text:
User talk:FuriousFreddy

Disambiguation link notification for January 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marvel Family, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brimstone and Hydra ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Marvel_Family check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Marvel_Family?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Super Buddies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Super Buddies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Super Buddies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Daniel Rojas (film composer)
Hi, thanks for creating this article. I am writing to ask you if you were commissioned to create this article, and if so, whether you disclosed this properly. I'm asking because a few days ago, on 24 January 2020, an IP editor wrote: "Linked to the wrong Daniel Rojas. There are two composers with the same name, I’m the one that wrote the music! :) I’m working on getting a wiki page of my own so articles can be properly linked soon!" Then you created Daniel Rojas (film composer) on 29 January 2020. This raises questions about whether there is some connection between you and Daniel Rojas. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

 * Hello, Sandstein. A mutual connection did point out to me that there was an issue with the two musicians with the same name being confused for each other on here. I verified notability and went ahead and wrote the article myself.

 * I don't know Daniel Rojas personally, and I wasn't paid to write this article. I'm now combing through COI and I'm a bit confused as to which specific disclosures would be necessary in this case. Can you offer me any assistance with this? --FuriousFreddy (talk) 19:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the explanation. A disclosure would only be needed in case of payment or another conflict of interest, which I take it is not the case.  Sandstein   20:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of black superheroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashpoint ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_black_superheroes check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_black_superheroes?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marvel Family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Queen ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Marvel_Family check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Marvel_Family?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:The Jackson 5
Template:The Jackson 5 has been nominated for merging with Template:The Jackson 5 singles. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prince-lovesexy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prince-lovesexy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Monster Society of Evil-related and more
My congratulations for splitting the Monster Society of Evil from Mister Mind. Though we will have to work on the team biography for it as a way to keep it separated from the publication history. Once the next issue of the third volume for Shazam! comes out, we might be able to learn more about the new villains Mister Merry-Go-Round of the Funlands and Scapegoat of the Wildlands since we never saw them in the comics before. Though for some reason, the unnamed three-headed Crocodile-Man in prison attire that came from the Wildlands was so far called Crocodile-Men. Maybe we might get a backstory on that one as well. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

 * I actually didn't split these; looks like someone put in a request to have it done by an admin. But yes - it would be good to have both articles cleaned up and updated. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 13:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wattstax, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peace Be Still and Soulsville ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Wattstax check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Wattstax?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wattstax, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Porter and Frederick Knight ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Wattstax check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Wattstax?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Riverdeep-mountainhigh.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Riverdeep-mountainhigh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Famous-studios-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Famous-studios-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Captain Marvel (DC Comics), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Manley and Howard Porter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rock of Eternity for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rock of Eternity, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Rock of Eternity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Jacksons-shake-your-body.jpg
Hey there. I placed the PROD tag on your upload File:Jacksons-shake-your-body.jpg. If uncontested for more than seven days, the image will be deleted. There is WP:FFD. --George Ho (talk) 21:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stoned-love-supremes.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stoned-love-supremes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Theres-a-place-for-us.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Theres-a-place-for-us.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Supremes-lp-1975.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Supremes-lp-1975.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Supremes-new-ways.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Supremes-new-ways.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Supremes-touch.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Supremes-touch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Supremesatcopa-1965.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Supremesatcopa-1965.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

"Closing logos of Hanna-Barbera" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Closing logos of Hanna-Barbera. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:1970-rare-earth-get-ready.ogg

The file File:1970-rare-earth-get-ready.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Sample inadequately covered by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Labelle-ladymarmalade.jpg

The file File:Labelle-ladymarmalade.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Using more than one image not compliant with WP:NFCC, especially when both images are used for the same purpose. Preferring the US single release..."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dough-dodo-title.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dough-dodo-title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Playa-cheers.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Playa-cheers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Temptations-group-pic.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Temptations-group-pic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

File:1967-gladys-pips-grapevine.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1967-gladys-pips-grapevine.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * File:1968-marvin-gaye-grapevine.ogg

Replaceable fair use File:Papa-rolling-stone-tempts.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Papa-rolling-stone-tempts.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 05:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

 * Thank you! --FuriousFreddy (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

"Soul/R&B Music" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Soul/R& and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 14:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Tempts-mygirl-cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tempts-mygirl-cover.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:J5-ill-be-there-45.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:J5-ill-be-there-45.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Just-my-imagination-tempts-45.jpg
 * File:Abc-jackson5.jpg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

File:1972-blue-notes-know-me-by-now.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1972-blue-notes-know-me-by-now.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:1975-blue-notes-dont-leave-me.ogg
 * File:1975-blue-notes-bad-luck.ogg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

File:JHudson-AndIAmTellingYou-2006.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JHudson-AndIAmTellingYou-2006.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Slyfam-wantme2stay-1973.ogg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:JHolliday-AndIAmTellingYou-1982.ogg

The file File:JHolliday-AndIAmTellingYou-1982.ogg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:U-truth-papa-rollin-stone.ogg
 * File:Jimmy-mack-martha-vandellas-1967.ogg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Slyfam-thankyou-1969.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Slyfam-thankyou-1969.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Slyfam-everydaypeep-1969.ogg
 * File:Slyfam-stand-1969.ogg
 * File:Slyfam-dance-1968.ogg
 * File:Baby-love-supremes-1964.ogg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Theme-from-shaft-1971.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Theme-from-shaft-1971.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Sly-fam-thankyou-star.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sly-fam-thankyou-star.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Sly-family-affair-single2.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sly-family-affair-single2.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Dance-to-the-music-sly-sing.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dance-to-the-music-sly-sing.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Delfonics-didnti-1970.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Delfonics-didnti-1970.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeffrey Bowen

The article Jeffrey Bowen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. TheGreatestLuvofAll ( chat with me ) 13:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Doowop-thatthing-lhill.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Doowop-thatthing-lhill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Our Gang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crackle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pup-named-scooby-doo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pup-named-scooby-doo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Meet the supremes 1965.jpg

The file File:Meet the supremes 1965.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:FuriousFreddy


text:
User:M Edward Meyer

= Background =

Born on December 22, 1978 in Sheldon, IA.

Member of the Illinois Bar.

