliked the cat.  That seemed much more proper to me. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 19:38, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Good work. I hate these damn nonsense categories that keep popping up. 172 | Talk 19:49, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Jeff Merkey (repeating) comments
Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Request for WP:RFM opened on lulu. (unsigned comment by Jeff Merkey)

 * Btw. Context for other editors wandering by. I started a cleanup of the page Jeffrey Vernon Merkey.  Jeff Merkey himself (editing as an anon) is not happy to have a neutral point of view introduced into an article about himself.  I have no idea if there's really an RfM connected with this, but we'll see.  Merkey is sort of a SOLLOG type character, who threatens to sue anyone who says anything about him.  Which is actually irrelevant to the article on him, which should simply be WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, and WP:V; but just for reader context. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 07:18, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * There is an actual entry on WP:RFM, but it's a bogus one: only one party is named, no consent has been obtained, no other avenues have been tried, and the description is untruthful.Exabit 10:56, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

"Sollog type character" is a personal attack of Merkey. 67.177.35.211 08:38, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Sollog probably has a contrary opinion... Exabit 03:44, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for taking on the JVM article. You certainly have more editing-fu than I have, and I admire your patience and persiverance in dealing with JVM's disruptions of the work the article is in dire need of. As for the anonymous editing; it feels as if Jeff is very much acting impulsively and thus forgetting to log in half the time. --MJ 15:03, 27 September 2005 (UTC).

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (repeated, unsigned comment by Jeff Merkey)

 * This is called 'editing', Jeff. Also, please stop making changes to your own article. --MJ 18:41, 27 September 2005 (UTC).

I am not merkey, I am his attorney, and I will edit all I please. (unsigned, pro se comment by Jeff Merkey, 67.137.28.187)

 * Interestingly, on Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey, we find this comment (Re: "I believe that the only source of the military awards so far is Mr. Merkey himself"):

 * I will scan and post my DD214 and Orders granting the awards from the Secretary of the Army. 67.137.28.187 23:22, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Watch your pronouns, "Merkey's attorney". Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 06:46, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Also, the contributions log for the IP lists many comments first signed with the IP address, then subsequently edited to correct the signature to 'Gadugi'. --MJ 08:48, 28 September 2005 (UTC).

Shapiro Frankfurt School chart
Thanks for the note. I did figure it out on my own, as you said. When I'd posted the question I wasn't aware that Jeremy Shapiro had returned for Wikipedia. He stopped editing in 2003, I believe, after he had written his brilliant overview of critical theory. Seconds later I found that you were conversing with him all along, so I went ahead and erased my question... For all Wikipedia's problems, it's quite a credit to it to have people like you and Shapiro contributing to its articles. 172 | Talk 20:47, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

You're quite welcome... Sure, I'll take a look at your article... I also agree that there should be an article on Jeremy Shapiro. If you start one, I'll look into what I can add to it... BTW, I saw that Barrington Moore came up in your conversation. There is an article on him, but only a stub. Hopefully that article will get expanded too in the recent future. 172 | Talk 21:22, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

 * I didn't mention Barrington Moore, Jr.. Maybe elsewhere in a thread I was in.  But yeah, that could use some cleanup.  I don't really know Moore to work on it though (just the name, and about as much as the WP article says); I could look around for more info, of course. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:27, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

 * Odd little connection though: I was amused and surprised to learn that I am cited in a book on Russian foreign policy.  Nothing close to my area of expertise, but it's nice to be mentioned :-). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters

Sockpuppets
Lulu:

Unfortunatly, it requires a developer to check IP's; we admins aren't trusted with the power. ;-) I have a personal policy of not getting involved in these kinds of conflicts, as they almost always turn ugly. (Most of my blocks on the blocklist were username blocks from the new user log.) I'd suggest bringing it up on AN/I, where other admins can review it and intervene if appropriate. I'll mention it in the IRC channel and see if anyone there wants to take a stab at it. -- Essjay ·  Talk 06:44, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

 * OK. I have no idea about how that admin stuff works.  I was just guessing from the blocklist.  I'll give it a day or something.  Maybe Fvw who has acted on this before will do whatever needs doing (dunno what timezone s/he's in, but I'm sure s/he'll notice).  Or obviously if some IRC admin wants to do stuff. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 06:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Fvw is in the CET timezone (+1 hour) and has noticed Merkeys antics, judging by the reverts of CowboyLawyer/Merkey's edits to Linus Torvalds. --MJ( ☎ 18:05, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

AfD List of born-again Christian laypeople
I will be placing the article in AfD in a coupe of days (I want to see what response my comment generates). If the Afd does not get consensus, so be it. But we ought to try. ≈ jossi ≈ 21:43, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Category:Totalitarian dictators
After contibuting to Wikipedia for nearly 3 years, I can predict how letting this category survive by virtue of a technicality might open up a huge can of worms. First, there's little doubt that some will assert that the fact that no consensus was established on CfD means that they can repopulate the category everywhere it has been added. Second, there's a tendency for "inclusionists" on Wikipedia to vote to keep any category or article that has survived a process once. So there's no reason to expect a second CfD to go any better... But I think if we extend the voting (a practice common on VfD, nominations for admin, and FAC), it shouldn't be too difficult at all to make the strong case for deletion and thus establish a clear consensus with the votes. 172 | Talk 23:31, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

