text:
Saint Pantaleon (disambiguation)

Saint Pantaleon was a legendary Christian martyr.

Saint Pantaleon may also refer to the following:

Places

 * Saint-Pantaléon, Lot, France
 * Saint-Pantaléon, Vaucluse, iFrance
 * Saint-Pantaléon-de-Lapleau, France
 * Saint-Pantaléon-de-Larche, France
 * Saint-Pantaléon-les-Vignes, France
 * Sankt Pantaleon, Austria
 * Sankt Pantaleon-Erla, Austria

Churches

 * Saint Pantaleon, Cologne, Germany
 * San Pantalon, Venice, Italy
 * San Pantaleo, Rome

title: Saint Pantaleon (disambiguation)


text:
User talk:Allixpeeke

Talk for this user has been archived at Archive Talk #1 as of Monday, July 7, 2008.

 * Welcome to Wikipedia!
 * Hi.
 * CLT Deletion
 * Thanks...
 * Conscription
 * Declaration of Independence
 * Please Help
 * Marijuana_Wiki
 * Nirvana
 * Page Blanking
 * PanTheist... perhaps also PanDeist?
 * Talk:Boston Tea Party
 * German Wiki
 * Category:Films which explore libertarian themes
 * The Picture of Me

 * Age category
 * CFD
 * DC Meetup notice
 * Objectivism and LaVeyan Satanism
 * Wikipedia:User categories for discussion on -isms
 * Massive taggings, etc.
 * mistaken identity
 * HUH?
 * DEFAULTSORT
 * Image copyright problem with Image:Mary J. Ruwart, M.D.jpg
 * Invitation to Anarchism Taskforce
 * Voluntaryism
 * Voluntaryist store
 * Shades of Pale

 * AfD nomination of Shades of Pale
 * Unspecified source for Image:Twe.jpg
 * Unspecified source for Image:8000000000000.jpg
 * Orphaned non-free media (Image:ShadesOfPale.gif)
 * (What Is) Libertarianism
 * Speedy deletion of Anarchism.net
 * Your edit to Flying Spaghetti Monster
 * Removal of category from your userpage
 * Collapsable sections
 * Progressive Libertarian Party
 * Wikipedia meetup
 * Hello
 * To all members of the Anarchist Task Force - about improvement of the AI-Wiki-page
 * Testing

Talk for this user has been archived at Archive Talk #2 as of Sunday, September 1, 2013.

 * Invitation
 * TfD nomination of libertarianism template
 * Libertarian Democrats
 * Agorism sidebar
 * Labor / Worker's Rights project
 * April 2009
 * D.C. Meetup, Saturday, June 6, 2009
 * Volunteer opportunity in Bethesda, Thursday, July 16
 * D.C. Meetup, Saturday, September 26
 * Move from where?
 * AfD nomination of Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism

 * Merch
 * Liberty Party (1840s)
 * James Eric Davidson
 * GLAM Baltimore 2011!
 * DC-area Meetup, Saturday, October 8
 * Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & DC Meetup 26!
 * Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-Thon and Meetup!
 * WikiProject C-SPAN?
 * Webinar / edit-a-thon at the National Library of Medicine (NLM)
 * Have time on Saturday?
 * DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, June 15!

 * Speedy deletion nomination of Urban Tarzan
 * Join us this Sunday for the Great American Wiknic!
 * DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, July 13!
 * You're Invited: Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the Smithsonian
 * Disambiguation link notification for July 29
 * DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, August 24!
 * Are you free on Wednesday? Join us at the Wikimedia DC WikiSalon!
 * Disambiguation link notification for August 25
 * Meet up with local Wikipedians on September 14!
 * Are you free next Thursday? Join us at the Wikimedia DC WikiSalon!
 * Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Take pictures of Baltimore for Wikipedia on September 21
Hello there! You are invited to attend Wikipedia Takes Baltimore on Saturday, September 21 at 1 PM. The goal of Wikipedia Takes Baltimore is to take pictures of nationally-recognized historic sites to upload to Wikimedia Commons, so if you have a camera (even a cell phone camera!), meet us on the north side of the Washington Monument on North Charles Street in Baltimore. Feel free to bring a car, too, since some of the sites are spread out. To learn more and sign up, see the event page. You can also RSVP on our Meetup page. I hope to see you there! Harej (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=575189393 your edit] to The Towerlight may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * and sentiment towards what happened at Virginia Tech. Letters to the Editor (  http://www.baltimorestudentmedia.com/pdf/2007/043007.pdf .pdf), The Towerlight (30 April 2007),

 * Thank you, BracketBot, for the helpful catch!

 * Cheers,
 * allixpeeke (talk) 20:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Straight quotes and apostrophes; WP:Trivia
Hi. Please review MOS:PUNCT and MOS:QUOTEMARKS, which explain that on Wikipedia we use straight quotes, like this: ", and apostrophes, like this: ', not curvy ones. This consistency throughout the encyclopedia aids in searches. Also, please see WP:TRIVIA.  It is not helpful to add items to "cultural reference" sections (or elsewhere in an article) that are mere passing mentions of a term or work of art. If, for example, a Star Trek episode is about Sherlock Holmes, and the character is discussed at length, then the episode could be mentioned in the Sherlock Holmes article; but if Capt. Picard merely *mentions* Sherlock Holmes in an episode, then it is not appropriate to add a reference to the episode in the Sherlock Holmes article.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

 * Oops! Sorry - my mistake on the Len song.  I didn't realize it was just a redirect.  I've taken it off the disambig page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:03, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

 * Cools. allixpeeke (talk) 05:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

 * Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AFI's 100 Years...100 Heroes & Villains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dæmon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Thanks, DPL bot, for again discussing disambiguation links with me. While, in the past, I have made changes based on your recommendations, DPL bot, I cannot at this time change the link.  Indeed, I thought about the disambiguation thing before adding that link, but added it anyway when I looked at the items featured on the disambiguation page.  Obviously, I couldn’t go with daemon (classical mythology) because the disambiguation page seemed to imply that daemon (classical mythology) was something benevolent.  Unclean spirit seemed to be closest to what I was looking for in describing Pazuzu, but since “unclean spirit” was such a weird term to use to describe a dæmon, I feared readers might infer an incorrect understanding of the phenomenon that took place in that film.  That’s why I went ahead and provided the disambiguation link—so that readers could find the disambiguation page and make their own judgment upon which link to click.  Cheers, allixpeeke (talk) 18:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)   P. S.  If, DPL bot, you think you have compelling reason to alter the link (say, to unclean spirit), please do present your rationale here, and I will consider it as objectively as I can.