= Education = University of Iowa, B.S., Economics 2001. Duke University School of Law, J.D. 2004.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User:M Edward Meyer


text: User talk:83.70.221.127

title: User talk:83.70.221.127


text:
Talk:Tessa Jowell

Intimately Connected with Rebecca Brooks and NOTW
Jowell was at a house party, thrown by Rupert Murdoch's daughter, only days before the Millie Dowler phone hacking story hit the newspapers - as was her estranged husband, who she astutely attempted to distance herself from after he was found guilty of political corruption in Italy. (source http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2015563/Elisabeth-Murdoch-threw-party-Camerons-cronies-hours-beofre-Milly-Dowler-scandal.html), along with Mandelson and Rebekah Brooks. Who took the decision to allow her to stay in office after her husbands arrest, as they clearly never split up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.225.164 (talk) 22:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Olympics Cost
The UK Government committed to the staggering costs of this event before revealing the extent of the national debt. Was Tessa Jowell aware of our insolvency at the time?212.139.96.199 (talk) 22:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)twl212.139.96.199 (talk) 22:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Bio details
The last change is odd. Clearly something is in error here, as most sources say her maiden name was Mills, not Palmer. Which is correct? And her Number 10 biography says born London, not Aberdeen. Should the last change be reversed? 84.92.182.15 23:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

There certainly was a third year Arts student called Tessa-Jane Helen Douglas Palmer at Aberdeen University in 1967/8

Her maiden name was Palmer. Her married name is Mills. Jowell was the surname of her first husband.

Please source her birthplace here. We have 2 options, Aberdeen and London, I have removed either until we get some sources as what we must avoid is incorrect info, SqueakBox 16:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

 * She apparently says born in London, and so do her official Bios: . What's the source for Aberdeen? Rwendland 10:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Interesting new bio info at, including "She moved to Aberdeen with her parents when she was a toddler" - supporting born in London info. Aberdeen newspaper says "graduated with an M.A from Aberdeen University in 1968" (would be age 21).  Also "Tessa Jowell was born a hospital consultant's daughter".

Lookls like London then, SqueakBox 13:52, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Corrupt politicos

 * Is there a category "Corrupt Politicians" or another one "Politicians who are Corrupt but Slippery enough that it can't Easily be Proven?"? MarkThomas 12:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

A category for "Corrupt Politicians" ? The Wikipedia site isn't big enough to be able to include them all. We can't get rid of all the corrupt politicians. We'd have nobody left to run the country. Are you mischievous comedian Mark Thomas ? --Parkinsons 13:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I (--farsee50 09:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)) have moved the following POV - not mine but dated 19:29, 13 March 2006 by 82.45.202.236 - here as it's vandalism in the encyclopedia article but is worth retaining here as it seems to represent what many people in the Labour Party probably think and why the story (and the media's treatment of it) is so damaging to politics as well as to her party and to Tessa Jowell - even if she and her husband turn out to be completely innocent of charges laid: "Just like many thousands of ordinary working folk Tessa has successfully negotiated remortgaging her home to invest in various ventures by her husband. Not once, but several times! And apparently not knowing when the re-mortgage was repaid or where the money came from! She sees no disconnection between her own behaviour and actions and the ideals the Labour Party used to stand for. Who needs a Conservative Party with Tony and his friends in charge. The cheek of treating voters like stupid hoi-polloi will come back to haunt Blair when his legacy is revealed to be...................... completely nothing except the systematic perversion of this country's laws and any respect for civil liberties."

I have removed the following POV from the Tessa Jowell article: "This is a supposedly smart attempt to make it appear like the US Nixon scandal of Watergate, which is of course totally meaningless to most readers under the age of 50." Is this really so? If so, we need accurate factual Wikipedia all the more to remind us of the dangers of not keeping politicians of all ages and in all eras under careful scrutiny. The link is explored more fully in the Tessa Jowell/Jowellgate main article--farsee50 14:41, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it would make sense to mention in the section about Brass Eye that she attempted to bring back government censorship, which was really what the real controversy was about. Not just that she tried to interfere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.118.32 (talk) 20:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Lambeth Labour - duff link
The link recently added is a duffer. . Suspect the site is down (google search cache shows a site is normally there). --Oscarthecat 18:20, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Stammering etc
Tessa Jowell is most famous for being a British politician ... Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and Minister for the Olympics, not for stammering a bit. It's really a very minor issue that does not deserve the prominence of being in the lead paragraph. The statement needs rewording and placing further down the article. It could also do with a reference, per the biographies of living persons and attribution policies. Thanks, →Ollie (talk • contribs) 17:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ums and ahs do not qualify as a speech impediment. In addition, that section is poorly written.  I took a stab at it before deciding that I don't think it really even needs to be in the article.  But, since it's been discussed before, I elected not to pull it out.  I hope someone else will though.  Philippe Beaudette 22:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I've taken this out again. Thinking about it further, the statement really needs a source. I'm just not convinced that it's true, or that it's not being exaggerated out of all proportion. To devote an entire section to an single unsourced statement about her having a speech impediment just doesn't seem right. Sorry to mess the anon ip about here, I've just clarified my own thoughts on the matter a little. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 01:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 27 external links on Tessa Jowell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2545327.stm
 * Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.culture.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/012A7C1A-C9ED-4F5B-8420-5684AE5AA1A7/0/independentreviewnews24.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9699031/The-BBC-can-get-out-of-this-hole.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1511666/Time-for-Jowell-to-jump-may-be-near.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/feb/22/profile-tessa-jowell-david-mills
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18440832
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article733486.ece
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/1511137/Jowell-has-nothing-to-do-with-Italian-bribe-allegations-insists-her-husband.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4766978.stm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4761194.stm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jowellgate-italian-judge-will-press-charges-over-bribery-allegations-468294.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9ecf5d56-c362-11de-8eca-00144feab49a,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9ecf5d56-c362-11de-8eca-00144feab49a.html&_i_referer=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9ecf5d56-c362-11de-8eca-00144feab49a.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8535837.stm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2010/0227/1224265274391.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1253672/Tessa-Jowells-estranged-husband-David-Mills-faces-jail-corruption-charges-Italian-supreme-court-ruling.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theguardian.com/media/2001/jul/31/broadcasting.politics1
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2001/jul/30/broadcasting.politics
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/world_at_one/1465145.stm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/it-was-c4s-most-vetted-programme-so-how-did-it-attract-a-record-number-of-complaints-679571.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/nov/19/Olympics2012.olympics2012
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/nov/13/post-office-contract-closures-benefits
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11195407
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6301243.stm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.natcen.ac.uk/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4773468.stm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/27/phoning-hacking-row-tessa-jowell
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/birthday-honours-2012--full-list-7854545.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Life peerages & infoboxes
Please do come along and discuss at: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom DBD 18:54, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Recent death
It was announced on the news this morning (13 May 2018) that Tessa Jowell had died, so this article can now be removed from the category "Living People" and put in the category "Recent deaths". Vorbee (talk) 08:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Tessa Jowell