 * I obviously agree with your goal of getting rid of the category. But I believe it is more likely to succeed by letting it stand for a hiatus.  Frankly, I think the ideologues who started the category, will get bored and forget about it with a little time; and a new vote would be among more informed and disinterested editors.  But I defer to your decision on the course to pursue.  But if you keep the CfD tag on the category page, I think you need it to link to the CfD discussion properly... the old discussion will get shunted off to archives pretty soon, won't it? Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 23:37, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the understanding... I believe that it is linked properly, since I reinserted the 9/23 thread in CfD, but I'll take another look. 172 | Talk 23:42, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this edit took care of the problem without having to create a new log. 172 | Talk 23:44, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

 * I dunno, it looks wrong to me. I'm not an admin, so maybe I misunderstand procedures.  But it would make more sense to me to copy the whole discussion up to Oct 1, and remove the notice that it was closed from the copy.  I think new voters will be confused by the way it is arranged now. (none of this comment concerns the merit or wisdom of the specific re-opening; just its administravia). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 23:50, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks, Lulu, for the revert of the lovely link suggestions from that retaliating vandal. Now, for me to actually put something of substance there.. ;) --MJ( ☎ 22:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC).

I want to have your babies!
"Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food from the bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the uneducated; technology from the underdeveloped; and putting advocates of freedom in prisons. Intellectual property is to the 21st century what the slave trade was to the 16th" - Thanks, this is perfect.

If it wasn't for Jeff, I would never have found your page. It's an ill wind... Vryl 17:35, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

 * I don't have any interest in paternity, nor in maternity for that matter :-). However, I would love to have you propogate my slogan wherever you think it might want to travel (it's one of my email sig's, and some folks have cited it various places). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 18:36, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Heteronormativity
Hi. Your edit comment, "C'mon look up a word in a dictionary before adding random cats," makes it hard for me to tell why it is that you removed Category:Sociolinguistics from Heteronormativity. To quote the very first line from Sociolinguistics:
 * Sociolinguistics is the study of the effect of any and all aspects of society, including cultural norms, expectations, and context, on the way language is used.

This certainly jibes with my understanding of both sociolinguistics and heteronormativity, so my question to you is: in what way did you feel that Category:Sociolinguistics was inappropriate? -Harmil 20:24, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * You did copy the definition of sociolinguistics here. I'm baffled by what connection you see to the concept "heteronormativity" in there.  I can sort of make wild guesses about how one might draw an indirect connection, but it's not at all obvious.  Like maybe since sociolinguistics is somewhat related to "discourse analysis", and understanding heteronormativity is in some (minor) aspect concerned with discourse analysis, there is a tiny thread of a relationship.  This gets kind of like the "six degrees of Kevin Bacon" game though.  I suppose we might equally well add Category:American actors because Pinkett-Smith is mentioned in passing in the Heteronormativity article.

 * But there's really a burden of proof matter here. If you actually think there is a connection that warrants categorization, explain it on the talk page, and see if you can get anyone else to understand it.  Unlike the dreadful, and happily deleted, political correctness category, there's nothing pejorative about sociolinguistics.  In fact, I positively love Labov's work.  It's just that there's no category relationship here.  Still, if you can get another editor or two to believe you that there's a category, I'll withdraw my... well, it's not really an "objection" so much as "utter bafflement". Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 20:32, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * First off, I'm assuming that you are acting in good faith, here, and I hope that you are making the same assumption, and further that you realize that while I've defended critiques of the heteronormativity article in the past, I've done so because I believe it to be fundamentally correct, and thus worth the effort. OK, enough of that, on to your points.

 * Heteronormativity relates to the gender-roles that our culture imposes tacitly, and without explicit structure (e.g. laws) to enforce them (though heteronormative laws certainly exist). The most commonly cited example of this, and the one that is cited on heteronormativity in fact, is language. In the particular instance that that article cites, it's not that J.P.-S. should have consciously thought to include non-heterosexual lifestyles in her speech. Instead, the problem was that her use of language was a reflection of a set of assumptions which dismiss or maginalize such lifestyles. Time and again, we (those of us who aspouse the idea that heteronormativity is an important phenomenon) point out that "manpower" isn't just an unfortunate word, but the reflection of an unfortunate cultural bias, and specifically a point of view which is normative in most modern societies.

 * Hmmm... on the narrow point you mention, I'm not sure whether "manpower" is a reasonable example. Is it etymologically derived from the Germanic 'Mann' or the Romance "manus" (as in "manual labor").  In the latter case, it would simply mean "labor using hands". Just because someone ignorant of word history might misunderstand words doesn't, to me, motivate a critique of "implicit sexism/racism/homophobia/etc".  Likewise, the word "niggardly" just don't mean anything negative about blacks, despite the superficial phonetic resemblance. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:35, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * As you say, that's a narrow point. Let me address it quickly: you're running in etymological circles. You'll recall that the Old English "man" (or "mann") did not specifically refer to male humans, but to humans in general. It is a common misconception that "man" as in "mankind" is an abuse of the modern word for male human. In fact, it is a homonym, sharing the same origins, and has the same meaning that it had in Old English. That said, I don't have an OED handy here, but I'd be shocked if the claim is that "manpower" derives from anything but the modern, male-centric meaning of "man" (and thus from the same Old English roots). This is why I used it as an example.