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sam & Cat episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bibble (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Thanks, DPL bot, for yet again discussing disambiguation links with me. Just like last time, I am not going to change the link from bibble to anything else, since there is no wikipedia article that describes how bibble is a fictional caramel popcorn from the T. V. shows Victorious and Sam & Cat other than the disambiguation page.  But, if you, DPL bot, decide to create a page called bibble (fictional caramel popcorn), then I will happily change the link.  Cheers! allixpeeke (talk) 05:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Austrian economics sanctions
FYI, there are Austrian economics/General sanctions including Rothbard article so you might watch your # of reverts. Also an Arbitration that should be over in about a week. Check it out here. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 05:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Rothbard talk
It is refreshing to read a new voice in these discussions. Alas, suffers from TLDR. (That is, at least for the moment. I'll be looking at it more sometime tomorrow.) No matter how the discussion turns out, thank you for the contribution. – S. Rich (talk) 04:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi.
Hi, it's Mary Feronia. I finally signed up for my own wikipedia account. Anarchafeminist (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

 * Cool. allixpeeke (talk) 17:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been active at the article or talk page, so here's a note about Anarcho-capitalism
I have nominated Anarcho-capitalism for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Binksternet (talk) 18:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Dickens's
I've removed "'s" once again from Template:A Christmas Carol. While some scholars seem to prefer that form, all sources I have looked into state that omitting the s is widely accepted and to only add it when ambiguity arises, or if such were pronounced in speech. Both are not the case, so the s is omitted. We do follow common practice rather than specific stylebooks. Please keep that in mind and do not try to make Wikipedia conform to one specific rule of grammar. 11:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

 * (1) It's not pronounced in speech? Since when?  Granted, I don't say the name Charles Dickens very often, but if I were to find an occasion to say aloud the words "Charles Dickens's dog," I would say it with six syllables, not five.  I would worry that not doing so would elicit the question, "Who is Charles Dicken?" (2) You implore that people "not try to make Wikipedia conform to one specific rule of grammar."  Should this be taken to mean that Wikipedia should conform to multiple rules of grammar, rules that may very well conflict with one another?  And, if so, to how many different, conflicting rules of grammar should Wikipedia conform?  If that sounds curt, my apologies.  I say this only to stress that there is a logical reason to have grammatical standards.  (3) You say that "all sources" (emphasis added) into which you've looked "state that omitting the s is widely accepted and to only add it when ambiguity arises, or if such were pronounced in speech."  In my edit, I cited Strunk's The Elements of Style and the Chicago Manual of Style, into neither of which you've apparently looked.  I'll start with the weaker of the two: the Chicago Manual of Style.  Here's what they say on their website: "Q. When indicating possession of a word that ends in s, is it correct to repeat the s after using an apostrophe?  For example, which is correct: 'Dickens' novel' or 'Dickens's novel'? A.  Either is correct, though we prefer the latter."I disagree with them that "either" is correct, but I applaud them for realising that the latter is much more rational than the former.  In any event, that source clearly disagrees with any source that discourages the   's in "Dickens's." Now, on to Strunk's The Elements of Style: "Follow this rule whatever the final consonant. Thus write, Charles's friend Burns's poems the witch's malice"This is the usage of the United States Government Printing Office and of the Oxford University Press. Exceptions are the possessives of ancient proper names in -es and -is, the possessive Jesus' , and such forms as for conscience' sake, for righteousness' sake. This is another source that source clearly disagrees with any source that discourages the   's in "Dickens's." Now, maybe when you wrote "do not try to make Wikipedia conform to one specific rule of grammar," you were trying to say that I oughtn't take The Elements of Style as gospel.  If so, fear not: I don't.  As far as I am concerned, Strunk is completely wrong to suggest that it is in any way okay to write Jesus'   (unless the author is referring to multiple people named Jesus who all happen to possess the same thing).  (4) You write, "and to only add it when ambiguity arises."  If you stick with my method, ambiguity never arises.  But, when the s is removed from a name, ambiguity is necessarily introduced into the situation.  The reader isn't sure if we're talking about about one person named Charles Dickens (in which case the writer obviously accidentally left off the s) or multiple people all with the same name who just happen to possess the same thing (in which case the writer correctly and intentionally left off the s).  As it stands, this is actually the case we now face.  Wikipedia is implying that there are multiple people all with the same name who happened to write A Christmas Carol together.  Wikipedia is currently wrong.  (5) Insofar as leaving-the-s-off-of-possessive-singular-nouns is a "common practice," as you so describe it, I would say that it is more accurate to call this a common mistake.  I look forward to the day when such things as (A) leaving the s off of singular possessive nouns, (B) prohibitions on splitting infinitives, and (C) the singular "they" are relegated to the dustbins of history.  Respectfully yours, allixpeeke (talk) 12:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

 * If you do'n't agree, take this to WP:GRAMMAR. Also worth reading is WP:ENGVAR; we're dealing with a British subject, and they don't follow US style. I'm not going to adress each point, except to say that your premise to say that the current form somehow indicates a plural form is totally off. Were the noun plural, then the s would make sense. Omitting the s actually makes it dingular. The plural would be "Dickenses's". 14:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

 * No. "The cat's toy" means there's a single cat possessing the cat toy.  "The cats' toy" means there are multiple cats possessing the cat toy.  "The cats's toy" means someone bearing the title "cats" possesses the toy.  "The Cats's toy" means someone named "The Cats" possesses the toy.  And "The Cats' toy" means that some family with the surname "Cat" possesses the toy.  And "The Catses' toy" means that some family with either the surname "Cats" or the surname "Catse" possesses the toy. As it so happens, although Wikipedia's official policy doesn't (unfortunately) take a position on the question of whether we should write "Dickens's novel" or "Dickens' novel (instead simply saying that we should be consistent within a given article), it does agree with me that plural nouns are made possessive by not adding the s after the apostrophe.  MOS:POSS says, "For a normal plural noun, ending with a pronounced s, form the possessive by adding just an apostrophe (my sons' wives, my nieces' weddings)."  Thus, I am correct when I say that "the cats' toy" implies a plurality of cats possessing the toy.  You write, "we're dealing with a British subject, and they don't follow US style."  I follow a consistent mixture of the two standards  Thus, I say "aluminium" instead of "aluminum" and "the team had its first victory" instead of "the team had their first victory," just as the English would say, but I still say "go to the hospital" instead of "go to hospital" and "head toward the university" instead of "head toward university."  I happily write "colour" and "fantasise" and "programme" and "fœtus" instead of "color" or "fantasize" or "program" or "fetus," but I still use "elevators" as opposed to "lifts" and "periods" as opposed to "full stops."  I always use the short scale for numbers, but I much prefer the metric system over the English system.  (That said, I still use the English system since it's a tad hard to escape.)  Just like the English, I list the day before the month before the year, since it seems utterly irrational to put the day between the month and the year, but I still use A . M . and P . M . when telling time.  (As an aside, I also look forward to the obliteration of Daylight Savings Time, but who doesn't?  Even farmers don't want it.)  But quotation marks is where it gets interesting.  The English will usually place a period or comma outside of the quotation marks in all instances safe for instances where the period or comma is part of the quote itself, while this is completely wrong in American English.  I tend to follow the American standard on this one even though the British standard is more rational; however, I do tend to follow the British standard when writing on Wikipedia.  Should the British standard on comma/period placement vis-à-vis quotation marks start to be accepted in these United States, I'll happily revert to their superior system on that one as well.  In any event, I have never heard or read anywhere anything saying that it's more appropriate to leave the s off of "Dickens's" in the Kingdom than it is in the States, so I am not entirely sure of the relevance of bringing up the fact that there are some standards vary internationally.  Best regards, allixpeeke (talk) 02:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll. To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Jem and the Holograms (film) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=688265782 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F688265782%7CJem and the Holograms (film)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
 * Freedom Party of New York (2010)
 * added a link pointing to Freedom Party of New York
 * List of libertarian political parties
 * added a link pointing to Objectivism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Thank you, DPL bot, for bringing this to my attention. I went ahead and fixed the Objectivism one, but I intended for the Freedom Party of New York one to link to the disambiguation page.  Cheers, allixpeeke (talk) 09:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
 * United States presidential election, 2012
 * added links pointing to Reform Party, Jim Gray, KRMG and Socialist Workers Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

 * Thank you, DPL bot, for bringing this to my attention. I went ahead and fixed all four.  Cheers, allixpeeke (talk) 09:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Please rescue the article on Mircea Itu
Hello, Please help me with getting the article on Mircea Itu published on Wikipedia. I highly appreciate your expertise and support. I strongly believe that this academic is notable to have a page on Wikipedia, despite some deletitionists' view. Thank you in advance. Clairec78 (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