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tireball

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — J I P | Talk 05:10, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Tireball
Vanity and unnotable site. (No Alexa rating for those who care) Kushboy 23:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  22:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as per ditto Pete.Hurd 00:22, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User:Florian DO~enwiki

Created this user account because I thought it would help me to edit an article from a blocked IP. (NB: I didn't do anything wrong here, the IP I used was just from a dynamic IP pool.)

Anyway, now that I have this account, maybe you want to know who I am. Born on February 9, 1982 in Herdecke near Dortmund/Germany. Since 2002 I am a student of physics.

Since I'm pretty sure my English is far away from being perfect (az a Cherman I cant even zay ze "th" *g*), I don't think I will make any major contributions here. Maybe setting some interwiki links to the German Wikipedia, maybe correcting some articles where I can't do any severe language mistakes :-) Feel free to correct me wherever you want, even on my user page.

de:Benutzer:Florian

title: User:Florian DO~enwiki


text:
Talk:Rana Sanga

Heroic Myth versus History Scholarship
I have no intention of correcting this work but the introduction and text are horribly written with an obvious personal bias. "valiant" "chivalry and generosity" "his gallantry inspired many others" "bravely" "exemplary king" "indomitable spirit" "Rajput kings were famous for their bravery, love of the country" "The pinnacle of prosperity, the heights of valour."

A more impartial approach would read far better.

Hi all, I can assure everybody that the correct spelling of this king's name is Sanga, and not Sangha. Trust me on this. So please do not revert the changes that I am making.

I agree fully with the apprehension felt about the introduction. Just the fact that he murdered all his brothers seems glossed over by continuing with epiteths such as "valiant" suggest that the writer is not only biased but perhaps lacking in perception as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.177.237 (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Rana Sanga is what a true Rajput is meant to be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.155 (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

The previous comment unfortunately underlines what is wrong with this page : a total lack of scholarship in favor of a shallow allegiance to tribal legends & Myths of Heroism. Its a pity that these "rajputs" - who are so proud of themselves ! - cannot find a single miniature painting to accompany this article ( or cannot go to the trouble of up-loading it for Wikipedia ), do not mention the primary sources for the legends : the incomparable heroic verse epics still sung verbatim by Traditional performers in Rajasthan - & apparently haven't done the difficult work of reading their own history. Fantasies are not facts - & sad to say, if Rajputs are not serious about studying & passing on their history, it will eventually devolve into a series of fantastic tales, of no more importance than any other fairy tale told to children ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.190.230.62 (talk) 19:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

 * I think you are no one to represent historians for this topic considering you might only be getting to know him from this article itself 219.74.109.148 (talk) 12:05, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

I do sincerely hope sufficient verifiable scholarship will be forthcoming in the not-too-distant future that fact may be delineated clearly from the fictions which have doubtless sprouted and grown up around it through ensuing generations' telling of these sorts of tales. I do not for an instant doubt whatever legendary epics may have come to stand for history in telling the story of this one man's life have a certain literary value all their own. Perhaps some day this entry will do justice all around, not only to competing historical narratives but also to the legends which must read rather like the Nibelungenlied. Xeltifon (talk) 14:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Moving from Rajput page for use here
In Kumbha's lineage was Rana Sangram Singh or Sanga. Lodi was defeated by Man Singh Tomar of Gwalior but being a Hindu Man Singh out of magnaninimity let Ibrahim go back to Delhi. Man Singh's descendants fought at Haldighati along with Maharana Pratap against Akbar and showed exemplary bravery. Lodi was defeated by Babur later. Now Babur was having sleepless nights because of Sanga. Babur sent about 1500 choice cavalry to attack Sanga. These were butchered by Sanga's rajputs. Babur wanted to discuss peace terms. For discussions Sanga sent his general Silhadi (Shiladitya). Babur won this general by promising him independent kingdom. Silhadi came back and reported that babur does not want peace and he wants to fight. Fight started and Babur's army was being knocked out of the field and victory was certain for Sanga. At this juncture Silhadi and his army just left the field and this tilted the war in favor of Babur and he won.

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Note: WP India Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate, please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 09:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Sourcing
I have just reverted recent additions to this article because the citations are not good enough. Please feel free to reinstate the content if you provide full details for the sources used. A review of WP:Citing sources may assist, and we'll certainly need details of publisher, page number(s) etc. Also, James Tod should not be used because he is not a reliable source. - Sitush (talk) 09:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

 * I have removed Tod yet again. I am also very unhappy with the citations that have been added and was tempted to stub this thing once more. However, I've left them in there for now and request that someone with access to the cited sources provides full citations. A read of WP:Citing sources might not go amiss. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 10:42, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Interesting. Might I suggest that cursory glance over Identifying reliable sources might not hurt anyone sincerely hoping to improve this entry, either?  :^) :^)