 * I did not know that about Old English "man". I was just thinking that since the modern German or Yiddish (Dutch too, right?) took the same gendered course, that was in the original sense.  That's interesting.  I guess I'm falsely influenced by spurious criticisms of "man" as a transitive verb: "man the ship", which really does have the Latin root altogether. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 23:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * To be fair, I would not have remembered most of that without checking a reference. -Harmil 01:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Now, reflecting on the definition of sociolinguistics, I see the influence of cultural norms on language to be the core, defining attribute of any sociolinguistic topic. If you disagree, then I guess we can begin our discussion there, and see where this disconnect originates, but I suspect that's not the case. In fact, I suspect that you were quite correct in your initial reaction, but only with respect to implications that I was not making. I don't think that heteronormativity is a sociolinguistic concept, but that the category is appropriate because heteronormativity includes many sociolinguistic concepts. Does that make it more appropriate for a "see also" than a category? Dunno... maybe. -Harmil 21:18, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * My hunch was kinda right then; you are really thinking more of discourse analysis than sociolinguistics. If J P-S had, e.g. palatalized her vowels because of a "heteronormative assumption", sure fine, that's sociolinguistics.  I don't think anyone is claiming that.  What people do claim is that things like word choice, or general rhetorical forms, are affected by assumptions about normative heterosexuality.  That's interesting and all, but is at best at the far, far reaches of sociolinguistics, in the category just barely, if at all.  While sociolinguistics is useful to know if what you want to do is ideology critique, or discourse analysis, or rhetoric (or even be a good dialogue writer), the core concern of sociolinguistics really is the effect of social context (registers, class, gender, etc) on morphology, syntax, and phonemics.  It's not about "pragmatics" so much, and still less about outright ideology. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:28, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * You seem to be splitting some fairly thin hairs there. Let me leave Wikipedia behind for a moment and refer to Douglas A. Demo of the Center for Applied Linguistics. His words:
 * The study of discourse has developed in a variety of disciplines-sociolinguistics, anthropology, sociology, and social psychology. Thus discourse analysis takes different theoretical perspectives and analytic approaches: speech act theory, interactional sociolinguistics, ethnography of communication, pragmatics, conversation analysis, and variation analysis (Schiffrin, 1994). Although each approach emphasizes different aspects of language use, they all view language as social interaction.
 * So, I would agree that there are, as he put it, "theoretical perspectives" from which I am either far off-base or at the very margin of the definition of sociolinguistics. However, the idea that language (and by language I mean grammar, syntax, and vocabulary in addition to other topics) is one of the primary topics of heteronormativity seems to me to be fundamentally a sociolinguistic subset of discourse analysis.

 * But, do we really need to split hairs over the definitions of sociolinguistics and discourse analysis? More to the point, does Wikipedia even offer us the opportunity to be so precise? Look at the sub-categories and articles of Category:Sociolinguistics and ask yourself: was I mis-categorizing heteronormativity by placing it along-side the topics that I did? Now, I would be the last to try to stop you if you wanted to go re-vamp the entire category and create more specific categories that are more appropriate. Until then, however, and given the above rationale, I ask that you either return the article to the category that I added or select a category that you feel more narrowly and correctly reflects the above reasoning.

 * Thank, you for your consideration and your time. -Harmil 22:21, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * How about Category:Political terms? Not in the sense the "heteronormativity" is itself a political term (though it is in a sense), but in that it discusses the political implications of "ordinary" terms. Looking at what is in Category:Sociolinguistics right now, I still think heteronormativity would be out of place.  Well, FWIW, I think "political correctness" is out of place there too; but trying to take it out would probably be like jumping in a briar bush.  Most of the other terms are pretty much classic Labovian, or at least not too far from the grammar/syntax/phonemics area.  Hmmm... something like a Category:Speech acts might work. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 22:52, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Category:Political terms seems to overlap Category:Political neologisms (after all, is a neologism not just a "new term"?) But, I'll stand back at this point content in the knowledge that the article is clearly in good hands, and I have my hands full with my work on Native Americans and various sorts of mushroom (of which I have about 1000 photographs waiting for identification, cropping, uploading and article writing... sigh  -Harmil 01:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Good luck with your mushrooms :-). I think that you're right that political terms and political neologisms are close in meaning.  But the former is a subcat of sociolinguistics, while the latter is not.  So by adding the former cat, it indirectly implicates sociolinguistics in the way you want, while still choosing a subcat that is a bit more specific.  Though "speech acts", as I suggest might be more useful... if I can think of a good list of other articles that should go in Category:Speech acts, perhaps I'll create that as a subcat of sociolinguistics (well, if I get around to it). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 03:13, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Invitation
Banno 21:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Will do. I should edit more of the philosophy articles since I am, y'know, credentialed in that field (which is fairly rare I think... maybe 200 philos Ph.D.'s a year in the USA?) Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Controversy
I love it! Banno 21:07, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Here we go
Here we go. See you out there, LotLE. JDG 00:02, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Merkey
Hi thanks for the updates, it needs some more work yet but hopefully not too much! --Pgk 17:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

On disillusionment
I agree with you but I have no strong opinion on the matter. I simply left that particular word as it was so that I would not be accused of blindly reverting unrelated changes. I also have no opinion on the picture to be chosen at present. --TJive 07:11, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

 * OK. I have a moderate opinion on the picture, but not enough that I will revert whoever changed it most recently.  Actually, it looks like the saluting picture that I somewhat dis-prefer is going to get yanked on copyvio, so that will become moot (but I won't do anything to hasten or prevent that outcome).  However, the "disillusioned" is wrong enough that I'll keep trying to fix it.  There are lots of words that would be non-wrong, but someone else's "alienated" seems fine to me. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 16:11, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Significance of my name
Hi, Lulu. I don't think there's any special significance in the choice of Ann as opposed to Anne, other than parents' preference. It's probably like Catherine and Katherine – as far as I know, they have no special significance either. I was named after my mother, who was named after Saint Anne, but in literature, St Anne is often referred to as Ann or even Anna. Of course there isn't any evidence that she was called Ann in any form, or that her husband was called Joachim – we just have to use some names to refer to people whom we certainly believe to have existed!