 * Thank you, Clairec78, for bringing this to my attention. I tossed in my two cents here.  Best, allixpeeke (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

JSTOR
You should have received an email from me with a link to a form to complete; could you please either complete it, or email me if you didn't get it? Nikkimaria (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

 * Completed. Thank you.  : )  allixpeeke (talk) 08:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Nicknames for OUAT list of characters
Hello and I had read your message on the talk page. Firstly, I understand your intentions of putting the nicknames into columns, but this page has been using its own style/format since the beginning and had been doing it like that. We use this style : Red Lucas/Red Riding Hood/Wolf as its used in their history section. It's like a title that these characters used on the show as it progresses. Regina for example goes by as Regina Mills in her earlier life but then she became the Evil Queen and has never been reffered as Regina again by majority of the inhabitants. Another example is Cora. She is Cora Mills and after her banishment to Wonderland, she becomes the Queen of Hearts and is referred as that during her time in Wonderland. Anastasia is another example. After she came to Wonderland, she married the Red King and became the Red Queen and later the White King. Besides that, these titles are not really nicknames as its official titles given to the characters. Nicknames are as follow : 1) Emma who uses Princess Leia when she came to the past Ehcnhanted Forest. She uses it as an alias and is not an official name nor title she has. The Savior or The Dark Swan is also some titles which isn't an official thing as that isn't something she is based as. These titles refers to who/what they became later in life. Like Killian Jones became Captain Hook after Liam's death and decides to leave the King.  2) Hook uses another alias Prince Charles as well. That is also a nickname or alias. Something fake. Nicknames can also be considered as short form names. Example: Lilith Page. Her nickname is Lily or Prince David who's nicknamed as Charming. Therefore, in the columns, we only put their original names and sometimes nicknames like this : Lilith "Lily" Page or place the nickname in a reference way like Charming. And I say again, that way is more organized as some characters don't have names and only titles. The Huntsmans, Red King etc. titles are as important their name as it is used by them and the inhabitants as well. It's a systematic way which had been used and followed throughout the years. I however would like to apologize if you feel offended or hurt in any way when I said your edits are unorganized nor messy. It's just that it's better and better organized when " / " is used in between of the names and titles. Edit : I forgot to mentions or reply to these stuffs. 1) Belle French. I understand your intentions here, but her Real World name isn't Belle French. During the First curse, it was never known what her name was but when Regina turned Belle to her cursed self, she is Lacey, but I will agree 100% with you to but Belle Frech but in the Land With Magic column as that's her name back in her land. 2){N/A or Unknown.I know you are trying to tell that they have a Real World counterpart but we have chosen N/A} instead of the other because we will never know their counterpart unless stated otherwise. Besides that N/A} is easier as there are some characters which we don't know whether they were in the Real World during the first curse, such as Glinda, Blackbeard, King Midas so {N/A fits perfectly for all the characters in the list. In the history section, it's already noted that they were brought by the curse, so us viewers have to assumed that they had a Real World counterpart. Entirely, we don't know if they even had a counterpart. Take a look at Jefferson or Granny. Both got their same names from their land as their counterpart and Regina chose to use her own name as her counterpart, meaning not entirely everyone got a new persona during their time in the Real World. So, if we put "Unknown" it's kinda speculation that we are trying to say that they had a counterpart Naveenruben97 (talk) 05:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

 * Response here. allixpeeke (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Worlds page had been deleted/moved/redirect
Hey, I know we have had our differences before regarding some matter, but I would like to ask for your help. The world's page for ONCE UPON A TIME is gone as it's stated that the list is "just a list of unsourced fan stuff" by the user who redirected it. I stated at the above of the page that some (meaning location names) was taken there, but the user got rid of the entire page as he thinks everything is "unsourced fan stuff". Here's a conversation I started with the user = User talk:Drmies would you like to help me out and give your own thoughts about the situation in the link provided? Thanks :) Naveenruben97 (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

 * See User_talk:Rtkat3. Naveenruben97, beware of Drmies (talk) 13:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

 * Drmies, I am not a victim of canvassing at this time. Canvassing is something that is done "with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way," and since Naveenruben97 has no way of knowing whether or not I will agree with her or him on this topic, she or he cannot be accused of trying to influence the outcome of the discussion.  Naveenruben97 targeted me specifically because she or he knows that I have opinions regarding articles related to Once Upon a Time, and therefore we must conclude that Naveenruben97 was merely attempting to "improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus," which, according to WP:CAN, is "perfectly acceptable."  Regards, allixpeeke (talk) 01:44, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

 * Naveenruben97, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I shan't respond on Drmies's talk page since she or he had deleted the conversation you began there.  Fortunately, I can read it here.  Further, I see the discussion has been moved here.  I shall place my response there.  Again, thanks for bringing this to my attention.  Yours, allixpeeke (talk) 01:44, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Drmies, I am not asking allixpeeke to support me in any way, I'm just telling him/her to give his/her thoughts in the problem. I'm only asking him/her to include his/herself into the discussion as he/she is one of the active users whom edits the page and deserves the rights to know what had happened to the page and what is the ongoing discussion for the page. Naveenruben97 (talk) 03:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Settle down y'all. I just said "beware". Drmies (talk) 14:30, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Libertarian National Convention, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin McCormick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Libertarian Review, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed Crane. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

 * Thanks you, DPL bot. It is now fixed.  allixpeeke (talk) 13:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Old MacDonald Had a Farm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 * Thanks you, DPL bot. It is now fixed.  allixpeeke (talk) 22:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Shearonink (talk) 22:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

I know you're an experienced editor and that you don't really need the following but thought it might be useful...
Adding references can be easy Hello! Here's how to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain the Wikipedia policy of verifiability.

Adding well formatted references is actually quite easy:
 * 1) While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "Cite". Click on it.
 * 2) Then click on "Templates".
 * 3) Choose the most appropriate template and fill in as many details as you can. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the web URL (or "website link") becomes inactive in the future.
 * 4) Click on Preview when you're done filling out the 'Cite (web/news/book/journal)' to make sure that the reference is correct.
 * 5) Click on Insert to insert the reference into your editing window content.
 * 6) Click on Show preview to Preview all your editing changes.
 * Before clicking on Save page, check that a References header  ==References==  is near the end of the article.
 * And check that    is directly underneath that header.
 * 7.Click on Save page. ...and you've just added a complete reference to a Wikipedia article.

You can read more about this on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv.

Hope this helps, --Shearonink (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

 * To use this message, place  on User:talk pages when needed.

 * I noticed you were going back later to fill in references at "Alexander Hamilton and slavery" so thought this maybe could help. Please delete this information if it is unwanted. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

A WikiCookie for you!

 * Scrumptious. Thank you.  allixpeeke (talk) 02:59, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

 * Sphinx
 * added links pointing to Tomorrow and Order

 * Ancient Egyptian deities in popular culture
 * added a link pointing to Guilt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

 * Thank you, DPL bot, for the heads up, once again. So, I went ahead and changed the links to tomorrow and guilt to tomorrow (time) and guilt (emotion) respectively, but I left the link to order as is.  Dost thou haveth any thoughts thereupon, DPL bot? Yours sincerely, allixpeeke (talk) 15:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)  P. S.  I've been meaning to ask you this, DPL bot:  You write, "We noticed."  Who exactly is the "we" in that sentence?  Are there multiple humans that were involved in this noticing, and if so, who?  (Obviously, you can't be referring to yourself in saying that since, well, you are not capable of noticing.  Oh, sure, you're capable of detecting, but noticing is something that requires a mind, which, as far as I am aware, you do not possess.)