 * So, if I'm reading this right, Tod was a foreign military intelligence officer with some background in linguistics who was working in the barely nascent field of ethnology for an occupying global colonial empire. It might be very interesting at some point to figure out precisely which kernels of truth might actually be buried deep beneath all those red flags regarding not just Tod's verifiability but also various overlapping conflicts of vested interests.  I'm guessing that would be a matter of original research at this point, though, so yeah; I guess all I can really do right now is just commiserate in spirit with Sitush that the citations on this article are (at writing) pretty damn downright sad, especially in light of current conflict in the region since the British Empire finally withdrew.  That, and some copy editing, and once again expressing the hope that anyone with high-quality sources of verifiable information on the matter will at some point turn up and be forthcoming.  Cheers, Xeltifon (talk) 13:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Rajput Vizier/Wazir Medini Rai Disambiguation
At writing, the third sentence under "Conquest of Malwa" reads "Wary of his Rajput Wazir Medini Rai's power, the politically weak Mehmod sought outside assistance from both Sultan Ibrahim Lodi of Delhi and Bahadur Shah of Gujarat." In adding wikilinks to it earlier, I inadvertently linked to disambiguation pages for "Wazir" as well as for "Bahadur Shah". The latter of these is now fixed in such a way that the man's name links to the entry for the man, "of" links to nothing, and "Gujarat" links to -- well, Gujarat. :^) :^)

The former of these, however, is more problematic. Lacking any plausible and readily verifiable reason for changing it, I have retained the prior editor's visible spelling of "Wazir", but in order to avoid linking to the likewise-named disambiguation page, I have actually linked the visible "Wazir" to the entry for "Vizier", i.e., the title, rather than "Wazir", the ethnic group. This is pure guesswork on my part. It strikes me as the more plausible gloss of the word "Wazir" in this context, but my paucity of knowledge of the subject matter does not by any means allow for me to claim the particular link which I've selected as the only possible one. I therefore sincerely hope that somebody who does know what I do not, here, will clarify, possibly fix (if needed), and ultimately verify whichever disposition in the matter may eventually be found through consensus to be the actual fact which we're attempting to convey to readers, here.

I do not actually know which article should be linked, but believe "Wazir" should lead to something unambiguous one way of another, because for readers (like myself) who come to this page knowing nothing whatsoever of the subject matter, the simple string of unlinked text reading "Rajput Wazir Medini Rai" may logically be parsed in several very different ways, from a four-word proper (though not necessarily personal) noun at one extreme, to a four-word formal title of some unnamed person or another on the other hand. I personally consider that to be unfortunate, insofar as it reduces a complex, compelling story to an arbitrary string of letters utterly devoid of meaning for readers with neither the time, wherewithal, nor perhaps even the merest inclination to look into matters just a little tiny bit further than they might only ever do if the words in that phrase (and others like it) are appropriately linked.

I very much look forward to seeing how this entry continues to develop over time. Thank you to everyone who has contributed already, making it very much well worth my time to do a little copy editing. Cheers, Xeltifon (talk) 13:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

general discussion
why did rana sanga moved towards delhi instead of towards pakistan or afganisthan and stopped the flow through which outsiders are comming? External / outsiders are comming to delhi through pakistan and afganisthan. He would have first moved towards pakistan and afganistan so that these people would not have got help from outsiders to stay in India. If it srikrishnadevaraya living at the time he would have made a promise that "untill and unless I catch hold of Sardar Silhadi of Raisen I willnot keep my foot inside chittor". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.6.57.119 (talk) 04:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

The Lodi empire was not getting help from outside instead his governor in Punjab was plotting against him and invited babur by telling him how weak North India had become due the the rebellions and wars. Rana Sanga wanted Gujarat to make sea trades possible, if this would have happened he could have traded with the Portuguese which would have given him access to gunpowder weapons. As to why he did not move as far as Pakistan and Afghanistan- It was not easy for Rana Sanga to just move around he was surrounded by enemies from all sides Gujarat, Malwa, Lodi's and his empire was a coalition of Rajput kingdoms so before making a decision he had to make sure that all the Rajput leaders agreed. Divyraj (talk) 08:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 03:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Gurjar origin of Mewar house
As per the local tradition in hadoti region, the nahan (religious bath) before Holi is observed in honour of a valorous gujjar named Sanga who sacrificed his life in the month of Holi. It is to be noted that Sanga and Rana Sanga were the same person, who died on 17th March 1527 (five days from Holi). I dont think any more proof is needed to show what the truth is.

This information is available at http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110320/spectrum/main1.htm The Real Rana (talk) 04:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Sock activity on article
For the ease of future editors and admins. This article is disrupted in the past by sockpuppeter. .Heba Aisha (talk) 23:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2021
Can any autoconfirmed user please undo the recent edits by a user who deliberately removed sourced information from the article and instead ends up adding unsourced information themself, take a look at here MobileDiff/1038727515 where they added unsourced puffery with edit summary fixed typo and grammar. See also MobileDiff/1038726135 they changed northern India with north-western India despite the fact that the source is present in lead with quotes which mentioned northern India. They also did some unconstructive edits on Babur page, see this MobileDiff/1037733523 which is reverted but since this page is in less attention such disruption happens. Therefore, I am pinging as he was the administraitor who added protection to these article. Anyone please restore last best revision by Arjayay as of 21:15, 8 August 2021. Please do it soon Winged Adult (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello User:Winged Adult. Since you are autoconfirmed you are able to edit the article yourself, so long as you believe your changes have consensus. Your diff links don't work so I am guessing you might be referring to recent changes by . His last edit of Rana Sanga was here. EdJohnston (talk) 02:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

 * Yes, all three of their recent edits should be reverted. Sorry for this link error, It's not about consensus they removed sourced content see here, they removed northern India with north-western India despite the fact that quotes mentioned Norther India take a look here (they claimed it unsourced):-

 * All 3 edits of this user are not really constructive or improving enclyopedia. Thus, please restore last best revision by Arjayay as of 21:15, 8 August 2021. Winged Adult (talk) 02:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * This appears to be a content dispute. As an admin, I don't usually take a position on who is right, unless it is vandalism. I hope that others who normally follow this page will give their opinions on whether to undo the changes by . EdJohnston (talk) 02:40, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

 * This is not content dispute it's simply changing sourced content to their preference and claiming it unsourced too despite the fact that source clearly mentioned Northern India as can be seen by quotes. Best. Winged Adult (talk) 02:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Whether statements are sourced is usually up to the regular editors to decide unless it's extremely blatant. I am stepping away from this issue. See WP:DR for your other options. EdJohnston (talk) 03:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok then, I will do it myself when I will be autoconfirmed in a day or so. Thanks for your time. Winged Adult (talk) 03:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Sir I had just removed vandalism as they were claiming Mewar the most powerful among entire North India which we know that Delhi Sultanate was 4 times larger in size and Sanga never took a single city of delhi then how his mewar considered most powerful in entire North India, thus I had done that change from whole North India to North- western, still Timurid Kabul was more powerful then him in North-western India Aninahelaarg980 (talk) 09:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