As for the way my ancestors pronounced "Heneghan" – I very much doubt if there were any Heneghans before the middle of the nineteenth century, and it's probably even later. So it's long after the time when the Anglo-Saxons were pronouncing silent letters in "knight". My ancestors were called Éineacháin. Imagine the ch pronounced as in Bach, and then try Aynachawn. The men were called Ó hÉineacháin, the Ó meaning from. The women were called ní Éineacháin, the ní being a contraction of iníon uí (daughter of). The Éin part means bird, and the cháin part means little, in the sense of insignificant or minor, rather than physically small. My grandfather used the name Heneghan, but I'm sure that my great-grandfather, who would have been bilingual, used both names. Go back a little further, and I'm sure that the English form didn't even exist.

If you look at the article on the Irish town Drogheda, you'll see another example of an Irish name with ch being changed to an English name with gh, in which the g is silent. Ann Heneghan (talk) 23:12, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Interesting to know. Thanks for the little name etymology: I figured you'd know it since you have a linguistics degree, and would have been bound to wonder during the course of that (if not long before). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 02:36, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Weathermen
(In reply to Lulu's comment)

Yeah I must admit, looking at his/her edit history, he/she seems to have some issues with you :-( Do you know who he/she is? Akamad 01:45, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

 * That's the funny thing, I have no idea whatsoever who user:Tanya Ravine is, or where she came from. I tried some to ferret this out on talk:David Mertz, but the responses were ambiguous.  But she seem to have been born into the world (well, the WP part of it) with the intent to defame my (extremely minor) noteriety. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 02:39, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Semi-automated template substitution

 * This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Tawker 18:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


text:
Provost (martial arts)

In the 16th-century, London-based Corporation of Masters of the Noble Science of Defence (or "Company of Masters") Provost was the third of four ranks, the others being Scholar, Free Scholar, and Master. A Free Scholar could not be accredited as a Provost until they had studied under a registered Master for seven years (though this time requirement was occasionally shortened). Acquiring the rank of Provost required a gruelling Prize Playing with a variety of swords and other weapons, followed by a formal oath. Provosts were allowed to accept students and open their own fighting schools.

Provost is also used as a rank in Historical European martial arts organisations, such as the Association for Renaissance Martial Arts, which base their ranking systems on that of the London Company of Masters.

title: Provost (martial arts)


text: Category:Humanistic psychology

title: Category:Humanistic psychology


text:
Cylob

Chris Jeffs (born in 1976), best known by the stage name Cylob, is a British electronic musician and producer closely associated with Aphex Twin. He has produced seven albums, three compilations and a number of remixes. Previously signed to Rephlex records, Jeffs started his own digital label Cylob Industries in 2007. His most well-known tracks include "Rewind" and "Cut The Midrange, Drop The Bass".

Career
His career evolved after he gave a demo tape to Aphex Twin at a gig in early 1993, who subsequently signed Jeffs to his Rephlex label a short time after. For a while the two were working and living in the same building.

Since his debut, he has released 13 singles and 5 albums on Rephlex, in addition to the EP Spider Report for Breakin' Records. Then followed the harsh dancefloor sonics of Cylob's Latest Effort and Lobster Tracks (with its Chris Cunningham-illustrated sleeve), pop pastiche with "Living In The 1980s", meditative bells and gongs on Mood Bells and the electronic funk and braindance of Cylob Music System Volumes 1 & 2.

Although Cylob's music is predominantly instrumental, using a drum machine patch with sequencers, that evolved into a digital compositions which included "midi style sequencing".

A video to "Rewind" directed by Mark Adcock and featuring martial artist Chloe Bruce saw a fair amount of MTV airplay on its release in 1999.

In 2007 he launched his own label, Cylob Industries, to release his material, while licensing it to various labels for hard-copy prints on CD and vinyl. In 2014, the compilation Cymply The Best 93-01 was released, while much of the Rephlex material was re-released. Chris has since retired from the music industry citing tinnitus as the reason he can no longer produce music.

Singles and EPs

 * Kinesthesia Volume 1 as Kinesthesia (Rephlex CAT 011 EP : 12/93)
 * Kinesthesia Volume 2 as Kinesthesia (Rephlex CAT 014 EP : 7/95)
 * Industrial Folk Songs (Rephlex CAT 015 EP : 8/95)
 * Empathy Box Remixes as Kinesthesia (Rephlex CAT 022 EP : 1/96)
 * Cylob's Latest Effort (Rephlex CAT 049 EP/CD : 97)
 * Diof 97 (Rephlex CAT 044 EP/CD : 97)
 * Are We Not Men Who Live and Die (Rephlex CYLOB 1 EP/CD : 98)
 * Rewind! (Rephlex CAT 074 EP/CD : 2/99)
 * Lobster Tracks (Rephlex CAT 076 EP/CD : 7/99)
 * Living in the 1980s / Sex Machine (Rephlex CAT 075 EP / CD : 11/99)
 * Cut The Midrange, Drop The Bass (Rephlex CAT 121 EP / CD : 11/2001)
 * Cylobotnia (with Astrobotnia) (Rephlex CAT 144 EP / CD : 10/2003)
 * Cylob Music System Volume 1 (Rephlex CAT 151 EP : 4 / 2004)
 * Cylob Music System Volume 2 (Rephlex CAT 152 EP : 5 / 2004)
 * Spider Report E.P. (Breakin' Records BRK45 : 5 / 2004)
 * Private Life (With DMX Krew as Private Lives) (SoulJazz Records SJR 160 12 : 7/2007)
 * Rock The Trojan Fader (Cylob Industries CSR 001 M : 7 / 2007)
 * Late In The Day (Cylob Industries CSR 005 M : 1 / 2008)
 * Alpine Acid (mp3 only) (Cylob Industries : 16 / 1 / 2008)
 * Pepper Spray (Cylob Industries CSR 006 M : 3 / 2010)
 * Inflatable Hope (Power Vacuum POWVAC012 : 16 / 6 / 2015)
 * Tomorrow Foolish Logic (Cylob Industries : 10/2021)