3.14159265358979323846 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.14159265358979323846. Since you had some involvement with the 3.14159265358979323846 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 3.14159265358979

A tag has been placed on 3.14159265358979, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

3.1415926535897932385 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.1415926535897932385. Since you had some involvement with the 3.1415926535897932385 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

3.141592653589793238 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.141592653589793238. Since you had some involvement with the 3.141592653589793238 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

3.14159265358979324 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.14159265358979324. Since you had some involvement with the 3.14159265358979324 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

3.1415926535897932 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.1415926535897932. Since you had some involvement with the 3.1415926535897932 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

3.141592653589793 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.141592653589793. Since you had some involvement with the 3.141592653589793 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

3.1415926535898 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.1415926535898. Since you had some involvement with the 3.1415926535898 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Zeta Project episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rob Davies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Thanks, again, DPL bot. I went ahead and disambiguated the link.  allixpeeke (talk) 22:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2.7

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as 2.7, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A412 (Talk • C) 23:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Decimal approximations of irrational numbers are now deemed "inappropriate"? allixpeeke (talk) 09:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Two witnesses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sumerian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Well, tell you what, DPL bot: I was just about to go fix that, per your reasoned suggestion, when I discovered that it had already been fixed by one Egsan Bacon. Thus, all is good.  Cheers, allixpeeke (talk) 11:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Alfred Hitchcock Presents episodes into List of Alfred Hitchcock Presents (1985 TV series) episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up and for adding the notation within the edit summaries. I added the copied template to the talk page.  Cheers, allixpeeke (talk) 13:53, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a webhost
Hi Allixpeeke. This is a friendly reminder that your 32 sub pages are a violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST. Please nominate them for deletion. May I suggest that you create your own server and host MediaWiki. That way you can host whatever material you want. Thank you David. moreno 72    05:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

 * 1) I do not have 32 subpages. Half of those are redirects.  (E.g., lists/ redirects to lists.)
 * 2) I removed the plurals subpage. I was using it to improve my own edits to Wikipedia by making my edits more accurate in their use of plurals (see, e.g., the effort discussed here at incorporating accurate pluralisations), and while I think it could also be useful to other users in the same pursuit, I went ahead and deleted its content as a show of good faith.
 * 3) My subpages are not a violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST.
 * 4) My subpages do not serve as personal webpages. For the most part, they are as useful to other users as they are to me. (Moreover, what few exceptions to this do not encapsulate any entire page.  Although my list of lists subpage, e.g., does contain a couple lists that are not of great use to other users (e.g., lists#List of stupid slang), those inserts are small and do not greatly detract from the overall purpose of the list, which is to aid me in developing lists that will later be turned into Wikipedia articles.  By contrast, my lists#List of films featuring the Statue of Liberty (which is also on that list of lists) is a work in progress that I intend to eventually turn directly into an article titled List of films featuring the Statue of Liberty, and which will complement the List of films featuring the World Trade Center.  Indeed, almost all of the lists on that list of lists are intended to eventually be turned into articles, or at least be used as aids in the construction of articles.)
 * 5) My subpages do not serve as blogs. (That's probably obvious.  I shan't belabour that point.)
 * 6) Although my subpages are repositories for large amounts of material, they are not repositories for large amounts of material irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. Not one of my subpages lack material relevant to collaborating on Wikipedia, and the vast majority of the content 'on' said pages are directly relevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. (Take, e.g., my art subpage.  Obviously, the purpose of the page is to help me to know which of the various famous works of art that should have articles written about them currently lack articles (along with other information and sources that would be helpful in the construction of said articles).  It also embodies the collaborative element in that anyone looking at that list can use it for this purpose.  Or, take, as another example, this list of books in the Judeo-Christian Bible.  This list (which is sortable: one can sort the books by the religion/denomination one needs) is obviously also useful for the augmentation (and even creation) of articles pertaining to decisions made by religious authorities as to the texts they deem canonical and the comparative orders of their respective canons, and of articles pertaining to comparative religious studies generally.  Ultimately, the purpose of all of my subpages (with the exception of my sandbox, the main purpose of which is to test wiki-based coding) is to facilitate article creation and augmentation.  Thus, my subpages are within the purview of acceptable purposes for subpages on Wikipedia.  (And even my sandbox does contain some material that I intend to turn into a bona fide article, viz., the information about The Independents.))
 * 7) I have no need to use Wikipedia in order to post a résumé, nor as a personal webpage. I have a personal website for that sort of thing.  My every subpage is used in order to aid Wikipedia.
 * 8) None of my subpages are used for social networking, nor have I a single webpage dedicated to amusement. My every subpage is used in order to aid Wikipedia.
 * 9) I have not uploaded files to Wikipedia is nearly a decade. Rather, I upload them in the appropriate place: Wikimedia Commons.
 * 10) I do not use my subpages as a dating service. I do not use them as memorial pages.  And every subpage of mine contains content for projects related to Wikipedia.
 * In summation, my subpages are all valid. Respectfully yours, allixpeeke (talk) 06:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Singles: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Wood ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Singles:_Original_Motion_Picture_Soundtrack check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Singles:_Original_Motion_Picture_Soundtrack?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

 * Thank you, DPL bot, for bringing this to my attention. I was just about to go fix it, but I see Rodw has already fixed it.  Thus, my thanks also to Rodw for this fix.  Cheers, allixpeeke (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexander Hamilton and slavery

The article Alexander Hamilton and slavery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: This WP:POVFORK article relies so heavily on unreliable sources that it is worthy of deletion.

 * Michelle DuRoss is the most heavily cited and quoted single source for this page. She is identified here as a history professor and as a historian. Her publication is cited 29 times as footnote 9, and 7 more times as footnote 23.

 * DuRoss's list of publications on Google Scholar is a total of two, the other one being her dissertation. As it turns out, DuRoss seems to have been either a Ph.D. student at SUNY Albany, or a very recent Ph.D. graduate, when the cited article was written. She was definitely not a professor when it was written.

 * If we look at the journal that published her article, Early America Review, we find that it wasn't exactly a peer-reviewed scholarly publication, per WP:SCHOLARSHIP. It was an Internet journal (see From the Publisher). I saw no indication that this journal even had an editor; submissions were directed to the publisher (see submission guidelines), and it appeared to be a one-man operation.

 * Ishmael Reed is cited here for two articles, both extensively quoted here. The first article by Reed is cited 10 times (footnote 10), and the second is cited 4 times (footnote 14). In both of them, Reed in turn quotes and relies upon "Professor Michelle Duross, of the University at Albany, State University of New York", which he writes out in full both times, inflating her appearance of authority to bolster his own. The reliability of these two Reed references can be judged (per WP:NOTRELIABLE and WP:BIASED) by reading Wikipedia's article on CounterPunch, the magazine in which they were both published.

 * Allan McLane Hamilton, cited here 5 times (footnote 1), may be the original source of all allegations that Hamilton owned slaves, and is relied on by other cited references. He wrote a biography of his grandfather, whom he never knew personally. Dr. Hamilton was a psychiatrist and medical doctor, but it is misleading to identify him as a "historian" as this article does. Dr. Hamilton looked at his grandfather's business ledgers, and characterized several cryptic entries as evidence that Hamilton had purchased a slave for himself. It appears that unless Hamilton clearly identified that a particular purchase was done on behalf of a named legal client or family member (such as John Barker Church), his grandson simply assumed without proof that Hamilton was buying a slave for himself. (There are no citations to any of Hamilton's correspondence or writings that would indicate that he owned slaves, and no cited evidence of slaves in Hamilton's will or in lists of his assets.)