It's not vandalism part, that statement was sourced as I added quotes too (which are there in the article too). This is original research which is not allowed on enclyopedia. Anyway just to let you know that Delhi Sultanate was a spent force which was long crumbling before Sanga's reign.(Sanga smashed Lodhis several times)

Clarification regarding Death and succession section
It is mentioned in this section that He also stopped wearing Turban and used to wrap up cloth over his head Turban is a cloth wrapped over the head so this statement seems contradictory as a result of poor phrasing.Anyone could rephrase it so that it sounds correctly? --Navin123explorer (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Sst
Rana sanga 223.239.24.158 (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Assam history
Sangram Singha Ali is associated with which kingdom? 2409:408A:8E00:317F:0:0:9B49:960B (talk) 07:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Removing Fictional Map
I have Removed the Fictional Map based on Conquests of Rana Sanga as it is disscussed in the Article of Mewar-Delhi Sultanate wars. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mewar-Delhi_Sultanate_Wars#:~:text=The%20Mewar%2DDelhi%20Sultanate%20Wars,century%20to%20early%2016th%20century. DeepstoneV (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Map
@Rawn3012, please attempt to get a consensus before adding your map. In my opinion, the current map looks better. PadFoot (talk) 15:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

 * @DoobIts, please discuss your concerns here. PadFoot  (talk) 15:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Dooblts, please discuss your concerns here. PadFoot  (talk) 15:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Your argument is that your map looks better? How so? It is a non-academic map and highly exaggerated, with the sources cited not even supporting the areas it claims belonged to the Mewar Kingdom. For example, the map shows Gwalior as part of Mewar, but during the same era, the Lodis conquered Gwalior from the Tomaras in the Siege of Gwalior (1518). This is just on example, I can show you multiple examples like this Dooblts (talk) 15:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Rana Sanga


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Lonely Soldier

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — J I P | Talk 05:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Space Lonely Soldier
Appears to be non-notable. Ashenai 23:48, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete — appears to be a description of somebody's home brew role-playing game. No evidence of notability I could find. Most of the google hits concern the song of the same name. — RJH 19:12, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as per above Pete.Hurd 00:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrivatsa

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to delete the article. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  08:21, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Shrivatsa
Does not appear to contain any information not present in such articles as Shiva, Vishnu, or Trimurti. Furthermore, doesn't actually specify what Shrivatsa is. Shrivatsa may be a topic deserving an article (unfortunately, systemic bias comes in to play: I can't make that call, and I doubt many of us can), but this is by no means that article. The Literate Engineer 23:49, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Possibly a copyvio from . Even if the article is fair use of that essay, the part that was taken is primarily a quotation from the Encyclopedia Britannica (not indicating whether it was a public-domain or copyrighted edition of EB). --Metropolitan90 02:57, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Move this nom to WP:CP =Nichalp   «Talk»=  18:10, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WorldUnited

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — J I P | Talk 07:37, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

WorldUnited
Advertisement for worthy but nn organisation. realted to grassroots.org Dl yo ns 493  Ta lk   23:50, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete good luck and power to them, but there's nothing encyclopedic going on here. Pete.Hurd 00:31, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom --JAranda | yeah 04:14, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Stephensine

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. GTBacchus 23:51, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ral 315   WS  00:00, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stephensine


text:
Sky Arts

Sky Arts (originally launched as Artsworld) is a British free-to-air television channel offering 24 hours a day of programmes dedicated to highbrow arts, including theatrical performances, films, documentaries and music (such as opera performances and classical and jazz sessions). The channel is available in the United Kingdom through Freeview, Freesat, BT TV, Sky, Virgin Media, and TalkTalk TV and in the Republic of Ireland via Sky Ireland, Virgin Media Ireland, Vodafone Ireland and Eir, included in most basic subscription packs, but started life as a premium service requiring an additional payment on top of the monthly Sky subscription. The channel launched on Freeview and Freesat as a free-to-air service in September 2020.

Artsworld (2000–07)
In its early days, it was owned and managed by a public partnership (Artsworld Channels) including Sir Jeremy Isaacs. However, the channel suffered severe financial difficulty. In July 2002, it even staged its own farewell party, only to find emergency funding that very evening. In 2003, with a skeleton staff, it was facing closure. At this point, Sky stepped in, taking an initial 50% stake.

Sky subsequently bought out the remaining shareholders (including Isaacs) and in June 2005 took full control, reducing the staff further, and dropping the channel's premium subscription fee shortly afterwards. 60 hours of classic music along with seven full-length operas were broadcast each month to help bring in potential new subscribers. John Cassy, the channel manager of Artsworld, said: "It is great news for the arts that a dedicated cultural channel will be available to millions of households."

Sky Arts (2007–present)
On 1 March 2007, Artsworld became Sky Arts and Artsworld HD became Sky Arts HD. This resulted in all of BSkyB's wholly owned channels carrying the Sky name (until Pick TV was launched and Virgin Media Television – which included Challenge – was acquired).

From 8 June 2007, Sky Arts introduced a series called Friday Night Hijack. Artists were invited to schedule a night of television that reflects their tastes, interests and passions. Guests included legendary punk DJ Don Letts, Don McCullin, Saffron Burrows, Anthony Horowitz, Malcolm McLaren, Phill Jupitus, Germaine Greer, George Melly and Reggie Perrin writer David Nobbs.

Picks included a Franz Ferdinand documentary entitled Rock it to Rio, a concert performance by Damon Albarn's new band The Good, the Bad & the Queen as well as documentaries and films on Salvador Dalí, Andy Warhol, Rachel Whiteread and Elvis Costello. This weekly feature was later moved and renamed Sunday Night Hijack.