Albums

 * Empathy Box as Kinesthesia, later re-released as Cylob (Rephlex CAT 022 LP/CD : 4/96)
 * Loops and Breaks (Rephlex CAT 032 LP : 8/96)
 * Cylobian Sunset (Rephlex CAT 033 LP/CD : 8/96)
 * Previously Unavailable on Compact Disc (Rephlex CAT 055 CD : 98)
 * Mood Bells (Rephlex CAT 122 CD : 11/2001)
 * Trojan Fader Style (Cylob Industries CSR 002 M : 7/2007)
 * Formant Potaton (Cylob Industries CSR 003 M : 8/2007)
 * Ambient News as Ambient News (Cylob Industries CSR 007 M : 8/2009)
 * Bounds Green (Cylob Industries CSR 004 M & WeMe 012 : 9/2007)
 * Catastrophic as nonprivate (Alku ALKU 93 : 4/2010)
 * Zweite Sendung as Ambient News (Cylob Industries CSR 009 : 10/2011)
 * The Quantum Loonyverse (mp3/flac only) (Cylob Industries CSR 010 : 1 / 1 / 2015)
 * 54 Minute Mirage (Cylob Industries CSR 012 : 8/2020)
 * One Less Pitch (Cylob Industries CSR 011 : 8/2020)
 * Live 060708 (Cylob Industries CSR 301 : 8/2020)
 * PLACEHOLDER (Cylob Industries CSR 013 : 10/2021)

Remixes

 * Bochum Welt : Scharlach Eingang : Rephlex CAT 030 EP : "Phlughaven Alphard (Kinesthesia Mix)" : 94
 * Aphex Twin : Ventolin : Warp WAP 60 R : "Ventolin (Cylob mix)" : 95
 * Immersion : Remixes Volume 3 : Swim : "Envelope (Cylob remix)" : 95
 * DMX Krew : Nu Romantix : Rephlex CAT 061 LP/CD : "I'm All Alone (Cylob's mix)" : 98
 * The Jones Machine : Rephlex CAT 083 EP/CD : "You're The One (Part Two) - Cylob's mix / (I'm The)" * "Disco Dancing - Cylob's mix" : 99
 * Soulwax : Saturday (Hotline mix) : Play It Again Sam : 99
 * The Mike Flowers Pops : 1999 : Lo Recordings : 99
 * Christian Vogel : "Whipaspank (Cylob mix)" : Novamute : 2000
 * "Synclair (Cylob Mix)" : Areal Records : 2007

title: Cylob


text:
Klášterec

Klášterec (means "little monastery") may refer to:
 * Klášterec nad Ohří
 * The Chateau at Klášterec nad Ohří
 * Klášterec nad Orlicí

title: Klášterec


text:
Aiskew

Aiskew is a village in the civil parish of Aiskew and Leeming Bar, in North Yorkshire, England. The village is situated to the immediate north-east of Bedale and separated from it by Bedale Beck.

History
Remains of a Roman villa were unearthed in 2015 north of Sand Hill. The building is thought to have been two storeys high with a hypocaust on the ground floor. Animal remains were found extensively across the site. It is thought the site dated from the third to fourth century AD and would have been situated along Dere Street. The site was covered as part of the construction of the Bedale, Aiskew and Leeming Bar bypass, which opened on 11 August 2016 as part of the upgrade to the A1(M).

The village was known as Echescol in Domesday Book in the Hundred of Count Alan of Brittany, the previous Lord having been Gospatric. The village had 7 ploughlands. The Lordship of the Manor followed that of neighbouring Bedale. The name is derived from Old Norse words eik (oak) and skógr (wood) and thus means Oak wood. Robert Hird, Bedale poet and diarist, noted that in late 18th Century the village name was spelled Ascough - he credits "Mr. Edward Strangeways, near Fencote" with the introduction of the modern spelling "by writing it Aiskew on his cartboard".

In 2013 Masons Gin established a distillery in the village.

Governance
The village lies within the Bedale ward and the Bedale Electoral Division of North Yorkshire County Council. Aiskew Civil Parish includes the village of Leeming Bar. Until 2023, it was part of the Richmond (Yorks) parliamentary constituency. It was removed and added to the expanded Thirsk and Malton Constituency, in part due to areas from that constituency being created into a new seat of Wetherby and Easingwold.

Demography
According to the 2001 UK Census, the population was 2,163 living in 863 dwellings. The 2011 UK Census showed this had increased to 2,427 in 985 dwellings.