 * Original research or synthesis
 * Footnotes 37, 38, and 41 appear to be original research.
 * Primary sources are cited at footnotes 16, 21, 22, 26-28, 30, 39, and 40. The passages that rely on them may be impermissible synthesis, or may be missing the citation to their actual source.

 * Self-published sources
 * A self-published Tumblr post, http://alexanderhammyton.tumblr.com/post/144430999866/on-hamilton-and-slavery, is cited here 11 times (footnote 12).
 * A self-published book by Alan J. Clark (published using Author House) is cited as footnote 33.
 * A self-published blog post by Jack Stanley, http://edisoneffect.blogspot.com/2012/08/was-aaron-burr-really-as-bad-as-we-say.html, is cited as footnote 35.
 * A self-published Reddit comment by "silveredbow" is cited 7 times (footnote 36).

For at least those reasons, I propose deleting Alexander Hamilton and slavery. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 22:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 22:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexander Hamilton and slavery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Hamilton and slavery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alexander Hamilton and slavery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 22:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:People and slavery
Template:People and slavery has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  09:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Are You Afraid of the Dark? episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluebell ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Are_You_Afraid_of_the_Dark%3F_episodes check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Are_You_Afraid_of_the_Dark%3F_episodes?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Divine Invasion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Godhead ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Divine_Invasion check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Divine_Invasion?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lucifer (season 1)

Hello, Allixpeeke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucifer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cpt Viraj  (Talk) 15:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

 * Huh? I created a draft for Lucifer (season 1)?  Are you sure?  allixpeeke (talk) 07:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Alliance of the Libertarian Left listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alliance of the Libertarian Left. Since you had some involvement with the Alliance of the Libertarian Left redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

 * Thanks. allixpeeke (talk) 07:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of religious ideas in science fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adversary ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_religious_ideas_in_science_fiction check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_religious_ideas_in_science_fiction?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, it seemed the only truly appropriate selection. Linking directly to Satan would have been both redundant and nonelucidatory.  allixpeeke (talk) 07:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Castle Freak, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. . We require sources for these release dates. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lucifer (season 1)

Hello, Allixpeeke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucifer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

 * Wait, Liz, you're saying I created a draft of Lucifer (season 1) six months ago and forgot about it? What was the contents of this alleged draft?  (I genuinely have no recollection of this.)  Please let me know.  (Also, if the draft seemed basically complete, you have my blessing to just publish it.)  Thanks in advance, allixpeeke (talk) 09:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Dungeonmaster, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages African and Beast.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Christmas-themed literature
Template:Christmas-themed literature has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  13:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

 * Thank you for letting me know,  wooden superman . I have responded as follows:
 * Keep—Very useful aid for navigating through the various Christmas-themed works of literature, particularly useful to any Wikipedian looking to research said works of literature. Template is narrowly confined to Christmas literature, excluding Christmas songs, films, television, and paintings.  Works included are more than just "tangentially related"; said works often include (besides Christmas itself) other similar and overlapping themes, too, such as giving, kindness, and magic, if not similar settings (Winter, snow), characters (Santa), and other motifs rarely found outside of Christmas-themed literature. Template is no more inexhaustible than any other media-based template; by this I mean to say that, while more Christmas-themed novels may be written over time and thus added, the same can be said of, e.g., Foo Fighters songs being added over time to Template:Foo Fighters, and I do not believe Christmas-themed novels are being written as rapidly as Foo Fighters songs.  (If it is protested that Template:Foo Fighters, e.g., is shorter than Template:Christmas-themed literature, it should be recognized that, even though Christmas has been around for one-hundred-times as long as Foo Fighters, the template is only twice-as-long.) Whereas something like Template:Literature with dogs or Template:Literature about love certainly would be far too inexhaustible to be useful, this is not; Christmas-themed literature is far more narrowly delimited, and certainly sufficiently delimited to make it not-too inexhaustible.  Christmas-themed works include so many recurring motifs that said works are easily related to one another, which would not be the case with Template:Literature with dogs or Template:Literature about love. allixpeeke (talk) 19:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * allixpeeke (talk) 19:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for creating the navbox. I've asked the closer to reconsider closing the little-attended nomination (please see User talk:Explicit and maybe comment, thanks). The problem with the navbox was including the authors, which bloated it, but it is a very good navbox and should be both kept and used on the pages. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * My edits for brevity User:Randy Kryn/Christmas literature navbox. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

"Agorism.info" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agorism.info&redirect=no Agorism.info] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Anarchism checking in
Hey there! I noticed you're on the WikiProject Anarchism members list, but you don't appear to have edited in this subject area for some time. Just in case you're still interested, here's a little update:
 * In the past couple years, we have brought four articles to Featured status, including the ones on Nestor Makhno, La Salute è in voi, The May Pamphlet and "The Day Before the Revolution". We're likely to get even more to this status in the near future, so stay tuned to the front page for some of our best articles on the platform.
 * A number of our most vital articles have been reviewed and achieved Good Article status, including ones on Gaetano Bresci, Camilo Cienfuegos, Joseph Déjacque, Luigi Galleani, Paul Goodman, and the Kronstadt rebellion. As these "vital articles" are generally considered among the most important on the platform, we aim to get as many as possible to GA and FA status over the coming years.
 * We recently hit the first milestone for our stub-expansion project, getting the number of stubs down to under 1/5th of our total articles. This means that the vast majority of our articles are now relatively substantial, as we expand and add greater detail to the articles that lack sufficient information. We hope to narrow this number down even further, so more articles have the information they deserve.
 * We just started a cleanup drive, in which we are aiming to resolve the problematic parts of our articles, from finding citations for unsourced sections to fixing up formatting errors. In doing this, we intend to make sure our articles provide the best possible reading experience, without unsourced claims or ugly tags littering the page.

If you want to get more involved in the project, please feel free! We always need an extra pair of hands to help out with our ever-growing project. If you want to help out with one of the above efforts, go right ahead. If you want to keep more up to date with the project's activities, consider adding our noticeboard to your watchlist or adding your name to our mailing list. On the other hand, if you think you're time with the project is over, then consider removing your name from the members list, but we do hope you're still interested in our wee project.

All the best to you, whatever your future plans are. Regards, --Grnrchst (talk) 10:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Varies/doc
Template:Varies/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Allixpeeke


text:
Akra Township, Pembina County, North Dakota

Akra Township is a township in Pembina County, North Dakota, United States.

History
Akra Township was organized in 1882, and was known as one of the "Icelandic Townships," due to its large population of Icelanders who had settled here. Akra takes its name from Akranes, Iceland, a town near Reykjavík. Akra Township was a "double township," spanning two full survey townships. In 1888, the northern part of the township was separated and organized separately as Avon Township (now Advance Township).

Geography
Icelandic State Park and the adjacent Renwick Dam and Lake Renwick are located in Akra Township.


text:
Georg Dionysius Ehret

Georg Dionysius Ehret (30 January 1708 – 9 September 1770) was a German botanist and entomologist known for his botanical illustrations.

Life

Ehret was born in Germany to Ferdinand Christian Ehret, a gardener and competent draughtsman, and Anna Maria Ehret. Beginning his working life as a gardener's apprentice near Heidelberg, he became one of the most influential European botanical artists of all time. His first illustrations were in collaboration with Carl Linnaeus and George Clifford in 1735-1736. Clifford, a wealthy Dutch banker and governor of the Dutch East India Company was a keen botanist with a large herbarium. He had the income to attract the talents of botanists such as Linnaeus and artists like Ehret. Together at the Clifford estate, Hartecamp, which is located south of Haarlem in Heemstede near Bennebroek, they produced Hortus Cliffortianus in 1738, a masterpiece of early botanical literature.

