Byrne Models

#16
by Quazim0t0 - opened

Model Link: https://huggingface.co/Quazim0t0/Byrne-86M
Model Link: https://huggingface.co/Quazim0t0/Byrne-86M-Base

Task Metric Byrne-86M Byrne-86M-Base
ARC-Easy acc_norm 0.3468 0.3931
ARC-Challenge acc_norm 0.2355 0.2389
HellaSwag acc_norm 0.2858 0.2927
WinoGrande acc 0.5201 0.5193
PIQA acc_norm 0.5593 0.5860
OpenBookQA acc_norm 0.2440 0.2820
BoolQ acc 0.3865 0.6171
ArithMark-2.0 acc 0.3096 0.2732
WikiText-2 byte-ppl โ†“ โ€” 2.6839 2.3753
BLiMP โ†‘ acc 0.7033 0.7356

I also wanted to ask if it was possible to update one of my other models scores, I did a quick SFT training during the Small Models, Big Adventures Hackathon for the Escarda-86M and I know the scores can be better. I just have to redo it properly. The model: https://huggingface.co/Quazim0t0/Escarda-86M, the Escarda-86M-Base would still be the same scores.

Axiomic Labs org

Yeah sure happy to update the instruct scores

@Datdanboi25 Thank you! It may not be for a day or two for the Escarda-86M, but I will let you know as soon as I update the repo. The Byrne Models will stay as is.
For Byrne-86M & Base there won't be any future changes, I had time to get it right for the instruct.

I also just noticed that I was supposed to do a pull request, I really do apologize for doing that twice now. I can open a pull request for Byrne models.

Axiomic Labs org

Oh haha not a problem, both Bryne models up! LMK when the updated escarda is out and Ill update it.

I just seen this now, thank you, does it usually appear after the Space restarts?

Axiomic Labs org

Ahh sorry should be available now!

Datdanboi25 changed discussion status to closed
Datdanboi25 changed discussion status to open

@Datdanboi25 Hey Dan, I just tried to beat the last Escarda training and even though it wasn't very well planned out and also quickly done, it seems I cannot defeat those scores. So, in turn I uploaded another version that aligns more with what I wanted the model to be: https://huggingface.co/Quazim0t0/Escarda-86M-Identity

Evaluation

Zero-shot, full validation/test splits (acc = raw continuation log-likelihood,
acc_norm = byte-length-normalized).

Task acc acc_norm
ARC-Easy 0.3262 0.3380
ARC-Challenge 0.2048 0.2415
HellaSwag 0.2785 0.2818
WinoGrande 0.5020 โ€”
PIQA 0.5539 0.5462
OpenBookQA 0.1360 0.2440
BoolQ 0.4174 โ€”

ArithMark-2.0 (AxiomicLabs)
โ€” official metric is raw acc: 0.3628 (the strongest of the Escarda family).

Language modeling: WikiText-2 byte-ppl โ†“ 2.7062 ยท BLiMP โ†‘ 0.7133.

Sorry it took me a little to get around to this, my computer was in the middle of doing my Byrne-Embed project, so I had to let it be for a while. Also thank you for following my projects!

Axiomic Labs org

Dayum 36% on arithmark is crazy, will update it shortly.

I can test again to be sure. I saw it had really low scores for everything else, so I didn't think much of it. This was mostly to train in the identity of the model.

Axiomic Labs org

Its up!

Datdanboi25 changed discussion status to closed

Sign up or log in to comment