Community
The village is in the Primary Education Catchment Area of Bedale Church of England Primary School, though it is also close to Aiskew, Leeming Bar Church of England Primary School, in Leeming Bar. It is within the Secondary Education Catchment Area of Bedale High School.

The Wensleydale Railway, a tourist and heritage line, includes Bedale station on the Aiskew side of Bedale Beck at the edge of the village. The signal box opposite Park House is a Grade II listed building.

In the village is the 18th-century Grade II listed Aiskew Mill with all its original wooden machinery. There is also an 18th-century Leech House next to the beck.

Religion

St Mary and St Joseph's Church, Bedale lies in the village. It was built in 1878, designed by Mr George Goldie of London, after the original chapel became too small for the congregation.

There had been both a Baptist church and Primitive Methodist Chapel in the village.

The Methodist Church in Aiskew, which was part of the Ripon & Lower Dales Methodist Circuit, has closed and the congregation merged with the Bedale & District Methodist Church.

title: Aiskew


text:
Novara FC

Novara Football Club, commonly referred to as Novara, is an Italian football club based in Novara, Piedmont.

The club was founded in 2021 by the City of Novara to replace old Novara Calcio that lost its professional status.

History
In December 1908 the F.A.S. (Football Association Studenti) was created by eight students of Liceo Carlo Alberto, aged between 15 and 16 years; among them an engineer, Gianni Canestrini, and a lawyer, Piero Zorini. In Novara in those days, there were other small clubs like Voluntas, Pro Scalon, Ginnastica e Scherma, Forza & Speranza, Collegio Gallarini and many other student bodies. The best players from these teams came together to form Novara Calcio, and made their debut in the Italian league on 3 November 1912.

The first match was played against a team already then established as Torino, who won 2–1.

In the years between World War I and World War II, Novara challenged with Pro Vercelli, Alessandria and Casale to make the so-called "quadrilatero piemontese" (Piedmont Quadrilateral). Novara played a Coppa Italia final against Inter Milan in 1939. Novara's highest finish came in 1952 when they finished in eighth place in Serie A.

During these years of staying in the top flight, Novara had Silvio Piola to thank. His many goals (which at the end of his career was over 300), made a huge contribution to the cause of Novara. Following his death in 1996, the stadium at which Novara play was dedicated in his name.

In 1956 came relegation to Serie B, and another five years afterwards, they slipped down to Serie C due to a fraudulent complaint by a Sambenedettese player.

A few successful seasons in Serie B followed, but then Novara stumbled again in 1977 with relegation to Serie C and worse in 1981 to Serie C2. In the 1995–96 season, Novara were back in Serie C1, but this joy was short-lived as the following year, the biancoazzurri again had to deal with relegation.

Years were spent in the shadows of Italian football until more recently when the league was won in the 2002–03 season.

From Serie C1 to Serie A
Consolidation in Serie C1 followed, later becoming Lega Pro Prima Divisione, until the historic promotion of the 2009–10 season where the club returned to Serie B after 33 years.

On 12 June 2011, Novara remarkably secured its promotion to Serie A after a 55-year absence from the league, by defeating Padova in the play-off final. Both consecutive promotions were achieved under the tenure of head coach Attilio Tesser, who was confirmed as Novara boss also for the following 2011–12 top flight campaign.

On 20 September 2011, the first home game in Serie A for 55 years, Novara recorded an historic 3–1 victory over Inter.

This remarkable feat, however, was not representative of their season as Novara managed to win only one more game until the end of January, when it won again against Inter in San Siro. The manager Attilio Tesser was replaced by veteran coach Emiliano Mondonico and re-hired one month later in a desperate and ultimately vain attempt by the owners to save the club from relegation. The club was immediately relegated again to Serie B after one season. Novara finished 5th in 2012–13 season but were eliminated by Empoli in the promotion play-offs. The following season was terrible for Novara as the club finished 19th in Serie B and lost in a play-out against Varese, losing 4–2 on aggregate. Thus, Novara were relegated to Lega Pro. Novara were crowned as champions of Group A of Lega Pro in 2014–15 and immediately returned to Serie B. In their first season back in Serie B they finished in a playoff spot but they lost to eventual winners Pescara in the semifinal. The following season saw them finish outside the playoffs in 9th, 4 points from a playoff spot. The following season saw Novara get relegated back to Lega Pro following a 20th-place finish in the 2017–18 Serie B.

During the summer of 2021, Novara lost its professional status and a phoenix club was founded in Serie D according to article 52 of FIGC's regulations NOIF. They were promoted back to Serie C in May 2022, after finishing top of their group in Serie D.

Managers

 * 🇭🇺 Ferenc Molnár (1931–32)
 * 🇭🇺 Árpád Weisz (1934–35)
 * 🇦🇷 Evaristo Barrera (1956–58)
 * 🇮🇹 Carlo Parola (1969–74)
 * 🇮🇹 Bruno Bolchi (1978–79)
 * 🇮🇹 Angelo Domenghini (1989–90)
 * 🇮🇹 Luigi Delneri (1992–94)
 * 🇮🇹 Franco Colomba (1994–95)
 * 🇮🇹 Alberto Marchetti (1999)
 * 🇮🇹 Giuliano Zoratti (1999–00)
 * 🇮🇹 Luciano Foschi (2002–04)
 * 🇮🇹 Antonio Cabrini (2005–06)
 * 🇮🇹 Attilio Tesser (2009–12), Emiliano Mondonico (2012), Attilio Tesser (2012)
 * 🇮🇹 Alfredo Aglietti (2012–13)
 * 🇮🇹 Alessandro Calori (2013–14)
 * 🇮🇹 Alfredo Aglietti (2014)
 * 🇮🇹 Marco Baroni (2015–16)
 * 🇮🇹 Roberto Boscaglia (2016–17)
 * 🇮🇹 Eugenio Corini (2017–18)
 * 🇮🇹 Domenico Di Carlo (2017–18)
 * 🇮🇹 William Viali (2018–19)
 * 🇮🇹 Giuseppe Sannino (2018–19)
 * 🇮🇹 William Viali (2018–19)
 * 🇮🇹 Simone Banchieri (2019–20)
 * 🇮🇹 Simone Banchieri (2020–21)
 * 🇮🇹 Michele Marcolini (2020–21)
 * 🇮🇹 Simone Banchieri (2020–21)
 * 🇮🇹 Marco Marchionni (2021–22)
 * 🇮🇹 Franco Semioli (2022–23)
 * 🇮🇹 Giacomo Gattuso (2023–24)