As a result of exploitation by Johann Wilhelm Weinmann, Ehret finished only 500 plates of a 1,000 plate commission and moved to England, where he was promoted by Sir Hans Sloane, Dr Mead and the bluestocking Duchess of Portland. “While he did not slavishly imitate what he saw, neither did he allow his feeling for the color and design of flowers distract him from the fundamentals of plant structure," Wilfrid Blunt observed in The Art of Botanical Illustration. Ehret was in great demand. Engravings after his botanical paintings illustrated Mark Catesby's works on the flora and fauna of the New World. Engravings from his series Plantae et Papiliones Rariores, 1748-59, found their way onto Chelsea porcelain For Philip Miller he illustrated many of the more spectacular plants that were in cultivation in the Chelsea Physic Garden. Ehret was at the top of his profession in 1768 when the young botanist Joseph Banks returned from Labrador and Newfoundland with the botanical specimens that made his early reputation; it was to Ehret he turned for meticulous paintings on vellum.

Ehret's original art work may be found at the Natural History Museum in London, the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, The Royal Society, London, the Lindley Library at the Royal Horticultural Society, the Victoria and Albert Museum, at the University Library of Erlangen, the LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden, and the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

The genus Ehretia was named in his honour.

Works

 * Methodus plantarum sexualis (1736)
 * Hortus nitidissimis (in 3 volumes, 1750-1786)
 * The Natural History of Barbados,, Griffith Hughes, 1750.
 * Plantae et papiliones rariores. This was published in parts from 1748 until 1759 in folio. The eighteen plates were engraved and hand-colored by Ehret himself. Most display a combination of one or more species of plants and of butterflies.
 * Illustrations for Plantae selectae by Christoph Jakob Trew. Another copy of Plantae selectae at Missouri Botanical Gardens.
 * Illustrations for "The Gardeners Dictionary" by Philip Miller, Seventh Edition, 1756-1759 (also reprinted in the Eighth, 1768), 16 plates
 * Illustrations for Hortus Kewensis by William Aiton (in 3 volumes, 1789)
 * Illustrations for Patrick Browne's spectacular The Civil and Natural History of Jamaica in three parts published in 1756.

title: Georg Dionysius Ehret


text:
Square lattice

In mathematics, the square lattice is a type of lattice in a two-dimensional Euclidean space. It is the two-dimensional version of the integer lattice, denoted as $\mathbb{Z}^2$. It is one of the five types of two-dimensional lattices as classified by their symmetry groups; its symmetry group in IUC notation as $p4m$, Coxeter notation as $[4,4]$, and orbifold notation as $
 * 442$.

Two orientations of an image of the lattice are by far the most common. They can conveniently be referred to as the upright square lattice and diagonal square lattice; the latter is also called the centered square lattice. They differ by an angle of 45°. This is related to the fact that a square lattice can be partitioned into two square sub-lattices, as is evident in the colouring of a checkerboard.

Symmetry
The square lattice's symmetry category is wallpaper group $p4m$. A pattern with this lattice of translational symmetry cannot have more, but may have less symmetry than the lattice itself. An upright square lattice can be viewed as a diagonal square lattice with a mesh size that is √2 times as large, with the centers of the squares added. Correspondingly, after adding the centers of the squares of an upright square lattice one obtains a diagonal square lattice with a mesh size that is √2 times as small as that of the original lattice. A pattern with 4-fold rotational symmetry has a square lattice of 4-fold rotocenters that is a factor √2 finer and diagonally oriented relative to the lattice of translational symmetry.

With respect to reflection axes there are three possibilities:
 * None. This is wallpaper group $p4$.
 * In four directions. This is wallpaper group $p4m$.
 * In two perpendicular directions. This is wallpaper group $p4g$. The points of intersection of the reflexion axes form a square grid which is as fine as, and oriented the same as, the square lattice of 4-fold rotocenters, with these rotocenters at the centers of the squares formed by the reflection axes.

Crystal classes
The square lattice class names, Schönflies notation, Hermann-Mauguin notation, orbifold notation, Coxeter notation, and wallpaper groups are listed in the table below.

title: Square lattice


text:
Talk:Xtra (ISP)

NPOV
I doubt that any article with a sentence starting "It abuses its monopoly power..." can be described as neutral. Grutness...  wha?  09:36, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Is that better? Ldo 09:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Sure alot of people dislike Telecom, but that is no reason to create a page bashing Telecom. This is an encylopedia, not a forum. --Matt von Furrie 03:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

 * But it's true...

there's no NPOV and I like it

Why no usage meter?
Why is a usage meter not a suitable link? It is relavant and it is free. Everyone needs to watch their usage otherwise they get capped. "What should be linked to: Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article" from WP:EL. WP 22:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * See my comment about in the IHUG article. Link is no use to anyone except customer's of the ISP and download meters are available by the hundred's, no real reason to link to one just beause it has the Logo of the ISP attached to it. - SimonLyall 10:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

xtra as a sub-heading of telecom nz
a lot of the media coverage applies to both telecom and xtra, and the two are seen as one and the same in the public eye. i propose merging the two, with xtra as a sub-heading within Telecom New Zealand Inzy 10:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll comment at Talk:Telecom New Zealand.- gadfium 19:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Xtralogo.gif
Image:Xtralogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Article changes
This article is still heavily POV I believe. I have made a few structural changes, and softened the accusatory tone of some of the many unreferenced statements made within it. I have also adjusted tense in places, because almost all of the content in this article is past tense, but read as if it were current. However, I wonder if there is even any point for this article anymore, when it might instead simply be merged with the Telecom New Zealand article, as suggested above. Genedecanter (talk) 12:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Xtra (ISP). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.xtra.co.nz/xtra.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 04:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Xtra (ISP)


text:
Talk:The Invincibles

Requested move
Universally referred to as The Invincibles, much like The Ashes and The Beatles -- —Moondyne 09:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~

 * Support -- —Moondyne 09:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Support for the reasons given above. Stephen Turner 10:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Support -- Peripatetic 07:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Support Never heard it called as Invincibles. --  Da Gizza  Chat (c) 10:56, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Add any additional comments

 * A Redirect should still be kept for Invincibles  Da Gizza  Chat (c) 11:00, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Pardon my ignorance. The Invincibles now redirect to Invincibles. Why aren't we doing a cut and paste from the latter to the former and instead go for this official process ? Tintin 11:44, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Because we're not bold? Stephen Turner 11:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

 * No reason other than we'd lose edit history. I always understood that doing this was the preferred process if the target already existed (per WP:RM). I'm happy to be corrected. -- —Moondyne 12:39, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

 * My understanding is that if the target article is only a redirect to the current article and has no other history, you can just go ahead and Move the article. Stephen Turner 13:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Which I've now done. Stephen Turner 13:34, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Dab?
At the risk of creating a trans-Tasman war, can I point out that in rugby-union playing countries, The Invincibles refers to the the 1925 All Black rugby team. There's also a movie called "The Invincibles" and an R&B group from L.A. with that name. This page should probably be moved to The Invincibles (cricket), with a disambiguation page in its place.
 * AFAIK the 1948 cricket team is far more well known than the 1925 rugby union team - and most RU countries are also cricket countries. I'd prefer it left as it is -  but wouldn't want to start another trans-Tasman war about it either.  Note also that there is a disambiguation page Invincible which mentions both of these teams, and the movie. -- —Moondyne 03:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

I'll add a one-line dab-link at the top of this article... I think that'll be a reasonable compromise. I'll also move the half a dozen or so All Black articles in this article's "What links here" list that clearly shouldn't be pointing to an Aussie cricket team! Grutness...wha?  12:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The 1982 Kangaroos to GB and France are also referred to as The Invincibles. Original, huh? --Paul 15:46, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Dab again
The Invincibles has just acquired a third meaning (and there are a couple more meanings as stated above, which are still not at Invincible), so I want to revisit this subject. I think it's time to make a disambiguation page in one of two ways: (i) keeping the cricket article at The Invincibles, and putting For other uses see The Invincibles (disambiguation) at the top of the page; or (ii) Making The Invincibles itself into a disambiguation page, and moving the cricket article to The Invincibles (cricket).