In 2013, Sky Arts launched Portrait Artist of the Year, a painting competition series presented by Frank Skinner and Joan Bakewell. The series is judged by art experts Tai-Shan Schierenberg, Kathleen Soriano and Kate Bryan. Nick Lord won the first series and was awarded a commission to paint Hilary Mantel for the British Library. In 2014 the second series was won by Christian Hook and his portrait of Alan Cumming is now part of the Scottish National Portrait Gallery collection. In 2015 Sky Arts introduced a development of the competition for landscape painters called Landscape Artist of the Year in association with National Trust. The first series was won by Nerine McIntyre and she was awarded a commission to paint the scene made famous by John Constable at Flatford.

On 9 June 2015, Sky Arts 2 closed and merged its content with Sky Arts 1 to form one channel.

The free-to-air era
On 17 September 2020, Sky Arts launched on Freeview and Freesat as a free service.

Since becoming a free-to-air service, the channel has picked up a number of acclaimed music documentaries such as King Rocker - A Film About Robert Lloyd and the Nightingales,    Poly Styrene: I Am a Cliché       and Blitzed: The 80s Blitz Kids' Story, many of which were broadcast on Sky Arts a short while after premiering to the press.

As of 2024, series on Sky Arts include Classic Albums, The Great Songwriters and Guy Garvey: From the Vaults,  with the channel also having picked up repeats of Alfred Hitchcock Presents, Tales of the Unexpected and  The Joy of Painting with Bob Ross. for its daily schedule. In addition, episodes of the Grand Ole Opry, the long-running American country music programme, and albums documentary series Record On have turned up in the schedules on an ad hoc basis, with the Record On episode concerning The Specials, A Message to You, being scheduled as a one-off programme in a night of music shows, alongside documentaries about The Clash and X-Ray Spex.

Sky Arts
Sky Arts (formerly known as Artsworld and Sky Arts 1) focused on the more modern and independent side of Sky Arts' programming. Schedules included cutting-edge documentaries, cult films, and rock concerts. but since 9 June 2015 it has also featured the high brow programmes from the former Sky Arts 2.

Sky Arts 2
Sky Arts +1 began broadcasting on 18 August 2008, filling the Performance Channel's EPG slot (purchased by Sky) until the full launch of Sky Arts 2 on 20 October 2008. This channel focused on high brow programme and featured classical music, opera, dance, fine arts programming and reruns of Tales of the Unexpected.

From 30 March to 14 April 2013, Sky Arts 2 was temporarily rebranded as Sky Arts Rieu in honour of André Rieu, broadcasting back-to-back concerts by the violinist.

On 9 June 2015, at 06:00 UTC+1 (05:00 UTC), Sky Arts 2 closed after showing its final classical music programme followed by promos for the new merged channel.

Sky Arts HD
Artsworld HD was one of the launch channels on Sky HD in 2006. It was a high-definition simulcast of Artsworld, and later Sky Arts, showing HD programmes when available, and upscaling standard-definition programmes.

Following the launch of Sky Arts 2, Sky Arts HD showed a mix of programmes in high definition from both channels – generally Sky Arts 1 all day on Mondays, Thursdays and Sundays and Sky Arts 2 until 7pm on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Saturdays, switching to Sky Arts 1 from 7pm onwards on those days.

On 2 March 2009, Sky Arts HD was split into two channels. Sky Arts 1 HD then broadcast from 7pm to 2am daily, and Sky Arts 2 HD from 8am to 7pm. The standard definition channels continued to broadcast a full schedule from 8am to 2am. Sky Arts 1 HD also broadcast a further hour of HD-only programming called 'Aquariavision' intended to be recorded by Sky+ HD owners.

As of June 2009, both Sky Arts 1 and 2 HD broadcast full-time between 6am and 2am.

From 1 March 2010, all Sky Arts channels are broadcasting 24 hours a day.

An on and off-air brand refresh for all four channels (Sky Arts 1, Sky Arts 1 HD (a simulcast), Sky Arts 2 and Sky Arts 2 HD (a simulcast)) was launched on 16 August 2010.

On 9 June 2015, at 6am, Sky Arts 2 HD closed down.

As of September 2020, Sky Arts is currently made up of the following channels: Sky Arts and Sky Arts HD (a simulcast).

Sky Arts Ireland
Sky launched an Irish standard definition feed of Sky Arts on 8 April 2021. Sky Arts Ireland broadcasts the same content as the UK version but has adverts tailored to Ireland and is available in standard definition only as its high definition counterpart has UK-tailored adverts. The channel is registered with the broadcasting regulator in Luxembourg with the Autorité Luxembourgeoise Indépendante de l'Audiovisuel (ALIA) (Independent Luxembourg Audiovisual Authority) making use of the classification system set by Ireland's BAI Code of Program Standards.

Previous life
Originally, Sky Arts was planned as a full channel on the Astra 1A satellite at the beginning of the Sky Television service back in 1989. Promotional material broadcast during the launch indicated the channel would appear later that year along with Disney Channel. Neither channel launched at the time, Disney due to disputes with Sky, whilst arts programming (such as an early broadcast of the opera 'Carmen') was instead broadcast on Sky One.

Following the merger of British Satellite Broadcasting (BSB) and Sky Television plc to form British Sky Broadcasting in 1990, BSkyB replaced the BSB lifestyle channel Now with Sky Television's news channel Sky News. However, contracts were still in place for some shows intended for the Now channel to be shown by BSkyB. BSkyB solved this by occasionally opting out of the regular Sky News service during weekends on the Marcopolo satellite (which was owned by BSB prior to the merger and which carried Now) and showing the programmes as part of a weekend service entitled 'Sky Arts'. The service was only seen by former BSB viewers, since Sky Arts did not interrupt Sky News on the existing Astra satellite service.

After all outstanding programmes had been broadcast, the full Sky News service was broadcast on both Marcopolo and Astra and Sky Arts ceased to broadcast.

title: Sky Arts


text:
CKTV-DT

CKTV-DT, virtual and VHF digital channel 12, branded on-air as ICI Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean, is an Ici Radio-Canada Télé owned-and-operated station licensed to Saguenay, Quebec, Canada and serving the Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean region. The station is owned by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (known in French as Société Radio-Canada). CKTV-DT's studios are located on Rue des Saguenéens in the former city of Chicoutimi adjacent the Place du Royaume shopping centre, and its transmitter is located atop Mount Valin. On cable, the station is available on Vidéotron channel 2 and in high definition on digital channel 602.