League

 * Serie B
 * Winners: 1926–27, 1937–38, 1947–48
 * Serie C
 * Winners: 1964–65, 1969–70, 2009–10, 2014–15
 * Serie C2
 * Winners: 1995–96
 * Serie D
 * Winners: 2021–22

Cups

 * Supercoppa di Serie C
 * Winners: 2010, 2015

title: Novara FC


text:
Breakfast News

Breakfast News is a breakfast news programme which first aired on BBC1 on 2 October 1989. The programme was previously known as Breakfast Time. It was planned to launch on 18 September 1989 but was held back by two weeks due to technical issues with its new studio. The programme adopted a rolling news format with news summaries every 15minutes plus weather and regional news every 30minutes. Other features included a review of the day's newspapers and regular business news updates.

From 22 November 1989, following the commencement of televised coverage of the House of Commons, the 8am to 8.15am part of the programme was simulcast on BBC2 as part of a new news hour which encompassed a review of the previous day's proceedings at Westminster. The final edition of Breakfast News aired on 15 September 2000 and on 2 October 2000 it relaunched as BBC Breakfast.

Presentation
The programme went through three main visual changes. The initial look lasted until 8 April 1993. The 13 April 1993 revamp saw the programme presented from the same set as the One, Six and Nine O'Clock News bulletins. A further and final revamp took place on 2 June 1997 when 'BBC' was shorn from its title, and on-screen it became known as simply Breakfast News. It was during this final period that the tone began to shift, with the return of a sofa set, alongside more features, and more interaction between the presenting team.

Broadcasting
BBC Breakfast News only aired from Mondays to Fridays with no weekend editions, although weekend editions were shown during the early stages of the 1991 Gulf War. This compares to their ITV counterparts TV-am and later GMTV who were on the air seven days a week. However, in September 1991 the BBC launched a short 5 minute weekend breakfast news summary. The Saturday edition aired at 7:25am to commence their Saturday schedule. The bulletin was not presented from the Breakfast News set, but from the main BBC News set based in the newsroom.

The Saturday breakfast bulletin was dropped from the schedules in the autumn of 1999 with the last Saturday morning bulletin airing on Saturday 11 September 1999. BBC Two had already been broadcasting an hour of news from BBC News 24, branded as "Weekend 24" on Saturday mornings from 8am to 9am since 31 January 1998, over two months after the launch of BBC News 24 and so the short Saturday breakfast news summary on BBC One started to become redundant. On Sundays the short morning bulletin would air at 9:10am and this would later be incorporated into the Breakfast with Frost programme which launched on 3 January 1993.

Business Breakfast
Business Breakfast was a daily news programme which aired between 6am and 7am, directly preceding Breakfast News between 4 January 1993 and 2000. Initially the programme aired as part of Breakfast News broadcasting between 6:34am and 6:55am. From Tuesday 4 January 2000 until Friday 15 September 2000, Business Breakfast was subsumed into the BBC Breakfast News programme with Breakfast News starting at 6am each weekday. Business Breakfast remained as a feature not a separate programme however, with business news a key feature in the first hour of the programme. This set up was to change from October 2000 with the launch of BBC Breakfast.

Breakfast News Extra
Breakfast News Extra launched on 5 February 1996, as an attempt to compete against Lorraine Kelly on GMTV. The programme was presented from the Breakfast News office, on a blue sofa, and hosted by Juliet Morris. It was short-lived, and was axed in the summer of 1997 with the last one shown on 29 August 1997. By this stage the main BBC Breakfast News had undergone a dramatic visual revamp with a new studio set which included sofas alongside the main presentation desk.

Notable presenters

 * Nicholas Witchell
 * Jill Dando
 * Sally Magnusson
 * Sara Coburn
 * Laurie Mayer
 * Justin Webb
 * Andrew Harvey
 * Juliet Morris
 * Fiona Bruce
 * Kirsty Wark
 * Noel Thompson
 * Michael Peschardt
 * John Nicolson
 * Huw Edwards
 * Sophie Raworth
 * Tanya Beckett
 * Jeremy Bowen
 * Julie Etchingham
 * Liz MacKean