As I understand the Manual of Style, the correct choice depends on whether cricket is the dominant meaning or whether the meanings are more equal, with a bias towards the latter. As a cricket fan, the cricket team is the primary meaning to me; but objectively, I'm inclined to think they are equal enough that we should go for option (ii). I'm judging by the length of the articles (1, 2, 3, roughly equal) and the number of inbound links (cricket, lots but only 13 from real articles, even though it's the oldest; rugby, 5; Irish nationalists, 8, even though it's the newest).

Anyone else want to comment? I'm very keen that the cricket community should always be seen to do the right thing. Where the cricket meaning really is the primary one, we should have it (cricket (insect)). Where two are roughly equal, it should be a dab page (Bill O'Reilly). Where another meaning is primary, we should let the other guys have it (umm... Tareq Aziz, maybe, although we don't spell that the same). But which is the case here? Can anyone else try and take an objective view?

Stephen Turner (Talk) 10:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

 * If you Google for 'Irish National Invincibles "Phoenix Park"' you get 408 hits, whereas 'Invincibles "Phoenix Park"' gets 735. This confirmed my gut instinct that the most common usage in the Irish nationalists context is actually The Invincibles. Certainly during my schooling in Ireland we never heard the Irish National Invincibles usage. So really we have to consider an article move or at a minimum a redirect from/to The Invincibles (Irish history).

 * I think we need a The Invincibles dab page.

 * PS Did anyone evr consider why these cricket/rugby teams were labelled as The Invincibles? Do you think that perhaps there might have been an Irish/British influence in the choice of words?

 * Frelke 13:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

 * On reflection, I'm happy to admit I was wrong in opposing a rename when this was proposed previously. I support Stephen's option 2: A The Invincibles dab page and rename this to The Invincibles (cricket). -- —Moondyne 01:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

 * I've never heard of the other "The Invincibles"s (oh, the shame!) but I admit to being an English cricket fan, so perhaps I am a bit biased :) I suggest we start by leaving the cricket article at "The Invincibles", and add otheruses and create a dab page, but accept that the best result in the end may be this may be that "The Invincibles" is the dab page. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

 * I've found some more! Melbourne Football Club were originally known as The Invincibles according to this. And the 1914 team of Port Adelaide Football Club were also known as The Invincibles according to this and this (although neither of their Wikipedia articles mentions it). Here's something about the R&B group, and here's the movie.

 * There's something curious about these sport nicknames. Surely they can only have acquired the name after the season had ended. So it's a sort of retrospective nickname. Isn't that a bit odd?

 * Stephen Turner (Talk) 10:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

 * I don't want us to have to keep moving things around, so I've gone with my original plan, and moved the cricket team to The Invincibles (cricket). I've added all the meanings we've found so far to the dab page, except that Melbourne Football Club and Port Adelaide Football Club are waiting for feedback on their talk pages. Stephen Turner (Talk) 11:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

 * I agree with the moves, but is it really necessary at the top of The Invincibles (cricket) to say This article is about the 1948 Australian cricket team. For the 1924-5 New Zealand rugby union team, see The Invincibles (rugby union). For the Irish extremist nationalist group see Irish National Invincibles. The article is now explicitly about a cricket team and perhaps the bit at the top should just say: For other uses of "The Invincibles" see The Invincibles disambiguation page. -- —Moondyne 12:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

 * It doesn't need any notice at all as the article title includes "cricket", so no-one can have reached there looking for any of the other Invincibles. My fault. I meant to remove it and forgot. Thanks for pointing it out. Stephen Turner (Talk) 17:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:The Invincibles


text:
Rudolf Antonín Dvorský

Rudolf Antonín Dvorský (24 March 1899 – 2 August 1966) was a Czechoslovak singer, swing musician, composer and a bandleader of the Melody Boys.

Filmography

 * Him and His Sister (1931) - Singing postman
 * From Saturday to Sunday (1931) - Pavel, friend of Ervín
 * Muži v offsidu (1931) - Singer
 * The Good Soldier Schweik (1931) - Commissioned officer
 * The Ideal Schoolmaster (1932) - Bandleader
 * The Inspector General (1933) -
 * V cizím revíru (1934) - Conductor in the Hotel Richmond
 * Jedna z milionu (1935) - Musician
 * Raging Barbora (1935) - Singer
 * Cácorka (1935) - Singer at the bar
 * Pan otec Karafiát (1935) - With his orchestra Melody-boys
 * Světlo jeho očí (1936) - Conductor
 * Three Men in the Snow (1936) - Conductor
 * Manželství na úvěr (1939) - Conductor
 * Krb bez ohně (1939) - Vilém Kristen
 * Malí velcí podvodníci (1939) - Dr. Pařík
 * Umlčené rty (1939) - Publisher
 * Lízino štěstí (1939) - Dr. Pařík
 * U pokladny stál... (1939) - Singer
 * Christian (1939) - Conductor and singer
 * Srdce v celofánu (1939) - Singer at the operetta
 * Madla zpívá Evropě (1939) - Don Manuel
 * Těžký život dobrodruha (1939) - Singer
 * Za tichých nocí (1939) - Conductor
 * Půjčovna talentů (1939)

Selected discography

 * Vzpomínka na Miláno (Supraphon, 1957)
 * Jen se s písničkou smát (písně z let 1938–1944) (Supraphon, 1986)
 * 20x R. A. Dvorský & Melody Boys (Supraphon, 1996)
 * Vzpomínky (FR centrum, 2003)
 * Vzpomínky 2 (FR centrum, 2004)
 * Vzpomínky 3 (FR centrum, 2005)
 * Vzpomínky 4 (FR centrum, 2006)
 * Rio Rita (FR centrum 2006)

title: Rudolf Antonín Dvorský


text:
Talk:Adobe FrameMaker

Untitled
This paragraph is written in first person. Moving it here from the main article until someone figures out what to do with it:

I believe that FrameMaker was introduced on Macintosh before it was released for Windows. One reason I heard was that the then-current Windows release (3.x) wasn't robust enough to support FrameMaker. A related reason I heard was that either PCs weren't powerful enough to run FrameMaker on Windows at that time, or that most PCs in use weren't likely to be powerful enough, whereas, most Macintoshes in use were. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.236.36.139 (talk) 2005-10-10T04:38:22 (UTC)

First released?
There is no timeline before Adobe's acquistion in 95. Does anyone have a good timeline before that?

Just FYI - I added a whole bunch of version info, and a screenshot which I made and can vouch for. I did this mainly to bring the article up to the same quality as the Microsoft Word article.Skuld-Chan 19:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

 * In the external link section of the article, the link to "History of FrameMaker" documented the history back to version 1.0. Is that a good enough time line?  Kowloonese 20:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Klaus Daube, the author of the mentioned History time line: I had correspondence with several long time FrameMaker users in the US to comile the history. It may be worth to read in the pages www.daube.ch/docu/fmhist00.html. Unfortunately some of the referenced information sources are no more available (e.g. the menioned e-mails). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.219.149.197 (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

XML-based competitors?
Hi, I am interested in this paragraph:

"As an all-in-one package optimized for technical writers, FrameMaker remains unrivalled. But for deployment in high-end technical publication departments, native XML authoring systems are starting to replace it."