History
The station first aired on December 1, 1955 as CKRS-TV. It was originally owned by Radio Saguenay along with CKRS radio. It joined Radio-Canada's microwave network on October 28, 1957.

Radio Saguenay sold off its radio station in 1981, but kept CKRS-TV until selling it to Cogeco on November 24, 1998. Cogeco adopted the current callsign the following year, on March 26, 1999. Shortly thereafter, Cogeco acquired control of TQS, to which Cogeco contributed its existing local stations. Radio-Canada took editorial control of the station's news programming in 2002.

In September 2007, Radio-Canada announced that it would not renew its affiliation agreement with its three Cogeco-owned affiliates — CKTV, CKTM in Trois-Rivières and CKSH in Sherbrooke — after their then-current agreement expired in August 2008. An application to directly acquire the stations was filed by Radio-Canada on April 25, 2008, concurrently with Cogeco's proposed sale of TQS to Remstar. The transaction was approved by the CRTC on June 26, 2008.

Prior to the 2002 municipal amalgamations, the station's city of license was Jonquière, which is now a borough of Saguenay. Prior to 2010, the station's studios were based there alongside former sister station CFRS-TV, while its transmitter has been retained atop Mount Valin.

Soon after Radio-Canada bought the station, the network announced its plans to increase local programming and to move CKTV to an integrated production centre in the new Chicoutimi studios adjacent the Place du Royaume shopping centre, alongside its radio sisters, CBJ-FM and CBJX-FM.

CKTV was previously rebroadcast on CKTV-TV-1 channel 27 in St-Fulgence; however, this translator ceased operations by November 2011.

Other uses
During the 1980s, CKTV was also a brand name used by CTV affiliate CKCK-TV in Regina, Saskatchewan.

CKTV was also originally assigned as the call sign for a station in Victoria, British Columbia, which changed its call sign to CHEK-TV before it signed on in 1956.

title: CKTV-DT


text:
User:LordKenTheGreat

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: PGP Key Server 0.9.6

mQGiBEhYBPERBACWUbGa9t9z0YHfQ/HcT5ZRWsJuW4J2ZWn4QMWBTYZaEDdlRnHA zikYxnPM4JxmKfiJVmsGdT1CqeZ5+Oih1gs6sD9ArrQEVtjXI38nLlq/C3tbQPWh GshkzwK4oGeMMLEyiqY/+0A3Xir9sOJ+vQnYlEDlMbZKNbr9ryeInPZk7wCgmcju 0v/gCKPQrDQ7B4K0CZWQFJcD+gPps7GrLv5cAHG/KROmuM7Zw19o8pNzTcpJ3OCL 6KKyZPg/10MkP2lnTLUxZxHyXyi+GTV+sX5TR3YStyNG2WGQPWWToUcQXTO6+wgw o5WnV1PsQgNNPLrBbQIP677C6NbaoBAtHtcyvexMfRlHTaBpNMV5VKl3Hhb+U7Ml UQzRA/9Bm1C18FTzZ9fJtgbSnh8Kzg276uweBFSdpJd78s784xDORJ7zbmIIkBE8 QkuXen8yE5qJPdxpTXZBCO8aypVOTPpO0n1nFQ136l2aaiSGfRjleBHxeqsKmiGX kuGwul2s/HHYI/kf1kDWpMq0H3mnX8C4q5F+OfRskGvxcscL0rQnS2VubGV5IENo ZXVuZyA8a2VuQGxvcmRrZW50aGVncmVhdC5jb20+iGAEExECACAFAkhYBPECGyMG CwkIBwMCBBUCCAMEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCJDhl0V3pbDdaWAJ9zKjGJj5f58SMR wQ673E3+BouSRwCfc1+/g4NwratCK3wZhoOof0n4AqS5Ag0ESFgE9xAIANiuGrCE hpnCigwjLO7v5KnuLanQO6Z6MVS38ToPNJssh9cHZsmkRmYoShJT0ZqJLNiN3AyH Doy2nW0pghKcTInUnL08+n2RtW7G4pVD8i5Cd53nk+gMHNr3+KtCCDAb8oGlTyUo t4uo9ru7b0tQlvyPDpyRgg5AJ+6VEVkJwxXeLWTWSsGnn36kyil8i9HpuRRgITPS LBg3FkD7fnQmiuRdzBroCaKEvDl0XPaEG39um60pqUt/USCFNUCingYx9p7zzz7K 3wbJ0zdoO4pQb7hYTqfiksOCy3Jqsgt7Zv9lf/tAi1NdOabCVGFIVLVN0qdgEk1X JW9P8QXtNbKsmGsAAwUH/jVh8f4wpsphU34qs7hfTcxLHj9GWdofNP6ew1MhGV39 eX1CPxLH5mUf388InmzpbCNfz10p2r/eyPC66fpDVa/QUZZdWmhIelbMtKm3dLFn VEqePhJHd7YXxxwWaA/bordu9w3uWnLgUXzS2ZWSZRmuEpAlOdMwcxaTo8y7W+y0 KyIhsu383HmlnEnJIGzP6CaqIphO6yCnLjJ8SBcJe3CmPglSWxSzao9Gw2WXIZsT JWVFFL9eBKmgyw8FYrsp6TctN7hublo+gb7Jp08/89IWsSrOI0WnUYpJs4MPfiV8 eBZjwMfFlR3rYcB1QFrvf8MwlDJBxkFyGvVrOIn97WOISQQYEQIACQUCSFgE9wIb DAAKCRCJDhl0V3pbDZ7mAKCNzZN7axdoq7Fxvy6qqtW30eppDgCfZIVpzsyqekAj LHDzz3nK/lz3PTk= =Va53 -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-

title: User:LordKenTheGreat


text:
Public Service Commendation Medal

The Public Service Commendation Medal is the fourth highest public service decoration the United States Department of the Army can bestow upon a civilian, ranking directly below the Meritorious Public Service Medal. The name of the decoration was changed from the Commander's Award for Public Service in November 2014 to make the nomenclature more consistent with the equivalent award for military service—the Army Commendation Medal.