title: Breakfast News


text: User talk:83.38.191.229

title: User talk:83.38.191.229


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalamaki

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. — J I P | Talk 16:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Kalamaki
Article claims this is a food (and appears to attack someone for not liking it); Google indicates that it's a non-notable resort. DS 18:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn; keep as a dab page. Nice work, people. DS 11:46, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Keep. Kalamiki is an island in Greece, not a food. It appears to be notable, so somebody should write an article on it. Andrew pmk | Talk 18:45, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This is unusual reasoning. Imagine an article saying "Brandham Regis are chips with curry gravy, and Tony Blair is daft for not touching them with a ten-foot pole" and keeping it until someone gets around to write "Brandham Regis is a fictional village in L.P. Hartley's novel ''The Go-Between" Pilatus 21:36, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, patent nonsense. Pilatus 21:36, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the rewritten version. Pilatus 14:05, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article appears to be correct in that it is a dish: however, whether a person likes it is of limited interest. However, What Links Here indicates that it is both a dish apparently served on skewers and towns or villages in Greece. I think that a disambiguation page is the best solution for this article but it would be good if we had a Greek person give their opinion.Capitalistroadster 23:41, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Besides the name of a beach resort, it seems to be a less-used synonym for souvlaki, i.e. cubes of grilled meat on a skewer. (Note to self: do research before voting) Pilatus 23:50, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * In that case, we should look at delinking the cuisine dishes that point here as in most cases they also refer to souvlaki. Looking at the Times Atlas, there are at least two Greek towns or villages of that name: a small town in Thessalia and a town in Zakynthos which has become a resort. A disambiguation page referring to the dish and these towns or villages would be appropriate. Capitalistroadster 00:21, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep --Rogerd 12:17, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I have changed this into a disambiguation page so keep. I have plans to sort out the what links here which are discussed on the article's talk page. Capitalistroadster 19:14, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as dab. MCB
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Baruni

Baruni is a Croatian pop band originating from Zagreb. The group was formed in 1991. The name "Baruni" (Croatian for "Barons") was given to them by Tomislav Ivčić. The group was previously signed to Croatia Records, but is currently working with rival Hit Records. They release their albums through in Bosnia through the label Hayat Production. They have been participated in the Croatian Radio Festival seven times and in the Etnofest Neum festival twice.

Band members

 * Miroslav Rus – songwriter
 * Danijel Banić – lead vocal
 * Jadranko Jagarinec – bass guitar
 * Dubravko Jagarinec – acoustic guitar
 * Jelena Domazet – keyboard
 * Zvonimir Domazet – electric guitar
 * Miroslav Budanko – drums
 * Tihomir Markulin – keyboard
 * Mladen Palenkaš – drums

Albums

 * Putuju i oblaci (1996)
 * Vrati se (1997)
 * Ulica Ilica (1998)
 * Cirkus (1999)
 * Otkad s tobom ne spavam (2002)
 * Ljubav nosi tvoje ime (2003)
 * Svanut' će jutro puno ljubavi (2007)

Singles

 * Neka pati koga smeta, Hrvatska je prvak svijeta (1998)

Compilations

 * Veliki hitovi 1 (2000)
 * Najbolje od najboljeg (2006)
 * Zlatna kolekcija (2011)

title: Baruni


text:
Daly Building

The Daly Building was a historic department store and office building in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, that was demolished with much controversy in 1991–92.

The building, designed by Moses Chamberlain Edey, opened as the T. Lindsay department store on June 21, 1905 and was Ottawa's first department store. It was located at the prominent intersection of Rideau Street and Sussex Drive. The building was the only Chicago Style structure built in Ottawa, and one of the few such buildings erected in Canada. Later owned by A.E. Rae & Co, it was expanded at the north end and two additional stories were added in 1913. H.J. Daly acquired the building in 1915.

The Daly Building became a government office building in 1921 and served this role for many decades. Owned by the National Capital Commission (NCC), they had the cornice removed in 1964 after stone fell from it killing a pedestrian on the street below. The building was left unrenovated. In 1978 it was abandoned as unsuitable for office work. During the 1980s, the NCC tried to find a company that would restore the building, and in 1987 a Montreal firm was given a $45 million contract to restore the structure. However, when the building was examined it was found that portions were structurally unsound, and if it were to be restored large sections would have to be wholly rebuilt. Further studies found that if left alone the building posed a danger to the public, and could collapse under winter snow.

The developers did not have the funds to do such an extensive project, and in a controversial decision the NCC chose not to look for a new partner and in September 1991 authorized the destruction of the building. This was the first designated heritage building destroyed in the city since the heritage guidelines were introduced in 1982. It was a hugely controversial decision in Ottawa, that drew much criticism of the NCC both for the years of neglect that let the building decline and for the final decision to demolish it. It was demolished piecemeal circa October 1991-March 1992.

The Daly Building site remained vacant for more than a decade. There was much discussion of what would be built there; some advocated a park, and for a time there was a scheme to build a national aquarium on the site. Eventually, the NCC leased the site to a developer who erected an 11-storey luxury apartment building, which opened in 2004.

title: Daly Building


text:
Talk:Illative case

[Untitled]
(a question copied from a comment inside. Seemed legitimate and appropriate for talk page.) - Is there an illative in Latvian too? - Latvians use the same locative both for locative and for illative!

i think some mention should be made that Latvian has had illative too.

Well, I came here from this article expecting a discussion of the illative participle in koine Greek, only to be disappointed. Does this case actually exist in this language, or is someone making up crap? (That is an accusation related to no original research, but not identical to it.) -- llywrch (talk) 20:40, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

- The Finnish illative formation is not fully presented. Instead of the -h@n ending, a -seen ending is used with some kinds of words, as demonstrated in the Finnish language version of the article. Examples: kangas (fabric) becomes kankaaseen, jäte (waste) becomes jätteeseen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mureon (talk • contribs) 03:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:Illative case