What are these native XML authoring systems? How can someone learn more about them?

-d —the preceding comment is by Beagley - 2006-07-27T17:43:56: Please sign your posts!

 * They're talking about much, much more expensive alternatives like Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher. wikipedia could probably use a page on that kind of thing.  but, on the subject of XML in frame, the intro section needs some work, it's not nec. "expensive" or "difficult" to do XML in frame.

-a —the preceding comment is by Sighrik - 2006-08-11T16:45:00: Please sign your posts!

Note: ***Arbortext's XML compiler: Epic Editor is commonly used by technical writers also. —the preceding comment is by 207.179.167.117 - 2006-08-30T16:28:19 : Please sign your posts!

NPOV?
Does the phrase considerably better correspond with NPOV

"A few short months" is not NPOV, and is technically incorrect. There is only one short month in a year (February), so a duration encompassing a "few" short months is several years long. In its colloquial usage, not only is it not NPOV, but it's outright spin. --140.247.241.226 12:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The whole article, at present, is rife with opinion. Needs a complete top to bottom edit or rewrite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.144.12 (talk) 05:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Accuracy
I used Framemaker extensively in the early and mid 90s on both Sun and Windows platforms - I was also involved in demonstrating, selling and supporting the software - and I would question the accuracy of some of this article.

The first vesion of the software that I ever used was version 3 on Sun in 1992 - before Frame Technology was bought by Adobe - and this version already had extensive support for SGML, so the following statement would appear to be false "Adobe added SGML support, which eventually morphed into today's XML support."

But my main objection to the article is the implication that because it was a sophisticated, high-end product suitable for heavy-weight technical authoring, it was too difficult to use for a simple user wanting to write a one page letter. Actually this could not be further from the truth - the concepts behind FrameMaker were so simple, and the UI so sophisticated, that even though it was far more powerfull than Word, there were far fewer menu options and far fewer dialogue boxes. It is actually easier to use than Word for most scales of document. Where it lost out to Word was firstly the price, and secondly the lack of the usual Windows UI conventions - it has very limited toolbars and stuck to its own UI conventions that were consistent across the platforms that it supported.

The marketing was also pretty feeble - it was often hard to get brochures from Adobe even as a reseller.

Also, I cannot believe the statement "FrameMaker never really took off in the academic market, because of the company's unwillingness to incorporate various functions, such as proper support of footnotes and endnotes, or to improve the equation editor" because FrameMaker's equation editor blew all other equation editors off the face of the planet - it could even simplify and rearrange complex equations and matrixes. I used FrameMaker for my own Phd thesis and noticed no deficiency in the footnotes or endnotes. I am perplexed.

--81.179.127.223 21:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you provide verifiable sources for your comments? If so, modify the article and add your citations. That being said, my experience meshes with the article in terms of ease of use. The learning curve for FrameMaker is steep. The equation editor is very powerful, but under-used, even in academia. Other solutions (LaTeX, MS, etc) are far more common. As for footnotes and endnote, Frame is just fine if you are using its defaults. However, it's nigh impossible to get it to effectively work outside of those boundaries. So, I guess the moral of the story is "Your mileage may vary." However, with citations, the article can be modified. Blade 20:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

-- This discussion, as it is currently posted, appears highly subjective - 'ease of use' is extremely variable depending on your technical background, and your familiarity and comfort with the tool or even the family of tools. Someone coming from a tool in which you had to hand code a tag-based language would find Frame easier and more cumbersome in ways that someone coming from Word or Interleaf would not. We should strive to replace content that points out subjective failures (like 'ease of use'), with market data/statistics. I am a long-time user of this tool, and not a market analyst; however, I too disagree with many of the assumptions made in this article. For example, in my experience, the barrier to entry for users was the price. In the many and varied pubs groups I have worked in, and at the college I attended, price more than any other single factor determined the tool we used. KCCrossRowley (talk) 13:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Unicode
I think it is wrong to say that Framemaker has "kept up" with Unicode. As far as I can see, it is impossible to include a simple LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH MACRON (ā) without extensive character re-mapping. Am I mistaken? Please, enlighten me! Symkyn 12:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

FrameMaker → Adobe FrameMaker — The product is called Adobe FrameMaker and not FrameMaker. We have Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Premiere Pro. Shouldn't this follow a similar convention? —Remy Suen 12:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

 * Neutral, I don't have anything against it, but something like Photoshop isn't an exact parallel because it's always been an Adobe product, while FrameMaker has not. Sighrik 14:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree. Other Adobe products follow this format, including products that were owned by other companies previously (see Adobe Dreamweaver). A redirect from FrameMaker to Adobe FrameMaker would be appropriate as well. Blade 17:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 16:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

History section very non-POV
The History section has too much flourishing and praising copy for an encyclopedia. --KJRehberg (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I agree. It's not written to Wikipedia standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.212.91.207 (talk) 15:33, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Better picture of structured mode please
The picture of FM in structured mode doesn't really convey that fact to the uninitiated. Only the icons are different from unstructured mode. It would be better to show the structure view dialog superimposed. Nothing too fancy, just enough to better get the idea across that it has hierarchical and nested structures, yet is still WYSIWYG. Kkken (talk) 00:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2012
Please change the link from AT&T to AT&T for simplifying disambiguation, per Talk:AT&T. 12.153.112.21 (talk) 03:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

 * Done Corporate 12:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Display PostScript, Motif, Unix
I removed a sentence claiming that only NeXTStep and AIX used Display Postscript, while "all other Unixes used Motif." Motif and Display PostScript are two totally different and unrelated things, while both Irix and Solaris to my knowledge (have them both running right here) initially used Display PostScript. At some point Adobe ceased to support DPS but not only did they drop support, they forced their customers (Sun, SGI and IBM that I am aware of) to remove DPS from their systems, AIX included. That's where that DPSNXAgent thingy came from.

The DPS version works better, btw :-) 116.231.83.44 (talk) 10:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe FrameMaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140118091908/http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/2014/01/framemaker-12-launch-blog.html to http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/2014/01/framemaker-12-launch-blog.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

No Mac support
The info box says Framemarker runs on "MacOS 10.12 Sierra and above" which is a baffling statement. Framemaker has not run on MacOS for about 15 years. 2605:E000:1313:458F:C80E:A1BD:BA48:BA4E (talk) 07:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:Adobe FrameMaker


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leitch

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Linuxbeak | Talk 22:12, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Leitch
No sign of notability of this character The Land 09:40, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The Land 09:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Defense: There are remains on; http://www.extremedylan.cjb.net

The old website was http://www.thelside.com but is no longer registered. The image used in the entry is of the character.

As the article explains, "Leitch" was known on a local level. Signs of notability are evident through internet search (google extreme dylan etc).
 * I removed the dividing line in this nomination. It makes it harder to read. -- Kjkolb 11:08, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article itself does not provide sufficient information to verify that this character even existed, much less that the character is notable.  Googling ("extreme dylan" leitch) as the anonymous commenter suggests yields no hits at all  so the connection between Leitch and Extreme Dylan is not apparent. --Metropolitan90 14:14, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no compelling evidence has been given of the notability of a now defunct web character.--Isotope23 16:35, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn and no longer existent. MCB 03:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

www.geocities.com/robzcout
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leitch


text:
Red-eyed frog

Red-eyed frog may refer to:

 * Red-eyed stream frog (Duellmanohyla uranochroa), a frog in the family Hylidae found in Costa Rica and Panama
 * Red-eyed tree frog (disambiguation)
 * Agalychnis callidryas, native to Central America and Colombia
 * Agalychnis taylori, native to Mexico and Central America
 * Ranoidea chloris, native to Australia

title: Red-eyed frog