Eligibility
Army civilian employees who are eligible for Army honorary awards or military personnel are not eligible. Civilians not employed by the Army, Army contractors, Federal Government officials at the policy development level, and technical personnel who serve the Army in an advisory capacity or as consultants are eligible. AR672-20 regulates the award.

Criteria
This award may be approved by any commander (colonel and above), commanders exercising courts-martial authority, principal officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army staff agencies, and officials of general officer or Senior Executive Service rank.

Appearance
The Public Service Commendation Medal is a bronze disc 35 mm height and 32 mm in width. Superimposed on the disc is an equilateral triangle which symbolizes civilians. Displayed on the triangle is the coat of arms of the United States, symbolizing service to the federal government.

The reverse of the medal bears the inscription FOR COMMENDABLE PUBLIC SERVICE TO THE UNITED STATES ARMY.

The medal is suspended from a white ribbon 35 mm in width consisting of two 3 mm stripes of myrtle green near the edges and two 1 mm stripes of Myrtle Green toward the center.

title: Public Service Commendation Medal


text:
Universal Helicopters

Universal Helicopters was a commercial helicopter company located in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. While operating primarily in Newfoundland and Labrador with operations sometimes extending into the Ungava Peninsula and the Arctic, Universal Helicopters held an International Operating Certificate and completed several contracts in Greenland.

History
The company started operations in 1963 and was a subsidiary of Okanagan Helicopters. It was last owned by a partnership of companies formed by Nunatsiavut Group of Companies, Tasiujatsoak Trust and CAPE Fund.

On September 10, 2018, the company announced it had finalized the purchase of Lakelse Air, as part of plan to double their revenue. Based in Northwest British Columbia, Lakelse Air had been seen as a strategic purchase to build and strengthen Indigenous relations across Canada for future job prospects. Shortly after acquiring Lakelse Air, Universal Helicopters began shifting its focus to work internationally and overseas. Pushing for Global growth along with their September 6, 2018 investment in South Coast Helicopters proved to be unsustainable, leading to their eventual financial difficulty.

The company announced its sudden closure due to financial insolvency on May 27, 2020.

Bases
Universal Helicopters corporate head office, main stores and accounting services were situated in Goose Bay, Labrador with other bases situated at St. John's, Pasadena and Gander. Each location had permanent base personnel and hangar support facilities for year-round operations and maintenance.

Fleet
Universal Helicopters had the following aircraft registered with Transport Canada:

The Transport Canada list also shows that they once had a Bell 407.

Customer reception
The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador had had extensive contracts with the company, using them for medical evacuation, clinic support, forest fire surveillance and suppression, aerial searching, survey and mapping and personnel transport.

title: Universal Helicopters


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow Henry Gang

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was already deleted. — J I P | Talk 07:38, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Yellow Henry Gang
Incoherent nonsense. This article has been speedy deleted already but the user keeps recreating the page. 202.156.6.60 23:52, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If it's been previously deleted and the content is similar, Speedy it. At the moment it comes under nonsense anyway.--inks 23:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I have taken the liberty of speedy-ing it, under CSD:A1 and A8. I'm not sure if that was the right thing to do with an active AfD entry, but no doubt an admin will know what to do.--inks T 01:43, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete. It’s just a poem or the lyrics from a song. Not encyclopedic without context. ♠DanMS 00:18, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete copyvio anyway. Lyrics from a Slipknot diddy, "Duality". Roodog2k (talk) 01:26, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
John Galvin (general)

John Rogers Galvin (May 13, 1929 – September 25, 2015) was an American army general who served as the sixth dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a member of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century.

Career
Galvin began his service as an enlisted soldier in the Massachusetts Army National Guard from 1947 to 1950 before he received an appointment to United States Military Academy at West Point, graduating in 1954 with a Bachelor of Science degree. In 1969, during the Vietnam War, lieutenant colonel Galvin commanded the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile). For his actions as the battalion's commander he was awarded the Silver Star, the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Soldiers Medal.

He earned a Master of Arts degree in English from Columbia University in 1962 and later completed a fellowship at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy in 1971. Galvin served with the Army Combat Development Command, from 1970 to 1972, as a Military Assistant with Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), from 1974 to 1975 and commanded the 24th Infantry Division in the early 1980s. He was promoted to lieutenant general and commanded the VII Corps in Germany from July 1983 to February 1985.

Galvin's career included the rare opportunity to command two different Department of Defense Unified Commands following his promotion to full (4-star) general. He served as Commander in Chief, United States Southern Command in Panama from 1985 to 1987 and Commander in Chief, United States European Command from June 26, 1987, to June 23, 1992. During his tenure as Commander U.S. European Command he also served as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander, Europe (SACEUR).

During his time as SACEUR many stay-behind networks in Europe were dismantled, a process that started with the revelations by Italy's then prime minister, Giulio Andreotti, who disclosed to the Italian Parliament the existence of a Gladio stay-behind anti-communist paramilitary network headed by NATO and present in most European countries.

Personal life
Galvin lived with his wife Ginny and had four daughters. One of his daughters, Beth, served a medical reporter for WAGA, the FOX affiliate in Atlanta during 1996-2024. The Galvin Middle School in Wakefield, Massachusetts, is named after him. The United States Military Academy awarded Galvin (Class of '54) the 1997 Distinguished Graduate Award. On September 25, 2015, he died in Jonesboro, Georgia at the age of 86.

Selected awards and decorations

 * 1-8cav.gif 8th Cavalry Regiment Distinctive Unit Insignia

title: John Galvin (general)


text:
Talk:Jodi Ann Paterson

Untitled
Are you sure her tattoo is a strawberry? Looks more like a chili pepper to me. It's not 'Super hot giant alien chick', it' just 'Super Hot Giant Alien'. Wills316 (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Reference for expansion
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=e3cVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=tesDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3989,1968991&dq=jodi-ann-paterson&hl=en

-Pete (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jodi Ann Paterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113191339/http://sports.rightpundits.com/?p=302 to http://sports.rightpundits.com/?p=302

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jodi Ann Paterson