Can Large Language Models Execute Parent Orders?
Abstract
Parent-order execution is a core problem in algorithmic trading, where the goal is to split a large order into smaller orders while reducing execution costs. Existing approaches either rely on pre-specified market assumptions that may not hold in practice, or require task-specific training that limits adaptability to new settings. To overcome these limitations, we present the first systematic study of large language models (LLMs) for parent-order execution. This extends the use of LLMs in finance from what to trade to how to execute. We propose PACE (Plan-Ahead Controlled Execution), a hierarchical framework that decomposes parent-order execution into long-horizon planning and short-horizon execution, requiring neither explicit market assumptions nor task-specific training. Experiments on Shenzhen Stock Exchange Level-1 data show that PACE outperforms TWAP, Almgren-Chriss, and learning-based baselines, exceeding the strongest baseline by 0.65 bps. Behavioral analysis reveals that LLMs make execution decisions differently from human investors: higher model confidence predicts better performance rather than worse returns, and the model trades earlier rather than procrastinating toward the deadline. These findings suggest that LLMs can complement human traders in execution decisions.
Community
Can LLMs execute large financial orders? PACE extends financial LLMs from deciding what to trade to determining how to execute, achieving competitive execution performance without task-specific training.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- MetaPS: Adaptive Programmatic Strategy Selection for Market Agents (2026)
- Can Agentic Trading Systems Pay for Their Own Intelligence? (2026)
- DeepLook: Deeper Thinking with Lookahead (2026)
- CSTrader: A Testbed for Language-Grounded Trading in a Community-Driven Virtual Asset Market (2026)
- Reinforcement Learning for Execution under Dynamic Fees in a Closed-Loop DEX Simulator (2026)
- OpenFinGym: A Verifiable Multi-Task Gym Environment for Evaluating Quant Agents (2026)
- PRO-LONG: Programmatic Memory Enables Long-Horizon Reasoning (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607.28410 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper